DRC-2013-001411 - 0901a06880352aa4

ENERGYFUELS
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www.energvfuels.com
February 25, 2013
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 4th Quarter 2012 Nitrate Monitoring Report
UDEQ Docket No. UGW-09-03 White Mesa Uranium MiD
Dear Mr. Lundberg: DRC-2013-001411
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the 4th Quarter of 2012
as required by the January 2009 Stipulated Consent Agreement, UDEQ Docket No. UGW-09-03, as well as two
CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truly, ^
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Jo Ann Tischler
Director, Compliance
CC: David C. Frydenlund
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Katherine A, Weinel
Central Files
February 25, 2013
Sent VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Mr. Rusty Lllndberg
Division of Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144850
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of 4th Quarter 2012 Nitrate Monitoring Report
UDEQ Docket No. UGW-09-03 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
3039742140
www.energyfuels.com
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Nitrate Monitoring Report for the 4th Quarter of 2012
as required by the January 2009 Stipulated Consent Agreement, UDEQ Docket No. UGW-09-03, as well as two
CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very trul~
e ELS RES~URCES (USA) INc.
JoAnn Tischler
Director, Compliance
cc: David C. Frydenlund
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Katherine A. Weinel
Central Files
,/
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Nitrate Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Stipulated Consent Agreement, January 2009
Docket No. UGW09-03
4th Quarter
(October through December)
2012
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Boulevard, Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228 ~
February.25, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 3
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING ................................................ 3
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ..................................... 3
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring ...................................................................................... 4
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed .................................................................................. 4
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring .................................................. 4
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures ....... 5
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater .................................. 5
2.3 Field Data ............................................................................................................ 6
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map .............................. 6
2.5 Laboratory Results .............................................................................................. 7
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results ........................................................................ 7
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................... 7
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION ................................... 7
3.1 Field QC Samples ............................................................................................... 8
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ..................................................................... 8
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ........................................................................... 8
3.4 Data Validation ................................................................................................... 8
3.4.1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation .................................................................... 9
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation .......................................................................... 10
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ...................................................... : ........ 10
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist .................................................................... 10
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation ...................................................................... 10
3.4.6 QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates ............................................... 11
3.4.7 Rinsate Check ........................................................................................... 11
3.4.8 Other Laboratory QAlQC ......................................................................... 11
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA ....................................................................... 12
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions ........... 12
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map ................................................... 12
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater
Contour Map for Previous Quarter ........................................................... 12
4.1.3 Hydrographs .............................................................................................. 13
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation ................. -13
4.2 Review of Analytical Results ............................................................................ 14
4.2.1 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps ............................... 14
4.2.2 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs .................... 14
4.2.3 Interpretation of Analytical Data .............................................................. 14
5.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ................................................................. 15
5.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions ..................................... 15
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ 15
7.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT .............................................. 15
8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ........................................................... 16
1
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
Table 2 Nitrate Percent Difference
Table 3 Chloride Percent Difference
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-l Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
H -2 Holding Time Evaluation
H -3 Anal ytical Method Check
H -4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-5 QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H-6 QC Control limits for Analysis and Blanks
H-7 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
H -8 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
2
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\20l2 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Utah Department of Environmental Quality ("UDEQ") Division of Radiation
Control ("DRC") noted in a Request dated September 30, 2008 (the "Request"), for a
Voluntary Plan and Schedule to Investigate and Remediate Nitrate Contamination at the
White Mesa Uranium Mill (the "Mill") (the "Plan"), that nitrate levels have exceeded the
State water quality standard of 10 mg/L in certain monitoring wells. As a result of the
Request, Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. ("EFRI") entered into a Stipulated Consent
Agreement (the "Consent Agreement") with the Utah Water Quality Board in January
2009 which directed the preparation of a Nitrate Contamination Investigation Report
("CIR") and Quarterly Nitrate Monitoring Reports. A subsequent letter dated December
1, 2009, among other things, recommended that EFRI also address elevated chloride
concentration in the Nitrate Monitoring Reports. The Consent Agreement ("CA") was
amended in August 20 11. Under the amended Consent Agreement, EFRI submitted a
Corrective Action Plan ("CAP"), pursuant to the requirements of the Utah Groundwater
Quality Protection Rules [UAC R317-6-6.15(C -E)] on November 29,2011 and revised
versions of the CAP on February 27, 2012 and May 7, 2012. On December 12, 2012,
DRC signed the Stipulation and Consent Order ("SCO"), Docket Number UGW12-04,
which approved the EFRI CAP, dated May 7, 2012. The SCO ordered EFRI to fully
implement all elements of the May 7, 2012 CAP.
This is the Quarterl y Nitrate Monitoring Report, as required under the Consent
Agreement, State of UDEQ Docket No. UGW-09-03 for the fourth quarter of 2012. This
report meets the requirements of Consent Agreement, State of UDEQ Docket No. UGW-
09-03 and is the document which covered nitrate monitoring activities during this
monitoring period.
Based on the schedule included in the CAP and as delineated and approved by the SCO,
all activities associated with the implementation of the CAP began in January, 2013.
Because none of the CAP requirements have been implemented in the 4th quarter 2012,
and as agreed to in telephone conversations with DRC on January 14, 2013, this 4th
quarter 2012 report is not required to include any of the additional reporting requirements
specified in the CAP or SCO. The additional reporting requirements specified in the
CAP and SCO will be included in the quarterly nitrate reports beginning with the report
for the 1st quarter of 2013 which will be submitted on or before June 1,2013.
2.0 GROUNDWATER NITRATE MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing
wells, temporary chloroform contaminant investigation wells and temporary nitrate
investigation wells is attached under Tab A. Nitrate samples and measurements taken
during this reporting period are discussed in the remainder of this section.
3
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
2.1.1 Nitrate Monitoring
Quarterly sampling for nitrate monitoring parameters was performed in the following
wells:
TWN-1 TWN-8 TWN-15 Piezometer 3
TWN-2 TWN-9 TWN-16
TWN-3 TWN-10 TWN-17
TWN-4 TWN-11 TWN-18
TWN-5 TWN-12 TWN-19
TWN-6 TWN-13 Piezometer 1
TWN-7 TWN-14 Piezometer 2
Table 1 provides an overview of all locations sampled during the current period, along
with the date samples were collected from each location, and the date(s) upon which
analytical data were received from the contract laboratory. Table 1 also identifies rinsate
samples collected, as well as sample numbers associated with any required duplicates.
As indicated in Table 1, nitrate monitoring was performed in all of the nitrate monitoring
wells, and Piezometers 1, 2, and 3. Analytical data for all of the nitrate wells, and the
piezometers, are included in Tab G.
Nitrate and chloride are also monitored in all of the Mill's groundwater monitoring wells
and chloroform investigation wells. Data from those wells for this quarter are
incorporated in certain maps and figures in this report but are discussed in their respective
programmatic reports.
2.1.2 Parameters Analyzed
Locations sampled during this reporting period were analyzed for the following
constituents:
• Inorganic Chloride
• Nitrate plus Nitrite as Nitrogen (referred to herein as nitrate)
Use of analytical methods consistent with the requirements found in Revision 7.2 of the
QAP was confirmed for all analytes, as discussed later in this report.
2.1.3 Groundwater Head and Level Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells and/or piezometers, pursuant
to Part 1.E.3 of the Groundwater Discharge Permit (the "GWDP") (dated August 24,
2012):
• The quarterly groundwater compliance monitoring wells.
4
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
• Existing well MW -4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation wells.
• Piezometers -P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-5.
• MW-20, MW-22, and MW-34.
• The DR piezometers which were installed during the Southwest Hydrogeologic
Investigation.
• Nitrate monitoring wells.
• In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in
conjunction with sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and
accelerated efforts, regardless of the sampling purpose.
All well levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded
within 5 calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the
summary sheet under Tab C.
2.2 Sampling Methodology and Equipment and Decontamination Procedures
The QAP, Revision 7.2, dated June 6, 2012 provides a detailed presentation of
procedures utilized for groundwater sampling activities under the GWDP (August 24,
2012).
The sampling methodology, equipment and decontamination procedures that were
performed for the nitrate contaminant investigation, as summarized below, are consistent
with the QAP.
2.2.1 Well Purging, Sampling and Depth to Groundwater
A list of the wells in order of increasing nitrate contamination is generated quarterly. The
order for purging is thus established. The list is included with the Field Data Worksheets
under Tab B. Mill personnel start purging with all of the non-detect wells and then move
to the more contaminated wells in order of nitrate contamination, starting with the wells
having the lowest nitrate contamination.
Before leaving the Mill office, the pump and hose are decontaminated using the cleaning
agents described in Attachment 2-2 of the QAP. Rinsate blanks are collected at a
frequency of one rinsate per 20 field samples.
Purging is completed to remove stagnant water from the casing and to assure that
representative samples of formation water are collected for analysis. There are three
purging strategies specified in Revision 7.2 of the QAP that are used to remove stagnant
water from the casing during groundwater sampling at the Mill. The three strategies are
as follows:
1. Purging three well casing volumes with a single measurement of field parameters
2. Purging two casing volumes with stable field parameters (within 10% RPD)
3. Purging a well to dryness and stability (within 10% RPD) of a limited list of field
parameters after recovery
5
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
Mill personnel proceed to the first well which is the well with the lowest concentration
(i.e. non-dectect) of nitrate based on the previous quarter's sampling results. Well depth
measurements are taken and the one casing volume is calculated. The purging strategy
that will be used for the well is determined at this time based on the depth to water
measurement and the previous production of the well. The Grundfos pump (a 6 to 10
gallon per minute [gpm] pump) is then lowered to the appropriate depth in the well and
purging is started. At the first well, the purge rate is measured for the purging event by
using a calibrated 5 gallon bucket. After the evacuation of the well has been completed,
the well is sampled when possible, and the pump is removed from the well and the
process is repeated at each well location moving from the least contaminated to most
contaminated well. If sample collection is not possible due to the well being purged dry,
a sample is collected after recovery using a disposable bailer and as described in
Attachment 2-3 of the QAP. Sample collection follows the procedures described in
Attachment 2-4 of the QAP, Revision 7.2 dated June 6, 2012.
After the samples have been collected for a particular well, the samples are placed into a
cooler that contains ice. The well is then recapped and Mill personnel proceed to the next
well. If a bailer has been used it is disposed of.
Decontamination of non-dedicated equipment, using the reagents in Attachment 2-2 of
the QAP, is performed between each sample location, and at the beginning of each
sampling day, in addition to the pre-event decontamination described above.
Piezometers
Samples are collected from Piezometers 1, 2 and 3, if possible. Samples are collected
from piezometers using a disposable bailer after one set of field measurements have been
collected. Due to the difficulty in obtaining samples from the piezometers, the purging
protocols set out in the QAP are not followed.
After samples are collected, the bailer is disposed of and samples are placed into a cooler
containing ice for sample preservation and transit to the Mill's contract analytical
laboratory, American West Analytical Laboratories ("AWAL").
2.3 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all Field Data Worksheets that were completed
during the quarter for the nitrate contaminant investigation monitoring wells, and
piezometers identified in Section 2.1.1 above, and Table 1.
2.4 Depth to Groundwater Data and Water Table Contour Map
Depth-to-groundwater measurements which were utilized for groundwater contours are
included on the Quarterly Depth to Water Sheet at Tab C of this Report along with the
kriged groundwater contour map for the current quarter generated from this data. All
well levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded within 5
calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the summary sheet
6
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
under Tab C. A copy of the kriged groundwater contour map generated from the
previous quarter's data is provided under Tab D.
2.5 Laboratory Results
2.5.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
All analytical results were provided by A W AL. Table 1 lists the dates when analytical
results were reported to the Quality Assurance ("QA") Manager for each well or other
sample.
Results from analysis of samples collected for this quarter's nitrate investigation are
provided under Tab G of this Report. Also included under Tab G are the results of
anal yses for duplicate samples and rinsate samples for this sampling effort, as identified
in Table 1. See the Groundwater Monitoring Report and Chloroform Monitoring Report
for this quarter for nitrate and chloroform analytical results for the groundwater
monitoring wells and chloroform investigation wells not listed in Table 1.
2.5.2 Regulatory Framework
As discussed in Section 1.0 above, the Request, Plan, and Consent Agreement each
triggered a series of actions on EFRI's part. Potential surficial sources of nitrate and
chloride have been described in the December 30, 2009 CIR and additional investigations
into potential sources were completed. Pursuant to the Consent Agreement, the most
recent version of the CAP was submitted to the Director of the Division of Radiation
Control (the "Director") on May 7, 2012. The CAP describes activities associated with
the nitrate in groundwater. The CAP was approved by the Director on December 12,
2012. This quarterly report documents the continued monitoring consistent with the
program described in the initial Nitrate Contamination Investigation Report submitted in
2009. The monitoring program and reporting requirements set forth in the 2009
Contamination Investigation report will remain in effect until implementation of the CAP
commences in January 2013. Pursuant to telephone conversations with DRC on January
14, 2013, the monitoring and reporting requirements specified in the CAP and SCO will
be included in the quarterly nitrate reports beginning with the report for the 1st quarter of
2013 which will be submitted on or before June 1, 2013.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION
The Mill QA Manager performed a QAlQC review to confirm compliance of the
monitoring program with requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA
includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures,
an analyte completeness review, and QC review of laboratory data methods and data.
Identification of field QC samples collected and analyzed is provided in Section 3.1.
Discussion of adherence to Mill sampling Standard Operating Procedures ("SOPs") is
provided in Section 3.2. Analytical completeness review results are provided in Section
3.3. The steps and tests applied to check field data QAlQC, holding times, receipt
7
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
.J
temperature and laboratory data QAlQC are discussed in Sections 3.4.1 through 3.4.7
below.
The analytical laboratory has provided summary reports of the analytical QAlQC
measurements necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental
Laboratory Accreditation Conference ("NELAC") certification and reporting protocol.
The Analytical Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports, including copies of the Mill's
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record forms for each set of Analytical
Results, follow the analytical results under Tab G. Results of review of the laboratory
QAlQC information are provided under Tab H and discussed in Section 3.4, below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the
anal ytical laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field
sampling program.
Field QC samples for the nitrate investigation program consist of one field duplicate
sample for each 20 samples, one DI Field Blank ("DIFB") and equipment rinsate
samples.
During the quarter, two duplicate samples were collected as indicated in Table 1. The
duplicates were sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same
parameters as the nitrate wells.
Two rinsate blank samples were collected as indicated on Table 1. Rinsate samples were
labeled with the name of the subsequently purged well with a terminal letter "R" added
(e.g. TWN-7R). The results of these analyses are included with the routine analyses under
TabG.
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the existing sampling SOPs, the QA
Manager observed that QAlQC requirements established in the QAP were being adhered
to and that the SOPs were implemented, except as noted below.
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for nitrate monitoring for the period were performed.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAP and GWDP (August 24,2012) identify the data validation steps and data QC
checks required for the nitrate monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements,
the QA Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QAlQC evaluation, a
holding time evaluation, an analytical method check, a reporting limit evaluation, a QC
8
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
evaluation of sample duplicates, a QC evaluation of control limits for analysis and
blanks, a receipt temperature evaluation, and a rinsate evaluation. Because no VOCs are
analyzed for the nitrate contamination investigation, no trip blanks are required in the
sampling program. Each evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check
tables indicating the results of each test are provided under Tab H.
3.4.1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their
adherence with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of
information: the Field Data Sheets and the Quarterly Depth to Water summary sheet.
Review of the Field Data Sheets addresses well purging volumes and stability of five
parameters: conductance, pH, temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Review of the
Depth to Water data confirms that all depth measiIrements used for development of
groundwater contour maps were conducted within a five-day period of each other. The
results of this quarter's review are provided under Tab H.
Based upon the review of the field data sheets, all wells conformed to the QAP purging
and field measurement requirements. A summary of the purging techniques employed
and field measurements taken is described below:
Purging Two Casing Volumes with Stable Field Parameters (within 10% RPD)
Wells TWN-Ol, TWN-04, TWN-OS, TWN-06, TWN-08, TWN-ll, TWN-12, TWN-13,
TWN-16, TWN-18, and TWN-19 were sampled after two casing volumes were removed.
Field parameters pH, specific conductivity, turbidity, water temperature, and redox
potential were measured during purging. All field parameters for this requirement were
stable within 10% RPD.
Purging a Well to Dryness and Stability of a Limited List of Field Parameters
Wells TWN-02, TWN-03, TWN-07, TWN-09, TWN-I0, TWN-14, TWN-1S, and TWN-
17 were purged to dryness before two casing volumes were evacuated. After well
recovery, one set of measurements for the field parameters of pH, specific conductivity,
and water temperature only were taken, the samples were collected, and another set of
measurements for pH, specific conductivity, and water temperature were taken.
Stabilization of pH, conductivity and temperature are required within 10% RPD under the
QAP, Revision 7.2. It is important to note that redox potential and turbidity were
measured as well during purging and sampling. These parameters were not within 10%
RPD; however, these parameters are not required to be measured or to be within 10%
RPD per the approved QAP, Revision 7.2. Data from measurement of these parameters
has been provided for information purposes only. "
During review of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel
consistently recorded depth to water to the nearest 0.01 foot.
All field parameters for all wells were within the QAP required limits, as indicated
below.
9
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP, Revision 7.2 requirements
resulted in the observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Attachment 2-3
specifically state that field parameters must be stabilized to within 10% over at least 2
consecutive measurements for wells purged to two casing volumes or to dryness. The
QAP Attachment 2-3 states that turbidity should be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling
unless the well is characterized by water that has a higher turbidity. The QAP
Attachment 2-3 does not require that turbidity measurements be less than 5 NTU prior to
sampling. As such the noted observations regarding turbidity measurements greater than
5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• Nineteen well measurements exceeded the QAP's 5 NTU turbidity goal as noted
in Tab H. All required turbidity RPD's met the QAP Requirement to stabilize
within 10% except in wells that were purged to dryness as noted above.
EFRI's letter to DRC of March 26, 2010 discusses further why turbidity does not appear
to be an appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to DRC's
subsequent correspondence dated June 1,2010 and June 24, 2010, EFRI has completed a
monitoring well redevelopment program. The redevelopment report was submitted to
DRC on September 30, 2011. DRC responded to the redevelopment report via letter on
November 15, 2012. Per the DRC letter dated November 15, 2012, the field data
generated this quarter are compliant with the turbidity requirements of the approved
QAP.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample
holding time checks are provided in Tab H. All samples were received and analyzed
within the required holding time.
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement
in QAP Table 1 that samples be received at 6°C or lower. Sample temperatures checks
are provided in Tab H. All samples were received within the required temperature limit.
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by the laboratory were checked against the required
methods enumerated in the QAP. Analytical method checks are provided in Tab H. All
methods were consistent with the requirements of the QAP.
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits reported by the laboratory were checked against
the reporting limits enumerated in the QAP. Reporting Limit Checks are provided in Tab
H. All analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting limits, with the
10
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
exception of nineteen samples and two duplicate samples that had increased reporting
limits due to matrix interference or required dilution due to the sample concentration.
However, in all of those cases the analytical results were greater than the reporting limit
used.
3.4.6 QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of
duplicate and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the
duplicate and original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured
results (described as activities in the QAP) are less than 5 times the required detection
limit. This standard is based on the EP A Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-01 as cited
in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for all duplicate pairs for all analytes regardless of
whether or not the reported concentrations are greater than 5 times the required detection
limits. However, data will be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater
than 5 times the required detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%. The additional
duplicate information is provided for information purposes.
All duplicate results were within a 20% RPD. Results of the RPD test are provided in Tab
H.
3.4.7 Rinsate Check
Rinsate checks are provided in Tab H. A comparison of the rinsate blank sample
concentration levels to the QAP requirements -that rinsate sample concentrations be one
order of magnitude lower than that of the actual well -indicated that all of the rinsate
blank analytes met this criterion.
3.4.8 Other Laboratory QAlQC
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QAlQC Manager check the
following items in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct
and complete, (2) analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate Analytical
Laboratory procedures are followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5)
QC samples are within established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7)
special sample preparation and analytical requirements have been met, and (8)
documentation is complete. In addition to other laboratory checks described above,
EFRI's QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items (5) and (6)) to confirm that
the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for spike duplicates are
within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative sufficiently explains
any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are provided in Tab H.
All lab QAlQC results met these specified acceptance limits except as noted below.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that a Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate
("MS/MSD") pair be analyzed with each analytical batch. The QAP does not specify
11
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
acceptance limits for the MSIMSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the MSIMSD
pair be prepared on EFRI samples only. Acceptance limits for MSIMSDs are set by the
laboratories. The review of the information provided by the laboratories in the data
packages verified that the QAP requirement to analyze an MSIMSD pair with each
analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not require it, the recoveries were
reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established acceptance limits. The QAP
does not require this level of review, and the results of this review are provided for
information only.
The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the
MSIMSDs recoveries and the associated RPDs for all quarterly nitrate samples are within
acceptable laboratory limits for all regulated compounds except as indicated in Tab H.
One MSIMSD recovery was below the laboratory established acceptance limits. The
recoveries do not affect the quality or usability of the data because the recoveries outside
of the acceptance limits are indicative of matrix interference. The QAP requirement to
analyze a MSIMSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such the data are
compliant with the QAP.
The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the LCS
recoveries were acceptable which indicate that the analytical system was operating
properly.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a
reagent blank. All analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a blank sample
made and carried through all analytical steps. For the Mill samples, a method blank is
prepared for all analytical methods. The information from the Laboratory QAlQC
Summary Reports indicates that the method blanks did not contain detections of any
target anal ytes above the RL.
4.0 INTERPRETATION OF DATA
4.1 Interpretation of Groundwater Levels, Gradients and Flow Directions.
4.1.1 Current Site Groundwater Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the current quarter (shown as
depth to groundwater in feet) is included under Tab C. The data from this tab has been
interpreted (kriged) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under the same
tab. The contour map is based on the current quarter's data for all wells.
4.1.2 Comparison of Current Groundwater Contour Map to Groundwater
Contour Map for Previous Quarter
The groundwater contour maps for the Mill site for the previous quarter, as submitted
with the Nitrate Monitoring Report for the previous quarter, are attached under Tab D.
12
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
A comparison of the water table contour maps for the current (fourth) quarter of 2012 to
the water table contour maps for the previous quarter (third quarter of 2012) indicates
similar patterns of drawdown related to pumping of MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19
and TW4-20. Water levels and water level contours for the site have not changed
significantly since the last quarter, except for a few locations. Pumping at TW4-4, which
began in the first quarter of 2010, has depressed the water table near TW4-4, but a well-
defined cone of depression is not yet evident, likely due to variable permeability
conditions near TW 4-4 and the persistently low water level at adjacent well TW 4-14.
Reported increases in water levels (decreases in drawdown) of approximately 6 feet and
of approximately 3 feet occurred in pumping wells MW-26 and TW4-20, respectively,
and a decrease in water level (increase in drawdown) of approximately 3 feet occurred in
pumping well TW 4-19. Changes in water levels at other pumping wells (MW -4 and
TW4-4) were less than 1 foot. Water level fluctuations at pumping wells MW-4, MW-26,
TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 typically occur in part because of fluctuations in pumping
conditions just prior to and at the time the measurements are taken.
The increases in water levels (decreases in draw down) at MW-26 and TW4-20 have
slightly decreased the apparent capture of these wells relative to other pumping wells and
the decrease in water level (increase in drawdown) at TW 4-19 has increased its apparent
capture relative to other pumping wells. Overall, the combined capture of MW -4, MW-
26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 has changed only slightly since the last quarter.
Decreases in water levels of approximately 4 feet, of approximately 3 feet, and of
approximately 6 feet occurred in non-pumping wells MW-20, MW-37, and TW4-12,
respectively. The reported water level at PIEZ-2, located between the northern wildlife
ponds, increased by nearly 7 feet, and water level increases of approximately 3 feet and
of approximately 2 feet occurred at wells TWN-2 and TWN-4. Water level changes at
other non-pumping wells were less than 2 feet. The water level change at PIEZ-2
suggests increased natural recharge in the vicinity of the northern wildlife ponds since
last quarter and represents a partial reversal in the general decrease in water level at
PIEZ-2 since the cessation of water delivery to the northern wildlife ponds.
4.1.3 Hydrographs
Attached under Tab E are hydro graphs showing groundwater elevation in each nitrate
contaminant investigation monitor well over time.
4.1.4 Depth to Groundwater Measured and Groundwater Elevation
Attached in Tab F are tables showing depth to groundwater measured and groundwater
elevation over time for each of the wells listed in Section 2.1.1 above.
13
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
4.2 Review of Analytical Results
4.2.1 Current Nitrate and Chloride Isoconcentration Maps
Included under Tab I of this Report are current nitrate and chloride iso-concentration
maps for the Mill site. Nitrate iso-contours start at 5 mg/L and chloride iso-contours start
at 100 mg/L because those values appear to separate the plumes from background. All
nitrate and chloride data used to develop these iso-concentration maps are from the
current quarter's sampling events.
4.2.2 Nitrate and Chloride Concentration Trend Data and Graphs
Attached under Tab J is a table summarizing values for nitrate and chloride for each well
over time. Some data (MW -18, MW -19 and the Frog Pond) were not sampled this period
but the historical data are included for information purposes.
Attached under Tab K are graphs showing nitrate and chloride concentration plots in each
monitor well over time.
4.2.3 Interpretation of Analytical Data
Generally, the shapes of the nitrate and chloride plumes appear to be stable and
unchanged for the last thirteen quarters. The nitrate and chloride plumes maintain their
general geographic association and it is still possible to separate the plumes into a
segment northeast of the wildlife ponds and a southwest segment at the mill site. The
current quarter's data continue to support the conclusion in the Nitrate Contamination
Investigation Report that the nitrate and chloride at the Mill site are co-extensive and
appear to originally come from the same source.
Nitrate and chloride concentrations in samples from the down gradient edge of the plumes
(in the vicinity of tailings impoundment monitoring wells MW-30 and MW-31) have
changed very little (current concentration within one standard deviation of the average of
the previous twelve quarters and within laboratory variation). Nitrate in MW-30 has
increased from near 14 mg/L in 2005 to near 17 in 2012, while chloride has remained
essentially flat. Nitrate in MW-31 has declined from near 25 mg/L in 2005 to near 21
mg/L in 2012, while chloride has increased from near 140 mg/L in 2005 to near 170
mg/L in 2012 (an increase of approximately 20%). Thus, the nitrate/chloride plume does
not appear to be migrating in the down gradient direction.
In general, nitrate concentrations in nitrate monitoring wells are similar to values from
last quarter or have declined (Table 2). An exception is the most recent nitrate
concentration reported from Piez-3 which showed a 53% increase from last quarter,
going from 1.8 mg/L to 2.75 mg/L. Chloride concentrations are within 6% of last quarter
or have declined.
Note that samples from chloroform monitoring wells TW4-26, TW4-27, and TW4-12
have measured nitrate concentrations that are higher than 10 mg/L. However, nitrate
14
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
concentrations in these wells are clearly separated from the nitrate/chloride plume at the
Mill site by many wells that are below 10 mg/L or are nondetect for nitrate, including but
not limited to, TW4-3, TW4-9, TW4-10, TW4-23, MW-32 and TW4-16. Thus, nitrate in
TW4-26, TW4-27, and TW4-12 appears to be isolated from the plume at the Mill site, in
the same way that the relatively small nitrate plumes at TWN-9 and TWN-17 are isolated
from the plume at the Mill site.
5.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
There are no corrective actions resulting from fourth quarter 2012 nitrate sampling event.
5.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions
There were no corrective actions in the third quarter 2012 nitrate sampling event.
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Generally, the shapes of the nitrate and chloride plumes appear to be stable and
unchanged for the last thirteen quarters. The nitrate and chloride plumes maintain their
general geographic association and it is still possible to separate the plumes into a
segment northeast of the wildlife ponds and a southwest segment at the mill site. The
current quarter's data continue to support the conclusion in the Nitrate Contamination
Investigation Report that the nitrate and chloride at the Mill site are co-extensive and
appear to originally come from the same source.
Nitrate and chloride concentrations in samples from the down gradient edge of the plumes
(in the vicinity of tailings impoundment monitoring wells MW -30 and MW -31) have
changed very little (current concentration within one standard deviation of the average of
the previous twelve quarters and within laboratory variation). Nitrate in MW -30 has
increased from near 14 mg/L in 2005 to near 17 in 2012, while chloride has remained
essentially flat. Nitrate in MW -31 has declined from near 25 mg/L in 2005 to near 21
mg/L in 2012, while chloride has increased from near 140 mg/L in 2005 to near 170
mg/L in 2012 (an increase of approximately 20%). Thus, the nitrate/chloride plume does
not appear to be migrating in the down gradient direction.
7.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFRI has provided to the Co-Executive Secretary an electronic copy of all laboratory
results for groundwater quality monitoring conducted under the nitrate contaminant
investigation during the Quarter, in Comma Separated Values ("CSV") format. A copy
of the transmittal e-mail is included under Tab L.
15
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. on February 25,
2013.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
By: I /J/ /.'2 /7 /J d __
/~'PC'7~
/
Harold R. Roberts
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
16
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted.
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my know ledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
~ J/1 /YI /J /)/1 # ~~
lIarold R. Roberts
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
17
N:\WMM\Required Reports\Nitrate Quarterly Monitoring Report\2012 Q4\2012 Q4 Nitrate Report text.docx
Tables
Table 1
Summary of Well Sampling and Constituents for the Period
..
I' ; I',.
Well ., . .~" . Sa.pple "Coll~ction pate
Piezometer 01 10/17/2012
Piezometer 02 10117/2012
Piezometer 03 10117/2012
TWN-01 10115/2012
TWN-02 10117/2012
TWN-03 10/17/2012
TWN-04 10/15/2012
TWN-05 10115/2012
TWN-06 10115/2012
TWN-07 10116/2012
TWN-08 10115/2012
TWN-08R 10115/2012
TWN-09 10117/2012
TWN-10 10116/2012
TWN-11 10116/2012
TWN-11R 10116/2012
TWN-12 10116/2012
TWN-13 10115/2012
TWN-14 10117/2012
TWN-15 10/17/2012
TWN-16 10/16/2012
TWN-17 10117/2012
TWN-18 10116/2012
TWN-19 10116/2012
TWN-60 10/17/2012
TWN-65 10/15/2012
TWN-70 10/17/2012
Note: All wells were sampled for Nitrate and Chloride
TWN-60 is a DI Field Blank
TWN-65 is a duplicate of TWN-04, and TWN-70 is a duplicate ofTWN-15.
Date in paranthesis is the date of the revised report.
.,
D~te of L~b Report
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
10/30/2012 (1112/2012)
".
-,
'iii,,"";' I,' ;>;: I:: ' ,'lsr Q ;, ,2n<l .Q' ' j~dQ ,' "Location . '4thQ' '4thQ lst.Q
2009 . ',201:0 ' . 2010 ' ., 20;10,~ , 2.01,0 2011 I,' '~; -~ 'oil·' ,'., . '<!'i ' .. ,~i; .. { , , ,; .,
Piez 1 NA NA 7.2 6.8 6.5 7
Piez 2 NA NA 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.3
Piez 3 NA 1.7 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.8
TWN1 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5
TWN2 20.8 62.1 69 69 48 43
TWN3 29 25.3 26 27 24 24
TWN4 0.4 0.9 1 0.9 1.0 0.9
TWN5 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4
TWN6 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.1
TWN7 0.1 0.8 1.2 1.6 1.0 1.3
TWN8 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
TWN9 12 7.6 7.7 10.7 8 9.5
TWN10 1.4 1.5 1 0.2 1.3 0.3
TWN 11 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4
TWN12 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 4.2
TWN13 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.6
TWN14 3.4 2.9 2.9 3.5 4.2 3.7
TWN15 1.1 0.7 1 1 1.2 1.4
TWN16 1 1.2 1.3 2.6 2 4.6
TWN17 6.7 10.4 11 8.9 8 8.6
TWN18 1.3 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.4
TWN19 7.4 7.2 6.2 7.2 7 7
Red value indicates nondetect
Table 2
Nitrate (mg/L)
, ' 2nrl ,Q ,3rdQ
. 2011 2011 '
"4th Q ,~,
~ ,,2011 ~
':ii'" . ' "
6.8 7 6.6
0.3 0.1 0.1
1.7 1.8 1.7
0.5 0.5 0.5
40 33 33
26 25 25
0.9 1.1 0.9
0.3 0.3 0.3
1.5 1.1 1.4
1.7 0.7 2.2
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1
10 11 10.9
1.2 0.1 0.2
1.4 0.1 1.6
1 0.6 1.2
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1
3.5 3.5 3.9
1.6 1.6 1.3
1.6 2.4 2.6
9 8.5 8.1
1.8 1.8 1.9
6.9 7.1 6.5
lst 'Q
2012 ,
7.1
0.1
1.8
0.6
31
25
0.9
0.2
1.2
2.3
<0.1
12.2
0.8
1.6
0.9
<0.1
3.5
1.5
2.8
8.7
1.9
7
. ,,:" \ ,·C ·:. -a, :.y , > '
2nd'Q ' % DiffeFence 3rd ' 3rd·Q "~4th Q ;-:fi.
Q 20-12 and ,4th 'Q : 2012 ,.2012" . 2012,;
", 'J. '~', , 2012: ~. w
6.6 7.2 7.66 6
0.2 0.2 0.192 -4
1.7 1.8 2.75 53
0.6 0.6 0.432 -28
48.0 54.0 22.1 -59
24.0 27.0 12.1 -55
1.1 1.4 1.45 4
0.3 0.3 <0.1 -67
1.1 1.4 0.786 -44
1.2 0.9 0.641 -29
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0
10.6 12.3 12.5 2
0.9 0.6 0.119 -80
1.6 1.8 1.84 2
1.2 1.4 1.41 1
<0.1 0.1 <0.1 0
3.4 3.7 4.03 9
1.6 2.1 1.79 -15
2.0 2.4 2.50 4
9.1 9.5 9.65 2
2.1 2.3 1.95 -15
6.8 7.5 7.70 3
,,~i. i"1
I , 4th:::Q: Location 1sl ()" , '2ndQ '
I,' "" 2009 ' 2010 ". " 2010 ",. "\ -,I • '.1 ~; : ";,,, i<;' :'1'
Piez 1 NA NA 52
Piez 2 NA NA 8
Piez 3 NA 116 36
TWN1 18 17 20
TWN2 55 85 97
TWN3 106 111 118
TWN4 11 22 22
TWN5 48 43 44
TWN6 21 19 22
TWN7 7 6 6
TWN8 12 11 11
TWN9 205 183 175
TWN10 26 54 30
TWN 11 74 73 72
TWN 12 109 113 106
TWN13 83 47 49
TWN14 32 24 30
TWN 15 78 43 39
TWN 16 39 35 35
TWN17 152 78 87
TWN 18 57 42 63
TWN 19 125 118 113
Table 3
Chloride (mg/L)
...... "
I "''lst Qh:: , ,3rdQ '4thQ
2010 . ,2910 ,2011 '
i.' ,
52 60 60
8 6 9
35 25 40
19 14 17
104 93 93
106 117 138
19 21 21
43 45 47
73 21 18
7 4 6
11 9 13
210 172 217
21 28 40
76 72 84
112 103 87
53 57 103
26 28 24
36 38 43
35 30 34
66 65 90
64 59 61
113 107 114
2ndQ '
2011
58
8
35
19
85
128
21
44
22
6
10
192
28
76
109
49
30
49
39
81
67
120
. , ..... " . . '.
%' pi~fe .. elIce.··3rd '9' ; ~r~rQ' '4thQ lstQ , 2ndQ 3rdQ 4thQ, 20J2 and '4th Q 2011 2Q11 2012 2012 , 201,2 2012
", 20'1:2 " ,,-, .,.
53 55 78 58 56 55.0 -2
9 8 9 8 9 9.50 6
61 12 20 53 21 20.1 -4
14 10 15 17 17 17.5 3
74 76 86 103 93 79 -15
134 129 143 152 158 149 -6
35 20 20 24 25 26.4 6
44 45 45 39 48 43.5 -9
17 21 20 22 22 20.4 -7
5 6 5 6 6 5.67 -6
18 10 11 15 11 11.1 1
208 134 202 209 215 194 -10
28 33 44 28 33 30.8 -7
76 76 69 71 77 76.4 -1
102 87 104 106 102 101 -1
49 48 46 53 48 47.3 -1
25 27 26 27 27 27.4 1
47 38 38 46 50 47 -6
31 34 33 50 33 32.1 -3
74 71 79 80 85 84.8 0
65 60 64 64 67 67.5 1
113 108 114 117 117 118 1
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
Tab C Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Depth to Water Data
Tab D Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
Tab E Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab F Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Tab G Laboratory Analytical Reports
Tab H Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-l Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
H-2 Holding Time Evaluation
H-3 Receipt Temperature Check
H-4 Analytical Method Check
H-5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
H-6 QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
H -7 Rinsate Check
H-8 QC Control Limits for Analyses and Blanks
Tab I Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
Tab J Analyte Concentration Data Over Time
Tab K Concentration Trend Graphs
Tab L CSV Transmittal Letter
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
MW-5
• perched monitoring well
TW4-12 o temporary perched monitoring well
TWN-10
~ temporary perched nitrate monitoring well
PIEZ-1
(ii)
TW4-27
~
perched piezometer
temporary perched monitoring well
installed October, 2011
RUIN SPRING 6 seep or spring
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC. APPROVED
WHITE MESA SITE PLAN
SHOWING LOCATIONS OF PERCHED
WELLS AND PIEZOMETERS
DATE REFERENCE
H:/718000/may12/Uwelloc12.srf
FIGURE
A-1
TabB
Order of Sampling and Field Data Worksheets
~J
Name
TWN-B
TWN-13
TWN-5
TWN-1
TWN-10
TWN-7
TWN-4
TWN-6
TWN-12
TWN-11
TWN-15
TWN-1B
TWN-16
TWN-14
TWN-19
TWN-17
TWN-9
TWN-3
TWN-2
Piez 1
Piez 2
NItrate
Mg/L
Previous
Qrt.
NO
0.1
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.9
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.B
2.1
2.3
2.4
3.7
7.5
9.5
12.3
27,0
54.0
7.2
0.2
Piez 3 loB
wildlife NA
Nitrate Order
4th Quarter 2012
Nitrate Samples
Date/Purge sample Depth Total Depth
40/1S D,\O~ 145.5
JO/I5 o'1~ 120
ItJlt5 ,~ 150
ie/iS liSt) 112.5
iO/~b 003':> 105
i C/l,(, Ob''''(~ 105
\O/lS '11].. 125.7
"\u/1.5 \Si'1 130
ID/i~ 073::2.-110
lo/lb 082.::> 142
\cJi1 o,Oy 155
IO} j{, Oq'"\'l 145
ie/If> IOib 100
iC!,i1 Dill) 135
\o!i£ 1':2'?" \.f 110
10/ )'1 O/;l.S 110
\ C 1"1.7 01'')"-1 97
"
"0/ ~,,,,, O'7Y' 96
10/11 cn-ss 96
i(") i r7 DY:::>.)
10/11 OgOq
16/17 OK~J
-
('0 C9iD iO/n 11'1-
bS ) L\ 1..\2-\c/r511~
70 070i..j 10/ n 11'1,
Rinsate Samples
Name Date Sample
TWN-BR lullS DS'3,\'·\
/.
TWN-13R
TWN-5R
TWN-1R
TWN-10R
TWN-7R
TWN-4R
TWN-6R
TWN-12R ~
TWN-llR io/it; 0".& a/5£
~.
TWN-15R
TWN-1BR
TWN-16R
TWN-14R
TWN-19R
TWN-17R
TWN-9R
TWN-3R
TWN-2R
Samplers:
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r-------------------------------1 .~E~I)~~
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
I \...1""'" G ",o.r1'<:"-.N ,+rO\t~ ZO):L.
~ See instruction
Location (well name): IL-P_1G_"'Z._-_O_1 _________ ----l
Sampler Name
and initials: f!",tj,.,cr ... fJolh'a~11t
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging ,'0/17/ :20)2 and Sampling (if different) N / h ~-----------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [gJpump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IL-M_V,_:4 ______ ----l
Purging Method Used: [gJ2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q ", ... rt'erb .N ":,h-<>-h· Prev_ Well Sampled in Sampling Even~1 L-_'P_i_t;_L._-_-_()_2> _____ ----I
pH Buffer 7.0 j-D pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance 1L.--...;C1~'1 ... ~ ___ ---II ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O;Olft): o
Depth to Water Before Purging! b 1_/1 Casing yolume (V) 4" well:~_o ___ -II(_653h)
. , 3" Well:. () . (.367h)
Conductance (avg) L--...... :4;:..;1:....4.s..:f>""--_____ -' pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) ! 1 ~.l j Redox Potential (Eh)L...1 -!.1~(;'1-!..-_-I Turbidity! 1. 2..
Weather Cond~ I C ~._~_~_h_n4~~ __________ ~
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)L-! b_-__ ~
Time Gal. Purged o Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance ! :;...14 ~ pH I tq ,fb Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time Gal. Purged Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance pH Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ]
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged o gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 0 T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs .... 1 ....,Au.W.:;...;A~L _____ ----'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients ~ D 100ml D ~ H2SO4 'g)
Heavy Metals D' D 250 ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologics D D' 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ID D
Gh1of1 jc If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth IL--_() ____ ...... Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
Arri 'lJd 6n S;1-c d-' 0 €'A 7" -r-'N'ncr a. 1\ ot. ~"'i(,'n p('~.sent' -}() ("oHee..} Sa:WlpJ~.5.
blJ\~l-<:d 0..+ O&33~ \Nod-er ~lA.$ cJca.r. Lt:tt s.~G ",,-1 08-:bS
PIEZ-Ol 10-17-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
~
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
~ See instruction OENISON~~~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINI:S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 yT't\ Q\Aa.rt~r /J ,:h .. ;Je 2012
Location (well name): 1 '-..... ~....;lG;;;...'l.. ..... -_O.;;;..~ _________ ----I
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~",ner }Jon "J4~(r3t
Field Sample ID
D t d T· ~ P . I " c' t .,,f' /.-. . , a e an Ime lor urgmg IV} H::':l/ •• .,c.UI.d", 1 and Sampling (if different)
1 0/17/!2 0 1 ~
I #/,4
Well Purging Equip Used: [gJpump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) l "v/A
Purging Method Used: [gJ2 casings[gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I ..... Q~v.._O"_("~...;..G;:.:;r ..... l"""'i _________ ---' I -rvJtJ-OQ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '-_________ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0 I.D pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance ,-I _'t...;..~:...;.q ____ -,I ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): IL---v ____ --'
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 2..7. i>C> Casing Volume (V) 4" well:II--::0~ __ -II(.653h)
3" Well:. () . (.367h)
Conductance (avg) 713 pH of Water (avg) 7 .bO
Well Water Temp. (avg) Redox Potential (Eh)1 15<i Turbidity ..... 1 _'.3..;.,..7 __ ...J
Weather Condo .IL... __ S_"'"_,,_r1_., ___ S_'-l_tl _Ylj _____ ...J
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ..... 1 S_b __ -'
Time 1 OgOE Gal. Purged iJ Time 1 I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance ..... 1 ...:..~ ..... 13=--_---, pH 7,60 Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I ,";;;''' Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) L...-L.::).5:::..1.r...-_--' Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) 3,7 Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time Gal. Purged Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance pH Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1 0 T=2V/Q= 1 ~ 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1 0
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1-1 ;...;A_W_~....:..-L _____ ----I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients rn D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ D ILl
G h lor; clc If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth &...1 __ u ___ ----' Sample Time ogoq
See instruction
Comment
p.!(f':v~a on 5lt~ at 060~, ~l'JnG(" ~YI..l 6-~(f,'Y\ rr-es~nt +0 GolleJ .s~Mp)6.:5 ..
W 0..+-<:.(' Wa.-So b (1..\ \~~. .s 4\1Y) p l~.s c 6)}~d-G J... ",t 0 8'o<J . w Ov1cr vV~S M d,st{j c./ea r
Left oS j.}c; 0\+ 081'-1
PIEZ-0210-17-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 1-·-------··--··-·····-··-···---·-····1
IOEN,.so. Ni)JJ i
I MINES ..J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER D~scriptio~ ~f S~mpling Event: 1 '1 TF\ ())"'~( 1"-et ;V i+1'~1=-o ..:4<>12
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Location (well name): .... 1..:..~_i_-e._'l._"'_<13-=-_________ ---,
Sampler Name
and initials: I -(;..Yln~(' Hol}II~M/'1H
Field Sample ID P;~-z.-D3_ 10 17:2..0 l:t.
Date and Time for Purging 1 lO/lJ/;2.01'A. and Sampling (if different) AlIA '------------------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [gJpump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 .... ~_/_A ______ --I
Purging Method Used: [gJ2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q",,,,,..'fedi1 j'JHf4f< Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event l'---f_i_e_"Z._~_O __ 2. _____ ----I
pH Buffer 7.0 7 .. 0
Specific Conductance .... 1 _q_tt_9 ____ ...... 1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 L\' ~ L~
Conductance (avg) !2.qb~
'-----------~
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~_o __ ---II(.653h)
3" Well:. 0 . (.367h)
J2..4Zf
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 l:2.ql] Redox Potential (Eh) .... 1 _7_':> __ ~ TurbiditylL--IJ_, _'1_----1
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) .... 1 _b_b __ --'
Time 10820 1 Gal. Purged I 'i) 1 Time Gal. Purged
Conductance 1 2.~b9 1 pH 112.\O\Q 1 Conductance pH 1..-1 __ ---I
Temp.oC 11:2:.C1'1 I Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 75 1 Redox Potential Eh (m V)I '-____ -'
Turbidity (NTU) 1 H.q 1 Turbidity (NTU)
Time I I Gal. Purged 1 1 Time Gal. Purged
Conductance 1 1 pH I 1 Conductance pH L-I ___ --I
Temp.oC I 1 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) 11..--___ --'
Turbidity (NTU) 1 1 Turbidity (NTU)
White-Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 0 T = 2V/Q = I t> I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs .... 1 _A_YJ_A_L _____ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D m H2SO4 [1 D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
GrosS Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ D pg
Ch' oridc If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I'--__ D ___ ---' Sample Time .... 1 _0_8_:2._1 ___ --' 08~J
See instruction
Comment
ArT'nlccl on .5 ,'te • ()'\t o~ 1 c.. 'l1\t1)')l!r ~V\A (r~('r"f\ p(G.se~ ~ c.oJJeCf .$~M?J~.
~fV)flc.s 06\1 )d. 0-1-082.L \N~tt:(' wo..S lV10~~lj G\e<lf". L-e.~ .s ,'t-c ""t
PIEZ-0310-17-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
E~;F9E~111 FIELD DA~d=~~Ei~:O~~WATER
Descri~tion of Sampling Event: 1 L.p~~ Q\AtA.r1-er Ah1-r(A.+e, .2.0 1 ~
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 11-=r....L..;.W--:....;;N_-....;:O=.....;l _________ ----I
Sampler Name
and initials: l -rov')f)cr HoJJ;Ji4'1I!~
Field Sample ill 1 Tw}J -Ol~ IOlS201'J...
Date and Time for Purging 1 10/IS /20)7..-and Sampling (if different) N/ A L--~~ _______ ~
Well Purging Equip Used: @]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 G--r-u:r\&.f'o ~
Purging Method Used: @J2 casings [gJ3 casings
Swmpling Event I Q", ... rh ... ~ N j·h·",t< Prev. Well Sampled in Swmpling Event 1L---r_w_JJ_-_O_.5-'---____ ~
pH Buffer 7.0 7,0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Specific Conductance 1-1 _q;....'f_~ ____ ..... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 JJ;l,50
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 53.2.':> Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 3&. 7b 1(·653h)
3" Well:L-. _C> ___ ~.(.367h)
Conductance (avg) goo L--=-_______ ~ pH of Water (avg) 1-1 -L7..a...;3=4-'--_____ ~
Well Water Temp. (avg) l iS. () f::, Redox Potential (Eh)1 14) TurbiditYI-I _7:_~~_--,
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)L-1 .;..;.J~_b __ ..;...1
Time I-ll_J4_7 __ ~ . Gal. Purged 5D Time 1-1 J_J _~_g ---,-~ Gal. Purged bO
Conductance 80\ pH 1'·35 Conductance 1......,._8_o_8 __ ......
Temp.oC IS. ell Temp.oC 11S·0S
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ...;...1 ~....:-l __ ..;...I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1-1 ..:..;J):.....:y:....l.1 __ ~ Gal. Purged 70 Time u..11 :.-15_b __ --' Gal. Purged 1-1 _$_D __ ~
Conductance pH 1 ?J:5'f Conductance 1-1 ~_1_'1_1 __ · ...... 1 pHI 7.3~
Temp.oC )5.63 Temp.oC 115.05
Redox Potential Eh (mV) J'11 Redox Potential Eh (m V) ......,1 ...,;..F_1' __ ~
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) 12.]
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I 10
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 7'7~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1 0
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ..... IA_'W_A_'-______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml D 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 111 0 100ml 0 r:l H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) tGJ 0 Sample volume 0 19 0 ~
Gh lor;a( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1 70 .~~ Sample Time 1JSD
Comment
~ See instruction
Arr;\}~tl. on .$.,--tc oct ~ ) 139. -r o.Ylr'\er II\nA Go.(f"i., Pres.~rrt -ror ?",~e ~11~ ..sqlY"\p);~ -e.\l cn-d-·
Pu.r~e.. b~1\ ~-t-Jlll2", ?\Af't}~a. well -tor-~ +o}~l or' [{ Minv..tes. W~+~(" Wa.S cJeo<""
thl0V.~~Ov..t thG pv..-r~S=· P\A(~~ a::Y1tlc~ o.n4, SDtfV\plcS Go)J~c}eJ ~} 1150~
L-cff ~1+C, ~} 1l5Lj
TWN-01 10-15-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
l~E~f~;i)~~ FIELD DA~:a::l!~i~:O~~DWATER ~ See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: 1 l{Jh G~("1c:r Nli"r~1'<... 20)2..
Location (well name): ,-I~..:........;W~N.;;...-......;O;;;...;::l.=-________ ----J
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 ::((J\J"Jt1er JJl>JJ,'Jo.~ htl
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 \0/1'=-/..2.0J'2. and Sampling (if different) L..-I...]C-lo!~I-,-Z.:-%=-~--=-I'2.~ ____ --I
Well Purging Equip Used: [][]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 o;..\)nJ(:~S
Purging Method Used: IT[] 2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 Q ~r\ter G 1\J,'t~ A.1-<: Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I '-41_W_)J_-_O_.3 _____ ---I
pH Buffer 7.0 f .D pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance ..... 1 _4..:......:~-=-~ ___ ----'1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 1.(;. Db
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 Z~. bE:> Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 147.21..\ 1(·653h)
3" Well: D (.367h) 10--___ --'
Conductance (avg) ~21 0 '---=~~------~ pH of Water (avg) ~.~O '--__ ~~ ____ ----J
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 rs. 54 Redox Potential (Eh)1 12?-.. Turbidity &....;1 2.~Y __ --,
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) ..... 12..;;;.3_l>_----'
Time 1...-1 ~;......:.'1'1-,-&_----, Gal. Purged 1 57., SO Time 1 I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 1 ~~ \ b pH 1 6:~S Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC 1 '\5.57 Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ..:..;\Xl......;;.....;~_--I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 ~ 9 Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I075S Gal. Purged ..... 1 _0 ___ --' Time IO/st I Gal. Purged Ie> I
pH ..... 1 ,.~_:_l .. )_:;-----'
".l~
Conductance
Temp.oC
Conductance 1 :..:>1 rS I pH I b~O:g I
1 Pill~ I Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 _1Z1_'1 __ ---' Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1]9:3 I
Turbidity (NTU) I ". g Turbidity (NTU) I l:2..g I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
~e\-~('e.
V olume of Water Purged S7.S0 gallon(s}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ~.q4 I
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L-.I --L.I()~ __ --I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I J~ ~l
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1L....!.:IAL:..w.;;...:~;....L ______ --I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients lB 0 100 ml 0 r1I H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha D 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) TlI 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
Gh\~;~G If preservati ve is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1 ...... ~...:...3_~2._tt __ ----I Sample Time DIS'S
Comment
~ See instruction
Af"rl\lc.A l)n ~\1-~ tA:,-t lYLi(). r-J"'r1Y\-e1' dlf\~ G-f/\.rr\~ Fe>~n}..rot"" pu.r~~. P""r~c:. b-e~G{n ert 14 Y3.
r ...... ~e6. w<!.)\ +0'" ~ +0-\-",1 o.f :5 mitw.-t~ ",,,01. 45 S",co~j.~, Pv.t"~J. well ol,.~ ~
vv(k .. h:r \N~ mo~ C\6tM'?w"~G <h~e'tl d\t 1'-14g. Left, sd~ ~r-1'-1.51
Arri~e1 on SJl~ At 0751. T«'r\t\ef o.Yl~ G-lA.rr:" f>1"~~eJ\t +0 Gollec.t-.s.~fl.'\fl~~. D~-th +0 \,A.)o.1-er Wa..5
23.'16, ;'~t"G'~ bO\;lcA o.'¢ O/b~ Le# ~l1-G 0\+ 0758
TWN-0210-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1L-'1_W_W_-_D_3 _________ -.I
Sampler Name
and initials: I =r~tm~Y"" Ho)l,J~7--rJ.J
Field Sample ID l'"1'w/U-03.., \0 '72.0}'<-
Date and Time for Purging 1101 J '/::1..017... and Sampling (if different) 1 Dlr112t> 1'2
Well Purging Equip Used: @Jpump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I G=(\Af\J\:fos
Purging Method Used: 002 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q"'-lArkt"b N;·:h·~tc: Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I L.. _1\_W_N_-_O_9 _____ .....I
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance IL.o--Q_Q_1 ____ ..... 1 !lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1~l1_b_.D_O __ ----I
Depth to Water Before Purging I '33. qs Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 YD. S 1 1(.653h)
3" Well: C) (.367h) '-----_.....I
Conductance (avg) L--?.~4.:..::1=7..L-_____ ~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I )\1. 'l 0 Redox Potential (Eh)1 l.5S TurbiditYL-1 ..Ll'l...:.-.._---I
Weather cond'l L-_~_\A_l'\_n_~ __________ --'
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior s'ampling event)L-1 Xl_b __ .....1
Time
Conductance I ?-t...\ ?-..l
Temp.oC
Gal. Purged 1L-4--..;;;..S __ -.....I
pH 1,·1'
Redox Potential Eh (mV) \65 L--___ ~
Turbidity (NTU) I 1~
Time I D7'-\J Gal. Purged IL--0 ___ ---I
Conductance ~501 pH 1/.IY
Temp.oC I \'5/CSC:>
Redox Potential Eh (mV) \'\ , L--___ ~
Turbidity (NTU) 7, 0
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I l>75 b I Gal. Purged I b I
Conductance I ~'1~O I pH 1,·15 I
Temp.oC 1 13.~' I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 137 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 8.:3 I
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (CAP)
be~Ofe. Voiume of Water Purged 1I....-l{S=-____ ....... gallon(s) A-+tCr
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1...-1 .....;.'_D ___ --I T=2V/Q= 1 g,lo 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 }.1I
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs .... , A_W_h_L ______ .......
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 D 3x40 ml 0 D HCL D D
Nutrients rJ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 !9 D
Heavy Metals D 0 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha 0 D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) . .ro D Sample volume D ~ D )9
c. h lorjJt:. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1-.' <q...,;..Lj-L.-0 0_1 __ ---1 Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
A .~; -.)",a, on s ;+e /itt 1'-1 I 0 ~"nc.r ~hJ. &..tr;" pl"eSef\ +-+br fU'je. f' W'~G b:j""" 01.3-1 '-I1;z,
p u.r ~ e-a Well -for (!.. hi-oJ . 0 +' 'i l"I:lllA.t~ t""'~ 3 () S ~ co ntl. $. 'P \,lr~d We 1/ J(~
\to(j..t:e( \J01Ah MO$l1~ Clet>-f'. 'Pu..r~r' eYlJ.el ... t 1'1 lob. Le..n-S:1-'" ..... + IYIg ~
Arf;"e~ OV\ &;·h:.a\-t-0,'13. -r~I"\Y\e(" <1\Y"lA (j-~("r'n pre~en+ to (..o1'ed-SC\lV1ple-s, \)ep1-l, To 'W().teT "WGl0
~Y. SD S~fVlpl~ bd\;lc~ "'+ O,L)7. LGf.r s;.f<. ,j-(:)7 Sa
TWN-03 10-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r-O--O----------------------------.. ---~----1 J OE~~9~~~~
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
I '-)Tn Qv..o.<+~(' j0~+ro-.te.. 2,012,.
~ See instruction
Location (well name): .... 1-r_W_N_ ... _D_y __________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1-rN1n~r Hol I, ~~..j1tH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 10/lS/201"2.. and Sampling (if different) ..... I I'/._:a_~ ________ ----I
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 .... &;;.-r_\N1_"'...:~:....D_S ____ ....I
Purging Method Used: [!!]2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q", ... A-.,b /\l;fr.a=e Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1L---,w_~_-_O_7 ______ __I
pH Buffer 7.0 I.t> pH Buffer 4.0 ' ... tb
Specific Conductance 1L-.....I4L..:..1...;..Q ____ -II ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1125.7b
Depth to Water Before Purging I ~~~ bO Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 .53. ~ 1 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '"-------'
Conductance (avg) 101:l.. L--~~=-_____ ~ pH of Water (avg) 1L..7~1 ~;;......:..1 _____ ----I
Well Water Temp. (avg) I Pl, f,{) Redox Potential (Eh)1 2...1S TurbidityL..16..;;,..;2.. __ ---J
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp.oC (prior sampling event} .... I2.:_0_D
_-....I
Time I l~3~ I Gal. Purged I )Ot> I Time I )'1LJ D Gal. Purged I J 0 L....;... ___ .....I
Conductance I IOl~ I pH I 7.'-./ I Conductance lor~
Temp.oC I ) L4, b I 1 Temp.oC 11.\.-"1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 2.1 k, I Redox Potential EhO(mV) L..1 .::.2.:..;.,1 =' __ __1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 G4 1 Turbidity (NTU) b'. ~
Time 1 1"14) I Gal. Purged 1 \;2.0 1 Time 11yy:;;l... Gal. Purged 1t....:.1_3 _D __ ....I
Conductance I 101'1-1 pH 1 7,}~ I Conductance 1 )01 1 pH IL../.:...,; . ..;;,..J 'tL...-_....I
Temp.oC I 19,to 1 Temp.oC 1 14 ./06
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 21:!; 1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) L..I ~----..;' 3~_---J
Turbidity (NTU) 1 b~t5> 1 Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1L..-..I..10-"--__ ----'
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 1D,7~ I
o
o
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs IL...L.;/?;..;.W..;....;.;;:A:....L _____ ----'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients m D 100 ml D prI H2SO4 00 D
Heavy Metals D D 250 ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) '1;J D Sample volume D tzI D ~
c.h'o~i~c: If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I q s . ~b Sample Time L-I _14_Y_2 ___ -'
Comment
~ See instruction
Afr~\le~ on >;tc:: a.t Pi2..b. -r;.t'lner' V\Y\a (y{).("(:f\ ?f~.se(d· fo( fU.f~<: 4.t)~ SQrYlr)i~ ~V~f1.j.. p",(~~ 'be~~f) .o.-t-1'"1:14. P\,\f5ed well -h(" '3> fflmu.1e.># wo..+e<" w~ ().. ~ h'-}-·H"(
n,tA.r~. 'P"r~e <.naeJ ,,} 1l.J~2., Len s~~ ... t 1'-\'-1.S
TWN-0410-15-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
JI-~;~M~'.-';N'olE~slljli WHIT:!i:s~~~~~ MILL J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description ~f Sampling Event: 1 -yTh Qv..o..r 1'"t::r AJ Ii 1"0-. f~ 201 ':l..
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 11--r...:..-W_N_-_O_5~ ________ ---,
Sampler Name
and initials: I~YI"er f}o1J,aA~/1J;J
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 10/15/ 'J-O 12-and Sampling (if different) IL../V~/A~ _______ -I
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ..... 1 G.;::....:..-r....;u..;,...r>..;.,;.d-0..;...l}_S ____ -I
Purging Method Used: 002 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event ; Q \.\.o.. ... hl' 1.::1 A.J ,1,. "'"h: Prev" Well Sampled in Sampling Event II--'--:_~_W_JJ_-_l ~ ______ -I
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 LI,a
Specific Conductance Il.....-j...L..Q£....01i---__ --I1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 150. o~
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 ~ 4. f, '-l Casing Volume (V) 4" well:IS2, 47 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L......:;. ___ .......
Conductance (avg) 30lg '----=~=-------~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 14.82 Redox Potential (Eh)1-1 _17.;...7~_--I Turbidity 1 5 .. 4
Weather cond·1 L.. ____ S_\..\_n_nf/ _______ --I
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ..... 1 _7_° __ .......
Time
Conductance
Gal. Purged 1-1 -=~...;;;.O __ --I
pH 1 6 .7 4
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) \"1 '1 1...-___ --1
Turbidity (NTU) S .9
Time 1 J04y Gal. Purged \00
Conductance a..;:13::;...O_'_R __ ....... pH I"· 7'1
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) )77 '-----_ .......
Turbidity (NTU) 1 S.3
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time 1 1Dt.j~ I Gal. Purged I jO I
Conductance I '30 14 I pH I G.80 I
Temp.oC 114·gg I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 17~ I
Turbidity (NTU) 15.5 I
Time 1 lOLlS I Gal. Purged I llD I
Conductance I :s~)g . I pH IG.gO I
Temp.oC 119 ,~:z.. I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ,7<0 1171,
Turbidity .cNTU) 1.5·1 I
1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged lJO gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 11....._..:..10 ___ --1
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I lO. '14 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs AWAL
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs [SI D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients rn D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologics D 0 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ D
chlo ... ; tl( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth lL-.-:=lg;...:..l ..:.....l. 1~'1..~_----I Sample Time lC>4.5
Comment
~ See instruction
A<ri\lC~ on .si), ..... .} 103\, -J..MlGr MA G-~rr;'1l'r .. sCl'1+--for fV.(~'" ",,,01 .$""'pl.~ -evarrt.
P \Art> c:; bz:;~~Y'\ At \ 03~. f v.."('~e~ \.\)e)) tor tJ\. to+A.\ of' 1l tv) intA.+e.s . L.Jc:....-h::r wa.s c.l~r-
fv..('~c:. <:ndcA a.n~ S~Mflc.s colld-J ~ )oyS .. L.Ji-~1~ d\~ 10lig
TWN-05 10-15-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
T8
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
r-------------------------------------------------------------1 ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL I OE~~~l!>~~ FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 t...ph Q""O-N-<:I" N li"ro..1"<:. ':::J.Ol~
~ See instruction
Location (well name): L-1-r_W_N_-_Oh __________ ......
Sampler Name
and initials: fj'Anncf" Ha]},at;f~.J-rJ1
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I lDI )5/2012. and Sampling (if different) -L-I _M_v4 ________ ......
Well Purging Equip Used: l!IJpump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L:16;...:..r_~...;.;nt1f;.....:..:b.s;...;;;:;.. ____ _I
Purging Method Used: l!IJ2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q",..t).Mer M tv;.},,:;} e Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event II-.Ji_W_W_-_O_L_l _____ ---1
pH Buffer 7.0 L-I _7_,0 ___ ----' pH Buffer 4.0 ~.D
Specific Conductance 1-.1 _tf'l_4 ____ ..... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 \3D.Ol>
Depth to Water Before Purging 175.20 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:I 35.7 (, I <.653h)
3" Well: ...... _() ___ ...I.(.367h)
Conductance (avg) "--_ .. IY+-\ogp..J41..-____ ........ pH of Water (avg) L-17.;...,_0_5 ______ .......
Well Water Temp. (avg) l }l-\, Sf Redox Potential (Eh)1 ) ~:L TurbiditylL.-2-_1 __ .....
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) 1 ..... 2._0_6 __ --'
Time 1 \S \L\ I Gal. Purged I 56 1 Time 1 1.5 15 1 Gal. Purged 1L.-_f>_o __ ...1
Conductance 1 ]q7~ I pH 17,07 1 Conductance 11'174 pH 17.65
Temp.oC I 1'1.~8 I Temp.oC I ly, &8
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I \8S I Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I lu.:$;...a.Q'--_----'
Turbidity (NTU) I 2.]. ~ I Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 lSl~ I Gal. Purged I 70 I Time I 'S 1""1 Gal. Purged go
Conductance I ISo] I pH I 7.07 I Conductance 15D:;2.
Temp.oC I 14.gb I Temp.oC 14.8:5
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I '~I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-.1 _17_1'---_----'
Turbidity (NTU) I ,-}.g I Turbidity (NTU) 1.22·?J
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1,---.:...;;lO~ __ ...... T=2V/Q= 17,15 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 10
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 10..:1 ~=NJ_A_L.. ______ ......
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 'KJ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) '[] 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
Ch lor I"jc If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
\
Final Depth ..... 1 -=gs~._lb ___ --I Sample TiJ!le ..... 1 .;.;;:).5:;;;..1..J.7_--..,..-_--'
Comment
~ See instruction
A("r,'~e'A. on srk ~+ lS(}{' "T"I.nn~r o.n~ G-<A(r,~
f~r~~ b~4." ~ '50£:\ \ Pv.r~e~ \NelJ ~( fA.
FeS"nt +Or f'1A<I::l' N1~ S4»1pl;nj e~.:..t.
-to-tl\ \ or f5 }-v1 ,.~ \A te.s. vJ(lI..t~r waS
Most~ Glw..r. p"-%G .,,;nJJ 1111). Sll.Mplct;!, caJ}~ G.t~~ o..t )5 J71 Ld} ~ 11-<= q,+ /S:2.6
TWN-06 10-15-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ,--I _J_W_N_-_O' _________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~(\n-c(" H()ll;a~~111J
Field Sample ill
Date and Time for Purging I 10/).5 fa..o I '2 and Sampling (if different) 10 /1.&/2..01~ ~~~~~----~
Well Purging Equip Used: []!]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) G(",V)J.+~~
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q"' ..... h" E )\J,f, ..... 1"<. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1L-_~_)_w_;J_-_\_D _____ ......I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D
Specific Conductance L-I ---.;;~..;..~..;;..q ___ ....,1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I $1, Z~
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 '-),0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I ~OS. ()C>
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:l~ll~-1_1_----II<·653h)
3" Well:. 0 .c.367h)
pH of Water (avg) $.23 L--_~ _______ ~
Well Water Temp. (avg) Redox Potential (Eh)1 1U Turbidity I }}LJ.}
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)L-1 ~_O_b _---'
Time 1L--1Y_0....l.~ __ ...... Gal. Purged Ia....:):..:::o:.....-__ ......I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 1:2-L] q Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC 115,70 Temp.oC 1 1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ,~, Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 11 \..). 1 Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time IOf,L\t; I Gal. Purged 0 Time IOf,47 1 Gal. Purged 1 0 I
Conductance 1 129S pH 1 b,Z] Conductance I l:l:bO I pH I b .:SO I
Temp.oC 113.31 Temp.oC 1 1:5.tt1 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 100...1 _s_Ctf...:.-_---' Redox Potential Eh (m V) I g 8 g I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 \:is Turbidity (NTU) I 5L 7 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
R.o~r~
V olume of ~ Purged JD gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1 ...... _10 ___ --'
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ;2..2~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I· g~
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs IIo...-A_W_AJ_t. _____ ---'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No, Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) lZ! 0 Sample volume 0 [6 0
G '" )Of\~(. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1103.25 Sample Time 1+
ObL1S See instruction
Comment
A1"(,:~<:! OYl 51Tc g..:t l'-JOO. 'l'~fln~" d\(} tA &0.((\(') f~~~~(\.} tor fV\~~' P\Ar~e b~o.t\ ~ t 1 ~ D"j.
f\A(~ea \t\X.\l ~, ) M;y)",-te:. 'P\Af't~~ v.)e.\\ ~(~. ~,,-1-~r ~~s ,... l~+tlt. MU.("~ bv..+ M05 t(j G)t!..tJt;-~
Pu..1'e,c.. enJeA <fl.} 140'1. Le.f.t s:+<: ~-t \407.
!f'f"l\le!.on &ih~ 0..+ O,yl) .,....~J\~'(,.r ~ncA. (;.l\.rr\1l p('e.sen~ ~o GoJkd-5o.Mf1~. Oeprh +0 W4l\,:t~,...
\N~ ~ qJ,] 0 . S~fIl ?}e~ bO\J')~~ ~t-0 b t15 . L~ ~ l1-v ~t c ~48
TWN-07 10-15-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
or-
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
r----------------------------------------~ ATTACHMENT 1-2
_j OE.,NMIISNO_-... Ns·~~,-~I WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
'--II: -.J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
~ See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: I14Th QV\.o..r+e.r N 11"-rthte. 20 12.
Location (well name): L-11\V __ N_-_O_8 _________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: I-ro.n"~('" +Je»JJJt\..':1Ji»
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I \0) I S 1::;....0 l~ and Sampling (if different) .... 1 M_V_Il ________ --'
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) l6-rlAndJ'o.s
Purging Method Used: [f[]2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sanipling Event I Q'-\<>.d-U·~ N ;+r ... +e Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event F ..... _w_N_ .... _O_8_R _____ .....I
pH Buffer 7.0 .... 17_.0 ____ --' pH Buffer 4.0 q,D
Specific Conductance I ..... _4 ..... 'f..;.,.q ___ ---I1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I \~5. 50
Depth to Water Before Purging I f,2.. ~ 'i Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 54,'~O 1(·653h)
3" Well: 6 (.367h) L--___ .......
Conductance (avg) 23g 1 L--~==~ _______ ~ pH of Water (avg) 7.1J
Well Water Temp. (avg) I I y. 5~ Redox Potential (Eh) ..... 1 _lA_Y...:..-_.....I Turbidity I 20 . .5
Weather Condo IL--C_le_~_r __________ ___I
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ..... 1 '1_5 __ --I
Time Gal. Purged Time 1090) Gal. Purged ..... bo_o __ ----I
Conductance pH Conductance I ';),.'37lJ
Temp.oC Temp.oC I 14.on
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ...:;,.1;4_3~_----I1
Turbidity (NTU) 20·S Turbidity (NTU) I ::;l.O,~ I
Time I DC{ 02.. _ Gal. Purged \ 1 0 ~~----' Time IOGJO:3 Gal. Purged ..... 11;,.....2;_0 __ .....1
Conductance 1 234:t pH I 7.12.. Conductance 1 Z 5'1 S pH I' .10
Temp.oC 1 jLi,Sc> Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ttl: Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ..... 1_2.....;;1 __ ----1
Turbidity (NTU) .2.0.5 Turbidity (NTU) 1 ;;..0.3
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1515 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = ,--I ..... 1...;;;...0 ___ ........ T = 2V/Q = 110·lSb I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I t>
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ..... 1 A_W_A_L ______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 1:1
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 1!1 0 Sample volume 0 m 0
Gh '()f'\ ~e. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 75.:2.:G Sample Time 09D.3
See instruction
Comment
Ar.-;o-e.l. on ~;)-c .... t OgL\S. !;,.ncr "'n~ (""rr;~ p~e.Sef\+ +;,,-'P\A"'~"-<l\nA s"",p);~ eve"t
Pv.('~-c:. b1:~tA(\ ~+ og5' 'P\..\r-~eJ. vv~'l +Or ,,+0+<0.1 or-l!:2., ~l'n",+es. W~+c.(" w<XS GJ~qr
f'\A('~-<:' endec\ 4\.+ O~03. L~++ s;i-~ ~+ 01 og.
TWN-08 10-15-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
20f2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Jo~-;F9~ij~-~ FIELD DA~d=l~~Ji~:~~DWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 '1T~ Qv..~1"'fe,. IV ;+rtJJ eo 2...012..
~ See instruction
Location (well name): I-1-rw __ .N_--..;;..O....;::8;....;R-'--________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: l~l1ne,r Ao1JJ~~/,H
Field Sample ill
Date and Time for Purging 1 10 I J S/::2..(') lQ.. and Sampling (if different) 1..-1 AI~0~~ ________ --I
Well Purging Equip Used: [gJpump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 G-f""\Ah JI-FoS
Purging Method Used: [gJ2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q'""'~{'te-r~ N,'i-l'"'6..t() Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I-I_M_Y._:A _______ ---I
pH Buffer 7.0 1'---7_,_0 ___ ----' pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance L-I _<1..:.-q.;;-.9 ___ ---I1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): IL..-O ____ .....J
Depth to Water Before Purging 1-1 .....;()~ __ ---' Casing Volume (V) 4" well:I~-O----fI(.653h)
3" Well:. () J367h)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) l~. J' Redox Potential (Eh)1 ~).b TurbiditYL-1 ...;;0 __ ---1
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling evept) .... 1 {)_o __ ----'
Time 1 O~3~ I Gal. Purged I '30 I Time 1 I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I '-2 I pH 1 ~,2g I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I \1,\C; I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 12lk2 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged \50 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = L-I _l_D ___ --I T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 ; 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics D! 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 00 0 Sample volume 0 IXI 0 ~
Gh \Of'~Je If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth L-I _C ____ ---I Sample Time IL-O_g_'3_i~ __ --,
See instruction
Comment
Ar("i'\le.~ on s~-te 0..+ Og IS -r~()ner "-t1tA G-~fr;11 'Pt-e.~en+ {or 111V'\~o..+e.
R\1'\SCkte bea.~n 0-..+ O&~l) p \ \ ~ \ v.Mpeo.. ];D G-~l\ons 0+ ~OD..? \No..-re-r fAn~ 100
trT \t-.:)~1-Gr~ S>o..Mr)-e~ +~K"Ul ~~ D~3Li L-e.-F-t ~\+e (A1-OgYb
R ) f)S cA. +e
TWN-OSR 10-15-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 r------------' --.. ----------, I ()ENISON~~~ L......,MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Description of Sampling Event: 1 t..rt~ Q\NA,('ter" A)l~+rd\.+~ 2.01'<.
Location (well name): 11---r_W_tV_-_D----:Gf _________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~rln~(" HO}1I(l;j)1&
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 )oll,I'2oJ'2. and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [i[]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: [![]2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q""V\r+t:,M Nl'triJI.h Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ...-rvJN-17
pH Buffer 7.0 1--1 _7_,_D ___ --' pH Buffer 4.0 1 Y.O
Specific Conductance I&...-..;.Cf--:q .-;.,1 ___ ----'1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 Q7. DD
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 b '2... ~ 'i ~ Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ~2 ,59 1(.653h)
3" Well: b (.367h) &.....-.-_----'
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) lS .. :l'1 Redox Potential (Eh)L-1 ...;...;1 ~::::...3,---_--,1 Turbidity 1--1 _\1---.;' g~_ ......
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)L-1 _2._1_b_----'
Time ...... 1 ).;...3...-..;..q -=-~ _---' Gal. Purged L-I 3~O __ ----, Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 1 ;;... S b~ pH 1 ,,~<q3 Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) J 1> q I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 II, 2> 1 Turbidity (NTU) 1 1
Time I 073Y Gal. Purged b Time I Oi?::J7 I Gal. Purged I CJ 1
Conductance I ISS b pH 1 7 .IS Conductance I Zb9l: I pH 1--;,1,3 1
Temp.oC I 1'3 /~S Temp.oC 11'3,33 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1L-1'--"_0 __ ----' Redox Potential Eh (mV) 11 SO{; 1
Turbidity (NTU) I JY,9 Turbidity (NTU) 11'0 J I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume ofwaM~4r--3~O:---------' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I \0 T = 2V /Q = I L\ ::5D I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 11.'63
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I '3D
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs .... 1 A~W_A_l-_____ ----J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as . Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 1!9 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) N1 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
G'hlor;a{ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth L..I q..;.,S..;.,..._'...;..4 __ ----I Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
A ~r; "d 6Y'1 ~ rt-~ .. t I ~ '-13 -( .. II \?V A 1lJ. G-... ".,. ; '" p'f es.,,,,+ t.r ? U.f{,f . Pv.~,\ c. be~'1 "".J-13 '1,(; P\'\'r~e~ we.\\ .f;;r "'-1-ot .. 1 of':3 rYl: >'lift. h.s. P \Ar~ eel.. vJ el\ 0. r,:j" \,J .... tGr W,,-S C1 ""er . Pv. r e en)" j. ~} l~'1~ I LGn-51\'h~ ~1-1351 ~
Arr:\Je~ on Sl1-G o.t-07.:2..«1. -)o.nhcr~Yl<k G-tA~rIJ." pf'e.seV\.} t~ collecT ~f.lfVIP J~ . Oe~.j-h +0 w~hr
\N£\~ ~A\SD. ~ClMp'e.s. b().ne~ o..~ 013'1. L-e.+} S,1~~Q:.t 0738
TWN-0910-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1-1-r~W_N_-_I _D _________ .....
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 1ArP'J'C(' A o}ll J,;tj/f»
Field Sample ID l"T'wtJ-IO _10 1 £:2.012.
Date and Time for Purging 1 )o/JS/..20J'Z.. and Sampling (if different) 10 /1 ~ 1..201 ~
Well Purging Equip Used: IlLJ 1 pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 &'1 \A n J f~
Purging Method Used: 002 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 ~u~/t1:'(l,j AJaftt1"C Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '--h_W_W_-_6_1 _____ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D pH Buffer 4.0 '1,0
Specific Conductance ,--14...;...1...;...9~ ___ ..... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 '0.5. DD
Depth to Water Before Purging I 8 () , <:f () Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 )5 ,7~ 1(·653h)
3" Well: h (.367h) '-----_ .....
Conductance (avg) 3~'\'1 '-----------' pH of Water (avg) '--13_,&_4 ______ -'
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lSI S~ Redox Potential (Eh)1 3}5'i TurbiditY,--13_'_'~ __ ......
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) I!.....; J;.;;;..3 _& __ -,
Time ,--Il_n._l __ ..... Gal. Purged W '-----_ ...... Time Gal. Purged
Conductance I ~ 'i 9 4 pH I ~,gLJ Conductance pH L-I __ ----'
Temp.oC I \5.5$ Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ?>~y Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ___ --'
Turbidity (NTU) I ~l· Jb Turbidity (NTU)
Time 1 0653 Gal. Purged 1 0 Gal. Purged b '--------' Time 10635
Conductance 13E>i:5 pH 13 .01 Conductance I ~54
Temp.oC 1 J9.00 Temp.oC l ,q,ID
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1L--9=S;..:;..& __ .....J Redox Potential Eh (m V) I,--~ ....... ~~ __ ......
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1..-1 _1-"-0 _____ ----'
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = 1 "3. III 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 L7Y
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1 27.50
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ul A..£..W~A~1-______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered '\ Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients ~ D 100mI D 1!J H2SO4 =E1
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250mI D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 mI D 0 HN03 D
Other (specify) K1 D Sample volume D ~ D
Chlo\)'c\( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I L-1_D_2_.l_~ ___ ...... Sample Time I L-O_b3--=~=---:....._--,
Comment
~ See instruction
A r(;\1<!~ DtI $. i i ~ ",.1-IllS. -'-;"nn d MA. (,-Mr ; '1 rr,,!><'1 r .£" r f' v.. r ~ e . f''''r6~ b~M d\.J-b.l'l
P \A.r ~d, 11><:1 \ .fo... .2. "'" tl "I.t ~~ a. 11 J. 41:) .$e GonAs. . f \Ar ~rJ. I.lr: II drj' woch:-r Io)a!> C Ie", r
}e~ S'+<:: tJt1-1230
Arr;ve~ On ..s,+t: ~t 0 f,2.8. -r;,.nn-c.r d-f\~ GtArrin 'P,-e.sen-t +0 co1led-.s ~ pJes.. DeP-1l, to w~+er
\NlA~ 81. \0 Sd\t'VlP'~ b~;Jea .,d-Ob33. L~ s,'t<::. lA+ O{,3,b
TWN-IO 10-15-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
~
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
,-------------------------------------------------
!OENISONr)j~
~_IN_I: ....... S_"",,",,-...........J
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
I ~fl1\ Q\MArte:r-.N ;tr tJIf <:. :2.0)2
Sampler Name
~ See instruction
Location (well name): lL-f..;....VJ~N_-_l;.....I _________ _.I and initials: I ""-~nt)~ Aoll .. a~
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 'c>/I.b/~Olt2.... and Sampling (if different) ..... 1 ~_~A ________ --,
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) .... 1 GO_('_\M'I_M_o_~ ___ ____'
Purging Method Used: 00]2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv.().c'1-qi!1 N 4;:",i-e Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1 .... -r_\tJ_IJV_-_\ l_R _____ _.I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 L..\.D
Specific Conductance 1 .... ~q~~...:..4 ___ ----II IlMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 11Y2,oo
Depth to Water Before Purging I b <1. 3S Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 '-11. YLj 1(·653h)
3" Well: () (.367h) L...-___ --'
Conductance (avg) 271-12-L--~~ ____________ ~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 14. C>h Redox Potential (Eh)I ...... 3;;..;3;;;;..'l ___ .....I Turbidity .... 1 y .... q __ ____'
Weather Condo I I ~. ~S_~_~n_~~ __________ ~-Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) .... 1 b_() __ .....1
Time IO'62J) Gal. Purged 7() Time 10$.:2.) I Gal. Purged I 80 1
Conductance 1.2111 \ 1 pH I ~185 1
Temp.oC I lq. ~b I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~'-\O I
Turbidity (NTU) I t..i~ I
Time l o82..~ I Gal. Purged I Jo~ 1
Conductance I 71q:) I pH I f;.BS I
Temp.oC 119. '7 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 13 3~ 1
Turbidity (NTU) 151 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 100 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = L-I ...;..1 D ___ ----' T = 2V/Q = I q,l-\g I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ..... 1 _A_~_It_L _____ ----,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients l!1 D 100mI D ~ H2SO4 "EI
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250mI D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) [I D Sample volume D -(J D
Gh \O(~~G If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 4~. g [) Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
Ac-r>">eA 0)"1 ~rt <:: .J 0(, 10. --1'6.{In er 0Ir1~ G-lAIr; 1) p(,(;Se,rt--Gr f u.."~ ""~ .sa.W\f')\~ e \) e.n} .
fu..(~e. b'5G\t1 0.1-OB)3. 'f'o.(~c\ I.<>el\ .to ... 0.. ~1-o..\ '* \0 m;llu:1e!:. W ... ter ~ mos-H~ cl.w:
rv..('~-c e()~e& a..ntX S~fVlp)~S con~L,+~~ 4 Dt23. LGrt SJ+G ttt o.82.C
TWN-11 10-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
1J
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1L-.~_W_N_-_\;...;.l ...;..R _________ --,
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~nYlC' Hl>)J/J<1~IrJ:l
Field Sample ID l-rwA) -11 R ... 101Q-o 1'2..
Date and Time for Purging I lb/\,!.!2.0)<' and Sampling (if different) ..... 1 ;....;N.;...;.II....;..~.;;.... _______ ----1
Well Purging Equip Used: @]pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I U(\A(lJfos
Purging Method Used: @]2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q\).ort~('~ N ,:tr{};.-tt: Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ..... ~_1 _W_W_-_12 ______ ---1
pH Buffer 7.0. ....1 _'_i_D ___ ----'
Specific Conductance L..-I ...;..'19...:,..4.:...-___ -11 !lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging ..... 1 _0 ___ --'
Conductance (avg) L...----J1u.cQ;..:..' '1...:.-_____ --'
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): L..-I _0 ____ ......
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~--:C5~ __ -tI(.653h)
3" Well:. L> . (.367h)
pH of Water (avg) L...-\.....£..:l.:....tf:....L..L.l _____ ----I
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \'Lty Redox Potential (Eh)1 t1 g7 TurbiditYL..-1 _1_.2. __ ......
Weather Condo .... 1_G_'_C_fA_( __________ --J
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)IL-.'"-i_o __ --'
Time I OJ5£> Gal. Purged 13D Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance ..... 1 )_0_, 9 __ ----' pH 1'-1.44 Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I rt Zj Temp.oC 1 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L..-1 Cf....;...;;.~..&..7 __ ...... Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time Gal. Purged Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance pH Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged lSD gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = IL.--_\_D _____ ----' T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) D
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1-1 A~W..;..:A~L _____ ----I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below)
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250m!
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 m!
Other (specify) rn. 0 Sample volume
C h 'DII'~C
Final Depth 1 ..... _......;;6~ __ ----I Sample Time o75L
Comment
y N
0 0
0 ~
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 m
Y
HCL 0
H2SO4 Iii
HN03 0
No Preserv. 0
HN03 []
0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
I:J See instruction ~
Af("~\)~d.. 0)'\ S It~ 1\.1' D7'-tQ. -r~Ylv\<.r"' di.Y\tA G~(ri n p(e.&~t\1 ~r r ,'n.s:et+c!!".
'R;Yl~Q.1-c b~~t'\t'\ ~ 07L..j1.. PV.MP"'c\ nO (,.~nO(l~ oi=' .so~p w~+G,.~f'a 100
&~J \Dn~ o-t Dr: ",Jo,:~~r. R:(\S(A.T~ ~n ae~ O\t'ltl S~rIlp )c.s LolJ~c.+ed ()\, t ~
Left S \1--(, ~-r-D,S15,
075~,
TWN-IIR 10-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
ri
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
[---··--·····----··-··-·-·----···-·-1 I OENIS.ON')j~1
L. MINI:S . .
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
~ Q\i(»r~ j\J if('~t-(.l ~l2.
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 <?_l\_.vJJ_-.....;,2.~ ____ ~------'
Sampler Name
and initials: fi;nn-t.,.. "lJo}} I'J~~IrH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 '01 I b /2.J:Jl'2.. and Sampling (if different) 1..."'-/'./...:;.I....I.b..:..-______ ----I
Well Purging Equip Used: IT[] pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 Gr\Aflllfo..s
Purging Method Used: [1[]2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 Qv..~f+e.rLJ Ni"l'rt1\tG Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..... 1'_W_N_-_O_Ll _____ ----I
pH Buffer 7.0 .... 1 _'_I D ___ ---I
Specific Conductance .... 1 _1_1-1..' ___ ----II ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I ';)..1. hb
Conductance (avg) .2Y oy L..-____ ~ __________ ~
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): 11 0,00 L--____ ----I
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ?'-!.Ob l(0653h)
3" Well: ..... , _0_' __ --',(.367h)
pH of Water (avg) '7.30 L--~~ __________ ----I
Well Water Temp. (avg) 114, '1..' Redox Potential (Eh)1 3~l Turbidity I ADI
Weather Condo 1L--_G_)e._~_r _________ ....1
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) .... 13_b
__ ----I
Time I 07.1.4 Gal. Purged
Conductance I :2.3"l2>
Temp.oC 11Q,2\
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 3i1O
Turbidity (NTU) I ~) '3
Gal. Purged L.....\,,;11....;...0 __ ---I1 Time &....;;1 O-..:7-=3~1 __ ....I
Conductance 12 q 10 pH 1 7 .3 )
Temp.oC I lq .:z.S
Redox Potential Eh (m V) &....;1 ~_O __ ----,
Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time ID730 I Gal. Purged 1 100 I
Conductance I 2..'iOI I pH I 7"~1 I
Temp.oC 1 )LL30 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~~<. I
Turbidity (NTU) 12 10 1
Time 10732. I Gal. Purged I Ja..O I
Conductance 12Q09 I pHI ,?,sl I
Temp.oC 119.,28 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 31~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~OO I
1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged J~O gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = ..... 1 _'D ___ --' T = 2V /Q = I l o. 81 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs L..IA~\i)_'A....;L ______ ---I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs D 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 1B 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals D 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies D 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) n 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
c.nlor i~e If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I \ 0 b .'1:3 Sample Time
Comment
~ See instruction
Arri\le~ On 6rre. 011-071{, -ra.nner "JIll. G-Mr:t'\ p('~en} -£.-~l.\\i~ "'fl~ -SAmp))~ alieni,
'Pv..r5e.. b~~O\n 0.1-071D ~ P\Ar~e.A \N ell Br-q... ~o+o.\ ot l:l. Minutes. v.)o..1~r h~ ~V1 oraY! e..
GDlor +0 if bu.+ ~\OWb G",;",re~ -Q-\'rou~\hOv..~ ~l.Ar~e-. '?l.Ar~<.. e.t1d~ ... nd,. Stlftlf1Q GOJle~
IA-t oI3~.Lt;~ ~\+e o..-t 0735
TWN-12 10-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
'El
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 r ~'~"~';~~-~Ij~'11
~I~I:S . J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 qTh Q\A.lAr+c:=.r /\J\\frO\i~ .2..C,1~
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Sampler Name
and initials: I-';'n,,~r HollIJ<.\~/-rH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 10/ 1 5/2.01 '"l.. and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: I~ Ipump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 G('~ f} ,ffc s
Purging Method Used: ,[~IJ2 casings [QJ3 casings TWN-Og
Sampling Event 1 GV-.CA.("i-Gt"b N ,"'+(0\+ c.. 1
-i'''iJJY .. ~o Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..... _' ____ .,J _____ ----'
pH Buffer 7.0 ..... 1 _.,,_,0 ___ ----1 pH Buffer 4.0 1 4.0
Specific Conductance ..... 1 ---:1-:.q...:.~ ___ -...,.---,1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 1.2..0.00
Depth to Water Before Purging 145, $4 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:I YE. 31 1(.653h)
3" Well: b (.367h) '--------I
Conductance (avg) 1203 I....-~~------~ pH of Water (avg) L-I 7----.,;' 7~g _____ ----I
Well Water Temp. (avg) 115. O~ Redox Potential (Eh) 1 13.2. TurbidityIlO,y-,<
Weather Condo ..... 1_S_lA_fl_Y'l_t __________ ---1
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)lL-b_b __ .........
Time 1000SD Gal. Purged 70 Time I OCfSI I Gal. Purged 1 "3lJ I
Conductance ..... 1 -I-ll1t=O_' __ --' pH 7·77 Conductance I 120",-I pH 1 7.,gO I
Temp.oC 1 15-0Q Temp.oC I 15.0", I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ,--...:.cI2;=~:..x. __ --' Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 133 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 4 ;:3 Turbidity (NTU) I 10·S I
Time ..... 1 O_Gf...:;;;5;.,;;;.;2.""--_--' Gal. Purged Time 10 95:'5 I Gal. Purged I 1'2)0 I
Conductance pH Conductance 112.0 I I pHI 7·81 I
Temp.oC 15.oS Temp.oC 115.05 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) l.3g Redox Potential Eh (mV) I t~l I
Turbidity (NTU) \ ( . q Turbidity (NTU) 111.0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged 100 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L-I _1_0 ___ ........
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I cL €, 7 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I f)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 10
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I ..... A...;...W_It_L ______ ........
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml D 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
(,\'lor~~( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 1 84 t 65 Sample Time 0'\53
Comment
~ See instruction
'P\A.o(~t. b-ett~fl tJ\.~ ()'fli3. 'Pl.A"~t:'A w(',11 00' J' I f'\ ·L ~ ~ ~ 70T ~ T07<i .0<:1-' 10 M\ntQ""e~ '\
~o..i--e< ~o.S MO.si-\~ G\c:o.(. f v..r~G ~llcAe:A a..n~ ~et""'fJ~~ Lo)JCC,+cd. a.-t O~.s3.
L-e..n-s a-G ~+ 045~
TWN-13 10-15-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
r··········_······_········· ···············_·_··-1 !OENISON~J.4 . ~Nt:S I FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I '1Th 0~o..r+er N\'+1"'~+~ 20\2.
Sampler Name
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1-1 _-r.;;...W--.:...N_-...,:\--='1 _________ ----I and initials: 1 -r~Y1y\<'" H"niJ4~ /TJf
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I 10/lb/~\"2, and Sampling (if different) ..... 11_0..:../_'_7/_2.._0 _J z, _____ ----I
Well Purging Equip Used: [f[]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1'--C-_r_u_1J;...:a~+.;;;.1s~ ___ ___'
Purging Method Used: 002 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q\A()..i"-t~r~ j\Jl:t-~""1'G Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I-_-rl_W_W_--_I_-b ______ ....J
pH Buffer 7.0 1L....-7_,_0 ___ ---I pH Buffer 4.0 4.D
Specific Conductance 1-1 _'f;...q....;'1 ____ ...J1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 135. DO
Depth to Water Before Purging I b 2. , '-\ S Casing Volume (V) 4" well:I Y7.~7 1(·653h)
3" Well: () (.367h) L......;; ___ --I
Conductance (avg) I 0 ~ ) '---~~-~----~ pH of Water (avg) 7. go "--~~---------I
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 1 S . 0'-\ Redox Potential (Eh)1 -:.>50 Turbidity'--11:.......l15.c::::.-_ ___'
Weather Condo 1-1 __ S_Vl._1\VI_f __________ ---I
Ext'\ Amb. Temp. °C (priorsamp\ing event}L..:11...;:::.3::...b __ --I
Time \05g' Gal. Purged 5D
Conductance pH 17.g0
Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 ..:::~;...:g5~ __ ...J
Turbidity (NTU) I ] lif3 I
Time 1 ()IIS Gal. Purged o
Conductance 1 I :t:lb pH 1 .... 7_. 1.....;7:.....-_...J
Temp. °C I ) 3, ~ 9 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) .... 1 ....;..16.....:::2:;;.....;..._---1
Turbidity (NTU) G.:;
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC 1 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I Ol/&, I Gal. Purged I 0 I
Conductance I 1~i1l) I pH I 7 • .2.0 I
Temp.oC 1 lQ.Dl5 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 15~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I t2..j I
1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
. B-e,-tofe,
Volume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1..-1 ~l 0 ___ --1 T = 2V /Q = I q 4 '-17 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I LeiS
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated I '5D
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1-1 .:..,:A:.,.:.W..:...:A:...!.-l-_____ ----l
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 a D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) M D Sample volume D ~ D ~
G~lo,...;~( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I ) 33. ~-b Sample Time 0/15
Comment
~ See instruction
At""ri\)cA 0\'\ ~i+G <'-+ Ie) Eto -(Armer o..f\4 G"..rr.'A ~n Slt~ +6(' pv..,.~e. f~~e. be:J~1'1 "f-'''53
P ~r~ e4 v:>'" 11 -fO! 01\. <f-&t",1 of' !6 yY1 i I') lA. t G-S , Pv.r ~ d v-:> e I \ J.r.:}. w",.} c(' wa-s "I. J, :J-.J.-) e /">J LA rl(J.-
\rJ ,ih 1;01>\ G .Y-t n). if) it, ? ",r ~ e. "'r)j~ 7I"V!' q...t 1058'. L ~f'.J-,s J 1-6 4:1-' II () '1
/trt""l\1e! "Y\ st-te ~ O-r II . ,-o.r')ner-NItA. G-wrt'fl pr~e,d-+o coJlecr ,sDlMF 'ti. Deif>~ tb \N~er \Net..)
b';L.7:J... 50\tv\p'GS bo."luA ~-r OilS. LeW ..sik ~ 07JQ
TWN-1410-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I j)ENlsoNI).4~ r-------------·----------·-I
L......MI",!ES--.-J
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
f LlTh Q\,\O.,r+e(' )\j,!1""r p\.=1"c QO 1'2,
~ See instruction
Location (well name): ..... 1 ~_W_N_-...::LS~ _________ ......
Sampler Name
and initials: l-rAn71er tJ~ n}J(A~lrH
Field Sample ill
Date and Time for Purging 1 lO/If,/2..01'2. and Sampling (if different) 10117/.2J>J?..
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: I![] 2 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event IQv..lArt ... rl~ bl .. l~
i rAle: I -rwAJ-] J Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..... _________ ......
pH Buff~r 7.0 1 7.0 1 pH Buffer 4.0 L.-\. 0
Specific Conductance 1 ..... _4_'1 ..... 1 ___ --'1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I lS5, 0 C:l
Depth to Water Before Purging I q I. 80 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 L4 ).2(;, 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) 1.--___ ......
Conductance (avg) '--...;..I...,:.y....;,q1-+-_____ ----' pH of Water (avg) ~.qy ~~~------~
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lY. bY Redox Potential (Eh)1 '35b Turbidity ..... 1 ~~.;:;..g __ ......
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) ..... 1 _8_6
__ ......
Time l oqOl I Gal. Purged I GO 1 Time Gal. Purged
Conductance I lYt14 1 pH 1 b,~Y 1 Conductance pH ,--I __ ----'
Temp.oC 119."4 I Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 13:,r: I Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 ___ -II
Turbidity (NTU) I qg I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I 07()~ I Gal. Purged 1 lS I Gal. Purged 0 ........,;;;------' Time I 0767
Conductance 1175G I pH 1 ~ ."z 1 Conductance 1 \ I 6::2: pH 1 G).'1Q
Temp.oC I l9/J-b 1 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ]bU I )'==-O Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 1 \.;.....S_9 ____ ~
Turbidity (NTU) 1 1.1 I Turbidity (NTU) I q .q
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume .fr~e~'Purged 1,....--::0~O~---.., gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1.-1 _\....._0 ___ ---' T=2V/Q= I g,~5 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I )~ LlS
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 16 0
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs .... 1 A;...;;.....w....l'*~1-_____ ----I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs 0 D 3x40 ml D 0 HCL D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D ts H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologics 0 D 250ml D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 D HN03 D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D ~ D
C. h lo(';Je If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I 15311 1 5 Sample Time O'"1DY
See instruction
Comment
A'(r:\Je.A. 01'\ ~Ii-e ' 0..+ og5~ ~f\11~"" t1>.'f\().. &~r{""il'\ pfe.s~ -+or ?",,..~e . ?u..-('~e, b:,jDl.Y\ 11.+ 0855
P"'('1),e.l. well .fo ... "'-~oh\ or " ""'nv.1e5.. lA)o..-tcr u.'l~ )V\o~.J.\~ c1"-,,,<". 1" "r~c:J. wei I .:;(r~ I.
N
D
D
0
D
D
~
P~r~c ~nat!~ #.1-010\. Le+t S ,t~ I\.-t oqOtt
Ar("\)eA 0\'\ 51·+C. ~1" 06'Sg. --r;;\n.-tc( 4\nJ rr,..(rl·~ p,ecS~t-i-z> c.t)Jl~c-} .sJ(W1f]~.s. De?+J... -to fA)0I.+eT"
vJ~~ GIl, 75 ~ $4Wlf'eS b~\'l~d ~. 070~. Left-s;t~ ~-}-0708
TWN-15 10-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
,----------------------------------------------1 I OENISON~~~ L MIN~$t _..-.l
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
1 y,..h QW).r+e<" I\J ~f,~+~ .2.012
~ See instruction
Location (well name): .... 1-r_w_VV_-_lb~ _________ __'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1~Y1r1er AoJl/J~hH
Field Sample ill Iiw.N -\ b .. 1016.2012.
Date and Time for Purging 1 '()/1~!.20)2 and Sampling (if different) ..... 1 _tV._IA'--_______ ---'
Well Purging Equip Used: [][]pump or [gJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 .... 6_T"_\A_n_ll_t_D_S ____ ---J
Purging Method Used: []!]2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 Quo..("1-c:rb A>\}('G(t-c Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..... 1 ~_W_jJ_-_]_8 ______ .....J
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 _tif..;..q_j ____ ---'I ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 lO().DO
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 Q7. bO Casing Volume (V) 4" well:I '3>LJ.:ll ICo653h)
3" Well: .... __ O ___ .....J.(.367h)
Conductance (avg) \g~ 1 '---~~-----------~ pH of Water (avg) /.63 '--------------------'
Well Water Temp. (avg) 119.1 2 Redox Potential (Eh)1 ~45 Turbidity I .... ..:....;J 6"'--_---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) .... 1 ...;..ll_b __ ~
Time 10J3 Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged -.... 1 _5_o __ __'
Conductance I l~3g pH 1 7 .. Of, Conductance -1 1 ~ '3>7
Temp.oC 1 1q.J~ Temp.oC 114,/3
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 13:15 Redox Potential Eh (m V) ..... 13=-::4.5 _____ -'
Turbidity (NTU) '3 Turbidity (NTU) g
Time I 1015 Gal. Purged 60 Time ..... 1 _1 D_l;..,;;:ab'--_ ..... Gal. Purged 70 L..-..,;,...~_---'
Conductance 11 f>;t~ pH 17 .0 '3 Conductance I I g2L) pH 1 7.Cl
Temp. °C I 19. rl Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ..... 1 _3_qs~ __ ..... Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 .... ~_~5-",,-_---,
Turbidity (NTU) )g Turbidity (NTU) 14
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater ' 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 7D gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = Lo-I ---,-I 0"'---__ --' T = 2V /Q = I G. S 4 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 0
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 10
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs 1 ...... /t...;.,w.::..;;.:..A;...t.. ______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients I~l 0 100 ml 0 "'f] H2SO4 ID
Heavy Metals D 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics D 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha D 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) m 0 Sample volume 0 iKI 0
Gn 1or;A~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth ,--I _y ;...;;;.g.;... '1 ...... '0 __ ----' Sample Time lOlb
Comment
~ See instruction
Atr;v~cl Orl s.1"h~ d\.t lCO-5 ~(I"cr 6(nA (T11I.(n'" prt'se,J +Or ?"'~~ dtvtttt ,.Sqmr<!.j eve-n1-.
'Pv..r~-e k-t!!!fjrAf) od-1001, P\Ar~~.). Wt::l\ for'" +6+CAI c>t' 7 Minu+-es. WeeTer Wt'i.S C1e6;r.
Pv..1'~~ ~nt1~! ~V1J. ~~Wlplc5 Gt>ll~<.1-~J ~ 10', Le--0-SIte, t:?t1-10J'1
TWN-1610-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
'EJ
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
f--·------·----------. ..--~
IOENIS. ONI)~~I j MINI:S -.J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1'-1'1"1, Q"'(A(+er j\J,1=rA:}~ 2.0]'2..
~ See instruction
Location (well name): 1L..--t"W..:...-_f'J_-_'7 __________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: bAtlrJ~r +}t>JJ,JII.!1)'rH
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I \ 0/1'(' /26 J ~ and Sampling (if different) lDJ J7!20 J'<
Well Purging Equip Used: IT[] pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I (;.(W1JJ.~.!;
Purging Method Used: I]!] 2 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Q\I> o.t":te..-l~ N ~·h·IJ\:k Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1L..-r_vJ_JJ_-_J_<J ______ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 I.b
Specific Conductance Ir....-GJ_9;....Z1 ___ --'1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging I 3'3. ~ '-I
Conductance (avg) \ 12"b L..-_~~ _____ ~
pH Buffer 4.0 11.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I \ 1 b. 06
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 '1lf. U 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L-..,;;::....-__ --'
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lS-~S Redox Potential (Eh)1 \ b ~ TurbiditYL..1 't...:...;;..7 __ --'
Weather Condo L..1_S_~_f\_nj __________ ...J
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)L..ll.:....;q:,...,o __ --'
Time I l~()3 Gal. Purged L..I-=W~ __ --, Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance ) ):2.0 pH 17 .9) Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC 15.36 Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ' ..... ..;..-1 b;;:;..::;3~_---I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I q7 Turbidity (NTU) I ,
Time 10/3:5 Gal. Purged Time I 07215 I Gal. Purged I 0 I
Conductance pH 1 7 ,38 Conductance I J13b I pH 1--;,3'K I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I P1.o5 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) \ R 1 &.--.;-=-----' Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 183 I
Turbidity (NTU) ,.5 Turbidity (NTU) I Il;, I I -~..-..
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water ~~Jof~~e..:=-G""'-""D-------' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1..-1 ..---=\ O~ __ -..-I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I 9. Cf7 I
I ),1-D
16D
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs .... 1 ~A:..;.W---:A~l-_____ ----..I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL · D
Nutrients t!I D 100 ml D 1'!!1 H2SO4 l!J
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250m! D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) ~ D Sample volume D D( D
C 'h I01;de. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth .... 1 ..:..lo---:;Z;;.....--I,.}..I..1 __ --' Sample Time
See instruction
Comment
A('("I\Je4 0\1 sit~ ",-7 I;}..S:S --(~nflt:'r el\t1J • (j..~rr;f) 1'1e~e,.d" ..rOy'" pv.rje. P"''(Je .b<tjQn p..r 1.2:67
PlA.'-~~ we\] .fo ... fA.. -to 1-4. 1 of' b rtl'V1.x\-~S. ~/lvtc( \N~s. yv)Vl.r~ v.ol1h S6V>1e. S",..,J. fMhc.le.s.
N
D
D
D
D
D
~
P~~~. ""~\l ~('~. P"'f'~e. U],le6. "';. 1:30'3. LG~ s;+c oJ 13Qf.
Am\! ea on bIte ""i-07'20. -(''1/11'\(.'' "",J." (""",r;" f'f'''''G''~ .1-<, C6 II e ,,1-S~fVJp le.s _ D"'pth t-o w",ter-
W<A.~ 33.f>g SI1\Wlp)e& b~il-t4 ~T 672.5 L-e~ ..s)t~O\.t C7::J...~
TWN-1710-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
, ¥Aill e~.~rO~t1Q~~·i¢tm$i;~afgtH>~f:mit' t~) ,
. 'btQ~~~w~t$;ivj:¢hit~tri1~9u~nty A$$9~~!:i~~ jPi?rt,{QAP)' -
'. ~:, .,Aft AC,~mJSTJ-~·. ' .. '
~!:lnTE~tESA URA:NllT~rl\!nLL .
. "FfELD DAIA \VORKSHEET:FOR GROUND\VATER . '~SQdPti~n,ofSanipU~~Eveilt '~t~&~:fk ,;,:e .. ·e, ,,',
San~pl~r ':Name ' 'Loc:~tl(}n(\Vt;l,I t~afueJ;' L~~AJ:'~l~, ,m, and ln14<l~s:
. Da~~allqTm:te wt P\lrg~g C l!'?Zlh;;;.,..l:;;.... ...•. ~_Q:..;,..~j_:<,;,;." """,'. ~ ............ ~_], and Smm:rl:i:ng (if-different)
·~.·.Nen. PUf.fg.l:li .. !':!., E. {l. ui.p·.· USf.;.d: f. mi. rlMuhv, or rtrlb.:ane. t-, _. _' I , .. , .. r' 'if:'. '~.i ':'
. .
Pltrglng 1\1ethod Used: . . ~]i cash1~s' [EQ3casing$
pHBnfil.tr7.0 :~~ '" C4.~6 .;:='.·., ....... ~].
Specific CtHldu:c::tatice ' ~,.,...;~~~"""
.. J' .. ' .... .. . pH()fwm~f(il .. g) .... ~ •... CO$ldu~ance (~tvgj .' C~~1; ':.~ •• :
.\VeU \Vwter Ternp. {ayg} : :lm)g·l~j·{~::·::~:]·
. . . , ~, Re-'tQ~:Pot~~Hal {Ek)l:~;'~~f "" J
.. ~~trf A;m:b .. T~P. ~c. fprl:~r:~ampH {!g ~y:~~t}.:i~!.:,o.:.;H..,..,.,~ ~,..,.....,....:--,f
"'T'. .•... ot:"" ,:~emp .. (,
.' ~...-
:jur~i~lo/ (Nil~:) '.
:tjill~ ~t)~~ . I <:llf.Pttigli4
. :conduct~nicf;·::'L ;z.11?1 .'.· ... 3 .· :pH
, .:B:edox p()'t¢~jtial Eh tt1l:V} ~~r~lf.~'=~·l ,
C'f'-!5 ',' '.' >'l ~ :~.', > •• '~. . 'TU1~b1dHY (N1U)
~.'
'"
wnjte~1e$fil r.4m
Field. Data Works,hei2it for {)n:mndwater
'nme C~~>·,: >>f ~"
",6~'1l?' .;<-'
: C:\.in~hJ:c~~nc¢·;,· Ji--i:,~""'~?-J""';. ~""':Y;,;;,',,'rn
, Tetllp. ¢t ,.
, Redox PoteiH,ial][tb (UlV)d~'~i1::~~~a
.' . -'.. "~~ )-,;.~ . ," .. ~ .,
. ~ --.
Noii.~'f,;r&q~9~t~r pr?¢h~fge~et~IJ '.. .. .'",,, ;; .,; -('i:f-o~i'ld~C!t~'ftMQnittirrrtj!fQi:,l~!ftY'Asstjl'ariC9 'Pta.n {?,,\P'), '.
~~~""""""'~';;"""+"4 .~~~~·.L ·' ··:,gal~ori(s}.
. . Nwnb¢tof casl11g 'VQ'ilrf.ll~'S 'e:v~wu~t~d(tf b:l~¢l' thf!lr:~~,?).'
vacs
l~\!ll>~tl; ~'! . ..;.;;..,~ f&:"w;.;f)-;.~: :-"l'. ~~"
1
,-,r .
~$alilpte 'Vof(in4i:c~ne : '
. ' .. '. :ff' o.thert~fail a,s
ge¢b.~1()!~v) .
" ~-
. ~C~tl~fuenf . .. .. ... .... .... .... .... .... .. .. . . .. . . . .' . "'>
'.' ;Ar;;~~ ··.n .··.$;-hi .. ~l···~'ta~)ff.~"r~;;~~,~~i~,\f~fs!"ttf .. ·;§( .~~rlA¢,.~£·J~~rlil •• e~~M: •..•. :;·'
;'r.~c£\e be&G\1\ ~t O,q'~!u: PL&~5~ ~~ll ;€;r ~,'~~t~~\ q¥' l~.-"M~~~te~"'~~;+er\,,Q~s~',:11:~ff~~'
,:: MMr~j ~ ?~('~¢ -. ~t1J~c~ ~n~ )5ttk1pJ~,s -,~~iJ~:(~·fe~f ~,i-~>oq~l.~, ,~e:,!f4. -,.$, i:~ fit :ft ~~4~ ,
, . . ...• ~ . ..~.' H':' .. ', . • .:~. .t. .... ;..~', '.~.~ • ,., ..,:.,:,,;, :. .• '::.' , • ~~. . ", ':. , ".;./::;
. -, -
\Vhj~~ i-\\he$,q f'y'liH
: Ffi:1ild Dat;jWo;r~sheet f~r Gi:p~tidwater ..
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
!~ENI50NIj.4.4 1
i MINI:S
Description of Sampling Event:
ATTACHMENT 1-2
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
1 y Tl1 Q\A.IA(:}: <.f /J ,+( '" + ~ '.2 0) 2-
~ See instruction
Location (well name): L-I-_l _W_N_-_'_i1 _________ ----I
Sampler Name
and initials: IYf'lne-r ijoll:J~)-rJ.J.
Field Sample ID--+t1?+-w'AJ:;:Ifl::10 1-"? c J ~
Date and Time for Purging 1 10/1 f,! :2.01'2.. and Sampling (if different) ..... 1 ~_:/._A ________ --,
Well Purging Equip Used: l-m Ipump or @] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 16-(\.Aflll+CtS
Purging Method Used: 002 casings @]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q'-I. .. .-l-u-l"l j\) i ho..+<. Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1L-J'_W_JJ_ ..... _l_Y _____ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0
SpecifiC Conductance L-I C1..;..q...;;..,4-'--___ ...... 1 ~MHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 S.!2. .1S
Conductance (avg) 1~t.t3 '--~~------------~
pH Buffer 4.0 \.1.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): J....l11:...:.,1_0 _,0_0 __ ----I
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:I 7>7,77 I <.653h)
3" W ell:L-. --JooI:¢:....-_----I. (.36 7h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 lS. OJ Redox Potential (Eh)IL-'_'_o __ ....J TurbiditYL-1 _1-6 __ ----1
Weather Condo I ( . .::> u.. YI ,.,,1 Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)lL-l_b_o __ -I
'-----------------1
Time I 1221 Gal. Purged Time 1 12~':2.. Gal. Purged 6 b '---------I
Conductance -L-1l....:.~_~O __ ---I pH 17.33 Conductance lL-l_'1q_~ __ -I
Temp.oC 11 ;;,07 Temp.oC 1 15,D8
Redox Potential Eh (mV) \'1'3 '--------' Redox Potential Eh (m V)I L-_'7_' __ ----11
Turbidity (NTU) 1 1 b . q Turbidity (NTU) I 16. (? I
Time 1 )223 Gal. Purged Time 1 '~2'i Gal. Purged ~~~tJ __ --,
Conductance L-Il Zf_5_D __ --' pH 17 .:31 Conductance L-11_11 4_' __ --' pH 17 ,36 I
Temp.oC 1 \S.og Temp.oC 1 1S,07
Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I '_i _' __ ----I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1L-'_68 ___ --'
Turbidity (NTU) 11(;.5 Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 80 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = L-I -=.l~O ___ ---, T=2V/Q= I 7,5"5, I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 10
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1 0
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs .... 1 Ar.L.;.W..:.A..;;...L-______ --l
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y
VOCs D D 3x40 ml D D HCL D
Nutrients ~ D 100 ml D ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 D· 250ml D D HN03 D
All Other Non Radiologics 0 D 250ml D D , No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha 0 D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume D m D
Ch\o(·J~e. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 110b.5Y Sample Time 1-1 .;,::;;12=2_~~ __ ....J
Comment
~ See instruction
It (6 \)~~ 0" $;+""'+ \2.13. -r.:,., nV' ... ,., a G-.. rr:" prG~"+~"'" ?V-f'~e. an~ S IIrvJp )~ 1:"er> l
t>"'r~ ~ b~o.n 0.1 121C Pv.(~e'\ ~.\l ft;.. 8')'VI ,'"tA -res. Atk-(. M;".rl.:s ",,,II ~rl-.. &
h S?,,"1-'}';:, blA-t kep1-'-If'-IN .... -ter ~C1.5 elVA"· 'f'vI.~e. Ct'lJd. o.(Id. $,)tl'1f I('s coil ec1e4
~t P:2t1· Le.~ S\\}.~ ~ 12.2j
TWN-19 10-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
D
D
13
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
~---------------------------I ATTACHMENT 1-2
I OE~F9lPjj I FIELD DA~~~=~~~F~~~:~~DWATER [~ See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: .... 1 y~T_"_Q_\A_().._r_"h_e_1'"_AJ_-_\_+_('_~_f._e ___________________ ---J
Location (well name): .... 1-r_W_N_-_h_b _________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: Ff",,,nc,r HoJl/J~~/-r-H
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging 1 \ 0/1 J /20' 2. and Sampling (if different) .... I M_0_~ ________ ---'
Well Purging Equip Used: [gJpump or [gJ bailer \~~-----------~ Well Pump (if other than Bennet) '-1N. __ /.....;:17 ___________ ......
Purging Method Used: [gJ2 casings [gJ3 casings
Sampling Event 1 Q~o..('+c:("~ Nfh·~f<. Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I '-f'_iG_z_-_6_.l _____ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance ,-I _1-"-~_~ ____ ..... I!-lMHos/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging IL--_O __ ---'
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): IL....-() ____ ~
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~_o __ ---iI(.653h)
3" Well:. l) . (.367h)
b.bD
Well Water Temp. (avg) J.. \. b~ Redox Potential (Eh),-I _:2_11 __ ..... Turbidity 1'---0 __ ---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) .... 1 ~_o_tJ_---,
Time 1 .... O_q_o_q __ --' Gal. Purged ..... 1 0 ___ ---' Time 1 I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance .... 1 _0_, _% __ ---' pH 1 b.C;O Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~ • 1 2..11 Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 I
Turbidity (NTU) 10 Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time Gal. Purged Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance pH Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC Temp.oC 1 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 0 T = 2V/Q = I l)l
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs ..... 1 _A_W:.......:..A.:....L _____ --I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate
Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml
Nutrients ~ 0 100 m1
Heavy Metals D 0 250ml
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 m1
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume
Ghlof;~-c.
Final Depth .... 1 __ 0 ___ --1 Sample Time .... 1 O_q_t_Q __ ----I
Comment
L..-_TWN_· _-6_0_1_0_-1_7_-2_0_1_2--1IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Filtered
Y N
0 0
0 rB
D D
0 0
0 0
0 ~
Preservative Type Preservative Added
Y
HCL 0
H2SO4 ~
HN03 0
No Preserv. 0
HN03 0
0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
r:J See instruction ~<#j
N
0
0
0
0
0
.21
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 r------------------il I O.EN,soNI)~~1
J MINI:S :J FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
D~~cri~tion of Sampling Event: 1 Ljl'h Ov..o..rl-e.r tJ ?fi'~ +e :2..012..
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Location (well name): 1L-"""T'~W~tJ_----""b=.s=-_______ ---,
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~nner J.}o}}/J~IrH
Field Sample ID EfwAl .... 6S_10 1~2..012,
Date and Time for Purging 1 10/1£>/:2.012. and Sampling (if different) I L.;..~--=-/~~ _______ ---I
Well Purging Equip Used: rnJpump or [9] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 Gn.J.I'1Jfa..S
Purging Method Used: 002 casings [9]3 casings
Sampling Event I Q~ r--fe.-l.;l ;V:.J-.r ... +"e. Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I L-_-r_W_AJ_-_,_O_7 _____ ---I
pH Buffer 7.0 7-0 pH Buffer 4.0 11,0
Specific Conductance .... 1 _'1..:,.q..:,.q ___ ----I1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 12&70
Depth to Water Before Purging 1 '1~ J C:.t> Casing Volume (V) 4" well:I 53. bJ I <.653h)
3" Well: ..... _O~ __ --I.(.367h)
Conductance (avg) 10 \;t L--~~~ _____ ~ pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lL). bO Redox Potential (Eh)L-1 ;2.~1.:s __ --I TurbiditYL-1 -=b;..:;.2~_--I
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 AO~
Time Gal. Purged Time 1 I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance pH Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time Gal. Purged Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance pH Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
V olume of Water Purged gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 10 T = 2V/Q = I ICl.7;2.. I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
N arne of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs L-I "-lA"--'W'--=-"Ps:..=;L::..-____ ---I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 -0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients m 0 100 ml 0 {XI H2SO4 tJ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. D 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 1251 0 ~
C h\O\~JL If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth I ttS.?-.D Sample Time 1 1'111 ;2..
See instruction
Comment
TWN-65 10-15-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1-2 r····-········-··-·····-··-··---~. -_. __ ... __ . I ()ENISONl)j~ t MIN~S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GgOUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I qTh Q\AO..rte r N'+('a...+~ 2.01~
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Location (well name): L..1-r_w_N_-_7D~ _________ --I
Sampler Name
and initials: I =:t;t111e.' fJ {S 11 ,dOt ~ /rJl
Field Sample ID
Date and Time for Purging I lD/lb/;:2..01.2.. and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [][]pump or [QJ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Purging Method Used: 002 casings [QJ3 casings
Sampling Event I Qv..o-.ri=e1'")'j NA=r01e Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ..... _1i_W_v\J_-_1_J _____ --I
pH Buffer 7.0 '7.0· I pH Buffer 4.0 I 11,6
Specific Conductance ..... 1 _9_9_q ____ ....... 1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1.5.5.0D
Depth to Water Before Purging I GJ) I 8 D Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 Y 1 • .2.,b 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L..-___ --I
Conductance (avg) I L.. ...;..1 L_l...;.'1...:..4 ______ --' pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) Ilq I bLJ Redox Potential (Eh)1 3506 Turbidityla.....-" __ ---I
Weather Condo SVW\!!j Ext" Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) .... 1 ___ ...J
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pHI ...... __ ----'
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (m V) IL..-___ --'
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
Time Gal. Purged Time Gal. Purged
Conductance pH Conductance pH 1.-1 ___ --I
Temp.oC Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1.-1 ___ ---I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 6/06/2012 Rev. 7.2
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 60 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I 10 T=2V/Q= I Z.':S I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1)·9;
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated L..I _b_b __ ---'
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labs I I-_A_W_A_L _____ ----'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Added Type of Sample if other than as Preservative Type
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 D 3x40 ml D D HCL D D
Nutrients .~ 0 100 ml D D H2SO4 ~ D
Heavy Metals D D 250ml D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250ml D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha 0 D 1,000 ml D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) ·tJ D Sample volume D 'KJ D ~
Lh )oridc If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of Preservative:
Final Depth 115:::'. \ 5 Sample Time 070Y
Comment
~ See instruction
TWN-70 10-16-2012 IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2of2
TabC
Kriged Current Quarter Groundwater Contour Map and Depth to Water Summary
® estimated dry area
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing
.5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW04-12 temporary perched monitoring well
5577 showing elevation in feetamsl
TWN-10 .. . A.5586 temporary perched nitrate mOnltonng
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
tiiiI 5594 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-27 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5525 installed October, 2011 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING
~ 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
KRIGED 4th QUARTER, 2012 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H :/718000/feb 13/UwI1212. srf C-l
NAME: Garrin Palmer
DATE: 12/28/2012
TIME WELL Static level TIME WELL Static Level TIME WELL Static Level TIME WELL Static Level
824 MW-1 64.15 1251 MW-4 73.02 1341 PIEZ-1 61.55 NA DR-1 ABANDON
706 MW-2 109.75 1256 TW4-1 64.99 13.43 PIEZ-2 20.20 NA DR-2 ABANDON
701 MW-3 83.06 1249 TW4-2 66.90 1346 PIEZ-3 40.31
701 MW-3A 85.04 1245 TW4-3 50.29 1438 PIEZ-4 46.85
719 MW-5 106.27 1302 TW4-4 69.98 1441 PIEZ-5 41.95 910 DR-5 82.9
717 MW-11 87.54 1240 TW4-5 56.81 916 DR-6 94.4
721 MW-12 108.50 1307 TW4-6 70.04 1207 TWN-1 51.47 1500 DR-7 92
740 MW-14 103.52 1253 TW4-7 67.92 1210 TWN-2 20.93 925 DR-8 50.96
736 MW-15 106.35 1259 TW4-8 66.54 1214 TWN-3 32.76 922 DR-9 86.31
1445 MW-17 73.60 1243 TW4-9 54.75 1218 TWN-4 41.01 919 DR-10 78.12
827 MW-18 70.12 1236 TW4-10 56.37 838 TWN-5 69.28 1454 DR-ll 98.25
746 MW-19 55.01 1330 TW4-11 57.85 820 TWN-6 75.27 1451 DR-12 89.12
650 MW-20 89.95 1320 TW4-12 47.13 840 TWN-7 87.76 1448 DR-13 69.65
645 MW-22 66.71 1322 TW4-13 47.15 831 TWN-8 62.30 931 DR-14 76.27
723 MW-23 115.39 1325 TW4-14 86.89 752 TWN-9 62.21 959 DR-15 92.8
641 MW-24 114.18 1233 TW4-15 68.15 817 TWN-10 80.70 NA DR-16 ABANDON
714 MW-25 73.19 1333 TW4-16 60.25 811 TWN-11 69.25 934 DR-17 64.75
654 MW-26 59.93 1336 TW4-17 74.95 806 TWN-12 27.72 NA DR-18 ABANDON
705 MW-27 51.46 1201 TW4-18 56.63 755 TWN-13 45.61 937 DR-19 63.05
639 MW-28 76.28 1400 TW4-19 63.18 758 TWN-14 62.20 946 DR-20 55.35
708 MW-29 101.82 1231 TW4-20 56.95 814 TWN-15 91.74 1002 DR-21 107.35
710 MW-30 75.51 1204 TW4-21 54.10 803 TWN-16 47.60 939 DR-22 DRY
712 MW-31 67.49 1228 TW4-22 53.41 801 TWN-17 33.47 951 DR-23 70.46
658 MW-32 74.95 1310 TW4-23 64.76 836 TWN-18 57.95 942 DR-24 43.54
728 MW-33 DRY 1225 TW4-24 54.78 858 TWN-19 52.50 NA DR-25 ABANDON
731 MW-34 107.95 1157 TW4-25 47.50
725 MW-35 112.36 1314 TW4-26 63.48
727 MW-36 110.51 1328 TW4-27 83.08
734 MW-37 110.17
TabD
Kriged Previous Quarter Groundwater Contour Map
@ estimated dry area
M.W-5 perched monitoring well showing
5503 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-12 temporary perched monitoring well
0 5583 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN-10 A.5586 temporary perched nitrate monitoring
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
Q 5593 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-27 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5526 installed October, 2011 showing
elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19, and TW4-20 are pumping wells
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2012 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H :/718000/nov121UwI0912.srf D-l
TabE
Hydrographs of Groundwater Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
.-.. c.
E
.Q .... ...... "-"
(1)
E
i=
~
(1) > 0
CD > (1)
..J
~ (1) ... ~ ,....
I Z 3: ....
8 ~/90/g0 -r---,----r------,.----r----..,..---,----,.----,-------,
G ~/B ~/O ~
G~HOlvO
~ ~/v~/60
~ ~/9G/GO
o ~/O ~/BO
o ~/GG/~O
60/90lLO
BO/B ~/G~
BO/~0/90 +---+----+-----1---+----+----+----+----+-----1
o o L{) T""" L{)
o C\i L{)
o
ct)
L{)
o ...f L{)
I\)
(}1 o
I\) o o
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
(}1 o o o (}1 o o o
1-------+------+-----+-------+------+1 06/01/08
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
'-------'--------'-------'--------1.--------1-' 05/06/13
-4
== Z I I\)
~ r+ (I)
~
r (I) < (I)
0 < (I)
~
=t
3
(I) .-. ...... :-+
C'"
3
"C ---
~ c.
E
.c
~ "I----(1)
E
i=
110..
(1) > 0
(1) > (1)
..J
110..
(1) ..... CO 3:
M I Z ~
£ ~/90190 -.------.,---__._--_~--_r_--__,__--__._--_--____.
G ~/B ~/O ~
G~HOlvO
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/9G/GO
o ~/O ~/BO
o ~/GG/~O
60/90lLO
BO/B ~/G ~
BO/~0/90 +----+----+----+----+----+----+---+---~
to o C')
.-. c.
E
.c
...; ,.....
'-"
(1)
E
i=
:t... (1) > 0
(1) > (1)
..J
:t...
(1) ... ~
~ I
Z
3: ~
£ ~/90/90
G~HO/vO
~ ~/v~/60
~ ~/9G/GO
o ~/O ~/BO
o ~/GG/~O
60/90/LO
BO/B ~/G ~
BO/~0/90
o c:i o c:i o ..n o
c:i C\J
o ..n C\J
o
c:i C')
q
l{)
C')
~~
H
~
~
~~ •
~~
~ ~
~
j •
~
o c:i ">t
o c:i l{)
.-.. Q.
E
.c
..: ,.... ---(1)
E
i=
~ (1) > 0
(1) > (1)
...J
~
(1) ... ~
Lt')
I
Z
3: ~
8 ~/90/90 -r----r-------r----.,----..,..----r---,.---r-----,---.....,
G~/8 ~/O ~
G ~/~0/170
~ ~/17 ~/60
~ ~/9G/GO
o ~/O ~/80
o ~/GG/~O
60/90/LO
80/8 ~/G ~ +---f-----f---+---!----+---+------1r-----+----l
C\J
0)
CD
CD
0)
CD
ex:>
0)
CD
o o
"""
ex:> o
"""
o
8 ~/90/90 -r-------r-----r------r-----r----...,.--'---,.----,
G~/B ~/O ~
G~HOlvO
.-.. a.
E
.c
..; ~ ~/v~/60 ,..... ---CI)
E
i=
I.. .
CI) > 0 ~ ~/9G/GO
CI) > CI)
...J
I.. CI) .. CO o ~/O ~/BO
== «> I Z
== t-
O ~/GG/~O
60/90lLO
BO/B ~/G ~ +----1-----+-----1------1-----4-----1----1
.-.. C.
E
.c .... .... ---CI)
E
i=
I.. CI) > 0
CI) > Go)
..J
I..
CI) ... ~
....... I Z 3: I-
£ ~/90190
G ~/B ~/O ~
G ~/~OlvO
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/9G/GO
o ~/O ~/BO
o ~/GG/~O
60/90lLO
BO/B ~/G ~
o ~ co
1
~
~~
o
cO co
~
~
~
1\
(
•
\
>
\
q
co m
~ ...
o ~ m
o
cO m
0> (J1 o
~--
~
~~
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
0> o o
(J1
(J1 o
(J1 o o
---------~
,.J:::.
(J1 o
, ---------
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~~
~~
~~
~
,.J:::. o o
12/18/08
07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
05/06/13
-I :e z I co
~ r+ (1) ..,
r-(1) < (1)
0 < (1) ..,
::!
3 (1) ..-.. ...... ~
C'"
3
"'C ---
.-.. c.
E
.c
..: ,..... ---C1)
E
i=
I-C1) > 0
G) > C1)
...J
I-
C1) ... ~
0')
I
Z
3: t-
£ ~/90/90 -r------r------r-----,....-----,----...,..-------r-----.
G~/~O/vO
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/9G/GO
o ~/O ~/80
O ~/GG/~O
60/90/LO
80/8 ~/G ~ +-----i-----+----+-----i-----i------1I-------l
o
0)
L!)
o o co
q
C\J co
o
C"5 co
o
.¢ co
q
L!) co
o
<0 co
.-..
C.
E
.c
..: 't----CI)
E
~
lIo..
CI) > 0
CI) > CI)
..J
lIo.. CI) .... ~
0 ,....
I
Z ;:
~
£ ~/90/90 -r-------.,------,..---------:r----------,-------.
G ~/~OlvO
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/9G/GO
o ~/O ~/80
o ~/GG/~O
60/90/LO
80/8 ~/G ~ +-----+-----+------of-----f--------I
L()
c:i OJ
o
cr)
OJ
-.....J I\) o :1
0,
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
-.....J -" o r
-.....J o
0,
-.....J o o
0> co
0,
0> co o
1------+------1-----1------+-----+------1-1 07/06/09
'01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26111
09/14/11
04/01/12
10/18/12
'----___ -"--___ --"-____ "-___ -"--____ --.1.. ____ ---'-05/06/13
-I :e
Z I ..... ..... :e m ....
CD -.:
r CD < CD
0 < CD -.:
::!
3
CD .-.. ..... :+
C'"
3
"C ---
...-... C.
E
.c .... 'I----CI)
E
i=
~
CI) > 0
CI) > CI)
..J
~ CI) ... ~
N ,....
I
Z
== I-
8~/90/90
G~/8 ~/O ~
G ~HO/vO
~ ~/v~/60
~ ~/9G/GO
o ~/O ~/80
O~/GG/~O
60/90/LO
o o o
Lri
o o o Lri o o
C\I
o Lri
C\I
~
•
~~
~ .
\
~
o o Ct')
~
~
~
o Lri Ct')
~~
o o v
£~/90/90
G~/8 ~/O ~ 1\
I\r
.-.. G~/~O/vO 0 C.
E
.c
..: ~ "-'"
CD '" E
i= ~ ~/v~/60
:to..
CD > 1\
0
CD > CD ..J
:to.. ~ ~/9G/GO CD ... ~
('I)
T"'"
I
Z
3r: I-o ~/O ~/80
\ ~ '-. ~ ~ /
o ~/GG/~O
<
'" ~ ~
6 0/90/L 0
..-.. C.
E
.c ... ,....
"-"
Q)
E
i=
~ Q) > 0
Q) > Q)
...I
~
Q) ... CO 3:
~ ,...
I Z 3: t-
8 ~/90/S0 -r---.....,------,---_r----..,..---.....,------r---_r-------.
G~/8 ~/O ~
G~/~O/vO
~ ~/v~/60
~ ~/9G/GO
O ~/O ~/80
O~/GG/~O
60/90/LO +----+----+---1----+----+----+---1-----1
q
C\J co
C'! C\J co
co
N co
~ C\J co
o M co
C\J M co
co M co
.-.. C.
E
.c
..;
~ ---CI>
E
i=
~
CI> > 0
CI> > CI> ...J
~
CI> ... ~
Lt) ,....
I Z
== I-
8~/90/90
G~HO/vO
~ ~/v~/60
~ ~/9G/GO
o ~/O ~/80
O~/GG/~O
60/90/LO
o o <X>
o C\i <X>
.....
o .¢
<X>
o <ci <X>
o cO <X>
o o (j)
,
H
~~
~
I ~~
.
I ~
q
C\J (j)
t
I
~
H
~
£~/90/S0
G ~/8 ~/O ~ '~
~~
.-... G~HO/vO • C.
E V .c ....
'1-0 ---C1)
E
i= ~ ~/v~/60
~ C1) > 0
CD > C1)
...J
~ ~ ~/9G/GO C1) ...
~
1\ 1\
"" > ~
co ·
T""" I \
Z 3: ~
t-O ~/O ~/80
o ~/GG/~O
~~
~ ~ ~ 1"+
60/90/LO
( /
w (j)
"
W 01 c.n
Depth Below Measuring Point (ft.)
W 01
"
w ~ c.n
w ~
"
w w c.n
w w
" I------+------I-----I------t-----t------t' 07/06/09
01/22/10
08/10/10
02/26/11
09/14/1 1
. 04/01/12
10/18/12
L...--__ ....I.-___ --I.. ____ I--___ -I-___ --J.. ___ ---L, 05/06/13
-I =e
Z
I ......
........
~ r+ CD ..,
r-CD < CD
0 < CD ..,
::t
3
CD ..-.. ...... :-+
C'"
3
"'C ---
.-.. Q.
E
.c
....: .... ---CI)
E
i=
J..
CI) > 0
Gi > CI)
...J
J..
CI) ... ~
co ,...
I Z
== ....
£~/90/S0
G~/~O/vO
~ ~/v~/60
~ ~/9G/GO
o ~/0~/90
O~/GG/~O
60/90/LO
o c:i o c:i
T"""
~
I 0
c:i C')
~
~
~
~
~ ~~
«::: ~ ~~
o
c:i -::t
~
~
V~
t----.
o
c:i I.!)
o c:i <0
o c:i I'--
..-.. C.
E
.c ..... ,....
"-'"
Q)
E
i=
~ Q) > 0
G) > Q)
...J
~
Q) ..... co 3:
en ,....
I Z 3: I-
£ ~/90/S0 --r--------r-----r-----,....-----,-----,--------r---....,
G ~/B ~/O ~
G ~/~O/vO
~ ~/v ~/60
~ ~/9G/GO
o ~/O ~/BO
60/90/LO -I-----+----l-----i-----+----+----l-----I
o C\i lO
~ C\J lO
o (t)
lO
lO (t)
lO
o ..,f-
lO
lO ..,f-
lO
q
lO lO
~ lO lO
TabF
Depths to Groundwater and Elevations Over Time for Nitrate Monitoring Wells
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-l
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,646.96 5,648.09 1.13 112.5
5,600.38 02/06/09 47.71 46.58
5,599.99 07/21/09 48.10 46.97
5,600.26 09/21/09 47.83 46.70
5,601.10 10/28/09 46.99 45.86
5,602.59 12114/09 45.50 44.37
5,600.55 03111/10 47.54 46.41
5,600.66 05/11/10 47.43 46.30
5,599.18 09/29/10 48.91 47.78
5,598.92 12/21110 49.17 48.04
5,598.29 02/28/11 49.80 48.67
5,597.80 06/21111 50.29 49.16
5,597.32 09/20/11 50.77 49.64
5,597.15 12/21111 50.94 49.81
5,596.54 03/27112 51.55 50.42
5,596.52 06/28/12 51 .57 50.44
5,595.03 09/27112 53.06 51.93
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-2
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (M'P) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,625.75 5,626.69 0.94 95
5,611.37 02/06/09 15.32 14.38
5,610.63 07121109 16.06 15.12
5,609.73 09121109 16.96 16.02
5,607.08 11102/09 19.61 18.67
5,606.57 12/14/09 20.12 19.18
5,612.45 03/11110 14.24 13.30
5,612.78 05/11110 13.91 12.97
5,611.37 09129110 15.32 14.38
5,610.24 12121110 16.45 15.51
5,610.64 02128111 16.05 15.11
5,609.78 06121111 16.91 15.97
5609.79 09120/11 16.90 15.96
5609.72 12121111 16.97 16.03
5,605.69 03127112 21.00 20.06
5,605.67 06128112 21.02 20.08
5,603.03 09127112 23.66 22.72
5,605.76 12128112 20.93 19.99
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-3
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,633.64 5,634.50 0.86 110
5,603.77 02/06/09 30.73 29.87
5,602.37 07/21/09 32.13 31.27
5,602.34 09/21/09 32.16 31.30
5,602.60 10/28/09 31.90 31.04
5,603.12 12114/09 31.38 30.52
5,602.90 03111/10 31.60 30.74
5,603.23 05111/10 31.27 30.41
5,602.86 09/29/10 31.64 30.78
5,603.35 12/21/10 31.15 30.29
5,602.89 02/28111 31.61 30.75
5,602.75 06/21111 31.75 30.89
5,602.40 09/20111 32.10 31.24
5,602.40 12/21111 32.10 31.24
5,601.70 03/27112 32.80 31.94
5,601.67 06/28/12 32.83 31.97
5,600.50 09/27/12 34.00 33.14
5,601.74 12/28/12 32.76 31.90
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-4
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,641.04 5,641.87 0.83 136
5,601.47 02/06/09 40.40 39.57
5,604.26 07/21/09 37.61 36.78
5,605.02 09/21/09 36.85 36.02
5,605.87 10/28/09 36.00 35.17
5,605.81 12114/09 36.06 35.23
5,605.31 03/11110 36.56 35.73
5,605.36 05111/10 36.51 35.68
5,604.59 09/29110 37.28 36.45
5,604.42 12/21110 37.45 36.62
5,603.69 02/28111 38.18 37.35
5,603.36 06/21111 38.51 37.68
5,602.82 09/20/11 39.05 38.22
5,602.79 12/21111 39.08 38.25
5,600.82 03/27/12 41.05 40.22
5,600.84 06/28112 41.03 40.20
5,598.47 09/27112 43.40 42.57
5,600.86 12/28112 41.01 40.18
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-5
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,653.70 5,655.18 1.48 155
5,584.43 08/25/09 70.75 69.27
5,584.51 09/21/09 70.67 69.19
5,584.54 11110/09 70.64 69.16
5,584.62 12114/09 70.56 69.08
5,584.97 03/11110 70.21 68.73
5,585.38 05111110 69.80 68.32
5,585.35 09/29110 69.83 68.35
5,585.42 12/21110 69.76 68.28
5,585.08 02/28/11 70.10 68.62
5,585.38 06/21111 69.80 68.32
5,585.51 09/20/11 69.67 68.19
5,585.76 12/21111 69.42 67.94
5,585.61 03/27112 69.57 68.09
5,585.63 06/28112 69.55 68.07
5,585.63 09/27112 69.55 68.07
5,585.90 12/28112 69.28 67.80
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-6
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,663.03 5,664.94 1.91 135
5,589.52 08/25/09 75.42 73.51
5,589.46 09/22/09 75.48 73.57
5,589.61 11/03/09 75.33 73.42
5,589.92 12/14/09 75.02 73.11
5,590.24 03111110 74.70 72.79
5,590.40 05/11110 74.54 72.63
5,590.24 09/29110 74.70 72.79
5,590.49 12~21110 74.45 72.54
5,590.16 02/28/11 74.78 72.87
5,590.44 06/21/11 74.50 72.59
5,590.35 09/20111 74.59 72.68
5,590.67 12/21111 74.27 72.36
5,590.34 03/27112 74.60 72.69
5,590.32 06/28/12 74.62 72.71
5,589.77 09/27/12 75.17 73.26
5,589.67 12/28112 75.27 73.36
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-7
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.39 5,649.26 1.87 120
5,552.56 08/25/09 96.70 94.83
5,558.34 09/21/09 90.92 89.05
5,558.82 11/10/09 90.44 88.57
5,558.96 12114/09 90.30 88.43
5,559.54 03111/10 89.72 87.85
5,559.60 05/11110 89.66 87.79
5,559.83 09/29110 89.43 87.56
5,559.00 12/21110 90.26 88.39
5,559.68 02/28111 89.58 87.71
5,560.43 06/21111 88.83 86.96
5,560.46 09/20111 88.80 86.93
5,560.78 12/21111 88.48 86.61
5,560.92 03/27112 88.34 86.47
5,560.87 06/28/12 88.39 86.52
5,561.40 09/27112 87.86 85.99
5,561.50 12/28112 87.76 85.89
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-8
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,649.35 5,651.48 2.13 160
5,589.01 08/25/09 62.47 60.34
5,589.10 09/21109 62.38 60.25
5,589.09 11103/09 62.39 60.26
5,603.38 12114/09 48.10 45.97
5,589.68 03111110 61.80 59.67
5,589.95 05111110 61.53 59.40
5,589.74 09129110 61.74 59.61
5,589.97 12121110 61.51 59.38
5,589.67 02128111 61.81 59.68
5,589.96 06121111 61.52 59.39
5,589.82 09120111 61.66 59.53
5,590.18 12/21111 61.30 59.17
5,589.85 03127112 61.63 59.50
5,589.84 06128/12 61.64 59.51
5,589.28 09127/12 62.20 60.07
5,589.18 12128/12 62.30 60.17
Water Levels and Data over Tilne
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-9
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,645.68 5,647.45 1.77 102.5
5,582.05 08/25/09 65.40 63.63
5,582.12 09/22/09 65.33 63.56
5,582.27 11110/09 65.18 63.41
5,582.53 12114/09 64.92 63.15
5,582.92 03111/10 64.53 62.76
5,583.06 05/11110 64.39 62.62
5,583.25 09/29110 64.20 62.43
5,583.57 12/21110 63.88 62.11
5,583.54 02/28111 63.91 62.14
5,583.92 06/21/11 63.53 61.76
5,584.04 09/20/11 63.41 61.64
5,587.42 12/21111 60.03 58.26
5,584.56 03/27112 62.89 61.12
5,584.55 06/28112 62.90 61.13
5,584.85 09/27112 62.6 60.83
5,585.24 12/28112 62.21 60.44
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -10
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,664.63 5,666.98 2.35 107.5
5,584.18 08/25/09 82.80 80.45
5,584.40 09/22/09 82.58 80.23
5,584.61 11110/09 82.37 80.02
5,584.90 12114/09 82.08 79.73
5,585.21 03111110 81.77 79.42
5,585.42 05111110 81.56 79.21
5,585A2 09/29110 81.56 79.21
5,585.68 12/21110 81.30 78.95
5,585.60 02/28/11 81.38 79.03
5,585.95 06/21111 81.03 78.68
5,585.92 09/20111 81.06 78.71
5,586.22 12/21111 80.76 78.41
5,586.16 03/27112 80.82 78.47
5,586.16 06/28112 80.82 78.47
5,586.13 09/27/12 80.85 78.50
5,586.28 12/28112 80.7 78.35
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-ll
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,683.16 5,684.53 1.37 147.5
5,613.00 11103/09 71.53 70.16
5,613.88 12/14/09 70.65 69.28
5,614.65 03/11/10 69.88 68.51
5,615.16 05/11/10 69.37 68.00
5,614.93 09/29/10 69.60 68.23
5,615.09 12/21110 69.44 68.07
5,614.96 02/28/11 69.57 68.20
5,615.12 06/21/11 69.41 68.04
5,614.96 09/20/11 69.57 68.20
5,615.18 12/21/11 69.35 67.98
5,615.11 03/27/12 69.42 ' 68.05
5,615.12 06/28/12 69.41 68.04
5,615.03 09/27/12 69.50 68.13
5,615.28 12/28/12 69.25 67.88
(
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-12
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,667.03 5,668.24 1.21 115
5,628.33 11103/09 39.91 38.70
5,628.86 12114/09 39.38 38.17
5,630.27 03111110 37.97 36.76
5,631.64 05111110 36.60 35.39
5,633.73 09129/10 34.51 33.30
5,633.43 12121110 34.81 33.60
5,634.35 02/28/11 33.89 32.68
5,635.95 06121111 32.29 31.08
5,636.44 09120/11 31.80 30.59
5,638.93 12121111 29.31 28.10
5,639.69 03127/12 28.55 27.34
5,639.74 06128112 28.50 27.29
5,640.90 09127112 27.34 26.13
5,640.52 12128112 27.72 26.51
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -13
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,633.04 5,634.32 1.28 120
5,586.95 11103/09 47.37 46.09
5,587.22 12/14/09 47.10 45.82
5,587.45 03/11110 46.87 45.59
5,587.64 05111110 46.68 45.40
5,587.37 09/29110 46.95 45.67
5,587.77 12/21110 46.55 45.27
5,587.64 02/28111 46.68 45.40
5,587.89 06/21111 46.43 45.15
5,588.03 09/20111 46.29 45.01
5,588.30 12/21/11 46.02 44.74
5,588.32 03/27/12 46.00 44.72
5,588.30 06/28/12 46.02 44.74
5,588.51 09/27112 45.81 44.53
5,588.71 12/28112 45.61 44.33
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-14
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,647.80 5,649.53 1.73 135
5,586.18 11104/09 63.35 61.62
5,586.51 12114/09 63.02 61.29
5,586.71 03/11110 62.82 61.09
5,586.72 05111110 62.81 61.08
5,586.53 09/29/10 63.00 61.27
5,586.80 12/21110 62.73 61.00
5,586.74 02/28111 62.79 61.06
5,586.84 06/21111 62.69 60.96
5,586.73 09/20111 62.80 61.07
5,586.98 12121111 62.55 60.82
5,587.07 03/27112 62.46 60.73
5,587.10 06/28112 62.43 60.70
5,587.07 09/27112 62.46 60.73
5,587.33 12/28/12 62.20 60.47
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -15
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,675.01 5,676.49 1.48 155
5,594.12 11110/09 82.37 80.89
5,584.03 12114/09 92.46 90.98
5,584.10 03111110 92.39 90.91
5,584.16 05111/10 92.33 90.85
5,584.26 09/29110 92.23 90.75
5,584.30 12/21110 92.19 90.71
5,584.04 02/28/11 92.45 90.97
5,584.30 06/21111 92.19 90.71
5,584.37 09/20/11 92.12 90.64
5,584.49 12/21/11 92.00 90.52
5,584.47 03/27/12 92.02 90.54
5,584.49 . 06/28112 92.00 90.52
5,584.58 09/27112 91.91 90.43
5,584.75 12/28112 91.74 90.26
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-16
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,651.07 5,652.70 1.63 100
5,603.34 11104/09 49.36 47.73
5,603.56 12/14/09 49.14 47.51
5,603.84 03/11110 48.86 47.23
5,604.31 05111110 48.39 46.76
5,604.28 09/29110 48.42 46.79
5,604.39 12/21110 48.31 46.68
5,604.20 02/28111 48.50 46.87
5,604.55 06/21/11 48.15 46.52
5,604.74 09/20111 47.96 46.33
5,604.94 12/21/11 47.76 46.13
5,604.84 03/27112 47.86 46.23
5,604.85 06/28/12 47.85 46.22
5,604.99 09/27112 47.71 46.08
5,605.10 12/28112 47.60 45.97
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill-Well TWN-17
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,639.73 5,641.55 1.82 100
5,605.96 11104/09 35.59 33.77
5,606.27 12114/09 35.28 33.46
5,606.25 03/11110 35.30 33.48
5,606.55 05/11110 35.00 33.18
5,606.77 09/29110 34.78 32.96
5,607.15 12/21110 34.40 32.58
5,606.96 02/28/11 34.59 32.77
5,607.22 06/21111 34.33 32.51
5,607.40 09/20111 34.15 32.33
5,607.85 12/21111 33.70 31.88
5,607.67 03/27/12 33.88 32.06
5,607.68 06/28112 33.87 32.05
5,607.76 09/27112 33.79 31.97
5,608.08 12/28112 33.47 31.65
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -18
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,643.95 5,645.45 1.50 100
5,586.85 11102/09 58.60 57.10
5,600.14 12114/09 45.31 43.81
5,587.36 03111/10 58.09 56.59
5,587.71 05111/10 57.74 56.24
5,587.50 09/29110 57.95 56.45
5,607.66 12/21110 37.79 36.29
5,587.35 02/28111 58.10 56.60
5,587.71 06/21111 57.74 56.24
5,587.65 09/20111 57.80 56.30
5,587.95 12/21111 57.50 56.00
5,587.05 03/27/12 58.40 56.90
5,587.05 06/28112 58.40 56.90
5,587.50 09/27112 57.95 56.45
5,587.50 12/28112 57.95 56.45
Water Levels and Data over Time
White Mesa Mill -Well TWN -19
Total or
Measuring Measured Total
Water Land Point Depth to Depth to Total
Elevation Surface Elevation Length Of Date Of Water Water Depth Of
(WL) (LSD) (MP) Riser (L) Monitoring (blw.MP) (blw.LSD) Well
5,659.59 5,661.36 1.77 110
5,606.17 11102/09 55.19 53.42
5,606.70 12/14/09 54.66 52.89
5,607.22 03/11/10 54.14 52.37
5,607.89 05111/10 53.47 51.70
5,607.98 09129110 53.38 51.61
5,608.41 12121110 52.95 51.18
5,608.49 02/28111 52.87 51.10
5,608.60 06121111 52.76 50.99
5,609.17 09120/11 52.19 50.42
5,608.90 12121111 52.46 50.69
5,608.87 03127/12 52.49 50.72
5,608.86 06128112 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 09127/12 52.50 50.73
5,608.86 12128112 52.50 50.73
TabG
Laboratory Analytical Reports
American West
ANA l.YTlCAL l A BORATOR IES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
;:-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
1210325-022
Client Sample ID: Piez-01_10172012
Collection Date: 10117/2012 0833h
Received Date: 10119/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mglL
NitratelNitrite (as N) mglL
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
1012512012 1345h E300.0 10.0
10126/2012 2154h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
55.0
7.66
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 26 of36
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached cae. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale .of any product or pro~ess, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTIC AL LABO RATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone] .
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
1210325-023
Client Sample ID: Piez-02_10172012
Collection Date: 10/17/2012 0809h
Received Date: 10/19/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Gaffin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
10125/2012 0637h E300.0 1.00
10/2612012 2214h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
9.50
0.192
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 27 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached CDC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of tbe name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection 'A'ith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
A N A LY T ICA L LABORATO R IES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-024
Client Sample ID: Piez-03_10172012
Collection Date: 10/17/2012 0821h
Received Date: 1011912012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
10125/2012 1406h E300.0 10.0
10/2612012 2204h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
20.1
2.75
Report Date: 111212012 Page 28 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive lise of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this com~any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re:publication of t~is report for any
American West ANA Ly r rCAL l.A BORA TORIE S
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-005
Client Sample ID: TWN-01_10152012
Collection Date: 10115/2012 1150h
Received Date: 10119/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
1012612012 0230h E300.0 10.0
10/2412012 2119h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
17.5
0.432
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 9 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this comjJany or any. member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro. cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANA.LYT1CAL I.AI3 0RATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-020
Client Sample ID: TWN-02_10172012
Collection Date: 10/1712012 0755h
Received Date: 10/19/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
10/2512012 1323h E300.0 10.0
10126/2012 2211h E353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
79.0
22.1
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 24 of36
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SOW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use oftbe addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staft; or reproduction of this, ~eport in. connection v:ith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project:. 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-019
Client Sample ID: TWN-03_10172012
Collection Date: 10/1712012 0747h
Received Date: 10/1912012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mglL
NitratelNitrite (as N) mglL
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
10/29/2012 2106h E300.0 100
1012612012 2209h E353.2 10.0
Analytical
Result Qual
149
12.1
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 23 of36
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use ofthe addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useofthe name of this com])any or any member of its start: or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection v:ith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-008
Client Sample ID: TWN-04_10152012
Collection Date: 10115/2012 1442h
Received Date: 10/19/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mglL 1012612012 0312h E300.0 10.0 26.4
NitratelNitrite (as N) mglL 10/31/2012 1741h E353.2 0.100 1.45
/\ -Reissue of a previously generated report. Iriformation has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
/\
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 12 of36
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useoft~e name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection ~ith the adverti~ement, promotion or sale of any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication oft~is report for any
American West
A NALYTI C A L L ABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOffic'er
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-004
Client Sample ID: TWN-05_10152012
Collection Date: 10/1512012 1045h
Received Date: 10/19/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mgIL
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
1012612012 0208h E300.0 10.0
10124/2012 2118h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
43.5
< 0.100
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 8 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useof the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West ANALYTICA L LAaOflATORI ~S
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-009
Client Sample ID: TWN-06_10152012
Collection Date: 10/15/2012 1517h
Received Date: 10/19/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mgIL
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
10126/2012 0333h E300.0 10.0
10124/2012 2124h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
20.4
0.786
Report Date: 11/2/2012 Page 13 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent, use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-007
Client Sample ID: TWN-07 _10162012
Collection Date: 10/16/2012 0645h
Received Date: 10/19/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
1012412012 2021h E300.0 1.00
1012412012 2122h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
5.67
0.641
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 11 of36
All analyses applicable to. the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfnnned in accnrdance to. NELAC protncnls. Pertinent sampling infnnnatinn is lncated nn the attached COe. This repnrt is provided fnr the exclusive use nfthe addressee. Privileges nf
subsequent use.nfthe name nfthis cnmpany nr anymember nfits staff, nr reprnductinn nfthis repnrt in. connectinn v.:ith the advertisement, pro.mntinn nr sale.of any product nr process, nrin cnnnectinn with the re.-publicatinn nfthis repnrt fnr any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-rnail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-001
Client Sample ID: TWN-08_10152012
Collection Date: 1011512012 0903h
Received Date: 10/19/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit
Chloride mg/L 1012412012 1544h E300.0 1.00
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 10124/2012 2107h E353.2 0.100
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
@ -High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference.
Analytical
Result Qual
11.1
< 0.100 l@
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 5 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent useofthe name of this comjJany or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale of any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANA LYTI CAL LABORATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-002
Client Sample ID: TWN-08R_10152012
Collection Date: 10/15/2012 0834h
Received Date: 10/19/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
10/24/2012 1835h E300.0 1.00
1012412012 2115h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
< 1.00
< 0.100
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 6 of36
ALI analyses applicable to. the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in acco.rdance to. NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is lo.cated on the attached CDC. This report is provided fo.r the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name o.fthis co.mpany or anymember of its staff, o.r reproductio.n of this report in. c?nnectio.n v:ith the advertisement, promotio.n o.r sale .o.fany product o.r process, o.rin co.nnectio.n with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
Al>tALY TICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-018
Client Sample ID: TWN-09 _10172012
Collection Date: 10117/2012 0734h
Received Date: 1011912012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mgIL
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
10/29/2012 2044h E300.0 100
10/26/2012 2149h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
194
12.5
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 22 of36
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SOW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any. member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection \'oIith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the rc.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTI CAL LAB ORATORI ·S
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-006
Client Sample ID: TWN-10_10162012
Collection Date: 1011612012 0633h
Received Date: 10119/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
1012612012 0251h E300.0 10.0
1012412012 2120h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
30.8
0.119
Report Date: 11/2/2012 Page 10 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SOW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this com~any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 W'est 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-011
Client Sample ID: TWN-11_10162012
Collection Date: 10116/2012 0823h
Received Date: 10119/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
1012612012 0458h E300.0 10.0
1012612012 2131h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
76.4
1.84
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 15 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SOW A, and RCRA are perfOimed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e name of this company or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West A NALYTICAl. LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-021
Client Sample ID: TWN-11R_10162012
Collection Date: 1011612012 0756h
Received Date: 10/1912012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
1012512012 0512h E300.0 1.00
~
10126/2012 2212h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
< 1.00
< 0.100
Report Date: 11/2/2012 Page 25 of36
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ~ith the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re.-publication ?f this report for any
American West
A NAtYTI CA L LABORAT OR I ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-010
Client Sample ID: TWN-12_10162012
Collection Date: 10/16/2012 0732h
Received Date: 10119/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
10126/2012 0437h E300.0 10.0
10126/2012 2130h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
101
1.41
Report Date: 11/2/2012 Page 14 of36
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this comp'any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection \\,ith the advertisement, promotion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTI C AL LAB ORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-003
Client Sample ID: TWN-13_10152012
Collection Date: 10115/2012 0953h
Receiyed Date: 1011912012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
10/2612012 0105h E300.0 10.0
1012412012 2116h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual '
47.3
< 0.100
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 7 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perforn1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use oft~e name of this comp'any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
::-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-015
Cifent Sample ID: TWN-14_10172012
Collection Date: 1011712012 0715h
Received Date: 1011912012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
1012612012 0706h E300.0 10.0
1012612012 2138h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
27.4
4.03
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 19 of36
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SOW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. connection ""ith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West ANALYTI CA L LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
:!-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-012
Client Sample ID: TWN-15_10172012
Collection Date: 10117/2012 0704h
Received Date: 10119/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mglL
NitratelNitrite (as N) mglL
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
10/26/2012 0520h E300.0 10.0
10/26/2012 2134h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
47.0
1.79
Report Date: 11/2/2012 Page 16 of36
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ,,:,ith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro. cess, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANA LYTICAL LABORA TO RIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, ut 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-014
Client Sample ID: TWN-16_10162012
Collection Date: 1011612012 1016h
Received Date: 10/19/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
1012612012 0645h E300.0 10.0
10126/2012 2136h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
32.1
2.50
Report Date: 11/2/2012 Page 18 of36
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCO This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. oft~e name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection \\lith the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or pro~ess, orin connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
A N ALYTIC A l. LABO RATO RIES
463 WestJ600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jo'se Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-017
Client Sample ID: TWN-17_10172012
Collection Date: 10117/2012 0725h
Received Date: 10/19/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared,
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
10/26/2012 0748h E300.0 10.0
10126/2012 2147h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
84.8
9.65
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 21 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee, Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in, c?nnection v:ith the advertisement, pro,motion or sale ,of any product or pro~ess, orin connection with the re,-publication ofthisreport for any
American West ANA LVTICA L LABORATO RI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-rnail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-013
Client Sample ID: TWN-18_10162012
Collection Date: 10/16/2012 0939h
Received Date: 10/19/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
1012612012 0623h E300.0 10.0
10/2612012 2135h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
67.5
1.95
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 17 of36
AJI analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of the n~me of this comr.any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro~ess, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANAl-YTlCAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-016
Client Sample ID: TWN-19_10162012
Collection Date: 10116/2012 1224h
Received Date: 10119/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
10/26/2012 0727h E300.0 10.0
10/26/2012 2146h E353.2 1.00
Analytical
Result Qual
118
7.70
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 20 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of t~e name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection ",:,ith the adverti~ement, promotion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of t~is report for any
American West ANALY TICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-025
Client Sample ID: TWN-60_10172012
Collection Date: 10117/2012 0910h
Received Date: 10119/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date
Compound Units Prepared
Chloride mg/L
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Method Reporting
Analyzed Used Limit
10/25/2012 onOh E300.0 1.00
10/26/2012 2222h E353.2 0.100
Analytical
Result Qual
< 1.00
< 0.100
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 29 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive lise of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. oft~e name of this company or any member of its staff; or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, promotion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICAL LAB ORATORI ES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-026
Client Sample ID: TWN-65_10152012
Collection Date: 10115/2012 1442h
Received Date: 10/19/2012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 10/25/2012 1427h E300.0 10.0 25.6
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 10/3112012 1744h E353.2 0.100 1.45
/\ -Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated,· or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the
previously issued reports.
/\
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 30 of36
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use. of t~e name of this comp'any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale of any product or process, orin connection with the re.-publication of this repOlt for any
American West ANA LYTICA L L ABORATO RIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-rnail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Sample ID: 1210325-027
Client Sample ID: TWN-70_10172012
Collection Date: 10/17/2012 0704h
Received Date: 1011912012 1140h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
Chloride mg/L 10125/2012 1448h E300.0 10.0 44.4
NitratelNitrite (as N) mg/L 10126/2012 2208h E353.2 1.00 2.00
Report Date: 11/2/2012 Page 31 of36
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent lise. of the name of this com~any or any member of its staff? or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of t?is report for any
American West ANA LYTICAL LAB ORATOR IES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Dear GarrinPalmer: Lab Set ill: 1210325
American West Analytical Laboratories received 27 sample(s) on 10/19/2012 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Association Conference (NELAC) Institute in Utah and Texas;
and is state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri. In addition,
A W AL is also accredited by the American Analytical Laboratory Association (A2LA) on
ISO IEC 17025:2005, Department of Defense (DOD), UST for the State of Wyoming, and
the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). All analyses were
performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute andlor A2LA protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or ·
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
This is a revision to a report originally issued 10/30/2012. Pages 1, 12, 30, and 33-36 have
been revised. Page 32 has been added. All pages have been updated for pagination.
Thank You, Ky I e F. Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
ON: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL-Laboratory Director,
G email=[e-mail]. c=US ross Date:2012.11.0216:13:19-06'OO'
Approved by: ~ ______ ~ ______________ ~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 1 OfJ/
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privy/
subsequent use. of the name of this comp'any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report ill. c?nnection with the adverti~ement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or pro.cess, orin connection with the re.-publication of this repotY
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANALYTI CAL LABORATORI ES Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Lab Set ID: 1210325
Date Received: 10119/2012 1140h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South 1210325-001A TWN-08 10152012 10/1512012 0903h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 1210325-001B TWN-08 10152012 10115/2012 0903h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-002A TWN-08R 10152012 10115/2012 0834h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-002B TWN-08R 10152012 10/1512012 0834h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Phone: [phone] 1210325-003A TWN-13 10152012 1011512012 0953h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Toll Free: [phone] 1210325-003B TWN-13 10152012 10/15/2012 0953h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: (801) ~63-8687 1210325-004A TWN-05 10152012 10/15/2012 1045h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-004B TWN-05 10152012 10/15/2012 1045h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
~-mail: [e-mail] 1210325-005A TWN-01 10152012 10/15/2012 1150h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-005B TWN-01 10152012 10115/2012 1150h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
web: www.awal-Iabs.com 1210325-006A TWN-10 10162012 10116/2012 0633h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-006B TWN-10 10162012 10116/2012 0633h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-007 A TWN-07 10162012 10116/2012 0645h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Kyle F. Gross 1210325-007B TWN-07 10162012 10/1612012 0645h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Laboratory Director 1210325-008A TWN-04 10152012 10/15/2012 1442h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-008B TWN-04 10152012 10/1512012 1442h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Jose Rocha 1210325-009A TWN-06 10152012 10/15/2012 1517h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
QA Officer 1210325-009B TWN-06 10152012 10115/2012 1517h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-010A TWN-12 10162012 10/16/2012 0732h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-010B TWN-12 10162012 10/16/2012 0732h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-011A TWN-11 10162012 1011612012 0823h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-011B TWN-11 10162012 10/16/2012 0823h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-012A TWN-15 10172012 10117120120704h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-012B TWN-15 10172012 10117/2012 0704h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-013A TWN-18 10162012 10/1612012 0939h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-013B TWN-18 10162012 10116/2012 0939h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-014A TWN-16 10162012 10116/2012 1016h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-014B TWN-16 10162012 10116/2012 1016h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-015A TWN-14 10172012 10117/2012 0715h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-015B TWN-14 10172012 10/1712012 0715h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-016A TWN-19 10162012 10116/2012 1224h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-016B TWN-19 10162012 . 10116/2012 1224h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-017A TWN-17 10172012 10117/2012 0725h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-017B TWN-17 10172012 10117/2012 0725h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-018A TWN-09 10172012 10117/2012 0734h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-018B TWN-09 10172012 10/17/2012 0734h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 2 of36
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this comp'any or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, promotion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
American West Lab Set ID: 1210325
ANA LY TICAL LABORATORIES Date Received: 10/19/2012 1140h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
1210325-019A TWN-03 10172012 1011712012 0747h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
463 West 3600 South 1210325-019B TWN-03 10172012 10/17/2012 0747h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 1210325-020A TWN-02 10172012 10/1712012 0755h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-020B TWN-02 10172012 10117/2012 0755h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-021A TWN-11R 10162012 1011612012 0756h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-021B TWN-11R 10162012 10116/2012 0756h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Phone: [phone] 1210325-022A Piez-01 10172012 10117/2012 0833h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
foIl Free: [phone] 1210325-022B Piez-01 10172012 10/1712012 0833h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Fax: [phone] 1210325-023A Piez-02 10172012 10/17/2012 0809h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
~-maiI: [e-mail] 1210325-023B Piez-02 10172012 1011712012 0809h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-024A Piez-03 10172012 1011712012 0821h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
web: www.awal-Iabs.com 1210325-024B Piez-03 10172012 1011712012 0821h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
1210325-025A TWN-60 10172012 1011712012 0910h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-025B TWN-60 10172012 10/17/2012 0910h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Kyle F. Gross 1210325-026A TWN-65 10152012 10115/2012 1442h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-026B TWN-65 10152012 10/15/2012 1442h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2 Laboratory Director 1210325-027A TWN-70 10172012 10117/2012 0704h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1210325-027B TWN-70 10172012 10117/2012 0704h Aqueous NitritelNitrate (as N), E353.2
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 3 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfomled in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent, use of t~e name of this comjlany or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in. c?nnection with the advertisement, pro.motion or sale .of any product or process, or in connection with the re.-publication of this report for any
Inorganic Case Narrative
American West Client: ANALYTICA L LABORATORIES Denison Mines
Garrin Palmer
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Contact:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
1210325
10119/2012
lOllS & 10116, & 10/17/2012
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were -analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): ,All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MSIMSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions: Nitratelnitrite on sample 1210325-001B exhibited MS and
MSD percent recoveries outside of control limits due to sample matrix interference
and high RPDs due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 4 of36
All analyses applicable to. the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are perfo.nned in acco.rdance to. NELAC proto.Co.ls. Pertinent sampling info.nnatio.n is lo.cated o.n the attached COCo This repo.rt is pro.vided fo.r the exclusive use o.fthe addressee. Privileges o.f
subsequent useof the name o.f this co.mpany o.r any member o.f its staff, o.r repro.ductio.n o.f this repo.rt in. c?nnectio.n ",:,ith the adverti~ement, promo.tio.n o.r sale .o.f any pro.duct o.r pro.cess, o.r in co.nnectio.n with the re.-publicatio.n o.f this repo.rt fo.r any
American West ANALYT1CAL LABORATORiES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1210325
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Sample ID
1210325-008BDUP
1210325-026BDUP
Analyte
NitratelNitrite (as N)
NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
__ QCBJJMlVlARY RErQRT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units
mg/L
mg/L
Method
E353.2
E353.2
Result
1.41
1.47
Amount
Spiked
Dept: WC
QC Type: DUP
Original
Amount
1.448
1.451
O~REC Limits
/\ -Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Iriformation herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
%RPD
2.43
1.11
RPD
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Limit Qual Date Analyzed
20
20
/\
/\
10/31120121743h
10/3112012 1745h
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 32 of36
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West.
ANALYT iCAL LABoRATOR I ES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1210325
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Sample ID Analyte
LCS-R46581 Chloride
LCS-R46667 Chloride
LCS-R46668 Chloride
LCS-R46725 Chloride
LCS-R46569 NitratelNitrite (as N)
LCS-R46665 NitratelNitrite (as N)
LCS-R46902 NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT _
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 4.85 5.000 0 97.1 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5.06 5.000 0 101 90-110
mg/L E300.0 5.17 5.000 0 103 90-110
mg/L E300.0 4.92 5.000 0 98.5 90-110
mglL E353.2 0.900 1.000 0 90.0 90-110
mg/L E353.2 0.977 1.000 0 97.7 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.00 1.000 0 100 90-110
/\ -Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
10/24/2012 1522h
1012512012 0430h
10/26/2012 0043h
10/29/20122022h
10/2412012 2053h
10/26120122129h
/\ 10/3112012 1722h
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 33 of36
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTI CAL LABORATORIE S
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1210325
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Sample ID Analyte
MB-R46581 Chloride
MB-R46667 Chloride
MB-R46668 Chloride
MB-R46725 Chloride
MB-R46569 NitratelNitrite (as N)
MB-R46665 NitratelNitrite (as N)
MB-R46902 NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
_QC __ SJJM~ARX_RE]~!!B.J_
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mgIL . E300.0 < 1.00
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00
mgIL E300.0 < 1.00
mg/L E300.0 < 1.00
mg/L E353.2 < 0.100
mg/L E353.2 < 0.100
mg/L E353.2 < 0.100
1\ _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
1012412012 1501h
1012512012 0409h
10/26/2012 0022h
10/29/2012 1959h
10/24/2012 2051 h
1012612012 2127h
1\ 10/3112012 1721 h
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 34 of36
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABO RATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1210325
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012
Sample ID Analyte
1210325-001AMS Chloride
1210325-003AMS Chloride
1210325-012AMS Chloride
1210325-019AMS Chloride
1210325-021AMS Chloride
1210325-001BMS NitratelNitrite (as N)
1210325-010BMS NitratelNitrite (as N)
1210325-023BMS NitratelNitrite (as N)
1210327-018CMS NitratelNitrite (as N)
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
_.Q~~ILMJ\'ARYJ1EPQR~_ ..
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: WC
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
mg/L E300.0 59.0 50.00 11.06 95.9 90-110
mg/L E300.0 546 500.0 47.35 99.6 90-110
mgIL E300.0 559 500.0 46.98 102 90-110
mg/L E300.0 655 500.0 148.9 101 90-110
mg/L E300.0 50.7 50.00 0.1450 101 90-110
mg/L E353.2 0.890 1.000 0 89.0 90-110
mg/L E353.2 11.5 10.00 1.409 101 90-110
mg/L E353.2 1.20 1.000 0.1923 101 90-110
mg/L E353.2 0.957 1.000 0.007600 95 .0 90-110
1\ _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
10/24/2012 1626h
10/26/2012 0126h
10/26/2012 0541 h
10/29/2012 2129h
10/25/2012 0534h
10/24/2012 2112h
10/26/2012 2139h
10/26/20122215h
1\ 10/3112012 1730h
Report Date: 1112/2012 Page 35 of36
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
~
American West _Q~_SUMM_ARYJlE_PQ_R_T __ ANA LY 'fleA L LABORATOR! ES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1210325 Dept: WC
Project: 4th Quarter Nitrate 2012 QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Sample ID Analyte Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
1210325-001AMSD Chloride mg/L E300.0 61.8 50.00 11.06 101 90-110
1210325-003AMSD Chloride mgIL E300.0 561 500.0 47.35 103 90-110
1210325-012AMSD Chloride mg/L E300.0 547 500.0 46.98 99.9 90-110
1210325-019AMSD Chloride mg/L E300.0 651 500.0 148.9 101 90-110
1210325-021AMSD Chloride mg/L E300.0 49.0 50.00 0.1450 97.8 90-110
1210325-001BMSD NitrateINitrite (as N) mg/L E353.2 0.654 1.000 0 65.4 90-110
1210325-010BMSD NitrateINitrite (as N) mg/L E353.2 12.5 10.00 1.409 110 90-110
1210325-023BMSD NitrateINitrite (as N) mg/L E353.2 1.18 1.000 0.1923 99.2 90-110
1210327-018CMSD NitrateINitrite (as N) mg/L E353.2 0.970 1.000 0.007600 96.3 90-110
1\ _ Reissue of a previously generated report. Information has been added, updated, or revised. Information herein supersedes that of the previously issued reports.
J _ Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
@ -High RPD due to suspected sample non-homogeneity or matrix interference.
%RPD
4.57
2.71
2.3
0.537
3.27
30.5
8.12
1.66
1.38
RPD
Limit
20
20
20
20
20
10
10
10
10
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
10/24/2012 1647h
1012612012 0147h
1012612012 0602h
10/29/20122151h
10125/20120555h
l@ 10/24/20122114h
10/2612012 2140h
10126/2012 2216h
/\ 10/3112012 1732h
Report Date: 11/212012 Page 36 of36
I analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1210325
Client:
Client ID:
Project:
Comments:
Sample ID
1210325-001A
1210325-001B
1210325-002A
1210325-002B
12l0325-003A
1210325-003B
1210325-004A
1210325-004B
1210325-005A
1210325-005B
1210325-006A
1210325-006B
1210325-007 A
1210325-007B
Denison Mines
DEN100 Contact:
Page 1 of4
Garrin Palmer
4th Quarter Nitrate 2012 QC Level: II+ WO Type:
PA Rush. QC 2+& Summary. MUST report project specific DL's: CI @ 1 mg/L, N02IN03 @ 0.1 mg/L. EDD-Denison & LOCUS. CC
kathy. [e-mail];
Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix . Test Code
TV{N-08_l0152012 1011512012 0903h 10119/20121140h 10/30/2012 Aqueous 300.0-W
SEL Analytes: C~
N02/N03-W-
353.2
SEL Allalytes: N03NO~N
TWN-08R_10 1520 12 10/15/20l20834h 300.0-W
SEL Allalytes: CL
N02/N03-W-
353.2
SEL Analytes: N03N02N -.
TWN-13_10152012 10115/20120953h 300.0-W
SEL Analytes: CL
N02IN03-W-
353.2
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
" ---------,
TWN-05_10152012 10115/2012 1045h 300.0-W
~EL An~~xtes: CL ----,.,
N02/N03-W-
353.2
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
TV{N-01_10 152012 10115120121150h 300.0-W
SEL Analytes: CL
N02IN03-W-
353.2
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
TV{N-I0_10162012 10/16/20120633h 300.0-W
SEL Allalytes: CL ---------
N02/N03-W-
353.2
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
TV{N-07_l0l62012 lO/i 612012 0645h 300.0-W
SEL Analy~~s: CL --------.--.-
N02IN03-W-
353.2
SEL Analytes: ~03N02.I'_l ____
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M,/!J RT)Zf c¢ TA¢ a¢ HOK~ HOK __ HOK __ . HOK
10/19/2012
Sel Storage
~ df -cl
~ df -n02/n03
~ df-cl
~ df -n02/n03
~ df -cl
~ df -n02/n03
~ df-cl
~ df -n02/n03
~ df -cl
~ df -n02/n03
~ df -cl
~ df -n02/n03
~ df -c1
~ df -n02/n03
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1210325
Client: Denison Mines Page 2 of4 10/19/2012
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1210325-008A TWN-04_10152012 10/15/20121442h 10119/20121140h 10/30/2012 Aqueous 300.0-W ~ df -c1
SEL Analytes: CL
1210325-008B N02IN03-W-~ df -n02/n03
353.2
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1210325-009A TWN-06_10152012 10115/20121517h 300.0-W ~ df-c1
SEL Analytes: CL
1210325-009B N02/N03-W-~ df -n02/n03
353.2
SEL Allalytes: N03N02N _.--.
1210325-010A TWN-12_10162012 10/16/20120732h 300.0-W ~ df -c1
SEL Allalytes: CL
1210325-010B N02IN03-W-~ df -n02/n03
353.2
--SEL Allalyt~s: N03N02N
1210325-011A TWN-l1_10162012 10116/20120823h 300.0-W ~ df -cl
~EL Allalytes: CL -1210325-011B N02/N03-W-~ df -n02/n03
353.2
SE~ Allalytes: N93N02N
1210325-012A TWN-15_10172012 10/17/20120704h 300.0-W ~ df -cl
SEL Allalytes: CL
1210325-012B N02/N03-W----~ df-n02/n03
353.2
SEL Allalytes: N03N02N
~~----... -.--.-------
1210325-013A TWN-18_10162012 10116/20120939h 300.0-W ~ df -cl
SEL Allalytes: CL -
1210325-013B N02/N03-W-~ df-n02/n03
353.2
SEL A!l_alytes: N03~02N --
1210325-014A TWN-16_10162012 10/16/20121016h 300.0-W ~ df -cl
SEL Allalytes: CL -------
1210325-014B N02/N03-W-~ df -n02/n03
353.2
SEL AllRI_ytes: N03Nq2N
1210325-015A TWN-14_10172012 10/17/2012 0715h 300.0-W ~ df -cl
SEL Analytes: CL -------.•.
1210325-015B N02/N03-W-~ df-n02/n03
353.2
~~-.---
SEL Analy'~es: N03NO~~
1210325-016A TWN~19_10162012 10/16120121224h 300.0-W ~ df -c1
S~L Allalytes: .fL ------.•.
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CND TAT D QCD HOK __ HOK __ HOK HOK
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1210325
Client: Denison Mines Page 3 of4 10/19/2012
Sample ID Client Sample ill Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1210325-016B TWN-19_10162012 10116/2012 1224h 10119/2012 1140h 10/3012012 Aqueous N02IN03-W-~ df -n02/n03 '
353.2
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1210325-017A TWN-17_10172012 10117/2012 0725h 300.0-W ~ df -cl
SEL Analytes: CL
1210325-017B N02IN03-W-~ df-n02/n03
353.2
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
1210325-018A TWN-09_10172012 10/17120120734h 300.0-W ~ df -cl
SEL Analyt~s: CL
1210325-018B N02/N03-W-~ df-n02/n03
353.2
SEL Analytes: N03N02N --
12l0325-019A TWN-03_10172012 1O/17120120747h 300.0-W ~ df-cl
SEL Analytes: CL
1210325-019B N02/N03-W-~ df -n02/n03
353.2
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
l210325-020A TWN-02_10172012 10117/20120755h 300.0-W ~ df -cl
SE~ Analytes: CL
1210325-020B N02IN03-W-~ df-n02/n03
353.2
SEL Anal~tes: N03N02~ ---•.. ---
1210325-021A TWN-Il R _10 1620 12 10/16/20120756h 300.0-W --~ df -cl
SEL Analytes: CL
1210325-0218 N02IN03-W-~ df-n02/n03
353.2
SEL Analytes: N03N02N
l210325-022A Piez-Ol_1O 172012 10/17/20120833h 300.0-W ~ df-c1
SEL AnalJtes: CL
1210325-022B N02/N03-W-~ df-n02/n03
353.2
SE~_Allalytes: N03N02N -------
1210325-023A Piez-02_10172012 10/17/20120809h 300.0-W ~ df-cl
SEL Analytes: CL
1210325-023B N02/N03-W-~ df -n02/no3
353.2
SEL Analytes: NO:3N02N -1210325-024A Piez-03_10172012 10117/20120821h 300.0-W -~ df -cl
---.---S~L Analytes: ~L
1210325-024B N02/N03-W-~ df -no2/no3
353.2
SEL ~nalytes: NO~~~2N
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M D RT D CND TAT 0 QC D HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ HOK
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1210325
Client: Denison Mines Page 4 of4 10/19/2012
SampleID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1210325-025A TvnN-60_10172012 10117120120910h 10/19/2012 1140h 10/30/2012 Aqueous 300.0-W ~ df -cl
SEL Allalytes: CL
1210325-0258 N02/N03-W-~ df -no2/no3
353.2
SEL Allalytes: N03N02N
1210325-026A TWN-65_10152012 10/15/20121442h 300.0-W ~ df -cl
SEL Allalytes: CL
1210325-0268 N02/N03-W-~ df -no2/no3
353.2
SEL Allalytes: ~03N02N -.~.
1210325-027 A TvnN-70_10172012 10/17/2012 0704h 300.0-W ~ df -c1
SEL Allalytes: CL
1210325-027B N02/N03-W-~ df -no2/no3
353.2
SEL Allal):'!~s: N03N02N
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill outon page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK __ HOK __ HOK __ _ HOK __
Client Ell' e...r!?} ,,' (:' vt;<! $: . I
Address (;14.7=5 .5 ~ H w,/ I q I
l~Jc---"",Jl~ A C! U -r f<L.-15i \
City "'-.) State Zip
Phone Y35 67 ~ ;,21.1.1 Fax ____________ __
Contact G c ..... r r~ .6. p,,-\ "AA t!--~~
E-mail ,apod.N\..el-P<&.A."-("~iPye..\..s. L.-Dy:V\ U·~ . Project Name tv y p..L t r-c'f ,;lJ! 1-r e-J-, .1016t!
Project Number/P.O.# _________ _
Sampler Name Tc.-II'.A..l:!--'I-\-\ Q ll'.elt<y
DatelTime
Collected
AMERICAN
WEST CHAIN OF
CUSTODY ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES [phone]
[phone]
Salt Lake City, Utah Fax [phone]
463 West 3600 South
84115 Email:[e-mail]
TESTS REQUIRED
-.. "
Lab Sample Set # /~/032S
. Page I . Of~
Turn Around Time (Circle Onej:(l"(1~
1 day 2day 3day 4day 5 day E~
QC LE~~EL ! LABORATORY USE ONLY
IV -~ I" ~ SAMPJ..ESWERE: ~ '1:. A 1 2 2 -. 1 hipped 0 ha~d cJelivered
;..~
.~ . ~ ~ + otes: y:::-~ J\
~ J.. .' Z ~ 3+ 4 2 Ambient or OOi\i2d).ed . ~ 'I,) <.J Notes: .C7
.~ 0 -1--15 I ~.~ ~,ttlt111t.-3 Temperature -<"'i-e
I Sample 10 ~ ~ ;t ;,.: I . . ~ COMMENTS 4 Received Broken/leaking
"'-WN-Dg 'O'5~DI;l. . lo/l~/jo/)q() ~ w '1. y. X ~mpropedyS~l
,-Wi1/-n/BI2_,OI5;2.Di;l. IO/IS/i1}tJ23Ll _'!! 2. X >< Notes. U
I ,WA!-I:LIDI52cl1. 10/15./la./ OQS'3 . .-J 2. X X ~~YPreserv~
: TIVN-c.5. 1015201;/. lo115M-/IOY5 W 2.. )( X . ~edatBenchN
l-' 4tH!;; iQ.53.7FP'2 -rW)J-OI_JOI5.:2-01~JC"Sjf~/H5D w ~ 'I.. X Notes:
TW /IJ-IO_ rOlb:2.01 ~ IIOI16LL2k6-:l?_l\.JlaJ X Ix
/wN-01_,q'~~(.}I~. I ~()J;bllJ-/06Y5Iwla.1 ~ Ixl 11~~~~~in
r .lBt'ts:
1--
·1-wAI-J~1_1Dj6~lDI;;2. I 16/161 ,~7 C>7:sal wlalx: Ix
'T-> j1.j. ... I 1_ I () It-;;to i .. ~ Icoe Tape Was:
-r wA.) -15_ I v, 7?.t> 12 1 Present on Outer
-~ ...... ck. age
Relinquished By: Signatu:!... .n J _
;;'~f".~
PRINT NAME /' ., {>~\~~ l,:?o...r-r, v'-I ~ed By: Signature
PRINTNA~
Relinquished By: Signature ~
PRINT NAME
Relinquished By: Sign turE;~
PRINT NAME
~~i i g 11.:2..II~BY: Signature
Time IIPRINTNA~··· ...
1300 . "
Date Received B~: Signature ~
Time PRfNTNAME ~
........
Date Received By: Signature
~ PRINT NAME
Date Special Instructions:
Time
Date
Time
~
Time .......... Irl =======---------=======j
<.!..J N NA
2 Unbroken on Outer (p~ckage 'J' N NA
3 prese~~mple
Y V NA
4 Unbroken on samcD Y N NA
Discrepancies Betwee
Sample Labels and COC
Record? 0 Y N
Notes:
Client £.A&LS¥ £ve l s
Address 6y.bS 5 e H wy 19l
B ItA.AA~!A.:§, VI BYS\ \
City State Zip
Phone t{sS' 67R 2.12\ Fax. ______ _
Contact 6~r-r='i A. PeA.: l """",e.c
E-mail gpax\v......e.r-e<e.A e.r-bY tv d (~LOA
Project Name t...j '4-~ OL?p...r-\-cr-Ali .\:r-",+e.-:lOL~
Project Number/P.O.# _________ _
Sampler Name ''G.c...6A e,.., H ",11 ~ ,MY
DatelTime
Collected
AMERICAN
WEST CHAIN OF
CUSTODY ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES [phone]
[phone]
Salt Lake City, Utah Fax [phone]
463 West 3600 South
;J 'i -4-! <5 I~ t;-j: q)
,~ ':.i ~ ~ + 'I:
(.) ~1 ~
X '0 .:::..-·c.... '.J 16 ~ 1
84115 Email:[e-mail]
TESTS REQUIRED
-",
Lab Sample Set # 12 / () ~.<. S-
, Page \ 2--of ~ 3 \i;..>~\.JI~, \~ i-\tO) \ ...... Turn Around Time (Circle One)
1 day 2 day 3 day 4 day 5 day ed~
QC LEVEL ~~~d~
1 2 ~
M 3+ 4
~'~H'"
LABORATORY USE ONLY
~AM SWE: ,hipped r han ,delivered
Notes: -)(
2 Ambient or~
Notes: ~
3 Temperature 2.'-t·C
"""~ JI& ~ENTS Sample 10 ~ ~ "! \.\ : < ,,",VIVII" .
.... ' ... w .. 'Al-I X'.'. 1{)1620lit \""~il~1 Dq3~ L.J 1. K -;( . ~;;'p~~p;rIY's;~~"
'T\.v';\J-l6_1 £> l6~o l:l \rdI6},a./l Dt6 t,J 2. "t' t< ,~es: U
Pr0p.1IY preserv~
,ed at Bench TWAJ-i~_'O'7.zoI;l. hoIl7/f:L/0715'lul2.1 )('1 'l<
y J N Tw,Al-lq_IDI6~DI~ hb/f6-/L1.J'1.~1 ... dWIQI 'll?< ores:
TW,Ai-17, 1017:l.o l.2. 10/17/1:;"/ D71..5 u ~ ''/w' X ~~~
TWA/-Oq. JDI7;2.o\.Q. ~CJ(j7112.'()7~~L./ W ~ )( « "ol\~f\'£-
, 6 Received Within
'rW,Y -O>_IDI7~Ol-2 iloh7!t2-1 D747 tJ 2. 'f X ~dingTimeS N
I 'rtJA/-D,2_IO/7U>iJ.. loh7ilJ-D7S5 t.-J :L t< ;X (jJJtes:
I TWA! -II R_IOl62Dl ~ . lOil6il:'L/ D7S6 w:2 y.: X
P;e:z..-01_'0)7.;2..01.2. hc;JI7IiA/D~331t.J11.1 X 1><
Pi' z-D2._10172..01.2.. COCTapeWas:
PI -.3_ i D 17 ~o I 2.. 1 Present on Outer ~age
Relinquished BY~= .eJ~_ '_-I-~'-'-"i:..r....L.~II--_"';;:"oe--__ ~ N
NA
II I ,2 Unbroken on Outer Time PRINT NAME / '. rr::-f-age \J N NA (fl' .... t"f"I.A p ~ til""-e/"
Received By: Sig~ature ~ R~y: Signature Date Date
PRINTNAME ~ Time PRINT NAME ~
Relinquished By: Signature Received By: Signature
PRINT NAME PRINT NAME
Relinquished By: Signature raw ¥L! 6~ PRINT NAME Time
Time
3 present~~Ple
Y U NA
4 Unbrok.en on Sampl
Y N
Discrepancies Between
Sample Labels and29COC
Record? Y N
Notes:
Client . g ....... c,..r,£ Eqt? .. ·ts
Address 61..-} ~5 S. H (MY I 9 I
glc...~~~ r2T ~Y5il ,
City --=" State Zip
Contact 6-,==r'llQ, P G--l /'-".-e-r
E-mail bPc;;..I.;yyv e,(: lI1<r.C:S)"~V(~ Ls 'OvY'
Project Name I-l ,,..~ D':tl..C-. £:.l::'=l: ).): -I::r-e::: +-~ 2'212
Project Number/P.O.# OatelTime
Sampler Name r;~,A..e.r-If D t l-j t!Cl'-t-Collected
Sample ID
-rW/J·...; 60_ID172ot ~ ~
1i->.N'-6"5 101520 1"'2.. ~!3!il
IVA! -70_/0 17 ,/-Of:L lbl11L1J..,~Ll
.... -,
T f'_MD l3ltJ-Al( 'DJI8'II~
Relinquished By: Signa!::!e p ~ .,'v~ Date ~ed By: Signature lj)ltxlJ~
PRINT NAME (; , Time PRINTN~ Pt-L"""u L~c>o '.:rr_r,.. .A
~ed By: Signature Date Received By: Signat~
X ·c rn :2
~
I~
w
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
CHAIN OF
CUSTODY
[phone]
[phone]
TESTS REQUIRED
·1 ! ....\-~
<II ~ ~ ~ ]I -\-L c 0 ~ ~ (,)
't5 .--..
~ t ~
:J .~ ~ z .~
~ y. X
2-"I )<
~ )< [;<-
Date Special Instructions:
Time
Date
PRINTNAME~ Time PRINT NAME ~ Time
........
Relinquished By: Signature ~ Date Received By: Signature ......... ~
PRINT NAME Ti~ PRINT NAME Time~
_~ttjgna~1 Relinquished ~jgJture ~ Date ~ D~rlr I~ '11,'(7
PRINT NAME \ Time PRINTNAMI; /, ~f / / I Time ..
~"
Lab Sample Set # /A It~ z r
. Page ~ 3 of __ 3=--__
",wJ,y,'t A~
Turn Around Time (Circle One)
-
QCLE~tL LABORATORY USE ONLY ~~ ... ~,.; ~(~/~ SAMP S RE:
1 hipped h~eliVered 1 2 2+ Notes: R ,-X
~ 3+ 4
2 Ambient or ~
Notes:
3 Temperature]..' if·C "ll~'>'--
C MMENTS 4 Received Bro~ng (Improperly Sa dJ
Y N
Notes:
l11f1y Preserved Y N
eked at Bench y N
Notes:
l!i!f ived Within
Hold ng Times
Y N
as:
eoe Tape Was:
1 Present on Outer
Y N ~kage NA
~ken on Outer a age
Y N NA
3 prese~Ple Y N NA
4 Unbroken on sar," Y N NA
./
Discrepancies Between
Sample Labels av Record?
Y ~'
Notes: .
PreservationChecl< Sheet
Lab Sample Set #: 1210325
N02/N03: pH <2 H2S04
NOz/N03: pH <2 H2S04
TabH
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
H-l Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
Volume ' '., ',;-.' .' 1'"-"
Conducti~ity Q.edox Potential
' ,-
'rurbidity Location 2x Casing Volume Pumped Volume Check RPD pH '.' RPD ' Temp RPD I~-,-RPD '" -RPD -
Piezometer 1 --2148.0 NC 9.65 NC 13.11 NC 169 NC 1.2 NC
Piezometer 2 --713.0 NC 7.60 NC 13.08 NC 159 NC 3.7 NC
Piezometer 3 --2969.0 NC 12.49 NC 12.99 NC 73 NC 11.4 III • NC
TWN-l 38.70 77.40 80.00 OK 800.0 799.0 0.13 7.34 7.32 0.27 15.03 15.05 0.13 191 191 0.00 72.8 72.1 0.97
TWN-2 47.24 94.48 57.50 Pumped Dry 3127.0 3115.0 0.38 6.13 6.08 0.82 14.16 14.19 0.21 199 193 3.06 6.8 ~ 12.8 61.22
TWN-3 40.51 81.02 45.00 Pumped Dry 2501.0 2490.0 0.44 7.14 7.15 0.14 13.36 13.39 0.22 191 187 2.12 7.0 II 8.3 16.99
TWN-4 53.61 107.22 130.00 OK 1012.0 1011.0 0.10 7.19 7.19 0.00 14.60 14.60 0.00 215 213 0.93 62.5 III 63.2 1.11
TWN-5 52.47 104.94 110.00 OK 3018.0 3018.0 0.00 6.79 6.80 0.15 14.81 14.82 0.07 177 176 0.57 5.3 5.1 3.85
TWN-6 35.78 71.56 80.00 OK 1501.0 1502.0 0.07 7.07 7.04 0.43 14.86 14.85 0.07 181 179 1.11 221'.8 2~.O 0.91
TWN-7 11.19 22.38 10.QO Pumped Dry 1245.0 1260.0 1.20 6.27 6.35 1.27 13.31 13.49 1.34 509 488 4.21 45.0 51.7 13.86
TWN-8 54.30 108.60 120.00 OK 2392.0 2395.0 0.13 7.12 7.10 0.28 14.50 14.51 0.07 126 129 2.35 20.5 iii il'I 20.8 1.45
TWN-9 22.54 45.08 30.00 Pumped Dry 2556.0 2546.0 0.39 7.15 7.13 0.28 13.35 13.33 0.15 190 186 2.13 III 14.4 17.1 17.14
TWN-lO 15.73 31.46 27.50 Pumped Dry 3545.0 3559.0 0.39 3.01 3.10 2.95 14.00 14.10 0.71 458 450 1.76 4.9 7.9 46.88
TWN-ll 47.44 94.88 100.00 OK 2743.0 2743.0 0.00 6.83 6.85 0.29 14.67 14.67 0.00 339 339 0.00 ,Jt 50.0 0 51.0 1.98
TWN-12 54.06 108.12 120.00 OK 2410.0 2409.0 0.04 7.31 7.31 0.00 14.25 14.28 0.21 320 319 0.31 205J) ",200.0 2.47
TWN-13 48.39 96.78 100.00 OK 1201.0 1204.0 0.25 7.76 7.81 0.64 15.05 15.05 0.00 138 131 5.20 11.9 '; H.O 7.86
TWN-14 47.37 94.74 50.00 Pum.,Qed Dry 1226.0 1240.0 1.14 7.17 7.20 0.42 13.94 14.00 0.43 162 159 1.87 6.3 "'12.9 68.75
TWN-15 41.26 82.52 60.00 Pum.,Qed Dry 1756.0 1762.0 0.34 6.98 6.94 0.57 14.26 14.31 0.35 160 154 3.82 1.1 4.9 126.67
TWN-16 34.21 68.42 70.00 OK 1829.0 1820.0 0.49 7.03 7.01 0.28 14.72 14.72 0.00 345 345 0.00 1-" 18.0 Ii r9.0~ 5.41
TWN-17 49.86 99.72 60.00 Pumped Dry 1139.0 1136.0 0.26 7.38 7.38 0.00 13.94 14.05 0.79 181 183 1.10 7.5 16.'1 ,. 72.88
TWN-18 56.87 113.74 120.,00 OK 2151.0 2149.0 0.09 6.99 6.99 0.00 14.44 14.44 0.00 329 329 0.00 III 163.Q 159.0 2.48
TWN-19 37.77 75 .54 80.00 OK 1950.0 1941.0 0.46 7.31 7.30 0.14 15.08 15.07 0.07 171 168 1.77 16.5'·-·· 15.9 3.70
~ Piezometers 1, 2, and 3 were not pumped, only one set of parameters were taken.
TWN-2, TWN-3, TWN-7, TWN-9, TWN-lO, TWN-14, TWN-15, and TWN-17 were pumped dry and sampled after recovery.
easurements be less than 5 NTU prior to
H-2: Holding Time Evaluation
Hold Time Allowed Hold Hold Time
Location ID Parameter Name Sample Date Analysis Date (Days) Time (Days) Check
PIEZ-Ol Chloride 1011712012 10/2512012 8 28 OK
PIEZ-Ol NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011712012 1012612012 9 28 OK
PIEZ-02 Chloride 1011712012 1012512012 8 28 OK
PIEZ-02 NitratelNitrite (as N) 10/1712012 1012612012 9 28 OK
PIEZ-03 Chloride 10/1712012 1012512012 8 28 OK
PIEZ-03 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011712012 1012612012 9 28 OK
TWN-Ol Chloride 1011512012 1012612012 11 28 OK
TWN-Ol NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011512012 10124/2012 9 28 OK
TWN-02 Chloride 1011712012 1012512012 8 28 OK
TWN-02 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011712012 1012612012 9 28 OK
TWN-03 Chloride 1011712012 1012912012 12 28 OK
TWN-03 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011712012 1012612012 9 28 OK
TWN-04 Chloride 1011512012 1012612012 11 28 OK
TWN-04 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011512012 10/3112012 16 28 OK
TWN-05 Chloride 1011512012 1012612012 11 28 OK
TWN-05 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011512012 1012412012 9 28 OK
TWN-06 Chloride 1011512012 1012612012 11 28 OK
TWN-06 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011512012 1012412012 9 28 OK
TWN-07 Chloride 1011612012 1012412012 8 28 OK
TWN-07 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011612012 1012412012 8 28 OK
TWN-08 Chloride 1011512012 1012412012 9 28 OK
TWN-08 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011512012 1012412012 9 28 OK
TWN-08R Chloride 1011512012 1012412012 9 28 OK
TWN-08R NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011512012 1012412012 9 28 OK
TWN-09 Chloride 1011712012 1012912012 12 28 OK
TWN-09 NitratelNitrite (as N) 10/1712012 1012612012 9 28 OK
TWN-io Chloride 10/1612012 1012612012 10 28 OK
TWN-I0 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011612012 1012412012 8 28 OK
TWN-11 Chloride 1011612012 1012612012 10 28 OK
TWN-11 NitratelNitrite (as N) 10/1612012 1012612012 10 28 OK
TWN-IIR Chloride 1011612012 1012512012 9 28 OK
TWN-IIR NitratelNitrite (as N) 10/1612012 1012612012 10 28 OK
TWN-12 Chloride 10/1612012 1012612012 10 28 OK
TWN-12 NitratelNitrite (as N) 10/1612012 10/2612012 10 28 OK
TWN-13 Chloride 1011512012 1012612012 11 28 OK
TWN-13 NitratelNitrite (as N) 10/1512012 1012412012 9 28 OK
TWN-14 Chloride 10/1712012 1012612012 9 28 OK
TWN-14 NitratelNitrite (as N) 10117/2012 1012612012 9 28 OK
TWN-15 Chloride 1011712012 1012612012 9 28 OK
TWN-15 NitratelNitrite (as N) 10117/2012 1012612012 9 28 OK
TWN-16 Chloride 1011612012 1012612012 10 28 OK
TWN-16 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011612012 1012612012 10 28 OK
TWN-17 Chloride 1011712012 1012612012 9 28 OK
TWN-17 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011712012 1012612012 9 28 OK
TWN-18 Chloride 1011612012 1012612012 10 28 OK
TWN-18 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011612012 1012612012 10 28 OK
TWN-19 Chloride 1011612012 1012612012 10 28 OK
TWN-19 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011612012 10126/2012 10 28 OK
TWN-60 Chloride 1011712012 1012512012 8 28 OK
TWN-60 NitratelNitrite (as N) 10117/2012 10/26/2012 9 28 OK
TWN-65 Chloride 1011512012 1012512012 10 28 OK
TWN-65 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011512012 10/3112012 16 28 OK
TWN-70 Chloride 1011712012 1012512012 8 28 OK
TWN-70 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1011712012 10126/2012 9 28 OK
B-3: Analytical Method Check
, Parameter ;': ,~; 'Method. ' Method Used by Lab . ,
Nitrate E353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
A4500-CI B or A4500-CI E
Chloride or E300.0 E300.0
Both Nitrate and Chloride were analyzed with the correct analytical method.
-eportmg urut ec H 4R L· . Ch k
Lab Required
Reporting Reporting RL Dilution
Location Analyte Limit Units Qualifier Limit Units Check Factor
PIEZ-Ol Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
PIEZ-Ol NitratelNitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 10
PIEZ-02 Chloride 1 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 1
PIEZ-02 NitratelNitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 1
PIEZ-03 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
PIEZ-03 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-Ol Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-Ol NitratelNitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-02 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-02 NitratelNitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 100
TWN-03 Chloride 100 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 100
TWN-03 NitratelNitrite (as N) 10 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 100
TWN-04 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-04 NitratelNitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-05 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-05 NitratelNitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L U 0.1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-06 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-06 NitratelNitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-07 Chloride 1 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-07 NitratelNitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-08 Chloride 1 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-08 NitratelNitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L U 0.1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-08R Chloride 1 mg/L U 1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-08R NitratelNitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L U 0.1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-09 Chloride 100 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 100
TWN-09 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-I0 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-I0 NitratelNitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-ll Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-ll NitratelNitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-llR Chloride 1 mg/L U 1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-llR NitratelNitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L U 0.1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-12 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-12 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-13 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-13 NitratelNitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L U 0.1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-14 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-14 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-15 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-15 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-16 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-16 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-17 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-17 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-18 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-18 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-19 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-19 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-60 Chloride 1 mg/L U 1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-60 NitratelNitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L U 0.1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-65 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-65 NitratelNitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 1
TWN-70 Chloride 10 mg/L 1 mg/L OK 10
TWN-70 NitratelNitrite (as N) 1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L OK 10
H7R . TEl -ecelpt emperature va uatlOn
Sample Batch .'< Wells in Batch . Temperature
Piezometer 1, Piezometer 2, Piezometer 3, TWN-1, TWN-2,
TWN-3, TWN-4, TWN-5, TWN-6, TWN-7, TWN-8, TWN-8R,
1210325 TWN-9, TWN-10, TWN-ll, TWN-llR, TWN-12, TWN-13, 2.4 °C
TWN-14, TWN-15, TWN-16, TWN-17, TWN-18, TWN-19,
TWN-60, TWN-65, TWN-70
H -8 Rinsate Evaluation
All Rinsate and DI Blank samples were non-detect for the 4th quarter of 2012.
Tab I
Kriged Current Quarter Isoconcentration Maps
NS = not sampled; ND = not detected
......... 10
III
MW·4
.4.8
TW4·1
0 6.5
TWN·1
<>0.4
PIEZ·1
--7.7
TW4·27
~36
kriged nitrate isocon and label
kriged nitrate isocon and label
(extent uncertain)
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed October 2011 showing
concentration in mg/L
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
KRIGED 4th QUARTER, 2012 NITRATE (mg/L)
(NITRATE + NITRITE AS N)
APPROVED DATE
WHITE MESA SITE
REFERENCE
H:/718000/feb13/nitrate/Unt1212.srf
FIGURE
I-I
NS = not sampled; ND = not detected
'-100
MW·4
.42
TW4·1
0 40
TWN-1
~18
PIEZ-1
~ 55
TW4·27
~18
kriged chloride isocon and label
perched monitoring well showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
showing concentration in mg/L
temporary perched nitrate monitoring
well showing concentration in mg/L
perched piezometer showing
concentration in mg/L
temporary perched monitoring well
installed October, 2011 showing
concentration in mg/L
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
KRIGED 4th QUARTER, 2012 CHLORIDE (mg/L)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
H:/718000/feb13/chloride/Ucl1212.srf 1-2
TabJ
Analyte Concentrations Over Time
TWN-l
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/6/2009 0.7 19
7/21/2009 0.4 17
9/21/2009 0.4 19
10/28/2009 0.5 18
3/17/2010 0.5 17
5/26/2010 0.6 20
9/27/2010 0.6 19
12/7/2010 0.6 14
1/26/2011 0.5 17
4/20/2011 0.5 19
7/26/2011 0.5 14
10/17/2011 0.5 10
1/9/2012 0.6 15
4/18/2012 0.6 17
7/24/2012 0.6 17
10/15/2012 0.432 17.5
TWN-2
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/6/2009 25.4 29
7/21/2009 25 25
9/21/2009 22.6 17
11/2/2009 20.8 55
3/24/2010 62.1 85
6/2/2010 69 97
9/29/2010 69 104
12/9/2010 48 93
2/1/2011 43 93
4/28/2011 40 85
7/28/2011 33 74
10/20/2011 33 76
1/12/2012 31 86
4/20/2012 48 103
7/31/2012 54 93
10/17/2012 22.1 79
TWN-3
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/6/2009 23.6 96
7/21/2009 25.3 96
9/21/2009 27.1 99
11/2/2009 29 106
3/25/2010 25.3 111
6/3/2010 26 118
7/15/2010 27 106
12/10/2010 24 117
2/1/2011 24 138
4/28/2011 26 128
7/29/2011 25 134
10/20/2011 25 129
1/12/2012 25 143
4/20/2012 24 152
7/31/2012 27 158
10/17/2012 12.1 149
TWN-4
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/6/2009 1 13
7/21/2009 0.05 12
9/21/2009 0.4 13
10/28/2009 0.4 11
3/16/2010 0.9 22
5/27/2010 1.0 22
9/27/2010 0.9 19
12/8/2010 1 21
1/25/2011 0.9 21
4/20/2011 0.9 21
7/26/2011 1.1 35
10/18/2011 0.9 20
1/9/2012 0.9 20
4/18/2012 1.1 24
7/25/2012 1.4 25
10/15/2012 1.45 26.4
TWN-5
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 0.22 42
9/21/2009 0.5 45
11/10/2009 0.2 48
3/16/2010 0.3 43
5/26/2010 0.3 44
7/12/2010 0.3 43
12/7/2010 0.3 45
1/25/2011 0.4 47
4/20/2011 0.3 44
7/26/2011 0.3 44
10/17/2011 0.3 45
1/9/2012 0.2 45
4/18/2012 0.3 39
7/24/2012 0.3 48
10/15/2012 0.1 43.5 Nitrate ND
TWN-6
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 3.2 32
9/22/2009 1.6 13
11/3/2009 1.4 21
3/23/2010 1.5 19
6/1/2010 1.4 22
7/13/2010 1.4 73
12/8/2010 1.2 21
1/26/2011 1.1 18
4/20/2011 1.5 22
7/27/2011 1.1 17
10/18/2011 1.4 21
1/10/2012 1.2 20
4/18/2012 1.1 22
7/25/2012 1.4 22
10/15/2012 0.786 20.4
TWN-7
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 ND 11
9/21/2009 ND 7
11/10/2009 0.1 7
3/17/2010 0.8 6
5/28/2010 1.2 6
7/14/2010 1.6 7
12/10/2010 1 4
1/27/2011 1.3 6
4/21/2011 1.7 6
7/29/2011 0.7 5
10/19/2011 2.2 6
1/11/2012 2.3 5
4/20/2012 1.2 6
7/26/2012 0.9 6
10/16/2012 0.641 5.67
TWN-8
Oate Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I) Notes
8/25/2009 0 11 Nitrate is NO
9/21/2009 0 12 Nitrate is NO
11/10/2009 0 12 Nitrate is NO
3/16/2010 0 11 Nitrate is NO
5/26/2010 0 11 Nitrate is NO
7/12/2010 0 11 Nitrate is NO
12/6/2010 0 9 Nitrate is NO
1/25/2011 0 13 Nitrate is NO
4/18/2011 0 10 Nitrate is NO
7/26/2011 0 18 Nitrate is NO
10/17/2011 0 10 Nitrate is NO
1/9/2012 0 11 Nitrate is NO
4/18/2012 0 15 Nitrate is NO
7/24/2012 0 11 Nitrate is NO
10/15/2012 0 11.1 Nitrate is NO
TWN-9
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 9.3 169
9/22/2009 8.9 201
11/10/2009 12 205
3/23/2010 7.6 183
6/1/2010 7.6 175
7/15/2010 10.7 210
12/9/2010 8 172
2/1/2011 9.5 217
4/28/2011 10 192
7/29/2011 11 208
10/20/2011 10.9 134
1/12/2012 12.2 202
4/20/2012 10.6 209
7/31/2012 12.3 215
10/15/2012 12.5 194
TWN-I0
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
8/25/2009 1.1 19
9/22/2009 1.6 35
11/10/2009 1.4 26
3/23/2010 1.5 54
6/4/2010 1 30
7/14/2010 0.2 21
12/8/2010 1.3 28
1/27/2011 0.3 40
4/21/2011 1.2 28
7/27/2011 0.1 28
10/18/2011 0.2 33
1/10/2012 0.8 44
4/19/2012 0.9 28
7/25/2012 0.6 33
10/16/2012 0.119 30.8
TWN-ll
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/3/2009 1.3 74
3/17/2010 1.4 73
6/4/2010 1.3 72
9/27/2010 1.4 76
12/8/2010 1.4 72
1/27/2011 1.4 84
4/26/2011 1.4 76
7/27/2011 0.1 76
10/17/2011 1.6 76
1/10/2012 1.6 69
4/19/2012 1.6 71
7/25/2012 1.8 77
10/16/2012 1.84 76.4
TWN-12
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/3/2009 0.5 109
3/17/2010 0.7 113
5/26/2010 0.8 106
7/12/2010 0.7 112
12/7/2010 0.7 103
1/26/2011 4.2 87
4/26/2011 1 109
7/26/2011 0.6 102
10/17/2011 1.2 87
1/10/2012 0.9 104
4/18/2012 1.2 106
7/25/2012 1.4 102
10/16/2012 1.41 101
TWN-13
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I) Notes
11/4/2009 0.5 83
3/17/2010 0 47 Nitrate ND
5/26/2010 0.1 49
9/27/2010 0.2 53
12/7/2010 0.4 57
1/25/2011 1.6 103
4/26/2011 0 49 Nitrate ND
7/26/2011 0.1 49
10/17/2011 0 48 Nitrate ND
1/9/2012 0 46 Nitrate ND
4/18/2012 0 53 Nitrate ND
7/24/2012 0.1 48
10/15/2012 0 47.3 Nitrate ND
TWN-14
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/4/2009 3.4 32
3/24/2010 2.9 24
6/2/2010 2.9 30
7/15/2010 3.5 26
12/10/2010 4.2 28
1/28/2011 3.7 24
4/27/2011 3.5 30
7/29/2011 3.5 25
10/19/2011 3.9 27
1/11/2012 3.5 26
4/20/2012 3.4 27
7/27/2012 3.7 27
10/17/2012 4.03 27.4
TWN-15
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/10/2009 1.1 78
3/18/2010 0.7 43
5/28/2010 1.0 39
7/13/2010 1.0 36
12/9/2010 1.2 38
1/27/2011 1.4 43
4/27/2011 1.6 49
7/28/2011 1.6 47
10/19/2011 1.3 38
1/11/2012 1.5 38
4/20/2012 1.6 46
7/26/2012 2.1 50
10/17/2012 1.8 47
TWN-16
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/4/2009 1 39
3/17/2010 1.2 35
5/27/2010 0.2 35
9/27/2010 2.6 35
12/9/2010 2 30
1/27/2011 4.6 34
4/27/2011 1.6 39
7/27/2011 2.4 31
10/18/2011 2.6 34
1/10/2012 2.8 33
4/19/2012 2 50
7/25/2012 2.4 33
10/16/2012 2.5 32.1
TWN-17
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/4/2009 6.7 152
3/24/2010 10.4 78
6/3/2010 11 87
7/15/2010 8.9 66
12/10/2010 8 65
2/1/2011 8.6 90
4/28/2011 9 81
7/29/2011 8.5 74
10/20/2011 8.1 71
1/12/2012 8.7 79
4/20/2012 9.1 80
7/27/2012 9.5 85
10/17/2012 9.65 84.8
TWN-18
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/2/2009 1.3 57
3/17/2010 1.6 42
6/1/2010 1.8 63
9/27/2010 1.8 64
12/9/2010 1.6 59
1/27/2011 1.4 61
4/26/2011 1.8 67
7/28/2011 1.8 65
10/18/2011 1.9 60
1/10/2012 1.9 64
4/19/2012 2.1 64
7/26/2012 2.3 67
10/16/2012 1.95 67.5
TWN-19
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
11/2/2009 7.4 125
3/23/2010 7.2 118
6/1/2010 6.2 113
9/29/2010 7.2 113
12/9/2010 7 107
2/1/2011 7 114
4/28/2011 6.9 120
7/28/2011 7.1 113
10/18/2011 6.5 108
1/10/2012 7 114
4/19/2012 6.8 117
7/26/2012 7.5 117
10/16/2012 7.7 118
Piezometer 1
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/19/2009 6.8 NA
7/14/2009 6.8 60
9/22/2009 7.3 78
10/27/2009 7.4 61
6/2/2010 7.2 52
7/19/2010 6.8 52
12/10/2010 6.5 60
1/31/2011 7 60
4/25/2011 6.8 58
7/25/2011 7 53
10/19/2011 6.6 55
1/11/2012 7.1 78
4/20/2012 6.6 58
7/27/2012 7.2 56
10/17/2012 7.66 55
Piezometer 2
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/19/2009 0.5 NA
7/14/2009 0.5 7
9/22/2009 0.5 17
10/27/2009 0.6 7
6/2/2010 0.6 8
7/19/2010 0.6 8
12/10/2010 0.2 6
1/31/2011 0.3 9
4/25/2011 0.3 8
7/25/2011 0.1 9
10/19/2011 0.1 8
1/11/2012 0.1 9
4/20/2012 0.2 8
7/27/2012 0.2 9
10/17/2012 0.192 9.5
Piezometer 3
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
2/19/2009 0.7 NA
7/14/2009 0.8 12
9/22/2009 0.8 24
10/27/2009 1.2 19
3/24/2010 1.7 116
6/2/2010 1.6 36
7/19/2010 1.6 35
12/10/2010 1.8 25
1/31/2011 1.8 40
4/25/2011 1.7 35
7/25/2011 1.8 61
10/19/2011 1.7 12
1/11/2012 1.8 20
4/20/2012 1.7 53
7/27/2012 1.8 21
10/17/2012 2.75 20.1
Piezometer 4
Date
7/14/2009
Nitrate (mg/I)
1.8
Chloride (mg/I)
46
Piezometer 5
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
7/14/2009 0.7 18
MW-18
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
7/14/2009 ND 51
MW-19
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I)
7/14/2009 2.2 24
Upper Wildlife Pond
Date Nitrate (mg/I) Chloride (mg/I) Note
9/22/2009 0 5 Nitrate ND
10/27/2009 0 3 Nitrate ND
6/2/2010 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
7/19/2010 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
12/10/2010 0 1 Nitrate ND
1/31/2011 0.1 1
4/25/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
7/25/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
10/19/2011 0 0 Nitrate and Chloride ND
1/11/2012 0 2 Nitrate ND
Frog Pond
Date
10/14/09
Nitrate (mg/I)
o
Chloride (mg/I)
o
Notes
Nitrate ND
TabK
Concentration Trend Graphs
tn c:
0 .. ca ~ ... c: Cl)
Co) c:
0 0
Cl) ... ca ~ .~
Z ,...
I Z ~ I-
~----~----~------~----~------~----~----~------~8~-AB~
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa~
o ~-5n'v'
o ~-UBr
60-lnr
80-0ao
~----~------+------+------+------+------+------+------+80-unr
co a CD a L.{) a C\J a o
In c: 0 ;
CO J.. ... c: CI)
() c:
0 0
CI)
"C ";:
0
.s::::
0
T""" I Z ;: .-
r--------r------,-------,---------r-----r 8 ~ -ABV\I
~ ~-des
~ ~-qe,:j
o ~ -6nV
o ~-UBr
60-lnr
80-0eo
~---------+----------~--------~----------_r--------__T 80-Unr
LO C\I o C\I LO o o
0 c 0 .. ca '-...
C
CI)
0 C
0 0
CI) ... ca '-.'!::
Z
N I Z 3: t-
r-----~----~------~----~------r_----~----_,------~8~-Ae~
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa,:j
o ~-6n'v'
O ~-uer
80-0ao
~----~------~----~------+------+------+------+------+80-unr
o cx::> o co o l!) o Ct) o C\I o o
U) c 0 "+=i CO Jo.. ... C CI)
() c 0
(.)
CI) ... CO Jo.. :!::
Z
M I
Z ~ ~
,--------,-----,.----,-----,.------,-----,-----r-8 ~ -I\BII\I
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa~
o ~ -6nV
o ~-UBr
60-lnr
80-0ao
~------~------~------r-------r-------r-------+-------+80-unr
o C')
L()
C\I
o
C\I
L() o o
U) c:
0 ~ ca ~ ... c: Cl)
Co) c:
0 (.)
Cl)
"C .~
0
.t: (.)
N I Z
== I-
r---'----,-----.,....----~----_r__---__,_----_._ 8 ~-kell\l
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa~
o ~ -5nV
o ~-UBr
Bo-oao
r----------+-------~--------+_------~--------~------__+Bo-unr
o C\J o o o co o <0 o C\J o
tn t: 0 "';:; as ~ ... t:
G)
(.) t: 0
0
G)
"'C a;:
0
.J::.
0
('I)
I
Z := I-
,...---,..----.,----...----..,.---..,...---..,...----.-----.-----.-8 ~ -AB~
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa~
o ~-6n'v'
O~-UBr
~----+----~----~-----+-----+----~------~----~--+80-unr
o co o <0 o C\J o o o co o <0 o C\J o
U) c 0
~ CU I-... C
(1)
0 c 0 0
(1) ... CU I-.t::: Z
-.::t I Z
== t-
~----~----~------~----~----~----~~----~----~8~-AB~
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa,:j
o ~-5n\f
O ~-UBr
60-lnr
~----~------~-----+------+------+------+------+------+80-unr
<0 o C\I o o
In c 0 -..:;
CO ~ .... c (1)
(,)
C 0
0
(1)
"C "i:
0
J:
0
~ I
Z s: I-
r------r-------,.----r----......,..---~--__r_--__r---_r 8 ~ -ABV\I
~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa,:j
o ~-5nV'
O~-UBr
60-lnr
~----~------+------+------~--------+------+------+------+Bo-unr
l!)
CI)
l!)
C\J o C\J
(1/6w)
l!) o o
tn
s::::: 0 .';:; ca '-~ s:::::
Q) u
s:::::
0 0
Q)
~ ca '-.t::
Z
Lt) I Z s: I-
r-------~------~--------~------~--------~------~8~-AB~
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::l
o ~-5n'v'
o ~-UBr
60-lnr
r--------------+---------r--------+-------~-----------~--------+80-oaa
CD o l.() o C\J o o
tn c 0 "';:; cu ~ ... c
CI)
(.) c 0 0
CI)
"C ";:
.2
J:
0
Lt)
I
Z 3: t-
,..------,-----..,..--------,-----..,---------r-----r 8 ~ -ABV\J
~ ~-des
~ ~-qe,:j
o ~ -5nV
~-------+--------~--------+_-------4--------_r--------+80-0ea
o <.0 o l.{) o C\I o
tn c 0 ;; as ~ .... c
(1)
(,) c
0 0
(1) .... as ~ .t::::
Z
CD I Z
:s= I-
r-----~------_r------,_------~-----~~----~------_r 8~-AB~
~ ~-des
~ ~-qe.:::l
o~-5nv
~------~------~------~------~------~------~------+80-~eo
C\J
(1/6w)
L() a o
tn c:
0 "';;
CU ~ ... c: G)
CJ c:
0 0
G)
"'C "i:
0
.s:::: 0
(0
I Z s: ~
,...------r------r---...,----r----.,------,------,---...,..-8 ~ -I\BLAJ
~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa=l
o ~ -on'v'
O~-UBr
60-lnr
~-----+------+-----~------+------+------+------+------+Bo-~ao
o co o <.0 o L.{) o C\I o o
,-------r------..,-------,----------,.------r-8 ~ -l\eV\l
In c:
0 .';:; ~ ~-das CO I... ... c: G)
() c: 0 0
G) ... CO I... ~ ~-qa~ .t=
Z ...... I
Z s: ....
o ~-5n\f
o~-uer
I-------t------i-------i------i--------I-60-lnr
C\I LO o o
(1/6w)
~------~-------,--------~--~--~--------~------~8~-AB~
tn ~ ~-das
c:
0 :;: as I-... c:
G)
(J c:
0 ~ ~-qa.::l 0
G)
"C "i:
0
.c: 0
r--.. o ~-5n'V I Z 3: I-
60-lnr
~-------r--------~-------+--------+--------+--------+80-0aa
C\J o co C\J o
0.9
o.S
0.7
0.6 -...I 0,
E 0.5 -
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
o
ex::> o U (1) o
en o ....!... ::l
J
.......... .... .... ..... .... o
T""" I C co J
..... ....
TWN-8 Nitrate Concentrations
TWN-S Nitrate Concentrations are all Non Detect
..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... o
T""" T""" T""" en .6 6.
::l (1) (1) « LL (J)
.... .... .....
C\J
T""" I 10-
....
c.. «
..... .... ~
T
C\J
T""" I t5 o
('t)
T""" >-co ~
U) s:::
0 ~ CO ~ ... s::: CI)
(,) s:::
0 0
CI)
-C ";:
.2 .s::: 0
CO I Z ~ I-
,...----,..----r----,-------,r-----r-----r----.,..----..,.----r----r-8 ~ -1\1311\1
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::l
o ~-5n'v'
~--~-----+-----r----~----+---~r---~-----r----~--__+80-0aa
o C\J C\J o C\J o
~----~------~------~------~------r-----~------~8~-Ae~
o~-uer
~------r-------r-------r-------+-------+-------+-------+80-0ao
C\I o C\I o
U)
s:::::
0
"';:; CU '-...
s::::: CI)
0 s::::: 0 0
CI)
-C ".:
.2
J: 0
0)
I Z
3: I-
r---------~--------~----------~--------~--------~8~-AB~
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa::l
o ~-Bn'v'
~---------+----------4-----------~--------~----------+80-0ao
o l!)
C\J
o o C\J
o l!) o o o l!) o
U) c
0 ;;
CO :to.. ~ C (I)
(.) c
0 0
(I)
~ co :to.. .~
Z
0 ,....
I Z ~ I-
r-----~--~----~----~----~----~----~----~----~8~-Ae~
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:l
o ~ -5nV
o ~-uer
~----+-----~----~----~-----+----~----~------~----+80-0aa
<0 o C\I o o
U)
s:::::
0 .. cu ~ ....
s::::: CI)
(.)
s::::: 0 0
CI)
"C "i:
.2
.s::::: 0
0 ,...
I Z 3: I-
...-------,-----.,.--------r------...,.--------..-----.-8 ~ -ABV\I
~ ~-des
~ ~-qe.::l
o ~ -f3n V
60-lnr
r-------------+---------r-----------+-------~----------~------------------+80-0eo
o <0 o L.() o
C\I o o
tn C o ;:; cu I-... C
CD (J
C o o
CD ... cu I-.t::
Z ,.... ,....
I Z
== I-
C\J
,
'I\~
~ ~
~~
~~
H
~ ~
~ ~
.~
~ ------~ ------
co a
....
~ ~
C\J a
~ ~-das
o ~-5n'v'
o ~-uer
60-lnr
o
o c o
" ..
CO ... ... C CI)
(.)
C o (.)
CI)
'"C "i: o
J: (.) ,... ,...
I Z ~
o 0)
~~
~\
.1
H
I..
)~
o CX)
~~
~
~~
~
o <0 o LO
(1/6w)
o C\I
8 ~ -I\el/\l
~ ~-das
o ~-5n'v'
o ~-uer
o o
U) s::: o
~ C'G Jo.. ... s:::
CI) o s::: o o
CI) ... C'G Jo.. .:t::: Z
C\I or-I
Z
3= I-
....----. ~
~ ....----.
L..----" -'Y
C\I
~~
~ ~
~
" ~ ~-das
~
""'"III
o ~-5n'v'
;~
~
o ~-uer
~
o
fn s:::
0 "';:
C'CS Jo.. ... s:::
Cl)
(J s:::
0 0
Cl)
"'C "i:
.2
~ 0
C\I ,....
I Z 3: I-
r-------~--~--_,--------~------~--------~------_r 8~-AB~
~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa~
o ~-5n'v'
O~-UBr
I------+----+-----+-----+------+------\-60-lnr
o C\J o o o 00 o <0 o C\J o
o c 0 , ;;
CO J.. ....
C CI)
(,)
C o
(.)
CI) .... CO J.. :::
Z
C"') ,....
I
Z ;:
I-
<0 a
~~.
.~ V
C\J a
~
H
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~-das
~
~ ~-qa.::l
o ~-6n'v'
~
o~-uer
o
fn c: 0
~ '" :I.. .... c: Cl)
(J c: 0 0
Cl)
"C .~
0
.c: 0
('I) ,....
I Z 3: -I-
~-------------~--------------------~------------~--------------------~---------------~-----------------~8~-AB~
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa:J
o ~-5n'v'
I------+------I-------+-----+------l------+ 60-lnr
o C\J o o o CX) o C\J o
,.----,...---'T---.,----r-----...,-----...,.---...,----r----...,-8 ~ -ABII\I
en c
0 .. ~ ~-des '" '-... c CI)
(.) c
0 0
CI) ... '" '-.~ ~ ~-qe.:J
Z
~ ,....
I Z
== t-
O ~ -finv
o ~-UBr
l----t----+--.-+---+----1----l----l----j------+ 60-lnr
L() o o
tn c: 0 -..: CO Jo.. .... c:
Cl)
(,) c: o .
0
Cl)
"C "i:
0
.c:
0
III:t ,....
I Z ~ I-
,...-------..,------,.------r-----,....-----r-----,------r 8 ~ -I\BV\I
~ ~-des
~ ~-qe.::J
o~-5nv
1------1-------+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+ 60-lnr
l.{) ('I) o ('I)
l.{)
C\I o C\I
l.{) o o
r--------..------.,-------,--------,.------.-8 ~ -kel!\l
tn
C
0 "';:; ~ ~-des as ... ... c CI)
0 c
0 0
CI) ... as ... "~ ~ ~-qe.:!
Z
II) ,...
I Z ~ t-
O ~ -onv
\.
o~-uer
!-------l------+-------!------!------_+_ 60-lnr
L{) o a
U)
C 0 +: ca J.. .... C (1)
(,) c 0
(.)
(1)
"C ";::
0
J:
(.)
It) ,....
I Z 3= t-
r----,.----.,.----.,.----~--..,..._--_,__--~--_r__--_r 8 ~ -keV\l
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa=:J
o ~-5nv
o ~-uer
1----+----+----+---+----+----+----1----+----1-60-lnr
o 0') o co o <.0 o (Y) o C\J o
r-----r-----r---,...-----r-.---r---r----r------r----r-----,-8 ~ -keV\l
tn r:: 0
~ ~ ~-das C'CS ~ ... r:: G)
(.) r:: 0
0
G) ...
C'CS ~ .~ ~ ~-qa.::l
Z
<0 ,....
I Z
3= t-
O ~-6n'v'
I-----+---+---+-----i---+---I-----+---+----I---+ 60-lnr
L{) o a
f/) c 0 .. cu ... .... c CI)
0 c 0
(.)
CI)
"C ";:
0
.J:
(.)
U)
~ I Z
== t-
,....------,....-----r-----.,..----...,------r-----,--8 ~-kell\l
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa~
O ~-5n'v'
1------+----+-----+-----+-----1------+ 60-lnr
o <.0 o l!) o ('I) o C\J o o
,.------.,...----",....------.,.-----..,.--------,------.-8 ~ -kell\l
tn C 0 ; ~ ~-das cu 10-.. C CI)
(.) c 0 0
CI) .. CU 10-.t: ~ ~-qa=l Z
r--,....
I Z
3: t-
O ~ -5nV
o ~-uer
I------+----+-----+----+-----J.-----+ 60-lnr
C\J o C\J o
U'J c: 0
+:i CO ~ ... c: CI)
0 c: 0 0
CI)
"C "i:
0
.c: 0
I"'-,....
I Z ;:
t-
.----.......------,.----.--------.----.,..------r----,.---...,.-8 ~ -ABI,I\J
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa::l
O ~-5n\f
1-----1------1----1----+---+----1----1-----+ 60-lnr
o <0 o C\I o o o CX) o <0 o
C\I o
In t: 0
~ ~ ... ... t: CI)
(.)
t: 0 0
CI) ... ~ ... :!::
Z
CO ,....
I Z ~ t-
r-------,------r-------r---------,.------r 8 ~-kell\l
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::l
O ~-5n'v'
o~-uer
I-------+------l-------l--------ji------.--+ 60-lnr
C\J L{) o o
0 c:
0 :;:::; as -... c: G)
() c: 0 0
G)
"C ";::
.2
J: 0
CO ,...
I
Z ;::
I-
,..------r------,.---..,...------,----..,.------r-------,---.....-8 ~ -I\BV\I
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa=f
o ~-6n'v'
I-------/-----+----+----+----I------+------ii-----l-60-lnr
o CO o <0 o L() o C\J o o
r----..----..----....-----..,----...----...----...,..----.----r 8 ~ -ke~
~
J
G ~ -JdV
~
U)
C
0 +=i ~ ~-das CU Jo.. ...... c 1 CD 0
C
0 0 ~ CD ...... cu Jo.. :!:: ~ ~-qa::l Z H
0') ,..
I 0 z 3: ~ t-
o ~ -5nv
f
1----+----+----+----I----4----4----+----l----+ 60-lnr
co LO C\l o
tJ) r::: 0 .. CU '-... r:::
G)
(.) r::: 0 0
G)
"C "i:
0
J:
0
en ,..
I
Z ;:
I-
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:J
o ~-5n'v'
!-----+---t----f---t----+---+---+----If----+----t 60-lnr
<.0 C\I C\I C\I o C\I <.0
T"""
T"""
C\I o co o <.0 o
tn t:
0 .';;
CU J.. ... t: (1)
(.)
t:
0 0
(1) ... CU J.. .t:
Z ,...
J.. (1) ... (1)
E 0 N (1)
0::
,..-----:------r-----r-------,------r-----.,----..,...-8 ~ -I\BII\I
~ ~-das
~ ~ -qa.::l
o ~ -onv
O~-UBr
60-lnr
80-0ao
~---------~---------~------+-------+----------+------+-------+80-unr
co cD co cD
tn I:
0 .';;
C'CS '-... I: G)
(J
I: 0 0
G)
"'C . .::::
.2
J: 0 ,...
'-G) ...
G)
E
0 N .!!! c..
~----~--~----~----~----~----~----~----~----~8~-Ae~
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.::l
o ~ -6nv
o ~-uer
60-lnr
~----4-----~-----+----~------+-----~----~-----4------+80-oao
o 0:> o CX) o <.0 o C\I o o
U) s:::
0 ~ ca ~ ... s::: CI)
Co) s:::
0 0
CI) ... ca ~ .-::
Z
C\I
~
CI) ... CI)
E 0 N .!! D..
,--------,---......,.------r------,------r----..,-----r 8 ~ -I\BV\,I
~ ~-d8S
~ ~-q8,:j
o ~-5n'v'
O~-UBr
80<)80
~------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+80-unr
<.0 o L() o ('I') o C\J o a
r----,.-----~--.,....__--_r__--..,_--_:__--_r__--_r__--_r_ 8 ~ -ABII'J
U)
s::::: ~ ~-des 0
"';:;
CO 10. ...
s::::: CI)
(,)
s::::: 0 0
CI) ~ ~-qe~
"'C ";:
0
~ 0
N
10. CI) ... o ~ -onv CI)
E 0 N CI)
0::
o ~-UBr
60-lnr
C\I o to C\I o
tn s::: 0 -..::; cu ... ... s:::
G)
(.) s::: 0
0
G) ... CU ... .t:::
Z
C") ... G) ... G)
E 0 N G) c::
r--------r--------r-------~--------~------~--------~8~-AB~
~ ~-das
~ ~-qa.:l
o ~ -5nV
O~-UBr
60-lnr
80-~aa
r--------+--------~--------~-------+--------~--------+80-Unr
C\I
r
LO o o
t/) t: 0
"';:;
CO Jo... ... t: CI)
(.) t: 0
0
CI)
"C
";::
..2 .t:
0
('I)
Jo... CI) ... CI)
E 0 N .!!! a.
~----~~----~------~------~------~------~------~8~-AB~
~ ~-des
~ ~-qe=l
o ~-5n'v'
o ~-UBr
~------r-------r-------r-------r-------r-------r-------+Bo-~ea
o C\J o o o CO o <0 o C\J o
In
s:::::
0 .';;
C'CS 10.. ... s::::: CI)
(.)
s:::::
0 0
CI) ...
C'CS 10.. .'!:::
Z
~
10.. CI) ... CI)
E 0 N .!! a..
r-----r----,----r----..,....-----,~-__r_--__r_--_.__--....__-_._ 60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-l nr
60-l nr
f-----t-----j----t---+--___ r----+---+----l---+--__+_ 60-lnr
C\J co o CD o C\J o o
tn
C
0 -..:: as i.. ... C
(1)
(J c
0 (.)
(1)
"C ";:
0
J: (.)
~
i.. (1) ... (1)
E
0 N "~ C.
r-------,..----,----.,..-----,.----r---..,...----r----.,...---r------r-60-lnr
•
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
i------+----+----I---+---I-----!-----1-----l----I---___!_ 60-ln r
o L()
L()
('f) o C\J
L() o L() o
tn C 0 +:i CO Jo.. ..... C CI)
0 c
0 0
CI) ..... co Jo.. .t::
Z
Lt)
Jo.. CI) ..... CI)
E 0 N CI)
ii:
,..-----,----;----...,..------,r----r------,.----r-----r-60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
l------!----r----f-----1r----f-----f-----1----+ 60-lnr
co a <0 a LO a C\I o a
U)
C 0 ..
CU '-.... C CI)
(,) c 0 0
CI)
"'C "i:
0
.c 0
Lt)
'-CI) .... CI)
E 0 N "~ a..
,.-----.,..----.,.----,----.,----..,-----r----.,.....--,.,---.,----r 60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
1----+---+----+----I------1I----+----+----+---+-----/-60-l nr
o C\J <0 C\J o <0 C\J o
0) a C\I a
~~
o
60-lnr
60-l nr
60-l nr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
f/)
t: o "+=i cu Jo.. ... t:
CD (,)
t: o (J
CD "'C ";: o
.c:
(J
eX) ,....
I
== :E
o <.0
•
o L!)
II.'
o C\I
60-l nr
60-l nr
60-l nr
60-l nr
60-lnr
60-lnr
60-lnr
o o
,..-------,-------.,..------..,..----_r-----...... 60-lnr
• 60-l nr
60-lnr
60-l nr
U)
C
0 +=i ca 60-l nr ~ ..,
C (1)
(,) c
0 (.)
(1) .., 60-lnr ca ~ .-:: z
0) ,....
I 3: 2 60-lnr
1-------+-----+-------+------+------+ 60-lnr
C\I o
(1/6w)
tJ) c:: 0 .. CO I.. ... c::
Cl)
(,) c::
0 0
Cl)
-C "i:
0
.c:: 0
Q) ,....
I 3: ~
,..-------r-----....,..-----.,------r------r--------r 60-lnr
•
60-lnr
60-l nr
60-lnr
60-l nr
60-l nr
60-l nr
60-l nr
1------+-----!-----!-------+-----4----__+_ 60-lnr
o Ct) I.{)
C\I o C\I o o
tn . c: o "';:;
C'CS ~ ... c:
G)
(J c: o o
G) ...
C'CS ~ .:t:: Z
" c: o a.
G) :!::
:2
i
C\J
ci
4~ ~
co o
ci
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~~
C\J o
ci
.......
~ ~
H
~ ~
~ ~
o
~ ~-das
~~-unr
~ ~-qa.::l
o ~-l\oN
o ~-5n'v'
o ~ -ABV\j
O~-UBr
60-PO
r-------,.....-----r-----,--.----;-.----~---__r_ G~-Jd'v'
~ ~-oao
~ ~-das
tn s:: ~ ~-unr 0
';
C'CS I-... s:: e» (J s:: 0 ~ ~-qa::l
(.)
e» "'C
".:::: .2 .s::
(.) o ~-J\oN
"'C s:: 0 c..
e» ~
:E o ~-5n'v'
~
l-e» Q. Q.
~ o ~-keV\l
60-lO0
I-------!-----+-----+----+------+-----+ 60-lnr
<0 ('I') o
(1/6w)
en
s::::: o ~ '" ... ~
s::::: CI)
(.)
s::::: o o
CI)
~ '" ... :!::
Z
"C
s::::: o c..
tn o ... u.
0')
c:i
ex::>
c:i C\I c:i
~~
o
60-J\ON
60-PO
60-deS
60-deS
60-0nV
60-l nr
(/) c: o .. ca J. ... c:
CI)
(.) c: o
(.)
CI)
"C "i:
.2 J:
(.)
"C c: o D..
C) o J. LL
0'> o CD o <0 o C\I o
~~
o o
60-/\ON
60-PO
60-deS
60-deS
60-5n V
60-lnr
TabL
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Monday, February 25, 2013 7:38 AM
'rlundberg@ utah.gov'
'Phillip Goble'; Thomas Rushing'; Harold Roberts; David Frydenlund; Jo Ann Tischler; Jaime
Massey; David Turk; Garrin Palmer; N. Tanner Holliday
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2012 Q4 Nitrate Monitoring
1210325-EDD-rev1.csv
Attached to this e-mail are electronic copies of laboratory results for nitrate monitoring conducted at the White Mesa
Mill during the fourth quarter of 2012, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
1