DRC-2012-002402 - 0901a068803258c2

DRC-2012-00a402
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc,
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www energyfuels com
November 26,2012
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P O Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 3rd Quarter 2012 Groundwater Monitoring Report
Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr Lundberg
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Groundwater Monitonng Report for the 3rd Quarter
of 2012 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Pernut UGW370004, as well as two CDs each
containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me
Yours very truly,
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Jo Ann Tischler
Director, Compliance
CC David C Frydenlund
Harold R Roberts
David E Turk
Katherine A Wemel
Central Files
...... ~-
/" 2]' P-
I lJI:N:RGYFUELS
November 26, 2012
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
3039742140
www.energyfuels.com
Re: Transmittal of 3rd Quarter 2012 Groundwater Monitoring Report
Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Groundwater Monitoring Report for the 3rd Quarter
of 2012 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004, as well as two CDs each
containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truly,/ _ •
L)i2--~
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
JoAnn Tischler
Director, Compliance
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Katherine A. Weinel
Central Files
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
3rd Quarter
(July through September)
2012
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
November 26, 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 IN"TRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Groundwater Discharge Permit Modifications during the Quarter ...................... 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING ....................................................................... 1
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ....................................... 1
2.1.1 Groundwater Compliance Monitoring .......................................................... 1
2.1.2 Accelerated Groundwater Monitoring .......................................................... 2
2.1.3 Background Well Monitoring ....................................................................... 2
2.1.4 Parameters Analyzed .................................................................................... 3
2.1.5 Groundwater Head Monitoring ..................................................................... 3
2.2 Field Data ............................................................................................................. 3
2.3 Laboratory Results -Quarterly Sampling ........................................... ~ ................ 4
2.3.1 Copy of Laboratory Results .......................................................................... 4
2.3.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background ................................ 4
2.4 Laboratory Results -Accelerated Monitoring ..................................................... 5
2.4.1 Copy of Laboratory Results .................. ~ ....................................................... 5
2.4.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background ................................ 5
2.4.3 Compliance Status .............................................................................. -.......... 5
2.5 Depth to Groundwater and Water Table Contour Map ........................................ 6
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION ....................................... 6
3.1 Field QC Samples ................................................................................................. 6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ...................................................................... 7
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ............................................................................. 7
3.4 Data Validation .................................................................................................... 7
3.4.1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation ...................................................................... 8
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................ 10
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ...................................... : .......................... 10
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist ...................................................................... 10
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation ........................................................................ 10
3.4.6 Trip Blank Evaluation ................................................................................. 11
3.4.7 QAlQC Evaluation for Routine Sample Duplicates ................................... 11
3.4.8 Radiologics Counting Error and Duplicate Evaluation .............................. 11
3.4.9 Other Laboratory QAlQC ........................................................................... 12
4.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ...................................................................... 14
5.0 TIME CONCENTRATION PLOTS .................................................. ~ ................... 15
6.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT ................................................... 16
7.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ................................................................ 17
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Well Sampling for the Period
Exceedances and ,Acceleration Requirements
GWCL Exceedances Through Third Quarter 2012 Under the July 14, 2011
and August 24, 2012 GWDP
i
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Field Data Worksheets Quarterly Sampling
Tab C Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
Tab D Quarterly Depth to Water
Tab E Laboratory Analytical Reports -Quarterly Sampling
Tab F Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
Tab G Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
G-IAIB
G-2AIB
G-3AIB
G-4AIB
G-SAIB
G-6AIB
G-7AIB
G-8AIB
G-9AIB
Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
Holding Time Evaluation
Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
Analytical Method Check
Reporting Limit Check
Trip Blank Evaluation
QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Radiologics Counting Error
Laboratory Matrix QC
Tab H Kriged Current Quarterly Groundwater Contour Map and Depth Data
Tab I Groundwater Time Concentration Plots
Tab J CSV Transmittal Letter
ii
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This is the Routine Groundwater Monitoring Report, as required under Part I.F.1 of State
of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (the "GWDP") for the third
quarter of 2012 (the "quarter") for Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc's. ("EFRI's")
White Mesa Uranium Mill (the "Mill"). As required under Parts I.E.1, I.E.2 and I.E.5 of
the GWDP this Report includes all recorded field measurements and laboratory analyses
for well monitoring conducted during the quarter.
1.1 Groundwater Discharge Permit Modifications during the Quarter
During the third quarter of 2012, the approved July 14, 2011 GWDP was revised on
August 24,2012. The revision incorporated the EFRI name change from Denison Mines
(USA) Corp. No changes were issued to the Groundwater Compliance Limits
("GWCLs") specified in Table 2 or to the groundwater monitoring program described
herein.
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing
wells, chloroform contaminant investigation wells and nitrate contaminant investigation
wells is attached under Tab A. Groundwater samples and measurements were taken
during this reporting period (July through September), as discussed in the remainder of
this section.
2.1.1 Groundwater Compliance Monitoring
Groundwater samples and field measurements collected during the quarter included
quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated monitoring. Accelerated monitoring is discussed
below in Section 2.1.2. In the narrative in Sections 2 and 3 of this quarterly report,
samples classified as being collected quarterly include those wells which are sampled
every quarter and the wells sampled semi-annually. Wells which are sampled routinely
every quarter and semi-annually were analyzed for the parameters listed in Table 2 and
Part I.E.I.c) 2) ii of the GWDP dated July 14, 2011 and August 24,2012.
Table 1 of this report provides an overview of all wells sampled during the current
period, along with the required sampling frequency applicable to each well during the
current monitoring period, the date samples were collected from each well, and the
date(s) analytical data were received from the contract laboratory(ies). Table 1 also
indicates which sample numbers are associated with the required duplicates. During this
quarter, three wells and one duplicate were resampled. The following is a list of wells
which were resampled and the reason for the resampling effort:
1
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW.doc
• MW -26 and MW -65 (duplicate of MW -26) were resampled for volatile organic
compounds ("VOCs") due to a laboratory issue which resulted in poor agreement
between the sample (MW-26) and the duplicate (MW-65) .
• MW-28 was resampled for manganese. Manganese exceeded the GWCL in MW-
28 in second quarter 2012. MW-28 was accelerated for manganese in third
quarter 2012. The second sample collected for MW-28 during the third quarter
was analyzed for manganese.
• MW-29 was resampled for Total Dissolved Solids ("TDS") and manganese.
Manganese and TDS exceeded their respective GWCLs in MW-29 in second
quarter 2012. MW-29 was accelerated for manganese and TDS in third quarter
2012. The second sample collected for MW-29 during the third quarter captured
manganese and TDS.
2.1.2 Accelerated Groundwater Monitoring.
Accelerated monthly sampling was also performed (quarterly wells accelerated to
monthly), and results reported, for the wells indicated in Table 1. The accelerated
sampling frequency, analyte list and well list were determined based on the previous
analytical results as shown in Table 2.
Table 1 provides an overview of the wells sampled for the accelerated monthly program
along with the routine sampling frequency as well as the accelerated sampling frequency,
the date samples were collected from each well, the associated duplicates and the date( s)
which analytical data were received from the contract laboratory(ies).
2.1.3 Background Well Monitoring
A requirement was added to the GWDP on February 15,2011, which required the Mill to
begin quarterly sampling of wells MW-35, MW-36 and MW-37 to develop eight quarters
of background data. MW-35, which was installed in the third quarter 2010, has been
sampled quarterly since the fourth quarter of 2010. With the third quarter 2012 sample,
eight full quarters of data have been collected for MW -35. Preliminary statistical
analysis of the MW-35 data showed extremes in the TDS data. Per the logic flow
diagram included as Figure 17 of the New Wells Background Report (INTERA, 2008),
extreme values are excluded from the background calculations. The removal of the
extremes resulted in less than the eight required data points needed for background
calculations. DRC personnel agreed via telephone on October 3, 2012 that EFRI should
delay the submission of the MW -35 background report until at least eight quarters of
usable data, suitable for background calculations, were collected for all constituents.
DRC and EFRI agreed that the background report for MW-35 would be submitted in first
quarter 2013 if· at least eight quarters of data were collected for every constituent by that
time. If there are not eight data points for each constituent, DRC and EFRI would discuss
an alternate schedule or further actions.
MW-36 and MW-37, which were installed during the second quarter of 2011, were
sampled for the first time during the second quarter of 2011. Quarterly samples will
2
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW.doc
continue to be collected until 8 quarters of data are available to complete the background
report as required by the GWDP.
2.1.4 Parameters Analyzed
All routine quarterly and semi-annual groundwater monitoring samples were analyzed for
the parameters listed in Table 2 and Part I.E.I.c) 2) ii of the GWDP dated July 14,2011
and August 24, 2012. The accelerated monitoring samples were analyzed for a more
limited and specific parameter list as shown in Table 2.
2.1.5 Groundwater Head Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells and/or piezometers, pursuant
to Part I.E.2 of the GWDP dated February IS, 2011:
• The quarterly groundwater compliance monitoring wells (including, MW-34).
• Existing monitoring well MW -4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation
wells.
• Piezometers -P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-S.
• Nitrate monitoring wells.
• The DR piezometers which were installed during the Southwest Hydrogeologic
Investigation.
• In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in
conjunction with sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and
accelerated efforts, regardless of the sampling purpose.
All water levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded
within S calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the
summary sheet under Tab D.
2.2 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all field data sheets recorded in association with the
quarterly effort (sampled in July) for the groundwater compliance monitoring wells
referred to in paragraph 2.1.1, above. Sampling dates are listed in Table 1. Tab B also
includes field data sheets for all resampling efforts conducted during this quarter.
Attached under Tab C are copies of all field data sheets recorded in association with the
August and September 2012 accelerated monitoring and sampling efforts.
3
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW.doc
2.3 Laboratory Results -Quarterly Sampling
2.3.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
All analytical results are provided by one of the Mill's two contract analytical
laboratories EL or A W AL.
Table 1 lists the dates when analytical results were reported to the Quality Assurance
("QA") Manager for each well.
Results from analysis of samples collected under the GWDP (i.e:, all regular quarterly
and semi-annual samples are provided in Tab E. Also included under Tab E are the
results of analyses for duplicate samples as identified in Table 1.
The laboratory report dates for samples collected for the August and September
accelerated sampling (i.e. quarterly accelerated to monthly) are provided in Table 1.
Results from analysis of samples collected for the August and September accelerated
sampling (i.e. quarterly accelerated to monthly) are provided in Tab F. Also included
under Tab F are the results of analyses for duplicate samples for this sampling effort, as
identified in Table 1.
Copies of laboratory QAlQuality Control ("QC") Summaries are included with the
reported data under their corresponding Tabs.
2.3.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background
Under the GWDP dated July 14, 2011 and August 24, 2012 background groundwater
quality has been determined on a well-by-well 'basis, as defined by the mean plus second
standard deviation concentration or the equivalent. GWCLs that reflect this background
groundwater quality have been set for all monitoring wells except MW-35. It is
important to note that the GWDP dated February 15,2011 also set GWCLs for MW-35.
The GWCLs for MW-35 have been set at one-quarter of the Utah Groundwater Quality
Standard ("GWQS"), pending determination of background for the well, and are not
based on eight quarters of data from that well. A background report for MW-35 will be
completed after the collection of eight quarters of data for all constituents.
Exceedances of the GWCLs determined the accelerated monthly monitoring program
implemented during this quarter as noted in Tables 1 and 2.
Exceedances of the GWCLs for this quarter are listed in Table 2 for sampling required
under the revised GWDP July 14, 2011 and August 24, 2012. Table 3 shows the
accelerated sampling program which started in the second quarter 2010 and shows the
results and frequency of the accelerated sampling conducted since that time.
4
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW,doc
It should be noted, however, that, because the GWCLs have been set at the mean plus
second standard deviation, or the equivalent, un-impacted groundwater would normally
be expected to exceed the GWCLs approximately 2.5% of the time. Therefore,
exceedances are expected in approximately 2.5% of all sample results, and do not
necessarily represent impacts to groundwater from Mill operations.
2.4 Laboratory Results -Accelerated Monitoring
2.4.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
The analytical results for the accelerated monthly monitoring of the various constituents
in certain monitoring wells for the quarter are provided at Tab F.
2.4.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background
As a result of the issuance of a revised GWDP on January 20, 2010, which sets revised
GWCLs, all requirements to perform accelerated monitoring under Part I.G.1 of the
previous GWDP ceased effective on January 20, 2010, and the effect of the issuance of
the revised GWDP was to create a "clean slate" for all constituents in all wells going ,
forward.
This means that accelerated monitoring during this quarter was required under the revised
GWDP for only those constituents that exceeded the GWCLs since January 20,2010.
2.4.3 Compliance Status
Analytes which have exceeded the GWCLs set forth in the GWDP are summarized in
Table 2. The analytes which exceeded their respective GWCLs during the quarter will be
sampled on an accelerated schedule as noted in Table 2. Analytes which exceeded their
respective GWCLs during 2010 are currently sampled on an accelerated schedule. A
review of the accelerated data collected during the quarter indicate that several analytes
have exceeded their respective GWCLs for two consecutive sampling periods as reported
in EFRI's letter to DRC on November 15, 2012. Table 3 summarizes the results of the
accelerated sampling program from first quarter 2010 through third quarter 2012.
Part I.G.1 c) of the GWDP states, with respect to exceedances of GWCLs, "that the
Permittee shall prepare and submit within 30 calendar days to the Executive Secretary a
plan and a time schedule for assessment of the sources, extent and potential dispersion of
the contamination, and an evaluation of potential remedial action to restore and maintain
groundwater quality to insure that Permit limits will not be exceeded at the compliance
monitoring point and that DMT or BAT will be reestablished." EFRI submitted an
exceedance notice on November 15, 2012 for the third quarter 2012 results. The
summary in the Exceedance Notice includes, for each exceedance, a brief discussion of
whether such a plan and schedule is required at this time in light of other actions
currently being undertaken by EFRI, as determined by DRC Staff and stated In
5
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW.doc
teleconferences with EFRI on April 27 and May 2, 2011 and the Stipulated Consent
Agreement ("SCA") dated July 12, 2012.
2.5 Depth to Groundwater and Water Table Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the quarter (shown as depth to
groundwater in feet) is included under Tab D. The data from Tab D has been interpreted
(kriged) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under Tab H.
The water table contour map provides the location and identity of all of the wells and
piezometers for which depth to groundwater is recorded. The groundwater elevation at
each well and piezometer, measured in feet above mean sea level, and isocontour lines to
delineate groundwater flow directions observed during the quarter's sampling event are
displayed on the map.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION
The Mill QA Manager performed a QAlQC review to confirm compliance of the
monitoring program with requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA
includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures,
an analyte completeness review, and quality control review of laboratory data methods
and data. Identification of field QC samples collected and analyzed is' provided in
Section 3.1. Discussion of adherence to Mill sampling Standard Operating Procedures
("SOPs") is provided in Section 3.2. Analytical completeness review results are provided
in Section 3.3. The steps and tests applied to check laboratory data QAlQC are discussed
in Sections 3.4.4 through 3.4.10 below.
The Analytical Laboratories have provided summary reports of the analytical QAlQC
measurements necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental
Laboratory Accreditation Conference ("NELAC") certification and reporting protocol.
The analytical laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports, including copies of the Mill's Chain
of Custody and Analytical Request Record forms for each set of Analytical Results,
follow the analytical results under Tabs E and F. Results of review of the laboratory
QAlQC information are provided under Tab G and discussed in Section 3.4, below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following field QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the
analytical laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field
sampling program:
Two duplicate samples were collected during quarterly sampling as indicated in Table 1.
The QC samples were sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same
parameters as permit-required samples.
6
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater QUaIterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW.doc
One duplicate sample was collected during each month of accelerated sampling as
indicated in Table 1. The QC samples were sent blind to the analytical laboratory and
anal yzed for the same accelerated parameters as the parent sample.
Three trip blanks were provided by EL and returned and analyzed with the quarterly
monitoring samples.
One trip blank per month was provided by EL and returned and analyzed with the
accelerated monthly monitoring samples.
Two trip blanks were provided by AWAL and returned and analyzed with the quarterly
monitoring samples.
Accelerated monthly monitoring was no longer required for tetrahydrofuran ("THF") in
MW-11 after April 2012, per DRC correspondence dated April 16,2012, therefore, an
accelerated monthly sample and the associated trip blank were not necessary in the
August and September 2012 monthly sampling events.
Rinsate samples were not collected during the quarter because all equipment used during
sample collection was dedicated and did not require decontamination. All wells except
MW-37 have dedicated pumps for purging and sampling and as such no rinsate blanks
samples are required. MW-37 was sampled with a disposable bailer and no rinsate blank
was required. A deionized field blank (DIFB) was not required because equipment
decontamination was not required and deionized water was not used during this sampling
event.
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the existing sampling SOPs, the QA
Manager observed that QAlQC requirements established in the QAPs were being adhered
to and that the SOP's were implemented, except as described below.
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for the quarterly and semi-annual wells were
performed. The accelerated sampling for the semi-annual wells (semi-annual to
quarterly) was completed as required by the GWDP and as shown in Tables 2 and 3. The
accelerated quarterly sampling (quarterly to monthly) required for this quarter, as shown
in Tables 2 and 3, was performed as required.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAPs and GWDP identify the data validation steps and data quality control checks
required for the groundwater monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements,
the QA Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QAlQC evaluation, a
receipt temperature check, a holding time check, an analytical method check, a reporting
7
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater QUaiterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW.doc
limit check, a trip blank check, a QAlQC evaluation of routine sample duplicates, a
QAlQC evaluation of accelerated sample duplicates, a gross alpha counting error
evaluation and a review of each laboratory's reported QAlQC information. Each
evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results
of each test are provided under Tab G.
3.4.1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their
adherence with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of
information: the Field Data Sheets and the Quarterly Depth to Water summary sheet.
Review of the Field Data Sheets addresses well purging volumes and the stability of the
following field parameters (based upon the purging method chosen): conductance, pH,
temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Stability of field parameters and well
sampling techniques are dependent on the purging technique employed. Review of the
Depth to Water data confirms that all depth measurements were conducted within a five-
day period. The results of this quarter's review are provided in Tab G.
There are three purging strategies specified in Revision 7.2 of the QAP that are used to
remove stagnant water from the casing during groundwater sampling at the Mill. The
three strategies are as follows:
1. Purging three well casing volumes with a single measurement of field parameters
2. Purging two casing volumes with stable field parameters (within 10% RPD)
3. Purging a well to dryness and stability of a limited list of field parameters after
recovery
During both the third quarter sampling event and the two monthly events, the purging
technique used was two casing volumes with stable field parameters (pH, Conductivity,
Redox, temperature and turbidity) except for the following four wells that were purged to
dryness: MW-03A, MW-23, MW-24, and MW-37.
Based upon the review of the Field Data Sheets, all quarterly and semi-annually sampled
locations conformed to the QAP requirement for purging using the two casing volume
technique except for MW-37. This well was evacuated to dryness before two casing
volumes could be removed. MW -37 has insufficient water to purge using a pump. Due to
the small volume of water present, this well is purged and sampled using a disposable
bailer. MW-37 conformed to the QAP, Revision 7.2 requirement for sampling low yield
wells which includes the collection of three field parameters (pH, specific conductance
["conductivity"] and temperature) immediately prior to and immediately following
sample collection. Stabilization of pH, conductivity and temperature were within the
QAP, Revision 7.2 required 10% RPD.
Review of field sheets indicated that MW-03A, MW-23 and MW-24 were purged dry
after two casing volumes were removed. Because these wells were purged dry, the
requirements for sampling low yield wells which includes the collection of three field
8
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Oroundwater Quatterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 OW.doc
parameters (pH, specific conductance ["conductivity"] and temperature) immediately
prior to and immediately following sample collection was employed. Stabilization of pH,
conductivity and temperature were within the QAP, Revision 7.2 required 10% RPD.
Additionally, two casing volumes were not purged from MW-26, prior to sampling
because MW-26 is a continuously pumped well. If a well is continuously pumped, it is
pumped on a set schedule per the remediation plan and is considered sufficiently
evacuated to immediately collect a sample; however, if apumping well has been out of
service for 48 hours or more, EFRI will follow the purging requirements outlined in
Attachment 2-3 of the QAP.
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP, Revision 7.2 requirements
resulted in the observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Attachment 2-3
specifically state that field parameters must be stabilized to within 10% over at least two
consecutive measurements. The QAP Attachment 2-3 states that turbidity should be less
than 5 NTU prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a higher
turbidity. The QAP Attachment 2-3 does not require that turbidity measurements be less
than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such the noted observations regarding turbidity
measurements greater than 5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• Turbidity measurements were less than 5 NTU for all of the quarterly and semi-
annual wells except MW-12, MW-25, MW-29, MW-29 resample, MW-32 and
MW-37. Per the QAP, Revision 7.2, Attachment 2-3, Turbidity measurements
prior to sampling were within a 10% RPD for all quarterly and semi -annual wells
except MW-03A, MW-23 , MW-24, and MW-37. In all instances these wells
were purged to dryness either before two casing volumes were removed (MW-37)
or immediately after two casing volumes were removed. Because these wells
were purged to dryness, per the QAP, Revision 7.2 Attachment 2-3 turbidity is not
required to be measured. The turbidity measurement is provided for information
purposes only.
• Turbidity measurements were less than 5 NTU for all of the August and
September accelerated sampling wells except MW -31 in the September monthly
event. As previously stated, the QAP does not require that turbidity be less than 5
NTU. Turbidity measurements prior to sampling were within a 10% RPD for all
accelerated sampling wells
All other field parameters (conductance, pH, redox potential, and temperature) for all
wells were within the required RPD for the quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated
sampling.
During review of all of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel
consistently recorded depth to water for the quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated
sampling programs to the nearest 0.01 foot.
9
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW.doc
EFRI's letter to DRC of March 26, 2010 discusses further why turbidity does not appear
to be an appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to DRC's
subsequent correspondence dated June 1,2010 and June 24, 2010, EFRI has completed a
monitoring well redevelopment program. The redevelopment report was submitted to
DRC on September 30, 2011. DRC responded to the redevelopment report via letter on
November 15, 2012. Per the DRC letter dated November 15, 2012, the field data
generated this quarter are compliant with the turbidity requirements of the approved
QAP.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample
holding time checks are provided under Tab G. All samples were received and analyzed
within the required holding time except the VOCs in the September monthly sample of
MW-26 and the associated trip blank, which, due to laboratory error, were analyzed
outside of the holding time. Corrective actions for this deviation are discussed in Section
4.0.
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluati~n
Chain of Custody sheets (for AWAL) and temperature blank data sheets (for EL) were
reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement in Table 1 that samples be
received at 6°C or lower. Sample receipt temperature checks are provided under Tab G.
All quarterly, semi -annual and accelerated samples were received within the required
temperature limit.
It is important to note that per Table 1 in the approved QAP, samples submitted for
metals and gross alpha analyses do not have a sample temperature requirement. The
metals and gross alpha analyses were shipped with analyses that do have a temperature
requirement and as such were shipped on ice.
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by both laboratories were checked against the required
methods specified in the appropriate revision of Table 1 of the QAP. Analytical method
check results are provided in Tab G. The review indicated that all quarterly, semi-annual
and accelerated samples were analyzed in accordance with the QAP.
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits reported by both laboratories were checked against
the reporting limits specified in the QAP Table 1. Reporting limit evaluations are
provided in Tab G. All analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting
limits except that several sets of quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated sample results
had the reporting limit raised for at least one analyte due to matrix interference and/or
10
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW.doc
-lJ
sample dilution as noted in Section 3.4.9. In all cases the reported value for the analyte
was -higher than the increased detection limit.
3.4.6 Trip Blank Evaluation
All trip blank results were reviewed to identify any VOC sample contamination which is
the result of sample handling and shipment. Trip blank evaluations are provided in Tab
G. All trip blank results associated with both the quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated
samples were less than detection level for all VOCs.
3.4.7 QAlQC Evaluation for Routine Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of
duplicate and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the
duplicate and original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured
results are less than 5 times the required detection limit. This standard is based on the
EPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for
all duplicate pairs for all analytes regardless of whether or not the reported concentrations
are greater than 5 times the required detection limits; however, data will be considered
noncompliant only when the results are greater than 5 times the required detection limit
and the RPD is greater than 20%. The additional duplicate information is provided for
information purposes.
All duplicate results were within a 20% RPD in the quarterly and semi-annual samples.
Results of the RPD test are provided under Tab G.
All duplicate results were within a 20% RPD in the accelerated samples. Results of the
RPD test are provided under Tab G.
3.4.8 Radiologies Counting Error and Duplicate Evaluation
Section 9.14 of the QAP requires that all gross alpha analysis reported with an activity
equal to or greater than the GWCL shall have a counting variance that is equal to or less
than 20% of the reported activity concentration. An error term may be greater than 20%
of the reported activity concentration when the sum of the activity concentration and
error term is less than or equal to the GWCL.
Section 9.4 of the QAP also requires a comparability check between the sample and field
duplicate sample results utilizing the formula provided in the text.
Results of quarterly, semi-annual, and accelerated radiologic sample QC are provided
under Tab G. All quarterly, semi-annual, and accelerated radiologic sample results met
the counting error requirements specified in the QAP.
11
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW.doc
3.4.9 Other Laboratory QAlQC.
Section 9.2 of all revisions of the QAP require that the laboratory's QAlQC Manager
check the following items in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information
is correct and complete, (2) analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate
analytical laboratory procedures are followed, (4) analytical results are correct and
complete, (5) QC samples are within established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC
limits, (7) special sample preparation and analytical requirements have been met, and (8)
documentation is complete. In addition to other laboratory checks described above,
EFRI's QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items (5) and (6)) to confirm that
the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for spike duplicates are
within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative sufficiently explains
any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are provided under
Tab G. All lab QAlQC results from both EL and A W AL samples for compounds
regulated under the GWDP met these requirements. There were QC results which did not
meet laboratory established acceptance limits, as identified in Tab G and described
below.
Multiple sets of quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated sample results had the reporting
limit raised for at least one analyte due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution. In
all cases the reported value for the analyte was higher than the increased detection limit.
Data are qualified by the laboratory with a "D" flag when the reporting limit is raised due
to dilution or matrix interferences.
The check samples included at least the following: a method blank, a laboratory control
spike ("LCS"), a matrix spike ("MS") and a matrix spike duplicate ("MSD"), or the
equivalent, where applicable. It should be noted that:
• Laboratory fortified blanks are equivalent to LCSs.
• Laboratory reagent blanks are equivalent to method blanks.
• Post digestion spikes are equivalent to MSs.
• Post digestion spike duplicates are equivalent to MSDs.
• For method E900.1, used to determine gross alpha, a sample duplicate was
used instead of a MSD.
All qualifiers, and the corresponding explanations reported in the QAlQC Summary
Reports for any of the check samples for any of the analytical methods were reviewed by
the QA Manager.
The QAP, Section 8.1.2 require that a MSIMSD pair be analyzed with each analytical
batch. The QAPs do not specify acceptance limits for the MSIMSD pair, and the QAP
does not specify that the MSIMSD pair be prepared on EFRI samples only. Acceptance
limits for MSIMSDs are set by the laboratories. The review of the information provided
by the laboratories in the data packages verified that the requirements in the QAP, to
analyze a MSIMSD pair with each analytical batch, were met. While the QAP does not
12
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Oroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 OW.doc
require it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established
acceptance limits. The QAP does not require this level of review and the results of this
review are provided for information only.
The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the
MSIMSDs recoveries and the associated RPDs for all quarterly and semi-annual samples
were within acceptable laboratory limits for all regulated compounds except as indicated
in Tab G. The EL MS recoveries and RPDs which are outside the laboratory established
acceptance limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data because the recoveries
and RPDs above or below the acceptance limits are indicative of matrix interference.
Matrix interferences are applicable to the individual sample results only. Furthermore,
several of the MSIMSD samples in Work Order Numbers C12070448, C12070741,
C12080830, and C12080143, which were spiked for the MSIMSD analyses, were not
collected at the Mill, and as such the matrix interference is not applicable to the Mill
samples reported herein. The requirement in the QAP to analyze a MSIMSD pair with
each analytical batch was met and as such the data are compliant with the QAP.
The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the
MSIMSDs recoveries and the associated RPDs for all accelerated samples were within
acceptable laboratory limits for all regulated compounds except as indicated in Tab G.
The recoveries and RPDs which are outside of the laboratory established acceptance
limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data because the recoveries and RPDs
above the acceptance limits are indicative of matrix interference. Furthermore, the
MSIMSD sample in Work Order Number C12090804 that was spiked for the MSIMSD
analyses, were not collected at the Mill, and as such the matrix interference is not
applicable to the Mill samples reported herein. The requirement in the QAP to analyze
a MSIMSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such the data are compliant
with the QAP.
The QAP specifies that surrogate compounds shall be employed for all organic analyses
but the QAP does not specify acceptance limits for surrogate recoveries. The information
from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the surrogate recoveries for
all quarterly, semi -annual and accelerated samples were within acceptable laboratory
limits for all surrogate compounds except as indicated in Tab G. The surrogate
compounds outside of acceptance limits, are most likely the result of laboratory spiking
compound degradation. This is apparent because the same surrogate compound was
outside of compliance limits in all samples analyzed within a specific period of time and
in the same Work Order. There is no effect on the quality or usability of the data
because there are multiple surrogates added to each sample and all other surrogates were
within limits. Furthermore, there are no requirements in the QAP for surrogate
recoveries. Since surrogate compounds were added to all of the organic analyses as
required by the QAP, the data are compliant with the requirements in the QAP.
The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the LCS
recoveries for both the quarterly and accelerated samples were within acceptable
laboratory limits for all LCS compounds except as noted in Tab G. As indicated on Tab
13
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW.doc
G, the LCS recoveries which were outside of acceptance limits were noted for the same
analysis within the same month. The LCS recoveries outside of acceptance limits are
most likely due to poor spiking techniques. It is important to note that there is no
requirement in the QAP for LCS recovery assessment.
All revisions of the QAP, Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be
accompanied by a method blank. All analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which
is a blank sample made and carried through all analytical steps. For the Mill samples, a
method blank was prepared for all analytical methods. Per the approved QAP,
contamination detected in analysis of method blanks will be used to evaluate any
analytical laboratory contamination of environmental samples. QAP Revision 7.2 states
that non-conformance conditions will exist when contaminant levels in the samples(s) are
not order of magnitude greater than the blank result. One analyte was reported in the
method blanks from EL for the quarterly samples. Method blank results are included in
Tab E. In all cases where the associated sample reported a positive detection, the method
sample results were greater than an order of magnitude relative to the method blank
results reported, that is the detections meet the QAP criteria. The method blank
detections reported by EL do not affect the quality or usability of the data due to the high
level of the constituents in the samples relative to the associated method blank
concentrations. Additionally, blank detections are indicative of a false positive or high
bias to the sample results as the laboratory contribution to the results would likely cause
higher sample results. The requirement in the QAP to analyze a method blank with each
batch and evaluate the results has been completed as required.
4.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
There is one corrective action resulting from third quarter 2012 groundwater sampling
event.
Necessary corrective actions identified during the current monitoring period are described
below, in accordance with Part I.F.1.e of the GWDP
Identification and Definition of the Problem
The September monthly VOC sample from MW-26 and the associated trip blank were
analyzed outside of the required holding time. All other samples were analyzed within the
required holding time. This deviation was due to laboratory error. EFRI was not
informed by the laboratory of the holding time issue until October 12, 2012 which
prevented resampling of the September monthly compliance sample.
Assignment of Responsibility for Investigation of the Problem
The problem has been investigated by the QA Manager.
14
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Oroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 OW.doc
Investigation and Determination of Cause of the Problem
The samples were collected on September 19, 2012 and were received by the laboratory
on September 21, 2012 which is more than sufficient time to analyze two samples from
this sampling event within the required holding time, i.e. the monthly sampling events
conducted by EFRI contain only one groundwater sample and one trip blank for the
analysis of VOCs. The samples were analyzed on October 6, 2012.
Determination of a Corrective Action to Eliminate the Problem
The samples were analyzed outside of the required holding time due to laboratory error.
The samples were received with more than sufficient time to complete the analysis of two
samples within the required holding time. EFRI has determined this issue is related to the
laboratory and not due to the action or inaction of EFRI. In order to prevent the
recurrence of these types of laboratory errors which have increased in recent periods,
EFRI has decided to change analytical laboratories. EFRI has completed negotiations
with alternate Utah-certified laboratories and has changed laboratories for the fourth
quarter 2012 sampling event.
Assigning and Accepting Responsibility for Implementing the Corrective Action
It will be the joint responsibility of the Director, Compliance and the Quality Assurance
Manager to contract alternate Utah-certified laboratories.
Implementing the Corrective Action and Evaluating Effectiveness
EFRI has contacted the current laboratory to make them aware of the issues. In addition,
EFRI has contracted with alternate Utah-certified laboratories for the fourth quarter 2012
sampling event. The sample receipt data will be assessed as samples are received at the
new laboratories to determine if any further action is necessary.
Verifying That the Corrective Action Has Eliminated the Problem
Verification that samples are analyzed within required holding time, will occur during the
assessment of data collected from the fourth quarter 2012 sampling event.
5.0 TIME CONCENTRATION PLOTS
Time concentration plots for each monitoring well for the following constituents:
chloride, fluoride, sulfate, and uranium, are included under Tab I. All data points
collected to date are reflected on the plots.
Time concentration plots included in groundwater reports prior to and including first
quarter 2012 did not include data which were determined to be outliers using the
statistical methods used for the background determinations at the Mill. Based on
15
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Oroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 OW.doc
conversations with DRC, all data have been included in the current quarterly time
concentration plots. All future time concentration plots will include all data points.
6.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFRI has provided to the Executive Secretary electronic copies of all laboratory results
from groundwater quality monitoring conducted during the quarter in Comma Separated
Values ("CSV") format. A copy of the transmittal e-mail is included under Tab J.
16
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW.doc
I
7.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared'by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. on November 26,
2012.
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
By:
David . F yden und
Senior Vice Pres· dent, Regulatory Affairs and General Counsel
17
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW.doc
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted.
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are
significant pen a ties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and
r kno lng violations.
Davi
Senior Vice Presi ent, Regulatory Affairs and General Counsel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
18
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q3\3rd Qtr 2012 GW.doc
Tables
Table 1: Summary of Well Sampling for Q3 2012
.
Purpose for Sampling
Well Normal Frequency. this Quarter Sample Date .Date of Lab Report
. Quarterly Samples
MW-ll Quarterly Quarterly 7111/2012 8110/2012 [8/28/2012]
MW-14 Quarterly Quarterly 7/11/2012 8110/2012 [8/28/2012]
MW-25 Quarterly Quarterly 711012012 8110/2012 [8/28/2012]
MW-26 Quarterly Quarterly 7/1112012 8110/2012 [8/28/2012]
MW-26 resample* Quarterly Quarterly 8116/2012 8/30/2012
MW-30 Quarterly Quarterly 7110/2012 8110/2012 [8/28/2012]
MW-31 Quarterly Quarterly 7/912012 8110/2012 [8/28/2012]
MW-35 Quarterly Background 711012012 8/10/2012 [8/28/2012]
MW-36 Quarterly Background 711112012 8/10/2012 [8/28/2012]
MW-37 Quarterly Background 7/3012012 8/24/2012 [8114/2012]
MW-65 1 per Batch Duplicate of MW-26 711112012 8/10/2012 [8/28/2012]
MW-65 resample* 1 per Batch Duplicate of MW-26 8116/2012 8/30/2012
. Accelerated Samples
Accelerated Quarterly Samples
MW-2 Semi-annually Accelerated 7116/2012 8114/2012
MW-3 Semi-annually Accelerated 7118/2012 8114/2012
MW-3A Semi-annually Accelerated 711912012 8114/2012
MW-5 Semi-annually Accelerated 7116/2012 8114/2012
MW-12 Semi-annually Accelerated 711712012 8114/2012
MW-15 Semi -annually Accelerated 711712012 8114/2012
MW-18 Semi -annually Accelerated 7118/2012 8114/2012
MW-19 Semi-annually Accelerated 711912012 8114/2012
MW-23 Semi-annually Accelerated 7117/2012 8114/2012
MW-24 Semi -annually Accelerated 7118/2012 8/14/2012
MW-27 Semi -annually Accelerated 711612012 8114/2012
MW-28 Semi -annually Accelerated 7/1612012 8/14/2012
MW-28 Resample Semi-annually Accelerated 81112012 8/24/2012
MW-29 Semi-annually Accelerated 711012012 8/10/2012
MW-29 Resample Semi -annually Accelerated 81112012 8/24/2012
MW-32 Semi -annually Accelerated 7/912012 8/10/2012
MW-70 1 per Batch Duplicate of MW-03 711812012 8/14/2012
Accelerated August Monthly
MW-11 Monthly Accelerated 817/2012 915/2012
MW-14 Monthly Accelerated 81712012 91512012
MW-25 Monthly Accelerated 8/612012 9/5/2012
MW-26 Monthly Accelerated 8/8/2012 9/5/2012
MW-30 Monthly Accelerated 81712012 915/2012
MW-3l Monthly Accelerated 8/6/2012 9/5/2012
MW-35 Monthly Accelerated 8/8/2012 9/5/2012
MW-65 1 per Batch Duplicate of MW-14 817/2012 915/2012
Accelerated September Monthly
MW-ll Monthly Accelerated 9/1912012 lO/1712012
MW-14 Monthly Accelerated 911812012 lOI17120l2
MW-25 Monthly Accelerated 9/1812012 lOI17/2012
MW-26 Monthly Accelerated 911912012 lOI17/2012
MW-30 Monthly Accelerated 911912012 lO/17/2012
MW-31 Monthly Accelerated 9118/2012 lOI17/2012
MW-35 Monthly Accelerated 9/1912012 lOI17/20l2
MW-65 1 per Batch Duplicate ofMW-35 9/1912012 lOI17/2012
Notes:
Date in brackets depicts the date that tetrahydrofuran and tin were reported from American West Analytical Laboratories. All other VOCs and metals were
reported from Energy Laboratories.
* MW-26 and MW-65 were resampled for VOCs only due to poor samplelduplicate agreement.
Table 2
" " First Result Monitoriilg Well Constituent Exceeding GWCL GWCLin Exceeding the Routine Sample
(Water Class) 'Current,GWDP Frequency GWCL
Quarterly Wells Accelerated to MoniWy Samplingl
MW-11 (Class II) Manganese (ugIL) 131.29 134 Quarterly
MW-14 (Class Ill) Manganese (ugIL) 2230.30 2360 Quarterly
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 - 8.5 6.45 Quarterly
MW-25 (Class Ill) Uranium (ug/L) 6.5 6.57 Quarterly
MW -26 (Class Ill) Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) (mgIL) 0.62 1.3 Quarterly
Uranium (ugIL) 41.8 58.7 Quarterly
Chloroform (ug/L) 70 700 Quarterly
Chloride (mg/L) 58.31 72 Quarterly
Methylene Chloride (ug/L) 5 9.9 Ouarterly
Field pH (S.U.) 6.74 -8.5 6.59 Quarterly
MW-30 (Class II) Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) (mgIL) 2.5 16.1 Quarterly
Chloride (mgIL) 128 134 Quarterly
Uranium (ugIL) 8.32 9.83 Quarterly
Selenium (ugIL) 34 35.3 Quarterly
MW-31 (Class Ill) Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) (mgIL) 5 21.7 Quarterly
TDS (mgIL) 1320 1330 Quarterly
Sulfate (mgIL) 532 539 Quarterly
Selenium (ugIL) 71 74 Quarterly
Chloride (mglL) 143 145 Quarterly
MW-35 (Class II) Uranium (uglL) 7.5 21.7 Quarterly
Thallium (uglL) 0.5 1.14 Quarterly
Selenium (uglL) 12.5 19.7 Quarterly
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U (pCiIL) 3.75 4.5 Quarterly
Manganese (uglL) 200 369 Quarterly
Semi-Annual Wells Accelerated to Quarterly Samplingl
Monitoring Well Constituent Exceeding GWCL GWCLin First Result Sample
MW-2 (Class Ill) Gross Alpha minus Rn & U (pCiIL) 3.2 3.5 Semi-Annually
MW-3 (Class III) Selenium (ugIL) 37 37.2 Semi-Annually
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.14 (6.25) Semi-Annually
Fluoride (mgIL) 0.68 0.71 Semi-Annually
MW-3A (Class III) Field pH (S.U.) 6,5 - 8.5 6.23 (6.24) Semi-Annually
Sulfate (mg/l) 3640 3680 Semi-Annually
TDS (mg/L) 5805 5860 Semi-Annually
Selenium (ugIL) 89 94.8 Semi-Annually
MW-5 (Class II) Uranium (ugJLl 7.5 11.6 Semi-Annually
MW-12 (Class Ill) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.47 Semi-Annually
Selenium (ugIL) 25 25.7 Semi-Annually
MW-15 (Class III) Selenium (ugIL) 128.7 152 Semi-Annually
Iron (uglL) 81.7 137 Semi-Annually
MW-18 (Class Ill) Thallium (ugIL) 1.95 3.73 Semi-Annually
Sulfate (mgIL) 1938.9 1950 Semi-Annually
Field pH (S.U.) 6.25-8.5 6.2 Semi-Annually
TDS (mg/L) 3198.77 3280 Semi-Annually
MW-19 (Class Ill) Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) (mgIL) 2.83 4 Semi-Annually
Field pH (S.U.) 6.78-8.5 6.61 (6.66) Semi-Annually
MW -23 (Class III) Manganese (ug/L) 550 551 Semi-Annually
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.18 Semi-Annually
MW-24 (Class Ill) Cadmium (ugIL) 2.5 4.28 Semi-Annually
Thallium (ug/L) 1 1.3 Semi-Annually
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 - 8.5 5.91 (5:78) Semi-Annually
MW -27 (Class III) Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) (mgIL) 5.6 5.8 Semi-Annually
Chloride (mgIL) 38 42 Semi-Annually
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U (pCiIL) 2 2.4 Semi-Annually
Sulfate (mgIL) 462 469 Semi-Annually
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.39 Semi-Annually
TDS (mgIL) 1075 1160 Semi-Annually
MW -28 (Class Ill) Chloride (mgIL) 105 108 Semi-Annually
Manganese (ugIL) 1837 1850 Semi-Annually
Field pH (S.U.) 6.1-8.5 5.67 Semi-Annually
MW-29 (Class Ill) Field pH (S.U.) 6.46 - 8.5 6.17 Semi-Annually
Manganese (ugIL) 5624 6140 Semi-Annually
TDS (mgIL) 4400 4600 Semi-Annually
Iron (ugIL) 1869 3010 Semi-Annually
MW-32 (Class III) Gross Alpha minus Rn & U (pCiIL) 3.33 5.4 Semi-Annually
Field pH (S.U.) 6.4 -8.5 6.03 Semi-Annually
Notes:
I GWCL Values are taken from July 14,_2011 and August 24, 2012 y~rsion~ of the GWI?p.
sample period.
Accelerated Exceedance ' Start of Accelerated
Frequency Sample Period Monitoring , ,
Monthly Q12010 May 2010
Monthly Q22012 August 2012
Monthly Q12010 May 2010
Monthly Q32010 January 2011
Monthly Q12010 May 2010
Monthly Q12010 May 2010
Monthly Q12010 May 20 10
Monthly Q12010 May 2010
Monthly Q22010 June 2010
Monthly Q12010 May 2010
Monthly Q12010 May 2010
Monthly Q12011 May 2011
Monthly Q42011 March 2012
Monthly Q22010 July 2010
Monthly Q12010 May 2010
Monthly Q32010 January 2011
Monthly Q42010 March 2011
Monthly Q32012 December 2012
Monthly Q12011 May 2011
Monthly Q32011 July 2011
Monthly Q42011 July 2011
Monthly Q12012 June 2012
Monthly Q32011 Q42011
Monthly Q32011 July 2011
Accelerated Exceedance Start of Accelerated
Quarterly Q42010 Q12011
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q42010 Q12011
Ouarterly 042010 012011
Quarterly Q42010 Q12011
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22012 Q32012
Quarterly Q42011 Q12012
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q42011 Q12012
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q42011 012012
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q42010 Q12011
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q32011 Q42011
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22012 Q32012
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q42010 Q22011
Quarterly Q22012 Q32012
Quarterly Q22012 Q32012
Quarterly Q32011 Q42011
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
a e -xcee ances T bl 3 GWCLE d Th' dQ Ir uarter 2 012 4 under theAugust 2 ,201 2G WDP
~j i!iIIOoll' III, ,.,Q12010 Results ,'4l ,1Ili ff III Q2 2010 Results ·111
.. IIIIi !Ii Q3 2010 Results r<i
~ liS "II 101'" Q4 2010 Results 0 .1ilI1'll '" .J ... 'i, .. '"" "
Monitoring ~. :, I!i " . 111_' 1 0 .... ...
A:gusflbl0
:.'< • '!. ~
October:t o ." .. "II
Constituent Exceeding . GWCLin . Ql 2010 Sample Q12010 Q22010 Q22010 May 2010 o May, 2010 June 2010 June 2010 July 2010 July 2010 .~ October 2010 Q42010 December 2010 December 2010 Well (Water August 24, 2012 Monthly Monthly " Monthly Monthly Monthly . Monthl~ S'(onthly August 2010 Q32010 ~ Q32010 Monthly Q4 2010 . t~Mo thly Sample .~ . GWCL Date Result Sample Date : Result Monthly Result Sample Date Ii Result Monthly Sam Ie Sample Date '" Result Monthly Result Class) GWDP Sample Date Result Sample Dat: R~,u1t Sample Date Result Sample I?ate Date !II Result Date
'. I' ~ ~, 0
~ ,.; ,~ ,C" -11', II Required Quarterly Sampling Wells .... $;. ~, II II .... 1i'I.,III .. .11 ." <, ~
MW-11 (Class Manganese (ug/L) 131.29 2/10/10 134 4/28/10 137 5/24/10 122 6116/10 99 II) 7120110 123 8/25/10 138 9/8/10 128 10/20/10 141 11111110 133 12/15/10 158
MW-14 (Class Manganese (ug/L) 2230.30 2060 2070 NA NA NA NA 1920 NA 1980 NA
ill) 2/2/10 4/21/10 5/21/10 6/16/10 7120110 8125/10 9/8/10 10/20/10 11110/10 12/15/10 Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.45 6.29 6.36 6.45 7.19 6.48 6.51 6.60 6.37 6.47
MW-25 (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.53 7.2 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.58 NS NA 6.36 NS NA
ill) 2/26/2010 4/28/2010 9/8/2010 11110/10
Uranium 6.5 5.93 6.43 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.57 NS NA 5.89 NS NA
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.62 1.3 2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.4 (mg/L)
Uranium (ug/L) 41.8 58.7 66.7 37.4 36.6 34.4 71.8 72.7 37.5 30.4 29.6
Chloroform (ug/L) 70 700 1700 800 940 900 2800 2100 1000 1900 1400
MW-26 (Class Chloride (mg/L) 58.31 72 57 80 47 52 49 64 52 48 52
ill) 2/2/10 4/22110 5/21/10 6116110 7/21110 8116/10 9/26/10 10/20/10 11115/10 12/15110 Field pH (S.U.) 6.74 -8.5 6.59 7.18 6.36 6.98 6.45 6.39 6.60 6.61 6.49 6.45
Dichloromethane
(Methylene Chloride) 5 1 9.9 NR 2.2 12 24 45 5.5 16 1.2
(ug/L)
IDS (mg/L) 3284.19 3100 ~ 3280 NS NS NS NS 3440 NS 3140 NS
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 2.5 16.1 15.8 17 15.3 7/21110 16 8/24110 16 15 15 /5 16 (mg/L)
MW-30 (Class Chloride (mg/L) 128 127 97 NS NS NS NS NS NS III NS 126 NS
II) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 2/9/10 6.81 4/27110 6.55 5/21/10 6.62 6115/10 7.47 7/21/2010 6.82 8/24/10 6.73 9/14/10 6.80 10/19/10 6.77 1119/10 6.75 12/14/10 6.65
Uranium (ug/L) 8.32 6.82 6.82 NS NS NS NS NS NS 7.10 NS 6.64 NS
Selenium (ug/L) 34 32 35.3 NS NS 7/27/10 33.5 8124/10 35.6 32.6 32.4 32.2 30.5
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 5 21.7 22.5 5/21/10 23 6115/10 21.1 7/21/10 20 8/24110 22 21 10/19/10 20 20 20 (mg/L)
IDS (mg/L) 1320 1150 1220 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 1330 NS NA 1320 NS
MW-31 (Class Chloride (mg/L) 143 2/9110 128 128 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 139 NS NA 138 NS
ill) Selenium (ug/L) 71 4/20/10 9/13/10 1119/10 12/14/10 60.8 59.6 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 64.4 NS NA 60 NS
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 . 6.96 7.38 5/21/10 6.95 6115110 7.01 7121/10 7.8 8124/10 7.1 7.66 10/19/10 6.92 6.98 6.95
Sulfate (mg/L) .532 507 522 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 527 NS NA 539 NS
Manganese (ug/L) 200 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 698 NS NA
Thallium (ug/l) 0.5 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 1.14 NS NA
MW-35 (Class Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 3.75 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NS 2.6 NS NA II) (pCi/L) NA NS NA NS NA NA 11130/10
Selenium (ug/L) 12.5 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA ND NS NA
Uranium (ug/L) 7.5 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 27.2 NS NA
'" (f; " 'Required Semi-Annual Sampling Wells II II III ", ..
i '"" " MW-2 (Class Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 3.2 NS NA 1.2 NS NA NS 3.5 NS ill) (pCi/L) NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NA
Selenium (ug/L) 37 MW-3 (Class NS NA 37.2 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 35.5 NS NA 38.8 NS NA
ill) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 5/3/10 6.14 (6.25) NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9/20/10 6.39 NS NA 11/19/10 6.35 NS NA
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.68 NS NA 0.71 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 0.63 NS NA 0.77 NS NA
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 6.23 (6.24) NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.42 NS NA 6.21 NS NA MW-3A (Class
ill) Sulfate (mg/L) 3640 NS NA 5/4/10 3680 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9/21110 3630 NS NA 11122/10 3850 NS NA
IDS (mg/L) 5805 NS NA 5860 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 5470 NS NA 5330 NS NA
Selenium (ug/L) 89 NS NA 81.4 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NS NA 94.8 NS NA
MW-5 (Class Uranium (ug/L) 7.5 NS NA II) 4/26/10 0.39 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 11111/10 11.6 NS NA
MW-12 (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.S NS NA 7.16 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.62 NS NA 6.47 NS NA
ill) Selenium (ug/L) 25 NS 4/27/10 9/20/10 11119/10 NA 25.7 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 31.9 NS NA 27.6 NS NA
MW-15 (Class Selenium (ug/L) 128.7 NS NA 100 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NA NS NA 99.5 NS NA
ill) 4/21110 NS 11111110 Iron (ug/L) 81.7 NS NA ND NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NA NS NA ND NS NA
Thallium (ug/l) 1.95 NS NA 3.73 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 3.64 NS NA 3.57 NS NA
MW-18 (Class
ill) Sulfate (mg/L) 1938.9 NS NA 5/4110 1950 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9115/10 1930 NS NA 11118/10 1910 NS NA
Field pH (S.U.) 6.25-8.5 NS NA 6.2 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 7.23 NS NA 6.37 NS NA
IDS (mg/L) 3198.77 NS NA 3280 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 3190 NS NA 3030 NS NA
o _"" '" '" ..... '1:1 ~ ,: Q1 2010 Results ~JJ
to! ~
Monitoring Constituent .Exceeding GWCLin Well (Water Ql Sample Date GWCE Current GWDP Class)
!II •
MW-19 (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.78-8.5
Ill)
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N)
(mg/L) 2.83
MW-23 (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5
Ill) Manganese (ug/L) 550
Cadmium (ug/L) 2.5 MW-24 (Class Thallium (ug/L) 1 Ill)
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 5.6 (mg/L)
Chloride (mg/L) 38
MW-27 (Class Sulfate (mg/L) 462
Ill) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5-8.5
IDS (mg/L) 1075
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 2 (pCi/L)
Chloride (mg/L) 105
MW-28 (Class Manganese (ug/L) 1837
Ill)
Field pH (S.U.) 6.1 -8.5
Iron (ug/L) 1869
Manganese (ug/L) 5624 MW-29 (Class IDS (mg/L) 4400 Ill)
Field pH (S.U.) 6.46 -8.5
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 3.33 MW-32 (Class (pCi/L)
Ill)
Field pH (S.U.) 6.4 -8.5
Notes:
GWCL values are taken from February 15, 2011 version of GWDP.
NS = Not Required and Not Sampled
NR = Required and Not Reported
NA = Not Applicable
Exceedances are shown in yellow
.111
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Values in () parentheses are the field pH measurements for the resampled analyses.
..
Ql Result Ii
~ ...
J'
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
~~-.ti! .Ii "Q2 2010 ResultS "'!" W" 51. I?lI IJIEI. .. .. I~ II.lr '" I"
Q2Sample " ~ May Monthly May June Monthly'" June Monthly , July, Monthly July Monthly I:!i.Q2Result .'" Monthly Date Sample Date I· Sample Date Result Sample Date Result Result iii
, .. ... Kjii
'iI' ~ ~ . II Required Semi-Annual Sampling Wells, continued -~ ',~.
6.61 (6.66) NS NA NS NA NS NA
5/4/10
2.6 NS NA NS NA NS NA
4/22/10 6.18 NS NA NS NA NS NA
184 NS NA NS NA NS NA
4.28 NS NA NS NA NS NA
5/6/10 1.3 NS NA NS NA NS NA
5.91 (5.78) NS NA NS NA NS NA
5.8 NS NA NS NA NS NA
42 NS NA NS NA NS NA
469 NS NA NS NA NS NA
5/3/10 6.78 NS NA NS NA NS NA
1160 NS NA NS NA NS NA
1.6 NS NA NS NA NS NA
108 NS NA NS NA NS NA
1550 NS NA 4/19/10 NS NA NS NA
5.67 NS NA NS NA NS NA
1630 NS NA NS NA NS NA
4820 NS NA NS NA NS NA
4/27110 4400 NS NA NS NA NS NA
6.82 NS NA NS NA NS NA
4.5 NS NA NS NA NS NA
4120110
6.03 NS NA NS NA NS NA
suant to the October 26, 2011 DRC letter gross alpha monitoring in MW -26 reterned to the routine frquency of quarteFly. These samples were inadvertantly collected and are for information only.
Q3t~010 Resuits c;!1~'. III !t,,~ '" '-, PO 3' .. "!' ~ ., .... 1'1: Q4 2010 Results ,.-~ -'Ill' '-." 1ljI'
~ ... n ~ " ",
I· ,~ August August Monthly .Q3Sample October III October. Q4Sample ' December ." 1111 December
Monthly Q3Resuit Monthly Sample Monthly Q4'Resuit Monthly Sample Result 1'1' Date Result Date Date Monthly Result Sample Date '. Date I, 1\ ~ • ~ .1'1:0 .111 ~ ~ "'" !D
!II I!I . ~ ." ..
NS NA 6.93 NS NA 6.8 NS NA
9115/10 11/18/10
NS NA NS NA NA 2,4 NS NA
NS NA 9/14/10 7.05 NS NA 6.44 NS NA 11/22110
NS NA NS NS NA 65 NS NA
NS NA 5.06 NS NA 3.22 NS NA
NS NA 9121/10 1.57 NS NA 11/17/10 1.09 NS NA
NS NA 6.64 NS NA 6.1 NS NA
NS NA 5.9 NS NA 5.7 NS NA
NS NA 42 NS NA 45 NS NA
NS NA 461 NS NA 452 NS NA
NS NA 9114110 7.68 NS NA 11112110 6.89 NS NA
NS NA 1060 NS NA 1110 NS NA
NS NA NA NS NA 2.4 NS NA
NS NA 106 NS NA 107 NS NA
NS NA NA NS NA 1510 NS NA 9/14/10 11/12/10
NS NA 5.91 NS NA 5.72 NS NA
NS NA NS NA 1490 NS NA
NS NA .NS NA 4890 NS NA
NS NA NS NA NS NA 1119/10 4390 NS NA
NS NA NS NA 6.17 NS NA
NS NA 2.9 NS NA 8.8 NS NA
9/13/10 11/10110
NS NA 6.33 NS NA 6.05 NS NA
a e -xcee ances or II' uarter un ert e ugus , lit. .; . " jl!
~. Q120U Results.'" i1! ,. ·M 'is Q2,2011 Results: Il< j'l! ... .' ,.coQ3~I.l11Results .'" " ~. Q4 2011 Res.ults· '. "'-,:;,:, -" ".
T bl 3 GWCLE d f Th' d Q 2012 d h A t 24 2012 GWDP
s .... ~ .. March . . .. ' ~eptember . September '
;... ..' . December . Monitoring. Con~tituei1t Exceeding GWCJi,iIi January 20U l'd anual'Y 2011' . ·Q12011 I ~ March 2011 Q220H~ May, 2011 'May 2oi1 JuIie2011 . June 2011 ,; July-20ll '. July 20ft . Q32011 Q;2011 November NovemtJer ' December
Well (Water August 24, 'Monthly Monthly Sainple Sample Q'I: 2011 Monthly' 2011 Q220U Monthly . Monthly' Sample 2011 '. 2011 Monthly . Q42011 Q420n ~01l Monthly 2011 Monthly 2011 Monthly 2011
GWCL . Result MonthlY Sample Result · Monthly Monthly Monthly . Monthly Result Monthly Sample Date Result ,Monthly I'" 'Class) ~012,GWDP Sample Date ·Result Daie ' . .. Sample Date Date '. . 'oJ. Sample Date,' Result Sample Date' . Result Sample Date Result ; Date ' ,. SampJe Date Result ~ Sample' Date Result Sample Date Result . Result , . .:;' ,. :
. ~
. .
'" .Required Quarterly Sampling Wells , "". '.' ", .
MW-11 Manganese (uglL) 131.29 7/6/2011 8/3/2011 118 91712011 106 10/4/2011 112 1119/2011 105 12114/2011 100 (Class II) 1/11111 121 2/2/11 145 3115/11 68 4/4/2011 148 5/10/2011 170 6/15/2011 121 151 8/30/11
MW-14 Manganese (uglL) 2230.30 NA 2020 NA 2140 NA NA NA 1990 NA 1960 NA NA
(Class ill) 1/11111 217111 3/14/11 4/412011 5/10/2011 6/15/2011 7/512011 8/3/2011 6.23 9/8/2011 1014/2011 1119/2011 12112/2011 Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.37 6.22 6.76 6.63 6.37 5.83 6.4 6.50 6.71 (6.82) 6.63 6.84 (6.41)
MW-25 Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.44 6.66 6.79 6.7 6.1 5.77 6.29 8/3/2011 6.42 6.54 6.6 6.51 6.87
(Class ill) 1/11/11 2/2/11 3/15/11 4/412011 5/1112011 6/20/2011 7/612011 8/30/11 (6.54) 91712011 10/4/2011 111912011 1212/2011
Uranium 6.5 7.02 4.77 6.8 5.56 6.72 7.06 6.74 8/312011 6.37 5.96 5.27 6.56 6.1
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.62 0.2 0.25 0.6 0.8 0.4 (mglL) 0.3 0.9 0.6 2.4 0.9 1.3 2.3
Uranium (uglL) 41.8 32 69.3 31.8 60.2 57.4 18.5 57.1 19.0 56.1 58.9 55.6 57
Chloroform (uglL) 70 800 730 1200 390 1900 730 300 1000 1300 440 1200 1400
MW-26 Chloride (mglL) 58.31 52 59 64 64 54 39 64 8/3/2011 60 66 61 55 62
(Class ill) 1/12/11 2116/11 3/15/11 411/2011 5110/2011 6/20/2011 7/612011 6.07 91712011 10112/2011 111912011 12/14/2011 Field pH (S.U.) 6.74 -8.5 6.83 6.06 6.89 6.22 6.43 6.52 6.35 8/30111 6.71 6.82 6.75 7.1 (6.58)
Dieh loromethane
(Methylene Chloride) 5 <1.0 10 14 3.1 20 7 2.4 10 7.9 2.6 8.9 11
(uglL)
IDS (mglL) 3284.19 3100 3270 3140 3310 3140 3020 3270 3190 3200 3190 3220 3160
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 2.5 15 16 17 16 16 (mglL) 17 17 14 16 16 16 16
MW-30 Chloride (mglL) 128 NS 134 NS 134 128 127 127 126 145 129 122 124
(Class II) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 1110/11 6.65 2/1111 6.96 3/14/11 7.10 411112011 6.83 5/10/2011 6.7 6120/2011 5.66 7/5/2011 6.65 8/3/2011 6.61 91712011 6.80 10/4/2011 6.96 (6.73) 1118/2011 6.83 12/1212011 7.14
Uranium (uglL) 8.32 NS 5.97 NS 6.49 NS NS NS 8 NS 9.83 NS NS
Selenium (uglL) 34 36.2 34.7 34 44.4 38.3 38.7 32.4 39.7 32.4 36.6 36.8 38
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 5 19 (mglL) 21 22 21 20 22 22 20 21 21 21 21
IDS (mglL) 1320 1240 1220 1250 1370 1290 1330 1280 1300 1300 1320 1290 1330
MW-31 Chloride (mglL) 143 NS 145 NS 143 143 145 148 148 148 145 1118/2011 145 12/12/2011 148
(Class ill) 1110111 2/1111 3/14111 4/112011 5/10/2011 6/20/2011 7/512011 8/2/2011 9/6/2011 10/3/2011 NS Selenium (uglL) 71 NS 64.6 NS 65.2 NS NS NS 66.2 NS 68.8 NS
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.65 7.21 7.43 7.01 6.73 6.16 6.64 6.67 7.03 7.28 (7.34) 7.01 7.46
Sulfate (mglL) 532 NS 538 531 503 512 540 532 537 541 539 552 530
Manganese (uglL) 200 NS NA 248 NS NA 369 NS NA NS NA 348 267 270 271 283 247
Thallium (ugll) 0.5 NS NA <0.50 NS NA <0.50 NS NA NS NA NS 0.52 NS 0.57 <0.50 0.63
MW-35 Gross Alpha minus Rn 3.75 NS 4.5 NS 10/3/11 4.4 11/8/2011 4.7 12114/11 4.2 (Class II) & U (pCilL) NA 2/15/11 2.6 NS NA 6nl2011 3.7 NS NA NS NA 7/20/11 NS 8/30/2011 917111
Selenium (uglL) 12.5 NS NA ND NS NA ND NS NA NS NA NA 9.3 NA 10.5 NA NA
Uranium (ug/L) 7.5 NS NA 12.7 NS NA 21.7 NS NA NS NA 24.2 18.3 22.3 20.1 24 23.6
.. ~ . 'S' Required Semi-Annual Sampling Wells " t,' 0' .
i· , ~ . "
MW-2 (Class Gross Alpha minus Rn 3.2 NS NA 1.1 NS NA 4112/2011 1.2 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8/8/2011 0.5 NS NA 10/5/2011 1.3 NS NA NS NA ill) & U (oCilL)
MW-3 (Class
Selenium (ug/L) 37 NS NA 40.5 NS NA 45.4 NS NA NS NA NS NA 46 NS NA 46.7 NS NA NS NA
ill) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 2/15/11 6.09 NS NA 4/1312011 6.46 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8110/2011 6.32 NS NA 1011012011 6.53 (6.83) NS NA NS NA
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.68 NS NA 0.69 NS NA 0.68 NS NA NS NA NS NA 0.96 NS NA 0.91 NS NA NS NA
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 6.05 MW-3A NS NA 6.58 NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.19 NS NA 6.5 (6.92) NS NA NS NA
(Class ill) Sulfate (mg/L) 3640 NS NA 2/16/11 3730 NS NA 4/13/2011 3350 NS NA NS NA NS NA 811112011 3560 NS NA 10/1112011 3750 NS NA NS NA
IDS (mglL) 5805 NS NA 5770 NS NA 5720 NS NA NS NA NS NA 5810 NS NA 5630 NS NA NS NA
Selenium (ug/L) 89 NS NA 99 NS NA 85.8 NS NA NS NA NS NA 88.5 NS NA 95 NS NA NS NA
MW-5 (Class Uranium (ug/L) 7.5 NS NA 2114/11 II) 29.5 NS NA 4112/2011 7.16 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8/9/2011 0.5 NS NA 10/10/2011 4.52 NS NA NS NA
MW-12 Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 6.43 NS NA 6.67 NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.13 NS NA 6.7 (6.97) NS NA NS NA
(Class ill) 2/15/11 4/512011 8/9/2011 1016/2011 Selenium (ug/L) 25 NS NA 39 NS NA 21.7 NS NA NS NA NS NA 25.4 NS NA 35.4 NS NA NS NA
MW-15 Selenium (ug/L) 128.7 NS NA NA NS NA 116 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 112 NS NA NS NA
(Class ill) NS 4112/2011 10/10/2011 Iron (uglL) 81.7 NS NA NA NS NA <0.50 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 137 NS NA NS NA
Thallium (ugfl) 1.95 NS NA 3.49 NS NA 3.74 NS NA NS NA NS NA 4.0 3.39 NS NA 3.83 NS NA NS NA
MW-1 8
(Class ill) Sulfate (mglL) 1938.9 NS NA 2/15111 1770 NS NA 4/6/2011 1780 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8/10/2011 1910 NS NA 10/1112011 2020 NS NA NS NA
Field pH (S.U.) 6.25-8.5 9/21111 5.95 NA 6.55 (6.63) NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.27 NS NA 6.71 NS NA NS NA NS NA {Ii 1m NS
IDS (mg/L) 3198.77 NS NA 3250 NS NA 3250 NS NA NS~ NA NS NA 3190 NS NA 3220 NS NA NS NA
'!Iii, p~" ,', ',,' -,~ '&'. "
~
"', ,,' I,"
,Monitoring Constituent ~xc~eding, GWCLin January 20i I,
,WeD (Water-Current Monthly GWCL 'x , ,Clas~) GWDP Sample' Date
, ,
: ",-: l\l
MW-19 Field pH (S.U.) 6.78-8.5 NS
(Class ill)
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 2.83 NS (mg/L)
MW-23 Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS
(Class ill) Manganese (ug/L) 550 NS
Cadmium (ug/L) 2.5 NS MW-24 Thallium (ug/L) (Class ill) 1 NS
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 5.6 NS (mg/L)
Chloride (mg/L) 38 NS
MW-27 Sulfate (mg/L) 462 NS
(Class ill) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5-8.5 NS
IDS (mg/L) 1075 NS
Gross Alpha minus Rn 2 NS & U (pCi/L)
Chloride (mg/L) 105 NS
MW-28 Manganese (ug/L) 1837 NS
(Class ill)
Field pH (S.u.) 6.1 -8.5 NS
Iron (ug/L) 1869 NS
Manganese (ug/L) 5624 NS MW-29 IDS (mg/L) 4400 NS (Class ill)
Field pH (S.U.) 6.46 -8.5 NS
Gross Alpha minus Rn 3.33 NS MW-32 & U (pCiIL)
(Class ill)
Field pH (S.U.) 6.4 -8.5 NS
Notes:
GWCL values are taken from July 14, 2011 version of GWDP.
NS = Not Required and Not Sampled
NR = Required and Not Reported
NA = Not Applicable
" ':. "' Q;J. 2011 Results , ,iI'! ' '0 • ~' ,
'1!l; " ,.
c, -" .:
; . " M'llrch 2011 ';;March January 2011, Qi 2011 , ' Q22011
Monthly Sample Sample Q12011 Monthly .. 20U Sample ,Res~lt M~Iithly. Result Date. Sample Date Date , Result '-' ..::. "
,( F ' ,.
NA 6.78 NS NA
2/2112011 4/5/2011
NA NS NS NA
NA 6.13 NS NA 2/9/2011 4/5/2011 NA NS NS NA
NA 2.78 NS NA
NA 2/10/2011 1.42 NS NA 4/5/2011
NA 5.73 NS NA
NA 6 NS NA
NA 46 NS NA
NA 455 NS NA
NA 2/9/2011 6.71 NS NA 4/5/2011
NA 1090 NS NA
NA 0.7 NS NA
NA 114 NS NA
NA NA NS NA 2/14/2011 4/11/2011
NA 5.69 NS NA
NA NS NA NS NA
NA NS NA NS NA
NA NS NA NS NA 4/18/2011
NA NS NA NS NA
NA 1.5 NS NA
2/9/2011 4/112011
NA 5.99 NS NA
'1.:. . ,'!'Q2 20il Results . ' , ",' ," Q3 2011 Results 1iilI" , )4 ' " }i. Q4 2011 Results ~, .,3 ", '.0" ~, '. .1L-'" ;:; o ' ""-'" "11:! , I? ~v ' ji!I j-ifI ,
Q2201t
gSeptember ' ' December ' J" May 2011 ,May 2011 Jun,e20lh j,une20H ' July 2Qll July ~OU, Q32011 September " Q42011 '~ovember November , December , 2011 -Monthly ' Monthly, Monthly ,Monthly , MOJIthly , ' Monthly. Sample Q32011 2Q11 " 2011 'Monthly Q42011 2011 Monthly 2011 Monthly 2011 Monthly , .Result , Result Monthly ' SlJmpleDate Result Monthly Sample Date, Re'sult ' Sample Date Resuit, , Sample Date, Result . Date ' Result ' Sample Date Result Sample Date Sample Date Result
, "" ' I;,. , ,'. ~ -'S', -(,
"
c' .. "
, '" Required Semi~Arinual Sampling Welis;continued ,,'" . t " ' " --",
7.03 NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.65 NS NA 6.88 (7.02) NS NA NS NA
7/20/3011 1011212011
2.6 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NS NA 4.0 NS NA NS NA
7.14 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8/4/2011 6.38 NS NA 6.56 (6.77) NS NA NS NA 10/6/2011
32 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NS NA 551 NS NA NS NA
2.61 NS NA NS NA NS NA 1.46 NS NA 1.78 NS NA NS NA
1.07 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8/4/2011 <0.50 NS NA 10/ll/2011 0.62 NS NA NS NA
6.12 NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.45 NS NA 6.44 NS NA NS NA
6.4 NS NA NS NA NS NA 6 NS NA 6.3 NS NA NS NA
43 NS NA NS NA NS NA 43 NS NA 44 NS NA NS NA
442 NS NA NS NA NS NA 424 NS NA 456 NS NA NS NA
6.79 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8/8/2011 6.39 NS NA 10/5/2011 7.17 (7.24) NS NA NS NA
1190 NS NA NS NA NS NA 1090 NS NA 1110 NS NA NS NA
1.1 NS NA NS NA NS NA 0.8 NS NA 1.5 NS NA NS NA
109 NS NA NS NA NS NA 105 NS NA 143 NS NA NS NA
1690 NS NA NS NA NS NA NA NS NA 1540 NS NA NS NA 8/8/2011 1015/2011
6.01 NS NA NS NA NS NA 5.78 NS NA 6.07 (6.11 ) NS NA NS NA
3010 NS NA NS NA NS NA 1080 NS NA 1220 NS NA NS NA
4900 NS NA NS NA NS NA NA NS NA 4800 NS NA NS NA
4080 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8/9/2011 NA NS NA 10/512011 4280 NS NA NS NA
6.45 NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.20 NS NA 6.52 NS NA NS NA
4.6 NS NA NS NA NS NA 1.9 NS NA 3.7 NS NA NS NA 8/212011
8130111 10/3/2011
6.14 NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.10 NS NA 6.35 NS NA NS NA (6.20)
a e -xcee ances or Ir uarter un er t e ugust , T bl 3 GWCLE d f ThO dQ 2012 d h A 242012GWDP
Ql 2012 Results Q2 2012 Results Q3 2012 Results -,
January 2012 March 2012 April 2012 June 2012 June 2012 August August September September
Monitoring Well Constituent GWCL in August January 2012 Q1 2012 Sample March 2012 April 2012 Monthly Q22012 Q22012 Q32012 Q32012 2012 2012 2012 2012 Sample
(Water Class) Exceeding GWCL 24, 2012 GWDP Monthly Sample Monthly Result Date Q1 2012 Result Monthly Sample Monthly Result Monthly Result Sample Date Result Monthly Monthly Sample Date Result Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Frequency Date Date Sample Date Sample Date Result Sample Result Sample Result
~ Required Quarterly Sampling Wells ~
MW-11 (Class II) Manganese (ug/L) 131.29 1126/2012 102 2/13/2012 154 3/13/2012 121 4/10/2012 132 5/8/2012 127 6/19/2012 122 7/11/2012 135 81712012 166 9/19/2012 130 Quarterly
Manganese (ug/L) 2230.30 NA 1790 NA NA 2360 NA 2100 2300 2140 Quarterly
MW-14 (Class ill) 1124/2012 2/2112012 3114/2012 4/12/2012 5/9/2012 6/19/2012 7/11/2012 81712012 9/1812012
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.36 6.57 6.51 6.97 6.73 6.90 6.89 6.58 7.08 Quarterly
MW-25 (Class ill) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.63 6.83 6.55 6.58 6.73 6.99 6.88 6.55 6.54 Quarterly 1/2512012 211412012 3114/2012 4/9/2012 5/2/2012 6/18/2012 711012012 816/2012 9/18/2012
Uranium 6.5 6.6 6.5 6.93 6.52 5.90 7.6 6.45 6.72 6.01 Quarterly
Nitrate + Nitrite (as 0.62 1.9 211512012 1.2 3 3.4 2.9 2.3 1.9 1.6 1.8 Quarterly N) (mg/L) 7/11/2012
Uranium (ug/L) 41.8 64.6 2/2112012 59.4 31.2 42.2 18.2 66.0 28.4 67.4 64.9 Quarterly
Chloroform (ug/L) 70 1900 3300 2900 2900 1700 2400 8/16/2012 970 2200 2300 Quarterly
Chloride (mg/L) 2115/2012 58.31 68 40 74 82 51712012 74 85 711112012 78 78 67 Quarterly
MW -26 (Class ill) 1125/2012 2115/20122/2112012 3/14/2012 4/1112012 6119/2012 7/11/2012 7.10 8/812012 9119/2012 Field pH (S.U.) 6.74 -8.5 6.59 6.72 (6.91) (6.71) 6.39 6.88 6/26/2012 7.00 (7.01) 7.00 6.60 7.40 Quarterly 3/8/2012 8/16/2012 (6.80)
Dichloromethane
(Methylene Chloride) 5 13 24 27 20 10 16 8116/2012 4.9 17 9.8 Quarterly
(ug/L) 2/15/2012
IDS (mg/L) 3284.19 3250 3150 3220 3140 3240 3200 7/11/2012 3060 3210 NS Quarterly
Nitrate + Nitrite (as 2.5 17 17 18 17 16 15 17 18 16 Quarterly N) (mg/L)
Chloride (mg/L) 128 1124/2012 124 126 128 128 124 131 128 139 130 Quarterly
MW-30 (Class II) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.52 2114/2012 7.12 3114/2012 6.86 4/10/2012 7.66 5/2/2012 6.95 6118/2012 7.10 7110/2012 7.25 81712012 6.95 9/19/2012 7.85 Quarterly
Uranium (ug/L) 8.32 NS NA 7.42 8.38 7.84 6.81 7.8 7.64 8.04 7.67 Quarterly
Selenium (ug/L) 34 1124/2012 33.3 35 39.5 39.1 32.3 37 38.5 38.4 41.9 Quarterly
Nitrate + Nitrite (as 5 21 21 22 21 20 21.6 21 21 21 Quarterly N) (mg/L)
IDS (mgIL) 1320 1360 1240 1400 1380 1410 1460 1400 1400 1460 Quarterly
MW-31 (Class ill) Chloride (mg/L) 143 155 150 152 160 151 6/18/2012 138 161 175 911812012 172 Quarterly
Selenium (ug/L) 1124/2012 2/1312012 3/13/2012 41912012 5/2/2012 6/29/2012 7/9/2012 8/6/2012 NS NS Quarterly 71 NS 67.8 NS NS 70.2 NS 74
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.78 7.37 7.13 7.14 7.19 7.28 7.53 6.96 7.10 Quarterly 7.63
Sulfate (mg/L) 532 539 538 517 547 532 497 529 571 561 Quarterly
Manganese (ug/L) 200 264 253 269 277 258 304 272 273 283 Quarterly
Thallium (ug/l) 0.5 <0.50 0.65 0.71 0.59 0.66 <0.50 0.57 0.61 0.54 Quarterly
1124/2012 3/13/12
MW-35 (Class II) Gross Alpha minus 3.75 6.5 2/14/12 4.1 6.2 411012012 4.1 5/2/2012 4.5 6/19/2012 4.9 7/1012012 3.5 8/8/2012 4.2 9/19/2012 5.4 Quarterly Rn & U (pCi/L)
Selenium (ug/L) 12.5 NS NA 19.7 NS NA NS 11.4 7.0 15.9 18.8 8.2 Quarterly
Uranium (ug/L) 7.5 1124/2012 16.1 24.7 3/13112 24.9 22.4 22.2 22.5 24.5 26.2 22.9 Quarterly
Required Semi-Annual Sampling Wells
MW-2 (Class ill) Gross Alpha minus 3.2 NS NA 2/22/2012 0.6 NS NA NS NA 5/9/2012 0.6 NS NA 7/16/2012 0.9 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually Rn & U (pCi/L)
Selenium (ug/L) 37 NS NA 43.1 NS NA NS NA 52.8 NS NA 51.1 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
MW-3 (Class ill) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 - 8.5 NS NA 2/29/2012 6.63 NS NA NS NA 5/14/2012 6.67 NS NA 711812012 6.99 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.68 NS NA 0.86 NS NA NS NA 1.04 NS NA 0.96 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 6.46 NS NA NS NA 6.68 NS NA 7.01 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
MW-3A (Class ill) Sulfate (mgIL) 3640 NS NA 3/112012 3020 NS NA NS NA 5/15/2012 3220 NS NA 7/19/2012 3700 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
IDS (mg/L) 5805 NS NA 5690 NS NA NS NA 5730 NS NA 5720 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
Selenium (ug/L) 89 NS NA 65.8 NS NA NS NA 85.1 NS NA 99.3 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
MW-5 (Class II) Uranium (ug/L) 7.5 NS NA 2/28/2012 18.6 NS NA NS NA 5/9/2012 1.23 NS NA 7/16/2012 0.75 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
MW-12 (Class ill) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 - 8.5 NS NA 6.81 NS NA NS NA 6.91 NS NA 6.98 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
Selenium (ugIL) 2/29/2012 5/1012012 7/17/2012 25 NS NA 27.2 NS NA NS NA 19.6 NS NA 20.7 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
MW-15 (Class ill) Selenium (ugIL) 128.7 NS NA NA NS NA NS NA 152 NS NA 120 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
2/22/2012 5/912012 7/17/2012 Iron (ug/L) 81.7 NS NA <30 NS NA NS NA <30 NS NA <30 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
Thallium (ug/l) 1.95 NS NA 3.63 NS NA NS NA 3.51 NS NA 3.73 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
MW-18 (Class ill) Sulfate (mg/L) 1938.9 NS NA 2/27/2012 1920 NS NA NS NA 4/30/2012 1790 NS NA 7/18/2012 1900 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
Field pH (S.U.) 6.25-8.5 NS NA 6.6 NS NA NS NA 6.59 NS NA 6.64 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
IDS (mg/L) 3198.77 NS NA 3230 NS NA NS NA 3280 NS NA 3220 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
~ Ql 2012 Results " -~
January 2012 March 2012 April 2012 Monitoring Well Constituent GWCL in Current January 2012 Q1 2012 Sample March 2012 April 2012 Monthly
(Water Class) Exceeding GWCL GWDP Monthly Sample Monthly Result Date Q1 2012 Result Monthly Sample Monthly Result Monthly Result Date Date Sample Date
Required Semi-Annual Sampling Wells, continued
MW-19 (Class ill) Field pH (S.U.) 6.78-8.5
Nitrate + Nitrite (as
N) (mg/L) 2.83
MW-23 (Class ill) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 - 8.5
Manganese (ug/L) 550
Cadmium (ug/L) 2.5
MW -24 (Class ill) Thallium (ug/L) 1
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5
Nitrate + Nitrite (as 5.6 N) (mg/L)
Chloride (mg/L) 38
MW-27 (Class ill) Sulfate (mg/L) 462
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5-8.5
IDS (mg/L) 1075
Gross Alpha minus 2 Rn & U (pCi/L)
Chloride (mg/L) 105
MW-28 (Class ill) Manganese (ug/L) 1837
Field pH (S.U.) 6.1 -8.5
Iron (ug/L) 1869
Manganese (ug/L) 5624
MW-29 (Class ill) IDS (mg/L) 4400
Field pH (S.U.) 6.46-8.5
Gross Alpha minus 3.33
MW-32 (Class ill) Rn & U (pCi/L)
Field pH (S.U.) 6.4 -8.5
Notes:
GWCL values are taken from February 15, 2011 version of GWDP.
NS = Not Required and Not Sampled
NR = Required and Not Reported
NA = Not Applicable
Exceedances are shown in yellow
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Values in () parentheses are the field pH measurements for the resampled analyses.
NA 6.83 NS
2/28/2012
NA 3.9 NS
NA 2/20/2012 6.61 NS
NA 51 NS
NA 2.25 NS
NA 2/23/2012 0.96 NS
NA 6.03 NS
NA 6.4 NS
NA 45 NS
NA 451 NS
NA 2/28/2012 7.24 NS
NA 1140 NS
NA 2.3 NS
NA 109 NS
NA NA NS 2/28/2012
NA 6.22 NS
NA 1310 NS
NA NA NS
NA 2/22/2012 NA NS
NA 7.12 NS
NA l.8 NS
212112012
NA 6.57 NS
rsuant to the August 28,2012 DRC letter, IDS monitoring in MW-26 returned to the routine frquency of quarterly. No sample was required for this sampling eriod.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
rsuant to the Au ust 28, 2012 DRC letter field pH will no longer be tracked on the exceedance sheet after the 3rd quarter 2012 because 8 or more consecutive results are within the GWCL limits.
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
Q2 2012 Results ,," Q3 2012 Results w
August September
June 2012 June 2012 2012 August 2012 September
Q22012 Q22012 Q32012 Q32012 2012 2012 Sample
Sample Date Result Monthly Monthly Sample Date Result Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Frequency Sample Date Result Sample Result Sample Result Date Date
6.86 NS NA 7.21 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
511612012 7/1912012
3.7 NS NA 4 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
6.74 NS NA 7.10 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
5/16/2012 7117/2012
49 NS NA 117 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
2.01 NS NA 4.7 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
5/1012012 0.74 NS NA 7/18/2012 1.36 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
6.21 NS NA 6.45 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
6.2 NS NA 6.7 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
46 NS NA 47 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
446 NS NA 453 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
5/112012 7.03 NS NA 7/16/2012 7.40 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
1170 NS NA 1150 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
0.8 NS NA l.2 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
114 NS NA 7116/2012 105 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
1850 NS NA 8/112012 1660 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
5/812012
6.15 NS NA 7/16/2012 6.38 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually 8/112012 (5.81)
1400 NS NA 7116/2012 1270 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
6140 NS NA 8/112012 5190 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
5/812012 4600 NS NA 8/112012 4420 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
6.47 NS NA 7116/2012 6.68 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually 8/112012 (6.45)
2.4 NS NA 1.4 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
4/30/2012 7/912012
6.40 NS NA 6.72 NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Field Data Worksheets Quarterly Sampling
Tab C Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
Tab C 1 Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring, August 2012
Tab C2 Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring, September 2012
Tab D Quarterly Depth to Water
Tab E Laboratory Analytical Reports -Quarterly Sampling
Tab F Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
Tab F1 Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring, August 2012
Tab F2 Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring, September 2012
Tab G Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
G-1AIB
G-2AIB
G-3AIB
G-4AIB
G-SAIB
G-6AIB
G-7AIB
G-8 AlB
G-9AIB
Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
Holding Time Evaluation
Laboratory Temperature Check
Anal ytical Method Check
Reporting Limit Evaluation
Trip Blank Evaluation
QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Radiologics Counting Error
Laboratory Matrix QC
Tab H Kriged Current Quarterly Groundwater Contour Map
Tab I Groundwater Time Concentration Plots
Tab J CSV Transmittal Letter
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
MW-5
• perched monitoring well
TW4-12 o temporary perched monitoring well
TWN-l0 9 temporary perched nitrate monitoring well
PIEZ-l
~
TW4-27
~
perched piezometer
temporary perched monitoring well
installed October, 2011
RUIN SPRING 6 seep or spring
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC. APPROVED
WHITE MESA SITE PLAN
SHOWING LOCATIONS OF PERCHED
WELLS AND PIEZOMETERS
DATE REFERENCE
H:/718000/mayl21Uwelloc12.srf
FIGURE
A-1
TabB
Field Data Worksheets Quarterly Sampling
Mill '-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r····_···············_····_··_················_·····_······_···· __ ··_····--····1 I OENlsONI)~~1 t MINI:S .
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
3 ra Q::;:().'fi"er" Cr1'OVVlo.vJC1..'ter ~Ol~
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1-1 _}I\_W_-_O_Q. __________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 Mr'lner Ho 11;J~j/-m
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 7/ J b 1:2D 1'2 and Sampling (if different) ,-I .;...1'I_Ii_jg ________ --J
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) QED '---------~
Purging Method Used: l'tl 12 casings [QJ3 casings
1. I NvJ-1fS Sampling Event 1 ~+t:rU:::l &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '-_________ ---J
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Specific Conductance r....1 ....;.4'1_1=---___ ---11 !lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 \~g. gO
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 \ o~. g3 4" well:I I~.~ 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '---___ --J
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) 1-.1 -=3:.....;7;..::3:::::;...(,~ _____ --I pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \5. E>~ Redox Potential (Eh)1 36~ TurbiditylL--0 __ ---J
Weather cond'l '--_C_l_0_\A_~_~ ________ --' Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)Ir....:2_li..;..o_. _---J
Time 1 JQ..~D Gal. Purged 1 2 9. 'is Time lr....l:....-~_y..;..J _----.I Gal. Purged 1 2.5. 17
Conductance pH 1'1.2 4 Conductance pH 1 7,%3
Temp.oC lSJ;1 Temp.oC 1 LS.50
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-.1 ..;...3_D_g __ --J
Turbidity (NTU) D Turbidity (NTU) o
Time 1124;[ Gal. Purged 1 2$.3f) Time 1);2. Y3 Gal. Purged 1:2.S . "b
Conductance 5735 pH 7.2Y Conductance pH 1 7·43
Temp.oC Temp.oC 115,52
Redox Potential Eh (mV) '500 Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-.1 ~_13 __ ----.I
Turbidity (NTU) o Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I U.O~ gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = ...... 1 _-_2_17 ___ --1 T = 2V /Q = I 114.1,(; I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 6
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ...... 1 _/1./....<./'.....;,4"--_____ ----'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha r$ 0 1,000 ml IE 0 HN03 ~
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1119, OS Sample Time .... 1 _l2.._ti5 ___ ----'
Comment
~ See instruction
Af'ri\led 0.\\ ~j1-e lA.-t loLJO, ""-;"nrlU ~n~ ~f(~" pfc::.s(!~t &r ?"'f'~e a.f\d ~o.Mf 1~n~ ~\)-e(]t..
t>""'("~G b~~V'I ",1-~ot..\5. fv..r~e~ VJc::.\\ .,ror t?--+c+"" 1 of' \ 20 M~nv'+C~_
~1-if 10 .... 5. ckc..r .f-hro v. ~ ).., o \At-h " f'uJ'~ ". Y' \ArE!::.'" e" J.e j OI.n A SC( ""p)~
Gone0+~~ ~ ).2.115.. Le.-ft-~;tc 0\.1-)Q.S2.
MW-0207-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r~~~I~~J)~ll WHIT:~:S~~~~~MILL
L~ MINES_~I FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ',Sri.l Q"'tk1'~.e("" G-('OlA.~J \Na-.+ef" ~O 12
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 ..f-B....:....W~--=();,-.3..L.-________ ---I
Sampler Name
and initials: I~"ne,... fJ6}Jitllit~/lH
Field Sample ill I MvJ-03_0718~Ol<'
Date and Time for Purging I 7/181 flD 1':2 and Sampling (if different) I,--"--~-,-~_:t). _______ ----,
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ..... I Q~~_p _____ ---'
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q",q,r-tGr-B G-w Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ..... _i'1_W_-_lg ______ .....
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0 pH Buffer 4.0 I £i.o
Specific Conductance l ..... q.L..:~_~ ____ --'1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.O 1ft): '---'-17_,_D_b __ ----....
Depth to Water Before Purging I ff34 :;""0 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 6 1(.653h)
3" Well:I-!,;-.-o-~----I.(.367h)
Conductance (avg) 5b8& '--"--~---------' pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) l Ib, leg Redox Potential (Eh)IL--3_J_J _---' TurbiditYL-1 ..;:::0 __ ---'
Weather Condo I c "'::>V\.\'l{)~
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)L-1 Zl_1_o __ .....1
"----~---------~
Conductance
Temp.oC
Gal. Purged I 14 :st
pH 1/.0c
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 32.1 "-------'
Turbidity (NTU) D
Time 1 0 q:S::I Gal. Purged I ) y. 97
Conductance
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V)
Turbidity (NTU) 6
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
1
Time I O~5) Gal. Purged I lL/. 70{,
Conductance
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ..... 1 _3_1Q.-"--_---'
Turbidity (NTU) o
Time 16953 Gal. Purged 1 15.1 g
Conductance 1 51./1 b pH I b·'(1
Temp. °C L-I ...;..;;It~, 1....:.'_---'
Redox Potential Eh (mV) L-I .,:::3;....,:0..5=-_---'
Turbidity (NTU) 6
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged 1£·bO gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1,---' ~_O_~ ___ ---, T = 2V/Q = 1 yg.f/1 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 10
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ,-k_"''j._~ _______ --I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients D D 100 ml D D H2SO4 D D
Heavy Metals CJ D 250ml ~ 0 HN03 'r!J D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml r D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) !J D Sample volume D ~ D ~
1=1 0 u..r'J 4e.
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1 q~. 7..5 Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
A rr i ~eJ. 0 l\ f. rho "'+ 0835. --f .. /ln~'" ""ItA &"cr; f\ rf'e5e"} -to' r f'''''''~''' ....... 1 .s "'" pl:,'j
'P \A.r~~ bC~iAn (h+ o&t.\6 . PV'.r6~J well +or ~ +o+-~l 0+ 75 M ~nL\,+es..
l.V~i-~r t..)a.,S Cle4r. P\'\I~C ~Y1ae~ o..n ~ S~(V1p)~ col1ec.tcd ~J-oq55 ,
~-eW SITe ~t I)J-'
MW-0307-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I!>E NI~~~ij~~1 WHIT: ~~~~~~~ MILL
J MINI:S ~ FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 3 t"3 Q v.o-.4t:r G-rou.t\J\ l,UoJi,... ;:2.0 J!2..
~ See instruction
Location (well name): L-I _}JI_W_~_O_3_~ ________ ----I
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 ~r") ne.--Ho J Ji ao.~111:!
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 7/181.:2..01.2.. and Sampling (if different) ..... 1 7....&...£-1 -'-1t{ ..... 1_~_.:....1~-'--____ --I
Well Purging Equip Used: 11:1 Ipump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L-I Q_E._D _____ ----'
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I QUCA.(fcr8 ~\,O Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I L-_M_W_-_O_3 ______ __'
pH Buffer 7.0 /,0 pH Buffer 4.0 I q.~
Specific Conductance ..... 1 _4q_q ____ --I1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.O 1 ft):1 r.... !:J...;...5_,_O_O __ ----'
Depth to Water Before Purging I gS. is Casing Volume (V) 4" well:~-G-'y;3..s;;;;;;....---II(.653h)
3" Well:. 6 . (.367h)
Conductance (avg) r.....-.....;5;;;;..t]...;.4..a.....:.4 _____ ----' pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I AI. 'I" Redox Potential (Eh) ..... 1 ~_~_J_----' Turbiditylr....-° __ ---'
Weather Condo
Time ..... 1 ~_1 ...;;;15 __ --, Gal. Purged 1'b,s::t
Conductance I SGfzt q pH
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) &....;1 3=-ifi~ __ .....1
Turbidity (NTU) o
Time 1 ObSq Gal. Purged r....1 _~ ___ .....I
Conductance 1 5460 pH 1/·0/
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1L-3_;;3>~b __ ----,
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event}IL-~_L1_o __ __'
Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH 11..--__ --'
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ..... 1 ___ ----'
Turbidity (NTU)
Time
Conductance
Temp.oC
Gal. Purged Ir....-o __ ---'
5~1g I
I~.ql
pHI 1.01
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I .=3 =3::...;.0 __ --1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 D.q
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
[Se ~Of~e~=-=-__ --.
Volume of Water Purged 1-1 _13_l_S_~ ___ --, gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I -;2.08
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I 6).84 I
10
1 1~.52..
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs II-N~I"A-~ ______ --I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients D D 100 ml D D H2SO4 D
Heavy Metals 19 D 250 ml rn D HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ D
SvJt~t~ If preservative is used, specify
r-(D.S> Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1.-1 ~_3_.l.S ___ ---, Sample Time 0700
See instruction
Comment
A r r ; "o~ On s;to ... + 08~. ""-;;:n ~ (f' "n J. Gur( II') fres.~ n}--To pI-' r ~e. well,
t>~(~e b~D.." 6..+ )0,0 I P~M'~ -(.6. ~-ell -f"of" fA. ~o}O\l 6.r' bo.5 Wl"r1LA.tt.S, P\Af<jec\ wen ~r~ J.
~o..-te("" W!A..5.. G\~o..<". f~~-c:. enJeJ 1:\,+ J 1).5. Lc:.~ SI"fG ~+ 1116
Arr;'Jea 0"(\ ~:+~ lJ.:t Ob.'Sl . -rNlner ",na Go.rrif\ ffe"eot 1-0 LoII~C:-T .s~tYJp)es" Pe.p-1-h 10 \A)~+e,
wo..s 88. 3S ~tJl.fVlp)e.s Gol1~c.:t~a ~-T D,D6, L~fr s/fe (A+ 070-5
MW-03A 07-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
lB
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
1~~;'~~;Pi~l FIELDDA~i=l~~E:2:~DWATER ~ S •• instruction
Description of Sampling Event: 1 '3 ('d\ G\I\.O..rt~r G-ro\J.YJd. w~+e'(" 2.61:2,.
Sampler Name
Location (well name): 1 MW .. 03 and initials: ~nf1~r HoIIJ~/7H
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 7/1 b / :;"'0 ]':2-and Sampling (if different) 1.-1 ~----.;VA~ _______ --,
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1.-1 G.~"::....;.D~ ____ ----,
Purging Method Used: [!TI2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q"''''r-h .... Jj Cr YJ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I.-M_w_ ..... _O_~ ______ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 /,0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance 1.-1 _t)_9--J~"--__ ---,1 ~MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 \Sg .SO
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 ] Db # LJ g Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ~D/1() 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '--___ --I
Conductance (avg) '---_~_q_:5_q-'--____ ____' pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \ b. 35 Redox Potential (Eh)1.-1 ,_'l.....;.~ __ --' TurbiditYI.-I _) ._5 __ --'
Weather cond'l I.-__ G_}_D_"'_~_i _______ ~
Time I l~Sb Gal. Purged 1 92...:5~
Conductance 1 .2~3~ pH 17-54
Temp.oC 1 )h,3~
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I \~5
Turbidity (NTU) I l.S
Time I ~qS2. Gal. Purged I \..\1 .7'1
Conductance I ;2...9"b'7 pH I 734
Temp.oC IJ~ ,~D
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1.-1 ..... J ~~5 __ ____,
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 ~ Y /)
Time 1)451 Gal. Purged 1 Y2. 53
Conductance
Temp.oC 11'·40
Redox Potential Eh (mV) L-I \7....;.;6~ __ --'
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I l~53
Conductance 1.2.. 491
Temp.oC l It; .?1J;
Gal. Purged I 42..~b
pH 1 /.'6
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 11.-'_bO ___ --I
Turbidity (NTU) p.'
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged ~3.qD gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 11.....-. _:2._1/ ___ ---'
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 114::11 7l I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) D
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
~ arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs .... 1 ;v~!J.:...;:'At~ _____ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals 1!1 0 250 ml ~ 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 12S.3l> Sample Time ...... 1 1~4~s5~ __ --'
Comment
~ See instruction
Arn'-.J(;d... on $11-C. q...1-ll~O. -r"nnc, ~()J. fr-rJ.rfl'n ~~.sen+-~r p\)..r8~ d\r"')a S't""'f}'j eU~J1+'
Pv.r~e b~jQ.1"! A.} 1135. rvr<A.e~\Nel\ for " ~ot"'\ ~ ::too t"')!(\~-tc!:~, w~...j-cr wa.s
yY10~lj Gle~r -}hro~o~ f~~e. PV\r~e. eV1tA~~ O\t 1~5,S. L~ sd-<-~ }liS7
MW-0507-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
D
D
D
2of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONr;)~~ ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINl:S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 ~' eX G",o..r:tc:r GrOlJ..nJ Wo-.+('r :;2.01:l-
Location (well name): I~M_W_-_l_l _________ ----I
Sampler Name
and initials:
Field Sample ID 1 j1\W -1\-DI \ 12.01~
Date and Time for Purging ..... 1 7_7_)\_7_2_0_1~ _____ --, and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [Q]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
See instruction
1 QED
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv'.o.."t~o('l~ 6-w Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ..... _fII_w_-_4S _______ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 glQ
Specific Conductance ..... 1 4_q_q=--___ ....... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1:3,0, DO
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 Kg, la. Casing Volume (V) ::: :::::I '~S~~' I~:~!~:i o.7.?>'l
Conductance (avg) .......... ~_~...;....:S=-==:::'b~ _____ --I pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \1.0l1 Redox Potential (Eh) ..... 1 _l D_' __ --' Turbiditylr....-0 __ ---'
Weather Condo l ___ ( __________ --' _ .,:)U\.tlni
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ..... 12_1_0 __ ......
Time 1 \2..6S
Conductance 1 9-b$1
Temp.oC 1 \1. \0
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
Time ..... 11 2:_0_7 __ .....1
Conductance 1 ~ ... $OO
Temp.oC 1 \1.05
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Gal. Purged 1 S~ .5~
pH ,.79
10,
o
Gal. Purged 1 Sq .():;2..
pH /. 7k
o
Time I ' 2.D " Gal. Purged 1 58,go
Conductance 1 ~73~ pHI 7.75
Temp.oC 1 17.0 y
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ..... _' 0_3 __ ----1
Turbidity (NTU)
Time ~I \ 2._0..;:;g_---' Gal. Purged IS'l.2.'i
Conductance 1 ;z:$4b pH 17/79 1
Temp.oC 1 \7,66
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ..... 1 ZJ ___ , __ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) o
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60= I '~)J
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I 2S:l.6.5 I
D
o
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I/fWAi,. 1 set of'\JO~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs W D 3x40 ml D ~ HCL "tI
Nutrients 1IJ D 100 ml D j!I H2SO4 'tI
Heavy Metals ~ D 250ml I!J D HN03 'tJ
All Other Non Radiologics 1tJ D 250 ml D ~ No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha tJ D 1,000 ml ~ D HN03 If]
Other (specify) 1$J D Sample volume D ~ D
G-e.nefo..\ :r nOr~~f'I:L.s If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I «g, 3 b Sample Time L..ol1 )~2=..:)...=:O~ __ ....J
Comment
~ See instruction
Ar1'\-.}e.a ol"l s.*c ~+ cr1:10. iAAner ().r,l\ G-()..("r~n ~'('e.~c!:nr -Fo,-'?~.~:("~~ o.r\~ ~G\.IV\'P) l::j e-ven-T
f'u..,.~ bet:,"'" .J-C'2,S, f \M"~c\ \o.l<:\\ .r.r ~75 \'Vl:flv..-tes. I.J",--ter w~ deo. .... t),c0'0ho",+
the 'Pv.r~e . 'P\.A("~e e.l'l.aed o..no. ~~f"'\plt!.s. were col1ecte4 d.1-}2JO.
L ~-8-~ lie (f;J 12.20
MW-11 07-11-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
~
D
YJ
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r~~;~~;i)~~1
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER 13r(); Q\A"-rte.r &f'ov.nJ G5&..'1>er ;2.0 l~
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 _M.....;W_-_l_2.'---_________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~nn t!"( HolUJ"'!d/'flt
Field Sample ID I tA;vJ ... \:L ... 07 \/:2..012,.
Date and Time for Purging L-I ......:7.~/...;..17.;....;1 ...... ;L_O.....;J_:2. ____ ___1 and Sampling (if different) L-I ~_VA ________ ....J
Well Purging Equip Used: [][]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ..... 1 Q_-e_D _____ ----'
Purging Method Used: It] 12 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I G.",o.r::f<..r~ 6-W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Ev~ntl L-_M_W_-_:l_3 _____ ----'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance ..... 1 ~.:...Ci;....J~'----___ --I1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I 'O!> .. Y.5
Conductance (avg) '--Y..LJ...) 1...:..':)=-_____ ---1
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.n
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1130.'10
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 14.33 ICo653h)
3" Well: ...... _0 __ ----'. (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I Jb,D~ Redox Potential (Eh)1 ~Ci1 TurbiditylL-l.I_1_. b~_....1
Weather Condo I 'P",,-tltl CJo",d~
Time I Oq?JS. Gal. Purged I J-<6.:;2.'
Conductance 917~ pH I 7.00
Temp.oC I )~ .07
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 =~~'6 __ ....J
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I Qq31
Conductance I Y I 7 g
Temp.oC I l t; . og
I 1), 5
Gal. Purged I j$ . b 9
pH I ()·~1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '50:2:
Turbidity (NTU) I 1 J . g
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ..... 1 _17_6
_--,
Time IOGI3b I Gal. Purged 1 2.'6·l1~ I
Conductance I L117~ I pH I b.Cffj I
Temp.oC l ie. og I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 310 I
Turbidity (NTU) r 11.7 I
Time I013p> I Gal. Purged 1 2g.~ I
Conductance I G] /] I pH I "(,.9'8' I
Temp.oC I 1(;.69 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 12'1&' I
Turbidity (NTU) I JI.' I
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = L-I ,_~_17 ___ ...... T = 2V/Q = I }:~;Zf 10 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 10
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ..... 1..-v._1l_A _______ ......
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients D D 100 ml D D H2SO4 D D
Heavy Metals ~ D 250ml 1:1 D HN03 ~ D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 1 ?-:1, \ D Sample Time IL-()----'~.....;~_() __ ---I
See instruction
Comment
MW-12 07-17-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
f····-·--····-···············-·········-·············-.. --.. ------,
IOENISONI)JJ I L_~NES ~............,
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
~('()\ Qv--o..;::tC'(" Gro'-Af\iX 00..:;=8' 2ol!L
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1L..-""_w_ ... _'_9 __________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: I=r:.t'ln(;r" Ho)ba~RH
Field Sample ID I MW-14-OJ \1""'01'2:
Date and Time for Purging 1L-7_/l_l_1 !2J_D_l ':l. _____ ......1 and Sampling (if different) 1-1 M_V._~ ________ .....I
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ~ E. D '-----------'
Purging Method Used: 11:1 12 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv\.o-."('"'""'c("~ G W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I-I_M_W_-_~ ______ ___'
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 L1.D
Specific Conductance. I I-q~q1-=--___ --,1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I l~g.70
Depth to Water Before Purging I }O:3>.'tO 4" well:l lb.lq 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L--___ .....I
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) ~q'3>S
~--~-----~
pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lS,~\ Redox Potential (Eh)L-1 _~_,_---, TurbiditylL....:::O~ _ ___'
Weather Condo
Time 11235 Gal. Purged
Conductance 1 3q~q pH
Temp.oC 11S.hS
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1(4';)..7
Turbidity (NTU) 0
Time I )')52 Gal. Purged
Conductance I ~~~~ pH
Temp.oC 111.; .b~
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
37. 'i"1
1 G;·8g
I :3g.~Q
~,~'I
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)IL..-:;2_L)_O_---'
Time L-P .2._3_] _--I Gal. Purged 1 35. I 'f
Conductance 13 '130 pH 1 (c'.8<J
Temp.oC 115.'0
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I .2;2.3
Turbidity (NTU) Cl
Time 1'233
Conductance I 342&
Temp.oC I }S.bD
Gal. Purged I 37)' (,,:6.
pH I b,81
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I _!J.._1_7 __ .....1
Turbidity (NTU) 10
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ..... 1 ..;;;.3 .... Q'-'-",O::;...b=-__ --' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L-I ~_;2._1J ___ --I
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I l,-\q·~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 10
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs IAY-lAL 1 ~a or '-'Ow I 1 Ji 1')
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs tIl 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL "rJ
Nutrients ]lj 0 100 ml 0 n H2SO4 I!j
Heavy Metals ltl 0 250ml 1:1 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics lfl 0 250 ml 0 l:J No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha .it] 0 1,000 ml 1!:J 0 HN03 l!J
Other (specify) nJ 0 Sample volume 0 1!J 0
{Ye'(lt«(A\ :rnor~t'l \0 If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I lOl.j 1'30 Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
Arr\\le~ 0(\ S>tG ~-t OGl30 .)o..nr'\Gf"' a.n~ &().(,..;Y\ }>l'eSt!Y\f -for ?w~e (A()~ .s#\tv)p)~Z5 e\lGr\'1,
Pv.r~c:: be~OV\ ~-t o~3S, 'P",,("~ca ~~l\ ~( CA. +o-hd of" ) gD m,'nu. t~s. l.Vo...+~r
\,..)(i..5 G1eo..t'". fv.r~e: et1deJ anl ...5a.f'1'fdc..s G61Iec,f.!A tk.} 12.35. Let}!:, I1-C ~~
\2LlS
MW-14 07-11-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0 m
0
18
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I--........ · .... --.-.--... -------~···-··-·--···-··-·-· I OENlsoNI)~~ ! MINI:S ~. ,
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
~'f'(J. Q~~=te:r G-rou,n():wo...fer ~61~
~ See instruction
Location (well name): L-I M;,.....;...;W----"-LS=-_________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~1\ne("" ~~l1la~j)rJf
Field Sample ID I MW-\S,..0717~OI'2..
Date and Time for Purging I 7/177:;"'Ol~ and Sampling (if different) ~.N;.L.yJ.r..;;;.(1~ ______ ----,
Well Purging Equip Used: [f[]pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) QED L--~ _____ ~
Purging Method Used: 002 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q.,..(),.M-a-1~ G W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ...... _M_W_-_l_d.. _____ ......
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y.o
Specific Conductance ...... 1 ----=-q...;..~ 1..!-__ ----'1 !!MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I ]~7·6D
Depth to Water Before Purging I] 0 b .4.5 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 J q 4 qy 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '-------'
Conductance (avg) , .... 1 _,-\..:..;~ ...... q-,--D _____ ~ pH of Water (avg) 7. oS
'----------~
Well Water Temp. (avg) I S. ~ b Redox Potential (Eh)1 2.5& Turbidity ...... 1 D ___ --'
Weather Condo
Time ...... ll_D_YS __ ----' Gal. Purged ~Y1.0b
Conductance I 111. ~ 7 pH 1,,05
Temp.oC \S.9t
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ..... _2._'_9 __ --'
Turbidity (NTU)
Time ...... 11 ...... 0.....;4 ....:.1 __ --'
Conductance 1 QI ~t
1 0
Gal. Purged
pH
Temp.oC ...... 1 _15_.Y_' __ ...... 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1259
Turbidity (NTU) D
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
/·05
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event}L-1 ..:...17;;....0 __ --'
Time I 'OLI'
Conductance I Y2Q.b
Temp.oC 1\5.43
Gal. Purged I ~ 't .27
pH 1-"7·(b
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ..... 2_b_o __ --'
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I \oyg Gal. Purged 1 34 .71
Conductance 1 921q
Temp. °C 1 l5·S::£
Redox Potential Eh (m V) IL.o25_:t __ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1,---~...;...2...;.r...:--J __ --I T = 2V /Q = I 193. 8(, I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I lJ
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1-1 ~_Y~ _______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients D D 100 ml D D H2SO4 D
Heavy Metals ~ D 250ml ~ D HN03 111
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I lO~ .2b Sample Time 1-.1 _lO_5_0 ___ --I
Comment
~ See instruction
kr:~~'\ 0(\ !S..1-c::. ... t 07'10. ~r,"<r <\A6 6-"",6" prGSe"t--:t.r f'u.r~G din.! .s"JN1pl~ eve":!:
P\Ar~c b~()f1 ~+ Otl.lS. P\).('~e.d WG1'.fot"" fA.. -i-c>1-CA 1 of"' J85 Mif)\A.+~S.. W~+er~!A.S dea.~.
p \;\.r~G ~f"I~ect ~Y\t\.. ..$CA.Mp)('.. c.c,\lec;}-c:.l ~ JOsCJ. LLJ+-~I-t~ 0..+ 1 D 6~.
MW-15 07-17-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
[_ ....•..... __ •...•....•....•...• _ ... __ ._._._._----,
I OE~f~,,~J~
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
3? 6 QO\A.d..Aer Grou.nI1\Wo.,+er ~Ol~
~ See instruction
Location (well name): !'---P\_W_-_,g __________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: F!tI\.1\1)if Ao) II Jq~/Ttl
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging L-!7_!_I_E._I ~_O_l Q. _____ --I and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: []JJpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: !ID !2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event ! Q\A~,-"h~ ..... '.=3 6-W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I L-M_vJ_ ... _X_y ______ ......
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 '-1 .0
Specific Conductance ..... ! ~...;..q ...... j ____ ...... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): ! )'3'1 ,00
Depth to Water Before Purging !70.} 0 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 til.72... 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h)
'--------I
Conductance (avg) 1 ..... _~_=_l).L-l.:.....:lll..--___ ..,__----I
~~7\
pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) ...-! T"'"!S.".... ...... 9r-=l:-------. Redox Potential (Eh)1 21Y Turbidity! .2 .:3
WeatherCond. I Po.ri-t1 Gl0ua~
Time l~lD Gal. Purged g3.5Y
Conductance I;; 1..\7'-'. pH I b.bl
Temp.oC 1 \6 .00
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I D_:l_7 __ --I
Turbidity (NTU)
Time L-I '_3_l~ __ ----,
Conductance 1 ':y .. ] 7 1
Temp.oC
1 :2..\
Gal. Purged 1 3:)t 17
pH 1 G.bl:(
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1"--2._1o __ ----'
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)! ..... l_8_o __ --'
Time I r511 Gal. Purged I ~j, 7 b
Conductance I :3 q 15
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ~I;L._J......;Y~_----,
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 131:S
Conductance 13Y b1
Temp.oC I ls.'1E
Gal. Purged 1 g4.) 9
pH 1 G .. 69
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ;t_D_7 __ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) 1.2.9
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I .. 'J-11
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I .3SY .57 I
10
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I ..... ""_1" _______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals 'tl 0 250 ml 'tl 0 HN03 W 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 'E 0 Sample volume 0 'i!1 0 ~
S",,\f'CAte If preservative is used, specify
-rDS
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 11 , l..5 Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
A(""rive~ 0)'\ si+<:.. 0..1 OG'-\ t. ~"flt,... d,:"~ G-o.(("'t'\ ffGSen-r ..ror-?v..r~-e ~n~ ..sG\M'Pl~~ -e~eY\l
fv.(""~e 'bejo.n o..-t 06'1~, 'Pv..("~(:~ V:>e)I.rot fA totl1\) o-F 31D yv1;n IA.tG5. VJo..~( wo..s \'V'DS1-~\ Cl<ar -n ro~hov..1-+he. 'Pv..~~e. ?",rt1e en~ea (.{n~ So.M4'lc.) c.ollec.ic4 ~-t \~15. Le:f.r 5;t~ v.. t }31J
MW-18 07-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r---·----------I OENISON')~~ MINI:S
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
3f"O QV\",;;fe.r &rolA~C1VJ~fer 20 J,2..
~ See instruction
Location (well name): I L...: M:...:,...'N.;,..-_l:.....l1 __________ ......1
Sampler Name ~
and initials: I ==r l.."nGf' H 0) J / /?HhJt
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 7/Ig/.2ol~ and Sampling (if different) 7/11/.2D1:2.. ~---------......I
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [gJ bailer
Purging Method Used: 00 2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event L-I _Q-'-"'-...;..(}I.._t"_f _G_f"_lj...o..-_G-_W ___ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance ~I _9.:....1;....9~ __ ---J1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I 5'3. 3S
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ~I Q __ E_D _____ --'
I MW -D.3A Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1-_________ ......1
pH Buffer 4.0 LLo
Well Depth(O.Olft): I )1, q. 00
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ,;2.. liS IC.653h)
3" Well:l-. _O __ ---I.(.367h)
pH of Water (avg) L-17_,2._] _____ ---J
Well Water Temp. (avg) . I lY,g)
Weather Condo I Do.. ... ~ I Cko..f"
Redox Potential (Eh)~1 _~_I_)_----' Turbidity II-0=-__ --'
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) 1-1 ~_-o __ --,
Time I 01$ Gal. Purged I} 2.C1 . II Time 10/.56 Gal. Purged 1129, 3~
Conductance I \, K'-\ Conductance 11..-\ _7_IJ.:..-_--' pH I ""1.20
Temp.oC I ''1 ~D Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) ~I '3_,_'1 __ ---1
Turbidity (NTU) o Turbidity (NTU) o
Time I 0157 Gal. Purged I 1.1.'1.5'1 Time ID75 & Gal. Purged 112.9.7-6
Conductance \7 g:L. pH I 7.2 :0 Conductance 117 bOO: pH I 7.2.1
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1L.;;;3;;.,..O_' __ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) o Turbidity (NTU) 10
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged J30.2() gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I ~ ~J ] T=2V/Q= I 575.bh I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I e)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I C)
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1 ..... /'/._7._~ _______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate . Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 n 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250m! 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ..... 1 _b"_.t_'D ___ --' Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-19 07-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 r-------------------------------------------------------------1 I OENISONI)~~ L MI""I:S _ I FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 3f'~ Q\.VI\rt(!r &rO\A.Y\~u.)~+~r ~OJ.:z
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Location (well name): 1L--..;...A~VJ_ ... _::l:3 __________ __I
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 ~t1n~r t1oJJ)a";1/77-J
Field Sample ID f/lVJ-;)...3-071 b;2..0)~
Date and Time for Purging 1 ,/J'I:;...o]':2.. and Sampling (if different) 7 J 17/2019... L--~~ _______ ~
Well Purging Equip Used: [][]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1-1 Q_~_D ______ __I
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 Q v.<A.4-er" B & \I\S Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I-1_)JI_vJ_ .... _D_'6 ______ ~
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 _4_q~ ____ ...... 1 !lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 }.3~ .. OO
Depth to Water Before Purging I l~'1.15 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 13 .. bl 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L.--___ ~
Conductance (avg) '--..... 3==:;.:-t...1..-c...:::;;~ _____ ---' pH of Water (avg) f,.~b '-----------'
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 ~b,!l.l Redox Potential (Eh)1 ~2:!:> Turbidity I .... _]'_._b_~
WeatherCond. I ?M+b Glol>.~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) .... 1 ~~~_o_~
Time \S l.S Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance ':>705 Conductance pH L-I __ ----I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) .... 1 2-.;..2.....:3""--_--' Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ___ ----'
Turbidity (NTU) 1 1 b.O Turbidity (NTU)
Time a....;;1 O;....7_3_1~_......I Gal. Purged 0 '-------' Time 1 0733 Gal. Purged ..... 1 _0 __ ----'
Conductance 1 385' pH 17.0 8 Conductance 1 5& b I pH 1 7, ] 6
Temp.oC 117.7S Temp.oC I lg .:Ll
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I-r~.....;~;......;:;b __ ~ Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 .... 3..;;...1...::g:.....-_~
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
l?:>e:\;{' e. It-\-+e.,
V olume of Water Purged 2.S.D~ gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I • ~~g
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I )50.41 I
1.-//4
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1-1 JV.---:..Z,;",:A:.....-_____ ----I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients D D 100 ml D D H2SO4 D D
Heavy Metals 1:8 D 250 ml ~ D HN03 ~ D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth &....;Il_:l_q _. C>_D __ ----I Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
Arr;"ea 01"1 );ite G.1-1::t5S. ~nner' B.J1:j~ p"e.setd-.£1" f\U~" ~(1a .s~"'P);~1 eve,,+.
fv.."'~<:' be:~"'1\ OL.j-13M, ?"'r~~ well.for 0.. -;\-"t .. l .;; \35 Y'\.n.,d-.. ~. ?"'r~d ~~/I J.~l.
f\At~e. t:Y\tk~ J-\5'b. V-J~~,r \N~~ M051~ Cle~(. Le1i-s~c 4 lS11
Arr; v-e~ 01\ sj+~ d 0-:/:;"7. TAnner o.('I~ &(Arr;" pf'C.s~n-t +0 60n~c.+ ~Mflt..s . t:)ep+~ +6 w~1-~r wo.~. };2.7. (;5
~r"?'eS. Go\l~ct~j, ",-1 073~ L~ s.il-<:. ~ 013'5:,
MW-23 07-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
I
~
!
o ~ ..
....
S
... ..
I !
MifI-Groundwiilter Discharge Permit
Grou"ndwater M"onitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACIDIENT 1-2
\VHlTE l\tIESA URANIU~f ~ULL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sam piing Event: I ?t~. G\J..o..(".t~(' &rov.n A Wc;..-ter . ~I::"
Location (well name): 1-1 ...:...M..t..:Wr...;;.....s;il-2~lj~ ______ ~_.-I
Field Sample ID I MW-).Li ... D11!5 ;l.Ol~
Sampler Name
and initials:
Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.:
Date and Tilne for Purging .... 1 ...:..J.~/J-.lf1~/{)..O~;:;...l,&.;;..o....~ ______ __ and Sampling (if different) .... 1 7~' '-/w/81L..bL>I!:;;:=..t.::J~~-.:... ___ ---.J
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or @] bailer Welt Pump (if other than Bennet) 1-1 Q:::;)..:;€:;,..;D;:;...·_. ____ ---..I
Purging Method Used: 002 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Qu..o..r4-erb G:W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I .... _M_W_-_l5_~ _______ ....J
pH Buffer 7.0 ,.0
Specific Conductance 1-' .;...:.&f-t.'11-4--___ ...JIJiMHos/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging [ )r~.~ ... -J
Conductance (avg) L..\~L\t:t ~~~~--------~
pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I t;tO.oc
Casing Volume (V) 4ft wen:1 ~:b~(.653h)
3ft WeJl:r '0 =:==1(.36711)
pH of Water (avg) t...1' -:'" ..;;.{,....;; . .:t_7..:..-. __ ..;....;...._ .....
Well Water Temp. (avg) f :t.c>.i"5 Redox Potential (Eh)1 :l..'1b TurbiditylL..,o,.;;;.,..... . .5=-_.....I
Weather Cond. Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·C (prior sampling event)1.,.;1 ~~;.....o_-.J
Time I 103Q I Gal. Purged [7.~~~~=:J Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance [q~3~:':::'::-:'.1 pH 16.~7 '1 Conductance I I pHI : I
Temp.oC I 2D.I~ I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I :2~b I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I Q ~5 I T u~bidity (NTU) I I
Time . r_9.~~.: J Gal. Purged I Q I :-
Time I D6;~5 " l GaL Purged 1·0 . I
Conductance I ".l.. , I pH I b.55 · I '1~O!>
Conductance I ~~ Ll. I pH [~,,·::f5..:.:.-~:-.-.~J
Temp.oC Db .~S: : ,:'] Temp.oC [ 'J~.-~:_~ : .~
.
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~i:i I Redox Potential Eh. (m V) I ~O O I
Turbidity (NTU) [.-O·.?{."-
.~-" .... ,. ,~, ,] Turbidity (NTU)' I O~3 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater ~ lof2 capturx-COMPATIIHE WIn+/,--WU-li:---f'UN(,TlOHAl.IT
MiII-Groundwater Discharge Permit . .... Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S/60 = I .. ~q;t
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if oilier than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= r 38s~3 I
I ;V/A I
17.(;,8 ~
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I L!. ~';':''/,,.l;JA!...-_____ ---lI
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 O · HCL ·0 ··· ·0
Nutrients 0 0 lOOmI 0 0 H2SO4 ·0 .. 0
Heavy Metals 1SiII·· 0 .250ml ·61 0 . RN03 :til . ··0
AU Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250m) ·0 .. 0 No Preserv. 0 ·0 .. . .
Gross Alpha 0 0 I~OOO ml 0 O · HN03 0 ···0 ·
Other (specify) Sample volume ; ..
0 0 0 O· · .. 0 0
..
, If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
.. Final Depth t 1.23. ,co Sample Time 0 630
I
!comment
See instruction " .. ~j.'
Ar(,\\le~ on ~i+c o..--\-0<145. -r~I1,..er tA,..~ Cro.rr'" pr~Sfn-l ..R.t p ..... ~e.
p ~ .. ~" he~"" ... -l:-oQ5Cl. f v..r ~eA we \ 1 -+;,.-If.. ta+", I e.f' ~ 6 1"1 ,nLA 1-eS. 'p u.~~"J ", .. II J~ \i-,)o...-t~('" \i..:)~ M05>-+!j (Ieo..r. ?""{'5e' enJecl. ~....r 1030. Le..+:r s ~+~ 1J...1-)C>3:;t j
. \ d' J . De..p~ . A rl" V-e..Q.. Or"\ ~.le. <AT Obi". l~"'"(", '-'."t;\ &,,",r("~ f\ pr~~'T +0 c-clle.c.. + .5ArYtp1e... Pe.pth +c W,,-1e,...
S4\,-..,p 1e (.¢UeGt~a 4.1 ~ Ob3f.> Le~ .s('+~ t-\..f. Ob3k . '.1'1.37
I..-_______ ----l. IDo not touch this eel] (SbeetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Oata Worbheet tor Groundwater
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER I ~f""iX Q"",u"f""ter (;rov-",£}\ w~f~,.. 2.D)~
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1-1 M_W_"'_~:S __________ ----I
Sampler Name
and initials: I-r;.t"l'\-t.f »0 1 h'J\~ IT»
Field Sample ill
Date and Time for Purging L-17_1_1D......;I_9-_0_,_'2 ____ --I and Sampling (if different) /V/fo '-----------~
Well Purging Equip Used: IT!Jpump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L-I _Q_~_-_D _____ ----I
Purging Method Used: [][]2 casings @]3 casings
:r I MW-30 Sampling Event 1 6>"'~("Te.f'b c,..\J Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '--_________ ~
pH Buffer 7.0 ;,D pH Buffer 4.0 L).O
Specific Conductance L-I 9_~_~ ____ --I1 [lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 115. () 0
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 /:'.15 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:l 2-b/:.t3 IC.653h)
3" Well:L-__ o __ --I.c.367h)
Conductance (avg) 1-1 ..... 322.S ________ ---' pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \5.77 Redox Potential (Eh)1 :35 , Turbidity 1 1 ) • E 0
Weather Condo I'--G_\_e_u.._( ___________ ~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ...... 1 _:;1.._0_°_----'
Time 1 j;2JS Gal. Purged 1 S~,S<j Time I l21k Gal. Purged I 5 ~ . ~ ()
Conductance 1 3':227 pH ~.l10 Conductance I '3'2.~'
Temp.oC I \S :1'1 Temp.oC I 15.75
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I 3_b_O __ --'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time I \211 Gal. Purged I 59 , O:J:: Time I )2.18 Gal. Purged I S9 :;2-Lj
Conductance 1L-3_~_11 __ --I pH G.gg Conductance I 3!ZZ::t:
Temp.oC I IS.go Temp.oC I IS.'7l1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L.:I ~::;;........;R5~ __ --, Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ...... 3_3_0 __ ----'
Turbidity (NTU) n. J Turbidity (NTU) I ll. g
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged IL-S_9_,_b_7 ___ --' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L-I _. _.J2..._'7 ___ ....J
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1?.9g.;tC; I
10 .-
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 10
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I fIwA L \ Sad a\O' v oc.s
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs 1J D 3x40 ml D 1tI HCL ~ D
Nutrients t1 D 100 ml D t1 H2SO4 tJ D
Heavy Metals ~ D 250 ml 'f] D HN03 f] D
All Other Non Radiologics lJ D 250ml D "l] No Preserv. D ~
Gross Alpha 11 D 1,000 ml ~ D HN03 "'t1 D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D lJ D )J
G-en~r6\l "'Inl:>r..5fA";c.> If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I lS J S:l. Sample Time \ :l.'l.:D
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-25 07-10-2012 IDa not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater ~onitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
~ See instruction ()ENISONr.J~~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINIES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 ~,.a ~w>"i:t(;r GrOU(\J w",fe;r ~01~
Location (well name): ..... 1 ...:..M.....:..W..;,.;;....-...:;,:;L_, _________ -----'
Sampler Name
and initials: 11O..nncr HbJ1l'J~ IrB
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 7/11 b 0 l:;l. and Sampling (if different) IV /,4 ~~~-------------~
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I L6(1+;nll\OU\,>
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event 1 Qv..~f+~d~ G-w Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I.... __ M __ W __ -)_~ ____________ ___J
pH Buffer 7.0 I .b pH Buffer 4.0 t4.D
Specific Conductance 1....1 _~!....,;9:......j4'---______ .....I1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 \~1.~3
Depth to Water Before Purging I 6;2., Y () Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 3g,t4Z 1(.653h)
3" Well: '6 (.367h) '---___ __oJ
Conductance (avg) 1-1 ...;;;3~Y_'1~5 ______ __oJ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 11 b. ~D Redox Potential (Eh) 1,-_) g_.5 __ --1 Turbidity ,-I _0 __ ---1
Weather cond·1 ..... ___ S __ V\._n_f\_f __________________ ----' Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) 1-1 _!:L_'1_o_---I
Time l oC}so Gal. Purged 1 L-_0 ______ -.....1 Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 13QQS pH Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC 1 b. :La Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ....:.\..:;.:g3~_---oJ Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time Gal. Purged Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance ·1 L-___ ~ pH Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC ..... 1 ___ ---oJ Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged c gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I lD.E
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I b I
I D
b
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I AWAL , sJ of \JOG!> I 1 j;1l
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs m D 3x40 ml D ~ HCL rn D
Nutrients [] D 100 ml D 121 H2SO4 Dr D
Heavy Metals ~ D 250 ml 1!J D HN03 [:J D
All Other Non Radiologics tEl D 250ml D rlI No Preserv. D r2f.
Gross Alpha ~ D 1,000 ml L!J D HN03 Li D
Other (specify) IJI D Sample volume D ~ D eli
G-el'\ f! (6-' :tno!jo.n i c.~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1L-\..L..!l-.l.7..:... O::::;...J...' __ --' Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
~(('\'\)ec\ On ~~+~ a...1' 0<:\3g, -r1)..'(\}'lerO\flJ. G-~r(";1) pre.!)eTlt +0 co\lt::c.1-5.~yY\pl~s.
\J.)""te:(' wo...s c,leo,.('. .s"'1"')p)~ l:o)l~deJ ,,1' 04'5L L~+t .srt~ a..-t 100D
MW-26 07-11-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
i----------------------------------------------------1 I OENISONI)~_ ~I I MINES __
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
I 3/A Qv-Ci\;:fer Gf"ov.na~4er 201.<., 1<e~O\r-Y'p}e
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ...... 1 .;...f\..;..W_-2_k __________ ----J
Sampler Name
and initials: FG"ner JJ()}],;J~J-rH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ...... 1 _g_I_I'_1_2_0_'_2 ____ ----' and Sampling (if different) ...v/,4 L--____________ ~
Well Purging Equip Used: [QJpump ~r @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I ConfmlAOlA.$
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q "",-<fer b G-vJ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ...... _AJ_Y_A ______________ ~
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 I Y,O
Specific Conductance 1,"---4_1_~ ___ --'I ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1'--1_2.._1._3_""5 __ ----'
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ~ 7 ~50 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) a.....-___ ~
Depth to Water Before Purging I b3, q 0
Conductance (avg) 3Y~5 ~~~------~
6.g0 pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 ]4. £I; Redox Potential (Eh) 1L....-1S_LJ_----' Turbidity ...... 1 6 ___ ~
Weather Condo Ia.....-G_lo_\}.._d_U _________ ---I
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ...... I'_CJ_o __ ......
Time I063Q Gal. Purged 0 Time Gal. Purged
Conductance 13'i 2.S pH b·gO Conductance pHI
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ...... 1 .;...lS.;...4..;...... __ ~ Redox Potential Eh (mV) I
Turbidity (NTU) 10 Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pHI
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV)-1
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged o gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1 \O.S
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 0 1
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs .... 1 _N ...... /..;..;A _______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs 'ill 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL ~
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1.-1 \_?._D_,_O_O __ --I Sample Time 1.-1 O=-bY..;..D ___ .......
Comment
~ See instruction
p;«;'::'e.A Gn ~i+" ~ 0(,3,-\. --r.:nner ",",1 G-o..rr:YI 'f're.se.1l+ -fOy-PW"~< "",I. .s.:;,.,p'" €Ve,,7.
Sb..)'V\pl('.5, were. (..ollec.-teJ 0\+ o~YO. W",-ter ~ cJeCkr. Le.++ .sifctd-D{,<-jS,
MW-26 08-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
[·_····_······_···········_···_········_··_·_··---1 I OENISONl)j~
L_MINI:S I
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
~ ('00 Q\.A,C\-r+er Grav.ndl \Ij~~('" .20 J.=l.
~ See instruction
Location (well name): lL-iA:..-...W_~21_7 _________ ----I
Sampler Name
and initials: E;IV\e,r ijD l};J\0..!:3 /17}-
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 ..... 1....;/....;J_'=-..;../:J-L:>'---..... 1Q. _____ ...... and Sampling (if different) .... 1 _/'oI_I_I+ ________ .....J
Well Purging Equip Used: IltJ Ipump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) Il--o._E_D ______ --'
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 ~uo..rtcrt1 &vJ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I .... _M_W_-,_Y _______ .....J
pH Buffer 7.0 L-I _,_. _0 ___ ____1 pH Buffer 4.0 t\.O
Specific Conductance .... 1 _q_q_~ ____ ..... 1 !!MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): ..... 1 _<15_._0_0 __ ---'
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 :5 \ \ 1:,5 4" well:1 Q.g. sb 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L--___ --I
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) )S/~ pH of Water (avg) 7.-:SQ
Well Water Temp. (avg) lS.0~ Redox Potential (Eh)IL-:s_6_~ _ ____I TurbiditYL-1 ...;:O~ _ ____I
Weather Condo
Time L-llll,.,;..,l _l D __ ---I Gal. Purged 57.5D
Conductance pH 1 7.3~
Temp.oC 115.60
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU) o
Time ..... 1 oI...L) 1..;..c12.::a-______ Gal. Purged 157. ~3
Conductance 158'0 pH 75"10
Temp.oC 15 .. 0::(
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ~o!l 1--___ -....1
Turbidity (NTU) b
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( {prior sampling event}L,.;..llb_o __ --I
Time ..... 1\_11_1 __ ...... Gal. Purged 1 S7.7:;Z
Conductance 1 '57 ,\
Temp.oC I 15.6l
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '367
Turbidity (NTU)
Time ...... 1 )L..:."ll:..;;;:::,"'--_ ......
Conductance IElE
o
Gal. Purged IS g . }:s
pH I 7, Yo
Temp.oC IS.01
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ~_'1_, __ ......
Turbidity (NTU) b
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged L-I .....;S;..;::g;.....,_S..,.j4L..--_----I gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L-I _' :::L_17 __ ----I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I :2."-;)...7 D I
I 0
10
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs \..,;1 N:...:....!..iII3t...:::-______ ---I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients "£I D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha E D 1,000 ml tJ D HN03 "EI
Other (specify) rs D Sample volume D ~ D
ch'or-;l( If preservative is used, specify
~p.s Type and Quantity of Preservative:
SV\~1(
Final Depth 1.....:1 ~~'..:::;b"":'Y __ ----I Sample Time I L-..;..;..ll_l!) ___ --I
Comment
Arr-:\led,. 0(\ ~;te oJ 064D,-r-l\nn~r ~fla O-I\((;n fr~~efl+
f\A.r~~ b~,l'\ ~+ ObY.5, 'P \Ar~e~ \.\:Ie' I for ().. +o-r~-' of
Gl-co.r ~r"v..~hov-.T-'P\A. .. ~c.. 'Pv\'i"~c=.. eYldej, fMJ...
L~n-$1iG ~+ 11 ~3 .
MW-27 07-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
~ See instruction
-tor p\.Ar~(.. ~t'\J.. .s~Mp),,~ e'0(.rlt.
2-70 tv) ;Y)(}\.+~. WO\.+cr Wo.,s
~~tyl p)~ Co) Ic~C'J t:t7-)))6,
N
D
D
D
D
D
IlJ
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 r···_·········_············_···_·_-_··_·· __ ···_·······_ .................. _ .•....
OENISONI)~~ ~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINI:S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 '3 r~ Q \Ao..-rfer GrOvyJ WO\I+t:f :;2..0 I:;L
Location (well name): 1 L-...:.,M..;.,w_-.;;...;2.g-=-_________ --I
Sampler Name
and initials: I:::r;.nfl(:(' »oJ1;J~ftr.r
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 7/1f./2'/!)12 and Sampling (if different) #/A ~--------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) .... 1 _Q_EJ)~ ____ ----,
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 Q\AlA.(f crJ.j G-W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I .... __ M_W_ ... _2_~ _____ __'
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 ...:.~...;..q1oL.-___ -,1 !lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 7 ~ ,S7
Conductance (avg) 3q b 1 ~-=~~---------~
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.O 1ft): 1 11 0.00
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ~l. g~ IC.653h)
3" Well: ..... __ 6 __ --I.(.367h)
pH of Water (avg) IL-b~, 3_4~ _____ --,
Well Water Temp. (avg) .... 1 _lS_~_lg __ __, Redox Potential (Eh)1 ~5S Turbidity .... 1 _0 __ ---'
Weather Condo
Time .... 1'_0_3_0 __ -,
Conductance 1 3~ 70
Temp.oC 1 \ S· \ll
Gal.Purged 1 tl~.l.jg
pH 1 '.L)~
Redox Potential Eh (m V) .... 1 ..;;;;;~;..;:::b:S=-_----,
Turbidity (NTU) 1 6
Time 1103Z
Conductance 1 30j bS
Temp.oC 1 ]5 .. 19
Gal. Purged 1 Q9.9)
pH ~.1><g
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ...... 1 ~_5_& __ ---,
Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext" Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) .... 1 _16_· __ --'
Time 1....11_°=3...:...1_----' Gal. Purged 1 '-I '-i. 7(:)
Conductance 1 ~'17~
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) IL-3S~...:.1 __ --,1
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time 1....11_0 ~-=-_---' Gal. Purged I 905.\3
Conductance 1 rsq 70
Temp.oC 115.17
Redox Potential Eh (m V) .... 13_&---.;. __ --'
Turbidity (NTU) 10
1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I '15.57 gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ,,:L\l
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I ~O 1. 14 I
o
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1...1 _;V;_v,_Zl" ______ ----'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) m 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 [2]
Gh lO(';j,
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
.,
Final Depth I 7tf. 7 0 Sample Time L..1~_J..~;.....;L='r;:;...· .. -___ ......I \035
Comment
~ See instruction
A (-r~ "eA 01\ S itc ",} 0700, ~fI )'\c!t' 1'\'/'1 A &/Arr,'n prc~el'\} ~br f u,"'{j 'C. {Jtf\~ SC4W1pL'C,j ev-enT.
f~r~.., b~"" .d-0705. PU('ff"-well ~,. "'-+0-1-... 1 of' !l.1O M .',., '" -1-es.. vl ... rer "'''6 d"'''''r.
fv.<&(. e",c\.t~ Q.,f\~ So\fVlpl!.-w~.s. collt(,-t-t:a 1>..1-1035.. Le.~ ~\i-<: (A.-t lD-:>7
MW-28 07-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r~~:~~J).ill ;i~ MINES ~
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
13ri}\ Q\A~f"+(A' G-rD\A.fJ\ ~o..ter' :lOla...
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 M~W-=---;l..--=-g _________ ---I
Sampler Name
and initials: I-r;t\ner-Htl \h'J~.Im
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging .... 1 .....;«;.:../_l _/~_o_I'2... _____ ...... and Sampling (if different) A//A L--_~ ______ ~
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) .... 1 _G_E_D _____ --'
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q\kC'Ar""ter kl 6-\15 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I .... _N_y~ _______ ___I
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0 pH Buffer 4.0 L.\.O
Specific Conductance .... 1 _q..:..q~4L----__ ___I1 !lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I )10. ()O
Depth to Water Before Purging I 7 b. b~ Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 2J:17 1(·653h)
3" Well: 6 (.367h) L--___ --'
Conductance (avg) D~'1? L--_~~~ ____ ~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \5.11: Redox Potential (Eh)I ...... ~_\ t __ .....1 Turbidity ...... 1 O~ __ .....I
Weather Condo
Time 1L-.1 ~_5S __ ...... Gal. Purged
Conductance pH 5.gb
Temp.oC IS.7D
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ...... 1 "3_!l----=.S __ .....I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0
Time I }~ 5"1 Gal. Purged 1 \401.25
Conductance 1:05199 pH 1 51 ~D
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 31"
Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)IL-~_l1_b_---,
Time I) ~:S.6
Conductance 13'14LJ
Temp.oC
Gal. Purged I yq. tI'i
pH I S.go
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 '3_'1:....-_---'
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 t35 B Gal. Purged I yq. Lji
Conductance 1 3'131 pH &..;1 5_,_8_'_---'
Temp.oC 1 ,5 .7.2
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 5_1:Z __ ---'1 :3} ~
Turbidity (NTU) 10
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged LJ 1.1 J gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I 12.\1
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I ~OO.b.5 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I 0
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs tllA ~--------------~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals tJ 0 250ml 1!J 0 RN03 ~ 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 RN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ..... 17_1_,_K._<f __ ---1 Sample Time IL-\::....'-\.:-D_O~ __ --'
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-28 08-01-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill • Groundwater' Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.~
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
, '. ATTACHl\tE1'71-2 ~()EN.SonA ~: "'RITE 1\tIESA lJRAJ~lU~I MILL ~t)i SeeUlstr\1l;!tion
.~;~...,.~~!!'!!.L-"_~,_= .. ,l FIELD DATA \VORKSHEET FOR GROUND\VATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ~ G~",Aer &(0 ''';''''0. v.-J",f er .2.01~ I
~". Sampler Name
Location (well name): I MW ... .2.q and initials: '-:.J;'-.n~~~-'HeiJ~l~r;::rjl :,: =. J
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging t-I J~/;....:I~D4.,;I2.0"";;;=".L.::;i ~~ ___ ----I and Sampling (if different) AJ/It ----~------------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [][]pump or [9] bailer Well Pump (if olher than Bennet) IL-Q~E..tl!;.D",,-____ -,
Purging Method Used: [IDz casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q\A().:("~e(" t:1 G-~ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I t-_M __ w_, -_~_'5_-____ ~
pH Buffer 7JJI &,...;. ,_J.s..:, • .;;.,.C ___ -' pH ButTer 4,0 l.\.O
Specific Conductance 1,--_'l~,\..:..t}~ __ ........ IJ1MHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): ( )~"1.00 .
Depth to Water Before Purging I lO~. Job Casing Volmnc (y) 4," well:1 \".o.~. 1(·653h)
311 WeU:_ 0 _(.367h)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) ·1
Well Water Temp_ (avg) I ib,,4'~' Redox Potential (Eh)1 \ Z:l Turbid iry I .2-1.:3
Weather Condo l __ --.....;;....4. ________ ----' _ S v,t'\ t1:1 Ext" Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)I......:;..;t....::;!:>;..Ci_--.-l
.. 'I Gal. Purged I ~ i. lib Time 'l l'3l1 \ I Gal. Purged ( '31.b 8: I
I
!
pH I (,.(;7 Conductance Conductance [~k§:~= ~~:J pH I 6,~8 I
a; . Temp.oC Temp.oC 1i~}15 ,I
.. ~ Redox Potential Eh (mV) I-.J --Z...;:r ~~Lj ... ' _----' Redox Potential Ell (111 V) I hs9 I
i Turbidity (NTU) I .:lJ .O I Turbidity (NTU) J:U5 J
.! Time Gal. Purged G i=,i~~. TUne f ,t'!il~,,: ::] Gal. Purged 1,3a.J l I
i j I Conductance YS,!,g pH I '.b& Conductance 1:1'-2.0 I pHn;:~]::J
Temp.oC Temp.oC Ilb ~i I ,I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) t g 2.. Redox Potential Eh (m V) I )gl I
Turbidity (NTU) 1.2. i . ~ Turbidity (NTU) 12 i..S' I
White Mesa Mill
" Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater A 10f2 capturx· COMPATIBLE WITIi/,--IH~J&:r--fUNCTION"LIT
Mill • Groundwate; O'scharge1'>ermit Oate: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7 ..
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ,.2.1 '1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate 1\\"0 casing volumes (2 V)
T= 2V/Q:;; I P-l9 \'i ~ I
I 0
10
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I NIh,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y N
voes 0 0 3x40 m) 0 .0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100m} 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals IKI 0 250ml 0 ijl HN03 t29 O ·
AU Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha O . 0 1,000 ml 0 '0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample vo]ume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is ll$~d, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
~Final Depth I 10'1 .'1 t Sample Time [13'45--= U]
! Sec instruction
1comment
01\ 5. *e <>. t 111;:t. -r <>'M U "" a C-MrI" f< e "",n't tor ru'~~ IMl J.. ~",., f 1;~ "'\Jerri,
? vJ~ bt:~"'~ G\.1-\ \ \5 . ? v..("~~d vl~' \ ~~r tJ:-+0+0..1 rk' \ SO tr)l t1""i-es. v.)~tcr
ho-c\ v... S j;~ht J. is':''''' icr. ·p",~e enJeA "",d. St\r>'\ pie c" lie d·eJ '" t-i3 't3
L-e.~ ~ A~e o(t
; ...
I. ~ a ~ _______ --,IDO not touch this cell (SheetName)
~
on
Ii. ~ ..
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
/
i . :
Mill • Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundw.rter Monit~;ing Quality Assurance Plan (O,AP)
Date: 6/06J201i~ev. 7.
j .... --.. , , '!
i OENISOJ)·· :
"'1!) MINES : . 'r·t.....~·.~ ............... ....,......,
Description of Sam piing Event:
AITAClBfENT 1-2
\VH1TE MESA URAt"lIUI\l ~IILL
FIELD DATA \\'ORKSHEET FOR GROUI\'n\VATER
I ~r3 QW).r't~r G-rc:JU(\4w~'fer . .::l.O};2.. ': ..
Location (weB name): 1L........:;M_w_ ... ..:2.--.!.q __ ~ ______ -"
Sampler Name
and initials:
. Field Sample ID " MvJ-2.'t-Ogoi.2.0)~
~,(J. See mSfl'UCtion
Dale and Time for Purging [~ -==:l and Sampling (if different) .... 1_M...;..r;.:...:I\~ ______ .....i . IJ~-
Well Purging Eq~ip Used:@TIpumpor[9]bailerWellPump(ifotberthanBennet) &..." Q.....:....E _____ P_: ____ ___
Pu.rging Method Used: 002 casings [9]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q~t"i(!r~ &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event. ~1..;...::J/l_vJ_-~_· _____ ___'
pH Btlffcr 7.0 pH Buffer 4 0 y.o
Specific Conductance .... 1 --.l.qq...;..t)~ __ --..IhtMHOSI em Well Depth(O.O 1ft): 112:"100
Depth to Water Before Purging I ) 02.. \ ~ Casing Volume (V) 4tf well:rl.:.f:,.:....a._.'1=--......;...~1(.653h)
3" Well:_" 0 . (.367h)
Conductance (avg) I1Sgq ~~~----------~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) f is . '1 1 Redox Potential (Eh)la-....!.I-'"ttj""--_~ Turbidity,-I ..;..t~_.o_._---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)L-1 ~~y_(I _--I
Time @2~~· .. 1 Gal. Purged I ~·~.'3 I Time 11'10" I Gal. Purged 1~~.8~ I
Conductam:e 14b'l.D I pH I b.Y3 I Conductance [~siS ~. ] pH Jf.."'11 I
Temp_ °c J lb ,Q3 I Temp_ °C 1\2/(1 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) [ l1J I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I l~!> I
Turbidity (NTU) Il~J . I )4.D Turbidity (NTU) 1.\'.3 :Q · I
Time ~1=:=] Gal. Purged J ~'i. Ob I Time II'3 0[S I .' Gal. Purged I ~~ ,::J.1{ I
.' Conductance C9QK:·. ] pH I'.~ I Conductance ~:':::~:] pH I b·'15 I ,.
Temp.oC 115.'11 I Temp.oC [~~~L-:::]
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I }9 Q.· I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I'll> ·1
Turbidity <NTU) f }~J I Turbidity (NTU) I Iq,Q, I ..
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater A 1 of: capturx-COM PATI 8 I.E' WITH/"'-'WU'-b-FO~I(:T10NALI'
Mill -Gr0J.mdwater.Llischarge P~rmit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 1.
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged galJon{s)
Pmnpillg Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
5/60 = I .. .2Ju1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness. number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2VlQ = I 141.1:3 I
() "
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs . ft...._~...:.:r.::..;.~_· _____ --I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if ot.her than as Preservative Type
y N sped fled below) y N Y N
VOCs '0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HeL ,0 ' 0
Nutrjents 0 ', '0 ', 100mi ,:.0 . '0 H2SO4 0 " 0
Heavy Metals ~" 0 250ml :::~' :0 'HN03 ; till " 0-"
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 :' "0 No Prcserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 --0 l,OOO ml ':0 ,' 'D ·' HN03 ,-0 0
Other (sped tY) Sample volume " m ' ':0 :, E1 ~:. 0 ; .,'0 -, " ...
"TDS If prcsctvative is used, spcciry-
Type and Quantity ofPrcsel'vative:
.. Final Depth I lo'-t. '70 Srullple Time l~ lO
I See instruction
~omment
A ... ri~e.\ 0" s:;)-~ ",t leX!, '1N1ner <tIlJ G.,rrv. f'rek~ -torpvl'j<: ",..~ .$.""pji~ ~lIel1+: ., .. "
. P",r~e, bc.~,,, • ..ct I03D, f''''r~e<\ ""~H.ror tJ-~~h\ of 1(,0 1"'1;" .. +':.5, vl"ter ~ #..,. Uft< J.rt:} . rv..r~e. er1ded MJ. -S4f"1fleS corlec1'"J d-+ )'3/0, Len s ;+c d.t )'31$
t---________ ....IIDo not touch this cen (SheetName)
White Mesa Mil!
:
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater A 2 of capturx· COMPATIBLE W1TH~""'Pk--FUH'TJONAlf'
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 f .. ··--.. ···-------·-.1 a)ENISONr;)~~
. MINIES . FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ~_.J See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: 1 3 rdl QJ:o..r"te.1"'" Gfo\.J,.tl{}\ \I.S~=ter ao 1~
Location (well name): ..... 1 ..;...fV\_W_-_3_>O _________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1~t1(1e.r He, 1'la(A~ If).}
Field Sample ill
Date and Time for Purging 1 7/10 7~Olq, and Sampling (if different) L-I /'/.--...,;.i'A....::.-_______ ---'
Well Purging Equip Used: [IDpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ..... 1 Q_E_D ______ .......
Purging Method Used: [][]2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event IQv.~r:JOV=l.!:1 u.-.W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ..... M_W_-_3_~ ______ ----'
pH Buffer 7.0 L-I _7_,_0 ___ ----1 pH Buffer 4.0 Y.n
Specific Conductance L-I _q_'l_~..s..-___ ....II flMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.O 1ft): lL.--lI_o_.o_i'b __ ----I
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 7 h. D..5 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ::;L-;;2...1b 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) "--------'
Conductance (avg) :;2.0S~ '-----~-----~ pH of Water (avg) L-I -LJ..:..." 2.1C:!.5~ _____ ----I
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \ :'.56 Redox Potential (Eh)1 ?-.j\ TurbiditYa....1 -=0:....-_---'
Weather cond'l L-_C_\elA; __ Y __________ ----I
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)a....1 _:J...()_iJ_----I
Time 1 1055
Conductance 2..05,5,
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I \bSI
Conductance l ::.to 59
Temp.oC I 15.56
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Gal. Purged 1 ,",\~,qo
pH 1 7.~7
()
Gal. Purged I c\'~. g3
pH 1 7 .q:s
6
Time I I05L Gal. Purged 1 y 3 . Co ,
Conductance 1 ~o bl.{
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2..Y3
Turbidity (NTU) o
Time I \Osg Gal. Purged I q L). D S
Conductance pHI 7,25
Temp.oC I 15.53
Redox Poterttial Eh (m V) L-I .2._35~_---,
Turbidity (NTU) I 0
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I . 'J..Jl T = 2V/Q = I ;2.04.'32. I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I \ s.e.+ ~ '-l 0 CooS. A \V ~ 1.-
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs Hl D 3x40 ml D ~ HCL ~ D
Nutrients III D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 KI D
Heavy Metals ~ D 250ml ~ D HN03 ff] D
All Other Non Radiologics m D 250ml D m No Preserv. D 1)?J
Gross Alpha ItI D 1,000 ml ~ D HN03 "iJ D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D tfJ D l$I
&cnel'o.\ ~Y'\o~(J\.'t'\~GS If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth L-I 7_~_._b_' __ ---I Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-30 07-10-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 _M_w_-_3_1 _________ .....
Sampler Name
and initials: 11"C:(\(1e.r-Ro] h t.\~ /Tl1
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 77 q / ::2.0 r'l and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [!TIpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 002 casings [QJ3casings
Sampling Event I (;)v-.o..rted;>i Gil\) Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1 M W-3?...
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0
Specific Conductance 1-1 _~_Ci_q ____ ..... 1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I bog .lD
Conductance (avg) ) q ?,..S L..-~ __________ ~
pH Buffer 4.0 Li.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 130.00
Casing Volume (V) ~:: :::::1 '-\:.~ ;" t'
pH of Water (avg) 7.SQ
1 (.653h) '-\ 0 . '-12.,
(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \S,X<t> Redox Potential (Eh)I-I:z.s __ \ __ --I Turbidity II-_0 ___ .....1
WeatherCond. 1 ?IA'}~ C\ouJ~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) .... I ~_()_O __ ....J
Time 1 )330
Conductance
Temp.oC
\'i3D
Gal. Purged 1 i 0 . :2.4
pH I /\S~
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 2., 0
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 13~ Gal. Purged 1 ~O ./2..
Conductance pH 7.53
Temp.oC 15.30
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1-1 _2:_9_9 __ --'
Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time .... 11_'3_3_1_---1 Gal. Purged I ~O.50
Conductance
Temp.oC 15.30
Redox Potential Eh (m V) lL-i0E):2:_· __ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) o
Time 1 \'333 Gal. Purged 1 <6('). t-til\
Conductance I-ll_q~~~1 _--' pH 17·053
Temp.oC 1 }S.2..7
Redox Potential Eh (m V) .... 1 :L_LtS _____ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = Lo.-I ,_2._\1 ___ --' T = 2V/Q = 13/2..5-"; I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 10
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1}S'WA1...) .s~+ '* \J 0 c.~ I J -r\ Y)
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml 0 "fJ HCL t:I 0
Nutrients iLl 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 rtJ 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml -r:J 0 HN03 tJ 0
All Other Non Radiologies I!I 0 250ml 0 -t1 No Preserv. 0 ~
Gross Alpha rtJ 0 1,000 ml rJ 0 HN03 "1tJ 0
Other (specify) l!I 0 Sample volume 0 rb 0 '[]
&d\eC"CA\ ~1"o("~IAf\'\ (5) If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth Lo.-I _{;Cf_, g_7 __ ----I Sample Time ..... 1 _\3_~ ___ ----,
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-31 07-09-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
[---·-·· .. ·-.. -· .... · .. -.. -· .. ··-· .. ·· .. ·······1
ji.·.OENISO. N. ~.4~1' . MI.NIES ,
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
~ r~ ~,,"(fGr G-rOUl'd W ~=fe,r' :;LC 1!2
~ See instruction
Location (well name): I ...... M_w_-_3...,;;:;l __________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~Y\n~r" 110 11"J~hN
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 71 ~ ):;"0 \ Q. and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: IT[] pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 002 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q"'lA,-+erl~ c;..W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-1_N_f._Ii _______ -I
pH Buffer 7.0 7,0
Specific Conductance L-I _---'q~4~g __ --II ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I 1L\ .75
Conductance (avg) -:sq 07
~-~------~
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I ' 3~\5 t)
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 ~ 7.71 I <.653h)
3" Well: ...... ---::.:;D __ -.l. (.367h)
Co./3
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 15.1 g Redox Potential (Eh)1 J.K5
Weather Condo
Time 1L-'_'3:>_H_5 _.....I
Conductance
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 13)~
Conductance I ':S~ VC;
Temp.oC 1 1$ .llS
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU) 1
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Gal. Purged I 77. D3
pH G,/3
19~
C;IS
Gal. Purged I 77.LJt
pH 1',71
1
lB'q
(0,7
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event}L-1 ~~O_o ----';---I
Time ..... 11_3_1_1 _~ Gal. Purged I 77,::2..5
Conductance I '31;)..2.
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ..... 11.;....8_b __ -.I
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I 13 }3
Conductance 1 ;If J 0
Temp.oC 115 .19
Gal. Purged 177., G8
pH 1 tO~7:;;"
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 .... 1-"g ..... Y _____ ----'
Turbidity (NTU) 1 G.4
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged 7g.)~ gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ~ 2. )"7
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I 3'"1'"1. Sb I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs .... 1 N--!...:,/ ~ _______ --I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha tfJ 0 1,000 ml ~ 0 HN03 ~ 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I is. 0 , 5 1 Sample Time &-1_'3--::'5=--__ ......
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-32 07-09-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
MiII-Grol..':,\Jwater Discharge Permit
GrOUndw;ter Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.:
: Jl LJ I " .; llENJSO ' ._ ._ i _ ..
A TT ACIB-1ENT 1 ~2
\VIDTE l\fESA URAi"(JUM ~ULL , .;;'J~ Sec instruction
-du_ A!J.~~~~~ FIELD DATA "'QRKSHEET FOR GROUND\V A TER
Description of Sampling Event:
Location (weI) name): W-3S ~~~~------------------~
Sampler Name
and initials: I-r;:"\.nn(!('" Hpu;J;;; l rW
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging '-lj....:./_)_O_/~_i .... ~~ ___ --' and Sampling (if different) I,-,/'J,--:...:.~A~ _________ .....I
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [9] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ,-I Q-=-~-=:D~ ____ ----,
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings [9]3 casings
Sampling Event I Gh~.,......ted 1 G~ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I,,--M_W_\-_~_~ _______ .....I
pH Bll ffer 7.0 1s....._I...:.--. D ___ ---" pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conduct~mce ~I _~...:.Ci...;..4~ __ ___"IJlMHos/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): 11~\j ,50
Depth to Water Before Purging W~l)=:J Casing Volume (V) 41t well:1 7 ~ 'lD 1(0653h)
3ft Well: 0 (.367h) ~----
Conductance (avg) J.-.-_4..a...;:;..O.:;..?J;;:.;;D~ ____ ..... pH of Water (avg) 1'-~'~!l.IooiSt.,,;;;;~~ ___ ----J
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lb. tot , Redox Potential (Eh)~i&. . ____ 1 Turbid ity t-I _0 __ ----,
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)I ________ --'
Time I ItjO.5 I Gal. Purged I \b.~] I Time I )liO~ . Gal. Purged []~:~D
Conductance [~q~r=::=J pH IG.g£, I Conductance I ~4i.jLi .
Temp.oC Ilb,qO I Temp.oC
Redox Potential Ell (m V) I ::1...07 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 20,5
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I . c I
Time I i~01 I GaL Purged L ~:J()_"_::'~':.-J
Conductance 19lJi I pH [~;~:1
-=
I
Temp.oC I lb -'f ,", I Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;Zoo I Redox Potential Eh (mV) &...1 .r..Jq~g"'---_----I
Turbidity (NTU) I tl I Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
field Data Worksheet for Gr<lundwClter
Milt • Grolrzdwater ~jschafge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.
Groundwater Monitoring QualitV Assurance Plan (QAP}
Volume of Water Purged
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1-.1 -:;," ~......;.1....;;.·1 __ ---I
gallon(s)
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If wcJl evacuated to dryness. number of gallons evacuated
I e
Name of Certified Analytica] Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs [~A\.._i ~ 6£iio~1 ":f\
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample jf other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs BI 0 3x40 mt 0 El.1 HCL Ei
Nutrients ('B 0 lOOml 0 m . H2SO4 [B
Heavy Metals Irl 0 250m) -m 0 HN03 ,Ill
AU Other Non Radiologies [XI 0 250011 0 'S No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha ~ 0 1,000 ml 1$1 0 HN03 fil
Other (specify) m. 0 Sample volume '0 ~ 0
G-Gflef(>'\ ::rnor9~n',-.s If preservative is used. specii)t
Type and Quantity of Preservative,~
.. Final Depth ~I -.....:1..;...V-')~..;..lJI-.·1'--. _ .....
I
Sample Time
,~'; See instruction
!comment .,:,:~
. A« i\led () l'\ ,,<1-e .... t \:2.'-15 . -''''''rler ~ 1'\6. G-",,, ; f\ P ce~,rI-.t'e.., pw~e. IAn A .so."'l' 1;0 e \l<!11 t
P w-~ b~(.\" tXt-~')O . P 1M ~e<\ I.)t 11 -tor !J-. --\-ct... \ of' 80 M I f\ ",,+es .
~",ie(" ~C\~ LleC;\(r PtAr~e eY1J e d c.V)ct ..sl\rvlf"e~ (,OIle.l+~J. c~i t'iJD . LefT SJ;tc 1~~i
, 0 .. ..
i
~ ~
'--__________ ...... IDo not touch this ceH (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
'm
0
5J
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I OENISONII).4~ r···_······_····· __ ··········_············_··_·_-_··_-.. ~
{MIN~S J
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
13('3\ QUOfA,..ft:r G-f"ov.(\d \f\)(A-rer 201=t
See instruction
Location (well name): .... 1 .:...M_W_-% ___________ ......
Sampler Name
and initials: r~tlt1lr ~ol1ll4..jlt]t
Field Sample ill
Date and Time for Purging .... 11_1_1_\ 1_1..._D_12...;...... ____ ...... and Sampling (if different) ;VIA L--_________ ~
Well Purging Equip Used: rnupump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I .... Q_E_D ______ __'
Purging Method Used: [!JJ2 casings [gJ3 casings
I Mw-I\ Sampling Event 1 QV-G\rt",r~ &\J Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1-_________ ----1
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 '-lot)
Specific Conductance 1-1 _tj.;....q_~ ____ ...... 1 !lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 J~ LbO
Depth to Water Before Purging 11) 0,55 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 7.:2..1 ICo653h)
3" Well:L-. _() ___ ....... (.367h)
Conductance (avg) L--y...::l.....;~_S....;;g~ _____ __' pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \5. tl1 Redox Potential (Eh) 1 3 g::; TurbiditYI,--_O __ ~
Weather Condo IL-__ <:.. ___________ ...... _ ~ v\')'\'"'~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)IL-:2_1_· __ ......
Time 1 O'ilD
Conductance 1 ~qSb
Temp.oC 1 \5.70
Redox Potential Eh (m V)
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 Oq\~
Conductance yq~O
Temp.oC 15.bO
Redox Potential Eh (m V)
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Gal. Purged \J.~'
pH I/.dJ
:3~~
D
Gal. Purged 111.111
pH 17.2.0
o
Time 1 0 (.111 Gal. Purged 117,5J
Conductance 1 y q !;3 pH 1-;.2.0
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I ~::;...;;;;.g7~_---,
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 0 4\3
Conductance 1 qq&3
Temp.oC I LS. t)l
Gal. Purged I} B· 0 I
pH 17.2.0
Redox Potential Eh (m V) &...:1 .3:::...77-=--__ --'
Turbidity (NTU)
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged \~.'19 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ~ 217
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I "".50 I
10
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I J.}WAL 1 .set or Vo (.s
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs ~ D 3x40 ml D III HCL EJ
Nutrients [11 D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 rn
Heavy Metals rn D 250 ml rn D HN03 [1J
All Other Non Radiologics r:E D 250ml D ~ No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha ~ D 1,000 ml rn D HN03 rn
Other (specify) nI D Sample volume D f£I D
G-O"I~('(A' 'I~oreo.(\'(..> If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 111.~<b Sample Time I 641 S
Comment
~ See instruction
Af"t;\}t:.~ on ~;'h~ (1\-1 0"14S. -r"..f\1\t.r D\.n~ Crtl\rr1f\ p'('e$~n'; .t;,r ?",r8(;: ~nJ.. 5~fV)pl;n~
?v-.r~e be8o.f\ oJ OJ5~. Pv.~~e~ ~e\\ ~(" #:... -totoJ ~ ~S Y\'l;l'\u:\e~, ~~+C(" w~~
Gle().(' thrbv..~~O\A.t th~ }>lAf6'· P~j~, e1Jded qf\tA So."""p}e.s <.ol1~c+tJ a..J-o CfJ5,
L~+1 5\'te dl..t o~;22)
MW-36 07-11-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
rn
D
m
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
r---------·-·-·~ i OENISONI)~~1 j .. ~INES _ FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 3f"J\ Q\A(A.('+ef" Gl'"au,(\a ~+e(" :!iO\.2.
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1-1 _M_W_-_3_7 _________ ---I
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 J~htr Hoi ha~7Ti-1
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 71 \ ~ / Q..o )2.. and Sampling (if different) 1-1 _7_'I_:lO_J_.Q_,,_J_t< _____ ......
Well Purging Equip Used: [gJpump or CQ] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1-1 M_Y;_~ ______ --I
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 Q\J\(AnGrG c;:W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I-_M_W_-_l ~ ______ -I
pH Buffer 7.0 7. () pH Buffer 4.0 q,Q
Specific Conductance 1-1 _'1_£:f_q ___ -I1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I l~l . go
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 107. 301 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 Q.'1D 1(.653h)
3" Well: 1-. _O __ -......I.(.367h)
Conductance (avg) 1-1 _Y:,...Y.l.-Lf..;...2.. ______ --I pH of Water (avg) 7 ·'3k
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 1 q .t15 I Redox Potential (Eh)1 3£3 Turbidityl ~
.23,~
Weather Condo I fo..rll~ G10I.AJ~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)l .... l_7_o __ .......
Time I 0 b!L9 Gal. Purged 5 Time Gal. Purged
Conductance 1 4q4 ~ pH 73& Conductance pH IL-__ ---'
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) .e:::;L2_b..;;;;.3 __ -......I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ___ -......I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 :2.3.~ Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 13 go 1 Gal. Purged o Time 1 1'~99 Gal. Purged ~O __ ---,
Conductance 1 q Y BE pH Conductance 1 YQQ7 pH 1 G/IO
Temp.oC ;X1·16 Temp.oC 1 Iq,80
Redox Potential Eh (m V) a:gc Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ;t---.;::5:....,.~ __ ......
Turbidity (NTU) 1 q, 1 Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
C:>-e1-0~~
V olume of Water Purged "'-1 """T\-:-~:-------' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I'---_D ___ --' T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I Lqg
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ~\.JAl-I 5>e:t of 00(50 I -r;11
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs '1J D 3x40 ml D li1 HCL ~ D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 129 D
Heavy Metals ~ D 250 ml ~ D HN03 'E D
All Other Non Radiologics ~ D 250 ml D LI No Preserv. D ~
Gross Alpha 1IJ D 1,000 ml '"1:J D HN03 ~ D
Other (specify) [@ D Sample volume D 1EJ D AS!
&~Y\er~ \ :!no'("cS (). n \ (.5, If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1 ..... 1_;l._L....;;fo'--I __ ---' Sample Time )340
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-37 07-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
rOE~,s~-~1j1~1
( MIN~~ ,~
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
1 3r~ Q""o...1"'h·, GfOu..1'\~ lA)O\.t~r ..2,OJ?..
See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 ..;...lJi..:....;W'----.=bS=-_________ .......
Sampler Name
and initials: l~flTlt(" +JO]}J·JA~hr.r
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 7/ 11 !~O 1 <.. and Sampling (if different) 1#/,4
Well Purging Equip Used: [][]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 Q\ACArte.rl.;\ &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event II-_jVl_vJ_-_J_~ _____ ----I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance 1-1 _'1_'...:..1 ___ ----J1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 '2.1. ~.3
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 ~2. Y l) Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ";>8. yg 1(·653h)
3" Well: 6 (.367h) '------_ ......
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) 7.10
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 1.b.~D Redox Potential (Eh)1 ) g 3 TurbiditYL-1 _0 __ ......
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)L-I.Q_~_' _----I
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pH L-.I __ ----I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1'----___ ......
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pHL-I ___ ......
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) L-I ___ ----I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged D gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I lO,S T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I A\VAL 1 ~dOf \)0 Cs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs ':tJ D 3x40 ml D ~ HCL ~ D
Nutrients !J D 100 ml D ..-f] H2SO4 eJ D
Heavy Metals 1tI D 250 ml ~ D HN03 rJ D
All Other Non Radiologics ~ D 250ml D ~ No Preserv. D ~
Gross Alpha lJ D 1,000 ml tl D HN03 'EJ D
Other (specify) "[] D Sample volume D i9 D ~
(,.e(\~('~\ -:r:",O~l'\~(..S If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1-.1 ..a...;) 1...,;.7_. 0_' __ ----' Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-65 07-11-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ~ See instruction
r------------------------------------------~--­I OENISONI)~.4
j MINIES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER -.<----~----.-r"-="'...,O,\---,.....--..,.---"-----------.,,,.----t----------------. Description of Sampling Event: 13 ( Q",,,,,-t<.1" G-""O\U,J\w~+G(' -:l.CJ2,. 1<e.s~r"I1pJ~
Location (well name): ,-I _M_W_-_f:_S _________ ----I
Sampler Name
and initials: --r;.Ylfle-(" )O:)C)",'a~RH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 gIl f:./2..Dl";.. and Sampling (if different) /J/A L--_________ ~
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or IT[] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ICllT1+U'hAOUS
Purging Method Used: IT[] 2 casings IT[]3 casings
Sampling Event 1 Gl.AlAlfe.d~ G-\J Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I .... __ I\J_!_A _______ ~
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 _Gf_4_'t ____ ...J1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 };2..1.'63
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 ()3. q 0 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 3 7 . .5.6 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h)
'-------'
Conductance (avg) ,-I _3_t4_~_5 ______ --, pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 14·'105 Redox Potential (Eh)L-ll_5_9 __ --' TurbiditYL-1 _0 __ ----1
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)I,--)'1_o __ ~
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pH L-I __ ----'
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (m V) ,-I ___ ----'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pHL-I ___ -I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Redox Potential Eh (m V)I L-___ ~
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged o gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I , 0 . SD T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs iVIA ~----------------~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs lJ 0 3x40 ml 0 II HCL t1 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1 120.00 Sample Time 0640
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-65 08-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
1~~~~i).4]1 .~.INES . ....--J
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
1 3ra G5"'CA.r:t~r G('ou..J'\J\)j~fer ~c,::z::
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1 .... _/JI_W_-_7_0 __________ ---I
Sampler Name
and initials: I :=:r~(\n~(" Hol]/a~/1'H
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 11--7 _1...;;1 g:;...;/_:2_D_l_Q. ____ ----I and Sampling (if different) I .... N_~_~ ________ .....I
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump or @] bailer
Purging Method Used: CQJ2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv..().r+~rl.~ G-w
pH Buffer 7.0 11..-_1._,0 ___ --1
Specific Conductance .... 1 ..... ~ .... ~~~ ___ ---'I !!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I g~·..20
Conductance (avg) r....;1 S=-~.....;:g:::;.;g=-_____ --I
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ,-I Q_~_D ______ ---I
I MW-J8 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '-_________ -.....1
pH Buffer 4.0 I '1,0
Well Depth(O.O 1ft): II..-Q-,-7_, D_O ___ --I
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 0 IC.653h)
3" Well:1-5-~-0G---I.(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lb ,lg Redox Potential (Eh)L-1 ...:.,3;;.,..;1-1..1_----1 TurbiditYL-1 _0 __ ----1
Weather Condo Ext'\ Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) .... Ia2_1_() __ --'
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pHI L-. __ ----I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (m V) 11..--___ .....1
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
. Conductance pH Conductance pHL-1 ___ .....I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Red"ox Potential Eh (m V) .... 1 ___ -.....I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 15. 66 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60= I ,,~~
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I '1B.f,~ I l1g'b~
o
o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs #/A ~----------------~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals 111 0 250ml 1$1 0 HN03 [1J 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) TEl 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 m
+10u.,~je. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I q~ 17..5 Sample Time I OCf.:!;5
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-70 07-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabC
Field DataWorksheets Accelerated Monitoring
TabC1
Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
August 2012
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 ,----------------------------------1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL OENISONI)~~I ~_~~.!!~n:~_~ ___ .,_J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 Av~u~ t (V\ ~(\.t''''' \ Y &r-a ()V'v~ W D.J t-(..J("' 20) ~
Location (well name): 1&.....::..JV\---"\..a..o:,_..J....I.\ .... J _________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials:
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 liS I Q 7/2Q k ~ and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
~ See instruction
.AlA
I QEP
Purging Method Used: [][]2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I M Q!I\ t"" 1 i 6m" .. ..A"",,,,fui Prev 0 Well Sampled in Sampling Event I M vJ ../ ;LS
pH Buffer 7.0 7, 0 pH Buffer 4.0 1-i ,0 I
Specific Conductance 1-1 _~.!-q..!...-!.Cj __ --'I ~MHos/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I
Conductance (avg) 2 ~ 7 q
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 '),7. $'l I <o653h)
3" W ell:L-. --'0""---_---'. (. 367h)
7~Y\
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 16, ~6 I Redox Potential (Eh)1 ]:3 g Turbidity ...... 1 _~O~----I
Weather Condo I 5 CJoI'vA.1
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)lL..-...;..l -:.Cf_b_---'
~---------------'
Time 112.1> Gal. Purged 1 SE ... 55 I
Conductance 1 ~g7g pH 1 7J 3$ I
Temp. °C I 1 b ... "3 g
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1""'---.....I.J=S...:.7_---'
Turbidity (NTU) 22
Time 112g Gal. Purged
Conductance
Temp.oC
2<l76 I
1G.0,", 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
pH
£b qg
1-,'1:2-I
Time I):; 7 Gal. Purged 5SJ 7t I
Conductance 2~ 7q I pH 1 7, ~ ~
Temp.oC 1(,/37 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 1 '57
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I 11 ~9
Conductance
Temp.oC
I
Gal. Purged
2gg3 1
1 G .. ~7 1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 1 ')J I
Turbidity (NTU) 0
I
1 of 2
-tJ
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I • 1. 17
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I 25 ~,,1.>17 I
AlA
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1L....L.;t/~A~ _____ ----I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients D D 100 ml D D H2SO4 D D
Heavy Metals ~ D 250 ml ~ D HN03 ro D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I gS. ~~ Sample Time 1136
See instruction
Comment
A,..r\v~~ 0""-.sit~ 0....+ 070f!, .. &a...t'~',A. !J..J./\.,,r.. 1p.,..1I\.N"--e..r' ff"'l.J~e,Ar-9t/r' (Jvr~f....J ~~
.s~~Pli~ Gve....-v+-. f\)r-'i>~ bv~t}...v'V o....-t--07~O.. Pvrbe..rA we../J pCJr-' ~60 ~;Y\.0 t~.s·
Wc-f~r' W()....$ £ le.~t"' tk.'bVj\k. t7(/~ fvr1:>~' L.e..p~ s;-tr:.. A..-Y l )3S'.
MW-11 08-07-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r"""" --... ----.-----.-.----.----.-----.... ---.--.----------.-----,
iOENISONI)JJ j ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ~ See instruction
; MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER ~escri;,t;; of S-ampling Event: I AY.b,Ut MDv\. J-:l,v\y G-,..o.!",,/)l\. . .Jc...tr-A ;;2,0/2
Sampler Name
Location (well name): I f1 W .... I Y and initials: I bo..r11"", ee..lM(C /6 e
Field Sample ID IMW-'J ~ ... O£072oI2.
Date and Time for Purging I 6g /07 J 20 .;;L and Sampling (if different) ;VA
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 00 2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I YVlOYl·H".1 t O..,.uMJ,w""f,jl Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1 !1 W~ '30
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance 1-1 _9_q .... q.a..-__ .....I1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I 1 D 3 • $ b
Conductance (avg) ~ gg~ "----~=-----------~
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well: I
3" Well:
I G :2. "1..1 (.653h) (3 _(.367h)
pH of Water (avg) L---S..6~'k...::~!::::...:!...J ____ --'
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 16 .. () 2 I Redox Potential (Eh)1 .:3 7/:; I TurbiditYI'---...lo6~_.....I
Weather Cond. I-1 __ 5_u_Y\_V\J_i.!......-_______ .....I
Time 1:317 Gal. Purged
Conductance I 387:2. pH
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ZqJ
Turbidity (NTU) o
Time 1 1319 Gal. Purged
Conductance '3 ? 1:L 1 pH
Temp.oC 16. C'7 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ;57b
Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 '20 b
Time 1"3) 8
Conductance
Temp.oC
Gal. Purged
3g<l£ I
16,103 1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I .3 ~ I
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I I i3 fAb
Conductance I
Temp.oC
I '"
Gal. Purged
:s&~:s I
} b.,D I ·1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I :3 5 tt
Turbidity (NTU) Q
I
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I t 2)"1 T = 2V/Q = I J Y Cf ( VI cr I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated /VA
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs AlA
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients D D 100 ml D D H2SO4 D D
Heavy Metals ~ D 250ml ~ D HN03 ~ D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 1 0 1../ .. ';3 D Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
A,\\ve;~ t/o/'... S~}e-c.-..t--\0:5£. 60...;-;\11\. ().,~ rtNAV\J~r ff"GI.st:.Af-' ~c>r fvr}j~ /J...NA
S.o..VV\fl·\~. Pv,....,~e.. h6~t....N 1 £>~O .. PtJrf!:/~,;t we.Al 9'~ ~ 1-otA.\ of 16 ~ JIV\ ;"'LJ-re.sj.
w~t(..(' -V>(,c..,J l--o~~evr-1--''''-''00..6'--0\.1+ f t>I"'!) e.. l.JL..-9.a-.s:~te.. ""-+-] "3;2.7r
MW-14 08-07-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
i ------------------------j i OENISONr.J~~!
I MINIES ! FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER _____ .. "' .... __ ~ ........ __ --.J
Description of Sampling Event: I A\Aa""~+ &ro",,)J W(1\.tc-(" ~OJ~
~ See instruction
Location (well name): IL-..:..M.L..,;'\jJ_.-.::...:L!......;S~ ________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1-r;Y'lne,-)...Jon /da,:4 h'J-}
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ..... 1 __ 1s'=-",-!-=b-,-/_~_D_l_'l.. ___ ---, and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 002 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I MD!'lthQl G-W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event l~fo1_IAl_'-_3_1 _____ ----,
pH Buffer 7.0 1L-1~\O ___ -.I pH Buffer 4.0 11.0
Specific Conductance ..... 1 ----:.q...:.~...:.q ___ ..... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): ..... 1 _11_~_.O_'O __ -.I
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 7~, 80 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 :2". q b 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '-----_ .....
Conductance (avg) ~ ':l. ''-\ '---~~~----------~ pH of Water (avg) L_b_.5_::l ______ .....
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \S. ]q Redox Potential (Eh)1 ::,51 TurbiditYL-1 3_" 0 __ .....
Weather Condo
Time ' ..... 1:..:..1OS=_-.I Gal. Purged l .s l.\" 2. S
Conductance 1 ~202. pH
Temp.oC 1 1S.~D
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 3bB L........:=-=-=~_.....I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~.)
Time I 1101
Conductance
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V)
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Gal. Purged 1 set C)g
pH 1 b15~
'b'17
~_D
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 ~O(5
Time r.....:.ll..;.::l D;....;;:b:::...--.I Gal. Purged 1 S 9 .Y.G
Conductance 1 3;2.1lJ pH 1 ~-5~
Temp.oC 1 \S.g~
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~53
Turbidity (NTU)
Time L-I \ ..... \D~8_-.....I Gal. Purged 15 LJ • 'l 0
Conductance 1 "J;2..2.Z pH 1 ",Sb
Temp.oC 1 LS.7~
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ..... 1 ..;;;3;...;;,3_"1 __ .....1
Turbidity (NTU) 3.1
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 11--4-.;..2.._'--.;.7 __ ---1 T = 2V /Q = I7-S t L13 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I ...... ~_/...;..'A-=--______ .....I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml
Heavy Metals m 0 250 ml
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume
Final Depth I 7:5, &S Sample Time ....... I l...:...ll_b ___ --'
Comment
MW-25 08-06-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Filtered
y N
0 0
0 0
[i. 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Preservative Type Preservative Added
Y
HCL 0
H2SO4 0
HN03 ~
No Preserv. 0
HN03 0
0
If preservati ve is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
1:1 See instruction ~~
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
i--·--··-·----··--··--·· -........ -... ··-·-·····-1
i ()ENISONI)J~1
i MINI:S I ,----~---.-
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
I Au.~ 6-ro~nJl\No...Ter '2:01-:z...
~ See instruction
Location (well name): II-JII_W_-_jJO ___________ ......I
Sampler Name
and initials: I:::r:.t'l(ler HoJ)iJ~/..-rH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 8/ cc>/ .2..0)0-and Sampling (if different) ,..;//1 ~~~-------~
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ICo(\+;t\lAOu..s
Purging Method Used: [QJ2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Mo)'\=t"'8 &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I-M_W_-_'3.S ______ --l
pH Buffer 7.0 7 .0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance ..... 1 _'1,--~_~~ ___ ..... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I \.2.) .33
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 f, g , J 8 4" well:I 2:>~ .10 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '------~
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) 31.3f. '--~~~-----~
pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 J5." Redox Potential (Eh)1 J 2..5 TurbiditYI-I _0 __ ----1
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event} 1-1 ?-_g_o __ .....
Time 1-11_3_W __ --' Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance 1I-3....:)~3_b __ .....1 pH 1 ~.bO Conductance pH L..-I __ -----'
Temp.oC 1 15.7J Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1L-1_?i5.....;;;.. __ -.....t Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ___ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) 10 Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pH 1-1 ___ --'
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Redox Potential Eh (m V)I I-___ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
-~
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ) O. G
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= [§ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) ID
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs Io...."'-tJ.....;I_A ______ ----'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml 0 1!1 HCL J&l 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 '&l H2SO4 m 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 ~ 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ll3 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 IKl
Ch'o('~J~ If preservative is used, specify
lDS
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I l10, 0 \..1 Sample Time 11...--13_3...:.1 __ ----'
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-26 08-08-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 r ~~:;~-~:Ij~-~'I WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
__ ... !'lINES I FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 Av£)v.$.} ;v\oV'o.~v..,\'i &\,olJv''vAwov1'if
Location (well name): L....I .:....M~W::::...-.... _3.:;...;O=--________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials:
Field Sample ID IMW-::30_ D £072:0t2.
Date and Time for Purging 1 D8 I/)7 I ~c> \ ~ and Sampling (if different)
~O\2
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
~ See instruction
AI/A
, QED
Purging Method Used: 002 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event IMdIl'lY'v-.\'I G ... O!)~v..>c-+-d Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I-.L..M----=-=W:.....:.....-.....J_3---=--J ____ ---I
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance 1-1 _.....I1~q!.-q-"--_--J1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging ' 75r'3 s? I
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
lID
4" well:1 ?:L'&J 1(·653h)
3" Well:L-. _~O __ .....1.(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) , J~" L12-Redox Potential (Eh), ..3 )8' Turbidity 10-1 ---:::D~_--,
Weather Condo L....1_S_c..>_V\_V'l._'I ________ -----' Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) 1-1 ...:...1 q...:...o __ --'
Time IQ~6 Gal. Purged Time I 16~1 1 Gal. Purged 1 Ll!:j! 70 1
Conductance pH Conductance 1 :2.0.613 1 pH I b.~~ 1
Temp.oC 16~63 Temp.oC I 15,65 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Reltox Potential Eh (m V) I 32.~ I
Turbidity (NTU) C2 Turbidity (NTU) I (1) I
Time I 1 6 2. 2= _ I Gal. Purged Time I 10.23 I Gal. Purged I Y~d1 I
Conductance pH Conductance I ~05~ I pH I I1wCjS I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I J3.3F I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ':3 J 3 Redox Potential Eh (m V) I "3O'Q I
Turbidity (NTU) D Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I II ~17
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I :lOY, ltd I
NA
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs '---__ N.;...:A ......... _____ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below)
VOCs D D 3x40 ml
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml
Heavy Metals ~ D 250 ml
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume
0~\ OI;~6
Final Depth I 7~ .. Oh Sample Time
Comment
A ""'\"";\)-0 rJ... OoA s; t~ 0.. ~ 0656, GtA.,... ..... ;lf\-o...rI\..~ -r &v~o/'VtA'
e..ve,.V\v-h, fvr'5~ bt!J .!)~.N tl-,.4-' 66'5, We-t'e-r' WOwS
We.\\ -Pt?f" ()... +c9+'e-1 t!JS? 2J.5 M\t\V+c..S. L~+'
MW-30 08-07-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Work~heet for Groundwater
Y N Y N
D D HCL D D
D ~ H2SO4 ~ D
jgJ D HN03 ~ D
D D No Preserv. D D
D D HN03 D D
D ~ D 181
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
~ See instruction
P"'~~AI ~ Po-r-P VI"'".b ~ o..~ .s~N'\.P\;~
t; \ Gc...t' -}k,rov~lA.o u+ P l/f'he.. Pt>rf>e..~
S~.re.. ~~ I ()36.
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
iJ
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
1 A \A e \A~+ C; ("'O\AY"\o\ W fA. >ref' :.l.0] ~
~ See instruction
Location (well name): &....1 _M_W_-_3_\ _________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 =rtJ\f)7'~r RolIJj~.<r
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 ZIC,I!l.012> and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: I~ Ipump or [QJ bail.er Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [1[]2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I jAon+hld GW Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1&.....M_0-_~ _______ ----I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D pH Buffer 4.0 g.o
Specific Conductance &....1 .....;q_ti...:.~ ___ ----II /lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 ]30,00
Depth to Water Before Purging I b~. 1 ~ Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 q O. '39 1(.653h)
3" Well: l) (.367h) '----_......I
Conductance (avg) &....1 _]_42_15 _______ ...... pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) Redox Potential (Eh)IL-..'3_'_O_-......I TurbiditylL-2--:;;;;;·3 __ --'
WeatherCond. I PO\rl-~ 610\Ad~
Time 1 r~10
Conductance
Temp.oC 15. gZ1
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I r~Jx
Conductance J':Z:5
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Gal. Purged I gy. b3
pH 1 b :=]g
Gal. Purged &5.06
pH 1'·92)
I ;J.., '-J
Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)&....1 ~_l> __ ......1
Time 1L-'_3_11~----, Gal. Purged 1 ~Y. gy
Conductance ''107 pH I 6 .. 81
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ~_}_3 __ -......I
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I f::,:~~';!~~.) , I }~1~al. Purged I t'S.5OS
Conductance 1'1::2..7 I pH I G·1G
Temp.oC J5,gg
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L..;;.1.2.----:;;43~_-......I
Turbidity (NTU)
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged ~5 .71 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1 ,,:;2.17
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 37~t30 I
6
C>
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs Is-M_Vi_fd ______ ----'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 1!1 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ill 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 'r9 0 Sample volume 0 'ff;J 0 ~
TD~ If preservative is used, specify
S"'W().~( Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Gh 1oridc:
Final Depth 10..-1 7_0_.q~1 __ ......I Sample Time 10..-1 ...:..)3---.;;..tS __ -----'
See instruction
Comment
Arr~ve.J 0(\ S ;+~ . "'+ 0&35, t;..nner "',,;), & ... rf':" f'r~~n1 -For P"'''<3c:. ",nJ...s /AMf>llj
evevr}. ?w·-~e. b~~OI.fl <1\+ D£LjD. H,.(~eO-\11\(.1\ +0, '" +01-."\ of' 3% y>1 l no.+es,
W.Je,... V;')o..S. dear +)., .. o"'~), ov.t -the f''''(,~-e.. f'v..r~e en olea M J.. -SL!rr)pJ l'n,j
+oov. ?'tA(e. 0..+ 13lS_ L-e,# ~Jie. ~ 1'311
MW-31 08-06-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 r'" -.-.. -............ -...... --..................... -.... -I
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL i OENISONI)~~, i MINI:S I FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Descri~i~n of Sam~ii~g Event: 1 Av..'iJ~S:.f (rrov.r\c;twOvtef""' ~OlQ.
Location (well name): .... 1 _M_W_ .... _6_S _________ ---'
Field Sample ill
Sampler Name
and initials:
~ See instruction
Date and Time for Purging 1 ~/~ /20)~ and Sampling (if different) ~/A '--~~---------'
Well Purging Equip Used: [Qjpump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1...1 _Q_~-=D=-____ ----I
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Moof\.. l::I 6-W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event IL.-M_W_j_l ~ ______ .......
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance 1...1 _~.;....q~~ ___ ....J1 !lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 J 1 :l.. SS
Conductance (avg) LJ I SD L--__ ~ ____________ ~
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 12'1.5 0
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~/_._t:f_3_----I1 (.653h)
3" Well:, 0 ,(.367h)
6,73
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 lS.IS Redox Potential (Eh)1 2.-'l-Turbidity I ..... _6 __ ---'
Weather cond·1 .... _G __ 'e_C\_( _____________ ---' Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ..... 1 _~_()_b _-......i
Time ID830 Gal. Purged 2.1.7
Conductance
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 _2._~ ..... 3,---_--,
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I Og3~
Conductance YISq
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V)
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
6
Gal. Purged 1 a...~, 13
pH b.i't
D
Time 10 831 Gal. Purged 12.1. 'f 1
Conductance ..... 1 ~_'_5_~_---,
Temp.oC 11S,IS
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1L...:2=-'~1.J.-_----I
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 O~33
Conductance I LJ 1l{5
Temp.oC 1 15.15
o
Gal. Purged 1 ~.33
pH 1 6.79
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1L-:L--=..5 ,l...1 __ ....J
Turbidity (NTU)
1 of 2
-iJ -iJ
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged ,;).:),.18 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I · ~17 T = 2V/Q = I "13.1:2-I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs IL-M_~_~ _______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients D D 100 ml D D H2SO4 D
Heavy Metals rE D 250 ml ~ D HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha 'E1 D 1,000 ml tl D HN03 ~
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 11)3.0 g Sample Time I O~3S
Comment
~ See instruction
Ar(;~ cd on ~ 11-G <At 0 b '-\.5, ~n her "'" J-6-MI';n preSGnt-.for pv.('~e o<1ld. .s."."., ?),~ e \Je,t.
Pv.r~e. b~<>." ..... -r O{,5Q, r \A,~ed ~ell .for .... +0+" \ ot 16::' m:.,v..-Tes,. L0,,-+u W«..s clea ...
1-hfOUcl'0u"t" r)\A("~ Y\Ar"{)e. -ended. 4.f1~ SGMpk coll~~ka 0..+ D835. L-c.ft s}t~ a.t 0340
MW-35 08-08-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
[--.. ----.. -.-.-.-.. --.-.. --.--.-... --.----.....----1 ATTACHMENT 1-2 ~E~~liI)JJj FIELDDA~:r~~=::E~~~~~:O':;~DWATER ~ Seeinsttuction
Description of Sampling Event: 1 A Jf,PJt MOrA. ~ \ 'I &(""l)~ W A,;.yd Za"} J).
Sampler Name
Location (well name): 1 JV\ W ...... b 5 and initials: &: Arlr r ivy P ty\lIVvk=C I () P
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 d <II CJ7 J 20 I 2. and Sampling (if different) AlA
Well Purging Equip Used: [IDpump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 002 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I..".. 0 VI H, 1 i ? r 0 Li"';' w ",,+;a Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I jV\ t-J..J 36
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance ..... 1 _......:CJ:.-Cf..!..-LOf __ ...... 1 [!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I 10:>.; ~6 1
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 1 t; 2~1(·653h)
3" Well:L... _~I2~_.....I.(.367h)
,4.61
Well Water Temp. (avg) Redox Potential (Eh)1 :375 Turbidity 1 Q
Weather Condo 1L-__ 5_J_v\_vV~i ______ ---I
Time 1 1 3 ) 7 Gal. Purged
Conductance 1 "3 ~72 I pH
Temp.oC J .5 .. q7 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;39 I
Turbidity (NTU) I
Time I 1 '3) ~ Gal. Purged
Conductance I p ~Of Z pH
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) :370
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
I
:3ul.,66 1
6~y6
3LJ ,:;0 I
6*~~J
Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 :zoe>
Time I 13)g' I Gal. Purged I ~t..l, 2~1
Conductance I 3tg5 1 pH I 6 .. t>J q I
Temp.oC I 16.,Q:5 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2g1 I
Turbidity (NTU) r C!> I
Time I 13~Q I Gal. Purged I -::h!d Ii 7 ;2 1
Conductance I "3~g3 I pH I t"Sa' I
Temp.oC I 16~(j.J I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~5~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
1 of 2
-'\J -'\J -'\J
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60= I A 2r7 T = 2V/Q = I p:fctt tj c:r I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs D D 3x40 ml
Nutrients D D 100 ml
Heavy Metals ~ D 250ml
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml
Other (specify) D D Sample volume
Final Depth I lOY J :3 0 Sample Time l32J
Comment
MW-65 08-07-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
AlA I
/lJA I
AlA
Filtered
Y N
D D
D D
lL[ D
D D
D D
D D
Preservative Type Preservative Added
Y
HCL D
H2SO4 D
HN03 ~
No Preserv. D
HN03 D
D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
r-:J See instruction
~(}!l
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
2 of 2
TabC2
Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
September 2012
-1,
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
,-----------------------------------------------------------------~-------I OENI'SONI)~~
i MINI:S '----. -".--~-
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
1 Sep6P'\be.r moY\+l-,b 6ToVV14} C5OJd" ::tOt;)..
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 _M_W_~J_l __________ .....I
Sampler Name
and initials: fiO.nner f.}OlIlW!'1t
Field Sample ill INIW-)1-64\4 '2.D lQ...
Date and Time for Purging I'---.q_/_I'f..;..../_:)./)_I_~ ____ ____' and Sampling (if different) 1-.1/V-i_~_A ________ --,
Well Purging Equip Used: []I] pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I ..... G_f:._D _____ ____'
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I rv1 o1\-}b 10 G--W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I-. M_W_-_~ ______ ____'
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0 pH Buffer 4.0 y,o
Specific Conductance 1-.1 _~;....'l_~ ___ ----'I ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 1:)0·00
Depth to Water Before Purging I ~ 7 I ~ 4 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:I..2,·Y.b 1(·653h)
3" Well: D (.367h) '-----_ ......
Conductance (avg) L---.....:.2.,~g~-r..L::s=-____ ----I pH of Water (avg) ..... 1_7 _,4...;..7 ______ --1
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lS. ~'1 Redox Potential (Eh)1 75 TurbiditYI.-I 0 ___ .....1
Weather Condo IL--_G_)_c_a.._( _________ ---' Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) 1-.1 _18_b __ --I
Time lL..-l.L::3~Y;""'{)_----J Gal. Purged 1 ~q.~
Conductance 1 Q.....87l pH I g.Dg
Temp.oC 15,3"{:
Redox Potential Eh (m V) go L--___ ......
Turbidity (NTU) o
Time 1 l~ '"1 ~ GaL Purged 1 S'j, 6 g
Conductance pH
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 _7_tt'---_---'
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time 1.-11:...;:3::;...'1_'_---1 Gal. Purged 1 SLJ. L]Z
Conductance I ~7~
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1L--'_7 __ ____'
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 1~Y3
Conductance 1 ~S81
Temp.oC 1 \5, :sg
D
Gal. Purged 1 5'j ! 4 ()
pH 1 7.tfJ
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ...... 7_'a ___ --'
Turbidity (NTU) D
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 55.33 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ,;2. 17
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I ;2..53.)3 I
o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type '-y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients D D 100 ml D D H2SO4 D
Heavy Metals m D 250ml ~ D HN03 t3
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I t,6· 6 f) Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
Arr:~tA 0\,\ ~~i-e. lkt D'l~S. -r/Mlt1lf ~Y1t1 G-o.r("i" prdc:rrf t,r ?\Af":~~r" ~J1a SUn') p))'~ e\Je!l+.
f\A.r~e.J be~M ~ D'l3D. p~('~~c\ ~el\ tor If\. +e>1-A.\ of .:lS5 yY);..,v..+<:,s.
\J..)O\.1-er \N~ G. '<'b..("". P"'r~~ ~n~ c,d. b\"~ s~ple c l11J~ G1t!A ~ 13 LJ5.
Le,.&:'}-~ ~tG ~ 13t;1
MW-11 09-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
2 of 2
-lJ -tJ
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r------------------------------------------------------------------------------------,
IOENISO. Nf)j. j l
J M1"tI:S . .=J
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Se. ?!~ r-<bcr rVtoY'rl'l/\8 G-roun J W~+Gr-
C:::~ See instruction
Sampler Name
and initials: 1-'1IA.Tll1e-r HoH,'Ja.;1 /r1t Location (well name): IL.-..:...M..;.-.vJ_-..:....)\1...1...-.-_________ --'
Field Sample ill M w -114 _ OG\ \ g 26 l~
Date and Time for Purging 1.-1 _~...;../..;...:}g::...A/;....;;2...;..O_1_'2 ____ ____I and Sampling (if different) 1.-1 M_V~ ________ --,
Well Purging Equip Used: []!]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) Q'E.D 1.--_______ --'
Purging Method Used: 00 2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I yV)ont11~ &\J Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I L-_M_W_ ... _J.S ______ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.'0
Specific Conductance I I.-_'f..:..~~~,---__ ---,I ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 \ O?:>. q t)
Conductance (avg) "3 ~ ~ I.-----------~
pH Buffer 4.0 9.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 l;tg'.7l)
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:r 1..;;;;.-b -L-" } q":'----II<.653h)
3" Well:. D .(.367h)
7.13
Well Water Temp. (avg) l Ib, 17 Redox Potential (Eh)1.-1 _fJ_Q. __ ......I TurbiditYI.-I _{) __ -......I
Weather Condo iL--_C __ \ C_0--_6 ________ ---' Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) 1.-1 ~ __ o_---,
Time I l~~S Gal. Purged
Conductance pH 17,a:s
Temp.oC 1$·\9
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 89
Turbidity (NTU) o
Time I 13~7 Gal. Purged
Conductance I '3121 pH 1 7 .10
Temp.oC J5114
Redox Potential Eh (m V) go '-----_......I
Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time 1 14~b
Conductance I '3 ~ 3~
Temp.oC
Gal. Purged 1 -:s \ .. b g
pH 1 7 .])
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1.-1 _;g_~ __ -......I
Turbidity (NTU) Q
Time I 1 L1 2.g Gal. Purged I ~. 1 J
Conductance I 3., Z8 pH 17. Q g
Temp. °C ,,-I _,.:5 ___ 2_0_--,
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I 7_1-'--__ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) o
1 of 2
-iJ -iJ -~ -iJ
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I .. .,.J7
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I \ Y C\ ,2S I
o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1 .... r.l_IA _______ .......
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals lJ 0 250ml III 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I \OS,S~ Sample Time IIo.....:..-IQ_3_0 __ ----'
Comment
~ See instruction
Arri\J-eA
'P"'r~e.
P\J'f~e.
on ~:·h~ ~.} \\'S7. l~nY)"C!r ~~ G-6.rr;f\ 'Pre~er7+ .foc ?",rje An" .slt/)'Jf)j~j even-f.
bc:~(,..l') ~1-)2.Cb. ?v..("~cA well -for fA. -tato..\ at 15D yvl:rl"d .. o. ~~1~r w~.s c.\.e~(
e(\~e~ 6:.'\1 St1\Mp'e (o\\~(.+<.~ lk-t l~~D. L~-tt ~,-tt:, 1\1-1430.
MW-14 09-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
;_._ ... ------------------------:---------_.,
I OE ~F3ltl).4~
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Se.p\"eMbe.r jl\antJi )~ LrrouY)d V\SDvfer :2.01Q.
~ See instruction
Location (well name): IL.-...;..A_\j\)_-_~ __________ ......
Sampler Name
and initials: l--rO-fl n~r-Ho)} I a~ ITt}
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 '" 71 ~ 72.0 )?... and Sampling (if different) 11..-.M--..;...0_~ _______ ____I
Well Purging Equip Used: IT!Jpump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1-1 d_'S_D _____ --I
Purging Method Used: 00 2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I ]"\()nt~fu G-W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I..-_M_W_-_~_I _____ ____I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance 1..-1 --.;4;..,..'\...,:.q ___ ----'1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 115.DD
Depth to Water Before Purging 173, bD Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 2:1.03 1(·653h)
3" Well: D (.367h) '---""-----'
Conductance (avg) 1L..-~_2_2_ .. 7 ______ ----, pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \5.0D Redox Potential (Eh)1..-1 X_46 __ --' TurbiditYI..-I 0_·7 __ ......
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) 1..-1 _15_°_---'
Time 1..-1l_1 _~O __ -.....I Gal. Purged 1 Sb.Y Q.. Time 1-11;....1_5 _'_----' Gal. Purged 1 5,G, b3
Conductance 1 32~~ Conductance 32.Z~
Temp.oC 1 l~.O\ Temp.oC lS.OC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1..-1 .2_4'1 __ ----'
Turbidity (NTU) 0.7 Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 L....: 1...;...15_":l. __ -.....I Gal. Purged 1 S6. is Time 1L.:..1.;..,..;J5;:;..3 __ --I Gal. Purged 157.07
Conductance pH 16SZ:: Conductance 1 322S
Temp.oC 15.60 Temp.oC 1 \4. '11
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (m V) L.,;.12S_~ __ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) 0.7 Turbidity (NTU) 0.7
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
-'1> -1J -~
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged 57,50 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . .2.1/
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ,2L./4./{; I
I 0
o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs IV/A ~--------------~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals m 0 250ml I2l 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth lL-l...;..S_, 6;;....D ___ --I Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
Ar,:ve:a
?IA{"~~
?\J\.r~-e..
01'\ ~irc. 0\.+ O-r2.Y. -(ru'W1~(" 1to\1:J~ fr~e'r:!-~r f~"'je.. (1.n~ .sG\fVlp}ir1~ evert1.
~~'" ~+ 0""130. 'f'.M~cA ~d\ tor "-to~ • ...\ or ;I.e..!) M;fI",-t<:.~. W ... +"...-WOoS-c1c"'f
~()~ej, tA¥)~ S~r)~'c. c.o\\e.c.t~ ~+-IlS~. Le-f}-~i+c. ~}-lIEL.
MW-25 09-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 I:E~;~~~1)11
i~~_~INES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: , S.e?1"et1')be r YY1on1't1~ l1,..
b;)~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
]
Location (well name): ..... , _M_W_-AIo __________ -.J
Sampler Name
and initials: '~n"e.(" H~)JJa"'~/--rJ-}
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 'L---__ 4..1.'-/.....;1...l.1 .:../.;,..,.1...;.;;",O..;,..,I'2.. ___ .....J and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [][]pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event 1m 011 til b G-I>J Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1L...-t1_W_-.....;ll~ _____ ......
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 g.D
Specific Conductance ..... , _q_~_1 ____ ..... ' ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 'J.21.3'3
Depth to Water Before Purging '.5g .. ~O 4" well:1 Yl· 1.5 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L...-___ .....I
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) L...-3_j....L.....,;lg~ _____ ---' pH of Water (avg) 7·YD
Well Water Temp. (avg) ,):="q I Redox Potential (Eh) ..... ' _1_5_1 __ ..... Turbidity ..... ' _I._D __ --'
Weather Condo C \-eiA/ Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)' ..... ;).._\.._'b __ .....1
Time L-'l_9_0~4 _-.....J Gal. Purged b Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH ,7.40 Conductance
Temp.oC I rs.O\\ Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) \5\ Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ___ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pH ..... I ___ ......
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ..... ___ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged () gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ]0,5
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 6
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ..... I.,./,_'/_A-_______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml 0 "tJ HCL ~
Nutrients tl 0 100 ml 0 t:I H2SO4 'El
Heavy Metals tJ 0 250 ml a 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
C'" 'or-;b.( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth IL-'_O_D.!-f qs~ __ ......J Sample Time 11-,.1;.....Y_lD ___ -......J
See instruction
Comment
Arr;"c~ 0" 5\+<:. ~
S~f'Q (. o\l~(,4G~
\1.\0\, -)1\t'\1'\if ~na. 6-bJ'(;'" f'e.~ 1z> c.ol1-<.ct .$o\.~ples~
/k+ \'110. \N().1-er WD.b c ko.r . Lt:.-+t s~'h~ ~~ Jlj 13
MW-26 09-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
E
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
~ See instruction j)ENISONl)j~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MIN(;S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 5e.preMbCI M~+h13 G"rOlAYlaCA)~+-cr ;20124
Location (well name): IL--M_\I\)_-_3_D _________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1~I171e"'" HoIIIJ~X+t
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ..... 1 tf..;.;..J_I't......;I'--2.D __ \2 _____ ...... and Sampling (if different) I ..... /\I_/,_~ _______ ----'
Well Purging Equip Used: [J[]pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L...I 6<_E_D ______ -'
Purging Method Used: [ID2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event 1 rYlon=thll1 G-vJ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I L... M_W_-_l ~_~ ______ ......I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 g.o
Specific Conductance ..... 1 ....;..~_q1..L..-___ ...... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 110.00
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 75, 8S Casing Volume (V) 4" well:I .2.2,.,~'I 1<·653h)
3" Well:L-. _O ___ .......1.(.367h)
Conductance (avg) 2-07b L--_~ ____________ ~ pH of Water (avg) L...-.I7..;.;... $..c::::; __________ -'
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 '5.3\ Redox Potential (Eh)1 1 gS Turbidity 1'----0 __ ----'
Weather Condo
Time 1 ..... _11_% __ ----' Gal. Purged 1 '-11.7'"\
Conductance pH I g,LS
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) \7/ L..-!.."":"'-__ ......I
Turbidity (NTU)
Time ..... 1 .J...:.]]~:L..;...;;7 __ -,
Conductance
Temp.oC 115,31
D
Gal. Purged 1 4~, \7
pH 17.91
Redox Potential Eh (m V)I L-1;.....:4 ...;..1 __ -.......1
Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ..... 1 }_3_b __ --'
Time 1 J }2...b Gal. Purged 1 Lf 7. iTs
Conductance 1 ';)..073
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1L....:\:..;;:g~9~_-.......I
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1.....:11....:..;1 :2.;...;;:8~_.......I
Conductance 1 :?-oG;4
Temp.oC 1 1S. ':YJ
D
Gal. Purged 1 y Z.3Gf
pH 17-}3:5
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1L--111_' __ -.......I
Turbidity (NTU) o
1 of 2
-j.,
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ,2.17
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ~05,5~ I
10
10
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs N/A ~--------------~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients 'lZ!l D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 .B1
Heavy Metals E D 250 ml ~ D HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D 181 D
ChloJl'~-c If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth L-17.:...'l.:...:..~1j .... 4 __ ----' Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
Arr i u-e~ 01\ ~ ,-teo.,J-0,'-10. "";'nVlt:r-Nl a Ifnrr: "l P f>GSt:Y1-r -r;,..... p v.1'.j ~ "",,,( :s q,.., pJ/".j
P"'r~e.-be~~t1. ~t 07'15. f \Ar~ .. J. 1iII-e1l ~o,... '" +,,-\-.. 1 "f' 22'S Mif\"'+~
V)o-.h" W% ckar. P"'r~~ ~YlJetl 1l\J'I~ Sa"'pJi::) cal1ed~~ ~t J)30 .
L. e.f\-~l+ t:.. ~t-ll3Co .
MW-30 09-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
~
2 of2
-/J -'iJ
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: SE.pfCM ber Jv\on+~8 &-ro~n~ wGtf~r .9-.01~
kl_J See instruction
Location (well name): I...."M...:.w~ ... _3..;;...\ __________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: I""-;:nner HoJ1/J~~ 1m
Field Sample ill
Date and Time for Purging 1 ql If< /2..0\'< and Sampling (if different) I;-J/A
Well Purging Equip Used: IT!J pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I M 0 ",tb \'=1 (7 \J Prev 0 Well Sampled in Sampling Event II-_N_/t_~ _______ ----I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 1...1.0
Specific Conductance 1-1 -..Jql...l.~...1..1 ___ ----11 !!MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 13 O. DO
Depth to Water Before Purging I b ~ , Cc Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 tJ D}-lg ICo653h)
3" Well:l-. _D ___ --I.(.367h)
Conductance (avg) I G1 Y 3 ~-~~-----~ pH of Water (avg) 7,JD
Well Water Temp. (avg) I-I1_g_'~ __ ----I Redox Potential (Eh)l2. t..t b TurbiditYI-I ..;:;;:g~,7~_--,
Weather Condo 1L--_~_1 _t::._o._r _________ ....... Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event}lL-l:.-.;;S;;.-.6 __ --'
Time Gal. Purged 1 gO. 2q Time Gal. Purged 1 gO.56
Conductance Conductance 1L-1.:...q=-.Y...:..q_----I pH I 7,10
Temp.oC Temp.oC 1 }Y,87
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1a.....c;.;;6 ::...t4.=5 __ -I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ..::;..:2.:.~~:..;::Io::::,,-_--,
Turbidity (NTU) 1 g.£:, Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 )~:l7 Gal. Purged Time I 132.r Gal. Purged 1 to. CJ l..J
Conductance ...... 1 __ 171 __ % __ ---' pH 7.10 Conductance 1454 pH I 7.10
Temp.oC Temp.oC 1 lY y Zf I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ~_Lf __ S __ --I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
-iJ
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gl.37 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in 1pm.
S/60 = I . ~ , Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q=1373./Y I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1L-N._7._A ______ ----I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 'i;I 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 19J 0
"lDS If preservative is used, specify
S~\to:r~ Type and Quantity of Preservative:
0h\o,;ae
Final Depth I 7 J • ;lS Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
Arr;\}e.~ on ~i+e.. 0..1-0/10. -rq..nnet' Ho\l;a~ y:>-r-e.-~ent f'o.,-?\.Ar~e "Vld. 's<XMpl:f1j evet1f .
Pv..('~e., befJo..A fA.+ 0715. f",("~-e~ lNcdl -tor-"'-+01--0..) 0+ 375 m;Y1v..+~.s, w~+er wa..s
yv10~1-'~ c.\co..c +~ro\A~~ov..~ ThG f>v\r~c. ?lAr~l:-endoJ. '\nA S4MpJe.,5 Go)1e.G-hJ, qt
\ 3'3D. L~ ~l+c:, V\t )~'3'-t
MW-31 09-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r············· .... ·········· .. ············ .. ······ .. 1 ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL l OE~~~~.p.4~ FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 15ef)+-GMbe.r rYJontl1k1 6-t"O\AytJ lAh.-r-<,t" .2D12
Sampler Name
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 11-l"1~w_ ..... _3S __________ ---I and initials: 1-rQ.Y111 ~r -B oj h'JJlf,~ft1±
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ! L-4...:.;../--.;.1....;..~.;..../ :;1._0_12. _____ --' and Sampling (if different) ! ..... _M_Y_~ _______ --,
Well Purging Equip Used: IT!Jpump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)! L-_Q_&._.D _____ .......
Purging Method Used: 002 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event l 1Ylon-th1,j Crw Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-1_M_W_-'_3_D _____ ---I
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0
Specific Conductance 1-1 --:,4_lf _~ ___ ---II ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I /J~..33
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I ');i9,50
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" W ell:~1-,-.---,~---"t1_--I1 (.653h)
3" Well:. 0 . (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) !14. ,6 Redox Potential (Eh)!I-J_h_8 __ ....... Turbidity ..... ! 0--..:.--/7 __ ....... 1 0.7
Weather Condo Ir....-C_kA_{ __________ --' Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)Ir....-13_" __ ......
Time O~ll)
Conductance '"'\\1\
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 041l...
Conductance I 9] Gt
Gal. Purged I J6 .~7
I D.) I
Gal. Purged 1 1 b .7b
1 pH I ".go
Temp.oC lL\.C::b 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1(5
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time 1-1 O_<:f-:.'J_---I Gal. Purged I 16.41
Conductance I 11 l7 ~
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 .....I.)-.:..7....;;;;c:J~_ .......
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I O~ 1:3 Gal. Purged I 1 b,q~
Conductance pH 1 (;.g)
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1-1 -..:i....;:::b=5 __ .......
Turbidity (NTU) 10.7
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged 17.'::>£:. gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1 • ;2.17 T = 2V/Q = 1 73.;t.9 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs /VIA ~--------------~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below)
VOCs D D 3x40 ml
Nutrients D D 100 ml
Heavy Metals ~ D 250 ml
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250 ml
Gross Alpha ~ D 1,000 ml
Other (specify) D D Sample volume
Final Depth 1 113. 5i Sample Time O'f IS
Comment
Y N
D D
D D
~ D
D D
KI D
D D
Y
HCL D
H2SO4 D
HN03 ~
No Preserv. D
HN03 ~
D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
r::;3 See instruction
~<Zl
Arr'ue.A on .sij-e, .d--0150, -l.:l')n(/ "'1). G-eVril1 presurd---Qr pl..lQl"-t<YIJ .s ... mpU~ eW?t'/i
1"A(,~ hoSo..n (At 0755. 'P \Ar~e~ ~el\ -t6r t7v -t()t~l of go MJ'"v..tes.
1N000t~r w~ Glet>.r +1J r0't~ ),0"'+ pu.r~c:. 'P \Af.j eo -d1 tid IlfI A s'IJ-VlpJe (o}}edcd ~-t oq l.s, Lett S'1c O\.f 042(
MW-35 09-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater M,onitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
II ()ENISONl)j~ l---------------.-.-.-.. -.. -.-.-.-.----~·-·.-·--------.-.---.. -..
MINI:S t--, ____ ..
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
,SoLptc.l"'\bc:r Mori+h8 6I'DU."a WCA..t~r ;:2.0\~
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1-' _fJ._W_-_b_S _________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 1~nne.r f}o}hdl~)fH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ' ~ JI4/~O'2.. and Sampling (if different) ,I-.I0_VA-________ ---I
Well Purging Equip Used: I]Dpump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1-' _Q_lt_D _____ ----I
Purging Method Used: [!IJ 2 casings @]3 casings
I ,MW-30
Sampling Event' M0r1+111~ rrW Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1-_________ ---1
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance 1-' ---..;q~'1_q ___ ---J1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I 11~, '3:3>
Conductance (avg) 1.1 1,0 '----~------------~
pH Buffer 4.0 I LJ, 0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I ,~q, Stl
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 ""1.'1'1 I <.653h)
3" Well:L-. _~ __ ---'.(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) , }I"L bO Redox Potential (Eh) , 1 b g Turbidity' 0.,
Weather Condo G\eCAf Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)L-' _'3.....,..-°_---'
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pH L-I __ ----I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ___ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pH L-1 ___ ......I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (m V) 11...-___ ......1
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60= I '~17 T=2V/Q= I 13.~Y I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ,.1\//11 ~----------------~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients D D 100 ml D D H2SO4 D D
Heavy Metals "tJ D 250 ml E D HN03 ~ D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha "EJ D 1,000 ml ..g] D HN03 "fI D
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I ) 13 ,S ~ Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-65 09-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
TabD
<:2uarterly Depth to Water
TIME WELL
832 MW-1
1127 MW-2
1324 MW-3
1325 MW-3A
1032 MW-5
1027 MW-11
1036 MW-12
1009 MW-14
1011 MW-15
1331 MW-17
829 MW-18
759 MW-19
1308 MW-20
1300 MW-22
1043 MW-23
1124 MW-24
1005 MW-25
1103 MW-26
841 MW-27
1121 MW-28
1046 MW-29
1049 MW-30
1059 MW-31
1053 MW-32
1018 MW-33
1014 MW-34
1041 MW-35
1015 MW-36
1012 MW-37
Static
level
64.30
109.80
83.11
85.15
106.45
87.85
108.49
103.71
106.45
74.36
70.17
54.19
85.63
67.05
114.15
114.25
73.55
74.59
51.46
76.45
101.95
75.82
67.81
74.36
dry
107.94
112.35
110.46
107.25
NAME: Tanner Holliday, Garrin Palmer
DATE: 9/27/2012
TIME WELL
944 MW-4
942 TW4-1
945 TW4-2
938 TW4-3
949 TW4-4
935 TW4-5
948 TW4-6
943 TW4-7
940 TW4-8
937 TW4-9
932 TW4-10
947 TW4-11
952 TW4-12
954 TW4-13
956 TW4-14
1103 TW4-15
1101 TW4-16
1053 TW4-17
849 TW4-18
730 TW4-19
932 TW4-20
857 TW4-21
931 TW4-22
1055 TW4-23
929 TW4-24
845 TW4-25
1057 TW4-26
958 TW4-27
Static
Level
72.04
64.85
67.26
50.15
70.13
56.81
69.74
68.17
66.55
54.67
55.95
56.96
41.09
46.90
86.45
74.59
59.37
74.36
57.30
59.99
59.95
54.19
53.10
64.45
54.70
49.31
63.11
82.35
TIME
801
756
752
1004
1001
847
842
746
750
834
824
837
826
804
822
818
815
807
810
821
814
811
743
1154
WELL
PIEZ-1
PIEZ-2
PIEZ-3
PIEZ-4
PIEZ-5
TWN-1
TWN-2
TWN-3
TWN-4
TWN-5
TWN-6
TWN-7
TWN-8
TWN-9
TWN-10
TWN-11
TWN-12
TWN-13
TWN-14
TWN-15
TWN-16
TWN-17
TWN-18
TWN-19
Static
Level
62.08
27.04
41.47
47.74
42.75
53.06
23.66
34.00
43.40
69.55
75.17
87.86
62.20
62.60
80.85
69.50
27.34
45.81
62.46
91.91
47.71
33.79
57.95
52.50
TIME WELL Static Level
NA DR-1 ABANDON
NA DR-2 ABANDON
1203 DR-5 83.11
1207 DR-6 94.44
1021 DR-7 92.22
1216 DR-8 51.05
1212 DR-9 86.52
1210 DR-10 78.1
1317 DR-11 98.3
1321 DR-12 88.85
1328 DR-13 69.99
1227 DR-14 76.39
1312 DR-15 93
NA DR-16 ABANDON
1230 DR-17 64.97
NA DR-18 ABANDON
1234 DR-19 63.25
1245 DR-20 55.5
1251 DR-21 107.37
1238 DR-22 Dry
1248 DR-23 70.66
1241 DR-24 43.84
NA DR-25 ABANDON
TabE
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Quarterly Sampling
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
WW\Y.energylab.com
MaIyticaIExcsUBflC' Sines 1952
Helena, MT 877-412 .. 0111 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
.. ~!lIefte, Wy 8&6.;6B6~7n5 • Rapid City, SO 888~612~1225 • College Station, IX 888~690~2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C12070741 ~001
Client Sample 10: MW~02_07162012
Analyses
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
0.9
0.2
0.1
Units
pCi/l
pCi/l
pCi/l
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Qualifier RL
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/16/12 12:45
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
E900.1 08/01/1209:30/1bb
E900.1 08/01/1209:30/1bb
E900.1 08/01/1209:30/1bb
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 3 of 27
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
AliBlytical ExcsllBflCB Sines 1852
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings. MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
gilletJ:B, WV866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANAL VTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
Client Sample 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070741-002
MW-03_07182012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Fluoride
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
0.96
51 .1
Units
mg/L
ug/l
Qualifier RL
0.10
5.0
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/18/1209:55
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-F C 07/23/12 12:281 jba
E200.8 08/05/1209:551 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 27
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExCBnBflCI Sines 7952
Helena, MT877-412-0711 • Billingst MT 800-735-4489 · Casper, WV 888-235-0515
~fllett'e,WY 8&6~686-7n~· Rapid City, S[} 888-672-1225 • College station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070741-003
Client Sample ID: MW-03A_07192012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
3700
5720
99.3
o -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/l
ug/l
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/19/1207:00
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date / By
o 20 E300.0 07/25/1222:54/ wc
10 A2540 C 07/23/1209:201 ab
5.0 E200.8 08/13/12 13: 15 1 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 5 of 27
.1
I
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
WWiY.energylab.com
Analytlt:al ExcsUBflCB Sines '951
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WV 888-235-0515
~Hlerle, WY8&6-&86~7175 • Rapid City, S[) 888-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
Client Sample 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070741-004
MW-05_07162012
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
0.75 ug/l
Qualifier Rl
0.30
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/16/12 14:55
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date / By
E200.8 08/05/12 10:041 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 27
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-11_07112012
Collection Date: 711112012 1210h
Received Date: 7/12/2012 1345h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/13/2012841h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Surr: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
2037-26-5
1868-53-7
460-00-4
17060-07-0
50.2
54.2
53.0
54.9
50.00 100 77-129
50.00 108 80-124
50.00 106 80-128
50.00 110 72-151
Report Date: 7123/2012 Page 14 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
t P 1 t . r 1 r f' . f i 'n . n ' . t . r f . f ' hi, . .
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
;:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-001
Client Sample ID: MW-11_07112012
Collection Date: 7111/2012 1210h
Received Date: 7112/2012 1345h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Tin mg/L 7/2112012 1734h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
A _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
This sample was not digested pursuant to the client request.
A
Report Date: 8/28/2012 Page 5 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
~l1h5::p.nnp.nt 11~'" nfthp n:;tn,p nfthlc;;o "(\"""'T'HlIT'i'\1 nT' ~"nl ,..,..."'l"YIh .... ,.. "f'';to C!t"l.Ff" ..... ,.. ................. ..-1" .... +;,.... .... n.f'+l.~ ..... " ... " ............. '"' ....... "'''+~ ........ ~o.+t. +l.. ......... A" .......... ! _____ ... __ ... ~_ ... ! ______ 1 __ C' __ •• __ ~ .1._ ... _ ••.•••• _ • ____ • -.' ',1 ,1 1 t' • t".1 • , r
•
EI'-ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Ana/ytiC81 ExCl1nBfll:. Sines 1m c. . 'ffele,na, MT 877~412-011 f 11 Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper,WY 888 .. 235-0515
,., L J~i:r',~n~', WV.'~,6 .. ~B6~7115 • Rapid Ctty, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, LX 888·690~2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12070448-003
Client Sample ID: MW-11_07112012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TOS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
374
66.5
39
0.48
19.6
0.66
ND
7.4
618
1080
2020
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
204
NO
135
NO
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
0.73
NO
NO
0.3
0.1
0.2
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCilL
pCilL
pCilL
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/11/1212:10
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
A2320 B 07/13/1218:201 jba
A2320 B 07/13/1218:201 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 14:551 sf
A4500-CI B 07/19/12 14:441 wc
0.10 A4500-F C 07/13/12 13:581 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 14:551 sf
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 07/17/1212:48/1r
0.1 E353.2 07/16/12 11 :50 1 Ir
0.5 E200.7 07/18/1214:551 sf
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 14:551 sf
50 A4500-S04 E 07/20/12 11 :52 1 ab
10 A2540 C 07/13/12 15:51 1 ab
5.0 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1215:231 cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
25 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
30 E200.7 07/18/1214:55/sf
1.0 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/12 15:231 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
20 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
5.0 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
0.30 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
15 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1207:141 cp
E900.1 08/08/12 22:251 Ibb
E900.1 08/08/12 22:251 Ibb
E900.1 08/08/12 22:25 1 Ibb
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
o -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 6 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
AflBlytical ExCBllBflCB Sines 1!152
-Helena,MT 877-412~071 t • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
; ~JlIe.jt~, WY8~6~686,;7115 • Rapid City, S[) 888-612-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/11/1212:10
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070448-003
Client Sample 10: MW-11_07112012
Analyses
OAT A QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: T oluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
3.65
29.8
32.1
2000
1.00
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
92.0
92.0
80.0
91.0
MCL!
Units Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date / By
% A1030 E 08/08/1216:021 sdw
meq/l A1030 E 08108/12 16:021 sdw
meq/L A1030 E 08108/12 16:021 sdw
mg/L A1030 E 08/08/12 16:021 sdw
A1030 E 08/08/12 16 :02 1 sdw
ug/L 20 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:161 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/1200:161 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:161 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/1200:161 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/1200:161 jk
ug/L 20 SW8260B 07/24/1200:1 61 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/1200:161 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/1200:161 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/1200:161 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/1200:161 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:161 jk
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:161 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:161 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:161 jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7 of 54
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
Analytical ExCBDBllCI Sines '952
Helena, MT 877 .. 472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WV 888-235-0515
.'~i.II~~e, WY 86&-686-7115 • Rapid City. S[) 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070741-005
Client Sample 10: MW-12_07172012
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
20.7 ug/l
Qualifier RL
5.0
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/17/1209:40
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
E200.8 08/05/12 10:091 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7 of 27
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-002A
Client Sample ID: MW-14_07112012
Collection Date: 7/1112012 1235h
Received Date: 7/12/2012 1345h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/13/20121133h
Units: !J.g/L Dilution Factor:
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Compound Number Limit Result Qual
Tetrahydrofuran
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
CAS Result
2037-26-5 51.4
1868-53-7 54.8
460-00-4 55.2
17060-07-0 55.2
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
50.00 103 77-129
50.00 110 80-124
50.00 110 80-128
50.00 110 72-151
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 15 of 41
.1
I
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-002
Client Sample ID: MW-14_07112012
Collection Date: 7/11/2012 1235h
Received Date: 7/12/2012 1345h
Contact: JoAnn Tischler
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Tin mg/L 7121/2012 1739h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
A _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
This sample was not digested pursuant to the client request.
A
Report Date: 8/28/2012 Page 6 of 41
~.l~"~:.~:~:~.~~~l!:~~l::~~h: .. ~~~,_~~::,::~,.an.d.~~.~,are p;~o~~~ in accor~nce to ~LAC protocols. Pertinents.an:pling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
EI\ERGY
LABORAT ORIES
www.energylab.com
Allalylh;al ExCIIUsnc. Sine, 7152
Helena, MT 877-472~071 t • Billings, MT 808~735~4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
.. ~ . <~'!I'e.tta, WV e66~686~7n5 • Rapid City, S[) 888~672·1225 • College Station, IX 888-690~2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12070448-004
Client Sample ID: MW-14_07112012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TOS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
466
494
19
0.15
151
NO
NO
12.2
351
2070
3600
NO
NO
1.26
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
2100
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
73.1
NO
NO
0.2
0.1
0.2
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pC ilL
pC ilL
pCilL
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/11/1212:35
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date / By
0
A2320 B 07/13/1218:281 jba
1 A2320 B 07/13/1218:281 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 14:591 sf
A4500-CI B 07/19/1214:45/wc
0.10 A4500-F C 07/13/1214:09/jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 14:591 sf
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 07/17/12 12:50 /lr
0.1 E353.2 07/16/12 11 :57 /lr
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 14:591 sf
0.5 E200.7 07/18/1214:591 sf
50 A4500-S04 E 07/20/12 11 :56 1 ab
10 A2540 C 07/13/12 15:51 1 ab
5.0 E200.8 07/25/1207:521 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/12 15:451 cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/1207:521 cp
25 E200.8 07/25/12 07:521 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1207:521 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1207:521 cp
30 E200.7 07/18/12 14:591 sf
1.0 E200.8 07/25/1207:521 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1207:521 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1215:45/cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 07:521 cp
20 E200.8 07/25/1207:521 cp
5.0 E200.8 07/25/1207:521 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1207:521 cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/1207:521 cp
0.30 E200.8 07/25/1207:521 cp
15 E200.8 07/25/1207:521 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 07:521 cp
E900.1 08/08/1222:25/1bb
E900.1 08/08/1222:25/1bb
E900.1 08/08/12 22:251 Ibb
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
o -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 8 of 54
EI'.ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
Analytical Ex~fIfIC. Sines 1m Helena, MT 877~472~0111 • Billings, MT 800~735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~jll~~e, wy .8~& .. 686w711~ • Rapid Cfty, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX. 888~690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/11/1212:35
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab ID:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070448-004
Client Sample ID: MW-14_07112012
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
1.23
51.4
52.7
3300
1.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
99.0
96.0
85.0
104
MCL!
Units Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date / By
% A1030 E 08/08/1216:021 sdw
meq/L A1030 E 08108/12 16 :02 1 sdw
meq/L A1030 E 08/08/1216:021 sdw
mg/L A1030 E 08/08/12 16 :02 1 sdw
A1030 E 08/08/12 16:021 sdw
ug/L 20 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:521 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:52 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/12 00 :52 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:521 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:52 1 jk
ug/L 20 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:52/ jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:521 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:52 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/1200:521 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:521 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:521 jk
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 07/24/1200:521 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:521 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/24/12 00:521 jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 54
EI'.ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExCBHBflCe Sincs '952
Helena, MT 877 .. 472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
:Gille.ria, WY8&6:"686~1115 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070741-006
Client Sample 10: MW-15_07172012
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Iron
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
120
Units
ug/l
ug/l
Qualifier Rl
30
5.0
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/17/12 10:50
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date / By
E200.7 07/23/12 14:561 sf
E200.8 08/05/12 10:131 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 8 of 27
,EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsJIBflCfI SiRes 1!152
Helena, MT 871 .. 472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 11 Casper, WV 888-235-0515
_ ~ille.#.~, WY8&6"~B6"7115 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070741-007
Client Sample ID: MW-18_07182012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Thallium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
1900
3220
3.73
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/l
ug/l
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/18/12 13:15
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
D 8 E300.0 07/25/1223:121 wc
10 A2540 C 07/23/1209:201 ab
0.50 E200.8 08/05/12 10:181 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 27
EN:RGY 1)151" _~nergy\ab.com ~ 'Heiena, MY 811-472-0711 • Billings, MY 881-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-Us.B515 ~ AnalyticaIExcsUBllCiSi1/Clll!152 J...l .. ,;..:.~.:..;~;~ille.~~, WY8'6:-686~7115 • Rapid City, SI) 888-672-1225 • College Station, 1)( 888-690-2218 LABORATORIES
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070741 -008
Client Sample ID: MW -19_07192012
Analyses Result Units
MAJOR IONS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 4.0
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
o -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
mg/l
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/19/12 08:00
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date / By
o 0.2 E353.2 07/25/1214:34/Ir
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 10 of 27
EI\ERGY
L ABORATORIES
Client:
Project:
LablD:
www.energylab.comHelena.MY877-472-0711 .Billings.MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WV 888-235-0515 Analylic;afEx~l1fICeSincg'852 ,:"~"",;~,,';~~~~,,~IJI~ffe, WY8&&-6B6-717~ • Rapi~ City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C12070741-010
Client Sample ID: MW-23_07172012
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/17/1207:32
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
117 ug/l
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
1.0 E200.8 08/10/12 09:21 1 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 12 of 27
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
AnalyticallxcBHBflCB $incs 1952
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings. MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
·~illefte, W'f8&&-~B6 .. 7175 • Rapid Cfty, SI} 88B-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C12070741-011
Client Sample ID: MW-24_07182012
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Cadmium
Thallium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
4.70
1.36
Units
ug/l
ug/l
Qualifier RL
0.50
0.50
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/18/1206:30
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
E200.8 08/05/12 10:50 1 cp
E200.8 08/07/1204:43 1 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 13 of 27
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-003A
Client Sample ID: MW-25_07102012
Collection Date: 7/10/2012 1220h
Received Date: 7/1212012 1345h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7113/20121230h
Units: Jlg/L Dilution Factor:
Contact: JoAnn Tischler
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Compound Number Limit Result Qual
Tetrahydrofuran
Surrogate
SUIT: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
CAS Result
2037-26-5 50.6
1868-53-7 55.2
460-00-4 53.6
17060-07-0 55.8
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
50.00 101 77-129
50.00 110 80-124
50.00 107 80-128
50.00 112 72-151
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 16 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
l 463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-003
Client Sample ID: MW-25_07102012
Collection Date: 7110/2012 1220h
Received Date: 7/12/2012 1345h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Tin mglL 7/2112012 1743h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
/I. _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
This sample was not digested pursuant to the client request.
/I.
Report Date: 8/28/2012 Page 7 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use ofthe addressee. Privileges of
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
WWN.energylab.com
Analytic;1I Ex~UBflCI Sine{llm
Helena,. MT 877-412-071 1 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
_~ill~~e;, WY 866~6B6-7115 -Rapid Cfty, S[) 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888 .. 690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C12070448-005
Client Sample 10: MW-25_071 02012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
396
321
33
0.30
117
0.43
ND
9.3
290
1620
2780
ND
ND
1.24
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1600
ND
11
ND
ND
ND
0.93
6.45
ND
ND
0.7
0.2
0.2
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCilL
pCilL
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/10/12 12:20
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
D
A2320 B 07/13/12 18:36/ jba
A2320 B 07/13/12 18:361 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:031 sf
1 A4500-CI B 07/19/12 14:551 wc
0.10 A4500-F C 07/13/1214:131 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:031 sf
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 07/17/12 12:521 Ir
0.1 E353.2 07/16/12 12:001 Ir
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:031 sf
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:031 sf
50 A4500-S04 E 07/20/12 12:241 ab
10 A2540 C 07/13/12 15:521 ab
5.0 E200.8 07/25/1207:561 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1215:49/cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/1207:561 cp
25 E200.8 07/25/1207:561 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 07:56 1 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 07:561 cp
30 E200.7 07/18/12 15:031 sf
1.0 E200.8 07/25/12 07:56 1 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1207:561 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1215:491 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 07:561 cp
20 E200.8 07/25/1207:561 cp
5.0 E200.8 07/25/12 07:561 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 07:561 cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/1207:561 cp
0.30 E200.8 07/25/1207:561 cp
15 E200.8 07/25/1207:561 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 07:561 cp
E900.1 08/08/12 22:251 Ibb
E900.1 08/08/12 22:251 Ibb
E900.1 08/08/12 22:251 Ibb
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 10 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
m~1" www.,nergyla~com 1"': '!;';-Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 · Casper, WY 888-235-0515
. .., ~ Analytical ExcsllBflCB$lnc, 1952 ~. " 9i11e.~l!, Wy 8~6-$B6-7115 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/10/12 12:20
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
LablD:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070448-005
Client Sample ID: MW-25_07102012
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
-3.29
41.1
38.5
2600
1.07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
96.0
92.0
80.0
101
MCL!
Units Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
0/0 A1030 E 08/08/12 16 :03 1 sdw
meq/L A1030 E 08108/12 16:031 sdw
meq/L A1030 E 08108/12 16:031 sdw
mg/L A1030 E 08/08/12 16:031 sdw
A1030 E 08/08/12 16:031 sdw
ug/L 20 SW8260B 07/20/1206:51 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/1206:51 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/1206:51 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/12 06:51 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/12 06:51 1 jk
ug/L 20 SW8260B 07/20/1206:51 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/1206:51 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/12 06:51 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/1206:51 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/12 06:51 1 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/20/1206:51 1 jk
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 07/20/1206:51 1 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/20/1206:51 1 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/20/1206:51 1 jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 11 of 54
American West JI.NALYTICAl LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80l) 263-8687
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-004A
Client Sample ID: MW-26_07112012
Collection Date: 7/11 /2012 951h
Received Date: 7/1212012 1345h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/13/20l21249h
Units: J.lg/L
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Dilution Factor:
Contact: JoAnn Tischler
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
SUIT: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
2037-26-5
1868-53-7
460-00-4
17060-07-0
49.6
55.5
53.2
55.2
50.00 99.2 77-129
50.00 111 80-124
50.00 106 80-128
50.00 110 72-151
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 17 of 41
All "n"lv."s "ooli,,"hlp. tn th" r.W A sow A "nn Rr.R A on, op.rfnnnen in "r.r.nrn"nr.p. tn NET ,Af: nrotncol~_ Pertinent samnlinl! infonnation is located on the attached COc. This reooct is orovided for the exclusive use of the addressee, Privileges of
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-rnail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
-Il
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-004
Client Sample ID: MW-26_07112012
Collection Date: 7/1112012 0951h
Received Date: 7/12/2012 1345h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Tin mg/L
Date
Analyzed
712112012 1748b
Contact: JoAnn Tischler
DISSOLVED METALS
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E200.8 0.100 < 0.100 1\
1\ _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
This sample was not digested pursuant to the client request.
Report Date: 8/2812012 Page 8 of 41
1.11 onol"opo onnlieohlp tn th,. rw A s.nw A ""n RrR A "r" n"rfnrmen in "~"nrnance to NELAC orotocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use ofthe addressee. Privileges of
EI'£RGY
LABORAT ORIES
www.energylab.com
A~IytiQ11 ExcsllBilCS Sincs 1951
:Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
-=. ~; _, .9i11e.JfEl:i wY ,866-&86~1115 • Rapid City, S(} 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12070448-006
Client Sample ID: MW-26_07112012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
382
493
78
0.29
152
0.22
1.9
9.5
189
1730
3060
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
773
ND
1100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
28.4
ND
ND
1.8
0.3
0.2
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/11/1209:51
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
A2320 B 07/13/12 18:441 jba
A2320 B 07/13/12 18:441 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/19/12 17:361 sf
A4500-CI B 07/19/12 15:021 wc
0.10 A4500-F C 07/1 3/12 14:161 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:07 1 sf
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 07/17/12 12:541 Ir
0.1 E353.2 07/16/12 12:021 Ir
0.5 E200.7 07/18/1215:071 sf
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:07 1 sf
50 A4500-S04 E 07/20/1212:261 ab
10 A2540 C 07/13/12 15:521 ab
5.0 E200.8 07/25/1208:01 1 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1215:54/cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/12 08:01 1 cp
25 E200.8 07/25/1208:01 1 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 08:01 1 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 08:01 1 cp
30 E200.7 07/18/12 15:07 1 sf
1.0 E200.8 07/25/1208:01 1 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 08:01 1 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1215:541 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1208:01 1 cp
20 E200.8 07/25/1208:01 1 cp
5.0 E200.8 08/01/12 15:541 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1 208:01 1 cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/1 2 08:01 1 cp
0.30 E200.8 07/25/12 08:01 1 cp
15 E200.8 07/25/12 08:01 1 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 08:01 1 cp
E900.1 08/08/1 2 22 :25 1 Ibb
E900.1 08/08/12 22 :25 1 Ibb
E900.1 08/08/1222:25/1bb
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 12 of 54
-b
EN:RGY
LABORAT ORIES
WWN.energyi ab.com
Analytical Excel/BIles Shlcs 1952
Hel",nar MT 877-472-0111 • Billings, MT 800 .. 735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~'Ule~a, wY 8~&,;GB6~7175 • Rapip City, SO 888-612-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/11/12 09 :51
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070448-006
Client Sample 10: MW-26_07112012
Analyses
OAT A QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
1.04
44.7
45.6
2900
1.07
MCL!
Units Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
% A1030 E 08/08/12 16:031 sdw
meq/l A1030 E 08108/12 16:031 sdw
meq/l A1030 E 08108/12 16:031 sdw
mg/l A1030 E 08/08/12 16:031 sdw
A1030 E 08/08/12 16:031 sdw
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 13 of 54
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical Excsllsm:, smc, 1952
Heferta,M(8n~472.;0111 .. Billings,MT 800-735-4489 · Casper, W'{ 888-235-0515
,"_Q!JIe,je~'WY;8'"6"QB6':711~" Rapid City, Sf} 888-672-1225 .. College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C12080830-001
Client Sample 10: MW-26_08162012
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
NO
NO
970
NO
NO
4.9
NO
NO
NO
90.0
90.0
85.0
98.0
o -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Report Date: 08/30/12
Collection Date: 08/16/12 06:40
DateReceived: 08/17/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
20 SW8260B 08/22/1220:51 1 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/1220:51 1 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/12 20:51 1 jk
0 25 SW8260B 08/29/12 05:31 1 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/12 20:51 1 jk
20 SW8260B 08/22/1220:51 1 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/1220:51 1 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/1220:51 1 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/12 20:51 1 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/12 20:51 1 jk
80-120 SW8260B 08/22/12 20:51 1 jk
70-130 SW8260B 08/22/1220:51 1 jk
80-120 SW8260B 08/22/1220:51 1 jk
80-120 SW8260B 08/22/1220:51 1 jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 3 of 12
E~RGY
LABORATORIES
WWN.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsllBI/CB SiRes '952
Helena, MT 8.77-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
. '.~flle!t¢, Wy ~&6 .. GB6-7175 • Rapid City, SD 88B-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab ID:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C12070741-012
Client Sample ID: MW-27 _07162012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
47
6.7
453
1150
1.2
0.3
0.2
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
pC ilL
pCi/L
pC ilL
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/16/12 11 :15
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
D
D
1
0.5
4
10
E300.0
E353.2
E300.0
A2540 C
E900.1
E900.1
E900.1
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
07/25/1223:291 wc
07/25/1214:42 fir
07/25/1223:291 wc
07/23/12 09:201 ab
08/01/1209:30/1bb
08/01/1209:30/1bb
08/01/1209:30/Ibb
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 14 of 27
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExcaIIBflCI Sines 1952
~elena, MT 877·412-071 t • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
.~ille.tte,WY8~6-GB6-7n5 • Rapid City, S[) 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
Client Sample 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C12070741-013
MW-28_07162012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
105 mg/l
o -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/16/12 10:35
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
o 4 E300.0 07/27/1214:01/wc
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 15 of 27
EN:RGY
LABORAT O RIES
WViW.energylab.com
AnaIytitaIEmnsnc, Sh1C. 1952
. el~{\.a; Mt~811'~412~fi71 j • Billings, Ml 800* 135-4489 • Ca$per, WV 888~235-0515 '1~'~·i'~.;iHt· ~ap.ip.~ttY,:~9,88.:-6t2-J2i5 . Colleg~Stat!o:n, TX888 .. 6~O:,~2·18
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C12080143-001
Client Sample 10: MW-28_08012012
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
1660 ug/l
Qualifier Rl
10
Report Date: 08/24/12
Collection Date: 08/01/1214:00
DateReceived: 08/03/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.8 08/20/1215:181 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Paae 3 of 26
r-AlI~"' ~~~-~"'_www~_.e_ner_gy_,a_b._co_m ___ ...::::i=};=~'=! =~::.;..~'. --",,~---:.:.~.H~ele~Qa_,._MT_8_7_7-_4_72_-0_7_1t_, .~' _Bi_lli_ng_s._M.:.-T 8_0_0_-7_35_-_44_8_9 =--e_c_as_pe_r,-=-.wv_' _88_8_"'2::...::3-=-5--=O=-51~5 ~ ~ _ _ = AtJaIytit:aI Ex~/hmcll SIne, 7152 ~ '~iII~tte, WY8~6-&86~117~ • Rapid City, SD 888-612-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
I LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/10/12 13:45
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
;\ient:
ProieCit:
LablP:
-CUel'\\Sampie 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C12070448-001
MW-29_071 02012
~~------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCL!
Aiyses Result Units Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date / By
..I
fTAU -DISSOL VEO
on 1270 ug/l 30 E200.7 07/16/12 15:251 sf
.. .....---------------------------------------------------------------------------._-------------------------------_._-----------------------------_._-_._-----------.------._--------------_ .. _-
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
wWw,energylab.~om
AnaljticalExtJIIIsni:l Silics 1952.
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C 12080 143-002
Client Sample 10: MW-29_08012012
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
4420
5190
Units
mg/l
ug/l
Qualifier RL
10
10
Report Date: 08/24/12
Collection Date: 08/01 /1 2 1 3: 1 0
DateReceived: 08/03/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date I By
A2540 C 08/06/12 13 :30 1 jz
E200.8 08/20/12 15 :23 1 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 26
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
-iJ
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-005A
Client Sample ID: MW-30_07102012
Collection Date: 711012012 1100h
Received Date: 711212012 1345h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/13/20121308h
Units: J-lg/L
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Dilution Factor: 1
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
2037-26-5
1868-53-7
460-00-4
17060-07-0
50.4
55.0
56.4
55.8
50.00 101 77-129
50.00 110 80-124
50.00 113 80-128
50.00 112 72-151
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 18 of 41
Ii 11 ,n,l"opo 'nnl;~,hlp tn thp rw Ii <:nUIIi on,j RrR Ii orp nprtM"-''',j ;n .~~nr,j.n~p tn NFl _Ar nTOtnro"1.< Pp.rtinp.nt s"",nlin17 information is lor,ated on the attached COc. This reoort is orovided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-005
Client Sample ID: MW-30_07102012
Collection Date: 7/10/2012 1100h
Received Date: 7112/2012 1345h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Tin mg/L
Date
Analyzed
712112012 1753h
Contact: JoAnn Tischler
DISSOLVED METALS
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E200.8 0.100 < 0.100 1\
1\ _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
This sample was not digested pursuant to the client request.
Report Date: 8/28/2012 Page 9 of 41
-1<
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
(111" www ...... gylab.com F~··Ii.le~ MT 87H12-0711 • 8illlng~ 1M 800-735-4489 • CaspeF. WY 888-235-0515 ~ti:.J AnaIyti~'Ex~1If/C1 Sines 1$52 J.~ .. ~~:";,:= .;MI~jte, wY866 .. $86~7n~ • Rapip C[ty, SI) 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12070448-007
Client Sample ID: MW-30_071 02012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
182
246
128
0.33
65.9
ND
17
6.2
96.9
733
1570
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
43
ND
31
ND
ND
ND
38.5
ND
ND
7.64
ND
ND
0.3
0.1
0.2
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
'ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/10/12 11 :00
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
D
A2320 B 07/13/12 18:521 jba
1 A2320 B 07/13/1218:52/jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:181 sf
A4500-CI B 07/19/12 15:031 wc
0.1 0 A4500-F C 07/13/1214:21 1 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/1215:18/sf
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 07/17/12 13:201 Ir
E353.2 07/16/12 12:051 Ir
0.5 E200.7 07/18/1215:181 sf
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:181 sf
20 A4500-S04 E 07/20/12 12:31 1 ab
10 A2540 C 07/13/12 15:521 ab
5.0 E200.8 07/25/1208:061 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1215:58/cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/12 08:06 1 cp
25 E200.8 07/25/12 08:061 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 08:061 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 08:061 cp
30 E200.7 07/18/1215:181 sf
1.0 E200.8 07/25/12 08:061 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 08:061 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1215:58/cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 08:061 cp
20 E200.8 07/25/12 08:061 cp
5.0 E200.8 07/25/12 08:061 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 08:061 cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/12 08:061 cp
0.30 E200.8 07/25/12 08:061 cp
15 E200.8 07/25/12 08:061 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 08:061 cp
E900.1 08/08/12 22:25 1 Ibb
E900.1 08/08/12 22:25 1 Ibb
E900.1 08/08/12 22:25 llbb
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 14 of 54
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical Exf;l1l1l1f1CfI SiRes 1m
oil
Helena, MT 871-472 .. 071 t • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888 .. 235-0515
, ~iII~~El:, Wt~66.;$B6-'7n5 • Rapid Cfty, S() 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/1 0/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/10/12 11 :00
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab ID:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070448-007
Client Sample ID: MW-30_071 02012
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
-2.25
23.1
22.1
1500
1.08
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
100
90.0
85.0
92.0
MCL!
Units Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date / By
0/0 A1030 E 08/08/12 16:03/ sdw
meq/l A1030 E 08108/12 16 :03 1 sdw
meq/l A1030 E 08108/12 16:031 sdw
mg/L A1030 E 08/08/12 16:031 sdw
A1030 E 08/08/12 16:031 sdw
ug/L 20 SW8260B 07/20/12 07:281 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/12 07:281 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/12 07:281 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/12 07:281 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/12 07:281 jk
ug/L 20 SW8260B 07/20/12 07:28 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/1207:281 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/12 07 :28 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/12 07:28 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/20/1207:281 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/20/12 07:281 jk
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 07/20/12 07:281 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/20/12 07:281 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/20/12 07:281 jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 15 of 54
I
I
-iJ
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines Contact: JoAnn Tischler
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-006A
Client Sample ID: MW-31_07092012
ANALYTICA L LAB ORATOR I ES Collection Date: 7/9/2012 1335h
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 7/12/2012 1345h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/13/20121327h
Units: J.lg/L
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Dilution Factor: 1
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
SUIT: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
2037-26-5
1868-53-7
460-00-4
17060-07-0
50.2
53.6
53.8
55.0
50.00 100 77-129
50.00 107 80-124
50.00 108 80-128
50.00 110 72-151
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 19 of 41
.\ 11 _ •• _f •• ____ ._ •• 1: __ 1..1.. "--... 1.._ r"nr A ('nUT /I. ....... ..1 Dr"D " ...... ,.... """'.4" ............... .oA ; ........ "' .... ~ ... A."n,... ... t,....l\w r &r nrAt",..."l" Pprhnpnt ctlmnlina infnrtl1;lt;rm ;~ lnr:~tp.n on thf': MtHcheci r.Or:. This renort lS nfovided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privile es of
(
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-006
Client Sample ID: MW-31_07092012
Collection Date: 7/9/2012 1335h
Received Date: 7/12/2012 1345h
Contact: JoAnn Tischler
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Tin mg/L 712112012 1757h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
1\ _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
This sample was not digested pursuant to the client request.
1\
Report Date: 8/28/2012 Page 10 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinentsau:pling infonnation is located on th~ att~ched C<?c. This report is provided for the e~cl.usive us~.ofthe addr~ssee. Privileges of
Ef\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analyti(;llf Ex~II(lflC1 Sincfll952
,Helefl3" MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
",,,*~~~~ur~~e,wY866:'GB6~H75 • Rapid Cfty, SD888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C 12070448-008
Client Sample 10: MW-31_07092012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL .. Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
202
189
161
0.78
90.1
NO
21
6.0
98.0
529
1400
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
74.0
NO
NO
8.17
NO
NO
0.3
0.1
0.2
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC .. Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/09/12 13:35
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCl!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
0
0
A2320 B 07/13/12 19:21 / jba
1 A2320 B 07/13/12 19:21 1 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:221 sf
A4500-CI B 07/19/12 15:061 wc
0.10 A4500-F C 07/13/12 14:241 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:221 sf
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 07/17/12 13:08 fir
E353.2 07/16/12 12:07 1 Ir
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:221 sf
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:221 sf
10 A4500-S04 E 07/20/12 13:021 ab
10 A2540 C 07/13/12 15:521 ab
5.0 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1216:03/cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
25 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
30 E200.7 07/18/1215:22/sf
1.0 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1216:03/cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
20 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
5.0 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
0.30 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
15 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1208:101 cp
E900.1 08/08/1222:25/1bb
E900.1 08/08/12 22:251 Ibb
E900.1 08/08/12 22 :25 1 Ibb
MCL .. Maximum contaminant level.
NO .. Not detected at the reporting limit.
o .. RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 16 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
AnalYtical !xt;Bl!ffWi Sines '952
ijeiena, MT&77~472 .. 0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888 .. 235-0515
<,-~_gJUe,~~'t ~t8.;8 .. $86 .. H7~ • Rapid CIty, S[) 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888~690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C 12070448-008
Client Sample 10: MW-31_07092012
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
2.10
20.4
21 .3
1300
1.09
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
94.0
90.0
78.0
94.0
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/09/12 13:35
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date / By
A1030 E 08/08/12 16:031 sdw
A1030 E 08108/12 16:031 sdw
A1030 E 08108/12 16:03 1 sdw
A1030 E 08/08/12 16:031 sdw
A1030 E 08/08/12 16:031 sdw
20 SW8260B 07/18/12 15:341 jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/18/12 15:341 jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/18/1215:34/jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/18/12 15:341 jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/18/1215:341 jk
20 SW8260B 07/18/12 15:341 jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/18/12 15:341 jk
1.0 -SW8260B 07/18/12 15:341 jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/18/12 15:341 jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/18/12 15:341 jk
80-120 SW8260B 07/18/12 15:341 jk
70-130 SW8260B 07/18/12 15:341 jk
S 80-120 SW8260B 07/18/12 15:341 jk
80-120 SW8260B 07/18/12 15:34/ jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 17 of 54
EI\.ERGY
LABORATORIES
WWN.energylab.com
AnatytH:aIEtt;BJ/mn;B SineIJ 1952
.. ; ......... Hel!lna, .MT 8n-472~0711 • Billings. MT 800-735-4489 -Casper, WV 888~235-0515
.. ~nlqge, '!l'f 8~8 .. 6B~w7n5 -Rapid C~ty, SD 888-672-1225 -College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/09/12 13:15
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
LablD:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070448-002
Client Sample ID: MW-32_07092012
Analyses
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
1.4
0.2
0.2
Units
pC ill
pCi/l
pC ill
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date / By
E900.1 08/08/1222:25/1bb
E900.1 08/08/12 22:251 Ibb
E900.1 08/08/1222:25/1bb
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 5 of 54
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-007A
American West Client Sample ID: MW-35_07102012
ANALYTICAL LABO.RATORIES Collection Date: 7/10/2012 1410h
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Received Date: 711212012 1345h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/13/2012 1346h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Dilution Factor:
Contact: JoAnn Tischler
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
SUIT: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dich1oroethane-d4
2037-26-5
1868-53-7
460-00-4
17060-07-0
50.8 50.00 102 77-129
55.1 50,00 110 80-124
55.3 50.00 111 80-128
55.7 50.00 111 72-151
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 20 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
1 1 f 1 ('Ii r t' t' p' (' •• • t . 1 .... ::. . t .
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-007
Client Sample ID: MW-35_07102012
Collection Date: 7/10/2012 1410h
Received Date: 7/12/2012 1345h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Tin mg/L 712112012 1830h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
A _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
This sample was not digested pursuant to the client request.
A
Report Date: 8128/2012 Page 11 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
.f ; ("' f t' 'h' t f ,';n t', t p r 1 1 t ,
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com l e .... ·•· .. ··.·Hel ••.•• MTIi17-47.2"0711 .Billings.MT 881-735-4489. Casper, WY 888·23$--0515
AnaIyth;aIEtcsUBflC.Sint;s 1m . ~:~=: "-.~Uletfe, 'NY 866~~B6,~7n5 • Rapid City, SI) 888-612-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12070448-009
Client Sample ID: MW-35_071 02012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
400
504
64
0.35
150
0.08
ND
10.3
366
2230
3860
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
131
ND
272
ND
ND
ND
15.9
ND
0.57
24.5
ND
ND
3.5
0.3
0.2
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/10/1214:10
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
D
D
A2320 B 07/13/12 19:37 1 jba
1 A2320 B 07/13/12 19:37 1 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:27 1 sf
A4500-CI B 07/19/12 15:081 wc
0.10 A4500-F C 07/13/1214:261 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:27 1 sf
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 07/17/1213:101lr
0.1 E353.2 07/16/1212:10/lr
0.5 E200.7 07/18/1215:271 sf
1 E200.7 07/18/12 15:27 1 sf
50 A4500-S04 E 07/20/1213:05/ ab
10 A2540 C 07/13/12 15:521 ab
5.0 E200.8 07/25/12 08:151 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1216:21 1 cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/12 08:151 cp
25 E200.8 07/25/12 08:151 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1208:151 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1208:151 cp
30 E200.7 07/18/1215:271 sf
1.0 E200.8 07/25/1208:151 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1208:151 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1216:21 / cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1208:151 cp
20 E200.8 07/25/1208:15/ cp
5.0 E200.8 07/25/1208:151 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/1208:151 cp
0.50 E200.8 07/25/1208:151 cp
0.30 E200.8 07/25/1208:151 cp
15 E200.8 07/25/1208:151 cp
10 E200.8 07/25/12 08:15/ cp
E900.1 08/09/12 00:07 / Ibb
E900.1 08/09/12 00:07 1 Ibb
E900.1 08/09/12 00:07 / Ibb
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 18 of 54
Ef\ERGY
LABORATORiES
www.energylab.com
AI18Iyth;;aI Ex~f1:fIC(I s;m;, 1152
. Helell~r MT B77~472 .. 0111 • Billings. MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888 ... 235-0515
_~ill~j~,WY 8Q,&~GB6':7n~ • Rapip C[ty, SD 888-612-1225 • College Station, lX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12070448-009
Client Sample ID: MW-35_071 02012
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
-0.973
54.8
53.7
3500
1.09
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
94.0
84.0
75.0
95.0
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/10/12 14:10
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date / By
A1030 E 08/08/12 16:041 sdw
A1030 E 08108/12 16:041 sdw
A1030 E 08108/12 16:041 sdw
A1030 E 08/08/12 16:041 sdw
A1030 E 08/08/12 16:041 sdw
20 SW8260B 07/19/1218:061 jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/19/1218:061 jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/19/1218:06/jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/19/1218:06/jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/19/1218:06/jk
20 SW8260B 07/19/12 18:061 jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/19/12 18:061 jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/19/12 18:061 jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/19/1218:061 jk
1.0 SW8260B 07/19/1218:061 jk
80-120 SW8260B 07/19/1218:061 jk
70-130 SW8260B 07/19/1218:06/jk
S 80-120 SW8260B 07/19/1218:061 jk
80-120 SW8260B 07/19/12 18:061 jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 19 of 54
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-008A
Client Sample ID: MW-36_07112012
Collection Date: 7/1112012 915h
Received Date: 7/1212012 1345h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/13/20121406h
Units: J.lg/L Dilution Factor:
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Compound Number Limit Result Qual
Tetrahydrofuran
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
CAS Result
2037-26-5 50.3
1868-53-7 55.1
460-00-4 54.5
17060-07-0 55.3
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
50.00 101 77-129
50.00 110 80-124
50.00 109 80-128
50.00 111 72-151
tr
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 21 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCO This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
t pr 'f of f 1 -1 (' po' t f 'f t' po n
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-008
Client Sample ID: MW-36_07112012
Collection Date: 711112012 0915h
Received Date: 7112/2012 1345h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Tin mg/L 7/2112012 1835h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
A _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
This sample was not digested pursuant to the client request.
A
Report Date: 8/28/2012 Page 12 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of • . 1".' 1",<' 1 ",,',. rot' l' 1'", " • ___ .. !_ .• ___ ~ •. ,_.1._ .1 ....... : _____ ._ .... ____ .. : ______ l __ ~_. __ . ___ ..l ___ .. ___________ ~_ ...... __ ... _.l.; .... _ ••. ; .. t..+t."'_ .... _ .. \..l; ...... ...: ............. f:+ .... ~ ....................... f: ....... n .... .
·1 EI'£RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
AnalYtical Ex~UIIfWi $inc, 1952
Hel~na,MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 801) .. 735-4489 • Casper, WY 888 .. 235-0515
\'~ilteJf~,,~¥8~G~QB6wln~ • Rapid City, SO 888~672~1225 • College Station, IX 888~690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
LablD: C12070448-010
Client Sample ID: MW-36_07112012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Defin itions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
353
433
60
0.30
134
ND
0.2
8.8
635
2660
4420
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
278
ND
0.98
26.5
ND
ND
0.6
0.2
0.2
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pC ilL
pC ilL
pC ilL
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/11/1209:15
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
D
D
A2320 B 07/13/12 19:531 jba
A2320 B 07/13/1219:531 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/1215:30/sf
A4500-CI B 07/19/1215:11/wc
0.10 A4500-F C 07/13/1214:291 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:301 sf
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 07/17/1213:1211r
0.1 E353.2 07/16/1212:12/1r
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:301 sf
E200.7 07/18/12 15:301 sf
50 A4500-S04 E 07/20/12 13:27 1 ab
10 A2540 C 07/13/1215:53/ab
5.0 E200.8 08/01/1216:43/cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1216:43/cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1216:43/cp
25 E200.8 08/01/12 16:431 cp
10 E200.8 08/01/12 16:431 cp
10 E200.8 08/01/12 16:431 cp
30 E200.7 07/18/12 15:301 sf
1.0 E200.8 08/01/1216:431 cp
10 E200.8 08/01/12 16:431 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/12 16:431 cp
10 E200.8 08/01/12 16:431 cp
20 E200.8 08/01/1216:431 cp
5.0 E200.8 08/01/12 16:431 cp
10 E200.8 08/01/12 16:431 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/12 16:431 cp
0.30 E200.8 08/01/12 16:431 cp
15 E200.8 08/01/12 16:431 cp
10 E200.8 08/01/12 16:431 cp
E900.1 08/09/12 00:07 1 Ibb
E900.1 08/09/12 00:07 1 Ibb
E900.1 08/09/12 00:07 1 Ibb
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 20 of 54
EN:RGY
L ABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical Extsllsnci Sines 1152
.' Helena, MT 877-472-071 t, • Billings. MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
, .~,' "~iir~~~, wy 86.6~686~n75 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/11/1209:15
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070448-0 1 0
Client Sample 10: MW-36_07112012
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
-1.96
62.9
60.5
4100
1.07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
97.0
93.0
83.0
95.0
MCL!
Units Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
0/0 A1030 E 08/08/12 16:04/ sdw
meq/L A1030 E 08/08/12 16:041 sdw
meq/L A1030 E 08/08/12 16:041 sdw
mg/L A1030 E 08/08/12 16 :04 1 sdw
A1030 E 08/08/12 16:041 sdw
ug/L 20 SW8260B 07/24/12 01 :28 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/12 01 :28 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/12 01 :28 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/12 01 :28 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/1201 :28 1 jk
ug/L 20 SW8260B 07/24/12 01 :28 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/1201 :28 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/1201 :28 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/1201 :28 1 jk
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 07/24/12 01 :28 1 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/24/12 01 :28 1 jk
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 07/24/12 01 :28 1 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/24/12 01 :28 1 jk
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 07/24/12 01 :28 1 jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 21 of 54
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: Semi Annual Ground Water
Lab Sample ID: 1208066-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-37 _07302012
Collection Date: 7/30/2012 1340h
Received Date: 8/312012
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 8/6/20128lIh
Units: Jlg/L
1100h
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Compound Number Limit Result Qual
Tetrahydrofuran
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
CAS Result
2037-26-5 50.4
1868-53-7 50.2
460-00-4 52.2
17060-07-0 5l.6
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
50.00 101 77-129
50.00 100 80-124
50.00 104 80-128
50.00 103 72-151
Report Date: 8/14/2012 Page 6 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use oft~e name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication oft?is report for any
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Client: Denison Mines
Project: Semi Annual Ground Water
Lab Sample ID: 1208066-001
Client Sample ID: MW-37_07302012
Collection Date: 7/30/2012 1340h
Received Date:
Analytical Results
Compound
8/3/2012
Units
1100h
Date
Prepared
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 Tin mg/L
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
This sample was not digested pursuant to the client request.
Date
Analyzed
811312012 1530h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method
Used
E200.8
DISSOLVED METALS
Reporting
Limit
0.100
Analytical
Result
< 0.100
Qual
Report Date: 8/1412012 Page 5 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or pro. cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of t!tisreport for any
-"AI'
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
wWw.ooergylab.~om
Aliilytftal ~ Siflcg'1m
·.·.:··~~·';.H~I~'l,a.:'Mr 8':1~41,~ .. pl11 .·aiUingS~fdr800~735~44~9 · Casper, ~'888"235-0515
: ~iU~tt~i1t!&'"liB!:"lfll · .. R~p.id ~JtY,SP.888~'72-1225 . Colleg~ Statio'n, TX .8'8-6~O-i218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C12080143-003
Client Sample 10: MW-37 _07302012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
265
486
51
0.22
133
ND
0.8
15.1
575
2700
4090
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.6
ND
ND
ND
12.4
ND
28
2.9
1.2
1.3
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/24/12
Collection Date: 07/30/12 13:40
Date Received : 08/03/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
D
D
A2320 B 08/06/12 16:55 1 jba
1 A2320 B 08/06/12 16:55 1 jba
0.5 E200.7 08/20/12 13:101 sf
4 E300.0 08/08/12 21 :29 1 wc
0.10 A4500-F C 08/06/12 13:301 jba
0.5 E200.7 08/20/12 13:101 sf
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 08/08/12 12:121 Ir
0.1 E353.2 08/06/12 12:53 fir
0.5 E200.7 08/20/12 13:101 sf
2 E200.7 08/20/12 13: 1 0 1 sf
20 E300.0 08/08/12 21 :29 1 wc
10 A2540 C 08/06/12 13:31 1 jz
5.0 E200.8 08/20/12 15:27 1 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/20/12 15 :27 1 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/20/12 15 :27 1 cp
25 E200.8 08/20/12 15:27 1 cp
10 E200.8 08/20/12 15:27 1 cp
10 E200.8 08/20/12 15 :27 1 cp
30 E200.7 08/20/12 13:101 sf
1.0 E200.8 08/20/12 15:27 1 cp
10 E200.8 08/20/12 15:27 1 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/20/12 15:27 1 cp
10 E200.8 08/20/12 15:27 1 cp
20 E200.8 08/20/12 15 :27 1 cp
5.0 E200.8 08/20/12 15 :27 1 cp
10 E200.8 08/20/12 15:27 1 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/20/12 15 :27 1 cp
100 E200.8 08/20/12 15 :27 1 cp
0.30 E200.8 08/20/12 15:27 1 cp
15 E200.8 08/20/12 15:27 1 cp
10 E200.8 08/20/12 15:27 1 cp
E900.1 08/08/12 06 :49 1 Ibb
E900.1 08/08/12 06:491 Ibb
E900.1 08/08/12 06 :49 1 Ibb
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 5 of 26
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
wWw.energylab.com
Analjlitll EmO. Sblcil 1m
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C 12080 143-003
Client Sample 10: MW-37 _07302012
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: T oluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
-1.17
62.0
60.6
4100
1.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
104
102
118
115
Units
0/0
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifier Rl
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 08/24/12
Collection Date: 07/30/12 13:40
DateReceived: 08/03/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date / By
A1030 E 08/23/1207:341 kbh
A1030 E 08123/12 07:341 kbh
A1030 E 08123/12 07:341 kbh
A1030 E 08/23/12 07:341 kbh
A1030 E 08/23/12 07:341 kbh
SW8260B 08/08/12 01 :46 1 jk
SW8260B 08/08/1201 :46 1 jk
SW8260B 08/08/12 01 :46 1 jk
SW8260B 08/08/12 01 :46 1 jk
SW8260B 08/08/12 01 :46 1 jk
SW8260B 08/08/12 01 :46 1 jk
SW8260B 08/08/12 01 :46 1 jk
SW8260B 08/08/12 01 :46 1 jk
SW8260B 08/08/12 01 :46 1 jk
SW8260B 08/08/12 01 :46 1 jk
SW8260B 08/08/12 01 :46 1 jk
SW8260B 08/08/12 01 :46 1 jk
SW8260B 08/08/12 01 :46 1 jk
SW8260B 08/08/12 01 :46 1 jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 26
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-009A
Client Sample ID: MW-65_07112012
Collection Date: 7/11/2012 951h
Received Date: 7/12/2012 1345h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7113/20121425h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
SUIT: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
2037-26-5
1868-53-7
460-00-4
17060-07-0
50.6
56.7
53.3
56.0
50.00 101 77-129
50.00 113 80-124
50.00 107 80-128
50.00 112 72-151
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 22 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
,f t p f 't ~t' f; po (' po; • (' . t " t .. th' n
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1207185-009
Client Sample ID: MW-65_07112012
Collection Date: 7111/2012 0951h
Received Date: 7112/2012 1345h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Tin mg/L 712112012 1839h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
/\ -Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
This sample was not digested pursuant to the client request.
/\
Report Date: 8128/2012 Page 13 of41
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
(mhcpnl1pnt l1~P n.fthP ,.'HU"nP nf'tl,1<:' ('>{'\rnn;;lt", nr '.l"" mprrtlv.r I'\f;t" d?lff or rpnrt"'l(ln,..tTnn nfthl<:' rpnnrt 1n ('(\nnpr.t;nn with thp ~nvf"rti~f"mpnt nromntinn or s::Ile: of ::Inv nrnnnr.t or nrnr.p.ss or in ~nnnectl()n with the re-nllhlication o· fi V
www.energylab.com ( ..,""' ....... ' . 'Helella" MT 877 .. 472-0711 • BiUings,MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
JltiJ"hL ,:"§ur~~~, WYU6~$86, .. 7115 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES Analytical ExCSUBflCB SiIlCI 1852
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
LablD: C12070448-011
Client Sample ID: MW-65_07112012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
390
463
74
0.29
161
0.22
2.1
10.4
201
1730
3130
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
793
ND
1200
ND
ND
ND
5.1
ND
ND
30.2
ND
ND
2.0
0.3
0.2
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pC ilL
pC ilL
pC ilL
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/11/1209:51
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
A2320 B 07/13/12 20:01 1 jba
1 A2320 B 07/13/1220:01 1 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:421 sf
A4500-CI B 07/19/1215:12/wc
0.10 A4500-F C 07/13/1214:321 jba
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:421 sf
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 07/17/12 13:14 fir
0.1 E353.2 07/16/12 12:151 Ir
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:421 sf
0.5 E200.7 07/18/12 15:421 sf
50 A4500-S04 E 07/20/1213:291 ab
10 A2540 C 07/13/12 15:531 ab
5.0 E200.8 08/01/12 16:471 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
25 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
10 E200.8 08/01/12 16:471 cp
10 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
30 E200.7 07/18/12 15:421 sf
1.0 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
10 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
10 E200.8 08/01/12 16:471 cp
20 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
5.0 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
10 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
0.50 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
0.30 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
15 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
10 E200.8 08/01/1216:471 cp
E900.1 08/09/12 00:07 1 Ibb
E900.1 08/09/12 00:07 1 Ibb
E900.1 08/09/12 00:07 1 Ibb
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 22 of 54
EI\ERGY
LAEIORATORI ES
www.energyJab.com
Analytical ExtBlllHI&' Sines '852
Hil¢na, MTSn .. 472:..0111 • BUlings.MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, Wf 888 ... 235-0515
j!ill~~g;Wt8~6' .. $8~~1l1~ • Rapid Ctty, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/11/1209:51
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C12070448-011
Client Sample 10: MW-65_07112012
Analyses
OAT A QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
0.791
44.6
45.3
2800
1.10
MCL!
Units Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date / By
% A1030 E 08/08/12 16:04/ sdw
meq/l A1030 E 08/08/12 16:04/ sdw
meq/l A1030 E 08108/12 16:041 sdw
mg/l A1030 E 08/08/12 16:041 sdw
A1030 E 08/08/12 16:041 sdw
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 23 of 54
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
~~~ www.energylab.com
~ Analytit:al ExCSUJflCB $Ince '652
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
«§~II~tt~~.~Y 8&&-686-7175 II Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C 12080830-002
Client Sample 10: MW-65_08162012
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
NO
NO
960
NO
NO
5.2
NO
NO
NO
88.0
92.0
86.0
96.0
o -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Report Date: 08/30/12
Collection Date: 08/16/1206:40
DateReceived: 08/17/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date / By
20 SW8260B 08/22/12 20: 141 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/1220:141 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/1220:141 jk
0 25 SW8260B 08/29/12 06:081 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/1220:141 jk
20 SW8260B 08/22/1220:141 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/12 20:141 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/1220:141 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/1220:141 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/22/1220:141 jk
80-120 SW8260B 08/22/1220:1 41 jk
70-130 SW8260B 08/22/1220:141 jk
80-120 SW8260B 08/22/1220:141 jk
80-120 SW8260B 08/22/1220:141 jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 12
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsJIBflCI Sines 1952
Helena, MT 877 .. 472-0111 • Billings, MT 800 .. 735-4489 • Casper, WY 888 .. 235-0515
~iUe.~¢, WY 86&·686~ 7115 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
Client Sample 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070741-009
MW-70_07182012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Fluoride
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
1.02
48.6
Units
mg/l
ug/l
Qualifier Rl
0.10
5.0
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/18/1209:55
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date / By
A4500-F C 07/23/12 12:341 jba
E200.8 08/05/12 10:41 1 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND - Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 11 of 27
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
1207185-010A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 7/9/2012
Received Date: 7112/2012 1345h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7113/20121444h
Units: Jlg/L Dilution Factor:
Contact: JoAnn Tischler
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Compound Number Limit Result Qual
Tetrahydrofuran
Surrogate
SUIT: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
CAS
2037-26-5
1868-53-7
460-00-4
17060-07-0
Result
51.3
55.4
55.4
56.1
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
50.00 103 77-129
50.00 111 80-124
50.00 111 80-128
50.00 112 72-151
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 23 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infommtion is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use ofthe addressee. Privileges of
• 4 ~ • • ..,.., • _________ ! ___ . ___ ..... : ... _ ~_.; ... t. .l.. ........... -. .. hl~~ .. ..,; ......... "f'tJ..;", ... A ..... "rt .fnT' 'JOn,
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
Semi Annual Ground Water
1208066-002A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 7/30/2012
Received Date: 8/3/2012 1100h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 8/6/2012 849h
Units: Jlg/L Dilution Factor:
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surrogate
SUIT: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
CAS
2037-26-5
1868-53-7
460-00-4
17060-07-0
Result
51.1
50.5
52.9
51.9
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
CAS
Number
109-99-9
Method:
Reporting
Limit
1.00
Amount Spiked %REC
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
102
101
106
104
SW8260C
Analytical
Result
< 1.00
Limits
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Qual
Qual
Report Date: 8/14/2012 Page 7 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SOW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is lQcated on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
<l1h'POll",nt 11.'" ofth" nam" ofthis comnanv or anv member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication oft.his report for any
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
WWIY.energyJ ab.com
AnalYtical ExtBlIsncs SinCi '952
Hel~na, MT 877-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
9jU~tte, WY8~6"G8~~111~ • Rapiej City, SI} 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C 12070448-0 12
Client Sample 10: Trip Blank 6706
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-dB
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
95.0
B9.0
7B.0
95.0
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/09/12
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
20 SWB260B 07/19/1216:16/jk
1.0 SWB260B 07/19/12 16:161 jk
1.0 SWB260B 07/19/12 16:161 jk
1.0 SWB260B 07/19/12 16:161 jk
1.0 SWB260B 07/19/1216:161 jk
20 SWB260B 07/19/12 16:161 jk
1.0 SWB260B 07/19/12 16:161 jk
1.0 SWB260B 07/19/1216:16/jk
1.0 SWB260B 07/19/12 16:161 jk
1.0 SWB260B 07/19/1216:16/jk
BO-120 SWB260B 07/19/1216:16/jk
70-130 SWB260B 07/19/1216:16/jk
S BO-120 SWB260B 07/19/1216:16/jk
BO-120 SWB260B 07/19/1216:16/jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 24 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
wWw.energylab.com
MstytitJ;1 Exci1/JBf1C8 SiilC, '952
':ffbi~~,~f'@ '~1;1~41~~0711 .BillingstMl800 .. 135~4489 • Caspe,r,WY888 .. 235';0515
''.l',6lJ8@~:lf1,5 ·~apig,~JtYl '~ll'888~'72~~ 225 -Collegtt Sf~tlDn, IX 888-6.0-~218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
LablD: C12080143-004
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: T oluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
105
109
119
115
Units
ug/l
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifier Rl
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 08/24/12
Collection Date: 07/30/12
DateReceived: 08/03/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
SW8260B 08/07/1218:46/jk
SW8260B 08/07/1218:46/jk
SW8260B 08/07/12 18:461 jk
SW8260B 08/07/1218:46/jk
SW8260B 08/07/12 18:461 jk
SW8260B 08/07/1218:46/jk
SW8260B 08/07/1218:461 jk
SW8260B 08/07/1218:461 jk
SW8260B 08/07/1218:461 jk
SW8260B 08/07/1218:461 jk
SW8260B 08/07/1218:46/jk
SW8260B 08/07/12 18:461 jk
SW8260B 08/07/1218:461 jk
SW8260B 08/07/1218:461 jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7 of 26
PO .",:;<1 .. www.energylab.com ~-H~lena.MTB77-472~071t .Billings.MT 800 .. 135-4489 · Casper, WY 888-235-0515 -~ AnalyticalExCBIiBflCBSince ',!152 1~!~~ll,.·~n'e.~~J'~y,B§'& .. 6B6-71l5.. Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Statinn, TX 888-690-2218 EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C 12080830-003
Client Sample 10: Trip Blank 6706
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
90.0
93.0
84.0
102
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifier Rl
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 08/30/12
Collection Date: 08/16/12
DateReceived: 08/17/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date I By
SW8260B 08/27/12 16:451 jk
SW8260B 08/27/12 16:451 jk
SW8260B 08/27/12 16:451 jk
SW8260B 08/27/1216:45 /jk
SW8260B 08/27/1216:451 jk
SW8260B 08/27/1216:451 jk
SW8260B 08/27/12 16:451 jk
SW8260B 08/27/12 16:451 jk
SW8260B 08/27/12 16:451 jk
SW8260B 08/27/12 16:451 jk
SW8260B 08/27/12 16:451 jk
SW8260B 08/27/12 16:451 jk
SW8260B 08/27/1216:451 jk
SW8260B 08/27/12 16:451 jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 5 of 12
EI'l:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsllBflC. Sincs 1952
Helena, MT 817-472-0111 • Billings. MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
'~jllette, WY866:-QB6~7n5 • Rapid City, S() 888-672-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C12070741-014
Client Sample ID: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
1.6
Qualifier RL
Report Date: 08/14/12
Collection Date: 07/19/12
DateReceived: 07/20/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
E170.1 07/20/1209:551 kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 16 of 27
E~RGY
LABORATORIES
Client:
Project:
LablD:
M" www.~ab.com ~\ 0 °K,I,na. MT 817-472..jJ711 • Billings, MT 8011-7354489 • Casper. W'/888-235-8515 ~ AnalyticalExCBUBflCtlSincll 1!152 J; ... ~~~~'~".'§UI~tteJ -Ny :a66~686~7n5 • Rapid Ctty, SD 888-612-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
C12070448-013
Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/12/12
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Client Sample ID: Temp Blank Matrix: Aqueous
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
2.0
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCl Method Analysis Date / By
E170.1 07/13/12 10:30/ kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 25 of 54
EN:RGY
L ABORATORIES
witrN:energyJab.com
Anatytit,I 4cillsiu$$ItH;. 1952
n a "··st1~41~~o:1.H .BUJlng~tMr'O~-7~5-44B9 ·Casper,W¥ '88-235~0515 =,.~.".~1:17,l·.~~pi~'¢riv;~p:,iQj:'612.J226 · C~lleg~:St«lt!Dn, 1X 8.8~6QO .. 2218,
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C 12080 143-005
Client Sample 10: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
4.0
Qualifier RL
Report Date: 08/24/12
Collection Date: 08/02/12
DateReceived: 08/03/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
E170.1 08/03/12 09:501 kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 8 of 26
J /
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
JoAnn Tischler
Denison Mines
1050 17th Street, # 950
Denver, CO 80265
TEL: [phone]
RE: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Dear JoAnn Tischler: Lab Set ID: 1207185
American West Analytical Laboratories received 10 sample(s) on 7/12/2012 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Association Conference (NELAC) Institute in Utah and Texas;
and is state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri. In addition,
A W AL is also accredited by the American Analytical Laboratory Association (A2LA) on
ISO IEC 17025:2005, Department of Defense (DOD), UST for the State of Wyoming, and
the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). All analyses were
performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute andlor A2LA protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
This is a revision to a report originally issued 7/23/2012. Pages 1 and 5-13 have been
revised.
Thank You,
Approved by:
Ky I e F. Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
DN: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
" u=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G . email~[e-mail]. c=US r OS S _~[)~te: 2'0T-l~pJ.28 14:34:27 -06'00'
lr
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 8/28/2012 Page 1 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive lise of the addressee. Privileges of
s f 1 t " it ~ r , n t ' . r r r ;n t' t r ._ 1 1
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Denison Mines Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
ANALYTICAL I.ABORATOR IES Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Lab Set ID: 1207185
Date Received: 711212012 1345h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1207185-001A MW-11 07112012 7/1112012 1210h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 8260C/5030C
1207185-001B MW-11 07112012 7/11/2012 1210h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
1207185-002A MW-14 07112012 7/11/2012 1235h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
Phone: [phone] 1207185-002B MW-14 07112012 7/1112012 1235h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
Toll Free: [phone] 1207185-003A MW-25 07102012 7/10/2012 1220h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
Fax: [phone]C/5030C
~-mail: [e-mail] 1207185-003B MW-25 07102012 7/10/2012 1220h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
1207185-004A MW-26 07112012 7/11/2012 951h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
web: www.awal-Iabs.com 1207185-004B MW-26 07112012 7/1112012 951h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
1207185-005A MW-30 07102012 7/1012012 1100h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
Kyle F. Gross 1207185-005B MW-30 07102012 7/10/2012 1100h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
Laboratory Director 1207185-006A MW-31 07092012 7/9/2012 1335h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
Jose Rocha 1207185-006B MW-31 07092012 7/9/2012 1335h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
1207185-007A MW-35 07102012 7110/2012 1410h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
QA Officer 8260C/5030C
1207185-007B MW-35 07102012 7/10/2012 1410h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
1207185-008A MW-36 07112012 7/11/2012 915h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
1207185-008B MW-36 07112012 7/1112012 915h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
1207185-009A MW-65 07112012 7/1112012 951h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
1207185-009B MW-65 07112012 7/1112012 951h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
1207185-010A Trip Blank 7/9/2012 Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 7123/2012 Page 2 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
___ 1. ----.•.•• ____ .C ... l. --------.c ... t...: ________ • _____ ._ ............... t... .... _ .... c :.,.. ,.. ... "'c/: ..... _ ........... _ .... ...In'''.; ............ ++h;ro .. "" ...... " .... ; ......... "' ......... o ..... t11"\ .... ,,'1t1, thpo "lorhrprtfcpt'npnt nT'f'ltTH"\tiAn (,\T' ,,~1,... nf ~n\l n,..,(vhu,t Or T"Irn(",p<:!c;: ()T';n ~()nnp.~tl()n with thf": re-nllhlica.tion of this renort for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Denison Mines
JoAnn Tischler
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
1207185
7/12/2012
7/9, 7/10 & 7/1112012
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis of all samples was
performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports. The samples were not digested pursuant to the
client request.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 3 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use ofthe addressee. Pl1vileges of
.. Hk .... ",.nn"" ....... HC!'" ..... 4='t1-...o ............... ". nf"t'h;c "''''''''T'I<:)nv ..... r 'In,, n'p,.,., .... u",. ..... f;t" d~ff nr rpnT'n~l1rt;('\n nfth1<! Tf"nnrt -in ('.nnnpr':tinn with thp: anvertis,p.mf:nt nrmTIot.inn or sale of anv nroduct or nrocess. or in connection 'with the re-nublication of this report for any
Volatile Case Narrative
American West Client: ANALYTICAL LABORATORI ES Denison Mines
JoAnn Tischler
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-rnail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
1207185
7112/2012
7/9, 7/10 & 7/1112012
Intact
None
SW -846 8260C/5030C
Tetrahydrofuran
General Set Comments: Tetrahydrofuran was not observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 4 of 41
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located 011 the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
.. ~.1.. ....................... H ............ .&:'+'k .................................. k; ...... " ......... ,., ...... ' ............... H ........ on-o'h""'''" ",f';t" ... t.,f'f' ",. f"pnT'I'V~l1rtll"\n "ftht<:' rp"nrt in ('{\nnpr.f;nn w;th thp. ~rlvp:rtispm~nt-nrnmotion or sale of anv nroduct or orocess. or in connection with the re-publication oftbis re ort for an
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1207185
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS VOC 071312 Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 071312 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
LCS VOC 071312 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 071312 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 071312 Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_Q_C ___ SlIM_MARX __ RE~Ql~~I __
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlglL SW8260C 17.8 20.00 0 88.8 43-146
%REC SW8260C 55.2 50.00 110 76-138
%REC SW8260C 50.1 50.00 100 77-121
%REC SW8260C 55.0 50.00 110 67-128
%REC SW8260C 49.4 50.00 98.9 81-135
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
7/13/2012 725h
7/13/2012 725h
7/13/2012 725h
7/13/2012 725h
7/1312012 725h
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 24 of 41
nalyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
ber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYT !CAL LABORATOR I ES
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1207185
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 071312A Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 071312A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 071312A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 071312A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 071312A Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPOR.T
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
%REC SW8260C 54.8 50.00 110 76-138
%REC SW8260C 54.6 50.00 109 77-121
%REC SW8260C 54.6 50.00 109 67-128
%REC SW8260C 51.0 50.00 102 81-135
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
7/13/2012 803h
7/13/2012 803h
7/13/2012 803h
7113/2012 803h
7/13/2012 803h
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 25 of 41
analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
nber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1207185
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1207185-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
1207185-001AMS Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1207185-001AMS Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1207185-001AMS Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
1207185-001AMS Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
_Q~ ___ SJ1MMARY_REP.Q_R_I __ _
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlglL SW8260C 19.3 20.00 0 96.3 43-146
%REC SW8260C 55.9 50.00 112 72-151
%REC SW82.60C 51.3 50.00 103 80-128
%REC SW8260C 54.7 50.00 109 80-124
%REC SW8260C 49.6 50.00 99.3 77-129
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
7113/2012 957h
7/13/2012 957h
7/13/2012 957h
7/13/2012 957h
7/13/2012 957h
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 26 of 41
nalyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
ber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYT !CAL LABORATOR !ES
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1207185
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1207185-001AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
1207185-001AMSD SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1207185-001AMSD SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1207185-001AMSD SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1207185-001 AMSD SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
_Q~BUMMARYREPQ_&_L
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
~glL SW8260C 17.0 20.00 0 85.0 43-146
%REC SW8260C 55.1 50.00 110 72-151
%REC SW8260C 50.4 50.00 101 80-128
%REC SW8260C 54.1 50.00 108 80-124
%REC SW8260C 49.2 50.00 98.4 77-129
%RPD
12.5
RPD
Limit
25
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
7/13/2012 1017h
7/13/2012 1017h
7/13/2012 1017h
7/13/2012 1017h
7/13/2012 1017h
Report Date: 7/23/2012 Page 27 of 41
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
.ber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J72L1851.D
13 Jul 2012 8:41 am
1207185-001A
SAMP 5.0ML SB
7 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Jul 13 08:54:32 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jun 27 10:22:19 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance
15000001
TIC: J72L 1851.0\data.ms
1450000j
1400000j
i
13500001
13000001
I
1250000j i
1200000j ~ I ~ j ~
11500001 D
110000011 1
1050000, I
10000001 I I
9500001 j I
9000001 ~ Iii!
8500001
(J) ai c: ~ c: Ql ..c e o
1
i
8000001 ,II III
1 II 750000j ~
I I! il
7000001 II II
6500001 I I
600000 j ~ (J) II II
550000',1
1
~ ! I II I I I
500000 ~ ~ II
I 1 ~ II
::::::1 i ~ I
350000j I I
3000001 I II I ,
250000 i 1\ I II il
20oo00! 11:1 II III I II I I I
1500001 II 1111 : il I
100000j [I I II II I I ,I /1 I 'I'! I
500001
1
' i; I'l'll II 1'\ 1\ "l I! I! I II
o f-~~T 1\; 1-"-' -r-; -:; -r-:r{r::-:;:.:;--Fj'-;= =r'T"TT""T,-J 1 \'"""~ 1-; l--, -'",' ',-'-~'rL+-r-r",.,J+T"""rT_L~~r--;--f ~"""F",-'-11 Y"l"T"r~-Y'j ",[OfT f-FT;=T---~·-TT=;--r=-'-='T,.o.--=1' T'" T
L50 2.90 2.5J> 3.00 3~§..Q 4:QO _,t~O 5.QO .~.§O 6.00 §.qO 7.00 . 7:50 !3.00 Jt50 9.00 . ~.50 tQ.O~_ 19.50 11.0.0 11.50
AFULLW_59.M Fri Jul 13 08:55:03 2012 Report Date: 7 /23/2<f1~gEPagdQ8 of 41
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J81L1852.D
13 Jul 2012 11:33 am
1207185-002A
SAMP 5.0ML SB
16 Sample Multiplier: 1
Jul 13 13:08:10 2012
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Jun 27 10:22:19 2012
Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance ----------TIC: J81 L 1852.D\data.ms
15000001
1450000j
I
1400000j
13500001
1300000J
i
12500001
12000001
1 1150000j
I
1100000
1
10500001
1 I
10000001
9500001
I 900000j
8500001
8000001
7500001
I
700000j
I
650000j
600000j
550000. i a;
5000001 !
4500001 ~
1 D ~
4000001 ~ "'.
350000, ~ I ~ I 1,'l
i
I I I;
3000001, I I II I
250000J
1
, , III" II ',',I I i i\ !!I I
I
! Ii I, il
2000001 r Ii I' Ii I
I I II ':!
100000i I i!i I i,i, •
1500001 I II 1,1) I i",ll J'
I II II I i Ii
i i II II I q 5000:~~~rTr;Tr;=;'TTcCC;T~C JA~,~, ~~U,~' L'T~ ~r~TTTTT'T~T']~M
Time--> 1 :?O __ ~.OO 2.50 3.99 ~._?9 _ 4.90 4~50 ~OO _ §.§Q 6.00 6:50 7 ~Q 1.50 8~00 8:?Q 9.00 ___ ~_.§Q _ 1,0.0_0 10·?9 11·Q9_ 1 U?Q
AFULLW_59.M Fri Jul 13 13:08:37 2012 Report Date: 7 /23/2@1(~gEPagd29 of 41
I
.1
I
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J84L1853.D
13 Jul 2012 12:30 pm
1207185-003A
SAMP 5.0ML SB
19 Sample Multiplier: 1
Jul 13 13:11:01 2012
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Jun 27 10:22:19 2012
Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance
. 14500001
TIC: J84L1853.D\data.ms
1400000J
1350000
13000001
I
12500001
1200000j
11500001 I
11000001
10500001
1000000j
9500001
I
9000001
I
8500001
8000001
750000
AFULLW_59 .M Fri Jul 13 13:11:28 2012
f (I)
:0 ~ d: :::l co I I I
I
;;j
"% c: CI> ~ CI> ..t .c ~ en "9
0 :g (I)
:E c: (I) 0 (I) ~ N Cl c: (I) f0-CI> .c .c !Q ~ ~
0 0
:::l :E 15 CJ
~ i5 i ~ :0 en
Report Date: 7 /23/2@'1~gEl>agdBO of 41
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Abundance
. 1.ae+07j
I
1
1.7e+071
I
1.Se+07j
I
1.se+07j
I
1.4e+071
1.3e+07
I 1.2e+07j
I
1.1e+071
I
1e+071
9000000
aoooooo
I
7000000
SOOOOOO
50000001
I
4000000
3000000
1 2000000
1000000
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J85L1854.D
13 Jul 2012 12:49 pm
1207185-004A
SAMP 5.0ML SB
20 Sample Multiplier: 1
Jul 13 13:16:09 2012
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Jun 27 10:22:19 2012
Initial Calibration
Q) "C .~
:E t)
Q) s:: Q) ~ Q) :::!!
oh-,-, -, -I 'r" iii I ' , i 'l""" , 1 '
Tin:!e--> 1.50 2.QQ ~~9 ;3.00 3:§0
AFULLW_59.M Fri Jul 13 13:16:35 2012
(QT Reviewed)
Report Date: 7/23/2@1QgEPagdBl of 41
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J86L1855.D
13 Jul 2012 1:08 pm
1207185-005A
SAMP 5.0ML SB
21 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Jul 13 13:22:53 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jun 27 10:22:19 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: J86L 1855.D\data.ms . i
1500000j
14500001
1400000j
13500001 i
1300000j
I
12500001 i
12000001 I
1150000j
11000001
10500001
I
10000001
9500001 I
9000001
850000j
800000 j
I
750000 j
I
7000001
650000
550000
AFULLW_59.M Fri Jul 13 13:23:31 2012
Lli '9 ~ CD N <:: CD .Q E 0 :2 (,)
0 I-~
en cD <:: CD N <:: ~ CD .Q '9 e CD 0 <:: ::l CD 15 ~ E CD e .Q e m 0
!5 :2 0 en a
..1-.
0 I-~
Report Date: 7/23/201i2gEPkgdB2 of 41
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J87L1856.D
13 Jul 2012 1:27 pm
1207185-006A
SAMP 5.0ML SB
22 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Jul 16 07:09:38 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jun 27 10:22:19 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance
1450000j i
14000001
TIC: J87l1856.D\data.ms
I
13500001
13000001
i
12500001
I !
1200000 1
1
11500001
!
11000001
I
1050000j 1
1000000 j
I 950000 1 I
900000l
I
850000j
I
8000001
I
750000j
7000001 !
6500001
I
600000i ~
Ii en C;!I t -I 550000 1 ~ ~ I:
5000001 1 I I
4500001 ] ~ I
400000j ~ ~ II
!
f Ii f I
I
I
I II iI ,I
!I
II
II
II I'
II
II
I' II
en 0) c CD N C CD ..c e o
,
I en II
350000 i j II ;;
300000 1 ~ II I Ii
I I II II!I
250000i ': Ii II Ii
j I Ii 'I II II I I II II II
200000i 11 11 I:,i.,1 ii' ,i,i", i I I I: I Ii
150000j I II il I II Ii
! I II II I II :1 l:::::L~~~-n~~T~lJ~LJLJl"'-'l ,-r.JUL~~Y~'''C~~'T~TrTT"Fprj''F'
J ~5Q _2.00 .2.50 3.09 ~~§O 4.00 4~~Q ~OO 5.5Q 6.00 §"c-50 . TOg 7~~Q 8.00 8~59 _~~J)Q _~.~.o to.Q.Q 10 . .50 1 L Q..o. 1 L.50
AFULLW_59.M Mon Jul 16 07:10:13 2012 Report Date: 7/23/201ClgEPag~3 of 41
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J88L1857.D
13 Jul 2012 1:46 pm
1207185-007A
SAMP 5 .0ML SB
23 Sample Multiplier: 1
Jul 16 07:10:42 2012
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Jun 27 10:22:19 2012
Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance . I TIC: J88L 1857.D\data.ms
1 1350000 j
i
13000001 I
12500001
1200000 1
I 1150000,
I
11000001
10500001
I
10000001
I 9500001
I
900000 1
850000 j
i
800000 j
750000 i I
700000 1
6500001 I
AFULLW_59.M Mon Jul 16 07:11:04 2012
'" "'C cD c:
~ ~ c: 1 Q) ..GJ
It: CD
j as ~ i
*
:p
I ~
.,f ~ c:
I1:l c: Q) .Ll E ~ en (.)
:g c
Q) ..t_
~ 0 Q) ~ .1:l E 0 :::> "6 E E aJ
:; en
I
Report Date: 7/23/2@1QgEPage434 of 41
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J89L1858.D
13 Jul 2012 2:06 pm
1207185-008A
SAMP 5.0ML SB
24 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Jul 16 07:11:32 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jun 27 10:22:19 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance
14000001
TIC: J89L 1858.D\data.ms
1350000j
13000001
12500001
12000001
11500001
I
11000001
I
10500001
10000001
950000
9000001
!
8500001
1
800000j
!
7500001
7000001 I
6500001
I
cD c: ~ c: CD .l:l e o ::I iI o ~
600000j I
I il
550000 j ~ ~ II
I ffi ~ II
500000 1 ~ 2l II
450000 11 i ~ Iii e ~ I
4000001 ~ ~ II
~ 1 It: CI) ~ 't :0
(/)
Lri cD
"C c: ..f CD cD N ~ c: c: CD CD ~ .l:l e ~ 1l 0
~ ::I CD 'i5 .l:l e E .2 e .<: al 0
::I i (/)
350000 j II I
3000001 I II I II I ~ I II Ii I
2500001 .11 II' III Ii I' I II I Iii II
200000j ,II "II' I I! :
I :1 I I ,I
1500001 Ii I II I II I i 11 II I II I
100000j II I II I i II II I II Ii II II!I
; 5000:~4'rrrr"~ri","T~'rF,_~lJUL~~L~Trr~Ff"~~~'1~
Tlllle--> 1.:59 _ ?OO ?5Q .~t90 _ ~·§9 .. ~~.oO _.1:~Q . 5.QO§.~9 6.00 !L~O . ~.OO ?5Q 8.:00 . .?.!..50 ~.OO 9~§.0 _ 10.Q9_19.5Q 11.9~t t1.50
AFULLW_59.M Mon Jul 16 07:11:53 2012 Report Date: 7123/2<f1i2gEPagd6S of 41
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J90L1859.D
13 Jul 2012 2:25 pm
1207185-009A
SAMP 5.0ML SB
25 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Jul 16 07:12:46 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jun 27 10:22:19 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: J90L1859.D\data.ms
1
1.ge+07i
I 1.8e+071
1.7e+07!
I 1.6e+07i i
1.5e+07j
i 1.4e+07j
I
1.3e+07j
I
1.2e+071
1.1e+07j
I
1e+07j
I
9000000j
I
8000000j
I
7000000 j
6000000
I i 50000001
I w i ~ ~ 40000001 w ~ ~ i a> '" ~ Q)
I ~ ~i ~ ~ 1
30000001 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '5 I e Q)~ ~ ~ E
1 ~ g ~~ 0 ~
2000000j ~ 1 ~ ~ a3 ~ ~ ~
100000:L"""" '~--"--'i --'.--"--';--'--TPTJl;. ,~~c~.J'Tm.L .~ml., ... " ""', .. ' .,. """',. ,
Time--> 1 ~5Q g~99 g~~Q 3 .. QQ. ~:..~Q . ~.OQ 1:~Q _ 5.00 .§.50 6~QQ 6.50 Z:09 Z.~Q 8.00 8:.5Q ~.QQ ___ ~.§Q 10.00 1 O.~Q 1J ·9Q. 1.L?9
AFULLW_59.M Mon Jul 16 07:13:11 2012 Report Date: 7/23/20'lclgEPkgdB6 of 41
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J91L8510.D
13 Jul 2012 2:44 pm
1207185-010A
SAMP 5.0ML SB
26 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Jul 16 07:13:41 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jun 27 10:22:19 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: J91 L8510.D\data.ms
1400000j
I i 13500001 I
13000001
I 12500001
1
1200000j
I
11500001 I
1100000j
I I 1050000j
10000001 I
9500001
900000j
I
850000j
I
8000001
I
750000j 1 7000001 I
650000j ! I II I II 600000~ II
I ~ wi
5500001 I g I
5000001 ) i III I g ~ I
450000 j ~ ~ II 4000001 ~ i !
3500001 I ~
I I II 300000~ I I 1'1 I I, I ~ II I II
2500001 ·11 II i 1'\
i II I I I
2000001 I! /1 I ' Ii I
I ~II 1\ I II
150000j ~ II II II II I
I ~ II II ,I I II II 1000001 0 II II 1\ I II II 5000:~+~~T'=r~LuLLJUUl~'TR'~T'W~TrTT~
Ti!!1e--> 1:§Q . 2.0Q ~.5Q 3.0Q ].§_Q 4.0Q .4.§.Q 5:Q9 _ 5J>_9 ._ ~:..O_Q . §.:50 _ 7 :.QQ 7~§Q 8.09 '?:.~9 9.0Q ... ~.~ 1 0:Q9 _ 19·§.Q 11 J>Q. 11.50
AFULLW_59.M Mon Jul 16 07:14:02 2012 Report Date: 7/23/201ClgEPkgdB7 of 41
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J68LCS20.D
13 Jul 2012 7:25 am
LCS VOC 071312A
(QT Reviewed)
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise LCS SEE COVERSHEET FOR ID AND AMOUNT JO
ALS Vial 3 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Jul 13 07:37 :18 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jun 27 10 :22:19 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
Abundance
25
2400000
2100000
2000000 :
18000001
!
1700000;
1600000:
1500000
i
1400000!
1
1300000'
1200000:
1100000!
1000000:
9000001
I
800000:
I 700000'
I
I
600000i
5000001
400000:
I 300000:
I
200000' I
100000:
Ii
AFULLW_59 .M Fri Jul 13 11:52:55 2012
TIC: J68LCS20.D\data.ms
en
I I
Report Date: 7/23/2<f'li2gEPagd68 of 41
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Abundance
. I
15000001
I 1450000 '
1400000
13500001
I
1300000 j
12500001
I 12000001 i
1150000 j
I
1100000 1
10500001
I
1000000 1
I
950000 1
900000 j
I
850000 1
8000001 i ! 750000 j
! 700000 J
650000 i
1 j 600000 l
5500001
500000i
4500001
400000 i
I
350000j
I
300000j
! 250000 i
I
200000 j
150000i !
100000j
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J70LMBLK.D
13 Jul 2012 8:03 am
MB VOC
MBLK
071312A
5.0ML JO
5 Sample Multiplier: 1
Jul 13 08:21:12 2012
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Jun 27 10:22:19 2012
Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
TIC: J70LMBLK.D\data.ms
::::> en
Ii
!I
I ~
cD c: CD N c: CD .Q E g
iI
0 I-!!2
11 ; II ' !i
rr.. a) 1 I t :c
r
\
en cD
iii c: ..fC CD "0 N "9 cb c: CD CD c: .Q c: CD E CD N ~ c: 0 (I) ::::> CD .Q '5 .Q E E E .Q 0 .s:: E :E (.) III CJ
0 :s is I-..t. !!2 en
0 ~
500001 Ii 11 Ii Ii iI II it
o f:~::::-T':::;::f~~~T··:;::::l--=':-:::T::::;=;::,:r=-T'-'-::;:::"'=i·=T=r=r'T·T"'"f-""'-c-.~, ,J,l~T)IJ~-,p~"_'~TL~, ~, ~I .--~'~~r~,L~t""!""""";''T'T''''''-'f''''i~ri'~l=T=F·Ti~'T=F='=TT"="='T'r=r';=r"!'''r='Y'l'''T-T''i'''T''f''T
[j'!l"e..::~;::.. J ~5Q .?-!QQ ,?§Q 3.QQ.~~§Q .4~QQ 1~!m _ ,§.Q.o .§~§'9 ,,§~Q9 , §:.?Q._ . Z:.QQ . ?§.Q ,~.-QO " ,~3,.5Q . ,~&Q . ~~§.9 1 Q~9_0"JQ.§'Q. JJ_.,QQ Jt.!5.Q_
AFULLW_59.M Fri Jul 13 08:21:38 2012 Report Date: 7/23/201clgEPage4W of 41
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J76S1851.D
13 Jul 2012 9:57 am
1207185-001AMS
MS 5.0ML 20F3 SB
11 Sample Multiplier: 1
Jul 13 10:09:56 2012
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Jun 27 10:22:19 2012
Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: J76S1851.D\data.ms . I
1700000 j I
I
1600000 1
15000001
I 14000001 I
j
AFULLW_59.M Fri Jul 13 12:52:49 2012
ai c ~ c ~ o ::;, Ii:
u)
"9 Q)
c ~ c Q)
.0 E o ::2 (,)
o
1
i
H
Ii
" I!
Ii ! Ci:
I ~
II
II
I
IQ) ,e:: I ~ I e. 1c/5 IE
Report Date: 7 /23/2<fJc~gEPage41.0 of 41
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL12-C\13JUL12\
J77D1851.D
13 Jul 2012 10:17 am
1207185-001AMSD
MSD 5.0ML 30F3 SB
12 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Jul 13 10:28:58 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_59.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jun 27 10:22:19 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance
1800000 j
TIC: J77D1851.D\data.ms
I
17000001 i
1600000!
15000001
14000001
13000001
1200000!
I
1100000 j
I 10000001
i 900000 i
800000i i I
700000j
I 600000j I i
!
5000001
1 I
4000001
3000001 I
200000i
AFULLW_59.M Fri Jul 13 12:53:43 2012
u) "0 cb c: !!l c: Q)
U) ~
cO e 0 ~ ~ Q) :::J ~ ~
:; 1 en
~
..f' "9 Q) c: Q)
en ~ Q) ai .J:l c: 0 Ii i C .JI) I a i I ~ ! Ci)
Report Date: 7 /23/2@1~gEPage4\.1 of 41
American West Analytical Laboratories
WORK ORDER Summary
Client:
Client ID:
Denison Mines
DENIOO Contact: JoAnn Tischler
UL
Denison
Work Order: 1207185
Page 1 of 1 7/13/2012
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2012 QC Level: LEVEL III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush .. QC 3 & Summary. EDD-EIM into Locus Database. Report THF to 1 /lgIL. Samples were field filtered.; . e4Q,
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date
120718S-001A ~VV-ll_07112012 7/11/20121210h
120718S-00lB
SEL Analytes: S~
120718S-002A ~VV-14_07112012 7/1112012 1235h
1207185-002B
SEL Analytes: SN
120718S-003A ~VV-2S_07102012 7110/20121220h
120718S-003B
~.EI.J Analytes: SN
1207185-004A ~VV-26_07112012 7/11120120951h
120718S-004B
Received Date Date Due
7112/20121345h 7/23/2012
Matrix
Aqueous
Test Code
8260-VV
200.8-DIS
8260-VV
200.8-DIS
8260-W
200.S-DIS
Sel Storage
~ VOCFridge
~ MET
~ VOCFridge
~ MET
~ -'VOCFridge
----~ MET
8260-VV ~ VOCFridge
----------------------200.8-DIS ~ MET
.. SE!:_Analytes: SN .. ----------------------------.. _._---==:-~ 120718S-00SA ~VV-30_07102012 7/10/20121100h 8260-VV VOCFridge
120718S-00SB 200.8-DIS ~ MET
SEL An~!ytes: SN
1207185-006A ~VV-31_07092012 7/9/20121335h 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge
1207185-006B
---------_._----=
200.8-DIS ~ MET
SEL ~nalytes: SN
1207185-007A ~VV-35_07102012 7110/2012141011 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge --.. ---_ .. _-
120718S-007B 200.8-DIS MET
SEL Allalytes: SN ...
1207185-008A ~-36_07112012 7/11120120915h 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge
1207185-008B 200.8-DIS ~ MET
SEL Analytes: SN
120718S-009A ~W-6S_07112012 7/1112012095111 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge
1207 I 85-009B 200.8-DIS ~ MET
.. _-SEL Analytes_~ .. ~.N -------_ .. ------. -1207185-01OA Trip Blank 7/9/2012 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M!:V RT ~ CN tV TAT IV' QC V HOK~ HOK __ _ HOK __
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
GC-~ , fLo, l <oS-
TN, -s~lctrd \·0 vev 'Pygecf-A-c VI2(J2
OENISOJ)~ Sheet 1 of 1
MINES
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: American West Analytical Lab
463 West 3600 South
Contact: Garrin Palmer or David Turk
Ph: 4356782221
Salt Lake City, Ut 84115 [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
p . rOJect S amp ers N arne 5 amp ers S' Ignature
3rd Quarter Ground -::)IUWJ(., }/.l~~ 1 Water 2012 Tanner Holliday
Date Time
Sample 10 Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
-MW .. 11 07112012 7/11/2012 1210 THF, TIN
'MW--14 07112012 7/11/2012 1235 THF, TIN
. MW-25 07102012 7/10/2012 1220 THF, TIN
MW-26 07112012 7/11/2012 951 THF, TIN
MW-30 07102012 7/10/2012 1100 THF, TIN
MW-31 07092012 7/9/2012 1335 THF, TIN
MW-35 07102012 7/10/2012 1410 THF, TIN
. MW-36 07112012 7/11/2012 915 THF, TIN
MW-65 07112012 7/11/2012 951 THF, TIN
Trip Blank 7/912012 III
Please notify Garrin Palmer or Tanner HOII~Y'~dReciePt,~ae on these sample~ Immediately!
Thank you. StAYnN_Q~ w·eYQ e.A\I , +\' ... ..A-e-' '/1'6/12-,
Relinquished By':(~ignature) .'''''''' /,<,:,~ v~.:· {_<::l -~ .. C-:: "'v I //V
Relinquished By:(Signature)
Date/Time
1/n../J1:
. \J.f~
Date/Time
Lab Set ID: \2 ... Q:] \ l2>S
Samples Were: COC Tape Was: Container Type: No. Ree.
o Shipped By: Present on Outer p~ge -Q A W AL Supplied Plastic
~and Delivered DYes 0 No /A o ~L Supplied Clear Glass
o AJJ.lbient Unbroken on Outer ~age o A WA~lied Amber Glass
rn-thilled DYes 0 No /A o A WAL SUPPI::CITOX Vials
Temperature \. '0 °C ", Present on sa~ o Amber 0 Clear 0 Heer ace DNo Headspace
Rec. Broken/Leaking DYes ~o ON/A DYes 0 No /A o Non A WAL Supplied Con~
Notes: Unbroken on sa~ Notes: ~Ae..1/11 / DYes DNo /A
Properly Preserved 1UIYes ONo ON/A Notes:
Notes:
/
Rec. Within Hold
Notes:
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TP04
TPH
Procedure: 1 )
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
&Yes DNo Discrepancies Between Labels and COC
Preservative All pHs OK '-(X::)t -oOL
pH <2 H2S04
pH <2 H2SO4
PH >12 NaOH
pH <2 HN03 I"O:C; l~oS;
pH <2 H2SO4 I I
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH> 9NaOH, ZnAC
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H3P04
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2HCL
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
Notes:
-CO~ --00+ -oos -OCXc> -oC~1
,10& \19£ \/0;:; I\J-o£ \/0£ t v V I 7
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag eoe and notify client for further instructions
Place client conversation on coe
Samples may be adjusted at client request
-005 ~
I \IPS:' Ive&. , I
DYes ~
/2.
JoAnn Tischler
Denison Mines
1050 17th Street, # 950
American West Denver, CO 80265
ANALYTI CAL LAB ORATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
TEL: [phone]
RE: Semi Annual Ground Water
Dear JoAnn Tischler: Lab Set ID: 1208066
American West Analytical Laboratories received 2 sample(s) on 8/3/2012 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Association Conference (NELAC) Institute in Utah and Texas;
and is state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri. In addition,
A W AL is also accredited by the American Analytical Laboratory Association (A2LA) on
ISO IEC 17025:2005, Department of Defense (DOD), UST for the State of Wyoming, and
the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). All analyses were
performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute and/or A2LA protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
J'1 Ky I e F. Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
DN: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
0l;l=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G emaiJ=[e-mail], c=US r OS S' Date: 2012.d~ 1414:22:01 -06'00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 8/1412012 Page 1 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useoft~e name of this comp'any or any member of its staff:: or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection v:ith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or saleof any product or process, orin connection with the re:publication of this report forany
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Denison Mines
Semi Annual Ground Water
1208066
Date Received: 8/3/2012 1100h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
1208066-001A MW-37 07302012
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
1208066-001B MW-37 07302012
1208066-002A Trip Blank
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Date Collected Matrix Analysis
7/30/2012 1340h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
7130/2012 1340h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
7/30/2012 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 8/14/2012 Page 2 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. oft~e name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale .of any product or pro?ess, or in connection with the re.-publication ofthisreport for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
;:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Denison Mines
JoAnn Tischler
Semi Annual Ground Water
1208066
8/03/2012
7/30/2012
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis of all samples was
performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports. The samples were not digested pursuant to the
client request.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 8114/2012 Page 3 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection \\lith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, orin connection with the re.-publication of t?is report for any
Volatile Case Narrative
American West Client: ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Denison Mines
JoAnn Tischler
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
;:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
Semi Annual Ground Water
1208066
8/03/2012
7/30/2012
Intact
None
SW -846 8260CIS030C
Tetrahydrofuran
General Set Comments: Tetrahydrofuran was not observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 8/1412012 Page 4 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, promotion or sale.of any product or pro~ess, or in connection with the re:publication of t~isreport for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1208066
Project: Semi Annual Ground Water
Sample ID Analyte
LCS VOC 08061 Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 08061 SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
LCS VOC 08061 SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 08061 SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 08061 SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
_ .. QC SUM_MARY_RE_PQBI_
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlglL SW8260C 16.0 20.00 0 80.2 43-146
%REC SW8260C 50.8 50.00 102 76-138
%REC SW8260C 49.3 50.00 98.5 77-121
%REC SW8260C 50.3 50.00 101 67-128
%REC SW8260C 49.9 50.00 99.8 81-135
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
8/6/2012 714h
8/6/2012 714h
8/6/2012 714h
8/6/2012 714h
8/6/2012 714h
Report Date: 8/14/2012 Page 8 of17
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTI CAL LABORATORIES
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1208066
Project: Semi Annual Ground Water
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 08061 Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 08061 SUIT: 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 08061 SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 08061 SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 08061 SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
_Q_C_~U_M_M_ARY lU3~_PQRI_
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
/lglL SW8260C < 1.00
%REC SW8260C 50.4 50.00 101 76-138
%REC SW8260C 51.6 50.00 103 77-121
%REC SW8260C 49.2 50.00 98.5 67-128
%REC SW8260C 50.0 50.00 100 81-135
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
8/6/2012 752h
8/6/2012 752h
8/6/2012 752h
8/6/2012 752h
8/6/2012 752h
Report Date: 8/14/2012 Page 9 of 17
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1208066
Project: Semi Annual Ground Water
Sample ID Analyte
1208066-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
1208066-001AMS SUIT: 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1208066-001AMS SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1208066-001 AMS SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1208066-001 AMS SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
_QC_SJJMMAJlY_REPDBI_
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
flglL SW8260C 14.5 20.00 0 72.7 43-146
%REC SW8260C 53.4 50.00 107 72-151
%REC SW8260C 49.3 50.00 98.5 80-128
%REC SW8260C 52.0 50.00 104 80-124
%REC SW8260C 49.6 50.00 99.1 77-129
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
8/6/2012 908h
8/6/2012 908h
8/6/2012 908h
8/6/2012 908h
8/6/2012 908h
Report Date: 8114/2012 Page 10 of 17
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1208066
Project: Semi Annual Ground Water
Sample ID Analyte
1208066-001 AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
1208066-001AMSD SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1208066-001 AMSD SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1208066-001 AMSD SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1208066-001 AMSD SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
___ Q_C_~UMM_A_&Y_RE_P_QR_I_
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlglL SW8260C 13.2 20.00 0 66.2 43-146
%REC SW8260C 52.1 50.00 104 72-151
%REC SW8260C 50.0 50.00 99.9 80-128
%REC SW8260C 51.6 50.00 103 80-124
%REC SW8260C 49.5 50.00 99.0 77-129
%RPD
9.28
RPD
Limit
25
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
8/6/2012 927h
8/6/2012 927h
8/6/2012 927h
8/6/2012 927h
8/6/2012 927h
Report Date: 8/14/2012 Page 11 of 17
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached CDC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUG12-C\06AUG12\
R32L0661.D
6 Aug 2012 8:11 am
1208066-001A
SAMP 5.0ML 10F3 SB
6 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Aug 06 08:23:50 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_60.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jul 27 07:53:44 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance 15000001
TIC: R3'2L0661.D\data.ms
14500001
1400000!
13500001
13000001
1250000
1200000; I
1150000J
11000001
1050000j
1 000000 i
I
950000j I I I 900000i
850000i
8000001
750000J
700000j
650000j
6000001
5500001
500000j
4500001
I
4000001
,
3500001
300000)
2500001
1
200000
150000i I
1000001
50000 1
tf) as ~ ii i f I I
I
I
I "
\
I '1
u; "0 cb c: (]) ~ (]) .c -v" e 0 "9 :E (])
t) c: en Ql
Cl cD ~ ~ c: Ql ~ Q) .c N f c: CD (]) .c £ e 0 as :::J ~ t;:: 0 E co e l+-co ~ ~
I :::J en
I !
1
) 11 ;i ,; " !I 0·:,;-:::-~1~~·:~.:::::1 .. :::::::.,::.~~;,:~\-.r-·:r-::::;=::~r::~:;,-,.-::·1::::::;::::;:::'::"-::;'::::~':'::::":':1-.····:·;::~:·;,~"",;."=·'f"""":. '.--;---. ',-'., -, i-,.-.,.''I"L..Li. -,----'. "U.~.L~-r-, -'. -, ,-, -I' ~";\'i'~'" '-f .. -,.~. ; '. L;.~_,-".U>-r--~. "t.t"u~"f":'''''f.'~'~'; .----------.-.. -.---.... ----.. ----,----.--~.~.-'-'"-... ,...:c'''''':~''''~=:;::~.,;,.?:::'P::·T~~::..=r-:::::f::::~::::::::::::::::::::=:::;:.7:-i" .. : .. .,.--, .... -, ..... , ...... ' ..... r·_··· .. ·T····T···-r-·'r--.,--r·-T·--i--·r····-
Time--> 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_60.M Mon Aug 06 08:24:29 2012 Report Date: 8114/201(2gEPage412 of 17
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUG12-C\06AUG12\
R34L0662.D
6 Aug 2012 8:49 am
1208066-002A
SAMP 5.0ML 10F3 SB
8 Sample Multiplier : 1
Quant Time: Aug 06 09:07:30 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_60.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jul 27 07:53:44 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: R34L0662.D\data.ms
15000001 !
14500001
14000001
13500001
j
13000001
I
12500001
12000001
11500001
,
1100000j
10500001
10000001
950000:
900000!
8500001
8000001
750000 '
700000i
6500001
600000j
5500001
5000001
I
4500001
400000i
I
350000j
3000001
2500001
2000001
150000j
100000
50000J
5 (J)
t: ::> (J)
If) as "0 d, c: ~ '0 f-t: ::> (J)
cD c: Q) N c: Q) ..c e 0 .2 LL.
0 f-!a
a.O (J) "0 d, cD c: c: ~ Q) II) N N V c: c: II) II) Q) ..c ..c c: e e ~ ..2 g c: .c: Q) 'E ..c 0 f 0 E ..2 f-e -£ !a co ~ qs
(J) i tl;
T
I I
I
I I I
O.\~:.T.";~::";::f.".(';.:::~:~l:."T::T::::::::;:::::;:=:'=T::T:::::;::::;::::r::'f''i'' •. ,......,_~~.:L;-_~-JU1,-:-. -. -. -, JL-"1~,~~,~~)li , , . ,1l-r~'.'T."""
Time--> 1.50 2.90 2.50 ~.OO 3.~0 4.0Q 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.~0 8:00 8.5~~::-;-;;;r"i:·;:I9T=~.:~~:~:~i:=,~~::~or.:.r~~:~~i:=:;~~~~~r
AFULLW_60.M Mon Aug 06 09:08 :06 2012 Report Date: 8/14/2@1~gEPage413 of 17
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUG12-C\06AUG12\
R29LCS20.D
6 Aug 2012 7:14 am
LCS VOC 080612A
LCS SEE COVERSHEET FOR ID AND AMOUNT JO
3 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Aug 06 07:26:26 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_60.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jul 27 07:53:44 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance
2700000 j
TIC: R29LCS20.D\data.ms
2600000 1 1 i
2500000 1
2400000 1
2300000 ]
,
2200000 1
2100000j
2000000 1
i
1900000 j
1800000 j
17000001
16000001
1500000
1400000 1
I
1300000 j
1
12000001
I 1100000 1
1 1000000 1
!
900000 j
i
800000 !
AFULLW_60.M Mon Aug 06 07:27:06 2012
~
I i
Report Date: 8/14/lOiwepa~ 1 of17
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUG12-C\06AUG12\
R31LMBLK.D
6 Aug 2012 7:52 am
MB
MBLK
5
VOC 080612A
5.0ML JO
Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Aug 06 08:09:20 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_60.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jul 27 07:53:44 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: R31 LMBLK.D\data.ms
15000001
i
1400000i
13000001
I j
1200000j
[ [
1100000i
I 10000001
I
!
9000001
800000
I
7000001
!
I 6000001
I
500000 1
I I 300000j !
i 2000001
I
1000001
Time-->
AFULLW_60.M Mon Aug 06 08:09:51 2012 Report Date: 8/14/wge Pa~ 1 of 17
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUG12-C\06AUG12\
R35S0661.D
6 Aug 2012 9:08 am
1208066-001AMS
MS 5.0ML 20F3 SB
9 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Aug 06 09:20:34 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_60.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jul 27 07:53:44 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance
27000001
TIC: R35S0661.D\data.ms
26000001
i
25000001
I
24000001
I 23000001
!
22000001
1
2100000j
i
20000001
!
1
1900000j
1800000j
1700000J
1
16000001
!
15000001
14000001
1300000:
1200000!
11000001
10000001
1 I
9000001
j
8000001
I
700000j
6000001
500000 1~ ,eu 1£ iQ) IE
400000i§ a: boP.. l;;:~
300000111
l~ ~
200000t ~
10000011
1
0\)L--
Time--> 1.50
AFULLW_60.M Mon Aug 06 09:21:26 2012
u1 "0 d> c:
I en cD c:
'" ~ as "9 Q) ..c Q) e c: Q) 0 :::l :::l ~ '5 E ~ e :::l ~ rn III
II :s Ii en
!I
Report Date: 8/14/2@1<lgEPage416 of 17
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUG12-C\06AUG12\
R36D0661.D
6 Aug 2012 9:27 am
1208066-001AMSD
MSD 5.0ML 30F3 SB
10 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Aug 06 09:39:37 2012
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_60.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jul 27 07:53:44 2012
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: R36D0661.D\data.ms
2800000~
27000001
26000001
25000001
24000001
2300000:
22000001
21000001
2000000j
19000001
1800000j
17000001 i
16000001 i
15000001 i
14000001
1
1300000i
1 1200000i
1100000;
10000001
9000001
800000j
I
7000001 ! I
600000 i
:C1l 500000j~
:'iil iE 400000ie '!b ~~ 3000001~ ~ ~~
200000ji:5 ~
AFULLW_60.M Mon Aug 06 09:40:38 2012
II) as "C ell c: ~ (5 I-1;:
:::l en
II)
"9 (I) c: (I) N c: (I) .c e :i I r I
.1
~~ "(I) ~
Co
ell
iE
Report Date: 8/14/2@'I~gEPage417 of 17
American West Analytical Laboratories
WORK ORDER Summary
Client:
Client ID:
Project:
Denison Mines
DENIOO
Semi Annual Ground Water
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
QC Level: LEVEL III
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 & Summary. EDD-EIM into Locus Database. Report THF to 1 flg/L.;
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due
1208066-001 A ~VV-37_07302012 7/30/2012134011 8/3/20121100h 8/14/2012
1208066-001B
SEL Analytes: SN
1208066-002A Trip Blank 7/30/2012
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK __ _
UL
Denison
Worl\. Order: 1208066
Page 1 of 1 8/3/2012
WOType: Project
Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
Aqueous 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
200.8-DlS ~ MET
-8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
HOK __ _ HOK __
Sheet 1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: American West Analytical Lab
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Ut 84115
Contact: Garrin Palmer or David Turk
Ph: 4356782221
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
tholl [e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
p . t rOJec S amp ers N arne S amp ers S· t Igna ure
3rd Quarter Ground /I~ Water 2012 Tanner Holliday ""-hA1/111' I
I J
Date Time
Sample ID Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
MW-37 07302012 7/30/2012 1340 THF, TIN
Trip Blank 7/30/2012 TI-/ F
"
Please notify Garrin Palmer or Tanner Holliday of Reciept tempature on these samples Immediately!
Thank you.
Relinquished By:(Signature) Date/Time Received By:(Signature) Date/Time
::jdJfUC-}J~ 812.!2012
1100
Relinquished By:(Signature) Date/Time 0dl=re) ~me
'7' /100
\J !
Samples Were: COC Tape Was:
~Shipped By: 'reV( -X Present on Outer Package
o Hand Delivered r $Yes DNo ON/A
o Ambient Unbroken on Outer package
JirChilled ~ ,let... Jf(Yes DNa ON/A
If Temperature L., °C Present on Sample
Rec. Broken/Leaking DYes %No DN/A DYes DNo ~/A
Notes:
Properly Preserved
Notes:
Rec. Within Hold
Notes:
Bottle Type
Aml1'lOnia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Unbroken on S~Ple
DYes DNo N/A
)4'Yes ONo DN/A Notes:
I
fo"Yes ONo
/\
Preservative All pHs OK I
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H2SO4
PH>12 NaOH
pH <2 HN03 Yef\
pH <2 H2SO4 II
pH <2 H2SO4
pH<2HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH> 9NaOH, ZnAC
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H3P04
pH <2 H2SO4
pH<2HCL
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
l~o?o{J1h Lab Set ID: _________ _
. Container Type:
~ W AL Supplied Plastic
o A W~ Supplied Clear Glass
o AWAL's'1.l.Pplied Amber Glass
o A WAL SU~~OAlTOC/TOX Vials
o Amber 0 Clear Headspace 0 No Headspace
o Non A WAL Suppli~Container
Notes: ~ ~
Discrepancies Between Labels and cac
Notes:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is notpreserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag eoe and notify client for further instructions .
Place client conversation on eoe
Samples may be adjusted at client request
No. Rec.
DYes &No
I ,
www.energylab.com EN:RGY
LAElORATORI E5 Analytltal £XcslhHlcB SinCIJ 1952
:tf.~!eQa, MT 817~472 .. 0711 • Billings. MY 800-735-4489 • Casper, W,{ 888-235-0515
.. :;ili~~~/wy,8Q6"Q86"71 7~ (I Rapid City, Sll 888 .. 612-1225 • College Station, IX 888~690-2218
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
August 10, 2012
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C12070448 Quote 10: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 13 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 7/13/2012 for
analysis.
Sample ID Client Sample ID
C12070448-001 MW-29_071 02012
C12070448-002 MW-32_07092012
C12070448-003 MW-11_07112012
C12070448-004 MW-14_07112012
C12070448-005 MW-25_071 02012
C12070448-006 MW-26_07112012
Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
07/10/12 13:45 07/13/12 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
07/09/1213:15 07/13/12 Aqueous Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
07/11/1212:10 07/13/12 Aqueous Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
Metals by ICP, Dissolved
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated
Sulfate
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
07/11/12 12:35 07/13/12 Aqueous Same As Above
07/10/12 12:20 07/13/12 Aqueous Same As Above
07/11/129:51 07/13/12 Aqueous Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
Metals by ICP, Dissolved
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated
Sulfate
Page 1 of 54
EI\ERGY
LA80RATORI ES
C 12070448-007
C 12070448-008
C 12070448-009
C12070448-010
C 1 2070448-011
C12070448-012
C12070448-013
~'" www.energylab.com
~ Analytical Excs/lsnl:B Sines 7152
Helel\3, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800 .. 735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~i1.1~tt~, WY8&6-686 .. 71 15 • Rapid City, SI) 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
ANAL VTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
MW-30_071 02012 07/10/12 11 :00 07/13/12 Aqueous Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
Metals by ICP, Dissolved
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated
Sulfate
SW8260B VQCs, Standard List
MW-31_07092012 07/09/1213:35 07/13/12 Aqueous Same As Above
MW-35_071 02012 07/10/1214:1007/13/12 Aqueous Same As Above
MW-36_07112012 07/11/129:15 07/13/12 Aqueous Same As Above
MW-65_07112012 07/11/129:51 07/13/12 Aqueous Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
Metals by ICP, Dissolved
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated
Sulfate
Trip Blank 6706 07/09/12 0:00 07/13/12 Aqueous SW8260B VQCs, Standard List
Temp Blank 07/12/12 0:00 07/13/12 Aqueous Temperature
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. The analyses presented in this report were
performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601 , unless otherwise noted.
Radiochemistry analyses were performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2325 Kerzell Lane, Casper, WY 82601 ,
unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical
Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By: c5¥~D LJDl~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2012.08.10 10:55:13 -06:00
Page 2 of 54
WWN.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsllsncB Sines 1$52
~elena,. MT 811-412 .. 0111 • Billings,MT 800-735-4489 . Casper. W'f 888~235-0515
'GUletta. WY.866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672·J225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Sample Delivery Group: C12070448
REVISED/SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT
Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
CASE NARRATIVE
The attached analytical report has been revised from a previously submitted report due to the request by Kathy Weinel on
August 10,2012 to remove the VOC's from samples MW-26 and MW-65. The data presented here reflects this change.
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 40C (±2OC)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are NO (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SO
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002; Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641 , Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001, Radiochemical WY200002; Utah: WY00002; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C836
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that c.ertain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 3 of 54
EN:RGY www.energylab.com . . .. Helena,. MT 877-472-D71 1 • Billings, MT 800-735 .. 4489. Casper, WV 888-235-0515
AnaIytll;aI£XCSIISflCIlSincs 1952 ._ ,~m~1f~"W¥8~6-6B6-7175 • Rapid City, S[) 888-&72-1225. College Station, IX 888-690-2218 L.ABORATORI ES
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
LablD: C12070448-003
Client Sample ID: MW-11_07112012
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Lab ID: C12070448-004
Client Sample ID: MW-14_07112012
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
LablD: C 12070448-005
Client Sample ID: MW-25_07102012
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
LablD: C12070448-006
Client Sample ID: MW-26_07112012
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Report Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
Definitions: QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
7.76 s.U.
Result Units
6.91 s.u.
Result Units
6.94 s.U.
Result Units
7.00 s.U.
H -Analysis performed past recommended holding time.
Qualifiers Rl
H 0.01
Qualifiers Rl
H 0.01
Qualifiers Rl
H 0.01
Qualifiers Rl
H 0.01
Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/11/1212:10
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-H B 07/13/12 13:57 1 ab
Collection Date: 07/11/12 12:35
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-H B 07/13/1213:591 ab
Collection Date: 07/10/12 12:20
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
MeL!
A4500-H B 07/13/12 14:021 ab
Collection Date: 07/11/1209:51
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-H B 07/13/12 14:051 ab
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 26 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.comHelen~ •. MT877 .. 472-0711.Billings.MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY888-235-0515 Ana~/Ex"JJsncIlSil1Cs 1952 b,~,,;Mj!6lf,.wY 8'~& .. 686-7t75. • Rapid City, Sf) 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab ID: C12070448-007
Client Sample ID: MW-30_071 02012
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
LablD: C 12070448-008
Client Sample ID: MW-31_07092012
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
LablD: C 12070448-009
Client Sample ID: MW-35_071 02012
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
LablD: C 12070448-0 1 0
Client Sample ID: MW-36_07112012
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Report RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Definitions: QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
7.17 S.u.
Result Units
7.48 S.u.
Result Units
6.94 S.u.
Result Units
7.18 S.u.
H -Analysis performed past recommended holding time.
Qualifiers Rl
H 0.01
Qualifiers Rl
H 0.01
Qualifiers Rl
H 0.01
Qualifiers Rl
H 0.01
Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/10/12 11 :00
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-H B 07/13/1214:071 ab
Collection Date: 07/09/12 13:35
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
MeL!
A4500-H B 07/13/1214:101ab
Collection Date: 07/10/12 14:10
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-H B 07/13/1214:131 ab
Collection Date: 07/11/1209:15
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-H B 07/13/1214:15/ab
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 27 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Aflalytica/ ExcsIJsncB SilICa '952
H,elena, MT 877 .. 472-0711 • Billings. MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
.~ii.!e.~e, Wv 8&&-~B~-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C12070448-011
Client Sample 10: MW-65_07112012
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Report Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
Definitions: QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
7.03 s.U.
H -Analysis performed past recommended holding time.
MCLI
Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Collection Date: 07/11/1209:51
DateReceived: 07/13/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
H 0.01 A4500-H B 07/13/1214:18/ ab
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 28 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
~/yticI1 Ext;BUBflCB Si11C8 1952 f He"lena, Mt877~472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~ ~)illette,WV 866~$B6-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C 12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2320 B
Sample 10: MBLK
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Sample 10: LCS-6677
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Sample 10: C12070448-008AOUP
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Sample 10: C12070448-009AMS
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
3
3
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
201 mg/L
Sample Duplicate
172 mg/L
ND mg/L
210 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
458 mg/L
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R161902
Run: MANTECH_120713B 07/13/1215:28
5.0
1.0
1.0
Run: MANTECH_120713B 07/13/12 15:44
5.0 100 90 110
Run: MANTECH 120713B 07/13/12 19:29 -
5.0 3.9 10
5.0 10
5.0 3.9 10
Run: MANTECH_120713B 07/13/12 19:45
5.0 105 80 120
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 29 of 54
EI\ERGY
LABORATORiES
www.energyJab.com
Allatytit;al Ex~nsnCB $fRcg 1952
; ,He.iella, MT871-472-011 t " Billings. MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
9i1i~iite:,WV86$~686 .. 7n5 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2540 C
Sample 10: MB-1_120713A Method Blank
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C NO mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-2_120713A Laboratory Control Sample
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 1090 mg/L
Sample 10: C12070433-001A MS Sample Matrix Spike
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 2180 mg/L
Sample 10: C12070448-003A OUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 2020 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: TDS120713A
Run: BAL-1_120713A 07/13/12 15:40
10
Run: BAL-1_120713A 07/13/12 15:40
10 98 90 110
Run: BAL-1 120713A 07/13/12 15:49
10 101 90 110
Run: BAL-1 120713A 07/13/1215:51
10 0.3 5
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 30 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Ana/ytil;aIEx~UI1fWII Sines '952
Helena,. MTB77-472-071 t • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
_ ,~jlle#e, wY 866-686-7175 .. Rapid City, Sf) 888-672-1225 • College Station, lX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-CI B
Sample 10: MBLK9-120719
Chloride
Sample 10: C12070244-001AMS
Chloride
Sample 10: C12070244-001AMSO
Chloride
Sample 10: C12070448-006AMS
Chloride
Sample 10: C12070448-006AMSO
Chloride
Sample 10: LCS35-120719
Chloride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
44.7 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
44.7 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
259 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
255 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
3620 mg/L
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: 120719-CL-TTR-W
Run: TITRATION_120719A 07/19/1214:05
1.0
Run: TITRATION_120719A
1.0 100 90 110
Run: TITRATION 120719A
1.0 100 90 110
Run: TITRATION 120719A
1.0 102 90 110
Run: TITRATION 120719A -
1.0 100 90 110
Run: TITRATION_120719A
1.0 102 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
0.0
1.4
07/19/12 14:49
07/19/12 14:50
10
07/19/12 15:23
07/19/12 15:24
10
07/19/12 15:28
Page 31 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Ana~1 Ext;8HI1f1&B $inC8 1952
Helena, MTB77-472-0711 • Billings. MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
_. ~_, _~ille~Q, WY 86&-686-7175 • Rapid Cfty, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte
Method: A4S00-F C
Sample 10: MBLK
Fluoride
Sample 10: LCS-6892
Fluoride
Sample 10: C12070448-003AMS
Fluoride
Sample 10: C12070448-003AMSO
Fluoride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Count Result Units
Method Blank
NO mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
1.96 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
2.38 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
2.38 mg/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R161878
Run: MANTECH_120713A 07/13/12 11 :08
0.10
Run: MANTECH_120713A 07/13/12 11 :12
0.10 98 90 110
Run: MANTECH 120713A 07/13/1214:01 -
0.10 95 80 120
Run: MANTECH 120713A 07/13/12 14:06 -
0.10 95 80 120 0.0 10
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 32 of 54
www.energylab.com . '" " Helena,MtB77:..412-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515 EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES Allalytit;al Ex"IIIHICB Sines 1952 S""'"
,_ ',. ,~ill~lfe, 'III '66-.86-71 75 • Rapid GIly, SD 88l-672-1225 • CQllege Sialion, TIC 888-698-2218
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: A4500-H B
Sample 10: pH 6.86
pH
Sample 10: pH 6.86
pH
Method: A4500-H B
Sample 10: C12070448-011AOUP
pH
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
6.85 S.u. 0.010 100
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
6.85 S.u. 0.010 100
Sample Duplicate
6.99 s.u. 0.010
98
98
Analytical Run: PHSC_101-C_120713A
07/13/1208:52
102
102
0.6
07/13/12 13:17
Batch: R161844
07/13/12 14:21
3
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 33 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
~Iytic;aIExt;8'IBIICIJ $i1I~ 1952
,' ..•.. ' .. , ' ..• H~lena, MT877-472-0711.-Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
... ~'§j)t~tt~;;Wy8~$~~86-n 75 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station,lX 888-&90-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-NH3 G
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method Blank
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N NO mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.92 mg/L
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.99 mg/L
Sample 10: C12070412-002CMS Sample Matrix Spike
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.92 mg/L
Sample 10: C12070412-002CMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.96 mg/L
Sample 10: C12070448-007CMS Sample Matrix Spike
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 2.04 mg/L
Sample 10: C12070448-007CMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 2.06 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL O/OREC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R162001
Run: TECHNICON_120717A 07/17/12 10:56
0.050
Run: TECHNICON_120717A 07/17/12 10:58
0.050 96 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120717A 07/17/12 11 :00
0.050 102 80 120
Run: TECHNICON_120717A 07/17/12 12:34
0.050 98 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120717A 07/17/12 12:36
0.050 100 90 110 2.1 10
Run: TECHNICON_120717A 07/17/1213:22
0.050 103 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120717A 07/17/12 13:24
0.050 104 90 110 1.0 10
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 34 of 54
EI'.ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
mtytit;af Ex~UIlflt;B SInes 1952
Hel~l1a, MlB77-472-0711 -Billings, MT 800-735-4489 '" Casper, WY 888-235-0515 ",~'§!II~~~,'#r86&-6S6~7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4S00-S04 E
Sample 10: LCS-1_120720
Sulfate
Sample 10: MBLK-1_120720
Sulfate
Sample 10: C12070448-011AMS
Sulfate
Sample 10: C12070448-011AMSO
Sulfate
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Laboratory Control Sample
4600 mg/L
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
2660 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
2640 mg/L
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: 120720_1_S04-TURB-W
Run: TURB-2_120720A 07/20/12 11 :43
100 96 90 110
Run: TURB-2_120720A 07/20/12 11 :46
10
Run: TURB-2_120720A 07/20/12 13:35
50 98 90 110
Run: TURB-2_120720A 07/20/12 13:47
50 95 90 110 0.9 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 35 of 54
EI'fRGY
L ABORATORIES
www.energylab.com r'; .... Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515 ~/yIWIIEx",UsnCB SiwJ 1952 1. '." '" ~' J iUel:fe, WY 866.;686-1175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C 12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count
Method: E200.7
Result Units RL
Sample 10: ICV Initial Calibration Verification Standard
Calcium 48.8 mg/L 0.50
Sample 10: ICSA Interference Check Sample A
Calcium 483 mg/L 0.50
Sample 10: ICSAB Interference Check Sample AB
Calcium 478 mg/L 0.50
Method: E200.7
Sample 10: MB-120719A Method Blank
Calcium ND mg/L 0.50
Sample 10: LFB-120719A Laboratory Fortified Blank
Calcium 47.6 mg/L 0.50
Sample 10: C12070448-006BMS2 Sample Matrix Spike
Calcium 709 mg/L 0.50
Sample 10: C12070448-006BMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Calcium 727 mg/L 0.50
Method: E200.7
Sample 10: ICV Initial Calibration Verification Standard
Iron 5.04 mg/L 0.030
Sample 10: ICSA Interference Check Sample A
Iron 176 mg/L 0.030
Sample 10: ICSAB Interference Check Sample AB
Iron 174 mg/L 0.030
Method: E200.7
Sample 10: MB-120716A Method Blank
Iron ND mg/L 0.030
Sample 10: LFB-120716A Laboratory Fortified Blank
Iron 0.970 mg/L 0.030
Sample 10: C12070492-001 BMS2 Sample Matrix Spike
Iron 0.865 mg/L 0.030
Sample 10: C12070492-001 BMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Iron 0.887 mg/L 0.030
Qualifiers:
%REC Low Limit High Limit
98 95 105
97 80 120
96 80 120
Run: ICP2-C_120719A
Run: ICP2-C_120719A
95 85 115
Run: ICP2-C 120719A -
85 70 130
Run: ICP2-C _120719A
92 70 130
101 95 105
88 80 120
87 80 120
Run: ICP4-C_120716A
Run: ICP4-C_120716A
97 85 115
Run: ICP4-C 120716A -
85 70 130
Run: ICP4-C 120716A -
87 70 130
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RPO RPOLimit Qual
Analytical Run: ICP2-C_120719A
07/19/12 11 :32
07/19/1212:18
07/19/12 12:22
Batch: R162123
07/19/12 12:42
07/19/12 12:46
07/19/12 17:56
07/19/12 18:01
2.5 20
Analytical Run: ICP4-C_120716A
07/16/12 14:12
07/16/12 14:26
07/16/12 14:30
Batch: R161962
07/16/12 14:34
07/16/12 14:38
07/16/12 15:37
07/16/12 15:41
2.5 20
Page 36 of 54
www.energyJab.com
mlytical ~lIl1f1cB SiIws 1m
' ...... ' .. " '~ele~a, Ml877~412-0711 "Billings, MT 800~735-4489 " Casper, WY 888-235-0515
c_gi!.l~fite, w.~ .86.&"686-"7175 • Rapiq City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
ENERGY
LABORATORIES
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E200.7 Analytical Run: ICP4-C_120718A
Sample 10: ICV 5 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 07/18/1214:12
Calcium 49.9 mg/L 0.50 100 95 105
Iron 5.00 mg/L 0.030 100 95 105
Magnesium 50.1 mg/L 0.50 100 95 105
Potassium 49.4 mg/L 0.50 99 95 105
Sodium 50.4 mg/L 0.50 101 95 105
Sample 10: ICSA 5 Interference Check Sample A 07/18/12 14:26
Calcium 455 mg/L 0.50 91 80 120
Iron 176 mg/L 0.030 88 80 120
Magnesium 517 mg/L 0.50 103 80 120
Potassium -0.0109 mg/L 0.50
Sodium 0.422 mg/L 0.50
Sample 10: ICSAB 5 Interference Check Sample AB 07/18/12 14:30
Calcium 451 mg/L 0.50 90 80 120
Iron 177 mg/L 0.030 88 80 120
Magnesium 514 mg/L 0.50 103 80 120
Potassium -0.0228 mg/L 0.50
Sodium 0.352 mg/L 0.50
Method: E200.7 Batch: R162060
Sample 10: MB-120718A 5 Method Blank Run: ICP4-C_120718A 07/18/12 14:34
Calcium NO mg/L 0.50
Iron NO mg/L 0.030
Magnesium ND mg/L 0.50
Potassium NO mg/L 0.50
Sodium NO mg/L 0.50
Sample 10: LFB-120718A 5 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICP4-C_120718A 07/18/12 14:38
Calcium 48.3 mg/L 0.50 97 85 115
Iron 0.959 mg/L 0.030 95 85 115
Magnesium 47.9 mg/L 0.50 96 85 115
Potassium 48.4 mg/L 0.50 97 85 115
Sodium 48.2 mg/L 0.50 96 85 115
Sample 10: C12070448-010BMS2 5 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICP4-C -120718A 07/18/12 15:34
Calcium 638 mg/L 0.50 80 70 130
Iron 4.58 mg/L 0.030 90 70 130
Magnesium 366 mg/L 0.50 91 70 130
Potassium 229 mg/L 0.50 86 70 130
Sodium 826 mg/L 1.0 75 70 130
Sample 10: C12070448-010BMSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICP4-C_120718A 07/18/12 15:38
Calcium 648 mg/L 0.50 84 70 130 1.5 20
Iron 4.72 mg/L 0.030 93 70 130 2.9 20
Magnesium 373 mg/L 0.50 94 70 130 1.9 20
.-~--~--.-.------------.---.------.------.--.---.---------_._----_._---.---------.. _------------_._-----------_._--------_ .. _---------_._-"-_ .. _--------_ .. _---_._---_._----_._----.--------_._----_._-----"----------_._-------_._----------_._------.-•. _------_._--_._----------------_._-_.--------_._---------_.---_.-
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 37 of 54
·EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
AnalyticilExCll/ltmcll ~ 1952
Helena" MT 877-472-0111 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
_;~ilIette" WY 866 .. $86-1175 • Rapid City, SD' 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C 12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count
Method: E200.7
Result Units
Sample 10: C12070448-010BMSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Potassium 237 mg/L
Sodium 857 mg/L
----------.----------------.-------------------------------
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
0.50
1.0
89
87
Run: ICP4-C _120718A
70 130
70 130
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
3.3
3.6
Batch: R162060
07/18/12 15:38
20
20
Page 38 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
W " -_gyl.b.com ~ •. ··~·H~.n., 1oI1"871-472·D711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888·235·0515
...., ~ ~~/ExCBUBfl~BSincs'852 J-,-l2::~~..1' ~'~iile#e, 'NY 866-&86-7175 • Rapid Cfty, Sf) 888-&72-1225 • College Station,lX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 08/09/12
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012 Work Order: C12070448
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E200.8 Analytical Run: ICPMS4-C_120724A
Sample 10: ICV 15 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 07/24/12 13:32
Arsenic 0.0514 mg/L 0.0010 103 90 110
Cadmium 0.0520 mg/L 0.0010 104 90 110
Chromium 0.0504 mg/L 0.0010 101 90 110
Cobalt 0.0522 mg/L 0.0010 104 90 110
Copper 0.0530 mg/L 0.0010 106 90 110
Lead 0.0503 mg/L 0.0010 101 90 110
Manganese 0.0511 mg/L 0.0010 102 90 110
Molybdenum 0.0501 mg/L 0.0010 100 90 110
Nickel 0.0522 mg/L 0.0010 104 90 110
Selenium 0.0513 mg/L 0.0010 103 90 110
Silver 0.0209 mg/L 0.0010 105 90 110
Thallium 0.0513 mg/L 0.0010 103 90 110
Uranium 0.0506 mg/L 0.00030 101 90 110
Vanadium 0.0505 mg/L 0.0010 101 90 110
Zinc 0.0529 mg/L 0.0010 106 90 110
Method: E200.8 Batch: R162369
Sample 10: LRB 15 Method Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_120724A 07/24/12 14:09
Arsenic NO mg/L 0.0050
Cadmium NO mg/L 0.00050
Chromium NO mg/L 0.020
Cobalt NO mg/L 0.010
Copper NO mg/L 0.010
Lead NO mg/L 0.0010
Manganese NO mg/L 0.010
Molybdenum NO mg/L 0.010
Nickel NO mg/L 0.020
Selenium NO mg/L 0.0050
Silver NO mg/L 0.010
Thallium NO mg/L 0.00050
Uranium NO mg/L 0.00030
Vanadium NO mg/L 0.010
Zinc NO mg/L 0.010
Sample 10: LFB 15 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_120724A 07/24/12 14:13
Arsenic 0.0524 mg/L 0.0010 105 85 115
Cadmium 0.0533 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Chromium 0.0522 mg/L 0.0010 104 85 115
Cobalt 0.0537 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Copper 0.0531 mg/L 0.0010 106 85 115
Lead 0.0511 mg/L 0.0010 102 85 115
Manganese 0.0536 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Molybdenum 0.0520 mg/L 0.0010 104 85 115
Nickel 0.0528 mg/L 0.0010 106 85 115
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 39 of 54
EI'ERGY
LABORATORIES
""" www.ellOlZYlab.com r ' .. K,len.,.MT 817-412-0711 • Billings, MT 808-135-4489· Casper, WY 888-235-8515 .~~ AImlytJt;alExuJIBIWaSinu 1m J.E:".~~ ,~~J~iIf~fte, wy 86S .. 686-7U5 • Rapid Cfty, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count
Method: E200.8
Result Units
Sample 10: LFB
Selenium
15 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Sample 10: C12070448-003BMS
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
0.0531 mg/L
0.0210 mg/L
0.0523 mg/L
0.0510 mg/L
0.0524 mg/L
0.0537 mg/L
15 Sample Matrix Spike
0.0531 mg/L
0.0466 mg/L
0.0524 mg/L
0.0490 mg/L
0.0469
0.0552
0.188
0.0558
0.0486
0.0510
0.0168
0.0526
0.0652
0.0543
0.0450
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Sample 10: C12070448-003BMSO 14 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Arsenic 0.0525 mg/L
Cadmium 0.0457 mg/L
Chromium 0.0523 mg/L
Cobalt 0.0478 mg/L
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
0.0468 mg/L
0.0541 mg/L
0.185 mg/L
0.0548 mg/L
0.0485 mg/L
0.0162 mg/L
0.0515 mg/L
0.0630 mg/L
0.0543 mg/L
0.0447 mg/L
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.0010
0.0010
106
105
105
102
105
107
105
93
105
96
94
110
107
107
96
102
84
105
129
109
89
104
91
105
94
94
108
101
105
95
81
103
125
109
89
Run: ICPMS4-C_120724A
85 115
85 115
85 115
85
85
85
115
115
115
Run: ICPMS4-C_120724A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
Run: ICPMS4-C_120724A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
1.1
2.1
0.2
2.4
0.2
1.9
1.7
1.8
0.3
3.1
2.1
3.5
0.1
0.6
Batch: R162369
07/24/12 14:13
07/25/1207:1 9
07/25/12 07:42
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Page 40 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORAT ORIES
,"" www.energyJab.com
Ana~1 Ex~/SfI&IJ Sines 1,952
Helena, MT871-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800~735-4489 • Casper, WV 888 ... 235-0515
Gi!J~tte; 'Wy, 866-6~6~7175 • Rapid City, SI} 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count
Method: E200.8
Result
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Units RL %REC Low Limit
Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C 12070448
High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Analytical Run: ICPMS4-C_120801A
Sample 10: ICV 17 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 08/01/1210:16
Arsenic 0.0504 mg/L 0.0010 101 90 110
Beryllium 0.0516 mg/L 0.0010 103 90 110
Cadmium 0.0505 mg/L 0.0010 101 90 110
Chromium 0.0484 mg/L 0.0010 97 90 110
Cobalt 0.0514 mg/L 0.0010 103 90 110
Copper 0.0513 mg/L 0.0010 103 90 110
Lead 0.0491 mg/L 0.0010 98 90 110
Manganese 0.0504 mg/L 0.0010 101 90 110
Mercury 0.00512 mg/L 0.0010 102 90 110
Molybdenum 0.0466 mg/L 0.0010 93 90 110
Nickel 0.0507 mg/L 0.0010 101 90 110
Selenium 0.0531 mg/L 0.0010 106 90 110
Silver 0.0206 mg/L 0.0010 103 90 110
Thallium 0.0499 mg/L 0.0010 100 90 110
Uranium 0.0507 mg/L 0.00030 101 90 110
Vanadium 0.0479 mg/L 0.0010 96 90 110
Zinc 0.0518 mg/L 0.0010 104 90 110
Method: E200.8 Batch: R162678
Sample 10: LRB 17 Method Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_120801A 08/01/1210:52
Arsenic NO mg/L 0.0050
Beryllium NO mg/L 0.00050
Cadmium NO mg/L 0.00050
Chromium NO mg/L 0.020
Cobalt NO mg/L 0.010
Copper NO mg/L 0.010
Lead NO mg/L 0.0010
Manganese NO mg/L 0.010
Mercury NO mg/L 0.00050
Molybdenum NO mg/L 0.010
Nickel NO mg/L 0.020
Selenium NO mg/L 0.0050
Silver NO mg/L 0.010
Thallium NO mg/L 0.00050
Uranium NO mg/L 0.00030
Vanadium NO mg/L 0.010
Zinc NO mg/L 0.010
Sample 10: LFB 17 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_120801A 08/01/12 10:56
Arsenic 0.0518 mg/L 0.0010 103 85 115
Beryllium 0.0524 mg/L 0.0010 105 85 115
Cadmium 0.0518 mg/L 0.0010 104 85 115
Chromium 0.0503 mg/L 0.0010 101 85 115
Cobalt 0.0527 mg/L 0.0010 105 85 115
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 41 of 54
EI'ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Ana~1 ExI;8IIBfWIl Sines 1952
,Heiena, MTB77-412-0711 • Billings,. MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
. ~ __ .:.~:¢iIl~tta, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid Cfty, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count
Method: E200.8
Result Units
Sample 10: LFB
Copper
17 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Sample 10: C12070448-008BMS
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
0.0522 mg/L
0.0510 mg/L
0.0524 mg/L
0.00502 mg/L
0.0476 mg/L
0.0519 mg/L
0.0515 mg/L
0.0206 mg/L
0.0520 mg/L
0.0514 mg/L
0.0494 mg/L
0.0544 mg/L
17 Sample Matrix Spike
0.0589 mg/L
0.0508 mg/L
0.0515
0.0560
0.0567
0.0532
0.0574
0.0590
0.00537
0.0554
0.0550
0,135
0.0165
0.0578
0.0692
0.0563
0.0538
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Sample 10: C12070448-008BMSO 17 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Arsenic 0.0573 mg/L
Beryllium 0.0515 mg/L
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
0.0519
0.0544
0.0573
0.0515
0.0580
0.0588
0.00543
0.0563
0.0527
0.135
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
104
102
105
100
95
104
103
103
104
103
99
109
117
102
103
112
112
106
115
118
107
104
108
119
83
115
121
112
107
114
103
104
109
113
103
116
117
109
105
103
118
Run: ICPMS4-C_120801A
85 115
85 115
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
Run: ICPMS4-C_120801A
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
Run: ICPMS4-C_120801A
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
2.7
1.3
0.7
2.8
1.1
3.2
0.9
0.4
1.1
1.6
4.2
0.1
Batch: R162678
08/01/1210:56
08/01/1216:07
08/01/1216:12
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Page 42 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
Ana~/£X~lllNIca Sin~ 1952
.~elel1a. MT877"472-0111 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
_~iU~t:te, WY866~686-7175 • Rapid City, SI) 888-672-1225 • College station, lX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count
Method: E200.8
Result Units
Sample 10: C12070448-008BMSO 17 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Silver 0.0163 mg/L
Thallium 0.0583 mg/L
Uranium 0.0695 mg/L
Vanadium 0.0547 mg/L
Zinc 0.0518 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R162678
Run: ICPMS4-C_120801A 08/01/1216:12
0.0010 81 70 130 1.6 20
0.0010 116 70 130 0.8 20
0.00030 122 70 130 0.5 20
0.0010 109 70 130 2.9 20
0.0010 103 70 130 3.7 20
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 43 of 54
www.energylab.com
Analyth;al Exf;SHIHWIl $inf;g 1952 ENaRGY
LABORATORI ES
~ele'la, tdT 877-472-0111 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
., :GiUef;ts"Wf,S'&&-.G. 86;-7175 .• • Rapid City, Sf) 888-&72-1225 • College Station, 'IX 888-690-2218 ~ ~"~.": ~~",,.' ", ' '-
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E353.2
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method Blank
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N NO mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.56 mg/L
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.85 mg/L
Sample 10: C12070448-003CMS Sample Matrix Spike
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.01 mg/L
Sample 10: C12070448-003CMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.03 mg/L
Sample 10: C12070452-001CMS Sample Matrix Spike
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 7.43 mg/L
Sample 10: C12070452-001CMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 7.38 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R161946
Run: TECHNICON_120716A 07/16/12 11 :07
0.10
Run: TECHNICON_120716A 07/16/12 11 :10
0.10 102 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120716A 07/16/12 11 :12
0.10 94 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120716A 07/16/12 11 :52
0.10 103 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120716A 07/16/1211 :55
0.10 104 90 110 1.0 10
Run: TECHNICON_120716A 07/16/12 12:30
0.20 105 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120716A 07/16/12 12:32
0.20 104 90 110 0.7 10
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 44 of 54
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Allalytit;al £X~8nIJflCB SiIJu 1152
Helena, MT877"472-0711 .. Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
W~$,fj-686 .. 7J75 It Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E900.1
Sample 10: LCS-GA-0547
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: MB-GA-0547
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Laboratory Control Sample
20.9 pCi/L
3 Method Blank
-0.0401
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 0.174
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 0.314
Sample 10: C12070454-007GMS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: C12070454-007GMSO
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Sample Matrix Spike
37.4 pCi/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
38.8 pCi/L
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: G5000W_120717A
101 70 130
Run: G5000W_120717A
Run: G5000W _1 20717 A
92 70 130
Run: G5000W _120717 A
94 70 130
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
3.7
Batch: GA-0547
08/08/1222:25
08/08/12 22:25
U
08/09/12 00:07
08/09/12 00:07
21.6
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Page 45 of 54
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
AnalytlcafExcsllSllCIl Sines 1152
-i) 'Hele~.a, MT877"472 ... 0711 • Billings. MT 800-735-4489-Casper,WV 888 ... 235-051 5 ,jm~!te, WY,.O_6"'_686.n75 " Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 " College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: SW8260B
Sample 10: 071812_LCS_ 4 16 Laboratory Control Sample
Acetone 97 ug/L
Benzene 9.3 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride 8.5 ug/L
Chloroform 9.4 ug/L
Chloromethane 8.9 ug/L
m+p-Xylenes 19 ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone 98 ug/L
Methylene chloride 10 ug/L
Naphthalene 10 ug/L
o-Xylene 10.0 ug/L
Toluene 10 ug/L
Xylenes, Total 29 ug/L
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: T 0luene-d8
Sample 10: 071812_MBLK_6 16 Method Blank
Acetone NO ug/L
Benzene NO ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L
Chloroform NO ug/L
Chloromethane NO ug/L
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L
Methylene chloride NO ug/L
Naphthalene NO ug/L
o-Xylene NO ug/L
Toluene NO ug/L
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: C12070337-004AMS 16 Sample Matrix Spike
Acetone 1800 ug/L
Benzene 170 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride 160 ug/L
Chloroform 170 ug/L
Chloromethane 160 ug/L
m+p-Xylenes 330 ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone 1800 ug/L
Methylene chloride 180 ug/L
Naphthalene 160 ug/L
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R 162082
Run: SATURNCA_120718C 07/18/12 11 :07
20 97 70 130
1.0 93 70 130
1.0 85 70 130
1.0 94 70 130
1.0 89 70 130
1.0 94 70 130
20 98 70 130
1.0 101 70 130
1.0 102 70 130
1.0 100 70 130
1.0 101 70 130
1.0 96 70 130
1.0 106 80 120
1.0 86 70 130
1.0 87 80 130
1.0 104 80 120
Run: SATURNCA_120718C 07/18/12 12:20
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 98 80 120
1.0 88 70 130
1.0 79 80 120 S
1.0 96 80 120
Run: SATURNCA_120718C 07/18/12 18:50
200 88 70 130
10 87 70 130
10 81 70 130
10 84 70 130
10 80 70 130
10 82 70 130
200 90 70 130
10 90 70 130
10 80 70 130
----."------_._-_._-----_._-----------------------._------_._._--_._-_ .. _---_._--------_._--------------------... _---.".-----------------_._------.----.. _--------_.---------------------"----------------_ .. _------_._----_. __ ._---._---_._--_ .. _-------------_._----_._-_._--_._--_._._-_._-----------_._-------------_._------_._---
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Page 46 of 54
EI'-ERGY
LABORATORI ES
www.energylab.com
AnatyticalExcsHsncll ~ 1952
Hel~!1a, MT87l·472-0711 • Billings. MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
. i".J;'nt~tt~r WY.B,6S ... j86"7175 • Ra()ip City, SI) 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C 12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count
Method: SW8260B
Result Units
Sample 10: C12070337-004AMS
o-Xylene
16 Sample Matrix Spike
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: C12070337-004AMSO
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
180 ug/L
170 ug/L
500 ug/L
16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
2100 ug/L
190 ug/L
200 ug/L
190 ug/L
190 ug/L
380 ug/L
1900 ug/L
210 ug/L
200 ug/L
190 ug/L
180 ug/L
570 ug/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: SATURNCA_120718C
10 88 70 130
10 86 70 130
10 84 70 130
1.0 92 80 120
1.0 88 70 130
1.0 82 80 120
1.0 98 80 120
Run: SA TU RNCA_120718C
200 105 70 130
10 94 70 130
10 98 70 130
10 95 70 130
10 93 70 130
10 95 70 130
200 97 70 130
10 106 70 130
10 102 70 130
10 96 70 130
10 88 70 130
10 96 70 130
1.0 105 80 120
1.0 94 70 130
1.0 100 80 120
1.0 90 80 120
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
R -RPD exceeds advisory limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R162082
07/18/1218:50
07/18/12 19:26
18 20
7.5 20
19 20
12 20
14 20
15 20
7.7 20
16 20
25 20 R
8.2 20
2.3 20
13 20
0.0 10
0.0 10
0.0 10
0.0 10
Page 47 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical !xCIII/snell SiIlcs 1.152
Helen~, :MTS17:..412-0111 .. Billings. MT 800-735-4489 " Casper, WY 888-235-0515
.=, ,,~iJl~ti:e', WY,8'$' ... 86~7n5 • Rapi!f Cfty, Sf) 888-672-1225 .. College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count
Method: SW8260B
Result Units
Sample 10: C12070448-009EMS
Acetone
16 Sample Matrix Spike
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
1400 ug/L
160 ug/L
150 ug/L
160
140
320
1600
170
170
160
160
480
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Sample 10: C12070448-009EMSO 16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Acetone 1600 ug/L
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chlorom ethane
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: T oluene-d8
Sample 10: 071912_LCS_7
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
180
170
180
180
350
1800
190
190
180
180
540
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
16 Laboratory Control Sample
92 ug/L
8.8 ug/L
8.2 ug/L
8.5 ug/L
8.2
18
91
9.4
10
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
200
10
10
10
10
10
200
10
10
10
10
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
200
10
10
10
10
10
200
10
10
10
10
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
72
79
75
78
71
80
82
84
86
82
78
80
98
87
85
95
82
90
84
92
88
89
89
96
94
92
90
90
92
87
88
93
92
88
82
85
82
91
91
94
101
Run: SATURNCA_120719A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
80
70
80
80
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
120
130
120
120
Run : SATURNCA_120719A
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
80
70
80
80
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
120
130
120
120
Run: SATURNCA_120719A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
130
130
130
130
130
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
R -RPD exceeds advisory limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
12
13
12
16
21
10
7.9
13
9.3
12
14
11
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Batch: R162128
07/19/12 19:19
07/19/12 19:56
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
10
10
10
10
R
07/19/12 13:33
Page 48 of 54
EI'.ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyiab.com
ANIyticaI ExCIIHBfWII SiJ1u 1952
ffelell3, Mt 877 .. 412-0711 • Billings, MY 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515 ,jdiile~e:rW~_a6$-686~7n5 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count
Method: SW8260B
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Result Units RL %REC Low Limit
Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C 12070448
High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R162128
Sample 10: 071912_LCS_7 16 Laboratory Control Sample Run: SATURNCA_120719A 07/19/12 13:33
o-Xylene 9.3 ug/L 1.0 93 70 130
Toluene 9.0 ug/L 1.0 90 70 130
Xylenes, Total 27 ug/L 1.0 92 70 130
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 104 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 88 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 88 80 130
Surr: T oluene-d8 1.0 101 80 120
Sample 10: 071912_MBLK_9 16 Method Blank Run: SATURNCA_120719A 07/19/12 14:47
Acetone NO ug/L 20
Benzene NO ug/L 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L 1.0
Chloroform NO ug/L 1.0
Chloromethane NO ug/L 1.0
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L 1.0
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L 20
Methylene chloride NO ug/L 1.0
Naphthalene NO ug/L 1.0
o-Xylene NO ug/L 1.0
Toluene NO ug/L 1.0
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L 1.0
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 99 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 86 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 81 80 120
Surr: T oluene-d8 1.0 98 80 120
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 49 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORI ES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExQlllsncB $IRes 7952
Hefena, MT'B77-472-0711 • BUlings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, W'f 888-235-0515
. ",-.~illette, Wy866~6B6 .. 7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count
Method: SW8260B
Result Units
Sample 10: C12070468-001 EMS
Acetone
16 Sample Matrix Spike
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
1400 ug/L
180 ug/L
170 ug/L
180 ug/L
180 ug/L
380 ug/L
1600 ug/L
180
190
190
180
580
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Sample 10: C12070468-001 EMSO 16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Acetone 1400 ug/L
Benzene 160 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride 170 ug/L
Chloroform
Chloromethane
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: 072312_LCS_4
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
160
180
340
1500
170
170
170
170
510
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
16 Laboratory Control Sample
91 ug/L
8.6 ug/L
7.9 ug/L
8.4 ug/L
8.9 ug/L
17 ug/L
97 ug/L
9.5 ug/L
9.2 ug/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
200
10
10
10
10
10
200
10
10
10
10
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
200
10
10
10
10
10
200
10
10
10
10
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
69
91
84
90
92
96
79
92
93
96
88
96
98
88
91
96
68
82
83
80
91
85
73
87
86
86
83
85
98
87
86
95
91
86
79
84
89
83
97
95
92
Run: SATURNCA_120723B
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
80
70
80
80
130
130
130
130
130
120
130
120
120
Run: SATURNCA_120723B
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
80
70
80
80
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
120
130
120
120
. Run: SATURNCA_120723B
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
1.7
11
1.0
12
1.3
12
7.9
5.4
8.0
11
6.1
12
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Batch: R162289
07/23/1221 :14
S
07/23/1221 :50
20 S
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
10
10
10
10
07/23/12 13:08
Page 50 of 54
E~RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
Ana~1 ExeslJBflCB Sines '952
~elena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
-.~illeft:~, Wy _866-~86-1l75 • Rapid Ctty, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, lX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 08/10/12
Report Date: 08/09/12
Work Order: C12070448
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count
Method: SW8260B
Result Units
Sample 10: 072312_LCS_ 4 16 Laboratory Control Sample
o-Xylene 8.7 ug/L
Toluene 8.4 ug/L
Xylenes, Total 25 ug/L
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane .
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: 072312_MBLK_6 16 Method Blank
Acetone NO ug/L
Benzene NO ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L
Chloroform NO ug/L
Chloromethane NO ug/L
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L
Methylene chloride NO ug/L
Naphthalene NO ug/L
o-Xylene NO ug/L
Toluene NO ug/L
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MOC - Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R 162289
Run: SATURNCA_120723B 07/23/12 13:08
1.0 87 70 130
1.0 84 70 130
1.0 85 70 130
1.0 100 80 120
1.0 88 70 130
1.0 82 80 130
1.0 95 80 120
Run: SATURNCA_ 120723B 07/23/12 14:21
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 94 80 120
1.0 84 70 130
1.0 78 80 120 S
1.0 94 80 120
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Page 51 of 54
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExuIIBllCf Sines 1952
Helena,MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
>" :~iIIe~~,wy 86&~686~7175 • Rapid City, Si1888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
Standard Reporting Procedures
Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual
Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time.
Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected, data units are typically noted as -dry.
For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, a" samples are dried and ground prior to sample analysis.
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
Login completed by: Kathryn (Kate) L. Miller
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 7/18/2012
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
A" samples received within holding time?
(Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters
such as pH, DO, Res CI, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.)
ContainerlT emp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes D
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
2.0"C On Ice
Yes 0
Yes 0
C12070448
Date Received: 7/13/2012
Received by: dw
Carrier FedEx
name:
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
Not Present D
Not Present D
Not Present 0
No VOA vials submitted D
Not Applicable D
Page 52 of 54
EN:RGY mJ Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record page~of~
--------,--~ ~ -------------~ -------~ ----
Company Name: D . M;(1 c:,-S Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. Sample Origin EPNState Compliance:
, e"I~0(l ~ra o.v..o.rter (!""rC'~nJ. w{"~h:,,r :2.0 i.1.. State: lXT" Yes ~ No 0
Report Mail Address: Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print) p~ BC"X 8C1 ~'\C\'t1,1, ¥lc.\ \.-\, 84511 Cr-C\(1'" i" Pc\ll'Y)er Y3S b7 g :2.-2. 2.! ·-r:;:~t1c:.r He it't;\aj
Invoice Addre~: Invoice Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
_S~'fV)e O('.\I'c.:\ ·.,-v.r \( .. .J .... !) I.."~ ~ ,) ~ /~ 21:21
Special Report/Formats: $: ~[S )7~O@ [llirn@llD~§[Q) .. Contact ELI prior to ~:ed~ £ Cl .... RUSH sample submittal
~o (/)J!. for charges and Cooler"1b(s):
<lJ -0-.... j::' R scheduling -See C-Ij~ c:al=OI.s 0 ~ '-> 0 >-ro W Instruction Page o OW 0 EDD/EDT(Electronic Data) ~C/)~ ~ 3: 0 J: "C o POTWIWWTP Format:
o$:= ro 0) T U c: Comments: ReeeiptTemp
U «~I.Q ~ :::J U 1..0 ~ <: 0 °c o State: 0 LEVEL IV '0 ,-£01 c ~ ~ "-Qj~ C'L: -~ I-ea -~ o..rol,£ 0 '..) c: D Other: 0 NELAC ~ l.-On Ice: (Y')N E~ro I r-:::J
;:, Q,).!:::!i> 3; ~ ~ l-S ZCi.<X:1 aro LU "E Custody Seal ~ ~ >1 W ro On Bottle N
'}) ~ 5 en '0 On Cooler N C/) .. ~ c ea oJ .~ US H Intact y
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection "5 \.., \-
MATRIX () ~ 'r~ Signature y
(Name, Location, Interval, etc.) Date Time Match
1
MVJ-:lq_OlI0~Cl&.l. 1hc/1A 134~ )-w '/.. I~
2,\\W" 3:l_C70'1.20\;1... 7/:l, II')... \'3'5 )·-w )( I~
3 t .. ~ Vv -11-07 \ I ~c -il 7/'1/)~ 1;2.10 b··~vJ )( \9J Innn
4 7!1J/L'l.. 123:=, b'~VV )( ~ /vl W -1L.i _ t.71 , ~O i.l.
5 l5 7/)C/11.. "W )( ~
/,\vJ-';I __ C71C~GI1. \.2"1.0 ~-~
6 fv'W -:t~~.C711 '1.012 7/i1/L~ CC1S) b-vJ 'X ~
7 /~l y-J-30-(;7 iC'2C '.l... -, ,. ~/~:l... 1100 br-W )( I~' r71)1di'iK i.' Ie I·
8/';1 vJ -3" _C70t]'J4)i;l. 7/1h~ l ·3:.~S b--W X I~
9 /v\VV-35_C7IC~C,~ 1,/lC/12 )410 ~--w X ~ I
1~1\i1 W -3G:" (",11;2.0 \ ~ 7/) "/l~ 0'1/5 b-W IX I~ I
Custody Relinquished b~rint): DatelTime: Signature: Received by (print): DatelTime: Signa ure: rr:,t)t\~.r 'wl1:(\,,~ 7/)2/2(;\2 Cr,(,.--I\ :)"'IlN~ ,L/.;/d.:,L-Record RelinqUished by (print): 0 DatelTime: Signature: ... Received by (print): DatefTime: Signature:
MUST be
Signed Il~ Dy L3D07Jn DatelTlme: I ~ ':) 'ne~D Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal: ( , 1 .. ~~-...~ ~-J -:/
In certain circumstances. samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be sUbcontract~~~ther certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this Dossibilitv. All sub-contract data will learlv notated on your analvtical report.
\Ii<>it ru,r ,.,on C!it.:.::.t ".IIA/W pnprovl::th.com for additional information. downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
EI\ERGY ~'"
ua.fI Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record Page~of Q..,
----~---... ----... ----, ... -.. ---.. .....-.......... --..... -----.. ---..... ------... , Company Name: Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. Sample Origin EPA/State Compliance:
State: Yes 0 No 0
Report Mail Address: ./ Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print) ~<Ar he . (.\S PCildp J
Invoice Address: Invoice Contact & Phone: "J Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
Special Report/Formats: ~ &~~ '\1@U® oo(g@QJJ~rn[Q) • Contact ELI prior to sF:;;;,~£ 0 .... RUSH sample submittal ~OCl)~ ~ for charges and CoolerlD(s):
~m~OI <i> ~ 0 R scheduling -See GI;~ ._> 0 >.10 W t-I nstruction Page Dow D EDD/EDT(Electronic Data) ~en~ ms: :r: --03:= ~ 0) '0 Receipt Temp DpOTWIWWTP Format: u 0oe: ~ U c: Comments: :l U "'.0 ...... <enl.-32 \} « e °c o State: o LEVEL IV o .... COI c •• (I) c:--r-m .... 8:ro.2 0 c o Other: o NELAC ~~Iro I ~ ~ :J On Ice: (SN ~ (I).:: a; ~ t-5 zo.<Ig>Cl '#. W "E Custody Seat ~ ~ >1 W m On Bottle N -C en .;,) (/) C On Cooler Y N
~ .m H Intact Y N G (J)
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection MATRIX Signature Y N
(Name, Location, Interval, etc.) Date Time Match
1
Jv\W-~,_07H 10".2 7 III /J.2.. 095i f --wW )( ~
2~\O 'F,)~t\k {Dlt2;. ·~/d/·~ ( t · I .~ I~
3 I ~ Ii 1lQ) ·1?-mn' .Jt\ flnn
4 y '-' I~
,~
5 I~ ~
6 ~
7 ~(~l1D7d1"tk I
8 ~ I 0)
9 l~ I
10 1t::JJ I
Custody Relinquished by \t~~ . J. OatelTime: Signature: d.~ Received by (print): DatelTime: Signature:
'~N,\~ ,i L dl.\ ~ ·7/r1./'2.0 U V ~C() :-\ JUf4~~ r-l' Record Relinquished by (print): ...,j DatelTime: "Signature: J Received by (print): DatelTime: Signature:
MUST be
Signed ~e~v;a :Y,L37r(f; , Uatefllme: ,_ ,/~ t} ~J"rJre2-,< Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal: .... ..... --/ . .. ---
\li",i ..... , ... u /Qh cito :::It www A",,'!mvl~h.c()m for additional information. downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
r -
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical Excsllsm:s Sim;g 1952
Helena, MT 877~472~0711 • Billings, MT 800 .. 735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~il/~ffe,WY US .. &B6 .. 7175 • Rapid City, SI} 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888 ... 690-2218
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
August 14, 2012
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C12070741 Quote 10: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 14 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 7/20/2012 for
analysis.
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C12070741-001 MW-02_07162012 07/16/12 12:45 07/20/12 Aqueous Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
C 12070741-002 MW-03_07182012 07/18/129:55 07/20/12 Aqueous Fluoride
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
C 12070741-003 MW-03A_07192012 07/19/127:00 07/20/12 Aqueous E300.0 Anions
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved
C 12070741-004 MW-05_07162012 07/16/12 14:55 07/20/12 Aqueous Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
C 12070741-005 MW-12_07172012 07/17/12 9:40 07/20/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12070741-006 MW-15_07172012 07/17/1210:50 07/20/12 Aqueous Metals by ICP, Dissolved
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
C 12070741-007 MW-18_07182012 07/18/12 13:15 07/20/12 Aqueous E300.0 Anions
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved
C 12070741-008 MW-19_07192012 07/19/128:00 07/20/12 Aqueous Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
C 12070741-009 MW-70_07182012 07/18/129:55 07/20/12 Aqueous Fluoride
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
C12070741-010 MW-23_07172012 07/17/127:32 07/20/12 Aqueous Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
C12070741-011 MW-24_07182012 07/18/126:30 07/20/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12070741-012 MW-27 _07162012 07/16/12 11 :15 07/20/12 Aqueous E300.0 Anions
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
C12070741-013 MW-28_07162012 07/16/12 10:35 07/20/12 Aqueous E300.0 Anions
C12070741-014 Temp Blank 07/19/12 0:00 07/20/12 Aqueous Temperature
------------------------------._----_._---------------------------------------------------------------
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. The analyses presented in this report were
performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601, unless otherwise noted.
Radiochemistry analyses were performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2325 Kerzell Lane, Casper, WY 82601 ,
unless ot~erwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical
Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By: cS¥~D LJ~~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2012.08.1412:04:16 -06:00
Page 1 of 27
I
www.energylab.com H.elena, MT 877 .. 472 .. 0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Analytical Excsllsncs Sines 1952 so 888-672-1225 • IX 888-690-2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012 Report Date: 08/14/12
Sample Delivery Group: C12070741 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 40C (±2OC)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SD
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001, Radiochemical WY200002; Utah: WY00002; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C836
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 27
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExesllsncB Sines 1952
Helena, MT877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WV 888-235-0515
,~inette, ~y 866.;686-7175 • Rapid CIty, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 08/14/12
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012 Work Order: C12070741
Analyte Count Result Units R.L %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: A2540 C Batch: TDS120723A
Sample 10: MB-1_120723A Method Blank Run: BAL-1_120723A 07/23/1208:22
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C NO mg/L 10
Sample 10: LCS-2_120723A Laboratory Control Sample Run: BAL-1_120723A 07/23/1208:22
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 1100 mg/L 10 99 90 110
Sample 10: C12070741-003A OUP Sample Duplicate Run: BAL-1 120723A 07/23/12 09:20
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 5880 mg/L 10 2.7 5
Sample 10: C12070741-007A MS Sample Matrix Spike Run: BAL -1_120723A 07/23/1209:20
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 7300 mg/L 10 102 90 110
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 17 of 27
EN:RGY
L ABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExCSUsnCB Sines 1952
Helen~, MT 877 .. 472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
_~illette, 'NY 86&-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-F C
Sample 10: MBLK
Fluoride
Sample 10: LCS-6892
Fluoride
Sample 10: C12070726-001 AMS
Fluoride
Sample 10: C12070726-001 AMSO
Fluoride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
NO mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
1.89 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
6.44 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
6.56 mg/L
Report Date:
Work Order:
RL O/OREC Low Limit High Limit RPO
Run: MANTECH_120723A
0.10
Run: MANTECH_120723A
0.10 92 90 110
Run: MANTECH 120723A -
0.10 98 80 120
Run: MANTECH_120723A
0.10 104 80 120 1.8
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
08/14/12
C12070741
RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R 162238
07/23/1208:31
07/23/1208:35
07/23/12 12:12
07/23/12 12:16
10
Page 18 of 27
EI'ERGY www.energylab.com
Analytical ExCl1//sn&B Sinu 1952
" " ,}Ie!ena, Mr'811~472-0711 • Bming~, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
,9.fn~ff¢l' Wv866"Q86-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888 .. 690-2218 LABORATORIES
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Report Date: 08/14/12
Work Order: C12070741
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Method: E200.7
Sample 10: ICV
Iron
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
Sample 10: ICSA
Iron
Sample 10: ICSAB
Iron
Method: E200.7
Sample 10: MB-120723A
Iron
Sample 10: LFB-120723A
Iron
Sample 10: C12070662-001 BMS2
Iron
Sample 10: C12070662-001 BMSO
Iron
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
5.15 mg/L
Interference Check Sample A
185 mg/L
Interference Check Sample AB
185 mg/L
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Laboratory Fortified Blank
0.906 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
46.1 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
46.8 mg/L
0.030 103 95 105
0.030 93 80 120
0.030 93 80 120
Run: ICP2-C_120723A
0.030
Run: ICP2-C_120723A
0.030 90 85 115
Run: ICP2-C_120723A
0.064 90 70 130
Run: ICP2-C_120723A
0.064 92 70 130
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
Analytical Run: ICP2-C_120723A
07/23/12 11 :35
07/23/12 12:15
07/23/12 12:19
Batch: R162266
07/23/12 12:39
07/23/12 12:43
07/23/12 16:45
07/23/12 16:49
1.6 20
Page 19 of 27
E~RGY www.energylab.com , 'Helena, Mt 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
LABORATORIES Analytical ExC8lJSflCB Sines 1952 :Giile,ttslWY 8&6~686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Report Date: 08/14/12
Work Order: C 12070741
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: ICV
Cadmium
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB
Cadmium
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Sample 10: LFB
Cadmium
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Sample 10: C12070456-007CMS4
Cadmium
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Sample 10: C12070456-007CMSO
Cadmium
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: ICV
Thallium
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB
Thallium
Sample 10: LFB
Thallium
Sample 10: C12070971-006CMS4
Thallium
Sample 10: C12070971-006CMSO
Thallium
Qualifiers:
4 Initial Calibration Verification Standard
4
4
4
0.0519 mg/L 0.0010
0.0513 mg/L
0.0513 mg/L
0.0517 mg/L
Method Blank
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
Laboratory Fortified Blank
0.0522 mg/L
0.0534 mg/L
0.0520 mg/L
0.0520 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
0.0470 mg/L
0.0550 mg/L
0.0572 mg/L
0.0706 mg/L
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.00050
0.0050
0.00050
0.00030
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.0010
0.0010
0.00050
0.00030
4 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
0.0449 mg/L 0.0010
0.0507 mg/L 0.0010
0.0553 mg/L 0.00050
0.0685 mg/L 0.00030
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
0.0514 mg/L 0.0010
Method Blank
ND mg/L 0.00050
Laboratory Fortified Blank
0.0514 mg/L 0.0010
Sample Matrix Spike
0.0531 mg/L 0.00050
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
0.0524 mg/L 0.00050
104
103
103
103
104
107
104
104
94
110
114
119
90
101
111
115
103
103
106
Analytical Run: ICPMS4-C_120805A
90 110
90 110
90 110
90 110
Run: ICPMS4-C_120805A
Run: ICPMS4-C_120805A
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
Run: ICPMS4-C 120805A -
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_120805A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
4.5
8.1
3.3
3.0
08/05/12 00:45
Batch: R 162835
08/05/12 01 :20
08/05/12 01 :25
08/05/12 14:53
08/05/1214:57
20
20
20
20
Analytical Run: ICPMS4-C_120806A
08/06/12 11 :36
90 110
Run: ICPMS4-C_120806A
Run: ICPMS4-C_120806A
85 115
Run: ICPMS4-C_120806A
70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_120806A
Batch: R 162953
08/06/12 12:17
08/06/12 12:21
08/07/12 14:58
105 70 130 1.3
08/07/12 15:02
20
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 20 of 27
EN:RGY www.energylab.com Helena, Mt 877-472-071 t • Billings, MT 800 .. 735~44B9 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
billetie,!NY 866 .. 686-7115 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218 LABORATORIES Analytical ExcsIJSfI&1I Sines 1952
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Report Date: 08/14/12
Work Order: C12070741
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: ICV
Manganese
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB
Manganese
Sample 10: LFB
Manganese
Sample 10: C12080099-027BMS4
Manganese
Sample 10: C12080099-027BMSO
Manganese
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: ICV
Selenium
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB
Selenium
Sample 10: LFB
Selenium
Sample 10: C12070781-001 BMS4
Selenium
Sample 10: C12070781-001 BMSO
Selenium
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
0.0506 mg/L 0.0010
Method Blank
NO mg/L 0.0010
Laboratory Fortified Blank
0.0529 mg/L 0.0010
Sample Matrix Spike
0.446 mg/L 0.0010
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
0.446 mg/L 0.0010
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
0.0524 mg/L 0.0010
Method Blank
NO mg/L 0.0050
Laboratory Fortified Blank
0.0535 mg/L 0.0010
Sample Matrix Spike
0.0502 mg/L 0.0010
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
0.0516 mg/L 0.0010
101
Analytical Run: ICPMS4-C_120809A
08/09/12 10:18
90 110
Run: ICPMS4-C_1 20809A
Run: ICPMS4-C_120809A
Batch: R1631 00
08/09/12 10:53
08/09/12 10:58
106 85 115
Run: ICPMS4-C_120809A
70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_120809A
70 130 0.0
08/10/1203:42
A
08/10/1203:46
20 A
Analytical Run: ICPMS4-C_120813A
08/13/12 11 :46
105 90 110
Run: ICPMS4-C_1 20813A
Run: ICPMS4-C_120813A
107 85 115
Run: ICPMS4-C_120813A
100 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_120813A
103 70 130 2.7
Batch: R163189
08/13/12 12:21
08/13/12 12:26
08/13/12 12:39
08/13/12 12:44
20
------------------------------------------------------
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
A -The analyte level was greater than four times the spike level. In
accordance with the method % recovery is not calculated.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 21 of 27
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical Excslhmcil Sim:8 1952
Helena, MlB77-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
... ~iUefte, WY 8&&-.86-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, lX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Report Date: 08/14/12
Work Order: C12070741
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Method: E300.0
Sample 10: ICV-072S1 2-10
Chloride
Sulfate
Method: E300.0
Sample 10: ICB-072S1 2-11
Chloride
Sulfate
Sample 10: LFB-072S12-13
Chloride
Sulfate
Sample 10 : LFBO-072S12-1 4
Chloride
Sulfate
Sample 10: C12070713-01 3AMS
Chloride
Sulfate
Sample 10: C1207071 3-013AMSO
Chloride
Sulfate
Method: E300.0
Sample 10 : ICV-072712-10
Chloride
Method: E300.0
Sample 10 : ICB-07271 2-11
Chloride
Sample 10: LFB-072712-12
Chloride
Sample 10: C12070800-002AMS
Chloride
Sample 10: C12070800-002AMSO
Chloride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
2
2
2
2
2
2
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
9.85 mg/L 1.0 98 90 110
40.3 mg/L 1.0 101 90 110
Method Blank Run: IC1-C_120725A
ND mg/L 1.0
ND mg/L 20
Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: IC1-C_120725A
9.77 mg/L 1.0 98 90 110
40.1 mg/L 1.0 100 90 110
Laboratory Fortified Blank Duplicate Run: IC1-C -120725A
9.92 mg/L 1.0 99 90 110
40.9 mg/L 1.0 102 90 110
Sample Matrix Spike Run: IC1-C -120725A
239 mg/L 4.2 98 90 110
3220 mg/L 17 104 90 110
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: IC1 -C -120725A
241 mg/L 4.2 99 90 110
3210 mg/L 17 102 90 110
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
9.04 mg/L 1.0 90 90 110
Method Blank Run: IC1-C_120727A
ND mg/L 1.0
Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: IC1-C_120727A
9.08 mg/L 1.0 91 90 110
Sample Matrix Spike Run: IC1-C -120727A
389 mg/L 2.1 97 90 110
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: IC1-C_120727A
382 mg/L 2.1 91 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
Analytical Run: IC1-C_120725A
07/25/12 15:04
Batch: R 162404
07/25/12 15:22
07/25/12 15:57
07/25/12 16:14
07/25/1220:53
07/25/1221 :10
1.1 10
0.4 10
Analytical Run: IC1-C_120727A
07/27/12 10:32
Batch: R162492
07/27/12 10:49
07/27/12 11 :07
07/27/12 12:16
07/27/12 12:34
1.7 10
Page 22 of 27
EI'ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExCS/JsnCfI SinCJl1952
~elena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
. ,~illeti:e,wy_866-6B6-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 08/14/12
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012 Work Order: C12070741
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E353.2 Batch: R162361
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method Blank Run: TECHNICON_120725A 07/25/12 11 :34
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N NO mg/L 0.20
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample Run: TECHNICON_120725A 07/25/12 11 :37
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.49 mg/L 0.10 100 90 110
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: TECHNICON_120725A 07/25/12 11 :39
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.12 mg/L 0.10 108 90 110
Sample 10: C12070741-012CMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: TECHNICON_120725A 07/25/12 14:44
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 17.2 mg/L 0.50 108 90 110
Sample 10: C12070741-012CMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TECHNICON_120725A 07/25/12 14:47
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 17.2 mg/L 0.50 108 90 110 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 23 of 27
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsHsnCB Sines 1952
Helena, MT 877-472-071 t • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WV 888-235-0515
. =.~ 5: ~ .~iIlette, wy 86&-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E900.1
Sample 10: LCS-GA-0551
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: MB-GA-0551
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Laboratory Control Sample
22.4 pC ilL
3 Method 81ank
0.126
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 0.144
pC ilL
pC ilL
pC ilL Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 0.212
Sample 10: C12070710-006GMS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: C12070710-006GMSO
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Sample Matrix Spike
42.0 pC ilL
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
44.7 pC ilL
Report Date: 08/14/12
Work Order: C12070741
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Run: 8ERTHOLD 770-2_1207238
109 70 130
Run: 8ERTHOLD 770-2_1207238
Run: 8ERTHOLD 770-2_1207238
100 70 130
Run: 8ERTHOLD 770-2_1207238
104 70 130 6.1
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
8atch: GA-0558
08/01/1209:30
08/01/1209:30
U
08/01/1213:12
08/01/1213:12
19.2
Page 24 of 27
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
~..www.energylab.com
~ Allllyf:lcal ExcBJlsoCliSincs 1952
Heiena, MT 877-472-071 t • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~ilIe~e1 Wy'866-686-71l5 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
Standard Reporting Procedures
Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual
Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time.
Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected, data units are typically noted as -dry.
For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried and ground prior to sample analysis.
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Den ison Mines USA Corp
Login completed by: Corinne Wagner
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 7/24/2012
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
(Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters
such as pH, DO, Res CI, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.)
ContainerlT emp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes D
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
1.6OC On Ice
Yes D
Yes [{1
C12070741
Date Received: 7/20/2012
Received by: th
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
Carrier FedEx
name:
Not Present D
Not Present D
Not Present [{1
No VOA vials submitted [{1
Not Applicable D
Page 25 of 27
"U Q) o ct>
I\)
(j)
o -I\)
-.....J
EI\ERGY ~,'-,~ ~ Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record Page --L-of ~
Company Name: '0"'" jJ.: ,,~S e.nI.S()ft
Report Mail Address: Po 130)(' gOq
B\OJ1d.;~ Ul gyS}\
I nvoice Address:
SC\m£
Special Report/Formats:
DoW D EDD/EDT(Electronic Data) o POTWNVWTP Format:. ___ _ o State: D LEVEL IV o Other: ----D NELAC
2
----
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
(Name, Location, Interval, etc.)
Mw-0:1._0-' \b2.0 \:1.
MW-03_ (7)8;t61:2,.
3MvJ"03A_01}q~ot~
4 N.W-OS_QJ16201~
5 MW -12... 67 \7.20 1~
6MW -l5 _ 07 \7 :;;"0 \2
7 MW"'I~-071~~\~
8M W-\Q ... Ol ~~O\~
9rJ\W-iD_Cl}g2D l:l..
12...........L. fO\n-""'(7
Custody Relinquished b¥ (prin:):
R d -r:. \ ecor Relinquished by (print):
Collection
Date
__ 7/](.JJ~
7/IKJj~
Collection
Time
12.l.{~
o't~S
"7/ r'\ Ie.. I 6700
7lJiJl~ I l'1SS
1/17/1':2... loq'10
11171 r:L 110'!)O
1711YJbl. 1135
tJiB!J2. 10lSOO
1711&LJ::t I 095S
PLEASE PRI NT (Provide as much information as possible.)
Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. I Sample Origin
:./~ QWJ-rt~r &ro,""",tl WO-+t..r 2.0 l:t State: u,..,-
EPA/State Compliance:
Yes iii No 0
Contact Name: Phone/Fax:
Cre-.. ff' \ f\ 'P ("'Mtr \.r:~.S b'" () ::D.:::2.1
InVOice Contact & Phone:
D",-v~~ ~~ Y3S ~7~ ZZ2.\
~ &rm&[b W@O@ OO[g®M§@l?@:@ o L... ~O(J)~
2;!cc;GOI Q5 ._> 0 >-m Bt'"Cfl ro:> C:"'''en (J):> O~= ~ 0> U<~I.Q·= '0 ~CCI-E ~ Q,i-S c: 'C ~~I·go E~> ro I
;:, <I,).!:: 1i:) s: Za.<tl~a ~ >1
(/)
MATRIX
\ .. w
~-vJ
2-W
I-wi
l-W
l-W'
~-w
\-vv
;L.-vJ
ti
I~ 1/\
Xl 1'X1~ -r-----r-r I '/.
x
)<
X 11< 1 I IX x
~ l-x I'
Received by (print):
Received by (print):
[
"0 c: :::l e ro c: \,., :::l I-
"E ro "0 c t5
Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
~rlll~r Ho" ... A~'f
Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order: ..
R
u
5
H
DatefTime:
DatefTime:
Contact ELI prior to
RUSH sample submittal
for charges and
scheduling -See
Instruction Page
Comments:
cl~~-d-'
ReceiptT ernp
l,fo °c
On Ice: (j) N
Custody Seal
On Bottle Y N
On Cooler
Intact
Signature
Match
I~ I~
~ ~ I'=' ,~
tgs;
(9)
~ ~ ~ 51 I~
v):
( V N .....,
l~o74.{
Signafure:
Signature:
MUSTbe~------------------------------~~~~~~ __ ~~ __ ~ ____ ~~ ______ ~
Signed Sample Dispo~ Return to Client: Lab Disposal:
In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to othet. certkied laboratories in order to co~plete the analysis requested,
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data will be clearl~ated on your analytical report.
\/idt nllr WAh ~itA::Jt www.eneravlab.com for additional information. downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
"'U
Ol :c (1)
I\.)
-.....I
o -I\.)
-.....I
EI\ERGY
, . .. --... _--m2 Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record Page 2 Of~
---... -...... ,. ------... __ ••.... _ ..... __ ._ .. ---.... _ ......... _ • ....r.,
Company Name: Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. Sample Origin EPA/State Compliance:
/ State: Yes 0 No 0
Report Mail Address: ~ Contact Name: 0-Shon~~ Elnail: Sampler: (Please Print)
~ rf\~ /"\ .c::>
Invoice Address: ~ Invoice Contact & Phone: CA.tj"-" P rchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
Special Report/Formats: &JKJ&[b \'7@O® OOrn®(1Drn®l:rrnrID .. Contact ELI prior to Shipped by:
3: RUSH sample submittal 0 (i) for charges and Cooler 10(s): ~o~£ ~ R c co,-=Ol Q) Cl scheduling -See ._> 0 >-ro w t-Instrudion Page Dow o EDD/EDT(Electronic Data) J9 Cf) Cf) ct'l :s: -C (/J (I) J: 03:= ~ 0> ~ "C ReceiptTemp o POTWNVWTP () c Comments: Format: u <c75t.Q ~ :J U '0 .... 1ll1 c " <t:: 0 °c o State: o LEVEL IV .~ f$' .... ~Qj~§(§ ~ r-aj
~ Q.ct'l._ ~ J-c: o Other: o NELAC ~Iro I ~ :( :s On Ice: Y N
:J (]).!::: CD ~ ~ ~ ~ « I-
Z Ci. 4:1 ar o ~ " :: + V <f! cJ W "E 5 Custody Seal
~ >1 7~ , .! ~ ~ W ('Q On Bottle Y N
'(, ~ CJ) -0 Cf) ~ -~ c: On Cooler Y N ~ :& <) ~ ~ H Intact 'Y N ~ ~ '"' ~ (/)
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Colledion MATRIX ~ .~
"t 'Jl Signature
(Name, Location, Interval, etc.) Date Time \.J <. Match Y N
1
}tvJ-~_ 0,1,2.0\':).. 7/17/12. 07~ }-w X ~
2 MW-2.4_ D1Ig.2.,C\Q.. II / j~/);2 0630 l-W ~ 'f I~
3MW -:2.,1_ 07lb2..0 1J.. ,/ltd J:J... lJ IS 3-W X X ~ 'f.. ~ ~ Innn
411W " 2g_011 b2.C):l 7/1&/ll 1035 \-\J ~ ~ i
51p rv'\JJ E K1r1 '< I~
6 1 -~
7 ~ ~
8 I~ 0)
9 Iron 1~~fL.
10 I~ );).Q)01Q(
Custody Relinquished by (print): Datemme:
llOO :)~fJ~ Received by (print): Daternme: Signature:
'"IN'\ne.(" "~\ \; do.\k i / llf /1.lJ~:l Record Relinquished by {print):..j Date/Time: Signature: V Received by (print): DatelTime: Signature:
MUST be .....
Signed Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal:
Re<;elveObY{Y;~/~. 71 w II ::1-~lgtr~S
,
pOSSIbility. All SUD-comract aata Will De ClearlY notatea--.oA' your analY
\/;,,;. ,..., , .. ",,,h ... i+o ",t ""'/'AI an':>I"n\lbh f'nm fnr ~rlrlitional information, downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
wWw~netgylab~~om
Mlljtltfi/~ SjRis1152
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
August24,2012
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C12080143 Quote ID: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 5 samples for Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc on 8/3/2012 for
analysis.
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C12080143-001 MW-28_08012012 08/01/12 14:00 08/03/12 Aqueous Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
C12080143-002 MW-29_08012012 08/01/12 13:10 08/03/12 Aqueous Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved
C12080143-003 MW-37 _07302012 07/30/12 13:40 08/03/12 Aqueous Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Fluoride
E300.0 Anions
Metals by ICP, Dissolved
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved -Calculated
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C12080143-004 Trip Blank 07/30/120:00 08/03/12 Aqueous SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C12080143-005 Temp Blank 08/02/12 0:00 08/03/12 Aqueous Temperature
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. The analyses presented in this report were
performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601, unless otherwise noted.
Radiochemistry analyses were performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2325 Kerzell Lane, Casper, WY 82601,
unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical
Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By: cS¥~ D uJtA1~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2012.08.24 15:43:35 -06:00
Page 1 of 26
wWW.energyl~~.coin
klal;tital ExcBI_~ SintS'952
CLIENT: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012 Report Date: 08/24/12
Sample Delivery Group: C12080143 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 40C (±2OC)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are NO (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SO
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001, Radiochemical WY200002; Utah: WY00002; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C836
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 26
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
wYm.energylab.com
AlIaIjtitaIEx~ smc. 7952
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C12080143-003
Client Sample 10: MW-37 _07302012
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
7.23 S.u.
H -Analysis performed past recommended holding time.
Report Date: 08/24/12
Collection Date: 07/30/12 13:40
DateReceived: 08/03/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
H 0.01 A4500-H B 08/06/12 10:29/ jz
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 26
EI\l:RGY
'",
LABORATORIES
wViW.eriergylab,.com
'Mi~iExclllsncB SinCI·I952
~"8._. C-~SpeJrWV.88~235-0515
• Co.llege:Sfat!qn, T.X'888"6QO~221'
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte
Method: A2320 B
Sample 10: MBLK
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Count Result
3 Method Blank
ND
ND
1.52
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-6677 Laboratory Control Sample
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03 206 mg/L
Sample 10: C12080120-001AOUP 3 Sample Duplicate
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03 1600 mg/L
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Sample 10: C12080121-001 BMS
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC - Minimum detectable concentration
754 mg/L
ND mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
329 mg/L
RL
5.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Report Date: 08/24/12
Work Order: C12080143
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R162889
Run: MANTECH_120806B 08/06/12 14:23
Run: MANTECH_120806B 08/06/12 14:39
103 90 110
Run: MANTECH 120806B 08/06/12 15:05 -
4.5 10
0.3 10
10
Run: MANTECH_120806B 08/06/12 15:23
96 80 120
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 10 of 26
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
m.energylab.coltl
Analjtii:,iExesllsi1CdinegJl52
:OU.IlIIJi:;l'I.·III.1 DIIIU-' .ila-.... D::I· • C'llSper.)W 888 .. 235-~51 ~ Stat!~n; rx88,Q"6~O:,22t8
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2540 C
Sample 10: MB-1_120803A
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Method Blank
NO mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-2_120803A Laboratory Control Sample
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 1100 mg/L
Sample 10: C12080143-002A OUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 4480 mg/L
Sample 10: C12080143-003A MS Sample Matrix Spike
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 7870 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/24/12
Work Order: C12080143
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: BAL-1_120806A
10
Run: BAL-1_120806A
10 99 90 110
Run: BAL-1 120806A
10
Run: BAL-1_120806A
10 94 90 110
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
1.3
Batch: TOS120806A
08/06/12 13:30
08/06/12 13:30
08/06/12 13:30
5
08/06/12 13:31
Page 11 of 26
.. EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
m.energylab.Com
Alialjtical.ExullsnclI smc. 1m
;' 'dl~JI;ijW~87;t~41.i,~p,l11 .Billing~. MJ 800-7~5~4489 • C~sper,WY888-235-0515 :(~ti~ftJ~l;':'~~~lp,,¢,rty,~sn il8.~~612.;12Z5 . C~lIegeStatio:n, IX 8.8-6~O-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-F C
Sample 10: MBLK Method Blank
Fluoride ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-6892 Laboratory Control Sample
Fluoride 1.93 mg/L
Sample 10: C12080142-001AMS Sample Matrix Spike
Fluoride 1.82 mg/L
Sample 10: C12080142-001AMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Fluoride 1.86 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
Report Date: 08/24/12
Work Order: C12080143
O/OREC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R162868
Run: MANTECH_120806A 08/06/12 09:41
Run: MANTECH_120806A 08/06/12 09:44
96 90 110
Run: MANTECH_120806A 08/06/1213:12
88 80 120
Run: MANTECH 120806A 08/06/12 13:15 -
90 80 120 2.2 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 12 of 26
EI'.ERGY
L ABORATORIES
m.energylab.com
Anat;t/l:aIExesn."c.SincI,m
'B!lli.ng!;t;Mn'OO-131'~44~18 · C~sper;WVa8~ .. 235~~~15
r>_':"iJ '·"" ••. '''''' t.x88.;.6~O~~2l8
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-H B
Report Date: 08/24/12
Work Order: C12080143
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Sample 10: pH 6.86 Initial Calibration Verification Standard
Analytical Run: PHSC_101 -C_120806A
08/06/12 08:58
pH
Method: A4500-H B
Sample 10: C12080143-003AOUP
pH
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
6.84 S.u.
Sample Duplicate
7.22 S.u.
0.010 100 98 102
Run: PHSC_101-C_120806A
0.010
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
0.1
Batch: R162839
08/06/12 10:31
3
Page 13 of 26
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
m.energylab.com
AfilI;tii:aIExCBlJsrlc; SInCs '952
.. Jfel~~a~MTJllqli~o711 .:BUling~.MT 800-7~5~44'9 . C/iSper.WV 8.8~ .. 235-~515
. jYJ§t£({§~lJJ~§~R.~~id,City;SD.8'8~&.72:.j 2t 5.· College StatIon, 1X 8~8 .. 6~O-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-NH3 G
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method Blank
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 2.05 mg/L
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.93 mg/L
Sample 10: C12080142-001 EMS Sample Matrix Spike
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.94 mg/L
Sample 10: C12080142-001 EMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.93 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.050
Report Date: 08/24/12
Work Order: C12080143
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R163000
Run: TECHNICON_120808A 08/08/12 11 :56
Run: TECHNICON_ t20808A 08/08/12 11 :58
102 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120808A 08/08/12 12:00
98 80 120
Run: TECHNICON_120808A 08/08/12 12:04
99 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120808A 08/08/12 12:06
98 90 110 0.5 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 14 of 26
EN:RGY
L ABORATORIES
wWW~n~rgylab.cgm
Ana1YllCiliEXcslhmcfI SIi1is 1152
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
C~~per,WYl88-235~'51$ ., Txa8 ... $Qo~2218
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 08/24/12
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012 Work Order: C12080143
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E200.7 Analytical Run: ICP2-C_120820A
Sample 10: ICV 5 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 08/20/12 12:02
Calcium 50.8 mg/L 0.50 102 95 105
Iron 5.15 mg/L 0.030 103 95 105
Magnesium 50.6 mg/L 0.50 101 95 105
Potassium 47.3 mg/L 0.50 95 95 105
Sodium 51.7 mg/L 0.50 103 95 105
Sample 10: ICSA 5 Interference Check Sample A 08/20/12 12:34
Calcium 504 mg/L 0.50 101 80 120
Iron 188 mg/L 0.030 94 80 120
Magnesium 506 mg/L 0.50 101 80 120
Potassium 0.00170 mg/L 0.50
Sodium 0.0408 mg/L 0.50
Sample 10: ICSAB 5 Interference Check Sample AB 08/20/12 12:38
Calcium 508 mg/L 0.50 102 80 120
Iron 188 mg/L 0.030 94 80 120
Magnesium 522 mg/L 0.50 104 80 120
Potassium 0.00270 mg/L 0.50
Sodium -0.0536 mg/L 0.50
Method: E200.7 Batch: R163499
Sample 10: MB-120820A 5 Method Blank Run: ICP2-C_120820A 08/20/12 12:58
Calcium NO mg/L 0.50
Iron NO mg/L 0.030
Magnesium NO mg/L 0.50
Potassium NO mg/L 0.50
Sodium NO mg/L 2.0
Sample 10: LFB-120820A 5 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICP2-C_120820A 08/20/12 13:02
Calcium 49.8 mg/L 0.50 100 85 115
Iron 0.978 mg/L 0.030 98 85 115
Magnesium 48.2 mg/L 0.50 96 85 115
Potassium 45.4 mg/L 0.50 91 85 115
Sodium 48.9 mg/L 0.50 98 85 115
Sample 10: C12080143-003BMS2 5 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICP2-C_120820A 08/20/1213:14
Calcium 708 mg/L 0.50 87 70 130
Iron 5.05 mg/L 0.030 99 70 130
Magnesium 380 mg/L 0.50 97 70 130
Potassium 247 mg/L 0.50 91 70 130
Sodium 799 mg/L 1.6 88 70 130
Sample 10: C12080143-003BMSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICP2-C_120820A 08/20/1213:18
Calcium 716 mg/L 0.50 90 70 130 1.0 20
Iron 5.09 mg/L 0.030 100 70 130 0.8 20
Magnesium 385 mg/L 0.50 99 70 130 1.1 20
-----------------_._-----------------------------------------------------------
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 15 of 26
EI'.ERGY
LABORATORIES
wWw;~neT&yla~.coin
MiIyt!§,.~Ci1lJsi1CtI~SJiiij"52 MnSUD"'n. ll.' .".4 .4 .• ! .1.9 ... • C~~per •. W{ 8.8 .... 2~~~O~1~
• G~II~g4l;St~t'on! TX a8Q .. ~~O~~2t8
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.7
Sample 10: C12080143-003BMSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Potassium 248 mg/L
Sodium 797 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/24/12
Work Order: C12080143
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
0.50
1.6
91
87
Run: ICP2-C_120820A
70 130
70 130
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
0.4
0.3
Batch: R 163499
08/20/1213:18
20
20
Page 16 of 26
-J.
I
EN:RGY
L ABORATORIES
wWw.energylab.com
Malyl/(:aiExuHIlflCB SinclI1952
Helena, Mf811M41.2:.Dl11 .~mings, rtf 800-7~5-4489 . Casper; WY 888 .. 235-0515 '-::jj~,,$j~1;li5 -~-R,Cl~ig;~ity,~n 86,8~$f2~'1 ~25 • Co_lI~geStat~on,TX' 888-6QO:,2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result
Method: E200.8
Units RL %REC Low Limit
Report Date: 08/24/12
Work Order: C12080143
High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Analytical Run: ICPMS4-C_120820A
Sample 10: ICV 18 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 08/20/12 10:27
Arsenic 0.0497 mg/L 0.0010 99 90 110
Beryllium 0.0496 mg/L 0.0010 99 90 110
Cadmium 0.0509 mg/L 0.0010 102 90 110
Chromium 0.0469 mg/L 0.0010 94 90 110
Cobalt 0.0517 mg/L 0.0010 103 90 110
Copper 0.0506 mg/L 0.0010 101 90 110
Lead 0.0487 mg/L 0.0010 97 90 110
Manganese 0.0502 mg/L 0.0010 100 90 110
Mercury 0.00506 mg/L 0.0010 101 90 110
Molybdenum 0.0489 mg/L 0.0010 98 90 110
Nickel 0.0504 mg/L 0.0010 101 90 110
Selenium 0.0502 mg/L 0.0010 100 90 110
Silver 0.0217 mg/L 0.0010 108 90 110
Thallium 0.0496 mg/L 0.0010 99 90 110
Tin 0.0497 mg/L 0.0010 99 90 110
Uranium 0.0496 mg/L 0.00030 99 90 110
Vanadium 0.0471 mg/L 0.0010 94 90 110
Zinc 0.0512 mg/L 0.0010 102 90 110
Method: E200.8 Batch: R163583
Sample 10: LRB 18 Method Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_120820A 08/20/12 11 :03
Arsenic NO mg/L 0.0050
Beryllium NO mg/L 0.00050
Cadmium NO mg/L 0.00050
Chromium NO mg/L 0.020
Cobalt NO mg/L 0.010
Copper NO mg/L 0.010
Lead NO mg/L 0.0010
Manganese NO mg/L 0.010
Mercury NO mg/L 0.00050
Molybdenum NO mg/L 0.010
Nickel NO mg/L 0.020
Selenium NO mg/L 0.0050
Silver NO mg/L 0.010
Thallium NO mg/L 0.00050
Tin NO mg/L 0.10
Uranium NO mg/L 0.00030
Vanadium NO mg/L 0.010
Zinc NO mg/L 0.010
Sample 10: LFB 18 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_120820A 08/20/12 11 :07
Arsenic 0.0528 mg/L 0.0010 106 85 115
Beryllium 0.0509 mg/L 0.0010 102 85 115
Cadmium 0.0527 mg/L 0.0010 105 85 115
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 17 of 26
EI'.ERGY
LABORATORIES
WWW.energylab.com
Aliat;tif:aIExUosiic, SJi1U 1952
'Hil~q:~>J,fr-Jlt.;tt~dj1.'1 • B(lilngll, MT QOO~735"44'9 • Casper, WY.8~-23~-O~15 ~86.$,jI.~I~~ljI5.~·ij,i!~JaJ;,itYi S(j;8.'~'72-12~5 . ColiegeSt~tion, IX 8.'-6QO-22.18
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LFB
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Sample 10: C12070995-006BMS4
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Count Result Units
18 Laboratory Fortified Blank
0.0498 mg/L
0.0530 mg/L
0.0528 mg/L
0.0524
0.0530
0.00488
0.0508
0.0526
0.0525
0.0214
0.0530
0.0517
0.0522
0.0494
0.0552
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
18 Sample Matrix Spike
0.0514 mg/L
0.0488 mg/L
0.0487 mg/L
0.0517 mg/L
0.0503 mg/L
0.0472 mg/L
0.0504 mg/L
0.0522 mg/L
0.00460 mg/L
0.0488 mg/L
0.0481 mg/L
0.136 mg/L
0.0198 mg/L
0.0510 mg/L
0.0481 mg/L
0.119 mg/L
0.0517 mg/L
0.0503 mg/L
Sample 10: C12070995-006BMSO 18 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Arsenic 0.0515 mg/L
Beryllium 0.0478 mg/L
Cadmium 0.0482 mg/L
Chromium 0.0524 mg/L
Cobalt 0.0501 mg/L
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
0.0482 mg/L
0.0504 mg/L
0.0514 mg/L
Report Date: 08/24/12
Work Order: C12080143
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0050
0.0050
0.0050
0.0010
0.0010
0.00010
0.0010
0.0050
0.0010
0.0010
0.00050
0.0010
0.00030
0.010
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0050
0.0050
0.0050
0.0010
0.0010
100
106
106
105
106
98
101
105
105
107
106
103
104
99
110
102
98
97
98
100
94
101
102
92
97
95
94
99
102
96
100
100
99
102
96
96
100
100
96
101
101
Run: ICPMS4-C_120820A
85 115
85 115
85 115
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
115
Run: ICPMS4-C 120820A
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
Run: ICPMS4-C_120820A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
130
130
130
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
0.1
2.0
1.0
1.3
0.4
2.1
0.0
1.4
Batch: R 163583
08/20/12 11 :07
08/21/12 01 :56
08/21/12 02:01
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Page 18 of 26
Ef\ERGY
LABORATORIES
WWW.energylab.com
AliBlytlCai ~"1Isi1cB SInes 1952
n.~~,Mfll1;.4t~~Plll . Bining~ • .r(f.OO-7~5-44~~. Casper"WY ~~@ .. 235-~~15 . ~1~.a~lf~,§ __ ·~;~Rig~gitY,'SIf.8.8'-672-j225,. Coll~ge:Sfati'm, IX ,88~-6QO-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result
Method: E200.8
Units
Sample 10: C12070995-006BMSO 18 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Mercury 0.00484 mg/L
Molybdenum 0.0488 mg/L
Nickel 0.0482 mg/L
Selenium 0.131 mg/L
Silver 0.0204 mg/L
Thallium 0.0512 mg/L
Tin 0.0479 mg/L
Uranium 0.120 mg/L
Vanadium 0.0518 mg/L
Zinc 0.0508 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL
0.00010
0.0010
0.0050
0.0010
0.0010
0.00050
0.0010
0.00030
0.010
0.010
%REC Low Limit
Report Date: 08/24/12
Work Order: C12080143
High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R 163583
Run: ICPMS4-C_120820A 08/21/1202:01
97 70 130 5.1 20
97 70 130 0.0 20
95 70 130 0.3 20
85 70 130 3.5 20
102 70 130 3.1 20
102 70 130 0.2 20
96 70 130 0.4 20
100 70 130 0.1 20
100 70 130 0.2 20
100 70 130 0.9 20
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 19 of 26
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiOiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiini EI'I:RGY
LABORATORIES
m;~nergyla~.com
Atialyt/l;alixeI/JsiJCs SiniS 1m , " ,':, ;',' '" ffel~n'~I,,·~t:~~l"~l:~ .. D~~ i • 'Bini~gs, MT B.O~-7~5~448~. Casper, WY 888 .. 235".~,15 dillett!!~,,8)J:i~@.;ljt§ ·,~;~pJq,~fty; Sp,888-'7~:'225 • ColI~ge:Sfa.tip'n, rX88P-6QO~2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Report Date: 08/24/12
Work Order: C12080143
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual
Method: E300.0 Analytical Run: IC2-C_120808A
Sample ID: ICV-OBOB12-10 2 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 08/08/12 18:18
Chloride 10.1 mg/L 1.0 101 90 110
Sulfate 41.0 mg/L 1.0 102 90 110
Method: E300.0 Batch: R163035
Sample ID: ICB-OBOS12-11 2 Method Blank Run: IC2-C_120808A 08/08/12 18:35
Chloride NO mg/L 4.0
Sulfate NO mg/L 20
Sample ID: LFB-OSOS12-12 2 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: IC2-C_120808A 08/08/12 18:53
Chloride 10.1 mg/L 1.0 101 90 110
Sulfate 40.8 mg/L 1.0 101 90 110
Sample ID: C120B0125-001BMS 2 Sample Matrix Spike Run: IC2-C_120808A 08/08/12 19:45
Chloride 122 mg/L 2.1 100 90 110
Sulfate 1200 mg/L 8.3 102 90 110
Sample I D: C120B0125-001 BMSD 2 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: IC2-C_120808A 08/08/12 20:02
Chloride 120 mg/L 2.1 98 90 110 1.8 10
Sulfate 1190 mg/L 8.3 99 90 110 1.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 20 of 26
EI'.ERGY
L ABORATORIES
,.; m.energylabiom
MI1yt1t:aIExUUsiJ&, SltiUrm
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E353.2
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method Blank
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.55 mg/L
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.01 mg/L
Sample 10: C12080155-0010MS Sample Matrix Spike
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 18.1 mg/L
Sample 10: C12080155-0010MSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 17.8 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.50
0.50
Report Date: 08/24/12
Work Order: C12080143
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R162867
Run: TECHNICON_120806A 08/06/12 11 :43
Run: TECHNICON_120806A 08/06/12 11 :46
102 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120806A 08/06/12 11 :48
103 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120806A 08/06/12 13:06
102 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120806A 08/06/12 13:08
99 90 110 1.7 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 21 of 26
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
wWw.energylab.~om
AniIjtIt;aIExcsJJsnc, $inU 1m ., '.: ~~e!ei!a~:Mf:·8lJ,~4:j~-P:7ti ~· Bj(ling~,MT 80~-735~448~. C~sperf wY8i8 .. 23~-O~15 'ill~!~~'!JY~@!j~jD~lf~l ·g~p.J~ ,¢t~,S~.,888:-~72-J 225 • CQllege:station, IX a88"6~O-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte
Method: E900.1
Sample 10: LCS-GA-0562
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Count Result Units
Laboratory Control Sample
27.4 pCi/L
Report Date: 08/24/12
Work Order: C12080143
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run:G5000VV_120807A
131 70 130
RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: GA-0562
08108/12 06:49
S
-LCS response i~ outside of the acceptance range for this analysis, Since the MB, MS, and MSD are acceptable the batch is approved.
Sample 10: MB-GA-0562
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
3 Method Blank
-0.242
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 0.729
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.34
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
Sample 10: C12080110-001HMS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample Matrix Spike
Sample 10: C12080110-001HMSO
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
54.4 pC ilL
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
50.3 pC ilL
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Run:G5000VV_120807A
Run:G5000VV_120807A
119 70 130
Run: G5000VV 120807A -
107 70 130
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
7.9
08/08/12 06:49
U
08108/12 06:49
08/08/12 06:49
31
Page 22 of 26
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
wWW~nergyl~b.C9m
MiIytWaIEi_~' SJnCi 1m
-448~. C~sper. WV8.~'"23~~O~15
• ~l!lIege:Stat!pn, TK .. 8a~ .. 6~b~~21a
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 08/24/12
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012 Work Order: C12080143
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R162997
Sample 10: 07-Aug-12_LCS_ 4 16 Laboratory Control Sample Run: 5975VOC1 -120807B 08/07/1213:09
Acetone 73 ug/L 20 73 70 130
Benzene 11 ug/L 1.0 106 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 9.3 ug/L 1.0 93 70 130
Chloroform 8.7 ug/L 1.0 87 70 130
Chloromethane 8.9 ug/L 1.0 89 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 22 ug/L 1.0 108 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 99 ug/L 20 99 70 130
Methylene chloride 7.2 ug/L 1.0 72 70 130
Naphthalene 13 ug/L 1.0 127 70 130
o-Xylene 11 ug/L 1.0 112 70 130
Toluene 11 ug/L 1.0 108 70 130
Xylenes, Total 33 ug/L 1.0 109 70 130
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 103 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 102 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 116 80 130
Surr: T 0luene-d8 1.0 115 80 120
Sample 10: 07-Aug-12_MBLK_7 16 Method Blank Run: 5975VOC1 120807B 08/07/12 15:29
Acetone NO ug/L 20
Benzene NO ug/L 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L 1.0
Chloroform NO ug/L 1.0
Chloromethane NO ug/L 1.0
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L 1.0
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L 20
Methylene chloride NO ug/L 1.0
Naphthalene NO ug/L 1.0
o-Xylene NO ug/L 1.0
Toluene NO ug/L 1.0
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L 1.0
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 103 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 102 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 117 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 114 80 120
Sample 10: C12070956-003JMS 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: 5975VOC1 120807B 08/07/1222:15
Acetone 1500 ug/L 200 76 70 130
Benzene 200 ug/L 10 97 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 170 ug/L 10 86 70 130
Chloroform 160 ug/L 10 82 70 130
Chloromethane 350 ug/L 10 83 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 400 ug/L 10 98 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 1900 ug/L 200 96 70 130
Methylene chloride 150 ug/L 10 68 70 130 S
Naphthalene 230 ug/L 10 113 70 130
-------------------------------------_._--------------------------------------------
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Page 23 of 26
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
wWw~nergylab.com
Aiii1Ytk:alExUlJsncd/m '·952
,DUIIJIIXlI.·m.1 tlIJIU-I;iI:I .. ~~tl9,· Clisper,W¥ 8,8-235.;0515
•• C~lleg~:Stat!~n, TX ;8 .... 6.0-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 08/24/12
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012 Work Order: C12080143
Analyte Count Result Units RL O/OREC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R 162997
Sample 10: C12070956-003JMS 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: 5975VOC1_120807B 08/07/1222:15
o-Xylene 200 ug/L 10 102 70 130
Toluene 210 ug/L 10 98 70 130
Xylenes, Total 600 ug/L 10 100 70 130
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 103 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 102 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 116 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 116 80 120
Sample 10: C12070956-003JMSO 16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: 5975VOC1 120807B 08/07/1222:50
Acetone 1400 ug/L 200 70 70 130 7.7 20
Benzene 200 ug/L 10 96 70 130 0.8 20
Carbon tetrachloride 170 ug/L 10 86 70 130 0.0 20
Chloroform 160 ug/L 10 81 70 130 1.5 20
Chloromethane 330 ug/L 10 74 70 130 4.9 20
m+p-Xylenes 400 ug/L 10 99 70 130 0.8 20
Methyl ethyl ketone 1800 ug/L 200 92 70 130 4.3 20
Methylene chloride 150 ug/L 10 65 70 130 4.2 20 S
Naphthalene 230 ug/L 10 113 70 130 0.3 20
o-Xylene 200 ug/L 10 102 70 130 0.4 20
Toluene 210 ug/L 10 99 70 130 0.8 20
Xylenes, Total 610 ug/L 10 100 70 130 0.7 20
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 104 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 101 70 130 0.0 10
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 117 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 115 80 120 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Page 24 of 26
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
Standard Reporting Procedures
:.H{'·na;J4"(811~412·,:oitj ··BilUng~, MT,O~"735w4489 . Casper,WY888-235 .. 0515 &~!~~=7J15: ~,~~~i~C·ijy;Sit'~8~ .. ~12-12~5 • CQllege.StatiD,n, Ix 88.-690~U18,
Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual
Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time.
Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected, data units are typically noted as -dry.
For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried and ground prior to sample analysis.
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Login completed by: Corinne Wagner
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 8/8/2012
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
(Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters
such as pH, DO, Res CI, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.)
Temp Blank received?
ContainerlT emp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes D
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
4.0'C On Ice
Yes 0
Yes 0
C12080143
Date Received: 8/3/2012
Received by: tj
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
Carrier FedEx
name:
Not Present D
Not Present D
Not Present 0
Not Applicable D
No VOA vials submitted D
Not Applicable D
Page 25 of 26
""U Q) co
(1)
I\)
0>
o -I\)
0>
EN:RGY
, , mD" Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record Page _, _ of --1-
---------- -~ - --......... ---.,.-.......... -""'---... . --Company Name:
'F\Ae.l~
Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. Sample Origin EPA/State Compliance:
~ rJC.IS'd 3 iJ Q~r·1-e.(" G-ro"",J Wl1\ter .:4o.~ State: V\"f" Yes ® No 0
Report Mail Address: pO SO ')( gOG} Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
~)~t\J ;..,~ U.,-8YSil (fr:J..ifl11 f'",Jme.r t.13h 67g .2.22.1 ~nfle'" Uo)I.JG4f
Invoice Address: ......., Invoice Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
SI'\h;te. O(-\,,\'c\ -!v..rK Y3:5 b78 .u21
Special Report/Formats: ~ &rm&[1S7@O@ OO~@M~Ii[ID • Contact ELI prior to Sh~'1b~
0 .... RUSH sample submittal r-' --,. -E.~ ~o (I)~ for charges and Cooler IDCa); ,
~cc ;gOI CU C ~ R scheduling.-See v{~~ ._> 0 >.(6 W t:. Instruction Page o OW 0 EDD/EDT(Electronic Data) ~(/)~ m ~ 03:= ~ Ol ~ :c "'0 Receipt Temp o POTWMlWTP Format: () c Comments: ~«~I.Q~ ~ 5 U 4,0 ocA.j D State: 0 'LEVEL IV o .... all c: &.. ~ .... Qj.$! a'C ....... C'CI . ~J ~ ~~I~~ ~ ~ c ~ D Other: 0 NELAC ,i '-Mw ,·37 On Ice: ::J
::J (I).: Q) :s: ~ t-5 zo.«lg>o ~ W "E '']:'ncl~~ Cuatody Seal ~ >1 +! ~ ~ W as On Bottle ·N
II (JJ 'C I~ c: ple~e On Cooler 0 .5 H '~N Intact 'S ~ C/)
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection MATRIX 0 ~ <: SIgnature
(Name, Location, Interval, etc.) Date Time Match
1 1-J\\ W -~. {))<.o \:AU '~:l. g/t/2.0\2 ~40D )-VJ ~.
2 M \/Y-;l.Cf_O[(Ol 'J..Oi:J. ~1l1 ;J.0i2 I~\O 2-W X X ~
3 7!30/-;Al".. )3LtO fo-W X ~ Ftw-~7_ 0730.2.0tl [nnn
4 :Tr, t> .~ \ o..r\X 71 '-30 /;l(Ji~ ECJ.:2~O' 4~: ~
5 J f'=' ~
6 ~
7 ~
8 ~ 01
9 i' 10 b:;n
Custody Relinquished by (print): Daterrime: Signature: Received by (print): Daterrime: Signa ure: rknl\~'" UcH~JG.tl g/~/~)J.. HOD "::),.,n.J1k fl· JJ'L. .A Record Relinquished by (print): J Daterrime: Signature: ,-' Received by (print): Datafflme: Signature:
MUST be .
Signed KecelVeu uy LaDOrawry: ' Datelltme: / , ~ ~TI;;'~, II~ Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal: ~':~-}::L
In certain circumstances. samples submitted to Energy laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to ~tmplete the analysis .... 1 ~ if
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report. -"";''J fOCJ
Visit our web site at www.energylab.comfor additional information, downloadable fee schedule. forms, and links.
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com (.....Hel!lna.Mr.817 .. 412-0711 -Billings.MT 800-735-4489 · Gasper, WV 888 .. 235 .. 0515
An,lyticalucsUIHII:BSi11Cl11952 " ~'_"" §iO~tt~, WY,8$& .. $86 .. 1175 • Rapid City, Sf} 888~'12-1225 . College Station, IX 888-690 .. 2218
August30,2012
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C 12080830
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
Quote 10: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 3 samples for Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc on 8/17/2012
for analysis.
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C12080830-001 MW-26_08162012 08/16/126:40 08/17/12 Aqueous SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C12080830-002 MW-65_08162012 08/16/12 6:40 08/17/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12080830-003 Trip Blank 6706 08/16/12 0:00 08/17/12 Aqueous Same As Above
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. The analyses presented in this report were
performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601 , unless otherwise noted.
Radiochemistry analyses were performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2325 Kerzell Lane, Casper, WY 82601 ,
unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical
Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By:
cS¥~D uJ~~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2012.08.30 13:12:37 -06:00
Page 1 of 12
www.energylaib.com
AflBtytical ExcsIlIHlCB Sines 1952
~~!ena; MT8n .. 412 .. 071 t • Billings,MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
" t',Gille6e, wY',866-6B6-7175 • Ra id City; SI} 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
CLIENT: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012 Report Date: 08/30/12
Sample Delivery Group: C12080830 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4'C (±2'C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are NO (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SO
eli-cs -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTI FICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001, Radiochemical WY200002; Utah: WY00002; Washington: C836
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 12
E~RGY
LABORAT ORIES
www.energyla.b.com
AIl8IyticaI Excslhmca ~ 1952
~'HeI~na, Mt'871-472~(J711 " Billings, MT 800-735,.4489 " Casper, WY888 .. 235-0515 il~~e;WY8B, &~6,.,. 86-7175 " Rapid City, SI} 888-672-1225 " College Station, IX 888-690-221,8 ~ ...• :--':'",<" .;>........ .,
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte
Method: SW8260B
Sample 10: C12080808-001 KMS
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloromethane
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: T oluene-d8
Count Result Units
14 Sample Matrix Spike
210 ug/L
180 ug/L
370
360
2100
190
170
200
220
560
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Sample 10: C12080808-001 KMSO 14 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Benzene 230 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride 200 ug/L
Chloromethane 370 ug/L
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: T oluene-d8
Sample 10: 082212_LCS_6
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloromethane
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
R -RPD exceeds advisory limit.
420
2200
210
210
240
230
660
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
14 Laboratory Control Sample
11 ug/L
9.8 ug/L
10 ug/L
20
120
9.4
10
11
11
31
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Report Date: 08/30/12
Work Order: C12080830
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
10
10
10
10
200
10
10
10
10
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
10
10
10
10
200
10
10
10
10
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
101
92
85
88
107
89
83
100
104
92
91
91
90
102
112
101
84
102
109
98
103
122
109
109
93
92
9'1
98
110
98
101
101
116
94
100
112
106
104
87
89
86
Run: SATURNCA_120822A
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
80
70
80
80
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
120
130
120
120
Run: SATURNCA_120822A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
80
70
80
80
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
120
130
120
120
Run: SATURNCA_120822A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
80
70
80
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
120
130
130
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
9.8
8.7
0.4
15
1.5
9.4
21
19
3.9
17
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Batch: R163670
08/22/1222:04
08/22/1222:40
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
10
10
10
10
R
08/22/12 14:18
Page 6 of 12
E~RGY
LABORAT ORIES
www.energyJab.com
Analytfcal ExCSliBnCB Sines 1952
Helena, MT'S71·472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
' .. ~~ __ ~m~tie., w-r 866-.~.8a-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • Col/ege Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result
Method: SW8260B
Units
Sample 10: 082212_LCS_6
Surr: Toluene-d8
14 Laboratory Control Sample
Sample 10: 082212_MBLK_8
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloromethane
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
14 Method Blank
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
Report Date: 08/30/12
Work Order: C12080830
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
1.0 98
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 91
1.0 90
1.0 87
1.0 92
Run: SATURNCA_120822A
80 120
Run: SATURNCA_120822A
80
70
80
80
120
130
120
120
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Batch: R163670
08/22/12 14:18
08/22/12 15:31
Page 7 of 12
EI'.ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsllSIICB Sincg 1952
... :,H~fe,~a,MrB77;'472-0711 • Billings, MY 800-735-4489 11 Casper, WY 888 .. 235-0515
'WYI6~,,:'B5-1n5 • Rapid crty, so 888-612-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte
Method: SWS260B
Sample 10: C120S0960-0031MS
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: C120S0960-0031MSO
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: T oluene-d8
Sample 10: OS2712_LCS_ 4
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Count Result Units
15 Sample Matrix Spike
210 ug/L
200 ug/L
200
210
380
2100
190
180
210
220
600
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
15 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
240 ug/L
220 ug/L
230 ug/L
250 ug/L
420
2500
220
210
230
230
650
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
15 Laboratory Control Sample
11 ug/L
10 ug/L
11 ug/L
11
21
130
10
11
12
11
33
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Report Date: 08/30/12
Work Order: C12080830
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
10
10
10
10
10
200
10
10
10
10
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
10
10
10
10
10
200
10
10
10
10
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
106
100
99
106
95
103
96
91
107
108
99
88
92
89
102
119
111
114
124
105
125
109
106
116
116
109
92
96
89
101
110
103
109
107
103
127
101
107
120
112
109
Run: SATURNCA_120827A
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
80
70
80
80
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
120
130
120
120
Run: SATURNCA_120827A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
80
70
80
80
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
120
130
120
120
Run: SATURNCA_120827A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
12
11
14
16
9.8
19
12
15
7.9
7.5
9.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Batch: R163830
08/27/1221 :37
08/27/1222:13
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
10
10
10
10
08/27/12 14:06
Page 8 of 12
------==== EI'.ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
Allalytical ExcsDsnCB SincIJ 1952
'::, ,H;leQ,t!, MT 87,1~4l,2-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 " Casper, W'f 888-235-0515
\i!!:~~e; Wt'~6~§~6-1J15 • Rap,ip Gfty, 50,888-672-1225 -College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result
Method: SW8260B
Units
Sample 10: 082712_LCS_ 4 15 Laboratory Control Sample
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: 082712_MBLK_6 15 Method Blank
Benzene NO ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L
Chloroform NO ug/L
Chloromethane NO ug/L
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L
Methylene chloride NO ug/L
Naphthalene NO ug/L
o-Xylene NO ug/L
Toluene NO ug/L
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
RL
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Report Date: 08/30/12
Work Order: C12080830
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
90
90
91
100
87
92
84
99
Run: SATURNCA_120827A
80 120
70 130
80 130
80 120
Run: SATURNCA_120827A
80 120
70 130
80 120
80 120
Batch: R 163830
08/27/12 14:06
08/27/12 15:32
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 12
~~~~~~-----------------------------------------------EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsH8IlCfI SJm:g 1952
, Helena, Mr877~72-0111 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WV 888-235-0515
~,~"'=C .Jg~II~~Ji~ WYS6&-$B6-7175 • Ra~i~ City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: SW8260B
Sample 10: 082812_MBLK_6 5 Method Blank
Chloroform NO ug/L
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: C12081068-003CMS 5 Sample Matrix Spike
Chloroform 240 ug/L
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: C12081068-003CMSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Chloroform 240 ug/L
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: T oluene-d8
Sample 10: 082812_LCS_ 4 5 Laboratory Control Sample
Chloroform 10 ug/L
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: T oluene-d8
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
RL
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Report Date: 08/30/12
Work Order: C 12080830
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R163906
Run: SATURNCA_120828A 08/28/12 12:50
90 80 120
94 70 130
86 80 120
101 80 120
Run: SATURNCA_120828A 08/28/12 19:49
120 70 130
94 80 120
99 70 130
94 80 120
99 80 120
Run: SATURNCA_120828A 08/28/12 20:25
119 70 130 0.7 20
88 80 120 0.0 10
94 70 130 0.0 10
88 80 120 0.0 10
103 80 120 0.0 10
Run: SATURNCA_120828A 08/28/12 11 :37
104 70 130
93 80 120
92 70 130
91 80 130
99 80 120
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 10 of 12
--------========== EI\ERGY,
LAS ORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExCBI/snCB SiIlCB 1!152
MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 .. Casper, WY 888-235-0515
'Gm8tte':WY'I!66·;&B61~7n5 • Rapip City, SO 888~672-1225 If College Station, IX 888~690-2218
Standard Reporting Procedures
Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual
Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time.
Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected, data units are typically noted as -dry.
For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried and ground prior to sample analysis.
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Login completed by: Tracy Judge
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 8/21/2012
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
(Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters
such as pH, DO, Res CI, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.)
Temp Blank received?
ContaineriT emp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes D
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
3.2"C On Ice
Yes [{1
Yes D
C12080830
Date Received: 8/17/2012
Received by: km
Carrier NDA
name:
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
Not Present D
Not Present D
Not Present [{1
Not Applicable D
No VOA vials submitted D
Not Applicable [{1
Page 11 of 12
--EN:RGY m1 Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record Page_J _of_l_
------~-.... --_ .... -.. ,.. ----.... _-.. ~ ... -.... __ ._ ... -.... --_ .. _._.,
Company Name: f~e\s Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. Sample Origin EPA/State Compliance:
I E1\U~~ 3t'ci ()\,)..orter G-roUllJWC\.+er .'l.OI~ State: lA"""r Yes f5if No 0
~
Report Mail Address: PO gcq Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print) I
~O)( .22:2.1 ';t1"~r »oILd~ i 5\OJ)dinE\ txr 845i1 GrlXf"'t' in l' ~ N1eC'" 4315 G78
I nvoice Address: Invoice Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order: I
SG\.rr"Ic. St,.r'1<
Special Report/Formats: S ~[b W®O@ ~rn®OIJ~Lf@:1ID .. Contact ELI prior to s~p;:);M
0 (i) RUSH sample submittal
Cooler lots): ~o (/)..t.= ~ R for charges and ~co~OI (i) Cl scheduling -See ctV ._> 0 >om w t:. Instruction Page Dow o EDD/EDT(Electronic Data) B U) (/) co S: c:: ()s (/) :r: 0s:= m 0> "0 Receipt Temp o POTWIWWTP () c Comments: Format: u<c73,.Q~ ::J U i.2-'0 L.. CDI c: « ° °C o State: o LEVEL IV .... mel> c '-I-ea ] o.~rgo ~ c
(!)N o Other: o NELAC L-On Ice: E~rn ' :::J
::l el>'!:::C)s I-
zo..<laro W "0 5 Custody Seal l-E >1 W ea On Bottle Y N C'il CJ) "0 ~: (/) >1\ c On Gooier
\,..) ro
0 en H Intact
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Col/ection MATRIX > Signature
(Name, Location, Interval, etc.) Date Time Match
1
MvJ-'l.' .. 08 1~201Q.. gil ,1:1.0\'2. Cb~D 3-W ~ ~
2 '6/1 (,/:10 \~ ~-w y. I~ MW-bS_DSlb~O);:t Db4()
3
-r'rj 0 Rlo-nk ({7fJJ [(Q)
Inn"
4 I \ I~
I~
5 I~ ~ I
6 ~
7 ~ j
8 ~ I
,
9 ~ I
10 ~ I
Custody ~;~;; by"~ni\ 1'1,.~ OaterTime: ~~tAl~ Received by (print): OaterTime: Signature:
g/lb/.:t(j(~ 1100 Record Relinquished by (print): \J OatelTime: Signature: --Received by (print): DaterTime: Signature:
MUST be .
Signed ~~l'H;T~ DatefTIme: rg..J1 6 Signature:
Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal: Acrr7J_~ j ~ 10 .. A-I 1_,,,
In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report.
Visit our web site at www.energylab.com for additional information, downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
TabF
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
r -
TabF1
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
August 2012
00' www~n"gylal>.com r--Helena, MI 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515 ~ AnatyticalExcsUBflCISincB 7!152 J ... _~illette, WY 8&6-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218 EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12080469-003
Client Sample ID: MW-11_08072012
Report Date: 09/05/12
Collection Date: 08/07/12 11 :30
DateReceived: 08/10/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
166 ug/L
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
10 E200.8 08/27/12 17:291 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 5 of 21
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
wwwienergylab.com
Analytical ExCSUIMCB Sines '152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SI) 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C 12080469-004
Client Sample 10: MW-14_08072012
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
2300 ug/l
Qualifier Rl
10
Report Date: 09/05/12
Collection Date: 08/07/12 13:21
DateReceived: 08/1 0/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.8 08/27/12 17:34/ cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 21
EN:RGY
L ABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
Analylical ExcsllBm:" Sines 7852
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 · Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~illette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12080469-002
Client Sample ID: MW-25_08062012
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
6.72 ug/l
Qualifier RL
0.30
Report Date: 09/05/12
Collection Date: 08/06/12 11:10
DateReceived: 08/10/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
E200.8 08/27/1217:251 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 21
EI'.ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
AnalYtical ExCBIism;s Sines '152 L Helena, MT 877-472 .. 0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888 .. 235-0515
'~illetta, WY 866 .. 686 .. 7175 • Rapid City, S[) 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12080469-005
Client Sample ID: MW-26_08082012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TOS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Uranium
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
78
1.6
3210
67.4
NO
NO
NO
2200
NO
NO
17
NO
NO
NO
90.0
96.0
93.0
93.0
o -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Report Date: 09/05/12
Collection Date: 08/08/12 13:31
DateReceived: 08/10/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
0 4 E300.0 08/14/12 04:01 1 Ijl
0.1 E353.2 08/13/12 16:31 fir
10 A2540 C 08/10/12 15:08 1 ab
0.30 E200.8 08/27/1217:381 cp
20 SW8260B 08/14/1219:18/jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/14/1219:181 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/14/1219:181 jk
0 500 SW8260B 08/14/1218:41 1 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/14/1219:181 jk
20 SW8260B 08/14/1219:181 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/14/1219:181 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/14/1219:181 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/14/1219:181 jk
1.0 SW8260B 08/14/1219:181 jk
80-120 SW8260B 08/14/1219:181 jk
70-130 SW8260B 08/14/1219:181 jk
80-120 SW8260B 08/14/1219:181 jk
80-120 SW8260B 08/14/1219:181 jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7 of 21
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www~energylab.com
Analytical UCSUBflCB Sines 7952
Helena, MT 877 .. 472-0111 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~il!ette, WY866 .. 6B6-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • Colleg~ Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12080469-006
Client Sample ID: MW-30_08072012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
139
18
38.4
8.04
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/l
ug/l
ug/l
Report Date: 09/05/12
Collection Date: 08/07/1210:25
DateReceived: 08/1 0/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
D 2 E300.0 08/14/12 04:181 Ijl
D 2 E353.2 08/13/12 16:38 1 Ir
5.0 E200.8 08/27/1218:00/cp
0.30 E200.8 08/27/1218:00/cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 8 of 21
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical Excstlsnc. Sinc, '952
Helena, MT 877-472 .. 0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 86S .. 686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
Lab ID: C 12080469-00 1
Client Sample ID: MW-31_08062012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
175
21
571
1400
0-Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
Report Date: 09/05/12
Collection Date: 08/06/12 13:15
DateReceived: 08/10/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
o
o
2
4
10
E300.0
E353.2
E300.0
A2540 C
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
08/14/12 03:431 Ijl '
08/13/12 16:231 Ir
08/14/12 03:431 Ijl
08/10/12 15:08 1 ab
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 3 of 21
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
WWN.energyJab.com
Analytical ExcsJlsnc, Sines 7952
Helena, MT 871-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~illette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12080469-007
Client Sample ID: MW-35_08082012
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
273 ug/l
18.8 ug/l
0.61 ug/l
26.2 ug/l
4.2 pCi/l
0.5 , pCi/l
0.2 pCi/l
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Qualifier Rl
10
5.0
0.50
0.30
Report Date: 09/05/12
Collection Date: 08/08/1208:35
DateReceived: 08/1 0/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date / By
E200.8 08/27/1218:051 cp
E200.8 08/27/1218:051 cp
E200.8 08/27/1218:051 cp
E200.8 08/27/1218:051 cp
E900.1 08/30/12 21 :38 1 Ibb
E900.1 08/30/12 21 :38 1 Ibb
E900.1 08/30/12 21 :38 1 Ibb
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 21
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
Analytical ExCBIIenc. Sines '152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WV 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C 12080469-008
Client Sample 10: MW-65_08072012
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
2250 ug/l
Qualifier Rl
10
Report Date: 09/05/12
Collection Date: 08/07/12 13:21
DateReceived: 08/1 0/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date I By
E200.8 08/27/1218:091 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 10 of 21
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExC8llBIICB Sincs 7952
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, S[) 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
LablD: C12080469-009
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank 6746
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: T oluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
90.0 %REC
97.0 %REC
81.0 %REC
93.0 %REC
Qualifier Rl
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 09/05/12
Collection Date: 08/08/12
DateReceived: 08/10/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date / By
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:551 jk
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:551 jk
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:551 jk
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:551 jk
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:551 jk
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:55 1 jk
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:55/ jk
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:551 jk
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:551 jk
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:551 jk
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:55/ jk
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:55/ jk
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:551 jk
SW8260B 08/14/12 16:551 jk
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 11 of 21
EI'I:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
AnalYtical ExC8llBflCf Sincs 1952
Helena, MT 877-472-0111 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WV 888-235-0515
~illette, WY 86&-686-1115 • Rapid City, SD 888-612-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
LablD: C12080469-010
Client Sample ID: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
2.0
Qualifier RL
Report Date: 09/05/12
Collection Date: 08/09/12
DateReceived: 08/1 0/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date I By
E170.1 08/10/12 12:46/ kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 12 of 21
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyiab.com
Analytical ExesllBfiCf Sines '952
Helena, MT 877 .. 472 .. 0111 • Billings, MT 800-735 .. 4489 . Casper, WV 888-235 .. 0515
'~Ulet±e, WV 866~6B6· 7175 • Rapid City, S[} 888-672·1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
ANAL VTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
September 05, 2012
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C12080469 Quote ID: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 10 samples for Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc on 8/10/2012
for analysis.
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix . Test
C12080469-001 MW-31_08062012 08/06/12 13:15 08/10/12 Aqueous E300.0 Anions
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Solids, Total Dissolved
C 12080469-002 MW-25_08062012 08/06/12 11 :10 08/10/12 Aqueous Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
C 12080469-003 MW-11_08072012 08/07/12 11 :30 08/10/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12080469-004 MW-14_08072012 08/07/12 13:21 08/10/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12080469-005 MW-26_08082012 08/08/12 13 :31 08/10/12 Aqueous E300.0 Anions
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Solids, Total Dissolved
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C12080469-006 MW-30_08072012 08/07/12 10:25 08/10/12 Aqueous E300.0 Anions
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
C 12080469-007 MW -35_08082012 08/08/128:35 08/10/12 Aqueous Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
C 12080469-008 MW-65_08072012 08/07/12 13:21 08/10/12 Aqueous Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
C 12080469-009 Trip Blank 6746 08/08/120:00 08/10/12 Aqueous SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C12080469-010 Temp Blank 08/09/120:00 08/10/12 Aqueous Temperature
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. The analyses presented in this report were
performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601, unless otherwise noted.
Radiochemistry analyses were performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2325 Kerzell Lane, Casper, WY 82601,
unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical
Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By:
cS¥~ D uJtAi~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2012.09.05 11: 16:53 -06:00
Page 1 of 21
www.energylab.com ('
Analytical ExcsllsnclJ Sines 1952
Helena, MT 877 .. 472-0111 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 86&-686-7175 • Ra id Ci ,SD 888-672-1225 • Colle e Station TX888-690-2218
CLIENT: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012 Report Date: 09/05/12
Sample Delivery Group: C12080469 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 40C (±2OC)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SD
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001, Radiochemical WY200002; Utah: WY00002; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C836
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 21
EI'.ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com I
Analytical Excsll8llcB Sines 1952 J _ Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~illette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2540 C
Sample 10: MB-1_120S10A
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Method Blank
NO mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-2_120S10A Laboratory Control Sample
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 1090 mg/L
Sample 10: C120S041S-007A OUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 1140 mg/L
Sample 10: C120S041S-00SA MS Sample Matrix Spike
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 18200 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 09/05/12
Work Order: C 12080469
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: BAL-1_120810A
10
Run: BAL-1_120810A
10 98 90 110
Run: BAL-1 120810A
10
Run: BAL-1_120810A
10 99 90 110
NO - Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
0.2
Batch: TDS120810A
08/10/12 12:31
08/10/12 12:31
08/10/12 12:55
5
08/10/12 12:55
Page 13 of 21
EI'.ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
Analytical ExcslisnclJ SiRcIJ '952
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • Col/ege Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA)' Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result
Method: E200.8
Units RL %REC Low Limit
Report Date: 09/05/12
Work Order: C 12080469
High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Analytical Run: ICPMS4-C_120827A
Sample 10: ICV 4 Initial Calibration Verification Standard 08/27/1220:03
Manganese 0.0495 mg/L
Selenium 0.0507 mg/L
Thallium 0.0501 mg/L
Uranium 0.0507 mg/L
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: C12080469-008AMS 4 Sample Matrix Spike
Manganese 2.19 mg/L
Selenium 0.0552 mg/L
Thallium 0.0564 mg/L
Uranium 0.120 mg/L
Sample 10: C12080469-008AMSO 4 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Manganese 2.26 mg/L
Selenium 0.0559 mg/L
Thallium 0.0594 mg/L
Uranium 0.126 mg/L
Sample 10: LRB 4 Method Blank
Manganese NO mg/L
Selenium NO mg/L
Thallium NO mg/L
Uranium NO mg/L
Sample 10: LFB 4 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Manganese 0.0528 mg/L
Selenium 0.0516 mg/L
Thallium 0.0537 mg/L
Uranium 0.0525 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
0.0010 99 90 110
0.0010 101 90 110
0.0010 100 90 110
0.00030 101 90 110
Batch: R163876
Run: ICPMS4-C_120827A 08/27/1218:14
0.0010 70 130 A
0.0010 110 70 130
0.0010 112 70 130
0.00030 100 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_120827A 08/27/1218:18
0.0010 70 130 2.8 20 A
0.0010 111 70 130 1.2 20
0.0010 118 70 130 5.2 20
0.00030 112 70 130 4.9 20
Run: ICPMS4-C_120827A 08/27/1220:25
0.010
0.0050
0.00050
0.00030
Run: ICPMS4-C_120827A 08/27/1220:29
0.0010 106 85 115
0.0010 103 85 115
0.0010 107 85 115
0.00030 105 85 115
A -The analyte level was greater than four times the spike level. In
accordance with the method % recovery is not calculated.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 14 of 21
I
EN:RGY
L ABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExC81IsncB Sines '952
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result
Method: E300.0
Units RL
Sample 10: ICV-OB1112-10 2 Initial Calibration Verification Standard
Chloride 9.84 mg/L 1.0
Sulfate 40.0 mg/L 1.0
Method: E300.0
Sample 10: ICB-OB1112-11 2 Method Blank
Chloride NO mg/L 1.0
Sulfate NO mg/L 4.0
Sample 10: LFB-OB1112-12 2 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Chloride 9.98 mg/L 1.0
Sulfate 40.1 mg/L 1.0
Sample 10: C120B0462-003AMS 2 Sample Matrix Spike
Chloride 13.3 mg/L 1.0
Sulfate 47.6 mg/L 1.0
Sample 10: C120B0462-003AMSO 2 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Chloride 13.2 mg/L 1.0
Sulfate 47.6 mg/L 1.0
Qualifiers:
Report Date: 09/05/12
Work Order: C12080469
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Analytical Run: IC1-C_120811A
08/11/1218:51
98 90 110
100 90 110
Batch: R163208
Run: IC1-C_120811A 08/11/12 19:09
Run: IC1-C_120811A 08/11/12 19:26
100 90 110
100 90 110
Run: IC1-C_120811A 08/14/12 01 :42
105 90 110
102 90 110
Run: IC1-C_120811A 08/14/12 01 :59
103 90 110 1.0 10
102 90 110 0.1 10
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 15 of 21
EN:RGY
L ABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical Exes/lsneB Sines 1952
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E353.2
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method Blank
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.42 mg/L
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.93 mg/L
Sample 10: C12080469-005CMS Sample Matrix Spike
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 3.69 mg/L
Sample 10: C12080469-005CMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 3.61 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
Report Date: 09/05/12
Work Order: C12080469
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R163181
Run: TECHNICON_120813A 08/13/12 10:48
Run: TECHNICON_120813A 08/13/12 10:51
97 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120813A 08/13/1210:53
98 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120813A 08/13/12 16:33
106 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120813A 08/13/12 16:36
102 90 110 2.2 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 16 of 21
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical Excs/lsncB Sines 1152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~illette, WY 866-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012
Analyte
Method: E900.1
Sample 10: LCS-GA-OS70
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Count Result Units
Laboratory Control Sample
15.7 pCi/L
Report Date: 09/05/12
Work Order: C12080469
RL O/OREC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1_120820B
78 80 120
Batch: GA-0580
08/30/12 21 :38
S
-LCS response is outside of the acceptance range for this analysis. Since the MS, MS, and MSD are acceptable the batch is approved.
Sample 10: MB-GA-OS70
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
3 Method Blank
-0.137
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
0.195
0.395
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
Sample 10: C12080464-002EMS Sample Matrix Spike
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 77.2 pCi/L
Sample 10: C12080464-002EMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 77.9 pCi/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1_120820B
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1_120820B
123 70 130
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1 120820B -
123 70 130 0.9
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
08/30/12 21 :38
U
08/30/12 21 :38
08/30/1221 :38
22.4
Page 17 of 21
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsllsncB Sines 1952
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~mette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 09/05/12
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012 Work Order: C12080469
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R163298
Sample 10: 081312_LCS_ 4 16 Laboratory Control Sample Run: SATURNCA_120814C 08/14/12 12:01
Acetone 110 ug/L 20 109 70 130
Benzene 10 ug/L 1.0 102 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 8.7 ug/L 1.0 87 70 130
Chloroform 9.0 ug/L 1.0 90 70 130
Chloromethane 8.3 ug/L 1.0 83 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 17 ug/L 1.0 83 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 110 ug/L 20 107 70 130
Methylene chloride 7.5 ug/L 1.0 75 70 130
Naphthalene 9.3 ug/L 1.0 93 70 130
o-Xylene 10 ug/L 1.0 104 70 130
Toluene 10 ug/L 1.0 100 70 130
Xylenes, Total 27 ug/L 1.0 90 70 130
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 93 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 92 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 93 80 130
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 102 80 120
Sample 10: 081312_MBLK_6 16 Method Blank Run: SATURNCA_120814C 08/14/1213:14
Acetone NO ug/L 20
Benzene NO ug/L 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L 1.0
Chloroform NO ug/L 1.0
Chloromethane NO ug/L 1.0
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L 1.0
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L 20
Methylene chloride NO ug/L 1.0
Naphthalene NO ug/L 1.0
o-Xylene NO ug/L 1.0
Toh.Jene NO ug/L 1.0
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L 1.0
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 91 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 89 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 90 80 120
Surr: T oluene-d8 1.0 92 80 120
Sample 10: C12080469-0050MS 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: SATURNCA_120814C 08/14/12 19:54
Acetone 100000 ug/L 10000 104 70 130
Benzene 11000 ug/L 500 111 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 10000 ug/L 500 100 70 130
Chloroform 13000 ug/L 500 109 70 130
Chloromethane 10000 ug/L 500 102 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 18000 ug/L 500 . 91 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 99000 ug/L 10000 99 70 130
Methylene chloride 8300 ug/L 500 83 70 130
Naphthalene 8700 ug/L 500 87 70 130
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 18 of 21
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsllsncB Sines 1952
Helena, MT 877 -472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 09/05/12
Project: August Monthly Groundwater 2012 Work Order: C12080469
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R 163298
Sample 10: C12080469-0050MS 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: SATURNCA_120814C 08/14/12 19:54
o-Xylene 11000 ug/L 500 111 70 130
Toluene 11000 ug/L 500 109 70 130
Xylenes, Total .29000 ug/L 500 97 70 130
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 90 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 92 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 97 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 98 80 120
Sample 10: C12080469-0050MSO 16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SATURNCA_120814C 08/14/12 20:30
Acetone 100000 ug/L 10000 105 70 130 0.8 20
Benzene 11000 ug/L 500 111 70 130 0.0 20
Carbon tetrachloride 10000 ug/L 500 100 70 130 0.8 20
Chloroform 13000 ug/L 500 104 70 130 3.8 20
Chloromethane 11000 ug/L 500 107 70 130 5.4 20
m+p-Xylenes 19000 ug/L 500 97 70 130 6.4 20
Methyl ethyl ketone 100000 ug/L 10000 101 70 130 1.6 20
Methylene chloride 8800 ug/L 500 88 70 130 6.1 20
Naphthalene 10000 ug/L 500 100 70 130 14 20
o-Xylene 11000 ug/L 500 114 70 130 2.5 20
Toluene 11000 ug/L 500 107 70 130 1.8 20
Xylenes, Total 31000 ug/L 500 102 70 130 4.9 20
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 93 80 . 120 0.0 10
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 91 70 130 0.0 10
Surr: p'~Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 95 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 97 80 120 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 19 of 21
EI'.ERGY
LABORATORIES
~J'" www.~nergylab.com ~ Analytical ExcsUsnce Sines 7952
Helena, MT 877 -472-0711 .. Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gifle~e, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, S[) 888-672-1225 . College Station, TX 888-690-2218
Standard Reporting Procedures
Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual
Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time.
Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected, data units are typically noted as -dry.
For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried and ground prior to sample analysis.
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Login completed by: Corinne Wagner
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 8/10/2012
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper containeribottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time? )
(Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters
such as pH, DO, Res CI, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.)
Temp Blank received?
ContaineriTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes D
Yes 0
'fes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
2.0'C
Yes 0
Yes 0
C12080469
Date Received: 8/10/2012
Received by: th
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
Carrier FedEx
name:
Not Present D
Not Present D
Not Present 0
Not Applicable D
No VOA vials submitted D
Not Applicable D
Page 20 of 21
EN:RGY mJ" Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record
PLEASE PRI NT lfrovide as much information _as possibfe.l
Page _1_ of _1 _
Company Nam~(1Gr ~ "F" v-el s. Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. I Sample Origin
A V\~~~+ Mo()+h~ G~rc.}l.AndlN~et State: U"'-
EPA/State Compliance:
Yes ~ No 0
Report Mail Address: pO J3.0X 80C{
51~t)dl"~ UI ~ Y5lt
Invoice Address: s.t\me ~
Special ReporVFormats:
DDW o EDD/EDT(Electronic Data) o POTVVNVWTP Format: ___ _ o State: D LEVEL IV
D Other: ----D NELAC
Contact Name:
(,."".-('; f\ f 0..\ ,.,... er
Invoice Contact & Phone:
Phone/Fax:
t435 b 7g ..2:2..2.'
D"v ~J -f",rk L\3S b 78 .:2:2:21
3: ~ W@O@ OO~@QD~rn[Q)
Cl .... ~o (I)~ ~a.l;gOI <u C ._> ° >om Bcncnro~ W c "U5(1» :r: o~= ~ 0) '" u>Ooc: ....., '0 « ~Iffil ~ «
... (Jj S c: -;;:: ../ .-: ~ Cl. col~ Cl ',::) I-E~j9 I ,C «
:::I 0)--CI.> 3: v z 15.:«1 arc V -w
E >1 .-t-: ~ w ~ 6 .... '-.J,lC/)
i-------------,-------r------t----1 t+ 0 .~ £ -s:. 4,.. oS SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION MATRIX 1 . ==
(Name, Location, Interval, etc.) \J ~
M\V-3LD~O~.2DI~ 18'/~/20)21_13)S I ~-W I~L2<J)(1 j( I I I I I If
Mw-;l'5_CgO':;tO'~ 1&/b/~11 )110 11 '-W :x
3~h"'''H ... 0&0720,2. Ig/7/;2.0j~ll l30 It ... vJ :i
M W ")4~~071.c>r2.. _ Ig/7/.z.o)::2.ll~1 1)-W x
5f4W-.l(;,_DgOg2.0\~ Ig/g/2.0\:2II33\ I&-w xiI< ~I~ X I.·
6MW---=3CLOgcn~or:t IWj/~OI:lI\D.J.S 13-w II< ~I~ )(
:N) vJ -~S_OftOg;2.0l:2. --' g/g/:tol2..1 08:35 11-W )( LX L IX IX~
Email: Sampler: (Please Print)·
--r;.nnu tio}} I;)'" if
Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
• ~I R ... -"C c: e I U ro c '-:::::I ~ 1 5 ro "C c: ~I H
Contact ELI prior to
RUSH sample submittal
for charges and
scheduling -See
I nstruction Page
Comments: ReceiPtT'tB
tlti z;c
On Ice: (jJN
Custody Seal
OnBottle ~ N On Cooler N
Intact N
Signature Y N
Match
~
!~
~
~ I~ ~.
~
I~
8M\U-b~-_O~0720tl Ig/7/2J)12i132.1 11-W [Xl .. d£cICnh~d;~ I:?a\ber -14&>/:;l. &-J l[£ (6l
"U I~if Blo..l1l5. (071./ ~ IKlfS/.:l..GJ2. ~ 10
t!P~b'J~q
(l)
I\.) ....
o -Custody I Relinquished by (prin~): DatelTime: ·Sign~ure: "'-;'n(h~r ~on,rllA.U~,.Ot2. 'DOC _}I.IA~'11' lL/J.L
Received by (print): DatelTime: Signafure:
Oate/Time:
;
Record Relinquished by (print): :oJ DatelTime: . ~~Signature: 0 ReC9ived ~ IMUSTbe~--------------------------------~~~~~~--~~------~~~~~~~~ Ime"
bv (Drint):
Signed Sample Disposal: Retur~!Q Client: Lab Disposal: .
In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to c~e the-anal;SiS r~qUeS~ed.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub·contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report.
Visit our web site at www.energylab.com for additional information, downloadable fee schedule. forms, and links.
TabF2
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
September 2012
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExCllHBfIC. Sincs '952
Hale,na, MT 877~472"D711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888 .. 235-0515
A~ille.~a, W:Y8.6~&86·7n5 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
LablD: C12090804-001
Client Sample ID: MW-11_09192012
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
130 ug/l
Qualifier RL
10
Report Date: 10/17/12
Collection Date: 09/19/12 13:45
DateReceived: 09/21/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
E200.8 10105/12 13:181 smm
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 3 of 22
M · WWN.energylab.com ~ H.elen .•• Mf 611472-0711 • Billings, Mf 801·7354489 • Casper, W'/ 888·235-0515 ~ Analytical ExCBHBilCfI Sines '952 L~ -~ill~~a, WY8~6~6B6-7175 • Rapid City, SI} 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218 EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C 12090804-002
Client Sample 10: MW-14_09182012
Report Date: 10/17/12
Collection Date: 09/18/12 14:30
DateReceived: 09/21/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
2140 ug/l
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
10 E200.8 10/05/12 13 :23 1 smm
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 22
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
Analytical Excsnsnc. Sines '152
'Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WV 888-235-0515
;~ijle,ti:Q, WY866~686-7n5 • Rapid City, SI} 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
Lab ID: C 12090804-003
Client Sample ID: MW-25_09182012
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
6.01 ug/l
Qualifier RL
0.30
Report Date: 10/17/12
Collection Date: 09/18/12 11 :55
DateReceived: 09/21/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date I By
E200.8 10105/12 12:141 smm
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 50f22
El\.ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsUsnc. Sines ,m Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800 .. 735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~flle.ttQ, Wy 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12090804-004
Client Sample ID: MW-26_09192012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
METALS -DISSOLVED
Uranium
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-dB
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
67
1.8
64.9
NO
NO
NO
2300
NO
NO
10
NO
NO
NO
104
108
111
114
0-RL increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Report Date: 10/17/12
Collection Date: 09/19/12 14:10
DateReceived: 09/21/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
0 2 E300.0 09/25/12 20:21 1 wc
0.1 E353.2 09/27/1216:08 fiji
0.30 E200.8 10105/12 12:161 smm
H 20 SW8260B 10106/12 06:501 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10106/12 06:50 1 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10106/1206:501 jlr
OH 100 SW8260B 10104/1203:141 jk
H 1.0 SW8260B 10106/12 06:501 jlr
H 20 SW8260B 10106/12 06:501 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10106/12 06:501 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10106/12 06:50 1 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10106/12 06:50 1 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10106/1206:501 jlr
H 80-120 SW8260B 10106/12 06:501 jlr
H 70-130 SW8260B 10106/12 06:501 jlr
H 80-120 SW8260B 10106/12 06:501 jlr
H 80-120 SW8260B 10106/12 06:501 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
H -Analysis performed past recommended holding time.
Page 60f22
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
Analytical ExCSnBflCi Sines 1m Helena, MT 817-472-0711 • Billings, MY 800~735-448g • Casper, W'f 888-235-0515
:~iII~tt~, wY8GS .. &86·7115 • Rapid City, SI} 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C 12090804-005
Client Sample 10: MW-30_09192012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
130
16
41.9
7.67
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/l
ug/l
ug/l
Report Date: 10/17/12
Collection Date: 09/19/12 11 :30
DateReceived: 09/21/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
E300.0 1 0/15/12 22 :41 1 wc
D 2 E353.2 09/27/12 16:11 Iljl
5.0 E200.8 10105/1213:271 smm
0.30 E200.8 10105/12 13:27 1 smm
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7of22
EN:R(iY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExCSnBflCB Sincs 7952
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
.. ;§i!leJte, WYB66-686-7175 • Rapid City, Sf} 888-&12-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12090804-006
Client Sample ID: MW-31_09182012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
172 mg/l
21 mg/l
561 mg/l
1460 mg/l
o -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Report Date: 10/17/12
Collection Date: 09/18/12 13:30
DateReceived: 09/21/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
o
o
2
4
10
E300.0
E353.2
E300.0
A2540 C
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
09/25/12 20:561 wc
09/27/1216:13/1jl
09/25/12 20:56 1 wc
09/24/12 16:051 ab
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 80f22
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExCBJIBilC. Sincs , d52
Helena, MY 871-472-071 f • Billings, MT 800 .. 735-4489 " Casper, WV 888-235-0515
'§illefte, WY86& .. 686~7n5 • Rapid City, 51) 888-672-1225 • College station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
LablD: C12090804-007
Client Sample ID: MW-35_09192012
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
. RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
283 ug/l
8.2 ug/l
0.54 ug/l
22.9 ug/l
5.4 pCi/l
0.6 pCi/l
0.2 pCi/l
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Qualifier RL
10
5.0
0.50
0.30
Report Date: 10/17/12
Collection Date: 09/19/12 09:15
DateReceived: 09/21/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.8 10105/12 13:32 I smm
E200.8 10105/12 13:32 I smm
E200.8 10105/12 13:32 I smm
E200.8 10105/12 13:32 I smm
E900.1 1 0104/12 08 :32 I Ibb
E900.1 10104/12 08:32 I Ibb
E900.1 10104/12 08:32 I Ibb
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 22
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
AnaIytiCliI Excsllsnc. Sincs '952
Helena, Mt 877-412-0711 • Billings. MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
'~i·lIe.jfe, wy 866~686~7n5 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
Lab ID: C 12090804-008
Client Sample ID: MW-65_09192012
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
273 ug/l
9.7 ug/l
NO ug/l
22.6 ug/l
6.0 pC ill
0.6 pCi/l
0.2 pCi/l
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Qualifier Rl
10
5.0
0.50
0.30
Report Date: 10/17/12
Collection Date: 09/19/12 09:15
DateReceived: 09/21/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date / By
E200.8 10105/12 13:36 1 smm
E200.8 10105/12 13:361 smm
E200.8 10105/12 13:361 smm
E200.8 10105/12 13:361 smm
E900.1 1 0104/12 08 :32 1 Ibb
E900.1 1 0104/12 08 :32 1 Ibb
E900.1 10104/12 08:321 Ibb
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 10 of 22
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExCSOIfflCB Sincs 7952
_Helena,MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, W'{ 888-235-0515
'~ille.t;ta, ¥lYSi6-G86-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
LablD: C 12090804-009
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank 6746
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
102 %REC
102 %REC
107 %REC
117 %REC
H -Analysis performed past recommended holding time.
Report Date: 10/17/12
Collection Date: 09/19/12
DateReceived: 09/21/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
H 20 SW8260B 10105/12 16:221 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10105/12 16:221 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10105/12 16 :22 1 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10105/12 16 :22 1 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10105/12 16:221 jlr
H 20 SW8260B 10105/12 16:22 1 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10105/12 16:22 1 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10105/12 16:221 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10105/12 16:221 jlr
H 1.0 SW8260B 10105/12 16:221 jlr
H 80-120 SW8260B 10/05/12 16:22/ jlr
H 70-130 SW8260B 10/05/12 16:22/ jlr
H 80-120 SW8260B 10/05/12 16:22/ jlr
H 80-120 SW8260B 10/05/12 16:22/ jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 11 of 22
EI\ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsHBfIC' Sines J952
Helena, MY 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WV 888-235-0515
~il,Ie.#e, WY866~686~7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
Lab 10: C12090804-010
Client Sample ID: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
2.0
Qualifier RL
Report Date: 10/17/12
Collection Date: 09/20/12
DateReceived: 09/21/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
E170.1 09/21/1209:30/ kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 12 of 22
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical Extsllsnl:s SiOCll 1952
Helena,. MT 877 .. 472 .. 0711 • Billings, MT 800 .. 735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~iO~#e, WY~8.6 .. 686 .. 7175 • Rapid City, SI} 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690 .. 2218
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
October 17, 2012
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C12090804 Quote ID: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 10 samples for Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc on 9/21/2012
for analysis.
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C12090804-001 MW-11_09192012 09/19/1213:45 09/21/12 Aqueous Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
C 12090804-002 MW-14_09182012 09/18/12 14:30 09/21/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12090804-003 MW-25_09182012 09/18/12 11 :55 09/21/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12090804-004 MW-26_09192012 09/19/1214:10 09/21/12 Aqueous E300.0 Anions
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C 12090804-005 MW-30_09192012 09/19/12 11 :30 09/21/12 Aqueous E300.0 Anions
Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
C12090804-006 MW -31_09182012 09/18/12 13:30 09/21/12 Aqueous E300.0 Anions
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Solids, Total Dissolved
C12090804-007 MW-35_09192012 09/19/12 9:15 09/21/12 Aqueous Metals by ICP-MS, Dissolved
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
C12090804-008 MW-65_09192012 09/19/12 9:15 09/21/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12090804-009 Trip Blank 6746 09/19/12 0:00 09/21/12 Aqueous SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C12090804-010 Temp Blank 09/20/12 0:00 09/21/12 Aqueous Temperature
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. The analyses presented in this report were
performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601, unless otherwise noted.
Radiochemistry analyses were performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2325 Kerzell Lane, Casper, WY 82601,
unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical
Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By: cS¥~ D LJtA1~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2012.10.17 14:06:51 -06:00
Page 1 of 22
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExC81fsnCB Sim;s 1852
Helena, MT 877 .. 472 .. 0711 • Billings, MT 800 .. 735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
-~·illette,WY866 .. 686-7175 • Ra id City, so 888-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
CLIENT: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012 Report Date: 10/17/12
Sample Delivery Group: C12090804 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4CC (±2CC)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for
seven individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are NO (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria
for PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize
its branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SO
eli-cs -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001, Radiochemical WY200002; Utah: WY00002; Washington: C836
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 22
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
Analytical Excslillflca Sines 1952
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888 .. 235-0515
.~illettl!, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SI) 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2540 C
Sample 10: MB-1_120924A Method Blank
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-2_120924A Laboratory Control Sample
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 990 mg/L
Sample 10: C12090797-011A OUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 349 mg/L
Sample 10: C12090797-012A MS Sample Matrix Spike
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 1210 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL
10
10
10
10
Report Date: 10/17/12
Work Order: C12090804
O/OREC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: TDS 120924A
Run: BAL-1_120924B 09/24/12 15:39
Run: BAL-1_120924B 09/24/12 15:40
99 90 110
Run: BAL-1 120924B 09/24/12 16:04
1.7 5
Run: BAL-1_120924B 09/24/12 16:04
97 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 13 of 22
EI'.ERGY www.energyJab.com ~ Helena, MlB77-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515 ) ...... ~_~::L. .~illett-e, WY .&& ... 686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, lX 888-690-2218 LABORATORIES Analyt/csl ExCIII/enc, SinClI '952
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
Report Date: 10/17/12
Work Order: C 12090804
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: ICV
Uranium
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB
Uranium
Sample 10: LFB
Uranium
Sample 10: C12090801-0040MS
Uranium
Sample 10: C12090801-0040MSO
Uranium
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: ICV
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Sample 10: LFB
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Sample 10: C12090617-003BMS4
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Sample 10: C12090617-003BMSO
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
4
4
4
4
4
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Analytical Run: ICPMS2-C _121 005A
Initial Calibration Verification Standard 10/05/12 11 :51
0.0537 mg/L 0.00030 107 90 110
Batch: R 165485
Method Blank Run: ICPMS2-C_121005A 10/05/12 12:05
NO mg/L 0.00030
Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS2-C_121005A 10/05/1212:06
0.0519 mg/L 0.00030 104 85 115
Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS2-C_121005A 10/05/12 15:35
0.0784 mg/L 0.00030 109 70 130
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS2-C_121005A 10/05/12 15:37
0.0778 mg/L 0.00030 108 70 130 0.9 20
Analytical Run: ICPMS4-C_121005A
Initial Calibration Verification Standard 10/05/12 12:30
0.0496 mg/L 0.0010 99 90 110
0.0514 mg/L 0.0010 103 90 110
0.0503 mg/L 0.0010 101 90 110
0.0503 mg/L 0.00030 101 90 110
Batch: R165489
Method Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_121005A 10/05/12 13:05
NO mg/L 0.010
NO mg/L 0.0050
NO mg/L 0.00050
NO mg/L 0.00030
Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_121005A 10/05/12 13:10
0.0518 mg/L 0.0010 104 85 115
0.0527 mg/L 0.0010 105 85 115
0.0514 mg/L 0.0010 103 85 115
0.0514 mg/L 0.00030 102 85 115
Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS4-C_121005A 10/05/12 18:52
0.0855 mg/L 0.0010 93 70 130
0.0447 mg/L 0.0010 89 70 130
0.0534 mg/L 0.00050 107 70 130
0.0565 mg/L 0.00030 111 70 130
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS4-C_121005A 10/05/12 18:56
0.0827 mg/L 0.0010 87 70 130 3.3 20
0.0446 mg/L 0.0010 89 70 130 0.3 20
0.0525 mg/L 0.00050 105 70 130 1.9 20
0.0552 mg/L 0.00030 108 70 130 2.2 20
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 14 of 22
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExCSI/snCII Sines 1952 f Helena, MTB77-472-D711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~illet:t~, 'NY 8&6-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
Report Date: 10/17/12
Work Order: C12090804
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Method: E300.0
Sample 10: ICV-092412-10
Chloride
Sulfate
Method: E300.0
Sample 10: ICB-092412-11
Chloride
Sulfate
Sample 10: LFB-092412-13
Chloride
Sulfate
Sample 10: LFBO-092412-14
Chloride
Sulfate
Sample 10: C12090797-012AMS
Chloride
Sulfate
Sample 10: C12090797-012AMSO
Chloride
Sulfate
Method: E300.0
Sample 10: ICV
Chloride
Method: E300.0
Sample 10: ICB
Chloride
Sample 10: LFB
Chloride
Sample 10: C12100562-001AMS
Chloride
Sample 10: C12100562-001AMSO
Chloride
2 Initial Calibration Verification Standard
9.74 mg/L 1.0
40.3 mg/L 1.0
2 Method Blank
ND mg/L 1.0
ND mg/L 4.0
2 Laboratory Fortified Blank
9.65 mg/L 1.0
39.8 mg/L 1.0
2 Laboratory Fortified Blank Duplicate
9.64 mg/L 1.0
39.7 mg/L 1.0
2 Sample Matrix Spike
11.4 mg/L 1.0
58.8 mg/L 1.0
2 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
11.8 mg/L 1.0
60.4 mg/L 1.0
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
9.99 mg/L 1.0
Method Blank
ND mg/L 1.0
Laboratory Fortified Blank
10.0 mg/L 1.0
Sample Matrix Spike
26.2 mg/L 1.0
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
26.3 mg/L 1.0
97
101
97
100
96
99
99
101
103
106
100
100
98
99
90
90
110
110
Run: IC2-C_120924B
Run: IC2-C_120924B
90 110
90 110
Run: IC2-C_120924B
90 110
90 110
Run: IC2-C_120924B
90 110
90 110
Run: IC2-C_120924B
90 110
90 110
90 110
Run: IC2-C_121015A
Run: IC2-C_121015A
90 110
Run: IC2-C_121015A
90 110
Run: IC2-C 121015A -
90 110
RPO RPOLimit Qual
Analytical Run: IC2-C_120924B
09/24/12 17:03
3.3
2.7
Batch: R 165020
09/24/12 17:21
09/24/12 17:56
09/24/12 18:13
09/25/12 19:29
09/25/12 19:46
10
10
Analytical Run: IC2-C_121 015A
10/15/12 12:09
Batch: R 165865
10/15/12 12:25
10/15/12 12:40
10/15/12 23:59
10/16/12 00:14
0.4 10
-------------_._-----------_._-------------_._-----------------------------------------------
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 15 of 22
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com ~Helena.MT877-472-0711 .Billings.MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WV 888-235-0515
AnaIyticaIExcsllsncBSincs1952 L .'1.,;:i .:§ille,:te, %.'.866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E353.2
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method Blank
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.56 mg/L
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.01 mg/L
Sample 10: C12090797-0090MS Sample Matrix Spike
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 36.5 mg/L
-Matrix spike recoveries outside the acceptance range are considered matrix-related.
Sample 10: C12090797-0090MSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 35.8 mg/L
-Matrix spike recoveries outside the acceptance range are considered matrix-related.
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limi!.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 10/17/12
Work Order: C 12090804
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R165111
Run: TECHNICON_120927A 09/27/12 11 :36
0.10
Run: TECHNICON_120927A 09/27/12 11 :38
0.10 102 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120927A 09/27/12 11 :41
0.10 102 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_120927A 09/27/1215:56
1.0 116 90 110 S
Run: TECHNICON_120927A 09/27/12 15:58
1.0 113 90 110 1.9 10 S
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Page 16 of 22
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
~ ___ I
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsUSflca Sines 1952
Helena, MTB77-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~illette, WY 866-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E900.1
Sample 10: LCS-GA-0587
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: MB-GA-0587
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Laboratory Control Sample
19.4 pCi/L
3 Method Blank
0.141
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 0.312
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 0.497
Sample 10: C12090790-0020MS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: C12090790-0020MSO
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Sample Matrix Spike
42.9 pCi/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
40.5 pCi/L
Report Date: 10/17/12
Work Order: C12090804
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Run: BERTHOLD 770-2_120927A
93 80 120
Run: BERTHOLD 770-2_120927 A
Run: BERTHOLD 770-2_120927A
105 70 130
Run: BERTHOLD 770-2_120927A
96 70 130 5.7
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Batch: GA-0599
10104/1206:56
10104/12 06:56
U
10104/12 06:56
10104/12 06:56
25.5
Page 17 of 22
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
AnalyticalExcsllBflcB Sines '.952
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
.·~iil~~~, 'NY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 10/17/12
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012 Work Order: C12090804
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R165488
Sample 10: 05-0ct-12_LCS_ 4 15 Laboratory Control Sample Run: GCMS2_121 005A 10/05/12 14:04
Benzene 11 ug/L 1.0 109 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 11 ug/L 1.0 110 70 130
Chloroform 10 ug/L 1.0 103 70 130
Chloromethane 12 ug/L 1.0 122 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 21 ug/L 1.0 105 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 80 ug/L 20 80 70 130
Methylene chloride 9.6 ug/L 1.0 96 70 130
Naphthalene 11 ug/L 1.0 112 70 130
o-Xylene 11 ug/L 1.0 111 70 130
Toluene 11 ug/L 1.0 115 70 130
Xylenes, Total 32 ug/L 1.0 107 70 130
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 96 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 97 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 98 80 130
Surr: T 0luene-d8 1.0 113 80 120
Sample 10: 05-0ct-12_MBLK_6 15 Method Blank Run: GCMS2_121005A 10/05/12 15:13
Benzene NO ug/L 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L 1.0
Chloroform NO ug/L 1.0
Chloromethane NO ug/L 1.0
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L 1.0
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L 20
Methylene chloride NO ug/L 1.0
Naphthalene NO ug/L 1.0
o-Xylene NO ug/L 1.0
Toluene NO ug/L 1.0
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L 1.0
Surr: 1 ,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 103 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 95 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 106 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 118 80 120
Sample 10: C12090918-004AMS 15 Sample Matrix Spike Run: GCMS2 -121005A 10/05/12 21 :00
Benzene 220 ug/L 10 108 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 230 ug/L 10 114 70 130
Chloroform 210 ug/L 10 107 70 130
Chloromethane 220 ug/L 10 110 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 400 ug/L 10 101 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 1600 ug/L 200 78 70 130
Methylene chloride 200 ug/L 10 98 70 130
Naphthalene 200 ug/L 10 100 70 130
o-Xylene 210 ug/L 10 107 70 130
Toluene 240 ug/L 10 118 70 130
Xylenes, Total 620 ug/L 10 103 70 130
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 18 of 22
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
Analytical ExcsllsncB SInes '952
Helena, MT 877'-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~Gillet,i:e, Wv 866 .. 686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • Coilege Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 10/17/12
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012 Work Order: C12090804
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R 165488
Sample 10: C12090918-004AMS 15 Sample Matrix Spike Run: GCMS2_121 005A 10/05/12 21 :00
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 97 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 102 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 98 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 115 80 120
Sample 10: C12090918-004AMSO 15 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: GCMS2 -121005A 10/05/1221 :35
Benzene 220 ug/L 10 110 70 130 2.2 20
Carbon tetrachloride 230 ug/L 10 115 70 130 0.7 20
Chloroform 220 ug/L 10 109 70 130 1.5 20
Chloromethane 230 ug/L 10 116 70 130 5.3 20
m+p-Xylenes 400 ug/L 10 101 70 130 0.2 20
Methyl ethyl ketone 1600 ug/L 200 79 70 130 2.0 20
Methylene chloride 200 ug/L 10 101 70 130 3.2 20
Naphthalene 240 ug/L 10 119 70 130 18 20
o-Xylene 220 ug/L 10 108 70 130 0.7 20
Toluene j 240 ug/L 10 118 70 130 0.3 20
Xylenes, Total 620 ug/L 10 103 70 130 0.4 20
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 98 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 98 70 130 0.0 10
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 100 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 112 80 120 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 19 of 22
EI'.ERGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical Excs/lsncB Sinu 1952
Helena, MlB77-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WV 888-235-0515
,:ijIlJe#Bc, wx ,866 .. 686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc Report Date: 10/17/12
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2012 Work Order: C12090804
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R165644
Sample 10: 100312_LCS_11 5 Laboratory Control Sample Run: SATURNCA_121003B 10103/12 23:02
Chloroform 10 ug/L 1.0 105 70 130
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 100 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 106 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 102 80 130
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 102 80 120
Sample 10: 100312_MBLK_19 5 Method Blank Run: SATURNCA_121003B 10104/1200:14
Chloroform ND ug/L 1.0
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 98 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 108 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 96 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 99 80 120
Sample 10: C12090804-0040MS 5 Sample Matrix Spike Run: SATURNCA_121003B 10104/1203:50
Chloroform 4200 ug/L 100 96 70 130
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 106 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 113 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 107 80 120
Surr: T 0luene-d8 1.0 100 80 120
Sample 10: C12090804-0040MSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SATURNCA_121003B 10104/12 04:26
Chloroform 4400 ug/L 100 106 70 130 4.6 20
Surr: 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 98 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 111 70 130 0.0 10
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 98 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 103 80 120 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 20 of 22
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExCS08llCf SInes '.852
Helen,a; MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 808-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
:9i11~!f~;WY8.6-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
Standard Reporting Procedures
Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual
Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time.
Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected, data units are typically noted as -dry.
For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried and ground prior to sample analysis.
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
Login completed by: Kerri Schroeder
Reviewed by: BL2000\smead
Reviewed Date: 9/24/2012
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
(Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters
such as pH, DO, Res CI, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.)
Temp Blank received?
ContainerlTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes III
Yes III
Yes 0
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
2.0'C
Yes III
Yes III
C12090804
Date Received: 9/21/2012
Received by: ks
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No D
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
Carrier NDA
name:
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
Not Present III
Not Applicable 0
No VOA vials submitted 0
Not Applicable 0
Page 21 of 22
"U Dl co CD
N N
Q,
N N
EI\ERGY mJ-Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record Page_l_of_' _
----------- ------------" Company Name: Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. ~t:l Sample Origin EPNState Compliance:
'Ener~~ 1=~e.\S S~p+e.mber M,on+~~ G-roV\nd lAJ~ter State: l..tT Yes ~ No 0
Report Mail Address: 1'0 BO)C 80,\ Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
&\"-t1a;n~ ~T £<LlS\I G-t;\.-rr\ 1\ ? ~ me. J4~5 b78 .22J..1 "1::n n er J.j" JJ /JII,1
Invoice Address;-l Invoice Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order: -S~'rv1~ P~\)i~ lv.r1( L\3!) b 18 .2.2~J
Special Report/Formats: $: ~&lb W®D® OO~®QD~~[Q) .. Contact ELI prior to It;lJo, ,l/bI o .... RUSH sample submittal .
~O(l)~ [ for charges and Cooler 10(s): '
~(O~OI t C R scheduling -See V/;'tY!i-._> 0 >.15
D OW D EOD/EOT(Electronic Data) ~(/)~ m $: w I nstruction Page
a$:= ~ Ol .\1 e J: -0 Receipt Tamp D POTWMlWTP Format: ~~ () t: Comments: ~«~I-g~ ::l U ~,~<T!3 0c o State: D LEVEL IV
o .... (01 C -S. « e .... i:ti$§·c ~. -:1; ~ .... ro t: o Other: D NELAC ~ a.cul~ 0 ~ ,.,.. .... r-On Ice: (1)N E~ro I ~ ~ -~C f « ::J
::J (\).~ Q) $: l-S Zo..«1 arc S::"3 .,.-4 ~ ~ (W "E Custody Seal ~ >1 ~~. _.\1 ..... ,_ '$ W ro ~& •• (jN -0 en s: S;1 ~~:E 1f1~~1 c: On Cooler Y N ro
C ~-I-..2.£: .. ~A~ en H Intact Y N
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection MATRIX ~ ~ ~ -;5 '\J") 'f. Signature N
(Name, Location, Interval, etc.) Date Time Match
1 )-w '" ~ MW"'lt.O'1IC{;lOI2 1'1114/1:1 l~LiS I~
2AvJ -)Lt_Qq tS<2!)\-:t Iq/IYl2 lL-l ~O . \.-YJ X ~ c~
3~W-;l.5_0q '~.2.0'2 ' q/If~/l~ )15~ i ~ W\J ~ (Q)
Innn
lAW-~~q }qtJ.Dl:L. 9/j~/lJ. )'iIO b-W 1-. I~ y.. X ~
5 /ttw-3tJ. Oqlq~12 Iq /)'\/l:t lj'~ ~-W y.. X i.. ~ I~
~
6MvJ -3)_ Dt1I!20\::l. q IJtJ/ll. 1~-;O ~-vJ " 1-"X I~ ~
7"'W-~_Oq,q2.0a. I~ IIq/l~ OQI.5 )-w 'X ~ X I~ I~ ~
8MW-b5_ D'lt12£>I:l. qllq/IA IO~'~ ,-w )( )( )( X X ~
~~'C '&)4.nk (.11'4' 1'1llq~:t I~ I::?
101( ~o1?1&lll ~J~~2t?d-~ I~
Custotty h!;:~bU;\f;~l1 q/~/~i2 JlOtl .:-\ Signatureu b·/ Received by (print): Datemme: Signa ure:
Record hA~1fl I \ I
Relinquished by (print): '-l DatefTime: Signature: .-.J Received by (print): Datemme: Signature: 1 MUST be ~ ~ ~
Signed P;;:ZJ1I'I};7});A4-Uqpj J/~ tJ~:3() Sign8fure: Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal:
I " /
In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report.
Visit our web site at www.energylab.com for additional information. downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
TabG
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
G-1A: Routine Field Data QNQC Evaluation
,
Time Req'd for 2 Time Pumped Amount
Well Sample Date . Casings (min) Sufficient? Conductance RPD(%) pH RPD(%) Temll CC) RPD(%) Redox Potential (Eh) RPD(%) . Turbidity (NTU)
MW-2 7116/2012 114.16 120 Y 3735 3732 0.08 7.24 7.23 0.14 15.55 15.52 0.19 300 293 2.36 0 0
MW-3 7118/2012 48.69 75 Y 5685 5690 0.09 6.99 6.99 0.00 16.17 16.19 0.12 308 305 0.98 0 0
MW-3A 7119/2012 61.84 65 Pumped dry 5960 5978 0.30 7.07 7.01 0.85 16.52 16.41 0.67 336 330~ 1.80 0 0.9
MW-5 7/16/2012 192.71 200 Y 2937 2941 0.14 7.59 7.6 0.13 16.3 16.26 0.25 163 160 . 1.86 1.6 1.6
MW-11 7/1112012 252.05 275 Y 2800.0 2846.0 1.63 7.76 7.74 0.26 17.03 17.00 0.18 99 97 2.04 0 0
MW-12 7/1712012 132.10 135 Y 4178 4171 0.17 6.99 6.98 0.14 16.08 16.09 0.06 302 298 1.33 11.8 11.6
MW-14 7/11/2012 149.25 180 Y 3935 3928 0.18 6.89 6.89 0.00 15.61 15.60 0.06 218 217 0.46 0 0
MW-15 7/17/2012 183.86 185 Y 4286 4294 0.19 7.05 7.05 0.00 15.46 15.52 0.39 254 252 0.79 0 0
MW-18 7118/2012 384.57 390 Y 3471 3469 0.06 6.64 6.64 0.00 15.94 15.98 0.25 210 207 1.44 2.4 2.4
MW-19 7/19/2012 575.66 598 Y 1782 1782 0.00 7.20 7.21 0.14 14.77 14.85 0.54 310 306 1.30 0 0
MW-23 7/17/2012 130.91 135 Pumped dry 3856 3861 0.13 7.08 7.10 0.28 17.78 18.21 2.39 336 318. 5.50 4.2 4.9
MW-24 7118/2012 38.33 40 Pumped dry 4405 4412 0.16 6.55 6.45 1.54 16.55 16.35 1.22 314 300! 4.56 0.2 0.3
MW-25 7/10/2012 248.26 275 Y 3217 3222 0.16 6.88 6.88 0.00 15.80 15.79 0.06 345 335 2.94 11.7 11.8
MW-26 711112012 Continuously pumped well 3445 NC 7.10 NC 16.20 NC 183 NC 0
MW-26 Resample 8/1612012 Continuously pumped well 3425 NC 6.80 NC 14.95 NC 154 NC 0
MW-27 7/16/2012 262.70 270 Y 1580 1578 0.13 7.40 7.40 0.00 15.02 15 .01 0.07 302 299 1.00 0 0
MW-28 7/16/2012 201.19 210 Y 3965 3970 0.13 6.38 6.38 0.00 15.18 15.17 0.07 358 352 1.69 0 0
MW-28 Resample 8/112012 200.65 230 Y 3944 3939 0.13 5.80 5.81 0.17 15.75 15.72 0.19 316 312 1.27 0 0
MW-29 7/1012012 149.49 150 Y 4598 4620 0.48 6.68 6.68 0.00 16.45 16.41 0.24 182 181 0.55 21.2 21.5
MW-29 Resample 81112012 149.73 160 Y 4578 4585 0.15 6.44 6.45 0.16 15.97 15.89 0.50 192 190 1.05 14.1 14.2
MW-30 7110/2012 204.32 205 Y 2054 2062 0.39 7.25 7.25 0.00 15.50 15.53 0.19 238 235 1.27 0 0
MW-31 7/9/2012 372.54 375 Y 1923 1921 0.10 7.53 7.53 0.00 15.30 15.27 0.20 249 243 2.44 0 0
MW-32 7/9/2012 347.56 360 Y 3906 3910 0.10 6.74 6.72 0.30 15.18 15.19 0.07 184 184 0.00 6.7 6.9
MW-35 7110/2012 72.82 80 Y 4117 4023 2.31 6.87 6.87 0.00 16.94 16.89 0.30 200 198 1.01 0 0
MW-36 7/11/2012 66.50 85 Y 4960 4963 0.06 7.20 7.20 0.00 15.60 15.61 0.06 382 377 1.32 0 0
MW-37 7/3012012 NA 4488 4497 0.20 6.96 6.90 0.87 21.10 19.80 6.36 280 259\ 7.79 4.9 24.5
ifhe QAP states that turbidity should be less than 5 Nephelometric Turbidity .Units ("NTU") prior to sampling unless the well is characterized bywater that has a higher turbidity. The QAP does not require thatturbidity measurements be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such, the noted
observations regarding turbidity measurements less than 5 NTU are included for information purposes only.
MW-26 IS a contmuously pumped well. Per the QAP, only one set of parameters are required to be collected from continuously pumped wells.
ell was Qurged Qry.
N I A = The amount of water in the well was insufficient to pump. The pump was not able to operate due to the minimal amount of water. The well was purged and sampled with a bailer.
NC = Not calculated.
>5NTU RPD(%)
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 200.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
Y NC
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 15.38
N 40.00
Y 0.85
N NC
N NC
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
Y 1.41
Y 0.71
N 0.00
N 0.00
Y 2.94
N 0.00
N 0.00
Y 133.33
RPD >10%. Per the revised QAP Revision 7.2, Attachment 2-3, when a well is purged to dryness, only pH, temperature and specific conductance parameters are required to be within 10% RPD. Redox potential and turbidity paramters are measured for information purposes only and as such are not required to meet the
10% RPD criteria used for pH, specific conductance and temperature ..
G-IB: Acelerated Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
Time Req'd for 2 Time Pumped Amount
Well Sample Date Casings (min) Sufficient? Conductance RPD(%) pH
Accelerated January Monthly
MW-ll 817/2012 252.5 260 Y 2876 2883 0.24 7.42 7.43
MW-14 817/2012 149.5 161 Y 3892 3883 0.23 6.54 6.58
MW-25 8/6/2012 251.4 255 Y 3221 3226 0.16 6.52 6.55
MW-26 8/8/2012 Continuously pumped well 3136 NC 6.6
MW-30 817/2012 204.7 215 Y 2057 2054 0.15 6.92 6.95
MW-31 8/6/2012 372.3 395 Y 1925 1927 0.10 6.95 6.96
MW-35 8/8/2012 73.1 105 Y 4154 4145 0.22 6.74 6.74
Accelerated March Monthly
MW-ll 9119/2012 253.1 255 Y 2876 2881 0.17 7.96
MW-14 9118/2012 149.3 150 Y 3929 3928 0.03 7.10
MW-25 9/18/2012 249.2 265 Y 3235 3225 0.31 6.56
MW-26 9119/2012 Continuously pumped well 3418 NC 7.40
MW-30 9/19/2012 205.5 225 Y 2066 2069 0.15 7.91
MW-31 9/18/2012 373.1 375 Y 1946 1939 0.36 7.10
MW-35 9/19/2012 73.2 80 Y 4166 4172 0.14 6.80
.. .. " " The QAP states that turbIdity should be less than 5 NephelometrIC TurbIdIty Umts ( NTU ) prIor to samplIng unless the well IS characterIzed by water that has a
'higher turbidity. The QAP does not require that turbidity measurements be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such, the noted observations regarding turbidity
measurements less than 5 NTU are included for information purposes only.
MW-26 is a continuously pumped well.
7.91
7.08
6.54
7.85
7.10
6.81
RPD(%) Temp rC) RPD(%) Redox Potential (Eh) RPD(%) Turbidity (NTU) .<5 (NTU) RPD(%)
0.13 16.02 16.27 1.55 134 127 5.36 0 0 y 0.00
0.61 16.07 16.01 0.37 370 359 3.02 0 0 y 0.00
0.46 15.78 15.79 0.06 347 337 2.92 3.0 3.1 Y 3.28
NC 15.71 NC 125 NC 0 Y NC
0.43 15.39 15.38 0.06 313 304 2.92 0 0 y 0.00
0.14 15.90 15.88 0.13 305 295 3.33 2.4 2.4 Y 0.00
0.00 15.15 15.13 0.13 263 251 4.67 0 0 y 0.00
0.63 15.33 15.34 0.07 74 72 2.74 0 0 y 0.00
0.28 15.14 15.20 0.40 80 79 1.26 0 0 y 0.00
0.31 15.00 14.99 0.07 251 253 0.00 0.7 0.7 Y 0.00
NC 15.91 NC 151 NC 1.0 Y NC
0.76 15.31 15.30 0.07 191 196 2.58 0 0 y 0.00
0.00 14.93 14.91 0.13 247 248 0.40 8.9 8.9 N 0.00
0.15 14.60 14.60 0.00 165 165 0.00 0.7 0.7 Y 0.00
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
':, <:<" :,'
, -<, " e, , ,
QAPHolding MW-2 MW-3 MW-3A ' Mw-5
Constituent Time 7116/20i2 7/18/2012 711912012 7/16/2012
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days --------
Acetone 14 days --------
Ammonia (as N) 28 days --------
Arsenic 6 months --------
Benzene 14 days --------
Beryllium 6 months --------
Cadmium 6 months --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days --------
Chloride (mgIL) 28 days --------
Chloroform 14 days --------
Chloromethane 14 days --------
Chromium 6 months --------
Cobalt 6 months --------
Copper 6 months --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days --------
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days --5 days ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months 16 days ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months 16 days ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 16 days ------
Iron 6 months --------
Lab pH (S.u.) ----------
Lead 6 months --------
Manganese 6 months --------
Mercury 28 days --------
Molybdenum 6 months --------
Naphthalene 14 days --------
Nickel 6 months --------
Nitrate +<Nitrite (as N) 28 days --------
Selenium 6 months --18 days 25 days --
Silver 6 months --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days ----6 days --
TDS (mg/L) 7 days ----4 days --
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days --------
Thallium 6 months --------
Tin 6 months --------
Toluene 14 days --------
Uranium 6 months ------20 days
Vanadium 6 months --------
Xylenes (total) 14 days --------
Zinc 6 months --------
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ----------
Anions BALANCE-W ----------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days --------
Calcium 6 months --------
Carbonate as C03 14 days --------
Cations BALANCE-W ----------
Magnesium 6 months --------
Potassium 6 months --------
Sodium 6 months --------
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
QAPHolding MW-ll MW-12 MW-14 MW-IS
Constituent Time 7/11/2012 7117/2012 ·7/11/2012 7117/2012
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 13 days --13 days --
Acetone 14 days 13 days --13 days --
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 6 days --6 days --
Arsenic 6 months 14 days --14 days --
Benzene 14 days 13 days --13 days --
Beryllium 6 months 21 days --21 days --
Cadmium 6 months 14 days --14 days --
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 13 days --13 days --
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 8 days --8 days --
Chloroform 14 days 13 days --13 days --
Chloromethane 14 days 13 days --13 days --
Chromium 6 months 14 days --14 days --
Cobalt 6 months 14 days --14 days --
Copper 6 months 14 days --14 days --
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days 13 days --13 days --
Fluoride (MgIL) 28 days 2 days --2 days --
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months 28 days --28 days --
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months 28 days --28 days --
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 28 days --28 days --
Iron 6 months 7 days --7 days 6 days
Lab pH (S.U.) --2 days --2 days --
Lead 6 months 14 days --14 days --
Manganese 6 months 14 days --14 days --
Mercury 28 days 21 days --21 days --
Molybdenum 6 months 14 days --14 days --
Naphthalene 14 days 13 days --13 days --
Nickel 6 months 14 days --14 days --
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 5 days --5 days --
Selenium 6 months 14 days 19 days 14 days 19 days
Silver 6 months 14 days --.14 days --
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 9 days --9 days --
TDS (mgIL) 7 days 2 days --2 days --
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 2 days --2 days --
Thallium 6 months 14 days --14 days --
Tin 6 months 1 days --I days --
Toluene 14 days 13 days --13 days --
Uranium 6 months 14 days --14 days --
Vanadium 6 months 14 days --14 days --
Xylenes (total) 14 days 13 days --13 days --
Zinc 6 months 14 days --14 days --
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W --28 days --28 days --
Anions BALANCE-W --28 days --28 days --
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days 2 days --2 days --
Calcium 6 months 7 days --7 days --
Carbonate as C03 14 days 2 days --2 days --
Cations BALANCE-W --28 days --28 days --
Magnesium 6 months 7 days --7 days --
Potassium 6 months 7 days --7 days --
Sodium 6 months 7 days --7 days --
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation . , ." , -
, ~ QAP Holding. MW-18 MW-19 MW-23 MW-24
Constituent Time 7/18/2012 7119/2012 7117/2012 7118/2012
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days --------
Acetone' 14 days --------
Ammonia (as N) 28 days --------
Arsenic 6 months ------
Benzene 14 days --------
Beryllium 6 months --------
Cadmium 6 months ------18 days
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days --------
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days --------
ChlQroform 14 days --------
Chloromethane 14 days --------
Chromium 6 months --------
Cobalt 6 months --------
Copper 6 months --------
Oichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days --------
Fluoride (MglL) 28 days --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC 6 months --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months --------
Iron 6 months --------
Lab pH (S.U.) ----------
Lead 6 months --------
Manganese 6 months ----24 days --
Mercury 28 days --------
Molybdenum 6 months --------
Naphthalene 14 days --------
Nickel 6 months --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days --6 days ----
Selenium 6 months --------
Silver 6 months --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 7 days ------
TOS (mgIL) 7 days 5 days ------
Tetrah ydrofuran 14 days --------
Thallium 6 months 18 days ----20 days
Tin 6 months --------
Toluene 14 days --------
Uranium 6 months --------
Vanadium 6 months --------
Xylenes (total) 14 days --------
Zinc 6 months --------
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ----------
Anions BALANCE-W ----------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days --------
Calcium 6 months --------
Carbonate as C03 14 days ------. --
Cations BALANCE-W ----------
Magnesium 6 months --------
Potassium 6 months --------
Sodium 6 months --------
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
.J .1 \
QAPHolding MW-2S MW-26 MW-26 . MW-27
. Constituent Time 7110/2012 7ill/2012 8/16/2012 7/16/2012
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 10 days --6 days --
Acetone 14 days 10 days --6 days --
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 7 days 6 days ----
Arsenic 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
Benzene 14 days 10 days --6 days --
Beryllium 6 months 22 days 21 days ----
Cadmium 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 10 days --6 days --
Chloride (mglL) 28 days 9 days 8 days --9 days
Chloroform 14 days 10 days --13 days --
Chloromethane 14 days 10 days --6 days --
Chromium 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
Cobalt 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
Copper 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days 10 days --6 days --
Fluoride (MglL) 28 days 3 days 2 days ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months 29 days 28 days --16 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months 29 days 28 days --16 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 29 days 28 days --16 days
Iron 6 months 8 days 7 days ----
Lab pH (S.u.) . --3 days 2 days ----
Lead 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
Manganese 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
Mercury 28 days 22 days 21 days ----
Molybdenum 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
Naphthalene 14 days 10 days --6 days --
Nickel 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 6 days 5 days --9 days
Selenium 6 months 15 days 21 days ----
Silver 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
Sulfate (mgIL) 28 days 10 days 9 days --9 days
TDS (mgIL) 7 days 3 days 2 days --7 days
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 3 days 2 days ----
Thallium 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
Tin 6 months 2 days 1 days ----
Toluene 14 days 10 days --6 days --
Uranium 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
Vanadium 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
Xylenes (total) 14 days 10 days --6 days --
Zinc 6 months 15 days 14 days ----
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W --29 days 28 days ----
Anions BALANCE-W --29 days 28 days ----
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days -3 days 2 days ----
Calcium 6 months 8 days 8 days ----
Carbonate as C03 14 days 3 days 2 days ----
Cations BALANCE-W --29 days 28 days ----
Magnesium 6 months 8 days 7 days ----
Potassium 6 months 8 days 7 days ----
Sodium 6 months 8 days 7 days ----
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
, -.
QAPHolding MW-28 MW-28 MW-29 MW~29
Constituent Time 7116/2012 8/112012 7110/2012 8/112012
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days --------
Acetone 14 days --------
Ammonia (as N) 28 days --------
Arsenic 6 months --------
Benzene 14 days --------
Beryllium 6 months --------
Cadmium 6 months --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days --------
Chloride (mgIL) 28 days 11 days ------
Chloroform 14 days --------
Chloromethane 14 days --------
Chromium 6 months --------
Cobalt 6 months --------
Copper 6 months --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days --------
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months --------
Iron 6 months ----6 days --
Lab pH (S.u.) ----------
Lead 6 months --------
Manganese 6 months --19 days --19 days
Mercury 28 days --------
Molybdenum 6 months --------
Naphthalene 14 days --------
Nickel 6 months --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days --------
Seleniuni 6 months --------
Silver 6 months --------
Sulfate (mgIL) 28 days --------
TDS (mgIL) 7 days ------5 days
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days --------
Thallium 6 months --------
Tin 6 months --------
Toluene 14 days --------
Uranium 6 months ------' --
Vanadium 6 months --------
Xylenes (total) 14 days --------
Zinc 6 months --------
NC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ----------
Anions BALANCE-W ----------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days --------
Calcium 6 months --------
Carbonate as C03 14 days --------
Cations BALANCE-W ----------
Magnesium 6 months --------
Potassium 6 months --------
Sodium 6 months --------
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
,
QAPHolding MW-30 MW-31 MW-32 ',MW;.3S'
, Constituent Time' 7110/2012 7/9/2012 7/9/2012 7/10/2012
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 10 days 9 days --9 days
Acetone 14 days 10 days 9 days --9 days
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 7 days 8 days --7 days
Arsenic 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Benzene 14 days 10 days 9 days --9 days
Beryllium 6 months 22 days 23 days --22 days
Cadmium 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 10 days 9 days --9 days
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 9 days 10 days --9 days
Chloroform 14 days 10 days 9 days --9 days
Chloromethane 14 days 10 days 9 days --9 days
Chromium 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Cobalt 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Copper 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days 10 days 9 days --9 days
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days 3 days 4 days --3 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months 29 days 30 days 30 days 30 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months 29 days 30 days 30 days 30 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 29 days 30 days 30 days 30 days
Iron 6 months 8 days 9 days --8 days
Lab pH (S.U.) --3 days 4 days --3 days
Lead 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Manganese 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Mercury 28 days 22 days 23 days --22 days
Molybdenum 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Naphthalene 14 days 10 days 9 days --9 days
Nickel 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 6 days 7 days --6 days
Selenium 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Silver 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 10 days 11 days --10 days
TDS (mg/L) 7 days 3 days 4 days --3 days
Tetrah ydrofuran 14 days 3 days 4 days --3 days
Thallium 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Tin 6 months 2 days 3 days --2 days
Toluene 14 days 10 days 9 days --9 days
Uranium 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Vanadium 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days 10 days 9 days --9 days
Zinc 6 months 15 days 16 days --15 days
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W --29 days 30 days --29 days
Anions BALANCE-W --29 days 30 days --29 days
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days 3 days 4 days --3 days
Calcium 6 months 8 days 9 days --8 days
Carbonate as C03 14 days 3 days 4 days --3 days
Cations BALANCE-W --29 days 30 days --29 days
Magnesium 6 months 8 days 9 days --8 days
Potassium 6 months 8 days 9 days --8 days
Sodium 6 months 8 days 9 days --8 days
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
,. ,
'.
QAP Holding MW-65 MW-65 · -MW-70
Constituent Time 7/11/2012 811612012 . -7118/2012 -
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days --6 days --
Acetone 14 days --6 days --
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 6 days ----
Arsenic 6 months 21 days ----
Benzene 14 days --6 days --
Beryllium 6 months 21 days ----
Cadmium 6 months 21 days ----
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days --6 days --
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 8 days ----
Chloroform 14 days --13 days --
Chloromethane 14 days --6 days --
Chromium 6 months 21 days ----
Cobalt 6 months 21 days ----
Copper 6 months 21 days ----
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days --6 days --
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days 2 days --5 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months 29 days ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months 29 days ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 29 days ----
Iron 6 months 7 days ----
Lab pH (S.u.) --2 days ----
Lead 6 months 21 days ----
Manganese 6 months 21 days ----
Mercury 28 days 21 days ----
Molybdenum 6 months 21 days ----
Naphthalene 14 days --6 days --
Nickel 6 months 21 days ----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 5 days ----
Selenium 6 months 21 days --18 days
Silver 6 months 21 days ----
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 9 days ----
TDS (mg/L) 7 days 2 days ----
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 2 days ----
Thallium 6 months 21 days ----
Tin 6 months 1 days ----
Toluene 14 days --6 days --
Uranium 6 months 21 days ----
Vanadium 6 months 21 days ----
Xylenes (total) 14 days --6 days --
Zinc 6 months 21 days ----
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W --28 days ----
Anions BALANCE-W --28 days ----
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days 2 days ----
Calcium 6 months 7 days ----
Carbonate as C03 14 days 2 days ----
Cations BALANCE-W --28 days ----
Magnesium 6 months 7 days ----
Potassium 6 months 7 days ----
Sodium 6 months 7 days ----
G-2B: Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
'," !'
QAPHolding MW-14
Constituent Time MW-1181712012 817/2012 MW -25 8/6/2012
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days ------
Acetone 14 days ------
Ammonia (as N) 28 days ------
Arsenic 6 months ------
Benzene 14 days ------
Beryllium 6 months ------
Cadmium 6 months ------
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days ------
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days ------
Chloroform 14 days ------
Chloromethane 14 days ------
Chromium 6 months ------
Cobalt 6 months ------
Copper 6 months ------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days ------
Field pH (S.U.) Immediate
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months ------
Iron 6 months ------
Lab pH (S.U.) --------
Lead 6 months ------
Manganese 6 months 20 days 20 days --
Mercury 28 days ------
Molybdenum 6 months ------
Naphthalene 14 days ------
Nickel 6 months ------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days ------
Selenium 6 months ------
Silver 6 months ------
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days ------
TDS (mg/L) 7 days ------
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days ------
Thallium 6 months ------
Tin 6 months ------
Toluene 14 days ------
Uranium 6 months ----21 days
Vanadium 6 months ------
Xylenes (total) 14 days ------
Zinc 6 months ------
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W --------
Anions BALANCE-W --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days ------
Calcium 6 months ------
Carbonate as C03 14 days ------
Cations BALANCE-W --------
Magnesium 6 months ------
Potassium 6 months ------
Sodium 6 months ------
G-2B: Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
". , ....
QAP Holding
Constituent 'Time MW-268/8/2012
. .
MW-30 81712012 MW ~31 816/2012
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 6 days ----
Acetone 14 days 6 days ----
Ammonia (as N) 28 days ------
Arsenic 6 months ------
Benzene 14 days 6 days ----
Beryllium 6 months ------
Cadmium 6 months ------
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 6 days ----
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 6 days 7 days 8 days
Chloroform 14 days 6 days ----
Chloromethane 14 days 6 days ----
Chromium 6 months ------
Cobalt 6 months ------
Copper 6 months ------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days 6 days ----
Field pH (S.U.) Immediate
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months ------
Iron 6 months ------
Lab pH (S.U.) --------
Lead 6 months ------
Manganese 6 months ------
Mercury 28 days ------
Molybdenum 6 months ------
Naphthalene 14 days 6 days ----
Nickel 6 months ------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 5 days 6 days 7 days
Selenium 6 months --20 days --
Silver 6 months ------
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days ----8 days
TDS (mg/L) 7 days 2 days --4 days
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days ------
Thallium 6 months ------
Tin 6 months ------
Toluene 14 days 6 days ----
Uranium 6 months 19 days 20 days --
Vanadium 6 months ------
Xylenes (total) 14 days 6 days ----
Zinc 6 months ------
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W --------
Anions BALANCE-W --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days ------
Calcium 6 months ------
Carbonate as C03 14 days ------
Cations BALANCE-W --------
Magnesium 6 months ------
Potassium 6 months ------
Sodium 6 months ------
G-2B: Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
, ,
QAPHolding , ,MW-ll MW-14
Constituent Time MW -35 8/8/2012 9119/2012 9118/2012
2-B utanone (MEK) 14 days ------
Acetone 14 days ------
Ammonia (as N) 28 days ------
Arsenic 6 months ----"\ --
Benzene 14 days ------
Beryllium 6 months ------
Cadmium 6 months ------
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days ------
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days ------
Chloroform 14 days ------
Chloromethane 14 days ------
Chromium 6 months ------
Cobalt 6 months ------
Copper 6 months ------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days ------
Field pH (S.U.) Immediate
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months 22 days ----
Gross'Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months 22 days ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 22 days ----
Iron 6 months ------
Lab pH (S.U.) --------
Lead 6 months ------
Manganese 6 months 19 days 16 days 17 days
Mercury 28 days ------
Molybdenum 6 months ------
Naphthalene 14 days ------
Nickel 6 months ------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days ------
Selenium 6 months 19 days ----
Silver 6 months ------
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days ------
TDS (mg/L) 7 days ------
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days ------
Thallium 6 months 19 days ----
Tin 6 months ------
Toluene 14 days ------
Uranium 6 months 19 days ----
Vanadium 6 months ------
Xylenes (total) 14 days ------
Zinc 6 months ------
NC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W --------
Anions BALANCE-W --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days ------
Calcium 6 months ------
Carbonate as C03 14 days ------
Cations BALANCE-W --------
Magnesium 6 months ------
Potassium 6 months ------
Sodium 6 months ------
G-2B: Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
, ,,', ,,' .
"',
QAPHolding MW-2S MW-.26 MW-30
Constituent Time 9/18/2012 9/19/2012 9/~9/2012
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days --17 days --
Acetone 14 days --17 days --
Ammonia (as N) 28 days ------
Arsenic 6 months ------
Benzene 14 days --17 days --
Beryllium 6 months ------
Cadmium 6 months ------
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days --17 days --
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days --6 days 26 days
Chloroform 14 days --15 days --
Chloromethane 14 days --17 days --
Chromium 6 months ------
Cobalt 6 months ------
Copper 6 months ------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days --17 days --
Field pH (S.U.) Immediate
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months ------
Iron 6 months ------
Lab pH (S.U.) --------
Lead 6 months ------
Manganese 6 months ------
Mercury 28 days ------
Molybdenum 6 months ------
Naphthalene 14 days --17 days --
Nickel 6 months ------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days --8 days 8 days
Selenium 6 months ----16 days
Silver 6 months ------
Sulfate (mglL) 28 days ------
TDS(mglL) 7 days ------
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days ------
Thallium 6 months ------
Tin 6 months ------
Toluene 14 days --17 days --
Uranium 6 months 17 days 16 days 16 days
Vanadium 6 months ------
Xylenes (total) 14 days --17 days --
Zinc 6 months ------
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W --------
Anions BALANCE-W --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days ------
Calcium 6 months ------
Carbonate as C03 14 days ------
Cations BALANCE-W --------
Magnesium 6 months ------
Potassium 6 months ------
Sodium 6 months ------
G-2B: Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
QA.P Holding MW;.31 . MW-35
Constituent . Time 9/18/2012 9/19/2012
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days ----
Acetone 14 days ----
Ammonia (as N) 28 days ----
Arsenic 6 months ----
Benzene 14 days ----
Beryllium 6 months ----
Cadmium 6 months ----
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days ----
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 7 days --
Chloroform 14 days ----
Chloromethane 14 days ----
Chromium 6 months ----
Cobalt 6 months ----
Copper 6 months ----
DichlorOIhethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days ----
Field pH (S.U.) Immediate
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months --IS days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months --IS days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months --IS days
Iron 6 months ----
Lab pH (S.U.) ------
Lead 6 months ----
Manganese 6 months --16 days
Mercury 28 days ----
Molybdenum 6 months ----
Naphthalene 14 days ----
Nickel 6 months ----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 9 days --
Selenium 6 months --16 days
Silver 6 months ----
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 7 days --
TDS (mg/L) 7 days 6 days --
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days ----
Thallium 6 months --16 days
Tin 6 months ----
Toluene 14 days ----
Uranium 6 months --16 days
Vanadium 6 months ----
Xylenes (total) 14 days ----
Zinc 6 months ----
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ------
Anions BALANCE-W ------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days ----
Calcium 6 months ----
Carbonate as C03 14 days ----
Cations BALANCE-W ------
Magnesium 6 months ----
Potassium 6 months ----
Sodium 6 months ----
G-3A: Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
Sampl~ Batch Wells in Batch Temperature
MW -02, MW -03, MW -03A, MW -05, 2.4 °C
EL -C12070741 MW-12, MW-15, MW-18, MW-19,
MW-23, MW-24, MW-27, MW-28,
MW-70
MW-11,MW-14,MW-25,MW-26, 1.6°C
EL -C12070448 MW-30,MW-31,MW-35,MW-65,
MW-29, MW-32, Trip Blank
EL -C 12080830 MW -26 Resample, MW -65 Resample, 3.2°C
Trip Blank
EL -C12080143 MW-28 Resample, MW-29 Resample, 4.0°C
MW-37, Trip Blank
MW-11,MW-14, MW-25, MW-26, 1.8°C
AWAL -1207185 -THF and Tin MW-30,MW-31,MW-35,MW-65,
Trip Blank
A W AL -1208066 -THF and Tin MW-37, Trip Blank 2.7°C
·i
G-3B: Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check -Accelerated Samples
. Sample Batch Wells in Batch Ii . Temperature
~VV-11,~VV-25 ,~VV-26,~VV-30,~VV-2.0°C
EL -C 120080469 31, ~VV-35, ~VV-65, Trip Blank
~VV-11,~VV-25,~VV-26,~VV-30,~VV-2.0°C
EL - C 12090804 31, ~VV-35, ~VV-65, Trip Blank
G-4A: Analytical Method Check
. Parameter QAPMethod* Method Used by Lab
Ammonia (as N) A4500-NH3 G or E350.1 A4500-NH3 G
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) E353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
Metals Except Mercury E200.7 or E200.8 E200.8
Mercury E245.1 or E200.7 or E200.8 E200.8
Gross Alpha E900.0 or E900.1 E900.1
VOCs SW8260B or SW8260C SW8260B
Chloride A4500-CI B or A4500-CI E or E300.0 A4500-CIB
Fluoride A4500-F C or E300.0 A4500-FC
Sulfate A4500-S04 E or E300.0 A4500-S04 E
TDS A2540C A2540 C
Carbonate as C03, Bicarbonate as HC03 A2320 B A2320B
Iron, Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium E200.7 E200.7
Tetrahydrofuran and tin were analyzed by American West Analytical Laboratories. All other constituents were analyzed by Energy Laboratories.
G-4B: Analytical Method Check -Accelerated Samples
Parameter QAPMethod , Method Used by Lab
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) E353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
Metals Except Mercury E200.7 or E200.8 E200.8
Gross Alpha E900.0 or E900.1 E900.1
VOCs SW8260B or SW8260C SW8260B
Chloride A4500-Cl B or A4500-Cl E or E300.0 E300.0
Sulfate A4500-S04 E or E300.0 E300.0
TDS A2540C A2540C
Iron, Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium E200.7 E200.7
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
, '." 'MW-2 " -MW-J
"
I" --"' 7116/2012 ~ 711S/20l2 , -
,
QAP Reporting
Constituent , Limit ' RL .Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-B utanone (MEK) 20 !!g/L --------
Acetone 20 !!g/L --------
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L --------
Arsenic 5 !!g/L --------
Benzene 1.0 !!g/L --------
Beryllium 0.50 !!glL --------
Cadmium 0.50 !!g/L --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 !!g/L --------
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L --------
Chloroform 1.0 !!g/L --------
Chloromethane 1.0 !!g/L --------
Chromium 25 !!g/L --------
Cobalt 10 !!g/L ---- ----
Copper 10 !!g/L --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 !!g/L ---- ----
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L ----0.1 mg/L
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL o pCiIL --
Iron 30 !!g/L --------
Lead 1.0 !!g/L --------
Manganese 10 !!g/L ---- ----
Mercury 0.50 !!g/L ---- ----
Molybdenum 10 !!g/L --------
Naphthalene 1.0 !!g/L --------
Nickel 20 !!g/L --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L --------
Selenium 5 !!g/L ----5 ug/L
Silver 10 !!g/L --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L ---- ----
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L --------
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 !!g/L --------
Thallium 0.50 !!g/L --------
Tin 100 !!g/L --------
Toluene 1.0 !!g/L --------
Uranium 0.30 !!g/L --------
Vanadium 15 !!g/L --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 !!g/L --------
Zinc 10 !!g/L --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L --------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L --------
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L --------
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L --------
Potassium 0.5 mg/L --------
Sodium 0.5 mg/L --------
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW~3A ., .'MW-5
. 7119/2012 7116/2012
" . " " .
QAP Reporting
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 Ilg/L --------
Acetone 20 Ilg/L -- ------
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L --------
Arsenic 5 Ilg/L --------
Benzene 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Beryllium 0.50 Ilg/L --------
Cadmium 0.50 Ilg/L --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L --------
Chloroform 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Chloromethane 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Chromium 25 Ilg/L --------
Cobalt 10 Ilg/L --------
Copper 10 Ilg/L -- ------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL ----
Iron 30 Ilg/L --------
Lead 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Manganese 10 Ilg/L --------
Mercury 0.50 Ilg/L --------
Molybdenum 10 Ilg/L -- ------
Naphthalene 1.0 Ilg/L -- ------
Nickel 20 Ilg/L -- ------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L --------
Selenium 5 Ilg/L 5 ug/L ----
Silver 10 Ilg/L --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L 20mg/L D ----
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L 10MG/L ----
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Thallium 0.50 Ilg/L -- ------
Tin 100 Ilg/L --------
Toluene 1.0 Ilg/L -- ------
Uranium 0.30 Ilg/L ----0.3 ug/L
Vanadium 15 Ilg/L --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Zinc 10 Ilg/L --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L --------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L -- ------
Carbonate, as C03 1 mg/L -- ------
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L --------
Potassium 0.5 mg/L -- --.----
Sodium 0.5 mg/L --------
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW-l1 MW-12 .
. 7111/2012. 7117/2012
, ,
QAP Rep~rting
Constituent Limit RL . Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-B utanone (MEK) 20 ~g/L 20 ug/L U ----
Acetone 20 ~g/L 20 ug/L U ----
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L 0.05 mg/L ----
Arsenic 5 ~g/L 5 ug/L U ----
Benzene 1.0 ~g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Beryllium 0.50 ~g/L 0.5 ug/L U ----
Cadmium 0.50 ~g/L 0.5 ug/L U ----
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 ~g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L 1 mg/L ----
Chloroform 1.0 ~g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Chloromethane 1.0 ~g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Chromium 25 ~g/L 25 ug/L U ----
Cobalt 10 ~g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Copper 10 ~g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride ) 1.0 ~g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL o pCi/L --
Iron 30 ~g/L 30 ug/L ----
Lead 1.0 ~g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Manganese 10 ~g/L 10 ug/L ----
Mercury 0.50 ~g/L 0.5 ug/L U ----
Molybdenum 10 ~g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Naphthalene 1.0 ~g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Nickel 20 ~g/L 20 ug/L U ----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L U ----
Selenium 5 ~g/L 5 ug/L U 5 ug/L
Silver 10 ~g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L 50 mg/L D ----
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L 10MG/L ----
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 ~g/L Oug/L ----
Thallium 0.50 ~g/L 0.5 ug/L U ----
Tin 100 ~g/L Oug/L ----
Toluene 1.0 ~g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Uranium 0.30 ~g/L 0.3 ug/L ----
Vanadium 15 ~g/L 15 ug/L U , ----
Xylenes (total) 1.0 ~g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Zinc 10 ~g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L 1 mg/L ----
Calcium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L 1 mg/L U ----
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
Potassium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
Sodium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW-14 . t, MW-15
'". 'c, 7/11/2012 7/17/2012 .
QAP Reporting
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 !!g/L 20 ug/L 'U ----
Acetone 20 !!g/L 20 ug/L U ----
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L 0.05 mg/L U ----
Arsenic 5 !!g/L 5 ug/L U ----
Benzene 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Beryllium 0.50 !!g/L 0.5 ug/L U ----
Cadmium 0.50 !!g/L 0.5 ug/L ----
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L 1 mg/L ----
Chloroform 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Chloromethane 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Chromium 25 !!g/L 25 ug/L U ----
Cobalt 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Copper 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCi/L o pCi/L --
Iron 30 !!g/L 30 ug/L U 30 ug/L U
Lead 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Manganese 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L ----
Mercury 0.50 !!g/L 0.5 ug/L U ----
Molybdenum 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Naphthalene 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Nickel 20 !!g/L 20 ug/L U ----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L U ----
Selenium 5 !!g/L 5 ug/L U 5 ug/L
Silver 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L 50 mg/L D ----
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L 10MG/L ----
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 !!g/L Oug/L ----
Thallium 0.50 !!g/L 0.5 ug/L U ----
Tin 100 !!g/L Oug/L ----
Toluene 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Uranium 0.30 !!g/L 0.3 ug/L ----
Vanadium 15 !!g/L 15 ug/L U ----
Xylenes (total) 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Zinc 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L 1 mg/L ----
Calcium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L 1 mg/L U ----
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
Potassium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
Sodium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW-18 MW-19
7118/2012 7119/20i2
. QAP Reporting
Constituent Limit RL .' Qmilifier RL .. Qualifier
2-B utanone (MEK) 20 ~g/L --------
Acetone 20 ~g/L --------
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L --------
Arsenic 5 ~g/L --------
Benzene 1.0 ~g/L --------
Beryllium 0.50 ~g/L --------
Cadmium 0.50 ~g/L --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 ~g/L --------
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L --------
Chloroform 1.0 ~g/L --------
Chloromethane 1.0 ~g/L --------
Chromium 25 ~g/L --------
Cobalt 10 ~g/L --------
C~pper 10 ~g/L --------
DichloroIhethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 ~g/L --------
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCi/L ----
Iron 30 ~g/L --------
Lead 1.0 ~g/L --------
Manganese 10 ~g/L --------
Mercury 0.50 ~g/L --------
Molybdenum 10 ~g/L --------
Naphthalene 1.0 ~g/L --------
Nickel 20 ~g/L --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L ----0.2 mg/L D
Selenium 5 ~g/L --------
Silver 10 ~g/L --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L 8mg/L D ----
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L 10MG/L ----
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 ~g/L --------
Thallium 0.50 ~g/L 0.5 ug/L ----
Tin 100 ~g/L --------
Toluene 1.0 ~g/L --------
Uranium 0.30 ~g/L --------
Vanadium 15 ~g/L --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 ~g/L --------
Zinc 10 ~g/L . --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L --------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L --------
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L --------
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L --------
Potassium 0.5 mg/L --------
Sodium 0.5 mg/L --------
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
-' 'M-W-23 MW-24 ,
7117/2012 7/18/2012 .'
QAP Reporting' .
Constituent Limit RL 'QuaHfier RL Qualifier
2-B utanone (MEK) 20 !lg/L --------
Acetone 20 !lg/L --------
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L --------
Arsenic 5 !lg/L --------
Benzene 1.0 !lg/L --------
Beryllium 0.50 !lg/L --------
Cadmium 0.50 !lg/L ----0.5 ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 !lg/L --------
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L --------
Chloroform 1.0 !lg/L --------
Chloromethane 1.0 !lg/L --------
Chromium 25 !lg/L --------
Cobalt 10 !lg/L --------
Copper 10 !lg/L --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 !lg/L --------
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCi/L ----
Iron 30 !lg/L --------
Lead 1.0 !lg/L --------
Manganese 10 !lg/L 1 ug/L ----
Mercury 0.50 !lg/L --------
Molybdenum 10 !lg/L --------
Naphthalene 1.0 !lg/L --------
Nickel 20 !lg/L --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L --------
Selenium 5 !lg/L --------
Silver 10 !lg/L --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L --------
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L --------
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 !lg/L --------
Thallium 0.50 !lg/L ----0.5 ug/L
Tin 100 !lg/L --------
Toluene 1.0 !lg/L --------
Uranium 0.30 !lg/L --------
Vanadium 15 !lg/L --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 !lg/L --------
Zinc 10 !lg/L --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L --------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L --------
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L --------
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L --------
Potassium 0.5 mg/L --------
Sodium 0.5 mg/L --------
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
", , MW-25 MW-26
" , 7/10/2012 ,7/1112012 c' " .
QAP Reporting
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 "",gIL 20 uglL U ----
Acetone 20 "",gIL 20 uglL U ----
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mglL 0.1 mglL 0.05 mglL
Arsenic 5 "",gIL 5 uglL U 5 uglL U
Benzene 1.0 "",gIL 1 uglL U ----
Beryllium 0.50 "",gIL 0.5 uglL U 0.5 uglL U
Cadmium 0.50 "",gIL 0.5 uglL 0.5 uglL U
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 "",gIL 1 uglL U ----
Chloride (mglL) 1 mglL 1 mglL 1 mglL
Chloroform 1.0 "",gIL 1 uglL U ----
Chloromethane 1.0 "",gIL 1 uglL U ----
Chromium 25 "",gIL 25 uglL U 25 uglL U
Cobalt 10 "",gIL 10 uglL U 10 uglL U
Copper 10 "",gIL 10 uglL U 10 uglL U
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 "",gIL 1 uglL U ----
Fluoride (MglL) 0.1 mglL 0.1 mglL 0.1 mglL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCilL o pCilL o pCiIL
Iron 30 "",gIL 30 uglL U 30 uglL
Lead 1.0 "",gIL 1 uglL U 1 uglL U
Manganese 10 "",gIL 10 uglL 10 uglL
Mercury 0.50 "",gIL 0.5 uglL U 0.5 uglL U
Molybdenum 10 "",gIL 10 uglL 10 uglL U
Naphthalene 1.0 "",gIL 1 uglL U ----
Nickel 20 "",gIL 20 uglL U 20 uglL U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mglL 0.1 mglL U 0.1 mglL
Selenium 5 "",gIL 5 uglL U 5 uglL U
Silver 10 "",gIL 10 uglL U 10 uglL U
Sulfate (mglL) 1 mglL 50 mglL D 50 mglL D
TDS (mglL) 10 mglL 10MGIL 10MGIL
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 "",gIL OuglL OuglL
Thallium 0.50 "",gIL 0.5 uglL 0.5 uglL U
Tin 100 "",gIL OuglL OuglL
Toluene 1.0 "",gIL 1 uglL U ----
Uranium 0.30 "",gIL 0.3 uglL 0.3uglL
Vanadium 15 "",gIL 15 uglL U 15 uglL U
Xylenes (total) 1.0 "",gIL 1 uglL U ----
Zinc 10 "",gIL 10 uglL U 10 uglL U
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mglL 1 mglL 1 mglL
Calcium 0.5 mglL 0.5 mglL 0.5 mglL
Carbonate as C03 1 mglL 1 mglL U 1 mglL U
Magnesium 0.5 mglL 0.5 mglL 0.5 mglL
Potassium 0.5 mglL 0.5 mglL 0.5 mglL
Sodium 0.5 mglL 0.5 mglL 0.5 mglL
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW-26 MW~27
"
-8/16/2012 7116/2012
/ ,-
QAP Reporting
Constituent r' Limit RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 !-lg/L 20 ug/L U ----
Acetone 20 !-lg/L 20 ug/L U ----
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L --------
Arsenic 5 !-lg/L --------
Benzene 1.0 !-lg/L 1 ug/L U ----
Beryllium 0.50 !-lg/L --------
Cadmium ' 0.50 !-lg/L --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 !-lg/L 1 ug/L U ----
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L ----I mg/L
Chloroform 1.0 !-lg/L 25 ug/L D ----
Chloromethane 1.0 !-lg/L 1 ug/L U ----
Chromium 25 !-lg/L --------
Cobalt 10 !-lg/L --------
Copper 10 !-lg/L --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 !-lg/L 1 ug/L ----
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCi/L --o pCi/L
Iron 30 !-lg/L --------
Lead 1.0 !-lg/L --------
Manganese 10 !-lg/L --------
Mercury 0.50 !-lg/L --------
Molybdenum 10 !-lg/L , --------
Naphthalene 1.0 !-lg/L 1 ug/L U ----,
Nickel 20 !-lg/L --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L ----0.5 mg/L D
Selenium 5 !-lg/L --------
Silver 10 !-lg/L --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L ----4mg/L D
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L ----10 MG/L
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 !-lg/L --------
Thallium 0.50 !-lg/L --------
Tin 100 !-lg/L --------
Toluene 1.0 !-lg/L 1 ug/L U ----
Uranium 0.30 !-lg/L --------
Vanadium 15 !-lg/L --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 !-lg/L 1 ug/L U ----
Zinc 10 !-lg/L --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L --------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L --------
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L --------
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L --------
Potassium 0.5 mg/L --------
Sodium 0.5 mg/L --------
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
"
;, MW~28 MW-28
7/16/2012 811/2012 ,
Q~P Reporting
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL ' <' Qualifier ,
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 Ilg/L --------
Acetone 20 Ilg/L --------
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L --------
Arsenic 5 Ilg/L --------
Benzene 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Beryllium 0.50 Ilg/L --------
Cadmium 0.50 Ilg/L --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L 4mg/L D ----
Chloroform 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Chloromethane 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Chromium 25 Ilg/L --------
Cobalt 10 Ilg/L --------
Copper 10 Ilg/L --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL ----
Iron 30 Ilg/L --------
Lead 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Manganese 10 Ilg/L ----10 ug/L
Mercury 0.50 Ilg/L --------
Molybdenum 10 Ilg/L --------
Naphthalene 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Nickel 20 Ilg/L --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L --------
Selenium 5 Ilg/L --------
Silver 10 Ilg/L --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L --------
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L --------
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Thallium 0.50 Ilg/L --------
Tin 100 Ilg/L --------
Toluene 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Uranium 0.30 Ilg/L --------
Vanadium 15 Ilg/L --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Zinc 10 Ilg/L --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L --------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L --------
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L --------,
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L --------
Potassium 0.5 mg/L --------
Sodium 0.5 mg/L --------
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW-29 " MW-29
" . 7110/2012 8111201Z ,.
QAP Reporting "
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL . Qualifier
2-B utanone (MEK) 20 ~g/L --------
Acetone 20 ~g/L --------
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L --------
Arsenic 5 ~g/L --------
Benzene 1.0 ~g/L --------
Beryllium 0.50 ~g/L --------
Cadmium 0.50 ~g/L --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 ~g/L --------
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L --------
Chloroform 1.0 ~g/L --------
Chloromethane 1.0 ~g/L --------
Chromium 25 ~g/L --------
Cobalt 10 ~g/L --------
Copper 10 ~g/L --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 ~g/L --------
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCi/L ----
Iron 30 ~g/L 30 ug/L ----
Lead 1.0 ~g/L --------
Manganese 10 ~g/L ----10 ug/L
Mercury 0.50 ~g/L --------
Molybdenum 10 ~g/L --------
Naphthalene 1.0 ~g/L --------
Nickel 20 ~g/L --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L --------
Selenium 5 ~g/L --------
Silver 10 ~g/L --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L --------
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L ----10MG/L
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 ~g/L --------
Thallium 0.50 ~g/L --------
Tin 100 ~g/L --------
Toluene 1.0 ~g/L --------
Uranium 0.30 ~g/L --------
Vanadium 15 ~g/L --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 ~g/L --------
Zinc 10 ~g/L --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L --------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L --------
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L --------
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L --------
Potassium 0.5 mg/L --------
Sodium 0.5 mg/L --------
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
" , MW-30 MW-31 .
. 7/10/2012 .7/9/2012
QAP Reporting
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20/lg/L 20 ug/L U 20 ug/L U
Acetone 20/lg/L 20 ug/L U 20 ug/L U
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L 0.05 mg/L U 0.05 mg/L U
Arsenic 5 /lg/L 5 ug/L U 5 ug/L U
Benzene 1.0/lg/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Beryllium 0.5O /lg/L 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ug/L U
Cadmium 0.50/lg/L 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ug/L U
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0/lg/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
Chloroform 1.0/lg/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Chloromethane 1.0/lg/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Chromium 25 /lg/L 25 ug/L U 25 ug/L U
Cobalt 10/lg/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Copper 10/lg/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0/lg/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL o pCiIL o pCi/L
Iron 30/lg/L 30 ug/L 30 ug/L U
Lead 1.0/lg/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Manganese 10/lg/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L U
Mercury 0.50/lg/L 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ug/L U
Molybdenum 10/lg/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Naphthalene 1.0/lg/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Nickel 20/lg/L 20 ug/L U 20 ug/L U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 1 mg/L D 1 mg/L D
Selenium 5 /lg/L 5 ug/L 5 ug/L
Silver 10/lg/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L 20 mg/L D 10 mg/L D
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L 10MG/L 10MG/L
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0/lg/L Oug/L Oug/L
Thallium 0.50/lg/L 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ug/L U
Tin · 100/lg/L Oug/L Oug/L
Toluene 1.0/lg/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Uranium 0.30/lg/L 0.3 ug/L 0.3 ug/L
Vanadium . 15 /lg/L 15 ug/L U 15 ug/L U
Xylenes (total) 1.0/lg/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Zinc 10/lg/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
Calcium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L 1 mg/L U 1 mg/L U
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L
Potassium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L
Sodium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
, -, ; MW~32 ' , , 'MW-35 "
" 7/9/2012 " " 7/10/2012 " ,
"
" ' QAP Reporting
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-B utanone (MEK) 20 !!g/L ----20 ug/L U
Acetone 20 !!g/L ----20 ug/L U
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L ----0.1 mg/L
Arsenic 5 !!g/L ----5 ug/L U
Benzene 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Beryllium 0.50 !!g/L ----0.5 ug/L U
Cadmium 0.50 !!g/L ----0.5 ug/L U
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Chloride (mg/L) 1 rng/L ----I mg/L
Chloroform 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Chloromethane 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Chromium 25 !!g/L ----25 ug/L U
Cobalt 10 !!g/L ----10 ug/L U
Copper 10 !!g/L ----10 ug/L U
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L ----0.1 mg/L
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCi/L o pCi/L o pCi/L
Iron 30 !!g/L ----30 ug/L
Lead 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Manganese 10 !!g/L ----10 ug/L
Mercury 0.50 !!g/L ----0.5 ug/L U
Molybdenum 10 !!g/L ----10 ug/L U
Naphthalene 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Nickel 20 !!g/L ----20 ug/L U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L ----0.1 mg/L U
Selenium 5 !!g/L ----5 ug/L
Silver 10 !!g/L ----10 ug/L U
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L ----50 mg/L D
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L ----10MG/L
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 !!g/L ----Oug/L
Thallium 0.50 !!g/L ----0.5 ug/L
Tin 100 !!g/L ----o ug/L
Toluene 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Uranium 0.30 !!g/L ----0.3 ug/L
Vanadium 15 !!g/L ----IS ug/L U
Xylenes (total) 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Zinc 10 !!g/L ----10 ug/L U
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L ----I mg/L
Calcium 0.5 mg/L ----0.5 mg/L
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L ----I mg/L U
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L ----0.5 mg/L
Potassium 0.5 mg/L ----0.5 mg/L
Sodium 0.5 mg/L ----I mg/L D
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW-36 MW-37
, -7/1112012 7/30/2012
QAP Reporting 1'-
Constituent , Limit RL Qualifjer RL Qualifier
2-B utanone (MEK) 20 !!g/L 20 ug/L U 20 ug/L U
Acetone 20 !!g/L 20 ug/L U 20ug/L U
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L 0.1 mg/L U 0.1 mg/L U
Arsenic 5 !!g/L 5 ug/L U 5 ug/L U
Benzene 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Beryllium 0.50 !!g/L 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ug/L U
Cadmium 0.50 !!g/L 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ug/L U
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 4mg/L D
Chloroform 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Chloromethane 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U .1 ug/L U
Chromium 25 !!g/L 25 ug/L U 25 ug/L U
Cobalt 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Copper 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0pCi/L o pCi/L o pCiIL
Iron 30 !!g/L 30 ug/L U 30 ug/L U
Lead 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Manganese 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Mercury 0.50 !!g/L 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ug/L U
Molybdenum 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Naphthalene 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Nickel 20 !!g/L 20 ug/L U 20 ug/L U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L
Selenium 5 !!g/L 5 ug/L 5 ug/L
Silver 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L 50 mg/L D 20 mg/L D
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L 10MG/L 10MG/L
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 !!g/L o ug/L 0.1 ug/L
Thallium 0.50 !!g/L 0.5 ug/L 0.5 ug/L U
Tin 100 !!g/L o ug/L 0.6 ug/L
Toluene 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Uranium 0.30 !!g/L 0.3 ug/L 0.3 ug/L
Vanadium 15 !!g/L 15 ug/L U 15 ug/L U
Xylenes (total) 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Zinc 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
Calcium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L 1 mg/L U 1 mg/L U
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L
Potassium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L
Sodium 0.5 mg/L 1 mg/L D 2mg/L D
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW-65 -:. MW-65
."' . 7/11/2012 '. i" 8/16/2012
'." . ,
QAP Reporting
Constituent Limit . -: RL Qualifier RL Qualifier ·
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 !!g/L ----20 ug/L U
Acetone 20 !!g/L ----20 ug/L U
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L 0.1 mg/L ----
Arsenic 5 !!g/L 5 ug/L U ----
Benzene 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Beryllium 0.50 !!g/L 0.5 ug/L U ----
Cadmium 0.50 !!g/L 0.5 ug/L U ----
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L 1 mg/L ----
Chloroform 1.0 !!g/L ----25 ug/L D
Chloromethane 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Chromium 25 !!g/L 25 ug/L U ----
Cobalt 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Copper 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL o pCi/L --
Iron 30 !!g/L 30 ug/L ----
Lead 1.0 !!g/L 1 ug/L U ----
Manganese 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L ----
Mercury 0.50 !!g/L 0.5 ug/L U ----
Molybdenum 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Naphthalene 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Nickel 20 !!g/L 20 ug/L U ----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L ----
Selenium 5 !!g/L 5 ug/L ----
Silver 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L 50 mg/L D ----
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L 10MG/L ----
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 !!g/L Oug/L ----
Thallium 0.50 !!g/L 0.5 ug/L U ----
Tin 100 !!g/L Oug/L ----
Toluene 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Uranium 0.30 !!g/L 0.3 ug/L ----
Vanadium 15 !!g/L 15 ug/L U ----
Xylenes (total) 1.0 !!g/L ----I ug/L U
Zinc 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L U ----
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L 1 mg/L ----
Calcium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L 1 mg/L U ----
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
Potassium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
Sodium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
. " . !' > 'MW.;70
7118/2012
",'
QAP Reporting
Constituent Limit RL . Qualifier
2-B utanone (MEK) 20 ""gIL ----
Acetone 20 ""gIL ----
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mglL ----
Arsenic 5 ""gIL ----
Benzene 1.0 ""gIL ----
Beryllium 0.50 ""gIL ----
Cadmium 0.50 ""gIL ----
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 ""gIL ----
Chloride (mglL) 1 mglL ----
Chloroform > 1.0 ""gIL ----
Chloromethane 1.0 ""gIL ----
Chromium 25 ""gIL ----
Cobalt 10 ""gIL ----
Copper 10 ""gIL ----
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 ""gIL ----
Fluoride (MglL) 0.1 mglL 0.1 mglL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCilL --
Iron 30 ""gIL ----
Lead 1.0 ""gIL ----
Manganese 10 ""gIL ----
Mercury 0.50 ""gIL ----
Molybdenum 10 ""gIL ----
Naphthalene 1.0 ""gIL ----
Nickel 20 ""gIL ----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mglL ----
Selenium 5 ""gIL 5 uglL
Silver 10 ""gIL ----
Sulfate (mglL) ImglL ----
TDS (mglL) 10 mglL ----
Tetrahydrofuran . 1.0 ""gIL ----
Thallium 0.50 ""gIL ----
Tin 100 ""gIL ----
Toluene 1.0 ""gIL ----
Uranium 0.30 ""gIL ----
Vanadium 15 ""gIL ----
Xylenes (total) 1.0 ""gIL ----
Zinc 10 ""gIL ----
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mglL ----
Calcium 0.5 mglL ----
Carbonate as C03 1 mglL ----
Magnesium 0.5 mglL ----
Potassium 0.5 mglL ----
Sodium 0.5 mglL ----
G-5B: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
" .. .,' 'MW-ll 8/7/2012 MW-148/7/2012 , .
QAJ> It.epo~ting
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL Qualifier.
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 f..lglL --------
Acetone 20 f..lg/L --------
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L --------
Arsenic 5f..lglL --------
Benzene 1.0 f..lg/L --------
Beryllium 0.50 f,tg/L --------
Cadmium 0.50 f..lg/L --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 f..lglL --------
Chloride (mglL) 1 mglL --------
Chloroform 1.0 f..lglL --------
Chloromethane 1.0 f..lg/L --------
Chromium 25 f..lglL --------
Cobalt 10 f,tg/L --------
Copper 10 f..lglL --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 f,tglL --------
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCilL ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 1.0pCiIL ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 1.0pCilL ------
Iron 30 f..lglL --------
Lead 1.0 f,tg/L --------
Manganese 10 f,tglL 10 ug/L --10 ug/L
Mercury 0.50 f..lglL --------
Molybdenum 10 f,tglL --------
Naphthalene 1.0f,tg/L --------
Nickel 20 f..lglL --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L --------
Selenium 5f,tglL --------
Silver 10 f..lglL --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L --------
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L --------
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 f..lglL --------
Thallium 0.50 f..lg/L --------
Tin 100 f..lg/L --------
Toluene 1.0 f..lg/L --------
Uranium 0.30 f..lglL --------
Vanadium 15 f,tg/L --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 f..lg/L --------
Zinc 10 f,tglL --------
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W --------
Anions BALANCE-W --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mglL --------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L --------
Carbonate as C03 1 mglL --------
Cations BALANCE-W --------
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L --------
Potassium 0.5 mglL --------
Sodium 0.5 mglL --------
G-5B: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
. MW-2S ~/6/2012 .. l\'IW -26 8/8/2012
,.
QAP Reporting ·
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 !J,gIL ----20 ugIL U
Acetone 20 !J,glL ----20 ugIL U
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L --------
Arsenic 5!J,glL --------
Benzene 1.0 !J,g/L ----I ugIL U
Beryllium 0.50 f,lg/L --------
. Cadmium 0.50 !J,glL --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 !J,glL ----I ugIL U
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mgIL ----4mg/L D
Chloroform 1.0 !J,glL ----500 uglL D
Chloromethane 1.0f,lglL ----I ugIL U
Chromium 25 !J,g/L --.~ ------
Cobalt 10 f,lgIL --------
Copper 10 !J,g!l --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 !J,g/L ----I ugIL
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.1 mg/L --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCi/L --. --
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 1.0pCilL ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 1.0 pCi/L ----
Iron 30 !J,g!L --------
Lead 1.0 !J,g/L --------
Manganese 10 f,lg/L --------
Mercury 0.50 !J,g/L --------
Molybdenum 10 !J,g/L --------
Naphthalene 1.0f,lglL ----1uglL U
Nickel 20 !J,glL --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mglL ----OJ mg/L
Selenium 5 f,lgIL --------
Silver 10 !J,glL --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mglL --------
TDS (mg/L) 10 mglL ----lOMG/L
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 f,lglL --------
Thallium 0.50 !J,g/L --------
Tin 100 f,lglL --------
Toluene 1.0f,lg/L ----I ug/L U
Uranium 0.30 !J,g/L 0.3 ug/L 0.3 ugIL
Vanadium 15 f,lg/L --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 !J,g/L ----I ug/L U
Zinc 10 !J,g/L ------
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ----
Anions BALANCE-W ----
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L ------
Calcium 0.5 mglL ------
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L ------
Cations BALANCE-W ----
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L ------
Potassium 0.5 mgIL ------
Sodium 0.5 mglL ------
G-5B· Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
MW -30 8/7/2012 MW-318/6/2012
QAP Reporting
. Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL Quaiifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 Ilg/L --------
Acetone 20 J.lg/L --------
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L --------
Arsenic 5 Ilg/L --------
Benzene 1.0 J.lg/L --------
Beryllium 0.50 IlglL --------
Cadmium 0.50 Ilg/L --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 J.lg/L --------
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mglL 2mg/L D 1 mg/L
Chloroform 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Chloromethane 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Chromium 25 Ilg/L --------
Cobalt 10 J.lg/L --------
Copper 10 IlglL --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mglL --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCi/L ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 1.0 pCi/L ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 1.0 pCi/L ----
Iron 30 IlglL --------
Lead 1.0 IlgIL --------
Manganese 10 J.lglL --------
Mercury 0.50 Ilg/L --------
Molybdenum 10 Ilg/L --------
Naphthalene 1.0 J.lg/L --------
Nickel 20 Ilg/L --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 2mg/L D 2mg/L D
Selenium 5J.lglL 5 ug/L ----
Silver 10 Ilg/L --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L ----4mg/L D
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L ----lOMG/L
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Thallium 0.50 Ilg/L --------
Tin 100 J.lglL --------
Toluene 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Uranium 0.30 Ilg/L 0.3 ug/L ----
Vanadium 15 J.lg/L --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Zinc 10 Ilg/L --------
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ------
Anions BALANCE-W ------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L --------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L --------
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L --------
Cations BALANCE-W ------
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L --------
Potassium 0.5 mg/L --------
Sodium 0.5 mg/L --------
G-5B: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
MW-358/8/2012 -MW ·65 81712012
QAP Reporting
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 !lg/L --------
Acetone 20 !lg/L --------
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L --------
Arsenic 5!lg/L --------
Benzene 1.0 !lg/L --------
Beryllium 0.50 !lg/L --------
Cadmium 0.50 !lg/L --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 !lg/L --------
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L --------
Chloroform 1.0 !lg/L --------
Chloromethane 1.0 ug/L --------
Chromium 25 !lg/L --------
Cobalt 10 !lg/L --------
Copper 10 !lg/L ----. ----
Oichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 !lg/L --------
F1uoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC 1.0pCilL o pCilL ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 1.0pCilL o pCiIL ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 1.0 pCi/L 0.2 pCi/L ----
Iron 30 !lg/L --------
Lead 1.0 !lg/L --------
Manganese 10 !!g/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L --
Mercury 0.50 !lg/L --------
Molybdenum 10 ug/L --------
Naphthalene 1.0 ug/L --------
Nickel 20 !lg/L --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L --------
Selenium 5!!g/L 5 ug/L ----
Silver 10 !lg/L --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L --------
TOS (mg/L) 10 mg/L --------
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 !lg/L --------
Thallium 0.50 !lg/L 0.5 ug/L ----
Tin 100 !!g/L ---------
Toluene 1.0 !lg/L --------
Uranium 0.30 !lg/L O.3Ug/L ----
Vanadium 15 !!g/L --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 !lg/L --------
Zinc 10 !lg/L ------
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ------
Anions BALANCE-W ------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L ------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L ------
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L ------
Cations BALANCE-W ------
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L ------
Potassium 0.5 mg/L ------
Sodium 0.5 mg/L ------
G-5B· Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
,: MW -11 9(19/2012 MW-149/18/2012
( QAPReporting ~
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL . -Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 ~g/L --------
Acetone 20 [.tg/L --------
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mgIL --------
Arsenic 5 ~gIL --------
Benzene 1.0 [.tgIL --------
Beryllium 0.50 ~gIL --------
Cadmium 0.50 ~gIL --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 [.tglL --------
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L --------
Chloroform 1.0 ~glL --------
Chloromethane 1.0 ~gIL --------
Chromium 25 ~glL --------
Cobalt 10 [.tg/L --------
Copper 10 uglL --------
Oichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 [.tWL --------
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.1 mgIL --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC 1.0 pCiIL ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 1.0 pCi/L ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 1.0 pCilL ----
Iron 30 ~g/L --------
Lead 1.0 [.tgIL --------
Manganese 10 ~g/L 10 ugiL --
Mercury 0.50 ~g/L --------
Molybdenum 10 [.tg/L --------
Naphthalene 1.0 ~gIL --------
Nickel 20 ~glL --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L --------
Selenium 5~glL --------
Silver 10 ~g/L --------
Sulfate (mwL) 1 mg/L --------
TOS (mg/L) 10 mgIL --------
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 ~g/L --------
Thallium 0.50 ~glL --------
Tin 100 [.tg/L --------
Toluene 1.0 ~g/L --------
Uranium 0.30 !LglL --------
Vanadium 15 [.tglL --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 ~g/L --------
Zinc 10~glL --------
NC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ------
Anions BALANCE-W ------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mglL --------
Calcium 0.5 mglL --------
Carbonate as C03 1 mglL --------
Cations BALANCE-W ------
Magnesium 0.5 mgIL --------
Potassium 0.5 mg/L --------
Sodium 0.5 mglL --------
G-5B' Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
MW-2S 9/18/2012. MW -269/19/2012
QAP Reporting
Constifuen~ Limit RL Qualifier. RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 flglL ----20 ugiL UH
Acetone 20 flg/L ----20 ug/L UH
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L ------
Arsenic 5flglL --------
Benzene 1.0 flg/L ----lug/L UH
Beryllium 0.50 flg/L --------
Cadmium 0.50 f.,tg/L --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 flg/L ----I ug/L UH
Chloride (mglL) 1 mg/L ----2mg/L D
Chloroform 1.0 flg/L ----100 ugiL DH
Chloromethane LOflglL ----I ug/L UH
Chromium 25 flg/L --------
Cobalt 10 f.,tg/L --------
Copper 10 flg/L --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 f.,tg/L ----lugiL H
Fluoride (MglL) 0.1 mg/L --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1,0 pCi/L ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 1,0 pCi/L ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 1,0 pCi/L ----
Iron 30 flg/L --------
Lead 1.0 f.,tg/L --------
Manganese 10 flg/L --------
Mercury 0.50 flglL --------
Molybdenum 10 flg/L --------
Naphthalene 1,0 flg/L ----lug/L UH
Nickel 20 flg/L --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L ----OJ mg/L
Selenium 5 flg/L --------
Silver 10 flg/L --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L --------
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L --------
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 flg/L ------,--
Thallium 0.50 flg/L --------
Tin 100 flg/L --------
Toluene 1.0 flglL ----I ug/L UH
Uranium 0.30 f.,tg/L 0.3 ug/L 0.3 ugiL
Vanadium 15 flg/L --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 flg/L ----I ug/L UH
Zinc 10 flg/L ------
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ----
Anions BALANCE-W ----
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L ------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L ------
Carbonate as C03 1 mglL ------
Cations BALANCE-W ----
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L ------
Potassium 0.5 mglL ------
Sodium 0.5 mglL ------
G-SB: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
, MW -30 9/19/2012 MW-319/18/2012 "I
QAP Reporting
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 ftglL --------
Acetone 20 ftg/L --------
Ammonia (as N) O.OS mglL --------
Arsenic SftglL --------
Benzene 1.0 ftg/L --------
Beryllium 0.50 ug/L --------
Cadmium 0.50ftglL --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 ftg/L --------
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mglL 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
Chloroform 1.0 ftglL --------
Chloromethane 1.0 ftglL --------
Chromium 2SIlg!l --------
Cobalt 10 Ilg/L --------
Copper 10 ftg/L --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.01lg/L --------
fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 1.0 pCilL ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 1.0 pCi/L ----
Iron 30 ftglL --------
Lead 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Manganese 10 Ilg/L --------
Mercury O.SO ftglL --------
Molybdenum 10 Ilg/L --------
Naphthalene 1.0 Ilg/L --------
Nickel 20 ftglL --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 2mgIL D 2mglL D
Selenium S Ilg/L S uglL ----
Silver 10 ftglL --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 1 mg/L ----4mgIL D
TDS (mglL) 10 mglL ----lOMGIL
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 ug/L --------
Thallium 0.50ftglL --------
Tin 100 Ilg/L --------
Toluene 1.0 ftglL --------
Uranium 0.30 Ilg/L 0.3 ugIL ----
Vanadium IS Ilg/L --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 ftg/L --------
Zinc 10 Ilg/L --------
NC Balance (± S) BALANCE-W ------
Anions BALANCE-W ------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L --------
Calcium O.S mg/L --------
Carbonate as C03 1 mgIL --------
Cations BALANCE-W ------
Magnesium O.S mg/L --------
Potassium O.S mglL --------
Sodium O.S mglL --------
G-5B: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
" '-' e' MW."35 9/19/2012' . MW-65 9/1912012
.' .-.
"
" ,
QAP Reporting'
ConstitUent ,. Limit RL Qualifier RL Qualifier '
2-Butanone (MEK) 20/-lg/L --------
Acetone 20/-lglL --------
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L --------
Arsenic 5/-lg/L --------
Benzene 1.0/-lg/L --------
Beryllium 0.50/-lg/L --------
Cadmium 0.50/-lgiL --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0/-lg/L --------
Chloride (mgIL) 1 mg/L --------
Chloroform 1.0/-lg/L --------
Chloromethane 1.0/-lglL --------
Chromium 25/-lgiL --------
Cobalt 10/-lg/L --------
Copper 10 /-lgiL --------
Oichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0/-lg/L --------
Fluoride (MglL) 0.1 mg/L --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC 1.0 pCi/L o pCilL o pCi/L
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 1.0 pCi/L o pCi/L o pCilL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 1.0 pCilL 0.2 pC ilL 0.2 pCilL
Iron 30/-lg/L --------
Lead 1.0/-lg/L --------
Manganese 10 /-lg/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L
Mercury 0.50 ug/L --------
Molybdenum 10/-lg/L --/ ------
Naphthalene 1.0/-lg/L --------
Nickel 20/-lgiL --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) O.l mglL --------
Selenium 5/-lg/L 5 ug/L 5 ug/L
Silver 10 /-lg/L --------
Sulfate (mglL) 1 mg/L --------
TOS (mglL) 10 mg/L --------
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0/-lg/L --------
Thallium 0.50/-lglL 0.5 ug/L 0.5 ug/L U
Tin 100/-lg/L --------
Toluene 1.0/-lg/L --------
Uranium 0.30/-lglL 0.3 ug/L 0.3 ug/L
Vanadium 15 uglL --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0/-lg/L --------
Zinc 10 /-lg/L --------
NC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ------
Anions BALANCE-W ------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mglL --------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L --------
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L --------
Cations BALANCE-W ------
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L --------
Potassium 0.5 mg/L --------
Sodium 0.5 mg/L --------
G-6A: Trip Blank Evaluation
All trip blanks for the 2012 Third Quarter samples were nondetect.
Blank Sample Date Laboratory
EL -C12070448 7/13/2012 Energy Laboratories
EL -C12080830 8/16/2012 Energy Laboratories
EL -C12080143 8/3/2012 Energy Laboratories
AWAL -1207185 -THF and Tin 7/9/2012 American West Analytical Laboratories
A W AL -1208066 -THF and Tin 7/30/2012 American West Analytical Laboratories
G-6B: Trip Blank Evaluation
All trip blanks for the Accelerated samples were non detect.
Blank Sample Date Laboratory
1 8/812012 Energy Laboratories
2 9/1912012 Energy Laboratories
G-7 A: QAlQC Evaluation for Routine Sample Duplicates
...
Constituent MW-26 MW-65 %RPD
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 1.9 2.1 10.00
Iron 773 793 2.55
Manganese 1100 1200 8.70
Selenium 5 5.1 1.98
Uranium 28.4 30.2 6.14
Chloroform 970 960 1.04
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 4.9 5.2 5.94
Chloride (mg/L) 78 74 5.26
Field pH (S.U.) 7.1 6.72 5.50
TDS (mgIL) 3060 3130 2.26
Bicarbonate as HC03 382 390 2.07
Calcium 493 463 6.28
Cations BALANCE-W 45.6 45.3 0.66
Magnesium 152 161 5.75
Potassium 9.5 10.4 9.05
Sodium 189 201 6.15
Radiologic Duplicate Tests
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 0.2 0.2 0.00
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U* 1.8 2 0.471
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 0.3 0.3
* Duplicate checks reported for gross alpha minus RN and U are not %RPD. Calculated values are
based on the formula in the approved QAP.
Constituent MW-03 MW-70 %RPD
Selenium 51.1 48.6 5.02
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.96 1.02 6.06
G-7B: QAlQC Evaluation for Accelerated Sample Duplicates
:, < 'c MW-14 .. MW-65 •... "
Constituent 817/2012 817/2012' .%RPD
Manganese 2300 2250 2.20
MW-35 MW-65 ·
Constituent 9/19/2012 9/19/2012 %RPD
Manganese 283 273 3.60
Selenium 8.2 9.7 16.76
Thallium 0.54 0.5 7.69
Uranium 22.9 22.6 1.32
Radiologic RPD Tests
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 0.2 0.2 0.00
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 5.4 6 0.71
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 0.6 0.6
G-8A: Radiologics Counting Error
'" Gross Alpba
Gross Alpha minusRn&U Counting
, Well . Sample Date minus Rn & U Precision (±) ... Error ~'20% .
MW-02 7/1612012 0.9 0.2 N
MW-11 711112012 0.3 0.1 N
MW-14 711112012 0.2U 0.1 N
MW-25 711012012 0.7 0.2 N
MW-26 711112012 1.8 0.3 Y
MW-27 711612012 1.2 0.3 N
MW-30 711012012 0.3 0.1 N
MW-31 7/912012 0.3 0.1 N
MW-32 7/912012 1.4 0.2 Y
MW-35 7/1012012 3.5 0.3 Y
MW-36 7/1112012 0.6 0.2 N
MW-37 7/3012012 2.9 1.2 N
MW-65 7/1112012 2 0.3 Y
N/A -the counting error is less than 20% of the activity as required by the GWDP. The
value is above the GWCL and this check column is not applicable.
NC -Sample results were nondetect and as such the check is not applicable
.'
Within
GWCL GWCL?
3.2 Y
3.75 Y
7.5 NC
7.5 Y
4.69 Y
2 Y
3.75 Y
7.5 Y
3.33 Y
3.75 NA
No GWCLs have been set
4.69 Y
G-8B: Radiologies Counting Error for Accelerated Samples
Gross Alpha Counting
Gross Alpha minusRn&U Error~
Well Sample Date . minus Rn' & tJ Precision (±) 20%
MW-35 8/8/2012 4.2 0.5 Y
MW-35 9/19/2012 5.4 0.6 Y
N/A -the counting error is less than 20% of the activity as required by the GWDP. The value is
above the GWCL and this check column is not applicable.
GWCL
NA
NA
G-9A: Laboratory Matrix QC
Matrix Spike % Recovery Comparison
'MSD
Lab Report Well Analyte MS %REC %REC REC Range ,-R;PD
C12070448 NA Naphthalene 80 102 70 -130 25
C12070448 MW-35 Chloromethane 71 88 70 -130 21
C12070448 NA Acetone 69 68 70 -130 1.7
C12070741 NA Manganese* NC NC 70 -130 NC
C12080830 NA Naphthalene 83 103 70 -130 21
C12080143 NA Methylene Chloride 68 65 70 -130 4.2
NA = MS samples were not Denison samples.
*= Recovery was not calculated as the analyte level in the sample was greater than 4 times the spike level.
Surrogate % Recovery
Lab
Specifi.ed QAP
Surrogate REC · ' Required
Lab 'Report WelVSample Analyte %REC Range ' Range
C12070448 MW-31 p-Bromofluorobenzene 78 80 -120 None
C12070448 MW-35 p-Bromofluorobenzene 75 80 -120 None
C12070448 Trip Blank p-Bromofluorobenzene 78 80 -120 None
C12070448 Method Blank p-Bromofluorobenzene 79 80 -120 None
C12070448 Method Blank p-Bromofluorobenzene 78 80 -120 None
LCS % Recovery
,.
QAP
t" . Lab Specified 'Required
Lab Report Analyte LCS %REC REC Range Range
C1208143 Gross Alpha 131 70 -130 None
Method Blank detections
QAP
Reported Required
Lab Report WelVSample ' 'Analyte Concentration RL
C12080143 Method Blank Bicarbonate 1.52 mg/L 1.0mg/L
G-9B: Accelerated Laboratory Matrix QC
M 0 S ok ~ R C atrIX 'pl e o ecovery omparIson
L~b'Report Well Analyte MS%REC ','
MW-65 (duplicate of
C12080469 -August Accelerated MW-14) Manganese* NC
C12090804 -September Accelerated NA Nitrate+Nitrite as N 116
*= Recovery was not calculated as the analyte level in the sample was greater than 4 times the spike level.
NA = MS samples were not Denison samples.
Laboratory Control Sample
Lab Report Analyte '·LCS %REC
C12080469 -August Accelerated Gross Alpha 78
Surrogate % Recovery
All surrogate recoveries were witin the laboratory established recovery ranges.
Lab Specified
.RECRange
80 -120
'MSD %REC
NC
113
QAPRequired
Range
None
RECRange RPD%
70-130 NC
90 -110 1.9
TabH
Kriged Current Quarterly Groundwater Contour Map
@ estimated dry area
M.W-S perched monitoring well showing
5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW04-12 temporary perched monitoring well
5583 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-10 A 5586 temporary perched nitrate monitoring
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
~ 5593 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-27 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5526 installed October, 2011 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING 6 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are pumping wells
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2012 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H :/718000/nov121UwI0912.srf H-l
Tab I
Groundwater Time Concentration Plots
=r ....... til) .§.
CII :'5! 0 ::E u
=r bo .§.
CII :'5! 0 :J u:::
Time concentration plots for MW-01
Chloride in MW-Ol
60 ~--------------------------------------------------------~
sO t----------1-----------------------------------------------J
40
30
20
10
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-Ol
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
o ~----~----~----~----~----~----~----~------~---J
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non"Detected Values
5000
4500
4000
3500
:J' 3000
"D:o E i 2500
J!! ~ 2000
1500
1000
Time concentration plots for MW-01
Sulfate in MW-Ol
-
•
~ ..... ---JIll -.... --~ ........ ~ ----..... -r .. ... U -..,... ....,...
r r I 4
500
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-Ol
12 r-------------------------------------------------------~
10 t-r---------------------------------------------------~
8 t1t---------------------------------------------~
:J' ~
§ 6t-1t--------------------------------------------------J
'c IV
=> 4 ~Hr---1t--Jt~--~-1r--f~-----------------------~
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-02
Chloride in MW-02
80 r-------------------------------------------------------~
70 r----------1r------------------------------------------------J
60 r----------1t------------------------------------------------J
~ so r-----------1r---------------------------------------------------J
"aD .s ~ 40 r-----------1t---------------------------------------------------J
o ::c
u 30 r-----------tt---------------------------------------------------J
2°tl~~n_--tt~------------------------------------------J
10
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
~ "aD .s 0.5
Q.I
'a .~ 0.4
::l u:::
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-02
A
~/ ~ lIlA...&. _
0.3 ~f\ V ~.
0.2
0.1
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Nan-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-02
Sulfate in MW-02
2500 r-------------------------------------------------------------~
~ 1500 r111N1------1--------------6----------------------------------~ co .§.
.2! J!! ~ 1000 rt~g---------------------------------------------------------~
500 ~~r---------------------------------------------------------J
20
18
16
14
~ 12 co -= E 10 ::s ·c ~ 8 ::J
f-~ I
14 6
4
2
.A
.( \
~
0
~"> ~ 0
I
~
~,,>'\
~o
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-02
~ I~ \
\
Sample Date
~ r
". lj \1 -
d
/
\/
V
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non·Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-03
Chloride in MW-03
160
140 .
120
::i' 100 -lID .§.
<II 80 "a "§ ::c u 60
40
20
0
(;,,0, 9J'? ~ 0 '>v
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-03
1.2 r--------------------~--------.
1 r-------------------------------.--~------------J
0.8 ,------------------... ------'-LJ
::i' "Qo .§. ~ 0.6 r-1Ie;~==~------------------------------Jl------~--~~~-J
(;
::l i!:
0.4
0.2 r--r---------------------------J
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-03
Sulfate in MW-03
4500
4000
3500
3000
::J -~ 2500
.2l J!! 2000 :;
III
1500
1000
500
0
-\0)
(f 0
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-03
80 r-----------------------------------------------------~
70 t-------~~----------------------------------------~
60 t---------t------------------------------------------------J
::J 50 t----------lH-----------------------------------------------------J ~
§ 4°t---------tt--------------~Ir----~----~~~~-,~----~
'c f! ~ 3°t----------t1~~~t~~ .. a__i~~~~------------II~~----~
20
10
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-03A
Chloride in MW-03A
80 .r-------------------------------------------------------~
70 -t---.---4l-----
~ 50 r--------------------------.----~f_---\--~------------------------J
Qo .s ~ 40 r---------------------------------------~-------------------J
o ::c
u 30 r---------------------------------------------------------------------J
20 T--------------------------.-----
10 r---------------------------------.-----------------------
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-03A
1.8 r -------------------------------.
1.6 ..... -----------
1.4 n-~~-------:iir----j~-=--~-----·------I
1.2 t1rt---1r-=:::;;;;~=---"""'r__J~----\----4~~------J
~ -r 1 t-~----~-1~-----------~~--------~~~~-------~~::~
Qj "a "g 0.8 r------~t-t-----------------------------------------I
i:i:
0.6 t--"-----hl----·-------------------
0.4 ,------1rt-------------------------1
0.2 ,-----1t-------------------------I
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-03A
Sulfate in MW-03A
4500 r-------------------------------------------------------------~
4000 ~----------------------------------------------------------~
3500 t7~ ................. -~L.
3000 r-----------------------------------------------------------------J
::i" -~ 2500 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
CI.l ~ 2000 :;
VI
1500 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
1000 r---------------.----------------------------~--------------~ 50:t-·-·
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-03A
40
35
30
::i" 25 -3
E 20 ::J '2 "' ::l 15
I I\. , J '---. , ./
1 , --f ---~
~
10 I
I
5
0 ~
!:)~ ~ ..... ~
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
::i" -QO .§.
Qj
~ 0 ::c u
::i" -QO
.§.
Qj ~ 0 :J u:::
Time concentration plots for MW-05
Chloride in MW-OS
140
120
100
80
60
40
20 t-1t--------------------------------------------------------~
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
.xCbt:> ~'? (f ~'b <::)'1;
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-OS
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Vafl:Je5
Time concentration plots for MW-05
Sulfate in MW-OS
9000
8000
7000
6000
:::i -~ 5000
CII .i 4000 "'5 11'1
3000
_A I . ---A. ..... --2000 -,. ..-, v ' -1000
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-OS
35 r-----------------------------~----------------------~
30 t---------------------------------------------------~~
25 t------------------------------------------------------J--J
:::i ~ 20 t-------------------------------------------------------------~-J
E ::J ·c ~ 15 t-------------------------------------------------------------Jl-IU
:::)
10 t---,---------------------------------------------------~~
5 t-----------------------OF----------------------~~~
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
80
70
60
~ 50 ...... QII
.5-
Qj 40 :2 (;
:E u 30
20
10
0
9;,'1.-(f ~e;
0.8
0.7
0.6
~ 0.5
ti.o .5-
Qj 0.4 "t:J ";: o = ii: 0.3
0.2
0.1
Kq,~
~'b
Time concentration plots for MW-11
Chloride in MW-ll
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-ll
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
.....
lJ
~1 ~Jt r\
."'1"
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-11
Sulfate in MW-ll
2500 r-------------------------------------------------------------~
2000 r-1t------------------------------------------------------------J
~ 1500 t-.r-----------------1t----------------------------------------~ tio E.
~ J!! ~ 1000 ~l1~liiJ"iP,.~~.,~~~~lL==~~~--------~~~~~~--~
500 r-----U---------------------------------------------------~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-ll
4.5 r---------------------------------------------------------~
4 T---------------------.~----
3.5 r---------.----------~-------------------------------------J
3 t---------------~----------~~----------------~
~ tio ~2.5 r------------..------ti---------------~~--------------------~
E :::J .~ 2 t------------t----~~~-----------,~----------------------J
~
1.5 r-----:It----f-t-1t--.;-:I-----IHlt-..J·--------!
Sample Date
Detected Value~
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected. Values
Time concentration plots for MW-12
Chloride in MW-12
160
140
120 1-----1r---------------------------------------------------1
::! 100 ........ tl.D .§.
CIJ 80 "a "t:;
0 ~ u 60
40
20
0
~ .xCO
~'b'
Sample Date
._-----------------------------.....,
Fluoride in MW-12
0.4 r -------------------------------.
0.35 +------
::! 0.25 ;----------
'iio .§.
~ 0.2 ;--------
"t:; o :::s u:: 0.15 --------------------------------------
0.1 r--------------------------------------------------~
0.05 ,----------------------------------1
O +-----~----~------r_----~----_.----~----
.xCO'? ~'b'
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non·Oetected Values
9000
8000
7000
6000
::::J -~ 5000
QI ~ 4000 :i VI
3000
2000
1000
---
...I --
Time concentration plots for MW-12
Sulfate in MW-12
... -AlII .... . ..... ~~ y ...... -)I V' ~ ..a... ....... ~ --• -
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-12
25 r-------------------------------------------------------~
20 t-----~~----------~--~----------~~~~-----ll-----~~~
5 +---~------------,
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Va'lues
I
I
Time concentration plots for MW-14
Chloride in MW-14
40
35
30
::J 25
"Qa .s
cv 20 :2 0 :i: u 15
10
5
0
,¥q,o, '" ,¥o,':I< ~ (Jo,o, ~o, ~o, ~o ~'rI ~o ~'rI ()'l;
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-14
0.3
0.25
0.2
::J -a.o .s
cv 0.15 "t:J ";::
0 :s u:::
0.1
0.05
o +-----~------~----~------~----_r------~----~
~o,o,
~'rI
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-14
Sulfate in MW-14
2500 r-------------------------------------------------------------~
2000 lIt1~~_1t_----------------~~~~~-------I~~----~UL------J
~ 1500
tID E..
~ ~ ~ 1000 t---------------------------------------------------------------J
=r '-~
E ::J ·c ~ ::J
500 t-----------------------------------------------------------~
O +-----~--~----~----~----~----~----~----~--~
~q;,0)
~o
120
100
80
40
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-14
20 ~---------tt-----------------------------~----------~
0 +-----1----~----~----~----~----~----~--~-----J
~q;,0) or.;
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Nan-Detected Va·lues
Time concentration plots for MW-15
Chloride in MW-1S
60
50
40
:::i' liD ..s
Qj 30 :5! 0 :c u
20
10 t-------------------------------------------------------J
0
~c:oo, '" ~o,~ ~ ~o,o, $)'" ~~ sY-~o, ~o, ~~o, ~v ~o ~'li ~o ~'li ~o ~~ ~o ~"t>..J\ ~o ~'li
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-1S
0.4 .,----------------------------....,
0.35 ,----,--------------iii"---------------1
:::i' 0.25 ,------1r--t------~ ....... ~,c:.~ .... ---'r-----:::---:---.------:lIa--I
liD ..s ~ 0.2 1-------t--t--------------------·-----1
.~
~
u::: 0.15 ,--.-----4H-------------------------I
0.1 j------.t---------------------1
0.05 1-------------------------------1
o +----.... .. ---,.---....---r------..--
~o,o,
~'li
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-15
Sulfate in MW-lS
3000 r-----------------------------------------------------------~
2500 1tir--------.-a-------------------------------~~----·------~
2000 1tt1t-------------~------------------------------------------J
~ 'Qa
E i 1500 llr-------------------------------------------·----------------·~
~ :;
\I)
1000 t----------------------------------------------------------------J
500 r----------------------------------------------------------~
0
~tpO) '" ~O)'i>< C\ ~O)O) ~'" ~~ C\ ;:>:.0) ;:>:.0) i) ~r;:,0) ;:>:.V' ~o ~rt; ~o ~rt; ~o ~'l>~ ~o ~rt; ~o ~'l>
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-lS
70 r-------------------------------------------------------~
60 ~----------------------------------------------------~
~ ~40 t-~_tt_~t_--_tlf~~~~tI~-----------I---------~~--------~~
E :::J .~ 30 t-~r__t-"'rt...!!!..------=------------------I~------l :;
20 ~--------~t---------.--------------------------------~
10 t-"----------ir-------------------------------------------J
O +-----~--~----~----~----~----~----~---
Sample Date
Detected Value~
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
~ aa .5-
QI :2 0 ::2 u
Time concentration plots for MW-17
Chloride in MW-17
60
50
40
30
20
10 t------------------------------~--.----------------------------~
O +-----~-----~----~------r_----~----~----_r----~----~
,¥OJ'" ~o
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-17
0.45 ,-------------------------------.....,
0.4 t-------------------------------~~~---------------------~
0.35 t---~~----------------f----\------------I
0.3 t-7~---... -.. IIIiiiO:=-------=--:~--\----:::---------~
~ aa .5-0.25 t---------------------=------------...--:~~~~-=:~
QI
"tS .~ 0.2 -t----------------
:::J u:::
0.15 -t----------.------
0.1 t------------------------------------------------------~
0.05 t---------------------------------~
Sample Date
Detected Value~
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-17
Sulfate in MW-17
3500 ~----------------------------------------------------------------~
3000 T-----------------------------------------------------'
~ ~ 2000 ~-tt---1r--~-----------------------------------------------------1 .§.
~ ~ 3 1500
\I)
1000 t----------1~------------------,----------------------.------------~
500 t-----------------------------------------------------------------~
0
~?>", ~ 9)'\ !') ~ .... 5:>'" ~<, ~'b ~-$ '),
~~ ;:1\05 ~ ~O5 c.,~<'i ~o~ c «,qJ1 ;:1\ .... ~~ \V ~v <:)q; ~~ ~~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-17
50
45
40
35
~ 30
~
E 25 ::J 'c ~ 20 :::)
15
10
5
0
~?>", ~ ~ ;:1\05 ~ ~~ ~~ \V
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-18
Chloride in MW-18
80
70
60
':J' 50
"-a.o .5.
GI 40 ~ 0 :c u 30
20
10
0
~'i'J'? ~ -xOj ~'b ~'b
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-18
0.45 1 -----------------------------.....
0.4 TIIiii~=_---------------------------J
0.35 I---~:_------::;,;i~~-\-----------------I
0.3 I-·---~ ...... II!!::...-----_\_-___,~------------J
':J' a:o .5. 0.25 I----------------\;~,L--.:~-----------I
GI ~ '§ 0.2 +-----
~ u:::
0.15 1-----------------------1-1-------1
0.1 r-------------------------------~---------J
0.05 r-------------------------I~------I
Sample Date
Dete(:ted Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-18
Sulfate in MW-18
2500 r-----------------------------------------------------------~
2000 +-----
~ 1500 ~~~----------------~~~~L---------------------------------J
.§.
~ ~ ~ 1000 r---------------------------------------------------------------J
500 t-----------------------------------------------J
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-18
60r-------------------------------------------------------~
50 1-------------------------------------------------------=----~
40
::::J -~
E 30
::J 'c ~ :)
20
10 t-~t\--~~------------------------------------------~
Sample Date
Detec.ted Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • NOll-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-19
Chloride in MW-19
100
90
80
70
:J' 60 ~ .5-
Qj 50 ~ 0 ::c 40 u
30
20
10
L:~~ n ~
~'li ;:xOj r:f ~~ ,;<>
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-19
1.6 -,---------------------------.......
1.4 r---------------------...------------I
1.2 ,------------------1--4 -----.:-------1
:J' 1 t--------------~ .. _.~---------~~--------~~=1~~~~~~~1
~ .5-
Qj 0.8 ~-----------.-------------_I_I_------I ~ I
o :::J ~ 0.6 r------------------------------------------~~----------~
0.4 1----------------~---_I_-----1
0.2 I--------------------~I_------I
o +-------r------~-------_r-------r_------r_----~----___._-----~------4
;:xOjOj
~~
Sample Date
Detected Value!;
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Nan-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-19
Sulfate in MW-19
3000 r----------------------------------------------------------------
2500 t-~r-------------------------------------------~---------------J
2000 +-~~------------~~~~~----------------------------------~
::;
'Qa
E i 1500 ,---t-------~~-------------l~~~----.------------------------J
~ :;
\I)
::; ....... ~
E ::J ·c
~ ::l
1000 t----1~~--------------------~~------~~----~------------llJ
500 t-----------------------------~-----------=~~~~~~~~~
0
~?J", n ~ P} ~"y ~", ~<, ~<tJ
~~ ;:xOj ~ ~Oj "e~ ~o~ G «.~ ~"yf::> ;:xV ~~ ".;:). ~.;:). <::)q; ~~ ~~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-19
30
25
20
15
10
5 t----------------------------------------------------~
0
~OJ'" n ~ ~OJOJ ~"y ,¥f::>'" ~" ~'tJ
~~ lj ~ "e~ G «.~ ~~ ;:xV ~~ ".;:). ~.;:). ~o <::)q; ~~ ~~
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-20
Chloride in MW-20
80 r-----------------------------------------------------------~
70 t---------------------------------------------------~~-----J
60 t-----------------------------~~--~=---------~~~1l~~~
~ 50 r----------==-__ --~---------------------------------------------J
liD .§. ~ 40 r----------------------------------------------------------------J
.~
:E
u 30 r-------------------------------------------------------------.---J
20 t-------------------------------------------------------------J
10 t------------------------------------------------------------J
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-20
0.4 r------------------------------------------------------------
0.35 +---------------:~~~~~~ .... .-------~
0.3 t-------:7 ....... 1--4------------------------~-----------....
~ 0.25 t:::;;;r/F-------------------. ---------------------------.~,...",..~:.-.-___I
liD .§. ~ 0.2 r-------------------------------------------------I
(;
::l u::: 0.15 +-______ .
0.1 +--------------
0.05 +----.
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non"Detected Values
4500
4000
3500
3000
:::J "'-~ 2500
~ J!! 2000 :;
I/)
1500
1000
500
0
co,~
,>'/;
40
35
30
:::J 25
"'-l1li ..:!:
E 20 ~ 'c E :::> 15
10
5
0
co,~
,>'/;
~o,fo
~o
~o,fo
~o
Time concentration plots for MW-20
!b (Yo,
0
Sulfate in MW-20
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-20
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-22
r-----------------------------------------------------.--------~
80
70
60
::J 50
tiD E.
Qj 40 ~ o ~ u 30
20
10
o
.----
.......
Chloride in MW-22
--,(J A 1 .----'vr ~y .----
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-22
6 r-----------------------------------------------~
5 +------
4 r---------------------------~------------~---------J
2 t----------------------------.----------------------------~
o +-----~------~----_.------~-----
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected. Values
Time concentration plots for MW-22
Sulfate in MW-22
7000 r-----------------------------------------------------------~
6000 r-------------------------------------------------~----------~l
5000 r---------------------------------------~~~~~~~~~-l~
~ Qo 4000 t----------"",..."..II!!!!!!==----.
.§.
! ~ J 3000 t---------------------------------------------J
2000 r-----------------------------------------------------------------J
1000 r-------------------------------------------------------------J
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-22
60 ~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~
40
~ "-~
E 30 ::::s ·c
I! ::J
20
10 t--------------------------------------------------------------~
0 .,--
~O)t;,. ~O)fo ~O)CQ t;::,t:::> t;::,'" ~ ~t:::>fo t;::,CQ ~..."t:::> ~v ()'l' ~o 0(.; c.,e~ c.,e~ ~'V ~ ~oS "oS "oS ~~ ~~
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-23
Chloride in MW-23
35
30 j-----------------------------~-------
25 r--------------------------i~-------------------------------J
:J -~ 20 t--------------------------~Hr·----------------------------------j .§.
GI 't:J
"§ 15 t--------------------------1H~--------------------------------j ~ u
10 r-------------------~~-~~~~-------------------------J
5 r-------------.----~----~--~--~~--~--------~-J
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
:J 'liD .§. 0.5
GI 't:J "§ 0.4
:;, u::
0.3
0.2
0.1
o
1--
" "-I \/
I •
r
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-23
\~ .......
----.... ......... ..-....4 .. -
i i i i
Sample Date
Detected Values:
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Va'lues
~ 'be E
Time concentration plots for MW-23
Sulfate in MW-23
3000 r-------------------------------------------------------------~
2500 r-----------------~~--~~----------~----------------------~
2000 ~1r--ir\1--------------------------------------------~~~~~!
i 1500 -ri hr-------------------------
J!! "3 \I)
1000 r---1I----------------------------------------------·-------~
500 r-----------------------------------------------------------~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-23
90
80 ~
70
60
~ -~ 50
E ~ 'c 40 III :s
30
20
ill
V~ -
10
0
..... -~ ......
--,---i i i
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
~ /~
---
i
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-24
Chloride in MW-24
80 r---------------------------------------------------------~
70 ,..---------
60 T1r-------.-il----------------------------.
~50 t-~~_=-irt----------------------------------~----------~ tiD .§. ~ 40 t-----~tl~--------------~~~----~I-------------~~--~~
"§ :c
u 30 t--------4~--------------------------------------------J
20 t------------------.-------------------------
10 r----------------------------------------------------------J
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-24
0.4 r --------------------------------------------------------.....
0.35 r --------·----------------------lt---l
0.3 n -----·--jl------------·------------·--,I-...L·
~ 0.25 Ir---Jt-T--------------------------I--~'--1
tiD .§. ~ 0.2 1""'-,----~'rI~~--_jt_--------------I------\-I
o :s
u:::: 0.15 1-... ------------li1r--\----::::----__ --~~-·--------1I
0.1 1---------=------~~f_ .... ----------1
0.05 ,-----------------------------------1
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-24
Sulfate in MW-24
3500 r-----------------------------------------------------------~
3000 -r----------------,----x------------I
2500 ~--~~(j~~~----~~---------------~~--~~~ .. ----~
:J' ~2000 t-----------------------------------J .§.
~ IV 3 1500 t----------------------------------------J
V)
1000 t---------------------------------------~
500 t------------------------------------------J
250
200
~ 150
~
E ~ ·c g 100
50
o
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-24
4
--~ -
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Nan-Detected Values
40
35
30
~ 25 -tl.O .§.
Q.l 20 'tl .~
0 :E u 15
10
5
0
~" ~ ..... ~
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
~ 0.3 -tl.O .§.
Q.l 0.25 :E 0 :s 0.2 u:::
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
~" ~ ..... ~
Time concentration plots for MW-25
Chloride in MW-2S
--r---
~ ~\:)IO
~~ ~ ..... '1>
~IO ~' ~~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-2S
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-25
Sulfate in MW-2S
1900 r -------------------------------.
1850 i-...... ----t-1k'---... -----------------------I
1800 r-~t1r----t-1r---t1r---------.-------------------------J
::::J ~ 1750 r--t-1r--t---~~-l~-jt---~~---------.I~-----------~ .s
~ .e ~ 1700 r-lt--~~-t-------~--~-iL--ir-~--------JL-l--------------~
1600 ,-------1t---------------~-----~-------------------~
1550
\:)" ~f:::Iro ~ ~ \:)q, ;:xf:::IOJ ~:$> ~f:::I ~...,. 'X~ t::.< ,,'1>~ ..: ~ "..:$ ~~ or.; ~ c.,e~ ~..:$ ~'1> ~'lj <::)/l} "..:$
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-2S
8 r---------------------------------------------------~
7 -t------------------'
::::J 5 .----------------------------------------~~--~~---J
}
§ 4 t-------------------------------------------------------~ ·c
III ~ 3 -t---------------------------------
2 r------------------------------------------------------------------~
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-26
Chloride in MW-26
90 ~--------------------------------------------------------~
80 t----------------------------------------------.----------JUU
70 t---------------------------------__ --------~~~---------L~
30 r-----------------------------------------------------------J
20 t----------------------------------------------------------J
10 r-------------------------------------------------------------J
O +-------~----~----_r----_r----~----~-----~~----~--~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-26
0.9 r----------~t_--------------------------------1
0.8 r--------~~-i_--------------------------------------1
0.7 t-------~------t---------------------------------~-------J
~ 0.6 ,---1"------+------------Q.O .§.
~ 0.5
o IE 0.4 f---------4t------------------..:..---------JUI
0.2 r-----------------------------~------------------------~---~
0.1 r-------------------------------------------------~
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-26
r--------------.-----------------------------------------------------~
Sulfate in MW-26
2500 r-----------------------------------------------------------~
2000 ~----=--~-.~
~ 1500 r-----------------------------------------------------------------J
lID .§.
~ ~ ~ 1000 r-------------~---------------------------------------------------~
500 r-----------.------------------------------------------------~
O +---~~--~------~----~----~--~r----~-----~--~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-26
140
120
100
::i -80 ~
E ::l ·c 60 IV ~
40
20
Sample Date
Detected Valueli
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
50
45
40
35
::J 30 "aD .§.
CII 25 ~ 0 ~ 20 u
15
10
5
0 I
\:)" ~ \.::>
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
::J ...... Il.O .§. 0.5
CII ~ 0 0.4 .
::J u:::
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
\:)" ~ \.::>
~<::>'o
~
\:)'0
~ ~~
Time concentration plots for MW-27
~ \~~
Chloride in MW-27
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-27
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-27
Sulfate in MW-27
600 r-------------------------------------------------------------~
500 r----------------------------------------------------------------J
400 r-.. ~~--~--------~~-----------=------------------------.---J
::i -a:o E i 300 t-----------------------------------------------~-----------------J
~ :i \I)
200 1------------
100 r-------------------------------------------.------------------~
0
!:)<.:> t.:f;JO ~ ~ !:)'b ::1\(;)0, t.:-$J ~ t<:"""" ~v ~ ~ t<: ~'>¢O ';~ ~q \'li of,; ~ ~'li ~'li <:.)'li of,; \~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-27
34
33
32
::i ~ 31
E ::l '2 30 ~ =>
29
28
27
!:)<.:> t.:(;)fo !:)fo t<:(;)/I, ~ ~ \~ ~'li <:.)'li of,;
Sample Date
Detected Values:
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-28
Chloride in MW-28
160
140
120
~ 100 -QO
.§.
QI 80 ~ 0 :c u 60
40
20
0
~" do ~ ~ ~ .... 'b~ .... .;:> ~q
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-28
0.8 ,------------------------------
0.7 ~=---------------------------------------------------~------J
0.6 +----1~~
~ 0.5 r---------------------------------------------------------------~
QO
.§. ~ 0.4 t-----------------------------------------------------------------J
o ::l ~ 0.3 t----------------------------------------------------------------J
0.2 t--------------------------------------------------------J
0.1 t--------------------------------------------------------J
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
~ -tI.O
Time concentration plots for MW-28
Sulfate in MW-28
3000 r-------------------------------------------------------------~
2500 r---~----~~~--~~--------------~------------------------~
2000 r-------------------------------,------"----------------~--------J
E i 1500 t-------------------------------------------------------------~
J!! -;
V)
1000 r---------------------------------------------------------------J
500 r----------------------------------------------------------~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-28
6 r-------------------------------------------------~
5 r------.--------------------------------------~~
4 t-~~t-1r----~~--------------------------------~
~ ~
§ 3 t-----------~~-------=--~------~---------------=~~~
"2
~ ::> 2 t---------------------------~--------------------~
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-29
Chloride in MW-29
45
40
35
30
::i' -,g 25
GI 't:I '§ 20
:i: u
15
10 ·
5
0
5:)<' 5:)'0 ~ f:f ~'1><: f:f 'i;s \'l>
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-29
1.2 r ------------------------------.
..... 0.8 r~~~-r-------l~~~~ ..... --.;e;;;;;;;;;:::::=--7~;;J
Qo
E. ~ 0.6 t-------.----------------------------------------------------------J
o ;:,
i!:
0.4 1 ----------------------------.-J
0.2 ,-----------------------------J
o +------.------r--~------r------._----~-------
Sample Date
Detected Value!>
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
3000
2950
2900
2850
:J -r 2800
~ ~ 2750 :;
\I)
2700
2650
2600
2550
~<, ~ ...,.;s
60
50
40
:J -bII -= E 30 ::s 'c III :;
20
10
j
.r
0
~<, ~ ...,.;s
Time concentration plots for MW-29
~(::,'o ~ ...,~<:f ~7i
....... ~ .,.
I I
Sulfate in MW-29
~ (f 0
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-29
...... .A\,
I I
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
........ -
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-30
Chloride in MW-30
180
160
140
120
:J" -,g 100
cu " "§ 80 T-------------------------------------------------------------~ ::E u
60
40
20
0
~<, f:)'o &-,i" ~ f.: '>~~ ,>V ..,.~ ~o
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-30
0.6 ,-----------------------------
0.5 r-----.r---------,---------------1
0.4 Mr----r---....::::!!I,------------:#-----------I
:J" 'aD .s ~ 0.3 I--------------..... ~--------------------------------J
o ~ u:::
0.2 I------~-----------------------
0.1 r--------------------------------------------------------J
0
f:)<' f:)'o &-~ f:)CO o:X~O) f.:""~ (f~ ~..., ~ f.: '>~~ (:f~ ~ ~v '>v ..,.~ 0 ..,.v ~'" ~'" ~Il/ c.,eq \V
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
~.~
I.n--~-' 1.11:,&&
~~
Time concentration plots for MW-30
Sulfate in MW-30
1200
1000
800
~ ...... QO .s 600 ~ ~ :;
V)
400
200
a
~<, ~'):)fo &> &> ~'b ;:1\(;:)0, ~o$' eJo$' !)."" ~.y, ~ \..::i ~~ \'l)<f (f ~ 0 ~..::i ~'l) ~'t> ()'l' "e~ \..::i
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-30
12 r---------------------------------------------------------~
10 t-----------------------~----------------.------~~--~
...J ~
§ 6 ~----------------------~--------------~~--------~
·2
~ :::> 4 t---.--------------------------------------------~
2t---------------------------------------------------J
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-31
Chloride in MW-31
200
180
160
140
~ 120
Il.D .§.
Qj 100 ~ 0 ::c 80 u
60
40
20
0
!;:)'> ~r:::,V:J ~ \V 'fI?-'J
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-31
1.4 r ------------------------------
l.2 ,-----.r---------..,...----------------I
::J -~ 0.8 t---------------------------~i-~~--------~--~~~~~~~~~
Qj ~ g 0.6
u:::
0.4 t---------------------------~f-------------------------
0.2 ,----------------------------------------------------1
0 .......--i -
!;:)'> !;:)V:J ~ ~ !b o:\r:::,O) ~""r:::, ~ :-,."" ~v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t;;j
\V 'fI?-'J OV (J \~ '!?-V ~~ ~~ <:;>'l/ ",e'J \V
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-31
Sulfate in MW-31
600 r------------------------------------------------------------
400 r-----------------------------------------------------------~
:::r 'Qo
E i 300 r-----------------------------------------------------------------~
~ :;
V)
200 t----------------------------.
100 r-------------------------------------------------------------~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-31
10 r-----------------------------------------------------~
9 r-----JM~------------.----------------------~--~
8 r---~--~=-------------------------------~~~-i
:::r 6 t----------------------------~----------------~Jl----------J 'Qo -= § s r---------------------------------------------------~
'c IU ~ 4 t---~---------------------------------------------------J
3 r-----------------------------------------------~
Sample Date
~---------------------------------------------~------------~
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-32
Chloride in MW-32
60
50
40
~ 'Qa .5-
CII 30 ~ 0 ::c u
20
10
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-32
0.4 ,-----------------------------.
0.35 r--------------:.------------------J
0.3 ~:-----------,-t\--A-·--....:..-------------I
~ 0.25
'Qa .5-:2 0.2 r--------~~---t~-..!L-\-~~ ..... ~~~.
o ::l u:: 0.15 r-------~~r-------------------J
0.1 ,-----------------------------1
0.05 ,------------------------------I
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-32
Sulfate in MW-32
3000 r-----------------------------------------------------------~
2000 t-------------------------------------------~----------------J
~ "Qa E i 1500 ;------------------------------------1
J!! ~ 11'1
1000 t-------------~------------------------------------------------J
500 r---------------------------------------------------------~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-32
7 r-----------------------------------------------~
6 r-------------~----------------------------------~
5 t-------------i-,---------------------------------~
..... ~4 t-------It---Jf--~~------------------------------~
E :::l .~ 3 t--------1-~~--~------~~~----------------------------------~ ~
2 ~~------------------------------~~~~~~~--~
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
80
70
60
~ 50 -~
C1/ 40 ~ o ::c u 30
20
10
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
~ 'iio ..§. 0.25
C1/ 't:J ':5 0.2
~ i:i:
0.15
0.1
0.05
o
Time concentration plots for MW-35
Chloride in MW-35
\ ----\ /' .....
V
4"'-~
~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-35
~ -
i i i
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
...........
i
~
i i
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
~ 'Qa E
3000
2500
2000 \
Time concentration plots for MW-35
Sulfate in MW-35
---/
\ /
V i 1500
J!! '3 \I)
~ -III) ..=
E ::J ·c
nI ~
1000
500
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-35
30 r-------------------------------------------------------
25 t\~----------------~---------------------~---------=~
20
15
10
5
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
80
70
60
,..
::::;-50
tiD .§.
Qj 40 "tl .~
I
:E u 30
20
10
I o I
0.335
0.33
0.325
::::;-0.32
tiD .§.
Qj 0.315 :2 (;
::l u:: 0.31
0.305
0.3
0.295
~~~
~..:>
i
~~
c.,e'i
Time concentration plots for MW-36
i
~ t? 0
Chloride in MW-36
~
~ ~
i I I I
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-36
~~~
~o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
...
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Va'lues
Time concentration plots for MW-36
Sulfate in MW-36
2900 r-----------------------------------------------------------~
2850 r-------~~~--------------------------------------------------J
::i' 2800 t--,-------3i~----.:..-------------------l tiD .§.
~ ~ ~ 2750 ]r-----------------~~------------------------------J
2700 r--------------------------~~::;;;;~----~~~-------~
2650 +------.------.------.-----.------.-----~------~----_.----~
~..."..." ~.;s
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-36
27
26.5
26 /
::i' 25.5 /
/ tiD ~
E 25 ::s ·c E ;:) 24.5
24
23.5
/
/ ,.. / ~ -.....
23 I I
..." ~..." ~.;s
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Values
~ ...... Q.O .§.
QI "'C .~
:c u
~ "aD .§.
QI
:2 0 :::J u::
Time concentration plots for MW-37
Chloride in MW-37
60
50
40
30
20
10
o +-----~----~--~~--~----~----~--.--~----~----~
0.35
0.3
0.25 "" "-......
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
o
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-37
--
~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012
~
Detected Value!'
• Non-Detected Va'lues
Time concentration plots for MW-37
Sulfate in MW-37
2750 r-----------------------------------------------------------~
2700 r-----------------------------------------------------------~
2650 r-----------------------------------------------------------~~
::J
Q:o 2600 r------J~-~~--------------------~t--J .s
~ ~ ~ 2550 r-----~r--------------~~-------------------------J~---J
2500 r-~~----------------------------~~~~------------,t--------j
2450 ~--------------------------------------------------~----------J
2400 +------r------r-----.-r----~r_----,_----~------~----~.------J
"" ~"" ~.;s
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-37
20
18
16
14
~ ~
::J 12 Q:o
~ .-.fI ---............ ~ ........
E 10 := 'c IV :; 8
6
4
2
o
Sample Date
Detected Values
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2012 • Non-Detected Va'lues
TabJ
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Monday, November 26, 2012 12:54 PM
'[e-mail]'
'Phillip Goble'; Thomas Rushing iii; Harold Roberts; David Frydenlund; Jo Ann Tischler; David
Turk; N. Tanner Holliday; Garrin Palmer; Jaime Massey
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2012 03 Groundwater Monitoring
C12080469.csv; C12080830.csv; C12090804.csv; 1207185.csv; 1208066.csv;
C12070448.csv; C12070741.csv; C12080143.csv
Attached to this e-mail is an electronic copy of laboratory results for groundwater monitoring conducted at the White
Mesa Mill during the third quarter of 2012, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
1