Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRC-2013-001136 - 0901a06880344446ENERGY FUELS En DRC-2OI3-OOII36 Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. 225 Union Blvd. Suite 600 Lakewood, CO, US, 80228 303 974 2140 www.energyfuels.com VIA EMAIL AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY Janaury 17, 2013 Mr. Rusty Lundberg Director of the Utah Division of Radiation Control State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality 195 North 1950 West P.O. Box 144850 Sah Lake City, UT 84116-4850 Re: White Mesa Uranium Mill - RML UT1900479 Notice of Violation ("NOV") DRC Inspection Module PEM-01 Dear Mr. Lundberg: This letter responds to the above named NOV and Division of Radiation Control ("DRC") letter dated December 17, 2012 regarding Posting of Radiation Areas at the White Mesa Mill (the "Mill"). Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. ("EFRI") paid the penalty of $750 specified in that letter and NOV on January 3, 2013. This letter responds to DRC's letter of December 17, 2012 and January 7, 2013 requesting a written response. 1. Facts and Background a) UAC R313-15-902(4) states: "Posting of Airborne Radioactivity Areas. The licensee or registrant shall post each airborne radioactivity area with a conspicuous sign or signs bearing the radiation symbol and the words "CAUTION, AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVTY AREA or "DANGER, AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVTY AREA." b) R313-15 does not define the term "airborne radioactivity area". However, R313-15-901 requires that the radiation symbol and posting be applied as prescribed by 10 CFR 20.1901 (2010) which defines "airborne radioactivity area". c) Section 1.1.1 of the Mill's Approved Radiation Protection Manual ("RPM"), states: "For work where there is the potential to cause airborne radiation doses to site personnel, the frequency and type of air sampling to be conducted is determined from measured air concentrations: 0.01 DAC-0.1 DAC Quarterly or monthly area or sampling and/or bioassay measurements Letter to Rusty Lundberg January 17, 2013 Page 2 of 6 >0.1 DAC d) e) Continuous sampling is appropriate is concentrations are likely to exceed 0.10 DAC averaged over 40 hours or longer. The Radiation Safety Officer ("RSO") will determine the exact frequency of area air sampling, breathing zone sampling and/or bioassay measurements and determine how many workers in a group of workers performing similar jobs are to be equipped with breathing zone air samples." Typically, Mill radiation personnel collect airborne particulate samples for alpha measurement from each area at least monthly. If the sampling indicates the area is above the Mill's ALARA goal of 25% of the Derived Air Concentration ("0.25 DAC"), the sampling is repeated weekly until the results show the area is below 25% of the DAC (0.25 DAC). The Mill's RSO determines whether Airborne Radiation Area Posting is required based on the results of the area air sampling. The area is posted whenever the airborne alpha concentration reaches or exceeds 25% of DAC. f) The four area airborne filter samples taken on November 3, 2012 (two samples) and November 4, 2012 (two samples) and November 6, 2012 (one sample) indicated that the concentrations were below 25% of the DAC, ranging from 0 to a maximum of 18.35% of DAC (0 to 0.18 DAC). That is, per the approved RPM and per R313-15-902(4), no posting was required. The Monthly Area Airborne Sampling Field Sheet for November 2012, used to determine the percentage of DAC and whether posting is required, is provided in Attachment 1. g) The SAG mill area has been determined to generate dust hazards whenever the SAG mill equipment is operating. It is the Mill policy to require the use of respirators whenever the SAG mill is in operation, for compliance with Mine Safety and Health Act requirements for general respiratory protection from airborne dust, whether or not the dust contains radioactive constituents. Since July of 2012, for conservatism, the Mill's RSO has adopted the practice of leaving Airborne Radioactivity Signs in place at all times whether or not the airborne sampling indicates an exceedance of 25% of DAC. Although, per the RPM, the Airborne Radioactivity Area signs are not specifically required whenever the airborne concentrations are less than 25%) of DAC, as was the case on November 15 and 16, 2012, (i) Due to the use of periodic grab samples for airborne radioactivity and DAC determination, there is a potential that between grab samples, the airborne radioactivity may vary, and (ii) The signs provide an additional reminder for workers to wear respiratory protection from dust hazards any time the SAG mill is in operation. h) On November 15 and 16, 2012, DRC personnel conducted Inspection Module PEM-01 at the Mill. i) The SAG mill had operated for some period on November 15, 2012, but was not in operation at Letter to Rusty Lundberg January 17, 2013 Page 3 of 6 the time of the DRC inspection. j) During the November 15 and 16, 2012 inspection, DRC personnel questioned why there was no radiation hazard sign at the lower entrance to the SAG Mill area. A specific sign (the "Respiratory Protection sign") reading "NOTICE: RESPIRATORS AND HEARE^G PROTECTION REQUIRED WHEN S.A.G. MILL IS IN OPERATION" was posted. k) The Mill's RSO did not present to DRC the data, discussed earlier, which demonstrates that the area was below 25% of the DAC and no airborne radiation hazard sign was required. The Mill's RSO did not explain the Mill's policy of leaving the Airborne Radioactivity Area signs in place whether or not the airborne sampling indicated they were required. The Mill's RSO apparently did show the DRC personnel that some Airborne Radioactivity Area signs were in place at other entrances to the SAG mill area, without explaining why. 1) As discussed above, it is the Mill's current policy to leave both the respiratory Protection Sign and the Airborne Radiation Sign in place at all times. EFRI agrees that although the Airborne Radioactivity Area sign may not have been required at the time of the DRC inspection, it is prudent to have it posted at all the SAG mill entrance locations where the Respiratory Protection signs are posted. 2. Corrective Steps Taken and Results Achieved Despite the fact that the Airborne Radioactivity Area signs were not required, for consistency with the other entrances to the SAG mill area, on November 15, 2012, Mill radiation safety personnel placed an Airborne Radioactivity Sign at the area indicated by DRC. The sign was attached by chains below the existing hearing and respiratory protection sign to the side of the lower walkway into the SAG mill area. A photograph showing the sign in place is provided in Attachment 2. Mr. Philip Goble of DRC was present in the Mill on December 20, 2012, observed and photographed the location of the additional sign, and concurred that the placement was sufficiently conspicuous to comply with R313-15-902(4). 3. Corrective Steps to Prevent Recurrence The Mill proposes, for conservatism, to leave the Airborne Radiation Area signs at the entrances to the SAG mill area, including the lower entrance, in place at all times. 4. Date Full Compliance Will Be Achieved As discussed above, the Mill was in compliance with R313-15 at the time of the inspection. For consistency with signage at other entrances to the Sag mill area, the Mill placed the sign at the lower entrance to the SAG mill area on December 15, 2012. Letter to Rusty Lundberg January 17, 2013 Page 4 of 6 If you have any questions, please contact me at (303) 389-4132. Yours very truly. ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC. Jo Ann Tischler Manager, Compliance and Licensing cc Kevin Carney, Utah DRC David C. Frydenlund Phil Goble, Utah DRC Dan Hillsten Ronnie Nieves Harold R. Roberts David E. Turk Kathy Weinel Attachments Letter to Rusty Lundberg January 17, 2013 Page 5 of 6 ATTACHMENT 1 Area Airborne Concentration and Determination of DAC c: (D E (D 0) Q c g pq •o 1=3 S x: 5 •Z ^ WD si s b o o 2 ^ " o (si] CM a tl ^ o s o p o U o U 3 CQ o H PQ § O O o U fi o 12 u- Q O c o , o ® Si •p .id X5 3 u 2> o ^ OH 2 Q > O O 3 IS O w > .a 03 H PQ OJ <u Cj '•-> -•-> ti- ll T3 O o U £ ^ ^ > o u •a § o u CO OQ i 3 O o H II II W E rvl U c c U 3 II Q o e CU < Letter to Rusty Lundberg January 17, 2013 Page 6 of 6 ATTACHMENT 2 Photograph of Airborne Radioactivity Sign in Place