HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRC-2012-002583 - 0901a0688033fa63DRC-2012-002583
ENERGYFUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
225 Union Blvd Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www energyfuels com
VIA EMAIL AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
December 26, 2012
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Director of the Utah Division of Radiation Control
State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4850
Re. White Mesa Uranium Mill
Utah Ground Water Discharge Permit No. UGW3700004
White Mesa Uranium Mill - Notice Pursuant to Parts IE 8 c) and IG 3 of the Permit
Dear Mr Lundberg
Pjease take notice pursuant to Parts IE 8.c) and IG 3 of the White Mesa Mill's (the "Mill's") State of
^Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No UGW370004 (the "Perimt"), that Energy Fuels Resources
(USA) Inc ("EFRP'), as operator of the Mill and holder of the Permit, identified and repaired damage to
the Cell 4A Liner System as descnbed in more detail below
Repairs to the Imer were completed and tested on December 20 and 21, 2012, in accordance with
Section 9 4 of the approved June 2007 Geosyntec Consultants Cell 4A Construction Quality Assurance
Plan. The cell remained in service during and after the repairs
1. Facts and Background Information
a) Part LE 8 c) of the Penmt requires that the licensee conduct daily inspections for each of the
tailings cells and weekly inspections of Roberts Pond According to Part IE 8 c)
" all repairs to the liner shall be completed in accordance with Section 9.4 of the
approved June 2007 Geosyntec Consultants Cell 4A Construction Quality Assurance
Plan as found in Table 5 of this Permit The Liner Repair Report shall be submitted
to for [sic] Director approval m accordance with Part IF 3 of the Permit. Repairs
shall be performed by qualified liner repair personnel and shall be reported in a Liner
Repair Report, certified by a Utah licensed Professional Engineer Any leak, hole or
other damage to the liner will be reported to the Director pursuant to the requirements
found m part IG 3 "
b) Although Part l.G 3 of the Penmt is stated to apply to circumstances where the Permittee
Letter to Rusty Lundberg
December 26, 2012
Page 2 of4
fails to maintain Discharge Minimization Technology ("DMT") or Best Available
Technology ("BAT") standards. Part LE 8 c) requires that the notification provisions of
Part IG 3 also apply to liner defects or damage, regardless of whether or not the liner
defect or damage constitutes a failure of DMT or BAT. Under Part IG 3, the Permittee is
required to subimt to the Director a notification and descnption of the defect or damage
orally within 24-hours of the Permittee's discovery, followed by wntten notification within
five calendar days."
c) The Mill expenenced freezing temperatures for most of the week of December 17, 2012
Temperatures reached single digits on December 19, 2012
d) On December 19, 2012 a transformer supplying power to the Cell 1 area failed The imll
managed this power interruption by temporary installation of two portable generators on
December 20, 2012 This incident was descnbed in EFRI's telephone notification to DRC on
December 19, 2012, and wntten notice of December 21, 2012
e) Several times on December 20, 2012, power to several of the tailings cells was temporanly
interrupted and restored several times The interruptions, which were of bnef duration, did not
last long enough to interrupt required monitonng activities or require reporting to DRC
However the interruptions required considerable additional maintenance activity on and near
the cell dikes to
(i) inspect transformers,
(u) inspect and replace power lines on and near the cells,
(in) inspect momtonng devices and transfer lines for potential freezing dunng the bnef,
recurring power outages.
f) In the late afternoon of December 20, 2012, maintenance identified a minor tear in the Imer of
Cell 4A near the center of the north dike, above the level of any tailings sands
2. Actions taken
The following actions were taken following identification of the liner tear
a) Mill maintenance personnel immediately repaired and tested the Cell 4A liner on December
20, 2012.
b) On December 21, 2012, dunng the moming status update addressing power issues and repair
activities in the tailings area. Mill maintenance advised Mill environmental personnel that a
liner tear had been identified and had been repaired late on December 20, 2012
c) Dunng a regular update of Mill power loss response activities on December 21, 2012, Mill
environmental personnel advised Corporate Environmental personnel of the liner tear and
repair.
Letter to Rusty Lundberg
December 26, 2012
Page 3 of 4
d) Initial notice of this outage was given by telephone to Mr. Ryan Johnson of DRC at
approximately 3 25pm on Fnday December 21, 2012 (within 24 hours of Corporate personnel
receiving notice, and within 24 hours of Mill environmental personnel receiving notice)
3. Actions Taken to Prevent a Recurrence of This Incident
The following actions will be taken to prevent a reoccurrence of this incident.
As discussed above, the liner tear was identified, and likely occurred due to, the period of increased
maintenance activity associated with response to freeze-related failures of older power equipment The
older power transformers have been replaced with new and/or upgraded equipment. Affected older
power lines installations have been upgraded by re-installing the power lines inside HDPE pipe conduit
for additional protection from traffic and weather
It is anticipated that these provisions will prevent a recurrence of the multiple simultaneous failures that
required traffic on the liner dunng December 19 through 21, 2012
4. Required Reporting
As required by Part I E.8 c) of the penmt and by the approved June 2007 Geosyntec Consultants Cell 4A
Construction Quality Assurance Plan, a repair report will be submitted to the Director with the next
quarterly DMT Report following completion of the repairs. Repairs were completed dunng the fourth
quarter of 2012 The repair report will be submitted with the fourth quarter 2012 DMT Report on or
before March 1, 2013 The repair report will contain, m addition to a root cause analysis, the following
elements
• Repair narrative descnbing the nature of the damage and the repair work completed to repair the
damage
Repair matenal type used to complete the repair
Repair matenal descnption
Post repairs test specifications
Test Methods (ASTM or other)
Daily reports dunng the repair work
Repair test results
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Information
5. Affirmative Defense
EFR does not believe that identification of a defect or damage to the Cell 4A Imer caused by
maintenance activities and repair of such defect or damage in accordance with the Mill's Liner
Maintenance Provisions constitutes a failure of BAT under the Permit Further, the damage to the Cell
4A liner was above the level of any tailings contained m the cell As a result, EFR is not making a claim
for an affirmative defense under Part LG 3 of the Permit
Letter to Rusty Lundberg
December 26, 2012
Page 4 of 4
If you have any questions, please contact me at (303) 389-4132
Yours very truly,
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Jo Ann Tischler
Manager, Compliance and Licensing
cc David C Frydenlund
Phil Goble, DRC
Dean Henderson, DRC
Dan HiUsten
Harold R Roberts
David E Turk
Kathy Wemel