DAQ-2024-004310

1

DAQC-1316-23
Site ID: 10119 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: December 6, 2023

SUBJECT: Location: 685 South Chevron Way, North Salt Lake, Salt Lake County, Utah
Contact: Tony Pollock – 801-539-7162
Tester: Alliance Technical Group, LLC.
Source: Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU)
FRS ID #: UT0000004901100003
Permit# AO DAQE-AN101190106-22
Subject: Review of Pretest Protocol dated November 14, 2023

On November 24, 2023, the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a protocol for testing of the
Chevron Products Company’s FCCU, located at the Salt Lake Refinery in Salt Lake City, Utah. Testing
will be performed December 18-19, 2023, to determine compliance with AO Conditions II.B.1.f, II.B.1.g,
and II.B.7.d for PM emissions.

PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:

1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses; OK
2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate; OK
3. RM 3A used to determine dry molecular weight of the gas stream; OK
4. RM 4 used to determine stack gas moisture concentration; OK
5. RM 201A/202 used to determine PM concentration of emissions; OK
DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted.

CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: Send protocol review and test date confirmation notice.

ATTACHMENTS: Chevron stack test protocol dated November 14, 2023.

6 , 3
Clruroov
November 14,2023
Certified Mail70l8 0680 0001 4890 0178
Mr. Bryce Bird, Division Director
utah Air Quality Board NoV 2 4 2A23
P.O. Box 144820
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-8420 DIVISION OF AIR OUALIIY
2023 FCC Catalyst Regenerator Vent PMro.
Dear Mr. Bird,
Per R307-165-3, this letter serves as notification for the following activity at the Chevron Salt Lake
Refinery:
o FCC Regenerator Vent PMro
Chevron has scheduled this test for the week of December 18,2023
lf you have any questions, please contact Tony Pollock at [phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,,*ru"il/
Lauren Vander Werff
Attachment: Stack Test Protocol
Lauren Vander Werff Salt Lake Refinery
Environmental Team Lead Chevron Products Company
2351 North 1100 Weit
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
UTAH DEPAFTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL OUAUTY
AIlmre
Site Specific Test Plan
Chevron Corporation
685 South Chevron Way
North Salt Lake. uT 84054
UTAH D[PARTtulEr\tT OF
ENVtfiOt,tMa:NTAL eUAL,Ty
DiVISiON OF AIR QUALITV
Source to be Tested: One (1) Fluidized Catalytic Cracking
(FCC) Unit
Proposed Test Dates: December l8-19,2023
Project No. AST-2023 -4659
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Resulatorv Information
Permit No.
Source Information
DAQE-ANl0tt90t06-22
Source Name
One (l) Fluidized Catalytic Cracking (FCC) Unit
Contact Information
Targel Parameler
PMlO
Test Localion
Chevron Corporation
2351 North I100 West
Salt Lake City, UT 841l6
Facility Contact
Tony Pollock
[e-mail]
(80r) 539-7162
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
charles.horton@alliancetg. com
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Ryan Lyons
ryan. [e-mail]
(708) 2144850
(subject to change)
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie.shonk@al liancetg.com
(8t2) 4s2-478s
Test Plan/Report Coordinator
Sarah Perry
[e-mail]
Analytical Laboratory
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
5530 Marshall Street
Arvada, CO 80002
Eric Grosjean
eric.grosj [e-mail]
(303) 420-s949
AST-202345s9 Chevron - Salt Lake City, UT 2 of22
piltffiipe
Site Specific Test Plan
Table of ContentsTECIJNICAL GFOUP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.0 Summar of Test Program........ ......2-l
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded ............... ..................2-l
2.3 Proposed Test Schedule .............2-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate.....3-l
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide......... ......................... 3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content......... .................... 3-l
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 20lA and 202-PIll <10 microns. .......3-2
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 313A.......................................3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-l: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule ......................2-l
LIST OF APPENDICES
AppendixA Method I Data
Appendix B Example Field Data Sheets
AST-2023-4659 Chevron- Salt Lake City, UT 3 of22
AI Site Specific Test Plan
lntroduclion
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Chevron Products Company (Chevron) to conduct
compliance testing at the Salt Lake City, Utah facility. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of the Utah
Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Permit No. DAQE-ANI01190106-22.
Testing will be conducted to determine the emission rate of particulate matter less than l0 microns (PMl0) at the
exhaust of one (l) Fluidized Catalytic Cracking (FCC) unit.
This site-specific test plan (SSTP) has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of the
UDAQ permit.
l.l Facility Descriptions
Chevron Salt Lake Refinery is a petroleum refinery with a nominal capacity of approximately 50,000 barrels per day
of crude oil. The source consists of one FCC unit, a delayed coking unit, a catalytic reforming unit, hydrotreating
units and two sulfur recovery units. The source also has assorted heaters, boilers, cooling towers, storage tanks,
flares, and similar fugitive emissions. The refinery operates with a flare gas recovery system on two of its three
hydrocarbon flares.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table.
FlalGe
, r.i ll (l ll l)
Table l-l: Project Team
1.3 Safety Requirements
Testing personnel will undergo site-specific safety training for all applicable areas upon arrival at the site. Alliance
personnel will have current OSHA or MSHA safety training and be equipped with hard hats, safety glasses with side
shields, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fire resistant clothing, and fall protection (including shock
corded lanyards and full-body harnesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves in a manner consistent with
Client and Alliance's safety policies.
A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader.
Chevron Personnel
Tony Pollock
[e-mail]
(80r) 539-7r62
Regulatory Agency UDAQ
Alliance Personnel
Ryan Lyons
[e-mail]
(708) 214-48s0
other field personnel assigned at time of testing event
AST-20234659 Chevron - Salt Lake City. UT 4 of22
c NICA \f R P Site Srycific Test Plan
Swnmary* of Test Programs
2.0 Summary of Test Progrrm
To satisfu the requirements of the UDAQ permit, the facility will conduct a performance test program to determine
the compliance status of one (l) FCC unit.
2.1 General Description
All testing will be performed in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods l, 2,
313A,4 and20lN202. Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program. The
following is a summary of the test objectives.
Testing will be performed to demonstrate compliance with the UDAQ Permit.
Emissions testing will be conducted on the exhaust of one (l) FCC unit.
Performance testing will be conducted at the maximum normal operation load for the source.
Each of the three (3) test runs will be approximately 60-90 minutes in duration.
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded
Plant personnel will collect operational and parametric data during the testing. The following list identifies the
measurements, observations and records that will be collected during the testing program:
Coke Burn-Off
Fuel Consumption
2.3 Proposed Test Schedule
Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program.
Table 2-l: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule
UoH
a
a
a
a
a
a
DAY I -December 18,2023
Equipment Setup & Pretest QA/QC Checks
DAY 2-December 19,2023
One (l) FCC Unit 60-90 mins
20tA / 202
DAY3-December20,2023
Contingency Day (if needed)
AST-2023-4659 Chevron - Salt Lake City, UT 5 of22
2.4 Emission Limits
Emission limits for each pollutant are below.
Table 2-2; Emission Limits
2.5 Test Report
The final test report must be submitted within 60 days of the completion of the performance test and will include the
following information.
o Introductior - Brief discussion of project scope of work and activities.
c Results and Discussion - A summary of test results and process/control system operational data with
comparison to regulatory requirements or vendor guarantees along with a description of process conditions
and/or testing deviations that may have affected the testing results.
o Methodolog - A description of the sampling and analytical methodologies.
o Sample Calculations - Example calculations for each target parameter.
o Field Dala - Copies of actual handwritten or electronic field data sheets.
o Laboratory Data- Copies of laboratory report(s) and chain of custody(s).
c Quality Control Data - Copies of all instrument calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates.
t Process Operating/Control System Data - Process operating and control system data (as provided by
Chevron) to support the test results.
AST-20234659 Chevron- Salt Lake City, UT 6 of22
Gl'lo U P
Site Specific Test Plan
Testins Methodolom'
3.0 Testing Methodology
This section provides a description of the sampling and analytical procedures for each test method that will be
employed during the test program. All equipment, procedures and quality assurance measures necessary for the
completion of the test program meet or exceed the specifications of each relevant test method. The emission testing
program will be conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodology
All stack diameters, depths, widths, upstream and downstream disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be
measured on site with a verification measurement provided by the Field Team Leader.
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points will be selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method L To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances will be equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure l-l (for isokinetic sampling) and/or
Figure l-2 (measuring velocity alone) in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l.
Full velocity traverses will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system will consist of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature will be measured with a K-
type thermocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings will be recorded during each test run. The data collected will
be utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (O:) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3/3A. One (l) integrated Tedlar bag samplq will be collected during each test run. The bags will be
collected from the positive pressure side of the sample pump and conditioner. They will be collected through a
manifold with a restriction (either rotometer or critical orifice) to ensure even filling throughout the course of the
run. Samples will be concurrent with the test runs. The bag samples will be analyzed on site with a gas analyzer.
The remaining stack gas constituent will be assumed to be nitrogen for the stack gas molecular weight
determination. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.5.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content will be determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train will consist of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger will be filled with a
Volumetric Flow Rate Full Velocity Traverses
Integrated Bag / Instrumental Analysis
Gravimetric Analysis
Particulate Matter less than 10 microns Constant Rate Sampling
AST-20234659 Chevron - Salt Lake City, UT 7 of22
-iIorrNlcAL GnnuP Site Specirtc Tesl Plan
Testins Methodolosy-
known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger will be analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run
on the same analytical balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 201A, and202 - PM <10 microns
The PMl0 testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 20lA and 202. The
complete sampling system will consist of a stainless-steel nozzle, PMl0 in-stack cyclone, in-stack filter holder, pre-
weighed quartz filter, heated glass-lined probe extension, un-weighed Teflon filter, gas conditioning train, pump and
calibrated dry gas meter. The gas conditioning train will consist of a coiled condenser and four (4) chilled
impingers. The first and second impingers will be initially empty, the third will contain 100 mL of de-ionized water
and the last impinger will contain 200-300 grams of silica gel. The un-weighed 90 mm Teflon filter will be placed
befween the second and third impinger. The probe liner heating system will be maintained at a temperature of 248
+25"F , and the impinger temperature will be maintained at 68oF or less throughout testing. The temperature of thg
Teflon filter will be maintained greater than 65oF but less than or equal to 85oF.
Following the completion of each test run, the sampling train will be leak checked at a vacuum pressure greater than
or equal to the highest vacuum pressure observed during the run. The nitrogen purge will be omitted due to minimal
condensate collected in the dry impingers. After the leak check the impinger contents will be measured for moisture
gain. If condensate will be collected in the first dry impinger, then the front-half of the sample train (the nozzle,
probe, and heated pre-weighed filter) and the coil condenser will be removed, and a glass bubbler will be connected
to the first impinger. If needed, de-ionized ultra-filtered (DIUF) water will be added to the first impinger to raise the
water level above the bubbler. Zero nitrogen will be connected to the bubbler, and a 60-minute purge at l4 liters per
minute will be conducted. After the completion of the nitrogen purge the impinger contents will be measured for
moisture gain.
The pre-weighed quartz filter will be carefully removed and placed in container I . The front half of the filter holder
and back-half of the PMl0 cyclone will be rinsed six (6) times with acetone to remove any adhering particulate
matter, and these rinses will be recovered in container 2. All containers will be sealed, labeled and liquid levels
marked for transport to the identified laboratory for filterable particulate matter analysis.
The contents of impingers I and 2 will be recovered in container CPM Cont. # I . The back half of the filterable PM
filter holder, probe extension, coil condenser, impingers I and 2 and all connecting glassware will be rinsed with
DIUF water and then rinsed with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinses will be added to container CPM
Cont. # I while the solvent rinses will be recovered in container CPM Cont. #2. The Teflon filter will be removed
from the filter holder and placed in container CPM Cont. #3. The front half of the condensable PM filter holder will
be rinsed with DIUF water and then with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinse will be added to container
CPM Cont. #l while the solvent rinses will be added to container CPM Cont. #2. All containers will be sealed,
labeled and liquid levels marked for transport to the identified laboratory for condensable particulate matter analysis.
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A
Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol I (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates
will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report.
Low Level gas will be introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will be recorded. This process will be
repeated for the High Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases will be
AST-20234659 Chevron - Salt Lake City, UT 8 of22
AItfu Sile Specific Tesl Plan
Testinq MethodologyTECFINICAL GFOUP
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. The Calibration Error for each gas must be within 2.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5% absolute difference.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup will be used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data will be continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At
the completion of testing, the data will also be saved to the Alliance server. All data will be reviewed by the Field
Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data will be
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review will be performed by the Project Manager.
AST-20234659 Chevron - Salt Lake City, UT 9 of22
putfrrue
Site Spectfc Test Plan
Ouolih' Assurance Prosram
TICIINIOAL GFOLJP
4.0 Quality Assurance Program
Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Management Plan to ensure the
continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and
procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme.
Adherence to prescribed procedures is quite often the most applicable QC check.
4.1 Equipment
Field test equipment is assigned a unique, permanent identification number. Prior to mobilizing for the test
program, equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipment problems prior to arriving on site. This
minimizes lost time on the job site due to equipment failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is
unavoidable despite the most rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures. Therefore, replacements for critical
equipment or components are brought to the job site. Equipment returning from the field is inspected before it is
returned to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and
recalibrated where necessary.
Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. The
calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA-600/R-94/038c, September 1994\ are utilized.
When these methods are inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recognized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked
for completeness and accuracy. Copies of calibration forms are included in the report.
The following sections elaborate on the calibration procedures followed by Alliance for these items of equipment.
o Dry Gas Meter and Orifice. A full meter calibration using critical orifices as the calibration standard is
conducted at least semi-annually, more frequently if required. The meter calibration procedure determines
the meter correction factor 1Y) and the meter's orifice pressure differential (AH@). Alliance uses approved
Alternative Method 009 as a post-test calibration check to ensure that the correction factor has not changed
more than 57o since the last full meter calibration. This check is performed after each test series.
o Pitot Tubes and Manometers. Type-S pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria required by U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.84 unless a specific coefficient has been
determined from a wind tunnel calibration. If a specific coefficient from a wind tunnel calibration has been
obtained that coefficient will be used in lieu of 0.84. Standard pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria
required by U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.99. Any pitot tubes not
meeting the appropriate geometric criteria are discarded and replaced. Manometers are verified to be level
and zeroed prior to each test run and do not require further calibration.
e Temoerature Measurins Devices. All thermocouple sensors mounted in Dry Gas Meter Consoles are
calibrated semi-annually with a NlST-traceable thermocouple calibrator (temperature simulator) and
verified during field use using a second NlST-traceable meter. NlST-traceable thermocouple calibrators
are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory.
o Nozzles. Nozzles are measured three (3) times prior to initiating sampling with a caliper. The maximum
difference between any two (2) dimensions is 0.004 in.
o Digital Calipers. Calipers are calibrated annually by Alliance by using gage blocks that are calibrated
annually by an outside laboratory.
AST-2023-4659 Chevron - Salt Lake City, UT l0 of 22
FlaAI nge
r'; i: i"-) , ,-'llJ I
Site Spectfic Test Plan
Qunli6 Assurance P rogram
Barometer. The barometric pressure is obtained from a nationally recognized agency or a calibrated
barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field trip against a mercury barometer. The
barometer is acceptable if the values agree within + 2 percent absolute. Barometers not meeting this
requirement are adjusted or taken out ofservice.
Balances and Weiehts. Balances are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory. A functional check is
conducted on the balance each day it is use in the field using a calibration weight. Weights are re-certified
every fwo (2) years by an outside laboratory or intemally. If conducted internally, they are weighed on a
NIST traceable balance. If the weight does not meet the expected criteria, they are replaced.
Other Equipment. A mass flow controller calibration is conducted on each Environics system annually
following the procedures in the Manufacturer's Operation manual. A methane/ethane penetration factor
check is conducted on the total hydrocarbon analyzers equipped with non-methane cutters every six (6)
months following the procedures in 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ. Other equipment such as probes, umbilical
lines, cold boxes, etc. are routinely maintained and inspected to ensure that they are in good working order.
They are repaired or replaced as needed.
4.2 Field Sampling
Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test
method(s). General QC measures for the test program include:
r Cleaned glassware and sample train components will be sealed until assembly.
o Sample trains will be leak checked before and after each test run.
r Appropriate probe, filter and impinger temperatures will be maintained.
r The sampling port will be sealed to prevent air fiom leaking from the port.
. Dry gas meter, AP, AH, temperature and pump vacuum data will be recorded during each sample point.
o An isokinetic sampling rate of 90-l l0% will be maintained, as applicable.
. All raw data will be maintained in organized manner.
o All raw data will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability.
4.3 Analytical Laboratory
Analytical laboratory selection for sample analyses is based on the capabilities, certifications and accreditations that
the laboratory possesses. An approved analytical laboratory subcontractor list is maintained with a copy of the
certificate and analyte list as evidence of compliance. Alliance assumes responsibility to the client for the
subcontractor's work. Alliance maintains a verifiable copy of the results with chain of custody documentation.
AST-202346s9 Chevron - Salt Lake City, UT ll of22
12 of22
pultffiipe
"=:::,'O'GHOUP
Method I Data
SouM -
Prcjcct No. -
Dale:
Dmt Orientation:
Du"t D".igo,
-
DiltrM from Far Wall lo Oflside of Pon: _in
Nippk lngth: _in
Dcpih of DB: 0.00 in
Widrh of Dffi: - in
Crus3 Sstionrl Arer of Du"t,-]]-d
Equi\.|€nt DiM.n - in
No. ofT6t Ponsi _
Dtutuce A:
Dittue A Dmt DimteK:
DirtreB:
DirtrG B Dd DimtcB:
Minimm Numbcr of TrarcBe Points:
Actud NMher of Truv€ilc Poinls:
_fr
------::-(musl b. > o-s)
fi
(mu!t be>2)
Numbcr olReedinsr per Poifl:_
Mceurcr (IDiri.t ud D"t"),
-
R.ri€r.r (tritirl ud Drle)i
, Dttcr
Travers€
Point
Yo ol
Di'mter
Dirlee fmm
ofiride of$all
I
3
{
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Nunbet of ttrqse poirb on a dia&t
I
3
{
5
6
1
8
9
t0
ll
2 3 {6 1 8 9 to tl l2
25.0 t6.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.t 6.3 5.6 5.0 4.5 4.2
15.O -50.0 37 5 30.0 25.0 21.4 lE.8 t6.7 I5.0 13.6 t2.5
- 83.3 62.5 50.0 4t.1 35.7 31.3 27.a 25.0 31.8 20.8
87.5 70.0 58.3 50.0 43.8 38.9 35.0 22.7 29.2
" : '.' '.' 'i ii: ii,i :il ;ii ii.i
950 864 7.)2
_ 95.5 67 5
-. 958
*Percenl ot9rckAanetet.from inside ||all to tt^prle point
Slel Diagm
A= fi.
B= fl.
Depfi of Duct = 0 itr.
Cr6s SetioMl Arq
Downs*cam
Dirturbance
Upsftem
Oisturbance
13 of22
t\l0\i ? 4 ?-023
DIVISION OF AIR OiJALITY
14 of 22
purErre
TECI-]\1CAL GROI.-iP
Cyclonic Flow Check
Location -
Source --
Project No. --
Sample Point Angle (AP:0)
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1l
t2
l3
l4
l5
l6
t7
IE
19
20
2t
22
23
24
Averase
15 of22
pull6rpe
I{ (lrlN (_lAl (i'l(-.rli:,1
Location -
Method 3l3A Data
Source -
Project No. --
02 Data CO2 Data
Date/Time Date/Time
Make/ModeUSN
Parameter Cylinder ID Cylinder
Concentration. 7o
Analyzer
Concentration. 7o Cylinder ID Cylinder
Concentration. 7o
Analyzer
Concentration. 7"
Zero Gas
High Range Gas
Mid Range Gas
Concentration Span, 7o
Required Accuracy, 7o
Run No.Run I Run 2 Run 3
Analysis Date/Time
Parameter 02o/o co2oh O2o/o CO2Yo 02o/o CO2Vo
Analysis #l
Analysis #2
Analysis #3
Average
The rcmaining coh\istuenl is assumed to he nilrogen
16 of 22
Al6rcerE(',i\rcAL- {:RoUD
Method 4 Data
Location --
Source --
Project No. --
Parameter --
Analysis Gravimetric
Run I Date:
Impinger No I ,,3 4 Total
Contents H20 H20 Empty Silica
Initial Mass, g
Final Mass, g
Gain
Run 2 Date:
Impinger No.2 3 4 Total
Contents H20 H20 Empty Silica
Initial Mass, g
Final Mass, g
Gain
Run 3 Date:
Impinger No.I 2 3 4 Total
Contents H20 H20 Empty Silica
Initial Mass, g
Final Mass, g
Gain
17 of22
HAlhtrce
TgfiHl"J,CAL GBOt-,3 Isokinetic Field Data
LGatiotr: -Stert Time:Source: -o",",ffi Endrime: - Proj€cr
STACK DATA (EST}EOUIPMENT STACK DATA (ESTI FILTER NO.STACK DATA (FINALI MOIST. DATA
Moisturei _70 est.
Barometric: - in. Hg
S(atic Press: - in. WC
Stack Press: - in. Hg
CO2: - o/o
()2t - lo
Nr/CO: - %
Md: - lb/lb-mole
Ms: - lb/lb-mole
Met€r Box II): --
Y, T
aH 61in.wq,l-
Probe lD: -
Lin". Mnt"rid,l-
Pitot tD, ll-
Pitot cprtyp"r-f-
lro-r" ro,ll--f]-
Nozde Do (in.): -
Est. Tm:
Est. Ts: - 'F
Est. AP: - in. WC
Est. Dn: - in.
Trrget Rrle: - scfin
Pb: - in. Hg
Pg: - in. WC
Ozt - To
COr: - %
I n^-u p. r-;ri^r
Mc (ml)
K.FACTOR
,EAK CHECKI Pre Mid I Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid r (c0
Mid 2 (cf)
Mid 3 (cf)
Le.k Rrte (cfm):
Vacuum (in Hg):
Pilor Tube:,lid-Poitrt Le.k Check Vol (cf):
AL
Sample Time
(minules)
Dry Gas Meter
Reading
(ft')
Pitot
Tube
AP
(h wc)
Gas Temoeratures [oF)Orifice Press.
AH
(in. WC)
Pump
Vac
(in. Hg)
Gas TemDeralIres (oF)
% IS0 Vs
(fps)
DGM Averase S(ack Prohe Filter ImD Exit Aux
Begin End ldeal Actut
000 #DIV/O
#DMol lDtV/0
#DIV/O!4Dr!'/o
#Dtv/01 4DMO
#DMol gDMO
#DIV/OI #DIV/OI
#DMol fiDrv/o
#DMol #DMol
#DIV/OI #DIV/O
#DMol #DMol
#DIV/OI #DMO
#DMo!#DIV/OI
#rrIV/01 #DIV/O
#DIV/O!#DMo!
#DIV/OI t-Dtv/ol
#DIV/OI #Dtv/0
#Dry/01 #Dtv/0!
#DM0l #DIV/O
#DMol #DIV/OI
#Dtv/ol #DMol
#DMor #DIV/O
#Dry/o!#DMo!
#Dtv/01 #DIV/O
#DMol #DIV/O
Final DGM:
th
=af.l
Run Time Vm AP Tm rs V;: ^H %rso Bws Yo.
60.0 mrn 0.000 ftl in. WC - in. WC
18 of22
pua6rrEe
TECi]NICAL GROIi-JR
Locatiod -
QA/QC Data
Source -
Projet No. -
Prrameter -
Drte Nnzl. ID
Nozzle Diameter (in.)
#l #2 #3 Dtr (Averapel Difference Criteria Material
:< 0 004 in
Date Pitor ID Evidence of
damape?
Evidence of Calibration or
Dste Probe or Reference Indicated Difference Criteris Probe Lenglh
+ 1.5 % (absolute)
Field Balance Chek
I)rte
Balilce ID
Certified Weight ID
Certifi ed Weight Expiration
Certified weight (g)
Measued Werght (g)
Weight Difference (g)
Drte Barometric
Pressure
Dvidetrce oI
drflrse?Reading Verified LSlrDratron or
D Barometer ID
Date Meter Box ID Positive Prasurc Leak Cbek
Pss
Reagent Lot#Field Prep Field Lot I)sie By
Postl
Run I Rrn 2 Rnn 3
Flow Rate (lom)FIow Rate llnm)
Clock Trme Temmratrrre Clock Time Temner.h Clock Time T(
Method 5 Rinse Volume
Run I Run 2 Run 3
Acelone (ml)Acetone (mll (ml)
19 of22
pllr6rrrce
TECHNICAL GROTJP
Location: -
Source: --
Project No.: -
Run No.: I
Parameter: --
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg
AHPm = Pb*-
13.6
where,
Pb:_: barometric pressure, in. Hg
AH pressure differential oforifice, in HrO
PrT-=in ug
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg
Ps
Ps = Pb + '"
where, 73'6
Pb.-: barometric pressure, in. Hg
Pg - : static pressure, in. HrO
Ps - :in.Hg
Standard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf
77.636xYxVmxPm
Vmstd =
where.
Y.-: meter correclion factor
V*__1!![=melervolume, cf
Pm absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
Tm
---
= absolute meter temperature, T.
VmstdT=6t.1
Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf
Vwstd:0.047!6 x Vlc
where,
Vlc -- = weight of HrO collected, g
v*.tdT:scf
Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimensionless (theoretical at saturated conditions)
\o6s?-(ffiBWSsat : ----
where,
Tr.-= stack temperature, oF
Pr.-: absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
BWSsat -- = dimensionless
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless (measured)
VwstdDtlra" (Vwstd + Vmstd)
where.
Vwstd .- = slandard wet volume, scf
v.rtal: standard meter volume, dscf
BWS - : dimensionless
Tm
20 of22
l.lltErlrce
TECHNICAL GHOUP
Location: -
Source: -
Project No.: -
Run No.: I
Parameter: -
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat < BWSmsd
where,
BWSsat - : moisture fraction (theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd - : moisture fiaction (measured)
BWS .-
Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lb/lb-mole
Md : (0.4a x o/oCO) + (0.32 x o/oO2) + (0.28(100- o/oCO2 - o/oO2))
where,
CO, .: : carbon dioxide concentration, 0/o
02 - : oxygen concentration, To
Md::lb/rbmol
Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/lb-mole
Ms:
where,
Md (1 - BWS) + 18.01s (BWS)
Md -- : molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
BWS .3: moisture fraction, dimensionless
Ms lb/lb mol
-_:
average stack gas flow at stack conditions, acfm
.3: moisture fraction, dimensionless
.g: absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
.g: absolute stack temperature, oR
Average Velocity (Vs), ftlsec
Vs = 95.49 x Cp x (LVttzlavg x
where,
Cp..g: pitot tube coelficient
LPt/2 -- = velocity head ofstack gas, (in. H2O)r/2
Tr.3: absolute stack temperature,'R
Pr.;: absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Mr.3: molecularweight of stack gas, lb/lb mol
Vs - = ft/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm
Qa=60xVsxAs
where,
Vs -- : stack gas velocity, ft/sec
As = cross-sectional area ofstack. ff
Qa - : acfin
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm
Ps
Qs = 17.636 x Qa x (1 - BWS) X ;'l's
where,
Qa
BWS
Ps
Ts
Qs = dscfm
2l of22
A.AreTECHNICAL GROUP
Location: -
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Source: -
Project No.: -
Run No.: I
Parameter: -
0.0319xTmx29
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check (Yqa), dimensionless
Y_
Yqa =
where,
x 100
: meter conection factor, dimensionless
= run time, min.
= total meter volume, dcf: absolute meter temperature, oR
: orifice meter calibration coefficient, in. HrO
= barometric pressure, in. Hg
= average pressure differential oforifice, in I{2O
= molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
= average squareroot pressure differential oforifice, (in. H2O)l/2
= percent
offi
60
**.)
TstVn = F; (0.002669 x Vlc *
where,
(AH)"':
Yqu--
Volume of Nozle (Vn), ft3
Ts
Ps
Mc
Vm
Pm
Y
Tm
Vn
Isokinetic Sampling Rste (I), %
Y
@
Vm
Tm
LH@
Pb
AH avg
Md
rVnt
-
l_' \Ax60xAnxl,'|s
Vm x PmxYt
-l
Tm)
= absolute stack temperature, oR
= absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
: volume of H2O collected, ml
: meter volume. cf
= absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
: meter conection factor, unitless
= absolute meter temperature, k
: volume ofnozzle. ftl
1x100I
= nozzle volume, ft3
= run time, minutes
= ueaofnozzle,fr2: average velocity, fl/sec
where,
Vn
e
An
Vs
I
60.0 UTAH DEPARTIVIENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUTY
NOV 2 t+ ?i'::3
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
_ =o/o
22 of22