DRC-2011-007637 - 0901a0688029173a

DENISON
MINES
Sent VIA Federal Express
November 28, 2011
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Co-Executive Secretary
Utah Water Quality Board
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
1050 17th Street, Suite 950
Denver, CO 8026$
USA
Tel: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
www.denisonmlne3.com
Re: Re: Transmittal of 3rd Quarter 2011 Nitrate Monitoring Report
UDEQ Docket No. UGW-09-03 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the
Srd Quarter of 2011 as required by the January 2009 Stipulated Consent Agreement, UDEQ Docket
No. UGW-09-03, as well as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very tioily,
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
Jo Ann Tischler
Director, Compliance and Permitting
CC: Ron F. Hochstein
David C. Frydenlund
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Kathy Weinel
Central Files
OENISOJ)JJ
MINES
Sent VIA Federal Express
November 28, 2011
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Co-Executive Secretary
Utah Water Quality Board
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
1050 17th Street, Suite 950
Denver, CO 80265
USA
Tel: 303628·7798
Fax: [phone]
www.denisonmines.com
Re: Re: Transmittal of 3rd Quarter 2011 Nitrate Monitoring Report
UDEQ Docket No. UGW-09-03 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the
3rd Quarter of 2011 as required by the January 2009 Stipulated Consent Agreement, UDEQ Docket
No. UOW -09-03, as well as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very tru Ly, . ~~~
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
JoAnn Tischler
Director, Compliance and Permitting
CC: Ron F. Hochstein
David C. Frydenlund
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Kathy Weinel
Central Files
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Nitrate Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Stipulated Consent Agreement, January 2009
Docket No. UGW09-03
3rd Quarter
(July through September)
2011
Prepared by:
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
1050 17th Street, Suite 950
Denver CO 80265
November 28, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING ................................................ 1
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ..................................... 1
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring ...................................................................................... 1
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed .................................................................................. 2
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring .................................................. 2
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures ....... 2
2.2.1 Well Purging and Depth to Groundwater ................................................... 3
2.2.2 Sample Collection ....................................................................................... 3
2.3 Field Data ............................................................................................................ 5
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map .............................. 5
2.5 Laboratory Results .............................................................................................. 5
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results ........................................................................ 5
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................... 5
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION ................................... 6
3.1 Field QC Samples ............................................................................................... 6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ..................................................................... 7
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ........................................................................... 7
3.4 Data Validation ................................................................................................... 7
3.4.1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation .................................................................... 7
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................ 8
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ................................................................. 8
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist ...................................................................... 8
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation ........................................................................ 8
3.4.6 QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates ................................................. 9
3.4.7 Rinsate Check ............................................................................................. 9
3.4.8 Other Laboratory QAlQC ........................................................................... 9
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA ......................................................................... 10
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions ........... 10
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map ................................................... 10
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater
Contour Map for Previous Quarter ........................................................... 10
4.1.3 Hydrographs .............................................................................................. 11
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation ................. 11
4.2 Review of Analytical Results ............................................................................ 11
4.2.1 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps ............................... 11
4.2.2 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs .................... 11
4.2.3 Interpretation of Analytical Data .............................................................. 11
5.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ................................................................. 12
5.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions ..................................... 12
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ 12
7.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT .............................................. 13
8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ........................................................... 14
i
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
Table 2 Nitrate Percent Difference
Table 3 Chloride Percent Difference
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-l Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Analytical Method Check
H-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control limits for Analysis and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
II
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Utah Department of Environmental Quality ("UDEQ") Division of Radiation
Control ("DRC") noted in a Request dated Septeniber 30, 2008 (the "Request"), for a
Voluntary Plan and Schedule to Investigate and Remediate Nitrate Contamination at the
White Mesa Uranium Mill (the "Mill") (the "Plan"), that nitrate levels have exceeded the
State water quality standard of 10 mg/L in certain monitoring wells. As a result of the
Request, Denison Mines (USA) Corp. ("DUSA") entered into a Stipulated Consent
Agreement (the "Consent Agreement") with the Utah Water Quality Board in January
2009 which directed the preparation of a Nitrate Contamination Investigation Report
("CIR") and Quarterly Nitrate Monitoring Reports. A subsequent letter dated December
1, 2009, among other things, recommended that DUSA also address elevated chloride
concentration in the Nitrate Monitoring Reports. The Consent Agreement ("CA") was
amended in August 2011. Under the amended Consent Agreement, DUSA will submit a
Corrective Action Plan ("CAP"), pursuant to the requirements of the Utah Groundwater
Quality Protection Rules [UAC R317-6-6.15(C -E)] on or before November 30,2011.
This is the Quarterly Nitrate Monitoring Report, as required under the Consent
Agreement, State of UDEQ Docket No. UGW -09-03 for the third Quarter of 2011.
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing
wells, temporary chloroform contaminant investigation wells and temporary nitrate
investigation wells is attached under Tab A. Nitrate samples and measurements taken
during this reporting period (July through September 2011), are discussed in the
remainder of this section.
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring
Quarterly sampling for nitrate monitoring parameters was performed in the following
wells:
TWN-l
TWN-2
TWN-3
TWN-4
TWN-5
TWN-6
TWN-7
TWN-8
TWN-9
TWN-lO
TWN-11
TWN-12
TWN-13
TWN-14
TWN -15 Piezometer 2
TWN -16 Piezometer 3
TWN-17
TWN-18
TWN-19
Upper Wildlife Pond ("UWLP")
Piezometer 1
Table 1 provides an overview of all locations sampled during the current period, along
with the date samples were collected from each location, and the date(s) upon which
1
N:lRequircd ReportslNitratc Quarterly Monitoring Rcportl2011 Q312011 Q3 Nitrate Report text.docx
analytical data were received from the contract laboratory. Table 1 also identifies rinsate
samples collected, as well as sample numbers associated with any required duplicates.
As indicated in Table 1, nitrate monitoring was performed in all of the nitrate monitoring
wells, the UWLP, and Piezometers 1,2, and 3. Analytical data for all of the nitrate wells,
piezometers and the UWLP are included in Tab G.
Nitrate and chloride are also monitored in all of the Mill's groundwater monitoring wells
and chloroform investigation wells. Data from those wells for the Quarter are
incorporated in certain maps and figures in this report but are discussed in their respective
programmatic reports.
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed
Locations sampled during this reporting period were analyzed for the following
constituents:
• Inorganic Chloride
• Nitrate plus Nitrite as Nitrogen (referred to herein as nitrate)
Use of analytical methods consistent with the requirements of the White Mesa Uranium
Mill Groundwater Quality Assurance Plan, Revision 6, March 22,2010 (the "QAP") was
confirmed for all analytes, as discussed later in this report.
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells and/or piezometers, pursuant
to Part I.E.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permits (the "GWDP") (February 15,
2011 and July 18,2011):
• The quarterly groundwater compliance monitoring wells.
• Existing well MW -4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation wells.
• Piezometers -P-l, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-5.
• MW-20, MW-22, and MW-34
• Nitrate monitoring wells.
• In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in
conjunction with sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and
accelerated efforts, regardless of the sampling purpose.
All well levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded
within 5 calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the
summary sheet under Tab C.
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures
The QAP provides a detailed presentation of procedures utilized for groundwater
sampling activities under the GWDP's (February 15,2011 and July 18,2011).
2
N:IRcquired ReponslNilrale Qu .. terly Moniloring Rcponl2011 Q312011 Q3 Niuale RepOit text.doex
The sampling methodology, equipment and decontamination procedures that were
performed for the nitrate contaminant investigation, as summarized below, are consistent
with the QAP.
2.2.1 Well Purging and Depth to Groundwater
A list of the wells in order of increasing nitrate contamination is generated quarterly. The
order for purging is thus established. The list is included with the Field Data Worksheets
under Tab B. Mill personnel start purging with all of the non-detect wells and then move
to the more contaminated wells in order of nitrate contamination, starting with the wells
having the lowest nitrate contamination.
Before leaving the Mill office, the pump and hose are decontaminated using the cleaning
agents described in Section 6.2.5 of the QAP. A rinsate blank is collected after the first
pump decontamination of each day as described below. Mill personnel then proceed to
the first well which is the well with the lowest concentration of nitrate based on the
previous quarter's sampling results. Well depth measurements are taken and the two
casing volumes are calculated (measurements are made using the same instrument used
for the monitoring wells under the Mill's GWDP). The Grundfos pump (a 6 to 10 gallon
per minute [gpm] pump) is then lowered to the bottom of the well and purging is begun.
At the first well, the purge rate is established for the purging event by using a calibrated 5
gallon bucket. After the evacuation of the well has been completed, the well is sampled
when possible, and the pump is removed from the well and the process is repeated at each
well location moving from the least contaminated to most contaminated well. If sample
collection is not possible due to the well being purged dry a sample is collected after
recovery as described below. All wells are capped and secured prior to leaving the
sampling location.
Decontamination of non-dedicated equipment, using the reagents in Section 6.2.5 of the
QAP, is performed between each sample location, and at the beginning of each sampling
day, in addition to the pre-event decontamination described above.
2.2.2 Sample Collection
Wells
Following the purging of a nitrate investigation well, the sampling takes place once
stabilization has been achieved in accordance with Section 6.2.7 of the QAP. Prior to
leaving the Mill office for sampling, Mill Personnel prepare a cooler with ice. A trip
blank is not required as the sampling event does not include analyses for Volatile Organic
Compounds ("VOCs"). Once Mill Personnel arrive at the well sites, labels are filled out
for the various samples to be collected. All personnel involved with the collection of
water and samples are then outfitted with rubber gloves to avoid sample contamination.
Each sample collection event begins at the location least affected by nitrate (based on the
previous quarter's sampling event) and proceeds by affected concentration to the most
affected location. The dedicated portable pump is appropriately decontaminated prior to
3
N:IRequircd ReporlslNilrale Quarterly Moniloring Reportl2011 Q3120ll Q3 Nilrale Report teXl.docx
each sampling event, each sampling day, and between well samples. It is important to
note that the rinsate blank sample frequency was modified during the fourth quarter 2010
as recommended by UDEQ personnel present on site for split sampling during the
chloroform sampling program. Previously, a rinsate blank sample was collected after
each decontamination of the nondedicated pump and prior to the next use of the pump.
Per an e-mail fromMr.Phil Goble, dated, November 15, 2010, the decreased rinsate
blank frequency implemented during the chloroform sampling program was acceptable
for implementation on the nitrate sampling program. Based on the revised procedure,
rinsate blank samples are only required at the beginning of the sampling event and at the
beginning of each day of sampling. The frequency change was implemented during
fourth quarter 2010.
Samples are taken from the portable pump after stabilization has been achieved, unless
the well is pumped dry. If the well is pumped dry, Mill personnel use a disposable bailer
to sample the well after it has recovered in accordance with Section 6.2.7 of the QAP.
The bailer is attached to a reel of approximately 150 feet of nylon rope and then lowered
into the well. After coming into contact with the water, the bailer is allowed to sink into
the water in order to fill. Once full, the bailer is reeled up out of the well.
Sample bottles are filled as follows:
• First, a 250 ml sample is collected for nitrate/nitrite. This sample is not filtered,
but is preserved with H2S04.
• Second, a 500 ml sample is collected for chloride. This sample is not filtered and
is not chemically preserved.
After the samples have been collected for a particular well, the samples are placed into
the cooler that contains ice. The well is then recapped and Mill personnel proceed to the
next well. If a bailer has been used it is disposed of.
Ponds
Grab samples are taken from the UWLP using a disposable bailer. Sample bottles are
filled in the same manner as for wells, as stated above. After the samples are collected,
the bailer is disposed of and samples are placed into a cooler containing ice for sample
preservation and transit to the Mill's contract analytical laboratory, Energy Laboratories
("EL").
Piezometers
Samples are collected from Piezometers 1, 2 and 3, if possible. Samples are collected
from piezometers using a disposable bailer following the procedures described for wells
that have been pumped dry, above. However, due to the difficulty in obtaining samples
from the piezometers, the purging protocols set out in the QAP are not followed.
4
N:\Required ReportslNitrate Quarterly Monitoring Reportl20 II Q312011 Q3 Nitrate Report tcxt.docx
After samples are collected, the bailer is disposed of and samples are placed into a cooler
containing ice for sample preservation and transit to the Mill's contract analytical
laboratory, EL.
2.3 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all Field Data Worksheets that were completed
during the quarter for the nitrate contaminant investigation monitoring wells,
piezometers, and UWLP identified in Section 2.1.1 above, and Table 1. It is important to
note that the field data sheet appearance was changed in the fourth quarter 2010 as a
result of the implementation of an electronic data capture system. The field data sheets
contain the same information as the approved field data sheet attached to the approved
QAP in approximately the same location. The new data sheets allow the electronic
capture of data while still maintaining the real-time recording of information manually in
ink as required by UDEQ. The changes were made to accommodate the data recording
and validation system.
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map
Depth-to-groundwater measurements which were utilized for groundwater contours are
included on the Quarterly Depth to Water Sheet at Tab C of this Report along with the
kriged groundwater contour map for the current quarter generated from this data. All
well levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5
calendar days of each as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet under
Tab C. A copy of the kriged groundwater contour map generated from the previous
quarter's data is provided under Tab D.
2.5 Laboratory Results
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
All analytical results were provided by EL. Table 1 lists the dates when analytical results
were reported to the Quality Assurance ("QA") Manager for each well or other sample.
Results from analysis of samples collected for the third Quarter nitrate investigation are
provided under Tab G of this Report. Also included under Tab G are the results of
anal yses for duplicate samples and rinsate samples for this sampling effort, as identified
in Table 1. See the Groundwater Monitoring Report and Chloroform Monitoring Report
for the third Quarter of 2011 for nitrate and chloroform analytical results for the
groundwater monitoring wells and chloroform investigation wells not listed in Table 1.
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework
As discussed in Section 1.0 above, the Request, Plan, and Consent Agreement each
triggered a series of actions on DUSA's part. Potential surficial sources of nitrate and
chloride have been described in the December 30, 2009 CIR and additional investigations
into potential sources were completed. Pursuant to the Consent Agreement, a CAP will
5
N:IRequired RcportslNilrate Quarterly Monitoring Reportl20ll Q3120ll Q3 Nitrate Report text.docx
be submitted to the Co-Executive Secretary on or before November 30, 2011. The CAP
will describe future activities associated with the nitrate in groundwater. This quarterly
report documents the continued monitoring consistent with the program described in the
initial Nitrate Contamination Investigation Report submitted in 2009. The monitoring
program and reporting requirements set forth in the 2009 Contamination Investigation
report will remain in effect until further notice and completion of the CAP.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION
The Mill QA Manager performed a QNQC review to confirm compliance of the
monitoring program with requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA
includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures,
an analyte completeness review, and QC review of laboratory data methods and data.
Identification of field QC samples collected and analyzed is provided in Section 3.1.
Discussion of adherence to Mill sampling Standard Operating Procedures ("SOPs") is
provided in Section 3.2. Analytical completeness review results are provided in Section
3.3. The steps and tests applied to check field data QNQC, holding times, receipt
temperature and laboratory data QNQC are discussed in Sections 3.4.1 through 3.4.7
below.
The analytical laboratory has provided summary reports of the analytical QNQC
measurements necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental
Laboratory Accreditation Conference ("NELAC") certification and reporting protocol.
The Analytical Laboratory QNQC Summary Reports, including copies of the Mill's
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record forms for each set of Analytical
Results, follow the analytical results under Tab G. Results of review of the laboratory
QNQC information are provided under Tab H and discussed in Section 3.4, below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the
anal ytical laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field
sampling program.
Field QC samples for the nitrate investigation program consist of one field duplicate
sample for each 20 samples, one DI Field Blank ("DIPB") and equipment rinsate
samples.
During the quarter, two duplicate samples were collected as indicated in Table 1. The
duplicates were sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same
parameters as the nitrate wells.
Rinsate samples were also collected at the beginning of the sampling period and at the
beginning of each day of sampling from the decontaminated pump used for purging and
sampling. Rinsate samples were labeled with the name of the subsequently sampled well
with a terminal letter "R" added (e.g. TWN-7R). The results of these analyses are
included with the routine analyses under Tab G.
6
N:\Required ReportslNilratC Quarterly Monitoring Rep0l1120 II Q3120 II Q3 Nilrate Report leXl.do<x
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the existing sampling SOPs, the QA
Manager observed that QAlQC requirements established in the QAP were being adhered
to and that the SOPs were implemented, except as noted below.
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for nitrate monitoring for the period were performed.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAP and GWDP's (February 15, 201 land July 18, 2011) identify the data validation
steps and data QC checks required for the nitrate monitoring program. Consistent with
these requirements, the QA Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data
QAlQC evaluation, a holding time evaluation, an analytical method check, a reporting
limit evaluation, a QC evaluation of sample duplicates, a QC evaluation of control limits
for analysis and blanks, a receipt temperature evaluation, and a rinsate evaluation.
Because no VOCs are analyzed for the nitrate contamination investigation, no trip blanks
are required in the sampling program. Each evaluation is discussed in the following
sections. Data check tables indicating the results of each test are provided under Tab H.
3.4.1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their
adherence with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of
information: the Field Data Sheets and the Quarterly Depth to Water summary sheet.
Review of the Field Data Sheets addresses well purging volumes and stability of five
parameters: conductance, pH, temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Review of the
Depth to Water data confirms that all depth measurements used for development of
groundwater contour maps were conducted within a five-day period of each other. The
results of this quarter's review are provided under Tab H.
Based upon this review, all well locations conformed to the QAP requirement to evacuate
two well casing volumes before sampling except TWN-2, TWN-3, TWN-7, TWN-9,
TWN-I4, TWN-I5, and TWN-17. These seven wells were all pumped to dryness before
two casing volumes were evacuated and more than one set of field parameters could be
collected. In each case, representative samples of formation water were collected after
the wells were allowed to recover. Piezometers 1, 2, and 3 were not pumped, and were
sampled directly after measurement of one set of parameters. Two casing volumes were
pumped from TWN-I0 before it was purged to dryness.
During review of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel
consistently recorded depth to water for the quarterly sampling programs to the nearest
0.01 foot.
7
N:lRequircd Repo,tslNitrate Quarterly MOnitoring Report\20 II Q3\20 II Q3 Nitrate Repon text.doex
All field parameters for all wells were within the QAP required limits, as indicated
below.
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP requirements resulted in the
observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Section 6.2.7 specifically state that
field parameters must have stabilized to within 10% over at least 2 consecutive
measurements. The QAP states that turbidity should be less than 5 Nephelometric
Turbidity Units ("NTU") prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that
has a higher turbidity. The QAP does not require that turbidity measurements be less
than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such, the noted observations regarding turbidity
measurements less than 5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• Sixteen well measurements and the measurements from Piezometers 2, and 3
exceeded the QAP's 5 NTU turbidity goal as noted in Tab H. All turbidity RPD's
met the QAP Requirement to stabilize within 10%.
DUSA's letter to DRC of March 26,2010 discusses further why turbidity does not appear
to be an appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to DRC's
subsequent correspondence dated June 1, 2010 and June 24, 2010, DUSA has completed
a monitoring well redevelopment program. The redevelopment report was submitted to
DRC on September 30, 2011. Redevelopment results will be discussed with DRC in an
effort to come to a consensus regarding turbidity considerations for the nitrate wells at the
Mill site.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample
holding time checks are provided in Tab H. All samples were received and analyzed
within the required holding time.
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement
in QAP Table 1 that samples be received at 6°C or lower. Sample temperatures checks
are provided in Tab H. All samples were received within the required temperature limit.
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by the laboratory were checked against the required
methods enumerated in the QAP. Analytical method checks are provided in Tab H. All
methods were consistent with the requirements of the QAP.
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits reported by the laboratory were checked against
the reporting limits enumerated in the QAP. Reporting Limit Checks are provided in Tab
H. All analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting limits, with the
exception of six samples that had increased reporting limits due to matrix interference or
8
N:IRequired Report,INi"ate Quarterly Monitoring Reponl20 II Q3120 II Q3 Nitrate Repon text.docx
required dilution due to the sample concentration. However, in all of those cases the
analytical results were greater than the reporting limit used.
3.4.6 QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of
duplicate and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the
duplicate and original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured
results (described as activities in the QAP) are less than 5 times the required detection
limit. This standard is based on the EPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-01 as cited
in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for all duplicate pairs for all analytes regardless of
whether or not the reported concentrations are greater than 5 times the required detection
limits. However, data will be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater
than 5 times the required detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%. The additional
duplicate information is provided for information purposes.
All duplicate results were within a 20% RPD. Results of the RPD test are provided in Tab
H.
3.4.7 Rinsate Check
Rinsate checks are provided in Tab H.
None of the three rinsate blanks collected reported concentrations of nitrate. A DIFB was
analyzed and was reported as nondetect for all analytes.
3.4.8 Other Laboratory QAlQC
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QNQC Manager check the
following items in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct
and complete, (2) analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate Analytical
Laboratory procedures are followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5)
QC samples are within established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7)
special sample preparation and analytical requirements have been met, and (8)
documentation is complete. In addition to other laboratory checks described above,
DUSA's QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items (5) and (6» to confirm
that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for spike
duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative
sufficiently explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check
are provided in Tab H.
All lab QNQC results met these specified acceptance limits except as noted below.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that an MS/MSD (referred to as Duplicate Spike [Matrix
spike] in the QAP) pair be analyzed with each analytical batch. The QAP does not
9
N:lRequired ReportslNitrate Quartetly MonitOring Reportl20 II Q3120 II Q3 Nitrate Report text.docx
specify acceptance limits for the MSIMSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the
MSIMSD pair be prepared on DUSA samples only. Acceptance limits for MSIMSDs are
set by the laboratories. The review of the information provided by the laboratories in the
data packages verified that the QAP requirement to analyze an MSIMSD pair with each
analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not require it, the recoveries were
reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established acceptance limits. The QAP
does not require this level of review, and the results of this review are provided for
information only.
The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the
MSIMSDs recoveries and the associated RPDs for all quarterly nitrate samples are within
acceptable laboratory limits for all regulated compounds except as indicated in Tab H.
The recovery, which is below the laboratory established acceptance limits, does not affect
the quality or usability of the data because matrix spike recoveries outside of acceptance
limits are indicative of matrix interference rather than an analytical problem. The LCS
recoveries were acceptable which indicate that the analytical system was operating
properly. The QAP requirement to analyze a MSIMSD pair with each analytical batch
was met and as such the data are compliant with the QAP.
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions.
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the current quarter (shown as
depth to groundwater in feet) is included under Tab C. The data from this tab has been
interpreted (kriged) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under the same
tab. The contour map is based on the September 20, 2011 data for all wells.
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater
Contour Map for Previous Quarter
The groundwater contour maps for the Mill site for the second quarter of 2011, as
submitted with the Nitrate Monitoring Report for the second quarter of 2011, are attached
under Tab D.
A comparison of the water table contour maps for the third quarter of 2011 to the water
table contour maps for the previous quarter (second quarter of 2011) indicates similar
patterns of drawdown related to pumping ofMW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19 and TW4-
20. Water levels and water level contours for the site have not changed significantly
since the last quarter, except for a few locations. As discussed in Section 4.1.1, pumping
at TW4-4, which began in the first quarter of 2010, has depressed the water table near
TW4-4, but does not yet appear to have affected water levels at adjacent wells
sufficiently for a well-defined cone of depression to be evident.
10
N:IRequired Rep0rlslNitrate Quarterly Monitoring RepOl112011 Q312011 Q3 Nitrate Report text.docx
Reported increases in water levels of approximately 6 feet occurred in new well MW-37,
and of approximately 14 feet in pumping well MW-26. Reported decreases in water
levels of approximately 7 feet occurred in well TW4-3, of approximately 6 feet occurred
in MW-4, and of approximately 28 feet occurred in pumping well TW4-20. The water
level changes at the remaining pumping wells (TW 4-4 and TW 4-19) were less than 5
feet.
Water level fluctuations at pumping wells MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-
20 are due in part to fluctuations in pumping conditions just prior to and at the time the
measurements are taken. The largest decrease (increase in draw down) of approximately
28 feet occurred in well TW4-20 and the largest increase (decrease in drawdown), of
approximately 14 feet, occurred at MW-26. The reported water level increase of 6 feet at
new well MW-37 during the current quarter is likely due to recovery after development
during the previous quarter. The reported decrease in water level of approximately 7 feet
at TW4-3 yields a water level that is similar to historical values suggesting the previous
reading (second quarter, 2011 reading) was anomolous.
4.1.3 Hydrographs
Attached under Tab E are hydro graphs showing groundwater elevation in each nitrate
contaminant investigation monitor well over time.
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation
Attached in Tab F are tables showing depth to groundwater measured and groundwater
elevation over time for each of the wells listed in Section 2.1.1 above.
4.2 Review of Analytical Results
4.2.1 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Included under Tab I of this Report are current nitrate and chloride iso-concentration
maps for the Mill site. Nitrate iso-contours start at 5 mg/L and chloride iso-contours start
at 100 mg/L because those values appear to separate the plumes from background. All
nitrate and chloride data used to develop these iso-concentration maps are from the
second quarter 2011 sampling events.
4.2.2 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs
Attached under Tab J is a table summarizing values for nitrate and chloride for each well
over time. Some data (MW-18, MW-19 and the Frog Pond) were not sampled this period
but the historical data are included for information purposes.
Attached under Tab K are graphs showing nitrate and chloride concentration trends in
each monitor well over time.
4.2.3 Interpretation of Analytical Data
11
N:IRequired ReporlslNilrate Quartelly Moniloring Reportl2011 Q3120 11 Q3 Nitrale Report teXl.docx
Generally, the shapes of the nitrate and chloride plumes appear to be stable and
unchanged for the last seven quarters. The nitrate and chloride plumes maintain their
general geographic association and it is still possible to separate the plumes into a
segment northeast of the wildlife ponds and a southwest segment near the mill site.
Nitrate and chloride concentrations in samples from the downgradient edge of the plumes
(in the vicinity of tailings impoundment monitoring wells MW-30 and MW-31) have
remained essentially unchanged (current concentration within one standard deviation of
the average of the previous six quarters and within laboratory variation) and the plume
does not appear to be migrating in the down gradient direction. In general, both nitrate
and chloride concentrations in nitrate monitoring wells are similar to values from last
quarter or have declined (Tables 2 and 3).
Notable exceptions include chloride concentrations in Piezometer 3 which rose from 35
mg/L to 61 mg/L, chloride concentrations in TWN-4 which rose from 21 mg/L to 35
mg/L, chloride concentrations in TWN-8 which rose from 10 mg/L to 18 mg/L, and
nitrate concentrations in TWN-16 which rose from 1.6 mg/L to 2.4 mg/L (Tables 2 and
3). The chloride concentration in Piezometer 3 has been as high as 116 mg/L (l st Quarter
2010). The nitrate concentration in samples from TWN-I0 which rose from 0.3 mg/L in
the first quarter of 2011 to 1.2 mg/L in the second quarter of 2011 have fallen to 0.1 mg/L
during the third quarter of 2011 (as noted in Table 2 and in Tab K). The range of
concentrations of nitrate in samples from this well during the last eight quarters is 0.1 to
1.5 mg/L (Table 2). The current quarter's data continue to support the conclusion in the
Nitrate Contamination Investigation Report that the nitrate and chloride are co-extensive
and appear to originally come from the same source.
5.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
There are no corrective actions resulting from third quarter 2011 Nitrate sampling event.
5.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions
The second quarter 2011 report identified a corrective action for low level nitrate
contamination in the rinsate blanks.
An investigation into the low level nitrate concentrations in the second quarter of 2011 by
the QA Manager was completed. A second Dr water rinse was added to the
decontamination process to eliminate the low level nitrate contamination. Addition of the
second Dr rinse was implemented for the chloroform program in the third quarter 2011.
The results were successful in eliminating the nitrate contamination. This addition to the
rinsate process was implemented in the nitrate program during the third quarter sampling
event and there were no detections of nitrate in any of the third quarter nitrate program
rinsate blanks.
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Generally, the shapes of the nitrate and chloride plumes appear to be stable and
unchanged for the last seven quarters. The nitrate and chloride plumes maintain their
12
N:lRequircd ReportslNitrate Quarterly Monitoring Rep0l112011 Q312011 Q3 Nitrale Reporllcxt.docx
general geographic association and it is still possible to separate the plumes into a
segment northeast of the wildlife ponds and a southwest segment near the mill site.
Nitrate and chloride concentrations in samples from the downgradient edge of the plumes
(in the vicinity of tailings impoundment monitoring wells MW-30 and MW-31) have
remained essentially unchanged (current concentration within one standard deviation of
the average of the previous six quarters and within laboratory variation) and the plume
does not appear to be migrating in the downgradient direction. In general, both nitrate
and chloride concentrations in nitrate monitoring wells are similar to values from last
quarter or have declined (Tables 2 and 3).
The current quarter's data continue to support the conclusion in the Nitrate
Contamination Investigation Report that the nitrate and chloride are co-extensive and
appear to originally come from the same source.
7.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
DUSA has provided to the Co-Executive Secretary an electronic copy of all laboratory
results for groundwater quality monitoring conducted under the nitrate contaminant
investigation during the Quarter, in Comma Separated Values ("CSV") format. A copy
of the transmittal e-mail is included under Tab L.
13
N:IRequired ReporlslNitrate Quarterly Monitoring Reportl20 II Q3120 II Q3 Nitrale Report texLdocx
8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Denison Mines (USA) Corp. on November 28, 2011.
and Coun el
14
N:IRC<juircll RCJlOr~ illU1C I./tlllnerly Moniloring 1(0(1<1"\2011 Q31201 1 03 NIlIlIIC Rcl'ClIt Icxl.tlll<:t
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that thi s document and all attachments were
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the in formation submilted.
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system , or those persons
directly responsible for gatherin g the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my kn owledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware th at there are
significan pen ties for submitting false in formation, including the possibility of fine and
r knowing violations.
ydenlund
Vice resi ent, Regulatory Affairs and Counsel
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
15
Tables
Table 1
Summary of We]] Sampling and Constituents for the Period
We]] Sample Co]]ectionDate Date of Lab Report
Piezometer 1 7/25/2011
Piezometer 2 7/25/2011
Piezometer 3 7/25/2011
TWN-l 7/26/2011
TWN-2 7/2812011
TWN-3 7/29/2011
TWN-4 7126/2011
TWN-5 7/26/2011
TWN-6 7/27/2011
TWN-7 7/2912011
TWN-7R 7/2812011
TWN-8 7/26/2011
TWN-8R 7/26/2011
TWN-9 7129/2011
TWN-lO 7127/2011
TWN-l1 7/27/2011
TWN-lIR 7127/2011
TWN-12 7/26/2011
TWN-13 7/26/2011
TWN-14 7/29/2011
TWN-15 7/28/2011
TWN-16 7/27/2011
TWN-17 712912011
TWN-18 7/28/2011
TWN-19 7/28/2011
TWN-65 7126/2011
TWN-60 8/1/2011
TWN-70 7/29/2011
UWLP 7/25/2011
Note: All wells were sampled for Nitrate and Chloride
TWN-60 is a DI Field Blank
TWN-65 is a duplicate of TWN-13, and TWN-70 is a duplicate of TWN-7.
UWLP is a sample from the Upper Wildlife Pond
8/212011
8/212011
8/212011
8/212011
8/212011
8/212011
8/2/2011
8/212011
8/212011
8/212011
81212011
8/212011
8/212011
8/2/2011
8/2/2011
8/212011
8/2/2011
8/212011
8/212011
8/212011
8/212011
8/212011
8/2/2011
8/212011
812/2011
8/2/2011
8/212011
8/212011
8/212011
-
'4th Q lstQ Location 2009 2010
Piez 1 NA NA
Piez 2 NA NA
Piez 3 NA 1.7
TWNI 0.5 0.5
TWN2 20.8 62.1
TWN3 29 25.3
TWN4 0.4 0.9
TWN5 0.2 0.3
TWN6 1.4 1.5
TWN7 0.1 0.8
TWN8 0.1 <0.1
TWN9 12 7.6
TWNlO 1.4 1.5
TWNll 1.3 1.4
TWN12 0.5 0.7
TWN13 0.5 0.1
TWN14 3.4 2.9
TWN15 1.1 0.7
TWN16 1 1.2
TWN17 6.7 10.4
TWN 18 1.3 1.6
TWN19 7.4 7.2
Red value indicates nondetect
2ndQ
2010
7.2
0.6
1.6
0.6
69
26
1
0.3
1.4
1.2
<0.1
7.7
1
1.3
0.8
0.1
2.9
1
1.3
11
1.8
6.2
Table 2
Nitrate (mgIL)
3rdQ 4tbQ
2010 2010
6.8 6.5
0.6 0.2
1.8 1.8
0.6 0.6
69 48
27 24
0.9 1.0
0.3 0.3
1.4 1.2
1.6 1.0
<0.1 <0.1
10.7 8
0.2 1.3
1.4 1.4
0.7 0.7
0.2 0.4
3.5 4.2
1 1.2
2.6 2
8.9 8
1.8 1.6
7.2 7
lstQ 2ndQ JrdQ % Difference 2nd
20U 2011 2011 Q 2011 an~ lrd Q
20U
7 6.8 7 3
0.3 0.3 0.1 -200
1.8 1.7 1.8 6
0.5 0.5 0.5 0
43 40 33 -21
24 26 25 -4
0.9 0.9 1.1 18
0.4 0.3 0.3 0
1.1 1.5 1.1 -36
1.3 1.7 0.7 -143
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0
9.5 10 11 9
0.3 1.2 0.1 -1100
1.4 1.4 0.1 -1300 I
4.2 1 0.6 -67
1.6 <0.1 <0.1 0
3.7 3.5 3.5 0
1.4 1.6 1.6 0
4.6 1.6 2.4 33
8.6 9 8.5 -6
1.4 1.8 1.8 0
7 6.9 7.1 3
4thQ lstQ Location 2009 2010
Piez 1 NA NA
Piez 2 NA NA
Piez 3 NA 116
TWNI 18 17
TWN2 55 85
TWN3 106 111
TWN4 11 22
TWN5 48 43
TWN6 21 19
TWN7 7 6
TWN8 12 11
TWN9 205 183
TWNI0 26 54
TWN 11 74 73
TWN 12 109 113
TWN13 83 47
TWN 14 32 24
TWN 15 78 43
TWN16 39 35
TWN 17 152 78
TWN 18 57 42
TWN19 125 118
2ndQ
2010
52
8
36
20
97
118
22
44
22
6
11
175
30
72
106
49
30
39
35
87
63
113
Table 3
Chloride (mgIL)
3rdQ 4thQ
2010 2010
52 60
8 6
35 25
19 14
104 93
106 117
19 21
43 45
73 21
7 4
11 9
210 172
21 28
76 72
112 103
53 57
26 28
36 38
35 30
66 65
64 59
113 107
I
IstQ 2ndQ 3rdQ % Difference I
2nd Q 2011 and I 2011 2011 2011 3rd Q2011 I
I
60 58 53 -9
9 8 9 11
40 35 61 43
17 19 14 -36
93 85 74 -15
138 128 134 4
21 21 35 40
47 44 44 0
18 22 17 -29
6 6 5 -20
13 10 18 44
217 192 208 8
40 28 28 0
84 76 76 0
87 109 102 -7
103 49 49 0
24 30 25 -20
43 49 47 -4
34 39 31 -26
90 81 74 -9
61 67 65 -3
114 120 113 -6
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
o
MW-20
;{
v .r
/,I "
"
,\
\ ~II
1,
[' II
II
II
\' 32 1\
\'
\' II
\1
II
II
I' ,I
,I
\ .~.21
II
II
II
\\ ~ ~
N ~ ~
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATION
• perched monitoring well
TW4-19
~
o temporary perched monitoring well
PIEZ-1 g
TWN-1
()
MW-34
-¢-
MW-36
~
perched piezometer
temporary perched nitrate
monitoring well
perched monitoring well installed
August/September, 2010
perched monitoring well
installed April, 2011
MW-G2 •
MW-~5 9,
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
l
II
II
(t
-..:::-
MW\ h MW~3 ____ MW-34 M~-
<> 9-l:t-•
~
MW-03 •
MW-20 •
MW-37
II
II
II
II
II
II
II r
CELL NO.1
MW-G1 •
~5
o TWN-7
MW-27 •
CELL NO.2
MW-17 •
33
MW-18 •
o TWN-18
o TWN-3
o TWN-6
o TWN-8
~ TWN-15
o TWN-10
~ TWN-9
PIEZ-1
"
MW-19 •
PIEZ-2
II
t~f
PIEZ-3
II
OTW4-1IbTW4-11 OTW4-13
TW4-7~-8
OTW4-1
OTW4-40TW4_14
TW4-23 OTW4-6 o
OTW4-26
~ TWN-11
~ TWN-14
PIEZ-4 /k.::=:-=:--h?' -.=--=--II
*
h/7
7
PIEZ-5
"
T37S
T388
o
~~ --=---...:::~-=--=--~.
/,I ~-=-~~~-=-4--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=-7! ~~ 4' N-----t'
----.
3000
sf
"'--:::::-
wildlife pond
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC. APPROVED
SJS
MW-2.2 • 1/
,#
#
#
#
#
4
4
#
#
,#
SITE PLAN
AND PERCHED WELL LOCATIONS
WHITE MESA SITE
DATE REFERENCE
H :I718000/nov11 Iwelloc11 .srf
~ ~ c
(
~
~
FIGURE
A-1
,
~
7
TabB
Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
0
Nitrate MilL
3rJ. Nitrate Order
A:St Quarter 2011
Nitrate samples
Name Previous Qrt. Date/Purge sample Depth Total Depth
TWN-8 NO 171:u.111 o f)/~3 1..1 '-:.1 145.5
TWN-13 NO 1 7/~nl o Dg;tY y'-.,lO 120
lWN·S 0_3 ; j'J..{.Jll o OQ11 G:,'t_77 150
lWN-l 0_5 71""1' o ~"l."; 50.51 112_S
TWN-4 0_9 'r1/~J 1/ o .,I4t ~·,S 12S.7
TWN-12 1.0 1-rlWII o 1!l..J1. ~1. 10 110
TWN-I0~ 1_2 11/2'lJ II 00"-5 gl.~ 105
TWN-11 1_4 17''''/ II o '~I b'tSI 142
,
TWN-6 1.5 ~a"/" o ,~" 7'C,Sfs 130
TWN-16 1.6 ., 1!J..'1111 o I~ "t~.ot> 100
TWN-15 1.6 7 /{).$1/1 0 0 "':;2.. \ Q)..3D 155
TWN-7 1_7 7 /~qll l o 1015 8S -Sb 105
TWN-18 1.8 7/:)'f1 J j' o OK:J..Cj ~7 ~I 145
TWN-14 3.5 17 /.:tq j II 0 lo 4l ~8(, 135
TWN-19 6.9 l-r I .2.1(/ /l o l' 'II ~~ ~1 110
TWN·17 9_0 "1 /~'t I il o ID5 1 3 t.J_5 8 110
TWN-9 10_0 •. iQfilll 0 iO"3, "-_'l.bS 97
TWN·3 26.0 ~I :;"\j JI o 1030 ~;2.,OO 96
TWN-2 40.0 -,1-).f!..1 I, o 1"IJ.1 96
Piez 1 6.8 in 01
Pfez2 0.3
Piez 3 1.7
wildlife NO
TWN . ,S 7flG./JI Oll'l~
TWAJ-70 7/1.1/11 10 15
TWN (,0 ~J 1/ /I ogY.5
Rinsate Samples
Name Date Sample
TWN-SR ., I 'J...t-./II {)t4.C
TWN-13R
TWN·5R
TWN·IR
TWN--4R
TWN·12R
TWN·I0R
TWN-llR 1-u~"UIJ 1:l()9
TWN-6R
TWN-l6R
TWN-lSR
TWN-7R 7 '~/I! 010!>
TWN-18R
TWN·14R
TWN-19R
TWN-17R
TWN·9R
TWN-3R
TWN-2R
Samplers: ~acc Ho}J.ch.1
tf.",.r ... Pc, /""fC
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1
OENlsoNI)A ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ", See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I '31'11< Q\ACA.rf~; Ji)"tr~+e ;rOIl
Location (well name):IL...-r_W_AJ_-_I _________ --..I
Sampler Name
and initials: I==t.nn .. r FJolI:J~ /-rtf
Date and Time for Purgil1~ -, /;)...(.I:;.D II and Sampling (if different) J .'
Well Purging Equip Used: rn:] pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event IQ~rhrG1 tV .tro.f(. Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I"'-WAJ-.5 L--_________ ~
pH Buffer 7.0 7-D pH Buffer 4.0 y.O
Specific Conductance .... l _tl_q_q ___ --'I/lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I J J';l..Sb
Depth to Water Before Pl.lrgin~ 50 ·51 Casing Volume (V) 4" Wen:1 ~o.'-\7 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h)
'-------'
Conductance (avg) 78:1.. pH of Water (avg) '-----------~----~
Well Water Temp. (avg) 15. \q Redox Potential (Eh)1 ;;t q':l Turbidity I 13 _ ()
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)l."llo
Time I lo~ 1 Gal. Purged 1 ,0 1 Time 1 ID~3 1 Gal. Purged 1 gtJ 1
Conductance 1 '1 ~~.~ 1 pH I 1.3~ 1 Conductance I'~~· , 1 pH 17.3& 1
Temp.oC I ,5.'1;:> I Temp.oC 1 15. \.=, I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ?-Oir.; I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ?:.~~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I 1').1 I Turbidity (NTU) I IS.U I
Time I I Dd-.\j I Gal. Purged I t\O I Time I JD2-5 I Gal. Purged I 100 I
Conductance I 1 'b~., I pH I J '21 I Conductance 175;:)...0 I pH li.3'i 1
Temp.oC I \S. \'5 I Temp.oC 1 15.19 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ,).0,';)... I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~g I
Turbidity (NTU) 11~.9 1 Turbidity (NTU) 113.1 1
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Gro'undwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 11....-_1 O_O ___ --l
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L-I --.!.I_U __ -l
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 KO&( I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL.._.tV_I....;A.'--_____ ---'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients rn 0 100mi 0 rn H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 RN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 RN03 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 rg 0
C '" \DrI'4G If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
Arr,\)eJ Cln s.rt(. ~+ JOlt. ~nt)(,""a.nJ G-o.rf',n rres<-t?+...Jdr ?u\je GfntA StA,lYJpl:::y €vet?-f.
Pur~e.. .b~fl Clot \()IS, f\(~e~ v.)ell for o...1-otc..\ rf' 10 "tT1U.t~s, ~tA.+el" wu,S cJ-eCt(.
'PL\(~<'. en~e~ ~(lt\ S6.Vlplc.~ lUcre co!Jc.c+c.J fAr }D~5.
D ~ pf\.-to \':)'c"h r "'--A-c( P"'t j< w~s 71. 3'3 L -c~ Srk d ) 03 ~ "
'--________ ...... IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 OENISOn~~: WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ".. See instmction
MINES 'FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ?,rzl Qv.().r:tcr 1'-':+r~f'C.. a:DJ I
~----------------------------------------------------~
Location (well name ):11-__ f_w_JJ __ -~ ________________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: I-rAMU Hol1 :a".j hI}
Date and Time for Purging/ 1/::J....S/1J,JJ II and Sampling (if different) .... 1 _".,J_li_A __________ -'
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IGTl.A,,~to..s,
Sampling Event l0\¥\o.r+a/.:1 A);t(Dlh. l-rvJAJ -3 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L--____________ --I
pH Buffer 7.0 -',0 pH Buffer 4.0 t.-Lo
Specific ConductancelL-_Gl_'i_q ___ ....J1 f,tMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 q b .00
Depth to Water Before Purginm n. ;5 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 Sl .~ 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '---------I
Conductance (avg) ~~II pH of Water (avg) 1-1 ....:::b~.5=..!.t.j _____ ....J
Well Water Temp. (avg) 11 (".31 Redox Potential (Eh) I 3 g (,. Turbidity 1 1~-'3 '------'-'--'-------I
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp .• ( (prior sampling eventll;lS»
Time 11L\O:3 1 Gal. Purged 111 I Time 1 I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 1;2.6:11 I pH I G,SC/ I Conductance 1 I pH 1 I
Temp. DC lIb ·31 I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I r~SC; I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 1~-5 I Turbidity (NTU) 1 J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1L-7u.1 ____ -l gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (0), in gpm. Time to evacuate two ca jog volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1-1 -.;..\ 1 ___ --l T=2V/Q= 19 .31 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) Il.3Z
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1 71
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labl .... _.N_Y,_~ ______ -----'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 129 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 :El 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) l:J 0 Sample volume 0 r:J 0 ~
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
1.-________ ~IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1
OE N ISON') WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL "., See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13'c:A Q""o.rkr }J:+ro.f", ~Oll
Location (well name): .....
_l_W_iJ_-_'3 ________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: I~Me,..Ro 11;;,\\".::1 /-nJ
Date and Time for Purging/'-/,_V._~_6_1_:J-_D_' ' ____ ----' and Sampling (if different) L-1'_I_{).:_q;.....I_d._O_l/ ____ -'
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I &"1'\)'" )+o~
Sampling Event IQv..(.I.r+cr~ ;Vi'trl.\f., Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-1~_~_)J_-_4 _____ -"
pH Buffer 7.0 70 pH Buffer 4.0 q,o
Specific Conductance LI_9_1_~ ___ __'I!-lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I ~ ". 00
Depth to Water Before PUl-gin~ 3:J..OO 4" well:I~I-74 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '-------'
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I H::·I!) Redox Potential (Eh) I s 7 b Turbidity 1,-s._~_·_J _----'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 MI>
Time 11~IO I Gal. Purged I LIS I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ?.4SS I pH I b.83 I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC 116. )5 I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I "f.,7~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I S~. ~ I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged L-I _Y_1 ____ --.J gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = ___ I _ll __ ----J
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 1-1·:5Q I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 L J?--
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1 9i
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L-....:;N.:.......:./1-,-1 ______ --I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 mJ 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250mJ 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 mJ 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) E 0 Sample volume 0 n 0 ~
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
Au·;veJ.. On !.;+~ Co.} )'30~. -r;,.n<.r do-",J. &o..a ;11 pr~jt:n+ ..Cor purj<= 6-tlJ $~"'lf):~~ e\l~rrt. P"'r,,~-e. b~a'J
.?\..} J3D{". ?v..r!:JeA well .ror 0.. ·h+iI\\ o-f L) M:nv.+~ 6."tA :2.0 ~e.cc>~c15.. ~r~ed u.)e/I dr~l.
\l,)t>-1-<", h",~ ~()I1)G 1~h} b(o~f\ Lo)Of' h fT . Pv.(~e end~~ ~t )310. L~~ .s ,t< a..+ 13/5.
Arr;\J~& tm sih. ",-4-IOJ.5. jt..111l-et" Mel rro. r"i" pre5~'1t -1t> coIled--54./11f~5. OCfTh +0 I...Xtfer LJOS 3:)..3Y
S(Af'Ilplt"j ~erc.. bO\,I~~ (;,.+ ID'30. Lc::fl-~I·.J.G ~+ ID3d-..
L-________ ....... loo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 OENISON'lJJ!· WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ". See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13(6; Q\NA.rf~(" .N "fro-ft:: ~ll
Location (well name): .... 1 _'''-W_N_-_4 ________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: l""lo.O(ler HoILJ~~/TH
Date and Time for Purgingj 7 /:l-Co) ~o I} and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: IJ[] pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
I j'vJAl .... J Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event '-_______ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0 pH Buffer 4.0 L\.o
Specific Conductance .... 1 _4...!...4..:....4..:....-__ --I".tMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 1.7.5.70
Depth to Water Before Purgingj 3 g . q g Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ,!;b. C:.;l 1(·653h)
3" Well: C> (.367h) "-------'
Conductance (avg) IDOl pH of Water (avg) 7.1'l
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 1~-7~ Redox Potential (Eh)1 3g..~ TurbiditY L-1 ..;::b~l __ --I
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. ac (prior sampling event)I~O
Time I \\ 110 I Gal. Purged I \00 1 Time 1\111 1 Gal. Purged I I/O 1
Conductance I IOo~ 1 pH 1,·18 1 Conductance I lD03 1 pH I /.11 1
Temp. DC I \q.7~ 1 Temp. DC 1 '~.7j 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 '3Z:!1 1 Redox Potential Eh (mY) 1 iIi5 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 ~O .7 1 Turbidity (NTU) 16<-1.1 I
Time 1 \ 1 \ /)' 1 Gal. Purged I I:;2.D 1 Time 1111q 1 Gal. Purged 1 )30 1
Conductance 1 100\ 1 pH 1 7·11 1 Conductance 1 lOoO 1 pH 1 -"1.:20 1
Temp. DC 1 11.L7~ 1 Temp. DC 1 1'1.7<] 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ~J 1 Redox Potential Eh (mY) 1 3:)b 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 '-1:2. \ 1 Turbidity CNTU) 1..51.1 1
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worlisheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1<--\""..3"-0 ___ ----'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm_
S/60 = ,-I __ 10 __ ----'
gal/on(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I Il.~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LabIL-'fI/~/At..:.!.-______ _I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 51 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 g) 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 No Preserv_ 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 g) 0 BI
Gh\or;Jc If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
L..-________ -IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1
OENISOJ)JJ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL .•.. See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 3 riA Q",(Art<!r' ,/J:t .... "'t~ ~Oll
Location ( well name) :1,-~_W---,-tJ_---,S~ ________ ----,
Sampler Name
and initials: =-r;:l'?n-l.r Ho/l,qoti /Ttl
Date and Time for PllrgingJ'-7.:....:.~....::.~-=b::...:./~~_o_/l ____ -' and Sampling (if different) L--tV_I_4<--_____ -'
Well Purging Equip Used:@Jpump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event l-1_11_W_N_ .... _I_.3 ____ -'
pH Buffer 7.0 --;.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance LI--.!q~1...,l.g ___ ----JIf!MHos/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 150. 00
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ f/1'7! Casing Volume (V) 4" well:15;).,Jj 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L..-__ ----'
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) ro.77
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 15.CiS Redox Potential (Eh)13SJ... Turbidity 1....1 _O __ ----J
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)l::Z ] 0
Time I D'p.1 I Gal. Purged I gO I Time 1 OGj~g I Gal. Purged I C/O I
Conductance 131)06' I pH I 6,,77 I Conductance 1 30021 pH I 6.781
Temp. DC I J6. jO I Temp. DC I J5.07 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I s66 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3.5:5 I
Turbidity (NTU) I C) I Turbidity (NTU) I I) I
Time ICfl:;lA I Gal. Purged I 100 I Time I 04~ I Gal. Purged III () I
Conductance I :3002. I pHI 6~ 7S I Conductance 130031 pH I b78 I
Temp. DC I 1.5. () 2.. I Temp. DC I )5.02 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3~~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3::SQ I
Turbidity (NTU) I () I Turbidity (NTU) I CJ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged !L-.:-I -=-?-...,;:O~ __ -l
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L-! ---.:,'_0 __ ---1
gal/on(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q=! \0.']1 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LabfL..~_I...,;;f:t:"'-______ -l
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients ffi 0 100mi 0 B H2SO4 ~
Hea vy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) IE 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
Lhl or'\6e, If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
Arr;lltJ on .sih. ad-011:l..~l'\fltr ",net (,..~rr"n M s;·h rot" ? .... ~c an"; S4fr1pJ/~ '1!V~',-f. fl.1rj< b~~'1
~ b'11Q. PIA(~-l~ w~11 tor fA fo .. h.l of 1;2, "'v\;nu.;-e~. ~{;.,+~(' W~.s Glear ~
PV\r~<. enJ~~ (M\~ S6.lVIplc.,) were collede! 0..1-oQ31. P'('ptl, to WCI.+Ct orfi-C(
p tA(~~ lA:>G0 ,87. \3. Ltj.(}.s ;te. ",--r o~ YO.
'-________ -IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
f:1
2' of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1 OENISONr')A;~4~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
" See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 2>' 01 Q\Ac..f"t~(' ,A.)1!frCA"t--= .=lOll
Location (well name):1 Tw tV -G ~----------------------~
Sampler Name
and initials: 11AV\n~r Ht>l1·IX",~ hit
Date and Time for PurgingJL-7_1_::;.._7_1_:J.._D_'I ________ ....J and Sampling (if different) 1-1 .N __ /-.:.;'f} ____________ -.I
Well Purging Equip Used: []]pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event 1 Q\A(}.r+crl~ P),1'r",1<:.
pH Buffer 7.0 -,.D
Specific ConductanceL-1 _q_1_'1 ___ --1If-lMHOSI cm
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ 7'-1 . .5 g
Conductance (avg) L-I _19_3::..,.1 ______ -1
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
I ~vJAl-l ) Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ~ _______ ....J
pH Buffer 4.0 Lj.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 130.00
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ~b.lg 1(·653h)
3" Well:L-. _D __ --1.(.367h)
pH of Water (avg) 1-1 ="~-8S~ _____ --1
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 15.0li Redox Potential (Eh)1 qso 1 Turbidity I }]. 95
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)1 :2:8'"
Time 11330 I Gal. Purged 1 ~ I Time 113:3J I Gal. Purged I 66 I
Conductance 11l.1I..~ I pH 1 G:. .~.s I Conductance 11Y77 I pH I (0·15 I
Temp. DC I 115 .. 10 I Temp. DC IIS.Ob I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 4h3 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I q5~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I n·r.; I Turbidity (NTU) 111·($ J
Time I 133~ I Gal. Purged I 71 I Time 113'33 I Gal. Purged I 15g I
Conductance I 19~:;-).. I pH 16:.3b I Conductance I 19q~ I pH Ib.gZ I
Temp. DC 116.03 I Temp. DC 11~.LiZS I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 99Z I Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1939 I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 \;;2..0 I Turbidity (NTU) Il.?· L( I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ..... 1 ~S~3~ __ -----,
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1 ...... _1 _I __ -'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 (;.57 !
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~ ..... _/II._'/A _______ .....J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs D 0 3x40 ml D 0 HCL 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100mi 0 ~ H2SO4 ef
Heavy Metals D 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
Ch]or:de If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
Ar,;\)e~ on !.~1-~ ~4 13.:l.\. T~MI~(, An~ G-Mr;" p(e~c::"t .for rv.,.~e ~n~ .s~I"1]>}j e"e.n1.
PU\~e b~~('1 Ai 13:2-5, P \).('j-e~ W~ II tor tI.. +(:'·h,..l ~ ~ N' flv.fe.s, v.:>o.+cr
WCl.5 GI-C:cIlr f~('D\.A-jhouf the. P"''''j'c F\Ar~(. eflJe~ ",)!d ..)6t.~pl!.j Wc.((
Go II at<.). ".I-133'). 0< pth 1, ","T!f "Hcr pu.r~{ """0 10 ."
Lr;..A .si+t: ~} J3YD
'--________ ..... !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
D
0
~
2of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISOJ)~.A :
ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL '" See instruction
MINES I FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER .-~~-----.... -.---~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ De~ription~Sa~l~gE~m: ~13~1~_Q_~_Q_r_~_r~N_;_+_r~_4_C~~_O_J_'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Location (well name):'~~"'~W_IJ_-_7~~~~~~~~--,
Sampler Name
and initials: , ::=y: Y'In~( HoIIIJ~J"H
Date and Time for PurgingJ,-7_J_~-=ts __ I_:J._o_J1 ____ -I and Sampling (if different) I 7 J ().. q /c::?-O / I
Well Purging Equip Used: [][I pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I GrlAnJ'fo.s
Sampling Event I Q"'Cirhr~ .N;fr/i..+~ . . I,WN-7R Prevo Well Sampled m Samplmg Event '-_______ ----1
pH Buffer 7.0 1-0
Specific Conductance L-I _4_1_~ ___ -JIIlMHos/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingj ~ g. g b
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 y.o
Well Depth(O.Olft): I ) DS. DO
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:llo.53 1(.653h)
3" Well : 0 (.367h) L...-__ --'
Well Water Temp. (avg) , 15.'i3 Redox Potential (Eh)L-' ~_\S_b _--, Turbidity I I O;;UJ
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 l7 "
Time I071b I Gal. Purged I 11 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ):l.lq I pHI 7 .~4 I Conductance I I pH , I
Temp. DC I 1 S.Zl,3 I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I L1.5 '" I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I )0:;1..'1 I Turbidity (NTU) I J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Grou'ndwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged L-1....;.\:2... ____ ---'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1L-----O..ll __ --'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 J,ql 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 11.13
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I 1"
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labl~N~/A:.l...-______ ---l
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 rnl 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 RN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 5'1 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
Gh\ori Je If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preserv ati ve:
See instruction
Comment
J\f(·;ued. on ~it~ 0.+ 070'1. ~f\(\t"'" cAntA G-lHr :" prdC:l\t -tor rlAr~'C MrA ~A)'V)fl;~ <IJent.
?U(~< bc:~",() oJ DlIS. Pv.r~t\ LU'l:11 .for'\. .J-oh .. l of \ l'-\:nvJc:. D.f\a ~ !>ec.onds.
PI.A. ... ~d v:lc\\ ~('~'. ~o..+e(' n,,~ \Jc ... .J '\Hk c..chwp,f·,on, ?l.A.r~!' -en~ed 0..1-071&/ Lef-r s/h 4 0720
A(r,vc~ 0(1 .s:+< ~1 lDID . -r"nrlG( unJ. 0-l4fI'';Yl r>rc~c"+ +0 ~6)L=d .so.1V/pJ~. D~p+J., ..J..o ~c..t~,.. lUctj q.(..)j
So.Mpl~ tNCrc: h>.:l~A 0..+ 10)5 L~+l-s;t, c..+ IOXl.,.
L..-________ -IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONr)~ ~: ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL '" See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Samplin~ Event: 1 3 f 6. Qv-.Q.rt U N : 1,.. o..tc ~C> 11
Location (well name):L..1 _T_w_Al_-_7'--R ________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: Ff9..nner )Jo)I '~~/"""H
Date and Time for Purgin~,-7_/ :1._g;:;.;/,-::u>_,_, ____ --' and Sampling (if different) .p/ A '---------~
Well Purging Equip Used :~pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event 1 QV\o.r+erb .tJi-tro..h.
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance 1-1 _9.!-q'-q ___ -I1 f-lMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purginm .... _D __ ----'
Conductance (avg) \ .0
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... 1 "_W_N_-_l_.5 ____ ----'
pH Buffer 4.0 Y ·O
Well Depth(O.Olft): LI _0 ___ -.1
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:II-_O __ ----iI(.653h)
3"Well:. c) .(.367h)
~.31
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 ~.~ Redox Potential (Eh) 1 Y bb Turbidityl'--O ___ -I
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event}l) () 0
Time ID/03 I Gal. Purged I) gs I Time 1 I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 11.0 I pH 16 .3 1 I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC IM .~5 I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I y bb I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I CJ I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1...1 _1.._0_0 ___ -'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S/60 = ,--I _11 __ ---'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) (:) L...-___ --'
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated t> L...-___ --'
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L-_.v_'1_~ ______ ---,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 m! 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 'e!l
Heavy Metal s 0 0 250 m! 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250m! 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 m! 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) f3 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
eh\or-'Ide,. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
A1'"f";\le..3" 01"\ ~A·c. tAt O-b30,lo,nne(' tAnrA &Mr;n pre.S.,(:/,,\+ -For 'R:t\~"tc:. Rinst1\fe be...j!1,T'J Cl\d"-Ob'i(,
f",(f)pe~ so (,.D\\Ions 0+ SOOl.'P \No.-tt::(1 ;0 &""l\on,s b-t Ac.j~ \JJ",.h:~ Ac.i~ II-)IlI.'h·,. v:l~~T'u.lli\peo\
+·,rs.t. .rih~).. R;n,v~h~ b~ fVMfJ'.::j ~. 100 ('-(711]0"5 0+ DJ: ~O\te(". 'so.fVlfJC's
Were Loll~c:1~~ o..-t 070S Le,.\t'sitc d\.t 0707,
'--________ ...JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
'Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan {QAP}
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 OENISONI)~~, WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL "'" See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 31"1:\ Q",,,,r1-!.r N ."tro.+e.;2.0 II
Location (well name):I-rwrJ-e ~~~~~--------------~
Sampler Name
and initials: 11~Mer ~olll'JAvrtt
Date and Time for Purgin~ 7 /~/2-0 1 \ and Sampling (if different) ..... , _.N_I_~ ______ -,
Well Purging Equip Used: 00 pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event 'Qv.o..acr1Yl tJ :t("~-< Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I "TWN-8 R.
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D pH Buffer 4.0 y.O
Specific Conductance L-I ---,~...!.cr-,-' ______ -JI fAMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1145.50
Depth to Water Before Purgind b \. bl Casing Volume (V) 4" well:15'i .71 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '---------'
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) 1 I-_7_.~~'1 _____ -,
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \~ .~,s Redox Potential (Eh) LI _I 0.:....3 __ --' Turbidity 1-1 ----.;:O~_--'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)' ~O"
Time 1 07;lQ 1 Gal. Purged 1 1 DC) 1 Time 1 D72..1 1 Gal. Purged , )}D 1
Conductance 1 ;;L3'3b 1 pH 1 /.31 1 Conductance I ~33~ 1 pH 1730 1
Temp.oC I Iy ·gb I Temp.oC 11y ·g" 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I lOQ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 IDJ.. 1
Turbidity (NTU) I Q I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I OJ~;)" I Gal. Purged I );2.0 1 Time I (J1X3 1 Gal. Purged 1 130 1
Conductance I ~\Ho 1 pHI 7.:;.g 1 Conductance 1..;>.3 ~Gf 1 pHI -'.~7 1
Temp.oC I 14·8.k, 1 Temp.oC I 14 .KS I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 104 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ID~ 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 I Turbidity (NTU) 1 () 1
White Mesa Mill
Field 'Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged L..I -1..}3,.LOIol-__ -I gal\on(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm. Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 10 T=2V/Q= I lO . .qS I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L...:....tJ_/,.:....'fJ, ______ ----I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 mI
Nutrients ISlJ 0 100 mI
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 mI
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250mI
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 mI
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume
c..h \or-,J(
Comment
A(r;IJ~~ on -Si+<-A.t 070:2,. Il7\1Ine(" D.nc.\ (j.r..(,in on s,:}"
b~~t" ()..1-D710 . 'PlAr~e~ IJ.)~II tor #" tof" I of 13
the plA~~<.. PV.(~'C -en~~tl. 1:t'1~ -SIAMpks IJ-.)cr~
Dept\.. ·to ~tcr ~fl-cr plA\jc. W4~ 77.31.
0 0 HCL 0
0 ti?J H2SO4 00
0 0 HN03 0
0 0 No Preserv. 0
0 0 HN03 0
0 I:Kl 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
+0(" pv.~~ (An ~ s()''''f'I;~ evenT. PlAr(j(
,v\:YlLl.+~.s. WtAtu WCl.~ c)ear-+~rou~ho\Ar
C 011 c (t-ed ad-0 7~3.
LC+1-s/r< IA..J--073~.
L-________ .....JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for "Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
m
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I ()ENISONI)~ J~. ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 QIN>..r+ (,1""1;-\ N ;'\ro...+<:.. ;;.l.O 11 7l f'JI Q ",o..d~r
Location (well name): .... I-r....:......:..w....:..tV....:......:.. ... _~_R _________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials:
Date and Time for Purgin~'-....!..7...:.../l:;;;;2..:.:C,;.L./.!!:::J..:=.O~lJ ____ ---' and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [IDpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
See instruction
;JIll
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... 1_R_,_e_z._-_1 ____ ----'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 ---,~,-,q-,",--__ --,I f,tMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purginm1.... __ 0 __ --'
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): L-I _C> ____ ....J
Casing Volume (V) 4" w ell:t_o __ -II(.653h)
3" W ell:. 0 . (.367h)
Conductance (avg) 1.7 pH of Water (avg) L--_______ ---'
Well Water Temp. (avg) ')..7· DC:; 1 Redox Potential (Eh) 1'-3_8 _'_---' TurbiditY L-1 _0 __ ---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 :J...O a
Time IOb3"1 I Gal. Purged II go I Time 1 I Gal. Purged 1 I
Conductance I \.1 I pH b.~b I Conductance I I pH 1 I
Temp. DC I ').1.0"-I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~g7 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev, 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged .... 1 _~_O_O ___ --,
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S/60 =1 L------:.'-"-0 __ ----'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 0 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0 1.-___ --'
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated LI _O ___ ....J
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LabIL..!..N::..!:/,..:..:.'I+:...--_____ ----l
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients [j 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 til 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) [j 0 Sample volume 0 []. 0 1&1
ChlD';!0 If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
A(,f';\J~J. on SI'te:: 0\+ ObiS, -r:I'lMr" ~(\tA G-r;.rr.~ On ~:+c -0 per+orYV'l R:n5d\+~.
Ri n So..1-<. b-ej6..n ;r Ob~D. ?lJ..Mr~ck f.O G-c..llb)'\j 0+ Ac'J. l.J~1-~(" 56 6-~JJon.5 .5.t:Jef? Wo..+~(,
~h~ -100 (,-"IIDI"J 0.[ ~:r. ~~1-e4. R:(1~t--+-e encAeJ o.nJ .5 cuV'JpJ-e.s We""~ <.oJ 1e \.l-c:e/
~} 'c:''1D. LG+t ~i·h /k-r ObYS
1.-________ ...JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Workshe-et for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance plan (QAP)
OENISONI)~ A.
ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL /';. See instruction
MIN ES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
D~criptionofSam~~gEve~: ~13_r_~~Q_~_~_J_e_r_~~J_r_~_~~~_O_'_'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sampler Name _
Location (well name):II---r~W_}J~~_~~~~~~~~~~---, and initials: f1'NCt==.,.,;,n-"c-r~Hro""l J.-:-!·J;-'1j~h:--I1~~~~"""
Date and Time for Purgin~ "1/;1..&/.9-0 II
Well Purging Equip Used:l][jpump or{]] bailer
Sampling Event I~o..-ta 6 .N ;·h"o. ~ <
pH Buffer 7.0 1-1 _7...:......-.0 ___ --1
Specific ConductanceLI q..:...q-:~~~~~--IlfAMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purginm C:,3. Cao
Conductance (avg)
and Sampling (if different) 17 / ~q ) G-Q/ J
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I G(,IAI1JJ<G
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I-_--1'_W._W~~_1_7 ____ -,
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 Q7.0D
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:12\ .8) 1(·653h)
3" Well: 1-. _o __ --1.(.367h)
b.bl
Well Water Temp. (avg) I n;·~"5 Redox Potential (Eh) 1 '3 i CJ Turbidity 1.2 7. k
Weather Condo Ext" Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)I~7°
Time Il~1 1 Gal. Purged 130 I Time 1 I Gal. Purged 1 1
Conductance 1 :;Lb03 I pH I ".Q 1 Conductance I I pHI 1
Temp.oC I lC:.A3 I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~7q I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 'J-'7·b I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill· Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged L-I -=3;;....D ____ ......
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S/60= ,-I _1_1 __ ---.I
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 3.Q' I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 \.;2.'-\
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 30
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labl,--#._~-,-A,--_____ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 rnl 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients rJ 0 100 rnl 0 ug H2SO4 ffi 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 rnl 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 00
CJ, \l)r;J~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
Arr;veJ.. on s;+~ cd-1218. --;"nn(r 1A1'ld. &M,,;n rr~.s~,.J--rur rv.r~e ,,~~ SIl\.W1P),~, 1!!vel'1+' P",r()< 'b\r""+
)~'i, PlA(~e~ v.)ell for (I-... +0-\-0-.\ ~ ;t M:nv.t~ lAna ~7 Sccon~.s. Pu..(~~J Well J(jl. WiA+c(' WCt~
lr'os-t1~ d~W".! PW'..':)c. enJea 6 • .+' 1~~7. Left ~;·h. ~+ 1.;l.33. Arr:"e~ On ~(\-c. At-tD~Y . ~""v 6.../IrA Cr(Ar';'" pr£kl1+ +0 c.c>/J~d-.6C(l''1p}(!~, PGPi-h +0 wA1cr W4...l 63.6,5
Sq,l'Y\plt:.~ ~er,-bt).:\ccl oJ Ib37. Le-tt-S;.te. .9.+ }03~
L--________ --1IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 I) Ai d; WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL OENISONNil ikJ "', See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 3 rao; Qv..o.t=+~ .... }j :+ro-fe ~Oll
Location (well name):t-I-r_W_/J_-_IO _________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: trD-nt'le(' flol \.a~/-rH
Date and Time for Purgind 7 /;L.b/~oll and Sampling (if different) 1 ..... 1_1_:;l._1....;..'I._:;._0_1/ ____ -'
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump or{]] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I -JWA1-I~
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 L1.0
Specific Conductancel-I -J4c..:..9....:.4 ___ .....JI!!MHOSI cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1105.60
Depth to W ater Before PurgingJ ..... g=--I._1 1_--, Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 tS. bO 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '"----'
Conductance (avg) 3 '=.;)",1 '---=~ _______ .....J pH of Water (avg) ..... 1 L1....:.-,5_Y _____ --'
Well Water Temp, (avg) IS . 7B Redox Potential (Eh)1 L1bX Turbidity 1 SZ .,
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling eventll.;l. yo
Time 1 130 1 I Gal. Purged I , , I Time 1 ; O,;,t . I Gal. Purged 1_,_ ~ I
Conductance I ?:.S7h . I pH 1 '~,n I Conductance I ~ I .. ;o(;,i I pH I '..t I L~ _ I ... ~
Temp.oC 116 .3 0 I Temp.oC I i . .) "II I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~jl I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I )I..j . I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~ I Turbidity (NTU) I ' 'j.) . I
Time I:"'.,'; i , I Gal. Purged I ' J -I Time 1130Y I Gal. Purged I q?J I
Conductance I; \..r. '::0 , I pH I i· ..... I Conductance 13b:X.l I pH I g-~ I
Temp.oC I . ~ . I Temp.oC I 15 ·7"$ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I }Z)/ , -I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I YU I
Turbidity (NTU) I :. J 1 \ I Turbidity (NTU) I:SB .J I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater ' 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1'-_4 ...... .5L..-__ -' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1 10 T=2V/Q= 11>·1~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1-1 ---,45~ __ --l
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab!I-_,.} ..... fA.=--______ ----'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 IE 0 KI
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
Ar(:\.I~a on ,s,+c o.f 1.l5'. ~fln(',... ~flJ vo.rr;Y) pr~jcrrr +"6,-fur~e "IntlStUnpJ.Aj e.veni:
'P",,..~e. 6'C5C>.fl ~t l~bO. f\Ar~<~ Well -f()( 6.. 1-6+",\ of Y N :(J",Jrj ~Yl4 3D Se(oY?Js.
P ;rtd !Nell d,.;). Pw~<. end.J ",1 l~O'''l. L<# sHe ,fl )308
~(r"\l~, 01"\ 5.;+c ~~ O~?"O-I"'nl\e,..tA.f'lG\ &tA.cr'·11 o...rc.o n.s.1-c. -k <..ojl~d' .s",,.,p)t.J . uCff-/" h w",h,.... Wa..s rnbS. 0..."", ~ were b4\ Icclt 11\1-o (..:;l.S. L~.H ~i1e. 0..1' cb;t8 . I
'-________ -lIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 j OENISONI)~~
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: 131' hi Qv..o.rte(}j :+1'"o.te :;).D 11
Location (well name): .... I-r_W_JV_-_l_I ________ ______
Sampler Name
and initials: '~"t\er Hbll .J~fry
Date and Time for PurgingJL-7~j~~;....7.:..:/...:::;~_O_I,;..1 ___ ---I and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [IDpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event l-rvJ.,0 -11 JC:..
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4·0
Specific Conductance 1-1 ---,4_ct--,~,"-_----,1 !-lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I l~~.DD
Depth to Water Before Purgindb't .t;) Casing Volume (V) 4" w ell:1 Y1.3.3 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) 1..--___ ......
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) b.7lt
Well Water Temp. (avg) , \S.11 Redox Potential (Eh) 1-' =3...:.47"""'""---_ ..... Turbidity I 8.17
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·C (prior sampling event)l~r
Time I l;t.'3.f. I Gal. Purged I i 0 . I Time 1 1;l3~ I Gal. Purged 181) -I
II 81
Conductance 1'1..700 I pH 1 G).73 I Conductance 1;;"70 ";)" I pHI 6.73 I
Temp. DC I 15, ILl I Temp. DC 115 .11 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I qoi I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I qo:( I
Turbidity (NTU) I 3 .;2. I Turbidity (NTU) l_~' J J
Time Il;t.qO I Gal. Purged I :1 0 . I ~1
Time 11;l.4 I I Gal. Purged I I 00 • I I/~
Conductance I ;)..,D'-I I pH I (;, Ig I Conductance I ;L 7z:5S I pH IG.76 I
Temp. DC 115 .1::t: I Temp. DC 1 15 .1 ~ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '1)'16 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 138' I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~.~ I Turbidity (NTU) I ~·7 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1'--_1'-"_0 ___ --'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = ...... 1 -..;1....;...1 __ --'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 ~.W 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab!'-'~'---JVA,-,--______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Type Added
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients E 0 100ml 0 ~ H2SO4 1:1
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) iJ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
Ch\or;J( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
-See instruction
Comment
A rr\\)ej on f.;.t~ ~+ 1;2;2..1. -r;...M)er" "'-n~ &o.(r;(I pre~ent,hr"' pv.rj-e.. t:lflJ .s:"Mp);~ e\.l(.(J-T.
PI.A"'~~ b~O\" 0-1-1:;1..31. P\.t,('~w lNell tor" +0+&0.1 cJ; \0 ~i~l.At<.~. l..)Q.+e( W(A.~
C.Jc:u r +hro~hou.+ i-h<-plArj< -Pv..('~ -<:. ende~ and. ~qrr]f).r:s L0erc co/)ec+~J ~}-
1;;.41. O~.p+h +C> lJ-')Ct+c:r 6..+i-~r p \.{r3~ "'fie}. f' ""'P~ p\.lfV) P fyJlcd. l.Jqj
gE.OI \ t e-fl-Site. A-} P Y1
L..-________ ...JIDO not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
tJ
Z" of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONI)J ~. ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL "-, See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13rJi Q..,.tArte"'N,·+(u.+~ ';)"011
Sampler Name
and initials: "'-;'-nne,.-Holl;Jc.j/-r» Location (well name):LI T....!...,.;w:..;..·!..,.JJ_----!,1.:....1 _R:......:-______ -l
Date and Time for Purgingj 7/.:J.. 7J~OIJ and Sampling (if different) L-.M_~_)\ _________ --,
Well Purging Equip Used: ~ pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event 1 Qv...Mhrl~ /\) ;tl"",,-t<
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance,-I_~,-qL-9'---__ ...JI!!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before PurgingjL __ O __ ......I
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I '-_t_W_,N_-_l_C> ____ ......I
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 ;/)i ~J o
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~_o __ ---iI(.653h)
3" Welt 0 (.367h)
5.09..
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 ~·3b Redox Potential (Eh) 1 SOf, TurbiditYLI ~6:-_.....J
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp .• ( (prior sampling event)1 :l.. T·
Time 1 \').()7 I Gal. Purged Il g () I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 6.3 I pH Is.O:l. I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I 9d.. '3k, I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 5D6 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged L-I ..... 6:::::,0.:..,.0 ___ -'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = L-I ~II __ .-l
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LabfL.-'ft/.",-/."",/O~ ______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample
VOCs
Nutrients
Heavy Metals
All Other Non Radiologics
Gross Alpha
Other (specify)
CJ.~\ol"~d(
Comment
A rr·.v~~ 0" ~;h 6..+
5..1-/ J50. P\At'V1peJ.
of D 1:' \...:)0.+<.(,
if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
0 0 3x40 rnl 0 0 HCL 0
~ 0 100 rnl 0 ~ H2SO4 KI
0 0 250 rnl 0 0 HN03 0
0 0 250 ml 0 0 NoPreserv. 0
0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
OJ 0 Sample volume 0 [2l. 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
\\4G.. -r-;.1"1'Ief' A.ntk (;-Q.r(;1) ?re~e(\t ~D(' R;/'ls6..te. ~;n.s&\+o! .stl"i'+"~
So G-e,I/on..5 of 1t<..,'A w,,+-\(") ~o G-IIJlOfIj of' Soap wo..-hr. /00 f.-'1/Jo,,~
!,(At'\'lples Wer(j (.ollec,tt!J a.+ \:;2.0'1. l~.fJ s;f~ eJ lal~.
L-________ ...JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
tii3
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 I)' ~1 4 WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL OENISON m f.~ , ~" See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 3r()l Qv.o.;\"Gr jV \ t ("~:J~ :;t611
Location (well name):LI _T_w_j.J_-_)~ ________ -....J
Sampler Name
and initials: I4""AMC.r"" H()n\J"~/lft
Date and Time for Pm'gins! 7 /';.~/;;"oll and Sampling (if different) ~/IJ::"'</.:..L<1..!..-_____ ....J
Well Purging Equip Used: IT[] pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I 6< v-n ~fo s.
Sampling Event I Q\ACArtcrlj J0 ;=Fr(A.fc:. Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I TWA.) -'1
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 ii.o
Specific ConductanceL..1 _4.;...C4-=' ___ ......III-lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 110-00
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ 3 J . go 4" well:15 1 .Db 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L....-__ --'
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) 7.0::l..
Well Water Temp. (avg) I jt.J.&J Redox Potential (Eh) 1,--,-,=1 ~,-b __ ......1 Turbidity I bO.7
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) I ;).. Y b
Time 1\:;2..\3 I Gal. Purged I C\O I Time I 1;2../LJ I Gal. Purged I }OO I
Conductance I ;l.L) J7 I pH I 7.00 I Conductance I ~l.'~1 I pH I 7.0~ I
Temp. DC 1 1'-\.83 I Temp. DC 1\\)·84 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 I is <;? I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 1&'~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I bl .7 I Turbidity (NTU) I bl.q J
Time 1 1 ,,::I 5 I Gal. Purged I 110 I Time I)XI b I Gal. Purged I I:2.D I
Conductance I ~Y3° I pH I 7·0'J. I Conductance I c?J-I~O I pH I 7.0L/ I
Temp. DC I )L\. g3 I Temp. DC I 114·83 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 18:5 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 1~.5 I
Turbidity (NTU) I (:;6.] I Turbidity (NTU) I 5:1 I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
MiII-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1-1 "",l~::.......:..;;O~ __ --, gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = L-I _1o ___ --' T=2V/Q= I \O.~l I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~,--N_/_A,,--_____ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 rnl 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 rnl 0 ~ H2SO4 ro 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 rnl 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
C~ lor;J( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
L...-________ ...... IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 OENISONI)~~: WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL '!. See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 3 rb: Q\A(J.l'tcr /J ::t(<>t<-;ZOI J
Location (well name): ... I-r-_W_N_-_13 _________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: l"""o.l1nu HI>II .4~~/TH
Date and Time for Pllrgin~ 7/:;Lb /?-O/\ and Sampling (if different) I-k_J/_~ ______ --.-J
Well Purging Equip Used:@Jpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I G-rU\,.,iJ~
Sampling Event I Gv..o.rl<..r b j'J ,+(""(:>.+.(. I -rWN -8 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L _______ ---I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance LI....:~;...:.~_~ ___ __1II-lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): Il?D.OO
Depth to Water Before Purgingj L\ (" .1...\ 0 4" well:14g.o6 IC.653h)
3" Well: Q _(.367h) '--------'
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I IS. J~ Redox Potential (Eh) I :l b 3 TurbiditYL-1 --,-1 ..:...>\ .gL--_--'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)L-I;2._' .. _......J
Time I O&,?-) I Gal. Purged I gO I Time lOR,;!,;), I Gal. Purged I gO I
Conductance III qy I pH I 7.g0 I Conductance I ]]37 I pH I 7·g0 I
Temp. DC I \ f>.lg I Temp. DC I 15.1/ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;>.}j6 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2.70 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 11-& I Turbidity (NTU) I )1.q J
Time 108;&3 I Gal. Purged I 10 () I Time la3JOY I Gal. Purged I 11 0 I
Conductance I 1l,s8: I pH I 7.f{J I Conductance I l1QO I pH 1="81 I
Temp. DC II~.IS I Temp. DC I lS_IY I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I :l.~~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ,?LJ7 I
Turbidity (NTU) I I]'[{ I Turbidity (NTU) I lI.g I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ... 1---IIIo.!.I:=..D ___ --' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two ca iog volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1,---,-1 D ___ -' T=2V/Q= I ~.b\ 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labl ... _,/'I---''/It-=--______ -'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients B 0 100ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 RN03 0
Other (specify) Bl 0 Sample volume 0 Gl 0
C h \Dr;~ <-If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
A<r:vea 0(\ site: 0..+ Ogog . ~lInu il.fle.l 6-tMr:" 01'1 $''J--c ~I' ?lAI'6-<= dln"\ 54)y)p);'j e,VeI11.
'PV.(~': be~(,'1\ 0.+ 051. 13. ?l.Ar~ca \).)c:1[ -tor "'-.¢D+II.I ~ /1 t-\,'t\1.\10 . We&cr LJa.s GI~or
+hrO\A~"'c)v.t 11G pu./jc. P\Ar~< <:Y)~c:~ Q.flA S4.VYJpl~ Were co/Jcd'e~ 4+ 08J-~.
D ~pth }'O U)c...,fc r ",Pr-c..r PW-0e \.V6.$ ~7 . ~j, Lor} s,'f-(, ed-OS35.
L..-________ -lIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 bf2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1
OENISOt!) ~ ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ,~;, See instruction
MINES j FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sa~pling Event: 13 (J Qu,CArta .;..J ."+(t).+e. ;20 I'
Location (well name ):LI _-r_W--,-tJ_~--:......;1 y:.....-_______ ---J
Sampler Name
and initials: 1'1:nn-Gr ).tol/;J4.:j!-nr
Date and Time for PurgingJ V,:1.8!:;'Ojl and Sampling (if different) 17/::z.qj().oj}
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event LI ~_W_N_-_l_f{ ____ -J
pH Buffer 7.0 7·0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y·O
Specific Conductance <-I -Q.!..:Q"-fo1-----11 !!MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 13.5.00
Depth to Water Before Purgingj ~ .~, Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 47. J() 1(·653h)
3" Well: i) (.367h) '---=---..-1
Conductance (avg) 103'1 pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \ '=-.00 Redox Potential (Eh) <-I _Ll..;,...O_'_..-I Turbidity 1 5Y .~
Weather Condo Ext" Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling eventll;l..J 0
Time 1 C>G\ \.b I Gal. Purged 1 S' 0 I Time 1 I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 1 103Y I pH I 7 .sg 1 Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC 11C.OD I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I gOI I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I SC\.:;2,. I Turbidity (NTU) l I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged .... 1 __ 5...,,0"-' __ ----'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = __ I ----'-1..11 __ -----'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca jog volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = 1 g.5 c:: I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L-/lJ;";"';/'...LA..!.....-______ .....I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 rnl 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients I1l 0 100rnl 0 [j H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 rnl 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 rn 0 QiI
Gh l{)riJ~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
L-________ --IIDO not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwafer 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 OENISOn~.~i WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL '.. See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER -.--~ ----------. -----. ..--?;:-r;.J,;.r----,....----;-----::-..,..-:----r---:;~:_:__--------------__,
Description of Sampling Event: 1 '3 ( Q~().rfe(" ,/V i+ ..... o..1".::. ;to l \
Location (well name):I.-II_I/IJ_tJ_-~\ :) ________ ----..1
Sampler Name
and initials: 1'1 c?.t'lI1~r Holl; ~~~)11f
Date and Time for Purgingj 7/:;J..1/d-D1\ and Sampling (if different) 1 "7J~8/';<OlJ
Well Purging Equip Used: [J[Jpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 &-rllln JO\=~
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I -rW;\J -I'"
pH Buffer 7.0 I_V pH Buffer 4.0 t..!.o
Specific Conductance ,-l -:.q_~1-,---___ -,If!MHOSI cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 ISS. DO
Depth to Water Before Purginm 4~.JS Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 Y'-D9 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) 1--__ ----1
Conductance (avg) I,--'~_'_b_l _____ --, pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \ S .33 Redox Potential (Eh) ..... 1 ~_b:;t __ -, Turbidity 1 11;2. ./
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)l ;),,7"
Time IISIO I Gal. Purged I S:, 1 Time 1 1 Gal. Purged 1 1
Conductance 1 )\4b \ 1 pH 1 b.g~ 1 Conductance I I pH I 1
Temp.oC I lS·3'2> I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3("?-I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I )I;;t. , I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1I.....-5_b ____ --'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1,---,-) +-1 __ ---'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca i.ng volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 7,Y~ 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) i ,3 L}
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 155
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab! ..... ..:...#_/<-JA'-'--______ -'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 m1 0 r8 H2SO4 EtlI 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 m1 0 0 No Preserv, 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) III 0 Sample volume 0 I1l 0 fB
Ghlor;c,\e If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
A(r;.:Jt!~ 011 s:-tt 6..1 )5r>D . ~YlI"I-l( G\r1~ &-Mf;" pre~n1--~r f\J-r~e g.,YlJ ~ArY\p);~ -e,\Jerd'. J
Pv..(~~ be~fAn ~-t \SO~, Pv..~,~-ed \J.1e,11 ~r ~ .}o1-&\1 of' S M:~\.Atc..s, P\.\("~e~ ~e:1J ol~_
w~,:tr(' \.V~ ~ J;Hll. M.J~ v.:lhl~ ['610{', (.1ct4.(e-cft ~ j;.}-:t)". L~ Slit: ",--1' lSJ-Z. .
A((:IJ~lJ. em ~;+c:. 0.1 Ob)~. -r;"(ll'\cr,,,n~ &-fAf('·" prt'se,,+·t.:. c.oll-ecY 501./V1pl~$, D~p+~t~~~+e('w"Sq:z30
)fJttvlple~ lJ.)er~ blJi.;JeJ oJ ° ".a. L L-e-0-oS i+c: a,T Ob.25,
'--________ -'IDO not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Fie-'d Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISOJ),4 ~! ATTACHMENT I Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ". See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13' dI Q'-'fAr1'u N:ht..fc ;l.bl}
Location (well name ):1-1 __ T_W_Al_-_l , _______ --l
Sampler Name ~<<----t+-"TT""+----:---:----"""
and initials: tT ... l'1t"1~" nc>}],'Ii(A~/T"j
Date and Time for Purgind 7 1{).7 /~I]
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event 1 Q",Go. d-c:.r b ",:Of re(fc
pH Buffer 7.0 7 .0
Specific ConductanceI-I _4_'1_'1 ___ ---'1 !!MHOSI cm
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ q g . 00
Conductance (avg) I~ 11
and Sampling (if different) Il....!r~/A~ _____ ---I
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 UV"VI nd-fO.s
l -rwN-G Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-_______ .....
pH Buffer 4.0 q.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1100 .00
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:133.qS 1(·653h)
3" Well : 0 (.367h) L..-__ ---'
G.gJ
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 15.03 Redox Potential (Eh)IL--Y_l_0 _---' Turbidjty ..... 1 _0 __ ---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)I;2>8 D
Time 1 lq9--D I Gal. Purged 1 \,)~ I Time 119~1 I Gal. Purged 1 r:;5 I
Conductance I \~,.~ I pH I L.~O I Conductance I , ~d--3 I pH I ~.Z7 1
Temp. DC /lS.D~ I Temp. DC / \:"D5 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I [.1~~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) 191,S I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) l 0 .I
Time I )l.\~ I Gal. Purged I 66 I Time I \9~3 I Gal. Purged I 77 I
Conductance Il~ IS I pH I C;,bl / Conductance Ilgcn I pH I b-Z.5 I
Temp. DC I 'S,03 I Temp. DC I l's .DD I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I :103 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) /3lJ'1 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I Q I
White Mesa Mill
Fielil Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1L..-..7/-:!..7 ___ --' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1-1 _1/ ___ --' T=2V/Q= 1 b .l7 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~~/V:...t./:...:.~=--_____ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients Ei.I 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) E?J 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
G~\or',JG If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
A('r,'v~J 01'\ s;h G\} 14}~. };.nt\er fAtlJ. &6.(r;r! 'ff'C5e-~-For f1~"~e ~1)tA s~mf]:",j -event
Pv.,.~~ beZ)"rJ...,t 1"1).6.1 'P~r~c~ ,~c:1I for f1\. .ta.r~' o.r 7 M·.fI",-t~~, V{ch~r vJo-S C1eu.Y'!
p v-r~G -l'nJej \r. \ 6~mpk~ were LolJ~ch·J tk+ lL.I.?3. D (ptl, to v.JcCrt'r o..ffer
? U.(~C ~tC:. b Ll. Z I l ~t} .s it -G tAt ]l.l30.
L.-________ ..... IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 OENISOJ)P~ ~' WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL r.o See instruction
MINES I FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
De~riptionofSampl~gEw~: ~1 _~_r_6~G~~~~~r~h~r ~~_:_+_r_A~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Location (well name) :~I _I'=--W----=-tJ_--=--l1=-----~~~~~~~____.J
Sampler Name
and initials: !---lo.Me.r HoI1;J-~ J-n~
Date and Time for PUl·gjn~\,..,_/..:..J_'__;l...I!!.$..:....;/:J..:..........:ol..:.....1 ~ __ ----' and Sampling (if different) ! '1 J~q J.:l.a 1/
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event IIW JJ,... 1~
pH Buffer 7.0 7 .0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y.Q
Specific Conductance\,..,' --L9-1-jj.l.....-__ --JII-lMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): !,-\.:..:.I~O-,---,. C1;;,.;;ll:..........:_----'
Depth to Water Before Purgingj :2>'1.;3 4 4" well:1 Y4·:J1 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '---.....;;...------'
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) ,------,-)..:....;1 ~:..........:D~~ __ ----' pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) IS .15 Redox Potential (Eh)! '-l.\....!..:::::"!J7~_.....J Turbidity! 30.~
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event) I ~ 0
Time ! 1103 I Gal. Purged ! bC:, I Time I I Gal. Purged ! I
Conductance I 11~O I pH I /.3b I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I 15,W; I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '-\3/ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 30,Q I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 '--->b"""'7.L--__ -'"
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = ,-I _-:.11 __ --'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 g.97 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) \.~5
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~'-"":#.....L..JaA ______ ---,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 rnl 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients rn 0 100 rnl 0 ~ H2SO4 Q5I
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 I1f 0
L.h\o(;Je. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
Afr;lJe~ 6(\ ~ih d--1-IO.5~. -)o.rll1er iA.nJ. 6-Q.rr:" ffLSerrt +c.r p"'r5<:' d-"~ so"rvJpl;:j -e.v<:.I')+.
Fu.r~<! bejl'Afl 11-+ ID57. Pur eJ We)} -tor.,., +ot,:d Ot' 16 M;I'hAte.,.,S doll). 5 ~~~onJs_ Pvr~eJ.
well fA~ ~ ~""hr w~S ~ IIU~;~~ I'\'ll)~ ~/)Ior bv.+.s. )O~~ c1 eo.rec1. et.\r~e e.,.,d~ A "'+ 110,3.
L-et-l-SI-te. g.,1-Ilog. lhr:vt.d. 0" ~it-c a..t 1 .... '"17. "-;'"nt:r (",,(lJ.. &o..rr;fI f""G~Gnt t() coll~Gt
S"'I'\\?I.e~. Oepf-!.) h \..V6,ter ~ 34·Y8 ~""'plf~ li>-e('c-b",;lcJ.~} 105]. Le-0-s,j-c o.} 105'-1
'--________ ....IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
j2g
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONl)j ~' ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
/'" See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13""(X Qv\tAr+cr Ni-J. .... ",+c. ;).,0/1
Sampler Name
Location (well name):I-rvJ tv -I g and initials: I...-r,.nn~r }/oll:J4..'1./T/t
Date and Time for Purgin~ 7/~f2..0 II and Sampling (if different) 1-1 :...;:N:..:../~Jt ______ -J
Well Purging Equip Used: []]pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) l6-rlAtld'ldS
Sampling Event I Qv. ""rtc .... \j AJ ,'+( 4..+c.. l -rvJAJ-7 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1-_______ ----'
pH Buffer 7.0 1-1 _7'-.-"-O ___ -J pH Buffer 4.0 y.o
Specific Conductance LI --Lq,J..oIiL---__ -lIf.lMHOSI cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 1~.5. OD
Depth to Water Before Purgingj 57. <&7 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 .t,b.gq 1(·653h)
3" Well : 0 (.367h) ~'---_---J
Conductance (avg) 1-1 _;).._1~ ______ ---I pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 114-SS Redox Potential (Eh) 1L-.L1...;.\.;..;:J:.'---_--' Turbidi ty lt-~_O __ --,
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event),-II:...:~_o _-,
Time I D~;lCo I Gal. Purged I qq I Time I o~;)."1 I Gal. Purged I 1 J 0 I
Conductance I ?.llg I pH I Co ·9" I Conductance 1 ;lI~O I pHIG.en I
Temp. DC I \L\.;(O I Temp. DC II Lf. 5fC> I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I g ::t.=> I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I q;to I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~D .7 I Turbidity (NTU) I ~O .fc:. I
Time lo~~~ I Gal. Purged I I ~I I Time I oB;l.q I Gal. Purged I 139-I
Conductance I :1..1 ;L3 I pH I r.;.l:ffo I Conductance I :2.1;2.8 I pH I G .~7 I
Temp. DC I \l:~ ·Sy I Temp.oC 119·5Lf I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I clIg I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I q 07 I
Turbidity (NTU) 121 .) I Turbidity (NTU) I .9-1 . t..l I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1'---'13'-.;;1..--"-__ ---'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = ,--I ~J 1 __ ---'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 1 10.3'-1 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab1'-'-N..::c...-/"-'A ______ ---'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 D:J H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 B 0
Ch lor; de If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction '. Comment
Arriue4 on sit, ~.+ 08)1. j;.nnu M.J. &a.,.(',';, prc5 cYlJ-JO,.-?IA/'(f~ antA .5am,Pk~ -even~.
?"'r~c. b~,,() 0817· P\.Ar~J.. w~11 -tor G\ +ot,,1 0-+ 1,;( ,.-\:Yl vJ(~. WCA f("r \.UGJ
t(\o H~ Glco.('. PV.(~(, ef1a(~ N'~ SC\rYI pic'!:' \.N<r~ (0 Ilah,J ~+ 08J.9
Dcp ~ +0 l,.)6\+cr t\,fh,. p\Ar~c ~f7G\ PLAf'I7f L.0~ P"tJlcJ ~~ 5q.~ I
Lc~+ 5/.rL ~t 0837
I.--________ ...JIDO not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1
OEN ISON'),t!J ~.:! WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13 rJl Qw.. rtlj AJ ,q:rtde. ;;20/1
Location (well name):L-1 _1_w_}J_-_,'--'q'---_______ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: l~nlJ (/r Wo I J. 4\1 /-r/f
Date and Time for Purgingj'-7_/....:;;~_g_/~'_I"'-' ____ -' and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used:[]]pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event 1 QAo.rte.rl.0 ;\J : +rtliK Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event IL-'-'--:_J _IV_W_-_l_'-I ____ ----'
pH Buffer 7.0 "1.D pH Buffer 4.0 LI.O
Specific ConductanceI-I --,,:~",-q....:.~ ___ --,I!!MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 110.00
Depth to Water Before Purginm 9.-.'81 4" well:137. 3D 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '----------'
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) 1L...L-14 ...... J=.b'_ _____ -' pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 115."0 Redox Potential (Eh) 1-1 ~g-.:.J , __ --oJ TurbiditylL...-,......;17 __ ----J
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling eventll..?3°
Time 11OD~ I Gal. Purged 1 :;s I Time IIOO'i I Gal. Purged 1 6b I
Conductance I \~M I pH I /-~~ I Conductance 11~1~ I pH 17.j.l; I
Temp.oC II~. G,9 I Temp.oC 1105. b J I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 9~9 1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) I q;z::b 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 It I 1 Turbidity (NTU) 117 . J 1
Time 1101i5 I Gal. Purged 1 77 I Time 11011 1 Gal. Purged I sf{ I
Conductance 1 lql1 I pH 17.J.7 I Conductance 1190] I pH 1 "1 ·;l7 I
Temp.oC 1 15.5~ 1 Temp.oC I \S .. S'~ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 9,1..D 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I~C\I I
Turbidity (NTU) 11(; .~ 1 Turbidity (NTU) 11~.g I
White Mesa Mill
~ield Data Worksheet for Groundwater" 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ..... 1 ...... 8L.18""--___ --'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 =1 '--_1:....:....' __ -"
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 17O ·7g 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab! ..... _~_;;:_~ ______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients f2g 0 100 rn1 0 ~ H2SO4 121 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 mI 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 rn1 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 rn1 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) M 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 I2r
CJ1 ~r ;Je. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preserv ati ve:
See instruction
Comment
A (I"';lJe~ on ~;t e <A-t 1000. -Je:nn~r Holl:J:j ~ ~"tA b-c.,(;n f""c~c,J--?or p vCJ e CAY! J/
s..Ii.Mp)l~ -e'-lc.n1. p"'()G b't::.jo.n~:t ID03 fVlr~'(J V)cll for ~ +ot",) of 8'" J.II :Y}Vl7cS
tkJ-"1 l'Il~nlA\c.~ }h( INcll ~t'1/t"J tv 5r;r ~,,~ S,F'",J-hr bl-\..J-kc:rJ-\Ap-S~fI1ph~
Were ~""~'fI "l-10\1, Pu.I"~<" o ... a(l~ tAl-1011. r7-{'rfl1 J.f> w~·h:(" ,+tcr?v. j{ lOb.3~
L~O-~ l-t~ ~+ 1<;;)' 4
L--________ ..... IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
. ATTACHMENTl
OENISOnA ~: WIDTE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
'ji See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13'('{); Q"""y--h:.r JJ:+('(),h. :;;LOI'
Location (well name):IL......-P,--:c_1..._o_-_1 _______ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1;"ne( }t1l1J;J'\j/nt
Date and Time for Purgin~ 7/:ZS / :>-0 I \ and Sampling (if different) 1-1 ~--..-...:'/A....:....-_____ --,
Well Purging Equip Used: [gJpump o@ bailer
Sampling Event IQv.Q.rh:(G3 A),1-("Q.t<..
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductancel'-_q'-'4'-q ___ ---II~MHOSI cm
Depth to Water Before Pur-giogJ 61·~3
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1"""/1\
I ~~LP Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '-_______ -'
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~_o __ -II(.653h)
3" Well:. Q J367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I I g.oq Redox Potential (Eh) I 3 f$';;t Turbidity 1,-_4""--,-·}_-,,
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)l~ 0
Time I O(S~· I Gal.. Purged I b I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ;l..\K3 I pH I 1 . l).b I Conductance I I pH 1 I
Temp.oC I l~.O9 1 Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3~ 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 l\. , 1 Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal.. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater lof;
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ..... 1 __ 6 ____ ..... gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I () T=2V/Q= I c; I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) b 1-___ --1
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0
'-------'
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~ ..... _~_:rA ______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 mI 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 1B 0 100mI 0 171 H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 mI 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 mI 0 0 RN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 IB 0 ~
[.~\Of·I~( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
1-________ ....JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I)A '{I ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
o E N I SO N .'!if j;~t WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL " See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13r J.. Qv..o.ner.N ,'1"1'"0.+<.. ~DI1
Location (well name ):I_! ---,-'P_i C,_"Z.-'"'D'------'-;),. ________ --J
Sampler Name
and initials: f1'AtlJ1~(" HoJJI(.l.~./Tit
Date and Time for Purgin~I_~7/'_'!:25=.L/..:::::;.:..=O.;....I\ ____ __J and Sampling (if different) .tVIA ~~------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [9Jpump o@ bailer
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific ConductanceL-! _4 ...... q~1'--__ --'1 [!MHOSI cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ If{ .8$
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L-I ,Ml_V-_~ _____ ---,
I P;~t.c -3 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I_ _______ ---J
pH Buffer 4.0 !4 Q
Well Depth(O.Olft): L-! ____ ----l
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" Wel1:~-o---iI(.653h)
3" Well:, D . (.367h)
OK,,]
Well Water Temp. (avg) ! \ (O.7fS Redox Potential (Eh)1 3gS Turbidity! 5. CJ
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·C (prior sampling event)! ;)..').0
Time ! Og07 I Gal. Purged 1 b I Time ! I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 515,;),. I pH I g.f.l I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I \6 . 7~ I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ?;K5 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I S,q I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1<--__ 0 ___ --' gallan(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1 0 T=2V/Q= I () 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labll--....v.----CVA..:..-______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients m 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 !'lI
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) -m 0 Sample volume 0 'IE 0
Lh\or'l~( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
Arr'I,)c.&. 01'\ 6;tc. oJ O~OD_ -r(A"I)~r ~"A &o.r";1'\ a...f'C.. prc:.sent +0 (.ollec.t 5~~pJe'~_
Tool.-<-\ Sc.1 or-'Po.'-().yv1~-t~('s. .slArY1fle~ LIJ<.('c!.. ba.;letl ",-,,~ (oJJcc1?J. oJ 080g.
li)o..+e.r u.J~ c.lea., ~ L~ft s;h. ()..t 08' JLL
L...-________ ....IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
I'ield Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
:OENISOJ)~~I ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1 ,
i <'J.' See instruction
I ~ES ----.I FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1310\ Q\J..(Arkr AJ :+(().t~ :100' ,
Location ( well name) :I ..... f,"---, c_z_o_-='5::.....-_______ ----I
Sampler Name
and initials: ITA-nner .J.lo\l;a~;rH
Date and Time for Purginm 7 J~J.:2011 and Sampling (if different) ;J I /J ~~------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [QJ pump 000 bailer
Sampling Event 1 Q"'Q,.r .... h;r)j ,A.);'h·(J\tc.
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0
Specific Conductance ..... 1 ---,4...Lq~-+-__ ----JI!!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ L\ D . () \
Conductance (avg) ::LZS bb '---~~-------~
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) LI _v,.;....:'/A'-'--______ -'
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I-I_~_/A ______ ___'
pH Buffer 4.0 1...\.0
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" Wel1:~_-D_---II(.653h)
3" Well:. 0 ,<.367h)
Well W ater Temp. (avg) 1/.73 Redox Potential (Eh) LI3=-7_Y~_-1 Turbidity I 14. L(
Weather Condo Ext" Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event) I ~o
Time I D7ya I Gal. Purged I b I Time I I Gal. Purged 1 I
Conductance I l.~~k, I pH 1 \'d-. 14 1 Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. DC I \1.13 I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~..,:\ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I ptt\ I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged LI __ D ___ --J gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 0 T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0 <--___ -I
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated ()
'-------'
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL.._~r_V,_I1 ______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 m1 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients m 0 100 m1 0 "El H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 m1 0 0 RN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 m1 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 m1 0 0 RN03 0 0
Other (specify) 1iI 0 Sample volume 0 fa 0 r3
Gh \ 0 r', cXe If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
Af"r:'Il~lA Ot"\ ~i·h~ oJ 07'3.5. -"io.I"IIH:r 8...nJ... CtO\rf":n rn: . .l..Ch+-to ~6J1-ect .5"'fYJph..5 _
\OOV, '.sCo} 0+ P(}.("(N'I1ctcr.s, ~~rVJflt::~ \.)c:1"c. b",~le~ IMel. (o/lec.+<=~ ~ 07Y.5 .
pH of tJ)CA+C.t"" 15 l-J:~h . L.)C\-hr \..VGo.s c.1CeA', LeG .s.lfc. ~t 0755 .
'--_______ ----'\Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAPI
ATTACHMENT 1 OENISONr;,~ ~ i WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
", See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER ----_. --.---.---------.... -,
Description of Sampling Event: 1.3tdx Gv..o...fif }J,tro..t< .2011
Location (well name):1...ILA_W_L_P __________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: I-r;.Mld Boll;J~ /TI1
Date and Time for Purgin~ 7/;;'5/:;"D)1 and Sampling (if different) "'//tr L--___ ~ ___ ~
Well Purging Equip Used: [gJpump o@ bailer
Sampling Event 1&\AAC'"+cr~ Al ;tr&<+(
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific ConductanceL-1 _GJ_q_4 ___ --oII-lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingj .... __ D __ --,
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
I P; t::zo -.:l Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1... ________ --'
pH Buffer 4.0 L-\.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): o
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~_D __ -lI(.653h)
3" Well:. '0 . (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I -::LO.87 Redox Potential (Eh) I 3bJ Turbidity ,-I -'-0 __ ---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 ~ ..
Time I 0 Z:l.3 I Gal. Purged I 0 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I %c>.1 I pH I g .5d-. I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. DC I ;l.D ·~7 I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3hl I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I () I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data WorKsheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ''--_D ____ --' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = , 0 T = 2V/Q = I CI ,
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) C> '---------I
If weB evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated () '---------I
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L.._;1I_!J~'A:'-_____ ---J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 mJ 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 111 0 100ml 0 tl3 H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250m1 0 0 RN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 mJ 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 m1 0 0 RN03 0
Other (specify) (B 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
C,",\Of;~( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
Arr;\J~/A ~'" ~11c. ",-1 og/K. -';'nhcr A"A ~Ar"';1\ fr~_knt +0 collect-,5t;!11f1t:.s .
Too\{ \.sd 0-\ pcAfOlYl4er.s ~:rc:J~ ifl ponol. &r~b ~(Ar>'lp)cS ~crc (OJ)ec1-cJ ~f 08'0l..s~
L~.ft ,s;tc. oJ Og;;'7.
'--________ --"00 not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISOJ)J ~: ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL C', See instruction
MINES · FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13" ax Q \}...()..( h.( .N ~O\= (" 0-;' ~ ~o II
Location (well name ):II--r--'-W:....N_-_b~O=--________ --J
Sampler Name
and initials: I-r;."no· HCJII.'<A~/IH
Date and Time for PurgingJL-..loI~~/~l ~/~;J..:::::o:..:..I.L.) ____ --I and Sampling (if different) 1-1.:....N...::..,y..!..>II$'--_____ ----'
Well Purging Equip Used: I rn Ipump o@ bailer
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific ConductanceL..I_4..L.~.L.9l....-__ ---JI!!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingj,l-__ D __ .....
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
I -rWN-:J.. Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L.. ________ --I
pH Buffer 4.0 y.o
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well :~--o-----iI(.653h)
3" Well :. 0 .(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) ~~.g'-i Redox Potential (Eh) I S4d-. TurbidityLI_O __ ----I
Weather Condo
/J/A Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)12)6
Time IOK Q9 1 Gal. Purged I 1 Time I 1 Gal. Purged I 1
Conductance 116.90 1 pH I-1 -1 Conductance I 1 pH 1 1
Temp. DC 1£·gcl I L\.SO Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I sq~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) 10 I Turbidity (NTU) L ]
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged II-__ o ___ ~ gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gprn. Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1 0 T=2V/Q= 1 () 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) D '--------'
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated c> '-----='------'
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L_~N:...:.J..:JA ______ ....J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients [iI. 0 100ml 0 1]1 H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 mJ 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) [jJ 0 Sample volume 0 IJt 0
Ghloric\(. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
A rri\le~ Of' .~)h:. 0,,1-08'40. 100L< I 5~t-0+ pO.('(.I.M-e1d.5. S"'M?'~~ t.U en .}~ k'(.n "'} ogY5.
LeQ-'srte 0.:\ 08!)D, "lMnu H DII:J~ p'-(~Gn+ +0 GO 11 r!d .s I1fY1F)~S .
P.J.t -e)(-t(~1l1~ Lo~ fo~" ~ ,
P I ~) (An ~ L"b .)-. ;'1~e~t;~L\}~ Dr: 5~ ;,t~M .
'--________ .... 100 not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
121
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I) • ) ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
,,~ \" OENISON ,g~ t~ -., See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 3f"/A Qv.CA.da ' tJ;t1'(I:h: ;2.011
Location (well name): .... 1 _T.:....w.;",:.:..,jJ_-~b=5~ _______ -J
Sampler Name
and initials: I-r;;nn eY' HoI t: ~'V h+J
Date and Time for Pllrgin~ -r J!)..~/ ,9..011 and Sampling (if different) .... IN_I_It _______ --'
Well Purging Equip Used:ITf]pump o@ bailer
pH Buffer 7.0 ],0
Specific Conductance .... 1 --...:..49...L.S-'--__ ---JIIlMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Pu.rgin~ L1~ .'1D
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I "lv..>)J -f5
pH Buffer 4.0 LJ.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1~O.06
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 Ltg.O b 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 .(.367h)
7.~O
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 IS . lOb Redox Potential (Eh)1 9=£3 Turbidity,-I'_(_· g __ --'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·C (prior sampling event)1 .:2.1 p
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time 1 I Gal. Purged 1 I
Conductance I I pH 1 I Conductance I I pH 1 I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal . Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2'
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1-1 _11_0 ___ ----' ga/lon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two ca iog volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1 \0 T = 2V /Q = I l:f. b! I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~1-...;N;.,...;.,.'/~I'l ______ ......
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 Il' H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) IJI 0 Sample volume 0 !2:1 0 Dl
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
of IWAJ--)3
L...-________ ...... IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Qualitv Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISOJ).4 J! ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL .~ See instruction
MINES . FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER .. _. -------_._--------------
Description of Sampling Event: I 'Y'!') Gv~r+cr N;tr;tc .2.0/1
Location (well name):IL--r~w.:..:JJ_· .....:7~D ________ --l
Sampler Name
and initials: 1--r"M'lU ~c>":J~~ J'n~
Date and Time for Purgin~ 7/:;J..$1.2DIJ and Sampling (if different) "1 7~ q J:;o )j
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 Crr UYJt?fR)
I ~LJN-7R Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-_______ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 1.../.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 --,-~q ...... q,--__ ----,I f!MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 105.00
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ 3~.8.b
Conductance (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 ,~. ~3
Weather Condo
Time 1 ()71~ I Gal. Purged I
Conductance I }~lq I pHI
Temp. DC I 15.93 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 95t I
Turbidity (NTU) I 10;2.. j I
Time I I Gal. Purged I
Conductance I I pH I
Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" w ell :llo . .53 1(·653h)
3" Well:L-. _D~_-I. (.367h)
Redox Potential (Eh)1 115~ Turbidity 1 10.:<..'1
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 17'~
Il I Time 1 I Gal. Purged 1 I
7.2'1 I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ..... 1 -,':::,,~,--___ --, gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1-1 --,1,--1 __ -'
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = 1 1. q I 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1.)3
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab! ..... ..Lt'J---<...I,;",.h ______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients []. 0 100ml 0 cr H2SO4 I2i 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) III 0 Sample volume 0 m-0 j,gJ
G~ \O,..',d( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction .\
Comment
'--________ --'IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
TabC
Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Depth to Water Summary
Static
Quarterly Depth to Water
NAME: Tanner Holliday, Garrin Palmer
DATE: 9/20/2011
TIME WELL level TIME WELL
Static
Level TIME WELL
829 MW-l 64.64 1213 MW-4 71.19 844 PIEZ-1
1246 MW-2 109.74 1209 TW4-1 64.45 840 PIEZ-2
1256 MW-3 83.33 1215 TW4-2 67.26 1156 PIEZ-3
1257 MW-3A 85.45 1204 TW4-3 49.53 1230 PIEZ-4
1322 MW-5 106.15 1220 TW4-4 73.01 1234 PIEZ-5
1326 MW-11 88.65 1200 TW4-5 56.08
1319 MW-12 108.40 1223 TW4-6 70.41 1210 TWN-1
1330 MW-14 103.72 1211 TW4-7 67.61 1400 TWN-2
1333 MW-15 106.35 1207 TW4-8 66.77 1214 TWN-3
1252 MW-17 75.51 1202 TW4-9 54.07 1152 TWN-4
836 MW-18 70.25 1158 TW4-10 56.00 830 TWN-5
842 MW-19 51.84 1217 TW4-11 57.59 824 TWN-6
951 MW-20 87.29 1240 TW4-12 39.91 832 TWN-7
944 MW-22 67.20 1242 TW4-13 46.31 822 TWN-8
1251 MW-23 114.26 1245 TW4-14 87.32 847 TWN-9
1226 MW-24 114.45 1156 TW4-15 73.99 818 TWN-10
1340 MW-25 74.56 1326 TW4-16 62.50 812 TWN-11
1156 MW-26 73.99 1328 TW4-17 76.05 810 TWN-12
1221 MW-27 51.11 1207 TW4-18 56.57 848 TWN-13
1235 MW-28 76.88 1405 TW4-19 63.55 851 TWN-14
1242 MW-29 102.22 1154 TW4-20 81.03 816 TWN-15
1239 MW-30 76.35 1204 TW4-21 54.55 856 TWN-16
1333 MW-31 68.75 1152 TW4-22 53.94 855 TWN-17
1328 MW-32 76.05 1224 TW4-23 65.47 1148 TWN-18
1302 MW-33 dry 1150 TW4-24 55.64 807 TWN-19
1304 MW-34 107.80 1202 TW4-25 46.83
1255 MW-35 112.20 1227 TW4-26 64.09
1258 MW-36 110.30
1308 MW-37 109.24
Comments:
Static
Level
61.74
17.79
40.96
48.42
43.21
50.77
16.90
32.10
39.05
69.67
74.59
88.80
61.66
63.41
81.06
69.57
31.80
46.29
62.80
92.12
47.96
34.15
57.80
52.19
TIME
737
740
815
750
747
744
800
803
806
733
755
730
718
715
707
710
725
WELL Static Level
DR-l ABANDON
DR-2 ABANDON
DR-3 MW-36
DR-4 MW-37
DR-5 83.23
DR-6 94.41
DR-7 92.15
DR-8 51.11
DR-9 86.63
DR-10 78.00
DR-11 98.34
DR-12 87.19
DR-13 70.12
DR-14 76.49
DR-15 93.01
DR-16 ABANDON
DR-17 64.85
DR-18 ABANDON
DR-19 63.35
DR-20 55.91
DR-21 101.65
DR-22 DRY
DR-23 70.78
DR-24 43.88
DR-25 ABANDON
/I ((
\1
II #
'\ #.. -. ~=~-
.4-~ b~ ~r
#' II
,I
"
,
~!
,I
II
1/
/'
/1
11 32
II
"
" II
" I' II
II
II
MW-D2
e5503
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
MW-01
e5583
MW-18
e5587
TWN-11 TWN-1i T1 0561~ 056~S;
,,'\. ';jJ1.0
"
05586 TWN-10
?
05584 TWN-9 PI.EZ-~
"5594
1---~ --=:;:::=-
_____ ----552
( ~ ~
-1-21
\ I, ~
o
MW-22
.5450
lW4-1
0 5554
PIEZ-1
g 5594
lWN-4 ~5603
MW-34
-¢-5492
MW-36
~5493
\ \ \ ~~
N '\, '\" '\,
~.s.,80
MW-20
e5453
'\" ~~~ --=--=--=--=-~~:-~ "p--=--=..-.... '-4' --=...--....... -::;, - --=--=--=--=-
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATION
perched monitoring well showing
elevation in feet amsl
temporary perched monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched piezometer showing
elevation in feet arnsl
temporary perched nitrate monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched monitoring well installed
August/September, 2010
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched monitoring well installed April,
2011 showing elevation in feet amsl
~
3000
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
6'.,80
MW-22 " II 50 "/7 //
/7
/7
/7
/7
/7
/7
/7
/7
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19 and TW4-20 are pumping wells
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2011 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
SJS H:/718000/nov11/wI0911.srf
\
/I
({
II
'"
II ~'
~ £..~. ~ =::::::--
-r-7'
I!.,f
1/ "
"
,I ,
~I
" /1
"
" ,I
:1 32
" ,I
I'
"
" II
,I
II
,I
• MIif-21
\1
\\
\\
~ ~
N '~
~ .~ '\:~
MW-02
.5503
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
MW-03
e5472
~$</60
MW-20
.5451
MW-Ol
e5583
MW-18 e5587
" 0561 ~ 056?61 TWN-ll TWN-12/ T
~ro'],.() "
0 5586
TWN-l0
"-
" \
Piez-2 ) Q5610
/
/'
$6:.
/.l-=-=--4' -==-0-/ --
~7
_ 552
~ ~ o
(
~
"
'\ ~ ~----­':::s:::-----'-':,
~ ~-=--=--~-:;::.-4 --=.-=--=--=----=--=-
$</60
o
MW-22
.5450
TW4-1
0 5555
PIEZ-1
~ 5594
TWN-4
~ 5603
MW-34
-<:r 5492
MW-36
~5493
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATION
perched monitoring well showing
elevation in feet amsl
temporary perched monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched piezometer showing
elevation in feet amsl
temporary perched nitrate monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched monitoring well installed
AugusUSeptember, 2010
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched monitoring well installed April,
2011 showing elevation in feet amsl
3000
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
MW-22 '" II
50 '" // //
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19 and TW4-20 are pumping wells
KRIGED 2nd QUARTER, 2011 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
SJS H:/718000/aug11/wI0611.srf D-l
TabE
Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
-Q.
E
.c
..; --CI)
E
i= ... CI) > 0
l CI)
..J ...
CI) -as ;:
'r'" I Z ~
U/W/vO ....-------r---..,....-----,.----,----.-----r----,
L L/vL/60
L L/9~/G0
OL/OL/80 -
OL/G~/LO
60/90/LO
80/8 L/G L -!-----+----I----I------+----+----+-----1
o g o C\i lO
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
I\) I\) ...... ......
01 0 01 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
I
T
07/06/09
E
01/22/10 Z • N :e m S' ...
ID
Ci -08/10/10 0
I
Ci ...
-I _.
3 CD -rr:
tT t 1 1-02/26/11 -3
"C -
09/14/11
'------'--------'------"-------'-------"-, 04/01/12
-a.
E :c
-= -Q)
E
i=
J.. ~
0
CD > Q)
...J
J.. Q) -~
C? Z ~
G ~/W/t>O ,..------,-----,-----,----.----,------,----,.----,-------,
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/9C::RJO -
O~/0~/80
O~/Gc::/W
60/90lLO
80/8 ~/G~ +---t-----+---+--+---+-----i---+---+------I
<D a C')
q ,....
C")
-a.
E -.c
os:: -(I)
E
i= ... (I) > 0 -(I) > (I)
.J ...
(I) -~
~ I Z ~
U/~O/vO
~ ~/v~/60
~ ~/9C:/C:0
o ~/0~/80
o ~/C:C:HO
60/90/LO
80/8 ~/c: ~
II
~
a
cO C')
/
)
/
•
~ ~ '" "
~
/
" " ~ I'.
a o -.t
U') o -.t
-D. E :is ::: -CI)
E
i= ... CI) > 0
~ j ...
~ ;::
it)
I Z ~
~ ~/£G~~ .,.----~---_r_--____;---~---r_--___r_--___,
~ ~/v~/60
l ~/90/90
~ ~/9GIGO
o ~/B ~/~ ~ -
O~/O~/BO -
O~~O/9O
O~RZ/~O
60Iv~/Ol -
60/90/LO -I----I----+------1----I----l------+--------l
co 0> CD
co 0> CD
~ ~/8G!l ~ ,------,-----,--------r-----,------,r------,----,
~ L/17 ~/60
~ ~/90/90
-c.
E ~ ~/9G!l0
..a
;:: -CI)
E t= OL/SLn L ~ ... ~ 0
! CI) o L/OL/SO ..J ...
S ~
U)
I OL!lO/SO Z ~
OL!ll/LO
60/17~/0~
60/90/LO +----I-----/------i----t----r------I---------i
-a.
E -.c
-= -CI)
E
i= ... CI) > 0
(j) > CI)
...J ...
CI) -~ ..... I Z ~
~ ~/v~/60
~ ~/90/90
~ ~/9c/cO
o ~/B ~/~ ~
0~/0~/80
0~/cO/90
60/v~/0~
60/90/LO
-
-
a
cx:i GO
\
a en GO
~
/
\
a c:i en
q
T""" en
q
C\J en
a ttl en
a ~ en
a Il'i en
a cO en
,.
a
cx:i en
0)
U1 o
~
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
~ o
U1 U1 o
U1 o o
--~ r-----_
~ ~ ~ ..---
~
~
~
~
c!;; o
~ o o
-
-
-
07/06/09
10/14/09
01/22/10
05/02110
08/10/10
11/18/10
02126/11
06/06/11
09/14/11
12123/11
~ Z I co ;= -CD ""I
r-CD < CD
0
Ci ...
-f -.' 3 CD -= .
C" -3
"C -
0) ()1
0,
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
B i i ffi o 0, a 0,
0) w o
I------+-----+------+------t-------+I 07/06/09
10/14/09
01/22/10
05/02/10
08/10/10
-11/18/10
-02126/1 1
06/06/11
09/14/11
I-____ L-____ L--____ L....-___ ----J'--___ --'-12123/11
i I CD
=e a CD .,
r ~,
CD -~ .,
-I _.
3 CD
~
2:
3
"C -
-a.
E
.c
-= -CD E
i= ...
CD > 0
CD > CD ...J ...
CD -~
0
T""
I Z ~
~ ~/v~/60
~ ~/90/90
~ ~/9G/GO
O~/B~H ~
O~/O~/BO
O~/GO/gO
O~/GG/~O
60/v~/0~
60/90/LO
-
00 o 00
~
\
\
'\
'\
~ .-
00
"" ~ ~ ~ ~
cq
(\j 00
o crj
00
'" I\)
b
"I ......
<.n
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
'" ......
b 2l tn '" o b
0> co tn
0> co b
1-----+----+-----+-----\-----+----+1 07/06/09
10/14/09
01/22110
05/02110
08/1 0/10
-11/18/10
02/26/11
06/06111
-09/14/11
L ___ L-___ L-___ .l-___ -'--___ .L..-__ ------'-12123/11
~.
Z I ...... ......
;e
S» -CD .,
r ~ -~ CD '.,
::1 3 CD -i=
2:
3
"tJ -
iii ~ a 0 0
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
~ c.> I\) I\) ...... .....
0 Of 0 01 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 01 0 o o
I----I---+----+---+---+---+---+-----.,f----+I 07/06/09
10/14/09
01/22/10
05/02110
08/10/10
11/18/10
02/26/11
06/06/11
• 09/14/11
I--__ '--_----ll.-_----l __ ---' __ ---' __ ---'-__ ---'-__ ---'-__ ----'-12/23/11
~ Z I' ......
N
=e a CD ...
r-CD < !!.
0
Ci ....
::t 3
CD ..-. :=
C" 3"
'tl -
~ ~/£Z/Z ~ .,...-----.----..,.-----.----,-------,,----,----,
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/90/90
-c.
E ~ ~/9ZIlO ::a
= -(\)
E t= o ~/8 ~/L L ... ~ 0
Q;
j O~/O~/BO -.... (\) -~
('II) ,...
I O~/ZO/SO Z ~
60/t> ~/OL
60/90/LO +----+---+-----I----I----/-----t----i
-Q.
E -.c . £
CD E
1=
~ CD > 0
"i > ~
~ CD ...
. ~
~ ,....
I Z ~
~ ~/8"l,/"l,~ ...----r----.----,------,---r------,---r-----,
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/90/90
~ ~/9"l,/GO
O k/B~/~~
O~/O~/BO
O~/GO/9O
60Iv~/O~
60/901LO -t-----I----+----+-----1----+----+----+---I
<0 C\i <0
~ 00 m 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m g g
("II) ~U!Od Bu!.tnSeaw N\olae 41daa
-c.
E -.c
-= -Q)
E
i= ... ~ 0
'ii > j ...
Q) -~
it) ,..
I Z ~
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/90/90
~ ~/9G!G0
O~/B~/~ ~
O~/O~/BO
O~!GO/SO
60Iv~/0~
60/90/LO
-
o o CO
~
...
o 0 q q 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~
("U) ~U!Od BU!Jnseew MOles 4tdea
"
~ ~/90/90
-
1\
~ a;
E ~ ~/9G/GO :a
S
CP E
i= O~/B~/~ ~ "-CD >
>
\
0 • CP > CD ..J O~/O~/BO ...
CP -~
CD ,....
I O~/GO/9O Z .~
O~/GG/~O
~~
~ ~ ~ ~
60/t~/O~
60/90/LO
o ~ V ~ ro 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
('y) lUIOd 6u!Jnseall\l MOlaa 1I1daa
L L/vL/60 \
L L/90/90 1\
-D-
E L L/9C::IGO :c -
• = -Q)
E
i= OL/B L/L L ... ~ 0
Gi
~ ~
> Q)
..J OL/OL/SO ... Q) ... ~ ..... ,..
I OLIGO/SO Z ~ ~ "-.
~ ~
60IvL/OL -
60/90/LO
N ~ m 00 0 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
("II) IU!Od 6u!Jnseaw M.Olas 41daa
Cl
(:)
(1) o o
Depth Below Measuring Po,int (ft.)
VI o o
~ [7
./
~
~ o
~ ~ :>
~/ V
OJ o o .~ o
..... o o o (:)
·
·
·
----
07/06/09
10/14/09
01/22/10
05/02110
08/1 0/10
11/18/10
02/26/11
06/06/11
09/14/11
12/23/11
~ Z
I ~ co
~ -(I)
""'I
r-(I)
[
0 < (I)
""'I
::I
3 (I) -~
2:
3
"C -
~ ~/v~/60
~ ~/90/90
-D-
E -~ ~/9G/CO .c
;:: -CD E
i= O~/B~/~ ~ L. ~ 0
~ CD ..J O~/O~/BO
L. CD 1U
== en ,....
I O~/GOI90 Z ~
O~/C:G/~O
60/v~/O~
60/90/LD
-
q
C\J 1.0
""
1\
~ ~ ~ I'-.
o Il'i 1.0
1.0 lfi 1.0
TabF
Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-WelJ TWN-l
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,646.96 5648.09 1.13 11 2.5
5600.38 02/06/09 47.71 46.58
5599.99 07/21109 48.10 46.97
5600.26 09121 /09 47.83 46.70
5,601.L0 J0128/09 46.99 45.86
5602.59 12114/09 45.50 44.37
5,600.55 03/11 /10 47.54 46.41
5,600.66 05/11/10 47.43 46.30
5,599.18 09129/10 48.91 47.78
5,598.92 1 212 i/J 0 49.17 48.04
5,598.29 02128111 49.80 48.67
5,597.80 06/21 /11 50.29 49.16
5,597.32 09/20/11 50.77 49.64
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-2
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,625.75 5,626.69 0.94 95
5,611.37 02/06/09 15.32 14.38
5,610.63 07/21 /09 16.06 15.12
5,609.73 09121/09 16.96 16.02
5,607.08 11102/09 19.61 18.67
5,606.57 12/14/09 20.12 19.18
5612.45 0311 'III 0 14.24 13.30
5,612.78 05111 /10 13.91 12.97
5,611.37 09/29110 15.32 14.38
5610.24 1212 1/10 16.45 15.51
5,610.64 02/28/11 16.05 15 .11
5,609.78 06/21/11 16.91 15 .97
5609.79 09/20/1 I 16.90 15.96
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN-3
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation urface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5633.64 5,634.50 0.86 110
5,603.77 02/06/09 30.73 29.87
5602.37 07/21 /09 32.13 31 .27
5,602.34 09/21/09 32.16 31.30
5602.60 10/28/09 31 .90 31.04
5603.12 12/14/09 31.38 30.52
5,602.90 03/1.11 10 31.60 30.74
5,603.23 0511111 0 31.27 30.41
5,602.86 09/291'10 31.64 30.78
5603.35 12/2 LIIO 31.15 30.29
5,602.89 02/2 811 L 31.61 30.75
5,602.75 06121 /11 31.75 30.89
5,602.40 09/20/11 32. LO 31.24
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-4
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (L D) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSO) Well
5641.04 5641.87 0.83 136
5,601.47 02/06/09 40.40 39.57
5604.26 07/21 /09 37.61 36.78
5605.02 09121/09 36.85 36.02
5,605.87 10/28/09 36.00 35.17
5,605.81 12/14/09 36.06 35.23
5,605.31 03/11/10 36.56 35 .73
5 605.36 05 /11 /10 36.51 35.68
5,604.59 09/29/10 37.28 36.45
5,604.42 1212\11 0 37.45 36.62
5603.69 02/28111 38.18 37.35
5,603.36 06/21111 38.51 37.68
5602.82 09/20/11 39.05 38.22
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN-5
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (bhv.MP) (bhv.LSD) Well
5,653 .70 5,655.18 1.48 155
5,584.43 08/25109 70.75 69.27
5,584.51 09/21109 70.67 69.19
5,584.54 11110/09 70.64 69.16
5,584.62 12114/09 70.56 69.08
5,584.97 03111110 70.21 68.73
5585.38 05/11110 69.80 68.32
5,585.35 09/29/10 69.83 68.35
5585.42 12/21/10 69.76 68.28
5,585.08 02/28/11 70.10 68.62
5,585.38 06/21/11 69.80 68.32
5,585.5 1 09/20/11 69.67 68.19
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN-6
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation urface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,663.03 5,664.94 1.91 135
5,589.52 08/25109 75.42 73 .51
5,589.46 09122/09 75.48 73 .57
5,589.61 11 /03 /09 75.33 73.42
5589.92 12/14/09 75.02 73 .11
5,590.24 03/11110 74.70 72.79
5590.40 05111110 74.54 72.63
5,590.24 09/29/10 74.70 72.79
5590.49 12/2111 0 74.45 72.54
5,590.16 02/28/11 74.78 72.87
5590.44 06/21 /11 74.50 72.59
5,590.35 09120/11 74 .59 72.68
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN-7
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation urface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5647.39 5,649.26 1.87 120
5,552.56 08/25/09 96.70 94.83
5,558.34 09121.109 90.92 89.05
5,558.82 11110/09 90.44 88.57
5558.96 12114/09 90.30 88.43
5559.54 03/11 /10 89.72 87.85
5,559.60 05/11110 89.66 87.79
5,559.83 09/29/10 89.43 87.56
5,559.00 12/21 /10 90.26 88.39
5,559.68 02/28111 89.58 87.71
5,560.43 06/21 /11 88.83 86.96
5,560.46 09120/11 88.80 86.93
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa MiIl-Well TWN-8
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Laud Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation urface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Ri er (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,649.35 5,65 1.48 2.13 160
5,589.01 08/25/09 62.47 60.34
5,589.10 09/2 1/09 62.38 60.25
5589.09 11 /03/09 62.39 60.26
5,603.38 12/14/09 48.10 45.97
5,589.68 03/11110 6 1.80 59.67
5,589.95 05111 /10 61.53 59.40
5,589.74 09129110 61.74 59.6 L
5,589.97 1212 1/10 61 .51 59.38
5,589.67 02/28/11 6 1.81 59.68
5,589.96 06/21 /11 61.52 59.39
5,589.82 09120/11 6L.66 59.53
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-9
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.L D) Well
5,645 .68 5647.45 1.77 102.5
5582.05 08125/09 65.40 63.63
5,582.1 2 09/22/09 65.33 63.56
5582.27 11/10/09 65.18 63.4 1
5,582.53 12114/09 64.92 63.15
5,582.92 03/11 /10 64 .53 62.76
5,583.06 05/11110 64.39 62.62
5,583.25 09/29/10 64.20 62.43
5583.57 12/21/10 63 .88 62.11
5,583.54 02128/11 63.91 62.14
5,583.92 06/21/1 L 63 .53 61.76
5,584.04 09/20/11 63.4 1 61.64
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN-IO
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (bhv.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5664.63 5666.98 2.35 107.5
5584.18 08125/09 82.80 80.45
5584.40 09/22/09 82.58 80.23
5584.61 11 /10/09 82.37 80.02
5,584.90 12/14/09 82.08 79.73
5,585.21 03 /! 1110 81.77 79.42
5,585.42 05/11/10 81.56 79.21
5585.42 09/29/10 81.56 79.21
5585.68 12/21 /10 81.30 78.95
5,585.60 02128/1 J 81.38 79.03
5,585.95 0612 1111 81.03 78.68
5585.92 09120/11 81.06 78 .71
Water Levels and Data over Time
White MesaMill-Well TWN-ll
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation urface Elevation Length Of DateO! Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,683.16 5,684.53 1.37 147.5
5,613.00 11 /03/09 71.53 70.16
5,613.88 12/14/09 70.65 69:28
5,614.65 03111110 69.88 68.51
5615.16 05111110 69.37 68.00
5,6 14.93 09/29/10 69.60 68.23
5,615.09 12/21110 69.44 68.07
5,6 14.96 02/28/11 69.57 68.20
5,615.12 06/21111 69.41 68.04
5,614.96 09/20/11 69.57 68.20
Water LevelS and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN-12
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation SUI'face Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.L D) Well
5,667.03 5,668.24 1.2 1 11 5
5,628.33 11/03/09 39.91 38.70
5,628.86 12/14/09 39.38 38.17
5,630.27 03/11 11 0 37 .97 36.76
5,63 1.64 0511 1/10 36.60 35.39
5,633.73 09129/10 34.51 33.30
5,633.43 1212 1/10 34.81 33.60
5 634.35 02128/11 33 .89 32.68
5 635.95 0612 111 \ 32.29 3 1.08
5,636.44 09/20/11 3 1.80 30.59
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-13
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surrace Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Oeptb or
(WL) (LSO) (MP) Riser (L) MonitoriD~ (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5633.04 5,634.32 1.28 120
5,586.95 11/03 /09 47.37 46.09
5 587.22 12/14/09 47.10 45.82
5 587.45 03/11110 46.87 45.59
5587.64 05/11110 46.68 45.40
5,587.37 09/29/10 46.95 45.67
5,587.77 12/21110 46.55 45.27
5,587.64 02/28111 46.68 45.40
5 587.89 06/21/11 46.43 45.15
5,588.03 09/20/11 46.29 45.01
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-14
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Oepth to Total
Elevation Surfac;e Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.80 5649.53 1.73 135
5,586.18 11 /04/09 63.35 61.62
5,586.5'1 12114/09 63.02 61.29
5,586.71 03111 /10 62.82 61 .09
5586.72 05/11 /10 62.81 61 .08
5,586.53 09/29/10 63.00 61 .27
5586.80 12/21/10 62.73 61.00
5,586.74 02/28/11 6'2.79 61.06
5586.84 06/2111\ 62.69 60.96
5586.73 09/20111 62.80 61.07
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN-15
TotaJ or
M.easuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface EJevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5675.01 5676.49 1.48 155
5,594.12 11 /10/09 82.37 80.89
5,584.03 12(14/09 92.46 90.98
5,584.10 03111/10 92.39 90.91
5,584.16 05/1 III 0 92.33 90.85
5,584.26 09129110 92.23 90.75
5,584.30 12/21 /10 92.19 90.71
5,584.04 02128/11 92.45 90.97
5584.30 06121 /11 92.19 90.71
5,584.37 09/20/11 92.12 90.64
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-16
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,65l.07 5,652.70 l.63 100
5,603.34 11104/09 49.36 47.73
5,603.56 12114/09 49.14 47.51
5,603.84 03111110 48.86 47.23
5,604.31 05/11110 48.39 46.76
5,604.28 09/29110 48.42 46.79
5,604.39 12/2111 0 48.31 46.68
5,604.20 02/28/11 48.50 46.87
5,604.55 06/21111 48.15 46.52
5,604.74 09/20/11 47.96 46.33
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa MiIl-Well TWN~17
Total or
Measuring Measllred Total
Water Land l'oint Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (L D) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.L D) Well
5,639.73 5,641.55 1.82 100
5,605.96 11 /04/09 35.59 33.77
5,606.27 12/14/09 35.28 33.46
5,606.25 03/11 /10 35.30 33.48
5606.55 05/1 1110 35.00 33.1 8
5606.77 09/29/10 34.78 32.96
5,607.15 12/2 III 0 34.40 32.58
5606.96 02128/1 1 34.59 32.77
5,607.22 06121/11 34.33 32.51
5607.40 09120/11 34.15 32.33
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN -18
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation urface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,643.95 5645.45 1.50 100
5,586.85 11/02/09 58.60 57.10
5,600.14 121 14/09 45.31 43.81
5,587.36 03111110 58.09 56.59
5,587.71 05/11110 57.74 56.24
5,587.50 09129/10 57.95 56.45
5,607.66 12/21/10 37.79 36.29
5,587.35 02128/11 58.10 56.60
5,587.71 06/21111 57.74 56.24
5587.65 09/20/11 57.80 56.30
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-19
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point De.pth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth or
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.L 0) Well
5,659.59 5,661.36 1.77 110
5,606.17 11 /02/09 55.19 53 .42
5,606.70 12/14/09 54.66 52.89
5,607.22 03111/10 54.14 52.37
5,607.89 05111110 53.47 51.70
5,607.98 09/29110 53.38 5 1.61
5,608.41 12/21110 52.95 51.1 8
5,608.49 02/28/11 52.87 5 1.1 0
5,608.60 06/21111 52 .76 50.99
5,609.17 09120111 52.19 50.42
TabG
Laboratory Analytical Reports
EI\ERGY
..... t-1Ufl/\IOHI! OJ
l'/WN.energylab.com
AMIytbI~sme. IW
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, sIl888-&72-1225 • Coliega Station, 1X 888-&80-2218
ANAL VTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
August 11 , 2011
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C11080096
Project Name: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2011
Quote ID: C3317 -Nitrate and Chloride Sampling
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 30 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 8/2/2011 for analysis.
Sample 10 Client Sample 10 Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C11080096-001 TWN-8R 07/26/11 6 :40 08/02/11 Aqueous Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
C11080096-002 TWN-11R 07/27/11 12 :09 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-003 TWN-7R 07/28/11 7 :05 08102/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-004 TWN-8 07/26/11 7:23 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-005 TWN-13 07/26/11 8 :24 08102/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-006 TWN-5 07/26/11 9:31 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-007 TWN-1 07/26/11 10:25 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-008 TWN-4 07/26/11 11 :19 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-009 TWN-12 07/26/11 12: 16 08102/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11 080096-01 0 TWN-10 07/27/11 6:25 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-011 TWN-11 07/27/11 12 :41 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-012 TWN-6 07/27/11 13 :33 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-013 TWN-16 07/27/11 14:23 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-014 TWN-15 07/28/11 6:21 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-015 TWN-7 07/29/11 10: 15 08102/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-016 TWN-18 07/28/11 8:29 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-017 TWN-14 07/29/11 10:43 08102/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-018 TWN-19 07/28/11 10:11 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-019 TWN-17 07/29/11 10:51 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-020 TWN-9 07/29/11 10:37 08102/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-021 TWN-3 07/29 /11 10:30 08102/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-022 TWN-2 07/28/11 14:27 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C 11080096-023 TWN-65 07/26/11 8:24 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-024 TWN-70 07/29/11 10: 15 08102/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-025 TWN-60 08/01 /11 8:45 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-026 Piez-1 07/25/11 8:35 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-027 Piez-2 07/25/11 8:08 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-028 Piez-3 07/25/11 7:45 08/02/11 Aqueous Same As Above
Page 1 of 17 ,/
EN:RGY .'
L:\HOHJ·~I CHIL'S
C11080096-029 UWLP
www.energylab.com
AI/IJytJaI rxern-. SIne. 1JS2
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 801-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 811-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 886-&12-1225 • College StatiDn, lX 8Ba-690-2218
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
07/25/11 8 :25 08102/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11080096-030 Temp Blank 08/01/11 0:00 08/02/11 Aqueous Temperature
This report was prepared by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601 . Any exceptions
or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the
Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. All samples are reported on an as received
basis unless otherwise indicated. Samples corrected for dry weight indicate units that have -dry appended.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By: c5¥~ £; tJcJ.~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2011.08.11 15:25:26 -06:00
Page 2 of 17
www.energylab.com
Au/fIkM w./t.n Slnu 'flU
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Gasper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillotte, WY 8&&-&8&-7175 • Rapid CI ,SO 888-672-1225 • Colloge Station, 1X 888-690-2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2011 Report Date: 08/11/11
Sample Delivery Group: C11080096 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4"C (±2"C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service . Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SD
eli-! -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641 , Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001; Utah: 3072350515; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C1903
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 3 of 17
EN:RGY
• I\I]Or'AIOI~11 ~
www.energylab.com
~EzuIIMt:tSblu 1m Helena, MT 877·472·0711 • Billings, MT 800-735·4489 • Casper, WY 118-235-0515
Gillette, WY 886·&88·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·&72·1225 • Collage Station, IX 888·610-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2011 Report Date: 08/11 III
Lab 10: Cl1080096-001 Collection Date: 07/26/11 06:40
Client Sample 10: TWN-8R DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers Rl Qel Method AnalysiS Date I By
MAJOR IONS
Chloride NO mg/L A4500-CI B 08/08/11 10:25 I we
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N NO mg/L 0.1 E353.2 OB/03/11 14:42 I de
Lab 10: Cl1080096-002 Collection Date: 07/27/11 12:09
Client Sample 10: TWN-llR DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers Rl Qel Method Analysis Date / By
MAJOR IONS
Chloride NO mg/L 1 A4500-CI B 08/08/11 10:30 / we
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N NO mg/L 0.1 E353.2 08/03/1 1 14:44/ de
Lab 10: Cll080096-003 Collection Date: 07/28/11 07 :05
Client Sample 10: TWN-7R DateRecelved: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers Rl Qel Method Analysis Date I By
MAJOR IONS
Chloride NO mg/L A4500-CI B 08/08/11 10:32 / we
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N NO mg/L 0.1 E353.2 OB/03/11 16:09 / de
Lab 10: Cl1080096-004 Collection Date: 07/26/11 07:23
Client Sample 10: TWN-8 DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers Rl Qel Method Analysis Date / By
MAJOR IONS
Chloride 18 mg/L A4500-CI B 08/08/11 10:36/ we
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N NO mg/L 0.1 E353.2 08/03/11 16:12 / de
Report RL -Analyte reporting limit. MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
Definitions: QCL -Quality control limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 17
EN:RGY
• I") C>rl 1\ I or~1l "';'
www.energylab.com
AM/rfDI buIIHu smc. 1152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WV888-235-0515
Gillette, WV8B6-1Ii8B-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-221 B
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2011
Lab 10: C11080096-005
Client Sample 10: TWN-13
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab 10: C11080096-006
Client Sample 10: TWN-5
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab 10: C11080096-007
Client Sample 10: TWN-1
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab 10: C11080096-008
Client Sample 10: TWN-4
Anatyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Report RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Definitions: QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
49
0.1
Result
44
0.3
Result
14
0.5
Result
35
1.1
Report Date: 08/11/11
Collection Date: 07/26/11 08:24
OateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Units Qualifiers Rl Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
mg/L A4500-CI B 08/08/11 10:44/ we
mg/L 0.1 E353.2 08/03/11 16:14/ de
Collection Date: 07/26/11 09:31
OateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Units Qualifiers Rl Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
mg/L A4500-CI B 08/08/11 10:46 1 we
mg/L 0.1 E353.2 08/03/11 16:171 de
Collection Date: 07/26/11 10:25
OateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Units Qualifiers Rl Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
mg/L A4500-CI B 08/08/11 10:491 we
mg/L 0.1 E353.2 08/03/11 16:19/ de
Collection Date: 07/26/11 11 :19
OateRecelved: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Units Qualifiers Rl Qel Method Analysis Date 1 By
mg/L A4500-CI B 08/08/11 10:52 1 we
mg/L 0.1 E353.2 08/04/11 15:17 1 de
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 5 of 17
EN:RGY
• ~'\t·;O'~,~1 CHIL S
www.entrgylab.com
~EBIIIItnSlItu 1m
Halena, hIT B77·472·0711 • BlliinKs, MT BOO-735·44B9 · Gasper, WY 888·235-0515
Gillette, WY 886·&86·7175 . Rapid City, SO 888·&72·1225 • ColleKe Station, TX 888·&80-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2011 Report Date: 08/11/11
Lab 10: C11080096-009 Collection Date: 07/26/1112:16
Client Sample 10: TWN-12 DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
MAJOR IONS
Chloride 102 mg/l 1 A4500-CI B 08/08/1110:58/wc
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 0.6 mg/l 0.1 E353.2 08/04/11 15:191 dc
Lab 10: C11 080096-01 0 Collection Date: 07/27/11 06:25
Client Sample 10: TWN-10 DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
MAJOR IONS
Chloride 28 mglL 1 A4500-CI B 08/08/11 11: 11 I wc
Nitrogen, Nitrale+Nitrite as N 0.1 mg/l 0.1 E353.2 08/04/11 15 :22 I dc
Lab 10: C11080096-011 Collection Date: 07/27/11 12:41
Client Sample 10: TWN-11 DateRecelved: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
MAJOR IONS
Chloride 76 mg/l I A4500-CI B 08/08/11 11 :13/ wc
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 0.1 mg/l 0.1 E353.2 08/04/11 15 :24 I dc
Lab 10: C11080096-012 Collection Date: 07/27/11 13:33
Client Sample 10: TWN-6 DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
MAJOR IONS
Chloride 17 mg/l 1 A4500-CI B 08/08/11 11 : 16 I wc
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nilrite as N 1.1 mg/l 0.1 E353.2 08/04/11 15 :29 I dc
Report Rl -Analyle reporting limit. Mel - Maximum contaminant level.
Definitions: QCl -Quality control limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 17
E"I:RGY
~i\.UOHI\IC:JHl ~>
www.energylab.com
AM/tIkM buIIa:t $/x, 1151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8BB-&8B-7175 • Rapid City, SO 188-&72-1225 . College Station, IX 888-&10-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2011
Lab 10: e11080096-013
Client Sample ID: TWN-16
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab 10: e11080096-014
Client Sample 10: TWN-15
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
lab 10: e11080096-015
Client Sample ID: TWN-7
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab 10: e11080096-016
Client Sample 10: TWN-18
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
31
2.4
Result
47
1.6
Result
5
0.7
Result
65
1.8
Units
mg/L
mg/L
Units
mg/L
mg/l
Units
mg/L
mg/l
Units
mg/l
mg/L
Report Date: 08/11/11
Collection Date: 07/27/11 14:23
DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCLI
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
1 A4500-CI B OBIOBlll 11: 1 B I we
0.1 E353.2 OB/04/11 15 :32 I de
Collection Date: 07/28/11 06:21
DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
1 A4500-CI B OBIOBlll 11 :21 I we
0.1 E353.2 OB/04/11 15:34 1 de
Collection Date: 07/29/11 10:15
DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers RL QCl Method Analysis Date I By
1 A4500-CI B OBIOBll1 11 :23 I we
0.1 E353.2 OB/04/11 15 :37 I de
Collection Date: 07/28/11 08 :29
DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
1 A4500-CI B 08/08/11 11 :25 I we
0.1 E353.2 OB/04/11 15 :39 I de
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7 of 17
EN:RGY
_l\fl:':)l iA IOHI~·.
www.energylab.com
Aiulylla/~SItJe. 1m
Halena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-&8&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-&BO-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2011 Report Date: 08/11/11
LablD: Cll080096-017 Collection Date: 07/29/11 10:43
Client Sample ID: TWN-14 DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QeL Method Analysis Date I By
MAJOR IONS
Chloride 25 mg/L 1 A4500-CI B 08/08/11 11 :28 I we
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 3.5 mglL 0.1 E353.2 08/04/11 15 :52 I de
Lab ID: Cll080096-018 Collection Date: 07/28/11 10:11
Client Sample ID: TWN-19 DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QeL Method Analysis Date I By
MAJOR IONS
Chloride 113 mglL 1 A4500-CI B 08/08/11 11 :34 I we
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 7.1 mg/L D 0.5 E353.2 08/04/11 15:541 de
Lab ID: Cl1080096-019 Collection Date: 07/29/11 10:51
Client Sample ID: TWN-17 DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MeLI
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QeL Method Analysis Date I By
MAJOR IONS
Chloride 74 mg/L 1 A4500-CI B 08/08/11 11 :40 I we
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 8.5 mg/L D 0.5 E353.2 08/04/11 15:57 I de
Lab ID: Cll080096-020 Collection Date: 07/29/11 10:37
Client Sample ID: TWN-9 DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MeLI
Analyses Result Units Qualifiers RL QeL Method Analysis Date I By
MAJOR IONS
Chloride 208 mg/L A4500-CI B 08/08/11 12 :00 I we
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 11.0 mg/L D 0.5 E353.2 08/04/11 15 :59 / de
Report RL -Analyte reporting limit. MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
Definitions: QCL -Quality control limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 8 of 17
EN:RGY
, ~~.[l()H;\rOHIl ",
WWN.energylab.com
AM/tfIeM £xuIIfta SIIIC, flU
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WY 888·235·D515
GilieHe, WY 8&&·18&·7175 • Rapid City, so 888·672-1225 • College Station, IX 888·&10·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2011
Lab ID: C11080096-021
Client Sample ID: TWN-3
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C11080096-022
Client Sample ID: TWN-2
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C11080096-023
Client Sample ID: TWN-65
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C11080096-024
Client Sample 10: TWN-70
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
134
25
Result
74
33
Result
49
0.1
Result
5
0.7
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/L
mg/L
Units
mg/L
mg/L
Units
mg/L
mg/L
Units
mg/L
mg/L
Report Date: 08/11/11
Collection Date: 07/29/11 10:30
DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 08/08/11 12 :05 1 we
D E353.2 08/04/11 16 :02 1 de
Collection Date: 07/28/11 14:27
DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 08/08/11 12:071 we
D 2 E353.2 08/04/11 16:071 de
Collection Date: 07/26/11 08:24
DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 08/08/11 12:131 we
0.1 E353.2 08/04/11 16 :09 1 de
Collection Date: 07/29/11 10:15
OateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
1 A4500-CI B 08/08/11 12:161 wc
0.1 E353.2 08/04/11 16:121 de
MeL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 17
EN:RGY .'
, I\L .. Q P /\IO J .. 1t ~
www.energylab.com
AM/fIbI ExuIIwu:t SIIIu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-&8&-7175 • Rapid City, so 888-&72-1225 . College Slatlon,1X 888-6BO-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Nitrate 2011
LablD: C11080096-025
Client Sample ID: TWN-60
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C11080096-026
Client Sample ID: Piez-1
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C11080096-027
Client Sample ID: Piez-2
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
LablD: C11080096-028
Client Sample ID: Piez-3
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
Result
53
7.0
Result
9
0.1
Result
61
1.B
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/L
mg/l
Units
mg/L
mg/l
Units
mg/L
mg/L
Units
mg/l
mg/l
Qualifiers RL
1
0.1
Qualifiers RL
D 0.5
Qualifiers RL
1
0.1
Qualifiers RL
1
0.1
MCLt
QCL
MCLt
QCL
Report Date: 08/11/11
Collection Date: 08/01/11 08:45
DateRecelved: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Method Analysis Date I By
A4500-CIB OB/OB/1112:1B /wc
E353.2 OB/04/11 16:14 I de
Collection Date: 07/25/11 08 :35
DateRecelved: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Method Analysis Date I By
A4500-CI B OB/OB/11 12 :20 I we
E353.2 OB/04/11 16:171 dc
Collection Date: 07/25/11 08:08
DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCLt
QCL Method Analysis Date I By
A4500-CI B OB/08/11 12 :22 I wc
E353.2 OB/04/11 16:32 I dc
Collection Date: 07/25/11 07:45
DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCLt
QCL Method Analysis Date I By
A4500-CI B OB/OB/11 12:251 wc
E353.2 08/04/11 16:34 I dc
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 10 of 17
EN:RGY
l\l:OJ"'I\IC'~I: !~
www.energylab.com
AMIytJu/ ExcM/I/lCt SiIlCi '951
Helena, lofT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillatte, WY 8&&-&86-7175 • Rapid City, so 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 881-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Nitrate 2011
Lab ID: C11080096-029
Client Sample ID: UWLP
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Lab ID: C11080096-030
Client Sample ID: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
Definitions: QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
NO
Result
5.2
Units
mg/L
mg/l
Units
'C
MCL!
Qualifiers RL QCL
0.1
MCL!
Qualifiers RL QCL
Report Date: 08/11/11
Collection Date: 07/25/11 08:25
DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CI B 08/08/11 12 :27 / wc
E353.2 08/04/11 16:371 dc
Collection Date: 08/01/11
DateReceived: 08/02/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Method Analysis Date 1 By
E170.1 08/02/11 09:051 kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 11 of 17
EN:RGY www.energylab.com Helena, MT 817-472-0111 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillotto, WY 8&&-&86-1175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-&80-2218 AHon~\I OH'1I ~ AIrMytIa/ &uIIetrt:B S/nu 1m
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 08/11/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2011 Work Order: C11080096
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: A4500-CI B Batch: 8/8/2011-CL-TTR-W
Sample 10: MBLK9-8/8/2011 Method Blank Run: TITRATION_11 0808A 08/08/11 10:09
Chloride ND mg/L 0.5
Sample 10: C11080096-009A Sample Matrix Spike Run: TITRATION_11 0808A 08/08/11 11 :05
Chloride 286 mg/L 1.0 104 90 110
Sample 10: C11080096-009A Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TITRA TI ON_11 0808A 08/08/11 11 :08
Chloride 286 mg/L 1.0 104 90 110 0.0 10
Sample 10: C11080096-019AMS Sample Matrix Spike Run : TITRATION_11 0808A 08/08/11 11 :45
Chloride 261 mg/L 1.0 106 90 110
Sample 10: C11080096-019AMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run : TITRATION_110808A 08/08/11 11 :48
Chloride 261 mg/L 1.0 106 90 110 0.0 10
Sample 10: LCS35-8/8/2011 Laboratory Control Sample Run: TITRATION_110808A 08/08/11 11 :52
Chloride 3530 mg/L 1.0 100 90 110
Sample 10: C11080096-029AMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: TITRATION_110808A 08/08/11 12:29
Chloride 38.8 mg/L 1.0 110 90 110
Sample 10: C11080096-029AMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TITRATION_110808A 08/08/11 12:31
Chloride 38.8 mg/L 1.0 110 90 110 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limi!. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 12 of 17
EI'ERGY
..... I:lOr-i .. '\TOr ... ll "J
www.energylab.com
~~SInt:.,m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • BIllings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillotto, WY 8&&-&8&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College StatiDn, TX 888-610-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 08/11/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Nitrate 2011 Work Order: C11080096
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
Method: E353.2 Batch: R148890
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method Blank Run: TECHNICON_11 0803A 08/03/11 12:27
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N ND mg/L 0.06
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample Run: TECHNICON_11 0803A 08/03/11 12 :29
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.62 mg/L 0.10 105 90 110
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: TECHNICON_11 0803A 08/03/11 12:32
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.90 mg/L 0.10 97 90 110
Sample 10: C11080096-0D2BMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: TECHNICON_11 0803A 08/03/11 14:47
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.84 mg/L 0.10 94 90 110
Sample 10: C110BOO96-OD2BMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TECHNICON_11 0803A 08/03/11 14:49
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.93 mg/L 0.10 98 90 110 4.8 10
Sample 10: C11D8DD96-D07BMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: TECHNICON_11 0803A 08/03/11 16:22
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.26 mg/L 0.10 89 90 110 S
Sample 10: C11080096-007BMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TECHNICON_11 0803A 08/03/11 16:24
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.34 mg/L 0.10 93 90 110 3.5 10
Method: E353.2 Batch: R148952
Sample 10: MBLK-5 Method Blank Run: TECHNICON_11 0804A 08/04/11 15:07
Nitrogen, Nitrata+Nitrite as N ND mg/L 0.06
Sample 10: LCS-6 Laboratory Control Sample Run: TECHNICON_11 0804A 08/04/11 15:09
Nitrogen, Nitrata+Nitrite as N 2.59 mg/L 0.10 104 90 110
Sample 10: LFB-7 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: TECHNICON_11 0804A 08/04/11 15:12
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.91 mg/l 0.10 97 90 110
Sample 10: C11080096-012BMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: TECHNICON_11 0804A 08/04/11 15 :42
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 3.09 mg/L 0.10 101 90 110
Sample 10: C11080D96-012BMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TECHNICON_11 0804A 08/04/11 15:44
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 3.09 mg/L 0.10 101 90 110 0.0 10
Sample 10: C11080096-023BMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: TECHNICON_11 0804A 08/04/11 16:19
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.05 mg/L 0.10 98 90 110
Sample 10: C11080096-023BMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TECHNICON_11 0804A 08/04/11 16:22
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.08 mg/L 0.10 99 90 110 1.5 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Page 13 of 17
EN:RGY
~ 1"1.1 JOHAI OHI~ :....
www.energylab.com
AaIytIaI bCfllta,. stnce 1m Helena, lIT 877-472-0711 • Billings, lIT 8DD-735-4489 • Caspar, WY 888-235-0515
Gillatta, WY 8&&-186-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-172-1225 • Collage Station, TX 818-690-2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
111~lllillllllllllllllllll~~ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~IIIII
C11080096
Login completed by: Edith McPike
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 8/9/2011
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
ContainerfTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
5.2"C On Ice
Yes 0
Yes 0
Date Received: 8/2/2011
Received by: kg
Carrier Fed Ex
name:
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
No VOA vials submitted 0
Not Applicable 0
Page 14 of 17
b (Q
.......
~
r
IgHf(9Y Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record Page~of~ "'thihZ'ii11'naW . PLEASE PRINT (Provide as much Informatjon as possible.)
Company Name: Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. Sample Origin EPNState Compliance:
Oe.n/50fl A't:I\e.S ~,..u\ Q",w-Te.(" .N :'h·cd-~ ;2...011 State: LAI Yes 0 No 0
Report Mail Address: p Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print) o ~O)( ~D'1
13 lo-"tr1q \Ai f5Y~jJ R~"'I\ f ..... lmer 1..135 b7! J.;2.;( I --r;..nne,.. }.)eIL'J(.{f
Invoice Address: "-J Invoice Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
~/AM( ~v.W1C
SpeCial ReporUFormats: $: &mJ&r1 W@D@ ~@)(!!J~~[ID .. Contact ELI prior to , S;~~d ;: _ r'
o ... RUSH sample submittal rca _hL MII')SS
i!!O ",,5 ~ for charges and Cooler 10(5): ~ III ~ 01.& 0 ~ R scheduling -See I .-> 0 >. (\) W f-' I r, D DW DEDD/EDT(ElectronicOata) E1Cf.)~Zl::l: T'"-::r: :;; Instruction Page C .;t:-A lJ\
O °3::'0 (I) OJ U c: C t Rece.plTemp POTW IWWTP Format: ~ « Cf.)1·Q ~ m ::J U ommen s: o State' D LEVEL IV ~ <p2~1.§ ~ ~ ~ 1-5=.=')....===:o;c~....j . 1:0..(1)00 " ~ c: ~. o Other: D NELAC E~I~ , 4:: 5 On lee: (i)N
::JQ)._a>$: +t f-5 ' z a. «I aro W "E Custody Seal /.?\ ~ >1 ~ W ~ On Bot1le .l... 'ILJ Cf.) -to (/) 1? On Cooler W N
I-----------r----' -,----. -+----1 S c7i H Intact ® N
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection MATRIX 0 Signature r.0.
(Name, Location, Interval, etc.) Date Time Match \!.J N ,
-r-vJf\l -~ R 7/~/)j Ob40 .l W 'j. ~
2:IyJ/J -111\ 1/~7/11 \2.09 ::l. 'vJ "f ~
3-r-WN -I 'R 7/~tlll 070S :l W 'f. :1--__ _
4 "TvJI\J _ 9, 7/~/ II 07;).3 ::;t. VJ I /< ~
5 TVJ N-l~ 7/~bllI DUY :2. \oJ 'f ~
6 'TvJN-S 7/;J.b/ll 09~' ~\rJ Ir ~
7 TwN -\ 'i7/:J..b/ll lO;2S :2. W " ~
8 TVJN -14 7/:;'b/lll\lQ 2W 1-I ~
9"""IWtJ -12 I l/~/II ':lIb ;;.."W ~ ~t4iot?~
'°'TWN -\ 0 1/:J..7/1j Ob;2.5 2vJ 1-P! Custody Relinquished by, !pnntJ; 1 OBtelTime; SIg'l"'I're~". / Recelved by (print): OalI!rrome'; Signalvre;
---(v-f'tl\er Hol l,aCAl{ t:,/1/a.Oll 11 10 ... 'n"MrL ~~'-~ Record Relinquished by (print): '""-01 Oale1Time; Signalure; v Rel:e1ved by (Pont) OateITlI11e: Signature!
MUST be • r---------------------------+~K'Ke~.v~va~lo~IY~L'a~~r~~·w~,~~,-----~u.a~.~~lme~:---o.----------~~~lr~~a/u~~e-~~-----------
Signed SampleDlsDosal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal: Jrb9-. (.,:~-f. -g,.:J,.,1 l":'OS r.;.r) ~
In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc, may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested,
This serves as notice of this possibility, All sub-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report
Visit our web site at www.energylab.com for additional information, downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links,
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record Page~of~ "~ff{fby
_WAtCrlr/IAW
Company Name:
Oet)i.son M:f\~
Report Mail Address: pO f)C)( 8 o~
f.:>l""A')(j<\ \)\T 1$YSl)
Invoice Addi~ S (AM<:-
Special Report/Formats:
DDW o EDD/EDT(Electronic Data) o POTWIWWTP Format:. ___ _ o State: ___ _ o Other: ----
o LEVEL IV o NELAC
PLEASE PRINT (Provide as much informCJ!i9n~s possible.)
Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. I Sample Origin
::r c\ Qv.b.r+~r N ;+1""0..1-(.. ;2.0 II State: lAT
EPA/State Compliance:
Yes g No 0
Contact Name: Phone/Fax:
i~~"'~ ?"I mcr Y3S" 78 ;2.;2.,.1j
Invoice Contact & Phone:
~""tYl c...
3: &l}!]&!1 )1@Q@ OOrn®QD~'[j'~ o ... ~o ",l? ~CD;gOllii
.~>~ >-ro
cU) III rn 3: o$:=~ C) r ~<t~I.Q·s o ... CDI~ ~
10.. Q)~ C '~ lI{ a.ro.Q a 'E~lro' IJ
::l (J,).!:: Q) 3: zo..<tlg>o ~
~ >1
C/) u
~
Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
.-r;:1Iflt.r H/)}(,'J~
Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order: v ..
o ~! R w f-' :r: :;-
() c
<t: e I U I-ro
I-E <t: ::J
W ~ I 5 w iii (/) -g ca
Contact ELI prior to
RUSH sample submittal
for charges and
scheduling -See
Instruction Page
Comments:
-Sh'ppocflly:
Fdf.<&yy5S
1(001" ID(s):
C).·'lA J () I
Roeoipt Temp
.5. ;) 0 C
On I~e: (VN
Custody Seal ".-....
On Bottle Y 'fIJ
On Cooler t!iJ N
~----------------------_r--------._------_+------~I ~ en I H Intact G:> N
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
_ (Name, Location,Jnterval, etc.)
Collection
Date
Q Signature r..;... N
Match I.,!.)
I ?.w I ~ I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I~
__ . I ;).w 1 xl i i i 1 1 I I 1 I I 1_ l~
7TWN -14 17/.?.<illl I \OY~ I ~w Ix l I I 1 1 I I I I I I ~
8TWN -19 h/~I'I 11011 I ;;..w I ~I I I 1 I I II I L I ~ _ ~~
9 ,WfJ -17 h/.4q)1/ 1105\ l ;J.vJ 1"1-1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1~/1
1°TwN -4 17/;7.Q/II 1 1037 1 ~vJ I ~ I I I I I I I I , I ! W71fg~ Custody Receivedbytprint} DalefTlinG:------Signature:
ReeD rd R8ce1vEKI by (prln) Oate!T e: Signature:
MUSTbe~ ______________________________ ~~~~~ __ ~~~ ______ ~~ ______ ~ S. ed <:<:elV y ra ry: • me: '9"" Ufe: Ig n Sample Disposal: Return to Client Lab pjsposal: Ie, ~~ {,./f ~ ~ , ~ , ! / 9; ~ t;~
/ v
In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub·contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report.
Visit our web site at www.energylab.com for additional information, downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record Page 3...-of --.3.... tU-#l\r,y
'Em·Zlltl!Rlll' PLEASE PRINT (Provide as much information as possible.)
Company Name: Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. Sample Origin EPA/State Compfiance:
De-AlSo", M~tl've--> :seA a uc...,..tu-AI~+~·h~_ ;lOl \ State: VI Yes ~ No 0
Report Mail Address: 6'i;z.. 5 5. I+~k.wc..y Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler; (Please Print)
I ti I 131~~~) VI tli5H lZ..y~"'--p~\w".er y 3~ ~ 67 g -;2.;2;2. \ T().",,,,-~,-\-tc> II". ttt..1
Invoice Address: Invoice Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
5AVV'\L .s~c-
Special Report/Formats: ~&[b '\1'~D@ [rJ@:@)(!!J~~[Q) .. Contact ELI prior to ~hlpped Dy:
5: Fa}/x k~n-,.5 0 CD RUSH sample submittal
~O(l)£ i=' for charges and Cooter lOis): 7
~al;gOI Cii 0 ~ R scheduling -See
I d .. t'~f-(I) ._> a >oCij W t:. Instruction Page DDW o EDD/EDT(Electronic Data) ~(J)~ lJ! ~ 05:'8 gJ c> I -0 RacelptTemp D POTWflNWTP Format: () e Comments: u 00:::: =s U '+-<C ""liil:i2 <l: 0 ~. ? °c D State: o LEVEL IV o ~ c ~
Jo... Q)~ C"i:: l-I-III o Other: o NELAC
~ o.ro 00 l-e (!)N E~I1ij , -<l: 5 On Ice:
::::J~~,Cil5: ~ ~ 5 zo. ~o W -0 Custody Seal &>~. '-§ >1 0 W ttl On Botlle
(/) "0 (J) e On Cooier
~ ~ H Intact ~N
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection MATRIX j Signature ~N (Name. Location, Interval, etc.) Date Time Match
1
-rWN-3 7/;..0./ II I t:l~O ;2.\.00 Y. ~
2
T w I\J-~ 7/~g/11 ;2.W X ~ 14;27
3 7/;2.bJ II ;;..vJ I')C' ~ TvJtJ -b5 Og~Li ~ 4 '7/:;"Q/JI 1015 X T w N -70 ;2.W
5 TVJ tJ ~ C:D g/)/ II 0345 ')..vJ 'f. ~
6 P',e.7 _ 1 7 /;1..;//1 05l.35 2W 'I ~
7 p; ~'L -;2, 11/:;..5/11 CgO~ J.:W " ~
8 P~t'".2-3 lJ~f:.J/JI QiYS :2W X ~ 0)
9 \XWLP 7/~//1 Of>;2.S ;),,·W t 00) ~
lCl-rr II-tU\jj.1~ L It:::::!
Custbdy Rellnquluhdd by (p'lnt~ DmelTime: ~~:M1u L/>-'\
Received by (prinl): OalelTime: Slgnatvre:
-c."Mf u"ld.wl fc./1I~\\ 1/30 Record Rilllnqulshe<l by (prlnl~ t OateJTime· Signature' ....J Recetll'ld by (print); O~tcIT~oo: Si9""lure.
MUST be
Signed ReGe vI!<! ~y Lab_"'" ory: LJ3tCf In"" k;.?f b.-Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal: ,:; r."> h C'-Jff: -9 ././ / f, 05
In certain circumstances. samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to ~ther certified laboratories in order to complete the analysi~eQuested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report.
Visit our web site at wwwcenergYI.~Q,.gQ.m for additional information, downloadable fee schedule, forms. and links.
TabH
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-l Field Data QNQC Evaluation
Volume
Location 2x Casing Volume Pumped Volume Check Conductivity RPD pH RPD Temp RPD
Piezometer 1 --2183.0 NC 7.86 NC 18.09 NC
Piezometer 2 --575.2 NC 8.61 NC 16.78 NC
Piezometer 3 -2866.0 NC 12.14 NC 17.73 NC
TWN-l 40.47 80.94 100.00 OK 783.1 782.0 0.14 7.37 7.39 0.27 15.13 15.14 0.07
TWN-2 51.22 102.44 71.00 Pumped Dry 2611.0 NC 6.54 NC 16.31 NC
TWN-3 41.79 83.58 47.00 Pumped Dry 2455.0 NC 6.83 NC 16.15 NC
TWN-4 56.62 113.24 130.00 OK 1001.0 1000.0 0.10 7.19 7.20 0.14 14.79 14.79 0.00
TWN-5 52.39 104.78 120.00 OK 3002.0 3003.0 0.03 6.78 7.02 3.48 14.74 14.85 0.74
TWN-6 36.18 72.36 88.00 OK 1492.0 1493.0 0.07 6.86 6.86 0.00 15.03 15.00 0.20
TWN-7 10.53 21.06 12.00 Pumped Dry 1219.0 NC 7.29 NC 15.93 NC
TWN-8 54.77 109.54 130.00 OK 2346.0 2349.0 0.13 7.28 7.27 0.14 14.86 14.85 0.07
TWN-9 21.81 43.62 30.00 Pumped Dry 2608.0 NC 6.61 NC 16.23 NC
TWN-10 15.6 31.20 45.00 OK 3595.0 3621.0 0.72 4.33 4.34 0.23 15.86 15.78 0.51
TWN-11 47.33 94.66 110.00 OK 2704.0 2705.0 0.04 6.74 6.76 0.30 15.12 15.10 0.13
TWN-12 51.06 102.12 120.00 OK 2430.0 2430.0 0.00 7.02 7.04 0.28 14.83 14.83 0.00
TWN-13 48.06 96.12 11 0.00 OK 1188.0 1190.0 0.17 7.81 7.81 0.00 15.15 15.14 0.07
TWN-14 47.1 94.20 50.00 Pumped Dry 1034.0 NC 7.58 NC 16.00 NC
TWN-15 41.04 82.08 55.00 Pumped Dry 1461.0 NC 6.82 NC 15.33 NC
TWN-16 33.95 67.90 77.00 OK 1818.0 1807.0 0.61 6.81 6.83 0.29 15.03 15.00 0.20
TWN-17 49.37 98.74 67.00 Pumped Dry 1120.0 NC 7.30 NC 15.15 NC
TWN-18 56.89 113.78 132.00 OK 2123.0 2128.0 0.24 6.96 6.97 0.14 14.54 14.54 0.00
TWN-19 37.3 74.60 88.00 OK 1917.0 1907.0 0.52 7.27 7.27 0.00 15.59 15.53 0.39
UWLP --250.1 NC 8.52 NC 20~87 NC
Piezometers 1, 2, and 3 were not pumped, only one set of parameters were taken.
TWN-2, TWN-3, TWN-7, TWN-9, TWN-14, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were purged to dryness before 2 casing volumes were removed. TWN-lO was purged to dryness after 2 casing volumes
were removed.
UWLP is a pond grab sample, no pumping was required and stabilization parameters are not applicable
RPD > than 10%
Uedox Potential RPD Turbidity RPD
382 NC 4.1 NC
385 NC 5.9 NC
374 NC 14.4 NC
292 288 1.38 12.9 13.1 1.54
386 NC 12.3 NC
576 NC 52.1 NC
321 320 0.31 60.1 59.1 1.68
398 389 2.29 3.0 3.1 3.28
448 438 2.26 12.0 12.4 3.28
456 NC 102.9 NC
104 108 3.77 0.0 0.0 NC
374 NC 27.6 NC
500 462 7.90 53.1 58.1 8.99
396 386 2.56 8.3 8.1 2.44
185 185 0.00 60.1 59.1 1.68
252 247 2.00 11.8 11.8 0.00
401 NC 54.2 NC
362 NC 112.1 NC
403 394 2.26 0.0 0.0 NC
437 NC 30.9 NC
414 407 1.71 21.1 21.4 1.41
420 391 7.15 16.9 16.8 0.59
361 NC 0.0 NC
The QAP slates tbat turbidity hould be les than 5 Nephelometric Turbidity Uhirs ( 'NTH") prior to sampling unless the well is oharacterized by water that has a higher turbidity. The QAP does not require that turbidity measurements be-Ie s than 5 NTU prior to
sam~lin . As such the noted observations re arding turbidil): measurements less than 5 NTU below are included for infonnation purposes only.
H-2: Holding Time Evaluation
Holding
Quarter I Lab Analysis Time
Location Constituent Sampling Result Sample Collection Date Data Boldin Time Check
Piezometer 1 Chloride 53 mg/L 7/25/11 8/8/11 14.00 days OK
Piezometer 1 Nitrogen 7 mglL 7/25/11 8/4111 10.00 days OK
Piezometer 2 Chloride 9 mg/L 7/25/11 8/8111 14.00 days OK
Piezometer 2 Nitrogen 0.1 mglL 7/25111 8/4/1 I 10.00 days OK
Piezometer 3 Chloride 61 mglL 7/25/11 8/8/11 14.00 days OK
Piezometer 3 Nitrogen 1.8 mg/L 7/25/11 8/4111 10.00 days OK
TWN-I Chloride 14 mglL 7/26/11 8/8111 13.00 days OK
TWN-I Nitrogen 0.5 mg/L 7/26/11 8/3/11 8.00 days OK
TWN-2 Chloride 74 mglL 7/28/11 8/8/11 11.00 days OK
TWN-2 Nitrogen 33 mglL 7/28111 8/4/11 7.00 days OK
TWN-3 Chloride 134 mg/L 7/29/11 8/8111 10.00 days OK
TWN-3 Nitrogen 25 mglL 7/29/11 8/4111 6.00 days OK
TWN-4 Chloride 35 mglL 7/26/11 8/8111 13.00 days OK
TWN-4 Nitrogen 1.1 mg/L 7/26111 8/4/11 9.00 days OK
TWN-5 Chloride 44 mglL 7/26111 8/8/11 13.00 days OK
TWN-5 Nitrogen OJ mg/L 7/26/11 8/3/11 8.00 days OK
TWN-6 Chloride 17 mg/L 7/27111 8/8/11 12.00 days OK
TWN-6 Nitrogen 1.1 mglL 7/27/11 8/4/11 8.00 days OK
TWN-7 Chloride 5 mg/L 7/29111 8/8111 10.00 days OK
TWN-7 Nitrogen 0.7 mg/L 7/29/11 8/4/11 6.00 days OK
TWN-8 Chloride 18 mglL 7/26111 8/8/11 13.00 days OK
TWN-8 Nitrogen o mg/L 7/26/11 8/3/11 8.00 days OK
TWN-9 Chloride 208 mg/L 7/29111 8/8/1 I 10.00 days OK
TWN-9 Nitrogen 11 mglL 7/29/11 8/4/11 6.00 days OK
TWN-I0 Chloride 28 mg/L 7/27111 8/8/11 12.00 days OK
TWN-IO Nitrogen 0.1 mglL 7/27111 8/4111 8.00 days OK
TWN-Il Chloride 76 mglL 7/27111 8/8/11 12.00 days OK
TWN-ll Nitrogen 0.1 mgIL 7/27111 8/4111 8.00 days OK
TWN-12 Chloride 102 mglL 7/26111 8/8111 13.00 days OK
TWN-12 Nitrogen 0.6 mg/L 7/26111 8/4111 9.00 days OK
TWN-13 Chloride 49 mg/L 7/26/11 8/8/11 13.00 days OK
TWN-13 Nitr~gen 0.1 mglL 7/26/11 8/3111 8.00 days OK
TWN-14 Chloride 25 mg/L 7/29111 8/8111 10.00 days OK
TWN-14 Nitrogen 3.5 mglL 7/291l1 8/4/11 6.00 days OK
TWN-15 Chloride 47 mg/L 7/28111 8/8/11 11.00 days OK
TWN-15 Nitrogen 1.6 mg/L 7/28/11 8/4/11 7.00 days OK
TWN-16 Chloride 31 mglL 7/27111 8/8111 12.00 days OK
TWN-16 Nitrogen 2.4 mg/L 7/27/11 8/4111 8.00 days OK
TWN-17 Chloride 74 mglL 7/29111 8/81l ] 10.00 days OK
TWN-17 Nitrogen 8.5 mg/L 7/29111 8/4111 6.00 days OK
TWN-18 Chloride 65 mg/L 7/28111 8/8/11 11.00 days OK
TWN-18 Nitrogen 1.8 mglL 7/28/11 8/4/11 7.00 days OK
TWN-19 Chloride 113 mg/L 7/28/11 8/8/11 11.00 days OK
TWN-19 Nitrogen 7.1 mg/L 7/28/11 8/4111 7.00 days OK
TWN-65 Chloride 49 mglL 7/26/11 8/8/11 13.00 days OK
TWN-65 Nitrogen 0.1 mg/L 7/26/11 8/4/11 9.00 days OK
UWLP Chloride o mglL 7/25/11 8/8/11 14.00 days OK
UWLP Nitrogen o mg/L 7/25/11 8/4/11 10.00 days OK
TWN-70 Chloride 5 mgIL 7/29/11 8/8/11 10.00 days OK
TWN-70 Nitrogen 0.7 mgIL 7/29/11 8/4/11 6.00 days OK
H-3: Analytical Method Check
Parameter Method Method Used by Lab
Nitrate £353.2 E3 53.2
Chloride A4500-CIB A4500-CIB
Both Nitrate and Chloride were analyzed with the correct analytical method.
H-4: Reporting Limit Evaluation
Lab Reporting Rqd' Reporting
Lo~ation Constituent Sampling Result Limit Limit Qualifier
Piezometer 1 Chloride 53 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mgIL 1 mg/L
Piezometer 1 Nitrogen 7 mg/L 0.5 mglL 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L D
Piezometer 2 Chloride 9 mg/L 1 mg/L Im~ 1 mg/L
Piezometer 2 Nitrogen 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L
Piezometer 3 Chloride 61 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
Piezometer 3 Nitrogen 1.8 mglL 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mglL 0.1 mg/L
TWN-l Chloride 14 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mgIL
TWN-l Nitrogen 0.5 mg/L 0.1 mglL 0.1 mglL 0.1 mg/L
TWN-2 Chloride 74 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
TWN-2 Nitrogen 33 mg/L 2 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L D
TWN-3 Chloride 134 mg/L 1 mglL 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
TWN-3 Nitrogen 25 mg/L 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L D
TWN-4 Chloride 35 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mgIL 1 mgIL
TWN-4 Nitrogen 1.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mglL 0.1 mg/L
TWN-5 Chloride 44 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
TWN-5 Nitrogen 0.3 mglL 0.1 mglL 0.1 mglL 0.1 mglL
TWN-6 Chloride 17 mgt'L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
TWN-6 Nitrogen 1.1 mg/L O.l mglL 0.1 mglL 0.1 mglL
TWN-7 Chloride 5 mglL 1 mglL 1 mglL 1 mglL
TWN-7 Nitrogen 0.7 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L
TWN-8 Chloride 18 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
TWN-8 Nitrogen o mglL O.l mglL 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L U
TWN-9 Chloride 208 mg/L 1 mg/L I mg/L 1 mgIL
TWN-9 Nitrogen 11 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L D
TWN-lO Chloride 28 mg/L 1 mglL 1 mglL 1 mgIL
TWN-I0 Nitrogen 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L
TWN-ll Chloride 76 mglL 1 mg/L 1 mglL 1 mg/L
TWN-l1 Nitrogen 0.1 mgIL 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mglI,-0.1 mg/L
TWN-12 Chloride 102 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
TWN-12 Nitrogen 0.6 mg/L 0.1 mglL 0.1 mglL 0.1 mg/L
TWN-13 Chloride 49m~ 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
TWN-13 Nitrogen 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L
TWN-14 Chloride 25 mg/L I mglL I mgIL 1 mglL
TWN-14 Nitrogen 3.5 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L
TWN-15 Chloride 47 mg/L 1 mglL 1 mglL 1 mg/L
TWN-15 Nitrogen 1.6 mglL 0.1 mgIL O.l mglL 0.1 mg/L
TWN-16 Chloride 31 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
TWN-16 Nitrogen 2.4 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mglL 0.1 mglL
TWN-17 Chloride 74 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
TWN-17 Nitrogen 8.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.1 mglL 0.1 mglL D
TWN-18 Chloride 65 mglL 1 mglL 1 mg/L 1 m~L
TWN-18 Nitrogen 1.8 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L
TWN-19 Chloride 113 mglL 1 mglL 1 mglL 1 mglL
TWN-19 Nitrogen 7.1 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L D
TWN-65 Chloride 49 mg/L 1 mglL 1 mglL 1 mg/L
TWN-65 Nitrogen 0.1 mglL 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mglL 0.1 m~L
UWLP Chloride o mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L 1 mg/L U
UWLP Nitrogen o mglL 0.1 mglL 0.1 mglL 0.1 mglL U
TWN-70 Chloride 5 mglL 1 mglL 1 mg/L 1 mg/L
TWN-70 Nitrogen 0.7 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L
U = Analyte was not detected at the RL
D = RL was increased due to sample matrix or required dilution due to the sample concentration. In all cases the analytical
results were greater than the reporting limit used.
H-5 QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Coostituent TWN-7 TWN-70 %RPD
Chloride 5 5 0.00
Nitrogen 0.7 0.7 0.00
Constituent TWN-l3 TWN-65 ;zr;. •• ,
Chloride 49 49 0.00
Nitrogen 0.1 0.1 0.00
H-6 QC Cantrol Limits for Analysis and Blanks
MS%REC MSD %REC
89 93
H 7R . TEl -ecelpt emperature va lJatlOn
Sample Batch Wells in Batch Temperature
CII040896 Piezometer I ,Piezometer 2, Piezometer 3, TWN-I,TWN-2, 2.2 ·c
TWN-3,TWN-4,TWN-S,TWN-6,TWN-7,TWN-7R,TWN-
8,TWN-8R, tWN-9,TWN-IO, TWN-ll,TWN-llR,TWN-
12,TWN-13, TWN-14,TWN-IS,TWN-I6, TWN-17, TWN-18,
TWN-19, TWN-60,TWN-6S,TWN-70,UWLP
H-8 Rinsate Evaluation
4) Previous
1) Rinsate Sample 2) Parameter 3) Rinsate Result Well Sample
TWN-7R Nitrogen ND mg/L TWN-15
'rWN·8R Nitrogen ND mg/L Piez-1
TWN-1lR Nitrogen ND mg/L TWN-10
The RlQsate sample Identified m Column 1 was collected after the pump was
used to purge the well identified as ''Previous Well Sampled" in Column 4
D = Reporting limit raised due to dilution/sample matrix.
7) Rinsate
5) Result for WeLl 6) Qualifier Reporting Limit
1.6 mg/L 0.1 mg/L
7 mg/L D 0.1 mg/L
0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/l
Tab!
Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
'l
MW-01
eNS
~l
MW-18
eNS
~1.6 TWN-15
00.1 TWN-10
" "'
00.1 TWN-11
~3.5 TWN-14
/ .11 1
/TWN-r ~1.1
TWN-6
~D
TWN-8
I /
P~-1/ '~7'
MW-19 e NS
~2.4
00.6
TWN-12
~ ~
[J
f' 00.7
TWN-7
~1 .8
TWN-18
PIEZ-2 0.1
p r(
\1
II #
~ £...;:::-~ = :;:::::.-
!If
# " II
"
I ~II
i,
II
II
II
-:? -7
II
11 32 ,I
II
II
II
II
I' II
II
II
II
• MW-21
N
\
II
II
\\
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
MW-02 eNS
MW-B5
~
<>-~D
MW-36 CELL NO. 48
MW-03
e NS
MW-20 e NS
~ ~ ~-----":::::::-----~,
CELL NO.1
MW-17
eNS
33
~1 .1 -4
PIEZ-3
"1.8
I .""" ..... ,
.5 TW4~7.5 ...... " 20 ... ,
-26 TW4-9OIt\ Clt~2
.8 0 1.9 Q§J'4-3 . \ TW4-10 lV)/ I
_-'..... I
1TWt16 (TWt11 ':~4-n 01. [J7. ~ Jl'4-2 B!t.2
'4-?~-~4
-32 TWtl 'r..: 8 iw4-8
eND ~1
TW~.6 6f.t14
NO ~4-6
o TW4-.26 TW4-23 ffn, \~ ... _J
PIEZ-4 .l-~====-
"NS Y
PIEZ-5
"NS
~ y
T37S
T38S
y
" -9'===--4 1/ ~,4 --~~~~~--v ---=--=-7/ '-"--::::.--_-=--=---1/
MW-22
eNS
~
'"
o 3000
II
#
#
#
MW-4
.4.9
TW4·1
06.8
PIEZ·l
r;l 7
TWN·l
~ 0.5
MW·35
-<:r NO
MW·36
~ 0.2
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATION
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mglL
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mglL
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
perched monitoring well installed
August/September, 2010 showing
concentration in mg/L
perched monitoring well installed April,
2011 showing concentration in mg/L
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19 and TW4-20 are pumping wells
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2011 NITRATE (mg/L)
(NITRATE + NITRITE AS N)
WHITE MESA SITE
SJS
REFERENCE H:/7180001
nov11 /nitrate/nit0911 .srf
APPROVED I DATE FIGURE
1-1
» >
7
MW-4
.41
TW4-1
036
PIEZ-l
" 53
TWN-l
~ 14
MW-35
-<>-59
MW-36
~54
o
;{
II I'
II
II I ~II
11
II
II
II
II
-?--:::::-
I' 32 II
II
II
jl
)' II
II
\1
II
)1
• M'1-21
\
\1
N
\\
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
MW-02 eNS
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
MW-B5
<>-rs
MW-36 CELL NO. 48
3$4
MW~
-Qdry--MW-~-37M" h
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
fj
~ J:<-M)I!-
NS 55 el.'1"---JVIVY~
MW-03 eNS
MW-20 eNS
MW-17 eNS
MW-Ol
eNS
~
MW-18 eNS
~5
~47 TWN-15
~76 TWN-ll
~25 TWN-14
~28 TWN-l0 ~208
~17 ~1WN-9
TWN-6
~18 TWN-8
PIEZ-l 1053
MW-19 eNS
~ TWN-18
TWN-7
33
~35
-4
PIEZ-2 os
PIEZ-3
"61
~4-12
1TW34-16 TW4-11 TW.4-13 06~ 04S ~-2 060
-32 TWtl 036 ~4-8
e33 TW4-1
TW4-4040 ~4-14
TW4-6 41 039
TWt23 TW:is6
~~ ~~====-IO NS ~
PIEZ-5 <INS
~ ~ ~
T37S
T388
~31
~ ~
[J
~
~
"
~ ~ ~ ~-----'~----­'::::,
~ ~_== __ 4 # ,~_4 --~~~~-II ~ ---~~~ ~\?
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATION
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mglL
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring well
showing concentration in mglL
perched monitoring well installed
August/September, 2010 showing
concentration in mg/L
perched Il)onitoring well installed April,
2011 showing concentration in mgll
3000
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
MW-22 eNS
II
//'
#'
#'
#'
#'
//
//
//
//
//
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19 and TW4-20 are pumping wells
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2011 CHLORIDE (mg/L)
WHITE MESA SITE
f.PPROVED I Df.TE
SJS
FIGURE REFERENCE H :/718000/
nov11/chloride/cl0911.srf 1-2
TabJ
Analyte Concentrations Over Time
TWN-l
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mgjl)
2/6/2009 0.7 19
1/21/2009 0.4. 17
9/21/2009 0.4 19
10/28/2009 0.5 18
3/17/2010 0.5 17
5/26/2010 0.6 20
9/27/2010 0.6 19
12/7/2010 0.6 14
1/26/2011 0.5 17
4/20/2011 0.5 19
7/26/2011 0.5 14
TWN-2
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/t)
2/6/2009 25.4 29
7/21/2009 25 25
9/21/2009 22.6 17
11/2/2009 20.8 55
3/24/2010 62.1 85
6/2/2010 69 97
9/29/2010 69 104
12/9/2010 48 93
2/1/2011 43 93
4/28/2011 40 85
7/28/2011 33 74
TWN-3
Date Nitrate (mg/l) Chloride (mgfl)
2/6/2009 23.6 96
7/21/2009 25.3 96
9/21/2009 27.1 99
11/2/2009 29 106
3/25/2010 25.3 111
6/3/2010 26 118
7/15/2010 27 106
12/10/2010 24 117
2/1/2011 24 138
4/28/2011 26 128
7/29/2011 25 134
TWN-4
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/6/2009 1 13
7/21/2009 0.05 12
9/21/2009 0.4 13
10/28/2009 0.4 11
3/16/2010 0.9 22
5/27/2010 1.0 22
9/27/2010 0.9 19
12/8/2010 1 21
1/25/2011 0.9 21
4/20/2011 0.9 21
7/26/2011 1.1 35
TWN-5
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 0.22 42
9/21/2009 0.5 45
11/10/2009 0.2 48
3/16/2010 0.3 43
5/26/2010 0.3 44
7/12/2010 0.3 43
12/7/2010 0.3 45
1/25/2011 0.4 47
4/20/2011 0.3 44
7/26/2011 0.3 44
TWN-6
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 3.2 32
9/22/2009 1.6 13
11/3/2009 1.4 21
3/23/2010 1.5 19
6/1/2010 1.4 22
7/13/2010 1.4 73
12/8/2010 1.2 21
1/26/2011 1.1 18
4/20/2011 1.5 22
7/27/2011 1.1 17
TWN-7
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 ND 11
9/21/2009 ND 7
11/10/2009 0.1 7
3/17/2010 0.8 6
5/28/2010 1.2 6
7/14/2010 1.6 7
12/10/2010 1 4
1/27/2011 1.3 6
4/21/2011 1.7 6
7/29/2011 0.7 5
TWN~8
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I) Notes
8/25/2009 0 11 Nitrate is ND
9/21/2009 0 12 Nitrate is ND
11/10/2009 0 12 Nitrate is ND
3/16/2010 0 11 Nitrate is ND
5/26/2010 0 11 Nitrate is ND
7/12/2010 0 11 Nitrate is ND
1216/2010 0 9 Nitrate is ND
1/25/2011 0 13 Nitrate is ND
4/18/2011 0 10 Nitrate is ND
7/26/2011 0 18 Nitrate is ND
TWN-9
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 9.3 169
9/22/2009 8.9 201
11/10/2009 12 205
3/23/2010 7.6 183
6/1/2010 7.6 175
7/15/2010 10.7 210
12/9/2010 8 172
2/1/2011 9.5 217
4/28/2011 10 192
7/29/2011 11 208
TWN-l0
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 1.1 19
9/22/2009 1.6 35
11/10/2009 1.4 26
3/23/2010 1.5 54
6/4/2010 1 30
7/14/2010 0.2 21
12/8/2010 1.3 28
1/27/2011 0.3 40
4/21/2011 1.2 28
7/27/2011 0.1 28
TWN-11
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/3/2009 1.3 74
3/17/2010 1.4 73
6/4/2010 1.3 72
9/27/2010 1.4 76
12/8/2010 1.4 72
1/27/2011 1.4 84
4/26/2011 1.4 76
7/27/2011 0.1 76
TWN-12
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/3/2009 0.5 109
3/17/2010 0.7 113
5/26/2010 0.8 106
7/12/2010 0.7 112
12/7/2010 0.7 103
1/26/2011 4.2 87
4/26/2011 1 109
7/26/2011 0.6 102
TWN-13
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I) Notes
11/4/2009 0.5 83
3/17/2010 0 47 Nitrate ND
5/26/2010 0.1 49
9/27/2010 0.2 53
12/7/2010 0.4 57
1/25/2011 1.6 103
4/26/2011 0 49 Nitrate ND
7/26/2011 0.1 49
TWN-14
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/4/2009 3.4 32
3/24/2010 2.9 24
6/2/2010 2.9 30
7/15/2010 3.5 26
12/10/2010 4.2 28
1/28/2011 3.7 24
4/27/2011 3.5 30
7/29/2011 3.5 25
TWN-15
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/10/2009 1.1 78
3/18/2010 0.7 43
5/28/2010 1.0 39
7/13/2010 1.0 36
12/9/2010 1.2 38
1/27/2011 1.4 43
4/27/2011 1.6 49
7/28/2011 1.6 47
TWN-16
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/4/2009 1 39
3/17/2010 1.2 35
5/27/2010 0.2 35
9/27/2010 2.6 35
12/9/2010 2 30
1/27/2011 4.6 34
4/27/2011 1.6 39
7/27/2011 2.4 31
TWN-17
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/4/2009 6.7 152
3/24/2010 10.4 78
6/3/2010 11 87
7/15/2010 8.9 66
12/10/2010 8 65
2/1/2011 8.6 90
4/28/2011 9 81
7/29/2011 8.5 74
TWN-18
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/2/2009 1.3 57
3/17/2010 1.6 42
6/1/2010 1.8 63
9/27/2010 1.8 64
12/9/2010 1.6 59
1/27/2011 1.4 61
4/26/2011 1.8 67
7/28/2011 1.8 65
TWN-19
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/2/2009 7.4 125
3/23/2010 7.2 118
6/1/2010 6.2 113
9/29/2010 7.2 113
12/9/2010 7 107
2/1/2011 7 114
4/28/2011 6.9 120
7/28/2011 7.1 113
Piezometer 1
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/!)
2/19/2009 6.8 NA
7/14/2009 6.8 60
9/22/2009 7.3 78
10/27/2009 7.4 61
6/2/2010 7.2 52
7/19/2010 6.8 52
12/10/2010 6.S 60
1/31/2011 7 60
4/25/2011 6.8 58
7/25/2011 7 53
Piezometer 2
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/19/2009 0.5 NA
7/14/2009 0.5 7
9/22/2009 0.5 17
10/27/2009 0.6 7
6/2/2010 0.6 8
7/19/2010 0.6 8
12/10/2010 0.2 6
.1/31/2011 0.3 9
4/25/2011 0.3 8
7/25/2011 0.1 9
Piezometer 3
Date Nitrate (mgJl) Chloride (mgJl)
2/19/2009 0.7 NA
7/14/2009 0.8 12
9/22/2009 0.8 24
10/27/2009 1.2 19
3/24/2010 1.7 116
6/2/2010 1.6 36
7/19/2010 1.6 35
12/10/2010 1.8 25
1/31/2011 1.8 40
4/25/2011 1.7 35
7/25/2011 1.8 61
Piezometer 4
Date
7/14/2009
Nitrate (mg/I)
1.8
Chloride (mg/I)
46
Piezometer 5
Date
7/14/2009
Nitrate (mg/I)
0.7
Chloride (mg/I)
18
MW-18
Date Nitrate (mg/I)
7/14/2009 ND
Chloride (mg/I)
51
MW-19
Date Nitrate (mg/I)
7/14/2009 2.2
Chloride (mg/I)
24
Upper Wildlife Pond
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I) Note
9/22/2009 0 5 Nitrate NO
10/27/2009 0 3 Nitrate ND
6/2/2010 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride NO
7/19/2010 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride-NO
12/10/2010 0 1 Nitrate NO
1/31/2011 0.1 1
4/25/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride NO
7/25/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride NO
Frog Pond
Date
10/14/09
Nitrate (mg/I)
o
Chloride (mg/I)
o
Notes
Nitrate ND
TabK
Concentration Trend Graphs
tn c 0 :g
1! -c CD u c 0
0
! ~ z
~ Z ~
.-----;-----~----~----~------._----._----_r----_.~~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa.::l
./
O~-I\ON
~~
o~-5n\l
.'" O~-AeV\l
o~-uer
~~ 60-lO0
60-lnr
60-JeV\l
r-----+-----~----_+----~~----+_----~----_+----_+go-oao
co o co o 10 o N o o
tn c 0
+i .s r::: CD 0 C 0 0
-8 'C
0 -.c 0
""' I
Z ~
.---------r---------r---------r--------,r---------r ~~-des
~ ~-unr
O~-AON
o~-6nv
o ~-AeVl!
o~-uer
-60-PO
-60-lnr
60-leVl!
r---------+---------~--------~---------+--------~-90-~ea
lO N o N o o . .....
en c::: 0 ~ f! -c:::
Q)
(,) c::: 0 (.)
S
f! :t= Z
N I
Z ~
r---,---,...----,-----r----,-----.------r----r ~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
-O~-AoN
o~-6nv
o ~-liell'J
o~-uer
60-PO
·60-lnr
60-Jell'J
r-----;------+------+-----_r----~------+_----_r----_+80-oaa
o CO o CO o 10 o C"') o N o
T"""
o
a N
~
v
a a
/
~
a '"
'..
a '"
0~-6n\l
o~-AeVl
60-100
iT
I
BQ<>aO
a
o
C"')
~
I
~
\
~ ~ ~
~ ~
v
I ,
,
~
1.0
N
o N o ..-o
~~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-I\ON
o~-6n~
o ~-AeLt'J
o~-uer
60-l0Q
60-lnr
60-J8Lt'J
90-oaO
tn C o +::l ~ C CI)
Co) c o (.)
CI)
'tJ .-.. o -.c
(J
r'l ~
o CO ..-
~
\
o o ..-
o CX)
(1,6w)
-
o
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-"ON
0~-6n\f
O~-Aew
o~-uer
60-PO
60-lnr
60-Jew
90-090
II) c: 0 .. cu &. -c: CD Co) c: 0 (.)
S l! -Z ,.
Z ~
~------~------~------~~------~--------------~~~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-"ON
-o~-6nv
o ~-AeV\l
o~-uer
60-PO
60-JeV\l
~------~-------+--------~------4--------+--------+90-0ao
N co a (0
c:i
(1/6w)
N a o
UJ r::: o +:i I! ... r::: CD CJ r::: o o
CD "C "i:
.2 .c o ,.
z ~
~" " "'~
o ('t') 10 N
~
~
~
\
/
"
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-J\ON
~ o ~-fin'v'
-O~-Ae~
~ '(
o~-uer
60-PO
~ 60-lnr
60-Je~
~
80-oao
10 o 10 o ..-..-
en c::
0 ~
f! -c:: G) u c::
0 0
S f! :: z
II) I Z ~
r-----.,-----r-----.------,----~----r ~ ~-das
-~ ~-unr
O~-I\ON
o~-6nv
O~-Aell'J
-o~-uer
60-tOO
1-----j-----f----~I___---_I_---__1_---__f_ 60-lnr
CD
c:::i
LO
o
.-o
c:::i
r-----.-----.-----,-----~----_r----_.----~----__r ~~-das
~ ~-unr
en O~-"oN
c: 0 ~ l! -c: CD to) c: o~-6n\f 0 (J
CD "C 'I: ..2 .c:
(J
1.1) o ~-AeVIJ I Z ~
o~-uer
60-l0Q
\-----!------j-----+----I----+-----/------+--__f_ 60-lnr
fI) c . o +l l! .. c CD u c: o o
.J ~ z
CD I Z ~
Ii)
(")
..
~
~
J
~
I~
-'
N ..-
Ii)
c::i
-
a
~ ~-das
~~-unr
~ ~-qa.:l
o ~-"oN
o~-6nV'
o ~-AeV\l
o~-uer
60-PO
tn C o +=l l! -c
CD c.> c o o
CD "C 'i:
.2 .c o
CD I
Z ~
o 00
/ V / M:!.
o ,..... o (0 o LO
/
...
!
I
~ ,
\ I
/
1
~
~
).
~
o N
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-I\ON
o ~ -f5nv
O~-Aell\l
o~-uer
60-lO0
o
rn r:
0 .. ca ... .. r: G)
(,) r: 0 0
S ca ... ~
Z
t--I Z ~
r---~-----r----'-----r----'-----.----~----~----r ~~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-I\ON
o ~-6n'v'
o ~-AeV\l
o~-uer
60-PO
I-----I---I-----l----+---+-----I---+----/---+ 60-lnr
00
a
co
ci
N
ci
a
,------...,-----r-------r------r------r----,-~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
tn O~-AON
c 0 :;::; ~
C
CD U c 0~-6n'c;f 0 0
CD "0 't;
..2 .c 0
~ o ~-"<'eV\l Z ~
o~-uer
60-100
1-----+------1-----!-------I------+----460-(nr
N a 00 a
en c o ~ l! -c
CD (.)
C
C) o
S l! ~ z
co I Z ~
0> ci
N Q)
0
c: 0 Z
n;
~ nl
lfj c: 0 ;p ~ +-' c: B C:' 0 ()
~ ~ +-' Z
0Ij> z s: I:-
co
ci co ci
I")
a a
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
a
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-AON
0~-6n\f
O~-AeV'J
o~-uer
60-100
en r:::: o +::i I! -r:::: Got CJ r:::: o o
Got 'C 'i: o
.J:! o
co I Z ~
o N
~" '"
.
CD
T"""
~ ~-das
'" ~ ~-unr
~
" ~
O~-I\ON
/ . o ~ -6n'v'
~ ~
o ~-Aell\l
o ~-uer
60-lO0
60-lnr
N o o ..--..--
(1,6w)
,..------r----.,------,----..,------,-----,------r ~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-I\ON
0 C
0 ;
C'IS ... -C ' m u c -0 ~-6nv 0 0
S l! -.-Z
en I Z o ~-AelJlJ ~.
-o~-uer
60-PO
I------I-----I----I-----I----l-----+----I-60-lnr
o o ..-
U) c
0 += .G c CD CJ c 0 ()
CD "C 'C .2 .c ()
0,
Z ~
~--------~------~~------~~------~----------r ~~-das
~~-unr
o ~-"ON
0~-6n\l
O~-Aelf\J
o~-uer
60-1:)0
I---------t-------t-----t------j-------+ 60-ln r
o I.()
N
o o N
o I.() .,.-
o o .,.-
o I.() o
rn c 0 .. f! -c CI)
(,) c 0 (J
CI) -f! :t: Z
0 -I Z ~
.---~-----r----'-----.---~-----.----~----~----r ~~-das
~ ~-unr
• 0 ~-/\oN
o~-6nv
O~-Aelfll
o~-uer
60-PO
f----/---t---+---\----+-----I----t---f----+ 60-lnr
00 a
(1/6W)
CD a N a o
UJ c :S l! .... c
CD U C 0 (.)
CD 'tl 1: ..9 .c
(.)
0 -I Z ~
~------~-------r-------,--------~------~------~~~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-i\ON
o~-6n\f
O~-Ae~
o~-uer
60-l0Q
~----I-----+-----+-----+----t-----+ 60-lnr
o (0 o to o N o
en c 0 :;; .l! -c G)
CJ c 0
0
S l! ~ Z
"f"" -I
Z ~
r-----~----._----_.----_.------._----._----_r----_." ~~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~ -qa.:J
O~-AON
-0~-6nV'
O~-Aell'J
o~-uer
60-100
1------/---+----+----1----+---+-----\----+ 60-lnr
co
d
(1,6w)
<D
d
N
d
a
In I: o :t:i l! -I: CI)
U I: o o
CI)
"C .~ o -.c o --I Z ~
<0 00
~ v ~~
N 00 a 00
~~
v~
~
<0 l'-
'/
~.
~~
-
a l'-
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-I\ON
o~-6nv
o ~-Jiell\l
o~-uer
60-lO0
60-lnr
til C o :t:i l! ... c
CD o c o o
S
l! ~ Z
N
~ I
Z ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
I.C)
N
N
~~
--
~
~
~
I.C)
a
a
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-"ON
0~-6n\f
o ~-JieV\J
o ~-uer
60-l00
60-lnr
rn c
0 ~ ... .... C CI)
CJ c 8
CI)
"0 't: 0 1:
0
N
~ I Z ~
r----.,--------r-------,----.,.-----,-----r ~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-AoN
o~-6nV'
O~-Aell\l
o~-uer
1-----+-----\-----1-----+-----+-----1-60-lnr
o N ......
o o o <0 a N o
rn c: 0 :t:i cu ... -c:
CI)
CJ c: 0 0
S cu ... :!::: Z
M
'01"" I Z 3: I-
r------,----r---.----,----r---r---,---~-_r ~ ~-das
~ ~ -unr
o ~-l\oN
o ~-6n'v'
o ~-AeV\l
o~-uer
60-PO
t------i;------t----t----+----!----t---+---t----+ 60-lnr
00 o co o o
UJ c 0 :Q
l! -c .CD U
C 0 0
CD ~ 0 :2 0
C'!) .....
I Z ~
~------~------~------~------~------~--------r ~~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-I\ON
o~-6n\f
O~-Aeli\l
o~-uer
60-l00
1-------1------+-------+--------/----------1-------+ 60-lnr
o N .,... o o .,...
o CO o N o
rn c o := J! -c CD u c o
(J
.e l! ~ Z
'lit -I
Z ~
~~
~~
\
'''' "'-
0 I
to
ci
-
-
-
o
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa.:l
O~-"ON
o~-6nv
O~-AeV\l
o~-uer
60-PO
60-lnr
en c 0 ;
l! .. c CI)
CJ C 0 0
CI)
'lJ 'i:
.2 .c
0
~
~ I Z ~
r------r------~----~------~----_,------,_----__r ~~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-AoN
o~-6n\f
O~-Aell'J
o~-uer
60-l0Q
1-----+----1----+------1------+----+-----+ 60-lnr
l.C)
(Y') a
(Y')
l.C)
N a N
l.C) a ..-
0 . C o .. " .... -c.
CD CJ
C o o
.e ~ z
It)
T"" I Z ~
•
•
~.
~ ~-d9S
~ ~-unr
O~-AON
-o ~-6nV'
~
'" ~ v -o~-uer
I
60-PO
60-lnr
o '"
/'
o '"
~
v V
/
o <D o '" (1/6w)
v
o M o N
.
o
~ t-des
t~-unr
0~-5n\l
o~-Ae~
Ot-uer
60-100
60-lnr
,.-----,----,,.-----,-----,---,-----,---,-----,---,.---,-~ ~ -des
~ ~-unr
O~-AON en &: 0 :Q
l! -&: CD CJ &: o~-6n\f 0 0
S l! ~ z
CD -o ~ -AeV\l I Z ~
o~-uer
!----4----j----I----I----lf----+--+----+--+-----I-60-lnr
I.C) C\I I.C) a
ci
rn c o :i:i
.G c CI) u c o o
CI)
"C 0':
.2 .c o
CD -I Z ~
o "<:t
v
~
~
LO C")
~
o C") LO N o N LO ...--o LO o ...--
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-AON
o ~-6n'v'
o ~-liell\l
o~-uer
60-100
~------~------~------~------~------~------~ ~~-das
~~-unr
~. O~-AON
0 :a ca .b c CD U c: o ~ -6nv 0 0
S I! :t= Z ..... -I O~-Aell'J Z ~
o~-uer
60-l00
I------+-------+-------t--------I---------l----------l-60-lnr
a
U) c 0 :;::
.G c
CI) u c 0
0
CI)
"C
'.i: 0
.c 0 ,... -I Z ~
.-----~----_r----_.----_.r_----~----._----_r----~~~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa.:l
O~-l\oN
-o~-6nV'
o~-~elN
o~-uer
60-PO
r---------+------t------j--------ir--------t-------i------i------+ 60-lnr
a <0 .....
a v ~
a o ~
o GO
(1/6W)
a <0 a N a
en c o :w l! -c (I)
(,) c o o .e l! :t:: Z
co
~ I Z ~
N
0
~
/
'\
•
\
co a <0 a N a
.
o
~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
O~-I\ON
o~-6nV'
o ~-AeVII
o~-uer
60-lO0
~ ~ -des
,
~ ~-unr
~
~
/
o~-6n\f
.....
""
/
60-PO
o o ..
(lJ6w)
.-----.-----.------.-----,------r-----,------.----~~~-das
~ ~-t,mr
en O~-AON
r:: 0 .. [! .... r::
CI)
(J r:: o~-6n\f 0 0
.$ ~ Z
en ... o ~-AeV\l I Z ~
-o~-uer
f----\---+----t----/----+---+---I----/-60-lnr
N <D
126
124
122
120
118
-...J en 116
S.
114
112
110
108
106
0> 0> 0 0 0 ..-I I I ...... C :::l 0 co --:I 0 --:I
TWN-19 Chloride Concentrations
0 0 0 ..-..-..-I I I >-Cl > co :::l 0
:2: « z
..-I .0 Ql u..
..-..-I C :::l
--:I
..-..-I 0-Ql
CI)
r---.----r---.----l----.----.---.----.---.----.----r ~~-das
~ ~-unr
-60-JeV\J
r_---r--~----~--~----+----+----~---r----r_--1_--_+Bo-~aa
co
«:i
o 0>
I ~ ~
~
o '"
f
o " (1/6w)
o M o N o
~ ~-das
~L -unr
OL-flON
o~-6nv
o~-uer
60-1'0
.. c o :;::I
S c " " c o o
~
Z
N
~ II
E ~ ii:
.-/ /
v :>
~ /
~
<0 .,; '" .,; v .,; M .,; N .,;
~ ~-d·S
o~-5n\l
o ~-uer
60-100
60-JeVIJ
Bo<)ao
o
VI C o :.c l! -c
CD u c o o
CD "C 'i:
..2 .c o
N ...
oS CD E o ~ Q:
co
~
..,.;::;;;;; ...............
co
~
............... r------.. ...............
N
~
a
~
~ ~-des
~ ~-unr
~
~~
O~-"ON
o ~-6n'v'
o ~-liell\l
o~-uer
~
......... 60-lnr
N a
tI) c: o ~ l! -c: CD (J c: o
()
S ~
Z
M
~ S CD E o N .!a
0..
N
~~
\
~
l
0
~
(
" ~ ~ ~~.
~
00
o
~
<0 c:i N c:i
~ ~-das
-
O~-i\ON
o ~-6n'v'
o~-uer
60-PO
-60-lnr
60-JeV\l
o
tn
C 0 +i C'G ... ... c CI) u c 0 0
CI)
" "i:
0
.c 0
(II) ...
S
CI)
E
0 N CI) c:
,.-----.----,-----r----.,-------r----r----.-~ ~-das
~ ~-unr
-~ ~-qa.::l
O~-"ON
o~-6nv
a ~-Aell\l
N-uer
-60-PO
I-----j.----I------j-----I-----\----I-----j-60-Jell\l
a N ""-
a a
""-
a to a N a
rn c o +:i I! .. c CI) o c o o .s ~ z
~
'-.s CI)
E o ~ 0:
0
N
(1/6W)
co ci N
c:i
60-lnr
-60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-l nr
a
UJ C 0 +:i CIS ... .. c
CD u c 0 0
CD "C ".:
.2 .c
0
~ ...
S CD E 0 N CD a::
•
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
1----+---I---l---+---+---I----j---+----1~-_+ 60-lnr
a LO LO ('t) a LO ('t) C'\I
(1I6w)
a C'\I LO ..-a a ..-
en I: o ~
l! ... I: CD (J
I: o o .s l! ;t::::: z
an ... .s CD
E o N CD
Q.
co
ci
~~
N
ci
60-l nr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
-60-lnr
o
en c 0 .. l! .... c
Q)
CJ c 0
0
Q)
~ 'C
.2 .c
0
1.1) ...
Q) ....
Q)
E 0 N Q)
0::
,---r--,-------,--,.----r--..,-------,----r----,.----r 60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-l nr
60-lnr
I---/---+---+---\---+--+----+---t---t---;-60-lnr
o N co ..-N ..-o co co N o ..-
C»
ci
co
ci CD ci
L()
a
(1/6w)
N ci
~~
a
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
U)
C 0
:t:I f! ..
'C CI)
U C 0 (.)
CI)
't:J 'i: 0 ::c
(.)
CO -~
,------r------r-------,------,----,------r 60-lnr
• 60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
I-------j-----t-----+----t------+-----+ 60-lnr
a (0 a It) a N a a ..-
r! 0 ~ c: .. u c: 0 0
~ Z
en
~ i
r--------.r--------,---------.---------r---------r 6~lnr
• 60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
eO-ln r
60-lnr
60-lnr
~-------+--------+-------_l--------+------___I_ 60-lnr
~ N
oj
~
ci o
(I) C 0, ---~.
t:
5 c.
0 (.)
G)
"Q .-,",'
.2 .c
(J
CD
~ ;:
:&
r----...-------,-----,-----,.-----r------.-60-lnr
•
60-lnr
60-l nr
6O-lnr
6O-lnr
I----+-----+-----+----t------t-----+ 60-lnr
o ('I)
l()
N o N 1.0 ..-o ..-
rn c o .. ~ c CD u c o o
S ~ Z
"D C o a..
CD ~ -:2 ~ ..
CD c.. c.. ::,)
~~ .-------
GO o o
~
~ ~
~
v o
o
N o o
.......
,
,
~
~
~ ~-das
~~-unr
~ ~ -qa.::l
O~-I\ON
o~-6nv
o~-uer
60-lnr
r-------.-------~------,,------_.------~------__r ~~-das
~ ~-unr
~ ~-qa.::l
en c::: 0
~ C'G ... ... c:::
CD O~-"oN CJ c::: 0 0
CD "C 'i:
0
.c:
0 o ~-6n'v'
"C c::: 0 c..
~
"C
~ o ~-AeV\l ... CD C. c. ::>
o~-uer
60-PO
I---------I--------j--------t--------t-------t-------+ 60-lnr
CD o
,--,-----,----,--,--,-----,----,--,--,-----,60-'ON
60-1'0
60-das
It)
C 0 "" l: c " " C 0 60-das U
S ~
Z
"D C
0 a.
." E! 60-6nlt lL
60-tnr
60-lnr
'" '" ... '" '" ... '" '" -0
'" '" 0 '" '" '" 0 0 '" (1 /6w)
..
" 0 .,
~ " " " C 0 0 ..
-C 'C .!!
.&:
0
-C C 0 0..
'" 0 ~
LL
r_--,----,----~--_r----r_--,_--_,----,_--~--~60-'ON
60-1'0
60-dOS
60-doS
60-6n\l
~--+----+----l----+----+---I---~-+---+---I-60-lnr
'" ci
.,
ci
<D
ci "' o
(116w)
v
ci '" ci
N
ci
o
o
TabL
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Friday, October 28,2011 12:14 PM
'[e-mail]'
Jo Ann Tischler; David Frydenlund; Harold Roberts; Lisa Grady
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2011 03 Nitrate Monitoring
C11080096.CSV
Attached to this e-mail are electronic copies of laboratory results for nitrate monitoring conducted at the White Mesa
Mill during the third quarter of 2011, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
Quality Assurance Manager
1