DRC-2017-005324 - 0901a06880730add

State of Utah
GARY R HERBERT
Governor
SPENCERJ COX
Lieutenant Governor
Department of
Environmental Quality
Alan Matheson
Executive Director
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMEN !'
AND RADIA TION CONTROL
Scott T Anderson
Director
im~2on-ooEd24'
MEMORANDUM
TO:Project File C-2017-17
THROUGH:Heather Mickelson, PE V\
Phil Goble, Uranium Mill Section Manager £
7/Cr7?«/7
FROM:Russell J. Topham, PE Kp
DATE:rJuly 18,2017
SUBJECT:2017 Engineering Module 73, Inspection of disposal of 1
from in situ leach facilities
le.(2) decommissioning debris
Authority
Radioactive Materials License #UT1900479, Condition 10.5: “In accordance with the Licensee's
submittal to the NRC dated May 20, 1993, the Licensee is hereby authorized to dispose of byproduct
material generated at licensed in situ leach (ISL) facilities, subject to [...] conditions.” (Conditions are
cited below as Requirements.)
R3J3-12-3 (quoting JO CFR 40.4): “Byproduct Material means the tailings or wastes produced by the
extraction or concentration of uranium or thorium from any ore processed primarily for its source
material content, including discrete surface wastes resulting from uranium solution extraction
processes.”1
10 CFR Part 40 Appendix A, Criterion 2: “To avoid proliferation of small waste disposal sites and
thereby reduce perpetual surveillance obligations, byproduct material from in situ extraction operations,
such as residues from solution evaporation or contaminated control processes, and wastes from small
remote above ground extraction operations must be disposed of at existing large mill tailings disposal
sites; unless, considering the nature of the wastes, such as their volume and specific activity, and the
costs and environmental impacts of transporting the wastes to a large disposal site, such offsite disposal
1 This definition amends the language given in Section 11 e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act as amended in 1954 to include in
situ leach facilities on the same footing as conventional uranium mills. This is done by referencing “solution extraction” in
the definition. Text of the Atomic Energy Act as amended in 1954 can be found in NUREG-0980, Volume I, No. 10.
DRC-20 195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake Citv, UT
Mailing Address P O Box 144880 • Salt Lake City. UT 84114-4880
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] -TDD [phone]
ummi.deq iitnti.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
Second Quarter, 2017 ISL Decommissioning Debris Disposal Inspection Report
July 18,2017
Page 2
is demonstrated to be impracticable or the advantages of onsite burial clearly outweigh the benefits of
reducing the perpetual surveillance obligations.”
Requirements
1. Radioactive Materials License #UT1900479, Condition 10.5A: “Disposal of ISL waste is limited to
5,000 cubic yards from a single source.” The Division considers a source to be a discrete facility
defined by its geographic boundaries.2
2. Radioactive Materials License #UT1900479, Condition 10.5B: “All ISL contaminated equipment
shall be dismantled, crushed, or sectioned to minimize void spaces. Barrels containing waste other
than soil or sludges shall be emptied into the disposal area and the barrels crushed. Barrels
containing soil or sludges shall be verified by the Licensee to be full prior to disposal. Barrels not
completely full shall be filled with tailings or soil prior to disposal.”
3. Radioactive Materials License MJT1900479, Condition 10.5C: “All ISL waste shall be buried in
Cell No. 3 unless prior written approval is obtained from the Executive Secretary [now the Director]
for alternate burial locations.”
4. Radioactive Materials License #UT1900479, Condition 10.5D: “All disposal activities shall be
documented and records thereof maintained on-site. The documentation shall include descriptions of
the ISL waste and the disposal locations, as well as all actions required by this License condition.”
5. Radioactive Materials License #UT1900479, Condition 10.5E: “The Licensee shall also submit for
Executive Secretary approval a revised written Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for ISL disposal
on or before December 1, 2010. The revised SOP shall describe the documentation required for ISL
disposal, which shall include but is not limited to the following:”
(1) The material disposal area must be located on a tailings beach area of the disposal cell or on an
area of the cell that is underlain by tailings sands;
(2) The elevation of the material disposal area will not exceed the plane or grade of the elevations of
the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the tailings cell;
(3) Such ISL byproduct material will be segregated from any mill material and equipment disposed
of in the cells pursuant to License Condition 10.4, and the ISL byproduct material from each in
situ leach source will be segregated from the byproduct material from all other in situ leach
sources;
(4) Absence of void space inside barrels disposed, including physical verification before disposal;
and
(5) Detailed engineering drawings which demonstrate:
2 A “source” in this context is a geographically discrete facility. See Letter from Rusty Lundberg to Jo Ann Tischler dated
November 7, 2013 (DRC-2013-005682)
a. There are at least 4 feet of tailings sands under the bottom of each disposal area; and
b. The bottom of each disposal area is located at least 12 feet from the sides or dikes of the
tailings cell.
6. Radioactive Materials License #UT1900479, Condition 10.5F: The Licensee shall notify the
Executive Secretary in writing at least 7 calendar days prior to the proposed scheduled date for
disposal of any byproduct material generated at ISL facilities in the tailings cells.
An annual summary of the amounts of waste disposed of from off-site ISL generators shall be sent to
the Executive Secretary on or before November 1 of each calendar year.
Observations
Russell J. Topham, PE of the Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (the
Division), in the company of Phil Goble, Uranium Mill Section Manager observed disposal of three
loads of 1 le.(2) byproduct material on June 28, 2017 at the White Mesa Uranium Mill (the mill) owned
and operated by Energy Fuels Resources (the Licensee) in response to notification sent by the Licensee
dated June 4 and June 12, 2017. One load came from the Mestena/Alta Mesa Project near Encino,
Texas; two loads came from Cameco/Smith Ranch near Douglas, Wyoming. The Cameco loads were
the first received since the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) lifted a moratorium on shipments
from that facility following investigation of two leaking shipments from that facility to the White Mesa
Mill August 21, 2015 and March 29, 2016.
This inspection focused on the Licensee’s implementation of Standard Operating Procedure SOP PBL-
10, which governs disposal of 1 le.(2) byproduct material from in situ leach facilities. Incoming
shipments for all materials are subject to another procedure, SOP PBL-19.
While not a part of this inspection, the inspection team took the opportunity of this inspection to ask
about changes made to the protocols for receiving incoming shipments in response to the Cameco/Smith
Ranch leaking containers. The Licensee added to SOP PBL-19 new information gathering requirements
to employ when receiving a leaking load. The loads observed during this inspection were dry, so the
additional work specified in SOP PBL-19 was not required. For future reference, a blank copy of the
SOP PBL-19 information capture form appears as an attachment to this report.
Copies of paperwork obtained from field crews show that the Licensee used revision R-3.3 of SOP PBL-
10, dated November 13, 2014 for the operations observed. A copy of this paperwork is attached to this
report. Revision R-3.3 is the most recent version of the procedure.
The Licensee maintains a map of Tailings Cell 3 in the mill office that shows the dedicated disposal
location for each 1 le.(2) debris generator. Examination of that map reveals that if disposal operations
are limited to the lateral extents of the dedicated disposal plots and if the vertical location of placement
of material is limited to within two feet above and below the upper surface of the tailings, neither the
excavation nor the debris will endanger the integrity of the cell liner.
Second Quarter, 2017 ISL Decommissioning Debris Disposal Inspection Report
July 18,2017
Page 3
Lateral disposal pit locations are determined and located in the field by survey prior to excavation. The
bottom of the excavations is extended into the tailings sand, and the depth is surveyed prior to placement
of material into the excavation. Once the debris is placed in the excavation and compressed, the top of
waste is surveyed, after which cover soil is placed and compacted. Lateral locations were checked by
the inspector onsite. Disposal data packets attached to this report show that the vertical placement is
below the peripheral top of liner and well above the liner beneath the excavation.
The Licensee provided in SOP PBL-10 that material must be accepted for disposal prior to departure of
the transport vehicle from the generator. This allows the Licensee to ascertain that the material
characteristics meet the requirements for classification as 1 le.(2), material, and to verify that the
quantity to be shipped will not exceed the 5,000 cubic yard per source limit. Checks of running receipt
totals confirmed that the volume limits had not been exceeded. The material is checked upon receipt to
verify that what was shipped is what was expected.
Second Quarter, 2017 ISL Decommissioning Debris Disposal Inspection Report
July 18,2017
Page 4
Once the material is accepted for shipment, the receipt and burial are scheduled and the Licensee sends a
seven-day advance notice to the Division of the date scheduled for the burial event and number of loads
anticipated for disposal. The Division received the written notice on June 6 and 13, 2017.
Disposal Activities Observed
Photos 1 and 2 show the materials
disposed during the inspection.
The Cameco/Smith Ranch material
was miscellaneous debris, including
wire, pipe, fittings, pumps, filters,
etc. No sign of moisture was noted
either during pre-inspection walk-
around or during disposal.
The debris from Cameco/Smith
Ranch contained no material
requiring dismantling, sectioning or
crushing. None of the loads
included barrels, so License
Condition 10.5B does not apply to
the operations observed. Soil
should be able to fill voids in the
debris mass. Once placed, the
material is densified to minimize the
potential for excess differential
settlement of the tailings, cover
system and buried debris.
The Mestena/Alta Mesa material
was loose soil. No sign of
significant moisture was noted
either during pre-inspection walk-
around or during disposal.
Second Quarter, 2017 ISL Decommissioning Debris Disposal Inspection Report
July 18,2017
Page 5
Once placed, the material is densified to minimize the potential for excess differential settlement of the
tailings, cover system and buried debris.
Photo 3 shows the excavation
prepared to receive the
Mestena/Alta Mesa material. The
excavation extends through the
lighter-colored platform fill and to
the surface of the tailings. This
photo also depicts a crew member
assisting in the survey operation
used to determine the elevation of
the bottom of the pit. Results of the
survey operation are included in the
attachments to this report. Lateral
location of the pit was checked in
the Mill office.Photo 3: Surveying depth of excavation prepared for receipt of Cameco/Smith
Ranch Debris. Photo taken June 29, 2017.
Surveying of the depth of the
Cameco/Smith Ranch pit was
observed, but not photographed.
Results of the survey operation are
included in the attachments to this
report. The lateral location of the
pit was checked to verify the
distance between the edge of the pit
and the Cell 3 liner.
Photo 4 shows placement of
material from the Cameco/Smith
Ranch facility in the excavation
dedicated to receive material from
that source. No excess moisture
was observed in the debris during
placement.
Lateral location of the Mestena/Alta
Mesa pit was checked to verify the
distance between the edge of the pit
and the Cell 3 liner.
Photo 5 shows placement of
material from the Mestena/Alta
Mesa facility in the excavation
dedicated to receive material from
that source. No excess moisture
was observed in the debris during
placement.
Photo 4: Placing Cameco/Smith Ranch debris in excavation prepared for that
purpose. Photo taken June 29, 2017.
Photo 5: Placing Mestena/Alta Mesa material in excavation prepared for that
purpose. Photo taken June 29, 2017.
Second Quarter, 2017 ISL Decommissioning Debris Disposal Inspection Report
July 18, 2017
Page 6
Photo 6 shows the survey operation
to determine the top of the
Cameco/Smith Ranch debris. As
with the survey of the bottom of the
pits, the survey of the top of both
pits was observed. Only one photo
is included in this report. The
survey data is included as an
attachment to this report. The
survey data shows, and a check
against the drawing at the mill
office confirmed, that the top of
waste in both pits was below the
plane of the top of the flexible
membrane liner, as required.
•* •. *
...
' ' •. V’, ' ' • ■
Photo 6: Cameco/Smith Ranch pit being surveyed at top of waste. A partial soil
cap was placed prior to survey to facilitate walking on the waste. Photo taken June
29, 2017.
Photo 7 shows use of a piece of
heavy equipment to densify the
debris. The soil that was placed to
facilitate walking on the debris is
forced into the void spaces between
elements of the debris. The
operator uses the weight of the
loader, through the bucket and the
wheels, to compress the debris
mass. This operation was observed
for both the Cameco/Smith Ranch
and the Mestena/Alta Mesa
materials, but only the
Cameco/Smith Ranch photo is
included here.
Photo 8 shows placement of cover
soil over the densified debris. This
cover soil serves both to retain the
debris in the pit away from
environmental forces, and as part of
the platform fill/secondary Radon
barrier. The capping soil was
placed in lifts of about 12”
thickness and wheel-walked to
densify. Wheel-walking occurred
until the surface was firm and
unyielding. This operation was
observed for both excavations, but
only the Cameco/Smith Ranch
photo is included here.
Annual File Review’
Second Quarter, 2017 ISL Decommissioning Debris Disposal Inspection Report
July 18,2017
Page 7
In addition to the inspection of burial of the three loads of debris already described, the paper files for all
1 le.(2) material received since January 1, 2016 were reviewed. Table 1 provides a summary of the file
review data. In all cases, the data packets included all required data. The paperwork included, among
other things, the shipper’s manifest, generator’s description of the material, weigh ticket and radiological
survey on shipping from the generator and on receipt at the mill, the mill receiving agent’s description of
the material, and the mill’s 7-day notice to the Division of the scheduled burial date.
Generator
Number of Loads
2016 2017 to Date3 Total
Mestena/Alta Mesa 8 4 12
Uranez/Nichols Ranch 4 2 6
Uranium One Irigaray/Christensen 0 1 1
URI/Rosita 0 1 1
URI/Kingsville Dome 2 0 2
UEC/South Texas 1 0 1
UEC/La Palangana 1 0 1
Cameco/Smith Ranch 12 0 12
Cameco/Crow Butte 5 0 5
Cameco/North Butte 1 0 1
Cameco/Highland Ranch 2 0 2
Total 36 8 44
Table 1: Summary of 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposed in 2016 and First Half of 2017.
Cameco/Smith Ranch has sent its June loads in containers with an
absorbent material on their floors to prevent any fluid in the debris
from escaping the container. The inspection team did not get an
opportunity to observe the receipt of any loads of decommissioning
debris during the inspection on June 29, 2017. Photo 9 was taken by
the Licensee after the inspection team left the site, when another load
arrived. The Licensee asserts that the load captured in Photo 9 is
representative of the two loads buried during the inspection.
The Licensee is required by License Condition 10.5F to submit an
annual summary of 1 le.(2) byproduct disposal by November 1 of
each year. The 2016 summary is due November 1, 2017, and was
received on January 26, 2017. Table 2 provides the data from that
report through the end of 2016. Since review of this data was not
part of the quarterly inspection detailed in this report, actual year-to-
date data has not been incorporated. Running totals observed in
records at the mill office indicate that the Licensee is compliant with
the License Condition 10.5F limit of 5,000 cubic yards from any one
Photo 9: Container of ISL byproduct
material received June 29, 2017. Photo
taken by Energy Fuels Resources on June
29, 2017.
3 Excludes loads buried on the date of the inspection, for which paperwork was not yet completed. The paperwork for those
three loads is attached to this report.
Second Quarter, 2017ISL Decommissioning Debris Disposal Inspection Report
July 18, 2017
Page 8
source. Table 2 uses information provided by the Licensee following the inspection to arrive at the
volumes received in 2017 and the resulting volume received from each source since inception.
As Table 2 shows, four sources have sent over 80% of the quantity allowed by License Condition 10.5 A
per source. Of these four, two facilities are closed and are no longer shipping material.
Generator
Number of Cubic Yards
Jan 1,2016
Through
Dec 31,2016
Inception
Through
Dec 31,2016
Jan 1,2017
Through
Jun 30,2017
(Estimated)
Inception
Through
Jun 30,2017
(Estimated)
IEC (Closed)0.00 4920.00 0.00 4920.00
USX (Closed)0.00 4636.35 0.00 4636.35
Mestena/Alta Mesa 190.00 3317.65 125.00 3442.65
Uranez/Nichols Ranch 60.00 120.00 40.00 160.00
Uranium One Irigaray/Christensen 0.00 0.00 28.30 28.30
URI/Rosita 0.00 693.79 25.00 718.79
URI/Kingsville Dome 30.00 4869.26 0.00 4869.26
URI/Vasquez 0.00 105.70 0.00 105.70
UEC/South Texas 6.40 4027.90 0.00 4027.90
UEC/La Palangana 10.60 351.60 0.00 351.60
UEC/Goliad 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cameco/Smith Ranch 245.70 3419.18 24.70 3443.88
Cameco/Crow Butte 125.00 1555.00 0.00 1555.00
Cameco/North Butte 24.70 24.70 0.00 24.70
Cameco/Highland Ranch 49.40 3044.86 0.00 3044.86
Cameco/CPP 61.10 61.10 49.40 110.50
The mill produces its own 1 le.(2) byproduct material. License Condition 10.5E(3) requires that mill
material and ISL byproduct material be segregated. The map reviewed at the mill office clearly shows
plots assigned for burial of ISL byproduct material on roughly the east half of Cell 3 and roughly the
west half of Cell 3 reserved for waste generated by the mill. The inspection team observed that mill
waste is staged for burial around the west edge of the remaining solution pool in Cell 3, well away from
the areas reserved for ISL byproduct material. The inspectors also observed that the Licensee has placed
interim fill/secondary Radon barrier on approximately the western one-third of Cell 3.
Analysis
This section follows the same sequence and numbering convention used in the Requirements section
above. 1
1. License Condition 10.5 A limits the Licensee to 5,000 cubic yards of byproduct material per
source. The Licensee has an approval mechanism in place that provides it an opportunity to
accept or reject a proposed shipment based upon whether it meets qualifications as 1 le.(2)
material and whether accepting the material would cause the Licensee to exceed the allowable
quantity. As a further check, License Condition 10.5F, discussed below, requires the Licensee to
report annually to the Division the quantity of byproduct material received from each facility.
Second Quarter, 2017 ISL Decommissioning Debris Disposal Inspection Report
July 18,2017
Page 9
The information observed and gathered during this inspection supports a conclusion that the
Licensee is adhering to this license condition, and that the mechanisms in place are sufficiently
robust to assist the Licensee to comply.
2. License condition 10.5B governs disposal of drummed material or material of sufficient size to
be broken down into smaller segments to minimize introduction of void spaces in the cell cover.
The Licensee has in place Standard Operating Procedure SOP PBL-10 which is sufficiently
robust to insure compliance with License Condition 10.5B.
The operations required by License Condition 10.5B were not applicable to the materials being
disposed during the inspection.
3. License Condition 10.5C specifies Tailings Cell 3 as the required location for disposal of
byproduct material. The mapping, documentation and physical activities observed support a
conclusion that the Licensee is in compliance with this condition.
4. License Condition 10.5D requires the Licensee to document the nature of each load of byproduct
material received, where it is buried, and how it was handled, including all measures taken to
comply with all of License Condition 10.5, and to maintain those records onsite. The file review
completed at the time of the inspection demonstrated compliance with License Condition 10.5D.
Specifically, the maps and record packets contain sufficient information, and demonstrate
conclusively that the Licensee is tracking the nature of the material received, applying
appropriate standards in the handling and disposal of the material, making sufficiently detailed
records and maps, and maintaining those records and maps onsite.
5. License Condition 10.5E required the Licensee to submit a Standard Operating Procedure by
December 1, 2010 to govern the disposal operations for 1 le.(2) material received from in situ
leach uranium recovery facilities. The Licensee met the requirement to submit the procedure
with the initial version of SOP PBL-10, and now uses Revision R-3.3, dated November 13, 2014.
Revision R-3.3 addresses all of the items specified in License Condition 10.5. Revision R-3.3
also details necessary processes not specifically identified in the License Conditions. The
original version and every subsequent revision of this procedure was submitted to the Division
for review and approval prior to implementation.
6. License Condition 10.5F contains two requirements. The Licensee must notify the Division at
least seven days in advance of burying any byproduct material not generated onsite, and must
send an annual summary of all such material buried during the year to the Division by November
1 of the following year. The Division received notice at least seven days in advance of burial of
all 44 loads identified during the file review portion of the inspection, and for the three loads
disposed during the inspection. The three loads observed during the inspection were included in
1 le.(2) Byproduct Receipt Notifications the Licensee sent the Division, dated June 4 and June
12, 2017, and received June 6 and June 13, 2017. The annual report for 2016 disposal activities
arrived in the Division offices prior to the due date. The evidence gathered during this
inspection supports a conclusion that the Licensee is compliant with License Condition 10.5F.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The Licensee appears fully compliant with applicable laws, standards, requirements and License
Conditions with respect to disposal of 1 le.(2) byproduct material generated as decommissioning debris
' from In situ Leach uranium recovery facilities.
No new recommendations were identified during this inspection.
Attachments: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Receipt Notifications dated June 4 and June 12, 2017
Document packet for Mestena byproduct material bearing Shipper Number 169
Document packet for Cameco byproduct material bearing Shipper Numbers 2016-CPP-0002
Document packet for Cameco byproduct material bearing Shipper Numbers 20I7-CPP-0003
Licensee’s Feed Material Receipt Inspection Form from SOP PBL-19 (used for leaking loads)
Second Quarter, 2017 ISL Decommissioning Debris Disposal Inspection Report
July 18,2017
Page 10
I ENERGY FUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
6425 South Highway 191, PO Box 809
Blanding, UT. US, 84511
435 678 2221, fax [phone]
www.energyfuels.com
June 4, 2017
VIA Electronic Mail (PDF) and UPS
Mr. Scott Anderson
Director of Waste Management and Radiation Control
State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
PO Box 144880
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4880
Dear Mr. Anderson,
Div of Waste Management
and Radiation Control
JUN - 6 20t7
Re: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Receipt Notification
Pursuant to Radioactive Materials License (RML) UT1900479 condition 10.5.F, Energy Fuels Resources
(USA) Inc. is hereby notifying the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control that the White
Mesa Uranium Mill will be receiving and disposing of two loads by June 30, 2017.
If there are any questions regarding these shipments or the scheduling of the disposal activities feel free to
contact me at the White Mesa Mill at 435.678.4113.
Regards,
l
David Turk
Environmental Health & Safety Manager
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
cc: Denver Central Files
/ N
ENERGYFUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
6425 South Highway 191, PO Box 809
Blanding, UT. US, 84511
435 678 2221, fax [phone]
www.energyfuels.com
June 12, 2017
VIA Electronic Mail (PDF) and UPS
Mr. Scott Anderson
Director of Waste Management and Radiation Control
State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
PO Box 144880
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4880
Dear Mr. Anderson,
Div ct Wasle Manggsment
and Radiation Control
JUN 1 3 20!7
PftC-^017-00^-250
Re: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Receipt Notification
Pursuant to Radioactive Materials License (RML) UT1900479 condition 10.5.F, Energy Fuels Resources
(USA) Inc. is hereby notifying the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control that the White
Mesa Uranium Mill will be receiving and disposing of one load by June 30, 2017.
If there are any questions regarding this shipment or the scheduling of the disposal activities feel free to
contact me at the White Mesa Mill at 435.678.4113.
Regards,
David Turk
Environmental Health & Safety Manager
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
cc: Denver Central Files
! No.: PBL-10 ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
i Rev. No.: R-3.3 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Page 11 of 13
Date: November 13,I 2014 Title: lle.(2) Byproduct Disposal
ATTACHMENT 2
lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM
Date:__g-ZZ-ll__
Name of employee receiving the load: T^-r fc-
Generator of the Byproduct Material: _____
Shipper’s Manifest or Bill of Lading number: _______________
Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this load? Yes or
No
Who gave and when was the notification given?
___feawiek LcI±L7________________________________________
Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities:
___St. i- plwiro_____________p f /■-, ____
Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces? aJA
Have all drums with void spaces been filled vyith tailings sands or soil? /b//4-
Which tailings cell was the material placed in?__i l JT
Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain
by tailings sands?
AA___________________________fo.... A __________________cXoi^y ^ -Vn___________
.S .________________________________________________________________________________
Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell?
Ya:'
Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell?
No.: PBL-10 ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Rev. No.: R-3.3 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Page 12 of 13
Date: November 13,
2014
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Manifest or BOL #:___°l
Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area
by the engineer, specifically:
Engineer’s or
Environmental
Coordinator’s
Initials
Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary
for ISL waste disposal? Vr-i
Documentation of approval L>>irui aT/‘ISOVV1-? A 7 g?
Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other
ISL material? fej
Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. £'„// i j/e. z M-rta &
Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick?S?
Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet
thick?&
Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal
area? ^
Refer to drawings used to confirm r<// i Ca^i. 0r*~r'„as-&
Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or
dikes of the tailings cell? & i
Refer to drawings used to confirm. /+/ f3 &
Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the
elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell?
How was this confirmed (e.g., survey or review)&
~7
How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at
least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts?
A i—;c-J •- rH~. e~.1 i f~ H______________________
______________________________________________________________
Were void spaces filled with tailings?
Vts________________________ _________
Was the shipment properly covered?
Vm ''C-t A-jg-Qi/K.._____
*!'Ko.: PBL-10 j
; Rev.No.:R-3.3 |
Date: November 13. i
i
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: lle.(2)BjproductDisposal
| Page 13 of 13
2014 .L_.
Manifest or BOL #:___1 (s °\
Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator?
If required, where were settlement markers were placed?
___________________________________
Radiological receipt survey measurements:
__S- o ^t-l _ ,/O _____
Breathing Zone:
1. Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes o
2. If yes, what were the results of the sampling?
/l/A
Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities? /Ves or No
BILL OF LADING
SHIPMENT ID# 169 SHIPMENT DATE: June 20. 2017
SHIPPER (From):
EFR ALTA MESA LLC
CONSIGNEE (To):
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
6425 South Highway 191
Blanding, UT 84511
ADDRESS:
755 Co. Rd. 315 Encino, TX 78353
ADDRESS:
P. 0. Box 809, Blanding UT 84511
SHIPPER LICENSE NO.: RO5360 SHIPPER USDOT NO.:CONSIGNEE
LICENSE NO.:
UT-1900479
CONSIGNEE TELEPHONE NO.:
[phone]
SHIPPER LICENSE NO.:SHIPPER TELEPHONE
NO.:361-568-3549
CARRIER NAME AND ADDRESS:
Greenfield Logistics, LLC
PL
CARRIER USDOT CARRIER HAZMAT REG. NO.:
Trailer Container# GFLUDOfiB© ZOS Seal # Seal #
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL AND PACKAGING VOLUME
Cubic feet
or
QUANTITY
CLASSIFICATION
1 pkg.
RQ
UN2912, Radioactive Material, Low Specific Activity
(LSA-1) and soil, non-fissile,, Class 7
Dry 11 (E).2 By-Product materiaL
EMERGENCY CONTACT:
P. Luthiger: 1-361-816-0150
35,000 lbs.
(gross)
Low Specific Activity (LSA)
waste material and soil
Exclusive use shipment
Placards applied
CERTIFICATION: These is to certify that the above named articles are properly classified,
described, packaged, marked and labeled, and are in proper condition for transportation,
according to the applicable regulations of the Department of Transportation.
Shippers Signature:
Driver’s Signature:
Date: 'zADWT'
Date:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Corp.
White Mesa Mill Transaction No.
6425 S. Highway 191 53149
Blanding UT 34511
** Reprinted by 4 at 06/22/17 15:14:43 **
Vehicle ID:
Trailer ID:
Account ID:
Order ID:
Owner ID:
Material ID:
Destin. ID:
t4
MESTENA AL MESTENA ALTA PROJECT
11(e)2 Mat 11(e)2 Material Receipt
BLANDING
Date Time Scale
In: 06/22/2017 14:37 1
Out: 06/22/2017 15:14 1
Gross: 77860 lb (M)
Tare: 44060 lb
Net: 33800 lb
Comments:
Operator:
Signature
Charge! by Weight cR-M
61
Generator of Byproduct material: Mestena
Controled Elevation used (Cell 3) 5613.04
Area Elevation Transit Shot
Initial shot for trench 4.1
Top of trench 5610.19 6.95
Bottom of trench 5603.06 14.08
Initial shot used for material 4.1
Too of material in trench 5606.54 10.6
I
Top of cell 3 Liner 5608.5
Feet below liner 1.96
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
j Page II of 13
'• rNo.: ‘PBL-IO
| Rev. No.: R-3.3
Date: November 13,
2014
ATTACHMENT 2
lle.(2) BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM
Date: _£lz6iO-
Name of employee receiving the load: £<xrr.^
Generator of the Byproduct Material:
Shipper’s Manifest or Bill of Lading number: 2.0 16- __
Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this loai
No
Who gave and when was the notification given?
___ J _ wlc. .t,_________-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ir
Description of byproduct material disposal areayactivities:
. p. .U*_±g- £hJ=teL*
Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces?___AJA _____
Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil?_____A/A__________
Which tailings cell was the material placed in?____£-e-l t 3
Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain
by tailings sands?
_ __VOfvJ) I a____________________________________. T'-fi.S. 6-*^ As ,_______________________________________________________________
Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell?
. __________________________________________________________________________________:____________________________________________________
Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell?
No.: PBL-10 ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Rev. No.: R-3.3
Date: November 13,
2014
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 12 of 13
Zo '6 ■
Manifest or BOL #: c.(P - OQ& z-
Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area
by the engineer, specifically:
Engineer’s or
Environmental
Coordinator’s
Initials
Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary
for ISL waste disposal? '/es
Documentation of approval //Vv^c. fjuT/909v7ct A~>~7
Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other
ISL material? /es
Refer to plat(s) used to confinn. <f>// j j/e.z Art a
Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick?
Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet
thick?&
Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal
area?
Refer to drawings used to confirm £V// 3 &
Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or
dikes of the tailings cell? /es
Refer to drawings used to confirm. Celt 3 if
Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the
elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell?
Mo
How was this confirmed (e.g., survey or review)
__________________________________________________________________
a
How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at
least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts?
■A rc-^k__C f cA___________________________AvJi__ly, __fn
^6r- 1:^-4.
Were void spaces filled with tailings?
____teX
Was the shipment properly covered?
.....Vc-.S , Scc^.cJr?eu (______
| No.: PBL-10
Rev. No.: R-3.3
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES | Page 13 of 13 .
J Date: November 13,
i 2014
Title: 1 le.(2) B>product Disposal !
i !
Manifest or BOL #: Zcfc- cN~ooQ "z-
Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator?
AJA______________________
If required, where were settlement markers were placed?
A/.A_________________________
Radiological receipt survey measurements:
. _________________
Breathing Zone:
1.
2.
Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes o£No!>
If yes, what were the results of the sampling?
Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities^lor No
Shipper No. 2016-CPP-0002
STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING
ORIGrNAL—NOT NEGOTIABLE Carrier No. N/A
GREENFIELD LOGISTICS
(NAME OF CARRIER)(SCAC)
Date
Time
6/23/2017
16^0
Collected on Delivery shipments, the letters COD must appear before consignee's name or as otherwise
provided m item 430, Sec. I.
To: Consignee Energy Fuels
Street: 6425 South HWY 191
City: Blanding State: UT Zip Code: 84511
From: Shipper Cameco Resources
Street: 762 Ross Road
City: Douglas State: WY Zip Code: 82633
24 hr Emergency Contact Tel. No:[phone]
Route: See attached Vehicle
Number N/A
No.of units &
container type HM Basic Description
Proper Shipping Name. HaardCiass.Idcntificaiion Number (DM « NA), Pxkinggioup, per 172 101 172 202 172203
Total Quantity
(WaghL Volume, Gallon!, etc)
Weight
(Subject to
Correction)
Rate Charges
(ForCamcr Use Only)
Roll Off UN2912, RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, LOW SPECIFIC ACTIVITY (LSA-1),
CLASS 7 18.9 m* (24.7 yd")
RADIONUCLIDE: NATURAL URANIUM, THORIUM-230 AND RADIUM-
226
PHYSICAL FORM: SOLID
CHEMICAL FORM; UNAT WITH DAUGHTERS
TOTAL ACTIVITY: 1.25E8 Bq (0.00337 Ci)
TRANSPORT INDEX: N/A AS PER 49 CFR 172.203(d)(5)
CATEGORY LABEL: N/A AS PER 49 CFR 172.203(d)(4)
EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT:
PHIS VEHICLE IS ASSIGNED FOR EXCLUSIVE USE OF CAMECO
RESOURCES, INC. UNDER PROVISIONS OF 49 CFR 173.427 INCLUDING
EXEMPTING FROM MARKING AND LABELING REQUIREMENTS
DO NOT LOAD OTHER FREIGHT IN THIS VEHICLE. TRANSFER EN
ROUTE, OR BREAK SEAL_______________________________________
PLACARDS TENDERED:YES: X NO:
REMIT C O D TO
ADDRESS N/A
Notc<(1) When the rale it dependent on value, shippers an nquind to state
specifically on writing the agreed nr declared v «lue of the property as follow v The
igreed or declared value of the property is hereby specifically itaied bv the shipper to
be not exceedingj«cr_______
(2) Where ihe applicable tariff provisions specify a limitation of the earner’s liability
absent a ideese or a value deefaraimn by ihe shipper and the shipper dots not release
the earner s liability or declare a value, the carrier’s liability shall be hnulcd to Uic
evtcrn provrdedby such provisions. SceNMFLnem 172
(3) Commudines requiring special or additional .’arc or attention in handling or
stowing mud be so mailed and packaged as to ensure safe iroupartaiion Sec Secuon
2(c) of item 360 Bills of Lading. Freight Bills, tod batemcnis of Charges and Section
l(a)ol the Conn act terms and conditions for a list of such articles.
1 hochy declare ihnl (he conlents of this consignment are fully ard accurately described above by
the proper shipping name and sc classified, packaged, marked, and labcted/^riacaf d. and are m
all respects in proper coodmon for transport according to applicable international and national
governmental regulation*.
ON BEHALF OF SHIPPER
Sulijoa to Saoioin of H e coniiilions n ifcis
shipmeni is to be delivered to (he const pee without
recourse on the consignor the consignor ahull sign
the following statement.
The carrier shall not make delivery of this shipment
vnihout payment of freight and all other lawful
charge*
fSiKmuiBi: of Cornimiorl
PREPAID u
COLLECT
TOTAL
CHARr.FS
FREIGHT CHARGES
FREIGHT PREPAID
except when Check bo\ ifchaiges
box si nght □ are to be collected
is checked
RECEIVED. nb)C<.i ioiIk cUnifcaiwa tod unlliln efted on ■!* dale ut iaaic ofihii Bill ol Laduv ibe property dewnbed sbon: a apporcnl food order cvccpi at noted (ronienu «nd ccniiimn ol Mjn’tnw oi pnUgoi unLnoway. marked, uMwp'ud, and dcstusd u* aiduiad tbux '‘.tiicli uid earner (i be ■aord vtrrsei banj
ink.ULud 'hini^KouMlat eenirw* rKviing any n (u>ict«uii id'lk'r |nup>nly u-akn ll>« von(>»1) Bgirx-s kM^orv turliUMl p'M uf dcltwiv nio-J UcrtinaUun, if on n» nwle olher»ik* to irijvet to tioiho earner on Ihe route lo Mid dulnulion ll » irvliully ■|;nu.1 a% lo r»Oi isuiw: ul'atlui ui) cl. nitj
p<upcriy over all or ui> purtior of nwj route in deUmtian uid ai so each party M my time talereaiod in all or am u>d piopcrri ihai every icivmio be perlormed licieurdci xhaH be mbfcel n»N ihcbiS ol ladiap Kmutnd vOodiuaunilK gmcm-ngi.b^iru'iMraiikcdiiicofthc •Jnraiiovi
Skipper bvietiv vxnifat thtl he n LamiSar'with ail ihe Udiiq u-mi and ixndilkau in lEc lovcnun* ehujliialon and Ihe mxJ icmn nl unlit oro are ketch)-agreed lob> lie vtuppci and aevepted for hnxlfaad hiaasv^n
SHIPPER:CAMECO RESOURCES CARRIER:GREENFIELD LOGISTICS
PER
Y V
PER y
DATE DATE
Rev 41une 09, 2016
Page 1 of 1
WYO-RPP-FORM-031 Bill of Lading.xlsx
e hihy
RSO:
Operations:
Smith Ranch
Controled Elevation used (Cell 3)
Area Elevation
5612.27
Transit Shot
Initial shot for trench 6.38
Top of trench 5607.83 10.82
Bottom of trench 5602.55 16.1
Initial shot used for material 6.38
Too of material in trench 5606.69 11.96
Top of cell 3 Liner 5608.5
Feet below liner 1.81
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Corp.
White Mesa Mill
6425 S. Highway 191
Blanding UT 84511
** Reprinted by 4 at 06/26/17 07:34:08 **
Vehicle ID:
Trailer ID:
Account ID:
Order ID:
Owner ID:
Material ID:
Destin. ID:
13
11(e)2 WYO SMITH RANCH
11(e)2 Mat 11(e)2 Material Receipt
BLANDING
Comments: container gflu001235
1
£
Transaction No.
53153 .3
In:
Out:
Date Time Scale
06/26/2017 07:08 1
06/26/2017 07:33 1
Gross: 63440 lb (M)
Tare: 44600 lb
Net: 18840 lb
■V 4^'-
a.■jd•3•4
a
J"3
■ft
’Sfl
■ft
4.^
I*1
[No.: -PBL-lCf
| Rev. No.: R-3.3
j Date: November 13,
2014
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
Page 11 of 13
i
ATTACHMENT 2
lle-(2l BYPRODUCT MATERIAL DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION FORM
Date:__t.LzsllJ___
Name of employee receiving the load: _ T^rfW. SltscLc
Generator of the Byproduct Material: I'V
Shipper’s Manifest or Bill of Lading number: rZol~? - CPP- 0OO3>
Was the State of Utah given notice to the receipt/disposal activities associated with this load? (^e| or
No
Who gave and when was the notification given?
..IflirJC,
Description of byproduct material disposal area/activities:
^ f 4-
Has each drum been inspected to identify the presence of any void spaces?___Ay1 A ____
Have all drums with void spaces been filled with tailings sands or soil? ,aJA
Which tailings cell was the material placed in? f \ ( _________________
Was the material placed on a tailings beach area of the cell or on an area of the cell that was underlain
by tailings sands?
__ovf CJ-*, i* l iQ gi-r tk __f-r- U.....
__yu-t. __________________________________________________________
Was the material segregated from any Mill material or equipment disposed of in the cell?
Yo:____________________________________________________________________ ___________
Was the material segregated from byproduct material from other ISL sources disposed of in the cell?
. __Yti_______________________________________________________________
No.: PBL-10 ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Rev. No.: R-3.3 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Page 12 of 13
Date: November 13,
2014
Title: 11 e.(2) Byproduct Disposal 1i
Manifest or BOL #: -2 o i~7 - lPP-0C>C)3
Have the thickness and placement measurements been verified and documented for the disposal area
by the engineer, specifically:
Engineer’s or
Environmental
Coordinator’s
Initials
Was the material placed in a cell approved by the executive Secretary
for 1SL waste disposal? /ej
Documentation of approval UT/?0d</7r/ 7
Was the ISL material segregated from disposed Mill material and other
ISL material?
Refer to plat(s) used to confirm. CcJ/3 Hc-Z fliteosz/ &/■*#&
Was the maximum lift thickness above tailings less than 4 feet thick?\k?
Was the maximum lift thickness of subsequent lifts less than 2 feet
thick?
Has 4 foot of tailings sands been maintained under each disposal
area? Ye*
Refer to drawings used to confirm ^// 3 e?
Is the bottom of each disposal area at least 12 feet from the sides or
dikes of the tailings cell? yes
Refer to drawings used to confirm, yyi! 3
Will the elevation of the material exceed the plane or grade of the
elevation of the uppermost flexible membrane liner of the cell?
ASe
How was this confirmed (e.g., survey or review)
----------.................................. —______________________________________
&
How was the area compacted? Was each lift compacted by heavy equipment (such as a Cat D-6) at
least 4 times prior to placement of subsequent lifts?
I f-gj.--ke. f U frr___Ll&AC--__(fcJr__
-pcsz____LlC_L__________________________________________________________
Were void spaces filled with tailings?
_____Aas____________________________________________________________________
Was the shipment properly covered?
______^45, juLL__._____________
No.T.PBL-10
Rev. No.: R-3.3
Date: November 13.
2014
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
Title: 1 le.(2) Byproduct Disposal
i Page 13 of 13
—i
Manifest or BOL #: 'ton - c^PP-
Are additional settlement monitors required to be placed for this generator?
If required, where were settlement markers were placed?
_______UA_____________________________________
Radiological receipt survey measurements:
___PXD___£_g_ ________“jL U~r
Breathing Zone:
1.
2.
Was a Breathing Zone Sample collected? Yes or(
If yes, what were the results of the sampling?
Was a photograph taken during the unloading activities? /Yes)or No
Shipper No. 20I7-CPP-00Q3
STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING
ORIGrNAL—NOT NEGOTIABLE Carrier No.N/A
GREENFIELD LOGISTICS
(NAME OF CARRIER)(SCAC)
Date
Time
6/27/2017
ColInMuJ on Delivery shipments, the letters COD must appear before consignee's name or as olherwise
provided in item 430, Sec 1
~I,.SQ
To: Consignee Energy Fuels
Street: 6425 South HWY 191
City: Blanding State: UT Zip Code: 84511
From: Shipper Cameco Resources
Street: 762 Ross Road
City: Douglas State: WY Zip Code: 82633
24 hr Emergency Contact Tel. No:[phone]
Route: See attached Vehicle-
Number N/A
No.of noils &
container type HM Basic Description
Proper Shipping Ntme. Haz*rt Cltts.McnufictOon Numbei (UM or NA). Packing group per 172 101. 172-202, 172.203 Total Quantity
CW.tf.1, Volume, Callous, etc.)
Weight
(Subject to
Concctton)
Rate Charges
(For Camer Use Only)
Roll Off UN29I2, RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, LOW SPECIFIC ACTIVITY (LSA-1),
CLASS 7 18.9 m* (24.7 yd*)
RADIONUCLIDE: NATURAL URANIUM, THORIUM-230 AND RADIUM-
226
PHYSICAL FORM: SOLID
CHEMICAL FORM; UNAT WITH DAUGHTERS
TOTAL ACTIVITY: 1.25E8 Bq (0.00337 Ci)
TRANSPORT INDEX: N/A AS PER 49 CFR 172.203(d)(5)
CATEGORY LABEL: N/A AS PER 49 CFR 172.203(d)(4)
EXCLUSIVE USE SHIPMENT:
THIS VEHICLE IS ASSIGNED FOR EXCLUSIVE USE OF CAMECO
RESOURCES, INC. UNDER PROVISIONS OF 49 CFR 173.427 INCLUDING
EXEMPTING FROM MARKING AND LABELING REQUIREMENTS
DO NOT LOAD OTHER FREIGHT IN THIS VEHICLE, TRANSFER EN
ROUTE, OR BREAK SEAL
PLACARDS TENDERED:YES: X NO:
REMIT C O D TO
ADDRESS N/A
Nole-(l) When the rate is dependent on value, shippers are required to stale
specifically on writing the agreed or declared value of the property, as follows. Dm
agreed nr declared value of the property is hereby specifically stated by tbe shipper to
be not CMenduut i*i______
(2) Where the applicable tanlTprovisions speedy a lumtalion of (he earner’s liability
absent a release or a value declaration by the shipper and the shipper doc* not release
the carrier's liability or declare a value, the caniA'l liability shall be limited to the
Odenl provided bj such provisions SeeNMFL hem 172
P) Commodities requiring ipedal or atfirional care or attention in handling or
stowing mini be ao marked and packaged as to ensure soft transportation See Section
2(e) of hem 360 Bills of Lading. Freight Bills, and Statements ofChargcs and Section
I (a) of the Contract terms and conditions for a list of such snicks
hereby declare that the ecnteius of this consignment are futtv tad accurately described above by
the proper shipping name and are classified, packaged, marked, and labdcd'/plaurd. and are in
all respects to proper condiliem for transpan according to applicable interim tonal and national
governmental regulations
ON BRHAl.F OF SHIPPER
PREPAID □
COLLECT
Signage
ubjed to 5cction • ol i he conditions d ihrs
tupmenl is to be delivered to the consignee withoul
recourse on the consignor, the consignor shall sign
the following statement*
The earner shall not make delivery oftbis shipment
Tvilhoct paymoit of fnaghi and all other lawful
charges.
N/A
FREIGHT CHARGES
FREIGHT PREPAID
p< «hcn
bos at nghl
uchecked
Check box if charges
3 ire to be collected
RFCFTVFJ), adijeui 1o live i:IuuficaiKins ind twitTi >n cFa.t on lb* Out ol tuoe of rfeii Bit] rf Lodcaa- Ibe properly detenbod above *frp*rCTl gont cuefX ruled (ccwUetU ml ocodnun of oonicn] of pacLipcs snbtcrti), nurlccj. Mr.*
urdcrtiood ihroughoat Ubi onniivuliSBic—^ciyFeratfi wwoipommiw wpawrwion nfOmprercrty yaderfte c<wtnid)«ycei loe»nv fcuttiaual pbw (if delivciy «mrfieihnniiw> ifnnilwarte glhrrW* to 4<lim to unba earner on ihe
pmperty over •Ilor wv'^rtioaot'MidroulalorUvtinatHUavd pany««ay limcoKcreitediialloran'mdivofcrtv ihelewry aerner la he (nrfmiiBd kereundei ihafl be MitjKS loaP (ha Ulof ladta lena> md ocnfaliooi i» Ihcgmeiiuu duvluu
Shipper tenbycerutk* that ha a feailiar wift all ihe lading temu and uoiditm ai (he gotcmnG daiitKaln nl die od icrmi mti coodiboni ore beiaby agraad In by (he thrppcr and atKCfled far tumidf ai4 hn armpn
dcmneS a, ■rtMtcrf abow »hith and eanv
rubai tl n mutually agreed at lo ca
»ihe dtfe ollhe darmal
r (ihe word omer being
l k«mer ol alt nr n) of. md
SHIPPER:CAMECO RESOURCES
PER
DATE
CARRIER:GREENFIELD LOGISTICS
per ft/E cL
DATE C-ZF-IT-
Rev4Iune09, 2016
Page 1 of 1
WYO-RPP-FORM-031 Bill of Lading.xlsx
RSO:
Operations:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Corp.
White Mesa Mill
6425 S. Highway 191
Blanding UT 84511
** Reprinted by 4 at 06/28/17 07:26:58 **
Vehicle ID:
Trailer ID:
Account ID:
Order ID:
Owner ID:
Material ID:
Destin. ID:
T3
11(e)2 WYO SMITH RANCH / HIGHLAND
11(e)2 Mat 11(e)2 Material Receipt
BLANDING
In:
Out:
Transaction No.
53157
Date Time
06/28/2017 06:57
06/28/2017 07:26
Gross:
Tare:
Net:
63600 lb (M)
44820 lb
18780 lb
Comments: TRL # GFLU 001041
Operator: 4 Charge by Weight
Signature:
Smith Ranch
Controled Elevation used (Cell 3) 5612.27
Area Elevation Transit Shot
Initial shot for trench 6.38
Top of trench 5607.83 10.82
Bottom of trench 5602.55 16.1
Initial shot used for material 6.38
Too of material in trench 5606.69 11.96
Top of cell 3 Liner 5608.5
Feet below liner 1.81
SU. ^ '
<ZCrn -C ??' 0003
Feed Material Receipt
Name of generator of shipment:
Bill of Lading #:
Activity in Curies:
Radionuclides:_________________________________
The amount of material that leak out of the package (if known):
The amount of material that leak out of the conveyance (if known):
Can it be determined when the leak occurred?
Corrective Actions:
RSO:
(Print Name)(Signature)