HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRC-2011-007388 - 0901a06880270f9fState of Utah
GARY R. HERBERT
Governor
GREG BELL
Lieutenant Governor
Department of
Environmental Quality
Amanda Smith
Executive Director
DIVISION OF RADIATION CONTROL
Rusty Lundberg
Director
September 14, 2011
CERTIFIED MAIL
(Return Receipt Requested)
Jo Ann Tischler, Director, Compliance and Permitting
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
1050 17"^ Street
Suite 950 '
Denver, CO 80265
Dear Ms. Tischler:
Subject: .. Settlement Agreement, Docket No. UGW11-02SA, Denison Mines (USA) Corp, (DUSA)
White Mesa Uranium Mill, Blanding, UT, Utah Ground Water Discharge Permit No.
UGW370004
Enclosed is a copy of the duly executed Settlement Agreement (SA), Docket No. UGW11-02SA. The SA
is dated and effective as of September 14, 2011. Please ensure that the required payment is submitted to
the Utah Division of Radiation Control within 30 calendar days of the effective date (by October 14, 2011)
as required by item 5.a. of the SA.
Please contact Tom Rushing at (801) 536-0080 if you have any questions conceming this matter.
Sincerely,
Utah Water Quality Board
Rusty Lundberg
Co-Executive Secretary
RL:TR:tr
Enclosure: Copy of Executed SA
cc: Denise Chancellor, Assistant Attomey General (w/encl.)
Rob Herbert, DWQ (Letter Only)
F:\DUSA\UGW11-02\Final SA Docs\Final SA Transmittal Ltr.doc
195 North 1950 West • Salt L.ake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144850 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4850
Telephone (801) 536-4250 • Fax (801) 533-4097 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4414
www.deq.Utah, yor
Printed on 100% recycled paper
Denison Mines. (USA) Corp.
White Mesa Mill
Settlement Agreement, Docket No. UGW 11-025A
UTAH WATER QUALITY BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF
DENISON MINUS (USA) CORP.
1050 17™ STREET, SUITE 950
DENVER, CO 80265
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
DOCKET NUMBER UGWil-02SA
This SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (hereinafter "AGREEMENT") is between DENISON
MINES (USA) CORP. (hereinafter "OPERATOR") and the UTAH WATER QUALITY
BOARD (hereinafter the "BOARD"), concerning violations oflhe Utah Waler Qualily Act (the
Act), Utah Code Annotated ("UCA ") §§19-5-101 to -124, and the Utah Administrative Code
("UAC")R3J7-1 to-560.
1. The BOARD has authority to administer the Utah Water Quahty Act, and the Utah
Administrative Code. UCA §§19-5-106,-115.
I • ....
2. The CO-EXECUTIVE SECRETARY of the BOARD (hereinafter the
"CO-EXECUTIVE SECRETARY") will administer the terms and provisions of this
AGREEMENT. UCA §§19-5-106 and 115.
3. This AGREEMENT resolves violations 1 and 3 cited in the NOTICE OF VIOLATION
and ORDER, Docket Number UGWll-02 (hereinafter the ''NOTICE") issued to the
OPERATOR on May 9, 2011, by the BOARD. It does not in any way relieve the
OPERATOR from any other obligation imposed under the Act or any other State or
Federal laws.
4. The parties nov/ desire to resolve this matter fully without further administrative
proceedings except to the extent provided herein by entering into this AGREEMENT.
Entering into this AGREEMENT is not an admission of liability or factual allegation set
out in the NOTICE, nor is it an admission of or an agreement to any disputed facts or
disputed legal theories, nor is it an admission of any violation of any law, rule, regulation or
pennit by the OPERATOR.
5. In resolution of the NOTICE referenced herein in paragraph 3, the OPERATOR agrees to
the settlement terms stated in paragraphs a. and b. below:
a. In resolution of violations of the NOTICE referenced in Paragraph 3 of this
AGREEMENT, the OPERATOR agrees to pay a total penalty amount of
$2,290.00 within 30 calendar days ofthe effective date of this AGREEMENT by
check. The check wil] be made payable to the State of Utah, delivered or mailed to
August 29, 2010 Docket No. UGWJ1-02SA Page i
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
White Mesa Mill
Seulement Agreement, Docket No. UGWl 1-02SA
the Division of Radiation Control, Department of Environmental Quality, 195 North
1950 West, P.O. Box 144850, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4850. The penalty has
been determined using the Penalty Criteria far Civil Settlement Negotiations, Utah
Administrative Code ("UAC") R317-1-8 which considers such factors as the nature,
severity and extent of the violations, history of noncompliance, degree of willfulness
and/or negligence, good faith efforts to comply, and economic benefit.
b. The CO-EXECUTIVE SECRETARY recognizes that per the NOTICE Part E.2.
the OPERATOR was required to submit a report with revised statistics for Field pH
to be used for the development of revised Ground Water Compliance Limits. The
CO-EXECUTIVE SECRETARY received a request to extend the submittal date
via e-mail on June 30,2011. This request also included a summary oflhe suspected
root cause of pH exceedences, a discussion of actions taken, as well as
recommended future actions. Based on the OPERATOR'S request, as well as
additional discussion between the CO-EXECUTIVE SECRETARY and the
OPERATOR, additional coordination needs to be conducted to proceed with the
study. The CO-EXECUTIVE SECRETARY therefore considers the receipt ofthe
June 30, 2011 OPERATOR request as having met the conditions ofthe NOTICE
Part E.2., and recognizes that addilional con-espondence will be conducted outside
of the NOTICE requirements.
c. The CO-EXECUTIVE SECRETARY recognizes that all other required document
submission items of the NOTICE Part E, other than the Field pH Report listed in
item 6.b. above, were received on or before their respective due date.
6. The deadline stipulated in item 6.a. above may be amended by prior written mutual
agreement of the panies. The party requesting the amendment must write to the other party
14 calendar days before the documented deadline and request an amendment of the
deadline. The other party will either agree to or deny thc amendment in writing within 10
calendar days of receipt of the request.
7. Nothing contained in this AGREEMENT shall preclude the BOARD from taldng additional
actions to include additional penalties against the OPERATOR for pennit violations not
resolved by this AGREEMENT.
8. If an agreement bet^veen the OPERATOR and the EXECUTIVE SECRETARY cannot be
reached in a dispute arising under any provision of this AGREEMENT, then the
OPERATOR or the CO-EXECUTIVE SECRETARY may commence a proceeding with the
BOARD underthe Utah Administrative Procedures Ac t, Utah Code Annotated §§63G-4-10J
to -601 to resolve the dispute. A final decision in any adjudicative proceeding shall be subject
to judicial review under applicable state law.
Auoust 29, 20JO Docket No. UGWl 1-02SA Page 2
Deni.son Mine.s (USA) Corp.
While Mesa Mill
Settlement .Asreeinent. Docket No. UGWl 1-02SA
9. Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall constitute a waiver by the OPERATOR to raise in
defense any legal or factual contention for future allegations of noncompliance.
10. Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall constitute or be considered as a release from any claims,
to include natural resource damage chums, cause of action, or demand in law or equity which
the STATE may have against the OPERATOR, or any other person, firm, partnership or
corporation for any liability arising out of or relating in any way lo the release of pollutants to
waters of the Stale.
AGREED to this pt^day of'^J|p^OAjgX(/' . 2011.
UTAH WATER QUALTTY BOARD DENISON,MINES (USA) CORP
VIpkm FryJjenlund
D&A Vice President and Counsel
Rusty Lurwlberg
Co-Exccuiive Secrelarv
Auijusi 29, 2010 Docket No. UGWl I-02SA
JD
ru
r-=1
LO
ir
n-
• o a
a
r=l
r={
a
I-q
•
U.S. Postal Service TM
CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT
(Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provide
For dellvery information visjt our website at www.usps.com@
. USE
Postage $
Certified Fee
RE:8/14/11; settlement agreement/ TR
Jo Ann Tischler
Denison Mines (USA) Corp
1050 Seventeenth ST, STE 950
Denver, Co 80265
P.S Form 3800. August 2006 See Reverse-fof Instructions.;