DRC-2013-001287 - 0901a0688034e71a

ENERGYFUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
xnergyfuels.com
Febraary 18, 2013
VIA PDF AND FEDERAL EXPRESS
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Director of the Utah Division of Radiation Control
State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850 A
Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4850 "'-Q«2013"00 1
Re: State of Utah Ground Water Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
White Mesa Uranium Mill - Removal of Certain Groundwater Monitoring Parameters
from Accelerated Monitoring Status
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
A number of groundwater monitoring constituents have been placed on accelerated monitoring status
under Part I.G.1 of the Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. ("EFRP') Ground Water Discharge Permit No.
UGW370004 ("GWDP"). Part I.G.1 provides that such accelerated monitoring shall continue until
compliance status of the facility can be determined by the Director.
Based on the accelerated monitoring results to date, EFRI requests the Director make a determination that
accelerated monitoring cease at this time for sulfate in MW-27, uranium in MW-30, and gross alpha
minus Rn and U ("gross alpha") in MW-2 for the reasons stated below:
• MW-27 sulfate results have been below the Groundwater Compliance Limit ("GWCL")
specified in the GWDP for ten consecutive sampling events since Q3 2010. Per the UDEQ
letters of May 30, 2006, October 31, 2011 and April 25, 2012, eight consecutive sample results
below the GWCL are needed for the discontinuance of accelerated monitoring.
• MW-30 uranium results have been below the GWCL specified in the GWDP for nine
consecutive sampling events since April 2012. Per the UDEQ letters of May 30, 2006, October
31, 2011 and April 25, 2012, eight consecutive sample results below the GWCL are needed for
the discontinuance of accelerated monitoring.
• MW-02 gross alpha results have been below the GWCL specified in the GWDP for eight
consecutive sampling events since Ql 2011. Per the UDEQ letters of May 30, 2006, October 31,
2011 and April 25, 2012, eight consecutive sample results below the GWCL are needed for the
discontinuance of accelerated monitoring.
Once removed from accelerated monitoring status, these constituents, like all other constituents, would be
subject to future accelerated monitoring under Part I.G.1 of the GWDP, should circumstances warrant.
To assist in your evaluation of the foregoing, we have included a sununary of the accelerated sampling
results since the initial sample result that triggered accelerated monitoring.
Letter to Rusty Lundberg
Removal of Parameters from Accelerated Monitoring
February 18, 2013
Page 2
WeUID Constituent GWCL Sample Date Sample Result (ug/L)
MW-27 Sulfate (mg/L) 462 2°''Quarter 2010* 469
3'** Quarter 2010 461
4"^ Quarter 2010 452
Quarter 2011 455
2°''Quarter 2011 442
3'''Quarter 2011 424
4"^ Quarter 2011 456
Quarter 2012 451
2"'* Quarter 2012 446
3'" Quarter 2012 453
4"* Quarter 2012 451
MW-30 Uranium (ug/L) 8.32 March 2012* 8.38
April 2012 7.84
2"^^ Quarter 2012 6.81
June 2012 7.80
3'*^ Quarter 2012 7.64
August 2012 8.04
September 2012 7.67
October 2012 7.86
4* Quarter 2012 7.03
December 2012 5.80
MW-02 Gross Alpha 3.2 4"* Quarter 2010* 3.5
Minus Rn and U Quarter 2011 1.1
(pCi/L) 2°" Quarter 2011 1.2
3'''Quarter 2011 0.5
4"^ Quarter 2011 1.3
Quarter 2012 0.6
2°'" Quarter 2012 0.6
3'^ Quarter 2012 0.9
4"^ Quarter 2012 1.46
*Last sample result outside of GWCL limits.
The analytical laboratory reports for the foregoing results up to and including September 2012 are
included in the Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Reports, all of which have been provided to DRC.
Copies of the analytical laboratory reports and the field sheets for the results for October 2012 through
December 2012 will be provided in the upcoming 4th Quarter 2012 Groundwater Monitoring Report and
are also included with this letter for your convenience. It is important to note that the 4th Quarter 2012
monitoring results included with this letter have been evaluated per the DRC approved QAP and the
GWDP and all field and laboratory quality control parameters are acceptable. The evaluations of the 4th
Quarter data will be included in the 4th Quarter 2012 Groundwater Monitoring Report, due March 1,
2013.
Letter to Rusty Lundberg
Removal of Parameters from Accelerated Monitoring
February 18,2013
Page 3
If you have any questions or require any further information, please contact the undersigned.
Yours truly,
^io Ann Tischler
Manager, Compliance and Licensing
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Harold Roberts
Dan Hillsten
David Turk
Katherine Weinel
Boaernms
MiU - Groundvtrater Discharge Pern^ft
Groundwater Manttonrig Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Dale: 6/06/2012 Rev 7
DEhflSO MINSS
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WmTE MESA URANil M MILL
_ FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event. Hf^ (^u^grW 6-r<3urici ^^jc^'^cr J.o'^^
SeemstrucuoB
Location (well name)- j^\j^-X7
Field Sample ID
Sampler NanK
and initials: 1 Tftnt^ Holi<ci«^^A><
Date and Time for Purging | i\/l3/2JU\
Well Purging Equip Used: £S
Piirguig Method Used.
pump or • bailer
03 2 casings • .^casines
Sampling E\ em | Semig^nnvAtf.] G-v)
pH Buffer 7 n 7.D
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if other dian Beimet)
Pre\. Well Sampled in Sampling Event
pH ButTer 4 0
specific Conduciaiice C{q\ ^MHOS'cLn Well DepA(0.01 ft)' ^S.OO
Dcptli to \^'ater Before Purging [_^| 70 Casing Volume {V) r Well:
r Well
Condaetance (avg)
Well Water Temp, (avg)
Weaiher Cond
(.653h)
(J67h)
pH of Water (avg)
Redox Poietitial (Eh)| i\<\i Inxbidity O
s Ext'l Amb. Temp. 'C (prior sampling e\^nt)
Time | j'^oo
Conduct cuice
Temp.
Gal. Pttrged j SI -^'0
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Ttiitidit>^(NTU)
Time GaL Purged {57.7a
Coitductance
Temp °C
1^63
Redox Potential Eh (mV) { c,c>:2^
Turbidity (NTU)
Time ( 130X Gal Purged | ^1^^^
Conductance
Temp. T
RedoK Poiemial Eh (mV>
Turbidit> (NTU)
Ml
Time | )S0'^ Gal. Purged | SS.)3 1
Coaduciance \(aOi( 1 PH{C.^9
Temp.T
Re4ox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity- (NTU) O
White Mesd Milt
FteW Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ml!) - Groundwater Discharge Permit
Graurtdwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Date 6/06/2012 Rev 7
Voliuiie of Water Purged | b>%
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S'60 =
gal{on(s)
Time to evacuate mo casmg volumes (2V)
T = 2V7Q={ a^^<^
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other ilian two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
o
]
Name of Certified .Ajulylical Laboratory if Other Th^n Energ\ Labs | AWAL
Type of Sample Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
If otliei tluin as
specified bclou)
Filtered Prcserv attv e Tvpc Preservative Added Type of Sample
N
Sample Vol (indicate
If otliei tluin as
specified bclou) Y
Prcserv attv e Tvpc
Y N
\'0C5> m • .^x4(i nii • m HCL m O
NutTJCUtS m 0 1 Oft ml • H2S04 53 o Heavv Metals O 250 ml • HNO^ •
A.}! Oifier Nan Radtologjcs • 250 ml D No Preserv • m Gross -Mpha m • LO<M) mi IS • HNO.^ o either {spccifv')
• Sample volume m •
If pres*jivalivtj is used, sjpecity
Type and Quantity of Presavattv^-
Final Depth | hP-Ap
iC'omment
Sample Time | )30^
See instruction
Arr,v)ea. Gr\ s>Xe txV Cg30 "H^nner ^^^^i^ pre^A+ -tor p^^e anA Sc^mphnA ev;e»^t.
j clcckc V^r^ cnAei &r\k <>cxrv\ple3 cojlec^-ri a"^ nC5. te-^'-^ ^+
Do not totich this cell (SlieetNanie)
White Mesa Mitl
field Data Worksheet for Gioundwater 2 of.
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
ANAlYTICfll IADORATORIE3
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-005
CUent Sample ID: /MW^l 1132012
CoUection Date: 11/13/2012 1305h
Received Date: 11/16/2012 0940h
Analytical Results
Contact: Garrin Pahner
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
463 West 3600 South Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual 463 West 3600 South Compound Prepared Analyzed Result Qual
salt Lake City, UT 84115 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 11/20/2012 1023h 11/20/2012 1817ti E350.1 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 11/19/2012 0643h SM2320B 1.00 370
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 11/19/2012 0643h SM2320B 1.00 <1.00
Phone: [phone]
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L
10.0 44.2 Phone: [phone]
Chloride mg/L 11/26/2012 1607h E300 0 10.0 44.2
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride
mg/L
0.100 Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 11/21/2012 1542h E300.0 0.100 0.587
Fax: [phone] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
mg/L
Fax: [phone] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 11/16/2012 1707h E353.2 1.00 6.90 ;-mail: [e-mail]
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L
m? ;-mail: [e-mail]
mg/L 11/21/2012 0837h E300.0 100 m?
web: www.awal-labs.com Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11/16/2012 1240h SM2540C 20.0 1,070
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA OfBcer
Report Date: 11/29/2012 Page 11 of 37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Petttnent sampling mfoimation ts located on the attached COC This report is provided for die exclusive use of the addressee Pnvileges of
Mill - Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Date: 6/06/2012 Rev 7 2
OENISO MINES
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
See instrucuon
Description of SampUng Event: | Q^+ok>er qoig 6'rQVA.n<Av>J^'^er
Location (well name): | /AVv}" 30^10 »
Field Sample ID
Sampler Name
and initials: "T^nngr HoUi^'Mi/'l^
M\A)-SQ^10332.0I^
Date and Time for Purging j \0/33/:3>oia.
Well Purging Equip Used: IS pump or | • | bailer
Purging Method Used: 19 2 casings | • |3 casings
Sampling Event MQIA-H\|^ (jr vf
pH Buffer 7.0 -7,0
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if oUier than Bennet)
Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event
pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance liMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging j "7$. 50
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well
3" Well:
110.00
(.653h)
(.367h)
Conductance (avg)
Well Water Temp, (avg) llH-^^
Weather Cond
pH of Water (avg) | C>7R
Redox Potential (Eh) Turbidity ^
Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)
Time J0£C> Gal. Purged | M7.7H
Conductance
Temp. °C
pH GHH
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged
Conductance
Temp. °C
pH| fc.7^
Redox Potential Eh (mV) \ g,] S
Turbidity (NTU)
Time | \oaZ. 1 Gal. Purged \ H^.)7 1
Conductance | a04,g H pH j (>.gP H
Temp. °C
Redox Potential Eh (mV) | aiM
Turbidity (NTU) j 0
Time | ]OCl'Z | Gal. Purged I
Conductance | 3>04S ] pH | G.S3 1
Temp.X I 1M.57 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) f^jM
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill - Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Date. 6/06/2012 Rev. 7 2
Volume of Water Purged IHjf-^
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 =
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q= XQ-y,
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs |AWM~ (j-E^
Type of Sample Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
if other than as
specified below)
Filtered Preservative Type Preservative Added Type of Sample
Y N
Sample Vol (indicate
if other than as
specified below) Y N
Preservative Type
Y N
VOCs • • 3x40 ml • • HCL • •
Nutrients • 100 ml • H2S04 •
Heavy Metals SI • 250 ml • HN03 •
All Other Non Radiologics • • 250 ml • • No E*reserv. • •
Gross Alpha • • 1,000 ml • • HN03 • •
Other (specify) • Sample volume • •
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth | "7S'^\ Sample Time lOjZ^
See instmction
Comment
U)«.V K^as. clear-. PuLf^C crsAA a:r^^ ^t^vAp)^ CoWtiC^'^d ^ l^^S,
ID36
MW-30 10-23-2012 Do not touch tiiis cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - [phone] - www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa MUl GW
Report Date: January 31,2013
Client Sample ID: (MW^O? 10232012
Lab Sample ID: 313984005
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Ground Water
23-OCT-12 10:25
25-OCT-12
Client
Proiect: DNMIOOlOO
Client ID: DNMlOOl
Client SDG: 313984
'arameter Qualifler Result SRL CRDL Units OF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
ietals Analysis-lCP-MS
00 2/200 8 Selenium "As Received"
elenium
ranium
45.2
[ZSSJ
The following Prep Methods were performed
EPA 200.8
EPA 200 8
5 00 5 00 ug/L 1 SKJ 11/08/12 03.44 1258592 1
0.300 0.300 ug/L 1 SKJ 11/08/12 13.36 1258592 2
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
iPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 11/01/12 0755 1258591
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
s the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the cRDL.
Mill - Gr-•^u^dwatef Discharge Permit
Grounckvater Monctonng Quality Assurance Plan {QAP)
Date 6/06/2012 Rev 7
ATTACHMENT 1-2
W KITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Samphng E\ cnf ^TH Q^^rW (froun^v^'^^^^ ^'^^'^
MINES
J^" Sec in<^tnjcttoa
Location (v^ell uame), | /v^^~3D
Field Sample ID
Sampler Name ^
and initials. ^nngr tit>H»'i^«^/nf
Date and Time for Purging | \\f'{^/0M2, \ and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: 113 [pump or bailer Well Pimip (if odier tlian Bennet) | (^^D
Purging Method Used: | [2 casings ^ casings
Sjmipluig Event | 5efv\'VnnUt\.i (rV^
pH Buffer 7 n
Prev. V^''ell Sampled in Sampling Event
pH Buffer 4 0
Specific Conductance pMHOS' cm WellDepthtO.Olft)- | /IQ.oC
Depth to Water Before Purging { '/^ Casing Volume (V) 4" Welt:
3" Well:
(.653h)
(J67h)
Conductance (avg)
Well ater Temp, (avg)
Weatlier Cond
pH of Water (av g> | Q .S 4
RedoK Potenfijil (Eh)[ ^ %1 Turbidity
Ext't Amb. Temp. 'C (prior sampling events O"
Time
Conduaance
Temp.
Gal Puigcd I 44
Redo.ic Potential Eli (m V) { tj j(Q
Torbtdity(NTlJ)
Time
Couductance
Temp. T
Gal. Purged HH. 70
pH I QSl
Redox Pmential Eh (mV) |4g-%
Turbidity (NTU)
Tmie 113*7 Gal. Purged j H4.^l
Conductance '^^'ix. pH ((^.^Z.
Temp-''C j^iO
Redox PoteiUiai Eli (m\') ^ f
Turbidity (NTU) o
t I Gal. Piirged } i^SJ^
Conductance [ XOSTj { pH j 4.^7
Temp { H
Redox Potential Eh (mV) { q^j^j
Turbidity (NTU) O
White Mesa Mil!
Mill Gr«undwater Discharge Permit
Groundwat'er Wonitorng Quaftty Assurance Plan (QAP/
Date 6/06/2012 Rev 7
Volume of Wafer Purged | 45. S 7
Pmnping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S'60 =
gallon(s)
•211
Tunc to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V.'Q=[_2QLia
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if oilier tlian two)
If well evacuaied to dr>Tiess. number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified .Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs | AWAl /rHU
T\ pc of Sample Sample Taken Sample \ ol t indicate
ffotJicr than as
specified below)
Filtered Preservative Type Preservative Added T\ pc of Sample
Y K
Sample \ ol t indicate
ffotJicr than as
specified below) Y K
Preservative Type
Y N
\OCs Q >x4t) ml • m HCL O
Nuuiems B • O m H2S04 m o Heav^ Metals m • 250 ml m a HN03 a AH OiJiet Non Radiologics m • 250 ml o IS No Presen-a Gross Alpha m 1 MO ml m • HN03 m o Other tspcci{\') m • Sample volume D o m
If pteservalive is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preseivattve-
Final Deptfi | 'f^MO Sample Tune ||45
See insiruction
ICommefit
f\rr^ve\ oA ^.'-hiccV Ci^O-i. ^AiO/itrr He>iii4AM^ pr-C,SeA^~ pv^C^«- ^/^p^"^ ei/e/?f:
l^leiXC, P^rc^c ^f\^e^ ^^rvipieii CGllec^^crA a+ H40, Le-ft .-^iic H^^^
Do not touch this cell (SheetNiune)
White Mesa M.ll
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - [phone] - www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa MUl GW
Report Date: February 5,2013
Client Sample ID: (MW-3(y 11132012
Lab Sample ID: 315400008
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Ground Water
13-NOV-12 11:40
16-NOV-12
Client
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
DNMIOOlOO
DNMIOOl
315400
Parameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units OF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
vlercury Analysis-CVAA
i:PA 245 Mercury "As Received"
vlercury U ND 0.500 0 500 ug/L 1 BYVl 12/03/12 11:14 1267206 1
vietals Analysis-ICP
m. 7/200 2 TAL "As Received"
Dalcium 266000 500 500 ug/L 1 LS 12/06/12 12.19 1264523 2
Dhromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 1
:obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron 49.2 30.0 30.0 ugfL 1
vfagnesium 70600 500 500 ugA. 1
vlanganese 25.4 10 0 10.0 ug/L 1
vlolybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
•Jickel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
/anadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ugfL 1
;inc u ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
^otassium 6600 500 500 ug/L 1 JWJ 12/06/12 21-22 1264523 5
iodium 105000 500 500 ug/L 1
vf etals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200 2 TAL "As Received"
Vrsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L 1 RMJ 11/23/12 17.26 1264520 6
beryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1
Cadmium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1
.ead U ND 1 00 1.00 ug/L 1
ielenium 36.0 5.00 5.00 ug/L 1
rhallium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1
^raniuffi) (T037 0.300 0.300 ug/L 1
iilver U ND 10.0 100 ug/L 1 SKJ 01/03/13 22.59 1272955 7
Zopper U ND 10.0 10.0 ng/L 1 SKJ 01/04/13 17.17 1272955 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
SPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 11/20/12 0630 1264518
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28/12 1130 1272954
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200 2 Liquid Prep AXG2 11/20/12 0630 1264522
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep MTMl 12/06/12 1330 1268683
EPA 245.1/245.2 Prep EPA 245 Mercury AXS5 11/30/12 1551 1267205
U&i - Groundwater 0isd>arge Permit
Groundwater Mooftor^ne Quality A$suf3nc« Pint* (QAP)
Date 6/06/2012 8ev. 7
OENISO MINES
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE IVIESA URANIUM S^ttLL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
S« insmictico
^ Sampler KaiiK ^
Location (well nante): f AA U^^JSO
Field Sample S>
and lultials:
Date and Time for Purgaig
Weil Pm-gajg Equip Used: [ p [pump or |D [ bailer
Purging Method Used: 0 2 casings D 3 casings
Sampling Event ^A^tf^>vfUly /yU>
and Sampling (if differ^t)
' Well Pamp (if other than Bennet)
Prev. Welt Sampled in Sampling Event
pH Buffer 4.0 | L} /•)
specific Conductance
Etepth to Water Before Purging "75 ,^5
pMROSf cm Well Dej^h(O.01Ii):
Casing Vohmie (V) 4" Well
3**Well
22I22c653h)
/7 p^m
Conductance (avg)
Well Water Temp, (avg)
Weatlier Coitd.
pH of Water (avg)
Redox Potetrtial (Eh)} !^i^O Turbidity(~^
£xt1 Amb. Temp, X (prior sampling events ~" ^
Time
Conductance
Temp.-**C
GaL Purged t HS. 7^
Redox Potential Eh <mV) | 35^1 1
TuibidityCNTU) n 1
Time
Conductance
Temp.X
GaL Pitrged } ^j^^j^
Redox Potential ^ (mV) j 3 uij;
Tm-btdity (NTU)
'Tittte 1 HPS GaJ. Purged | H£, 2J1
Condi^ctance
Temp. ""C
RedOK Potential Eh (mV> [
Turbidity <KTU>
337 1
I., 0
Time f HQM t Gal.Purged \ U^.^'-^ \
CottduOMCe I I PH| t
Temp. ''C
Redox Potential B[i <m\0 (
Turbidity (NTU) f^ •
White Mesa Mill
Fidd Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 crf2
Mill-'Ofbuntfyyater Discharge P«rnift ~
eround^er Montwring Quality Assurance Pfart [Qfi^)
Date. 6/06/2012 Rev. T:
Volume of Water Ptitged i
Pnippkg Rate C^icalatioti
Flow Rate (Q>j%i ^m. Time to evacuatfe two casmg volumes (2V)
Namber of erasing volumes evacil^cl (if othfr thai* two)
Nam«:,of Certified Analytical Laboratoiy if Otiier than Umtgy La(>s | :\>a/A
TypeofSamiile
SarnpJe Vol (indicate
if other than as
specified below)
Flitted. , Prei^rvativ^ Type Presm ative Added TypeofSamiile
SarnpJe Vol (indicate
if other than as
specified below)
Prei^rvativ^ Type
Y ' N
VOCs Hct ; : , Q
Ntitriepts m Heav^M^!$ r . a All Otlier NOB RadioJi^cs No Preserve D
Gross Alpha r^ooomi; . HN03 '
Other C^cify) SjQijpte vo!mn€f
tf presetvaifve is used, ^peciiy
Type atid (Quantity df Pt^servative:
IComment
Sainpte Time t i\(sk
i See itiSorpcUon
too riot touch te cell (SheetName)
Whj|?M?3aMilt
Field Data Worksheet for GrtnjtiiJwater 2 of2
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - [phone] - www.gel com
Certificate of Analysis
Company
Address •
Contact:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Report Date: February 5, 2013
Client Sample ID: W^f^ 12262012
Lab Sample ID: 317317004
Matrix:
Collect Date: Receive Date:
Collector:
Ground Water
26-DEC-12 11:05
28-DEC-12
Client
Proiect: DNMIOOlOO
Client ID: DNMIOOl
Client SDG: 317317
'arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
vietals Analysis-ICP-MS
m.2/200 8 Selenium "As Received"
Jelenium 31.6
Qramum? OOv"
5.00
0.300
5.00 ug/L 1 RMJ 01/04/13 03:04 1273044 1
0.300 ug/L 1
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP BXAl 12/31/12 0200 1273043
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Comments
EPA 200.8
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
Mill - Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Date 6/06/2012 Rev. 7 2
DENISO
MINES
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
See instruction
Description of SampUng Event: Qu^ftrt^r Grovxn^XjQgci'ef SsPlZ.
Location (well name):
Field Sample ID
Sampler Name
and initials: I "l^ner tio|l'<l<d/T^
Date and Time for Purging | \\/Xl/'2S>\'Z.
Well Purging Equip Used: pump or [ • | bailer
Purging Method Used: W] 2 casings [ • |3 casings
Samphng Event | ^r.rA\(Kf\n\soS 6-W
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event
pH Buffer 4.0
specific Conductance ^MHOS/cm Well Depth(O.Olft): | \Z.ti,%0
Depth to Water Before Purging 10^. SS Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:
3" Well:
1^.-2)7 (.653h)
(.367h)
Conductance (avg) 377^ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp, (avg) | 13,^7
Weather Cond.
Redox Potential (Eh)| 13 Turbidity
Ext'l Amb. Temp. "C (prior sampling event) O
Time
Conductance
Temp. °C
Qg^O I Gal. Purged [^HT^
pH
ll>.50
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU) ]
Time
Conductance "jHlL
Gal. Purged | ^5 J7
pH
Temp. °C
Redox Potential Eh (mV) |
Turbidity (NTU)
Time |
Conductance
Temp. °C
"377S
Gal. Purged
I pH
Redox Potential Eh (mV) | SN
Turbidity (NTU)
Time |Qg.b3 1 Gal. Purged |i^S•60
TTTS—I Conductance
Temp. °C
pHfT^fT
Redox Potential Eh (mV) | S\H
Turbidity (NTU) Po""
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill - Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Date. 6/06/2012 Rev 7 2
Volume of Water Purged | ^G.QH
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 =
gallon(s)
.217
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q= I DH.QM
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs AVO/^L 6-HL
Type of Sample Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
if other than as
speciHed below)
Filtered Preservative Type Preservative Added Type of Sample
Y N
Sample Vol (indicate
if other than as
speciHed below) Y N
Preservative Type
Y N
VOCs • 3x40 ml • Q HCL •
Nutrients • 100 ml • H2S04 •
Heavy Metals m • 250 ml • HN03 •
All Other Non Radiologics m • 250 ml • No Preserv. •
Gross Alpha • 1,000 ml • HN03 •
Other (specify) Q • Sample volume • •
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth | W'^.gS Sample Time OSSS
Comment
See instmction
fv^r^* 0G5S. fuvr^eA ^eji -Rr ^ -fof^^l oT 120 Y^in^jdcs . V/^-cVer ^ dear
?ovr^c e^^ieA ^nA Sfi/^ip'o ^olhc^cX ^ S'55, U^^- Sih. c(]^ O^jl^
MW-02 11-27-2012 Do not touch this cell (Sheeti^ame)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - [phone] - www.gel com
Company
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: Febmary 7, 2013
Energy Fuels Resoiuces (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
OaWa^l 1272012
315987002
Groimd Water
27-NOV-12 08:55
30-NOV-12
Client
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlOO
DNMIOOl
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty DL RL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
lad Gas Flow Proportional Coimting
JFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
S^OtaaiuiaAlpha^ fVM^ +1-0.323 0 544 1.00 pCi/L KDFl 12/08/12 1301 1267600 1
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Viethod Description Analvst Comments
EPA 900.1 Modified
>iuTogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
Jarium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 102 (25%-125%)
»RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.