DRC-2010-002858 - 0901a06880361a50

RC- 20 10-00 2 i.)
Q
DENISO
MINES
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
1050 17th Street, Suite 950
Denver, CO 80265
USA
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.denisonmines.com
April 30, 2010
VIA PDF AND FEDERAL EXPRESS
Dane L. Finerfrock
Executive Secretary
Utah Division of radiation Control
168 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144810
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4810
Dear Mr. Finerfrock:
Re: Addendum to Semi-Annual Effluent Monitoring Report July 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2009, DRC Inspection Module EM-01, RML UT1900479
Reference is made to Denison Mines (USA) Corp.'s ("DUSA's") Semi Annual Effluent
Monitoring Report for the period fi-om July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 (the "SAER")
and to the letter of April 7, 2010 fi-om the Executive Secretary, Utah Division of Radiation
Control (the "DRC letter"), describing the results of the DRC's inspection of that Report.
The SAER provided the analytical results of stack sampling conducted for the 3rd and 4th
Quarters of 2009, as well as for the 1st and 2nd Quarters of 2009, indicating the concentration in
the stack emissions (in uCi/cc) and the stack's radionuclide release rate (in uCi/sec) for U-Nat,
Th-230, Ra-226 and Pb-210 at each of the stacks sampled. The actual analytical results reported
by the laboratory were provided in Attachment G of the SAER.
As explained in the SAER, due to inadvertence on the part of the Mill's sampling contractor, the
Mill's contract analytical laboratory was not instructed to analyze for Th-230, Ra-226 or Pb-210
for the fourth quarter 2009 sampling event for the yellowcake dryer and the yellowcake
baghouse. However, the laboratory was instructed on February 25, 2010 to analyze for those
constituents from 4th quarter 2009 samples remaining at the laboratory. Although these fourth
quarter results were not included in the SAER, they were subsequently analyzed from samples
collected during the required monitoring period.
The DRC letter requests that Denison submit an addendum to the SAER, including the results of
the 3'^'' quarter samples, by April 30, 2010. This letter transmits the Addendum requested in the
DRC letter, and additional documentation explaining the required frequency of sampling and
analysis for stack emissions, as described below.
The DRC letter questions why Lead-210, Radium-226 and Thorium-230 were not also sampled
in the third quarter of 2009, and cites Appendix E, Section 1.4, Source Emissions, Sub-section
5.1, Yellow Cake Stacks of the Mill's 1991 License Renewal Application (the "Application"). A
copy of this sub-section has been attached to this transmittal letter. The DRC letter cites only a
portion of the text of that sub-section, as follows:
" ... the Mill failed to meet the requirements of the Mill's 1991 License Renewal
Application, Appendix E, Section 1.4, Source Emissions, Sub-section 5.1, Yellow Cake
Stacks, which states: "The exhaust stack for the drying and packaging equipment
associated with the yellow cake calciner is sampled on a quarterly basis during operation
. . .Samples are analyzed for: Natural Uranium, Lead-210, Radium-226 and Thorium-
230 on a quarterly basis.'"'
The portions of the sub-section omitted fi-om the Division's quotation actually specify the
frequency of the required analysis. The sub-section specifies:
"Samples are analyzed for: natural uranium, Lead-210, Radium-226, and Thorium-230
on a semi-annual basis and for Natural Uranium on 'a quarterly basis." [Emphasis
added].
Section 5.0 of Tab 1.4 of the Mill's Environmental Protection Manual, Revision: DUSA-1, 2/07
(the Environmental Protection manual"), as cited in the SAER and provided as an attachment to
this letter, is consistent with the analytical frequency specified in the 1991 Application.
Specifically, stack sampling in the 3'^'* quarter required analysis for uranium only. The
appropriate uranium analysis data was provided in the SAER submitted on April 1, 2010.
If you have any questions or require any further information, please contact the undersigned.
DENISO
MINES
Yours truly,
Jo Ann S. Tischler
Director, Compliance and Permitting
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Ron F. Hochstein
Ryan Palmer
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
DENiSOi
MINES
WHITE MESA MILL
1991 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION
APPENDIX E, SECTION 1.4, SOURCE EMISSIONS
SUB-SECTION 5.1, YELLOW CAKE STACKS
Sect Li
Revison: Zero
Date: 1/85
5.0 MONITORING LOCATION AND FREQUENCY
During non-operational periods, monitoring is not done.
5.1 Yellow Cake Stacks
The exhaust stack for the drying and packaging equipment associated
with the yellow cake calciner is sampled on a quarterly basis during
operations. The sample ports are located on the roof of the main
mill building.
Samples are analyzed for: Natural Uranium, Lead-210, Radium-226,
and Thorium-230 on a semi-annual basis and for Natural Uranium on a
quarterly basis.
5.2 Crusher Stacks
The crusher stacks are located at:
1. Ore Buying Station (3) and,
2. Ore Hopper Feed (1)
These stacks are accessible from stack platforms and are sampled on
a semi-annual basis during operations. Samples are analyzed for:
Natural Uranium, Lead-210, Radium-226, and Thorium-230.
6,0 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
The lab analytical procedures utilized are as presented in the
Representative Analytical Laboratory Procedure Manual.
Field sample handling consists of sampled air volume moisture
determination, sampled gas volume, percent isoKinetic, stack air emission
rate, particulate weight sampled, particulate emission rates
determinations, measuring collected condensate volumes, rinsing glassware,
and collection of condensate and rinse solutions for analysis.
All glassware is pre-rinsed with O.IN nitric acid, and all solutions used
in impinger traps contain O.IN nitric acid.
After sampling, the glassware and stainless steel units are rinsed with
0.1 nitric acid, with the rinse added to the condensate solutions. The
glassware is then rinsed with isopropyl alcohol and stored.
Samples submitted for analysis for each run are:
1. Glassfiber filters, net gain weight determined at White Mesa;
2. Condensate and rinse solutions (volumes of each determined at
White Mesa);
-27-
WHITE MESA MILL
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MANUAL
SECTION 1.4
White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Date: 2/07 Revision: DUSA-2
Book #11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 1.4 Page 1 of 6
STACK EMISSION MONITORING PROCEDURES
WHITE MESA GAS STACK EMISSIONS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
White Mesa uses scientifically approved reference methods to detennine gas stack
emissions release concentration for radionuclide particulates. These methods
conform to principles that apply to obtaining valid samples of airborne radioactive
materials, using prescribed acceptable methods and materials for gas and
particulate sampling. See American Standard Guide to Sampling Airborne
Radioactive Materials in Nuclear Facilities ANSI N13.1-1969. These sampling
methods are also consistent with guidance contained in the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission's Regulatory Guide 4.14, "Radiological Effluent and
Environmental Monitoring at Uranium Mills."
2.0 SAMPLING METHODOLOGIES
The sampling methods for airborne radionuclide particulates, from the yellowcake
dryer and other mill effluent control stacks, are identical to methods published in
the EPA's manual. Gas Stream Sampling Reference Methods for New Source
Performance Standards: they are found in the EPA Manual in Appendix No. 5,
"Detennination of Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources" ("EPA Method
#5") and Appendix No. 17, "Determination of Particulate Emissions from
Stationary Sources (In-Stack Filtration Method)" ("EPA Method #17). Copies of
EPA Method #5 and #17 are attached to this SOP. Sampling is performed as per
the methods, to ensure that the sampling and results are: (1) isokinetic; (2)
representative; and (3) adequate for determination of the release rates and
concentrations of U-Nat, Th-230, Ra-226 and Pb-210.
2.1 Sampling Equipment
Sampling equipment used to collect airborne radionuclide particulates from point
source emission stacks at the Mill consists of equipment manufactured by
Research Appliance Company (RAC), (or other equivalent apparatuses), as
follows:
1. RAC Model 201009 Model 2414 stack sampler.
2. Two each, RAC Model 201044 modular sample cases. One heater box and
one glassware box.
3. One each, RAC Model 201019 umbilical cord.
White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Date: 2/07 Revision: DUSA-2
Book #11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 1.4 Page 2 of 6
4. Three each, RAC Model 201013 - 100mm diameter filter holders.
5. One each, RAC Model 201005 standard pilot tube, three feet length,
stainless steel/S-type probe.
6. Barometer.
7. Psychrometer.
8. Satorius Model 2432 balance or equivalent.
9. Triple beam balance.
Equipment instruction and operating manual(s) provided by the manufacturer(s)
are retained at the Mill and used for specific guidance and reference.
2.2 Sample Collection
Gas stack samples are collected from emission control systems used in Uranium
Recovery Operations at the Mill. These samples are collected from process stacks
when the emission control systems are operating. They are sampled for
radionuclide particulate concentrations at a frequency in accordance with Table 5-
1. Sample collection methods are described in detail in EPA Method #5 and EPA
Method #17, Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions From Stationary
Sources. It is necessary to read and understand all procedures described in the
methods and in the equipment manual. The operation of the equipment requires
"hands-on" instruction from the Radiation Departmental Staff from individuals
who are experienced in using sample collection equipment and applying sample
collection methods. The following steps are described for stack sample
collection.
1. Check equipment listed in Section 2.1 of this SOP. Consult the
manufacturers equipment operations manual for details.
2. Assemble equipment as described in the operations manual for sample
collection EPA Method #17.
3. Follow the calibration procedure listed in fhe manual. If the
calibration measurements are not obtained, consult the trouble
shooting section of the manual for corrective instruction. Once the
collection apparatus is calibrated, proceed to the next step.
4. Weigh a new glass fiber filter, record the weight, and place in the
filter holder assembly.
5. Check the sample collection system for leaks.
6. Cap ends of sample probes to prevent contamination and transport
sample unit to the sample location.
7. Uncap sample end and insert 3/8-diameter sample probe into the stack
in the midsection of the exhaust stream.
8. Tum sample apparatus on and observe unit operation to insure a
sample is being collected and the apparatus is functioning properly.
While Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Date: 2/07 Revision: DUSA-2
Book #11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 1.4 Page 3 of 6
9. Collect the stack sample for at least one hour during periods of routine
process operation. Note the collection time.
10. Record the information described in the manufacture's operations
manual. This information is also described in the EPA Methods #5
and #17 for point source particulate emissions.
11. After sample collection is complete, tum off unit. Obtain sample
filter from filter housing and place in a new plastic petri dish. Send to
outside laboratory for radionuclide analysis in accordance with Table
5-1.
2.3 Sample Handling and Shipping
1. During preparation and assembly on the sampling train, keep all
openings where contamination can occur covered until just prior lo
assembly or until sarapling is about to begin.
2. Using a tweezer or clean disposable surgical gloves, place a labeled
(identified) and weighed filter in the filter holder. Be sure that the
filter is properly centered and the gasket properly placed so as to
prevent the sample gas stream from circumventing the filter. Check
the filter for tears after assembly is completed.
3. Before moving the sampling train to the cleanup site, remove the
probe from the sample train, wipe off the silicone grease, and cap the
open outlet of the probe. Be careful not to lose any condensate that
might be present. Wipe off the silicone grease from the filter inlet
where the probe was fastened, and cap it. Remove the umbilical cord
from the last impinger, and cap the impinger. If a flexible line is used
between the first impinger or condenser and the filter holder,
disconnect the line at the filter holder, and let any condensed water or
liquid drain into the impingers or condenser. After wiping off the
silicone grease, cap off the filter holder outlet and impinger inlet.
Either ground-glass stoppers, plastic caps, or semm caps may be used
to close these openings.
4. Transfer the probe and filter-impinger assembly to the cleanup area.
This area should be clean and protected from the wind so that the
chances of contaminating or losing the sample will be minimized.
5. Save a portion of the acetone used for cleanup as a blank. Take 200
ml of this acetone directly from the wash bottle being used, and place
it in a glass sample container labeled "acetone blank."
6. Carefully remove the filter from the filter holder, and place it in its
identified petri dish container. Use a pair of tweezers and/or clean
disposable surgical gloves to handle the filler. If it is necessary lo fold
the filter, do so such that the PM cake is inside the fold. Using a dry
Nylon bristle brush and/or a sharp-edged blade, carefully transfer to
White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Date: 2/07 Revision: DUSA-2
Book #11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 1.4 Page 4 of 6
the petri dish and PM and/or filter fibers that adhere to the filter
holder gasket. Seal the container.
7. Send to the laboratory for radionuclide analysis.
3.0 RECORD KEEPING
Records of gas stack effluent sampling events and results of analysis are retained
at the Mill. The following information is recorded:
1. Stack and Run ID
2. Date and Sampler
3. Sampled Air Volume at standard conditions
4. Sampled Water Volume at standard conditions
5. Moisture Content (volume basis)
6. Stack Gas Molecular Weight (wet basis)
7. Slack Gas Velocity
8. Slack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (dry basis, at standard conditions)
9. Particulate Concentration
10. Percent Isokinetics
11. Emission Rales for Particulates U-Nat, Th-230, Ra-226, and Pb-210.
The data are used lo calculate emission rales in pounds and pico curies per hour
for radionuclide particulate concentrations.
4.0 MONITORING LOCATION AND FREQUENCY
Slack sampling must be performed during any quarter or semi-annual period that
the stacks operate in accordance with the schedule in Table 5-1. During non-
operational periods, stack sampling is not performed.
4.1 YELLOWCAKE STACKS
The exhaust stack for the drying and packaging equipment associated with the
yellowcake calciner is sampled on a quarterly basis during operations. The
sample ports are locaied on the roof of the main Mill building.
4.2 Feed Stacks
The grizzly feed stack is located on the north end of the grizzly structure. This
slack is accessible from a stack platform and is sampled on a semi-annual basis if
this system is operating.
White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Date: 2/07 Revision: DUSA-2
Book #11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 1.4 Page 5 of 6
5.0 ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
All gas stack samples are collected at the Mill according to the calendar year
schedule shown below in Table 5-1. The samples will be sent to an off-site
laboratory for the analysis detailed below.
TABLE 5-1
Sampling Frequency and Analysis
Feed Stack Stack for Y.C. Dryer and Packaging
Quarterly: None Quarterly: If operating, U-nat
Semi-Annual: If operating, U-nat, Th-230 Semi-Annual: If operating, U-nat-
Th-230, Ra-226,
Pb-210
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHODOLOGY
6.1 Equipment Operation
Prior to performing an emission poinl sampling mn, the sampling equipment is
subjected to a dry run test lo detennine leakages or equipment malfunction.
Calibration of equipment is checked on a periodic basis. Probe tips are protected
by a protective cap while not in use lo protect accuracy determinations. During
transport of equipment, all openings are sealed to prevent contamination.
Calculations utilized during runs to maintain isokinetic conditions are reviewed
and dry mn tested prior to the aclual run. All containers and probes are washed
prior to each usage.
Malfunction of sampling equipmeni, excessive malfunctions of normal operations
being monitored, or percent isokinetic sampling rates greater than ± 10% error,
indicate mandatory voiding of the run or data involved.
6.2 Operations
If samples are collected from the operation of any unit which appears, in the
judgment of the sampler, lo be functioning in a manner not consistent with normal
operations, then the sample will be voided and the system will be resampled.
6.3 Chemical Sample Control
Analyses on each period's sample shall include blanks for the filters, impinger
solutions, and the rinse solutions. A field logbook shall be maintained listing data
White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Date: 2/07 Revision: DUSA-2
Book #11: Environmental Protection Manual, Section 1.4 Page 6 of 6
generated, determinations of volumes measured, and net gain weights of filters to
provide a back up to summary data records. Filters are transmitted within plastic
enclosed petri dishes. Handling of filters is only done using tweezers.
6.4 Calculations
All calculations will be retained at the Mill in both a hard copy and computer
files.
The gas stack effluent concentrations (C) are calculated as follows:
Lab Result |iCi (A) / Volume Sampled (V) = Effluent ConcenU-ation (C)
where
Volume Sampled (V) = Flow rate (Q) * Time of sample collection in minutes (t)
and
Lab Result \iCi (A) = Radioisotopic activity, in |lCi on air filter
The DRC letter requests that Denison submit an addendum to the SAER, including the results of
the 3'^'' quarter samples, by April 30, 2010. This letter transmits the Addendum requested in the
DRC letter, and additional documentation explaining the required firequency of sampling and
analysis for stack emissions, as described below.
The DRC letter questions why Lead-210, Radium-226 and Thorium-230 were not also sampled
in the third quarter of 2009, and cites Appendix E, Section 1.4, Source Emissions, Sub-section
5.1, Yellow Cake Stacks of the Mill's 1991 License Renewal Application (the "Application"). A
copy of this sub-section has been attached to this transmittal letter. The DRC letter cites only a
portion ofthe text of that sub-section, as follows:
... the Mill failed to meet the requirements of the Mill's 1991 License Renewal
Application, Appendix E, Section 1.4, Source Emissions, Sub-section 5.1, Yellow Cake
Stacks, which states: "The exhaust stack for the drying and packaging equipment
associated with the yellow cake calciner is sampled on a quarterly basis during operation
. . .Samples are analyzed for: Natural Uranium, Lead-210, Radium-226 and Thorium-
230 on a quarterly basis.""
The portions of the sub-section omitted from the Division's quotation actually specify the
frequency ofthe required analysis. The sub-section specifies:
"Samples are analyzed for: natural uranium, Lead-210, Radium-226, and Thorium-230
on a semi-annual basis and for Natural Uranium on a quarterly basis." [Emphasis
added].
Section 5.0 of Tab 1.4 of the Mill's Environmental Protection Manual, Revision: DUSA-1, 2/07
(the Environmental Protection manual"), as cited in the SAER and provided as an attachment to
this letter, is consistent with the analytical frequency specified in the 1991 Application.
Specifically, stack sampling in the 3'^'* quarter required analysis for uranium only. The
appropriate uranium analysis data was provided in the SAER submitted on April 1, 2010.
If you have any quesfions or require any fiirther information, please contact the undersigned.
DENISO
MINES
Addendum to
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Radioactive Materials License UT900479
Semi-Annual Effluent Monitoring Report
(July through December, 2009)
Prepared For:
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Radiation Control
Prepared by Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
1050 1 ih Street, Suite 950
Denver, CO 80265
April 30, 2010
ADDENDUM
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
SEMI-ANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT, JULY THROUGH DECEMBER, 2009
1. INTRODUCTION
The White Mesa Mill (the "Mill") has established monitoring programs to evaluate
compliance with effluent limitations and to assess the potential for release of radioactive
material into the local environment. These monitoring programs were developed and
implemented at the time of Mill construction, operated with appropriate adaptation over
time, and are consistent with the Mill's State of Utah Radioactive Materials License No.
UTI900479 (the "License") and guidelines developed by the United States Nuclear
Regulatory Commission ("NRC") (NRC Regulatory Guide 4.14, Radiological Effluent
and Environmental Monitoring at Uranium Mills-Rev. I, ML003739941), 1980).
The Mill's semi-annual effluent reports provide the results of the specific monitoring and
sampling activities that were undertaken during the subject reporting period.
This document is an addendum to the semi-annual effluent report for the period July
through December, 2009 (the "SAER") which was submitted to Utah Department of
Environmental Quality Division of Radiation Control on February 26, 20 I O.
As explained in the SAER, due to inadvertence on the part of the Mill's sampling
contractor, the Mill's contract analytical laboratory was not instructed to analyze for Th-
230, Ra-226 or Pb-210 for the fourth quarter 2009 sampling event for the yellowcake
dryer and the yellowcake baghouse. However, the laboratory was instructed on February
25, 2010 to analyze for those constituents from 4th quarter 2009 samples remaining at the
laboratory. Although these fourth quarter results were not included in the SAER, they
were subsequently analyzed from samples collected during the required monitoring
period. The purpose of this addendum is to amend the SAER to include the inadvertently
omitted data, and certain explanatory disclosures.
2, DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES AND ADDITIONS
a. The following paragraph should be deemed to be included in Section 5 at the end
of the last full paragraph on Page 8 of the SAER.
"Subsequent to submission of this SAER, remaining samples collected
during the fourth quarter 2009 sampling event for the yellowcake dryer and
the yellowcake baghouse were analyzed for Th-230, Ra-226 and Pb-21 O.
The required fourth quarter Stack Effluent Concentrations and Release Rates
for these three analytes are provided in the updated Table 8, below. As
indicated in Table 7, semi-annual monitoring, which is conducted in the first
and third quarters, requires only analysis and tabulation of these parameters
for uranium. As identified in the updated Table 8, data for these parameters
for Th-230, Ra-226 or Pb-2IO for the third quarter of 2009 is not required
and has not been included in Table 8."
b. Table 8, provided below, should be deemed to replace the version of Table 8 in
the SAER.
Table 8-Stack Effluent Concentrations and Release Rates
V-Nat V-Nat. Th-230 Th-230 Ra-226 Ra-226 Pb-210
u/Ci/cc uCilsec uCi/cc uCi/sec uCi/cc uCiisec uCi/cc
1ST Otr, 2009 .... I ...•......•.. '., .' ..... '. ! .. . ' ....... ...... ..... < . .... ." .
." . .
North YC Dryer, Run
I 1.94E-09 8.33E-04 1.14E-12 4.9IE-07 5.12E-14 2.20E-08 l.l2E-12
North YC Dryer, Run
2 1.60E-09 6.5 I E-04 7.60E-13 3.IOE-07 3.45E-14 1.41 E-08 1.05E-12
. 2"d Otr, 2009
".
I·.···.·.· •• '.' .... . ' ...... '.' ' .............. I ......•..... L •
1 . '. . '. .. ' .... .'.
North YC Dryer, Run
I 4.49E-IO 2.31 E-04 3.70E-13 1.90E-07 3.6IE-14 1.86E-08 5.60E-13
North YC Dryer, Run
2 9.26E-IO 6.07E-04 3.59E-13 2.36E-07 2.60E-14 UIE-08 8.68E-13
Yellowcake Baghouse 5.81 E-I 0 6.07E-04 4.IOE-12 4.59E-06 2.88E-14 3.22E-08 2.86E-13
Grizzly Baghouse 1.28E-II 6.50E-04 2.32E-13 2.36E-07 1.81E-13 8.12E-08 3.46E-13
3'" Otr,20()9 . .' '.' .... ..
• •••• I '. .... ..... .•... ...... ............... ......
North YC Dryer, Run Not Not Not Not Not
I 7.0510-09 3.60E-03 Required Required Required Required Required
North YC Dryer, Run Not Not Not Not Not
2 I.72E-08 7.9010-03 Required Required Re.'luired Required Required
Not Not Not Not Not
Yellowcake Baghouse 3.24E-09 3.4410-03 Required Required Required Required Required
•. . " 4'hQtr,2009 • '., . '. . . ' ' .• ...............• .. ' .....
' ..... .' ' .
--'-
North YC Dryer, Run
I 7.31 E-09 3.5910-03 3.24E-II 1.59E-05 2.0910-12 1.0210-06 2.38E-13
North YC Dryer, Run
2 9.94E-09 4.97E-03 1.3410-11 6.7IE-06 2.17E-12 1.08E-06 1.9810-13
Yellowcake Baghouse 3.7410-09 4.6IE-03 2.0IE-11 2.48E-05 1.34E-12 1.65E-06 4.22E-13
c. The original Tetco report, submitted with the SAER, contains the stack
monitoring data and analytical results for natural uranium. TETCO's revised
report entitled, Fourth Quarter Radionuclide Emissions Test Conducted at
Denison Mines Corporation North Yellow Cake Scrubber Yellow Cake Baghouse,
2
Pb-210
uCi/sec
. .............
4.8IE-07
4.29E-07
.......
2.88E-07
5.69E-07
3.20E-07
1.55E-07
' .........
Not
Required
Not
Required
Not
Required
.' .,
1.17E-07
9.92E-08
5.20E-07
includes the required stack monitoring data and analytical results for Lead-21 0,
Radium-226 and Thorium-230. The attached copy of the revised Tetco report
should be deemed to be included under Tab G of the SAER, along with the
original Tetco report.
3. VERIFICATION
Except as set out above by this addendum, the content of the SAER, as submitted on
February 26,2010, remains unchanged.
4. SIGNATURE
This Addendum was prepared by Denison Mines (USA) Corp. on April 30, 2010.
Denison Mines (USA) Corp. BYjj
David C. Frydenlund
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Counsel
3
SUPPLEMENTAL TETCO REPORT
INCLUDED UNDER
TAB G OFSAER
4
SUPPLEMENTAL TETCO REPORT
INCLUDED UNDER
TAB GOFSAER
4
Prepared for:
FOURTH QUARTER
RADIONUCLIDE EMISSIONS TEST
CONDUCTED AT
DENISON MINES CORPORATION
NORTH YELLOW CAKE SCRUBBER
YELLOW CAKE DRYER BAGHOUSE
BLANDING, UTAH
December 15-16,2009
by:
TETCO
391 East 620 South
American Fork, UT 84003
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone] fax
Denison Mines Corporation
6425 S Hwy 91
Blanding, Utah 84511
Date of Report:
April 19,2010
CERTIFICATION OF REPORT INTEGRITY
Technical Emissions Testing Company (TETCO) cel1ifies that this report represents the truth as
well as can be derived by the methods employed. Every effort was made to obtain accurate and
representative data and to comply with procedures set forth in the Federal Register.
ili1j d AL 1. Mike McNamara
Reviewer: _____ It'-'-K\"-I. __ ~L_-_I"___~ _____ _
Date:. _____ y_I_L._I _, '_0 ___ _
Dean A. Kitchen
Date: _________ {.-.L(_~-"-)-C/""_-___'-('_"'(/'___
ij
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Test Purpose ............................................................ 1
Test Location and Type of Process .......................................... 1
Test Dates ............................................................. 1
Pollutants Tested and Methods Applied ...................................... 1
Test Participants ......................................................... 2
Deviations From EPA Methods ............................................. 2
Quality Assurance ....................................................... 2
Summary of Results
Emission Results ........................................................ 3
Process Data ............................................................ 3
Description of Collected Samples ........................................... 3
Discussion of Errors or Irregularities ......................................... 3
Percent Isokinetics ....................................................... 4
Source Operation
Process Control Devices Operation .......................................... 5
Process Representativeness ................................................ 5
Sampling and Analysis Procedures
Sampling Port Location ................................................... 6
Sampling Point Location .................................................. 6
Sampling Train Description ................................................ 6
Sampling and Analytical Procedures ......................................... 7
Qual ity Assurance ....................................................... 7
Appendices
A: Complete Results and Sample Calculations
B: Raw Field Data
C: Laboratory Data and Chain of Custody
D: Raw Production Data
E: Calibration Procedures and Results
F: Related Correspondence
iii
LIST OF TABLES
Table
I Measured Radionuclide Emissions .......................................... 3
II Percent Isokinetics ....................................................... 4
III Sampling Point Location .................................................. 6
IV Complete Results, North Yellow Cake Scrubber ...................... Appendix A
V Complete Results, Yellow Cake Dryer Baghouse ...................... Appendix A
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
I Facility Schematic Representation North Yellow Cake Scrubber .......... Appendix D
2 Facility Schematic Representation Yellow Cake Dryer Baghouse ......... Appendix D
3 Schematic of Method 51114 Sampling Train .......................... Appendix E
iv
INTRODUCTION
Test Purpose
This test project was conducted to determine the total radionuclide emissions from the North
Yellow Cake Scrubber and the Yellow Cake Dryer Baghouse exhausts in terms of Curies per dry
standard cubic foot (Ci/dscf).
The test samples were initially analyzed for only U-Nat but were re-analyzed for Th-230, Ra-
226, and Pb-21 O. The results from both sets of analyzes were combined for the total Cildscf.
Test Location and Type of Process
Denison Mines (USA) Corporation is located about 5 miles south of Blanding, Utah. Uranium
ore is processed into yellow cake, which is shipped to other facilities for additional processing.
There are two yellow cake dryers with individual scrubbers. Both dryer enclosures discharge
into the Dryer Baghouse. The Packaging enclosure also discharges into the Dryer Baghouse.
The North Yellow Cake (NYC) dryer was the only operating dryer at the time ofthe test. The
South Yellow Cake Dryer is currently not operational. The Grizzly Baghouse serves as the main
dust control device for the raw ore unloading and conveying to the processing building but was
not operating during this time period.
Stack schematics are shown as Figures 1 and 2 in Appendix D.
Test Dates
One test run was completed on the NYC Dryer December 15, 2009 and one run on December
16th •
One run was completed on the Dryer Baghouse December 15,2009.
Pollutants Tested and Methods Applied
The tests were a determination of radio nuclide emissions in accordance with EPA Method 5/114.
Test run filters and front wash residues were sent to Test America located in Richland,
Washington for radionuclide analysis.
Test Participants
Test Facil ity
State Agency
TETCO
Ryan Palmer
None
Doug Olsen
Joseph Kitchen
Deviations From EPA Methods
None
Quality Assurance
Mike McNamara
Testing procedures and sample recovery techniques were according to those outlined in the
Federal Register and the Quality Assurance Handbookfor Air Pollution Measurement Systems.
2
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Emission Results
Table I presents the findings ofthe test in Curies per dry standard cubic foot. Tables IV-VI in
Appendix A have more detailed information.
Table I. Measured Radionuclide Emissi ns
North Yellow Cake Yellow Cake Dryer
Run # Scrubber Baghouse
pC i/dscf pCi/hr pCi/dscf pCi/hr
2.074E+02 1.290E+07 1.060E+02 1.668E+07
2 2.82IE+02 1.79010+07
AVE 2.448E+02 1.540E+07 1.060E+02 1.668E07
Process Data
The process was operated according to standard procedures. All pertinent process data was
available for recording by agency personnel. Scrubber water flow, pressure drop readings (L;p)
were recorded and are found in Appendix D. The Dryer Baghouse pressure drop readings (L;p)
were recorded and are found on the test run sheets. Production data will be submitted by Denison
Mines.
Description of Collected Sam pies
The test filters for the North Yellow Cake Scrubber were heavily covered with a white or pinkish
white colored particulate. The front washes were clear in appearance.
The test filters for the Yellow Cake Dryer Baghouse were lightly colored with a tan colored
particulate. The front wash was clear in appearance.
Discussion of Errors or Irregularities
None
3
Percent Isokinetic Sampling
Each of the tests were isokinetic within the ± I 0% of 100% criterion specified in the Federal
Register. They also meet the Utah State Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air
Quality specification of isokinetic sampling point by point. Isokinetic values for each test run are
presented in Table II.
Table II. Percent Isokinetic Samlline:
North Yellow Cake Yellow Cake Dryer
Run # Scrubber Baghouse
2
99
100
4
I
96
SOURCE OPERATION
Process Control Devices Operation
All process control devices were operated normally. Recorded scrubber water flow, pressure and
baghouse Llp readings were recorded and are found on the test run sheets or in Appendix D.
Process Representativeness
The facility was operated normally. Production data was retained by Denison Mines.
5
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
Sampling Port Location
The inside diameter of the North Yellow Cake Scrubber stack is 18.0 inches. The two, four-inch
diameter sample port are located 6.3 diameters (9.5 feet) downstream from the last disturbance
and 6.3 diameters (9.5 feet) upstream fi'om the next disturbance. Figure I in Appendix D is a
schematic of the stack.
The inside diameter of the Yellow Cake Dryer Baghouse stack is 16.0 inches. The two, four-inch
diameter sample ports are located 28.38 diameters (454 inches) downstream fi'om the last
disturbance and 3.56 diameters (57 inches) upstream from the next disturbance. The sample port
locations are depicted in Figure 2 in Appendix D.
Sampling Point Location
Table 1Il shows the distance of each sampling point from the inside wall according to EPA
Method I. Each point is marked and identified with a wrapping of glass tape and numbered.
These points are determined by measuring the distance from the inside wall.
Table III. Sam lin Point Location
Sample Point
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Sampling Train Description
Distance (inches) from Insidc WaJl
NYC Scrubber
0.58 0.70
1.89 2.34
3.49 4.74
5.81 11.26
12.19 13.66
14.51 15.30
16.11
17.42
To determine the actual emission rates for this stack, 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Methods 1-5/114
were followed.
All sampling trains were made of inert materials, (Teflon, stainless steel and glass) to prevent
interference ofthe sampled gas and particulate.
6
The stack analyzers used to conduct Methods 1-5/114 are constructed to meet the specifications
outlined in the CFR. The temperature sensors are K-type thermocouples. Heater, vacuum and
pitot line connections have been designed to be interchangeable with all units used by the tester.
A 316 stainless steel probe liner was used for the tests. Figure 4 in Appendix E is a sketch of the
Methods 5/114 sampling train.
Sample boxes were prepared for testing by following the prescribed procedures outlined in
Methods 5/114.
Sampling aud Analytical Procedures
All sampling and analytical test procedures were as specified in 40 CPR 60, Appendix A,
Methods 5/114.
Quality Assurance
All equipment set-up, sampling procedures, sample recovery and equipment calibrations were
carried out according to the procedures specified in 40 CPR 60 and the Quality Assurance
Handbook/or Air Pollution Measurement Systems.
7
APPENDIX
A: Complete Results and Sample Calculations
B: Raw Field Data
C: Laboratory Data and Chain of Custody
D: Raw Production Data
E: Calibration Procedures and Results
F: Related Correspondence
8
APPENDIX A
Table IV Complete Results, North Yellow Cake Scrubber
Table V Complete Results, Yellow Cake Dryer Baghouse
Nomenclature
Sample Equations
A
Symbol
Date
Filter lis
Begin
End
Pbm
"'1-1
y
Vm
Tm
y",p
Wtwc
T,
Cp
D"
CO,
0,
N,&CO
Vl11std
Vw
BWs(nlCaSurcd)
Bws (sall'ralcd)
Bws
Xd
Md
M,
%1
T,
A,
Po
Pbp
p,
Q,
Q,
V,
Curies
Crad
ERrad
COMPLETE RESULTS
I )i,-:\J :-;0:, \H\,LS COI{POIL\ \ I( )'-, , 15\, \ ~"i )):-<<J, L'\ .0'\1-\
DcscriEtion
Time Test Bcgnll
Time Tesl Ended
Meier Baroilletric Pressure
Orifice Pressure Drop
Meter Calibration Y Faclor
Volume Gas Sampkd--MctcrConditions
A vg Meter TCJllpcralllre
Sq Root Velocity Head
Weight Waler Collected
Duration of Test
Pilol Tube Coeflicicn!
Nozzle Diameter
Volume % Carbon Dioxide
VOhll11C % Oxygen
Volume % Nitrogen and Carbon t\·jonoxide
Vohnnc Gas Sampled (Standard)
Volume Water Vapol
Fraction 1-1"0 in Slack Gas (lvleasured)
Fraction H!O in Stack Gas (Salurated)
Fraction 1'120 in Stack Gas *
Fraction of Dry Gas
Molecular WI. DI)' Gas
tvloJccular WI. Stack Gas
Percent lsokinetic
A vg Stack Temperature
Stack Cross Sectional Arca
Slack Static Pressure
Sample Portl3aromelric Pressure
Stack Pressure
Stack Gas Volumelric Flow Rate (SId)
Stack Gas VOlull1etric Flow Rate (Actual)
Velocity of Slack Gas
Radiolluclidcs per sample
Concentration of Radionuclides
Emission Rate of RadiOllUelidcs
Dimensions
In, Hg. Abs
In. liP
dimensionless
or
"F
Root In l!~O
Grams
Minutes
Dimensionless
Inches
Percent
Percen!
Percent
dscf
"r
Fraction
Fraction
Fraction
Fraction
Ib/lbnlOl
Ib/lbmol
Percellt
OF
Sq. Ft.
In. liP
In. Hg. Abs
In. Hg. Abs
dscfin
cfin
q)m
pCi
pCi/dscf
pei/h!
Run #1
1 ) 15.'O()
:'-:'0)
8; i:)
:,nB.()··jg
99 .. ')
0.2)2:";
::.;('1..')
.) [i(}
.un
H.0{J
0,117
0, J 17
i i'jf,
50242,0
Run #2
)). !6·i)i.}
):j.S::
)·un
s: i
!x y;
1.003
~l J ().ql.;f)
i ()"~.5
0,84
i ,1. /0
10
0.119
0,119
I i .. l.3
1.767
·0,OS3
70379,0
* If the measured moisture content is greater than the saturated moisltlre level (supersaturated),
the s,nurated moisture value will be used in all calculations (40 CFR 60, Method 4, Section 12.1.7).
NYC Scrubber dec 09
AVG
Symbol
Date Date
Filter #
Description
Begin Timc Tcst Began
End Time Test Ended
Pbm Meter Baromctric Pressure
L'-..H Orifice Pressure Drop
Y Meter Calibration Y Fnctor
TABLE V
COMPLETE RESULTS, PM
DENISON MINES CORPORATION
YELLOW CAKE DRYER BAGHOUSE
Dimensions
In. Hg. Abs
In. I!~O
dimensionless
Run 111
121J 5/09
5502
10:20
12:22
V In Volumc Gas Saulplcd--Meter Conditions
24.70
2.300
1.006
110.973
Tm Avg MctcrTempcrature
..JL'-..P Sq Root Velocity Head
Wtwc Weight Water Collected
'1't Duration orrest
Cp Pitot Tube Cocfficient
Dn Nozzle Diameter
CO2 Volume % Carbon Dioxide
O2 Volume % Oxygen
N2 & CO Volumc % Nitrogell and Carbon Monoxide
Vnlstd Volume Gas Sampled (Standard)
Vw Volume Water Vapor
Bws Fraction H"O in Stack Gas
Xd Fraction ofDI)' Gas
Md Molecular Wt. DI)' Gas
Ms Molecular Wt. Slack Gas
%1 I'ercentlsokinetic
Ts Avg Stack TelllJlerature
As Stack Cross Sectional Area
P G Stack Stalic Pressure
Pbp Sample POl1 Barometric Pressure
P s Slack PrcsslIl'e
Qs Stack Gas VolumetriC Flow Rate (Std)
Qa Slack Gas Volumetric Flow Ratc (Actual)
V s Velocity of Stack Gas
Curies Radionuelides per sample
Crad Concentration of Radio nuclides
ERrad Emission Rate of Radio nuclides
Root In. i-rp
Grams
Minutes
Dimensionless
Inches
Percent
Percent
Percent
dscr
scr
Fraction
Fraction
Ib/lblllOI
Ib/lbmol
Percent
OF
Sq. Ft.
In. I!~O
In.I-lg. Abs
In. Hg. Abs
dscfill
cfin
fj))n
pCi
pCi/dscr
pei/hr
102.9
0.6115
15.0
120
0.84
0.2725
0.00
20.90
79.10
87.040
0.707
0.008
0.992
28.84
28.75
95.7
60.4
1.396
-0.26
24.63
24.61 I
2.61E+03
3.15E+03
2.26E+03
9264.8
106.4433
1.668E+07
Dryer Baghouse dec 09
M5 Nomenclature
%1 ~ percent isokinetic, percent
A, ~ stack cross-sectional area (ft3)
AS"P ~ see ,J"p
Btu ~ unit heat value (British thermal unit)
Bw, ~ fraction of water in stack gas
CIl = concentration of particulate matter, back half (gr/dscf,lb/dscf, etc,)
C[= concentration of particulate matter, front half (gr/dscf,lb/dscf, etc.)
C",'''' = concentration of metals (ppm, flg/ft3, etc.) atomic symbol replaces "metal"
CO, = percent carbon dioxide in the stack gas
C" = pitot tube coefficient (0.84)
C -species symbol replaces x . x (iJvg)-
C X e<on) = actual gas concentration corrected to required percent 0,
"H -orifice prcssure drop (inches HP)
"H@ = orifice pressure (inches H20)
"I' = stack flow pressure differential (inches H20)
D, = diameter of the stack (feet)
D" ~ nozzle diameter (inches)
EA ~ percent excess air
ERIl = cmission rate of back half particulate (lb/hr)
ERr = emission rate ofhont halfpalticulate (lb/hr)
ERmlllBtu = emission rate per mmBtu or ton of fuel etc.
ERx = emission rate of compound which replaces x
k-fact ~ multiplier oftcst point "I' to determinc test point "H
L = length of rectangular stack (inches)
mBtu = thousand Btu
Md = molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis (lbllb-mol)
Mr = mass of pareiculate on filter (mg)
M,r -mass of particulate matter on filter and probe (mg)
mmBtu = million Btu
Mp = mass of particulate matter in probe (mg)
M, = molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis (g/gmol)
N, = percent nitrogen in the stack gas
O2 = percent oxygen in the stack gas
,J"P = average of the square roots of "I' (may also be referred to as AS"P)
Pb", ~ absolute barometric pressure at the dry gas meter (inches Hg)
Pb" ~ absolute barometric pressure at the sample location (inches Hg)
PC) = stack static pressure (inches HP)
P, = absolute stack pressure (inehes Hg)
P"d = absolute pressure at standard conditions (29.92 inches Hg.)
0= time of test (minutes)
Q, = stack gas volumetric flow rate (acfln)
Q, = stack gas volumetric flow rate (dsctin)
Qw = wet stack gas std. volumetric flow (ft3IInin, wscfm)
T, = stack temperature ('F)
T"" = absolute temperature at standard conditions (528'R)
M5 Nomenclature
Tt~ sce0
u", ~ mean molecular speed (cm/s)
Ym ~ sample volume (fl) at meter conditions
Ym"" ~ volume standard (dscl), sample volume adjusted to 68°F and 29.92 inches Hg.
Y, ~ velocity of stack gas (fpm)
Ywo ~ volumc water vapor (scl) at 68°F and 29.92 inchcs Hg.
W ~ Width of rectangular stack (inchcs)
Wt", = weight of the condensed water collected (grams)
X" = fraction of dry gas
Y ~ meter calibration V-factor (dimensionless)
Method 5
%1 ~ Ym",,' (T, + 460)· 10391 (0· Y,· 1',. Xd• 0,,2)
A, ~ (Os' 14) • rr
Bws = Vw / (VmSltt +Vw)
Cil ~ Mil • 0.01543 1 Ym,td
Cr ~ M", • 0.01543 1 Ymst"
Cx (oon) = CX("g)· (20.9 -desired %0,) 1 (20.9 -actual %02)
Do" = 2 • L· WI (L + W)
0""" = "{0.0269· (Pb", + 0.0735) 1 [(T", + 460)· C,,· X,,· "[(T, + 460)· M,) 1 (1',. ,:;P)]}
EA = (%0, -0.5 %CO) 1 [0.264 %N, -(%0, -0.5 %CO)]
ERIl = Cil • Q, • 0.00857
ERr = Cr· Q, • 0.00857
ER",,,,I3", = ERx 1 (mmBtu 1 hr)
K-fact = 846.72 • Dn4 • ,:;H@ • C/ • X/ • Md • 1', • (T", + 460) 1 [M, • (T, + 460) • (Pb", + MI 113.6)]
M" = CO, • 0.44 + 0, • 0.32 + N, ·0.28
M, = (M" • X,,) + (18 • 13",)
P,~ Pb,,+(PG /13.6)
Qa = Vs· As
Q, = Qa· Xd • Ps • T;t" 1 [(Ts + 460) • P;td]
Qw ~ Q,I X"
Ym;td = Ym· y. T",,· (Pb", -I L\H 113.6) 1 [P;ttl' (T", + 460)]
Y,'= 85.49·60· Cp· "':;1' • "[(T, + 460) 1 (I', • M,)]
Y"o ~ Wt"o· 0.04715
Xd=l-Bws
APPENDIXB
North Yellow Cake Scrubber
Preliminary Velocity Traverse and Sampling Point Location Data
Particulate Field Data
Yellow Cake Dryer Baghouse
Preliminary Velocity Traverse and Sampling Point Location Data
Particulate Field Data
B
North Yellow Cake Dryer Scrubber
PreliminaIY N Y Cake Serb ,
r
Facility International Uranium
Stack Identification North Yellow Cake Dryer Scrubber
Date 1"J7cc:-
N Barometric Pressure
Pblll 2'1: 1:12 in Hg Pbp 2'J::':b~ inHg
B -I Static Pressure (1'0)-0· 0 5:5 in H,O
-
Estimated Moisture (Bw,) 4-16 %
1 I\. Sample Height from Ground 70 feet
Comments:
Stack Diu, 18" Reference: 0"
Ports are 9.5' Upstream from next disturbance
Ports arc 9.5' Downstream from last disturbance
Traverse Percent Distance From: Ports
Point Diameter ID Reference A B C D l~ F
I 3.2 0.58 0.58 il'l-'t .u<{)
2 10.5 1.89 1.89 .0 ~'il
3 19.4 3.49 3.49 .0«
4 32.3 5.81 5.81 • t) <-16
5 67.7 12.19 12.19 .6~(P
6 80.6 14.51 14.51
7 89.5 16.11 16.11 . Dt,j'6' .0'>0
8 96.8 17.42 17.42
Averages:
Ts __ _ L Flow ---
IIP __ _ -VIIP __ _
L F10wj
III' .
<; Field Data Sheet
Plant Denison Mines
DGY! "p
Filler
""50 / TETCO e
Sample Box ___ _
Location Nor Yc!lowcake Dryer Scrubber
Operator. -I'b""''l
(~'i (5 1 li'bifIM':(U)li4'1;':}llsl_~'~' ;~
1 II 1 15 i!5014'~<i,n'l~II-Sil--I·"t--If vii 1( 1-7--11--1 v~~111-7?1y." 11"Jf" ICJD
Page J __ of Z. Run I' ~
i
"0 N
A
Pon Reference _0.0" S!ack Diameter 18" __
2 30 5Ih:-~ 'O<-{i -..-0 ~O Z--III -7Fl--2-5-7c:c '-!/o ""Si'if-'Port"" 9.5' Up",",mrmm""d;""b""
'-2 45 1~l..5·_31l .ol{t 'is" ~ '¥~ 'I-; [,-*_ 2-5'( 2_9" ~""1.,. t-t:'6 ,g-t-/03 Por(sarc 9.5' Downstream from Instdis!urbancc
Or.., t 1:tO 3 60 '7"> 'loS ,07 I-Iv I(D '7 IDLJ ~5\)~5 Zlp6 tf'1 "10 /0> A,,,m,dModoco -----±'.1. % '" -1 {i'zt 3 75 ';'1 J55 ,6410 -c,,;> -c, " I D D 11_<v 10 1. V', '-( \{ ! S--~ '1 L-Pmbe Z ?--(s:;
; 4 90 !.s~l[{D -o§;, I-LL( I-j-{'j J ! lot; 7:;1-: ?1t6 2'aY l;'( YY )6(" No,,\oC,lib,,"oo
Cp~
4 105 !'7(,,1·1.'1,> ,05'7 l'lv (-I u /0(,( 1.1-t'lS"l L" 1. C;Z--') II L/ :.3.:d 32:L </0 0 _ '-10 '-'
5 120 ~--r'-1'1(() -oW II-tj\> i-'ll> ( 11.c;-1Z-5Y Z~sf '20 5 CI ~y lie., /"'gO" 3'195;';,h"
5'i(l'P5 135 i~r" '00 (-(,"1 \-(.,,\1.:: /l-\ tv .. 1.'iL!7,"'--\ STIO~ I-{..' 0"8,, HC-Z--
6 150 50\p_~'n·\)~VI_1-L-\_VV(,( 11."7 I-011-1J 1.)O//S /6 1 ilL-; Co",o,,~
6 165 ! IcDt·L~·'? -0"'0 /''0'('' i-G't..-V i\'\ WI 'L.<-L U' t;;Y It) I II ~ )'-'oc", IQr) 3-
7 180 (pi -t~1-0 '0<;''], I-Ol! 1,011 III 1-(iV'Z,<';l 1-1':; c:;--" 10\ If"] "H@ {.r,. 5""',;;iGH,O
7 195 1(,'-\"'-)0050 '.0;1 I-J"j if IllS" 2. -:\-0 "2(,c[ 'fl.) &;'1.--iOO, Ii.>
8 II 121011(/,,16 -4-l\ll,05iJIIfOIIFOIJr u 111'(,7 1'0-:}0I'7-Jf91'L-1-\I';)~ II Ci'( I 10 '-y c~~~\~# ~1~I't :~pl~rl~~II~lli? 1L7'1&~~1 Ul2'11~
>i-111-'>-'--z,
Totall
F\vcraget
15'''II'{D
-------------,-----,
-J-o(,~'m",'"" [5. W· I Q0\ )
-t ",.-:c" \ '\1'\,; ~J4"l
C \/>0"-\ 0"
ofl V'
\ \ 'I;
Barometric Pressures
Pb", 2L(.-;.-o inllg
Pb" .2-y. &;:s __ 10 Ilg
P -O. oS" .5 in H,O H ____________ ._ _
Leak Ch~ck Pre Post 'I
""m;G (). OO}-D-o 0
,." '" H,' ,s z « u ..l2 liD
{>,IO: R~1O~,,(J7·"O=_!
" H,f?oG-liif'l'
u-?y
('7
Water Collected g
Tnn, S,mpled ~ cJ miG
Review
K'-@T~,
K= @T",
5
rr
Field Data Sheet
Plant -"'=:':::;':';;"'f"---f--
D", -"!'=:'~8-+'= . ,
Tr3ve'5C DGM
Poml In';
1 N', ;'0
1
.?
.?
1
3
6P
(.,u,u>
TETeo If<
Filter sL(fo Sample Box / .Tel $'/ -----
Location North,~JJowcake Dryer Scrubber
Operator" 171
-"--;--"-'--11 vaouuo'il Teillperatures n, DGM Temp (T.)
Stack{T,) \ Probe \ P,ohcO,,1 \ F!ll';:r \ Effiucnt\\ Out \ In DCSHed II ("II"
P<lgc L of~ Runi! (
i "0 N
A
Stack Diameter 1S" Port Reference _0.0"_
Ports arc 9.5' lipslfcam from next disturbance
Ports arc 9_5' Downstream from la,: disturbance
Assumed Moisture 4-13 %
Probe: t1--b Cp 0.84
Nozzle CalibratiOn ..:..C ~ .--(oD ,<-/~o
"'gO" 3"l"1~
GasBag HC-1..
Coo"l, ~ ,--1. f 0 tJ.. . /"(TO " . 2>.".. Y-faclor ' -~
DH@ }·b5:binH~()
Barometric Prcs\5cs
, Pb, __ ?-" . T r; " Hg 0.,'-'J-'"I' ::>. r Pb" _.___ In Hg r P" _ (). (5) 'c l-J,Q ~""k Cheer." (j) Pre Post 5 o,ou1" f',","" 0.00(" o· oot
z (J.O ,,,mH, Z 3-. 0 ~
ft;\J-?ft-r"", ,,,, o. 0
o ·00? I;,H,O o· -zq
20.0
Water Collected
Time Sampled
Review
0.0 on
/7-3 '-(.5 g p!; mm
<. ,
S fIeld Data Shect
AM;rnco fl....
Filtcr >"'\0"'--SampIcBox~~
Plant: Denison MIleS { Location· North X)!lowcakc Dryer Scrubber
Date: , 7<1 [(p\"1 Operator _~ i·t.o~Z-T-___ _
I
Tlw"rse ! Time DGM 6.P t.H :,~H,C) V,ccum Temperatures 0', I)GM Temp (T "')
bin! Clock Min (0) 1"') ,"II~" Desired Actual ,,,,iI,1 Stack (T,) Probe probCOul ['titer EfIlucnt Out in
;.r;t!~·.'7 1 ?f:'-{~ 0 'illD·SOI .0) .~" .(PV .// /-to ~1.71 l..'l.-~ /.7'-' '7,'{ :f-Y -:J-7;
'1i'X"/.:W 1 15 <;:It·(ol'l., .OX' .L~ ·(.y 'l.-"i"\ Vir; Vty 1.-[,« LtV 7:>'1 Ii
>1' 2 30 ,~l1-.ot~ .(}3& ·1-5 .1'; V {VI> '1J'1 q.C 1..'1/ CD 'irS '1
2 45 «'S,·(PO" .()')' .':fa i·tV V lOS ~1-v 71\ 1.1'l 5'T ~y !C'V
3 60 ,,-\ i . "\c, . 0 '> ~ /V'J . 'l"J '!? l ~ +-1..,,1--'2.7'1' 1-5~ '" -; C,cl 1 () ,
3 75 ~5.L.·>'71 '.7' ' '-1'5 .'1") '1/ Ib\.u 'l.-'1V 1..'5'(.. t.~ '?) '1l? W'
4 90 ~1o\·I'6'£ .1;>'>" /})' .1-<) 1.. IG\O ~ ... :, '/. e\ '/..:,to 5'~1 ID1..-Il'
4 105 v{f)v·'ii1.-i '0'1'1.",,, ·ct'1 "J lov z'> 't't '21-1.. 5\0 0"1 IlL--
5 120 ?r .,,'1V 'o~~ HL-11''1 V L:f 10'6' .[,;'" '2 'It\ L:t. t; '\ 11'("
5 135 C;;'1 ·0)1.. ·o~'6' \'')5'11·)'7' IP l(v '7-1. 11,(" 1.1P <;-"'l "i~ liS-
6 150 IqD~ .\,-{'{ ,cV I'll,? \ -t,(:,", II--+-1:-\ 11';Y 1-90 \ '11 1110
6 165 ",I ~~ '0(; \.) '\ ~'l,'t c; iC '1/-\'L I]C:~ 7k', 1;'(" \ 0U II 'j
7 180 0)1 -'it'7 'C"~ I·,,;,> :\'.'1.,4 C, \( t 1"t 7,v',> 1,.~\ ,'1 10\ It
( ~G<.I\I,{7 195 ",~,,-\<' ·Wl. 1·1-5 1·'tS u 11.') 7.S'6 ~(,,-(. '7(,\ '51-IDo I\~
(VII-' 8 210 IVj'-{ .qo .()(,1. \.rt" I·/{,C, Q I~LP '7,"'0 u\.;-t\i"I('~ 10\ Il'
,({VD ' 8 225 qS'i!"f+t 'Dt,V i'i.\ \:(..1 V II\; l..\l-t V)'0z,'-\ 5 0.0' I'~
.Ie; t-wll» 240 6[ "·t· :771
( 1'1 I
)-q5U.Ob'-\ I S'~ .'65'\ I , r---"HI
{<j:O,,\ /
V
.. '1<t;\ ---ji---f--jf------jf--II---I---II---II---+---+-+---+----jf-+---
Tota!
Average
CommcnlS
q: 0>
·U :';¥
\S-!o 01b ". __ _
o,if'"
,;,t-v \.
,
,
I I
Page __ L:-of __ 2 Run II '2---
i "0 N
A
Slack Diameter IS" Port Refercllce _0.0"_
Pons arc 9.5' Upstream from next disturbance
Ports arc 9.5' Downstream from last disturbance
Assumed MoiSlure 4-13 %
Probe Z 1=-& Cp ~
Nozzle Calibration
_ )"7 '1 ~ ,<{OO • 't: (,) C>
Avg Dn' J,.1"5'inehcs
Gas Bag L-t-
Console t..p \~ y.F'ctSl"~ \.00
.1.H@ ~nHP
Barometric Pressures
Pho< ... :<-!-___ 1-:_CJ ___ In IIg
Ph z<l.L., 3. inH<> , 0 ,j-Z--
p.d·
0.00 t,;cdkChCCk
f,';m'n
P'il' IJ ·0 S"~~ H,o
O,DO V -
lZ-'Ole",llg z..",
prZ '""R", D· 0
a.OOt' "H,OOZ-z.-
'L-V Water Collected g
Tim~ Sampled ~ min
Review
K'" @T,~
K~ @To,
)' Field Da1a Sheet
Plunt: -""""-",,,cc:p+-\-__
Date·
'Irs TETCO i2-
Filter .c; Sample Bo:>.: __ I/_
Location-North Ye wcakc Dryer Scrubber
OpCralOr" ____ V_-'-
T'3vt:r~c Time DGM' ~p----dH( .... f<,O) Vacuum Temperatures,',) DGM Temp (T",)
Poim Clock Min (0) (0') ',o!lP) Desired Actual '"Hp Stack (T,) Probe p,o!x:o"! Filler Emuent Oul In
1 1'1:'7 240 "lft,1·»L .o'i "'ID -"10 '7---11h 1:,1 1.(P[,,1J.( c:c; lor /16
Pagc~of~ Run!; 2.--
i BO N
A
1 255 tj1-'>1-~1 ·O'i .,1.. -17.-'VU"o/ 't-~'6 'lV\ tltk 5':>-/00 1 {<./ S"okD'''''''''_IS''_ Port Reference _00"_
2 270 "I'i"Ip·:'I~ .0<.( ''11. .C,-V 'u liS l(,'1I-t 1-<>'1'ls'6'" '1"i 113 Port"" 9.5' Up",,,,,,fw,,,,,,,",,,,b,,,,
2 285 '1 ")C.'O<1-< .O<{~ '~-i .c,~ ''7 laIC <iftt; l-Iq' '~\,I \0 \ 'i~ 1010 p,""" 9.5' Dow,,,,,,,,,f,,,,,l,,,,,,,,,b,,,,
3 300 linc;, Llvf ,()!..l<;' -C1t .'1V .'" D"I 1 ftc) ZilL "~I 111, 07, Jot( A,,,,,,odM,'''"'' 4·13 %
3 315 04)·001/ '04t:; .",t. .'1'(/!.-\ (0 1--1i'>1-?1? :5'i 0'3 '15 III Pmb, z.1-0 Cp~
4 330 ()t~:IIV ·b(,o 1'1'7 \-'1,> C; lie;' 1),\( 1,Sll te; 5: ~lI IU;
4 345 v3l)','{S ,()~ /'1\\ I·I\( \ii /D''6 1.10 ZV '1..(,"1 ,,-t-Vj) 1/:--'
5 360 /0'1('.0[,<;' ,010" /-1.."\ 1,1.<'1 C; lib 1.. r' 19'\ 1.\001'-1 f-t; 0 II '-'
5 375 /nt;\P 0., 'iN ,()I,;~ _.z. '\ J. 1.'1 ( n-11/]-0 til J-1-(p~ "'( j( '1 I I ()
6 390 Dbf·{s«lotJlvl 1~5 ,V) '7 11.· '[.'1'1 -z-tl (.1' t.\ I"c III
6 405 IOW.("c(J, ,0(,\ i \·0 l·zS \P 1.. 7;1'0 1.1./1 ~(y1 .... ,'t <;~I II I
7 420 ibg"l·L1'l'" 'O{;b 1·1.) \.'!. I" It' 111\ 'L5'~ l.J'lll..\" 0 c llli'L-
7 435 1()~1.q<{7 '65~ 1·\'6 I·\,-/ ~ ,'1.5' 'z..,~'\ 2V, 7Y' l{, "17 /1 I
8 450 110.5:;"\ .051' 1·11p \·\v "6 ['/.' '2.ln ·(.{fCJUP+ '-{t qq III
8 465 1i1--1.oC;c" 'O'i{ I·\'L. [·I-V '? /'L V ~-rU 1.[,[, 1Y-t-L/L.-'1'1 !I'U
l\i.n 480 if?, 1·1-I,'/, ,
[{,?'''\ID
,sr..o'10 II
II II II II !
To:al ,>:>\,\.'1~l> y V.~O<-\ ~<{:z-1 310'7"\ / (p<;(p t /
Noale Callbratiofl
.-:;'1'7 .)"1~ ,4-00 <.foe,
AvgDh 3,'11>inchcs
Gas Bag t-+L---c..
Console fJJ Y-factorV'~ 1··D~.3
'H@ U,s::k'oH,o
Bar01nctnc Pressures
Ph", 2'-j·:}D inHg
Pb" Z'-l' 6~mHg ,> p. -G'DS 3 'oHO
'ti-it"-;t.:--:z
! LeJk Check Pre G Post ...... ~ ""mm 0.000 c).DOS
vaCin~~Z'L-~
P(zC. pilot Rate 0·0 (). i)
~
lnH,O O-l,& () , 'J. <{
Water Collectcd I '25Cd
Time Sampled ~~O
Renew iq
Y .1..-1.1 0' \,01-\ 1I'-\;' I01..-S ,-Average
K= @To,
@T",
Con",,,!~t;
g
min
YeHow Cake Dryer Baghouse
Prelim 6 pts blank
Facility Denison Mines
Stack Identitication North Yellow Cake Dryer Baghousc
Date
i narometri(~ PresslIl'e
B Ph'l) in Hg PhI' ini-Ig
0 N Static Pressure (Pc;) in H2O
A Estimated Moisture (8ws) I %
Sample Height from Ground teet
COlllments:
Stack DJa. 16 Hcfewncc: 0
Ports arc 57" Upstream from next disturhance
rort~ arl~ 468" Downstream II"<m1 last distwbancc
Tnlvcrse Percent Distullcc From: Ports
Point Diameter IJ) Reference A B C 0 E F
I 4.4 0.70 0.70
2 14.6 2.34 2.34
3 29.6 4.74 4.74
4 70.4 11.26 11.26
5 85.4 13.66 13.66
6 95.6 1530 15.30
A verag,es:
Ts LFlow ------
;\1' ___ _ '>/L!.i' ___ _
KEY ~>
L!.P
;-./\ ~ __ FIeld Data She.:!
Plant: Ol;nison Mines
0", ';1.. liS' I 0')
Tr~"~rse Time DGM "p ,\H !~H,O,
I'NO! Ciock Min (0) (10', -,U,:)' Desired Actual
\) 1 IO··15l 0 )-'8'5. :>1.c, • 0,1 I·,L\ 11 If
2 "" .2."1'0> 3 5" .,,~ 2. • 0'1 I 2.0<7
3 OlD :3,01."151 .qo J'~I I Vii
4 :So 6\ \ be-, ·<'13 12 .<;'i 1'2. 64
5 "'0 3LO.1c;o ."11 2.~1 L.'1l
6 "'D <'30.'15'1 .... \0 2.'\' 2·'17
" 1 1\:1.2-lrD 'b40.00S ."-"i ! .11 1·7,;
2 ro ~'1q .$)"6 · 1-'\ I· '/,,/ ,.71
3 "6'0 3<;'1.792.. .3>1 I, 'j'2.. 11.0-
4 qv . ?LrL. ;2)'\ .<{o )"'<{1 :)"'-';1
5 100 37c:,v[q~ -~\!.{ 2·'is'\ 1-.'(f{
6 ltD :;; ~75 .01 · "I't. ;;. :,(1 ~.'l7
,1. '.1.1-12..1) "Q&.l'i1(
i
-_. ------_. ,-
TETCO Filt~r55 62.. Sample 80x __ C.
V~"lUm
,m!il;'
"7
"' 5
'" '{
'-i
"{
'1
<-f
.j
?{
.'"
Location' North '{cJlowcakl! Dryer Baghouse
O~rator' <\t>~ \( ~ YW e __
j Temperatures n-,
I Slack(T,) I Probe ! pr~bCO"t! filter I Emuent
CO 11 ";( ':)11-J./1. :':>)(
">'i '?70 ).71 d.70 3"1
?V 'Z-S"'if F70 }.1o 5A
5''1 Cl.7o :L7'L 27"-"1\
&0 ~1' :112. ). 'it--"1<1
(y,7... ').11->1'0 ).11 vi ~
UI J~o ;;21'2 :i}'1'L "'I l-
,-<'J J0~ :Jt..q 0'-11-'i3
1./3 ),.ld ?-17.. !?-12-"1;'
(/5' 'J-u") :;n. ;)1'>-"I"
IL, ).TL. 9-.1"-2-11 C:L
(.e~ .?-11 .;>1'2.. 0-71--5'"
Total I lb· qtS L -J 1. 3~'l52i )1.')) / J1-"5 ,/
.\\"cr3g~ 'i ,Ld1t)" / 4,:P/ lco.'-\ /
C()n'n>c"'~S ;I, Y \S"rY-A\'j T/I'Vot..
:Sv t::7.4P
C/ /(/:/.1' J'1
f(/~'</-,},7
:), 7 1/;(/ ),Y-.,: ,( r ), G
.' . ,(;-
I DG~l Temp {T.,.)
Out In
"0'\ ';I'Ll
Y'c. ~
'uie ?f/
'15 '0">
,0'0 If[
II o~ W)
lOr. I 1"5
Ie'! 1\1
\ , \ /1'\
/0') )1<1
ID\ 101
wo ,~1
I , I I
)l.-liA v
ID2..-'6'1 V
Pagc_I __ of_l_ Run#_!_
i
N
B AD
Stack Diameler 16" __ Port Reference _0.0"
Ports arc
Ports arc
~ Upstream from next dlsturn:U1CC
468" Downstream from last disturbance
Assumed Moisture --'-_%
Probe /j IgG Cp~
Noz7.le Calihration
....2!3... . 2.'72-...:J.:D. ....:n3
Avg Dn . ~ ,1.-5" inches
Gas Sa!! Ambient Air Con$()I~ 1
V-Factor ~it... 1.66(,
,'!-H@ ~ inH~O
Barometric Pressures
Pb", ;:2<:..1·10 in Hg
Pbr :;;;~·u3 inHg
p(; .:-.2-(, in H:O
l •• k("~'k Pre Post
ft'/min . bof.s, -ODD
vJCin !t.,; :2::' "l'
{',toi R31t t).D o.D
tn !!,O ,,\,e> ,,/,0
Water Co1!c:ctd IF. C/ g
Time Sampled J Z 0 min
R.:vkw
1(=0 ,gT",
K= @T",
NOIth Yellow Cake Scrubber
Sample Recovery
Gas Analysis Data (ORSA T)
Yellow Cake Dryer Baghouse
Sample Recovery
Gas Analysis Data (Ambient)
Chain of Custody
Lab Analysis
APPENDIXC
c
North Yellow Cake Dryer Scrubber
Method 5 6 imp
Facility: Denison Mine
Stack Identification: NYC Scrubber ~~~~-----------------------
Date: _-"-,I l.:J./.Li1'--___ _
Filter Number
550)
IMeINGER~
Filter Number
----, .. _.-
Final (g)
Initial (g)
Net (g)
Fina! (g)
Initial (g)
Net (g)
Run:
drop out
loo;).~
~3J.O
,,,,'0,"1
Run:
drop out .
'1 ~1-.'-i
"1:)'7.0
5'1::'. 't
Sample Box: B
Impmger Number
2 .l 1 4 1 5 6
Initial Volume of liquid (H20) in impirtgcrs, (ml)
I 100 I 100 I -, , ,
q~l, :) q Y\J. '1 I ~ Co.l::> 0> 8'1, I 'lob, '0
{'I('.£.( (,/10.0 ~'13. ) 584. :'> B5.3.(,
,2.'\."'{ L'-lo· '{ "P.( '\·8 57.,<-(
Total (g) ======
2. Sample Box:
Impmgcr Number
3 1 -1-I ~ 6
Initial Volume ofJiquid (HP) in impingcrs, (ml)
1 100 1 lOa 1 -Silica Gel , , . , .
'13"/'1; Cj 2.} 1-r; ()./ S'1 $</ Cjo(-j-
(, 2-'1'0 (,ne, , '13. l 5'lLB €l5D·or >( 0 . (, l1.-S'i I '(D·() (p, {_ SO '75
IMJ'JNGJill!i
Filter Number
Filter Number
Run: Sample Box:
..L
ImpingeI' Number
3 1 -1-1 5
Initial Yol\unc of liquid (liP) in impingcrs, (m!)
drop out 1 lOa 1 laO 1 Sillca (jcl
Final (£>----1'1'---+---11-----+---1----
Initial (g)----1.----+----+----I----+----
Net (g)===~===='====k===='====:b====
Total (g)========
Run: Sample Box:
Impmger Number
I ~ 2.1 3 14...15
Initial VolUllle ofJiquid (H20) in impingcrs, (ml)
drop out I 100 1 100 1 Silica Gel
Final (g)----+----+----+----l----+----
Initial (g)----+----+----+----l----+----
Net (g)===d,===b===b==,d===b~===
Total (g) ========
Phl1t~~~iJ~ IJ\V'~ j,ocatioll
Analytical Method, ORSAI .. ,_" ____ .
Date , .. I< .. !
Tcst No.-ilJlf-IfLL _-'+"---""
Gas !lag No. {.jC-~ t
Ambient TCl11p~
Opcrator~
Ilate {Z.ll~\O'\
Tes' No. 1..
Gas !Jag No. --:-qrL"-_-1"" .. -
Ambicll! Tcmp __ fr.pT<>f-__
Opcrat()f_-t~"--L __
Date
'[hi No.-----
(Ins Bag No, ____ _
Ambient Tcmp ____ _
Opcrator ____ _
RUN
I 2
A"(U;ll i\"(oj Actual !\('t
Gas n{'adiug R{,;ldiug
CO, 3, I ), I 3, I '3' r
O2 (Net is Ac(ual O2
Reading Minus Actual 1f$'D /'I.q (r'o 1'-1.,,"/ cO2 Reading).
N2 (Net is J 00 M intis " . ..... 'S"l-.J Actual O2 l~eading). '-.......... '/5Z·(j '.'.'.
RUN
I 2
AI'lual Net ,\,'IUIl! Nt,.
GII,~' Rl'adillg I~t'ading
CO2 ).1-).1-"'.~ ? .[.
0 1 (Net is Actual 0"
(\'\ \vlr-Reading Minus Actual 17 -'1 1+1-(;02 Reading),
Nt (Nd is 100 Minus
I·············· '.
GCI ' .. , '0 t\ Actual O2 [(cilding), C" •
RUN
I 2
At-hml Nd Actual r'><et
(;(1,\' H('lHlinJ,( Reading
CO,
O2 (Net is Adual O2
Reading Minus Actllil!
CO2 Rcading).
Nt (Net is 100 Minus
•••••••• « . Actual O2 Ih'ading). ··c
\)2 \v~IS delcrlllinl~d Ilsing a gas analyzer
CO is 110t measured, as il has the same molecular \Veigh! as N2
]
Arilwl
R('adill~
? (
I 3" '0
.
]
:\rtual
Itt'aclillg
,.1:
11-"
c . '.
3
At'tual
Reading
. .
'. '.
AV('.ntg(',
:'i." Nd
Volume
~. I ? /
I vi'1 I~;' 'i
n . il 'l-r. . f,.
An'rage
:\/('1 Net
Volume
Z, . -( ., • -V
H~" lc(r
il -n ~1\
Average
N('( Net
Volume
Yellow Cake Dryer Baghouse
Method 5
i'S" J i"-
Facility: Denison Mine Date: I L, --\-k ··0'1
Stack Identification: .cN:..Y"C::....:cB"'a"'gh"'o"u"'sc"-_____________ _
)M,fING£RS
Filter Number
iMJ?INGERS
Filter Number
Pi lter Number
Final (g)
Initial (g)
Net (g)
Run: Sample Box: (j
..L
Impmger Number
.l..1...J..1..i.1...i. ..i.
Initial Volume of liquid (l 120) in impingers, (m!)
100 100 I I SI]lc, Gel I , , , ,
(, 'irS· (p GO 5·'-\ C,Tl·v <iLl\S
70(,,· q 5ql.{ r. {ll I I '1 n. r..
-'2'\ 3 \3.,,\ :'> . "5 I~A
Total (g) J 5 . 0 =========
Run: Sample Box:
Impinge.-Number
..L -"= I 3 I -±-I 5
Initial Volume of liquid (H20) in impingcrs, (m1)
100 100 I I SI]lcaGc] I
Fiual (g) ____ +-___ +-___ + ___ + ___ + ___ _
Initial (g) ____ +-___ +-___ + ___ + ___ + ___ _
Net (g)====="====,====,=====",====,====
Total (g) ===.=.= .. = .. = .. = .... = ... = .. = ... =.
Run: Sample Box:
Impinger Number
..L 2
Initial VoluTI1e of liquid (H20) in impingcrs, (ml)
100 100 I I S(llcaGcl I
Final (g) ____ +-___ +-___ + ___ + ___ -+ ___ _
Initial (g)----+-----t----+----+----t-----
Net (g)===d====,===="===d====,====
Total (g) ======
IMPINGE!~
Filter Number
Run: Sample Box:
lmpmger Number
2 131-±-1..2..
Initial Volume of liquid (1120) in impingcrs, (m!)
100 100 I I SlllcaGcl I
Final (g)----t-------t------+----t-----+----
Initial (g)----t-----t------+---+---+----
Net (g)====,====,====k.==:d.===='====
Tolal (g)====.= .. = ..... = .. =.=. = .. _ ..... _ .....
Chain of
Custody Record
TAL-4124(iC07'
Temperature on Receipt __ _ TestAmerica
Drinking Water? Yes 0 . NoD THE LEADER iN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
ClieocT-c Jeo ;PCOJ"'Mana
gUe "" r::-,~c-L~'\ i
D7 ~<; cn,;nYi27'2eit
Address r: j Co 20 C' I ( \ Te!ephon'.3 Number (Area Code)/Fax Number I Lab Number 3 <7/ c 7s T ~,,-T '1 i 9-" I <[ '1 L C, 10 C, ! Page of
Cit;;, N1 ro I \ stat, I Zip Code ! Site Coora:,:! ! Lao Contact Analysis (Attach lisf if I t:!1'Je..-t"-......... f-v;" C r I ~ Cc.c<l" '" 1 i i more space is needed) I~I.D .-'. I I"! I'! PrOjectName~njLocatbn(Sta~) /-4 61<:ii-T;j rCarriCfIl'Va.ybilfNumber l, J! j ! I,' I '1 Qe., , i Cq vIA. v1 <-s 'f« !i' I -1--1 I I I I I I Spec/a/Instructions!
Conlract/Purchase Or.Jer!QuoleNo. l ,. I Containers & '1"1 I· I! Conditions of Receipt
i ,Matnx !. Preservative,S '7 1 ) I I I ! I
r I
Sample t.D. /1/0. and Description : D -. Ii j" I -i I ~ i3 \ 3 I )o~ 1"0;;:1 I ~ I ! ill I' I •••• 1 are lIme "t>"" ",",~i 7'_<::: -.) , J.ContamersforeachsampJemaybecombmedotJone/ine)j ~ .f, & ~.l j:3 ~ I ~ I ~ :'t I~::il 1 J i t J.! i
NyC (2"",, 11ft!"">5u\ IZI' Iz/'~~1 /[.4 Xi iii I Ii! iii ~ I I! [ !
F. lkK ,S"6l swo "...{ ,; kti 1 ' I 1 I' , Iii i ' I I 'I· i' -/ S'''i r ( fX.-., i I I ! 'I t ii, .
L
[
IV 'f LV".., t:--8" s-<.{Sv tz.2-i ,,),,1'1 ~ & I j( ~ : i , iii i i ,'.1 il I I ill
/ ·l~ "'..,."v 'I'" I I " 'I ' 1 r' --, -.Nn <i.~~ b«-("f, • , ! 1 1 . I . iii 'I ! !
8~7L"v,t: Ali" 5 roZ-~;lf-" IIZftS-!9! ", .. X!, . ! j ! I' ,1\, I I' : I' I ! i .. ... ::>. . I ! I r ,., I ,I
\' A ' I I I I J.-I ' I' I" I ' I . ' , , I F, • ...-",." "'~ 8«",'/ ! '" , ·1· ii" 'I ii' , I ! I I I. " --.L' I
I I ., j. III "I" Y 1\' I! I·: ! ) ! i lL_l ! 1 I I L I/~ LL' L \
1 ' . ; , I 1 I' I I i Y\ I ' , I j II 't::::::::b !.LL. i
! Iii! IlillY ')11--11 I' II
I I Iii U V I i II i II I !
i i '+_V! iii I I J '
1 " I' ,. J I I 1 1 f l' i I I, 1 I I ! ,
PossibJ& l-iizard JiJentifica!i:m
Non-Hazard 0 Flammable o Skin Irritant o PoismB I Sample DispOSEi o Unknown 0 Return To Client ® Disposer 8y Lab o Archive For ___ Mcnlhs
(A fee may be assessed if samples are reralned
longer than 1 month)
Turfl Around Time Required o 24H{)urs
2. Relinquished By J~
C i4 Days D 21 Days
, dC-i?i.q:;irements (Specify)
I
11. RecelvedSy :
T 2. Riiceive,TSy
f
i Dale i Time 13. ReCeived 8/
, I
3,RerinqulShed aY--V""
• \ ) 1 Com...,,,,,, L / r-I 0 0v ~QV\ (oV"""P~t-e-t:..-.~-;., [: ea.,.-"t (J/ t/)~,-r .-i e~c-:' CY ~ +<0 -U f-, C.,-,
jjJs.;m;;;;~:::N, I,·:-;·:-r::-.:'-'-::s;,-:;a"b '...:;:"."..,.-~(~>, 1-:-::.0;,,-;: ~-;:.r;!0';"i, .. -S~:;:?~e S!ii~...,iz.·;·-;,,:,~;e;~· (:::;;!";y --.~.-~ -------.---
Date---I Time ,
Date )timfl
i ,
joete I time
L
SDC No. Order No.
40842
TestAmerica
rptS'),LRchTitic v3.73
Analytical Data I'ackage Prepared For
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
4rh Qtr Blanding, Utah
Radiochemical Analysis By
TestAmerica
2800 G.w. Way, Richland Wa, 99354, (509)-375-3131.
Assigned Laboratory Code:
Data Package Contains 19 Pages
Report No.: 43125
Results in this report relate only to the sample(s) analyzed.
Client Sample II) (List Order) Lot-Sa No. Work Order Report DB II)
BAG HOUSE B# 5502 BH J9L230510-3 LRKAC1AA 9LRKAC10
NYC RUN 2B# 5482 R2 J9L230510-2 LRJ951AA 9LRJ9510
NYC RUN1 B# 5501 R1 J9L230510-1 LRJ9Q1AA 9LRJ9Q10
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
Batch No.
9358191
9358191
9358191
Certificate of Analysis
January 27, 2010
Denison Mines (USA) Corp
1050 17th Street, Suite 950
Denver, CO 80265
Attention: Dean Kitchen
Date Received at Lab
Project Name
Sample Type
SDG Number
I. Intl'oduction
December 23, 2009
Denison Mines 4'" Qtr Blanding, Utah
Three (3) Stack Filter Samples
40842
CASE NARRATIVE
On December 23,2009, three stack filter samples were received at TestAmerica's Richland laboratory for
radiochemical analysis. Upon receipt, the samples were assigned the TestAmerica identification numbers
as described on the cover page of the Analytical Data Package report form. The samples were assigned to
Lot Numbers J9L23051 O.
II. Sample Receipt
The samples were received in good condition and no anomalies were noted during check-in.
III. Analytical Results/Methodology
The analytical results for this report are presented by laboratory sample !D. Each set of data includes
sample identification information; analytical results and the appropriate associated statistical
uncertainties.
The analysis requested was:
Alpha Spectroscopy
Uranium-234, -235, -238 by method RL-ALP-004 (RICH-RC-5067)*
* SOP ID's changed effective 7-01-2008. Attached is a cross reference untillO's are changed over in all areas
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 2
Denison Mines (USA) Corp
January 27, 20 I 0
IV. Quality Control
The analytieal result for eaeh analysis performed includes a minimum of one laboratory eontrol sample
(LCS), and one reagent blank sample analysis. Any exeeptions have been noted in the "Comments"
section.
V. Comments
Alpha Speeh'oscoPY
Uranium-234. 235, 238
The aehieved reeovery yield of the matrix spike exceeds aceeptanee criteria. The sample aetivity is
greater than five times the expected yield from the matrix spike; therefore the data ean be aecepted. The
achieved MDA of the samples exceeds the detection limit. However, the sample activity execeds the
MDA and detection limit; therefore the data ean be aecepted. Exeept as noted, the LCS, bateh blank,
sample and sample duplieate results are within aeeeptance limits.
I eertify that this Certifieate of Analysis is in complianee with the SOW and/or NELAC, both technically
and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. The Laboratory Manager or a
designee, as verified by the following signature has authorized release oftbe data contained in this hard
copy data package.
Reviewed and approved:
Erika Jordan
Customer Service Manager
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 3
Isotope
Asbestos
AsbC'5t05
Alph~ -Gross
Alpha -Gross
Alpha -Gross
/\Ipha -Gross
Alpha -Gross
Am
Am
Beta -Gross
l}eta -Cross
Bet,\ -Cross
CJ4
C14
C14
C14
C14
Cm
Coliform
Coliform
Coliform
Cr6+
C]'6~
Fe
Fe55
Fe59
Gamll\~
H3
H3
1'13
H3
H3
1-13
Rich].md
SOP <
[IL-A5B-00l
I\L-ASB-002
/\ReltlVED
RL-GJ'C-OOI
lIL-GPC-007
RL-(;I'C-002
I\L-GPC-OOS
RL-ALP-003
I<.L-ALf'-010
RL-GPC-OOI
I\L-CPC-007
RL-GPC-008
II.L-15C-001
rll.-L5C-008
1\1.-15C-009
I\L-I..5e-Ol0
RL-LSC-Ol1
IIL-AI.I'·003
RL-IVC-OOI
I1L-\VC-002
III. WC-OOS
Ill. V'/COO3
RL-WC-004
RL-I.5C-01S
RL·L5C-016
RL-I.5e-016
I\L.cA~I-OOl
RIA..5C-OOI
RL-15C-003
RL LSC-004
RL LSC-005
RL LSC-007
RI.·L'OC-002
Update 7/01/08
Old Richland
SOP#
NfA
NfA
RICH-RI3·S035
IIICH-RC-S014
RICH-HC-S020
RICH-RC-S021
RICI-I-RC-S036
Method Reference Title
NIOSI I ?400 Flt>l'I' CO\lot'l\g by Phase CO'11ras11v1\cr(lSCOp)' based on NIOSH 7400
NIOSl-l9002 5i1mple J'rep ~nd Al\illysls for As\lO:>SlOS (bulk) by Polarl7.O.'d Light Mlrmsop), basl'<l on NIOSH 9002
Llqllld S(llItlll"tlon Annl/
Packard DETEfIl\,lINArrON OF GROSS ALi'IIA IN N/\SALSMEARS BY LIQUID SCiNTILLATION COUNTING
9310/ EPA SW846
900.0/ EPA 600 DETERMINATION OF GIIOSS ALPI IA AND GROSS BETA IN W MER BY MErllOD 9310
SM ?110lJ
EI'I\ 680 DETERl\lINArtON OFGROSS /\LI'IIA AND GROSS BETA IN SOIL, SHOREl.INESOIL, FOOD AND VEGETATION
00-02 EPA S20 DETERMINATfO"\' OF CROSS ALJ'HA ACTIVITY IN WATER BY COPRECII'ITATION
EIOOO / LANL PREPARATION OF AIR FILTERS F(W GROSS ALPltA/BETA AND COMI'OSITING AIR FII.TERS
Mo(i FW 725 / DOE0039T EXT
mel-I-RC-S072 Ch\'olll~tography SEPARATION OF AMERICIUM, CURIUl\!, AND URANIUM BY EXTRACTrON C!-IROMArCX;RAI'HY
Anl03/l'ul11lAsL 300
RICH-RC-S080 NI\S-N5-3006 SEQUENTIAL5EI'AI<'ATION OF PLUTONIUM AND AlvlERICIUM
9310/ EPA 51\'846
HICH-RC·SOI4 900.0/ EPA 61)0 DETE1~~IINATION OF GROSS /\L1'I-IA AND GI~OS5 BETA IN WATER 131' MEl! 10D 9310
SM 7110B
RICH-RC-5020 EPA 680 DETERMINATION OF CROSS ALPHA ANI)CROSs BETA IN SOIL, SHORELINE SOIL, FOOD AND VEGETATION
HICi-I-RC·5036 ErOOO / LANI. PREPARATION Ol~ Am FILTEflS r;QfI GROSS ALPltA/BETA AND CO~.f!'OSrrtNG AII~ I'IUEJIS
!\ICll-Hll-50!3 Mod j-J·02 / EPA 520 TRlTIU,\!, CAfWON.14, NICKEL-63 OR I'HOSI'HORUs-32 l\NALYSIS IN UlliNI'.
RICH-I\C-5022 EPA C·01 / EPA 520 CARBON '14 BY DIGESTION IvIETHOD
RICI-I·RC-S040 Mod C14 / EPA 680 DETImMINATION OFCARIlON-14 BY BENZENE SYNTHESIS
RICH-RC-5046 EPA C·01 / EPA 520 DETERMINATION OF CAII!30N-141N GRAI'IIITE AND SOIL
RICI1-RC-S047 ,\Iod 1-1-02 / EPA 520 DETERMINATION OFCARBON-1.1IN WATER BY DmE(TCOUNTING
Mod 1\1' 725 / DOE0089T EXT
RICH-RC-5072 ChrOll\Mor,raphy SEPARATION OF M.1ERI(lU)vl, CURIUM, AND UJIANIUM Ill' EXTRACnON CHROMAr(X:R/\I'HY
I~JCI-I-WC-5001 92221l DETEI~IvIINAnON OF TOTALCOLlFOJIM; MUl.TIPLE TUBE FEJIMENTATION TECHNIQUE
RICII-we-S002 9131 TOTAL COIJI'ORMS BY MEMIlRANIi 1:ILfRAJ'ION
JIICI1-WC-5007 9223 TOTAl. COLIFORM BY TilE COI,JLEln METHOD
RICl-I-WC-5003 7196A, SW846 DETERMINATION OF IlEXAVALENT CHROMIUM lCr(VI)] IN IVATER, SOIL, AND SIMILAR l\lATJIICE5
RJCH-WC-5005 3060/ SW846 DETERIvIINATION OF IIEXAVALENTCHRO~IIUM (CIVI) IN SOLID MATRICES WITH AI.KALlNF DlGESTION
EXT Chl'Olllcltogrilphy
RJCH-IIC-5074 ModFe55/PNI.._ALO_435 SEPARATION OF IRON AND NICKEL BY EXTRi\C.IJON CHROMAr(X;I~AI'HY
1\·1·73·014/ EI'A
lIICH-RC-5023 HAsL300 DETERMINATION OF IRON-55 AND 1RON-59IN IVATEI~
f.~4-73-014 / EPA
RICH-RC·50lS HASL300 DErERIvlINATION OF IRON·55 AND IRON-59 IN WATER
901.0/ HASL300
R1CH-I~C-5017 ASTM 03649 PREl',\I~ATION OF ALL l\IATRICES FOIl ANALYSIS BY GAMI\-IA SI'ECrROSCOPY
RICJI-I\[j·5013 Mod 1-1-02/ EPA 520 'rRrrJUM, CARBON-14, NICKEL-63 OR I'HOSPI-lORUS-32 ANALYSIS IN URINE
11JCIl-HIl-5034 7500-3/ SM DETERMINATION OF rRiTlUM Ii\' URINE BY DISTILLATION
RICH-RC·5004 H3/ EP!\ LV539 DETERIvIlNATION m TRITIUM IN Am
RICII-RC·SOO7 Mod '9{}6,0 / EPA 600 SEPARATION OF TRITIUM IN WATER ANP AQUEOUS COMPONENT OF WINE
11-3 by EE EPA I.VS39 /
RICH-RC-5024 I-iASL300 DETERMINATION OF LOIN LEVEl. TRITIUM IN \VATER BY EI.ECrROLYrJC ENRICHMENT
1-1·311\ W<lter/Tissue /
fIICH-RC-50.'!? LV 539 DETE1~MINAT10N OJ-TRiTlUl\l BY CRYOCENIC DISTILLATION
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 4
Isotope
1-13
1129
1131
1131
Metals
Ivlctals
N.
Np
Np
1'32
1'1'
1'0
1'0
['rep -lJlOass<ly
rep -Bloilssay
'rep -l3io~s5ay
Prep -BIOassay
'rep -Bloas",}'
['r('p -BIO,lssay
Prep -COUlll
I'n'j' -Count
I'rep -COlillt
Prep -Env
Prep -EllV
Prep -E,l\'
l'r(>p _ Enl'
Prep -l{(>Slll
1'I"I'P -Soil
Prep -Soil
Richland
SOP #
RL-LSC>OO6
RL-GAM-002
ARCHIVED
ARClIIVED
RIA.IT-OOl
RL-MT-002
gIAI'IT-003
R!. LSC:'OlS
fl.L 15C>001
RI.~AI_P-013
I~L-ALP-006
RL-I.5C-OOI
RL-ALP-Ol1
RI.-AU'-OO7
1\1 __ AI.P-012
ARCHIVED
RI,-l'l{I'-OOI
ARCl-llVlill
RI.-RPL-002
RIA'R!'-OO2
I~L-I~PL-003
RL-ALI'-016
RL-,\LI'-OIS
r~L-ALP-014
RL-KI'A-OOl
IU,-I'JW-004
RL-I'I,I'-OO7
RL-I'RP-OOS
RL-ALP-017
RL-f'I~I'-OO3
HIA'RP-005
Update 7/01/08
Old Richland
SOP#
RICH-RC-5048
RIC! I-RC-5025
RICH-RC-5025
RICI-l-RC-S049
f)i-II-MT-{XlOI
RICI-I-MT-ooOl
RICI-J-MT-0002
I<ICI-I-IvIT-0003
RICll-RC-5074
RICJ-I-Jl.lJ-S0l3
RICI-l-RC-5069
RICH-RC-SOO9
RICI-J-RC-5064
I~JClj-RB-SOI3
RICH-HC-S012
RICI1-f{ll-OOOI
RICH-RB-S002
RIClI-RIl·500~
1~ICH-RB-S036
1~IOI-RB-S037
RICl-I-RC-S028
HICH-I~C-S003
HICH-RC-5039
RICI !-I~C-5OSS
RICH-RC-SOI5
RICJ!-RC-S016
RICH-RC·S045
RICI H~C-S068
RICI !-lW-5018
RICH-RC-5013
RJCII-RC-5019
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
Method Reference Title
)-1-3 in Wal(>r /Tissue /
LV 539 TI~lTIUM PREPARATION IN )I,·lILK SAlvlPU>S
R4-73·0141/EPA ASrM
])2334 (Dlscon(lIlued) DETERMINATION OF IODINE-131 AND 1291N WATER ill' SOLVENT EXTRACTION ME'J'l-IOD
R4-73-0141/EI'A ASTM
D2334 (Discontinued) DETERMINATION OF IOI)INE-131 AND 1291N WATm;: BY SOLVENT EXTRAOION METHOD
HASL 300 (1983) DErER~IINATION OF IODINE-131 IN MILK BY BATCH 10N_P,XCI-lANGE
6010 lCP-AESI'ECmOSCOPY, SPECmOMETRIC METJ 100 FOg Tj{ACE ELEMENT ANALYSlS, MEHIOD 60l0A 1'01, lkchlel
60l0B ICI'-AE.'5 for TRACE EU,MENT ANALYSIS, METHO]) 6010ll
S\\'4863050B ACID DIGESTION FOr< ICI' ANALYSIS
NIOSI-I7300 DIGESTION PREI' based onlvll;T!IOD NIOSI17300
EXT Chromat{lr,r~ph)'
ModFe55/I'NI,_AID_435 SEI'I\RATION OF IRON AND NICKEL BY EXnV\C1'ION Ci-IROMAT(X;RAPI IY
)l,lod !-I-02/ EPA 520 TRITlU~j, CAIWON_14, NICKEI.-630R I'J-IOSI'IIORUS-32 ANAI.YSIS IN URINE
EXT Chromatography
Mod R1'300 / iX))iOQS9T SEPARATION OF NI-63 BY EXTRACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY
NA5-NS..3060 DETERMINATION 01: NEPTUNIUM-237 BY LIQUID-LIQuiD EXTRACnON IN ALL MI\TRICES
EXTChrolllatoer~ph)' SEPARATION OF NEPTUNIUM BY EXTRACTION CHROMA10GRAPHY
Mo(i H-02/ EPA 520 TRITIUM, CARllON-14, NICKEL-63 OR I'H05I'HORUS-32 ANALYSIS IN URINE
EXTChrom"-toer~ph)' DErERtv1JNATION OF LEAD-210 BY EXTRACTION CHROMAT(X;I~AI'I-IY
NAS-NS-3037
HASL300 DETERMINATION OF POLONIU,\1-210 IN URINE
1'0-01/ HASL 300
Mod UOl HASL300 Slil'ARATION OF ISOTOPIC URANIUl\'1 AND POLONIUM-210 IN WATER, SOIL AND FI1:rERS
I'gEPARAT10N FOR RAPID BIOASSAY ANALYSES
1\"lod l'u06/ IIASL300 J'REr'Af~ATION OF URINE AND j)j.oOD SAMPLES
ASTM ])1429.9'5 DETEI~MINMION OFSpr;CIIQCGRAVITY OF URINE
Plib 6490,6601/1'NL l'I~EI'ARATlON OF 5YNTliETIC URINE AND rECES USING RECIPES FROl\1 HI'S N13.30 I'REFORl\lANCE TESTING
LA-l0300-1\1 R200
ASTM D3865 PREI'AI~ATIO"\1 OF FECAL5AMI'U3 USING IIYDROFI,UORIC ACID DIGESTION
ICHP l'uhlir<ltlOn 23 PI~Ef'ARATJON OF SYNTHETIC URINE AND FECES
(;·03/I-IASL300
G-03/ HASL300
Amll Chem 1972
COPI~ECll'lrATION OF SOME ACriNIDES ON NEODYM1Ulvi FLUORIDE FOR ALPHA-f'ARlICI.E SPE(rROMETRY
EI.EcmODEPOSIT10N OF ACTINIDES
MOfl"Json & FrCls('r
NAS·NS-3050 ANJIYDI~OlJS IiTHEI~ EXTRACTION OF URANIt),'vj
ASTM / DS174-97 ENVJRON~lENTALSAMI'I.E I'I~EI'ARATION FOR URANIU)I,I BY I.ASEI~_INDUCED I'HOSPHOJUiSCENCE
Sr02/ I-IASL 300 ,I'REI'ARJ\TION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MATRICES
Mod l'u02/ HASI.300 PREI'AIMTION OF MIXED BED RESINS AND PI~E-FJLTERS
J\'lod ER100 / LA10300 PJ~EPi\RATION OF SOIL, VEGETATION AND AIR FILTElb BY :VlIXEDSTRONG ACID LEI\CHING
Mod Pull/ Mod 300 ION-EXCHANGE PREPARATION
Pu02A / HAS), 300 PREPARATION OF SOIL SAMPLE.S
D5259/ ASTM
SW 846/3015/3051/3052 PREPARATION AND DISSOLUTION OF SEIJIMENTS AND 5011 BY I"HCROWAVE BOMB DIGESTION
2
5
Isotope
I'rl'p-Soil
Prep _ Unnc
Prep-Watl'r
Po
I'll
I'u
rio
rio
j~n
535
Se79
Solul)Jlity
5'
5'
5,
5,·
Sr-Yt
T,
T("
Th
Th
u
u
u
u
u
u
Richland
SOP#
RL-i'RP-OO<i
RIA'I\P-009
RI?J'I~I'-010
I\L-J'RJ'-01O
AHCHIVED
RI.-ALI'-OO2
IIL-I\I.I'-010
RL-ALI'-ool
RL-I~A,OOl
1<1.-I\A·OOI
III.-RA-002
RL-LSC-019
AHCHIVED
RL·LSC-012
ARCHIVED
RL-GI'C-005
RL-GPC-006
ARCHIVED
ARCJ1IVED
RL-GI'C-003
RL-LSC_014
RI.-ISC0l3
RI.-ALP-008
111.-ALI'-005
RL-ALI'-012
RL-KI'A-002
RI.-Kf'A-003
RI.-AU'-004
RL-AI.P-003
1~I.-ALI'-OO9
Update 7101108
Old Richland
SOP # Method Reference Title
RICH-RC-5032 l'u021\ / HASL300 COlvll'LETE DISSOLUTION I3Y MIXED ACII)SIN A TEFLON BEAKER
RJCI-J-RC-5077 I\,jod ERloo / I.Al0300 rF:EPAI~ATION OFSI\IALLSOILSAMI'LES FOR GAMMA SPEC AND/OII IIADIOCHEM ANAL BY ACID DIGESTION
AJ1~I),t K,lCIl('mActa 1 992
RICH-RC-5086 RI'800 / DOE00089T URINE AND \-VATER SAMI'LE PREPARATION BY CALCIUM PHOSPHATE J'RECII'ITATIOt\i
All<IlytlC,lCiW'1l1 Act<l 1 992
RICH-RC-5086 RI'8oo / DOEDOO89T UI~INE AND WATER SAMPLE PREPARATION BY CALCIUM PHOSPHATE PRECIPITATION
RIC1-I-Rll·5015 )'u11 / HASL 300 RAPID DETEI,MINATION OF PLUTONIUM IN FECES
RICI-I-RC-5OJO Pull /1-IA5L300 DETERl\lINATION OF ISOTOPIC PLUTONIUM IN ALI MATIIICES
Am03 HASJ.300
RICH-RC-5080 Pul1/IIASL300 SEQUENTIALSEPAIMTION OF PLUTONIUM AND AMERICIUM
AJ1~1 ytl(,lChemActal9')2
RICI-I-IIC-5087 RP800 / 00E00069T DETERMINATION OF I'I.UTONIUM BY EX!'RACjION CI !ROMATOGRAI'IIY
RICI-I·RC-5005 903.1/ EPA 600 RADIUM·226 AND RADIUM-228 SEPARATION IN RADIOCi!EMICAL MATRICES _ ADAPTED FROM liPA 903.1 AND90~.O
RICI-I-RC-5005 904-.0/ EPA 600 RADIUM·226 AND RADIUM-228SEPARATJON IN RADIOCHEMICAL ,\-1ATRICE5 _ ADAPTED FROM EPA 903.1 AND 904.0
lvlod D2460/ ASHl
RICH-I~C-5027 903.0/ EPA 600 DI~rERMINATION OFTOTAL11ADIUM
RICH-RC-5082 913.0/ EPA DEfERMINAI"lON OF I{ADON-222 -AI)ApJ"ED FJ~OM MEnlOI) 913.0
Hlllebr~lld, !.ulld['('ll, Unghl,
RICH-RH-5020 Iloffm~1l 1953 DETERMINATION OF SULFUII-35IN UJ{INE
IIICH_IW_5D43 SelenIUm / NAS-NS·3030 RADIOOlEMICAl. DETERMINATION OF 5ELENJUM-79
RICH-RC-5035 Kaj(wMd&Th()m~s I'NI3716 DETERMINA"rlON OF SOLUBILITY OF RA1)IOACTlVE I'ARTJCLECONSTITUENTS
Mod S)"02/ HASL300 Mod
RICH-RH-5OO7 905.0/ EPA 600 DETERMINATION OF TOTALSTRONTIUt>·! IN URINE
1\100 5r02/ HASL300 Mod
R1CH-IW-5021 905.0/ EPA 600 DETERMINATION OFSTRONTIUI\! IN FECES
Mod Sr02:/ 1-11\51300 Mod
RICH-RB·5022 905.0/ EPA 600 DETERMINATION OF TOTALSTRONTlUlvllN UIIINE FOR RAI'ID ANALYSIS
Mod Sr02/ I-IASI.300 Mod
RICH-RB-5031 905.0/ EPA 600 RAPID J)ErErlt>lINATION OF TOTALSTRONTlUt>IIN FECE.S
Mod Sr02/1 IASL300 1\·lod
RIO I-RC-5006 905.0/ EPA 600 STRONTIUM SEI'AI~ATION IN ENVIR01<.1ENTAL MATRICES
MO(l SI02/IIA5l.300 Mod
IIICH-I\c·5071 905.0/ El'A 600 YTrRIUM_90SEPAI~ATlON FOR STRONTIUM·90 DETERMINATION IN ALL MATRICES
EXT Chrom~tow,lph)' Mod
RIClI-RC·5065 111'550/ DOE0089T DErER~IINATION QFTECHNETIUM-99 BY EXTRACnON CHROMA"r(X;RAPHY
IIICH-IIC-5078 TcOl / HASL300 SEl'ARATION OF TECIINETIUM-99IN Al.l. J'l-IATRICES
RICH-RB·5OO6 Mod ThOl/ HASL 300 SEI'ARATION OF THORIUt>l FROM UI~INE AND FECAL SAMPLES
Mod ThOI/ HAS!. 300 Anal
r~JCH-RC-5084 Chill' Acta 1982 DErERMJNATION OF THORIUM ISOTOPIC IN ENVIRONMENTAI.l\IATRICES
1'0·01 / H ASL 300
RICH-RC-5012 1\-10(1 UO! /llI\SL300 SEPARATION OF ISOTOPIC UI~ANIUM AND POLONIUt>!-210 IN WATEII, SOIL AND FILTERS
RICII-IIe-S03l Mod UOI /IIASL3oo SEI'AIIATION OF TOTAL URANIUI\·IIN IVATER I\NI) URINE
RICH-gC-5058 ))5174/ ASTM DETlml\!lNATION OF URANIUM BY I'HOSI'HORESCENCIi ANALYSIS
EXTChrom,'lograph), Mod
RICH-RC-5067 111'725/ ))OE0089"1" SEPARATION OF UJV\NIUM BY EXTRI\CnON CHIWMATOCRAI'HY
EXT Chrolll Mod 11.1'725 & 800
RICH-RC-5072 / ))OE0089"1" SEI'ARATION OF AMEmClUtvt CUI~IUM, AND URANIUM BY EXTI~AcnON CHROMAT(X~RAPllY
EXT Chromalogr,lphy Mod
IIICIi-J,C-5079 111'725/ J)OE0089T DErERMINATION OF ISOTOPIC URANIl!1\1IN Al.L t>IATRICES
3
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 6
Drinking Water Method Cross References
DRINKING WATER ASTM METHOD CROSS REFERENCES I
I
Referenced Method lsotope(s) TestAmerica Richland's SOP N
EPA 901.1 Cs-134,1-131 RL-GAM-001
EPA 900.0 Alpha & Beta RL-GPC-001
EPA 00-02 Gross Alpha (Copreeipitation) RL-GPC-002
EPA 903.0 Total Alpha Radium (Ra-226) RL-RA-002
EPA 903.1 Ra-226 RL-RA-001
EPA 904.0 Ra-228 RL-RA-001
EPA 905.0 Sr-89/90 RL-GPC-003
ASTM D5174 Uranium RL-KPA-003
EPA 906.0 Tritium RL-LSC-005
Results in this report relate only to the sample(s) analyzed.
Uncertainty Estimation
TestAmerica Richland has adopted the internationally accepted approach to estimating
uncertainties described in "NIST Technical Note 1297, 1994 Edition", The approach, "Law of Propagation
of Errol's", involves the identification of all variables in an analytical method which arc used to derive a
result. These variables arc related to the analytical result (R) by some functional relationship, R:= constants
* f(x,y,z, ... ), The components (x,y,z) arc evaluated to determine their contribution to the overall method
uncertainty. The individual component uncertainties (u)) are then combined using a statistical model that
provides the most probable overall unccrtainty valuc. AI! component uncertainties are categorized as type
A, evaluated by statistical methods, or type 13, evaluated by other means. Uncertainties not included in the
components, such as sample homogeneity, arc combined with the component uncertainty as thc square root
of the sum-of-the-squares of the individual uncertainties. The uncertainty associated with the derived result
is the combined uncertainty (ue) multiplied by the coverage factor (1,2, or 3).
When three or more sample replicates are used to derive the analytical result, the type A
uncertainty is the standard deviation of the mean value (Sf? n), where S is the standard deviation of the
derived results. The type 13 ullcertainties are all other random or non-random eomponcnts that are not
included in the standard deviation.
The derivation of the general IILaw of Propagation of El'rors" equations and specific example are
available on request.
T estAmerica
rptGcncralinfo v3.72
TestAmeriea Laboratories, Inc. 7
o.
Action Lev
Batch
llias
COCNo
i Count En'or (#s)
TotallJnccl't (#s)
Uc_ Combined
Uncertainty.
(#s), Covcl'age
FactoI'
CR))L (RL)
Lc
Lot-Sample No
M))ClM))A
I Pl'imary DetectOl'
Ratio 11-234/11·238
Rst/M))C
RstrrotlJccl't
Report ))Il No
RER
SDG
Sum Rpt Alpha
Spec Rst(s)
Work Ol'del'
Yield
TestAmerica
rptGcncrallnfo v3.72
..................._ ............ _ ... RElP_qrtDefini!i(lnl)____ ....... .....--..................--........... 1
An agreed upon activity level used to trigger some action when the final result is greater than or equal to the Action
Level. Often the Action Level is related to the Decision Limit.
The QC preparation batch number that relates laboratoty samples to QC samples that were prepared and analyzed
together.
Defined by the equation (RcsuIt/Expected)~ I as defined by ANSI N 13.30.
Chain of Custody Number assigned by the Client or TestAmerica.
Poisson counting statistics of the gross sample count and background. Thc uncertainty is absolute and in the same
units as the result. For L.iquid Scintillation Counting (LSC) the batch blank count is the background.
A!l known uncertainties associated with the preparation and analysis of the sample are propagated to give a measure
of the uncertainty associated with the result, Uc the comMned uncertainly. The uncertainty is absolute and in the
same units as thc result.
The coverage factor defines the width of the confidence interval, 1,2 or 3 standard deviations.
Contractual Required Detection Limit as deJ1ned in the Client's Statement Of Work or TestAmeriea "defim!t"
nominal detection limit. Ollen referred to the reporting level (RL)
Decision Level based on instrument background or blank, adjusted by the Efficiency, Chemical Yield, and Volume
associated with the sample. The Type I error probability is approximately 5%. Lc=(1.645 *
Sqrt(2*(BkgmdCnt/BkgmdCntMin)/SCntMin» * (CotlvFctl(EfFYld*Abn*VoJ) * IngrFct). For LSC methods the
batch blank is used as a measure of the background variability. Lc cannot be calculated when the background count
is zero.
Thc number assigned by the LIMS software to track samples received on the same day for a given client. The
sample number is a sequential number assignee! to each sample in the Lot.
Detection Level based on instrument background or blank, adjusted by the Efficiency, Chemical Yield, and Volume
with a Type I and II error probability of approximately 5%. MDC = (4.65 *
Sqrt«BkgmdCntlBkgrndCntMin)/SCntMin) + 2.711SCntMin) *' (ConvFct/(Eff* Yld * Abn * Vol) * IngrFct). For
LSC methods the batch blank is used as a measure of the background variability.
The instrument identifier associated with the analysis of the sample aliquot.
The 0-234 result divided by the U-238 result. The U~234/U-238 ratio for natural uranium in NIST SRM 4321 C is
1.038.
Ratio of the Result to the MDe. A value greater than I may indicate activity above background at a high level of
confidence. Caution should be used when applying this factor and it should be used in concert with the qualifiers
associated with the result.
Ratio of the Result to the Total Uncertainty. If the uncertainty has a coverage factor 01'2 a value greater than I may
indicate activity above background at approximately the 95% level of confidence assuming a two-sided conHdence
intelval. Caution should be uscd when applying this factor and it should be used in concert with the qualifiers
associated with the result.
Samp!e Identifier used by the rep0l1 system. The number is based upon the first five digits of the WOl'k Ordcl'
Number.
The equation Replicate Error Ratio "'" (S~D)/[sqrt(TPUs2+ TPUd2)] as defined by ICPT BOA where S is the original
sample result, 0 is the result ofthe duplicate, TPUs is the total unCct1ainty of the original sample and TPUd is the
total uncertainty ofthe duplicate sample.
Sample Delivery Group Number assigned by the Client or assigned by TestAmcrica upon sample receipt.
The sum of tile reported alpha spec results for tests derived from the same sample excluding duplicate result where
the results are in the same units.
The LIMS software assign test specific identifier.
The recovery of the tracer added to the sample such as Pu-242 used to trace a Pu~239/40 method.
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 8
Sample Results Summary Date: 27-Jan-10
TestAmerica
Ordered by Method, Batch No., Client Sample 10.
Report No. : 43125 SDG No: 40842
Client Id Tracer MOe or
Batch Work Order Parameter Result +~ Uncertainty ( 2s) Qual Units Yield MDA CRDL RER2
9358191 E2SS
BAG HOUSE B# 5502 BH
LRKAC1AA U-234 4.46E-03 +-1.4E-03 UCI/SA 111% 2.60E-OS 9.0SE-1S
U-23S 1.73E-04 +-8.0E-OS UCIISA 111% 2.60E-OS 9.0SE-1S
U-238 4.S8E-03 +-1.4E-03 UCI/SA 111% 3.43E-05 9.0SE-1S
NYC RUN 2B# 5482 R2
LRJ9S1AA U-234 3.39E-02 +-1.1E-02 UCI/SA 94% S.86E-OS 9.0SE-1S
U-23S 1.46E-03 +-S.2E-04 UCIISA 94% 3.63E-OS 9.0SE-1S
U-238 3.48E-02 +-1.2E-02 UCI/SA 94% S.S2E-OS 9.0SE-1S
NYC RUN1B# 5501 R1
LRJ901AA U-234 2.40E-02 +-8.0E-03 UCIISA 93% 4.73E-OS 9.0SE-1S
U-23S 1.14E-03 +-4.1 E-04 UCIISA 93% 3.64E-OS 9.0SE-1S
U-238 2.S0E-02 +-8.3E-03 UCI/SA 93% 6.92E-OS 9.0SE-1S
NYC RUN1B# 5501 R1 DUP
LRJ901AC U-234 2.28E-02 +-7.6E-03 UCIISA 102% 6.18E-OS 9.0SE-1S 0.2
U-23S 9.S0E-04 +-3.SE-04 UCI/SA 102% 4.71E-OS 9.0SE-1S 0.7
U-238 2.23E-02 +-7.4E-03 UCI/SA 102% S.7SE-OS 9.0SE-1S O.S
No, of Results: 12
TestAmerica IH~IU -Replicate Error Ratio -(S-D)//sqr'{(sq(fPl1s)+sq(J'I)lJd»] as defined by ICPT BOA,
rptSTLRchSaSum
mary2 VS.2.5
A2002
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 9
QC Results Summary
TestAmerica
Ordered by Method, Batch No, OC Type,.
Report No. : 43125
Batch
Work Order Parameter Result +~ Uncertainty ( 2s) Qual Units
E2SS
9358191 BLANK QC,
LRLQL1AA U-234 3.73E-09 +-1.3E-08 U UCI/SA
U-235 -2.49E-09 +-1.3E-08 U UCIISA
U-238 7.46E-09 +-1.8E-08 U UCIISA
9358191 LCS,
LRLQL1AD U-234 3.57E-06 +-9.7E-07 UCI/SA
LRLQL 1AC U-234 3.17E-06 +-8.7E-07 UCIISA
LRLQL1AD U-238 3.21 E-06 +-8.7E-07 UCI/SA
LRLQL 1AC U-238 3.31 E-06 +-9.0E-07 UCI/SA
9358191 MATRIX SPIKE, NYC RUN 2B# 5482 R2
LRJ951AC U-234 -1.77E-03 +-1.6E-02 U UCIISA
U-238 -3.44E-03 +-1.6E-02 U UCI/SA
No. of Results: 9
TestAmerica Bias ~ (RcsultlExpcctcd)-l as defined by ANSI NI3.30.
Date: 27-Jan-10
SDG No.: 40842
Tracer LCS
Yield Recovery Bias MDCIMDA
104% 3.51 E-08
104% 3.51E-08
104% 4.27E-08
109% 111% 0.1 3.57E-08
104% 97% 0.0 3.29E-08
109% 95% 0.0 2.71E-08
104% 97% 0.0 2.79E-08
98% 4.42E-05
98% 4.22E-05
rptSTLRchQcSum U Qual -Analyzed for but lIot detected above limiting cl'itel"ia. Limit criteria is less thall the Mdc/Mda or TotallJllccrt 01" not identified by
mary VS.2.5 A2002 gamma sCIln software.
TC5tAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 10
FORM I
SAMPLE RESULTS
Date: 27-Jan-10
Lab Name: TestAmerica
Lot-Sample No.: J9L230510-3
Client Sample 10: BAG HOUSE B# 5502 BH
SDG: 40842
Report No.: 43125
COC No.:
Collection Date: 12/15/200910:00:00 AM
Received Date: 12/23/2009 11 :00:00 AM
Matrix: FILTER
4rh Qtr Blanding, Utah Ordered by Client Sample ID, Batch No.
Result Count Total MOCIMOA, Rpt Unit, Yield RstIMDC, Analysis, Total Sa Aliquot
Parameter Qual Error ( 25) Uncert( 2 s) Action Lev Lc CRDL(Rl) RstITotUcert Prep Date Size Size
Batch: 9358191 E2SS Work Order. LRKAC1AA Report DB 10: 9LRKAC10
U·234 4.4SE-03 1.4E-03 2.60E-OS UCI/SA 111% (171.4) 1/2211006:28 a 127.16 0.14
S.6SE-06 9.0SE-1S (6.6) G G
U-235 1.73E-04 8.0E-OS 2.60E-OS UCIISA 111% (6.6) 112211006:28 a 127.16 0.14
S.6SE-06 9.0SE-1S (4.3) G G
U-238 4.58E-03 1AE-03 3A3E-05 UCIISA 111% (133.4) 112211006:28 a 127.16 0.14
9.79E-06 9.0SE-1S (6.6) G G
Ratio U~2341238 = 1.0
No. of Results: 3 Comments:
TestAmerica MDCIMDA,Lc -Detection, Decision Level based on instrument background or blank, adjusted by the sample Efficiency, Yield, and Volume.
rptSTLRchSample U Qual -Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. Limit criteria is less than the Mdc/Mda or Total Uncert or not identified by gamma scan software.
VS.2.S A2002
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 11
Primary
Detector
ALP6
ALP6
ALP6
FORM I
SAMPLE RESULTS
Date: 27 -Jan-1 0
Lab Name: TestAmerica
Lot-Sample No.: J9L230510-2
Client Sample ID: NYC RUN 2B# 5482 R2
SDG: 40842
Report No. : 43125
CDC No.:
Collection Date: 12/16/20098:00:00 AM
Received Date: 12/23/200911 :00:00 AM
Matrix: FILTER
4rh Qtr Blanding, Utah Ordered by ClientSample ID, Batch No.
Result Count Total MDClMDA, Rpt Unit, Yield RstlMDC, Analysis, Total Sa Aliquot
Parameter Qual Error ( 2s) Uncert( 2 s) Action lev Lc CRDL(RL) RstlTotUcert Prep Date Size Size
Batch: 9358191 E2SS Work Order: LRJ951AA Report DB 10: 9LRJ9510
U-234 3.39E-02 1.1E-02 5.86E-05 UCI/SA 94% (579) 1/22/1006:28 a 107.58 0.12
2.15E-05 9.05E-15 (6) G G
U-235 1.46E-03 5.2E-04 3.63E-05 UCI/SA 94% (403) 1/22/10 06:28 a 107.58 0.12
1.03E-05 9.05E-15 (5.6) G G
U-238 3.48E-02 1.2E-02 5.52E-05 UCI/SA 94% (629.8) 1/2211 0 06:28 a 107.58 0.12
1.98E-05 9.05E-15 (6) G G
--_.
Ratio U-234/238 = 1.0
No. of Results: 3 Comments:
TestAmerica MDCIMDA,Lc -Detection, Decision Level based on instrument background or blank, adjusted by the sample Efficiency, Yield, and Volume.
rptSTLRchSample
VS.2.5 A2002
U Qual-Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. limit criteria is less than the Mdc/Mda or Total Uncert or not identified by gamma scan software.
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 12
Primary
Detector
ALP4
ALP4
ALP4
FORM I
SAMPLE RESULTS
Date: 27 -Jan-1 0
Lab Name: TestAmerica
Lot-Sample No.: J9L230510-1
Client Sample 10: NYC RUN1 B# 5501 R1
SDG: 40842
Report No.: 43125
CDC No.:
Collection Date: 12/15/20098:00:00 AM
Received Date: 12/23/2009 11 :00:00 AM
Matrix: FILTER
4rh Qtr Blanding, Utah Ordered by Client Sample ID, Batch No.
Result Count Total MDCIMDA, Rpt Unit, Yield RstlMDC, Analysis, Total Sa Aliquot
Parameter Qual Error ( 2 s) Uncert( 2 s) Action Lev Lc CRDL(RL) RstITotUcert Prep Date Size Size
Batch: 9358191 E2SS Work Order: LRJ9Q1AA Report DB 10: 9LRJ9Q10
U-234 2.40E-02 8.0E-03 4.73E-05 UCIISA 93% (506.8) 1/2211006:28 a 107.81 0.12
1.59E-05 9.05E-15 (6) G G
U-235 1.14E-03 4.1 E-04 3.64E-05 UCI/SA 93% (31.4) 1/22/10 06:28 a 107.81 0.12
1.04E-05 9.05E-15 (5.5) G G
U-238 2.50E-02 8.3E-03 6.92E-05 UCI/SA 93% (361.7) 1/22/1006:28 a 107.81 0.12
2.68E-05 9.05E-15 (6) G G
Ratio U-2341238 = 1.0
No. of Results: 3 Comments:
TestAmerica MDClMDA,Lc -Detection, Decision Level based on instrument background or blank, adjusted by the sample Efficiency, Yield, and Volume.
rptSTLRchSample U Qual-Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. limit criteria is less than the Mdc/Mda or Total Uncert or not identified by gamma scan software.
VS.2.S A2002
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 13
Primary
Detector
ALP1
ALP1
ALP1
FORM II Date: 27-Jan-10
DUPLICATE RESULTS
Lab Name: T estAmerica SDG: 40842 Collection Date: 12/15/20098:00:00 AM
Lot-Sample No.: J9L230510-1 Report No.: 43125 Received Date: 12/23/200911:00:00 AM
Client Sample ID: NYC RUN1B# 5501 R1 DUP COC No.: Matrix: FILTER
Result, Count Total MDCIMDA. Rpt Unit, RstlMDC, Analysis, Total Sa Aliquot Primary
Parameter Orig Rst Qual Error ( 2 s) Uncert( 2 s) Action Lev CRDL Yield RstITotUcert Prep Date Size Size Detector
Batch: 9358191 E2SS Work Order: LRJ9Q1AC Report DB 10; LRJ9Q1CR Ori9 Sa DB 10: 9LRJ9Q10
U·234 2.28E-02 7.6E-03 6.18E-05 UCI/SA 102% (368.1) 1/22/1006:28 a 107.81 0.12 ALP3
2.40E-02 RER20.2 9.05E-15 (6.) G G
U·235 9.50E-04 3.5E-04 4.71E-05 UCIISA 102% (20.2) 1/22/1006:28 a 107.81 0.12 ALP3
1.14E-03 RER20.7 9.05E-15 (5.5) G G
U-238 2.23E-02 7.4E-03 S.75E-OS UCIISA 102% (388.7) 1/22/1006:28 a 107.81 0.12 ALP3
2.S0E-02 RER20.5 9.0SE-1S (6.) G G
Ratio U~2341238 = 1.0 Alpha Spec Result Sum -4.6E-02
No. of Results: 3 Comments:
TestAmerica RERZ -Replicate Error Ratio"" (S-D)/[sqrt(sq(TPUs)+sq(TPUd))J as defined by lePT BOA.
rptSTLRchDupV5.2 MDqMDA.Lc -Detection. Decision Le,,'cl based on instrument background or blank. adjusted by the sample Efficiency, Yield, and Volume.
.5A2002
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 14
FORM II
BLANK RESULTS
Lab Name: TestAmerica SDG: 40842
Matrix: FILTER Report No.: 43125
Count Total MOCIMOA, Rpt Unit, Rst/MOC, Analysis, Total Sa
Parameter Result Qual Error (2 s) Uncert{ 2 s) Lc CROL Yield RstITotUcert Prep Date Size
Batch: 9358191 E2SS Work Order: LRLQL 1M Report DB 10: LRLQL 1AB
U-234 3.73E-09 U 1.3E-08 3.51 E-08 UCIISA 104% 0.11 1122110 06:28 a 0.16
9.15E-09 9.05E-15 0.58 G
U-235 -2.49E-09 U 1.3E-08 3.51 E-08 UCIISA 104% -0.07 112211006:28 a 0.16
9.15E-09 9.05E-15 -0.38 G
U-238 7.46E-09 U 1.BE-08 4.27E-08 UCIISA 104%) 0.17 1122110 06:28 a 0.16
1.29E-08 9.05E-15 0.81 G
Ratio U-2341238 = 0.5
No. of Results: 3 Comments:
TestAmerica MDCIMDA,lc -Detection, Decision Level based on instrument background or blank, adjusted by the sample Efficiency, Yield. and Volume.
rptSTLRchBlank
VS.2.5 A2002
U Qual-Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. Limit criteria is less tban the Mdc/Mda or Total Unccrt or not identified by gamma scan software.
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 15
Date: 27-Jan-10
Aliquot Primary
Size Detector
0.16 ALP7
G
0.16 ALP7
G
0.16 ALP7
G
Lab Name: TestAmerica
Matrix: FILTER
Count
Parameter Result Qual Error ( 2s)
Batch: 9358191 E2SS
U-234 3.17E-06
U-238 3.31 E-06
Batch: 9358191 E2SS
U-234 3.57E-06
U-238 3.21 E-06
No. of Results: 4 Comments:
FORM 1/
LeS RESULTS
Total Report Expected
Uncert( 2 $) MDCiMDA Unit Yield Expected Uncert
Work Order: LRLQL 1AC Report DB 10: LRLQL 1CS
S.7E-07 3.29E-OS UCI/SA 104% 3.27E-06 1.93E-OS
Rec Limits: 75 125
9.0E-07 2.79E-OS UCI/SA 104% 3.42E-06 2.02E-OS
Rec Limits: 75 125
Work Order: LRLQL 1AD Report DB 10: LRLQL 1 DS
9.7E-07 3.57E-OS UCIISA 109% 3.21 E-06 1.90E-OS
Rec Limits: 75 125
S.7E-07 2.71E-OS UCI/SA 109% 3.36E-06 1.99E-OS
Rec limits: 75 125
TestAmerica
rptSTLRchLc$
VS.2.5 A2002
Bias ~ (ResuIUExpected)-1 as defined by A~SJ N13.30.
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 16
Date: 27-Jan-10
SDG: 40842
Report No.: 43125
Recovery, Analysis, Aliquot Primary
Bias Prep Date Size Detector
97% 1/22/1006:29 a 0.17 ALPS
0.0 G
97% 1/2211006:29 a 0.17 ALPS
0.0 G
111% 1/2211006:29 a 0.17 ALP9
0.1 G
95% 1/22/10 06:29 a 0.17 ALP9
0.0 G
FORM II
MATRIX SPIKE RESULTS
Lab Name: TestAmerica SDG: 40842
Lot-Sample No.: J9L230510-2. NYC RUN 28# 5482 R2 Report No.: 43125
Parameter
Batch: 9358191
U-234
U-238
SpikeResult,
Qrig Rst
Count
Qual Error ( 2 s)
Work Order: LRJ951AC
-1.77E-03 U
3.39E-02
-3.44E-03 U
3.48E-02
Total Rpt Unit, Recw
Uncert( 25) MDCjMDA CRDL Yield overy
Report DB 10: LRJ951CW Ori9 Sa DB 10: 9LRJ9510
1.6E-02 4.42E-05 UCIISA 98%
1.6E-02 4.22E-05 UCIISA 98%
Number of Results: 2
Comments:
TestAmerica RER -Replicate Error Ratio = (S-D)/[sqrt(sq(TPUs)+sq(TPUd))] as defined by ICPT BOA.
Bias -(ResultlExpected)-1 as defined by ANSI N13.30.
Expected,
Uncert
Date: 27-Jan-10
Matrix: FILTER
Analysis,
Prep Date
1/22/10 06:28 a
1/22/10 06:28 a
Aliquot
Size
0.12
G
0.12
G
Analy Method,
Primary Detector
E2SS
ALP5
E2SS
ALP5
rptSTLRchMs
V5.2.S A2002 U Qual -Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. Limit criteria is less than the Mdc/Mda or Total Uncert or not identified by gamma scan software.
TestAmerica Laboratories. Inc. 17
~ ;;
:3 " ::l. (> '" r '" cr-o ;J o ~ o·
J"
" "
00
Chain of
Custody Record
~ ,,.., .... -.''''~l'vv'l . ~~.-""'} f'-'\"'~d'"
Temperature on Receipt __ _ TestAmerica
Drink;ng Water? Yes 0 No 0 THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
Client -r-I Project MBnagen \/" 1 f Date / / Chain of evs;:r Number
l-c.kD !Je"'"1 f-....<+d-... " fZ--/f<7/0<; 11~724
Address I I r j 0 20 S f C, Telephone Number (Area Gode)IFax Nurn/:;$r Lab NWlber "3 '7 r::: "7-<; T " -T 9-" I 'f 'I z. <? () (., Page of
ClfJ:. Nl .r' Ie. l~at1 j Zip Code Sire Contact Lab Contact Analysis (Attach list {f
1J"'f' Jerl','''-........ 'f-u, l..r'j"-I ~'t"(l a "3 i more space is neededj
prOje~ame~dLocatiOn(Sta~) /, t3(~"1r.L'w.' Camer/WaybilfNumber J/~, ~Oq vIA''''''"'' L( \:\> . ilL l..,1 -I-Special InstructionS!
Contract/Purchase Order/Ouote No. . Containers & ..,. Conditions of Receipt
MatriX PreseJVatives ~
(
[
Sampfe1.D. No. and Description D t n §. ~ 3 <'> ~ ~e ~ ;:'i\ .. u.. .. (!) '7 ~ r
';onlalners for each sample maybe combined on ondne) ae {me ~ ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~, )L.l+. rJLO-1 /
N '{ (.. tz"", I I'" 55 D \ tZ I • 1Z 1'51"1 15 A-X '/.. Ik II lIe, 1./ "-'-"'P/Y\.J I
f.'~ ";~~frD .. ..A &~~
NiL ~v"'V 6" 5<{~vtz..2-17.-{"/41 '6'& f.. f. :.: I }iI/'Ct:::" J7L 2=~OrS-
[
f·t...-s $«1"'-' .Nn c,.~.! 6""'" JI ~7 C;~ < . ' B~7~"ir,e ($"" >502-e-tt nItS-I"'! /0" f.. 1-. Y'. 7l0' (h 1't./P-llJJJ
p. \(. ...... "D..... ", .. A 8«("./ • { (
_____ \\\\\II\I'i\\I\lIl\\\\I\\\\\\\\\
J9[230510 ----------------
1
:J,ssible Hazard Identification l~ampfe Disposal (A fee may be assessed ifsampfes are retaIned
~ Non-Hazard 0 Flammable 0 Skin Irritant 0 Poison B ' 0 Unknown 10 Return To Client l3J. Disposal By Lab 0 ArchiVe For ___ Months ItJnge{ than 1 month)
Tum Around TIme Required ,4-5 ,'1'[ rJ ex: Requirements (Specify) ,-, ., .d o 24 Hours O_~ '!ours 0 7 Days 0 14 Days 0 21 Days [i.}-Other Vhe-~ /' ;' . l
,.RermqU;sh,dM ()!y D~ezh,kl"m~A ~;~;r:::c..f/4.,aA.c. At.. -" "/&4;c"di';;:';uC;jJF7/J17');
2. ReJil7quishedBy ,,~ 60-t(;~ t~[}!!.. nm~1I7 i2.ReceiVMBY V Date TJITls
3. Relinquished 8y Date I Tone 3. Received By Date Tune
Comm:::\o,,-Co.-.P£,.J.-e.-f"" .... j Dec..", ov ,p..~f -te-i-co CY 1e+"o-Ut-. C"'....,.
n'C>T"",£>IITY"lA'. "t1J,-n:; .. On'" _..s'n ..... ,,_-" _~I" On __ ...... r:ANA~Y •. ~'"'' wilh fh". .~:>m-'-' elu,... 0:,_,-' ..... __ " 1po;I, rplt:, ~opy ry,
D '2 o
TestAmerica *ifF
THE LEAOeR IN ENVIR'ONMENTAL r~STING
. . Sample Check·in List l \ \AYY'-.
Date/fime Received:. Ill. :s 09 GM Screen Results (out) , <{; (in)'-_'~c(:::· Jr-. _lnitilrl~ ~:r:O~ __ -l-__ . __ S_D_G_#:. Chain OfCustO:~~ J jJ~-----~"
Shipping ContainerlD:'_--i_~ ____ ~irBill #--------'------46
Item I through 5 for shippingjcontainer only, Initial appropriate-response,
I.
2.
3.
4.
Custody Seals on:sh~pping cont~er intact?
CUstody Seals dated :and signedf7 .
Chain of Custody re~ord present?
Cooler temperature: ... ___ N46
Yes [ No[
Yes ( No [
No Custody se~
No Custody se~ .1i4'6 No[
5.Venniculite/packing materials is NA [ J Wet [ JD~
[tern 6 through 10 for samples .. Initial ap,propri~te response.
6, Number·ofsainples i1 shipping container (Each sample may contain multiple bottles):, _______ _
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12,
13,
Sample hold.i.ng times exceeded? .
YF.,Y'les have:
-~tape
__ custody seals
~esaie:
~ good condition __ broken
NA[ J Yes [
~hazard labels
. .-r e-appropriate sample. labels
leaking
--have air bubbles
IN.~
-M'IfaJ, (Only for samples requiring head space)
samplePHtaken?NA~H<2[ ) pH>2( ) pH>9 [1 Amount ofHN03 Added, __ -,-_
Sample Location, Sample Colleetor Listed? *
*For documentation only. No correct~y.e action needed,
Were any anomalies identified in sample receipt?
Description of anomalies (include sample numbers): NA [ J, ____ . _____________ -
see other side for additional com:rnents
Sample Custodian; ____ -------------Date:;_-------~---~---
Client. Informed onby _____ '-__ Person contacted, _________ _
J,\(NoawonnecesC''l' wocess.sis, I_
. Project Manager UA~ ~
LS-023, Rev.lO, 10109 .
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 19
sue No. Order No.
41040
TestAmerica
I"ptSTLRchTitle v3.73
TestAmcrica Laboratories) Inc.
Analytical Data Package Prepared For
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
DENISON MINES 4th QTR -BLANDING, UT
Radiochemical Analysis By
TestAmerica
2800 G. W. Way, Richland Wa, 99354, (509)-375-3131.
Assigned Laboratory Code:
Data Package Contains 17 Pages
Report No.: 43578
Results in this report relate only to the sample(s) analyzed.
Client Sample I() (List Order) Lot-Sa No. Work Order Report UB I()
BAG HOUSE B# 5502 BH JOC010474-3 LV62V1AD 9LV62V10
BAGHOUSE B# 5502 BH JOC010474-3 LV62V1AC 9LV62V10
BAGHOUSE B# 5502 BH JOC010474-3 LV62V3AA 9LV62V30
NYC RUN 2 B# 5482 R2 JOC010474-2 LV62T1AD 9LV62T10
NYC RUN 2 B# 5482 R2 JOC01 0474-2 LV62T1AC 9LV62T10
NYC RUN 2 B# 5482 R2 JOC010474-2 LV62T2AA 9LV62T20
NYC RUN B#5501 R1 JOC010474-1 LV62R1AD 9LV62R10
NYC RUN B#5501 R1 JOC010474-1 LV62R1AC 9LV62R10
NYC RUN B#5501 R1 JOC01 0474-1 LV62R2AA 9LV62R20
Batch No.
0061155
0061156
0077135
0061155
0061156
0077135
0061155
0061156
0077135
Certificate of Analysis
March 31, 2010
Denison Mines (USA) Corp
1050 17th Street, Suite 950
Denver, CO 80265
Attention: Dean Kitchen
Date Received at Lab
Project Name
Sample Type
SDGNumber
I. Introduction
March 1,2010
Denison Mines 4'" Qtr Blanding, Utah
Three (3) Stack Filter Samples
41040
CASE NARRATIVE
On March 1,20 I 0, three stack filter samples were received at TestAmerica's Richland laboratory for
radiochemical analysis. Upon receipt, the samples were assigned the TestAmerica identification numbers
as described on the covel' page of the Analytical Data Package report form. The samples were assigned to
Lot Numbers lOCOI 0474.
II. Sample Receipt
The samples were received in good condition and no anomalies were noted during check-in.
III. Analytical Results/Methodology
The analytical results for this repoli arc presented by laboratory sample !D. Each set of data includes
sample identification information; analytical results and the appropriate associated statistical
uncertainties.
The analysis requested was:
Alpha Spectroscopy
Thorium-228, -230, -232 by method RL-ALP-OO I (RICI-I-RC-5087)*
Gamma Spectroscopy
Pb-210 by method RL-GA-OOI (RICH-RC-5017)*
Alpha Scintillation
Radium-226 by method RL-RA-OOI (RICI-I-RC-5005)*
'" SOP ID'5 changed effective 7-01-2008. Attached is a cross reference until ID's are changed over in all systems.
TcstAmcrica Laboratories, Inc, 2
Denison Mines (USA) Corp
March 3 I , 20 I 0
IV. Quality Control
The analytical result for each analysis performed includes a minimum of one laboratory control sample
(LCS), and one reagent blank sample analysis. Any exceptions have been noted in the "Comments"
section.
V. Comments
Alpha Spectl'Oscopy
Thorium-228, 230, 232
Upon initial analysis, the tracer yields of the samples exceed the acceptance limits due to indigenous Th-
234 activity in the samples. The natural Uranium activity and daughter progeny overwhelmed the Th-234
tracer added to the samples. The samples were re-analyzed in batch II 0077135 using a Th-229 tracer.
Upon initial count, sample Baghouse, the blank and the LCS were unable to be calculated due to smeared
spectra. The samples were re-analyzed by stripping the disks, sending them back through the columns and
recounting. The recount is within acceptance limits. The achieved MDA of the samples exceeds the
detection limit. However, the sample activity of the samples, except the blank, exeeeds the MDA and
deteetion limit. The data is reported. Exeept as noted, the LCS, batch blank and sample results are within
acceptance limits.
Gamma Spectroscopy
Pb-210
The achieved MDA of the samples exceeds the detection limit. However, the sample activity of samples
NYC Run I, NYC Run 2 and the LCS exceeds the MDA and detection limit; Samples Baghouse and the
Blank did not. Data will be provided for elient review. Except as noted, the LCS, batch blank, sample
and sample duplicate results are within acceptance limits.
Alpha Scintillation
Radium-226
The achieved MONs exeeed the detection limit; the sample activity exceeds the DL, therefore the data
can be aecepted. The LCS, batch blank, sample and sample duplicate results are within acccptance limits.
I certifY that this Celtificate of Analysis is in compliance with the SOW andlor NELAC, both technically
and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. The Laboratory Manager or a
designee, as verified by the following signature has authorized release of the data contained in this hard
copy data package.
Reviewed and approved:
Erika Jordan
Customer Service Manager
TcstAmcrica Laboratories, Inc. 3
Isotope
A,b('SIOS
Asbl'SIOS
Alph'l_CroSS
Alpha _ Gross
Alpha -Gross
Alpha -Gross
Alpha -Gross
Am
Am
1)('1<1-Gross
I)CI~ _Gross
I3elil_Gross
CJ<
04
C14
C14
CI4
Cm
Coliform
Coliform
Coliform
Cr6+
06+
Fe
F('55
1'('59
Gillllm<l
H3
1-13
)-J3
J-!3
1-13
H3
Richland
501'#
RL-ASll-OOl
RL-ASB-002
ARCHIVED
RL-CPC-OOI
RL-GI'C-007
RL-GI'C-002
RL-GPC-008
RL-ALP-003
gL-AU'-010
RL-CPC-OOI
RL-GI'C-007
RL-GPC-008
RL-15C-DOI
RL-LSC-008
RL-LSC-009
RL-lSC-010
RL-LSC-Ol1
RL-I\LI'-003
RL-IVC-OOI
RL-WC-002
I<L-WC-005
RIAVC-003
RL-WC-(X}j
RL-L5(-015
RL-I.SC-016
I~L-LSC-016
I~L-GAI'I'I-OOI
RL-LSC-OOI
RI,-I.SC-003
I~L-LSC-004
RL-LSC-OOS
1\1.-15C-007
RL-LSC-002
Update 7/01/08
Old Hichland
50P#
NfA
NfA
RICII-RB-S035
RICH-RC-5014
RICII-RC-5020
1<ICH-RC-5021
RICl-J-RC-5036
Method Reference Title
NIOSH 7400 Fiber COlinttng by I'h,\S(' COnlr<lS1 MICroscopy bds('d on NIOSH 7400
NIOSH 9002 Sdmpl(' Prep and An~lysls for AsJwslos (bulk) by Polarized Llghl Microsopy basc'd 011 NIOSH 9002
1_l{lllld Snnlillallon Anill/
PilckMd DETERMINATION OF GROSS I\LPHA IN NASAl, SMEAl,S BY LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTING
9310/ EPA SVV846
900,0/ EPA 600 DETF.J<l'vIINATION OF GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BET A IN W Aft:!< BY METI10D 9310
SM 7110B
EI'A 680 DETERlvlINAl"lON OF CROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA IN SOil., SHORELINESOIL, FOOD AND VEGETArION
00·02 EPA 520 DETERMINATION OF GROSS ALPHA ACTIVITY IN WATER BY COI'I~EClJ>ITATION
ER100 / LANL j>1,EI'ARATION OF I\IR FILTERS FOI~ GROSS AIJ'HA/lJErA AND COMI'OSITINC AIR FILTEHS
Mod 1<1' 725 / DOE0089T EXT
RICH·I~C-5072 Chromaloljl"i1phy SEPARATION OF I\MERICIUM, CURIU1vI, AND UHANIWv] BY EXTI{ACrION CHRO,vIATOGI<AI'HY
Alll03/l'ull I lASL 300
1~ICI-1-RC-5080 NAS·NS-3006 SEQUENTIALSEI'AIV\TION OF I'LlHONIUM AND AI\·IEf<lCIUM
RICH-RC-SOI4
RICI-I-I~C-S020
RICH-I{C-5036
I~ICH-RB-SOI3
RIClI-RC5022
I\ICI-1-I<C-5040
I<ICI-I-I<C-5046
9310/ EPA SW846
900.0/ EPA 600
Sl'Ij 7110B
EPA 680
ERIOO / LANL
Mod H-02 / EPA 520
EPAC-Ol/EI'A520
Mod C14 / EPA 680
EI'AC-OI/EPi\5Z0
DETERMINA"rION OF GROSS Al.PHA ANJ)GROSS BETA IN WATER BY METHOD 9310
DETEl~tvjjNATION OF GROSS AU'I-IA AND GROSS BETA IN SOIL, SJ-IOREI.lNESOIL, FCX)D AN!) VECETATION
PREI'ARAT10N OF AIR FILTERS FOR GROSS ALPHA/BETA AND C:OMI'OSITINC AIR FILTERS
TRITIUM, CAI{BON-14, NICKEL-630R I'HOSI'IIORUS·32 ANAI.YSIS IN URINE
CARBON 14 BY DIGESTION METHOD
D"I'ERJ\·IINATIONOFCAI<BON-J4 BY BENZENESYNTI1ESIS
DETER1I.11NATION OFCARBON-14 IN GRAP! lITE AND SOIL
mGI-RC-5047 Mod 11-02 / EPA 520 DETERMINATION OF CAl<IlON-14 IN I-VATER BY DIRECrCOUNTING
Mod 1,1' 725 / ooE0089T EXT
1~ICH-RC-5072 Chromatogrilph)' sEPAI~ATION OF AMEI,ICIUM, CURIUM, AND UI<ANIUl\lllY EXTRACl"ION ClIROMATOGRAf'HY
HICH-WC-5001 922213 DETERMINATION OFTOTAI.COLlFOR~'I: MULTIPLE TUBE FERMENTATION TECHNIQUE
I<I(H-WC-5002 9131 TOTALCOUFORMS BY MEMBRANE FILTRATION
RICH-Ive-5007 9223 TOTAL COI..I FORM BY THE COULERT MElIlOD
I{ICI-q~'(>5003 7196A, SW846 OEI'ERMINATIONOF HEXAVALENTCHROMIUlvl ICr(VI)]IN WATER, SOIL, ANDSIMII.AR MATRICES
RIC! I-WC-5005 3060/51'1'846 J)ETERMINA"I"lON OF liEXAVAl.ENT CHI{OMIUM {CiVI} IN SOUD MATRICES WI"! II ALKALINE DIGESTION
EXT Chrom<llograph)'
RICII·RC-5074 1'I·lodF<.'55/I'Nl.-ALO·435 SEPARATION OF IRON AND NICKEL BY EXTRACTION CHl,OI\IATOGR,\I'HY
1~4-73-O14 / EPA
HICII-R(;.502-3 IIASL 300 DETEIUvlINA"J"lON OF IRON·55 AND II~ON-59IN WATEH
R4-73_014/ EPA
RIC11-RC-502..1 HASL300 DETERMINATION OF II\ON-55 AND IRON-59 IN WATER
901.0/ I-lASt 300
RICI-I-I(C-5017 ASTM 1)3649 PREI'AJ<ATION OF ALL MATJ<lCES pOR ANALYSIS BY CAMMA sJ'ECTROSCOPY
R1CH-RB-50l3 I'Ilod 1'1-02 / EPA 520 rRITIUM, CARBON-14, NICKEL-630R PI-l0SI'HOI~US-32 ANALYSIS IN URINE
RICH-RB·5034 7500·3/ SM DETEIIMINATION OF TRITIUlvllN URINE IlY DISTILLATION
RICH·RC-5004 1-13/ EPA LV539 DETERMINATION OF TRITIUM IN Am
Rlel-I-RC-5007 1\10d '906.0/ EPA (,00 SEPARATION OF "j"HITlU,\'1 IN IVATEI~ AND AQUEOUS COMPONI,NT OF I'VINE
l-H by EE EPA LV539/
RIClj-RC-5024 HASI.300 DE1H<MINA"rION OF LOW LEVEL TRITIUM IN IVATER BY ELECrROLYTIC ENRICHMENT
11-311\ W,ll('r /Tiss\!(> /
1~ICI-I-RC-5037 LV 539 DETERMINATION OF TRITtUl\l BY CRYOGENIC DISTILLATION
TcstAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 4
Isotope
113
1129
1131
1131
1I'1ewls
N'
Ni63
Np
Np
1'32
I'b
1'1'
'rep -[lioassay
'n.'p _ [llOilssay
I'rep _ Bioassay
'rep _ IlIO<1Ssa),
I'lep _ BIOil5SilY
'nejl _ llioassd),
Prep -COUllt
Pn'p _ COllnl
I'rep _COUll!
Prep _ Env
Prep _ Env
Prep _ Enl'
I'r('p_ Enl'
Prep _ [<(,Sill
Prep-Soil
Pn'p.Soil
nkhland
SOP #
RL-I$C-006
IU.-GAM-002
RL-GAM-002
ARCHIVED
ARCHIVED
RL-~lT-OOl
I,L-MT-002
RL-MT-003
RL-LSC-015
RIA.sc:·OOl
RL-I..SC-017
RL·AI,I'-013
RL-ALP-006
RL-JSC-001
I'L-AI..I'-011
RI,-ALI'-007
RL-t\IY-012
ARCHIVED
gIA'HI'-ool
ARCHIVED
RL-RPL-002
I~L-I'RP-002
RL-RI'L-003
RL ALI'-016
I~L AU'-015
RL AI.I'-014
RL·Kl'A-001
I<L-I'RI'-004
1\1.-1'1,1'-007
RL 1'1<.1'-008
RL ALP-017
l'I.-PRI'-003
1<1_-1'1<1'-005
Update 7/01/08
Old nkhland
SOP#
RICH-RC-5Q.18
RIClHK-5025
HICJ-I-RC-5025
RICH-RC-5049
BHI-MT-OOOI
RICH-MT-OOOI
RICII-MHlOO2
1\ICI1-MT-000.'
RIClI-RI3-5013
RICH-RC-5069
RICH-RC-5009
RICI~-IK-5064
J,ICH-RIl-5013
RICl-I-RC-5076
RICH-RB-5OOJ
1<:IOI-RC-5012
RICI~-RB-0001
RICI j·RB·5OO2
RICH-RlJ·5004
RICII-RB-5036
RICH-RI3·5037
RICII-RC-5028
RICH-RC-5003
1~ICII-RC-5039
RIClI-RC-5085
RICH-RC-5015
RICH-RC-5016
J,ICII-IK-5045
1~IClj-RC-5068
RICH-RC-501S
RICH-RC-5013
RICH-r,C-5019
'l'cstAmerica Laboratories~ Inc.
Method Reference Title
l-J-3 In W<Iler/Ti$sue /
LV 539 THJl"jUrvll'l<EI'Af~i\TION IN 1vl1LKSAMI'LES
R4-73-OJ4IjEI'A ASTM
D2334 (Discontinued) DETERMINATION OF IODINE-131 AND 129 IN WATER BY SOLVENT EXTRACTION METHOD
IN-73-0141/EI'A ASTM
D2334 (DlsColttlilued) DETEI<MINATION OF IODINE-131 AND 129 IN WIHER BY SOLVENT EXTRACTION METHOD
HASL 300 (l983) DEI"ERMINATION OF IODINE-131 IN JI.·IILK BY BATCH ION-EXCHANGE
6010 ICi'-AESPEGROSCOI'Y, SpECTRO:VlHTRIC METHOD FOR THACE ELEMENT ANALYSIS, METHOD 6010A FOR lhhtel
6010B ICI'-AES [or-mACE ELEMENT ANAI.YSIS, ",IEri IOD 601011
SW4863050n ACID D1GESTION FOR lCI' ANALYSIS
NI05117300 DIGE.STION I'gEP b,l,ed all METIIOD NIOSH 7300
EXT Chromator,r,lphy
ModFe55/PNL-ALO-435 SEPARATION OF IRON AND NICKEL BY EXTRACrJON C! IROMATOCRAI'HY
Mod H-02/ EPA 520 TRITIUM, CARBON-14, NJCKEL-63OR I'IIOSI'HORUS-32 ANALYSIS IN UIIINE
EXT Chroll1~togr~ph)'
Mod JW300 / DOE0089T SEI' AliA nON OF NI-63 BY EXTRACTION Cl-I ROMATOGHAI'HY
NAS-NS-3060 DETEJU.·lINATION OF NEJ'TUNIUM-237 BY LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRAcrION IN ALL MATRICES
EXTChromatogrilph)' SEPARATION OF Nm'TUNIUM BY EXTRACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY
Mod H-02/ EPA 520 Tl<.ITlUtvl, CARBON-14, NICKEl.-63OR I'HOSI'HORU5-32 ANALYSIS IN URINE
EXTChrol11<1lor,raphy DEnmMINA"l"ION OF LEAD-210 BY EXTRACnON CIIROJl.IATOGRAI'HY
NAS-NS-3037
HAS!. 300 DETERlvllNATJON OF POI.ONIUM-21O IN UF:INE
1'0-01/ liASL300
Mod UOI HASL 300 SEPARATION OF ISOTOPIC URANIUM AND l'OLONIU1>.1·210 IN WATER, SOil ANI) FIJ.:nms
PREPARATION FOR RAPID [JJOA55AY ANALYSE.S
Mod l'u06 / I1ASL.300 PREPARATION OF URINE AND BLOOD SAMpUiS
ASTM D1429_95 DETERMINATION OF SPECiFIC GRAVITY or URINE
Pub 6490,6601/ I'NI, I'REPARATION OF SYNTHETIC URINE AND FECES USING RECiPES FI~OM III'S N13.30 I'REFORMANCE rESTING
LA-10300-M H200
ASTM 1)3865 I'I~EI'ARATJON OF FECALSAJl.ll'I.E.S USING I IYDROFLUORIC ACID OIGESTlON
ICRI' l'ul>lic~tlOl\ 23 PREI)AI~ATtON or SYNTI IE1"!C URINE AND I:ECE5
C·03 / IiASI.300 COI'RECII'ITATION OF SOME ACTINIDES ON NEODYIIIIUM FLUORIDE FOl~ ALPHA_I'AI<:TICLESI'EcmOMETRY
<;-03/1IA5I.3oo
An,ll Chem 1972 ELECTRODEI'OSITION OF ACTINIDIi$
MOrrison & Fr(,lser
NAS-N5-3050 ANJIYDROUS ETHER EXTRACTION OF URANIUM
ASTM /1)5174-97 ENVIRONMENTALSAJl.1I'LE PREPARATION FOR URANIUM I3Y LASER-INDUCED PHOSI'HOI<K'iCENCE
Sr02 / HA5L300 PREI'ARATION OF ENVmONMENTAL MATRICES
Mod l'u02 / HASL300 PREPARATION OF MIXED BED RESINS AND I'RE-FII.TER5
Mod m<:l00 / LA10300 PREPARATION OF SOIL, VEGETATION AND AIR FILTERS BY lvllXEDSTRONG ACID LEACHING
Mod Pull/MOd 300 ION-EXCllANGE PREPARATION
Pu02A / HASL300 PREPARATION OF SOIL SAMPLES
1)5259/ ASTM
5W 846/3015/3051/3052 I'REI'A1,A"nON ANt) DISSOLUTION OFSEI)IMENTS AND SOIL BY IvllCROWAVE BOIvIB DIGf:STION
2
5
Isotope
Prep· Soil
Prcp-SOII
Prep-Urn\('
Prep -\'\'cll~r
1'"
1'"
p"
I'll
I~a
R"
535
$(>79
I" Solubllity
51'
51'
51·
5,
Sr-YI
1'<
T(
Th
Th
u
u
u
u
u
u
Richland
SOP#
RL-PRP-006
RL 1'1<:1'-009
RL 1'11.1'-010
I?L-PI/.P-OIO
ARClIIVED
RL·ALI'-OO2
RL-ALI'-OIO
I~L-ALP~ool
RL-RA·ool
RI<'"I~A-002
I\L-15C-019
Af~CI-lIVED
J<.L-L':lC-012
ARCHIVED
RL-GPC-005
RL-GI'C-006
ARCHIVED
ARCI1IVED
RL-GI'C-003
RL-GPC-004
RL-L,'>C-014
RL-LSC-013
R1--ALP-008
RL-ALl'-OO5
RL-ALP-012
RL-KPA-002
HL-KPA-003
RL-AI,P-00·1
RI_-AI-I'-003
RI,-AI-I'-OO9
Update 7/01/08
Old Richland
SOP#
RICl-I-RC-5032
Method Reference Title
Pu02A / HASt 300 COMPLETE DISSOLUTION Ill' lvllXED ACIDS IN A TEFLON BEAKEr?
RIClI-RC_5077 I\lod ERloo / LA10300 PREPARATION OF SMALLS01LSAlvlPJ.ES FOR GAMMA SPEC AND/OR RADIOCIIEM ANAl BY AelD DIGIiST10N
AllalY\lcaCiwmAcla 1992
I<.IOI-RC_5086 11.1'800 / I)OE00089T URINE AND WATER SAl\l!'I,E PREPARATION Ill' CALCIUM PHOSPHATE PRECIPITATION
A Ilalyl IcaCll('lnACla 1992
RICH-RC-5086 1<1'800/ DOEOootm URINE AND WAfER SAMPLE PREPARATION BY CALCIUM PHOSPHATE PRECIPITATION
RIClI-RB-5015 Pull/ HASL300 RAPID DETERMINATiON OF PI.UrONIUM IN FECES
[~IC[ I-I<'C-5010 Pull/ HA5L 300 DETERtv!lNArJON OF 150TOI'IC PLUTONIUt.lIN ALI MATIWTS
Am03I-1ASL300
RICI-1-RC-5080 Pull/HAS!. 300 SEQUENTIAL SEPARATION OF PI.UTONIUM AND AMERICIUM
An,llrllCaCiwmActal992
l<ICH-RC-5087 RP800 / I)OE00089T DEnmMINATION OF PLUTONIUM BY EXTRACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY
RICH-RC-5005 903.1/ EPA 6(}O RADIUM-226 AND RADIUhl-228 SEI'AI~ATION [N I<'ADJ(XHEMICAL MATRICES -ADAPTEr) FROM EPA 903.1 1\1\'D 904.0
HICH-RC-5005 90-1.0/ EPA 600 RADIUI\1-226 AND RADIUM-228SEI'ARATION IN RADIOCHEMICAl MATRIC!~S -ADAI'TED FROM EI'A 903.J AND 904.0
Mod D2460/ ASTM
1<'IUI-RC-5027 903.0/ EPA 600 DETERMINA"l"ION OF TOTAL RADIUM
RICI-J-RC-5082 913.0/ EPA DETERt.·lINATJON OF I<ADON-222 _ !\1)i\PTED FROM METHOD 913.0
HillC'brand, LunctlX'lI, Snelll,
R1CH-IUl-5020 Hoffman 1953 DEl"ERMINATION OF SULFUR-35IN URINE
1~ICH-RC-5043 Selelllum / NAS·NS-3030 RADIOCHEMICAL DETERMINATION OFSELENIUJv!-79
RICI-I-RC-5035 K~I{wilrct&Th(\Jl1i1$ I'NL3716 DETERMINATION OF SOLUBILITY OF RAJ)IOACl"IVE PARTJCLECONSTITUliNTS
I\.lod 51'02/ HASt 300 Ivlod
RIO 1.1<1,>-5007 905.0/ EPA 600 DErERMINATION OFTOTALSTRONTIUM IN URINE
Mod Sr02/ H:\SL300 1\10d
RIC11-RB-5021 905_0/ EPA 600 DETERMINATION OF 5mONTIUM IN FEO,,'>
Mod Sr02/I-lASL100 Mod
RICH-RB-5022 905.0/ EPA 600 DETlmMINATION OF TOTAL-STRONTIUM IN URINE FOR RAPID ANALYSIS
Mod Sr02/ 1-IA5L300 Mod
RICH-I~B-5031 905.0/ EPA 600 RAPID !)ETERMINATION OF TOTAL STRONTIUM IN FECES
Mod SI02/IIASLJOO Mo(i
RICH-RC-5006 905.0/ EPA 600 STRONTIUlvl SEPARATION IN ENVIHOMENTAL MATRICES
Mod ST02/ HASLJOO ~'Ioct
RICI-I-I\C-5071 905.0/ EPA 600 YTrRIUM-90SEPARATION FOJ<. smONTIUM-90 DETERMINATION IN ALL MATRICES
EXT Chl"Onl<llograph)' Mod
RICH-RC-5065 RP550/ 00E0089T DETERM1NA"rJON OF TECllNEnU~I-99I3Y EXTRACTION ClIROM,\T<X;RAPHY
RICH-RC-5078 TcOI / HASL300 SEPARATION OF rECI1NETIUM-99IN ALL MATRICES
RICII-RI3-5006 Mod ThOl/I-IASL300 SEPARATION OF rHOHIUlvl FROM UI~INE AND FECAI,SAMI'I.ES
I\lod ThO] / HASt 300 Andl
R1CH-RC-50M (him A(I<11982 DETERhllNATION OF THORIUM ISOTOPIC IN ENVIRONJ\'JENTAl.lvIATRICE.':l
Po-OJ / HASL300
RICH-II.(-5012 l\'lod UOI / H:\S1.300 SEPARATION OF ISOTOPIC URANIU:'i AN!) POLONIUl\·1-210 IN WATER, SOIL ,\NI) FILTERS
1\ICH-RC-5031 I\lod UOI/ HASL300 SEI'AI~ATION OF TOTAL URANIUtvllN \,VATER AND URINE
RICI-I-I<C-5058 ])5174/ A5H.1 DETER1>.IINATION OF URANIUM BY PllOSI'HORESCENCE ANALYSIS
EXT Chrom.llogr,lphy I\10d
RIOI-1\C-5067 RP725/ DOE0089T SEPARA'I"10N OF UI<.ANIUM BY EXmACTlON CHROMATOCRAPHY
EXT Chrom Mod 1<1'725 & 800
RIC1-f-RC-5072 /IX)EOO89T SEI'AI~ATION OF AMERICIUM, CURIUM, AND URAN1UtI-! BY EXTHACTJON CHROMATOGRAl'11Y
EXTChroma(ography Mod
RICH-RC-S079 RI'725/ DOE0089T DETER1\·lINATION OF ISOTOPIC URANIUM IN ALL MATIIICES
3
TcstAmerica Laboratories) Inc. 6
Drinking Water Method Cross References
DRINKING WATER ASTM METHOD CROSS REFERENCES I
I
Referenced Method lsotope(s) TestAmerica Richland's SOP N
EPA 901.1 CS-134, 1-131 RL-GAM-001
EPA 900.0 Alpha & Beta RL-GPC-001
EPA 00-02 Gross Alpha (Coprecipitation) RL-GPC-002
EPA 903.0 Total Alpha Radium (Ra-226) RL-RA-002
EPA 903.1 Ra-226 RL-RA-001
EPA 904.0 Ra-228 RL-RA-001
EPA 905.0 Sr-89/90 RL-GPC-003
ASTM D5174 Uranium RL-KPA-003
EPA 906.0 Tritium RL-LSC-005
Results in this report relate only to the sample(s) analyzed.
Uncertainty Estimation
TcstAmerica Richland has adopted the internationally accepted approach to estimating
uncertainties described in "NIST Technical Note 1297, 1994 Edition", The approach~ "Law of Propagation
of Errorsll, involves the identification of all variables in an analytical method \vhich are used to derive a
result. These variables arc related to the analytical result (R) by some functional relationship, R = constants
* f(x,y,z, ... ). The components (x,y,z) arc evaluated to determine their contribution to the overall method
uncertainty. The individual component uncertainties (ul) arc then combined using a statistical model that
provides the most probable overall uncertainty value. All component uncertainties are categorized as type
A, evaluated by statistical methods, or type B, evaluated by other means: Uncertainties n01 included in the
components, such as samplc homogeneity, are combined with the component uncertainty as the square root
of the SUI11-o{-the-squares of the individual uncertainties. The uncertainty associated with the derived result
is the combined uncertainty (ue) multiplied by the coverage factor (1), or 3).
When three or more sample replicates arc used to derive the analytical result, the type A
uncertainty is the standard deviation of the mean value (S/?n), where S is the standard deviation of the
derived results. The type 13 uncertainties arc all other random or non-random components that are not
included in the standard deviation.
The derivation orihe genera! IILaw of Propagation of Errors" equations and specific example arc
available on request.
TestAmerlca
l"J)tGcllcralInfo v3.72
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 7
o.
Action Le,'
Batch
Bias
COCNo
Count Error (#s)
Totalllncel·t (#s)
uc_Combilled
Uncertain(p.
(#s), Covcl'age
i Factor
CRDL(RL)
Lc
I Lot~Sample No
MDqMDA
Primary Dcteetor
Ratio U-234/l1-238
Rst/MDC
RstrrotUccl't
I~cport DB No
i fUm
SDG
Sum Rpt Alpha
Spec Rst(s)
Yield
TestAmerica
. .._..............._ ....... __ .. B~portPefinitioll_l;._ ............... ~___ .......... _. __ ..... ._____
An agreed upon activity level used to triggcr some action whcn the final result is greater tban OJ' equal to tbe Action
Level. Often the Action Level is related to the Decision Limit.
The QC preparation batch number that relates laboratory samples to QC samples tbat were prepared and analyzed
together.
Defined by the equation (ResuIt/Expccted)~ I as defined by ANSI N J 3.30.
Chain of Custody Number assigned by the Client or TcstAmerica.
Poisson counting statistics of the gross sample count and background. The unceltainty is absolute and in the same
units as the result. For Liquid Scintillation Counting (LSC) the batch blank count is the background.
AI! known uncertain tics associated with the preparation and analysis of the sample are propagated to give a measure
of the uncertainty associated with the result, lie the combined uncertainty. The unccrtainty is absolute and in the
same units as the resule
The coverage factor defines the width of the confidence interval, 1,2 or 3 st,mdard deviations.
Contractual Required Detection Limit as defined in the Client's Statement Of Work or TestAmerica "default"
nominal detection limit. Often referred to the reporting level (RL)
Decision Level based on instrument background or blank, adjusted by the Efficiency, Chemical Yield, and Volumc
associated with the sample. The Type I error probability is approximately 5%. Lc=( 1.645 *
Sqrt(2*(BkgmdCnI/BkgmdCntMin)/SCntMin)) * (ConvFct/(Ef0'Yld*Abn*Vol) * IngrFct). For LSC methods the
batch blank is used as a measure of the background variability. Lc cannot be calculated when the background count
is zero.
The number assigned by the LlMS software to track samples received on the same day for a given client. The
sample number is a sequential number assigned to each sample in the Lot.
Detection Level bascd 011 instrument background or blank, adjusted by the Efficiency, Chemical Yield, and Volume
with a Type I and II error probability of' approximately 5%. MDe = (4.65 *'
Sqrt«BkgrndCntlBkgrndCntMin)/SCntMin) + 2.7I1SCntMin) * (ConvFctl(Eff * Yld * Abn '" Vol) '" IngrFet). For
LSC methods the batch blank is used as a measure orthe background variability.
The instrument identifier associated with the analysis of tile sample aliquot.
The U~234 result dividcd by the U~238 result. The U~234/tJ~238 ratio for natural uranium in NIST SRM 432lC is
1.038.
Ratio of the Result to the MDC. A value greater than I may indicate activity above background at a high level of
confidence. Caution should be used when applying this HlCtor and it should be used in concert with the qualifiers
associated with the result.
Ratio of the Result to the Total Uncertainty. If the uncertainty has a coverage factor of2 a value greater than I may
indicate activity above background at approximatcly the 95% level of confidence assuming a two~sided confidence
interval. Caution should be used when applying this factor and it should be used in concert with the qualifiers
associated with the result.
Sample Identifier used by the repmt system. The number is based upon the first five digits of the WOdi Ol'dcl'
Number.
The equation Replicate Error Ratio "" (S~D)/fsqlt(TPUs2 + TPUd2)] as defined by ICPT BOA where S is the original
sample result, D is the result of the duplicate, TPUs is the total ullceltainty of tile original sample and TPUd is the
total uncertainty oCthe duplicate sample.
Sample Delivery Group Number assigned by the Client or assigned by TestAmerica upon sample receipt.
The sum of the reported alpha spec results for tests derived from the same sample excluding duplicate result where
the results are in the same units.
The LIMS software assign test specific identifier.
The recovery oftlIe tracer added to the sample such as Pu~242 used to trace a Pu~239/40 method.
rptGcllcralInfo v3.72
TestAmcrica Laboratories, Inc. 8
Sample Results Summary Date: 16-Apr-10
TestAmerica
Ordered by Method, Batch No., Client Sample 10.
Report No. : 43578 SDG No: 41040
Client Id Tracer Moe or
Batch Work Order Parameter Result +M Uncertainty ( 2s) Qual Units Yield MDA CRDL RER2
0077135 RICHRC5011
BAGHOUSE B# 5502 BH
LV62V3AA TH-228 7.75E-07 +-5.0E-07 UCI/SA 24% 4.75E-07
TH-230 4.75E-05 +-9.5E-06 UCI/SA 24% 4.29E-07 3.00E-15
TH-232 1.28E-06 +-6.1E-07 UCI/SA 24% 4.29E-07
NYC RUN 2 B# 5482 R2
LV62T2AA TH-228 9.11E-06 +-1.7E-06 UCI/SA 106% 1.17E-07
TH-230 2.03E-04 +-3.3E-05 UCI/SA 106% 1.06E-07 3.00E-15
TH-232 1.01 E-05 +-1.8E-06 UCI/SA 106% 1.06E-07
NYC RUN B#5501 R1
LV62R2AA TH-228 3.80E-06 +-7.8E-07 UCI/SA 95% 1.16E-07
TH-230 8.68E-05 +-1.4E-05 UCI/SA 95% 1.05E-07 3.00E-15
TH-232 4.05E-06 +-8.1 E-07 UCI/SA 95% 1.05E-07
0061155 RICHRC5011
BAGHOUSE B# 5502 BH
LV62V1AD Pb-210 3.30E-06 +-3.0E-06 U UCI/SA 100% 5.56E-06 6.00E-14
NYC RUN 2 B# 5482 R2
LV62T1AD Pb-210 1.43E-05 +-7.6E-06 UCI/SA 55% 1.28E-05 6.00E-14
NYC RUN B#5501 R1
LV62R1AD Pb-210 1.53E-05 +-5.8E-06 UCI/SA 75% 8.29E-06 6.00E-14
0061156 RL-RA-001
BAG HOUSE B# 5502 BH
LV62V1AC RA-226 1.04E-06 +-6.5E-07 100% 7.99E-07 9.00E-14
NYC RUN 2 B# 5482 R2
LV62T1AC RA-226 1.63E-06 +-7.4E-07 100% 8.12E-07 9.00E-14
NYC RUN B#5501 R1
LV62R1AC RA-226 1.40E-08 +-3.9E-07 U 100% 7.82E-07 9.00E-14
No, of Results: 15
TestAmerica RER2 ~ Replicate Enol' H.alio = (S-D)/[sql't(sq(TPlJs)+sq(TPtJd))l as defined by lePT BOA.
rptSTLRchSaSum
mary2 VS.2.5
A2002
II Qual -Analyzed for but lIot detected above limiting criteria. Limit criteria is less than the Mdc/Mda 01' Totalt]nCCI'( or not identified by
gamma scan software.
TcstAmcrica Laboratories, Inc. 9
QC Results Summary Date: 16-Apr-10
TestAmerica
Ordered by Method, Batch No, QC Type,.
Report No. : 43578 SDG No.: 41040
Batch Tracer LCS
Work Order Parameter Result +~ Uncertainty ( 2s) Qual Units Yield Recovery Bias MDClMDA
RICHRCSOii
0077135 BLANK ac,
LWR922AA TH·228 7.S0E-09 +-2.1E-08 U UCIISA 20% S.S2E-08
TH-230 6.76E-09 +-2.3E-08 U UCI/SA 20% 4.97E-08
TH-232 O.OOE+OO +-1.9E-08 U UCI/SA 20% 4.97E-OS
0077135 LCS,
LWR922AC, TH-230 1.77E-06 +-4.0E-07 J UCI/SA 21% 96% 0.0 4.S7E-OS
RICHRCS01i
0061155 BLANK ac,
LV7C61M Pb-210 3.6SE-07 +-3.0E-07 U UCI/SA 100% SA6E-07
0061155 LCS,
LV7C61AC Pb-210 1.11 E-OS +-2.9E-06 UCI/SA 100% 121% 0.2 S.6SE-07
RL-RA-OOi
0061156 BLANK ac,
LV7DK1AA RA-226 i.66E-OS +-3.9E-08 U 100% 7.22E-OS
0061156 LCS,
LV7DK1AC RA-226 1.S6E-06 +-3.SE-07 J 100% 112% 0.1 6.03E-OS
No. of Results: 8
Ilias -(RcsuU/Expcctcd)-1 as defined by ANSI NI3.30. TestAmerica
rptSTLRchQcSum
mary VS.2.S A2002
J Qual -No UI< qualifier has beell assigned and the result is below the Reporting Limit, I~L (CRDL) or Report Value is Estimated.
lJ Qual -Analyzed for but not dctccted above limiting critcria. Limit criteria is less than the Mdc/Mda or Total Vncert or not identified by
gamma scan software.
TcstAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 10
FORM I Date: 16-Apr-10
SAMPLE RESULTS
Lab Name: TestAmerica SDG: 41040 Collection Date: 12/15/2009 10:00:00 AM
Lot-Sample No.: JOC010474-3 Report No.: 43578 Received Date: 3/1/20104:30:00 PM
Client Sample 10: BAG HOUSE B# 5502 BH CDC No.: Matrix: FILTER
DENISON MINES 4th QTR -BLANDING, UT Ordered b~ Client Sample 10, Batch No.
Result Count Total MDCIMDA, Rpt Unit, Yield RstlMDC, Analysis, Total Sa Aliquot Primary
Parameter Qual Error ( 25) Uncert( 2 s} Action lev Lc CRDL(RL} RstITotUcert Prep Date Size Size Detector
Batch: 0061155 RICHRC5011 Work Order: LV62V1AD Report DB 10: 9LV62V10
Pb-21 0 3.30E-06 U 2.9E-06 3.0E-06 5.56E-06 UCI/SA 100% 0.59 3/24/10 09:33 a 1.0 0.10113 GPC31D
2.68E-06 6.00E-14 (2.2) Sample Sample
Batch: 0061156 RL-RA-001 Work Order: LV62V1AC Report DB 10: 9LV62V10
RA-226 1.04E-06 6.2E-07 6.SE-07 7.99E-07 100% (1.3) 3/25/10 04: 17 p 1.0 0.1003 ASCMAD
3.22E-07 9.00E-14 (3.2) Sample Sample
Batch: 0077135 RICHRC5011 Work Order: LV62V3AA Report DB 10: 9LV62V30
TH-228 7.7SE-07 4.8E-07 5.0E-07 4.75E-07 UCI/SA 24% (1.6) 3/30/10 03:30 a 1.0 0.0987 ALP23
1.S0E-07 (3.1) Sample Sample
TH-230 4.7SE-OS 3.3E-06 9.5E-06 4.29E-07 UCI/SA 24% (110.9) 3/3011 0 03:30 a 1.0 0.0987 ALP23
1.3SE-07 3.00E-1S (10.) Sample Sample
TH-232 1.28E-06 5.6E-07 6.1 E-07 4.29E-07 UCIISA 24% (3) 3/30/10 03:30 a 1.0 0.0987 ALP23
1.35E-07 (4.2) Sample Sample
No. of Results: 5 Comments:
TestAmerica MDCIMDA,lc -Detection, Decision Level based on instrument background or blank, adjusted by the sample Efficiency, Yield, and Volume.
rptSTLRchSample J Qual -No Uj< qualifier has been assigned and the result is below the Reporting Limit, RL (CROL) or Report Value is Estimated.
VS.2.S A2002 U Qual -Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. Limit criteria is less than the MdC/Mda or Total Uncert or not identified by gamma scan software.
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 11
FORM I Date: 16-Apr-10
SAMPLE RESULTS
Lab Name: TestAmerica SDG: 41040 Collection Date: 12116120098:00:00 AM
Lot-Sample No.: JOC01 0474-2 Report No.: 43578 Received Date: 311120104:30:00 PM
Client Sample 10: NYC RUN 2 B# 5482 R2 CDC No.: Matrix: FILTER
DENISON MINES 4th QTR -BLANDING, UT Ordered b~ Client Sample 10, Batch No.
Result Count Total MDCjMDA, Rpt Unit, Yield RstlMDC, Analysis, Total Sa Aliquot Primary
Parameter Qual Error ( 2 s) Uncert( 2 s) Action Lev Lc CRDL(RL) Rst/Totucert Prep Date Size Size Detector
Batch: 0061155 RICHRC5011 Work Order: LV62T1AD Report DB 10: 9LV62T10
Pb-210 1,43E-05 7.0E-06 7.6E-06 1.2SE-05 UCI/SA 55% (1.1) 3/24/10 09:33 a 1.0 0.10011 GPC31C
6.17E-06 6.00E-14 (3.7) Sample Sample
Batch: 0061156 RL-RA-001 Work Order: LV62T1AC Report DB ID: 9LV62T10
RA-226 1.63E-06 6.7E-07 7,4E-07 S.12E-07 100% (2) 3/25/1004:14 p 1.0 0.0998 ASCLMC
3A7E-07 9.00E-14 (4.4) Sample Sample
Batch: 0077135 RICHRC5011 Work Order: LV62T2AA Report DB ID: 9LV62T20
TH-228 9.11E-06 7.6E-07 1.7E-06 1.17E-07 UCIISA 106% (7B.I) 3/24/10 02:59 p 1.0 0.09881 ALP22
3.6BE-OS (10.9) Sample Sample
TH-230 2.03E-04 3AE-06 3.3E-05 1.06E-07 UCI/SA 106% (1915.6) 3/24/1002:59 p 1.0 0.09881 ALP22
3.34E-OS 3.00E-15 (12.1) Sample Sample
TH-232 1.01E-05 7.6E-07 HE-06 1.06E-07 UCI/SA 106% (95.2) 3/24/1002:59 p 1.0 0.09881 ALP22
3.34E-08 (11.1) Sample Sample
No. of Results: 5 Comments:
TestAmerica MDCIMDA,lc -Detection, Decision Level based on instrument background or blank, adjusted by the sample Efficiency, Yield, and Volume.
rptSTlRchSample J Qual -No U!< qualifier has been assigned and the result is below the Reporting limit, RL (CROL) or Report Value is Estimated.
VS.2.5 A2D02 U Qual -Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. Limit criteria is less than the Mdc/Mda or Total Uncert or not identified by gamma scan software.
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 12
FORM I Date: 16-Apr-10
SAMPLE RESULTS
Lab Name: TestAmerica SDG: 41040 Collection Date: 12/15/20098:00:00 AM
Lot-Sample No.: JOC010474-1 Report No.: 43578 Received Date: 3/1/20104:30:00 PM
Client Sample 10: NYC RUN 8#5501 R1 COC No.: Matrix: FILTER
DENISON MINES 4th QTR -BLANDING, UT Ordered b~ Client Sample ID, Batch No.
Result Count Total MDClMDA, Rpt Unit, Yield RstIMDC, Analysis, Total Sa Aliquot Primary
Parameter Qual Error ( 2S) Uncert( 2 $) Action Lev Lc CRDL{RL) RstfTotUcert Prep Date Size Size Detector
Batch: 0061155 RICHRC5011 Work Order: LV62R1AD Report DB 10: 9LV62R10
Pb-210 1.S3E-OS 4.9E-06 5.SE-06 S.29E-06 UCIISA 75% (1.8) 3124110 09:33 a 1.0 0.10045 GPC31B
3.99E-06 6.00E-14 (5.3) Sample Sample
Batch: 0061156 RL·RA·OO1 Work Order: LV62R1AC Report DB 10: 9LV62R10
RA-226 1 AOE-OB U 3.9E-07 3.9E-07 7.S2E-07 100% 0.02 3125110 04:0S p 1.0 0.10008 ASCKME
3.34E-07 9.00E-14 0.07 Sample Sample
Batch: 0077135 RICHRC5011 Work Order: LV62R2AA Report DB 10; 9LV62R20
TH-228 3.BOE-OS 4.9E-07 ?BE-07 1.1SE-07 UCIISA 95% (32.7) 312411002:59 p 1.0 0.09897 ALP21
3.66E-OS (9.7) Sample Sample
TH-230 B.6BE-OS 2.2E-06 1.4E-05 1.05E-07 UCIISA 95% (S26.2) 3124110 02:59 p 1.0 0.09897 ALP21
3.32E-OS 3.00E-15 (12.4) Sample Sample
TH-232 4.0SE-OS 4.BE-07 B.1 E-07 1.05E-07 UCIISA 95% (38.6) 3124110 02:59 p 1.0 0.09897 ALP21
3.32E-OS (10.1) Sample Sample
No. of Results: 5 Comments:
TestAmerica MDCIMDA,Lc M Detection, Decision Level based on instrument background or blank, adjusted by the sample Efficiency, Yield, and Volume.
rptSTLRchSample J Qual. No UI< qualifier has been assigned and the result is below the Reporting Limit, RL (CRDL) or Report Value is Estimated.
VS.2.S A2002 U Qual ~ Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. Limit criteria is less than the Mdc/Mda or Total Uncert or not identified by gamma scan software.
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 13
FORM II Date: 16-Apr-10
BLANK RESULTS
Lab Name: TestAmerica SDG: 41040
Matrix: FILTER Report No.: 43578
Count Total MDCjMDA, Rpt Unit, RstlMDC, Analysis, Total Sa Aliquot Primary
Parameter Result Qual Error ( 2 s) Uncert( 25) Lc CRDL Yield RstITotUcert Prep Date Size Size Detector
Batch: 0061155 RICHRC5011 Work Order. LV7C61AA Report DB 10: LV7C61AB
Pb-210 3.65E-07 U 2.9E-07 3.0E-07 5.46E-07 UCIISA 100% 0.67 3/24/10 09:33 a 1.0 1.0 GPC32A
2.63E-07 6.00E-14 (2.4) Sample Sample
Batch: 0061156 RL-RA-001 Work Order: LV7DK1AA Report DB 10: LV7DK1AB
RA-226 1.66E-08 U 3.9E-08 3.9E-08 7.22E-08 100% 0.23 3/25/10 04: 15 p 1.0 1.0 ASCNMD
3.05E-08 9.00E-14 0.84 Sample Sample
Batch: 0077135 RICHRC5011 Work Order: LWR922AA Report DB 10: LWR922AB
TH-228 7.50E-09 U 2.1E-08 2.1 E-08 5.52E-08 UCIISA 20% 0.14 3/30/10 03:30 a 1.0 1.0 ALP21
1.74E-08 0.71 Sample Sample
TH-230 6.76E-09 U 2.3E-08 2.3E-08 4.97E-08 UCI/SA 20% 0.14 3/3011003:30 a 1.0 1.0 ALP21
1.57E-08 1.00E+OO 0.58 Sample Sample
TH-232 O.OOE+OO U O.OE+OO 1.9E-08 4.97E-08 UCI/SA 20% O. 3/30/1003:30 a 1.0 1.0 ALP21
1.57E-08 O. Sample Sample
.._---
No. of Results: 5 Comments:
TestAmerica MDCIMDA,Lc -Detection, Decision Level based on instrument background or blank, adjusted by the sample Efficiency, Yield, and Volume.
rptSTLRchBlank U Qual-Analyzed for but not detected above limiting criteria. Limit criteria is less than the .\1dc/l\1da or Total Uncert or not identified by gamma scan software.
V5.2.5 A2D02
TestAmcrica Laboratorics, Inc. 14
Lab Name: TestAmerica
Matrix: FILTER
Count
Parameter Result Qual Error ( 2s)
Batch: 0061155 RICHRC5011
Pb·210 1.11E-OS 6.4E-07
Batch: 0061156 RL-RA·OO1
RA·226 1.56E-06 1.6E-07
Batch: 0077135 RICHRC5011
TH-230 1.77E-06 2.2E-07
No. of Results: 3 Comments:
FORM II
Les RESULTS
Total Report Expected
Uncert( 2 s) MDClMDA Unit Yield Expected encert
Work Order: LV7C61AC Report DB 10: LV7C61CS
2.9E-06 S.68E-07 UCI/SA 100% 9.17E-06 4.62E-07
Rec Limits: 20 115
Work Order: LV7DK1AC Report DB 10: LV7DK1 CS
3.5E-07 6.03E-OS 100% 1.39E-06 1.59E-OS
Rec Limits: 70 130
Work Order: LWR922AC Report DB ID: LWR922CS
4.0E-07 4.S7E-OS UCI/SA 21% 1.S4E-06 3.74E-OS
Rec Limits: 70 130
TestAmerica Bias M (ResultlExpected)-l as defined by ANSI NI3.30.
rptSTLRchlcs
VS.2.S A2002
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. 15
Date: 16-Apr-10
SDG: 41040
Report No. : 43578
Recovery, Analysis, Aliquot Primary
Bias Prep Date Size Detector
121% 3/2411009:33 a 1.0 GPC32B
0.2 Sample
112% 3/2511 0 04:06 p 1.0 ASCPMA
0.1 Sample
96% 3/30/10 03:30 a 1.0 ALP22
0.0 Sample
~ ,,.
~ ~ ....., > > ~ (1) ~ w t; .-.. -. > g B
b 3.
0" " o po ~ l' c po
::::. cr' ~ 0 .Y' ~ _1"
" 0 p :=1. " w
" "
"'00
Chain of
Custody Record
Temperature on Receipt __ _ TestAmerica
TAL-412:4(1007) ~~-L lIA .. h''b2-~_S: DrinkingWater? YesO °NoO THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
aremT-ckQ U IPrnje"ManU~G."1 /C..kL~",
. Addre,. 'f C ; ro 2-D C' I C, I T~ Numbe, <",ea Code)tFii Numboc '3 '7 1'::-3:5 J"-r yC I t.f'l z. C'J 10 (,
CJl;: N1, <' L 1 Stalfl Zip Code . I SHe eo_ Iff' Je,,~...... f-,J,!,--Lr)-I 'If'!.. d ::;
uwCont=
Proje~. me ~mt Location .. (State.' ) ------;;;-8/.q"1J.),." 1 eaniedWaybll1 Number Ue..,t.",_!4A.V!"-" 'f ~ ,,J.. "I
ContiacVPurcflase Otdl3r/Quole No.
Date
lz 01
. F. t!"<'"5 "~fW .. ...I &~""'_
[
IV ~ Q;"" Z; 61i" S<.{S"'Z--12.2-" Fi7t,r41
'" t;:s sql't' 6" L r~ sY'i"~ 4 ... Jil ~
[
B~5Lo"5e (.1 .. « 5502-Gtt" I n/w/""I
p. \, ..... 6".'" ",~A e",,~
Matrix Containers &
Pn3S6l1l81ives
Tuoo Ir A-~ I <zl ~ I~~!
'3"& 1)\ ~W(d~ rr
16 OIQ. 1;< L\1 Chr 1 \ V
~l :;[
I
.J I ,
'/, )' ,
f-/'.
1-. /
++-H-t--+-r-1111111111111111111111111111111
M++-H-+-+--t-JO(;01 0474
Dat;~~
LabNumb9r
Analysis (Attach list If
mO~~e?:_~~fl!.!:6doo)
t-'c II -; ~
:
I f/ ~ < '"
;I If: --t. ~ =
·~~=Y'DI r TTl I I I I I I I I I I I DOJI-~';~~
ChainOf~_ 1~724
Page of
SpeckUlns~ucUonSf
Conditions of Receipt
fBt62317
~/7'\J I
&iifijWfj
IY IP~ 1ft1/0
Passfbfe Hazani fOOnlification -VlO) """""' =Dispasaf (A fee may be 8S$$SS6d ff samples are ret8fned aQ Non-Hazard 0 FI:Jmmabfe 0 Skin Irrirwlt 0 Poison B . 0 Unknown 0 R£JtlJm To Client 3l DJspo$sI By Lab 0 ArcI7fVe For ___ Montht; longer than 1 nwnth)
TurnAround TIme Required -1i5 J'r-r ac Requiliiinents (8pscifyl o 24f1oum O~"""" 0 70.ys 0 HDays 021 Days [iJ-vu,,, ""~'r'<.J I -_ /7 ---r14-?'..-#
1. R8!itlquisflad
2, Relinquished ~
3. Relinquished By ".. Date lIme -3. Recetved By DM • 1Ime
Co~ 0 "\ Co V" pt.-J-e-E",~l De~~ OV p-.,~f .f~~o ~ie+':o-U}. C".-,.
DISTRlButicifF--wFiITE ~-RotiJmeifto Ctlent vfith Repon; CANARY· Slays wilh the S8mp1ti,-PINf(~-FliiJd-----cGjiy
TestAmerica e . .
THElEAOER IN ENVIRONMENTAL T~ST!NG
I ~ (kyv\. .' Sample Check·1n List
Date!l'ime Received: 12:4--'309 . GM Screen Resul~:(out) . ,t( . (in),--,-,..:c("f-· _Jnili~~ Client:~ : SDG#:. ~c/ONA [J . SAF#:' ___ 4
Work Order Numbcr: -::rpCQ/()<;t,¥ainOfCustod~# ~/A-~.
Shipping ContliinerlD: i ~ Bill # -------"-------48
Item 1 through 5 'for shipping!contamcr 0n1y. l!lilli!l appropriatnesponse.
I.
2.
Custody Seals onsh~ping cont$er Intact?
Custody Seals dated iand !;ignedr? .
Chain of Custody re~ord present?
Yes ( No[
Yes ( J No (
~NO[
No CUstody se~
No CUstody se~~
l.
4. Cooler temperarure: . N~ 5.Verroiculite/packing materials is NA [ J Wet [ )D~
Item 6 through 10 for samples .. fuili.!!l a~propri~te response.
6. Number'ofsainples i.h shipping container (Each sample may contau, multiple bottles):--'("'5.d. __ -:--__
JNe~ 7.
8.
9.
Sample holding times exceeded? .
JJ':)Ples have:
~~tape
'NA[ 1 Yes (
__ custody seals ~hazard labels
. , e--appropriate sample.lebels
~~sare: :.v. good condltibn
__ broken ~/~ ,
__ leaking
" have air bubbles'
(Only for samples requiring head space)
10. Sample pH taken? NA-&H<2 [ J pH>2 [ J pH>9 [ . J Amount ofHN03 Added, __ ~_';
II. Sample Location, Sample Colleotor Listed?' .
*For documentation only, No correct~ye action needed.
12. Were allY anomalies identified in sample receipt?
13. Description of anomalies (Include sample numbers): NA [ ),_-'-_____________ ~-....
ide for additional comments
Sample Custodinr(.~~~4'f..s.~~~:':f::E:.· "£.< ___ Date: . ~, ,..::1 de)
Clien( Informed on' ___ ~ __ "U)'::...... ___ _'_ __ Person contacted, _________ _
M'NO aetion nece~r:r Rfooess .. h . I'
. ProJect Manager eM ~ ~
LS.023, Rev . .lO, 10/09 .
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TcstAmcrica Laboratories, Inc.
19
17
APPENDIXD
North Yellow Cake Scrubber
Figure 1. Facility Schematic Representation
Yellow Cake Dryer Baghouse
Figure 2. Facility Schematic Representation
Process Data
(Retained by Denison Mines)
D
Facilitv Denison Mines
-'--~=----.---:~=----:;~----=:;---::-:;---------
t
a
~
y
StackJdentification North Yellow Cake Scrubber
I+--0 -+ I
i 1
o
I
ex: Distance upstream from next disturbance, feet 7
~: Distance dOvvl1stream from last disturbance, feet
y: Distance of Sample Level to Ground, feet u
0: Stack Inside Diameter. inches 1
Estimated Moisture, percent
Estimated Temperature, of 1 vv·
Estimated Velocity, fpm _''-'':,,:',",",-_
Control Unit
Type:
Scrubber
Number of Ports
Figure L Facility Schematic Representation
process
Type:
Yellow Cake Processing
Facility Denison Mines
t
a
~
y
Stack Identification: Baghouse
[
1+-0-+1
a: Distance upstream from next disturbance, inches 57"
Distance downstream from last disturbance, inches 454"
y: Distance of Sample Level to Ground, feet 65'
0: Stack Inside Diameter, inches 16"
Estimated Moisture, percent 0-2%
Estimated Temperature, of 125
0
Estimated Velocity, fpm 1,400
Number of Ports 2
---~
Control L'nit
Type:
"'"
Baghouse
Figure 2. Facility Schematic Representation
Process
Type:
Yellow Cake Processing
Denison Mine Process Data
Source: North Yellow Cakc I Date: !? /Ir/v ')
Scrubber Flow GPM
Time #1 #2 II!'
'g'o 2 «t '. 1!1 (s-: 1-3· u
'/5:;'0 y,/ IS", S-3.6
<7.'00 g-. 3 1.5-. ;, 2·"]
q;;; 0
I": 0 0 ?, 5· cJ s}.vl.. --.-
lJ rf If: tt 1.,
/u.'')6
1/: 0 0 ~.4 It;'· « ~.o
/(.' :3 6 <,:·r (~'r-1..~
12-! " <> ~. ~ t$'.;;r l·Y-
/2 ,"5D «.~ I 50 ~ 2·0( ,,:00 ~.~ 15" 1-'Z'O(
{3 . .3 0 9·~ I $", r-z .<[
1'-(:00 y.~ 1~'1-'(.'0
/..'( . 30 ~.~ IS':} '2,4,
15:D D <6.(0 15·r, Z·fs'
IS"· 3D ~.(., (1)' .h z .. "1-
1&: 00 <6'~ ( S,:} z...¥,
I G . ;, 0 g.. t. IS. 8" Z· +-
17 : ve> fj.(p f r).g-'2 -;J-
(1: ~ 0 ~,& ( S".7[ 2·'1
~~;OD q .", 1('·1-1.0
(~; ~(> <£.& lc;:r S·c)
.I"i ! 00 , 1'.h It"r ,.2.,,/ ,I
Ie,', ~t> ~,(p ((;',1-, '0"1 '11 ----
Facility Denison Mines, Blanding, Utah
Location North 3110~ Cake Scrubber
Date (kLu('j
I i
Scrubber Flow (gpm)
Run# Time #1 #2
1-<? :OD IO'{ I<../.~
~ ¥,' 3 tl
C, : '" II ()Dw VI \Col
"1:30 -
(o: 00 -
I d: 3'1l I V ,r" lc{.>
(I, 00 11,'1 I-{.)
It; 30 rl, "1, ( '1. ~
1z-:6c> I Z-'), 1,-\,""
12-'.30 [l)' ) \ 'Z. . 2-
13 :00 lo' ? \o.t1
13 3D to. 'f 10 . 'i
ty: U D {l)·5~ (0' '1
"-I ~ 30 (0 'Y (() '/
's-: 110 10' ') 10 '''l
IS-: 3D ('D' ") 10 '1
/1,: 'tiD it!· '> 1 b-'l
/" : > 0 Co 11.. !O'1
tJ: 00 (0') \0."\
i7 '. >0 to'2 (0' 7
II": 00 Ill-"" (& • /
IV, 30 !(),"7 10''7
14: 0", 10'7 ( D'1
1'1'3D
2": cd
Notes:
t,p
"H2O
~,;:,
1/, 0~t<-. if >", l, LL.
-;,c)
;2.'''1
'2 -1
~·O
"J.()
}D
'Z-. '7
30
7,.,'7
3, cJ
'2".0
~·O
'['1
~. 0
3·()
3,':) ,·0
~. D
APPENDIXE
Calibration of the console dry gas meter(s), pitot tubes, nozzles diameters, and temperature
sensors were carried out in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance
Handbook. The appropriate calibration data are presented in the following pages. The nozzle
calibrations are recorded on the first page of the field data sheets.
Figure 3 Schematic of Method 5/114 Sampling Train
Meter Box Calibration Data and Calculations Forms
Post-test Dry Gas Meter Calibration Data Forms
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration
E
Duct
wall
Schematic of Method 5i114 Sampling Train
Track
Support
Chain
Thermometer Vacuum
, ® ~ Guage
Impingerj GJ . ii!L Sampling Probe ~ Heated -. Filter ~. "~ ---c---Box
Exit
i Metering,
! Console
Figure 3
Check Valve
Vacuum
Line
Main
Valve By-pass
Valve
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES • J~ rUNS ,tMWM4i!r:t ~~~ .
1) Selecllhree critical "rir,ces to cal:brate the dry gas meier wtJic:h bracket the expected operati":;! rarlge. ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY 2) Record barometric ~ressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested IIllcuum (from Orifice Cllhbra~io" Report). for a period of time
necessary to a:h,el'e a mi~imum tolal lIotume of 5 cubic fuel.
4) Record date and ir'Jormat,,,,, in Ihe GRE£.f: cells. YELLOW cells are calc"lated.
tNtTIAL
2009 pre-Calibration
FtNAl AVG(P".)
... ~,~".~",-.~ "."" ... ,.. ... ...,"'n ...... ""'..,'-""' .... ~i '-"~" ! .... "'<J'rn"".'.~~. =r"'''C~'~~~,e#6~ -... ---.. ------.. --.. -! --
K' TESTED TEMPERATURES 'F ELAPSED II B j.
FACTOR VACUUM! OGM READINGS IFn I AMBIENT DGMINlET DGMOUTLET OGM TlMEIMINI! DGMlIH (1) (21 (.3) Y I ORIFICE# j RUN~ (AVG) (InHg) J INITIAL I FINAL NET{V.,J III:TIAL fl>.U\l ImTIAL FI~AL AVG e III (;nH,D) ) V..,(STO) I V,,(STD) I Y I VAAIATIOUr;,~
G 1 0.8137 13 439.199 i 44S.ZS8 6.Cl57 T2 53 83 98 97 90.25 L 5.50 F
30 2 0.8137 13 445.256 I 45G.770 5.514 72 83 S4 87 107 92.75 ! 5.00 ~
J G.8137 13 450.770 ! 458.239 5.519 72 84 S4-107 108 95.75 i 5.00 ~
G 1 0.5317 12 403.102 411l.115 7.013 70 71! 73 82 90 79.00 10.00 1.20
19 2 0.5317 12 410.115 415.405 5.290 70 73! 75 80 97 83.75 7.53 1.20
3 0.5317 12 415.405 421.063 5.65/1. 70 75, 76 97 101 87.75 8.00 ~
G 1 0.3307 12 421.400 J 428.671 5.271 71 77 79 96 I 96 /1.7.00 12.00! §"
12 2 0.3307 12 426.671 ! 431.7~O 5.089 11 79 /1.1 96 I 99 88.75 11.50! 0.45
3 0.3307 12 431.760 ') 436.182 8.422 71 81 83 99 \ 100 90.75 14.50 I 0.45
AVG; .1.&.1.Q. "" USING THE cRITICAL ORIFICESAS CAlI8RATION STANDARDS'
Th" fdlowi"9 aqu<t.'o~. 3re ~wd l()catc<l131e !~s ~t",~da:dvok;m~; ~f art passed ~~,'ov;~ ~~e DGY:.~i.ioj).;me li"le ~'ii:"cal C<",fiC!l. V,.
(tlal .• ~d the Ow. ,alb,a:;,;m fa~w. Y. 7hsseequa:",os ale a:I:~",;;!ic:a'ly :;ablaled i, the s;>ro:r.::shee: <)lx;,.". AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y =U·oro I
(1'
I"
p,
Vm ... ~ '" K, * Vm" Pbar+ (!J.H 113.6)
Tm
= Net volume of gas sample passed IIl;O".JQh DGM, c:lrrected to standard cond~ions
K. = 17.64 'RIi". Hg (Englo<h). O.3SSS'I(;mm H9" (Me:ri,)
Ve, .<oJ) '" K' .. Poor ~ ~ . ,/7"amh
y"" V~',;"",,
Vm".&,
T _. '" Absolute O(;M avg. tempe,<)tor" tR. Enghsh."K· Metric)
= Volume of gas. sample passed through the cri!;cal orifice. Ctlrre:!ed to standa~d ccnd,~ons
T,~~ '" A~sof:.o! .. am~'oenl !empefslufe tR. Eng/,sh.'K. Melr~)
K' ~ Avera;c K' facIo' from Clai~1 Or;fi~e C~libmUon
'" D8M cal,b'atmn fact:r
AVERAGE t.He "'11.SSSJ
t.H~" (Q 75 €I )' ,H (V.,,(Sld))
V,,(std) v".
Tempel"3tufe Sensors
Reference In 0"' OF "F OF
33 34 " 67 66 65
'" '" '"
PRE CO~501e ~ CalJlJration 2008
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
J ,,.. .. ,.~,~-.-
• Ji@n.&';;.-1f@.ffi"'1i"~ l~;.--·~;
1) Select three critical orifICes to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GR~EN cells, YELlOWcefis are calculated.
'" 88092 I
INITIAL
,.;;>.;;>VI<I: I'" nyd 25,47 I I
..... , .. ,," .. ,," ...!conSOIe7! .... ,,' " .... " ... VI"<,rovO:; <>1:, .;;>0:" ........ #:L 14535 _.! <:IoIU' ...... "'~, IV If • Console #7 J
K' TESTEO TEMPERATURES of
FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (Fl") I AMBIENT DGMINLET DGMOUTLET DOM
I ORIFICE # I RUN # (AVG) (inHg) INITIAL ! FINAL NET fVml l mmAL Fl"AL l"ImAL F1~AL AVO
G 1 0.8137 " 2S3-S23 2S8.953 SA30 75 " " " " 91.75
2 0.8137 " 2S8.953 274.388 5.435 7S " " " " 92.5 , 0.8137 " 274.388 280.896 6.508 75 87 87 " " "
G , , 0.5317 " 246.000 251.288 5.288 75 " " " " 87.00 , 0.5317 " 251.288 256.950 5.662 75 " " " " 86.60 , 0.5317 " 256.950 262.588 5.638 75 " .. " " 89.25
G 8.404 74.75
2 5.195 78.75
5.239 80.50
0.3307 12 228.501 234.905 7S 72 " 71 " 74.75
0.3307 12 234.905 240.101) 75 14 " 82 " 78.75
Q.3307 12 I 240.101) 245.339 75 77 " " 84 80.50
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
FINAL , ".~~
25.47 I
ELAPSED
TIME (MIN)
e
5,00
5.00
S.OO
7.50
7.SS
8,00
15.00 15.00
12.1)0 12.1)0
12.1)0 12.00
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY
2009 Pre-Calibration
AVG (PM)
'-''''''''''''' .,,...,, ........ ~~ " .. "'~ .. ,-,~ ,~-~ BI (1)1 (2) I (3)
jYARlA:ON(%) ~ (in H,O) V~(STOf V" (STO) y
,--
~
~
~
,--
~
~
~
0'" 0'" 5.3908
OA' OA' ~
0.46 0.46 43632
AVG'"
54639
lllli
~
AVG=
1.&..@
1&!!
.t.!?QI
:1.fl!!l
1.:QQZ.
.Qd!
!!.11!.
1.64
1.,.§
ill
The following equations are used to cab;late the standard \IOklmes of air passed througtl tM DGM. V ,,(std). and the critical
orifice, V" (std). and the OGM calibration factor. Y. These equakns ale autorna:icaliy cal~ulated in the spreadsheet abo~. AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CAlIBRAT!ON FACTOR, Y -r -1.oo·if J
(1)
(2)
(3)
Vmw", "" K, ",Vm'" Pbar+{!1H /!3.6) rm '" Net volume of gas sample passed lhrough DGM. corrected :0 standard conditions
K, " 17.04 °Rl"tn. Hg (EngJ",s~.). 0.3858 'K/mm Hg (Me\'ic)
Pbar *0 T cr "'-K'· --'r.O"'"'C'-("d) -JTamb
Va;",,!
y", Vm("j;
T M" Absclule DGM al'g. temperature (R -English. ·K _ Metric)
'" Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice. corrected to standard condilions
T,I'"C" Absolu:e ambien: temperature ('R _ English, OK _ Metn::)
K' '" Average K' fa~r ~om Cri',cal Oriflce C<lR,r;;liO:l
"" OGM calibration factor
AVERAGE "H. {}.731 I
.6.H~ '" (0.75!) r aH (Vm(Std))
Ve,(std) v",
Temperature Sensors
Reference ",
32
73
115
10 ",
31
74
1 ~5
0", ",
30
74
114
PRE Console #7 Calibration 2009
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES ~ ~"=-B QllllhfJ -Sent<t:-l(("llII/>tf'lJ ~~,§ -----.--~---'"-'"'"-.&I'i5:" ~.C:g;~
1) Seiect three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter vlhich bracket the expected operaling range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet
4) Record data and in/onnation in fne GREEN celis, YEllOW celfs are calculated
METER SERIAL #:r~=~-j
CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL II: 1453S EQUIPMENT ID II:
K" TESTED
FACTOR VACUUM
RUN# /AVG) (In Hg)
0.53-17 " 135.&02
0.53-17 " 140.783-
0.5317 12 146.020
140.783-
14S,{}20
151.625
5.181
5.23-7
5.605
r
1
1
7S
75
75
67170162
"1,,1,,
70 1 74 1 90
so
90
94
DGM
AVG
71.5
77.5
82
71.5
77.5
82
FINAL
r~J
ELAPSED
TIME (MfN)j ,
7.50
7.50
8.00
Facility:
AVG(Pt>,o,)
25.53
~.'"
1.20
1.20 8'
O:ff1 IU-J-j : I I I I I I:: E~l§
O:ff1 ~ : IIIIII::B§
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
.1:illZ
4.4056
4.6760
Denison Mine
IF YVARIATION EXCEEDS 2,00%,
ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
4.4028
~
~
Q,lli
0.999
1.004
1
AVG:= 1.001 !!.QQ
AVG=
AVG::
1:§§
~
~
The fcliowingequatiQns a,e used 10 calculate !he standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, V"" (SId). and the critical ori~ce,
If", (SId). and the DGM calibrauon faclor. Y. Th!!se equ<l'jons are automaticallycalcula1edjn the spreadsheetaoove. AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y= Qoof-,
(1)
(2)
(3)
Vm",./} '" K
I
" Vm* Pbar+(!1H /13.6)
Tm
Pbar" 0
Vo (",1) = K' .. .JTamb
= Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected 10 standard conditions
K, '" ~7.64 °Rlin Hg (English). 0.3858 "K/mm Hg (Metric)
T",:= Absolute DGM avg. temperature ('R -English. "K -Melric)
= Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions
T ",""">t> '" Absolute ambient temperature ('R • English. OK . Metric)
K = Average K' facler from Critical Orifice Calibration
VCYr".{)
y= Vm,-,:.f!
= DGM calibration factor
AVERAGE !!.H@l=C1,64S-,
bHq = (0.75 e )' .H (Vm{std))
Vor{sld} Vm
Temperature Sensors
Reference In Out
OF OF OF
33 34 34
67
121
65
120
66
120
POST Console #6 Calibration 2009
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested vacuum (from 06fice Calibration Report). for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.
METERSERlAl H:c=J
CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL#:~ eQUIPMENT ID #:
K' TESTED TEMPERATURES'F
FACTOR VACUUM L OGM READINGS (FT) AMBIENT I DGM INLET_I DGM OUTlE~ I ! ORIFICE # I RUN II (AVGJ (inHg) , INITIAL ! FINAL I NET (V.) I IINITIAL FJIllAL INITIAl FINAL
0.6S0S 12 A25.5030 434.336 75 67 69 67 74
0.6808 12 A34.335 440.546 75 69 72 74 78
0.5808 12 440.546 446.774 75 72 74 7. 81 G: 8.833
6.210
6.228
INITIAL
DGM
AVG
69.25
73.25
76.25
.Is
Facility
FINAL
[ 25.53
ELAPSED
TIME (MIN)
B
§o.oo
7.00
7.00
'.WiGi1i6 H@l1iii1~§ '!;:;~
Denison Mine
AVGW".,)
25.53
I~GM&~II (1) I (in H~O) V", (STD)
2.18 2.18
2.18 .?J!
2.18 2.18
7.5678
5.2806
~
IF Y VARIATION exCEeDS 2.00%,
ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECAUSRATEO
1
(2) I (3)
I VARlA~ON(%) ~ Ver{STD) y
75166
5 2616
5.2616
0.993
0.996
0.999
AVG '" 0.996 0.00
~
1M§.
1&M.
D:b E§
D:b E§
: 111111:::§§
AVG= : I 1 11 1_1 ::: § §
AVG=
USING THE CRmCAl OR!FICESA$ CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
The following equations are used to ca!cu!ale the standard I'olumesof air passed through the DGM. V", (sid). and the aiticai orifice,
V", (std), and the OGM calibration factor. Y. These equations are automaticaliycaJculated ir) the spreadsheet above. AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y= rO.99SI
(1)
(2)
(3)
Vrn'."<i) =: K, * Vm"" Pbar + (!1H 113.6)
Tm
Vcr:Sld! ::: K'* Pbar *9
·./Tamb
= Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM. corrected to standard condit'lons
K, '" 17.64 OR/in. Hg (English). 0.3858 "KImm Hg (Metric)
T", = Absnlute OGM allg. temperature CR -English, ~ -Metric)
= Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice. corrected to standard conditions
T ..... .<> '" Absolute ambient temperature (OR -Eng!ish. oK -Metric)
K'" Average K' factor from Criti(2i Orifice Cailbr8!ion VC'(~'d; y= -'" DGM calibration factor
Vm("d)
AVERAGEl>H@=/1.847/
lI.H@= (0.75 e )' l>H (Vm{std))
Ve,{std) Vm
POST Console #7 Calibration 2009
Type S Pitot Tube lmipeclioll Data
EL.-~=r" Is P A'" Pn? t"'~~--i" Is 1.05' Dl ::; Dc ~ 1.50'1)1 '!
B"
'~"
ill.
P,,'" \ li fl1 ., 2_.-:'-'-_'-___ "
(AI < IO~
(ll .: IOn
JI,"; SCI 11,' ____ -
(-==Z~dr
L~~-~ w
Zs/J.125 in.
W $0.0.1125 in.
Z'" _-,-,I 0=[ 0",--_ m
!Il.
w '"'" _-''''=-' -,-'{,,2.=--_ in
7,.!-'I--,I3,--_,,, /,-
Tilt. plfO! lubc mecrs the! spccilicaliolls ror a calihnlioll f"lclN MO 1!4.) ''le.s < <
TemperMure SCl)sor Calihfalloll
Rcfcr('llcc: -.-.
TemperMlirc ... T.tllrr<:ralun: ltmp~"llurc
Source --Refcrcnc.e Sens(l! nilf\·rcl)c\'
(IviCdill;n) CF) ('I') tn. -
AIR (.;.8 be, J--Probe ~~I1J!uiJ.Y._ (.~~t:.(...... ~7 Ve"
--lea! Check 248 -) YeS ~S,
AIR 10 be 'L ...• -
ICE WATER ] '[ '] (I {!f
Stack BOll .. WATER 2o~ )0'-/ l
SIUC:ONE OIL -_.-... ---
Date
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
]'::' C-
D\"-' __ .. _' _,_~ ~ill
HI < 10"
{Xl < 10"
z::;o 125 In
WSOO3125in
W > 3 inches
Z> )/tj inch
y 2: 3 inches
Pilot Tube Identification" __ -'d."-_+ __ -_, _b'-~_,, ___ _
(:(1"' __ -=, __ -
(£2 '.-_-,0"", __ _
II, • __ '-__ _
l=-
W'"' • DO (, ill
W'" 3 in
Z= I ;"
'"
The pi tot tube meets the spccifieatlons for a calibration factor of () .8tj"?
Temperature Scn~9r Calibmtioll
R reren' , " n~"
Tl"mpef{lillre Tempcrmurc Temperature
Source RMercnre Sensor Difterenec
(Medium) ("F) ("I') ("F)
AIR (,oS (,,8 ki
Probe COfllllluity \k.>
Heat Chl!ck 248 'Ie::. ';), 00
AIR (.:,"1-(,,8 -I
ICE WATER 33 33 !O
S[<lc.k BOIL WATEH :.( 0 t" ).1>8 ~-.--
SIUCONEOIL
Unit ID
A
B
c
D
E
F
TETCO
Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration
Calibrator:
Thermocouple
Location
Oven
Probe Ollt
Impinger Out
Oven
Probe Ollt
Impingcr Out
Oven
Probe Out
lmpinger Out
Oven
Probe Out
Impillger Out
Oven
Probe Ollt
ImpingeI' Oul
Oven
Probe Qut
lmpinger Out
R,IC,ellc,: Ol"Ie.:,¥A (1_ 3 fl2A
Tern I Tenli>
Difference
(~f)
Water :3 2. 12. ;;;;
Water 2o:l 1.0'1 I
Water 3'1 .32 :z.
Water .:U :3 2. I
Water ;< ~~ J. 0(,-
Wate' Z,,(.. ;"ob
Water '!. '1 3'1 T
Water ,."j'" zo·.} z.
Water 33 33 ~
Water 2 D)-2.oS -.-
Water 33 .~~ ;::;;
Water t 3 3'1 I
Water ;1; 2.., 2.
Water ~ ~
Water 2 nt, ~ 0.) t
Water 33 3t.j I
Water 2.o/'" 2,,(. "-
Water -33 34 I
Wate, ~;;,~ Z.v4 2.
Water ?!:~ 33·-
Water' ao" 2"~'-
Water 3.'\33 ~
Water '),,~ 2,,,,,!--I
Water 33 3'1 J
Water 2."t" 2.0$ I
Water ;:>; 3 3.3 .•
Water ~,,·.f Z"3 :iI.
I i: •••.•• · ••• ;;i··'.·····,jr-I_Ill_Pi_ng_'e_f O_,_,t _G~lrr-_ -.:~~7,~v~aattce~;rr.::~j~:::~ ;~~~ :,~ <:::i:--:..!;2.:-"~~ ... ,,3~:~.~·t~::::~t-=.~~::::::-= I
Impinger Out II Ir_72Wat~er_+ __ 'l~ .. 3~:--+.........:~~'~. "'---+--'=-:.----1
W"ter 2.",:) 20'" I
Impinger Out I Water ~3 '3 </ I .... .... .... ····lr ___ .... II .... _wii-2:.te:.:-r_lI ... _-:~~~·:[_+.....;?~\')"' __ +-IL-__ _ <i <> ImpingerOutJ ~:~: z~~ i:.... -;
APPENDIXF
The testing followed the same procedures as outlined in previous protocols and tests at this
facility.