DRC-2013-001409 - 0901a06880352aa3

ENERGYFUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.energyfuels com
Febniary 26,2013 >
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 4th Quarter 2012 Groundwater Monitoring Report
Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Groundwater Monitoring Report for the 4th Quarter
of 2012 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004, as well as two CDs each
containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truly,
^ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Jo Ann Tischler
Director, Compliance
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Katherine A. Weinel
Central Files
4
z;.·~ .~ERGYFUELS
February 26, 2013
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
3039742140
www.energyfuels.com
Re: Transmittal of 4th Quarter 2012 Groundwater Monitoring Report
Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Groundwater Monitoring Report for the 4th Quarter
of 2012 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004, as well as two CDs each
containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truly,
(1C.HL~ ~ ~;Y-F~LS REsOURCES (USA) INC.
JoAnn Tischler
Director, Compliance
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Katherine A. Weinel
Central Files
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
4th Quarter
(October through December)
2012
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
February 26, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING ....................................................................... 1
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ....................................... 1
2.1.1 Groundwater Compliance Monitoring .......................................................... 1
2.1.2 Accelerated Groundwater Monitoring .......................................................... 1
2.1.3 Background Well Monitoring ....................................................................... 2
2.1.4 Parameters Analyzed .................................................................................... 2
2.1.5 Groundwater Head Monitoring ..................................................................... 2
2.2 Field Data ............................................................................................................. 3
2.3 Laboratory Results -Quarterly Sampling ............................................................ 3
2.3.1 Copy of Laboratory Results .......................................................................... 3
2.3.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background ................................ 4
2.4 Laboratory Results -Accelerated Monitoring ..................................................... 4
2.4.1 Copy of Laboratory Results .......................................................................... 4
2.4.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background ................................ 5
2.4.3 Compliance Status ........................................................................................ 5
2.5 Depth to Groundwater and Water Table Contour Map ........................................ 5
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION ....................................... 6
3.1 Field QC Samples ................................................................................................. 6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ...................................................................... 7
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ............................................................................. 7
3.4 Data Validation .................................................................................................... 7
3.4.1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation ...................................................................... 8
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................ 10
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ................................................................. 10
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist ...................................................................... 10
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation .............................................. ; ......................... 10
3.4.6 Trip Blank Evaluation ................................................................................. 11
3.4.7 QAlQC Evaluation for Routine Sample Duplicates ................................... 11
3.4.8 Radiologies Counting Error and Duplicate Evaluation .............................. 12
3.4.9 Other Laboratory QAlQC .............................. ; ............................................ 12
3.4.10 Miscellaneous Results .................................................................................... 14
4.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ...................................................................... 15
4.1 Identification and Definition of the Problem ..................................................... 15
4.2 Assignment of Responsibility for Investigating the Problem ............................ 15
4.3 Investigation and Determination of Cause of the Problem ................................ 15
4.4 Determination of a Corrective Action to Eliminate the Problem ....................... 16
4.5 Assigning and Accepting Responsibility for Implementing the Corrective ...... 16
4.6 Implementing the Corrective Action and Evaluating Effectiveness .................. 16
4.7 Verifying That the Corrective Action Has Eliminated the Problem : ................. 16
4.8 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period .................................. 16
5.0 TIME CONCENTRATION PLOTS ...................................................................... 17
6.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT ................................................... 17
7.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ................................................................ 18
1
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Well Sampling for the Period
Exceedances and Acceleration Requirements
GWCL Exceedances Under the August 24, 2012 GWDP
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Field Data Worksheets Quarterly Sampling
Tab C Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
Tab D Quarterly Depth to Water
Tab E Laboratory Analytical Reports -Quarterly Sampling
Tab F Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
Tab G Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
G-1A/B
G-2A/B
G-3A/B
G-4A/B
G-5A/B
G-6A/B
G-7A/B
G-8A/B
G-9A/B
Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
Holding Time Evaluation
Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
Analytical Method Check
Reporting Limit Check
Trip Blank Evaluation
QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Radiologies Counting Error
Laboratory Matrix QC
Tab H Kriged Current Quarterly Groundwater Contour Map and Depth Data
Tab I Groundwater Time Concentration Plots
Tab J CSV Transmittal Letter
11
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This is the Routine Groundwater Monitoring Report, as required under Part I.F.l of State
of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (the "GWDP") for the fourth
quarter of 2012 (the "quarter") for Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc's. ("EFRI's")
White Mesa Uranium Mill (the "Mill"). As required under Parts I.E. 1 , I.E.2 and I.E.S of
the GWDP this Report includes all recorded field measurements and laboratory analyses
for well monitoring conducted during the quarter.
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing
wells, chloroform contaminant investigation wells and nitrate contaminant investigation
wells is attached under Tab A. Groundwater samples and measurements were taken
during this reporting period (October through December), as discussed in the remainder
of this section.
2.1.1 Groundwater Compliance Monitoring
Groundwater samples and field measurements collected during the quarter included
quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated monitoring. Accelerated monitoring is discussed
below in Section 2.1.2. In the narrative in Sections 2 and 3 of this quarterly report,
samples classified as being collected quarterly include those wells which are sampled
every quarter and the wells sampled semi-annually. Wells which are sampled routinely
every quarter and semi-annually were analyzed for the parameters listed in Table 2 and
Part I.E. 1. c) 2) ii of the GWDP dated August 24, 2012.
Table 1 of this report provides an overview of all wells sampled during the current
period, along with the required sampling frequency applicable to each well during the
current monitoring period, the date samples were collected from each well, and the
date(s) analytical data were received from the contract laboratory(ies). Table 1 also
indicates which sample numbers are associated with the required duplicates.
2.1.2 Accelerated Groundwater Monitoring.
Accelerated monthly sampling was also performed (quarterly wells accelerated to
monthly), and results reported, for the wells indicated in Table 1. The accelerated
sampling frequency, analyte list and well list were determined based on the previous
analytical results as shown in Table 2.
1
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
Table 1 provides an overview of the wells sampled for the accelerated monthly program
along with the routine sampling frequency as well as the accelerated sampling frequency,
the date samples were collected from each well, the associated duplicates and the date( s)
which analytical data were received from the contract laboratory(ies).
2.1.3 Background Well Monitoring
A requirement was added to the GWDP on February 15,2011, which required the Mill to
begin quarterly sampling of wells MW-35, MW-36 and MW-37 to develop eight quarters
of background data. MW-35, which was installed in the third quarter 2010, has been
sampled quarterly since the fourth quarter of2010. With the fourth quarter 2012 sample,
nine full quarters of data have been collected for MW-35. Preliminary statistical analysis
of the MW-35 data showed extremes in the nickel and sulfate data. Per the logic flow
diagram included as Figure 17 of the New Wells Background Report (INTERA, 2008),
extreme values are excluded from the background calculations. The removal of the
extremes resulted in less than the eight required data points needed for background
calculations. DRC personnel agreed via telephone on February 20,2013 that EFRI should
delay the submission of the MW -35 background report until at least eight quarters of
statistically valid data, suitable for background calculations, were collected for all
constituents. DRC and EFRI agreed that the background report for MW-35 would be
submitted after the second quarter 2013 if at least eight quarters of data were collected for
every constituent by that time. If there are not eight data points for each constituent,
DRC and EFRI would discuss an alternate schedule or further actions.
MW-36 and MW-37, which were installed during the second quarter of 2011, were
sampled for the first time during the second quarter of 2011. Quarterly samples will
continue to be collected until 8 quarters of statistically valid data for all constituents are
available to complete the background report as required by the GWDP.
2.1.4 Parameters Analyzed
All routine quarterly and semi-annual groundwater monitoring samples were analyzed for
the parameters listed in Table 2 and Part I.E.1.c) 2) ii of the GWDP dated July 14, 2011.
The accelerated monitoring samples were analyzed for a more limited and specific
parameter list as shown in Table 2.
2.1.5 Groundwater Head Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells and/or piezometers, pursuant
to Part I.E.2 of the GWDP dated August 24,2012:
• The quarterly groundwater compliance monitoring wells (including, MW -34).
• Existing monitoring well MW -4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation
wells.
2
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
• Piezometers -P-l, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-5.
• Nitrate monitoring wells.
• The DR piezometers which were installed during the Southwest Hydrogeologic
Investigation.
• In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in
conjunction with sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and
accelerated efforts, regardless of the sampling purpose.
All water levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded
within 5 calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the
summary sheet under Tab D.
2.2 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all field data sheets recorded in association with the
quarterly effort (sampled in May) for the groundwater compliance monitoring wells
referred to in paragraph 2.1.1, above. Sampling dates are listed in Table 1. Tab B also
includes field data sheets for general monitoring wells MW-20 and MW-22.
Attached under Tab C are copies of all field data sheets recorded in association with the
October and December 2012 accelerated monitoring and sampling efforts.
2.3 Laboratory Results -Quarterly Sampling
2.3.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
All analytical results are provided by one of the Mill's two contract analytical
laboratories GEL Laboratories, Inc. ("GEL") or American West Analytical Laboratories
("A W AL").
Table 1 lists the dates when analytical results were reported to the Quality Assurance
("QA") Manager for each well.
Results from analysis of samples collected under the GWDP (i.e., all regular quarterly
. and semi-annual samples) are provided in Tab E. Also included under Tab E are the
results of analyses for duplicate samples as identified in Table 1.
The laboratory report dates for samples collected for the October and December
accelerated sampling (i.e. quarterly accelerated to monthly) are provided in Table 1.
Results from analysis of samples collected for the October and December accelerated
sampling (i.e. quarterly accelerated to monthly) are provided in Tab F. Also included
3
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
under Tab F are the results of analyses for duplicate samples for this sampling effort, as
identified in Table 1.
Copies of laboratory QAlQuality Control ("QC") Summaries are included with the
reported data under their corresponding Tabs.
2.3.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background
Under the GWDP dated August 24, 2012, background groundwater quality has been
determined on a well-by-well basis, as defined by the mean plus second standard
deviation concentration or the equivalent. GWCLs that reflect this background
groundwater quality have been set for all compliance monitoring wells except MW-35,
MW-36, and MW-37. It is important to note that the GWDP dated February 15, 2011
also set GWCLs for MW-35. The GWCLs for MW-35 have been set at one-quarter of
the Utah Groundwater Quality Standard ("GWQS"), pending determination of
background for the well, and are not based on eight quarters of data from that well. A
background report for MW-35 will be completed after the collection of eight quarters of
statistically valid data for all constituents.
Exceedances of the GWCLs during the preceding quarter determined the accelerated
monthly monitoring program implemented during this quarter as noted in Tables 1 and 2.
Exceedances of the GWCLs for this quarter are listed in Table 2 for sampling required
under the revised GWDP dated August 24, 2012. Table 3 shows the accelerated
sampling program which started in the second quarter 2010 and shows the results and
frequency of the accelerated sampling conducted since that time.
It should be noted, however, that, because the GWCLs have been set at the mean plus
second standard deviation, or the equivalent, un-impacted groundwater would normally
be expected to exceed the GWCLs approximately 2.5% of the time. Therefore,
exceedances are expected in approximately 2.5% of all sample results, and do not
necessarily represent impacts to groundwater from Mill operations. In fact, more frequent
sampling of a given analyte will increase the number of exceedances due to statistical
variation and not due to Mill activity. Additionally, given the slow velocity of
groundwater movement, accelerated sampling at monthly is resampling of the same water
and leads to repeat exceedances for accelerated constituents not due to Mill activities, but
due to repeat sampling of the same water.
2.4 Laboratory Results -Accelerated Monitoring
2.4.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
The analytical results for the accelerated monthly monitoring of the various constituents
in certain monitoring wells for the quarter are provided at Tab F.
4
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
2.4.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background
As a result of the issuance of a revised GWDP on January 20, 2010, which sets revised
GWCLs, all requirements to perform accelerated monitoring under Part I.G.1 of the
previous GWDP ceased effective on January 20, 2010, and the effect of the issuance of
the revised GWDP was to create a "clean slate" for all constituents in all wells going
forward.
This means that accelerated monitoring during this quarter was required under the revised
GWDP for only those constituents that exceeded the GWCLs since January 20,2010.
2.4.3 Compliance Status
Analytes which have exceeded the GWCLs set forth in the GWDP are summarized in
Table 2. The analytes which exceeded their respective GWCLs during the quarter will be
sampled on an accelerated schedule as noted in Table 2. Analytes which exceeded their
respective GWCLs during 2010 are currently sampled on an accelerated schedule. A
review of the accelerated data collected during the quarter indicate that several analytes
have exceeded their respective GWCLs for two consecutive sampling periods as reported
in EFRI's letter to DRC on February 15, 2013. Table 3 summarizes the results of the
accelerated sampling program from first quarter 2010 through fourth quarter 2012.
Part I.G.1 c) of the GWDP states, with respect to exceedances of GWCLs, "that the
Permittee shall prepare and submit within 30 calendar days to the Executive Secretary a
plan and a time schedule for assessment of the sources, extent and potential dispersion of
the contamination, and an evaluation of potential remedial action to restore and maintain
groundwater quality to insure that Permit limits will not be exceeded at the compliance
monitoring point and that DMT or BAT will be reestablished." EFRI submitted an
exceedance notice on February 15, 2013 for the fourth quarter 2012 results. The
summary in the Exceedance Notice includes, for each exceedance, a brief discussion of
whether such a plan and schedule is required at this time in light of other actions
currently being undertaken by EFRI, as determined by DRC Staff and stated in
teleconferences with EFRI on April 27 and May 2, 2011 and the Stipulated Consent
Agreement ("SCA") dated July 12, 2012.
2.5 Depth to Groundwater and Water Table Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the quarter (shown as depth to
groundwater in feet) is included under Tab D. The data from Tab D has been interpreted
(kriged) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under Tab H.
The water table contour map provides the location and identity of all of the wells and
piezometers for which depth to groundwater is recorded. The groundwater elevation at
each well and piezometer, measured in feet above mean sea level, and isocontour lines to
delineate groundwater flow directions observed during the quarter's sampling event are
displayed on the map.
5
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION
The Mill QA Manager performed a QAlQC review to confirm compliance of the
monitoring program with requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA
includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures,
an analyte completeness review, and quality control review of laboratory data methods
and data. Identification of field QC samples collected and analyzed is provided in
Section 3.1. Discussion of adherence to Mill sampling Standard Operating Procedures
("SOPs") is provided in Section 3.2. Analytical completeness review results are provided
in Section 3.3. The steps and tests applied to check laboratory data QAlQC are discussed
in Sections 3.4.4 through 3.4.10 below.
The Analytical Laboratories have provided summary reports of the analytical QAlQC
measurements necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental
Laboratory Accreditation Conference ("NELAC") certification and reporting protocol.
The analytical laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports, including copies of the Mill's Chain
of Custody and Analytical Request Record forms for each set of Analytical Results,
follow the analytical results under Tabs E and F. Results of review of the laboratory
QAlQC information are provided under Tab G and discussed in Section 3.4, below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following field QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the
analytical laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field
sampling program:
Two duplicate samples were collected during quarterly sampling as indicated in Table 1.
The QC samples were sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same
parameters as permit-required samples.
One duplicate sample was collected during each month of accelerated sampling as
indicated in Table 1. The QC samples were sent blind to the analytical laboratory and
analyzed for the same accelerated parameters as the parent sample.
Five trip blanks were provided by A W AL and returned and analyzed with the quarterly
monitoring samples.
One trip blank per month was provided by A W AL and returned and analyzed with the
accelerated monthly monitoring samples.
Rinsate samples were not collected during the quarter because all equipment used during
sample collection was dedicated and did not require decontamination. All wells except
MW-20 and MW-37 have dedicated pumps for purging and sampling and as such no
rinsate blanks samples are required. MW-20 and MW-37 were sampled with a
disposable bailer and no rinsate blank was required. A deionized field blank (DIFB) was
not required because equipment decontamination was not required and deionized water
6
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
was not used during this sampling event.
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the existing sampling SOPs, the QA
Manager observed that QAlQC requirements established in the QAPs were being adhered
to and that the SOP's were implemented, except as described below.
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for the quarterly and semi-annual wells were
performed. The accelerated sampling for the semi-annual wells (semi-annual to
quarterly) was completed as required by the GWDP and as shown in Tables 2 and 3. The
accelerated quarterly sampling (quarterly to monthly) required for this quarter, as shown
in Tables 2 and 3, was performed as required with one exception as noted below.
The monthly accelerated sampling program shown on Tables 2 and 3 is required as a
result of exceedances in quarterly wells reported during sampling in first, second and
third quarter 2012. The accelerated monthly samples which were required due to
exceedances reported for first and second quarter 2012 were collected commencing in
third quarter 2012. The monthly samples required due to exceedances reported in third
quarter were collected commencing with the first quarter sampling event in February
2013. DUSA intended to commence the monthly sampling for the third quarter
exceedances (selenium in MW-31) in December 2012, which was the first monthly
sampling event after the receipt of the third quarter 2012 data. However, although the
data were reviewed, the information was not communicated to the Mill Staff in sufficient
time to allow for the collection of the samples before the end of the fourth quarter 2012
or in the January 2013 monthly sampling events. Corrective actions are described in
more detail in Section 4 of this report.
It is important to note that although two required data points were missed, there is no
delay in the implementation of compliance actions. Selenium in MW -31 has exceeded
the GWCL in two successive quarterly sampling periods (third and fourth quarter 2012)
and, as a result, a 30 day plan and time schedule is required to be submitted per the
GWDP. The missed data points did not delay that submission or the schedule in any
way, and there is no adverse effect on the compliance actions required by EFRI. The
March 15, 2013 due date for the plan and time schedule was not affected by the absence
of the December 2012 and January 2013 data.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAPs and GWDP identify the data validation steps and data quality control checks
required for the groundwater monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements,
the QA Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QAlQC evaluation, a
receipt temperature check, a holding time check, an analytical method check, a reporting
limit check, a trip blank check, a QAlQC evaluation of routine sample duplicates, a
7
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\20l2 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
QAlQC evaluation of accelerated sample duplicates, a gross alpha counting error
evaluation and a review of each laboratory's reported QAlQC information. Each
evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results
of each test are provided under Tab G.
3.4.1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their
adherence with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of
information: the Field Data Sheets and the Quarterly Depth to Water summary sheet.
Review of the Field Data Sheets addresses well purging volumes and the stability of the
following field parameters (based upon the purging method chosen): conductance, pH,
temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Stability of field parameters and well
sampling techniques are dependent on the purging technique employed. Review of the
Depth to Water data confirms that all depth measurements were conducted within a five-
day period. The results of this quarter's review are provided in Tab G.
There are three purging strategies specified in Revision 7.2 of the QAP that are used to
remove stagnant water from the casing during groundwater sampling at the Mill. The
three strategies are as follows:
1. Purging three well casing volumes with a single measurement of field parameters
2. Purging two casing volumes with stable field parameters (within 10% RPD)
3. Purging a well to dryness and stability (within 10% RPD) ofa limited list offield
parameters after recovery
During both the fourth quarter sampling event and the two monthly events, the purging
technique used was two casing volumes with stable field parameters (pH, Conductivity,
Redox, temperature and turbidity) except for the following five wells that were purged to
dryness: MW-03A, MW-20, MW-23, MW-24, and MW-37.
Based upon the review of the Field Data Sheets, all quarterly and semi-annually sampled
locations conformed to the QAP requirement for purging using the two casing volume
technique except for MW-03A, MW-20, MW-23, and MW-37. These wells were
evacuated to dryness before two casing volumes could be removed. MW -37 has
insufficient water to purge using a pump. Due to the small volume of water present, this
well is purged and sampled using a disposable bailer. MW-37 conformed to the QAP,
Revision 7.2 requirement for sampling low yield wells which includes the collection of
three field parameters (pH, specific conductance ["conductivity"] and temperature)
immediately prior to and immediately following sample collection. Stabilization of pH,
conductivity and temperature were within the QAP, Revision 7.2 required 10% RPD.
Review of field sheets indicated that MW-24 was purged dry after two casing volumes
were removed. Because this well was purged dry, the requirements for sampling low
yield wells which includes the collection of three field parameters (pH, specific
conductance ["conductivity"] and temperature) immediately prior to and immediately
8
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
following sample collection was employed. Stabilization of pH, conductivity and
temperature were within the QAP, Revision 7.2 required 10% RPD.
Additionally, two casing volumes were not purged from MW-26, prior to sampling
because MW-26 is a continuously pumped well. If a well is continuously pumped, it is
pumped on a set schedule per the remediation plan and is considered sufficiently
evacuated to immediately collect a sample; however, if a pumping well has been out of
service for 48 hours or more, EFRI will follow the purging requirements outlined in
Attachment 2-3 of the QAP.
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP, Revision 7.2 requirements
resulted in the observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Attachment 2-3
specifically state that field parameters must be stabilized to within 10% over at least two
consecutive measurements. The QAP Attachment 2-3 states that turbidity should be less
than 5 NTU prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a higher
turbidity. The QAP Attachment 2-3 does not require that turbidity measurements be less
than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such the noted observations regarding turbidity
measurements greater than 5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• Turbidity measurements were less than 5 NTU for all of the quarterly and semi-
annual wells except MW-01, MW-12, MW-19, MW-20, MW-22, MW-23, MW-
29, MW-32 and MW-37. Per the QAP, Revision 7.2, Attachment 2-3, Turbidity
measurements prior to sampling were within a 10% RPD for all quarterly and
semi-annual wells except MW-20, MW-23, MW-24, and MW-37. In all instances
these wells were purged to dryness either before two casing volumes were
removed or immediately after two casing volumes were removed (MW-24).
Because these wells were purged to dryness, per the QAP, Revision 7.2
Attachment 2-3 turbidity is not required to be measured. The turbidity
measurement is provided for information purposes only.
• Turbidity measurements were less than 5 NTU for all of the October and
December accelerated sampling wells except MW-25 in the October and
December monthly events. As previously stated, the QAP does not require that
turbidity be less than 5 NTU. Turbidity measurements prior to sampling were
within a 10% RPD for all accelerated sampling wells
All other field parameters (conductance, pH, redox potential, and temperature) for all
wells were within the required RPD for the quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated
sampling.
During review of all of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel
consistently recorded depth to water for the quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated
sampling programs to the nearest 0.01 foot.
EFRI's letter to DRC of March 26, 2010 discusses further why turbidity does not appear
to be an appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to DRC's
9
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
subsequent correspondence dated June 1, 2010 and June 24, 2010, EFRI has completed a
monitoring well redevelopment program. The redevelopment report was submitted to
DRC on September 30, 2011. DRC responded to the redevelopment report via letter on
November 15, 2012. Per the DRC letter dated November 15, 2012, the field data
generated this quarter are compliant with the turbidity requirements of the approved
QAP.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample
holding time checks are provided under Tab G. All samples were received and analyzed
within the required holding time.
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement
in Table 1 that samples be received at 6°C or lower. Sample receipt temperature checks
are provided under Tab G. All quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated samples were
received within the required temperature limit.
As noted in Tab G, four groups of samples for tin analyses only were shipped without
using ice. Per Table 1 in the approved QAP, samples submitted for metals and gross
alpha analyses do not have a sample temperature requirement.
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by both laboratories were checked against the required
methods specified in the QAP. Analytical method check results are provided in Tab G.
The review indicated that all quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated samples were
analyzed in accordance with Table 1 of the QAP.
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits reported by both laboratories were checked against
the reporting limits specified in the QAP Table 1. Reporting limit evaluations are
provided in Tab G. All analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting
limits except that several sets of quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated sample results
had the reporting limit raised for at least one analyte due to matrix interference and/or
sample dilution as noted in Section 3.4.9. In all cases the reported value for the analyte
was higher than the increased detection limit.
It should be noted that in the GEL data, the reporting limit is shown under the heading
"CRDL" (client required reporting limit) in the hardcopy data packages included in
Tabs E andF.
10
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
In several instances GEL could not meet the QAP-required RL (shown as CRDL) for the
metals analyses due to severe cation interferences present in the samples. GEL had to
dilute the samples to remove the interferences which raised the RLs for metals with no
reported detections. In order to meet the QAP-required RLs, aliquots of the problematic
samples were shipped to A W AL from GEL for analysis of the metals with raised RLs.
The A W AL analyses were acceptable and the RLs meet the QAP requirements. Only the
A W AL data are included for the metals in these samples as the GEL analyses are
considered invalid since they do not meet the QAP requirements.
The samples and metals which were shipped to A W AL are as follows:
• MW -22 -arsenic
• MW-25 -tin
• MW-27 -tin
• MW-28 -molybdenum, tin, zinc
• MW-30 -tin
• MW-35 -tin, zinc
• MW-37 -iron, manganese, molybdenum, zinc
3.4.6 Trip Blank Evaluation
All trip blank results were reviewed to identify any VOC sample contamination which is
the result of sample handling and shipment. Trip blank evaluations are provided in Tab
G. All trip blank results associated with both the quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated
samples were less than detection level for all VOCs.
3.4.7 QAlQC Evaluation for Routine Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP state that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of
duplicate and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the
duplicate and original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured
results are less than 5 times the required detection limit. This standard is based on the
EPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for
all duplicate pairs for all analytes regardless of whether or not the reported concentrations
are greater than 5 times the required detection limits; however, data will be considered
noncompliant only when the results are greater than 5 times the required detection limit
and the RPD is greater than 20%. The additional duplicate information is provided for
information purposes.
All duplicate results were within a 20% RPD in the quarterly and semi-annual samples
except selenium in duplicate pair MW -02/MW -65. Both of the sample results reported
for MW-02/MW-65 were not five times greater than the reporting limit of 5.0 and as such
the deviation from the 20% RPD requirement is acceptable. Results of the RPD test are
provided under Tab G.
11
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
All duplicate results were within a 20% RPD in the monthly accelerated samples except
thallium in duplicate pair MW-35/MW-65. Both of the sample results reported for MW-
35/MW-65 were not five times greater than the reporting limit of 0.5 and as such the
deviation from the 20% RPD requirement is acceptable. Results of the RPD test are
provided under Tab G.
During the review of the sample data, the QA Manager noted that GEL failed to report
the duplicate data for the October 2012 monthly sample event (MW-65). The QA
Manager noted that the duplicate and parent sample were both collected as required,
based on a review of the field data sheets, and submitted to the laboratory. The QA
Manager did note the duplicate was not recorded on the chain of custody. An
investigation by GEL noted that the duplicate sample label was misread and logged in as
an extra sample aliquot of MW -35 instead of MW -65. The error was corrected and the
duplicate was analyzed within the required holding time. This issue did not affect the
data usability. The laboratory has been cautioned to read all sample labels carefully, and
the Mill Field Personnel have been reminded to complete chain of custody documents
correctly. A corrective action is not necessary as no data were lost or compromised as a
result of this error.
3.4.8 Radiologies Counting Error and Duplicate Evaluation
Section 9.14 of the QAP require that all gross alpha analysis reported with an activity
equal to or greater than the GWCL, shall have a counting variance that is equal to or less
than 20% of the reported activity concentration. An error term may be greater than 20%
of the reported activity concentration when the sum of the activity concentration and
error term is less than or equal to the GWCL.
Section 9.4 of the QAP also requires a comparability check between the sample and field
duplicate sample results utilizing the formula provided in the text.
Results of quarterly, semi-annual, and accelerated radiologic sample QC are provided
under Tab G. All quarterly, semi-annual, and accelerated radiologic sample results met
the counting error requirements specified in the QAPs.
3.4.9 Other Laboratory QAlQC.
Section 9.2 of all revisions of the QAP require that the laboratory's QAlQC Manager
check the following items in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information
is correct and complete, (2) analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate
analytical laboratory procedures are followed, (4) analytical results are correct and
complete, (5) QC samples are within established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC
limits, (7) special sample preparation and analytical requirements have been met, and (8)
documentation is complete. In addition to other laboratory checks described above,
EFRI's QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items (5) and (6)) to confirm that
the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for spike duplicates are
within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative sufficiently explains
12
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are provided under
Tab G. All lab QAlQC results from both GEL and A W AL samples for compounds
regulated under the GWDP met these requirements. There were QC results which did not
meet laboratory established acceptance limits, as identified in Tab G and described
below.
Multiple sets of quarterly, semi-annual and accelerated sample results had the reporting
limit raised for at least one analyte due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution. In
all cases the reported value for the analyte was higher than the increased detection limit.
The check samples included at least the following: a method blank, a laboratory control
spike ("LCS"), a matrix spike ("MS") and a matrix spike duplicate ("MSD"), or the
equivalent, where applicable. It should be noted that:
• Laboratory fortified blanks are equivalent to LCSs.
• Laboratory reagent blanks are equivalent to method blanks.
• Post digestion spikes are equivalent to MSs.
• Post digestion spike duplicates are equivalent to MSDs.
• Laboratory Duplicates are equivalent to MSDs.
All qualifiers, and the corresponding explanations reported in the QAIQC Summary
Reports for any of the check samples for any of the analytical methods were reviewed by
the QA Manager.
The QAP, Section 8.1.2 requires that a MS/MSD pair be analyzed with each analytical
batch. The QAP does not specify acceptance limits for the MS/MSD pair, and the QAP
does not specify that the MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFRI samples only. Acceptance
limits for MS/MSDs are set by the laboratories. The review of the information provided
by the laboratories in the data packages verified that the requirements in the QAP to
analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not
require it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established
acceptance limits. The QAP does not require this level of review and the results of this
review are provided for information only.
The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the
MS/MSDs recoveries and the associated RPDs for all quarterly and semi-annual samples
were within acceptable laboratory limits for all regulated compounds except as indicated
in Tab G. The A W AL data recoveries and RPDs which are outside the laboratory
established acceptance limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data because the
recoveries and RPDs above or below the acceptance limits are indicative of matrix
interference. Matrix interferences are applicable to the individual sample results only.
The requirement in the QAPs to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was
met and as such the data are compliant with the QAPs.
The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the
MS/MSDs recoveries and the associated RPDs for all accelerated samples were within
13
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
acceptable laboratory limits for all regulated compounds except as indicated in Tab G.
The recoveries and RPDs which are outside of the laboratory established acceptance
limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data because the recoveries and RPDs
above the acceptance limits are indicative of matrix interference. The requirement in the
QAP to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such the data
are compliant with the QAP.
The QAP specifies that surrogate compounds shall be employed for all organic analyses
but the QAP does not specify acceptance limits for surrogate recoveries. The information
from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the surrogate recoveries for
all quarterly, semi:-annual and accelerated samples were within acceptable laboratory
limits for all surrogate compounds.
The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the LCS
recoveries for both the quarterly and accelerated samples were within acceptable
laboratory limits for all LCS compounds as noted in Tab G.
The QAP, Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a
method blank. All analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a blank sample
made and carried through all analytical steps. F or the Mill samples, a method blank was
prepared for all analytical methods. Per the approved QAP, contamination detected in
analysis of method blanks will be used to evaluate any analytical laboratory
contamination of environmental samples. QAP Revision 7.2 states that non-conformance
conditions will exist when contaminant levels in the samples( s) are not an order of
magnitude greater than the blank result. The method blanks for the quarterly samples and
the accelerated samples reported no detections of any analyte. Method blank results are
included in Tab E.
3.4.10 Miscellaneous Results
The GWDP Part I.E.l.d).ii requires that in addition to the parameters in Table 2, general
inorganic parameters will be reported for groundwater samples. The general inorganic
parameter list specified in the GWDP includes the calculation of total anions and total
cations. EFRI's former laboratory Energy Laboratories ("EL") has historically analyzed
all of the parameters needed for these calculations and reported calculation of the total
cations and total anions. In addition EL reported the calculated cation/anion balance,
calculated total dissolved solids ("TDS"), and calculated TDS and measured TDS ratio.
Cation/anion balance, calculated TDS, and ratio of the calculated TDS to the measured
TDS are not required by the GWDP or QAP. EFRI changed laboratories for the fourth
quarter 2012 sampling events due to on-going quality problems with EL. The new
laboratory contracts resulted in the cations being reported by GEL and the anions being
reported by AWAL. In discussions with DRC on November 1,2012, EFRI noted that the
calculated cation/anion balance, calculated TDS, and ratio of the calculated TDS to the
measured TDS are not required and that the results would likely not be meaningful based
on data from two different laboratories. DRC requested that these calculations be
completed despite the lack of any requirement in the GWDP or QAP. EFRI has
14
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
completed the calculations for the quarterly groundwater samples as requested, using a
spreadsheet provided by A W AL. The calculated values are included in Tab E. As noted
by EFRI in the phone conversation on November 1, 2012, the data are not meaningful
due to the fact that they were generated by two different laboratories. The calculations
are not usable for any quality assessment purposes and are included at the request of
DRC.
4.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
Necessary corrective actions identified during the current monitoring period are described
below, in accordance with Part LF.l.e of the GWDP.
4.1 Identification and Definition of the Problem
The problem identified was:
Accelerated Monitoring Frequency
The accelerated monitoring conducted in the December 2012 and January 2013 monthly
sampling events did not include the collection of the analyte identified during the third
quarter 2012 (selenium in MW-31) in the accelerated monthly sampling.
It is important to note that although two required data points were missed, there was no
delay in implementation of compliance actions. Selenium in MW-31 has exceeded the
GWCL in two successive sampling periods (third and fourth quarter 2012) and a 30 day
plan and time schedule will be submitted as required by the GWDP. The missed data
points did not delay that submission or the schedule in any way, and there is no adverse
effect on the compliance actions required by EFRI.
4.2 Assignment of Responsibility for Investigating the Problem
The problem has been investigated by the Manager of Compliance and Licensing.
4.3 Investigation and Determination of Cause of the Problem
Accelerated Monitoring Frequency
The additional analyte for the monthly accelerated program identified during the third
quarter 2012 was inadvertently omitted from the December monthly sampling. The third
quarter data were reviewed for submission of the third quarter Exceedance Notice on
November 15, 2012. The results of the review and the additional monitoring
requirements were not communicated to the Mill Field Personnel by the Quality
Assurance Manager in time to be included in the monthly accelerated sampling events for
December 2012 and January 2013.
15
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
4.4 Determination of a Corrective Action to Eliminate the Problem
Accelerated Monitoring Frequency
The omission of the analytes from the December 2012 and January 2013 monthly events
has prompted the QA Manager to revise the exceedance tracking procedures and
procedures for review of the analytical data received from the laboratory. Additional
review using database reports will be implemented immediately upon receipt of the data
at the time the analytical data are uploaded to the database by the QA Manager.
Specifically, the QA Manager reviews all analytical data prior to loading into the
electronic database. After loading each analytical data set the QA Manager will query
the database for exceedances. Any exceedances identified in that analytical data set will
be forwarded to the Mill Field Personnel with the new accelerated frequency. Mill
Personnel will not schedule accelerated monthly sampling until the review of
exceedances has been completed.
4.5 Assigning and Accepting Responsibility for Implementing the Corrective
Action
It will be the responsibility of the QA Manager to implement the corrective action.
Accelerated Monitoring Frequency
The QA Manager is in the process of implementing the new exceedance tracking
procedure described above.
4.6 Implementing the Corrective Action and Evaluating Effectiveness
Accelerated Monitoring Frequency
Implementation of the corrective action for the accelerated monitoring program review
will begin with the next data sets received.
4.7 Verifying That the Corrective Action Has Eliminated the Problem
Verification of the accelerated sample frequency and analyte tracking procedure will
occur after the collection of the first quarter 2013 samples are collected and the data are
received.
4.8 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period
There were no corrective actions required in the third quarter 2012 report. No assessment
is required.
16
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
5.0 TIME CONCENTRATION PLOTS
Time concentration plots for each monitoring well for the following constituents:
chloride, fluoride, sulfate, and uranium, are included under Tab I. All data points
collected to date are reflected on the plots.
Time concentration plots included with quarterly groundwater reports prior to and
including first quarter 2012 did not include data which were determined to be outliers
using the statistical methods used for the background determinations at the Mill. Based
on conversations with DRC, all data have been included in the quarterly time
concentration plots since first quarter 2012. All future time concentration plots will
include all data points.
6.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFRI has provided to the Director electronic copies of all laboratory results from
groundwater quality monitoring conducted during the quarter in Comma Separated
Values ("CSV") format, from the analytical laboratories. A copy of the transmittal e-
mail is included under Tab J.
17
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
7.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. on February 26,
2013.
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
By:
David C. Frydenlund
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
18
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted.
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are
significant pena ies for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and
ent r knowing violations.
David C. Fry enlund
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
19
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\4th Qtr 2012 GW.doc
Tables
T hI I S a e : ummaryo f W 11 S li £ Q4 2012 e amp. ng or
Jf' 'rI§ : i'· t rJiit} ,w t •• ·,IV . w,~' it' z,", ~
I'll' , w
Normal Purpose for sampling~ Sam ,Ie ~j!,~ 'f1 .~WJ!l ~.fregq!J!cy .1 &: ,w,!.biip.yual1~!t. ,t.~ wA' ,"ff,'y .. 1'11: '" ,rc.~ Dati'lI1(,;Lab,BepoIt. w l'
.~ 'Ii! "\'" ''''''41 ~. Final Report Dale" . W0' Res{tbmissi~J:l Dates' w f ','.3'"" ,&<"'" 7 •. w. Y W ,.
MW-Ol Semi-annually. Semi -annually 1112712012 (12/12/12) [2/7/13] [12/19/12, 1/7/13, 1116/13, 1129/13]
MW-02 Semi-annually Semi-annually 1112712012 (12/12/12) [2/7/13] [12/19/12, 1/7/13, 1116/13, 1129/13]
MW-03 Semi-annually Semi -annually 1112812012 (12/12/12) [2/7/13] [12/19/12, 1/7/13, 1116/13, 1129/13]
MW-03A Semi-annually Semi -annually 1112912012 (12/12/12) [2/7/13] [12/19/12, 1/7/13, 1116/13, 1129/13]
MW-05 Semi-annually Semi -annually 1112712012 (12/12/12) [2/7/13] [12/19/12, 1/7/13, 1116/13, 1129/13]
MW-ll Quarterly Quarterly 1111212012 (11129/12) [1129/13] [12/5/12, 12/11112, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW-12 Semi-annually Semi-annually 1112712012 (12/12/12) [2/7/13] [12/19/12, 1/7/13, 1116/13, 1129/13]
MW-14 Quarterly Quarterly 11127/2012 (12/12/12) [2/7/13] [12/19/12, 1/7/13, 1116/13, 1129/13]
MW-15 Semi-annually Semi-annually 11/14/2012 (11129/12) [1129/13] [12/5/12, 12/11112, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW-17 Semi-annually Semi -annually 1112812012 (12/12/12) [2/7/13] [12/19/12, 1/7/13, 1116/13, 1129/13]
MW-18 Semi-annually Semi -annually 11/2612012 (12/12/12) [2/7/13] [12/19/12, 1/7/13, 1116/13, 1129/13]
MW-19 Semi-annually Semi-annually 12/1312012 (12/28/12) [1129/13] (12126/12, 12127/12) [12/26/12]
MW-20 Semi-annually Semi-annually 12/1212012 (12128/12) [1129/13] (12126/12, 12/27/12) [12/26/12]
MW-22 Semi-annually Semi-annually 1112612012 (12/12/12, 1130/12) [2/7/13] [12/19/12, 1/7/13, 1116/13, 1129/13]
MW-23 Semi-annually Semi-annually 12/512012 (12/18/12) [1129/13] [1/7/13, 1/16/13]
MW-24 Semi -annually Semi-annually 1112912012 (12/12/12) [2/7/13] [12/19/12, 1/7/13, 1116/13, 1129/13]
MW-25 Quarterly Quarterly 1111212012 (11129/12, 1130/12) [1129/13] [12/5/12, 12/11112, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW-26 Quarterly Quarterly 1111512012 (11129/12) [1129/13] [12/5/12, 12/11112, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW-27 Semi -annually Semi-annually 1111312012 (11129/12, 1130/12) [1129/13] [12/5/12, 12/11112, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW-28 Semi -annually Semi -annually 1111412012 (11129/12, 1130/12) [1129/13] [12/5/12, 12/11112, -1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW-29 Semi -annually Semi-annually 11114/2012 (11129/12) [1129/13] [12/5/12, 12/11112, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW-30 Quarterly Quarterly 11113/2012 (11129/12, 1130/12) [1129/13] [12/5/12, 12/11112, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
(11/15/12, 11120/12) [11113/12, 12/13/12,
MW-31 Quarterly Quarterly 1116/2012 (11127/12) [1129/12] 1/7/13, 1115/13]
(11115/12, 11120/12) [11113/12, 12/13/12,
MW-32 Semi-annually Semi -annually 111612012 (11127/12) [1129/12] 1/7/12, 1/15/13]
MW-35 Quarterly Background 1111312012 (11129/12, 1130/12) [1129/13] [12/5/12, 12/11112, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW-36 Quarterly Background 1111412012 (11129/12) [1129/13] [12/5/12, 12/11/12, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW-37 Quarterly Background 12/512012 (12/18/12, 1130/12) [1129/13] [1/7/13, 1116/13]
MW-65 1 per Batch Duplicate of MW -02 1112712012 (12/12/12) [2/7/13] [12/19/12, 1/7/13, 1116/13, 1129/13]
MW-70 1 per Batch Duplicate of MW -17 1112812012 (12/12/12) [2/7/13] [12/19/12, 1/7/13, 1116/13, 1129/13]
iii! .~w~ ".~ "'fI '~. ~. .",. v,i'41I-_¢ '''AI Acet'leratiif'octobe!MontaW ''W II: Wffi'dw ., "'!l1>' W ';P
:.w. .. ~ .. ~'" ,J!' ,# .m
MW-ll Monthly Accelerated 1012312012 [1129/13] [11113/12, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW-14 Monthly Accelerated 1012312012 [1129/13] [11113/12, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW~25 Monthly Accelerated 10/2212012 [1129/13] [11113/12, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW-26 Monthly Accelerated 1012412012 (2/11113) [1129/13] (1115/12) [11/13/12, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW-30 Monthly Accelerated 10/2312012 (2/11113) [1129/13] (1115/12) [11/13/12, 1/7/13, 1/15/13]
MW-31 Monthly Accelerated 1012212012 (2/11113) (1115/12)
MW-35 Monthly Accelerated 1012312012 [1129/13] [11113/12, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
MW-65 Monthly Duplicate of MW-35 10/2312012 [1129/13] [11113/12, 1/7/13, 1115/13]
T bl 1 S a e ummaryo fW llS e r £ Q42012 amplmg or
:"~ &! ! 1m
Normal w Porpo for saQlRling Samnle Jil~ .• '. ~ ~l!fL.a lfhiB~1l fI% IdEr\jqY~JJ~Jl~ " .% ktter., .1, .~ U~\!.~ 7b.'% W;'"X 'W r' ~,~, 'I~ >".j',ihal Reotili Date ~; •. w •. ~'h •• w. WW ,}i; Accele.rated December Montlily' .-. '" MW-ll Monthly Accelerated 12/2412012 [1/29/13]
MW-14 Monthly Accelerated 12/1812012 [1/29/13]
MW-25 Monthly Accelerated 12/24/2012 [1/29/13]
MW-26 Monthly Accelerated 1212412012 (1/8/13) [1/29/13]
MW-30 Monthly Accelerated 1212612012 (1/8/13) [1129/13]
MW-31 Monthly Accelerated 12/1812012 (1/17/13)
MW-35 Monthly Accelerated 12/1812012 [1/29/13]
MW-65 1 per Batch Duplicate of MW -30 1212612012 (1/8/13) [1/29/13]
Notes:
Date in parenthesis depicts the date that data were reported from American West Analytical
Laboratories.
Date in brackets depicts the date the data were reported from GEL Laboratories.
The large number of resubmissions by GEL were due to reanalysis and/or reporting corrections.
" ,
0.11 Www·:i:;.w .~~ ,y}il!,. .;r~
w:"ResuIJIbigsion Jj~tes ?# .
[1/16/13]
[1/7/13]
[1/16/13]
[1/16/13]
[1/16/13]
(1/2/13)
[1/7/13]
[1/16/13]
Table 2
MW-25 (Class III)
MW-26 (Class III)
MW-30 (Class II)
MW-31 (Class III)
-35 (Class II)
-15 (Class III) r------..:~S;:;~----t-~:;+-+---7~-+~~~~~~~~-+---$~~--I---~~~-J
(Class III)
(Class III)
MW-24 (Class III)
"1<11
Mo Well " QWCI;in
(W lass) Constituent Exceeding GWCL Current GWDE
,,41" '!¥Ji ',iii
MW-28 (Class III) Chloride (mgIL)
Manganese (ugIL)
Field pH (S.U.)
MW-29 (Class III) Field pH (S.U.)
Manganese (ugIL)
TDS (mgIL)
Iron (ugIL)
MW-32 (Class III) Gross Alpha minus Rn & U (pCi/L)
Field pH (S.U.)
Notes:
1 GWCL Values ru:.e taken from August ~4, 2012 versions of the G~P.
sample period.
1A JjP
105
1837
6.1-8.5
6.46-8.5
5624
4400
1869
3.33
6.4 -8.5
Highlighted text shows accelerated requirements resulting from Q4 2012 sampling event.
First Result
Exceeding the Routine Sample Accelerated Exceedance Start of Accelerated
Frequency Frequency Sample Eeriod Monitoring GWCL '~"* #k '
108 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
1850 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22012 Q32012
5.67 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
6.17 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q42010 Q22011
6140 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22012 Q32012
4600 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22012 Q32012
3010 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q32011 Q42011
5.4 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
6.03 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
137 133
2/2/10 4/21110 5121110 6116/10 7/20/10 8/25/10 9/8110 10/20/10 1lI1O/1O 12/15/10
6.53 7.2 NA NA NA NA 6.58 NA 6.36 NA
MW-25 (Class
ill) 2/26/2010 4/28/2010 NS NS NS NS 9/8/2010 NS 11/10/10 NS
1.3 2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.4
MW-26 (Class 2/2/10 4122110 5/21110 12/15110 ill) 6116/10 7/21/10 8116110 9/26/10 10/20/10 11/15/10
6.59 7.18 6.36 6.98 6.45 6.39 6.60 6.61 6.49 6.45
9.9 NR 2.2 12 24 45 5.5 16 1.2
16.1 15.8 17 15.3 7/21/10 16 8124110 16 15 15 15 16
MW-30 (Class 2/9/10 4127/10 12114/10 II) 5121110 6115/10 9/14/10 10119110 11/9/10
21.7 22.5 5/21110 23 6/15/10 21.1 7/21/10 20 8/24/10 22 21 10119110 20 20 20
MW-31 (Class
ill) 2/9/10 4/20110 9/13/10 1119/10 12114/10
NS 515/2010 NS NS NS NS NS NS 11/18/2010 NS
NS 4/27/10 NS NS NS NS NS NS 11/17110 NS
NS NA 5/3110 6.14 (6.25) NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9120110 6.39 NS NA 11119/10 6.35 NS NA
NA 6.23 (6.24) NA NA NA NA 6.42 NA 6.21 NA
MW-3A (Class
ill) NS NA 5/4110 1.0 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9/21110 NA NS NA 11/22/10 1.2 NS NA
NS NA 4/26/10 0.39 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 11111110 11.6 NS NA
4/27/10 NS NS NS NS 9/20/10 NS 11119/10 NS
NS MW-15 (Class 4/21110 NS ill) NS NS NS NS NS NS 11111110
MW-18 (Class
ill) NS 5/4/10 NS NS NS NS 9/15/10 NS llI18/10 NS
NA 3280 NA NA NA NA 3190 NA 3030 NA
MW-19 (Class
ill) NS NA 5/4/10 0.9 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9/15/10 NA NS NA 11118/10 1.2 NS NA
NA 2.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.4 NA
MW-23 (Class NS 4/22/10 NS NS ill) NS NS 9/14/10 NS 11122/10 NS
MW-24 (Class
ill) NS 5/6/10 NS NS NS NS 9/21110 NS 11117/10 NS
NA 5.91 (5.78) NA NA NA NA 6.64 NA 6.1 NA
NA 5.8 NA NA NA NA 5.9 NA 5.7 NA
MW -27 (Class
ill) NS 5/3/10 NS NS NS NS 9114/10 NS 11/12110 NS
NA 1.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.4 NA
MW-28 (Class NS 4119/10 NS NS NS NS 9/14110 NS 11112/10 NS ill)
NA 5.67 NA NA NA NA 5.91 NA 5.72 NA
MW-29 (Class NS 4/27/10 NS NS NS ill) NS NS NA NS 1119/10 NS
NA 6.82 NA NA NA NA NA 6.17 NA
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U NA 4.5 NA NA NA NA 2.9 NA 8.8 NA
MW-32 (Class (pCiIL)
11110/10 NS ill) NS 4/20/10 NS NS NS NS 9/13/10 NS
Field pH (S.U.) NA 6.03 NA NA NA NA 6.33 NA 6.05 NA
Notes:
GWCL values are taken from February 15,2011 version of GWDP.
NS = Not Required and Not Sampled
NR = Required and Not Reported
NA = Not Applicable
Exceedances are shown in yellow
Values in 0 parentheses are the field pH measurements for the resampled analyses.
(Class IT)
MW-14
(Class ill)
MW-25
(Class ill)
MW-26
(Class ill)
MW-30
(Class II)
MW-31
(Class ill)
MW-35
(Class II)
MW-3A
(Class ill)
(Class III)
MW-15
(Class ill)
MW-18
(Class III)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
217111
6.44
2/2/11
2/16/11
6.83
<1.0
15 2/1/11
NA 2/15/11
NA
NA 2116/11
NA 2/14/11
2/15/11
NS
2/15/11
NA
5110/2011 6/15/2011
5/ll/2011 6/20/2011
3/15/11 5/10/2011 6/20/2011
6.22 6.43
3.1 20
16
6/20/2011
NS NA NS
NA
NS NA NS
NS NA NS
NS NS
NS NS
NS NS
NA
7/5/2011
5.77
7/6/2011
7/6/2011
6.52 6.35
7 2.4
17 17
7/5/2011
22 22
NA NS NA
NA NA
NA NS NA
NA NS NA
NS
NS
NS
NA NA
8/3/2011
8/30/11
8/3/2011
10
14
20
8/2/2011 I-----t
8/10/2011 6.32
6.19
8/11/2011 NA
8/9/2011 0.5
3190
9/812011
9nt2011
91712011
9nt2011
9/6/2011
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
1----., ) 10/412011 11/9/2011 12112/2011
6.54 6.51 6.87
10/4/2011 1119/2011 121212011
0.9 1.3 2.3
I------t 10/12/2011 1------1 1119/2011 12/14/2011
6.71 6.82 6.75 7.1
7.9 2.6 8.9 11
16 16 16 16
10/4/2011 1118/2011 12/12/2011
21 21 21 21
12/12/2011
12/14/11
10/11/2011 NS 1-----1
10/5/2011 NS NS
NA 10/10/2011 6.53 (6.83) NS NA NS NA
NA 6.5 (6.92) NA NA
NA 1O/ll/2011 1.1 NS NA NS NA
NA 10/10/2011 4.52 NS NA NS NA
10/6/2011 NS NS
1-----1 10/10/2011 1-----1 NS NS
1-----1 10/1112011 1-----1 NS NS
NA 3220 NA NA
NA
MW-19
(Class ill) NS NA 2/2112011 NA NS NA 4/5/2011 0.5 NS NA NS NA NS NA 7/20/3011 NA NS NA 10/1212011 0.6 NS NA NS NA
NA NS NA 2.6 NA NA NA NS NA 4.0 NA NA
MW-23 NS 2/9/2011 NS (Class ill) NS NS NS NS 8/4/2011 NS 10/6/2011 NS
MW-24
(Class ill) NS 2/10/2011 NS NS NS NS 8/4/2011 NS 10/1112011 NS NS
NA 5.73 NA NA NA 6.45 NA 6.44 NA NA
NA 6 NA NA NA 6 NA 6.3 NA NA
MW-27
(Class ill) NS 2/9/2011 NS NS NS NS 8/8/2011 NS 10/5/2011 NS NS
NA 0.7 NA NA NA 0.8 NA 1.5 NA NA
MW-28 NS 2/14/2011 NS NS NS NS 8/8/2011 NS 10/5/2011 NS NS
(Class ill)
NA 5.69 NA NA NA 5.78 NA 6.07(6.11) NA NA
MW-29
(Class ill) NS NS NS NS NS 8/9/2011 NS 10/5/2011 NS NS
NA NS NA NA 6.45 NA NA NA 6.20 NA 6.52 NA NA
Gross Alpha minus Rn NA 1.5 NA 4.6 NA NA NA 1.9 NA 3.7 NA NA
MW-32 & U (pCiIL) 8/2/2011
(Class ill) NS 2/9/2011 NS 4/1/2011 NS NS NS NS 10/3/2011 NS NS
8/30/11 6.10 Field pH (S.U.) 6.4 -8.5 NA 5.99 NA 6.14 NA NA NA NA 6.35 NA NA (6.20)
Notes:
GWCL values are taken from July 14, 2011 version of GWDP.
NS = Not Required and Not Sampled
NR = Required and Not Reported
NA = Not Applicable
Exceedances are shown in yellow
Values in 0 parentheses are the field pH measurements for the resampled analyses.
Table 3 -GWCL Exceedances for Fourth Quarter 2012 under the August 24, 2012 GWDP
MW-ll (Class II) Manganese (ug/L) ;;'l 13i.29 1126/2012 102
"i3!'.;",,~
223030 Manganese (ug/L) MW-14 (Class ill) t--------f ....... ---.............. ,...-..,j
Field pH (S.U.)
Field pH (S.U.) tli.5 -8:$
MW-25 (Class ill) Cadmium (ug/L)
Uranium
Nitrate + Nitrite (as
N) (mg/L) 14 0.62
Uranium (ug/L) , 41.8 '0"",
Chloroform (ug/L) 70
MW-26 (Class ill) t-_C_h_Io_ri_de_(;...m..:;;g;.../L....;.)--I'-_5 ... 8.;;.~ .... I ........ '-:I
Field pH (S.U.)
Dichloromethane
(Methylene Chloride)
(ug/L)
6.74 -~i
1124/2012
112512012
1125/2012
Nitrate + Nitrite (as 2.5
I-_N~):....;(,-m-",-gl/L",-) _--;,. .......... :::-""-."..-~c ~;;;.;~-.""'""i' 112412012
MW-30 (Class II) Chloride (mg/L) ,~ 128'
Uranium (ug/L) 8:32 NS
Selenium (ug/L) 34 1/24/2012
Nitrate + Nitrite (as
N) (mg/L) , 5
IDS (mg/L) 132(:» .
MW-31 (Class ill) I--C-hl-or-id...;e-(.:::.m-g.:..../L-)--I"'--,-----1~4~3..:;."';,.......~
MW-35 (Class II)
!
Selenium (ug/L)
Sulfate (mg/L) : 1'<.
Manganese (ug/L)
Thallium (ugll)
Molybdenum (ug/L)'"
Gross Alpha minus
Rn & U (pCi/L)
Selenium (ug/L)
Uranium (ug/L)
Manganese (ug/L)
7;1
0.5
10 CA
'],.75
~.
7.5 -~
289 "
MW-Ol (Class II) Tetrahydrofuran (ug/L
Sulfate (mg/L)
U.5
838
MW -2 (Class ill) Gross Alpha minus
Rn & U (oCiIL) "1'. .J.2 .
Selenium (ug/L) . . 37 ,
MW -3 (Gass ill) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8~~ ..
Ruoride (Mg/L) 0.68 ::
Field pH (S.U.)
Sulfate (mg/L) 3640 MW-3A (Class ill) I----......:.......:::.......:.....---+....,....-;--..,,·,,:..;c.~...,....j
Nitrate + Nitrite (as ;\
N) (mg/L) ~ l.~l;i '
IDS (mg/L) 5805~\i' :;
Selenium (ug/L)
MW-5 (Class II) Uranium (ug/L).~ '"' 7.5 ',;''';'''
MW-12 (Class III) t-_F_ie_Id-'p'-H......:...(S_.U_.~) --I:-._6 ..... 5_-.".·~~.5:..". ~
Selenium (ug/L) 25 ""g
Selenium (ug/L) If8.~:,: MW-15 (Class ill) t----...;...:;;.......;.--I ................ ""'-~~ Iron (ug/L) 8x.,1~';' .
Thallium (ugll) " l.9h;ii1
MW -18 (Class III) t-_S_u_lf_at_e....;.(m...;g:;;../L...;)_+-_____ 19 .... 3 .... S""'.9.......,-I
Field pH (S.U.) 6.25":'8,5
IDS (mg/L) 3198.1;,1
1/24/2012
1/24/2012
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NA
6.36
6.63
NA
6.6
1.9
64.6
1900
68
6.59
13
17
124
NA
33.3
21
1360
155
NS
539
264
<0.50
<10
6.5
NA
16.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2113/2012
2/2112012
2/14/2012
2/1512012
2/2112012
2/15/2012
2/15/2012
212112012
2115/2012
2/1412012
2/1312012
2/14112
NS
2/22/2012
2/29/2012
3/112012
212812012
2/29/2012
2/22/2012
2/27/2012
154
1790
6.57
6.83
1.31
6.5
1.2
59.4
3300
40
6.72 (6.91)
(6.71)
24
17
126
7.42
35
21
1240
150
67.8
538
253
0.65
<10
4.1
19.7
24.7
NA
NA
NA
0.6
43.1
6.63
0.86
6.46
3020
NA
5690
65.8
18.6
6.81
27.2
NA
<30
3.63
1920
6.6
3230
311312012
3/14/2012
3/14/2012
3/1412012
3/14/2012
3/13/2012
3/13112
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
121 4/10/2012 132 5/812012 127
NA NA 2360 4/12/2012 1-----1 5/9/2012 1-----\
6.51 6.97 6.73
6.55 6.58 6.73
NA 4/912012 NA 5/2/2012 1.33
6.93 6.52 5.90
3 3.4 2.9
31.2 42.2 18.2
2900 2900 .1700
74 411112012 82 51712012 74
1-----\ 6/26/20121-----1
6.39 6.88 7.00 (7.01)
27 20 10
18 17 16
128 411012012 1-_1_2_8 ---i 5/2/2012 1--_1_24_', --I
8.38 7.84 6.81
39.5 39.1 32.3
22 21 20
1400 1380 1410
152 41912012 1---1-60--1 5/2/2012 1---1-51--1
NS NS 70.2
517 547 532
269 277 258
0.71 0.59 0.66
NA NA dO
4/10/2012 5/2/2012 6.2 4.1 4.5
NA NA 11.4
24.9 22.4 22.2
NA NA 176
NA NS NA 5/112012 10.3
NA NA 659
NA NS NA 5/912012 0.6
NA NA 52.8
NA NS NA 5/14/2012 6.67
NA NA 1.04
NA NA 6.68
NA NA 3220
NA NS NA 511512012 1.1
NA NA 5730
NA NA 85.1
NA NS NA 5/912012 1.23
NA NA 6.91 NS 1-----1 5110/20121-----1 NA NA 19.6
NA 152 1-----1 5/912012 1------1 NA NS NA NA <30
NA NA 3.51
NA NA 1790 1-----14/30/2012 .,..-----1 NA 6.59 NS NA
NA NA 3280
6/19/2012 122 7/1112012 135 81712012 166 9119/2012 130 10/23/2012 161 11112/2012 138 12124/2012 137 Quarterly
NA 2100 2300 2140 2110 1950 Quarterly
6/19/2012 t----t 7111/2012 81712012 1-----\ 9/18/2012 t-----\ 10/23/20121-----\ 11127/2012
2100
6.52
1211812012 1-----11-------1
6.90 6.89
6.99 6.88
6/18/2012 NA 7/10/2012 1.24
7.6 6.45
13 1.9
I----t 7/11/20121--_--1
66.0 28.4
2400 8/16/2012 970
6/19/2012 1-_8_5_+-7_/1_1_/2_0_12-+_7_8---1
711112012 7.10
7.00 8/1612012 (6.80)
16 8/16/2012 4.9
15 17
6/18/2012 t-_1_31_-t 7/10/2012 128
6/18/2012
6/29/2012
6/19/2012
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
7.8 7.64
37 38.5
21.6
1460
138
NA
497
304
<0.50
NA
4.9
7.0
22.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7/9/2012
7/10/2012
NS
7116/2012
7/18/2012
7/19/2012
21
1400
161
74
529
272
0.57
dO
3.5
15.9
24.5
NA
NA
NA
0.9
51.1
6.99
0.96
7.01
3700
NA
5720
99.3
NA 7116/2012 0.75
NA ~98 1-----17/17/20121-----1 NA 20.7
NA 120 1-----1 7117/2012 1-----1
NA <30
NA 3.73
NA 1900 1----\ 7/18/2012
NA 6.64
NA 3220
6.58 7.08 6.83
6.55 6.54 6.54
8/612012 NA 9/18/2012 NA 10/22/2012 NA 1111212012
6.72 6.01 6.37
1.6 1.8 3.5
67.4 64.9 26.9
2200 2300 4720
6.47
1.56
6.61
0.55
12/24/2012
6.60 Quarterly
6.62 Quarterly
NA Quarterly
4.83 Quarterly
1.46 Quarterly
51.3 Quarterly
1250 Quarterly
8/812012 1--_7_8_-\ 9/19/2012 t-_6_7_-I 10/24/20121--_2_.6_2---1 11115/2012
56.8
4020
52.9 12/24/2012 1-_6_5_.9_-+-_Q..;;;u_art_er....::ly--f
6.60 7.40 6.63 6.60 6.78 Quarterly
17 9.8 15.0 34.6 5.5 Quarterly
n M M2 18.5 17.2 Quarterly
-
11/13/2012 114 12/26/20121--_12_2_-+-_Q..;;u_ar_t_er....::lY--f
7.03 5.80 Quarterly
81712012 1-_1_39_-1 9119/2012 1--_1_3_0_-110123/2012 135
8.04 7.67 7.86
38.4 41.9 45.2 36 31.6 Quarterly
21 21 18 23.6 22.2
1400 1460 1320 8/6/2012 1---1-75--t 911812012 1--1-7-2--\ 10/22/20121---1-57--1 1116/2012
1230
189
NA NA
571 561
273 283
0.61 0.54
NA NA
8/812012 9/19/2012 10/23/2012 ~2 ~4
18.8 8.2
26.2 22.9
NA NA
NS NA NS NA NS
NA NA
NS NA NS NA NS
NA NA
NS NA NS NA NS
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NS NA NS NA NS
NA NA
NA NA
NS NA NS NA NS
NA NA NS NS NS NA NA
NA NA NS NS NS NA NA
NA NA
NA NA NS NS NS NA NA
NA NA
NA
545
253
0.517
NA
4.31
19.0
22.4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1111312012
11/27/2012
11/27/2012
11/28/2012
11129/2012
76.9
557
241
0.554
30.4
4.23
15.4
21.8
315
21.8
846
1.46
58.9
6.55
1.26
6.35
2780
1.31
5610
III
NA 11/27/2012 0.402
NA 6.54 1-----1 11/27/2012
NA 23
NA 117 1-----\ 11114/2012 1-----\ NA <30
NA 3.2
NA 1210 1-----1 1112612012 NA 6.51
NA 3160
1270
12/18/2012 170
NA
664
240
0.5
NA
12/18/2012 6.5
12.1
21 .. ,
NA
NS NA
NA
NS NA
NA
NS NA
NA
NA
NA
NS NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NS NA
NA
NA
NA
NA NS NA
NA
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Semi-Annually
Semi-Annually
Semi-Annually
Semi-Annually
Semi-Annualh
Semi-Annual!>
Semi-Annually
Semi-Annually
Semi-Annually
Semi-Annually
Semi-Annuall\
Semi-Annuall,
Semi-Annually
Semi-Annually
Semi-Annualh
Semi-Annuall)
Semi-Annualh
Semi-Annualh
Semi-Annualh
Semi-Annually
Semi-Annually
ifMo ConStituent
Exceedhig GWQL
i~f . ;~
.~:.
Field pH (S.U.)
GWGEin,
Current
'~;l~!lWDP
6.78-8.5
MW-19 (Class ill) Gross Alpha minus
Rn & U (pCi/L) 2.36 .'
Nitrate + Nitrite (as ;.83 '
N) (mg/L)
MW-23 (Class ill) I--_F_ie_ld_p_H_(_S_.U_._) -+,....;.;}"..6:1_.5_-_8_"".§"-. ~
Manganese (ug/L) C"" 550
MW-24 (Class ill) t-_Fl_u_or_id_e_(;",.M",.;g;..IL..,;,)_r-........ _0"".3 .... 6..,;,---t
Thallium (ugIL) 1
Field pH (S.U.) " 6.5 -8,5
Nitrate + Nitrite (as .!'
N) (mg/L) 5.6
Chloride (mg/L) ~ 38.,
MW -27 (Class ill) t-_S_u_lf_a_te...;(m.....;;;,gIL.....;..) _+-__ 4.,;.6.,;."4 ......... 0......1"
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5-8.5 "'~
IDS (mg/L) 1075
Gross Alpha minus I_ a 2
Rn & U (pCi/L)
Chloride (mg/L) '" 105
Manganese (ugIL) 1837 MW-28 (Class ill) I--",:;:"..----:...=:......:.....r... ....... ....;..:...;"",...--j
Field pH (S.U.) 6.1 -8.5
.'Ei'''''%.
Iron (ugIL) ,~, 1869
Manganese (ug/L) r' 5624.Ji!
MW -29 (Class ill) I--_ID_S..,;,(m--:::.g/L-:..,.) _-f-.. .......... 44._0_0,..,.,....--I
Field pH (S.U.) '0.46 -8.5
3.33 Gross Alpha minus "
Rn & U (pCi/L)
MW-32 (Class ill) t----~--+-""'"""-....... ---__l
Field pH (S.U.) 6.4 -8.5
Notes:
GWCL values are taken from February 15, 2011 version of GWDP.
NS = Not Required and Not Sampled
NR = Required and Not Reported
NA = Not Applicable
Exceedances are shown in yellow
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Values in 0 parentheses are the field pH measurements for the resampled analyses.
NA 6.83 NA NA 6.86
NA 2/28/2012 NA NS NA NS NA 5/16/2012 0.9
NA 3.9 NA NA 3.7
NA 2/20/2012 6.61 NA NS NS NA 6.74 I-----i 5116120121-----i
NA 51 NA NA 49
NA 2.25 NA NA 2.01
NA NA NA NA 0.14
NA 2123/2012 0.96 NS NA NS NA 5/1012012 0.74
NA 6.03 NA NA 6.21
NA 6.4 NA NA ~2
NA 45 NA NA 46
2/2812012 451
7.24 NS NA 446 I-----i 51112012 I-----i NA 7.03
NA
NA
NA NS NA
NA 1140 NA NA 1170
NA 2.3 NA NA
NA 109 NA NA 114
2/2812012 NA NS NA 1850 I-----i 5/8/2012 I-----i NA NA NS
NA 6.22 NA NA 6.15
NA 1310 NA NA 1400
NA NA NA NA 6140
NA 2/22/2012 NA NS NA NS NA 5/812012 4600 t-----I t-----I
NA 7.12 NA NA 6.47
NA NA NA 2.4
2/2112012 NS NS I-----i 4/30/20121-----i
NA 6.57 NA NA 6.40
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NA 7.21
NA 7/19/2012 NA
NA 4
NA 7.10 1-----I7/17120121------f
NA 117
NA 4.7
NA NA
NA 7/18/2012 1.36
NA 6.45
NA 6.7
NA 47
NA 453 1-----I7/16/20121------f NA 7.40
NA 1150
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7/16/2012
811/2012
7/16/2012
8/112012
7116/2012
8/112012
8/112012
1.2
105
1660
6.38
(5.81)
1270
5190
4420
7/16/2012 6.68
8/112012 (6.45)
1.4
I------f 7/9/2012 I------f
NA 6,72
NA NA
NS NA NS NA NS
NA NA
NA NS NA NS NS
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NS NA NS NA NS
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NS
NA
NS NS NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA NS NS NS
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NS NA NS NA NS
NA NA
NA NA
NS NS NS
NA NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6.71
12/13/2012 4.86
3.96
6.61 12/5/2012 1-----1
54.3
1.35
0.558
11129/2012 0.666 t------1
NA
NA
NA 6.01
NA 6.9
NA 44.2
NA 451 I-----i 11113/20121-----1 NA 6.69
NA 1070
NA 1.33
NA 115
NA 1680 1-----1 11114/2012
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.98
1350
5040
1111412012 4430 t-----I ------
NA 6.48
NA 2.97
1lI6/20 12 1-----1
NA 6.23
NA Semi-Annualh
NS NA Semi-Annualh
NA Semi-Annually
NS NA Semi-Annually
NA Semi-Annually
NA Semi-Annually
NS NA Semi-Annually
NA Semi-Annually
NA Semi-Annuall)
NA Semi-Annuall\
NA Semi-Annuall\ NS NA Semi-Annuall\
NA Semi-Annualh
NA Semi-Annually
NA Semi-Annually
NA NS Semi-Annually
NA Semi-Annuall}
NA Semi-Annual!)
NA Semi-Annualh
NS NA Semi-Annuall,
NA Semi-Annualh
NA Semi-Annually
NS
NA Semi-Annually
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Field Data Worksheets Quarterly Sampling
Tab C Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
Tab C1 Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring, October 2012
Tab C2 Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring, December 2012
Tab D Quarterly Depth to Water
Tab E Laboratory Analytical Reports-Quarterly Sampling
Tab F Laboratory Analytical Reports-Accelerated Monitoring
Tab F1 Laboratory Analytical Reports-Accelerated Monitoring, October 2012
Tab F2 Laboratory Analytical Reports-Accelerated Monitoring, December 2012
Tab G Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
G-1AIB
G-2AIB
G-3AIB
G-4AIB
G-SAIB
G-6AIB
G-7AIB
G-8 AlB
G-9AIB
Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
Holding Time Evaluation
Laboratory Temperature Check
Anal ytical Method Check
Reporting Limit Evaluation
Trip Blank Evaluation
QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Radiologics Counting Error
Laboratory Matrix QC
Tab H Kriged Current Quarterly Groundwater Contour Map
Tab I Groundwater Time Concentration Plots
Tab J CSV Transmittal Letter
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
MW-5
• perched monitoring well
TW4-12 o temporary perched monitoring well
TWN-10
~ temporary perched nitrate monitoring well
PIEZ-1
Q
TW4-27
~
perched piezometer
temporary perched monitoring well
installed October, 2011
RUIN SPRING 6 seep or spring
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
WHITE MESA SITE PLAN
SHOWING LOCATIONS OF PERCHED
WELLS AND PIEZOMETERS
DATE REFERENCE
H:/718000/may121Uwelloc12.srf
FIGURE
A-1
TabB
Field Data Worksheets Quarterly Sampling
Mill -Gro.undwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
GroundwatE:!r Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
;--·---·---·-------:-.. -· .. -·-·· .. -.. -·· .. 1
i OE NISON~~,~ I' ! MINES I
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
1 y-rh Q\A.o..r-fer &f'OU-f\J\\No...:fe.r .2.0 l~
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ...... 1 ~_W_-_O_[ _________ ____'
Sampler Name
and initials: F;r~(\n~(' lloli,J~1'f.H
Field Sample ID 1 MW-OI_11271..ot20
Date and Time for Purging 1 1)/:z.7/.20 1?.. and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: Cf[]2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 S~'(V\lo-.r'H1WA\ G-W -1 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ...... 1 M_VV_-_2_2 ______ ....J
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0 pH Buffer 4.0 19.0
Specific Conductance 1,,---~_94 ____ ....I1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): lL-.l_18_.0_D ___ .....J
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 f;Y.?;7 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:II---r0::::r--:::--=:-_-II(.653h)
3" Well:. Pt.~<6 J.367h)
Conductance (avg) 1 ~3' "-------------------~ pH of Water (avg) ..... 1 _b_.Gt_O ______ .....I
Well Water Temp. (avg) \'3. qs Redox Potential (Eh)l l1 fo~ Turbidity ,--I ....!,q .;;.... b~_....J
Weather cond·1 ...... _~_'_e_o.._r __________ ____' Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ...... 1 o_o __ --J
Time 1 0 q 11-S Gal. Purged 3~.D~
Conductance 183G
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1...\5 ]
Turbidity (NTU) Pi Itt
Time I Og'ij
Conductance 183 J
Gal. Purged I ~q. tF1
pH '6.93
Temp.oC !5,qs
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 4'9 '---~ __ -J
Turbidity (NTU) 9,g
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time 1 O'fYb I Gal. Purged 13<=1.27 I
Conductance I lg~7 I pH I b.~lJ 1
Temp.oC I 13Aq I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I q,o I
Turbidity (NTU) 12f .b I
Time I 09~g: I Gal. Purged 1 3~.11 I
Conductance 11E3b I pH I ~·9g I
Temp.oC I t 3.Z=J:b I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I l1t:3 I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~.'1 I
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged IL---Ly...;;;.o....;... J~i'--__ ...... gallon{s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I · 2..17
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I JZ1.YD I
c
10
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I Aw A L GEL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs ID D 3x40 ml D II HCL ~ D
Nutrients rtl D 100 ml D LI H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals rE1 D 250ml l:I D HN03 r0 ~ D
All Other Non Radiologics 1B D 250ml D t:J No Preserv. D ~
Gross Alpha ~ D 1,000 ml ~ D HN03 'eJ D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ D ~
G-e.t\erO\ \ :r.nor~o..f\l~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ,--11_0_5_,_'1_' __ --' Sample Time I O~.sO
Comment
~ See instruction
Arr;\lea 0"(\ ~A-e (1..+ Ob1f() Io.nner ~Yla 6-0..(6" ? .... ~se"t--tor"' f",r8e.. ~Vl~ .sCAMf);~ ~veY}t.
f'u.r~-e, bt!~" c...t OG,ys. PlA.("~ea w<=11 -Par (lI\.. +o+a..) o.f' 18'..5 ~~ WI"f)II\+C-S. w~+cr WGi-S
().. \:tt\c.. m\Ar\(~. ?\AC-~e... et1t\e! Mc\ .So\.Mf'e..s colJe.c..1-cJ if oq56 Le-t}-~\+c ~t }063
MW-01 11-27-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 , ........ -.... ··-.. -----·--------------------------.. -··-...... ---.. 1
!OENISO~J.4 1 : MINI:S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
D;;~riptio~-~f Sampling Event: I L)"" Q v.(Ai+~r (,-rov..n JWo..+e, :2s:> 12
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Location (well name): ....... 1 _.H_w_-_O_2.. _________ ----I
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 "';nner Ho 11 ;J"'jl11l
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 11/.2.7f20 12 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: l-m Ipump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event 1 SCrYl1t1-./11)\h(}.1 6-vJ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..... I_M_W_-_D_l _____ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance ....... 1 _ct...;;.~...;..q-=--__ ----II ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 lOCi .. gS
Conductance (avg) 3775 '--=--------~
pH Buffer 4.0 '1.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 128,80
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:I I-;;l..'37 I (.653h)
3 " Well:........ ---.,;."0 __ ---1. (.367h)
b.5'1
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \3.'47 Redox Potential (Eh)1 513 Turbidity ....... 1 0 ___ --1
Weather cond·1 ....... __ C_l_e_o.._r _________ ----I
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event}I ....... O-'--o __ --I
Time 1 08S0 Gal. Purged 1 2..'1 ,QS Time 10 &51 Gal. Purged 1 .2..5. } 7
Conductance I· 3,7' pH 1 '.105 Conductance 1 377.b
Temp.oC Temp.oC 1 13,47
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Sl~ Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 5)3
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) 0
Time 1 09 S2 Gal. Purged 1:l5 ,3 g Time IOg53 Gal. Purged 12.5.60
Conductance 1 "'51 fS~ pH co . 7l> Conductance 3775
Temp.oC I 13.9:2-Temp.oC 1'5,50
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 5J9 '-------I Redox Potential Eh (mV) lL-s=..;....Jy~_---I
Turbidity (NTU) o Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = ..... 1 _-1._1_7 ___ --' T = 2V/Q = 1 11~.O\j I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 10
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I AWAl.. 6-EL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml 0 gJ HCL ~
Nutrients rn 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 [2f
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics 111 0 250ml 0 ~ No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha [] 0 1,000 ml ~ 0 HN03 I)-
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 ijl 0
0-<.t'ler()J :L1)OrSOlfPL5 If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I \ 1 '1 . gS Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
Arr:\)e£\ on ~rh~ <At Ob~O ~Vln~r dt-nd.. 6-~rril) pr~~t:n-t -for p\Are,c ~1'1~ cS~Mfl;~ -eJCryT.
fv..(~~ ~~~t1 ~+ Ob5S. rV\("~e.a weJ} ~r tI\. +o+<hl of 120 ~it)lA~S. w~te.r WCIS eJear
l' \A.r~G enae~ tArtJ... .s~Mpl~ coJ/ecte-J. ~t 08'55. Let} jt·1-c.. ~+ oq J5.
MW-02 11-27-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
~
0
rn
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
1---------------------------------1 ATTACHMENT 1-2
:1 OE N
M
I.S
N
O
p
Nsl).4 ~.I I WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
! E:,:J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
~ See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: 1 '1Th G. V\ovter G-ro\A.t1J\N<Atcr 2.01'2.,.
Location (well name): I"--'-A--'--W_ .... --'03=-________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: I -r;.YlYlcr Ho\\,'J~j/-JH
Field Sample ill
Date and Time for Purging 1 11/2g/'2..ol'1.. and Sampling (if different) I /V"/A-
Well Purging Equip Used: @Jpump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 Sem;o.flY1\A",\ &v.:l Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I L-_M_W_-_O_3_A _____ --I
pH Buffer 7.0 7,0
Specific Conductance L-I ---..:.Q...;..,1 ~~ __ ---II ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 g 3, 1,(,
Conductance (avg) 1-1 _5_~_~_~-,--_____ ---,
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): ..... 1 01_7,_0_6 __ ____'
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:~-o-~---II (.653h)
3" Well: . .5.01 .(.367h)
pH of Water (avg) ..... 1 _G....;.,....IL\_2..~ ____ ____'
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 lY.(;S Redox Potential (Eh)IL-Y_b_1 _---I Turbidity ..... 1 _0 __ ____'
Weather cond'l L...-_?_(J\._~_~~_(_\_o~_o\_y ____ ___..I
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event} ..... 1 "_'O __ -....J
Time 13 ':L,O
Conductance
Temp.oC
1 S~23
I Iq. b J
Gal. Purged 1 '--)_l._Y_~_----,
pH 16.2.1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ..... g~b_\ __ .....I
Turbidity (NTU) 0
Time 1 132~ Gal. Purged I ll-iSS
Conductance I :5 ~:£:b pH I b,yt
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V)
Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time I l32.l
Conductance
Temp.oC
1 5~2'i
I }q. ""
Gal. Purged 11). "9
pH 1 b.Q7
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I _4..;...b_J __ --I
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I )3.2:S Gal. Purged 12.,,0f,
Conductance I 5829 pH I {)S5
Temp.oC I \Y .bC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I q_,_, __ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) 10
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1 . 20~ T=2V/Q= 1 yg.~3 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 10
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1 AvJJ.tL &~L
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs m 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL E 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 TEl H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals Kl 0 250ml t9 0 HN03 ~ 0
All Other Non Radiologics IPl 0 250ml 0 'ID No Preserv. 0 ~
Gross Alpha 1El 0 1,000 ml ffi 0 HN03 ~ 0
Other (specify) fg 0 Sample volume 0 19 0 ~
&-e.nC.fo..\ :r:nDr~O\.I"\;c.S If preservati ve is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth L-I 1S_1_,_&l_1 __ ---I Sample Time 1 13 '.2.S
See instruction
Comment
MW-03 11-28-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 j·------------··--n
II. ()ENISONI)~=.l~ I MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER ----,
Description of Sampling Event: I 0/1; Q ~o.tter Gf{)\...lr13\ ~(.(fer 2012.
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Location (well name): .... 1 _M_W_-_O_"$_A ________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~t1Yl~(' Hi> l1la~ /11j-
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging [ \ l/2..f( /?D\~ and Sampling (if different) n/2tt/201''Z...
Well Purging Equip Used: I~ Ipump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) .... IQ_C_D ______ ....a
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I s,-G/VI io-n11W>-\ G-\I\J Pre v . Well Sampled in Sampling Event ·'---J1_W_ ..... _~_~ ______ ......
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 _q_q_4 ___ ---'I ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 ~5. 2D
Conductance (avg) b D1....Co L--~~~ _____ ~
pH Buffer 4.0 I 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): ..... 19_5_._00 ___ ......
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 G.3<j IC.653h)
3" Well:t-. "';"O----I.(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) ! 1.5 .51..\ Redox Potential (Eh) .... 1 ...... 4 ..... 1_1_---' Turbidity .... ! _0 __ --'
Weather Condo 1L.--_S_\A._Y\_Vl_t __________ ....a
Extll Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)! ..... b_() __ --'
Time ! 11.IS Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance 1 ~O?.. G::, pH Conductance
Temp.oC 1\5.59 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ..... Y.....I....L4_1 __ --I Redox Potential Eh (mV) IL.--___ --'
Turhidity (NTU) I 0 Turbidity (NTU)
Time I 07Si) Gal. Purged o Time Gal. Purged o
Conductance GDI pH I G.3b Conductance bD2S pH I b35
Temp.oC I tt.:ti Temp.oC 113 .04
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 53Y Redox Potential Eh (mV) .... 1 _5_)Cj~_--,
Turbidity (NTU) 0 Turbidity (NTU) I 6
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
5e~D(e.
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1 .2.08'
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 (;1.53 1
1 )·15
1 1~.98
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1 AW It L G-E L
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs [1 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL ~
Nutrients OJ 0 100 ml 0 [) H2SO4 m
Heavy Metals Il 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 ®
All Other Non Radiologics t1I 0 250ml 0 !2g No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha ~ 0 1,000 ml t1I 0 HN03 1&1
Other (specify) r:9 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
G-dlGro..\ ::r:t\()(~~t1; (.~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1-1 "'_Y_, 0_0 ___ --' Sample Time olSo
Comment
~ See instruction
Ar( i \Jea.. on S l+~ 4\. t 11) I. ---1.:YlYJer Bb 11 :l"j pf eSar1-~.-f'1A .. ~e . l' V.r ~e be,,".., "I t
111S. r\\(~~a wd) -For fA. +c;-t ... ) of' LD M ·t1\k-te~ R(te.'\ well J.fJ
'P\.A6~f et)~J. I-.t \2 rs. ~~er wa..S Gleo..(· 1
Arr:v~ 0(\ ~;+e iA..t 01Y2 . ~r'lt1cr o."J G-~rr:.., pr~~~".t -to GoJle,G+ .$tiMp]e:5. p~ptA -10 Wcq+cr wetS
&g·'3,5 5tA.Mp\Q we.r-c. LO)'ec..+e.~ 6.+ 0/50, Lcrl-s.;+~ 0..+ 0 gO'2,.
MW-03A 11-28-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
J8I
0
I5?J
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 j)ENISONI)~~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINI:S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I yn Q~,..+o G-fO\).tl~ w(J~r -;:2.0)2.
Location (well name): ..... 1 _J\\...;...W_-_O_5~ ________ ---I
Field Sample ID
Sampler Name
and initials:
~ See instruction
Date and Time for Purging I '\1'27720 \'2... and Sampling (if different) .I\I/A "---_________ ---1
Well Purging Equip Used: [Q]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L...I _Q_E_P _____ ----I
Purging Method Used: [ID2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I :Seml~nMv.(A.\ G9 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ..... __ M_W_-_)_~ _____ .......
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance 1L--1_Q_, ___ ----II ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I \ 0 b . bO
Conductance (avg) .2A7l "----~------~
pH Buffer 4.0 I q .O
Well Depth(O.Olft): I )38.50
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 ~.&3 1<·653h)
3" Well: 1.-. __ O __ ........ (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I )~. ~D Redox Potential (Eh)I,--~ __ I_g __ ....... Turbidity 1'--0 ___ .......
Weather cond'l ..... ___ :)_V\_Yl_~ ________ ....... Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ..... 1 ,_0 __ ----1
Time 11590 Gal. Purged
Conductance I ~ q,'2. pH 7 .11
Temp.oC 1 19.GO
/'
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 Y (1 ~
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0
Time 1/592 Gal. Purged 1 91. bb
Conductance pH 1 J."Z5
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ___ 9_1:6 __ ----1
Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time )Sq)
Conductance I 2..'171
Temp.oC I IY. Z;}
Gal. Purged I q I. 4Y
pH I {.23
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1.-
1
q_2~J __ .......
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 11593
Conductance I ~" 71
Temp. °c 1 19 ·57
o
Gal. Purged 1 9 I . 88
pH 17.32:
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1.-1 Y_l1 __ ----I
Turbidity (NTU) o
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged I y ~ . ~ \ gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . !2.17
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q=1 1~l.q6 I
I ()
10
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I AWfj L G-P L-
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs aI 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL ~
Nutrients [1J 0 100 ml 0 .ZI H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250 ml 00 0 HN03 CiI
All Other Non Radiologics cp 0 250 ml 0 [21 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 01 0 1,000 ml ~ 0 HN03 ~
Other (specify) Ell 0 Sample volume 0 r5lJ 0
0--Q'IG((}...1 -:rno(,~Iilf\;GS
Final Depth I 11-7:;· OD Sample Time
Comment
A((\\)e.~ 01') Sl":r~ 4 12..2.0 -),..nnc( (;IJ?4
-evc.Y11-: t\"r~e. b~d,fJ tII+ 1?-30-'Pu.r~fl
lNo..+er 1.V<>..s, Gl",.r, ?lAr~~ -eI'lJ,,~ "'''lJ.
Lefi-$1:tC "'-}
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
~ See instruction
&,..r("if] present -f;r pur(\e Oln). SW'1P"{:j
woe II ~,-~+o+GtI o-t' )Gf5 YVI/()IA+e.s.
S~M ple~ co l1~c.+<:d ~+ 15 Y0_
155£'
MW-05 11-27-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
~
0
18
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
IOENISONl)jj
r-.-.------.---~--·------
L. MINI:~ _
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
'q1"h ex ""0-. .. +6 G,.. 0 ""n tl W Q\ :} er :;4.0 I ~
~ See instruction
Location (well name): L-I _M~W_""_\_1 _________ ----,
Sampler Name
and initials: I-r;.nne.(' HDJJIJ\~)T'lf
Field Sample ill 1 MW-1L.lll ~Ol'2
Date and Time for Purging 1 1171~7")..Ol'J... and Sampling (if different) ,/V/A L--~ ________________ ~
Well Purging Equip Used: IT[] pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) Q c:: D L--______________ ~
Purging Method Used: [][]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event 1 $.e.1VI1o..Y'\V\\A.l1',J ~\I\) Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I L-_ir_.I:_\ft_.!_~._.::~_\:~_, _. __________ ~
pH Buffer 7.0 11.....-7_._0 ___ ----' pH Buffer 4.0 t1.0
Specific Conductance lL--q_'1_~~ ______ ....I1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 l oo.(')D
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 g g I 7 () 4" well:l 2.b.q~ 1(·653h)
3" Well: 'C (.367h) L--___ --I
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) 7. t...Ji ~--------------~
Well Water Temp. (avg) ]9.'57 Redox Potential (Eh)1 :t.96 Turbidity ,-I _0 ______ .....
Weather Condo I (
.::> '" r'lf'} ,j
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)L-I---.,;;.g_b_----'
L--______ ~ __________________ ~
Time I l~2S
Conductance 12.. 9XQ
Gal. Purged 1 Set \ b J
pH i·'11
Temp.oC 11 9/56
Redox Potential Eh (mV) IL-:;l.. __ q_j ____ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) I {')
Time Ia....::l~'b::.::;.~..;.;:-:J:....--_....J Gal. Purged 60.\6
Conductance pH /·4;
Temp.oC .
Redox Potential Eh (m V) :2:99 L--______ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) 0
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time I }~~b I Gal. Purged I .s~ .g~ I
Conductance I ~'l:23 I pHI 7,Y7 I
Temp.oC I 19 t:51 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2AS I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time 1 13~1$ I Gal. Purged I t;c>.:32 I
Conductance I ;.4.~'30 I pH 17 ,Y7 I
Temp.oC I J9.Q \ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I :Z:LJ b I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 I
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged f,O.76 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I • ~ 17
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I .2..Y~ • .5b I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 10
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I e)
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I AWAL (7 E~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs riI D 3x40 ml D ~ HCL tE D
Nutrients m D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 [1j D
Heavy Metals ri1 D 250ml ~ D HN03 ~ D
All Other Non Radiologics ~ D 250ml D -0 No Preserv. D ~
Gross Alpha ~ D 1,000 ml ~ D HN03 rn D
Other (specify) rn D Sample volume D [] D r:!
G--~(\-e.f"'" :1.nor~~f\~~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 8g. Gf 5 Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-11 11-12-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONI)J~
MIN~S
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 t.ph Q"'(A.("+e,.. (j-rO\An~W""+C'(' 2012.
~ See instruction
Location (well name): .... 1_M_W_ ... _1:..;;.2....:..-________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 ~nn~r No)}. ~~j /TJi
Field Sample ID MW-12_ H27:2.D12.
Date and Time for Purging 1 11/27/2.0 )'2. and Sampling (if different) 1 ,/I//A
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I S "Y'lj li\7l/')uliI \ 6-w Pre v . Well Sampled in Sampling Event IL....-M_W_-_O_2.. ______ --J
pH Buffer 7.0 I,D pH Buffer 4.0 '-1.0
Specific Conductance L-I _1_q __ ~ ___ --I1 !!MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 130.\.)D
Depth to Water Before Purging I )08.£:0 4" well:1 19.-:2.3 1(·653h)
3" Well: l> (.367h) L--___ --'
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) 425 \ L..--___________ ~ pH of Water (avg) 1 ..... _'_, -"-Y~-'--____ ----I
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lY. ~4 Redox Potential (Eh)1 SO'f 1 Turbidity ..... 1 _bf_.'f __ .....
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event}L...1 ~_o __ ....J
Time ..... 11_13_5 __ ---' Gal. Purged 2&. ~1 Time 1 1J3' Gal. Purged 1 28.Y~
Conductance I Y 2..S 3 pH 1 6:2l1 Conductance I Y 2.. yq
Temp.oC )~ .. 41 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1a...-5r:...;)~I __ ---1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) Ir.......:..o.s~Il>O:"'-_----I
Turbidity (NTU) I 10, , Turbidity (NTU)
Time I ) 137 Gal. Purged I 2::&. ~q Time I -) 13 is Gal. Purged I ;<E.g(
Conductance l1252.. pH " ·!.f8 L..------'-:.-_----' Conductance q2S~ pH I b .. E1.J
Temp.oC 15.0() Temp.oC 15,00
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ..... 5=-O_~+-_----I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I'---<.S_D..:..r.Z __ .....
Turbidity (NTU) I '1. 3 Turbidity (NTU) I Gt, 7
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I • 2)7
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I 131.;2.{) I
1°
1 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I AWA L GEL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs 00 D 3x40 ml D ~ HCL ~
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals ~ D 250ml r:J D HN03 tJ
All Other Non Radiologics ~ D 250ml D ~ No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha ~ D , 1,000 ml ~ D HN03 ~
Other (specify) tf1 D Sample volume D ~ D
&~ru:"",' ~OGAI) J'cS If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 12.3 \ 75 Sample Time 1.-1 _1 l_Lj_O ___ --'
Comment
~~ See instruction
Ar,. I ve'A on ~ it-e ... + 0 q 20. ""';nMr '" "J t;. .. rr:'1 presen +--to r p \A r,3 E: "117..1 ~<i M f 1iV -e. v rn i.
Y\A(,~-<-b~l>.fl 0\.+ 092-5. Pu.r€:\ceX ~~.\\ -+0<" 0\. +61-~\ o+' 135 m;nlA.tes.
\}Jo-.~cr h~~ (}... .sl:~",t--bro\NV'\ J.;~(o\o('. Pu.r~'C. enacA o..l1a .sa.l"'lplc...s c.o\le.c1-cJ. &\1-
l) YO . Left-Si1-<=. ,J-) )55
MW-1211-27-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
~
D
~
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
[" ....... -.......-... -.. ----~ .. --.-.
I OENISOJ)~~
i MINES -_._'-......,....---
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Lrrh Q v.o. r:t"e,.... G-... 0 \A r'\ a wo...4€, 2.01'2.
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 _M_W_-_'_y _________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 :::r"Y1I1~"'" lio JI:ltd /-rH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 ) 1/2...,12,.0\'-and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [Q]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I QED
Purging Method Used: IlJ 12 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event r S,e<>1;M>1V.O,.l trw Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event II...-M_W_-_2_0 _____ ----I
pH Buffer 7.0 1 ..... _,_,_0 ___ ---'
Specific Conductance 1-1 ~_¥l ____ ----II [!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 10'3. g b
Conductance (avg) 3~50 L--~ ____________ ~
pH Buffer 4.0 1 Y.O
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 i b. 2.2. I <.653h)
3" Well:l-. _O __ ----I.(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 )4.'1(J Redox Potential (Eh)1 qto Turbidity ..... 1 _0 __ ---'
Weather Condo I S \.Al"\ni Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) 1-1 b_o __ ----I
1...-_____________ ----1
Time Gal. Purged 31.4b
Conductance pH 1 C .. SD
Temp.oC 11Q.Q7
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 l1b?-
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0
Time 1 1! '~ 7 . Gal. Purged 31 . 3Zi
1332.. ,.....,..,..~~----,
Conductance 1 59ifK pH 1 &;.52: .
Temp.oC 1 IY ·9 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 960
Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time 1 ',1 ~3·f:, ,
1331
Gal. Purged 1 31 . b8
Conductance 1 3 &f 52. pH 1 b .52.
Temp.oC I lq.9'
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 _'1_'_1 __ ......
Turbidity (NTU) 0
Time 1 J 13 g J' Gal. Purged 1::3;;' .. J I
]333
Conductance "3950 pH 1 <0.5'2:
Temp.oC 1 14.Y)
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 tf_b_D __ ......
Turbidity (NTU) o
1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon{s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I -2..11
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I 144. 49 I
I 0
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I A wA L CrB. L-
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below)
VOCs (gj D 3x40 ml
Nutrients C!I D 100 ml
Heavy Metals IE D 250 ml
All Other Non Radiologics [E D 250 ml
Gross Alpha tB D 1,000 ml
Other (specify) rn D Sample volume
G-01~('r;.1 ::I"n DffjAfl;<-.5
Final Depth I 10 L\ ,'\1 Sample Time 1335
Comment
y N
D [E
D ~
~ D
D t3I m D
D ~
Y
HCL !sa
H2SO4 ~
HN03 ~
No Preserv. D
HN03 ~
D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
I::J See instruction ~1!l
Af'r;\leA. Ofl ~(h:. iAt 11ob. --rAV1fl~r d.Y)J. Cr".u I'') pr.e.sef]t--tar f""i(je "n~ SAMpJt0 eVent ..
Pu.r~e. b~Ov') 4\1 1/0.5. P\Ar~c~ v.)e\1 ~(' fA. -1-ot&\\ of"' '5D VVh·YllA-t~. ~C\te(' L0a.S
Cl-c",r. p ","r~<. e:t'I~ej. /l\t'lJ. Sll.fI'1P 10 GO lie d-.. ).. • .,1-)335. L-e-R-:;,--I-..... t-13Y 5
MW-1411-27-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
121
D
'ij1
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 r----·---··--············-··-···-··· ..... -.-.... -.. _.-... -.... ,
I j)ENISONI)~~1 L_ MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1'1 \ 1"\ Q\Ao..rfer GrO\A.nd\\fJ","+-t!.(" ~Ol":l..
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Location (well name): I P\w-}7_11';l.~~Ol'J..
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 -r(M'\~~(" HotllJtA~I'11t
Field Sample ID I fA W-17_11 :2..<3:l.01~
Date and Time for Purging I 1 \ 7'28/?-o 12.. and Sampling (if different) ;J/A
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: I}[] 2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 S eN1;a-.nrh)'o..\ &\J Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I L-_M_W_-_D_S _____ --I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 g.O
Specific Conductance ..... 1 _1l.;...9.;...C1"';"'-__ ...J1 f!MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 11".00
Depth to Water Before Purging 11'-1. 'Y) Casing Volume (V) 4" well:12Q .. f,l 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L--___ --I
Conductance (avg) '1 ) 7D L----.:... _______ ~ pH of Water (avg) b.5 7
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 19.27 Redox Potential (Eh)1 492: Turbidity ..... 1 _0 __ ---1
Weather Condo
Time &.....;1 \_O_y_D_---' Gal. Purged SO. qll
Conductance pH
Temp.oC I lLt. ~1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1L--'1 ...... q_~ __ .....
Turbidity (NTU) I D
Time ,-,-I J _DY_2.-'--_---' Gal. Purged S \ . L12
Conductance 91 b'1
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event} ..... I-_3_o __ ...J
Time IL-' O_Y_J~_--I Gal. Purged 151. ':l..'
Conductance pH I b.57
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ,-,-I ...;.4_qZ __ ---I
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I )oQ3
Conductance I q I 13
o
Gal. Purged I Slob '-\
pH I b·bL/
Temp.oC I )Q.25
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ....J4:....!q...;;:'Z=---_....J
Turbidity (NTU) I 0
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged S;[.oS gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I • 2)7
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q=1 22G.~4 I
10
10
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I A \\J A L G-E L
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml 0 19 HCL 19 0
Nutrients ltJ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals lB 0 250 ml 19 0 HN03 EI 0
All Other Non Radiologics 1fI 0 250ml 0 ~ No Preserv. 0 ~
Gross Alpha IN 0 1,000 ml ~ 0 HN03 ~ 0
Other (specify) KI 0 Sample volume 0 iil 0 ®
&<.flerlA) -:Ct)O'f~o.Y"\; (.~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I g 7. ) J Sample Time L-11_O_4.5.;....;;;;... __ ----I
Comment
~ See instruction
Arf~ve~ on ~;+e 0.1-Ob'10. -\()\Ylner dlr'lJ. c;.Q\.r~in p-res-en4-+or PU(~-e ~t\c\ s.o..mfL·~ event ..
P v.("(,\-e be,~O!.f\ "'+ 06t;-S. P'-"(5ec\ ~ el \ -\;r (J.. +oi--~) oS;-~ YVl,'1\\.A.+-e.s_
~ ..'2.l..JO
\j0C1\.ter Wd-S c..leo..r. P\Ar~-e eJ"\Je~ ~,.,~ .s~rvlp)e-s (olJec.+t'J (A.-r JoYS. LA-SIre
0...+ 1J0,5
MW-1711-28-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r-----------------------------·-I I OE":J.F~lP~~1
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
4Th Q v4.Gu.f~r G-rc)V\f\(1wod:er zo)2..
~ See instruction
Location (well name): IL...,;M~W_~......:)~g:....-_________ --,
Sampler Name
and initials: l-ranncr Ho ll,·J4.j /TJi
Field Sample ID IMW-lg -ll:2.~2.o 12..
Date and Time for Purging 1 111~/2..Ot2. and Sampling (if different) 1.-1 _/\../._/_11 _______ ---'
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1-1 Q_c_D ___ ..,--___ --'
Purging Metho~ Used: ~2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event l.seMlO.t1t1lA.oJ G-w Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I.-_M_W_-_2_b _____ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0 11.....-7..;...._0 ___ ---' pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance 1.-1 4_q_41-.. ___ --IJ ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 )3Q,Ot)
Depth to Water Before Purging I 70./ S Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ~). Get 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) 1.....-___ ......1
Conductance (avg) L--~3=..;;;;;S_1 ...... 71--. ____ --I pH of Water (avg) 6. 4q L--___ ~ _______ ___'
Well Water Temp. (avg) I P=i. 17 Redox Potential (Eh)I S"33 Turbidity I y .0
Weather cond'l I-___ C._)W _________ --I
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event}I.-I-_2_D __ --'
Time I 13L)S Gal. Purged 1 S3.59 Time 13'1b Gal. Purged I is:3. 7b
Conductance '"S5)9 pH 1 C;.Q7 Conductance I 3511.:>
Temp.oC H9·)C; Temp.oC jl Y.IJ
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 .=53-=-Y __ ......I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1L-5_:S.....;4 __ .....I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 3> .tt Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 )3'1-:1 Gal. Purged I i)3.47 Time I 13 tH( Gal. Purged gLt .}q
Conductance I 351'> pH 1-1 G_,9_tf __ .....1 Conductance 1 35 zo pH L-I b_I5_/ _ ___'
Temp.oC 1 )9 .J 1 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) $33 Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I 5_:5_Y __ .....I
Turbidity (NTU) I 9.0 Turbidity (NTU) 19.1
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I .. .2. )7
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 38Y . .2.7 I
1 0
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I A W A L 6-E. L
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs rn 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL rg)
Nutrients en 0 100ml 0 rn H2SO4 C8
Heavy Metals l!1 0 250 ml ~ 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics rn 0 250ml 0 III No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha ~ 0 1,000 ml rn 0 HN03 ~
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 I] 0
(;.enc("1\ 1 :r:., o""8~~ ,'<..s If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 7 (). 65 Sample Time L...I _13--..;;..5_0 __ -,
Comment
~ See instruction
i)f'(";vea 01"\ S;+c 0..+ 6,\S, --r;;1Ir1cr Hollid\j prese r1l--FOY p\Ar~E? "'V1~ jQfI'I pJi"J ev"('t7i-.
P\Ar~t... bGjiA.1'1 0..+ 072..D. P~r~~ well -to; 0\. +61-6..1 erf' 3ttO W)lVllA+z:'~. WJ-c{" ~~
(\eo.r ?V\r~~ enc\.e~ d\nA S~yVJples Gol)ed-eJ. ~ }350. l~ S,'-fc eA.+ )46<...
MW-18 11-26-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
I2J
0
~
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
OENISONI),4,4 WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINI:S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 LfTh Q",o-rt~r 6-ro\AnJ Wo..1"c r .2.CI~
Location (well name): IL--M_W_ .... _:J-._2. _________ ----I
Field Sample ID 1 MW-Xl. ... )1.2..b201L
Sampler Name
and initials:
~ See instruction
Date and Time for Purging 1 1172..6/'2.01::<' and Sampling (if different) IL--N_Y._~ _______ ----I
Well Purging Equip Used: IT[] pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) .... 1 _Q_E_D _____ ---'
Purging Method Used: []!]2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event L-I se __ M....;..\_~_t\_n_"'_""\ __ 6W ____ ___I I IV] vJ-Jg Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-_________ ....J
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance L-I _CJ_q_1 _____ ----I1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 <;7. 6 k)
Conductance (avg) 75~Y L--_~~~ ____ ~
pH Buffer 4.0 q,o
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 J1Y,Oo
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 30. 65 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L--___ --'
pH of Water (avg) L-I _g_.7~t _____ ----J
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 IY. 69 Redox Potential (Eh)I SS\ TurbidityL-13_.K __ ....J
Weather Condo IL--_s_~_~r _________ ___I
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)IL....-O_o __ ....J
Time 11 '2ffi Gal. Purged 1 "4.6 \
Conductance 7('03 pH Y ,go
Temp.oC )Q .i3
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I -==So!..::S::::;..;)=---_--'
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I 12..57
Conductance
Temp.oC 119·19
Gal. Purged I bY. g g
pH 1 Q.7Z'
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I .552..
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time I I2..Sb Gal. Purged 1 64.23
Conductance 1 75 q g
Temp.oC I )Y.b3
Redox Potential Eh (m V) _I _5,",-,5=-::..] _----'
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I )2..S~
Conductance I 7.541
Temp.oC
Gal. Purged 1 64. bZ:
pHl q·77
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L..:I 5::;.;;5~::t __ ....J
Turbidity (NTU)
I
. I
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1L.-~_2_)7 ___ ---I T=2V/Q= In;i.SO I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs 1tJ 0 3x40 ml 0 1sJ HCL El 0
Nutrients 't1 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 rl 0
All Other Non Radiologics lJ 0 250ml 0 ~ No Preserv. 0 ~
Gross Alpha rEI 0 1,000 ml "'fl 0 HN03 t:J 0
Other (specify) fl 0 Sample volume 0 'tj 0 ~
&enerD\.\ :rn 0 r~ ii\1J iGj If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth L.-I .....\4_£_,7.:...) __ ----1 Sample Time 1-1 _13_00 ____ -'
Comment
~ See instruction
Ar"';\le.~ 01'1 SI1-<. ",+ o-rSY ... "'nner.... Bon:~~ pr~-t-.fo; 'P\Ar~e. "'nA .s'1",1;~ eve .. 1-.
Fv..r~ ~~I\ <1\1-o goo. ?v.r~t:~ ~e\l +0(", 0... -t-o-tc..l o~ 300 l'V);J1\A1es
\NJ-~r \A)~ ty)os+~ C.1eC\(· :PV\r~'C. -e'1a't~ ~T1J. 5V.Y\1F}e~ (olJ{,c,+<,J q+ 1'300
Le:fl-SJf<. tA.-t-)3 J )
MW-22 11-26-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I·OENISONI)~.4
. MINI:S
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHM:ENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
yi); Q~o..rfer &("Ou",(3:wo..+«:::r ..2.0)2.
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1..-1 ~_VJ_-23 ___________ --J
Sampler Name
and initials: I=t'o.nn-C::f HoI) iaO\~I""""H
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 11/z.8"/201<.. and Sampling (if different) }2./5/201Z.
Well Purging Equip Used: [QJpump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [][I 2 casings [gJ3 casings
I ~W-}7 Sampling Event 1 SeTV)IC\(}Y>\J.OJ (r~ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1..-_________ ----1
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 q.O
Specific Conductance ..... 1 _<l_9_~~ ___ ..... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): )3.2.00
Depth to Water Before Purging I, \ L\. 2. () Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 )]. b2 1(·653h)
3" Well: D (.367h) '-----_ ......
Conductance (avg) '--_?>;;;;......I4_O_Q.L.---_____ ..... pH of Water (avg) b .18
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1'"'""'-1_:,_.1_'1"---_ ...... Redox Potential (Eh)l .... s_l_2 __ ..... TurbiditylL..../_.5 __ .....
Weather Condo I ?"' ... .}~ Cl 0 lAj...'j Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)IL--_"3_l>_----'
Time 1 0 890 Gal. Purged 1 2.1 .70 Time 1 I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 1 340q pH b.IS Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC I I ~, 19 Temp.oC I 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) SIX 1...-___ ---1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 1
Turbidity (NTU) {. S Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I 559 Gal. Purged .... 1 _0 ___ ...... Time 119/0 1 Gal. Purged 1 () 1
Conductance 2?\ 0 I pH I G. 70 Conductance 13909 I pH I "G .. ~1 I
Temp.oC 113.SG Temp.oC 1 1~.~g 1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) S \ I '---------I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 50Lf I
Turbidity (NTU) £) . 0 Turbidity (NTU) I '/-:5 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged 21.7D gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1 • .2.11 T = 2V/Q = I IOt.J2 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 ),g,
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I ~\·IO
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs IA W It L G-E. L
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs ~ D 3x40 ml D ~ HCL it]
Nutrients lJ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 "tJ
Heavy Metals 1tJ D 250ml ~ D HN03 !l
All Other Non Radiologics 'E1 D 250ml D ~ No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha 1!J D 1,000 ml ~ D HN03 ~
Other (specify) ID D Sample volume D ~ D
&d'erJ :r:flD("~o.},\ i!..S. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1..-11_3_0_6_0_0 __ ----1 Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
A(ri'\)e~ on site <71:1 Of,5S. ~I'\ner iA...,o.. &&1.((;(\ pre~e..,+ -f'Of' pU.i~e. f>u.r~~ be~C(r, (;t-t 0700.
f"'r~~.\ v:lel\ fOr "'-+01-.... \ of' 10D W1;nlA+~. f'''r~ea We'll J.f~ 1. "' .... +",-"'~ r>1o.s-:'~ cJe"!/". f",r~G. en,)..,!. ",t 08''10. L.,fr fort<=. ,d-084 I. ;:'\0"'" ~r", }eG{'('MeJ WI-r;l well ''In J'::]
'Ac-r;\Jd. on ~i+c.. o...} rSbt;. )~YlnGl o"''l~ CrtA.rr,'V\ prcscn-+-+o coned Sa.n-tplc:~.
Pep}l.., i--D l,..)Q..Tc r \.V~ 121.7fc. ~otMp)e.s co}Jec..}ca d\,+ JL/oo Lc+1 ~,+c q+ }LJ} I
MW-23 11-28-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
~
D
KI
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
. II ~ENISONij~~~-··
. MINI:S ----Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
1 4Th Q\AtA.(fe-f" G-ftJUYll ~",-f~r ~DJ<"
Sampler Name
~ See instruction
Location (well name): L-I N_\J\J_-_z_Lf=----________ ---J and initials: fj;f'lTll!('" J-JoJ };J~ /-J'"J1
Field Sample ill
Date and Time for Purging 1 J1/~g 120/10 and Sampling (if different) L-I _lJ_/:2_q_J:2._o _I< _____ ......I
Well Purging Equip Used: [}[]pump or [If] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) II-Q_t:_D _____ ---J
Purging Method Used: [JJJ 2 casings [If]3 casings
I MW-.z3
Sampling Event 1 .sl!.ml~Y)(JIAG\' 6-w Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-_________ ......I
pH Buffer 7.0 -,. 0 pH Buffer 4.0 g.o
Specific Conductance ,-I _q-=-4~ ____ ...... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 J.20 .00
Depth to Water Before Purging 1114.35 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 3. b~ 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '----_ ........
Conductance (avg) LJ'18-'. '----------~ pH of Water (avg) S./O '---------------~
Well Water Temp. (avg) l 1 t .. LLJ4 Redox Potential (Eh)l 50-1 Turbidityl'---O_.7 __ ......I
Weather Condo I 'Cl \ \ . r Ar-t~ C 10 uG\~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)'-IO_o __ ---J
Time l OCJ2S Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I '-1Y8k, pH 5.-,0 Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC 1 ]'j,g4 Temp.oC 1 1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I SD7 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0.7 Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time 1 DbS3 Gal. Purged 1> Time 1070fc 1 Gal. Purged 1 0 1
Conductance 1953g pH 15.70 Conductance 1'1515 1 pH 16.01 1
Temp.oC 1]5.19 Temp.oC I Itt to ~~ 1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 5_~_9" __ ........ Redox Potential Eh (mV) 15)"1 1
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I :3.5 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume o~&tef~\fed 1'"""1 -'-.~b~g----' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = ,--I ...;....I. JL.....l.~2.=--__ -..I T = 2V/Q = I 38','43 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 7.CB
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I AWA L 6-EL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs lJ D 3x40 ml D "EJ HCL ~ D
Nutrients lJ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals ~ D 250 ml ~ D HN03 ~ D
All Other Non Radiologics l[] D 250ml D E9 No Preserv. D -E1
Gross Alpha ~ D 1,000 ml 19 D HN03 'tJ D
Other (specify) 'f£I D Sample volume D ~ D EJ
G-(;nc('A.\ -;:r::l1l>(~o. '" ~ <.~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth" 1,...;...;..;1 $~'....a;4S=-__ --I Sample Time IL-Ofb_-=:;0~ __ -..I
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-2411-28-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ill ~~NM'lsN~ENsl)i .4] WHIT:~:S~~~~~~~ MILL
.! _ FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
.. 0._1 See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: 1 '-111'\ Qv..o..r-te(" &",o\'\n~ WO\.+er a..01':l.
Location (well name): 1-1 ....jMJ-;...;.W_~_2 ..... ~=-_________ ---I
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 ~1')Yle.r Ho lhJ~!1 Irn
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 1)/J 2.)1..01-:2.. and Sampling (if different) ,v/A ~~--------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) CA En ~--------------~
Purging Method Used: [![]2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event l .seM~OI.Y\ nu.oJ &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I-~_t_,j~_"···\i_i\;_~-_i._1 ' ______ ~
pH Buffer 7.0 1-1 _,_,_0 _____ ----' pH Buffer 4.0
.A1W-31
\..).0
Specific Conductance 1-1 _'t_'~-'---___ ----II !lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1-1 _i_: ]_~ _____ ~ 11b.6~
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 7~ .S"=-Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ?-"J. Db 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '--___ ---J
Conductance (avg) ~186 '------~----------~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 ,Y .. ~2... Redox Potential (Eh) 1 .s 09 Turbidity ..... 1 Ll_ . .5 __ ~
Weather Condo l ____ -=--________ ---I . SVvY\~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ..... 1 __ g_b _~
Time Gal. Purged 1 b 1 . g'1 Time I l'~ O.b Gal. Purged 1 G.'< -oz:
Conductance 1 3> t g5 pH 1 G.3t:} Conductance ~)8)
Temp. °C I J q I ~"\ Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1-1 .:=.SIl-09--L __ ~ Redox Potential Eh (m V) &...;1 5;;;;;..O.;;,..Cf..L..-_~
Turbidity (NTU) 15·Y Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 '~O-1 Gal. Purged 1 61: .. 27 Time 1 130?> Gal. Purged G=<.41
Conductance I ~ 17 '1 pH L...::16==-·--'Y3'---_~ Conductance I 217ft I pH Ib,97
Temp.oC I ) 9~ 25 Temp.oC 11L].27 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ,504 L.....;;;;;~~_-.I Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ...;;;£;;;...OJ--.l-_~
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 6~,q~ gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I · 2\1
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I 2. '-lGt. 45 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1-0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I AvJAL &EL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 111 D 3x40 ml D 121 HCL ~ D
Nutrients (] D 100ml D []I H2SO4 rB D
Heavy Metals ~ D 250ml 11 D HN03 ~ D
All Other Non Radiologics 111 D 250ml D III No Preserv. D ~
Gross Alpha III D 1,000 ml rn D HN03 ~ D
Other (specify) II D Sample volume D rn D Qg
Crenefb...\ -:l:" 0 '('~o..f\' 0 If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ..... 1 _7_5_.,_1 ___ ...... Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-25 11-12-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
\-
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL F~-~f9~pl~ FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I' l.f1'l1 Q",(),.rtGf" &-rOv.r\~wD-.=teJ :2.01'2..
... ~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1 '-M ____ W_-_2._.b __________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: I --r:;:-Yln~(" jJ 0 11 iJA~ iT»
Field Sample ill
Date and Time for Purging 1 11/ 15/2 0 12 and Sampling (if different) fi//A ~---------~
Well Purging Equip Used: IT!Jpump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 Gont"Y\\Ao\J\.$
Purging Method Used: [gJ2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event : S<o:rtlil>:l1t'1w-\ G-w Prev: Well Sampled in Sampling Event I~M_W_-_~_~ ______ ~
pH Buffer 7.0 '1.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance ..... 1 _9..:...9..;...1J--__ ~1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 121.33
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 " \ • 03 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well: I 30..,37 1(·653h)
3" Well: D (.367h) 1....-___ .......
Conductance (avg) ~'-\J ~ ~----~----------~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \9 .. qg Redox Potential (Eh)1 1....'-\3 TurbidityL-l_o=--__ -I
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) ..... I-....:;2....;.6 __ --'
Time I 072t:t I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time Gal. Purged
Conductance I ;'\..17~ I pH I ~.~ I Conductance
Temp.oC 119·9g 1 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2.:\-; 1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 2}-·~~:S ~
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 1 Turbidity (NTU) I n I
Time I 1 Gal. Purged I 1 Time Gal. Purged
Conductance I 1 pH I 1 Conductance pH 1'---__ ----'
Temp.oC I 1 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) .... 1 ___ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 1 Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged o gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I )0. q
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I D I
ID
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I A~AL Crr: L-
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs 00 D 3x40 ml D ~. HCL ~
Nutrients TlJ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 19
Heavy Metals ~ D 250 ml ~ 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics ~ D 250ml D ~ No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha rs D 1,000 ml ~. D HN03 ~
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ D
&e()~r~\ :ry\O~Q\f\;G~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I ) 12. .32 Sample Time 6730
See instruction
Comment
A ...... i \l ,,;). on S rt e ad-072.'-\. --r..nncr ,"0 lll~ ~s."n+ +0 GOII" & SIlr>1p)e~.
2:>~"IV\?'~ (.c>'le.c:r~~ ~ 0130. VJo..--ter W~~ C.)ea.f'_
l-e~ ~\~"C-~+ 0737
MW-2611-15-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
0
~
D
~
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: Lfih Qv.fA.t'"fer G-rtHAY'laWo..+er' .2.0)2.,
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 Jv\:....:....;W...;;...--::; .. J..~q _________ ----J
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 ~nner Hon,'J6.+1!r1t
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 11/)J1/tJ-CJ 1'2-and Sampling (if different) ..... 1 ~_j1_:t\ ________ --,
Well Purging Equip Used: I][] pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) QED L--______________ ~
Purging Method Used: 002 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I S':MJ Anti\). '" \ G-1A1 Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event IL---~_W_-_15 ______ ......
pH Buffer 7,0 I. () pH Buffer 4.0 q.D
Specific Conductance L-I _1.:....1.;....4:....-__ ~1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 11:)..7. ()()
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 1 02.. DS Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 1£ .~~ 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L---___ --'
Conductance (avg) L--'-\.....;...:..1_1 .... 3'--__________ ~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 11Q, q7 Redox Potential (Eh)L-12_1 0 __ --' Turbidity 1 ..2.}. 3'2..
Weather Condo l __ ,(,. ___________ ---I -~I..\,I"'\~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)L-1 b_f) __ ---I
Time 1 1 '3> '-\S Gal. Purged 1 3:2.,55 Time 1 t~ '-l.b Gal. Purged 132. 76.
Conductance 97'2: pH 1 C:;.t.\7 Conductance 1 q7l7
Temp.oC Temp.oC 1 1'1~ 50
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I =2~16 __ ----I Redox Potential Eh (m V) IL---~_)_O __ --,
Turbidity (NTU) 1 ~O Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 )3'1J Gal. Purged 1 ~2.,,9g Time 1 t:~'1g Gal. Purged I 33.2.t>
Conductance 9 n:t: pH k; .. "if Conductance I qF J 13 pH 1 G. LJC!
Temp.oC Temp.oC 1 )9.50
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 2.10 Redox Potential Eh (m V) IL---~_\_O __ --,
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 33.'-3 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I · ;2...11
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I \ SD. is I
10
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I Aw A L &-E L
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs rn 0 3x40 ml 0 121 HCL Ii 0
Nutrients rB· 0 100 ml 0 rll H2SO4 ~. 0
Heavy Metals [tj 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 ~ 0
All Other Non Radiologics [l] 0 250ml 0 ..e:J No Preserv. 0 ~
Gross Alpha rn 0 1,000 ml ~ 0 HN03 .lE 0
Other (specify) IE 0 Sample volume '0 TB 0 m
&efle../Al :r:nD"~I1\f)l G) If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I \ 0 ~ . 55 Sample Time L-I..;.-.l '6_5_D __ ----'
Comment
~ See instruction
Au-'ve6. Dr) .s;.}G "'+ 111'2 --f'",~"..... 11011; 6.~ Ve!>erd--hI" fv..r~ "",J,..s IAl'1pJ:~ eve,,?_
Pv..(~e bt[)A.Y) tJ....~ 11 15. ?u.\~c:c\ w-ellfo,.. tiv ~o+ .... 1 of' lSS Yr)J~\A.+~. wtd-er w~
M\)'I~~ PlA('~e ~naej t:).,Y'\~ .sQ.rYlf1~ Go11ec.~eJ tAt 1:350. Le-t:'t SITe tK1-J'-l1J1
MW-2911-14-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r'--'---"'-"--"--"-"'~ I OENlsoNI)~~ .L. MIN(;S '. !
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
1 L11h G.v.o..,..rGr G-rOU-Y1a W~+'C(" 2012.
Location (well name): ..... 1 ...:..M-'--W_-_'S;;;;...;..l _________ ......
Sampler Name
and initials:
Field Sample ID 1 MW-'31_} 1 Dc::'A01~
~ See instruction
Date and Time for Purging 1 } 1/ b/.2.01'~ and Sampling (if different) ..... 1 /1/_:/._14 _______ -.....1
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ,--I Q_E_J)=-____ --J
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event 1 Se,JV\·\~YlnlA.o\'\ (;..\f] Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I L.. N_V,_:4.. _______ --J
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 1 '"1.0
Specific Conductance ,--I Gf_!f....:,1 ____ ...... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 J 3D.oo
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 b 7. g .b Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 t.t () • &] 1(·653h)
3" Well: 6 (.367h) '-----_ ......
Conductance (avg) I P/7S '--~~------~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 P:L J LJ Redox Potential (Eh) ,--I 4_55 __ ----1 Turbidity ...... 1 _0 __ -.....1
Weather Condo
Time I l:)YD I Gal. Purged
Conductance I l~ 7]; I pH
Temp.oC I lt1.Jll I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~S4
r-'
Turbidity (NTU) I 0
Time 1]392 I Gal. Purged
Conductance I 17.i7b I pH
Temp.oC I lqf7~ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1951:
Turbidity (NTU) I b
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
I g~\59 I
1 b~710 I
I
I
I gl:S.~7 I
I 7.C) 1 I
I
I
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling e~ent) ..... 13_o __ ~
Time ..... 1 1_3_Y_'_-.....I Gal. Purged I 83.7'{'
Conductance I 1 Q7Y
Temp.oC I 1'1.7~
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ............ '1._5.J:_st--_--I
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 11393
Conductance 11 ~ 75
Temp.oC I )'4 .. 7)
Gal. Purged I g y ~ ) <Of
pH 17.04
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ..... t1--"""S=5 __ --I
Turbidity (NTU) 0
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ., :;2.}7
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ~73~qg I
1 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1-1 A_\J_A_L __ ..;;;G~&_t.... __ --I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs ~ D 3x40 ml D ~ HCL ~
Nutrients 'fJ D 100 ml D :EJ H2SO4 <f:l
Heavy Metals ~ D 250ml '£l D RN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics ~ D 250ml D l!1 No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha ~ D 1,000 ml 1:1 D RN03 'fI
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D t!1 D
G<Yltl"O\.\ Ino~tl'lnl-~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I f7 J , !5 Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
Ar.-iveA on S.-+c= 0..+ 071) ~nl1e.r &ff1~ ~t1I.rr"" pre.(eJ?+ +Or p\.Ar~-e.... ~tt.{ j~JN1 lJ'n
ev ~fl-t. p"",~(.., ~"'y\' ",t O~ IS. ?"",~ea well ,r,;'r A -10+,,,,) Cl? 31ll rr'lJ"v..+e.s. f V
v.J "" -+ er iAl<1..S G \ ea.c +), r"~h out r"l\rj e . 'P \J\"'~ e e(l.le.~ "V' d.. ~""" f'&.S <olJecJ..e4
o..-t '~Y.5. Ld)-Site. 4 1355
MW-31 11-06-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
~
D
~
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
[------------------------------1 ATTA CHMENT 1-2 J.oE~F9Et>~~1 FIELD DA~:~~=:~~~~~~:~DWATER ~ See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: 1 '111\ Q.",o,,,,,+<.r &-ro\Anot W ~e("" ~l~
Location (well name): ,-I _JII1_W_-_3_~..:__ ________ ___'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 ~""Gr tJollla~::1 /(11
Field Sample ill
Date and Time for Purging 1L..-)_I~_b...;../_:2.._0.......;J.......;<:::..._ ___ ____' and Sampling (if different) L..;I /\I~/A~ _______ .......
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) QED '------------~
Purging Method Used: 00]2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I 5 ~,.,\ q, 11" "'DI.\ G-W Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event 11-_/JI_W_oJ_3_1 ______ __I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D pH Buffer 4.0 14.0
Specific Conductance 1-1 _q_'1--,,~ ___ ----,1 [lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 13~156
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 ,11. ~q Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 37~q~ 1(·6.53h)
3" Well: () (.367h) 1--=-__ ~
Conductance (avg) ~g<1~ '-----~-----~
pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 Jl4. 9 g Redox Potential (Eh)IS3g TurbiditYI,--'3_2. __ ~
Weather cond·1 '-__ S_"'"_V\_f)_~ _________ __I
Ext" Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)I1-:3_b __ ____'
Time 1 13% Gal. Purged 177 .0.3
Conductance 1 :3 q D3
Temp.oC 1 111.QQ
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 3~A.....;Y:..-_ .......
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 11)Z7
Conductance I '3 $ ~5
Temp.oC
1 3)
Gal. Purged I 77. Lj£
pH 1 C.2:C
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ':S'10 1--___ --'
Turbidity (NTU) ::'2..$
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time 113.2." Gal. Purged 177. Q..5
Conductance 1 33"f1 pH 1 ".2.1
Temp.oC 114.$1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1-1 _~_3_1..) __ --,
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I 1 ~ ~g Gal. Purged 177,' ~
Conductance 1 311 09 pH I l> 123
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ,-I 35--..,;.._9 __ .......
Turbidity (NTU) 133
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ..... 1 7_(_, J_~ ___ ~ gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I .. 2.17
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I 3'-i<j. 7.:3 I
It>
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I trw It L. (y c L
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL [5iJ 0
Nutrients 111 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals rn 0 250ml m 0 HN03 [gI 0
All Other Non Radiologics ~ 0 250m! 0 ~ No Preserv. 0 ~
Gross Alpha og 0 1,000 m! [29 0 HN03 ~ 0
Other (specify) lSI 0 Sample volume 0 -m 0 11J'
G-<,Y\erl1-.\ ;:t:Y'lOf'~~1)i<>S If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 80 410 Sample Time L-11;;..;;;33_b ___ ......
Comment
~ See instruction
A("n\\Je~ on S~·t'C ~-t 07~~. -r"'/1.71nGr" (}.y)). (}~rf"\Y) ?,~erd~ .for f",,-r6e c.tn~ .s~~tJ\~ -e\J~Y)t.
P\A~e be~~Y\ IJ'.t 07~D4 Pv..I~ea. \Nell for fA. 1-o+tA.l of 3bO WI ;Y1l.f\.-t~.i ~ w~t~r ~S
#. Lti-l<. ~v.r~. PV\.(~~ end.t:A tA.f\~ S~y.t\f1cs Cc>11t:cte4 ~ 133D.
MW-3211-06-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 r----------------------------------------------------------------------1 i &)ENlsoNI)~~1
L.J~'UNI:S _ I FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Description of Sampling Event: 1 l..fI1'-Q\A()..(fer G-rou.,C\\No...+e(' :;2.0 \2,.
Location (well name): 1-1 _M_W_-_3_7 __________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1-J~f/J1er "Ho)J.'J\o.~/TJt
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 1\) ;l.77'Z.o\~ and Sampling (if different) 12/5/201"<..
Well Purging Equip Used: @]pump or lla 1 bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1-1 ~_Y_A ______ ----I
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event 1 Serr1l~nt1\W.\ &w Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event II-_M_vJ_~_O_.s ______ __I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 1 4 .0
Specific Conductance 1-1 _19_q ____ ...... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 )2.1. ~O
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 lOb, 35 4" well:1 ~ .7b 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '--------I
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) \4.YO Redox Potential (Eh)1 4'i\ 0 TurbiditYL-1 _17_0 __ --1
Weather Condo I-I_S_\..\_n_n_~ __________ ____' Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)L-I'_O_o __ --'
Time Gal. Purged 1-1 _5 ___ --' Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH I b,gt Conductance pH 1--1 __ ----'
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) q l1 0 1...-.---:... __ ----1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) ,'---___ --1
Turbidity (NTU) , 70 Turbidity (NTU)
Time , 17>09 Gal. Purged D Time ,1327 Gal. Purged
Conductance pH 7 .O~ Conductance 1 45X'" pH 1 "1·09
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 511 Redox Potential Eh (m V) ...... 1 _5_0_9 __ --'
Turbidity (NTU) o Turbidity (NTU) 1 :r:S, J
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
lSek;r~
V olume of Water Purged 19 gallon(s}
AJ?rer
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = L.-I __ 0 ___ --, T = 2V /Q = I c> I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) J.Y3
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I AWA L GEL-
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs lJ 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL ~
Nutrients 1tJ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ILl
Heavy Metals If] 0 250 ml ~ 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics l!l 0 250ml 0 r:J No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha tEl 0 1,000 ml ~ 0 HN03 ~
Other (specify) [] 0 Sample volume 0 1!J 0
G-eI'l-e.t"'A' '"1.Y'lor~~n~c~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I ) 2..) • b \ Sample Time 131D
Comment
~ See instruction
A("~i..:Je6. on ~,te ~1-13Yk -)Ml1er o..Y'\d &-o..((in fre.serrT +0(" b",,"~\in~.
5o..;',n~ be~~Y) o-..t Y~S() .. Bo..:)el ".. +o-tG\.' of )1.\ &Q.1\o'r)~. ~~J-eJ. W~\\ J.(j.
V-'t\.ter S1-""rt~~ c..'~o...r hv..1-~o~ ~\ A~ lAS. \Ne, bu-.: \ (;a. lJ=t s ,+-e ~+' 1Y 13.
Aril\Jea ot) s;te ~+ )30 t;, -r"'Y'lno· ~..,tA. G-~rr;., 0'" .s,1-c. -1-0 c.oltec.t St{f'VIpJ(s.
Dept~ -to ~(d't/ .. WIA~ llb,~l, S~f'I\pk::' bc.:\ca e..+-1~10 L<:ft s,'1-c: c:tt 1333
MW-37 11-27-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
EJ
0
l!1
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
i.-.. -.-.. ----.-.-.--~··--··-.. -·· .. ····--
I OENISONI)~~
I MINI:S I
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
1 q 1"1"\ Q""o.f'ter Gro,-"nJWa..+e( .2..01'Z
~ See instruction
Location (well name): L-I M:.....:.....;W_-_7..;,.O _________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: l:::r lAr1n~(" +to)) "a~ IT1J
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 11/2 &7201<. and Sampling (if different) L-I M_1._~ ________ ....J
Well Purging Equip Used: [QJpump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ,-I Q_1S_D _____ ---'
Purging Method Used: [ID 2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 ~ ~rt'\I~f)Y'v.(A1 (, W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I '-_M_W_-_O_S ______ ....J
pH Buffer 7.0 /,0 pH Buffer 4.0 I '-4.0
Specific Conductance 1'--4_9_q ____ ...... 1 !!MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 11:2.00
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 7Q, 30 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ;LLL ~) 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '-----_ ......
Conductance (avg) 4170 '----------~ pH of Water (avg) L-I _6_,_5_7 _____ ---1
Well Water Temp. (avg) I I Y .27 Redox Potential (Eh)14C1'Z.. Turbidity 1'---0 __ ----'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)L-1 _-_3 _d
_----'
Time Gal. Purged Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance pH Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time Gal. Purged Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance pH Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ..;2. \ J
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ~f>.8~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated b
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs A~AL &EL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs r:J D 3x40 ml D ~ HCL 19 D
Nutrients E D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 fJ D
Heavy Metals .l1 D 250 ml "tl D HN03 i!1 D
All Other Non Radiologics E D 250ml D lJ No Preserv. D 'fJ
Gross Alpha ltSl D 1,000 ml "lJ D HN03 1!:1 D
Other (specify) llJ D Sample volume D 1] D ~
&ener~\ ;::n()f"~<Af\ ;(.~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1..0.-'1 $""-7...:....;...:..1.:-] __ ---' Sample Time ..... 1 \_0_11...:...;5;;;;;..-. __ --1
Comment
~ See instruction
o-f Mw-)1
MW-70 11-28-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabC
Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
Tab C1
Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
October 2012
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL FE-;;P~~I FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: IOG.'fObeT Mon+h I~ G-rO\An(;t\wo..+~('" ;2.01Q...
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 M_W_-l_' __________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: I-ro..tltl~r 'lJ~J}i;Q.!1J-rij
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 10/~/2..01'2.. and Sampling (if different) ..... 1 _N_I._:A _______ ---'
Well Purging Equip Used: 110 Ipump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) .... 1 Q_E_D _____ ---'
Purging Method Used: []f] 2 casings [gJ 3 casings
Sampling Event lJv\oni-'hlY G-VJ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ..... IY_W_-_3_D _____ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 _Cf...;...q...;...q"--__ --'I !lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 13D~ 00
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 ~7. 55 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ~1.J \ 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L..-___ ......
Conductance (avg) .... 1 ...;...!2......;;.~~7-t.] _____ ---I pH of Water (avg) 7.~
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 11-1 "qs Redox Potential (Eh) .... 1 _5..;:;03"--_--' Turbidity ..... 1 _0 __ ---'
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) .... 1 1.4_0 __ --'
Time Il?-!)D Gal. Purged 167.27 Time 1 12DJ I Gal. Purged 1 :(;,. Lig I
Conductance 1 ~Lfb~ pH 7,'3g Conductance 1 2~hg I pH 1/13g I
Temp.oC I Pi. l11 Temp.oC I )'-l.qS I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I S0 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 5~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I '0 Turbidity (NTU) I C2 I
Time 112.02 Gal. Purged b 7.70 Time 11203 1 Gal. Purged I 67.Cf2. 1
Conductance 1 ~~/.3 pH 171 '38 Conductance 1.2. 'f7~ 1 pH 17.3'1 1
Temp.oC I ~r:t~ Temp.oC I 1\:).'1'3 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) .... 1 .=5.3=-__ --' Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 50 I
Turbidity (NTU) o Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 1
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I f,g ~ ~ gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I • ;:t17
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I ;2.S~.~ g I
o
o
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I L.. .A_M--.;....Ah __ ---=:;G-~e._L __ _..I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients D D 100 ml D D H2SO4 D
Heavy Metals "El D 250ml ~ n HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ..... 1 _~_1_ . .:..8 -'-] __ ...... Sample Time 12.D5
Comment
I:;j See instruction
A,t"\l-e.d 01\ ~l:.te. 0..1-ObLl'=:> ~ "'-;"nYl~(' 0..(\"" G-o..rj\'n ?("es~Y\+ +Or pu('~-e ~7'1J 5 ClMpJ,'''23 event.
'P\A1'~-e. b~~eJ.Y'\ ~-t-ObSO. P\A<~e:a lA)e.1' ~("' IA }o+~) o-F ~)~ }Y);t1lAtc..( \A)~-h:r
lA)~ cleo.f""' +hro~hOL.d-1-hl: pu.('"~ c. Pur5C -e)1deJ W1c1 sa.n1p1~ Co llec.+~~ J-
\~DS. L~ sf'-rG d\.1-12D7 ,
MW-ll 10-23-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
i-----------------···-------------·-----1
i.iOENISON. ~~~I { MINE~
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
I OG1-obe.r JAoY\:th13 Gro\A()d\~(A+er :;2.0}<
~ See instruction
Location (well name): .... 1 M_\)\)_-l_~"___ _________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: I :::rtf..YWler l}o lh;t:~J11j
Field Sample ID IMW-)q~ 10.:2.31bl'2.
Date and Time for Purging I lo/.23/2D)'2... and Sampling (if different) #/~ ~~~-------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IL.......;.Q--:;;f. ...... D=-____ .....
Purging Method Used: I'D 12 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I J1oY\+bl~ G-W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-1_M_VV_ .... _J_l _____ --I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.D
Specific Conductance L-I --'q:.....1_q ___ ~1 IlMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I L2i:7D
Depth to Water Before Purging I I C3,bO Casing Volume (V) 4" well:I ]" ~15 1(·653h)
3" Well: C> (.367h) L--___ --'
Conductance (avg) 3:> ~s:z L--__________ ~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I JY4 7 Cf Redox Potential (Eh )1 .... .L...;;\ 3:..-:7 __ --1 TurbiditylL-_D __ ---I
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)IL..l.14~o __ .....
Time 1 l:2:g l:r I Gal. Purged 1 37.~7 1 Time I-t£-3-J Gal. Purged 1 38. J<f
133D
Conductance 13 "150 1 pH 1 7 ,01 I
J:S3J
Conductance 1 3 q:s2 pH 1 b, qS
Temp.oC I 19,{i I Temp.oC I lY .. 8J
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I t~\ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) .... 1 ..;..;:lJb""'-=-__ ......
Turbidity (NTU) 1 b 1 Turbidity (NTU) I 0
Time I ~ I Gal. Purged 1 ~g.Go I
13:3:2. I ~'53 1 CJ51 Conductance I pH I
Time F¥$3 Gal. Purged 1 3g,,~QO
1'3~3
Conductance I 3"155 pH 1 b .!3
Temp.oC I 19. ~o I Temp.oC I )Q,78
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 Piv I Redox Potential Eh (mV) IL--IY_' __ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 6 1 Turbidity (NTU) 0
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged I 3Zf, DC; gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ' 2.1"1
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I 15 J I bb I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs L-16_e._L. ______ ----I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below)
VOCs D D 3x40 ml
Nutrients D D 100 ml
Heavy Metals ~ D 250 ml
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml
Other (specify) D D Sample volume
Final Depth I J03. &7 Sample Time )335
Comment
Y N
D D
D D
'EJ D
D D
D D
D D
Y
HCL D
H2SO4 D
HN03 ~
No Preserv. D
HN03 D
D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
I.:] See instruction
6Q!l
Arr;~e:a 01'\ ~H-~.,d I033,-1o..nller~l')J. 6-()L((';'" f>'('~s~n+-~rr\Ar~e (Arlcl ~ttmFl'~ e)Jt"n1-.
'Pl).'~-e. b~~T\ ti\-t )03S .. 'P\A(~-e~ well ~1 IJ\, ,J-ot4 t 6f 186 rvdn\.A,tcS ~
\j0o-.i-u WIil.S. C\Go-'i", P\A(~< eY1J.e~ II.nc:l. .s~f'\pl~ col1ec,+eA d\:t 13~5.
Le# S,+-e ~t-\'357
MW-14 10-23-2012 IDo not touch this cell (Sh~~tName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 Od\obeY'" MoYTt18 G"fO\Ah~w~i"er :AC)1":l
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 ...;...M....:..W_-_25..;;.;;;;;;.. _________ ........
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 ~nntr Ho});J1!1/'T)}
Field Sample ill
Date and Time for Purging 1 10/2.:2..1.:2.012, and Sampling (if different) N/A ~~~------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [![] pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IL--Q_t._D _____ --I
Purging Method Used: 00 2 casings [gJ 3 casings
Sampling Event 1 N 01\1"1')1.'1 G-W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L...I_/JI_vJ_~_3_\ ____ ~
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Specific Conductance L-I ----.:.1~.L.4..L.-__ ----I1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 ~ 15,00
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 73, 2k Casing Volume (V) 4" well:I 2-I.?'s 1(·653h)
3" Well: b (.367h) L--~ __ """"
Conductance (avg) ~_~...;;;2....;.4..L2,..;;:;r.... _____ --, pH of Water (avg) l~b;...;...,=53=-_____ --I
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lq .7"(:) Redox Potential (Eh)l lq1 TurbiditYL-1 ~_1 __ --I
Weather Condo l __ ( ___________ ---' _ ~ \A)'\-of\(
Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)Ia....;:)...;..J6 __ ~
Time 1 12J~
Conductance 152'13
Temp.oC 119· 15
Gal. Purged 1 b 8 ·33
pH 1 b.S3
Redox Potential Eh (mV) L-12_o9.....:.-_---I
Turbidity (NTU) I ;2.1. g
Time 112..1g Gal. Purged I C;3.78
Conductance I 3X9t> pH lL-b_,_S5 __ ---I
Temp.oC I 14. /0
Redox Potential Eh (mV) L-I _11.:...' __ ---1
Turbidity (NTU) I ~J
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time 1 12J3 Gal. Purged I GZ. 57
Conductance 13t2-~LJ
Temp. °C 119.107
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I a.,O::L
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1121:S Gal. Purged ~/lf. 00
Conductance I '3""9) pH I b·:SLf
Temp. °c I'P::), C;6J
Redox Potential Eh (mV) L...ll_'...;.,.9 __ ----I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~. g
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ' .?17
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I 2.51. 20 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I D
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I A',JA L 1 & f ~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals rn 0 250 ml ~ 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 75.?3:l Sample Time 1:2..1S
Comment
~ See instruction
A('r~ ,,~~ on S ;te
PW"ejt2.. be~ ~ r)
WlA--te. (" ~~ 1>-
<At Ob"SD. ~Y)rnr ~f)J., G-LArr:f"j f>rt!s~)'1-T ,fbr p'\Af(j~ 6-ntl. ~Mp1;(J €-ve,.,7-
o.t 0&55_ Pv.,~~d we1] J?,rd\ +070.1 of' 3.2.0 yv'\;YhA1-C.s .
\;#J~ M\A("hS f'V\r~~ t:nJed .... 1)cJ. SCiMl"C. .coueJ-cd .• J-12.JS_ t."ft S};t-(!
oJ-)218'
MW-25 10-22-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 _A_w_ ..... _:2.._fa _________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: ~nne.r ~6)1/d4.j1r~
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 JO/;::ZY/?.Ol2". and Sampling (if different) ..... 1 _M_~_I1-=--______ -"
Well Purging Equip Used: [gJpump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ICO>1+/IJu,Ou.S
Purging Method Used:[gJ2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I PiortlhlY G-W Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I MW-35
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 q.o
Specific Conductance L-I _CJ_q....;.1 _______ 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 11?-1.33
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 ~ 7 ~ SS Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 LJI. "4 IC.653h)
3" Well: ...... ...;:;.,O ___ .....1.(.367h)
Conductance (avg) 3S6~ '-----------------~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg)' 1 19. ~o Redox Potential (Eh) 11-.-155 __ ---1 Turbidity ..... 1 _D __ -"
Weather Condo l __ < __ -'--__________ ---' _ ....:>v..,,"t Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event}l -7 0
Time 1 0 ~'1=J Gal. Purged o Time Gal. Purged
Conductance 1 '356';1 pH I " ~ b.3 Conductance
Temp. °C I lC\, C; 0 Temp.oC
~
Redox Potential Eh (m V) II.-\....:;S;;;;...:S~_-" Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ___ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pH 11.-___ --1
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ___ -"
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I 10:5
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) Ie
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I AwA L 6-E L
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs ~ D 3x40 ml D '8 HCL ~ D
Nutrients '"EI D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ts D
Heavy Metals ~ D 250ml 19 D HN03 'f!I [j
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D 19 D ~
G11 \Of'l'd.e.. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 111/\ 53 Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-26 10-24-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
~ See instruction
Sampler Name
and initials: I -'-~nne,.. Holll~df.Y/-r1f
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I \O/2.:3/~ol~ and Sampling (if different) ..... 1 Al:_/.~~ _______ ---J
Well Purging Equip Used: []TIpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) Gr D ~--------------~
Purging Method Used: 002 casings [QJ3 c'asings
I Mw-~S Sampling Event IMon+-J.'\l.:1 6-W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '---________ ----'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 11.0
Specific Conductance r.....1 _Cf __ tt __ q~ __ .....I1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.O 1 ft): 1L..--11_0o_0_0 __ ---J
Depth to Water Before Purging 115.50 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ~~o 5:2-1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L-..,;., ___ .....I
Conductance (avg) ~bg ~~~~----------~ pH of Water (avg) b7g
Well Water Temp. (avg) I] q . S3 Redo~ Potential (Eh) ..... 1 ~--,-1.J,,--_--, TurbiditYr.....1 ....;:6~_----I
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ..... 1 y_o----I
Time P O.Q.C I Gal. Purged I q7.7~ I Time 11021 I Gal. Purged I Cj7.~S I
Conductance I Q...O~g I pH 1 "flY I Conductance I :;2..0,"& 1 pH I C;.78 I
Temp.oC 11Lt. 5) I Temp.oC I lq.SLI I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2..15 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~lS I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I (:) I
Time I )0.22. I Gal. Purged I CJg.)7 I Time I ID2~ I Gal. Purged 1!::l8,3ZJ I
Conductance I ~Obg I pH I b,~O I Conductance I ?..oz:~ I pH I ',.t.3 I
Temp.oC I 19· 51 I Temp.oC I 110\.57 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~lg I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I .9-..)4 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I D I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I y g . g2. gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I • 2,,\7
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ;;;"O,.b3 I
10
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I-IA_W_ft_L ___ G---.,;..£_L_----'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 rn
Heavy Metals ~ D 250ml ~ D HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) E D Sample volume D f3 D
L:.h \ or; ~~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 7 g · ?O \ Sample Time lO.2..S
Comment
~ See instruction
A('r\\)e~ on ~i+~ 0"1-Ob3S. -r~Y\nGr" ~11A. G-~rrir'\ f,....~S.e..(I+ -Fo~ pu.rf1~ O\YlcA S~Y'7p'I''1j -eveY7T.
fV\'("~-e.. b-e~().Y\ (11.1--O~LJO . Pv..r~~~ \,i)e\l ~r t'A.. +o+~1 o...f 22.S Mj(\\Ates.
wa.-tc<, ~tA& clear'. Pu.f~e eY'lJ.t'c\ 6<",A ~"lMp)es co\lecl-<!'d ..rr 102.5.
L~ .s ;tc Jt-t ID3b
MW-30 10-23-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
~
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
~~;;';~t)~-11 FIELDDA~~::l~Ei~=DWATER ~ Seeins~ction
Description of Sampling Event: I Oc."tobe.r yY\ot\+hl1 6-rounAwo..+er =2.0 l~
Sampler Name
Location (well name): I MW-3 \ and initials: 1 ~y\)1-e(" H~l1J'J~fr}}
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 10/'J..2../::1...oJ7..... and Sampling (if different) rJJA
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 10ED
Purging Method Used: [](]2 casings @]3 casings
I AI/A
Sampling Event I MDY\fh~ &\1\) Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L....-________ __..

pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance L-I ----:ct....:.~....:.~ ___ ....J1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I )30.0b
Depth to Water Before Purging 1L--..:::..b-!.7 .:-" S~Y__..l Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 4 D.,'!, 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) 1.-___ --1
Conductance (avg) I.-.....Il_q.!-J_:i.....l-_____ --I pH of Water (avg) 7.DY
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 19. go Redox Potential (Eh)L..:1 :2.:....--11 __ .....J TurbiditYI-I _0 __ ---1
Weather con.d. LI __ ~ ___________ __..I _ v..t\Y\~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) 1-1 J~l_'D __ --I
Time 113112. Gal. Purged I q D. OS Time 11 3'-\'3 I Gal. Purged I QO.;(7 I
Conductance pH 17.05 Conductance I ]174 I pH I 7.0'1 I
Temp. °c 1 14 ,711 Temp.oC I 1'1.7j I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L...1 _'2-_0;;..-3..1...-_--1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) I .2...1 C I
Turbidity (NTU) o Turbidity (NTU) I Q I
Time I r3q9 I Gal. Purged 1 40~Qg Time 1):SL\s I Gal. Purged I ~O.7() I
Conductance 1 1973 pH L-17t,.;;., . ..;;...DY...:..-_-.....J Conductance I ljlk I pH 17'.65 I
Temp.oC 114.Z?> Temp.oC 11Y. SS I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L...1 .;;....:;1...;;....12. __ ---1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I .2..JL] I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 Turbidity (NTU) I D I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 =! . ?.. \ -, T=2V/Q=!37S,41 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 10
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 10
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs IL--N_W_A...;;L _____ ---'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D 1tI H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) "!1 D Sample volume D ~ D iJ
-rD~ If preservative is used, specify
S '--"-\~o.. -\ L
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Ch\O\\~-e-
Final Depth! 7 D. 8.5 Sample Time 1.....:1 J:....;;3;;.-.'-l..;;;S=-__ .....I
See instruction
Comment
A(r~\)ca.. bY' s;te.. ~t Of,YD -r~"l"\~r (A(l ~ (ftArr:n pr~~f\1-~(,1-~...-?lA('~<::: ti\,,~
S")"/\'Pl;~ e\)en}. P"IAr~~ be~..... a:t-06'15, PlAr~cJ V)alJ ~r "-.. 1-0+,,) ,,-p 4;).0 Mlnvd-es
1Al001-er 1J0GI.~ d eM. f'v. r ~-e -en cl eJ. '" flJ .s",r>')P l<s c "llec...1e-l ",,-t 1 :3 "I S ..
LeJ=-} !;. ,:J.e, d'. ~ \2>50.
MW-31 10-22-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
'----------------------------1 I &)ENISONr;)~~
1 MIN~S .1 FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: IOCtOber Ae>MJy GrDv.Y1tAv.)(ifcr :::;"O}2.
~ See instruction
Location (well name): IL..lM~W_-3'-=S=--________ ----,
Sampler Name
and initials: I""~ner l1o}Ju1'd!@
Field Sample ill
Date and Time for Purging 1 ID/.2.3/2...C>1'2. and Sampling (if different) &....;1 M-.;..r.;....;;:4'---______ ----'
Well Purging Equip Used: [l[]pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 L....; Q~S:::;;...::::.D::"'-____ --I
Purging Method Used: 00]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I MooR I ~ G-\N Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I,--_M_W_-_J Y _____ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 1-.1 _7~.D ___ --, pH Buffer 4.0 H·o
Specific Conductance ,--I _q.;....;q:....:~ ___ ----II ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 1,2'4·50
Depth to Water Before Purging I \ 1'1. , ;;"D Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ({.D.3 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '--------'
Conductance (avg) 1120q '-----~'-------~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 Jt..t.7Co Redox Potential (Eh)IL-J_5_'1..:..-_--, Turbidity 1'---0 __ ----'
WeatherCond. I C)o\).~ t'{11~ l.)J~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event).....,ll ....... Y'--'CI __ .....
Time Il3'-lS Gal. Purged 1 J q, S3 Time 113';(;' Gal. Purged 1 Pi. 7 Lf
Conductance ,--I _42_11 __ ..... pH G.45 Conductance 1 4 ::2...1'3
Temp.oC I J'-l·71 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) \58' Redox Potential Eh (m V) .... 1 ...a..:15::::;.~ __ ----,
Turbidity (NTU) D Turbidity (NTU) I 0
Time 11.....:1~3.;....~..;...1~_--1 Gal. Purged Time I J'3'1& Gal. Purged I :;1:0 .. Jg
Conductance pH I b.Y4 Conductance I Cf':Xo 5 pH I b,Y3
Temp.oC I J9.80 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) lbb Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1L..-...:...1_b_O __ ......
Turbidity (NTU) o Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ..... 1_2.._o_._b_\ ______ -' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I • .217
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 17L1.D2.. 1
10
10
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs &..;;.16-_E_l ______ ----'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals 1E 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha "iJ 0 1,000 ml 'f!] 0 HN03 ~
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I ] J 3 . () \ Sample Time I L-)-=3;;;..5_0 __ ----'
Comment
~ See instruction
Ard\ll:d. Ol'\ +iY'l~ ",-t 1212.-To:nnel' 6VlJ. G-",r,.:" p-rese..,f-£ ... pv.r(3e <ll.nJ oS"""f )'(j even+.
p u.re~ b~<II.'" &\..} 1.:2.1.5. f "'r~c:a wd \ .£.-"-~01-'" \ ,J;' 'fS M;" ',;-Te~ w .... +cr
~~ c \C:-~r tht£)~~OU..j-1-hCJ f\A(~f' PU.rE3t:.. ~nde..4 '{nil{ .sq,mp}~ col }ecret!
d\t 1"3S0. Left=-~;+e ttt }3S7 )
MW-35 10-23-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 OENISOJ)~~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ~ See instruction
MINr:S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I Ot:.foheT MOY'ltl1/~ Gf'ov..Yli\wCif~( 201.2
Location (well name): 1-1 ..&..M...;.W_--.;;b....;;;5=--________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ==t;..l1ner No J]·/J("JHE
Field Sample ID I MW-f5-1023:2.01~
Date and Time for Purging 110/23/:z.o1'2.... and Sampling (if different) 1-1 ;;....M..L.0_~ _______ ----'
Well Purging Equip Used: @pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I I-_Q_B_D _____ ---'
Purging Method Used: [![]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I JV1 oY\'thlo1 (;. va Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1L....-_Jv1_VV-_J_y _____ --I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D pH Buffer 4.0 Y.O
Specific Conductance L...I _'1..:.....;~:....:I~ ___ ----'1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 124.56
Depth to Water Before Purging 1112..26 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 g. 0.3 1(·653h)
3" Well: b (.367h) '----_.....I
Conductance (avg) 11 2..0~ '--~-~-----~
pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I )g :770 Redox Potential (Eh)I-1 _1S~~_----I TurbiditYL...1 _0 __ ----'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)IL--0 __ ----'
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pHI
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pHI
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged 2.0.61 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I .. .2. 17
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 7Y.02.. I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs IL...-G_&~L ______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals Il 0 250ml t2l 0 HN03 TCI 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha rn 0 1,000 ml r:iJ 0 HN03 ~ 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I ')3 . 0 1 Sample Time 135D
Comment
I ",. See instruction ~-~
MW-65 10-23-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabC2
Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
December 2012
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
["---.. -.. ---.... ---------.---------~.----: .. -----------.-I OENISOJ).4~
I MINI:S ,-------.
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
I DaeiV):&r PlDrrthLj GTDV\Y)Jwder 2QJ2.
Location (well name): I-! ~M-=-W_-..:..\ '~ _________ --I
Sampler Name
and initials:
Field Sample ID
~ See instruction
Date and Time for Purging ! J2/~~I2.DR, and Sampling (if different) I-! JV---=--=/A...:..-_______ --I
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) QED
~------------~
Purging Method Used: [f[]2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event ! MCYI1h\'1 &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ..... _M_w_-_2S ______ --I
pH Buffer 7.0 -J,O pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance ..... ! _'I_&\_~':--___ ----II ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): ! \30.00
Depth to Water Before Purging ! ~7. '3~ Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 £...7. gy 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '-----------'
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) ! \,3. <{;b Redox Potential (Eh)! 32\ Turbidity! ..... _O __ ~
Weather Condo
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event} ..... !-_2_27 __ ....I
Time ! J J 0 I I
Conductance I 2.~:3g
Temp.oC I ]3,,"\D
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I
Turbidity (NTU) I
Time 1)/03 I
Conductance I 2.'141
Temp.oC I \3.ZL}
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I
Turbidity (NTU) I
Gal. Purged 15 S.55
I pH I 7.l1.,3
I
32:t I
0 I
Gal. Purged 1 5S.~B:
I pH I -1.'-/-6
I
3)~ I
0 I
I
I
I
I
/ 1/
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged Sb.Y2 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . 2-11
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ~.b2 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1L-..;;:;&;.,.....=;t:;;;...L ______ --I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml
Nutrients 0 0 100ml
Heavy Metals IE 0 250ml
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume
Final Depth I b ~ . ()::3> Sample Time lIDS
Comment
L...-..._MW __ -l_l_l_2_-2_4_-_20_l_2_--,IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Filtered
y N
0 0
0 0
EiI 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Preservative Type Preservative Added
Y
HCL 0
H2SO4 0
HN03 ~
No Preserv. 0
HN03 0
0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
I
~ See instruction
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
/
2 off / /
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
[----.-.--.---.---.----~ ~ ~-!
!OENISONI) ... j
l-MINE~ . ..,.J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 Dec.crV'l be. ,NloYlfhl;1 &rc,lA1JJwo.+er 2..0)'2,
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 ...;..M_W_-....;.l ..... 'i _________ ---' Sampler Name
and initials: 1 ~t')()er . Hi) J }I(j~ /iN
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 ) 211 5< /20} 'Z-and Sampling (if different) AI/It ~~~------~
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ..... 1 _Q.;....73_D ______ .....I
Purging Method Used: ~2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I JV1 o~#1lv\ 6-IN Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event IL...-M_vJ_-_3_1 _____ ----I
pH Buffer 7.0 Jib pH Buffer 4.0 y.()
Specific Conductance L-I _ ...... q...;,q-t..q __ ----II ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 12$.7°
Depth to Water Before Purging I 103.35 Casing Volume (V) 4" well :I ,6.55 1(·653h)
3" Well : tJ (.367h)
L...-~_.,..----I
Conductance (avg) L....-_.,.....:....:::::2:::..;3~b _____ -J pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 11, \q Redox Potential (Eh)13 ?,..q TurbiditYL-1 ...;;:;O~_~
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 -50
Time I 1032.. 1 Gal. Purged 1 ~·~3 I Time 1033 Gal. Purged 133.5:0
Conductance 1 '1'2.'2-4 1 pH 1 bSg 1 Conductance 1 428' 2.
Temp.oC I 1 ~.1 D I Temp.oC I )). og
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3?S I Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 _2"-2..;;;;..Y"'--_--I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU)
Time I lO3~ I Gal. Purged 1 3~.rn I Time 1 'D35 Gal. Purged 1:3 3. &3
Conductance I Q22.Z1 I pH I b,~7) I Conductance
Temp.oC I 1 L':l.~ I Temp.oC I 1 L3t>
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ''3;2.5 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 523
Turbidity (NTU) 1 5 I Turbidity (NTU) 0
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
/,.
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged I 3Y I 72. gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60= I · 2/7
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 152,Sb I
I 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I A~ A L & £ L
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals L!l' 0 250 ml .~ 0 HN03 ~ 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 1 D4 . '5 Sample Time .... 1..:..1 0_4...;...;:;..D __ ----'
Comment
~ See instruction
Arr;\Jed 0" ::,''Te "'+ 0755. -r.;~n'r" O"'1~ 0-<>(.,.;'1 p"t'.s<'nT-+Of" 'Pv.rae. <>'1'IJ .s"lt''lP):~ eu..,,,t
Pv..r~t: be(1e\'1 ~+-0800, 'PLAr~! v)e 11 ~r I7\. +0+0\1 of' ]£D M J'I)~+-eS. wG\-t('r wa..s
G)e.tA'· ?v..r ~f e()je~ ~v1~ s~Mplc W6\.s. GoJle.c. +~~ ~-t IDYe. L.e-t-r S/~+C o:..f ID Y.5
MW-1412-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
~ See instruction OENISONI)~~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINI:S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I D G(.C'rI\ b <.r M0V1th8 (j-('o\.\nJ yJl1.1-Cr" 2012
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~YJn"C.r }}o}},)a.'j 1m Location (well name): I MW-'2,S ~.~-=~------------------~
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I \-:t/2'1/20l'Z... and Sampling (if different) I'--A.J __ /,.....:~<---____________ ---'
Well Purging Equip Used: [][]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ...... 1 _Q_:E_D ________ -'
Purging Method-Used: 1]I]2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I De.Ge.M~r &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event iL.--M __ W __ -_3S ___________ ......
pH Buffer 7.0 -',0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance r.....1 _'1~~....:.q ___ ...... I!lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I lIS. O{)
Depth to Water Before Purging I 73.00 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ?-" g"Z: ICo653h)
3" Well:r...... _D __ ---'.(.367h)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) Redox Potential (Eh)r.....1 9_1 g __ ~ Turbidity ,--I -"=g :..;;...D __ ......
Weather Condo l ____________ \......:::... __ ------...... _ Clov..cAj
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 -2 (S
Time 10'""10 Gal. Purged Time I IO~] I Gal. Purged I ~g.q:b I
Conductance pH I b. go, Conductance 13L '1:t I pH 1.6·57 I
Temp.oC Temp.oC 1 (3.2:1 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) g ZC; Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 4 z. '1 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 7g Turbidity (NTU) I 7'1 I
Time 1 10\..}2.. Gal. Purged Time 1 10'-13 1 Gal. Pur¥ed I S~.jO I
Conductance 1 3\ '15 pH 1 b.G2 Conductance 1 3 zt'17 1 pH 1 €;.b;<: I
Temp. °C 1 r'S' Z ) Temp.oC 11:3. tf3 1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1913 Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 Y tz. =oJ
Turbidity (NTU) 1 31 Turbidity (NTU) 1 g.s ]
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheetfor Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged 55.33 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ~ 21/
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 12.);2.77 I
I 0
10
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1...1 ~&:....tr.J:::::' ;.::L=--_____ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL D
Nutrients D D 100 ml D D H2SO4 D
Heavy Metals tB D 250ml ~ D HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D RN03 D
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth &-1 _7_y_,_g_1 __ ----I Sample Time 10 '-\5
Comment
~ See instruction
}\f-rhl.,a on i>it.:. ",1-Ob2:!>. -';'''ner lAf1tA G-... rr;r) pre.se,.-.-t--tor purer ClnJ .,sq~:~ eue1]-t. 'PlA'~e, ~~f) d\t DG30. ?v..("~e~ w-eH -+"0.-fA.. 1-ot",,1 o-f' 2S.!; yV\·,1'}",+eS-.
"""..-t-er "'-''''-.l. YI'1V\.-~. P ","~c... ",n.}.d .. " A. l."rvl? 1e Go lleG+-e..:\ •• J ICY 5.
L-ef\-s '.}.e 0.. t ) 0 L\2S.
MW-25 12-24-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
.~ /-~
r····· -... ---.... ---.---.---.--.. ---.. --... --.----..... ~ ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ~ See instruction ~~I).4~J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I De.c.LJ'V\b~r Mon~ 6'f"~\No..ier 2 0 1<-
Location (well name): L-I _M_V\l_-5b ___________ ---' Sampler N arne r-:::::o~. --:--_-,+-~-.~~----__.
and initials: I ;>l~f')(}~r-iJoJ1J~/111
Field Sample ill Jl\w-2b_ '2..2. Y201'2
Date and Time for Purging I 12~JICV,Z.fjl-(:, • and Sampling (if different) '--#_'/_A ________ --'
1'2-/2'1/20'L.-
Well Purging Equip Used: rn]pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I cpt11"mlAo4..S
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I JV\o'lRb &\0 Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1a.....-f.!_1 \_iJ~_!-_"=_S_5_·, _. _____ --'
MW-ll
pH Buffer 7.0 7,0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y.O
Specific Conductance 1a.....-_4....;' __ '1 ___ .... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I \'Li·33
Depth to Water Before Purging I 59. C L. 4" well:1 YD.b8 1(·653h)
3" Well: D (.367h) L--___ ---I
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) '--_3 .... "'\...;..7.;..D ______ .... pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 12:>. q I Redox Potential (Eh)1 3D, Turbidity .... 1 ...;;C)--'-__ -'
Weather Condo L-1_W_\"'_e ___________ .....
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( {prior sampling event}I ..... -_9_o __ --'
Time II :.Yi '-I I Gal. Purged ..... 1 _b ___ --' Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 3'170 pH b.7g Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) . L-I .... 3'-=0:;...71---_----' Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) o Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time Gal. Purged Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance pH Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged o gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 10.~ T=2V/Q= I D 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I AWl\L &~L
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs ~ D 3x40 ml D [9 HCL fjj D
Nutrients D D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 rr D
Heavy Metals G D 250 ml ~ D HN03 -r9 D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) m D Sample volume D ~ D ~
Ch lor;a( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ...... 1 ----:;1..;...\ O~. ~.-.;;S_---I Sample Time ..... 1 _)~_qs=-__ .....I
See instruction
Comment
~I-k. ... + 13'-10. ~Yl<.r ~611;J.p.~ ?~;,r +0 ailed--SA",,?),,:;,
c.o)kckJ ~+ )3l{5. ~17\.-i-e.(" vJ""~ L:.~e.o...(". Lr!..¥t-5.ft~ 01.+ l3~)
MW-2612-24-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
, "
" c1, ~
.~"
.. ~ -~
. ~C6ndu.c4'\uee (avg)
,.¥,iI~iteMe~aMjl.T '. '. " .
Field D.ata· Worksn,eet forG,:rs:undWa-ter"
Re.ijQxPot:,~~t~a~··~!~>:L·:'·· ••. ~,.~li:;;·~:,;:1
:.fX~j*.A~b~ !~~~. ~c~~~'o.r.~aRw1i:~~!f~tlt}0~',·~··~:: J
.... ·Ar .. .•.. • '··1 ·~lt6~"'·:.:.J ,
,-" j'
"l ,
Milt ~'&rol~ndwatei Dl~i:haige Permlt" ~f~Ui'Jdw~+¢.r M~nitorIh~"QQdfiti-M~r:~n~~ p.f;(Jn(qAih ' '
, " , •••• , .:.:, ," '" •• '. C_' <> _ .'.~ .". "~': _~_,. ~ '~:: . ",. ~ .,_.: '. "
Vo,11uIleof\\7ater Nrged ,r'.;hl'~;~~~" ,'1 . . 'g?I,lon(s}
PlUl1pm.~J"{:a~e 'C~l~t.ll~rtr.qll
, ; "]i10w R~tt~.b~);;¥~ !$PUt; , ... , , "",
"cS/60.~·C;;,~:~;;i 1.ll:~r>:" ".:"'["
Tirae to:evacu~(:e#JWbt:~sL ,~~@J~ftne$,(2V)
T ~ 2VJQ ;::; :i/j),S;~,l;:r7 .,,' ..
, .' .',~llfnb.el( Qf:¢a·$.mg Y9I~leS.cvaC\ja:tednfot~~~fw~1)riw9l '
,', ", ' .. ' .,' ": " ,.' <", • -~ ~ .',. ",' ' , 'r '..> ,:, '~.: " .
, :Hwell eva~~1~~xltp'4i:ynes~~ l1ul11~er .or gal1oH? eva~liated '
:Nrun:e \1ft;:ettill~d~lytidll La~()~a.io1yir()tlier Than El1ergy Labs
Preservative Added
VQL'S
If ptes~~ativ:e is ti:J:>ed, $}:ieciiy
, twe {llld Q,\:Hintityof I~t¢sel,'Vatiye:.
lliii# Deptlt Lj ':t~!i •...
~'
, 1i .
~6u1l1iel1t .. ,c, ... ........... .. ,. ............ "...... ......., .... .... . ., ......... ,
, "
. :.-~
, White.N.le$<i MUl
, ,Fleld'p.~ta..\!VQrk~heetf,~rGl;o~nrJIw~lter'
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
["-------·--------------·-·---1 ATTACHMENT 1-2
:
!, O.ENMISIN·.q.N.sl). ~~JI WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
• I: __ FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 D-<::"Ge.1Y\be.r Mon+h~ Grov.nJwife,r 2..£))2
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1-1 _P\_W_-_3>_\ ________ ----1
Sampler Name
and initials: 1::::ra..t1ne.r RoJ),jt?\~/lii
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 12/ j g /20 )2 and Sampling (if different) I/VIA
Well Purging Equip Used: LQ]pump or [Q] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [§]2 casings [Q]3 casings
Sampling Event I MO;:;:H\@Gw Prev.wellSampledinSamplingEVentlL-/V_/._"' _______ ----'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 W,D
Specific Conductance 1-1 _4 ;....;;Cf..:.,.q ___ ----'1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 11.3 0 .06
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 67. '3 5 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 YD. en 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) 1...--___ .....1
Conductance (avg) 2007 L--____________ ~ pH of Water (avg) 7.0C{ L--__ ~ __________ ~
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 13./4 Redox Potential (Eh)1 33-.5 Turbiditylr.......:::;o __ ----'
Time 1 13~S Gal. Purged I g 1 ,(?) 1
Conductance ::2-0 ,\ pH 7.0G{
Temp.oC 13.tL
Redox Potential Eh (m V)
Turbidity (NTU) o
Time I }?>Y7 Gal. Purged ~ I.SO
Conductance 'I '2..0 b<b pH 7.10
Temp.oC 1 \'3, T.$
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 3 ~S
Turbidity (NTU) I 0
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event}IL--_5_o_-"
Conductance 1 '2.004
Gal. Purged I <is) .. 51
pH 1 "to
Temp.oC I r:S.Z9 ]
Redox Potential Eh (m V) &...;1 3;;;;.;0;;;...5 __ ----1
Turbidity (NTU) o
Time IJ3yg Gal. Purged 1 a, 0<
Conductance 1 200 OS pH I 7.IO
Temp.oC 1 \3.7£
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-13_3_'4 __ ----'
Turbidity (NTU) o
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged g2.YZ: gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . 2..}""7
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1317,05 I
o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I AWA L ~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 i:J H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250m! D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 m! 0 D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ D ~
,DS
If preservative is used, specify
s~\-fO\+~ Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Gk \ Drlde.
Final Depth I j) ISO Sample Time I ......... ) 3J.,S-.D ____ --'
See instruction
Comment
A f'f' I \led, on s,i+e.. ",+ o,2f::" -r", VI" er GV1 c>. U-Mr i" pre.S, <:,,+ +0 r p\Ar~-e ""nJ. s "'rYf p} ;:::;
ever'\+' 'P~(~~ b5"'(\ 0\:\-' 0130 . f\A('tr~ wcJj -tor ~ 1-6+0.1 01 3gb 1'Y1;J')L1T~
\t.)a..t4!( ~a~ eJclAf"'" ~r()"'~6v..~ f\Al~-<' ?u;r~e:... e.Vlaea a..n~ St\Mple~ (.,6Ued~J.. Ot..+
r~SD, Le-?r-S \'t-v I\.f )~5b
MW-31 12-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Location (well name): L-I --L..N\-!.-W_-..:::3S~ ________ -J
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~Ymer Ron J~~
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 12.)1 g 1:2.01""2.. and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: IT[] pump or [g] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Q15D
Purging Method Used: [§J2 casings [g]3 casings
Sampling Event I fV\oY\ \\L", 6-W Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event lL--fo1_W_-_l Lf ______ ...J
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 I Y.D
Specific Conductance Il...-.....lq:.....;1....;.1 ___ ----I1 !lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 12..ti.50
Depth to Water Before Purging I 112...,10 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 g .09 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L--___ ...J
Conductance (avg) 92M L--~ ____________ ~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \ 3.30 Redox Potential (Eh)1 22$ TurbiditylL-0-=-__ --1
Weather Condo Over(J,..5> t Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)lL-_0_0 __ --I
Time Gal. Purged I lk . 2--? Time 1}93C 1 Gal. Purged 11£·4'1 1
Conductance pH Conductance 1 Y2g~ I pH 1 b.bO 1
Temp.oC Temp.oC 1 13,,30 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ?32 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 232 I
Turbidity (NTU) I b Turbidity (NTU) I D I
Time 1 ]93 J Gal. Purged )".70 Time I JL.J:)6 I Gal. Purged I Jb-:t2 I
Conductance l12q 0 pH Conductance I q2gg I pH I 6." 1
Temp.oC I r>\2~ Temp.oC I 1343D I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ?:2L Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 22-Y I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 Turbidity (NTU) I ~ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I 4 2..17
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 1 7Y,~ I
1 0
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs }tWA\: GEL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients D D 100ml D D H2SO4 D D
Heavy Metals lj D 250 ml ~ D HN03 ~ D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha 129 D 1,000 ml ~ D HN03 ~ D
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 113.03 Sample Time 1-..1 _Jl1_9_o ___ --'
Comment
~ See instruction
A(('/'0eA on SI1-<:: o..-r 1315. -r;."ner ~nJ f:r-o..(r l'", pres.e",r--:Por j>"'\f"je tV1tA .s.(I'VJ.p}.,~ -e \l~rr+ _
Pv.r~~ b<!!jfA.t'l CAt-)~Z.o. f\A.r~('j We}[..{;,-fA +O+CA./ of' go M;l}lAt~. l,Uo...+<::r Wa.s c.)~r ..
'PV-1ef-er1~G~ M~ f.1AY"lpks .col\ec.-t-<:A ~+ )YLfO. L..cfi S;-}-L "i-14Lf5.
MW-35 12-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit
GroundwaterMonitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
! .............. _ ............................ j ATTACHMENT 1-2
.. ,!I o ... ,E NM .. IISN~NS. ~~ ~. I WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL I:!il See instruction
'-II: FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I D <;'L.~kec M()~ \ 'vI r;, 6( )~Wt& t u 2-0' 2. I Sampler Name
Location (well name): I ;V\ W--2>--0-tS and initials: I G<c=f'f-'jAy fw\M,V I Ue
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 1 ~ I 2,6 I 20 ~ 2.. and Sampling (if different) N/A
Well Purging Equip Used: [IDpump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 00 2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I jV\" "" t-i,." ~ V & LJ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I /1\ W -26 ,
pH Buffer 7.0 7,,0 pH Buffer 4.0 1.-1 .. 0
Specific Conductance I q q l4 I ~MHos/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft):
Depth to Water Before Purging I 7l{.,:3 5
Conductance (avg) 20&7
Well Water Temp. (avg) } 3. gq I
Time ' I 1101
Conductance
Temp.oC
Gal. Purged
201~1 pH
) J. [] I
Redox ,Potential Eh (mV)
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 110.:3 Gal. Purged
Conductance I 2o!tj I pH
Temp.oC 13-q3 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~3/
Turbidity (NTU) I 0
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 2 ::L{i2J(.653h)
3" Well:L-. __ Q~_J--I (.367h)
pH of Water (avg) 6.96
Redox Potential (Eh)1 "3 1.>} 0 I Turbidity I 0
t..j6 ~Q.
{?c'16
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 -' 6 tJ
Time ]' o~
Conductance
Temp.oC
Gal. Purged
207Ql
13.8'K I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I '3 t..LS
Turbidity (NTU)
Time }lOY Gal. Purged
Conductance 1 ~aK.1 1 pH I
Temp.oC 13,Q I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I .32.~
Turbidity (NTU) 0
~t t,j 31
6 .. Q/'( 1
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I 9' 2, 1 7
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 20!j{Y71
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 DS H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 fBI 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) J2l 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
L k ~Of'"l vle If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
MW-65 12-26-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabD
Quarterly Depth to Water
NAME: Garrin Palmer
DATE: 12/28/2012
TIME WELL Static level TIME WELL Static Level TIME WELL Static Level TIME WELL Static Level
824 MW-l 64.15 1251 MW-4 73.02 1341 PIEZ-l 61.55 NA DR-l ABANDON
706 MW-2 109.75 1256 TW4-1 64.99 13.43 PIEZ-2 20.20 NA DR-2 ABANDON
701 MW-3 83.06 1249 TW4-2 66.90 1346 PIEZ-3 40.31
701 MW-3A 85.04 1245 TW4-3 50.29 1438 PIEZ-4 46.85
719 MW-5 106.27 1302 TW4-4 69.98 1441 PIEZ-5 41.95 910 DR-5 82.9
717 MW-ll 87.54 1240 TW4-5 56.81 916 DR-6 94.4
721 MW-12 108.50 1307 TW4-6 70.04 1207 TWN-l 51.47 1500 DR-7 92
740 MW-14 103.52 1253 TW4-7 67.92 1210 TWN-2 20.93 925 DR-8 50.96
736 MW-15 106.35 1259 TW4-8 66.54 1214 TWN-3 32.76 922 DR-9 86.31
1445 MW-17 73.60 1243 TW4-9 54.75 1218 TWN-4 41.01 919 DR-l0 78.12
827 MW-18 70.12 1236 TW4-1O 56.37 838 TWN-5 69.28 1454 DR-ll 98.25
746 MW-19 55.01 1330 TW4-11 57.85 820 TWN-6 75.27 1451 DR-12 89.12
650 MW-20 89.95 1320 TW4-12 47.13 840 TWN-7 87.76 1448 DR-13 69.65
645 MW-22 66.71 1322 TW4-13 47.15 831 TWN-8 62.30 931 DR-14 76.27
723 MW-23 115.39 1325 TW4-14 86.89 752 TWN-9 62.21 959 DR-iS 92.8
641 MW-24 114.18 1233 TW4-15 68.15 817 TWN-lO 80.70 NA DR-16 ABANDON
714 MW-25 73.19 1333 TW4-16 60.25 811 TWN-ll 69.25 934 DR-17 64.75
654 MW-26 59.93 1336 TW4-17 74.95 806 TWN-12 27.72 NA DR-18 ABANDON
705 MW-27 51.46 1201 TW4-18 56.63 755 TWN-13 45.61 937 DR-19 63.05
639 MW-28 76.28 1400 TW4-19 63.18 758 TWN-14 62.20 946 DR-20 55.35
708 MW-29 101.82 1231 TW4-20 56.95 814 TWN-15 91.74 1002 DR-21 107.35
710 MW-30 75.51 1204 TW4-21 54.10 803 TWN-16 47.60 939 DR-22 DRY
712 MW-31 67.49 1228 TW4-22 53.41 801 TWN-17 33.47 951 DR-23 70.46
658 MW-32 74.95 1310 TW4-23 64.76 836 TWN-18 57.95 942 DR-24 43.54
728 MW-33 DRY 1225 TW4-24 54.78 858 TWN-19 52.50 NA DR-25 ABANDON
731 MW-34 107.95 1157 TW4-25 47.50
725 MW-35 112.36 1314 TW4-26 63.48
727 MW-36 110.51 1328 TW4-27 83.08
734 MW-37 110.17
TabE
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Quarterly Sampling
Cation -Anion Balance and
TDS Ratio
:tQS Sa la nee 0.94
46.4
40.5
6.68
2960
2772
1.07
75.8
55.1
15.82
5410
4010
1.35
33.8 41.7
66.3 35.1 30.1
11.77 -1.94 16.25
5610 2040 2050
4654 2229 1983
1.21 0.92 1.03
Cation -Anion Balance and
TDS Ratio
Cation -Anion Balance and
TDS Ratio
Cation -Anion Balance and
TOS Ratio
Cation -Anion Balance and
TDS Ratio
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-001
Client Sample ID: MW-01_11272012
Collection Date: 11127/2012 0950h
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 12/3/2012 l315h 12/3/2012 1910h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mgIL 12/312012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 12/312012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 12/412012 0927h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mgIL 12110/2012 1800h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 12/412012 1846h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mgIL 12/412012 0905h E300.0 100
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11130/2012 1420h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
0.154
240
< 1.00
18.5
0.297
< 0.100
846
1,340
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 7 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useoft~e name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ~ith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale of any product or pro.cess, orin connection with the re.-publication oft?isreport for any
American West
ANA LYTIC AL LABORATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-01_11272012
Collection Date: 11127/2012 0950h
Received Date: 11/30/2012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/3/20120942h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 52.2 50.00 104
1868-53-7 50.6 50.00 101
460-00-4 55.2 50.00 110
17060-07-0 51.5 50.00 103
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
21.8
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 12112/2012 Page 20 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCO This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useoft~e name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or pro~ess, orin connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 7,2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-01 11272012 Proiect: DNMI00100
Lab Sample ID: 315987001 Client ID: DNMI001
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315987
Collect Date: 27-NOV-12 09:50
Receive Date: 30-NOV-12
Collector: Client
larameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
~ercury Analysis-CV AA
PA 245 Mercury "As Received"
vIercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYV1 12/07112 08:56 1268494 1
~etals Analysis-ICP
WOo 7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
:alcium 174000 500 500 ug/L 1 LS 12/20/12 11 :55 1267256 2
:hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 1
:obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron 384 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
vIagnesium 63300 500 500 ug/L 1
vIanganese 315 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
vIolybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
~ickel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
>otassium 6850 500 500 ug/L 1
;odium 178000 500 500 ug/L 1
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 1
~inc U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
lin U ND 100 100 ug/L 10 LS 12/20112 15:30 1267256 4
~etals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L PRB 12114112 19:59 1267296 5
;elenium U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L
\rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L SKJ 12/20/12 19:56 1271880 6
:admium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
.-ead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
[,hallium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium U ND 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01 /03113 05:03 1272960 7
:opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01104/13 11 :55 1272960 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/03/12 0730 1267295
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28/12 1130 1272959
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP MTM1 12/20112 1100 1271878
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 12/03/12 0730 1267254
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: February 7,2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-01 11272012
315987001
Ground Water
27-NOV-12 09:50
30-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
~ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
]FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
:Jross Radium Alpha 1.52 +/-0.350
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
V1ethod Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
;uITogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.626
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
l.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pC ilL KDF1 12/08112 1258 1267600
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
103 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
American West ANALYTI CA L LABO RATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-002
Client Sample ID: MW-02_11272012
Collection Date: 11127/2012 0855h
Received Date: 11/30/2012 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 12/312012 l315h 12/3/2012 1914h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 12/3/2012 1106h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 12/3/2012 1106h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 12110/2012 1822h . E300.0 1.00
Fluoride mg/L 12110/2012 1822h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 12/412012 1848h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 12/412012 1226h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 1113012012 1420h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
310
< 1.00
7.24
0.262
< 0.100
1,640
2,960
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 8 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in c?nuection with the adverti~ement, promotion or sale of any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication of t~is report for any
American West ANALYTICAL LA80RATOR I ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-002A
Client Sample ID: MW-02_11272012
Collection Date: 1112712012 0855h
Received Date: 11/3012012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/312012 1001h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dich1oroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 51.6 50.00 103
1868-53-7 50.2 50.00 100
460-00-4 54.1 50.00 108
17060-07-0 52.0 50.00 104
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 21 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useoft~e name of this comiJany or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, promotion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, orin connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 7, 2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-02 11272012 Proiect: DNMI00100
Lab Sample ID: 315987002 Client ID: DNMI001
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315987
Collect Date: 27-NOV-12 08:55
Receive Date: 30-NOV-12
Collector: Client
>arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
PA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
vlercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYVI 12/07112 08:58 1268494 1
Vletals Analysis-ICP
WO.7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
:alcium 330000 500 500 ug/L 1 LS 12/20112 12:12 12672562
:hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 1
:obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron U ND 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
vlagnesium 92400 500 500 ug/L 1
vlanganese U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
vlolybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
~ickel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 1
~inc U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
>otassium 10500 500 500 ug/L 10 LS 12/20112 15:42 1267256 4
;odium 506000 1000 500 ug/L 10
lin U ND 100 100 ug/L 10
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L PRB 12/14112 20:23 1267296 5
;elenium 15.5 5.00 5.00 ug/L
lisenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L SKJ 12/20112 19:34 1271880 6
:admium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
..,ead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
lhallium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 13.9 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01/03113 05:24 1272960 7
:opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01/04113 13:03 1272960 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267295
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28112 1130 1272959
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP MTMI 12/20112 1100 1271878
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267254
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: February 7,2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-02 11272012
Sample ID: 315987002
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
27-NOV-12 08:55
30-NOV-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
~ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
JFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
]ross Radium Alpha 1.46 +/-0.323
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Vlethod Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
;unogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.544
3arium Carrier OFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDFI 12/08/12 1301 1267600
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
102 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-003
Client Sample ID: MW-03_11282012
Collection Date: 11128/2012 1325h
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 12/3/2012 1315h 12/312012 1915h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 12/3/2012 1106h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 12/4/2012 1355h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mg/L 1211012012 1929h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 12/412012 1849h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 12/412012 1310h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11/30/2012 1420h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
212
< 1.00
74.8
1.26
0.419
2,340
5,410
Report Date: 12/12/2012 . Page 9 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale of any product or pro~ess, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTI CAL LAB ORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-003A
Client Sample ID: MW-03_11282012
Collection Date: 11 /28/2012 1325h
Received Date: 11 /30/2012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/3/2012 1020h
Units: J-lg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 51.1 50.00 102
1868-53-7 49.9 50.00 99.8
460~00-4 52.9 50.00 106
17060-07-0 52.1 50.00 104
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Quaf
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 12112/2012 Page 22 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection \\lith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 7,2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-03 11282012 Proiect: DNMIOOI00
Lab Sample ID: 315987003 Client ID: DNMIOOI
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315987
Collect Date: 28-NOV-12 l3:25
Recei ve Date: 30-NOV-12
Collector: Client
)arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
PA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
vlercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYVI 12107112 09:00 1268494 1
Vletals Analysis-ICP
WOo 7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
:alcium 445000 500 500 ug/L 1 LS 12/20112 12:15 1267256 2
:hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 1
:obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron U ND 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
vlagnesium 245000 500 500 ug/L 1
vlanganese 89.1 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
vlolybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
~ickel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
rin U ND 100 100 ug/L 1
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 1
~inc 46.1 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
>otassium 24000 500 500 ug/L 10 LS 12/20/12 15:45 1267256 4
;odium 754000 1000 500 ug/L 10
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L PRB 12/14112 20:30 1267296 5
;elenium 58.9 5.00 5.00 ug/L
\rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L SKJ 12/20112 19:29 1271880 6
:admium 0.954 0.500 0.500 ug/L
... ead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
[,hallium 1.16 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 23.3 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01/03113 05:27 1272960 7
:opper 10.8 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01104/13 13:05 1272960 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/03/12 0730 1267295
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28/12 1130 1272959
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP MTMI 12/20/12 1100 1271878
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267254
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: February 7,2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-03 11282012
315987003
Ground Water
28-NOV-1213:25
30-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
~ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
:JFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
:Jross Radium Alpha U 1.00 +/-0.186
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.612
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Result
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDFI 12/08/12 1258 1267600
Analyst Comments
Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
98.5 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
American West ANAl.VTlCAl LABORATOR I ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-004
Client Sample ID: MW-03A_11292012
Collection Date: 11129/2012 0750h
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Ammonia (as N) mglL 12/3/2012 1315h 12/3/2012 1916h E350.1 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mglL 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00 325
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mglL 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Chloride mglL 12/4/2012 1502h E300.0 10.0 67.1
Fluoride mglL 12/10/2012 1951h E300.0 0.100 0.988
NitratelNitrite (as N) mglL 12/4/2012 1850h E353.2 0.100 1.31
Sulfate mgIL 12/4/2012 1417h E300.0 1,000 2,780
Total Dissolved Solids mglL 11130/2012 1420h SM2540C 20.0 5,610
Report Date: 12112/2012 Page 10 of42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use ofthe addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this comp'any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, promotion or sale of any product or pro~ess, orin connection with the re.-publication oft)1isreport for any
American West
ANALYTICAl, LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-004A
Client Sample ID: MW-03A_11292012
Collection Date: 11129/2012 0750h
Received Date: 11/30/2012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/312012 1039h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 51.3 50.00 103
1868-53-7 49.8 50.00 99.5
17060-07-0 51.5 50.00 103
460-00-4 54.2 50.00 108
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
72-151
80-128
Report Date: 12/1212012 Page 23 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of t~e name of this company or any. member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection ~ith the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this. report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
)arameter
~ercury Analysis-CV AA
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-03A 11292012
Lab Sample ID: 315987004
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 29-NOV-12 07:50
Receive Date: 30-NOV-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
"PA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
viercury U ND
~etals Analysis-ICP
WO.7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
=alcium 469000
=hromium U ND
=obalt U ND
ron U ND
viagnesium 295000
vianganese 23 .0
violybdenum U ND
~ickel U ND
lin U ND
lanadium U ND
~inc 38.9
>otassium 28100
;odium 818000
~etals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
3eryllium 0.668
;elenium 111
lisenic U ND
=admium 1.22
~ead U ND
lhallium 0.727
Jranium 22.4
;ilver U ND
=opper 13.8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
Description
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
SRL CRDL Units
0.500 0.500 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
25.0 25.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
30.0 30.0 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
20.0 20.0 ug/L
100 100 ug/L
15.0 15.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
1000 500 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
5.00 5.00 ug/L
5.00 5.00 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
1.00 1.00 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
0.300 0.300 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
Analyst Date
AXG2 12/03112
AXG2 12/28112
MTMI 12/20/12
AXG2 12/03/12
Report Date: February 7,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
315987
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1 BYVI 12/07/12 09:02 1268494 1
1 LS 12/20112 12:18 1267256 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10 LS 12/20112 15:48 1267256 4
10
PRB 12114112 20:36 1267296 5
SKJ 12/20/12 19:16 1271880 6
SKJ 01/03113 05:31 1272960 7
SKJ 01/04113 13:07 1272960 8
Time Prep Batch
0730 1267295
1130 1272959
1100 1271878
0730 1267254
GEL LABORATORIESLLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: February 7,2013
Company:
Address:
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-03A 11292012
315987004
Ground Water
29-NOV-12 07:50
30-NOV-12
Client
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty DL RL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
--~----------------------------------~----------------------
~ad Gas, Flow Proportional Counting
]FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
:Jross Radium Alpha U 1.00 ' +/-0.269 0.562 1.00 pCi/L KDF1 12/08112 1258 1267600
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description Analyst Comments
EPA 900.1 Modified
;uITogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 99.4 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-005
Client Sample ID: MW-05_11272012
Collection Date: 11/27/2012 1545h
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 12/3/2012 1315h 12/3/2012 1921h E350.1 0.0500 0.560
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00 315
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Chloride mg/L 12/4/2012 1733h E300.0 10.0 61.2
Fluoride mg/L 12/10/2012 2013h E300.0 0.100 0.737
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 12/4/2012 1852h E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 12/4/2012 1546h E300.0 100 1,300
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11130/2012 1420h SM2540C 20.0 2,040
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 11 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. connection ,,:,ith the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~is report for any
American West ANALYTICAL L/.BOflATOR fE S
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-005A
Client Sample ID: MW-05_11272012
Collection Date: 11127/2012 1545h
Received Date: 11/30/2012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/3/2012 1155h
Units: ~g/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride .
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 52.3 50.00 105
1868-53-7 51.3 50.00 103
17060-07-0 52.8 50.00 106
460-00-4 54.6 50.00 109
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
6.22
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
72-151
80-128
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 24 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useoft~e name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection \\lith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of t?is report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 7, 2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-05 11272012 Proiect: DNMI00100
Lab Sample ID: 315987005 Client ID: DNMI001
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315987
Collect Date: 27-NOV-12 15:45
Receive Date: 30-NOV-12
Collector: Client
)arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
PA 245 Mercury "As Received"
vIercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L I BYVI 12/07/12 09 :03 1268494 I
Vletals Analysis-ICP
~OO. 71200.2 TAL ''As Received"
~alcium 141000 500 500 ug/L 1 LS 12120112 12:21 1267256 2
~hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 1
~obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron 35.7 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
vIagnesium 39800 500 500 ug/L 1
vIanganese 222 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
vIolybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
'Tickel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
>otassium 7960 500 500 ug/L 1
;odium 490000 500 500 ug/L 1
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 1
~inc U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
rin U ND 100 100 ug/L 10 LS 12120112 15:51 12672564
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
~00.81200.2 TAL ''As Received"
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L PRB 12114112 20:42 1267296 5
;elenium U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L
lisenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L SKI 12/20112 19: 11 1271880 6
~admium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
~ead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
[,hallium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 0.402 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKI 01/03/13 05:34 1272960 7
~opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKI 01104/13 13:09 1272960 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267295
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12128112 1130 1272959
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP MTMI 12120/12 1100 1271878
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 12/03/12 0730 1267254
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: February 7, 2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-05 11272012
315987005
Ground Water
27-NOV-12 15:45
30-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
~ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
:JFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Jross Radium Alpha 1.01 +1-0.300
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.704
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDF1 12/08112 1258 1267600
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
103 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
American West ANA LYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-001
Client Sample ID: MW-11_11122012
Collection Date: 11112/2012 1330h
Received Date: 1111612012 0940h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 1112012012 1023h 11120/2012 1810h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 11/1912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 11119/2012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 11126/2012 1229h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mg/L 1112112012 1417h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 1111612012 1649h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 1112112012 0422h E300.0 100
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 1111612012 1240h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
0.690
305
< 1.00
30.0
0.471
<0.100
1,110
2,050
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 7 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this comp'any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in, c?nnection v:ith the adverti~ement, pro,motion or sale ,of any product or process, or in connection with the re,-publication oft)1is report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATOR IES
463 West 3600 South
';alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-11_11122012
Collection Date: 11112/2012 1330h
Received Date: 11116/2012 0940h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 11/16/20121316h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 49.2 50.00 98.5
1868-53-7 49.6 50.00 99.1
460-00-4 50.3 50.00 101
17060-07-0 51.2 50.00 102
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 17 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ",:,ith the adverti~ement, pro,motion or sale .of any product or pro~ess, orin connection with the re,-publication of this report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 5, 2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-ll 11122012 Proiect: DNMIOOI00
Lab Sample ID: 315400001 Client ID: DNMIOOI
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315400
Collect Date: 12-NOV-12 13:00
Receive Date: 16-NOV-12
Collector: Client
)arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
~ercury Analysis-CV AA
?FA 245 Mercury "As Received"
viercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYVI 12/03/12 10:54 1267206 1
~etals Analysis-ICP
WOo 7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
:a1cium 69300 500 500 ug/L 1 LS 12106/12 11 :40 1264523 2
:hromium U ND 25 .0 25.0 ug/L 1
:obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron 220 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
viagnesium 21400 500 500 ug/L 1
vianganese 138 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
violybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
IEckel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 1
~inc U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
rin U ND 100 100 ug/L 10 LS 12/06/12 13:52 1264523 4
>otassium 6970 500 500 ug/L 10 JWJ 12/06/12 20:47 1264523 5
;odium 562000 1000 500 ug/L 10
~etals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/2 00.2 TAL ''As Received"
\rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L RMJ 11123/12 16:10 12645206
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
:admium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
;elenium U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L
rhallium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 0.786 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01103/13 22:00 1272955 7
:opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01104/13 16:45 1272955 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 11120/12 0630 1264518
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28/12 1130 1272954
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 11120/12 0630 1264522
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep MTMI 12/06/12 1330 1268683
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 30, 2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-11 11122012
Sample ID: 315400001
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
12-NOV-1213:00
16-NOV-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha U 1.00 +/-0.222
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.596
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDF1 11125/12 1622 1264639
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
103 (25%-125%)
American West
ANA LYTlCAL LA.90RATOtl IES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, Dr 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-006
Client Sample ID: MW-12_11272012
Collection Date: 11127/2012 1140h
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mglL 12/3/2012 l315h 12/3/2012 1922h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mglL 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mglL 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mglL 12/4/2012 1840h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mglL 12/10/2012 2035h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mglL 12/412012 1853h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mglL 12/412012 1755h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mglL 11130/2012 1420h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
351
< 1.00
71.7
0.234
0.152
1,770
4,010
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 12 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useofthe name ofthis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection v-:ith the advertisement, promotion or sale .ofany product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication oft)1is report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-006A
Client Sample ID: MW-12_11272012
Collection Date: 11127/2012 1140h
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 12/3/2012 1214h
Units: !J.g/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Sufi: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 51.5 50.00 103
1868-53-7 49.8 50.00 99.6
460-00-4 54.6 50.00 109
17060-07-0 51.8 50.00 104
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
2.74
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 25 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ~ith the adverti~ement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication oft)1isreport for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 7,2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-12 11272012 Proiect: DNMI00100
Lab Sample ID: 315987006 Client ID: DNMI001
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315987
Collect Date: 27-NOV-1211:40
Receive Date: 30-NOV-12
Collector: Client
larameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
~ercury Analysis-CV AA
PA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
viercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYVI 12/07/12 09:05 1268494 1
~etals Analysis-ICP
WOo 7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
~hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 1 LS 12120/12 12:24 1267256 2
~obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron U ND 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
viagnesium 224000 500 500 ug/L 1
vianganese 52.0 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
violybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
~ickel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
;odium 344000 500 500 ug/L 1
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 1
~inc U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
~alcium 535000 1000 500 ug/L 20 LS 12120112 16:47 1267256 4
>otassium 15600 1000 500 ug/L 20
lin U ND 100 100 ug/L 20
~etals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L PRB 12119/12 14:12 1267296 5
;elenium 23.0 5.00 5.00 ug/L
\rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L SKJ 12120/12 19:07 1271880 6
~admium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
..,ead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
lhallium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 21.5 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01103/13 05 :38 1272960 7
~opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01104/13 13:16 1272960 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267295
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28112 1130 1272959
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP MTMI 12/20112 1100 1271878
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267254
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: February 7,2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-12 11272012
Sample ID: 315987006
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
27-NOV-1211:40
30-NOV-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
~ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
]FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U 1.00 +/-0.144
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
VIethod Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.478
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Result
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDF1 12/08/12 1258 1267600
Analyst Comments
Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
98.8 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL. .
American West ANAl YTICA L L ABORATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-007
Client Sample ID: MW-14_11272012
Collection Date: 11127/2012 1335h
Received Date: 11/30/2012 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 12/312012 1315h 12/312012 1926h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 12/3/2012 1106h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 12/312012 1106h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 12/412012 1947h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mg/L 12110/2012 2058h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 12/4/2012 1903h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 12/412012 1902h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11130/2012 1420h SM2540C 20.0
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
386
< 1.00
21.8
0.158
< 0.100
1,700
3,600
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 13 of 42
All analyses applicable to. the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfo.nned in acco.rdance to. NELAC protoco.ls. Pertinent sampling info.nnatio.n is lo.cated o.n the attached COCo This repo.rt is pro.vided fo.r the exclusive use o.fthe addressee. Privileges o.f
subsequent use o.fthe name o.f this co.mpany o.r any member o.fits staff; o.r repro.ductio.n o.f this repo.rt in. c?nnectio.n with the advertisement, pro..mo.tio.n o.r sale .o.f any product o.r process, o.r in co.nnectio.n with the re.-publicatio.n o.f this repo.rt fo.r any
American West ANA LYTI CAL I.ABORATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
LaboratOlY Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-007 A
Client Sample ID: MW-14_11272012
Collection Date: 11/27/2012 1335h
Received Date: 11/30/2012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/3/2012 1234h
Units: J.lg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 51.0 50.00 102
1868-53-7 49.7 50.00 99.4
460-00-4 53.5 50.00 107
17060-07-0 52.2 50.00 104
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80'-128
72-151
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 26 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC, This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee, Privileges of
subsequent use, of t~e name of this company or any, member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in, c?nnection v:ith the adverti~ement, pro,motion or sale ,of any product or pro,cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 7,2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-14 11272012 Proiect: DNMIOOI00
Lab Sample ID: 315987007 Client ID: DNMIOOI
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315987
Collect Date: 27-NOV-12 13:35
Receive Date: 30-NOV-12
Collector: Client
)arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
PA 245 Mercury "As Received"
vlercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYVI 12/07112 09:06 1268494 1
Vletals Analysis-ICP
WOo 71200.2 TAL ''As Received"
~hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 1 LS 12/20112 12:27 1267256 2
~obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron U ND 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
vlagnesium 149000 500 500 ug/L 1
vlanganese 2100 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
vlolybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
~ickel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
;odium 363000 500 500 ug/L 1
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 1
~inc 15.0 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
~alcium 509000 1000 500 ug/L 20 LS 12120112 16:50 1267256 4
>otassium 14500 1000 500 ug/L 20
rin U ND 100 100 ug/L 20
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
~00.81200.2 TAL ''As Received"
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L PRB 12119112 14: 16 1267296 5
;elenium U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L
\rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L SKJ 12120112 18:53 1271880 6
~admium 1.30 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
rhallium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 63.8 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01103113 05:49 1272960 7
~opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01104113 13:19 1272960 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267295
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12128112 1130 1272959
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP MTMI 12/20112 1100 1271878
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267254
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: February 7, 2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-14 11272012
Sample ID: 315987007
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
27-NOV-1213:35
30-NOV-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
tad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
::JFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
:Jross Radium Alpha 1.14 +/-0.306
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Y1ethod Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
;uITogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.606
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Result
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDF1 12/08112 1258 1267600
Analyst Comments
Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
98.5 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
American West
ANALYTICA L LAB ORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-002
Client Sample ID: MW-15 _11142012
Collection Date: 11114/2012 1235h
Received Date: 11/16/2012 0940h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mgIL 11120/2012 1023h 11120/2012 1813h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mgIL 1111912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 1111912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 1112612012 1416h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mg/L 1112112012 1438h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 1111612012 1651h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 1112612012 1333h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 1111612012 1240h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
355
< 1.00
39.4
0.250
0.168
1,330
3,810
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 8 of37
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in 'accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useoft~e name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-002A
Client Sample ID: MW-15_11142012
Collection Date: 11114/2012 1235h
Received Date: 11116/2012 0940h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 11116/2012 1335h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromotluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromotluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 ' 49.8 50.00 99.7
1868-53-7 49.9 50.00 99.8
460-00-4 51.6 50.00 103
17060-07-0 51.7 50.00 103
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 18 of37
All analyses applicable to. the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfDnned in accDrdance to. NELAC prDtDcDls, Pertinent sampling infDnnation is IDeated Dn the attached CDC. This repDrt is prDvided for the exclusive use Dfthe addressee. Privileges Df
subsequent use. Dft~e name Dfthis cDmpany Dr any member Dfits staff, Dr reprDductiDn of this report in c?nnectiDn with the advertisement, pro.motiDn Dr sale .Df any product or process, orin connection with the re-publication Dfthisreport fDr any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
}arameter
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-15 11142012
Lab Sample ID: 315400002
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 14-NOV-12 12:35
Receive Date: 16-NOV-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
?P A 245 Mercury ''As Received"
v1ercury U . ND
Vletals Analysis-ICP
!OO. 7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
~alcium 447000
~hromium U ND
~obalt U ND
ron U ND
v1agnesium 168000
v1anganese U ND
v10lybdenum U ND
..rickel U ND
['in U ND
lanadium U ND
~inc U ND
>otassium 10000
;odium 490000
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
!00.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
\rsenic U ND
3eryllium U ND
~admium U ND
.Jead U ND
;elenium 117
[,hallium U ND
Jranium 41.9
;ilver U ND
~opper 10.8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
Description
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
SRL CRDL
0.500 0.500
500 500
25.0 25.0
10.0 10.0
30.0 30.0
500 500
10.0 10.0
10.0 10.0
20.0 20.0
100 100
15.0 15.0
10.0 10.0
500 500
500 500
5.00 5.00
0.500 0.500
0.500 0.500
1.00 1.00
5.00 5.00
0.500 0.500
0.300 0.300
10.0 10.0
10.0 10.0
Analyst
AXG2
AXG2
AXG2
MTMI
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: February 5, 2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
315400
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
ug/L 1 BYVI 12/03112 11 :00 1267206 1
ug/L LS 12106112 11 :59 1264523 2
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L JWJ 12/06112 21:04 1264523 5
ug/L
ug/L RMJ 11/23112 16:35 1264520 6
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L SKJ 01103/13 22:25 1272955 7
ug/L SKJ 01104/13 16:59 1272955 8
Date Time Prep Batch
11120112 0630 1264518
12/28112 1130 1272954
11/20112 0630 1264522
12/06112 1330 1268683
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 30,2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-15 11142012
Sample ID: 315400002
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
14-NOV-12 12:35
16-NOV-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha U 1.00 +/-0.141
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.475
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDFl 11125/12 1622 1264639
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
100 (25%-125%)
American West
ANALYTIC Al. LABORATO RIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-008
Client Sample ID: MW-17 _11282012
Collection Date: 11128/2012 1045h
Received Date: ·11130/2012 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 12/3/2012 1315h 12/3/2012 1930h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 12/3/2012 1106h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 12/4/2012 2054h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mg/L 12110/2012 2120h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 12/4/2012 1905h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 12/10/2012 1546h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11130/2012 1420h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
372
< 1.00
38.7
0.197
1.44
1,570
3,620
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 14 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any. member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. connection ",:ith the adverti~ement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~is report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-008A
Client Sample ID: MW-17 _11282012
Collection Date: 11128/2012 1045h
Received Date: 1113012012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/312012 1253h
Units: J-lg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 51.8 50.00 104
1868-53-7 51.1 50.00 102
460-00-4 53.9 50.00 108
17060-07-0 53.0 50.00 106
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 27 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of t~e name of this comJlany or any. member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection \\lith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~is report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 7, 2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-17 11282012 Proiect: DNMI00100
Lab Sample ID: 315987008 Client ID: DNMI001
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315987
Collect Date: 28-NOV-12 10:45
Receive Date: 30-NOV-12
Collector: Client
)arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
vlercury Analysis-CV AA
<':PA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
\1:ercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYV1 12/07/12 09:08 1268494 1
vIetals Analysis-ICP
~OO. 71200.2 TAL ''As Received"
:alcium 327000 500 500 ug/L 1 LS 12/20112 12:30 1267256 2
:hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 1
:obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron U ND 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
\1:agnesium 156000 500 500 ug/L 1
\1:anganese 74.5 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
\1:o1ybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
'hckel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
['in U ND 100 100 ug/L 1
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 1
~inc U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
>otassium 11600 500 500 ug/L 10 LS 12/20112 16:05 1267256 4
;odium 524000 1000 500 ug/L 10
vIetals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 PRB 12/19/12 14:21 1267296 5
;elenium 17.3 5.00 5.00 ug/L 1
\rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L 1 SKJ 12/20112 18:49 1271880 6
:admium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1
..,ead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L 1
[,hallium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1
Jranium 23.5 0.300 0.300 ug/L 1
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1 SKJ 01 /03/13 05:52 1272960 7
:opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1 SKJ 01 /04/13 13:21 1272960 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267295
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28112 1130 1272959
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP MTM1 12/20112 1100 1271878
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 12/03/12 0730 1267254
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: February 7, 2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-17 11282012
315987008
Ground Water
28-NOV-1210:45
30-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
~ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
]FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U 1.00 ' +/-0.284
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
;uITogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.594
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlOO
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDFI 12/08/12 1258 1267600
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
99.1 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
American West ANA LYTICAL LABORATO RIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-009
Client Sample ID: MW-18_11262012
Collection Date: 11126/2012 1350h
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 12/3/2012 1315h 12/3/2012 1931h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 12/3/2012 1106h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 12/4/2012 2330h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mg/L 12110/2012 2227h -E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 12/4/2012 1906h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 12/4/2012 2245h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11130/2012 1420h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
393
< 1.00
54.0
0.170
< 0.100
1,210
3,160
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 15 of 42
All analyses applicable to. the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfo.nned in acco.rdance to. NELAC proto.Co.ls. Pertinent sampling info.nnat.io.n is lo.cated o.n the attached COe. This repo.rt is provided fo.r the exclusive use o.fthe addressee. Privileges o.f
subsequent useofthe name o.fthis company o.r any member o.fits staff: o.r repro.ductio.n o.fthis repo.rt in. co.nnectio.n ~ith the advertisement, promo.tio.n o.r sale .o.fany pro.duct o.r process, o.rin co.nnectio.n with the re.-publicatio.n o.ft~is repo.rt fo.r any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-009A
Client Sample ID: MW-18_11262012
Collection Date: 11126/2012 1350h
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/3/20121312h
Units: /lg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: 1 Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 51.6 50.00 103
1868-53-7 50.4 50.00 101
460-00-4 53.6 50.00 107
17060-07-0 52.7 50.00 105
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 28 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ~ith the advertisement, promotion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~isreport for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 7, 2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-18 11262012 Proiect: DNMI00100
Lab Sample ID: 315987009 Client ID: DNMI001
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315987
Collect Date: 26-NOV-12 13:50
Receive Date: 30-NOV-12
Collector: Client
}arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
PA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
v1ercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYVI 12/07112 09:13 1268494 1
Vletals Analysis-ICP
~OO. 71200.2 TAL ''As Received"
~hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 1 LS 12120112 12:33 1267256 2
~obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron 80.9 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
v1agnesium 131000 500 500 ug/L 1
v1anganese 77.6 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
v10lybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
-.Iickel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
;odium 193000 500 500 ug/L 1
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 1
~inc U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
~alcium 574000 1000 500 ug/L 20 LS 12120/12 16:08 1267256 4
>otassium 11700 1000 500 ug/L 20
rin U ND 100 100 ug/L 20
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
~00.81200.2 TAL ''As Received"
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L PRB 12119/12 14:34 1267296 5
;elenium U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L
\rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L SKJ 12120112 18:44 1271880 6
~admium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
rhallium 3.20 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 43.9 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01103/13 05:56 1272960 7
~opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01104/13 13:23 1272960 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267295
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12128112 1130 1272959
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP MTMI 12120112 1100 1271878
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267254
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556~8171 -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: February 7, 2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-18 11262012
Sample ID: 315987009
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
26-NOV-12 13:50
30-NOV-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
<.ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
]FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Jross Radium Alpha 1.74 +/-0.346
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
;uITogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.464
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDFI 12/08112 1258 1267600
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
99.1 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
American West
ANA LYTiCA L LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~~mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: En~ergy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1212308-001
Client Sample ID: MW-19 _12132012
Collection Date: 12/13/2012 0800h
Received Date: 12/14/2012 1000h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mglL 12/17/2012 l100h 1211812012 1848h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mglL 12/20/2012 0641h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mglL 1212012012 0641h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mglL 1211712012 1526h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mglL 1211912012 0403h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 12119/2012 1612h E353.2 1.00
Sulfate mg/L 12117/2012 1503h E300.0 100
Total Dissolved Solids mglL 12114/2012 1245h SM2540C 20.0
1 _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LeS.
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
174
< 1.00
34.2
0.972
3.96
759
1,300
Report Date: 12/2612012 Page 5 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are peiformed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection with the adverti~ement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~is report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1212308-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-19 _12132012
Collection Date: 12/13/2012 0800h
Received Date: 12114/2012 1000h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/14/2012 1231h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
17060-07-0 54.8 50.00 110
460-00-4 46.6 50.00 93.1
1868-53-7 50.4 50.00 101
2037-26-5 47.8 50.00 95.6
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qnal
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Report Date: 12/26/2012 Page 7 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, promotion or sale .of any product or pro. cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (VSA), Inc.
Address: 225 Vnion Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 5,2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-19 12132012 Proiect: DNMIOOI00
Lab Sample ID: 316780001 Client ID: DNMIOOI
-Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 316780
Collect Date: 13-DEC-12 08:00
Receive Date: 14-DEC-12
Collector: Client
)arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
<;p A 245 Mercury "As Received"
vIercury V ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYV1 12118112 13:59 1270929 1
Vletals Analysis-ICP
WOo 7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
~alcium 177000 500 500 ug/L 1 LS 12118112 16: 13 1270785 2
~hromium V ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 1
~obalt V ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron V ND 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
vIagnesium 68500 500 500 ug/L 1
vIanganese 27.l 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
vIolybdenum V ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
'-l"ickel V ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
vanadium V ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 1
~inc 17.9 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
>otassium 4810 500 500 ug/L 5 JWJ 12119112 00:47 1270785 3
;odium 119000 500 500 ug/L 5
fin V ND 100 100 ug/L 5
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
\rsenic V ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L SKJ 12118112 02:09 1270806 4
3eryllium V ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
~admium V ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
",ead V ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
;elenium 22.0 5.00 5.00 ug/L
fhallium 0.525 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 5.85 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver V ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01/03/13 06:45 1272960 5
~opper V ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 0110411313 : 54 1272960 6
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12117112 0740 1270805
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12128112 1130 1272959
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep BXA1 12117112 1938 1270784
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep EP A 245 Mercury AXS5 12117112 1650 1270926
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: December 20,2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-19 12132012
316780001
Ground Water
13-DEC-12 08:00
l4-DEC-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 4.86 +/-0.670
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.885
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDFl 12/19/12 0725 1270972
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
105 (25%-125%)
American West
ANALYTiCAl. LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-rnail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1212308-002
Client Sample ID: MW-20_12122012
Collection Date: 12/1212012 1210h
Received Date: 12/1412012 1000h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mglL 1211712012 1100h 12118/2012 1852h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mglL 1212012012 0641h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mglL 1212012012 0641h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mglL 12117/2012 1659h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mglL 1211912012 0512h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mglL 12119/2012 1614h E353.2 2.00
Sulfate mgiL 12117/2012 1636h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mglL 12114/2012 1245h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
0.113
31.3
< 1.00
56.6
0.327
15.6
3,020
4,880
Report Date: 12/26/2012 Page 6 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SOW A, and RCRA are perfo.nned in acco.rdance to. NELAC proto.Co.ls. Pertinent sampling info.nnatio.n is Io.cated o.n the attached COCo This repo.rt is pro.vided fo.r the exclusive use o.fthe addressee. Privileges o.f
subsequent useoft~e name o.fthis co.mpany o.r anymember o.fits staff, o.r repro.ductio.n o.fthis repo.rt in. co.nnectio.n v:ith the adverti~ement, promo.tio.n o.r sale .ofany pro.duct o.r process, orin co.nnectio.n with the re.-publicatio.n o.ft?isrepo.rt fo.r any
American West
ANJI.lYTICA L '_ABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-rnail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1212308-002A
Client Sample ID: MW-20_12122012
Collection Date: 1211212012 1210h
Received Date: 12114/2012 1000h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/14/2012 1250h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
CarbQn tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromotluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromotluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
17060-07-0 55.6 50.00 111
460-00-4 47.8 50.00 95.6
1868-53-7 51.6 50.00 103
2037-26-5 48.7 50.00 97.5
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Report Date: 12/26/2012 Page 8 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ....,ith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or pro~ess, or in connection with the re.-publication of f!1is report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-20 12122012
Lab Sample ID: 316780002
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 12-DEC-1212:10
Receive Date: 14-DEC-12
Collector: Client
larameter Qualifier Result
vIercury Analysis-CV AA
PA 245 Mercury "As Received"
viercury U ND
vIetals Analysis-ICP
WOo 71200.2 TAL ''As Received"
:alcium 346000
:hromium U ND
:obalt U ND
ron U ND
viagnesium 10500
vianganese U ND
violybdenum 18.3
~ickel U ND
lanadium 15.1
~inc 20.3
>otassium 22300
;odium 1100000
rin U ND
vIetals Analysis-ICP-MS
~00.81200.2 TAL ''As Received"
'usenic U ND
~eryllium U ND
:admium U ND
.Jead U ND
;elenium 5.14
rhallium U ND
Jranium 0.682
;ilver U ND
:opper U ND
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EPA 245 Mercury
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
SRL CRDL Units
0.500 0.500 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
25.0 25.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
30.0 30.0 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
20.0 20.0 ug/L
15.0 15.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
1000 500 ug/L
100 100 ug/L
5.00 5.00 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
1.00 1.00 ug/L
5.00 5.00 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
0.300 0.300 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
Analyst Date
AXG2 12117/12
AXG2 12128/12
BXAI 12117112
AXS5 12117112
Report Date: February 5, 2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
316780
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1 BYVI 12118/12 14:00 1270929 1
1 LS 12118/12 16:16 1270785 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10 JWJ 12119/12 01 :08 1270785 3
10
10
SKJ 12/18/12 02:15 12708064
SKJ 01103/13 06:49 1272960 5
SKJ 01104/13 13:57 1272960 6
Time Prep Batch
0740 1270805
1130 1272959
1938 1270784
1650 1270926
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: December 20,2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-20 12122012
316780002
Ground Water
12-DEC-1212:10
14-DEC-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha U 1.00 +/-0.328
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.958
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDF1 12/19/12 0726 1270972
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
100 (25%-125%)
American West
ANA LYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-010
Client Sample ID: MW-22_11262012
Collection Date: 11126/2012 1300h
Received Date: 11/30/2012 1045h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 12/3/2012 1315h
Bicarbonate (as mg/L
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L
Chloride mg/L
Fluoride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Sulfate mg/L
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L
Date
Analyzed
12/3/2012 1932h
12/3/2012 1l06h
12/3/2012 1l06h
12/5/2012 0037h
12/11/2012 1630h
12/4/2012 1930h
12/4/2012 2352h
12/3/2012 1430h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Method Reporting
Used Limit
£350.1 0.0500
SM2320B 1.00
SM2320B 1.00
E300.0 10.0
E300.0 1.00
/'
E353.2 1.00
E300.0 1,000
SM2540C 100
Analytical
Result Qual
0.408
45.6
< 1.00
59.7
13.5
2.86
5,290
8,080
~
I
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 16 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, orin connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West ANALYTlCAL LA8 0RATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-rnail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-010A
Client Sample ID: MW-22_11262012
Collection Date: 11/26/2012 1300h
Received Date: 11/30/2012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/3120121331h
Units: IlglL
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
SUIT: Toluene-d8
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
1868-53-7 48.2 50.00 96.5
460-00-4 49.9 50.00 99.8
17060-07-0 50.4 50.00 101
2037-26-5 49.4 50.00 98.7
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
80-124
80-128
72-151
77-129
Report Date: 12112/2012 Page 29 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ~ith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication of t~isreport for any
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1301421-006
Client Sample ID: MW-22_11262012
Collection Date: 11126/2012 1300h
Received Date: 1122/2013 0930h
Contact: Kathy Weinel
Analytical Results TOTAL METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result
Arsenic mg/L 1128/2013 1140h 1129/2013 1133h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
Insufficient sample mass/volume was received to perform MS/MSD analysis. An LCSD was added to provide precision data.
Qual
/\
Report Date: 1130/2013 Page 9 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequen! use. of t~e n~e ?~ this com,,~ny or any me~ber of its sta~ or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ,,:ith ~he adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any i>roduct or p~o.cess, or. in connection ~ith the re:public~tion of t~is report for any
GEL lABORATORIES llC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 7,2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-22 11262012 Proiect: DNMIOOI00
Lab Sample ID: 315987010 Client ID: DNMIOOI
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315987
Collect Date: 26-NOV-12 13:00
Receive Date: 30-NOV-12
Collector: Client
>arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
vIercury Analysis-CV AA
PA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
viercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYVI 12/07112 09:15 1268494 1
vIetals Analysis-ICP
WOo 7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
~alcium 412000 500 500 ug/L 1 LS 12/20/12 12:42 1267256 2
~obalt 469 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron 85.0 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
violybdenum 133 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
~"ickel 276 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
;odium 288000 500 500 ug/L 1
['in U ND 100 100 ug/L 1
~inc 1220 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
~hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 10 LS 12120112 16:11 12672564
viagnesium 1050000 1100 500 ug/L 10
vianganese 43100 20.0 10.0 ug/L 10
>otassium 24200 500 500 ~g/L 10
vanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 10
vIetals Analysis-ICP-MS
?00.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
3eryllium 12.6 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 PRB 12119112 15:00 1267296 5
;elenium 28.1 5.00 5.00 ug/L 1
Jead 7.15 1.00 1.00 ug/L 1 SKJ 12120/12 18:17 12718806
[,hallium 1.31 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1
Jranium 32.1 0.300 0.300 ug/L 1
~admium 195 1.10 0.500 ug/L 10 SKJ 12121112 13 :58 12718807
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1 SKJ 01/03/13 05 :59 1272960 8
~opper 67.6 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1 SKJ 01/04113 13:25 1272960 9
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267295
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28112 1130 1272959
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP MTMI 12120112 1100 1271878
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267254
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep BXAI 12120112 2308 1272111
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: February 7, 2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-22 11262012
315987010
Ground Water
26-NOV-12 13:00
30-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
~ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
]FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha 8.98 +/-0.760
DL
0.488
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOIOO
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDF1 12/08112 1259 1267600
The following Analytical Methods were performed: ----~-----------------------------------------------------------------------Method Description Analyst Comments
EPA 900.1 Modified
;uITogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 101 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
American West
ANALYTI CA L LABO RATOR I ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1212130-001
Client Sample ID: MW-23_12052012
Collection Date: 12/5/2012 1400h
Received Date: 12/7/2012 1012h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 1211Y2012 lOlSh 12112/2012 2241h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 1211212012 0610h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 1211212012 06lOh SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 1211312012 1622h E300.0 1.00
Fluoride mg/L 1211212012 0232h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 12110/2012 2lO3h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mgIL 1211112012 2249h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mgIL 121712012 13lOh SM2540C 20.0
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the Les.
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
252
< 1.00
8.21
0.254
0.220
1,330
3,540
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 5 of18
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
foIl Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
/
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1212130-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-23_12052012
Collection Date: 12/5/2012 1400h
Received Date: 12/7/2012 1012h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 12/10/2012 1155h
Units: /lg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: Toluene-d8
Dilution Factor:
CAS
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
Contact: Garrin Palmer
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
52.1 50.00 104 72-151
50.3 50.00 101 80-128
50.0 50.00 99.9 80-124
48.9 50.00 97.8 77-129
Report Date: 12118/2012 Page 7 of 18
All analyses applicable to. the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfDnned in accordance to. NELAC protDCDls. Pertinent sampling infDnnatiDn is IDcated on the attached COe. This repDrt is provided fDr the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges Df
subsequent use Dfthe name Df this company Dr any member Df its staff, or reprDduction Dfthis report in. connection with the advertisement, promDtiDn Dr sale Df any product Dr process, orin cDnnection with the re.-publicatiDn of this report fDr any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
}arameter
~ercury Analysis-CV AA
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-23 12052012
Lab Sample ID: 316515001
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 05-DEC-12 14:00
Receive Date: II-DEC-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
PA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
viercury U ND
~etals Analysis-ICP
WO.7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
~alcium 422000
~hromium U ND
~obalt U ND
ron U ND
viagnesium 141000
vianganese 54.3
violybdenum U ND
~ickel U ND
;odium 363000
['in U ND
lanadium U ND
~inc 31.8
>otassium 9240
~etals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
\rsenic U ND
~admium U ND
Jead U ND
;elenium U ND
[,hallium 0.568
Jranium 15.6
3eryllium U ND
mver U ND
~opper U ND
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
SRL CRDL
0.500 0.500
500 500
25.0 25.0
10.0 10.0
30.0 30.0
500 500
10.0 10.0
10.0 10.0
20.0 20.0
500 500
100 100
15.0 15.0
10.0 10.0
500 500
5.00 5.00
0.500 0.500
1.00 1.00
5.00 5.00
0.500 0.500
0.300 0.300
0.500 0.500
10.0 10.0
10.0 10.0
Analyst
AXG2
BXAI
BXA1
BXA1
Report Date: February 5,2013
Proiect: DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
316515
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
ug/L 1 BYV1 12/18112 13: 12 1270929 1
ug/L LS 12118112 13:15 1269897 2
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L JWJ 12/18112 23:41 1269897 3
ug/L BAJ 12118112 07:02 1269899 5
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L BAJ 12118112 14:47 1269899 6
ug/L SKJ 01/03/13 06:38 1272960 7
ug/L SKJ 01/04/13 13:50 1272960 8
Date Time Prep Batch
12128112
12112112
12112112
12119112
1130
1952
2002
1910
1272959
1269898
1269896
1271398
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: December 17,2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-23 12052012
316515001
Ground Water
05-DEC-12 14:00
ll-DEC-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 1.73 +/-0.394
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.627
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDFI 12115112 1439 1269735
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
103 (25%-125%)
American West
ANA LY TICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-011
Client Sample ID: MW-24_11292012
Collection Date: 11129/2012 0653h
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 12/3/2012 1315h 12/3/2012 1934h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 12/3/2012 1106h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 12/5/2012 0144h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mg/L 12110/2012 231lh E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 12/4/2012 1909h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 12/5/2012 0059h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11130/2012 1420h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
0.0835
147
< 1.00
48.1
0.558
0.318
2,310
3,980
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 17 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCO This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or pro~ess, orin connection with the re.-publication oft~is report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATOR IES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-011A
Client Sample ID: MW-24_11292012
Collection Date: 11/29/2012 0653h
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/3/2012 1350h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 52.0 50.00 104
1868-53-7 50.4 50.00 101
460-00-4 52.4 50.00 105
17060-07-0 52.8 50.00 106
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 12112/2012 Page 30 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent lise of the name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection \\lith the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this. report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
)arameter
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
MW-24 11292012
315987011
Ground Water
29-NOV-12 06:53
30-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result
"PA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
vlercury U ND
Vletals Analysis-ICP
~OO. 71200.2 TAL ''As Received"
~alcium 469000
~hromium U ND
~obalt U ND
ron 835
vlagnesium 156000
vlanganese 3260
vlolybdenum U ND
..rickel U ND
['in U ND
lanadium U ND
~inc 37.7
>otassium 12500
;odium 509000
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
~00.81200.2 TAL ''As Received"
3eryllium U ND
;elenium U ND
\rsenic U ND
~admium 1.35
~ead U ND
[,hallium 0.666
Jranium 4.02
;ilver U ND
~opper U ND
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
SRL CRDL Units
0.500 0.500 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
25.0 25.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
30.0 30.0 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
20.0 20.0 ug/L
100 100 ug/L
15.0 15.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
1000 500 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
5.00 5.00 ug/L
5.00 5.00 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
1.00 1.00 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
0.300 0.300 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
Report Date: February 7,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
315987
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1 BYVI 12107/12 09: 17 1268494 1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
LS 12/20112 12:54 1267256 2
LS 12/20112 16:23 1267256 4
PRB 12119/12 15:08 1267296 5
SKJ 12/20112 18:13 1271880 6
SKJ 01103/13 06: 10 1272960 7
SKJ 01104113 13:32 1272960 8
The following Prep Methods_w_er_e-"-p_e_r£_o_rm----'._ed ___________________________________ _
Method Description
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
Analyst Date
AXG2 12/03112
AXG2 12/28112
MTMI 12120112
AXG2 12/03112
Time . Prep Batch
0730 1267295
1130 1272959
1100 1271878
0730 1267254
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: February 7, 2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-24 11292012
315987011
Ground Water
29-NOV-12 06:53
30-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
~ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
]FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U 1.00 +/-0.290
DL
0.734
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDF1 12/08/12 1301 1267600
The following Analytical Methods were performed: ------~----------------------------------------------------------------------Method Description Analyst Comments
EPA 900.1 Modified
;uITogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 100 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
American West
ANALYTICA L L ABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-003
Client Sample ID: MW-25_11122012
Collection Date: 11112/2012 1308h
Received Date: 11116/2012 0940h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mgIL 11120/2012 1023h 1112012012 1815h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mglL 1111912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mglL 1111912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mglL 11126/2012 1438h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mgIL 1112112012 1500h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mgIL 1111612012 1652h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mglL 1112112012 0630h E300.0 100
Total Dissolved Solids mgIL 11116/2012 1240h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
0.442
328
< 1.00
28.8
0.298
< 0.100
1,680
2,750
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 9 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e name of this comllany or any. member of its staR or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-003A
Client Sample ID: MW-25_11122012
Collection Date: 11/12/2012 1308h
Received Date: 11/1612012 0940h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 11116/2012 1432h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
l330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 48.5 50.00 97.0
1868-53-7 49.8 50.00 99.6
460-00-4 50.1 50.00 100
17060-07-0 52.3 50.00 105
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
. < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 19 of37
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use ofthc name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ,,:ith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or pro~ess, orin connection with the rc.-publication of this report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 5,2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-25 11122012 Proiect: DNMI00100
Lab Sample ID: 315400003 Client ID: DNMI001
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315400
Collect Date: 12-NOV-12 13:08
Receive Date: 16-NOV-12
Collector: Client
}arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
~ercury Analysis-CV AA
.<;FA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
viercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYVI 12/03112 11 :02 1267206 1
~etals Analysis-ICP
WOo 7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
:alcium 358000 500 500 ug/L LS 12106112 12:03 1264523 2
:hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L
:obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L
ron U ND 30.0 30.0 ug/L
viagnesium 122000 500 500 ug/L
vianganese 1590 10.0 10.0 ug/L
violybdenum 10.9 10.0 10.0 ug/L
'Eckel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L
~inc U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L
>otassium 9380 500 500 ug/L JWJ 12/06/12 21 :07 1264523 5
;odium 296000 500 500 ug/L
~etals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
\.rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L RMJ 11123112 16 :41 1264520 6
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
:admium 1.56 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
;elenium U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L
[,hallium 1.06 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 6.61 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01/03113 22:29 1272955 7
:opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01104113 17:01 1272955 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 11120112 0630 1264518
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12128/12 1130 1272954
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 11120/12 0630 1264522
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep MTMI 12/06112 1330 1268683
EPA 245 .1/245.2 Prep EPA 245 Mercury AXS5 11130112 1551 1267205
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
;:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1301421-001
Client Sample ID: MW -25 _11122012
Collection Date: 11112/2012 1308h
Received Date: 1122/2013 0930h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Tin mg/L 112312013 1255h
Date
Analyzed
1124/2013 0127h
Contact: Kathy Weinel
TOTAL METALS
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
Report Date: 1130/2013 Page 4 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequen~ use. of t~e name of this comp'~ny or any me~ber of its sta!!: or reproduction of this report in. c~nnection v:ith .the adverti~ement, pro:notion or sale .of any product or pro_ce~s, orin co~ection ~ith the re:public~tion ~f t~is report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 30,2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-25 11122012
315400003
Ground Water
12-NOV-12 13:08
l6-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha U 1.00 +/-0.253
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
tiL
0.567
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Result
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDF1 11125/12 1624 1264639
Analyst Comments
Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
100 (25%-125%)
American West
ANALYTI CAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-004
Client Sample ID: MW-26_11152012
Collection Date: 11115/2012 0730h
Received Date: 11/16/2012 0940h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 1112012012 102311 11120/2012 181611 E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 1111912012 064311 SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 1111912012 064311 SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 1112612012 150011 E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mg/L 1112112012 152111 E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 11/1612012 165311 E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 1112112012 075511 E300.0 100
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11116/2012 124011 SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
0.604
331
< 1.00
52.9
0.287
0.550
1,870
3,140
Report Date: 11/29/2012 Page 10 of37
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useoft~e name of this comp'any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in c?nnection v:ith the advertisement, promotion or sakof any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West ANA LYTICAI_ LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-004A
Client Sample ID: MW-26_11152012
Collection Date: 1111512012 0730h
Received Date: 11116/2012 0940h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 11120/20120939h
Units: J.lg/L
Compound
Chloroform
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: 100 Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
67-66-3 100
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 4,930 5,000 98.5
1868-53-7 5,150 5,000 103
460-00-4 5,040 5,000 101
17060-07-0 5,440 5,000 109
~ -The reporting limits were raised due to high analyte concentrations.
Analyzed: 11116/2012 1451h
Units: J.lg/L Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Compound Number Limit
2-Butanone 78-93-3 20.0
Acetone 67-64-1 20.0
Benzene 71-43-2 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.00
Chloromethane 74-87-3 1.00
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 1.00
Naphthalene 91-20-3 1.00
Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 1.00
Toluene 108-88-3 1.00
Xylenes, Total 1330-20-7 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
Surr: Toluene-d8 2037-26-5 48.2 50.00 96.5
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1868-53-7 52.8 50.00 106
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 50.5 50.00 101
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 17060-07-0 53.6 50.00 107
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
4,020
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
34.6
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 11/29/2012 Page 20 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
GEL LASORA TORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 5, 2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: 11VV-26 11152012 Proiect: DN11I00100
Lab Sample ID: 315400004 Client ID: DN11I001
11atrix: Ground VV ater Client SDG: 315400
Collect Date: 15-NOV-12 07:30
Receive Date: 16-NOV-12
Collector: Client
)arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
?PA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
viercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYVI 12/03/12 11 :07 1267206 1
Vletals Analysis-ICP
~OO. 71200.2 TAL "As Received"
:alcium 498000 500 500 ug/L LS 12/06/12 12:06 1264523 2
:hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L
:obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L
ron 606 30.0 30.0 ug/L
viagnesium 174000 500 500 ug/L
vianganese 1100 10.0 10.0 ug/L
violybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L
'ficke1 U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L
rin U ND 100 100 ug/L
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L
~inc 20.9 10.0 10.0 ug/L
>otassium 11100 500 500 ug/L JWJ 12/06/12 21 :10 12645234
;odium 177000 500 500 ug/L
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
~00.81200.2 TAL ''As Received"
\.rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L RMJ 11/23/12 17:01 1264520 5
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
:admium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
;elenium 12.3 5.00 5.00 ug/L
rhallium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 56.8 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01/03/13 22:33 1272955 6
: opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01/04/13 17:04 1272955 7
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 11/20/12 0630 1264518
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28/12 1130 1272954
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 11/20/12 0630 1264522
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep MTMI 12/06/12 1330 1268683
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 30, 2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-26 11152012
Sample ID: 315400004
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
15-NOV-12 07:30
16-NOV-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 3.51 +/-0.426
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.513
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Result
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDF1 11125112 1624 1264639
Analyst Comments
Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
99.1 (25%-125%)
American West
ANALYTICA L LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
foll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
/
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-005
Client Sample ID: MW-27 _11132012
Collection Date: 11113/2012 1305h
Received Date: 11/16/2012 0940h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 1112012012 1023h 1112012012 1817h E350.1 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 1111912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00 370
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 1111912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Chloride mg/L 1112612012 1607h E300.0 10.0 44.2
Fluoride mg/L 1112112012 1542h E300.0 0.100 0.587
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 1111612012 1707h E353.2 1.00 6.90
Sulfate mg/L 1112112012 0837h E300.0 100 451
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11116/2012 1240h SM2540C 20.0 1,070
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 11 of37
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. connection v:ith the advertisement, promotion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANA I.VTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-005A
Client Sample ID: MW-27 _11132012
Collection Date: 11113/2012 1305h
Received Date: 11116/2012 0940h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 11120120120920h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 48.8 50.00 97.5
1868-53-7 49.5 50.00 99.0
460-00-4 50.0 50.00 100
17060-07-0 54.0 50.00 108
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 21 of37
All analyses applicable to. the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfo.nned in acco.rdance to. NELAC proto.Co.ls. Pertinent sampling info.nnatio.n is lo.cated o.n the attached COC. This repo.rt is provided fo.r the exclusive use o.fthe addressee. Privileges o.f
subsequent useoft~e name o.fthis co.mpany o.r any member o.fits staff: o.r repro.ductio.n o.fthis repo.rt in, c?nnection with the advertisement, promo.tio.n o.r sale o.fany product o.r process, o.rin co.nnectio.n with the re.-publicatio.n o.fthis repo.rt fo.r any
American West
ANALYTICAL LAB ORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1301421-002
Client Sample ID: MW-27 _11132012
Collection Date: 11/13/2012 1305h
Received Date: 1122/2013 0930h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Tin mg/L 112312013 1255h
Date
Analyzed
112412013 0138h
Contact: Kathy Weinel
TOTAL METALS
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
Report Date: 113012013 Page 5 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e n~e of this cOffi!'any or any. member of its sta!'!: or reproduction of this report in. c~nnection v:ith ~he adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale ,of any ~roduct or pro_ce~s, or, in con~ection ~ith ~he re_-~ublication ~f t!Iis report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
}arameter
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-27 11132012
Lab Sample ID: 315400005
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 13-NOV-1213:05
Receive Date: 16-NOV-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
PA 245 Mercury "As Received"
v1ercury U ND
Vletals Analysis-ICP
WOo 7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
~a1cium 183000
~hromium U ND
~obalt U ND
ron U ND
v1agnesium 81500
v1anganese U ND
v10lybdenum U ND
'Eckel U ND
lanadium U ND
~inc U ND
>otassium 3890
;odium 68700
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
\.rsenic U ND
3eryllium U ND
~admium U ND
Jead U ND
;elenium 12.3
lhallium U ND
Jranium 29.8
;i1ver U ND
~opper U ND
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 245.1/245.2 Prep
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EP A 245 Mercury
SRL CRDL
0.500 0.500
500 500
25 .0 25.0
10.0 10.0
30.0 30.0
500 500
10.0 10.0
10.0 10.0
20.0 20.0
15.0 15.0
10.0 10.0
500 500
500 500
5.00 5.00
0.500 0.500
0.500 0.500
1.00 1.00
5.00 5.00
0.500 0.500
0.300 0.300
10.0 10.0
10.0 10.0
Analyst
AXG2
AXG2
AXG2
MTM1
AXS5
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: February 5, 2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
315400
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
ug/L 1 BYV1 12/03112 11 :09 1267206 1
ug/L LS 12/06112 12:09 1264523 2
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L JWJ 12/06112 21: 13 1264523 5
ug/L
ug/L RMJ 11/23/12 17:08 1264520 6
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L SKJ 01103/13 22:38 1272955 7
ug/L SKJ 01104/13 17:06 1272955 8
Date Time Prep Batch
11120/12 0630 1264518
12/28112 1130 1272954
11120112 0630 1264522
12/06/12 1330 1268683
11/30/12 1551 1267205
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 30,2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-27 11132012
315400005
Ground Water
13-NOV-1213:05
16-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 1.33 +/-0.273
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.478
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Result
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDF1 11125/12 1624 1264639
Analyst Comments
Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
100 (25%-125%)
American West
ANAI.YTICAL LABORA f ORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-006
Client Sample ID: MW-28_11142012
Collection Date: 1111412012 1100h
Received Date: 11/16/2012 0940h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 11120/2012 1023h 1112012012 1822h E350.1 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 11119/2012 0643h SM2320B 1.00 124
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 1111912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Chloride mg/L 11/2612012 1652h E300.0 10.0 115
Fluoride mg/L 1112112012 1603h E300.0 0.100 0.580
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 1111612012 1700h E353.2 0.100 0.256
Sulfate mg/L 1112612012 1629h E300.0 1,000 1,710
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 1111612012 1240h SM2540C 20.0 3,610
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 12 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. oft~e name of this company or any member of its staft; or reproduction of this report in. connection ,,:,ith the adverti~cment, pro,motion or sale of any product or pro,cess, or in connection with the re,-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICA l LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mai1: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-006A
Client Sample ID: MW-28_11142012
Collection Date: 11114/2012 1100h
Received Date: 11/16/2012 0940h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 1111612012 1529h
Units: Ilg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: To1uene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 49.2 50.00 98.4
1868-53-7 51.4 50.00 103
460-00-4 51.7 50.00 103
17060-07-0 55.3 50.00 111
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 22 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any. member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~is report for any
American West
ANA LY TICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1301421-003
Client Sample ID: MW-28_11142012
Collection Date: 1111412012 1100h
Received Date: 1122/2013 0930h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound
Molybdenum
Tin
Zinc
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Prepared
1123/2013 1255h
1123/2013 1255h
1123/2013 1255h
Date
Analyzed
1/23/2013 1816h
1124/2013 0148h
112312013 1816h
Contact: Kathy Weinel
TOTAL METALS
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
E200.8 0.100 · < 0.100
E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Report Date: 1130/2013 Page 6 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequen~ use. of t~e n~e ?~ this cO~p'~ny or any. me?Iber of its sta~ or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection vo:ith ~he adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale .of any product or p~o_ce~s, or. in co~ection ~ith ~he re_-~ublic~tion ?f t~is report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
)arameter
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
MW-28 11142012
315400006
Ground Water
14-NOV-1211:00
16-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result
PA 245 Mercury "As Received"
v1ercury U ND
Vletals Analysis-ICP
W0.7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
:hromium U ND
:oba1t 33.4
ron U ND
v1agnesium 175000
v1anganese 1680
~icke1 24.4
lanadium U ND
:alcium 507000
>otassium 13700
;odium 309000
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
"1.rsenic 10.1
3eryllium U ND
:admium 4.37
~ead U ND
;e1enium U ND
[,hallium 0.901
Jranium 3.45
;i1ver U ND
:opper 11.9
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep EP A 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
SRL CRDL
0.500 0.500
25.0 25.0
10.0 10.0
30.0 30.0
500 500
10.0 10.0
20.0 20.0
15.0 15.0
500 500
500 500
1000 500
5.00 5.00
0.500 0.500
0.500 0.500
1.00 1.00
5.00 5.00
0.500 0.500
0.300 0.300
10.0 10.0
10.0 10.0
Analyst
AXG2
AXG2
AXG2
MTM1
AXS5
Report Date: February 5, 2013
Proiect: DNMI00100
DNMI001
315400
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
ug/L 1 BYV1 12/03/12 11: 11 1267206 1
ug/L LS 12/06/12 12:12 1264523 2
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L 5 LS 12/06/12 14:20 1264523 4
ug/L 10 JWJ 12/06/12 21 :44 1264523 5
ug/L 10
ug/L RMJ 11123/12 17: 14 1264520 6
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L SKJ 01103/13 22:50 1272955 7
ug/L SKJ 01104/13 17:08 1272955 8
Date Time Prep Batch
11120/12 0630 1264518
12/28/12 1130 1272954
11120/12 0630 1264522
12/06/12 1330 1268683
11130/12 1551 1267205
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 30,2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-28 11142012
Sample ID: 315400006
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
14-NOV-1211:00
16-NOV-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 1.50 +/-0.292
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.452
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Result
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDF1 11125/12 1624 1264639
Analyst Comments
Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
100 (25%-125%)
American West
ANA LYTICA L LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-007
Client Sample ID: MW-29 _11142012
Collection Date: 1111412012 1350h
Received Date: 11/16/2012 0940h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 1112012012 1023h 1112012012 1823h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 1111912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 1111912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 1112612012 1736h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mg/L 1112112012 1625h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 1111612012 1702h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 11126/2012 1714h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11116/2012 1240h SM2540C 20.0
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Analytical
Result Qual
0.635
283
< 1.00
36.9
0.717
< 0.100
1,340
4,430
Report Date: 11/29/2012 Page 13 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached cae. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useoft~e name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection v:ith the adverti~ement. promotion or sale.of any product or pro~ess. orin connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTI CA L LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-007A
Client Sample ID: MW-29 _11142012
Collection Date: 11114/2012 1350h
Received Date: 1111612012 0940h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 11116/2012 1548h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
SUIT: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 47.8 50.00 95.7
1868-53-7 50.8 50.00 102
460-00-4 49.6 50.00 99.2
17060-07-0 55.0 50.00 110
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 11/29/2012 Page 23 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any. member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~is. report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 5, 2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-29 11142012 Proiect: DNMI00100
Lab Sample ID: 315400007 Client ID: DNMI001
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315400
Collect Date: 14-NOV-1213:50
Receive Date: 16-NOV-12
Collector: Client
)arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
v.Iercury Analysis-CV AA
"EPA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
vIercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYVI 12/03112 11:12 1267206 1
v.Ietals Analysis-ICP
~OO.7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
:a1cium 483000 500 500 ug/L LS 12/06112 12:16 1264523 2
:hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L
:obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L
ron 1350 30.0 30.0 ug/L
vIagnesium 219000 500 500 ug/L
vIanganese 5040 10.0 10.0 ug/L
vIolybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L
'Eckel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L
['in U ND 100 100 ug/L
vanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L
~inc 14.0 10.0 10.0 ug/L
>otassium 17200 500 500 ug/L JWJ 12/06112 21 :19 1264523 5
;odium 487000 500 500 ug/L
v.Ietals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
\rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L RMJ 11123/12 17:20 1264520 6
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
:admium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jead U ND 1.00 l.00 ug/L
;elenium U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L
[,hallium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 1l.2 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01103113 22:54 1272955 7
:opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01104/13 17:15 1272955 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 11/20112 0630 1264518
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28112 1130 1272954
EPA 200.2 rCP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 11120112 0630 1264522
EPA 200.2 rcp-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep MTMI 12/06112 1330 1268683
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 30, 2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-29 11142012
Sample ID: 315400007
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
14-NOV-12 13:50
16-NOV-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 1.32 +/-0.268
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.409
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDF1 11125/12 1624 1264639
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
101 (25%-125%)
American West
ANALYTICA L LABOR ATO RIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-008
Client Sample ID: MW-30_11132012
Collection Date: 11113/2012 1140h
Received Date: 11116/2012 0940h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 1112012012 1023h 1112012012 1826h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 11119/2012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 11119/2012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 11126/2012 1758h E300.0 100
Fluoride mg/L 1112112012 1646h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 11116/2012 1708h E353.2 1.00
Sulfate mg/L 1112112012 1045h E300.0 100
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11116/2012 1240h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
150
< 1.00
114
0.329
18.5
758
1,520
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 14 of37
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~is report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LASORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80l) 263-8687
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
,Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-008A
Client Sample ID: MW-30_11132012
Collection Date: 11113/2012 1140h
Received Date: 11116/2012 0940h
Contact: Gaffiri Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 11116/2012 1607h
Units: ~g/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: To1uene-d8
Surr: Dibromotluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromotluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dich10roethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 48.5 50.00 97.0
1868-53-7 51.5 50.00 103
460-00-4 50.8 50.00 102
17060-07-0 57.0 50.00 114
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-15.1
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 24 of37
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent lise of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection v:ith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~isreport for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATOR I ES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80l) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1301421-004
Client Sample ID: MW-30_11132012
Collection Date: 11113/2012 1140h
Received Date: 1122/2013 0930h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Tin mg/L 1123/2013 1255h
Date
Analyzed
112412013 0159h
Contact: Kathy Weinel
TOTAL METALS
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result Qual
E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
Report Date: 1130/2013 Page 7 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCO This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequen~ use. of t~e name o~ this comp'~ny or any member of its sta!!! or reproduction of this report in. c~nnection v.:ith the .adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale .of any product or p~o_ce~s, or. in con~ection with the re_-~ublic~tion ?f t!tis report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 5,2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-30 11132012 Proiect: DNMIOOIOO
Lab Sample ID: 315400008 Client ID: DNMIOOI
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315400
Collect Date: 13-NOV-1211 :40
Receive Date: 16-NOV-12
Collector: Client
>arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
?FA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
viercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYV1 12/03/12 11: 14 1267206 1
Vletals Analysis-ICP
WOo 71200.2 TAL ''As Received"
:a1cium 266000 500 500 ug/L LS 12/06112 12: 19 1264523 2
:hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L
:obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L
ron 49.2 30.0 30.0 ug/L
viagnesium 70600 500 500 ug/L
vianganese 25.4 10.0 10.0 ug/L
violybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L
~ickel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L
lanadium U ND 15.0 15 .0 ug/L
~inc U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L
>otassium 6600 500 500 ug/L JWJ 12/06112 21 :22 1264523 5
;odium 105000 500 500 ug/L
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
~00.81200.2 TAL ''As Received"
\rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L RMJ 11/23112 17:26 1264520 6
~eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
:admium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
-,ead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
;elenium 36.0 5.00 5.00 ug/L
lhallium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 7.03 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01 /03/13 22:59 1272955 7
:opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01 /04/13 17: 17 1272955 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 11/20112 0630 1264518
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28/12 1130 1272954
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 11120112 0630 1264522
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep MTM1 12/06112 1330 1268683
EPA 245.1/245.2 Prep EP A 245 Mercury AXS5 11/30112 1551 1267205
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 30,2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-30 11132012
315400008
Ground Water
13-NOV-12 11 :40
16-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha U 1.00 +/-0.239
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
DL
0.490
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDFI 11125/12 1624 1264639
Method Descn=·p~ti=o=n ________________________________________ ~A~n=al~y~st~C~omm~~e~n~ts~ __________________ __
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received" 102 (25%-125%)
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211109-001
Client Sample ID: MW-31_ 11062012
Collection Date: 111612012 1345h
Received Date: 11/7/2012 1412h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Ammonia (as N) mglL 1111312012 1215h 11113/2012 2009h E350.1 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mgIL 11115/2012 1000h SM2320B 1.00 172 A
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) ·mglL 1111512012 1000h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00 A
Chloride mglL 1111312012 0551h E300.0 100 189
Fluoride mglL 1111312012 0640h E300.0 0.100 0.763
NitratelNitrite(as N) mgIL 11112/2012 1900h E353.2 10.0 23.6
Sulfate mgIL 11113/2012 0551h E300.0 100 557
Total Dissolved Solids mgIL 11/912012 1350h SM2540C 20.0 1,230
A _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
Report Date: 11127/2012 Page 5 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached cae. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in connection \\,ith the adverti~ement, promotion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~is report for any
American West AN ALYTICA L L ABORATORIE S
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
;:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211109-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-31_11062012
Collection Date: 1116/2012 1345h
Received Date: 11/7/2012 1412h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 1118/20120945h
Units: /lg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
X ylenes, Total
Dilution Factor:
CAS
Number
78-93-3
67-64-1
71-43-2
56-23-5
67-66-3
74-87-3
75-09-2
91-20-3
109-99-9
108-88-3
1330-20-7
Method: SW8260C
Reporting Analytical
Limit Result Qual
20.0 <20.0
20.0 <20.0
1.00 < 1.00
1.00 < 1.00
1.00 < 1.00
1.00 < 1.00
1.00 < 1.00
1.00 < 1.00 @
1.00 < 1.00
1.00 < 1.00
1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
SUIT: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
2037-26-5
1868-53-7
460-00-4
17060-07-0
52.0
49.6
53.4
53.9
@ -High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference.
50.00 104 77-129
50.00 99.3 80-124
50.00 107 80-128
50.00 108 72-151
Report Date: 11/20/2012 Page 7 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useoft~e name of this comp'any or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ,,:,ith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro~ess, orin connection with the rc.-publication of t~isreport for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
)arameter
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW -31 11062012
Lab Sample ID: 314781001
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 06-NOV-12 13:45
Receive Date: 08-NOV-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
"PA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
\1ercury U ND
Vletals Analysis-ICP
~OO. 71200.2 TAL ''As Received"
~alcium 182000
~hromium U ND
~obalt U ND
ron U ND
\1agnesium 86500
\1anganese U ND
\1olybdenum U ND
'Hckel U ND
>otassium 5650
;odium 92600
lanadium U ND
~inc U ND
['in U ND
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
~00.81200.2 TAL ''As Received"
'Hsenic U ND
~admium U ND
~ead U ND
;elenium 76.9
[,hallium U ND
3eryllium U ND
Jranium 8.73
;ilver U ND
~opper U ND
The following Prep lVlethods were performed
Method
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
Description
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
SRL CRDL Units
0.500 0.500 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
25.0 25.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
30.0 30.0 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
20.0 20.0 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
15.0 15.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
100 100 ug/L
5.00 5.00 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
1.00 1.00 ug/L
5.00 5.00 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
0.300 0.300 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
Analyst Date
AXG2 12128112
MTMI 11113112
AXG2 11121112
BXAI 11128112
Report Date: February 5,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
314781
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1 BYVI 11121112 08:07 1265083 1
1 LS 11128112 12:26 12617422
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10 LS 11128112 15:50 1261742 3
RMJ 11120112 05: 11 1261744 5
RMJ 11121112 03:31 1261744 6
SKJ 01107/13 17:48 1272955 7
SKJ 01/04113 16:29 1272955 8
Time Prep Batch
1130 1272954
0900 1261743
1235 1261741
1916 1266786
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 26, 2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-31 11062012
314781001
Ground Water
06-NOV-1213:45
08-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 1.07 +/-0.346
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.838
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDF1 · 11124112 1210 1265406
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
105 (25%-125%)
American West AN ALYTICAL LA BORATOR IES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211109-002
Client Sample ID: MW-32_11062012
Collection Date: 11/6/2012 1330h
Received Date: 11/7/2012 1412h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Ammonia (as N) mgIL 11113/2012 1215h 11113/2012 2022h E350.1 0.0500 0.629
Bicarbonate (as mgIL IlfJ5/2012 1000h SM2320B 1.00 410 A
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mgIL 11115/2012 1000h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00 A
Chloride mg/L 11113/2012 0905h E300.0 10.0 32.1
Fluoride mgIL 11113/2012 0929h E300.0 0.100 0.214
NitratelNitrite (as N) mgIL 1111212012 1854h E353.2 0.100 < 0.100
Sulfate mgIL 11113/2012 1348h E300.0 1,000 1,710
Total Dissolved Solids mgIL 1119/2012 1350h SM2540C 20.0 3,570
A _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
Report Date: 11127/2012 Page 6 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this comp'any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection v:ith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .ofany product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication oft~isreport for any
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211109-002A
American West Client Sample ID: MW-32_11062012
A NALYT1CAL LABORATORIES Collection Date: 1116/2012 1330h
Received Date: 11/7/2012 1412h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 1118/2012 1004h
Units: J.lg/L Dilution Factor:
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Phone: [phone] Benzene
Toll Free: [phone] Carbon tetrachloride
Fax: [phone] Chloroform
~-mail: [e-mail] Chloromethane
web: www.awal-Iabs.com Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Kyle F. Gross Toluene
Laboratory Director Xylenes, Total
Contact: Garrin Palmer
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Jose Rocha Surr: Toluene-d8 2037-26-5 52.2 50.00 104 77-129
QA Officer Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1868-53-7 50.1 50.00 100 80-124
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 56.6 50.00 113 80-128
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 17060-07-0 53.6 50.00 107 72-151
Report Date: 11/20/2012 Page 8 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. oft~e name of this company or any member of its statt: or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection \\lith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale of any product or pro~ess, orin connection with the re.-publication oft~isreport for any
GEL LASORA TORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 5, 2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-32 11062012 Proiect: DNMIOOI00
Lab Sample ID: 314781002 Client ID: DNMIOOI
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 314781
Collect Date: 06-NOV-12 13:30
Receive Date: 08-NOV-12
Collector: Client
}arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
vlercury Analysis-CV AA
"P A 245 Mercury ''As Received"
vlercury" U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYVl' 11 /21112 08: 14 1265083 1
vletals Analysis-ICP
~OO. 71200.2 TAL ''As Received"
:alcium 480000 500 500 ug/L LS 11128112 12:38 1261742 2
:hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L
:obalt 29.7 10.0 10.0 ug/L
ron 3480 30.0 30.0 ug/L
vlagnesium 208000 500 500 ug/L
vlanganese 4810 10.0 10.0 ug/L
vlolybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L
lJickel 33.7 20.0 20.0 ug/L
>otassium 14100 500 500 ug/L
;odium 226000 500 500 ug/L
['in U ND 100 100 ug/L
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L
~inc 48.1 10.0 10.0 ug/L
vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
~00.81200.2 TAL ''As Received"
hsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L r RMJ 11 /20112 05:30 1261744 5
:admium 0.509 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1
Jead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L 1
;elenium U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L 1
[,hallium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 RMJ 11121112 03:35 1261744 6
Jranium 1.90 0.300 0.300 ug/L 1
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1 SKJ 01103/13 21 :47 1272955 7
:opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1 SKJ 01104113 16:38 1272955 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12128112 1130 1272954
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP MTMI 11113112 0900 1261743
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 11/21112 1235 1261741
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep BXAI 11128112 1916 1266786
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 26,2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Bqulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-32 11062012
314781002
Ground Water
06-NOV-12 13:30
08-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 2.97 +/-0.524
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.755
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Result
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDF1 11124112 1211 1265406
Analyst Comments
Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
103 (25%-125%)
American West
A NALY TICAl LABORATO RIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-009
Client Sample ID: MW-35_11132012
Collection Date: 11113/2012 1345h
Received Date: 11/16/2012 0940h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mgIL 11120/2012 1023h 11120/2012 1828h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mgIL 1111912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 1111912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 1112612012 1843h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mg/L 1112112012 1707h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 11116/2012 1704h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 1112612012 1820h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mgIL 1111612012 1240h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
0.0954
335
< 1.00
66.6
0.352
< 0.100
1,600
3,840
Report Date: 11/29/2012 Page 15 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfOlmed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useof the name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, orin connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANA LY TICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80l) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-009A
Client Sample ID: MW-35 _11132012
Collection Date: 11113/2012 1345h
Received Date: 1111612012 0940h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 11116/2012 1626h
Units: /lg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
SUIT: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 48.4 50.00 96.8
1868-53-7 52.5 50.00 105
460-00-4 49.5 50.00 99.0
17060-07-0 58.1 50.00 116
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 25 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useoft~e name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, promotion or sale.of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of thisreport for any
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
463 West 3600 South
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1301421-005
Client Sample ID: MW-35_11132012
Collection Date: 11113/2012 1345h
Received Date:
Analytical Results
Compound
1122/2013 0930h
Units
Date
Prepared
Date
Analyzed
~alt Lake City, UT 84115 Tin mg/L
mg/L
112312013 1255h 1124/2013 0209h
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Zinc 112312013 1255h 1124/2013 1855h
Contact: Kathy Weinel
Method
Used
E200.8
E200.8
Reporting
Limit
0.100
0.0100
TOTAL METALS
Analytical
Result
< 0.l00
< 0.0100
Qual
Report Date: 1130/2013 Page 8 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached coc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of t~e n~e ?~ this comp'~ny or any. me~ber of its sta!!: or reproduction of this report ir: c?nnection v:ith ~he adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale .of any product or pro_ce~s, or. in con~ection with ~he re_-~ublication of ~is report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 5, 2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-35 11132012 Proiect: DNMIOOI00
Lab Sample ID: 315400009 Client ID: DNMIOOI
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315400
Collect Date: 13-NOV-12 13:45
Receive Date: 16-NOV-12
Collector: Client
larameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
PA 245 Mercury "As Received"
vlercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYVl12/03112 11:16 12672061
Vletals Analysis-ICP
~OO. 71200.2 TAL ''As Received"
~hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 1 LS 12/06/12 12:22 1264523 2
~obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron 137 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
vlagnesium 153000 500 500 ug/L 1
vlanganese 241 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
~ickel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
vanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 1
~alcium 512000 500 500 ug/L 5 LS 12/06112 14:30 1264523 4
vlolybdenum 30.4 10.0 10.0 ug/L 5
>otassium 12800 500 500 ug/L 10 JWJ 12/06112 21 :47 1264523 5
;odium 391000 1000 500 ug/L 10
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
~00.81200.2 TAL ''As Received"
\rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L RMJ 11/23/12 17:32 1264520 6
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
~admium U ND 0.500 .0.500 ug/L
.Jead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
;elenium 15.4 5.00 5.00 ug/L
[,hallium 0.554 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 21.8 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01103/13 23:03 1272955 7
~opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01104/13 17:19 1272955 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 11/20/12 0630 1264518
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28112 1130 1272954
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 11120112 0630 1264522
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep MTM1 12/06112 1330 1268683
EPA 245.1/245.2 Prep EPA 245 Mercury AXS5 11/30112 1551 1267205
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 30, 2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-35 11132012
315400009
Ground Water
13-NOV-1213:45
16-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 4.23 +1-0.481
The following Analytical Methods were performed: .
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.663
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDFI 11125/12 1624 1264639
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
102 (25%-125%)
American West
ANA LYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-010
Client Sample ID: MW-36_11142012
Collection Date: 1111412012 0900h
Received Date: 11/16/2012 0940h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 1112012012 1023h 1lI2012012 1829h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 1111912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 1111912012 0643h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 11126/2012 1927h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mg/L 1112112012 1728h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 1111612012 1706h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mgiL 11126/2012 1905h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11116/2012 1240h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
294
< 1.00
58.9
0.306
0.199
2,ioO
4,240
Report Date: 11/29/2012 Page 16 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. connection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale.of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANA LY T ICAL LA BORATOR IES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211249-010A
Client Sample ID: MW-36_11142012
Collection Date: 11114/2012 0900h
Received Date: 11116/2012 0940h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 11116/2012 1645h
Units: /-lg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes,Total
Surrogate
Surr: To1uene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dich10roethane-d4
Dilution Factor: 1 Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 48.5 50.00 97.0
1868-53-7 52.2 50.00 , 104
460-00-4 50.8 50.00 102
17060-07-0 59.0 50.00 118
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 26 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of t~e name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection v:ith the advertisement, promotion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~is report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 5,2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-36 11142012 Proiect: DNMIOOI00
Lab Sample ID: 315400010 Client ID: DNMIOOI
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315400
Collect Date: 14-NOV-12 09:00
Receive Date: 16-NOV-12
Collector: Client
)arameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
vIercury Analysis-CV AA
~A 245 Mercury "As Received"
v1ercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYV1 12/03/12 11: 17 1267206 1
vIetals Analysis-ICP
~OO. 7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
:alcium 432000 500 500 ug/L 1 LS 12/06/12 12:26 1264523 2
:hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 1
:obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron U ND 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
v1agnesium 135000 500 500 ug/L 1
v1anganese U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
v10lybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
~ickel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
rin U ND 100 100 ug/L 1
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 1
~inc U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
>otassium 9540 500 500 ug/L 10 JWJ 12/06/12 21 :28 1264523 5
;odium 682000 1000 500 ug/L 10
vIetals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
\.rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L RMJ 11/23/12 17:39 1264520 6
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
:admium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
.Jead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
;elenium 272 5.00 5.00 ug/L
rhallium 0.765 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 21.4 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01/03/13 23:07 1272955 7
:opper U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01104/13 17:22 1272955 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 11120/12 0630 1264518
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28/12 1130 1272954
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 11120/12 0630 1264522
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep MTM1 12/06/12 1330 1268683
GEL LABORATORIES LlC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 30, 2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-36 11142012
315400010
Ground Water
14-NOV-12 09:00
16-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 2.04 +/-0.341
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.567
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
l.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDFI 11125112 1624 1264639
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
102 (25%-125%)
American West ANALY TICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1212130-002
Client Sample ID: MW-37 _12052012
Collection Date: 12/5/2012 1310h
Received Date: 1217 /2012 1012h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 1211212012 lO15h 12112/2012 2245h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 12/12/2012 0610h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 12112/2012 0610h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 1211212012 2008h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mg/L 1211212012 0254h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 1211012012 2111h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 12/1212012 0041h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 121712012 B10h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
231
< 1.00
46.6
0.229
0.903
1,010
3,830
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 6 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t1~e name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. connection v:-ith the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West ANA LYTICA L LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mai1: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1212130-002A
Client Sample ID: MW-37 _12052012
Collection Date: 12/5/2012 1310h
Received Date: 1217 12012 1012h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/1012012 1214h
Units: Jlg/L Dilution Factor: Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Compound Number Limit Result Qual
2-Butanone 78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
Acetone 67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
Benzene 71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
Chloroform 67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
Chloromethane 74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
Naphthalene 91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Toluene 108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
Xylenes, Total 1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 17060-07-0 52.6 50.00 105 72-151
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 51.1 50.00 102 80-128
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane 1868-53-7 50.1 50.00 100 80-124
SUIT: Toluene-d8 2037-26-5 49.6 50.00 99.2 77-129
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 8 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are pelfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
;:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Kathy Weinel
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1301421-007
Client Sample ID: MW-37 _12052012
Collection Date: 12/5/2012 1310h
Received Date: 112212013 0930h
Analytical Results TOTAL METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units P~epared Analyzed Used Limit Result
Iron mg/L 1123/2013 1255h 1123/2013 1827h E200.8 0.0300 < 0.0300
Manganese mg/L 1123/2013 1255h 1124/2013 1911h E200.8 0.0100 0.0125
Molybdenum mg/L 1123/2013 1255h 1123/2013 1827h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Zinc mg/L 1123/2013 1255h 1123/2013 1827h E200.8 0.0100 0.0203
Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
Qual
Report Date: 1/30/2013 Page 10 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequen~ use. of t~e n~e of this comp'~ny or anyme~ber of its sta!!? or reproduction of this report in. c~nnection v:ith !he .adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any ~roduct or pro. cess, or in con~ection with the re:~ublication of t~lis report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: . Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
)arameter
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
Suite 60.0.
Lakewood, Colorado 80.228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-37 12052012
Lab Sample ID: 316515002
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 05-DEC-12 l3:10
Receive Date: 11-DEC-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
PA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
viercury U ND
Vletals Analysis-ICP
~OO. 7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
=alcium 4540.0.0.
=hromium U ND
=obalt U ND
viagnesium 13100.0.
~ickel U ND
;odium 5140.0.0.
lanadium U ND
>otassium 1420.0.
['in U ND
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
hsenic U ND
=admium U ND
Jead U ND
;elenium U ND
[,hallium U ND
Jranium 15.5
3eryllium U ND
;ilver U ND
=opper U ND
SRL
0..50.0.
50.0.
25 .0.
10..0.
lIDO.
20..0.
100.0.
15.0.
50.0.
10.0.
5.0.0.
0..50.0.
1.0.0.
5.0.0.
0..50.0.
0..30.0.
0..50.0.
10..0.
10.0.
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
CRDL Units
0..50.0. ug/L
50.0. ug/L
25.0 ug/L
10..0. ug/L
5DQ , ug/L
20..0. . ug/L
50.0.. ug/L
15.0.-ug/L
50.0. ug/L
10.0. ug/L
5.Dp ug/L
0..50.0. . ug/L
1.0.0. ug/L
5.0.0. ug/L
0..50.0. ug/L
0..30.0. ug/L
0..50.0. ug/L
10.0. ug/L
10..0. ug/L
Report Date: February 5, 20.13
DNMI00100
DNMI001
316515
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1 BYVI 12118112 13:18 1270.929 1
10 LS 12118/12 13:18 1269897 2
10.
10.
10.
10.
10
10
10 JWJ 12118/12 23:44 1269897 3
20. LS 12118112 14:41 1269897 5
BAJ 12/18112 0.7:0.9 1269899 6
BAJ 12118/12 14:51 1269899 7
SKJ 0.1 /0.3/13 0.6:42 1272960. 8
SKJ 0.1104/13 13:52 1272960. 9
The following Prep Me._th_o_d_s _w_e_re--'p'-e_r_fo_r_m_e_d __________________________________ _
Method Description
EPA 20.0..2
EPA 20.0..2
EPA 20.0..2
EPA 20.0..2
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
ICP-MS 20.0..2 PREP
ICP-MS 20.0..2 PREP
ICP-TRACE 20.0..2 Liquid Prep
ICP-TRACE 20.0..2 Liquid Prep
EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
Analyst
AXG2
BXAI
BXAI
BXAI
AXS5
Date Time Prep Batch
12/28112 1130. 1272959
12/12112 1952 1269898
12112112 20.0.2 1269896
12119112 1910 1271398
12117/12 1650. 1270.926
Analyst Comments
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: December 17,2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-37 12052012
Sample ID: 316515002
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
05-DEC-1213:10
ll-DEC-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 1.18 +/-0.353
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.789
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDF1 12/15/12 1439 1269735
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
105 (25%-125%)
American West
ANAI.YTICAL LABORATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-012
Client Sample ID: MW-65_11272012
Collection Date: 11127/2012 0855h
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mg/L 12/3/2012 1315h 12/3/2012 1935h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mg/L 12/10/2012 2333h E300.0 1.00
Fluoride mg/L 12/10/2012 2333h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 12/4/2012 1910h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mg/L 12/5/2012 0206h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 11130/2012 1420h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
310
< 1.00
6.80
0.286
< 0.100
1,470
3,010
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 18 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use oft~e name of this company or any member of its staft: or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ",:,ith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale of any product or pro.cess, orin connection with the re.-publication oft~isreport for any
American West
ANA LYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-012A
Client Sample ID: MW-65 _11272012
Collection Date: 11/2712012 0855h
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 12/312012 1409h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 51.5 50.00 103
1868-53-7 50.0 50.00 100
460-00-4 52.6 50.00 105
17060-07-0 52.2 50.00 104
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 31 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, promotion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the r(>~-publication of t~is report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
>arameter
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-65 11272012
Lab Sample ID: 315987012
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 27-NOV-12 08:55
Receive Date: 30-NOV-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
"P A 245 Mercury ''As Received"
vIercury U ND
Vletals Analysis-ICP
WOo 7/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
:alcium 316000
:hromium U ND
:obalt U ND
ron U ND
vIagnesium 88600
vIanganese U ND
vIolybdenum U ND
~ickel U ND
['in U ND
lanadium U ND
~inc U ND
>otassium 9980
;odium 515000
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.8/200.2 TAL ''As Received"
3eryllium U ND
;elenium 11.4
\rsenic U ND
:admium U ND
Jead U ND
[,hallium U ND
Jranium 13.1
;ilver U ND
:opper U ND
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
Description
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
SRL CRDL Units
0.500 0.500 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
25.0 25.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
30.0 30.0 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
20.0 20.0 ug/L
100 100 ug/L
15.0 15.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
500 500 ug/L
1000 500 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
5.00 5.00 ug/L
5.00 5.00 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
1.00 1.00 ug/L
0.500 0.500 ug/L
0.300 0.300 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
10.0 10.0 ug/L
Analyst Date
AXG2 12/03112
AXG2 12128/12
MTMI 12120112
AXG2 12/03112
Report Date: February 7,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
315987
DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
1 BYV1 12/07112 09:18 1268494 1
1 LS 12/20112 12:57 1267256 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10 LS 12/20112 16:26 1267256 4
10
PRB 12/19112 15: 13 1267296 5
SKJ 12120112 17:59 1271880 6
SKJ 01103/13 06:31 12729607
SKJ 01104113 13:45 1272960 8
Time Prep Batch
0730 1267295
1130 1272959
1100 1271878
0730 1267254
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: February 7, 2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID: .
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
MW-65 11272012
315987012
Ground Water
27-NOV-12 08:55
30-NOV-12
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
~ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
:JFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Jross Radium Alpha 2.10 +/-0.386
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
;uITogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.546
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Result
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDFI 12/08112 1259 1267600
Analyst Comments
Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
97.0 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-013
Client Sample ID: MW-70_11282012
Collection Date: 11/28/2012 1045h
Received Date: 11/30/2012 1045h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Ammonia (as N) mglL 12/3/2012 1315h 12/3/2012 1936h E350.1 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mgIL 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mglL 12/3/2012 1l06h SM2320B 1.00
Chloride mglL 12/5/2012 0527h E300.0 10.0
Fluoride mglL 12110/2012 2356h E300.0 0.100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mglL 12/4/2012 1911h E353.2 0.100
Sulfate mgIL 12/5/2012 0442h E300.0 1,000
Total Dissolved Solids mgIL 11130/2012 1420h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
< 0.0500
365
< 1.00
39.8
0.226
1.44
1,420
3,540
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 19 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this comj>any or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ",:,ith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re.-publication oft?isreport for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211436-013A
Client Sample ID: MW-70_11282012
Collection Date: 11128/2012 1045h
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 12/3/2012 1428h
Units: IlglL
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Dibromotluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromotluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
SUIT: Toluene-d8
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
1868-53-7 50.7 50.00 101
460-00-4 54.9 50.00 110
17060-07-0 53.0 50.00 106
2037-26-5 52.2 50.00 104
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
80-124
80-128
72-151
77-129
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 32 of 42
All analyses applicable to. the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfo.rmed in accordance to. NELAC pro.to.co.ls. Pertinent sampling info.rmatio.n is lo.cated o.n the attached COc. This repo.rt is pro.vided fo.r the exclusive use o.fthe addressee. Privileges o.f
subsequent use o.f the name o.f this co.mpany o.r any member o.f its staff; o.r repro.ductio.n o.f this repo.rt in. c?nnectio.n v:ith the adverti~ement, promo.tio.n o.r sale o.f any pro.duct o.r pro..cess, o.r in co.nnectio.n with the re.-publicatio.n o.f t~is repo.rt fo.r any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report Date: February 7,2013
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-70 11282012 Proiect: DNMIOOI00
Lab Sample ID: 315987013 Client ID: DNMIOOI
Matrix: Ground Water Client SDG: 315987
Collect Date: 28-NOV-12 10:45
Receive Date: 30-NOV-12
Collector: Client
larameter Qualifier Result SRL CRDL Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Vlercury Analysis-CV AA
?FA 245 Mercury ''As Received"
viercury U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L 1 BYVI 12/07112 09:20 1268494 1
Vletals Analysis-ICP
WOo 71200.2 TAL ''As Received"
~a1cium 329000 500 500 ug/L 1 LS 12120112 13:00 1267256 2
~hromium U ND 25.0 25.0 ug/L 1
~obalt U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
ron U ND 30.0 30.0 ug/L 1
viagnesium 156000 500 500 ug/L 1
vianganese 74.9 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
violybdenum U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
~ickel U ND 20.0 20.0 ug/L 1
rin U ND 100 100 ug/L 1
lanadium U ND 15.0 15.0 ug/L 1
~inc U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L 1
>otassium 11700 500 500 ug/L 10 LS 12120112 16:29 1267256 4
;odium 552000 1000 500 ug/L 10
Vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
~00.81200.2 TAL ''As Received"
3eryllium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L PRB 12119112 15: 17 1267296 5
;elenium 16.6 5.00 5.00 ug/L
\.rsenic U ND 5.00 5.00 ug/L SKJ 12120112 17:55 1271880 6
~admium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
.Jead U ND 1.00 1.00 ug/L
lhallium U ND 0.500 0.500 ug/L
Jranium 23.3 0.300 0.300 ug/L
;ilver U ND 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01103/13 06:34 1272960 7
~opper 10.3 10.0 10.0 ug/L SKJ 01104/13 13:48 1272960 8
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267295
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP AXG2 12/28112 1130 1272959
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP MTMI 12120112 1100 1271878
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep AXG2 12/03112 0730 1267254
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: February 7,2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-70 11282012
Sample ID: 315987013
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
28-NOV-12 10:45
30-NOV-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
~ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
::JFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U 1.00 +/-0.243
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
;uITogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.493
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDFl 12/08112 1259 1267600
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
100 (25%-125%)
;RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Semiannual Groundwater 2012
1212308-003A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 12/1212012
Received Date: 1211412012 1000h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/14/2012 1309h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: Toluene-d8
Dilution Factor:
CAS
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
55.8 50.00 112 72-151
47.8 50.00 95.6 80-128
51.3 50.00 103 80-124
47.8 50.00 95.6 77-129
Reissue of a previously generated report. The collection date has been corrected. Information herein supersedes that of previously issued
reports.
Report Date: 1212712012 Page 9 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. connection ,,:,ith the adverti~ement, promotion or sale of any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication of t~is report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Semiannual Groundwater 2012
1212130-003A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 12/5/2012
Received Date: 12/712012 1012h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/10/2012 1233h
Units: IlglL
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: Toluene-d8
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
17060-07-0 53.3 50.00 107
460-00-4 50.8 50.00 102
1868-53-7 50.8 50.00 102
2037-26-5 49.5 50.00 98.9
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 9 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useofthe name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, promotion or sale.of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication oft~isreport for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
1211436-014A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 11/26/2012
Received Date: 11130/2012 1045h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/312012 1447h
Units: IlglL
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: 1 Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 52.2 50.00 104
1868-53-7 50.4 50.00 101
460-00-4 53.8 50.00 108
17060-07-0 52.5 50.00 105
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 33 of 42
All analyses applicable to. the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfo.nned in acco.rdance to. NELAC proto.Co.ls. Pertinent sampling info.nnatio.n is lo.cated o.n the attached COCo This repo.rt is pro.vided fo.r the exclusive lise o.fthe addressee. Privileges o.f
subsequent use, o.f the name o.f this co.miJany o.r any, member o.f its staff, o.r repro.ductio.n o.f this repo.rt in, c?nnectio.n \\lith the advertisement, pro.mo.tio.n o.r sale ,o.f any pro.duct o.r process, o.r in co.nnectio.n with the re.-publicatio.n o.f t~is repo.rt fo.r any
American West
ANALY TICAL LABOilATO R1ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
1211249-011A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 11112/2012
Received Date: 11116/2012 0940h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 11116/2012 1704h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
SUIT: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
2037-26-5 48.0 50.00 96.0
1868-53-7 53.4 50.00 107
460-00-4 49.4 50.00 98.8
17060-07-0 60.2 50.00 120
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
77-129
80-124
80-128
72-151
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 27 of37
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of t~e name of this company or any. member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection v:ith the adverti~ement, pro!notion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the rc.-publication of this report for any
American West
A N ALYTICA L LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1211109-003A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 1116/2012
Received Date: 11/7/2012 1412h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 1118/2012 1023h
Units: /lg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Garrin Palmer
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Surr: Toluene-d8
Surr: Dibromotluoromethane
Surr: 4-Bromotluorobenzene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
2037-26-5
1868-53-7
460-00-4
17060-07-0
51.9
49.7
55.9
52.8
50.00 104 77-129
50.00 99.4 80-124
50.00 112 80-128
50.00 106 72-151
Report Date: 11120/2012 Page 9 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useoft~e name of this comjJany or anymember of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .ofany product or pro~ess, orin connection with the re.-publication oft~isreport for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ill: 1211109
American West Analytical Laboratories received 3 sample( s) on 1117/2012 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Association Conference (NELAC) Institute in Utah and Texas;
and is state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri. In addition,
A W AL is also accredited by the American Analytical Laboratory Association (A2LA) on
ISO IEC 17025:2005, Department of Defense (DOD), UST for theState of Wyoming, and
the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). All analyses were
performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute and/or A2LA protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions · or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
11/20/2012: This is a revision to a report originally issued 11115/2012. Pages 1, 5, 6, and
11-14 have been revised. Page 2 has been added. All pages have been updated for
pagination.
11127/2012: Pages 1, 5, 6, and 12 have been revised.
Thank You, Ky I e F ~, Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
ON: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
'ou=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G email=[e-mail]. c=US r 0 S S -, Date: 2012.1 ~.28 06:47:44 -07'00'
Approved by: ~ ______________________ ~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 11127/2012 Page 1 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of t~e name of this comj>any or any. member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection \\lith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
A N ALYTICAL LABORATOR IES Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Set ID: 1211109
Date Received: 11/7/20121412h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1211109-001A MW-31 11062012 1116/2012 1345h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 8260C/5030C
1211109-001B MW-31 11062012 1116/2012 1345h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211109-001B MW-31 11062012 111612012 1345h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Phone: [phone] 1211109-001C MW-31 11062012 1116/2012 1345h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Toll Free: [phone] 1211109-001D MW-31 11062012 1116/2012 1345h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
Fax: [phone] 1211109-001D MW-31 11062012 1116/2012 1345h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
;:-mail: [e-mail] 1211109-002A MW-32 11062012 1116/2012 1330h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
web: www.awal-Iabs.com 1211109-002B MW-32 11062012 1116/2012 1330h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211109-002B MW-32 11062012 111612012 1330h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211109-002C MW-32 11062012 111612012 1330h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Kyle F. Gross 1211109-002D MW-32 11062012 1116/2012 1330h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
Laboratory Director 1211109-002D MW-32 11062012 1116/2012 1330h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211109-003A Trip Blank 1116/2012 Aqueous VOA by GCIMS ,Method
Jose Rocha 8260C/5030C
QA Officer
Report Date: 11120/2012 Page 2 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this com~any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of thi~ report in, c~nnection \\,ith th~ adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re,-publication of this. report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
1211109
1117/2012
1116/2012
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Duplicates (DUP): The parameters that require a duplicate analysis had RPD's
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 11120/2012 Page 3 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c~nnection \\,ith the adverti~ement, promotion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~isreport for any
Volatile Case Narrative
American West Client: ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
;:-rnail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
1211109
11/7/2012
1116/2012
Intact
None
SW -846 8260CIS030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: No target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exception: The RPD on naphthalene was high for sample 1211109-001A
due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 11/20/2012 Page 4 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. connection ",:ith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~is report for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211109
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1211109-002CDUP Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
mgIL SM2540C
Result
3,680
Amount
Spiked
Dept: WC
QC Type: DUP
Original
Amount
3,572
%REC Limits %RPD
3.09
RPD
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Limit Qual Date Analyzed
5 1119/2012 1350h
Report Date: 11120/2012 Page 10 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATOR IES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211109
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS-R47445 Chloride
LCS-R47445 Fluoride
LCS-R47445 Sulfate
LCS-R47485 Alkalinity (as CaC03)
LCS-22201 Ammonia (as N)
LCS-R47399 NitratelNitrite (as N)
LCS-R47369 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 4.72 5.000 0 94.4 90-110
mg/L E300.0 4.90 5.000 0 98.0 90-110
mg/L E300.0 4.73 5.000 0 94.6 90-110
mg/L SM2320B 52,800 50,000 0 106 90-110
mg/L E350.1 1.05 1.000 0 105 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.06 1.000 0 106 90-110
mg/L SM2540C 188 205.0 0 91.7 80-120
/\ -Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
RPD
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
/\
11112/2012 2259h
11112/2012 2259h
11112/2012 2259h
11/15/2012 1000h
1111312012 1957h
11/1212012 1848h
11/9/2012 1350h
Report Date: 11/20/2012 Page 11 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LAB ORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211109
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB-R47445 Chloride
MB-R47445 Fluoride
MB-R47445 Sulfate
MB-R47485 Bicarbonate (as CaC03)
MB-R47485 Carbonate (as CaC03)
MB-22201 Ammonia (as N)
MB-R47399 NitratelNitrite (as N)
MB-R47369 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mgIL E300.0 < 1.00
mgIL E300.0 < 0.100
mgIL E300.0 < 1.00
mgIL SM2320B < 1.00
mgIL SM2320B < 1.00
mgIL E350.1 < 0.0500
mg/L E353.2 < 0.100
mgIL SM2540C < 10.0
A _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
11/1212012 2235h
1111212012 2235h
11/12/2012 2235h
A 11/15/2012 1000h
A 1111512012 1000h
11113/2012 1955h
11 112/20 12 1846h
1119/2012 1350h
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the fe-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211109
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1211109-001BMS Chloride
1211109-001BMS Fluoride
1211109-001BMS Sulfate
1211109-001BMS Alkalinity (as CaC03)
1211109-001DMS Ammonia (as N)
1211109-002DMS NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, ur 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mgIL E300.0 4,810 5,000 189.0 92.4 90-110
mgIL E300.0 4,790 5,000 3.872 95.8 90-110
mgIL E300.0 5,330 5,000 557.0 95.6 90-110
mgIL SM2320B 222 50.00 171.8 100 80-120
mglL E350.1 1.04 1.000 0 104 90-110
mgIL E353.2 1.02 1.000 0.01420 101 90-110
1\ _ Reissue of a previously gen~rated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
11/1312012 0704h
11/13/2012 0704h
11113/2012 0704h
1\ 1111512012 1000h
11113/20122010h
11/12/2012 1901h
Report Date: 11/20/2012 Page 13 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211109
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
l2lll09-001BMSD Chloride
l21l109-001BMSD Fluoride
12l1109-001BMSD Sulfate
1211109-001BMSD Alkalinity (as CaC03)
1211109-001DMSD Ammonia (as N)
1211109-002DMSD Nitrate/Nitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
OC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 4,940 5,000 189.0 95.0 90-110
mg/L E300.0 4,940 5,000 3.872 98.8 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5,300 5,000 557.0 94.8 90-110
mg/L SM2320B 224 50.00 171.8 104 80-120
mglL E350.1 1.00 1.000 0 100 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.02 1.000 0.01420 101 90-110
/\ -Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
%RPD
2.71
3.09
0.736
0.808
3.12
0.107
RPD
Limit
20
20
20
10
10
10
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
11113/2012 0817h
11113/2012 0817h
11113/2012 0817h
/\ 11/15/2012 1000h
11113/20122016h
11/1212012 1903h
Report Date: 1112012012 Page 14 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANA LYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211109
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS VOC 110812A Benzene
LCS VOC 110812A Chloroform
LCS VOC 110812A Methylene chloride
LCS VOC 110812A Naphthalene
LCS VOC 110812A Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 110812A Toluene
LCS VOC 110812A Xylenes, Total
LCS VOC 110812A SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
LCS VOC 110812A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 110812A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 110812A SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
JlglL SW8260C 21.2 20.00 0 106 62-127
JlglL SW8260C 21.1 20.00 0 106 67-132
JlglL SW8260C 21.1 20.00 0 105 32-185
JlglL SW8260C 13.6 20.00 0 68.2 28-136
JlglL SW8260C 16.7 20.00 0 83.7 43-146
JlglL SW8260C 20.7 20.00 0 104 64-128
JlglL SW8260C 59.9 60.00 0 99.8 52-134
%REC SW8260C 53.1 50.00 106 76-138
%REC SW8260C 48.2 50.00 96.3 77-121
%REC SW8260C 50.6 50.00 101 67-128
%REC SW8260C 48.9 50.00 97.8 81-135
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
11/812012 0848h
11/8/2012 0848h
11/8/2012 0848h
1118/2012 0848h
11/8/2012 0848h
11/8/2012 0848h
111812012 0848h
111812012 0848h
1118/2012 0848h
111812012 0848h
1118/2012 0848h
Report Date: 11/20/2012 Page 15 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORlES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211109
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 110812A 2-Butanone
MB VOC 110812A Acetone
MB VOC 110812A Benzene
MB VOC 110812A Carbon tetrachloride
MB VOC 110812A Chloroform
MB VOC 110812A Chloromethane
MB VOC 110812A Methylene chloride
MB VOC 110812A Naphthalene
MB VOC 110812A Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 110812A Toluene
MB VOC 110812A Xylenes, Total
MB VOC 110812A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 110812A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 110812A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 110812A Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: (888) 263 -8686, Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
g SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Gaffin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlgfL SW8260C <20.0
IlgfL SW8260C <20.0
IlgfL SW8260C < 1.00
IlgfL SW8260C < 1.00
IlgfL SW8260C < 1.00
IlgfL SW8260C < 1.00
IlgfL SW8260C < 1.00
IlgfL SW8260C < 1.00
IlgfL SW8260C < 1.00
IlgfL SW8260C < 1.00
IlgfL SW8260C < 1.00
%REC SW8260C 54.7 50.00 109 76-138
%REC SW8260C 54.3 50.00 109 77-121
%REC SW8260C 51.0 50.00 102 67-128
%REC SW8260C 52.0 50.00 104 81-135
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1118/2012 0926h
1118/2012 0926h
1118/2012 0926h
1118/2012 0926h
11/8/2012 0926h
11/8/2012 0926h
1118/2012 0926h
1118/2012 0926h
111812012 0926h
1118/2012 0926h
11/8/2012 0926h
111812012 0926h
1118/2012 0926h
1118/2012 0926h
1118/2012 0926h
Report Date: 11/20/2012 Page 16 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached cae. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATOR IES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211109
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1211109-001AMS Benzene
1211109-001AMS Chloroform
1211109-001AMS Methylene chloride
1211 109-00 1 AMS Naphthalene
1211109-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
1211 109-00 lAMS Toluene
1211109-001AMS Xylene&, Total
1211109-001AMS Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1211109-001AMS Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1211109-001AMS Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
1211 109-00 1 AMS Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
JlglL SW8260C 16.9 20.00 0 84.6 66-145
JlglL SW8260C 17.0 20.00 0 85.0 50-146
JlglL SW8260C 17.5 20.00 0 87.7 30-192
JlglL SW8260C 10.6 20.00 0 53.0 41-l31
JlglL SW8260C l3.4 20.00 0 67.2 43-146
JlglL SW8260C 17.0 20.00 0 85.0 18-192
JlglL SW8260C 49.4 60.00 0 82.3 42-167
%REC SW8260C 52.8 50.00 106 72-151
%REC SW8260C 49.0 50.00 98.1 80-128
%REC SW8260C 49.9 50.00 99.8 80-124
%REC SW8260C 49.0 50.00 97.9 77-129
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1118/2012 1042h
1118/2012 1042h
111812012 1042h
11/8/2012 1042h
1118/2012 1042h
11/8/2012 1042h
1118/2012 1042h
11/8/2012 1042h
11/8/2012 1042h
11/8/2012 1042h
11/8/2012 1042h
Report Date: 11 120/20 12 Page 17 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICA L LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211109
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
SampleID Analyte
1211109-001AMSD Benzene
1211109-001AMSD Chloroform
1211109-001AMSD Methylene chloride
1211109-001AMSD Naphthalene
1211109-001AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
1211109-001AMSD Toluene
1211109-001AMSD Xylenes, Total
1211109-001AMSD SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1211109-001AMSD SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1211109-001AMSD SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1211109-001AMSD SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
~glL SW8260C 21.7 20.00 0 108 66-145
~glL SW8260C 21.6 20.00 0 108 50-146
~glL SW8260C 22.4 20.00 0 112 30-192
~glL SW8260C 14.0 20.00 0 70.2 41-131
~glL SW8260C 13.6 20.00 0 68.0 43-146
~glL SW8260C 21.5 20.00 0 108 18-192
~glL SW8260C 61.9 60.00 0 103 42-167
%REC SW8260C 53.6 50.00 107 72-151
%REC SW8260C 49.5 50.00 98.9 80-128
%REC SW8260C 51.0 50.00 102 80-124
%REC SW8260C 49.3 50.00 98.5 77-129
@ -High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference.
%RPD
24.7
23.9
24.6
27.8
1.11
23.4
22.5
RPD
Limit
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1118/2012 1101h
11/812012 1101h
11/8/2012 1101h
@ 1118/2012 1101h
111812012 1101h
11/8/2012 1101h
11/8/2012 1101h
1118/2012 1101h
11/812012 1101h
1118/2012 1101h
1118/2012 1101h
Report Date: 11/20/2012 Page 18 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the nam~ of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
WORK ORDER Summary , Work Order: 1211109
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 1 of 1 1118/2012
Client ID: DENIOO Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012 QC Level: LEVEL III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 & Summary. EDD-Denison. CC [e-mail].;
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sei Storage
1211109~00IA MW-3 1-11 062012 1116/2012 134511 11/7/2012141211 1111612012 Aqueous 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211109-001B 300.0-W ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK~W-2320B ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: ALKD ALKC
1211109-001C TDS-W-2540C ~ ww-tds
SEL AnaJytes: TDS
1211109-001D NH3-W-350.l ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NH3N
SEL AnaJytes: N03N02N
nh3/n02/00
3
NH3-W-PR D df-
nh3/n02/00
3
N02IN03-W-~ df-
353.2 nh3/1102/no
3
1211109-002A MW-32-11062012 11/6/2012 1330118260-W IilI VOCFridge 3
1211109-002B 300.0-W ~ df -we
SELAnalytes: CL._F_S_0_4 ________________________________________ = ___ .
--ALK-W-2320B ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211109-002C TDS-W-2540C IilI ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1211109-002D -NH3-W-350.l ~ df-
SEL AnaJytes: NlI3N
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
nh3/1102/110
3
NH3-W-PR D df-
llh3/n02/00
3
N02IN03-W -~ df -
353.2 I1h3/002/00
3
1211109-003A Trip Blaok 1116/2012 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M --r::f RT ~ CN a TAT JZ( QC--r:J HOK__ HOK__ HOK__ COC Emailed
Client 'e.I'e.("o..~ lv.e\~ ,\=:::J
Address b~2S S Uw·.}.. )4l , ::::::s ~l&\Y)A;n~ V\\ Kl...)S))
City-J State ZIp
Phone 43S f-7g .2.22.\ Fax:....-. ____ _
-----------, " , Po-.\ , __ ,Mt:.,r'
E-mail .5 PoJWler @ eYH~r~~c\.<,>.l...O\Y\
ProjecfName '>ero'\ ~tHlill~l G-rDV\f\~ V\lo:..t-er ~o 'l
Project Number/P,Q.#
Sampler Name~l'Iner tt~lI ;40~
Sample 10
AW-~\_ ilO'2C1'2
M\N -.32 .11 Db"") 6)2.
Ir;Q Ri6,-,,,,k
.~
'-G,. I r' I ~ I Oi VI ~
OatelTime
Collected
X ·c -+J m ~
Il/bb ... b\?. r~i..p; W
11/'/20\"<" t33D vJ
'1/~/20}2... vJ
-' , -. 'J
'11///;""'-'1 1:-vv
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
CHAIN OF
CUSTODY
463 West 3600 South [phone]
[phone]
Salt Lake City, Utah Fax [phone]
84115 Email:[e-mail]
TESTS REQUIRED
G r;; f(.Q (' r' ~ ! ci . .0 i=\ t.. r'l. G ~ ~ (,0 0.-~ L t. ~ ~ °0 >....:.J ! iJ1 0 .() <0 .-e -6 ~'~ CJ~ O~ ~ <) 'v ;::r ;::> ~ • ..,9 I \I) Ot.-:e u ~ ~ d 0 .~ 00 'cD '0 ~ ~ 1.11 (jj <-'-.. 0 " .~ -I' ~:r .0 -l ~ '/\ r£J. § :z 'v ~ C .-l ,0 P' z (.) '" .-:t <-'< -:> w: \-~ \J
" l-'" 'j 'f' ''{-y, 7' '{..
b r, .", y .. ''/-X 'f f-'r
X
Relinquished By: Signature II /I/:/. Date Rece~g1t~ t~1 h D~r :/1' Special Instructions: _~ 1?A.fL0t..... . 1 Il/7/20l'). ht "2-
PRINT NAME j
Timr412 PRINT N~hp V rlv+f Ti~ \ ~12
Relinquished By: Signature Date Received By: Signature Date
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME Time
Relinquished By: Signature Date Received By: Signature Date
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME Time
Relinquished By: Signature Date Received By: Signature Date
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME Time
Lab Sample Set #
·Page~
)'2 1 1 100[
of _-!-__ _
Turn Around Time (Circle One)
1 day 2 day 3 day 4 day 5 dayC!~ndav
QC LEVEL LABORATORY USE ONLY
SAMPLES~ ~ ~ 1 Shipped hand delivered 1 2 2+ Notes: ___ -
0 2 Ambient~ 3+ 4 Notes:
3 Temperature E.:L
COMMENTS 4 Received Broken/leaking
(Improperly seV Y N
Notes:
5 ~erlY Preserved
Y N
Checked at Bench
Y N
Notes:
6 Beceived Within cngr1lt1es
Y -N
N :
COC Tape Was:
1 Present on Outer ~
Package ~" Y N
'-.-)
2 Unbroken on Outer ___
Package C: Y N
3 Present on Sample ~
Y N NA "-
4 Unbroken on samplee
Y N NA
Discrepancies Between
Sample Labels and (£) Record? .
Y N
Notes:
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &N03
Nutrients
0&0
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOe
TOX
TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
S Ie Set E
Preservative All E~fll _F 'l"
OK I 1 __
pH <2 1-12S04 J/-eC' Vcr
pH <2 H2SO4 I (
PH >12 NaOH
pH <2 HN03
pH <2 H2SO4 Y--e-; y~
pH <2 H2SO4
,
pH <2 HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH> 9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H3P04
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 HeL
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
'''I-''
-----.. -
c./\.vt::fl' r:. ,-1\ .. ,,1-" LA"'" I-' ,
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag eoe, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on cae
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
Sample Set: I?.. / { /0 r
t=xcepI r. ~t c./\. .. " 1-" ~ 10;/1-
I
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-rnai1: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ill: 1211249
American West Analytical Laboratories received 11 sample(s) on 11116/2012 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Association Conference (NELAC) Institute in Utah and Texas;
and is state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri. In addition,
A W AL is also accredited by the American Analytical Laboratory Association (A2LA) on
ISO IEC 17025:2005, Department of Defense (DOD), UST for the State of Wyoming, and
the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). All analyses were
performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute and/or A2LA protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The· abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You, Ky I e F. Digitally Signed by Kyle F. Gross
DN: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G email=[e-mail]. c=US r 055 Date: 2012.11.29 16:22:25 -07'00'
Approved by: ~ ______________________ ~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 1 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of t~e name of this comp'any or any. member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ~ith the advertisement, pro,motion or sale .of any product or pro?ess, or in connection with the re,-publication of this report for any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANALYTICA l. LAB ORATORIES Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Set ID: 1211249
Date Received: 111l6/20120940h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South 1211249-001A 11W-11 11122012 11112/2012 1330h Aqueous VOA by GC/11S 11ethod
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 8260C/5030C
1211249-001B 11W-11 11122012 11112/2012 1330h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211249-001B 11W-11 11122012 11112/2012 1330h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
Phone: [phone] 1211249-001C 11W-11 11122012 11112/2012 1330h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Toll Free: [phone] 1211249-001D 11W-11 11122012 11112/2012 1330h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: [phone] 1211249-001D 11W-11 11122012 11112/2012 1330h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
~-rnail: [e-mail] 1211249-002A 11W-15 11142012 11114/2012 1235h Aqueous VOA by GCMS 11ethod
8260C/5030C
web: www.awal-labs.com 1211249-002B 11W-15 11142012 11114/2012 1235h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211249-002B 11W-15 11142012 11114/2012 1235h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211249-002C 11W-15 11142012 11114/2012 1235h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Kyle F. Gross 1211249-002D 11W-15 11142012 11114/2012 1235h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Laboratory Director 1211249-002D 11W-15 11142012 11114/2012 1235h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1211249-003A 11W-25 11122012 11112/2012 1308h Aqueous VOA by GC/11S 11ethod
Jose Rocha 8260C/5030C
QA Officer 1211249-003B 11W-25 11122012 11112/2012 1308h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211249-003B 11W-25 11122012 11112/2012 1308h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211249-003C 11W-25 11122012 11112/2012 1308h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
1211249-003D 11W-25 11122012 11112/2012 1308h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1211249-003D 11W-25 11122012 11112/2012 1308h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211249-004A 11W-26 11152012 11/15/2012 0730h Aqueous VOA by GCMS 11ethod
8260C/5030C
1211249-004B 11W-26 11152012 11115/2012 0730h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211249-004B 11W-26 11152012 11115/2012 0730h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211249-004C 11W-26 11152012 11115/2012 0730h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
1211249-004D 11W-26 11152012 11/15/2012 0730h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211249-004D 11W-26 11152012 11115/2012 0730h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1211249-005A 11W-27 11132012 11113/2012 1305h Aqueous VOA by GCMS 11ethod
8260C/5030C
1211249-005B 11W-27 11132012 11113/2012 1305h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211249-005B 11W-27 11132012 11113/2012 1305h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
Report Date: 1112912012 Page 2 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useofthe name of this comp'any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection v:ith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication oft?is report for any
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
American West Lab Set ID: 1211249
ANALY TIC AL LABORATORIES Date Received: 11116/20120940h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
1211249-005C MW-27 11132012 1111312012 1305h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
463 West 3600 South 1211249-005D MW-27 11132012 1111312012 1305h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 1211249-005D MW-27 11132012 ' 1111312012 1305h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211249-006A MW-28 11142012 1111412012 1100h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
1211249-006B MW-28 11142012 1111412012 1100h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Phone: [phone] 1211249-006B MW~28 11142012 1111412012 1100h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
Toll Free: [phone] 1211249-006C MW-28 11142012 1111412012 1100h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Fax: [phone] 1211249-006D MW-28 11142012 1111412012 1100h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
~-mail: [e-mail] 1211249-006D MW-28 11142012 11114/2012 1100h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1211249-007A MW-29 11142012 1111412012 1350h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
web: www.awal-Iabs.com 8260C/5030C
1211249-007B MW-29 11142012 11114/2012 1350h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211249-007B MW-29 11142012 11114/2012 1350h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Kyle F. Gross Carbonate, A2320B
1211249-007C MW-29 11142012 11114/2012 1350h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Laboratory Director 1211249-007D MW-29 11142012 11114/2012 1350h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211249-007D MW-29 11142012 11114/2012 1350h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
Jose Rocha 1211249-008A MW-30 11132012 11/13/2012 1140h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
QA Officer 8260C/5030C
1211249-008B MW-30 11132012 11113/2012 1140h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211249-008B MW-30 11132012 11113/2012 1140h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211249-008C MW-30 11132012 11113/2012 1140h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
1211249-008D MW-30 11132012 11113/2012 1140h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211249-008D MW-30 11132012 1111312012 1140h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1211249-009A MW-35 11132012 11113/2012 1345h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1211249-009B MW-35 11132012 1111312012 1345h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211249-009B MW-35 11132012 11113/2012 1345h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211249-009C MW-35 11132012 11113/2012 1345h , Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
1211249-009D MW-35 11132012 11113/2012 1345h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211249-009D MW-35 1113201V 11113/2012 1345h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1211249-010A MW-36 11142012 11114/2012 0900h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1211249-010B MW-36 11142012 11114/2012 0900h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 3 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e name of this comp'any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro~ess, orin connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
;:-rnail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
1211249
Date Received: 11116/20120940h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
1211249-010B MW-36 11142012
1211249-010C MW-36 11142012
1211249-010D MW-36 11142012
1211249-010D MW-36 11142012
1211249-011A Trip Blank
Date Collected
1111412012 0900h
11/14/2012 0900h
11/1412012 0900h
11/14/2012 0900h
1111212012
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Matrix Analysis
Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 4 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SOW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use oft~e name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ""ith the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
Inorganic Case Narrative
American West Client: ANALY TICAL LABORA TOR I ES Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
1211249
11116/2012
11112 -11115/2012
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicates (MSIMSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions: The MS and MSD percent recoveries were outside of control
limits on ammonia for sample 1211249-007D due to sample matrix interference.
Duplicates (DUP): The parameters that require a duplicate analysis had RPD's
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 11/29/2012 Page 5 of37
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in. connection \\lith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale of any product or pro~ess, or in connection with the re.~publication of this report for any
Volatile Case Narrative
American West Client: J\,NALYTICAL LABORATORIES Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
1211249
11116/2012
11112 -11115/2012
See Chain of Custody
None
SW -846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: One sample exhibited multiple target analytes above reporting
limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 6 of37
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use, of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in, c?nnection v:ith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale ,of any product or process, or in connection with the re:publication of t?is report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATOR IES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211249
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID
1211249-001CDUP
1211249-002CDUP
Analyte
Total Dissolved Solids
Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80l) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units
mgIL
Method
SM2540C
SM2540C
Result
2,000
3,740
Amount
Spiked
Dept: WC
QC Type: DUP
Original
Amount
2,048
3,812
%REC Limits %RPD
2.37
1.91
RPD
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Limit Qual Date Analyzed
5
5
11116/2012 1240h
11/16/2012 1240h
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 28 of37
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTIC AL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211249
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS-R47743 Fluoride
LCS-R47743 Sulfate
LCS-R47780 Chloride
LCS-R47780 Sulfate
LCS-R47571 Alkalinity (as CaC03)
LCS-22326 Ammonia (as N)
LCS-R47563 NitratelNitrite (as N)
LCS-R47600 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY_REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mgIL E300.0 5.01 5.000 0 100 90-110
mgIL E300.0 4.90 5.000 0 97.9 90-110
mgIL E300.0 5.27 5.000 0 105 90-110
mgIL E300.0 5.35 5.000 0 107 90-110
mgIL SM2320B 50,100 50,000 0 100 90-110
mgIL E350.1 1.10 1.000 0 110 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.02 1.000 0 102 90-110
mgIL SM2540C 192 205.0 0 93.7 80-120
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1112112012 0401h
1112112012 0401h
1112612012 1205h
11126/2012 1205h
11119/20120643h
11 120120 12 1809h
1111612012 1642h
11/1612012 1240h
Report Date: 1112912012 Page 29 of37
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SOW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATOR IES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211249
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB-R47743 Fluoride
MB-R47743 Sulfate
MB-R47780 Chloride
MB-R47780 Sulfate
MB-R47571 Bicarbonate (as CaC03)
MB-R47571 Carbonate (as CaC03)
MB-22326 Ammonia (as N)
MB-R47563 NitratelNitrite (as N)
MB-R47600 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 <0.100
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00
mg/L SM2320B < 1.00
mg/L SM2320B < 1.00
mg/L E350.1 < 0.0500
mgIL E353.2 < 0.100
mg/L SM2540C < 10.0
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha -
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1112112012 0340h
1112112012 0340h
11126/2012 1143h
11126/2012 1143h
11119/20120643h
11119/2012 0643h
11 120/20 12 1807h
11116/2012 1641h
11116/2012 1240h
Report Date: 1112912012 Page 30 of37
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTI CAL LABORATOR IES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211249
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1211249-001BMS Fluoride
1211249-001BMS Sulfate
1211249-001BMS Chloride
1211249-001BMS Sulfate
1211249-001BMS Alkalinity (as CaC03)
1211249-001DMS Ammonia (as N)
1211249-007DMS Ammonia (as N)
1211249-001DMS NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~_C_SllMMARY REPORT __
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mglL E300.0 4,940 5,000 3.855 98.8 90-110
mglL E300.0 5,760 5,000 1,114 92.8 90-110
mgIL E300.0 4,790 5,000 22.68 95.3 90-110
mglL E300.0 5,750 5,000 1,094 93.2 90-110
mglL SM2320B 354 50.00 305.2 96.6 80-120
mgIL E350.1 1.72 1.000 0.6901 103 90-110
mglL E350.1 1.46 1.000 0.6348 82.6 90-110
mglL E353.2 0.982 1.000 0.01210 96.9 90-110
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix inteiference. The method is in control as indicated by the Les.
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1112112012 0505h
1112112012 0505h
1112612012 1251h
11126/2012 1251h
11119120120643h
11120/2012 1811h
11 120/20 12 1824h
11/16/2012 1716h
Report Date: 1112912012 Page 31 of37
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL L ABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211249
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1211249-001 BMSD Fluoride
1211249-001BMSD Sulfate
1211249-001 BMSD Chloride
1211249-001 BMSD Sulfate
1211249-001 BMSD Alkalinity (as CaC03)
1211249-001DMSD Ammonia (as N)
1211249-007DMSD Ammonia (as N)
1211249-001 DMSD NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
_QC S1lMMARYBJ>OBT_
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mgIL E300.0 4,980 5,000 3.855 99.5 90-110
mglL E300.0 5,860 5,000 1,114 95.0 90-110
mglL E300.0 4,780 5,000 22.68 95.1 90-110
mgIL E300.0 5,700 5,000 1,094 92.1 90-110
mglL SM2320B 354 50.00 305.2 98.4 80-120
mgIL E350.1 1.72 1.000 0.6901 103 90-110
mgIL E350.1 1.50 1.000 0.6348 86.5 90-110
mgIL E353.2 1.01 1.000 0.01210 100 90-110
1 _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the Les.
%RPD
0.733
1.84
0.287
0.254
0.25
2.62
3.13
RPD
Limit
20
20
20
20
10
10
10
10
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1112112012 0526h
1112112012 0526h
11126/2012 1312h
11126/2012 1312h
11119/20120643h
11120/2012 1812h
11120/2012 1825h
11116/2012 1717h
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 32 of37
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached coc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with tlie advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West _Q{:~UMMARY REPO&~_ ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1211249 Dept: MSVOA
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012 QC Type: LCS
Amount Original RPD
Sample ID Analyte Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits %RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
LCS VOC 111612A Benzene JlglL SW8260C 19.9 20.00 0 99.6 62-127 11116/20120716h
LCS VOC 111612A Chloroform JlglL SW8260C 21.2 20.00 0 106 67-132 11/16/20120716h
LCS VOC 111612A Methylene chloride JlglL SW8260C 20.9 20.00 0 104 32-185 11116120120716h
LCS VOC 111612A Naphthalene JlglL SW8260C 18.1 20.00 0 90.3 28-136 11116/20120716h
LCS VOC 111612A Tetrahydrofuran JlglL SW8260C 16.8 20.00 0 83.8 43-146 11116120120716h
LCS VOC 111612A Toluene JlglL SW8260C 19.3 20.00 0 96.4 64-128 11116/20120716h
LCS VOC 111612A Xylenes, Total JlglL SW8260C 57.9 60.00 0 96.5 52-134 11/16/2012 0716h
LCS VOC 111612A SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 %REC SW8260C 54.9 50.00 110 76-138 1111612012 0716h
LCS VOC 111612A SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene %REC SW8260C 49.9 50.00 99.9 77-121 11116/20120716h
LCS VOC 111612A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane %REC SW8260C 53.2 50.00 106 67-128 11116120120716h
LCS VOC 111612A SUIT: Toluene-d8 %REC SW8260C 48.0 50.00 96.0 81-135 11116/20120716h
LCS VOC 112012A Benzene JlglL SW8260C 21.5 20.00 0 108 62-127 11120/2012 0823h
LCS VOC 112012A Chloroform JlglL SW8260C 22.4 20.00 0 112 67-132 11120/2012 0823h
LCS VOC 112012A Methylene chloride JlglL SW8260C 23.6 20.00 0 118 32-185 11/20120120823h
LCS VOC 112012A Naphthalene JlglL SW8260C 19.6 20.00 0 97.9 28-136 11120/20120823h
LCS VOC 112012A Tetrahydrofuran JlglL SW8260C 17.9 20.00 0 89.4 43-146 11120/2012 0823h
LCS VOC 112012A Toluene JlglL SW8260C 21.6 20.00 0 108 64-128 11120/2012 0823h
LCS VOC 112012A Xylenes, Total JlglL SW8260C 65.8 60.00 0 110 52-134 11120/2012 0823h
LCS VOC 112012A SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 %REC SW8260C 52.3 50.00 105 76-138 1112012012 0823h
LCS VOC 112012A SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene %REC SW8260C 48.9 50.00 97.8 77-121 1112012012 0823h
LCS VOC 112012A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane %REC SW8260C 51.7 50.00 103 67-128 11120/2012 0823h
LCS VOC 112012A SUIT: Toluene-d8 %REC SW8260C 48.3 50.00 96.5 81-135 1112012012 0823h
Report Date: 11/2912012 Page 33 of37
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATOR IES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211249
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 111612A 2-Butanone
MB VOC 111612A Acetone
MB VOC 111612A Benzene
MB VOC 111612A Carbon tetrachloride
MB VOC 111612A Chloroform
MB VOC 111612A Chloromethane
MB VOC 111612A Methylene chloride
MB VOC 111612A Naphthalene
MB VOC 111612A Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 111612A Toluene
MB VOC 111612A Xylenes, Total
MB VOC 111612A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 111612A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 111612A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 111612A Surr: Toluene-d8
MB VOC 112012A 2-Butanone
MB VOC 112012A Acetone
MB VOC 112012A Benzene
MB VOC 112012A Carbon tetrachloride
MB VOC 112012A Chloroform
MB VOC 112012A Chloromethane
MB VOC 112012A Methylene chloride
MB VOC 112012A Naphthalene
MB VOC 112012A Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 112012A Toluene
MB VOC 112012A Xylenes, Total
MB VOC 112012A Surr: 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
_Q!: BlIMMARY_RE~O&T __
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
JlglL SW8260C <20.0
JlglL SW8260C <20.0
JlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
JlglL SW8260C < 1.00
JlglL SW8260C < 1.00
JlglL SW8260C < 1.00
JlglL SW8260C < 1.00
JlglL SW8260C < 1.00
JlglL SW8260C < 1.00
JlglL SW8260C < 1.00
%REC SW8260C 58.7 50.00 117 76-138
%REC SW8260C 48.4 50.00 96.8 77-121
%REC SW8260C 54.0 50.00 108 67-128
%REC SW8260C 48.6 50.00 97.2 81-135
JlglL SW8260C < 10.0
JlglL SW8260C < 10.0
JlglL SW8260C <2.00
JlglL SW8260C <2.00
JlglL SW8260C <2.00
JlglL SW8260C < 3.00
JlglL SW8260C <2.00
JlglL SW8260C <2.00
JlglL SW8260C <2.00
JlglL SW8260C <2.00
JlglL SW8260C <2.00
%REC SW8260C 53.2 50.00 106 76-138
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
11116/2012 0754h
1111612012 0754h
11116/2012 0754h
11116/2012 0754h
11116/2012 0754h
11116/2012 0754h
1111612012 0754h
11116/2012 0754h
11116/2012 0754h
11116/2012 0754h
11116/2012 0754h
1111612012 0754h
11/16/2012 0754h
11116/20120754h
11116/2012 0754h
11120120120901h
11120/2012 0901h
1112012012 0901 h
11120/2012 0901 h
11120/2012 0901 h
11120/2012 0901h
1112012012 0901h
11120/2012 0901 h
11120/2012 0901h
1112012012 0901h
11120120120901h
1112012012 0901h
Report Date: 11/29/2012 Page 34 of37
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYrt CAL LABORATORIE S
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211249
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 112012A SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 112012A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 112012A SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY_RE_PQRT_
Contact: Gaffin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
%REC SW8260C 50.5 50.00 101 77-121
%REC SW8260C 50.5 50.00 101 67-128
%REC SW8260C 49.5 50.00 99.0 81-135
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
11120/2012 0901 h
11120/2012 0901 h
11120/2012 0901 h
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 35 of37
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (801) 263~8687 Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West ~C SUMMARY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1211249 Dept: MSVOA
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012 QC Type: MS
Amount Original RPD
Sample ID Analyte Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits %RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
1211249-001AMS Benzene JlglL SW8260C 20.8 20.00 0 104 66-145 11116/2012 1354h
1211249-001AMS Chloroform JlglL SW8260C 21.2 20.00 0 106 50-146 1111612012 1354h
1211249-001AMS Methylene chloride JlglL SW8260C 19.9 20.00 0 99.4 30-192 1111612012 1354h
1211249-001AMS Naphthalene JlglL SW8260C 18.5 20.00 0 92.3 41-131 11116/2012 1354h
1211249-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran JlglL SW8260C 18.8 20.00 0 93.8 43-146 1111612012 1354h
1211249-001AMS Toluene JlglL SW8260C 20.9 20.00 0 105 18-192 1111612012 1354h
1211249-001AMS Xylenes, Total JlglL SW8260C 61.8 60.00 0 103 42-167 11116/2012 1354h
1211249-001AMS SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 %REC SW8260C 52.8 50.00 106 72-151 11/1612012 1354h
1211249-001AMS SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene %REC SW8260C 50.1 50.00 100 80-128 11/1612012 1354h
1211249-001AMS SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane %REC SW8260C 51.8 50.00 104 80-124 11/1612012 1354h
1211249-001AMS SUIT: Toluene-d8 %REC SW8260C 49.7 50.00 99.5 77-129 11/1612012 1354h
1211249-004AMS Benzene JlglL SW8260C 2,200 2,000 0 110 66-145 11120/2012 1055h
1211249-004AMS Chloroform JlglL SW8260C 6,480 2,000 4,022 123 50-146 11120/2012 1055h
1211249-004AMS Methylene chloride JlglL SW8260C 2,420 2,000 34.63 119 30-192 11/20/2012 1055h
1211249-004AMS Naphthalene JlglL SW8260C 2,090 2,000 0 105 41-131 11/20/2012 1055h
1211249-004AMS Tetrahydrofuran JlglL SW8260C 1,990 2,000 0 99.6 43-146 1112012012 1055h
1211249-004AMS Toluene JlglL SW8260C 2,140 2,000 0 107 18-192 1112012012 1055h
1211249-004AMS Xylenes, Total JlglL SW8260C 6,510 6,000 0 109 42-167 11120/2012 1055h
1211249-004AMS SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 %REC SW8260C 5,420 5,000 108 72-151 1112012012 1055h
1211249-004AMS SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene %REC SW8260C 4,940 5,000 98.9 80-128 1112012012 1055h
1211249-004AMS SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane %REC SW8260C 5,290 5,000 106 80-124 1112012012 1055h
1211249-004AMS SUIT: Toluene-d8 %REC SW8260C 4,830 5,000 96.6 77-129 1112012012 1055h
Report Date: 11129/2012 Page 36 of37
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This .company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West _Q!:~!LMMARY REPO&I_ NALYTiCAL LA80RATOR I ES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1211249 Dept: MSVOA
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012 QC Type: MSD
Amount-Original RPD
Sample ID Analyte Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Linrl.ts %RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
1211249-001AMSD Benzene J..lglL SW8260C 20.5 20.00 0 103 66-145 1.31 25 11116/2012 1413h
1211249-001 AMSD Chloroform J..lglL SW8260C 20.9 20.00 0 105 50-146 1.09 25 11116/2012 1413h
1211249-001AMSD Methylene chloride J..lglL SW8260C 19.9 20.00 0 99.7 30-192 0.201 25 1111612012 1413h
1211249-001 AMSD Naphthalene J..lglL SW8260C 18.3 20.00 0 91.3 41-131 1.09 25 11116/2012 1413h
1211249-001 AMSD Tetrahydrofuran J..lglL SW8260C 23.6 20.00 0 118 43-146 22.9 25 11116/2012 1413h
1211249-001AMSD Toluene J..lglL SW8260C 20.2 20.00 0 101 18-192 3.75 25 11116/2012 . 1413h
1211249-001AMSD Xylenes, Total J..lglL SW8260C 60.1 60.00 0 100 42-167 2.79 25 11116/2012 1413h
1211249-001AMSD SUIT: 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 %REC SW8260C 52.2 50.00 104 72-151 11/1612012 1413h
1211249-001AMSD SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene %REC SW8260C 49.7 50.00 99.3 80-128 1111612012 1413h
1211249-001AMSD SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane %REC SW8260C 52.0 50.00 104 80-124 11116/2012 1413h
1211249-001 AMSD SUIT: Toluene-d8 %REC SW8260C 48.6 50.00 97.3 77-129 11116/2012 1413h
1211249-004AMSD Benzene J..lglL SW8260C 2,140 2,000 0 107 66-145 2.54 25 11/20/2012 1114h
1211249-004AMSD Chloroform J..lglL SW8260C 5,800 2,000 4,022 89.0 50-146 11.1 25 11/20/2012 1114h
1211249-004AMSD Methylene chloride J..lglL SW8260C 2,360 2,000 34.63 116 30-192 2.72 25 11120/2012 1114h
1211249-004AMSD Naphthalene J..lglL SW8260C 2,070 2,000 0 103 41-131 1.06 25 11/20/2012 1114h
1211249-004AMSD Tetrahydrofuran J..lglL SW8260C 1,860 2,000 0 93.3 43-146 6.54 25 11/2012012 1114h
1211249-004AMSD Toluene J..lglL SW8260C 2,080 2,000 0 104 18-192 2.8 25 1112012012 1114h
1211249-004AMSD Xylenes, Total J..lglL SW8260C 6,370 6,000 0 106 42-167 2.17 25 1112012012 1114h
1211249-004AMSD SUIT: 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 %REC SW8260C 5,480 5,000 110 72-151 1112012012 1114h
1211249-004AMSD SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene %REC SW8260C 4,890 5,000 97.7 80-128 1112012012 1114h
1211249-004AMSD SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane %REC SW8260C 5,040 5,000 101 80-124 11/20/2012 1114h
1211249-004AMSD SUIT: Toluene-d8 %REC SW8260C 4,870 5,000 97.5 77-129 11/2012012 1114h
Report Date: 1112912012 Page 37 of37
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1211249
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 1 of5 11116/2012
Client ID: DENI00 Contact: Garrin Palmer
___ ~roject: Semiannual Groundwater 2012 QC Level: LEVEL III WOType: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 & Summary. Project specific DL's: see COCo EDD-Denison. Email Group.;
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1211249-001A MW-11_11122012 11112/2012 1330h 11116/20120940h 11129/2012 Aqueous 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211249-001B 300.0-W ~ df-we
SELAnalytes: ~L F S04 -_._--
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC -
1211249-001C TOS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1211249-0010 NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
SEL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/003 &
I1h3
N02/N03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/n03 &
nl13
SEL Analytes: N03N02N -------
1211249-002A MW-15_11142012 11/14/2012 123511 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
------
1211249-002B 300.0-W ~ df-we
SEL Ana~_ytes: CL F_ S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
SEL A_nalytes: ALKB ALKC ----.------
1211249'-002C TOS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS ----
1211249-0020 NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
n02/n03 &
I1h3
SEL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/003 &
nh3 -----------------------.---. N02IN03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
SEL Analytes: N03N02N --. ---._._-
1211249-003A MW-25_11122012 11112/2012 1308h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1J: %M c::;,y-RT [3" CN0 TATE(' QC HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1211249
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 2 of5 11116/2012
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1211249-003B MW-25_11122012 11112/2012 l308h 11116/20120940h 11/29/2012 Aqueous 300.0-W ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211249-003C TDS-W-2S40C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1211249-003D NH3-W-3S0.1 ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
SEL.Analytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR ~ df -
n02/n03 &
nh3
N02IN03-W-~ df -
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1211249-004A MW-26_11152012 11115/20120730h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211249-004B 300.0-W ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: CL ~ .. S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
SEL ~nalytes: AL~ ALKC
1211249-004C TDS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1211249-004D NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
SEL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3 -N02IN03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/n03 &
n113
-SEL Analy~es: N03N02N
1211249-00SA MW-27_11132012 11113/2012 BOSh 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
121 1249-005B 300.0-W ~ df-we
SEI: Allalytes: ~L F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
.-SEL Anal~!es: ALKB ~LKC
1211249-005C TDS-W-2S40C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analyt~s: TDS .------
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M D RT D CND TAT D QCD HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ COC Emailed __ .
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1211249
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 3 of5 11/16/2012
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1211249-005D MW-27_11132012 11/13/20121305h 11116/20120940h 11129/2012 Aqueous NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NH3N
__ _ SEL Analy,_te_s:_N_0_3_N_0 __ 2_N ___________ _
n02/n03 &
nh3
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
N02IN03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/1103 &
nh3
1211249-006A MW-28_11142012 11114/20121100h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211249-006B 300.0-W ~ df -we
SEL Allalytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211249-006C TJ2S-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SET .. Analytes: TDS
1211249-006D NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NI,_IJ_N ______ , ________ _
SEL Analy!es: N03N02N
1102/n03 &
nh3
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
N02IN03-W-~ df-
353.2 1102/n03 &
nh3
1211249-007A MW-29_11142012 11114/20121350h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211249-007B 300.0-W ~ df -we
SEt: Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: ALKll ALK_C _____ _
121 1249-007C -----TDS-W -2540C ~ ww -tds
, _________ ~EL Analy_t.~es=.:.:_T_D-=-S ____________ , ____ _
1211249-007D NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytes:,_N_H_3_N ______________ , __ _
1102/n03 &
nh3
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
-----------.. . .. _------
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK__ HOK__ HOK__ COC Emaited
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1211249
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 4 of 5 11/1612012
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1211249-007D MW-29 _11142012 11114/2012 1350h 11116/20120940h 11129/2012 Aqueous N02IN03-W-~ df-
SEL Allalytes: N03N02N
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
1211249-008A MW-30_11132012 11113/20121140h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211249-008B 300.0-W ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df -we
SEL AIl~lytes: ALKB ALKC
1211249-008C TDS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Allalytes: TDS
1211249-008D NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Allalytes: NH3N
1102/1103 &
nh3
NH3-W-PR I~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
------N02IN03-W-~ df-
SEL Allalytes: N03~_0_2_N ________________ _
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
1211249-009A MW-35_1l132012 11113/2012 134511 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211249-009B 300.0-W ~ df-we 1
SEL AnaJytes: CL F _SO_4 _____________________ _
-----ALK-W-2320B ~ df -we
_________ SEL Analytes: ALKB AI __ JK_C ________ _
1211249-009C -----------TDS~W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS ___ _
1211249-009D NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NlI3N
n02/n03 &
nh3
-NH3-W-PR ~ df-
SEL Allalytes: N03N02N __
n02/1103 &
nh3
N02IN03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
1211249-010A MW-36_11142012 11114/20120900h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211249-010B -----300.0-W ~ df -we
~EL Analytes: CL F S04
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QCO HOK__ HOK__ HOK__ COCEmailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1211249
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 5 of5 11116/2012
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1211249-01OB MW-36_11142012 11114/20120900h 11116/20120940h 11129/2012 Aqueous ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211249-010C TDS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1211249-010D NH3-W-350.l ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
SEL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
N02/N03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1211249-011A Trip Blank 11112/2012 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M D RT 0 CN D TAT D QC 0 HOK __ HOK __ _ HOK __ COC Emailed-:...-___ _
Client £ (\er~ f\A-e.\s.
Address .2Yf,S .5> ttw~ \g,1
[)\WJlMr.. \.>0 g'1 511
City....J State Zip
Phone 4"\S f07K 222.1 Fax, ______ _
Contact G-wr 10 poJrocc
E-mail ~polMe«.(Q?fne:~~~eb ... CoM
Project Name S,e..M ;&\ I'\V\ \A.6\,\ LrrouJ'A,,J.er .2..012
Project Number/P.O.# _________ _
Sampler Name :r:\nn=ec !toll ;atA~
OatelTime
Collected
AMERICAN
WEST CHAIN OF
CUSTODY ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES [phone]
[phone]
Salt Lake City, Utah Fax [phone]
463 West 3600 South
84115 Email:[e-mail]
TESTS REQUIRED C
""""
1ij '8 ~ '0 r'l \".C ~ 4 ~KII ~ 0 ~
j ~ 8 '< .. ,~ X~ ~ ~ .-... ........ .b1l 4: tA r/\ A'
Lab Sample Set # 121/2 Glf
. Page ) of __ --" __ _
Turn Around Time (Circle One)
1 day 2 day 3 day 4 day 5 da(9
QC LEVEL
1 2 2+
CD 3+ 4
LABORATORY USE ONLY
2 Ambientoe
Notes:,
V'Y\ IctL 7
3 Temperature ~
CIlE <.:::;r" ...
1:E:l -...' 0 .I. Sample 10 z "< "< ? J COMMENTS 4 Received BrOke~/Leaki 9 ~properlY Seale ,
'" 'rJte;j:! ~ r-r'f~/~
5 ~perlY preserve~
(.Gt{ecked at Bench
Y N
Notes:
6 Received Within
Holding TImes tr>. N
M6tes:
If COC Tape Was:
1 Present on Outer
~kage
L '-. lSpeciallnstructions: \V N Date Kecelvea tsy: ::>Ignature
\\/ S/12
NA
Time PRINT NAME
\\OD
Relinquished By: Signature I Date I wale
=---...: "' I .,-..-. . . m .... 2 ~~ken on Outer
----. .. _ _. . > 2 :.: ) r)T'~Q~\ :ferop blanK :kl1J""adg =11 V age N NA
PRINT NAME I Time AME I Time
3 Present on Sample "AI
Y N ~J
Relinquished By: Signature I Date 4 Unbroken on Sample /-1 \
II II Y N e.v
PRINT NAME I PRINT NAME I Time
Relinquished By: Signature Date
Discrepancies Between --': 1:1 l,samPle Labels and cEjc ...., ,; ; Record?
II II Y N Notes:
PRINT NAME Time
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TOX
TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
s Ie Set Ext
Preservative All Except Except Except Except Except
OK I L 3 t; 5'
pH <2 J-hS04 \/",.< v~s y¢ V~ V~.s-
pH <2 H2SO4 :/ I / 7 1
PH >12 NaOH
pH <2 HN03
pH <2 H2SO4 fcc, vt'.., Vef yes y~
pH <2 H2SO4
f , / I
pH <2 HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH> 9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <21-hP04
pH <2 1-IzS04
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 HCL
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
doH
Except Except
G 7
ye""~ y~
V~ y~
I I
Except Except Except
g-'1 I(J
ye'l y;'e-s ~)
/ /
VcU yer ye-~
I /
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved properly list its eA1ensioll and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on coe
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
Sample Set: /2..112 lf1
Except Except Except Except Except
I
I
::r .g
U'.l t ~ ;x
U'.l e: "0 n o
i (J
I ~ §-
(D
I--'-.-..::1 ...... p..
II .......
N .......
00
-.....l ~ +:>. ~ o .......
\0 -.....l VI o
00 o .......
\0
.......
I--' -....... .......
VI N o .......
N
n (i!
~
z (1)
::E
Ul :!.
3 '(1) :J t'"I'
< iii'
:E
~ :J C. 5'
Ul 2:
3 (1) :J VI'
BNB.RGY FUE.l.S-WHITB. MB.SA MILL 4356782221 47 LBS 1 OF 1
6425 S HWY 191
BLANDING UT 84511 DWT: 26,16,14
SHIP TO:
AMERICAN WEST ANALYfICAL LAB
801-263-8686
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABS
463 WEST 3600 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115
aJ:~.'Y.~t\$.~f. '-'It~j./~. :/\.. J~~ Sf t'"f (1.1 • ~~ UT 841 9-04
~i~~~ I .. -.t~~~tt.,:. • Iff":. L4.r:...f~"( • •• ...x+Y.'M~~ •• 111111111111
UPS NEXT DAY AIR
TRACKING #: 1Z 187 Y4Y 01 97508019
BILLJNG: PIP
XOL 12.09.02 NV45 33.0A 10/2012
1
sp; ~
> ~.
cr' ...... I--'-~
.......
N .......
00
-.....l ~ ~ o .......
\0 -.....l VI o 00 o .......
\0
'"0
cffl (D
.......
o ~ .......
g
til
t ~ :>< til e: "d n o i
I (D
~ g.
(D ...-.~ ~
l--'
N l--'
00 -.J ~ .J:::.. ~ o
l--'
\0 Vl
00 0\ 0\ .J:::.. o w
l--'
l--' ..........
l--'
Vl N o
l--'
N
()
iiJ .~ (J)
2: (J) :E
(J) ::r
3 ro ::J rt
< iii'
:E
~ ::J 0. :;'
(J)
2:
3 ~ (jj
ENERGY FUELS-WHITE MESA MILL
4356782221 36 LBS 1 OF 1
6425 S HWY 191
BLANDING ur 84511 DWT: 26,16)4
SHIP TO:
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LAB
801-263-8686
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABS
463 WEST 3600 SOlITH
SALT LAKE CI1Y UT 84115
~~ ).~.~.\.~~~: ~1~*i.i~i'~· ~l'$ ~~~I';t~· UT 841 9-04
:)i .. ~®.~~S ~~ ( ~t."~ I .p .. ~\ ;.~~\... ..,. .. , .. ) ..... .x4: .... Jol 111111111 III
UPS NEXT DAY AIR
TRACKING #: lZ 187 Y4Y 01 9586 6403
BILLING: PIP
XOJ. 1:'M9.02 NV45 33,M ]0/2012
1
-pe 1m
> ~.
0-' ..... l--' I--'
~ N
~
00
-.J ~ ~ o
~
\0
Vl
00
0\ 0\ .J:::.. o w
~ ~ (!)
~
o H:l
~
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mai1: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ill: 1211436
American West Analytical Laboratories received 14 sample(s) on 11/30/2012 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Association Conference (NELAC) Institute in Utah and Texas;
and is state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri. In addition,
A W AL is also accredited by the American Analytical Laboratory Association (A2LA) on
ISO IEC 17025:2005, Department of Defense (DOD), UST for the State of Wyoming, and
the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). All analyses were
performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute andlor A2LA protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation documents are available upon request. If you have any -
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You, Ky I e F .. Digitally Signed by Kyle F. Gross
DN: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G email=[e-mail]. c=US ras.s-, Date:20~2.12.1215:58:18-07'OO'
Approvedby: ~ ______________________ ~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 1 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee, Privileges of
subsequent use, of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in, c?nnection with the adverti~ement, pro,motion or sale ,of any product or process, or in connection with the re,-publication of this report for any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Lab Set ID: 1211436
Date Received: 11/30/2012 1045h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1211436-001A MW-01 11272012 11/27/2012 0950h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 8260C/5030C
1211436-001B MW-01 11272012 11/27/2012 0950h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211436-001B MW-01 11272012 11/2712012 0950h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
Phone: [phone] 1211436-001C MW-01 11272012 11/27/2012 0950h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Toll Free: [phone] 1211436-001D MW-01 11272012 11/27/2012 0950h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: (801) 263··8687 1211436-001D MW-01 11272012 11/27/2012 0950h Aqueous Ammonia,Aqueous
~-mail: awal@awal-Iabs .com 1211436-002A MW-02 11272012 11/27/2012 0855h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
web: www.awal-Iabs.com 1211436-002B MW-02 11272012 11127/2012 0855h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211436-002B MW-02 11272012 11127/2012 0855h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211436-002C MW-02 11272012 11127/2012 0855h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Kyle F. Gross 1211436-002D MW-02 11272012 1112712012 0855h Aqueous Ammonia,Aqueous
Laboratory Director 1211436-002D MW-02 11272012 11127120120855h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211436-003A MW-03 11282012 ' 1112812012 1325h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
Jose Rocha 8260C/5030C
QA Officer 1211436-003B MW-03 11282012 11/2812012 1325h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211436-003B MW-03 11282012 11128/2012 1325h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211436-003C MW-03 11282012 11128/2012 1325h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
1211436-003D MW-03 11282012 11128/2012 1325h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211436-003D MW-03 11282012 11128/2012 1325h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1211436-004A MW-03A 11292012 11129/2012 0750h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
1211436-004B MW-03A 11292012 1112912012 0750h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211436-004B MW-03A 11292012 1112912012 0750h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211436-004C MW-03A 11292012 11129/2012 0750h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
1211436-004D MW-03A 11292012 11129/2012 0750h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211436-004D MW-03A 11292012 11/2912012 0750h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1211436-005A MW-05 11272012 11/2712012 1545h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
1211436-005B MW-05 11272012 1112712012 1545h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211436-005B MW-05 11272012 11/27/2012 1545h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211436-005C MW-05 11272012 11/27/2012 1545h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 2 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in, c?nnection \\lith the advertisement, promotion or sale.of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re."publication of this report for any
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
American West Lab Set ID: 1211436
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Date Received: 11 /30/2012 1045h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
1211436-005D MW-05 11272012 11127/2012 1545h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
463 West 3600 South 1211436-005D MW-05 11272012 11127/2012 1545h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
~alt Lake City, UT 84115 1211436-006A MW-12 11272012 11127/2012 1140h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1211436-006B MW-12 11272012 11127/2012 1140h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211436-006B MW-12 11272012 11/2712012 1140h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Phone: [phone] Carbonate, A2320B
1211436-006C MW-12 11272012 11127/2012 1140h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Toll Free: [phone] 1211436-006D MW-12 11272012 11/27/2012 1140h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: [phone] 1211436-006D MW-12 11272012 11/27/2012 1140h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
~-mail: [e-mail] 1211436-007 A MW-14 11272012 1112712012 1335h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
web: www.awal-Iabs.com 1211436-007B MW-14 11272012 11127/2012 1335h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211436-007B MW-14 11272012 11127/2012 1335h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211436-007C MW-14 11272012 1112712012 1335h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Kyle F. Gross 1211436-007D MW-14 11272012 1112712012 1335h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Laboratory Director 1211436-007D MW-14 11272012 1112712012 1335h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1211436-008A MW-17 11282012 1112812012 1045h Aqueous voA by GC/MS Method
Jose Rocha 8260C/5030C
QA Officer 1211436-008B MW-17 11282012 11/28/2012 1045h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211436-008B MW-17 11282012 11/2812012 1045h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211436-008C MW-17 11282012 1112812012 1045h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
1211436-008D MW-17 11282012 1112812012 1045h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211436-008D MW-17 11282012 11/28/2012 1045h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1211436-009A MW-18 11262012 11126/2012 1350h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
1211436-009B MW-18 11262012 1112612012 1350h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211436-009B MW-18 11262012 11126/2012 1350h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211436-009C MW-18 11262012 1112612012 1350h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
1211436-009D MW-18 11262012 11/2612012 1350h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211436-009D MW-18 11262012 11/2612012 1350h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1211436-010A MW-22 11262012 11126/2012 1300h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
1211436-010B MW-22 11262012 1112612012 1300h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211436-010B MW-22 11262012 11/26/2012 1300h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211436-010C MW-22 11262012 1112612012 1300h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 3 of42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ~ith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
American West Lab Set ID: 1211436
ANALYTICAL LA BORATORI ES Date Received: 11/30/2012 1045h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
1211,436-010D MW-22 11262012 1112612012 1300h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
463 West 3600 South 1211436-010D MW-22 11262012 11126/2012 1300h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 1211436-011A MW-24 11292012 11129/2012 0653h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1211436-011B MW-24 11292012 11129/2012 0653h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211436-011B MW-24 11292012 11129/2012 0653h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Phone: [phone] Carbonate, A2320B
1211436-011C MW-24 11292012 11129/2012 0653h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
foIl Free: [phone] 1211436-011D MW-24 11292012 11129/2012 0653h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: [phone] 1211436-011D MW-24 11292012 11129/2012 0653h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
~-mai1: [e-mail] 1211436-012A MW-65 11272012 11/27/2012 0855h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
web: www.awa1-labs.com 1211436-012B · MW-65 11272012 11/27/2012 0855h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211436-012B MW-65 11272012 1112712012 0855h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211436-012C MW-65 11272012 1112712012 0855h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C Kyle F. Gross 1211436-012D MW-65 11272012 11/27/2012 0855h Aqueous Ammonia,Aqueous
Laboratory Director 1211436-012D MW-65 11272012 11/2712012 0855h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211436-013A MW-70 11282012 11/2812012 1045h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Jose Rocha 8260C/5030C
QA Officer 1211436-013B MW-70 11282012 1112812012 1045h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1211436-013B MW-70 11282012 11128/2012 1045h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1211436-013C MW-70 11282012 11128/2012 1045h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
1211436-013D MW-70 11282012 11/28/2012 1045h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1211436-013D MW-70 11282012 11/28/2012 1045h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1211436-014A Trip Blank 11126/2012 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 1211212012 Page 4 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of t~e name of this company or any. member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this. report for any
Inorganic Case Narrative
American West Client: ANALYTI CAL LABORATORIE S Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
1211436
11130/2012
11126 -11129/2012
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exception: The MSD percent recovery on nitratelnitrite was outside of
control limits for sample 1211436-007D due to sample matrix interference.
Duplicate (DUP): The parameters that required a duplicate analysis had RPDs
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 12/1212012 Page 5 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. oft~e name of this company or any member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in. c~nnection ,,:,ith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale.of any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication oft?is report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-rnail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
1211436
11130/2012
11126 -11129/2012
Intact
None
SW -846 8260C/S030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: Multiple target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 12112/2012 Page 6 of 42
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or pro~ess, or in connection with the re.-publication oft?isreport for any
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211436
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID
1211436-001CDUP
1211436-010CDUP
1211436-013CDUP
Analyte
Total Dissolved Solids
Total Dissolved Solids
Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: DUP
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L SM2540C 1,320 1,340
mg/L SM2540C 8,040 8,080
mg/L SM2540C 3,650 3,536
%RPD
1.5
0.496
3.12
RPD
Limit
5
5
5
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
11130/2012 1420h
12/3/2012 1430h
11/30/2012 1420h
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 34 of 42
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANA LYTI CAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211436
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS-R48062 Chloride
LCS-R48062 Sulfate
LCS-R48245 Chloride
LCS-R48245 Fluoride
LCS-R48245 Sulfate
LCS-R48302 Fluoride
LCS-R47945 Alkalinity (as CaC03)
LCS-22479 Ammonia (as N)
LCS-R48018 NitratelNitrite (as N)
LCS-R47953 Total Dissolved Solids
LCS-R47956 Total Dissolved Solids
LCS-R48001 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mgIL E300.0 5.27 5.000 0 105 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5.27 5.000 0 105 90-110
mglL E300.0 5.23 5.000 0 105 90-110
mglL E300.0 5.34 5.000 0 107 90-110
mglL E300.0 5.29 5.000 0 106 90-110
mglL E300.0 5.20 5.000 0 104 90-110
mglL SM2320B 50,100 50,000 0 100 90-110
mglL E350.1 1.03 1.000 0 103 90-110
mglL E353.2 1.04 1.000 0 104 90-110
mglL SM2540C 192 205.0 0 93.7 80-120
mglL SM2540C 190 205.0 0 92.7 80-120
mgIL SM2540C 192 205.0 0 93.7 80-120
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/4/2012 0820h
12/412012 0820h
1211012012 1631h
12110120121631h
1211012012 1631h
1211112012 1608h
12/3/2012 1106h
12/312012 1906h
12/4/2012 1845h
11130/2012 1420h
11130/2012 1420h
12/312012 1430h
Report Date: 12/1212012 Page 35 of 42
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211436
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB-R48062 Chloride
MB-R48062 Sulfate
MB-R48245 Chloride
MB-R48245 Fluoride
MB-R48245 Sulfate
MB-R48302 Fluoride
MB-R47945 Bicarbonate (as CaC03)
MB-R47945 Carbonate (as CaC03)
MB-22479 Ammonia (as N)
MB-R48018 NitratelNitrite (as N)
MB-R47953 Total Dissolved Solids
MB-R47956 Total Dissolved Solids
MB-R48001 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00
mgIL E300.0 < 0.100
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00
mg/L E300.0 < 0.100
mg/L SM2320B < 1.00
mg/L SM2320B < 1.00
mg/L E350.1 < 0.0500
mg/L E353.2 < 0.100
mg/L SM2540C < 10.0
mg/L SM2540C < 10.0
mg/L SM2540C < 10.0
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/4/2012 0758h
12/4/2012 0758h
12/10/2012 1502h
12/10/2012 1502h
1211 0/20 12 1502h
12/1112012 1546h
12/3/2012 1106h
12/3/2012 1106h
12/3/2012 1905h
12/4/2012 1844h
11/30/2012 1420h
11130/2012 1420h
12/3/2012 1430h
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 36 of 42
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANfd,YTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211436
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1211436-001BMS Chloride
1211436-001BMS Sulfate
1211436-002BMS Fluoride
1211436-008BMS Chloride
1211436-008BMS Fluoride
1211436-008BMS Sulfate
1211436-010BMS Fluoride
1212130-001BMS Fluoride
1211436-001BMS Alkalinity (as CaC03)
1211436-001DMS Ammonia (as N)
1211436-007DMS Ammonia (as N)
1211436-001DMS NitratelNitrite (as N)
1211436-007DMS NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
j2C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mgIL E300.0 5,400 5,000 13.62 108 90-110
mglL E300.0 6,130 5,000 845.5 106 90-110
mglL E300.0 5,110 5,000 0.2620 102 90-110
mglL E300.0 5,050 5,000 46.05 100 90-110
mglL E300.0 5,160 5,000 0 103 90-110
mg/L E300.0 6,960 5,000 1,569 108 90-110
mglL E300.0 5,370 5,000 13.53 107 90-110
mglL E300.0 4,910 5,000 0 98.3 90-110
mglL SM2320B 290 50.00 239.9 100 80-120
mglL E350.1 1.21 1.000 0.1536 106 90-110
mglL E350.1 1.05 1.000 0 105 90-110
mgIL E353.2 1.04 1.000 0 104 90-110
mglL E353.2 1.09 1.000 0 109 90-110
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/412012 0949h
12/412012 0949h
12/10/2012 1844h
12/1012012 1609h
12/10/2012 1609h
12/10/2012 1609h
12/11/2012 1652h
12/11/2012 2356h
12/312012 1106h
12/312012 1911h
12/312012 1928h
12/412012 1854h
12/412012 1913h
Report Date: 12/1212012 Page 37 of 42
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANAlYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211436
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1211436-001BMSD Chloride
1211436-001BMSD Sulfate
1211436-002BMSD Fluoride
1211436-008BMSD Chloride
1211436-008BMSD Fluoride
1211436-008BMSD Sulfate
1211436-01OBMSD Fluoride
1212130-001BMSD Fluoride
1211436-001BMSD Alkalinity (as CaC03)
1211436-001DMSD Ammonia (as N)
1211436-007DMSD Ammonia (as N)
1211436-001DMSD NitratelNitrite (as N)
1211436-007DMSD NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
jlC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 5,370 5,000 13.62 107 90-110
mg/L E300.0 6,060 5,000 845.5 104 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5,070 5,000 0.2620 101 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5,040 5,000 46.05 100 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5,090 5,000 0 102 90-110
mg/L E300.0 6,690 5,000 1,569 103 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5,220 5,000 13.53 104 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5,010 5,000 0 100 90-110
mg/L SM2320B 292 50.00 239.9 104 80-120
mg/L E350.1 1.15 1.000 0.1536 99.4 90-110
mg/L E350.1 1.06 1.000 0 106 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.08 1.000 0 108 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.15 1.000 0 115 90-110
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
%RPD
0.606
1.25
0.834
0.169
1.37
3.89
2.75
1.9
0.619
5.45
0.881
4.36
5.06
RPD
Limit
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
10
10
10
10
10
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/4/2012 1011h
12/4/2012 1011h
12/10/2012 1906h
12/10/2012 1653h
12/10/2012 1653h
12110/2012 1653h
12/11/2012 1715h
12112/2012 0018h
12/3/2012 1106h
12/3/2012 1912h
12/3/2012 1929h
12/4/2012 1856h
12/4/2012 1914h
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 38 of 42
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTlCA l LAB ORATOR I ES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211436
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS VOC 120312A Benzene
LCS VOC 120312A Chloroform
LCS VOC 120312A Methylene chloride
LCS VOC 120312A Naphthalene
LCS VOC 120312A Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 120312A Toluene
LCS VOC 120312A Xylenes, Total
LCS VOC 120312A SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
LCS VOC 120312A SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 120312A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 120312A SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
JlC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlglL SW8260C 21.4 20.00 0 107 62-127
IlglL SW8260C 20.2 20.00 0 101 67-132
IlglL SW8260C 21.3 20.00 0 107 32-185
IlglL SW8260C 14.1 20.00 0 70.4 28-136
IlglL SW8260C 17.4 20.00 0 86.8 43-146
IlglL SW8260C 21.8 20.00 0 109 64-128
IlglL SW8260C 62.1 60.00 0 103 52-134
%REC SW8260C 51.6 50.00 103 76-138
%REC SW8260C 48.6 50.00 97.2 77-121
%REC SW8260C 50.5 50.00 101 67-128
%REC SW8260C 50.8 50.00 102 81-135
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/3/2012 0838h
12/3/2012 0838h
12/3/2012 0838h
12/3/2012 0838h
12/3/2012 0838h
12/3/2012 0838h
12/3/2012 0838h
12/3/2012 0838h
12/3/2012 0838h
12/3/2012 0838h
12/3/2012 0838h
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 39 of 42
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the fe-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTICAL LA80l<ATORI£S
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211436
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 120312A 2-Butanone
MB VOC 120312A Acetone
MB VOC 120312A Benzene
MB VOC 120312A Carbon tetrachloride
MB VOC 120312A Chloroform
MB VOC 120312A Chloromethane
MB VOC 120312A Methylene chloride
MB VOC 120312A Naphthalene
MB VOC 120312A Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 120312A Toluene
MB VOC 120312A Xylenes, Total
MB VOC 120312A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 120312A SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 120312A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 120312A SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
~glL SW8260C <20.0
~glL SW8260C <20.0
~glL SW8260C ~ 1.00
~glL SW8260C < 1.00
~glL SW8260C < 1.00
~glL SW8260C < 1.00
~glL SW8260C < 1.00
~glL SW8260C < 1.00
~glL SW8260C < 1.00
~glL SW8260C < 1.00
~glL SW8260C < 1.00
%REC SW8260C 51.7 50.00 103 76-138
%REC SW8260C 54.2 50.00 108 77-121
%REC SW8260C 50.1 50.00 100 67-128
%REC SW8260C 51.9 50.00 104 81-135
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/3/2012 0916h
12/3/2012 0916h
12/3/2012 0916h
12/3/2012 0916h
12/312012 0916h
12/3/2012 0916h
12/3/2012 0916h
12/3/2012 0916h
12/312012 0916h
12/3/2012 0916h
12/3/2012 0916h
12/312012 0916h
12/3/2012 0916h
12/3/2012 0916h
12/312012 0916h
Report Date: 12112/2012 Page 40 of 42
! analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANA LYTICAL LABO RATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211436
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1211436-001AMS Benzene
1211436-001AMS Chloroform
1211436-001AMS Methylene chloride
1211436-001AMS Naphthalene
1211436-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
1211436-001AMS Toluene
1211436-001AMS Xylenes, Total
1211436-001AMS SUIT: 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1211436-001AMS SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1211436-001AMS SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1211436-001AMS SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
Ilg/L SW8260C 22.4 20.00 0 112 66-145
Ilg/L SW8260C 21.2 20.00 0 106 50-146
Ilg/L SW8260C 23.5 20.00 0 118 30-192
Ilg/L SW8260C 14.2 20.00 0 70.9 41-131
Ilg/L SW8260C 46.4 20.00 21.81 123 43-146
Ilg/L SW8260C 22.2 20.00 0 III 18-192
Ilg/L SW8260C 62.7 60.00 0 104 42-167
%REC SW8260C 52.7 50.00 105 72-151
%REC SW8260C 48.5 50.00 97.0 80-128
%REC SW8260C 50.8 50.00 102 80-124
%REC SW8260C 49.4 50.00 98.8 77-129
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/3/2012 1058h
12/3/2012 1058h
12/3/2012 1058h
12/3/2012 1058h
12/3/2012 1058h
12/3/2012 1058h
12/3/2012 1058h
12/3/2012 1058h
12/3/2012 1058h
12/3/2012 1058h
12/3/2012 1058h
Report Date: 12/12/2012 Page 41 of 42
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1211436
Project: Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1211436-001AMSD Benzene
1211436-001AMSD Chloroform
1211436-001AMSD Methylene chloride
1211436-001AMSD Naphthalene
1211436-001AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
1211436-001AMSD Toluene
1211436-001AMSD Xylenes, Total
1211436-001AMSD Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1211436-001AMSD Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1211436-001AMSD Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
1211436-001AMSD Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
JlC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
~glL SW8260C 19.2 20.00 0 95.8 66-145
~glL SW8260C 18.0 20.00 0 90.0 50-146
~glL SW8260C 19.7 20.00 0 98.4 30-192
~glL SW8260C 11.6 20.00 0 58.2 41-131
~glL SW8260C 46.6 20.00 21.81 124 43-146
~glL SW8260C 19.3 20.00 0 96.6 18-192
~glL SW8260C 54.0 60.00 0 89.9 42-167
%REC SW8260C 51.0 50.00 102 72-151
%REC SW8260C 47.4 50.00 94.7 80-128
%REC SW8260C 49.6 50.00 99.1 80-124
%REC SW8260C 49.6 50.00 99.2 77-129
%RPD
15.8
16.6
17.8
19.7
0.408
13.9
14.9
RPD
Limit
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/3/2012 1117h
12/3/2012 1117h
12/3/2012 1117h
12/3/2012 1117h
12/3/2012 1117h
12/3/2012 1117h
12/3/2012 1117h
12/3/2012 1117h
12/3/2012 1117h
12/3/2012 1117h
12/3/2012 1117h
Report Date: 12112/2012 Page 42 of 42
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American "Vest Analytical Laboratories UL
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1211436
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 1 of 6 11130/2012
Client ID: DEN 1 00 Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012 QC Level: LEVEL III WO Type: Project
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 & Summary. Project specific DL's: see COCo Report Alkalinity down to the MDL. EDD-Denison. Email Group.; .a.A-
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1211436-001A MW-Ol_11272012 11127/20120950h 11130/2012 1045h 12/11/2012 Aqueous 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211436-001B 300.0-W ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211436-001C TOS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1211436-0010 NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NH3N
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
no2/no3 &
nh3
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
no2/no3 &
nh3
N02IN03-W-~ df-
353.2 no2/no3 &
nh3
1211436-002A MW-02_11272012 11/27/20120855h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211436-002B 300.0-W ~ df -we
SEL Analytcs: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df -we
SEL Analytcs: ALKB ALKC
1211436-002C TOS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1211436-0020 NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NH3N
no2/no3 &
nh3
. NH3-W-PR ~ df-
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
no2/no3 &
nh3
N02IN03-W-~ df-
353.2 no2/no3 &
nh3
1211436-003A MW-03_11282012 11128/20121325h / 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M TAT [S;V/ QC HOK__ HOK__ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1211436
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 2 of 6 11/30/2012
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Set Storage
1211436-003B MW-03_11282012 11128120121325h 11130/20121045h 12/11/2012 Aqueous 300.0-W ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211436-003C TDS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1211436-003D NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NH3N
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
n02/003 &
nh3
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
1102/n03 &
nh3
N02IN03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
1211436-004A MW-03A_11292012 11129120120750h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211436-004B 300.0-W ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211436-004C TDS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1211436-004D NH3-W-350.l ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NH3N
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
n02/003 &
nh3
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
1102/003 &
nh3
N02IN03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/003 &
nh3
1211436-005A MW-05_1l272012 11127120121545h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211436-005B 300.0-W ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211436-005C TDS-W-2S40C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK__ HOK__ HOK__ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1211436
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 3 of 6 11130/2012
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1211436-005D MW-05_11272012 11/27/20121545h 11/30/20121045h 12/1112012 Aqueous NH3-W-350.l ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NH3N
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
n02/n03 &
nh3
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
N02/N03-W-~ df-
353.2 1102/n03 &
nh3
1211436-006A MW-12_11272012 11127/20121140h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211436-006B 300.0-W ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211436-006C TDS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1211436-006D NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NH3N
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
n02/n03 &
nh3
NH3-W-PR ~ ·df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
N02/N03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/n03 &
nb3
1211436-007A MW-14_1l272012 1112712012 133511 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211436-007B 300.0-W ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211436-007C TDS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes:TDS
1211436-007D NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytcs: NH3N
n02/n03 &
nb3
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK__ HOK__ HOK__ COC Emailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1211436
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 4 of 6 11130/2012
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1211436-007D MW-14_1l272012 11127/2012 1335h 11130/2012 1045h 12/1112012 Aqueous N02IN03-W-~ df-
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
1211436-008A MW-17_11282012 11128/20121045h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211436-008B 300.0-W ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211436-008C TOS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1211436-0080 NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NH3N
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
n02/n03 &
nh3
NI-D-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
N02IN03-W -~ df -
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
1211436-009A MW-18_11262012 11126120121350h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211436-009B 300.0-W ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211436-009C TOS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1211436-0090 --. NH3-W-350.1· ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NH3N
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
n02/n03 &
nh3
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
N02IN03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
1211436-010A MW-22_11262012 11126/2012 1300h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211436-010B 300.0-W ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M D RTD CND TATO QeD HOK__ HOK__ HOK__ COCEmailed
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1211436
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 5 of 6 11130/2012
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1211436-010B MW-22_11262012 11126/20121300h 11130/2012 1045h 12/1112012 Aqueous ALK-W-2320B ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211436-010C TOS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TOS
1211436-0100 NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NH3N
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
n02/003 &
nh3
NI-I3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
N02/N03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
1211436-011A MW-24_11292012 11129/20120653h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211436-011B 300.0-W ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211436-011C TDS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TOS
1211436-0110 NI-I3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytcs: NH3N
SEL Analytcs: N03N02N
n02/n03 &
nh3
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
n113
N02IN03-W -~ df -
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
1211436-012A MW-65_1l272012 11127/2012085511 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211436-012B 300.0-W ~ df -we 1
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df -we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211436-012C TDS-W-2S40C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TOS
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1j: %M 0 RT 0 eN 0 TAT 0 QeD HOK __ HOK __ _ HOK __ eoe Emailed'---___ _
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1211436
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 6 of6 11/30/2012
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1211436-0120 MW-65_11272012 11127/20120855h 11/30/20121045h 12111/2012 Aqueous NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NH3N
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
n02/n03 &
nh3
NI-I3~W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
N02/N03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
1211436-013A MW-70_11282012 11/28/2012104511 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1211436-013B 300.0-W ~ df -we 1
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1211436-013C TOS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: IDS
1211436-0130 NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
SEL Analytes: NH3N
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
n02/n03 &
nh3
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
N02/N03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
1211436-014A Trip Blank 11/2612012 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fillouton page 1]: %M 0 RT D eN D TAT D QeD HOK __ _ HOK __ HOK __ _ eoe Emailed~ ___ _
American West Analytical Laboratories Chain of Custody Lab Sample Set # ! l.ll f' 3 G
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Address: 6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Project Name: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
PO#:
Sampler Name:
~ 'B ,~ ro
...., ~
§ ~
C3' a cY) -... ;...
'; 0 ~ a r::t1 a ~tr) a ~ '-~ cY) a C't) ~ 5 ~ ~ ~
CV) r... l) '-F'\' .c -.-.v a -.t v lot (l)g~o~ ~ o It') co I'll It') ."" z~---.. ~~ ........ (/) --.... N (I) (.) (.) C() we
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Sample 10: Date Sampled Time
o ~
r.n o=o .. ~ as Z z :> f.i: E-t (.) Comments
4 ~11~·u\Y~\~!-~V.~~~'-~Il~-~'~~~~!A~ __ ~1~(~I~'n~I~(~~~-~'~==-rI~~'~~~-~--I~~~--,1----+I~e_rI~"~lr'~'+I~I~\rl~('~I~P~1--r-~~--r-~~--r-~---------------
5 1,'vv'-"' ....... _II ..... ' I'"-u ..... v·-I ' ...... l' 1_1-1"1""'1"1"1"1
7 I II VV ! I .... 1\ ...... , -'"' 16 .' '! ...... ' ( -~ \ ....... I ,--......-I -I v ..... f' I " I (" I . -I " I P I
8. P vv t (-J I ~ --, --I I " ;"'-f)f -~ ( ~ I 1'-" "'.J I -=-I n I .. I ,. I .' -I "I' -I (~ I
9 I I -, VV '(>-( I ..... "'C>~ ( "'= II 1( ...... 1;2'.-v , -I ,-............ I -I .. I ( -I ' 'I "I .. I .. I .. I
Special Instructions: Email results to Tanner Holliday, Kethy Weinel, and David Turk
Relinquished by: Signatur:::J ~ )./.~ Date:. ) 1/.1.q /2-0 I ':t Received b~ature
PrintName~ t}en;Jo.~ V Time: llOD ?e o-.nner
Relinquished by: Signature Date: / Received by: Signature
Print Name Time: / Print Name
/ ,/
Relinquished by: Signature Dy Received by: .,9i~2 J 11k ~ --/
Print Name / I'fime: Print Name Z ·( V1Ar. IJ. ,)f\ Go ;; s.
./ .. . ..,
Page 1 of 1
QC Level: 3
Turn Around Time
Standard
Date:
Time:
Date:
Time:
Datil -3 (,( -/7..--
Time/ () tf.)
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TOX
TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
Sample_S{!t Exten~Jon and pH
Preservative All I""" 1""". r:::v~~~. I='vrcn.l r:::,,~ ~p
OK -() \ --C>2--O~ -().4 1-05
pH <2 H2SO4 '\(I}£; \{t2-~ \1(75) ,.\~S \Je.s
pI-I <2 I-hS04 f f 7 7 I
PH>12 NaOH
pH <2 HN03
pH <2 H2SO4 I\JQf0 \jP:S \\(7/0 \fQ;) ,lee:;
pH <2 H2SO4 { { r 7 (
pH <2 HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH> 9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH <2 H2SO4
'pH <2 H3P04
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2l-hS04
pH <2 HCL
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
LAv"'jJl
-Ola -01
'\1(27 \J~ r I
IVe> \Eb
f t
r .
-O~ -09 '-)0
\.I.eS '-lZs '\.!e:=,
f I f
1\l~5 \)L~ \}J?5h
t ,-T
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate colmml above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on cac
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
Sample Set: \ 'L-\ \ 43¢4
I=Yrpnt I='vt'cnt 1""". ~-L~
-l\ -\2--)?)
'\.la.s 'J(2S \jet.;
f I' I
\)~ I'-k2-S ~
I' , I
I
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1212130
American West Analytical Laboratories received 3 sample(s) on 12/7/2012 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Association Conference (NELAC) Institute in Utah and Texas;
and is state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri. In addition,
A W AL is also accredited by the American Analytical Laboratory Association (A2LA) on
ISO IEC 17025:2005, Department of Defense (DOD), UST for the State of Wyoming, and
the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). All analyses were
performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute and/or A2LA protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You, , r ... · Ky I e F. Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
ON: cn=Kyle F. Gross, b=AWAL,
ou=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G ro S S
e·mail=[e-mail], c=US
Date: 2012.12.18 14:09:04 -01'00'
Approved by: ~ ______________________ ~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 12/1812012 Page 1 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useofthe name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, promotion or saleof any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication of thisreport for any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Lab Set ID: 1212130
Date Received: 12/7/20121012h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1212130-001A MW-23 12052012 12/5/2012 1400h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 8260C/5030C
1212130-001B MW-23 12052012 12/5/2012 1400h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1212130-001B MW-23 12052012 12/5/2012 1400h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Phone: [phone] 1212130-001C MW-23 12052012 12/5/2012 1400h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Toll Free: [phone] 1212130-001D MW-23 12052012 12/5/2012 1400h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
Fax: [phone] 1212130-001D MW-23 12052012 12/5/2012 1400h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
~-mail: [e-mail] 1212130-002A MW-37 12052012 12/5/2012 1310h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
web: www.awal-Iabs.com 1212130-002B MW-37 12052012 12/5/2012 1310h Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
1212130-002B MW-37 12052012 12/5/2012 1310h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1212130-002C MW-37 12052012 12/5/2012 1310h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Kyle F. Gross 1212130-002D MW-37 12052012 12/5/2012 1310h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
Laboratory Director 1212130-002D MW-37 12052012 12/5/2012 1310h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1212130-003A Trip Blank 12/5/2012 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Jose Rocha 8260C/5030C
QA Officer
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 2 of 18
All analyses applicable to. the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfo.nned in accordance to. NELAC pro.to.co.ls. Pertinent sampling info.nnatio.n is lo.cated o.n the attached COe. This repo.rt is provided fo.r the exclusive use o.fthe addressee. Privileges o.f
subsequent useofthe name o.fthis co.mr.any o.r any member o.fits staff, o.r reproductio.n o.fthis report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, promotion o.r sale of any pro.duct or process, or in co.nnection with the re.-publication ofthisrepo.rt for any
Inorganic Case Narrative
American West Client: ANA LYTICA L LAB ORATORIES Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Semiannual Groundwater 2012
1212130
12/7/2012
12/5/2012
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exception: The MSD percent recovery on nitrate/nitrite was outside of
control limits for sample 1212130-001D due to matrix interference.
Duplicates (DUP): The parameters that require a duplicate analysis had RPD's
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 12/1812012 Page 3 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useofthe name of this comIJany or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in:connection ~ith the advertisement, promotion or saleof any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of thisreport for any
Volatile Case Narrative
American West Client: A NALYTICAL LABO RATORIES Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
-Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
Semiannual Groundwater 2012
1212130
12/7/2012
1215/2012
Intact
None
SW-846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: No target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 12118/2012 Page 4 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this comp'any or any member of its stan: or reproduction of this report in. connection with the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORiES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212130
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
SampleID Analyte
1212130-001CDUP Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
mg/L SM2540C
Result
3,500
Amount
Spiked
Dept: WC
QC Type: DUP
Original
Amount
3,544
%REC Limits %RPD
1.14
RPD
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Limit Qual Date Analyzed
5 121712012 1310h
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 10 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LAB O RATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212130
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS-R48302 Fluoride
LCS-R48302 Sulfate
LCS-R48361 Chloride
LCS-R48427 Chloride
LCS-R48333 Alkalinity (as CaC03)
LCS-22667 Ammonia (as N)
LCS-R48219 NitratelNitrite (as N)
LCS-R48180 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mgIL E300.0 5.20 5.000 0 104 90-110
mg/L E300.0 4.99 5.000 0 99.8 90-110
mg/L E300.0 4.91 5.000 0 98.3 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5.05 5.000 0 101 90-110
mg/L SM2320B 51 ,000 50,000 0 102 90-110
mg/L E350.1 1.08 1.000 0 108 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.00 1.000 0 100 90-110
mg/L SM2540C 200 205.0 0 97.6 80-120
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/1112012 1608h
12/1112012 1608h
12112/2012 1412h
12(13/2012 1600h
12112/20120610h
12112120122240h
12110/2012 2033h
12/7/2012 1310h
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 11 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANA LYTi CAL UtBO RATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212130
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB-R48302 Fluoride
MB-R48302 Sulfate
MB-R48361 Chloride
MB-R48427 Chloride
MB-R48333 Bicarbonate (as CaC03)
MB-R48333 Carbonate (as CaC03)
MB-22667 Ammonia (as N)
MB-R48219 NitratelNitrite (as N)
MB-R48180 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 < 0.100
mg/L E300.0 < 0.750
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00
mg/L SM2320B < 1.00
mg/L SM2320B < 1.00
mgIL E350.1 < 0.0500
mg/L E353.2 <0.100
SM2540C < 10.0
RPD
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
12/1112012 1546h
1211112012 1546h
12/1212012 1349h
12/1312012 1537h
12112/20120610h
12112/20120610h
12112/2012 2239h
1211012012 2032h
121712012 1310h
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 12 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTICAL LA80RATORI ES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212130
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1211436-010BMS Fluoride
1212130-001 BMS Fluoride
1212130-001BMS Sulfate
1212130-001BMS Chloride
1212130-001BMS Chloride
1212130-001BMS Alkalinity (as CaC03)
1212130-001DMS Ammonia (as N)
1212130-001DMS NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 5,370 5,000 13.53 107 90-110
mg/L E300.0 4,910 5,000 0 98.3 90-110
mg/L E300.0 6,550 5,000 1,332 104 90-110
mg/L E300.0 495 500.0 7.255 97.5 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5,440 5,000 8.211 109 90-110
mg/L SM2320B 302 50.00 251.5 100 80-120
mg/L E350.1 1.02 1.000 0 102 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.27 1.000 0.2197 105 90-110
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12111/2012 1652h
12111/2012 2356h
1211112012 2356h
1211212012 1923h
12/13/2012 1732h
12/12120120610h
12112120122242h
12/1012012 2113h
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 13 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212130
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1211436-010BMSD Fluoride
1212130-001BMSD Fluoride
1212130-001BMSD Sulfate
1212130-001BMSD Chloride
1212130-001BMSD Chloride
1212130-001BMSD Alkalinity (as CaC03)
1212130-001DMSD Ammonia (as N)
1212130-001DMSD NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 5,220 5,000 13.53 104 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5,010 5,000 0 100 90-110
mg/L E300.0 6,540 5,000 1,332 104 90-110
mg/L E300.0 482 500.0 7.255 95.0 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5,130 5,000 8.211 102 90-110
mg/L SM2320B 301 50.00 251.5 98.4 80-120
mg/L E350.1 1.03 1.000 0 103 90-110
mgIL E353.2 1.33 1.000 0.2197 III 90-110
1 _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
%RPD
2.75
1.9
0.l5
2.55
5.88
0.299
0.722
5.06
RPD
Limit
20
20
20
20
20
10
10
10
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/11/2012 1715h
12112/2012 0018h
12112/2012 0018h
1211212012 1946h
1211312012 1755h
12112120120610h
12112120122243h
12/10120122114h
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 14 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LA80RATOR I ES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212130
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS VOC 121012A Benzene
LCS VOC 121012A Chloroform
LCS VOC 121012A Methylene chloride
LCS VOC 121012A Naphthalene
LCS VOC 121012A Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 121012A Toluene
LCS VOC 121012A Xylenes, Total
LCS VOC 121012A SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
LCS VOC 121012A SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 121012A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 121012A SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
JlglL SW8260C 20.4 20.00 0 102 62-127
IiglL SW8260C 20.8 20.00 0 104 67-132
JlglL SW8260C 18.6 20.00 0 92.8 32-185
JlglL SW8260C 19.1 20.00 0 95.4 28-136
JlglL SW8260C 17.3 20.00 0 86.6 43-146
JlglL SW8260C 20.2 20.00 0 101 64-128
JlglL SW8260C 61.4 60.00 0 102 52-134
%REC SW8260C 51.7 50.00 103 76-138
%REC SW8260C 49.1 50.00 98.1 77-121
%REC SW8260C 50.8 50.00 102 67-128
%REC SW8260C 48.9 50.00 97.8 81-135
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/10/2012 0948h
1211 0/20 12 0948h
12/10/2012 0948h
12110/2012 0948h
1211 0/20 12 0948h
1211 0/20 12 0948h
1211 0/2012 0948h
12110/2012 0948h
12110/20120948h
12110/20120948h
1211 0/20 12 0948h
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 15 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-puQlication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTICAL LABO RATORI E$
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212130
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 121012A 2-Butanone
MB VOC 121012A Acetone
MB VOC 121012A Benzene
MB VOC 121012A Carbon tetrachloride
MB VOC 121012A Chloroform
MB VOC 121012A Chloromethane
MB VOC 121012A Methylene chloride
MB VOC 121012A Naphthalene
MB VOC 121012A Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 121012A Toluene
MB VOC 121012A Xylenes, Total
MB VOC 121012A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 121012A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 121012A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 121012A Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
~SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
)lg/L SW8260C <20.0
)lg/L SW8260C <20.0
)lg/L SW8260C < 1.00
)lg/L SW8260C < 1.00
)lg/L SW8260C < 1.00
)lg/L SW8260C < 1.00
)lg/L SW8260C < 1.00
)lg/L SW8260C < 1.00
)lg/L SW8260C < 1.00
)lg/L SW8260C < 1.00
)lg/L SW8260C < 1.00
%REC SW8260C 53.1 50.00 106 76-138
%REC SW8260C 50.0 50.00 100 77-121
%REC SW8260C 50.6 50.00 101 67-128
%REC SW8260C 49.8 50.00 99.7 81-135
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/10/2012 1025h
1211 0120 12 1025h
12/1012012 1025h
1211 012012 1025h
1211 0/20 12 1025h
12110/2012 1025h
1211 0/20 12 1025h
1211 0/2012 1025h
1211 0/2012 1025h
1211 0120 12 1025h
1211 0/20 12 1025h
1211012012 1025h
12/1012012 1025h
1211 0/20 12 1025h
1211 0/20 12 1025h
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 16 of 18
i analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212130
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1212130-001AMS Benzene
1212130-001 AMS Chloroform
l212130-001AMS Methylene chloride
l212130-001AMS Naphthalene
1212130-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
l212130-001AMS Toluene
1212130-001AMS Xylenes, Total
1212130-001AMS SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1212130-001AMS SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1212130-001AMS SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1212130-001AMS SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
JlC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
/lglL SW8260C 19.2 20.00 0 95.9 66-145
/lglL SW8260C 19.7 20.00 0 98.4 50-146
/lglL SW8260C 18.2 20.00 0 91.2 30-192
/lglL SW8260C 18.2 20.00 0 91.0 41-131
/lglL SW8260C 16.1 20.00 0 80.4 43-146
/lglL SW8260C 18.8 20.00 0 93.8 18-192
/lglL SW8260C 57.3 60.00 0 95.6 42-167
%REC SW8260C 53.3 50.00 107 72-151
%REC SW8260C 49.6 50.00 99.2 80-128
%REC SW8260C 51.2 50.00 102 80-124
%REC SW8260C 48.4 50.00 96.8 77-129
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/1012012 1251h
12/1012012 1251h
1211012012 1251h
1211012012 1251h
1211 012012 1251 h
12/10/2012 1251h
1211012012 1251h
12/10/2012 1251h
12110/2012 1251h
1211012012 1251h
12110/2012 1251h
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 17 ofl8
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORiE.S
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212130
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1212130-001AMSD Benzene
1212130-001AMSD Chloroform
1212130-001AMSD Methylene chloride
1212130-001AMSD Naphthalene
1212130-001AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
1212130-001AMSD Toluene
1212130-001AMSD Xylenes, Total
1212130-001AMSD SUIT: 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1212130-001AMSD SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1212130-001AMSD SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1212130-001AMSD SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
OC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlglL SW8260C 20.9 20.00 0 104 66-145
IlglL SW8260C 21.2 20.00 0 106 50-146
IlglL SW8260C 19.4 20.00 0 96.9 30-192
IlglL SW8260C 20.3 20.00 0 101 41-131
IlglL SW8260C 18.8 20.00 0 93.9 43-146
IlglL SW8260C 20.6 20.00 0 103 18-192
IlglL SW8260C 62.8 60.00 0 105 42-167
%REC SW8260C 52.4 50.00 105 72-151
%REC SW8260C 49.4 50.00 98.7 80-128
%REC SW8260C 51.0 50.00 102 80-124
%REC SW8260C 48.5 50.00 97.1 77-129
%RPD
8.44
7.57
6.01
10.7
15.6
9.45
9.09
RPD
Limit
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/10120121310h
12110120121310h
12/10120121310h
12110120121310h
12110120121310h
12110120121310h
12110120121310h
12/10120121310h
12110120121310h
12110/20121310h
12110/20121310h
Report Date: 12/18/2012 Page 18 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West .LL\nalytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1212130
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 1 of 1 12/7/2012
Client ID: DENIOO Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012 QC Level: LEVEL III WOType:
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 & Summary. Project specific DL's: see COCo EDD-Denison. Email Group.;
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1212130-001A ~-23_12052012 12/5/2012 1400h 12/7/20121012h 12/18/2012 Aqueous 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1212130-00lB 300.0-W ~ df-we
8EL Analytes: CL F 804
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
8EL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1212130-001C TOS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
8EL Analytes: TD8
1212130-0010 NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
8EL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
N02/N03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/n03 &
nh3
8EL Analytes: N03N02N
1212130-002A MW-37 _12052012 12/5/20121310h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1212130-002B 300.0-W ~ df-we
8EL Analytes: CL F 804
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-we
8EL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1212130-002C TOS-W-2540C ~ ww -tds
8EL Analytes: TD8
1212130-0020 NH3-W-350.1 ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
8EL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR ~ df-
n02/n03 &
nh3
N02/N03-W-~ df-
353.2 n02/n03 &
nb3
8EL Analytes: N03N02N
1212130-003A Trip Blank 12/5/2012 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M G}' RT ~ CN ~ TAT [6'" QC if HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ COC Emailed ..pl. Itji/rfL/
American West Analytical Laboratories Chain of Custody Lab Sample Set # (Alb /;.(\
» Client:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 s. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Project Name: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
PO#:
Contact:
Phone:
Email:
Garrin Palmer
[phone]
[e-mail]
Comments
6 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1
7 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
8. 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •
9. . . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •
Special Instructions: Email results to Tanner Holliday, Kethy Weinel, and David Turk
Relinquished by: Signature-) 11 j'~ L . .I\ Date: Received rhature
~ I/lllJ1 Or.. 1:2/1;,/2.D I 'J
Print Name ~nnt"'r J+,,1I1~t\L,j V Time: Pri7me l1co
Relinquished by: Signature ~ Date: / lReceived by: Signature
Print Name Time: / Print Name
/
Relinquished by: Signature Date: / Received by: Signature~~ ~
Print Name Time: / Print Name LI!th~ I-f~~k /'
d'
Page 1 of 1
QC Level: 3
Turn Around TIme
Standard
Date;
Time:
Date:
Time:
Da1i... -7-/L
Time: 1([1"1-
i
I
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TOX
TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Frequency:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
Preservation Check Sheet
Preservative All ~ 1=Yf'",nt --=""""1-" I...I\V"'I-"
OK / ~
pH <2 I-hS04 Vt:!'f v~
pH <2 H2SO4 I I
PH >12 NaOH
pH <2 HN03
pH <2 H2S04 Ydi yeS
pH <2 H2SO4 1/
pH <2 HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH> 9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2H3P04
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 HCL
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
".. c./\vt::v -r
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
AU samples requiring preservation
Sample Set: (g /1... / ~ 0
r. f:lI(,pnt ~ 't-,-1\1"",1-" ~ (1f'r/t~
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
AmericanWest Blanding, UT 84511
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
TEL: [phone]
RE: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1212308
American West Analytical Laboratories received 3 sample(s) on 12/14/2012 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Association Conference (NELAC) Institute in Utah and Texas;
and is state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri. In addition,
A W AL is also accredited by the American Analytical Laboratory Association (A2LA) on
ISO IEC 17025:2005, Department of Defense (DOD), UST for the State of Wyoming, and
the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). All analyses were
performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute andlor A2LA protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
12/27/2012: This is a revision to a report originally issued 12/26/2012. Pages 1 and 9 have
been revised.
12/28/2012. Pages 1 and 2 have been revised
Thank You, Digitally signed by Jose G.
G Rocha
DN: cn=Jose G. Rocha,
• o=American West Analytical
. Laboratories, ou=Quality
Jose
Rocha· Assurance Officer,
email=[e-mail].
c=US
Date: 2012. {2.28 10:52:02 Approved by: ~ _____________ -0_7'_00_' ________ ~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: / 12/28/2012 Page 1 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee, Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, pro,motion or sale.of any product or pro~ess, orin connection with the re,-publication of t~isreport for any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West Client:
ANALYTICAL LABORATOHIES Project:
Lab Set ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Semiannual Groundwater 2012
1212308
Date Received: 1211412012 1000h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
463 West 3600 South
1212308-001A ~W-19 12132012 1211312012 0800h
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
1212308-001B ~W-19 12132012 12/13/2012 0800h
1212308-001B ~W-19 12132012 12/13/2012 0800h
Phone: [phone] 1212308-001C ~W-19 12132012 12/13/2012 0800h
Toll Free: [phone] 1212308-001D ~W-19 12132012 12/13/2012 0800h
Fax: [phone] 1212308-001D ~W-19 12132012 12/13/2012 0800h
~-mail: [e-mail] 1212308-002A ~W-20 12122012 12/12/2012 1210h
web: www.awal-Iabs.com 1212308-002B ~W-20 12122012 12/12/2012 1210h
1212308-002B ~W-20 12122012 12/12/2012 1210h
1212308-002C ~W-20 12122012 1211212012 1210h
Kyle F. Gross 1212308-002D ~W-20 12122012 1211212012 1210h
Laboratory Director 1212308-002D ~W-20 12122012 12/12/2012 1210h
1212308-003A Trip Blank 12112/2012
Jose Rocha
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Matrix Analysis
Aqueous VOA by GC/~S ~ethod
8260C/5030C
Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Aqueous VOA by GCMS ~ethod
8260C/5030C
Aqueous Alkalinityl Bicarbonatel
Carbonate, A2320B
Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Aqueous VOA by GC/~S ~ethod
8260C/5030C
QA Officer Reissue of a previously generated report. The date collectedfor sample 1212308-003A (Trip Blank) has been corrected. Information herein
supersedes that of previously issued reports.
Report Date: 12/28/2012 Page 2 of 18
All analyses applicable to. the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfo.nned in acco.rdance to. NELAC proto.Co.ls. Pertinent sampling info.nnatio.n is lo.cated o.n the attached COc. This repo.rt is provided fo.r the exclusive use o.fthe addressee. Privileges o.f
subsequent use o.f the name o.f this co.mpany o.r any. member o.f its staff, o.r repro.ductio.n o.f this repo.rt in. c?nnectio.n v-:ith the advertisement, promo.tio.n o.r sale of any product o.r process, o.r in co.nnectio.n with the re.-publicatio.n o.f this repo.rt fo.r any
Inorganic Case Narrative
American West Client: ANAI.YT ICAL LABORATOR I ES Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Semiannual Groundwater 2012
1212308
12114/2012
12112 & 12113/2012
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicates (MSIMSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions: The MS and MSD percent recoveries were outside of control
limits on chloride and sulfate due to matrix interference for sample 1212308-001B.
Duplicate (DUP): The parameters that required a duplicate analysis had RPDs
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 12/26/2012 Page 3 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this com~any or any. member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
Semiannual Groundwater 2012
1212308
12/14/2012
12112 & 12/13/2012
Intact
None
SW -846 8260CIS030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: No target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 12/26/2012 Page 4 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequ~nt use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c~nnection \\lith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication oft~isreport for any
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212308
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1212308-001 CDUP Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
mgIL SM2540C
Result
1,250
Amount
Spiked
Dept: WC
QC Type: DUP
Original
Amount
1,300
%REC Limits %RPD
3.76
RPD
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Limit Qual Date Analyzed
5 12/14/2012 1245h
Report Date: 12/26/2012 Page 10 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANA LYTICAL LABORATORI ES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212308
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS-R48536 Chloride
LCS-R48536 Sulfate
LCS-R48580 Fluoride
LCS-R48643 Alkalinity (as CaC03)
LCS-22757 Ammonia (as N)
LCS-R48625 NitratelNitrite (as N)
LCS-R48487 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mgIL E300.0 4.77 5.000 0 95.5 90-110
mgIL E300.0 5.08 5.000 0 102 90-110
mgIL E300.0 4.68 5.000 0 93.7 90-110
mgIL SM2320B 52,800 50,000 0 106 90-110
mglL E350.1 1.06 1.000 0 lO6 90-110
mglL E353.2 1.05 1.000 0 105 90-110
mgIL SM2540C 192 205.0 0 93.7 80-120
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/1712012 1440h
12117/2012 1440h
12/18/2012 1254h
1212012012 0641h
1211812012 1846h
12/1912012 1603h
12/1412012 1245h
Report Date: 12/26/2012 Page 11 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
-rober of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTI CAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212308
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB-R48536 Chloride
MB-R48536 Sulfate
MB-R48580 Fluoride
MB-R48643 Bicarbonate (as CaC03)
MB-R48643 Carbonate (as CaC03)
MB-22757 Ammonia (as N)
MB-R48625 NitratelNitrite (as N)
MB-R48487 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mgIL E300.0 < 1.00
mglL E300.0 < 1.00
mglL E300.0 < 0.100
mglL SM2320B < 1.00
mglL SM2320B < 1.00
mglL E350.1 < 0.0500
mglL E353.2 < 0.100
mglL SM2540C < 10.0
RPD
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
12117/2012 1353h
12117120121353h
12118/2012 1231h
12/20/2012 0641 h
12/2012012 0641 h
12118/2012 1844h
12119/2012 1602h
12114/2012 1245h
Report Date: 12/26/2012 Page 12 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SOW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LA8 0 RATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212308
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1212308-001BMS Chloride
1212308-001 BMS Sulfate
1212308-001BMS Fluoride
1212308-002BMS Alkalinity (as CaC03)
1212308-001DMS Ammonia (as N)
1212308-001DMS NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mgIL E300.0 4,280 5,000 35.44 85.0 90-110
mgIL E300.0 5,090 5,000 759.3 86.7 90-110
mgIL E300.0 502 500.0 0.9720 100 90-110
mg/L SM2320B 79.7 50.00 31.30 96.8 80-120
mg/L E350.1 0.994 1.000 0 99.4 90-110
mg/L E353.2 14.7 10.00 3.958 108 90-110
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/1712012 1549h
12117/2012 1549h
12/1912012 0426h
12/2012012 0641 h
1211812012 1849h
12/19/2012 1616h
Report Date: 12/26/2012 Page 13 ofl8
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212308
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1212308-001BMSD Chloride
1212308-001BMSD Sulfate
1212308-001BMSD Fluoride
1212308-002BMSD Alkalinity (as CaC03)
1212308-001DMSD Ammonia (as N)
1212308-001DMSD NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 4,330 5,000 35.44 86.0 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5,150 5,000 759.3 87.8 90-110
mg/L E300.0 482 500.0 0.9720 96.2 90-110
mg/L SM2320B 77.9 50.00 31.30 93.2 80-120
mg/L E350.1 1.01 1.000 0 101 90-110
mg/L E353.2 14.4 10.00 3.958 104 90-110
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
%RPD
1.12
1.13
4.04
2.28
1.71
2.49
RPD
Limit
20
20
20
10
10
10
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12117/2012 1613h
12/17/2012 1613h
12/19/2012 0449h
12/20/2012 0641 h
12/18/2012 1850h
12/19/2012 1617h
Report Date: 12/26/20 I 2 Page 14 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no resporisibility
American West
ANA LYT!CAL LABO RATOR I ES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212308
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS VOC 121412A Benzene
LCS VOC 121412A Chloroform
LCS VOC 121412A Methylene chloride
LCS VOC 121412A Naphthalene
LCS VOC 121412A Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 121412A Toluene
LCS VOC 121412A Xylenes, Total
LCSVOC 121412A SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
LCS VOC 121412A SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 121412A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 121412A SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
OC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
JlglL SW8260C 19.9 20.00 0 99.3 62-127
IlglL SW8260C 20.6 20.00 0 103 67-132
JlglL SW8260C 19.1 20.00 0 95.4 32-185
JlglL SW8260C 19.1 20.00 0 95.4 28-136
JlglL SW8260C 17.8 20.00 0 89.2 43-146
JlglL SW8260C 19.8 20.00 0 99.0 64-128
JlglL SW8260C 61.0 60.00 0 102 52-134
%REC SW8260C 51.4 50.00 103 76-138
%REC SW8260C 46.5 50.00 93.0 77-121
%REC SW8260C 50.7 50.00 101 67-128
%REC SW8260C 47.8 50.00 95.6 81-135
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/14120120816h
12114/20120816h
12114/2012 0816h
12114/20120816h
12114120120816h
12114120120816h
12114120120816h
12114/2012 0816h
12114/20120816h
12/14120120816h
12/14120120816h
Report Date: 12/26/2012 Page 15 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTICAL LA80RATOfifES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212308
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 121412A 2-Butanone
MB VOC 121412A Acetone
MB VOC 121412A Benzene
MB VOC 121412A Carbon tetrachloride
MB VOC 121412A Chloroform
MB VOC 121412A Chloromethane
MB VOC 121412A Methylene chloride
MB VOC 121412A Naphthalene
MB VOC 121412A Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 121412A Toluene
MB VOC 121412A Xy1enes, Total
MB VOC 121412A SUIT: 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 .
MB VOC 121412A SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 121412A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 121412A SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlglL SW8260C <20.0
IlglL SW8260C <20.0
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1;00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
%REC SW8260C 53.4 50.00 107 76-138
%REC SW8260C 48.0 50.00 96.0 77-121
%REC SW8260C 50.5 50.00 101 67-128
%REC SW8260C 48.7 50.00 97.5 81-135
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1211412012 0854h
12114/20120854h
12/14120120854h
12/1412012 0854h
1211412012 0854h
12/14/2012 0854h
1211412012 0854h
12/1412012 0854h
12/14/2012 0854h
12114/2012 0854h
1211412012 0854h
1211412012 0854h
1211412012 0854h
12114/2012 0854h
1211412012 0854h
Report Date: 12/26/2012 Page 16 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached coe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reprod\uction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no res,P0nsibility
American West
ANALYTI CAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212308
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1212308-001AMS Benzene
1212308-001AMS Chloroform
1212308-001AMS Methylene chloride
1212308-001AMS Naphthalene
1212308-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
1212308-001 AMS Toluene
1212308-001AMS Xy1enes, Total
1212308-001 AMS SUIT: 1,2-Dich1oroethane-d4
1212308-001AMS SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1212308-001AMS SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1212308-001 AMS SUIT: To1uene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
/lg/L SW8260C 18.0 20.00 0 90.1 66-145
/lg/L SW8260C 18.9 20.00 0 94.6 50-146
/lg/L SW8260C 17.2 20.00 0 85.9 30-192
/lg/L SW8260C 17.2 20.00 0 85.8 41-131
/lg/L SW8260C 18.2 20.00 0 91.1 43-146
/lg/L SW8260C 17.5 20.00 0 87.5 18-192
/lg/L SW8260C 54.3 60.00 0 90.5 42-167
%REC SW8260C 54.4 50.00 109 72-151
%REC SW8260C 46.8 50.00 93.7 80-128
%REC SW8260C 51.6 50.00 103 80-124
%REC SW8260C 47.1 50.00 94.2 77-129
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/14/2012 1406h
1211412012 1406h
12/14/2012 1406h
1211412012 1406h
12/14/2012 1406h
12/1412012 1406h
12114/2012 1406h
12114/2012 1406h
12114/2012 1406h
12114/2012 1406h
12114/2012 1406h
Report Date: 12/26/2012 Page 17 ofl8
! analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTICAL LABOl<ATOl'llES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212308
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1212308.:001 AMSD Benzene
1212308-001 AMSD Chloroform
1212308-001 AMSD Methylene chloride
1212308-001 AMSD Naphthalene
1212308-001AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
1212308-001AMSD Toluene
1212308-001AMSD Xylenes, Total
1212308-001AMSD Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1212308-001AMSD Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1212308-001AMSD Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
1212308-001AMSD Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlglL SW8260C 19.0 20.00 0 -94.9 66-145
IlglL SW8260C 20.1 20.00 0 101 50-146
IlglL SW8260C 18.2 20.00 0 90.8 30-192
IlglL SW8260C 18.1 20.00 0 90.7 41-131
IlglL SW8260C 17.9 20.00 0 89.3 43-146
IlglL SW8260C 18.6 20.00 0 92.8 18-192
IlglL SW8260C 57.4 60.00 0 95.7 42-167
%REC SW8260C 54.3 50.00 109 72-151
%REC SW8260C 45.8 50.00 91.5 80-128
%REC SW8260C 51.4 50.00 103 80-124
%REC SW8260C 47.0 50.00 93.9 77-129
%RPD
5.24
6.15
5.55
5.55
1.94
5.93
5.62
RPD
Limit
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12114/2012 1425h
12114/2012 1425h
1211412012 1425h
12/1412012 1425h
1211412012 1425h
1211412012 1425h
1211412012 1425h
12/14/2012 1425h
12/1412012 1425h
1211412012 1425h
12/1412012 1425h
Report Date: 1212612012 Page 18 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any pm'Pose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
REVISED
American West Analytical Laboratories I 12-27-12 UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary Collection Date on Trip Blank corrected -RW
1212308 Work Order:
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 1 of 1 1212712012
Client ID: DENI00 Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012 QC Level: LEVEL III WOType: Project
Comments: P A Rush. QC 3 & Summary. Project specific DL's: see COCo EDD-Denison. Email Group.;
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1212308-001A 11VV-19_12132012 12/13/20120800h 12114/2012 1000h 12/26/2012 Aqueous 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge 3
1212308-001B 300.0-VV ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-VV-2320B ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1212308-001C TDS-VV-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1212308-001D NH3-VV-350.1 ~ df-
no2/no3 &
nh3
SEL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-VV-PR ~ df-
no2/no3 &
nh3
N02/N03-VV-~ df-
353.2 no2/no3 &
nh3
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1212308-002A 11VV-20 12122012 12/12120121210h 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge 3
1212308-002B 300.0-VV ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-VV-2320B ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1212308-002C TDS-VV-2540C ~ ww -tds
SEL Analytes: TDS
1212308-002D NH3-VV-350.1 ~ df-
no2/no3 &
nh3
SEL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-VV-PR ~ df-
no2/no3 &
nh3
N02/N03-VV-~ df-
353.2 no2/no3 &
nh3
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1212308-003A Trip Blank 12/12/2012 8260-VV ~ VOCFridge 3
American West Analytical Laboratories
Sample ID:
Client:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 s. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Project Name: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
PO#:
Sampler Name:~t\e.' Uo\\~ a 0...
---'"-t
0 0f~ cY) I-.. (/) 'B li)
0 M ~ CJ n.> i:: cd ('I) a 'til ~ 0 fT5 ~ 0 .!:l ~ :!. U Pot ...... ~ a ('I) ......
Date Sampled I Time L~
G' g
~
III 0
Chain of Custody
Contact:
Phone:
Email:
C3' 0 cY)
I-.. 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ li) ~ ~ G' = ~ a 0 ~ ,g CIJ ~ j:Q
c:f ......
CIJ of ~ CIS
Lab Sample Set # I 2, \ Z;7;)Q'&
Garrin Palmer
[phone]
[e-mail]
Comments
Page 1 of 1
QC Level: 3
Turn Around Time
Standard
~ g r;; CfJ ~ E-t 0
'f.. )<. 1< "X X >< IPM
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 I
Special Instructions: Email results to Tanner Holliday, Kethy Weinel, and David Turk .... ".",~­
~.;'
.. ,~ ••. r-""\~;"
Relinquished by: Signatur::..:;, (~J"t. ~..II~, _ Date: lZ! \:"5,/20 (2-. Received by: Signatu:/ Date:
Print Name ~ II 1i I. , \.J Time: 1\' A Print Name .... ./ Time: ~ !li\.yW\e.,f" 11<1 111 dllU\ OU./
Relinquished by: Signature '-' Date: Recei.,d'by: Signature Date:
./
Print Name Time: Print Name Time:
/./
RelmqUlshed by: Signature Date: /. Received~ ~Y~l M ~u.. "'-""1 ) Date: \ "'2.1 t 41 f 2--
Print Name Time: / Print Name ~~ . ,~,_ '''r5 . . Time: i' .1. ,,!.;:'\
, •. F J~ \ '"::J2. ~"\A. \. ok, ~ Ir""\ " L..JU
,~/
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 & N03
Nutrients
0&0
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TOX
TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
S Ie Set E
Preservative All ~t ~-except except
OK ~{ f-OO'&
pH <2 H2SO4 '-l Ps \l·~S
pH <2 H2SO4 ~ I
PH>12 NaOH
pH <2 HN03
pH <2 H2SO4 ~? \lOb
pH <2 H2SO4
, r
pH<2HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH> 9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H3P04
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 HCL
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample 'fl:om Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
CI'.\jt:lJl r . J:"Vl"o':'t -"'''''1-'
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
Sample Set: V"L\23015
!=vl"'ont !=v""nt r::XGepl ~ te '2(ltil~
American West
ANALYTI CAL LAB ORATORI I:S
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 South Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Dear Kathy Weinel: Lab Set ID: 1301421
American West Analytical Laboratories received 7 sample( s) on 1122/2013 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
This is a revision to a report originally issued 1125/2013. A case narrative has been added
and the analyte list has been updated. All pages have been updated for pagination.
Thank You,
Approved by: ~ ______ =-______________ ~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 1/30/2013 Page 1 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SOW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCO This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of t~e name of this comp'~ny or any.llle~ber of its sta!'!? or reproduction of this report in. ~~nnection v:ith !he adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale .of any rroduct or pro_cess, or in co~ection ~ith ~he re_-~ublic~tion ~f ~is report for any .
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Date Received:
Lab Sample ID
1301421-001A
1301421-002A
1301421-003A
1301421-004A
1301421-005A
1301421-006A
1301421-007A
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Kathy Weinel
Semiannual Groundwater 2012
1301421
1122/2013 0930h
Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
MW-25 11122012 11112/2012 1308h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Total
MW-27 11132012 11113/2012 1305h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Total
MW-28 11142012 11114/2012 1100h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Total
MW-30 11132012 11113/2012 1140h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Total
MW-35 11132012 11113/2012 1345h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Total
MW-22 11262012 11126/2012 1300h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Total
MW-37 12052012 12/5/2012 1310h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Total
Report Date: 1130/2013 Page 2 of15
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e name ?~ this comp'any or any. me~ber of its sta~ or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection v:ith ~he adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale .of any product or pro~e~s, or in co~ection ~ith the re_-p'ublic~tion of ~his report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Kathy Weinel
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Semi Annual Groundwater 2012
1301421
1122/2013
11112-12/5/2012
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, LCSD, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample 1 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS/LCSD): All
LCS and LCSD recoveries were within control limits, indicating that the
preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): Insufficient sample volume
was received to perform a MS/MSD on a sample from Lab Set ID 130142l.
MSIMSD was performed on another client's sample. All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Corrective Action: N one required.
Report Date: 1/30/2013 Page 3 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequen~ use. of t~e n~e of this comp'~ny or any. me~ber of its sta~ or reproduction of this report in. c~nnection v:ith the adverti~ement, pro_motion or sale .of any product or pro::e~s, or. in coru:ection ~ith the re_-~ublic~tion ?f ~his report for any
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1301421
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS-23337 I Tin
LCS-23337 Iron
LCS-23337 . Molybdenum
LCS-23337 Zinc
LCS-23337 Arsenic
LCS-23337 Manganese
LCS-23396 Arsenic
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Kathy Weinel
Dept: ME
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mglL E200.8 1.04 1.000 0 104 85-115
mg/L E200.8 1.06 1.000 0 106 85-115
mglL E200.8 0.200 0.2000 0 100 85-115
mg/L E200.8 1.03 1.000 0 103 85-115
mg/L E200.8 0.224 0.2000 0 112 85-115
mglL E200.8 0.206 0.2000 0 103 85-115
mglL E200.8 0.218 0.2000 0 109 85-115
/\ -Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Iriformation herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1123/2013 2020h
112312013 1723h
1123/2013 1723h
1123/2013 1723h
1124/2013 1312h
1124/2013 1834h
1\ 1129/2013 111 7h
Report Date: 1/30/2013 Page 11 of 15
1 analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
:mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1301421
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCSD-23396 Arsenic
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Kathy Weinel
Units Method
mg/L E200.8
Result
0.214
Amount
Spiked
0.2000
Dept: ME
QC Type: LCSD
Original
Amount
o
%REC
107
Limits
85-115
1\ _ Reissue of a previously gererated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
LCSD-23396: Insufficient sample mass/volume was received to perform MS/MSD analysis. An LCSD was added to provide precision data.
I I
%RPD
1.67
RPD
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Limit Qual Date Analyzed
20 /\ 1129/2013 1125h
Report Date: 1130/2013 Page 12 of 15
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
:rober of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1301421
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB-23337 Tin
MB-23337 Iron
MB-23337 Molybdenum
MB-23337 Zinc
MB-23337 . Arsenic
MB-23337 Manganese
MB-23396 Arsenic
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80l) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Kathy Weinel
Dept: ME
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E200.8 < 0.100
mg/L E200.8 < 0.0300
mg/L E200.8 < 0.0100
mg/L E200.8 < 0.0100
mgIL E200.8 < 0.00500
mg/L E200.8 < 0.0100
mgIL E200.8 < 0.00500
/\ -Reissue of a previously generated report. lriformation has been added, updated, or revised. lriformation herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1123/2013 201 Oh
1123/2013 1718h
1123/2013 1718h
1/23/2013 1718h
1/24/2013 1309h
1124/2013 1829h
/\ 1/29/2013 1109h
Report Date: 1130/2013 Page 13 of 15
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
:mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1301421
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1301455-001AMS Tin
1301455-001AMS Iron
1301455-001AMS I Molybdenum
1301455-001AMS Zinc
1301455-001AMS Arsenic
1301455-001AMS . Iron
1301455-001AMS Manganese
· 463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Kathy Weinel
Dept: ME
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E200.8 1.03 1.000 0.0004140 103 75-125
mg/L E200.8 2.69 1.000 1.640 105 75-125
mglL E200.8 0.221 0.2000 0.02204 99.7 75-125
mglL E200.8 1.04 1.000 0.01622 102 75-125
mg/L E200.8 0.304 0.2000 0.08333 110 75-125
mg/L E200.8 2.62 1.000 1.599 102 75-125
mg/L E200.8 0.253 0.2000 0.04972 102 75-125
Reissue of a previously generated report. lriformation has been added, updated, or revised. lriformation herein supersedes that of previously issued reports.
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
112312013 2134h
1/23/2013 1744h
1123/2013 1744h
1123/2013 1744h
1124/2013 13 17h
1124/2013 1938h
112412013 1845h
Report Date: 1/30/2013 Page 14 of 15
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
:mber of its staff, orreproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1301421
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1301455-001AMSD Tin
1301455-001AMSD Iron
1301455-001AMSD Molybdenum
1301455-001AMSD I Zinc
1301455-001AMSD !ArseniC
1301455-001AMSD ~Iron
1301455-001AMSD Manganese
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Kathy Weinel
Dept: ME
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mgIL E200.8 1.02 1.000 0.0004140 102 75-125
mg/L E200.8 2.63 1.000 1.640 98.6 75-125
mg/L E200.8 0.213 0.2000 0.02204 95.5 75-125
mg/L E200.8 1.03 1.000 0.01622 102 75-125
mg/L E200.8 0.297 0.2000 0.08333 107 75-125
mg/L E200.8 2.53 1.000 1.599 92.9 75-125
mg/L E200.8 0.247 0.2000 0.04972 98.7 75-125
Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Iriformation herein supersedes that of previously issued reports.
%RPD
1.34
2.41
3.89
0.846
2.37
3.43
2.33
RPD
Limit
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1123/2013 2144h
1123/2013 1750h
1123/2013 1750h
1123/2013 1750h
1/24/2013 1320h
1/24/2013 1943h
1124/2013 1850h
Report Date: 1/30/2013 Page 15 of 15
1 analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached CDC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
:mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
REVISED
American West Analytical Laboratories 1-30-13 UL
Client updated analyte list -RW Denison
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1301421 Page 1 of 1
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 1125/2013
Client ID: DENI00 Contact: Kathy Weinel
Project: Semiannual Groundwater 2012 QC Level: III WO Type: Standard
Comments: 3 Day Rush. QC 3 (no chromatograms). Special DL's. EDD-Denison.;
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1301421-001A ~VV-25_11122012 11112/2012 1308h 1122/2013 0930h 200.S-VV Aqueous ~ df/ metals
1 SEL Analytes: SN
200.S-VV-PR D df/ metals
1301421-002A ~VV-27_11132012 11113/2012 1305h 1/22/20130930h 200.S-VV Aqueous ~ df/ metals
1 SEL Analytes: SN
200.S-VV-PR D df/ metals
1301421-003A lYIVV-2S_11142012 11114/20121100h 112212013 0930h 200.S-VV Aqueous ~ df/ metals
3 SEL Analytes: MO SN ZN
200.S-VV-PR D df/ metals
1301421-004A MVV-30_11132012 11113/20121140h 1I22/20130930h 200.S-VV Aqueous ~ df/ metals
1 SEL Analytes: SN
200.S-VV-PR D df/metals
1301421-005A ~VV-35_11132012 11113/2012 1345h 1122/2013 0930h 200.S-VV Aqueous ~ df/ metals
2 SEL Analytes: SN ZN
200.S-VV-PR D df / metals
1301421-006A ~VV -22 _11262012 11/26/2012 1300h 1122/2013 0930h 200.7-VV Aqueous ~ df / metals
o SEL Analytes:
200.7-VV-PR D df/metals
200.S-VV ~ df/ metals
1 SEL Analytes: AS
200.S-VV-PR D df/ metals
1301421-007A ~VV-37 _12052012 12/5/20121310h 112212013 0930h 200.7-VV Aqueous ~ df/ metals
o SEL Analytes:
200.7-VV-PR D df/ metals
200.S-VV ~ df/ metals
1 SEL Analytes: FE MN MO SN ZN
200.S-VV-PR D dfl metals
Printed: 1/30/20 l3
---J----,-I **See www.gel.com for GEL's Sample Acceptance SOP** GELQuote#: Charleston, SC 29407
COC Number (1): GEL Work Order Number: Phone: [phone] IJOIV"( PO Number: Fax: [phone]
Client Name: Energy Fuels Phone#: Sample Analysis Requested (5) (Fill in the number of containers for each test)
Project/Site Name: White Mesa Mill Fax#: fIl Z <--Preservative Type (6) Iil 3 Q)
Comments: Samples from GEL Laboratories .s = ~ Q
~ Comments .... i Collected by: NA Send Results to Kathy Weinel Q Note: extra sample is Iil ,.Q ~ required for sample ~ .... Sampl ~
"'Date Collected "'Time Collected QC Field Q.. specific QC Energy Fuels Sample ID GEL sample ID e til (Military) Code Filtered Matri ] '3
5L'e ~lkd.~j * For composites -indicate start and stop date/time (mm-dd-yy) (bhmm) (1) (3) Q ~ x (4) ~ :E
315400003 \ RL/ ... !(
MW-25 11122012 11/12/2012 1308 n y GW 1 X -~ Sn
MW-27 11132012 315400005 1111312012 1305 n y GW 1 X \ Sn
MW-28 11142012 315400006 11114/2012 1100 n y GW 1 X \ Zn,Sn
MW-30 11132012 315400008 11113/2012 1140 n y GW 1 x· \ Sn
MW-35 11132012 315400009 11113/2012 1345 n y GW 1 X ~n,Sn
I 315987010 \s MW-22 I 11262012 11126/2012 1300 n y GW 1 X
MW-37_12052012 316515002 12/512012 1310 n y GW 1 X Fe, Mn, ~o, Zn
\
\
\
TAT Requested: Normal: Rush: x Specify: (Subject to Surcharge) IFax Results: Yes / No Circle Deliverable: C of A / QC Summ~ / Levell / Leve12 / Level3 / Level4
Remarks: Are there any known hazards applicable to these samples? If so, please list the hazards. Samule Collection Time Zone
Comments: Samples are aliquots taken from the parent container. Eastern Pacific
Central Other
Mountain
Chain of Custody Signatures Sample Shipping and Delivery Details
I~ ~-m d{ ~:hl0 r (.,c{:
Received by (signed) Date Time 1··<W~::~l!;,i~:'<i':",·;:;"" ;.,:;;~,A.; ,~~ ;"',' >i,'i ";",.f:i;::;,<:.;,,. ; ,,-,;;; ", ",: >f-'i';;>:';'<"~j,~:).~;;';:;'~,: :';, f'>',,; .;:-:,
,'c, ;.:<:: "::"" '~',': ''''''':';:';'''''':;;~::'':''>'
~ / '" Method of Shipment: Date Shipped:
'-""-/ -16~.{fL ---/ 1-1.'L-13 2 c:r')G Airbill #:
'" I V q -I 3 3 Airbill #:
1.) Chain of Custody Number c Client Determined For Lab Receiving Use Only 2.) QC Codes: N = Nonna! Sample, TB = Trip Blank, FD = Field Duplicate, EB = Equipment Blank, MS = Matrix Spike Sample, MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate Sample, G = Grab, C = Composite
3.) Field Filtered: For liquid matrices, indicate with a - Y • for yes the sample was field filtered or - N -for sample was not field filtered. Custodrl Intact?
4.) Matrix Codes: DW=Drlnking W~ter, GW=Groundwater, SW=Surface Water, WW=Waste Water, W=Water, ML=Misc Uquid, SO=Soil, SD=Sediment, SL=Sludge, SS=Solid Waste, O=Oil, F=Filter, P=Wipe, U=Urine, F==Fecal, N=Nasal YES NO
5.) Sample Analysis Requested: An~ytiCal method requested (i.e. 8260B, 6010Bn470A) and number of containers provided for each (i.e. 8260B -3, 6010Bf7470A -1). Cooler Temp:
6.) Preservative Type: HA == Hydrochloric Acid, NI == Nitric Acid, SH == Sodium Hydroxide, SA = Sulfuric Acid, AA = Ascorbic Acid, HX == Hexane, ST = Sodium Thiosulfate, If no preservative is added == leave field blank C
SENIOR CHEMIST/MARKETING MANAGER
TEL: (801) OR [phone]
CELL: [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]
AMERICAN WEST ANAL YT[CAL LABORATORIES
463 W. 3600 S.
SAL TLAKE CITY, UT 841 15
www.awal-Iabs.com
From: Kathy Weinel [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 2: 12 PM
To: Pat Noteboom; Rebekah Winkler
Cc: Jaime Massey
Subject: Metals samples from GEL labs
Pat and Rebekah,
Below are the particulars for the samples you will receive from GEL:
7 samples -groundwater -you analyzed these samples for anions and wet chems -if you need those results you will
already have them in house.
RLs -were sent in a separate e-mail
Must report to RLs ~ no dilutions with raised RLs and NO values -can dilute and report dilution IF the reported value is
above the raised RL.
Samples and analytes:
M~-22(Gel number315987-010)--~FU~I ~ls:u:he~~met:a:ls~~~o~~~.~~~~~~~'~s;,e~~~~~lrf··'~~~\~k~J~~~~~'~~~~ M~-37 (Gel number 316515-002) =-~~II 3t1ite tiletals I '~3 'I) -~ MW-22 & MW-37 updated
M~-25 (Gel number 315400-003) -Tin 1129/13, per Kathy Weinel.
M~-27 (Gel number 315400 -005) -Tin * MW-22 -As
M~-28 (Gel number 315400 -006) -Molybdenum, Zinc, Tin * MW-37 -Fe, Mn, Mo, Zn
MW-30 (Gel number 315400-008) -Tin -RW
MW-35 (Gel number 315400 -009) -Zinc, Tin
These samples go into Locus.
)
Same package that I always get -QC2+ (I think). a c..J
KA~
Energy Fuels Resources (USA)./nc.
3
Elona Hayward
From:
Sent:
To:
Kathy Weinel [[e-mail]]
Tuesday, January 22,2013 10:29 AM
Elona Hayward
Subject: RE: samples received today
Elona,
Please use the e-mail that I sent to Pat rather than the COC for the list of analytes. I wanted extra metals that GEL was
not aware of.
k
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
t: 303-389-4134 I f: 303-389-4125
225 Union Blvd., Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
http://www.energyfuels.com
This e-mail is intended for the exclusive usetheofperson(s) mentioned as the recipient(s). This message and any attached files with it are confidential and may
contain privileged or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s) please delete this message and notify the sender. You may not use, distribute
print or copy this message if you are not the intended recipient(s).
From: Elona Hayward [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22[ 2013 10:09 AM
To: Kathy Weinel
Subject: samples received today
Good Morning Kathy,
We just received the samples from GEL.
Their chain is different than your email to Pat. I am sending it to you and you can advise as to how I should check it in.
Thanks you for your help on this.
Elona Hayward
SAMPLE RECEIVING COORDINATOR
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 W. 3600 s.
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84115
1
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]
Visit us at our NEW web site: www.awal-Iabs.com
Notice of confidentiality. This transmission is attorney client privileged and intended exclusively for the stated addressee. If received accidentally, please notify the
sender immediately. Reproduction, distribution, and dissemination of this information are strictly prohibited by anyone other than the intended.
2
Table 1
Contaminant Analytical Reporting Maximum Sample Sample
Methods Limit! Holding Preservation Temperature
~{J to be Used Times Requirements Requirements
Nutrients
~ ,~ A4500-0.05 mg/L 28 days H2S04 to ~6°C
NH3 Gor pH<2
E350.1
Nitrate & Nitrite ~or 0.1 mg/L 28 days H2S04 to ~6°C
(asN) E353.2' !----pH<2
--------.,..
Heavy Metals \1-,< {! :,)~ck-~ ,+d"s----
Arsenic E200.7 or 5/-!g/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Beryllium E200~7 or 0.50/-!g/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Cadmium E200.7 or 0.50 /-!g/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Chromium E200.7 or 25 /-!g/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Cobalt E200.7 or 10/-!g/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Copper E200.7 or 10/-!g/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Iron E200.7 or 30/-!g/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.7
Lead E200.7 or 1.0 Jlg/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Manganese E200.7 or 10/-!g/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Mercury E 245.1 or 0.50 Jlg/L 28 days HN03topH<2 None
E200.7 or
E200.8
Molybdenum E200.7 or 10/-!g/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Nickel E200.7 or 20 Jlg/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Selenium E200.7 or 5/-!g/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Silver E200.7 or 10 Jlg/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Thallium E200.7 or 0.50 Jlg/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Tin E200.7 or 100 ~g/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
~ Contaminant Analytical Reporting Maximum Sample Sample
Methods Limitl Holding Preservation Temperature
to be Used Times Requirements Requirements
Uranium E200.7 or . 0.30 Jlg/L 6 months HN03 topH<2 None
E200.8
Vanadium E200.7 or 15 Jlg/L 6 months HN03topH<2 None
E200.8
Zinc E200.7 or 10 JlglL 6 months HN03to pH<2 None
E200.8
~ ~adiologics
~AlPha E 900.0 or 1.0 pCifL 6 months HN03 topH<2 None
E900.1
'" Volatile ~
Organic
Compounds
Acetone ~~OB 20 JlgfL 14 days HCI to pH<2 :s 6°C
or
SW 60C
Benzene SW8~~ 1.0 JlgfL 14 days HCI to pH<2 :s 6°C
or
SW8260C " 2-Butanone SW8260B ~ 14 days HCI to pH<2 :s 6°C
(MEK) or
SW8260C
Carbon SW8260B 1.01l~ 14 days HCI to pH<2 :s 6°C
Tetrachloride or
SW8260C \
Chloroform SW8260B 1.0 JlgfL
1\
HCI to pH<2 :s 6°C
or
SW8260C
Chloromethane SW8260B 1.0 JlgfL 14days\ HCI to pH<2 :s 6°C
or
SW8260C
Dichloromethane SW8260B 1.0 JlgfL 14 days \OPH<2 ::s 6°C
(Methylene or
Chloride} SW8260C
Naphthalene SW8260B 1.0 JlgfL 14 days HClt~ ::s 6°C
or
SW8260C
Tetrahydrofuran SW8260B 1.0 JlgfL 14 days HCltOPH<\, . ::s 6°C
or
SW8260C '" Toluene SW8260B 1.0 JlglL 14 days HCI to pH<2 ~~ or
,,~
--Page: I of I GEL Laboratories. LLC
Project #: GEL Chain of Custody and Analytical Request 2040 Savage Road
GEL Quote #: Charleston, SC 29407
COC Number (I): GEL Work Order Number: 5/5-il>D Phone: [phone]
PO Number: Fax: [phone]
Client Name: EOlj_~'-\ 1=v..e\~ Phone#: 43:5> bIg 2..2.21 Sample Analysis Requested (5) (Fill in the number of containers for each test)
Project/Site Name: s> 1 1 II> ~ Gf"O\N\~ \Ill ~er Fax#: Should this "" \-t <-Preservative Type (6) :2..011-~ eft'\ w\'1)""~ a: < "2
Hw'-'\ \'11
sample be ] '3 Address: f;,'12.S S t-" ~ u:\ K,-\SH considered: I: b\£N'\ :~~ e y 0 ::$''1 .... V\ Comments
Collected by: "'-:"'V\t'\ t..(" ",,\\;l~~ Send Results To: &~rr;1\ -R'\.\I"'le.( e ~ "CI "" dd Note: extra sample is ~ ~ .&:l 4:
I
·Time :; e ~ required for sample *Uate Collected cc = 1~ Sample ID Collected QCCode Field Sample ~ a: .... 't specific QC (Military) m Filtered IJI Matrix!~' < -; --t 0
(mm-dd-yy) tJ C \-• For composites -indicate start and stop date/time (hhmm) ~ r-~ ~
MW-ii-1\\2'2.012 U/12120\2 1330 '" 't GrW I ~ 'f..
M'Ai-\S-\i\4 20 i'J... I , \/\4/;U; ,2. 12:~S tV V &\IJ 1 ~ y:. ,
Mw-2.S_Ht2.;t()\~ ,VnJl2. )'30g N .J &-w 1 )( ,,' 1
MW 2~-1\\5201::l. \\/1~/12. 0730 ,J Y &w i 1--~ 4. -~,
I "I. ~-=>~ .
MW-27_ "}l 132D12 H/i3/12. ):30!; tV '( &-...,.J 1 'f.. ~ ...L
oJI """1~lf ~, .... ''''''''''
MW-1Z_1 \ Jl{2()12~ IH/1Ll/12.. HDC N '( (:ivJ 1 ''& ~
Mw-2..~_ H f42.()t1. DlllLi/l:l 1350 tV .J &vJ 1 X y.. -,
~W-30_1 1132tH"2. H/}3/J~ \\~() N .j &W \ ~ y.. \ I
M W -35 11 t32D \:2. \ \/'3.1 1:2.. 13'15 V Y ~ !
N \ &w 1
,MVU-3b_) \ l4~O12 ,\/}y/}-~ 01:]00 _,.J '-( (rw I ~ i-
TAT Requested: Nonnal: L Rush: Specify: (Subject to Surcharge) IFax Results: Yes I (NO) Circle Deliverable: C of A I _QC Summary. I Level t I Level 2 / Level 3 I Level 4
Remarks: Are there any known hazards applicable to these samples? If so, please list the hazards Samnle ~QII~tiQn Time ~ne
'J:~ cA"~ ~v.e~\ons ~D\;" \,(~1-h~ Eastern Pacific
G-DG Un vJe;()e..l ~I Other ---l"Mounta'in')
Chain of Custody Signatures Sample Shipping and Delivery Details
_ Relinquished By (Signed) Date Time Received by (signed) Date Time
~ 1{)JYYtl-
GEL PM:
0~.Jbab H/lsJ'1t>\2. HOO 1 II-/IP-i 'a itJ~45 Method of Shipment; Date Shipped:
2 2 Airbill #:
3 3 Airbill II:
1.) Chain of Custody Number'" Client Determined For Lab Receiving Use Only 2.) QC Codes: N = Nonnal Sample. TB = Trip Blank. FD'" Field Duplicate. EB .. Equipment Blank. MS'" Matrix Spike Sample. MSD "' Matrix Spike Duplicate Sample. G ,. Grab. C'" Composite
3.) field Filtered: For liquid matrices. indicate with a ~ V • lOr yes the sample was field filtered or • N • lOr sample was nOI field filtered. Custody Seal Intact?
4.) Matrix Codes; DW=DrinkingWater. GW=Groundw8ter. SW"Surface Water. WW=Waste Water. W"'WBler. SO=Soil. SO"Sediment. SL-Sludge. SS=Solid Waste. O=Oil. F=Filter, P=Wipe. U=Urine, F=Feeal. N=Nasal YES NO
S.} Sample Analysis Requested: Analytical method requested (i.e. 82608.601 OBn470A) and number or containers provided for each (i.e. 8260B ·3. 6010BIU70A • I). COO~Tem~:
6.) Preservative Type: HA -Hydrochloric Acid. Nt -Nhric Acid. SH -Sodium Hydroxide. SA -S\JI furic Acid: AA -Ascorbic: Acid. HX = Hexane. ST -Sodium Thiosulfate. If no preservative is added" leave field blank
WHITE = LABORATORY YELLOW = FILE PINK = CLIENT
[Ci ::t~ Laboratories LLC
v
Client: D N M '.c
Received By: ? W J../rL<J-
Suspected Hazard Information
CDc/Samples marked as radioactive?
Classified Radioactive nor m by RSD?
CDc/Samples marked containing PCBs?
Package, CDC, andlor Samples marked as
beryllium or asbestos containing?
Shipped as a DOT Hazardous?
Samples identified as Foreign Soil?
Sample Receipt
1 Shipping containers received intact
and sealed?
2 Samples requiring cold preservation
within (0 S 6 deg. C)'l*
2a Daily check perfonned and passed on
IRA ~n?
3 Chain of custody documents included
with shipment?
4 Sample containers intact and sealed?
5 Samples requiring chemical
P!~~"J vactuu at proper pH?
6 VOA vials free of heads pace (defined
as < 6mm bubble)?
7 IAre Encore containers present?
8 Samples received within holding
time?
9 Sample ID's on cac match ID's on
bottles?
10 Date & time on cac match date &
ltime on bottles?
Number of containers received match
Ll number indicated on CaC?
: 2 Are sample contain.ers identifiable as
. GEL provided?
cac fonn is properly signed in
3 relinqui~hedlreceived sections?
4 Carrier and tracking number.
mments (Use Continuation Form if needed):
SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
SDG/ARlCOClWorlf-Order: -~7!J ~ DU
Date Received: IV ().hJ. I C:., cfI () /6l
~ ZCl *IfNet Counts> JOOcpm on samples not marked "radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further
r' investigation,
xl
x
X·
'i Maximum Net Counts Observed'" (Observed Counts -Area Background Counts):
X If yes, Were swipes taken of sample contatiners < action levels?
,
X If yes, samples are to be segregeated as Safety Controlled Samples, and opened by the GEL Safety Group,
..P' Hazard Class Shipped: UN#:
x
Circle
Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container n0ther (describe)
15t!..,
Preservation Method: Ice bags Blue ice Dry ice .~ Other (describe)
*a11 temperatures are recorded in Celsius
• Device Serial #:
.~ Temperature Device Serial it (If Applicable): 61 5C21f(P '-I ~
Circle
Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Sample lO's, containers affected and observed pH:
I (If yes, immediately deliver to Volatiles laboratory)
iID's an~ tests affected:
ISample lO's and containers affected:
ISample 10'5 affected:
Sample ID's affected:
Circle Applicable:
FedEx Air PedEx Ground UPS Field Services Courier Other .....-
PM (or PMA) review: Initials -L.P .... ilu,, ______ Date U .. \; -l2. Page...\..-of-1-
f'ag~; f of 2. GE.I,.. Laboratories, LLC
Project #: GEL Chain of Custody and Analytical Request 2040 Savage Road
GEL Quote#: Charleston. SC 29407
COC Number (1): GEL Work Order Number: 31 59~'7-Phone: [phone]
PO Number: Fax: [phone]
Client Name: tne.f_~ -r-...ke..\ ~ Phone #: i ~ b. 7g -"121, Sampl~ Analysis Requested (5) (Fill in the number of containers for each test)
Project/Site Name: S .e.rY\~iAnnV\£}..\ &rO\Af\c\w£>..··h:r
.., r4 ~ ;2..C\'~ ... Fax#: Should this r.. CI,I '"Z. <--Preservative Type (6) c: "< sample be .;
Address: bL12S ~ W\N~ 1'fl 1::,' C\ (lj I ~ q' c,\f gLlSiJ considered: C ~ Q 0 ~~ (J .... Comments
Collected by: -r;.,'1 n e)'-~Dl,~J~ Send Results To: &Q.cr~ 1\ 'P",1(Y1(.r Q "1" -a.O r.. 1! Q,I L. f-?.n Note: extra sample 1S 7i .Q C'~ "Time :; 5 'J'f.l... required for sample "Date ColI.:cted ~ = ..n Sample ID Callccled QCCode Field Sample " c ~ e& specific QC (Military) m Filtered III Matrix ,4, -( ';
• For composites -indicate start and stop date/lime (mm-dd-yy) U Q ~ ~ (bhmm) II) ::t !-o f-oo
I"\W· OL 11.27 2Cil::l 11!.:21/J':t C~S6 .N '-.J &\.V '1.. )( 1-\
]t\\i(,-o2JI272Dl2. )l/"-:/112 085S Ai V 6vJ 2. " ~ l
M W-03_1l::2Z2D\2 n/:2$/;2. 1325 AJ Y &W 2. Y-'A' i
JIIVJ-03A. ."\1242D12 Jl(z1Ir::.. D7E.(;, ~ 'Y &W 2 "X \f..
fVr\i;-OS-11272Di2 \l/~7/1~ )S~ tJ Y &w 2 ). I'i.
J1W-j2-)t21.JC12 11/2.7/]2. 'lYO /./ V (;-w 2 " 'f.. I
MW-ILlll~7201'J... \1/:27/12.. 133S ;J y. &~ ..., 'f.. '1. --'-
fv1vv-17_i 12E:1o 12.. 1l/;z.~12 lOllS IJ Y &w :2 ). ~
NvJ-)~J l2.b1.0 12 \1/2.'-1 )2-}35D ;J V &w 1 ~ 'j. \
l'1\tV-z:t-) )2.b~20 i2. 11/2'/1'2.. }:306 /J Y bW f "t X
TAT Requested: Nonnal: I Rush: Specify: (Subject to Surcharge) lFax Results: Yes I ~ Circle Deliverable: C of A I QC Summary I Level 1 I Level2 I Level 3 I Level 4
Remarks: Are there any known hazards applicable to these samples? If so, please list the hazards Samnl!l; ~gllectig!l TilDe ZO!l~
Jt\W-lg N\~ fvt~J J2-},.;).\.iC-y><~",iDv..(,.. L,..b Bo+H~~, Eastern Pacific
Central Other ---v Mountain"'\
Chain of Custody Signatures Sample Shipping and Delivery Details
. Relinquished By (Signed) Date Time I$;};; Date Time GEL PM:
ILJ,~NI~ ,J)~tL 11/2-'1/:20\2-HDC II-3D-If} ZJf,~1 c , . ;::; Method of Shipment: Date Shipped:
"'--I
2 2 Airbill#:
3 3 Airbill#:
I.) Chain of Custody Number" Client Detennined For Lab Receiving Use Only
2.) QC Codes: N" Nonnll Sample. TB .. Trip Blank. FD -Field Duplicate, EB'" Equipment Blank. MS" Matrix Spike Sample. MSD '" Matrix Spike Duplicate Sample. G -Grab, C"" Composite
3.) Field Filtered: For liquid matrices. indicate with a • \' • for yes the sample was field filtered or· N -for sample was not field filtered. Custody Seal Jntact?
4.} Matrix Codes: DW-Drinking Willer. CW-Oroundw8ter. SW=Surface Water. WW"Waste Water. W"Waler. SO=SoH. SD=Sedimenl, SL"Sludge. S5='Solid Waste. O=Oil. F=Filter, P=Wlpc. VstJrine, F .. Fec:al. N"'Nasal YES NO
S.) Sample Analysis R.equested: Analytical method requested (i.e. 82608. 60 1 OSn470A ) and number of containers provided for each (i.e. 826()B ·3. 6010Bl747nA • I). Cooler Temp:
6.) Preservative Type: HA • Hydrochloric Acid. NI ... Nitric Acid. SH .. Sodium Hydroxide, SA -Sulfuric Acid: AA .. Ascorbic Acid. HX ~ Hexane. ST" Sodium Thiosulfate. If no preservative is added -leave field blank .~ C
WHITE = LABORATORY YELLOW = FILE PINK = CLIENT
'Pa5<>: 2::.. of" -? GEl.-Laboratories, LLC
Project #: GEL Chain of Custody and Analytical Request 2040 Savage Road
GEL Quote #: Charleston. SC 29407
COC Number (I): GEL Work Order Number: 3/5'7g~ Phone: [phone]
PO Number: Fax: (843) 766·1178
Client Name: /. Phone#: '\ Sample Analysis Requested (S} (Fill in the number of containers for each test) <l',
Project/Site Name: ~ D'W\~ C\.~ }/C\C\ -tbx #:
." \-' \4 Should this s.. '" 'Z. "< <-Preservative Type (6) I:
~ lI' '-.) sample be ! Address: considered: r:: g, ~ ~ u O. .... \/! ~ Comments Collected by: Send Results To: ~
~ s.. r... Note: extra sample is '" ~ -= -a Vi '" e ~ ·Time "; required for sample "Date Colh:cted DO = 'J'! ~~ Sample ID Collected QC Code Field Sample Ii! I: 6 specific QC (Military) m Filtered CJ) Matrix") < '3 ~ (mm-dd-yy) U • For composites -indicate start and stop dale/lime (hhmm) ~ ~ "<:
Jv\w -.24_ H2'L20\'J H/;JPt/ I '! obBS .N Y bW ,., I< )< -
M \;\) -bS J l.2720 t"2-1 \/;;"7/ I '2. D85'S N '-( &W ......, f. -,.. ""-
,"lw-70_ )j 2&26)2 il/WJ2... \D'-l~ .,J V &w ?.. X X· I
..... ~ X Y.
TAT Requested: Normal: / Rush: Specify: (Subject to Surcharge) IFax Results: Yes I fN~ Circle Deliverable: C of A I QC Summary I Level 1 I Level 2 J Level 3 I Levcl4
Re1lUlrks: Are there any known hazards applicable /0 these samples? If so, please list the hazards -.-s~12Is;: ~!.'!IIs;:~iQ1l Iim~ ZQD~
Eastern Pacific
Central Other ---I ~untaiiD i
Chain of Custody Signatures Sample Shipping and Delivery Details
. Relinquished By (Signed) Date Time 1ed ~ (.igned) Date Tim.
.JlJdL 11/:;!-q/~t2-liDO
GEL PM:
h -.)nt1.11fj"f( 1 (IJ!~ //-g~--Id 09,'15 Method ofShi"ment: Date Shipped:
2
::J .
2 Airbill#:
3 3 Airbill#:
I.) Chain of Cuttody Number'"' Client Determined For Lab Receiving Use Only 2.) QC Codes: N .. NOmI.1 Sample. Til .. Trip Blank. '0" Fiold Dupll~ale. EB'" Equipmenl Blank. MS" Matrix Spike Sample. MSD .. Matrix Spike Duplicate Sample. G ~ Qrab. C .. Composite
3.) Field Filtered: For liquid mittie", indicate with a • Y • tor ycs the ~ample was field filtered or • N • for sample was not field filtered. Custody Seal Intact?
4.) Ml1rilC Coda: DW"Orlnlting Water, GW-Oroundwiller. SW-Surfacc Water. WW .. Wastc Waler. W"Water. SO-Soil. SD"Sedimenl. SL-Sludge, SS-Solid Waste, O'-Oil. F-Filtcr. P-Wipe. U-Urine, Fufccal. N"Nasal YES NO
5.) Sample Anillysia Requested: Analytical method roquc51cd (i.e. 8Z60B. 6010Bn410A) and number of contlliners provided f~r each (i.e. 8260B ·3. 6010SI7470A • I). Coot Tem~:
6.} Preservative T)'l)C: HA. Hyd~hloric MId. NI" Nitric Acid. SH'" Sodium HydrolClde. SA" Sulfuric: Acid: AA" Ascorbic Acid. HX· Hexane. ST· Sodiwn Thiosulfate. (fno preservative is added -leave field blank
WHITE za LABORATORY YELLOW = FILE PINK 111: CLIENT
m:3!Il Laboratories LLC SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
,--.. ~
Client: ~.) \'J tv\ L SDG/ARlCOCfW9(k Order: 31 .S9 8+ "I.
Received By: ~.W~ Date Received: ~ &A) , 'S o. ~ D t Q)
Suspected Hazard Information ~ ~ *If Net Counts> 100cpm on samples not marked "radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further
investigation.
C~c/Samples marked as radioactive? 'Y. Maximum Net Counts Observed* (Observed Counts· Area Background Counts): Ii (lJ f'.AAL
Classified Radioactive IT or m by RSO? ~ If yes, Were swipes taken of sample contatiners < action levels?
C~c/Samples marked containing PCBs? )('
Package, COC. and/or Samples marked as X beryllium or asbestos containing? If yes, sam~les are to be segregeated as Safety Controlled Samples, and opened by the GEL Safety Group.
Shipped as a DOT Hazardous? X Hazard Class Shipped: UN#:
Samples identified as Foreign Soil? )(
Sample Receipt ~ ~ ~ 1'0. , .... • forf\lnn..... .. Items) -.
Shipping containers received intact Circle Applicable:
1 and sealed? X Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Samples requiring cold preservation Preservation Method: Ice bags Blue ice Dry ice None Other (describe)
2
within (0 < 6 deg. C)?* X "'all temperatures are recorded in Celsius
Daily check perfonned and passed on Device Serial #:
2a ~ Temperature Device Serial # (If Applicable): IDR A gun? )(
3 Chain of custody documents included
with shipment?
Circle Applicable:
4 Sample containers intact and sealed? )( Seals broken Damaged container ' Leaking container Other (describe)
'" I requiring chemical Sample 1O's, containers affected and observed pH:
5 A
X 11'L"'~"'A UlUVU at proper pH? It I added. T I'll#~
VOA vials free of headspace (defined Sample ~'s and containers affected:
6 as < 6mm bubble)?
(If yes, immediately deliver to Volatiles laboratory)
7 IAre Encore containers present? X
Samples received within holding ID's and tests affected:
8 time? X
Sample ID's on cae match ID's on Sample ID's and containers affected:
9 bottles? X
Date & time on COC match date & Sample ID's affected:
10 time on bottles? K
I "\umber of containers received match ISample ID's affected:
11 number indicated on COC? X
12 Are sample contain_ers identifiable as
GEL provided? X
l3 Icoe fonn is properly signed in
X _. • It _.:! sections? .
Circle Applicable:
PedEx Air PedEx Ground UPS Field Services Courier Other
X c. " 5' 3 Of} 3893 )Sc-!3()/5
4 Carrier and tracking number.
8lJI5 5 30D? 34;;;;6
)mments (Use Continuation Form if needed):
/I , -_,/""""0. . -'
PM (or PMA) review: Initials ru Date \~JDI d-pagelofL v .
-~-.-----i i Page: of GEL Laboratories, LLC
Project #: GEL Chain of Custody and Analytical Request 2040 Savage Road
GEL Quote #:
Icoe Number (I):
Charleston, SC 29407
PO Number: GEL Work Order Number: 3i~515 Phone: [phone]]71
Fax: [phone]
Client Name: ~f\ e.'~'\ "f.\AJ~ Phone #: Lr:)S ?:.7g 2'7') J Sample Analysis Requested (5) (Fill in the number of containers for each test)
Project/Site Name:.· \ G ~:t Fax#: ... t.l. Should this -\-I 5e.Y"'I'cJ,.r1llVl~ -rc\A(\O we.. e.r LC 12.. ~ ~ <-Preservative Type (6) I = '"2 sample be -.;
Address: (;Ll 'IS S l-tv-\y 191 Blf.iJ1j;"4 L,\T gY5J1 considered: c: '3. = u -a ......., ~ .... vi j:? Comments Collected by: ---G () .... +)~Il;J~-1 Send Results To: G-6..rr;,... P,\} lI1er = ~ I. ~ ~el Q,I ~ Jt. .. ..} Note: extra sample is .c
-Time .. "; e .Jt '-C . .;; required for sample -Oate Collected > I>Il :::I .,1\
Sample ID Collccled QC Code Field Sample ~ ~ = -a .is I.. specific QC (Military) C'l Filtered (J) Matrix H) « :; ~ ~ri. • For composites -indicate start and SlOp date/time (mm-dd-yy) :; (J (hhmm) Q! en = -s: '"" !-
MvJ-1.:3> .. }:l.O~:l..O i?.. i2/05!2c)j'l 1'100 IV Y &w ,.J " X )< ......
A~ -37_ 1::t05::lD' '.l. \'l/o E/~\'2. \~io tV y &W N ?-'X )<
TATR~uested: Nonnal: i.' Rush: Specify: (Subject to Surcharge) lFax Results: Yes I ~ Circle Deliverable: C of A I QC Summary J Level 1 I Level 2 J Level 3 I Leve14
Remarks: Are there any known hazards applicable to these samples? If so, please list the hazards S~Qle CQllectiog Time ZQne
Eastern Pacific
C~I Other ---I--Mounta'f9>
Chain of Custody Signatures . Sample Shipping and Delivery Details
. Relinquished By (Signed) Date Time Received by (signed) Date Time
1 .:)cJlvN/~ Hu!J)~~ I ~ ~JtRAd-I ::1-\1-1 a
GEL PM:
12/ ~ 1:L~J'2. 11 DO O~It,; Method of Shipment: Date Shipped:
'-..'
2 2 Airbill #:
3 3 Airbill #:
I.) Chain of Custody Number" Client Determined For Lab Receiving Use Only
2.) QC Codes: N" Normlll Sample. TB = Trip Blank, FD = Field Duplicate, EB = Equipment Blank. MS = Matrix Spike Sample. MSD .. Matrix Spike Duplicate Sample. G '" Grab, C = Composite
3.) Field Fihered: For liquid matrices. indicate with a • Y -for yes the sample was field filtered or -N -for sample was nol field filIC~d. Custody Sea/Intact?
4.) Matrix Codes: DW=Drinking Wllter, GW=Groundw8ter. SW:zSurface Wllter. WW=Waste Water. W",Water. SO=Soil. SD=Sedimenl. SL=Sludge. SS-Solid Waste. O=Oil. F=Filler. P=Wipe. U-Urine,· F=Fecal. N=Nasal YES NO
s.) Sample Analysis Requested: Analytical method requested (i.e. 8260B. 6010Bn470A) and number of containers provided for each (i.e. 81608 ·3, 6010B!7470A • J). Coo,e5emp:
6.) Preservative Type: HA = Hydrochloric Acid. NI '" Nitric Acid. SH = Sodium Hydroxide. SA '" Sulfuric Acid: AA '" Ascorbic Acid. HX = Hexane, ST = Sodium Thiosulfate. If no preservative is added'" leave field blank q·C
WHITE = LABORATORY YELLOW = FILE PINK = CLIENT
\ ~ .. \ ,--12...
_flboratories LLC -...... -Client: .1 ) A...L .A A ~ c..l..J. WMI. -~,.,.,
Received By: V .. ~ ~ t-
Suspected Hazard Information ~
COC/Samples marked as radioactive?
Classified Radioactive n or m by RSO?
COC/Samples marked containing PCBs?
Package, COC, andlor Samples marked as
beryllium or asbestos containing?
Shipped as a DOT Hazardous?
Samples identified as Foreign Soil?
Sample Receipt ~
Shipping containers received intact I and sealed? ~
Samples requiring cold preservation 2 within (0 ~ 6 deg. C)?* X
Daily check performed and passed on 2a lR temperature gun? X
3 Chain of custody documents included X with shipment?
4 Sample containers intact and sealed? Ix ,
IIAfUIIIll~ chemical 5 k' .. " ~ .. ~ ............. at proper pH?
VOA vials free of head sp ace (defined 6 as < 6mm bubble)?
7 Are Encore containers present?
Samples received within holding 8 I time? X
Sample ID's on coe match lO's on 9 bottles? ,X
Date & time on cac match date & 10 time on bottles?
Number of containers received match 11 number indicated on COC?
12 Are sample containers identifiable as
GEL provided?
13 cae form is properly signed in
• • v": sections?
~
14 Carrier and tracking number.
~nmment~ (Use Continuation Form if needed):
~
>< X·
K
)(
l(
X
~
SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
SDG/ARICOC/Work Q.rder: 6l{/)SI.S
Date Received: ~~ )l1L~ . 1 (, t9.o I a
*IfNet Counts> IOOcpm on samples not marked "radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further
investigation. ...... -Maximum Net Counts Observed* (Observed Counts -Area Background Counts): o ~)t"'wM
If yes, Were swipes taken of sample contatiners < action levels?
rfyes, samples are to be segregeated as Safety Controlled Samples, and opened by the GEL Safety Group.
Hazard Class Shipped: UN#:
~ ~ 'Nnn . Items) .
Circle A .I!. .1.
Seals broken Damal:f, cSainer Leaking oontainer Other (describe)
Preservation Method: Ice bags . Blue ice Dry ice None Other (describe)
*all temperatures are recorded in Celsius
T Device Serial #:
...... w"' .... J Temperature Device Serial # (If Applicable): ~ ( S 1) 'f(;, if ~
Circle Applicable:
Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Sample lO's, containers affected and observed pH:
Rr1c1"tf Lot#:
Sample lO's and containers affected:
(1fyes, immediately deliver to Volatiles laboratory)
X
lID's and tests affected:
Sample lOts ~n" r.nntRinp.~ affected:
I Sample lO's affected:
ISample lO's affected:
Circle ." .L'
FedEx Air FedEx Ground UPS Field Services Courier Other .... -~ 3fOB,5c. go/" 62 r;a
6/)15 580;; 3L{O'j.,l{c
\ \. -I
PM (or PMA) review: Initials ~. Date \),\:>\j-Page~ ·i .. ..
Samples Were: COC Tape Was:
I3"'Sh!Qped By: ~J -X' Present on Outer Package
o Hand Delivered I 0'Yes DNo DN/A
o Ambient Unbroken on Outer package
lP<hilled if Yes DNo DN/A
Temperature 2·1 DC Present on Sample
Rec. Broken/Leaking DYes @1\fo DN/A . DYes DNo erN/A
Notes:
Properly Preserved
Notes:
Rec. Within Hold
Notes:
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD ·
Cyanide
Metals
NOz &N03
Nutrients .
0&0
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN ·
TOC
TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Unbroken on Sample
DYes
~s DNo DN/A Notes:
~s DNo
--
Preservative . All pHs OK I 1-
pH <2 H2SO4
. pH <2 H2SO4
PH>12NaOH
pH<2HN03 YC'f t/C}
. pH<2 H2SO4
/
pH <2 H2S04
pH <2HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH:> 9NaOH, ZnAC
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H3P04
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 HCL
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide rcmge pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
DNo j?'N/A
3 t./ . r
Jf, *-.r M , /
. ~
: ...
Lab Set ID: 1<3 0 I t../1-.I
Container Type:
b..(\ W AL Supplied Plastic
D AWAL Supplied Clear Glass
o A WAh...Supplied Amber Glass
o A W AL s",~d VOArrOCrrOX Vials
D Amber DC r D Head~ace DNo Headspace
D Non A WALSupplied Container
Notes: \U-lj
J
Discrepancies Between Labefs ~nd COC
Notes:
G 7
yey )k-f
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag eoe and notify client for further·instructions
Place client conversation on coe
Samples may be adjusted at client request
No. Rec.
:
DYes ld"No
...
I
I
I
I
I
[€13M Laboratories LLC
a member of The GEL Group INC PO Box 30712 Charleston, SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407
P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178
January 29,2013
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: White Mesa Mill GW
Work Order: 314781
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on November 08,2012. This revised data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4505. ~~
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Heather Shaffer
Project Manager
IlIn lll .1 111 111111 1IIIIII I1
www.gel.com
January 29, 2013
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 314781
Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on November 08,
2012 for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All
sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments
concerning sample receipt.
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following samples:
Case Narrative:
Laboratory ID
314781001
314781002
Client ID
MW-31 11062012
MW-32 11062012
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler
Receipt Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: Metals and
Radiochemistry .
Heather Shaffer
Proj ect Manager
Sheet 1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: GEL Laboratories Contact: ------------------------Garrin Palmer or David Turk
Ph: 435678 2221
Project
Semiannual
Groundwater 2012
Sample 10
MW-31 11062012
MW -32 11062012
2040 Savage Rd
Charleston, South Carol ina 29407 [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
Samplers Name Samplers Signature
j r
Tanner Holliday
Date Time
Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
11/6/2012 1345 Metals per S.O.W, Gross Alpha per S.O.W
11/6/2012 1330 Metals per S.O.W, Gross Alpha per S.O.W
...
Please notify Garrin Palmer or Tanner Holliday of Reciept tempature on these samples Immediately!
Thank you.
Relinquished By:(Signature)
Relinquished By:(Signature)
g I Laboratories LLC SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
Client: DWMl SDG/ ARICOCIWQ* Order: (~j(·r78J
Received By: ~-hTC\i/hr Date Received: ~/[)61'? " ' f.""' ~ ~ *IfNet Counts> lOOcpm on samples not marked "radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further Suspected Hazard Information I!n vestigation. ..... -,....... A
COC/Samples marked as radioactive? / Itrtaximum Net Counts Observed* (Observed Counts -Area Background Counts): ( 1/ VJ "
Classified Radioactive II or III by RSO? / If yes, Were swipes taken of sample contatiners < action levels? ,
COC/Samples marked containing PCBs? /
Package, COC, and/or Samples marked as / V
beryllium or asbestos containing? !f yes, samples are to be segregeated as Safety Controlled Samples, and opened by the GEL Safety Group.
Shipped as a DOT Hazardous? ,/ Hazard Class Shipped: UN#:
Samples identified as Foreign Soil? /
Sample Receipt Criteria ~ ~ <:) r. (Required for Non-Conforming Items) Z ""
Shipping containers received intact , Circle Applicable:
1 and sealed? ) / Seals broken Da~ainer Leaking container Other (describe)
i' '0'0"''''5''''''''': ~:d ~ Blue ice Dry ice None Other (describe) Samples requiring cold preservation /' 2 within (0 < 6 deg. C)?* / are recorded in Celsius
2a Daily check performed and passed on ,/ / Temperature Device Serial #: ~~lP
IR temperature gun? Secondary Temperature Device ~if -.-,'
3 Chain of custody documents included
with shipment?
Circle Applicable:
4 Sample containers intact and sealed? Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Samples requiring chemical / Sample lO's, containers affected and observed pH:
5 preservation at proper pH? If~ llililp.iI.TN#·
VOA vials free of heads pace (defined I/~ Sample lO's and containers affected:
6 as < 6mm bubble)?
~If yes, immediately deliver to Volatiles laboratory)
7 Are Encore containers present?
ITn'~ n~rI 'a~'~ .ce. recelvea WlUun hOlding 8 .
n .... ...
Sample lD's on cac match lO's on Sample lO's and containers affected:
9 I bottles?
Date & time on COC match date & Sample lO's affected:
10 time on bottles?
Number of containers received match Sample lO's affected:
11 number indicated on CaC? J
Are sample containers identifiabl,e as / V
12 GEL provided?
13 COC form is properly signed in
relinquished/recei ved sections?
Circle Applicable:
FedEx Air FedEx Ground UPS Field Services Courier Other
14 Carrier and tracking number. UQS \1-\~l ~L1y Q\ ~0\5 \\ L5 ,-5
(Use Continuation Form if needed):
i 1L-1 " . r-
PM (or PMA) review: Initials r\~ Date 1'1 TFll V Page -L of_l_
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 314781
Page 1 of 3
GEL Work Order/SOG: 314781
Client SDG: 314781
Semi-annual
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
Heather Shaffer
DNMI00100 White Mesa Mill GW
DW16138
LEVEL3
EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
314781001 MVV-31_11062012
314781002 MVV-32_11062012
Client Sample ID Status Tests/Methods
-001 MW-31_11062012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL
-002 MVV-32_11062012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL
Work Order Due Date: 29-NOV-12 Collector: C
Package Due Date:
EDD Due Date:
Due Date:
27-NOV-12
29-NOV-12
29-NOV-12
Prelogin #: 20121197572
Project Workdef ID: 1294356
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by: HXS 1
GL Review Fractions: Rad
Collect
Date & Time
Receive Time # of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
06-NOV-1213:45 08-NOV-12 11 :05 0
06-NOV-1213:30 08-NOV-12 11 :05 0
Product
Reference Fax Date PM Comments
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
use product group
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
use product group
Lab
Matrix
Fax Days to
Due Date Process
GROUND VVATER
GROUND VVATER
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
21
21
Aux Data
y
5
y
5
CofC#
Prelog Lab Field
Group QC QC
Receive
Codes
Product: MER245_L Workdef ID: 1308786 In Product Group? Yes Group Name: PROD _ GROUP02 Group Reference: Full metals suite
Path: Standard Method: EPA 245.1/245.2
Product Description: EPA 245 Mercury
Samples: 001, 002
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7439-97-6 Mercury
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
.5
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Product Reference: use product group
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 314781
Page 2 of 3
Product: ICPTAL20L WorkdeflD: 1308787 In Product Group? Yes Group Name: PROD _ GROUP02 Group Reference: Full metals suite
Method: EPA 200.7 Path: Standard
Product Description: 200.7/200.2 TAL Product Reference: use product group
Samples: 001, 002 Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client RDl or Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
CAS # Parmname PQl & Unit Units Function in Sample? in QC? list?
7440-70-2 Calcium 500 ug/L REG Y Y Yes
7440-47-3 Chromium 25 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-48-4 Cobalt 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-89-6 Iron 30 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-95-4 Magnesium 500 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-96-5 Manganese 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-98-7 Molybdenum 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-02-0 Nickel 20 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-09-7 Potassium 500 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-23-5 Sodium 500 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-31-5 Tin 100 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-62-2 Vanadium 15 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-66-6 Zinc 10 ug/L REG Y Y
Product: MIMTAL20_L WorkdeflD: 1308788 In Product Group? Yes Group Name: PROD_GROUP02 Group Reference: Full metals suite
Method: EPA 200.8 Path: Standard
Product Description: 200.8/200.2 TAL Product Reference: use product group
Samples: 001, 002 Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client RDl or Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
CAS # Parmname PQl & Unit Units Function in Sample? inQC? list?
7440-38-2 Arsenic 5 ug/L REG Y Y Yes
7440-41-7 Beryllium .5 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-43-9 Cadmium .5 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-50-8 Copper 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-92-1 Lead ug/L REG Y Y
7782-49-2 Selenium 5 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-22-4 Silver 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-28-0 Thallium .5 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-61-1 Uranium .3 ug/L REG Y Y
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Product: GFCTORAL Workdef ID: 1297250
Method: EPA 900.1 Modified
Product Description: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Samples: 001 ,002
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
Gross Radium Alpha
In Product Group? No
Action Product Name Description
Contingent
Tests
Login Requirements:
Requirement
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
Samples
Reporting
Units
pCi/L
Include? Comments
Peer Review by: ____________ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 314781
Page 3 of 3
Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
Sample Analysis
Sample ID
314781001
314781002
1202776372
1202788274
1202776373
1202788275
1202776376
1202776374
1202776375
1202776377
1202776378
1202776381
1202776379
1202776380
1202784130
1202784131
1202784134
1202784132
1202784133
Metals Fractional Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SnG 314781
Client ID
MW-31 11062012
MW-32 11062012
Method Blank (MB) ICP
Method Blank (MB) ICP
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
314781001(MW-31_11062012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
314781001(MW-31_11062012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
314781001(MW-31_11062012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
Method Blank (MB) ICP-MS
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
314781002(MW-32_11062012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
314781002(MW-32_11062012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
314781002(MW-32_11062012S}Matrix Spike (MS)
Method Blank (MB) CV AA
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
314781001(MW-31_11062012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
314781001(MW-31_11062012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
314781001(MW-31_11062012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Method/Analysis Information
Analytical Batch:
Prep Batch:
Standard Operating
Procedures:
1261742, 1266787, 1261744 and 1265083
1261741, 1266786, 1261743 and 1265082
GL-MA-E-013 REV# 21, GL-MA-E-016 REV# 9, GL-MA-E-014
REV# 24 and GL-MA-E-OI0 REV# 25
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
EPA 200.7, EPA 200.8 and EPA 245.11245.2
EPA 200.2 and EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
The SOP stated above has been prepared based on technical research and testing conducted by
GEL Laboratories, LLC. and with guidance from the regulatory documents listed in this
"Methodl Analysis Information" section.
System Configuration
The Metals analysis-ICP was performed on aPE 4300 Optima radial/axial-viewing inductively
coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer. The instrument is equipped with a Burgener
nebulizer, cyclonic spray chamber, and yttrium or scandium internal standard. Operating
conditions for the ICP are set at a power level of 1500 watts. The instrument has a peristaltic
pump flow rate of 1.4L/min, argon gas flows of 15 L/min and 0.2 L/min for the torch and
auxiliary gases, and a flow setting of 0.65L/min for the nebulizer.
The Metals analysis-ICP was performed on a PE 7300 Optima radial/axial-viewing inductively
coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer. The instrument is equipped with a Burgener
nebulizer, cyclonic spray chamber, and yttrium or scandium internal standard. Operating
conditions for the ICP are set at a power level of 1500 watts. The instrument has a peristaltic
pump flow rate of 1.4L/min, argon gas flows of 15 L/min and 0.2 L/min for the torch and
auxiliary gases, and a flow setting of 0.65L/min for the nebulizer.
The Metals analysis -ICPMS was performed on a Perkin Elmer ELAN 9000 inductively coupled
plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The instrument is equipped with a cross-flow nebulizer,
quadrupole mass spectrometer, and dual mode electron multiplier detector. Internal standards of
scandium, germanium, indium, tantalum, and/or lutetium were utilized to cover the mass
spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W power and combined argon pressures of 360+1-
7 kPa for the plasma and auxiliary gases, and 0.85 L/min carrier gas flow, and an initial lens
voltage of 5.2.
The Metals analysis-Mercury was performed on a Perkin-Elmer Flow Injection Mercury System
(FIMS-I00) automated mercury analyzer. The instrument consists of a cold vapor atomic
absorption spectrometer set to detect mercury at a wavelength of253.7 nm. Sample introduction
through the flow injection system is performed via a peristaltic pump at 9 mL/min and nitrogen
carrier gas rate of 80 mL/min.
Calibration Information
Instrument Calibration
All initial calibration requirements have been met for this sample· delivery group (SDG).
CRDL Requirements
All CRDL standard(s) met the referenced advisory control limits.
ICSA/ICSAB Statement
All interference check samples (ICSA and ICSAB) associated with this SDG met the established
acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Blank (CCB) Requirements
All continuing calibration blanks (CCB) bracketing this batch met the established acceptance
criteria.
Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) Requirements
All continuing calibration verifications (CCV) bracketing this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Quality Control (QC) Information
Method Blank (MB) Statement
The MBs analyzed with this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Recovery
The LCS spike recoveries met the acceptance limits.
Quality Control (QC) Sample Statement
The following samples were selected as the quality control (QC) samples for this SDG:
314781001 (MW-31_11062012)-ICP and CVAA and 314781002 (MW-32_11062012)-ICP-MS.
Matrix Spike (MS) Recovery Statement _
The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the MS analyses are evaluated when the sample
concentration is less than four times (4X) the spike concentration added. All applicable elements
met the acceptance criteria.
Duplicate Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The RPD obtained from the designated sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated based on acceptance
criteria of20% when the sample is >5X the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases
where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control of +1 -RL is used to
evaluate the DUP results. All applicable analytes met these requirements.
Serial Dilution % Difference Statement
The serial dilution is used to assess matrix suppression or enhancement. Raw element
concentrations that are 25X the IDL/MDL for CVAA, 50X the IDL/MDL for ICP, and 100X the
IDL/MDL for ICP-MS analyses are applicable for serial dilution assessment. All applicable
analytes met the acceptance criteria of less than 10% difference (%D).
Technical Information
Holding Time Specifications
GEL assigns holding times based on the associated methodology, which assigns the date and
time from sample collection of sample receipt. Those holding times expressed in hours are
calculated in the AlphaLIMS system. Those holding times expressed as days expire at midnight
on the day of expiration. All samples in this SDG met the specified holding time.
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
All procedures were performed as stated in the SOP.
Sample Dilutions
Dilutions are performed to minimize matrix interferences resulting from elevated mineral
element concentrations present in solid samples and/or to bring over range target analyte
concentrations into the linear calibration range of the instruments. Dilutions were required for
this SDG in order to minimize copper and/or tin suppression due to matrix interferences.
Preparation Information
The samples in this SDG were prepared exactly according to the cited SOP.
Miscellaneous Information
Electronic Packaging Comment
This data package was generated using an electronic data processing program referred to as
virtual packaging. In an effort to increase quality and efficiency, the laboratory has developed
systems to generate all data packages electronically. The following change from traditional
packages should be noted:
Analyst/peer reviewer initials and dates are not present on the electronic data files. Presently, all
initials and dates are present on the original raw data. These hard copies are temporarily stored in
the laboratory. An electronic signature page inserted after the case narrative will include the data
validator's signature and title. The signature page also includes the data qualifiers used in the
fractional package. Data that are not generated electronically, such as hand written pages, will be
scanned and inserted into the electronic package.
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports (DERs) are generated to document procedural anomalies that may deviate
from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not
generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this SDG.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has
met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case
narrative.
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data
designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion
of the data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
Reviewer:
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis Report
for
DNMIOO 1 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 314781 GEL Work Order: 314781
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
U Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
The designation ND, ifpresent, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above
the limit as defined in the 'U' qualifier above.
This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC
standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Heather Shaffer.
Reviewed by
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW -31 11062012
Lab Sample ID: 314781001
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.1 /245.2 Prep EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
AXS5
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 5,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
ClIent SUO: 314 781 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
11120112 1541 1265082
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
larameter
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-32 11062012
Lab Sample ID: 314781002
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
Qualifier Result
EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
Report Date: February 5, 2013
Proiect: DNMI00100
Client ID: DNMIOOl
ClIent SUG: 314781 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
AXS5 11/20/12 1541 1265082
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summarl: ReDort Date: February 5, 2013
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page 10f 5
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 314781
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD/D% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
\1etals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1261744
QC1202776379 314781002 OUP
Arsenic U 5.00 U 5.00 ug/L N/A RMJ 1112011205:3-
Beryllium U 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A 11/2111203:3'
Cadmium 0.509 0.565 ug/L 10.4 /\ (+1-0.500) 1112011205:3-
Lead U 1.00 U 1.00 ug/L N/A
Selenium U 5.00 U 5.00 ug/L N/A
Thallium U 0.500 U 0.500 ugIL N/A
Uranium 1.90 1.74 ug/L 8.91 (0%-20%) 1112111203:3'
QCI202776378 LCS
Arsenic 50.0 54.6 ug/L 109 (85%-115%) 1112011205:0
Beryllium 50.0 53.7 ug/L 107 (85%-115%) 1112111203:2
Cadmium 50.0 55.0 ug/L 110 (85%-115%) 1112011205:0
Lead 50.0 54.4 ug/L 109 (85%-115%)
Selenium 50.0 55.0 ug/L 110 (85%-115%)
Thallium 50.0 52.3 ug/L 105 (85%-115%)
Uranium 50.0 56.3 ug/L 113 (85%-115%) 1112111203:2
QC1202776377 MB
Arsenic U 5.00 ug/L 1112011204:5'
Beryllium U 0.500 ug/L 1112111203:2.
Cadmium U 0.500 ug/L 11/2011204:5'
Lead U 1.00 ug/L
Selenium U 5.00 ug/L
Thallium U 0.500 ug/L
Uranium U 0.300 ug/L 1112111203:2
QC1202776380 314781002 MS
Arsenic 50.0 U 5.00 53.5 ug/L 106 (75%-125%) 1112011205:4
Beryllium 50.0 U 0.500 56.2 ug/L 112 (75%-125%) 1112111203:4
Cadmium 50.0 0.509 49.6 ug/L 98.2 (75%-125%) 11120/1205:4
-beaG $Q.Q--lJ 1.00 48.0--ugLL 95.8_{-15%·--125%)
Selenium 50.0 U 5.00 59.0 ug/L 117 (75%-125%)
Thallium 50.0 U 0.500 46.8 ug/L 93 .3 (75%-125%)
Uranium 50.0 1.90 61.5 ug/L 119 (75%-125%) 1112111203:4
QC1202776381 314781002 SOILT
Arsenic U 8.50 U 8.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 1112011205:4'
Beryllium U 1.00 U 1.00 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 1112111203:4
Cadmium 0.509 0.122 ug/L 19.8 (0%-10%) 1112011205:4'
Lead U 2.50 U 2.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Selenium U 7.50 U 7.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Thallium U 2.25 U 2.25 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar:y
Workorder: 314781 Page 2 of 5
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
Vletals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1261744
Uranium 1.90 0.359 ug/L 5.48 (0%-10%) 1112111203:4
3atch 1272955
QC1202804820 314781001 DUP
Copper U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A SKJ 01104/13 16:3
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A 01107/13 17:5
QC 1202804824 315400001 DUP
Copper U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A 01 /04113 16:4
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A 0110311322:0-
QC 1202804819 LCS
Copper 50.0 53.6 ug/L 107 (85%-115%) 01104113 16:2
Silver 50.0 52.4 ug/L 105 (85%-115%) 0110311321:1
QC 1202804818 MB
Copper U 10.0 ug/L 01104/13 16:21
Silver U 10.0 ug/L 01 /03/13 21:1·
QC1202804821 314781001 MS
Copper 50.0 U 10.0 50.0 ug/L 94.1 (75%-125%) 01104113 16:3
Silver 50.0 U 10.0 55.7 ug/L 111 (75%-125%) 01 /07113 17:5
QC 1202804825 315400001 MS
Copper 50.0 U 10.0 49.5 ug/L 92 (75%-125%) 01104113 16:4'
Silver 50.0 U 10.0 47.3 ug/L 94.6 (75%-125%) 0110311322:0
QC1202804822 314781001 SDILT
Copper U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01104/13 16:3
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01107/13 17:5'
QC1202804834 315400001 SDILT
Copper U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01104/13 16:5
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01103/13 22:1
Vletals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1261742
QC1202776374 314781001 DUP
Calcium 182000 189000 ug/L 3.74 (0%-20%) LS 11128112 12:31
Chromium U 25.0 U 25.0 ug/L N/A
Cobalt U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A
Iron U 30.0 U 30.0 ug/L N/A
Magnesium 86500 89100 ug/L 2.97 (0%-20%)
Manganese U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A
Molybdenum U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A
Nickel U 20.0 U 20.0 ug/L N/A
Potassium 5650 5740 ug/L 1.56 (0%-20%)
Sodium 92600 96300 ug/L 3.84 (0%-20%)
Tin U 100 U 100 ug/L N/A 11/28112 15 :5
Vanadium U 15.0 U 15.0 ug/L N/A 11/28112 12:31
Zinc U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A
QC1202776373 LCS
Calcium 5000 5500 ug/L 110 (85%-115%) 11128112 12:2·
Chromium 500 523 ug/L 105 (85%-115%)
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar:y
Workorder: 314781 Page 3 of 5
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
\1etals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1261742
Cobalt 500 554 ug/L 111 (85%-115%)
Iron 5000 5540 ug/L 111 (85%-115%) LS 11128112 12:2·
Magnesium 5000 5710 ug/L 114 (85%-115%)
Manganese 500 525 ug/L 105 (85%-115%)
Molybdenum 500 518 ug/L 104 (85%-115%)
Nickel 500 529 ug/L 106 (85%-115%)
Potassium 5000 5430 ug/L 109 (85%-115%)
Sodium 5000 5600 ug/L 112 (85%-115%)
Tin 500 530 ug/L 106 (85%-115%)
Vanadium 500 531 ug/L 106 (85%-115%)
Zinc 500 526 ug/L 105 (85%-115%)
QCI202776372 MB
Calcium U 500 ug/L 11/28112 12:2
Chromium U 25.0 ug/L
Cobalt U 10.0 ug/L
Iron U 30.0 ug/L
Magnesium U 500 ug/L
Manganese U 10.0 ug/L
Molybdenum U 10.0 ug/L
Nickel U 20.0 ug/L
Potassium U 500 ug/L
Sodium U 500 ug/L
Tin U 100 ug/L
Vanadium U 15.0 ug/L
Zinc U 10.0 ug/L
QC1202776375 314781001 MS
Calcium 5000 182000 192000 ug/L N/A (75%-125%) 11128112 12:3
Chromium 500 U 25.0 500 ug/L 99.9 (75%-125%)
Cobalt 500 U 10.0 508 ug/L 102 (75%-125%)
Iron 5000 U 30.0 5190 ug/L 104 (75%-125%)
Magnesium 5000 86500 93800 ug/L N/A (75%-125%)
Manganese 500 U 10.0 497 ug/L 99.4 (75%-125%)
Molybdenum 500 U 10.0 527 ug/L 104 (75%-125%)
Nickel 500 U 20.0 495 ug/L 98.7 (75%-125%)
Potassium 5000 5650 11000 ug/L 107 (75%-125%)
Sodium 5000 92600 101000 ug/L N/A (75%-125%)
Tin 500 U 100 418 ug/L 83.6 (75%-125%) 11128112 15:5
Vanadium 500 U 15.0 534 ug/L 107 (75%-125%) 11128/12 12:3.
Zinc 500 U 10.0 507 ug/L 101 (75%-125%)
QC1202776376 314781001 SDILT
Calcium 182000 37000 ug/L 1.47 (0%-10%) 11128112 12:3.
Chromium U 25.0 U 25.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Cobalt U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 314781
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC%
\1etals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1261742
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Sodium
Tin
Vanadium
Zinc
\1etals Analysis-Mercury
3atch 1265083
QC1202784132 314781001
Mercury
QC 1202784131 LCS
Mercury
QC1202784130 MB
Mercury
QCI202784133 314781001
Mercury
QCI202784134 314781001
Mercury
Notes:
DUP
2.00
MS
2.00
SDILT
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
U
U
U
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
150 U 150 ug/L NIA
86500 17700 ug/L 2.43
10.0 U 10.0 ug/L NIA
10.0 U 10.0 ug/L NIA
20.0 U 20.0 ug/L NIA
5650 1030 ug/L 8.83
92600 18700 ug/L .951
125 U 125 ug/L N/A
15.0 U 15.0 ug/L N/A
16.5 U 16.5 ug/L N/A
0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A
2.11 ug/L
U 0.500 ug/L
0.500 2.06 ug/L
0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
Estimated Value
106
103
Page 4 of 5
Range Anlst Date Time
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%) LS 11128112 12:3
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%) 11128112 16:01
(0%-10%) 11128112 12:3
(0%-10%)
BYVI 1112111208:0
(85%-115%) 1112111208:0
1112111208:0
(75%-125%) 1112111208:11
(0%-10%) 1112111208:1
A
B
BD
C
D
E
F
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H
K
L
M
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC 'Summary
Workorder: 314781
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC%
M Matrix Related Failure
N Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl
ND
NJ
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Page 5 of 5
Range Anlst
Q
R
V
V
VI
VJ
UL
X
Y
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
/\
h
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
NI A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
Date Time
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DVP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +1-the
RL is used to evaluate the DVP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
)
Method/Analysis Information
Product:
Analytical Method:
Analytical Batch Number:
Sample ID
314781001
314781002
1202784845
1202784846
1202784847
1202784848
1202784849
Radiochemistry Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 314781
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
EPA 900.1 Modified
1265406
Client ID
MW-31 11062012
MW-32 110620'12
Method Blank (MB)
314781002(MW-32_11062012) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
314781002(MW-32_11062012) Matrix Spike (MS)
314781002(MW-32_11062012) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-RAD-A-010 REV# 14.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information
All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information
Standard solutions for these analysis are NIST traceable or verified with a NIST traceable standard and used
before the expiration dates.
Sample Geometry
All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Ouality Control (OC) Information:
Blank Information
The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 314781002 (MW-32_11062012).
QC Information
All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
Samples were recounted due to low recovery. The recounts are reported.
Chemical Recoveries
All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMIOO 1 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 314781 GEL Work Order: 314781
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
Review IValidation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all eLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: C3"l O~ <:::J . /Y.. l... ( lIi (T tt Name: He~herMcCarty
Date: 27 NOV 2012 Title: Analyst II
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 314781
Parmname NOM
Rad Gas Flow
Batch 1265406
QC1202784846 314781002 DUP
Gross Radium Alpha
Uncertainty
QC1202784849 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha 556
Uncertainty
QC1202784845 MB
Gross Radium Alpha
Uncertainty
QC1202784847 314781002 MS
Gross Radium Alpha 560
Uncertainty
QC 1202784848 314781002 MSD
Gross Radium Alpha 560
Uncertainty
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
QC Summar:y
Sample Qual QC Units RPD%
2.97 3.71 pCilL 22.2
+1-0.524 +1-0.587
466 pCi/L
+1-6.37
U 1.00 pCi/L
+1-0.208
2.97 467 pCilL
+1-0.524 +1-6.28
2.97 459 pCi/L 1.80
+1-0.524 +1-6.16
A
B
BD
C
D
E
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
Estimated Value
ReDort Date: November 27, 2012
Page lof 2
REC% Range Anlst
(0% -100%) KDFI
83.9 (75%-125%)
82.9 (75%-125%)
81.4 (0%-20%)
Date Ti
11124/12 1
11124112 1
11/24112 1
11124112 1
11124112 1
.F
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H
K
L
M
M
N
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Matrix Related Failure
Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 314781 Page 2 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Ran~e Anlst
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl
ND
NJ
Q
R
V
VI
VJ
UL
X
Y
/\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but J?ot detected above the cRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
N/ A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
Date Ti
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater tha
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
l!1=t-1 Laboratories LLC
a member of The GEL Group INC PO Box 30712 Charleston, SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Gharleston, SC 29407
P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178
February 07, 2013
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: White Mesa Mill GW
Work Order: 315987
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on November 30, 2012. This revised data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures. This data package has been revised to correct the client
sample ID for 315987011.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4505.
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Heather Shaffer
Proj ect Manager
, 1111 11111.1 11111 111 III 111111 1
&h~
www.gel.com
February 07, 2013
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 315987
Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on November 30,
2012 for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All
sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. GEL did not report As on sample
ID 315987010(MW-22_11262012) ..
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following samples:
Laboratory ID Client ID
315987001 MW-01 11272012
315987002 MW-02 11272012
315987003 MW-03 11282012
315987004 MW-03A 11292012
315987005 MW-05 11272012
315987006 MW-12 11272012
315987007 MW-14 11272012
315987008 MW-17 11282012
315987009 MW-18 11262012
315987010 MW-22 11262012
315987011 MW-24 11292012
315987012 MW-65 11272012
315987013 MW-70 11282012
Case Narrative:
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler Receipt
Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: Metals and Radiochemistry.
Heather Shaffer
Proj ectManager
J>ag~; , of 2-GEL Laboratories, LLC
!
Project #: GEL Chain of Custody and Analytical Request 2040 Savage Road
GEL Quote#: Charleston, SC 29407
COC Number (I): GEL Work Order Number: 3159~'7 Phone: [phone]
I PO Number: Fax: [phone]
Client Name: "f'" .-\. t:.ne(~ rJ..e.. ~ Phone #: 'i ~ b 7g -:>2i, Sample Analysis Requested (5) (Fill in the number of containers for each test)
Project/Site Name: S -.' r. '),.\ G-ro,,-,(\c\w!>-+ e~ '" H ~ Fax #: Should this l-
I ;2..Cl:!.... ~ <--Preservative Type (6) ~rY\lo... ,nv\y = '<-'< sample be .;
Address: ~w·~ }4 J ~lC\t1jl~q gysiJ ... "3 bY2.S ~ lX\ considered: c 0 CJ d ~'~ ... Comments
Collected by: ~~l net ~on;J~~ &~fr~" 'Fkl(Y1e..1
0 V). -~<-.J Send Results To: l-f
1l ~ \... f-i:V'1 Note: extra sample 'is (; .c ·v
"Time .. ~ S r~ ../', \.. required for sample "Date Collected ;. 1>0 = .J').
Sample ID Collected QC Code Field Sample <.1 a; = ~ ~& specific QC or -; (Military) (7) Filtered PI Matrix (l) 0 <
• For composites -indicate start and stop date/rime (mm-dd-yy) ~ U Q tV ~ (hhmm) <'J VI -:r =: l-I-
M\/0-0L Jl1.7201::2.. \1/;21/J':2. 04S6 ;-J '.J (1-v) J... 'X Y. \
!\\vJ-D.:2.JI272DI2 )1/;1!i2 08SS tJ V GV) 2. 'I Y-. l
M W-03_ll U2 0 \2. n/;zg/i2 i325 N V G-W 'j "; 'f ' I
1~~V-03A. i 12'1'701'2 11/21/)'2 07$ tJ V &W -, -X \f.-I ""-
Nw-'~'~ "II '!;'-'rT7 I v__ _;.LJ..)_ \ 11 '7 -"?/ r'? ,--I.. -)Si.4S ;J Y &w 2 ). !~
J1W-i2-))21.J.C12 11/2.7/i2 tlYO IJ V (;~J .-'\ ) ~ I ...L. I
~\'w-14_ 11'2.72012 "-j'7/} ,.., '\335 /J Y &~ -, Y. '" 11,-, ..(. -"-
f'v1 Vv-l7_ i j2g:l0 12.. n/;z.~i2 lO4S ;J V &w "") "}. Y-. I -'
Jv1 VJ-) ~_112b2.0 12 n!.2(./} 2. } 351.) IJ V &w 1 ~ Y. \
MVJ-21_} )2.~/2Oj2 '1/'-"" II'? I .. -4~J ...... 1:36C /J Y bW I 't 'X
TAT Requested: Normal: I Rush: Specify: (Subject to Surcharge) lFax Results: Yes / {~ Circle Deliverable: C of A I QC Summary I Level 1 / Level 2 I Level 3 I Level 4
Remarks: Are there any known hazards applicable to these samples? If so, please list the hazards Sam12le Collection Time Zone
"\,vJ-l~ tA('\~ Jvtlv 22-h<>--.ic.. ?(~v;c.v.::;' kb BD+tiC~' Eastern Pacific
Central Other
VMountaiO\
Chain of Custody Signatures Sample Shipping and Delivery "Details
. Relinquished By (Sigled) Date Time ~ceived by (signed) Date Time IPlj~ GEL PM:
1~:J.v\A'~ »~4L 11/2..4/:2J)}'2. HDO //-3D-fJ ;;7'/5 Method of Shipment: Date Shipped:
'--!
2 2 Airbill #:
3 I 3 Airbill#:
I.) Chain of Custody Numrr" Client Determined For Lab Receiving Use Only
2.) QC Codes: N '" Normal Sample. TO'" Trip Blank. FD = Field Duplicate. EB'" Equipment Blank. MS = Matrix Spike Sample. MSD '" Matrix Spike Duplicate Sample. G = Grab. C = Composite
3.} Field Filtered: For liquid matrices. indicate with a -Y -for yes the sample was field filtered or -N -for sample was not field filtered. Custody Seal Intact?
4.) Matrix Codes: DW"Orinking Water, GW=GroundwDter. SW=Surface Water. WW=Waste Water. W=Water. SO=Soil. SD=Sedimem. SL=Sludgc:. SS=Solid Waste. O=Oil. F=Filter. P=Wipe. U=Urine, F=Fecal. N=Nasal YES NO
S.) Sample Analysis Requested: Analytical method requested (i.e. 8260B. 60 I OSn410A) and number of containers provided for each (i.e. 82608 -3. 60108174701. • I).
6.) Preservative Type: HA I", Hydrochloric Acid. NI = Nitric Acid. SH = Sodium Hydroxide. SA = Sulfuric Acid: AA = Ascorbic Acid. HX = Hexane. ST;; Sodium Thiosulfate.lfno preservative is added "'leave tield blank
Cooler Temp: ~ C
WHITE = LABORATORY YELLOW = FI LE PINK = CLIENT
Pas.;; 2:.. OJ --:> GEI,.. Laboratories, LLC
Project #: GEL Chain of Custody and Analytical Request 2040 Savage Road
GEL Quote #: Charleston. SC 29407
COC Number (I): GEL Work Order Number: 315'96:f-Phone: [phone]
PO Number: Fax: [phone]
Client Name: / ... ~ Phone #: Sample Analysis Requested (5) (Fill in the number of containers for each test)
Project/Site Name: ~ nVVlr C\.~ rC\C\ -tbx#: '" \--4 \-' Should this "" 4.1 '2, '< <--Preservative Type (6) = ~ v' '-) sample be .;
Address: ... g considered: I: --" e '~ u 0, '-'.,J! ~3 Comments e Collected by: Send Results To: 'E ... l... ~< Note: extra sample 1S 4.1 ~ '; ~ &-J)../:
"Time .€ -; e \ft. required for sample ·Oille Collected DO = ',J') 0
Sample ID Collected QC Code Field Sample a: = ~ 0~ specific QC .. -; (Military) (J.) Filtered (JI Matrix (4) 0 «
• For composites -indicate start and stop date/time (mm-dd-yy) :; U -=
. "q)
(bhmm) .. ~ ~ i% F-
/v\w-24_ )\:2~.2C/\! 1 \ /:J.ti/ i '! Cb"SS ,rJ Y '. '; "1 &'vJ -I< )<
fjvJ-f,S_t}27201"2. n/;:1. 7/ 12. Cf<SS N ,...) &W "" 'f 'f \ '---
/'Irv0-70_ )/.2£:2.6)2 1l/:Lg!i2 iD'-iS ~ -.) G-W ,..., X 'X . I -
2, X-X
TAT Requested: Normal: ./ Rush: Specify: (Subjcct to Surcharge) IFax Results: Yes / (i~ No) Circle Deliverable: C of A / OC Summary / Level 1 / Level 2 / Level 3 / Level 4
Remarks: Are there any known hazards applicable to these samples? If so, please list the hazards '--"" S!!ml2l~ ~oll~~tion Time ZQn~
Eastern Pacific
Central
l-iiountam.,
Other
Chain of Custody Signatures Sample Shipping and Deli;e.:y Details
. Relinquished By (Signed) Date Time 1'd by (sign.d) Date Tim.
)jJdL Ji/~qj.1DtI GEL PM:
1,") rtJ1.J7t)-( \ It'D 1 ~(/JuJ-II~gb ~'d 01,'/5 Method of Shipment: Date Shipped:
2 0 2 Airbill #:
3 3 Airbill #:
I.) Chain of Custody Number'" Client Determined For Lab Receiving Use Only
2.) QC Codes: N .. Normal Sample. TO'" Trip Blank. FD'" Field Duplicate. EB '" Equipment Blank. MS" Matrix Spike Sample. MSD "" Matrix Spike Duplicate Sample. G '" Grab. C '" Composite
3.) Field Filtered: For liquid matrices. indicate with a • Y • for yes the samplc was field filtered or • N • for sample was nol field filtered, Custody Seal Intact?
4.) Matrix Codes: DW"'Drinking Wllter. GW=Oroundwater. SW"Surface Water. WW",Waste Wllter. W .. Water. SO"Soil. SP=Sediment. SL"Sludgc. SS-Solid Waste. O"Oil. F"Filter. P-Wipe. U"Urine. F"Feeal. N=Nasal YES NO
5.) Sam pic Analyaia Requested: Analytical method requested (Le. 8%608, 6010Bn470A) and number of containers provided for cach (i.e. 82608 ·3. 6010Bl7470A • I). Cooler Temp:
6.) P,'escrvative Type: HA .. Hydrochloric Acid. NJ ~ Nitric Acid. SH '" Sodium Hydroxidc. SA .. Sulfuric Acid; AA '" Ascorbic Acid. HX .. Hexane. ST'" Sodium Thiosulfate. If no preservative is added -leave field blank ~ C
WHITE:z LABORATORY YELLOW = FILE PINK = CLIENT
~ I Laboratories LLC
Client: ~J \\) fV... T
Received By: \-->. W ~
Suspected Hazard Information
COC/Samples marked as radioactive?
Classified Radioactive II or m by RSO?
COC/Samples marked containing PCBs?
Package, COC, and/or Samples marked as
beryllium or asbestos containing?
Shipped as a DOT Hazardous?
Samples identified as Foreign Soil?
Sample Receipt Criteria
1 Shipping containers received intact
and sealed? X
2 Samples requiring cold preservation
within (0 < 6 deg. C)?* X
2a Daily check perfonned and passed on
IR temperature gun? )(
3 Chain of custody documents included
wi shipment? xl
4 Sample containers intact and sealed? )(
5 Samples requiring chemical
preservation at proper pH? X
6 VOA vials free of headspace (defined
as < 6mm bubble)?
7 Are Encore containers present?
8 Samples received within holding
time? X
9 ISample ID's on COC match ID's on
X bottles?
10 Date & time on COC match date &
time on bottles? ~
11 Number of containers received match
number indicated on CaC? X
12 Are sample contain,ers identifiable as
)( GEL provided?
13 Icoc fonn is properly signed in
X [relinqui~hedlreceived sections?
X
14 Carrier and tracking number.
Comments (Use Continuation Form if needed):
SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
SDG/ARlCOCIWg{kOrder: ,~I .~9 13+ of.
Date Received: ~ ~)\} I .~ 0 Q 0 t r:J
~ *lfNet Counts> lOOcpm on samples not marked "radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further
in vestigation.
V Maximum Net Counts Observed* (Observed Counts -Area Background Counts): II (1./ 1~.A.
'X If yes, Were swipes taken of sample contatiners < action levels?
X If yes, samples are to be segregeated as Safety Controlled Samples, and opened by the GEL Safety Group. 'x' Hazard Class Shipped: UN#:
x
Comments/Qualifiers (Required for Non.Conforming Items)
Circle Applicable:
Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Preservation Method: Ice bags Blue ice Dry ice None Other (describe)
*all temperatures are recorded in Celsius
1. Device Serial #:
:;"WlJu<u, Temperature Device Serial # (If Applicable):
Circle Applicable:
Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Sample ID's, containers affected and observed pH:
If added, T .ot#:
[Sample ID's and containers affected:
[(If yes, immediately deliverto Volatiles laboratory)
ID's and tests affected:
Sample ID's and containers affected:
ISample ID's affected:
Sample ID's affected:
FedEx Air c FedEx Ground
!3()/5
8DI5
Circle Applicable:
UPS Field Services
it , .... _. •
Courier Other
-k'r./.. T' AI'''"'''' d-I I PM (or PMA) review: Initials ----1+ I ~~ ~~. ___ Date --1."::'-c:.."'X-_...,. \..~/' ____ Page ---L-of _ v ~
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
GEL Work Order/SDG: 315987
Client SDG: 315987
Semi-annual
Project Manager: Heather Shaffer
Project Name: DNMI00100 White Mesa Mill GW
DW16138 Purchase Order:
Package Level: LEVEL3
EDD Format: EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample 10 Client Sample Desc.
315987001 MW-01_11272012
315987002 MW-02_11272012
315987003 MW-03_11282012
315987004 MW-03A_11292012
315987005 MW-05_11272012
315987006 MW-12_11272012
315987007 MW-14_11272012
315987008 MW-17 _11282012
315987009 MW-18_11262012
315987010 MW-22_11262012
315987011 MW-24_11292012
315987012 MW-65_11272012
315987013 MW-70_11282012
Client Sample 10 Status T ests/Methods
-001 MW-01_11272012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVW EPA 245 Mercury
REVW 200.8/200.2 TAL
-002 MW-02_11272012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVW EPA 245 Mercury
REVW 200.8/200.2 TAL
-003 MW-03_11282012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVW EPA 245 Mercury
REVW 200.8/200.2 TAL
-004 MW-03A_11292012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Collect
Date & Time
27-NOV-12 09:50
27-NOV-12 08:55
28-NOV-1213:25
29-NOV-12 07:50
27-NOV-1215:45
27-NOV-12 11 :40
27-NOV-1213:35
28-NOV-1210:45
26-NOV-12 13:50
26-NOV-1213:00
29-NOV-12 06:53
27-NOV-12 08:55
28-NOV-1210:45
Product
Reference
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
use product group
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
use product group
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
use product group
Gross Alpha
Report Date: 07-FEB-13
Work Order: 315987
Page 1 of 5
Work Order Due Date: 21-DEC-12 Collector: C
Package Due Date: 19-DEC-12 Prelogin #: 20121198280
Project Workdef ID: 1294356
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
EDD Due Date: 21-DEC-12
Due Date:
HXS1
Receive Time # of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
30-NOV-12 09:15 0 2
30-NOV-12 09:15 0 2
30-NOV-12 09:15 0 2
30-NOV-12 09:15 0 2
30-NOV-12 09:15 0 2
30-NOV-12 09:15 0 2
30-NOV-12 09:15 0 2
30-NOV-12 09:15 0 2
30-NOV-12 09:15 0
30-NOV-12 09:15 0 2
30-NOV-12 09:15 0 2
30-NOV-12 09:15 0 2
30-NOV-12 09:15 0 2
Fax Date PM Comments
21-DEC-12
Lab Fax Days to
Matrix Due Date Process
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
Aux Data
y
3
y
3
y
3
y
CofC#
Prelog Lab Field
Group QC QC
Receive
Codes
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Report Date: 07-FEB-13
Work Order: 315987
Page 2 of 5
Liquid Temperature (C) 3
REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVW EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVW 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
-005 MVV-05_11272012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Cooler Seal Undisturbed y
Liquid Temperature (C) 3 REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVW EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVW 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
-006 MVV-12_11272012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Cooler Seal Undisturbed y
Liquid Temperature (C) 3 REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVW EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVW 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
-007 MVV-14_11272012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Cooler Seal Undisturbed y
Liquid Temperature (C) 3 REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVW EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVW 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
-008 MVV-17_11282012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Cooler Seal Undisturbed y
Liquid Temperature (C) 3 REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVW 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
-009 MVV-18_11262012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Cooler Seal Undisturbed y
Liquid Temperature (C) 3 REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVW EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVW 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
-010 MVV-22_11262012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Cooler Seal Undisturbed y
Liquid Temperature (C) 3 REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVW EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVW 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
-011 MVV-24_11292012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Cooler Seal Undisturbed y
Liquid Temperature (C) 3 REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVW EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVW 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
-012 MVV-65_11272012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha Cooler Seal Undisturbed y
Liquid Temperature (C) 3 REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVW EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVW 200.8/200,2 TAL use product group
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
-013 MVV-70_11282012
Product: MER245_L
REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL
VVorkdeflD: 1308786
Method: EPA 245.1/245.2
Product Description: EPA 245 Mercury
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
use product group
In Product Group? Yes
Samples: 001,002,003,004,005,006,007,008,009,010,011,012,013
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7439-97-6 Mercury
Product: ICPTAL20L VVorkdeflD: 1308787 In Product Group? Yes
Method: EPA 200.7
Product Description: 200.7/200.2 TAL
Samples: 001,002,003,004,005,006,007,008,009,010,011,012,013
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7440-70-2 Calcium
7440-47-3 Chromium
7440-48-4 Cobalt
7439-89-6 Iron
7439-95-4 Magnesium
7439-96-5 Manganese
7439-98-7 Molybdenum
7440-02-0 Nickel
7440-09-7 Potassium
7440-23-5 Sodium
7440-31-5 Tin
7440-62-2 Vanadium
7440-66-6 Zinc
Report Date: 07-FEB-13
Work Order: 315987
Page 3 of 5
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
y
3
Group Name: PROD_GROUP02
Client RDl or
PQl & Unit
.5
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Group Name: PROD _ GROUP02
Client RDl or Reporting PQl & Unit Units
500 ug/L
25 ug/L
10 ug/L
30 ug/L
500 ug/L
10 ug/L
10 ug/L
20 ug/L
500 ug/L
500 ug/L
100 ug/L
15 ug/L
10 ug/L
Group Reference: Full metals suite
Path: Standard
Product Reference: use product group
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
Group Reference: Full metals suite
Path: Standard
Product Reference: use product group
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? inQC? List?
REG · Y Y Yes
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Product: MIMTAL20_L Workdef 10: 1308788
Method: EPA 200.8
Product D~scription: 200.8/200.2 TAL
In Product Group? Yes
Samples: 001,002,003,004,005,006,007,008,009,010,011,012,013
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS #
7440-38-2
7440-41-7
7440-43-9
7440-50-8
7439-92-1
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
7440-28-0
7440-61-1
Parmname
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Copper
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Product: GFCTORAL Workdef 10: 1297250
Method: EPA 900.1 Modified
Product Description: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
In Product Group? No
Samples: 001,002,003,004,005, 006, 007, 008, 009, 010,011, 012, 013
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS #
Contingent
Tests
Parmname
Gross Radium Alpha
Action Product Name
login Requirements:
Requirement
Description
Group Name: PROD_GROUP02
Client RDl or
PQl & Unit
5
.5
.5
10
5
10
.5
.3
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQl & Unit
Samples
Reporting
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Reporting
Units
pCi/L
Include? Comments
Report Date: 07-FEB-13
Work Order: 315987
Page 4 of 5
Group Reference: Full metals suite
Path: Standard
Product Reference: use product group
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Peer Review by: ____________ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Report Date: 07-FEB-13
Work Order: 315987
Page 5 of 5
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
Sample Analysis
Sample ID
315987001
315987002
315987003
315987004
315987005
315987006
315987007
315987008
315987009
315987010
315987011
315987012
315987013
1202789318
1202802539
1202789319
1202802540
1202789322
1202789526
1202789320
1202789525
1202789321
1202789527
1202789418
1202802113
1202789419
1202802114
1202789422
1202802117
Metals Fractional Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 315987
Client ID
MW-Ol 11272012
MW-02 11272012
MW-03 11282012
MW-03A 11292012
MW-05 11272012
MW-12 11272012
MW-14 11272012
MW-17 11282012
MW-18 11262012
MW-22 11262012
MW-24 11292012
MW-65 11272012
MW-70 11282012
Method Blank (MB) ICP
Method Blank (MB) ICP
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
315987002(MW-02_11272012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
315987010(MW-22_11262012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
315987002(MW-02_11272012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
315987010(MW-22_11262012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
315987002(MW-02_11272012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
315987010(MW-22_11262012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
Method Blank (MB) ICP-MS
Method Blank (MB) ICP-MS
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
315987001(MW-Ol_11272012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
315987001(MW-Ol_11272012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
1202789424
1202802119
1202789420
1202802115
1202789423
1202802118
1202789421
1202802116
1202789425
1202802120
1202792202
1202792203
1202792204
1202792205
315987009(MW-18_11262012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
315987009(MW-18_11262012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
315987001(MW-Ol_11272012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
315987001(MW-Ol_11272012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
315987009(MW-18_11262012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
315987009(MW-18_11262012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
315987001(MW-Ol_11272012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
315987001(MW-Ol_11272012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
315987009(MW-18_11262012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
315987009(MW-18_11262012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
Method Blank (MB) CV AA
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
316168002(CALA-13-24562D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
316168002(CALA-13-24562S) Matrix Spike (MS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Method/Analysis Information
Analytical Batch:
Prep Batch:
Standard Operating
Procedures:
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
1267256, 1272112, 1267296, 1271880 and 1268494
1267254, 1272111, 1267295, 1271878 and 1268493
GL-MA-E-013 REV# 21, GL-MA-E-016 REV# 9, GL-MA-E-014
REV# 24 and GL-MA-E-OI0 REV# 25
EPA 200.7, EPA 200.8 and EPA 245.11245.2
EPA 200.2 and EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
The SOP stated above has been prepared based on technical research and testing conducted by
GEL Laboratories, LLC. and with guidance from the regulatory documents listed in this
"Method/Analysis Information" section.
System Configuration
The Metals analysis-ICP was performed on a PE 7300 Optima radial/axial-viewing inductively
coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer. The instrument is equipped with a Burgener
nebulizer, cyclonic spray chamber, and yttrium or scandium internal standard. Operating
conditions for the ICP are set at a power level of 1500 watts. The instrument has a peristaltic
pump flow rate of I.4L/min, argon gas flows of 15 L/min and 0.2 L/min for the torch and
auxiliary gases, and a flow setting ofO.65L/min for the nebulizer.
The Metals analysis -ICPMS was performed on a Perkin Elmer ELAN 6100E inductively
coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS)~ The instrument is equipped with a cross-flow
nebulizer, quadrupole mass spectrometer, and dual mode electron multiplier detector. Internal
standards of scandium, germanium, indium, tantalum, and/or lutetium were utilized to cover the
mass spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W power and combined argon pressures of
360+1-7 kPa for the plasma and auxiliary gases, and 0.85 L/min carrier gas flow, and an initial
lens voltage of 5.2.
The Metals analysis -ICPMS was performed on a Perkin Elmer ELAN 9000 inductively coupled
plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The instrument is equipped with a cross-flow nebulizer,
quadrupole mass spectrometer, and dual mode electron multiplier detector. Internal standards of
scandium, germanium, indium, tantalum, and/or lutetium were utilized to cover the mass
spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W power and combined argon pressures of 360+1-
7 kPa for the plasma and auxiliary gases, and 0.85 L/min carrier gas flow, and an initial lens
voltage of 5.2.
The Metals analysis-Mercury was performed on a Perkin-Elmer Flow Injection Mercury System
(FIMS-100) automated mercury analyzer. The instrument consists of a cold vapor atomic
absorption spectrometer set to detect mercury at a wavelength of 253.7 nm. Sample introduction
through the flow injection system is performed via a peristaltic pump at 9 mL/min and nitrogen
carrier gas rate of 80 mL/min.
Calibration Information
Instrument Calibration
All initial calibration requirements have been met for this sample delivery group (SDG).
CRDL Requirements
All CRDL standards met the advisory control limits with the exceptions of: ICP-MS. As
recovered high. However, all sample results are less than the RDL, so the data is reported as is.
ICP-MS.
ICSAlICSAB Statement
All interference check samples (ICSA and ICSAB) associated with this SDG met the established
acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Blank (CCB) Requirements
All continuing calibration blanks (CCB) bracketing this batch met the established acceptance
criteria.
Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) Requirements
All continuing calibration verifications (CCV) bracketing this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Quality Control (QC) Information
Method Blank (MB) Statement
The MBs analyzed with this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Recovery
The LCS spike recoveries met the acceptance limits.
Quality Control (QC) Sample Statement
The following samples were selected as the quality control (QC) samples for this SDG:
315987002 (MW-02_11272012), 315987010 (MW-22_11262012)-ICP, 315987001 (MW-
01_11272012), 315987009 (MW-18_11262012)-ICP-MS and 316168002 (CALA-13-24562)-
CVAA.
Matrix Spike (MS) Recovery Statement
The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the MS analyses are evaluated when the sample
concentration is less than four times (4X) the spike concentration added. The MS met the
recommended quality control acceptance criteria for percent recoveries for all applicable
analytes with the exceptions of manganese and potassium.
Duplicate Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The relative percent difference (RPD) obtained from the designated sample duplicate (DUP) is
evaluated based on acceptance criteria of 20% when the sample is >5X the contract required
detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the
contract required detection limit (RL), a control of +/-RL is used to .evaluate the DUP results. All
applicable analytes met these requirements with the exceptions of calcium, iron, magnesium,
manganese, potassium and sodium.
Serial Dilution % Difference Statement
The serial dilution is used to assess matrix suppression or enhancement. Raw element
concentrations 25x the IDL/MDL for CV AA, 50X the IDL/MDL for ICP and 100X the
IDL/MDL for ICP-MS analyses are applicable for serial dilution assessment. All applicable
analytes met the established criteria of less than 10% difference (%D) with the exceptions of
calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium.
Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Recovery Statement
The percent recovery (%R) obtained from the MSD analyses are evaluated when the sample
concentration is less than four time (4X) the spike concentration added. All applicable elements
met the acceptance criteria.
MS/MSD Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The RPD( s) between the MS and MSD met the acceptance limits.
Technical Information
Holding Time Specifications
GEL assigns holding times based on the associated methodology, which assigns the date and
time from sample collection of sample receipt. Those holding times expressed in hours are
calculated in the AlphaLIMS system. Those holding times expressed as days expire at midnight
on the day of expiration. All samples in this SDG met the specified holding time.
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
All procedures were performed as stated in the SOP.
Sample Dilutions
Dilutions are performed to minimize matrix interferences resulting from elevated mineral
element concentrations present in solid samples and/or to bring over range target analyte
concentrations into the linear calibration range of the instruments. Dilutions were required for
this SDG in order to minimize tin suppression due to matrix interferences on the ICP. Samples
required dilutions in order to bring raw sodium, calcium manganese and/or magnesium values
within the linear range of the instrument, and for potassium, tin and/or chromium, copper and
potassium that those elements interfere with, in order to ensure that the inter-element correction
factors were valid on the ICP. Sample 315987010 on the ICPMS required a dilution for
cadmium in order to bring over ranged concentrations within the linear range of the instrument.
Preparation Information
The samples in this SDG were prepared exactly according to the cited SOP.
Miscellaneous Information
Electronic Packaging Comment
This data package was generated using an electronic data processing program referred to as
virtual packaging. In an effort to increase quality and efficiency, the laboratory has developed
systems to generate all data packages electronically. The following change from traditional
packages should be noted:
Analyst/peer reviewer initials and dates are not present on the electronic data files. Presently, all
initials and dates are present on the original raw data. These hard copies are temporarily stored in
the laboratory. An electronic signature page inserted after the case narrative will include the data
validator's signature and title. The signature page also includes the data qualifiers used in the
fractional package. Data that are not generated electronically, such as hand written pages, will be
scanned and inserted into the electronic package.
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate
from referenced SOP or contractual documents. The following DER was generated for this SDG:
DER ID1151133. A copy is included in the Miscellaneous Data section of this package.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this SDG.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has
met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case
narrative.
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data
designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion
of the data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
Reviewer: ~~ate:._....::;;1-+=\S~I'!""<'3L...-.-_____ _
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis Report
for
DNMIOO 1 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 315987 GEL Work Order: 315987
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
*. A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
E Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
N Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
U Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
The designation ND, if present, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above
the limit as defined in the 'U' qualifier above.
This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC
standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Heather Shaffer.
Reviewed by
c::
GEL LASORA TORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston/SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
EPA 200.2
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-Ol 11272012
Lab Sample ID: 315987001
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
EPA 245.11245.2
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
BXAI
AXS5
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 7,2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Chent snG: j DY~ / Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
12120112 2308 1272111
12/06112 1558 1268493
Analyst Comments
SRL ~ Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-02 11272012
Lab Sample ID: 315987002 ----------------------
)arameter
EPA 200.2
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
Qualifier Result
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EP A 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
BXAI
AXS5
Report Date: February 7, 2013
Proiect: DNMIOOI00
Client ID: DNMIOO 1
ClIent SUG: 315987
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
12120112 2308 1272111
12/06112 1558 1268493
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
larameter
EPA 200.2
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-03 11282012
Lab Sample ID: 315987003
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
BXAI
AXS5
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 7,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
Chent sua: .:51 )y~ / Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
12/20112 2308 1272111
12/06/12 1558 1268493
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LASORA TORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
EPA 200.2
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-03A 11292012
Lab Sample ID: 315987004
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
1 EPA 245 .11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
BXAI
AXS5
Report Date: February 7,2013
Proiect: DNMI00100
ClientID: DNMI001
--cIient SDG: j DY~ / Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
12120/12 2308 1272111
12/06/12 1558 1268493
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
EPA 200.2
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-05 11272012
Lab Sample ID: 315987005
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EP A 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
-Method Description
EPA 245.1/245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
BXAI
AXS5
Report Date: February 7,2013
Prolect: DNMIOOI00
Client ID: DNMIOO 1
Chent SDG: 3 15987 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
12120/12 2308 1272111
12/06/12 1558 1268493
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LASORA TORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
EPA 200.2
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-12 11272012
Lab Sample ID: 315987006
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 245.1/245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
BXA1
AXS5
Report Date: February 7,2013
Project: DNMIOOI00
Client ID: DNMIOOI
Chent SDG: 3 15987 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
12/20112 2308 1272111
12/06/12 1558 1268493
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
EPA 200.2
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-14 11272012
Lab Sample ID: 315987007
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
1 EP A 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
BXA1
AXS5
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 7,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
Chent SUG: j DY~ / Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
12120/12 2308 1272111
12/06/12 1558 1268493
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORA TORIESLLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
EPA 200.2
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-17 11282012
Lab Sample ID: 315987008
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
EPA 245.11245.2
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
BXAI
AXS5
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 7,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
Chent SuG: 3 15987 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
12120112 2308 1272111
12/06/12 1558 1268493
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
EPA 200.2
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-18 11262012
Lab Sample ID: 315987009
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
1 EPA 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
BXAI
AXS5
Report Date: February 7,2013
Proiect: DNMIOOI00
Client ID: DNMIOO 1
ClIent SUU: 3 I 5987 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
12/20112 2308 1272111
12/06112 1558 1268493
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
}arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-22 11262012
Lab Sample ID: 315987010
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
9 EPA 200.8
Report Date: February 7, 2013
Proiect: DNMIOOI00
Client ID: DNMIOO 1
Chent SUG: j DY~ / Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
AXS5 12/06/12 1558 1268493
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
EPA 200.2
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-24 11292012
Lab Sample ID: 315987011
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
1 EPA 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
BXA1
AXS5
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 7, 2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Chent SDG: 3 15987 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
12120/12 2308 1272111
12/06/12 1558 1268493
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
EPA 200.2
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-65 11272012
Lab Sample ID: 315987012
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
1 EP A 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
BXAI
AXS5
Report Date: February 7,2013
Project: DNMIOOI00
Client ID: DNMIOOI
ClIent SVG: j DY~ / Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
12120112 2308 1272111
12/06112 1558 1268493
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LL.C
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
EPA 200.2
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-70 11282012
Lab Sample ID: 315987013
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
EP A 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
BXAI
AXS5
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 7,2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
ClIent SUG: 315987 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
12/20/12 2308 1272111
12/06/12 1558 1268493
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar:y ReDort Date: February 7, 2013 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page lof 7
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 315987
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
\1etals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1267296
QCI202789420 315987001 DUP
Beryllium U 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A PRB 12/1411220:0
Selenium U 5.00 U 5.00 ug/L N/A
QC1202789423 315987009 DUP
Beryllium U 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A 12119112 14:3
Selenium U 5.00 U 5.00 ug/L N/A
QC 1202789419 LCS
Beryllium 50.0 57.6 ug/L 115 (85%-115%) 12114112 19:41
Selenium 50.0 55.3 ug/L 111 (85%-115%)
QC I 2027894 I 8 MB
Beryllium U 0.500 ug/L 12114112 19:3-
Selenium U 5.00 ug/L
QCI202789421 315987001 MS
Beryllium 50.0 U 0.500 57.9 ug/L 116 (75%-125%) 1211411220:1
Selenium 50.0 U 5.00 58.4 ug/L 117 (75%-125%)
QC I 202789425 315987009 MS
Beryllium 50.0 U 0.500 46.9 ug/L 93.8 (75%-125%) 12/19/12 14:4
Selenium 50.0 U 5.00 61.7 ug/L 123 (75%-125%)
QC I 202789422 315987001 SDILT
Beryllium U 1.00 U 1.00 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 1211411220:1
Selenium U 7.50 U 7.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
QC1202789424 315987009 SDILT
Beryllium U 1.00 U 1.00 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 12119112 14:4
Selenium U 7.50 U 7.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
3atch 1271880
QC1202802115 315987001 DUP
Arsenic U 5.00 U 5.00 ug/L N/A SKJ 12/20/1220:0'
Cadmium U 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A
Lead U 1.00 U 1.00 ug/L N/A
Thallium U 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A
Uranium U 0.300 U 0.300 ug/L N/A
QC1202802118 315987009 DUP
Arsenic U 5.00 U 5.00 ug/L N/A 12120112 18:41
Cadmium U 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A
Lead U 1.00 U 1.00 ug/L N/A
Thallium 3.20 3.34 ug/L 4.37 (0%-20%)
Uranium 43.9 45.6 ug/L 3.79 (0%-20%)
QC1202802114 LCS
Arsenic 50.0 52.2 ug/L 104 (85%-115%) 1212011220:01
Cadmium 50.0 53.0 ug/L 106 (85%-115%)
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summarl:
Workorder: 315987 Page 2 of 7
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
\letals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1271880
Lead 50.0 55.2 ug/L 110 (85%-115%)
Thallium 50.0 53.1 ug/L 106 (85%-115%) SKJ 12/20/1220:0
Uranium 50.0 57.3 ug/L 115 (85%-115%)
QC1202802113 MB
Arsenic U 5.00 ug/L 1212011220:0
Cadmium U 0.500 ug/L
Lead U 1.00 ug/L
Thallium U 0.500 ug/L
Uranium U 0.300 ug/L
QC1202802116 315987001 MS
Arsenic 50.0 U 5.00 54.0 ug/L 108 (75%-125%) 12/20112 19:4
Cadmium 50.0 U 0.500 50.2 ug/L 100 (75%-125%)
Lead 50.0 U 1.00 52.0 ug/L 104 (75%-125%)
Thallium 50.0 U 0.500 49.8 ug/L 99.6 (75%-125%)
Uranium 50.0 U 0.300 56.9 ug/L 114 (75%-125%) .
QC1202802120 315987009 MS
Arsenic 50.0 U 5.00 55.6 ug/L 111 (75%-125%) 12/20112 18:2,
Cadmium 50.0 U 0.500 50.5 ug/L 101 (75%-125%)
Lead 50.0 U 1.00 49.7 ug/L 99.3 (75%-125%)
Thallium 50.0 3.20 51.2 ug/L 95.9 (75%-125%)
Uranium 50.0 43.9 95.6 ug/L 103 (75%-125%)
QC1202802117 315987001 SDILT
Arsenic U 8.50 U 8.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 12120112 19:3
Cadmium U 0.550 U 0.550 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Lead U 2.50 U 2.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Thallium U 2.25 U 2.25 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Uranium U 0.335 U 0.335 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
QC1202802119 315987009 SDILT
Arsenic U 8.50 U 8.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 12120112 18:2:
Cadmium U 0.550 U 0.550 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Lead U 2.50 U 2.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Thallium 3.20 0.635 ug/L .781 (0%-10%)
Uranium 43.9 8.57 ug/L 2.53 (0%-10%)
3atch 1272960
QC1202804828 315987001 DUP
Copper U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A SKJ 01/04113 11:5
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A 01/03 /13 05:0,
QC1202804831 315987011 DUP
Copper U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A 01/04113 13:3-
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A 01/03/13 06:1
QC1202804827 LCS
Copper 50.0 53.6 ug/L 107 (85%-115%) 01/04113 11:4'
Silver 50.0 51.8 ug/L 104 (85%-115%) 01/03113 04:5
QC1202804826 MB
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar:y
Workorder: 315987 Page 4 of 7
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
\1etals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1267256
QC1202789319 LCS
Calcium 5000 5230 ug/L 105 (85%-115%) LS 12/20112 11:5
Chromium 500 515 ug/L 103 (85%-115%)
Cobalt 500 524 ug/L 105 (85%-115%)
Iron 5000 5150 ug/L 103 (85%-115%)
Magnesium 5000 5320 ug/L 106 (85%-115%)
Manganese 500 519 ugIL 104 (85%-115%)
Molybdenum 500 503 ug/L 101 (85%-115%)
Nickel 500 523 ug/L 105 (85%-115%)
Potassium 5000 5360 ugIL 107 (85%-115%)
Sodium 5000 5380 ug/L 108 (85%-115%)
Tin 500 517 ug/L 103 (85%-115%)
Vanadium 500 524 ug/L 105 (85%-115%)
Zinc 500 520 ug/L 104 (85%-115%)
QC1202789318 MB
Calcium U 500 ug/L 12120/12 11 :4'
Chromium U 25.0 ug/L
Cobalt U 10.0 ug/L
Iron U 30.0 ug/L
Magnesium U 500 ug/L
Manganese U 10.0 ug/L
Molybdenum U 10.0 ug/L
Nickel U 20.0 ug/L
Potassium U 500 ug/L
Sodium U 500 . ug/L
Tin U 100 ug/L
Vanadium U 15.0 ug/L
Zinc U 10.0 ug/L
QC1202789321 315987002 MS
Calcium 5000 330000 175000 ug/L N/A (75%-125%) 12/20112 12:0
Chromium 500 U 25.0 498 ug/L 99.5 (75%-125%)
Cobalt 500 U 10.0 500 ug/L 100 (75%-125%)
Iron 5000 U 30.0 5470 ug/L 109 (75%-125%)
Magnesium 5000 92400 67000 ug/L N/A (75%-125%)
Manganese 500 U 10.0 801 ug/L 160* (75%-125%)
Molybdenum 500 U 10.0 504 ug/L 100 (75%-125%)
Nickel 500 U 20.0 490 ug/L 98 (75%-125%)
Potassium 5000 10400 11900 ug/L 28.4* (75%-125%)
Sodium 5000 513000 178000 ug/L N/A (75%-125%)
Tin 500 U 100 431 ug/L 86.1 (75%-125%) 12/20112 15:3·
Vanadium 500 U 15.0 529 ug/L 105 (75%-125%) 12120112 12:0
Zinc 500 U 10.0 498 ug/L 97.8 (75%-125%)
QC 1202789527 315987010 MS
Workorder: 315987
Parmname
\1etals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1267256
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Sodium
Tin
Vanadium
Zinc
QC1202789322 315987002 SDILT
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Sodium
Tin
Vanadium
Zinc
QC1202789526 315987010 SDILT
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Sodium
Tin
Vanadium
Zinc
\1etals Analysis-Mercury
3atch 1268494
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Page 5 of 7
NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
5000
500
500
5000
5000
500
500
500
5000
5000
500
500
500
u
u
u
u
u
u
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
412000
25.0
469
85.0
1050000
43100
133
276
24200
288000
100
15.0
1220
330000
25.0 U
10.0 U
150
92400
10.0
10.0 U
20.0 U
10400
513000
125 U
15.0 U
16.5 U
412000
50.0 U
469
85.0 U
105000
4310
133
276
2420 U
288000
100 U
50.0 U
1220
422000
527
973
5100
1070000
44100
640
768
31600
299000
478
528
1750
35300
25.0
10.0
80.4
12900
63.3
10.0
20.0
1430
36000
125
15.0
16.5
80900
50.0
92.8
150
21300
865
28.7
53.6
2500
53600
100
50.0
235
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ugIL
ugIL
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ugIL
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ugIL
ugIL
ug/L
ug/L
46.4*
N/A
N/A
N/A
30*
N/A
N/A
N/A
31.5*
64.9*
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.9
N/A
.939
N/A
1.02
.52
8
2.9
N/A
6.9
N/A
N/A
3.3
N/A (75%-125%)
103 (75%-125%)
101 (75%-125%)
100 (75%-125%)
N/A (75%-125%)
N/A (75%-125%)
101 (75%-125%)
98.5 (75%-125%)
N/A (75%-125%)
N/A (75%-125%)
95.6 (75%-125%)
106 (75%-125%)
106 (75%-125%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
12/20112 12:4
LS 12/20112 16:1
12/20112 12:4
12/20112 16:1
12120/12 12:4
12/20112 16:1
12120112 12:4
12120112 16:1
12120112 12:4
12/20/12 12:0
12120/12 15:3'
12120112 12:0
12120112 12:5
12120112 16:21
12120/12 12 :5
12/20/12 16:21
12120112 12:5
12120/12 16:21
, 12120/12 12:5
12120/12 16:21
12120/12 12:5
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 315987 Page 3 of 7
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
\1etals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1272960
Copper U 10.0 ug/L 01104113 11 :4,
Silver U 10.0 ugIL SKJ 0110311304:4'
QC1202804829 315987001 MS
Copper 50.0 U 10.0 52.0 ug/L 98.9 (75%-125%) 01104/13 12:01
Silver 50.0 U 10.0 48.7 ug/L 97.4 (75%-125%) 01103/13 05:11
QC1202804833 315987011 MS
Copper 50.0 U 10.0 58.5 ugIL 101 (75%-125%) 01104/13 13:J.
Silver 50.0 U 10.0 47.0 ug/L 93 .9 (75%-125%) 01103113 06: 1
QC 1202804830 315987001 SDILT
Copper U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01104/13 12:0
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 0110311305:1. c QC1202804832 315987011 SDILT
Copper U 10.0 3.02 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01/04113 13:3'
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01103/13 06:21
\1etals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1267256
QC1202789320 315987002 DUP
Calcium-' 330000 168000 ug/L 64.8* (0%-20%) LS 12120112 11:5
Chromium U 25.0 U 25.0 ug/L N/A
Cobalt U 10.0 U 10.0 ugIL N/A
Iron U 30.0 370 ug/L 197* 1\ (+1-30.0)
Magnesium 92400 61800 ug/L 39.7* (0%-20%)
Manganese U 10.0 307 ug/L 204* 1\ (+1-10.0)
Molybdenum U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A
Nickel U 20.0 U 20.0 ug/L N/A
Potassium 10400 6670 ug/L 44.1 * (0%-20%)
Sodium 513000 172000 ug/L 99.6* (0%-20%)
Tin U 100 U 100 ug/L N/A 12120/12 15:3
Vanadium U 15.0 U 15.0 ug/L N/A 12120/12 11:5
Zinc U 10.0 U 10.0 ugIL N/A
QC1202789525 315987010 DUP
Calcium 412000 419000 ugIL 1.51 (0%-20%) 12120/12 12:4
Chromium U 25.0 U 25.0 ug/L N/A 12120/12 16:1·
Cobalt 469 480 ug/L 2.30 (0%-20%) 12120/12 12:4.
Iron 85.0 86.0 ug/L 1.18 1\ (+1-30.0)
Magnesium 1050000 1080000 ug/L 2.83 (0%-20%) 12120/12 16:1·
Manganese 43100 43800 ugIL 1.79 (0%-20%)
Molybdenum 133 137 ug/L 3.11 (0%-20%) 12120/12 12:4
Nickel 276 283 ugIL 2.56 (0%-20%)
Potassium 24200 25800 ug/L 6.20 (0%-20%) 12120/12 16:1·
Sodium 288000 294000 ug/L 1.96 (0%-20%) 12120/12 12:4
Tin U 100 U 100 ug/L N/A
Vanadium U 15.0 U 15.0 ug/L N/A 12120112 16: I·
Zinc 1220 1240 ug/L 2.29 (0%-20%) 12120/12 12:4
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 315987 Page 6 of 7
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Ran~e Anlst Date Time
\'Ietals Analysis-Mercury
3atch 1268494
QC1202792204 316168002 DUP
Mercury v 0.500 V 0.500 ug/L N/A BYV1 12/0711209:2
QC 1202792203 LCS
Mercury 2.00
QC 1202792202 MB
Mercury
QC1202792205 316168002 MS
Mercury 2.00
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
V
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
2.10 ug/L
V 0.500 ug/L
0.500 2.01 ug/L
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 1 0%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
Estimated Value
105 (85%-115%) 12/0711208 :5
12/0711208:5
100 (75%-125%) 12/0711209:2
A
B
BD
C
D
E
F
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H
K
L
M
M
N
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Matrix Related Failure
Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
NI A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
N1 See case narrative
ND Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
NJ Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
Q One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
R Sample results are rejected
V Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
V Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
VI Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 315987 Page 7 of 7
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst
VJ
UL
X
Y
/\
h
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
N/ A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
Date Time
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DVP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where. either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result. * Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Method/Analysis Information
Product:
Analytical Method:
Analytical Batch Number:
Sample ID
315987001
315987002
315987003
315987004
315987005
315987006
315987007
315987008
315987009
315987010
315987011
315987012
315987013
1202790185
1202790186
1202790187
1202790188
1202790189
Radiochemistry Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG315987
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
EPA 900.1 Modified
1267600
Client ID
MW-01 11272012
MW-02 11272012
MW-03 11282012
MW-03A 11292012
MW-05 11272012
MW-12 11272012
MW-14 11272012
MW-17 11282012
MW-18 11262012
MW-22 11262012
MW-24 11292012
MW-65 11272012
MW-70 11282012
Method Blank (MB)
315987001(MW-01._11272012) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
315987001(MW-Ol_11272012) Matrix Spike (MS)
315987001(MW-Ol_11272012) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-RAD-A-OI0 REV# 14.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information
All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information
Standard solutions for these analysis are NIST traceable or verified with a NIST traceable standard and used
before the expiration dates.
Sample Geometry
All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information
The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 315987001 (MW-01_11272012).
QC Information
All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Chemical Recoveries
All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMIOOI Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 315987 GEL Work Order: 315987
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Review/Validation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
Name: Kate Gellatly
Date: 07 FEB 2013 Title: Analyst I
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 315987
Parmname NOM
R.ad Gas Flow
3atch 1267600
QC1202790186 315987001 DUP
Gross Radium Alpha
Uncertainty
QC1202790189 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha 556
Uncertainty
QC1202790185 MB
Gross Radium Alpha
Uncertainty
QC1202790187 315987001 MS
Gross Radium Alpha 558
Uncertainty
QC1202790188 315987001 MSD
Gross Radium Alpha 558
Uncertainty
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
QC Summary
Sample Qual QC Units RPD%
1.52 1.51 pCilL 0.665
+/-0.350 +/-0.331
527 pCiIL
+/-5.88
U 0.0233 pCiIL
+/-0.112
1.52 478 pCilL
+/-0.350 +/-5.54
1.52 475 pCiIL 0.462
+/-0.350 +/-5.54
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
Estimated Value
Renort Date: February 7, 2013
Page lof 2
REC% Range Anlst
(0% -100%) KDF1
94.9 (75%-125%)
85.3 (75%-125%)
84.9 (0%-20%)
Date Time
12108/12 13:0
12/08/12 13:0
12/08/12 13:0
12108/12 12:5'
12/08/12 12:5'
A
B
BD
C
D
E
F
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid fcir reporting to regulatory agencies
H
K
L
M
M
N
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Matrix Related Failure
Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 315987 Page 2 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Ran~e Anlst
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
NI
ND
NJ
Q
R
U
U
UI
UJ
UL
X
Y
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
NI A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
Date Time
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +1-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
ri1@1 1 Laboratories LLC
a member of The GEL Group INC PO Box 30712 Charleston, SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407
P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178
January 29,2013
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: White Mesa Mill GW
Work Order: 316515
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on December 11,2012. This revised data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures. This data package was revised to review the metals data.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4505.
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Heather Shaffer
Project Manager
111111111 111 ' II 11II 11 11111111 11
www.gel.com
January 29, 2013
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 316515
Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on December 11,
2012 for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All
sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. GEL did not report Fe, Mn, Mo, or
Zn on sample ID 316515002(MW-37_12052012) ..
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following samples:
Case Narrative:
Laboratory ID
316515001
316515002
Client ID
MW-23 12052012
MW-37 12052012
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler
Receipt Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: Metals and
Radiochemistry.
Heather Shaffer
Proj ect Manager
Page: i of i GEL Laboratories, LLC
Project #: GEL Chain of Custody and Analytical Request 2040 Savage Road
GEL Quote#: Charleston, SC 29407
COC Number (I): GEL Work Order Number: 3i~5/5 Phone: [phone]
PO Number: Fax: [phone] )
Client Name: f. (\ E\~,\f.\.A~ ~ Phone #: L\'3S ~ 7 g .22.21 Sample Analysis Requested (5) (Fill in the number of containers for each test)
Project/Site Name:.' \ T \:t Fax #: '" H Should this r.. rI 5e.l"'l"jI<>.Jii1 v\0>. I..Jr:)·-""6W~ e.r 2 0 lZ Col <--Preservative Type (6) c: ~ ""2 sample be ''§
Address: ~y/S S H~y 191 1:,>b,(1,Lf14 considered: = <'J (..\'1 gY.5J1 c ..:>. ... .c
~ ......., '-..Ii ;&3 Comments c
Collected by: ~ ,... .woiiJC\'-'i Send Results To: &6-.rrl'" 'P"",}mer ~ r.. ~ <A()nCI Col ~ .i!: .. S Note: extra sample -is .c ,) ·Time .. :; E ,-1 4::: . .J1 required for sample -Date Collected > Ob ~ ./1
Sample ID Collected QC Code Field Sample '" ~ c: ~ ..tI\... specific QC .. -< -; ~ .jo::. (Military) m Fi Itered (J) Matrix (4) 0
(mm-dd-yy) :s u Q • For composites -indicate start and stop date/time (hhmm) ~ VJ ~ l-E-<
MvJ-j" j:J..Ot:.,:LOi:t. i 2/ 05/ '2.0 j''l '100 to V G-w ,.J ,., X X ---;;:..-, , \ .-
J\,\ ~ -37_ 12 () 5:1..0 l :t. 1?.!OS/::"6i'2. \SiO !V V &W rJ 'I -X X-I .--
TA T Requested: Nonnal: 'I." Rush: Specify: (Subject to Surcharge) IFax Results: Yes / ~ Circle Deliverable: C of A / QC Summary / Level 1 / Level 2 / Level 3 / Level 4
Remarks: Are there any known hazards applicable to these samples? If so, please list the hazards Samgle Collection Time Zone
Eastern Pacific
C~I Other
vMoU'ntaliY
Chain of Custody Signatures Sample Shipping and DeIiveryDetaiis
. Relinquished By (Signed) Date Time Received by (signed) Date Time -\ 1~1 I V. ~~ I~-II-I~ GEL PM:
1 ---) o.fl0..U"'..... H . . Jv'J'-"' 12/ (; /:2.01"2. liDO o91S Method of Shipment: Date Shipped:
"'--,
2 2 Airbill #:
3 3 Airbill #:
I.) Chain of Custody Number'" Client Dctetmined For Lab Receiving Use Only 2.} QC Codes: N '" Notmal Sample. TB '" Trip Blank, FD'" Field Duplicate, EB '" Equipment Blank. MS = Matrix Spike Sample. MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate Sample. G = Grab, C '" Composite
3.} Field Filtered: For liquid matrices. indicate with a • Y -for yes the sample was field filtered or -N • for sample was not tield tiltcred. Custody Sea/intact?
4.) Matrix Codes: DW=Drinking Water. GW=Groundwater. SW"'Surface Water, WW",Waste Water. W=Water. SO=Soil. SD"'Sedimenl. SL=Sludge. SS=Solid Waste. O=Oil. F=Filter. P=Wipe. U=Urine, F=Fecal. N=Nasal YES NO
5.) Sample Analysis Requested: Analytical method requested (i.e; 82608. 6010Bn470A) and number of containers provided for each (i.e. 8160B -3. 60JOBl7470A ·1). coolegemp:
6.) Preservative Type: HA = Hydrochloric Acid. I'll'" Nitric Acid. SH = Sodium Hydroxide. SA = Sulfuric Acid: AA = Ascorbic Acid, HX = Hexane, ST = Sodium Thiosulfate, Ifno preservative is added = leave field blank 4. " C
WHITE = LABORATORY YELLOW = FILE PINK = CLIENT
\ ~ .. \ l .. l2-
gth\),boratorieS LLC ~ if _
Client: ..l.) c.~' It. A ~ ,-I J.N M.I....
Received By: V, ~ ~1-
Suspected Hazard Information
COC/Samples marked as radioactive?
Classified Radioactive II or III by RSO?
COC/Samples marked containing PCBs?
Package, COC, and/or Samples marked as
beryllium or asbestos containing?
Shipped as a DOT Hazardous?
Samples identified as Foreign Soil?
Iple :eipt
1 Shipping containers received intact
and sealed?
2 Samples requiring cold preservation
within (0 ~ 6 deg. C)?*
2a Daily check performed and passed on
IR temperature gun?
3 Chain of custody documents included
with shipment?
4 Sample containers intact and sealed?
Samples requiring chemical 5 preservation at proper pH?
6 VOA vials free of heads pace (defined
as < 6mm bubble)?
7 Are Encore containers present?
8 Samples received within holding
time'?
9 Sample ID's on COC match ID's on
bottles?
10 Date & time on COC match date &
Itime on bottles?
11 Number of containers received match
number indicated on COC?
12 Are sample containers identifiable as
GEL provided?
13 COC form is properly signed in
relinquished/received sections?
14 Carrier and tracking number.
Comments (Use Continuation Form if needed):
X
X
X
X ,
X'
)(
X
~
SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
SDG/ARICOC/Work Qrder: ::) I {/)S l~
Date Received: ~\ )lJ)A .t ( , ao ( a
Q *IfNet Counts> IOOcpm on samples not marked "radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further
Z investigation. ....... -)( Maximum Net Counts Observed* (Observed Counts -Area Background Counts): ()~. J t-' .M.. x' rfyes, Were swipes taken of sample contatiners < action levels?
If yes, samples are to be segregeated as Safety Controlled Samples, and opened by the GEL Safety Group.
)( Hazard Class Shipped: UN#: x
Comnl1clllts/O .... lualifiers (Required l'lnn. r<. r>. .. .... 10 ~)
Circle Applicable:
Seals broken Darnall!, cSainer Leaking container Other (describe)
Preservation Method: Ice bags Blue ice Dry ice None Other (describe)
'*ail temper;tures are recorded in Celsius
Temperature Device Serial #:
Secondary Temperature Device Serial # (If Applicable): ~ ( S ~ If(;;, if ~
Circle Applicable:
Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Sample lO's, containers affected and observed pH:
IIf added. Lot#:
Sample lO's and containers affected:
lO's and tests affected:
Sample ID's and containers affected:
Sample lO's affected:
Sample lD's affected:
Circle Applicable:
FedEx Air FedEx Ground UPS Field Services Courier Other
'-~
6(Jl5 62 1);} 3'fOB~5c..
g/)15 580;; 8Lf07-/fc
\ \ ,
PM (or PMA) review: Initials --···--It--~~u,t-·---Date ~~ \-:) \)-Page~ . .--l
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Report Date: 29-JAN-1 3
Work Order: 316515
Page 1 of 3
GEL Work Order/SDG: 316515
Client SDG: 316515
Semi-annual
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
Heather Shaffer
DNMI00100 White Mesa Mill GW
DW16138
LEVEL3
EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample 10 Client Sample Desc.
316515001 MVV-23_12052012
316515002 MVV-37_12052012
Client Sample 10 Status T ests/Methods
-001 MW-23_12052012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVW EPA 245 Mercury
REVW 200.8/200.2 TAL
-002 MW-37_12052012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVW EPA 245 Mercury
REVW 200.8/200.2 TAL
Work Order Due Date: 02-JAN-13 Collector: C
Collect
Date & Time
Package Due Date:
EDD Due Date:
Due Date:
HXS1
Receive Time # of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
05-DEC-1214:00 11-DEC-12 09:00 0 2
3 05-DEC-1213:10 11-DEC-12 09:00 0
Product
Reference Fax Date PM Comments
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
use product group
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
use product group
30-DEC-12
02-JAN-13
02-JAN-13
Prelogin #: 20121298603
Project Workdef ID: 1294356
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
lab
Matrix
Fax Days to
Due Date Process CofC#
Prelog lab Field
Group QC QC
GROUND VVATER
GROUND VVATER
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
21
21
Aux Data
y
4,5
y
4,5
Receive
Codes
Product: MER245_L VVorkdeflD: 1308786 In Product Group? Yes Group Name: PROD_GROUP02 Group Reference: Full metals suite
Path: Standard Method: EPA 245.1/245.2
Product Description: EPA 245 Mercury
Samples: 001, 002
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7439-97-6 Mercury
Client RDl or
PQl & Unit
.5
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Product Reference: use product group
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 316515
Page 2 of 3
Product: ICPT AL20L WorkdeflD: 1308787 In Product Group? Yes Group Name: PROD_GROUP02 Group Reference: Full metals suite
Method: EPA 200.7 Path: Standard
Product Description: 200.7/200.2 TAL Product Reference: use product group
Samples: 001, 002 Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client RDL or Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
CAS # Parmname PQL & Unit Units Function in Sample? inQC? List?
7440-70-2 Calcium 500 ug/L REG Y Y Yes
7440-47-3 Chromium 25 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-48-4 Cobalt 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-89-6 Iron 30 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-95-4 Magnesium 500 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-96-5 Manganese 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-98-7 Molybdenum 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-02-0 Nickel 20 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-09-7 Potassium 500 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-23-5 Sodium 500 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-31-5 Tin 100 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-62-2 Vanadium 15 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-66-6 Zinc 10 ug/L REG Y Y
Product: MIMTAL20_L Workdef ID: 1308788 In Product Group? Yes Group Name: PROD _ GROUP02 Group Reference: Full metals suite
Method: EPA 200.8 Path: Standard
Product Description: 200.8/200.2 TAL Product Reference: use product group
Samples: 001 ,002 Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client RDL or Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
CAS # Parmname PQL & Unit Units Function in Sample? inQC? List?
7440-38-2 Arsenic 5 ug/L REG Y Y Yes
7440-41-7 Beryllium .5 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-43-9 Cadmium .5 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-50-8 Copper 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-92-1 Lead ug/L REG Y Y
7782-49-2 Selenium 5 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-22-4 Silver 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-28-0 Thallium .5 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-61-1 Uranium .3 ug/L REG Y Y
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Product: GFCTORAL Workdef 10: 1297250
Method: EPA 900.1 Modified
Product Description: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Samples: 001, 002
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
Gross Radium Alpha
In Product Group? No
Action Product Name Description
Contingent
Tests
Login Requirements:
Requirement
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
Samples
Reporting
Units
pCilL
Include? Comments
Peer Review by: ____________ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 316515
Page 3 of 3
Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
Sample Analysis
Sample ID
316515001
316515002
1202796247
1202800834
1202796248
1202800835
1202800838
1202796251
1202800836
1202796249
1202800837
1202796250
1202796259
1202804826
1202796260
1202804827
1202804832
1202796263
1202804831
1202796261
1202804833
1202796262
1202799643
1202799644
1202800195
1202800194
1202800196
Metals Fractional Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 316515
Client ID
MW-23 12052012
MW-37 12052012
Method Blank (MB) ICP
Method Blank (MB) ICP
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
316515001(MW-23_12052012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
316524001(Sunday lL) Serial Dilution (SD)
316515001(MW-23_12052012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
316524001(Sunday ID) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
316515001(MW-23_12052012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
316524001 (Sunday 1 S) Matrix Spike (MS)
Method Blank (MB) ICP-MS
Method Blank (MB) ICP-MS
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
315987011(MW-24_11272012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
316518004(MPL 04-1212-1 L) Serial Dilution (SD)
315987011(MW-24_11272012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
316518004(MPL 04-1212-1D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
315987011(MW-24_11272012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
316518004(MPL 04-1212-1S) Matrix Spike (MS)
Method Blank (MB) CV AA
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
316515001(MW-23_12052012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
316515001(MW-23_12052012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
316515001(MW-23_12052012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Method/Analysis Information
Analytical Batch:
Prep Batch:
Standard Operating
Procedures:
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
1269897, 1271399, 1269899, 1272960 and 1270929
1269896, 1271398, 1269898, 1272959 and 1270926
GL-MA-E-013 REV# 21, GL-MA-E-016 REV# 9, GL-MA-E-
014 REV# 24 and GL-MA-E-OI0 REV# 25
EPA 200.7, EPA 200.8 and EPA 245.11245.2
EPA 200.2 and EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
The SOP stated above has been prepared based on technical research and testing
conducted by GEL Laboratories, LLC. and with guidance from the regulatory documents
listed in this "Method/Analysis Information" section.
System Configuration
The Metals analysis-ICP was performed on a PE 7300 Optima radial/axial-viewing
inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer. The instrument is equipped
with a Burgener nebulizer, cyclonic spray chamber, and yttrium or scandium internal
standard. Operating conditions for the ICP are set at a power level of 1500 watts. The
instrument has a peristaltic pump flow rate of lAL/min, argon gas flows of 15 L/min and
0.2 L/min for the torch and auxiliary gases, and a flow setting ofO.65L/min for the
nebulizer.
The Metals analysis -ICPMS was performed on a Perkin Elmer ELAN 6100E
inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The instrument is equipped
with a cross-flow nebulizer, quadrupole mass spectrometer, and dual mode electron
multiplier detector. Internal standards of scandium, germanium, indium, tantalum, and/or
lutetium were utilized to cover the mass spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W
power and combined argon pressures of 3607 kPa for the plasma and auxiliary gases, and
0.85 L/min carrier gas flow, and an initial lens voltage of 5.2.
The Metals analysis -ICPMS was performed on a Perkin Elmer ELAN 9000 inductively
coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The instrument is equipped with a cross-
flow nebulizer, quadrupole mass spectrometer, and dual mode electron multiplier
detector. Internal standards of scandium, germanium, indium, tantalum, and/or lutetium
were utilized to cover the mass spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W power
and combined argon pressures of 3607 kPa for the plasma and auxiliary gases, and 0.85
L/min carrier gas flow, and an initial lens voltage of 5.2.
The Metals analysis-Mercury was performed on a Perkin-Elmer Flow Injection Mercury
System (FIMS-1 00) automated mercury analyzer. The instrument consists of a cold vapor
atomic absorption spectrometer set to detect mercury at a wavelength of 253.7 nm.
Sample introduction through the flow injection system is performed via a peristaltic
pump at 9 mL/min and nitrogen carrier gas rate of 80 mL/min.
Calibration Information
Instrument Calibration
All initial calibration requirements were met for this SDG.
CRDL Requirements
All CRDL standard(s) met the referenced advisory control limits.
ICSAlICSAB Statement
All interference check samples (ICSA and ICSAB) associated with this SDG met the
established acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Blank (CCB) Requirements
All continuing calibration blanks (CCB) bracketing this batch met the established
acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) Requirements
All continuing calibration verifications (CCV) bracketing this SDG met the acceptance
criteria.
Quality Control (QC) Information
Method Blank (MB) Statement
The MBs analyzed with this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Recovery
The LCS spike recoveries met the acceptance limits.
Quality Control (QC) Sample Statement
The following samples were selected as the quality control (QC) samples for this SDG:
316524001 (Sunday 1)-ICP, 316515001 (MW-23_12052012)-ICP and CVAA,
316518004 (MPL 04-1212-1) and 315987011 (MW-24_11272012)-ICP-MS.
Matrix Spike (MS) Recovery Statement
The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the MS analyses are evaluated when the
sample concentration is less than four times (4X) the spike concentration added. All
applicable elements met the acceptance criteria. The zinc recovery is showing 0%, as the
CRDL for zinc is greater than the concentration in the spike. The software sees the
concentration of spike as a non-detect so the recovery is returned as 0%.
Duplicate Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The RPD obtained from the designated sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated based on
acceptance criteria of 20% when the sample is >5X the contract required detection limit
(RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control
of RL is used to evaluate the DUP results. All applicable analytes met these requirements.
Serial Dilution % Difference Statement
The serial dilution is used to assess matrix suppression or enhancement. Raw element
concentrations that are 25X the IDL/MDL for CV AA, 50X the IDL/MDL for ICP, and
100X the IDL/MDL for ICP-MS analyses are applicable for serial dilution assessment.
All applicable analytes met the acceptance criteria of less than 10% difference (%D).
Technical Information
Holding Time Specifications
GEL assigns holding times based on the associated methodology, which assigns the date
and time from sample collection of sample receipt. Those holding times expressed in
hours are calculated in the AlphaLIMS system. Those holding times expressed as days
expire at midnight on the day of expiration. All samples in this SDG met the specified
holding time.
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
All procedures were performed as stated in the SOP.
Sample Dilutions
Dilutions are performed to minimize matrix interferences resulting from elevated mineral
element concentrations present in solid samples and/or to bring over range target analyte
concentrations into the linear calibration range of the instrument. Sample 316515002
(MW-37 _12052012) required a lOx dilution in order to bring sodium raw values within
the linear range of the instrument, and for potassium which sodium interferes with, in
order to ensure that the inter-element correction factors were valid. The dilution was also
required for the rest of the ICP metals in the sample due to the high levels of salts in the
matrix.
Preparation Information
The samples in this SDG were prepared exactly according to the cited SOP.
Miscellaneous Information
Electronic Packaging Comment
This data package was generated using an electronic data processing program referred to
as virtual packaging. In an effort to increase quality and efficiency, the laboratory has
developed systems to generate all data packages electronically. The following change
from traditional packages should be noted:
Analyst/peer reviewer initials and dates are not present on the electronic data files.
Presently, all initials and dates are present on the original raw data. These hard copies are
temporarily stored in the laboratory. An electronic signature page inserted after the case
narrative will include the data validator's signature and title. The signature page also
includes the data qualifiers used in the fractional package. Data that are not generated
electronically, such as hand written pages, will be scanned and inserted into the electronic
package.
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports (DERs) are generated to document procedural anomalies that may
deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER)
was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this SDG.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis
has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the
analytical case narrative.
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition,
all data designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation
upon completion of the data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case
narrative:
Reviewer: ~~ate:_2~lf-o"'St'~3 ______ _
\
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis Report
for
DNMIOOI Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 316515 GEL Work Order: 316515
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
N Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
U Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
The designation ND, if present, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above
the limit as defined in the 'U' qualifier above.
This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC
standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Heather Shaffer.
Reviewed by
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
>arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-23 12052012
Lab Sample ID: 316515001
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.1/245.2 Prep EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 245 .11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
AXS5
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 5,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
ClIent sno: jIb)!) Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
12117112 1650 1270926
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
>arameter
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-37 12052012
Lab Sample ID: 316515002
Qualifier Result
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 5, 2013
DNMIOOIOO
DNMIOOI
ClIent SUG: 3 I 65 I 5 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ------------------------------------------------The following Analytical Methods w_e_r_e~p_er_f_or_m_e_d ______________________________________________________________ __
Method Description Analyst Comments
1 EPA 245.1/245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.7
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
9 EPA 200.8
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC SummarI ReDort Date: February 5, 2013 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page lof 5
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 316515
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
\1etals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1269899
QC 1202796261 316518004 DUP
Arsenic U 5.00 U 5.00 ug/L NIA BAJ 12/18112 07 :5·
Beryllium U 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L NIA 12118112 15: 1
Cadmium U 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L NIA 1211811207:5·
Lead U 1.00 U 1.00 ug/L NIA
Selenium 6.39 U 5.00 ug/L 47.3 1\ (+1-5.00)
Thallium U 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L NIA
Uranium 2.67 2.76 ug/L 3.09 (0%-20%)
QC1202796260 LCS
Arsenic 50.0 49.5 ug/L 99 (85%-115%) 1211811206:5,
Beryllium 50.0 51.8 ug/L 104 (85%-115%) 12118112 14:4·
Cadmium 50.0 49.4 ug/L 98.9 (85%-115%) 12/18/12065
Lead 50.0 51.9 ug/L 104 (85%-115%)
Selenium 50.0 50.6 ug/L 101 (85%-115%)
Thallium 50.0 49.6 ug/L 99.1 (85%-115%)
Uranium 50.0 53.3 ug/L 107 (85%-115%)
QC1202796259 MB
Arsenic U 5.00 ug/L 1211811206:4'
Beryllium U 0.500 ug/L 12118112 14: 41
Cadmium U 0.500 ug/L 1211811206:4'
Lead U 1.00 ug/L
Selenium U 5.00 ug/L
Thallium U 0.500 ug/L
Uranium U 0.300 ug/L
QC1202796262 316518004 MS
Arsenic 50.0 U 5.00 52.5 ug/L 103 (75%-125%) 1211811208:0
Beryllium 50.0 U 0.500 50.2 ug/L (75%-125%) 12118112 15: 1 '
Cadmium 50.0 U 0.500 51.4 ug/L 103 (75%-125%) 12118/1208:0
Lead 50.0 U 1.00 53.3 ug/L 106 (75%-125%)
Selenium 50.0 6.39 54.5 ug/L 96.2 (75%-125%)
Thallium 50.0 U 0.500 51.7 ug/L 103 (75%-125%)
Uranium 50.0 2.67 56.5 ug/L 108 (75%-125%)
QC1202796263 316518004 SDILT
Arsenic U 8.50 U 8.50 ug/L NIA (0%-10%) 12/1811208:0
Beryllium U 1.00 U 1.00 ug/L NIA (0%-10%) 12118112 15:21
Cadmium U 0.550 U 0.550 ug/L NIA (0%-10%) 1211811208:0
Lead U 2.50 U 2.50 ug/L NIA (0%-10%)
Selenium 6.39 U 7.50 ug/L NIA (0%-10%)
Thallium U 2.25 U 2.25 ug/L NIA (0%-10%)
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 316515 Page 2 of 5
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Ran~e Anlst Date Time
\1etals Analysis -ICPMS_
3atch 1269899
Vranium 2.67 0.525 ug/L 1.8 (0%-10%)
3atch 1272960
QC1202804831 315987011 DUP
Copper V 10.0 V 10.0 ug/L N/A SKJ 01/04/13 13:3-
Silver V 10.0 V 10.0 ug/L N/A 01/03/1306:1
QC1202804827 LCS
Copper 50.0 53.6 ugIL 107 (85%-115%) 01/04113 11 :4'
Silver 50.0 51.8 ug/L 104 (85%-115%) 01/03/13 04:5
QC 1202804826 MB
Copper 'V -10.0 ug/L 01/04/13 11:4·
Silver V 10.0 ugIL 01/03/1304:4'
QC1202804833 315987011 MS
Copper 50.0 V 10.0 58.5 ug/L 101 (75%-125%) 01/04/13 13: 3-
Silver 50.0 V 10.0 47.0 ugIL 93 .9 (75%-125%) 01/03/13 06: 1
QC1202804832 315987011 SDILT
Copper V 10.0 3.02 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01/04/13 13:3'
Silver V 10.0 V 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01 /03/13 06:21
\1etals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1269897
QC1202796249 316524001 DUP
Calcium 3690 3750 ug/L 1.55 (0%-20%) LS 12/18/12 13:0
Chromium V 25.0 V 25.0 ug/L N/A
Cobalt V 10.0 V 10.0 ug/L N/A
Iron V 300 V 300 ug/L N/A
Magnesium U 1100 U 1100 ug/L N/A
Manganese U 20.0 U 20.0 ug/L N/A
Molybdenum 47.3 U 20.0 ug/L 87.4 /\ (+1-35.0)
Nickel U 20.0 U 20.0 ugIL N/A
Potassium 55700 54700 ug/L 1.86 (0%-20%) JWJ 12/18/12235
Sodium 871000 881000 ug/L 1.08 (0%-20%) LS 12/18/12 13:0
Tin U 100 U 100 ug/L N/A
Vanadium 951 971 ug/L 2.15 (0%-20%)
Zinc U 33.0 U 33.0 ug/L N/A
QC1202796248 LCS
Calcium 5000 5030 ug/L 101 (85%-115%) 12/18/12 12: 5
Chromium 500 501 ug/L 100 (85%-115%)
Cobalt 500 505 ug/L 101 (85%-115%)
Iron 5000 5090 ug/L 102 (85%-115%)
Magnesium 5000 5190 ug/L 104 (85%-115%)
Manganese 500 504 ug/L 101 (85%-115%)
Molybdenum 500 489 ug/L 97.8 (85%-115%)
Nickel 500 503 ug/L 101 (85%-115%)
Potassium 5000 5000 ug/L 100 (85%-115%) JWJ 12/18/1223:3
Sodium 5000 5090 ugiL 102 (85%-115%) LS 12/18/12 12:5
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summarl:
Workorder: 316515 Page 3 of 5
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
Vletals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1269897
Tin 500 499 ug/L 99.8 (85%-115%)
Vanadium 500 512 ug/L 102 (85%-115%) LS 12118112 12: 5
Zinc 500 495 ug/L 99 (85%-115%)
QCI202796247 MB
Calcium U 500 ug/L 12/18/12 12 :5
Chromium U 25.0 ug/L
Cobalt U 10.0 ug/L
Iron U 30.0 ug/L
Magnesium U 500 ug/L
Manganese U 10.0 ug/L
Molybdenum U 10.0 ug/L
Nickel U 20.0 ug/L
Potassium U 500 ug/L JWJ 12/1811223:3
Sodium U 500 ug/L LS 12/18112 12:5
Tin U 100 ug/L
Vanadium U 15.0 ug/L
Zinc U 10.0 ug/L
QC 1202796250 316524001 MS
Calcium 5000 3690 8370 ug/L 93.5 (75%-125%) 12118112 13: O·
Chromium 500 U 25.0 488 ug/L 96.8 (75%-125%)
Cobalt 500 U 10.0 491 ug/L 98.2 (75%-125%)
Iron 5000 U 300 4910 ug/L 96.6 (75%-125%)
Magnesium 5000 U 1100 5400 ug/L 96.7 (75%-125%)
Manganese 500 U 20.0 477 ug/L 95.3 (75%-125%)
Molybdenum 500 47.3 499 ug/L 90.3 (75%-125%)
Nickel 500 U 20.0 489 ug/L 97.7 (75%-125%)
Potassium 5000 55700 59900 ug/L N/A (75%-125%) JWJ 1211811223:5
Sodium 5000 871000 N 847000 ug/L N/A (75%-125%) LS 12118112 13: O·
Tin 500 U 100 491 ug/L 95.4 (75%-125%)
Vanadium 500 951 1440 ug/L 97.2 (75%-125%)
Zinc 500 U 33.0 530 ug/L 101 (75%-125%)
QC 120279625 1 316524001 SDILT
Calcium 369 77.6 ug/L 5.05 (0%-10%) 12118/12 13:0
Chromium U 50.0 U 50.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Cobalt U 50.0 U 50.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Iron U 1500 U 1500 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Magnesium U 5500 U 5500 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Manganese U 100 U 100 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Molybdenum 4.73 U 100 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Nickel U 75.0 U 75.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Potassium 5570 1200 ug/L 7.55 (0%-10%) JWJ 1211811223 :5,
Sodium 87100 17400 ug/L .07 (0%-10%) LS 12118112 13:0
Tin U 125 U 125 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 316515
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC%
Vletals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1269897
Vanadium
Zinc
Vletals Analysis-Mercury
3atch 1270929
QC1202800194 316515001
Mercury
QC1202799644 LCS
Mercury
QC1202799643 MB
Mercury
QC 1202800 196 316515001
Mercury
QC1202800195 316515001
Mercury
Notes:
DUP
2.00
MS
2.00
SDILT
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte isa surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
u
U
U
U
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
95.1
165 U
0.500 U
U
0.500
0.500 U
18.6
165
0.500
2.13
0.500
2.10
0.500
ug/L
ug/L
ugIL
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
2.21
N/A
N/A
N/A
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 1 0%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
Estimated Value
107
102
Page 4 of 5
Ran~e Anlst Date Time
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%) LS 12118/12 13:0
BYVI 12118112 13: 1
(85%-115%) 12118/12 13: 11
12118112 13:0
(75%-125%) 12/18112 13: 1
(0%-10%) 12/18112 13:1
A
B
BD
C
D
E
F
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H
K
L
M
M
N
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Matrix Related Failure
Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
NI A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl See case narrative
ND Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
NJ Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 316515 Page 5 of 5
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Ran2e Anlst
Q
R
U
U
UI
UJ
UL
X
Y
/\
h
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
Date Time
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Method/Analysis Information
Product:
Analytical Method:
Analytical Batch Number:
Sample ID
316515001
316515002
1202795777
1202795778
1202795779
1202795780
1202795781
Radiochemistry Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 316515
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
EPA 900.1 Modified
1269735
Client ID
MVV-23 12052012
MVV-37 12052012
Method Blank (MB)
316515001(MVV-23_12052012) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
316515001(MVV-23_12052012) Matrix Spike (MS)
316515001(MVV-23 _12052012) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Proced~re (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-RAD-A-OI0 REV# 14.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information
All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information
Standard solutions for these analysis are NIST traceable or verified with a NIST traceable standard and used
before the expiration dates.
Sample Geometry
All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Ouality Control (OC) Information:
Blank Information
The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 316515001 (MVV-23_12052012).
QC Information
All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Chemical Recoveries
All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMI001 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 316515 GEL Work Order: 316515
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
Review IValidation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition,all eLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: ~-:;J~~
Date: 17 DEC 2012
Name: Theresa Austin
Title: Group Leader
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 316515
Parmname NOM
Rad Gas Flow
Batch 1269735
QC1202795778 316515001 DUP
Gross Radium Alpha
Uncertainty
QC1202795781 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha 556
Uncertainty
QC1202795777 MB
Gross Radium Alpha
Uncertainty
QC 1202795779 316515001 MS
Gross Radium Alpha 558
Uncertainty
QC1202795780 316515001 MSD
Gross Radium Alpha 558
Uncertainty
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
QC Summar:y
Sample Qual QC Units RPD%
1.73 1.41 pCilL 20.2
+1-0 .394 +1-0.385
483 pCi/L
+1-6.11
U 1.00 pCiIL
+1-0.156
1.73 480 pCilL
+1-0.394 +1-6.32
1.73 487 pCi/L 1.47
+1-0.394 +1-6.22
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below theMDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
Estimated Value
ReDort Date: December 17, 2012
Page lof 2
REC% Ran~e Anlst
(0% -100%) KDFI
87 (75%-125%)
85.7 (75%-125%)
87 (0%-20%)
Date Ti
12115112 I
12115112 I
12115112 I
12115112 I
12115112 I
A
B
BD
C
D
E
F
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H
K
L
M
M
N
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported vah~e may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Matrix Related Failure
Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 316515 Page 2 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl
ND
NJ
Q
R
U
UI
UJ
UL
X
Y
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentr,ation, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
N/ A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
Date Ti
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater tha:
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
tC]@1 1 Laboratories LLC
a member of The GEL Group INC PO Box 30712 Charleston, SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407
P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178
January 29, 2013
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: White Mesa Mill GW
Work Order: 316780
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates th~ opportunitY to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on December 14,2012. This revised data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures. This data package was revised to review the metals data.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone] , ext. 4505.
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
Sincerely,
.~.""' .. lL~
Heather Shaffer
Project Manager
III r I [ II I11111 I1 111 I1111
'~'
www.gel.com
January 29, 2013
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 316780
Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on December 14,
2012 for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All
sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments
concerning sample receipt.
Sample Identification: The la~oratory received the following samples:
Case Narrative:
Laboratory ID
316780001
316780002
Client ID
~VV-19 12132012
~VV-20 12122012
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler
Receipt Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: ~etals and
Radiochemistry .
Heather Shaffer
Proj ect ~anager
Page: ___ _ of_+--__ ---I
Project #: I
GEL Quote #: ___________ 1
COCNumber(l):GEL Work Order Number:
PO Number:
GEL Chain of Custody and Analytical Re,uest
!
3t ~i}~6
GEL Laboratories, LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, SC 29407
Phone: {843} 556-8171
Fax: [phone]
Client Name: f.i'\~0\~ ~~\ ~ Phone #: Y3S b7g 2;2..2.j Sample AnalYSi~ Requested (5) (Fill in the number of containers for each test)
<..J~ Fax #: Should this Proiect/Site Name: <... . 2.0 iz.. sample be '.) .->e(V\IO-. . E H <--Preservative Type (6) .5 <
Address: b'-i:J..S S H~'-\ jq!
~
Collected by: '-1c ... r'\Y\e.{ H~l i;·(,lu..J. Send Results To: G-o...rr; 1\ P'\.lVV\er
~
SampleID
• For composites -indicate start and stop date/time
!v\w-}q_ 12J~2.0 "2
l!1 \\\-2D_12J 2.:10 i '2.
I
-Date Collected
(mm-dd-yy)
l2.J 13/ 20 \Z.
,2/ 12./2fJ \2
I -Time
Collected QC Code
I (Military) 0)
(hhmm)
ogoo N
i2iO .AJ
considered:
~JJ B ~ .2 « ~ u
" en ~ l-
I N
Field I Sampl
Filtered (31 Matrix (4)
t ~W \.f
!J V &W 1
~ c o 1:.1
'-o ... Q.I
.l:l
= = = -;
Q r-
~I 't 1'+-1 1
~Ijj-~I
I "
Comments
Note: extra sample 'is
required for sample
specific QC
TAT R~'luested: Normal: X Rush: Specify: _____ (Subject to Surcharge) lFax Results: Yes / -~~ Circle Deliverablb: C of A / QC Summary / Level I / Level 2 / Level 3 / Level 4
Remarks: Are there any known hazards applicable to these samples? If so, please list the hazards '----
Chain of Custody Signatures
Date . Relinquished By (Signed) Time Received by (signed) J.IoI£/~ )J/13/20 i:L 1100 P. tJlaml-1~~fC.
Date Time GEL PM:
f 2-' ,.~ Method of Shipment:
_.J
2 2 Airbill #:
3 3 Airbill #:
I.) Chain of Custody Number'" Client Determined i
2.) QC Codes: N = Normal Sample. TB = Trip Blank. FO" Field Duplicate. EB = Equipment Blank. MS = Matrix Spike Sample. MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate Sample. G = Grab. C = Composite
3,) Field Filtered: For liquid matrices. indicate with a -Y -lor yes the sample was field filtered or -N -lor sample was not field liltered.
Sample Collection Time Zone
Eastern Pacific
~ ~untain )
Other ___ _
Sample Shipping and Delivery Details
I Date Shipped:
For Lab Receiving Use Only
Custody Sea/Intact?
4.) Matrix Codes: DW=Drinking Water, GW=Groundwater, SW=Surface Water. WW=Waste Water, W=Water, SO=Soil. SD=Sediment. SL=Sludge, SS=Solid Waste. O"Oil. F=Filter, P"Wipe. U=Urine, F=Fecal. N=Nasal YES NO
5.) Sample Analysis Requested: Analytical method requested (i.e, 8260B. 60 1 OBn470A ) and number of containers provided for each (i.e. 8260B -3. 6010Bl7470A -1). .
6,) Preservative Type: HA = Hydrochloric Acid. NI" Nitric Acid, SH = Sodium Hydroxide, SA = Sulfuric Acid; AA = Ascorbic Acid, HX = Hexane, ST = Sodium Thiosulfate,lfno preservalire is added = leave field blank
Cooler Temp: l::r c
WHITE = LABORATORY YELLOW = FILE PINK = CLIENT
mD I Laboratories LLC
Client:
2
2a
3 Chain of custody documents included
with shipment?
4 Sample containers intact and sealed?
S Samples requiring chemical
preservation at proper pH?
6 VOA vials free of heads pace (defined
as < 6mm bubble)'!
7 Are Encore containers present?
8 Samples received within holding
time'?
9 Sample IO's on cac match IO's on
?
10 Date & time on COC match date &
time on bottles?
11 Number of containers received match
number indicated on COC?
12 Are sample containers identifiable as
GEL provided?
13 COC form is properly signed in
relinquished/received-sections?
14 Carrier and tracking number.
Comments (Use Continuation Form if needed):
SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
Co,mrnerltsl'Qllaliifiers (lIlPlt .. i'l".,tI for Non-Con
Seals broken Damaged container Leaking (describe)
Preservation Method: Ice bags Blue ice Dry ice ~ Other (describe)
*all temperatures are recorded in Celsius
Circle Applicable:
Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Sample lO's, containers affected and observed pH:
Sample lO's and containers affected:
(If yes, immediately deliver to Volatiles laboratory)
Sample lO's and containers affected:
Sample lO's affected:
Sample lO's affected:
Circle Applicable:
FedEx Ground UPS Field Services Courier Other --
YJ-f'f 01
PM (or PMA) review: Initials --......:'=1-----Date ---'-'~--'-.!......jf...C=:.....--p~ge_'_of
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 316780
Page 1 of 3
GEL Work Order/SDG: 316780
Client SDG: 316780
Semi-annual Work Order Due Date: 04-JAN-13 Collector: C
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
Heather Shaffer
DNMI00100 White Mesa Mill GW
DW16138
LEVEL3
EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
316780001 MVV-19_12132012
316780002 MVV-20_12122012
Client Sample ID Status T ests/Methods
-001 MVV-19_12132012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL
-002 MVV-20_12122012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL
Collect
Date & Time
Package Due Date:
EDD Due Date:
Due Date:
HXT1
Receive Time # of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
13-DEC-1208:00 14-DEC-12 09:05 0 2
2 12-DEC-1212:10 14-DEC-12 09:05 0
Product
Reference Fax Date PM Comments
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
use product group
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
use product group
02-JAN-13
04-JAN-13
04-JAN-13
Prelogin #: 20121298603
Project Workdef 10: 1294356
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
Lab
Matrix
Fax Days to
Due Date Process CofC#
Prelog Lab Field
Group QC QC
GROUND VVATER
GROUND VVATER
21
21
Aux Data
Cooler Seal Undisturbed Y
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
17
Y
17
Receive
Codes
Product: MER245_L VVorkdeflD: 1308786 In Product Group? Yes Group Name: PROD_GROUP02 Group Reference: Full metals suite
Path: Standard Method: EPA 245.1/245.2
Product Description: EPA 245 Mercury
Samples: 001, 002
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7439-97-6 Mercury
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
.5
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Product Reference: use product group
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? list?
REG Y Y Yes
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 316780
Page 2 of 3
Product: ICPTAL20L WorkdeflD: 1308787 In Product Group? Yes Group Name: PROD_GROUP02 Group Reference: Full metals suite
Method: EPA 200.7 Path: Standard
Product Description: 200.7/200.2 TAL Product Reference: use product group
Samples: 001, 002 Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly ClientRDlor Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
CAS # Parmname PQl & Unit Units Function in Sample? inQC? List?
7440-70-2 Calcium 500 ug/L REG Y Y Yes
7440-47-3 Chromium 25 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-48-4 Cobalt 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-89-6 Iron 30 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-95-4 Magnesium 500 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-96-5 Manganese 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-98-7 Molybdenum 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-02-0 Nickel 20 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-09-7 Potassium 500 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-23-5 Sodium 500 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-31-5 Tin 100 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-62-2 Vanadium 15 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-66-6 Zinc 10 ug/L REG Y Y
Product: MIMTAL20_L WorkdeflD: 1308788 In Product Group? Yes Group Name: PROD_GROUP02 Group Reference: Full metals suite
Method: EPA 200.8 Path: Standard
Product Description: 200.8/200.2 TAL Product Reference: use product group
Samples: 001, 002 Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client RDl or Reporting Parm Included Inclu~ed Custom
CAS # Parmname PQl & Unit Units Function in Sample? inQC? List?
7440-38-2 Arsenic 5 ug/L REG Y Y Yes
7440-41-7 Beryllium .5 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-43-9 Cadmium .5 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-50-8 Copper 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7439-92-1 Lead 1 ug/L REG Y Y
7782-49-2 Selenium 5 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-22-4 Silver 10 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-28-0 Thallium .5 ug/L REG Y Y
7440-61-1 Uranium .3 ug/L REG Y Y
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Product: GFCTORAL Workdef 10: 1297250
Method: EPA 900.1 Modified
Product Description: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Samples: 001,002
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
Gross Radium Alpha
In Product Group? No
Action Product Name Description
Contingent
Tests
login Requirements:
Requirement
Group Name:
Client RDl or
PQl & Unit
Samples
Reporting
Units
pCi/L
Include? Comments
Peer Review by: ____________ _ Work Order (SOG#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 316780
Page 3 of 3
Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
Sample Analysis
Sample ID
316780001
316780002
1202799267
1202799268
1202799274
1202801075
1202799275
1202799302
1202804826
1202799303
1202804827
1202804832
1202799309
1202804831
1202804833
1202799310
1202799311
1202799643
1202799644
1202800195
1202800194
1202800196
Metals Fractional Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 316780
Client ID
11VV-19 12132012
11VV-20 12122012
11ethod Blank (11B) ICP
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
316801009(12-80-2458L) Serial Dilution (SD)
316801009(12-80-2458D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
316801009(12-80-2458S) 11atrix Spike (11S)
11ethod Blank (11B) ICP-MS
11ethod Blank (11B) ICP-MS
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
315987011(11VV-24_11272012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
316801001(12-63-2450L) Serial Dilution (SD)
315987011(11VV-24_11272012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
315987011(11VV-24_11272012S) 11atrix Spike (11S)
316801001(12-63-2450S) 11atrix Spike (11S)
316801001(12-63-2450SD) 11atrix Spike Duplicate (11SD)
11ethod Blank (11B) CV AA
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
316515001(11VV-23_12052012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
316515001(11VV-23 _12052012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
316515001(11VV-23_12052012S) 11atrix Spike (11S)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Method/Analysis Information
Analytical Batch: 1270785, 1270806, 1272960 and 1270929
Prep Batch:
Standard Operating
Procedures:
Analytical Method:
Prep Method :
1270784, 1270805, 1272959 and 1270926
GL-MA-E-013 REV# 21, GL-MA-E-016 REV# 9, GL-MA-E-
014 REV# 24 and GL-MA-E-OI0 REV# 25
EPA 200.7, EPA 200.8 and EPA 245.11245.2
EPA 200.2 and EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
The SOP stated above has been prepared based on technical research and testing
conducted by GEL Laboratories, LLC. and with guidance from the regulatory documents
listed in this "Method/Analysis Information" section.
System Configuration
The Metals analysis-ICP was performed on aPE 7300 Optima radial/axial-viewing
inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer. The instrument is equipped
with a Burgener nebulizer, cyclonic spray chamber, and yttrium or scandium internal
standard. Operating conditions for the ICP are set at a power level of 1500 watts. The
instrument has a peristaltic pump flow rate of 1.4L/min, argon gas flows of 15 L/min and
0.2 L/min for the torch and auxiliary gases, and a flow setting ofO.65L/min for the
nebulizer.
The Metals analysis -ICPMS was performed on a Perkin Elmer ELAN 6100E
inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The instrument is equipped
with a cross-flow nebulizer, quadrupole mass spectrometer, and dual mode electron
multiplier detector. Internal standards of scandium, germanium, indium, tantalum, andlor
lutetium were utilized to cover the mass spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W
power and combined argon pressures of3607 kPa for the plasma and auxiliary gases, and
0.85 L/min carrier gas flow, and an initial lens voltage of 5.2.
The Metals analysis-Mercury was performed on a Perkin-Elmer Flow Injection Mercury
System (FIMS-l 00) automated mercury analyzer. The instrument consists of a cold vapor
atomic absorption spectrometer set to detect mercury at a wavelength of 253.7 nm.
Sample introduction through the flow injection system is performed via a peristaltic
pump at 9 mL/min and nitrogen carrier gas rate of 80 mL/min.
Calibration Information
Instrument Calibration
All initial calibration requirements have been met for this sample delivery group (SDG).
CRDL Requirements
All CRDL standards met the advisory control limits with the exceptions of: 316780001
(MW-19_12132012) and 316780002 (MW-20_12122012)-ICP. The PQL was outside of
the 70-130 range for zinc. 316780001 (MW-19_12132012) and 316780002 (MW-
20 _12122012)-ICP.
ICSAlICSAB Statement
All interference check samples (ICSA and ICSAB) associated with this SDG met the
established acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Blank (CCB) Requirements
All continuing calibration blanks (CCB) bracketing this batch met the established
acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) Requirements
All continuing calibration verifications (CCV) bracketing this SDG met the acceptance
criteria.
Quality Control (QC) Information
Method Blank (MB) Statement
The MBs analyzed with this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Recovery
The LCS spike recoveries met the acceptance limits.
Quality Control (QC) Sample Statement
The following samples were selected as the quality control (QC) samples for this SDG:
316801009 (12-80-2458)-ICP, 316801001 (12-63-2450),315987011 (MW-
24_11272012)-ICP-MS and 316515001 (MW-23_12052012)-CVAA.
Matrix Spike (MS) Recovery Statement
The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the MS analyses are evaluated when the
sample concentration is less than four times (4X) the spike concentration added. All
applicable elements met the acceptance criteria.
Duplicate Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The RPD obtained from the designated sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated based on
acceptance criteria of 20% when the sample is >5X the contract required detection limit
(RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control
of RL is used to e,;,aluate the DUP results. All applicable analytes met these requirements.
Serial Dilution % Difference Statement
The serial dilution is used to assess matrix suppression or enhancement. Raw element
concentrations that are 25X the IDL/MDL for CV AA, 50X the IDL/MDL for Iep, and
100X the IDL/MDL for ICP-MS analyses are applicable for serial dilution assessment.
All applicable analytes met the acceptance criteria of less than 10% difference (%D).
Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Recovery Statement
The percent recovery (%R) obtained from the MSD analyses are evaluated when the
sample concentration is less than four time (4 X) the spike concentration added. All
applicable elements met the acceptance criteria.
MS/MSD Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The RPD(s) between the MS and MSD met the acceptance limits.
Technical Information
Holding Time Specifications
GEL assigns holding times based on the associated methodology, which assigns the date
an~ time from sample collection of sample receipt. Those holding times expressed in
hours are calculated in the AlphaLIMS system. Those holding times expressed as days
expire at midnight on the day of expiration. All samples in this SDG met the specified
holding time.
Preparationl Analytical Method Verification
All procedures were performed as stated in the SOP.
Sample Dilutions
Dilutions are performed to minimize matrix interferences resulting from elevated mineral
element concentrations present in solid samples and/or to bring over range target analyte
concentrations into the linear calibration range of the instruments. Samples 316780001
(MW-19 _12132012) and 316780002 (MW-20_12122012) required 5x and lOx dilutions
in order to bring sodium raw values within the linear range of the instrument, and for
potassium that sodium interferes with, in order to ensure that the inter-element correction
factors were valid. The sample also required dilutions in order to minimize tin
suppression due to matrix interferences.
Preparation Information
The samples in this SDG were prepared exactly according to the cited SOP.
Miscellaneous Information
Electronic Packaging Comment
This data package was generated using an electronic data processing program referred to
as virtual packaging. In an effort to increase quality and efficiency, the laboratory has
developed systems to generate all data packages electronically. The following change
from traditional packages should be noted:
Analyst/peer reviewer initials and dates are not present on the electronic data files.
Presently, all initials and dates are present on the original raw data. These hard copies are
temporarily stored in the laboratory. An electronic signature page inserted after the case·
narrative will include the data validator's signature and title. The signature page also
includes the data qualifiers used in the fractional package. Data that are not generated
electronically, such as hand written pages, will be scanned and inserted into the electronic
package.
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports (DERs) are generated to document procedural anomalies that may
deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER)
was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this SDG.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis
has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the
analytical case narrative.
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition,
all data designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation
upon completion of the data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case
narrative:
Reviewer:
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis Report
for
DNMIOOI Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 316780 GEL Work Order: 316780
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
* * Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
U Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
The designation ND, if present, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above
the limit as defined in the 'U' qualifier above.
This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC
standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Heather Shaffer.
Reviewed by
>arameter
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-19 12132012
Lab Sample ID: 316780001
Qualifier Result
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 5,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
Chent SUG: jlb/~U Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
2
4
5
6
EPA 245 .11245.2
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
larameter
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-20 12122012
Lab Sample ID: 316780002
Qualifier Result
Report Date: February 5,2013
Proiect: DNMIOOI00
Client ID: DNMIOOI
ClIent SUU: 3 16780 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method -----------------------------------------------------------------
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Comments
1 EPA 245.11245.2"
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.8
5 EPA 200.8
6 EPA 200.8
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary ReDort Date: February 5, 2013 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page lof 5 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 60Q
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 316780
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
\1etals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1270806
QC1202799303 LCS
Arsenic 50.0 50.6 ug/L 101 (85%-115%) SKJ 1211811200:5
Beryllium 50.0 51.8 ug/L 104 (85%-115%)
Cadmium 50.0 50.9 ug/L 102 (85%-115%)
Copper 50.0 50.9 ug/L 102 (85%-115%)
Lead 50.0 51.4 ug/L 103 (85%-115%)
Selenium 50.0 51.1 ug/L 102 (85%-115%)
Thallium 50.0 50.2 ug/L 100 (85%-115%)
Uranium 50.0 53.7 ug/L 107 (80%-120%)
QC1202799302 MB
Arsenic U 5.00 ug/L 12/18112 00: 5
Beryllium U 0.500 ug/L
Cadmium U 0.500 ug/L
Copper U 10.0 ug/L
Lead U 1.00 ug/L
Selenium U 5.00 ug/L
Thallium U 0.500 ug/L
Uranium U 0.300 ug/L
QC 120279931 0 316801001 MS
Arsenic 50.0 U 5.00 54.0 ug/L 107 (75%-125%) 12118/1202:3'
Beryllium 50.0 U 0.500 50.3 ug/L 101 (75%-125%)
Cadmium 50.0 U 0.500 52.7 ug/L 105 (75%-125%)
Copper 50.0 U 10.0 49.3 ug/L 96.9 (75%-125%)
Lead 50.0 U 1.00 53.3 ug/L 106 (75%-125%)
Selenium 50.0 U 5.00 53.3 ug/L 107 (75%-125%)
Thallium 50.0 U 0.500 51.1 ug/L 102 (75%-125%)
Uranium 50.0 11.7 66.7 ug/L 110 (75%-125%)
QC1202799311 316801001 MSD
Arsenic 50.0 U 5.00 52.5 ug/L 2.66 104 (0%-20%) 1211811202:4
Beryllium 50.0 U 0.500 50.1 ug/L 0.418 100 (0%-20%)
Cadmium 50.0 U 0.500 50.7 ug/L 3.74 101 (0%-20%)
Copper 50.0 U 10.0 48.1 ug/L 2.49 94.5 (0%-20%)
Lead 50.0 U 1.00 52.2 ug/L 1.98 104 (0%-20%)
Selenium 50.0 U 5.00 51.2 ug/L 4.03 102 (0%-20%)
Thallium 50.0 U 0.500 50.8 ug/L 0.697 101 (0%-20%)
Uranium 50.0 11.7 65.1 ug/L 2.50 107 (0%-20%)
QC1202799309 316801001 SDILT
Arsenic U 8.50 U 8.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 12118/1202:51
Beryllium U 1.00 U 1.00 ug/L N/A (0%""10%)
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar:y
Workorder: 316780 Page 2 of 5
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
\1etals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1270806
Cadmium U 0.550 U 0.550 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Copper U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) SKJ 12118/1202:51
Lead U 2.50 U 2.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Selenium U 7.50 U 7.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Thallium U 2.25 U 2.25 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Uranium 11.7 2.37 ug/L 1.2 (0%-10%)
3atch 1272960
QC1202804831 315987011 DUP
Copper U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A SKJ 01104113 13: 3-
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A 0110311306:1.
QC1202804827 LCS
Copper 50.0 53.6 ugIL 107 (85%-115%) 01104/13 11:4'
Silver 50.0 51.8 ug/L 104 (85%-115%) 0110311304:5
QC1202804826 MB
Copper U 10.0 ug/L 01104113 11:4,
Silver U 10.0 ug/L 01103/13 04 :4'
QC1202804833 315987011 MS
Copper 50.0 U 10.0 58.5 ug/L 101 (75%-125%) 01104/13 13:3-
Silver 50.0 U 10.0 47.0 ug/L 93.9 (75%-125%) 0110311306:1
QC1202804832 315987011 SDILT
Copper U 10.0 3.02 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01104/13 13:3'
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ugiL N/A (0%-10%) 01 /03/13 06:21
\1etals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1270785
QC1202801075 316801009 DUP
Calcium 1050 964 ug/L 8.37 /\ (+1-200) LS 12118112 16:3-
Chromium U 25.0 U 25.0 ug/L N/A
Cobalt U 10.0 U 10.0 ugIL N/A
Iron 115 105 ug/L 8.75 /\ (+1-100)
Magnesium U 500 U 500 ug/L N/A
Manganese 12.7 11.7 ug/L 7.87 /\ (+1-10.0)
Molybdenum U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A
Nickel U 20.0 U 20.0 ug/L N/A
Potassium 1390 1240 ugIL 11.1 (0%-20%) JWJ 1211911200:5
Sodium 579 437 ug/L 28.0 /\ (+1-300)
Tin U 100 U 100 ug/L N/A LS 12118112 16:3-
Vanadium U 15.0 U 15.0 ug/L N/A
Zinc 240 222 ug/L 7.59 (0%-20%)
QC1202799268 LCS
Calcium 5000 4950 ug/L 99 (85%-115%) 12118/12 15:5
Chromium 500 497 ug/L 99.4 (85%-115%)
Cobalt 500 500 ugiL 99.9 (85%-115%)
Iron 5000 4970 ug/L 99.5 (85%-115%)
Magnesium 5000 5090 ug/L 102 (85%-115%)
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 316780 Page 3 of 5
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
V1etals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1270785
Manganese 500 499 ug/L 99.8 (85%-115%)
Molybdenum 500 488 ug/L 97.5 (85%-115%) LS 12118112 15: 5
Nickel 500 502 ug/L 100 (85%-115%)
Potassium 5000 4960 ug/L 99.1 (85%-115%) JWJ 12/1911200:4·
Sodium 5000 4920 ug/L 98.4 (85%-115%)
Tin 500 501 ug/L 100 (85%-115%) LS 12118112 15:5
Vanadium 500 506 ug/L 101 (85%-115%)
Zinc 500 491 ug/L 98.2 (85%-115%)
QC1202799267 MB
Calcium U 500 ugIL 12118112 15:5
Chromium U 25.0 ug/L
Cobalt U 10.0 ug/L
Iron U 30.0 ug/L
Magnesium U 500 ug/L
Manganese U 10.0 ug/L
Molybdenum U 10.0 ug/L
Nickel U 20.0 ug/L
Potassium U 500 ug/L JWJ 1211911200:4
Sodium U 500 ug/L
Tin U 100 ug/L LS 12118/12 15:5
Vanadium U 15.0 ug/L
Zinc U 10.0 ug/L
QC1202799275 316801009 MS
Calcium 5000 1050 5860 ug/L 96.2 (75%-125%) 12118112 16:3
Chromium 500 U 25.0 495 ug/L 98.8 (75%-125%)
Cobalt 500 U 10.0 495 ug/L 98.7 (75%-125%)
Iron 5000 115 4980 ug/L 97.2 (75%-125%)
Magnesium 5000 U 500 5190 ug/L 101 (75%-125%)
Manganese 500 12.7 505 ug/L 98.5 (75%-125%)
Molybdenum 500 U 10.0 487 ug/L 97.4 (75%-125%)
Nickel 500 U 20.0 494 ug/L 98.8 (75%-125%)
Potassium 5000 1390 6280 ug/L 97.8 (75%-125%) JWJ 12119112005
Sodium 5000 579 5450 ug/L 97.5 (75%-125%)
Tin 500 U 100 490 ug/L 98 (75%-125%) LS 1211 8112 16: 3
Vanadium 500 U 15.0 508 ug/L 102 (75%-125%)
Zinc 500 240 704 ug/L 92.8 (75%-125%)
QC1202799274 31680lO09 SDILT
Calcium 1050 202 ug/L 3.79 (0%-10%) 12118112 16:3
Chromium U 25.0 U 25.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Cobalt U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Iron 115 U 150 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Magnesium U 550 U 550 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Manganese 12.7 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 316780
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC%
Vletals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1270785
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Sodium
Tin
Vanadium
Zinc
Vletals Analysis-Mercury
3atch 1270929
QC1202800194 316515001
Mercury
QC1202799644 LCS
Mercury
QC1202799643 MB
Mercury
QC1202800196 316515001
Mercury
QC1202800195 316515001
Mercury
Notes:
DUP
2.00
MS
2.00
SDILT
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
u
u
u
u
U
U
U
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A
20.0 U 20.0 ug/L N/A
1390 212 ug/L 23.8
579 U 500 ugIL N/A
100 U 100 ug/L N/A
15.0 U 15.0 ug/L N/A
240 48.0 ug/L .0167
0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A
2.13 ugIL
U 0.500 ug/L
0.500 2.10 ug/L
0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GCIMS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 1 0%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
Estimated Value
107
102
Page 4 of 5
Range Anlst Date Time
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%) LS 12118112 16:3
(0%-10%) JWJ 1211911201:0
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%) LS 12118112 16: 3
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
BYV1 12118112 13: 1.
(85%-115%) 12118112 13: 11
12118112 13:0
(75%-125%) 12118112 13: 1
(0%-10%) 12118112 13: 1
A
B
BD
C
D
E
F
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H
K
L
M
M
N
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Matrix Related Failure
Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 316780 Page 5 of 5
Range Anlst Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC%
N/ A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl
ND
NJ
Q
R
U
U
UI
UJ
UL
X
Y
/\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
N/ A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
Date Time
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Method/Analysis Information
Product:
Analytical Method:
Analytical Batch Number:
Sample ID
316780001
316780002
1202799798
1202799799
1202799800
1202799801
1202799802
Radiochemistry Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG316780
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
EPA 900.1 Modified
1270972
Client ID
MW-19 12132012
MW-20 12122012
Method Blank (MB)
316780001(MW-19 _12132012) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
316780001(MW-19 _12132012) Matrix Spike (MS)
316780001(MW-19_12132012) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-RAD-A-010 REV# 14. '
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information
All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information
Standard solutions for these analysis are NIST traceable or verified with a NIST traceable standard and used
before the expiration dates.
Sample Geometry
All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Ouality Control (OC) Information:
Blank Information
The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 316780001 (MW-19_12132012).
QC Information
All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time ·
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Chemical Recoveries
All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
The matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate, 1202799800 (MW-19 _12132012) and 1202799801
(MW -19 _12132012), aliquots were reduced to conserve sample volume.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMIOOI Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 316780 GEL Work Order: 316780
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
* * Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
Review/Validation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: .:;J/~ ~
Date: 21 DEC 2012
Name: Theresa Austin
Title: Group Leader
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 316780
Parmname NOM
Rad Gas Flow
Batch 1270972
QC 1202799799 316780001 DUP
Gross Radium Alpha
Uncertainty
QC1202799802 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha 556
Uncertainty
QC 1202799798 MB
Gross Radium Alpha
Uncertainty
QC1202799800 316780001 MS
Gross Radium Alpha 1110
Uncertainty
QC1202799801 316780001 MSD
Gross Radium Alpha 1110
Uncertainty
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported . Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
QC SummarI
Sample Qual QC Units RPD%
4.86 4.84 pCilL 0.496
+/-0.670 +/-0.681
488 pCi/L
+/-6.50
U 1.00 pCilL
+/-0.306
4.86 995 pCilL
+/-0.670 +/-13.2
4.86 1020 pCilL 2.27
+/-0.670 +/-13.1
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
Estimated Value
Reoort Date: December 20, 2012
Page lof 2
REC% 'Range Anlst
(0% -20%) KDFI
87.9 (75%-125%)
88.9 (75%-125%)
91 (0%-20%)
Date Ti
12/19/12 (
12/19/12 (
12/19/12 (
12/19/12 (
12/19/12 (
A
B
BD
C
D
E
F
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H
K
L
M
M
N
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Matrix Related Failure
Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 316780 Page 2 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Ran~e Anlst
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl
ND
NJ
Q
R
U
UI
UJ
UL
X
Y
/\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
N/ A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
Date Ti
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater tha
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
["#1-Laboratories LLC
a member of The GEL Group INC PO Box 30712 Charleston, SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407
P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178
January 29,2013
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: White Mesa Mill GW
Work Order: 315400
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the .
sample(s) we received on November 16,2012. This revised data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures. This data package was revised to review the metals data.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone] , ext. 4505.
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
UIIIII II
Sincerely,
Heather Shaffer
Project Manager
www.gel.com
January 29, 2013
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 315400
Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on November 16,
2012 for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All
sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. GEL did not report the following
analytes on the following samples: 315400003(MW-25 _11122012) (Sn), 315400005(MW-27 _11132012), (Sn),
315400006(MW-28_11142012) (Sn, Zn, Mo), 315400008(MW-30_11132012) (Sn), and
315400009(MW-35_11l32012) (Zn, Sn) ..
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following samples:
Laboratory ID Client ID
315400001 MW-11 11122012
315400002 MW-15 11142012
315400003 MW-25 11122012
315400004 MW-26 11152012
315400005 MW-27 11132012
315400006 MW-28 11142012
315400007 MW-29 11142012
315400008 MW-30 11132012
315400009 MW-35 11132012
315400010 MW-36 11142012
Case Narrative:
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler Receipt
Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: Metals and Radiochemistry.
Heather Shaffer
Proj ect Manager
Page: i of I GEI,. Laboratories, LLC
Project #: GEL Chain of Custody and Analytical Request 2040 Savage Road
GEL Quote#: Charleston, SC 29407
COC Number (I): GEL Work Order Number: 5t5ibD Phone: [phone]
PO Number: Fax: [phone]
Client Name: Ef'\e.. ... 9\:,~ 't=:",e..\~ Phone #: L,,?>S b 7 g 2..221 Sample Analysis Requested (5) (Fill in the number of containers for each test) ---III Project/Site Name: S>' \ GcoW\d. w c-ter Fax #: Should this J.. ~ ~-:JJ)l2.. ~ <--Preservative Type (6) eiV\ 1 o..r\o v..'" = ~ ~ sample be ";
Address: ~42.S S Mu}~ \'1 I ' 1,'" & \"X\ g ,-\5'\ \ considered: == '3 e;\ G\.n . ~-n ~ 0 CJ <:> ~'l ... ;/\ Comments
Collected by: ~"V\1\ e.f" "~Y\~l~~ Send Results To: G-.Arr;1\ 'R""t"1er
0 ~~ ~ J.. d2 Note: extra sample 1S ~ .t:J <C -. S ·Time '; ~ required for sample • Date Collected ~ = 1~ Sample ID Collected QC Code Field Sample ex c ~pecific QC (Military) (]) Filtered (J} Matrix {~} < C; ,.~ ~o:
• For composites -indicate start and stop date/time (mm-dd-yy) U -= (hhmm) ~ t-~ ...;,
l"fW-ii-t\\2'2..0t2 1\h2l20~2 1330 '" J c;.W I ''A 'f. ~
fv~~-\S-) t \4 2CirJ... 1'\/14/~r2. 12:~S N V &'W 1 'f y.. \
M w-.2.5_) 112.:to \'l. \Vi2ll2.. )'30$ N .J &-vJ 1 )( 'f. 1
MW 2.~-H\S20tl .. \l/l~/):t 0730 rJ y &vJ ~ "f. "" kf" ~,
1 Hll"'"
M~\l-2.7_ ")) J320i2 n/i3/}2.. )30S tV ...; &'vJ 1 'f.. ~ . ,~ ,
T \ ~"Al' ~1"'V"f,o"
MW-2Z_ \ \ 1~2.0\'2 H/14/)2,. HDO _N Y (;;W t '1.. ~ I , .J tJ\ w -2..'-\ _ ,., '42. (} \:l )\/li.\/tl '350 rJ i &W 1 X 'f..
MW-30_ il13'2..cn2. H/j~/12. r\\.\() rJ V &W \ -~ 'f \
M vJ -35_11 1:32.0 \:2. \\/J3/i~ 1315 N V &vJ I Y '" i
}J\W-3b_) 1l42..0i2 H/1'-\ / 12.. 0900 rJ Y (jw I 'i i-i
TAT Requested: Nonnal: /' Rush: Specify: (Subject to Surcharge) IFax Results: Yes / 61;) Circle Deliverable: C of A / QC Summary / Level 1 / Level 2 / Level 3 / Level 4
Remarks: Are there any known hazards applicable to these samples? If so, please list the hazards Sam(2le Collection Time Zone
'J:~ cAr1~ Q.v.es\lOOS ~bD~" \.,("-+h~ Eastern Pacific
~DL uH VJe;neJ ~l Other
VMountafTi)
Chain of Custody Signatures Sample Shipping and Delivery Details
, Relinquished By (Signed) Date Time Received by (signed) Date Time
~ t£)Q;¥Lt
GEL PM:
1..:J~~ fI.,,~ .,. '1 -,
H/lS/2t>\2 II-J~-J ~ . D I k HOO 1 I '. 'i ~ Method of Shipment: Date Shipped:
2 2 Airbill #:
3 3 Airbill #:
I.) Chain of Custody Number = Client Determined For Lab Receiving Use Only
2.) QC Codes: N = Normal Sample. TB = Trip Blank, FD = Field Duplicate, EB = Equipment Blank. MS = Matrix Spike Sample, MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate Sample, G = Grab, C = Composite
3.) Field Filtered: For liquid matrices, indicate with a -Y -tor yes the sample was field filtered or • N • for sample was nOI field filtered. Custody Seal intact?
4.) Matrix Codes: DW;:Drinking Water, GW=Groundwater. SW=Surface Water. WW=Waste Water. W=Water. SO=Soil. SD=Sediment. SL=Sludge. SS=Solid Waste. O=Oil. F=Filter. P"'Wipe. U=Urine, F=Fecal. N=Nasal YES NO
5.) Sample Analysis Requested: Analytical method requested (i.e. 8260B, 6010Bl7470A) and number of containers provided for each (i.e. 82608 ·3, 60JOBl7470A • I). Coo~Tem~:
6,) Preservative Type: HA = Hydrochloric Acid. Nt = Nilric Acid. SH = Sodium Hydroxide, SA = Sui furic Acid: AA = Ascorbic Acid. HX = Hexane. ST = Sodium Thiosulfate. If no preservative is added = leave field blank
WHITE = LABORATORY YELLOW = FILE PINK = CLIENT
mI Laboratories LLC
Client: D N M 'C
Suspected Hazard Information
C~c/Samples marked as radioactive?
Classified Radioactive II or m by RSO?
COC/Samples marked containing PCBs?
Package, COC, andlor Samples marked as
beryllium or asbestos containing?
Shipped as a DOT Hazardous?
Samples identified as Foreign Soil?
Sample Receipt Criteria
1 Shipping containers received intact
and sealed?
2 Samples requiring cold preservation
within (0 < 6 deg. C)?*
2a Daily check perfonned and passed on
IR temperature gun?
Chain of custody documents included
3 Iwith shipment?
4 Sample containers intact and sealed?
5 Samples requiring chemical
1P1~"""1 va~~vu at proper pH?
VOA vials free of headspace (defined 6 as < 6mrn bubble)?
7 Are Encore containers present?
x
8 Samples received within holding
time? X.
9 Sample ID's on COC match ID's on
.1 .0 . 'V
UUlUC:;: /\
IDate & time on CDC match date &
10 time on bottles? X
SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
SDG/ARlCOClWor~ Order: ~ I :] -Zf VO
Date Received: N ON. / C:>, cfI () 161
~ *IfNet Counts> lOOcpm on samples not marked "radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further
Z investigation,
)( Maximum Net Counts Observed* (Observed Counts -Area Background Counts):
X If yes, Were swipes taken of sample contatiners < action levels?
,
X. If yes, samples are to be segregeated as Safety Controlled Samples, and opened by the GEL Safety Group,
X Hazard Class Shipped: UN#:
x
Comments/Qualifiers (Required for Non.Conforming Items)
Circle Applicable:
Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container ;J Other (describe)
l!J (':..-
Preservation Method: Ice bags Blue ice Dry ice .~ Other (describe)
*all temperatures are recorded in Celsius
1. Device Serial #:
~""""~~J Temperature Device Serial # (If Applicable): 6 I 5;} f& 1.( ~
Circle Applicable:
Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Sample ID's, containers affected and observed pH:
,,,... added. 11'11#:
Sample ID's and containers affected:
(If yes, immediately deliver to Volatiles laboratory)
ID's and tests affected:
Sample ID's and containers affected:
Sample ID's affected:
Number of containers received match 'Sample ID's affected:
11 number indicated on CaC?
12 Are sample contai~ers identifiable as AI n I-
GEL provided?XC~li ;[ /t.J. . S --~~~--~----------------------------------------------------~ cac fonn is properly signed in
13 .1: • II ,'" sections? \I . .."'''' .... "'~ . )\ ;
Circle Applicable:
FedEx Air FedEx Ground UPS Field Services
14 Carrier and tracking number.
Conunents (Use Continuation Form if needed):
PM (or PMA) review: Initials --r:..P .. {):.s.' ______ Date \l ~ \ ~ -l1 Page -l--of --L-
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
GEL Work Order/SDG: 315400
Client SDG: 315400
Semi-annual
Project Manager: Heather Shaffer
Project Name: DNMI00100 White Mesa Mill GW
DW16138 Purchase Order:
Package Level: LEVEL3
EDD Format: EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
315400001 MW-11_11122012
315400002 MW-15_11142012
315400003 MW-25_11122012
315400004 MW-26_11152012
315400005 MW-27 _11132012
315400006 MW-28_11142012
315400007 MW-29_11142012
315400008 MW-30_11132012
315400009 MW-35_11132012
315400010 MW-36_11142012
Client Sample ID Status T ests/Methods
-001 MVV-11_11122012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL
-002 MVV-15_11142012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL
-003 MVV-25_11122012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury
REVVV . 200.8/200.2 TAL
-004 MVV-26_11152012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury
Collect
Date & Time
12-NOV-1213:00
14-NOV-1212:35
12-NOV-1213:08
15-NOV-12 07:30
13-NOV-12 13:05
14-NOV-12 11 :00
14-NOV-1213:50
13-NOV-12 11 :40
13-NOV-1213:45
14-NOV-12 09:00
Product
Reference
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
use product group
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
use product group
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
use product group
Gross Alpha
use product group
use product group
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 315400
Page 1 of 4
Work Order Due Date: 07-DEC-12 Collector: C
Package Due Date:
EDD Due Date:
Due Date:
HXS1
Receive Time # of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
16-NOV-1210:45 0
16-NOV-1210:45 0
16-NOV-1210:45 0 2
16-NOV-12 10:45 0
16-NOV-1210:45 0 2
16-NOV-1210:45 0 2
16-NOV-1210:45 0
16-NOV-1210:04 0 2
16-NOV-1210:45 0 2
16-NOV-12 10:45 0
Fax Date PM Comments
05-DEC-12
07-DEC-12
07-DEC-12
Prelogin #: 20121197931
Project Workdef 10: 1294356
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
Lab Fax Days to Prelog Lab Field
Matrix Due Date Process
GROUND WATER 21
GROUND WATER 21
GROUND WATER 21
GROUND WATER 21
GROUND WATER 21
GROUND WATER 21
GROUND WATER 21
GROUND WATER 21
GROUND WATER 21
GROUND WATER 21
Aux Data
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
y
8
y
8
y
8
y
8
CofC# Group QC QC
Receive
Codes
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
-005 MVV-27_11132012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
-006 MVV-28_11142012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
-007 MVV-29_11142012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
"' -008 MVV-30_11132012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
-009 MVV-35_11132012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
-010 MVV-36_11142012 REVVV GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Gross Alpha
Liquid
REVVV 200.7/200.2 TAL use product group
REVVV EPA 245 Mercury use product group
REVVV 200.8/200.2 TAL use product group
Product: MER245_L Workdef ID: 1308786 In Product Group? Yes
Method: EPA 245.1/245.2
Product Description: EPA 245 Mercury
Samples: 001,002,003,004,005,006,007,008,009,010
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7439-97-6 Mercury
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
y
8
y
8
y
8
y
8
y
8
y
8
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 315400
Page 2 of 4
Group Name: PROD_GROUP02 Group Reference: Full metals suite
Path: Standard
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
.5
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Product Reference: use product group
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Product: ICPTAL20L VVorkdeflD: 1308787 In Product Group? Yes Group Name: PROD_GROUP02
Method: EPA 200.7
Product Description: 200.7/200.2 TAL
Samples: 001,002,003,004,005,006,007,008,009,010
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS #
7440-70-2
7440-47-3
7440-48-4
7439-89-6
7439-95-4
7439-96-5
7439-98-7
7440-02-0
7440-09-7
7440-23-5
7440-31-5
7440-62-2
7440-66-6
Parmname
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Sodium
Tin
Vanadium
Zinc
Client RDl or Reporting PQl & Unit Units
500 ug/L
25 ug/L
10 ug/L
30 ug/L
500 ug/L
10 ug/L
10 ug/L
20 ug/L
500 ug/L
500 ug/L
100 ug/L
15 ug/L
10 ug/L
Product: MIMTAL20_L VVorkdef ID: 1308788 In Product Group? Yes Group Name: PROD_GROUP02
Method: EPA 200.8
Product Description: 200.8/200.2 TAL
Samples: 001 ,002,003,004,005,006,007,008,009,010
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS #
7440-38-2
7440-41-7
7440-43-9
7440-50-8
7439-92-1
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
7440-28-0
7440-61-1
Parmname
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Copper
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Client RDl or Reporting
PQl & Unit Units
5 ug/L
.5 ug/L
.5 ug/L
10 ug/L
1 ug/L
5 ug/L
10 ug/L
.5 ug/L
.3 ug/L
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 315400
Page 3 of 4
Group Reference: Full metals suite
Path: Standard
Product Reference: use product group
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
Group Reference: Full metals suite
Path: Standard
Product Reference: use product group
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? inQC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
REG Y Y
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Product: GFCTORAL Workdef 10: 1297250 In Product Group? No
Method: EPA 900.1 Modified
Product Description: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Samples: 001,002,003,004,005,006,007,008,009,010
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS #
Contingent
Tests
Parmname
Gross Radium Alpha
Action Product Name
login Requirements:
Requirement
Description
Group Name:
Client RDl or
PQl & Unit
Samples
Reporting
Units
pC ilL
Include? Comments
Peer Review by: ____________ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 315400
Page 4 of 4
Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
Sample Analysis
Sample ID
315400001
315400002
315400003
315400004
315400005
315400006
315400007
315400008
315400009
315400010
1202782902
1202792715
1202782903
1202792716
1202782906
1202782904
1202782905
1202782893
1202782894
1202782897
1202782895
1202782896
1202789206
1202789207
1202789210
1202789208
1202789209
Metals Fractional Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 315400
Client ID
MW-ll 11122012
MW-15 11142012
MW-25 11122012
MW-26 11152012
MW-27 11132012
MW-28 11142012
MW-29 11142012
MW-30 11132012
MW-35 11132012
MW-36 11142012
Method Blank (MB) ICP
Method Blank (MB) ICP
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
315400001(MW-ll_11122012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
315400001(MW-ll_11122012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
315400001(MW-ll_11122012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
Method Blank (MB) ICP-MS
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
315400001(MW-ll_11122012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
315400001(MW-ll_11122012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
315400001(MW-ll_11122012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
Method Blank (MB) CV AA
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
315400001 (MW -11_111220 12L) Serial Dilution (SD)
315400001(MW-ll_11122012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
315400001(MW-ll_11122012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Method/Analysis Information
Analytical Batch:
Prep Batch:
Standard Operating
Procedures:
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
1264523, 1268686, 1264520 and 1267206
1264522, 1268683, 1264518 and 1267205
GL-MA-E-013 REV# 21, GL-MA-E-016 REV# 9, GL-MA-E-
014 REV# 24 and GL-MA-E-OI0 REV# 25
EPA 200.7, EPA 200.8 and EPA 245.11245.2
EPA 200.2 and EPA 245.11245.2 Prep
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
The SOP stated above has been prepared based on technical research and testing
conducted by GEL Laboratories, LLC. and with guidance from the regulatory documents
listed in this "Method/Analysis Information" section .
. System Configuration
The Metals analysis-ICP was performed ona P E 4300 Optima radial/axial-viewing
inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer. The instrument is equipped
with a Burgener nebulizer, cyclonic spray chamber, and yttrium or scandium internal
standard. Operating conditions for the ICP are set at a power level of 1500 watts. The
instrument has a peristaltic pump flow rate of 1.4L/min, argon gas flows of 15 L/min and
0.2 L/min for the torch and auxiliary gases, and a flow setting ofO.65L/min for the
nebulizer.
The Metals analysis-ICP was performed on aPE 7300 Optima radial/axial-viewing
inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer. The inst11l:ment is equipped
with a Burgener nebulizer, cyclonic spray chamber, and yttrium or scandium internal
standard. Operating conditions for the ICP are set at a power level of 1500 watts. The
instrument has a peristaltic pump flow rate of 1.4L/min, argon gas flows of 15 L/min and
0.2 L/min for the torch and auxiliary gases, and a flow setting ofO.65L/min for the
nebulizer.
The Metals analysis -ICPMS was performed on a Perkin Elmer ELAN 9000 inductively
coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The instrument is equipped with a cross-
flow nebulizer, quadrupole mass spectrometer, and dual mode electron multiplier
detector. Internal standards of scandium, germanium, indium, tantalum, and/or lutetium
were utilized to cover the mass spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W power
and combined argon pressures of 3607 kPa for the plasma and auxiliary gases, and 0.85
L/min carrier gas flow, and an initial lens voltage of 5.2.
The Metals analysis-Mercury was performed on a Perkin-Elmer Flow Injection Mercury
System (FIMS-l 00) automated mercury analyzer. The instrument consists of a cold vapor
atomic absorption spectrometer set to detect mercury at a wavelength of 253.7 nm.
Sample introduction through the flow injection system is performed via a peristaltic
pump at 9 mL/min and nitrogen carrier gas rate of 80 mL/min.
Calibration Information
Instrument Calibration
All initial calibration requirements have been met for this sample delivery group (SDG).
CRDL Requirements
All CRDL standards met the advisory control limits with the exceptions of potassium and
tin that recovered outside the advisory control limits.
ICSAlICSAB Statement
All interference check samples (ICSA and ICSAB) associated with this SDG met the
established acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Blank (CCB) Requirements
All continuing calibration blanks (CCB) bracketing this batch met the established
acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) Requirements
All continuing calibration verifications (CCV) bracketing this SDG met the acceptance
criteria.
Ouality Control (OC) Information
Method Blank (MB) Statement
The MBs analyzed with this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Recovery
The LCS spike recoveries met the acceptance limits.
Quality Control (QC) Sample Statement
The following sample was selected as the quality control (QC) samples for this SDG:
315400001 (MW-ll_11122012)-ICP, ICP-MS and CV AA.
Matrix Spike (MS) Recovery Statement
The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the MS analyses are evaluated when the
sample concentration is less than four times (4X) the spike concentration added. All
applicable elements met the acceptance criteria.
Duplicate Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The RPD obtained from the designated sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated based on
acceptance criteria of 20% when the sample is >5X the contract required detection limit
(RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control
of RL is used to evaluate the DUP results. All applicable analytes met these requirements.
Serial Dilution % Difference Statement
The serial dilution is used to assess matrix suppression or enhancement. Raw element
concentrations that are 25X the IDL/MDL for CV AA, 50X the IDL/MDL for ICP, and
100X the IDL/MDL for ICP-MS analyses are applicable for serial dilution assessment.
All applicable analytes met the acceptance criteria of less than 10% difference (%D).
Technical Information
Holding Time Specifications
GEL assigns holding times based on the associated methodology, which assigns the date
and time from sample collection of sample receipt. Those holding times expressed in
hours are calculated in the AlphaLIMS system. Those holding times expressed as days
expire at midnight on the day of expiration. All samples in this SDG met the specified
holding time.
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
All procedures were performed as stated in the SOP.
Sample Dilutions Dilutions are performed to minimize matrix interferences resulting
from elevated mineral element concentrations present in solid samples and/or to bring
over range target analyte concentrations into the linear calibration range of the
instrument. The samples on the ICP required dilution in order to bring over range sodium
concentrations within the linear calibration range of the instrument. Dilutions were
required for this SDG in order to minimize copper and tin suppression due to matrix
interferences. Sample 31500001 was diluted for over ranged potassium. Samples
31500006 and 31500009 on Optima 5 required dilutions in order to bring raw calcium
values within the linear range of the instrument, and for potassium that calcium interferes
with, in order to ensure that the inter-element correction factors were valid. Samples
31500006 and 31500009 on Optima 2 required dilutions in order to bring raw calcium
values within the linear range of the instrument, and for molybdenum and zinc that
calcium interferes with, in order to ensure that the inter-element correction factors were
valid.
Preparation Information
The samples in this SDG were prepared exactly according to the cited SOP.
Miscellaneous Information
Electronic Packaging Comment
This data package was generated using an electronic data processing program referred to
as virtual packaging. In an effort to increase quality and efficiency, the laboratory has
developed systems to generate all data packages electronically. The following change
from traditional packages should be noted:
Analyst/peer reviewer initials and dates are not present on the electronic data files.
Presently, all initials and dates are present on the original raw data. These hard copies are
temporarily stored in the laboratory. An electronic signature page inserted after the case
narrative will include the data validator's signature and title. The signature page also
includes the data qualifiers used in the fractional package. Data that are not generated
electronically, such as hand written pages, will be scanned and inserted into the electronic
package.
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports (DERs) are generated to document procedural anomalies that may
deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER)
was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this SDG.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis
has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the
analytical case narrative.
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition,
all data designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation
upon completion of the data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case
narrative:
Reviewer:
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis Report
for
DNMI001 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 315400 GEL Work Order: 315400
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
* * Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
U Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
The designation ND, if present, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above
the limit as defined in the 'U' qualifier above.
This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC
standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Heather Shaffer.
Reviewed by
GEL LASORA TORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
>arameter
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-ll 11122012
Lab Sample ID: 315400001
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.1/245.2 Prep EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
1 EPA 245 .11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.7
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
AXS5
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 5,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
Chent sua: j 1 )4UU Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
11130112 1551 1267205
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-15 11142012
Lab Sample ID: 315400002
Qualifier Result
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EP A 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.7
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
AXS5
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 5,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
ClIent SUU: 3 I 5400 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
11 /30/12 1551 1267205
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRLcolumn reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
)arameter
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-25 11122012
Lab Sample ID: 315400003
Qualifier Result
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 5,2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Chent SUG: 3 15400 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Comments
EPA 245.1/245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4-EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.7
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-26 11152012
Lab Sample ID: 315400004
Qualifier Result
EPA 245 .11245.2 Prep EPA 245 Mercury
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
2
3
4
5
6
7
EPA 245.11245.2
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
Report Date: February 5, 2013
Protect: DNMIOOI00
Client ID: DNMIOOI
ClIent SUU: 3 15400
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
AXS5 11130112 1551 1267205
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
>arameter
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-27 lll32012
Lab Sample ID: 315400005
Qualifier Result
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 5, 2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Chent SDU: Jl)4UU
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Comments
1 EPA 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.7
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
>arameter
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-28 11142012
Lab Sample ID: 315400006
Qualifier Result
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 5, 2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
ClIent SU(J: 3 I 5400 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Comments
EP A 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.7
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Report Date: February 5, 2013
Client Sample ID: MW:.29 11142012 Proiect: DNMI00100
Lab Sample ID: 315400007 Client ID: DNMI001
--------------------~------------------------------------~C~I-le-,nt~G: 315400
>arameter Qualifier Result Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
EPA 245.1 /245.2 Prep EPA 245 Mercury AXS5 11/30112 1551 1267205
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Comments
1 EPA 245.1/245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.7
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
>arameter
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-30 11132012
Lab Sample ID: 315400008
Qualifier Result
Report Date: February 5,2013
Proiect: DNMIOOIOO
Client ID: DNMIOOI
ClIent sua: 3 I 5400 Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Comments
EP A 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.7
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
)arameter
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-35 11132012
Lab Sample ID: 315400009
Qualifier Result
Proiect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 5,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
ClIent SUG: j 1 )4UU
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method ------------------------------------------------------------------------------The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Comments
EPA 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.7
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
)arameter
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-36 11142012
Lab Sample ID: 315400010
Prolect:
Client ID:
Report Date: February 5,2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
------------------------~C~I~le~n~t~S~D~G~:--~3~I5~4~O~O~--------------------
Qualifier Result Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
EPA 245.11245.2 Prep EPA 245 Mercury AXS5 11130112 1551 1267205
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description Analyst Comments
EPA 245.11245.2
2 EPA 200.7
3 EPA 200.7
4 EPA 200.7
5 EPA 200.7
6 EPA 200.8
7 EPA 200.8
8 EPA 200.8
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar:y ReDort Date: February 5, 2013 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page lof 5 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 315400
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Ran~e Anlst Date Time
\1etals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1264520
QC1202782895 315400001 DUP
Arsenic U 5.00 U 5.00 ug/L N/A RMJ 11123112 16:1,
Beryllium U 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A
Cadmium U 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A
Lead U 1.00 U 1.00 ug/L N/A
Selenium U 5.00 U 5.00 ug/L N/A
Thallium U 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A
Uranium 0.786 0.721 ug/L 8.63 /\ (+1-0.300)
QC1202782894 LCS
Arsenic 50.0 50.1 ug/L 100 (85%-115%) 11123112 16:0·
Beryllium 50.0 52.6 ug/L 105 (85%-115%)
Cadmium 50.0 52.2 ug/L 104 (85%-115%)
Lead 50.0 52.0 ug/L 104 (85%-115%)
Selenium 50.0 53.4 ug/L 107 (85%-115%)
Thallium 50.0 48.5 ug/L 97 (85%-115%)
Uranium 50.0 54.2 ug/L 108 (85%-115%)
QC1202782893 MB
Arsenic U 5.00 ug/L 11123112 15:5
Beryllium U 0.500 ug/L
Cadmium U 0.500 ug/L
Lead U 1.00 ug/L
Selenium U 5.00 ug/L
Thallium U 0.500 ug/L
Uranium U '0.300 ug/L
QC1202782896 315400001 MS
Arsenic 50.0 U 5.00 53.2 ug/L 105 (75%-125%) 11123/12 16:2
Beryllium 50.0 U 0.500 51.9 ug/L 104 (75%-125%)
Cadmium 50.0 U 0.500 51.3 ug/L 102 (75%-125%)
Lead 50.0 U 1.00 50.2 ug/L 100 (75%-125%)
Selenium 50.0 U 5.00 55.1 ug/L 109 (75%-125%)
Thallium 50.0 U 0.500 46.0 ug/L 91.3 (75%-125%)
Uranium 50.0 0.786 54.9 ug/L 108 (75%-125%)
QC1202782897 315400001 SDILT
Arsenic U 8.50 U 8.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 11123112 16:2
Beryllium U 1.00 U 1.00 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Cadmium U 0.550 U 0.550 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Lead U 2.50 U 2.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Selenium U 7.50 U 7.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Thallium U 2.25 0.477 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 315400 Page 2 of 5
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
\fetals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1264520
Uranium 0.786 0.176 ug/L 12 (0%-10%)
3atch 1272955
QC 1202804820 314781001 OUP
Copper U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A SKJ 01104/13 16:3
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A 01107/13 17:5
QC1202804824 315400001 OUP
Copper U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A 01104/13 16:4
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A 0110311322:0·
QC1202804819 LCS
Copper 50.0 53.6 ug/L 107 (85%-115%) 01104/13 16:2
Silver 50.0 52.4 ug/L 105 (85%-115%) 01103113 21: 1
QC 1202804818 MB
Copper U 10.0 ug/L 01/04/13 16:21
Silver U 10.0 ug/L 01103113 21: 1·
QC1202804821 314781001 MS
Copper 50.0 U 10.0 50.0 ug/L 94.1 (75%-125%) 01104113 16:3
Silver 50.0 U 10.0 55.7 ug/L 111 (75%-125%) 01107113 17:5
QC1202804825 315400001 MS
Copper 50.0 U 10.0 49.5 ug/L 92 (75%-125%) 01 /04/13 16:4'
Silver 50.0 U 10.0 47.3 ug/L 94.6 (75%-125%) 0110311322:0
QC 1202804822 314781001 SOILT
Copper U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01 /04/13 16:3
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01107/13 17:5'
QC1202804834 315400001 SOILT
Copper U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01 /04/13 16:5
Silver U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 01 /03/13 22:1
\fetals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1264523
QC1202782904 315400001 OUP
Calcium 69300 72100 ug/L 3.91 (0%-20%) LS 12106112 11 :4·
Chromium U 25.0 U 25.0 ug/L N/A
Cobalt U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A
Iron 220 /225 ug/L 2.05 (0%-20%)
\
Magnesium 21400 22100 ug/L 3.13 (0%-20%)
Manganese 138 142 ug/L 3.18 (0%-20%)
Molybdenum U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A
Nickel U 20.0 U 20.0 ug/L N/A
Potassium 6970 6490 ug/L 7.19 (0%-20%) JWJ 12/0611220:51
Sodium 562000 565000 ug/L 0.497 (0%-20%)
Tin U 100 U 100 ug/L N/A LS 12/06112 13 :5
Vanadium U 15.0 U 15.0 ug/L N/A 12/06112 11 : 4·
Zinc U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L N/A
QC1202782903 LCS
Calcium 5000 5190 ug/L 104 (85%-115%) 12/06112 11:3
Chromium 500 520 ug/L 104 (85%-115%)
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 315400 Page 3 of 5
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
\1etals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1264523
Cobalt 500 523 ug/L 105 (85%-115%)
Iron 5000 5120 ug/L 102 (85%-115%) LS 12/06/12 11:3
Magnesium 5000 5290 ug/L 106 (85%-115%)
Manganese 500 526 ug/L 105 (85%-115%)
Molybdenum 500 513 ug/L 103 (85%-115%)
Nickel 500 524 ug/L 105 (85%-115%)
Potassium 5000 5050 ug/L 101 (85%-115%) JWJ 12/06/1220:4·
Sodium 5000 5020 ug/L 100 (85%-115%)
Tin 500 517 ug/L 103 (85%-115%) LS 12/06/12 11:3
Vanadium 500 529 ug/L 106 (85%-115%)
Zinc 500 515 ug/L 103 (85%-115%)
QC1202782902 MB
Calcium U 500 ug/L 12/06/12 11:3-
Chromium U 25.0 ug/L
Cobalt U 10.0 ug/L
Iron U 30.0 ug/L
Magnesium U 500 ug/L
Manganese U 10.0 ug/L
Molybdenum U 10.0 ug/L
Nickel U 20.0 ug/L
Potassium U 500 ug/L JWJ 12/06/1220:4
Sodium U 500 ug/L
Tin U 100 ug/L LS 12/06/12 11: 3-
Vanadium U 15.0 ug/L
Zinc U 10.0 ug/L
QC 1202782905 315400001 MS
Calcium 5000 69300 73700 ug/L N/A (75%-125%) 12/06/12 11:4
Chromium 500 U 25.0 489 ug/L 97.8 (75%-125%)
Cobalt 500 U 10.0 492 ug/L 98.4 (75%-125%)
Iron 5000 220 5180 ug/L 99.2 (75%-125%)
Magnesium 5000 21400 26400 ug/L N/A (75%-125%)
Manganese 500 138 618 ug/L 95.9 (75%-125%)
Molybdenum 500 U 10.0 506 ug/L 99.5 (75%-125%)
Nickel 500 U 20.0 491 ug/L 98.3 (75%-125%)
Potassium 5000 6970 11200 ug/L 84.9 (75%-125%) JWJ 12/06/1220:5
Sodium 5000 562000 565000 ug/L N/A (75%-125%)
Tin 500 U 100 430 ug/L 86 (75%-125%) LS 12/06/12 13:5
Vanadium 500 U 15.0 517 ug/L 103 (75%-125%) 12/06/12 11:4
Zinc 500 U 10.0 498 ug/L 99.7 (75%-125%)
QC1202782906 315400001 SDILT
Calcium 69300 13700 ug/L 1.26 (0%-10%) 12/06/12 11 :51
Chromium U 25.0 U 25.0 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Cobalt U 10.0 U 10.0 ug/L. N/A (0%-10%)
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 315400
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC%
\1etals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1264523
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Sodium
Tin
Vanadium
Zinc
\1etals Analysis-Mercury
3atch 1267206
QC1202789208 315400001
Mercury
QCI202789207 LCS
Mercury
QC1202789206 MB
Mercury
QC1202789209 315400001
Mercury
QC 1202789210 315400001
Mercury
Notes:
DUP
2.00
MS
2.00
SDILT
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
u
u
u
u
u
U
U
U
The rIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
220 45.7 ug/L 3.86
21400 4310 ug/L .69
138 27.5 ug/L .203
10.0 4.38 ug/L N/A
20.0 U 20.0 ug/L N/A
697 185 ug/L 32.6
56200 11700 ug/L 4.36
125 U 125 ug/L N/A
15.0 U 15.0 ug/L N/A
16.5 U 16.5 ug/L N/A
0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A
2.13 ug/L
U 0.500 ug/L
0.500 2.13 ug/L
0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
Estimated Value
106
106
Page 4 of 5
Range Anlst Date Time
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%) LS 12/06/12 11 :51
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%) JWJ 12/0611220:5,
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%) LS 12/06112 14:0
(0%-10%) 12/06112 11 :51
(0%-10%)
BYVI 12/03112 10:5.
(85%-115%) 12/03112 10:5
12/03112 10:51
(75%-125%) 12/03112 10:5
(0%-10%) 12/03112 10:5'
A
B
BD
C
D
E
F
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H
K
L
M
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be 10weL
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higheL
M if above MDC and less than LLD
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 315400
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC%
M Matrix Related Failure
N Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
N/ A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Page 5 of 5
Range Anlst
Nt
ND
NJ
Q
R
V
V
VI
VJ
UL
X
Y
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
/\
h
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
N/ A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
Date Time
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DVP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DVP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Method/Analysis Information
Product:
Analytical Method:
Analytical Batch Number:
Sample ID
315400001
315400002
315400003
315400004
315400005
315400006
315400007
315400008
315400009
315400010
1202783174
1202783175
1202783176
1202783177
1202783178
Radiochemistry Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG315400
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
EPA 900.1 Modified
1264639
Client ID
MVV-11 11122012
MVV-15 11142012
MVV-25 11122012
MVV-26 11152012
MVV-27 11132012
MVV-28 11142012
MVV-29 11142012
MVV-30 11132012
MVV-35 11132012
MVV-36 11142012
Method Blank (MB)
315400008(MVV -30_11132012) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
315400008(MVV-30_11132012) Matrix Spike (MS)
315400008(MVV-30_11132012) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-RAD-A-010 REV# 14.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information
All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information
Standard solutions for these analysis are NIST traceable or verified with a NIST traceable standard and used
before the expiration dates.
Sample Geometry
All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information
The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 315400008 (MW-30_11132012).
QC Information
All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Chemical Recoveries
All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMIOO 1 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 315400 GEL Work Order: 315400
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
* * Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
Review IValidation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all eLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the infonnation presented in this data report:
Signature: Name: Kate Gellatly
Date: 30 NOV 2012 Title: Analyst I
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 315400
Parmname NOM
Rad Gas Flow
Batch 1264639
QC1202783175 315400008 DUP
Gross Radium Alpha U
Uncertainty
QC1202783178 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha 556
Uncertainty
QC 12027.83174 MB
Gross Radium Alpha
Uncertainty
QC1202783176 315400008 MS
Gross Radium Alpha 558 U
Uncertainty
QC 1202783177 315400008 MSD
Gross Radium Alpha 558 U
Uncertainty
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
QC SUmmar!
Sample Qual QC Units RPD%
1.00 1.26 pCi/L 33.2
+1-0.239 +1-0.273
588 pCi/L
+1-5.58
U 1.00 pCiIL
+1-0.199
1.00 521 pCi/L
+1-0.239 +1-4.75
1.00 563 pCi/L 7.79
+1-0.239 +1-5.26
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
Estimated Value
Renort Date: November 30, 2012
Page 10f 2
REC% Range Anlst
(0% -100%) KDFI
106 (75%-125%)
93.2 (75%-125%)
101 (0%-20%)
Date Ti
11125/12 1
11/26/12 (
11125/12 1
11126/12 (
11126/12 (
A
B
BD
C
D
E
F
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H
K
L
M
M
N
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Matrix Related Failure
Metals..,-The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 315400 Page 2 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
NI
ND
NJ
Q
R
U
UI
UJ
UL
X
Y
/\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the yRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or-Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
I NI A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
Date Ti
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater tha
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +1-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
TabF
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
TabF1
Laboratory Analytical Reports-Accelerated Monitoring
October 2012
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
>arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-ll 10232012
Lab Sample ID: 313984001
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 23-0CT-12 12:05
Receive Date: 25-0CT-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
Vletals Analysis-ICP
~OO.2/200. 7 Mangane~,!!s Received"
\1anganese 161
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.7
SRL CRDL
10.0 10.0
Analyst
AXG2
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: January 31, 2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
313984
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
uglL 1 HSC 11 /03/12 14:53 1258594 1
Date Time Prep Batch
11101/12 0750 1258593
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the cRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
Company : Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
MVV-14 10232012
313984002
Ground VV ater
23-0CT-12 13:35
25-0CT-12
Client
Qualifier Result
Vletals Analysis-ICP
~OO.2/200. 7 Manganese ''As Received"
vianganese 2110
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.7
SRL CRDL
10.0 10.0
Analyst
AXG2
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: January 31, 2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
313984
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
ug/L 1 HSC 11103112 14:41 1258594 1
Date Time Prep Batch
11 /01112 0750 1258593
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the cRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-25 10222012
Lab Sample ID: 313984003
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 22-0CT-1212:15
Receive Date: 25-0CT-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
vletals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.21200.8 Uranium ''As Received"
lranium 6.37
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.8
SRL CRDL
0.300 0.300
Analyst
AXG2
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date : January 31, 2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
313984
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
uglL 1 SKJ 11/08112 13:13 1258592 1
Date Time Prep Batch
11/01112 0755 1258591
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the cRDL.
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail:[e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: October Monthly GW 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210420-001
Client Sample ID: MW-26_10242012
Collection Date: 10/2412012 845h
Received Date: 10/2512012 1015h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 1114/2012 1448h E300.0 1.00 2.62
NitratelNitrite (as N) mglL 10/3112012 1747h E353.2 1.00 3.50
1 _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix inteiference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 2/1112013 Page 5 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff: or reproduction of this report in. c~nnection ~ith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro, cess, or, in connection with the r,:-~ubli~tion of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: October Monthly GW 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210420-001C
Client Sample ID: MW-26_10242012
Collection Date: 1012412012 845h
Received Date: 10/2512012 1015h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 10/2612012 1108h
Units: Ilg/L Dilution Factor: 100 Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Compound Number Limit Result Qual
Chloroform 67-66-3 200 4,720
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 17060-07-0 6,080 5,000 122 72-151
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 5,550 5,000 111 80-128
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane 1868-53-7 5,640 5,000 113 80-124
SUIT: Toluene-d8 2037-26-5 4,920 5,000 98.3 77-129
~ -The reporting limits were raised due to high analyte concentrations.
Analyzed: 10/26/2012855h
Units: Ilg/L Dilution Factor: Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Compound Number Limit Result Qual
2-Butanone 78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
Acetone 67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
Benzene 71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
Chloromethane 74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 1.00 15.0
Naphthalene 91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Toluene 108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
Xylenes, Total 1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 17060-07-0 60.1 50.00 120 72-151
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 54.2 50.00 108 80-128
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane 1868-53-7 58.0 50.00 116 80-124
SUIT: Toluene-d8 2037-26-5 49.8 50.00 99.6 77-129
Reissue of a previously generated report. The analyte list has been updated and the reporting limits have been revised. Information
herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
Report Date: 2/11/2013 Page 8 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached cae. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subse uent use of the name of this com an or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
>arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-26 10242012
Lab Sample ID: 313984004
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 24-0CT-12 08:45
Receive Date: 25-0CT-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
vIetals Analysis-ICP-MS
~OO.2/200.8 Uranium "As Received"
Jranium 26.9
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.8
SRL CRDL
0.300 0.300
Analyst
AXG2
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: January 31, 2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
313984
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
ug/L 1 SKJ 11108112 13:32 1258592 1
Date Time Prep Batch
11101112 0755 1258591
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the cRDL.
463 West 3600 South
,alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
/ Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: October Monthly GW 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210420-002
Client Sample ID: MW-30_10232012
Collection Date: 10/23/2012 1025h
Received Date: 10/25/2012 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
-Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mgIL
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
1114/2012 1511h E300.0 1.00
10/3112012 1748h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
135
16.2
Report Date: 211112013 Page 6 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction 'of this report in connection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or p~o.cess, orin connection with the re.-public~tion of ~is report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
>arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
MVV-30 10232012
313984005
Ground VV ater
23-0CT-12 10:25
25-0CT-12
Client
Qualifier Result
vIetals Analysis-ICP-MS
~OO.2/200.8 Selenium ''As Received"
;elenium 45.2
7.86 Jranium
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
1
2
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
SRL
5.00
0.300
CRDL
5.00
0.300
Analyst
AXG2
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: January 31, 2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
313984
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Date
ug/L
uglL
11101/12
SKJ 11 /08112 03:44 1258592 1
SKJ 11 /08112 13:36 1258592 2
Time Prep Batch
0755 1258591
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the cRDL.
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: October Monthly GW 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210420-003
Client Sample ID: MW-31_10222012
Collection Date: 10/22/2012 1345h
Received Date: 10/2512012 1015h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mglL
NitratelNitrite (as N) mgIL
Sulfate mglL
Total Dissolved Solids mglL
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
1114/2012 1535h E300.0 100
10/3112012 1756h E353.2 10.0
1114/2012 1535h E300.0 75.0
10/2512012 1145h SM2540C 20.0
Analytical
Result Qual
157
18.0
545
1,320
Report Date: 2/11/2013 Page 7 of18
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of-its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the ~verti~ement, pro. motion or sale .of any product or pro. cess, or. in co~ection with the re.-~ubli~tion ,?f ~is report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
>arameter
vIetals Analysis-ICP
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-35 10232012
Lab Sample ID: 313984006
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 23-0CT-12 13:50
Receive Date: 25-0CT-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
~OO.2/200. 7 Manganese ''As Received"
vianganese 253
vIetals Analysis-ICP-MS
~OO.2/200.8 Thallium ''As Received"
;elenium
rhallium
Jranium
19.0
0.517
22.4
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
2
3
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
SRL
10.0
5.00
0.500
0.300
CRDL
10.0
5.00
0.500
0.300
Analyst
AXG2
AXG2
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: January 31, 2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
313984
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Date
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
11101112
11/01112
1 HSC 11/03/12 14:56 1258594 1
SKJ 11108112 03:50 1258592 2
SKJ 11108112 13:39 1258592 3
Time Prep Batch
0755
0750
1258591
1258593
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the cRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: November 12,2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-35 10232012
Sample ID: 313984006
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
23-0CT-12 13:50
25-0CT-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 4.31 +/-0.409
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.352
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCiIL KDFI 11108/12 0918 1257861
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
101 (25%-125%)
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
>arameter
vIetals Analysis-ICP
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-65 10232012
Lab Sample ID: 316260001
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 23-0CT-12 13:50
Receive Date: 25-0CT-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
100.21200.7 Manganese "As Received"
vianganese 248
vIetals Analysis-ICP-MS
~00.21200.8 Thallium ''As Received"
;elenium
rhallium
Jranium
18.4
0.680
23 .7
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
2
3
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.8
EPA 200.8
SRL
10.0
5.00
0.500
0.300
CRDL
10.0
5.00
0.500
0.300
Analyst
AXG2
AXG2
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: February 5, 2013
DNMIOOIOO
DNMIOOI
316260
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Date
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
12/07/12
12/07112
1 JWJ 12/14112 21 :04 1268448 1
SKJ 12112112 03:49 1268450 2
PRB 12114112 17:47 1268450 3
Time Prep Batch
0730
0730
1268449
1268447
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: December 12,2012
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-65 10232012
Sample ID: 316260001
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
23-0CT-12 l3:50
25-0CT-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 5.84 +/-0.706
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.722
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDFI 12/08112 1216 1268531
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
101 (25%-125%)
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATOR I ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
October Monthly GW 2012
1210420-004A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 10/24/2012
Received Date: 10/25/2012 1015h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 10/26/2012952h
Units: Jlg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
X ylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
17060-07-0 62.2 50.00 124
460-00-4 55.8 50.00 112
1868-53-7 55.7 50.00 111
2037-26-5 49.1 50.00 98.2
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Reissue of a previously generated report. The analyte list has been updated and the reporting limits have been revised. Information
herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
Report Date: 2/1112013 Page 9 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are p.erfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection ~th the ~dverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or p~o.cess, or. in connection ~th the re:~ublic~tion ?f ~ report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: October Monthly GW 2012
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ill: 1210420
American West Analytical Laboratories received 4 sample(s) on 10/25/2012 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
This is a revision to a report originally issued 1115/2011. The analyte list has been updated
on pages 8-9 and 15-18, and the reporting limits have been revised on pages 8-9 and 16.
The pagination has been updated on all pages.
Thank You, K yl e F~ ~~::~~~:';'~..:~:;,,~~
/
.OU=AWAL-LaboratOry Director,
G email=[e-mail]. c=US rOS ~()ale:2013:0!1115:13:27-07'OO'
Approved by: ____ ..... Zo;;..'l ______ ----'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 2/11/2013 Page 1 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection ~th the re.-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
::-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Date Received:
Lab Sample ID
1210420-001A
121 0420-00 1B
1210420-001C
1210420-002A
1210420-002B
1210420-003A
1210420-003B
1210420-003C
1210420-004A
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
October Monthly GW 2012
1210420
10/25/2012 1015h
Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
MW-26 10242012 10/24/2012 845h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
MW-26 10242012 10/24/2012 845h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
MW-26 10242012 10124/2012 845h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
MW-30 10232012 10/2312012 1025h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
MW-30 10232012 10/2312012 1025h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
MW-31 10222012 1012212012 1345h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
MW-31 10222012 10/22/2012 1345h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
MW-31 10222012 10/2212012 1345h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Trip Blank 10/2412012 Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 2/11/2013 Page 2 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ",:,ith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or p~o.cess, or. in co~ection ~th the re.-publication of ~is report for any
Inorganic Case Narrative
American West Client: ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
October Monthly GW 2012
1210420
10/25/2012
10/22, 10/23, & 10/24/2012
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions. The MS and MSD percent recoveries' were outside of control
limits for nitratelnitrite on sample 1210420-001A due to sample matrix
interference.
Duplicate (DUP): The parameters that required a duplicate analysis had RPDs
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 211112013 Page 3 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c(}nnection ~th the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro~ess, or in connection ~th the re.-publication ':If t!tis report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
October Monthly GW 2012
1210420
10/25/2012
10/22, 10/23, & 10/24/2012
Intact
None
SW -846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: One target analyte was observed above its reporting limit.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSIMSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 2/1112013 Page 4 of 18
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its'staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1210420
Project: October Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1210420-003CDUP Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
mg/L SM2540C
Result
1,320
Amount
Spiked
Dept: WC
QC Type: DUP
Original
Amount
1,324
%REC Limits %RPD
o
RPD
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Limit Qual Date Analyzed
5 10126/2012 1701h
Report Date: 2/11/2013 Page 10 of18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
''!1b~r of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1210420
Project: October Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS-R47013 Chloride
LCS-R47013 Sulfate
LCS-R47021 NitratelNitrite (as N)
LCS-R46651 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mglL E300.0 4.92 5.000 0 98.5 90-110
mglL E300.0 4.85 5.000 0 97.0 90-110
mglL E353.2 1.00 1.000 0 100 90-110
mgIL SM2540C 190 205.0 0 92.7 80-120
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
11/412012 923h
11/4/2012 923h
10/31120121722h
10/2512012 1145h
Report Date: 2/1112013 Page 11 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
'fiber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1210420
Project: October Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB-R47013 Chloride
MB-R47013 Sulfate
MB-R47021 NitratelNitrite (as N)
MB-R46651 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00
mglL E300.0 < 0.750
mg/L E353.2 < 0.100
mg/L SM2540C < 10.0
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
·111412012 900h
1114/2012 900h
10/3112012 1721h
10/2512012 1145h
Report Date: 2/11/2013 Page 12 of 18
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1210420
Project: October Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID
1210420-003BMS
1210420-003BMS
1210420-001AMS
Analyte
Chloride
Sulfate
NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Units
mglL
mgiL
mglL
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Amount
Method Result Spiked
E300.0 5,110 5,000
E300.0 5,350 5,000
E353.2 14.9 10.00
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MS
Original
Amount %REC Limits
157.0 99.1 90-110
544.5 96.1 90-110
3.498 114 90-110
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the Les.
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
11/4/2012 1621h
11/4/2012 1621h
10/3112012 1751h
Report Date: 2/11/2013 Page 13 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
.mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1210420
Project: October Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID
1210420-003BMSD
1210420-003BMSD
1210420-001AMSD
Analyte
Chloride
Sulfate
NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
OC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mglL E300.0 5,080 5,000 157.0 98.5 90-110
mglL E300.0 5,300 5,000 544.5 95.2 90-110
mgIL E353.2 14.7 10.00 3.498 112 90-110
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
%RPD
0.65
0.886
1.27
RPD
Limit
20
20
10
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1114/2012 1644h
111412012 1644h
10/3112012 175 5h
Report Date: 2/11/2013 Page 14 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
'fiber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1210420
Project: October Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS VOC 102612A Benzene
LCS VOC 102612A Chloroform
LCS VOC 102612A Methylene chloride
LCS VOC 102612A Naphthalene
LCS VOC 102612A Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 102612A Toluene
LCS VOC 102612A Xylenes, Total
LCS VOC 102612A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
LCS VOC 102612A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 102612A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 102612A Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
~glL SW8260C 18.9 20.00 0 94.6 62-127
~glL SW8260C 22.0 20.00 0 110 67-132
~glL SW8260C 22.4 20.00 0 112 32-185
~glL SW8260C 10.4 20.00 0 51.9 28-136
~glL SW8260C 15.2 20.00 0 75.8 43-146
~glL SW8260C 19.6 20.00 0 98.2 64-128
~glL SW8260C 61.8 60.00 0 103 52-134
%REC SW8260C 59.8 50.00 120 76-138
%REC SW8260C 48.1 50.00 96.2 77-121
%REC SW8260C 55.4 50.00 111 67-128
%REC SW8260C 47.5 50.00 95.1 81-135
Reissue of a previously generated report. The analyte list has been updated. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
10/26/2012 739h
10126/2012739h
10/26/2012 739h
10/2612012 739h
10/2612012 739h
10/2612012 739h
10/2612012739h
10126/2012739h
1012612012739h
10/2612012 739h
10/2612012739h
Report Date: 2/1112013 Page 15 of18
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1210420
Project: October Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 102612A 2-Butanone
MB VOC 102612A Acetone
MB VOC 102612A Benzene
MB VOC 102612A Carbon tetrachloride
MB VOC 102612A Chloroform
MB VOC 102612A Chloromethane
MB VOC 102612A Methylene chloride
MB VOC 102612A Naphthalene
MB VOC 102612A Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 102612A Toluene
MB VOC 102612A Xylenes, Total
MB VOC 102612A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 102612A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 102612A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 102612A Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
/lglL SW8260C <20.0
/lglL SW8260C <20.0
/lglL SW8260C < 1.00
/lglL SW8260C < 1.00
/lglL SW8260C < 1.00
/lglL SW8260C < 1.00
/lglL SW8260C < 1.00
/lglL SW8260C < 1.00
/lglL SW8260C < 1.00
/lglL SW8260C < 1.00
/lglL SW8260C < 1.00
%REC SW8260C 61.4 50.00 123 76-138
%REC SW8260C 55.0 50.00 110 77-121
%REC SW8260C 56.0 50.00 112 67-128
%REC SW8260C 49.4 50.00 98.8 81-135
%RPD
Reissue of a previously generated report. The analyte list has been updated and the reporting limits have been revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
10/26/2012 817h
Report Date: 211112013 Page 16 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1210420
Project: October Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1210420-001CMS Benzene
1210420-001 CMS Chloroform
1210420-001 CMS Methylene chloride
1210420-001 CMS Naphthalene
1210420-001 CMS Tetrahydrofuran
1210420-001 CMS Toluene
1210420-001CMS Xylenes, Total
1210420-001 CMS Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1210420-001CMS SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1210420-001 CMS SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1210420-001 CMS SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
JlglL SW8260C 1,990 2,000 0 99.6 66-145
JlglL SW8260C 7,030 2,000 4,725 115 50-146
JlglL SW8260C 2,400 2,000 0 120 30-192
JlglL SW8260C 924 2,000 0 46.2 41-131
JlglL SW8260C 1,750 2,000 0 87.3 43-146
JlglL SW8260C 2,020 2,000 0 101 18-192
JlglL SW8260C 6,220 6,000 0 104 42-167
%REC SW8260C 6,150 5,000 123 72-151
%REC SW8260C 4,800 5,000 96.0 80-128
%REC SW8260C 5,790 5,000 116 80-124
%REC SW8260C 4,680 5,000 93.6 77-129
Reissue of a previously generated report. The analyte list has been updated. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
10126/2012 1127h
10/2612012 1127h
10/26/2012 1127h
10126/2012 1127h
10/26/2012 1127h
10/26/2012 1127h
10/26/2012 1127h
10/26/2012 1127h
1012612012 1127h
10126/2012 1127h
10/26/2012 1127h
Report Date: 2/1112013 Page 17 of 18
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1210420
Project: October Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1210420-001 CMSD Benzene
1210420-001CMSD Chloroform
1210420-001 CMSD Methylene chloride
1210420-001 CMSD Naphthalene
1210420-001 CMSD Tetrahydrofuran
1210420-001 CMSD Toluene
1210420-001 CMSD Xylenes, Total
1210420-001 CM§D SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1210420-001 CMSD SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1210420-001 CMSD SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1210420-001CMSD SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
JlglL SW8260C 1,950 2,000 0 97.6 66-145
JlglL SW8260C 6,870 2,000 4,725 107 50-146
JlglL SW8260C 2,370 2,000 0 119 30-192
JlglL SW8260C 924 2,000 0 46.2 41-131
JlglL SW8260C 1,720 2,000 0 86.0 43-146
JlglL SW8260C 1,970 2,000 0 98.4 18-192
JlglL SW8260C 6,100 6,000 0 102 42-167
%REC SW8260C 6,200 5,000 124 72-151
%REC SW8260C 4,710 5,000 94.3 80-128
%REC SW8260C 5,710 5,000 114 80-124
%REC SW8260C 4,700 5,000 94.0 77-129
Reissue of a previously generated report. The analyte list has been updated. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
%RPD
2.03
2.3
1.09
0
1.5
2.61
2.05
RPD
Limit
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1012612012 1146h
1012612012 1146h
1012612012 1146h
1012612012 1146h
10/26/2012 1146h
1012612012 1146h
10126/2012 1146h
10126/2012 1146h
1012612012 1146h
1012612012 1146h
1012612012 1146h
Report Date: 2/11/2013 Page 18 of 18
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
nber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1210420
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 1 of 1 10/25/2012
Client ID: DEN 1 00 Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: October Monthly GW2012 QC Level: LEVELII+ WOType: Standard
Comments: PA Rush. QC 2+ -include summary and narratives. EDD-Denison. CC [e-mail].; p>(;>
SampleID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1210420-001A ~-26_10242012 10/24/20120845h 10/25/2012 1OI5h 1115/2012 Aqueous N02/N03-W-~ df -n02/n03
353.2
SEL Aoalytes: N03N02N
1210420-001B 300.0-W ~ df-we
SEL Aoalytes: CL
1210420-001C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1210420-002A ~-30_10232012 10/23/2012 1025h N02/N03-W-D df -n02/n03
353.2
1210420-002B 300.0-Vi . ~ df -cl
SEL Aoalytes: CL
1210420-003A MW-31_10222012 10/22/20121345h N02IN03-W-~ df -n02/n03
353.2
SEL Aoalytes: N03N02N
1210420-003B 300.0-W ~ df-we
SEL Aoalytes: CL S04
1210420-003C TDS-W-2S40C D ww -tds
1210420-004A Trip Blank 10/24/2012 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M CN ci' TAT HOK~ HOK __ HOK __ COC Emailed~ ___ _
Client £., v\ e.c .. ~y C;' i) ~ l S
Address 6'-1;). 5 .s. H w y } 9 , ,
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
CHAIN OF
CUSTODY
Lab Sample Set # Iz\0420
. Page 1 of t
g \ ~A..cX.'IA"ft 0 T g' ""L~ i \
City . -.J State Zip
[phone] . . .
463 West 3600 South [phone] Tum Around Time (Circle One)
Salt Lake City, Utah Fax [phone] day 2 day 3 day 4 day 5 day @nd~ -Phone i.-135· 678 6:12.\ Fax _______ _ . 84115 Email:[e-mail]
-_.". __ ... &a..",,,'\iI\.. PL\ ~eA'"" TESTS REQUIRED QC LEVEL LABORATORY USE ONLY -E';'mail :5 PA=\.N'\ ~r Ph ? A.?=~y F veJ S • LOoM "1' 0 -"'U' ~ S~ERE: Project Name O?· ... ob,..t" (ht2-'\,. ~k\y Goa...) ;2,.01::Z ! ~ 0 ® 1 ip .~g.;.red to ,~ 1 2 -0 5 w ~ ~ t;Q ,J to Project Number/P,O.# OatelTime ~ c <J ~~. o~ 2 Ambiento9 ]I '~ -~ '~M 3 3+ 4 Sampler Name 'ra-A. V\..Ge'i \j"Qlr.r1~ Collected ~ V\ N 10 Notes: 0 ~ ~~ :T X '0 ~ 1"--'
3 Temperature " '3° 't:: i ~ ~ :T .... C ',-, , ('Q
Sample 10 ~ ...........: g -I (:\ COMMENTS z "< I-'J V) 4 Received Broken/Leaking
MW-2.k lCJb.=lli~ X >< X. (Improperly s~
lD ;t 1.-126 \ ..2 W 5 y .
Notes:
'.Iv\ W -3 D 10:23:2.0 i.2. 1I{)/~~ W I ~ X' X ..
JV\\A)-31 f 02.;2. ~O l2 l\ol:21..h~1 ):345' w 3 >< ~ ~ f.. 5 ~per\Y Preserv~
ecked at Bench
T \" ~ P (S \ t'A A.L to J 1.~ Ii~ y N
Notes:
'Tt"~{) ~\~.A \( . toll~U~l:2L..l
I
6 Received Within , ~gTimes y . N
coe Tape Was:
1 Present on Outer
~age Relinquished By: Signature Date Received By: Signature ~ Special Instructions: . N NA
Lh~.-P,j tc12'-iltA ,...
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME ~ Time 2 Unbroken on Outer
bt).;.n; '" (' A.l~e.r l33_0 ~age Y N NA
Relinquished By: Signature Date ReceiVed~ Date
3 Present on Sample @
PRINT NAME Time ~ME Time Y N NA
L:. 4 Unbroken on sample~ Relinquished By: Signature ~ Received By: Signature Date • Y N
./
PRINT NAME / Time PRINT NAME Time Discrepancies Between
Sample Labels and COC
Relinquished By: Si~ Rte~a By: $ignat~\bh ~ D~~~ I
Record? G) Date Y AtLLl\JL 1Ll 10 tz..-I Notes:
PRINT NAMli-"" Time P~~~ME,-'--r.:::/ I Tirrle I I
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
. N02 &N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOe
TOX
TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
S Ie Set E
Preservative All ~I"" I...Av",1"' , CAvCI"" --':;-A\..CfJ'
OK
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H2SO4
PH>12 NaOH
pH <2 HN03
pH <2 H2SO4 I"f.~ "\J~~ .'VP~
pH <2 H2SO4
, I I ~
pH<2HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH>9NaOH,
ZI1 Acetate
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H3P04
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H2SO4
pH<2HCL
-
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
-
.... ,,"'''1"'., ~1I.\jt:fJl ",/"<
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate colunm above
Flag ~OC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
Sample Set: I 21 D42.D
-;::;:
'~~I"' ~"~~I' ~1I."t:jJl L;.J\=P, excepT r-~lD~I2..
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1210420
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Page 1 of 1 10/25/2012
Client ID: DEN I 00 Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: October Monthly GW2012 QC Level: LEVELII+ WOType: Standard
Comments: PA Rush. QC 2+ -include summary and narratives. EDD-Denison. CC [e-mail].; P>\t)
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1210420-001A MW-26_10242012 10/24/20120845h 10/2512012 1015h 11/512012 Aqueous N02IN03-W-~ df -no2/no3
353.2
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1210420-001B 300.0-W ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: CL
1210420-001C 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1210420-002A MW-30_10232012 10/23/20121025h N02IN03-W-D df -no2/no3
353.2
1210420-002B 300.0-\\7 ~ df -el
SEL Analytes: CL
1210420-003A MW-31_10222012 10/22/2012 1345h N02IN03-W-~ df -no2/no3
353.2
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1210420-003B 300.0-W ~ df-we
SEL Analytes: CL S04
1210420-003C TDS-W-2540C D ww -tds
1210420-004A Trip Blank 10/24/2012 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M CN ci TAT HOK~ HOK __ HOK __ COC Emailed~ ___ _
Client £ v\ e.C .. '!J'i C'i i 1& 1 S
Address 6'-1:t. 5 .so H w y ) q) ,
g \e...A.cX,'I&(L ____ t>T 'if""'_~·t \
City . ..J State Zip
Phone 1.-13$' k ,8 2-,1.2\ Fax. ______ _
Contact ~~:c""o. f2,-1~~
E;'mail f,pe..\g'\6<}r Ph e.A.<:c~yFVL\S « LOM
Project Name t4;.· ... obt:ct" Mt2.",~k\y &W ;lOI;Z
Project Number/P,O.#
Sampler Name ·rli'e.""-iA-Cc't \..\Qlrlr1~
Sample 10
Mw-2,b lD ;l"', i)..b \ .2
JV\ W -3 0 I ('J :2:-; :2..D i J...
/V'\ Lt) -31 t02_:l.~012
T \; p g, l t"A.A.t-
'If'" .;V\O ~\~.A lc
OatefTime
Collected
It>I:2.41;21 D.~45
11('j/~23i'21 'b25'
1 \0 1:22h.'1..1 1:3i..f5'
1611..~ Ii~
to J :1 .,\ 1.1DI .2.
Relinquished By: Signature Date Received By: Signature L .. -P,l 101.:1..., I t~
>< 'i:: ..... CO ~
w
W
vJ
AMERICAN
WEST CHAIN OF
CUSTODY Lab Sample Set # 12\D420
. Page 1 of i ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES [phone] • . .
463 West 3600 South [phone] Tum Around TIme (Circle One)
Salt Lake Ci,ty, Utah Fax [phone] day 2 day 3 day 4 day 5 day @nda~
84115 Email:[e-mail]
TESTS REQUIRED QC LEVEL LABORATORY USE ONLY
"ti 0 'i ~ ~ S~ERE: . (;) ® 1 iP :fM ~ered '5 rt:\ -.. ,~ 1 2 t::. -0 " w ~ ~ '¥) ,J 0 o~ ~ () () ~~ 2 Ambiento~ ]I '-,\) :r C)~ ··~tIl 3 3+ 4 ~ ,,~ N .~ 1~ Notes: ~ ~~ :T
'0 1"-' 3 Temperature I, '3° .8 .~ ~ ~ :T
C ',-, ~ E -....: :J ~ ...J c COMMENTS z "< !-\J V) 4 Received Broken/Leaking
X )( ·x, (Imprope~y s~ 5 y .
Notes:
I~ x' X ..
:3 >< )( )< .~ 5 ~perty Preserv~
ecked at Bench y N
Notes:
I
6 Received Within
~ingTimeS y . N
s:
COC Tape Was:
1 Present on Outer l!:5age , Special Instructions: . N NA ,..
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME ~ Time 2 Unbroken on Outer
6tl-;.n; J'\. ? A.l~e-r 1330 (!Sage Y N NA
Relinquished By: Signature Date Received~ Date
3 Present on Sample @
PRINT NAME Time ~ME Time Y N NA
" .L'" 4 Unbroken on samPlee Relinquished By: Signature ~ Received By: Signature Date i Y N
,/
PRINT NAME ~ Time PRINT NAME Time Discrepancies Between
Sample Labels and coe
Relinquished By: Si~ Date Rrj~~ D~~f1 I
Record? G) Y lO tz...1 Notes:
PRINT NA~ Time P~~ME ,-'--0 Tinfe ,_
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
. N02 &N03
Nutrients
0&0
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TOX
TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Frequency:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
Preservation Check Sheet
Preservative All ~-CAl-CPl ,-""el-" ,-""e I-' ,
0K
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H2SO4
PH>12 NaOH
pH <2 HN03
pH <2 H2SO4 l\jf' ~. \Jf..'S ''\IPS
pH <2 H2SO4
~' I I --
pH <2 HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH>9NaOH,
Z11 Acetate
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H3P04
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 HCL
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
,-. 1"", , .... 1"' -, '~I"' -'w~t' L-AV .... I"' .• ,-""el-'l ...." ........ 1"'.
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate colunm above
Flag ~ac, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on cac
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
Sample Set: I 21 D42D
r.
'I"' ,-"vel-" C.I\l-Cpl ~ -excepT I'""-t;IOf~ 12,
00#11 1 Laboratories LLC
a member of The GEL Group INC PO Box 30712 Charleston, SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407
P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178
January 29, 2013
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: White Mesa Mill GW
Work Order: 313984
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on October 25, 2012. This revised data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4505.
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Heather Shaffer
Proj ect Manager
III i 1111111 1111111 'II 1I111111 11
www.gel.com
January 29, 2013
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 313984
Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on October 25,
2012 for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All
sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments
concerning sample receipt.
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following samples:
Laboratory ID Client ID
313984001 ~VV-11 10232012
313984002 ~VV-14 10232012
313984003 ~VV-25 10222012
313984004 ~VV-26 10242012
313984005 ~VV-30 10232012
313984006 ~VV-35 10232012
Case Narrative:
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler
Receipt Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: ~etals and
Radiochemistry .
Heather Shaffer
Project ~anager
. Cb. .... ,.,.-.•.......... Ott
Sheet 1 of 1
31398Y 7-
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: GEL Contact: Garrin Palmer or David Turk
2040 Savage Ph: 435 678 2221
Charleston, South Carolina 29407 [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
Project S amplers N ame S amp ers S' Ignature
October Monthly .::J~U~ Groundwater 1012-Tanner Holliday
Date Time
Sample 10 Collected Collected .Laboratory Analysis Requested
MW-11 10232012 10/23/2012 1205 Manganese \
MW-14 10232012 10/23/2012 1335 Manganese .1
MW-25 10222012 10/22/2012 1215 Uranium ~
MW -26 10242012 10/24/2012 845 Uranium I~
MW-30 10232012 10/23/2012 1025 Uranium, Selinium 1"3
MW -35 10232012 10/23/2012 1350 Uranium, Selinium, Manganese,Thallium,Gross Alpha .
Please notify Garrin Palmer or Tanner Holliday of Reciept tempature on these samples Immediately!
Thank you.
Relinquished 8y:(Signature) Date/Time Received 8y:(Signature) .... Date/Time
.:J~II~ 10/24/2012 9~ lO~ 16 .. 2,~ .. r· .
110b O'i:,'.56
Relinquished 8y:(Signature) Date/Time Received 8y:(Signature) Date/Time
Client:
1 Shipping containers received intact
and sealed?
2
2a Daily check performed and passed on
IR temperature gun?
3 Chain of custody documents included
with shipment?
4 Sample containers intact and sealed?
5 Samples requiring chemical
preservation at proper pH?
6 VOA vials free of heads pace (defined
as < 6mm bubble)?
7 Are Encore containers present?
8 Samples received within holding
time?
9 Sample ID's on CDC match ID's on
?
10 Date & time on CDC match date &
time on bottles?
11 Number of containers received match
number indicated on COC?
12 Are sample containers identifiable as
GEL provided?
13 CDC form is properly signed in
relinquished/received sections?
14 Carrier and tracking number.
Comments (Use Continuation Form if needed):
SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
Recei ved: (1;
*If Net Counts> lOOcpm on samples not marked "radioactIve", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further
investigation.
as S
Comnlents/()mllifiiers (Required for Non·Conforming Items)
Circle Applicable:
Seals broken container Leaking container Other (describe)
Preservation Method: ~Blue ice Dry ice None Other (describe)
*all temperatures are recorded in Celsius
Device Serial #:
Secondary Temperature Device Serial # (If Applicable):
Circle Applicable:
Damaged container Leaking container
(If yes, immediately deliver to Volatiles laboratory)
Circle Applicable:
FedEx Air FedEx Ground UPS Field Services Courier Other
PM (or PMA) review: Initials _~i7_i>-=-. _____ Date .I 0 .. z.. S .... L2. Page~of~
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
GEL Work Order/SDG: 313984
Client SDG: 313984
October GW 2012
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
Heather Shaffer
DNMI00100 White Mesa Mill GW
LEVEL3
EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
313984001 MW-11_10232012
313984002 MW-14_10232012
313984003 MW-25_10222012
313984004 MW-26_10242012
313984005 MW-30_10232012
313984006 MW-35_10232012
Client Sample ID Status Tests/Methods
-001 MW-11_10232012 REVW 200.2/200.7 Manganese
-002 MW-14_10232012 REVW 200.2/200.7 Manganese
-003 MW-25_10222012 REVW 200.2/200.8 Uranium
-004 MW-26_10242012 REVW 200.2/200.8 Uranium
-005 MW-30_10232012 REVW 200.2/200.8 Selenium
REVW 200.2/200.8 Uranium
-006 MW-35_10232012 REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
liquid
REVW 200.2/200.7 Manganese
REVW 200.2/200.8 Selenium
REVW 200.2/200.8 Thallium
REVW 200.2/200.8 Uranium
Collect
Date & Time
23-0CT-1212:05
23-0CT-1213:35
22-0CT-1212:15
24-0CT -12 08:45
23-0CT-1210:25
23-0CT-1213:50
Product
Reference
Gross Alpha
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 313984
Page 1 of 3
Work Order Due Date: 15-NOV-12 Collector: C
Package Due Date: 13-NOV-12
EDD Due Date: 15-NOV-12
Due Date: 15-NOV-12
HXS1
Prelogin #: 20121097089
Project Workdef ID: 1294356
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
Receive Time # of Lab
Date & Time Zone Cont. Matrix
Fax Days to
Due Date Process CofC#
Prelog Lab Field
Group QC QC
25-0CT -12 08:50 0 GROUND WATER
25-0CT-12 08:50 0 GROUND WATER
25-0CT -12 08:50 0 GROUND WATER
25-0CT -12 08:50 0 GROUND WATER
25-0CT -12 08:50 0 GROUND WATER
25-0CT -1208:50 0 2 GROUND WATER
Fax Date PM Comments
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
21
21
21
21
21
21
Aux Data
y
4
y
4
y
4
y
4
y
4
y
4
2
2
3
4
Receive
Codes
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 313984
Page 2 of 3
Product: MIM2TL_L Workdef 10: 1295585 In Product Group? No Group Name: Group Reference:
Method: EPA 200.8 Path: Standard
Product Description: 200.2/200.8 Thallium Product Reference:
Samples: 006 Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client RDL or Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
CAS # Parmname PQL & Unit Units Function in Sample? in QC? List?
7440-28-0 Thallium .5 ug/L REG Y Y Yes
Product: GFCTORAL WorkdeflD: 1297250 In Product Group? No Group Name: Group Reference:
Method: EPA 900.1 Modified Path: Standard
Product Description: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Samples: 006 Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client RDL or Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
CAS # Parmname PQL & Unit Units Function in Sample? in QC? List?
Gross Radium Alpha pCi/L REG Y Y Yes
Product: ICP2MN_L WorkdeflD: 1308791 In Product Group? No Group Name: Group Reference:
Method: EPA 200.7 Path: Standard
Product Description: 200.2/200.7 Manganese Product Reference:
Samples: 001,002,006 Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client RDL or Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
CAS # Parmname PQL & Unit Units Function in Sample? inQC? List?
7439-96-5 Manganese 10 ug/L REG Y Y Yes
Product: MIM2SE_L WorkdeflD: 1308792 In Product Group? No Group Name: Group Reference:
Method: EPA 200.8 Path: Standard
Product Description: 200.2/200.8 Selenium Product Reference:
Samples: 005, 006 Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly Client RDL or Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
CAS # Parmname PQL & Unit Units Function in Sample? inQC? List?
7782-49-2 Selenium 5 ug/L REG Y Y Yes
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Product: MIM2U_L VVorkdeflD: 1308794
Method: EPA 200.8
Product Description: 200.2/200.8 Uranium
Samples: 003,004,005,006
In Product Group? No
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS #
7440-61-1
Contingent
Tests
Parmname
Uranium
Action Product Name
login Requirements:
Requirement
Description
Group Name:
Client RDl or
PQl & Unit
.3
Samples
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Include? Comments
Peer Review by: ____________ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked? __ --'---__
Group Reference:
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 313984
Page 3 of 3
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
Sample Analysis
Sample ID
313984001
313984002
313984003
313984004
313984005
313984006
1202768696
1202768697
1202768700
1202768698
1202768699
1202768691
1202768692
1202768695
1202768693
1202768694
Metals Fractional Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 313984
Client ID
~VV-11 10232012
~VV-14 10232012
~VV-25 10222012
~VV-26 10242012
~VV-30 10232012
~VV-35 10232012
~ethod Blank (~) ICP
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
313984002(~VV-14_10232012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
313984002(~-14_10232012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
313984002(~-14_10232012S) ~atrix Spike (~S)
~ethod Blank (~) ICP-MS
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
313984003(~VV-25_10222012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
313984003(~-25_10222012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
313984003(~-25_10222012S) ~atrix Spike (~S)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Method/Analysis Information
Analytical Batch:
Prep Batch:
Standard Operating
Proced ures:
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
1258594 and 1258592
1258593 and 1258591
GL-MA-E-013 REV# 21, GL-MA-E-016 REV# 9 and GL-MA-E-014 REV#
24
EPA 200.7 and EPA 200.8
EPA 200.2
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
The SOP stated above has been prepared based on technical research and testing conducted by GEL Laboratories,
LLC. and with guidance from the regulatory documents listed in this "Method/Analysis Information" section.
System Configuration
The Metals analysis-ICP was performed on aPE 4300 Optima radial/axial-viewing inductively coupled plasma
atomic emission spectrometer. The instrument is equipped with a Burgener nebulizer, cyclonic spray chamber, and
yttrium or scandium internal standard. Operating conditions for the ICP are set at a power level of 1500 watts. The
instrument has a peristaltic pump flow rate of 1.4L/min, argon gas flows of 15 L/min and 0.2 L/min for the torch and
auxiliary gases, and a flow setting of 0.65L/min for the nebulizer.
The Metals analysis -ICPMS was performed on a Perkin Elmer ELAN 6100E inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometer (ICP-MS). The instrument is equipped with a cross-flow nebulizer, quadrupole mass spectrometer, and
dual mode electron multiplier detector. Internal standards of scandium, germanium, indium, tantalum, and/or lutetium
were utilized to cover the mass spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W power and combined argon pressures
of 360+/-7 kPa for the plasma and auxiliary gases, and 0.85 L/min carrier gas flow, and an initial lens voltage of5.2.
Calibration Information
Instrument Calibration
All initial calibration requirements have been met for this sample delivery group (SDG).
CRDL Requirements
All CRDL standard(s) met the referenced advisory control limits.
ICSA/ICSAB Statement
All interference check samples (ICSA and ICSAB) associated with this SDG met the established acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Blank (CCB) Requirements
All continuing calibration blanks (CCB) bracketing this batch met the established acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) Requirements
All continuing calibration verifications (CCV) bracketing this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Quality Control (QC) Information
Method Blank (MB) Statement
The MBs analyzed with this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Recovery
The LCS spike recoveries met the acceptance limits.
Quality Control (QC) Sample Statement
The following samples were selected as the quality control (QC) samples for this SDG: 313984002
(MW-14_10232012)-ICP and 313984003 (MW-2S_10222012)-ICP-MS.
Matrix Spike (MS) Recovery Statement
The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the MS analyses are evaluated when the sample concentration is less than
four times (4X) the spike concentration added. All applicable elements met the acceptance criteria.
Duplicate Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The RPD obtained from the designated sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated based on acceptance criteria of 20%
when the sample is >SX the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value
is less than SX the RL, a control of +!-RL is used to evaluate the DUP results. All applicable analytes met these
requirements.
Serial Dilution % Difference Statement
The serial dilution is used to assess matrix suppression or enhancement. Raw element concentrations that are 2SX the
IDLIMDL for CV AA, SOX the IDLIMDL for ICP, and 100X the IDLIMDL for ICP-MS analyses are applicable for
serial dilution assessment. All applicable analytes met the acceptance criteria of less than 10% difference (%D).
Technical Information
Holding Time Specifications
GEL assigns holding times based on the associated methodology, which assigns the date and time from sample
collection of sample receipt. Those holding times expressed in hours are calculated in the AlphaLIMS system. Those
holding times expressed as days expire at midnight on the day of expiration. All samples in thisSDG met the specified
holding time.
Preparation! Analytical Method Verification
All procedures were performed as stated in the SOP.
Sample Dilutions
Dilutions are performed to minimize matrix interferences resulting from elevated mineral element concentrations
present in solid samples and!or to bring over range target analyte concentrations into the linear calibration range of the
instrument. The samples in this SDG did not require dilutions.
Preparation Information
The samples in this SDG were prepared exactly according to the cited SOP.
Miscellaneous Information
Electronic Packaging Comment
This data package was generated using an electronic data processing program referred to as virtual packaging. In an
effort to increase quality and efficiency, the laboratory has developed systems to generate all data packages
electronically. The following change from traditional packages should be noted:
Analyst!peer reviewer initials and dates are not present on the electronic data files. Presently, all initials and dates are
present on the original raw data. These hard copies are temporarily stored in the laboratory. An electronic signature
page inserted after the case narrative will include the data validator's signature and title. The signature page also
includes the data qualifiers used in the fractional package. Data that are not generated electronically, such as hand
written pages, will be scanned and inserted into the electronic package.
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports (DERs) are generated to document procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this SDG.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data designated for CLP or
CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
Reviewer:
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis Report
for
DNMIOO 1 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 313984 GEL Work Order: 313984
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
* * Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
U Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the cRDL.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
The designation ND, if present, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above
the RL or LOQ.
This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC
standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Heather Shaffer.
Reviewed By_: --_e>::.._--~-~------=--------=-1..4 S 113
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
. 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary ReDort Date: January 31, 2013 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page lof 2
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 313984
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Ran~e Anlst Date Time
\1etals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1258592
QC1202768693 313984003 DUP
Selenium 1.20 U 5.00 ug/L (+1-5 .00) SKJ 1110811203:0'
Thallium 1.38 1.04 ug/L 28.4 /\ (+1-0.500) 11108112 13:1
Uranium 6.37 6.34 ug/L 0.362 (0%-20%)
QC 1202768692 LCS
Selenium 20.0 21.1 ug/L 106 (85%-115%) 1110811202:5
Thallium 100 96.7 ug/L 96.7 (85%-115%) 11108112 13 :11
Uranium 50.0 51.9 ug/L 104 (85%-115%)
QC1202768691 MB
Selenium U 5.00 ugIL 1110811202:5
Thallium U 0.500 ug/L 11108112 13:0
Uranium U 0.300 ug/L
QC 1202768694 313984003 MS
Selenium 20.0 1.20 25 .3 ug/L (75%-125%) 11/0811203: 1.
Thallium 100 1.38 92.5 ug/L 91.2 (75%-125%) 11/08112 13:21
Uranium 50.0 6.37 57.3 ug/L 102 (75%-125%)
QC1202768695 313984003 SDILT
Selenium 1.20 U 7.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 1110811203:2
Thallium 1.38 0.787 ugIL 185 (0%-10%) 11108/12 13 :2
Uranium 6.37 1.32 ug/L 3.77 (0%-10%)
\1etals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1258594
QC1202768698 313984002 DUP
Manganese 2110 2010 ug/L 4.76 (0%-20%) HSC 11103112 14:4·
QC1202768697 LCS
Manganese 500 512 ug/L 102 (85%-115%) 11103112 14:3'
QC1202768696 MB
Manganese U 10.0 ug/L 11/03112 14:3
QC1202768699 313984002 MS
Manganese 500 2110 2470 ug/L N/A (75%-125%) 11103112 14:4
QC1202768700 313984002 SDILT
Manganese 2110 415 ug/L 1.6 (0%-10%) 11103112 14:51
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
** Ana1yte is a surrogate compound
< Result is less than value reported
> Result is greater than value reported
A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 313984 Page 2 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
B For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
E Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
F Estimated Value
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H Analytical holding time was exceeded
K Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
L Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M M if above MDC and less than LLD
M Matrix Related Failure
N Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
NI A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl
ND
NJ
Q
R
V
V
VI
VJ
UL
X
Y
/\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the cRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
NI A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DVP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +1-the
RL is used to evaluate the DVP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final c~mcentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Method/Analysis Information
Product:
Analytical Method:
Analytical Batch Number:
Sample ID
313984006
1202767021
1202767022
1202767023
1202767024
1202767025
Radiochemistry Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 313984
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
EPA 900.1 Modified
1257861
Client ID
MVV-35 10232012
Method Blank (MB) .
313984006(MVV-35_10232012) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
313984006(MVV-35 _10232012) Matrix Spike (MS)
313984006(MVV-35 _10232012) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-RAD-A-OlO REV# 14.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information
All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information
Standard solutions for these analysis are NIST traceable or verified with a NIST traceable standard and used
before the expiration dates.
Sample Geometry
All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (QC) Information:
Blank Information
The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 313984006 (MVV-35_10232012).
QC Information
All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Chemical Recoveries
All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMI001 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 313984 GEL Work Order: 313984
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
Review IValidation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: ~:;J~~
Date: 12 NOV 2012
Name: Theresa Austin
Title: Group Leader
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summar~ ReDort Date: November 12, 2012 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page lof 2
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 313984
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst Date Ti
Rad Gas Flow
Batch 1257861
QC1202767022 313984006 DUP
Gross Radium Alpha 4.31 3.91 pCi/L 9.78 (0% -20%) KDFI 11/08112 (
Uncertainty +1-0.409 +1-0.398
QC1202767025 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha 556 451 pCi/L 81.1 11/08112 (
Uncertainty +1-4.12
QC1202767021 MB
Gross Radium Alpha U 1.00 pCilL 11108112 (
Uncertainty +1-0.0757
QC1202767023 313984006 MS
Gross Radium Alpha 557 4.31 461 pCi/L 81.9 11108112 (
Uncertainty +1-0.409 +1-4.21
QC1202767024 313984006 MSD
Gross Radium Alpha 557 4.31 493 pCi/L 6.73 87.7 11108112 (
Uncertainty +1-0.409 +1-4.53
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* * Analyte is it surrogate compound
< Result is less than value reported
> Result is greater than value reported
A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
B For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
E Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 1 0%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
F Estimated Value
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H Analytical holding time was exceeded
K Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
L Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M M if above MDC and less than LLD
M Matrix Related Failure
N Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 313984 Page 2 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range AnIst
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl
ND
NJ
Q
R
V
VI
VJ
UL
X
Y
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
NI A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
Date Ti
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater tha-
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +1-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary:
®~! I Laboratories LLC
a member of The GEL Group INC PO Box 30712 Charleston, SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407
P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178
January 29,2013
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: White Mesa Mill GW
Work Order: 316260
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on October 25,2012. This revised data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures. This data package was revised to review the metals data.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4505.
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Heather Shaffer
Project Manager
I ~ il· II I1 . III 1111 n I
www.gel.com
January 29, 2013
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 316260
Sample receipt: The sample arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on October 25,2012
for analysis. The sample was delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All sample
containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. Samples were initially received and
logged under GEL work order 313984. MW-65 was not listed on the chain of custody, but was received. Due to
an inadvertent error, the container for MW-65 was never analyzed. The sample. has been logged and reported
under this SDG ..
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following sample:
Case Narrative:
Laboratory ID
316260001
Client ID
MW-65 10232012
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler
Receipt Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: Metals and
Radiochemistry .
Heather Shaffer
Proj ect Manager
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Sheet 1 of 1
31 39BL4 fo ~~·I~/:5)~
3llt; 2teD' }. t2e(~
Samples Shipped to: GEL Contact: Garrin Palmer or David Turk
2040 Savage Ph: 435 6782221
Charleston, South Carolina 29407 [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
Project Samplers Name Samplers Signature
October Monthly .:J~JI,~~ Groundwater 1012-Tanner Holliday
Date Time
Sample 10 Collected Collected .Laboratory Analysis Requested
MW-11 10232012 10/23/2012 1205 Manganese ,
MW-14 10232012 10/23/2012 1335 Manganese • j
MW-25 10222012 10/22/2012 1215 Uranium 'l
MW -26 10242012 10/24/2012 845 Uranium I~
MW-30 10232012 10/23/2012 1025 Uranium, Selinium I~
MW-35 10232012 10/23/2012 1350 Uranium, Selinium, Manganese,Thallium,Gross Alpha ,
;"' .... J~,..
Please notify Garrin Palmer or Tanner Holliday of Reciept tempature on these samples Immediatelyl
Thank you.
Relinquished By:(Signature) Oate/Time Received By:(Signature) Date/Time
.:l~/I~ 10/24/2012 9-lOJLNVt lD .. 1.S .. r .
1100 e'i:>".56
Relinquished By:(Signature) Date/Time Received By:(Signature) Date/Time
2
2a
3 Chain of custody documents included
with shipment?
4 Sample containers intact and sealed?
5 Samples requiring chemical
preservation at proper pH?
6 VOA vials free of hcadspace (defined
as < 6mm bubble)?
7 Are Encore containers present?
8 ISllmflles received within holding
9 Sample ID's on COC match ID's on
bottles?
10 Date & time on COC match date &
time on bottles?
Number of containers received match
11 number indicated on COe?
sample containers identifiable as
provided?
13 COC form is properly signed in
relinquished/received sections?
14 Carrier and tracking number.
Comments (Use Continu Form If needed):
SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
, contact the Radiation Safety Group for further
Seals broken Dam Other (describe)
Preservation Method: ~Blue ice Dry ice None Other (describe)
·1111 temperatures arc recorded in Celsius
Device II:
ry Temperature Device Serial II (If Applicable):
Circle Applicable:
PedEx Air FedEx Ground UPS Field Services Courier Other
PM (or PMA) review: Initials _9~~=--. ____ Date ,,0 .. 2..·5 ..,l2.. Page -'-of .l..-
~urnaround time for MW-65
of 1
Subject: Turnaround time for MW-65
From: Heather Shaffer <[e-mail]>
Date: 1215/20123:20 PM
To: Kathy Weinel <[e-mail]>
CC: IIteam.shafferll <team.shaffer@gel,com>
Hi Kathy,
Per our conversation, we do have a container labeled for MW-65. We will run this
container for the same analysis that MW-35 was run -Uranium, Selenium, Manganese,
Thallium, and Gross Alpha. The lab can have results in 10 working days.
Thank you!
Heather
Please note: My direct line has changed to [phone].
Heather Shaffer
Project Manager
GEL Laboratories, LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, se (USA) 29407
Direct: 843.769.7386
Main: 843.556.8171 xt 4505
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Web: www.gel.com
12/5/20123:21 PM
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
GEL Work Order/SDG: 316260
Client SDG: 316260
October GW 2012 MW-65 analysis
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
Heather Shaffer
DNMI00100 White Mesa Mill GW
DW16138
LEVEL3
EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
Collect
Date & Time
Work Order Due Date: 19-DEC-12
Package Due Date: 17-DEC-12
EDD Due Date: 19-DEC-12
Due Date: 19-DEC-12
HXS1
Receive Time # of lab
Date & Time Zone Cont. Matrix
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 316260
Page 1 of 3
Collector: C
Prelogin #: 20121298436
Project Workdef ID: 1294356
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
Fax Days to Prelog lab Field
Due Date Process CofC# Group QC QC
316260001 MW-65_10232012 23-0CT-1213:50 25-0CT-12 08:50 0 GROUND WATER 14
Client Sample ID
-001 MVV-65_10232012
Product: MIM2TL_L
Method:
Status Tests/Methods
REVVII GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
liquid
REVVII 200.2/200.7 Manganese
REVVII 200.2/200.8 Selenium
REVVII 200.2/200.8 Thallium
REVVII 200.2/200.8 Uranium
WorkdeflD: 1295585
EPA 200.8
Product Description: 200.2/200.8 Thallium
Samples: 001
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7440-28-0 Thallium
Product: GFCTORAL WorkdeflD: 1297250
Method: EPA 900.1 Modified
Product Description: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Samples: 001
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
Gross Radium Alpha
Product
Reference Fax Date PM Comments
Gross Alpha Relog
In Product Group? No Group Name:
Client RDl or
PQl & Unit
.5
In Product Group? No Group Name:
Aux Data
Cooler Seal Undisturbed y
Temperature (C) 4
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
Units Function in Sample? inQC? List?
ug/L REG Y Y Yes
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Client RDl or Reporting Parm Included Included Custom
PQl & Unit Units Function in Sample? inQC? List?
pCi/L REG Y Y Yes
Receive
Codes
RG
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Product: ICP2MN_L Workdef 10: 1308791 In Product Group? No
Method: EPA 200.7
Product Description: 200.2/200.7 Manganese
Samples: 001
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7439-96-5 Manganese
Product: MIM2SE_L WorkdeflD: 1308792 In Product Group? No
Method: EPA 200.8
Product Description: 200.2/200.8 Selenium
Samples: 001
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7782-49-2 Selenium
Product: MIM2U_L Workdef 10: 1308794 In Product Group? No
Method: EPA 200.8
Product Description: 200.2/200.8 Uranium
Samples: 001
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7440-61-1 Uranium
Action Product Name Description
Contingent
Tests
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
10
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
5
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
.3
Samples
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Group Reference:
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 316260
Page 2 of 3
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y y Yes
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Yes
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Login Requirements:
Requirement Include? Comments
Peer Review by: ____________ _ Work Order (8DG#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 316260
Page 3 of 3
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
Sample Analysis
Sample ID
316260001
1202792094
1202792095
1202792098
1202792096
1202792097
1202792099
1202792100
1202792103
1202792101
1202792102
1202792104
Metals Fractional Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 316260
Client ID
MW-65 10232012
Method Blank (MB) ICP
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
316260001 (MW -65 _102320 12L) Serial Dilution (SD)
316260001(MW-65_10232012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
316260001(MW-65_10232012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
Method Blank (MB) ICP-MS
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
316273001(EffL) Serial Dilution (SD)
316273001 (EffD) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
316273001 (EffS) Matrix Spike (MS)
316273001(EffSD) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Method/Analysis Information
Analytical Batch:
Prep Batch:
Standard Operating
Procedures:
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
1268448 and 1268450
1268447 and 1268449
GL-MA-E-013 REV# 21, GL-MA-E-016 REV# 9 and GL-MA-
E-014 REV# 24
EPA 200.7 and EPA 200.8
EPA 200.2
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
The SOP stated above has been prepared based on technical research and testing conducted by
GEL Laboratories, LLC. and with guidance from the regulatory documents listed in this
"Method/Analysis Information" section.
System Configuration
The Metals analysis-ICP was performed on aPE 7300 Optima radial/axial-viewing inductively
coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer. The instrument is equipped with a Burgener
nebulizer, cyclonic spray chamber, and yttrium or scandium internal standard. Operating
conditions for the ICP are set at a power level of 1500 watts. The instrument has a peristaltic
pump flow rate of lAL/min, argon gas flows of 15 L/min and 0.2 L/min for the torch and
auxiliary gases, and a flow setting of 0.65L/min for the nebulizer.
The Metals analysis -ICPMS was performed on a Perkin Elmer ELAN 61 OOE inductively
coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The instrument is equipped with a cross-flow
nebulizer, quadrupole mass spectrometer, and dual mode electron multiplier detector. Internal
standards-of scandium, germanium, indium, tantalum, and/or lutetium were utilized to cover the
mass spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W power and combined argon pressures of
360+/-7 kPa for the plasma and auxiliary gases, and 0.85 L/min carrier gas flow, and an initial
lens voltage of 5.2.
The Metals analysis -ICPMS was performed on a Perkin Elmer ELAN 9000 inductively coupled
plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The instrument is equipped with a cross-flow nebulizer,
quadrupole mass spectrometer, and dual mode electron multiplier detector. Internal standards of
scandium, germanium, indium, tantalum, and/or lutetium were utilized to cover the mass
spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W power and combined argon pressures of 360+/-
7 kPa for the plasma and auxiliary gases, and 0.85 L/min carrier gas flow, and an initial lens
voltage of 5.2.
Calibration Information
Instrument Calibration
All initial calibration requirements have been met for this sample delivery group (SDG).
CRDL Requirements
All CRDL standard(s) met the referenced advisory control limits.
ICSAJICSAB Statement
All interference check samples (ICSA and ICSAB) associated withthis SDG met the established
acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Blank (CCB) Requirements
All continuing calibration blanks (CCB) bracketing this batch met the established acceptance
criteria.
Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) Requirements
All continuing calibration verifications (CCV) bracketing this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Quality Control (QC) Information
Method Blank (MB) Statement
The MBs analyzed with this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Recovery
The LCS spike recoveries met the acceptance limits.
Quality Control (QC) Sample Statement
The following samples were selected as the quality control (QC) samples for this SDG:
316260001 (MW-65_10232012)-ICP and 316273001 (Eff)-ICP-MS.
Matrix Spike (MS) Recovery Statement
The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the MS analyses are evaluated when the sample
concentration is less than four times (4X) the spike concentration added. All applicable elements
met the acceptance criteria.
Duplicate Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The RPD obtained from the designated sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated based on acceptance
criteria of 20% when the sample is >5X the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases
where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control of +I-RL is used to
evaluate the DUP results. All applicable analytes met these requirements.
Serial Dilution % Difference Statement
The serial dilution is used to assess matrix suppression or enhancement. Raw element
concentrations that are 25X the IDL/MDL for CVAA, 50X the IDL/MDL for ICP, and 100X the
IDL/MDL for ICP-MS analyses are applicable for serial dilution assessment. All applicable
analytes met the acceptance criteria of less than 10% difference (%D).
Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Recovery Statement
The percent recovery (%R) obtained from the MSD analyses are evaluated when the sample
concentration is less than four time (4X) the spike concentration added. All applicable elements
met the acceptance criteria.
MS/MSD Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The RPD(s) between the MS and MSD met the acceptance limits.
Technical Information
Holding Time Specifications
GEL assigns holding times based on the associated methodology, which assigns the date and
time from sample collection of sample receipt. Those holding times expressed in hours are
calculated in the AlphaLIMS system. Those holding times expressed as days expire at midnight
on the day of expiration. All samples in this SDG met the specified holding time.
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
All procedures were performed as stated in the SOP.
Sample Dilutions
Dilutions are performed to minimize matrix interferences resulting from elevated mineral
element concentrations present in solid samples and/or to bring over range target analyte
concentrations into the linear calibration range of the instrument. The samples in this SDG did
not require dilutions.
Preparatio~ Information
The samples in this SDG were prepared exactly according to the cited SOP.
Miscellaneous Information
Electronic Packaging Comment
This data package was generated using an electronic data processing program referred to as
virtual packaging. In an effort to increase quality and efficiency, the laboratory has developed
systems to generate all data packages electronically. The following change from traditional
packages should be noted:
Analyst/peer reviewer initials and dates are not present on the electronic data files. Presently, all
initials and dates are present on the original raw data. These hard copies are temporarily stored in
the laboratory. An electronic signature page inserted after the case narrative will include the data
validator's signature and title. The signature page also includes the data qualifiers used in the
fractional package. Data that are not generated electronically, such as hand written pages, will be
scanned and inserted into the electronic package.
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports (DERs) are generated to document procedural anomalies that may deviate
from referenced SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not
generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this SDG.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has
met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case
narrative.
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data
designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion
of the data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
Reviewer: ~~ate:_"""",,2'T-ls~I..J-'3f--_____ _
\
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis Report
for
DNMIOO 1 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 316260 GEL Work Order: 316260
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
* * Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL
U Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
The designation ND, ifpresent, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above
the limit as defined in the 'U' qualifier above.
This datareport has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC
standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Heather Shaffer.
Reviewed by
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary Reoort Date: February 5, 2013 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page lof 3 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 316260
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
\1etals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1268450
QC1202792101 316273001 DUP
Selenium 17.2 18.9 ug/L 9.44 /\ (+1-5.00) SKJ 12112112 04: 1
Thallium U 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L N/A
Uranium 0.091 U 0.300 ug/L (+1-0.200) PRB 12114112 17: 5·
QC1202792100 LCS
Selenium 50.0 53.0 ug/L 106 (85%-115%) SKJ 1211211203:4
Thallium 50.0 47.0 ug/L 94 (85%-115%)
Uranium 50.0 52.1 ug/L 104 (85%-115%) PRB 12114112 17:3
QC1202792099 MB
Selenium U 5.00 ug/L SKJ 1211211203:3
Thallium U 0.500 ug/L
Uranium U 0.300 ug/L PRB 12114112 17:3
QC 12027921 02 316273001 MS
Selenium 50.0 17.2 76.3 ug/L 118 (75%-125%) SKJ 12112112 04: 1 '
Thallium 50.0 U 0.500 43.6 ug/L 87.2 (75%-125%)
Uranium 50.0 0.091 57.0 ug/L (75%-125%) PRB 12114112 17:5
QC 12027921 04 316273001 MSD
Selenium 50.0 17.2 73.4 ug/L 3.93 112 (0%-20%) SKJ 1211211204:2
Thallium 50.0 U 0.500 43.4 ug/L 0.561 86.7 (0%-20%)
Uranium 50.0 0.091 55.8 ug/L 2.15 (0%-20%) PRB 12114112 18:0
QC1202792103 316273001 SDILT
Selenium 17.2 U 7.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) SKJ 1211211204:3
Thallium U 0.625 U 0.625 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Uranium 0.091 U 0.335 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) PRB 12114/12 18:0·
\1etals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1268448
QC1202792096 316260001 DUP
Manganese 248 247 ug/L 0.352 (0%-20%) JWJ 12114112 21:0
QC1202792095 LCS
Manganese 500 500 ug/L 100 (85%-115%) 12114112 21:0
QC 1202792094 MB
Manganese U 10.0 ug/L 1211411220:5
QC1202792097 316260001 MS
Manganese 500 248 696 ug/L 89.7 (75%-125%) 12114112 21 : 11
QC1202792098 316260001 SDILT
Manganese 248 51.5 ug/L 3.94 (0%-10%) 12114112 21 : 1.
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 316260 Page 2 of 3
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
< Result is less than value reported
> Result is greater than value reported
A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
B For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
C Analyte has been confirmed by GCIMS analysis
D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
E Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 1 0%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
F Estimated Value
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H Analytical holding time was exceeded
K Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
L Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M M if above MDC and less than LLD
M Matrix Related Failure
N Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
N/ A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl
ND
NJ
Q
R
V
V
VI
VJ
UL
X
Y
/\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 316260 Page 3 of 3
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
N/ A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Method/Analysis Information
Product:
Analytical Method:
Analytical Batch Number:
Sample ID
316260001
1202792338
1202792339
1202792340
1202792341
1202792342
Radiochemistry Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG316260
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
EPA 900.1 Modified
1268531
Client ID
MW-65 10232012
Method Blank (MB)
316260001 (MW -65 _10232012) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
316260001(MW-65_10232012) Matrix Spike (MS)
316260001(MW-65 _10232012) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-RAD-A-OI0 REV# 14.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information
All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information
Standard solutions for these analysis are NIST traceable or verified with a NIST traceable standard and used
before the expiration dates.
Sample Geometry
All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Ouality Control lOC) Information:
Blank Information
The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 316260001 (MW-65_10232012).
QC Information
All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Chemical Recoveries
All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMI001 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 316260 GEL Work Order: 316260
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
Review IValidation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: ~ Name: Kate Gellatly
\
Date: 12 DEC 2012 Title: Analyst I
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 316260
Parmname NOM
Rad Gas Flow
Batch 1268531
QC1202792339 316260001 DUP
Gross Radium Alpha
Uncertainty
QC1202792342 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha 556
Uncertainty
QC1202792338 MB
Gross Radium Alpha
Uncertainty
QC1202792340 316260001 MS
Gross Radium Alpha 568
Uncertainty
QC1202792341 316260001 MSD
Gross Radium Alpha 568
Uncertainty
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
QC Summarl:
Sample Qual QC Units RPD%
5.84 4.79 pCilL 19.8
+/-0.706 +/-0.652
589 pCi/L
+/-7.38
U 1.00 pCiIL
+/-0.0876
5.84 605 pCilL
+/-0.706 +/-7.18
5.84 585 pCi/L 3.42
+/-0.706 +/-6.93
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
Estimated Value
ReDort Date: December 12, 2012
Page lof 2
REC% Range Anlst-
(0% -20%) KDFI
106 (75%-125%)
106 (75%-125%)
102 (0%-20%)
Date Ti
12/08/12 1
12/08112 1
12/08112 1
12/08112 1
12/08/12 1
A
B
BD
C
D
E
F
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H
K
L
M
M
N
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Matrix Related Failure
Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 316260 Page 2 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst
NI A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nt
ND
NJ
Q
R
U
UI
UJ
UL
X
Y
/\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
Date Ti
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater tha
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +1-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result. .
* Indicates.that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
TabF2
Laboratory Analytical Reports-Accelerated Monitoring
December 2012
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Recei ve Date:
Collector:
MVV-ll 12242012
317317001
Ground VV ater
24-DEC-12 11 :05
28-DEC-12
Client
Qualifier Result
vletals Analysis-ICP
!OO.21200.7 Manganese ''As Received"
vianganese 137
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.7
SRL CRDL
10.0 10.0
Analyst
BXA1
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: February 5,2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
317317
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
ug/L 1 LS 12/31/12 11 :47 1273046 1
Date Time Prep Batch
12/31/12 0157 1273045
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. \\Then the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
>arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
MVV-14 12182012
317215001
Ground VV ater
18-DEC-12 10:40
24-DEC-12
Client
Qualifier Result
~etals Analysis-ICP
~OO.2/200. 7 Manganese ''As Received"
v1anganese 1950
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2 ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.7
SRL CRDL
10.0 10.0
Analyst
BXAI
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: February 5, 2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
317215
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
uglL 1 LS 12127112 11:36 1272611 1
Date Time Prep Batch
12/26112 1833 1272610
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. VVhen the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-25 12242012
Lab Sample ID: 317317002
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 24-DEC-12 10:45
Receive Date: 28-DEC-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
vIetals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.21200.8 Uranium ''As Received"
Jranium 4.83
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.8
SRL CRDL
0.300 0.300
Analyst
BXAI
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: February 5, 2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
317317
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
ug/L 1 RMJ 01/04113 02:31 1273044 1
Date Time Prep Batch
12/31112 0200 1273043
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mai1: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: December Monthly GW 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1212580-001
Client Sample ID: MW-26_12242012
Collection Date: 12/24/2012 1345h
Received Date: 12/28/2012 0955h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 12/31/2012 1651h E300.0 10.0 65.9
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 11312013 2010h E353.2 0.100 1.46
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 5 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
o"hOM",,,"t "01' "fthp "a",,, "f thi. c,o",nanv or anv memher of its staff. or reoroduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICAl. LA B ORATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
;:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: December Monthly GW 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1212580-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-26_12242012
Collection Date: 12124/2012 1345h
Received Date: 12/28/2012 0955h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
Analyzed: 12/28/2012 1239h
Units: ~g/L Dilution Factor: 20 Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Compound Number Limit Result Qual
Chloroform 67-66-3 20.0 1,250
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 17060-07-0 1,040 1,000 104 72-151
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 1,070 1,000 107 80-128
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane 1868-53-7 1,040 1,000 104 80-124
SUIT: Toluene-d8 2037-26-5 1,020 1,000 102 77-129
~ -The reporting limits were raised due to high analyte concentrations.
Analyzed: 12/28/2012 1118h
Units: ~g/L Dilution Factor: Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Compound Number Limit Result Qual
2-Butanone 78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
Acetone 67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
Benzene 71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
Chloromethane 74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 1.00 5.50
Naphthalene 91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 . 1.00 < 1.00
Toluene 108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
Xylenes, Total 1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 17060-07-0 50.1 50.00 100 72-151
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 52.9 50.00 106 80-128
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane 1868-53-7 51.0 50.00 102 80-124
SUIT: Toluene-d8 2037-26-5 50.4 50.00 101 77-129
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 8 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
onhopnnpnt nop of thp n.lnp. of this c.nlnnanv or anv memher of it~ staff. or reoroduction of this renort in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
>arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-26 12242012
Lab Sample ID: 317317003
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: 24-DEC-12 13:45
Receive Date: 28-DEC-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
~etals Analysis-ICP-MS
~OO.2/200.8 Uranium ''As Received"
Jranium 51.3
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.8
SRL CRDL
0.300 0.300
Analyst
BXA1
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: February 5, 2013
DNMI00100
DNMI001
317317
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
ug/L 1 RMJ 01 /04/13 03:00 1273044 1
Date Time Prep Batch
12/31112 0200 1273043
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
American West
ANALYTICAL LAB ORATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: December Monthly GW 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1212580-002
Client Sample ID: MW-30_12262012
Collection Date: 12/26/2012 1105h
Received Date: 12/28/2012 0955h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
12/3112012 1758h E300.0 100
113/2013 2028h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
122
17.2
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 6 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
~lIhseauent llse of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
>arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address : 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-30 12262012
Lab Sample ID: 317317004
Matrix: Ground Water
Collect Date: ') 26-DEC-1211:05
Receive Date: 28-DEC-12
Collector: Client
Qualifier Result
~etals Analysis-ICP-MS
~OO.2/200.8 Selenium ''As Received"
;e1enium 31.6
5.80 Jranium
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.8
SRL
5.00
0.300
CRDL
5.00 '
0.300
Analyst
BXA1
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: February 5,2013
DNMI00100
DNMIOOI
317317
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Date
ug/L
ug/L
12/31/12
RMJ 01104/13 03:04 1273044 1
Time Prep Batch
0200 1273043
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is ·the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: December Monthly Groundwater 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1212473-001
Client Sample ID: MW-31_ 12182012
Collection Date: 12/1812012 1350h
Received Date: 12/2112012 1030h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Chloride mg/L 12/3112012 1329h E300.0 100
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 1212712012 1821h E353.2 10.0
Sulfate mg/L 12/25/2012 0151h E300.0 100
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 1212112012 1450h SM2540C 20.0
I _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix inteiference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Analytical
Result Qual
170
22.2
664
1,270
Report Date: 1/2/2013 Page 4 of 9
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
<llh<"'Oll",nt ll<e nfthe name ,)f this comnanv or anv member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
>arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Project:
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
MW-35 12182012
317215002
Ground Water
18-DEC-12 14:40
24-DEC-12
Client
Qualifier Result
vIetals Analysis-ICP
100.21200.7 Manganese ''As Received"
vianganese
vIetals Analysis-ICP-MS
100.21200.8 Thallium ''As Received"
;elenium
lhallium
Jranium
240
12.1
0.500
21.0
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2
EPA 200.2
ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
ICP-TRACE 200.2 Liquid Prep
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
1
2
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.8
SRL
10.0
5.00
0.500
0.300
CRDL
10.0
5.00
0.500
0.300
Analyst
BXAI
BXAI
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: February 5, 2013
DNMIOOI00
DNMIOOI
317215
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Date
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
12/26112
12/26112
1 LS 12/27112 11:47 1272611 1
SKJ 12/27/12 22:49 1272613 2
Time Prep Batch
1839
1833
1272612
1272610
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: January 7, 2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Project: White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID: MW-35 12182012
Sample ID: 317215002
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Ground Water
18-DEC-1214:40
24-DEC-12
Client Collector:
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Gross Radium Alpha 6.50 +/-0.864
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
DL
0.993
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCilL KDFI 01103/13 1109 1272722
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
95.7 (25%-125%)
American West ANALYTI CAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: December Monthly GW 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1212580-004
Client Sample ID: MW-65_12262012
Collection Date: 12/2612012 1105h
Received Date: 12/2812012 0955h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mgiL
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
12/3112012 1842h E300.0 10.0
113/2013 2030h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
130
17.9
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 7 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
cnhc,"nn"nt nc" nfth,. n"",,. nfthi. comn.nv or .nv mpmh"r of its st.ff or renrnoll"tinn nfthis r"nnrt in "n""""tinn with the advertisement. oromotion or sale of anv oroduct or orocess. or in connection with the re-oublication of this re ort for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
)arameter
Company: Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Address: 225 Union Boulevard
Contact:
Project:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Client Sample ID:
Lab Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
MVV-65 12262012
317317005
Ground VV ater
26-DEC-1211:05
28-DEC-12
Client
Qualifier Result
vIetals Analysis-ICP-MS
WO.21200.8 Selenium "As Received"
;elenium 34.5
6.40 Jranium
The following Prep Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.2 ICP-MS 200.2 PREP
The following Analytical Methods were performed
Method Description
EPA 200.8
SRL
5.00
0.300
CRDL
5.00
0.300
Analyst
BXAI
Proiect:
Client ID:
Client SDG:
Report Date: February 5, 2013
DNMIOOIOO
DNMIOOI
317317
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
Date
ug/L
ug/L
12/31 /12
RMJ 01104/13 03:08 1273044 1
Time Prep Batch
0200 1273043
Analyst Comments
SRL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. \\Then the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which
is the greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
American West
ANA L YTICAL LABOAATORIfS
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
;:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
December Monthly GW 2012
1212580-003A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 12/2412012
Received Date: 12/2812012 0955h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/S030C
Analyzed: 12/28/2012 1137h
Units: /-lg/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: Toluene-d8
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
17060-07-0 50.8 50.00 102
460-00-4 52.3 50.00 105
1868-53-7 49.9 50.00 99.8
2037-26-5 49.6 50.00 99.2
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
<1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Report Date: 1/812013 Page 9 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
cnhcp""pnt "op "ftnp n.mp "ftn;. r.omn.nv or .nv ",,,mh"f of it •• t.ff Of mnronnction of this renort in connection with the advertisement. oromotion or sale of any oroduct or orocess. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: December Monthly Groundwater 2012
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ill: 1212473
American West Analytical Laboratories received 1 sample(s) on 12/2112012 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Association Conference (NELAC) Institute in Utah and Texas;
and is state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri. In addition,
A W AL is also accredited by the American Analytical Laboratory Association (A2LA) on
ISO IEC 17025:2005, Department of Defense (DOD), UST for the State of Wyoming, and
the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). All analyses were
performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute andlor A2LA protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
This is a revision to a report originally issued 1/2/2013. Pages 1, 3, 8, and 9 have been
revised.
Thank You, Ky I e F. Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
ON: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G email=[e-mail]. c=US r 0 S S Date: 2013.01 .17 15:36:26 -07'00'
Approved by: ~ ______________________ ~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 1/17/2013 Page 1 of9
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of .
...... 1.. ....... ", .................. .,. ",""kG ................... ,....f't'h;c .... " ........ T'\':lo~" ",.. 'JI"" ""'1"'''''''''''''''''' f'\.f;t~ ct'JIff nr TPnrn('h, .... tin" "fth;(;' rpnnrt in rnnnpf't;nn with thp ~rlvprti~pm,...nt nrnmntinn or ~~1p: "f ~nv nrnnll('.t or nr()r.p;~s or 1n (':onnf":r:tion with the: rf":-n11hl1c:lt1on of this r n n
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
December Monthly Groundwater 2012
1212473
Date Received: 12/2112012 1030h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
1212473-001A MW-31 12182012
1212473-001B MW-31 12182012
1212473-001C MW-31 12182012
Date Collected
12/18/2012 1350h
12/18/2012 1350h
12/18/2012 1350h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Matrix
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Analysis
Anions, E300.0
Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 112/2013 Page 2 of 9
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
...... t... ... ,. .... n .... _ .. ,. ... .,. ,...f't .... "" ................ .,. "f'th;(' ..... """'T'Hln'H m' 'l"" ,"",p,.,.,l","r ".fit" d!lff (w rpnT"nnll('ttnn nfthic;: rpnnrt 1n rnnnpdion with the: ~rlvp:rtisement_ nromotion or sale of any nrociuct or nrocess. or in connection with the re-oublication of this reoort for any
)
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Revised Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
December Monthly Groundwater 2012
1212473
12/2112012
12/2112012
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
sample was performed within the method holding times. The sample was properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The sample was analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicates (MSIMSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions: The MS and MSD percent recoveries for nitrate/nitrite on
sample 1212473-001C were outside of control limits on nitrate/nitrite due to sample
matrix interference.
Duplicate (DUP): The parameters that required a duplicate analysis had RPDs
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 1117/2013 Page 3 of 9
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached' COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
... Hl.. ........ n .. ""n ........ 0 "f"t'ho "'1''''''"" ",f'tl,;c rrU.,..,T\';iIn" AT" 'l"" n"Iprnhpr nf;tl:;' IO:bff or TPnrrvfnrtinn nfthl<: Tf"nnrt ;n ('.nnnpr.ttnn with thp. ::tnvf';rtisement. nromntinn or sale of anv nrorluct or nrocess. or in connection with the re-oublication of this reo art for any
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212473
Project: December Monthly Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1212473-001BDUP Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
mglL SM2540C
Result
1,290
Amount
Spiked
Dept: WC
QC Type: DUP
Original
Amount
1,272
%REC Limits %RPD
1.25
RPD
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Limit Qual Date Analyzed
5 12/2112012 1450h
Report Date: 1/2/2013 Page 5 of 9
maJyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infOlmation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
lber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212473
Project: December Monthly Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS-R48812 Sulfate
LCS-R48943 Chloride
LCS-R48869 NitratelNitrite (as N)
LCS-R48771 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web:www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 4.66 5.000 0 93.3 90-110
mg/L E300.0 4.95 5.000 0 . 98.9 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.09 1.000 0 109 90-110
mg/L SM2540C 194 205.0 0 94.6 80-120
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/24/2012 1207h
12/3112012 1307h
1212712012 1820h
12/2112012 1450h
Report Date: 1/2/2013 Page 6 of 9
nalyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
ber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABOR/,TOR I ES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212473
Project: December Monthly Groundwater 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB-R48812 Sulfate
MB-R48943 Chloride
MB-R48869 NitrateINitrite (as N)
MB-R48771 Total Dissolved Solids
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mglL E300.0 < 1.00
mglL E300.0 < 1.00
mglL E353.2 <0.100
mglL SM2540C < 10.0
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/24/2012 1145h
12/3112012 1245h
12127/2012 1819h
1212112012 1450h
Report Date: 112/2013 Page 7 of 9
nalyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
~ber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212473
Project: December Monthly Groundwater 2012
Sample ID
1212473-001AMS
1212473-001 AMS
1212473-001CMS
Analyte
Sulfate
Chloride
NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 5,750 5,000 664.0 102 90-110
mglL E300.0 4,820 5,000 169.9 93 .1 90-110
mg/L E353.2 133 100.0 22.19 111 90-110
1 _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/25/2012 0213h
12/31/2012 1351h
12/27/2012 1827h
Report Date: 1/17/2013 Page 8 of 9
analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
ber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the fe-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
~
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1212473
Project: December Monthly Groundwater 2012
Sample ID
1212473-001AMSD
1212473-001AMSD
1212473-001CMSD
Analyte
Sulfate
Chloride
NitratelNitrite (as N)
Units Method Result
mglL E300.0 5,660
mg/L E300.0 4,820
mglL E353.2 140
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the Les.
Dept: WC
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Spiked Amount %REC
5,000 664.0 99.9
5,000 169.9 92.9
100.0 22.l9 118
Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
RPD
%RPD Limit
1.64 20
0.111 20
4.72 10
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/25/2012 0235h
12/31/2012 1414h
12/27/2012 1828h
Report Date: 1/17/2013 Page 9 of 9
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
ber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West Analytical Laboratories
WORK ORDER Summary
Client:
Client ID:
Project:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
DEN100
December Monthly Groundwater 2012
Contact: Garrin Palmer
QC Level: LEVEL III
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 & Summary. Project specific DL's: see COCo EDD-Denison. Email Group.;
SampleID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due
1212473-001A MW-31_12182012 12/18/2012 1350h 12/21120121030h 113/2013
SEL Analytes: CL S04
1212473-00lB
SEL Analytes: TDS
1212473-001C
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M ~ RT CN~ TAT 0/ QC HO
Matrix
Aqueous
UL
Denison
Worl{Order: 1212473
Page 1 of 1 12/2112012
WO Type: Project
Test Code Sel Storage
300.0-W ~ df-we
TDS-W -2540C ~ ww -tds
N02/N03-W-~ df -
353.2 Do2/no3 &
nh3
HO~ COC Emailed=..ll « 7 -'"t
Client Eoec?b :'Fu.e.\<::>
Address 61..\ 25 ~ HW:6 I ~ t
BtMJ.\f\~ tA"\ __ ~YS1/
City ~ State Zip
Phone '135 '78 2.2.2,.\ Fax ______ _
Contact G=w6~ Pu..\ms/
E-mail ~~W\~ener6j~~''-o~
Project Name p~ MD"~ t,..~~ ~1'2
Project Number/P.O.# ___ ~ ______ _
Sampler Name -1';,tjcf »Dl/~'o/
w
DatelTime
Collected
AMERICAN
WEST CHAIN OF
CUSTODY ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES [phone]
[phone]
SaltLake City, Utah Fax [phone]
463 West 3600 South
84115 Email:[e-mail]
TESTS REQUIRED
~ ~ t::. "fT.:
i ~ t
'iii <... A ~ § ~ k--'~
x ~ ~. III t f'~ ',; 'c.... ~ 1...1""''''
co.o ~ ..r..
Lab Sample Set # /2.12-.. /.j j-},
Page i of! ----
Tum Around Time (Circle One) ~
1 day 2 day 3 day 4 day 5 daGd~
QC LEVEL
1 2 2+
l1> 3+ 4
LABORATORY USE ONLY
S~SWERE:
1 IShippedOr hand delivered
Notes: Jvt p S
2 Ambient or6hii{ed>
Notes: ("--/
~ IQ.
3 Temperature H ..... en c,o; -1-~5 ~ r ;:.j Sample ID . z <. J) COMMENTS 114 Received Broken/Leaking
: . (Improperly sea7:J-\ MW -~L,.12l&'2.ol~_ -___________ ~~ __________ ~lg/J~ j~ y..) 3. .~. _'1-_',£1 --_ J ~otes: G
5 ~r perJy Preserved Y N ~~------------------------------------------4--------------f--t-~--t--i--~--t--1---r--;---t--1---r-----------------111 e~ed&Bench
Y N
Notes:
6 Received Within
(9'01 I Times
Y N
Note ,
COC Tape Was: ~--------------------------------~----------r-~~~~~--+-~-+~~~~~------------~II
Relinquished By: Signature Date
PRINT NAME Time
Relinquished By: Signature I Date
PRINT NAME I Time
Relinquished By: Signature I Date
PRINTNAME I Time
Received By: Signature Date II Special Instructions:
PRINT NAME Time
Received By: Signature Date
PRINT NAME Time
1 Present on Outer
~age
0 N
2 UnbrOken on Outer ~ac'fage UN
NA
NA
3 Present on Sample r;;I
Y N e
II Kecelveo tjy: ;:;/gnarure I uate " 'I I i4 Unbroken on Sample ~: h_ i_ i Y N ~
II PRINT NAME Discrepancies Between
Sample labels andc;) C Record?
Y N
Notes:
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TOX
. TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
Preservative All '-1''''''1''' ~'
OK I
pH <2 I-hS04
pH <2 H2SO4
PH>12 NaOH
pH <2 HN03
pH <2 H2SO4 y'~
pH <2 H2SO4 17
pH <2 HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH>9NaOH,
Z11 Acetate
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H3P04
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 HCL
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
00 Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
.--'--"""'fl' t:.xc-ept Ex _I'" c.
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
Sample Set: /~ /~ '173
I..R" '-1''''-'1''' I::.xcepr -CJ<,\,;t:jJl eXCepl ' ~
Ij Ivtltv
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awa1-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: December Monthly GW 2012
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ill: 1212580
American West Analytical Laboratories received 4 sample(s) on 12/28/2012 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Association Conference (NELAC) Institute in Utah and Texas;
and is state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri. In addition,
A W AL is also accredited by the American Analytical Laboratory Association (A2LA) on
ISO IEC 17025:2005, Department of Defense (DOD), UST for the State of Wyoming, and
the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). All analyses were
performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute and/or A2LA protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation documents are available upon request. If you have·any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
1""1 Ky I e F. Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
DN: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G email=[e-mail]. c=US r 0 S S Date:-2013.01.08 16:05:24 -OTOO'
Approved by: ~ ______________________ ~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 118/2013 Page 1 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
<l1h<pn11p.nt 11<" of the name of this comnanv or anv member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of ~is. report for any
American West Client:
ANA LYTICAL LABORATORIES Project:
Lab Set ID:
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
December Monthly GW 2012
1212580
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Received: 12/28/20120955h
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
1212580-001A MW-26 12242012
1212580-001B MW-26 12242012
1212580-001C MW-26 12242012
1212580-002A MW-30 12262012
1212580-002B MW-30 12262012
1212580-003A Trip Blank
1212580-004A MW-65 12262012
1212580-004B MW-65 12262012
Date Collected Matrix Analysis
12/24/2012 1345h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
12/24/2012 1345h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
12/24/2012 1345h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
12/26/2012 1105h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
12/26/2012 1105h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
12/24/2012 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
12/26/2012 1105h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
12/26/2012 1105h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 2 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SOW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
, .. --_c.,. --_._-_c.1.'" "n~_"_ .. n. on .. ~~m1.~. nfit< <toff nr rpnrrvlnrti"n "fthi. r"nort in "onn"ction with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any .
Inorganic Case Narrative
American West Client: ANALY T ICAL LABORAT ORIES Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
December Monthly GW 2012
1212580
12/28/2012
12/24 & 12/26/2012
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation for the
samples were performed within the method holding times. The samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD~ DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicates (MSIMSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions: The MS and MSD percent recoveries were outside of control
limits on nitratelnitrite for sample 1212580-001C due to sample matrix interference.
Duplicate (DUP): The parameters that required a duplicate analysis had RPDs
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 3 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SOW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive lise of the addressee. Privileges of
o"hoM n,,"' nop "fth" n0111o> "fthi. r."mn"nV or "nV memher ofit~ staff. or reoroduction ofthis reoort in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
Volatile Case Narrative
American West Client: ANALY TiCAL LABORATORIES Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
December Monthly GW 2012
1212580
12/28/2012
12/24 & 12/26/2012
Intact
None
SW -846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: Multiple target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
--->
Report Date: 1/812013 Page 4 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in a.ccordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
."\-,.pn,,pn' "op "ft\-'p ""mp "f'hi< ~"n1n"nv nr "nv mf'mh.er of ito otoff or renrooll"tion ofthis renort in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORi ES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212580
Project:
Sample ID
LCS-R48975
LCS-R49056
December Monthly GW 2012
Analyte
Chloride
NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 4.95 5.000 0 98.9 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.01 1.000 0 101 90-110
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/31/2012 1307h
1/3/2013 2000h
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 10 of 17
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATOR IES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212580
Project:
Sample ID
MB-R48975
MB-R49056
December Monthly GW 2012
Analyte
Chloride
NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00
mgiL E353.2 < 0.100
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/3112012 1245h
1/3/2013 1955h
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 11 of 17
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
ber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the adveliisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212580
Project: December Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1212580-001BMS Chloride
1212580-001CMS N03 NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 593 500.0 65.88 105 90-110
E353.2 12.8 10.00 1.457 113 90-110
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/3112012 1713h
113/2013 2020h
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 12 of 17
nalyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
ber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212580
Project: December Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1212580-001BMSD Chloride
1212580-001CMSD N03 NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
OC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units
mgIL
mgIL
Method
E300.0
E353.2
Result
571
12.6
Amount
Spiked
500.0
10.00
Dept: WC
QC Type: MSD
Original
Amount
65.88
1.457
%REC
101
112
Limits
90-110
90-110
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
%RPD
3.72
0.889
RPD
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Limit Qual Date Analyzed
20
10
12/31/2012 1735h
1/3/2013 2021 h
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 13 of 17
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
ber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYtiCAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212580
Project: December Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS VOC 122812A Benzene
LCS VOC 122812A Chloroform
LCS VOC 122812A Methylene chloride
LCS VOC 122812A Naphthalene
LCS VOC 122812A Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 122812A Toluene
LCS VOC 122812A Xylenes, Total
LCS VOC 122812A SUIT: 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
LCS VOC 122812A SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 122812A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 122812A SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, ur 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (801) 263:8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
~glL SW8260C 22.3 20.00 0 112 62-127
~glL SW8260C 21.0 20.00 0 105 67-132
~glL SW8260C 21.9 20.00 0 110 32-185
~glL SW8260C 19.1 20.00 0 95.5 28-136
~glL SW8260C 15.1 20.00 0 75.4 43-146
~glL SW8260C 22.4 20.00 0 112 64-128
~glL SW8260C 65.8 60.00 0 110 52-134
%REC SW8260C 46.3 50.00 92.6 76-138
%REC SW8260C 49.8 50.00 99.5 77-121
%REC SW8260C 48:6 50.00 97.3 67-128
%REC SW8260C 49.2 50.00 98.4 81-135
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1212812012 1018h
12/28/2012 1018h
1212812012 1018h
1212812012 1018h
1212812012 1018h
1212812012 1018h
1212812012 1018h
12128/20121018h
12128/2012 1018h
12/2812012 1018h
12/28/2012 1018h
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 14 of 17
analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
ber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATOR IES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212580
Project: December Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 122812A 2-Butanone
MB VOC 122812A Acetone
MB VOC 122812A Benzene
MB VOC 122812A Carbon tetrachloride
MB VOC 122812A Chloroform
MB VOC 122812A Chloromethane
MB VOC 122812A Methylene chloride
MB VOC 122812A Naphthalene
MB VOC 122812A Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 122812A Toluene
MB VOC 122812A Xylenes, Total
MB VOC 122812A SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 122812A SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 122812A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 122812A SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlglL SW8260C <20.0
IlglL SW8260C <20.0
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
IlglL SW8260C < 1.00
%REC SW8260C 49.5 50.00 99.1 76-138
%REC SW8260C 52.0 50.00 104 77-121
%REC SW8260C 49.6 50.00 99.2 67-128
%REC SW8260C 50.2 50.00 100 81-135
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12128/2012 1056h
1212812012 1056h
1212812012 1056h
1212812012 1056h
1212812012 1056h
1212812012 1056h
1212812012 1056h
1212812012 1056h
12/28/2012 1056h
1212812012 1056h
12128/2012 1056h
12/28/2012 1056h
12128/2012 1056h
12/28/2012 1056h
1212812012 1056h
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 15 of 17
analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTI CAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212580
Project: December Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1212580-001AMS Benzene
1212580-001AMS Chloroform
1212580-00 lAMS Methylene chloride
1212580-001AMS Naphthalene
1212580-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
1212580-001AMS Toluene
1212580-001AMS Xylenes, Total
1212580-001AMS Surr: 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1212580-001AMS Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1212580-001AMS Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
1212580-001AMS Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlglL SW8260C 403 400.0 0 101 66-145
IlglL SW8260C 1,650 400.0 1,248 99.9 50-146
IlglL SW8260C 433 400.0 5.500 107 30-192
IlglL SW8260C 336 400.0 0 84.0 41-131
IlglL SW8260C 357 400.0 0 89.3 43-146
IlglL SW8260C 393 400.0 0 98.3 18-192
IlglL SW8260C 1,180 1,200 0 98.0 42-167
%REC SW8260C 1,060 1,000 106 72-151
%REC SW8260C 1,030 1,000 103 80-128
%REC SW8260C 1,050 1,000 105 80-124
%REC SW8260C 996 1,000 99.6 77-129
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1212812012 1258h
1212812012 1258h
1212812012 1258h
12/2812012 1258h
12/2812012 1258h
12/28/2012 1258h
1212812012 1258h
1212812012 1258h
12/28/2012 1258h
1212812012 1258h
12/2812012 1258h
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 16 of 17
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
ber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORi ES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1212580
Project: December Monthly GW 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1212580-001AMSD Benzene
1212580-001AMSD Chloroform
1212580-001AMSD Methylene chloride
1212580-001AMSD Naphthalene
1212580-001AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
1212580-001AMSD Toluene
1212580-001 AMSD Xylenes, Total
1212580-001 AMSD Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1212580-001AMSD SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1212580-001 AMSD SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1212580-001 AMSD SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80l) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
~c SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlglL SW8260C 389 400.0 0 97.2 66-145
IlglL SW8260C 1,610 400.0 1,248 91.5 50-146
IlglL SW8260C 424 400.0 5.500 105 30-192
IlglL SW8260C 326 400.0 0 81.5 41-131
IlglL SW8260C 358 400.0 0 89.4 43-146
IlglL SW8260C 380 400.0 0 95.0 18-192
IlglL SW8260C 1,120 1,200 0 93.6 42-167
%REC SW8260C 1,050 1,000 105 72-151
%REC SW8260C 975 1,000 97.5 80-128
%REC SW8260C 1,050 1,000 105 80-124
%REC SW8260C 983 1,000 98.3 77-129
RPD
%RPD Limit
3.49 25
2.05 25
2.05 25
2.96 25
0.112 25
3.47 25
4.65 25
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
12/28/2012 1317h
12/28/2012 1317h
12/28/2012 1317h
12/28/2012 1317h
12/28/2012 1317h
12/28/2012 1317h
12/28/2012 1317h
12/28/2012 1317h
12/28/2012 1317h
12/28/2012 1317h
12/28/2012 1317h
Report Date: 1/8/2013 Page 17 of 17
analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
ber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M ff RT ~ CN ~ TAT ~ QC c:r---HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ COC Emailed /2./?-.Wk ~
Client £'V\.e,r-c:..y (:"9'-. Ls
Address 6a..t 2-=5 S ,. H LJi i q I
gi~,i"\-A 0\ gioJSi t
AMERICAN CHAIN OF Lab Sample Set # /2. 11.. )~ WEST
ANALYTICAL CUSTODY . Page I of I LABORATORIES [phone]
Tum Around Time (Circle One) e 463 West 3600 South [phone]
Salt Lake City, Utah Fax [phone] day 2 day 3 day 4 day 5 day tandard 84115 Email:[e-mail]
City ~ State Zip
Phone ~3S &'7r :6AAl Fax. ______ _
Gc...rr-\.A ..P~l~ -------------~e.r TESTS REQUIRED QC LEVEL LABORATORY USE ONLY E-mail .&l pc ..... l~ e e-A.~ y Eve..t;-e ~Q6 J: SAMIOI CQ-tAleRE:
Project Name C> ?Le,....Aber fr'\p1'\.,J..k \y Gw ~oia.. 'iij 1 ~and derlYl!l'ed @. ~i: 1 2 2+ -+ otes: U f? :5'
Project Number/P.O.# ~ ~ OatelTime :g
~ 6) -McA t; J.co/ Collected ~ -\-. 3+ 4 2 Ambient orE)
Sampler Name I ,:,...."",A-I-I --6 Notes: u ~ r >< '0 ·'C
3 Temperature 2--2--"t: 1 0 -c! ~ CO i.-J Sample ID ~ :J ,t !J COMMENTS z
':ca s oJ 4 Received Broken/Leaking
-;iiiiiiiJ!i (Improperly se~
A Y N
Notes:
M LJ -U _ i 2..:l"l :2t'> I Q J!lI.:l~1 1:2.. 1.:3Lf5 5 ~ ~' )( ~IY Preserved tJ Y N
M W -30_1~,?.c>1P-:J-)< ><
C ed at Bench
'1-'2hh2 lu'5 I,J N
Notes: arr ,-" Bir. Ak' iLl fl"",112 X'"
T e,VV\P BLILA \( I2..JUI'2 ~
JV\W-65_1.2Ua.Ot2 19..1:1..&//2 , 11).5" >< 7<-6 Received Within
~ngTimes Y . N
No s:
coe Tape Was:
1 Present on Outer
~ckage Relinquished By: Signature P,)AA_ Date Received By: Signature Date Special Instructions: Y N NA &~ I ;).L2.hII~
PRINT NAME {; , PA.l~ Tim~j PRINT NAME Time 2 Unbroken on Outer
f~f"r-\A I 00 c:rgO
Y N NA
Relinquished By; Signature Date Received By: Signature Date
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME Time
3 Present on Sample ~
Y N NA
Relinquished By: Signature Date Received By: Signature Date Y N NA
4 Unbroken on sampl~
PRINT NAME Time PRINT NAME Time Discrepancies Between
Sample Labels and coe
Relinquished By: Signature Date ReCeiVed~JnarrMA e:J.k -d ~~~ Record? (j Y ( 1'--' Notes:
PRINT NAME Time PRINT N",E Lr .,: '-J .. 7 . Tim2;<."" <' "? ,
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOe
TOX
TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
r~ ,~ CV~:,~~ CV~~~ Preservative All -, -r-(i~ OK I 1
pH <2 I-hS04
pH <2 I-hS04
PH >12 NaOH
pH <2 HN03
pH. <2 H2SO4 lvI's v~s ver
pH <2 H2SO4
I " pH<2HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH> 9NaOH,
Z11 Acetate
pI-I <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H3P04
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 HCL
POLlr a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
I" ,... r.
'~
Cv~~~. ,..V~~
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested -
P lace client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
Sample Set: / 2.. /~ 1" ~ Q
i L..A"'" I-' L..A""'tJ' except Except
Itt.-10.1
M@II I Laboratories LLC
a member of The GEL Group INC PO Box 30712 Charleston, SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407
P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178
January 29,2013
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: White Mesa Mill GW
Work Order: 317317
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on December 28,2012. This revised data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures. This data package was revised to review the metals data.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone] , ext. 4505.
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Heather Shaffer
Project Manager
Jlli in I' II IU Il lr III li ll III UII
www.gel.com
January 29, 2013
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 317317
Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on December 28,
2012 for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All
sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments
concerning sample receipt.
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following samples:
Case Narrative:
Laboratory ID
317317001
317317002
317317003
317317004
317317005
Client ID
~VV-ll 12242012
~VV-25 12242012
~VV-26 12242012
~VV-30 12262012
~VV-65 12262012
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler
Receipt Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: ~etals.
Heather Shaffer
Proj ect ~anager
-~
i Page: 1 of GEL Laboratories, LLC
Project #: GEL Chain of Custody and Analytical Request 2040 Savage Road
GEL Quote#:
COC Number (I):
Charleston, SC 29407
GEL Work Order Number: 3\1-3\-=t-Phone: [phone]
PO Number: Fax: [phone] -
Client Name: £ .;\"c=,..r-BY F vc:.. \S Phone #: '135 67 g ,;Z.:Z~ Sample Analysis Requested (5) (Fill in the number of containers for each test) ,
Project/Site Name: I>~" ~oN'\.hGo-~,.i-"'-lt G-w ;l.o i;l.. Fax#: '" H-~ ~ Should this a.. 41 ~ <--Preservative Type (6) c ~ sample be .;
Address: 6 J..1 ~5 s. H-wy i qi [)tc~~~ v', i'L-i!5"j' considered: C ~ Q V\ t.J ~ ~ .... ~ Comments
Collected by: T tlo-~ e.r ~+c.i i ;'/J~ Y Send Results To: &-c-("t-~'A.. PI>"-i.;-A-e.r
Q < ~ a.. I) Q,; ! ') Note: extra sample is « .t:J.
D .~ ·Time ... -; E <S < required for sample -Date Collected .~ tID = ~ Sample ID Collected QC Code Field Sample ~ Q: = specific QC (Military) (7.) Filtered (JI Matrix (~) e « ~ 1._ ~ • For composites -indicate start and stop date/time (mm-dd-yy) ~ U 0 ~ "'" (hhmm) <t (I) ~ a:: l-E--.;
/V\w-il i:l~Y2DJ2. I:L-.;t'i ~ L2 liDS ;vi Y LJ /J I X
M u '-2.5" 12'242.a11. li.1-;2..i.( -1 ~ lo ...... 1~ ;V ''1 0 ;\/ l )(
Mu--tLb. i :2-24.20i 2. L2-1..a.t -i ~ i 3".5' ;1! Y 0 Iv' ~ ~
Mw-30 i2U16i2 : i:2-a.6 -J2. (lOS /II Y ~ AI , X X
/V\LJ-65_iM..h1.01.2.. 1dt -,2,.6 ~ i J-, j D_,r; ;V Y ~ ;J \ )< ><
TAT Requested: Nonnal: X Rush: Specify: (Subject to surcharge}IFax Results: Yes / No Circle Deliverable: C of A I QC Summary I Level 1 / Level 2 I Level 3 / Level 4
Remarks: Are there any known hazards applicable to these samples? If so, please list the hazards Sam~le Collection Time Zone
Eastern Pacific
Central Other
I ('£tountaill/
Chain of Custody Signatures SampJe Shipping and Delivery Details
, Relinquished By (Signed) Date Time R,'dvod by ('HI'" . Tim' -GEL PM: J. ,. vi 12..i :2.6/ J t-l;Loo Itht~ 0, ) f)25lt 2-015> 1 /rr~ r.rAA._ Method of Shipment: Date Shipped:
2 2 V Airbill #:
3 3 Airbill #:
I.) Chain of Custody Number = Client Determined For Lab Receiving Use Only 2.) QC Codes: N = Normal Sample. TB = Trip Blank. FO = Field Duplicate. EB = Equipment Blank. MS = Matrix Spike Sample. MSO = Matrix Spike Duplicate Sample. G = Grab. C = Composite
3.) Field Filtered: For liquid matrices. indicate with a -Y -for yes the sample was field filtered or -N -for sample was not field filtered. Custody Seal inlacl?
4.) Matrix Codes: DW=Drinking Water, GW=Groundwater. SW=Surface Water. WW=Waste Water, W=Water. SO=Soil. SD=Sediment. SL=Sludge, SS=Solid Waste. O=Oil, F=Filter, P=Wipe. U"'Urine, F=Fecal. N=Nasal YES NO
5.) Sample Analysis Requested: Analytical method requested (i.e. 8260B. 6010Sn470A) and number of containers provided for each (i.e. 82608 ·3,6010817470,4 • I). Cooler Temp:
6.) Preservative Type: HA = Hydrochloric Acid. NI = Nitric Acid. SH = Sodium Hydroxide. SA = Sulfuric Acid: AA = Ascorbic Acid. HX = Hexane, ST = Sodium Thiosulfate. Ifno preservative is added'" leave field blank C
WHITE = LADORA TORY YELLOW = FILE PINK = CLIENT
g I Laboratories LLC SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
~
Client: \)W l0\ \ SDGI ARlCOC/Work Order: 0\:r~\~
Received By: \.,\ \(1 J \ ~y-Date Received: Id-;.l~l~-
\ I III Q "'If Net Counts> IOOcpm on samples not marked "radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further Suspected Hazard Information III ;,-Z investigation.
COC/Samples marked as radioactive? / Maximum Net Counts Observed'" (Observed Counts· Area Background Counts):
Classified Radioactive II or III by RSO? /' If yes, Were swipes taken of sample contatiners < action levels? OC~/I \
COC/Samples marked containing PCBs? / /' ~
Package, COC, and/or Samples marked as / beryllium or asbestos containing? lJfyes, samples are to be segregeated as Safety Controlled Samples, and opened by the GEL Safety Group.
Shipped as a DOT Hazardous? ,/ Hazard Class Shipped: UN#:
Samples identified as Foreign Soil? ./
Sample Receipt III 4( Q Comments/Qualifiers (Required for Nnn.1 III 11 .. 1110 Items) ;,-Z Z
Shipping containers received intact ~ Circle Applicable:
1 i/ Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe) and sealed? ~
Samples requiring cold preservation / / Pre'"",';oo M~\ .. ~s.( Blue ice Dry ice None Other (describe)
2
within (0 < 6 deg. C)?* are recorded in Celsius
2a Daily check performed and passed on // Device Serial II: J~ll ~(~~J".p.y.V
IR temperature gun? Secondary Temperature Device
3 Chain of custody documents included it with shipment?
Circle Applicable:
4 Sample containers intact and sealed? Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Samples requiring chemical .. I ISampl lO's, containers affected and observed pH:
5 preservation at proper pH? added. Lol#:
VaA vials free of heads pace (defined / ISample lO's and containers affected:
6 as < 6mm bubble)?
7 Are Encore containers present? ./ ~Ifyes, immediately deliver to Volatiles laboratory)
Samples received within holding lO's and tests affected:
8 Itime?
Sample lOis on eae match lOts on Sample 10's and containers affected:
9 Ibottles?
Date & time on eoe match date & Sample ID's affected:
10 time on bottles?
Number of containers received match Sample ID's affected:
11 number indicated on cae?
12 Are sample containers identifiable as
GEL provided?
13 eae form is properly signed in
relinquished/received sections?
Circle Applicable:
Fed Ex Air FedEx Ground UPS Field Services Courier Other
14 Carrier and tracking number. \'-Z-1~1) ~LfY O'l q 2c.5"/-,.J ... ~7 &/:/79-y
Comments (Use Continuation Form if needed):
PM (or PMA) review: Initials ~~ Date lala~Jl~ PagelofL
I I
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
GEL Work Order/SDG: 317317
Client SDG: 317317
December GW 2012
Project Manager: Heather Shaffer
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
DNMI00100 White Mesa Mill GW
DW16138
Package level: lEVEl3
EDD Format: EIM_DNMI
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
317317001 MW-11_12242012
317317002 MW-25_12242012
317317003 MW-26_12242012
317317004 MW-30_12262012
317317005 MW-65 _12262012
Collect
Date & Time
24-DEC-12 11 :05
24-DEC-12 10:45
24-DEC-12 13:45
26-DEC-12 11 :05
26-DEC-1211:05
Work Order Due Date: 18-JAN-13
Package Due Date:
EDD Due Date:
Due Date:
HXS1
Receive Time # of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
28-DEC-12 09:35 -2
28-DEC-12 09:35 -2
28-DEC-12 09:35 -2
28-DEC-12 09:35 -2
28-DEC-12 09:35 -2
16-JAN-13
18-JAN-13
18-JAN-13
Lab
Matrix
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 317317
Page 1 of 2
Collector: C
Prelogin #: 20121299076
Project Workdef ID: 1294356
SDG Status: Closed
logged by:
Fax Days to Prelog Lab Field
Due Date Process CofC# Group QC QC
21
21 2
21 2
21 3
21 3
Receive
Client Sample ID Status T ests/Methods
Product
Reference Fax Date PM Comments Aux Data Codes
-001 MW-11_12242012
-002 MW-25_12242012
-003 MW-26_12242012
-004 MW-30_12262012
-005 MW-65_12262012
Product: ICP2MN_L
REVW 200.2/200.7 Manganese
REVW 200.2/200.8 Uranium
REVW 200.2/200.8 Uranium
REVW 200.2/200.8 Selenium
REVW 200.2/200.8 Uranium
REVW 200.2/200.8 Selenium
REVW 200.2/200.8 Uranium
VVorkdeflD: 1308791
Method: EPA 200.7
Product Description: 200.2/200.7 Manganese
Samples: 001
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7439-96-5 Manganese
In Product Group? No Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
10
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Group Reference:
y
4
y
4
y
4
y
4
y
4
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Reporting
Units
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
ug/L REG Y Y Yes
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Product: MIM2SE_L Workdef 10: 1308792 In Product Group? No
Method: EPA 200.8
Product Description: 200.2/200.8 Selenium
Samples: 004, 005
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7782-49-2 Selenium
Product: MIM2U_L Workdef 10: 1308794 In Product Group? No
Method: EPA 200.8
Product Description: 200.2/200.8 Uranium
Samples: 002, 003, 004, 005
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7440-61-1 Uranium
Action Product Name Description
Contingent
Tests
login Requirements:
Requirement
Group Name:
Client RDl or
PQl & Unit
5
Group Name:
Client RDl or
PQl & Unit
.3
Samples
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Include? Comments
Peer Review by: ____________ _ Work Order (80G#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Group Reference:
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 317317
Page 2 of 2
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
Sample Analysis
Sample ID
317317001
317317002
317317003
317317004
317317005
1202805076
1202805077
1202805080
1202805078
1202805079
1202805071
1202805072
1202805075
1202805073
1202805074
Metals Fractional Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 317317
Client ID
MW-11 12242012
MW-25 12242012
MW-26 12242012
MW-30 12262012
MW -65 12262012
Method Blank (MB) ICP
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
317317001(MW-l1_12242012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
317317001(MW-11_12242012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
317317001(MW-l1_12242012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
Method Blank (MB) ICP-MS
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
317317002(MW-25 _12242012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
317317002(MW-25_12242012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
317317002(MW-25_12242012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Method/Analysis Information
Analytical Batch:
Prep Batch:
Standard Operating
Procedures:
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
1273046 and 1273044
1273045 and 1273043
GL-MA-E-013 REV# 21, GL-MA-E-016 REV# 9 and GL-MA-
E-014 REV# 24
EPA 200.7 and EPA 200.8
EPA 200.2
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
The SOP stated above has been prepared based on technical research and testing conducted by
GEL Laboratories, LLC. and with guidance from the regulatory documents listed in this
"Method/Analysis Information" section.
System Configuration
The Metals analysis-ICP was performed on aPE 4300 Optima radial/axial-viewing inductively
coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer. The instrument is equipped with a Burgener
nebulizer, cyclonic spray chamber, and yttrium or scandium internal standard. Operating
conditions for the ICP are set at a power level of 1500 watts. The instrument has a peristaltic
pump flow rate of 1.4L/min, argon gas flows of 15 L/min and 0.2 L/min for the torch and
auxiliary gases, and a flow setting of 0.65L/min for the nebulizer.
The Metals analysis -ICPMS was performed on a Perkin Elmer ELAN 9000 inductively coupled
plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The instrument is equipped with a cross-flow nebulizer,
quadrupole mass spectrometer, and dual mode electron multiplier detector. Internal standards of
scandium, germanium, indium, tantalum, and/or lutetium were utilized to cover the mass
spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W power and combined argon pressures of 360+/-
7 kPa for the plasma and auxiliary gases, and 0.85 L/min carrier gas flow, and an initial lens
voltage of 5.2.
Calibration Information
Instrument Calibration
All initial calibration requirements have been met for this sample delivery group (SDG).
CRDL Requirements
All CRDL standard(s) met the referenced advisory control limits.
ICSAlICSAB Statement
All interference check samples (ICSA and ICSAB) associated with this SDG met the established
acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Blank (CCB) Requirements
All continuing calibration blanks (CCB) bracketing this batch met the established acceptance
criteria.
Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) Requirements
All continuing calibration verifications (CCV) bracketing this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Quality Control (QC) Information
Method Blank (MB) Statement
The MBs analyzed with this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Recovery
The LCS spike recoveries met the acceptance limits.
Quality Control (QC) Sample Statement
The following samples were selected as the quality control (QC) samples for this SDG:
317317001 (MW-ll_12242012)-ICP and 317317002 (MW-25 _12242012)-ICP-MS.
Matrix Spike (MS) Recovery Statement
The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the MS analyses are evaluated when the sample
concentration is less than four times (4X) the spike concentration added. All applicable elements
met the acceptance criteria.
Duplicate Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The relative percent difference (RPD) obtained from the designated sample duplicate (DUP) is
evaluated based on acceptance criteria of 20% when the sample is >5X the contract required
detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the
contract required detection limit (RL), a control of +/-RL is used to evaluate the DUP results. All
applicable analytes met these requirements with the exception of uranium.
Serial Dilution % Difference Statement
The serial dilution is used to assess matrix suppression or enhancement. Raw element
concentrations that are 25X the IDL/MDL for CVAA, 50X the IDL/MDL for ICP, and 100X the
IDL/MDL for ICP-MS analyses are applicable for serial dilution assessment. All applicable
analytes met the acceptance criteria of less than 10% difference (%D).
Technical Information
Holding Time Specifications
GEL assigns holding times based on the associated methodology, which assigns the date and
time from sample collection of sample receipt. Those holding times expressed in hours are
calculated in the AlphaLIMS system. Those holding times expressed as days expire at midnight
on the day of expiration. All samples in this SDG met the specified holding time.
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
All procedures were performed as stated in the SOP.
Sample Dilutions
Dilutions are performed to minimize matrix interferences resulting from elevated mineral
element concentrations present in solid samples and/or to bring over range target analyte
concentrations into the linear calibration range of the instrument. The samples in this SDGdid
not require dilutions.
Preparation Information
The samples in this SDG were prepared exactly according to the cited SOP.
Miscellaneous Information
Electronic Packaging Comment
This data package was generated using an electronic data processing program referred to as
virtual packaging. In an effort to increase quality and efficiency, the laboratory has developed
systems to generate all data packages electronically. The following change from traditional
packages should be noted:
Analyst/peer reviewer initials and dates are not present on the electronic data files. Presently, all
initials and dates are present on the original raw data. These hard copies are temporarily stored in
the laboratory. An electronic signature page inserted after the case narrative will include the data
validator's signature and title. The signature page also includes the data qualifiers used in the
fractional package. Data that are not generated electronically, such as hand written pages, will be
scanned and inserted into the electronic package.
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate
from referenced SOP or contractual documents. The following DER was generated for this SDG:
DER ID 1153718. A copy is included in the Miscellaneous Data section of this package.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this SDG.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has
met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case
narrative.
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data
designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion
of the data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
Reviewer: ~~ate:_1----I-\S---,-I'_3 ____ _
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis Report
for
DNMIOOI Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 317317 GEL Work Order: 317317
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
U Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
The designation ND, if present, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above
the limit as defined in the 'U' qualifier above.
This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC
standard operating procedures. Please direct any questionsto your Project Manager, Heather Shaffer.
Reviewed by
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 317317
Parmname NOM
\1etals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1273044
QC 1202805073 317317002 DUP
Selenium
Uranium
QC12028050n LCS
Selenium 50.0
Uranium 50.0
QC1202805071 MB
Selenium
Uranium
QC1202805074 317317002 MS
Selenium 50.0
Uranium 50.0
QC1202805075 317317002 SDILT
Selenium
Uranium
\1etals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1273046
QC1202805078 317317001 DUP
Manganese
QC1202805077 LCS
Manganese 500
QC1202805076 MB
Manganese
QC 1202805079 317317001 MS
Manganese 500
QC1202805080 317317001 SDILT
Manganese
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
U
U
U
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
QC Summarx
Sample Qual QC Units RPDID%
5.00 U 5.00 ug/L N/A
4.83 6.08 ug/L 23.0*
52.2 ug/L
53.5 ug/L
U 5.00 ug/L
U 0.300 ug/L
5.00 54.0 ug/L
4.83 50.8 ug/L
7.50 U 7.50 ug/L N/A
4.83 1.10 ug/L 14.4
137 138 ug/L 0.276
524 ug/L
U 10.0 ug/L
137 624 ug/L
137 27.4 ug/L .317
A
B
C
D
E
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
ReDort Date: February 5, 2013
Page lof 2
REC% Range Anlst
RMJ
(0%-20%)
104 (85%-115%)
107 (85%-115%)
108 (75%-125%)
92 (75%-125%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-10%)
(0%-20%) LS
105 (85%-115%)
97.4 (75%-125%)
(0%-10%)
Date Time
01 /04/13 02:3
01/04113 02: 1
01/04113 02: 1·
01/04113 02:3'
01/04/13 02:4
12/31/12 11:51
12/31112 11:4·
12/31/12 11:4
12/31112 11:5-
12/31/12 115
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 317317 Page 2 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Ran~e Anlst Date Time
F Estimated Value
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H Analytical holding time was exceeded
M Matrix Related Failure
N Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
NI A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl
ND
NJ
Q
R
U
U
X
Y
/\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
NI A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +1-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result. * Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
00#111 1 Laboratories LLC
a member of The GEL Group INC PO Box 30712 Charleston, SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407
P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178
January 29,2013
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: White Mesa Mill GW
Work Order: 317215
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on December 24,2012. This revised data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures. This data package was revised to review the metals data.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4505.
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
111 111 III
Sincerely,
Heather Shaffer
Project Manager
II m III 111
www.gel.com
January 29, 2013
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 317215
Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on December 24,
2012 for analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All
sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments
concerning sample receipt.
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following samples:
Case Narrative:
Laboratory ID
317215001
317215002
Client ID
~VV-14 12182012
~VV-35 12182012
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler
Receipt Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: ~etals and
Radiochemistry .
Heather Shaffer
Proj ect ~anager
Page: I of i GE~ Laboratories, LLC
Project #: GEL Chain of Custody and Analytical Request 2040 Savage Road
GEL Quote #: Charleston, SC 29407
COC Number (I): GEL Work Order Number: :)1 ( (}\5 Phone: [phone]
PO Number: Fax: [phone]
Client Name: ~CJo.z" .\v..c.\~ Phone #: L13S '75 22..21 Sample Analysis Requested (5) (Fill in the number of containers for each test)
Project/Site Name: De~be(' G-ro~\~~icr Fax #: '" ~ W \4 ~ Should this I.
2012.. QJ <--Preservative Type (6) = ~ ~ 'l. '<
1\\ 'tnt\. ~t'a sample be ';
.-\: Address: C..,2S S k\-~ iq I LA\ 8~S}1 considered: -= 0 ~ ~ ....s;
Collected bY:<\MM »DiI;~ Send Resul~: Vc;t£{";"
... f ~ ~--Comments 'POl)~4 0 ~ 1..0 ~ QJ ~ s <:! Note: extra sample 1S « .c ~ '< ~ ·Time ~ :; E P'c ~ Jl required for sample ·Oate Collected > 00 = U ~ Sample ID Collected QC Code Field Sample u ~ = ~ 6 <6 specific QC .. -; \.-J) ~ (Military) en Filtered (Jl Matrix (4) Q < ~ ? (mm-dd-yy) :; U '0 * For composites -indicate start and stop date/time (hhmm) " VJ ~ cr: r--E-r
MVJ -\1.\ -\2\~ ~\2... t2Jf~/(z... \O'-\D rJ Y &-~ ~ \ . i
MW-35_12if<'LCiL \'),/1~1i2 IL-\,D .,J V &vJ ,.J :2-i-'i.. ~ ~ '" t
10-
TAT Requested: Nonnal: '/... Rush: Specify: (Subject to Surcharge) IFax Results: Yes / cNo\ Circle Deliverable: C of A / QC Summary I Level 1 I Level 2 I Level 3 I Level 4
Remarks: Are there any known hazards applicable to these samples? If so, please list the hazards Sam~le Collection Time Zone
Eastern Pacific , ~I Other
Mou~
Chain of Custody Signatures Sample Shipping and Delivery Details
. Relinquished By (Signed) Date Time Received by (signed) Date () t..f ~ime
1 ?~fiL-~f\\;~\cV~
GEL PM:
'£J..I~~I ,~ ,~ 12/~iz3t)?-Method of Shipment: Date Shipped:
2 2 V 0-~IU]'-ill't.,
Airbill #:
3 3 Airbill #:
I.) Chain of Custody Number = Client Detennined F0rJE!!!!eceiving Use Only
2.) QC Codes: N = Nonnal Sample. TB '" Trip Blank. FD = Field Duplicate. EB '" Equipment Blank, MS = Matrix Spike Sample. MSD '" Matrix Spike Duplicate Sample. G = Grab, C = Composite
3.) Field Filtered: For liquid matrices. indicate with a -Y -lor yes the sample was field filtered or - N -for sample was not field filtered. ( CustOJ Seal intact?
4.) Matrix Codes: DW=Drinking Water. GW=Groundwater. SW=Surface Water. WW=Waste Water. W=Water. SO=Soil. SD=Sediment. SV=Sludge. SS=Solid Waste. O=Oil. F=Filter. P=Wipe. U"'Urine. F=Fecal. N=Nasal y~~ NO
5.) Sample Analysis Requested: Analytical method requested (i.e. 82608. 60JOB17470A) and number of containers provided for each (i.e. 8260B ,3. 60/08/7470A -I). C~Tem~:
6.) Preservative Type: HA '" Hydrochloric Acid. NI '" Nitric Acid. SH = Sodium Hydroxide. SA '" Sulfuric Acid: AA '" Ascorbic Acid. HX = Hexane. ST '" Sodium Thiosulfate. Ifno preservative is added = leave field blank
WHITE = LABORATORY YELLOW = FILE PINK = CLIENT
m:3Il Laboratories LLC SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
/'.
Client: ~9j'\JO\/'-,\ Fv"'~J. 5 SDGI ARlCOClWork Order: '6 I '-1 ~ \ S ·
Received By: ~~ Date Received: I 2./ 2..~LJ / 'l}-
Suspected HazarJJnformation rl C> "'If Net Counts> lOOcpm on samples riot marked "radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further
~ Z investigation. f-.../
COC/Samples marked as radioactive? IY-Maximum Net Counts Observed'" (Observed Counts -Area Background Counts): \.,L)
Classified Radioactive II or III by RSO? Ik:'--If yes, Were swipes taken of sample contatiners < action levels? ,/
C~C/Samples marked containing PCBs? )L.
Package, COC, and/or Samples marked as >I beryllium or asbestos containing? If yes, samples are to be segregeated as Safety Controlled Samples, and opened by the GEL Safety Group.
Shipped as a DOT Hazardous? 1,><:. Hazard Class Shipped: UN#:
Samples identified as Foreign Soil? X.
SampJ ~ipt ~ ~ ~ Comments/Qualifiers (Required for 1"nn. 111mb Items)
Shipping containers received intact X Circle Applicable:
1 and sealed? Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
./ .•... . ... ,
Samples requiring cold preservation k 3(/ Preservation Methot, :~~.~ . ..-. BII ice Dry ice None Other (describe)
2
within (0 < 6 deg. C)?* 'au are recorded in Celsius
Daily check performed and passed on ><
Temperature Device Serial #: b I ,5 :JCj £ if 6 2a IR temperature gun? Secondary Temperature Device Serial # (If Applicable):
3 Chain of custody documents included >( with shipment?
'< Circle Applicable:
4 Sample containers intact and sealed? Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
5 Samples requiring chemical KJ Sample lO's, containers affected and observed pH:
preservation at proper pH? l added. r n!#~
VDA vials free of heads pace (defined ~ Sample lO's and containers affected:
6 as < 6mm bubble)?
Are Encore containers present? 'I
(If yes, immediately deliver to Volatiles laboratory)
7
Samples received within holding ID's and tests affected:
8 I time?
Sample [D's on CDC match [D's on )< Sample lO's and containers affected:
9 I bottles?
Date & time on CDC match date & '/ Sample lO's affected:
10 Itime on bottles?
Number of containers received match X Sample lO's affected:
11 number indicated on COC?
12 Are sample containers identifiable as
;( GEL provided?
13 CDC form is properly signed in ~ relinquished/received sections?
FedEx Air FedEx Ground c~~ UPS Field Services Courier Other
. 9 '-\ 0 <:1 ?. l 0 t Lt ~ l ~ 9 ~S()
14 Carrier and tracking number. i 1--) t ?
,., (Use Continuation Form ifneeded):
I' .. ,.,... " PM (or PMA) review: Initials .{1f-Date (:J...~~ c-Page.-lofL
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 317215
Page 1 of 3
GEL Work Order/SDG: 317215
Client SDG: 317215
December GW 2012 Work Order Due Date: 14-JAN-13 Collector: C
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
Heather Shaffer
DNMI00100 White Mesa Mill GW
DW16138
LEVEL3
EIM_DNMI
GELID . Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
317215001 MVV-14_12182012
317215002 MVV-35_12182012
Client Sample ID
-001 MW-14_12182012
-002 MW-35_12182012
Status Tests/Methods
REVW 200.2/200.7 Manganese
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW 200.2/200.7 Manganese
REVW 200.2/200.8 Selenium
REVW 200.2/200.8 Thallium
REVW 200.2/200.8 Uranium
Collect
Date & Time
Package Due Date:
EDD Due Date:
Due Date:
JOH1
Receive Time # of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
18-DEC-12 10:40 24-DEC-12 09:05 -2
18-DEC-1214:40 24-DEC-12 09:05 -2 2
Product
Reference
Gross Alpha
Fax Date PM Comments
Product: MIM2TL_L VVorkdeflD: 1295585 In Product Group? No Group Name:
Method: EPA 200.8
Product Description: 200.2/200.8 Thallium
Samples: 002
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7440-28-0 ,Thallium
Client RDL or
PQL & Unit
.5
12-JAN-13
14-JAN-13
14-JAN-13
Prelogin #: 20121097089
Project Workdef ID: 1294356
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
Lab
Matrix
Fax Days to
Due Date Process CofC#
Prelog Lab Field
Group QC QC
GROUND VVATER
GROUND VVATER
21
21
Aux Data
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Cooler Seal Undisturbed
Temperature (C)
Group Reference:
y
3
Y
3
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
4
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
Receive
Codes
FF
FF
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Product: GFCTORAL Workdef 10: 1297250 In Product Group? No
Method: EPA 900.1 Modified
Product Description: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Samples: 002
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
Gross Radium Alpha
Product: ICP2MN_L WorkdeflD: 1308791 In Product Group? No
Method: EPA 200.7
Product Description: 200.2/200.7 Manganese
Samples: 001, 002
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7439-96-5 Manganese
Product: MIM2SE_L WorkdeflD: 1308792 In Product Group? No
Method: EPA 200.8
Product Description: 200.2/200.8 Selenium
Samples: 002
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7782-49-2 Selenium
Product: MIM2U_L WorkdeflD: 1308794 In Product Group? No
Method: EPA 200.8
Product Description: 200.2/200.8 Uranium
Samples: 002
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS # Parmname
7440-61-1 Uranium
Group Name:
Client RDl or
PQl & Unit
Group Name:
Client RDl or
PQl & Unit
10
Group Name:
Client RDl or
PQl & Unit
5
Group Name:
Client RDl or
PQl & Unit
.3
Reporting
Units
pCilL
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Reporting
Units
ug/L
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 317215
Page 2 of 3
Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Yes
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Yes
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference:
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG Y Y Yes
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Contingent
Tests
Action
Login Requirements:
Product Name Description
Requirement
Samples
Include? Comments
Peer Review by: ____________ _ Work Order (80G#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Report Date: 29-JAN-13
Work Order: 317215
Page 3 of 3
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
Sample Analysis
Sample ID
317215001
317215002
1202803817
1202803818
1202803821
1202803819
1202803820
1202803822
1202803823
1202803826
1202803824
1202803825
Metals Fractional Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 317215
Client ID
~VV-14 12182012
~VV-35 12182012
Method Blank (MB) ICP
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
317215001(MVV-14_12182012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
317215001(MVV-14_12182012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
317215001(MVV-14_12182012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
Method Blank (MB) ICP-MS
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
317215002(MVV-35_12182012L) Serial Dilution (SD)
317215002(MVV-35_12182012D) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
317215002(MVV-35_12182012S) Matrix Spike (MS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
Method/Analysis Information
Analytical Batch:
Prep Batch:
Standard Operating
Procedures:
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
1272611 and 1272613
1272610 and 1272612
GL-MA-E-013 REV# 21, GL-MA-E-016 REV# 9 and GL-MA-E-014 REV#
24
EPA 200.7 and EPA 200.8
EPA 200.2
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
The SOP stated above has been prepared based on technical research and testing conducted by GEL Laboratories,
LLC. and with guidance from the regulatory documents listed in this "Method/Analysis Information" section.
System Configuration
The Metals analysis-ICP was performed on aPE 4300 Optima radial/axial-viewing inductively coupled plasma
atomic emission spectrometer. The instrument is equipped with a Burgener nebulizer, cyclonic spray chamber, and
yttrium or scandium internal standard. Operating conditions for the ICP are set at a power level of 1500 watts. The
instrument has a peristaltic pump flow rate of 1.4L/min, argon gas flows of 15 L/min and 0.2 L/min for the torch and
auxiliary gases, and a flow setting of 0.65L/min for the nebulizer.
The Metals analysis -ICPMS was performed on a Perkin Elmer ELAN 6100E inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometer (lCP-MS). The instrument is equipped with a cross-flow nebulizer, quadrupole mass spectrometer, and
dual mode electron multiplier detector. Internal standards of scandium, germanium, indium, tantalum, and/or lutetium
were utilized to cover the mass spectrum. Operating conditions are set at 1400W power and combined argon pressures
of 360+/-7 kPaJor the plasma and auxiliary gases, and 0.85 L/min carrier gas flow, and an initial lens voltage of5.2.
Calibration Information
Instrument Calibration
All initial calibration requirements have been met for this sample delivery group (SDG).
CRDL Requirements
All CRDL standard(s) met the referenced advisory control limits.
ICSA/ICSAB Statement
All interference check samples (lCSA and ICSAB) associated with this SDG met the established acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Blank (CCB) Requirements
All continuing calibration blanks (CCB) bracketing this batch met the established acceptance criteria.
Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) Requirements
All continuing calibration verifications (CCV) bracketing this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Quality Control (OC) Information
Method Blank (MB) Statement
The MBs analyzed with this SDG met the acceptance criteria.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Recovery
The LCS spike recoveries met the acceptance limits.
Quality Control (QC) Sample Statement
The following samples were selected as the quality control (QC) samples for this SDG: 317215001
(MW-14_12182012)-ICP and 317215002 (MW-35 _12182012)-ICP-MS.
Matrix Spike (MS) Recovery Statement
The percent recoveries (%R) obtained from the MS analyses are evaluated when the sample concentration is less than
four times (4X) the spike concentration added. All applicable elements met the acceptance criteria.
Duplicate Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Statement
The RPD obtained from the designated sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated based on acceptance criteria of 20%
when the sample is >5X the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value
is less than 5X the RL, a control of +/-RL is used to evaluate the DUP results. All applicable analytes met these
requirements.
Serial Dilution % Difference Statement
The serial dilution is used to assess matrix suppression or enhancement. Raw element concentrations that are 25X the
IDLIMDL for CVAA, 50X the IDL/MDL for ICP, and 100X the IDLIMDL for ICP-MS analyses are applicable for
serial dilution assessment. All applicable analytes met the acceptance criteria of less than 10% difference (%D).
Technical Information
Holding Time Specifications
GEL assigns holding times based on the associated methodology, which assigns the date and time from sample
collection of sample receipt. Those holding times expressed in hours are calculated in the AlphaLIMS system. Those
holding times expressed as days expire at midnight on the day of expiration. All samples in this SDG met the specified
holding time.
Preparation/Analytical Method Verification
All procedures were performed as stated in the SOP.
Sample Dilutions
Dilutions are performed to minimize matrix interferences resulting from elevated mineral element concentrations
present in solid samples and/or to bring over range target analyte concentrations into the linear calibration range of the
instrument. The samples in this SDG did not require dilutions.
Preparation Information
The samples in this SDG were prepared exactly according to the cited SOP.
Miscellaneous Information
Electronic Packaging Comment
This data package was generated using an electronic data processing program referred to as virtual packaging. In an
effort to increase quality and efficiency, the laboratory has developed systems to generate all data packages
electronically. The following change from traditional packages should be noted:
Analyst/peer reviewer initials and dates are not present on the electronic data files. Presently, all initials and dates are
present on the original raw data. These hard copies are temporarily stored in the laboratory. An electronic signature
page inserted after the case narrative will include the data validator's signature and title. The signature page also
includes the data qualifiers used in the fractional package. Data that are not generated electronically, such as hand
written pages, will be scanned and inserted into the electronic package.
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports (DERs) are generated to document procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this SDG.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
Review Validation:
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data designated for CLP or
CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative:
Reviewer: C:::<~te: __ 2--t-\ S-t-II)...L..--.-__ _
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis Report
for
DNMIOO 1 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 31 7215 GEL Work Order: 31 7215
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
* * Analyte is a surrogate compound
V Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
V Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
The designation ND, if present, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above
the limit as defined in the 'V' qualifier above.
This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC
standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Heather Shaffer.
Reviewed by
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary Report Date: February 5, 2013 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc. Page lof 2
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 317215
Parmname NOM Sam~le Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
\'Ietals Analysis -ICPMS
3atch 1272613
QC1202803824 317215002 OUP
Selenium 12.1 12.5 ug/L 3.51 1\ (+1-5.00) SKJ 12127/1222:5
Thallium 0.500 U 0.500 ug/L 17.9 1\ (+1-0.500)
Uranium 21.0 21.2 ug/L 0.891 (0%-20%)
QC1202803823 LCS
Selenium 50.0 50.2 ug/L 100 (85%-115%) 1212711222:4
Thallium 50.0 45.5 ug/L 91 (85%-115%)
Uranium 50.0 49.5 ug/L 98.9 (85%-115%)
QC1202803822 MB
Selenium U 5.00 ug/L 12127/1222:3
Thallium U 0.500 ug/L
Uranium U 0.300 ug/L
QC1202803825 317215002 MS
Selenium 50.0 12.1 71.3 ug/L 119 (75%-125%) 1212711223:0
Thallium 50.0 0.500 44.7 ug/L 88.4 (75%-125%)
Uranium 50.0 21.0 71.4 ug/L 101 (75%-125%)
QC1202803826 317215002 SOILT
Selenium 12.1 U 7.50 ug/L N/A (0%-10%) 1212711223:0
Thallium 0.500 U 2.25 ug/L N/A (0%-10%)
Uranium 21.0 4.15 ug/L 1.27 (0%-10%)
\'Ietals Analysis-ICP
3atch 1272611
QC1202803819 317215001 OUP
Manganese 1950 1980 ug/L 1.67 (0%-20%) LS 12/27112 11 :3'
QC1202803818 LCS
Manganese 500 502 ug/L 100 (85%-115%) 12/27112 11 :3
QC1202803817 MB
Manganese U 10.0 ug/L 12127112 11 :2'
QC1202803820 317215001 MS
Manganese 500 1950 2420 ug/L 94.6 (75%-125%) 12127112 11:4
QC1202803821 317215001 SOILT
Manganese 1950 389 ug/L .377 (0%-10%) 12127112 11:4·
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
< Result is less than value reported
> Result is greater than value reported
A The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 317215 Page 2 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPDID% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
B For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
C Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
D Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
E Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 1 0%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
F . Estimated Value
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H Analytical holding time was exceeded
K Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
L Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M M if above MDC and less than LLD
M Matrix Related Failure
N Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
NI A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl
ND
NJ
Q
R
V
V
VI
VJ
UL
X
Y
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package,or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected aboye the CRDL.
Metals--Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the greater of either the MDL or the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Vncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
NI A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DVP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +1-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Method/Analysis Information
Product:
Analytical Method:
Analytical Batch Number:
Sample ID
317215002
1202804186
1202804187
1202804188
1202804189
1202804190
Radiochemistry Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 317215
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
EPA 900.1 Modified
1272722
Client ID
MW-35 12182012
Method Blank (MB)
317215002(MW-35 _12182012) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
317215002(MW-35 _12182012) Matrix Spike (MS)
317215002(MW-35_12182012) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-RAD-A-OI0 REV# 14.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information
All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information
Standard solutions for these analysis are NIST traceable or verified with a NIST traceable standard and used
before the expiration dates.
Sample Geometry
All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Ouality Control (OC) Information:
Blank Information
The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 317215002 (MW-35_12182012).
QC Information
All of the QC samples meet the required acceptance limits with the following exceptions: The sample and the
duplicate, 1202804187 (MW-35_12182012) and 317215002 (MW-35_121820l2), did not meet the relative
percent difference requirement; however, they do meet the relative error ratio requirement with value of 1.1516.
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Chemical Recoveries
All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
Additional comments were not required for this sample set.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMIOO 1 Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 317215 GEL Work Order: 317215
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
Review/Validation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all eLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
~~""'··~/{,.· Signature: ..... ,........ ...... -.... II ." .... .
". -'. " ""', .'. ..... ... )" . . . .' . ~
Name: Kate Gellatly
Date: 07 JAN 2013 Title: Analyst I
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado
Contact: Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 317215
Parmname NOM
Rad Gas Flow
Batch 1272722
QC 1202804187 317215002 DUP
Gross Radium Alpha
Uncertainty
QC 1202804190 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha 556
Uncertainty
QC 1202804186 MB
Gross Radium Alpha
Uncertainty
QC 1202804188 317215002 MS
Gross Radium Alpha 559
Uncertainty
QC1202804189 317215002 MSD
Gross Radium Alpha 559
Uncertainty
Notes:
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
QC SummarI
Sample Qual QC Units RPD%
6.50 4.97 pCilL 26.6*
+/-0.864 +/-0.691
479 pCiIL
+/-6.77
U pCi/L
+/-0.225
6.50 492 pCilL
+/-0.864 +/-6.50
6.50 508 pCilL 3.15
+/-0.864 +/-6.67
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GCIMS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Metals--%difference of sample and SD is > 10%. Sample concentration must meet flagging criteria
Estimated Value
Renort Date: January 7, 2013
Page lof 2
REC% Range Anlst
(0% -20%) KDFI
86.3 (75%-125%)
86.8 (75%-125%)
89.6 (0%-20%)
Date Ti
01103113 I
01 /03/13 I
01 /03/13 I
01103113 I
01 /03/13 I
A
B
BD
C
D
E
F
FB Mercury was found present at quantifiable concentrations in field blanks received with these samples. Data associated with the blank are deemed
invalid for reporting to regulatory agencies
H
K
L
M
M
N
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Matrix Related Failure
Metals--The Matrix spike sample recovery is not within specified control limits
, ___ 1 0 ~.C" 1 (\
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 -[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 317215 Page 2 of 2
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nt
ND
NJ
Q
R
U
UI
UJ
UL
X
Y
/\
h
See case narrative
Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the cRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +I-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
Date Ti
/\ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater tha
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL)~ In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +1-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
'<;.to-p 1 Q of 1 Q
TabG
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
G-IA: Routine Field Data QNQC Evaluation
%i% o " "", .. ., ';i" ,,!;"1' ;" 71 I.' m. rd" ' r.~ j1f' 'If(i' ,~ '{ft, , '. l IV }'iil98 i'i • ~ " ~ ,~ I ". {l" . ''l\¥ 'fir, iiliI' 'yg f1i;"'.,f41YYP ,,"1M
" , j,'
i.' Time Req' d fori' Time;Ptftnpea " Amount W! l'io :~ ~n(%);! W~II , SaDiple Date *~ Casings I &'rr 0 (min) " Sid'fjciel1t'!" ,~ Conductance _ ~ RPD(%) " 11'", .flU: 7r, y RPD(%) ~\o;Tel1)i rq Red~x Po{~niial'(E1) JlpD(%) ~ Turbidity (NTU) I; ''>~ N:J,'U I"/RPD(%)
MW-Ol 11127/2012 181.40 185 Y 1837 1836 0.05 6.93 6.98 0.72 13.95 13.96 0.07 469 463 1.29 9.8' . 9.9 Y 1.02
MW-02 11/27/2012 114.04 120 Y 3775 3775 0.00 6.7 6.81 1.63 13.42 13.50 0.59 514 514 0.00 0 0 N 0.00
MW-03 11128/2012 48.83 60 Y 5825 5824 0.02 6.48 6.55 1.07 14.64 14.66 0.14 461 461 0.00 0 0 N 0.00
MW-03A 11129/2012 61.53 60 Pumped dry 6017 6025 0.13 6.30 6.35 0.79 12.27 13.09 6.47 534 519 .. 2.85 0 0 N 0.00
MW-05 11/27/2012 191.98 195 Y 2971 2971 0.00 7.25 7.32 0.96 14.63 14.57 0.41 416 419 0.72 0 0 N 0.00
MW-11 11112/2012 248.56 280 Y 2931 2930 0.03 7.47 7.47 0.00 14.40 14.41 0.07 249 246 1.21 0 0 N 0.00
MW-12 11/27/2012 131.20 135 Y 4252 4253 0.02 6.48 6.54 0.92 15.00 15.00 0.00 509 508 0.20 9:8 9.7' y 1.03
MW-14 11/27/2012 149.49 150 Y 3948 3950 0.05 6.52 6.52 0.00 14.47 14.47 0.00 460 460 0.00 0 0 N 0.00
MW-15 11114/2012 182.90 185 Y 4326 4324 0.05 6.87 6.86 0.15 14.42 14.45 0.21 332 331 0.30 0 0 N 0.00
MW-17 11128/2012 226.89 240 Y 4169 4173 0.10 6.59 6.64 0.76 14.26 14.25 0.07 492 492 0.00 0 0 N 0.00
MW-18 11126/2012 384.27 390 Y 3516 3520 0.11 6.49 6.51 0.31 14.17 14.18 0.07 533 534 0.19 4 4.1 N 2.47
MW-19 12/13/2012 566.93 600 Y 1808 1808 0.00 6.71 6.71 0.00 13.86 13.90 0.29 364 363 0.28 94 97 Y 3.14
MW-20 12112/2012 N/A Bailed dry. 361 1 7.72 0
.. 21.3 Y 200.00 N/A 5910 6354 7.24 6.43 7.02 8.77 10.04 10.77 7.02 390
MW-22 11126/2012 282.50 300 Y 7587 7591 0.05 4.78 4.77 0.21 14.74 14.68 0.41 552 552 0.00 3.9 ' :4 N 2.53
MW-23 12/5/2012 107.12 100 Pumped dry 3907 3909 0.05 6.7 6.61 1.35 13.56 13.68 0.88 511 504r.= 1.38 5 7.3 Y 37.40 Ifl~", 'i.~~ M.W!24~ "";,; '~ :!.t f l2'<}),{2CH2 ~ I~l_:~. =3~4~ ~'f£;"',~ 1~7 ~~{' ~4Q;" 'il;'~ .r; ;'!l , V ",f -,~ ;0: I~~ i't4S'~~ ,lit", ; J'J 45,[ 5,:11'. ' .' . _~'CknJ1i,,; ;, I~~ 'i;;7}:..~ '1"'If[~l~, d5.lQ~ ~~~r:J~ ~4.49,it ... '2 4i3~~ c~ I:'''~ ~~4:;i' '" .,§ 51~i rp .• !.0.96 ;; 1»:.5.1' 1· ~.;s ~, ' I\\t ,Nf~i:'~ 150.00
MW-25 11112/2012 249.40 288 Y 3179 3178 0.03 6.43 6.47 0.62 14.25 14.27 0.14 509 509 0.00 4.3 4.3 N 0.00
MW-26 11115/2012 NA 3478 NC 6.60 NC 14.98 NC 243 NC 0 N NC
MW-27 11113/2012 260.59 270 Y 1612 1608 0.25 6.62 6.69 1.05 14.68 14.69 0.07 487 502 3.03 0 0 N 0.00
MW-28 11114/2012 200.89 205 Y 3994 3996 0.05 5.98 5.98 0.00 14.34 14.34 0.00 348 348 0.00 0 0 N 0.00
MW-29 11114/2012 150.15 155 Y 4712 4713 0.02 6.48 6.48 0.00 14.40 14.50 0.69 210 210 0.00 " 22 . 22.3 Y 1.35
MW-30 11113/2012 201.19 210 Y 2082 2081 0.05 6.62 6.67 0.75 14.40 14.39 0.07 491 494 0.61 0 0 N 0.00
MW-31 11/612012 373.98 390 Y 1976 1975 0.05 7.01 7.04 0.43 14.72 14.71 0.07 456 455 0.22 0 0 N 0.00
MW-32 11/612012 349.73 360 Y 3895 3904 0.23 6.22 6.23 0.16 14.47 14.48 0.07 340 354 4.03 31.5 . 33 Y 1.53
MW-35 11113/2012 72.16 75 Y 4198 4200 0.05 6.48 6.50 0.31 14.33 14.31 0.14 358 356( 0.56 0 0 N 0.00
MW-36 11/14/2012 65.72 70 Y 4992 4993 0.02 6.88 6.87 0.15 14.15 14.18 0.21 251 253' 0.79 0 0 N 0.00
MW-37 ",1215/2012 N/A N/A Bailed dry. 4483 4524 0.91 7.08 7.04 0.57 15.08 14.91 1.13 511 50911 0.39 0 25.1 Y 200.00
rfhe QAP states th,at turbidity should be less than 5 Nephelometric Turbidity Units ("NTU") prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a higher turbidity. The QAP does not require that turbidity measurements be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such, the noted _
observations regarding turbidity measurements less than 5 NTU are included for information nufposes only. ~,
NI A = The amount of water in the well was insufficient to purge. The pump was not able to operate due to the minimal amount of water. The well was sampled with a bailer.
RPD > 10%. Per the revised QAPs Revisions 7.1 and 7.2, Attachment 2-3, when a well is purged to dryness, only pH, temperature and specific conductance parameters are required to be within 10% RPD. Redox potential and turbidity paramters are measured for information purposes only and as such are not required to
meet the 10% RPD criteria used for pH, specific conductance and temperature ..
NC = Not calculated.
r
G-IB: Acelerated Field Data QNQC Evaluation
." ." !&I. ~ w, W5 Jll ~ 'ill Hf Jll !!Ii! 'U I' ~ " ~Jll i!II Jll "
.. w 'w(
( ill I" Time Re,q'd for 21&-Time Pumped Amount I~ '" Ilfil ,'If!! l,i!II S;pn61~ Da:t~ Redox Potential,(Eh] : I"" WI Well ~'ll. Casings (min) Sufficient?# ConductaoC:e RPJ)(%) pH!!! , RPD(%) wlffi TenlP", rq RPD(%) I'~ RPD(%J.". , Turt)idity (NTU) <5~NfU) ",-,RPD(%h
!II ; ~. uu . " Accelerated Octotier ~ootltly w Jll Jll @III 'W " r. Il! ~, '", .. "" ,;~ .:!!L ~ :E i!II ,~. .. . ill I¥i F w ~~ ..b ,14; iii MW-11 10/23/2012 255.48 315 Y 2973 2974 0.03 7.38 7.39 0.14 14.95 14.93 0.13 53 50 5.83 0 0 y 0.00
MW-14 10/23/2012 151.66 180 Y 3953 3955 0.05 6.89 6.83 0.87 14.80 14.78 0.14 140 141 0.71 0 0 y 0.00
MW-25 10/2212012 251.20 320 Y 3240 3241 0.03 6.55 6.54 0.15 14.70 14.69 0.07 196 194 1.03 21 21.8 N 3.74
MW-26 10/24/2012 NA 3502 NC 6.63 NC 19.6 NC 155 NC 0 Y 0.00
MW-30 10/23/2012 207.63 225 Y 2068 2068 0.00 6,8 6.83 0.44 14.51 14.57 0.41 214 214 0.00 0 0 y 0.00
MW-31 10/22/2012 375.91 420 Y 1973 1976 0.15 7.04 7.05 0.14 14.83 14.85 0.13 212 214 0.94 0 0 y 0.00
MW-35 10/23/2012 74.02 95 Y 4208 4205 0.07 6.44 6.43 0.16 14.80 14.76 0.27 160 160 0.00 0 0 y 0.00 ''If!! IiiI w Accelerated December Monthly Jll II i!II' ~ I1il Ji '* : Jll ¥i1 !ill, '" .. ~ J' i!II MW-11 12124/2012 256.62 260 Y 2940 2947 0.24 7.4 7.46 0.81 13.87 13.84 0.22 319 314 1.58 0 0 y 0.00 MW-14 12/18/2012 152.56 160 Y 4229 4210 0.45 6.60 6.60 0.00 11.28 11.30 0.18 324 323 0.31 0 0 y 0.00 MW-25 12/2412012 252.77 255 Y 3145 3297 4.72 6.62 6.62 0.00 13.81 13.92 0.79 413 412 0.24 81 83 N 2.44
MW-26 12/24/2012 NA 3470 NC 6.78 NC 13.91 NC 307 NC 0 Y 0.00
MW-30 1212612012 208.47 211 Y 2089 2089 0.00 6.96 6.95 0.14 13.93 13.91 0.14 337 329 2.40 0 0 y 0.00
MW-31 12/1812012 377.05 380 Y 2006 2005 0.05 7.10 7.10 0.00 13.75 13.78 0.22 335 334 0.30 0 0 y 0.00
MW-35 12/18/2012 74.62 80 Y 4290 4288 0.05 6.61 6.61 0.00 13.28 13.30 0.15 226 224 0.89 0 0 y 0.00
iThe {j~ state~~at turbjdi~' sh6uId be less than 5 NeDhelometric TurbiditY.: Units_("NTtJ:IR.riOF to, sampIin,g-unl€s:s,the well is characterized by water that has 'a higher tUrbidity. Tbe QAP dres not ;r~qpire that tli1JbidirY me~sQ{em€nts be iess than, 5, m U:prior to samJ2ling. As such, the noted
MW -26 IS a contmuously pumped well.
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
Iii ",.
"! QA. HoUling'% liil Mwtl MW-2 .;.; MW-3 ~ MW-3A t ~, Constituent Time 111~7lZ012 11127/12 11128112 \1129/12" L "P,k, '% :." ,*' "" "" x, "'.
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Acetone 14 days 3 days 3 days 2 days , 1 days
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Arsenic 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Benzene 14 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Beryllium 6 months 17 days 17 days 16 days 15 days
Cadmium 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Chloroform 14 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Chloromethane 14 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Chromium 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Cobalt 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Copper 6 months 38 days 38 days 37 days 36 days
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chlori 14 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 11 days 11 days 10 days 9 days
Iron 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Lead rJ 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Manganese \-. 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Mercury 28 days 10 days 10 days 9 days 8 days
Molybdenum 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Naphthalene 14 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Nickel 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Nitrate, + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Selenium 6 months 17 days 17 days 16 days 15 days
Silver 6 months 37 days 37 days 36 days 35 days
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
TDS (mg/L) 7 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Thallium 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Tin 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Toluene 14 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Uranium 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
~ Vanadium 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Zinc 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Calcium 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Carbonate as C03 14 days 3 days 3 days 2 days 1 days
Cations BALANCE-W ----------
Magnesium 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Potassium 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
Sodium 6 months 23 days 23 days 22 days 21 days
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
.. ~. , U 1.1 • MW-11 MW-12 MW-14 I' QAP Holdmg MW-5
($j$$i*'x s~~~s1i~uent '" '4:'. ~ 1,2 Time 1'1.7112 l~lrtYj~ ,. 11l~7112:~~ ~I~ 11/27111 w_ _.".wff,
2-B utanone (MEK) 14 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Acetone 14 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Arsenic 6 months 23 days 11 days 23 days 23 days
Benzene 14 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Beryllium 6 months 17 days 11 days 22 days 22 days
Cadmium 6 months 23 days 11 days 23 days 23 days
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Chloroform 14 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Chloromethane 14 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Chromium 6 months 23 days 24 days 23 days 23 days
Cobalt 6 months 23 days 24 days 23 days 23 days
Copper I 6 months 38 days 53 days 38 days 38 days
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chlori 14 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 11 days 13 days 11 days 11 days
Iron 6 months 23 days 24 days 23 days 23 days
Lead 6 months 23 days 11 days 23 days 23 days
Manganese 6 months 23 days 24 days 23 days 23 days
Mercury 28 days ' 10 days 21 days 10 days 10 days
Molybdenum 6 months 23 days 24 days 23 days 23 days
Naphthalene . 14 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Nickel 6 months 23 days 24 days 23 days 23 days
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Selenium 6 months 17 days 11 days 22 days 22 days
Silver 6 months 37 days 52 days 37 days 37 days
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
TDS (mg/L) 7 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Thallium 6 months 23 days 11 days 23 days 23 days
Tin 6 months 23 days 24 days 23 days 23 days
Toluene 14 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Uranium 6 months 23 days . 11 days 23 days 23 days
Vanadium 6 months 23 days 24 days 23 days 23 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Zinc 6 months 23 days 24 days 23 days 23 days
Bicarbonate as HC03 ·14 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Calcium 6 months 23 days 24 days 23 days 23 days
Carbonate as C03 14 days 3 days 4 days 3 days 3 days
Cations BALANCE-W ----------
Magnesium 6 months 23 days 24 days 23 days 23 days
Potassium 6 months 23 days 24 days 23 days 23 days
Sodium 6 months 23 days 24 days 23 days 23 days
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
"" Y, ~. Wl'QNPHoldmg MWfIlS , MW~17 ~~ M;;}N48 ,~. MW-Ji~ }If
Constituenl Time 11/14J12 11/28112 .. ~ 111~6/12 12/1312012
.iI<f. ,:KW, N,
2-B utanone (MEK) 14 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Acetone 14 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Arsenic 6 months 9 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Benzene 14 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Beryllium 6 months 9 days 21 days 23 days 5 days
Cadmium 6 months 9 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Chloroform 14 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Chloromethane 14 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Chromium 6 months 22 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Cobalt 6 months 22 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Copper 6 months 51 days 37 days 39 days 22 days
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chlori 14 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 11 days 10 days 12 days 6 days
Iron 6 months 22 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Lead 6 months 9 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Manganese 6 months 22 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Mercury 28 days 19 days 9 days 11 days 5 days
Molybdenum 6 months 22 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Naphthalene 14 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Nickel 6 months 22 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Selenium 6 months 9 days 21 days 23 days 5 days
Silver 6 months 50 days 36 days 38 days 21 days
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
TDS (mg/L) 7 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Thallium 6 months 9 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Tin 6 months 22 days 22 days 24 days 6 days
Toluene 14 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Uranium 6 months 9 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Vanadium 6 months 22 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Zinc 6 months 22 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Calcium 6 months 22 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Carbonate as C03 14 days 2 days 2 days 4 days 1 days
Cations BALANCE-W ----------
Magnesium 6 months 22 days 22 days 24 days 5 days
Potassium 6 months 22 days 22 days 24 days 6 days
Sodium 6 months 22 days 22 days 24 days 6 days
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
" 'IIJ ''"'
III ~I~ MW-22 ~I I~' ~ Cl~p Rolfting M MW-23 ; NJW-2i1, ? j I~ 11/~6112 11129/12 " I) ,gCon~tituent Tim~w 12112112 12t~112 . .,w.
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Acetone 14 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Arsenic 6 months 6 days 57 days 13 days 21 days
Benzene 14 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Beryllium 6 months 6 days 23 days 13 days 20 days
Cadmium 6 months 6 days 25 days 13 days 21 days
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Chloroform 14 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Chloromethane 14 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Chromium 6 months 6 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Cobalt 6 months 6 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Copper 6 months 23 days 39 days 30 days 36 days
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chlori 14 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 7 days 12 days 10 days 9 days
Iron 6 months 6 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Lead 6 months 6 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Manganese 6 months 6 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Mercury 28 days 6 days 11 days 13 days 8 days
Molybdenum 6 months 6 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Naphthalene 14 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Nickel 6 months 6 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Selenium 6 months 6 days 23 days 13 days 20 days
Silver 6 months 22 days 38 days 29 days 35 days
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
TDS (mg/L) 7 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Thallium 6 months 6 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Tin 6 months 7 days 24 days --21 days
Toluene 14 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Uranium 6 months 6 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Vanadium 6 months 6 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Zinc 6 months 6 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Calcium 6 months 6 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Carbonate as C03 14 days 2 days 4 days 2 days 1 days
Cations BALANCE-W ----------
Magnesium 6 months 6 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Potassium 6 months 7 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
Sodium 6 months 7 days 24 days 13 days 21 days
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
-'9¥!P --·~-w-c·" prRR ill
~ QAPH~ldingl2 MW-25 M
"jW~ iil')<R:~ I;'" .. il!'~'''~
MW-27 MW .. 28
Constituent Time 11/12112 11/1511211 11113/12 r 11114/12
.~" .....
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Acetone 14 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
ksenic 6 months 11 days 8 days 10 days 9 days
Benzene 14 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Beryllium 6 months 11 days 8 days 10 days 9 days
Cadmium 6 months 11 days 8 days 10 days 9 days
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Chloroform 14 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Chloromethane 14 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Chromium 6 months 24 days 21 days 23 days 22 days
Cobalt 6 months 24 days 21 days 23 days 22 days
Copper 6 months 53 days 50 days 52 days 51 days
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chlori 14 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 13 days 10 days 12 days 11 days
Iron 6 months 24 days 21 days 23 days 22 days
Lead 6 months 11 days 8 days 10 days 9 days
Manganese 6 months 24 days 21 days 23 days 22 days
Mercury 28 days 21 days 18 days 20 days 19 days
Molybdenum 6 months 24 days 21 days 23 days 69 days
Naphthalene 14 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Nickel 6 months 24 days 21 days 23 days 22 days
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Selenium 6 months 11 days 8 days 10 days 9 days
Silver 6 months 52 days 49 days 51 days 50 days
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
TDS (mg/L) 7 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Thallium 6 months 11 days 8 days 10 days 9 days
Tin 6 months 71 days 21 days 70 days 69 days
Toluene 14 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Uranium 6 months 11 days 8 days 10 days 9 days
Vanadium 6 months 24 days 21 days 23 days 22 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Zinc 6 months 24 days 21 days 23 days 69 days
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Calcium 6 months 24 days 21 days 23 days 22 days
Carbonate as C03 14 days 4 days 1 days 3 days 2 days
Cations BALANCE-W
Magnesium 6 months 24 days 21 days 23 days 22 days
Potassium 6 months 24 days 21 days 23 days 22 days
Sodium 6 months 24 days 21 days 23 days 22 days
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
'li!' .'0/' 'r' <MY "'11' "-Y "WM I:·" .. -.... "II' 'ifJ:'~ "'r p fiP . §F¥P'lFfPA fid' 'ry,m ''1{1'-
'1'1 c~~titueDt ~AP 01 . g r.:, -29
'1<
MW-30 MW-31 MW-32 :r. i 112 :n{~112 Ill6112 " " llflf712 e I~ ¥O JJII.
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Acetone 14 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Arsenic 6 months 9 days 10 days 14 days 14 days
Benzene 14 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Beryllium 6 months 9 days 10 days 15 days 15 days
Cadmium 6 months 9 days 10 days 14 days 14 days
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Chloroform 14 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Chloromethane 14 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Chromium 6 months 22 days 23 days 22 days 22 days
Cobalt 6 months 22 days 23 days 22 days 22 days
Copper 6 months 51 days 52 days 59 days 59 days
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chlori 14 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 11 days 12 days 18 days 18 days
Iron 6 months 22 days 23 days 22 days 22 days
Lead 6 months 9 days 10 days 14 days 14 days
Manganese 6 months 22 days 23 days 22 days 22 days
Mercury 28 days 19 days 20 days 15 days 15 days
Molybdenum 6 months 22 days 23 days 22 days 22 days
Naphthalene 14 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Nickel 6 months 22 days 23 days 22 days 22 days
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Selenium 6 months 9 days 10 days 14 days 14 days
Silver 6 months 50 days 51 days 62 days 58 days
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
TDS (mg/L) 7 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Thallium 6 months 9 days 10 days 14 days 14 days
Tin 6 months 22 days 70 days 22 days 22 days
Toluene 14 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Uranium 6 months 9 days 10 days 15 days 15 days
Vanadium 6 months 22 days 23 days 22 days 22 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Zinc 6 months 22 days 23 days 22 days 22 days
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Calcium 6 months 22 days 23 days 22 days 22 days
Carbonate as C03 14 days 2 days 3 days 1 days 1 days
Cations BALANCE-W ----------
Magnesium 6 months 22 days 23 days 22 days 22 days
Potassium 6 months 22 days 23 days 22 days 22 days
Sodium 6 months 22 days 23 days 22 days 22 days
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
I"'" 'III !'Kll '-!'KWY~ "i¥Pfiffi''''' Mk ''t''; if "1;1 w_. '@~Mh¥ ',* wi,.«,; """wpr 'OH,H ,M ~""&E '$
QAP .olding" , MW-lS MW.:36 '~ MW-37 MW .. ~5 , Constituent 'fl!!}e 11I13/12 ,?#, 111l.~/lcP 12/5/12 11/2'1n2 ,'!Ie ,v, ,wA' 71& I lIfO YaftA '" /%,
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Acetone 14 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Arsenic 6 months 10 days 9 days 13 days 23 days
Benzene 14 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Beryllium 6 months 10 days 9 days 13 days 22 days
Cadmium 6 months 10 days 9 days 13 days 23 days
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Chloroform 14 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Chloromethane 14 .days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Chromium 6 months 23 days 22 days 13 days 23 days
Cobalt 6 months 23 days 22 days 13 days 23 days
Copper 6 months 52 days 51 days 30 days 38 days
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chlori 14 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 12 days 11 days 10 days 11 days
Iron 6 months 23 days 22 days 48 days 23 days
Lead 6 months 10 days 9 days 13 days 23 days
Manganese 6 months 23 days 22 days 48 days 23 days
Mercury 28 days 20 days 19 days 13 days 10 days
Molybdenum 6 months 23 days 22 days 48 days 23 days
Naphthalene 14 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Nickel 6 months 23 days 22 days 13 days 23 days
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Selenium 6 months 10 days 9 days 13 days 22 days
Silver 6 months 51 days 50 days 29 days 37 days
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
TDS (mg/L) 7 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Thallium 6 months 10 days 9 days 13 days 23 days
Tin 6 months 70 days 22 days 13 days 23 days
Toluene 14 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Uranium 6 months 10 days 9 days 13 days 23 days
Vanadium 6 months 23 days 22 days 13 days 23 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Zinc 6 months --22 days 48 days 23 days
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Calcium 6 months 23 days 22 days 13 days 23 days
Carbonate as C03 14 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 3 days
Cations BALANCE-W ----------
Magnesium 6 months 23 days 22 days 13 days 23 days
Potassium 6 months 23 days 22 days 13 days 23 days
Sodium 6 months 23 days 22 days 13 days 23 days
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation -&4&," •• l @*'"f4F",,: II!'Ifli" ."' .. ;ffr:
QAPHolding MW-70
Constituent Time 11/28112 f!li
'" .,.
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 2 days
Acetone 14 days 2 days
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 2 days
Arsenic 6 months 22 days
Benzene 14 days 2 days
Beryllium 6 months 21 days
Cadmium 6 months 22 days
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 2 days
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 2 days
Chloroform 14 days 2 days
Chloromethane 14 days 2 days
Chromium 6 months 22 days
Cobalt 6 months 22 days
Copper 6 months 37 days
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chlori 14 days 2 days
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days 2 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 10 days
Iron 6 months 22 days
Lead 6 months 22 days
Manganese 6 months 22 days
Mercury 28 days 9 days
Molybdenum 6 months 22 days
Naphthalene 14 days 2 days
Nickel 6 months 22 days
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 2 days
Selenium 6 months 21 days
Silver 6 months 36 days
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 2 days
TDS (mg/L) 7 days 2 days
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 2 days
Thallium 6 months 22 days
Tin 6 months 22 days
Toluene 14 days 2 days
Uranium 6 months 22 days
Vanadium 6 months 22 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days 2 days
Zinc 6 months 22 days
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days 2 days
Calcium 6 months 22 days
Carbonate as C03 14 days 2 days
Cations BALANCE-W ----
Magnesium 6 months 22 days
Potassium 6 months 22 days
Sodium 6 months 22 days
G-2B: Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
'''3 Q~P ""
tJI ~ Holding ~. MD-l1 ~W-t. MW-~5 '\ :Constituent TO ~ 10/23/12 10/23112 ".~ 1 0/2~/12 nne ." Jf', .. "''' ""
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days ------
Acetone 14 days ------
Benzene 14 days ------
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days ------
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days ------
Chloroform 14 days ------
Chloromethane 14 days ------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months ------
Manganese 6 months 11 days 11 days --
Naphthalene 14 days ------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days ------
Selenium 6 months ------
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days ------
TDS (mg/L) 7 days ------
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days ------
Thallium 6 months ------
Toluene 14 days ------
Uranium 6 months ----17 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days ------
G-2B: Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
I '. ~ • I Ill' @AP : "', I.
Holding MW-26 MW-30 MW-31
fiiJ Clitstit4ent ~ I. ':lime iA J:0/24112 ili I~ 1972311t I)W, 1012112012
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 1 days ----
Acetone 14 days 1 days ----
Benzene 14 days 1 days ----
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 1 days ----
Chloride (mg!L) 28 days 1 days 2 days 3 days
Chloroform 14 days 1 days ----
Chloromethane 14 days 1 days ----
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days 1 days ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months ------
Manganese 6 months ------
Naphthalene 14 days 1 days ----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 1 days 2 days 3 days
Selenium 6 months --16 days --
Sulfate (mg!L) 28 days ----3 days
TDS (mg!L) 7 days ----3 days
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 1 days ----
Thallium 6 months ------
Toluene 14 days 1 days ----
Uranium 6 months 15 days 16 days --
Xylenes (total) 14 days 1 days ----
G-2B: Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
" QAP
\i iiII 'l~ Holding @ MW-35 :t:-4S MWa ll roC
COl1&tituent f!!: Time 10/23/12 0123112 12/2&:41/12 . 'c.
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days ------
Acetone 14 days ------
Benzene 14 days ------
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days ------
Chloride (mgIL) 28 days ------
Chloroform 14 days ------
Chloromethane 14 days ------
Dichloromethane (Me thy lene Chloride) 14 days ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 16 days 46 days --
Manganese 6 months 11 days 52 days 7 days
Naphthalene 14 days ------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days ------
Selenium 6 months 16 days 50 days --
Sulfate (mgIL) 28 days ------
TDS (mgIL) 7 days ------
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days ------
Thallium 6 months 16 days 50 days --
Toluene 14 days ------
Uranium 6 months 16 days 52 days --
Xylenes (total) 14 days ------
G-2B: Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
iT i .Ifj I%~ ~1AP +x
Holding MW-14 MW-2S MW-26
CopstittJent i&i llime 12'rl8'/l: 1:li4tl:i · r¥1' 11!241:"1,
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days ------
Acetone 14 days ------
Benzene 14 days ------
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days ------
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days ----4 days
Chloroform 14 days ----4 days
Chloromethane 14 days ----4 days
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days ----4 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months ------
Manganese 6 months 9 days ----
Naphthalene 14 days ------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days ----4 days
Selenium 6 months ------
Sulfate (mgIL) 28 days ------
TDS (mgIL) 7 days ------
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days ----4 days
Thallium 6 months ------
Toluene 14 days ------
Uranium 6 months --II days 11 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days ------
G-2B: Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
G-2B: Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
I~ :~ .~ -"N 7t , "?: @iAtP I-i
Holding MW-65
Co~stittrent ;; -~{me 12111)112 ~
~y
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days --
Acetone 14 days --
Benzene 14 days --
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days --
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 5 days
Chloroform 14 days --
Chloromethane 14 days --
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days --
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months --
Manganese 6 months --
Naphthalene 14 days --
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 8 days
Selenium 6 months 9 days
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days --
TDS (mg/L) 7 days --
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days --
Thallium 6 months --
Toluene 14 days --
Uranium 6 months 9 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days --
G-3A: Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
Ii Sample Batch I' ~ Weirs in Batcli '" ·'tr '"'*llr T~lnpe'ahl~ "1.~ -~f ,xi
MW-01, MW-02, MW-03, MW-03A,
GEL 315987 MW-05, MW-12, MW-14, MW-17, NA MW-18, MW-22, MW-24, MW-65,
MW-70
MW-11, MW-15, MW-25, MW-26,
GEL 315400 MW-27, MW-28, MW-29, MW-30, NA
MW-35, MW-36
GEL 316780 MW-19, MW-20 NA
GEL 316515 MW-23, MW-37 NA
GEL 314781 MW-31, MW-32 NA
AW AL 1301421 * MW-22, MW-25, MW-27, MW-28, 2.1°C MW-30,MW-35,MW-37
MW-01, MW-02, MW-03, MW-03A,
AW AL 1211436 MW-05, MW-12, MW-14, MW-17, 1.6°C MW-18, MW-22, MW-24, MW-65,
MW-70
MW-11, MW-15, MW-25, MW-26,
AWAL 1211249 MW-27, MW-28, MW-29, MW-30, 2.rc
MW-35, MW-36
AWAL 1212308 MW-19, MW-20 1.9°C
AW AL 1212130 MW-23, MW-37 3.3°C
AWAL 1211109 MW-31, MW-32 3.1°C
N/A = These shipments contained samples for the analysis of metals and gross alpha only.
Per Table 1 in the approved QAP ,samples submitted for metals and gross alpha analyses do
not have a sample temperature requirement.
*AW AL 1301421 is the analysis of select metals in these wells due to matrix interferences
G-3B: Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check -Accelerated Samples
dW K Sa:~ple Batch '" 'WI ~~ 'm¥' ",,'_ Wells in Bafch ,m" ""!II' If femperafurl
JP
GEL 313984 ~VV-11,~VV-14,~VV-25,~VV-26,~VV-30, 4.0°C
~VV-35
GEL 316260 ~VV-65 4.0°C
AVVAL 1210420 ~VV-26,~VV-30,~VV-31 1.3°C
GEL 317317 NA
~VV-11,~VV-25,~VV-26,~VV-30,~VV-65
GEL 317215 ~VV-14, ~VV-35 NA
A VV AL 1212580 ~VV-26,~VV-30,~VV-65 2.2 °C
A VV AL 1212473 ~VV-31 2.7 °C
G-4A: Analytical Method Check
·,,,w~~: Par(fneter ~ ;~.'t,:W4 'Wk '. I'r:!!,~ QAP;~~tbod* .! ·.~~I" Nfe'tlio(l uSe(Jiby[1tiB
Ammonia (as N) A4500-NH3 G or E350.1 A4500-NH3 G
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) E353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
Metals E200.7 or E200.8 E200.7 and E200.8
Gross Alpha E900.0 or E900.1 E900.1
VOCs SW8260B or SW8260C SW8260C
Chloride A4500-CI B or A4500-CI E or E300.0 E300.0
Fluoride A4500-F C or E300.0 E300.0
Sulfate A4500-S04 E or E300.0 E300.0
TDS A2540C A2540C
Carbonate as C03, Bicarbonate as HC03 A2320B A2320B
Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium E200.7 E200.7
Tetrahydrofuran and tin were analyzed by American West Analytical Laboratories. All other constituents were analyzed by Energy Laboratories.
* QAP Revisions 7.1 and 7.2 expanded the allowable anlaytical metods. Those methods are listed here as they are applicable to samples collected after the approval dates of May 30, 2012 and June 7, 2012
respectively. Samples collected prior to the approval of the revised QAP (Revisions 7.1 nad 7.2 were analyzed using the methods specified in QAP revision 6.
". J
G-4B: Analytical Method Check -Accelerated Samples
*~~J{«b[«I~
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) E353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
Metals E200.7 or E200.8 E200.7 or E200.8
Gross Alpha E900.0 or E900.1 E900.1
VOCs SW8260B or SW8260C SW8260C
Chloride A4500-CI B or A4500-CI E or E300.0 E300.0
Sulfate A4500-S04 E or E300.0 E300.0
TDS A2540C A2540C
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
;J '11#1 'w, '" 7'~' IiIftM: I~M'~ ''''.f1 '" ,.~ MWlf ME ." m ... ~ ·~!i f$k.~iI& O/f:{~" Mwn) :1" f:!l/,E,
¥ !!ft,
Ii! ,l! 11/2712912 J 1l2'/2012 11128/2012 ",.
'!I I., .. ~ .~ Wd J fl'9 .w". I~ : .. ~ .. 'SYA llil W£ ~f~:
QAP Reporting , "
d%'{~ ,::.:J!~ .Qo~fjtue~t _ .4. La .at ~
•• .,cOI II!!! f<A .!L 4®Q9aytler @d$~ .&k Qualijer. ,,,,flY-5.1\ QufI!t'L~r
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 JlgIL 20 ugIL 20 ugIL 20 ugIL
Acetone 20 JlgIL 20 ugIL 20 ug/l:,-20 ugIL
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL
Arsenic 5JlgIL 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U
Benzene 1.0 JlgIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Beryllium 0.50 JlgIL 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Cadmium 0.50 JlgIL 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugiL U O.5ugIL
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0JlgIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloride (mgIL) 1 mgIL 10 mgIL 1 mgIL 10mgIL
Chloroform 1.0 JlgIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloromethane 1.0 JlgIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chromium 25 JlgIL 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U
Cobalt 10 JlgIL 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Copper 10 JlgIL 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL
Oichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0JlgIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC 1.0 pCilL 1.0 pCiIL 1.0 pCiIL 1.0 pCilL
Iron 30 JlgIL 30 ugiL 30 ugIL U 30 ugiL U
Lead 1.0JlgIL 1 ugIL U 1 ugIL U 1 uglL U
Manganese 10 JlgIL 10 ugIL 10 ugiL U 10 ugIL
Mercury 0.50 JlglL 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Molybdenum 10 JlgIL 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugiL U
Naphthalene 1.0JlgIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Nickel 20 JlgIL 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mgIL 0.1 MGIL 0.1 MGIL 0.1 MGIL
Selenium 5 JlgIL 5ugIL U 5 ugIL 5 ugIL
Silver 10 JlgIL 10 ugIL U 10 uglL U 10 ugIL U
Sulfate (mgIL) 1 mgIL 100mgIL 1000 mgIL 1000 mgIL
TOS (mgIL) 10mgIL 20MGIL 20MGIL 20MGIL
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 JlgIL 1 uglL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Thallium 0.50 JlgIL 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL
Tin 100 JlgIL 100 ugIL U 100 ugIL U 100 ugIL U
Toluene 1.0JlgIL 1 ugIL lugiL 1 ugIL
Uranium 0.30 JlgIL 0.3 ugiL U 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL
Vanadium 15 JlgIL 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U
Xylenes (total) 1.0JlgIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Zinc 10 JlglL 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mgIL 1 mglL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Calcium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mglL 0.5 mgIL
Carbonate as C03 1 mglL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Magnesium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mglL 0.5 mgIL
Potassium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mglL 0.5 mgIL
Sodium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
G-5A· Routine Reporting Limit Check
"*N ~:3A ~ MW.S ~MW.l1 'A'
-"", ,~, ciS,
111111 11/~9/2012 J&;a " 1~~7t12012 1 1/1212012 ,m, "
,pJill w ~[ III YW:I~ ".~ilil cr. ~ flf~'ii
@I
.>" Constituent: RL Qualifier RL .7,r~ "Qualifi~! RL Qua.lifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20ugIL 20 ugIL 20 ugIL
Acetone 20ugIL 20 uglL 20 ugIL
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL
Arsenic 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U
Benzene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Beryllium 0.5 uglI,. 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ugIL U
Cadmium 0.5 ugIL 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloride (mgIL) 10mgIL 10 mgIL 10 mgIL
Chloroform 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloromethane 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chromium 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U
Cobalt 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Copper 10 ugIL 10 uglL U 10 ugIL U
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL 1.0pCiIL 1.0 pCiIL
Iron 30 ugIL U 30ugIL 30 ugIL
Lead 1 ugIL U 1 ugIL U 1uglL U
Manganese 10 ugIL 10 ugIL 10 ugIL
Mercury 0.5 ugIL U O.5ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Molybdenum 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Naphthalene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Nickel 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 MGIL 0.1 MGIL 0.1 MGIL
Selenium 5 uglL 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U
Silver 10 ugIL U 10 uglL U 10 ugIL U
Sulfate (mgIL) 1000 mgIL 100 mgIL 100 mgIL
TDS (mglL) 20MGIL 20MGIL 20MGIL
Tetrahydrofuran 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Thallium 0.5 ugIL 0.5 ugIL U O.5ugIL U
Tin 100 ugIL U 100 ugIL U 100 ugIL U
Toluene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Uranium 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL
Vanadium 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U
Xylenes (total) 1uglL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Zinc 10 ugIL 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Calcium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Carbonate as C03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Magnesium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Potassium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Sodium 1 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 1 mgIL
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
" MW-12
.u, MW-14 " l\tW-lS ~,
'%I U/~7/2012 .~ ,;7&., w /; JJ,,2712012 .~!{!. .m ;; •• #11/1412012
I~ ~'C r17~ ,., III ··~raw. '*71 ,,; ,a'iJi11 ill
.@j Iff
Constituent 'g IW. RL ._, Qualifier;, Rt ,~ Q~iIif~r RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 ugIL 20 ugIL 20 ugIL
Acetone 20 ugIL 20 ugIL 20 ugIL
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL
Arsenic 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U 5ugIL U
Benzene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Beryllium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Cadmium 0.5 ugIL U O.5ugIL 0.5 ugIL U
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloride (mgIL) 10mgIL 10 mgIL 10 mgIL
Chloroform 1 ugIL 1 uglL 1 ugIL
Chloromethane 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chromium 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U
Cobalt 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Copper 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL 0
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL 1.0 pCiIL 1.0 pCiIL
Iron 30 ugIL U 30 ugIL U 30 ugIL U
Lead 1 ugIL U 1 ugIL U 1 uglL U
Manganese 10 ugIL 10 ugIL 10 ugIL U
Mercury 0.5 ugIL U O.5ugIL U 0.5 uglL U
Molybdenum 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Naphthalene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Nickel 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 MGIL 0.1 MGIL 0.1 MGIL
Selenium 5 ugIL 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL 0
Silver 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Sulfate (mgIL) 1000 mgIL 1000 mgIL 1000 mgIL
TDS (mgIL) 20MGIL 20MGIL 20MG/L
Tetrahydrofuran 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 uglL
Thallium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Tin 100 ugIL U 100 ugIL U 100 ugIL U
Toluene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Uranium 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL 0
Vanadium 15ugIL U 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U
Xylenes (total) 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Zinc 10 ug/L U 10 ugIL 10 ugIL U
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Calcium 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0
Carbonate as C03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Magnesium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0
Potassium 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0
Sodium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
V%&¥% 'rI~ '-;-*" Pi! W/Ii ~ MW-t7 @ l l:~ "mfr·' .· .. :·w~"· ,K& _:,7& Mw!i9 '?:dm MW;,l:S
"r Ilt~~2012 11,126/20,}:2 ~, ~w!&12/13/2012
! '''~',. 10 ""'I:l'
" 'T r'~ '~,.~ " ."W< ,. :"~i/ilP.
,,$';7., '1'P~. Co~ttl!.enJ _ ',73 wiII<" M:, ~RL Qu,aUJier :$ollL .eikII. Q,alifier.~ lU-" , Jlualifj;tt:jJ
2-Butanone (MEK) 20ugIL 20ugIL 20 ugIL
Acetone 20ugIL 20 ugIL 20 ugIL
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL
Arsenic 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U
Benzene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Beryllium O.5ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Cadmium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 ugIL 1 ug/L 1 ugIL
Chloride (mgIL) 10 mgIL 10 mgIL 10 mgIL
Chloroform 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloromethane 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chromium 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U
Cobalt 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Copper 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL 1.0_pCiIL 1.0 pCilL
Iron 30 ugIL U 30 ugIL 30 ugIL U
Lead 1 ugIL U 1 ugIL U 1 ugIL U
Manganese 10 ugIL 0 10 ugIL 10 ugiL
Mercury 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Molybdenum 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Naphthalene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Nickel 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 MGIL 0.1 MGIL 1 MGIL
Selenium 5 ugIL 0 5ugIL U 5 ugIL
Silver 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Sulfate (mgIL) 1000 mgIL 1000 mgIL 100 mgIL
TDS (mgIL) 20MGIL 20MGIL 20MGIL
Tetrahydrofuran 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Thallium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL 0.5 uglL
Tin 100 ugIL U 100 ugIL U 100 ugIL U
Toluene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Uranium 0.3 ugiL 0 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL
Vanadium 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U
Xylenes (total) 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Zinc 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Calcium 0.5 mgIL 0 1 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Carbonate as C03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mglL
Magnesium 0.5 mgIL 0 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mglL
Potassium 0.5 mgtL 0 1 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Sodium 1 mgIL 0 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
G-5A· Routine Reporting Limit Check
-" MW-20 l' MW-22 '?% ' MW-2'3 . ~f,i . • 12/f~~2012 . ~, . lJl26/2012.~ ..
:~ :~ r WEP· ~.i' ~ Iii: IIJj
Iii. ~ .%
"4 Constituent RL Qualifier RE ."'. Quali1ier 1U" Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 ugIL 20 ugIL 20 ugIL
Acetone 20 ugIL 20ugIL 20 ugIL
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL
Arsenic 5 ugIL U 5ugIL 5 ugIL U
Benzene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Beryllium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL 0.5 uglL U
Cadmium 0.5 ugIL U 1.1ugIL 0.5 ugIL U
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloride (mgIL) 10 mglL 10mgIL 1 mgIL
Chloroform 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloromethane 1uglL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chromium 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U
Cobalt 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL 10 ugIL U
Copper 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL 10 ugIL U
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.1 mgIL 1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL 1.0 pCiIL 1.0 pCiIL
Iron 30 ugIL U 30 ugIL 30 ugIL U
Lead 1 ugIL U 1 ugIL 1uglL U
Manganese 10 ugIL U 20ugIL 10 ugIL
Mercury 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Molybdenum 10 ugIL 10 ugIL 10 ugIL U
Naphthalene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Nickel 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL 20 ugIL U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 2MGIL 1MGIL 0.1 MGIL
Selenium 5 ugIL 5ugIL 5 ugIL U
Silver 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Sulfate (mgIL) 1000 mglL 1000 mgIL 1000 mgIL
TDS (mgIL) 20MGIL 100MGIL 20MGIL
Tetrahydrofuran I ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Thallium O.5ugIL U 0.5 ugIL 0.5 ugIL
Tin 100 ugIL U 100 ugIL U ----
Toluene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Uranium 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL
Vanadium 15 ugIL 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U
Xylenes (total) 1uglL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Zinc 10 ugIL 10 ugIL 10 ugIL
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Calcium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Carbonate as C03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mglL
Magnesium 0.5 mgIL 1.1 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Potassium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Sodium 1 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mglL
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
'", MW-24 !il MW-25 MW-26 e",
" ~ 11~~ il" 11112'/2012 .;' 11115120!~ ,;p,
11 1;;'.11 'f¢1 ~lr';<!4/ i' ,e ~~&I ; e,?., w£ '"" '4£ "~
I' 'I'
I¥~ Co~tl!uent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier RL -"-';!,, QuaJifier
2-B utanone (MEK) 20ugIL 20 ugIL 20 ugIL
Acetone 20 uglL 20 ugIL 20 ugIL
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL
Arsenic 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U
Benzene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Beryllium O.5ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Cadmium 0.5 ugIL 0 0.5 ugIL 0 0.5 ugIL U
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloride (mgIL) 10 mgIL 10 mgIL 10 mgIL
Chloroform 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 100 ugIL
Chloromethane 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chromium 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U
Cobalt 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Copper 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0pCiIL 1.0 pCiIL 1.0 pCiIL
Iron 30 ugIL 0 30 ugIL U 30 ugIL 0
Lead 1 ugIL U 1 ugIL U 1uglL U
Manganese 10 ugIL 0 10 ugIL 0 10 ugIL 0
Mercury 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Molybdenum 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL 0 10 ugIL U
Naphthalene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Nickel 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 MGIL 0.1 MGIL 0.1 MGIL
Selenium 5 ugIL U 5ugIL U 5 ugIL 0
Silver 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Sulfate (mgIL) 1000 mgIL 100 mgIL 100 mgIL
TDS (mgIL) 20MGIL 20MGIL 20MGIL
Tetrahydrofuran 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Thallium O.5ugIL 0 0.5 ugIL 0 0.5 ugIL U
Tin 100 ugIL U 100 ugIL 100 ugIL U
Toluene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Uranium 0.3 ugIL 0 0.3 ugIL 0 0.3 ugIL 0
Vanadium 15 ugIL U 15 uglL U 15 ugIL U
Xylenes (total) 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Zinc 10 ugIL 0 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL 0
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Calcium 0.5 mgIL 0 0.5 mglL 0 0.5 mgIL 0
Carbonate as C03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Magnesium 0.5 mgIL 0 0.5 mgIL 0 0.5 mgIL 0
Potassium 0.5 mgIL 0 0.5 mgIL 0 0.5 mgIL 0
Sodium 1 mgIL 0 0.5 mgIL 0 0.5 mglL 0
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
',w ~<'Jil!' '" rn _~"" '0M"'~' ¥Ti 'w'· ~<MW.~~(1 ,7!' 'j!j!'i'. ~ ,1'~Mw:.ri8},w ,~. "J%~" f,~ ~t;:MW:~ V , '';,
IJI13/2012 'il 11/14/2012 1111412&12 .""
~:..,. ,?,
:¥I .. ,(@ ~'!I!4 .1$ '( ,{" n It .J "'@~ iff
,,yj!j!'i,, Y7~_~ons1ijpent ~~_ . Y._."""", .W4)ffi;~ I",., Qualifier. RL .iff 1@ 9ualyjer 1.1>, ~:.y", 9,!~e~ J\ . "·rf'fj'./%'! P;
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 ugIL 20 ug/L 20 ugIL
Acetone 20 ugIL 20 ugIL 20 ugIL
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mgIL 0.1 mgIL 0.05 mgIL
Arsenic 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL 5 ugIL U
Benzene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Beryllium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Cadmium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ug/L 0.5 ugIL U
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloride (mglL) 10mgIL 10 mgIL 10 mgIL
Chloroform 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloromethane 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chromium 25 ugIL U 25 ug/L U 25 ugIL U
Cobalt 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL 10 ugIL U
Copper 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL 10 ugIL U
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1 ugIL luglL 1 ugIL
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL 1.0 pCi/L 1.0 pCi/L
Iron 30 ugIL U 30 uglL U 30 ugIL
Lead 1 ugIL U 1 ugIL U 1 ugIL U
Manganese 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL 10 ugIL
Mercury O.5ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 uglL U
Molybdenum 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL 10 ugIL U
Naphthalene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Nickel 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL 20 ugIL U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 1 MGIL 0.1 MGIL 0.1 MGIL
Selenium 5 ugIL 0 5 ugIL U 5ugIL U
Silver 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Sulfate (mgIL) 100mgIL 1000 mgIL 1000 mgIL
TDS (mgIL) 20MGIL 20MGIL 20MGIL
Tetrahydrofuran 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Thallium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL O.5ugIL U
Tin 100 ugIL 100 ugIL 100 ugIL U
Toluene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Uranium 0.3 ugIL 0 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL
Vanadium 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U
Xylenes (total) 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Zinc 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL 10 ugIL
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Calcium 0.5 mgIL 0 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Carbonate as C03 1 mglL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Magnesium 0.5 mgIL 0 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Potassium 0.5 mg/L 0 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Sodium 0.5 mgIL 0 1 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW';30 'MW·31 " MW.3if
.ii, ,g . .. ...
'-'0,*,-1:.,1:, 11/1~j2012 ~ t116/2012 B! •. '.'0 .. '.'0 .1116/2012
!r0~~ .~~ '00 • ~~"'-'@
'f;, Constituent RL QuaIifier .~. RL QuaJitl~r fRL Q!;!alifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 ugIL 20 ugIL 20 ugIL
Acetone 20 uglL 20 uglL 20 ugIL
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mglL 0.05 mgIL 0.05 mgIL
Arsenic 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U 5 uglL U
Benzene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Beryllium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Cadmium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 uglL
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloride (mgIL) 100 mgIL 100 mgIL 10 mgIL
Chloroform 1uglL 1 ugIL 1uglL
Chloromethane 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chromium 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U
Cobalt 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL
Copper 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Oichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC 1.0 pCi/L 1.0 pCi/L 1.0 pCi/L
Iron 30 ugIL 30 ugIL U 30 ugIL
Lead 1 ugIL U 1 ugIL U 1 ugIL U
Manganese 10 ugIL 10 ug/L U 10 ugIL
Mercury 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Molybdenum 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Naphthalene 1uglL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Nickel 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 1MGIL 10MGIL 0.1 MGIL
Selenium 5 ugIL 5 ugIL 5 ugIL U
Silver 10 uglL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Sulfate (mgIL) 100 mgIL 100 mgIL 1000 mgIL
TOS (mgIL) 20MGIL 20MGIL 20MGIL
Tetrahydrofuran 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Thallium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 uglL U
Tin 100 ugIL 100 ugIL U 100 ugIL U
Toluene 1uglL 1 uglL 1 ugIL
Uranium 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL
Vanadium 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U
Xylenes (total) 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 uglL
Zinc 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 uglL
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Calcium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mglL
Carbonate as C03 1 mgIL 1 mg/L 1 mgIL
Magnesium 0.5 mglL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Potassium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Sodium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
i\,"! • eel
.''''"
r"il''''e IllS: », M;.3~~jSj ,~ .~ IrMwtl~ 7?: ~ rl If .. irI",JMW3i ;~-
jJlIl~12012 : @/ h/14120i2 'fA' 12/5/2012. en, ~ ,C(& "" "" %Jif!4'~ .' "Jrfl ," y~ .. J' • i~ 91J~ ~)
itt: € ;m-" ,<fj I&! 0 titoent
p, 1111 ,n iWl ,~ j~ QU'!ltfier RI:!", &!~ualifier «1 ~'9 ... Qualiti~rj '. j .,
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 ugIL 20 ugIL 20 ugIL
Acetone 20 ugIL 20 ugiL 20 ugIL
Ammonia (as N) 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL
Arsenic 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U
Benzene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Beryllium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Cadmium 0.5 ugIL U 05ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloride (mgIL) 10 mgIL 10 mgIL 10 mgIL
Chloroform 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloromethane 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chromium 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U 25 ugIL U
Cobalt 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Copper 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1 ugIL 1uglL 1 ugIL
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0pCilL 1.0 pCiIL 1.0 pCiIL
Iron 30 ugIL 30 ugIL U 30 ugIL
Lead 1 ugIL U 1 ug/L U 1 ugIL U
Manganese 10 ugIL 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL
Mercury 0.5 ugiL U 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Molybdenum 10 ugIL 10 ugIL U 10 ugiL
Naphthalene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Nickel 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 MGIL 0.1 MGIL 0.1 MG/L
Selenium 5 ugIL 5 ugIL 5 ugIL U
Silver 10 uglL U 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Sulfate (mgIL) 1000 mgIL 1000 mgIL 1000 mgIL
TDS (mgIL) 20MGIL 20MGIL 20MGIL
Tetrahydrofuran 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Thallium 0.5 ugiL 0.5 ugIL 0.5 ugIL U
Tin 100 ugIL 100 ugIL U 100 ugIL U
Toluene 1 uglL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Uranium 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL
Vanadium 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U 15 ugIL U
Xylenes (total) 1 ugIL 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Zinc ----10 ugIL U 10 ugIL
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Calcium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Carbonate as C03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Magnesium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 1.1mgIL
Potassium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mglL
Sodium 1 mgIL 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
1 ',"!fi!?%'Z .~wl' W,,"9 wv """,,,,z W#'4'411 ',,", W::0 MW~S ,*",54 Mftrl! "iI~ -j()"W~5~' 0. "'1 ,w.
.~ 11/2712012 '/ ly~8/2012;'B' k.
I!! j V~~ 1\4 ''''',' "". ,WI :'f~ J
,',
;'
.8.,,"0. $~2q~titu~Dj .~ .pM QuaJjf~); RL wi", QJzql!fier;pJ ~ ,1ffII, -"', ,"",,!'l9; "-"'" W4ffi
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 ugIL 20 ugIL
Acetone 20 ugIL 20 ugIL
Ammonia (as N) 0.1 mgIL 0.05 mgIL
Arsenic 5 ugIL U 5 ugIL U
Benzene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Beryllium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Cadmium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chloride (mglL) 1 mgIL 10 mgIL
Chloroform 1 ugIL 1 uglL
Chloromethane 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Chromium 25 uglL U 25 ugIL U
Cobalt 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Copper 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1uglL 1 ugIL
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mgIL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL 1.0 pCiIL
Iron 30 ugIL U 30 ugIL U
Lead 1 ugIL U 1 ugIL U
Manganese 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL
Mercury 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 ugIL U
Molybdenum 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Naphthalene 1 ugIL 1 uglL
Nickel 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 MGIL 0.1 MGIL
Selenium 5 ugIL 5ugIL
Silver 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Sulfate (mgIL) 1000 mgIL 1000 mgIL
TDS (mglL) 20MGIL 20MGIL
Tetrahydrofuran 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Thallium 0.5 ugIL U 0.5 uglL U
Tin 100 ugIL U 100 ugIL U
Toluene 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Uranium 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ugIL
Vanadium 15 uglL U 15 ugIL U
Xylenes (total) 1 ugIL 1 ugIL
Zinc 10 ugIL U 10 ugIL U
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mglL 1 mgIL
Calcium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Carbonate as C03 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
Magnesium 0.5 mglL 0.5 mgIL
Potassium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
Sodium 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
G-5B: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
'7Y&. c~*" '~' '~"" y:-"iii-wy '@% «FA N41 I'W' • tf'",!~Y '. MW!11101)3112 ~~,~fA #7' MWl14 lO/Jrt~ll I;fA.
,w'
'w#
• ~ QAB .. Repor,tlng 1m !II " fA" ' Iii
Qualifier Constituent Uimit RL Qualifier RL ,$ ,"L y-~, ,",w_
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 ~gIL --------
Acetone 20 ~glL --------
Benzene 1.0~gIL --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0~gIL --------
Chloride (mgIL) 1 mglL --------
Chloroform 1.0~gIL --------
Chloromethane 1.0~gIL --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0~gIL --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL ------
Manganese 10 ~gIL 10 ugIL --10 ugIL --
Naphthalene 1.0~gIL --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mgIL --------
Selenium 5~gIL --------
Sulfate (mgIL) 1 mgIL --------
TDS (mgIL) 10 mgIL --------
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0~gIL --------
Thallium 0.50 f-t&L_ --------
Toluene 1.0~gIL --------
Uranium 0.30 ~gIL --------
Xylenes (total) 1.0 ~gIL --------
G-SB: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
q MW-2~ 41912012 '&/ MW-2610/24/f2 'q
I} IiiI 2',c %/
'-M '·&0 Ii!} IfiPA "l0
I'· I!! ;!l.
;. '0 ,,_ % Constituent "J!l} _ .""7""~.%!" ''r ~Q9aYjiet, ;m ~ 0"iW&~ .W4'#; firM ,.fum Q~~if!~r
2-Butanone (MEK) ----20ugIL U
Acetone ----20 ugIL U
Benzene ----I ugIL U
Carbon Tetrachloride ----I ugIL U
Chloride (mgIL) ----I mgIL U
Chloroform ----200ugIL
Chloromethane ----I ugIL U
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) ----I UGIL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC ----
Manganese --------
Naphthalene ----I ugIL U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) ----I MGIL
Selenium --------
Sulfate (mgIL) --------
TDS (mgIL) --------
Tetrahydrofuran ----I ugIL U
Thallium --------
Toluene ----I ugIL U
Uranium 0.3 ugIL --0.3 ugIL
Xylenes (total) ----I ugIL U
G-5B: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
¢l! ~:3q 10/23/1'2 n" @ff ~ "'1$}. ''*4» MW .i31101Z~12
1'£ '~ u*, '~ n
0~
n I~
,if} ,51$" ,,%, .~onstitti~nt RL Qualjfier * RL ~QuaVfi~r , 7-
2-Butanone (MEK) --------
Acetone --------
Benzene --------
Carbon Tetrachloride --------
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L 100 mg/L --
Chloroform --------
Chloromethane --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) --------
Gross Alp_ha minus Rn & U MDC ----
Manganese --------
Naphthalene --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 1 MGIL lOMGIL
Selenium 5ug/L ------
Sulfate (mg/L) ----75 mg/L
TDS (mg/L) ----20MGIL --
Tetrahydrofuran --------
Thallium --------
Toluene --------
Uranium 0.3 ug/L ------
Xylenes (total) --------
G-5B: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
mr 'iiffj "MW-3510/231l2 "'W MW-6'510/231l!2
~ ,!II , l~ ~ '!l'~ " "
\Ii ~
Qualitltt!-"
,
Qualilie; Co~tituent RL I," ~ ,~ ",,," "", :t'
2-Butanone (MEK) --------
Acetone --------
Benzene --------
Carbon Tetrachloride --------
Chloride (mgIL) --------
Chloroform --------
Chloromethane --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL 1.0 pCilL
Manganese 10 ugIL --10 ugIL --
Na~hthalene --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) --------
Selenium 5 ugIL --5 ugIL --
Sulfate (mgIL) --------
IDS (mgIL) --------
Tetrah ydrofuran --------
Thallium 0.5 ugIL --0.5 ugIL --
Toluene --------
Uranium 0.3 ugIL --0.3 uglL --
Xylenes (total) --------
G-5B: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
•. '" .~ MW-1112/24/12 ;;" 'U"MU}fW!14 1~/18112 1m -', "" r' • ~ • Ir .;1
,
iii @
COJ1.Stitu~nt ,L Qual!fier I~ .. RB ·ifI QUalifier ilfMY d'" ~ "", .iIf
2-Butanone (MEK) --------
Acetone --------
Benzene --------
Carbon Tetrachloride --------
Chloride (mg/L) --------
Chloroform --------
Chloromethane --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC ------
Manganese 10 ug/L lOug/L --
Naphthalene --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) --------
Selenium --------
Sulfate (mglL) --------
TDS (mg/L) --------
Tetrahydrofuran --------
Thallium --------
Toluene --------
Uranium --------
Xylenes (total) --------
G-SB: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
'" #h' ili mT MW-25 12/24/12 '0/# MW-2ii 1 !724/1 2 '0/#
ww;
~ ~~ " 0'$%" '''' '1& BM '!¥r, • • • '-,
;~ 1I!fi ~,~I~
PI ~o~~tu~nt· #J' "':
, f, ~~RL,y ,Qqa;lUil'el," ~.f& ~'" .~, • Q~jlUtleI:?'@ •
2-Butanone (MEK) --------
Acetone --------
Benzene --------
Carbon Tetrachloride --------
Chloride (mgIL) ----10 mgIL
Chloroform ----20ugIL
Chloromethane ----I ugIL
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) ----I ugIL --
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC ----
Manganese --------
Naphthalene --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) ----0.1 MGIL --
Selenium --------
Sulfate (mgIL) --------
TDS (mgIL) --------
Tetrahydrofuran ----I ugIL
Thallium --------
Toluene --------
Uranium 0.3 ugIL --0.3 ugIL 0
Xylenes (total) --------
G-5B: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
'''" w MW-30 12126/12 ee", MW-3112118/12
1;P .' !ill ~ ,
14 '$
QuaUfier ConStituent RL Qudlifier XL ~
,1, L£ce
2-Butanone (MEK) --------
Acetone --------
Benzene --------
Carbon Tetrachloride --------
Chloride (mg/L) 100 mg/L --100 mg/L --
Chloroform --------
Chloromethane --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) --------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC ----
Manganese --------
Naphthalene --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 1 MGIL lOMGIL
Selenium 5 ug/L ------
Sulfate (mg/L) ----100 mg/L
TDS (mg/L) ----20MGIL
Tetrahydrofuran --------
Thallium --------
Toluene --------
Uranium 0.3 ug/L ------
Xylenes (total) --------
G-5B: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
'I' uu,",,' o/{',,;r.' II ",,' MWiJ512118Jl1' '''' MWt~S 12126112; i/t,
,,;17#' R~:. I~.! ~ QU~ ,OJ ~'M, .~!*, GODS \ ~'I,I "Qi:JIJJjer RL.~, ":1
2-Butanone (MEK) --------
Acetone --------
Benzene --------
Carbon Tetrachloride --------
Chloride (mg/L) ----100 mg/L --
Chloroform --------
Chloromethane --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) --------
Gross Al~ha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCiIL --
Manganese 10 ug/L ------
Naphthalene --------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) ----lMGIL
Selenium 5 ug/L --5 ug/L --
Sulfate (mg/L) --------
TDS (mg/L) --------
Tetrahydrofuran --------
Thallium 0.5 ug/L 0 ----
Toluene --------
Uranium 0.3 ug/L --0.3 ug/L --
Xylenes (total) --------
G-6A: Trip Blank Evaluation
All trip blanks for the 2012 Fourth Quarter samples were non detect.
,}Jlailk SamDl~Date 'm' Labor~tory ,,' dll"
1 11/612012 American West Analytical Laboratories
2 1111212012 American West Analytical Laboratories
3 1112612012 American West Analytical Laboratories
4 12/512012 American West Analytical Laboratories
5 12/12/2012 American West Analytical Laboratories
G-6B: Trip Blank Evaluation
All trip blanks for the Accelerated samples were non detect.
BlaIlI Samlilen>Date 4Ibw '#!#' Labora~~ry G
1 1012412012 American West Analytical Laboratories
2 12/2412012 American West Analytical Laboratories
G-7 A: QAlQC Evaluation for Routine Sample Duplicates
%~l)
Selenium 15.5 30.48
Uranium 13.9 5.93
Chloride (mg/L) 7.24 6.8 6.27
Fluoride (mg/L) 0.262 0.286 8.76
Bicarbonate as HC03 310 310 0.00
Calcium 330 316 4.33
Magnesium 92.4 88.6 4.20
Potassium 10.5 9.98 5.08
Sodium 506 515 1.76
TDS (mg/L) 2960 3010 1.68
Sulfate (mg/L) 1640 1470 10.93
Co~titq~J\t .wca, c4%, .&@ ,_41" ~c ., .iI!!! .• ,,* "'. MW-17 MW-7!t,. .",.%RPD
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 1.44 1.44 0.00
Copper 10 10.3 2.96
Manganese 74.5 74.9 0.54
Selenium 17.3 16.6 4.13
Uranium 23.5 23.3 0.85
Chloride (mg/L) 38.7 39.8 2.80
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.197 0.226 13.71
Bicarbonate as HC03 372 365 1.90
Calcium 327 329 0.61
Magnesium 156 156 0.00
Potassium 11.6 11.7 0.86
Sodium 524 552 5.20
TDS (mg/L) 3620 3540 2.23
Sulfate (mg/L) 1570 1420 10.03
Ratliolo~c Dullicai~ Tests ~ I¥ "" '" ~ jiI'~, jill • Y' .iI!!!. .. '''.x 'iii
Gross Alpha minus Rn & u* ND ND NA
* Duplicate checks reported for gross alpha minus RN and U are not %RPD. Calculated values are
based on the formula in the approved QAP.
Per the approved QAP, an RPD greater than 20% is acceptable if the reported results are less than 5 times the RL.
These results are provided for information only.
G-7B: QAlQC Evaluation for Accelerated Sample Duplicates
.,.. MW-35 MW':~5 i;f
'*, fl. lI', Cq:nstjtqent U4f" "iii ;l!: r~· I;D/23t!~ %4. !9J2311j APf~i~ %R:PD* ,$4= ,~,
Manganese 253 248 2.00
Selenium 19 18.4 3.21
Thallium 0.517 0.68 27.23
Uranium 22.4 23.7 5.64
,$IWI 1m BadiolQgic ~D Tests.
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 4.31 5.84 ,~':' IJ~8' ",
"
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 0.409 0.706
~,L ., , ~: ''>\ " "%, .'"
* Duplicate Ghecks reported f~F gross fllpha minms RN amd U .arenot %RPD. ,Calculated values are based on
the formula in {me approved QAP., c:"
iL ~w-a~ ~ MW-~
Constituent 12/26/12 12/26/12 %RPD
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 17.2 17.9 3.99
Selenium 31.6 34.5 8.77
Uranium 5.8 6.4 9.84
Chloride (mg/L) 122 130 6.35
Per the approved QAP, an RPD greater than 20% is acceptable if the reported results are less than 5 times
the RL. These results are provided for information only.
~
G-SA: Radiologies Counting Error
GWCLs have not been established for MW-20, MW-22, MW-36, and MW-37.
N/A -the counting error is less than 20% of the activity as required by the GWDP. The value is above the GWCL
and this check column is not applicable.
G-SB: Radiologies Counting Error for Accelerated Samples
"''*'' '® v, ,ri '&l M/Ii'l Gr6ss AlpJla '1t~ 'f'#:~ ~ 'r*
i?;% minus Rnand Counting
III 'f'f I' GJ:os~!%Alpha %# U Precision'(IT/-Brrop tl~' Witliin
Well SampleDat~ minusRn &tI ) 20% ,~ GWCL GWCL?
MW-35 1012312012 4.31 0.409 Y 3.75 N/A
MW-65 1012312012 5.84 0.706 Y 3.75 N/A
MW-35 1211812012 6.5 0.864 Y 3.75 N/A
N/A -the counting error is less than 20% of the activity as required by the GWDP. The value is above the GWCL and this
check column is not applicable.
G-9A: Laboratory Matrix QC
Matrix Spike % Recovery Comparison
1i!1 >1SD '1W RPD I
1M Lab Report WeD 4:nalyte !Jf;, .·~~.~IJ~G · .~~~~ ll~G*,RttJ!ge RPD ifbR!lnge i? " .1M
1211109 MW-31 Naphthalene 53 70.2 41 -131 27.8 25
1211249 MW-11 Ammonia 82.6 86.5 90 -110 2.62 10
1211436 MW-14 Nitrate + Nitrite as N 109 115 90 -110 5.06 10
1212130 MW-23 Nitrate + Nitrite as N 105 111 90 -110 5.06 10
1212308 MW-19 Chloride 85 86 90 -110 1.12 10
1212308 MW-19 Sulfate 86 87.8 90 -110 1.13 10
315987 MW-02 Manganese* NA NA NA NA NA
315987 MW-02 Potassium* NA NA NA NA NA
G-9B: Accelerated Laboratory Matrix QC
Matrix Spike % Recovery Comparison
~." Ljl~epori ~~ ':: Welt ,. hJ~ .. i1i~naty.te' ';: i£;i"" RS ,(*,REif;;;': MSDJ~1UEC' ~C R2;l1tg~'h~ ~:D~% ~%wPB';Ra~g; ~.~ ~ !II
1210420 -October Accelerated MW-26 Nitrate+Nitrite (as N) 114 112 90 -110 1.27 10
1212473 -December Accelerated MW-31 Nitrate+Nitrite (as N) 111 118 90 -110 4.72 10
1212580 -December Accelerated MW-26 Nitrate+Nitrite (as N) 113 112 90 -110 0.889 10
TabH
Kriged Current Quarterly Groundwater Contour Map
® estimated dry area
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing
.5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW04-12 temporary perched monitoring well
5577 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-10 hed . .. A.5586 temporary perc nitrate monitoring
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing ~ 5594 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-27 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5525 installed October, 2011 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26 , TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are pumping wells
KRIGED 4th QUARTER, 2012 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H :/718000/feb 13/UwI1212. srf H-l
Tab I
Groundwater Time Concentration Plots
Time concentration plots for MW-01
Chloride in MW-Ol
60 ~----------------------------------------------------------~
50 +---------~~----------------------------------------------~
40 ~---------I----------------------------------------------_j
:::i' "ii.o .§. ~ 30 ~e-------~U-------------------------------------------------_j :5! o :E u
20 +e~------~~------------~-------------------.~--~~~
0
,\OJ ~'tJ'? ~~ ,4OJ~ ~OJ'tJ< ~OJ'tJ ~"). ~~ ~~OJ ,4V ,4 (f "..:s ~'li ~o "..:s ~'li ~o "..:s ~'li ~o 0
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-Ol
0.6 ~----------------------------------------------------------~
0.5 l-~~~------------------------------------------------------~
0.4
0.2 +I~----------------------~~~----~~--------------------~
0.1 +---------------------------------~----------------------_,
0
(f~OJ ~'tJ'? ~~
"..:s ~'li 0
,4OJ~
~o
~OJ'tJ<
"..:s
~OJ'tJ ~'li
,4~").
~o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
~~~
"..:s
~~OJ ~'li ,4V ~o
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
5000
4500
4000
3500
:J' 3000 Qo
E i 2500
~ ~ 2000
1500
1000
500
0
J
~O)
lY 0
Time concentration plots for MW-01
Sulfate in MW-Ol
• .-~ a\ .1!Ia.-.-_ --.... ~ ... ~ ...,,;,,-~---"'u --r I
~'b'" ~~ ,i:' ~O)t;. ~O)'b $:)"1-~t;;:)~ ~t;;:)0) ~v ,,~ ~'li ~o ,,~ ~'li ~o~ ,,~ ~'li ~o
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-91
12 ~-------------------------------------------------------------.
10 !-~------------------------------------------------------------1
8 ~1-------------------------------------------------------1
:J' }
E 6L-.. ------------------------------------------------------~ = 'c "' ~
4 +l~--~~--~--------~--~hI----------------------------~
0
lY~O) ~'b'"
0 ,,.;:j ~~ ~'li
~O)t;;:)
~o
~O)t;. ,,~ ~O)'b
~'li
~t;;:)"1-
~o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
~t;;:)~ ,,~ ~t;;:)0)
~'li ~v ~o
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-02
Chloride in MW-02
80T---------------------------------------------------------~
70 l---------~t-------------------------------------------------_1
60 ~--------_1----------------------------------------------_1
~ 50 l-----------~--------------------------------------------------__1 ao .§. ~ 40 l-----------~--------------------------------------------------_1 ~ .~
6 30 l-----------~--------------------------------------------------__1
20 ~~--~--~~------------------------------------------------_1
10
o L-~--~----~------~----_.----_.------~----_.----_.----~
(f~OJ o
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-02
0.9 ~----------------------------------------------------------~
0.8 ~~--------------------------------------------------------_1
0.7 ~~--------------------------------------------------------_1
0.6 ~~------------------------------------------------------_1
0.3
0.2 +.:-...!..---------------------------------~----_1
0.1 ~----------------------------------------------------------_1
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-02
Sulfate in MW-02
2500 ~--------------------------------------------------------------I
~ 1500 +J~~------I-------------~------------------------------------I 'Qo
.§.
~ ~ ~ 1000 +I~U-----------------------------------------------------------I
500 ~--I-----------------------------------------------------------I
0
,,0,
(f <5
20
18
16
14
~ 12 ~
E 10 ::l .r:
~ 8
6
4
2
0
I-
(f'\o,
<5
~'b'?
\V ~~ ~~
~
\
)\
If \ r ~ ,
~'b'?
\V ~~ ~~
~o,~ ~o,t;. ~o,'b ~'" ~~~ ~o~ \V ~o \V ~~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-02
i
-14 Id r,
~ I \
D \ J
\ /
\/
V
~o,~ ~o,t;. ~o,'b ~'" ~ ~o \V ~~ ~o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
~~~
\V
~~o,
~~ ~v ~o
~ r ~ ~j
\J ...
~~o,
~~ ~v ~o
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-03
Chloride in MW-03
160
140
120
~ 100
'Qo .s cu 80 :5!
0 ::2 u 60
40
20
0
tj"OJ
(5
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-03
1.4 ..,----------------------------------,
1.2 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
1 +-------------------------------------------e---------------~~
~ ....... K 0.8
cu :5! g 0.6 +-~~------------------------------------_++-------e_~~~~~
u:::
0.4
0.2 +-~~--------------------------------------------------------~
o +-----~------~----_.------._----~------~----~r_----~----~
tj"OJ
(5
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-03
Sulfate in MW-03
4500
4000
3500
3000
:::i' -~ 2500
~ .e 2000 "3 V)
1500
1000
500
0
(f~Oj
0
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-03
80 ~----------------------------------------------------------~
70 +------------------------------------------------------------j
60 +----------I-------------------------------------------------j
:::i' 50 +---------~~--------------------------------------------------~
}
E 40 +---------~-----------------i~----~~----~~~~r_~------~ ::l '2 ns ~ 30 +----------J~~~~\I~~~--fi~~~--------------~Itt1~----~
20
10
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values
• Non*Oetected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-03A
Chloride in MW-03A
80 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
70 +---------~--------------------------------------------------_4
~ SO +-----------------------------~~--~~~--------------------_4
'iio .§.
~ 40 +-------------------------------------------------------------~ :2 o ::c
u 30 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
~ ""
20 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
10 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
o +-----~------~----~------~------r_----_r------r_----_r----~
~" ....,'>~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-03A
1.8 ...----------------------------------------------------------------,
1.6 ~-------------------------------------------------------------4
1.4 +I-----.... -------------:---------I--------.r---------------------------I
1.2 ~~--~~----~~----~--~--------~------~~~----~--------I
~ 1 +-------~~~----------~-----------a~--~----------------~ __
~ 'tl .~ 0.8 +---------1--1----------------------------------------------------1
:::I u:::
0.6 +-------~~----------------------------------------------------I
0.4 +-------~I-I-----------------------------------------I
0.2 +-------~-----------------------------------------------~
o +-----~--~--~----~------~----~------~----~r_----~----~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater 'Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
4500
4000
3500
3000
::J' ...... ,g 2500
~ ~ 2000 "'3 II'l
1500
1000
500
0
1:)<'
t:f ..... .;s
40
35
30
_ 25 ..... ...... a.o
,
\
1 .=
E 20 ::J '2
III ~ 15
10
5
o
Time concentration plots for MW-03A
~fo 'r-~" r$-«.~
"-/'-r
Sulfate in MW-03A
r$-~ <:;)'l'
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-03A
........ ,
.-/ ...
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater 'Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
/' --~
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
~ "" 11.0 .§.
CII ~ 0 ::2 u
~ "" 11.0 .§.
CII " "§
::s u:::
Time concentration plots for MW-05
Chloride in MW-OS
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
o +-----~------~----~------~----~------~----~------~----_4
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
~ ~'8 ~'li ~t:Q'" <:)'l}
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-OS
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report I
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values '
• Non-Detected Values
9000
8000
7000
6000
~ ~ 5000
CI.I ~ 4000 -= VI
3000
2000
1000
0
4~_ ..A.. -!'IV ,
~ 9;,'" ;:xqj ~ ~~ ()t;:;
35
30
25
~ ~ 20
E ::J 'c 15 !II ~
10
5
0
~Ib~ ~ ")~~ ~o
Time concentration plots for MW-05
1M
~ ~Ib ~.;j
~ ~ ()t;:;
Sulfate in MW-OS
--A --. ---
~O)..." ~O)t;. 9JIb ~" ~ ~ ~~ ~o 'i':> ")~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-OS
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater :Monit oring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
----
S;)" c.,e~
--
s;)0) ~v ~ ~ ~o
., Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
80
70
60
:::i' 50
'Qo .s
cu 40 :5! 0 ::E u 30
20
10
0
~q,"V
()(l;
0.8
0.7
0.6
:::i' 0.5
'Qo .s cu 0.4 :5! o :J ~ 0.3
0.2
0.1
o
~q,'o
't-q
Time concentration plots for MW-11
Chloride in MW-ll
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-ll
.......
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
~ -
IJ
I~Jt n fly ~~
• Detected Values ;
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-11
Sulfate in MW-ll
2500 ~--------------------------------------------------------------,
2000 +-~------------------------------------------------------------~
~ 1500 +-~----------------~~----------------------------------------~ "Qa .s
~ ~ ~ 1000 iili~Ii~~iP"~~"~~~~~;;~~~---------t~~~~2-----1
500 +-----~--------------------------------------------------------~
o +-----~------~------r-----~------~----~------~------r_----~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-ll
4.5 ~---------------------------------------------------------------,
4 +---------------------~----------------------------------------~
3.5 +---------------------~----------------------------------------~
3 +---------------------.. ----------------~----------------------~
~ "Qa ..= 2.5 +----------------;H-----------;~-----------------~
E :J 'c 2 +-------------a----~L9~------_.~--------------------~ ~ ::>
1.5 +-----------~H-----_.~_w~~a_-------.~~~-----------------~
0.5 .==------+-f...,.-w----t-J-t-t---l ....... IHH~"I:__jr_t-t------
o +-----~------_r------~----~--~ .. _r------~----~------~---~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
160
140
120
::i' 100 -bO .§.
QI 80 :2 0 ::c u 60
40
20
0
~q,'" ~'li
0.4
0.35
0.3
::i' 0.25
'bD .§.
QI 0.2 ~ 'i: o ~
u::: 0.15
0.1
0.05
0
r.l:> ~tQ ~'li
fo ~q; ~~
fo ~q; ~~
Time concentration plots for MW-12
~q,OJ
~o
~r.CJ ~o
Chloride in MW-12
~OJ'" 9)'0
5:f ~'li ,,~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-12
~
~
~OJ'" 9)'0 P} 1):)'" 5:f (:fOj 5:f ~'li ,,~ 0 ,,'li
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater 'Monitoring Report ;
4th Quarter 2012
---"
5:l'o ~'b",
_..A
J\... -V\A
I):)OJ ~v ~ ~~ ~o
• Detected Values ;
• Non-Detected Values
~
Inti=tA
.... '"
Time concentration plots for MW-12
Sulfate in MW-12
9000 ~--------------------------------------------------------------,
8000 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
7000 ~--~~--------------------------------------------------------~
6000 ~--~U---------------------------------------------------------~
~ 5000
cu ~ 4000 +---~~--------------------------------------------------------~ "3 \I)
3000 +---~~--------------------------------------------------------~
1000 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
o +-----~------~------~----_r------~----~------~------~----~
~<o'" ~'li
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-12
25 ~--------------------------------------------------------------__,
20 +-------------------~~--__ ----------~~~._------~----~~~~
5 +---~------------------------------~~----------~~----------__4
0
~<o'" ~ ~<oOJ ~qj ~'li ';f:~ ~o ~OJ'" 9)'0 P) f.::J'" ~ tfOj ..... 'li~ ~'li ..... ~ 0
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report . ~
4th Quarter 2012
~'o f.::JOJ ~v ~'li~ ~ 't-~ ~o
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::i "Qo
Time concentration plots for MW-14
Chloride in MW-14
40 ~-------------------------------------------------------------.
35 l-------------------------------------------------------------~
30 1-------------------------~----------------------------------~
10 1-------------------------~----------------------------------_1
5 ~------------------------------------------------------__1
O ~----_r----_.------._----_.----_.------._----_.----_.----~
~'bOJ
~o
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-14
0.3 .......--------------------------------------------,
0.25 1--------------------------------1---------------------------_1
0.2 +-----:: ... -.... >---.Iiiii::""---------f-t-"fir--------------i
.§.
QI 0.15 -I-------~~I------------------~~----~IIJ___t ...... _""I ... ~ :5! o ;:,
i!:
0.1 ~-----------I~-------------------------------------_I
0.05 -1-------------------------------------------------_1
0 ~----~----~----~----~------r_----~----~----_r----_4
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-14
Sulfate in MW-14
2500 ~--------------------------------------------------------------~
:! 1500 'bD .§.
.2! ~ ~ 1000 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
:! -Q.D ..:;
E ~ 'c "' ~
500 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
o +-----~------,,------._----_.------._----~------._------r_----~
~q,C>j
~o
120
100
80
60
40
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-14
20 ~----------~~--------------------------------~~------------~
0
~ ~ ~C>j"> (fct; ~C>j
0 ~~ <:;)'l;
~~ ~ (\. ~<-,
<t.~ 9(,~ ~ '\..:> ~..:> ~~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report I
4th Quarter 2012
~ ~ ~v (f~ ~~ 0 ~~ ~o
• Detected Values :
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-15
Chloride in MW-lS
60 ~-------------------------------------------------------------.
50 A---~~----------~----------~~~--.. ----------------------~
::;-tiD .§. ~ 30 ~-----------------------I----------Ir-------------------------! "C ".: o :c u
20 ~-------------------------------------------------------------!
10 ~-------------------------------------------------------------!
o L-----~----~----~------~----,_----_r----_.------._--~
~'bOj
~o
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-lS
0.4 ----------------------------------------------------------------,
0.35 ~-----------------------------------------------------1
0.3 +-----~ .. ~--~~------------_i~r_--------------------_j
::;-0.25 +----------\--I~------~~~~~~-~---==:::-----~'t_---II
tiD .§. ~ 0.2 L-----------~~~-----------------------------------------~-1 :2 o ~ 0.15 L------------~~------------------------------------------1
0.1 +-------------~~--------------------------------------1
0.05 ~--------------------------------------------------1
o ~----~----~------~----~----~----~r_----~----_r----~
P) ~Oj ~'lj
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater'Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
.. Detected Values .
1 ,
• Non-Detected Values
::i' 'Qa E
Time concentration plots for MW-15
Sulfate in MW-1S
3000 ~------------------------------------------------------------I
2500 ~~--------~~------------------------------~--~~~~~~1
2000
i 1500
~ "3 \I)
1000 ~------------------------------------------------------------1
500 ~------------------------------------------------------------1
0
~q,~ 9>'" 9)<' ~~/\" ~ ~'" ~r;:,<' ~ ~-$> ~v ~~ ~ o(J ~ \'l>~ \.:> 't-':> ~". 't-~ ~o ~o \.:>
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-1S
70 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
60 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
::i'
} 40
E ~ .~ 30 ~~~~~~~~~------=--------------------------ir-----------~ ~
20 L-----------~------------------------------------------------~
10 ~----------_I------------------------------------------------~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012 •
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
:::i' -til)
.§.
QI ~ 0 ::c u
Time concentration plots for MW-17
Chloride in MW-17
60
SO
40
30
20
10
o +-----_.-------r------~----_.------_r------~----_.------_r----~
,(0) ....
~o
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-17
0.45 -r------------------------------------,
0.4 +--------------------------''11IIIIIIII::::------------------1
0.35 +-----::i~------------------tl----tr__--------------I
0.3 +-..,.'----~ .... -h;;;::::::_--------___:::__7I''----+_--___:::__---------------I
:::i' Cia .§. 0.25 +------------------..::~-------------....:~~::::::=~---=:!.-I
QI "0 .~ 0.2 +-------------------------------------tt\ = u:::
0.15 +----------------------------------------1
0.1 +------------------------------------~
0.05 +--------------------------------------------------------------1
o +-----~------~------r_----~----~----_.-----_r----r_----I
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report , I
4th Quarter 2012
Detected Values '
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-17
Sulfate in MW-17
3500 ~--------------------------------------------------------------,
3000 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
::i" ~ 2000 ~~~~,----~--------------~--------------------------------_1rl .s
~ J!! 3 1500 +-~~--~~~--------------------------------------------------4
\I)
1000 +---------~4~--------------------------------------------------~
500 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
o +------.------.-------r------r------~----~------,_----_,._----~
~O)",
~'li
50
45
40
35
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-17
< 30 ~
E 25
::l ·c ~ 20 ::)
15
10
5
0
~O)",
~'li 9}" ~
~ p;,0) .... ~ ,..~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Beport . I
4th Quarter 2012
Detected Values ·
• Non-Detected V~lues
Time concentration plots for MW-18
Chloride in MW-18
80 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
70 +-~r---------------------------------------------------------~
60 +-~r---------------------------------------------~~--------~
~ 50 +-~~------------------------------------~~~~--~--~~~~
liD .§.
~ 40 +-~'----------------'~------~~-----------------------------1 ~ o :c
u 30 +---~--------~~--------------------------------------------~
20 +---~~------------------------------------------------------~
10 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
o +-----~------~----_,------,_----~r_----~------r_----_r----~
~Oj",
~'li
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-18
0.45 ~------------------------------------------------------------__,
0.4 ..,,...------------------------------------------------------1
0.35 +-----~-----------___::2fI'I"'--_l_-----------------------------I
0.3 +--------~ ......... ~----------~l__--~Ir_------------------------I
~ liD .§. 0.25 +-----------------------------....-: .. ----'~-----------------------I
~ "CI .~ 0.2 +-------------------------------------------t--F'I~~~~---"'Ik_-I = i:L:
0.15 +----------------------------------------------1--1--------------1
0.1 +------------------------------------------s-.__-------------f
0.05 +----------------------------------------11-----------1
o +-----~------~----~------~----~---~--~~---~----f
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-18
Sulfate in MW-18
2500 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
2000 +-----------------------------------------------------~--~~
~ 1500 ~~~----------------~~~*_--------------------------------~ 'Qo .s
~ ~ ~ 1000 +---~~------------------------------------------------------~
..... }
500 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
o +-----~------~----~------r_----_r------._----_.------._----~
~OJ",
~?
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-18
60 ~------------------------------------------------------------_.
50 +------------------------------------------------------=------~
40 +---------------------------------------~~._~~~~------~~
E 30 +---------------------~--------------------------------------~ ::s ·c ~ ;:)
20 +-------------~~--------------------------------------------__4
10 +-~~~~~--------------------------------------------------~
o +-----~------,_----~------~------r_----_r------._----_r----__;
~OJ",
~'li
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater'Monitoring Report . I
4th Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-19
Chloride in MW-19
100
90
80
70
::::; 60 "aD .§.
QI 50 :2 (; :c 40 u
30
20
10
0
~Oj'? ~<, ~ ~ 9f,Oj ~1i '\~ ~~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-19
1.6 ~-------------------------------,
1.4 .!-------------------.---------------1
1.2 .!------------------~-~~-------------1
::::; 1 .!-------~~~----~I-~------_t .... ~~~~~~
"aD .§.
QI 0.8 ~~--------------------------------_it_------------_j :2 (;
~ 0.6 +-----------------------------------tfl---------------j
0.4 .!-----------------------------------;t-------------,
0.2 .!--------------------------------------------~t-------------,
O ~----~----_r----~------r_----~----~----_.----_,----~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater, Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values .
I
• Non-Detected V~lues
.... 'aD E
Time concentration plots for MW-19
Sulfate in MW-19
3000 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
2500 +-~~--------------------------------------------------------,
2000 L-~~----------~~~~\-----------------------------------~
i 1500 6---~------~~-----------4~~~----------------------------~
J!! "3 \I)
~ ....... ~
E :J 'c I!! :::)
1000 +---~~~------------------~+-------~~--~------------~~~
500 +---------------------------~~----------~~~~_4~~~~--~
o +-----~------~----~------~----~------._----_r------._----~
~O)",
~'1i
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-19
30 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
25 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
20
15
10
5
o +-----~------~----~r_----~------r_----_r------._----~----~
~O)",
~'1i
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater:Monitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values .
• Non~Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-20
Chloride in MW-20
80~--------------------------------------------------------~
70 ~-----------------------------------------------1~-------j
60 ~----------------------------=-~~~--------~~F-~~~~~
~ 50 +-----------~~~~--------------------------------------------~
"aD .s ~ 40 ~--------------------------------------------------------------~ :2 o ~
u 30 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
20 +-----------------------------------------------------------~
10 +---------------------------------------------------------~
O +-----~----~----~----~----~----~~----~----~--~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-20
0.4
0.35
0.3
~ 0.25
'" QI) .s
~ 0.2 :2 0 :::J u:: 0.15
0.1
0.05
0
cfb ~ \..:>
cfb cO) c ~ <:)'lJ \..:>
cO) C <:)'lJ
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values -
• Non-Detected Values
4500
4000
3500
3000
=r ..... ~ 2500
2! ~ 2000 :;
\I)
1500
1000
500
0
9J~ (J
<;;)'1'
40
35
30
_ 25
...I ..... ~
E 20
:::J 'c ~ ::l 15
10
5
0
9J~ (J <;;)'1;
~
l'nti=tA
(JOJ'o
<;;)'1;
(JOJ'o
<;;)'1;
Time concentration plots for MW-20
(JOJtV
<;;)'1;
Sulfate in MW-20
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-20
s§l rz,c ~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater!Monitoring Report I
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values '
~
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-22
Chloride in MW-22
80 T---------------------------------------------------------------~
70 +-----------------------------------------------------------------4
60 +-________________________________ ~=_ __ mc~------~~~~~----~
~ so +-----~ .. --~~--------------------------------------------------; -aa .s
~ 40 +-----------------------------------------------------------------4 "'C "§
:2
u 30 +-----------------------------------------------------------------4
20 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
10 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
o +-----_,------_r------~----_,------_r------~----_,------_r----~
(f0)~
<:Jl;
16
14
12
~ 10 -aa .s ~ 8 ~ (; ::s u:::: 6
4
2
o
.-
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-22
)
/
/
/
/---I
...... ..... .-. ./ --~ ----
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater 'Monitoring Report , , ,
4th Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-22
Sulfate in MW-22
7000 ~--------------------------------------------------------------I
6000 +------------------------------------------------.~--------~~1
5000 +---------------------------------------~=-~~~----~\lr1~--1
~ 1-----------------~--~~~--------------------------~--------1 Qo 4000 +
.§.
cu +' ~ 3000 ~=-------------------------------------------------------------~
III
2000 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
1000 +---------------------------------------------------------------1
O +-----~----_r----~----_,------~----~----~----~----~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-22
60 ~--------------------------------------------------------~
50 L-------------------------------------~ __ ~~--~~#1~~----__1
40 L---------~~--~=---------------------------------------1l--__1
~ }
E 30 L---------------------------------------------------------~~__1 ~ '2 III ~
20 +--------------------------------------------------------------j
10 +------------------------------------------------------------1
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater :Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected V~lues
35
30
25
:J
'Qa 20 .§.
QI ~ .~ 15 ~ u
10
5
0
~"). ~'" "e~ (J Q'l;
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
:J ....... til) .§. 0.5
QI
~ (; 0.4
:::J u::
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
~ ~f:::,(o ~ .... .;s "?'-~
Time concentration plots for MW-23
~~ ~'lj
~ ~~
Chloride in MW-23
~" ~(o &-~f:::,OJ 'i~<:' "e~ (J Q'l; ~'lj
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-23
&-(J Q'l;
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report I
4th Quarter 2012
~ ~ .... .;s
~"). ~ "e~ (J Q'l;
• Detected Values '
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-23
Sulfate in MW-23
3000 ~--------------------------------------------------------------I
2500 +-----------------~----------------~--------------------------I
2000 ~~--t\J_~-----------------------------------=~~~~~--~
~ Qo
E ~ 1500 +--J~L-------------------------------------------------------~~ +' J!! 3 I/)
1000 +---~----------------------------------------------------------~
500 +---------------------------------------------------------------1
~ .......
90
80
70
60
~ 50
E ~ 'c 40 ~ ::)
30
20
10
o
o +-----~----~----~~----._----~----~----~._----._----~
4
.. V~ .-.. ..
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-23
......... ..... ~ -.. --.......
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater .Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
...
/'" ..... --
• Detected Values .
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-24
Chloride in MW-24
80 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
70 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
60 ~~------~--------------------------------------------------~
~ so +-~----~~--------------------------------------------------~
'Qa ..s
~ 40 +-----~~----------------~~----~~--------------~ __ ~~--~ :2 o ::E
u 30 +-------~----------------------------------------------------~
~ 'Qa ..s
20 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
10 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
o +-----~------~----~------~----~~----~------r_----~----~
):)"
\,><:'
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-24
0.6 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
0.5 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
0.4 +----------------------------------------1t-1
~ 0.3 ~--------~l----------------------------------------~~----~~ ~ .~
:s ~
0.2 +-~~~~---~~~--_.~-------------------~~--~~~~
0.1 +-------------------=-----------~~._ __ ----------------------~
o +-----~------~---~------,_----~------~----~------~----~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater ;Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
Detected Values ,
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-24
Sulfate in MW-24
3500 ~--------------------------------------------------------------I
3000 +-----------------------------------~~------------------------I
:i' ~ 2000 +-------------------------------------------------------~------I .§.
~ ~ '---------------------------------------------------------------1 3 1500 +
\I)
1000 +---------------------------------------------------------------1
500 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
250
200
:i' 150 ~
E
::J ·c
~ 100
50
o
o ~----~----~----~~----~----~----~----~~----~----~
L-A.. -..-.
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-24
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report . I
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values i
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-2S
Chloride in MW-2S
40
35
30
::::i' 25 -11.0 .§.
Q/ 20 :E 0 ::c u 15
10
5
0
~" 5;)'0 ~ ~ ~q, ~ «.~ c ...: ,~ 't(-~<';' (;)tz; Ov
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-2S
0.5 ~------------------------------------------------------------I
0.45 .!-----------------------------------t
0.4 .!--------~~-------------------------t
0.35 -I-..,,------::i~--"r--_=_-~~ ... ~----___;;;_-----...._-----t
~ 0.3 ~---------~'_----------=-----=:.......:i~~~------'l-.... 11.0 .§.
Q/ 0.25 .!-----------------------------------t ~ .§
~ 0.2 ~--------------------------------------i
0.15 -l---------------------------------1
0.1 -l-----------------------------------------------------~
0.05 ~--------------------------------i
0 -l-----~----_.------r_----,_----_r----_.------._----,,----_1
5;)" ,'>~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater 'Monitoring Report ~ :
4th Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-2S
Sulfate in MW-2S
1900 ~--------------------------------------------------------------I
1850 +---~----~~-----e--------------------------------------------~
1800 +-~~~--~~\---~~-------4'---------------------------------~
1600 ~--------~--------------=---------\f--------------------------~
1550 +-----_,------~------~----_r------~----_,------~----~r_----~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-2S
8~--------------------------------------------------------1
7 t-------------------------------------------~~~----~~--~
_5 t--------------------------------------------ir-------------~ ...I ~
E 4 t-----------------------------------------------------------~ :::J '2 ~ ~ 3 +------------------------------------------------------------------1
2 t-----------------------------------------------------------~
O ~----~----~----~~----~----~----~------r_----~----~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater :Monitoring Report , I
4th Quarter 2012
., Detected Values ,
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-26
Chloride in MW-26
90
80
70
60
::i' -,g 50
QI 'tJ '§ 40
::2 u
30
20
10
0
s;)'" ~r::>'? (f~ ,?e~ ~o ~~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-26
1 ~--------------------------------------------------------~
0.9 +--------------J'----------------------------------------------j
0.8 +-----------~--~---------------------------------------------j
0.7 +--------J~----~--------------------------------------------~
~ 0.6 +---~-----I~----------------------I 11.0 E
-; 0.5 -I-~L-------I_---------------------.... ___, 'tJ '§ ~ 0.4 j[----------~-----------------------~~__1
0.2 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
0.1 !--------------------------------------------------------------1
o L-----~----~------._----~----_.------._----._----_r----~
s;)'" ,?e~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report r
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values '
I
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-26
Sulfate in MW-26
2500 ~-------------------------------------------------------I
2000 .J---------------------~~~~-,_L-\_-----~~~--Af~~~~
::i' 1500 .J---------------------------------1 'b:o .§.
.2l J!! ~ 1000 .J-------------------------------------------~
::i' 'b:o .=
E ~ 'c ~ ::)
500 .J-------------------------------------------------------------1
0
~'" l):)'? ~~ s::>(c) ~~ g, sf> ~ :-,"" ~v c.,e~ o(f ~ '$$ ~f;j ".;)~ ~o.; c.,eq ~o <:;)'1; ~'I; ~'li ~'li 't-..:5
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-26
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
O !-----~----_r----~----~r_----~----~----_r----~----~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater 'Monitoring Report , I
4th Quarter 2012
Detected Values '
j
• Non-Detected V~lues
Time concentration plots for MW-27
Chloride in MW-27
50 ~-------------------------------------------------------------.
45 +-----------------------------------~--------~~----~~~--~
40 +-______________________ ~~.e~~~~~_#~------------------~
35 +=~--~~_#---=~ .. ~----------------------------------------~
~ 30 +-------------------------------------------------------------~ "b:.o .§.
~ 25 +-------------------------------------------------------------~ :g
o 6 20 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
15 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
10 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
5 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
o +-----~------~----~------,_----~~----~------r_----_r----~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-27
0.9 ~------------------------------------------------------------_,
0.8 +-----------~~-=~--~~------------------------------------~
0.7 ~~~----~--------~----~~~~----~~----~------__ ------~
0.6 ~----------------------------------------------~L---------~~
~
"b:.o .§. 0.5
~ "tJ .~ 0.4 +-------------------------------------------------------------~
::I u:::
0.3 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
0.2 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
0.1 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
o +-----~------~----_.------._----_.------,_----~------~----~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater ,Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values ;
• Non*Defected V~lues
Time concentration plots for MW-27
Sulfate in MW-27
600 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
500 L--------------------------------------------------------------1
400 .. ~~----~--~----~~--------~~---------------------------1
:::;-
"b:o E ~ 300 ~-------------------------------------------------------------j +' ~ 3 11'1
200 L--------------------------------------------------------------1
100 L--------------------------------------------------------------1
0 L-----~----_r----~----~~----~----~----_.----~----~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-27
34 ~-------------------------------------------------------------.
33 ~tL-----------------------------------------------------------!
32 LJ~-------J~------~--------------_lr_----------------~------1
29 L-----------------------------------~--~b_----ir--~~----_j~
28 ~------------------------------------------~~----------~~-!
27 ~----~------._----_.------~------r_----_.------._----_r------;
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Rl=port j
4th Quarter 2012
• •
DetectectValues \ ..
) .! Non-Detected Vall;le5
Time concentration plots for MW-28
Chloride in MW-28
160
140
120
~ 100
liD .§.
III 80 :g
0 ::c u 60
40
20
0
s;)~ 5:)'0 ~ ~ s;)'b ~ ~'Q" «,qJi {J (f \.;:i <:;)'l' 0
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-28
0.8 ~-------------------------------------------------------------.
0.7 !--------------------------------------------------------------1
~o.s t----------------------------------------------------------------1
liD .§.
III 0.4 t--------------------------------------------1 "'0 .~
:::J ~ 0.3 +------------------------------------------------------1
0.2 t--------------------------------------------------------------1
0.1 t--------------------------------------------------------------1
O ~----~----_.------r_----~----_.------._----,_----_.----~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring ~eport
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values
I
• Non*Detected vaiues
Time concentration plots for MW-28
Sulfate in MW-28
3000 ~--------------------------------------------------------------I
2500 L---------~~----~--------------------------------------------~
2000 4l------------------------------------------------------------~~
::::i' 'Qo
E i 1500 L---------------------------------------------------------------I
J!! "S \I)
.....
1000 L---------------------------------------------------------------~
500 ~--------------------------------------------------------------~
O +-----~----~----~r_----~----~----~----~r_----~----~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-28
6 ~--------------------------------------------------------1
5 ~----~~------------------------------------~------_1
4 +-----JL~----~~,_----------------------------------------~
~
E 3 +-----------~l_----~~~--------------------------------~ ~ ·2
~ ::::)
2 +-----------------------------------------------------------~
O ~----~----~----~----_.----_.----~----~----~----~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring R+port
4th Quarter 2012
Detected Values
.' Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-29
Chloride in MW-29
45 ~---------------------------------------------------------.
40 ~---'~--~--~------~-------------------,~------~~~~
35 ~~~------------------~~----~~--~~-----------------1
30 ~----------------------------~~~--------------------------~
..... '-!25 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
QI
~
"g 20 ~------------------------------------------------------------~ ::E u
::i' t;:o
E
15 +---------------------------------------------------------~
10 +------------------------------------------------------------1
5 +---------------------------------------------~------1
O +-----~----~----~----~----~----~----~----_r----~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-29
1.2 ~----------------------------------------------------------~
1 ~----------------------------------------------------~
-; 0.6 +------------------------------------~ ~ "g
;:,
iZ
0.4 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
0.2 +-----------------------------------------------------------~
O +-----~----~----~----~----~----~----~----~--~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater lYIonitoring R~port
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-29
Sulfate in MW-29
3500 ~--------------------------------------------------------------~
3000 +---------~~------------------------__ ------------------------~
2500 +------------------------------------------------------------.--~
:J' ~ 2000 +-------------------------------------------------------------~~ .§.
GI +' ~ 3 1500 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
V)
:J' -tl.O .=
E :l '2
III ~
1000 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
500 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
o +-----~------~------r_----_r------~----~------,_----~r_----~
~ ........a.. ~ 4" .,.
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-29
,-
.-_ ...... ----
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring RrPort
4th Quarter 2012
-------........
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Valoes
Time concentration plots for MW-30
Chloride in MW-30
180
160
140
120
:! -! 100
III :g 80 0 ::c u
60
40
20
0
!.)<' sJo S-S-§ ~~c.; «,V1 ~ \.:;) <;;)11;
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-30
0.6 ~-------------------------------------------------------------.
0.5 L---------~----------------------------------------------~
0.4 U<---------I---.::..::~t-------------_;Jt-----------___:::_-I
:! "'iiD E ~ 0.3 1-------------------~~----------------------------------------__1 ~ o ~ u:::
0.2 L-----------------------------------------------------------~
0.1 l---------____________________________________________________ -j
0
!.)<' !.)<Q S-§ ~ «,V1 \.:;) ~~
S-!.)'b P> ~ @Q(S 1:X">; ~ tf <;;)11; 0 ~.:;) ~~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report , I
4th Quarter 2012
~ .......... y ~v § ~~ \~ ~o
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Val~es
Time concentration plots for MW-30
Sulfate in MW-30
1200
1000
800
~ 'bD ..s 600 ~ .e :;
\I)
400
200
o +-----~------~------r-----_r------~----~------~----~r_----~
Sample Date
. Uranium in MW-30
12 ~----------------------------------------------------------------.
10 +-------------------------~._------------------------_.._------~
8 +---~--_ar_--------------~_+----------------------~._~~k.~~
~
}
E 6 ~----------------------------~-----------------.~--------------. ~ 'c "' ~
4 +-------------------------------------------------------~------~
2 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
o +-----~r_----~------~----r_r_----~------~------r_----~----~
Sample Date
White Mesa ,Uranium MiU
Groundwater M'onitoring Report , ,
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected ValuJs
Time concentration plots for MW-31
Chloride in MW-31
200
180
160
140
l
-1\" ~~ I
-~ ~ lflii
~ 120 ~ ~ -~ ~.
1 .",..."." 11.0 .§.
CII 100 :E 0 :c 80 u
60
40
\
\
.1 /
20
0
I
I ~ 1 ...
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-31
1.4 .....--------------------------------,
1.2 -l---------~.-----------------------------------------------___1
~
'Qo 0.8 'L-~--=-------=-----":\--I-----~--=~~""=--~iiiiiiI=:J .§.
CII ~ 'g 0.6 -l---------------\-I!..----------------___1
~
0.4 -'---------------I4f-----------------j
0.2 -'------------------------------------~
0 .!-----~----~----~------._----._----~----~----~----_1
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-31
Sulfate in MW-31
700 ~---------------------------------------------------------------,
600 L---------------------------------------------------------------Ifi
~ I-----------------------------------~----------------------~--_i 'Qo 400 -I-
.5-
2! ~ 300 !---------------------------------------------------------------~ "S 11'1
200 +----------------------------------------------------------------j
100 L----------------------------------------------------------------j
O .!..-----~----~------r_----~----~----~~----~----~----~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-31
10 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
9 .!..-----~~--------------------------------------_,r_----__j
8 L-----4L--~--------------------------------------t_~~~~
~ 6 !-----------------------------------------------~\f------------__1 'Qo .=
E 5 .!..---------------------------------------------------------__1 ~ 'c g 4 .!..-----------------------------------------------------------------1
3 .!..-----------------------------------------------~--------__1
O .!..-----~----~----_.._----._~--._----_.----_.------._--~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater M~nitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-32
Chloride in MW-32
60 ~--------------------------------------------------------------~
50 ~-------------------------------------------------------------1
40 ~----------------------------------------ift------------------1
20 ~-------------------------------------------------------------1
10 ~-------------------------------------------------------------1
0
c'" ';)", ~ C(O t$I ,;)'0 co, <:) ~.., ~v "e~ 0(;= eC .... 7>~ ~ ~~ § ~~ "eQ. ~o ~ ~~ .... v "t-v
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-32
0.4
0.35
0.3
_ 0.25 ...... -b.D .§.
CII 0.2 ~ "§
~ u::: 0.15
0.1
0.05
0
c'" "e~ c'" tf 0
~ eC ~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Va.lues
:::i'
'b.o E
Time concentration plots for MW-32
Sulfate in MW-32
3000 T---------------------------------------------------------------,
2500 +-------------------------~--~----~~~~--------------------~
2000 ~------------------------------------------~----------------~~
~ 1500 +-----------------------------------~----------------------~--~ ~ 3 II)
1000 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
500 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
o +------,-------r------r-----~------._----~------~------r_----~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-32
7 ~------------------------------------------------------------I
6 +------------------------------------------------------------------i
5 +---------------~~~---------------------------------------------i
:::i'
'b.o4 +-------~~----~--~r_--------------------------~--------------~ ..:!:
E ::J .~ 3 +-------~~._--~------~~~-------------------------------------; ~
o +-------r_----~------~------~----~------_r------._----~r_-----4
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected ValueS
Time concentration plots for MW-35
Chloride in MW-35
80
\ .-. ~
70
60
:J' 50
'Qo
.§.
<II 40 :2 o ::c u 30
20
10
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
:J' 'Qo .§. 0.25
<II 't:J .~ 0.2
::s ~
0.15
0.1
0.05
\ /' ---
V
.
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-35
l
" /'---........
~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
.-..
Detected Values
• Non-Detected ValueS
-:J' 'Qa E
Time concentration plots for MW-35
Sulfate in MW-35
3000 ~--------------------------------------------------------------~
2500 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
2000 ~~----------~----------------------------------------~~----~
i 1500 +---~----#-----------------------------------------------------~
.l!! "5 VI
-:J' ....... ~
E :s ·2
~ :l
1000 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
500 +---------------------------------------------------------------~
o +-----~------,_------r_----_r------~----~------~----~------~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-35
30
25
20
15
10
5
o +-----~------_r------~----~------_r------~----~------_r----~
r.:",r:::.
<::)'lI
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater MO,nitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values '
80
70
60
4,.......
:::i' 50
'Qo
.§.
cu 40 :5! o :i: u 30
20
10
o
0.335
0.33
0.325
:::i' 0.32 ....... QQ
.§.
cu 0.315 1:J ";: 0 :::s u::: 0.31
0.305
0.3
0.295
'\. ~'\. 'tf-v
~
~'\. c.,"'~
Time concentration plots for MW-36
Chloride in MW-36
~
~ ""
~'\.'\.
~o
,.---
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-36
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
-
• Detected Values
• Non~Detected Values
~
l:nti=lA
Time concentration plots for MW-36
Sulfate in MW-36
o +-----~------,_------r-----_r------~----~------~----~------~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-36
30 ~----------------------------------------------------------------,
~ 25 +--------------------------~-~~~--~~~----~
20 +-----------------------------------------------------------------1
~ ~
E 15 +-----------------------------------------------------------------1 ::l ·c ~
:::)
10 +-----------------------------------------------------------------1
5 +-----------------------------------------------------------------1
o +-----~------~------~----~------_r------~----_,------~----~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-37
Chloride in MW-37
60 ~----------------------------------------------------------~
40 +-----------------~~~----~~----------------------------_j
~ ~ .§. ~ 30 +---------------------------------------------------------------~ :5! o :::c u
~ -Il.O .§.
~ :g
0 ::s u:::
20 +-----------------------------------------------------------~
10 +---------------------------------------------------------~
0
~"I-~"I-"I-"I-~"I-& ~v 0 ~o
0.35 -
0.3
0.25 '" ""-.....
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
"I-~"I-"I-~"I-"I-~"I-~v OV ~o
~'" ~v ~ y ;:x"I-~ ~ ,,'I; ~'I; ~'I; "V
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-37
..-
Y ~v ~ y ;:x"I-~ ,,~~ ~'I; ~'I; "V
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
~ ~ y ~"I-&"1-~ ()'l; ~v 0
-
~ ~v ~"I-'" ~"I-~v Ov ()~
Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-37
Sulfate in MW-37
3000 ~--------------------------------------------------------------I
2000 L-----------------------------------------------------~--------,
:;-
"DD E ~ 1500 L---------------------------------------------------------~~--, +' J!! 3 I/)
1000 L---------------------------------------------------------------~
500 L---------------------------------------------------------------,
0
...:",,,, ~",,,, y ~V '" Y '" '" y ~'" ~ ~'" ~ ~'" tj'" (J ~ 0<; ~o ,,'t> ~'t> ~'t> ,,~ 't-~ 0 <::)'l' 't-~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-37
20
18
16
14
~
~ ~
< 12 ~ ~ ~ ~
E 10 ::J '2 III ~ 8
6
4
2
0
'" ...:",,,, ~",,,, ~'" 't-~ oCj ~o
-.---
y ~V '" Y ~ ~'" ~ ,,'t> ~'t> ~'t> ,,~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
4th Quarter 2012
'" ...:V (JV ~'" 0<; <::)'l' 't-~
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
TabJ
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:39 AM
'[e-mail]'
'Phillip Goble'; Thomas Rushing'; Harold Roberts; David Frydenlund; Jo Ann Tischler; David
Turk; N. Tanner Holliday; Garrin Palmer; Jaime Massey
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2012 04 Groundwater Monitoring
04_2012_EDD.csv
Attached to this e-mail is an electronic copy of laboratory results for groundwater monitoring conducted at the White
Mesa Mill during the fourth quarter of 2012, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
1