DRC-2012-001822 - 0901a06880304888

D:<C- 2012-00 1822
EnErgy FUEIS REsaurcES IU5FI) Inc.
August 29, 2012
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
PO Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 2nd Quarter 2012 Nitrate Monitoring Report
UDEQ Docket No. UGVy^-09-03 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr Lundberg
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitonng Report for the 2nd Quarter of
2012 as required by the January 2009 Stipulated Consent Agreement, UDEQ Docket No UGW-09-03, as well
as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report
Ifyou should have any questions regarding this report please contact me
Yours very truly,
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC
Jo Ann Tischler
Director, Compliance
CC David C Frydenlund
Harold R Roberts
David E Turk
Katharine A Weinel
Central Files
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc 225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228 Phone [phone]
August 29, 2012
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 2nd Quarter 2012 Nitrate Monitoring Report
UDEQ Docket No. UGW-09-03 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the 2nd Quarter of
2012 as required by the January 2009 Stipulated Consent Agreement, UDEQ Docket No. UGW-09-03, as well
as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours. very truly, J ' .. ' ., ~~
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Jo Ann Tischler
Director, Compliance
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Katherine A. Weinel
Central Files
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
Lakewood, CO 80228
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Phone: [phone]
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Nitrate Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Stipulated Consent Agreement, January 2009
Docket No. UGW09-03
2nd Quarter
(April through June)
2012
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
(formerly Denison Mines (USA) Corp.)
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
August 29, 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 4
1.1 Quality Assurance Plan Modifications during the Quarter .................................. 4
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING ................................................ 5
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ..................................... 5
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring ...................................................................................... 5
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed .................................................................................. 6
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring .................................................. 6
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures ....... 6
2.2.1 Well Purging and Depth to Groundwater ................................................... 6
2.2.2 Sample Collection ....................................................................................... 7
2.3 Field Data ............................................................................................................ 8
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map .............................. 9
2.5 Laboratory Results .............................................................................................. 9
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results ........................................................................ 9
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................... 9
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION ................................. 10
3.1 Field QC Samples ............................................................................................. 10
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ................................................................... 11
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ......................................................................... 11
3.4 Data Validation ................................................................................................. 11
3.4.1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation .................................................................. 11
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation .......................................................................... 12
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ............................................................... 12
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist .................................................................... 12
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation ...................................................................... 12
3.4.6 QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates ............................................... 13
3.4.7 Rinsate Check ........................................................................................... 13
3.4.8 Other Laboratory QAlQC ......................................................................... 14
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA ....................................................................... 15
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions ........... 15
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map ................................................... 15
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater
Contour Map for Previous Quarter ........................................................... 15
4.1.3 Hydrographs .............................................................................................. 15
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation ................. 16
4.2 Review of Analytical Results ............................................................................ 16
4.2.1 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps ............................... 16
4.2.2 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs .................... 16
4.2.3 Interpretation of Analytical Data .............................................................. 16
5.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ................................................................. 17
5.1 Identification and Definition of the Problem ......................................................... 17
5.2 Assignment of Responsibility for Investigation of the Problem ....................... 17
5.3 Investigation and Determination of Cause of the Problem ............................... 17
5.4 Determination of a Corrective Action to Eliminate the Problem ..................... 18
1
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\201Z QZ\201Z QZ Nitrate Report text.docx
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
6.0
7.0
8.0
Assigning and Accepting Responsibility for Implementing the Corrective
Action ............................................................................................................... 18
Implementing the Corrective Action and Evaluating Effectiveness ................. 18
Verifying That the Corrective Action Has Eliminated the Problem ................. 18
Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions ..................................... 18
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ 19
ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT .............................................. 19
SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ........................................................... 20
2
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
Table 2 Nitrate Percent Difference
Table 3 Chloride Percent Difference
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-l Field Data QAIQC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H -6 QC Control limits for Analysis and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
3
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Utah Department of Environmental Quality ("UDEQ") Division of Radiation
Control ("DRC") noted in a Request dated September 30, 2008 (the "Request"), for a
Voluntary Plan and Schedule to Investigate and Remediate Nitrate Contamination at the
White Mesa Uranium Mill (the "Mill") (the "Plan"), that nitrate levels have exceeded the
State water quality standard of 10 mg/L in certain monitoring wells. As a result of the
Request, Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. ("EFR") (formerly Denison Mines (USA)
Corp.) entered into a Stipulated Consent Agreement (the "Consent Agreement") with the
Utah Water Quality Board in January 2009 which directed the preparation of a Nitrate
Contamination Investigation Report ("CIR") and Quarterly Nitrate Monitoring Reports.
A subsequent letter dated December 1,2009, among other things, recommended that EFR
also address elevated chloride concentration in the Nitrate Monitoring Reports. The
Consent Agreement ("CA") was amended in August 2011. Under the amended Consent
Agreement, EFR submitted a Corrective Action Plan ("CAP"), pursuant to the
requirements of the Utah Groundwater Quality Protection Rules [UAC R317-6-6.15(C-
E)] on November 29, 2011 and revised versions of the CAP on February 27, 2012 and
May 7, 2012.
This is the Quarterly Nitrate Monitoring Report, as required under the Consent
Agreement, State ofUDEQ Docket No. UGW-09-03 for the second quarter of2012.
1.1 Quality Assurance Plan Modifications during the Quarter
During the first and second quarter of 2012, Revision 6 of the approved Quality
Assurance Plan ("QAP"), dated March 22, 2010, was revised on March 26, 2012
(Revision 7.0), May 25, 2012 (Revision 7.1) and June 6, 2012 (Revision 7.2). Revision
7.0, dated March 26, 2012, incorporated changes requested by Division of Radiation
Control ("DRC") in correspondence dated February 7, 2012. The changes were
requested to address field sampling procedures for low yield wells consistent with U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency ("EP A") guidance documents. EFR submitted
Revision 7.0 of the QAP on March 26, 2012. Revision 7.1 was submitted on May 25,
2012 to address minor changes to Revision 7.0 noted by DRC. Revision 7.1 was
approved by DRC in correspondence dated May 30, 2012. EFR noted on June 6, 2012
that there were typographical errors in Revision 7.1 that interfered with field operations
and submitted Revision 7.2 on June 6, 2012 to correct these typographical errors. DRC ·
approved Revision 7.2 on June 7, 2012.
Samples were collected during the second quarter 2012 from April 18, 2012 through
April 20, 2012 using the procedures contained in the approved QAP, Revision 6.0.
Samples collected in the third quarter of 2012 will be purged and sampled in accordance
with Revision 7.2 of the QAP.
4
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing
wells, temporary chloroform contaminant investigation wells and temporary nitrate
investigation wells is attached under Tab A. Nitrate samples and measurements taken
during this reporting period (April through June 2012), are discussed in the remainder of
this section.
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring
Quarterly sampling for nitrate monitoring parameters was performed in the following
wells:
TWN-1 TWN-8 TWN-15 Piezometer 3
TWN-2 TWN-9 TWN-16
TWN-3 TWN-10 TWN-17
TWN-4 TWN-11 TWN-18
TWN-5 TWN-12 TWN-19
TWN-6 TWN-13 Piezometer 1
TWN-7 TWN-14 Piezometer 2
Table 1 provides an overview of all locations sampled during the current period, along
with the date samples were collected from each location, and the date( s) upon which
analytical data were received from the contract laboratory. Table 1 also identifies rinsate
samples collected, as well as sample numbers associated with any required duplicates.
As indicated in Table 1, nitrate monitoring was performed in all of the nitrate monitoring
wells, and Piezometers 1, 2, and 3. Analytical data for all of the nitrate wells, and the
piezometers are included in Tab G.
Pursuant to EFR's agreements with DRC during the December 2011 conference calls
regarding the pH investigation, EFR immediately stopped filling the Upper Wildlife Pond
("UWLP") at the Mill. In the past, EFR has sampled the UWLP during the quarterly
nitrate sampling program. As a result of not filling the UWLP, there was insufficient
water in the pond to allow collection of a representative sample. Additionally, the cows
that graze in the area wallowed in and defecated in the remaining water. These two
factors would most likely have caused some analytical difficulties and erroneous data.
Due to current conditions at the time of the nitrate sampling program, that is, the minimal
volume of water and the likelihood that the water is contaminated, EFR ceased sampling
of the UWLP. EFR notified DRC of this sampling change via e-mail on April 18,2012
and received a written e-mail response and agreement from DRC on that same day.
Nitrate and chloride are also monitored in all of the Mill's groundwater monitoring wells
and chloroform investigation wells. Data from those wells for this quarter are
5
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
incorporated in certain maps and figures in this report but are discussed in their respective
programmatic reports.
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed
Locations sampled during this reporting period were analyzed for the following
constituents:
• Inorganic Chloride
• Nitrate plus Nitrite as Nitrogen (referred to herein as nitrate)
Use of analytical methods consistent with the requirements found in Revision 6 of the
QAP was confirmed for all analytes, as discussed later in this report.
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells andlor piezometers, pursuant
to Part I.E.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permit (the "GWDP") (dated July 14,2011):
• The quarterly groundwater compliance monitoring wells.
• Existing well MW -4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation wells.
• Piezometers -P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-S.
• MW-20, MW-22, and MW-34.
• The DR piezometers which were installed during the Southwest Hydrogeologic
Investigation.
• Nitrate monitoring wells.
• In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in
conjunction with sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and
accelerated efforts, regardless of the sampling purpose.
All well levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded
within S calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the
summary sheet under Tab C.
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures
The QAP provides a detailed presentation of procedures utilized for groundwater
sampling activities under the GWDP (July 14,2011).
The sampling methodology, equipment and decontamination procedures that were
performed for the nitrate contaminant investigation, as summarized below, are consistent
with the QAP.
2.2.1 Well Purging and Depth to Groundwater
A list of the wells in order of increasing nitrate contamination is generated quarterly. The
order for purging is thus established. The list is included with the Field Data Worksheets
6
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
under Tab B. Mill personnel start purging with all of the non-detect wells and then move
to the more contaminated wells in order of nitrate contamination, starting with the wells
having the lowest nitrate contamination.
Before leaving the Mill office, the pump and hose are decontaminated using the cleaning
agents described in Section 6.2.5 of the QAP. A rinsate blank is collected after the first
pump decontamination of each day as described below. Mill personnel then proceed to
the first well which is the well with the lowest concentration (i.e. non-dectect) of nitrate
based on the previous quarter's sampling results. Well depth measurements are taken and
the two casing volumes are calculated (measurements are made using the same
instrument used for the monitoring wells under the Mill's GWDP). The Grundfos pump
(a 6 to 10 gallon per minute [gpm] pump) is then lowered to the bottom of the well and
purging is begun. At the first well, the purge rate is measured for the purging event by
using a calibrated 5 gallon bucket. After the evacuation of the well has been completed,
the well is sampled when possible, and the pump is removed from the well and the
process is repeated at each well location moving from the least contaminated to most
contaminated well. If sample collection is not possible due to the well being purged dry a
sample is collected after recovery as described below. All wells are capped and secured
prior to leaving the sampling location.
Decontamination of non-dedicated equipment, using the reagents in Section 6.2.5 of the
QAP, is performed between each sample location, and at the beginning of each sampling
day, in addition to the pre-event decontamination described above.
2.2.2 Sample Collection
Wells
Following the purging of a nitrate investigation well, the sampling takes place once
stabilization has been achieved in accordance with Section 6.2.7 of the QAP. Prior to
leaving the Mill office for sampling, Mill Personnel prepare a cooler with ice. A trip
blank is not required as the sampling event does not include analyses for Volatile Organic
Compounds ("VOCs"). Once Mill Personnel arrive at the well sites, labels are filled out
for the various samples to be collected. All personnel involved with the collection of
water and samples are then outfitted with rubber gloves to avoid sample contamination.
Each sample collection event begins at the locations which are non-detect for nitrate
(based on the previous quarter's data) and proceeds by concentration to the location with
the highest concentration (based on the previous quarter's data). The dedicated portable
pump is appropriately decontaminated prior to each sampling event, each sampling day,
and between well samples. It is important to note that the rinsate blank sample frequency
was modified during the fourth quarter 2010 as recommended by UDEQ personnel
present on site for split sampling during the chloroform sampling program. Previously, a
rinsate blank sample was collected after each decontamination of the nondedicated pump
and prior to the next use of the pump.
Per an e-mail from Mr. Phil Goble, dated November 15,2010, the decreased rinsate blank
frequency implemented during the chloroform sampling program was acceptable for
7
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
implementation on the nitrate sampling program. Based on the revised procedure, rinsate
blank samples are only required at the beginning of the sampling event and at the
beginning of each day of purging. The frequency change was implemented during fourth
quarter 2010. The rinsate blank sample frequency will be modified again during the third
quarter 2012 sampling event pursuant to UDEQ approval of the Groundwater QAP,
Revision 7.2 on June 7, 2012. The frequency for rinsate blank samples will be one
rinsate blank sample for every 20 field samples.
Samples are taken from the portable pump after stabilization has been achieved, unless
the well is pumped dry. If the well is pumped dry, Mill personnel use a disposable bailer
to sample the well after it has recovered in accordance with Section 6.2.7 of the QAP.
The bailer is attached to a reel of approximately 150 feet of nylon rope and then lowered
into the well. After coming into contact with the water, the bailer is allowed to sink into
the water in order to fill. Once full, the bailer is reeled up out of the well:'
Sample bottles are filled as follows:
• First, a 250 ml sample is collected for nitrate/nitrite. This sample is not filtered,
but is preserved with H2S04.
• Second, a 500 ml sample is collected for chloride. This sample is not filtered and
is not chemically preserved.
After the samples have been collected for a particular well, the samples are placed into
the cooler that contains ice. The well is then recapped and Mill personnel proceed to the
next well. If a bailer has been used it is disposed of.
Piezometers
Samples are collected from Piezometers 1, 2 and 3, if possible. Samples are collected
from piezometers using a disposable bailer following the procedures described for wells
that have been pumped dry, above. However, due to the difficulty in obtaining samples
from the piezometers, the purging protocols set out in the QAP are not followed.
After samples are collected, the bailer is disposed-of and samples are placed into a cooler
containing ice for sample preservation and transit to the Mill's contract analytical
laboratory, EL.
2.3 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all Field Data Worksheets that were completed
during the quarter for the nitrate contaminant investigation monitoring wells, and
piezometers identified in Section 2.1.1 above, and Table 1. It is important to note that the
field data sheet appearance was changed in the fourth quarter 2010 as a result of the
implementation of an electronic data capture system. The field data sheets contain the
same information as the approved field . data sheet attached to the approved QAP in
approximately the same location. The new data sheets allow the electronic capture of
8
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report textdocx
data while still maintaining the real-time recording of information manually in ink as
required by UDEQ. The changes were made to accommodate the data recording and
validation system. Revised field forms will be used during the third quarter 2012
sampling event. The revised field forms are based on the changes approved in the
Groundwater QAP, Revision 7.2. Approval of the QAP, Revision 7.2 was received June
7, 2012.
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map
Depth-to-groundwater measurements which were utilized for groundwater contours are
included on the Quarterly Depth to Water Sheet at Tab C of this Report along with the
kriged groundwater contour map for the current quarter generated from this data. All
well levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5
calendar days of each as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under
Tab C. A copy of the kriged groundwater contour map generated from the previous
quarter's data is provided under Tab D.
2.5 Laboratory Results
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
All analytical results were provided by EL. Table 1 lists the dates when analytical results
were reported to the Quality Assurance ("QA") Manager for each well or other sample.
Results from analysis of samples collected for this quarter's nitrate investigation are
provided under Tab G of this Report. Also included under Tab G are the results of
analyses for duplicate samples and rinsate samples for this sampling effort, as identified
in Table 1. See the Groundwater Monitoring Report and Chloroform Monitoring Report
for this quarter for nitrate and chloroform analytical results for the groundwater
monitoring wells and chloroform investigation wells not listed in Table 1.
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework
As discussed in Section 1.0 above, the Request, Plan, and Consent Agreement each
triggered a series of actions on EFR's part. Potential surficial sources of nitrate and
chloride have been described in the December 30, 2009 CIR and additional investigations
into potential sources were completed. Pursuant to the Consent Agreement, the most
recent version of the CAP was submitted to the Director of the Division of Radiation
Control on May 7, 2012. The CAP describes future activities associated with the nitrate
in groundwater. The CAP is currently undergoing public review and comment prior to
final approval by the Director. This quarterly report documents the continued monitoring
consistent with the program described in the initial Nitrate Contamination Investigation
Report submitted in 2009. The monitoring program and reporting requirements set forth
in the 2009 Contamination Investigation report will remain in effect until further notice
and completion of the CAP.
9
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION
The Mill QA Manager performed a QAlQC review to confirm compliance of the
monitoring program with requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA
includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures,
an analyte completeness review, and QC review of laboratory data methods and data.
Identification of field QC samples collected and analyzed is provided in Section 3.1.
Discussion of adherence to Mill sampling Standard Operating Procedures ("SOPs") is
provided in Section 3.2. Analytical completeness review results are ' provided in Section
3.3. The steps and tests applied to check field data QAlQC, holding times, receipt
temperature and laboratory data QAlQC are discussed in Sections 3.4.1 through 3.4.7
below.
The analytical laboratory has provided summary reports of the analytical QAlQC
measurements necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental
Laboratory Accreditation Conference ("NELAC") certification and reporting protocol.
The Analytical Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports, including copies of the Mill's
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record forms for each set of Analytical
Results, follow the analytical results under Tab G. Results of review of the laboratory
QAlQC information are provided under Tab H and discussed in Section 3.4, below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the
analytical laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field
sampling program.
Field QC samples for the nitrate investigation program consist of one field duplicate
sample for each 20 samples, one DI Field Blank ("DIFB") and equipment rinsate
samples.
During the quarter, two duplicate samples were collected as indicated in Table 1. The
duplicates were sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same
parameters as the nitrate wells.
Rinsate samples were also collected at the beginning of the sampling period and at the
beginning of each day of purging from the decontaminated pump used for purging and
sampling. Rinsate samples were labeled with the name of the subsequently sampled well
with a terminal letter "R" added (e.g. TWN-7R). During the quarter three rinsate samples
were collected and were sent to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same
parameters as the nitrate wells. The results of these analyses are included with the routine
analyses under Tab G.
10
. N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the existing sampling SOPs, the QA
Manager observed that QAlQC requirements established in the QAP were being adhered
to and that the SOPs were implemented, except as noted below.
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for nitrate monitoring for the period were performed.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAP and GWDP (July 14, 2011) identify the data validation steps and data QC
checks required for the nitrate monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements, .
the QA Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QAlQC evaluation, a
holding time evaluation, an analytical method check, a reporting limit evaluation, a QC
evaluation of sample duplicates, a QC evaluation of control limits for analysis and
blanks, a receipt temperature evaluation, and a rinsate evaluation. Because no VOCs are
analyzed for the nitrate contamination investigation, no trip blanks are required in the
sampling program. Each evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check
tables indicating the results of each test are provided under Tab H.
3.4.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their
adherence with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of
information: the Field Data Sheets and the Quarterly Depth to Water summary sheet.
Review of the Field Data Sheets addresses well purging volumes and stability of five
parameters: conductance, pH, temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Review of the
Depth to Water data confirms that all depth measurements used for development of
groundwater contour maps were conducted within a five-day period of each other. The
results of this quarter's review are provided under Tab H.
Based upon this review, all well locations conformed to the QAP (Revision 6)
requirement to evacuate two well casing volumes before sampling except TWN-2, TWN-
3, TWN-7, TWN-9, TWN-14, TWN-15, and TWN-17. These seven wells were all
pumped to dryness before two casing volumes were evacuated and more than one set of
field parameters could be collected. In each case, representative samples of formation
water were collected after the wells were allowed to recover. Piezometers 1, 2, and 3
were not pumped, and were sampled directly after measurement of one set of parameters.
Two casing volumes were pumped from TWN -10 before it was purged to dryness;
however, only one set of field parameters were collected prior to TWN-10 being pumped
dry.
During review of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel
consistently recorded depth to water for the quarterly sampling programs to the nearest
11
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
0.01 foot.
All field parameters for all wells were within the QAP required limits, as indicated
below.
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP requirements resulted in the
observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Section 6.2.7 specifically state that
field parameters must have stabilized to within 10% over at least 2 consecutive
measurements. The QAP states that turbidity should be less than 5 Nephelometric
Turbidity Units ("NTU") prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that
has a higher turbidity. The QAP does not require that turbidity measurements must be
less than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such, the noted observations regarding turbidity
measurements less than 5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• Fifteen well measurements and the measurement from Piezometers 3 exceeded
the QAP's 5 NTU turbidity goal as noted in Tab H. All turbidity RPD's met the
QAP Requirement to stabilize within 10%.
EFR's letter to DRC of March 26, 2010 discusses further why turbidity does not appear
to be an appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to DRC's
subsequent correspondence dated June 1, 2010 and June 24, 2010, EFR has completed a
monitoring well redevelopment program. The redevelopment report was submitted to
DRC on September 30, 2011. Redevelopment results will be discussed with DRC in an
effort to come to a consensus regarding turbidity considerations for the nitrate wells at the
Mill site.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample
holding time checks are provided in Tab H. All samples were received and analyzed
within the required holding time.
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement
in QAP Table 1 that samples be received at 6°C or lower. Sample temperatures checks
are provided in Tab H. All samples were received within the required temperature limit.
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by the laboratory were checked against the required
methods enumerated in the QAP. Analytical method checks are provided in Tab H. All
methods were consistent with the requirements of the QAP.
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits reported by the laboratory were checked against
the reporting limits enumerated in the QAP. Reporting Limit Checks are provided in Tab
12
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
H. All analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting limits, with the
exception of 7 samples that had increased reporting limits due to matrix interference or
required dilution due to the sample concentration. However, in all of those cases the
analytical results were greater than the reporting limit used.
3.4.6 QAJQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of
duplicate and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the
duplicate and original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured
results (described as activities in the QAP) are less than 5 times the required detection
limit. This standard is based on the EPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-01 as cited
in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for all duplicate pairs for all analytes regardless of
whether or not the reported concentrations are greater than 5 times the required detection
limits. However, data will be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater
than 5 times the required detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%. The additional
duplicate information is provided for information purposes.
All duplicate results were within a 20% RPD. Results of the RPD test are provided in Tab
H.
3.4.7 Rinsate Check
Rinsate checks are provided in Tab H.
Chloride
A review of the analytical· results reported for rinsate blank samples indicated that one of
the rinsate blank samples contained chloride. A DIFB was analyzed and the results
indicated that it also contained chloride. A comparison of the rinsate blank sample
concentration levels to the QAP requirements -that rinsate sample concentrations be one
order of magnitude lower than that of the actual well -indicated that the rinsate blank
sample with a detection of chloride did not meet this criterion.
This criterion however, is irrelevant and inappropriate for the rinsate blank sample data
collected during the nitrate sampling because rinsate blank samples are collected from the
decontaminated portable pump used for well purging, and the pump is not used for
sample collection. As stated in Section 2.2.1, wells that do not have a dedicated pump
are purged using a portable pump. In wells where the portable pump is used for purging,
a disposable bailer is used to collect the samples the day following purging activities.
Based on the investigation into the source of chloride, EFR believes that the potential
source for the chloride present in the rinsate blanks has been identified. Chloride is
frequently a byproduct of the chlorination process in potable water supplies.
13
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
EFR believes the chloride contamination in the DI water is most likely the result of
chlorination of the intake water used for the DI system. The chloride is most likely the
result of the chlorination of the potable water at the Mill which is subsequently fed to the
DI system. The chlorine added reacts with the naturally occurring organic and inorganic
materials in the water.
Corrective actions for this issue are described in Section 5.1.
3.4.8 Other Laboratory QA/QC
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QAlQC Manager check the
following items in developing data reports: (l) sample preparation information is correct
and complete, (2) analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate Analytical
Laboratory procedures are followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5)
QC samples are within established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7)
special sample preparation and analytical requirements have been met, and (8)
documentation is complete. In addition to other laboratory checks described above,
EFR's QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items (5) and (6)) to confirm that
the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for spike duplicates are
within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative sufficiently explains
any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are provided in Tab H.
All lab QAlQC results met these specified acceptance limits except as noted below.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that an MS/MSD (referred to as Duplicate Spike [Matrix
spike] in the QAP) pair be analyzed with each analytical batch. The QAP does not
specify acceptance limits for the MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the
MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFR samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are
set by the laboratories. The review of the information provided by the laboratories in the
data packages verified that the QAP requirement to analyze an MS/MSD pair with each
analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not require it, the recoveries were
reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established acceptance limits. The QAP
does not require this level of review, and the results of this review are provided for
information only.
The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the
MS/MSDs recoveries and the associated RPDs for all quarterly nitrate samples are within
acceptable laboratory limits for all regulated compounds as indicated in Tab H. The QAP
requirement to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such
the data are compliant with the QAP.
The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the LCS
recovenes were acceptable which indicate that the analytical system was operating
properly.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a
reagent blank. All analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a blank sample
14
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
made and carried through all analytical steps. For the Mill samples, a method blank is
prepared for all analytical methods. The information from the Laboratory QAlQC
Summary Reports indicates that the method blanks did not contain detections of any
target analytes above the RL.
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions.
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the current quarter (shown as
depth to groundwater in feet) is included under Tab C. The data from this tab has been
interpreted (kriged) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under the same
tab. The contour map is based on the current quarter's data for all wells.
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater
Contour Map for Previous Quarter
The groundwater contour maps for the Mill site for the previous quarter, as submitted
with the Nitrate Monitoring Report for the previous quarter, are attached under Tab D.
A comparison of the water table contour maps for the current (second) quarter of 2012 to
the water table contour maps for the previous quarter (first quarter of 2012) indicates
. similar patterns of drawdown related to pumping of MW -4, MW -26, TW 4-4, TW 4-19
and TW4-20. Water levels and water level contours for the site have not changed
significantly since the last quarter, except for a few locations. As discussed in Section
4.1.1, pumping at TW 4-4, which began in the first quarter of 2010, has depressed the
water table near TW4-4, but a well-defined cone of depression is not yet evident, likely
due to variable permeability conditions near TW4-4 and the low water level at adjacent
well TW4-14.
A reported decrease in water level of approximately 4 feet occurred in well MW-20. The
water level changes at other wells, including pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4,
TW4-19, and TW4-20 were less than 1 foot.
Water level fluctuations at pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-
20 typically occur in part because of fluctuations in pumping conditions just prior to and
at the time the measurements are taken. Water levels reported at pumping wells this
quarter were, however, within 1 foot of their reported water levels last quarter.
4.1.3 Hydrographs
Attached under Tab E are hydro graphs showing groundwater elevation in each nitrate
contaminant investigation monitor well over time.
15
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation
Attached in Tab F are tables showing depth to groundwater measured and groundwater
elevation over time for each of the wells listed in Section 2.1.1 above.
4.2 Review of Analytical Results
4.2.1 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Included under Tab I of this Report are current nitrate and chloride iso-concentration
maps for the Mill site. Nitrate iso-contours start at 5 mg/L and chloride iso-contours start
at 100 mg/L because those values appear to separate the plumes from background. All
nitrate and chloride data used to develop these iso-concentration maps are from the
current quarter's sampling events.
4.2.2 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs
Attached under Tab J is a table summarizing values for nitrate and chloride for each well
over time. Some data (MW -18, MW -19 and the Frog Pond) were not sampled this period
but the historical data are included for information purposes.
Attached under Tab K are graphs showing nitrate and chloride concentration plots in each
monitor well over time.
4.2.3 Interpretation of Analytical Data
Generally, the shapes of the nitrate and chloride plumes appear to be stable and
unchanged for the last eleven quarters. The nitrate and chloride plumes maintain their
general geographic association and it is still possible to separate the plumes into a
segment northeast of the wildlife ponds and a southwest segment at the mill site. The
current quarter's data continue to support the conclusion in the Nitrate Contamination
Investigation Report that the nitrate and chloride at the Mill site are co-extensive and
appear to originally come from the same source.
Nitrate and chloride concentrations in samples from the downgradient edge of the plumes
(in the vicinity of tailings impoundment monitoring wells MW -30 and MW -31) have
remained essentially unchanged (current concentration within one standard deviation of
the average of the previous ten quarters and within laboratory variation) and the plume
does not appear to be migrating in the downgradient direction.
In general, nitrate concentrations in nitrate monitoring wells are similar to values from
last quarter or have declined (Table 2). Notable exceptions include nitrate concentrations
in samples from PIEZ-3, TWN-2, and TWN-5 where values exceed the values from last
quarter by 50% or more but all are less than values that have been previously measured
from those sampling locations. For example, the nitrate concentration measured in PIEZ-
3 of 0.2 mg/L is 100% higher than the 0.1 mg/L measured last quarter but lower than the
0.6 mg/L concentration that has previously been measured in samples from this
16
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
piezometer. Some chloride concentrations are up slightly from last quarter but, with two
exceptions, are within the range of previously measured concentrations. The measured
chloride concentration in TWN-16 of 50 mg/L is higher than the previous high of 39
mg/L (Table 3). However, the measured chloride concentration in PIEZ-3 of 53 mg/L is
lower than the previous high of 116 mg/L.
Note that samples from recently installed chloroform monitoring wells TW 4-26 and
TW4-27 had measured nitrate concentrations that are higher than 10 mg/L. However,
nitrate concentrations in these wells are clearly separated from the nitrate/chloride plume
at the Mill site by many wells that are below 10 mg/L or are nondetect for nitrate,
including but not limited to, TW4-23, MW-32 and TW4-16. Thus, nitrate in TW4-26 and
TW4-27 appears to be isolated from the plume at the Mill site, in the same way that the
relatively small nitrate plumes at TWN-09 and TWN-17 are isolated from the plume at
the Mill site.
5.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
Necessary corrective actions identified during the current monitoring period are described
below.
5.1 Identification and Definition of the Problem
Rinsate and DIFB Chloride Levels
Chloride is present in one rinsate blank and in the DIFB for this quarter. To address
previous nitrate contamination in the nitrate and chloroform sampling programs, an
additional rinse with 55-gallons of DI water has previously been added to the
decontamination process. EFR believes that the source for the chloride present in the
rinsate blanks this quarter appears to be related to the increasing volume ofDI water used
in the rinsate process due to the second 55-gallon rinse of the portable pump with DI
water. The chloride present in the rinsate blanks is present in the DI water and is not the
result of inadequate decontamination of the purging pump. The contamination in the DI
water is most likely the result of chlorination of the intake water (from the potable water
supply source) used for the DI system. At high volume use rates, the DI system appears
to be unable to remove all of the chloride introduced with the DI intake (supply) water.
5.2 Assignment of Responsibility for Investigation of the Problem
The problem has been investigated by the QA Manager.
5.3 Investigation and Determination of Cause of the Problem
Rinsate and DIFB Chloride Levels
As discussed above, chloride is entering the rinsate blanks from the chlorination of the
potable water supply used as a feed to the DI system. The DI system is showing signs of
breakthrough at times of high usage. To address the issue, the QA manager is working
17
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
with Mill staff evaluating the best approach to implement upgrades to the DI system to
ensure its ability to support the high volume ofDI water needed for the rinsate process
5.4 Determination of a Corrective Action to Eliminate the Problem
Rinsate and DIFB Chloride Levels
The contamination in the DI water is most likely the result of chlorination of the intake
water used for the DI system. Based on low level detections this quarter, the additional of
a second DI rinse in the process is "stressing" the system and causing chloroform
contamination. By upgrading the system, it will be able to support the high volume of DI
water being pumped through the system.
5.5 Assigning and Accepting Responsibility for Implementing the Corrective
Action
Rinsate and DIFB Chloride Levels
It will be the joint responsibility of the Director, Compliance and Permitting, and the
Mill's sampling staff to implement the changes and to assess the data to determine if it
has corrected the problems.
5.6 Implementing the Corrective Action and Evaluating Effectiveness
Rinsate and DIFB Chloride Levels
It is expected that chloride sources will be eliminated from the DIFBs after the DI system
is upgraded to support the high volume of DI water in the system during the rinsate
process. An appropriate DI system has been identified. Installation is scheduled to follow
construction of other capital improvements in the Mill in late 2012 or early 2013. Data
collected after the completion of the system upgrades will determine if any further action
is necessary to eliminate rinsate contamination.
5.7 Verifying That the Corrective Action Has Eliminated the Problem
Verification that chloride contamination has been eliminated will occur upon completion
of the system upgrades and receipt of at least the two quarters of data. If chloride
contamination persists then additional sources will be researched and the investigation
will continue. .
5.8 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions
Nitrate was present in the rinsate blanks during the first quarter 2012. To address
previous nitrate contamination in the nitrate and chloroform sampling programs, an
additional rinse with 55-gallons of DI water has been added to the decontamination
process. The nitrate contamination has been eliminated from rinsate blanks, however, the
addition of 55-gallons of DI water has resulted in chloride contamination in rinsates and
DIFBs. EFR is currently working to upgrade the DI system. An appropriate DI system
has been identified. Installation is scheduled to follow construction of other capital
improvements in the Mill in late 2012 or early 2013.
18
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
Verification that rinsate and DIFB contamination has been eliminated will occur upon
completion of the system upgrades and receipt of at least the two quarters of data. If
chloride contamination persists then additional sources will be researched and the
investigation will continue.
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Generally, the shapes of the nitrate and chloride plumes appear to be stable and
unchanged for the last eleven quarters. The nitrate and chloride plumes maintain their
general geographic association and it is still possible to separate the plumes into a
segment northeast of the wildlife ponds and a southwest segment at the mill site. The
current quarter's data continue to support the conclusion in the Nitrate Contamination
Investigation Report that the nitrate and chloride at the Mill site are co-extensive and
appear to originally come from the same source.
Nitrate and chloride concentrations in samples from the downgradient edge of the plumes
(in the vicinity of tailings impoundment monitoring wells MW-30 and MW-31) have
remained essentially unchanged (current concentration within one standard deviation of
the average of the previous ten quarters and within laboratory variation) and the plume
does not appear to be migrating in the downgradient direction.
The current quarter's data continue to support the conclusion in the Nitrate
Contamination Investigation Report that the nitrate and chloride at the Mill site are co-
extensive and appear to originally come from the same source.
7.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFR has provided to the Co-Executive Secretary an electronic copy of all laboratory
results for groundwater quality monitoring conducted under the nitrate contaminant
investigation during the Quarter, in Comma Separated Values ("CSV") format. A copy
of the transmittal e-mail is included under Tab L.
19
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. on August 29,2012.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
By:
Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and General Counsel
20
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\201Z QZ\201Z QZ Nitrate Report text.docx
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted.
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and
imprisonment for owing violations.
Davi Fry enlund
Senior Vice resident, Regulatory Affairs and General Counsel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
21
N:\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q2\2012 Q2 Nitrate Report text.docx
Tables
Table 1
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
"~; ,~~i ..
-",w,-'iF,C ,'l'
F 'j pf,
"
Y i!l,:;_il'~ WeU". pm -, Sample Colle~tiqnDtt~~ pate 9~ Lab_.:g~po~~i
Piezometer 01 4/20/2012
Piezometer 02 4120/2012
Piezometer 03 4/20/2012
TWN-01 4118/2012
TWN-02 4/20/2012
TWN-03 4/20/2012
TWN-04 4/18/2012
TWN-05 4118/2012
TWN-06 4118/2012
TWN-07 4120/2012
TWN-08 4118/2012
TWN-09 4/20/2012
TWN-10 4119/2012
TWN-11 4/19/2012
TWN-12 4118/2012
TWN-13 4118/2012
TWN-13R 4118/2012
TWN-14 4/20/2012
TWN-15 4/20/2012
TWN-15R 4119/2012
TWN-16 4/19/2012
TWN-17 4/20/2012
TWN-18 4119/2012
TWN-19 4119/2012
TWN-65 4/18/2012
TWN-60 4/20/2012
TWN-70 4/20/2012
Note: All wells were sampled for Nitrate and Chloride
TWN-60 is a DI Field Blank
TWN-65 is a duplicate of TWN-04, and TWN-70 is a duplicate ofTWN-15.
511/2012
5/1/2012
511/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
51112012
511/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
51112012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
5/1/2012
f(:~ ~~B J~~~ '~i'fi~~ k~,~:': . ,"1:, ·'~~!!t~' I~'::;i~ ,~, iw' II ~f' ~~r~ Ir,,·tlsf~~:.y ~",~~ '~. i;'~riy}i; ,?",~I1\.'1 A"; !~~ I'i;i~ ~I', I:~~~~~ ~l~~~~K.f:~ J;:~~~~"~;' [it I',:);",.!;, . ~;·;til*h·'
Piez 1 NA NA 7.2
Piez 2 NA NA 0.6
Piez 3 NA 1.7 1.6
TWN1 0.5 0.5 0.6
TWN2 20.8 62.1 69
TWN3 29 25.3 26
TWN4 004 0.9 1
TWN5 0.2 0.3 0.3
TWN6 104 1.5 104
TWN7 0.1 0.8 1.2
TWN8 0.1 <0.1 <0.1
TWN9 12 7.6 7.7
TWN10 104 1.5 1
TWN11 1.3 104 1.3
TWN12 0.5 0.7 0.8
TWN13 0.5 0.1 0.1
TWN14 304 2.9 2.9
TWN15 1.1 0.7 1
TWN16 1 1.2 1.3
TWN17 6.7 lOA 11
TWN18 1.3 1.6 1.8
TWN19 704 7.2 6.2
Red value indicates nondetect
\'
I~, .~;; .c·· ;'::;1f. I}{'~ ::~~" k~: ." ~~~, I.'''.,·N ,,~ \;~"'@
6.8 \
0.6
1.8
0.6
69
27
0.9
0.3
104
1.6
<0.1
10.7
0.2
104
0.7
0.2
3.5
1
2.6
8.9
1.8
7.2
Table 2
Nitrate (mg/L)
;~; ';< .. ',;,:" ;'. ),~.:: ' , ~~;:);
:. ~i''!r~:~};. ¥ F~:'i~ ~,.n.:'r;'i'"');' ::1 ~.20 tn .'~ '1;: ~;~~.~.~~:i~~; . ,'iff' "',f},,'" ."
6.5 7
0.2 0.3
1.8 1.8
0.6 0.5
48 43
24 24
1.0 0.9
0.3 004
1.2 1.1
1.0 1.3
<0.1 <0.1
8 9.5
1.3 0.3
104 104
0.7 4.2
004 1.6
4.2 3.7
1.2 104
2 4.6
8 8.6
1.6 104
7 7
;,;:~,:~');"~'/~~~'*'w .~~ ~~~~,~:~ '~, . :',,',' " '. ~'~~,;" ;f\~;'~f~'~~: 'i~: F.:: ,~:~:': .. , "':~ ~'\:;i :.;i!~~.~lf~~r:~~~~I:~~~ " . ~ ~/~ "ii::' -~': .;~' ~~ ~;' . 0 ~ '·'".2nd'\'Q·, '1~rQ}\:,#~91:~;: {~i~'S; 4t1l~Q,~1"O~:t !'2.nd ~'2012 '1 ,Q2'Ot!,:;and'2nd\!~;~, .;'~';&~'f'~,:;i;r :';\' .. ~ , ~ ..~,E'< :>.: " ;:~ ,.~~ ~,~~;.t.:.'. ~ ~~: :~f~~ :',~;,'~'lr,:29il:::;~~~;~~'i
6.8 7 6.6 7.1 6.6 -7
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 100
1.7 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.7 -6
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0
40 33 33 31 48.0 55
26 25 25 25 24.0 -4
0.9 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.1 22
0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 50
1.5 1.1 104 1.2 1.1 -8
1.7 0.7 2.2 2.3 1.2 -48
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0
10 11 10.9 12.2 10.6 -13
1.2 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.9 13
104 0.1 1.6 1.6 1.6 0
1 0.6 1.2 0.9 1.2 33
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0
3.5 3.5 3.9 3.5 304 -3
1.6 1.6 1.3 1.5 1.6 7
1.6 204 2.6 2.8 2.0 -29
9 8.5 8.1 8.7 9.1 5
1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.1 11
6.9 7.1 6.5 7 6.8 -3
Table 3
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H -1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Receipt Temperature Check
H-4 Analytical Method Check
H-5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H -6 QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H -7 Rinsate Check
H -8 QC Control Limits for Analyses and Blanks
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
MW-5
• perched monitoring well
TW4-12 o temporary perched monitoring well
TWN-10 <> temporary perched nitrate monitoring well
PIEZ-1
(Ii)
TW4-27
~
perched piezometer
temporary perched monitoring well
installed October, 2011
RUIN SPRING o seep or spring
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
WHITE MESA SITE PLAN
SHOWING LOCATIONS OF PERCHED
WELLS AND PIEZOMETERS
REFERENCE
H:1718000/may12/Uwelloc12.srf
FIGURE
A-1
TabB
Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Name
TWN-13
TWN-S
TWN-1
TWN-lO
TWN-4
TWN-12
lWN-6
TWN-15
TWN-ll
TWN·18
TWN-7
TWN-16
TWN-14
TWN-19
TWN-l7
TWN-9
TWN-3
TWN-2
Piez 1
Piez 2
Piez3
~
·Tu.)~ ~
Twlv 7f:>
TwJIJ 60
Nitrate
Mg/l
Previous
Nitrate Samples
Qrt. Date/Purge sample
NO
NO
0.2
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.6
1.9
2.3
2.8
3.5
7
8.1
12.2
25.0
31.0
7.1
0.1
1.8
NO
~"lg'I;l O,Ig
4-UZ ·I~ Ogo'l
c.-l-l&-\:;). 0'1"\5"
1-\-1 ~ .... ~ \O~:::t
4~ III -1;Z f3~~
-i-i«" i:{ i~
1.o\-tX-\:l '~~"i
""\A~-~ 1'1~\
~'~:lO -12 0 (;2.'1
Lj -Itt-P· Ol'S"S
t.\-\Q-12 O~l.\.'S
~\-A)-l" Ob'10
Lt "l'\-I':l, loot
'-i -.2.D-y., O~SC
!.o\ .-\a..\~ \~~
'-\-).0 .• t~ 0'=-54
Li-::to ~ 12-07D3
L.\-:lC-l:l ()jI5
'-i-J..c-\:l.. o72.r,
~-.2o-P, i'~f,
~ -)..(> -\'J-\:l.JS
4·-')j) ~ I)" 12.;;l)
l..\/IB{ I~ l;2SS
L.\ / .2. 0/12. 0 (;;),.1
t..t /20/ 12... ) 3")0
Nitrate Order
2nd Quarter 2012
Depth Total Depth
46-05 120
61.67 145.5
GA.~ 150
~sj '70 112.5
~i ex) 105
'"10.70 12S.7
"1.S(,t..l> 110
is..:l.5 130
Gj.;l.I" 155
bGjA~ 142
":11 .70 145
'i".bO 105
l.-t7.f<0 100
b2.qs 135
s.:l.i.{h 110
3Li· ~~ 110
b'3.~ 97
-:>3.4,S 96
:2.! :7t 96
f>\ .'0>
2.;';t3c
1.\0 .\0
"
\
Rinsate Samples
Name Date Sample
TWN-13R y .,g ~I~ (>6'-'10
TWN-8R
TWN-SR
TWN-IR
TWN-10R
TWN·4R
TWN-12R
TWN-6R
lWN-15R Li/l~ I I:?. o<>:>!>
TWN-llR
TWN-l8R
TWN·7R
TWN-16R
TWN-14R
TWN·19R
TWN-9R
TWN·3R
TWN-2R
:3 i,.SJ..
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r~:lsoJ)1~J ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
,~~I:~, FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 :z.. t\Ji Q'""~r=t=c::'" AJ , fro..+< ;LO ,~
Location (well name)~L-_P_l_~_L._-_0_1 _______ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: 14tAr'll"l:(" t}blh();;::~fT'}}
Date and Time for Purgin~'-\ 12..01~1~
Well Purging Equip Used:[QJpump o@ bailer
pH Buffer 7.0 7,0
Specific Conductanc~L-_4_q....:q ___ --I1 IlMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ G:, \ • gs
Conductance (avg)
and Sampling (if different) .... 1 _;v._~_~ _______ ---,
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L-I "v._~_~~ _____ ---I
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I Pi Gz.~ 0'3
pH Buffer 4.0 4,0
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1-1 D ____ --'
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~O~_-fI(.653h)
3" Well:. l5 . (.367h)
8,50
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 ) S.S""1 Redox Potential (Eh)L-1 :2.04_--'-_--1 TurbiditYI-I Y~''-'''O,---_--,
Weather Condo l ___ c. __ --=:....-_____ ---' _ ~V\.f)n't Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)IL-_)_g_o_---I
Time I l~03 Gal. Purged L-I _0 __ --1 Time Gal. Purged L-I ___ --'
Conductance Conductance
Temp.oC J5.,£7 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~ 0 ~ Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I ___ --I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged L-I ___ ---' Time Gal. Purged L-I ___ --I
Conductance pH ..... I ___ --' Conductance pH L-I ___ ......I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) IL--___ ..... Redox Potential Eh (mV) L-I ___ --'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged .... 1 __ 1:) ____ ..... gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 0 T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) ..... 1 0 ___ ----'
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1-1 D ___ ---J
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~ ..... #I_~A _______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample (indicate if other
y N than as specified y N Type y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients 'tJ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 tJ
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) 'fJ D Sample volume D 19 D
Ghlor~~(. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
~ ("r~..Je:~ on f> rTe. ~1 )')..5"1. ~n(\tl
~p\es b~jea OV'"IJ. GOll~d-d 0;}
rAnd.. {jq"rr-:n r,.,e~e~:t--o c.ol1ed-..saM[> 1G.S.
l~O:S.. w~+er w~ Gleo..r.
Piez-01 04-20-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
!9
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
\----------------, t OENISONI)~~1 ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
'j MINES ..-.-...J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 2nD< Q"",o.14er Nffr~ ~112
Location (well name)~I....-P_le_~_-_O_;;;" ________ ---,
Sampler Name
and initials: ~(lf\er 'HDI L'a~/fH
Date and Time for Purgin~ j 72.0/~012..
Well Purging Equip Used:[QJpump or(![] bailer
pH Buffer 7.0 7 .0
Specific Conductanc~l.........;q....:..4 _"1 ___ --,1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~:?2;2:.'3C>
Conductance (avg) £770.3
and Sampling (if different) 1 ...... /0_0_11-________ -'
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I ...... M_VA _______ ......I
l-rvJJV-02 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L... _________ --I
pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): ...... 1 _0 ___ ----'
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" W ell:~----"D"'--_-II (.653h)
3" Well:, 0 ,(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 15,54 Redox Potential (Eh)1 '174 TurbiditylL.,.J1L-.' '~----I
Weather cond'l I..... _S_v.._""_-l'_'-ff ________ ---' Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1.....1 1.1-7_° __ -,
Time 1 \~'3:5 Gal. Purged r...lb ___ ---I Time Gal. Purged .... 1 ___ ---'
Conductance 1 b7 6.3 Conductance pH 1-1 __ ----'
Temp.oC 115. SCi Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) , q lY Redox Potential Eh (m V) ,'---__ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 \. b Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged 1.....' ___ ---' Time Gal. Purged 11....-___ -'
Conductance pH 1,,--___ ......1 Conductance pH ,'---__ ---I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) r...1 ___ ---I Redox Potential Eh (mV) ..... 1 ___ --'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged 1-1 _D ____ ...... gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1 0 T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1-1 _0 ___ ......
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1-1 0 ___ --.1
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~I-_~_~_~ ______ ---I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs D D 3x40 m!
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml
Heavy Metals D D 250m!
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250m!
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml
Other (specify) "fJ D Sample volume
Ghlo(';~< .
Comment
Y N
D D
D 1:1
D D
D D
D D
D 1:1
Type y
HCL D
H2SO4 ~
HN03 D
No Presel-v. D
HN03 D
D
If preservati ve is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
n See instruction 6r£~
A(('\\)<::~ on S~-t~ a;...f' \;t~. ~f\(\~( I"l\~ &0..(",1(1 'Pr6.sc r't"Y +0 LcH-e,d-SQYYJpJe,S_
:''''l'V]fl \cs. Were.. bo-:l-c~ 0..1-1~5 ~~(' wa.s. deo.,. L e..-fT s ~~ ",--t-l:::t"3g
Piez-0204-20-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
~
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r--------------!OENISONI).4~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ~ See instruction
MINI:S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 2... n IJ. Q"'C\r"fcr-)\J \~frtA.te .:l-OI':2.
Location (well name )fL-_?_,_e._1.._-_0_3 ________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 =-j" Anne., Ho)] /j~7f)j
Date and Time for Purging q/:J-.'C> 7 ~o lr.:L
Well Purging Equip Used:11[] pump 000 bailer
Sampling Event 1 Q"'A("fec-~ )\)l::t('o,.;h:.
pH Buffer 7.0 7.6
Specific Conductanc~~4_q ...... 9 ___ __'1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgina 9 0 . 1 0
Conductance (avg)
and Sampling (if different) ~/--1 L--_~ ______ ---'
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L-I ~_YA-______ ---,
I P~e:z-02.. Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-_________ .........
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): ,--I _0 ___ ----'
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~_OO:--_---iI(.653h)
3" Well:. D J367h)
J~.11
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1}5 I L}l Redox Potential (Eh)1 177 Turbidityla.....;5~.~ __ ----'
Weather cond'l L-__ S_\.A._t'\_n_il _______ --'
Time I ' ~ UI 8' I Gal. Purged IL--_O __ ----'
Conductance
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 177
Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged L-I ___ ---'
Conductance pH 1'--___ --'
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I ___ ---'
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event}L-11_7_o __ ----'
Time Gal. Purged 1-1 ___ ---'
Conductance pH L..-1 __ ----'
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) IL..--__ ---'
Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged L-I ___ ----'
Conductance pH 10..-___ --'
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) L-I ___ ---'
Turbidity (NTU)
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1'--_____ --' gallon{s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 0 T=2V/Q= I D I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0 L..-.. ___ .....I
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0 L..-.. ___ .....I
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LaijL._~_~ _______ ....J
Sample Taken Sample Vol Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample (indicate if other
y N than as specified y N Type y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients 1:l D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) E D Sample volume D ~ D ~
C~\Dr~l( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
A ff i ~eJ. on ~ tt~ .. ..1 \::l 41. -r;.r1Tler' o.r1d. 6-", fr ,." p re-!,.(1) J. 1-0 GO JI e.d-.5 P"M r le..s,
.::, iN"'I\ f) eS GO' \ eel-~~ ()J'l a bOo. :1 e,k "'+ \~E.O , vJo-.-tc:r Wo..-> c..1 e.w'. L-e.-+t $'~C. "')-JAS J
Piez-0304-20-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill .. Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
.-... _----_ .. ------_._,
i OENISONr;)~~1 ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
J_~INES _~ FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I · N~rq....fe. 2"l5\ Q",o.("1--e(' '2P)::L
Location (well name )~L....-_'T...;:....;;v.:l-.;...N_-_0_, _______ ---1
Sampler Name
and initials: l==t"o..7'lner bt611,'JtA.t,)TH-
Date and Time for Purgin~ '1IJ<£/~ol~ and Sampling (if different) ...... 1 ~_~_'fo _______ ----I
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 Cr.,.v.Y" J:rD..s
Sampling Event IQv.CAf+erl~ j\) :}(""+~ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event l--(vJ"v-OS
pH Buffer 7.0 7,0 pH Buffer 4.0 Lf.D
Specific ConductanceL-1 _ti\~'f_q ___ -JI ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 11:2..SD
Depth to Water Before Purgina .s 1.70 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ~~ .70 1(·653h)
3" Well: 6 (.367h) 1.....-___ ......
Conductance (avg) ~D3 pH of Water (avg) 7.Sf>
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \5.0\ Redox Potential (Eh)r...;;;I..2-:.,:16 ___ --' TurbiditY~I.;2.:..-..:..7 __ .......I
Weather Condo
Time ...... 11_0 ~---£.~ _---I Gal. Purged ...... 1 _fP.. __ ---'
Conductance 1 st 03 pHI 7.S S
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ;z;2.'2..
Turbidity (NTU)
Time ;.-1 ....... '_0.....;;..3_1_---'
Conductance I ~ 03
Gal. Purged 1L.....---'7:.....g __ ......
pH I 7,SC-
Temp.oC I lS.o)
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;;... 17
Turbidity (NTU) I ';L7.~
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)L-1 ...... 10_b __ --'
Time 1030 Gal. Purged ...... 1 ~~ __ .......I
Conductance I ~OS
Temp.oC I 1~,0D
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ...... ?)5.D ___ --'
Turbidity (NTU) I :2lSP
Time 1103 -:z.. Gal. Purged I ...... q...;..;}:.....-__ ......
Conductance ...... 1 ~=O_'-\"-_"",, pH 1,.51:,
Temp.oC 1 is.DI
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ...... 1 _~_I_L __ ......
Turbidity (NTU)
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ...... 1 _"....:...:..1 ___ -' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I \3
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I G. I D I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) () "-------'
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated D 1...-_---'
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~ ...... ~_i._~ ______ ----J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
. Nutrients 151 D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) "tJ D Sample volume D ,B D ~
Ch \O('~~(. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
TWN-0104-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r·-----·----------·-·---·-----I I OENISONI)~~ ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
~ See instruction
lL~]NI:S -.J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 2. n J\ QU(A,..-t'er AJ ,':fr",,1'" ~ 12-0 \:to
Sampler Name
Location (well name)iL...-nN_l __ N_-_C_":l. ________ ---1 and initials: l~f"I1)e'-lJo\\)Jt~7Ti1-
Date and Time for PurginS L.lIl~/:;.ol~
Well Purging Equip Used:OO pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event I Q~CAr+(/'e N i "h"o..-\-~
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductancel'---_4 _1_Cj __ ---'1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before PurginS ;;L) • ~6
Conductance (avg) :l)D~ '---------~
and Sampling (if different) I \.17:;"0/ ::2..D12...
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Gr'\Arl$C)~
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event II\IJJJ-03
pH Buffer 4.0 q.o
Well Depth(O.Olft): I qb.c>O
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 '-18.77 IC.653h)
3" Well:. 0 . (.367h)
pH of Water (avg) ~,7g '--~~~-------~
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1'5, SJ Redox Potential (Eh)1 'i~'i Turbidityl ~1"L~
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)L...1 _1_&_° __ ....
Time L-11_9_47 __ ...... Gal. Purged 1L-7_~ __ .....I Time 1 I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 1306 CO pH 1 (0,78 Conductance I I pH I 1
Temp.oC I I'S.5 l Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I qsy Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I a:4.~ Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time Gal. Purged L...I ___ ---' Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance pH ...... 1 ___ --I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1'--___ ...... Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged ..... 1 -.:..7_:2 ___ ---' gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I \~ T = 2V/Q = I g., ~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I [.q 1
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L.._N._~_~ ______ ---,
Sample Taken Sample Vol Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample (indicate if other
y N than as specified y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 rn
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
c..,~1 or J' J-( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
Aa;"ea. On ~;+'" ",i-''-'~/. '''MeA 6..t\J. G-"",{,'" pres..""q J.;,r p"'r~e . P"r~~ b~",.,
)L1l.\ \. ? \Ai":j-ec\ well .ror ().. -+o+tA.\ of' '=-""i(\v:1t·S. t\kr~e~ W~" a.(~'. ?v\'I"~e el1J.c:j, 41-
\4\.\1_ \0fA.1-(r W6...5:. L'<.o..("". l~.A Site> o. . ..} )t..\Sb
Af(,:\J~A. on ~;i-e 0...1-Ol;2..0,--Tl\nn-er t?J\~ CrIA(('1'1'I pr~~t)~ +0 L,olleG1-.s~Mp)t:,$..
Ot:P~ {v\".:l<A+-e.r W~~ .;7..1.JD. So\Mpl-Gs-1o(;\.~1-c:c1 t}..~ D7~5 .. Le.~ ~)T<. a.T ()1d-.7
TWN-0204-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
rOEN,s~~I)~.41 ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
i MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ;1.f\tJ\ Qv..tM .. ter 6J1 /\.);:o}(""'-+< !L.Dl~
Location (well name )~,-_T'_w_N_ .... _O_3 ________ ---,
Sampler Name
and initials: --r;.",,-er OQ 0 l\ j J\~~/'T'H"
Date and Time for Purgina Y/lq /;2.01a... and Sampling (if different) I '-17 ;1...0/':;"01 ~
Well Purging Equip Used:[f[] pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prey. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I '-_'1i_W_W_-_D_q _____ ----'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductanc~,-_~-,-q-,-,q,---__ ---,I !lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 'J ",DO
Depth to Water Before Purgina ~. 8S 4" well:1 41.::Z::S 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L..-___ ....J
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I . 'Y.gj Redox Potential (Eh)1 3QS Turbidity ..... 1 J...;;;.O...;;;.O __ ~
Weather cond'l ..... _&_lo_v-_J..;;...t _______ ---I
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) 1-1 '_S_l' __ -....J
Time 1 lq 15 Gal. Purged 1,---5_1 __ ~ Time Gal. Purged 1'--___ .....
Conductance l:t ~ '>'1 Conductance
Temp. °c 1 lq. $3 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 5 q 5 Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ___ --I
Turbidity (NTU) \00 Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time Gal. Purged 1-1 ___ -....J Time Gal. Purged 1-1 ___ -....J
Conductance pH ..... I ___ --' Conductance pH ..... I ___ --'
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I'--___ ....J Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1'---__ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1-1 _5_7 ___ --'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = IL...-.._):;l __ ~
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 b,g7 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 1.'3>3
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~I-_;v_0~ _____ ~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs D D 3x40 m1 D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ D a
Ghlor)'dG If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
Af"r;v~~ 00('\ ~;-}'C dt.~ l"-leE, -r""Y'n~r-~t\J. G-",-r,.;"l ?f'esenf +or P""':je.. rv..i"<\e. b~~r1
? v..("~e~ vV~n .rof" 0.. +o-t~\ or 11 fVliYlU\i-~ aI.(1~ L1 S 5e.C6vuls. P\Af"~d well J.f'~1.
Pw'~-G e..(H~ec\ a...t \'1 \~. v..)~~1 'h0\~ (J-. L'rtl"G ~;~LD\O(". LeB-SItu ",T It.Jl!
A-rr:\)~ on ~I'+~ 0.+ 0"710 I II).(\rJif tiVla (;-Q.. ('" '11'1'\ pr<:sen+ ~ to c.o l1evt 5.ti\Mple.s. l:)~pt\ to
wIAter v1o..~ 3~# bS s.~f>l~~ \Nd<:., c.o\1ec.t<::d 0.1' 071S. L<.,.f}-SJt~ o.-} O,t1
TWN-0304-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
.-----------Jl oENlsoNI)~~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINI:S _ FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ::z.. nO. Gv.-o..r"'-er}J /f r A=t<... 2-D l~
Sampler Name
Location (well name )~,--__ -r_W_N_-_O_'-\ ______ --I and initials: I-r;nn-er H6111cJ~jln:F
Date and Time for Purgin8 L\/, ~ / ~ J~
Well Purging Equip Used:[![] pump o@ bailer
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific ConductanceL-1 _"I;....;.ti ...... , __ --II ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgina 4 Q,/'D
Conductance (avg) 'D~
and Sampling (if different) ,--I N._71T ________ ......
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I &-rlN"la:fo~
Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1L-"1\N __ JV_-_1b _____ -----'
pH Buffer 4.0 y,O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 1~S)·7D
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 $.:50 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L...-__ ---I
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 14. q2. Redox Potential (Eh)1 .:l. 3:::' TurbiditYL-1 _11...;;;8'---_--1
Weather Condo IL-._B_CA_~_' t-=--_G_' o_v..._~---.:i~ __ --I
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event}L-11_7_D __ ......
Time ha..>L Gal. Purged 1....1 _1_0.....:,L1 _-----I Time I \~3 Gal. Purged L-I --Il\~7 __ ......
Conductance I 10 '!> ~ Conductance
Temp.oC 1 ) L\. '11 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I A'SLO Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~SCf
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I lOb
Time I l~S'i Gal. Purged 1....1 .....;.l_~_O_-----I Time 1\2SS Gal. Purged ...... 1 l:.......Li~~ __ --I
Conductance 1 lO,>Y pH I 7.;;Q Conductance (0"'5'-1
Temp. °C 1 14 .~li Temp.oC I ''1/13
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I .:2..33 Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ;t3:l:
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) II *'
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged ,'----:.\ L.\-=3 __ ---' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 13 T=2V/Q= I ~.'S3 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0 '-----_ ......
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated () '-----_ ......
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~,-.;...~_/._;A. ______ ---I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ D
~hlc(";j( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
Am'''ej 0(1 .sIt", At 1.2YD. -r;,Mer ,..".1. &",r,:" p('e~ef'l} -R,r p"'r~" ... ".1 .s"""pJ,t! eueY!+
R .. r~c bc~"'n ",1" I:tLJ"i, ? ~e~ ~ell -For .... -h-\-",\ J; \\ ",,;nu.+CS. W,,-1-u-).,eJ. "'-SI~h-1
do: S£o)or +" ,-I. 'Pu.r~c €fI~e~ Mil. ~M?k.s c-D\la-h::d ttS US'S. L-e:&) Si+t= "'}-13M)
TWN-0404-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
~
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
[--------------------1
I OENlsoNI)J~1 ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Iv MINI:S . =:J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 2..,,;j Q v..o.r=t=d ;.J ,'.:.\'r"j"e 2D \2.
Sampler Name
Location (well name)fI-T~W_tJ_-_O_S ________ ___I and initials: ::fAnner +iO)\l'J(k~IrH-
Date and Time for Purgin~ Y / 1 ~ I $2..() J:L
Well Purging Equip Used:OO pump o@ bailer
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductanc~l.__q_'_4.1...1~'___ __ ---I1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ bi1 ,90
Conductance (avg) 3C>bJ
and Sampling (if different) 1L-,v.~:1._;4 _______ ____1
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event II._-._l _~_;-J_-_O_~ _____ __'
pH Buffer 4.0 '-\.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I } Sb,OO
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 ~. ~ IC.653h)
3" Well:. 1) .(.367h)
/.0'1
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lLiA \ Redox Potential (Eh)1 7:J?';).... TurbiditYI._I 3_1 0 __ ---'
WeatherCond. L-1 __ B_O'_Mi_~~_G_\_o~_'tJ __ ____'
Time I D,\4~
Conductance I 3 0 bl
Temp.oC
Gal. Purged lL--l _E __ ---'
pH !7,()4
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 _'3_3_1 __ --'
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 o1l4t..t Gal. Purged 1 L-...;..10---'-y_----'
Conductance pH 1 7.0b
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 _3_1.....:~:.....-_--1
Turbidity (NTU) 3,D
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)!L--~';""Z> __ --1
Time ! 0'\., 3 Gal. Purged 1'--....:.4 ___ 1 __ --'
Conductance I :30b-;t pH I 7.005
Temp.oC 114.Q\
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 :s:t __ S __ __,
Turbidity (NTU) 1 3.0
Time I O"YS Gal. Purged 1._1 ___ "_7 __ ---'
Conductance 1 ~OG. 1 pH 1 "7,6$
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 '3_15 __ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) '3.0
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged lL--l:.-l.....::1 ___ .......
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = ,--I ----::;;\3"--_--'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I g,o~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0 '-----_.....I
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1-1 _1> ___ .....1
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L-_,/I/_I._I9-______ ----I
Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients rn 0 100ml 0 ~ H2SO4 rB
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) III 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
C'n\o~J~ }<.. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
An-; \led. 0", oS ,.te ~ 1-O'l3C> • -s;: fl ()er An). G-o. rf','" ?rdoG11 r ,£""r pv-rje ....... J. S", ""'f'l'J
-e.--l (:",,1. ? \A~~ b~() ",t 6 "13 c.. P ",r ~d. j,Jc! \ ~.... '" .}cst-", 1 0+' q yv';".4-e..5.
wc;,,\-e .... ~()b dew. P .... (~G Ghae~ 6<(l~ ~q,yllpl.:.> l.ollec1eJ ..... t C'14..S
L~ ~\-t< d\-T Oq£o '
TWN-0504-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
rEI
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
[------------------1
[OENISONi).4.4
ATTACHlVIENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
I MINE~_ ............... I FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I .2. n J\ Q,,",~r+e.(' j\.h t1"'-~e. A o,~
Sampler Name
and initials: 1-rd>.1'\r\cr I"J 6 1]. JO\~IT J.1-Location (well name )~I-_~_~ W_N_-_O_k"---______ ----'
Date and Time for Purgina L\/1 gl~l~ and Sampling (if different) 1-1 _#._:14 ________ .....
Well Purging Equip Used:[IDpump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I G-Tw"\;;tf~.s
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I-_l'_v.l_IJV_-_1_Q. _____ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance ...... 1 _dj_Cf ~-"--__ ----,I [lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I ':3 O.co
Depth to Water Before Purgina 15.~ Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 3S,75 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h)
'--------'
Conductance (avg) 1-1_'5:>_\..:_'0 _____ --' pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \ L\. q2, I Redox Potential (Eh)1 t).S2 Turbidity 1-.1 1.;...-6-:.../_1 _----'
Weather Condo I 'PO\H-)('j clb",di Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)I,--]~_6 __ ....I
Time I \ y,..g Gal. Purged I s;r: Time 11 '1420'1 Gal. Purged 11-.~ ___ --I
Conductance I tf>'-1D Conductance 1533 pH 1 7 .1.5
Temp.oC Temp.oC 14 ~q I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 :::t.l;; I Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 !l5Y
Turbidity (NTU) 10 .. 3 Turbidity (NTU) 1 to.':[
Time I lq~D Gal. Purged 1-.1 _7...;;;g~_--I Time 119 51 Gal. Purged ...... 1 ..... 1+-1 __ ~
Conductance ...... 1 \_b_9_1_----' pHI 7.JLj Conductance 1 '593 pH I'.IL}
Temp.oC Temp.oC I \9.Q4
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-.1 zt_'-i_Gj __ ....I Redox Potential Eh (mV) L...I ~_9....;;..g_----,
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) \0-0
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged ...... 1 _.....:.q ....... / ___ ....J gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I \~ T=2V/Q= I 5.50 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0 L..-___ ....J
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated b L..-___ ....J
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~ ..... _M_/;..;...~ ______ ---,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 129 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 J9 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) BJ 0 Sample volume 0 ID 0 19
6h\br~~C If preservati ve is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
A-rf;\le~
everr\-.
~-ter
on .s,l\-e "'+ I~.?D. 'lMl'leI" MA G-... rr 1'1 Fl"eSG"+ +> plA(S~ GV7..i Sq",,?/)
P W" ~ <:. b'Zj a." "" + 1'-12 Y , P \A.r~ ed well ~r 0... -io-fp,/ OP 7 /'V\ } ~ iT'-c.s,
v.-XA.S cleo.f', PW'<!e Cf'\d.eJ "'t'\~ 5lW'IpJ.a Ll>\kcteJ Ikt-1'-131.
Depth tl> ~<A.1-if u.)a,.s o3~51 ~~ .s,+c ~1-}z...J]£
TWN-0604-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r---··-·-------·----! !OENISON')~~1 ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
.~~_......J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: ! ;;2.T"IA Gv..o.r+er'" N ,-:trO\.-r(; :2-0\2..
Location (well name)~ ..... ~..;...W_N_-_O_l ________ ____'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 10. (H1t..r ijo111d~~ /T'1f'
Date and Time for PurginB L1! 14/.;LOI?. and Sampling (if different) 1 q/2...oj .2.o~i£
Well Purging Equip Used:[![] pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 G-rlAY'cAl~s
Sampling Event !Q'--\(A\""fer 1.::\ ;V 'fro-+<:. Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I TwN-\6'
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 D.O
Specific Conductance ..... 1 _q_~.....::'1~ __ ---,1 !!MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I iO~·OO
Depth to Water Before PurginB g~.l~ 4" well:1 \ \,02: 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '------~
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 l'1 .. J~ Redox Potential (Eh)! 3 O~ Turbidity 1 g .0
Weather Condo 1 ___ ' _________ ---1 _ 60\Ad'/j Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)l ...... b_o __ ----I
Time 1 04 J~ Gal. Purged ...... 1 _, ~ __ ----' Time Gal. Purged 1-1 ___ ---'
Conductance I J 1 b3 Conductance pH 1...-1 __ ---'
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 301 Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ___ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) B.O Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged I'---___ ~ Time Gal. Purged 11.....-__ ----1
Conductance pH ...... I ___ ....I Conductance pH I-I ___ .....I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ___ ----' Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ...... ___ --1
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged II.--_'~"':"'-__ ----I gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I \2. T=2V/Q= I l.g3 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I L/'J..
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L./'J._,/A _______ ---J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Type y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients i:1 0 100ml 0 ~ H2SO4 l!1 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 ' No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 111 0 1:1
Gh'O\""~aL If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
TWN-0704-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
[o:~~~ijjj i ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
I. MINtS .. FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: l ;l ,,6\ Qv..b..<+e(" .N\+rG-.1< ;J..O 102.
Sampler Name
and initials: I ""-~n(\er aon4iJ~~tnt Location (well name)~,-_--rvJ_N_-_O_g ________ ----.I
Date and Time for PurginB u.J Ig/~D'~ and Sampling (if different) ,-I ~_/4. ________ --,
Well Purging Equip Used:r![] pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ~v.f)~S
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I '-_'T_W_N_-_l_~ _____ ---,
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 Li.O
Specific Conductanc~,---....;..1_q..;,..q ___ ....... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I \:::tD, 00 · 1 1<;5,.50
Depth to Water Before Purging b I. (;1 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:I S'-l.JI.} 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '-------'
Conductance (avg) ,-I _;2.:3 __ '_~ _____ --I pH of Water (avg) 1.b6
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 14 . £~ Redox Potential (Eh)lL..-L..ll,"",3~_.....I Turbidity ''-=:3...:..;:0=--_-.....1
WeatherCond. I ?D\,A"~ G10w).~ Exfl Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event),-I _7_0 __ -.....1
Time Gal. Purged' 7 ~ Time ID 80 7 Gal. Purged lL-q..L.l.-J __ --I
Conductance I ::2.. ~ 4 ~ Conductance , ;2..35g
Temp.oC Temp.oC I lq.5~
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ,-I ...;..1_19....:....-_---' Redox Potential Eh (m V) 11....:-11_° __ -.....1
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time 'O~og Gal. Purged ..... 1 ...:..10"-4-'--_--' Time I '-O_g_D_'1 __ --' Gal. Purged ..... 1 ..:...11;....:;7 __ --'
Conductance 1 2.':) b Co( pH I 7,1:,0 Conductance LZ.37'-1 pH 17.5"
Temp.oC I 14. S7 Temp. °C 1 I Lt.; 7
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ,-I ..;...\....;..1.,;..3 __ --' Redox Potential Eh (m V) ,-I _Jl_S __ --'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) 3.0
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged 1,---...:...\ _11"""--__ ----'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1...-1 -...:.1;::_; __ ......1
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = 1 g. 4.2 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1-1 _D ___ .......
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated b 1.--___ ......1
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L-·_M_:l._f'} _______ --,
Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 "'g] 0
Ghlo('~d( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
~ See instruction
A,d-vea 00 ~*e q (Y1S'3 --rtJi.nY\ec O\"J &fJ\('r;" presef7t' -Gr furj€. AnJ ..s0\/Yl?]/~ 'evenT.
fv.r~e be~OItl 0\-1 68l>o . ?v..r~t!!d ~e.1l ~r ~ +0+1).1 o-r '1 minv\+Gs . \..JO\.+~r wo..s cJ~a.r.
Pv..,..~e. e:(\J.~~ (AnA SD\fV\p\e.;. wet"o(. (..on~J~J. 0..1 Ogoq, Le:~ sH-<. ~ 0813
TWN-0804-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
--l9
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged L-I ---:l3"'-.b ___ ---I
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = ...... 1 --:,1_:z __ --I
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 13.:11 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 11. '1
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~ ...... _M_Y:_I1 ______ ----,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D I!I H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ D .eg
[..h\Of'~e If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
AH' ;~e~ 0(\ s~tc:.. tA.+ 13~Y. \~n1'\c.r 6,."A &(l-T(;" p('e~ef\\-.foy ,?",(~E!.. ?v..rtc-b ej~)'\ P.. t )3:2.7
tJv.f"~-eJ. v.)e.1\ ~o("' (to,. 4-*~\ 6-\ 3 m~(\""t-e>. ?v..('~e~ we'\ ~-(~'. wo....+Gr "'-Jo.5. )N'I()~-t~ c.Jar.
f",r~~ Ul~~~ ~ 133D. LeP-sl:h::. ",1-' 13~~
Arr:"e.J.. 01'\ &,'t-c. ~} ObSq. -(OI.nner Ana (;,CJ.rrJ'y\ p"..ac.n1-in c.oIlGV+ ..so.t1IJple!::o. D-c!~ 1-0 t.vq.-Jt.y"
wo.s. b3, 05 S~Y"'\?1es lNere. bO\;lea o..-} 07 03. L~ ~~~ C\.-t' 07DS
TWN-0904-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
jl o~~~.-~~~~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
,_~INES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ;l n J Q v.. 0.. f"tc:.t' N'~ ro.. +'<:.. aJ) l ':L
Sampler Name
and initials: I ""-;nY'et'" t/~lI:J~/-n+ Location (well name)~L-_~_w_tJ_-_l_D ________ --,
Date and Time for Purgin~ L..\ / I gl;)...O)~ and Sampling (if different) I LJ/lq 7a.o/~
Well Purging Equip Used:[]TIpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Grv,ntI+b..s
Sampling Event I Qv..lA..(OfGr}v., .N ~(J' <. Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ...... <'N_1 __ JJ_-_O_l _____ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific ConductancelL--_Dl;....:.qq..o.....-__ ...... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 105,00
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ gO. g~ 1 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:I 1.5./~ i(·653h)
3" Well: b (.367h) L--___ ....J
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) ..... 1 _~_ .. b_:O _____ ----I
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \S. ~(, Redox Potential (Eh)1 Ll q ~ Turbidityl i5.7
Weather Condo I ?o-.rd-I 'b C1o'-l.J. ~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ..... 1 _1.5_· __ ........
Time 1 l.2D ~ Gal. Purged ..... 13_2: __ ---' Gal. Purged L-I ___ ---'
Conductance I ~C.b9 pH I q, ()O Conductance
Temp.oC 1 '\1;. be Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 L\G\ '6 Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ,sg-~") I 1
Turbidity (NTU) l iS.7 Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged IL--___ ....J Time , 1 Gal. Purged IL--___ ....J
Conductance pH 11.--__ ----1
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I ___ ---' Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 C001
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged 1-1 _~ ____ ---'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L-I _l~~ __ -----I
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 1 .?.\y~ 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1-1 3_:t. __ ----'
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L-_pJ_I_~ ______ ----I
Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) y N Type Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients 1:1 D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250 ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) E D Sample volume D ~ D ~
C.'h\o\~clc. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
TWN-10 04-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
,----------------IOENISOJ)j.4
ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ;l. ha Q"'CArtcr N 14ro-,=tc::. d..Ol~
Location (well name)~,--T_W_!V_-_l_l ________ --,
Sampler Name
and initials: -r0\(\ (lei H 0 Illj~ R~
Date and Time for Purging L1!1 q J ~6' q and Sampling (if different) Il-tv_IA ________ .....I
Well Purging Equip Used:l~ Ipump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event I &v..~(fer-b .N ,+rCA.te Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I-_-r'_\JJ_N_-_lS ______ --I
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 q.D
Specific Conductanc~l-_q:""~"""' ___ --I1 IlMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 111..lX.OC
Depth to Water Before Purging Gl1 1 93 4" well:147 .. 3g 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '----_.....I
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) 1-1 _~_-::7_~_D _____ --I pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I J 4.57 Redox Potential (Eh) I :3>1.)"3 TurbiditylL-::l-_, Cf=---_--I
Weather Condo
Time I {J 7 5=< Gal. Purged 1-1 _gY~_---I
Conductance 1 Q..7gb
Temp.oC 1 14.S9
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 3q7
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 07l5t..J
Conductance 1 :2.7g0
Gal. Purged 1 ..... _10.....;8'---_---'
pH 1 7·64
Temp.oC IY.5b
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 "3,43
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)I-' _5_2$ __ ---,
Time 075.,'3 Gal. Purged ,L.-Gf_"' __ ----'
Conductance '27 gD pH I "1,0.5
Temp.oC 11Q·57
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 _~_q....;.q __ .....1
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 07~ Gal. Purged L-11:..-:;.L) ___ .....I
Conductance 1 2180 pH 1 7,D'-1
Temp.oC 1 1~.S7
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 13;;;-.Y_O __ ---'
Turbidity (NTU)
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ..... 1 _12._0 ___ ---'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1..-1 ---.;1~:;2... __ ------,
gallon(s}
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 17.~1 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 ..... _° ___ .....1
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated IL--D ___ .....I
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L-M_fa-_______ -I
Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients "EI D 100ml D "E1 H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D !J D
Gh'O\~a< If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
An'·;"\le6. 0/'\ ~n-e. 0\.1' D13~ -r~nner ~y\~ &t..\f,..;n f('~()-3-..f~r 'P~r~~ ~ .s.o.MF1:~ E\JeniJ
fv.C~e.. b~o.n "';-0145" ?v..r~d w~.ll ,pot""" "'-1-01--",1 6~ 1D Y"l)·nv..+~. W~er l.No..s <:1<:4r.
PUf"~~ efltAdt MJ s.o..fYlpl~ Gonede~ td--0755 . .De?t~ -h VJJer ~ "3,1../<::'
Lt:-W ~~i-o ~tl-07 5~
TWN-1104-19-2013 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
ltl
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I-------------~
iOEN,SOJ)JJ I ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
~ ___ ' ........ ft!'I!'!!!-FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 ;LYl ci G \A(},.rte.(" 2.D'~ /J l'fr~'f"<
Location (well name)i ...... ~~-_W_!0_-_,_Q.. _______ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 ~}'l(JC:(" H 0 llJA~l1'lt
Date and Time for Purgin8 '1/1 '6/ .').0)'2... and Sampling (if different) ,---~_/...;.A:::"-______ ----I
Well Purging Equip Used:[!!] pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 (,-( u.('IClI~~.s
Sampling Event I QJ:",(+<Yb ;V'T ( ... :r" Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I -rV->N-D'-1
pH Buffer 7.0 -"D
Specific Conductanc~ ...... ----,C1'--!.qq..£...-__ ---,1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin8 a-.~ ~ 56
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 L\:O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 \)0.00
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" Well:~(.653h)
3" Well:~(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I ) "1. %4 Redox Potential (Eh) ...... 1 ....:..ltf.:...;O'---_ ...... Turbidity ...... l l_5_7 __ .....1
Weather Condo Exfl Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ...... 1 _'1_t> __ ---'
Time 1134 \ Gal. Purged ...... 1 .-.,;q ..;,...J __ .....I Time 1 \~'1;;>" Gal. Purged ...... 1 ..;....\_O'i-'--_.....I
Conductance 1 2.. t.\ ~ ~ pH 17,3 , Conductance 1 2. L\ 15
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ...... 1 _~_B_Z_--, Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 18~
Turbidity (NTU) 1 \50 Turbidity (NTU) I lCS5
Time 1 \'£\:\:5 Gal. Purged ...... 1 .....;1L.;.J...L,7_---I Time I \:)\4 9 Gal. Purged ...... 1 ...;..:13:;...;0:::..-_---'
Conductance 1 ,;L.q (;5 pH 1 7.~ Conductance I ,;z. q IN pH 1 / . 3:Z
Temp.oC I lQ. 'in Temp. °C ,,4. ~ 1 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1L--1'1.....;1 __ .....1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) ...... 1 _J9_5 __ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) 11b..5
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged 1L....-\_3e ____ .....1 gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
\-:)0
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60= I ~ T=2V/Q= I g~l~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0 '"-----_ .....
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated t). L....-___ .......
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L.-;""~_~:"';'~ ______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients ~ D 100ml D ~ H2SO4 :@
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) 11:] D Sample volume D 'K1 D
0h1o'~~c.. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
A~(:>le.~ 01'\ ~1+<:..:1 l33D, ~,,~er tN\~ Vo.rr;" f<'"e.setd-.ror 'P"'~~<: Mel. .s"vVlfl~ event
Pw~e Ioef}"'/\"'~ 1~34. ?v..c-~...I. \>Xli f'or f)... ·h-ro.\ of ll> ,...,,',,I>.-t'e.:;.. ",\'len ,?vJ~G .st",,..fc;4
~o\.f(;(" v.)~ o('().o('\ttJ~ b",--1" s1ov.)b c..)-GCM"'G~ ~ro~h O\A..1-The ?v.r~c. f'~\~-e, enJea qt1~
Sd\M~\~s, Gol1 ~(,1-Ga CA.-1-l~YY. Lc.H >{t<: 11\.-1 1 ~y 8.
o -Gp~ ~o ~ CA-1e.r W lA,~ 8 ~. q J
TWN-1204-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
[J
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I OENISONI)~~ I-··--···-···--·-·--------·-~--ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
; MINES _. FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 2. n Ii Q""o.(01"e(" N t~r~tG :l..C> 1~
Sampler Name
and initials: -J~flner }-}o}J,'Ja..~/TH-Location (well name)~ ..... -r_w_N_-_l.J ________ __I
Date and Time for Purging Y I J g 7 ~o 1 ~
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump o@ bailer
Sampling Event I Q\J\lArt-cr8 /'oJ I"+r£i\t.-e
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D
Specific ConductanceL..1 _~_q_4.L..-__ ---I1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgina 4 b.Os.
Conductance (avg)
and Sampling (if different) ..-v/A
~--------~
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I~T_vJ_JJ_-_l_3_R _____ --I
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): '4S. Sl)
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:i bl\.tlQ iC.653h)
3" Well:L-. _o __ .....1.(.367h)
g.oo
Well Water Temp. (avg) I I L\ ."1~ Redox Potential (Eh)1 1 S3 Turbidity I 1 0.'5
Weather cond'l L-__ P_fA_r_}_)-=~_G_\_O\A._J..f~ _ ____I1
Time 0,1.£ Gal. Purged L..I _10_4 __ ---1
Conductance ~77.1
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) L..I _1 C:;_(J __ ~
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I ',\7
Conductance I ~ bO
Temp.oC
I Ib,2
Gal. Purged I \ 3 C>
pHI g.OI
Redox Potential Eh (mV) L..ll_5_1:....-_---I
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater /
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)L-1 .....;b;....6 __ ......1
Time L-I O_J;...:..l...;;.'_---' Gal. Purged 1L-..:....;11.....:;7 __ ......I
Conductance 873.::<.
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ..... .;....} 5..;;..5=-_--'
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 ..... 0_/-.:' g'=----_ ...... Gal. Purged ..... 1 -=-1l{3-=-_---'
Conductance I ~.sg .1 pH I g.OI
Temp.oC 1 1q.~
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L..I \:......4_9 __ ---1
Turbidity (NTU)
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged L-I .-.,;1~Y.;:;;3 ___ ----J
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1.-1 ---=13=---_----1
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 1 q ,qq I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) .... 1_0 ___ .....
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1-1 _'0 ___ --1
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LaijL.._/\.I._'/..;.;A~ _____ ----J
Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D f:I H2SO4 I!l D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ D CII
Gh)or;A1" If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
TWN-1304-18-2013 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r---------·---------·, ATTACHMENT 1 I OENISONI)~~!1 WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
~ See instruction
! MINIES ! FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
D;;cription of Sampli~~ Event: 1 ~Y\6\ G\).o.r1-e.r N,'trCA.1"G 201~
Sampler Name
Location (well name)~I-T_vJ_N_-_).3--.:.R~ ______ ----I and initials: l-ro..nnt!r Holl/'J~/1H
Date and Time for Purgina '4/,g/~o\~
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event 1 Qv.~r+c:,r~ N i'ff"O\te.
pH Buffer 7.0 1'---,--'-,0 ___ --'
Specific ConductanceI-I _q....;...j.L..4..1.--__ ---I1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before PurginSL-_o ___ ....I
Conductance (avg) 0.0...
and Sampling (if different) A//A '-------------'
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1L-G-_t"_I..A_",_Jf_o_.s ____ --'
Pre v . Well Sampled in Sampling Event I,--/'J._~_'A _______ ---,
pH Buffer 4.0 ,-\.0
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~_o __ --1I(.653h)
3" Well:_ 0 J367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \5.4.3 Redox Potential (Eh)1-1 4_~_I __ ---, Turbidity II-0 ___ ---'
Weather Condo I 0 .\
. 1 o-<"-t'~ G \ ow) ~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)I ..... .5_() __ ---'
Time 1 6~3g Gal. Purged '--Il:....;;;g;.....-O_----I Time Gal. Purged 1-1 ___ ---'
Conductance ().~ Conductance pH ,--I __ ----I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) II.-LJ_"_l _---' Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ___ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged 1-1 ___ -....I Time Gal. Purged 1-1 ___ -....I
Conductance pH ..... I ___ --' Conductance pHL-I ___ ......
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) .... 1 ___ ---' Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1'--___ ....1
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged .... 1 _:;..._0_0 ___ ......
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L..-1 -.;.1=-3 __ ----'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 0 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0 '----_ ......
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0 '-----_......I
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L-_M_'/._A _______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) y N
VOCs -0 0 3x40 mI 0 0
Nutrients "E1 0 100mI 0 'El
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0
Other (specify) 1;] 0 Sample volume 0 19
L-h' ol~cle
Comment
Ar(,,~\le.d on ~\-+~ (";"'1-0'-\0. 'R"1\$~-t~ be~~" 0..1--06\5 . 'Pv.tVlpeJ.
~D &tI\\\o~ So",,? \Norrer ",.,a lO() 6-Al1bn~ of' t::>I' ~cA+~r. R
'
n.s(1.+e.
~o.Mrles tNere, c.ol1ec+eJ 6..1-0640. Left ~ite. ~+ Ob'15.
TWN-13R 04-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Type y
HCL 0
H2SO4 l:l
HN03 0
No Preserv. 0
HN03 0
0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
~ See instruction
SD &0.\1 onoS nGJd. Wo.to-
ended. o..l1~
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
i ---·--·-··----·----------1 I OENISONI)~~i ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
~!!!~S I FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 ;2..nA Q\N).r+-a-N\*(o-..+~ .::2-O1~
Sampler Name
Location (well name )i ..... TW __ N_-...-l;....I1 _________ --' and initials: 1 ~)1t1~1 Eo1\;JA~Jii.}
Date and Time for PurginB '-\/1~/:;..ol~
Well Purging Equip Used:[~pump o@ bailer
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance ..... 1 ~-=-q_q ____ ..... 1 !!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before PurginB a:. SS I
Conductance (avg) 10;1.1
and Sampling (if different) 1 q/20Aw1~
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I&("v..t\~s
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I..-nJ __ N_ .... _14 ______ .....J
pH Buffer 4.0 11,Q
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 \3>5. ()~
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 '47.30 1(·653h)
3" Well: b (.367h) L...-___ .....J
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \ S· \~ Redox Potential (Eh) 1..-1 _1_8g~_-I Turbidityl112. :3
Weather Condo IL....-_C_'_owl_~ _______ ---I
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) 1.-1 ~,,_b __ ......
Time 110q:[ Gal. Purged .... 1 .s~~ __ ...... Time Gal. Purged ..... 1 ___ --'
Conductance \O~J Conductance pH ..... 1 __ ----'
Temp. DC Temp. DC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1.-1 _1 ~_g __ --J Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ___ -.....J
Turbidity (NTU) 19;):/3 Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged 1..-1 ___ -.....J Time Gal. Purged 1-1 ___ -.....J
Conductance pH 11.-___ .......1 Conductance pH I.-I ___ .......I
Temp. DC Temp. DC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ___ -----' Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ..... ___ -.....J
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged 1-1 _S_1 ___ ----' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1 \~ T=2V/Q= 17.8& I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I '·~o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L..:~-..:...!1/J,--______ ......J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Type y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients 'ij:I D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 111 D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) l!l D Sample volume D KI D ~
Gh\O\;Je: If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
~ See instruction
TWN-1404-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r--------------, i OENISON~~~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
1 MI ~ __ ...=J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 ~ nJ. Q\MJ\f+ex-NI'trO\.+e ~I~
Location (well name )~L-~_W_tJ_-_15 ________ ----,
Sampler Name
and initials: I ::r;nn~THol1I4~r
Date and Time for PurginB '-1!JQ / .a.0l~ and Sampling (if different) 1 YjMli..o 1':<.
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 16-rlAnJtbs
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-II'N __ AJ_-_)_&_~ _____ .....
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific ConductanceL-1 _'"1.;...,1'1...:..~ ___ ---II ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): L-I _lS_!:> ___ ...J
Depth to Water Before Purgina ~,60S 4" well:1 4D.11 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) I.-___ ....J
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 1t! ,8:2.. Redox Potential (Eh)1 3 blJ Turbidity 1 ;;4';)....'
Weather Condo L-1 __ cJ_o_V._J_i ______ ---' Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)IL-5_o __ ....J
Time 1 0 bSGj Gal. Purged 1 "12 L--7=~"""---....J Time Gal. Purged L-I ___ ----I
Conductance I \ Sbg pH I /f~7 Conductance pH 1...-1 __ ----'
Temp.oC 1 \9.'5X Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 3(;'" Redox Potential Eh (mV) L-I ___ ----I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 p:t. C; Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged IL--___ -' Time Gal. Purged 11..... ___ ---'
Conductance pH ...... I ___ --' Conductance pH 1L--__ --oJ
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1.....1 ___ -.....l Redox Potential Eh (m V) IL-___ ....J
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 .... _7_;}... ____ ..... gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 12.. T = 2V/Q = I 4:,,7<6 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I 1,7.(,
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L-_Al_/4 _______ --I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients 1!J D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) "tJ D Sample volume D ~ D tJ
Ghlor;J( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
~ See instruction
Arri\leA 0\'\ 5)t-", ... --t 06'lt;, \""O\Ilnel" 0VlJ. &"'(T;t\ pre.sen+--fOr F~e, R.r~<::: ~"'n £lit b653
P \A'-~....). "",,11 for "--h + '" \ of' (. f'Vl i >'l ""T6So . P v.r~;e~ w~1\ o\r.:j ~ p ",,"~G <!"deJ '" t 0 bS~
\Nt\.+er V:>~ MO.5.~ G1~o..c: Le.-P+ ~l~ ~.j-070Y. '
Arr;\j~~ C)(\ ~;+G 6..-1' OG:2.3. T~"niftAncA &A.rr:/\ p'fv~d\+~ c.ol1e c1--SCVvJp}GS. D~p+h +0 w~-rr.~
IN~ O12..1b_ ;)l1\.Mplt:'~ were-lo~,\leJ. 0..+ Ob:2.7, LcF-SJ~+e ~~Ob30
TWN-1504-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r---------·---,
iOENISOJ).4.41 ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
L-.~~_---.J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 12."'c) Q""o.rl"~r N \~ro.,te .;2..01:<,
Sampler Name
Location (well name )~I..-_l _w_AJ_-_1 S_R~ ______ -....J and initials: I"'-"'J'lner HoI1J'J"'~rrH
Date and Time for Purgina l.\ll~ / :2.01~
Well Purging Equip Used:[1[] pump o@ bailer
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific ConductanceI-I _~.;...q...:.' ___ --,I !lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purginal..-__ C> __ --'
Conductance (avg) o·b
and Sampling (if different) 1..-1 ~~/..;...;.A-_______ ---,
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I G;-V\nJ.fo.S
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I..-_'_W_N_-_O_.b _____ --'
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): o
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~-O-----fI(.653h)
3" Well:. () . (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) Redox Potential (Eh)1-1 _3_""" __ ---' Turbidity ,-I -=::0:..-_---'
Weather Condo l ____ -=' _________ -....J _ G\bV.~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) ..... 1 _5_1> __ ---'
Time I O'3~ Gal. Purged lL-l:...;~;....O __ ~ Time Gal. Purged 1-1 ___ ---I
Conductance 0.5 pH I ~\53 Conductance pH &.-1 __ ---'
Temp.oC \1.54 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1-13--..;;.b-={)'---_--' Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1'--___ ...... 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 Turbidity (NTU) 1 1
Time Gal. Purged ..... 1 ___ ---' Time Gal. Purged ..... 1 ___ ---'
Conductance pH ..... I ___ --' Conductance pH L-I ___ ~
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 11-___ ---1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ___ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 L-_~_()_D ___ -I
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = &..-1 _13 __ ---'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1"-0 ___ .......
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1L--l) ___ .....1
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LaijL-rl._'I_A _______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ffi 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) rl:I 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
~h\or~tk If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
.Afri~~d on ~:·h .. ..} Ob\~. R;I\Sli..·h b~M o...} ObIS. P-"""p"d. 50 G-... UOh,s at Ac:J W"'+~J
1:,0 &...1\on.l. s,oo.. t> \,:) ... .te. 0.(\ a 10 i) Cr ... Jl 0" s of' o.x. w..der. 1<.; I\.$IA..+-e. en Jed "'" a St.iM b
(,0 )l!:c+e~ 0--.+ Ob35. Le.+l-~'-~h~ ... ~+ Ob37 'P
TWN-15R 04-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
~E-N~S~NI).4 ~l ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
L MIN~S_~ FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ~n (J\ Q\J-.o,:rfct N a:clA,"t<. .2.01;2,.
Location (well name)~L-~ __ tJ_""-.!.l"';"' ________ ---I
Sampler Name
and initials: UY1}')Gt Ro)JJI(1.~IrJd-
Date and Time for Purgin~ 1171~ 7;2.01~
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump o@ bailer
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific ConductanceI-I _j...Lq"':"~.A--__ ---I1 IlMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging Q7. gD
Conductance (avg)
and Sampling (if different) JJ/A
~--------~
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I--r_\)J_N_ ... _O_1 _____ ......
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I \OO.OD
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 '34.og 1<·653h)
3" Well:L-. _0 __ ----1. (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) l )1t .qb Redox Potential (Eh)l :soq Turbidity I ..... 2_, y __ --'
Weathercond'l I-_G_'_o_\,}..._A_1 _______ ____
Time Gal. Purged 1 ..... _'1_g __ --'
Conductance pH I 7.J....1
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ~,g
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I~I t>_O_D __ -, Gal. Purged 1-1 7_~ ___ -,
Conductance
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 _~_A'f __ .----
Turbidity (NTU) 2.\5
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) 1 ..... 7_) __ --'
Time I O'fb1
Conductance I J ~5~
Temp.oC 1 lY.1 0
Gal. Purged L-I _b_O __ --'
pH I 7,J..)
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 '3D~
Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1-11;.....0_0_' __ .....1
Conductance 1 ,898
Temp.oC
Gal. Purged 1-1 _8_'"4 __ .----
pH 17,21
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1.2._q"' __ ---I
Turbidity (NTU)
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged IL.--";:;~""':Y ___ ......I gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = ,--I -....:.1.;t.. ___ ....... T=2V/Q= I s.bi I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) () '----_ ........
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0 1--___ .....1
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L-/'J---..;.~_~ ______ ---,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients ttl 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250m! 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) ra 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
Ch)orJ'a"( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
A(f"l\l~a 00 ~I~c:. q..-!, oqso -ro..rtlle(' fArI~ &~rr~'.n pr~~nt -tor r)\"tje q.(Jo\
S(/.f11f \~ e\Jen-1. P\l\'~e.. bv~O\('\ O'o~ O'1SLl. P",rfleA vJel1 +01'" "" -h:rt~\ o~ 7 M/~\A+~S,
'" o..h( w <>.5. C 1 "'....... P 1.\.( ~'" "'''' J,~ (}..YI,). ~f"IpJ~ Co J) eG +d ,,:1-100 I. D "P~/' +(J Wa. fer
WlA.S. Lil\,~L\. Le.,f} $,1-G ~t IDOL1.
TWN-1604-l9-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
JXI
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
!-------------···----I I ()EN,soNl)j~1 ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
L ,MI"!.~____ FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I:;... YI a Q\A~A~r AJA'",,,,,fG :1.. Ol::l.
Location (well name )il-_-r_vJ_tJ_ ... ..:....17=----_______ -----1
Sampler Name
and initials: l~nt'lG{" HolLJD-j~
Date and Time for Purgin8 gI1~7.20'o... and Sampling (if different) 1-1 ~_1_1~_Q7_!J,._o_1-::t _____ -,
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 &(,l.\.'f\JJ~s
Sampling Event 1 Q""o..r:t~r b N it rod: ~ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-1_-r_W_N_-_'_' _____ -'
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific ConductanceI-I _4-=-q_~=----__ --,1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 11 C> .00
Depth to Water Before Purgina ~ 3 . 'f D 4" well:1 LlGJ.G,'J 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h)
'------'
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) 11~S pH of Water (avg) 7.'1J
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 1 S.O'i Redox Potential (Eh)L-,1 "3_6_D __ ---I Turbidity I 77, I
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)lL...,;l_ll> __ ----'
Time 112f:,LJ Gal. Purged L-I 7~g __ ...... Time Gal. Purged 1-1 ___ --'
Conductance I \) 3:S pH 1 7.q7 Conductance pH 1..-1 __ -----I
Temp.oC 1 )5.04 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ~<OO Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I ___ --'
Turbidity (NTU) 1 77.1 Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged IL--___ ..... Time Gal. Purged IL--__ ---'
Conductance pH IL--__ ---' Conductance pH 1-.1 ___ --'
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ___ ---I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ___ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
V olume of Water Purged L-I __ ,.<...;g=-_----'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L-I _'_~ __ ----I
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I 2S .. ,'2.~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 )_S~
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 173
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L...M_~_:Ar _______ -J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs D D 3x40 m! D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 .. ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250m! D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250m! D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) m D Sample volume D g D ~
Ch\o,\~J< If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
~ See instruction
Auive! 0>" $'+" (Ai-1:J.4'1 -r'Mn~r GV1~ G-""rj.., r-r<:l"Ylt -1=0 ... p"''Zr P"'(Ji" b,(!",n tifT
1;2.'-18, P",,.~{.<\. ""e.1I +Dr f1.-i-.. '\-..J ".f' " M;",j-~ d\t'\a 30 St::~YlJ.s. P\A.r~Gd ~I\ J.r.j 1
P ,,-r~ et\J. ... ). ... t' 1:2.l)L-l, ~ ~~ if h .. ).....s \ ~~ J. ',Sc.O\br . L ~ S ,te G.-\-1::1..S&
Af'("i\Je).. 01\ ~,\t-~ 1\.1-OG>53\ -r;:Y\1'\U ~f\~ (ro-..Y'(l'r. p,es~Y\t +0 C611<..c..t .5iAM p/f!,5. O~pth +l>
v.:>o..1-Gl" w~ "3'-1. &' S , ~~~f>les welG boq·1~ol 0\,+ OhS".. Left s.jtG o..-r 0 (;, 5~
TWN-1704-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r----------------.. ·--I
I OENISONr;,~~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
L-!t'~~S I FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I :L 1"11\ Q '-\()., .... +er IV ;J"r;J~ :J-C> 1 ~
Sampler Name
Location (well name)~ ..... -r...:.-W_N_-...;,.18=--________ --I and initials: I :::Y;ntl~r +b1J;dAj/T-H
Date and Time for Purgina L)/ 1~/:;",ol:1
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump or[QJ bailer
Sampling Event I Qv.o..rterh A);t,«<.
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D
Specific ConductancelL..-..1Q....L.1..L,.Q ___ --II ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgina S -, #i25
Conductance (avg) ..... 1 .:;;;:2.=..:..I~b.3=--_____ --I
and Sampling (if different) .... I .M_VA ________ ......
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I ~\At'lJfb..s
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... 1_-rft.J __ /J_-_,_l _____ -"""'"
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I 145.00
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 51·00 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '----_ ......
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 14.3'-1 Redox Potential (Eh) ..... I -s_:>_GJ_--, Turbidity ..... 1 q_tt.L--_--'
Weather Condo ..... 1_0 __ 'o_u_d---'o:i'J-I---______ ---'
Time Gal. Purged ..... 1 _q_~ __ ......
Conductance 1 ;2..1 ~ 4
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 .... '5_45=---_---'
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I o~YL.} Gal. Purged 1 ..... 1_2:_0 __ ......
Conductance I :l\ 65 pH I 7.1&
Temp.oC 1 1u.'55
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 3=:5C;
Turbidity (NTU) 1411. GO
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'J Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)IL-.-'6_o __ ....I
Time Gal. Purged ...... 1 _10_& __ ......
Conductance 12 \ b':i
Temp.oC 114/"55
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 3 43
Turbidity (NTU)
Time I Og\.}~
Conductance 1 2.1 "7
Temp.oC
Gal. Purged I ...... J_3_:t __ ......
pHl 7.lg
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 335
Turbidity (NTU)
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged 1-1 ...... }-=~:;..O";-.;.... __ ----I gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1 ..... _':2... ___ --' T = 2V/Q = I ~. E>O I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I e
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~,-_'/v'_~_~ ______ ---,
Sample Taken Sample Vol Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample (indiCate if other
y N than as specified y N Type y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients r:J D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ll5J D Sample volume D 'f:] D ~
Gh\o,~J"( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
Arf':" ed. on s ,,+,,, "d-M,3D -r",nl'ler <O\J'ld 6-<..rr,''1 p ('«s.ent Ji,... Y"'[je~;J.A S Ql'>1p7(j e-Je-;1:
f V.ZF .b~ ... '\ 171. j 0 lS ':>'-1, P IA"~-e.<\ we 11 .f;,,.. ().. ht"l.l or II ,., i Ill.\.-re.s.. water
wo.> }'V'\~'\:!j C-\eA(". ?v..,~e. 'eY"I(1ea tkl\a SaMples Go neet~ ~+ o<&,y 5. LeJ.} s/'1-e q +-C8LJ1
D~J1-h +0 w~1-eI ~o.S 5'11/3
TWN-1804-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONr;,~~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
ifI MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: ,;t"a Qv.,o..rh:r A> ,:troJc ~Ol~
Sampler Name
Location (well name)~ ..... -r_W.....;j\J_-....:.lq..l..-________ ---I and initials: '--r~l'1n~r Ro }})'J~ /TH
Date and Time for Purgin~ Ll/IGl/.2.01';)..
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump or@] bailer
Sampling Event , Quu.r·tc:rlj Nitrod"<
pH Buffer 7.0 I.D
Specific Conductance ...... ' _~....:...q.....;q~ __ ---II [!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgina 52.. 4 ~
Conductance (avg)
and Sampling (if different) ..... , _,lV.....;yA~ _______ -..I
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 &rv.napo,S
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..... 1_-r_W_0J_-_}t..j _____ ~
pH Buffer 4.0 Y,D
Well Depth(O.Olft): ..... 1 _11_0_,0_0 __ ----'
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" Well:f3T.5Tl(.653h)
3" Well:~(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 115,4.5 Redox Potential (Eh)....::;L2;...;;.l..;..&.] __ ..... Turbidity I .... .;....) o_. ~ __ .....
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)lL-l.;...l_~ __ -..I
Time Gal. Purged IL--y...;;.,g __ -..J Time Gal. Purged ..... 1 '" ____ 0 __ ---'
Conductance Conductance I lq13
Temp.oC Temp.oC I 1~.3g
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I '-\'2-Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 _2_1_1 __ .....
Turbidity (NTU) 1 \O.S Turbidity (NTU) I lO.'
Time 1 \2.01 Gal. Purged ..... 1 _7~ ___ -..I Time 1 1.2D~ Gal. Purged ...... 18_Y ___ -..I
Conductance I lq~O Conductance pH I 7·4D
Temp.oC Temp.oC tS. bD
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 2.12. Redox Potential Eh (m V) I .2,)~
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) 10.7
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged L-I _~;;;;;"~"':"-___ ....I
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L-I ---I.-1~~_-----I
gallon(s}
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I G.~' I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) ..... 1 _0 ___ .....
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated L-I 0 ___ ----'
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L._.N._'/_~ ______ ---I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients rn 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) Q1 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
GhlD'f:d{ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
A((";v~~ 01) ~"t~ ~-r n SD ~nhcr GtY1&\ frArr//l pre.5en.r..for pV'(j~ AnJ ..,sq)l1p)'(j -evan-1:-
r "'(6"" ~'" 1'\ Ii\. t 11 S S . p",..-~ ""ell -t,;,.. ... .}o.} ~I .,..r 7 ,., j " ,,"+-e~ W.rr", ""'-S M D s·H J
(..\eo...('. fv."'~ e..t1a~~ IN'\~ ~p\e;. \,..>e,r< c.o\\~d~~ 0...-\ \2..~. Depth +6 v.)o..-t~(
wo..S \O~'\7 Le.++ ~i-te. ~-1 }2°C,.
TWN-1904-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
:----------------, iOENISONi)jjl
ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ~ See instruction
L M1NI:S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: , ;l n« Q",o.:r-h: .. -r Ah"+ro-.f4t. .2.0 1 ~
Sampler Name
Location (well name)~,----n_w_/J_-_~_b _______ ----, and initials: '~}'\()~Y-Hal J J'J~;j/171-
Date and Time for PurginB 11/2.0/;2.Dl~
Well Purging Equip Used:[gJpump o@ bailer
Sampling Event 'QvVA('fer~ "./\'X·h-""t<
pH Buffer 7.0 1-.'_7~.O ___ -..I
Specific Conductance .... ' _tl_GJ....;.1 ___ --" ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before PurginBI-_O ___ .....I
Conductance (avg) O.~
and Sampling (if different) ,A// A ~~~-------------.....I
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) .... , ~ __ ~....;I+:....-________ --,
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1-1 ,_"_\. ... _J _v ______________ .....1
pH Buffer 4.0 , Ll.D
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~--:() __ --fI(.653h)
3" Well:, I::> ,(.367h)
'Pi ~-z.-0'
Well Water Temp. (avg) 'I g.:L3 Redox Potential (Eh)',-~_'4_7 __ --, Turbidity ,'--0_"_'5 __ --'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) .... ' _.2._0_° __ .....1
Time '\32'1 Gal. Purged .... , _0 ___ .....1 Time Gal. Purged ,'---__ --..I
Conductance '0 I ~ pH ' 7.55 Conductance pH ,'--__ --'
Temp.oC 11&/23 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ~_9_7 __ .....I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 11--___ .....1
Turbidity (NTU) 10·5 Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged .... 1 ___ --' Time Gal. Purged .... 1 ___ --'
Conductance pH 1-.1 ___ --' Conductance pH 1-.1 ___ --'
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 11--___ .....1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) .... 1 ___ --'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged ..... 1 _0 ____ ......
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I 0
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0 '----_ ......
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0 '----_ ......
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~L-_/'J._Y:_'lt ______ ----,
Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Sample Taken Sample Vol Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample (indicate if other
y N than as specified y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
c.-h \ or J'de If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
TWN-60 04-20-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
1------·-·-----------, !j)ENISONr;)~~1 ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
J _ M~!'I£S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 ~ na QW>.r+e~ N(tro...tc .2.01~
Location (well name)i ..... -r_w_JO_-_Q; _________ --I
Sampler Name
and initials: 1"1' 1'-nne, }Jo 1I.JA.j /11J
Date and Time for Purgina '1/) g/ :;LDJ":l-,
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance ..... 1 _~..:..~.:....q':"'-__ ....II !!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ L\ 0 . 7 D
Conductance (avg) \o1:{3
and Sampling (if different) ..... 1 ~_~A ________ ....I
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 &r""Y'\Ji~.s
l -rvJN-/O Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..... _________ ....1
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I 1:2.5.70
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:I 55.3 0 1(.653h)
3" Well: 6 (.367h) '---___ ....I
Well Water Temp. (avg) I ll.\ .q.:t Redox Potential (Eh)1 ~32> TurbiditYI.-I ~11...:::.8 __ --,
Weather Condo Ext'/ Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)II.-_1_/7J
__ --'
Time Gal. Purged 1.-1 ___ --' Time Gal. Purged ..... 1 ___ ---'
Conductance pH 1.0-1 __ ----' Conductance pH 1.0-1 __ ----'
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) .... 1 ___ ---' Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ___ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged .... 1 ___ ---' Time Gal. Purged 1"--__ ---'
Conductance pH ..... 1 ___ --' Conductance pH ..... 1 ___ --'
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) IL--___ -I Redox Potential Eh (m V) .... 1 ___ ---'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged I ..... __ l~ ___ ---, gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I \3 T=2V/Q= 1 g.53 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) ..... 1 _0 ___ -,
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated ..... 1 0 ___ ---'
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~,-_/V.....;/;,-i9 _______ ---,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients "tI D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D 1!9 D ~
Ch\O(;~~ If preservati ve is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
TWN-6504-18-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
[~~~M"~N-~~s·.-i),~l, WHITEA~~~=~I~~ MILL
L....-_,_ -=, ..-J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Attachment 1
~ See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: ! ~ IAcA Q V c...f" t C,r .,AI, f'c~t Cd ~ Q I 2=
Location (well name)i T W.AI .... 70
Date and Time for Purging Y I \ q / /);0 I ~
Well Purging Equip Used:OO pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event ! Q UOJf"+P'r'V'I ./V'hi
pH Buffer 7.0 7./ C5
Specific Conductanc~ q q CJ !flMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging Q2, 65
Conductance (avg) J56S?
Sampler Name
and initials: GCNrt'~V\.J (Jev\~vr
and Sampling (if different) y / ~O I ~b 1 -;(.
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Pre v . Well Sampled in Sampling Event IT' \,J IV'..J I bR
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1
3" Well:
1.55
1..>/ 0.71IC.653h) 25 (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I J Y l 6~ I Redox Potential (Eh)1 369 Turbidity I "2 ;2.6 I
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)! _'5 f)
Time Gal. Purged 1...-1 ___ --' Time Gal. Purged I I...-___ ......I
Conductance pH ....... 1 __ ----' Conductance pH L-I __ ----I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1...-1 ___ --I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1...-1 ___ --I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged 1...-1 ___ --I Time Gal. Purged 1...-1 ___ ......I
Conductance pH I...-I ___ ......I Conductance pH L-1 ___ .....I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 11...-.. __ --' Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 I...-___ ......I
Turbidity (NTU) , Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged ..... 1 __ 7l..-sr.2::::!..-_---' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 1 ~ T=2V/Q= I 6,,7~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1.,7 1z 1
72-I If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy La~ ..... _ ..... ./V~/ ..... A'--'"-____ --,
Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Sample Taken Sample Vol Filtered Preservative Preservative Added Type of Sample (indicate if other
y N than as specified y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients Il1 0 100 ml 0 S H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 S 0 %l
6 k \or-\ cA6 If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
~ See instruction
TW/\/-15
TWN-70 04-19-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabC
Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Depth to Water Summary
TIME WELL
1019 MW-1
1024 MW-2
1359 MW-3
1400 MW-3A
1101 MW-5
1104 MW-11
1058 MW-12
1031 MW-14
1035 MW-15
1408 MW-17
915 MW-18
924 MW-19
1339 MW-20
1345 MW-22
1053 . MW-23
1050 MW-24
1048 MW-25
1035 MW-26
1040 MW-27
1050 MW-28
1036 MW-29
1038 MW-30
1036 MW-31
1042 MW-32
1104 MW-33
1044 MW-34
1055 MW-35
1047 MW-36
1039 MW-37
Static
level
64.66
109.70
83.20
85.26
106.45
88.15
108.63
103.88
106.60
74.66
70.28
52.08
88.93
67.10
114.27
114.34
73.78
68.16
51.00
76.59
102.01
75.90
68.00
74.80
DRY
108.40
112.50
110.60
108.45
NAME:
DATE:
TIME WELL
Static
Level
757 MW-4 71.04
800 TW4-1 64.92
812 TW4-2 66.85
823 TW4-3 50.20
841 TW4-4 70.00
826 TW4-5 56.78
814 TW4-6 69.98
849 TW4-7 67.86
817 TW4-8 66.50
823 TW4-9 54.75
803 TW4-1O 56.34
839 TW4-11 57.80
814 TW4-12 47.18
852 TW4-13 47.17
820 TW4-14 86.80
831 TW4-15 68.07
844 TW4-16 60.12
805 TW4-17 74.92
851 TW4-18 56.61
808 TW4-19 59.00
853 TW4-20 61.76
847 TW4-21 54.09
819 TW4-22 53.38
809 TW4-23 64.76
821 TW4-24 54.81
850 TW4-25 47.50
827 TW4-26 63.45
830 TW4-27 83.01
Tanner Holliday, Garrin Palmer
6/28/2012
TIME WELL
1418 PIEZ-1
1409 PIEZ-2
1411 PIEZ-3
1416 PIEZ-4
1413 PIEZ-5
1430 TWN-1
1442 TWN-2
1433 TWN-3
1457 TWN-4
1444 TWN-5
1437 TWN-6
1450 TWN-7
1454 TWN-8
1500 TWN-9
1459 TWN-lO
1516 TWN-11
1515 TWN-12
1503 TWN-13
1514 TWN-14
1519 TWN-15
1504 TWN-16
1507 TWN-17
1512 TWN-18
1509 TWN-19
Static
Level
61.52
21.28
40.29
47.80
42.80
51.57
21.02
32.83
41.03
69.55
74.62
88.39
61.64
62.90
80.82
69.41
28.50
46.02
62.43
92.00
47.85
33.87
58.40
52.50
We split up to complete depth checks so some times may be the same.
TIME WELL Static Level
NA DR-1 ABANDON
NA DR-2 ABANDON
1234 DR-5 83.2
1241 DR-6 94.37
1425 DR-7 92.18
1249 DR-8 51.05
1246 DR-9 86.69
1244 DR-10 78.05
1353 DR-11 98.35
1356 DR-12 88.55
1405 DR-13 70
1302 DR-14 76.55
1332 DR-15 93.05
NA DR-16 ABANDON
1305 DR-17 64.9
NA DR-18 ABANDON
1309 DR-19 63.3
1319.00 DR-20 55.3
1326 DR-21 107.38
1329 DR-22 Dry
1323 DR-23 70.77
1313 DR-24 43.95
NA DR-25 ABANDON
@ Estimated dry area
M:-5 perched monitoring well showing
5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-12 temporary perched monitoring well
0 5577 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-10 ~5586 temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing ~ 5594 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-27 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5525 installed October, 2011 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are pumping wells
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2012 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/aug121UwI0612_rev.srf C-l
TabD
Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
~ Estimated dry area
M.W'5 perched monitoring well showing
5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW4·12 . .
O temporary perched momtorlng well
5577 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN·10 A,5586 temporary perched nitrate monitoring
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ·1 perched piezometer showing
~ 5594 elevation in feet amsl
TW4·27 temporary perched monitoring well
*5525 installed October, 2011 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are pumping wells
KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2012 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/may12/UwI0312.srf D-l
TabE
Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
(J1
'" a
(J1 ....... a
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
(J1 o a
~ <.0 a
~ 00 a
~ -..J a
~ 0) a
~ (J1 a
1-----+----1----+-----+----+-----+-----+1 06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01122/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
'--__ --L ___ ...l..-__ ---l.. ___ ....J-___ .J...-__ ---l.. ___ -I-10/18/12
~ z • ~
~ r+ CD ..,
r-CD < CD
0 < CD ..,
=f
3
CD .-;=
C'"
3
"C ---
'" 0'1 a '" o a
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
0'1 a o a 0'1 a o a
I-------!--------!------I------+-------+-I 06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/1 4/11
04/01/12
L--____ ...I...-____ .....I.-____ --l-_____ ---!. ____ ----'-10/18/12
~ Z • N
~ r+ CD ..,
r-CD < CD
0 < CD ..,
::t
3
CD .-;=
C'"
3
"'C ---
.-.
C.
E
.c
= --Q)
E
i=
'-Q) > 0
Q) > Q)
...J
'-Q) .... ~
(II') • Z ~
G ~/9 ~/O ~ -,------.,------,------,----------,,------,
G~HOlvO
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/9G/GO
o ~/O ~/90
o ~/GGI ~O
60/90lLO
90/9 ~/G~
90/~0/90 +-----+------l-----l-------!----~
LO N ('I')
l ~/8 ~/O ~ -,...------.-----.-----,..----.-----....-----.-----..
l~HO/vO
~ ~/v~/60
.-
C.
E
.c = ~ ~/9l/l0 ---(1)
E
i=
s.. (1) > 0 o ~/O ~/80
(1) > (1)
...J
s.. (1) .... ~ O ~/llHO
oq-
I
Z ~
60/90/LO
80/8 ~/l ~
80/ ~0/90 -+------+-----l-----+----!-----+----+-----I
G ~/9 ~/O ~
,
G ~I ~OlvO ~
~ ~/v ~/60 .-. C.
E
.c = "-'
CI)
E ~ ~/9G/GO i=
~
CI) > 0
1\ ~ t> -
/ \
CI) > It
CI)
...I o ~/O ~/90
~ CI) .... ~
It)
I Z ~ o ~/GGHO
~~
~ ~ ~
\
60/90lLO
90/9 ~/G ~
Z ~/9 ~/O ~ -r-----..,..----r-----,.-----r-----r-------r----.,
Z~HOlvO
~ ~/v ~/60 .-. Q.
E
.c
= -(1)
E ~ ~/9Z/ZO i=
~ (1) > 0
(1) > (1)
...J o ~/O ~/90
~
(1) ..... ~
CO I Z ~ O~/ZZHO
60/90lLO
90/9 ~/Z ~ +----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+----1
Z ~/9 ~/O ~
Z~HO/vO
~ ~/v~/60 .-. C.
E
.c = ""-"
CI)
E ~ ~/9Z/Z0 i= ....
CI) > 0
CI) > CI)
..J o ~/O ~/90 ....
CI) ... s:
...... I Z ~ O ~/ZZHO
60/90/LO
90/9 ~/Z ~
~~
~
~~
\
\
(
\
t>
\ ..
~
o cO 0>
0> 01 o
~
~~
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
0> o o
01 ?1 o
01 o o
~ ~
"J:::.. 01 o
1 ~
~
~
+
•
~
~
~
~
0
"J:::.. o o
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/1 1
09/14/1 1
04/01/12
1 0118112
~ z • 00
~ r+ CD """I
r-CD < CD
0 < CD
"""I
=t
3 CD -~
C'"
3
"C "-"
.-... Q.
E
.c
= -Q)
E
i=
L. Q) > 0
Q) > Q)
...J
L.
Q) ...... ~
0)
I Z
~
Z ~/9 ~/O ~ -,-----r-----,-----r------r---...,.---_r-----....,
Z~HOlvO
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/9Z/ZO
o ~/O ~/90
O~/ZZHO
60/90lLO
90/9 ~/Z ~ +----+----+----+-----+----+----\----1
o
0> L(')
~ o co
o (") co
o .q: co
o Lri co
ex> c..v a
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
ex> I"V
(J'1
ex> I"V a
ex> ex>
~ ~
(J'1 a
ex> o
(J'1
I-------t-------!------+------t--------t-l 12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
L..-. ____ .J...-____ -I.-____ --I-____ --l. ____ ---'-10/18/12
~ Z I ~
0
~ r+ CD ..,
r-CD < CD
0 < CD ..,
::t
3
CD .-.. ;=
C'"
3
"C -
Z ~/g ~/O ~ --.------,-------.-------.------.--------.-----...
Z ~/~OlvO
.-. c.
E ~ ~/v ~/60 .c = ---CD E
i=
L. CD > 0 ~ ~/9Z/Z0
CD > CD ...J
L. CD ~ ~
~
~ I o ~/O ~/90 Z ~
o ~/ZZ/~O
60/90lLO -+--___ -+-___ -+-___ -l-___ ~-----+------l
LO
0> <.0
l ~/g ~/O ~
l~HOlvO
-c.
E
.c ~ ~/v ~/60
= ---CI)
E
i= .... CI) > 0 ~ ~/9lll0
CI) > CI)
...J .... CI) ..,
~
N
~ I o ~/O ~/9O Z ~
o ~/ll/~O
60/90lLO
o o o Lri
0
~~
\
\
~
~
~
~
o o -.;:t
Z ~/B ~/O ~
t
Z ~I ~OlvO 0
.-. c.
E
.c ~ ~/v~/60
;::
"'-"
~
\
CI)
E
i= ...
CI) > 0 ~ ~/9Z/Z0
CI) > CI)
...J ...
CI) ....,
~
M
"f""" I o ~/O ~/BO Z ~
o ~/ZZHO
~ v
" ~ v
< ~ ~ ~
60/90lLO
.-. c.
E
.c = ---CI)
E
i=
~ CI) > 0
CI) > CI)
...J
~ CI)
~ ~
~
"r""" I Z ~
Z ~/B ~/O ~ .,.-----...,-----....,.-----r------,-------,------,
Z~HOlvO
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/9Z/ZO
o ~/O ~/BO
o ~/ZZHO
60/90lLO +----+-----+------+-------+------1------1
o cr)
<0
N cr)
<0
l ~/g ~/O ~
l~HOlvO
.-. c.
E
.c ~ ~/v ~/60
= -CI)
E
i=
r-CI) > 0 ~ ~/9lll0
CI) > CI)
...J
r-CI) ... ~
It)
"'f""" I o ~/O ~/90 Z ~
o ~/ll/~O
60/90lLO
o o 00
C!
N 00
..
0
~~
~~
~
~
•
I ~~
~~
0
~
l ~/g ~/O ~
~~
l ~HO/vO V~
~ -Co
E
.c ~ ~/v~/60
= -CI)
E
i=
s-CI) > 0 ~ ~/9l/l0
CI) > CI)
...J
s-
CI) ..,
~
1\
1\ ~ [>
\
~
co
~ I o ~/O ~/90 Z ~
O~/llHO
~~
~ ~ ~ ~
60/90/LO
Z ~/B ~/O ~ ..------...,..------r-------,.------...------.,
Z~HOlvO
.-. Q.
E
.c ~ ~/v ~/60
= ---Cl)
E
j::
~ Cl) > 0 ~ ~/9Z/ZO
Cl) > Cl)
...J
~ Cl) ...,
~
r--
"f""" I o ~/O ~/BO Z ~
o ~/ZZHO
60/90lLO +-------l------+------+------+------l
.-. Q.
E
.c = ---CI)
E
i=
L. CI) > 0
CI) > CI)
...J
L.
CI) ...,
~
co
~ • Z ~
. Z ~/8 ~/O ~
Z~HO/vO
~ ~/v~/60
~ ~/9Z/Z0
o ~/O ~/80
o ~/ZZ/~O
60/901LO
o o
< ~
~
~
0
~
~~
0
~
~~
~~
~
V~
~
~ o CO
-c.
E
.Q
= -CI)
E
~
s...
CI) > 0
CI) > CI)
..J
s... CI) .... ~
0)
~ I Z ~
Z ~/g ~/O ~ -,------.-----.-----,..----,-----..,.----,-------,
Z~HOlvO
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/9Z/ZO
o ~/O ~/90
O~/ZZHO
60/90lLO +-----+---+----1-----+-----+----+-----1
o N lC)
lC)
N lC)
o
LO lC)
TabF
Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-l
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,646.96 5,648.09 1.13 112.5
5,600.38 02/06/09 47.71 46.58
5,599.99 07/21109 48.10 46.97
5,600.26 09/21109 47.83 46.70
5,601.10 10/28/09 46.99 45.86
5,602.59 12114/09 45.50 44.37
5,600.55 03111110 47.54 46.41
5,600.66 05111110 47.43 46.30
5,599.18 09/29110 48.91 47.78
5,598.92 12121110 49.17 48.04
5,598.29 02128111 49.80 48.67
5,597.80 06/21111 50.29 49.16
5,597.32 09/20111 50.77 49.64
5,597.15 12121111 50.94 49.81
5,596.54 03127112 51.55 50.42
5,596.52 06/28112 51.57 50.44
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-2
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,625.75 5,626.69 0.94 95
5,611.37 02106109 15.32 14.38
5,610.63 07121109 16.06 15.12
5,609.73 09121109 16.96 16.02
5,607.08 11/02109 19.61 18.67
5,606.57 12114/09 20.12 19.18
5,612.45 03111110 14.24 13.30
5,612.78 05111110 13.91 12.97
5,611.37 09129110 15.32 14.38
5,610.24 12121110 16.45 15.51
5,610.64 02128111 16.05 15.11
5,609.78 06121111 16.91 15.97
5609.79 09120111 16.90 15.96
5609.72 12121111 16.97 16.03
5,605.69 03/27112 21.00 20.06
5,605.67 06128112 21.02 20.08
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-3
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,633.64 5,634.50 0.86 110
5,603.77 02/06/09 30.73 29.87
5,602.37 07/21109 32.13 31.27
5,602.34 09/21109 32.16 31.30
5,602.60 10/28/09 31.90 31.04
5,603.12 12/14/09 31.38 30.52
5,602.90 03/11110 31.60 30.74
5,603.23 05/11110 31.27 30.41
5,602.86 09/29/10 31.64 30.78
5,603.35 12/21110 31.15 30.29
5,602.89 02/28/11 31.61 30.75
5,602.75 06/21111 31.75 30.89
5,602.40 09/20/11 32.10 31.24
5,602.40 12/21/11 32.10 31.24
5,601.70 03/27/12 32.80 31.94
5,601.67 06/28/12 32.83 31.97
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-4
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,641.04 5,641.87 0.83 136
5,601.47 02/06/09 40.40 39.57
5,604.26 07/21109 37.61 36.78
5,605.02 09/21109 36.85 36.02
5,605.87 10/28/09 36.00 35.17
5,605.81 12114/09 36.06 35.23
5,605.31 03111110 36.56 35.73
5,605.36 05/11110 36.51 35.68
5,604.59 09/29110 37.28 36.45
5,604.42 12/21110 37.45 36.62
5,603.69 02/28111 38.18 37.35
5,603.36 06/21111 38.51 37.68
5,602.82 09/20111 39.05 38.22
5,602.79 12/21111 39.08 38.25
5,600.82 03/27112 41.05 40.22
5,600.84 06/28112 41.03 40.20
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-5
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,653.70 5,655.18 1.48 155
5,584.43 08 /25/09 70.75 69.27
5,584.51 09/21109 70.67 69.19
5,584.54 11110109 70.64 69.16
5,584.62 12114/09 70.56 69.08
5,584.97 03111110 70.21 68.73
5,585.38 05111110 69.80 68.32
5,585.35 09129110 69.83 68.35
5,585.42 12/21110 69.76 68.28
5,585.08 02/28111 70.10 68.62
5,585.38 06/21111 69.80 68.32
5,585.51 09/20111 69.67 68.19
5,585.76 12/21111 69.42 67.94
5,585.61 03/27112 69.57 68.09
5,585.63 06/28/12 69.55 68.07
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-6
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,663.03 5,664.94 1.91 135
5,589.52 08/25 /09 75.42 73.51
5,589.46 09/22/09 75.48 73.57
5,589.61 11103/09 75.33 73.42
5,589.92 12/14/09 75.02 73.11
5,590.24 03111110 74.70 72.79
5,590.40 05/11110 74.54 72.63
5,590.24 09/29110 74.70 72.79
5,590.49 12/21110 74.45 72.54
5,590.16 02/28/11 74.78 72.87
5,590.44 06/21111 74.50 72.59
5,590.35 09/20111 74.59 72.68
5,590.67 12/21111 74.27 72.36
5,590.34 03/27112 74.60 72.69
5,590.32 06/28112 74.62 72.71
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-7
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.39 5,649.26 1.87 120
5,552.56 08/25/09 96.70 94.83
5,558.34 09/21109 90.92 89.05
5,558.82 11110109 90.44 88 .57
5,558.96 12114/09 90.30 88.43
5,559.54 03111110 89.72 87.85
5,559.60 05111110 89.66 87.79
5,559.83 09/29/10 89.43 87.56
5,559.00 12/21110 90.26 88.39
5,559.68 02/28111 89.58 87.71
5,560.43 06/21111 88.83 86.96
5,560.46 09/2 0/11 88.80 86.93
5,560.78 12/21111 88.48 86.61
5,560.92 03 /27112 88.34 86.47
5,560.87 06/28112 88.39 86.52
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-8
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,649.35 5,651.48 2.13 160
5,589.01 08/25/09 62.47 60.34
5,589.10 09/21109 62.38 60.25
5,589.09 11103 /09 62.39 60.26
5,603.38 12114/09 48.10 45.97
5,589.68 03111110 61.80 59.67
5,589.95 05111110 61.53 59.40
5,589.74 09129 /10 61.74 59.61
5,589.97 12/21110 61.51 59.38
5,589.67 02/28111 61.81 59.68
5,589.96 06/21111 61.52 59.39
5,589.82 09/20111 61.66 59.53
5,590.18 12121111 61.30 59.17
5,589.85 03127112 61.63 59.50
5,589.84 06/28112 61.64 59.51
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-9
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,645.68 5,647.45 1.77 102.5
5,582.05 08/25/09 65.40 63.63
5,582.12 09/22/09 65.33 63.56
5,582.27 11110109 65.18 63.41
5,582.53 12114/09 64.92 63.15
5,582.92 03 /11110 64.53 62.76
5,583.06 05111110 64.39 62.62
5,583.25 09/29110 64.20 62.43
5,583.57 12/21110 63.88 62.11
5,583.54 02/28111 63.91 62.14
5,583.92 06/21111 63.53 61.76
5,584.04 09/20111 63.41 61.64
5,587.42 12/21111 60.03 58.26
5,584.56 03/27/12 62.89 61.12
5,584.55 06/28112 62.90 61.13
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-IO
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,664.63 5,666.98 2.35 107.5
5,584.18 08/25/09 82.80 80.45
5,584.40 09/22/09 82.58 80.23
5,584.61 11110109 82.37 80.02
5,584.90 12114/09 82.08 79.73
5,585.21 03111110 81.77 79.42
5,585.42 05111110 81.56 79.21
5,585.42 09/29110 81.56 79.21
5,585.68 12/21110 81.30 78.95
5,585.60 02/28111 81.38 79.03
5,585.95 06/21111 81.03 78.68
5,585.92 09/20111 81.06 78.71
5,586.22 12/21111 80.76 78.41
5,586.16 03/27112 80.82 78.47
5,586.16 06/28112 80.82 78.47
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN-ll
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,683.16 5,684.53 1.37 147.5
5,613.00 11103/09 71.53 70.16
5,613.88 12114/09 70.65 69.28
5,614.65 03111110 69.88 68.51
5,615.16 05111110 69.37 68.00
5,614.93 09/29110 69.60 68.23
5,615.09 12/21110 69.44 68.07
5,614.96 02/28111 69.57 68.20
5,615.12 06/21111 69.41 68.04
5,614.96 09/20111 69.57 68.20
5,615.18 12/21111 69.35 67.98
5,615.11 03/27112 69.42 68.05
5,615.12 06/28112 69.41 68.04
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-12
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,667.03 5,668.24 1.21 115
5,628.33 11103/09 39.91 38.70
5,628.86 12114/09 39.38 38.17
5,630.27 03111110 37.97 36.76
5,631.64 05111110 36.60 35.39
5,633.73 09129110 34.51 33.30
5,633.43 12121110 34.81 33.60
5,634.35 02/28111 33.89 32.68
5,635.95 06/21111 32.29 31.08
5,636.44 09/20111 31.80 30.59
5,638.93 12/21111 29.31 28.10
5,639.69 03/27112 28.55 27.34
5,639.74 06/28112 28.50 27.29
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-13
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,633.04 5,634.32 1.28 120
5,586.95 11103/09 47.37 46.09
5,587.22 12114/09 47.10 45.82
5,587.45 03/11110 46.87 45.59
5,587.64 05111110 46.68 45.40
5,587.37 09/29110 46.95 45.67
5,587.77 12/21110 46.55 45.27
5,587.64 02/28111 46.68 45.40
5,587.89 06/21111 46.43 45.15
5,588.03 09120111 46.29 45.01
5,588.30 12/21111 46.02 44.74
5,588.32 03/27/12 46.00 44.72
5,588.30 06/28112 46.02 44.74
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-14
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.80 5,649.53 1.73 135
5,586.18 11104/09 63.35 61.62
5,586.51 12114/09 63.02 61.29
5,586.71 03111110 62.82 61.09
5,586.72 05111110 62.81 61.08
5,586.53 09/29110 63.00 61.27
5,586.80 12/21110 62.73 61.00
5,586.74 02/28/11 62.79 61.06
5,586.84 06121111 62.69 60.96
5,586.73 09120111 62.80 61.07
5,586.98 12/21111 62.55 60.82
5,587.07 03/27112 62.46 60.73
5,587.10 06/28/12 62.43 60.70
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-IS
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,675.01 5,676.49 1.48 155
5,594.12 11110109 82.37 80.89
5,584.03 12114/09 92.46 90.98
5,584.10 03/11110 92.39 90.91
5,584.16 05111110 92.33 90.85
5,584.26 09/29110 92.23 90.75
5,584.30 12121110 92.19 90.71
5,584.04 02/28111 92.45 90.97
5,584.30 06/21111 92.19 90.71
5,584.37 09/20111 92.12 90.64
5,584.49 12/21111 92.00 90.52
5,584.47 03/27/12 92.02 90.54
5,584.49 06/28/12 92.00 90.52
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-16
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,651.07 5,652.70 1.63 100
5,603.34 11104/09 49.36 47.73
5,603.56 12114/09 49.14 47.51
5,603.84 03111110 48.86 47.23
5,604.31 05/11110 48.39 46.76
5,604.28 09/29110 48.42 46.79
5,604.39 12121110 48.31 46.68
5,604.20 02/28111 48.50 46.87
5,604.55 06/21111 48.15 46.52
5,604.74 09/20111 47.96 46.33
5,604.94 12121111 47.76 46.13
5,604.84 03/27112 47.86 46.23
5,604.85 06/28112 47.85 46.22
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-17
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,639.73 5,641.55 1.82 100
5,605.96 11104/09 35.59 33.77
5,606.27 12114/09 35.28 33.46
5,606.25 03111110 35.30 33.48
5,606.55 05111110 35.00 33.18
5,606.77 09/29110 34.78 32.96
5,607.15 12/21110 34.40 32.58
5,606.96 02/28111 34.59 32.77
5,607.22 06/21111 34.33 32.51
5,607.40 09/20111 34.15 32.33
5,607.85 12121111 33.70 31.88
5,607.67 03 /27112 33.88 32.06
5,607.68 06/28112 33.87 32.05
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN -18
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,643.95 5,645.45 1.50 100
5,586.85 11102/09 58.60 57.10
5,600.14 12114/09 45.31 43.81
5,587.36 03111110 58.09 56.59
5,587.71 05/11110 57.74 56.24
5,587.50 09/29110 57.95 56.45
5,607.66 12/21110 37.79 36.29
5,587.35 02/28111 58.10 56.60
5,587.71 06/21111 57.74 56.24
5,587.65 09/20111 57.80 56.30
5,587.95 12/21111 57.50 56.00
5,587.05 03/27112 58.40 56.90
5,587.05 06/28/12 58.40 56.90
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-19
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,659.59 5,661.36 1.77 110
5,606.17 11102/09 55.19 53.42
5,606.70 12114/09 54.66 52.89
5,607.22 03111110 54.14 52.37
5,607.89 05/11110 53.47 51.70
5,607.98 09/29110 53.38 51.61
5,608.41 12/21110 52.95 51.18
5,608.49 02/28/11 52.87 51.10
5,608.60 06/21111 52.76 50.99
5,609.17 09/20111 52.19 50.42
5,608.90 12/21111 52.46 50.69
5,608.87 03127/12 52.49 50.72
5,608.86 06128/12 52.50 50.73
TabG
Laboratory Analytical Reports
EN:RGY www.energylab.com
Analylit:afExcsllent:B Sines 1952
. Helena, MT 877 .. 472 .. 071 t • Billings, MT 800 .. 735-4489 . Gasper, WY 888-235-0515
LABORATO RIES 'IDli~~~~wY8·&6 ... 86-j115 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888 .. 690-2218
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
May 01,2012
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C12041150 Quote 10: C3317 -Nitrate and Chloride Sampling
Project Name: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2012
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 28 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 4/24/2012 for
analysis.
Sample 10 Client Sample 10 Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C12041150-001 TWN-13_04182012 04/18/12 7:18 04/24/12 Aqueous Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
C 12041150-002 TWN-13R_04182012 04/18/126:40 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12041150-003 TWN-08_04182012 04/18/128:09 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12041150-004 TWN-05_04182012 04/18/129:45 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 1 2041150-005 TWN-01 -04182012 04/18/12 10:32 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12041150-006 TWN-10_04192012 04/19/12 13:38 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12041150-007 TWN-04_04182012 04/18/12 12:55 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12041150-008 TWN-12_04182012 04/18/12 13:44 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12041150-009 TWN-06_04182012 04/18/12 14:31 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12041150-010 TWN-15_04202012 04/20/126:27 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12041150-011 TWN-11 -04192012 04/19/12 7:55 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12041150-012 TWN-18_04192012 04/19/12 8:45 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12041150-013 TWN-07 _04202012 04/20/12 6:40 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12041150-014 TWN-16_04192012 04/19/12 10:01 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12041150-015 TWN-14_04202012 04/20/12 6:50 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12041150-016 TWN-19_04192012 04/19/12 12:02 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12041150-017 TWN-17_04202012 04/20/12 6:56 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12041150-018 TWN-09_04202012 04/20/127:03 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
------_._-----------------------_._------_._------_._----------... ----------------------------------.----------------------------"-----------_. __ ._-------_._-------_._---------
C12041150-019 TWN-03_04202012 04/20/127:15 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
-----_._--------------------------------------_._------------------------_._------------_._------------------------_._-----------------------------------------------------------------_._------------_._--------------------------------_._-
C 12041150-020 TWN-02_04202012 04/20/127:25 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
-------------------------------------------------------------_._------_ .. _---------------------------------------------"'------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------"'---------"'--
C12041150-021 TWN-15R_04192012 04/19/12 6:35 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12041150-022 TVVN-60_04202012 04/20/12 13:30 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12041150-023 TWN-65_04182012 04/18/12 12:55 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C 12041150-024 TVVN-70_04202012 04/20/12 6:27 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12041150-025 Piez-01_04202012 04/20/12 13:05 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12041150-026 Piez-02_04202012 04/20/12 12:35 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
C12041150-027 Piez-03_04202012 04/20/12 12:50 04/24/12 Aqueous Same As Above
Page 1 of 16
EI\ERGY
LAB ORATORIES
www.energyJab.com " ,',' ,}elena,MT871"472 .. 0711 . Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
AnalyticJilExtsJIencsSim 7952 <k ~,;,.':"". ,h ~lJi~tte.;wY8'6~6~6 .. 717~ • Rapid CIty, SI} 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
C12041150-028 Temp Blank 04/24/12 Aqueous Temperature
The analyses presented in this report were performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper,
WY 82601, unless otherwise noted. Radiochemistry analyses were performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2325
Kerzell Lane, Casper, WY 82601, unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted
in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet
weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. Data corrected for moisture content are typically noted as -
dry on the report. For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried and ground prior
to sample analysis.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By:
c5¥~ £; uJ~'Y
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2012.05.01 16:14:58 -06:00
Page 2 of 16
~~""7'""""'---'-------'---------------www.energyJab.com
Analytical Excsllsncs Sines 1952
Helena,MT877 .. 472 .. 0111 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~Gilleti:!!',WY-e66-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD. 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project : 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2012 Report Date: 05/01/12
Sample Delivery Group: C12041150 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4"C (±2"C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SD
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001, Radiochemical WY200002; Utah: WY00002; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C836
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 3 of 16
EN:RGY
LA80RAT ORIES
www.energyJab.com
Analytical ExCIIUtHlCB Sines 1952
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735w4489 -Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~ill~tte, WY 866 .. 686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Denison Mines USA Corp
2nd Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab ID: C12041150-001
Client Sample ID: TWN-13_04182012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C 12041150-002
Client Sample ID: TWN-13R_04182012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
LablD: C 12041150-003
Client Sample ID: TWN-08_04182012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
LablD: C 120411 50-004
Client Sample ID: TWN-05_04182012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Report Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
Definitions: QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
53 mg/L
NO mg/L
Result Units
NO
NO
mg/l
mg/l
Result Units
15
NO
mg/l
mg/l
Result Units
39
0.3
mg/l
mg/l
Qualifiers RL
0.1
Qualifiers RL
0.1
Qualifiers RL
0.1
Qualifiers RL
0.1
Report Date: 05/01/12
Collection Date: 04/18/12 07:18
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 14:43 1 Ir
E353.2 04/26/1214:151 de
Collection Date: 04/18/1206:40
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 14:441 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 14:221 de
Collection Date: 04/18/12 08:09
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
MCL!
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 14:46 1 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 14:251 de
Collection Date: 04/18/1209:45
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 14:481 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 14:27 1 de
MCl -Maximum contaminant level ..
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 16
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylal>.com f::" · '.,. .. :Helena, .1It 817 -472-0711 • Billings, MT ao8-73H 41l9 • Casper, WY .88-235-0515
AnalyticalExcsllsncsSincs 1952 .£;£:,," ., '~lne.tte! WY 86~-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Denison Mines USA Corp
2nd Quarter Nitrate 2012
LablD: C 12041150-005
Client Sample ID: TWN-01_04182012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C12041150-006
Client Sample ID: TWN-10_04192012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C12041150-007
Client Sample ID: TWN-04_04182012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
LablD: C 120411 50-008
Client Sample ID: TWN-12_04182012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Report RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Definitions: QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
17 mg/L
0.6 mg/L
Result Units
28
0.9
mg/L
mg/L
Result Units
24
1.1
mg/L
mg/L
Result Units
106 mg/L
1.2 mg/L
Qualifiers Rl
0.1
Qualifiers Rl
0.1
Qualifiers Rl
0.1
Qualifiers Rl
0.1
Report Date: 05/01/12
Collection Date: 04/18/12 10:32
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 14:51 fir
E353.2 04/26/12 14:30 1 de
Collection Date: 04/19/12 13:38
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 14:52 1 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 14:321 de
Collection Date: 04/18/12 12:55
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
MeL!
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 14:541 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 14:351 de
Collection Date: 04/18/12 13:44
Date Received : 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 14:561 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 14:37 1 de
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 5 of 16
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical ExcsIIIHlCB Sincs 1952
,HeJena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~Gillette, W'f 866-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Denison Mines USA Corp
2nd Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab 10: C 12041150-009
Client Sample 10: TWN-06_04182012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab 10: C12041150-010
Client Sample 10: TWN-15_04202012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab 10: C12041150-011
Client Sample 10: TWN-11_04192012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab 10: C12041150-012
Client Sample 10: TWN-18_04192012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Report RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Definitions: QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
22 mg/L
1.1 mg/L
Result Units
46
1.6
mg/L
mg/L
Result Units
71
1.6
mg/L
mg/L
Result Units
64
2.1
mg/L
mg/L
Qualifiers RL
0.1
Qualifiers RL
0.1
Qualifiers RL
0.1
Qualifiers RL
0.1
Report Date: 05/01/12
Collection Date: 04/18/12 14:31
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 14:581 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 14:401 dc
Collection Date: 04/20/1206:27
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15 :09 fir
E353.2 04/26/12 14:421 dc
Collection Date: 04/19/1207:55
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
MCL!
A4500-CI B 04/26/1215:11 fir
E353.2 04/26/1215:15/dc
Collection Date: 04/19/12 08:45
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15:171 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 15 :22 1 dc
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 16
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energyJab.com
Analytical ExCIIlIsncB Sines 1952
.H.elena, MT 871-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
$lillette,WY 86&:-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Denison Mines USA Corp
2nd Quarter Nitrate 2012
LablD: C12041150-013
Client Sample ID: TWN-07 _04202012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C12041150-014
Client Sample ID: TWN-16_04192012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
LablD: C12041150-015
Client Sample ID: TWN-14_04202012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C12041150-016
Client Sample ID: TWN-19_04192012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Report RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Definitions: QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
6 mg/l
1.2 mg/L
Result Units
50
2.0
Result
27
3.4
mg/L
mg/L
Units
mg/L
mg/L
Result Units
117 mg/L
6.8 mg/L
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Qualifiers Rl
1
0.1
Qualifiers Rl
0.1
Qualifiers Rl
D 0.2
Qualifiers Rl
D 0.2
Report Date: 05/01/12
Collection Date: 04/20/1206:40
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15:191 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 15 :25 1 dc
Collection Date: 04/19/12 10:01
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15:221 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 15:27 1 dc
Collection Date: 04/20/1206:50
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel
MeL!
Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15:251 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 15 :30 1 dc
Collection Date: 04/19/12 12:02
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15:26 1 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 15:32 1 dc
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7 of 16
EN:RGY
LABORAT ORIES
www.energylab.comHelena.MT871~472-0711 .Billings.MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
AnalyticalExcsJlsncsSincs '952 . ;~iil'~tfe, w.Y86.~-686 .. 717~. Rapid City, S[} 888-672-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Denison Mines USA Corp
2nd Quarter Nitrate 2012
LablD: C12041150-017
Client Sample ID: TWN-17_04202012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C12041150-018
Client Sample ID: TWN-09_04202012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
LablD: C12041150-019
Client Sample ID: TWN-03_04202012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
LablD: C 120411 50-020
Client Sample ID: TWN-02_04202012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Report RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Definitions: QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
80 mg/L
9.1 mg/L
Result Units
209 mg/L
10.6 mg/L
Result Units
152 mg/L
24 mg/L
Result Units
103 mg/L
48 mg/L
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Qualifiers Rl
D 0.5
Qualifiers Rl
1
D 0.5
Qualifiers Rl
D
Qualifiers Rl
D
Report Date: 05/01/12
Collection Date: 04/20/1206:56
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15:28 1 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 15 :35 1 dc
Collection Date: 04/20/12 07:03
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15:42 1 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 15:37 1 dc
Collection Date: 04/20/1207:15
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
MeL!
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15:441 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 15:401 dc
Collection Date: 04/20/1207:25
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15:521 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 15:421 dc
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 8 of 16
E~RGY
L ABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical Exc8llsncB Sincs1952
Helena, MTB77-472-071t • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
:~in~tt¢J VIY 8&6-6B6':7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Denison Mines USA Corp
2nd Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab 10: C12041150-021
Client Sample 10: TWN-15R_04192012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab 10: C 12041150-022
Client Sample 10: TWN-60_04202012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab 10: C12041150-023
Client Sample 10: TWN-65_04182012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab 10: C12041150-024
Client Sample 10: TWN-70_04202012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Report RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Definitions: QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
1 mg/L
NO mg/L
Result Units
1
NO
mg/L
mg/L
Result Units
24
1.1
mg/L
mg/L
Result Units
46
1.7
mg/L
mg/L
Qualifiers Rl
0.1
Qualifiers Rl
0.1
Qualifiers Rl
0.1
Qualifiers Rl
0.1
Report Date: 05/01/12
Collection Date: 04/19/12 06:35
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15 :53 1 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 15 :50 1 de
Collection Date: 04/20/12 13:30
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15 :54 fir
E353.2 04/26/12 15:57 1 de
Collection Date: 04/18/12 12:55
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
MeL!
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15:561 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 16:001 de
Collection Date: 04/20/1206:27
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15:581 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 16:021 de
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 16
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
www.energylab.com
Analytical Excsll8l1CB Sines 1952
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489-Casper, WY 888-235-0515
!1111~he, WY 86&-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Denison Mines USA Corp
2nd Quarter Nitrate 2012
LablD: C 12041150-025
Client Sample ID: Piez-01_04202012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C 120411 50-026
Client Sample ID: Piez-02_04202012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
LablD: C 12041150-027
Client Sample ID: Piez-03_04202012
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C 12041150-028
Client Sample ID: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
Definitions: QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
58 mg/l
6.6 mg/l
Result Units
8
0.2
mg/l
mg/l
Result Units
53
1.7
mg/l
mg/l
Result Units
2.6
o -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Qualifiers
0
Qualifiers
Qualifiers
Qualifiers
Rl
0.2
Rl
0.1
Rl
1
0.1
Rl
Report Date: 05/01/12
Collection Date: 04/20/12 13:05
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date / By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 15 :59 1 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 16 :05 1 dc
Collection Date: 04/20/12 12:35
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date / By
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 16:00 1 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 16:07 1 dc
Collection Date: 04/20/12 12:50
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qel Method Analysis Date / By
MeL!
A4500-CI B 04/26/12 16:021 Ir
E353.2 04/26/12 16:101 dc
Collection Date: Not Provided
DateReceived: 04/24/12
Matrix: Aqueous
Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
E170.1 04/24/12 09:30 1 kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 10 of 16
EN:RGY www.energylab.com Helena, MT 871-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
_'~m~~!}! wr 86~ .. 6B6-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, lX 888-690-2218 LABORATORIES Analytical ExcsllSflcS Sines 7952
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2012
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-CI B
Sample 10: MBLK9-120426A
Chloride
Sample 10: C12041131-001AMS
Chloride
Sample 10: C12041131-001AMSO
Chloride
Sample 10: C12041150-009AMS
Chloride
Sample 10: C12041150-009AMSO
Chloride
Sample 10: LCS35-120426A
Chloride
Sample 10: C12041150-015AMS
Chloride
Sample 10: C12041150-015AMSO
Chloride
Sample 10: C12041150-027AMS
Chloride
Sample 10: C12041150-027AMSO
Chloride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Method Blank
NO mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
36.2 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
36.5 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
57.8 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
57.4 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
3580 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
115 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
116 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
144 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
143 mg/L
Report Date: 05/01/12
Work Order: C 12041150
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
1.0
1.0 102
1.0 103
1.0 102
1.0 101
1.0 101
1.0 99
1.0 100
1.0 102
1.0 101
Batch: 120426A-CL-TTR-W
Run: TITRATION_120426A 04/26/1213:22
Run: TITRATION_120426A
90 110
Run: TITRATION_120426A
90 110
Run: TITRATION 120426A -
90 110
Run: TITRATION_120426A
90 110
Run: TITRATION_120426A
90 110
Run: TITRATION 120426A -
90 110
Run: TITRATION_120426A
90 110
Run: TITRATION 120426A -
90 110
Run: TITRATION 120426A -
90 110
1.0
0.6
0.8
0.6
04/26/12 14:35
04/26/12 14:37
10
04/26/12 14:59
04/26/12 15:00
10
04/26/12 15:01
04/26/12 15:47
04/26/12 15:48
10
04/26/12 16:03
04/26/12 16:05
10
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 11 of 16
EI'.ERGY www.energylab.com Helena, MTB77-472-071 t • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
~ ~m~fte, WY 8&6-686-7175 • Rapid Cfty, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218 LABORATORIES Analytical Excsl/sncli Sines 1152
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 05/01/12
Project: 2nd Quarter Nitrate 2012 Work Order: C12041150
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E353.2 Batch: R158954
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method Blank Run: TECHNICON_120426A 04/26/12 12:42
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N NO mg/L 0.10
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample Run: TECHNICON_120426A 04/26/12 13:35
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.39 mg/L 0.10 96 90 110
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: TECHNICON_120426A 04/26/12 13:37
Nftrogen, Nitrate+Nftrite as N 1.87 mg/L 0.10 95 90 110
Sample 10: C12041150-001BMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: TECHNICON_120426A 04/26/12 14: 17
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.85 mg/L 0.10 94 90 110
Sample 10: C12041150-001 BMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TECHNICON_120426A 04/26/12 14:20
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.89 mg/L 0.10 96 90 110 2.1 10
Sample 10: C12041150-011BMS Sample Matrix Spike Run : TECHNICON_120426A 04/26/1215:17
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 3.36 mg/L 0.10 91 90 110
Sample 10: C12041150-011BMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TECHNICON_120426A 04/26/12 15:20
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 3.35 mg/L 0.10 91 90 110 0.3 10
Sample 10: C12041150-021BMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: TECHNICON_120426A 04/26/12 15:52
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.84 mg/L 0.10 94 90 110
Sample 10: C12041150-021BMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TECHNICON_120426A 04/26/12 15:55
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.86 mg/L 0.10 95 90 110 1.1 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 12 of 16
EN:RGY
LABORATORIES
m '" www.energylab.com ~ &, AII8/ytica1 ExcsllBllCf SiIlCB 1952
Heiena, MT 877-472..;0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WV 888-235-0515
.~ill~tt;¢, Wy 866:,~B6-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
1111111111111 il~ 11111111111111 ~IIIIIII
C12041150
Login completed by: Tracy Judge
Reviewed by: BL2000\tedwards
Reviewed Date: 4/25/2012
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
(Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters
such as pH, DO, Res CI, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.)
Containerffemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes D
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
2.6'C On Ice
Yes D
Yes 0'
Date Received: 4/24/2012
Received by: tj
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
Carrier FedEx
name:
Not Present D
Not Present D
Not Present 0'
No VOA vials submitted 0'
Not Applicable D
Page 13 of 16
"'0 Q)
CO (1)
~ +::.
o -~
0)
............... ~...........--~
Ef\ER~ Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record
PLEASE PRINT (Provide_~s m~h ioformation .as possibl~)
page_' _of~ 'M,_,u-unA'
EPA/State Compliance:
Yes g , No 0
comPDme:,
e.n. ~Oi"
Project Name, PWS, PermiCEtc. I Sample Origin
.2y\~ Q\M...("+e.r N I+('""t~ ;to\!t. State: l).~ M;(\~
Contact Nam e: Phone/Fax: Report Mail Address: 'PO 'BC)( 8' O~
B \"(\a~,,q ~ 84511 Cro..rr,l(\ 'P ~\01e(" 4~ ,,8 ~~ \ -Invoice Contact & Phone: . . Address: '-. InvoIce .c,) ~e D t\ ~ ~ 6.. -lv-.r k L..\~S '7€ ..222. \
Special Report/Formats: ~ ~&11 W~O@ OO§®01J~(g[Q)
DDW
DpOTWIWWTP o State: ----o Other: ----
D EDD/EDT(Electronic Data)
Format: ___ _
D LEVEL IV o NELAC
o ~ ~OCl)~ ~1ll:gOI (fi ._> (5 >-Ci) ~(/)~~~ 03:= co c> r-u<c~I.Q·S a ,-1ll1~ -'-Qj JH c: -;:: (")
(I) c...('OI~ C (1\ ..c~ co' ; \ E Q) _= CD ~ ""I ~Q.<CI5rCl ....
E >1 .". ~ ~ !----------~---,----_+_--__;_t)
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection MATRIX ~
Name, Location,lnterval, etc. Date _JJ
n-w~ )?ill~ \ ~2..0\~ "'\/lg/1~ 01,g 2-W )(
~fj_ iR_O~lK::LO\~ 1~/l1i''J.. Cb40 ;2"'W :i
3 "'vJ~ .. OLO\"\H'~~ ~/rxlJ2. :L-W "; OK 0:\
4 '1:vJN-_O.5-u~ t K2..0i2 ~ I~I US I J:}' 10'\'"\.5 2.,-"'-.J
5 . ,vJ/V -Q' _ 0"\' ~\~ 1'-\"8/,~ I ~O~ :1-vv' '/.
'1A~/l~ I )-:)38 6
1'NN .. \ 0_0 '" ''1.2.0 \;t t 2-W
7-rwN .. O~_04'Kd..Otl. 14/lg/t2.! I~ ~-vJ ')(
8IvJtJ-12_0~\~~J2. 1'1/1i(/1~ Ir~yY ~-w y
9 "T\NN -01>_O'1,g,()\~J~/lg!,~ I \'-\'11 2-vJ [)<
10~\,VtJ-l!;_Ot..t:l{)U)\~l1PDI1d. I DU, .::2..-W x
Custody Record ~~~~~~~~~~ \too
Received by (print):
Receivedby (print):
t=' o ~ lJ.l _
I "0 (J § « e J-m t-E « ~
W "E W en
C/) ~ ro
Ci5
Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
~Y\nc(' +I ollitlAt
Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order: ..
R
u
5
H
DatefTime:
DatefTime:
Contact ELI prior to
RUSH sample submittal
for charges and
scheduling -See
Instruction Page
Comments:
Clle~;f
Receipt Temp
r2,~ °C
On lee: ~N
Custody Seal
On Bottle ~N On Cooler N
Intact N
Signature N
Match
I~ I~
~ l~ I~ ~
~
~ ,~
~ (6)
1~CJ.20~a
~
Signature:
Signature:
MUSTbe~------------------------------~~~~~ __ ~~~~~ __ ~~~ ____ ~
S· d l ' ~'inature: Igne Samj)le D~osal: Return t9 C~nt: Lab Disposal: ~I
In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to compl~~h4al'~iS/requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All SUb-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report. \ \J "\J'
•• •• " • • ~ , .... • L_~_ ..... __ .~_" ,.al"·uunl""",.,,..hl,,, .f ____ k",.. .. I,o. fnrrnC!' ~nti link~
"U Q) co CD
~
(JI
o -.,
~
0)
.. -------------_ .. ~-----. .. _ ...... -------. --.... --_._.-.,
Company Name: Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. Sample Origin EPA/State Compliance:
State: Yes 0 No 0
Report Mail Address:
StlYVI-C
Contact Name: ~ Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print) 1
I
rA-S. \ (-A. c1 e..
Invoice Address: Invoice Contact & Phone: ~ Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
Special Report/Formats: s: ~&11 )1@O® OO~@l1D~@LI~[Q) .. Contact EU prior to .ShiJ:~
0 "-RUSH sample submittal ~o (/)~ ~ for charges and "COoler 10(s):
~m;gOICi3 r::: 0 < R scheduling -See Cf,:v,.,1-._> 0 >oro w t:, I nstruction Page D OW 0 EDO/EDT(Electronic Data) ~(/)~~3: ~ 03:= ~ C» I "C Receipt Temp o POTWNVWTP Format: (J c Comments: ~«~I.Q~ :J U o ~ml c: \J « 0 ,2{., °c D State: 0 LEVEL IV •• Q) c: .-I-m ... ~1Q 00 c: -o Other: D NELAC ~~I~I \\: ~ ... On Ice: 0:)N ::J :J~~I&3: l-S Z a.. (J.)O W "E Custody Seal ~ >1 l W ctI D""'" ~ N en "C On Cooler N en c:
i9 H Intact N C/) SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection MATRI.~ Signature aN {Name, Location, Interval, etc.) Date Time Match
1
-rwJ\}"'"11_04l 'I2.D \-:t 41'0.1 t:l. 01'S~ ,2-W Va I~
2 i4/J~fl~ 08'15 :2.-vJ I~ ""1WN-\)(. ,O~ \,\;2,.012-~
3 '1/~/JA Db40 =Z-w 'I IQ) ~tJ ... 01_0~!l.P;tOl:l nnn
4 U./IQ/o. 2 ... W 'f ~ ",wN-I..b_04lq~O 12 tOOl ~
~vJtJ-\'i O'i2D~}~ i1/:JJ:>I Ie?.. ob5() ;L .... ~ X '= ~
6 "f¥JN· t <1_ 04 t q a..ot1. !'1h'\/I=l ~O2-~-\A-") Y. ~
7 ~JJ-11_o\.\~D201.l.. Y/;10/t:t Db5~ .2.-W ~ lit::! I~
iW fJ-0'1 __ {)l1!lO~I~ y/~o/J':L Oio~ ..:l,-W y ~
-TvJN -O~_ O~~;tO~ l.{{ UJ/ L.2 OilS .:J..-w )if 1~2)~I~ Tw f\.J -O:t _ 0 '1 :1.,(.).2,0 (:2-i'1l !JJ}/I~ o·1:J,.~ ::l ... W y. leJ
Custody r?,;~u;;ed N~(lt;lUj 4 /~/:i~ "oa ~~~ ~~:tu~lI~k Received by (print): DatelTime: Signature:
Record Relinquished by (print): 0 DatelTlme: Signature: V' Received by (print): DatelTime: Signature:
MUST be
Signed Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal: Kecelv" 0: zL;:7i 9 .. _~e/nme\ 1Jh'JA ~ignature:
~ -.
""U Q) co co
~
0)
o .......
~
0)
II/SJJ..~lIr~fftY Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record
PLEASE PRINT (Provide as much information as possible.)
Page~of ~
Company Name: Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. I Sample Origin EPA/State Compliance:
State: Yes D No 0
Report Mail Address: s (~yV\ d contact;:~ 15:~ ~ ) Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
I nvoice Address: Invoice Contact & Phone: <::::s Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
Special Report/Formats: 5: &r;:[]&11 'i1@50@ rru~®C!D[§@LJ@:[Q) o ..... ~O(/)~ ~m;gOI ~ ._> 0 ~10 a,,, en (0:::..
Cl w
• ~I R ~
Contact ELI prior to
RUSH sample submittal
for charges and
scheduling -See
L5ni~edbY:
. ~.
Cooler lO(s):
eL~ c: "'''U5 (/):> ....... 03:1S~C) ,~ ~ « cnl·Q ~ -:-;, o .... m1c ",,4
.... Q) 1B r:: 'i:: rtl ~~I~O L"I Er-> ro I '-I :::JJ!:!~I~5: oW za.. (1)0 ++ E >1 ~ ~
Ie
Dow o POlWMlWTP o State: ----o Other: ___ _
D EDD/EDT(Electronic Data)
Format: ____ _
D LEVEL IV o NELAC
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection
Name, Location, Interval, etc. Date ColI~tion I MATRIX Time
~ n,
\"".01
Ob~ ..2-vJ ~-
~~ :l.-"-' ;x
3 l.f"~ 1;1. \25S ;2.-w b{
4.:).O.:tO, ~ '1/:,lC/ I ~ OG:;l7 .2-\IoJ )(
5 l'1.D/l~ 1305 ~~\~ .:l-\J ti
~ .u>/l2. \;2..~:S ;L.-w i
7 /2D/l;2.. )2.50 ~-w ft~~O~I~
1
8 al
9 f
'f
--
10
Signature:' v
Custody I ~ljnqUiSheaby(pri!lV:\ DatelTime: ~lAJ\t1~r Ho\"d.~~ YJ.2?:,/.2..0I~ \l00 ~un:g~:eJ4t;~ Record Relinquished by (print): DatelTime:
I "C
I nstruction Page
Comments: U c::
~ ~ I U
C\1
l-e: ....
<t: :::J
W ~ I 5 w ctI en "C c:: co en I H
Received by (print): DateJTime:
Received by {print): DatelTime:
Receipt Temp
i.G °c
On Ice: _~N
Custody Seal
On Bottle ~ N On Cooler Y N
Intact Y N
Signature N
Match
~ ~~ ~
I 1-.:;::1 ~
~
l~ I~ (6)
~CJ.2cJ4/ /--sl>
I~
Signafure:
Signature:
M~STbe~--------------------------------------------~~~~~~~----~~~--~--____ ~~,gn~a~ure~:--------~
S Ig ned Sample DispQSal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal: J .IM"~ J
In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to compl~ a~SiS requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub·contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report. o::.y
Visit our web site at www.ener~b.com for additional information, downloadl<lhJA fAp. ~('h.,.,-illl,Q fnrrnc> !:Ionrl lin!" ..
TabH
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
B-1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
Volume .l '" Location . 2x Casing Volume Pumped Volume Check Cwiductivity RPD pH :" RPD Temp RPD
Piezometer 1 --2195.0 NC 8.30 NC 15.57 NC
Piezometer 2 --676.3 NC 6.89 NC 15.54 NC
Piezometer 3 --3080.0 NC 12.19 NC 15.41 NC
TWN-l 39.7 79.40 91.00 OK 803.0 804.0 0.12 7.56 7.56 0.00 15.01 15.01 0.00
TWN-2 48.77 97.54 72.00 Pumped Dry 3006.0 NC 6.78 NC 13.51 NC
TWN-3 41.23 82.46 57.00 Pumped Dry 2434.0 NC 7.31 NC 14.83 NC
TWN-4 55.5 111.00 143.00 OK 1034.0 1034.0 0.00 7.34 7.34 . 0.00 14.94 14.93 0.07
TWN-5 52.52 105.04 117.00 OK 3061.0 3061.0 0.00 7.05 7.05 0.00 14.91 14.91 0.00
TWN-6 35.75 71.50 91.00 OK 1541.0 1543 .0 0.13 7.14 7.14 0.00 14.93 14.94 0.07
TWN-7 11.02 22.04 19.00 Pumped Dry 1153.0 NC 7.73 NC 14.76 NC
TWN-8 54.74 109.48 117.00 OK 2369.0 2374.0 0.21 7.60 7.56 0.53 14.57 14.57 0.00
TWN:"9 22.29 44.58 36.00 Pumped Dry 2562.0 NC 6.93 NC 15.33 .' NC
TWN-lO 15.78 31.56 32.00 Pumped Dry 3609.0 NC 4.60 NC 15.66 NC
TWN-ll 47.38 94.76 120.00 OK 2780.0 2780.0 0.00 7.04 7.04 0.00 14.56 14.57 0.07
TWN-12 53.21 106.42 130.00 OK 2465 .0 2464.0 0.04 7.32 7.32 0.00 14.90 14.91 0.07
TWN-13 64 .94 129.88 143.00 OK 860.0 858.1 0.22 8.01 8.01 0.00 14.96 14.95 0.07
TWN-14 47.3 94.60 57.00 Pumped Dry 1021.0 NC 7.91 NC 15.13 NC
TWN-15 40.71 81.42 72.00 Pumped Dry 1568.0 NC 7.27 NC 14.52 NC
TWN-16 34.08 68.16 84.00 OK 1853.0 1848.0 0.27 7.21 7.21 0.00 14.90 14.90 0.00
TWN-17 49.69 99.38 78.00 Pumped Dry 1135.0 NC 7.47 NC 15.09 . NC
TWN-18 57 114.00 132.00 OK 2165.0 2167.0 0.09 7.18 7.18 0.00 14.35 14.35 0.00
TWN-19 37.57 75.14 84.00 OK 1980.0 1972.0 0.40 7.39 7.40 0.14 15.39 15.60 1.36
Piezometers 1, 2, and 3 were not pumped, only one set of parameters were taken.
TWN-2, TWN-3, TWN-7, TWN-9, TWN-14, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were purged to dryness before 2 casing volumes were removed. TWN-1O was purged to dryness after 2 casing volumes
were removed.
RPD > than 10%
;,. I' :,.
Redox Potential ): RPD Turbidity RPD
209 NC 4.0 NC
474 NC 1.6 NC
177 NC 5.2 .. NC
217 216 0.46 27.3 27.4 0.37
454 NC 24.3 NC
395 NC 100.0 NC
233 232 0.43 120.0 118.0 1.68
319 315 1.26 3.0 3.0 0.00
249 248 0.40 10.1 10.0 1.00
309 NC 8.0 NC
113 115 1.75 3.0 3.0 NC
296 NC 11.0 NC
498 NC 75.7 NC
343 340 0.88 2.9 2.9 0.00
191 195 2.07 161.0 165.0 2.45
151 149 1.33 lOA 10.4 0.00
188 NC 42.3 NC
369 NC 22.6 NC
299 296 1.01 2.5 2.5 0.00
360 NC 77.1 NC
336 335 0.30 44.6 44.7 0.22
212 212 0.00 10.6 10.7 0.94
The QAP states that turbidity should be less than 5 Nephelometric Turbidity Units ("NTU") prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a higher turbidity. The QAP does not reguire that turbidity measurements be less than 5 NTU prior to
sarnp>ling. As such the noted observations regarding turbidi!y measurements less than 5 NTU below are included for information I>U!I'oses onl .
. ~
H-2: Holding Time Evaluation
H-3: Analytical Method Check
Nitrate
Chloride A4500-CI B A4500-CI B
Both Nitrate and Chloride were analyzed with the correct analytical method.
H-4: Reporting Limit Evaluation
U = Analyte was not detected at the RL
D = RL was increased due to sample matrix or required dilution due to the sample concentration. In all cases the
analytical results were greater than the reporting limit used.
H-7
Piezometer 1,Piezometer 2, Piezometer 3, TWN-l,TWN-2,
TWN-3,TWN-4,TWN-5,TWN-6,TWN-7,TWN-8, TWN-
C12041150 9,TWN-I0, TWN-ll,TWN-12,TWN-13,TWN-13R, TWN-2.6 °C
14,TWN-15,TWN-15R,TWN-16, TWN-17, TWN-18, TWN-19,
TWN-60,TWN-65,TWN-70
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
Previous
Rinsate Sample Parameter Rinsate Result Well Sample
TWN-13R Nitrogen ND mglL N/A
TWN-13R Chloride ND mglL N/A
TWN-15R Nitrogen ND mglL TWN-06
TWN-15R Chloride 1 mglL TWN-06
TWN-60 Nitrogen ND mglL Piez-01
TWN-60 Chloride 1 mglL Piez-01
The Rmsate sample Identified m Column 1 was collected after the pump was
used to purge the well identified as "Previous Well Sampled" in Column 4
D = Reporting limit raised due to dilution/sample matrix.
Reporting
Result for Well Qualifier Limit
NA 0.1 mglL
NA 1mgIL
1.1 mglL 0.1 mglL
22 mglL 1mgIL
6.6 mglL D 0.1 mglL
58 mglL 1mgIL
Tab I
Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
NS = not sampled; ND = not detected
'-10
till
MW-4
.4.9
TW4-1
0 7.1
TWN-1
~0.6
PIEZ-1
~ 6.6
TW4-27
~41
kriged nitrate isocon and label
kriged nitrate isocon and label
(extent uncertain)
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed October 2011 showing
concentration in mg/L
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2012 NITRATE (mg/L)
(NITRATE + NITRITE AS N)
'APPROVED ' "1 DATE
WHITE MESA SITE
. "REFERENCE
H:/718000/aug12/nitrate/Unt0612.srf
FIGURE
I-I
NS = not sampled; NO = not detected
MW-4
.39
TW4-1
0 42
TWN-1
~17
PIEZ-1
Q 58
TW4-27
*17
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed October, 2011 showing
concentration in mg/L
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2012 CHLORIDE (mg/L)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE FIGURE
H:/718000/aug12/chloride/UcI0612.srf 1-2
TabJ
Analyte Concentrations Over Time
TWN-l
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/6/2009 0.7 19
7/21/2009 0.4 17
9/21/2009 0.4 19
10/28/2009 0.5 18
3/17/2010 0.5 17
5/26/2010 0.6 20
9/27/2010 0.6 19
12/7/2010 0.6 14
1/26/2011 0.5 17
4/20/2011 0.5 19
7/26/2011 0.5 14
10/17/2011 0.5 10
1/9/2012 0.6 15
4/18/2012 0.6 17
TWN-2
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/6/2009 25.4 29
7/21/2009 25 25
9/21/2009 22.6 17
11/2/2009 20.8 55
3/24/2010 62.1 85
6/2/2010 69 97
9/29/2010 69 104
12/9/2010 48 93
2/1/2011 43 93
4/28/2011 40 85
7/28/2011 33 74
10/20/2011 33 76
1/12/2012 31 86
4/20/2012 48 103
TWN-3
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/6/2009 23.6 96
7/21/2009 25.3 96
9/21/2009 27.1 99
11/2/2009 29 106
3/25/2010 25.3 111
6/3/2010 26 118
7/15/2010 27 106
12/10/2010 24 117
2/1/2011 24 138
4/28/2011 26 128
7/29/2011 25 134
10/20/2011 25 129
1/12/2012 25 143
4/20/2012 24 152
, TWN-4
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/6/2009 1 13
7/21/2009 0.05 12
9/21/2009 0.4 13
10/28/2009 0.4 11
3/16/2010 0.9 22
5/27/2010 1.0 22
9/27/2010 0.9 19
12/8/2010 1 21
1/25/2011 0.9 21
4/20/2011 0.9 21
7/26/2011 1.1 35
10/18/2011 0.9 20
1/9/2012 0.9 20
4/18/2012 1.1 24
TWN-5
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 0.22 42
9/21/2009 0.5 45
11/10/2009 0.2 48
3/16/2010 0.3 43
5/26/2010 0.3 44
7/12/2010 0.3 43
12/7/2010 0.3 45
1/25/2011 0.4 47
4/20/2011 0.3 44
7/26/2011 0.3 44
10/17/2011 0.3 45
1/9/2012 0.2 45
4/18/2012 0.3 39
TWN-6
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 3.2 32
9/22/2009 1.6 13
11/3/2009 1.4 21
3/23/2010 1.5 19
6/1/2010 1.4 22
7/13/2010 1.4 73
i2/8/2010 1.2 21
1/26/2011 1.1 18
4/20/2011 1.5 22
7/27/2011 1.1 17
10/18/2011 1.4 21
1/10/2012 1.2 20
4/18/2012 1.1 22
TWN-7
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 ND 11
9/21/2009 ND 7
11/10/2009 0.1 7
3/17/2010 0.8 6
5/28/2010 1.2 6
7/14/2010 1.6 7
12/10/2010 1 4
1/27/2011 1.3 6
4/21/2011 1.7 6
7/29/2011 0.7 5
10/19/2011 2.2 6
1/11/2012 2.3 5
4/20/2012 1.2 6
TWN-8
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I) Notes
8/25/2009 0 11 Nitrate is NO
9/21/2009 0 12 Nitrate is NO
11/10/2009 0 12 Nitrate is NO
3/16/2010 0 11 Nitrate is NO
5/26/2010 0 11 Nitrate is NO
7/12/2010 0 11 Nitrate is NO
12/6/2010 0 9 Nitrate is NO
1/25/2011 0 13 Nitrate is NO
4/18/2011 0 10 Nitrate is NO
7/26/2011 0 18 Nitrate is NO
10/17/2011 0 10 Nitrate is NO
1/9/2012 0 11 Nitrate is NO
4/18/2012 0 15 Nitrate is NO
TWN-9
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 9.3 169
9/22/2009 8.9 201
11/10/2009 12 205
3/23/2010 7.6 183
6/1/2010 7.6 175
7/15/2010 10.7 210
12/9/2010 8 172
2/1/2011 9.5 217
4/28/2011 10 192
7/29/2011 11 208
10/20/2011 10.9 134
1/12/2012 12.2 202
4/20/2012 10.6 209
TWN-l0
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 1.1 19
9/22/2009 1.6 35
11/10/2009 1.4 26
3/23/2010 1.5 54
6/4/2010 1 30
7/14/2010 0.2 21
12/8/2010 1.3 28
1/27/2011 0.3 40
4/21/2011 1.2 28
7/27/2011 0.1 28
10/18/2011 0.2 33
1/10/2012 0.8 44
4/19/2012 0.9 28
TWN-ll
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/3/2009 1.3 74
3/17/2010 1.4 73
6/4/2010 1.3 72
9/27/2010 1.4 76
12/8/2010 1.4 72
1/27/2011 1.4 84
4/26/2011 1.4 76
7/27/2011 0.1 76
10/17/2011 1.6 76
1/10/2012 1.6 69
4/19/2012 1.6 71
TWN-12
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/3/2009 0.5 109
3/17/2010 0.7 113
5/26/2010 0.8 106
7/12/2010 0.7 112
12/7/2010 0.7 103
1/26/2011 4.2 87
4/26/2011 1 109
7/26/2011 0.6 102
10/17/2011 1.2 87
1/10/2012 0.9 104
4/18/2012 1.2 106
TWN-13
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I) Notes
11/4/2009 0.5 83
3/17/2010 0 47 Nitrate ND
5/26/2010 0.1 49
9/27/2010 0.2 53
12/7/2010 0.4 57
1/25/2011 1.6 103
4/26/2011 0 49 Nitrate ND
7/26/2011 0.1 49
10/17/2011 0 48 Nitrate ND
1/9/2012 0 46 Nitrate ND
4/18/2012 0 53 Nitrate ND
TWN-14
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/4/2009 3.4 32
3/24/2010 2.9 24
6/2/2010 2.9 30
7/15/2010 3.5 26
12/10/2010 4.2 28
1/28/2011 3.7 24
4/27/2011 3.5 30
7/29/2011 3.5 25
10/19/2011 3.9 27
1/11/2012 3.5 26
4/20/2012 3.4 27
TWN-15
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/10/2009 1.1 78
3/18/2010 0.7 43
5/28/2010 1.0 39
7/13/2010 1.0 36
12/9/2010 1.2 38
1/27/2011 1.4 43
4/27/2011 1.6 49
7/28/2011 1.6 47
10/19/2011 1.3 38
1/11/2012 1.5 38
4/20/2012 1.6 46
TWN-16
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/4/2009 1 39
3/17/2010 1.2 35
5/27/2010 0.2 35
9/27/2010 2.6 35
12/9/2010 2 30
1/27/2011 4.6 34
4/27/2011 1.6 39
7/27/2011 2.4 31
10/18/2011 2.6 34
1/10/2012 2.8 33
4/19/2012 2 50
TWN-17
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/4/2009 6.7 152
3/24/2010 10.4 78
6/3/2010 11 87
7/15/2010 8.9 66
12/10/2010 8 65
2/1/2011 8.6 90
4/28/2011 9 81
7/29/2011 8.5 74
10/20/2011 8.1 71
1/12/2012 8.7 79
4/20/2012 9.1 80
TWN-18
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/2/2009 1.3 57
3/17/2010 1.6 42
6/1/2010 1.8 63
9/27/2010 1.8 64
12/9/2010 1.6 59
1/27/2011 1.4 61
4/26/2011 1.8 67
7/28/2011 1.8 65
10/18/2011 1.9 60
1/10/2012 1.9 64
4/19/2012 2.1 64
TWN-19
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/2/2009 7.4 125
3/23/2010 7.2 118
6/1/2010 6.2 113
9/29/2010 7.2 113
12/9/2010 7 107
2/1/2011 7 114
4/28/2011 6.9 120
7/28/2011 7.1 113
10/18/2011 6.5 108
1/10/2012 7 114
4/19/2012 6.8 117
Piezometer 1
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/19/2009 6.8 NA
7/14/2009 6.8 60
9/22/2009 7.3 78
10/27/2009 7.4 61
6/2/2010 7.2 52
7/19/2010 6.8 52
12/10/2010 6.5 60
1/31/2011 7 60
4/25/2011 6.8 58
7/25/2011 7 53
10/19/2011 6.6 55
1/11/2012 7.1 78
4/20/2012 6.6 58
Piezometer 2
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/19/2009 0.5 NA
7/14/2009 0.5 7
9/22/2009 0.5 17
10/27/2009 0.6 7
6/2/2010 0.6 8
7/19/2010 0.6 8
12/10/2010 0.2 6
1/31/2011 0.3 9
4/25/2011 0.3 8
7/25/2011 0.1 9
10/19/2011 0.1 8
1/11/2012 0.1 9
4/20/2012 0.2 8
Piezometer 3
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/19/2009 0.7 NA
7/14/2009 0.8 12
9/22/2009 0.8 24
10/27/2009 1.2 19
3/24/2010 1.7 116
6/2/2010 1.6 36
7/19/2010 1.6 35
12/10/2010 1.8 25
1/31/2011 1.8 40
4/25/2011 1.7 35
7/25/2011 1.8 61
10/19/2011 1.7 12
1/11/2012 1.8 20
4/20/2012 1.7 53
Piezometer 4
Date
7/14/2009
Nitrate (mg/I)
1.8
Chloride (mg/I)
46
Piezometer 5
Date
7/14/2009
Nitrate (mg/I)
0.7
Chloride (mg/I)
18
MW-18
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
7/14/2009 ND 51
MW-19
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
7/14/2009 2.2 24
Upper Wildlife Pond
Oate Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I) Note
9/22/2009 0 5 Nitrate NO
10/27/2009 0 3 Nitrate NO
6/2/2010 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride NO
7/19/2010 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride NO
12/10/2010 0 1 Nitrate NO
1/31/2011 0.1 1
4/25/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride NO
7/25/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride NO
10/19/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride NO
1/11/2012 0 2 Nitrate NO
Frog Pond
Date
10/14/09
Nitrate (mg/I)
o
Chloride (mg/I)
o
Notes
Nitrate ND
TabK
Concentration Trend Graphs
en c
0 ;; m ... .., c Cl)
(,) c 0 0
Cl) .., m ... ~
Z
~ • Z
~
r-----r-----r-------r-----.,-------,----.,------,-----.-l ~-PO
0 l ~-JdV
.~~
~ ~-das
H
0
~ ~-qa.::l
./~
~ ~
0~-5nv
.~~
o~-uer
~~~
V~ 60-lnr
V .V
90-oaO
~----~----~---~------~---~------~----+-----+90-unr
co 6
I!)
6
('t")
o
N o
6
,--'-T----i-----r------r------.-~~-PO
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::J
f/) c:
0 ;;
CO .... .... c: Q)
(,) c:
0 o~-5nv
(.)
Q)
" "i:
0
.c: (.)
~ • o~-uer
Z ~
~~--------40----------~+---------~--------~----------1 go-unr
N N 0 o
tJ) c
0 ;; ns ~ ~ c CD 0 c 0
0
CD ~ ns ~ ~
Z
N I Z
~
...------r------,.----r------r----r-----,------,--'--,-l ~-PO
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::l
0~-5nv
o ~-uer
80-oao
~----~------~----~------~----~------~----~----__+80-unr
o 00 o c.o o L() o C") o C\I
o
tJ) c
0 +i CO ... ..,
C
(1)
(.) c
0 U
(1)
"C .~
0
J: U
N I Z ~
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa,:j
o~-5nv
o~-uer
~-------+--------~--------~-------4--------~--------+go-unr
o N o o
~
o CO o CO o N o
U) c:
0 ;;
CO '-.., c:
CI)
() c: 0
(.)
CI) ..,
CO '-~
Z
('I)
I Z ~
r------.r------r----r--.----,------r----.....,-----r l ~-PO
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::l
o ~-6nV'
o~-uer
80-0aO
~------~------~------~------~------+-------~------+80-unr
I.C)
("t') o ("t')
I.C)
N o N
I.C) o
r---~--~---~-----'----""------r----r----r l ~-PO
~ ~-das
60-lnr
90-oao
~----~------~----~-----~-----+------+------+-----+90-unr
o CO o N o o o cx::> o CO o N o
en c: 0 ; ns L. ... c:
CI)
CJ c: 0
(.)
CI) ... ns L. ~ Z
.qo
I Z ~
'.,..------.,..-----,-l ~ -PO
~ ~-des
~ ~-qe,:j
o~-5nv
o~-uer
~-------4--------_+--------~--------4_--------+_------__+g0-unr
cx::> o co o
(1/6w)
N o o
tJ) c: 0
~ CO ~ ..., c:
(1)
0 c: 0
(J
(1)
"C "i:
.9 .c
(J
~ I
Z ~
r-----r-----,----,....-----r-----,----,...---...,...----r l ~ -PO
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa=f
o~-6nv
o~-uer
~----_+------+_-----4------~------+_----_+------4_----__+g0-unr
o C')
lC)
N o
U)
t: 0 ;
CO '-...,
t:
CD 0 t: 0 U
CD ...,
CO '-~
Z
Lt)
I Z ~
r------.,.------r-------r-----r--------r----~ l ~-PO
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa:f
o ~-5nV'
o~-uer
1------+-----+------+-----+------+-----+ 60-lnr
co o IJ")
o
N o o
U)
s::::: 0 ;:;
CO .... ....
s:::::
Q)
()
s:::::
0 (.)
Q)
"C at:
0
J: (.)
Lt') • Z ~
.--------.-----...---------,..----.....--------,.------r l ~-PO
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa:J
o ~-5nV'
o~-uer
f-------i-----+-----+----+------+-----I-60-lnr
o CO o IJ") o N o o
en c
0 ;;
CU ~ ~ C Cl)
0
C
0 U
Cl)
~ CU ~ ~
Z
(0
I Z ~ I-
----r------,------r-----;----.,-----r--------r-l ~-PO
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa~
o~-5nv
o~-uer
1------1-----+-----+----+----+------+----t--60-lnr
I..()
N
N I..()
o
o
tn s:::::
0 ;;
CO L.. ...,
s:::::
CI)
0
s::::: 0 U
CI)
'tl
.~
0
.s::::
U
CO • Z ~
....------,.-------r---..,..-------r-------r------r----r-----r l ~ -PO
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa::l
o~-6nv
o ~-uer
!------4----+---l-----4----+---l-----I-----+ 60-lnr
o CO o LO
o C") o N o
fn t:
0 ;:;
CO '-...,
t: CI)
0 t:
0 U
CI) ...,
CO '-~
Z
...... I Z ~
,-----...,.------,------r--------r-------r l ~-Inr
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa:J
O~-AON
o~-5nv
o ~-AeLI'J
o ~-uer
60-PO
!--------i---------if--------t--------f------+ 60-lnr
l!)
N
N o
I
.-----. ........,-----.,.------r------,---------,-----.,-l ~-PO
~ ~-das
fn c 0 ~ CO .... ..., c
CD 0
C 0 ~ ~-qa.::J
(.)
CD "C ";:
0
J: (.)
r--. • Z ~ o ~-Bn'v'
o~-uer
\-------!----.............;.-----l-----+----+-------+ 60-lnr
o 00 N o
~
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
:::r -C)
E 0.5 -
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
o
Q) o I :; ....,
.... .... .... .... .... .... o
T""" I C ro ....,
.... .... .... .... .... ....
TWN-8 Nitrate Concentrations
TWN-8 Nitrate Concentrations are all Non Detect
o
T""" I 0> :::J «
.... .... .... .....
T"""
I ..c Q)
LL
.... .... ..... ....
T"""
T"""
I c.. Q)
Cf)
.... .... .... .....
N
T""" ~ c.. «
.... .....
N
T""" I U o
tJ)
r::::::
0 ;:;
CO '-..,
r:::::: CD (.)
r:::::: 0 U
CD "C ";::
0
J:
U
CO I Z ~
~ ~-des
~ ~-qe=l
o ~-Bn'v'
o~-uer
f----+---I---+-----j---+----+---+------l---+--+ 60-lnr
o N 00 co N o 00 co N o
...-----...,,....-----.,.------r-------r------.------,------.-l ~-PO
~ ~-das
fJ)
t:
0 ;; cu .... ..,
t: Cl)
(,)
t: ~ ~-qa:J 0 U
Cl) .., cu .... ~
Z
0) • Z ~ o ~-6n\f
o~-uer
!------l------!------+----+----+------l-----+ 60-lnr
N o co N o
tJ) c:
0 ;:; ns ~ ... c:
CD (.) c: 0 0
CD "C "i:
0
J: 0
en I Z ~
..--------r-------.------~-----....._------.-z ~-PO
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::l
o ~-5n'v'
o~-uer
1-------+------1-------+--------1-----+ 60-lnr
o L()
C\I
o o C\I
o L() o o
~
o L() o
(/) t:
0 ;:: ns ... ... t:
G)
0 t: 0
(.)
G) ... ns ... ~
Z
0
~ • Z ~
·--,----..,.-----r-l~-PO
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa~
o ~-5n'v'
o~-uer
1----+----+----+---+---+---+----+----+----+ 60-lnr
N
o
o
t/) c: 0 +:. CO s... ...,
c:
Q)
CJ c: 0 U
Q)
-C "i:
0
.c:
U
0
"'C""" I Z ~
[-
.-------,-----..,.--------r----....,-------,.-----r l ~-PO
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa~
o~-5nv
o ~-uer
I-------+------l-----I------l-----+-----I-60-lnr
o c.o o L() o ('f)
(1/6w)
o
N
o o
tn c:
0 .. ns s... ... c:
(1)
CJ c:
0 (.)
(1) ... ns s... ~
Z
"'C"""
"'C""" I Z ~
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa.::J
o ~-"oN
o~-5nv
o ~-AeV\l
o~-uer
60-PO
f-----I----+----+---+---+----+---l----+----+ 60-l nr
ex)
o
(1/6w)
<.0 o N o o
(/) s::: o +:. CO s... .., s:::
Cl)
(,) s::: o (.)
Cl)
"C "t: o
.J:
(.)
o 0)
1
.1
0
~
/~
~
o co
~~
0
~~
~
o co o LO o C") o C\I o
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
o ~-J\ON
o~-5nv
o ~-Aell\l
o~-uer
60-PO
o
~ ~-oaa
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
tn t: 0 ;; ns .... ... ~ ~-qa.::J t:
CI)
(.)
t: 0
(.)
CI) o ~-J\oN ... ns .... :!:: Z
N
"r'" I Z o~-6nv ~
o ~-AeV\l
o~-uer
60-PO
I-----I-----I----+----+----+---+----+----+----+-60-l nr
l.() N l.() o
N o
tn t: 0 +:. ns ... ... t:
CD (.)
t: 0 (J
CD "C "t:
0
.J:
(J
N
~ • Z ~
,.--___ -,-____ ..,.--. ___ -.,-____ ...,..-___ ---,. ____ --r l ~ -Inr
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa:j
o ~-l\oN
o~-5nv
o ~-Ael/\J
o~-uer
60-PO
1--------+-----+------+-----+------+-----1-60-lnr
o N
~
o o
~
o 00 o c.o o N o
en c 0 +:i cu ~ ... c
CD (.)
C 0
(J
CD ... CU ~ :!:: Z
M
'r"'" I Z ~
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa,:j
O~-AON
o~-5nv
o ~ -l\eV\l
o~-uer
60-PO
1----+----+---+----+---+---+---+----+----+ 60-lnr
co
o
(1/6w)
co a N
o o
tn t: 0 .. cu ... ... t:
CI)
0 t: 0 (J
CI)
"C "i:
0
.c:
(J
M
~
I Z ~
,--,-------r-------,-----,..-----......-------.-l ~-Inr
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa.::l
O~-AON
o ~-5n'v'
o ~-l\eV\l
o~-uer
60-PO
1------+--------1------!-------+----+------+ 60-lnr
o N
~
o o o CO o CO
(l/6w)
o N o
tn c: 0 ;;
CO ~ .... c:
(1)
0 c: 0
0
(1) .... CO ~ ::: z
~
"'C""" I Z ~
,......---...----..,...---...----.----~---_.__--.....__--__r__--_r_ G ~-Inr
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa.::l
o ~-l\oN
o ~-6nv
o ~-AeV\l
o~-uer
60-PO
1----+----+----+----+---+----+----+----+----+ 60-lnr
L() N N ~ ·0
o
tn c 0
~ '" ~ ....., c CD u c 0
()
CD 'a ";:
0
.c
()
~
~
I Z ~
.-w---..,.-----,------.,...----...,..-----r-------;----r G ~-Inr
~ ~-des
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qe~
O~-AON
o~-6nv
o ~-l\eLAJ
o~-uer
!-----+----+-----!----+----+-----l-----+ 60-lnr
o C")
l!)
N o N o o
(1/6w)
tn c: 0 ;;
CO ~ ...., c:
CD (.) c: 0 U
CD ....,
co ~ ~ Z
it)
or-I Z ~
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa.:l
o ~-J\oN
o~-5nv
o ~-AeV'J
o~-uer
50-PO
1----+----+-----+---+---+---+----+-----+----+ 50-lnr
co o N o o
f/) c 0 .. m s... ..,
C
CI)
(.) c 0 U
CI)
"C "i:
0
J:
U
It)
~
I Z ~
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa.:l
o ~-"oN
o~-5nv
o ~-AeV'J
o ~-uer
60-PO
t-----t---t----t----+---+----t----l----t---+ 60-lnr
o (j) o CO
o CO o N o o
en c 0 .. CO .... .., c
Q)
(J c 0 (.)
Q) .., co .... ::: z
co
"'C""" • Z ~
,-----,----r---,..--.---r----r----,..--.---,----,----r------,-l ~ -Inr
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa.:l
o ~-l\oN
o ~-5nV'
o ~-Aell\l
o~-uer
60-PO
f----+---+---+--~:.---_+----+---+_---I---+---+ 60-lnr
L!)
N
(1/6w)
N L!) o o
tJ) c 0 ;
CO ~ ..... c
CI)
0 c 0 U
CI)
't:J "i:
0
.s::::
U
<0
~ • Z ~
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa.::l
O~-AON
o ~-6n'v'
o ~-Aell\J
o ~-uer
60-PO
f------+-----+----...........f-----+-----+-----\-60-lnr
o <.0 o L.() o ('I')
(1/6w)
o N o o
~ ~-oao
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
en c 0 .. CO L.. .... ~ ~-qa.:J c
CI)
to) c
0 (J
CI) .... o ~-"oN co L.. ~
Z
.......
"t""" • Z o~-5nv ~
o ~-AeV\l
o~-uer
50-PO
1-------+-------+-----+----+------+-----+ 50-lnr
N o co co N o
t/) c:
0 +:i C'O ... .., c: Q)
(.) c:
0 0
Q)
"C "i:
..2
.t: 0
to-
~ • Z ~
,-...,.----r----.,------,----r-----,-----r-"---r Z ~-Inr
~ ~-oao
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa.::l
o ~-l\oN
o~-6nv
o ~ -f\eLA,l
o~-uer
60-PO
!-----+-----+---+-----+---+----+----f----+ 60-lnr
o <0
T"""
o N o o
T"""
o CO o <0 o N
o
tn c 0
+i CO s-... c
Cl)
CJ C 0 (J
Cl) ... CO s-:: z
CO or-• Z ~
~ ~-oaa
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa::J
O~-AON
o~-5nv
o ~-AeV\l
o~-uer
60-PO
!-------+------+---------I------4------+ 60-l nr
L()
N
N o
tn t: 0 ;:; cu ~ ....,
t:
Q)
0 t:
0 U
Q)
" .~
0
~
U
CO or-I
Z ~
,....----r---.-,----r-----r------,----;-----r------. l ~-Inr
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa::J
o ~-"oN
o ~-5nV'
o ~-AeV\J
o~-uer
60-PO
1-----1--------+----4----+---+----4--.....:...---1------1-60-lnr
o CO o <0 o LO o M o N o o
U) c
0 ;:;
CO ~ ...., c Cl)
0
C
0 (J
Cl) ....,
CO ~ ~
Z
0)
~ I
Z ~
,----.--r------r---...,-----r---.,------r------r----.... l ~ -Inr
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa:J
O~-AON
o~-Bnv
o ~-AeV\l
o~-uer
60-PO
f-----+------l----+----l----+------+--------I----+-60-l nr
co <ci C'\I <ci co
tn c 0 ;
'" ~ .... c cu 0 c 0 U
cu
"C "i:
0
.s:: U
0)
~ I Z ~
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa.::l
O~-AON
o~-5nv
o ~-Aell\l
o~-uer
60~PO
1----+---+---+---1-----+---+---+-----1---+---+ 60-lnr
<.0 N
T""
N N
T""
o N
T""
<.0 o ex:> o
T""
<.0 o
T""
~ ~-das
(/)
s::::
0 ;:;
«S ~ ... ~ ~-qa:::l s:::: CI)
(,)
s::::
0 U
CI) ... «S ~ ~
Z 0~-5nv ~
~
CI) ... CI)
E 0 N CI) c::
o~-uer
90-oaa
L() ~ ~ N ~ I'--0'> co I'--<.0 L() "d"
~ I'--I'--I'--~ cO cO cO cO cO cO
(1/6w)
tn E:
0 +i C'a ... ... E: Cl)
(.)
E:
0 U
Cl)
"C .i:
0
.t: U
or-...
Cl) ... Cl)
E 0 N .! c..
...---.-.,.-----.,..---.,.........--.,...---..,...-----r----...,----....,.-----,--l ~-PO
o Q) o 00
o CO o ('f) o N
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa=l
o~-5nv
o~-uer
o
,...------,,...-----r--"----,------,------,-----.,...-----.-l ~-PO
~ ~-das
tJ) c
0 ; ns ~ ~ ~ ~-qa,:j c CP 0 C 0
(J
CP ~ ns ~ :: z o ~-5nV'
N
~ CP ~ CP E 0 N .! a..
o ~-uer
r-------+-------~-------r-------+-------+------~--------+go-~aa
L{) o a
(1/6w)
~ ~-das
U) c 0 ;:::
CO s... ....,
C ~ ~-qa.:l Q)
(,) c 0 U
Q)
"C .t:
0
~ u o ~-6nV'
N
s...
Q) ....,
Q)
E 0 N .!!! a.
o ~-uer
60-lnr
o ex:> N o
t/)
t: 0
+i CO ... ... t:
CD (,)
t: 0 0
CD ... CO ... ~ Z
M ...
CD ... CD E 0 N CD a::
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::J
o~-5nv
o ~-uer
60-lnr
~--~-----+----~----+-----r---~-----+----~----+-----+9o-~aa
C\I co o <0 a C\I a o
-,..-----r----...,..-----..,.------. l ~-PO
~ ~-das
~------+-------+-------~------~-------+-------+-------+go-~aa
o o o CO o CO o N o
tn c: 0 ;;
CO ~ .., c:
CD C.) c: 0
(J
CD ..,
CO ~ ~
Z
~
~
CD ..,
CD E 0 N .! a.
.-------r"'----r----~-___r--__r_--..,...._--r___-_,_--....,_-_r 60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
f----+---!---+----+----l----+-------if----+---+----!-60-lnr
C\I
(1/6w)
<0
o
C\I
o
o
fn
s::::: 0 ;
CO "-,...,
s:::::
CD 0
s::::: 0 (.)
CD
"C . .:
0
.s:::::
(.)
.qo
"-CD ,...,
CD E 0 N .!!! n.
,..------,-----r----,----..,...-----,----r----,----r----r---,-60-lnr
•
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
1------+---+---+---+------li----+---I----+---1----I-60-lnr
o L() o -.:t o C")
L()
N
(1/6w)
o N o o
U)
t:
0 ;;
CO ~ .... t: CD 0 t:
0 ()
CD .... CO ~ ~
Z
it)
~
CD .... CD
E 0 N .!
D..
.------,-----,..-----,.----,..------.------,.----..------.-60-lnr
60-l nr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
I-----I----I-----+----I------+------l----+------+-60-lnr
co o <0 o LC) o N
o
o
U)
C
0
+::i CU ~ ...., c Cl) u c
0 (J
Cl)
"C .i:
0
.J: (J
10
~
Cl) ....,
Cl)
E 0 N .! c..
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
~---+----+----+---+-----l---+---+---+---i---+ 60-lnr
o N o co co N o
0'> o 00
o
co
o
N
o
60-lnr
~~
60-lnr
60-lnr
o
tn t: 0 ; ns s... .... t: CD 0 t: 0
U
CD 'tJ ";:
0
.t:
U
CO
"'C""" • 3:
::2!
..--------,------r-------r-----~---__r_---____r 60-lnr
•
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
f------l-----+------II----------l-----+------I-60-lnr
o CO o L() o N o
U) c 0 ;::; ca '-.....
C
CI)
0 c 0 U
CI) ..... ca '-~
Z
0)
~ • 3:
::2:
..---------..------....----------r'"------.,.---------r 60-lnr
•
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
1--------!--------!-------I---------4-------+ 60-lnr
L.()
N
N L.()
o
o
U)
s:::: 0 +:: CO .... .... s::::
CI)
(,)
s:::: 0
U
CI)
"C "i:
0
.s::::
U
0)
~ • 3:
:?!
,..------,.-----,...------r-----..--------,------. 60-lnr
•
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
I------+----+------I!------+-----+------I-60-lnr
L()
N o N o o
....
CI) c. c. ~
C\I
o
4~ ----------
co o
o
~~
~~
0
----------
~~
----------
~ o o
C\I o
o
....... ,
H
H
0
0
o
~ ~-oaa
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-AON
0~-5nv
o ~-AelJ\l
o~-uer
60-100
r--'----.,....----.,...------r-----r-----.........,.-----r l ~-JdV
~ ~-das
f/)
r:::: ~ ~-unr 0 ;;
CO L.. .... r::::
G)
0 r:::: ~ ~-qa.::J 0 U
G)
"C "i:
0
~ U o ~-J\oN
"C r::::
0 D..
~
"C o~-5nv
§
L..
G)
0.
0.
::J o ~-Aell'J
o~-uer
60-l60
I------!-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ 60-lnr
('I') o
(1/6w)
0>
o
~
LO
o
(1/6w)
~~
o
60-I\ON
60-PO
60-deS
60-deS
60-5nv
60-lnr
f/) c: o ... ns ... .., c: CD (.) c: o
(J
CD "C ".: .2 J: (J
"C c: o a.
C) e
LL
00 o <.0
o
N
o
~.
60-AON
60-PO
60-deS
60-deS
60-BnV
TabL
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Tuesday, August 14, 2012 1 :09 PM
'[e-mail]'
'Phillip Goble'; Thomas Rushing iii; David Frydenlund; Jo Ann Tischler; David Turk; Harold
Roberts; Jaime Massey
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2012 Q2 Nitrate Monitoring
C12041150.CSV
Attached to this e-mail are electronic copies of laboratory results for nitrate monitoring conducted at the White Mesa
Mill during the second quarter of 2012, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
Quality Assurance Manager
1