DRC-2013-003008 - 0901a068803b26cb

Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
"DRC-2013-003008" wwweneroyfuelscom
August 26, 2013
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 2nd Quarter 2013 Nitrate Monitoring Report
Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Repoit for the 2nd
Quarter of 2013 as required by the Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04, as well
as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
EN ERGYFUELS
cv AUG 2013
Yours very truly,
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Jo Ann Tischler
Manager, Compliance and Licensing
cc: David C Frydenlund
Dan Hillsten
Harold R. Roberts y
David E. Turk
Katherine A. Weinel
Central Files
August 26, 2013
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 2nd Quarter 2013 Nitrate Monitoring Report
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.energyfuels.com
Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the 2nd
Quarter of 2013 as required by the Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04, as well
as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truly,
r-~d~
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
J o Ann Tischler
Manager, Compliance and Licensing
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Dan Hillsten
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Katherine A. Weinel
Central Files
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Nitrate Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Stipulated Consent Agreement, January 2009
Docket No. UGW09-03
2nd Quarter
(April through June)
2013
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
August 26, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING ................................................ I
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ..................................... 1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring ............................................................ , .......................... 2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed .................................................................................. 3
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring .................................................. 3
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures ....... 4
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater .................................. 4
2.3 Field Data ......................................................................... ; .................................. 5
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map .............................. 5
2.5 Laboratory Results ......................................................................................... ; .... 5
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results ........................................................................ 5
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................... 6
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION ................................... 6
3.1 Field QC Samples ............................................................................................... 6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ..................................................................... 7
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ........................................................................... 7
3.4 Data Validation ................................................................................................... 7
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation .................................................................... 7
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................ 8
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ................................................................. 8
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist ...................................................................... 9
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation ........................................................................ 9
3.4.6 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates ................................................. 9
3.4.7 Rinsate Check ........................ , ..................................................................... 9
3.4.8 Other Laboratory QA/QC ........................................................................... 9
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA ....................................................................... lO
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions ........... 10
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map ................................................... 10
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Map
for Previous Quarter .................................................................................. 12
4.1.3 Hydrographs ...................................................................................... ,. ....... 13
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation ................. 13
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture ...................................... 13
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control.. ....................................................... 13
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps ............................... 14
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent ............................................................................ 14
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs .................... 14
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data .............................................................. 14
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
.......................................................................................................................... 16
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25
OPERATIONS REPORT .................................................................................. 17
5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 17
5.2 Pumping Well Data Collection ......................................................................... 17
1
5.3 Water Level Measurements .............................................................................. 18
5.4 Pumping Rates and Volumes .................... , ....................................................... 18
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ................................................................. 19
6.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions ..................................... 19
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ 19
8.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT .............................................. 21
9.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ........................................................... 22
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
Nitrate Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate mass Removed and Total Volume of Water
Pumped
Nitrate Data Over Time for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5, and MW-11
2
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly
Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H-4 Repmting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control limits for Analysis and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
3
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Utah Department of Environmental Quality ("UDEQ") Division of Radiation Control
("DRC") noted in a Request dated September 30, 2008 (the "Request"), for a Voluntary Plan and
Schedule to Investigate and Remediate Nitrate Contamination at the White Mesa Uranium Mill
(the "Mill") (the "Plan"), that nitrate levels have exceeded the State water quality standard of 10
mg/L in certain monitoring wells. As a result of the Request, Energy Fuels Resources (USA)
Inc. ("EFRI") entered into a Stipulated Consent Agreement (the "Consent Agreement") with the
Utah Water Quality Board in January 2009 which directed the preparation of a Nitrate
Contamination Investigation Report ("CIR"). A subsequent letter dated December 1, 2009,
among other things, recommended that EFRI also address elevated chloride concentration in the
CIR. The Consent Agreement ("CA") was amended in August 2011. Under the amended
Consent Agreement, EFRI submitted a Corrective Action Plan ("CAP"), pursuant to the
requirements of the Utah Groundwater Quality Protection Rules [UAC R317-6-6.15(C-E)] on
November 29,2011 and revised versions of the CAP on February 27,2012 and May 7, 2012. On
December 12, 2012, DRC signed the Stipulation and Consent Order ("SCO"), Docket Number
UGW12-04, which approved the EFRI CAP, dated May 7, 2012. The SCO ordered EFRI to
fully implement all elements of the May 7, 2012 CAP.
Based on the schedule included in the CAP and as delineated and approved by the SCO, all
activities associated with the implementation of the CAP began in January, 2013. The repmting
requirements specified in the CAP and SCO are included in this quarterly nitrate report.
This is the Quarterly Nitrate Monitoring Report, as required under the SCO, State of UDEQ
Docket No. UGW12-04 for the 2nd quarter of 2013. This repmt meets the requirements of SCO,
State of UDEQ Docket No. UGW12-04 and is the document which covers nitrate monitoring
activities during the 2nd quarter of 2013.
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing wells,
temporary chloroform contaminant investigation wells and temporary nitrate investigation wells
is attached under Tab A. Nitrate samples and measurements taken during this repotting period
are discussed in the remainder of this section.
1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring
Quarterly sampling for nitrate monitoring parameters was performed in the following wells:
TWN-1
TWN-2
TWN-3
TWN-4
TWN-7
TWN-18
TW4-22*
TW4-24*
TW4-25*
Piezometer 1
Piezometer 2
Piezometer 3
As discussed in Section 2.1.2 the analytical constituents required by the CAP are inorganic
chloride and nitrate+nitrite as N (referred to as nitrate in this document)
* TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 are chloroform investigation wells and are sampled as part of the
chloroform program. The analytical suite for these three wells includes nitrate, chloride and a
select list of Volatile Organic Compounds ("VOCs") as specified in the chloroform program.
These three wells are included here because they are being pumped as part of the remediation of
the nitrate contamination as required by the SCO and the CAP. The nitrate and chloride data are
included in this report as well as in the chloroform program quarterly report. The VOC data for
these three wells will be reported in the chloroform quarterly monitoring report only.
The December 12, 2012 SCO approved the CAP which specified the cessation of sampling in
TWN-5, TWN-6, TWN-8, TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-14, TWN-15,
TWN-16, TWN-17, and TWN-19. Per the CAP and SCO, these wells were not sampled during
the this quarter. Additionally, the CAP and SCO approved the abandonment of TWN-5, TWN-8,
TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 within 1 year of the
SCO approval. These wells will be abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved Well
Abandonment Procedure according to the schedule set by the CAP. TWN-6, TWN-14, TWN-
16, and TWN-19 will be maintained for depth to groundwater monitoring only, as noted in the
CAP.
Table 1 provides an overview of all locations sampled during the current period, along with the
date samples were collected from each location, and the date(s) upon which analytical data were
received from the contract laboratory. Table 1 also identifies rinsate samples collected, as well
as sample numbers associated with any required duplicates.
As indicated in Table 1, nitrate monitoring was performed in all of the nitrate monitoring wells,
TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and Piezometers 1, 2, and 3. Analytical data for all of the above-
listed wells, and the piezometers, are included in Tab G.
Nitrate and chloride are also monitored in all of the Mill's groundwater monitoring wells and
chloroform investigation wells. Data from those wells for this quarter are incorporated in certain
maps and figures in this report but are discussed in their respective programmatic reports.
2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed
Locations sampled during this reporting period were analyzed for the following constituents:
• Inorganic Chloride
• Nitrate plus Nitrite as Nitrogen (referred to herein as nitrate)
Use of analytical methods consistent with the requirements found in White Mesa Mill
Groundwater Quality Assurance Plan, ("QAP") Revision 7.2, dated June 6, 2012 was confirmed
for all analytes, as discussed later in this report.
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells and/or piezometers, pursuant to Part
I.E.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permit (the "GWDP") (dated August 24, 2012):
• The quarterly groundwater compliance monitoring wells.
• Existing well MW -4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation wells.
• Piezometers-P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-5.
• MW-20, MW-22, and MW-34.
• The DR piezometers which were installed during the Southwest Hydrogeologic
Investigation.
• Nitrate wells.
• In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in
conjunction with sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and accelerated
efforts, regardless of the sampling purpose.
All well levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5
calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under
Tab C.
Weekly and monthly depth to groundwater measurements were taken in the chloroform pumping
wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, and TW4-4, and the nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2. In addition, monthly water level measurements were taken in
non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and
TWN-18 as required by the CAP.
Depth to groundwater was measured in all of the nitrate wells this quarter. The CAP, which
became effective December 12, 2012, approved the abandonment of TWN-5, TWN-8, TWN-9,
TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 and removed the requirement to
measure depth to groundwater in these wells. Since these wells were not abandoned during the
quarter, the depth to groundwater was measured. The depth to groundwater measurement data
for these wells are provided for information purposes only.
3
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures
The QAP provides a detailed presentation of procedures utilized for groundwater sampling
activities under the GWDP (August 24, 2012).
The sampling methodology, equipment and decontamination procedures that were performed for
the nitrate contaminant investigation, as summarized below, are consistent with the QAP.
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater
A list of the wells in order of increasing nitrate contamination is generated quarterly. The order
for purging is thus established. The list is included with the Field Data Worksheets under Tab B.
Mill personnel start purging with all of the non-detect wells and then move to the more
contaminated wells in order of nitrate contamination, progressing from the wells having the
lowest nitrate contamination to wells with the highest nitrate contamination.
Before leaving the Mill office, the pump and hose are decontaminated using the cleaning agents
described in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP. Rinsate blanks are collected at a frequency of one
rinsate per 20 field samples.
Purging is completed to remove stagnant water from the casing and to assure that representative
samples of formation water are collected for analysis. There are three purging strategies
specified in the QAP that are used to remove stagnant water from the casing during groundwater
sampling at the Mill. The three strategies are as follows:
1. Purging three well casing volumes with a single measurement of field parameters
2. Purging two casing volumes with stable field parameters (within 10% RPD)
3. Purging a well to dryness and stability (within 10% RPD) of a limited list of field parameters
after recovery.
Mill personnel proceed to the first well which is the well with the lowest concentration (i.e. non-
dectect) of nitrate based on the previous quarter's sampling results. Well depth measurements
are taken and the one casing volume is calculated. The purging strategy that will be used for the
well is determined at this time based on the depth to water measurement and the previous
production of the well. The Grundfos pump (a 6 to 10 gallon per minute [gpm] pump) is then
lowered to the appropriate depth in the well and purging is started. At the first well, the purge
rate is measured for the purging event by using a calibrated 5 gallon bucket. After the
evacuation of the well has been completed, the well is sampled when possible, and the pump is
removed from the well and the process is repeated at each well location moving from the least
contaminated to most contaminated well. If sample collection is not possible due to the well
being purged dry, a sample is collected after recovery using a disposable bailer and as described
in Attachment 2-3 of the QAP. Sample collection follows the procedures described in
Attachment 2-4 of the QAP.
After the samples have been collected for a particular well, the samples are placed into a cooler
that contains ice. The well is then recapped and Mill personnel proceed to the next well. If a
bailer has been used it is disposed of.
4
Decontamination of non-dedicated equipment, using the reagents in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP,
is performed between each sample location, and at the beginning of each sampling day, in
addition to the pre-event decontamination described above.
Piezometers
Samples are collected from Piezometers 1, 2 and 3, if possible. Samples are collected from
piezometers using a disposable bailer after one set of field measurements have been collected.
Due to the difficulty in obtaining samples from the piezometers, the purging protocols set out in
the QAP are not followed.
After samples are collected, the bailer is disposed of and samples are placed into a cooler
containing ice for sample preservation and transit to the Mill's contract analytical laboratory,
American West Analytical Laboratories ("AWAL").
2.3 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all Field Data Worksheets that were completed during the
quarter for the nitrate contaminant investigation monitoring wells, and piezometers identified in
Section 2.1.1 above, and Table 1.
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map
Depth-to-groundwater measurements which were utilized for groundwater contours are included
on the Quarterly Depth to Water Sheet at Tab C of this Report along with the kriged groundwater
contour map for the current quarter generated from this data. All well levels used for
groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5 calendar days of each other
as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under Tab C. A copy of the kriged
groundwater contour map generated from the previous quarter's data is provided under Tab D.
2.5 Laboratory Results
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
All analytical results were provided by AW AL. Table 1 lists the dates when analytical results
were reported to the Quality Assurance ("QA") Manager for each well or other sample.
Results from analysis of samples collected for this quarter's nitrate investigation and a limited
list of chloroform investigation nitrate and chloride results are provided under Tab G of this
Report. Also included under Tab G are the results of analyses for duplicate samples and rinsate
samples for this sampling effort, as identified in Table 1. See the Groundwater Monitoring
Report and Chloroform Monitoring Report for this quarter for nitrate and chloroform analytical
results for the groundwater monitoring wells and chloroform investigation wells not listed in
Table 1.
5
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework
As discussed in Section 1.0 above, the Request, Plan, and Consent Agreement each triggered a
series of actions on EFRI's part. Potential surficial sources of nitrate and chloride have been
described in the December 30, 2009 CIR and additional investigations into potential sources
were completed and discussed with DRC in 2011. Pursuant to the Consent Agreement, the CAP
was submitted to the Director of the Division of Radiation Control (the "Director") on May 7,
2012. The CAP describes activities associated with the nitrate in groundwater. The CAP was
approved by the Director on December 12, 2012. This quarterly report documents the monitoring
consistent with the program described in the CAP.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION
EFRI's QA Manager performed a QA/QC review to confirm compliance of the monitoring
program with requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA includes preparation
and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field pro edure an analyte completeness
review, and QC review of laboratory data method and dala. Identification of field QC samples
collected and analyzed is provided in Section 3.1. Discussion of adherence to Mill sampling
Standard Operating Procedures ("SOPs") is provided in Section 3.2. Analytical completeness
review results are provided in Section 3.3. The steps and tests applied to check field data
QAJQC, holding times, receipt temperature and laboratory data QA/QC are discussed in Sections
3.4.1 through 3.4.7 below.
The analytical laboratory has provided summary reports of the analytical QA/QC measurements
necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Conference ("NELAC") certification and reporting protocol. The Analytical Laboratory QA/QC
Summary Reports, including copies of the Mill's Chain of Custody and Analytical Request
Record forms for each set of Analytical Results, follow the analytical results under Tab G.
Results of review of the laboratory QA/QC information are provided under Tab H and discussed
in Section 3.4, below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the analytical
laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field sampling program.
Field QC samples for the nitrate investigation program consist of one field duplicate sample for
each 20 samples, DI Field Blanks ("DIFB"), and equipment rinsate samples.
During the quarter, one duplicate sample was collected as indicated in Table 1. The duplicate
was sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same parameters as the nitrate
wells.
One rinsate blank sample was collected as indicated on Table 1. Rinsate samples are labeled
with the name of the subsequently purged well with a terminal letter "R" added (e.g. TWN-7R).
The field QC sample results are included with the routine analyses under Tab G.
6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
The QA Manager review of Mill Personnel's adherence to the existing SOPs, confirmed that the
QA/QC requirements established in the QAP and Chloroform QAP were met.
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for nitrate monitoring for the period were performed.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAP and GWDP (August 24, 2012) identify the data validation steps and data QC checks
required for the nitrate monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements, the QA
Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QA/QC evaluation, a holding time
evaluation, an analytical method check, a reporting limit evaluation, a QC evaluation of sample
duplicates, a QC evaluation of control limits for analysis and blanks, a receipt temperature
evaluation, and a rinsate evaluation. Because no VOCs are analyzed for the nitrate
contamination investigation, no trip blanks are required in the sampling program. Each
evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results of each
test are provided under Tab H.
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their adherence
with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of information: the
Field Data Sheets and the Quarterly Depth to Water summary sheet. Review of the Field Data
Sheets addresses well purging volumes and stability of five parameters: conductance, pH,
temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Review of the Depth to Water data confirms that all
depth measurements used for development of groundwater contour maps were conducted within
a five-day period of each other. The results of this quarter's review are provided under Tab H.
Based upon the review of the field data sheets, all wells conformed to the QAP purging and field
measurement requirements. A summary of the purging techniques employed and field
measurements taken is described below:
Purgin2: Two Casing Volumes with Stabl Field Parameters (wjthin 10% RPD)
Wells TWN-01, TWN-04, and TWN-18 were sampled after two casing volumes were removed.
Field parameters pH, specific conductivity, turbidity, water temperature, and redox potential
were measured during purging. All field parameters for this requirement were stable within 10%
RPD.
Purging a W ~u to Dryoe: and Stability of a L.i.nllted List of Field Pcmtroeter
Wells TWN-03 and TWN-07 were purged to dryness before two casing volumes were evacuated.
After well recovery, one set of measurements for the field parameters of pH, specific
conductivity, and water temperature only were taken, the samples were collected, and another set
of measurements for pH, specific conductivity, and water temperature were taken. Stabilization
7
of pH, conductivity and temperature are required within 10% RPD under the QAP.
Continuously Pumped Wells
Wells TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are continuously pumped wells. These wells are
pumped on a set schedule per the remediation plan and are considered sufficiently evacuated to
immediately collect a sample. As previously noted, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are
chloroform investigation wells and are sampled under the chloroform program. Data for nitrate
and chloride are provided here for completeness purposes.
During review of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel consistently
recorded depth to water to the nearest 0.01 foot.
All field parameters for all wells were within the QAP required limits, as indicated below.
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP requirements resulted in the
observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Attachment 2-3 specifically state that field
parameters must be stabilized to within 10% over at least 2 consecutive measurements for wells
purged to two casing volumes or to dryness. The QAP Attachment 2-3 states that turbidity
should be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a
higher turbidity. The QAP Attachment 2-3 does not require that turbidity measurements be less
than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such the noted observations regarding turbidity measurements
greater than 5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• Four well measurements exceeded the QAP' s 5 NTU turbidity goal as noted in Tab H.
All required turbidity RPD's met the QAP Requirement to stabilize within 10%.
EFRI's letter to DRC of March 26, 2010 discusses further why turbidity does not appear to be an
appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to DRC's subsequent
correspondence dated June 1, 2010 and June 24, 2010, EFRI has completed a monitoring well
redevelopment program. The redevelopment report was submitted to DRC on September 30,
2011. DRC responded to the redevelopment report via letter on November 15, 2012. Per the
DRC letter dated November 15, 2012, the field data generated this quarter are compliant with the
turbidity requirements of the approved QAP.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample holding
time checks are provided in Tab H. All samples were received and analyzed within the required
holding time.
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement in
QAP Table 1 that samples be received at 6°C or lower. Sample temperatures checks are
provided in Tab H. All samples were received within the required temperature limit.
8
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by the laboratory were checked against the required methods
enumerated in the QAP. Analytical method checks are provided in Tab H. All methods were
consistent with the requirements of the QAP.
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits reported by the laboratory were checked against the
reporting limits enumerated in the QAP. Reporting Limit Checks are provided in Tab H. All
analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting limits, with the exception of
several samples that had increased reporting limits due to matrix interference or required dilution
due to the sample concentration. However, in all of those cases the analytical results were
greater than the reporting limit used.
3.4.6 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of duplicate
and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the duplicate and
original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured results (described as
activities in the QAP) are less than 5 times the required detection limit. This standard is based on
the EPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for all
duplicate pairs for all analytes regardless of whether or not the reported concentrations are
greater than 5 times the required detection limits. However, data will be considered
noncompliant only when the results are greater than 5 times the required detection limit and the
RPD is greater than 20%. The additional duplicate information is provided for information
purposes.
All duplicate results were within a 20% RPD. Results of the RPD test are provided in Tab H.
3.4. 7 Rinsate Check
Rinsate checks are provided in Tab H. A comparison of the rinsate blank sample concentration
levels to the QAP requirements -that rinsate sample concentrations be one order of magnitude
lower than that of the actual well -indicated that all of the rinsate blank analytes met this
criterion.
3.4.8 Other Laboratory QA/QC
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QA/QC Manager check the following items
in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct and complete, (2)
analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate Analytical Laboratory procedures
are followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5) QC samples are within
established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7) special sample preparation and
analytical requirements have been met, and (8) documentation is complete. In addition to other
laboratory checks described above, EFRI' s QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items
(5) and (6)) to confirm that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for
9
spike duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative
sufficiently explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are
provided in Tab H.
All lab QA/QC results met these specified acceptance limits.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that a Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate ("MS/MSD") pair
be analyzed with each analytical batch. The QAP does not specify acceptance limits for the
MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFRI
samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are set by the laboratories. The review of the
information provided by the laboratories in the data packages verified that the QAP requirement
to analyze an MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not require
it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established acceptance limits.
The QAP does not require this level of review, and the results of this review are provided for
information only.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the MS/MSDs
recoveries and the associated RPDs for all quarterly nitrate samples are within acceptable
laboratory Hmits for all regulated compounds as indicated in Tab H.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the LCS
recoveries were acceptable which indicate that the analytical system was operating properly.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a reagent
blank. All analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a blank sample made and
carried through all analytical steps. For the Mill samples, a method blank is prepared for all
analytical methods. The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates
that the method blanks did not contain detections of any target analytes above the RL.
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions.
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the current quarter (shown as depth
to groundwater in feet) is included under Tab C. The data from this tab has been interpreted
(kriged) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under the same tab. The contour
map is based on the current quarter's data for all wells.
The water level contour maps indicate that perched water flow ranges from generally
southwesterly beneath the Mill site and tailings cells to generally southerly along the eastern and
western margins of White Mesa. Perched water mounding associated with the wildlife ponds
locally changes the flow patterns. For example, northeast of the Mill site, mounding associated
with wildlife ponds results in locally northerly flow near MW-19. The impact of the mounding
associated with the northern ponds, to which water is no longer delivered, is diminishing and is
expected to continue to diminish as the mound decays due to reduced recharge. Flow directions
are also locally influenced by operation of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4,
10
TW 4-19, and TW 4-20. Well-defined cones of depression are evident in the vicinity of all
chloroform pumping wells except TW4-4, which began pumping in the first quarter of 2010.
Although operation of TW4-4 has depressed the water table in the vicinity of TW4-4, a well-
defined cone of depression is not evident. The lack of a well-defined cone of depression likely
results from 1) persistent relatively low water levels at adjacent well TW4-14, and 2) variable
permeability conditions in the vicinity of TW 4-4.
Flow directions are also locally influenced by the start-up of nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 during the first quarter of 2013. Nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 have not been in operation long enough for well-defined cones of
depression to have developed. Although operation of the nitrate pumping system has not yet
produced a well-defined impact on water levels, continued operation of the system is expected to
produce a well-defined capture zone that will merge with and enhance the capture associated
with the chloroform pumping system. The actual impact of nitrate pumping on the chloroform
pumping system cannot be evaluated until more data are collected as part of routine monitoring.
Furthermore, the persistently low water level at TWN-7 is expected to have an influence on the
definition of the capture zone associated with nitrate pumping just as the persistently low water
level at TW4-12 has an influence on the definition of capture associated with chloroform
pumping well TW4-4.
As discussed above, the lack of a well-defined cone of depression at TW4-4 is due in part to the
persistent, relatively low water level at non-pumping well TW4-14, located east of TW4-4 and
TW4-6. For the current quarter, the water level at TW4-14 (approximately 5527.02 feet above
mean sea level [ft amsl]) is approximately 12 feet lower than the water level at TW4-6
(approximately 5539.46 ft amsl) and nearly 16 feet lower than at TW4-4 (approximately 5543.36
ft amsl) even though TW4-4 is pumping.
The lack of a well-defined cone of depression near TW4-4 also results in part from variable
permeability conditions. Changes in water levels at wells immediately south of TW4-4 resulting
from TW 4-4 pumping are expected to be muted because TW 4-4 is located at a transition from
relatively high to relatively low permeability conditions south (downgradient) of TW4-4. The
permeability of the perched zone at TW4-6 and TW4-26 is approximately two orders of
magnitude lower than at TW 4-4. Any drawdown of water levels at wells immediately south of
TW4-4 resulting from TW4-4 pumping is also difficult to determine because of a general, long-
term increase in water levels in this area due to recharge from the wildlife ponds. Recharge from
the southern wildlife pond is expected to continue to have an effect on water levels near TW4-4,
but the effects related to recharge from the northern ponds is expected to diminish over time as
water is no longer delivered to the northern ponds. Water levels at TW4-4 and TW4-6 increased
by nearly 2.7 and 2.9 feet, respectively, between the fourth quarter of 2007 and the fourth quarter
of 2009 Uust prior to TW 4-4 pumping) at rates of approximately 1.2 feet/year and 1.3 feet/year,
respectively. However, the increase in water level at TW4-6 has been reduced since the start of
pumping at TW4-4 (first quarter of 2010) to less than 0.5 feet/year suggesting that TW4-6 is
within the hydraulic influence of TW 4-4.
11
Well TW4-27 (installed south of TW4-14 in the fourth quarter of 2011) has a static water level
of approximately 5526.3 ft amsl, similar to TW4-14. Prior to the installation of TW4-27, the
persistently low water level at TW4-14 was considered anomalous because it appeared to be
downgradient of all three wells TW4-4, TW4-6, and TW4-26, yet chloroform was not detected at
TW4-14. Chloroform had apparently migrated from TW4-4 to TW4-6 and from TW4-6 to TW4-
26 which suggested that TW4-26 was actually downgradient of TW4-6, and TW4-6 was actually
downgradient of TW 4-4, regardless of the flow direction implied by the low water level at TW 4-
14. The water level at TW4-26 (5539.0 feet amsl) is, however, lower than water levels at
adjacent wells TW4-6 (5539.5 feet amsl), and TW4-23 (5543.2 feet amsl)
Hydraulic tests conducted in November, 2011 indicate that the permeability at TW4-27 is an
order of magnitude lower than at TW 4-6 and three orders of magnitude lower than at TW 4-4.
The similar water levels at TW4-14 and TW4-27, and the low permeability estimate at TW4-27
suggest that both wells are completed in materials having lower permeability than nearby wells.
The low permeability condition likely reduces the rate of long-term water level increase at TW4-
14 and TW4-27 compared to nearby wells, yielding water levels that appear anomalously low.
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Map
for Previous Quarter
The groundwater contour maps for the Mill site for the previous quarter, as submitted with the
Nitrate Monitoring Report for the previous quarter, are attached under Tab D.
A comparison of the water table contour maps for the current (first) quarter of 2013 to the water
table contour maps for the previous quarter (fourth quarter of 2012) indicates similar patterns of
drawdown related to operation of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19
and TW4-20. Although nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 were
brought into operation during the first quarter of 2013, water levels and water level contours for
the site have not changed significantly since the last quarter, except for a few locations. As
discussed in Section 4.1.1, pumping at TW4-4, which began in the first quarter of 2010, has
depressed the water table near TW 4-4, but a well-defined cone of depression is not yet evident,
likely due to variable permeability conditions near TW4-4 and the persistently low water level at
adjacent well TW4-14.
Reported decreases in water levels (increases in drawdown) of approximately 7 feet and 2 feet
occurred in chloroform pumping wells TW4-19 and MW-4, respectively, and decreases in water
levels (increases in drawdown) of approximately 10 feet and 4 feet occurred in nitrate pumping
wells TW4-25 and TWN-2, respectively. Changes in water levels at other pumping wells
(chloroform pumping wells MW-26, TW4-4 and TW4-20 and nitrate pumping well TW4-22 and
TW4-24) were less than 2 feet. Water level fluctuations at pumping wells typically occur in part
because of fluctuations in pumping conditions just prior to and at the time the measurements are
taken.
A reported water level increase of nearly 5 feet occurred at MW-23, and a decrease of of
approximately 3 feet occurred at MW-20. Water level decreases ranging from approximately 0.5
to 1.5 feet at Piezometers 1, 2, 3, and TWN-4, likely result from cessation of water delivery to
the northern wildlife ponds and the consequent continuing decay of the associated perched water
12
mound. The water level decrease of approximately 1.4 feet reported for TWN-3 is likely related
to operation of nitrate pumping well TWN-2, and the decrease of approximate! y 1.2 feet reported
for TWN-1 is likely related to both decay of the perched water mound and operation of nitrate
pumping well TW 4-25.
The decreases in water levels (increases in draw down) at chloroform pumping wells MW -4 and
TW 4-19 have slightly increased the apparent capture of these wells relative to other pumping
wells. Overall, the combined capture of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4,
TW4-19, and TW4-20 has been increased slightly since the last quarter.
4.1.3 Hydrographs
Attached under Tab E are hydrographs showing groundwater elevation in each nitrate
contaminant investigation monitor well over time.
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation
Attached in Tab F are tables showing depth to groundwater measured and groundwater elevation
over time for each of the wells listed in Section 2.1.1 above.
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control
The CAP states that hydraulic containment and control will be evaluated in part based on water
level data and in part on concentrations in wells downgradient of pumping wells TW4-22 and
TW4-24.
Water level data will be used to evaluate flow patterns resulting from operation of nitrate
pumping wells. Bounding stream tubes defining the capture zone of nitrate pumping wells will
be generated from the kriged quarterly perched water level data. Hydraulic containment and
control based on water level data will be considered successful per the CAP if the entire nitrate
plume upgradient of TW4-22 and TW4-24 falls within the combined capture of the nitrate
pumping wells. The CAP requires that EFRI will evaluate the capture zones after four quarters of
water level measurements have been taken, and will include the capture zone boundaries on
figures in the quarterly nitrate monitoring report following the fomth quarter of water level
measurements. The current quarter is the second quarter of data collected after the
commencement of pumping the nitrate system. The capture zone maps will be generated after
four quarters of data are collected and will be included in the fourth quarter 2013 report which
will be submitted on or before March 1, 2014.
The CAP states that MW-5, MW-11, MW-30, and MW-31 are located downgradient ofTW4-22
and TW4-24. MW-30 and MW-31 are within the plume near its downgradient edge and MW-5
and MW-11 are outside and downgradient of the plume. Per the CAP, hydraulic control based on
concentration data will be considered successful if the concentrations of nitrate in MW -30 and
MW-31 remain stable or decline, and concentrations of nitrate in downgradient wells MW-5 and
MW -11 do not exceed the 10 mg!L standard.
13
Table 5 presents the nitrate concentration data for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5 and MW-11 which
are down-gradient of pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24. Based on these data, the nitrate
plume is under control.
The plume has not migrated downgradient to MW -5 nor MW -11 because nitrate was not
detected at MW-5 or MW-11. Between the previous and current quarters, nitrate concentrations
decreased slightly in MW-30 and increased slightly in MW-31. Nitrate in MW-30 decreased
from 21.4 mg/L to 18.8 mg/L and nitrate in MW-31 increased from 19.3 mg/L to 23.8 mg/L.
Changes in both wells were less than 20% suggesting the changes are within the range typical for
sampling and analytical en·or. Although short-term fluctuations have occurred, nitrate
concentrations in MW-30 and MW-31 have been relatively stable, demonstrating that plume
migration is minimal or absent. The relative stability of chloride in these wells also supports
minimal plume movement.
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride lsoconcentration Maps
Included under Tab I of this Report are current nitrate and chloride iso-concehtration maps for
the Mill site. Nitrate iso-contours start at 5 mg/L and chloride iso-contours start at 100 mg/L
because those values appear to separate the plumes from background. All nitrate and chloride
data used to develop these iso-concentration maps are from the current quarter's sampling
events.
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent
Although changes in concentration have occurred in wells within the nitrate plume, the
boundaries of the plume have not changed significantly since the last quarter, even under the
influence of nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 which started
pumping during the previous quarter. Nitrate pumping has, however, caused the boundary of the
northern portion of the chloroform plume to move slightly to the west toward nitrate pumping
well TW4-24. Nitrate concentrations at the downgradient edge of the plume (MW-30 and MW-
31) continue to be relatively stable, demonstrating that plume migration is minimal or absent.
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs
Attached under Tab J is a table summarizing values for nitrate and chloride for each well over
time.
Attached under Tab K are graphs showing nitrate and chloride concentration plots in each
monitor well over time.
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data
Comparing the nitrate analytical results to those of the previous quarter, as summarized in the
table included under Tab K, the following observations can be made for wells within and
immediately surrounding the nitrate plume:
14
a) Nitrate concentrations have increased by more than 20% m the following wells
compared to last quarter: MW-26, TW4-18, and TWN-7;
b) Nitrate concentrations have decreased by more than 20% in the following wells
compared to last quarter: TW4-19, TW4-24, and TW4-25;
c) Nitrate concentrations have remained within 20% in the following wells compared to
last quarter: MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-20, TW4-21, TW4-22, TWN-1, TWN-2,
TWN-3, TWN-4, and TWN-18;
d) MW-11, MW-25and TW4-16 remained non-detect; and
e) MW-32 increased from non-detect to 0.1 mg/L.
As indicated, nitrate concentrations at many of the wells with detected nitrate were within 20%
of the values reported for the wells during the previous quarter, suggesting that variations are
within the range typical for sampling and analytical error. Wells MW-26, TW4-18, TW4-19,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-7 had changes in concentration greater than 20%. Of the latter,
MW-26 and TW4-19 are chloroform pumping wells, and TW4-24 and TW4-25 are nitrate
pumping wells. TW4-18 is located adjacent to nitrate pumping well TW4-19 and TWN-7 is
located adjacent to nitrate pumping well TWN-2. Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping
wells and wells adjacent to pumping wells likely result in part from the effects of pumping.
Nitrate pumping well TWN-2 had the highest detected nitrate concentration. Since the last
quarter, the nitrate concentration in pumping well TWN-2 increased slightly from 57 mg/L to 58
mg/L. The chloroform concentration in nitrate pumping well TW4-22 increased from 10,600
!-tg/L to 12,500 !A-giL. Chloroform increases during the current quarter and the previous quarter
are likely in response to the start-up of nitrate pumping in the previous quarter and the presence
of historically high chloroform concentrations at adjacent, cross-gradient well TW4-20. MW-27,
located west of TWN-2, and TWN-18, located north of TWN-3, bound the nitrate plume to the
west and north. In addition, the southernmost (downgradient) boundary of the plume remains
between MW-30/MW-31 and MW-5/MW-11. Nitrate concentrations at MW-5 (adjacent to MW-
11) and MW-11 have historically been low(< 1 mg/L) or non-detect for nitrate. MW-25, MW-
26, MW-32, TW4-16, TW4-19, TW4-25, TWN-1, and TWN-4 bound the nitrate plume to the
east.
Nitrate concentrations outside the nitrate plume exceed 10 mg/L at a few locations: TW 4-12
(14.2 mg/L), TW4-26 (13.6 mg/L), TW4-27 (29.4 mg/L), and TW4-28 (14.9 mg/L). All are
located southeast of the nitrate plume and are separated from the plume by numerous wells
having nitrate concentrations that are either non-detect, or, if detected, are less than 10 mg/L.
Concentrations at the above wells are within 20% of their concentrations during the previous
quarter.
Chloride concentrations are measured because elevated chloride (greater than 100 mg/L) is
associated with the nitrate plume. Chloride concentrations at all measured locations are within
20% of their respective concentrations during the previous quarter except at the following
locations: MW-26 (decreased from 77 to 63 mg/L); TW4-24 (decreased from 1,260 mg/L to 916
15
mg/L); and TW4-25 (decreased from 190 mg/L to 136 mg/L). TW4-24 and TW4-25 are nitrate
pumping wells, and MW-26 is a chloroform pumping well. Changes in concentrations in these
wells are likely related to the start-up of nitrate pumping during the previous quarter.
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
Nitrate mass removed by pumping is summarized in Table 2, and includes mass removed by both
chloroform and nitrate pumping wells. Mass removal calculations begin with the third quarter of
2010 because the second quarter, 2010 data were specified to be used to establish a baseline
mass for the nitrate plume. As stated in the CAP, the baseline mass is to be calculated using the
second quarter, 2010 concentration and saturated thickness data "within the area of the kriged 10
mg/L plume boundary." The second quarter, 2010 data set was considered appropriate because
"the second quarter, 2010 concentration peak at TWN-2 likely identifies a high concentration
zone that still exists but has migrated away from the immediate vicinity ofTWN-2."
As shown in Table 2, a total of approximately 428 lb of nitrate has been removed from the
perched zone since the third quarter of 2010. Prior to the current quarter, all direct nitrate mass
removal resulted from operation of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-
19, and TW4-20. During the current quarter:
• A total of approximately 92 lb of nitrate was removed by the chloroform pumping wells
and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2.
• Of the 92 lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 78 lb, (or 85%), was
removed by the nitrate pumping wells.
Baseline mass and current quarter mass estimates (nitrate+ nitrite as N) for the nitrate plume are
approximately 43,700 lb and 34,142 lb, respectively. Mass estimates were calculated within the
plume boundaries as defined by the kriged 10 mg/L isocons by 1) gridding (kriging) the nitrate
concentration data on 50-foot centers; 2) calculating the volume of water in each grid cell based
on the saturated thickness and assuming a porosity of 0.18; 3) calculating the mass of
nitrate+nitrite as N in each cell based on the concentration and volume of water for each cell; and
4) totaling the mass of all grid cells within the 10 mg/L plume boundary. Data used in these
calculations included data from wells listed in Table 3 of the CAP.
The nitrate mass estimate for the current quarter is lower than the baseline estimate by 9,558 lb,
and this difference is greater than the amount of nitrate mass removed directly by pumping.
Changes in the quarterly mass estimates are expected to result primarily from 1) nitrate mass
removed directly by pumping, 2) natural attenuation of nitrate, and 3) changes in nitrate
concentrations in wells within the plume as a result of re-distribution of nitrate within the plume
and changes in saturated thicknesses. Redistribution of nitrate within the plume and changes in
saturated thicknesses will be impacted by changes in pumping and in background conditions
(such as the decay of the perched water mound associated with the northern wildlife ponds).
The mass estimate during the current quarter (34,142 lb) was lower than the mass estimate
during the previous quarter (41,350 lb) by 7,208lb, or 17%. The reasons for the difference were
1) generally lower nitrate concentrations measured in wells within the plume this quarter
16
compared to last quarter and 2) slightly smaller saturated thicknesses within the plume this
quarter compared to last quarter.
Nitrate mass removal by pumping and natural attenuation will always act to lower nitrate mass
within the plume. Changes resulting from redistribution of nitrate within the plume are expected
to result in both increases and decreases in concentrations at wells within the plume and
therefore increases and decreases in mass estimates based on those concentrations, thus
generating 'noise' in the mass estimates. Furthermore, because the sum of sampling and
analytical error is typically about 20%, changes in the mass estimates from quarter to quarter of
up to 20% could result from typical sampling and analytical error alone. Only longer-term
analyses of the mass estimates that minimize the impact of these quarter to quarter variations will
provide useful information on plume mass trends. Over the long term, nitrate mass estimates are
expected to trend downward as a result of direct removal by pumping and through natural
attenuation.
As specified in the CAP, once eight quarters of data have been collected (starting with the
current quarter), a regression trend line will be applied to the quarterly mass estimates and
evaluated. The trend line will then be updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of
data are collected. The evaluation will determine whether the mass estimates are increasing,
decreasing, or stable.
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25
OPERATIONS REPORT
5.1 Introduction
Beginning in January 2013, EFRI began long term pumping of TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and
TWN-02 as required by the Nitrate CAP, dated May 7, 2012 and the SCO dated December 12,
2012.
In addition, as a part of the investigation of chloroform contamination at the Mill site, EFRI has
been conducting a Long Term Pump Test on MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20, and, since
January 31, 2010, TW4-4. The purpose of the test is to serve as an interim action that will
remove a significant amount of chloroform-contaminated water while gathering additional data
on hydraulic properties in the area of investigation.
Because wells MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, TW4-4 and TW4-20 are pumping wells that may
impact the removal of nitrate, they will be included in this report and any nitrate removal
realized as part of this pumping will be calculated and included in this and all future nitrate
quarterly reports.
The following information documents the operational activities during the quarter.
5.2 Pumping Well Data Collection
Data collected during the quarter included the following:
17
• Measurement of water levels at MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20 and,
commencing regularly on March 1, 2010, TW4-4, on a weekly basis, and at
selected temporary wells and permanent monitoring wells on a monthly basis.
• Measurement of pumping history, including:
pumping rates
total pumped volume
operational and non-operational periods.
• Periodic sampling of pumped water for chloroform and nitrate/nitrite analysis and
other constituents
• Measurement of water levels weekly at TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02
commencing January 28, 2013, and on a monthly basis selected temporary wells
and permanent monitoring wells.
5.3 Water Level Measurements
Beginning August 16, 2003, the frequency of water level measurements from chloroform
pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, and TW4-19 was conducted weekly. From commencement of
pumping TW4-20, and regularly after March 1, 2010 for TW4-4, water levels in these two
chloroform pumping wells have been measured weekly. From commencement of pumping in
January 2013, water levels in wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02 have been
measured weekly. Copies of the weekly Depth to Water monitoring sheets for MW-4, MW-26,
TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-4, TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and TWN-02 are included under Tab C.
Monthly depth to water monitoring is required for all of the chloroform contaminant
investigation wells and non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-
3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and TWN-18. Copies of the monthly depth to Water monitoring sheets are
included under Tab C.
Depth to groundwater in all other nitrate contaminant investigation wells was monitored
quarterly. As previously stated, depth to groundwater was measured in all of the nitrate wells
this quarter. The CAP, which became effective December 12, 2012, approved the abandonment
of TWN-5, TWN-8, TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17
and removed the requirement to measure depth to groundwater in these wells. Since these wells
were not abandoned during the quarter, the depth to groundwater was measured. The depth to
groundwater measurement data are provided for information purposes only.
5.4 Pumping Rates and Volumes
The pumping wells do not pump continuously, but are on a delay device. The wells purge for a
set amount of time and then shut off to allow the well to recharge. Water from the pumping
wells is either transferred to the Cell 1 evaporation pond or is used in the Mill process. Unless
specifically noted below, no operational problems were observed with the well or pumping
equipment during the quarter.
All of the pumped wells are fitted with a flow meter which records the volume of water pumped
from the well in gallons. The flow meter readings shown in Tab C are used to calculate the
gallons of water pumped from the wells each quarter as required by Section 7.2.2 of the CAP.
18
The average pumping rates and quarterly volumes for each of the pumping wells are shown in
Table 3. The cumulative volume of water pumped from each of the wells is shown in Table 4.
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
There are no corrective actions resulting from 2nd quarter 2013 nitrate sampling event.
6.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions
There were no corrective actions in the 1st quarter 2013 nitrate sampling event.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The water level contour maps for the first quarter, 2013 indicate that operation of the nitrate
pumping system has not yet produced a well-defined impact on water levels, and that hydraulic
capture associated with the chloroform pumping system has not changed significantly since the
previous quarter. As nitrate pumping continues, the hydraulic capture associated with the nitrate
pumping wells is expected to merge with the hydraulic capture associated with the chloroform
pumping, yielding enhanced capture for both nitrate and chloroform plumes. However, the actual
impact of nitrate pumping on the chloroform pumping system cannot be evaluated until more
data are collected as part of routine monitoring.
First quarter, 2013 nitrate concentrations at many of the wells within and adjacent to the nitrate
plume were within 20% of the values reported during the previous quarter, suggesting that
variations are within the range typical for sampling and analytical error. Changes in
concentration greater than 20% occurred in wells MW-26, TW4-18, TW4-19, TW4-24, TW4-25,
and TWN-7; the concentrations in wells MW-11, MW-25 and TW4-16 remained non-detect; and
the concentration in MW-32 increased from non-detect to 0.1 mg/L.
Of the wells showing changes in concentration greater than 20%, MW-26 and TW4-19 are
chloroform pumping wells, and TW4-24 and TW4-25 are nitrate pumping wells. TWN-18 is
located adjacent to chloroform pumping well TW4-19 and TWN-7 is located adjacent to nitrate
pumping well TWN-2. Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping wells and wells adjacent to
pumping wells likely result in part from the effects of pumping.
The highest nitrate concentration (58 mg!L) was detected at nitrate pumping well TWN-2. Since
the last quarter, the nitrate concentration in TWN-2 increased slightly from 57 mg/L to 58 mg/L.
The chloroform concentration in nitrate pumping well TW4-22 increased from 10,600 mg!L to
12,500 mg/L. The increases in chloroform during the current quarter and the previous quarter
likely result from the start-up of nitrate pumping in the previous quarter and the historically high
chloroform concentrations at adjacent, cross-gradient well TW4-20. MW-27, located west of
TWN-2, and TWN-18, located north of TWN-3, bound the nitrate plume to the west and north.
In addition, the southernmost (downgradient) boundary of the plume remains between MW-
30/MW-31 and MW-5/MW-11. Nitrate concentrations at MW-5 (adjacent to MW-11) and MW-
11 have historically been low (< 1 mg!L) or non-detect for nitrate. MW-25, MW-26, MW-32,
TW4-16, TW4-19, TW4-25, TWN-1, and TWN-4 bound the nitrate plume to the east.
19
Although changes in concentration have occurred in wells within the nitrate plume, the
boundaries of the plume have not changed significantly since the last quarter, even under the
influence of nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2. Nitrate pumping
has, however, caused the boundary of the northern portion of the chloroform plume to move
slightly to the west toward nitrate pumping well TW4-24. Nitrate concentrations at the
downgradient edge of the plume (MW-30 and MW-31) continue to be relatively stable,
suggesting that plume migration is minimal or absent.
The baseline nitrate (nitrate+nitrite as N) plume mass calculated as specified in th CAP (based on
second quarter, 2010 data) was approximately 43,700 lb. The nitrate plume mass estimate for the
current quarter was calculated as 34,142lb, which was lower than the previous quarter's estimate
of 43,150 lb by 7,208 lb or 17%. The reasons for the difference were 1) generally lower nitrate
concentrations measured in wells within the plume this quarter compared to last quarter and 2)
slightly smaller saturated thicknesses within the plume this quarter compared to last quarter.
Nitrate mass removal by pumping and natural attenuation will always act to lower nitrate mass
within the plume. Changes resulting from redistribution of nitrate within the plume are expected
to result in both increases and decreases in concentrations at wells within the plume and
therefore increases and decreases in mass estimates based on those concentrations, thus
generating 'noise' in the mass estimates. Furthermore, because the sum of sampling and
analytical error is typically about 20%, changes in the mass estimates from quarter to quarter of
up to 20% could result from typical sampling and analytical error alone. Only longer-term
analyses of the mass estimates that minimize the impact of these quarter to quarter variations will
provide useful information on plume mass trends. Over the long term, nitrate mass estimates are
expected to trend downward as a result of direct removal by pumping and through natural
attenuation.
As specified in the CAP, once eight quarters of data have been collected (starting with the
current quarter), a regression trend line will be applied to the quarterly mass estimates and
evaluated. The trend line will then be updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of
data are collected. The evaluation will determine whether the mass estimates are increasing,
decreasing, or stable.
During the current quarter, a total of approximately 92 lb of nitrate was removed by the
chloroform pumping wells and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-
2. Of the 92 lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 78 lb, or 85%, was removed
by the nitrate pumping wells.
Nitrate concentrations outside the nitrate plume exceed 10 mg!L at a few locations: TW4-12
(14.2 mg!L), TW4-26 (13.6 mg!L), TW4-27 (29.4 mg/L), and TW4-28 (14.9 mg!L). All are
located southeast of the nitrate plume and are separated from the plume by numerous wells
having nitrate concentrations that are either non-detect, or, if detected, are less than 10 mg!L.
Concentrations at the above wells have remained within 20% of their concentrations during the
previous quarter.
Chloride concentrations at all measured locations are within 20% of their respective
concentrations during the previous quarter except at the following locations: MW-26 (decreased
20
from 77 mg/L to 63 mg/L); TW4-24 (decreased from 1,260 mg/L to 916 mg/L); and TW4-25
(decreased from 190 mg/L to 136 mg/L). TW4-24 and TW4-25 are nitrate pumping wells, and
MW-26 is a chloroform pumping well. Changes in concentrations in these wells are likely
related to changes in pumping including start-up of nitrate pumping during the previous quarter.
Nitrate mass removal from the perched zone increased substantially by the start-up of nitrate
pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 during the previous quarter. Continued
operation of these wells is therefore recommended. Pumping these wells, regardless of any short
term fluctuations in concentrations detected at the wells, helps to reduce downgradient nitrate
migration by removing nitrate mass and reducing average hydraulic gradients, thereby allowing
natural attenuation to be more effective. Continued operation of the nitrate pumping system is
expected to reduce nitrate concentrations within the plume and to further reduce or halt
downgradient nitrate migration.
8.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFRI has provided to the Director an electronic copy of all laboratory results for groundwater
quality monitoring conducted under the nitrate contaminant investigation during the Quarter, in
Comma Separated Values ("CSV") format. A copy of the transmittal e-mail is included under
Tab L.
21
9.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. on August 26, 2013.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
Harold R. Roberts
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
22
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
1J:aroi(i R. Roberts
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
23
Tahles
Table 1
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
W,eU 9JUP]e Collection Date
Piezometer 01 4/24/2013
Piezometer 02 4/24/2013
Piezometer 03 4/24/2013
TWN-01 4/23/2013
TWN-02 4/24/2013
TWN-03 4/24/2013
TWN-04 4/23/2013
TWN-07 4/24/2013
TWN-07R 4/23/2013
TWN-18 4/23/2013
TW4-22 6/5/2013
TW4-24 6/5/2013
TW4-25 6/5/2013
TWN-60 4/25/2013
TW4-60 6/13/2013
TWN-65 4/23/2013
Note: All wells were sampled for Nitrate and Chloride.
TWN-60 is a DI Field Blank.
TWN-65 is a duplicate of TWN-18.
TW4-60 is the chloroform program DI Field Blank.
Continuously pumped well.
Date., of Lab Report
5/14/13 (5/3/13)
5/14/13 (5/3113)
5114/13 (5/3113)
5/14/13 (5/3/13)
5/14113 (5/3/13)
5114113 (5/3113)
5/14/13 (5/3/13)
5/14/13 (5/3113)
5114113 (5/3/13)
5/14/13 (5/3/13)
6/18/2013
6/18/2013
6118/2013
5/14/13 (5/3/13)
6/24/2013
5114/13 (5/3/13)
Date in parantheses represents the date the data were originally reported. The data package was resubmitted to
correct errors.
Table 2 Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
MW-4 TW4-19 TW4-20 TW4-4 TW4-22 TW4-24 TW4-2S TWN-02 Quarter Totals
Quarter (lbs.) MW-26 (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.)
Q3 2010 3.2 0.3 5.8 1.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA 15.7
Q4 2010 3.8 0.4 17.3 1.4 5.1 NA NA NA NA 28.0
Q1 201 I 2.9 0.2 64.5 1.4 4.3 NA NA NA NA 73.3
Q2 2011 3.5 0.1 15.9 2.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA 27.0
Q3 2011 3.5 0.5 3.5 3.9 5.4 NA NA NA NA 16.8
Q4 2011 3.8 0.8 6.2 2.5 6.4 NA NA NA NA 19.7
Q1 2012 3.6 0.4 0.7 5.0 6.0 NA NA NA NA 15.9
Q2 2012 3.7 0.6 3.4 2.1 5.2 NA NA NA NA 15.0
Q3 2012 3.8 0.5 3.6 2.0 4.7 NA NA NA NA 14.7
Q4 2012 3.2 0.4 5.4 1.8 4.2 NA NA NA NA 14.9
Q1 2013 2.5 0.4 14.1 1.4 3.6 8.1 43.4 7.5 14.8 95.7
Q2 2013 2.5 0.5 5.6 1.7 3.5 10.7 37.1 6.4 23.9 91.7
Well Totals (pounds) 40.0 5.2 146.0 27.7 57.8 18.8 80.5 13.9 38.7 428.4
Table 3 Nitrate Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Volume of Water Pumped
Pumping Well Name during the quarter (gals) Average Pump Rate (gpm)
MW-4 71,187.3 4.3
MW-26 25,343.4 10.2
TW4-4 65,603.4 8.1
TW4-19 226,224.0 14.0
TW4-20 20,252.4 9.7
TW4-22 25,523.2 I 8.1
TW4-24 187,509.3 18.2
TW4-25 147,310.4 18.1
TWN-2 49,579.3 18.7
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
MW-4 MW-26
Total
Total Total Pumped Total Total 'Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter Pumped (glil) _ Conc(mg/L) Cone (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L). (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
Total Gallons I I I II
pumped for Total I, I
the quarter Total pumped Total grams/453.
Calculations from the Concentration Concentration gallons/3. 785 Concentration ug/1000000 592to ,,
and Data Flow Meter from the in mg/LX1 000 to to conver to in ug/L X total to convert to convert to
Origination data analytical data , convert to ug/L liters liters grams pounds -
Q3 2010 79859.1 4.8 4800 302266.7 1450880129 1450.9 3.20 63850.0 0.6 600 241672.3 145003350 145 0.32
Q4 2010 90042.2 5 5000 340809.7 1704048635 1704.0 3.76 60180.0 0.7 700 227781.3 159446910 159 0.35
Q12011 76247.6 4,6 4600 288597.2 1327546964 1327.5 2.93 55130.0 0.5 500 208667.1 104333525 104 0.23
Q22011 85849.3 4.9 4900 324939.6 1592204042 1592,2 3.51 55800.6 0.3 300 211205.3 63361581 63 0.14
Q3 2011 85327.7 4.9 4900 322965.3 1582530188 1582.5 3.49 65618.0 0.9 900 248364.1 223527717 224 0.49
Q4 2011 89735.0 5.1 5100 339647.0 1732199573 1732.2 3.82 50191.3 2 2000 189974.1 379948141 380 0.84
Q12012 90376.4 4.8 4800 342074.7 1641958435 1642.0 3.62 31440.1 1.7 1700 119000.8 202301323 202 0.45
Q2 2012 90916.5 4.9 4900 344118.8 1686181940 1686.2 3.72 26701.2 2.5 2500 101064.1 252660294 253 0.56
Q3 2012 91607.0 5 5000 346732.5 1733662475 1733.7 3.82 25246.0 2.6 2600 95556.1 248445886 248 0.55
Q4 2012 78840.0 4.8 4800 298409.4 1432365120 1432.4 3.16 30797.0 1.46 1460 116566.6 170187302 170 0.38
Q1 2013 62943.7 4.78 4780 238241.9 1138796304 1138.8 2.51 22650.7 2.27 2270 85732.9 194613682 195 0.43
Q2 2013 71187.3 4.22 4220 269443.9 1137053387 1137.1 2.51 25343.4 2.11 2110 95924.8 202401263 202 0.45
Totals Since Q3
2010 992931.75 40.03 512948.3 5.17
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-19 _TW4-20
Total Pumped Cone Cone Total Pumped Total Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Total Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
I I I
I
Calculations
and Data
Origination -
Q3 2010 116899.2 5.9 5900 442463.5 2.611E+09 2611 5.76 39098.3 5.3 5300 147987.1 784331447 784 1.73
Q4 2010 767970.5 2.7 2700 2906768.3 7.848E+09 7848 17.30 36752.5 4.6 4600 139108.2 639897778 640 1.41
Q12011 454607.9 17 17000 1720690.9 2.925E+10 29252 64.49 37187.5 4.4 4400 140754.7 619320625 619 1.37
Q2 2011 159238.9 12 12000 602719.2 7.233E+09 7233 15.95 67907.7 4.8 4800 257030.6 1.234E+09 1234 2.72
Q3 2011 141542.6 3 3000 535738.7 1.607E+09 1607 3.54 72311.2 6.5 6500 273697.9 1.779E+09 1779 3.92
Q4 2011 147647.2 5 5000 558844.7 2.794E+09 2794 6.16 72089.3 4.2 4200 272858.0 1.146E+09 1146 2.53
Q12012 148747.0 0.6 600 563007.4 337804437 338 0.74 76306.0 7.9 7900 288818.2 2.282E+09 2282 5.03
Q2 2012 172082.0 2.4 2400 651330.5 1.563E+09 1563 3.45 22956.4 11 11000 86890.1 955790963 956 2.11
Q3 2012 171345.0 2.5 2500 648540.8 1.621E+09 1621 3.57 22025.0 10.8 10800 83364.6 900337950 900 1.98
Q4 2012 156653.0 4.1 4100 592931.6 2.431E+09 2431 5.36 20114.0 11 11000 76131.5 837446390 837 1.85
Q12013 210908.0 7.99 7990 798286.8 6.378E+09 6378 14.06 18177.0 9.07 9070 68799.9 624015501 624 1.38
Q2 2013 226224.0 2.95 2950 856257.8 2.526E+09 2526 5.57 20252.4 9.76 9760 76655.3 748156060 748 1.65
Totals Since Q3
2010 2873865.3 145.95 505177.3 27.67
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-4 TW4-22
Total Total Total Total
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mg/L) (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
J
. I I I
I,
I
I
I 1 r Calculations
and Data ., :. •
Origination -
03 2010 76916.8 7.30 7300.00 291130.1 2.1E+09 2125.25 4.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2010 86872.1 7.10 7100.00 328810.9 2.3E+09 2334.56 5.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12011 73360.0 7.00 7000.00 277667.6 1.9E+09 1943.67 4.29 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
02 2011 80334.6 7.00 7000.00 304066.5 2.1E+09 2128.47 4.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
03 2011 97535.0 6.60 6600.00 369170.0 2.4E+09 2436.52 5.37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
04 2011 109043.5 7.00 7000.00 412729.6 2.9E+09 2889.11 6.37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12012 101616.8 7.10 7100,00 384619.6 2.7E+09 2730.80 6.02 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
02 2012 87759.1 7.10 7100.00 332168.2 2.4E+09 2358.39 5.20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
03 2012 80006.0 7.10 7100.00 302822.7 2.2E+09 2150.04 4.74 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
04 2012 71596.0 7.00 7000.00 270990.9 1.9E+09 1896.94 4.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
012013 58716.8 7.36 7360.00 222243.1 1.6E+09 1635.71 3.61 16677.4 58.0 58000.0 63124.0 3661189622.0 3661.2 8.07
Q2 2013 65603.4 6.30 6300.00 248308.9 1.6E+09 1564.35 3.45 25523.2 50.2 50200.0 96605.3 4849586662.4 4849.6 10.69
Totals Since Q3
2010 989360.1 57,75 42200.6 18.76
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
TW4-24 TW4-25 I
I
I Total Total Total Total
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total
Quarter (gal) (mg/L) . (ug/L) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (gal) (mgll) (ugll) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds)
Calculations I
and Data
Origination I
Q3 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q1 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q2 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q3 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q4 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Q12013 144842.6 35.9 35900.0 548229.2 19681429751.9 19681.4 43.39 99369.9 9.0 9000.0 376115.1 3385035643.5 3385.0 7.46
Q2 2013 187509.3 23.7 23700.0 709722.7 16820428001.9 16820.4 37.08 147310.4 5.2 5240.0 557569.9 2921666087.4 2921.7 6.44
Totals Since Q3
2010 332351.9 80.47 246680.3 13.90
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
lWN-OZ
I Total
Removed
Total Total by All
Pumped Cone Cone Pumped Total Total Wells I
Quarter (gal) (mgll) (ug/l) (liters) Total (ug) (grams) (pounds) (pounds).
I
I I
I I
Calculations II I
and Data I Origination I I
Q3 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.69
Q4 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.97 I
Q12011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 73.30 I
Q2 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27.01 I
Q3 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 16.82
Q4 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 19.71
Q12012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.86
Q2 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.03
Q3 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.67
Q4 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.92
Q1 2013 31009.4 57.3 57300.0 117370.6 6725334176.7 6725.3 14.83 95.73
Q22013 49579.3 57.7 57700.0 187657.7 10827846433.9 10827.8 23.87 91.71 -
Totals Since Q3
ZOlO 80588.7 38,70 428.41
Highlighted cells are the total for the current quarter
LQcati.o'n. Q220TO
MW~J) 15.8
MW-31 22.5
MW~ ND
MW4J ND
ND =Not detected
NS = Not Sampled
Cfl3 ·20J0
15
21
NS
ND
Table 5 Nitrate Data Over Time for MW-30. MW-31. MW-5. and MW-11 .
Q4·2QiLtl: Ql.c2QJ 1 QZ2<il r .Q3 201.1 :Q42QJJ QL20J2 Q220I2
16 16 17 16 16 17 16
20 21 22 21 21 21 20
0.2 NS 0.2 NS 0.2 NS 0.1
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND --
Q32012 'Q4a012 QJ 101'3 Q2 '20;13
17 18.5 21.4 18.8
21 23 .6 19.3 23.8
NS ND NS ND
ND ND ND ND
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Receipt Temperature Check
H-4 Analytical Method Check
H-5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-6 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-7 Rinsate Check
H-8 QC Control Limits for Analyses and Blanks
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
TW4-19 e
MW-5 • TW4-12
0
TWN-10 <>
PIEZ-1
perched chloroform or
nitrate pumping well
~rched monitoring well
temporary perched monitoring well
temporary perchSd nitrate monitoring well
Q perched piezometer
TW4-28
~ temporary perched monitoring well
installed March, 2013
RUIN SPRING
b seep or spring
HYDRO
GEO
CIIEM,INC.
SITE PLAN SHOWING PERCHED WELL
AND PIEZOMETER LOCATIONS
WHITE MESA SITE
DATE REFERENCE
H:/718000/may13/Uwelloc13.srf
FIGURE
A-1
TabB
Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Name
TWN-7
TWN-1
TWN-4
TWN-18
TWN-3
TWN-2
Duplicate of
Rlnsate
Plez 1
Piez 2
Piez3
Nitrate
Ms/L
Previous
Nitrate Samples
Qrt. Date/Purse sample
0.591 1-J/z.~ oqz.z.
0.681 1-ih."!> ox1l\
1.51 4/t.'3 0'12"'2..
2.27 '-\lz:~ \00'1
22.2 _ljl2i o9·~s
57.3 '-:1_/'Z.I-J o'l'iS
If< I4/Z.'3 \00'1
0.218 ~/2"1 lD6C>
8.11 <-j/{j.f )Ol'
1.85 '-{/2-t-f t02S
Nitrate Order
2nd Quarter 2013
Depth Total Depth
105
112.5
125.7
145
96
96
Rlnsate Samples
Name Date Sample
TWN-7R I ~tz.3
TWN-1R
TWN-4R
TWN-18R
TWN-3R
TWN-2R
Samplers:
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL '/ See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 2. n a a ..Ao.rtGr A) ;-f-r~fc. -zo I::S
Location (well name): ._I _,_P_,i_,.e'-". z.::..-.....;0:::....:....1 -----------'
Sampler Name
and initials: l ~mtc:r HoJI."IJf\t /-r')f
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I "j l z~ 1-zoj3 and Sampling (if different) .__tV._Y_,/'-'~---------'
Well Purging Equip Used: [Q]pump or 00 bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I.....,Mo-=..'/.:...:H::..._ _____ __.
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ casings
Sampling Event I Qv.w-I crl""J A) )-}r,d"(, Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event!'-_-r_w_N_-_0_1 _____ ___....~
pH Buffer 7.0 ?.u 1.0 pH Buffer 4.0 '-f .O
Specific Conductance '-j_qJ...ql.-'1'-----..Jl~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft):l ..._ _D ____ __,
Depth to Water Before Purging I b 'Z. 2.}~ Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~_o ___ -i,(.653h)
3" Well:_ D . (.367h)
Conductance (avg) .___2.._:\_._Y_._._l _____ _. pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 119 · 3.21 Redox Potential (Eh)l 3'\ 7 Turbidity'-11.!-•-.:.7 __ _
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event)l._ ..J..]_fJ __ __.
Time jDttS4 I Gal. Purged l o I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 12Y41 I pH 11 .41 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc 119.>2> I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I '3>~~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I } ./ I Turbidity (NTU) I J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in g1 m.
s16o = ._I .-....::o ___ ---1
Time to evacuate two ca·ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) Ia
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs .._I ...L&.._I.J~A,..·=L'---------1
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL D 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 IE H2S04 121 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250m! 0 D HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radio log~~ 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 D HN03 0 D
Other (specify) IE] 0 Sample volume 0 Uil 0 Jal
c~\or;~( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I G_~~·...:.;'i::S.:..__ __ ___. Sample Time 1000
See instruction
Comment
Piez-01 04-24-2013 loo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
, Mill· Grc·•mdwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7 -"
Groundwater Monitoring Qu~fity Assurance Plan (QAPl
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URAt'I.'IUM MILL s~e inotntction
FIELD DATA \\'ORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Dc~ri~~n~Sampl~gE~~: I~~~~~,~~Q-~~~-~~r~-~~~-f_ra_+_~~-~-o_~_l$~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Location (weH name):j L -t.P....!i~.::.=z.~-...::O:..Z;;...._~-~~~-~---~
Samp lcr Name
and initials: EJjf!;_l, ~r }L 1 );J'\"\ /-r"11
field Sample ID p. t!.."Z--oz_oy z.y ·2.o L3
Date and Time for Purging @.E:J / '2.01.3 '"'------";;;....__-~~--' and Sampling (if different) 1'"'".-v-'/_tl~~~--~-~--'
Well Purg.ing Equip Used: @]pump or IT[] bailer Well Pmnp (if other than Bermel) I._;._M.:...:ri...;.Q ______ _
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings [g]3 casings
Sampling EYent IA"-r-t<:rb N ~+raf<. Pre\. Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1~...--.:"P_; c:~'--~_O_i_~~~~--'
pH Buffer 7 n pH R11 ffer 4 0 4 .0
Specific Conductance !'-~tj..__Cf,_1.__~----'l11MHOS/ em Well Dcpth(O.Olft): I o t........;; ____ _
Depth to Water Before Purging I 30, & '2. 4" wctt :r _;,o ___ -~!<·65Jh)
:\" We11 :_ c _ .367h)
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) i)H nf\Val l:!r avg) l.__.7~·'-''l._:s),. ______ __.
Well Water Temp. (avg) TurbidiLyj :z... ~
Weather Cond. Ext'! Am b. Temp. ~c (prior sampting event)l._.._.g~.: __ ____.
Time I 1Dt Z. I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance l b?S\ I pH II A~ l Conduct a nee I I pH j I
Temp. "C 0'1 .q5 I Temp. oc I I
RedDx Potential Eh (mY} ~~~~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 2 .1o I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I GaL Purged I I Time I I GaL Purged [ I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. "C I ] Temp. 0 ( I I
Redox Potential Eh (mY} I I Redox. Potential Eh (mV) I I
'turbidity (l\'TU) I I Turbidiry (NTU) I I
Wf1it.o Meosa MHI
F•eld Data Worksh~et for Gmundwater A 1 of; captu rx" COMP/o TIBL£ WITH /"-UI-.C'f'i;---FUN C TIO,Alll
o MHI· Gro'>ndwater Discharge Permit Dote: 04/04/13 Rev. 7 3
Groundwater Monitoring Quo lily A,.,;urance Pion {QAP }
Volume of Water Purged 0 galfon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
flo\\' Rate QJ, in gpnt
S/60= I 0
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other lhnn two)
if well evacnared to dryness. number of gaHons evacuated
Time to evacuate two c:J&ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I c I
[_0 _ __,
[o
Name ofCertHied Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs j '-.!..-A.:....W_;,;A_L _____ __.J
Sample Taken S;unplc Vol (jndicate Filtered Prcscn·ativc Added Type of Sample if other than as Prcsen ati-vc Type
y N specilicd below) y N y N
V<JCs 0 D 3x40 rnl 0 0 HCL 0 D
fi\utricnts ~ D i 00 mf 0 .~ H2S04 ~ 0
I ka\'Y Metals 0 D 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non RadlOII>J:!.i<.;~ 0 0 250 ml D 0 No Prescrv 0 0
Gross Alph.t 0 D l.OOH ml D 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) I;B 0 Sample Yolumc 0 00 0 lil
c~ lor i ~c Ifprcserva!iv~ is used, spcciJy
Type and QuantityofPreservative:
_Final Depth I :>:>SA.> Sample Time ~i_D-'-l-=>_7
___ ..,.
§ ~ Sec instruction
~onnncnt
Ar••li.:J. Oil :),+c c.L+ 100<.1 · ·-r::nncr 0<\nj... Gccf"r;l\ prebc/)1-·f-;.> LO//.c."C.. ~ ~)CtJ'J?p)&.'::,
(. 'I '!' \ \ 1-\0\'., '"'·\\ b '\ r '·.'•c.hr V.:,Li.S c\e:.etl -) ~'""'P c~ c,;,:; I ~c.-1~ to · .::. w iTh "" . c-.· t:. , .,.. ,
L~~l ~itc ~t IOib
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Mill-Groundwat~r Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 R~Y-7 _:
Groundwater MonitoringQua:ity Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA UR<\~JUM MILL
FIELDDATA \VORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description ofSampllng Event: [?i'?' wf"r fJr tr-.... c '2o (t_.
St!c in~troc1 ion
Location (wen name): ... l ... ·r"'"'.c:"'"'Z..:~--u=·=3, __________ __,
Sampler Name
and initials: l't;nne• Hvll;j,..._;/.,.-tl
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging !4/;::..j/ Zu 13 and Sampling (if different) 1--:....M_,_I:.._, .!------------~
Wen Purging Equip Used: @]pump or 00 bailc[ Well Pump (if other than Bennet} L32Zh'-----------~
Purging Method Used: (g]2 casings (g]3 casings
Sampling Event l Q..,.,Q..,..f'-r \:1 N ;fr.;,fe. Pre\-_ Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._I ~ __ -___ ?_;_c_-z._-_c_z. __ ---'
pH Ruffer 7.0 I 7, U '---'~-------' pH Ruffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance Lfli{ ____ _,l ~tMHOSi em Well Depth(O.O 1 [t): ._I _o ____ _
Deplh to Water Before Purging l t.i ·:;. o 4'' Wclf ·~_o ___ ~,J,5:ih)
i" Well:_ D _(.367h)
Casing. Volume (V)
Conductance (a,·g) pH of Water (aYg) )2 3 "!>
Well Water Temp. (avg) lj.6i Redox Potcmial (E.h)l ZJ~~ Turl iclity.__l ...-7_, ;:::::5;...._ _ _,
Weather ConcL Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c !prior sampling event}!._'] .... (' ___ _,
Time l lcz.-1 I GaL Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 3'3~{. I pH I }'2. 3:) I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. ·;>c I iLl Kl I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) l z~S I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 7·!> I Turbidity (NTU) L J
Time [ I GaL Purged I I Time I ] Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I C ouduc tm1ce I I pH I I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mY) I I Redox Potential Eb (mY) I I
Turbidity (NTU) [ I Turbidi1y (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Fielrt Data Worksheet for GroundwatN
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit
Gmundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAPI
Volume of \Vater Purged () gallon(s)
Ptunping Rate Calculatioq
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60= I 0
Time to evacuate two ca.o;in~ volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing vo lumcs evacuated {if other than I\VO) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs !tWAL
Sample Takc11 Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
VO(s
Nutrients
J-1 ..::.1\ y Metals
All Other Non Radiologies
Gro!;s Alpha
Other tspccif)'}
chlon dc
tina! Dcprh ,_[9]--!y ...::cg_._,_ll=-· __ ___.
~ ~ l'i
k'ommcnt
y
D
!Sa
0
0
D
-ij)
N specified below)
0 3x4J) m!
0 tOO ml
0 250m!
0 250 ml
D l ,000 rnl
0 Sample \ olumc
Sample Time 11-.,....!_;i 0=-Z:::::.:::.S::.-. _ _,
y N y
0 0 HCL 0
0 'riO H~S04 ,ii}
0 0 HNOJ 0
0 0 No Pm.en·. 0
0 D HN03 0
0 gj 0
[fpn:scrvaliv..: is uscd, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See insm1ction
4rr~"c:l or' ::.>+c .:.J 1 01.~. ·-(.:11 nu .:tnti (r.;,rr •.) pres.,.,+ +~' c.:.Jle c.:f ~c\mpje-::..
S..:.vY1pl~.s. cc lledcJ. ~..:l ~-H, ~ bG\.It.r ~,t 102.S _ w~h:r we•.~ c[ea.r.
Le+·l S.. :}c: (A.1--16 2..8
'----------==-__.1 Do not touch this cell (ShectNamc)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Grm:nclwatP.r
N
0
0
0
0
0
E
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
I ~ r See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I Z "~ Q v.o..r+~,... tJ ltrtA.f <-"ZD 13
Location (well name): L...II'_VJ_N_-_0_\ ------------'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~m?U" HolJ,'D\";\ IrE
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I L-\/1.:3/Z0 13 and Sampling (if different) ,N/./'J ~-~------~
Well Purging Equip Used: (]I] pump or @]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Gr v.n O\to S
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I O.v.o..r fcC"b /IJ • 4c/l\±< Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event l .... -r_w_tJ_-_D_7 _____ ___,
pH Buffer 7.0 1....._7_0 ___ _,
Specific Conductance L..l _"'...:..q~l\~ __ __.l~AMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging I 5 '-\ . 7 fo
Conductance (avg) ~ . .
pH Buffer 4.0 '-\.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I 112. S D
Casing Y olume (Y)
pH of Water (avg)
4" w 11:1 ~1-70 1.653h)
3" Well:.__ -=D"--_ ___,(.367h)
7. 5"3
Well Water Temp. (avg) I J9. bl Redox Potential (Eh)l ~ C:. L. Tu.rbidityjlO. 6.5
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling eventll,__.5_6 __ _.
Time l l:~~t_~. I Gal. Purged I "-0 I Time I tx J I Gal. Purged 17< I
08'32.
Conductance I gs~ I pH l 7.3'i I og7.3 I pH I -;. '51:. Conductance I S S?. I
Temp. oc I l9.bR I Temp. °C I ,q_,j I
Redox Potential Eh (mY) I qb=, I Redox Potential Eh (mY) I g{::g I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~.~ I Turbidity (NTU) I ... , I
Time I·· .;.::tt · I Gal. Purged I z~ I Time I.(\. <-+-=., .• I Gal. Purged 11-:h I
b 8~~ Conductance I ZS'3 I pH I -; biS I D83S
Conductance I 8'5"Z I pHI J.l2 I
Temp. oc I f9 .-b5 I Temp. oc I 19. r./ I
Redox Potential Eh (mY) 19fzl I Redox Potential Eh (mY) I 45F I
Turbidity (NTU) I ,0.1 I Turbidity (NTU) I 10.~ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2.
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 'fb gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S/60 = I \?...
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I 6 . 2.& I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated l o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs!._ ,_,A'-''W,__....A'-'L:::..-____ ___...
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients [] 0 lOOm! 0 ~ H2S04 10 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) !11 0 Sample volume 0 Ql 0 ~
L.V\ \of'i~c If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 71.1 Y Sample Time I DK3S
See instruction
Comment
A <"f ;\l~~ on !>;tG 01.+ 082~ ~flY'Jcr ""'fl~ G-fArr :, pr~!.-el7+ -for p\Ar~c_ t.1flrA ..St.~Mp};~ evtr'J"T .
?""r~t:. bc~o-,f\ 01.-\-0 ~ 2/, g,..,~GA v-)dl +or fA .f..o-)-o.l of ~ M:rw .. tc~. Wc7\.+Cy-~.S
Gleo.r _ Pvv-~~ Gl1c).~ .,._,.,£\ ~~I'Y)pk.S Co 11 ~d-e~ d 0g35.
L.&t-sri-(; <AT o837
TWN-01 04-23-2013 )Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ,2nA a l)..t.A,.r+CI" J\J .} I"'-+<-'2...013
Location (well name):l ._1\_w_:V_-_o_z. _________ _..
Sampler Name
and initials: rr"'nne• RoJI.j '!d 7TH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I ll/ '2..'-')/ ?..O ~ and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: lTI I pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv.o::r+Gr}j I'J,"+r~4<
pH Buffer 7.0 '-1 ....,;7'-, 0~----l
1
1w.N-03
Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event '-------------'
pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance I"---'"1_Zf1 ____ _,l~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.O 1ft): ._I 'f_£_._(J5 ___ --'
Depth to Water Before Purging I 'L /.=to Casing Volume (V) 4" Well;' 4Lf .Sj ,(.653h)
3'' Well:'-_o ___ ~. (.367h)
Conductance (avg) .___,':s=~.......,_\ q....._ ____ ---' pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I }L\. \1 Redox Potential (Eh)l 3'-tf TurbidityiL.,..:::o;_,___---'
Weather Con d. Ext'! Am b. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)!,__ 1_6 __ __,
Time I OGfi'-1 I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ~'1\q I pH I (,:71 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc !)L\. \1 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I :)b~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged b gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate ( ), in gpm. Time to evacuate two a, ing volumes (2V)
S/60 = ~~) g:..._. '-=---------1 T=2V/Q =I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) j D
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I A_W_A_C _____ -'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N spcr..:ilied below) y N y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients f) 0 100 ml 0 n H2S04 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non RadiologieS:_ 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 l9 0
Ghlor;~e
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1'--'-'7_8_. 'l...;..;j£-.-_-' Sample Time I 0'9~'5
See instruction
Comment
rt r1 ;\)<!'a on ~;+c. 11\.+-O'!Li"Z.. -j,.,cr 1:\,d-, G-{Arr··,.,
s~M p lc..s. (6 n~~"h;~ ,-r-I~ Li::,' 1.0 \ter
p rc~cn+ h c.o 1/t:c+-.s~ mpJ..::.S ..
W4.0 clt;c..r, Le+i-S•fc. o..& 0Gf~8
TWN .. 02 04 .. 24 .. 2013 joo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of2
Mil<· Groundwater Dis~harge Permit Date: 04/04/B Rev. 7.
Groundwater Monitoring Quality A;surance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 ~~ WHITE MESA URANIUM .\ULL sa instn11.:ti••t1 ---~~LRGYFU~L.5
BELD llATA WORKSHEET fOR GROUND"WATER
Description of Sampling Event: C '2.. r~.. Q uc~ rT <:I I\.) ;l.'\-r ;-. """T_..:._'Z..----:CJ-,~3-----------------.
Sampler Name
Location (well name); l 'lwAJ -():::) and initials: ! ~Vlfl(r HaJI.s:\t~t(}l
Field Sample ID 1·-r\1\}A) -03 __ 0 '1 Z l..j 2 C I 3
Date and Time for Purging I YIZ3/2D 13 and Sampling (if different)
Well Pmging Equip Used: ~pump or [QJ bailer Well Pwnp (if ol11er than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 002 casings @]3 casings
\.. I 'i: 1 --r:~t\)-18' ~11npli11g F.vcnl -3:: Q w,~T r-\:t> Ahrre... T< Prcv. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ._ __________ _J
pH Auf(C'r 7.0 --z.o
Specific Conductance ._I -'1.....,1w1-~-~-'l).!MH0S/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging [ ~b .3D
Conductance (avg) ~b.o j '-~~----
pH Ruffer 4 0 Li .O
\VellDcpth(O.Oift): ! 'l.b ()0
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" \ ~u :j 3iS t-lts j<-651h) . ·· ·w 11. ... _ --=-·a __ _.u o7h)
Well \Vater Ternp. (avg) Redox Potential ( El Turbidit -[L ..:..;10"-' !.-'-· J __ _.
Ext'( Am b. Temp. •c (prior sampling event).._!-"~::..5._· ' __ ........
Time I \?.~!::> ] Gal. Purged 17 3 I Tune I I Gal. Purged I I
~'lW.hn: I IIICC I 2S b0 I pH I 7.r..n I COlldUC{ilf1CC I I pH I I
·rem . ~c I 11-{.7] l Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (rnV) I 42t:) I Redox Potential Eh (Ill V) ) I
Turbidity {NTU) I IO I I Turbidity (NTU) I. I
Time I 09'3-? I GaL Pmgcd I 0 l Time )0<[]>7 I GaL Purged I a I
Conductance I Z.b 1'2 .. I pH I 7.'-i7 I Conductance !:LbDi I pH )7.Lj£ I
Temp. oc l 1"1 ·2...~~ Temp. °C IJ<·L3i I
Redox Potc1Hial Eh (mY} I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTL! I I Turbidity (NHJ) I I
Wtiite Me~a Mill
Fi,ld Data Worksheet for Gr::Jundwater
MiH • Groundw~ter Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev_ 7 3
Grnundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of W<~Lcr Purged L..:Z:....l.$:~---_. gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate ). in gpm.
S!GO = jr--~1:"'=2..:---="---Time to evacuate two casmg volumes (2V)
T=2VIQ= I £.94 I
Number of casing volmnes evacuated (if other than two)
lfwell evacuated to dryness. number of gallons evacuated [%--~ ] 5Y
Name of Certified Analytical LaboralOry if Other Timn Energy Labs ( AW 1-
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if olhcr than as Preservative T ypc
y N spc...ified !.:elm\' 1 y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
IN"ulricms ~ 0 lOOm! 0 ~ H2S04 ~ 0
Hc.n_r Metals 0 0 250 ml D 0 HNOi 0 0
All Other Non RadioJugiL:s 0 0 250m! 0 0 No Presen 0 0
I( rrvss Alpha 0 0 l ,000 ml 0 0 HNOJ 0 0
Other (specify) m D Sample vohunc 0 6J 0 ~
Chlor; · c If preservative it; useJ, spe..:ify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
r im1l Depth ._I q_,_-.... i _. :'_.J..._1 ___ _. Sample Time
~ ~ See instruction
!Comment
Arr •\lc.>j_ Of\ ~S.··h: ,.(t \1.'-\7 ·~r111cr tn t\ C'l.\rr :,., f t.>::n:n1 \~1 f <;~e ?"'~e .hejtl\f1 c\+ lZ.Si
P ...... r~~ wc::l\ or \..{ IY'I '"\<'".-\( ~nc\ D -ec.on~~ ~~~~ l~c\ well .r )
w<'<-fec-WC.':l. c.\cM. P .. r~e enJe'"\ ~t )2.~. Lc.\-.S.t·'-1-:: ~t 12...,)'lf \'.\
Arr· •.Pc C•\ '~·4c. • + o<("11 ·~-•. ~.-~ '~ (;. !"(•IJ Drn.(, .1 i> ~o lleci ~(!I'V)ries Oe-p l ic w-cfu WCi_S
b.-;. I le .\ d-D '1 :)5. ,J r .~ -h: q-1 crrS1
l....--=--~=---=:.._ _ _.JIDo not touch this (ell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Workshe~t for Grounctwater A 2 or; capturx~ C:OMF'A'l'IBLE Wl'rH~u,~·ri:--FUNCflON"Lil
~ill-Groutdwater Disr.harge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.:
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1~2
WHITE MESA URANIUM. MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
DcKriptiooofSarn~~g~~~ 1.~2~"-J~~c~~~A~~~+~c~r~~~~~.r~·~J~e~~z_o_J~3~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sampler Name
and initials: Ftt)oer Ho 1J Location (well name): .._l_:rL.;w~-~=---~c~~+-~-~~~~------~ 1/--rtl '
field Sample ID
Date and Time for Pttrging I i...lf2.3 /t.u'!'?:> and Sampling (if different)
Well P1trgi11g Equip Used: [f!]pump or I 0 I bailer Well Pump (if other than Bcnncl)
Purging Method Used: [![)2 casings (g]3 casings
Samplh1g Event I Qv..~.,r ·toerb .N . fr::Jc.. PreY_ Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ·-rwJJ ·~ 0 I
pH RutTer 7 0 .__/.:...;;.D~-----J
Spcci.l1c Conductance I ~~..~"I ___ .....JI ~~MHOS! em
Depth to Water Before Purging I 4 6../ u
Conductance (avg) i C'JO
pH Hu ffcr 4 o j ._ _j...l...,;D:.-· ___ _,
WelT DcpthfO.o L fl): I i·z..s . "1 o
Casing Volume (V) 4" \Vcn :r SI.Sf? ,.ti,. h)
J'' W·ll..__ -~~-_.C-367hl
pH of\Vatcr(avg) LJ ........... tl-""".5=-------'
\Vel! \Vater Temp. (avg) J } j .~n I Redox Potential 1 lrtj t.j I.~ Tu hidiryj1~5:::'..:.:~6~--~
Weather Cond .
\
\ 1 '\ -, ~ ~ v\. Ext't Am b. Temp. ~c (prior sampling event)], -!b~· ~~--'
(.., 0 "'-~"') C\f"'lt:-1... vv , .ch !) -
~------~~--~~--~~----~
Time ~ I GaL Purged Llo~ I Time I D9w I Gal. Purged J /2.0 I
Conductance I j OT] I pH Lb '17 I Cunduc:tance I \07J J pH [b.~S ~
Temp. °C r ]j .~l:. I Temp. oc l L':Llil J
Redox Potential Eh (mV} I ~~g I Redox Potential Eh (mY) ] "iiZ J
Turbidity (NTU) I 5 .1 J Turbidity (NTU) l 5".0 J
Time I()Gj 21 I GaL Purged I I z_, ! Time [Q:t~~ I GaL Purged [ht I
Conductance ! l 0 t:.h ! pH I b.c(5 I Conductance I i o~<l I pH [~.2LC) I
Temp. oc I lj .£.:,0 I Temp. oc j }L{ ~'7 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV} I YIK I Redox Potential Eh (mV) ~ j.s< I
Turbidity (NTl.J) I 5 .0 I Turbidity (NTU) I L.Vl J
White M~~" MiH
Field Data Work$heP.r for Groundwater A 1 of; ca pturx COf.f Po\ riB l E Wl Tl-l _,../"( ... /,._,,,;1{~---FlJN(TIQNALil
M~l-Grounr."\vater Discharge Permft Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitori!lg Qu .. lity Assurance Plan jQAP)
Volume or Water Purged IL.LiY_,_"4.:....' --~~--' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate ( ~). in gpnL Time to l! ·u.cu.ate two c:i, in g volumes (2V)
s;6o = ._I _r_z. __ -~ T=2V/Q=! ~ .S4 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated { Lf other than two) ( D
IfweU evacuated to d1yness, mm1ber of gallons evacuated
Name of Cenified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs '-(_...l}.£-:W:......:....A;..:..l-. _____ __.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate filiercd Prcscrvath c Added Type ofSnmpk if other than as Prcscrvati" c T y-pc
y
-y--ocs D
1:-.. utncn1s I:Sl
Heavy Metals 0
Ali Other Non Radiologies 0
Gross Alpha D
Other (specify) Ill
chlori ~{..
Final Depth ._! L\_,_··-'-7_'-\-=-q_,__ __ _,
~ a ~
K:ommcnt
Arr• IJe~ 0 (1 :+t:. c.J 'ID G.
f w_~e.-bt.!!.f" "-t 0'1 lO
Mos{~ G\~ tr.ro~~ ~~.......:
Lc~-t s ih· } o I 2.5
White Mes~ Mill
Field Data Work~heet 'or G1 oundwater
N specified below) y N y
D Jx40 rnl 0 D HCL D
0 l 00 Ill! 0 ~ H2S04 sa
0 250m! 0 0 HN03 0
0 250 ml 0 D No Preserv 0
0 lJlOO ml 0 0 HN03 0
0 Sample volume 0 ~ D
lf preservative is us.:d, tlpecif)·
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Sample Time
See instruction
·~nr1c • o._11d. &.ur :n pr~st:rr}--~r p'-tr~< tVlJ .~!<\"1fH~ ~vetd· r v..r:!Je{)... \;J.; l or ,. 4-otc'-\ 0~ \'2. M~flvJes . 1.J l r.r Wt
pv~..r~c. P. r~~ enJ~J. ~ll) .Sc\Mpi~.s coilec.+~J .,+ O•tzz.
N
D
0
0
0
0
~
A 2 of2 capturx· CO ... PATISI.E WllH/'{_J•I·O:'n--'VNCTIONALIT'
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
DescriptionofSamplingEvent: I 2 n {}\ Q v."'rf-cr tJ:f ro..f e '2..01~
See instruction
Location (well name): ._l_f _vJ--'{'J;.__-_0_1 _________ ___.
Sampler N arne
and initials: I ~t'H"' c.r Holi."J'\'1 /nl
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I Y / 'Z. 3/ "Z..O I~ and Sampling (if different) I ~ l z4/'Z.OJ.3
Well Purging Equip Used: [f[]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I G-r .... ,.,ID~
Purging Method Used: [][)2 casings @3 casings
Sampling Event jQ..,.,..(OO'f<rl~ ,N:~ r~'i"-t Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event L..l-rl_w_IJ_-_0_:-J_R _____ ___,
pH Buffer 7.0 /.C pH Buffer 4.0 14-0
Specific Conductance!.__ ....:.~_4_~ ___ __JI~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I I OS. 00
Depth to Water Before Purging I f>7 . D 'i Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l l }.71... ,(.653h)
3" Well: o (.367h) ._ ___ _.
Conductance (avg) )'1-G,b '-----~=------~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I ll·l-0'1 Redox Potential (Eh)l 'i'S& Turbidity! 21.-b
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event).__l5_0 __ ____,
Time I D"~S4 I Gal. Purged I lo I Time I ' I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I IL..b6 I pH 1"7 .'1 0 l Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I Jq,D9 I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I q~g I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 2l.r; I Turbidity (NTU) l J
Time I 0~7.1 I Gal. Purged I :0 I Time lo q-z.j I Gal. Purged I a I
Conductance li33 I pH 1 i .s:!> I Conductance I 7J.Z I pHI 7-55 I
Temp. °C I \ 'S. l'5b I Temp. °C I IS.ol I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-W~b-' I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I "l:s\ I Turbidity (NTU) ,. I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
f3-cfOf"(
Volume of Water Purged
Pumping Rate Calculation
I '"
Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
gallon(s)
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I I?:
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 1.'15 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I.._A'--W_A_L _____ __,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients l::fl 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2S04 IZI 0
Heavy Metals D 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies D 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha D 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 D 0
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume 0 ISJ 0 ~
Ch\or;J( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth J ) <5'3. C l Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
TWN-07 04-23-2013 Jno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
DescriptionofSamplingEvent: I :::t,ill Q \A~rt~r /l.),fr.,.4c. 'Z.DI3
See instruction
Location (well name): j'-_;.,..._w_N_-_o_7_R. ________ __.
Sampler Name
and initials: j::::r=: ... ,cr }-lo JI .(} ... ~/(H
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I ~-l/z:~/zol':!> and Sampling (if different) N/ A ~~~-------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [!!]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I (j..,...,.,J..fos
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event j Q u~.u.d c.r l.:j .N;"'l'r .... 'h.. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1~.-_N_V_A ________ _.
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance!._ ---'9'--1_.,1 ___ _..1~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I.__CJ ____ ~
Depth to Water Before Purging 1,__0 ___ _. Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~....:..0 ___ -11(.653h)
3" Well :_ 0 _ (.367h)
Conductance (avg) L-'2.;;_.;..:~..:::· '------------' pHofWater(avg) 'l.OC> ~--~~------------'
Well Water Temp. (avg) l ) q_. 8] Redox Potential (Eh)j 'Y l~ Turbidityi.._-=0=--------J
Weather Cond. Ext' I Am b. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)'-15_0 __ _.~
Time I o13-z_ I Gal. Purged I }'30 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I '2. ::, I pH l q.oo I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I ~~.g7 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I gr:.:, I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHJ I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged \SO gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I \'2...
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two ca ·ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
0
0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I _A_W_A_L ______ _,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y
VOCs D
NLHriems 00
Heavy Metals D
All Other Non Radiologies D
Gross Al pha D
Other (specify) ~
Final Depth I 0
Comment
Arr "ucO. bn .s...'t<. &..-\-o1\S
R ·.., s."' i<-b):l~., e-.1 OI?..D
(,.,..II Ot" \. o DJ: woJl'"r.
N specified below) y N y
D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
D lOOml D ~ H2S04 ~
D 250 ml D D HN03 D
D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
D Sample volume D ~ D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Sample Time D13j
See instruction
-(.,,.,,Hr ~..,J.-G--.r; " pf"<:.$~nf -Fo(' R ·n~~-t<
'P'"'MFeJ so C,....,lto,..J of ~o., p wt,..+-t/ """"" loc:>
P\A"'6~ enJe.J c:o.J D/2>~ L~tJ-s.r'-f<-o.t 0737
TWN-07R 04-23-2013 Ina not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
Kl
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
~~ ~~NERGYFCJI!!"LS
ATTACHMENT 1-2
See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FO"R GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I )OTI~ Q..,_.,.,<'tc:r 1\J t'4"r&..+c 2013
Location (well name): L..l _1\_w_tJ_---"1-=8'-------------'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1--r;:,n~(' HoiJ.j"~ J111
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging j '-\ I 'Z. '3 I '2.0 0 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: IT!) pump or @]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I G rLAn (}\fo~
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q V\01.r1'-ct'"!2) N ;}rl~"h:. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I Tw;J-OL-j
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance ._I ......;q:.....:~-~.1 ___ ---JI ~-tMHOS/ em
Depth to water Before Purging I S8. rz
Conductance (avg) '---'"2.='-· 3--=~=.k=----------'
pH Buffer 4.0 L\.b
Well Depth(O.Olft): I ) 95 · 00
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:l S b./3 1(.653h)
3" Well:,__ -=o'---_ __._(.367h)
pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I l11.' <A Redox Potential (Eh)[ l..\07 Turbidity[ 17. '-1 1
Ext' IAmb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event)IL.. _1.:..__" _ ____,
Time I )00\ I Gal. Purged I JD8 I Time I IDuZ I Gal. Purged I )40 I
Conductance I "27>7."E I pH I 7.ZI I Conductance I 7..337 I pHI 7.22 I
Temp. oc 1 I C\. z:o I Temp. oc 114 .llf I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 'iZ5~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I go7 I
Turbidity (NTU) I IB' I Turbidity (NTU) 1 17-7 _I
Time I 1oo3 I Gal. Purged I l3'G I Time I J(>D~ I Gal. Purged l l~~ I
Conductance I 433:8 I pH I 7 .3q I Conductance I -z.~~l I pH j-;t. Z? I
Temp. oc I 19-IR I Temp. oc I lg .I:?; I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 9 l5~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 9ZJb 1
Turbidity (NTU) I 17·0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 17.2 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate ~Q) in gprn.
S/60= I~ 1L.
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I 'f. 45 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0 .._ ___ _.
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1<---.;;;.D ___ _.
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1~-......:.A....:..-w..:..A.:...;L;__ ____ _.~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients [] 0 100 ml 0 !?l H2S04 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250m! 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) B1l 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 l5i
Ch \or;dG If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I GO . 0 7 Sample Time IDOY
See instruction
Comment
Arrive~ on sih. "'-} O~L\8 ---r;:nnd ~11~ {,.Mr:() 'Pr~..sctrf' ~or-pv.r~r ""'~ .S~IV'Ip I~ d~J.
'?w~~ bc~f' (1,1 0'152. f'u.r~c~ well -fo, ~ 1-o+"l o-f 1?. )'VI:n\A+~_s. wo..+er L.)a_s de~r.
'f'v..r~<:. 01~e~ W'l~ ..SO\WifiG.> c,o]\~c..~~J ~+ )Ooy. Le-tt ~ ,fc r..Y 1007
TWN -18 04-23-2013 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
i-...1il1-~:roundwa-t!""r Discharge ?erm-it
Groum:.i'.t:ate; i\1onftori,g CJ.Lt?titv As.sur:snce. Pfan {QAt-1}
ATTACIDIEl\1 f-2
\YHlTE MESA lJRAL'\HJi\1 \Ul.L
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET fORGRO£)'\DWATER
Dl .. 'scription 'Jf Sampling E;:cnr ·c_ .. 't-1+~~ -~h.L'lt.~~~r.rYJ-z ~lj-z,,£ J".,.:-f-c./
Sampler Name r-~,nu __ h./~~~(·-j ll}j --=· --Location <well name) I -rv:> -z~. ~~~~--~--------and initlals:
FielD Sample ID
D;:n(' ::md Timt:: for Pmging . b/ ~I -2. c:.. j ~ ___ ] and Sampling (if diff:.::rcnt.1 [ ,vrt) ____ · --··------
\Vd1 Pmgiug Eqd.p Used : [~jpump or n::n bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet}
Purging ivfcU10d Used: j ~ 2 casings f 0 j.> casings __ ]
Sampling E\cnt fQv-.t~.r+er{j Ch lurcSl,)nYl Prcv_ \VcH Sampled in Samplir1g Event ! -}l.v_-1_-_2_<-J_. ___ _
pH Buffer 7 0 [" '1.0 --:=J pH Burfcr 4 o ~J ' ()
Specific Conductance L • <f"l, ___ __j p1V1HOS.' c1n
Deprh to Water BefOre Purging 3L-~U Caslrtg Volume (V)
Conductance (aYgJ ,.-·-j _g ( --- -] pH of\Vatcr (;n:g.) ~ l--'--7 2 'L ___ _J
\\,.ell Wat.:r Temp. (avg) CirZ!I--~ Redox Potcutiai \E:L{ 7.]/S __ j
\Vcatller Cond.
Tim.: [63'2'1 Gal Purged ___ o __ ~
Conductance [ G I gg J pH -. -:1
Temp. ''C L 1 b . .:..~i-==-1
Redox Potential Eh (mV; -z./t--l
Turbidity (:-\TUJ
Time f_ ... __ ---,-...~ GaL Purged
CondrJdauce r-J pH
Temp. "C c ._~
Redox PotelUiat Eh (Ill V > .1
Turbidity (;-.JTUJ
r__:__
I ---!
'7 z:~
l Ext'1 Am b. Temp. 'C (prior sampling ~ent)[l~· _ J
Time --.J GaL Purged r ---,
-1
CondrKtancc ,--
L. --~ pH ---,
Temp. 0( ,--·· =.1
Redox Potential Eh {m V! l=-.. ~--~~-=]
Turbidity \~TU)
Time J,_ __ -_ I -_.J Gal. Purged f • __ J
Condlicraacc --·-' pH r-=..=~
Temp "C [__:J
Redox Potcntbll Ell (mVJ ---l -----~
Turbidity (NTU}
~-Ai~l -(j;cund~·J~~-;..;'r D-fscharg.'= Permit D~te: OLi/04,/13 Me''"'-7.:
GTouno~vatcr ~ ... ·1cn!tmH1g QL:atlt.y Asslit;;Jnce Pf.an (QA;:.j
Volume of Water Pmgcd r----0
-~----
gallon{s}
Flow Rate (Qt in ~pm. Time to C\'acuate two \..il~lig vohm1cs (2V)
s 6o = I_ .lii u __ =:] T = 2V:Q = I ~o___ --
Nwnber of ca:,ing ·mlumes evacuated ciC orhc:r than tv. o)
ffwell ..:vacuated to dryness. number of gallons eYi:1CUated
1\ame of Certified Analytical LJboratory if Ot!ler Than Energy Labs
Sample T akc:n S;;nnrlc Vr! !indicate
if mb;r th~u as
l l..; spe.c111;:d bclui).-,i
!] 0 ~'.'({(1 mt
[tJ 0 ifHJ ml
0 0 ~~5P ml
0 0 250 ml --0 0 1.!100 tnf
l!l 0 Sample \·dwn~:
----·---·~------1
·-------··----------------~
~Commerll -------------
A (I··\!<'~ c'1 s :-le '-'+ D.~ 2.1 --f,VlM;-prt: ,e/\+
1 wo.+er wo...~ c\ et,r. L~H -;.+~ c<-.~ 0~·n:!:>
.._ ___________ l iDo notroncb this c:ell (Sllee1Name)
I C-___ j
---~ I
r;W/\1-_·:-~
1---"""T'"----1 y ~\
0 1]}
0 ffl
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 g)
:Prcsc-r\atiYe Ty.-p~ Prcsc!TJti\ e /,dJ~d I
y \;
HO
H2S04
HNO<
r--:(1 PresetY
HNU~
0
Jfpre~erv~rli"'-_..C j5 Ub~.:d~ ~pecify
Type and Quantity otTrcserVtltlVe.
S~.;: in.sm1t:UorJ
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP}
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WffiTE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 2" a Q \1>,{,\f'f'(.,.. c. n I 0 ro'fo (I'Y'I "2.. 0 13
See instruction
Location (well name): l,__f :._w_4..:..---=;2:._'i,__ ________ __,~
Sampler Name
and initials: I --rO:'rtner HoJI,·J"J/--rH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I G./S /z.o !3 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [![)pump or @]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [![)2 casings @]3 casings
I -rw t.t-z.s Sampling Event I Q""c.~r±c."-1;-\ (.\.-, \ oro~rM Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event ,_ _________ ____.
pH Buffer 7.0 (,0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance !,_ -~.:..;~:....11 ____ --JI~-tMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I I )£..50
Depth to Water Before Purging I 6~. Sl Casing Volume (V) 4"Well:,3l.'f4 ,(.653h)
3" Well : 0 _(.367h) ....__ ___ ___.
Conductance (avg) '------!:~"-L1.:..~1 8z__ _____ --J pH of Water (avg) 6.11
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \ S,ll Redox Potential (Eh) I ?..'1 J Turbidity,_j ......:J~.J::_ _ _J
Weather Cond. Ext' IAmb. Temp. 0( (prior sampling event},_l _l3_0
__ .....J
Time I 08Jj I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ~11 g I pH I b.qq I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. °C I \S ,Jl I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ! 7...71 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) l I
Turbidity (NTU) I )'1, I Turbidity (NTU) l J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH ! I Conductance I I pHJ I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q.), in gpm.
S/60 = I 11.&0
Time to evacuate two ca ·ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) ()
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1~--"-A-'W_A.....:L'---------'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs rn 0 3x40 ml 0 rll HCL Cll D
Nutrients !11 0 100 ml 0 I] H2S04 ~ D
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250m! 0 0 No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 D D
Other (specify) (]] 0 Sample volume 0 1:9 D !:il
C~' or;J.( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I _b-'7'-'-, _../} ___ _. Sample Time l-1 0_8_1_<-___ _.
See instruction
Comment
Arr;veJ on srl-c ~i-ogos -lo.nr"r pc-e.s~tf"J -to c.oll~c.+ S"->"'1f>II!'S. .So.r11plc.s collec+~J. ,..} 081<
wd-er W6...) CicCI.(. LeJ1 s,'fe c...-1 08 20 '
TW4-24 06-05-2013 loo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP}
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
DescriptionofSamplingEvent: I 2nA Q\1\o..r+cr CYI Ior&forM C:o1~
See instruction
Location (well name): ~.....1_-=D_W_LJ_,__-_Z..S--=~----------~
Sampler Name
andinitials: I::Y:."ll'ler J<4o/J ,~"':\1/1!J
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ._I _G.--'-/-"'S.~.-/_2_0-'-IJ,__ ____ _, and Sampling (if different) 1--<c!::..=...!..l..:....:'lt _______ ___.
Well Purging Equip Used: IT[] pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) c o(\"f.'nv..ov...S
Purging Method Used: []!]2 casings (QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I.Q~r+c:rti Gn l o ... ~,..tYI Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event l._-r_w_LI_-_2_7 _____ __,
pH Buffer 7.0 {.0 pH Buffer 4.0 LJ.O
Specific Conductance ~....l _4~....1,__~l.....-----''!-lMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ~.-I ...:.1_:)_1-J __ g __ -.~
Depth to Water Before Purging I 5 g • g C> Casing Volume (V) 4" Weli:I Y:J. bA 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) ..........,.._ __ _,
Conductance (avg) ~ l C..'!.
~-----------'
pH of Water (avg) ._II_. 7_4 ______ ___.
WellWaterTemp.(avg) I \S.SJ Redox Potential (Eh)l 3c:7 Tur idicyj :S · '3
Weather Cond. Ext' IAmb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)~.-lJ_3_3 __ _,
Time I oi:S1 I Gal. Purged I a· I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ~)(;{. I pH I /'. )g I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I iS .S7 I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3'C7 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 5-~ I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
s/6o = I 1g.o
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ~-' .L..A.:..W--~.~A~L::...._ ____ __,
Type of Sample
VOCs
Nutrients
Heavy Metals
All Other Non Radiologies
Gross Alpha
Other (specify)
C \'\I o .-;de
Final Depth !,____ ____ _~
Comment
A~.-; \Jea. on ~~+( "'1-ol'·n
\.06-·hr wli...S G]co.,c. Le-~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered if other than as
y N specified below) y N
[lJ 0 3x40 ml D lSi
[E 0 100 ml D rn
0 0 250 ml D D
0 0 250 ml D D
0 0 1,000 ml D D
[jJ 0 Sample volume 0 []
Sample Time o '7S Z
f'rescrl'f +t> c_o)l~d S"-VVJplc-!:>.
{)I£~
TW4-25 06-05-2013 lDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Preservative Type Preservative Added
y N
HCL I5Zl D
H2S04 1]1 0
HN03 D D
No Preserv. D D
HN03 D D
0 (i]
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 7..., a Q -.A.o..rfe,... c:. h I 0 ro+on·•'1 '2 0 J3
See instruction
Location (well name): l.__""f_\,)_4;_-...;;.b_O _________ _.
Sampler Name
and initials: 11" ~Md /)oJ.!J':::) f&
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I t:. I I 3 I Z 013 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: (IDpump or @]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings @]3 casings
1
1"WY-)0
Sampling Event I Q\Ao..rhd.:1 G~ l oro'P>(WJ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-----------J
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance l.__'l_q_~ ____ _.l ~-tMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging ._I _0 ___ -'
Conductance (avg) L--.,_0.:........;.5~--------~
pH Buffer 4.0 y.o
Well Depth(O.Olft): l._o ____ _.
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" Well:~_o __ ____,,(.653h)
3" Well:_ 0 (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 2:3,..08 Redox Potential (Eh)j.__~_· __ ____, 1\arbi.dlty .._J _o __ __.
Weather Cond. Ext' IAmb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling eventl.._l z_o_" __ _.
Time ( 0 8Z1 I Gal. Purged I () I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I o.:; I pH 1 7,9'2~ Conductance I I pH I 1
Temp. oc 1 Z'?>.6S I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 30 ~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I () J Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I J Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q)1 in ~J(ffi-
S/60 = ._I ___ o _ _.
Time to evacuate two c~ ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I ...... A..:;.W___,/t-'--L _____ __.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
VGCs
Nutrients
Heavy Metals
All Other Non Radiologies
'Gross Alpha
Other (specify)
Ch\or;lc
Final Depth ._I __ o ____ -J
Comment
\"' L ... b o)-
GolJectcA
y N specified below) y
~ 0 3x40 ml 0
Ill 0 lOOm! 0
D 0 250 ml D
D D 250m! D
D D 1,000 ml D
~ D Sample volume D
Sample Time
C>8Z.S. --Jr.,.,rH:/' p-r~~~,+ +., coJJed-"'-
a.+ 0830. L~-+1 site 1/\-t 0833
D,I.
TW4-60 06-13-2013 IDa not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N y N
[SJ HCL El D
0 H2S04 ~ D
D HN03 0 D
D No Preserv. D D
D HN0.3 D D
~ D ~
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
D.I:
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
e'li,.,ERGYFCJELS
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ?-"~ Q'-"o..r fe r N l+r6.,+c. 20/.3
1_: See instruction
Location (well name): L_l_--r_w~N=...-__:;b;....O _________ ___,~
Sampler Name
andinitials: l -r~1'11l ~r i"J o//JJ"-!:111/i
Field Sample ID I -n,vtJ -bD -OL..J.:2 • .'5 20l.3
Date and Time for Purging I lj /25/:2.01.:3 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: jiDpump or [ill bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [g]2 casings [9]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q-.Ao..r--\-e.r l-1 N :+,..o.·h:: Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I~,..._'P_._· e_-z. __ 0_3 _____ __J
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance ._I _'\...;..9..;...,~ ___ _,1 ~MHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging ._I _0 ___ __,
Conductance (avg) ~,..._3_._G _______ ...J
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): 0
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" Well :~_o __ --tl(.653h)
3" Well: 0 . (.367h)
5.18
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lK (;o Redox Potential (Eh)I._I_G_'1 __ __, Turbidity._! 0 ___ _.
Weather Cond. Gl~· Ext'l Am b. Temp. oc (prior sampling event) 1 .......... 14_,_" __ __.
Time lc ~-:~ . I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
0/~~ I Conductance "3 .. ~ I pH I ;( ;.., I I .~.1 Conductance I I pH I I
lg .Go s.'lg
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I lb~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I t:> I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gem.
S/60 = I 0
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casin volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 0 .__ ____ _..
D
6
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs L.l ~...:AuW.::-~.;:ft:....:L::;:.._ ____ _.~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D ~ H2S04 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) HI D Sample volume D ail 0 il
ch1)rl~C. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ._I _ ____;_0 ___ _. Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
TWN-60 04-25-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
E'li.,.,ERGYFCJEL.S
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I "2";) Gv.~rtct' N•tf~ fc.. ZC> /.3
•' See instruction
Location (well name):l ._11...:.....:..w;;...:)J~---b5~----------'
Sampler N arne
and initials: I -r;.flllcr HDllJa..:1/-T)J
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I Y /t.3/2...0j) and Sampling (if different) !VI(\
Well Purging Equip Used: (1[]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 002 casings (9]3 casings
Sampling Event I G \A.o..r )crB ,AJ,}r ~"tc. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I "'I v?IJ-DY
pH Buffer 7.0 Ll ----.:7...:...0=-------~ pH Buffer 4.0 I L.\.D
Specific Conductance ._I _4 ...... ~......,~--------'~~.lMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): I )95. 60
Depth to Water Before Purging I 58, l'Z... Casing Volume (V) 4" Wcll :l S€.7:3 1(.653h)
3" Well: {; (.367h) '-..l...L-----1
Conductance ( avg) ..__,::2::::::.3=...0""!...__ ____ ----J pH of Water (avg) 7.'2...7
WellWaterTemp.(avg) I \L\.1& Redox Potential (Eh)l \.-j 07 Turbidityl 17. L/ 7
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·c (prior sampling event)I'---'7 -D __ _.
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. oc I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turoidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 04/04/13 Rev. 7.3
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
s16o = I rz
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I lf . q:s I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) D
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs .... l.:...:(},_W"--A_J.... _____ __,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml D 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ll D 100 ml D ~ H2S04 G D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 D 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 D HN03 0 0
Other (specify) I] D Sample volume D IX1 0 ~
L.~\oc ;~( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I bO ,0 \ Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
TWN-65 04-23-2013 lDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabC
Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Depth to Water Summary
@ estimated dry area
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing e 5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-12 temporary perched monitoring well
0 5582 showing elevation in feet amsl
TW.1_-~~86 temporary perched nitrate monitoring
V 0 well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
'il 5593 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-28 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5580 installed March, 2013 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING
b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
JilOTE:: 'MW-4, M,W-26, 'TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform welts; TW4-22, TW4-24-, TW4-25. and TWN-2 are nitrate oumoino wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2013 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE
H:/718000/aug13/Uwl0613.srf
FIGURE
C-1
TIME
837
934
844
846
924
918
928
911
908
724
831
756
745
750
931
1001
915
950
901
958
937
940
942
945
858
903
855
857
905
NAME: Garrin Palmer, Tanner Holliday
DATE: 6/27/2013
WELL Static level TIME WELL
Static
Level TIME WELL
MW-1 63.93 1033 MW-4 72.15 800 PIEZ-1
MW-2 109.89 1031 TW4-1 64.14 754 PIEZ-2
MW-3 83.05 1034 TW4-2 65.51 843 PIEZ-3
MW-3A 85.09 1038 TW4-3 51.35 1006 PIEZ-4
MW-5 106.37 1030 TW4-4 70.13 1008 PIEZ-5
MW-11 87.35 1040 TW4-5 58.65
MW-12 108.59 1029 TW4-6 69.32 854 TWN-1
MW-14 103.75 1032 TW4-7 65.03 851 TWN-2
MW-15 106.50 1036 TW4-8 65.05 846 TWN-3
MW-17 73.48 1039 TW4-9 56.40 841 TWN-4
MW-18 70.55 1037 TW4-10 57.05 835 TWN-5
MW-19 56.84 1035 TW4-11 57.30 826 TWN-6
MW-20 89.10 1014 TW4-12 41.98 833 TWN-7
MW-22 67.00 1018 TW4-13 47.50 828 TWN-8
MW-23 114.50 1020 TW4-14 85.78 802 TWN-9
MW-24 114.21 950 TW4-15 61.90 824 TWN-10
MW-25 73.28 947 TW4-16 60.36 818 TWN-11
MW-26 61.90 1004 TW4-17 74.90 816 TWN-12
MW-27 52.39 1000 TW4-18 56.65 805 TWN-13
MW-28 76.25 906 TW4-19 65.39 807 TWN-14
MW-29 101.85 951 TW4-20 59.60 822 TWN-15
MW-30 75.45 857 TW4-21 57.56 812 TWN-16
MW-31 67.50 953 TW4-22 56.55 809 TWN-17
MW-32 73.97 1026 TW4-23 64.14 849 TWN-18
MW-33 Dry 955 TW4-24 63.20 956 TWN-19
MW-34 108.00 853 TW4-25 57.30
MW-35 112.51 1027 TW4-26 62.68
MW-36 110.60 1026 TW4-27 81.65
MW-37 109.31 1016 TW4-28 36.70
1022 TW4-29 72.20
1024 TW4-30 78.02
1029 TW4-31 84.22
Static
Level
62.87
31.60
44.30
48.70
44.25
55.71
32.37
37.32
47.75
69.61
75.93
87.05
63.01
62.05
80.87
69.33
28.70
45.53
62.10
91.66
47.59
33.91
58.50
52.48
Some times may be the same since we split up to complete depth checks.
TIME WELL Static Level
NA DR-1 ABANDON
NA DR-2 ABANDON
823 DR-S 83.21
826 DR-6 94.33
852 DR-7 92.36
836 DR-8 51.07
833 DR-9 86.70
830 DR-10 78.18
734 DR-11 98.43
731 DR-12 89.55
728 DR-13 69.96
817 DR-14 76.54
741 DR-15 93.07
na DR-16 ABANDON
813 DR-17 64.95
na DR-18 ABANDON
803 DR-19 63.20
800 DR-20 55.29
855 DR-21 107.31
DR-22 DRY
756 DR-23 70.77
807 DR-24 44.10
na DR-25 ABANDON
)
Date t.--/ /1 ( 2_() \j
Weekly Inspection Form
Nam~u R o I I ~J~:r
Time Well Depth* Comments
ll.fOl MW-4 bg/1?. Flow 4.3
Meter G'ilCfO:Z.J
\~t MW-26 sq,lb Flow \D.~
Meter 3t'1l'3Z.,~
I~"S,o TW4-19 sq .i:s Flow )i.D
Meter t03373E;.D6
r ~ S"Z. TW4-20 S1.7! Flow g.q
Meter 55~l bS.S~
l'tO:t_ TW4-4 b~ .C(I; Flow t,. \
Meter r;,t.to77 ,g
.l';>ttS TWN-2 Zt;.l3 Flow HS-b
Meter ~ygs'f. 7
n'"lq TW4-22 .5'5.':16 Flow iK~
Meter 18'b It'"\
l'3qg TW4-24 ~ f,\.7..0 Flow Jg. \
Meter 603gt.{,~
r~Y\ TW4-25 Sl· \~ Flow jg ,L_ C-PM
Meter 1\Dif,\C{.b
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
('{e~o
des~ No
~ (~No
CYes) No
/Y~S\No
~e?jNo ......____
Qes)No
~No -~s)No
~ vTs No
("Yes) No
Tv~ No
(Jes)No
(Ye~ No ......-
~No
CJ'eS\ No
(YjS)No
( re-~ No ....____......
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
-
Weekly Inspection Form
Date \.j Is/ 1 3 Name <hvr•~ e.~ee
Time Well Depth* Comments -
1~1'-f MW-4 6$_15 Flow 4.'-l ~PA
Meter &'ttsc,7 .os
I "lll MW-26 Sf.52 Flow q .).... G-P~
Meter 31.£0l0."7l
1560 TW4-19 sq.q~ Flow IY.O
Meter lOSl~1g'.oa
J4D7 TW4-20 6q.2_0 Flow lD.o .h-1"1""\..
Meter s-s&n 3 r
JL-jJ~ TW4-4 ht/. '1 I Flow (! s 6 P>;N\
Meter 6111R' I. 40
1.356 TWN-2 ~1.50 Flow I $ 1 6-PI"'\.
Meter _;g71~."il
1401-f TW4-22 7{, "!0 Flow rs.o 6-PA
Meter ::l.t>~&.. ~I)
l'·l o I TW4-24 7~.16 Flow I 'l. o &-P.M.
Meter li.s"3.g2 80
.,52. TW4-25 s, . .s~ Flow I~ 3 ~I>P'\.
Meter t.:Z...246o.s-o
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Svstem Operational (If no note
anv Droblems/corrective actions)
~ No
<fes; No
(ie§J No
yeS) No -
(Y_,ei_)Jo
_(_Y~.No
Q'e~ No
~ No
deb No
cYebNo
~e§) No
~ No -r=:ves )No
">< ~ c_y es) No
(feS) No
(fe~ No
@No
@No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
) Date L.J/IS/zo 13
Time Well Depth*
i30b. MW-4 11.51
j"?JD~ MW-26 (;;.I.-so
li.fOO TW4-19 sq.~~
1-;,oo TW4-20 5g,75
,,,
~ TW4-4 7k,51
\L~~s TWN-2 2.3::,0
\'2..50 TW4-22 Sb.'Z.O
tz:i_i TW4-24 Gi .SS
l'Z. '1''2... TW4-25 f,().q6
Weekly Inspection Form
Name-,-;nner HoJ/,'j/5
Comments
Flow L.\ .'3 & f>iV\
Meter 7Y K 1~.50
Flow iO·I &PM
Meter ~ 1 ~CJ oS:tz..
Flow IY .0 G-PIV\
Meter IO{:.'IO-z.l .oo
Flow to 5 6P1"\
Meter 5Sbl_~1 .. Z.))
Flow g_~ 6-f M
Meter 7L.J'Z..bl,C.
Flow lK,<:J G-PM
Meter Y2.Sbb,4
Flow i f5 . o G-Pl'-\
Meter zzsCf7.s
Flow ~ /8'2.
Meter 196030~
Flow \K. \ G-PM
Meter ~~~ xct. I
System Operational (It no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
(YeS) No
eYes) No
C:ves) No
~No
CVA~No
C¥es.'l No
c Y<iS) No
7 yes> No
Q§)No
~)No -~No
~ No
~~No
l Ve_j) No ---
C:tes) No
(YeS) No
-
--c_ves) No
(Yes) No
'----'
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): .---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Monthly Depth Check Form
Date Y/lq ;zo[) Name --(c:nnc.r ~0 Jl;Jq_j G-a. rr .'" PC\ /mer
Time Well Depth* Time Well DeQth *
Q9jg MW-4 68.,5.1? ag_z.a_ TWN-1 .SS.b<6
Q92~ TW4-1 6-:lt 69 O~t-19 TWN-2 l9.~.1D
OC!D:l TW4-2 bb . '2..'2. 0~'-\f, TWN-3 3~·L.{j
O'ID~ TW4-3 51.78: O~!:JQ TWN-4 l-1]. 60
D9J:6 TW4-4 -:J.Q.L-4~ IDI'"t TWN-7 ~$;03
o~oq TW4-5 1~g .~ I (:1~~3 TWN-18 sg .. ~-1£
092.8 TW4-6 70 .16 lD3~ MW-27 .5:1 .. 7 5
Q92.n TW4-7 6..5.-70 ]QD~, MW-30 16-~S
~92.3 TW4-8 6,i 18 I OQ.2, MW-31 6.£>. '10
Qg"·z TW4-9 .56~6 9
oq 1·7.. TW4-10 5(.:,:)
Q9Q2. TW4-11 5J"61
Q9.3g TW4-12 ~,2. ~~
a~~2 TW4-13 '"1~. 2 ~
D9j!:j TW4-14 &~.I~
Q/f.S.8. TW4-15 73.23
0'100 TW4-16 f,b. -:5.7
IC22.3 TW4-17 7~.(;23
03~5 TW4-18 5'£ .I\
l£:25'l TW4-19 6J..o5"
ogs6 TW4-20 6Q~31
QS32 TW4-21 .ss£o g
o ~s!::. TW4-22 S1.6D
C>930 TW4-23 Q'.:..J.g~
Q8Sl. TW4-24 b3.'l0
(d 83£2 TW4-25 .5:6 .. 9!d
12933 TW4-26 6.'3.~ S.Q
09'17 TW4-27 .s?l egl.f
Comments: (Please note the well number for any comments)
_oq~g '[W~-1,8 .31~ 41
Q9~S lw~-2:~ ]2,. 35
o.~.~~ IW~-:?:aO 18.,15
0 9,i3 TW~ ... 31 fi5 .3o
)
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet
)
Weekly Inspection Form
Date y /22/13
Time Well DePth* Comments
l22g MW-4 72.JO Flow L-t. 3 6-PA
Meter ~61 e, l .ct3
i:Z..2.l MW-26 6L4~ Flow lo J-G-PP\
Meter 31&'~ t;'i 3D
I ::lYE TW4-19 5'1.L.J3 Flow P·L D 6-f> .M
Meter lOfl!:,y_gC_, o6
11.1&' TW4-20 _5g,70 Flow 9 .. 3 ?P~
Meter 5577 YZ .. 3c>
I:J.-:J..5, TW4-4 7t;Jsg Flow g .. L\ (-;-{lY\..
Meter _7'12~~ 43
/207 TWN-2 A.5 _r{() Flow HU _G-M
Meter Y&o42 .. J[
/:.21L..f TW4-22 5 6 . --, _C]__ Flow i.R.o GP~
Meter ;)_ L-15 h g_g
I ~ll \ TW4-24 A3.1D Flow Jg_.4 &PA
Meter .2ot.~71 11
l20LI TW4-25 ~5 ,JC> Flow f"J a b t;P/"\
Meter l451">_<;o . xo
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
(YeS) No
()19$) No
(YeS) No
~No
~No
~No
C{ii) No
6'e0No
(fe§) No
(reS) No
([ev No
C{e§) No
~-No
~ No
<fe~ No
(YeS) No
~-No
' (Y9S\ No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------.
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date '-) /2'11 13 Name ;:r;_,1,er J-}6)J,J4c
System Operational (If no note
Time Well De~th* Comments anv problems/corrective actions)
ll~l MW-4 1Z. lq Flow Y-~ C-PM. i_ Y-es ))Jo
Meter ?;5567. '2..0 (Yes ).Jo
~
1153 MW-26 f,).Y.O Flow JO.Z. &PM (Y~)No
Meter ~'2.o1sz..il!" Cves\No
~
'~ TW4-19 ..sq. '40 Flow J"i.O &PfV\ CY§§ )No
Meter ~ _CYes )No
11 b -w z:;z.. 0'1 -nr;o TW4-20 ~g . .b8' Flow 9 .3 &PM (_ves )'Jo
Meter 55Cf25l . .5'2., (Yes ~o -/
Jlb\ TW4-4 /0.0\ Flow 8.t1 &-PM C~}Jo
Meter gt{>8'[:z_ eves :)No
ll:3q TWN-2 28.)1 Flow l~.S U.Pfl\ ~.Yes)No
Meter SDD\~ . .3 C Yes ')Jo
11~1 TW4-22 s,7,0~ Flow 1.8".0 C·-PM (YaS_j)!o
Meter Z6'1 \0 .1-j (_ Yes ·)o
1 11..\Y TW4-24 b3, II Flow \8.~ ?Pt'-'J eves~
Meter '2.1'92. 07. '1 eves ~0
\\35 TW4-25 _52s.J_~ Flow )1.3 c-PM des~ No
Meter'ls6ZOtf ,L (__yes "'No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number):
----~-----------------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
j
Weekly Inspection Form
Date s-I;;/ Z()L} •
Time w·en Depth* Comments
J .116 MW-4 ;:,q ;(~ Flow t..1,.3 t; PM
Meter q 10qq _n2
1,120 MW-26 hl> 0 l Flow I() .. l f~.P M
Meter 3.22.7 1)3. c.o
1301 TW4-19 6?? .. L/R Flow I '1 .0 GPM
Meter 1 rt't3.5'1.1JS
j)..J-6 TW4-20 58 SO Flow q.B &P.A
Meter Sl:l_)~ II. 4 5
'11J2 TW4-4 h·q_qi...j Flow g.1 &PM
Meter gq~g,Loo
1245 TWN-2 ;uL 10 Flow jq,D ,t;:P.v\.
Meter .53~Q/" I(')
1132. TW4-22 ~5.£1() Flow 1.2,.i &P.M
Meter 2$Y7 Lgo
J1.3g' TW4-24 U~D2 Flow i/~q GPM
Meter 233A/.o .. zo
I:J....I)·o TW4-25 t;tl .. '15 Flow i ~. () & ., .).1\
Meter 1677£7 30
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
«e§J No
~eS) No
{Ye~ No
(YeS) No
<fe§J No
cY~ No
(Ye§) No
~ No
(Ye~ No
(ye§} No
{Vej)-No
/fes)No --~No
-ve~ No
(Ye~ No
~No -(Y~ No
-~No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Depth* Comments
J~51 MW-4 6'f.20 Flow L{' Ll 6-f?P\
Meter qt;~~o~ 76
I '1 "i 8 MW-26 f?/.4CJ Flow It~~. l CrPA
Meter .3;2.1.{7 :2:2. • 3s-
4S'\~ TW4-19 6>2.. I X' Flow l a..\.. a GP.AA
Meter 1137DII -r'o
jl.{L.il-{ TW4-20 /{I 2() Flow 10.0 &PA
Meter .562"1 36.,oc..t
j '1..5.5 TW4-4 7e>,o<; Flow ~. \ G-PX
Meter q t.i.56~: :l-3
t'-i2K TWN-2 2~-.50 Flow lfLt)' G-P .M
Meter _{76S3.Di
I 440 TW4-22 ~-6 .71 Flow If?. 4 C.i?J-A.
Meter 30t.i76.'-'!2
l Y3.2. TW4-24 {4 -~5" Flow i ~ ~ 2 C.P.A.-\.
Meter 2~xo 2s. qo
I ~.:15 TW4-25 S7.0S Flow UL .c; r~P~
Meter 1[1Efg'6.20
~
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv oroblems/corrective actions)
~No
<{es) No
Cfes\ No
C_Yes)No
([!iS>_ No
{(§_SJ No
....----.,.
(Yes] No
{{es) No
..--..
(Yes\.)Jo
(Yes) No -----
({es~No
('(e~No
{'feS) No
~No
~~ ((eO No
{Yes) No
{f_e!} No
f:{_es) No
-----------------------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
\ } i
Weekly Inspection Form
Date
System Operational (If no note
r ~ Wll e D th* ep1 c t ommen s bl J • ti ) any: ero ems correct1ve ac ons
1630 MW-4 72. K9 Flow y ~ _t; 17 fo'\-. ('1e$) No
Meter i 0 I q ~ L\., .57 (Yes) No
I r~ .2 :') MW-26 A'6. 3l Flow lo .<, r: PA ("'fes) No
Meter 3 2.6i 2.3. ~ q I (fe§) No
ID4'-t TW4-19 Gl.L\D Flow I L{ .o &t> .....v\. (1~, No
Meter I L$13.17.06 ~ No
lo:).o_ TW4-20 5~S. <;£ Flow ID.D G V.J-1\. (ieS) No
Meter .5 6t.tD 7q. ><O (Yes') No
i0>5 TW4-4 72 .L-(0 Flow 5?.:;L "PA ~No
Meter qq57.2 >{() C{_e~ No
J()Dq TWN-2 30.2o Flow I <1.6 &eA {YeS\ No
Meter hl3 77 _2.2 ('feS) No -
loiK TW4-22 _t:;5 Y3 Flow 15? .D &PJv\.. ~ No
Meter .3:2.37'1 qo (YeS) No
Joi5 TW4-24 A2.o5: Flow lg_.;;L GP~ (Ye~ No
Meter 26172.(!(. 7 /. (Ye~ No
I DOS TW4-25 S'i .. D~· Flow 17,5 GPpA-(ve§)No
Meter I ,g q_6-=z '1 6 B ({ev No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): -----------------------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date sl ?-8/ 1'3
Svstem Operational (If no note
~ W!ill Oept._* Com_n1ents anv Dro"''"'"'"'"'' re:etive ''· ;J lUI
!OlD MW-4 g :2 ,t; L-\ Flow ~ ;;.~1 ~ No
Meter j o5_2 f(.7 '1o (fe$1 No
Dqss MW-26 _b6. (jt:t Flow l 0.5 GP;--\ ~No
Meter 32€tt ;z.3~ J-8 {fe'?;; No
toJ2 TW4-19 6 () · Ol Flow l L{. (.)_ _c;p ..,.ut C[iii) No
Meter 11-tSCfi 40 00 ~No
DCf50 TW4-20 _.c;_g 6 i Flow 10~:2. &f>A ~No
Meter .5t,·_s·~~D t:;o ~s) No
'loo6 TW4-4 7.2 $'5 Flow ~ &PA @No
Meter l o ~ 2 B3 .% I.{. _@S) No
=-
) Ol.l2.R TWN-2 3D ,q_l) Flow Ft 6 r~ f' 1-A-Cfe~ No
I Meter 65676 70 (Ye~ No -
{)ct 46 TW4-22 55.'60 Flow IX'. 2 &-PJ.A /'~ No
Meter 5Y.2-og ,so {Y~ No
--=--
() ct 1./.:Z.. TW4-24 Go. 3~ Flow ·~ i~~~ rY_§~)No
Meter 2/77.2J) .40 (Ves_)No
() 9._3 '{ TW4-25 63,~t Flow 18 2. &P.fA... (YiSj No
Meter 1-D2l.06 S?O 7eS) No ----
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): -------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
J
Time
'\Z..-'1_5
i2-3-6
/2J2.
\(_':J 7
j'Z. 111
lZ.'S~
1240
t;J...36 I
[2 ?d
IZ, '>S
123)
11..-:J.D
1;:ua
LW8'
ltb6
12.-1:.']
rN£5
l'Z..i6
1\Sg
1?..5()
['L27
r~of
lc?.S
I J-1.2
12.2..::>
17.6'>
j2,t-\R
I \.58'
Well
MW-4
TW4-1
TW4-2
TW4-3
TW4-4
TW4-5
TW4-6
TW4-7
TW4-8
TW4-9
TW4-10
TW4-11
TW4-12
TW4-13
TW4-14
TW4-15
TW4-16
TW4-17
TW4-18
TW4-19
TW4-20
TW4-21
TW4-22
TW4-23
TW4-24
TW4-25
TW4-26
TW4-27
Monthly Depth Check Form
Depth*
7o,qS
~· L/ .6o
1)6.2.~
s1. o-z
69.9g
~~ ,5;6_21
69. q C)
~5.80·
66.oS:
51:., o;,
Si:.,.59
.; ]._5]
•:J1. L{Q
Lj 7. 7(
){f.._t:;o
(.~.71
6o .&:<
l~ .')9
S3 _g j
S9. C.S
st .t1
S7.35
Stj, 61
E:,6/l7
6 3".33
92.2]
Name 6-c--r,.:-, T ~......,e-r
Time
llS.b
12.0b
r~o5
t"Z../0
)z.W
l'Z.I)
·~
12. !lo
,z:L2.
I :1.12 <
l .:2.o~
l _1pP,
11.0 ~
Well
TWN-1
TWN-2
TWN-3
TWN-4
TWN-7
TWN-18
MW-27
MW-30
MW-31
TW4-28
TW4-29
TW4-30
TW4-31
Depth*
ss..zs
L{/. 20
3£:..?52
"17, 2..<.
87,01
s~.'<-5
~ SZ..CI'f
75.5
6z,g~
3 7 .. 1 (
72.76
Jf/,57
SJl:f.g6
Comments: (Please note the well number for any comments)
So-..er +i""'*') ./'A.'-Y bt. .f?., ........ x. b-c:.vt;v.Sc <A.J C,_ sel: -~ u( ·~o t.oAApl.-. .. fc_
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet
)
)
Date G-3-15
Time Well
10.3~ MW-4
t0.:71 MW-26
1 ?--5D TW4-19
102.7 TW4-20
ln~'7 TW4-4
~D L4 TWN-2
lo.2..1... TW4-22
/{')1!/ TW4-24
.
\0{~ TW4-25
Weekly Inspection Form
Depth* Comments
6'L6o Flow 4.3 6f'A
Meter ll1...ga..t'L63
&o. oo Flow lO. L.\ (,..PA
Meter ~3o66l. to
5CJ '-( 0 Flow r 4-.o 61<' A
Meter lli'..,h;).. 7 .oo
-"~-7.S Flow 10-1 G-PA
Meter S671q5.2, 20
6q.4l> Flow B .. b r~ffiA
Meter l e>"'3o.S~O I
:'5D.h5 Flow i!L c &P.M
Meter 6'lOLCl. 70
5JLq6 Flow lg.l.\. 1..-P.M
Meter :f~:25'l30
h~ '1.o Flow 17~5? t~PM
Meter ~q6ft3'.00
sg_.7~ Flow l ~. '1 t:,;P'....v\
Meter :2.1'7\l~, 5o
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
~:§)No
~No
eYE® No
Cfes) No
@'No
C{e~ No
(Ve"ID No
C{es) No
.....
&JNo
?f9V No
(Ye~ No
(Ye§) No -{Yes~ No
O'es)No
~
{!j__eiJ No
eYeR') No
<Yes)No
(Yes) No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
) * Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date tlulca Name 4rr~o.A..
Svstem Ooerational (If no note
Time Well De~th* Comments anv_problems/corrective action~)
I34Ll MW-4 7.2.80_ Flow L.-L 3 6-PA (t_es) No
Meter llt:li~D tb (Yes ~o
133'1 MW-26 ~o.RI Flow lt.?. 2 t-PA cfe~ No
Met_er 33.1.6 2.q. 40 ~No
_11135 TW4-19 6'0,.'·il Flow 14~0 6P/""\ (YeS) No
Meter l1LJ~ c:>O ~0 I cfe"$5 No
i.l3s TW4-20 l;' JL q~ Flow R 5 &PM QevNo
Meter _t::,6RtJID• ~2 ife~ No
-1350 TW4-4 6Cf..FcJ Flow !J,o C.P..N\ cleD No
Meter IPiq_.;z.l .RO (feS) No
1:>o5 TWN-2 .30.8C> Flow 12!,5 6-r:>M rYe~ No
Meter '13:7..~ 60 Cf__e§) No
13n TW4-22 s· r. t.'?, Flow iT~ &!?).-\ des) No
Meter 5~1-t.2:l _70 (Yes) No
1.311 TW4-24 6~.1..1 Flow i g_o c.,() ...... ~No
Meter 3652'-l. ~I @)No
l:J...So TW4-25 6'Lv.? Flow IS 5-b-PA cfii; No
Meter 2 1..5{) ::u . ~ de§) No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date 6i nln
Time Well Depth~ Comments
OllL./~ MW-4 6'7. 65 Flow 4.4. ;; D.A--1..
Meter I:Z.3S"7S.5'1
0 '1.3& MW-26 62.0'-\ Flow to.~ GP~
Meter 3.3L-f'1Zt.i.7s-
rt>&hi ll.iO TW4-19 60.3:1-Flow I t..\_o 6-PA
Meter 11 Q..06 3 5"".ut'~
(:5 q ':'! L1 TW4-20 5'1'r:SI Flow ;o.o t-J>..IA
Meter .5 7 o I 7-'l . :2.5:
·oq t.t.5 TW4-4 ?o. D2... Flow 8'. t 6-PM
Meter IIJ7osc._;>o
()l)) \ TWN-2 ~y 1?., Flow 18'.6 &~.M-
Meter 71, 4£16./o
r; Ci:SD TW4-22 .56 .. L.lo Flow L&_~o 6 P...v\.
Meter L1o1St go
, q 1..6 TW4-24 Flow lg'.o 6PM
57. 'iO Meter '.3170 .6' C(. '1'f~
D'Hl TW4-25 ~ct. 8'0 Flow 1t~l &Pf'v\.
Meter .;2..31{3.50 .DO
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problemsfcorrective actions)
(Ve~ No
(Ye_§) No
;fe§J No
/1'e~ No ...__
cf!?§) No
~No
_(Y_eJ) No
(feS) No -(Yey No
(Yes) No
(Ve1) No
(Yes) No
_...,
(Yes) No
?fe§ )Jo -
eYes) No
CYes) No
(re~No
(1e?) No --
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------=---------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
System Operational (If no note
rme W II e D th* ep1 c t ommen s I ) an~ Qroblems corrective act1ons
D71Cf MW-4 75_ (I Flow 4.4 6PA ~No
Meter 12qt,CJ3 , l.{O ~No
DllS MW-26 t£Lo7 Flow 10.:2-G·I'M @ No
Meter :J.:v;,_c;h L 2Y (ieS) No
0730 TW4-19 6:2..1'\ Flow \L{.o &P.M. @No
Meter I 2. '-loR/, u ,,.1'1 tfe?J No
_ill Jj TW4-20 scr .06 Flow In " r-.f'M. (ved\ No
Meter 51igqo -~£ 7{es) No
h7:l..3 TW4-4 6A .8'h Flow 1.'-t bP~ tfes) No
Meter 1.2 I.\ '7..2o _ .2V Cfe$) No
Dl 1.._C\ TWN-2 s\ ~o Flow i fL 7 &-f'A ~~ No
Meter ~D59!?, 6!? "@ No
070S TW4-22 t,(.._-:1.() Flow iS.i 6P.M_ r<iej) No
Meter l.l :l..:J..D{) . h I ?f~ No
0650 TW4-24 .<?.70 Flow '!1Jj {)?.~""'-C(e§) No
Meter 332351. 'It:> Cfe§J No
072.4.. TW4-25 5g.li6 Flow l~LO r..o~ rY6$5No
Meter 2'-l~bYD 3D t'f88) No -
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ----------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
TabD
Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
@ estimated dry area
MW·S perched monitoring well showing e 5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW04-t 2 temporary perched monitoring well
5583 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-10 hed . t "t . A temporary perc mtra e mom onng
y 5586 well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
Q 5593 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-28 temporary perched monitoring well
~5581 installed March, 2013 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING & 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2013 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE
H:l718000/may13/Uwl0313.srf
FIGURE
D-1
TabE
Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
a> 0 0
U1 0 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
~ 0 0
w 0
0
1\)
0
0
0
0
0
0
06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10 ~ z I ......
~
08/10/10 -(I)
""' r-(I) < (I)
02/26/11 0 < (I)
""' ::t
3
09/14/11 (I) -= .
C"
3
"'C 04/01/12 -
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
w 01 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
w 0 0
1\)
01 0
~ /
1\)
0 0
....
~ 0
1
I~
4~ .., ,
I
I
1
~
/ /
0 0
01
0 0 0 . 06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
-4 :e z I 1\)
~ -(I)
""' r-(I)
< (I)
0 < (I)
""' ::t
3 (I) -= .
C"
3
"'C -
~ p
0
w 01 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
w p
0
1\:)
01 0
1\:)
0 0
.....
01 0
.....
0 0
01
0
0
0
06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
-t :e z
I (,.)
~ -CD ..,
r-CD < CD
0 < CD ..,
::!
3 CD -:=
C"
3
"'C -
0> 0 0
01 0 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
~ 0 0
~
/
~
~
~
~
w 0
0
I
1\)
0
0
0 0
0 0
06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10 -4 :e z I ol:lo
~ . 08/10/10 -(I)
""'I
r-(I) < (I) -
02/26/11 0 < (I)
""'I
::!
3
09/14/11 (I) --:-+
C"
3
"'C 04/01/12 -
:
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
£~/90/90
G~/B~/0~
v •
< ~
-c.
E G~/~0/170
.c
= -Cl)
E t= ~ ~~v~/60 ... Cl) > 0
G) > Cl) ~ ~/9G/G0 ..J ...
Cl) -~
. ~ ~ ~ :> ~ \
~ II)
I 0~/0~/BO z ~
0~/GG/~0
.____
1---~ ~ ~
60/90/LO
90/B~/G~
,, 8 ~/90/90
-a.
E C::~HO/vO -.c
= -C1) < v
E
i= ~ ~/v~/60
'-C1) > 0
"i > C1) ~ ~/92:/2:0 ...J
'-C1) -~ <
CD I 0~/0~/80 z .
~ ~
60/90/LO
v ~
~
~
~
" ~ r---
v v
~ p
v 1/
0 <ri I'-
C\1 <ri I'-
<!> CXl 0
....
<!> 0> 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
<!> ~ 0
I
-
<!> 1\)
0
<!> 0 0
\
\
•
v
4(
\
~
CXl CXl 0
~\
CXl 0>
0
.
.
-
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
~ z I .......
~ -(I) -.:
r (I) < (I)
0 < (I) -.:
::!
3
(I) -:=
C" -3
"'C -
Ol (11
0
~ ~
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
Ol 0 0
(11
(11
0
(11
0
0
~ __..--y
""' (11
0
1 ----
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~·
-
""' 0 0
'
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
-t :e z I co
~ -CD "" r-CD < !.
0 < CD "" ::!
3
CD -:=
C" -3 "C -
-c.
E
.c
= -C1)
E
i= ...
C1) > 0
C1) > C1)
...1 ...
C1) -~
0)
I z ~
8 ~/GGH ~ .------,r------r---"'T""""---r------,-----,------,
8~/90/90
U/B~/0~
G~/~0/170
~ ~Jv ~160 -
~ ~/9G/G0 -
0~/0~/BO -
0~/ccHO -
60/90/LO -
BO/B ~/G ~ -+----+---+-----t---+------l~---+-------l
0 o)
l!')
0
6 <D
0
C\i <D
0
C')
<D
0 Lri <D
0 <ci <D
CXl w
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
CXl rv c.n
CXl rv 0
CXl CXl ...... ......
c.n 0
CXl 0 c.n
1------+------t------+-------+-----t-12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
. 08/10/10
02/26/11
-09/14/11
-04/01/12
. 10/18/12
• 05/06/13
~....-____ .J...._ ____ ....I.-____ --~.-____ ___._ ____ _., 11/22/13
-4 :e z I ......
0
~ -CD "" r-CD < CD
0 < CD "" ::t
3 CD -:=
C"
3
"0 -
-c.
E -.c . = -Cl> E
i= ....
Cl> > 0
Cl> > Cl> .J ....
Cl> -~ ,.... ,....
I z ~
£~/90/SO
G ~/8 ~/0 ~
G~/~0/vO
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/91::/GO
0 ~/0~/80
0 ~/GG/~0
0 ai <D
0
C\i
""'
£~/90/90
G~/8~/0~
-c.
E -.c ... -G~H0/170 -Q)
E
i= ....
Q) > 0 ~ ~/17~/60
Q) > Q)
..J ....
Q) -~ ~ ~/9G/GO
C\1 ,....
I z ~
0~/0~/80
0~/GG/~0
60/90/LO
'
0
0
0
LCi
0 0 q
1.{) .......
0
0 C\1
q
1.{)
C\1
~
t
\
1\
0 0 Cl)
~
0
LCi Cl)
~
0 0
""'"
q
1.{)
""'"
£~~~~~~~--------~--------~--------~--------~------~
£~/90/90 -
~~/8~/0~-
-Q.
E -.c . = ~~HO!vO · -Q)
E
i= ....
Q) > 0 ~~tv ~160
Q) > Q)
...J ....
Q) -~ ~ ~/9~~0
('I) ._
I z ~
0~/0~/80 -
0~/~~HO ·
60190/LO +---------+---------+----------1----------l-------~
~ 0 ~ 0 ~ m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
(·y) ~U!Od 6upnseaw Mo1as l,ndaa
-c.
E
.c
= -(I)
E i=
a.. (I) > 0
(I) > (I)
..J
a..
(I) -ca 3:
-.::t
T"" I z ~
8~/90/90
G ~/8 ~/0 ~
G~/~0/170
~ ~/17 ~/60
~ ~/9G/G0
0~/0~/80
0~/GG/~0
60/90/LO
.
.
q
C\J (!)
\ ~ IT
C\J
C\i (!)
I ~
'
'<1:
C\J (!)
~.
I
~ ~ r---.
~
C\J (!)
00
C\i (!)
0 C':i (!)
C\J C':i (!)
(!)
C':i (!)
-0.
E
.c
= -(I)
E
i=
J.. (I) > 0
(I) > (I)
.J
J..
(I) -~
It) ,....
I z 3: ....
£~/90/90
C: ~/B ~/0 ~
C: ~HO/vO
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/9C:/GO
0~/0~/BO
0 ~/C:C:/ ~0
60/90/LO .
C! 0 co
C!
C\1 co
..
•
~
~
I ~
I ~
0 C\i 0>
\
~
0 ..t-O>
8~/90/90
l ~/8 ~/0 ~
-a.
E
.c
..: -l~I~O!vO -Cl)
E
i= ....
Cl) > 0 ~ ~/v ~/60
Cl) > Cl)
...J ....
Cl) -~ ~ ~/9l/l0
(0
T"" I z ~ ~
0~/0~/80
0~/llHO
-c. E
.c
...:: --C1)
E
i=
a.. C1) > 0
C1) > C1)
...J
a..
C1) -~
I' ,....
I z 3: ....
£~~~~~~~------~------~------~------~~------~------,
£~/90/90 .
~~/B~/0~-
~~H0/170
~ ~/17 ~/60 -
~ ~/9~~0 -
0~/0~/BO
0 ~~~~1~0 -
60/90/LO -l---------l---------+-------+---------t--------1--------l
~ 0 ~ q ~ ~ ~ ~
(·y) JU!Od 6u!Jnseaw MOiaa LtJdaa
0 <0 (")
-...j
0
0
I
())
!='
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
(]1
0
0
...____
~ /
I
""' 0 0
~ r-----::::.
~~ ~
~
~
w 0 0
I\) 0 0
I
I
......
0 0 0 0
-
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02126/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
~ z
I ...... co
~ -(I)
""' r-(I) < (I)
0 < (I)
""' ::t
3 (I) -= .
C"
3
"'C -
-a.
E -.c
= -Cl)
E
i= .... Cl) > 0
Cl) > Cl)
..J .... Cl) -~
en ,....
I z
~
£~~~~~------~r-----~------.-------.-----~-------.-----.
£~/90/SO
c~/8~/0~
c~HO/vO
~ ~!v ~160
~ ~/9c~O
0~/0~/80 .
60/90/LO +----+----1------f----1----1-----+-----1
0
C\i 10
10
C\i 10
0 1.{)
10
£~/v~/80 < -Q.
E G~/W/vO
.c
= -C1)
E
i= o~/8~n ~ .... C1) > 0
C1) > C1)
.J .... 60/90/LO C1) -~
0 ('I)
I 3: :::!: 80/C::C::/C::O -
90/0~/0~ -
90/SC::/90
1\
k tJ ~ ~ "" ~ .t. --
«:::: ----"'
c::::==: ..
~ ~
~
0 0 00
£~/v~/80 t
\ -c.
E G~HO/vO
:a
~ -G> E
i= 0~/8~H ~ a.. ~ 0
G> > G> .J 60/90/LO a.. .
G> ... ~
or-
('t) ~ 80/2:2:/2:0 :5 -
90/0~/0~
90/BC::/90
~
~ ~
~
\ ~
'!
~
.!----"
I\
!----" ~
!----"
0 0 00
0
C\i 00
TabF
Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -1
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,646.96 5,648.09 1.13 112.5
5,600.38 02/06/09 47.71 46.58
5,599.99 07/21/09 48.10 46.97
5,600.26 09/21109 47.83 46.70
5,601.10 10/28/09 46.99 45.86
5,602.59 12114/09 45.50 44.37
5,600.55 03111110 47.54 46.41
5,600.66 05/11/10 47.43 46.30
5,599.18 09/29110 48.91 47.78
5,598.92 12/21110 49.17 48.04
5,598.29 02/28/11 49.80 48.67
5,597.80 06/21111 50.29 49.16
5,597.32 09/20/11 50.77 49.64
5,597.15 12/21111 50.94 49.81
5,596.54 03/27/12 51.55 50.42
5,596.52 06/28112 51.57 50.44
5,595.03 09/27/12 53.06 51.93
5,596.62 12/28112 51.47 50.34
5,593.54 03/28/13 54.55 53.42
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-2
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) {blw.LSD) Well
5,625.75 5,626.69 0.94 95
5,611.37 02/06/09 15.32 14.38
5,610.63 07/21/09 16.06 15.12
5,609.73 09/21/09 16.96 16.02
5,607.08 11/02/09 19.61 18.67
5,606.57 12/14/09 20.12 19.18
5,612.45 03/11/10 14.24 13.30
5,612.78 05/11/10 13.91 12.97
5,611.37 09/29/10 15.32 14.38
5,610.24 12/21/10 16.45 15.51
5,610.64 02/28/11 16.05 15.11
5,609.78 06/21/11 16.91 15.97
5609.79 09/20/11 16.90 15.96
5609.72 12/21/11 16.97 16.03
5,605.69 03/27/12 21.00 20.06
5,605.67 06/28/12 21.02 20.08
5,603.03 09/27/12 23.66 22.72
5,605.76 12/28/12 20.93 19.99
5,598.28 03/28/13 28.41 27.47
5,594.32 06/27/13 32.37 31.43
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -3
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,633.64 5,634.50 0.86 110
5,603.77 02/06/09 30.73 29.87
5,602.37 07/21/09 32.13 31.27
5,602.34 09121109 32.16 31.30
5,602.60 10/28/09 31.90 31.04
5,603.12 12114/09 31.38 30.52
5,602.90 03/11110 31.60 30.74
5,603.23 05/11110 31.27 30.41
5,602.86 09/29/10 31.64 30.78
5,603.35 12/21110 31.15 30.29
5,602.89 02/28/11 31.61 30.75
5,602.75 06/21/11 31.75 30.89
5,602.40 09/20/11 32.10 31.24
5,602.40 12/21111 32.10 31.24
5,601.70 03/27112 32.80 31.94
5,601.67 06/28112 32.83 31.97
5,600.50 09/27112 34.00 33.14
5,601.74 12/28112 32.76 31.90
5,598.60 03/28113 35 .90 35.04
5,597.18 06/27113 37.32 36.46
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -4
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,641.04 5,641.87 0.83 136
5,601.47 02/06/09 40.40 39.57
5,604.26 07/21109 37.61 36.78
5,605.02 09/21109 36.85 36.02
5,605.87 10/28/09 36.00 35.17
5,605.81 12/14/09 36.06 35.23
5,605.31 03/11110 36.56 35.73
5,605.36 05111110 36.51 35.68
5,604.59 09/29110 37.28 36.45
5,604.42 12/21110 37.45 36.62
5,603.69 02/28/11 38.18 37.35
5,603.36 06/21111 38.51 37.68
5,602.82 09/20/11 39.05 38.22
5,602.79 12/21/11 39.08 38.25
5,600.82 03/27/12 41.05 40.22
5,600.84 06/28112 41.03 40.20
5,598.47 09/27/12 43.40 42.57
5,600.86 12/28112 41.01 40.18
5,595.57 03/28/13 46.30 45.47
5,594.12 06/27113 47.75 46.92
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill · Well TWN -5
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) ( D) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,653.70 5,655.18 1.48 155
5,584.43 08/25/09 70.75 69.27
5,584.51 09/21109 70.67 69.19
5,584.54 11110/09 70.64 69.16
5,584.62 12/14/09 70.56 69.08
5,584.97 03111110 70.21 68.73
5,585.38 05111110 69.80 68.32
5,585.35 09/29/10 69.83 68.35
5,585.42 12/21/10 69.76 68.28
5,585.08 02/28111 70.10 68.62
5,585.38 06/21111 69.80 68.32
5,585.51 09/20/11 69.67 68.19
5,585.76 12/21/11 69.42 67.94
5,585.61 03/27/12 69.57 68.09
5,585.63 06/28/12 69.55 68.07
5,585.63 09/27112 69.55 68.07
5,585.90 12/28/12 69.28 67.80
5,585.68 03/28113 69.50 68.02
5,585.57 06/27/13 69.61 68.13
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-6
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,663.03 5,664.94 1.91 135
5,589.52 08/25/09 75.42 73.51
5,589.46 09/22/09 75.48 73.57
5,589.61 11/03/09 75.33 73.42
5,589.92 12/14/09 75.02 73.11
5,590.24 03/11/10 74.70 72.79
5,590.40 05/11/10 74.54 72.63
5,590.24 09/29/10 74.70 72.79
5,590.49 12/21/10 74.45 72.54
5,590.16 02/28/11 74.78 72.87
5,590.44 06/21111 74.50 72.59
5,590.35 09/20/11 74.59 72.68
5,590.67 12/21/11 74.27 72.36
5,590.34 03/27/12 74.60 72.69
5,590.32 06/28/12 74.62 72.71
5,589.77 09/27/12 75.17 73.26
5,589.67 12/28/12 75.27 73.36
5,589.45 03/28/13 75.49 73.58
5,589.01 06/27/13 75.93 74.02
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill · Well TWN-7
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.39 5,649.26 1.87 120
,5;2.56 08125/09 96.70 94.83
5,558.34 09/21109 90.92 89.05
5,558.82 11/10/09 90.44 88.57
5,558.96 12/14/09 90.30 88.43
5,559.54 03111110 89.72 87.85
5,559.60 05/11110 89.66 87.79
5,559.83 09/29110 89.43 87.56
5,559.00 12/21/10 90.26 88.39
5,559.68 02/28111 89.58 87.71
5,560.43 06/21111 88.83 86.96
5,560.46 09/20111 88.80 86.93
5,560.78 12/21/11 88.48 86.61
5,560.92 03/27/12 88.34 86.47
5,560.87 06/28/12 88.39 86.52
5,561.40 09/27112 87.86 85.99
5,561.50 12/28/12 87.76 85.89
5,562.01 03/28/13 87.25 85.38
5,562.21 06/27/13 87.05 85.18
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill · Well TWN -8
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,649.35 5,651.48 2.13 160
5,589.01 08/25/09 62.47 60.34
5,589.10 09/21109 62.38 60.25
5,589.09 11103/09 62.39 60.26
5,603.38 12114/09 48.10 45 .97
5,589.68 03/11/10 61.80 59.67
5,589.95 05/11/10 61.53 59.40
5,589.74 09/29/10 61.74 59.61
5,589.97 12/21/10 61.51 59.38
5,589.67 02/28/11 61.81 59.68
5,589.96 06/21111 61.52 59.39
5,589.82 09/20/11 61.66 59.53
5,590.18 12/21111 61.30 59.17
5,589.85 03/27/12 61.63 59.50
5,589.84 06/28112 61.64 59.51
5,589.28 09/27/12 62.20 60.07
5,589.18 12/28/12 62.30 60.17
5,588.95 03/28/13 62.53 60.40
5,588.47 06/27/13 63.01 60.88
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-9
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5.645.68 5,647.45 1.77 102.5
5,5 2.05 08/25/09 6.).40 63.63
5,582.12 09/22/09 65.33 63.56
5,582.27 11110/09 65.18 63.41
5,582.53 12114/09 64.92 63.15
5,582.92 03111110 64.53 62.76
5,583.06 05/11/10 64.39 62.62
5,583.25 09/29/10 64.20 62.43
5,583.57 12/21110 63.88 62.11
5,583.54 02/28/11 63.91 62.14
5,583.92 06/21111 63.53 61.76
5,584.04 09/20/11 63.41 61.64
5,587.42 12/21111 60.03 58.26
5,584.56 03/27112 62.89 61.12
5,584.55 06/28/12 62.90 61.13
5,584.85 09/27/12 62.6 60.83
5,585.24 12/28/12 62.21 60.44
5,585.35 03/28/13 62.10 60.33
5,585.40 06/27113 62.05 60.28
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-10
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) Riser (L) Monitorin£ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
2.35 107.5
5,584.18 08/25/09 82.80 80.45
5,584.40 09/22/09 82.58 80.23
5,584.61 11/10/09 82.37 80.02
5,584.90 12/14/09 82.08 79.73
5,585.21 03/11/10 81.77 79.42
5,585.42 05/11/10 81.56 79.21
5,585.42 09/29/10 81.56 79.21
5,585.68 12/21110 81.30 78.95
5,585.60 02/28/11 81.38 79.03
5,585.95 06/21/1 I 81.03 78.68
5,585.92 09/20111 81.06 78.71
5,586.22 12/21111 80.76 78.41
5,586.16 03/27/12 80.82 78.47
5,586.16 06/28/12 80.82 78.47
5,586.13 09/27/12 80.85 78.50
5,586.28 12/28112 80.70 78.35
5,586.28 03/28/13 80.70 78.35
5,586.11 06/27113 80.87 78.52
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-11
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,683.16 5,684.53 1.37 147.5
5,613.00 11/03/09 71.53 70.16
5,613.88 12114/09 70.65 69.28
5,614.65 03/11110 69.88 68.51
5,615.16 05/11110 69.37 68.00
5,614.93 09129110 69.60 68.23
5,615.09 12/21/10 69.44 68.07
5,614.96 02/28/11 69.57 68.20
5,615.12 06/21111 69.41 68.04
5,614.96 09/20111 69.57 68.20
5,615.18 12/21/11 69.35 67.98
5,615.11 03/27/12 69.42 68.05
5,615.12 06/28/12 69.41 68.04
5,615.03 09/27/12 69.50 68.13
5,615.28 12/28/12 69.25 67.88
5,615.40 03/28/13 69.13 67.76
5,615.20 06/27/13 69.33 67.96
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -12
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,667.03 5,668.24 1.21 115
5,628.33 11/03/09 39.91 38.70
5,628.86 12/14/09 39.38 38.17
5,630.27 03/11/10 37 .97 36.76
5,631 .64 05/11110 36.60 35.39
5,633.73 09/29/10 34.51 33.30
5,633.43 12/21/10 34.81 33.60
5,634.35 02/28111 33.89 32.68
5,635.95 06/21/1 I 32.29 31.08
5,636.44 09/20/11 31.80 30.59
5,638.93 12/2111 I 29.3I 28.10
5,639.69 03/27/12 28.55 27.34
5,639.74 06/28/12 28.50 27.29
5,640.90 09/27/12 27.34 26.I3
5,640.52 12/28/12 27.72 26.51
5,639.99 03/28/13 28.25 27.04
5,639.54 06/27113 28.70 27.49
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -13
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,633.04 5,634.32 1.28 120
5,586.95 11/03/09 47.37 46.09
5,587.22 12/14/09 47.10 45.82
5,587.45 03/11110 46.87 45.59
5,587.64 05/11110 46.68 45.40
5,587.37 09/29/10 46.95 45.67
5,587.77 12/21/10 46.55 45.27
5,587.64 02/28/11 46.68 45.40
5,587.89 06/21/11 46.43 45.15
5,588.03 09/20/11 46.29 45.01
5,588.30 12/21/11 46.02 44.74
5,588.32 03/27/12 46.00 44.72
5,588.30 06/28/12 46.02 44.74
5,588.51 09/27/12 45.81 44.53
5,588.71 12/28/12 45.61 44.33
5,588.87 03/28/13 45.45 44.17
5,588.79 06/27/13 45.53 44.25
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-14
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.80 5 49.53 1.73 135
5,586.18 11104/09 63.35 61.62
5,586.51 12114/09 63.02 61.29
5,586.71 03/11110 62.82 61.09
5,586.72 05/11110 62.81 61.08
5,586.53 09/29/10 63.00 61.27
5,586.80 12/21110 62.73 61.00
5,586.74 02/28/11 62.79 61.06
5,586.84 06/21111 62.69 60.96
5,586.73 09/20/11 62.80 61.07
5,586.98 12/21111 62.55 60.82
5,587.07 03/27/12 62.46 60.73
5,587.10 06/28/12 62.43 60.70
5,587.07 09/27/12 62.46 60.73
5,587.33 12/28/12 62.20 60.47
5,587.43 03/28113 62.10 60.37
5,587.43 06/27113 62.10 60.37
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -15
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD_) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5. 75.01 5,676.49 1.48 155
5,594.12 11110/09 82 .. 7 80.89
5,584.03 12/14/09 92.46 90.98
5,584.10 03111110 92.39 90.91
5,584.16 05/11110 92.33 90.85
5,584.26 09129110 92.23 90.75
5,584.30 12/21110 92.19 90.71
5,584.04 02/28/11 92.45 90.97
5,584.30 06/21111 92.19 90.71
5,584.37 09/20/11 92.12 90.64
5,584.49 12/21/11 92.00 90.52
5,584.47 03/27/12 92.02 90.54
5,584.49 06/28112 92.00 90.52
5,584.58 09/27/12 91.91 90.43
5,584.75 12/28/12 91.74 90.26
5,584.93 03/28/13 91.56 90.08
5,584.83 06/27113 91.66 90.18
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-16
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) ( 0) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,651.07 5.652.70 1.63 100
5,603.34 11104/09 49.36 47.73
5,603.56 12/14/09 49.14 47.51
5,603.84 03111/10 48.86 47.23
5,604.31 05111110 48.39 46.76
5,604.28 09/29110 48.42 46.79
5,604.39 12/21/10 48.31 46.68
5,604.20 02/28/11 48.50 46.87
5,604.55 06/21111 48.15 46.52
5,604.74 09/20/11 47.96 46.33
5,604.94 12/21111 47.76 46.13
5,604.84 03/27/12 47.86 46.23
5,604.85 06/28112 47.85 46.22
5,604.99 09/27/12 47.71 46.08
5,605.10 12/28/12 47.60 45.97
5,605.22 03/28113 47.48 45.85
5,605.11 06/27/13 47.59 45.96
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -17
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (L 'D) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,639.73 5,641.55 1.82 100
5,605.96 11104/09 35.59 33.77
5,606.27 12114/09 35.28 33.46
5,606.25 03/11110 35.30 33.48
5,606.55 05/11110 35.00 33.18
5,606.77 09/29/10 34.78 32.96
5,607.15 12/21110 34.40 32.58
5,606.96 02/28/11 34.59 32.77
5,607.22 06/21111 34.33 32.51
5,607.40 09/20/11 34.15 32.33
5,607.85 12/21111 33.70 31.88
5,607.67 03/27/12 33.88 32.06
5,607.68 06/28/12 33.87 32.05
5,607.76 09/27/12 33.79 31.97
5,608.08 12/28/12 33.47 31.65
5,607.91 03/28/13 33.64 31.82
5,607.64 06/27/13 33.91 32.09
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -18
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,643.95 5,645.45 1.50 100
5,586.85 11/02/09 58.60 57.10
5,600.14 12/14/09 45.31 43.81
5,587.36 03/11/10 58.09 56.59
5,587.71 05111/10 57.74 56.24
5,587.50 09129110 57.95 56.45
5,607.66 12/21110 37.79 36.29
5,587.35 02/28/11 58.10 56.60
5,587.71 06/21/11 57.74 56.24
5,587.65 09/20/11 57.80 56.30
5,587.95 12/21111 57.50 56.00
5,587.05 03/27/12 58.40 56.90
5,587.05 06/28/12 58.40 56.90
5,587.50 09/27/12 57.95 56.45
5,587.50 12/28/12 57.95 56.45
5,587.32 03/28/13 58.13 56.63
5,586.95 06/27/13 58.50 57.00
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -19
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~:; (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,661.36 1.77 110
5,606.17 11102/09 55.19 53.42
5,606.70 12/14/09 54.66 52.89
5,607.22 03/ll/10 54.14 52.37
5,607.89 05/11/10 53.47 51.70
5,607.98 09/29/10 53.38 51.61
5,608.41 12/21110 52.95 51.18
5,608.49 02/28/11 52.87 51.10
5,608.60 06/21111 52.76 50.99
5,609.17 09/20/11 52.19 50.42
5,608.90 12/21/11 52.46 50.69
5,608.87 03/27/12 52.49 50.72
5,608.86 06/28112 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 09/27112 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 12/28/12 52.50 50.73
5,609.17 03/28/13 52.19 50.42
5,608.88 06/27/13 52.48 50.71
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well MW -30
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) .(MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,613.34 5,614.50 1.16 110
5,534.92 10/24/2006 79.58 78.42
5,535.09 3116/2007 79.41 78.25
5,535.46 8/27/2007 79.04 77.88
5,535.06 10/15/2007 79.44 78.28
5,535.78 3/15/2008 78.72 77.56
5,536.26 6/15/2008 78.24 77.08
5,536.35 9/15/2008 78.15 76.99
5,536.68 11115/2008 77.82 76.66
5,535.42 3/15/2009 79.08 77.92
5,537.11 6/30/2009 77.39 76.23
5,536.93 9/10/2009 77.57 76.41
5,537.23 12/1112009 77.27 76.11
5,537.59 3/11/2010 76.91 75.75
5,537.85 5/11/2010 76.65 75.49
5,538.37 9/29/2010 76.13 74.97
5537.70 12/21/2010 76.8 75.64
5537.67 2/28/2011 76.83 75.67
5538.31 6/21/2011 76.19 75.03
5538.15 9/20/2011 76.35 75.19
5538.42 12/21/2011 76.08 74.92
5538.54 3/27/2012 75.96 74.8
5538.60 6/28/2012 75.9 74.74
5538.68 9/27/2012 75.82 74.66
5538.99 12/28/2012 75.51 74.35
5539.25 3/28/2013 75.25 74.09
5539.05 6/27/2013 75.45 74.29
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well MW-31
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitorin~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,615.26 5,616.40 1.14 130
5,544.07 10/24/2006 72.33 71.19
5,544.45 3116/2007 71.95 70.81
5,536.94 8/27/2007 79.46 78.32
5,544.62 10/15/2007 71.78 70.64
5,545.37 3115/2008 71.03 69.89
5,544.50 6/15/2008 71.90 70.76
5,545.94 9/15/2008 70.46 69.32
5,546.42 11/15/2008 69.98 68.84
5,546.03 3/15/2009 70.37 69.23
5,546.65 6/30/2009 69.75 68 .61
5,546.45 9/10/2009 69.95 68.81
5,546.75 12/1112009 69.65 68.51
5,547.09 3/1112010 69.31 68.17
5,547.41 511112010 68.99 67.85
5,547.28 9/29/2010 69.12 67.98
5547.45 12/21/2010 68.95 67.81
5547.37 2/28/2011 69.03 67.89
5547.96 6/2112011 68.44 67.3
5547.65 9/20/2011 68.75 67.61
5548.34 12/21/2011 68.06 66.92
5548.30 3/27/2012 68.10 66.96
5548.40 6/28/2012 68.00 66.86
5548.59 9/27/2012 67.81 66.67
5548.91 12/28/2012 67.49 66.35
5549.14 3/28/2013 67.26 66.12
5548.90 6/27/2013 67.50 66.36
TabG
Laboratory Analytical Reports
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-010
Client Sample ID: Piez-01_04242013
Collection Date: 4/24/2013 I OOOh
Received Date: 4/26/2013 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
4/29/2013 2146h E300.0 10.0
4/30/2013 2000h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
53.3
8.88
Report Date: 5/3/2013 Page 13 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed ln accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive w;e of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-011
Client Sample ID: Piez-02_04242013
Collection Date: 4/24/2013 1013h
Received Date: 4/26/2013 1015h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 4/29/2013 2210h E300.0 1.00 10.3
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 517/2013 2232h E353.2 0.100 0.172
A -Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
Report Date: 5/14/20 13 Page 14 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to N.ELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the rc.-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
lalt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-012
Client Sample ID: Piez-03_04242013
Collection Date: 4/24/2013 I 025h
Received Date: 4/26/2013 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mgfL
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
4/29/2013 2233b E300.0 5.00
4/30/2013 2003h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
21.2
1.83
Report Date: 5/3/20 13 Page 15 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. rertincnt sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in cmmection with the advcnisement:. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for' any
Anl('n«:an West
/lr~AI -, T CAl l Af',OAAT•)n fS
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
\
INQRGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-004
Client Sample ID: TWN-01_04232013
Collection Date: 4/23/2013 0835h
Received Date: 4/26/2013 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
4/29/2013 184lh E300.0 5.00
4/30/2013 1947h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
17.4
0.840
Report Date: 5/3/2013 Page 7 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation lc;; located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exc1usive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection ~ith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or process, or in coMection with the re-publication of this report for any
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
2nd Quarter Nitrate
1304696-008
/ ;,t T
Client Sample ID: TWN-02_04242013
'" T 'n ' c Collection Date: 4/24/2013 0945h
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
Received Date: 4/26/2013 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
4/29/2013 2100h E300.0 10.0
4/30/2013 1957h E353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
82.1
57.7
Report Date: 5/3/20 13 Page II of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is Located on the attacbed COC.. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc oft he name of this company or any member of its sraff, orreproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone:[phone]
foil Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-007
Client Sample ID: TWN-03_04242013
Collection Date: 4/24/2013 0935h
Received Date: 4/26/2013 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
4/29/2013 2037h E300.0 50.0
4/30/2013 1956h E353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
158
27.2
Report Date: 5/3/2013 Page I 0 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
ialt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-005
Client Sample ID: TWN-04_04232013
Collection Date: 4/23/2013 0922h
Received Date: 4/26/2013 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
4/29/2013 1950h E300.0 5.00
4/30/2013 1953h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
24.4
1.63
Report Date: 5/3/20 13 Page 8 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the ex.clusive use of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
foll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awa1-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-003
Client Sample ID: TWN-07 _04242013
Collection Date: 4/24/2013 0922h
Received Date: 4/26/2013 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
4/29/2013 1817h E300.0 1.00
4/30/2013 1946h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
5.88
1.16
Report Date: 5/3/20 13 Page 6 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of
• ~ '"'" -... -·· --t'·L=-----=-... ~-... ~,...; ...... ,.,;,'"' th ... ,.A., ... .-ti..,,-.mrnt nrnmntinn nr sale of anv nroduct or oroccss. or in connection wilh the rc~publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-001
Client Sample ID: TWN-07R_04232013
Collection Date: 4/23/2013 0734h
Received Date: 4/26/2013 1015h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 4/29/2013 1558h E300.0 1.00 < 1.00
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 4/30/2013 1943h E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of previously
issued reports.
Report Date: 5/14/20 13 Page 4 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfont1ed in at.:cordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the 11ddrcssee. Privileges of
--• "" · ""' · --·-· ' · . .: ___ c .. L:_ ----:_ ~~--... -·:~ .. ,.,;,~ ,.._,. .,,.1.,~,..; .. ,.,....,,."t ....-nnmtlnn nr <::1'111" nf~nv nrocluct or nrocCS.."-. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
lalt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-006
Client Sample ID: TWN-18_04232013
Collection Date: 4/23/2013 1004h
Received Date: 4/26/2013 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
4/29/2013 2013h E300.0 10.0
4/30/2013 203\h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
64.3
2.32
Report Date: 5/3/20 13 Page 9 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of thjs report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the rc·publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1306139-007
Client Sample ID: TW4-22_06052013
Collection Date: 6/5/2013 0830h
Received Date: 6/7/2013 1000h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
6110/2013 2339h E300.0 100
6/13/2013 1752h E353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
586
50.2
Report Date: 6/18/2013 Page II of29
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA arc perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infunnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive use ofthc addressee. Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this rcpm1 in connection with the ~dvertiscment, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
American West
ANAlYTICAl lABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1306139-002
Client Sample ID: TW4-24_06052013
Collection Date: 6/5/2013 0812h
Received Date: 6/7/2013 lOOOh
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
6/10/2013 2056h E300.0 100
6/13/2013 l738h E353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
916
23.7
Report Date: 6/18/2013 Page 6 of 29
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA nre perfonned in accordam:e to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the att<:~ched COC This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc of the nmne of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this rcp011 in connection with the advertisement, promotion or ~lc of any product or process, 01 in connection with the rc·publication oF this report For any
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1306139-001
Client Sample ID: TW4-25_06052013
Collection Date: 6/5/2013 0752h
Received Date: 6/7/2013 lOOOh
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Chloride mg/L 6/10/2013 1946h E300.0 50.0
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 6/13/2013 1737h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
136
5.24
Report Date: 6/18/2013 Page 5 of29
All analyses ~pplicabl~ to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive use oft he addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc of the n<~mc of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with rhc re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-002
Client Sample ID: TWN-60_04252013
Collection Date: 4/25/2013 0745h
Received Date: 4/26/2013 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
4/29/2013 l708h E300.0 1.00
4/30/2013 1945h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
< 1.00
< 0.100
Report Date: 5/3/2013 Page 5 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SOWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocolsJ rertincnt sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use oftbe addressee Privileges of
· "" ' '" ' .\. ---'··· -.a --___ ... ,~..:~-.. ~.t.:~ .............. ;.., ........... ..,,.,; ......... :.n ~h ... .,,J ..... .-ti ..... m,...nt nrnmntinn nr <:~1.-. nf Hnv nrrwitwt or nroccss. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
:lalt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1306288-006
Client Sample ID: TW4-60_06132013
Collection Date: 6/13/2013 830h
Received Date: 6/14/2013 1442h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
6/18/2013 024h E300.0 1.00
6/17/2013 1620h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
< 1.00
< 0.100
Report Date: 6/24/2013 Page I 0 of 29
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA nrc pcrtOnncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive liSe of the addressee Privilcgt's of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this rcp011 in l'Onncction with the odvcrtiscmcnt, promotion or sale of any product or p1 occss, or in connection with the rc·publil:ation of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-009
Client Sample ID: TWN-65_04232013
Collection Date: 4/23/2013 1004h
Received Date: 4/26/2013 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
4/29/2013 2123h E300.0 5.00
4/30/2013 2017h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
66.1
2.46
Report Date: 5/3/20 13 Page 12 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA. and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or Ralc of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1304696
American West Analytical Laboratories received 12 sample(s) on 4/26/2013 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
This is a revision to a report orignally issued 5/3/2013. Pages 1, 3, 4, 14, and 16-19 have
been revised.
Thank You, Kyle F. DigitallysignedbyKyleF.Gross
DN: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G email=kyle@awal-labs,com, c=US r 0 s s Date: 2013.05.1412:39:24 ·06'00'
Approved by: L-------------'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 5/14/2013 Page I ofl9
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is Located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of
-• 0 " • ,._ 1 ._: __ -C'•L: ____ _. ;_ -~--,....-:~ .. ,.,;11-. ol.,. '>~H~n:.,,....,,..nl nrmnntinn f'lr o;:~ll" nf~nV nmrluf"l 01" 01"0Ce&.'O. OT in COnnection Wilh the re~publication of this report for any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
;,• I 'fT ~!11 I.'• Ji1AT0n c Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Lab Set ID: 1304696
Date Received: 4/26/2013 1015h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South 1304696-00lA TWN-07R 04232013 4/23/2013 0734h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
)alt Lake City, UT 84115 1304696-001B TWN-07R 04232013 4/23/2013 0734h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1304696-002A TWN-60_04252013 4/25/2013 0745h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1304696-002B TWN-60 04252013 4/25/2013 0745h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Phone: [phone] 1304696-003A TWN-07_04242013 4/24/2013 0922h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Toll Free: [phone] 1304696-003B TWN-07 04242013 4/24/2013 0922h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: [phone] 1304696-004A TWN-01_04232013 4/23/2013 0835h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1304696-004B TWN-01_04232013 4/23/2013 0835h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
~-mail: [e-mail] 1304696-005A TWN-04 04232013 4/23/2013 0922h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1304696-005B TWN-04_04232013 4/23/2013 0922h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 web: www.awal-1abs.com 1304696-006A TWN-18 04232013 4/23/2013 1004h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1304696-006B TWN-18 04232013 4/23/2013 1004h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1304696-007 A TWN-03 04242013 4/24/2013 0935h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1304696-007B TWN-03 04242013 4/24/2013 0935h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Laboratory Director 1304696-008A TWN-02 04242013 4/24/2013 0945h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1304696-008B TWN-02 04242013 4/24/2013 0945h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Jose Rocha 1304696-009A TWN-65_04232013 4/23/2013 1004h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
QA Officer 1304696-009B TWN-65 04232013 4/23/2013 1004h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1304696-010A Piez-0 1_ 04 24 20 13 4/24/2013 1000h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1304696-01 OB Piez-01 04242013 4/24/2013 1000h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1304696-011A Piez-02_04242013 4/24/2013 1013h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1304696-011B Piez-02 04242013 4/24/2013 1013h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1304696-0 12A Piez-03 04242013 4/24/2013 1025h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1304696-012B Piez-03 04242013 4/24/2013 1025h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 5/3/20 13 Page 2 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA are pcrfonned in ac<:mdancc to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
-• -•-• • • • -.l -1·-_ _. ..... _ ----__ ___,___, ................ __ .__!_ .. .., .. _..,.,...,...tinn nr ""1,... nf~nvnnvlnrt nTnmf"M:<:: OT in r.nnnC"f"fiOO With the rC-DUblicatiOfi Of thiS re00rt for any
1\nwatr...;..lq W<•st
"r~ ;. 1 • r :. ", 1 t..,.., 'J ~ 1\ Ton 1 r s
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awa1-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
Revised Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
2nd Quarter Nitrate
1304696
4/26/2013
4/23, 4/24, and 4/25/2013
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 5/14/2013 Page 3 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the C!lciusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
--. • .... • ~ -----.J ••• .; __ ~~·1..:-r.-...... : .. -............... : ......... ,;, ... tho .. ~vrrt; ..... m ... nt nrnmntion nr ~lc ofanv nroduct or nrocess. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1304696
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R53633 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.48
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R53670 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.03
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R53945 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.04
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Units Method MDL
04/29/2013 1535h
mg!L E300.0 O.Dll4
04/30/2013 1936h
mg/L E353.2 0.00252 -05/07/20 13 214 7h
mg!L E353.2 0.00252
Reporting
Limit
1.00
0.100
0.100
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Amount
Spiked
5.000
1.000
1.000
Garrin Palmer
we
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0 89.6
0 103
0 104
"-Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
§-QC limits are set with an accuracy of two significant figures, therefore the recovery rounds to an acceptable value within the contra/limits.
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
§
Report Date: 5/14/2013 Page 16 of 19
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA arc performed in accon:lance lo NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the atlached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc oflhe addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of !he name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the rc·publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
;, ~ •. \ l " ,. .~ ,,
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1304696
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-R53633 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
04/29/20 13 1511 h
MDL
Reporting
Limit
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chloride < 1.00 mg/L E300.0 0.0114 1.00
Lab Sample ID: MB-R53670 Date Analyzed: 04/30/2013 1935h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) <0.100 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-R53945 Date Analyzed: 05/07/20 13 2144h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) < 0.100 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100 "
"-Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added. updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
Report Date: 5/14/2013 Page 17 of 19
t analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to N ELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1304696
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-00IAMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.70
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-002AMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.73
Lab Sample ID: 1304650-003DMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) !.59
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-0llBMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.13
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (801 ) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Units Method
04/29/2013 162Jh
mg/L E300.0
04/29/20 13 1731 h
mg/L E300.0
04/30/2013 2021 h
mg/L E353.2
05/07/2013 2233h
mg/L E353.2
MDL
0.0114
0.0114
0.00252
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
1.00
1.00
0.100
0.100
QC Type: MS
Amount
Spiked
5.000
5.000
1.000
1.000
Spike Ref.
Amount
0
0
0.618
0.172
%REC
94.0
94.7
97.1
95.7
A -Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 5/14/2013 Page I of 19
:analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact, This company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
/, ~,_ t, I v -r ._ /, I A ,"\(.>:;/ T U f'l ,. QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1304696 Dept: we
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate QCType: MSD
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-00JAMSD Date Analyzed: 04/29/2013 1644h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.77 mg/L E300.0 0.0114 1.00 5.000 0 95.4 90-110 4.7 1.52 20 -Lab Sample ID: I304696-002AMSD Date Analyzed: 04/29/2013 1754h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.76 mg/L E300.0 0.0114 1.00 5.000 0 95.1 90-110 4.73 0.485 20 -Lab Sample ID: 1304650-003DMSD Date Analyzed: 04/30/2013 2022h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.65 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100 1.000 0.618 103 90-110 1.59 3.48 10
Lab Sample ID: 1304696-0llBMSD Date Analyzed: 05/07/2013 2234h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.14 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100 1.000 0.172 96.7 90-110 1.13 0.935 10 1\
"-Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
ReportDate: 5/14/2013 Pagel9ofl9
: analyses applicable to the CWA. SDW A, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no rcsponsibi1ity
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1304696 Page 1 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 517/2013
Client ID: DEN100 Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate QCLevel: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (no chromatograms). MUST report project specific DL's: Cl@ 1 mg/L, N02/N03 @ 0.1 mg/L. EDD-Denison & LOCUS. Email Group~
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1304696-00lA TWN-07R _ 04232013 4/23/2013 0734h 4/26/2013 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1304696-0018 N02/N03-W-353.2 OJ df-no21no3
1 SEL AnaJytes: N03N02N
1304696-002A TWN-60_04252013 4/25/2013 0745h 4/26/2013 10l5h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1304696-0028 N02/N03-W -353.2 ~ df-no21no3
1 SEL Aualytes: N03N02N
I304696-003A TWN-07 _04242013 4/24/20I3 0922h 4/26/2013 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous VI df-cl
I SEL tlnnlyte.r: CL
1304696-0038 N02/N03-W-353.2 !Ji df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
I 304696-004A TWN-01_04232013 4/23/2013 0835h 4/26/2013 10 ISh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1304696-0048 N02/N03-W-353.2 VI df-no21no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1304696-00SA TWN-04_04232013 4123/2013 0922h 4/26/2013 l015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Anafytes: CL
1304696-00SB N02/N03-W-353.2 Vi df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1304696-006A TWN-18_04232013 4/23/2013 1004h 4/26/2013 lOISh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Ana(vtes: CL
1304696-006B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes; N03N02N
1304696-007 A TWN-03 _ 04242013 4/2412013 0935h 4/26/2013 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL A11alytes: CL
1304696-0078 N02/N03-W-353.2 0 df -no2/no3
1 SEL AIJalytes: N03N02N
1304696-008A TWN-02_04242013 4/24/2013 0945h 4/26/2013 1 015h 300.0-W Aqueous OJ df-cl
I SEL Analytes: CL
1304696-0088 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL (Juolyte.f: N03N02N
1304696-009A TWN-65_04232013 4/23/2013 1004h 4/26/2013 10 ISh 300.0-W Aqueous or df-cl
1 SEL Ana lyres; CL
Printed: 4/26120 l3 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M ff RT 0"' eNG" TAT cf QC r::r HO~ HOK __ HOK __ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1304696 Page2 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 5/7/2013
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1304696-0098 TWN-65_04232013 4123/2013 l 004h 4/26/2013 l015h N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Ana(vtes: N03N02N
1304696-0IOA Piez-01_04242013 4/24/2013 !OOOh 4/26/2013 l015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL A11alytes: CL
1304696-0 l 08 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1304696-0llA Piez-02_04242013 4/24/2013 1013h 4126/2013 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous h:il df-cl
1 SEL Ant4yrus; CL
1304696-0118 N02/N03-W-353.2 vr df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
l304696-012A Piez-03 _ 04242013 4/24/2013 l025h 4/26/2013 1015h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1304696-0128 N02/N03-W-353.2 IJI df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
Printed: 4/26/2013 FORLABORATORYUSEONLY[filloutonpage1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QCO HOK __ _ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed,__ ___ _
Client 'tner~ "fv.eh
Address G.L\~S ) ll\.>)...::3 lql
J:\lMd~Oll LIT &:lSi\
City '-..J State Zip
Phone 445 b71S -z.··z:t, · Fax. _____ _
--··---6--tMLl,(] POI'lrr!if
E-mail -~l!n<I"~];l~c\s co~
Project Name ztlit= N~+;t,
Project Number/P.O.# Date/Time
Sampler Nam~a·~ 'B2lli!l£\~ Collected
Sample ID
1-rw.Al-07R .0~ Z3ZOI'\ 14/23/1.3 ()73l\
L"!'wA>-~ __ o4'2.Sl0.15 L.\L251'13 oi'-15
1-rw.o-07_04 2t.f20l'3 ~/zti/IS OCfZ2
l"fwN-o\ oY zs2o13 · 14/z$/!S og3.5
I'TWN-oy_ 04 23Z D 13> IY/2.3/t~ 0'1'2.'2.
-rwJJ -18-0'i Z32D l3 Y/23/~:S 100'1
"Th)A)-03_ OY Z.'-f20 l'J. IY/Z"'/13 O<f~
ITw.N-OZ ... OY 2'120)3 1.-)lzY/ J::~ o'1 Y.5
t"'rW A.) ~ f.5_ 0 I.\ z:J>ZO l '3. 4/2.3/13 100'1
'f>T c z. 0 ,_ D-4 "2. "f"2.0 1"5 ~?..'i/'(!;, lOCO
Pie-z. -oz_~Z.4 -z.o1.3 '1/1!1/1:!::. \oJ~
Piez.-0::'.> 01f2.Y'ZCt!. 14/29/13, 1'6'25.
Relinquished By~~ lJ.)J J. A m-2.5/13 Received By: Sfgnalure
PRINT NAM!-t; .H,)Jlll ·vtY "'-l11l~r o ' t;o-
Time TOOl> PRINT NAME
Relinquished By: Signature <I Date Received By: Signature
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME
ReHllquiShed By: Signature Date Received By; Signature
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME
-~ ..... C'O :2
'll\)
w
1w
vJ
w
w
w
w
vJ
w
w
vJ
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
CHAIN OF
CUSTODY
[phone]
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Email:[e-mail]
TESTS REQUIRED
! ~ ~ q_
s ~ I~ c 0 ~ u
'5 ~ _§
<;; e 0 .c § ~ z ':<
'l. I~ y.
'-'{.. i.
"l '{ 1
·z. '{., i 'f..
l 1 '1-
2 "' '/..
'2. i I'£ ..
2. '(... '/. -
z X '/.. .
-z. "'{.. ~
rz. "' 'f.
z. 1 "f.
Date Special Instructions:
Time
oa.te
Time
Date
Time
RellnqUislled By: Sit]nawre Date Recelv~~ cl4~ ~a'?Luj; lf:t..ur;t
I D~INT NAMI= Time PRINT,..NAiijE _Lf.:_/"-' ?-Time/,.,./
Lab Sample Set#
Page __ l
IJo Y<O 7' (a
of 1
Turn Around Time (Circle One)
1 day 2day 3day 4day 5day~
QC LEVEL LABORATORY USE ONLY
1 2 2+
S~ERE:_ •
1 . ~~7'~ .Notes: -.,
(!)3+ 4 2 Ambiente Notes:
3 Temperature)' ' 0
COMMENTS 4 Received Broken/Leaking
~mproper1y Sealeb
Notes:
5. orly Preserved y N
ed at Bench y N
--fr)~'B~k Notes:
~~dv.fkc\.
(j4.}'l.'S( I~ 6 Received Within
~ingTimes N es:
.
COC Tape Was:
I 1 Present on Outer cvCkage
N NA
I 2 e 'orokeq on Outer . · ck~B· y N NA,
'
3 Present on Sample e y N .
4 Unbroken on Sample
y N t
Discrepancies Between
$amp!$ labels and COC
.Rei:ord? (!() y
Notes:
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &NO>
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TOX
TPO,,
TPH
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s SetE
1~"1-'' -Preservative All ""~"""'' .....
OK ·I :z... 3 '( J
oH <2 H2SO"
1>H<2 HiS04
PH >12 NaOH
pH <2 I-rN03
pH <2H.Jj0~ 1/~ t/.,.r ~~ ~'f ,;_.
pH <2 H2S04 r I ,r I I
pH <2 HCL
pH <2 1·1-zSO~
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pli <2~S04
pH <2}llP0,1
pH <2 H2SO.t
pH <2 H1so,
pH <2 HCL
I
---
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample fi·om Lid gen~ly over wide range pH paper
Oo Not dip the pH pap.er in the $8lnp1e bottle or lid
d nH -I z~· """"''
7
~ }'by
I
~-
I -
y '7 {rl
Ver !1-'J..c. r I
~ -1-... --
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
.6)
7)
lfsample is not preserved properly list' its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify clieol if requested
Plaoe client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
Sample Set: l}ot({g_y(p
ot ~ v 1=-J\""J." ~
II /1,.....---" "f/z,..61/;>
,/,.~ vts
I I
American West
ANAlYTICAl lABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1306139
American West Analytical Laboratories received 9 sample(s) on 6/7/2013 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You, Digitally signed by Jose G
G R.oclha
ON; co=<l<ml G. Rod'la,
• o=Amo•lcan West Anatytical Jose
Rocha
labonuol'i<ls. o.r-aunllly
Assurancc Olficer,
e(,llBji=Jo~o@awnl~abs.com,
c:-US
D:lJ4: 20 3.06.~814:24:51
Approvedby: ~-------------~~s~·oo~·--------~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 6/18/2013 Page I of29
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA i.lrc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocolfi. Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the anachcd COC This repon is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee .. rrivilcgcs of
subscqLJCnt use oft he name of this wmpany or any member of its stafl: or reproduction of this rcp011 in connection with the ndvcrtiscmcnt, promotion or sule of any product or process, 01 in connection with the re-publication of this report fol' any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab SetiD: 1306139
Date Received: 617/2013 1 OOOh
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1306139-001A TW4-25_06052013 6/5/2013 0752h Aqueous Anions, E300.0 ~alt Lake City, UT 84115 1306139-00lB TW4-25 06052013 6/5/2013 0752h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1306139-00lC TW4-25 06052013 6/5/2013 0752h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Phone: [phone] 1306139-002A TW4-24 06052013 6/5/2013 0812h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1306139-0028 TW4-24_06052013 6/5/2013 0812h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 Toll Free: [phone] 1306139-002C TW4-24_06052013 6/5/2013 0812h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
~-mail: [e-mail] 1306139-003A MW-26 06052013 6/5/2013 0855h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1306139-0038 MW-26 06052013 6/5/2013 0855h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1306139-003C MW-26_06052013 6/5/2013 0855h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1306139-004A TW4-04_06052013 6/5/2013 0925h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1306139-0048 TW4-04 06052013 6/5/2013 0925h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1306139-004C TW4-04 06052013 6/5/2013 0925h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1306139-005A MW-04 06052013 6/5/2013 0910h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1306139-0058 MW-04 06052013 6/5/2013 0910h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1306139-005C MW-04 06052013 6/5/2013 0910h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1306139-006A TW4-19 06052013 6/5/2013 1400h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1306139-0068 TW4-19~06052013 6/5/2013 1400h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1306139-006C TW4-19 06052013 6/5/2013 1400h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1306139-007A TW4-22_06052013 6/5/2013 0830h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1306139-0078 TW4-22 06052013 6/5/2013 0830h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1306139-007C TW4-22 06052013 6/5/2013 0830h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1306139-008A TW4-20 06052013 6/5/2013 0842h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1306139-0088 TW4-20_06052013 6/5/2013 0842h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1306139-008C TW4-20_06052013 6/5/2013 0842h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1306139-009A Trip Blank 6/5/2013 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 6/18/2013 Page 2 of29
All ann lyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA Dre pcrfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attoched COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this rcpmt in c:onncction with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this rcp01t f01 any
ANAlYTICAl lABORATOFrlfS
463 West 3600 South
'alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
1306139
6/7/2013
6/5/2013
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 6118/2013 Page 3 of 29
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are pcrfonncd in accord:mcc to NELAC protocols Penincnt sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Pri\·ilcgcs of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reprodur.:tion of this rep011 in r.:onnecrion with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in conncr.:tion with the re-publication of this tcport for any
463 West 3600 South
;a!t Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
1306139
6/7/2013
6/5/2013
Intact
None
SW-846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: Multiple target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 6/1 8/2013 Page 4 of29
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Penincnt sampling infonnarion is located on the attached COC This report is provil1ed for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any producl or process, or in connection wilh I he re·publicarion of this 1eport fo1 any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1306139
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Units
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Amount
Spiked
Garrin Palmer
we
LCS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R55412 Date Analyzed: 06/10/2013 1357h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.69 mg!L E300.0 0.0114 1.00 5.000 0 93.8
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R55537 Date Analyzed: 06/13/2013 1736h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.987 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100 1.000 0 98.7
Limits
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 6/18/2013 Page 22 of29
1 analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC~ This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contacL This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1306139
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Units
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Amount
Spiked
Garrin Palmer
we
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: MB-R55412 DateAnalyzed: 06/10/2013 l334h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 1.00 mg/L E300.0 0.0114 1.00
Lab Sample ID: MB-R55537 Date Analyzed: 06/13/2013 1734h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) <0.100 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt o/e RPD Limit Qual
ReportDate: 6/18/2013 Page23of29
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols1 Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc oft he addressee_. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advcrtiscmcnl, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1306139
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (801 ) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013 QC Type: MS
Analyte Result Units Metbod
Lab Sample ID: 1306068-00lBMS Date Analyzed: 06110/20\3 1640h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 24,000 mg!L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: 1306139-00lAMS Date Analyzed: 06/10/2013 2010h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 2,500 mg/L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: 1306139-003BMS Date Analyzed: 06/13/20\3 174lh
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 12.3 mg/L E353.2
Lab Sample ID: l306188-034AMS Date Analyzed: 06/13/2013 1756h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.10 mg/L E353.2
MDL
57.0
5.70
0.0252
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
5,000
500
1.00
0.100
Amount
Spiked
25,000
2,500
10.00
1.000
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
61.3 95.6
136 94.7
2.11 102
0 110
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 6118/2013 Page 24 of 29
analyses applicable to the CW A, SOW A, and RCRA arc pcrfonn~..'ti in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mlx~ of its stafi, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this rcpon for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail : [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES QC SUMMARY _REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1306139 Dept: we
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013 QC Type: MSD
----------
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPD Ref. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1306068-00lBMSD Date Analyzed: 06/10/2013 1703h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 23,700 mg!L E300.0 57.0 5,000 25,000 61.3 94.5 90-110 24000 1.17 20
Lab Sample ID: 1306139-00lAMSD Date Analyzed: 06/10/2013 2033h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 2,480 mg!L E300.0 5.70 500 2,500 136 93.8 90-110 2500 0.854 20
Lab Sample ID: 1306139-00JBMSD Date Analyzed: 06/13/2013 1743h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 11.9 mg!L E353.2 0.0252 1.00 10.00 2.11 97.7 90-110 12.3 3.49 10
Lab Sample ID: 130618~34AMSD Date Analyzed: 06/13/2013 1758h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.08 mg!L E353.2 0.00252 0.100 1.000 0 108 90-110 1.1 1.96 10
Report Date: 6/18/20 13 Page 25 of 29
analyses applicable to the CW A. SOW A. and RCRA arc performed in accordance 10 NELAC protocols. Pertinent samplJng information is located on Lhc allacbcd COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any produel or process, or in connection with the rc-publiealion of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be gran Led only on contact. This company accepls no responsibility
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1306139 Page 1 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 6/18/2013
Client ID: DENlOO Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). RL of 1 ppm for Chloride and VOC and 0.1 ppm for N02/N03. Expected levels provided by client-see
Jenn. J-flag what we can't meet. EDD-Denison. Email Group.; .De
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1306139-001A TW4-25_06052013 6/5/2013 07 52h 6/7/2013 IOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1306139-001B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana{yres: N03N02N
1306139-001C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1306139-002A TW4-24_06052013 6/5/2013 0812h 6/7/2013 lOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1306139-002B N02/N03-W-353.2 IJI df -no2/no3
I SEL Analym.s: N03N02N
1306139-002C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analyte.s: 4 I # of Surr: 4
1306139-003A ~-26_06052013 6/5/2013 0855h 617/2013 1 OOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
I SEL A!lalytus: CL
1306139-003B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df -no2/no3
I SEL Anolytes.' N03N02N
1306139-003C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; # of Analyte.s: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1306139-004A TW4-04_06052013 6/5/2013 0925h 6/7/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1306139-004B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1306139-004C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1306139-005A ~-04_06052013 6/5/2013 0910h 617/2013 1 OOOh 300.0-W Aqueous 0 df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1306139-005B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Ana/ytes: N03N02N
1306139-005C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
l306139-006A TW4-19_06052013 6/5/2013 1400h 6/7/2013 I OOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
--
Printed: 6/7/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M (!(' RT ~ CN l!J TAT GJI QC ~ HOK __ HOK __ HOK ___ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1306139 Page2 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 6/18/2013
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1306139-006B 1LYV4-19_06052013 6/5/2013 1400h 617/2013 1 OOOh N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous ~ df -no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1306139-006C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1306139-007 A 1LYV4-22_06052013 6/5/2013 0830h 6/7/2013 1 OOOh 300.0-W Aqueous Q1 df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
1306139-007B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analyt£s: N03N02N
1306139-007C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # of Surr: 4
1306139-00SA 1LYV4-20_06052013 6/5/2013 0842h 6/712013 1 OOOh 300.0-W Aqueous OJ df·WC
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1306139-00SB N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
I SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1306139-00SC 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analyt£s: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1306139-009A Trip Blank 6/5/2013 61712013 lOOOh 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-Tfi-Cp.slom; #if Anolyres: 4 I# of Surr: 4
Printed: 617/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK __ _ HOK __ HOK___ COC Emailed, ____ _
Client ~r~ f-.~
Address Ls Hw '9\
~ )AAtl\llll \tt_ KLiSJJ
City ~ State Zip
CHAIN OF
CUSTODY
[phone]
[phone]
Phone 435 b78' 7:Z21 Fax. _____ _
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
Fax [phone]
Email:[e-mail]
(ro..rr~'f\ ?~lrn_t"L --···--· TESTS REQUIRED
E-mail ,&?0>\Yl'l~~ enu~~h. C..orr)
~ .J; Project Name -z..n~ Qv.~e..r c.h l~::u:~C!rl 1..01.3
Project Number/P.O.# i ~ ~ Date!Time ~
Sampler Name....-JN'l~r ~oma~-... ~ 1 Collected + L. "" 0 (.) X '5 ~ 0 E ~ ~ .s:. 0 co E ± \) ':::> Sample ID :2 :::1 z <
"Tv.l '-\-25_ 0'-() s 201.3 e,}5/l3 075-:l.. w .s X X '/.
~w Y -2Y_ ObDS'Z.O 13 b/5/n o g 12 vJ 5 'f.. 'f. 'f..
Mw ~2.{,._o~cs '2..013 b/S/1~ 0 8'55 w s_ '1. "'f. y..
n->4-OY ObOS z.ol3 lb/5/1.3 O'fZ.5 w 5 S( X X
M\\1-oy_ob.o.S'Z.Ol3 b/;/n oq 16 w :s '( "f.. .'f.
-nNLt-lq_ 0605'"2..013 b!S/13 lYOO "" 5 X f.. X
·-rwy -22_Db052PI3 6/5/r'S o8'3D vJ .5 X "X X·
~4-"Z.O_ObC>52.0l:3 C:./5113 06'iZ. w 5 X X X
-r;·\~ Rl"'nk . 61::./D X
--I~ P ·1\10\n K VG/13
Relinqulsh~..l~r Signature JI._~L Date Recelved By: Signature ~ Special Instructions: ... ..11nox '/t:./rJ ./""'
PRINTNAM~ ltll'a _V Time PRINT NAME / Time
OJ111c.l" lo 1 0.4. \100
Relinquished By: Signature v Date R.ecelvecssy: Slg~ Date
PRINT NAME lime PRIN~ Time
Reliilquished By: Signature Date~ [Received By: Signature Date
PRINT NAME .~ l'fTme PRINT NAME Time
I I
Relinquished By: Slgnqtu~ Date RnBy: mre ~ ) ?~t, 1 ,..., lhl711~ lA ".. I I I ~ !. ,/J
PRINT NAME _/ Time >~~~ '::::R._ 'Tqttt I t>'e .. ;l ~~ P ~g;,........ . e _....,...
Lab Sample Set#
Page / of
\30o\33
\
Tum Around Time (Circle One)
1 day 2 day 3 day 4 day· 5 daye~
QC LEVEL LABORATORY USE ONLY
~dderaverec 1 2 2+ N-e (lJ 3+ 4 2 Ambient Chilled
Notes:
3 Temperature 2 • 2~
COMMENTS 4 Received Broken/Leaking
(Improperly Seal(!) y N'
Notes:
~rly Preserved y N
ed at Bench y N
Notes:
I .
I
6 Received Within
~ingTimes
N
s:
COC Tape Was:
1 Present on Outer
(:Jage N NA
2 Unbroken on Outer
K!reN NA
3 Present on Sample ~
Y N A
Y N A
4 Unbroken on Sa!flp~
~pancJes Between
sample Labels and 0 Record? y N
Notes:
A W AL -Analytical Scope of Work
White Mesa Mill Blanding Utah
Page 11 of 13
Contamiha'l1t
~~,1 Ino.rgaoics , " ""' "· -': ·~ "'-• ·· _;. _,...
Chloride ---------A4500-Cl 1 mg/L 28 days None ~
B or I ~
r::-~-----v--
Sulfate A45~r-rmg/L
~b or ~ E300.0
Carbon~03 A2320 B 1 mg/L
~bonate as HC03 A2320 B 1 mg!L
Carbon Tetrachloride SW8260B 1.0 flg/L
or
SW8260C
2~None
-------14 days None
14 days None
14 days HCI to pH<2
Chloroform SW8260B 1.0 Jlg/L
or
14 days HCl to pH<2 :::; 6°C
SW8260C
Dichloromethane
(Methylene Chloride)
SW8260B l.Of.!g/L
I
14 days HCl to pH<2 :::; 6°C
Chloromethane
or
SW8260C
SW8260B
or
SW8260C
1.o flWL
!
14 days
1,2,~chlorobenzene SW8270D <10 ug!L 7/40 days None <J>K!
1 ,2-Dich~enzene SW8270D <10 ug/L 7/40 days None A 6°C
1,3-Dichlorob~ne SW8270D <10 u!g!L 7/40 days None ,.....v < 6°C
1,4-Dichlorobenze~ SW8270D <10 ulg!L 7/40 days Nony < 6°C
1-Methylnaphthalene ""' SW8270D <10 Ug/L 7/40 days ffine < 6°C
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ~8270D <10 U:g!L 7/40 days / None < 6°C
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol SW~D <10 uWL 7/40 da~ None < 6°C
2,4-Dichlorophenol ' SW8270I)'-..~--..<10 ug/L 7/~ys None < 6°C
2,4-Dimethylphenol SW8270D ~g_/L Vf/40 days None < 6°C
2.4-Dinitrophenol SW8270D <20 u~ 7/40 days None < 6°C
2 4-Dinitrotoluene SW8270D <J.e"UWL · ~40 days None < 6°C
2_..6-Dinitrotoluene SW8270D_...,..v<10 uW'l 7/4~_s None < 6°C
2-Chloronaphthalene SW8~D <10 u~ 7/40 da~ None < 6°C
2-Chlorophenol .sW"8270D <10 ug/L 7/40 days ~None < 6°C
2-Methylnaphthalene / SW8270D <10 uWL 7/40 days ~e < 6°C
2-Methvlphenol / SW8270D <10 ug/L 7/40 days Non~ < 6°C
2-Nitrophenol / SW8270D <10 u'g!L 7/40 days None
3&4-Meth~enol SW8270D <10 ug/L 7/40 days None
3,3'-0k1ilorobenzidine SW8270D <10 u~/L 7/40 days None < 6"'&,
~initro-2-methylphenol SW8270D <10 ug/L 7/40 days None
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N01 &N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TOX
TPO,i
TPH
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s
Preservative All E '-'W"t' ~~jJ ~~.,, ·==p
OK -oo\ l--00'2 ~tt)'?) --®\ -ro5
pH <2 H:zSO~
pH <2 L-hSO"
PH >12 NaOH
oH <2 HN03.
oH <2 H.2so~ 1'\le..-S I '\f~~ 1 \Je....~ l \lt"~ \(~
pH <2 H2S0 4 1 v t I I
pl{<2HCL
pH <2 H2SOo~
pH> 9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH <2 H2S04
pH <2 HsPO<~
pH <2 H2S04
pH <2 H2S04.
pH <2 HCL
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
t::.xcepl cxcepr
-~ 1-001
~l& 1 tle~ , I
~Av~t'' L.AvCtJ
1-bd&
1'\JU~C:::,
,~
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
Sample Set: \ ~O<a 139
toJ<vCfJl ~v~. Cf>to\llB
I
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 20 13
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1306288
American West Analytical Laboratories received 9 sample(s) on 6/14/2013 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank. You, Digitally signed by Jose G
G Rocha
ON: cn=Jose G Rocha,
• o=American West Analytical
Laboratories, ou=Quality Jose
Rocha Assurance Officer,
email=jose@awal-labs com,
c=US
Date: 2013.06 2416:41:08 Approvedby:~--------~----o-s·-oo-·~~----~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 6/24/2013 Page I of 29
All amtlyscs applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocol~ Pertinent sampling infunnation is located on I he attached CO C. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of il<l start: or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANALYTICAL lABORATORIE 5 Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 20 13
Lab Set ID: 1306288
Date Received: 6/14/2013 1442h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1306288-00lA TW4-26_06132013 6/13/2013 702h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
)alt Lake City, UT 84115 1306288-0018 TW4-26_06132013 6/13/2013 702h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1306288-001C TW4-26 06132013 6/13/2013 702h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Phone: [phone] 1306288-002A TW4-06_06132013 6/13/2013 712h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1306288-0028 TW4-06 06132013 6/13/2013 712h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1306288-002C TW4-06 06132013 6/13/2013 712h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687 8260C/5030C
!-mail: [e-mail] 1306288-003A TW4-05 06132013 6/13/2013 730h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1306288-0038 TW4-05 06132013 6/13/2013 730h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1306288-003C TW4-05 06132013 6/13/2013 730h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1306288-004A TW4-18 06132013 6/13/2013 740h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1306288-0048 TW4-18_06132013 6/13/2013 740h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1306288-004C TW4-18 06132013 6/13/2013 740h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1306288-00SA TW4-10_06132013 6/13/2013 750h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1306288-00SB TW4-10_06132013 6/13/2013 750h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1306288-00SC TW4-10 06132013 6/13/2013 750h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1306288-006A TW4-60_06132013 6/13/2013 830h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1306288-0068 TW4-60 06132013 6/13/2013 830h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1306288-006C TW4-60_06132013 6/13/2013 830h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1306288-007 A TW4-70 06132013 6/13/2013 702h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1306288-0078 TW4-70_06132013 6/13/2013 702h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1306288-007C TW4-70_06132013 6/13/2013 702h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1306288-008A Trip Blank 6/13/2013 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1306288-009A TW4-06R-06122013 6/12/2013 745h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1306288-0098 TW4-06R-06122013 6/12/2013 745h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1306288-009C TW4-06R-06122013 6/12/2013 745h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 6/24/2013 Page 2 of29
All an~lyscs applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pc1tincnt sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this comp~ny or any member of its staft~ or reproduction of this rcpo11 in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re--publication of this report for any
ANA LYTICAl lAB O RATORIES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab SetiD:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
1306288
6114/2013
6/12 & 6/13/2013
Intact
See COC
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 6/24/20 13 Page 3 of 29
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA nrc pcrfonncd in accordanl'C to NELAC protocol:;; Pertinent sampling infonnalion is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the cxch1sivc usc of the addressee~ Privileges of
subsequent usc of the n:...mc of this company or any member of ilS staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the :.1dvcrtiscmcnt, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
:lalt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
1306288
6/14/2013
6112 & 6/13/2013
Intact
See COC
SW-846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: Multiple target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved, with the following exception: . The pH of sample
1306288-008A was > 2. Analysis was performed within 7 day holding time. The analysis
and preparation of all samples were performed within the method holding times following
the methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 6/24/20 13 Page 4 of 29
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA ure pcrfom1cd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or rcprodut:tion of this report in connection with the advertisement, p1omotion or sale of any producl or process, or in connection with the rc·publicalion of this report for any
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1306288
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPO_,R.T
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Units Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R55718 Date Analyzed: 06/17/20 13 1944h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.66 mg!L E300.0 0.0114 1.00 5.000 0 93.1
Lab Sample ID: LCS-R55667 Date Analyzed: 06/17/2013 1612h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.05 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100 1.000 0 105
Limits
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 6/24/2013 Page 22 of 29
, analyses applicable to the CWA, SOW A, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of itS Staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1306288
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
Analyte Result
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Units
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Amount
Spiked
Garrin Palmer
we
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount •;.REC
Lab Sample ID: MB-R55718 Date Analyzed: 06/17/20 13 1921 h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride < 1.00 mg/L E300.0 0.0114 1.00
Lab Sample ID: MB-R55667 Date Analyzed: 06/17/2013 1610h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) <0.100 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100
Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt o/e RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 6/24/2013 Page 23 of 29
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided forthc exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1306288
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MS ------------
Analyte Result Units Method
Lab Sample ID: 1306288-006AMS Date Analyzed: 06/18/20 13 04 7h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.96 mg!L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: 1306288-009AMS Date Analyzed: 06/18/2013 22lh
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 4.94 mg!L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: 1306288-002BMS Date Analyzed: 06/17/2013 !62th
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.14 mg(L E353.2
MDL
O.oii4
0.0114
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
1.00
1.00
0.100
Amount
Spiked
5.000
5.000
1.000
Spike Ref.
Amount
0.042
0.044
0.155
%REC
98.3
97.8
98.5
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 6/24/2013 Page 24 of29
I analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling inh>J'IIIlltlon j; lqc-Jtotl on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or prOCCS.o,, 6( tn ~~~~~tiM whh the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTI CAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1306288
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 20 13
Analyte Result Units Method
Lab Sample ID: 1306288-006AMSD Date Analyzed: 06/18/20 13 Ill h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.03 mg/L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: 1306288-009AMSD Date Analyzed: 06/18/2013 244h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5.06 mg!L E300.0
Lab Sample ID: 1306288-002BMSD Date Analyzed: 06/17/20 13 1624h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.17 mg!L E353.2
MDL
0.0114
0.0114
0.00252
Reporting
Limit
1.00
1.00
0.100
Dept: we
QCType: MSD
Amount
Spiked
5.000
5.000
1.000
Spike Ref.
Amount
0.042
0.044
0.155
%REC
99.7
100
102
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
4.96 1.36 20
4.94 2.44 20
1.14 2.98 10
Report Date: 6/24/2013 Page 25 of 29
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling inrQTm-utlr.)1\ ,., lt>eil~ on the attacht:d COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the naanc of this company or any
mhcr of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or procc)'S, (1f 1n ~n~rio.n wHh the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1306288 Page 1 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 6/25/2013
Client ID: DENlOO Contact: Garrin Pahner
Project: 2nd Quarter Chloroform 2013 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms). RL of 1 ppm for Chloride and VOC and 0.1 ppm for N02/N03. Expected levels provided by client -see
Jenn. J-flag what we can't meet. EDD-Denison. Email Group.; j)f:,
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1306288-001A 1LYV4-26_06132013 6113/2013 0702h 6/14/2013 1442h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL AnalJ>tes: CL
1306288-00lB N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Anolytes: N03N02N
1306288-00lC 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Cuslom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1306288-002A 1LVV4-06_06132013 6/13/2013 0712h 6/14/2013 1442h 300.0-W Aqueous 0 df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1306288-002B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1306288-002C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 11260-W-Cus.tom: #of Analytes: 4 I # of Surr: 4
1306288-003A 1LVV4-05_06132013 6/13/2013 073 Oh 6/14/2013 1442h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Ana/ytes: CL
1306288-003B N02/N03-W-353.2 0 df-no2/no3
I SEL Analyies: N03N02N
1306288-003C 8260-W 0 VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1306288-004A 1LYV4-18_06132013 6/13/2013 0740h 6/14/2013 1442h 300.0-W Aqueous kn df-wc
I SEL Aruz1ytes: CL
1306288-004B N02/N03-W-353.2 0 df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analyfes: N03N02N
1306288-004C 8260-W 0 VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1306288-00SA TW4-10_06132013 6/13/2013 0750h 6/14/2013 1442h 300.0-W Aqueous 0 df-wc
I SEL Anal ies: CL
1306288-00SB N02/N03-W-353.2 hll df-no2/no3
I SELAnalytes: N03N02N
1306288-00SC 8260-W 0 VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Customt # of Analytes: 4 I # of Surr: 4
1306288-006A TW4-60_06132013 6/13/2013 0830h 6/14/2013 1442h 300.0-W Aqueous 01 df-wc
I SEL Analytes: CL
Printed: 6117/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M • HOK __ _ HOK __ _ HOK__ COC Emalled-y: • · -1) r:
_,.. . o-..•L-~~-..,....o~
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1306288 Page 2 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 6/25/20 13
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1306288-006B 1rYV4-60_06132013 6/13/2013 0830h 6/14/2013 1442h N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1306288-006C 8260-W 21 VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # of Surr: 4
1306288-00?A 1rYV4-70_06132013 6113/2013 0702h 6/14/2013 1442h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ elf-we
I SEL.An.alyuw. CL
1306288-00?B N02/N03-W -353.2 0 elf-no2/no3
1 SEL Ar1a(ytes~ N03N02N
1306288-00?C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I # ofSurr: 4
1306288-008A Trip Blank 6/13/2013 6/14/2013 1442h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Su": 4
1306288-009A 1rYV 4-06R-06122013 6/12/2013 0745h 6/14/2013 1442h 300.0-W Aqueous 0 elf-we
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1306288-009B N02/N03-W-353.2 0 elf-no2/no3
I SEL Analyt~: N03N02N
1306288-009C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
Printed: 6/17/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK __ _ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed~----
Client Encr~ ·~e...\S
Address G:.'-1"2.2. S Hw:j \q I .
~)Mdlf\9. vrr tSL:\51{
City ._j State Zip
Phone l\'15 f.o 7& '22U Fax ____ ,...--
Contact GtVr;n P01.\tnct
E-mail ~ e r er1 cr
Project Name 2nJ.. 0.. \Af>rter
Project Number/P.O.# _________ _
Sampler Name -(Mn-U' lto)\tl"'t1
....,
Date/Time
Collected
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake Clty, Utah
84115
CHAIN OF
CUSTODY
[phone]
[phone]
Fax[phone]
Email:[e-mail]
TESTS REQUIRED
~ 4 19 . ~ ~ :-t:
~ z s "*' <V 8 ~ ~ ..,
-~ ~ ~ l. 0 -.8-\=.Eo
Lab Sample Set# J ~0 lo 2 'ti{
Page of _ __:...} __
Tum Around Time (Circle One)
1 day 2day 3day 4day 5da~
QC LEVEL
1 2 2+
® 3+ 4
LABORATORY USE ONLY
SAMPLESn~ 1 Shipped or nd de liler;
Notes: ·
2 Ambiento~
Notes: ·~
3 Temperature ?· {p '0
:::aE ~ . <1:1 E ,_ \:
Sample ID < "") COMMENTS 4 Received Broken/Leaking
. (Improperly Seal~
··p,,Jt;-2b_ b ~ 1·-:s ZD 13 . I bii:\IU>l~ o7 O:J. vv :, 2\ '{. f.. ~otes: ~
-.,-w'-\-Ob_6bl~'2013 b/Uiz.or~ 671;2.. I'll" 5 'f... "/:. 1
\1 5 ct2pe y Preserved
1 .,.--.N\{-05 DC:.l~20\""') '-/13/z.or?, o73D vJ~sl1l-1--"/... N
ecked at Bench
IWl\-\ 8'_0bl~20l.3 f.:./\3/2.01:) 07l.j0 .vJIS 'f... '{.. "{\ ~otes: N
~'-\-10_ Ot ),3-z.O):.) ~/2015 OI.Sil_vJ 5~~ '{. ).__
1-,w'-\-f,O_Df.\3 2D_1.3_' lb/13/~ol~-0830 (Wl5l } I 'i.l 1-.
~'1-70_0f.l~20J3 · lwrl"~\3 _i)7~>~1w 1~1')( I ~I 'f-. 6 Received Within
~ngTimes
-rr:l> __ 'RJc,.llk IEi13/zon I I I I I '/. N
s:
h"'~o B\~Ak · k/l'i/zoa
\'vJ4-~(o~-ob~22.0}~ ~ ___ j tR/t..?.fl ·o o-r'/5"!-v\llsl'lQI)( lx
1
-DS..<'.-114.lt\? llcocTapeWas: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , F::o"" g I
-~ Special Instructions:
.e~ct\'0..~\ \~.'. Q.'l5,.\y~~l"f.
lt-----------------------f 2 Unbroken on Outer Package ~
y N 6
11
3 ~resento~Sample 6D
.. ~;:;.~~~;;;.~_=:=:=:=:=:=:=:~~====~·------------------------~ 4 Unbro~nonSampl~ I Relinquished By: Signature I Date II Rece1ved By: Slgrretvre y N ~
PRINT NAME lime PRINT NAME Time
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME Time Discrepancies Between I II sample Labels and coc ,--~-··-1-r-By.-roW r ·""!~. f9
.aal>ol:r· ~<tt..W: Time PRINT NAME lime
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02&N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TOX
TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
--...... I"" .. --~-~-... _,._..,...,. __ ~---,_
Preservative All ~nt -~ """-'"!'' "-A'-"'~·
OK -l'Y'!\ -~7 1-&o~ -wt\ --etes
pH <2 H2S04
. pH <2 H2S0,1
PH >12 NaOH
pH <2 HN0.3
pH <2 H2so~ l\.fe.4 ~.e.-~ ; ,,,e-4 1\J-ts 1\J.fn~
oH <2 HaS04 ' --y I I I
p.H<2HCL
pH <21i.2S04
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
oR <2 H:J;04
pH <2 H3J104
pH <2 H2S04
1JH <2 HaSO<~>
pH<2 HCL
-1----
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over '.vide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
~-... "I'
~eQre~ cor
,,, e:.c, 1--l e.~ r '
-
·069
~.eh 7
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
'6)
7)-
If sample is not pfeserved properly list its e:-.'tension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC. notify client if requested
P.lace client conve~ation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
Sample Set: )3L>fc2~
""""~' '-" I'' ~-~ -;..-F :e ~/t<!} ~~ IP
--1-----
TabH
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data Evaluation
2x Volume Check
NC =Not Calculated
TWN-2 , TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are continuously pumping wells.
Piezometers 1, 2, and 3 were not pumped, only one set of parameters were taken.
TWN-3 and TWN-7 were pumped dry and sampled after recovery.
!r-:=_ "1, ~ --~
!I.. )g"n_~tc..:...~i_Gd
RPD > 10%. Per there iscd QAP Rc isi n 7.2. Allachmenl 2-3, when a well is purged to dryness, only pH, temperature and spccilic conductance parameters arc required 10 be wilhin 10% RPD. Redox potential and turbidity parameters are measured for information
purposes only and as such are not required to meet the 10% RPD criteria used for pH, specific conductance and temperature.
NM = Not Measured. The QAP does not require the measurement of redox potential or turbidity in wells that were purged to dryness.
H-2: Holding Time Evaluation
Hold Time Allowed Hold Hold Time
Location ID Parameter Name Sample Date Analysis Date (Days) Time (Days) Check
PIEZ-01 Chloride 4/24/2013 4/29/2013 5 28 OK
PIEZ-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 4/24/2013 4/30/2013 6 28 OK
PIEZ-02 Chloride 4/24/2013 4/29/2013 5 28 OK
PIEZ-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 4/24/2013 4/30/2013 6 28 OK
PIEZ-03 Chloride 4/24/2013 4/29/2013 5 28 OK
PIEZ-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 4/24/2013 4/30/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-01 Chloride 4/23/2013 4/29/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 4/23/2013 4/30/2013 7 28 OK
TWN-02 Chloride 4/24/2013 4/29/2013 5 28 OK
TWN-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 4/24/2013 4/30/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-03 Chloride 4/24/2013 4/29/2013 5 28 OK
TWN-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 4/24/2013 4/30/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-04 Chloride 4/23/2013 4/29/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-04 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 4/23/2013 4/30/2013 7 28 OK
TWN-07 Chloride 4/24/2013 4/29/2013 5 28 OK
TWN-07 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 4/24/2013 4/30/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-07R Chloride 4/23/2013 4/29/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-07R Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 4/23/2013 4/30/2013 7 28 OK
TWN-18 Chloride 4/23/2013 4/29/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-18 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 4/23/2013 4/30/2013 7 28 OK
TW4-22 Chloride 6/5/2013 6/10/2013 5 28 OK
TW4-22 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 6/5/2013 6/13/2013 8 28 OK
TW4-24 Chloride 6/5/2013 6/10/2013 5 28 OK
TW4-24 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 6/5/2013 6/13/2013 8 28 OK
TW4-25 Chloride 6/5/2013 6/10/2013 5 28 OK
TW4-25 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 6/5/2013 6/13/2013 8 28 OK
TWN-60 Chloride 4/25/2013 4/29/2013 4 28 OK
TWN-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 4/25/2013 4/30/2013 5 28 OK
TW4-60 Chloride 6/13/2013 6/18/2013 5 28 OK
TW4-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 6/13/2013 6/17/2013 4 28 OK
TWN-65 Chloride 4/23/2013 4/29/2013 6 28 OK
TWN-65 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 4/23/2013 4/30/2013 7 28 OK
H-3: Analytical Method Check
~ammeter Mdh_olJ Method U~JSy Loi,L
Nitrate E353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
A4500-Cl B or A4500-Cl E
Chloride orE300.0 E300.0
Both Nitrate and Chloride were analyzed with the correct analytical method.
-e-potung urut ec H4R L .. Ch k
Required
Lab Reporting Reporting RL
Location Analyte Limit Units Qualifier Limit Units Check
PIEZ-01 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
PIEZ-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
PIEZ-02 Chloride 1 mg/L I mg!L OK
PIEZ-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg& O.I mg/L OK
PIEZ-03 Chloride 5 mg/L I mg!L OK
PIEZ-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-OI Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-01 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) O.I mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-02 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg!L OK
TWN-02 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-03 Chloride 50 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-03 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 mg!L OK
TWN-04 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg!L OK
TWN-04 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 m_g/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-07 Chloride 1 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-07 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-07R Chloride 1 mg/L u 1 mg/L OK
TWN-07R Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg_IL u 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-18 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-18 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TW4-22 Chloride 100 mg/L I mg/L OK
TW4-22 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK
TW4-24 Chloride 100 mg/L I mg/L OK
TW4-24 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) IO mg/L O.I mg/L OK
TW4-25 Chloride 50 mg/L I mg/L OK
TW4-25 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1 mg_IL O.I mg/L OK
TWN-60 Chloride 1 mg/L u 1 mg/L OK
TWN-60 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L u O.I mg!L OK
TW4-60 Chloride I mg/L u 1 mg/L OK
TW4-60 Nitrate/Nitrite i_as N) 0.1 mg/L u 0.1 mg/L OK
TWN-65 Chloride 5 mg/L 1 mg/L OK
TWN-65 Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) I mg/L O.I mg/L OK
H-5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
_(lonstifuent ~Jl TWN-18 ~ TWN'-65 %_RPQ
Chloride 64.3 66.1 2.76
Nitrogen 2.32 2.46 5.86
H-6 QC Control Limits for Analysis and Blanks
All QC control limits for the 2nd quarter of 2013 were within acceptable limits.
H7R . T E I -~eces pt emp_eratur~ va uatiOn
S:ample Batch Wells:ln lJa(.ch '[~mpqature;
1304696 Piezometer 1, Piezometer 2, Piezometer 3, TWN-1, TWN-2, 2.0 "C TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, TWN-18, TWN-60, TWN-65
1306139 TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 2.2 oc
1302239 TW4-60 3.6 oc
H -8 Rinsate Evaluation
All Rinsate and DI Blank samples were non-detect for the 2nd quarter of 2013.
Tab I
Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
NS = not sampled; ND = not detected
....._ 10 kriged nitrate isocon and label
MW-4
.4.2
TW4-1
0 6.9
TWN-1
<>o.s
PIEZ-1
Q 8.9
TW4-28 ~15
kriged nitrate isocon and label
(extent uncertain)
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed March, 2013
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2013 NITRATE (mg/L)
(NITRATE + NITRITE as N)
APPROVED DATE
WHITE MESA SITE
REFERENCE
H:/718000/aug13/nitrate/Unt0613.srf
FIGUR! -1
NS = not sampled; ND = not detected
......_ 1 00 chloride isocon and label
MW-4 .44
TW4-1
0 39
TWN-1
<>17
PIEZ-1
~53
TW4-28
~45
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed March, 2013 (not sampled)
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells; TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2013 CHLORIDE (mg/L)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/aug13/chloride/Ucl0613.srt I-2
TabJ
Analyte Concentrations Over Time
TWN-1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 0.7 19
7/21/2009 0.4 17
9/21/2009 0.4 19
10/28/2009 0.5 18
3/17/2010 0.5 17
5/26/2010 0.6 20
9/27/2010 0.6 19
12/7/2010 0.6 14
1/26/2011 0.5 17
4/20/2011 0.5 19
7/26/2011 0.5 14
10/17/2011 0.5 10
1/9/2012 0.6 15
4/18/2012 0.6 17
7/24/2012 0.6 17
10/15/2012 0.432 17.5
2/18/2013 0.681 17.6
4/23/2013 0.84 17.4
TWN-2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 25.4 29
7/21/2009 25 25
9/21/2009 22.6 17
11/2/2009 20.8 55
3/24/2010 62.1 85
6/2/2010 69 97
9/29/2010 69 104
12/9/2010 48 93
2/1/2011 43 93
4/28/2011 40 85
7/28/2011 33 74
10/20/2011 33 76
1/12/2012 31 86
4/20/2012 48 103
7/31/2012 54 93
10/17/2012 22.1 79
2/19/2013 57.3 80.5
4/24/2013 57.7 82.1
TWN-3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 23.6 96
7/21/2009 25.3 96
9/21/2009 27.1 99
11/2/2009 29 106
3/25/2010 25.3 111
6/3/2010 26 118
7/15/2010 27 106
12/10/2010 24 117
2/1/2011 24 138
4/28/2011 26 128
7/29/2011 25 134
10/20/2011 25 129
1/12/2012 25 143
4/20/2012 24 152
7/31/2012 27 158
10/17/2012 12.1 149
2/19/2013 22.2 157
4/24/2013 27.2 158
TWN-4
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 1 13
7/21/2009 0.05 12
9/21/2009 0.4 13
10/28/2009 0.4 11
3/16/2010 0.9 22
5/27/2010 1.0 22
9/27/2010 0.9 19
12/8/2010 1 21
1/25/2011 0.9 21
4/20/2011 0.9 21
7/26/2011 1.1 35
10/18/2011 0.9 20
1/9/2012 0.9 20
4/18/2012 1.1 24
7/25/2012 1.4 25
10/15/2012 1.45 26.4
2/18/2013 1.51 25.3
4/23/2013 1.63 24.4
TWN-5
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 0.22 42
9/21/2009 0.5 45
11/10/2009 0.2 48
3/16/2010 0.3 43
5/26/2010 0.3 44
7/12/2010 0.3 43
12/7/2010 0.3 45
1/25/2011 0.4 47
4/20/2011 0.3 44
7/26/2011 0.3 44
10/17/2011 0.3 45
1/9/2012 0.2 45
4/18/2012 0.3 39
7/24/2012 0.3 48
10/15/2012 0.1 43.5 Nitrate ND
TWN-6
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 3.2 32
9/22/2009 1.6 13
11/3/2009 1.4 21
3/23/2010 1.5 19
6/1/2010 1.4 22
7/13/2010 1.4 73
12/8/2010 1.2 21
1/26/2011 1.1 18
4/20/2011 1.5 22
7/27/2011 1.1 17
10/18/2011 1.4 21
1/10/2012 1.2 20
4/18/2012 1.1 22
7/25/2012 1.4 22
10/15/2012 0.786 20.4
TWN-7
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 ND 11
9/21/2009 ND 7
11/10/2009 0.1 7
3/17/2010 0.8 6
5/28/2010 1.2 6
7/14/2010 1.6 7
12/10/2010 1 4
1/27/2011 1.3 6
4/21/2011 1.7 6
7/29/2011 0.7 5
10/19/2011 2.2 6
1/11/2012 2.3 5
4/20/2012 1.2 6
7/26/2012 0.9 6
10/16/2012 0.641 5.67
2/19/2013 0.591 5.68
4/24/2013 1.16 5.88
TWN-8
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
8/25/2009 0 11 Nitrate is ND
9/21/2009 0 12 Nitrate is ND
11/10/2009 0 12 Nitrate is ND
3/16/2010 0 11 Nitrate is ND
5/26/2010 0 11 Nitrate is ND
7/12/2010 0 11 Nitrate is ND
12/6/2010 0 9 Nitrate is ND
1/25/2011 0 13 Nitrate is ND
4/18/2011 0 10 Nitrate is ND
7/26/2011 0 18 Nitrate is ND
10/17/2011 0 10 Nitrate is ND
1/9/2012 0 11 Nitrate is ND
4/18/2012 0 15 Nitrate is ND
7/24/2012 0 11 Nitrate is ND
10/15/2012 0 11.1 Nitrate is ND
TWN-9
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 9.3 169
9/22/2009 8.9 201
11/10/2009 12 205
3/23/2010 7.6 183
6/1/2010 7.6 175
7/15/2010 10.7 210
12/9/2010 8 172
2/1/2011 9.5 217
4/28/2011 10 192
7/29/2011 11 208
10/20/2011 10.9 134
1/12/2012 12.2 202
4/20/2012 10.6 209
7/31/2012 12.3 215
10/15/2012 12.5 194
TWN-10
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 1.1 19
9/22/2009 1.6 35
11/10/2009 1.4 26
3/23/2010 1.5 54
6/4/2010 1 30
7/14/2010 0.2 21
12/8/2010 1.3 28
1/27/2011 0.3 40
4/21/2011 1.2 28
7/27/2011 0.1 28
10/18/2011 0.2 33
1/10/2012 0.8 44
4/19/2012 0.9 28
7/25/2012 0.6 33
10/16/2012 0.119 30.8
TWN-11
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/3/2009 1.3 74
3/17/2010 1.4 73
6/4/2010 1.3 72
9/27/2010 1.4 76
12/8/2010 1.4 72
1/27/2011 1.4 84
4/26/2011 1.4 76
7/27/2011 0.1 76
10/17/2011 1.6 76
1/10/2012 1.6 69
4/19/2012 1.6 71
7/25/2012 1.8 77
10/16/2012 1.84 76.4
TWN-12
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/3/2009 0.5 109
3/17/2010 0.7 113
5/26/2010 0.8 106
7/12/2010 0.7 112
12/7/2010 0.7 103
1/26/2011 4.2 87
4/26/2011 1 109
7/26/2011 0.6 102
10/17/2011 1.2 87
1/10/2012 0.9 104
4/18/2012 1.2 106
7/25/2012 1.4 102
10/16/2012 1.41 101
TWN-13
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
11/4/2009 0.5 83
3/17/2010 0 47 Nitrate ND
5/26/2010 0.1 49
9/27/2010 0.2 53
12/7/2010 0.4 57
1/25/2011 1.6 103
4/26/2011 0 49 Nitrate ND
7/26/2011 0.1 49
10/17/2011 0 48 Nitrate ND
1/9/2012 0 46 Nitrate ND
4/18/2012 0 53 Nitrate ND
7/24/2012 0.1 48
10/15/2012 0 47.3 Nitrate ND
TWN-14
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/4/2009 3.4 32
3/24/2010 2.9 24
6/2/2010 2.9 30
7/15/2010 3.5 26
12/10/2010 4.2 28
1/28/2011 3.7 24
4/27/2011 3.5 30
7/29/2011 3.5 25
10/19/2011 3.9 27
1/11/2012 3.5 26
4/20/2012 3.4 27
7/27/2012 3.7 27
10/17/2012 4.03 27.4
TWN-15
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/10/2009 1.1 78
3/18/2010 0.7 43
5/28/2010 1.0 39
7/13/2010 1.0 36
12/9/2010 1.2 38
1/27/2011 1.4 43
4/27/2011 1.6 49
7/28/2011 1.6 47
10/19/2011 1.3 38
1/11/2012 1.5 38
4/20/2012 1.6 46
7/26/2012 2.1 50
10/17/2012 1.8 47
TWN-16
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/4/2009 1 39
3/17/2010 1.2 35
5/27/2010 0.2 35
9/27/2010 2.6 35
12/9/2010 2 30
1/27/2011 4.6 34
4/27/2011 1.6 39
7/27/2011 2.4 31
10/18/2011 2.6 34
1/10/2012 2.8 33
4/19/2012 2 50
7/25/2012 2.4 33
10/16/2012 2.5 32.1
TWN-17
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/4/2009 6.7 152
3/24/2010 10.4 78
6/3/2010 11 87
7/15/2010 8.9 66
12/10/2010 8 65
2/1/2011 8.6 90
4/28/2011 9 81
7/29/2011 8.5 74
10/20/2011 8.1 71
1/12/2012 8.7 79
4/20/2012 9.1 80
7/27/2012 9.5 85
10/17/2012 9.65 84.8
TWN-18
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/2/2009 1.3 57
3/17/2010 1.6 42
6/1/2010 1.8 63
9/27/2010 1.8 64
12/9/2010 1.6 59
1/27/2011 1.4 61
4/26/2011 1.8 67
7/28/2011 1.8 65
10/18/2011 1.9 60
1/10/2012 1.9 64
4/19/2012 2.1 64
7/26/2012 2.3 67
10/16/2012 1.95 67.5
2/18/2013 2.27 68.7
4/23/2013 2.32 64.3
TWN-19
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/2/2009 7.4 125
3/23/2010 7.2 118
6/1/2010 6.2 113
9/29/2010 7.2 113
12/9/2010 7 107
2/1/2011 7 114
4/28/2011 6.9 120
7/28/2011 7.1 113
10/18/2011 6.5 108
1/10/2012 7 114
4/19/2012 6.8 117
7/26/2012 7.5 117
10/16/2012 7.7 118
Piezometer 1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 6.8 NA
7/14/2009 6.8 60
9/22/2009 7.3 78
10/27/2009 7.4 61
6/2/2010 7.2 52
7/19/2010 6.8 52
12/10/2010 6.5 60
1/31/2011 7 60
4/25/2011 6.8 58
7/25/2011 7 53
10/19/2011 6.6 '55
1/11/2012 7.1 78
4/20/2012 6.6 58
7/27/2012 7.2 56
10/17/2012 7.66 55
2/18/2013 8.11 56.7
4/24/2013 8.88 53.3
Piezometer 2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.5 NA
7/14/2009 0.5 7
9/22/2009 0.5 17
10/27/2009 0.6 7
6/2/2010 0.6 8
7/19/2010 0.6 8
12/10/2010 0.2 6
1/31/2011 0.3 9
4/25/2011 0.3 8
7/25/2011 0.1 9
10/19/2011 0.1 8
1/11/2012 0.1 9
4/20/2012 0.2 8
7/27/2012 0.2 9
10/17/2012 0.192 9.5
2/19/2013 0.218 9.67
4/24/2013 0.172 10.3
Piezometer 3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.7 NA
7/14/2009 0.8 12
9/22/2009 0.8 24
10/27/2009 1.2 19
3/24/2010 1.7 116
6/2/2010 1.6 36
7/19/2010 1.6 35
12/10/2010 1.8 25
1/31/2011 1.8 40
4/25/2011 1.7 35
7/25/2011 1.8 61
10/19/2011 1.7 12
1/11/2012 1.8 20
4/20/2012 1.7 53
7/27/2012 1.8 21
10/17/2012 2.75 20.1
2/19/2013 1.85 21
4/24/2013 1.83 21.2
Upper Wildlife Pond
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Note
9/22/2009 0 5 Nitrate ND
10/27/2009 0 3 Nitrate ND
6/2/2010 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
7/19/2010 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
12/10/2010 0 1 Nitrate ND
1/31/2011 0.1 1
4/25/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
7/25/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
10/19/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
1/11/2012 0 2 Nitrate ND
TW4-22
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
2/28/2007 20.9 347
6/27/2007 19.3 273
8/15/2007 19.3 259
10/10/2007 18.8 238
3/26/2008 39.1 519
6/25/2008 41.9 271
9/10/2008 38.7 524
10/15/2008 36.3 539
3/11/2009 20.7 177
6/24/2009 20.6 177
9/15/2009 40.3 391
12/29/2009 17.8 175
3/3/2010 36.6 427
6/15/2010 19 134
8/12/2010 18 127
8/24/2010 15 130
10/13/2010 16 134
2/23/2011 18 114
6/1/2011 17 138
8/17/2011 15 120
11/16/2011 19 174
1/19/2012 14 36
6/13/2012 12.8 35
9/12/2012 7 121
10/4/2012 14 130
2/11/2013 58 635
6/5/2013 50.2 586
TW4-24
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
6/27/2007 26.1 770
8/15/2007 29 791
10/10/2007 24.7 692
3/26/2008 24.4 740
6/25/2008 45.3 834
9/10/2008 38.4 1180
10/15/2008 44.6 1130
3/4/2009 30.5 1010
6/24/2009 30.4 759
9/15/2009 30.7 618
12/17/2009 28.3 1080
2/25/2010 33.1 896
6/9/2010 30 639
8/11/2010 32 556
8/24/2010 31 587
10/6/2010 31 522
2/17/2011 31 1100
5/26/2011 35 1110
8/17/2011 34 967
11/16/2011 35 608
1/18/2012 37 373
6/6/2012 37 355
8/30/2012 37 489
10/3/2012 38 405
2/11/2013 35.9 1260
6/5/2013 23.7 916
TW4-25
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
6/27/2007 17.1 395
8/15/2007 16.7 382
10/10/2007 17 356
3/26/2008 18.7 374
6/25/2008 22.1 344
9/10/2008 18.8 333
10/15/2008 21.3 366
3/4/2009 15.3 332
6/24/2009 15.3 328
9/15/2009 3.3 328
12/16/2009 14.2 371
2/23/2010 14.4 296
6/8/2010 16 306
8/10/2010 14 250
10/5/2010 15 312
2/16/2011 15 315
5/25/2011 16 321
8/16/2011 16 276
11/15/2011 16 294
1/18/2012 16 304
5/31/2012 16 287
9/11/2012 17 334
10/3/2012 17 338
2/11/2013 9.04 190
6/5/2013 5.24 136
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 12.4 6/22/2005 125
9/22/2005 12.8 9/22/2005 125
12/14/2005 13.6 12/14/2005 128
3/22/2006 13.8 3/22/2006 125
6/21/2006 14.5 6/21/2006 124
9/13/2006 14.1 9/13/2006 118
10/25/2006 14.6 10/25/2006 124
3/15/2007 14.4 3/15/2007 125
8/22/2007 14.6 8/22/2007 126
10/24/2007 14.9 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 14.8 3/19/2008 118
6/3/2008 18.7 6/3/2008 125
8/4/2008 17.3 8/4/2008 121
11/5/2008 15.6 11/5/2008 162
2/3/2009 15.3 2/3/2009 113
5/13/2009 15.1 5/13/2009 122
8/24/2009 20.9 8/24/2009 118
10/14/2009 15.0 10/14/2009 129
1/20/2010 15.4 1/20/2010 106
2/9/2010 16.1 2/9/2010 127
4/27/2010 15.8 4/27/2010 97
5/24/2010 17.0 9/14/2010 111
6/15/2010 15.3 11/9/2010 126
8/24/2010 16.0 2/1/2011 134
9/14/2010 15.0 4/11/2011 134
10/19/2010 15.0 5/10/2011 128
11/9/2010 15.0 6/20/2011 127
12/14/2010 16.0 7/5/2011 127
1/10/2011 15.0 8/3/2011 126
2/1/2011 16.0 9/7/2011 145
3/14/2011 17.0 10/4/2011 129
4/11/2011 16.0 11/8/2011 122
5/10/2011 16.0 12/12/2011 124
6/20/2011 17.0 1/24/2012 124
7/5/2011 17.0 2/14/2012 126
8/3/2011 14.0 3/14/2012 128
9/7/2011 16.0 4/10/2012 128
10/4/2011 16.0 5/2/2012 124
11/8/2011 16.0 6/18/2012 131
12/12/2011 16.0 7/10/2012 128
1/24/2012 17.0 8/7/2012 139
2/14/2012 17.0 9/19/2012 130
3/14/2012 18.0 10/23/2012 135
4/10/2012 17.0 11/13/2012 114
5/2/2012 16.0 12/26/2012 122
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/18/2012 15.0 1/23/2013 128
7/10/2012 17.0 2/26/2013 129
8/7/2012 18.0 3/20/2013 126
9/19/2012 16.0 4/17/2013 117
10/23/2012 16.2 5/15/2013 119
11/13/2012 18.5 6/25/2013 127
12/26/2012 17.2
1/23/2013 19.2
2/26/2013 21.4
3/20/2013 14.3
4/17/2013 16.8
5/15/2013 18.8
6/25/2013 16.1
Under the groundwater sampling progran, accelerated monitoring for nitrate began in MW-
30 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began. This difference accounts for
the different number of data points represented above.
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 24.2 6/22/2005 139
9/22/2005 22.4 9/22/2005 136
12/14/2005 23.8 12/14/2005 135
3/22/2006 24.1 3/22/2006 133
6/21/2006 25.3 6/21/2006 138
9/13/2006 24.6 9/13/2006 131
10/25/2006 25.1 10/25/2006 127
3/15/2007 23.2 3/15/2007 132
3/15/2007 22.0 3/15/2007 132
8/27/2007 23.3 8/27/2007 136
10/24/2007 24.6 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 25.0 3/19/2008 124
6/3/2008 29.3 6/3/2008 128
8/4/2008 28.7 8/4/2008 124
11/11/2008 29.9 11/11/2008 119
2/3/2009 23.4 2/3/2009 115
5/13/2009 22.4 5/13/2009 124
8/24/2009 15.4 8/24/2009 122
10/14/2009 22.6 10/14/2009 138
2/9/2010 21.7 2/9/2010 128
4/20/2010 22.5 4/20/2010 128
5/21/2010 23.0 9/13/2010 139
6/15/2010 21.1 11/9/2010 138
8/24/2010 22.0 2/1/2011 145
9/13/2010 21.0 4/1/2011 143
10/19/2010 20.0 5/10/2011 143
11/9/2010 20.0 6/20/2011 145
12/14/2010 20.0 7/5/2011 148
1/10/2011 19.0 8/2/2011 148
2/1/2011 21.0 9/6/2011 148
3/14/2011 22.0 10/3/2011 145
4/1/2011 21.0 11/8/2011 145
5/10/2011 20.0 12/12/2011 148
6/20/2011 22.0 1/24/2012 155
7/5/2011 22.0 2/13/2012 150
8/2/2011 20.0 3/13/2012 152
9/6/2011 21.0 4/9/2012 160
10/3/2011 21.0 5/2/2012 151
11/8/2011 21.0 6/18/2012 138
12/12/2011 21.0 7/9/2012 161
1/24/2012 21.0 8/6/2012 175
2/13/2012 21.0 9/18/2012 172
3/13/2012 22.0 10/22/2012 157
4/9/2012 21.0 11/6/2012 189
5/2/2012 20.0 12/18/2012 170
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/18/2012 21.6 1/22/2013 176
7/9/2012 21.0 2/19/2013 174
8/6/2012 21.0 3/19/2013 168
9/18/2012 21.0 4/16/2013 171
10/22/2012 18.0 5/13/2013 169
11/6/2012 23.6 6/24/2013 179
12/18/2012 22.2
1/22/2013 22.8
2/19/2013 19.3
3/19/2013 19.1
4/16/2013 18.8
5/13/2013 23.8
6/24/2013 20.0
Under the groundwater sampling progran, accelerated monitoring for nitrate
began in MW-31 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began.
This difference accounts for the different number of data points represented
above.
TW4-19
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
7/22/2002 42 .80 12/7/2005 81
9/12/2002 47.60 3/9/2006 86
3/28/2003 61.40 7/20/2006 123
6/23/2003 11.40 11/9/2006 134
7/15/2003 6.80 2/28/2007 133
8/15/2003 4.00 8/15/2007 129
9/12/2003 5.70 10/10/2007 132
9/25/2003 9.20 3/26/2008 131
10/29/2003 7.70 6/25/2008 128
11/9/2003 4.80 9/10/2008 113
8/16/2004 9.91 10/15/2008 124
9/17/2004 4.50 3/4/2009 127
3/16/2005 5.30 6/23/2009 132
6/7/2005 5.70 9/14/2009 43
8/31/2005 4.60 12/14/2009 124
12/1/2005 0.10 2/17/2010 144
3/9/2006 4.00 6/9/2010 132
6/14/2006 5.20 8/16/2010 142
7/20/2006 4.30 10/11/2010 146
11/9/2006 4.60 2/17/2011 135
2/28/2007 4.00 6/7/2011 148
8/15/2007 4.10 8/17/2011 148
10/10/2007 4.00 11/17/2011 148
3/26/2008 2.20 1/23/2012 138
6/25/2008 2.81 6/6/2012 149
9/10/2008 36.20 9/5/2012 149
10/15/2008 47.80 10/3/2012 150
3/4/2009 3.20 2/11/2013 164
6/23/2009 2.40 6/5/2013 148
9/14/2009 0.10
12/14/2009 26.70
2/17/2010 2.00
6/9/2010 4.40
8/16/2010 5.90
10/11/2010 2.70
2/17/2011 17.00
6/7/2011 12.00
8/17/2011 3.00
11/17/2011 5.00
1/23/2012 0.60
6/6/2012 2.40
9/5/2012 2.50
10/3/2012 4.10
2/11/2013 7.99
6/5/2013 2.95
The sampling program for TW4-19 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TW4-21
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
5/25/2005 14.6 12/7/2005 353
8/31/2005 10.1 3/9/2006 347
11/30/2005 9.6 7/20/2006 357
3/9/2006 8.5 11/8/2006 296
6/14/2006 10.2 2/28/2007 306
7/20/2006 8.9 6/27/2007 327
11/8/2006 8.7 8/15/2007 300
2/28/2007 8.7 10/10/2007 288
6/27/2007 8.6 3/26/2008 331
8/15/2007 8.6 6/25/2008 271
10/10/2007 8.3 9/10/2008 244
3/26/2008 14.3 10/15/2008 284
6/25/2008 8.8 3/11/2009 279
9/10/2008 7.6 6/24/2009 291
10/15/2008 8.0 9/15/2009 281
3/11/2009 8.3 12/22/2009 256
6/24/2009 8.1 2/25/2010 228
9/15/2009 9.2 6/10/2010 266
12/22/2009 8.4 8/12/2010 278
2/25/2010 8.4 10/13/2010 210
6/10/2010 12.0 2/22/2011 303
8/12/2010 14.0 6/1/2011 297
10/13/2010 7.0 8/17/2011 287
2/22/2011 9.0 11/16/2011 276
6/1/2011 13.0 1/19/2012 228
8/17/2011 14.0 6/13/2012 285
11/16/2011 13.0 9/13/2012 142
1/19/2012 15.0 10/4/2012 270
6/13/2012 11.0 2/13/2013 221
9/13/2012 13.0 6/18/2013 243
10/4/2012 14.0
2/13/2013 11.8
6/18/2013 13.8
The sampling program for TW4-21 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TabK
Concentration Trend Graphs
In
1: 0 -.::; ca ... -1:
Cl)
(J
1:
0 0
Cl) -ca ...
:!:::: z ,...
I z ~
0>
c:i
...... ~ ~ ~ C> ~
~
" ~·
/.
•
~.
~.
v·
~V v
co
c:i
<D c:i
l{)
c:i
8 ~-/\ON
-
.
~ ~-das
o ~-6nv
o ~-uer
.
so-oaa
so-unr
0 c:i
tn c 0 ; m ... -c Q) u c
0 0
Q)
"0 'i:
.2 .r::. 0 ,....
I z ~
~---------r--------~r----------r----------.----------r 8~-AON
8~-A'ell\l
. ~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:J
o ~ -6n'v'
o~-uer
-6o-1nr
so-oaa
~---------r----------~---------r--------~~--------~so-unr
I{)
N 0 N
I{) 0 I{) 0
U) c 0 "+::0 co "--c
Cl)
() c
0 (.)
Cl) -co "-.t:: z
C\1 I z
3: 1-
r-----~------~----~------~----~------~------~-----r 8~-AON
-~~-des
-~ ~-qa.:J
-o ~ -onv
o~-uer
~----~-----4------+------+------+-----~----~~----+so-unr
0 co 0 <D 0 l!)
0
'""" (1J6W)
0 Ct) 0 C\1 0 0 ,..-
VI c 0 ... C'O "--c C1) u c 0
0
C1)
"C ·a: 0
J:
0
C\1 I z
3: 1-
~------~--------~--------~--------~------~---------r 8~·AON
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:J
o~-Bnv
o ~-uer
-so-oao
~------~--------+--------+--------4-------~--------~so-unr
0 C\J
T"""
0 0
T"""
0 co 0 co
(1J6W)
0 C\J 0
en c 0
+=i cu ... -c Q)
(J c 0
(.)
Q) -cu ... • t::: z
('I)
I z 3: 1-
.-------~----~-------,------~------~------~------~8~-AON
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa::J
o ~-5nv
0~-uer
~-----4-------4-------+-------+------~------~------*Bo-unr
0 C') LO C\J 0 C\J 0 0
(1f6W)
f/) c 0 ".j:i
C'CI "--c
Cl)
(.) c 0 0
Cl) ,
'i:
0
.c 0
M I z
3: 1-
.-----.-----~----~----,-----~----~-----r----~----~8~-AON
~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa:J
. o~-6ny
0 o~-uer
-6o-1nr
so-oao
~----+-----+-----+-----4-----4-----~----~----~----~so-unr
0 co 0 <D ,... 0 C\1 0 0 0 co
(1t6w)
0 <D 0 "<!" 0 C\1 0
en
s::::: 0 :,;; as ... -s:::::
C1) u
s::::: 0
0
C1) -as ... • '!:::: z
~ I z 3: 1-
~----~----~----~----~------~----~----~----~----~8~-AON
~ ~-das
. ~ ~-qa.:J
o~-6nv
o~-uer
~----+-----4-----~-----+-----4------~----+-----4------+so-unr
tO
0
(1J6W)
<D
0
C\1
0
0
tn c 0 ; ca .... -c
C1) u c
0 CJ
C1)
~ 'i:
0
.t:
CJ
llll:t I z ~
~----~------~----~------~----~~----~------~----~8~-AON
8 ~-ABV'J
~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa.::J
o ~-onv
-0~-uer
-5o-1nr
~----~----~~----4------4------+------+------~-----+so-unr
lO ('I) lO C\1 0 C\1
(1f6W)
0 lO 0 ....
In 1:
0 :; ca ... -1: G) u 1: 0 0
G) -ca ... • t::: z
It)
I z ~
.-----'"'T"'""-----.-------r----.----'"'T"'""----,. 8 ~ -lieV\1
~ ~-das
-~ ~-qa.:J
-o~-onv
0~-uer
5o-1nr
~-------+--------+--------+--------,_ ______ _, ________ -r ao-~aa
1.()
c:i
C\J
c:i
0
c:i
In c: 0 :::;
~ ... -c: G)
CJ c: 0 0
G)
"'C 'i: ~ .c 0
It)
I z ~
.------r------.------r----,.-----r-------,-8 ~-ABV\1
~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa,:~
o ~-Bnv
o ~-uer
~-------+--------+--------4--------4-------~~-------+so-oaa
0 co 0 1.0 0 C\J 0 0 .,.....
.-------.-------.-------r-----.-----.....-------..-----.-8 ~ -AeV\1
~ ~-das
1/) c 0
'+' as .... -c
Q)
(J c ~ ~ -qa.:J 0 0
Q) -as .... .:t::: z
CD I o ~ -onv z 3: 1-
o ~-uer
~----~~-----4-------4-------+------~------~-------+SO-oao
C\J 10 0 ci
1/) c 0 i ... -c
Q)
(,) c 0 0
Q) ,
'i: _g
~ 0
<9 z ~
0 ro
~
J
l
' ~
~
~
' ~ ~
~
~ ~
~
0 co 0 1.0 0 "<t
(1/6W)
....
0 C')
' ~
J ~
0 C\J
8 ~-ABV'J
~~-des
~ ~-qa.:J
0 ~ -6ny
o ~-uer
5o-1nr
0 0
en
s:::: 0 ; ca .... -s::::
Cl)
CJ
s:::: 0
0
Cl) -ca .... -~ z
r--I z 3: 1-
.----------.----------r----------.----------.----------r 8~·AON
· G ~ -Jd'v'
~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa.:::l
o ~ -Bnv
0~-u-er
1------+-----+-----+------+------1-60·1nr
L!) C\1 C\i
L!)
c) 0
~------~--------~------~--------~------~~-------r 8~-AON
G ~ -Jd'v'
tn c 0 '+0 cu ... ~ ~-das -c
C1)
(,) c
0 0
C1)
'g
'i: ~ ~-qa.:J
0
.I: 0
...... I z ;: . o ~-Bnv 1-
o~-uer
1--------+--------+---------J..--------+--------+---------l-so-oaa
C\1 0 C\1 0 ,....
(1/6W)
tn c: 0 ·.;; m ... ... c:
Cl) u c: 0
0
Cl) e .t:: z
co I z ~
0)
0
...... (.)
Q) ...... Q)
0
c
0 z
(ij
Q) ,_ ro
(/) c 0 -~ ,_ -c
Q)
(.) c 0 (.)
Q) ...... ro ,_
."!: z
co I z ~ 1-
co
0
<D
0
lO 0
(1f6W)
C\1 0
,....
0
~~
~
~
~
~
~ ~-das
~
~
~ ~-qa.:J
~
~
o ~ -onv
~
•
o~-u-er
•
• •
-
so-oaa
0
.----......,..---.---,..------.---...-----.---..----.....---.---.-8 ~ -AeV\1
• ~~-des
In c
0 +=i ca I.. ... c Cl)
() c ~ ~ -qa.:J 0 0
Cl)
"C 'i: .2 .c 0
co o ~ -onv I z
3: 1-
o ~-uer
.------.----..,...-----r-----.-----.-----.-----.-8 ~-ABV\1
~ ~-das
Cl) c:: 0 ·~ as ..... -c::
C1)
CJ c:: ~ ~ -qa.:J 0 (.)
C1) -as ..... ·-= z
en I z o ~ -Bnv
3: 1-
o ~-uer
~---~~-----4-------4-------+------+------~-------+80·090
C\J 0 co C\J 0 ...... ......
(1J6W)
t/1 c
0 .. ca ... -c Cl)
(J c 0 0
Cl)
"C 'i:
.2 s:.
0
0) I z ~
.-------,-------,-------,-----....-------.-8 ~ ·ABV'J
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:l
o ~ -6nv
o~-uer
r----------r----------r----------r----------r----------+80·090
0 1.()
C\J
0 0 C\J
0 1.()
T"""
(1f6W)
0 0
T"""
0 1.() 0
~--~,----.-----.-----r----,-----~--~.----.-----.8~-Ae~
o~-uer
5o-1nr
~----~----~----+-----+-----+-----4-----4-----4------+so-oaa
co C\1 0
c) c)
(1/6W)
tn c 0 ·.;:; as '-... c Q)
(,) c 0 0
Q)
"0 'i:
.2 .c
0
0 ,....
I z ~
0 CD 0 l.{) 0 v 0
(")
(1f6W)
0
(\J
0 0
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:J
0 ~ -5n\f
o~-uer
eo-1nr
en c
0 -.:; ca ... -c (I)
(.) c 0 0
! ca ... ~ z
T""
T"" I z ;;:
1-
C\1
' 1\.
'~
.....
~-
~
~
~
~
~ ----..--
~
co
0
c.o c)
~ ~
C\1 c) 0
~ ~-das
o ~ -5nv
o ~ -uer
6o-1nr
0 c
0 ~ .... -c C1) u c
0 (.)
C1)
"C 'i: 0
.c (.) ,... ,...
I z ~
0 C1>
•
'\
I
•
"
v~
0 co
•
~
t
~
0 <.0 0 I[) 0 ('I) 0 C\1
'
-
0
8 ~ -liBV\1
~~-des
~ ~-qa.:J
o ~-onv
o ~-uer
5o-1nr
f/J c
0 ~ -c C1)
() c
0 0
C1)
E .'!:::: z
N
T"" I z ~
1.{) C\1
C\i
(1/BW)
~
••
<.
........
~
1
~~
1.{)
0
-
0
8 ~-AeVIJ
~ ~-das
o ~ -Bnv
o ~-uer
6o-1nr
f/)
s:::::
0 ; ca ... -s::::: C1) u
s:::::
0 0
C1)
'0 ·~ 0
.s:::
0
N ,....
I z
3: 1-
.-------.---------.-----.---------.-----..------.-8 ~-AeVIJ
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::t
-o ~ -5nv
o ~-uer
1-----1-----1-----+-----+----1-----+60-lnr
0 C\1 0 0 ,.....
0 co 0 <D
(1f6W)
0 C\1 0
tn c 0 ·;
:r.. -c G)
(.) c
0 0
G)
10 :r.. .:t::: z
C") ,....
I z ~
'
T""" co
c:i
(1J6W)
<D c:i
~
8 ~ -liBV\1
~
i
~
i
-~ ~-das
..........
-
~-
o ~ -5nv
v v~ o ~-uer
C\1 0 c:i
In c: 0 ·.:;
ftS
""" -c: Q) u c: 0 0
Q)
"C 'i:
.2 .c:
0
C") -I z
== ....
r-----,------.-----,.----~---"'T"""----. 8 ~-ABV\1
~ ~-das
. ~ ~ -qa:l
o ~ -Bnv
o ~-uer
1-------+-----1-----+-----+----+------+ 6o-1nr
0 (\f 0 0
T""
0 co 0 <0
(1t6w)
0 -.:t 0 (\f 0
tn c::: 0 ·~ .... -c:::
G)
(.)
c::: 0 0
G) e
·-= z
lll:t
~ I z ~
~
-<
[\
~
) ~
\ ~
'/
~"~•
J,l
10 N
C\i
(1t6w)
10 0
~ ~-das
-~ ~ -qa.:J
0~-Bnv
0~-uer
60-lnr
0
1/)
r::::: 0 :;::; ca .... -r:::::
C1)
(.)
r::::: 0 0
C1)
"C 'i:
..2
..r:::::
0
o:::t ,..
I z
3: 1-
...----....-----.------.----.....------.------.----....... 8 ~-AeV\1
-~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa.:J
o ~ -Bnv
0~-uer
1------1-----+---+----+----1----1----+60-lnr
0 (") LO C\J 0 C\J
(1t6w)
LO 0 LO 0 ,....
en c 0 +0 ~ ~-das "' ... -c
G)
() c
0 0
G) -"' ... ~ ~ ~-qa.::J z
Lt') ..... I z 3: ....
o~-onv
o~-uer
0
In c 0 '!
1: Cl) u c
0 0
G> "tJ 'i:
.2 .c 0
l.t) ,....
I z ~
0 Q)
I ~
0 00
~
~
(
i
\ ~
v
/ L.J
/
0 <0 0 0
IJ") "<t
(1/6W)
0 C') 0 C\J 0
.
-
0
8 ~-A'eV\1
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::l
o~-Bnv
o~-uer
.----....----,---..-----.----,-------,,.----.---...-------,--....,. 8 ~ -ABV\1
In c: 0 ; ~ ~-das t1S ... -c:
G) u c: 0 0
G) -t1S ... ~ ~ ~-qa.:J z
CD ,....
I z 3: 1-
0 ~ -onv
-o ~-uer
~--1---+---+--+---1--+------11----1---1----+ 60·1nr
1.() 1.() (\J 1.() 0
C\i 0
(1/BW)
1/) c:
0 :;::; ca ... -c: CD (.) c:
0 (.)
CD "C 'i: _g
.c: (.)
CD
T"' I z
3\: 1-
r-------~------~~------~------~--------~-------r 8~-Ae~
~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa.:J
o ~ -5nv
. o~-uer
l---------+--------+--------+--------+--------t--------1-5o-1nr
0 CD 0 lO 0 (t)
(1f6W)
0 C\1 0 ,.... 0
...-----.-------,-----.------,-----r----......,.. 8 ~ -ABV\1
f/)
s::::
0 ',i:i ~ ~-das ca "--s::::
C1)
(.)
s::::
0 0
C1) -ca "-.~ ~ ~-qa::t z
....... ,....
I z ~
. o ~ -5ny
0~-uer
1----+-----+------1-----+----+-----+60-lnr
C\J co C\J 0
(1/6W)
Cl) c 0 i ""' -c
G.)
(,) c 0 0
G.)
'tJ 'ii: ~ .c 0
....... ,...
I z ~
~
\
~
t
)
L '~
\ v
~ v v
~ v
0
"""
0 C\J .-
0 0 .-
'
0 CX)
(1J6W)
0 C\J
-
-
-
0
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:J
o~-Bnv
o ~-uer
~---T----~------r----;-----..... 8~-AoN
8 ~-ABV\1
-G~-JdV en c 0 ... as ... -c
(I)
(,) c 0 ~ ~-das
(.)
(I) -as ... • t::: z
co
T"' I z -~ ~-qa.:J
== 1-
-0~-onv
-o ~-uer
~~-----~C\1~-----LOI-_-----,....1-------L0~----1 60-Inr
0 0
w
r::::: 0 ;; ca ... ...
r::::: G)
0
r::::: 0 0
G)
"0 'i:
.2
..r:::::
0
co -I z ~
0 <X)
I~
~·
\
~I ~
........ ~ v
0 <D
/
0 1.{) 0 "<t
(1f6W)
0 C') 0 C\1 0 0 .....
8~-AON
~ ~-das
o ~ -onv
o~-uer
U) c 0 ~ -c Cl)
(,) c 0
(.)
i '-.t:: z
Q)
"'"' I z ~
~
1
~
r
~
co
't
~ ~-das
~
-
~
o ~ -Bnv
o~-uer
60-1nr
1.0 C\1 0
(1J6W)
w c:: 0 ;
C'a ... -c:: C1) u c:: 0
0
C1)
"C 'i:
0
.r. 0
0) ..... I z s: 1-
.-----,---..,--------r---r-----.----,-------,,----,---..-----,.. £ ~ -ABV\1
~ ~-das
• ~ ~-qa.:::l
o~-onv
o~-uer
1---+---+---+--+---+--+----!---1---1---+ so-1nr
<D C\J ...;t C\J .,....
C\J C\J .,....
0 C\J co <D C\J 0 .,.... .,.... .,.... .,.... .,....
co 0 .,....
<D 0
II) c 0 i ... -c
C1)
(J c 0 0
C1)
i ... .:!:::: z ,.... ... C1)
G)
E 0 N C1)
0:
~
0
T"'"
> ~ ~ ~
~
~~
f
~,
~
I ~
8 ~-AON
~~-des
. o ~-onv
.
6o-1nr
so-oaa
so-unr
<0 LO (\J T"'" 0
(1/6W)
VI c::::
0 -.::; ca .... -c:::: Cl)
()
c:::: 0 0
Cl) ,
'i: 0
.c 0 ,.... ....
Cl)
G)
E 0 N Cl) c:
0 0) 0 co
<
-=::::::
1
~
v u
~ I)
~
_..---4
~~
0 co 0 C\J 0 ....
.
-
0
£~-AON
~ ~-das
o~-onv
o~-uer
6o-1nr
so-oaa
"' r:::: 0 ·::; as '-... r:::: Cl)
CJ r:::: 0 0
Cl) ... as '-:t: z
N
'-~ E 0 N Cl) a:
~------~----~~----~------~------~-------r-------r 8~·AON
~ ~-das
~~-qa.:J
o ~-Bnv
· 0~-u-er
~------~----~-------4-------+-------+------~-------+so-unr
I!)
c:i N c:i 0 c:i
t/) c
0 ·~ -c C1)
(.) c
0 0
C1) ,
'i: 0
.c 0
N
:r... .! C1)
E
0 .~ c.
co C\1 ,.-
~
'
~
~
~
~
~
'
0 co
8~-AON
. 8 ~ -ABV\1
-
. ~ ~-das
~
o ~ -5ny
. o ~-uer
,.
..
so-oaa
co C\1 0
~------~--------~------~--------,-------~~------~8~-AON
-c~-JdV
rn c 0 :;:; ~~-des m L. -c
G)
0 c 0 0 ~ ~ -qa.:l
Cl) -m L. :!::::: z
('t)
L. o~-onv G)
'&)
E 0 N Cl)
i:i: . o~-uer
6o-1nr
so-oaa
~------~--------+--------+--------+--------4--------+so-unr
C\1 10 0 c)
(1/6W)
"' r:::::
0 ·.:: lU ... -r:::::
Cl) u
r:::::
0 0
Cl)
"C 't:
.2 .r::::: 0
(") ... Cl)
i E 0 N Cl) ;r
.-----~r------.------~-------.-------r-------r-------r 8~·AON
8 ~-A'eV\1
l~-Jdy
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa::l
o~-6ny
o~-uer
-eo-1nr
~-----4-------4-------+------~------~------~------+ao-oaa
0 '<t 0 C\1
T""
0 0 0 co 0 co 0 '<t 0 C\1 0
tn 1: 0
'+=i C'l:l I.. .... 1: C1)
(,)
1: 0 0
C1)
i I.. .:t:: z
"C 1: 0 0..
~
"C
i
I..
C1)
Q.
Q.
::J
~ ~
Cl)
0 0
~
-
~
~
'
-----~_......~ -----
""'" 0 0
C\J 0 0
~
.
0
~ ~-oaa
~ ~-das
~ ~ -unr
~ ~ -qa.:J
0~-AON
o ~ -onv
0 ~-ABV\1
o~-uer
60-PO
.-----,-------r----.....-------;-----..------r c ~-Jd'v'
~ ~-oao
~ ~-das
1/)
1: ~ ~-unr 0 :,;:::; ca ... -1: Cl)
(.)
1: ~ ~ -qa.::l 0 (.)
Cl)
"C "i:
0
.c (.) 0 ~-/\ON
"C 1: 0 c..
Cl) :!::::
:2 -o ~ -onv
~ ...
Cl) c. c. :::) • 0 ~ -ABV\1
o ~-uer
-60-PO
1------+-----1----+------t-----+------r so-1nr
I{) C\1 ,.... 0
..... N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7/1/2002
11/1/2002
3/1/2003
7/1/2003
11/1/2003
3/1/2004
7/1/2004
11/1/2004
3/1/2005 -
7/1/2005 -
11/1/2005
3/1/2006
7/1/2006
11/1/2006
3/1/2007
7/1/2007
11/1/2007
3/1/2008
7/1/2008
11/1/2008
3/1/2009
7/1/2009
11/1/2009
3/1/2010
7/1/2010
11/1/2010
3/1/2011
7/1/2011
11/1/2011
3/1/2012
7/1/2012
11/1/2012
3/1/2013
w .j::>. 0 0
0 0 0 0
VI 0 0 0
0'\ 0 0 0
-...J 0 0 0
~ ~ I ~
U)
z -· r+
""' Q)
r+ tD
n 0
::::s n tD ::::s r+
""' Q)
r+ -· 0
::::s
"'
0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006 -
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008 -
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011 -
9/1/2011 -
12/1/2011 -
3/1/2012 -
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
N 0 ~ 0 0"1 0 00 0
.....
0 0
..... N 0 ~ 0
.....
0"1 0
..... 00 0
~ ~ I
~ ~
n :::r -0
""" -· c.
t1)
n
0
j n
t1)
j ,...
Ql ,... -· 0
j
<n
0 0
5/1/2005
8/1/2005
11/1/2005
2/1/2006 -
5/1/2006
8/1/2006
11/1/2006
2/1/2007
5/1/2007
8/1/2007
11/1/2007
2/1/2008
5/1/2008
8/1/2008
11/1/2008
2/1/2009
5/1/2009
8/1/2009
11/1/2009
2/1/2010
5/1/2010
8/1/2010
11/1/2010
2/1/2011
5/1/2011
8/1/2011
11/1/2011 ~
2/1/2012
5/1/2012
8/1/2012
11/1/2012 J
2/1/2013
5/1/2013
N
0 ~ 0
O'l 00
0 0
I-" 0 0
I-" N 0
I-" ~
0
I-" O'l
0
-4 :E ~ I N ....
z -· r+ ... Ql r+ tD
n
0
::::s n
tD
::::s r+
Ql
r+ -· 0
::::s
"'
0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006 -
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
U'l 0
...... 0 0
...... U'l 0
IV 0 0
IV U'l 0
(..U
0 0
(..U
U'l 0
.j::o
0 0
-1 :E ~ I N ..,.a.
n =r -0 .., -· a.
tD
n 0
::::s n tD
::::s r+ ..,
Q)
r+ -· 0
::::s
"'
V) c
0 ·-.., ra .... .., c cu u c
0 u
cu ..,
ra .... .., ·-z
N N I ~
3: 1-
0 ,..... 0 \0 0 Ln
1/SW
0 !"(') 0 N 0 ......
!"(') ......
0 N 'Co N ......... N
N ...... 0 N (;:;-
~ N
...... ......
0 N ......... 00 N ......... N
0 ......
0 N ......... 00 N ......... N
O'l 0 0 N ......... 00 N ......... N
00 0 0 N (;:;-
~ N
,.....
0 0 ~ 0~
N
Cl) c
0 ·-...,
tO ... ...,
c
C1J u c
0 u
C1J
"'C ·-...
0
.c u
N
N I q-
~ 1-
0 0 "'
0 0 1.0
0 0 Ln
0 0 o::t
0 0 ("/')
0 0 N
0 0 .-t
("/') .-t 0 N ~ N -N
N .-t 0 N -C1l N -N
.-t .-t 0 N -00 N -N
0 .-t 0 N -00 N -N
C1l 0 0 N -00 N -N
00 0 0 N -C1l N -N
"' 0 0 N ~ 0~
N
0
6/27/2007
8/27/2007
10/27/2007
12/27/2007
2/27/2008
4/27/2008
6/27/2008
8/27/2008
10/27/2008
12/27/2008
2/27/2009
4/27/2009
6/27/2009
8/27/2009
10/27/2009
12/27/2009
2/27/2010
4/27/2010
6/27/2010
8/27/2010
10/27/2010
12/27/2010
2/27/2011
4/27/2011
6/27/2011
8/27/2011
10/27/2011
12/27/2011
2/27/2012
4/27/2012
6/27/2012
8/27/2012
10/27/2012
12/27/2012
2/27/2013
4/27/2013
lJ1
......
0 ...... lJ1 N 0
mg/L
N lJ1
w
0
w
lJ1 ~ ~ lJ1
lJ1 0
~ ~ I
N ~
z ;::;:
Ql
r+ t1)
n 0 :s n
t1) :s r+
Ql
r+ -· 0 :s
"'
"' c
0 ·-...,
(U .... ...,
c
Q) u c
0 u
Q)
"'C ·-....
0 -~ u
--=:t N
I --=:t ~
0 0 '<t ......
0 0 N ......
0 0 0 ......
0 0 00
1/8W
0 0
1.0
0 0 '<t
0 0 N
...... ......
0 N -I' N -1.0
0 ...... 0 N -I' N -1.0
O'l 0 0 N -I' N -1.0
00 0 0 N -I' N
U5'
I' 0 0 ~ 0~
1.0
......
0 1.11 0
6/27/2007
8/27/2007
10/27/2007
12/27/2007
2/27/2008
4/27/2008
6/27/2008
8/27/2008
10/27/2008
12/27/2008
2/27/2009
4/27/2009
6/27/2009
8/27/2009
10/27/2009
12/27/2009
2/27/2010
4/27/2010
6/27/2010
8/27/2010
10/27/2010
12/27/2010
2/27/2011
4/27/2011
6/27/2011
8/27/2011
10/27/2011
12/27/2011
2/27/2012
4/27/2012
6/27/2012
8/27/2012
10/27/2012
12/27/2012
2/27/2013
4/27/2013
mg/L
...... 1\.J 1\.J 1.11 0 1.11
~ .a:=. I N
U1
z -· r+
Q]
r+ tD
n 0
:::l n
tD
:::l r+
Q]
r+ -· 0 :::l
"'
6/27/2007
8/27/2007
10/27/2007
12/27/2007
2/27/2008
4/27/2008
6/27/2008
8/27/2008
10/27/2008
12/27/2008
2/27/2009
4/27/2009
6/27/2009
8/27/2009
10/27/2009
12/27/2009
2/27/2010
4/27/2010
6/27/2010
8/27/2010
10/27/2010
12/27/2010
2/27/2011
4/27/2011
6/27/2011
8/27/2011
10/27/2011
12/27/2011
2/27/2012
4/27/2012
6/27/2012
8/27/2012
10/27/2012
12/27/2012
2/27/2013
4/27/2013
U'l 0 0
1-' 0 0
1-' U'l 0
N 0 0
mg/L
N U'l 0
w 0 0
w
U'l 0 ~ 0
-!:> U'l 0
~ ~ I
N
U1
n
':r -0
"""' -· c.
tD
n 0 ::s n tD ::s r+
"""' Q)
r+ -· 0 ::s V\
0 0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007 ~
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008 '
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010 -
1 6/1/2010 ~·
9/1/2010
12/1/2010 ..
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011 .,
12/1/2011
3/1/2012 -
6/1/2012
9/1/2012 -
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
V1 0
...... 0 0
......
V1
0
N 0 0
N V1 0
s: :e I w 0
z ;:;
Dl .... tD
n 0 ::s n tD ::s ....
Dl .... -· 0 ::s
Vt
0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006 -
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009 ..
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012 .,
12/1/2012
3/1/2013 -
6/1/2013 -
N 0 .::. 0 0"1 0 00 0
....
0 0
.... N 0
.... .::. 0
.... 0"1 0
.... 00 0
s: :e I w 0 n :::r -0 ., -· c.
tD n 0
:l n tD
:l ,...
01 ,... -· 0
:l en
0 0
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008 .
6/1/2008
9/1/2008 .
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010 .
6/1/2010 .
9/1/2010
12/1/2010 .
3/1/2011
6/1/2011 -
9/1/2011 .
12/1/2011 .
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012 .
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
Y' 0
1-' 0 0
1-' Y' 0
N !=' 0
N ll1 0
w 0 0
w ll1
0
s
:E I w ....
z ;:::;:
Dl ,...
t1)
n
0
:::::s n tD
:::::s ,...
""' QJ ,... -· 0
:::::s
"'
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
0
12/1/2005
3/1/2006 -
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008 -
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009 -
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010 _,
3/1/2011
6/1/2011 -
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
6/1/2013
N 0 ~ 0 0"1 0 00 0
1-' 0 0
1-' N 0
1-' ~ 0
1-' 0"1 0
1-' 00 0
N 0 0
s
:E I w ......
n :::r -0 .., -· c.
tD
n 0
::::s n
tD
::::s r+
Ql r+ -· 0
::::s
""
TabL
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Monday, August 26, 2013 9:30 AM
Rusty Lundberg
'Phillip Goble'; 'Thomas Rushing'; 'Dean Henderson'; Harold Roberts; Dan Hillsten; David
Frydenlund; David Turk; JoAnn Tischler; Jaime Massey
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa MUI20i3 02 Nitrate Monitoring
1304696-EDD-rev1 .csv
Attached to this e-mail are electronic copies of laboratory results for nitrate monitoring conducted at the White Mesa
Mill during the second quarter of 2013, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
1