DRC-2013-002352 - 0901a06880386722

ENERGYFUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www energyfuels com
May 31,2013
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality ,
195 North 1950 West
P.O.Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
RK Transmittal of 1st Quarter 2013 Nitrate Monitoring Report
Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Imclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the 1st
Quarter of 2013 as required by the Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW 12-04, as well
as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
"DRC-2013-002352"
rv
cl['0n
Yours very truly,
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Jo Ann Tischler
Manager, Compliance and Licensing
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Dan Hillsten
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Katherine A. Weinel
Central Files
/e~.£-"" (~ ~ fJ
---LNERGYFUELS
May 31,2013
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 1st Quarter 2013 Nitrate Monitoring Report
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www .energyfuels.com
Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the 1st
Quarter of2013 as required by the Stipulation and Consent Order Docket Number UGW12-04, as well
as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truly,
~~
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
JoAnn Tischler
Manager, Compliance and Licensing
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Dan Hillsten
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Katherine A. Weinel
Central Files
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Nitrate Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Stipulated Consent Agreement, January 2009
Docket No. UGW09-03
1st Quarter
(January through March)
2013
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
May 31,2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING ................................................ 1
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ..................................... 1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring ...................................................................................... 2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed .................................................................................. 3
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring .................................................. 3
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures ....... 4
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater .................................. 4
2.3 Field Data ............................................................................................................ 5
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map .............................. 5
2.5 Laboratory Results .............................................................................................. 5
2.5 .1 Copy of Laboratory Results ........................................................................ 5
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................... 6
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION ................................... 6
3.1 Field QC Samples ............................................................................................... 6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ..................................................................... 7
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ........................................................................... 7
3.4 Data Validation ................................................................................................... 7
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation .................................................................... 7
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................ 8
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ................................................................. 9
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist ...................................................................... 9
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation ........................................................................ 9
3.4.6 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates ................................................. 9
3.4.7 Rinsate Check ............................................................................................. 9
3.4.8 Other Laboratory QA/QC ........................................................................... 9
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA ....................................................................... 10
4.1 Intyrpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions ........... 10
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map ................................................... 10
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Map
for Previous Quarter .................................................................................. 12
4.1.3 Hydrographs .............................................................................................. 13
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation ................. 13
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture ...................................... 13
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control ......................................................... 13
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps ............................... 14
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent ............................................................................ 14
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs .................... 14
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data .............................................................. 14
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
.......................................................................................................................... 16
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25
OPERATIONS REPORT .................................................................................. 17
5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 17
5.2 Pumping Well Data Collection ......................................................................... 17
1
5.3 Water Level Measurements .............................................................................. 18
5.4 Pumping Rates and Volumes ............................................................................ 18
5.4.1 MW-4 ........................................................................................................ 19
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ................................................................. 19
6.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions ..................................... 19
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ 19
8.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT .............................................. 21
9.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ........................................................... 22
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
Nitrate Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate mass Removed and Total Volume of Water
Pumped
Nitrate Data Over Time for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5, and MW-11
2
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly
Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H -4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control limits for Analysis and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H -8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
3
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Utah Department of Environmental Quality ("UDEQ") Division of Radiation Control
("DRC") noted in a Request dated September 30, 2008 (the "Request"), for a Voluntary Plan and
Schedule to Investigate and Remediate Nitrate Contamination at the White Mesa Uranium Mill
(the "Mill") (the "Plan"), that nitrate levels have exceeded the State water quality standard of 10
mg/L in certain monitoring wells. As a result of the Request, Energy Fuels Resources (USA)
Inc. ("EFRI") entered into a Stipulated Consent Agreement (the "Consent Agreement") with the
Utah Water Quality Board in January 2009 which directed the preparation of a Nitrate
Contamination Investigation Report ("CIR"). A subsequent letter dated December 1, 2009,
among other things, recommended that EFRI also address elevated chloride concentration in the
CIR. The Consent Agreement ("CA") was amended in August 2011. Under the amended
Consent Agreement, EFRI submitted a Corrective Action Plan ("CAP"), pursuant to the
requirements of the Utah Groundwater Quality Protection Rules [UAC R317-6-6.15(C-E)] on
November 29, 2011 and revised versions of the CAP on February 27, 2012 and May 7, 2012. On
December 12, 2012, DRC signed the Stipulation and Consent Order ("SCO"), Docket Number
UGW12-04, which approved the EFRI CAP, dated May 7, 2012. The SCO ordered EFRI to
fully implement all elements of the May 7, 2012 CAP.
Based on the schedule included in the CAP and as delineated and approved by the SCO, all
activities associated with the implementation of the CAP began in January, 2013. The reporting
requirements specified in the CAP and SCO are included in this quarterly nitrate report.
This is the Quarterly Nitrate Monitoring Report, as required under the SCO, State of UDEQ
Docket No. UGW12-04 for the 1st quarter of 2013. This report meets the requirements of SCO,
State of UDEQ Docket No. UGW12-04 and is the document which covers nitrate monitoring
activities during the 1st quarter of 2013.
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing wells,
temporary chloroform contaminant investigation wells and temporary nitrate investigation wells
is attached under Tab A. Nitrate samples and measurements taken during this reporting period
are discussed in the remainder of this section.
1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring
Quarterly sampling for nitrate monitoring parameters was performed in the following wells:
TWN-1
TWN-2
TWN-3
TWN-4
TWN-7
TWN-18
TW4-22*
TW4-24*
TW4-25*
Piezometer 1
Piezometer 2
Piezometer 3
As discussed in Section 2.1.2 the analytical constituents required by the CAP include are
inorganic chloride and nitrate+nitrite as N (referred to as nitrate in this document)
* TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 are chloroform investigation wells and are sampled as part of the
chloroform program. The analytical suite for these three wells includes nitrate, chloride and a
select list of Volatile Organic Compounds ("VOCs") as specified in the chloroform program.
These three wells are included here because they are being pumped as part of the remediation of
the nitrate contamination as required by the SCO and the CAP. The nitrate and chloride data are
included in this report as well as in the chloroform program quarterly report. The VOC data for
these three wells will be reported in the chloroform quarterly monitoring report only.
The December 12, 2012 SCO approved the CAP which specified the cessation of sampling in
TWN-5, TWN-6, TWN-8, TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-14, TWN-15,
TWN-16, TWN-17, and TWN-19. Per the CAP and SCO, these wells were not sampled during
the 1st quarter 2013. Additionally, the CAP and SCO approved the abandonment of TWN-5,
TWN-8, TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 within 1 year
of the SCO approval. These wells will be abandoned in accordance with the DRC-approved
Well Abandonment Procedure according to the schedule set by the CAP. TWN-6, TWN-14,
TWN-16, and TWN-19 will be maintained for depth to groundwater monitoring only as noted in
the CAP.
Table 1 provides an overview of all locations sampled during the current period, along with the
date samples were collected from each location, and the date(s) upon which analytical data were
received from the contract laboratory. Table 1 also identifies rinsate samples collected, as well
as sample numbers associated with any required duplicates.
As indicated in Table 1, nitrate monitoring was performed in all of the nitrate monitoring wells,
TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and Piezometers 1, 2, and 3. Analytical data for all of the above-
listed wells, and the piezometers, are included in Tab G.
Nitrate and chloride are also monitored in all of the Mill's groundwater monitoring wells and
chloroform investigation wells. Data from those wells for this quarter are incorporated in certain
maps and figures in this report but are discussed in their respective programmatic reports.
2
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed
Locations sampled during this reporting period were analyzed for the following constituents:
• Inorganic Chloride
• Nitrate plus Nitrite as Nitrogen (referred to herein as nitrate)
Use of analytical methods consistent with the requirements found in White Mesa Mill
Groundwater Quality Assurance Plan, ("QAP") Revision 7.2, dated June 6, 2012 was confirmed
for all analytes, as discussed later in this report.
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells and/or piezometers, pursuant to Part
I.E.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permit (the "GWDP") (dated August 24, 2012):
• The quarterly groundwater compliance monitoring wells.
• Existing well MW -4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation wells.
• Piezometers-P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-5.
• MW-20, MW-22, and MW-34.
• The DR piezometers which were installed during the Southwest Hydrogeologic
Investigation.
• Nitrate wells.
• In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in
conjunction with sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and accelerated
efforts, regardless of the sampling purpose.
All well levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5
calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under
Tab C.
Weekly and monthly depth to groundwater measurements were taken in the chloroform pumping
wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, and TW4-4, and the nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2. In addition, monthly water level measurements were taken in
non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and
TWN-18 as required by the CAP.
Depth to groundwater was measured in all of the nitrate wells this quarter. The CAP, which
became effective December 12, 2012, approved the abandonment of TWN-5, TWN-8, TWN-9,
TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17 and removed the requirement to
measure depth to groundwater in these wells. Since these wells were not abandoned during the
quarter, the depth to groundwater was measured. The depth to groundwater measurement data
for these wells are provided for information purposes only.
Weekly and monthly depth to groundwater measurements were also taken in the chloroform
pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-19, TW4-20, and TW4-4, and the nitrate pumping wells
TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2. In addition, monthly water level measurements were
3
taken in non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-3, TWN-4,
TWN-7, and TWN-18 as required by the CAP.
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures
The QAP provides a detailed presentation of procedures utilized for groundwater sampling
activities under the GWDP (August 24, 2012).
The sampling methodology, equipment and decontamination procedures that were performed for
the nitrate contaminant investigation, as summarized below, are consistent with the QAP.
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater
A list of the wells in order of increasing nitrate contamination is generated quarterly. The order
for purging is thus established. The list is included with the Field Data Worksheets under Tab B.
Mill personnel start purging with all of the non-detect wells and then move to the more
contaminated wells in order of nitrate contamination, starting with the wells having the lowest
nitrate contamination.
Before leaving the Mill office, the pump and hose are decontaminated using the cleaning agents
described in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP. Rinsate blanks are collected at a frequency of one
rinsate per 20 field samples.
Purging is completed to remove stagnant water from the casing and to assure that representative
samples of formation water are collected for analysis. There are three purging strategies
specified in the QAP that are used to remove stagnant water from the casing during groundwater
sampling at the Mill. The three strategies are as follows:
1. Purging three well casing volumes with a single measurement of field parameters
2. Purging two casing volumes with stable field parameters (within 10% RPD)
3. Purging a well to dryness and stability (within 10% RPD) of a limited list of field parameters
after recovery.
Mill personnel proceed to the first well which is the well with the lowest concentration (i.e. non-
dectect) of nitrate based on the previous quarter's sampling results. Well depth measurements
are taken and the one casing volume is calculated. The purging strategy that will be used for the
well is determined at this time based on the depth to water measurement and the previous
production of the well. The Grundfos pump (a 6 to 10 gallon per minute [gpm] pump) is then
lowered to the appropriate depth in the well and purging is started. At the first well, the purge
rate is measured for the purging event by using a calibrated 5 gallon bucket. After the
evacuation of the well has been completed, the well is sampled when possible, and the pump is
removed from the well and the process is repeated at each well location moving from the least
contaminated to most contaminated well. If sample collection is not possible due to the well
being purged dry, a sample is collected after recovery using a disposable bailer and as described
in Attachment 2-3 of the QAP. Sample collection follows the procedures described in
Attachment 2-4 of the QAP.
4
After the samples have been collected for a particular well, the samples are placed into a cooler
that contains ice. The well is then recapped and Mill personnel proceed to the next well. If a
bailer has been used it is disposed of.
Decontamination of non-dedicated equipment, using the reagents in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP,
is performed between each sample location, and at the beginning of each sampling day, in
addition to the pre-event decontamination described above.
Piezometers
Samples are collected from Piezometers 1, 2 and 3, if possible. Samples are collected from
piezometers using a disposable bailer after one set of field measurements have been collected.
Due to the difficulty in obtaining samples from the piezometers, the purging protocols set out in
the QAP are not followed.
After samples are collected, the bailer is disposed of and samples are placed into a cooler
containing ice for sample preservation and transit to the Mill's contract analytical laboratory,
American West Analytical Laboratories ("A W AL").
2.3 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all Field Data Worksheets that were completed during the
quarter for the nitrate contaminant investigation monitoring wells, and piezometers identified in
Section 2.1.1 above, and Table 1.
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map
Depth-to-groundwater measurements which were utilized for groundwater contours are included
on the Quarterly Depth to Water Sheet at Tab C of this Report along with the kriged groundwater
contour map for the current quarter generated from this data. All well levels used for
groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5 calendar days of each other
as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under Tab C. A copy of the kriged
groundwater contour map generated from the previous quarter's data is provided under Tab D.
2.5 Laboratory Results
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
All analytical results were provided by AWAL. Table 1 lists the dates when analytical results
were reported to the Quality Assurance ("QA") Manager for each well or other sample.
Results from analysis of samples collected for this quarter's nitrate investigation and a limited
list of chloroform investigation nitrate and chloride results are provided under Tab G of this
Report. Also included under Tab G are the results of analyses for duplicate samples and rinsate
samples for this sampling effort, as identified in Table 1. See the Groundwater Monitoring
Report and Chloroform Monitoring Report for this quarter for nitrate and chloroform analytical
results for the groundwater monitoring wells and chloroform investigation wells not listed in
Table 1.
5
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework
As discussed in Section 1.0 above, the Request, Plan, and Consent Agreement each triggered a
series of actions on EFRI' s part. Potential surficial sources of nitrate and chloride have been
described in the December 30, 2009 CIR and additional investigations into potential sources
were completed and discussed with DRC in 2011. Pursuant to the Consent Agreement, the CAP
was submitted to the Director of the Division of Radiation Control (the "Director") on May 7,
2012. The CAP describes activities associated with the nitrate in groundwater. The CAP was
approved by the Director on December 12, 2012. This quarterly report documents the monitoring
consistent with the program described in the CAP.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION
EFRI's QA Manager performed a QA/QC review to confirm compliance of the monitoring
program with requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA includes preparation
and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures, an analyte completeness
review, and QC review of laboratory data methods and data. Identification of field QC samples
collected and analyzed is provided in Section 3.1. Discussion of adherence to Mill sampling
Standard Operating Procedures ("SOPs") is provided in Section 3.2. Analytical completeness
review results are provided in Section 3.3. The steps and tests applied to check field data
QA/QC, holding times, receipt temperature and laboratory data QA/QC are discussed in Sections
3.4.1 through 3.4.7 below.
The analytical laboratory has provided summary reports of the analytical QA/QC measurements
necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Conference ("NELAC") certification and reporting protocol. The Analytical Laboratory QA/QC
Summary Reports, including copies of the Mill's Chain of Custody and Analytical Request
Record forms for each set of Analytical Results, follow the analytical results under Tab G.
Results of review of the laboratory QA/QC information are provided under Tab H and discussed
in Section 3.4, below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the analytical
laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field sampling program.
Field QC samples for the nitrate investigation program consist of one field duplicate sample for
each 20 samples, DI Field Blanks ("DIFB"), and equipment rinsate samples.
During the quarter, one duplicate sample was collected as indicated in Table 1. The duplicate
was sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same parameters as the nitrate
wells.
One rinsate blank sample was collected as indicated on Table 1. Rinsate samples are labeled
with the name of the subsequently purged well with a terminal letter "R" added (e.g. TWN-7R).
The field QC sample results are included with the routine analyses under Tab G.
6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the existing sampling SOPs, the QA Manager
observed that QA/QC requirements established in the QAP were being adhered to and that the
SOPs were implemented.
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for nitrate monitoring for the period were performed.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAP and GWDP (August 24, 2012) identify the data validation steps and data QC checks
required for the nitrate monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements, the QA
Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QA/QC evaluation, a holding time
evaluation, an analytical method check, a reporting limit evaluation, a QC evaluation of sample
duplicates, a QC evaluation of control limits for analysis and blanks, a receipt temperature
evaluation, and a rinsate evaluation. Because no VOCs are analyzed for the nitrate
contamination investigation, no trip blanks are required in the sampling program. Each
evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results of each
test are provided under Tab H.
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their adherence
with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of information: the
Field Data Sheets and the Quarter! y Depth to Water summary sheet. Review of the Field Data
Sheets addresses well purging volumes and stability of five parameters: conductance, pH,
temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Review of the Depth to Water data confirms that all
depth measurements used for development of groundwater contour maps were conducted within
a five-day period of each other. The results of this quarter's review are provided under Tab H.
Based upon the review of the field data sheets, all wells conformed to the QAP purging and field
measurement requirements. A summary of the purging techniques employed and field
measurements taken is described below:
Purging Two Casing Volumes with Stable Field Parameters (within 10% RPD)
Wells TWN-01, TWN-04, and TWN-18 were sampled after two casing volumes were removed.
Field parameters pH, specific conductivity, turbidity, water temperature, and redox potential
were measured during purging. All field parameters for this requirement were stable within 10%
RPD.
Purging a Well to Dryness and Stability of a Limited List of Field Parameters
Wells TWN -03 and TWN -07 were purged to dryness before two casing volumes were evacuated.
After well recovery, one set of measurements for the field parameters of pH, specific
conductivity, and water temperature only were taken, the samples were collected, and another set
7
of measurements for pH, specific conductivity, and water temperature were taken. Stabilization
of pH, conductivity and temperature are required within 10% RPD under the QAP. It is
important to note that redox potential and turbidity were measured as well during purging and
sampling. Two of the turbidity measurements were not within 10% RPD. Turbidity and redox
potential are not required to be measured or to be within 10% RPD per the QAP. Data from
measurement of these parameters has been provided for information purposes only.
Continuously Pumped Wells
Wells TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are continuously pumped wells. These wells are
pumped on a set schedule per the remediation plan and are considered sufficiently evacuated to
immediately collect a sample. As previously noted, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are
chloroform investigation wells and are sampled under the chloroform program. Data for nitrate
and chloride are provided here for completeness purposes.
During review of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel consistently
recorded depth to water to the nearest 0.01 foot.
All field parameters for all wells were within the QAP required limits, as indicated below.
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP requirements resulted in the
observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Attachment 2-3 specifically state that field
parameters must be stabilized to within 10% over at least 2 consecutive measurements for wells
purged to two casing volumes or to dryness. The QAP Attachment 2-3 states that turbidity
should be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a
higher turbidity. The QAP Attachment 2-3 does not require that turbidity measurements be less
than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such the noted observations regarding turbidity measurements
greater than 5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• Seven well measurements exceeded the QAP' s 5 NTU turbidity goal as noted in Tab H.
All required turbidity RPD' s met the QAP Requirement to stabilize within 10% except in
wells that were purged to dryness as noted above.
EFRI's letter to DRC of March 26, 2010 discusses further why turbidity does not appear to be an
appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to DRC's subsequent
correspondence dated June 1, 2010 and June 24, 2010, EFRI has completed a monitoring well
redevelopment program. The redevelopment report was submitted to DRC on September 30,
2011. DRC responded to the redevelopment report via letter on November 15, 2012. Per the
DRC letter dated November 15, 2012, the field data generated this quarter are compliant with the
turbidity requirements of the approved QAP.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample holding
time checks are provided in Tab H. All samples were received and analyzed within the required
holding time.
8
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement in
QAP Table 1 that samples be received at 6°C or lower. Sample temperatures checks are
provided in Tab H. All samples were received within the required temperature limit.
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by the laboratory were checked against the required methods
enumerated in the QAP. Analytical method checks are provided in Tab H. All methods were
consistent with the requirements of the QAP.
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits reported by the laboratory were checked against the
reporting limits enumerated in the QAP. Reporting Limit Checks are provided in Tab H. All
analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting limits, with the exception of
eleven samples and one duplicate sample that had increased reporting limits due to matrix
interference or required dilution due to the sample concentration. However, in all of those cases
the analytical results were greater than the reporting limit used.
3.4.6 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of duplicate
and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the duplicate and
original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured results (described as
activities in the QAP) are less than 5 times the required detection limit. This standard is based on
the EPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for all
duplicate pairs for all analytes regardless of whether or not the reported concentrations are
greater than 5 times the required detection limits. However, data will be considered
noncompliant only when the results are greater than 5 times the required detection limit and the
RPD is greater than 20%. The additional duplicate information is provided for information
purposes.
All duplicate results were within a 20% RPD. Results of the RPD test are provided in Tab H.
3.4. 7 Rinsate Check
Rinsate checks are provided in Tab H. A comparison of the rinsate blank sample concentration
levels to the QAP requirements -that rinsate sample concentrations be one order of magnitude
lower than that of the actual well -indicated that all of the rinsate blank analytes met this
criterion.
3.4.8 Other Laboratory QA/QC
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QA/QC Manager check the following items
in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct and complete, (2)
9
analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate Analytical Laboratory procedures
are followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5) QC samples are within
established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7) special sample preparation and
analytical requirements have been met, and (8) documentation is complete. In addition to other
laboratory checks described above, EFRI's QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items
(5) and (6)) to confirm that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for
spike duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative
sufficiently explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are
provided in Tab H.
All lab QA/QC results met these specified acceptance limits.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that a Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate ("MS/MSD") pair
be analyzed with each analytical batch. The QAP does not specify acceptance limits for the
MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFRI
samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are set by the laboratories. The review of the
information provided by the laboratories in the data packages verified that the QAP requirement
to analyze an MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not require
it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established acceptance limits.
The QAP does not require this level of review, and the results of this review are provided for
information only.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the MS/MSDs
recoveries and the associated RPDs for all quarterly nitrate samples are within acceptable
laboratory limits for all regulated compounds as indicated in Tab H.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the LCS
recoveries were acceptable which indicate that the analytical system was operating properly.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a reagent
blank. All analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a blank sample made and
carried through all analytical steps. For the Mill samples, a method blank is prepared for all
analytical methods. The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates
that the method blanks did not contain detections of any target analytes above the RL.
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions.
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the current quarter (shown as depth
to groundwater in feet) is included under Tab C. The data from this tab has been interpreted
(kriged) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under the same tab. The contour
map is based on the current quarter's data for all wells.
The water level contour maps indicate that perched water flow ranges from generally
southwesterly beneath the Mill site and tailings cells to generally southerly along the eastern and
10
western margins of White Mesa. Perched water mounding associated with the wildlife ponds
locally changes the flow patterns. For example, northeast of the Mill site, mounding associated
with wildlife ponds results in locally northerly flow near MW-19. The impact of the mounding
associated with the northern ponds, to which water is no longer delivered, is diminishing and is
expected to continue to diminish as the mound decays due to reduced recharge. Flow directions
are also locally influenced by operation of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4,
TW4-19, and TW4-20. Well-defined cones of depression are evident in the vicinity of all
chloroform pumping wells except TW4-4, which began pumping in the first quarter of 2010.
Flow directions are also locally influenced by the start-up of nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 during the first quarter of 2013. Nitrate pumping wells TW4-22,
TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 have not been in operation long enough for well-defined cones of
depression to have developed. Although operation of the nitrate pumping system has not yet
produced a well-defined impact on water levels, continued operation of the system is expected to
produce a well-defined capture zone that will merge with and enhance the capture associated
with the chloroform pumping system. The actual impact of nitrate pumping on the chloroform
pumping system cannot be evaluated until more data are collected as part of routine monitoring.
Although operation of chloroform pumping well TW 4-4 has depressed the water table in the
vicinity of TW4-4, a well-defined cone of depression is not evident. The lack of a well-defined
cone of depression likely results from 1) variable permeability conditions in the vicinity ofTW4-
4, and 2) persistent relatively low water levels at adjacent well TW 4-14.
Changes in water levels at wells immediately south of TW 4-4 resulting from TW 4-4 pumping
are expected to be muted because TW4-4 is located at a transition from relatively high to
relatively low permeability conditions south (downgradient) of TW4-4. The permeability of the
perched zone at TW4-6 and TW4-26 is approximately two orders of magnitude lower than at
TW 4-4. Any draw down of water levels at wells immediately south of TW 4-4 resulting from
TW4-4 pumping is also difficult to determine because of a general, long-term increase in water
levels in this area due to recharge from the wildlife ponds. Recharge from the southern wildlife
pond is expected to continue to have an effect on water levels near TW 4-4, but the effects related
to recharge from the northern ponds is expected to diminish over time as water is no longer
delivered to the northern ponds. Water levels at TW4-4 and TW4-6 increased by nearly 2.7 and
2.9 feet, respectively, between the fourth quarter of 2007 and the fourth quarter of 2009 Gust
prior to TW4-4 pumping) at rates of approximately 1.2 feet/year and 1.3 feet/year, respectively.
However, the increase in water level at TW 4-6 has been reduced since the start of pumping at
TW 4-4 (first quarter of 201 0) to less than 0.5 feet/year suggesting that TW 4-6 is within the
hydraulic influence of TW 4-4.
The lack of a well-defined cone of depression at TW4-4 is also influenced by the persistent,
relatively low water level at non-pumping well TW4-14, located east of TW4-4 and TW4-6. For
the current quarter, the water level at TW4-14 (approximately 5526.94 feet above mean sea level
[ft amsl]) is approximately 13 feet lower than the water level at TW4-6 (approximately 5539.53
ft amsl) and nearly 17 feet lower than at TW4-4 (approximately 5543.49 ft amsl) even though
TW 4-4 is pumping.
Well TW4-27 (installed south of TW4-14 in the fourth quarter of 2011) has a static water level
of approximately 5526.4 ft amsl, similar to TW 4-14.
11
Prior to the installation of TW4-27, the persistently low water level at TW4-14 was considered
anomalous because it appeared to be downgradient of all three wells TW 4-4, TW 4-6, and TW 4-
26, yet chloroform was not detected at TW4-14. Chloroform had apparently migrated from
TW4-4 to TW4-6 and from TW4-6 to TW4-26 which suggested that TW4-26 was actually
downgradient of TW 4-6, and TW 4-6 was actually downgradient of TW 4-4, regardless of the
flow direction implied by the low water level at TW4-14. The water level at TW4-26 (5539.1
feet amsl) is, however, lower than water levels at adjacent wells TW4-6 (5539.5 feet amsl), and
TW 4-23 (5543.5 feet amsl)
Hydraulic tests conducted in November, 2011 indicate that the permeability at TW4-27 is an
order of magnitude lower than at TW 4-6 and three orders of magnitude lower than at TW 4-4.
The similar water levels at TW4-14 and TW4-27, and the low permeability estimate at TW4-27
suggest that both wells are completed in materials having lower permeability than nearby wells.
The low permeability condition likely reduces the rate of long-term water level increase at TW4-
14 and TW4-27 compared to nearby wells, yielding water levels that appear anomalously low.
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater Contour Map
for Previous Quarter
The groundwater contour maps for the Mill site for the previous quarter, as submitted with the
Nitrate Monitoring Report for the previous quarter, are attached under Tab D.
A comparison of the water table contour maps for the current (first) quarter of 2013 to the water
table contour maps for the previous quarter (fourth quarter of 2012) indicates similar patterns of
drawdown related to operation of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19
and TW4-20. Although nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 were
brought into operation during the first quarter of 2013, water levels and water level contours for
the site have not changed significantly since the last quarter, except for a few locations. As
discussed in Section 4.1.1, pumping at TW4-4, which began in the first quarter of 2010, has
depressed the water table near TW4-4, but a well-defined cone of depression is not yet evident,
likely due to variable permeability conditions near TW4-4 and the persistently low water level at
adjacent well TW4-14.
Reported increases in water levels (decreases in drawdown) of approximately 8 feet, 4 feet, and 3
feet occurred in chloroform pumping wells MW-26, TW4-19, and MW-4, respectively, and
decreases in water levels (increases in drawdown) of approximately 7 feet, 6 feet, and 2 feet
occurred in nitrate pumping wells TWN-2, TW4-24, and TW4-22, respectively. Changes in
water levels at other pumping wells (chloroform pumping wells TW 4-4 and TW 4-20 and nitrate
pumping well TW4-25) were 1 foot or less. Water level fluctuations at pumping wells typically
occur in part because of fluctuations in pumping conditions just prior to and at the time the
measurements are taken.
A reported water level increase of approximately 3 feet occurred at TW4-7 (likely in response to
changes in pumping at adjacent well MW-4), and of nearly 6 feet occurred at TW4-12, restoring
it to a more typical value. Water level decreases of approximately 10 feet, 5 feet, and 3 feet for
Piezometer 2, TWN-4, and Piezometer 3, respectively, likely result from cessation of water
12
delivery to the northern wildlife ponds and the consequent continuing decay of the associated
perched water mound. The water level decrease of approximately 3 feet reported for TWN-3 is
likely related to operation of nitrate pumping well TWN-2, and the decrease of approximately 3
feet reported for TWN-1 is likely related to both decay of the perched water mound and
operation of nitrate pumping well TW 4-25.
The increases in water levels (decreases in drawdown) at chloroform pumping wells MW-26,
TW4-19, and MW-4 have slightly decreased the apparent capture of these wells relative to other
pumping wells. As a result, the combined capture of chloroform pumping wells MW -4, MW -26,
TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 has been reduced slightly since the last quarter.
4.1.3 Hydrographs
Attached under Tab E are hydrographs showing groundwater elevation in each nitrate
contaminant investigation monitor well over time.
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation
Attached in Tab F are tables showing depth to groundwater measured and groundwater elevation
over time for each of the wells listed in Section 2.1.1 above.
4.2 Effectiveness of Hydraulic Containment and Capture
4.2.1 Hydraulic Containment and Control
The CAP states that hydraulic containment and control will be evaluated in part based on water
level data and in part on concentrations in wells downgradient of pumping wells TW 4-22 and
TW4-24.
Water level data will be used to evaluate flow patterns resulting from operation of nitrate
pumping wells. Bounding stream tubes defining the capture zone of nitrate pumping wells will
be generated from the kriged quarterly perched water level data. Hydraulic containment and
control based on water level data will be considered successful if the entire nitrate plume
upgradient of TW4-22 and TW4-24 falls within the combined capture of the nitrate pumping
wells. The CAP requires that EFRI will evaluate the capture zones after four quarters of water
level measurements have been taken, and will include the capture zone boundaries on figures in
the next quarterly nitrate monitoring report. The current quarter is the first quarter of data
collected after the commencement of pumping the nitrate system. The capture zone maps will be
generated after four quarters of data are collected and will be included in the fourth quarter 2013
report which will be submitted on or before March 1, 2014.
The CAP states that MW -5, MW -11, MW -30, and MW -31 are located downgradient of TW 4-22
and TW4-24. MW-30 and MW-31 are within the plume near its downgradient edge and MW-5
and MW -11 are outside and downgradient of the plume. Hydraulic control based on
concentration data will be considered successful if the concentrations of nitrate in MW -30 and
MW -31 remain stable or decline, and concentrations of nitrate in downgradient wells MW -5 and
MW -11 do not exceed the 10 mg/L standard.
13
Table 5 presents the nitrate concentration data for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5 and MW-11 which
are down-gradient of pumping wells TW4-22 and TW4-24. Based on these data, the nitrate
plume is under control.
The plume has not migrated downgradient to MW -11 because nitrate was not detected at MW-
11. MW-5 was not sampled during the current quarter, but was non-detect in the previous
quarter. Between the previous and current quarters, nitrate concentrations increased slightly in
MW-30 and decreased slightly in MW-31. Nitrate in MW-30 increased from 18.5 mg/L to 21.4
mg/L and nitrate in MW-31 decreased from 23.6 mg/L to 19.3 mg/L. Changes in both wells were
less than 20% suggesting the changes are within the range typical for sampling and analytical
error. Although short-term fluctuations have occurred, nitrate concentrations in MW -30 and
MW -31 have been relatively stable, consistent with plume migration that is minimal or absent.
The relative stability of chloride in these wells also supports minimal plume movement.
4.2.2 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Included under Tab I of this Report are current nitrate and chloride iso-concentration maps for
the Mill site. Nitrate iso-contours start at 5 mg/L and chloride iso-contours start at 100 mg/L
because those values appear to separate the plumes from background. All nitrate and chloride
data used to develop these iso-concentration maps are from the current quarter's sampling
events.
4.2.3 Comparison of Areal Extent
Although changes in concentration have occurred in wells within the nitrate plume, the
boundaries of the plume have not changed significantly since the last quarter, even under the
influence of nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2. Nitrate pumping
has, however, caused the boundary of the northern portion of the chloroform plume to move
slightly to the west toward nitrate pumping well TW4-24. Nitrate concentrations at the
downgradient edge of the plume (MW-30 and MW-31) continue to be relatively stable,
suggesting that plume migration is minimal or absent.
4.2.4 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs
Attached under Tab J is a table summarizing values for nitrate and chloride for each well over
time. Some data (MW -18, MW -19 and the Frog Pond) were not sampled this period but the
historical data are included for information purposes.
Attached under Tab K are graphs showing nitrate and chloride concentration plots in each
monitor well over time.
4.2.5 Interpretation of Analytical Data
Comparing the nitrate analytical results to those of the previous quarter, as summarized in the
table included under Tab K, the following observations can be made for wells within and
immediately surrounding the nitrate plume:
14
a) Nitrate concentrations have increased by more than 20% in the following wells
compared to last quarter: TW4-19, TW4-22, TWN-1, TWN-2, and TWN-3;
b) Nitrate concentrations have decreased by more than 20% in the following wells
compared to last quarter: TW4-20 and TW4-25;
c) Nitrate concentrations have remained within 20% in the following wells compared to
last quarter: MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-18, TW4-21, TW4-24, TWN-4, TWN-7
and TWN-18; and
d) MW-11, MW-25, MW-32 and TW4-16 remained non-detect.
As indicated, nitrate concentrations at many of the wells with detected nitrate were within 20%
of the values reported for the wells during the previous quarter, suggesting that variations are
within the range typical for sampling and analytical error. Wells TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-22,
TW 4-25, TWN -1, TWN-2 and TWN -3 had changes in concentration greater than 20%. Of the
latter, TW4-19 and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells, and TW4-22, TW4-24 and TWN-2
are nitrate pumping wells. TWN-1 is located adjacent to nitrate pumping well TW4-25 and
TWN-3 is located adjacent to nitrate pumping well TWN-2. Fluctuations in concentrations at
pumping wells and wells adjacent to pumping wells likely result in part from changes in
pumping.
Nitrate pumping well TW 4-22 had the highest detected nitrate concentration. Since the last
quarter, the nitrate concentration in pumping well TW4-22 increased from 14 mg/L to 58 mg/L,
and the concentration in pumping well TWN-2 increased from 22 mg/L to 57 mg/L. Increases at
both wells likely result from the start-up of nitrate pumping in the current quarter. The
chloroform concentration in nitrate pumping well TW4-22 also increased substantially from 330
~giL to 10,600 ~giL in response to the start-up of pumping and the presence of historically high
chloroform concentrations at adjacent, cross-gradient well TW4-20. MW-27, located west of
TWN-2, and TWN-18, located north of TWN-3, bound the nitrate plume to the west and north.
In addition, the southernmost ( downgradient) boundary of the plume remains between MW-
30/MW-31 and MW-11. Nitrate concentrations at MW-5 (adjacent to MW-11) and MW-11 have
historically been low(< 1 mg/L) or non-detect for nitrate. MW-25, MW-26, MW-32, TW4-16,
TW 4-19 TWN -1, and TWN -4 bound the nitrate plume to the east.
Nitrate concentrations outside the nitrate plume exceed 10 mg/L at a few locations: TW4-12
(12.6 mg/L), TW4-26 (12.5 mg/L), and TW4-27 (31.2 mg/L). All are located southeast of the
nitrate plume and are separated from the plume by numerous wells having nitrate concentrations
that are either non-detect, or, if detected, are less than 10 mg/L. Concentrations at the above three
wells are within 20% of their concentrations during the previous quarter. New temporary perched
wells TW4-28 through TW4-31 were installed during the current quarter to better define nitrate
concentrations in these areas but will not be sampled until the next quarter (second quarter of
2013).
Chloride concentrations are measured because elevated chloride (greater than 100 mg/L) is
associated with the nitrate plume. Chloride concentrations at all measured locations are within
20% of their respective concentrations during the previous quarter except at the following
15
locations: TW4-21 (decreased from 270 mg/L to 221 mg/L); TW4-22 (increased from 130 mg/L
to 635 mg/L); TW4-24 (increased from 405 mg/L to 1,260 mg/L); and TW4-25 (decreased from
338 mg/L to 190 mg/L). TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are nitrate pumping wells, and TW4-21
is located between chloroform pumping well TW 4-20 and nitrate pumping well TW 4-25.
Changes in concentrations in these four wells are likely related to start-up of nitrate pumping
during the current quarter.
4.3 Estimation of Pumped Nitrate Mass and Residual Nitrate Mass within the Plume
Nitrate mass removed by pumping is summarized in Table 2, and includes mass removed by both
chloroform and nitrate pumping wells. Mass removal calculations begin with the third quarter of
2010 because the second quarter, 2010 data are specified to be used to establish a baseline mass
for the nitrate plume. As stated in the CAP, the baseline mass is to be calculated using the second
quarter, 2010 concentration and saturated thickness data "within the area of the kriged 10 mg/L
plume boundary." The second quarter, 2010 data set was considered appropriate because "the
second quarter, 2010 concentration peak at TWN-2 likely identifies a high concentration zone
that still exists but has migrated away from the immediate vicinity of TWN-2."
As shown in Table 2, a total of approximately 370 lb of nitrate has been removed from the
perched zone since the third quarter of 2010. Prior to the current quarter, all direct nitrate mass
removal resulted from operation of chloroform pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-
19, and TW4-20. During the current quarter:
• A total of approximately 128 lb of nitrate was removed by the chloroform pumping wells
and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2.
• Of the 128 lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 107 lb, (or 83%), was
removed by the nitrate pumping wells.
Baseline mass and current quarter mass estimates (nitrate + nitrite as N) for the nitrate plume are
approximately 43,700 lb and 41,350 lb, respectively. Mass estimates were calculated within the
plume boundaries as defined by the kriged 10 mg/L isocons by 1) gridding (kriging) the nitrate
concentration data on 50-foot centers; 2) calculating the volume of water in each grid cell based
on the saturated thickness and assuming a porosity of 0.18; 3) calculating the mass of
nitrate+nitrite as N in each cell based on the concentration and volume of water for each cell; and
4) totaling the mass of all grid cells within the 10 mg/L plume boundary. Data used in these
calculations included data from wells listed in Table 3 of the CAP.
The nitrate mass estimate for the current quarter is lower than the baseline estimate by 2,350 lb,
which is greater than the amount of nitrate mass removed directly by pumping. Changes in the
quarterly mass estimates are expected to result primarily from 1) nitrate mass removed directly
by pumping, 2) natural attenuation of nitrate, and 3) changes in nitrate concentrations in wells
within the plume as a result of re-distribution of nitrate within the plume and changes in
saturated thicknesses. Redistribution of nitrate within the plume and changes in saturated
thicknesses will be impacted by changes in pumping and in background conditions (such as the
decay of the perched water mound associated with the northern wildlife ponds). Examples of
concentration changes resulting from changes in pumping are the increases in nitrate
16
concentrations at nitrate pumping wells TW 4-22 and TWN-2 since the last quarter. Nitrate
increased from 14 to 58 mg!L in TW4-22 and from 22 to 57 mg/L in TWN-2.
Nitrate mass removal by 1) pumping and 2) natural attenuation will always act to lower nitrate
mass within the plume. Changes resulting from 3) redistribution of nitrate within the plume are
expected to result in both increases and decreases in concentrations at wells within the plume and
therefore increases and decreases in mass estimates based on those concentrations, thus
generating 'noise' in the mass estimates. Over the long term, however, nitrate mass estimates are
expected to trend downward.
As specified in the CAP, once eight quarters of data have been collected (starting with the
current quarter), a regression trend line will be applied to the quarterly mass estimates and
evaluated. The trend line will then be updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of
data are collected. The evaluation will determine whether the mass estimates are increasing,
decreasing, or stable.
5.0 LONG TERM PUMP TEST AT TWN-02, TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25
OPERATIONS REPORT
5.1 Introduction
Beginning in January 2013, EFRI began long term pumping of TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and
TWN -02 as required by the Nitrate CAP, dated May 7, 2012 and the SCO dated December 12,
2012.
In addition, as a part of the investigation of chloroform contamination at the Mill site, EFRI has
been conducting a Long Term Pump Test on MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20, and, since
January 31, 2010, TW4-4. The purpose of the test is to serve as an interim action that will
remove a significant amount of chloroform-contaminated water while gathering additional data
on hydraulic properties in the area of investigation.
Because wells MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, TW4-4 and TW4-20 are pumping wells that may
impact the removal of nitrate, they will be included in this report and any nitrate removal
realized as part of this pumping will be calculated and included in this and all future nitrate
quarterly reports.
The following information documents the operational activities during the quarter.
5.2 Pumping Well Data Collection
Data collected during the quarter included the following:
• Measurement of water levels at MW-4, TW4-19, MW-26, and TW4-20 and,
commencing regularly on March 1, 2010, TW4-4, on a weekly basis, and at
selected temporary wells and permanent monitoring wells on a monthly basis.
• Measurement of pumping history, including:
pumping rates
17
total pumped volume
operational and non-operational periods.
• Periodic sampling of pumped water for chloroform and nitrate/nitrite analysis and
other constituents
• Measurement of water levels weekly at TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02
commencing January 28, 2013, and on a monthly basis selected temporary wells
and permanent monitoring wells.
5.3 Water Level Measurements
Beginning August 16, 2003, the frequency of water level measurements from chloroform
pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, and TW4-19 was conducted weekly. From commencement of
pumping TW4-20, and regularly after March 1, 2010 for TW4-4, water levels in these two
chloroform pumping wells have been measured weekly. From commencement of pumping in
January 2013, water levels in wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-02 have been
measured weekly. Copies of the weekly Depth to Water monitoring sheets for MW-4, MW-26,
TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-4, TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25 and TWN-02 are included under Tab C.
Monthly depth to water monitoring is required for all of the chloroform contaminant
investigation wells and non-pumping wells MW-27, MW-30, MW-31, TW4-21, TWN-1, TWN-
3, TWN-4, TWN-7, and TWN-18. Copies of the monthly depth to Water monitoring sheets are
included under Tab C.
Depth to groundwater in all other nitrate contaminant investigation wells was monitored
quarterly. As previously stated, depth to groundwater was measured in all of the nitrate wells
this quarter. The CAP, which became effective December 12, 2012, approved the abandonment
of TWN-5, TWN-8, TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-11, TWN-12, TWN-13, TWN-15, and TWN-17
and removed the requirement to measure depth to groundwater in these wells. Since these wells
were not abandoned during the quarter, the depth to groundwater was measured. The depth to
groundwater measurement data are provided for information purposes only.
5.4 Pumping Rates and Volumes
The pumping wells do not pump continuously, but are on a delay device. The wells purge for a
set amount of time and then shut off to allow the well to recharge. Water from the pumping
wells is either transferred to the Cell 1 evaporation pond or is used in the Mill process. Unless
specifically noted below, no operational problems were observed with the well or pumping
equipment during the quarter.
All of the pumped wells are fitted with a flow meter which records the volume of water pumped
from the well in gallons. The flow meter readings shown in Tab C are used to calculate the
gallons of water pumped from the wells each quarter as required by Section 7 .2.2 of the CAP.
The average pumping rates and quarterly volumes for each of the pumping wells are shown in
Table 3. The cumulative volume of water pumped from each of the wells is shown in Table 4.
18
5.4.1 MW-4
During the weeki y check, on January 7, 2013, the flow meter at MW -4 was noted as cracked and
leaking. The pumping operations were not affected and the flow meter was replaced within 24
hours. No notifications to DRC were required.
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
There are no corrective actions resulting from 1st quarter 2013 nitrate sampling event.
6.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions
There were no corrective actions in the 4th quarter 2012 nitrate sampling event.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The water level contour maps for the first quarter, 2013 indicate that operation of the nitrate
pumping system has not yet produced a well-defined impact on water levels, and that hydraulic
capture associated with the chloroform pumping system has not changed significantly since the
previous quarter. As nitrate pumping continues, the hydraulic capture associated with the nitrate
pumping wells is expected to merge with the hydraulic capture associated with the chloroform
pumping, yielding enhanced capture for both nitrate and chloroform plumes. However, the actual
impact of nitrate pumping on the chloroform pumping system cannot be evaluated until more
data are collected as part of routine monitoring.
First quarter, 2013 nitrate concentrations at many of the wells within and adjacent to the nitrate
plume were within 20% of the values reported during the previous quarter, suggesting that
variations are within the range typical for sampling and analytical error. Changes in
concentration greater than 20% occurred in wells TW4-19, TW4-20, TW4-22, TW4-25, TWN-1,
TWN-2 and TWN-3; the concentrations in wells MW-11, MW-25, MW-32 and TW4-16
remained non-detect.
Of the wells showing changes in concentration greater than 20%, TW4-19 and TW4-20 are
chloroform pumping wells, and TW4-22, TW4-24 and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells. TWN-
1 is located adjacent to nitrate pumping well TW 4-25 and TWN-3 is located adjacent to nitrate
pumping well TWN-2. Fluctuations in concentrations at pumping wells and wells adjacent to
pumping wells likely result in part from changes in pumping.
The highest nitrate concentration (58 mg/L) was detected at nitrate pumping well TW4-22. Since
the last quarter, the nitrate concentration in TW4-22 increased from 14 mg/L to 58 mg/L, and the
concentration in pumping well TWN-2 increased from 22 mg/L to 57 mg/L. Increases in both
wells are presumed to result from the start-up of nitrate pumping in the current quarter. The
chloroform concentration in nitrate pumping well TW4-22 also increased substantially from 330
1-1g1L to 10,600 1-1g1L in response to the start-up of pumping and the presence of historically high
chloroform concentrations at adjacent, cross-gradient well TW4-20. MW-27, located west of
TWN-2, and TWN-18, located north of TWN-3, bound the nitrate plume to the west and north.
In addition, the southernmost ( downgradient) boundary of the plume remains between MW-
19
30/MW-31 and MW-11. Nitrate concentrations at MW-5 (adjacent to MW-11) and MW-11 have
historically been low(< 1 mg/L) or non-detect for nitrate. MW-25, MW-26, MW-32, TW4-16,
TW 4-19 TWN -1, and TWN -4 bound the nitrate plume to the east.
Although changes in concentration have occurred in wells within the nitrate plume, the
boundaries of the plume have not changed significantly since the last quarter, even under the
influence of nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2. Nitrate pumping
has, however, caused the boundary of the northern portion of the chloroform plume to move
slightly to the west toward nitrate pumping well TW4-24. Nitrate concentrations at the
downgradient edge of the plume (MW-30 and MW-31) continue to be relatively stable,
suggesting that plume migration is minimal or absent.
Nitrate plume (nitrate+nitrite as N) mass estimates for the first quarter, 2013 and for the second
quarter, 2010 were calculated. The second quarter, 2010 data were used to calculate the baseline
mass as specified in th CAP. The baseline mass estimate was approximately 43,700 lb and the
first quarter, 2013 mass estimate was approximately 41,350 lb. As specified in the CAP, once
eight quarters of data have been collected (starting with the current quarter), a regression trend
line will be applied to the quarter! y mass estimates and evaluated. The trend line will then be
updated quarterly and reevaluated as additional quarters of data are collected. The evaluation will
determine whether the mass estimates are increasing, decreasing, or stable.
During the current quarter, a total of approximately 128 lb of nitrate was removed by the
chloroform pumping wells and by nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-
2. Of the 128lb removed during the current quarter, approximately 107 lb, or 83%, was removed
by the nitrate pumping wells.
Nitrate concentrations outside the nitrate plume exceed 10 mg/L at a few locations: TW4-12
(12.6 mg/L), TW4-26 (12.5 mg/L), and TW4-27 (31.2 mg/L). All are located southeast of the
nitrate plume and are separated from the plume by numerous wells having nitrate concentrations
that are either non-detect, or, if detected, are less than 10 mg/L. Concentrations at the above three
wells are within 20% of their concentrations during the previous quarter. New temporary perched
wells TW 4-28 through TW 4-31 were installed during the current quarter to better define nitrate
concentrations in these areas but will not be sampled until the next quarter (second quarter of
2013).
Chloride concentrations at all measured locations are within 20% of their respective
concentrations during the previous quarter except at the following locations: TW4-21 (decreased
from 270 mg/L to 221 mg/L); TW4-22 (increased from 130 mg/L to 635 mg/L); TW4-24
(increased from 405 mg/L to 1,260 mg/L); and TW4-25 (decreased from 338 mg/L to 190
mg/L). TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 are nitrate pumping wells, and TW4-21 is located
between chloroform pumping well TW4-20 and nitrate pumping well TW4-25. Changes in
concentrations in these four wells are likely related to start-up of nitrate pumping during the
current quarter.
Nitrate mass removal from the perched zone has been increased substantially by start-up of
nitrate pumping wells TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2. Continued operation of these
wells is therefore recommended. Pumping these wells, regardless of any short term fluctuations
20
in concentrations detected at the wells, helps to reduce downgradient nitrate migration by
removing nitrate mass and reducing average hydraulic gradients, thereby allowing natural
attenuation to be more effective. Continued operation of the nitrate pumping system is expected
to reduce nitrate concentrations within the plume and to further reduce or halt downgradient
nitrate migration.
8.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFRI has provided to the Director an electronic copy of all laboratory results for groundwater
quality monitoring conducted under the nitrate contaminant investigation during the Quarter, in
Comma Separated Values ("CSV") format. A copy of the transmittal e-mail is included under
TabL.
21
9.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. on May 31, 2013.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
By:
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
22
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and compl te. am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
includin e p sibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Davi C. rydenlund
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
23
Tables
Table 1
Note: All wells were sampled for Nitrate and Chloride.
TWN-60 is a DI Field Blank.
TWN-65 is a duplicate of TWN-04.
TW4-60 is the chloroform program DI Field Blank.
Table 2 Nitrate Mass Removal Per Well Per Quarter
TW4-15
MW-4 (MW-26) TW4-19 TW4-20 TW4-4 TW4-22 TW4-24 TW4-25 TWN-02 Quarter Totals
Quarter (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.)
Q3 2010 3.2 0.3 5.8 1.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA 15.7
Q4 2010 3.8 0.4 17.3 1.4 5.1 NA NA NA NA 28.0
Q1 2011 2.9 0.2 64.5 1.4 4.3 NA NA NA NA 73.3
Q22011 3.5 0.1 15.9 2.7 4.7 NA NA NA NA 27.0
Q3 2011 3.5 0.5 3.5 3.9 5.4 NA NA NA NA 16.8
Q42011 3.8 0.8 6.2 2.5 6.4 NA NA NA NA 19.7
Q1 2012 3.6 0.4 0.7 5.0 6.0 NA NA NA NA 15.9
Q2 2012 3.7 0.6 3.4 2.1 5.2 NA NA NA NA 15.0
Q3 2012 3.8 0.5 3.6 2.0 4.7 NA NA NA NA 14.7
Q4 2012 3.2 0.4 5.4 1.8 4.2 NA NA NA NA 14.9
Q1 2013 2.5 0.4 14.1 1.4 3.6 8.1 43.4 7.5 47.5 128.4
Well Totals (pounds) 37.5 4.7 140.4 26.0 54.3 8.1 43.4 7.5 47.5 369.4
Table 3 Nitrate Well Pumping Rates and Volumes
Volume of Water Pumped
Pumping Well N arne during the quarter (gals) Average Pump Rate (gpm)
MW-4 62,943.7 4.3
MW-26 22,650.7 9.9
TW4-4 58,716.8 8.3
TW4-19 210,908.0 14.0
TW4-20 18,177.0 9.7
TW4-22 16,677.4 18.1
TW4-24 144,842.6 18.1
TW4-25 99,369.9 17.9
TWN-2 31,009.4 18.7
Totals Since Q3
2010 921744.45
Highlighted cells are the totals for the current
quarter
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
37.53 487604.9 4.7
Totals Since Q3
2010 2647641.3
Highlighted ce Highlighted cells are the totals for the
current quarter
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
140.4 484924.9 26.0
Totals Since Q3
2010 923756.7
Highlighted ce Highlighted cells are the totals for the
current quarter
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
54.29870 16677.4 8.1
Totals Since Q3
2010 144842.6
Highlighted ce Highlighted cells are the totals for the
current quarter
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
43.4 99369.9 7.5
Totals Since Q3
2010 99369.9
Highlighted ce Highlighted cells are the totals
for the current quarter
Table 4 Quarterly Calculation of Nitrate Removed and Total Volume of Water Pumped
47.5 369.391
Table 5 Nitrate Data Over Time for MW-30, MW-31, MW-5, and MW-11
:.·,J%fJqit~~!l~I ;~2:~m~~t)', ~~iQ~i:~o,1·o}jl };~#~~2ot.o~1 .·~,!~~·i:;~'o1J.:; ::~!~2~:2ot~2:;" ''Qs·:;go1:4': .'.~4;'Q:o~;~h ~~t;:2o.I:3;·.
·······•· ..,.~ ······~· ··' 15.8 15 16 16 17 16 16 17 16 17 18.5 21.4
..,,., ,,..,:"ii( 22.5 21 20 21 22 21 21 21 20 21 23.6 19.3
ND
ND
ND = Not detected
NS = Not Sampled
NS
ND
0.2
ND
NS 0.2 NS
ND ND ND
0.2 NS 0.1 NS ND NS
ND ND ND ND ND ND
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Weekly, Monthly and Quarterly
Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydro graphs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H -4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QAJQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H -6 QC Control limits for Analysis and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H -8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
3
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
{'
.... 'ff
TW4-19
E9
MW-5 • TW4-12
perched chloroform or
nitrate pumping well
perched monitoring well
0 temporary perched monitoring well
TWN-10
~ temporary perched nitrate monitoring well
PIEZ-1
~ perched piezometer
TW4-28
~ temporary perched monitoring well
installed March, 2013
RUIN SPRING o seep or spring
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
SITE PLAN SHOWING PERCHED WELL
AND PIEZOMETER LOCATIONS
WHITE MESA SITE
REFERENCE
H :/718000/may 13/Uwelloc 13.srf
FIGURE
A-1
TabB
Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Name
TWN-1
TWN-7
TWN-4
TWN-18
TWN-3
TWN-2
Piez 1
Piez 2
Piez 3
Nitrate
Mg/L
Previous
Qrt.
0.432
0.641
1.45
1.95
12.1
22.1
r-t
7.66
0.192
2.'75
Nitrate Samples
Date/Purge sample
?...ilK/ l3
'2./i'l!l:.>
z..;1g1 13
.,.,,,, 1(3
2--/11/l~
z./1'1 115
il..'-11
)6z_r:;
i'~Si
)"\-i ()
iCY5
it SQ..
,~,
\SlS
Nitrate Order
1st Quarter 2013
Depth Total Depth
112.5
105
125.7
145
96
96
I .
Rinsate Samples
Name Date Sample
TWN-1R 2-/lB/ l3
TWN-7R
TWN-4R
TWN-18R
TWN-3R
TWN-2R
Samplers: ::r:oz;><C H,JJ:Jo.. ~/
(-;-o.ri ;l\. ·po..J fl'lc{
!
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISQ,/),4,4
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
Description of Sampling Event:
Field Sample ID
Well Purging Equip Used: I [J 'I pump or ICi: 'I bailer
Purging Method Used: I []12 casings l:l;l:J3 casings
pH Buffer 7.0
Conductance (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg)
Weather Cond.
Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH
Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (m V) =:$;?4~:~~: :r ·;I
Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH
Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (m V)
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
;I Sampler N arne
and initials:
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
pH Buffer 4.0
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:
3" Well:
pH of Water (avg)
/I
(.653h)
(.367h)
Time Gal. Purged
Temp. oc 1::·:
Turbidity (NTU)
Time
Conductance
Temp. oc .... k_.'.............,.............,....__.......,
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I .... :._· ;.;....;o...; ...................... ---...
Turbidity (NTU)
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = _,~{~~
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Type of Sample Sample Taken
Sample Time
Comment
L...-_PI_·e_z-_O_l_0_2_-1_9_-_20_1_3 _ __.1Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Filtered
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ~ See instruction
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I ':L/J~/2D1~· ·
Well Purging Equip Used: [g]pump or ~ bailer
Purging Method Used: [g]2 casings [g]3 casings
pH Buffer 7.0 q,o
I
Conductance ( avg) .....___3"'--0.....;7:..::5=--·';..;.;:;;....._...:..:....;;:...._,;;_____.
Sampler N arne
and initials:
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft):l ....._ 0 __ ·-'_ .. ·\_'. _ ____.I
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:' o ,') ;, ,(.653h)
3" Well: ~··' ·.;,.·f~,",.;2·~·:'(.367h)
pH of Water (avg) .....__...&.;)2=..;.,.. 0___;;;;;,'3_. _.....;;:;............:........;;...,_____.
Well Water Temp. (avg) · I Redox Potential (Eh)l i,.jlJr Turbidityl lY.3. , ·
Weather Cond.
Time 1 1~4··., Ji I Gal. Purged I D ,,, ' I '. Time
Conductance I ~t!J-:lS ~ . I pH I '2 .o::>; I Conductance
Temp. oc I J4".os~ I Temp. oc I "· ·I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 27g.c::~~ ~· .I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;c. •. ',i' · .. I
Turbidity (NTU) I \q.~ ',::. I Turbidity (NTU) I
Time I .: .. ;· I Gal. Purged I '\ ,. ··I Gal. Purged
Conductance I , ,, ·'' I pH I :.· .. . ~"~ I
7 Conductance
Temp. oc I i, •' .• ~ h ;I Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I .: .r '·" I
Turbidity (NTU) I ' Y•
i I ._.<,:t "' Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
I
.I
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 6 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I -6, ,' T=2V/Q= I 0 ' I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ._I ...,i;.A.;._w....., _____ i_¥t.. __ .........:.~----'..;;...l
Type of Sample Sample Taken
VOCs
Nutrients
Heavy Metals
All Other Non Radiologies
Gross Alpha
Other (specify)
Sample Time l l4DD ,:
Comment
Piez-03 02-19-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Filtered Preservative Added Preservative Type
~-~~--~ ~--~---~
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
!A See instruction
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Description of Sampling Event:
Field Sample ID
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Sampler Name
and initials:
Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
See instruction
Well Purging Equip Used: j'tii ~lpump or IIJlJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: LP l2 casings FP ]3 casings
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg)
Weather Cond.
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance
Temp. ot Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time Time Gal. Purged IL...:.'I..;.:.: r..;.:.'·;~;....;.;r ........... ~i.i.;,J
Conductance Conductance pHIL.:i;;'·;;;.;,.,.;.:.;:;::...;::;_;;;.;....;.:.;::;;;..J
Temp. oc Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (m V)
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L.-1 ......,;.;;: ......... ) _;;:2_:............_.......;______..
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated! .... ()'"', _ .............. _ .....
Type of Sample Sample Taken Filtered
VOCs
Nutrients
Heavy Metals
All Other Non Radiologies
Gross Alpha
Other (specify)
Sample Time )2.l~ . I
TWN-01R 02-18-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
~ See instruction
2 of2 ·
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
~ See instruction OENISOJ)~~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: IL..l;;....· s_:-r____;;Q __ v.._o._t"t_e....;.r ...... ·~)\) ........ ___ ,; ___ ·r-....:~_:+<_· __ ;;........._....;.;;;.__.;...:;:;:;:.;.....;,__;;;..:;:_;_; _________ ...::..;_ ......... _ _;_;__.:.::........;_....:.:.~1
Sampler N arne
and initials: I ?t:Mner . H~> 1 hJ~j'/rJi
Field Sample ID
and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: (][]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: I[] :l2 casings [g]3 casings
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I t1b.oo -
I Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) f,.so
Well Water Temp. (avg) Redox Potential (Eh)l · '--\5s:;t) Turbidity I ] ~ 7 -
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event)a..;::l {):::;....-6....._"--" ......;.._.......__.·I
Time Gal. Purged Time I !o ' .. ' I Gal. Purged I I ,,
Conductance pH I b.SO Conductance ,, I pHI <'··I
Temp. oc Temp. oc , ..
•' ,.,., -~ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1-"::,, I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) L ,, I
Time L'_·: --·I Gal. Purged I '"·' I
Conductance I' ·'" ·I pHI ' ·''' I
Temp. oc I '!!, ~I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I " : ,, ·''' I 'y. ,'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I· w' I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 0 gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= L..,;_ ...................... ~ ........... =:;;....!
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Type of Sample
Comment
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
if other than as
" .... ""·"'t-""'rt below)
Sample Time
TWN-02 02-19-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Filtered
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan {QAP)
See instruction ~:~~~~J FIELD DA~~i=l~~Ei~~~~DWATER
Description of Sampling Event: L-11_~ ........ -__ G_-· _'-"_O.._r-"-+~ ...... r ...... -~--· -_,+_rD.:_d_e...;..;......;___._~-"'--;;;.......;.;;"------------..........,;.;;;.......;;._....;.;;;...;;......;..;..........____._"'--_.....~
Location (well name): L....l~ ___ tJ __ ---o--~--------------..... 1
Field Sample ID -I
Sampler N arne
and initials:
and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: (![]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 1]!]2 casings [QJ3 casings
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance L-1 _'f;._q-~.j~-"---..... 1 ~MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) Redox Potential (Eh)l "1 C:J"~-·-
Weather Cond.
Time Gal. Purged I 54 '· · ~: r,;-; Time
Conductance 1-2_315 :~ pH I j,QO: Conductance
Temp. oc Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I "1J:~57?;i· >· ·1
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1\oqs· · Gal. Purged
Conductance I '2:0:S7 t ~-· --J pH Conductance
Temp. oc -I Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU) I Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
(.653h)
'(.367h)
Turbidity I z:. \ <-
Gal. Purged
"'
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water~~ 1~lt,_..5_,.,.9-----., gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I \~ . f
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= l f,.SS -, I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Type of Sample
VOCs
Nutrients
Heavy Metals
All Other Non Radiologies
Gross Alpha
Other (specify)
Sample Taken
N
Sample Vol (indicate
if other than as
specified below)
TWN-03 02-18-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Filtered Preservative Added Preservative Type r-----r---~ ~----r-------~
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
~ See instruction
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I lSI Q\hc:v-+~i ,10,4-ro.t! 'Z.O\":!.."
b@ See instruction
Sampler N arne
and initials: 1-('~nner J.JoJJ,J.-~m
Field Sample ID
and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: lm l2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1. Qu.o..-f erl.!::l' .A) rt;.-lliR_ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I'"""·~· ·-"~_,w_·. __ JJ_ .. · -_o_. _7_......___.::;___.::;---::;:::...;....;;.....;;...:;J
pH Buffer 7. 0 l'-"----7_. C>...;__ __ ____. pH Buffer 4.0 ~.0
Specific Conductance IL.......:.~ 'f..:..~..~....-.....;;____;:_ _ ___JI ~MHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging I Y S/t7D Casing Volume (V)
Conductance ( avg) L...-....lqw:.$b~____;.;::.____;;_ ___ ......J pH of Water ( avg) L-1 _7_, .;....J 4.;...._ ___ ____;_;,_......J
Well Water Temp. (avg) I }t4}iL); · . Redox Potential (Eh)I .S-z'l , ·I Turbidity! J3, '2.5
Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event) I ~~> ·.;. ·
Time 1 13'-\~~·: ~ , Gal. Purged l tocB' , ;· · ·I Time 11 ~4~ .. .. ··I Gal. Purged I }2.6 "·, I
Conductance I ~g7 . pH 7.1~ · I Conductance I qgb :. .I pHI 7·1.5 I
Temp. oc I \4.91 Temp. oc I J4,LJ:J 'I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) SU·,'',, · 'I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I .S.Zf{ ·~· I
Turbidity (NTU) . }"2. ;"f, . Turbidity (NTU) I ]3.;0 1 I
Time l l~$c{: Gal. Purged l l3'2..· < · ·1 Time l l~SL · I Gal. Purged 1.1q9 : ·: I
Conductance L..j'...:.q~g_!_· _ ___.::; ...... pH I ~~.· G ,I Conductance I . 'f~~ ,·,,. . I pH I· .""J,JLf : 'x; I ¢
Temp. oc r lel.4'G ' 7.1~ Temp. oc 1.·)4:4-r .· I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) IL........;;;;S;...;;;-:s;;...J.·I_· _ ___. Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 53L,.·· I• "I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I hl ' '· ·'·) I
White Mesa Mill
)
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1~.--J Y-:......:Y ___ ____,~ gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I g. 7 (J I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o ···
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated Q
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I AvJA_L ·~·
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D q 3x40 rii1 .D D ~ HCL D 0
Nutrients ··~·~-· -~ .,, 100 ml ,. ··,::_~ o ~·."' "'GJ .>''' H2S04' ·-~_.;:··· •,j: ·~
2:' y • .i;·
Heavy Metals D , r o· _...,. 250ml D D HN03 q D
All Other Non Radiologies E:l '-0:•;,, .. Q 250'nii •,. o: D ·;; No Preserv. El 's._q .. ., '
Gross Alpha [j tJ 1,000 ml ·•· D D HN03 '''· D ·o
Other (specify) ' (2g; .,~ S.ample VOlHme ,. ·"
~ D D "; ~· '; :•;, "D I'' ~) ,, ,, '
c'n \or1~e If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I L\~. 93'<'
Comment
A(r;\1,~ on . -~ :4-e.: ·o.t 13 3t; ·
?v.r~c bejtNl ~+ )3~9
', \A),J<;"' IN~ Glet•/". l>u.i-5(.
Lett ~,fc. 111t r~s~~-:
Sample Time ll3S 1 ' ·-}~:
~ See instruction
f.;;,nu . .,.~J. ~ .. rr•'n pt'<;sad-~.. f:'r(\e ctntl Sa111f?•"j
f~r~ec\' Wel\fof' ~. +o+"'l oJ' 12. r:'n"'+e.s.
er)a<:! :~"~· ~~~Vl ~ye,~ ~~Wcd-:a ~+' 1~s ·t
TWN-04 02-18-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
-·-~
'i5~'
'.:c
:.··
'·
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISQJ)~~ ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ~ See instruction
Sampler Name
and initials: I ::=ro:nne~ #oJl~~/rT\:
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 2./ 18/'2:·ol3 · · . I and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: (][]pump or @]bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 002 casings @]3 casings
Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event IL..:r..;...;._, :_w_A.J_.· · _-_0_1 ......;;;..._..;....__.__...:..~
pH Buffer 7.0 IL-/_.o _______ -J pH Buffer 4.0 q.o
Specific Conductance IL.-.-~_4..;...4 __ ..;..._ _ _.1 ~MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft):
Depth to Water Before Purging I 8 7 .H 0 Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water ( avg) ..... I ....;.7....;.··-=Sb ____________ ___.
Well Water Temp. (avg) )tt]q Redox Potential (Eh)l 4'3"7· TurbidityL-1 z_J_. _,· _ _-J
Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event}L-1~;.;;;...~0---'----...J
Time I I $.1Z.· · Gal. Purged L-1 .;.._15_·---'-----'---....J Time I . I Gal. Purged I
,,
I
Conductance Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C Temp. oc I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I · qlf8" ;.;,, Redox Potential Eh (m V) I .,, ,,, ., I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I ~ ' I
Time I )025', Gal. Purged L-1 ~----'-----'----JI Time I J.0~7 I Gal. Purged 12i i' I .~.
Conductance L--. .&...:J ·~~··._c):....' 9.._· --JI pH -z..q:)>··,/:1 Conductance I' ·1·2 ·o() I pHI 7;.,66 ' .I
Temp. oc Temp. oc I ·p1.1 j /I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I !:fa& I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I • ""7.;0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Wa~.fa~ f----:p;~-----, gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I \.q\· I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 11.3() >.
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated '-1 _IS _____ ....J
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs AwA L · '---~-~---~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs ·D D 3x40 m1 ' .,,, D ., D ·;;; HCL D ,. lJ
Nutrients ""g] '· •i.• D ~· lOOml ~ ~D ~ H
""' H2S04 ; .f) ' .IJ
Heavy Metals ,p >~~i·!l" ··EJ ';''rJ!'i '250 m1 ., ,, o·:~? Dl ai] HN03 ··P ~·. ».e;TJ ' ·il' 'i
All Other Non Radiologies D ... D ''· 250ml D " D Xi No Preserv. .:o D ""' .'• ' .
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml '' ·[j '"' D HN03 D D ,, ~
··~. ' . "' Other (specify) ~.·.i;''. [j ./ Sample ';:Olume D :";.;,,: ;:,. 't:J D ·:~ ;,;:
j.
c__ h l or-{~e. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Sample Time 1025
See instruction
Comment
;~~,iv~t~;ttclla-~a:.):Ot;,¥~\ ~nn\a =~:f~(T:~i~ r~~:o~t. v;:~~J. :~~J~an A+
W:~r-:~. ';?~}j.irnt>.s.3-~:fl~<,.:Y'"'r~~w'""1~cl J,;ff . l'.Sl~ .L.4},:;~,'f.t.«J..TJ3JY, . , :· 'Ar~~v~4 ·~~ .. s\4~ j 'H)2\ ~·,·~·rlr)~r' ~,.,/a Gor61l ' p~~t1t '1-o coJle.c.t .StAMfJ;s... o~pfr, :fo V'~~r
~b/LD. StA~l~ . b~~ie~ ""+ tozs. Le.d=t-si+~ "'+. 1o28' . .
TWN-07 02-18-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
.
(i'-
·;;,
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ~ See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ; r~-F Q\A(An-r:.~ ~ '*~~t:
Field Sample ID
Well Purging Equip Used: []f) pump or [QJ bailer
Purging Method Used: [f!]2 casings [QJ3 casings
Conductance (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lL\ .'Lc:l' ·
Weather Cond.
Gal. Purged
Conductance I,· 21D t ; ·
Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 4G'4··~:f~
Turbidity (NTU)
Gal. Purged
Conductance r ,-zJos . .. ·I pH
Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Sampler N arne
and initials:
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
pH Buffer 4.0
I
Casing Volume (V) (.653h)
3" Well: . (.367h) a.....;.....;~==~
Turbidity[·44 . f~:
Time
Conductance
Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (m V) .._I ~..;..;;;.;..;.;~----...
Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged l 13z·~:.:··.
Conductance 2iH).}/ ,, I
Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I y.gq·":t; ·· I
Turbidity (NTU) I
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ._II _;3;.._2 ____ __. gallon(s)
132
Pumping Rate Calculation
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = ;'fl',:~: L..-......;;.........;;.........;;.........;;...;;;;.;;....;.....;;;;.!
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Type of Sample Sample Taken
Sample Time
TWN-18 02-18-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Filtered
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ro·~-~;~~~ljj j "j ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ~~ See instruction
__ ~~.-:~':~U~.-~~, FIELDDATA WORKSHEETFORGROUNDWATER
Sampler Name
and initials: l:J2it;-·f1"#'~·F;~~;;~~.iP~~)t,~:,;A¥:~·ffi'ltf-~?;.(~F>,":·,iiB;;~I
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging l\.:)~:'(j:~a :-W!Ui!''l:M:21ai}:~;~~~-A;;:_,.f.~l and Sampling (if different) I:&N~-W;_;~):fi11}%A~/~~;{~:;;J:}~:i':m~:~':;~;:f~;i::0/:{1~U05l~}fl
Well Purging Equip Used: lJif':lPump or l 'Ot~l bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) l {'#fi~··,~fk@'&l>t@4!5:'(:~;f~;\::~i~~~
Purging Method Used: l ~t1J.?l2 casings 1.-·m:~·q3 casings
sampling Event l-''\'(jifj.:fl1f?/3!'£(::~~\~';:Uetu:fi2J~a;£:S~X.I
pH Buffer 7. 0 l'?ij;_:~~:;~~\;.;~~!@;i;~J.\I{g:f·:~d
Specific Conductance I:;:,'>~J~U~\t;i'ft·~lf:;~~~};~i;,::;::;~:zj 11MHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging ~-~~f~jZ\_:~'~[3!i~(.·).,~j
Conductance (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg)
Weather Cond.
Gal. Purged
Conductance
Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
pH Buffer 4.0
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:
3" Well:
pH of Water (avg)
Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event) [I~~~~
Gal. Purged
Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1.·::-~· .. ;t~~,~·i~~;\;t;L\::~d~;f~~~;~;;l~l
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1Jt~r:;;~J'G~:}::YN:,~:\1::~~tlil Gal. Purged [,r;S::ih:'!i~;t~;K;;;;,:;;~ii}'1(s~1!l
Conductance l:-ru:;:.v:·;:;(@~~~~;t;t:I0itE~H pH IL:i;k:;:_:'1f:~:.:i\i/i:HT;\!::J;~;:~~I
Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1·_;;~:\z;;s;~;~m·;~;;g;s• ·\~;'H
Turbidity (NTU) l,;;;~'yJ:'J':~;~:".i(:}.{\:;;~~t~~~\!M
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = FL.~;:}',»:W;tfl?Li<~(:;<I;::·:.J?id
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = l .. '~~:w~::.:~i;;·,~~-.~,;~~:;7}~\·(;.;·,;;!BN
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1 .~:-~·'·~··i~?~~d.~::j~:;l
Type of Sample Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
if other than as
specified below)
TW4-22 02-ll-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Filtered
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
2 of.7
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 ~~~~-;-~~~..,J~' WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
i~''J -MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEETFORGROUNDWATER
Sampler N arne
and initials: I ;g,~~:KQ~lf¥1~;-\U:Jii~\\\~-~§gt'~~£;~-,;~-~J?.{:\·i;:~-iL'i;;;;J;I
Field Sample ID
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [t11fHI bailer
Purging Method Used: I:1EJ.·:12 casings IIP:Fil3 casings
Sampling Event I'-~.ZS:~~~~~~t1t~;\.:y~Ji~@f:\~)\'~~~:¢W,'~
pH Buffer 7 .o Lf:rt~;~f;jfW]',ifRX~i~.:~~\-i~)~f:~~~;;~l
Specific Conductance
Depth to Water Before Purging ~~~~~
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event
pH Buffer 4.0
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~~~~~(.653h)
3" Well: (.367h)
Conductance (a vg) lf,tf~-:~~:.i~\\~;:,:tmi'·~)t1:i'';i:i~~~t~f~;([\J;¢:0zmi:-;I pH of water (a vg) N1--0V~i?i;.:,:t~;;:fs'~~:f{:0ftmi~![l[~l-·k;{1{i;'~}'X\~;I
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1::-fX;xf})~f&-~ti~:ZI Redox Potential (Eh)l,·?;•}t,.~;i·;~~~i~-1:1i~{,~~~ Turbidity(,~~~~~\Gtffgi:~·;;§~?,;l::l
Weather Cond.
Temp. °C
Redox Potential Eh (m V) [·:;t;:~·i.]J1~'0;;?%-~)~\~;_I
Turbidity (NTU) l:@~;;*ttf/~z{~£;i~,~;:,~$i(ii1(1
Time I::J,'_;Xii:~:;fi!~E';~~\tJi;~c'-,::~itd Gal. Purged F-HU.i(j~~;;;r::_ti~},~:>;~;ff,~I{,;-1
Conductance k~M~j-~::,ly:~\~:~\,;.:;_:':{\;:~~wr;:l pH l~_::;c.:~\f~,\f(~~Etrtr;;~;;:";~·.~:Ji}.;'i-l~H
Temp. oc rts:z;;~;!.~~;;;ti~~~:;;r:~1;;':i::::::~i\U
Redox Potential Eh (m V) l,§,;:~\~1t1'\1i\f~!t1&~Hs.·;,;:i£JX;{H
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time Gal. Purged
Temp. oc
Turbidity (NTU)
Temp. oc
Turbidity (NTU)
1 of:2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Type of Sample Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
if other than as
specified below)
Sample Time
TW4-24 02-11-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Filtered
Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Location (well name): lizt$\P{~·~'}ig';\.·;t:.·' .. <:',·;::~~\L';f'.:,,i?,U;:f: li:•tX'.~':·,~",:Jb:.:?\:1 IN,::iGi2J:R}~::.\;,:.}ii:::t'?liE~'idHX;:t:::~t~~f:J·:.;J;:·:·t;;·_;{(f;l
Field Sample ID b2~fuS).D:y;~,·aiii;:i .. ~::{!¥2il1'·tihtHcix:~;/\·~ ... C,'?J:":;)id
Date and Time for Purging l .:··~:'?~·fl'~i'[-f{4~\?~Bf~:~·> :.·::+hi and Sampling (if different) I=··~ =~~~u.;.;.;==~~~
Well Purging Equip Used: IJ~l;lpump or lj·l1ij}il bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L·~;&~;i!J4i*L£d~%;·;;Z;~:;;;;;h\\\li.i.i!~;~,l
Purging Method Used: LJ:;LJ2 casings 1 -~tEJ~;Ji 3 casings
Sampling Event I '~·N·x~··ifk';~Vf\.;r.::1z'li¥.L.'l.P~t?'&·;;,Ek•J
pH Buffer 7.0 l.-:~_:.)~'iH;¥D/:'.j,;~Y'~:·,_·~;::;gil
Specific Conductance k>·;,:.(:':'~'ft'q~7!:)}W;{>;.·::;:;I ~-tMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging l;\,·~;5-:g;:·~®',Tg;}.~::l
Conductance (avg) ~-~}/i.;~x:::;-,:::;~:}:·:~~~:;w::?q'~;;~~~·-;;:;~l~~).£:,;;'~,-:]:';1
Well Water Temp. (avg) I.J>:~::,';i~]'~~lij]~frzfj\:';.1
Weather Cond.
Temp. oc
Turbidity (NTU) r
Time I \d . .\'':,;t;:;;·:.~~;Nc::3~'::'Td Gal. Purged l;,:t;,~V:).F;::·'.:XL(::·;;;~~i·2]
Conductance k\::;'5:::.};{';\)1;·~";;);:{/{~{'}tf pH EI:z·m~·1"Y;:ni2i~\~:>r~;1,':>f;]
Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ['~.;;;,}::::'''(i~·_:.~;;;',/;\,,\·.::'!.i:··f
Turbidity (NTU) I .. ' . ~ :~~;:;;_k;:'J;,·, •.<·',);:;]
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
pH Buffer 4.0
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~~~~K1 (.653h)
3" Well: ; (.367h)
Gal. Purged
Temp. oc
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L;>:,;;·;;;;~~:~·'f'JHj:t}:.;~;,;:j'~J
Turbidity (NTU)
Time E;?f;\'tf·i:/"~:;'it.·1~~:1f Gal. Purged Fs?;I01,;:.:'~~.;~:5L\;B:-~i,i'i~~~
Conductance I,))\;:[Q~~;.;;);\Y3{~~\;·:;.:\~K\f pH I';::·:~~Mi:~.~r~';m:,·;:'g@~~};;f
Temp. oc l:';<~;~q·)liH$/&;:s;:.:;I.;/;~;::1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) f::;;;:;·p,·'(~·:;i:~\';.'·i;;:&'\lN>;;;;~f
Turbidity (NTU) 1:_,';·\:::._·:ii}'-}}:i't'~·}c;SHI
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Type of Sample Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
if other than as
specified below)
Sample Time
TW4-25 02-11-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Filtered p . T Preservative Added
t-----.----f reservatiVe ype 1----..,.-----~
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
See instruction
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISO,!)~~ ~~4 MINES
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
_ ... ~ See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: IL.....L.l _~T......;..Q......;.._v.._()._ri..:..c..:..r ..... : ;_:A)_· . ...;..;+..:..r_tA._{_c.. __ z._o_J3_......;.. _____ ......;........;..__...;....:.._...;.._ ____ ..:....._..:....._........._-:..~
Sampler N arne
and initials: L,.,;.l-r(...;..·...;..q__n _n~_r_......;.._......;;;..::........;..:;£....-:::..,.._......;;.. __ ...;...~
Field Sample ID 1-rwA>-b5_ DZ H~2DI~
·._ .. , and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [QJ bailer
Purging Method Used: 002 casings I D '13 casings
pH Buffer 7.0 L-1 ....;.7.;,_· .• _D_--__ _...;...~·I
Specific Conductance L-, . ....:..tf-=-'1..:.....--......;.. __ ____,I~MHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging I L) S .7 D
Conductance ( avg) L--.'1 ...... 8~b=--_......;.......;._ ___ __.
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
pH Buffer 4.0
Casing Volume (V) 4" Went b2:2.'-l i
3" Well: o .. ,. :.·"·
1(.653h)
(.367h)
pH of Water ( avg) L--.-l7~.-•...:..l __,L\ __ ......;..._ _ ____.
Well Water Temp. (avg) I l'-\:';-\'G . ._ Redox Potential (Eh)l :)"'2..1-:i·· · · Turbidity! ·13;2..5
Ext'l Amb. Temp. oc (prior sampling event) I 7:~ '
Time Gal. Purged Time I I Gal. Purged I
..
I
pH I ....... ___________ __, Conductance Conductance I·
.,,
I pHI .. , I ...
Temp. oc Temp. °C I .. I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ,: . /)'~ " I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ,. I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~·-. , .. 1 Turbidity (NTU) I y.~'· .I
Time Gal. Purged I ...... ·......;... _ ____;,.....;;..... ........ Time I' :f·_ I Gal. Purged 1.;.,_ ·-··;I
pH 11.,;;.. . ..:....;,_ __ __.I Conductance Conductance I : I pHI -.•-I •Y , ....
Temp. oc Temp. oc I·. ~;. ' .I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I · · ~;:_;· .·· :I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I,_, 5 ·,,, I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged )L)9 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = L-1 ...;....;-_• _...;.;.___ _ __. \2. T = 2V/Q = I g ,-:J{),, 'I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) IO
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I?)
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N y N
VOCs D ,, D 3x40 nil 0 ' D ·~~ HCL D tJ ·' .,
Nutrients :~::r';"'· D ,<;, 100 ml ., " I' o ~ ~ %. ' if2S04,. Q " D ... Icc ,,,
Heavy Metals tJ,!J! ., tJ·;•?:l'' 250 ri}l '" '• ''> ,: ¥ ,.o ···: il3 ·i,~i!f', HN03 "' ,,, ,,,
: ,t~·~. D .'' ' ; ,, ', ·"' .,, "'
All Other Non Radiologies D ,, 0 250 inl i'• D '' D No Presenr. .,,D ·o
'' Gross Alpha [] [] ·&,, 1,000 ffi1 D :0 ,,
.,,,HNO~ ,, ,' D D ,,
Other (specify) :i };, ,f, Sample voh1me , . .. ,. '" ,, ~ in·
. ,,, . .. :m; '·' ~ fi. D ... D . '"'''\:, ·o ~~ '·
''.~''· '·
,, ;
'1' . ;, ;: '· ,,, r
Gh )or ide.
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth L-1 4...;....;9_. ,_L\3 ___ __.1 Sample Time I. 1351 .. ·
See instruction
TWN-65 02-18-2013 lno not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabC
Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Depth to Water Summary
@ estimated dry area
MW·5 perched monitoring well showing e 5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW4•12 temporary perched monitoring well 0 5583 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-10 h d . . . A 5586 temporary perc e nitrate monltonng
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ·1 perched piezometer showing
(ii) 5593 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-28 temporary perched monitoring well
~5581 installed March, 2013 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2013 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/may13/Uwl0313.srf C-1
NAME: Garrin Palmer, Tanner Holliday
DATE: 3/28/2013
TIME WELL Static level TIME WELL Static Level TIME
852 MW-1 64.26 1011 MW-4 70.03 815
944 MW-2 109.65 1009 TW4-1 63.85 808
952 MW-3 83.15 1013 TW4-2 65.33 900
955 MW-3A 85.11 1005 TW4-3 50.71 938
1040 MW-5 106.12 1017 TW4-4 70.00 941
1046 MW-11 87.41 1001 TW4-5 57.82 928
1018 MW-12 108.51 1019 TW4-6 69.25 1010
1050 MW-14 103.60 1010 TW4-7 64.84 906
1037 MW-15 106.37 1007 TW4-8 64.92 858
947 MW-17 73.65 1003 TW4-9 55.62 847
844 MW-18 70.21 959 TW4-10 56.32 839
812 MW-19 55.88 1015 TW4-11 56.73 849
859 MW-20 85.80 1028 TW4-12 41.52 842
807 MW-22 66.83 1032 TW4-13 46.91 817
1015 MW-23 119.15 1034 TW4-14 85.86 837
941 MW-24 114.00 957 TW4-15 60.08 831
936 MW-25 73.14 1048 TW4-16 59.28 829
957 MW-26 60.08 1045 TW4-17 73.70 820
936 MW-27 51.80 931 TW4-18 58.40 822
947 MW-28 76.05 1104 TW4-19 58.88 835
1057 MW-29 101.65 955 TW4-20 58.01 827
1053 MW-30 75.25 934 TW4-21 56.61 825
1050 MW-31 67.26 952 TW4-22 55.50 904
1045 MW-32 73.70 1021 TW4-23 63.89 1330
1007 MW-33 Dry 950 TW4-24 61.30
1053 MW-34 107.92 1047 TW4-25 47.48
1013 MW-35 112.40 1023 TW4-26 62.55
1010 MW-36 110.56 1036 TW4-27 81.57
1055 MW-37 110.15 1030 TW4-28 36.31
1037 TW4-29 72.06
1039 TW4-30 78.03
1041 TW4-31 84.41
WELL Static Level TIME WELL Static Level
PIEZ-1 62.33 NA DR-1 ABANDON
PIEZ-2 30.12 NA DR-2 ABANDON
PIEZ-3 43.80 853 DR-S 83.09
PIEZ-4 47.97 1008 DR-6 94.38
PIEZ-5 43.55 1006 DR-7 92.26
TWN-1 54.55 848 DR-8 51.00
TWN-2 28.41 845 DR-9 86.55
TWN-3 35.90 842 DR-10 78.15
TWN-4 46.30 1000 DR-11 98.28
TWN-5 69.50 958 DR-12 89.34
TWN-6 75.49 950 DR-13 69.86
TWN-7 87.25 834 DR-14 76.38
TWN-8 62.53 838 DR-15 92.94
TWN-9 62.10 NA DR-16 ABANDON
TWN-10 80.70 830 DR-17 64.80
TWN-11 69.13 NA DR-18 ABANDON
TWN-12 28.25 819 DR-19 63.15
TWN-13 45.45 816 DR-20 55.22
TWN-14 62.10 901 DR-21 107.33
TWN-15 91.56 826 DR-22 DRY
TWN-16 47.48 812 DR-23 70.62
TWN-17 33.64 823 DR-24 43.85
TWN-18 58.13 NA DR-25 ABANDON
TWN-19 52.19
Time Well Depth*
I 22.1 MW-4 7&.4.
121V MW-26 _5<g. 15
lo3S' TW4-19 .57.YCJ
I :liS TW4-20 55 .. 77
't:Z~> TW4-4 'tD. 'iS
TWN-2
TW4-22
TW4-24
TW4-25
Weekly Inspection Form
Comments
Flow '1 # Lf 6-p _/V\.
Meter 12.KI:Z .. 'i3
Flow l 0 . 0 6-p ./-"\.
Meter 2.lfo7 t>6 1 ~
Flow t4.b &-P.M
Meter &"l:l-61,.60
Flow 'Lt.< 6-PA
Meter s:Js:s g:z . ..sti
Flow >?. y r;.p .M
Meter J,&o7.(l4
Flow
Meter
Flow
Meter
Flow
Meter
Flow
Meter
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
C[e]) No
~No
C[ei) No
~No
(Ye} No
(Ve§:> No
~§)No
~\No -
@No
~No -
Yes_®
Yes ffJ'O) ...__.......
Yes~
Yes J<!9>
Yes~
Yes~
Yes ~
Yes tKi9
Operational Problems (Please list well number): -n .. .>..v .. :z., TW'-l-.2,61 Tuy -2'1 1 rw t.f-2$
~re. ?vrre--,...+ \'{ b "=;'2:) i"' 1hdl e.-A liL..,_cJ 4 r < .A..Q! }'' t o ff-Ca...+-•'"aA...tC-l..
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): i'?t-rte"*,t Claw ·M.'=-f?C •tA. .k\W-'1.
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Depth* Comments
1"1 L? MW-4 lh 52.2 Flow 4ri1. &-f>A
Meter 46:22. £;o
I '"SoX MW-26 -~fl .:Y':i Flow [/ .. 3 6-P..M
Meter ~q~~~4~S4
l'-1.20 TW4-19 -~7 t;q Flow 1 4,. D G-Pfoi\.
Meter f?3J t..f.2K ... ob
j 3D.5; TW4-20 __ t;t_tJ2 Flow q~'l 6\'P'\
Meter ~.1~£<-L.Dl
·Lsi£ TW4-4 1?l iO Flow g¢-o G-P.A
Meter 816-l. l7
TWN-2 Flow
Meter
TW4-22 Flow
Meter
TW4-24 Flow
Meter
TW4-25 Flow
Meter
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
A/o + CZfY::h + t't>e'\ A.l yr: i.
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
cfeS) No
~No
@No
@iJ No
eYe~ No -
('[e]> No
Cfe§> No
eYe~ No
@No
d~ No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date , {a.al J.3
Time Well Depth* Comments
·\~0{, MW-4 CKO.S Flow u ~') ; ., ;,__pt-J\
Meter 10\L\S~£'~
rYoY MW-26 bg .. ~o Flow 10.0 f i=>}J\ l.r l • \
Meter 2'1Y \ f/7. q K
Jg:St TW4-19 5,8'. "16 Flow 14.0 /,;P.M.
Meter f1"'173tt.t.oo
, •• o~>-M •
l'i{)Q TW4-20 S1.g5 Flow lb :7 G-Pfl\
Meter 5~~\Z2...8!
lY II TW4-4 b,Cl,ql Flow x . .b
Meter i3202.c,
TWN-2 Flow
Meter
TW4-22 Flow
Meter
TW4-24 Flow
Meter
TW4-25 Flow
Meter
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
(YeS) No
c~ves\ No
(Y~~s No
cfeS)No
~ No
{YeS) No -
Ai-~' <J .. eft No
(Ye) No
~No
(Yes) No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ----------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Depth* Comments
~ )2.'-1"0 MW-4 t;q_z.o Flow L\.0 G~PI'-\
Meter t5600.33
1'2.23 MW-26 53.Y'f Flow 10 ;::, &PI"\
Met,er .1. '-1 (,b 50 .. 5 g
1'3Y3 TW4-19 59 ,b3, Flow l4 0
Meter 8~(;.02'1.06
i'lt1 TW4-20 5~.t.t·z.. Flow 9L6 &Pfl\
Meter 57J'l~S-S7
. 1'2'1~ TW4-4 '70-0 i Flow 8 .2. c.,:...p;v\
Meter t Z2..6'1~~
)33/ TWN-2 2~,'11> Flow 13 . .:-$ ci-PM
Meter s·-\'7.3
12.\:3 TW4-22 5..., ~6 .:::;,1. Flow U5. t GPM.
Meter 'I'SY, '"\
i'l.oS TW4-24 _sg,(.. \ Flow l/ a I ~.;:>-L G-P/·\
Meter '1'3/"-'"1 Gi v....::.., 1
1343 TW4-25 SY,g'S Flow iS{.\ (_,PM
Meter 6 i G:2.. \
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
cY~No
c3]p No
(~~No
(YevNo -,. ... ........-~-....... c::y-, --:..as No
~Yes .. 2Jo
-~
/~N '···--.~§)_) 0
,¥ .. .,.~·--"-"· ./~····v-es--1 No ( -..__,.-
ex§) No
Cve~ No --
... ~--·--(_y~s..)No
(-Y~No -r-v-es) No
(,.;;:y ei)No
/r""~ C. eS) No (fes·) No
~s~o
~)No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): --------------------------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Monthly Depth Check Form
Date 1/3 i /2.0 !} Name ~1\{)e.r I '1 , , I T oll.d~?(
Time Well Depth* Time Well Depth*
rz:~J MW-4 lQ~~ tL.Jiq -TWN-1 5i5'0
l'Z.Ht TW4-1 (,~.\':) Pi6'i TWN-2 28. i::?
lDi TW4-2 t;(,.g~ i::JD7 TWN-3 32..0
lz.z.1 TW4-3 1..\q, '3'7 \'i Jl TWN-4 Llt .00
j2J-t1 TW4-4 /b.o~ Jt.\3.5 TWN-7 8775
rz..tct TW4-5 .SSAt l'-fYD TWN-18 57.C£5
n.:so TW4-6 k,q.r;o l'iOD MW-27 5i-'i7
l7..31 TW4-7 67.b.l \-')3i MW-30 75.8i
p.i.j~ TW4-8 6£.15 10,"1. 1':::>'2-5 MW-31 '-7.7q
1"2'-Y. TW4-9 5.3-ZS
}'2..\b' TW4-10 ss.L-fO
!3•3f:> TW4-11 5.(,.£ l
rsoo TW4-12 4D~So
i:J u".:> TW4-13 ~.!;,8j
\:2 Q_b. TW4-14 l)_i:,.S7
i?i'L TW4-15 5g.l3
) ')'2..'?:> TW4-16 &::,{Y. i3
l:::>~k TW4-17 ]~.$5
l•·n:? TW4-18 .$4,.77
ll{£5 TW4-19 5'i.q3
\2tYj TW4-20 £:6~ i9
t~?..l TW4-21 53-36
rzbb TW4-22 s~-zq
l~lq TW4-23 h'-\.70
rz.o3 TW4-24 sg.b:3
ll-115 TW4-25 S:~·gi..-1
i3iS TW4-26 b."JDS
()6~ TW4-27 £22-Sb
Comments: (Please note the well number for any comments)
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Deoth* Comments
J64l MW-4 6K,:J.-~ Flow ttl.i &PM
Meter au 67..1 g-
j,S36 MW-26 ~'1,60 Flow le> .. J GP.;V\
Meter ;l'HttH~ ~0
i ~.~_~q TW4-19 _1!)7. f4 Flow 14 .t)
Meter ~rtst->K7~00
It; 4.5' TW4-20 --~q .. 1o Flow IO~. t;.P.M
Meter .,.5'~lltt],qq
J L.tl-["~ TW4-4 £Cf ~ 4..5"" Flow ~-o t-P.;tA
Meter 2.3.-5 00"'" iO
i21~ TWN-2 _t;Cf, 7K Flow fg.,.7 6-P,}-/\
Meter 4205' 6
1222 TW4-22 _t::;'-1,.2.0 Flow lK'v4 GP.)A
Meter 2t-1 (/q~ "Lb
L21Cf TW4-24 .59~f7 Flow ig""2 tP,)-1\
Meter 2X'P-1.3 .. LO
t 2.\l TW4-25 qs. c..to Flow I b_f! &PM
Meter 1 f?r72*oo
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
(Y9~ No
ifiS) No
(YeS) No
@?j No
.~_No
Cie~ No -
(Je); No
(Yes) No
(Yes) No
(Ye~ No
~
_(ye~ No
(Yes') No
~
(Ye~ No
(Yes\ No
\YeS\ No
0{e?\ No
~e~\ No
~es) No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ----------------------------
*Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Date . 2 I n i 1:>
Time Well
10)..0 MW-4
lt;ao MW-26
I toO TW4-19
6q..so TW4-20
·1o.so TW4-4
04CJD TWN-2
D'120 TW4-22
D'ltO TW4-24
10850 TW4-25
Weekly Inspection Form
Depth*
£$,50
~X' 17
.!:.:~-6.5'
.56~ 78
h 'l,Cf ti
1.1 .. 05
54 ,.53
~~!5:::3
6o~6ff
55d:L3
Name r_.. _____ ,...·,: r:A_· ',"A~... 1r......, .: .. 4 ...... _, .... ~L· ~· .... ~ .:=; [., ..... !:--~ • lJ,_,_y I I} LK. '
Comments
Flow Lf .. 4 6-i?...;V\.
Meter -;Z(i..lD8. 3"Z
Flow iO;O &PM
Meter ?.. 'i'L8' <15 .. ~ t
Flow I z;. {) GP.M
Meter C} 03 L') g t../.0()
Flow I 0~ i 6-P..M
Meter .SY25.2Dd 5 q
Flow lSc \ &-t>.M
Meter 2&'c..Ls~s-" oo
Flow lf/1.... ~p~
Meter J?iJQ/ __ cn
Flow {(p. +-c,.,r.A
Meter '-iS'l'Lqo
Flow iJS ... O t;..PA
Meter i.i~L1:2 .. 3D
Flow i 7 ... ~.5 t-;>~
Meter 2Cf5'16.bll
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
<1~ No
@ No
(Y~ No
(@]) No
~ No
(/j~ No
~~ e91 No
&_e§) No
Yes No
Yes No
~-No
eM) No
(!_~ No
('(~ No
{fe§) No
(Vei; No
{Ye~ No
~ No
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): -------------------------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Date +I uri 15
Time Well Deoth* Comments
10f7 MW-4 ~'g~£0 Flow L-L,4 6PM
Meter .. '1 j /(,2.5. 73
/OJ L/ MW-26 -~g t;O Flow IO.C> r..:P...,v\
Meter -:<:r:; 17q g_ ot
I sOD TW4-19 ~q .. 1.-fi..f Flow 111-.. D 6-PA
Meter '1~16q~b()C)
JOiD TW4-20 7q go Flow iD~3 &P...-0-
Meter 5·y~.-1 r76 .. Cf2..
102.0 TW4-4 £q __ gg Flow <!,..7 GP~
Meter 33£03 .. :J.3
(Yqt;;f? TWN-2 .27.47 Flow J&'~Cf ?PA
Meter i ?J'J L-1 7. ;( Lj
lOOh TW4-22 _t;l-1.,/to Flow 1g~4 &P.M
Meter ~lfl7.6o
IDOl TW4-24 £0~.Jz..l Flow ; f5~5
Meter h3g0 t4 .67
oqss·· TW4-25 Lh· .. ::! 5l Flow 1& .. 3' 6-P..M
Meter Yi5.5tl, g.5
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
~ No
@No
®S .. No
~No
@No
~ No
~No
~ No
('fe~ No
~No
Cf_e§J No
deiJ No
~ No
<Yes) No
~No
~No
d§l No
CieS) No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ---------------
*Depth is measured to the nearest 0.0'1 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Depth* Comments
}~,~~ MW-4 67.l6 Flow 4 .·3
Meter:> 7c~ ,CJI
il.f3i MW-26 G'Z.. \ t.t Flow \!J '\ c:-i'::>r\
Meter ~"S.79f5. l5
ISba TW4-19 k,b.b2.. Flow }L\.D VPIV\
Meter qyos7~loo
}43l TW4-20 5/,'1<:_ Flow '9.f( ~-r) /"''\
Meter .5'-\Sbl8 .. ~7
·J~'12. TW4-4 {;Cf .'/!.-( Flow 8.5 &PI"\
Meterr~6-19Z.O
}Y \q TWN-2 2G:. 4-r Flow l8 < (1 D PiVt
Meter 1S g \2~3
l<1'Z.B TW4-22 S6>JO Flow I 3r 2.. G-P~'-'\
Meter Z&07.·7
}u-z_~ i \ -TW4-24 /D.os Flow } g, '2... &Pi"'\
Meter g 1.b9S.1
lurs j I TW4-25 :S8.oo Flow !8.i C-f'J'I\
Meter 5~3~$.{
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
I
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
c=:res ;No
Cy8S)No
.P",.,..,., .~,.......~· ...... ("'(,~~ No
(~-y~~~'No
c./y~~No
(Ye~ No
~~G-S)No ( ~-...... ~~------, ~ No
.. -. ~-~ YE;S )Jo
( 'tej; No
(~::~~X~No
<:y~~No -.............,~ .•.. • ,r.P.
(~-pxe_s'} No
''(_y~ No
c·'Fes) No
~)No
---C5i)s No
-~ eve No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): -------------------------------
*Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Monthly Depth Check Form
Date 2./2'(?/'ZCI3 Name :1]-(ln<r 1-}oid:q
Time Well Depth* Time Well De~th*
rs.og MW-4 ?.q. iJ j'-i.DD TWN-1 5t-l.lq
j~Ob TW4-1 bL-l. rz._ r~-ss TWN-2 z:1. lt-J
1""~13 TW4-2 ss,£s \L{lO TWN-3 -:s-s.go
!362... TW4-3 .so.gq 1'-\iLi TWN-4 \,.t sl '=<1
13}5 TW4-4 b'1 ,qq l'-fZ.i TWN-7 <6'1.Li ~
lz.S £> TW4-5 SI.CfO li-\\q TWN-18 ~·sg.il
13l/ TW4-6 f>Cj,gD Y3i1 MW-27 Sl.(,g'
r~o[S TW4-7 £S.OY 13<-iS MW-30 75:-z.o
!30Y TW4-8 .s,q.L.b j'::)'i'Z. MW-31 6 7 . .'"S,j
l3b0 TW4-9 ,..!;, /b .':) '0
i1S"b TW4-10 :sc. ,E:;'3.
l~lD TW4-11 Sl.lD
t-:)2Z-TW4-12 '-ll.bO
r~zLl TW4-13 i./7 S-6
\3?...-£ TW4-14 t£.27
1Z.53 TW4-15 /S.I9
'i3L!O TW4-16 5CJ .t-\S
)3"38' TW4-17 '7Lf i 10
ll..j c::> TW4-18 S~-65
i433 TW4-19 £.ti.t5
)"Z.51 TW4-20 c~-~c_
l~b~ TW4-21 ~L\.oq
\21.\~ TW4-22 5<1.{)3
i~~s TW4-23 f:::.Lt-7..0
rz_"iS TW4-24 {0·1\
r~:Sb. TW4-25 S~.l~
i53L. TW4-26 6Z,Rk
1'30g TW4-27 x·z,o<
Coa:nments: (Please note the well number for any comments)
* Depth is measured to the nearest O.Oi feet
Weekly Inspection Form
Date ;s/c;/,_3
Time Well Depth* Comments
iOL.t7 MW-4 6&"':20 Flow wy a .. GP~
Meter 42578~30
i2Y£< MW-26 §Cf .. l!) Flow lo ... o G.P..JV'
Meter 305&~:2--26
i :2.0 .2 TW4-19 74 In Flow 14~0 kP.M
Meter 'l6171h .DrJ
L2Li~ TW4-20 57~45' Flow q,.4 6-f'..v\.
Meter 5Y 73.26.63
·1oSD TW4-4 £CL?JL/ Flow >? ,.,
-··"pi.. (;.p;v\
Meter Lf% 7 ·-; i ()
j,;l.3~_ TWN-2 3L7f Flow i>S .. 6 GPJv\
Meter :J.o:J.7)w~ JO
Ll '-11 TW4-22 5S~40 Flow 18 .. 3 &P~
Meter tlb63:. bL)
1.2..3i? TW4-24 61.,20 Flow I ~L 'i &fM
Meter !Ool2.£.l :rG
122<1 TW4-25 6.5.~'10 Flow 17~ ;;2 Gf_;V\
Meter 66; 5:2 ~ 30 ·
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
C!J~ ~& No
(_Je~ No
(Y~ No
~)No -
cW No
ere!> No
.....
(?e_§) No
(@" No
CYf?.§) No
C{e§J No
~No
('188) No -
@ No
~ No
(~ No
(YeS) No
{YeS) No
7{~ No -
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): -----------------------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
Weekly Inspection Form
Time Well Depth* Comments
l2t..Jg MW-4 67,.LI? Flow t.t. 4. t; PM
I Meter t-IS1'613.g4
f~ LiLt MW-26 ,4/.fO Flow fo, 11 &-PA
Meter 3D77:2f. J.t.{
I03D TW4-19 £0 !1;2. Flow I i.\ .o &-P .A
Meter '1'80145: DD
'1 L-11 TW4-20 t;,f( ~()0 Flow 1~q Gi'A
Meter ..:.t;"'-IR&'£~~-'lo
\ 2 .!)'I TW4-4 ·7o~ t.3 Flow 'l .. 1-· Gf;tf\. ;
Meter Ytt47~ .. n5?'
]1'10 TWN-2 1.ti.¥L1 Flow t7S 9 r;Pl"\
Meter J.t.to'-1 7. ~X'
L2;2/ TW4-22 67"ys-Flow lfldo t:PA
Meter 7~ioq. 7£
1133 TW4-24 t4 I~ t.D Flow i~ .. t) r;PAA
Meter ii6271l-· 24
t 'L3£ TW4-25 1)5 .. 60 Flow i.S.2 &PA
Meter \ ~tJ6·-s: r..to
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational {If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
~ No
~
Qe]) No I
Yes No
Yes No
~ No
~-No
eYeS\ No
ere~ No ----~
({e§} No
~eS)No
G'e.§) No
@§) No
. @ No
<@ No
f{e.i) No
~e§) No
('7~ No
;re~ No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): -----------------------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
)
)
}
}
Weekly Inspecti on Form
Time Well Depth* Comments
}02:2 MW-4 77v05 Flow {.,LY &P__..v\
i Meter~ r; Y{]&_J{). 7 b
lOi g MW-26 ..sg .. 70 Flow tD .; 0 bocf_J/\_
Meter 3oq5...s·3 .3~
ILIJO TW4-19 s·cr ~gs· Flow }Lf .. o &P~
Meter 'l'tb5 il ,;00
{0J3 TW4-20 ~7~b0 Flow Ci .. o &P..AA.
Meter .55 rJ '33 -~~z:;
·1 o25 TW4-4 76,gu. f Flow g· r) ' ............ &f/V\
Meter _s LL5"Sl v ~o
D£153 TWN-2 ;J.g;' .. 3 0 Flow )CLo GP#\
Meter 2 77 :2..2 .. g J
Joo7 TW4-22 .155 ... '17 Flow Jg ~D G-P~
Meter 14Cf'ID .. ~O
6Cf.57 TW4-24 6i..YO Flow l&'.J ?P~
Meter J316~L2D
O'i'i<i TW4-25 bD ~Y5 Flow I g ~ 6 {;,p .JV\.
Meter 8'1£..\\5 .63
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
((2) No
(YeS) No -
(~ No
(fes) No -
/·Yes) No
,>·v e§) No
'-······
0§ No
~ No -
;r·~ No l
{fes) No t ----~Ei~ No
<Ye~ No
~e'j No
{Ye~ No
C{i$ No
~~No
r·ve~ No
~~ rYes\ No
' '
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): ------------------------------
* Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
A\\ \..VeJls 1..-/e..-r-e... c.. k~c k.-e c;l D /\
[... \,....e,..t:..{LJ .3 -l g-~
Weekly Inspection Form
Date 3/2s I 1 ·3 s
Time Well Depth* Comments
0Lf4g MW-4 l7~'' Flow LL!..\ &1>~
Meter .5g5o6~ ;o
D9t..f5 MW-26 ,t'· 7 o L L> Flow io ~ l t:{J,A..r\
Meter 3112\7 f5
IOI..\0 TW4-19 t~. 7t2 Flow it..t .. o &-i>~
Meter iOJ4640~00
oq '-12 TW4-20 sg .. J7 Flow 'L.S GPA
Meter 551637.ClO
·QCf5j TW4-4 72 .. 43 Flow B~E t-P;V\.
Meter £g'7J6, 76'
oq3.;2. TWN-2 27.39, Flow iS .. '\ Gf>JV\.
Meter JH>oq., q \
Qq3q TW4-22 ~~S .. 7o Flow '9>~ i.f &PA
Meter jg77-'iLl
OCJ36 TW4-24 b L. g-D Flow . HL i G-PM
Meter itlY/{4:2 b3
OCf-LQ TW4-25 bb.,. ()(1 Flow JS~D t;PI-'\.
Meter q q3 bq •. get
Operational Problems (Please list well number):
System Operational (If no note
anv problems/corrective actions)
("'Te) No
(~ No
~\\ ~No
.(Y~2 No -
<YeS No
~ No
(tYEi§l) No
(-~~~ No
@ No
(Yes) No
{fes) No
~ No
<fe]) No
@~No
<fe§) No
~ No
@$) No
(ye_$) No
Corrective Action(s) Taken (Please list well number): -------------------------------
*Depth is measured to the nearest 0.01 feet.
TabD
Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
@ estimated dry area
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing e 5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW0
4-12 temporary perched monitoring well
5577 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-10 h d . . . <>5586 temporary perc e n1trate momtonng
well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
~ 5594 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-27 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5525 installed October, 2011 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING o 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are pumping wells
KRIGED 4th QUARTER, 2012 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/feb13/Uwl1212.srf D-1
TabE
Hydro graphs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
-c.
E
.c
= -(I)
E
i=
~
(I) > 0
(I) > (I)
...J
~ (I) ..... ~
'f""" I z 3: I-
£~/90190
l ~19 ~10 ~
l~HO/vO
~ ~~v~t6o
~ ~/9l/l0
0 ~10 ~/90
0~/llHO
60/90/LO
90/9 ~ll~
90/~0/90
0
1.0 "'¢
K::: v l1
~ "' j
/
~
v
0 6 1.0
------L.-----=::::: [> ~
~~
v
0
N 1.0
0
M 1.0
~
0
1.0 1.0
0 «> 1.0
(;.)
0
0
N 0'1 6
Depth Below Measuring Point {ft.)
N 0
0
0'1 6 0
0
0'1
6
0
6
r-----+-----+-----+------11-----+-----+ 06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
.__ ___ ...__ ___ ..~....-___ ....~-___ ....~-___ --~.-___ .....,.L 11/22/13
-I :e z
I 1\.)
~ ... CD ..,
r CD < CD
0 < CD ..,
::t 3
CD -~
C'"
3
"'C -
(..) ........
0
(..)
0>
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
(..)
(]l
0
(..) .to.
0
(..)
(..)
6
(..) N
0
(..)
~
0
(..)
~
0
r-----t----+-----+---+-----+---+-----+ 06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
L_ __ _L ___ .J...._ __ _L ___ .J__ __ __j_ ___ ...~--__ ___._ 11/22/13
-1 :E z
I w
~ .... CD ..,
r CD < CD
0 < CD ..,
::t
3
CD -~
C"
3
"'C -
01 0
0
~ ~ 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
~ 0
0
w 01
0
w 0 6
N 01
0
N 0
0
~
01
0
~
0 6 01 6 0
0
06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
-1 :E z I ~
~ .... (I) ..,
r (I) < (I)
0 < (I) ..,
::t
3
(I) -~
C'"
3
"C -
-.....! ........
0
-.....! 0 a,
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
-.....! 0
0>
-.....! 0
~
-.....! 0
"'
-.....! 0
0
(j) co
(X)
(j) co
0>
(j) co ~
(j) co "' l------1------!----l----4---+-----1f----+---+----t-12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
L_ _ _.J. __ _j_ __ ....J.._ __ L_ _ _J.. __ __J_ __ ..J.._ __ ~,__.......J_ 11/22/13
-I :e z I (11
~ ..... CD ..,
r CD < CD
0 < CD ..,
::t
3 CD -i=
C'"
3
"'C -
£~/90/90
Z~/B ~/0 ~
-c.
E Z~/~0/vO
.c
~ -Cl)
E t= ~ ~~v~t6o
'-Cl) > 0
Cl) > Cl) ~ ~19ZIZO ...J
'-Cl) ...,
~
<D I 0 ~10 ~/90 z
3: 1-
0~/ZZHO
60/90/LO
£ ~/90/90
l ~/B ~/0 ~
-Q.
E l~HO/vO
.c
= -(I)
E
i= ~ ~~v~t6o .... (I) > 0
(I) > (I) ~ ~/9lll0 ...J .... (I) ...,
~
......
I 0 ~10 ~lBO z ~ 1-
0~/llHO
60190/LO
BO/B ~ll ~
0
cri co
~
~.
0
ex) co
~
~~
\
(
•
\
~
1\ ""' ....
0
ex)
(J)
0> 0'1
6
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
0> 0
6
0'1 0'1
0
0'1 0
0
~ 0'1
0
~ 0 6
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
-1 :e
08/10/10 z I co
~ ~ (I) ..,
02/26/11 r (I) < (I)
0 < (I) ..,
09/1 4/11 :j
3
(I) -~
C'"
04/01/12 3
"'C -
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
0> 0> 6
0> 0'1
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
0> .to.
0
0> (J.)
0
0> I\.)
6
0> ~
6
0> 0
0
0'1 <0
6
r-----+----i-----1----+----+----+----+-12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
.__----'----..J------L-----1----..1..-.-----L.---....L 11/22/13
~ ~ z
I U)
~ ~ m
~
r m < m
0 < m ~
~ 3 m
~ ~
~
3
~ ~
(X)
V)
6
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
(X) N
01
(X) N 6
(X) (X)
~ ~
01 6
(X)
0 i:.n
!------+------+-----+------+------+ 12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
~....-, ____ .~....--____ ..~....-____ ...~...... ____ ...J...-____ .....l-11/22/13
-I :e z
I ~
0
iE ...... CD ....
r CD < CD
0 < CD ....
~
3
CD -~
C"
3
"'C -
-c.
E
.c
= -Cl)
E
i= ....
Cl) > 0
Cl) > Cl)
...J ....
Cl) .... ~
"""" """" I z s: 1-
£~/90/90
Z ~/B ~/0 ~
Z~H0/170
~~tv ~/60
~ ~/92:/ZO
0 ~10 ~lBO
0~/ZZHO
0
0> <0
1.0
0> <0
~ 01
0
~ 0
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
w 01
0
w
0 6
N
01
0
N
0
0
~
01
0
~
9
0
~
0
0
6
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
~ z I ~
1\)
~ A) ..... (I) ..,
r (I) < (I)
0 < (I) ..,
::!
3
(I) -~
C'"
3
"'C -
£ ~190190
l ~IS ~10 ~
-a.
E
.c
= l~HOivO -Cl)
E
i= ...
Cl) > 0 ~ ~lv ~160
Cl) > Cl)
...J ...
Cl) ..,
~ ~ ~19lll0
M
"""'" I z 3: .....
0 ~10 ~ISO
O~lllHO
-c.
E
.c
= -(I)
E
i= ....
(I) > 0
(I) > (I)
...J ....
(I) .... ~
~
~ I z ~ 1-
£ ~190190
l ~IS ~10 ~
l~HOivO
~ ~lv ~160
~ ~19lll0
0 ~10 ~ISO
O~lllHO
0 N (.()
<.0 ~
0
.,
~
<.0 N
0
~
~~
I 1
~
~
~~
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
<.0 9 0
00 00
0
00 ?> 0
00 ~ 0
.. ""'
00 N 6
00 0
0
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
11/22/13
~ z
I ~
(11
~ ,..
CD .,
r CD < CD
0 < CD .,
::t
3
CD -= C"'
3
"'C -
~ ~ 01
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
~ co
0
~ ~
01
~ (X)
6
~ --..1
01
~ --..1
6
1-------11--------+------+-----+-----t 07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
1...------.J~-----.L-------l.-------I..------L 11/22/13
-I ~ z
I
~ en
~ .... (I) ..,
r (I) < (I)
0 < (I) ..,
::t
3 (I) -~
C'"
3
"C -
-c.
E
.c = -Cl)
E
i= ....
Cl) > 0
Cl) > Cl)
..J ....
Cl) ...,
s:
to-
"""" I z
3: 1-
£ ~/90/90
l ~/B ~/0 ~
l~HO/vO
~ ~~v~t6o
~ ~/9l/l0
0 ~10 ~lBO
0~/llHO
0
('I)
('I)
LO
..0 ('I)
-c.
E
.c = -Cl)
E
j::
a...
Cl) > 0
Cl) > Cl)
...J
a...
Cl) ... ~
co
~ I z ~ 1-
£~/90/90
Z~/B ~/0 ~
l~HO/vO
~ ~~v~t6o
~ ~/9Z/ZO
0 ~10 ~lBO
0~/ZZHO
60190/LO
0
0
0
c)
0
c)
N
0
0 ('I)
~
~
~
.
~
~~
~~
--------
~~
~ ~ ~~
0
0 ""¢
~~
~
v·
r-----.
0
c)
10
0
c) co
0'1 0'1
<:.n
0'1 0'1
0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
0'1 ~
<:.n
0'1 ~
0
0'1 (...)
0'1
0'1 (...)
0
0'1 N
0'1
0'1 N
0
1-----+-----+-------+----+----+-----+----+-07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
..__ __ --'-----J...----..1....---..1------1----..L..------L 11/22/13
-I :e z
I ~
CD :e Q) ..... CD ..,
r CD < CD
0 < CD ..,
::t
3
CD -~
C'"
3
"'C -
1--'
0 0 \0 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
00 0 -.l 0 0\ 0 Vl 0 ~ 0
08/23/02
12/01/02
03/11/03
06/19/03
09/27/03
01/05/04
04114/04
07/23/04
10/31104
02/08/05
05119105
08/27/05 ~
12/05/05 ~ ~
03115/06 I ~ \C 06/23/06 ~ 10/01/06 ~
01109/07 ~ "'1
04/19/07 ~
07/28/07 ~ ~ ~
11105/07 =-
02113/08 0 ~
05/23/08 ~ "'1
08/31108 ~ -· 12/09/08 a ~ 03119/09 ,.-._
06/27/09 ?
10/05/09 -a-~
01113110 a ~
04/23110 '-'
08/01110
11109110
02117111
05/28/11
09/05111
12114111
03/23/12
07/01112
10/09112
01117113
04/27/13
08/05/13
11113/13
0'\ ~ 0'\ N
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
0'\ 0 Ul
00
Ul
0'\
Ul ~ Ul N
07/29/05
09/17/05
11/06/05
12/26/05
02114/06
04/05/06
05/25/06
07114/06
09/02/06
10/22/06
12111106
01/30/07
03/21107
05110/07
06/29/07
08118/07
10/07/07 ;-.3
11/26/07 ~ 01115/08 .&;;.
03/05/08 I N
04/24/08 1--6
06/13/08 ~ 08/02/08
09/21/08 ~ ~
11110/08 ~
12/30/08 0
02/18/09 ~ ~ 04/09/09 ~
05/29/09 =-
07118/09 0
09/06/09 ~ ~
10/26/09 ~
12115/09 ;-.3 -· 02/03110 a 03/25110 ~
05114110 ~
07/03/10 ?
08/22/10 0'"
10/11/10 ~ a 11130/10 ~ 01119/11 '-'
03/10/11
04/29/11
06/18/11
08/07/11
09/26111
11115111
01/04112
02/23112
04113112
06/02112
07/22112
09110112
10/30112
12119112
02/07113
03/29113
05118113
07/07113
08/26113
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
VI VI VI VI VI VI VI VI \0 00 -....) 0\ VI ..j::::.. w N
07/29/05
09/17/05
11106/05
12/26/05
02/14/06
04/05/06
05/25/06
07/14/06
09/02/06
10/22/06
12111106
01130/07
03/21107
05/10/07
06/29/07
08/18/07
10/07/07 ~
11126/07 ~ 01115/08 ~
03/05/08 I N
04/24/08 N
06113/08 ~ 08/02/08
09/21/08 l""'f'. ~
11110/08 .,
12/30/08 ~
02118/09 ~ "'C 04/09/09 l""'f'.
05/29/09 =-
07118/09 0
09/06/09 ~ ~
10/26/09 .,
12115/09 ~
02/03/10 .... a 03/25/10 ~
05/14/10 ~
07/03/10 ~
08/22/10 0"'
10/11/10 -a 11130110 "'C 01119/11 ._,
03110/11
04/29/11
06/18/11
08/07/11
09/26/11
11/15/11
01104/12
02/23/12
04113/12
06/02/12
07/22/12
09/10/12
10/30/12
12119/12
02/07/13
03/29/13
05118/13
07/07/13
08/26/13
)
0\ N
0
0\
"'""" 0
0\ 0 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
Vl \0 0
Vl
00 0
Vl -......]
0
Vl 0\ 0
Vl
Vl 0
Vl ~ 0
09/13/07
11/02/07
12/22/07
02110/08
03/31108
05/20/08
07/09/08
08/28/08
10117/08
12/06/08
01125/09
03/16/09 ~ 05/05/09 ~ 06/24/09 ...
I
08/13/09 N ...
10/02/09 ~ 11121109 .....
01110/10 ~ ....
03/01110 ~
04/20110 ~
"'C
06/09/10 ..... =-
07/29110 0
09/17110 -< ~ ....
11106/10 ~
12/26/10 ... a
02114111 ~ ..-_
04/05/11 ~
05/25111 0"' -07114111 a
09/02111 "'C ._,
10/22/11
12/11/11
01130/12
03/20112
05/09/12
06/28112
08117/12
10/06/12
11125/12
01114113
03/05/13
04/24113
06/13/13
08/02/13
-.]
0 0'1 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
Vl 0 ~ 0 w 0 tv 0
.,_..
0 0
09113/07
11102/07
12/22/07
02/10/08
03/31108
05/20/08
07/09/08
08/28/08
10/17/08
12/06/08
01125/09
03/16/09 ~ 05/05/09 ~ 06/24/09 .&;;. I
08/13/09 N VI
10/02/09 ~ 11121109 "'* 01110110 ~ .,
03/01110 0
04/20/10 ~ "'C
06/09110 "'* =-
07/29110 0
09117110 < ~ .,
11106110 ~
12/26110 ...
9
02114111 ~
~
04/05111 ~
05/25/11 -a--07114111 9
09/02111 "'C ._,
10/22111
12111111
01130/12
03/20112
05/09/12
06/28112
08117112
10/06/12
11125112
01114113
03/05/13
04/24113
06/13/13
08/02/13
...-.. c.
E
.c . ..,
~ .__...
(I)
E
i=
'-(I) > 0 -(I) > (I)
..J
'-(I) .., ca 3:
0 M I 3: ~
G ~/~0/vO
0 ~/8 ~/ ~ ~
60/90/LO
80/GG/GO
90/0 ~/0 ~
0
LO I"--
0
c.o I"--
LO
c.o I"--
0
co I"--
LO
co I"--
0
0 co
..-... c.
E -.c . ... ~ .__..
Q)
E
i=
"-Q) > 0 -Q) > Q)
..J
"-Q) ... ca ~ ,....
CW)
I ~
:E
s ~~v~IBO
c ~/~0/vO
0 ~/B ~/ ~ ~
60/90/LO
80/GG/GO
90/0 ~/0 ~
SO/Be/SO
0
(() c.o
\
~
~
0
co c.o
~
~
~
~
I ~·
0
0 ,......
...
~~
~
0
C\J ,......
.....
~ ~
~
0
c.o ,......
0
co ,......
0
c) co
0
C\J co
TabF
Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-1
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,646.96 5,648.09 1.13 112.5
5,600.38 02/06/09 47.71 46.58
5,599.99 07/21/09 48.10 46.97
5,600.26 09/21/09 47.83 46.70
5,601.10 10/28/09 46.99 45.86
5,602.59 12/14/09 45.50 44.37
5,600.55 03/11/10 47.54 46.41
5,600.66 05/11/10 47.43 46.30
5,599.18 09/29/10 48.91 47.78
5,598.92 12/21/10 49.17 48.04
5,598.29 02/28/11 49.80 48.67
5,597.80 06/21111 50.29 49.16
5,597.32 09/20/11 50.77 49.64
5,597.15 12/21/11 50.94 49.81
5,596.54 03/27/12 51.55 50.42
5,596.52 06/28/12 51.57 50.44
5,595.03 09/27/12 53.06 51.93
5,596.62 12/28112 51.47 50.34
5,593.54 03/28/13 54.55 53.42
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-2
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,625.75 5,626.69 0.94 95
5,611.37 02/06/09 15.32 14.38
5,610.63 07/21/09 16.06 15.12
5,609.73 09/21/09 16.96 16.02
5,607.08 11/02/09 19.61 18.67
5,606.57 12114/09 20.12 19.18
5,612.45 03111/10 14.24 13.30
5,612.78 05/11/10 13.91 12.97
5,611.37 09/29110 15.32 14.38
5,610.24 12/21/10 16.45 15.51
5,610.64 02/28/11 16.05 15.11
5,609.78 06/21111 16.91 15.97
5609.79 09/20111 16.90 15.96
5609.72 12/21111 16.97 16.03
5,605.69 03/27112 21.00 20.06
5,605.67 06/28112 21.02 20.08
5,603.03 09/27/12 23.66 22.72
5,605.76 12/28112 20.93 19.99
5,598.28 03/28/13 28.41 27.47
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-3
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,633.64 5,634.50 0.86 110
5,603.77 02/06/09 30.73 29.87
5,602.37 07/21/09 32.13 31.27
5,602.34 09/21/09 32.16 31.30
5,602.60 10/28/09 31.90 31.04
5,603.12 12114/09 31.38 30.52
5,602.90 03/11/10 31.60 30.74
5,603.23 05/11/10 31.27 30.41
5,602.86 09/29110 31.64 30.78
5,603.35 12/21110 31.15 30.29
5,602.89 02/28111 31.61 30.75
5,602.75 06/21111 31.75 30.89
5,602.40 09/20111 32.10 31.24
5,602.40 12/21/11 32.10 31.24
5,601.70 03/27112 32.80 31.94
5,601.67 06/28112 32.83 31.97
5,600.50 09/27112 34.00 33.14
5,601.74 12/28112 32.76 31.90
5,598.60 03/28/13 35.90 35.04
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-4
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,641.04 5,641.87 0.83 136
5,601.47 02/06/09 40.40 39.57
5,604.26 07/21109 37.61 36.78
5,605.02 09/21109 36.85 36.02
5,605.87 10/28/09 36.00 35.17
5,605.81 12/14/09 36.06 35.23
5,605.31 03/11110 36.56 35.73
5,605.36 05/11/10 36.51 35.68
5,604.59 09/29/10 37.28 36.45
5,604.42 12/21110 37.45 36.62
5,603.69 02/28111 38.18 37.35
5,603.36 06/21111 38.51 37.68
5,602.82 09/20111 39.05 38.22
5,602.79 12/21111 39.08 38.25
5,600.82 03/27112 41.05 40.22
5,600.84 06/28112 41.03 40.20
5,598.47 09/27/12 43.40 42.57
5,600.86 12/28/12 41.01 40.18
5,595.57 03/28/13 46.30 45.47
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-5
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,653.70 5,655.18 1.48 155
5,584.43 08/25/09 70.75 69.27
5,584.51 09/21109 70.67 69.19
5,584.54 11/10/09 70.64 69.16
5,584.62 12114/09 70.56 69.08
5,584.97 03/11110 70.21 68.73
5,585.38 05/11110 69.80 68.32
5,585.35 09/29/10 69.83 68.35
5,585.42 12/21110 69.76 68.28
5,585.08 02/28/11 70.10 68.62
5,585.38 06/21111 69.80 68.32
5,585.51 09/20/11 69.67 68.19
5,585.76 12/21111 69.42 67.94
5,585.61 03/27/12 69.57 68.09
5,585.63 06/28/12 69.55 68.07
5,585.63 09/27/12 69.55 68.07
5,585.90 12/28112 69.28 67.80
5,585.68 03/28/13 69.50 68.02
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-6
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,663.03 5,664.94 1.91 135
5,589.52 08/25/09 75.42 73.51
5,589.46 09/22/09 75.48 73.57
5,589.61 11/03/09 75.33 73.42
5,589.92 12114/09 75.02 73.11
5,590.24 03/11/10 74.70 72.79
5,590.40 05111110 74.54 72.63
5,590.24 09/29110 74.70 72.79
5,590.49 12/21/10 74.45 72.54
5,590.16 02/28111 74.78 72.87
5,590.44 06/21/11 74.50 72.59
5,590.35 09/20111 74.59 72.68
5,590.67 12/21111 74.27 72.36
5,590.34 03/27/12 74.60 72.69
5,590.32 06/28112 74.62 72.71
5,589.77 09/27112 75.17 73.26
5,589.67 12/28112 75.27 73.36
5,589.45 03/28/13 75.49 73.58
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-7
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.39 5,649.26 1.87 120
5,552.56 08/25/09 96.70 94.83
5,558.34 09/21/09 90.92 89.05
5,558.82 11110/09 90.44 88.57
5,558.96 12/14/09 90.30 88.43
5,559.54 03111/10 89.72 87.85
5,559.60 05111/10 89.66 87.79
5,559.83 09/29110 89.43 87.56
5,559.00 12/21/10 90.26 88.39
5,559.68 02/28111 89.58 87.71
5,560.43 06/21111 88.83 86.96
5,560.46 09/20111 88.80 86.93
5,560.78 12/21/11 88.48 86.61
5,560.92 03/27112 88.34 86.47
5,560.87 06/28112 88.39 86.52
5,561.40 09/27112 87.86 85.99
5,561.50 12/28112 87.76 85.89
5,562.01 03/28113 87.25 85.38
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-8
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,649.35 5,651.48 2.13 160
5,589.01 08/25/09 62.47 60.34
5,589.10 09/21/09 62.38 60.25
5,589.09 11103/09 62.39 60.26
5,603.38 12/14/09 48.10 45.97
5,589.68 03/11110 61.80 59.67
5,589.95 05/11/10 61.53 59.40
5,589.74 09/29/10 61.74 59.61
5,589.97 12/21/10 61.51 59.38
5,589.67 02/28111 61.81 59.68
5,589.96 06/21111 61.52 59.39
5,589.82 09/20111 61.66 59.53
5,590.18 12/21/11 61.30 59.17
5,589.85 03/27112 61.63 59.50
5,589.84 06/28112 61.64 59.51
5,589.28 09/27/12 62.20 60.07
5,589.18 12/28112 62.30 60.17
5,588.95 03/28/13 62.53 60.40
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-9
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,645.68 5,647.45 1.77 102.5
5,582.05 08/25/09 65.40 63.63
5,582.12 09/22/09 65.33 63.56
5,582.27 11110/09 65.18 63.41
5,582.53 12/14/09 64.92 63.15
5,582.92 03/11/10 64.53 62.76
5,583.06 05/11110 64.39 62.62
5,583.25 09/29/10 64.20 62.43
5,583.57 12/21110 63.88 62.11
5,583.54 02/28/11 63.91 62.14
5,583.92 06/21111 63.53 61.76
5,584.04 09/20111 63.41 61.64
5,587.42 12/21111 60.03 58.26
5,584.56 03/27112 62.89 61.12
5,584.55 06/28/12 62.90 61.13
5,584.85 09/27112 62.6 60.83
5,585.24 12/28112 62.21 60.44
5,585.35 03/28/13 62.10 60.33
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-10
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,664.63 5,666.98 2.35 107.5
5,584.18 08/25/09 82.80 80.45
5,584.40 09/22/09 82.58 80.23
5,584.61 11/10/09 82.37 80.02
5,584.90 12/14/09 82.08 79.73
5,585.21 03/11/10 81.77 79.42
5,585.42 05/11/10 81.56 79.21
5,585.42 09/29/10 81.56 79.21
5,585.68 12/21110 81.30 78.95
5,585.60 02/28111 81.38 79.03
5,585.95 06/21/11 81.03 78.68
5,585.92 09/20/11 81.06 78.71
5,586.22 12/21/11 80.76 78.41
5,586.16 03/27/12 80.82 78.47
5,586.16 06/28112 80.82 78.47
5,586.13 09/27/12 80.85 78.50
5,586.28 12/28/12 80.70 78.35
5,586.28 03/28/13 80.70 78.35
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -11
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,683.16 5,684.53 1.37 147.5
5,613.00 11103/09 71.53 70.16
5,613.88 12/14/09 70.65 69.28
5,614.65 03/11110 69.88 68.51
5,615.16 05/11/10 69.37 68.00
5,614.93 09/29/10 69.60 68.23
5,615.09 12/21/10 69.44 68.07
5,614.96 02/28/11 69.57 68.20
5,615.12 06/21111 69.41 68.04
5,614.96 09/20/11 69.57 68.20
5,615.18 12/21111 69.35 67.98
5,615.11 03/27/12 69.42 68.05
5,615.12 06/28/12 69.41 68.04
5,615.03 09/27112 69.50 68.13
5,615.28 12/28/12 69.25 67.88
5,615.40 03/28/13 69.13 67.76
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-12
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,667.03 5,668.24 1.21 115
5,628.33 11/03/09 39.91 38.70
5,628.86 12114/09 39.38 38.17
5,630.27 03/11/10 37.97 36.76
5,631.64 05111/10 36.60 35.39
5,633.73 09/29110 34.51 33.30
5,633.43 12/21/10 34.81 33.60
5,634.35 02/28111 33.89 32.68
5,635:95 06/21/11 32.29 31.08
5,636.44 09/20111 31.80 30.59
5,638.93 12/21111 29.31 28.10
5,639.69 03/27/12 28.55 27.34
5,639.74 06/28112 28.50 27.29
5,640.90 09/27112 27.34 26.13
5,640.52 12/28/12 27.72 26.51
5,639.99 03/28113 28.25 27.04
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-13
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,633.04 5,634.32 1.28 120
5,586.95 11/03/09 47.37 46.09
5,587.22 12114/09 47.10 45.82
5,587.45 03111110 46.87 45.59
5,587.64 05111110 46.68 45.40
5,587.37 09/29/10 46.95 45.67
5,587.77 12/21110 46.55 45.27
5,587.64 02/28/11 46.68 45.40
5,587.89 06/21111 46.43 45.15
5,588.03 09/20111 46.29 45.01
5,588.30 12/21111 46.02 44.74
5,588.32 03/27112 46.00 44.72
5,588.30 06/28112 46.02 44.74
5,588.51 09/27112 45.81 44.53
5,588.71 12/28112 45.61 44.33
5,588.87 03/28113 45.45 44.17
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-14
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.80 5,649.53 1.73 135
5,586.18 11104/09 63.35 61.62
5,586.51 12114/09 63.02 61.29
5,586.71 03/11110 62.82 61.09
5,586.72 05111110 62.81 61.08
5,586.53 09/29110 63.00 61.27
5,586.80 12/21110 62.73 61.00
5,586.74 02/28111 62.79 61.06
5,586.84 06/21111 62.69 60.96
5,586.73 09/20111 62.80 61.07
5,586.98 12/21111 62.55 60.82
5,587.07 03/27112 62.46 60.73
5,587.10 06/28112 62.43 60.70
5,587.07 09/27112 62.46 60.73
5,587.33 12/28112 62.20 60.47
5,587.43 03/28113 62.10 60.37
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-15
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,675.01 5,676.49 1.48 155
5,594.12 11/10/09 82.37 80.89
5,584.03 12114/09 92.46 90.98
5,584.10 03/11110 92.39 90.91
5,584.16 05/11110 92.33 90.85
5,584.26 09/29/10 92.23 90.75
5,584.30 12/21110 92.19 90.71
5,584.04 02/28111 92.45 90.97
5,584.30 06/21111 92.19 90.71
5,584.37 09/20111 92.12 90.64
5,584.49 12/21111 92.00 90.52
5,584.47 03/27112 92.02 90.54
5,584.49 06/28112 92.00 90.52
5,584.58 09/27/12 91.91 90.43
5,584.75 12/28112 91.74 90.26
5,584.93 03/28/13 91.56 90.08
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -16
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,651.07 5,652.70 1.63 100
5,603.34 11/04/09 49.36 47.73
5,603.56 12/14/09 49.14 47.51
5,603.84 03/11/10 48.86 47.23
5,604.31 05/11/10 48.39 46.76
5,604.28 09/29110 48.42 46.79
5,604.39 12/21/10 48.31 46.68
5,604.20 02/28111 48.50 46.87
5,604.55 06/21/11 48.15 46.52
5,604.74 09/20/11 47.96 46.33
5,604.94 12/21111 47.76 46.13
5,604.84 03/27/12 47.86 46.23
5,604.85 06/28112 47.85 46.22
5,604.99 09/27112 47.71 46.08
5,605.10 12/28/12 47.60 45.97
5,605.22 03/28113 47.48 45.85
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -17
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,639.73 5,641.55 1.82 100
5,605.96 11104/09 35.59 33.77
5,606.27 12/14/09 35.28 33.46
5,606.25 03/11110 35.30 33.48
5,606.55 05/11110 35.00 33.18
5,606.77 09/29/10 34.78 32.96
5,607.15 12/21110 34.40 32.58
5,606.96 02/28111 34.59 32.77
5,607.22 06/21/11 34.33 32.51
5,607.40 09/20111 34.15 32.33
5,607.85 12/21111 33.70 31.88
5,607.67 03/27/12 33.88 32.06
5,607.68 06/28112 33.87 32.05
5,607.76 09/27/12 33.79 31.97
5,608.08 12/28/12 33.47 31.65
5,607.91 03/28/13 33.64 31.82
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN -18
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,643.95 5,645.45 1.50 100
5,586.85 11102/09 58.60 57.10
5,600.14 12/14/09 45.31 43.81
5,587.36 03/11110 58.09 56.59
5,587.71 05/11110 57.74 56.24
5,587.50 09/29/10 57.95 56.45
5,607.66 12/21/10 37.79 36.29
5,587.35 02/28/11 58.10 56.60
5,587.71 06/21111 57.74 56.24
5,587.65 09/20/11 57.80 56.30
5,587.95 12/21111 57.50 56.00
5,587.05 03/27112 58.40 56.90
5,587.05 06/28/12 58.40 56.90
5,587.50 09/27112 57.95 56.45
5,587.50 12/28/12 57.95 56.45
5,587.32 03/28/13 58.13 56.63
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-19
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,659.59 5,661.36 1.77 110
5,606.17 11102/09 55.19 53.42
5,606.70 12114/09 54.66 52.89
5,607.22 03111110 54.14 52.37
5,607.89 05/11110 53.47 51.70
5,607.98 09/29110 53.38 51.61
5,608.41 12/21110 52.95 51.18
5,608.49 02/28111 52.87 51.10
5,608.60 06/21/11 52.76 50.99
5,609.17 09/20111 52.19 50.42
5,608.90 12/21111 52.46 50.69
5,608.87 03/27/12 52.49 50.72
5,608.86 06/28112 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 09/27112 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 12/28/12 52.50 50.73
5,609.17 03/28/13 52.19 50.42
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TW 4-19
Total or
Measuring Measured
Water Land Point Depth to Total Depth
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water to Water Total Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,629.53 5,631.39 1.86 121.33
5,581.88 08/23/02 49.51 47.65
5,582.14 09111/02 49.25 47.39
5,582.06 10/23/02 49.33 47.47
5,582.07 11122/02 49.32 47.46
5,582.16 12/03/02 49.23 47.37
5,582.28 01/09/03 49.11 47.25
5,582.29 02/21103 49.10 47.24
5,582.74 03/26/03 48.65 46.79
5,582.82 04/02/03 48.57 46.71
5,548.47 05/01/03 82.92 81.06
5,564.76 06/09/03 66.63 64.77
5,562.53 07/07/03 68.86 67.00
5,564.10 08/04/03 67.29 65.43
5,566.01 08/30/04 65.38 63.52
5,555.16 09/16/04 76.23 74.37
5,549.80 10/11104 81.59 79.73
5,546.04 11116/04 85.35 83.49
5,547.34 12/22/04 84.05 82.19
5,548.77 01/18/05 82.62 80.76
5,551.18 02/28/05 80.21 78.35
5,556.81 03115/05 74.58 72.72
5,562.63 04/26/05 68.76 66.90
5,573.42 05/24/05 57.97 56.11
5,552.94 07/29/05 78.45 76.59
5,554.00 09112/05 77.39 75.53
5,555.98 12/07/05 75.41 73.55
5,552.00 03/08/06 79.39 77.53
5,545.74 06/13/06 85.65 83.79
5,544.06 07/18/06 87.33 85.47
5,548.81 11/07/06 82.58 80.72
5543.59 02/27/07 87.80 85.94
5544.55 05/02/07 86.84 84.98
5558.97 08/15/07 72.42 70.56
5559.73 10/10/07 71.66 69.8
5569.26 03/26/08 62.13 60.27
5535.47 06/25/08 95.92 94.06
5541.41 08/26/08 89.98 88.12
5558.45 10/14/08 72.94 71.08
5536.9 03/03/09 94.49 92.63
5547.76 06/24/09 83.63 81.77
5561.48 09/10/09 69.91 68.05
5548.14 12/11109 83.25 81.39
5,570.58 03111/10 60.81 58.95
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TW 4-19
Total or
Measuring Measured
Water Land Point Depth to Total Depth
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water to Water Total Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,629.53 5,631.39 1.86 121.33
5,561.35 05/11110 70.04 68.18
5,535.26 09129110 96.13 94.27
5,568.40 12/21/10 62.99 61.13
5,550.36 02/28111 81.03 79.17
5,570.41 06/21111 60.98 59.12
5,567.84 09/20111 63.55 61.69
5,571.32 12/21/11 60.07 58.21
5,572.40 03/27112 58.99 57.13
5,572.39 06/28/12 59.00 57.14
5,571.40 09/27112 59.99 58.13
5,568.21 12/28/12 63.18 61.32
5,572.51 03/28/13 58.88 57.02
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TW4-21
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,638.20 5,639.35 1.15 120.92
5,582.98 07/29/05 56.37 55.22
5,583.43 08/30/05 55.92 54.77
5,581.87 09112/05 57.48 56.33
5,580.50 12/07/05 58.85 57.70
5,583.64 03/08/06 55.71 54.56
5,580.55 06113/06 58.80 57.65
5,578.95 07118/06 60.40 59.25
5,578.47 11107/06 60.88 59.73
5,579.53 02/27/07 59.82 58.67
5,578.07 05/02/07 61.28 60.13
5,583.41 08115/07 55.94 54.79
5,583.45 10110/07 55.90 54.75
5,586.47 03/26/08 52.88 51.73
5,579.16 06/24/08 60.19 59.04
5,579.92 08/26/08 59.43 58.28
5,577.37 10114/08 61.98 60.83
5,578.00 03110/09 61.35 60.20
5,580.14 06/24/09 59.21 58.06
5,578.72 09/10/09 60.63 59.48
5,579.99 12111109 59.36 58.21
5,582.81 03111110 56.54 55.39
5,582.23 05111110 57.12 55.97
5,576.60 09/29110 62.75 61.60
5,581.14 12/21110 58.21 57.06
5,579.53 02/28/11 59.82 58.67
5,584.17 06/21111 55.18 54.03
5,584.80 09/20111 54.55 53.40
5,585.68 12/21111 53.67 52.52
5,585.24 03/27/12 54.11 52.96
5,585.26 06/28/12 54.09 52.94
5,585.16 09/27/12 54.19 53.04
5,585.25 12/28112 54.10 52.95
5,582.84 03/28113 56.51 55.36
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TW 4-22
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,627.83 5,629.00 1.17 113.5
5,571.89 07/29/05 57.11 55.94
5,572.20 08/30/05 56.80 55.63
5,572.08 09112/05 56.92 55.75
5,571.61 12/07/05 57.39 56.22
5,571.85 03/08/06 57.15 55.98
5,571.62 06113/06 57.38 56.21
5,571.42 07/18/06 57.58 56.41
5,571.02 11/07/06 57.98 56.81
5571.24 02/27/07 57.76 56.59
5,570.75 06/29/07 58.25 57.08
5,571.82 08/14/07 57.18 56.01
5,571.99 10110/07 57.01 55.84
5,573.05 03/26/08 55.95 54.78
5,573.04 06/24/08 55.96 54.79
5,573.04 08/26/08 55.96 54.79
5,573.02 10114/08 55.98 54.81
5,573.19 03110/09 55.81 54.64
5,573.32 06/24/09 55.68 54.51
5,573.17 09/10/09 55.83 54.66
5,573.52 12111/09 55.48 54.31
5,573.88 03/11/10 55.12 53.95
5,574.29 05111/10 54.71 53.54
5,574.88 09/29/10 54.12 52.95
5,574.44 12/21/10 54.56 53.39
5,574.49 02/28/11 54.51 53.34
5,574.97 06/21111 54.03 52.86
5,575.06 09/20/11 53.94 52.77
5,575.69 12/21111 53.31 52.14
5,575.61 03/27/12 53.39 52.22
5,575.62 06/28/12 53.38 52.21
5,575.90 09/27/12 53.10 51.93
5,575.59 12/28/12 53.41 52.24
5,573.50 03/28/13 55.50 54.33
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TW 4-24
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,625.70 5,627.83 2.13 113.5
5,570.61 09/13/07 57.22 55.09
5,570.53 10/10/07 57.30 55.17
5,571.16 11130/07 56.67 54.54
5,571.30 12111107 56.53 54.40
5,571.03 01108/08 56.80 54.67
5,571.22 02118/08 56.61 54.48
5,571.43 03/26/08 56.40 54.27
5,571.68 04/23/08 56.15 54.02
5571.52 05/30/08 56.31 54.18
5,571.34 06/24/08 56.49 54.36
5,571.28 07116/08 56.55 54.42
5,571.34 08/26/08 56.49 54.36
5,571.23 09/10/08 56.60 54.47
5,571.12 10/14/08 56.71 54.58
5,570.95 11126/08 56.88 54.75
5,570.92 12/29/08 56.91 54.78
5,571.65 01/26/09 56.18 54.05
5,571.31 02/24/09 56.52 54.39
5,571.37 03/06/09 56.46 54.33
5,571.21 04/07/09 56.62 54.49
5,571.23 05/29/09 56.60 54.47
5,571.42 06/30/09 56.41 54.28
5,571.38 07/31109 56.45 54.32
5,571.48 08/31109 56.35 54.22
5,571.28 09110/09 56.55 54.42
5,571.64 12/11109 56.19 54.06
5,571.86 03111110 55.97 53.84
5,571.91 05111110 55.92 53.79
5,572.18 09/29110 55.65 53.52
5,571.86 12/21110 55.97 53.84
5,571.78 02/28/11 56.05 53.92
5,572.40 06/21111 55.43 53.30
5,572.19 09/20/11 55.64 53.51
5,573.02 12/21111 54.81 52.68
5,573.03 03/27112 54.80 52.67
5,573.02 06/28/12 54.81 52.68
5,573.13 09/27112 54.70 52.57
5,573.05 12/28/12 54.78 52.65
5,566.53 03/28/13 61.30 59.17
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TW 4-25
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,627.83 5,644.91 17.08 134.8
5,601.86 09/13/07 43.05 25.97
5,601.89 10/10/07 43.02 25.94
5,602.57 11/30/07 42.34 25.26
5,602.82 12111/07 42.09 25.01
5,601.94 01/08/08 42.97 25.89
5,599.13 02118/08 45.78 28.70
5,597.11 03/26/08 47.80 30.72
5,595.51 04/23/08 49.40 32.32
5594.42 05/30/08 50.49 33.41
5,594.26 06/24/08 50.65 33.57
5,586.67 07116/08 58.24 41.16
5,594.17 08/26/08 50.74 33.66
5,594.23 09110/08 50.68 33.60
5,594.12 10114/08 50.79 33.71
5,594.06 11/26/08 50.85 33.77
5,594.87 12/29/08 50.04 32.96
5,595.89 01/26/09 49.02 31.94
5,596.27 02/24/09 48.64 31.56
5,596.47 03/06/09 48.44 31.36
5,596.74 04/07/09 48.17 31.09
5,597.55 05/29/09 47.36 30.28
5,598.11 06/30/09 46.80 29.72
5,598.22 07/31109 46.69 29.61
5,598.52 08/31109 46.39 29.31
5,598.49 09/10/09 46.42 29.34
5,599.48 12/11109 45.43 28.35
5,599.75 03111110 45.16 28.08
5,599.63 05111110 45.28 28.20
5,598.68 09/29110 46.23 29.15
5,598.66 12/21110 46.25 29.17
5,598.18 02/28111 46.73 29.65
5,598.61 06/21111 46.30 29.22
5,598.08 09/20111 46.83 29.75
5,598.23 12/21111 46.68 29.60
5,597.41 03/27112 47.50 30.42
5,597.41 06/28/12 47.50 30.42
5,595.60 09/27112 49.31 32.23
5,597.41 12/28112 47.50 30.42
5,597.43 03/28/13 47.48 30.40
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well MW-30
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,613.34 5,614.50 1.16 110
5,534.92 10/24/2006 79.58 78.42
5,535.09 3/16/2007 79.41 78.25
5,535.46 8/27/2007 79.04 77.88
5,535.06 10115/2007 79.44 78.28
5,535.78 3/15/2008 78.72 77.56
5,536.26 6/15/2008 78.24 77.08
5,536.35 9/15/2008 78.15 76.99
5,536.68 11115/2008 77.82 76.66
5,535.42 3/15/2009 79.08 77.92
5,537.11 6/30/2009 77.39 76.23
5,536.93 911012009 77.57 76.41
5,537.23 12/1112009 77.27 76.11
5,537.59 3/11/2010 76.91 75.75
5,537.85 5111/2010 76.65 75.49
5,538.37 9/29/2010 76.13 74.97
5537.70 12/2112010 76.8 75.64
5537.67 2/28/2011 76.83 75.67
5538.31 6/21/2011 76.19 75.03
5538.15 9/20/2011 76.35 75.19
5538.42 12/2112011 76.08 74.92
5538.54 3/27/2012 75.96 74.8
5538.60 6/28/2012 75.9 74.74
5538.68 9/27/2012 75.82 74.66
5538.99 12/28/2012 75.51 74.35
5539.25 3/28/2013 75.25 74.09
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well MW-31
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,615.26 5,616.40 1.14 130
5,544.07 10/24/2006 72.33 71.19
5,544.45 3116/2007 71.95 70.81
5,536.94 8/27/2007 79.46 78.32
5,544.62 10/15/2007 71.78 70.64
5,545.37 3115/2008 71.03 69.89
5,544.50 6/15/2008 71.90 70.76
5,545.94 9115/2008 70.46 69.32
5,546.42 11115/2008 69.98 68.84
5,546.03 3115/2009 70.37 69.23
5,546.65 6/30/2009 69.75 68.61
5,546.45 9110/2009 69.95 68.81
5,546.75 12111/2009 69.65 68.51
5,547.09 311112010 69.31 68.17
5,547.41 511112010 68.99 67.85
5,547.28 9/29/2010 69.12 67.98
5547.45 12/2112010 68.95 67.81
5547.37 2/28/2011 69.03 67.89
5547.96 6/21/2011 68.44 67.3
5547.65 9/20/2011 68.75 67.61
5548.34 12/2112011 68.06 66.92
5548.30 3/27/2012 68.10 66.96
5548.40 6/28/2012 68.00 66.86
5548.59 9/27/2012 67.81 66.67
5548.91 12/28/2012 67.49 66.35
5549.14 3/28/2013 67.26 66.12
TabG
Laboratory Analytical Reports
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302338-010
Client Sample ID: Piez-01_02192013
Collection Date: 2/19/2013 1412h
Received Date: 2/22/2013 1110h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 2/27/2013 2124h E300.0 10.0 56.7
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L 2/22/2013 1455h E353.2 1.00 8.11
"-Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
1\
Report Date: 3/20/2013 Page 13 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of t~e name of this comP.any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c~nnection ~ith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale .of any product or pro_cess, orin connection with the re_-publication ?f ~is report for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302338-011
Client Sample ID: Piez-02_02192013
Collection Date: 2119/2013 1345h
Received Date: 2/22/2013 lllOh
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 2127/2013 2147h E3oo~o 1.00 9.67
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L 2/22/2013 1458h E353.2 0.100 0.218
1\-Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
1\
Report Date: 3/20/2013 Page 14 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use_ of the. name of this company or any member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in_ c~nnection ~ith the advertisement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or in connection with the re_-publication of ~is report for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
::-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
1302338-012
Client Sample ID: Piez-03_02192013
Collection Date: 2/19/2013 1400h
Received Date: 2/22/2013 lllOh
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2/27/2013 22llh E300.0 10.0
2/22/2013 1509h E353.2 0.200
Analytical
Result Qual
21.0
1.85
Report Date: 3/112013 Page 15 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use_ of t~e name of this coml?any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in_ c~nnection ~ith the !ldverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or in connection with the re_-publication of ~is report for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302338-002
Client Sample ID: TWN-01_02182013
Collection Date: 2/18/2013 1241h
Received Date: 2/22/2013 1110h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2/27/2013 1708h E300.0 10.0
2/22/2013 1436h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
17.6
0.681
Report Date: 3/1/2013 Page 5 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e name of this comj)any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in_ c?nnection V.:ith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or process, or in connection with the re_-publication of ~is report for any
American West ANA LYTIC AL LABORATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302338-001
Client Sample ID: TWN-01R_02182013
Collection Date: 2/18/2013 1218h
Received Date: 2/22/2013 111 Oh
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2/27/2013 1558h E300.0 1.00
2/22/2013 1435h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
< 1.00
< 0.100
Report Date: 3/112013 Page 4 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use_ of the name of this comj)any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in_ c?nnection ~th the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or in connection with the re_-publication of ~is report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302338-007
Client Sample JD: TWN-02_02192013
Collection Date: 2/19/2013 1 052h
Received Date: 2/22/2013 1110h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2/27/2013 195lh E300.0 10.0
2/22/2013 1450h E353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
80.5
57.3
Report Date: 3/112013 Page 10 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use_ of the name of this com]Jany or any member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in_ c?nnection with the advertisement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or p~o_cess, or in connection with the re_-publication of ~is _report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
:::-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302338-006
Client Sample ID: TWN-03_02192013
Collection Date: 2119/2013 1045h
Received Date: 2/22/2013 1110h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2/27/2013 1841h E300.0 100
2/22/2013 1449h E353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
157
22.2
Report Date: 3/1/2013 Page 9 of 19
All analyses applicable· to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in_ c~nnection ":'ith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or in connection with the re_-publication of ~is report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATOR I ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302338-004
Client Sample ID: TWN-04_02182013
Collection Date: 2/18/2013 1351h
Received Date: 2/22/2013 lllOh
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2/27/2013 1754h £300.0 10.0
2/22/2013 1439h £353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
25.3
1.51
Report Date: 3/1/2013 Page 7 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in_ c?nnection v,rith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale :of any product or·pro~ess, or in connection with the re_-publication of ~is report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
'altLake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302338-003
Client Sample ID: TWN-07 _02192013
Collection Date: 2119/2013 1025h
Received Date: 2/22/2013 lllOh
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg!L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2/27/2013 173lh E300.0 1.00
2/22/2013 1437h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
5.68
0.591
Report Date: 3/1/2013 Page 6 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this com)Jany or any member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in. c~nnection V:'ith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302338-005
Client Sample ID: TWN-18_02182013
Collection Date: 2/18/2013 1440h
Received Date: 2/22/2013 1110h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2/27/2013 1818h E300.0 10.0
2/22/2013 1440h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
68.7
2.27
Report Date: 3/1/2013 Page 8 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use_ of t~e name of this com)>any or any member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in_ c~nnection ~ith the adverti~ement,:promotion or sale of any product or pro_cess, or in connection ~ith the re_-publication of t~is report for any
American West ANALYTICA L LAB ORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
::-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302239-004
Client Sample ID: TW4-22_02112013
Collection Date: 2/11/2013 0926h
Received Date: 2/15/2013 IOOOh
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2119/2013 2325h E300.0 100
2115/2013 1603h E353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
635
58.0
Report Date: 2/26/2013 Page 10 of 58
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use_ of t~e name of this com)Jany or any member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in_ c?nnection Vl'ith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or in connection with the re_-publication of J:!lis report for any .
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
::-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302239-003
Client Sample ID: TW4-24_02112013
Collection Date: 2/11/2013 0910h
Received Date: 2115/2013 lOOOh
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2118/2013 2046h E300.0 100
2/15/2013 1525h E353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
1,260
35.9
Report Date: 2/26/2013 Page 9 of 58
All analyses applicable to. the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of t~e name of this comjlany or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in_ c?nnection ~ith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or_ in connection with the re_-publication of t?is report for any •.
American West ANA LYTICAL LABORAT O RIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
::-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302239-002
Client Sample ID: TW4-25 _02112013
Collection Date: 2/11/2013 0850h
Received Date: 2115/2013 1 OOOh
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2118/2013 2019h E300.0 100
2115/2013 1524h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
190
9.04
Report Date: 2/26/2013 Page 8 of 58
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of:
subsequent use_ of t~e name of this comjlany or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in_ C(>nnection \\'ith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or_ in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302338-008
Client Sample ID: TWN-60_02192013
Collection Date: 2119/2013 1515h
Received Date: 2/22/2013 lllOh
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2/27/2013 2014h E300.0 1.00
2/22/2013 145lh E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
< 1.00
< 0.100
Report Date: 3/1/2013 Page 11 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use_ of t~e name of this company or any member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in_ co.nnection ~ith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or in connection with the re_-publication of ~is:report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABO RATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302239-019
Client Sample ID: TW4-60_02142013
Collection Date: 2114/2013 0805h
Received Date: 2115/2013 lOOOh
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2119/2013 0715h E300.0 1.00
2115/2013 1600h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
< 1.00
< 0.100
Report Date: 2/26/2013 Page 25 of 58
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located· on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee, Privileges of
subsequent use_ of the name of this comi>any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in_ c?nnection ~ith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or in connection with the;re_-publication of 0is report for any
American West ANALYTICA L LABORATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
:::-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1302338-009
Client Sample ID: TWN-65_02182013
Collection Date: 2/18/2013 1351h
Received Date: 2/22/2013 lllOh
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg!L
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
2/27/2013 210lh E300.0 10.0
2/22/2013 1453h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
25.9
1.51
Report Date: 3/1/2013 Page 12 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use_ of t~e name of this comilany or any member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in_ c~nnection \\lith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or in connection with the re_-jlublication ?f ~is report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
:::-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1302338
American West Analytical Laboratories received 12 sample( s) on 2/22/2013 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
This is a revision to a report originally issued 3/1/2013. Pages 1, 13, and 14 have been
revised.
Thank You, K y I e F ~ ~~~;::.:·:~:::;A';:~. /\!~,!J=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G email=[e-mail], c=US r 0 s ~--Qate':'"-Qot,_~20 13:32:32 -06'00'
Approved by: L.,.._ __ ___....l/~-______ ____J
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 3/20/2013 Page I of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use_ of t~e name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in_ connection "':ith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or in connection with the re_-publication of t~is report for any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Lab Set ID: 1302338
Date Received: 2/22/2013 111 Oh
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South 1302338-001A TWN-01R 02182013 2118/2013 1218h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 1302338-0018 TWN-01R 02182013 2/18/2013 1218h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302338-002A TWN-01 02182013 2118/2013 1241h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302338-0028 TWN-01 02182013 2118/2013 1241h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Phone: [phone] 1302338-003A TWN-07 02192013 2/19/2013 1025h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Toll Free: [phone] 1302338-0038 TWN-07 02192013 2/19/2013 1025h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: [phone] 1302338-004A TWN-04 02182013 2/18/2013 1351h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302338-0048 TWN-04 02182013 2118/2013 1351h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
~-mail: [e-mail] 1302338-005A TWN-18 02182013 2118/2013 1440h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302338-0058 TWN-18_Q2182013 2/18/2013 1440h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2 web: www.awal-labs.com 1302338-006A TWN-03 02192013 2/19/2013 1045h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302338-0068 TWN-03 02192013 2119/2013 1045h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302338-007A TWN-02 02192013 2119/2013 1052h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1302338-0078 TWN-02 02192013 2/19/2013 1052h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Laboratory Director 1302338-008A TWN-60 02192013 2/19/2013 1515h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302338-0088 TWN-60 02192013 2119/2013 1515h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Jose Rocha 1302338-009A TWN-65 02182013 2118/2013 1351h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
QA Officer 1302338-0098 TWN-65 02182013 2118/2013 1351h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302338-010A Piez-0 1 021920 13 2119/2013 1412h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302338-0108 Piez-0 1 021920 13 2119/2013 1412h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302338-011A Piez-02 021920 13 2/19/2013 1345h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302338-0118 Piez-02 021920 13 2/19/2013 1345h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302338-012A Piez-03 02192013 2/19/2013 1400h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302338-0128 Piez-03 02192013 2/19/2013 1400h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 3/1/2013 Page 2 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use_ of t~e name of this comP.any or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in_ c?nnection with! the advertisement, promotion or sale _of any product or p~o_cess, or in connection with the re_-publication of ~is report for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
1302338 Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
2/22/2013
2118 & 2/19/2013
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Corrective Action: None required.
\
Report Date: 3/1/2013 Page 3 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampli11g information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use_ of t~e name of this com{Jany or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in_ connection with the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or in connection with the re_-publication of t?is report for any
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1302338
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
SampleiD
LCS-R50993
LCS-R50830
Analyte
Chloride
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 5.11 5.000 0 102 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.02 1.000 0 102 90-110
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
2/27/2013 1535h
2/22/2013 1432h
Report Date: 3/112013 Page 16 of 19
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1302338
Project:
Sample ID
MB-R50993
MB-R50830
1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Analyte
Chloride
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00 -
mg/L E353.2 < 0.100 -
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
2/27/2013 1511h
2/22/2013 1431h
Report Date: 3/1/2013 Page 17 of 19
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1302338
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Sample ID
1302338-001AMS
1302338-001BMS
1302339-001DMS
Analyte
Chloride
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 5.14 5.000 0 103 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.00 1.000 0 100 90-110
mg/L E353.2 0.996 1.000 0.008600 98.8 90-110
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
2/27/2013 1621h
2/22/2013 1441h
2/22/2013 1511h
Report Date: 3/1/2013 Page 18 of 19
1 analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1302338
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013
Sample ID
1302338-001AMSD
1302338-001BMSD
1302339-001DMSD
Analyte
Chloride
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg!L E300.0 5.11 5.000 0 102 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.07 1.000 0 107 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.02 1.000 0.008600 101 90-110
%RPD
0.586
6.3
2.64
RPD
Limit
20
10
10
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
2/27/2013 1645h
2/22/2013 1443h
2/22/2013 1512h
Report Date: 3/1/2013 Page 19 of 19
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1302338 Page 1 of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 3/5/2013
Client ID: DENIOO Contact: Garrin Pahner
Project: 1st Quarter Nitrate 2013 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (no chromatograms). MUST report project specific DL's: Cl@ I mg!L, N02/N03 @ 0.1 mg/L. EDD-Denison & LOCUS. Email Group; &
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1302338-00lA T~~11t_02182013 2/18/2013 1218h 2/22/2013 111 Oh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302338-001B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
130233 8-002A T~-01_02182013 2/18/2013 1241h 2/22/2013 lllOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302338-002B N02/N03-W -353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302338-003A ~-07 _02192013 2/19/2013 1025h 2/22/2013 lllOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302338-003B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302338-004A ~-04_02182013 2/18/2013 1351h 2/22/2013 lllOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302338-004B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302338-00SA ~-18_02182013 2/18/2013 1440h 2/22/2013 1110h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302338-00SB N02/N03-W -353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302338-006A ~-03_02192013 2/19/2013 1045h 2/22/2013 U 10h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302338-006B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302338-00?A ~-02_02192013 2/19/2013 1052h 2/22/2013 1110h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302338-00?B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302338-008A TWN-60_02192013 2/19/2013 1515h 2/22/2013 1110h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302338-00SB N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
Printed: 2/22/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M ~ RT rg/" CN if' TAT ~· QC 07 HO~ HOK __ HOK __ COCEmailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1302338 Page2of2
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 3/5/2013
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1302338-009A ~-65_02182013 2/18/2013 1351h 2/22/2013 1110h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302338-009B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302338-010A Piez-01_ 02192013 2/19/2013 1412h 2/22/2013 lllOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302338-0lOB N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302338-0llA Piez-02_ 02192013 2/19/2013 1345h 2/22/2013 111 Oh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SELAnalytes: CL
1302338-0llB N02/N03-W -353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302338-012A Piez-03_02192013 2/19/2013 1400h 2/22/2013 lllOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-cl
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302338-0 12B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
Printed: 2/22/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK __ HOK __ HOK___ COC Emailed~----
Client ~aa-~ ·t=~~ls
Address .~~:ZSS > 1-\W; l91 ·
tslMairut u=t · 34511
City .._) State Zip
Phone ~ £?7K 2'Z'Z I. Fax.._ ____ _
Contact G~rc; n B.ln1v~"
E-mail 0\\ m~r-ene
Project Name sr ·. u :t, r
Project Number/P.O.# _________ _
Sampler Name:::Gianrc Hall iJ..~ Date/Time
Collected
AMERICAN CHAIN OF
WEST
ANALYTICAL CUSTODY
LADORA TORIES [phone]
463 West 3600 South [phone]
Salt Lake City, Utah Fax [phone]
84115 Email:[e-mail]
~ ~
F ·-i ·~ ! < ~ 8 ~~ X 'a ., L. •t: ... ~ 0
TESTS REQUIRED
Lab Sample Set# I 'bD~
Page ) of _,_,:.( __
Turn Around Time (Circle One)
1 day 2day 3day 4day 5day~
QC LEVEL
1 2 2+
CD 3+ 4
LABORATORY USE ONLY
SAi~ERE: 1 1pp r hand delivered!
oes: fi?cj £;X
.• 2 Ambient~ .... lf"'
Notes: oY\ \C.'<..
3 Temperature 2. 2 a; ~ ·e ~
• Sample 10 ~ ~ i \.) . COMMENTS 14 Received Broken/Lea_ king
1 . · _' v · (Improperly Seale~
"'1"vJA>-D \ R 0'2.lS'<'2..0\3 . -. '2-/HOt:l l'2.1K VI il '/:... f\ ~otes: U
lT\AUJU.-o_OJ. .... J}.~lK201:3>_ rz../Jt./1~ )'2 ... , vJ z X X t"::.:~~~~~~----------T~£?:~~~¥:¥-~rf~-t-+-l-t-+~--1-+-----~-------·-_-J s l!r1erly Preserv~ 2 ~~~~ y N
~JJS/l~ JYYO W C2, "' "' Notes:
rrwAJ-o3_02.JCf201~ ~-~----Lz/Jct/13 1oY.s _bil'll~l).
l"T'wA> -o2-o 2 ''l2.o 13 I:Ylifll~ 1 o s ~~-I"" 1-z.l "A I 'f..
'"fvJA>-60_o'2.\q?..o)3 t~/i'ln~ 1s1~ lwl21~ I~
1"wJJ-bS_o"2Jgzot~ · 1'2/JS'/13 l~SI lvJI~I"i I~
p, ez.-o·\_02.\t:Jzo 1~ __ l"l/ ~~~r; _JY ~~ lw 1~ I ).I ~
6 Received Within
~ingTimes N
lirrttes:
coc Tape Was: r-~~--------------------------------~~~~~~--+-~~~~+--+--+-~~~~~~~~--------------~ 1 Present on Outer
Package
Date Y N
'Z/ZI/1"3 ~
) 100 Package ~ Time 12 Unbroken on Outer
y N ~
Relinquished By: Signature I Date ·
3 Present on Sample. . e;
I I ~ II y N . e_D
I Relinquished By: Slpnatwe I Date II R-By: Signature I Date I : 4 ~-~ Sample ~D Time PRINT NAME PRINT NAME Time
Time ·PRINT NAME PRINT NAME Time I I , II Discrepancies Between Sample Labels and CO
I Relinquished By: Blrlnatu"' I Date II R-By: Sir/nature I Date i : ~? ~
Notes: · tJ
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME Time
Bott]e Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02&N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TOX
TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Frequency:
SampleSet: )"302-1JD8
Preservation Check Sheet
Preservative All -==pL . .,.....,..,.,..., -..;;.1\vOtJL '-1\""'f" , ........ ,.... '-"""'t-'' ~ .......... ,... '-""'"'t-'' L;AwCIJL -except J::JI.I.,;CIJL c_,~~n~ '-""'"I"'
s le Set Ext doH -"dQ_ Zfv,tJ.
OK -rol 1-m2----m"b 1-rNJ f--t:n_c; 1-n"'in -dJI --e-r-R 1-f)-o -hlr: -oll -oJ·Z-
pH <2 H2S04
pH <2 H2S04
PH>12Na0H
pH <2 HN03
pH <2 H2S04 \lOS ~ 1'\fQ.S r::Ee:s \/~ 1\/e:s. "~ ~ ~es 1\/e$ \Je_s ~
pH <2 H2S04 I • I , ~
pH <2 HCL
pH <2 H2S04
pH> 9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH <2 H2S04
pH <2 H3P04
pH <2 H2S04
·pH <2 H2S04
pH<2HCL
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample 1id
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
f . J • I II
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
I ,-
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
American West Blanding, UT 84511
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
;:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
TEL: [phone]
RE: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2013
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1302239
American West Analytical Laboratories received 22 sample(s) on 2/15/2013 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited byThe National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
F • Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
DN: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL, Kyle
Gross
ou=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
email=[e-mail], c=US
Date:201,3..01.26 15:53:25 -07'00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 2/26/2013 Page 1 of 58
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
. subsequent use of the name of this comj)any or any member of its staff, o,r reproduction of this report in_ c~nnection with the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or D) connection with the re_-publication of t~i~ report for any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANALYTI CAL LABORATORI ES Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2013
Lab Set ID: 1302239
Date Received: 2/15/2013 1000h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1302239-001A MW-32 02132013 2/13/2013 1500h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
'alt Lake City, UT 84115 1302239-001B MW-32 02132013 2/13/2013 1500h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302239-001C MW-32 02132013 2/13/2013 1500h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Phone: [phone] 1302239-002A TW4-25 02112013 2/1112013 0850h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302239-002B TW4-25 02112013 2/11/2013 0850h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1302239-002C TW4-25 02112013 2/1112013 0850h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
~-mail: [e-mail] 1302239-003A TW4-24 02112013 2/1112013 0910h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
13 0223 9-003 B TW4-24 02112013 2/11/2013 0910h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1302239-003C TW4-24 02112013 2111/2013 0910h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1302239-004A TW4-22 02112013 2/1112013 0926h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1302239-004B TW4-22 02112013 211112013 0926h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302239-004C TW4-22 02112013 2/1112013 0926h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1302239-005A MW-26 02112013 2/1112013 1010h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1302239-005B MW-26 02112013 211112013 1010h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1302239-005C MW-26 02112013 211112013 1010h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1302239-006A MW-04 02112013 2/1112013 1020h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302239-006B MW-04 02112013 2/11/2013 1020h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302239-006C MW-04 02112013 2/11/2013 1020h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1302239-007 A TW4-04 02112013 2/1112013 1030h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302239-007B TW4-04 02112013 2/1112013 1030h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
130223 9-007 c TW4-04 02112013 2/1112013 1030h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1302239-008A TW4-19 02112013 2/11/2013 1100h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
130223 9-008B TW4-19 02112013 2/1112013 1100h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302239-008C TW4-19 02112013 2/1112013 1100h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1302239-009A TW4-20 02112013 211112013 0950h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302239-009B TW4-20 02112013 2/1112013 0950h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302239-009C TW4-20 02112013 2/11/2013 0950h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1302239-010A TW4-05 02132013 2/13/2013 1237h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302239-010B TW4-05 02132013 · 2/13/2013 1237h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 2/26/2013 Page 2 of 58
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed,in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exClusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use_ of t~e ,name of this comjJany or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in_ c?nnection V:ith the advertisement, promotion or sale _of any product or p~o_cess, or in connection with the re_-publication of this report for any
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2013
American West Lab Set ID: 1302239
ANALYTICAL LABORAT OR I ES Date Received: 2115/2013 lOOOh
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
1302239-0lOC TVV4-05 02132013 2/13/2013 1237h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
463 VV est 3600 South 1302239-0llA TVV4-06 02132013 2/13/2013
8260C/5030C
1247h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
;altLake City, UT 84115 1302239-0llB TVV4-06 02132013 2/13/2013 1247h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302239-0llC TVV4-06 02132013 2113/2013 1247h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1302239-012A TVV4-18 02132013 2/13/2013 1304h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Phone: [phone] 1302239-012B TVV4-18 02132013 2/13/2013 1304h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Toll Free: [phone] 1302239-012C TVV4-18 02132013 2113/2013 1304h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
~-mail: [e-mail] 1302239-013A TVV4-10 02132013 2/13/2013 1318h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302239-013B TVV4-10 02132013 2/13/2013 1318h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com 1302239-013C TVV4-10 02132013 2/13/2013 1318h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1302239-014A TVV4-21 02132013 2113/2013 1331h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302239-014B TVV4-21 02132013 2/13/2013 1331h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Kyle F. Gross 1302239-014C TVV4-21 02132013 2113/2013 1331h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Laboratory Director 8260C/5030C
1302239-015A TVV4-11 02132013 2/13/2013 1341h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Jose Rocha 1302239-015B TVV4-11 02132013 2113/2013 1341h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
QA Officer 1302239-015C TVV4-11 02132013 2113/2013 1341h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1302239-016A TVV4-07 02132013 2/13/2013 1349h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302239-016B TVV4-07 02132013 2113/2013 1349h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302239-016C TVV4-07 02132013 2113/2013 1349h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1302239-017A TVV4-01 02132013 2113/2013 1355h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302239-017B TVV4-01 02132013 2/13/2013 1355h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302239-017C TVV4-01 02132013 2/13/2013 1355h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1302239-018A TVV4-02 02132013 2113/2013 1403h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302239-018B TVV4-02 02132013 2113/2013 1403h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302239-018C TVV4-02 02132013 2113/2013 1403h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1302239-019A TVV4-60 02142013 2/14/2013 0805h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302239-019B TVV4-60 02142013 2/14/2013 0805h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1302239-019C TVV4-60 02142013 2/14/2013 0805h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1302239-020A TVV4-70 02132013 2/13/2013 1304h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1302239-020B TVV4-70 02132013 2113/2013 1304h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 2/26/2013 Page 3 of 58
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e name of this comP.any or any member of its stafii or reproduction df this report in_ c?nnection ~ith the adverti~ement, pro_motion onsale _of any product or p~~ess, on in connection ~ith the re:publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Date Received:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
1st Quarter Chloroform 2013
1302239
2115/2013 lOOOh
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
1302239-020C TW4-70 02132013
1302239-021A Trip Blank
1302239-022A TW4-05R 02122013
1302239-022B TW4-05R 02122013
1302239-022C TW4-05R 02122013
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Collected Matrix Analysis
2113/2013 1304h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
2111/2013 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
2/12/2013 0714h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
2/12/2013 0714h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
2112/2013 0714h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 2/26/2013 Page 4 of 58
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to·NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is' provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of ,
subsequent use oft~e name of this comJ>any or any member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in_ c?nnection "':'ith the advertisement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pr~ess, or_ in connection with the re_-publication of !his report for any
Inorganic Case Narrative
American West Client: ANALYTICA L LAB ORATORIES Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
1st Quarter Chloroform 20 13
1302239
2/15/2013
2/11, 2/12, 2/13, & 2114/2013
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 2/26/2013 Page 5 of 58
All analyses applicable to the CWA; SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive nse of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use_ of t~e name of this comJlany or any member of its staff, or reproductioniof this report in_ c~nnection \\'ith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or pro_cess, or in connection with the re_-publication oft~ is report for any
Volatile Case Narrative
American West Client: ANALYTIC A L LAB O RATO RIES Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
;:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
1st Quarter Chloroform 20 13
1302239
2/15/2013
2/11, 2112, 2/13, & 2/14/2013
Intact
None
SW-846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: Multiple target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exception: The MSD percent recovery was outside of control limits on
chloroform for sample 1302239-00SC due to sample matrix interference.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 2/26/2013 Page 6 of 58
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfomied in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of '
subsequent use_ of t~e name of this comj)any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in_ c~nnection V:ith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale _of any product or p~o_ce~s, .or in connection with the re_-publication of ~is report for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1302239
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2013
Sample ID
MB-R50669
MB-R50718
MB-R50606
MB-R50607
Analyte
Chloride
Chloride
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00 -
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00 -
mg/L E353.2 < 0.10 -
mg/L E353.2 < 0.100 -
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
2/18/2013 1803h
2/19/2013 1053h
2/15/2013 1519h
2/15/2013 1616h
Report Date: 2/26/2013 Page 51 of 58
1 analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATOR I ES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1302239
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 20 13
Sample ID Analyte
1-3 0223 9-00 1 AMS Chloride
1302239-011AMS Chloride
1302239-022AMS Chloride
1302239-001 BMS Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
1302239-011BMS Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
1302239-022BMS Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
OC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 526 500.0 34.35 98.4 90-110
mg/L E300.0 559 500.0 40.44 104 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5.17 5.000 0 103 90-110
mg/L E353.2 0.97 1.000 0.06540 90.1 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.1 1.000 0.1544 93.2 90-110
mg/L E353.2 0.937 1.000 0.002900 93.4 90-110
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
2/18/2013 1925h
2/19/2013 0214h
2/19/2013 1211h
2/15/2013 1605h
2/15/2013 1608h
2/15/2013 1624h
Report Date: 2/26/2013 Page 52 of 58
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1302239
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 20 13
Sample ID Analyte
1302239-001AMSD Chloride
1302239-011AMSD Chloride
1302239-022AMSD Chloride
1302239-001 BMSD Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
1302239-011BMSD Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
1302239-022BMSD Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 526 500.0 34.35 98.3 90-110
mg/L E300.0 526 500.0 40.44 97.1 90-110
mg!L E300.0 5.17 5.000 0 103 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.0 1.000 0.06540 94.6 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.1 1.000 0.1544 94.0 90-110
mg/L E353.2 0.975 1.000 0.002900 97.2 90-110
%RPD
0.0243
6.11
0.0387
4.56
0.725
4.03
RPD
Limit
20
20
20
10
10
10
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
2/18/2013 1952h
2119/2013 0241h
2/19/2013 1236h
2/15/2013 1607h
2115/2013 1609h
2/15/2013 1626h
Report Date: 2/26/2013 Page 53 of 58
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1302239 Page 1 of4
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 2/26/2013
Client ID: DENlOO Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 1st Quarter Chloroform 2013 QC Level: III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 & Summary. EDD-Denison. Email Group. RL of 1 ppm for Chloride and VOC and 0.1 ppm for N02/N03. Expected levels provided by
client-see Jenn. J-flag what we can't meet.;
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1302239-001A ~-32~02132013 2/13/2013 1500h 2/15/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-001B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-001C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge ___ 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1302239-002A 1rVV4-25_02112013 2/11/2013 0850h 2/15/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SELAnalytes: CL
l302239-002B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-002C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1302239-003A TVV4-24_02112013 2/11/2013 0910h 2/15/2013 IOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
· 1302239-003B N02/N03-W -353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-003C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1302239-004A TW4-22_02112013 2/11/2013 0926h 2/15/2013 lOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-0048 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-004C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1302239-00SA ~-26_02112013 2/11/2013 1010h 2/15/2013 1 OOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-0058 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-00SC 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1302239-006A ~-04_02112013 2/1112013 1020h 2/15/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
Printed: 2/15/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M ~RT~ CN [2(" TAT E(' QC [J/"' HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ COC Emailed...R l 2. -If-~
WORK ORDER Summary WorkOrder: 1302239 Page2 of4
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 2/26/2013
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1302239-006B ~-04_02112013 2/11/2013 1020h 2/15/2013 1 OOOh N02/N03-W-353.2 Aqueous ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-006C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1302239-007 A 11V4-04_02112013 2/11/2013 1 030h 2/15/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-007B N02/N03-W -353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-007C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 41# ofSurr: 4
1302239-008A TW4-19_02112013 2/11/2013 llOOh 2/15/2013 1 OOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-0088 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-008C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1302239-009A TW4-20_02112013 2/11/2013 0950h 2/15/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-009B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-009C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1302239-01 OA TW4-05_02132013 2/13/2013 1237h 2/15/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-010B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df -no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-010C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1302239-011A TW4-06_02132013 2/13/2013 1247h 2/15/2013 lOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-0 llB N02/N03-W -353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-011 c 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom,· #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1302239-012A TVV4-18_02132013 2/13/2013 1304h 2/15/2013 lOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-012B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
Printed: 2/15/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QCO HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1302239 Page 3 of4
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 2/26/2013
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1302239~012C TVV4-18_02132013 2/13/2013 1304h 2/15/2013 IOOOh 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1302239-013A TW4-10_02132013 2/13/2013 1318h 2/15/2013 IOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239~013B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-013C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1302239-014A TVV4-21_02132013 2/13/2013 1331h 2/15/2013 IOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SELAnalytes: CL
1302239-014B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-0 14C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1302239-0 15A TW4-11_02132013 2/13/2013 134111 2/15/2013 lOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-015B N02/N03~W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239~015C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1302239-016A TVV4-07_02132013 2/13/2013 1349h 2/15/2013 1 OOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-016B N02/N03-W -353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-0 16C 8260~W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1302239-017A TW4-01_02132013 2/13/2013 1355h 2/15/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-0 17B N02/N03-W~353.2 ~ df -no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239~017C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom,· #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1302239-0 18A TW4-02_02132013 2/13/2013 1403h 2/15/2013 lOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SELAnalytes: CL
1302239-0 18B N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N ·
1302239~018C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
Printed: 2/15/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1}: %MD RT D CND TAT 0 QCD HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ COCEmailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1302239 Page 4 of4
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 2/26/2013
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1302239-019A TW4-60_02142013 2/14/2013 0805h 2/15/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-0198 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-019C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# ofSurr: 4
1302239-020A 1lVV4-70_02132013 2/13/2013 1304h 2/15/2013 lOOOh 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-0208 N02/N03-W -353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-020C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1302239-021A Trip Blank 2/11/2013 2/15/2013 1000h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; # of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
1302239-022A TW4-05lt_02122013 2/12/2013 0714h 2/15/2013 1000h 300.0-W Aqueous ~ df-wc
1 SEL Analytes: CL
1302239-0228 N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3
1 SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1302239-022C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; # of Analytes: 4 I# of Surr: 4
Printed: 2/15/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK __ HOK __ HOK___ COC Emailedl....-----
Client Cn~ buh
Address .~~ 'Z .S »"':5 )9 l
R) ~~~nil_.. . ___ 1A:L__ _____ ·~~J I
AMERICAN CHAIN OF
WEST
ANALYTICAL CUSTODY
LABORATORIES [phone]
463 West 3600 South [phone]
Salt Lake City, Utah Fax [phone]
84115 Email:[e-mail]
-•. ,
Lab Sample Set# 13 O.l43 7
Page ) of _.....;z.=---
Tum Around Time (Circle One)
1 day 2 day 3 day 4 day 5 dayS
~-City :::.)----State .Zip
Phone 435 ~/l} 21.'ZJ Fax~----­
(~~Arr\n PIA\rt1cf ---------~-TESTS REQUIRED
E-mail ~00eneeo~.:.ls.. com QC LEVEL LABORATORY USE ONLY
i # SA E RE:
Project Name I.S.'T Q~rY"-lcr-Cblot:~al '2.013 ~ .. c 1 2 2+ 1 hipped r hand delivered
~ te ·
Project Number/P.O.# Date/Time ~ < J <1)3+ . 2 Ambient ore
Sampler Name --rD:llner Gal}id~~ Collected ~ + -o 4 0 Notes: f (,) ,Vt ~ •t, ~ tGL X 'a "t: I ~ ~ () 3 Temperature ..( .. 2 (ii c -*-~ Sample 10 ~ z ~ < ~ COMMENTS 4 Received Broken/Leaking
J4w·-i2_0Z-l$2o\3 '2-/13/13. \500 X X 'i . (Improperly~
~ '5 y N
Notes:
i'Tw '-\---'LS-a?.ll z.o \.3 2/tl I J3 0~~0 w s ~· v 'f
~wl..\.-Z.l.\_.O'Z.ll20l3 '2./Jt/l3 0'\ 10
5 Properly Preserved w I!,
""
X -y. ~ecked at Bene~
'iw 4 -2'"l._o 'Z.l J 2.01~ 2./11/l~ t)'l2b w s X ~ ~ y N
Notes:
M \\}-2.6_tYZ. \\20\ ~ ~lll/13 lD10 w s 'X 'I "{.
IMW-o4_07..ll20l3 2/ll/)3 \D'ZD w .s 'I( )C ~
i'TWL\..-Dlf_O'Z.liZOl3 2/IJ/1'1 \ D30 w s "' .'A 6 Received Within )( G!gllmes
hVJ~-)Cf_O'Zll'Z-01~ 2{\1/)3 \100 ~ y: x N s~ I""'-:
t1\tJ 4 -'2.0-oz. \)2.0 1:> · 2111/13 oqso ~ s X }C ,')(
~wt.t -o.5_oz1~20\3 '2./ r:l J 3 ) Z:S/ ~ ~· "X "( 'f.
'T'N4--Qb_.oz 13>2ol3 '2/ JiJ 13. \ 'Z. '-17 w .s 1\ 'f..
"'
coc Tape Was:
!
"'f'WL\ ... l5< .... 02..l320l3 ?../1~/ 1:3 1'30Lf ~ .s X )( "-1 Present on Outer !
Relinquish~~.J~~}ignature JL.J/L Date Received By: Signature Date Special Instructions: <SckageN NA
·,J!f.mnr -z/1-1/zt>r)
PRINT NAM~ »ll :1
4
-rirroo PRINT NAME Time 2 Unbroken on Outer '"nn~r-.n lau ~~age N I
NAi
Relinquished By: Signature .., Date Received By: Signature Date I
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME Time
3 Present on Sample. ~ Y N A
Relinquished By: Signature Date Received By: Signature Date 4 Unbroken on Sample~
Y N N !
I
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME Time Discrepancies Between
Sample Labels and COC
Relinquished By: Signature Date Recei~ti£.ature c/£. ___/ o:1r/ Record? 0 y ~//1. Notes:
PRINT NAME Time PRINTNAME..;-/ }/ ..... , Time '
Client._ ______________ _
Address _______________ _
City State Zip
Fax ___________ __ Phoneu_n 1c __
~;omact <;;::/ -c ~ } E 'I . .G\tr\ -ma1
f~ ) Project Name \ Project Number/P.O.# Date/Time
Collected Sampler Name
Sample ID
-M'-l-10 ... 02. 15zot> 7../)"!:J)?.> t~,g
"'f~L-1-z.J ... oz.\~ 2.0)3 "2../1'?:/ J :l j~l
':fW4~J)_OZ.l~20)~ -2./l$/1'3> ):3lil
""fW4-07-Otol·~zo 13 ?-/l3/J3 \3'-1~
,,-~L\-OL oi 15"2013--z./13/ I'!> }:35.5
rr-w4-o'2._02.)~'2.013 ?../1~1~ ·)'i03
.,...~ "i-bO_ o z.t '1 z.o J~ 2./1~/J~ ~80.5
1nN4-70_02\~ZO\~ "2./1~/}3 \30'-1
-frl p Slo.~ V, \ '2-/Jl/t~
r-r~~ 1Skil K. oz../ J '111'3
I 2/t't-//2. TtAJ it-o 5 R __ G2..tt..~o n 0//t.f
Relinquish~ Signature Jljd / Date Received By: Signature
... ~lliVV r -. •z./t'i/2.0 r-~
PRINT N~1 He IUL. 1/ Time PRINT NAME
o...nnf'..r' 0 I LY.i-HM
Relinquished By: Signature v Date Received By: Signature
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME
Relinquished By: Signature Date Received By: Signature
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME
Relinquished By: Signature Date Receiv~:re o{(
PRINT NAME Time PRINTNA~i-LL/ '
X ·c::
10 ::!
vJ
V)
\J.)
vJ
vJ
vJ
w
\It)
~
~
CHAIN OF
CUSTODY
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LADORA TORIES [phone] 463 West 3600 South [phone]
Salt Lake City, Utah Fax [phone]
· 84115 Email:[e-mail]
TESTS REQUIRED
~ ,f 1:::.
i .£ ~ ~ '< 0 ~ -+-0 '?:: 0 -{ I 0 0 ~ ? ~ z ~ ~
:s .~ 'f.. 'f.
~ ''f.. '{.. )<
5 '{.. '/. 'f.
5 ·y. )< y;
5 y:. Y... )(
"S y:_ '1. 'f.
s "( 'f. )<
~ X y:. ""-3 X -.....
s-'A X X"
Date Special Instructions:
Time
Date
Time
Date
Time
--/ 0/'dA t_.,/1';]?
Tim'·-
Lab Sample Set# I~ 0 l.1.J 7'
Page '~ of ~
Turn Around Time (Circle One)
1day 2day 3day 4day 5d~
QC LEVEL LABORATORY USE ONLY
s I:.ES ERE:
1 2 2+ 1 Shipp or hand delivered : Fet>{7(
cD . 2 Ambient or~ 3+ 4 Notes: ,
~ l<:..e_.
3 Temperature Z • r
COMMENTS 4 Received Broken/Leaking 1
· ~mproperly Sea~ I
Notes:
5 ~ PJeSe!Ved y N
eked at Bench y N
Notes:
6 Received Within
~ingnmes N es:
.. ~~h'l
-/ .1" ~.JL a.tlrld ..,. A t<G .1, coc Tape Was:
J "~J 1 Present on Outer
~kage N NA
2 cy-on Outer kage
y N NA
y N N.t\ 3 Present on Sample. e
4 Unbroken on Sample e Y N NA
..t.
Discrepancies Between
Sample labels and COC
Record? EJ· y
Notes:
....,
GJ GJ ..c V)
~ u GJ ..c u
c 0 ;;
(0 > ...
GJ U)
GJ ... a.
en
M N
N 0 t'l')
~
#
+J (J)
Vl
(J) c.
E
C'C Vl
..c
('0 __.
o::t o::t 0 0 V) V)
N N :t: :t:
N N v v
:t: :t: a. a.
·;, ·;,
0 0 z z ....... ~ N 0 0 z z
TabH
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-1 Field Data Evaluation
Location 2x
TWN-2 , TW4-22, TW4-24, and TW4-25 ar~ co~tinuously pumping ;ells.
Piezometers 1, 2, and 3 were not pumped, only one set of parameters were taken.
TWN-3 and TWN-7 were pumped dry and sampled after recovery.
RPD > 10%. Per the revised QAP Revision 7 .2, Attachment 2-3, when a well is purged to dryness, only pH, temperature and specific conductance parameters are required to be within 10% RPD. Redox potential and turbidity parameters are measured for information
purposes only and as such are not required to meet the 10% RPD criteria used for pH, specific conductance and temperature.
H-2: Holding Time Evaluation
H-3: Analytical Method Check
Chloride
A4500-Cl B or A4500-Cl E
orE300.0 E300.0
Both Nitrate and Chloride were analyzed with the correct analytical method.
H-5 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control Limits for Analysis and Blanks
All QC control limits for the 1st quarter of 2013 were within acceptable limits.
1302338 Piezometer 1, Piezometer 2, Piezometer 3, TWN-1, TWN-2,
TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-7, TWN-18, TWN-60, TWN-65
H -8 Rinsate Evaluation
All Rinsate and DI Blank samples were non-detect for the 1st quarter of 2013.
Tab I
Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
NS =not sampled; ND =not detected
......._10 -MW-4
.4.8
TW4·1
0 7
TWN-1
<>o.?
PIEZ-1
~ 0.2
TW4-28
~NS
kriged nitrate isocon and label
kriged nitrate isocon and label
(extent uncertain)
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed March, 2013 (not sampled)
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells; TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2013 NITRATE (mg/L)
(NITRATE+ NITRITE as N)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE I FIGURE
H:/718000/may13/nitrate/Unt0313_rev.srf I -1
NS = not sampled; ND = not detected
""'-100 chloride isocon and label
MW-4
.38
TW4-1
0 38
TWN-1
<>18
PIEZ-1
Q 57
TW4-28
~NS
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed March, 2013 (not sampled)
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are chloroform pumping wells; TW4-22, TW4-24, TW4-25, and TWN-2 are nitrate pumping wells
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2013 CHLORIDE (mg/L)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H :/718000/may13/chloride/Ucl0313 _rev .srf I-2
TabJ
Analyte Concentrations Over Time
TWN-1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 0.7 19
7/21/2009 0.4 17
9/21/2009 0.4 19
10/28/2009 0.5 18
3/17/2010 0.5 17
5/26/2010 0.6 20
9/27/2010 0.6 19
12/7/2010 0.6 14
1/26/2011 0.5 17
4/20/2011 0.5 19
7/26/2011 0.5 14
10/17/2011 0.5 10
1/9/2012 0.6 15
4/18/2012 0.6 17
7/24/2012 0.6 17
10/15/2012 0.432 17.5
2/18/2013 0.681 17.6
TWN-2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 25.4 29
7/21/2009 25 25
9/21/2009 22.6 17
11/2/2009 20.8 55
3/24/2010 62.1 85
6/2/2010 69 97
9/29/2010 69 104
12/9/2010 48 93
2/1/2011 43 93
4/28/2011 40 85
7/28/2011 33 74
10/20/2011 33 76
1/12/2012 31 86
4/20/2012 48 103
7/31/2012 54 93
10/17/2012 22.1 79
2/19/2013 57.3 80.5
TWN-3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 23.6 96
7/21/2009 25.3 96
9/21/2009 27.1 99
11/2/2009 29 106
3/25/2010 25.3 111
6/3/2010 26 118
7/15/2010 27 106
12/10/2010 24 117
2/1/2011 24 138
4/28/2011 26 128
7/29/2011 25 134
10/20/2011 25 129
1/12/2012 25 143
4/20/2012 24 152
7/31/2012 27 158
10/17/2012 12.1 149
2/19/2013 22.2 157
TWN-4
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/6/2009 1 13
7/21/2009 0.05 12
9/21/2009 0.4 13
10/28/2009 0.4 11
3/16/2010 0.9 22
5/27/2010 1.0 22
9/27/2010 0.9 19
12/8/2010 1 21
1/25/2011 0.9 21
4/20/2011 0.9 21
7/26/2011 1.1 35
10/18/2011 0.9 20
1/9/2012 0.9 20
4/18/2012 1.1 24
7/25/2012 1.4 25
10/15/2012 1.45 26.4
2/18/2013 1.51 25.3
TWN-5
Date Nitrate ( mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 0.22 42
9/21/2009 0.5 45
11/10/2009 0.2 48
3/16/2010 0.3 43
5/26/2010 0.3 44
7/12/2010 0.3 43
12/7/2010 0.3 45
1/25/2011 0.4 47
4/20/2011 0.3 44
7/26/2011 0.3 44
10/17/2011 0.3 45
1/9/2012 0.2 45
4/18/2012 0.3 39
7/24/2012 0.3 48
10/15/2012 0.1 43.5 Nitrate ND
TWN-6
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 3.2 32
9/22/2009 1.6 13
11/3/2009 1.4 21
3/23/2010 1.5 19
6/1/2010 1.4 22
7/13/2010 1.4 73
12/8/2010 1.2 21
1/26/2011 1.1 18
4/20/2011 1.5 22
7/27/2011 1.1 17
10/18/2011 1.4 21
1/10/2012 1.2 20
4/18/2012 1.1 22
7/25/2012 1.4 22
10/15/2012 0.786 20.4
TWN-7
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 ND 11
9/21/2009 ND 7
11/10/2009 0.1 7
3/17/2010 0.8 6
5/28/2010 1.2 6
7/14/2010 1.6 7
12/10/2010 1 4
1/27/2011 1.3 6
4/21/2011 1.7 6
7/29/2011 0.7 5
10/19/2011 2.2 6
1/11/2012 2.3 5
4/20/2012 1.2 6
7/26/2012 0.9 6
10/16/2012 0.641 5.67
2/19/2013 0.591 5.68
TWN-8
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
8/25/2009 0 11 Nitrate is ND
9/21/2009 0 12 Nitrate is ND
11/10/2009 0 12 Nitrate is ND
3/16/2010 0 11 Nitrate is ND
5/26/2010 0 11 Nitrate is ND
7/12/2010 0 11 Nitrate is ND
12/6/2010 0 9 Nitrate is ND
1/25/2011 0 13 Nitrate is ND
4/18/2011 0 10 Nitrate is ND
7/26/2011 0 18 Nitrate is ND
10/17/2011 0 10 Nitrate is ND
1/9/2012 0 11 Nitrate is ND
4/18/2012 0 15 Nitrate is ND
7/24/2012 0 11 Nitrate is ND
10/15/2012 0 11.1 Nitrate is ND
TWN-9
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 9.3 169
9/22/2009 8.9 201
11/10/2009 12 205
3/23/2010 7.6 183
6/1/2010 7.6 175
7/15/2010 10.7 210
12/9/2010 8 172
2/1/2011 9.5 217
4/28/2011 10 192
7/29/2011 11 208
10/20/2011 10.9 134
1/12/2012 12.2 202
4/20/2012 10.6 209
7/31/2012 12.3 215
10/15/2012 12.5 194
TWN-10
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
8/25/2009 1.1 19
9/22/2009 1.6 35
11/10/2009 1.4 26
3/23/2010 1.5 54
6/4/2010 1 30
7/14/2010 0.2 21
12/8/2010 1.3 28
1/27/2011 0.3 40
4/21/2011 1.2 28
7/27/2011 0.1 28
10/18/2011 0.2 33
1/10/2012 0.8 44
4/19/2012 0.9 28
7/25/2012 0.6 33
10/16/2012 0.119 30.8
TWN-11
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/3/2009 1.3 74
3/17/2010 1.4 73
6/4/2010 1.3 72
9/27/2010 1.4 76
12/8/2010 1.4 72
1/27/2011 1.4 84
4/26/2011 1.4 76
7/27/2011 0.1 76
10/17/2011 1.6 76
1/10/2012 1.6 69
4/19/2012 1.6 71
7/25/2012 1.8 77
10/16/2012 1.84 76.4
TWN-12
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/3/2009 0.5 109
3/17/2010 0.7 113
5/26/2010 0.8 106
7/12/2010 0.7 112
12/7/2010 0.7 103
1/26/2011 4.2 87
4/26/2011 1 109
7/26/2011 0.6 102
10/17/2011 1.2 87
1/10/2012 0.9 104
4/18/2012 1.2 106
7/25/2012 1.4 102
10/16/2012 1.41 101
TWN-13
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
11/4/2009 0.5 83
3/17/2010 0 47 Nitrate ND
5/26/2010 0.1 49
9/27/2010 0.2 53
12/7/2010 0.4 57
1/25/2011 1.6 103
4/26/2011 0 49 Nitrate ND
7/26/2011 0.1 49
10/17/2011 0 48 Nitrate ND
1/9/2012 0 46 Nitrate ND
4/18/2012 0 53 Nitrate ND
7/24/2012 0.1 48
10/15/2012 0 47.3 Nitrate ND
TWN-14
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/4/2009 3.4 32
3/24/2010 2.9 24
6/2/2010 2.9 30
7/15/2010 3.5 26
12/10/2010 4.2 28
1/28/2011 3.7 24
4/27/2011 3.5 30
7/29/2011 3.5 25
10/19/2011 3.9 27
1/11/2012 3.5 26
4/20/2012 3.4 27
7/27/2012 3.7 27
10/17/2012 4.03 27.4
TWN-15
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/10/2009 1.1 78
3/18/2010 0.7 43
5/28/2010 1.0 39
7/13/2010 1.0 36
12/9/2010 1.2 38
1/27/2011 1.4 43
4/27/2011 1.6 49
7/28/2011 1.6 47
10/19/2011 1.3 38
1/11/2012 1.5 38
4/20/2012 1.6 46
7/26/2012 2.1 so
10/17/2012 1.8 47
TWN-16
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/4/2009 1 39
3/17/2010 1.2 35
5/27/2010 0.2 35
9/27/2010 2.6 35
12/9/2010 2 30
1/27/2011 4.6 34
4/27/2011 1.6 39
7/27/2011 2.4 31
10/18/2011 2.6 34
1/10/2012 2.8 33
4/19/2012 2 so
7/25/2012 2.4 33
10/16/2012 2.5 32.1
TWN-17
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/4/2009 6.7 152
3/24/2010 10.4 78
6/3/2010 11 87
7/15/2010 8.9 66
12/10/2010 8 65
2/1/2011 8.6 90
4/28/2011 9 81
7/29/2011 8.5 74
10/20/2011 8.1 71
1/12/2012 8.7 79
4/20/2012 9.1 80
7/27/2012 9.5 85
10/17/2012 9.65 84.8
TWN-18
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/2/2009 1.3 57
3/17/2010 1.6 42
6/1/2010 1.8 63
9/27/2010 1.8 64
12/9/2010 1.6 59
1/27/2011 1.4 61
4/26/2011 1.8 67
7/28/2011 1.8 65
10/18/2011 1.9 60
1/10/2012 1.9 64
4/19/2012 2.1 64
7/26/2012 2.3 67
10/16/2012 1.95 67.5
2/18/2013 2.27 68.7
TWN-19
Date Nit rate ( mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
11/2/2009 7.4 125
3/23/2010 7.2 118
6/1/2010 6.2 113
9/29/2010 7.2 113
12/9/2010 7 107
2/1/2011 7 114
4/28/2011 6.9 120
7/28/2011 7.1 113
10/18/2011 6.5 108
1/10/2012 7 114
4/19/2012 6.8 117
7/26/2012 7.5 117
10/16/2012 7.7 118
TW4-19
Date Nitrate (mg/1} Date Chloride (mg/1}
7/22/2002 42.80 12/7/2005 81
9/12/2002 47.60 3/9/2006 86
3/28/2003 61.40 7/20/2006 123
6/23/2003 11.40 11/9/2006 134
7/15/2003 6.80 2/28/2007 133
8/15/2003 4.00 8/15/2007 129
9/12/2003 5.70 10/10/2007 132
9/25/2003 9.20 3/26/2008 131
10/29/2003 7.70 6/25/2008 128
11/9/2003 4.80 9/10/2008 113
8/16/2004 9.91 10/15/2008 124
9/17/2004 4.50 3/4/2009 127
3/16/2005 5.30 6/23/2009 132
6/7/2005 5.70 9/14/2009 43
8/31/2005 4.60 12/14/2009 124
12/1/2005 0.10 2/17/2010 144
3/9/2006 4.00 6/9/2010 132
6/14/2006 5.20 8/16/2010 142
7/20/2006 4.30 10/11/2010 146
11/9/2006 4.60 2/17/2011 135
2/28/2007 4.00 6/7/2011 148
8/15/2007 4.10 8/17/2011 148
10/10/2007 4.00 11/17/2011 148
3/26/2008 2.20 1/23/2012 138
6/25/2008 2.81 6/6/2012 149
9/10/2008 36.20 9/5/2012 149
10/15/2008 47.80 10/3/2012 150
3/4/2009 3.20 2/11/2013 164
6/23/2009 2.40
9/14/2009 0.10
12/14/2009 26.70
2/17/2010 2.00
6/9/2010 4.40
8/16/2010 5.90
10/11/2010 2.70
2/17/2011 17.00
6/7/2011 12.00
8/17/2011 3.00
11/17/2011 5.00
1/23/2012 0.60
6/6/2012 2.40
9/5/2012 2.50
10/3/2012 4.10
2/11/2013 7.99
The sampling program for TW4-19 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TW4-21
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
5/25/2005 14.6 12/7/2005 353
8/31/2005 10.1 3/9/2006 347
11/30/2005 9.6 7/20/2006 357
3/9/2006 8.5 11/8/2006 296
6/14/2006 10.2 2/28/2007 306
7/20/2006 8.9 6/27/2007 327
11/8/2006 8.7 8/15/2007 300
2/28/2007 8.7 10/10/2007 288
6/27/2007 8.6 3/26/2008 331
8/15/2007 8.6 6/25/2008 271
10/10/2007 8.3 9/10/2008 244
3/26/2008 14.3 10/15/2008 284
6/25/2008 8.8 3/11/2009 279
9/10/2008 7.6 6/24/2009 291
10/15/2008 8.0 9/15/2009 281
3/11/2009 8.3 12/22/2009 256
6/24/2009 8.1 2/25/2010 228
9/15/2009 9.2 6/10/2010 266
12/22/2009 8.4 8/12/2010 278
2/25/2010 8.4 10/13/2010 210
6/10/2010 12.0 2/22/2011 303
8/12/2010 14.0 6/1/2011 297
10/13/2010 7.0 8/17/2011 287
2/22/2011 9.0 11/16/2011 276
6/1/2011 13.0 1/19/2012 228
8/17/2011 14.0 6/13/2012 285
11/16/2011 13.0 9/13/2012 142
1/19/2012 15.0 10/4/2012 270
6/13/2012 11.0 2/13/2013 221
9/13/2012 13.0
10/4/2012 14.0
2/13/2013 11.8
The sampling program for TW4-21 was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005
to include analysis for chloride as well as nitrate. This change accounts for the
different number of data points represented above.
TW4-22
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
2/28/2007 20.9 347
6/27/2007 19.3 273
8/15/2007 19.3 259
10/10/2007 18.8 238
3/26/2008 39.1 519
6/25/2008 41.9 271
9/10/2008 38.7 524
10/15/2008 36.3 539
3/11/2009 20.7 177
6/24/2009 20.6 177
9/15/2009 40.3 391
12/29/2009 17.8 175
3/3/2010 36.6 427
6/15/2010 19 134
8/12/2010 18 127
8/24/2010 15 130
10/13/2010 16 134
2/23/2011 18 114
6/1/2011 17 138
8/17/2011 15 120
11/16/2011 19 174
1/19/2012 14 36
6/13/2012 12.8 35
9/12/2012 7 121
10/4/2012 14 130
2/11/2013 58 635
TW4-24
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
6/27/2007 26.1 770
8/15/2007 29 791
10/10/2007 24.7 692
3/26/2008 24.4 740
6/25/2008 45.3 834
9/10/2008 38.4 1180
10/15/2008 44.6 1130
3/4/2009 30.5 1010
6/24/2009 30.4 759
9/15/2009 30.7 618
12/17/2009 28.3 1080
2/25/2010 33.1 896
6/9/2010 30 639
8/11/2010 32 556
8/24/2010 31 587
10/6/2010 31 522
2/17/2011 31 1100
5/26/2011 35 1110
8/17/2011 34 967
11/16/2011 35 608
1/18/2012 37 373
6/6/2012 37 355
8/30/2012 37 489
10/3/2012 38 405
2/11/2013 35.9 1260
TW4-25
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Notes
6/27/2007 17.1 395
8/15/2007 16.7 382
10/10/2007 17 356
3/26/2008 18.7 374
6/25/2008 22.1 344
9/10/2008 18.8 333
10/15/2008 21.3 366
3/4/2009 15.3 332
6/24/2009 15.3 328
9/15/2009 3.3 328
12/16/2009 14.2 371
2/23/2010 14.4 296
6/8/2010 16 306
8/10/2010 14 250
10/5/2010 15 312
2/16/2011 15 315
5/25/2011 16 321
8/16/2011 16 276
11/15/2011 16 294
1/18/2012 16 304
5/31/2012 16 287
9/11/2012 17 334
10/3/2012 17 338
2/11/2013 9.04 190
MW-18
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
7/14/2009 ND 51
MW-19
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
7/14/2009 2.2 24
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 12.4 6/22/2005 125
9/22/2005 12.8 9/22/2005 125
12/14/2005 13.6 12/14/2005 128
3/22/2006 13.8 3/22/2006 125
6/21/2006 14.5 6/21/2006 124
9/13/2006 14.1 9/13/2006 118
10/25/2006 14.6 10/25/2006 124
3/15/2007 14.4 3/15/2007 125
8/22/2007 14.6 8/22/2007 126
10/24/2007 14.9 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 14.8 3/19/2008 118
6/3/2008 18.7 6/3/2008 125
8/4/2008 17.3 8/4/2008 121
11/5/2008 15.6 11/5/2008 162
2/3/2009 15.3 2/3/2009 113
5/13/2009 15.1 5/13/2009 122
8/24/2009 20.9 8/24/2009 118
10/14/2009 15.0 10/14/2009 129
1/20/2010 15.4 1/20/2010 106
2/9/2010 16.1 2/9/2010 127
4/27/2010 15.8 4/27/2010 97
5/24/2010 17.0 9/14/2010 111
6/15/2010 15.3 11/9/2010 126
8/24/2010 16.0 2/1/2011 134
9/14/2010 15.0 4/11/2011 134
10/19/2010 15.0 5/10/2011 128
11/9/2010 15.0 6/20/2011 127
12/14/2010 16.0 7/5/2011 127
1/10/2011 15.0 8/3/2011 126
2/1/2011 16.0 9/7/2011 145
3/14/2011 17.0 10/4/2011 129
4/11/2011 16.0 11/8/2011 122
5/10/2011 16.0 12/12/2011 124
6/20/2011 17.0 1/24/2012 124
7/5/2011 17.0 2/14/2012 126
8/3/2011 14.0 3/14/2012 128
9/7/2011 16.0 4/10/2012 128
10/4/2011 16.0 5/2/2012 124
11/8/2011 16.0 6/18/2012 131
12/12/2011 16.0 7/10/2012 128
1/24/2012 17.0 8/7/2012 139
2/14/2012 17.0 9/19/2012 130
3/14/2012 18.0 10/23/2012 135
4/10/2012 17.0 11/13/2012 114
5/2/2012 16.0 12/26/2012 122
MW-30
Date Nitrate (mg/1} Date Chloride (mg/1}
6/18/2012 15.0 1/23/2013 128
7/10/2012 17.0 2/26/2013 129
8/7/2012 18.0 3/20/2013 126
9/19/2012 16.0
10/23/2012 16.2
11/13/2012 18.5
12/26/2012 17.2
1/23/2013 19.2
2/26/2013 21.4
3/20/2013 14.3
Under the groundwater sampling progran, accelerated monitoring for nitrate began in MW-
30 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began. This difference accounts for
the different number of data points represented above.
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/22/2005 24.2 6/22/2005 139
9/22/2005 22.4 9/22/2005 136
12/14/2005 23.8 12/14/2005 135
3/22/2006 24.1 3/22/2006 133
6/21/2006 25.3 6/21/2006 138
9/13/2006 24.6 9/13/2006 131
10/25/2006 25.1 10/25/2006 127
3/15/2007 23.2 3/15/2007 132
3/15/2007 22.0 3/15/2007 132
8/27/2007 23.3 8/27/2007 136
10/24/2007 24.6 10/24/2007 122
3/19/2008 25.0 3/19/2008 124
6/3/2008 29.3 6/3/2008 128
8/4/2008 28.7 8/4/2008 124
11/11/2008 29.9 11/11/2008 119
2/3/2009 23.4 2/3/2009 115
5/13/2009 22.4 5/13/2009 124
8/24/2009 15.4 8/24/2009 122
10/14/2009 22.6 10/14/2009 138
2/9/2010 21.7 2/9/2010 128
4/20/2010 22.5 4/20/2010 128
5/21/2010 23.0 9/13/2010 139
6/15/2010 21.1 11/9/2010 138
8/24/2010 22.0 2/1/2011 145
9/13/2010 21.0 4/1/2011 143
10/19/2010 20.0 5/10/2011 143
11/9/2010 20.0 6/20/2011 145
12/14/2010 20.0 7/5/2011 148
1/10/2011 19.0 8/2/2011 148
2/1/2011 21.0 9/6/2011 148
3/14/2011 22.0 10/3/2011 145
4/1/2011 21.0 11/8/2011 145
5/10/2011 20.0 12/12/2011 148
6/20/2011 22.0 1/24/2012 155
7/5/2011 22.0 2/13/2012 150
8/2/2011 20.0 3/13/2012 152
9/6/2011 21.0 4/9/2012 160
10/3/2011 21.0 5/2/2012 151
11/8/2011 21.0 6/18/2012 138
12/12/2011 21.0 7/9/2012 161
1/24/2012 21.0 8/6/2012 175
2/13/2012 21.0 9/18/2012 172
3/13/2012 22.0 10/22/2012 157
4/9/2012 21.0 11/6/2012 189
5/2/2012 20.0 12/18/2012 170
MW-31
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Date Chloride (mg/1)
6/18/2012 21.6 1/22/2013 176
7/9/2012 21.0 2/19/2013 174
8/6/2012 21.0 3/19/2013 168
9/18/2012 21.0
10/22/2012 18.0
11/6/2012 23.6
12/18/2012 22.2
1/22/2013 22.8
2/19/2013 19.3
3/19/2013 19.1
Under the groundwater sampling progran, accelerated monitoring for nitrate
began in MW-31 prior to when the accelerated monitoring for chloride began.
This difference accounts for the different number of data points represented
above.
Piezometer 1
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 6.8 NA
7/14/2009 6.8 60
9/22/2009 7.3 78
10/27/2009 7.4 61
6/2/2010 7.2 52
7/19/2010 6.8 52
12/10/2010 6.5 60
1/31/2011 7 60
4/25/2011 6.8 58
7/25/2011 7 53
10/19/2011 6.6 55
1/11/2012 7.1 78
4/20/2012 6.6 58
7/27/2012 7.2 56
10/17/2012 7.66 55
2/18/2013 8.11 56.7
Piezometer 2
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.5 NA
7/14/2009 0.5 7
9/22/2009 0.5 17
10/27/2009 0.6 7
6/2/2010 0.6 8
7/19/2010 0.6 8
12/10/2010 0.2 6
1/31/2011 0.3 9
4/25/2011 0.3 8
7/25/2011 0.1 9
10/19/2011 0.1 8
1/11/2012 0.1 9
4/20/2012 0.2 8
7/27/2012 0.2 9
10/17/2012 0.192 9.5
2/19/2013 0.218 9.67
Piezometer 3
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
2/19/2009 0.7 NA
7/14/2009 0.8 12
9/22/2009 0.8 24
10/27/2009 1.2 19
3/24/2010 1.7 116
6/2/2010 1.6 36
7/19/2010 1.6 35
12/10/2010 1.8 25
1/31/2011 1.8 40
4/25/2011 1.7 35
7/25/2011 1.8 61
10/19/2011 1.7 12
1/11/2012 1.8 20
4/20/2012 1.7 53
7/27/2012 1.8 21
10/17/2012 2.75 20.1
2/19/2013 1.85 21
Piezometer 4
Date
7/14/2009
Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1)
1.8 46
Piezometer 5
Date
7/14/2009
Nitrate (mg/1)
0.7
Chloride (mg/1)
18
Upper Wildlife Pond
Date Nitrate (mg/1) Chloride (mg/1) Note
9/22/2009 0 5 Nitrate NO
10/27/2009 0 3 Nitrate NO
6/2/2010 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride NO
7/19/2010 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride NO
12/10/2010 0 1 Nitrate NO
1/31/2011 0.1 1
4/25/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride NO
7/25/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride NO
10/19/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride NO
1/11/2012 0 2 Nitrate ND
Frog Pond
Date
10/14/09
Nitrate (mg/1)
0
Chloride (mg/1)
0
Notes
Nitrate ND
TabK
Concentration Trend Graphs
-I
~~-des
tn t: 0 :.;:::; cu ~~-qe.:J ... .... t: Cl)
(J
t: 0
0
Cl) .... o~-6nv cu ... :!::::: z
'or"'" I z 3: 1-o~-uer
_I 5o-1nr
-j
J eo-~ea
J eo-unr
CX) I'-c.o LO "": ('f) N ~ 0
I
c) c) c) c) 0 c) c) c)
(1J6W) _J
J
~ ~-das
0 c
0 ~
C'G a.. ~ ~-qa.:J ... c CJ)
(J c
0 (.)
CJ)
"C o~-6nv 'i:
0
.c
(.)
~ I z 3: o~-uer 1-
5o-1nr
_I
so-~ a a
_I
J so-unr
1.0 0 1.0 0 1.0 0 N N ~ ~
J (1/BW)
J
~ ~-das
tn c: 0 .. cu ~ ~-qa.::J ... .... c: G)
(.) c: 0
0
G) .... o~-6nv cu ... ~ z
N I z 3: ~ o~-uer
I 5o-1nr
-~
_I
_I
eo<> a a
I
_ _l
eo-unr
_j
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <X) t-(.0 1.0 ""'" ('() N ~
(1/BW)
J
-1
~~-des
tn c
0 +i ca .... ~ ~-qa.::J +' c cu (J c 0
(.)
cu
"C o ~-onv "i:
0
.c:
(.)
N I z 3: o~-uer 1-
6o-1nr
J
so-~ a a
J
I _j so-unr
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
J N 0 CX) CD -.:::t N
~
(lt6w)
J
• I
. l
I
I 5o-1nr
._.)
. ..!
_I
so-~ a a
J so-unr
I
1..0 0 1..0 0 1..0 0 1..0 0 ('() ('() N N
I (1J6W) .__l
J
-l
--1
~ ~-das
tn c: 0 ~ cu a.. ~ ~-qa.::J ..., c:
Q)
0 c: 0
0
Q)
"'C o~-6nv "i:
.2 .c:
0
M I z 3: o~-uer I-
5o-1nr
_.I
eo-~aa
_ _.1
J eo-unr
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
J co <.0 -.;:t N 0 co <.0 '""" N
~
(1J6W)
J
l
-l
~ ~-das
tn
r:::: 0 ;::;
C'G ~ ~-qa~ ... ...,
r::::
C1)
CJ
r::::
0 (.)
C1) ..., o ~-6nv C'G ... ~ z
oq-
I z 3: 1-o~-uer
l 5o-1nr
-J
_ _I
__ I
eo-~ a a
J eo-unr
c.q "": ~ ro <0 -.;t N 0
J c:) c:) c:) c:)
(l/6W)
J
£ ~-ABII\I
--~
I
c~-PO
-l
I
c ~-Jd'v'
~ ~-das
tn
r::::
0 +:. cu .... ~ ~-qa.:J ....,
r::::
(I)
0
r::::
0 0
(I)
"'C "i: o ~-onv 0
.r::::
.. J 0
'lll:t I z ~ 1-o~-uer
. J
I
I 5o-1nr
. J
I
-.I
-_I
so-::> a a
_j
so-unr
0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 J ..q-Ct) Ct) N N
(1/BW)
J
-1
• .l
I I
-· J
. )
••.• 1
I
1 I
-J
I
·.J
<D
c)
I.()
c) N c)
o~-uer
0
tn c
0 ~ cu a.. ..... c
C1)
() c
0 0
C1)
"C "i:
0
~
0
ll)
I z 3: I-
0 <0 0 l() 0 ("t')
(1J6W)
0 N 0
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::J
o ~-onv
o~-uer
tn c: 0
+i ca ... ..., c: C1)
(.) c: 0
0
C1) ..., ca ... ~ z
<D I z 3: 1-
LO
C".i
(1/BW)
LO
0
0
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa~
o~-6nv
o~-uer
6o-1nr
tn s::::
0 ~ C'G ... .... s::::
(I)
(J
s::::
0 0
(I)
"C 'i:
0
.s::::
0
CD I z 3: 1-
0
<X) 0 co 0 I.() 0 ....r-
(1/BW)
0 N
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::J
o ~-6nv
o~-uer
0
tn s::
0 .. ca ... +" s:: (I)
(.) s::
0 (.)
(I) +" ca ... ~ z ......
I z ~ 1-
I.()
N
N
(1/6W)
I.()
c:)
0
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:J
o~-6nv
o~-uer
.--------r-------,--------~------~--------~-------r £~-Ae~
tn ~~-des
c
0 ;; cu .... ... c Cl)
(J c
0 ~ ~-qe.:J ()
Cl)
"C "i:
..2 .c:
()
...... o~-6nv I z 3: 1--
o~-uer
5o-1nr
(1t6w)
0>
c)
....... (.) Q) ....... Q)
0
c 0 z
ro
Q) '-ro
(/) c 0 ~ '-c
Q)
(.) c 0
0
Q) -ro .::. z co I z s 1-
co
c)
<.0
c)
LO
c)
(1J6W)
N
c)
~·
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~.
~ ~
~ .
~ .
~ .
0
~ ~-das
o ~-onv
o~-uer
6o-1nr
so-oaa
..-----,..---r----r----r-------r---,....--.,..---,--__,..---.-£ ~ -Aelf\l
en ~~-des
~ 0 ~ ns a.. .....,
~
(1)
0 ~ ~ ~-qa.::J 0 0
(1)
"C "i:
0
.c 0
co o ~-onv I z 3: 1-
o~-uer
5o-1nr
(1/BW)
o~-uer
N 0
(l/6W)
tn c 0 -.::; cu .... .... c
Cl)
(.) c 0 0
Cl)
"C "i:
0
.c:
0
0')
I z 3: 1-
0 1.0 N
0 0
N
0 1.0
'{"""
(1J6W)
0 0 0 1.0
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa~
o ~-onv
o~-uer
0
tn s:: 0 ;; cu ~ .... s:: Cl)
CJ s:: 0
(.)
Cl) .... cu ~ ~ z
0
~ I z
3: 1-
<X>
0
(1/BW)
c.o 0 N 0
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:J
o ~-onv
o~-uer
0
tn
r:::: 0 ;:: cu L. ....
r::::
CD (.)
r:::: 0
()
CD
"C "i:
0
.r::::
()
0 or-I z 3: 1-
0 (0 0 I.() 0 ('()
(1/6W)
0 N 0
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:J
o ~-onv
o~-uer
6o-1nr
' 1\~
H
~ .......
~~
.H
H
H
~
------~
~ ~
(1/BW)
co
c)
c.o
c)
------~
N c)
~ ~-das
o~-onv
o~-uer
0
tn c
0
+::i ca ... .... c (l)
CJ c
0 0
(l)
"C "i:
0
.J: 0
0 0>
~~
~\
.I
~
1..
~~
0 00
~~
~ ~
~~
~
0 co 0 l{)
(1J6W)
0 ('f) 0 N
£ ~-Aelt\l
~ ~-das
o ~-6nv
o~-uer
0 0
0 c 0 ~ cu .... ..., c Q)
C) c
0
0
Q) ..., cu .... ~ z
N
"'r"'" I z ~ 1-
I.[)
N
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::l
o~-onv
o~-uer
I.[) 0
0
(lt6w)
tn t:
0 .. ~~-des cu a... .....
t:
Cl)
(.)
t:
0 0
Cl) ,
"i:
0 ~ ~-qa.:J .c: 0
N
~ I z 3: 1-
o ~-onv
(l/6W)
co
c:)
(l/6W)
-~
"""'''II
~
~~
v
C\1
c:)
£ ~-Aell\l
•
n
~·
~
~~-des
~
•
o~-uer
5o-1nr
0
0 c
0 ~ cu .... .... c (1)
CJ c
0
(.)
(1)
"C "i:
0
.t:
(.)
M
"'f"""' I z 3: 1-
0 N 0 0 0 CX) 0 <.0
(1/BW)
0
N
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::J
o~-6n~
o~-uer
0
t/)
r:::::
0 :.t:i cu a.. .,
r::::: C1)
CJ
r:::::
0 ()
C1) ., cu a.. :!::::: z
~
~ I z 3: 1-
LO
N
~ ~-das
~~-qa.:J
o ~-onv
o~-uer
N LO 0
0
(1/BW)
en t:
0 +i cu ... .....
t:
(1)
0
t:
0 0
(1)
'0 'i:
..2 .t:
0
~
""" I z ~ 1-
l()
('()
l()
N 0 N
(1/BW)
l() l()
or-
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::J
o ~-6nv
o~-uer
0
tn c
0 :;::; cu ... ... c C1)
(J c 0
0
C1) ... cu ... ~ z
II)
~ I z 3: 1-
1.0
C'\i
N
(1t6w)
1.0
c:)
0
~~-des
~ ~-qe~
o ~-onv
o ~-uer
tn t:
0 .. C'G .... ..... t:
CJ)
(J
t:
0 ()
CJ)
"C ·;:::::
..2 .t:
()
It)
~ I z
3: I-
0 0> 0 CX) 0 (0 0 0 lO "'Q"
(1J6W)
0 N 0
~~-des
~ ~-qa.:J
o ~-onv
o ~-uer
0
fl)
r:::::
0 ~ cu ... .....
r:::::
(I)
0
r:::::
0 (.)
(I) ..... cu ... ~ z
CD
"""'" I z 3: t-
L() L()
N
(1/BW)
N L()
c:)
0
~~-des
~ ~-qa.:J
o~-6nv
o~-uer
tn c 0
~ ca ... .... c
Q)
0 c 0
0
Q)
"'C ·.::::
.2
J:
0
<D or-I z 3: 1-
0 CD 0 lC) 0 ('()
(1/BW)
0 N
~ ~-das
~~-qa.::J
0 ~-6n'v'
o~-uer
0
U) c 0
+::i ~ ~-das cu .... ...., c
(I)
0 c 0 u
(I) ...., cu .... ~ ~ ~-qa.::l z
I'
"C"'" I z 3: t-
o ~-onv
o~-uer
0 co 0
(1J6W)
tn t::
0 +::; cu ... ....
t::
Cl)
(.)
t::
0 0
Cl)
"C "i:
.2 .t::
0
......
~ I z ~ 1-
0 <0 0 0 0 co
(1t6w)
0 <0 0 N
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::J
o ~-onv
o~-uer
0
0
r::::: 0 -.::; cu ... ..,
r:::::
Q)
(.)
r::::: 0 0
Q) .., cu ... :!::::: z
co
~ I z 3: 1-
LO
N
N
(1/BW)
LO
c:)
0
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::J
o~-onv
o~-uer
tn c: 0 +i ns ... .... c:
Cl)
CJ c: 0 0
Cl)
"C "i:
0
.c:
0
co ,..-
I z
3: t-
0 CX) 0 co 0 I.(') 0
C\1
0
~~-des
~ ~-qa.::J
o ~-6nv
o~-uer
r-----~--~~--~----~----~----~----~----~----~£~-Ae~
't I
l~-Jd\{
tn c:: 0
~ ~ ~-das cu '-..... c:: 1 (I)
(.) c:: 0
(.) ~ (I) ..... cu '-:!:::: ~ ~-qa.:f z H
Q)
"""" I ~~ z
3: ~ 1-
0 ~-onv
o~-uer
!----+----+------lr-------1----t-----+-----+----+---+ 60-1nr
<.0 L() N 0
(1J6W)
tn t:
0 +:i cu a.. ..... t:
G)
0
t:
0 0
G)
"C "i:
0
.t:
0
0')
'If"'" I z ~ 1-
c.o N N N 0 N co 0 c.o 0
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa:J
o ~-onv
o~-uer
....... N w .j::. U'1 O'l -....! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7/1/2002
10/1/2002
1/1/2003
4/1/2003
7/1/2003
10/1/2003
1/1/2004
4/1/2004
7/1/2004
10/1/2004
1/1/2005
4/1/2005
7/1/2005
10/1/2005
1/1/2006 ·~ -1 ~ 4/1/2006 ~
7/1/2006 ~~ I ....,a.
10/1/2006
U)
~~ 2 1/1/2007 ~ ;::;:
4/1/2007 .... QJ ,....
7/1/2007 ~ tD
10/1/2007 ~ n
I 0
1/1/2008 ::::s n
4/1/2008 tD
~ ::::s
7/1/2008 ,.... ....
10/1/2008 =-QJ ,.... -· 1/1/2009 0
4/1/2009 I ::::s
"' 7/1/2009
10/1/2009
1/1/2010
4/1/2010
7/1/2010
10/1/2010
1/1/2011
4/1/2011
7/1/2011
10/1/2011
1/1/2012
4/1/2012
7/1/2012
10/1/2012
1/1/2013
N ~ O"l 00 0 0 0 0 0
I I I
12/1/2005
2/1/2006
4/1/2006
6/1/2006
8/1/2006
10/1/2006
12/1/2006
2/1/2007
4/1/2007
6/1/2007
8/1/2007
10/1/2007
12/1/2007
2/1/2008
4/1/2008
6/1/2008
8/1/2008
10/1/2008
12/1/2008
2/1/2009
4/1/2009
6/1/2009
8/1/2009
10/1/2009
12/1/2009
2/1/2010
4/1/2010
6/1/2010
8/1/2010
10/1/2010
12/1/2010
2/1/2011
4/1/2011
6/1/2011
8/1/2011
10/1/2011
12/1/2011
2/1/2012
4/1/2012
6/1/2012
8/1/2012
10/1/2012
12/1/2012
2/1/2013
...... ...... ...... ......
0 N ~ O"l 0 0 0 0
I I I I
......
00 0
-1 :E ~ I ~ U)
n :r -0
::::!. a.
tD
n 0 ::s n
tD ::s r+ ..,
Ql r+ -· 0 ::s
(I)
I-" I-" I-" I-" 0 N .j::::. m 00 0 N .j::::. m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I I
5/1/2005
7/1/2005
9/1/2005
11/1/2005
1/1/2006
3/1/2006
5/1/2006
7/1/2006
9/1/2006
11/1/2006
1/1/2007
3/1/2007
5/1/2007
7/1/2007
9/1/2007
11/1/2007 -I
1/1/2008 =E
3/1/2008 ~ I
5/1/2008 N
~
7/1/2008 z
9/1/2008 -· ,....
11/1/2008
..,
QJ
1/1/2009
,....
tD
3/1/2009 n
5/1/2009 0 ::::s
7/1/2009 n tD
9/1/2009 ::::s ,....
11/1/2009 ..,
QJ
1/1/2010 ,.... -·
3/1/2010 0
::::s
5/1/2010 "' 7/1/2010
9/1/2010
11/1/2010
1/1/2011
3/1/2011
5/1/2011
7/1/2011
9/1/2011
11/1/2011
1/1/2012
3/1/2012
5/1/2012
7/1/2012
9/1/2012
11/1/2012
1/1/2013
I-> I-> N N UJ UJ ~ U1 0 U1 0 U1 0 U1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I I I I I I I 12/1/2005
2/1/2006
4/1/2006
6/1/2006
8/1/2006
10/1/2006
12/1/2006
2/1/2007
4/1/2007
6/1/2007
8/1/2007
10/1/2007
12/1/2007
2/1/2008
4/1/2008 -1
6/1/2008 ~ ~
8/1/2008 I N
10/1/2008 "'""'
12/1/2008 n ~ -2/1/2009 0
4/1/2009 :::::!. c.
6/1/2009 tD
8/1/2009 n 0
10/1/2009 :::s n
12/1/2009 tD :::s
2/1/2010 ,.... ..,
4/1/2010 QJ ,.... -· 6/1/2010 0 :::s
8/1/2010 "' 10/1/2010
12/1/2010
2/1/2011
4/1/2011
6/1/2011
8/1/2011
10/1/2011
12/1/2011
2/1/2012
4/1/2012
6/1/2012
8/1/2012
10/1/2012
12/1/2012
2/1/2013
I-' 0 0
2/28/2007
4/30/2007
6/30/2007
8/31/2007
10/31/2007
12/31/2007
2/29/2008
4/30/2008
6/30/2008
8/31/2008
10/31/2008
12/31/2008
2/28/2009
4/30/2009
6/30/2009
8/31/2009
10/31/2009
12/31/2009
2/28/2010
4/30/2010
6/30/2010
8/31/2010
10/31/2010
12/31/2010
2/28/2011
4/30/2011
6/30/2011
8/31/2011
10/31/2011
12/31/2011
2/29/2012
4/30/2012
6/30/2012
8/31/2012
10/31/2012
12/31/2012
N 0 w 0
mg/L
+::-0 V1 0 0"1 0 -.....! 0
-1 ~ ~ I N
N z ;:;.·
al ,...
tD
n 0 :::J n tD
:::J ,...
o.llll D) ,... -· 0
:::J
V)
V) r:::: 0 +i ~ ~ r:::: Q) u r::::
0 u
Q)
"C "i:
0
.r:::: u
N N I -=:~" ~ .....
0 1..()
1..()
("() 0 ("()
1..()
N
1/~W
0 N
1..() 0
6/27/2007
8/27/2007
10/27/2007
12/27/2007
2/27/2008
4/27/2008
6/27/2008
8/27/2008
10/27/2008
12/27/2008
2/27/2009
4/27/2009
6/27/2009
8/27/2009
10/27/2009
12/27/2009
2/27/2010
4/27/2010
6/27/2010
8/27/2010
10/27/2010
12/27/2010
2/27/2011
4/27/2011
6/27/2011
8/27/2011
10/27/2011
12/27/2011
2/27/2012
4/27/2012
6/27/2012
8/27/2012
10/27/2012
12/27/2012
0
N 0 0
~ 0 0
en 0 0
mg/L
00 0 0
...... 0 0 0
...... N 0 0
...... ~ 0 0
-1 ~ .r::. I N .r::.
n :::r -0
::::!. c.
tD
n 0 :::s n tD :::s r+ ..,
OJ r+ -· 0 :::s
V)
V) c: 0 ·-+"' n:J '-+"' c:
Q) u c: 0 u
Q)
+"' n:J '-~~ z
Ln
N I -.::t s 1-
6/27/2007
8/27/2007
10/27/2007
12/27/2007
2/27/2008
4/27/2008
6/27/2008
8/27/2008
10/27/2008
12/27/2008
2/27/2009
4/27/2009
6/27/2009
8/27/2009
10/27/2009
12/27/2009
2/27/2010
4/27/2010
6/27/2010
8/27/2010
10/27/2010
12/27/2010
2/27/2011
4/27/2011
6/27/2011
8/27/2011
10/27/2011
12/27/2011
2/27/2012
4/27/2012
6/27/2012
8/27/2012
10/27/2012
12/27/2012
0 U1 0
~ 0 0
~ U1 0
N 0 0
mg/L
N U1 0
w 0 0
w U1 0
+:> 0 0
+:> U1 0
-t ~ ~ I N
U1
n ::r -0
:::!. a.
tD
n 0 ::s n tD ::s r-to .,
OJ r-to -· 0 ::s
V)
(j)
c:)
co
c:)
CD
c:)
LO
c:)
(1/BW)
N
c:)
~~
0
5o-1nr
tn c 0 .. cu ... ..., c CD C) c 0
0
CD
"C •t:
0
.c:
0
co
"'C""" I ~ :E
•
6o-1nr
6o-1nr
6o-1nr
6o-1nr
6o-1nr
!------+-----+-----+----+-----+-----+ 6o-1nr
0 <0 0 LO 0 ('()
(1/BW)
0 N 0
U) c:
0 +i cu ... .... c:
Cl)
(.) c:
0 0
Cl) .... cu ... ::: z
en
~ I ~ :E
• 5o-1nr
5o-1nr
5o-1nr
5o-1nr
5o-1nr
!-------+--------~------+-------+-----+ 5o-1nr
L{)
N
(1J6W)
L{)
c:i
0
tn
r:::::
0 +:i C'G ... .....
r::::: Cl)
CJ
r::::: 0
(.)
Cl)
"C 'i:
0
.s:: (.)
<»
"'f"" I 3: :IE
• 5o-1nr
5o-1nr
5o-1nr
5o-1nr
6o-1nr
!------+-----+-----+----+------+----+ 6o-1nr
0 ('()
L()
C'\1 0 C'\1
L()
(1/BW)
0 L() 0
f-' f-' N N
0 V1 0 V1 0 V1
0 0 0 0 0 0
' I ' I
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007 i I I I I I s
3/1/2008 1 I I ~ I I :E I w
6/1/2008 1
I I I / I I
0
9/1/2008 2 ;:;.· ..,
12/1/2008 1 I I II I I QJ r+
3/1/2009 1 I I II I I tD
n
6/1/2009 1 I I ~·~ I I 0 :::s n
9/1/2009 1 I I t I tD :::s
12/1/2009 1 I I 1\ I I r+ ..,
QJ
3/1/2010 1 I I I I I I r+ -· 0
6/1/2010 l I I I~ I I
:::s
"' 9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
N 0 0
' I
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
-!:::> 0 en 0 00 0
...... 0 0
......
N
0
...... -!:::> 0
...... en 0
...... 00 0
s
~ I w 0
n ::r -0 .., -· c..
tD
n 0 ::l n
tD
::l r+ ..,
Q)
r+ -· 0
::l
"'
...... ...... N N w w 0 Ln 0 Ln 0 Ln 0 Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007 i I I I I 1 I I s
3/1/2008 1 I I I I ~ I I ~ I w
6/1/2008 ~ I I I I I ~I I
.....
9/1/2008 2 -· ....
'""" 12/1/2008 1 I I I I 1 ~1 I OJ ....
3/1/2009 1 I I I I I I I I tD
n
6/1/2009 1 I I I ~ I I I 0 ::s n
9/1/2009 1 I l I ~ I I I tD ::s
12/1/2009 1 I I I I I I I I ....
'""" OJ
3/1/2010 1 I I I I \.. I I I .... -· 0
6/1/2010 l I I I I ~ I I I
::s
V)
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
N +:>. O"'l 00 0 0 0 0 0
I I I I I
6/1/2005
9/1/2005
12/1/2005
3/1/2006
6/1/2006
9/1/2006
12/1/2006
3/1/2007
6/1/2007
9/1/2007
12/1/2007
3/1/2008
6/1/2008
9/1/2008
12/1/2008
3/1/2009
6/1/2009
9/1/2009
12/1/2009
3/1/2010
6/1/2010
9/1/2010
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
6/1/2011
9/1/2011
12/1/2011
3/1/2012
6/1/2012
9/1/2012
12/1/2012
3/1/2013
...... ...... ...... 0 N +:>. 0 0 0
I I I
...... O"'l 0
...... 00 0
N 0 0
s
~ I w
~
n :::r -0
:::::!. c.
tD
n 0
::::s n tD
::::s r+ ..,
QJ r+ -· 0
::::s
"'
~----~----~--------~-----,----~----~----~----~£~-Ae~
~~-des
0
s::::::
0 :.;::; cu ... ...,
s:::::: Cl) ~ ~-qa.:J (.)
s::::::
0 0
Cl) ..., cu ...
:!::::: o ~-6n'v' z
"'f""" ...
Cl) ...,
Cl)
E 0 N o~-uer Cl) a:
(1/BW)
0 c
0 +::i
C'G a.. ....., c
Q)
(,) c
0 0
Q)
"C "i:
0
.s:::::
0
~
a..
Q) .....,
Q)
E
0 N -~ a..
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:J
o~-6nv
o~-uer
5o-1nr
r-----~----~-----+------r-----+-----~-----+----~------+90-~aa
0 Q') 0 CX) 0 <0 0 0
L() """"
(l/6W)
0
C\1
0 0
tJ)
r:::: 0 +i cu .... ..... r::::
Cl)
(.)
r:::: 0
(.)
Cl) ..... cu .... ~ z
N ....
Cl) ..... Cl)
E
0 N Cl) a:
LO
c)
(1/BW)
N
c) 0
~~-des
~~-qa.:J
o ~-Bnv
o~-uer
so-oaa
tn c: 0 .. f! ... c:
C1)
0 c: 0 (.)
C1)
"C "i:
0
.c:
(.)
N
~ s C1)
E 0 N .! a..
....
I ~
~
~
~
~
~
~~
T
-+
(1/BW)
~~-des
~ ~-qa.:l
~
o ~-6nv
o~-uer
eo-1nr
so<> a a
<0 0
~ ~-das
tn £: 0 +:. cu a... ...,
£: Cl) ~ ~-qa.::J 0
£:
0
0
Cl) ..., cu a... :!:::: o ~-onv z
M
a... Cl) ...,
Cl)
E 0 N o~-uer Cl) a:
(1/BW)
tn t: ~ ~-das 0 +::; cu ... .... t: Cl)
(J
t:
0 0
Cl) ~ ~'-qa.::J
"C "i:
0
J: 0
M ...
Cl) o ~-onv .... Cl)
E
0 N .! a..
o~-uer
tn c
0 +l
f.! .....,
c Cl)
(.) c
0 0 s
f.! :!:::: z
~ ... s Cl)
E 0 N Cl) a:
ao-1nr
ao-1nr
ao-1nr
ao-1nr
ao-1nr
ao-1nr
ao-1nr
1----!----+---+----1---+---+---+---+---+---+ ao-1nr
(1J6W)
ex:> c) co
c)
0
tn c
0 +:3 l! .....,
c Cl)
(J c
0 (.)
Cl)
"C "i:
.2 .c
(.)
'lilt ... s Cl)
E
0 N Cl)
a:::
•
6o-1nr
6o-1nr
6o-1nr
6o-1nr
1----+---+---+-----t----+----+---+----+---+---+ 6o-1nr
0 1.0 0 1.0 ('() N
(1J6W)
0 N 0
tn r::::: 0 ..
C'G .... ~ r::::: (J)
CJ r::::: 0
0
(J) ~ C'G .... :!: z
It) ....
(J) ~ (J)
E 0 N .!!! a..
6o-1nr
6o-1nr
6o-1nr
6o-1nr
6o-1nr
6o-1nr
!------+----+----+----+---+-----+----+---+ 6o-1nr
ex:>
c::)
co
c::)
LO
c::) ~ 0
(1J6W)
N c::)
0
tn c
0 += CG ... ..... c
Cl)
(J c
0 0
Cl)
"'C "i:
.2 .c
0
II) ... Cl) ..... Cl)
E 0 N Cl) a:
5o-1nr
5o-1nr
5o-1nr
5o-1nr
5o-1nr
t----r---+----+---+---t----r---+----+---+----+-6o-1nr
0 C'\1
(1/BW)
co C'\1 0
0
s::::: 0
+:i f! .....
s::::: Q).
0
s::::: 0
0
Q) ..... f! ~ z
'tl
s::::: 0 a..
~
"C
~
4~ ~
co 0
c)
0
0
~~
~ ~~
~
""'" 0
0
N 0
c)
...... ,
~~
~~
~~
~~
0
~~-des
~ ~-unr
0 ~-/\ON
o~-6nv
o ~-AeV\1
o~-uer
60-PO
~ ~-oaa
~ ~-das
tn
s:::: ~ ~-unr 0 ..
C'G r-......
s:::: C1)
CJ
s:::: 0 ~ ~-qa.::J
(.)
C1)
"C "i:
0
.s::.
(.) 0 ~-AON
"C
s:::: 0
0..
~
"C o ~-onv
§
r-C1) c. c. => o~-J\eV\1
o~-uer
60-PO
c.o 1.0 ('() N 0
(1/BW)
tn s::::
0 +i f.! .....
s:::: CD (,)
s::::
0 0 s f.! ~ z
"C s::::
0 a.
C)
0 .... u..
0)
0
co
0
<.0
0
('I')
0 C'\1 0
~~
0
6Q-AON
60-PO
6o-das
6Q-das
6o-onv
6o-1nr
60-1nr
Ul s::::
0 +i f! ..... s:::: (I)
()
s::::
0 0
(I)
"C "i:
..2 .s:::: 0
"C s::::
0 a.
C) e
LL
0'>
c:i
CX)
c:i
<0
c:i
1.0
0
(1J6W)
N
c:i
0
0
c:i
6Q-AON
60-PO
6o-das
6o-das
6Q-6nv
TabL
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Thursday, May 23, 2013 8:48 AM
•rlundberg@ utah.gov•
•Phillip Goble•; Thomas Rushing•; •Dean Henderson•; Harold Roberts; David Frydenlund; Jo
Ann Tischler; Jaime Massey; David Turk; Garrin Palmer; N. Tanner Holliday; Dan Hillsten
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2013 01 Nitrate Monitoring
1302338-EDD-rev1.csv
Attached to this e-mail are electronic copies of laboratory results for nitrate monitoring conducted at the White Mesa
Mill during the first quarter of 2013, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
1