The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDAQ-2024-0050631 DAQC-101-24 Site ID 10007 (B4) MEMORANDUM TO: STACK TEST FILE – BIG WEST OIL, LLC – Flue Gas Stack THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist DATE: February 5, 2024 SUBJECT: Contact: Brady Miller: 385-324-1275 Location: 333 West Center Street, North Salt Lake, UT 84054 Tester: Alliance Technical Group, LLC: 352-663-7568 Sources: MSCC FRS ID#: UT0000004901100008 AO #: DAQE-AN101220077-22, dated January 13, 2022 Action Code: Tr Subject: Review of stack test report dated February 2, 2024 On February 2, 2024, the DAQ received a test report for the Big West Oil, LLC’s MSCC Flue Gas Stack in North Salt Lake, UT. Testing was performed December 15, 2023, to demonstrate compliance with the emission limit found in Condition II.B.3.a. The DAQ-calculated test results are: Source Test Date RM/Pollutant DAQ Result Test Result Limit MSCC 12/15/2023 5/202 PM 0.085* 0.085* 0.5* * lb/1000 lbs coke burn-off DEVIATIONS: None noted. CONCLUSION: The stack emissions test report appears to be acceptable. RECOMMENDATION: The emissions should be considered to have been in compliance with the applicable limits at the time of testing. No further action is necessary. HPV: No. ATTACHMENTS: Test report received February 2, 2024 DAQ generated Excel spreadsheets 6 , 3 Source Test Big West Oil, LLC 333 West Center Street North Salt Lake, UT 84054 Sources Tested: MSCC Test Date: December 15, 2023 Project No. AST-2023-4280 Prepared By Alliance Technical Group, LLC 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120 Source Test Report Test Program Summary AST-2023-4280 BWO – North Salt Lake, Utah Page i Regulatory Information Permit No. Approval Order DAQE-AN101220077-22 Regulatory Citations 40 CFR 60, Subpart J, Subpart Ja 40 CFR 63, Subpart UUU Utah SIP IX.H.1.g.i.B.I Source Information Source Name Target Parameters MSCC PM10, PM2.5 Contact Information Test Location Test Company Analytical Laboratory Big West Oil, LLC 333 West Center Street North Salt Lake, UT 84054 Brady Miller brady.miller@bigwestoil.com (385) 324-1275 Faithe Schwartzengraber faithe.schwartzengraber@bigwestoil.com (801) 296-7763 Alliance Technical Group, LLC 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120 Project Manager Charles Horton charles.horton@alliancetg.com (352) 663-7568 Field Team Leader Alan Jensen alan.jensen@alliancetg.com (847) 220-3949 QA/QC Manager Kathleen Shonk katie.shonk@alliancetg.com (812) 452-4785 Report Coordinator Delaine Spangler delaine.spangler@alliancetg.com Alliance Technical Group, LLC 5530 Marshall Street Arvada, CO 80002 Eric Grosjean eric.grosjean@alliancetg.com (303)420-5949 1 of 65 Source Test Report Certification Statement AST-2023-4280 BWO – North Salt Lake, Utah Page ii Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without written approval from the customer. To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the relevant sections in the test report. This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document. Charles Horton, QSTI Project Manager Alliance Technical Group, LLC Date 1/16/2024 2 of 65 Source Test Report Table of Contents AST-2023-4280 BWO – North Salt Lake, Utah Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Team ............................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification ........................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Summary of Results .................................................................................................................................... 2-1 3.0 Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Volumetric Flow Rate ......................................................... 3-1 3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A – Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide .............................................................. 3-1 3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content ............................................................................ 3-1 3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 5B and 202 – Total Particulate Matter ................................................ 3-2 3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control – U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A ............................................ 3-2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1: Project Team ........................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Table 2-1: Summary of Results ................................................................................................................................ 2-1 Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................. 3-1 APPENDICES Appendix A Sample Calculations Appendix B Field Data Appendix C Laboratory Data Appendix D Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data Appendix E Process Operating/Control System Data 3 of 65 Introduction 4 of 65 Source Test Report Introduction AST-2023-4280 BWO – North Salt Lake, Utah Page 1-1 1.0 Introduction Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Big West Oil, LLC (BWO) to conduct compliance testing at the North Salt Lake, Utah refinery. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of 40 CFR 60, Subpart J, Subpart Ja, and 40 CFR 63, Subpart UUU. The facility operates under the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Approval Order (AO) DAQE-AN101220077-22. Compliance testing included determining the emission rates of particulate matter (PM), particulate matter less than 10 microns (PM10) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5) at the exhaust of the MSCC. 1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions The MSCC is a type of Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) process that converts heavy crude oil fractions into lighter, more valuable hydrocarbon products at high temperature and moderate pressure in the presence of a fine ly divided silica/alumina-based catalyst. In the course of cracking large hydrocarbon molecules into smaller molecules, a nonvolatile carbonaceous material, commonly referred to as coke, is deposited on the catalyst. The coke laid down on the catalyst acts to deactivate the catalytic cracking activity of the catalyst by blocking access to the active catalytic sites. In order to regenerate the catalytic activity of the catalyst, the coke deposited on the catalyst is burned off with air in the regenerator vessel. 1.2 Project Team Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table. Table 1-1: Project Team BWO Personnel Brady Miller Eric Simdorn Regulatory Agency UDAQ Alliance Personnel Alan Jensen Xander Krahn 1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by BWO. 5 of 65 Summary of Results 6 of 65 Source Test Report Summary of Results AST-2023-4280 BWO – North Salt Lake, Utah Page 2-1 2.0 Summary of Results Alliance conducted compliance testing at the BWO facility in North Salt Lake, Utah on December 15, 2023. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of 40 CFR 60, Subpart J, Subpart Ja, and 40 CFR 63, Subpart UUU. The facility operates under UDAQ AO DAQE-AN101220077-22. Compliance testing included determining the emission rates of PM, PM10 and PM2.5 at the exhaust of the MSCC. Table 2-1 provides a summary of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable UDAQ permit limits. Any difference between the summary results listed in the following table(s) and the detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation. Table 2-1: Summary of Results Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Date 12/15/23 12/15/23 12/15/23 -- Coke Burn off Rate, lb/hr 10,199 9,996 10,052 10,082 Filterable Particulate Matter Data Concentration, grain/dscf 0.00081 0.00082 0.00047 0.00070 Emission Rate, lb/hr 0.24 0.24 0.14 0.21 Emission Factor, lb/1,000 lbs Coke Burned 0.024 0.024 0.014 0.020 Emission Limit, lb/1,000 lbs Coke Burned -- -- -- 1.0 Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 2 Condensable Particulate Matter Data Concentration, grain/dscf 0.0022 0.0027 0.0017 0.0022 Emission Rate, lb/hr 0.66 0.79 0.51 0.65 Emission Factor, lb/1,000 lbs Coke Burned 0.065 0.079 0.050 0.065 Total Particulate Matter Data 1 Concentration, grain/dscf 0.0030 0.0035 0.0022 0.0029 Emission Rate, lb/hr 0.90 1.03 0.65 0.86 Emission Factor, lb/1,000 lbs Coke Burned 0.088 0.103 0.064 0.085 Emission Limit, lb/1,000 lbs Coke Burned -- -- -- 1.0 Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 9 Oxygen Data Concentration, % 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.10 Carbon Dioxide Data Concentration, % 17.40 17.10 17.00 17.17 1 Total PM is the summation of filterable PM and condensable PM. 7 of 65 Testing Methodology 8 of 65 Source Test Report Testing Methodology AST-2023-4280 BWO – North Salt Lake, Utah Page 3-1 3.0 Testing Methodology The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix D. Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology Parameter U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods Notes/Remarks Volumetric Flow Rate 1 & 2 Full Velocity Traverses Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Instrumental Analysis Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis Total Particulate Matter 5B & 202 Isokinetic Sampling 3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Volumetric Flow Rate The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-1 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 1. Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure, and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type thermocouple and pyrometer. Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2. 3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A – Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide The oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system, and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.5. The relative accuracy of the O2 CEMS were determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 3. 3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content The stack gas moisture content was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on the same analytical balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed. 9 of 65 Source Test Report Testing Methodology AST-2023-4280 BWO – North Salt Lake, Utah Page 3-2 3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 5B and 202 – Total Particulate Matter The total particulate matter (filterable and condensable PM) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 5B and 202. The complete sampling system consisted of a glass nozzle, glass-lined probe, oven-dried at 160 ±5 °C (320 ±10 °F), pre-weighed quartz filter, coil condenser, un-weighed Teflon filter, gas conditioning train, pump, and calibrated dry gas meter. The gas conditioning train consisted of a coiled condenser and four (4) chilled impingers. The first and second impingers were initially empty, the third contained 100 mL of de-ionized water and the last impinger contained 200-300 grams of silica gel. The un-weighed 90 mm Teflon filter was placed between the second and third impingers. The probe liner and filter heating systems were maintained at a temperature of 160 ± 14°C (320 ±25°F) and the impinger temperature were maintained at 20°C (68°F) or less throughout the testing. Following the completion of each test run, the sampling train was leak checked at a vacuum pressure greater than or equal to the highest vacuum pressure observed during the run. If condensate was collected in the first dry impinger, then the front-half of the sample train (the nozzle, probe, and heated pre-weighed filter) was removed in order to purge the back-half of the sample train (coil condenser, first and second impingers and CPM filter). A glass bubbler was inserted into the first impinger. If needed, de-ionized ultra-filtered (DIUF) water was added to the first impinger to raise the water level above the bubbler, then the coil condenser was replaced. Zero nitrogen was connected to the condenser, and a 60-minute purge at 14 liters per minute was conducted. After the completion of the nitrogen purge the impinger contents were measured for moisture gain. The nitrogen purge was omitted if minimal condensate was collected in the dry impingers. The pre-weighed quartz filter was carefully removed and placed in container 1. The probe, nozzle and front half of the filter holder was rinsed three (3) times with acetone to remove any adhering particulate matter and these rinses were recovered in container 2. All containers were sealed, labeled, and liquid levels marked for transport to the identified laboratory for filterable particulate matter analysis. The contents of impingers 1 and 2 were recovered in container CPM Cont. #1. The back half of the filterable PM filter holder, the coil condenser, impingers 1 and 2 and all connecting glassware were rinsed with DIUF water and then rinsed with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinses were added to container CPM Cont. #1 while the solvent rinses were recovered in container CPM Cont. #2. The Teflon filter was removed from the filter holder and placed in container CPM Cont. #3. The front half of the condensable PM filter holder was rinsed with DIUF water and then with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinse was added to container CPM Cont. #1 while the solvent rinses were added to container CPM Cont. #2. All containers were sealed, labeled, and liquid levels marked for transport to the identified laboratory for condensable particulate matter analysis. 3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control – U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol 1 (+/- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix. Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases were sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference. 10 of 65 Source Test Report Testing Methodology AST-2023-4280 BWO – North Salt Lake, Utah Page 3-3 High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppmv/% (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppmv/% (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low- Level gas was zero gas, the response was 0.5 ppmv/% or 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration (whichever was less restrictive). The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded. The measurement system response time and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference. High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe. After the analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated. Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference. If the drift exceeded 3 percent or 0.5 ppmv/%, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated. To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The pollutant concentrations were measured at three points (16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each traverse point was sampled for a minimum of twice the system response time. If the pollutant concentration at each traverse point did not differ more than 5 percent or 0.5 ppmv/0.3% (whichever was less restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling was conducted during the test runs. If the pollutant concentration did not meet these specifications but differed less than 10 percent or 1.0 ppmv/0.5% from the average concentration, then three (3) point sampling was conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - 16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter – 0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters from the stack wall). If the pollutant concentration differed by more than 10 percent or 1.0 ppmv/0.5% from the average concentration, then sampling was conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse points. Copies of stratification check data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix. A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (1) minute averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the completion of testing, the data was also saved to the AST server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at AST’s office, all written and electronic data was relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager. 11 of 65 Appendix A 12 of 65 Appendix A Example Calculations Location: Source: Project No.: Run No.: Parameter: Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg where, Pb 26.10 = barometric pressure, in. Hg ΔH 1.442 = pressure differential of orifice, in H2O Pm 26.21 = in. Hg Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg where, Pb 26.10 = barometric pressure, in. Hg Pg 0.07 = static pressure, in. H2O Ps 26.11 = in. Hg Standard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf where, Y 0.985 = meter correction factor Vm 42.026 = meter volume, cf Pm 26.21 = absolute meter pressure, in. Hg Tm 526.6 = absolute meter temperature, oR Vmstd 36.332 = dscf Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf where, Vlc 78.6 = weight of H2O collected, g Vwstd 3.707 = scf Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimensionless (theoretical at saturated conditions) where, Ts 499.6 = stack temperature, °F Ps 26.11 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg BWSsat 48.027 = dimensionless Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless (measured) where, Vwstd 3.707 = standard wet volume, scf Vmstd 36.332 = standard meter volume, dscf BWS 0.093 = dimensionless Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless where, BWSsat 48.027 = moisture fraction (theoretical at saturated conditions) BWSmsd 0.093 = moisture fraction (measured) BWS 0.093 Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 1 PM/CPM Pm ൌ Pb ൅ Δ H 13.6 Ps ൌ Pb ൅ Pg 13.6 𝑉𝑚𝑠𝑡𝑑 ൌ 17.636 ൈ Y ൈ Vm ൈ Pm 𝑇𝑚 Vwstd ൌ 0.04716 ൈ Vlc BWSsat ൌ 10଺.ଷ଻ି ଶ,଼ଶ଻ ୘ୱାଷ଺ହ Ps BWS ൌ Vwstd ሺVwstd ൅ Vmstdሻ BWS ൌ BWSmsd unless BWSsat ൏ BWSmsd 13 of 65 Appendix A Example Calculations Location: Source: Project No.: Run No.: Parameter: Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 1 PM/CPM Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lb/lb-mole where, CO2 17.4 = carbon dioxide concentration, % O2 1.0 = oxygen concentration, % Md 30.82 = lb/lb mol Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/lb-mole where, Md 30.82 = molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol BWS 0.093 = moisture fraction, dimensionless Ms 29.64 = lb/lb mol Average Velocity (Vs), ft/sec where, Cp 0.840 = pitot tube coefficient Δ P1/2 0.366 = velocity head of stack gas, (in. H2O)1/2 Ts 959.3 = absolute stack temperature, °R Ps 26.11 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg Ms 29.64 = molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb mol Vs 29.3 = ft/sec Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm where, Vs 29.3 = stack gas velocity, ft/sec As 45.66 = cross-sectional area of stack, ft2 Qa 80,173 = acfm Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm where, Qa 80,173 = average stack gas flow at stack conditions, acfm BWS 0.093 = moisture fraction, dimensionless Ps 26.11 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg Ts 959.3 = absolute stack temperature, °R Qs 34,917 = dscfm Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check (Yqa), dimensionless where, Y 0.985 = meter correction factor, dimensionless Θ 60 = run time, min. Vm 42.026 = total meter volume, dcf Tm 526.6 = absolute meter temperature, °R ΔH@ 1.843 = orifice meter calibration coefficient, in. H2O Pb 26.10 = barometric pressure, in. Hg ΔH avg 1.442 = average pressure differential of orifice, in H2O Md 30.82 = molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol (Δ H)1/2 1.200 = average squareroot pressure differential of orifice, (in. H2O)1/2 Yqa 0.5 = percent Md ൌ ሺ0.44 ൈ % COଶሻ ൅ ሺ0.32 ൈ % O2ሻ ൅ ሺ0.28 ሺ100 െ % COଶ െ % O2ሻሻ Ms ൌ Md ሺ1 െ BWSሻ ൅ 18.015 ሺBWSሻ Qa ൌ 60 ൈ Vs ൈ As Qs ൌ 17.636 ൈ Qa ൈ ሺ1 െ BWSሻ ൈ Ps Ts Vs ൌ 85.49 ൈ Cp ൈ ሺΔ P ଵ/ଶሻ avg ൈ Ts Ps x Ms Yqa ൌ Y െ Θ Vm 0.0319 ൈ Tm ൈ 29 Δ𝐻@ ൈ Pb ൅ Δ Havg. 13.6 ൈ𝑀𝑑 ΔH avg. 𝑌 ൈ 100 14 of 65 Appendix A Example Calculations Location: Source: Project No.: Run No.: Parameter: Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 1 PM/CPM Volume of Nozzle (Vn), ft3 where, Ts 959.3 = absolute stack temperature, °R Ps 26.11 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg Vlc 78.6 = volume of H2O collected, ml Vm 42.026 = meter volume, cf Pm 26.21 = absolute meter pressure, in. Hg Y 0.985 = meter correction factor, unitless Tm 526.6 = absolute meter temperature, oR Vn 83.408 = volume of nozzle, ft3 Isokinetic Sampling Rate (I), % where, Vn 83.408 = nozzle volume, ft3 θ 60.0 = run time, minutes An 0.00079 = area of nozzle, ft2 Vs 29.3 = average velocity, ft/sec I 100.5 = % Filterable PM Concentration (Cs), grain/dscf where, Mn 1.9 = filterable PM mass, mg Vmstd 36.332 = standard meter volume, dscf Cs 0.0008 = grain/dscf Filterable PM Emission Rate (PMR), lb/hr where, Cs 0.0008 = filterable PM concentration, grain/dscf Qs 34,917 = average stack gas flow at standard conditions, dscfm PMR 0.24 = lb/hr Filterable PM Emission Factor (EFPM), lb/klb coke burned where, PMR 0.24 = filterable PM emission rate, lb/hr FR 10,233 = process feed rate, lb/hr EFPM 0.02 = lb/klb coke burned Condensable PM Concentration (CCPM), grain/dscf where, MCPM 5.2 = condensable PM mass, mg Vmstd 36.332 = standard meter volume, dscf CCPM 0.0022 = grain/dscf C௦ ൌ M୬ ൈ 0.0154 Vmstd PMR ൌ Cୱ ൈ Qs ൈ 60 7.0E ൅ 03 𝐸𝐹௉ெ ൌ 𝑃𝑀𝑅 ൈ 1.0𝐸൅03 𝐹𝑅 Cେ୔୑ ൌ Mେ୔୑ ൈ 0.0154 Vmstd Vn ൌ 𝑇𝑠 𝑃𝑠 0.002669 ൈ𝑉𝑙𝑐൅Vm ൈ𝑃𝑚ൈ𝑌 𝑇𝑚 15 of 65 Appendix A Example Calculations Location: Source: Project No.: Run No.: Parameter: Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 1 PM/CPM Condensable PM Emission Rate (ERCPM), lb/hr where, CCPM 0.0022 = condensable PM concentration, grain/dscf Qs 34,917 = average stack gas flow at standard conditions, dscfm ERCPM 0.66 = lb/hr Condensable PM Emission Factor (EFCPM), lb/klb coke burned where, ERCPM 0.66 = condensable PM emission rate, lb/hr FR 10,233 = process feed rate, lb/hr EFCPM 0.06 = lb/klb coke burned Total PM Concentration (CTPM), grain/dscf where, Cs 0.0008 = filterable PM concentration, grain/dscf CCPM 0.0022 = condensable PM concentration, grain/dscf CTPM 0.0030 = grain/dscf Total PM Emission Rate (ERTPM), lb/hr where, PMR 0.24 = filterable PM emission rate, lb/hr ERCPM 0.66 = condensable PM emission rate, lb/hr ERTPM 0.90 = lb/hr Total PM Emission Rate (ERTPMTPY), lb/klb coke burned where, ERTPM 0.90 = total PM emission rate, lb/hr FR 10,233 = process feed rate, lb/hr EFTPM 0.09 = lb/klb coke burned ERେ୔୑ ൌ Cେ୔୑ ൈ Qs ൈ 60 𝑚𝑖𝑛 ℎ𝑟 7.0E ൅ 03 𝐸𝐹஼௉ெ ൌ 𝐸𝑅஼௉ெ ൈ 1.0𝐸൅03 𝐹𝑅 𝐶்௉ெ ൌ𝐶ௌ ൅𝐶஼௉ெ 𝐸𝑅்௉ெ ൌ𝑃𝑀𝑅൅𝐸𝑅஼௉ெ 𝐸𝐹்௉ெ ൌ 𝐸𝑅்௉ெ ൈ 1.0𝐸൅03 𝐹𝑅 16 of 65 Location: Source: Project No.: Run No. /Method O₂ - Outlet Concentration (C O₂), % dry CMA ( CM - C0 ) where, Cobs 1.3 = average analyzer value during test, % dry Co 0.4 = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, % dry CMA 11.0 = actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry CM 10.8 = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, % dry CO₂1.0 = O₂ Concentration, % dry CO₂ = ( Cobs - C0 ) x Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 Run 1 / Method 3A CO₂ - Outlet Concentration (C CO₂), % dry C M A ( CM - C 0 ) where, Cobs 16.8 Co 0.4 CMA 10.9 CM 10.7 CCO₂17.4 = average analyzer value during test, % dry = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, % dry = actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, % dry = CO₂ Concentration, % dry CCO₂ = ( Cobs - C0 ) x 17 of 65 Appendix B 18 of 65 Emission Calculations Location Source Project No. Parameter Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Date 12/15/23 12/15/23 12/15/23 -- Start Time 12:52 15:05 16:40 -- Stop Time 13:58 16:15 17:51 -- Run Time, min (θ) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 Coke Burn Rate, lb/hr (FR) 10,199 9,996 10,052 10,082 Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb) 26.10 26.10 26.04 26.08 Meter Correction Factor (Y) 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985 Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @) 1.843 1.843 1.843 1.843 Meter Volume, ft3 (Vm) 42.026 41.360 41.367 41.584 Meter Temperature, °F (Tm) 66.9 67.3 62.1 65.4 Meter Temperature, °R (Tm) 526.6 527.0 521.8 525.1 Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (ΔH) 1.442 1.400 1.425 1.422 Volume H2O Collected, mL (Vlc) 78.6 90.2 83.3 84.0 Nozzle Diameter, in (Dn) 0.380 0.380 0.380 0.380 Area of Nozzle, ft2 (An) 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 Filterable PM Mass, mg (Mn) 1.9 1.9 1.1 1.6 Condensable PM Mass, mg (MCPM)5.2 6.3 4.0 5.2 Standard Meter Volume, ft3 (Vmstd) 36.332 35.723 36.009 36.021 Standard Water Volume, ft3 (Vwstd) 3.707 4.254 3.928 3.963 Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.093 0.106 0.098 0.099 Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 48.027 47.714 48.103 47.948 Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.093 0.106 0.098 0.099 Meter Pressure, in Hg (Pm) 26.21 26.20 26.14 26.18 Volume at Nozzle, ft3 (Vn) 83.408 83.213 83.381 83.33 Isokinetic Sampling Rate, (%) (I) 100.5 101.5 100.8 100.9 DGM Calibration Check Value, (+/- 5%)(Yqa)0.5 0.2 -0.2 0.2 Filterable PM Concentration, grain/dscf (Cs)0.00081 0.00082 0.00047 0.00070 Filterable PM Emission Rate, lb/hr (PMR) 0.24 0.24 0.14 0.21 Filterable PM Emission Factor, lb/klb coke burned (EFPM)0.024 0.024 0.014 0.020 Condensable PM Concentration, grain/dscf (CCPM)0.0022 0.0027 0.0017 0.0022 Condensable PM Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERCPM)0.66 0.79 0.51 0.65 Condensable PM Emission Factor, lb/klb coke burned (EFCPM)0.065 0.079 0.050 0.065 Total PM Concentration, grain/dscf (CTPM)0.0030 0.0035 0.0022 0.0029 Total PM Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERTPM)0.90 1.03 0.65 0.86 Total PM Emission Factor, lb/klb coke burned (EFTPM)0.088 0.103 0.064 0.085 Underlined values contained one or more fractions below the detection limit; the MDL was used in calculations. EMISSION CALCULATIONS Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 PM/CPM INPUT DATA ISOKINETIC DATA 19 of 65 Emission Calculations Location Source Project No. Parameter Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Date 12/15/23 12/15/23 12/15/23 -- Start Time 12:52 15:05 16:40 -- Stop Time 13:58 16:15 17:51 -- Run Time, min 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 Point 1 0.11 0.14 0.13 0.13 Point 2 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.13 Point 3 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.14 Point 4 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 Point 5 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.13 Point 6 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.13 Point 7 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 Point 8 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.13 Point 9 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.14 Point 10 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.14 Point 11 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.14 Point 12 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.13 Square Root of ΔP, (in. WC)1/2 (ΔP) 0.366 0.360 0.364 0.363 Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840 Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb) 26.10 26.10 26.04 26.08 Static Pressure, in. WC (Pg) 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Stack Pressure, in. Hg (Ps) 26.11 26.11 26.05 26.09 Stack Cross-sectional Area, ft2 (As) 45.66 45.66 45.66 45.66 Temperature, °F (Ts) 499.6 498.8 499.5 499.3 Temperature, °R (Ts) 959.3 958.5 959.2 959.0 Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.093 0.106 0.098 0.099 Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 48.027 47.714 48.103 47.948 Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.093 0.106 0.098 0.099 O2 Concentration, %(O2)1.00 1.10 1.20 1.10 CO2 Concentration, %(CO2)17.40 17.10 17.00 17.17 Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry) (Md) 30.82 30.78 30.77 30.79 Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet) (Ms) 29.64 29.42 29.51 29.52 Velocity, ft/sec (Vs) 29.3 28.9 29.2 29.1 At Stack Conditions, acfm (Qa) 80,173 79,209 79,944 79,775 At Standard Conditions, scfm (Qsw) 38,479 38,046 38,284 38,270 At Standard Conditions, dscfm (Qs) 34,917 33,997 34,518 34,477 Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE CALCULATED DATA VELOCITY HEAD, in. WC PM/CPM 20 of 65 Method 1 Data Location Source Project No. Date: Vertical Circular 108.00 in 16.50 in 91.50 in 45.66 ft2 2 60.0 ft 7.9 (must be ≥ 0.5) 60.0 ft 7.9 (must be ≥ 2) 12 12 1 Measurer (Initial and Date):XGK 12/15 Reviewer (Initial and Date):SPR 12/15 23456789101112 1 14.6 -- 6.7 -- 4.4 -- 3.2 -- 2.6 -- 2.1 1 4.4 4.03 20 1/2 2 85.4 -- 25.0 -- 14.6 -- 10.5 -- 8.2 -- 6.7 2 14.6 13.36 29 7/8 3 -- -- 75.0 -- 29.6 -- 19.4 -- 14.6 -- 11.8 3 29.6 27.08 43 9/16 4 -- -- 93.3 -- 70.4 -- 32.3 -- 22.6 -- 17.7 4 70.4 64.42 80 15/16 5 -- -- -- -- 85.4 -- 67.7 -- 34.2 -- 25.0 5 85.4 78.14 94 5/8 6 -- -- -- -- 95.6 -- 80.6 -- 65.8 -- 35.6 6 95.6 87.47 104 7 -- -- -- -- -- -- 89.5 -- 77.4 -- 64.4 7 -- -- -- 8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 96.8 -- 85.4 -- 75.0 8 -- -- -- 9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 91.8 -- 82.3 9 -- -- -- 10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.4 -- 88.2 10 -- -- -- 11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 93.3 11 -- -- -- 12 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.9 12 -- -- -- *Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point. A = 60 ft. B = 60 ft. Depth of Duct = 91.5 in. Duct Orientation: Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 12/15/23 Stack Parameters Duct Design: Nipple Length: Depth of Duct: Cross Sectional Area of Duct: Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port: No. of Test Ports: Number of Readings per Point: Distance A: Distance A Duct Diameters: Distance B: Distance B Duct Diameters: Minimum Number of Traverse Points: Actual Number of Traverse Points: CIRCULAR DUCT Number of traverse points on a diameter Stack Diagram Cross Sectional Area LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Traverse Point % of Diameter Distance from inside wall Distance from outside of port Upstream Disturbance Downstream Disturbance B A 21 of 65 Cyclonic Flow Check Location Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT Source MSCC Project No. 2023-4280 Date 12/15/23 Sample Point Angle (ΔP=0) 1 4 2 2 3 3 4 6 5 5 6 2 7 4 8 5 9 3 10 4 11 2 12 1 Average 3 22 of 65 Method 4 Data Location Source Project No. Parameter Analysis Run 1 Date:12/15/23 Impinger No.1234Total Contents Empty Empty H2O Silica -- Initial Mass, g 490.9 637.5 689.9 949.3 2767.6 Final Mass, g 553.6 641.1 687.7 963.8 2846.2 Gain 62.7 3.6 -2.2 14.5 78.6 Run 2 Date:12/15/23 Impinger No.1234Total Contents Empty Empty H2O Silica -- Initial Mass, g 475.6 645.2 718.4 916.0 2755.2 Final Mass, g 541.7 657.8 718.7 927.2 2845.4 Gain 66.1 12.6 0.3 11.2 90.2 Run 3 Date:12/15/23 Impinger No.1234Total Contents Empty Empty H2O Silica -- Initial Mass, g 491.8 640.0 687.7 963.8 2783.3 Final Mass, g 560.0 643.5 689.1 974.0 2866.6 Gain 68.2 3.5 1.4 10.2 83.3 Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 PM/CPM Gravimetric 23 of 65 Isokinetic Field Data Location: Start Time:Source: Date: VALID End Time:Project No.:2023-4280 PM/CPM Moisture: 10.0 % est.Est. Tm: 50 °F Pb: 26.10 in. Hg Barometric: 26.10 in. Hg Est. Ts: 499 °F Pg: 0.07 in. WC Static Press: 0.07 in. WC Est. ΔP: 0.14 in. WC O2:1.0 % Stack Press: 26.11 in. Hg Est. Dn: 0.401 in.CO2:17.4 % CO2:17.0 %Target Rate: 0.75 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr. O2:1.5 %LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf)-- N2/CO:81.5 %0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm):0.001 -- -- -- 0.001 Mid 2 (cf)-- Md: 30.78 lb/lb-mole GL-380 glass Vacuum (in Hg):16 -- -- -- 5 Mid 3 (cf)-- Ms: 29.50 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:Pass -- -- -- Pass -- Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit CPM Amb.Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. Begin End 51 Ideal Actual 51 51 51 51 A1 0.00 5.00 0.11 500 1.15 1.20 3 322 321 48 66 100.7 26.59 2 5.00 10.00 0.12 496 1.27 1.30 3 324 320 50 67 102.7 27.71 3 10.00 15.00 0.13 499 1.38 1.40 4 323 322 50 68 100.5 28.89 4 15.00 20.00 0.14 500 1.49 1.50 4 323 321 50 68 100.3 29.99 5 20.00 25.00 0.15 502 1.59 1.60 4 322 320 50 69 101.0 31.08 6 25.00 30.00 0.14 502 1.48 1.50 4 323 321 54 68 101.7 30.02 B1 30.00 35.00 0.13 498 1.38 1.40 4 322 325 55 67 101.5 28.87 2 35.00 40.00 0.13 498 1.38 1.40 4 321 325 55 66 100.5 28.87 3 40.00 45.00 0.15 499 1.60 1.60 4 322 326 56 66 101.0 31.03 4 45.00 50.00 0.14 500 1.49 1.50 4 321 327 56 67 101.0 29.99 5 50.00 55.00 0.14 500 1.49 1.50 4 322 324 55 67 100.8 29.99 6 55.00 60.00 0.13 501 1.38 1.40 4 321 320 57 69 102.0 28.92 Final DGM: Max Vac %ISO BWS 60.0 min 42.026 ft3 0.13 in. WC 66.9 °F 499.6 °F 4 1.442 in. WC 100.5 0.093 Gas Temperatures (°F) 10.263 69 68 67 51 Vs (fps) Pump Vac (in. Hg) Orifice Press. ΔH (in. WC) Sa m p l e Pt . Gas Temperatures (°F) DGM Average Amb. Sample Time (minutes) Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) 68 68 69 117.130 61 65 66 88.875 85.750 106.515 MSCC STACK DATA (EST) M5-9 Run 1 12:52 13:58 Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT STACK DATA (EST) EQUIPMENT MOIST. DATA Vlc (ml) 78.6 K-FACTOR STACK DATA (FINAL)FILTER NO. Parameter: 16971-C 12/15/23 0.985 1.843 Meter Box ID: Y: 0.5 YqaΔHTsΔPTm RE S U L T S 127.776 VmRun Time ΔH @ (in.WC): Probe ID: Nozzle ID: Nozzle Dn (in.): Liner Material: 102.920 Pitot Tube ΔP (in WC) 109.980 92.235 95.660 113.420 Pitot ID: 124.285 glass Pr709-1 Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):0.380 68 120.710 % ISO Pr709-1 Pitot Cp/Type: 99.225 67 67 24 of 65 Isokinetic Field Data Location: Start Time:Source: Date: VALID End Time:Project No.:2023-4280 PM/CPM Moisture: 10.0 % est.Est. Tm: 67 °F Pb: 26.10 in. Hg Barometric: 26.10 in. Hg Est. Ts: 500 °F Pg: 0.07 in. WC Static Press: 0.07 in. WC Est. ΔP: 0.13 in. WC O2:1.1 % Stack Press: 26.11 in. Hg Est. Dn: 0.399 in.CO2:17.1 % CO2:17.0 %Target Rate: 0.75 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr. O2:1.5 %LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf)-- N2/CO:81.5 %0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm):0.001 -- -- -- 0.001 Mid 2 (cf)-- Md: 30.78 lb/lb-mole GL-380 glass Vacuum (in Hg):15 -- -- -- 6 Mid 3 (cf)-- Ms: 29.50 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:Pass -- -- -- Pass -- Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit CPM Amb.Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. Begin End -- Ideal Actual -- -- -- -- A1 0.00 5.00 0.14 496 1.49 1.50 4 322 321 54 65 101.3 29.93 2 5.00 10.00 0.13 499 1.38 1.40 4 324 326 55 65 98.3 28.89 3 10.00 15.00 0.14 495 1.49 1.50 4 326 325 55 66 101.6 29.92 4 15.00 20.00 0.13 498 1.38 1.40 4 325 326 56 66 101.1 28.87 5 20.00 25.00 0.12 499 1.28 1.30 4 322 326 56 67 100.9 27.75 6 25.00 30.00 0.12 499 1.28 1.30 4 322 324 56 67 101.0 27.75 B1 30.00 35.00 0.12 500 1.28 1.30 4 324 326 57 66 101.8 27.77 2 35.00 40.00 0.13 501 1.38 1.40 4 325 327 57 66 100.8 28.92 3 40.00 45.00 0.13 500 1.38 1.40 4 322 327 58 66 100.3 28.90 4 45.00 50.00 0.14 499 1.49 1.50 4 322 328 58 66 101.3 29.98 5 50.00 55.00 0.14 500 1.48 1.50 4 325 328 59 65 102.0 29.99 6 55.00 60.00 0.12 500 1.28 1.30 4 326 324 60 65 100.8 27.77 Final DGM: Max Vac %ISO BWS 60.0 min 41.360 ft3 0.13 in. WC 67.3 °F 498.8 °F 4 1.400 in. WC 101.5 0.106 161.740 168.945 165.335 68 66 67 130.895 151.520 144.885 148.200 134.475 141.425 137.825 ΔP 172.255 68 68 66 158.310 154.865 68 15:05 K-FACTOR 16824-C STACK DATA (EST) Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) EQUIPMENT MSCC Vs (fps) Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT 12/15/23 STACK DATA (EST) M5-9 Sample Time (minutes) Nozzle Dn (in.): % ISO Nozzle ID: 16:15 STACK DATA (FINAL) Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf): Run 2 Parameter: Meter Box ID: Sa m p l e Pt . RE S U L T S Run Time 0.2 Vm ΔH Yqa Pump Vac (in. Hg) Gas Temperatures (°F) 68 68 65 68 TsTm 68 Liner Material: Gas Temperatures (°F) 10.60 Pitot ID: Pitot Cp/Type: 0.380 Pr709-1 Pitot Tube ΔP (in WC) Pr709-1 glass Orifice Press. ΔH (in. WC) DGM Average Amb. -- MOIST. DATA Vlc (ml) 90.2 FILTER NO. Y: ΔH @ (in.WC): Probe ID: 0.985 1.843 25 of 65 Isokinetic Field Data Location: Start Time:Source: Date: VALID End Time:Project No.:2023-4280 PM/CPM Moisture: 10.0 % est.Est. Tm: 67 °F Pb: 26.04 in. Hg Barometric: 26.10 in. Hg Est. Ts: 499 °F Pg: 0.07 in. WC Static Press: 0.07 in. WC Est. ΔP: 0.13 in. WC O2:1.2 % Stack Press: 26.11 in. Hg Est. Dn: 0.402 in.CO2:17.0 % CO2:17.0 %Target Rate: 0.75 scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr. O2:1.5 %LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf)-- N2/CO:81.5 %0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm):0.001 -- -- -- 0.001 Mid 2 (cf)-- Md: 30.78 lb/lb-mole GL-380 glass Vacuum (in Hg):15 -- -- -- 7 Mid 3 (cf)-- Ms: 29.50 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:Pass -- -- -- Pass -- Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit CPM Amb.Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. Begin End -- Ideal Actual -- -- -- -- A1 0.00 5.00 0.13 497 1.36 1.40 4 326 321 51 68 103.6 28.86 2 5.00 10.00 0.14 499 1.47 1.50 4 325 326 51 68 101.6 29.98 3 10.00 15.00 0.15 499 1.57 1.60 4 325 326 52 68 101.9 31.03 4 15.00 20.00 0.13 500 1.37 1.40 4 321 325 52 67 101.2 28.90 5 20.00 25.00 0.12 500 1.26 1.30 4 321 325 53 67 100.5 27.77 6 25.00 30.00 0.13 502 1.37 1.40 4 326 326 55 67 100.7 28.93 B1 30.00 35.00 0.12 500 1.26 1.30 4 329 327 55 66 100.8 27.77 2 35.00 40.00 0.12 501 1.26 1.30 4 328 326 56 66 100.5 27.78 3 40.00 45.00 0.13 500 1.37 1.40 4 328 322 56 66 100.3 28.90 4 45.00 50.00 0.13 499 1.37 1.40 4 325 321 57 67 100.2 28.89 5 50.00 55.00 0.15 498 1.58 1.60 4 323 321 57 67 100.6 31.01 6 55.00 60.00 0.14 499 1.48 1.50 4 322 323 58 66 101.0 29.98 Final DGM: Max Vac %ISO BWS 60.0 min 41.367 ft3 0.13 in. WC 62.1 °F 499.5 °F 4 1.425 in. WC 100.8 0.098 63 63 203.280 210.335 206.675 63 176.000 63 62 63 Pump Vac (in. Hg) STACK DATA (FINAL) 10.615 FILTER NO. Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf): % ISO Vs (fps) Orifice Press. ΔH (in. WC) Gas Temperatures (°F) 60 Gas Temperatures (°F) Pr709-1 1.843 glass Pr709-1 63 58 63 61 63 Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT 12/15/23 Run 3 STACK DATA (EST) M5-9 Nozzle ID: Nozzle Dn (in.): Sa m p l e Pt . Sample Time (minutes) Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3)-- 0.380 EQUIPMENT Meter Box ID: Y: ΔH @ (in.WC): Probe ID: Liner Material: Pitot ID: Pitot Cp/Type: 0.985 DGM Average Amb. Pitot Tube ΔP (in WC) 17:51 K-FACTOR MOIST. DATA Vlc (ml) 83.3 MSCC 16938-C STACK DATA (EST) Parameter: 16:40 172.519 196.615 193.335 186.660 189.930 183.240 199.885 179.550 -0.2 ΔHVm YqaΔPTmTs RE S U L T S Run Time 213.886 26 of 65 Emissions Calculations Location Source Project No. Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Date 12/15/23 12/15/23 12/15/23 -- Start Time 12:52 15:05 16:40 -- Stop Time 13:52 16:05 17:40 -- O₂ Concentration, % dry CO₂1.00 1.06 1.21 1.09 CO₂ Concentration, % dry CCO₂17.40 17.08 16.95 17.14 Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 Calculated Data - Outlet 27 of 65 Run 1 - RM Data Location: Source: Project No.: Date: Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet Unit % dry % dry Status Valid Valid Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)1.32 16.78 Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.96 10.91 Pretest System Zero Response 0.37 0.37 Posttest System Zero Response 0.37 0.43 Average Zero Response (Co)0.37 0.40 Pretest System Cal Response 10.78 10.46 Posttest System Cal Response 10.75 10.88 Average Cal Response (CM)10.77 10.67 Corrected Run Average (Corr)1.00 17.40 12:52 1.08 16.79 12:53 1.14 16.61 12:54 1.10 16.57 12:55 1.07 16.49 12:56 1.08 16.50 12:57 1.09 16.58 12:58 1.06 16.66 12:59 1.21 16.64 13:00 1.20 16.73 13:01 1.21 16.84 13:02 1.26 16.80 13:03 1.28 16.78 13:04 1.31 16.72 13:05 1.35 16.62 13:06 1.37 16.62 13:07 1.30 16.64 13:08 1.34 16.56 13:09 1.48 16.48 13:10 1.48 16.43 13:11 1.43 16.47 13:12 1.47 16.48 13:13 1.48 16.44 13:14 1.41 16.56 13:15 1.44 16.60 13:16 1.40 16.60 13:17 1.42 16.66 13:18 1.36 16.75 13:19 1.32 16.87 13:20 1.36 16.86 13:21 1.35 16.89 13:22 1.37 16.87 13:23 1.28 16.92 13:24 1.19 17.08 13:25 1.38 16.90 13:26 1.38 16.90 13:27 1.35 16.90 13:28 1.38 16.87 13:29 1.33 16.92 13:30 1.40 16.89 13:31 1.37 16.91 13:32 1.44 16.86 13:33 1.33 16.92 13:34 1.39 16.88 13:35 1.39 16.83 13:36 1.29 16.93 13:37 1.35 16.87 13:38 1.42 16.81 13:39 1.25 16.95 13:40 1.18 17.08 13:41 1.32 16.94 13:42 1.33 16.93 13:43 1.28 16.98 13:44 1.31 16.98 13:45 1.32 16.96 13:46 1.29 17.00 13:47 1.33 16.94 13:48 1.37 16.90 13:49 1.40 16.86 13:50 1.39 16.88 13:51 1.38 16.88 Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 12/15/23 28 of 65 Run 2 - RM Data Location: Source: Project No.: Date: Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet Unit % dry % dry Status Valid Valid Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)1.35 16.76 Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.96 10.91 Pretest System Zero Response 0.37 0.43 Posttest System Zero Response 0.31 0.37 Average Zero Response (Co)0.34 0.40 Pretest System Cal Response 10.75 10.88 Posttest System Cal Response 10.78 10.82 Average Cal Response (CM)10.77 10.85 Corrected Run Average (Corr)1.06 17.08 15:05 1.39 16.73 15:06 1.41 16.73 15:07 1.36 16.76 15:08 1.30 16.84 15:09 1.42 16.71 15:10 1.33 16.74 15:11 1.28 16.82 15:12 1.35 16.76 15:13 1.35 16.74 15:14 1.22 16.87 15:15 1.37 16.71 15:16 1.32 16.74 15:17 1.30 16.79 15:18 1.32 16.76 15:19 1.38 16.73 15:20 1.47 16.65 15:21 1.41 16.66 15:22 1.29 16.80 15:23 1.28 16.79 15:24 1.31 16.79 15:25 1.34 16.79 15:26 1.25 16.82 15:27 1.28 16.81 15:28 1.34 16.73 15:29 1.33 16.76 15:30 1.41 16.73 15:31 1.31 16.79 15:32 1.30 16.79 15:33 1.31 16.79 15:34 1.23 16.89 15:35 1.26 16.87 15:36 1.21 16.89 15:37 1.20 16.89 15:38 1.34 16.82 15:39 1.32 16.80 15:40 1.34 16.79 15:41 1.33 16.80 15:42 1.28 16.81 15:43 1.34 16.79 15:44 1.32 16.80 15:45 1.23 16.88 15:46 1.27 16.81 15:47 1.28 16.83 15:48 1.31 16.81 15:49 1.41 16.71 15:50 1.45 16.65 15:51 1.40 16.71 15:52 1.36 16.74 15:53 1.39 16.71 15:54 1.42 16.68 15:55 1.56 16.55 15:56 1.60 16.53 15:57 1.47 16.64 15:58 1.50 16.59 15:59 1.50 16.63 16:00 1.41 16.71 16:01 1.30 16.85 16:02 1.40 16.75 16:03 1.42 16.73 16:04 1.24 16.90 Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 12/15/23 29 of 65 Run 3 - RM Data Location: Source: Project No.: Date: Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet Unit % dry % dry Status Valid Valid Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)1.50 16.64 Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.96 10.91 Pretest System Zero Response 0.31 0.37 Posttest System Zero Response 0.38 0.43 Average Zero Response (Co)0.35 0.40 Pretest System Cal Response 10.78 10.82 Posttest System Cal Response 10.72 10.89 Average Cal Response (CM)10.75 10.86 Corrected Run Average (Corr)1.21 16.95 16:40 1.44 16.67 16:41 1.33 16.79 16:42 1.48 16.65 16:43 1.45 16.67 16:44 1.38 16.74 16:45 1.48 16.66 16:46 1.51 16.64 16:47 1.50 16.61 16:48 1.47 16.61 16:49 1.55 16.57 16:50 1.55 16.54 16:51 1.63 16.51 16:52 1.54 16.55 16:53 1.56 16.58 16:54 1.45 16.68 16:55 1.52 16.64 16:56 1.55 16.58 16:57 1.47 16.65 16:58 1.40 16.70 16:59 1.46 16.65 17:00 1.40 16.70 17:01 1.35 16.76 17:02 1.43 16.70 17:03 1.38 16.72 17:04 1.42 16.65 17:05 1.38 16.73 17:06 1.50 16.63 17:07 1.50 16.62 17:08 1.41 16.70 17:09 1.49 16.61 17:10 1.44 16.64 17:11 1.50 16.63 17:12 1.53 16.58 17:13 1.52 16.60 17:14 1.51 16.65 17:15 1.47 16.71 17:16 1.52 16.62 17:17 1.54 16.61 17:18 1.45 16.71 17:19 1.41 16.71 17:20 1.41 16.75 17:21 1.44 16.72 17:22 1.43 16.76 17:23 1.43 16.75 17:24 1.49 16.68 17:25 1.43 16.72 17:26 1.43 16.77 17:27 1.45 16.76 17:28 1.48 16.70 17:29 1.43 16.75 17:30 1.46 16.73 17:31 1.52 16.63 17:32 3.20 14.94 17:33 1.43 16.72 17:34 1.39 16.75 17:35 1.52 16.70 17:36 1.46 16.75 17:37 1.50 16.72 17:38 1.53 16.68 17:39 1.56 16.65 Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 12/15/23 30 of 65 Appendix C 31 of 65 Project No. AST-2023-4280 Alliance Technical Group, LLC Analytical Services 5530 Marshall St. Arvada, CO 80002 (720) 457-9504 www.alliancetg.com Analytical Laboratory Report Big West Oil, LLC 333 W. Center Street North Salt Lake, UT 84054 1 of 21 32 of 65 Quality Associate Date Certification Statement Alliance Source Testing, LLC (AST) has completed the analysis as described in this report. Results apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and AST is not responsible for use of less than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without written approval from the customer. To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the relevant sections on the test report. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document. Validation Signature The analytical data and all QC contained within this report was reviewed and validated by the following individual. James Davidson 2 of 21 Digitally signed by James Davidson DN: C=US, CN=James Davidson, E=james.davidson@stacktest.com Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Location: your signing location here Date: 2024.01.05 11:42:23-06'00' Foxit PDF Editor Version: 11.2.7 James Davidson 33 of 65 Project Narrative Analytical Method(s): Method 5B - Determination of Nonsulfuric Acid Particulate Emissions From Stationary Sources Method 202 - Dry Impinger Method for Determining Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions From Stationary Sources Filterable The filter(s) were either oven dried and/or desiccated per the method until a final weight was obtained. The liquid fractions were extracted if required, evaporated and cooled until a final weight was obtained. These fractions were summed together to provide the total Particulate Matter collected. Condensable The filter(s) were extracted per the method. The organic extract was added to the organic rinse, and the inorganic extract was added to the inorganic rinse. The inorganic fraction was extracted with solvent per the method. Extracts were combined with the organic rinse. The organic and inorganic fractions were evaporated and desiccated until a final weight was obtained. MDL The Minimum Detection Level (MDL) is 0.5 mg per fraction. If the measured result for a fraction is less than the MDL, the MDL was used in ensuing calculations. Blank Correction If blank correction is performed, only blank values returned higher than the MDL are used. If a blank returns a value less than the MDL, no correction is included. Custody:The samples were received by Cory Manshack on 12/22/2023 in Arvada, CO. The samples were received in good condition with proper Chain-of-Custody documentation. No apparent container problems were noted upon receipt. Prior to analysis, the samples were kept secure with access limited to authorized personnel of AST. Number of Samples:21 Labeling: Acceptable Analyst:Carson Williamson - Laboratory Analyst I Ryan Gillett-Laboratory Analyst II Equipment:Mettler Toledo Balance ML-104, SN B217893065. This scale was used for analytical determinations of filters and rinse vessels. Denver Instruments Balance TB-6201, SN 17904189. This scale was used to measure the total mass of rinse collected for blank correction. Analysis was performed on the same balance as the associated tare. Quincy Lab Inc oven, 30CG, SN G3-012673. Lab Reagents:Acetone Lot Number: 224521 Hexane Lot Number: 224540 QC Notes:The samples met the minimum criteria established by the relevant method. A blank correction was applied per the method. Reporting Notes:none 3 of 21 34 of 65 Client City, State Project No. Method Lab ID Field ID Filter ID 16971 - C 16824 - C 16938 - C Filter tare, g Date - Oven Time - Oven Date - Desiccator Time - Desiccator Date of Weighing 1/2/24 1/3/24 1/2/24 1/2/24 1/2/24 1/2/24 Time of Weighing 14:01 8:41 7:56 14:01 7:56 14:01 Filter Weight, g 0.5071 0.5073 0.4714 0.4715 0.5105 0.5104 Filter PM Mass, mg* Lab ID Field ID Beaker ID Beaker tare, g Beaker with Acetone, g Acetone Mass, g Date - Oven Time - Oven Date - Desiccator Time - Desiccator Date of Weighing 1/2/24 1/2/24 1/2/24 1/2/24 1/2/24 1/3/24 Time of Weighing 8:00 14:17 8:00 14:17 14:17 8:37 Weight, g 3.8691 3.8694 3.9506 3.9502 3.9038 3.9040 Rinse Mass, mg* Blank Corrected Total non-sulfuric PM Mass, mg 12/28/23 5:42 5:42 5:42 12/28/23 12/28/23 12/28/23 12/28/23 11:45 11:45 11:45 D39134 D39139 D39144 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.4 1.4 0.6 26.5 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 1 Cont. 1 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 2 Cont. 1 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 3 Cont. 1 5:42 5:42 5:42 12/28/23 12/28/23 12/28/23 0.5092 0.4710 0.5126 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 1 Cont. 2 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 2 Cont. 2 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 3 Cont. 2 32624 32591 32629 26.8 25.5 12/28/23 Front Half Rinse 11:45 11:45 11:45 3.8679 3.9490 3.9033 30.4 30.7 29.4 D39143 12/28/23 12/28/23 12/28/23 D39133 D39138 EPA Method 5B AST-2023-4280 North Salt Lake, UT 84054 Big West Oil, LLC Front Half Filter No 1.9 1.9 1.1 4 of 21 35 of 65 Client City, State Project No. Method Lab ID Field ID Beaker ID Beaker tare, g Beaker with Acetone, g Acetone Mass, g Date- Oven Time-Oven Date - Desiccator Time - Desiccator Date of Weighing 1/2/24 1/3/24 Time of Weighing 14:17 8:37 Weight, g 3.8696 3.8695 Blank Mass, mg* Acetone Blank EPA Method 5B AST-2023-4280 North Salt Lake, UT 84054 Big West Oil, LLC 151.17 M5B-Acetone Blank 32616 D39148 0.0 11:45 147.30 12/28/23 3.8692 12/28/23 5:42 5 of 21 36 of 65 Client City, State Project No. Method Lab ID Field ID Lab ID Field ID Beaker ID Beaker tare, g Beaker Solvent, g Solvent Mass, g Date - Desiccator Time - Desiccator Date of Weighing 12/29/23 1/2/24 12/29/23 1/2/24 12/29/23 1/2/24 Time of Weighing 8:10 8:06 8:10 8:06 8:10 8:06 Weight, g 3.9188 3.9189 3.8549 3.8551 3.8774 3.8775 Organic PM Mass, mg* Lab ID Field ID Beaker ID Beaker tare, g Beaker Water, g Water Mass, g Date - Desiccator Time - Desiccator Date of Weighing 12/29/23 1/2/24 12/29/23 1/2/24 12/29/23 1/2/24 Time of Weighing 8:59 7:50 8:59 7:50 8:59 7:50 Weight, g 88.2137 88.2136 85.6251 85.6250 64.9569 64.9570 Inorganic Mass, mg* Blank Corrected Total PM Mass, mg *All fractions were analyzed and returned values greater than the MDL of 0.5 mg. 5.2 6.3 4.0 12/28/23 12/28/23 4:24 4:24 4:24 12/28/23 12/28/23 Organic Fraction 127.7 132.1 130.9 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 1 Cont. 5 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 2 Cont. 5 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 3 Cont. 5 32637 32623 32613 D39137 D39142 D39147 Big West Oil, LLC M5B/202-MSCC-Run 1 Cont. 3 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 2 Cont. 3 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 3 Cont. 3 North Salt Lake, UT 84054 AST-2023-4280 EPA Method 202 Teflon Filter D39135 D39140 D39145 31627 123.8 128.2 127.0 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 1 Cont. 4 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 2 Cont. 4 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 3 Cont. 4 31601 31617 3.5 3.6 3.9 12/28/23 64.9549 271.2256.6 241.9 2.1 168.4 185.6 176.9 88.2100 85.6204 12/28/23 6:53 6:53 6:53 Yes 3.7 4.7 D39136 D39141 D39146 Inorganic Fraction 3.91530 3.85140 3.87355 6 of 21 37 of 65 Client City, State Project No. Method Lab ID Field ID Lab ID Field ID Beaker ID Beaker tare, g Beaker Solvent, g Solvent Mass, g Date - Desiccator Time - Desiccator Date of Weighing 1/2/24 1/3/24 1/2/24 1/2/24 Time of Weighing 8:06 10:30 8:02 14:57 Weight, g 3.9383 3.9380 3.8133 3.8129 Organic Mass, mg* Lab ID Field ID Beaker ID Beaker tare, g Beaker Water g Water Mass, g Date - Desiccator Time - Desiccator Date of Weighing 1/2/24 1/3/24 1/2/24 1/2/24 Time of Weighing 7:50 8:34 8:06 14:57 Weight, g 65.2569 65.2573 89.2970 89.2973 Inorganic Mass, mg* 163.4 118.0 31635 65.2570 89.2969 31636 M202-FT Recovery Blank Cont 4 M202-FT Proof Blank Cont. 4 Field Train Blank Proof Blank 228.7 207.3 Proof Blank D39151 0.0 0.5 6:53 6:53 12/28/23 12/28/23 Organic Fraction Blanks M202-FT Recovery Blank Cont 3 N/A Inorganic Fraction Blanks 11:45 2.0 3.8127 12/28/23 12/28/23 133.1 166.9 3.9354 Big West Oil, LLC North Salt Lake, UT 84054 AST-2023-4280 EPA Method 202 Field Train Blank Teflon Filter Blanks Field Train Blank Proof Blank N/A D39153 D39150 D39152 D39149 32588 32600 M202-FT Recovery Blank Cont 5 M202-FT Proof Blank Cont. 5 137.0 170.7 0.5 4:24 7 of 21 38 of 65 8 of 21 39 of 65 9 of 21 40 of 65 10 of 21 41 of 65 11 of 21 42 of 65 12 of 21 43 of 65 13 of 21 44 of 65 14 of 21 45 of 65 15 of 21 46 of 65 16 of 21 47 of 65 17 of 21 48 of 65 18 of 21 49 of 65 19 of 21 50 of 65 20 of 21 51 of 65 21 of 21 52 of 65 Appendix D 53 of 65 QA Data Location Source Project No. O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet Make Servomex Servomex Model 1400 1440 S/N 1420-4 1415C-2 Operating Range 25 25 Cylinder ID Zero NA NA Low NA NA Mid CC737000 CC737000 High CC721597 CC721597 Cylinder Certifed Values Zero NA NA Low NA NA Mid 10.96 10.91 High 24 23.7 Cylinder Expiration Date Zero NA NA Low NA NA Mid 9/13/31 9/13/31 High 8/16/28 8/16/28 Type of Sample Line Heated Sample Line Parameter Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 54 of 65 Calibration Data Location: Source: Project No.: Date: O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet Expected Average Concentration 5.00 17.00 Span Between Low 5.00 17.00 High 25.00 85.00 Desired Span 24.00 23.70 Low Range Gas Low NA NA High NA NA Mid Range Gas Low 9.60 9.48 High 14.40 14.22 High Range Gas Low NA NA High NA NA Actual Concentration (% or ppm) Zero 0.00 0.00 Low NA NA Mid 10.96 10.91 High 24.00 23.70 Response Time (seconds)30.00 30.00 Upscale Calibration Gas (CMA)Mid Mid Instrument Response (% or ppm) Zero 0.13 0.09 Low NA NA Mid 10.95 10.84 High 23.96 23.60 Performance (% of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.) Zero 0.54 0.38 Low NA NA Mid 0.04 0.30 High 0.17 0.42 Status Zero PASS PASS Low NA NA Mid PASS PASS High PASS PASS MSCC Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT Parameter 12/15/23 2023-4280 55 of 65 Bias/Drift Determinations Location: Source: Project No.: O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet Run 1 Date 12/15/23 Span Value 24.00 23.70 Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.13 0.09 Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.95 10.84 Pretest System Zero Response 0.37 0.37 Posttest System Zero Response 0.37 0.43 Pretest System Upscale Response 10.78 10.46 Posttest System Upscale Response 10.75 10.88 Bias (%) Pretest Zero 1.00 1.18 Posttest Zero 1.00 1.43 Pretest Span -0.71 -1.60 Posttest Span -0.83 0.17 Drift (%) Zero 0.00 0.25 Mid -0.12 1.77 Run 2 Date 12/15/23 Span Value 24.00 23.70 Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.13 0.09 Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.95 10.84 Pretest System Zero Response 0.37 0.43 Posttest System Zero Response 0.31 0.37 Pretest System Upscale Response 10.75 10.88 Posttest System Upscale Response 10.78 10.82 Bias (%) Pretest Zero 1.00 1.43 Posttest Zero 0.75 1.18 Pretest Span -0.83 0.17 Posttest Span -0.71 -0.08 Drift (%) Zero -0.25 -0.25 Mid 0.12 -0.25 Run 3 Date 12/15/23 Span Value 24.00 23.70 Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.13 0.09 Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.95 10.84 Pretest System Zero Response 0.31 0.37 Posttest System Zero Response 0.38 0.43 Pretest System Upscale Response 10.78 10.82 Posttest System Upscale Response 10.72 10.89 Bias (%) Pretest Zero 0.75 1.18 Posttest Zero 1.04 1.43 Pretest Span -0.71 -0.08 Posttest Span -0.96 0.21 Drift (%) Zero 0.29 0.25 Mid -0.25 0.30 Parameter Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 56 of 65 Balance Red Ball Technical Gas Service 555 Craig Kennedy Way Shreveport, LA 71107 800-551-8150 Accreditation #62754 PGVP Vendor ID # G12020 EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Cylinder Number:CC721597 Certification Date:08/18/2020 Product ID Number:127907 Expiration Date:08/16/2028 Cylinder Pressure:1900 PSIG MFG Facility: - Shreveport - LA COA #CC721597.20200810-0 Lot Number:CC721597.20200810 Customer PO. NO.:Tracking Number:098499520 Customer:Previous Certification Dates: This calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-12/531, using procedure G1. Do Not Use This Cylinder Below 100 psig (0.7 Megapascal). Certified Concentration(s) Component Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On Carbon Dioxide 23.7 %±0.18 %NDIR 08/17/2020 Oxygen 24.0 %±0.12 %MPA 08/18/2020 Nitrogen Analytical Measurement Data Available Online. Reference Standard(s) Serial Number Lot Expiration Type Balance Component Concentration Uncertainty(%)NIST Reference EB0041474 EB0041474.20180504 07/21/2026 GMIS N2 O2 24 %0.497 071001 EB0089906 EB0089906.20190405 12/03/2027 GMIS N2 O2 20 %0.498 2659a EB0097897 EB0097897.20171018 02/06/2026 GMIS N2 CO2 24.9 %0.398 C1309410.01 Analytical Instrumentation SMART-CERT Component Principle Make MPC Date CO2 NDIR Thermo 08/03/2020 O2 MPA Thermo 07/23/2020 Serial 1162980025 1162980025 This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to the International System of Units (SI). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball Technical Gas Services. If not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account when determining pass or fail. Jasmine Godfrey Analytical Chemist Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17 Model 410i 410i 57 of 65 Balance Red Ball Technical Gas Service 555 Craig Kennedy Way Shreveport, LA 71107 800-551-8150 Accreditation #62754 PGVP Vendor ID # G12023 EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Cylinder Number:CC737000 Certification Date:09/15/2023 Product ID Number:125371 Expiration Date:09/13/2031 Cylinder Pressure:1900 PSIG MFG Facility: - Shreveport - LA COA #CC737000.20230822-0 Lot Number:CC737000.20230822 Customer PO. NO.:Tracking Number:103891048 Customer:Previous Certification Dates: This calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-12/531, using procedure G1. Do Not Use This Cylinder Below 100 psig (0.7 Megapascal). Certified Concentration(s) Component Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On Carbon Dioxide 10.91 %±0.09 %FTIR 08/29/2023 Oxygen 10.96 %±0.02 %MPA 09/15/2023 Nitrogen Analytical Measurement Data Available Online. Reference Standard(s) Serial Number Lot Expiration Type Balance Component Concentration Uncertainty(%)NIST Reference CC737012 CC737012.20230228 07/09/2031 GMIS N2 O2 20 %0.112 SRM 2659a EB0004315 EB0004315.20201022 04/05/2030 GMIS N2 CO2 24.75 %0.237 C2190301.03 Analytical Instrumentation SMART-CERT Component Principle Make MPC Date CO2 FTIR MKS 08/29/2023 O2 MPA Thermo 09/14/2023 Serial 017146467 1162980025 This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to the International System of Units (SI). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball Technical Gas Services. If not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account when determining pass or fail. Jasmine Godfrey Analytical Chemist Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17 Model MKS 2031DJG2EKVS13T 410i 58 of 65 Location: Source: Project No.: Date: Time O2 CO2 (%) (%) A-1 11:39 1.14 16.47 2 11:40 1.10 16.55 3 11:41 1.15 16.54 1.1 16.5 Single Point Single Point Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 12/15/2023 Average Criteria Met Traverse Point 59 of 65 Response Times Location: Source: Project No.: O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet Zero 30 30 Low NA NA Mid 30 30 High 30 30 Average 30.0 30.0 Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 Parameter Response Times, seconds 60 of 65 QA/QC Data Location Source Project No. Parameter #1 #2 #3 Dn (Average)Difference 12/15/23 GL-380 0.380 0.380 0.380 0.380 0.000 glass 12/15/23 Pr709-1 no no no Date Probe or Thermocouple ID Reference Temp. (°F) Indicated Temp. (°F)Difference Criteria Probe Length 12/15/23 Pr709-1 250.0 250.0 0.0%9 ' Date 12/15/23 Balance ID:ML058 SCALE Certified Weight ID:SLC-1 KG-1 Certified Weight (g):1000.0 Measured Weight (g):999.9 Weight Difference (g):0.1 ---------- 12/15/23 Weather Station NA NA NA 12/15/23 M5-9 ACETONE 216543 No HEXANE 211034 No DI WATER 231106 No Flow Rate (lpm):14 Flow Rate (lpm):14 Flow Rate (lpm):14 Clock Time Temperature Clock Time Temperature Clock Time Temperature 14:20 70.0 16:30 68.0 17:55 71.0 14:35 70.0 16:45 68.0 18:10 71.0 14:50 71.0 17:00 69.0 18:25 71.0 15:05 71.0 17:15 69.0 18:40 70.0 15:20 71.0 17:30 70.0 18:55 70.0 ± 1.5 % (absolute) Reagent ByDateField LotField Prep performedLot# Date Barometric Pressure Evidence of damage?Reading Verified Calibration or Repair required? Posttest Purge Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Material Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check Pass ≤ 0.004 in. Date Pitot ID Evidence of damage? Weather Station Location Salt Lake City, UT Evidence of mis-alignment? Calibration or Repair required? Field Balance Check Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT MSCC 2023-4280 Nozzle Diameter (in.) Date Nozzle ID Criteria PM/CPM 61 of 65 Document ID 620.004 Revision 23.0 Effective Date 1/25/23 Issuing Department Page 1 of 1 Console ID: Meter S/N: Critical Orifice S/N: (PbI) (PbF) (Pb) (Y)1330-31 1330-31 1330-25 1330-25 1330-19 1330-19 (K')0.8429 0.8429 0.6728 0.673 0.5186 0.519 (VP)13.0 13.0 15.0 15.0 16.0 16.0 Initial DGM Volume, ft3 (VmI)60.233 72.479 90.179 111.485 121.102 128.055 Final DGM Volume, ft3 (VmF)71.254 83.508 98.955 120.285 128.055 134.893 Total DGM Volume, ft3 (Vm)11.021 11.029 8.776 8.800 6.953 6.838 Ambient Temperature, °F (Ta)71 71 72 72 73 71 Initial DGM Temperature, °F (TmI)68 68 70 71 71 72 Final DGM Temperature, °F (TmF)68 69 71 71 72 73 Average DGM Temperature, °F ( Tm)68 69 71 71 72 73 Elapsed Time (Θ)10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (ΔH)3.40 3.40 2.10 2.10 1.30 1.30 Standard Meter volume, ft3 (Vmstd)9.6065 9.6044 7.5857 7.5992 5.9850 5.8750 Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ft3 (Vcr)9.4492 9.4492 7.5352 7.5352 5.8028 5.8137 Meter Correction Factor (Y)0.984 0.984 0.993 0.992 0.970 0.990 Tolerance --0.002 0.001 0.008 0.006 0.016 0.004 Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @)1.867 1.865 1.798 1.797 1.869 1.859 Tolerance --0.025 0.023 0.044 0.046 0.027 0.016 Orifice Cal Check -- Meter Correction Factor (Y) Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @) Accuracy Difference oF oR oF oR %oF 0 460 2 462 -0.4 2 68 528 68 528 0.0 0 100 560 100 560 0.0 0 223 683 225 685 -0.3 2 248 708 250 710 -0.3 2 273 733 275 735 -0.3 2 300 760 302 762 -0.3 2 400 860 401 861 -0.1 1 500 960 500 960 0.0 0 600 1,060 601 1,061 -0.1 1 700 1,160 703 1,163 -0.3 3 800 1,260 803 1,263 -0.2 3 900 1,360 903 1,363 -0.2 3 1,000 1,460 1,004 1,464 -0.3 4 1,100 1,560 1,103 1,563 -0.2 3 1,200 1,660 1,203 1,663 -0.2 3 Calibration Date: Stacey CunninghamReviewed By: RYAN LYONSCalibration By: 10/30/2023 Equipment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor Reference Temp.Display Temp. OMEGA T-197207 Personnel Reference Calibrator Make: Reference Calibrator Model: Reference Calibrator S/N: Calibration Detail K' Factor, ft3·R1/2 / in. WC·min CL23A Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg Initial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg Final Barometric Pressure, in. Hg Average Barometric Pressure, in. Hg Critifcal Orifice ID Calibration Detail M5-9 20035541 1330 Positive Pressure Leak Check Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter 0.985 1.843 Yes 0.88 1.32 1.30 DGM Calibration-Orifices Tech Services 25.84 25.81 25.83 62 of 65 Appendix E 63 of 65 Bi g W e s t O i l , L L C MS C C S t a c k T e s t R e s u l t s BW O I n s t r . B W O I n s t r . B W O I n s t r . B W O I n s t r . M e t h o d 2 § 6 0 . 1 0 6 ( b ) ( 3 ) CO C O 2 O 2 Q a Q r K 1 K 2 K 3 R - c pp m v d % v , d r y % v , d r y D S C F M D S C F M C o k e B u r n Ru n 1 2 8 . 1 1 1 7 . 4 1 . 1 22 , 5 6 7 34 9 1 7 11 2 8 9 2 9 4 0 4 0 3 1 1 0 , 1 9 9 Ru n 2 2 7 . 6 5 1 7 . 4 1 . 2 22 , 5 7 9 33 9 9 7 10 9 8 4 2 9 4 2 3 9 2 9 9 , 9 9 6 Ru n 3 2 4 . 2 6 1 7 . 3 1 . 3 22 , 7 0 8 34 5 1 8 11 0 8 7 2 9 5 9 3 9 9 4 1 0 , 0 5 2 Qr = V o l u m e t r i c f l o w r a t e o f e x h a u s t g a s f r o m F C C U r e g e n e r a t o r b e f o r e a n y e m i s s i o n s c o n t r o l o r e n e r g y r e c o v e r y s y s t e m t h a t b u r n s a u x i l i a r y f u e l ( d s c f / m i n ) . A l l i a n c e , M e t h o d 2 a t t h e S t a c k Qa = V o l u m e t r i c f l o w r a t e o f a i r t o F C C U r e g e n e r a t o r . B W O I n s t r u m e n t a t i o n (d s c f / m i n ) Qo x y = V o l u m e t r i c f l o w r a t e o f O 2 e n r i c h e d a i r t o F C C U r e g e n e r a t o r . A l w a y s 0 . (d s c f / m i n ) %O o x y = O 2 C o n c e n t r a t i o n i n O 2 e n r i c h e d a i r s t r e a m i n l e t t o t h e F C C U r e g e n e r a t o r . A l w a y s 0 . %O 2 = O 2 C o n c e n t r a t i o n i n t h e F C C U r e g e n b u r n e r e x h a u s t . A l l i a n c e , M e t h o d 3 A pp m C O = C O c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n F C C U r e g e n b u r n e r e x h a u s t . B W O I n s t r u m e n t a t i o n %C O 2 = C O 2 c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n F C C U r e g e n b u r n e r e x h a u s t . A l l i a n c e , M e t h o d 3 A Ma t e r i a l b a l a n c e a n d c o n v e r s i o n f a c t o r s : K1 = 0 . 0 1 8 6 ( l b - m i n ) / ( h r - d s c f - % ) K2 = 0 . 1 3 0 3 ( l b - m i n ) / ( h r - d s c f - % ) K3 = 0 . 0 0 6 2 4 ( l b - m i n ) / ( h r - d s c f - % ) R- c = K 1 Q r ( % C O 2 + % C O ) + K 2 Q a - K 3 Q r ( % C O / 2 + % C O 2 + % O 2 ) + K 3 Q o x y ( % O o x y ) 64 of 65 Last Page of Report 65 of 65 Source Information Division of Air Quality Compliance Demonstration Source Information Company Name Big West Oil, LLC - MSCC Company Contact:Brady Miller Contact Phone No.385-324-1275 Source Designation:MSCC Test & Review Dates Test Date: 12/5/2023 Review Date: 2/5/2024 Tabs Are Shown Observer: Reviewer:Paul Morris Particulate Emission Limits lbs/MMBtu lbs/hr gr/dscf Emission Rates - "Front Half" lbs/MMBtu lbs/hr gr/dscf 0.2051 0.0007 Test Information Stack_I.D._inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)Dn 91.50 45.66 0.9850 1.843 0.84 26.08 0.07 0.38 Contractor Information Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC Contact: Shamit Nakra Phone No.: 385-252-7553 Project No.: Circular 10100 9780 9860 9190 8710 8710 8710 10540 10640 11950 320 10610 10200 10390 1970 1800 1910 1420 1040 1190 1250 F factor usedF factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas Anthrocite 2 Lignite Natural Propane Butane COAL OIL GAS Bituminous 2 Fd Fw Fc scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu O2 CO2 lbs/MMBtu Page 1 Summary Division of Air Quality Reference Methods 5 - TSP Compliance Demonstration of Big West Oil, LLC - MSCC Testing Results Lab Data - grams collected Test Date 12/15/2023 12/15/2023 12/15/2023 12/15/2023 Lab Data Probe Filter Back Circular Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 1 0.0014 0.0005 0.0052 As ft^2 45.66 45.66 45.66 Run 2 0.0014 0.0005 0.0063 Pbar 26.08 26.08 26.08 Run 3 0.0006 0.0005 0.004 Pq (static)0.07 0.07 0.07 Run 4 Ps 26.09 26.09 26.09 Avg. Ts F 499.58 498.83 499.50 Front Half Emissions Summary CO2 - FCO2 17.00 17.00 17.00 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Avg. O2 1.50 1.50 1.50 gr./dscf 0.0008 0.0008 0.0005 0.0007 N2+C 81.50 81.50 81.50 lbs/hr 0.2392 0.2370 0.1392 0.2051 Md 30.78 30.78 30.78 lb/1000lbs Coke 0.0235 0.0237 0.0138 0.0203 Ms 29.61 29.43 29.53 Y 0.99 0.99 0.99 Cp 0.84 0.84 0.84 Total Emissions Summary w/back half condensable Vm cf 42.03 41.36 41.37 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Avg. Vlc 78.60 90.20 83.30 gr./dscf 0.0030 0.0035 0.0022 0.0029 AVG. Tm F 60.17 61.29 60.67 lbs/hr 0.8938 1.0230 0.6453 0.8540 Vm std 36.76 36.10 36.15 lb/1000lbs Coke 0.0876 0.1023 0.0642 0.0847 Vw std 3.70 4.25 3.92 Bws 0.09 0.11 0.10 S Bws 1.00 1.00 1.00 Avg. Sqrt Dlp 0.37 0.36 0.36 Vs 29.29 28.92 29.15 F factor used scfm wet 38499.19 38039.88 38320.58 acfm 80254.17 79234.74 79874.92 Qsd dscfh 2098727.32 2042182.25 2074241.06 # Sample Points 12.00 12.00 12.00 Dn 0.380 0.380 0.380 An 7.88E-04 7.88E-04 7.88E-04 Start Time 0:00 0:00 0:00 End Time 0:00 0:00 0:00 Total Test time 60.00 60.00 60.00 Time @ point 5.00 5.00 5.00 Coke Burn off Rate lb/hr 10199 9996 10052 80.00 90.00 100.00 110.00 120.00 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 % I s o k i n e t i c Points Run 1 PxP Isokinetic 80.00 90.00 100.00 110.00 120.00 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 % I s o k i n e t i c Sample Points Run 2 PxP Isokinetic 80.00 90.00 100.00 110.00 120.00 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 % I s o k i n e t i c Sample Points Run 3 PxP Isokinetic O2 CO2 lbs/MMBtu 80.00 90.00 100.00 110.00 120.00 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 Sample Points Run 4 PxP Isokinetic Page 1 Run 1 Big West Oil, LLC - MSCC Flow & Moisture Test Date 12/15/2023 As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms 45.66 26.08 0.07 26.09 500 17.00 1.50 81.50 30.78 29.61 Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 55.5183 0.9850 0.84 42.026 78.60 60.17 36.760 3.700 0.0914 0.9990 0.999 Avg. Sqrt Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh # Sample Points Dn Total Test time (minutes) Time @ point (minutes)Avg. Dlh 0.366 29.29 38,499 80,254 2.10E+06 12 0.38 60 5.00 1.441667 TRUE Point No.Meter (cf) dl "p" dl "h" ts F tm F (in) tm F (out) Imp. Liquid Collected 1 85.750 0.11 1.20 500 48 66 Wt. (Final) Wt. (Initial) lc 2 88.875 0.12 1.30 496 50 67 553.60 490.90 62.7 3 92.235 0.13 1.40 499 50 68 641.10 637.50 3.6 4 95.660 0.14 1.50 500 50 68 687.70 689.90 -2.2 5 99.225 0.15 1.60 502 50 69 963.80 949.30 14.5 6 102.920 0.14 1.50 502 54 68 0.0 7 106.515 0.13 1.40 498 55 67 8 109.980 0.13 1.40 498 55 66 Isokinetics 101.6 9 113.420 0.15 1.60 499 56 66 Test Date 12/15/2023 10 117.130 0.14 1.50 500 56 67 Start Time enter 11 120.710 0.14 1.50 500 55 67 End Time 12 124.285 0.13 1.40 501 57 69 Run 1 13 127.776 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Page 1 Run 2 Big West Oil, LLC - MSCC Flow & Moisture Test Date 12/15/2023 As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms 45.66 26.08 0.07 26.09 499 17.00 1.50 81.50 30.78 29.43 Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 55.1392 0.9850 0.84 41.360 90.20 61 36.095 4.246 0.1052 0.9990 0.999 Avg. Sqrt Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh # Sample Points Dn Total Test time (minutes) Time @ point (minutes)Avg. Dlh 0.360 28.92 38,040 79,235 2.04E+06 12 0.38 60 5.00 1.40 TRUE Point No.Meter (cf) dl "p" dl "h" ts F tm F (in) tm F (out) Imp. Liquid Collected 1 130.895 0.14 1.50 496.0 54.0 65.0 Wt. (Final) Wt. (Initial) lc 2 134.475 0.13 1.40 499.0 55.0 65.0 541.70 475.60 66.1 3 137.825 0.14 1.50 495.0 55.0 66.0 657.80 645.20 12.6 4 141.425 0.13 1.40 498.0 56.0 66.0 718.70 718.40 0.3 5 144.885 0.12 1.30 499.0 56.0 67.0 927.20 916.00 11.2 6 148.200 0.12 1.30 499.0 56.0 67.0 0.0 7 151.520 0.12 1.30 500.0 57.0 66.0 8 154.865 0.13 1.40 501.0 57.0 66.0 Isokinetics 102.5 9 158.310 0.13 1.40 500.0 58.0 66.0 Test Date 12/15/2023 10 161.740 0.14 1.50 499.0 58.0 66.0 Start Time 11 165.335 0.14 1.50 500.0 59.0 65.0 End Time 12 168.945 0.12 1.30 500.0 60.0 65.0 Run 2 13 172.255 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Page 1 Run 3 Big West Oil, LLC - MSCC Flow & Moisture Test Date 12/15/2023 As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms 45.66 26.08 0.07 26.09 500 17.00 1.50 81.50 30.78 29.53 Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 55.4761 0.9850 0.84 41.367 83.30 61 36.147 3.921 0.0979 0.9990 0.999 Avg. Sqrt Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh # Sample Points Dn Total Test time (minutes) Time @ point (minutes)Avg. Dlh 0.364 29.15 38,321 79,875 2.07E+06 12 0.38 60 5.00 1.43 TRUE Point No.Meter (cf) dl "p" dl "h" ts F tm F (in) tm F (out) Imp. Liquid Collected 1 172.519 0.13 1.40 497.0 51.0 68.0 Wt. (Final) Wt. (Initial) lc 2 176.000 0.14 1.50 499.0 51.0 68.0 560.0 491.8 68.2 3 179.550 0.15 1.60 499.0 52.0 68.0 643.5 640.0 3.5 4 183.240 0.13 1.40 500.0 52.0 67.0 689.1 687.7 1.4 5 186.660 0.12 1.30 500.0 53.0 67.0 974.0 963.8 10.2 6 189.930 0.13 1.40 502.0 55.0 67.0 0.0 7 193.335 0.12 1.30 500.0 55.0 66.0 8 196.615 0.12 1.30 501.0 56.0 66.0 Isokinetics 101.1 9 199.885 0.13 1.40 500.0 56.0 66.0 Test Date 12/15/2023 10 203.280 0.13 1.40 499.0 57.0 67.0 Start Time 11 206.675 0.15 1.60 498.0 57.0 67.0 End Time 12 210.335 0.14 1.50 499.0 58.0 66.0 Run 3 13 213.886 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Page 1