Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSHW-2024-005821Dennis R. Downs, SQG Program P. O. Box 144880 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 August 5, 1999 Dear Mr. Downs: P.O.Box lll4 SLC, Utah 84110 (801)355-6e35 www.redhanger.com brado@redhanger.com Brad Overmoe Presid.ent This letter is in response to a site inspection that was performed at our Red Hanger store #11 located at 265 South 400 East in Salt Lake. The inspection was performed on July 7, 1999 by Ed Deputy. The following is required response information fio1 Red Hanger Cleaners: 1) Why are F002 and D039 both listed on the Land Ban form but only F002 is listed on the yellow manifest forms? 2) What is maintenance doing with old light bulbs? Answers as follows: 1) ! contacted my waste hauler, AAD, to get information on this topic. Please see the enclosed letter from their legal firm explaining the meaning of the codes. Essentially, they indicab that the two codes are for the same waste, namely, perchloroethylene and not that two difbrent types of wastes are being picked up from our stores. Red Hanger Cleaners only has one type of waste which is hauled and that is perc in the still residues that we generate. 2) The maintenance department is cunently disposing of old light bulbs in our garbage dumpsters. Red Hanger Cleaners has been using only the green tipped light bulbs for several years now. Please let me know if you require any more information. I can be reached at 355-6935. Sincerely, Brad J. President Red Hanger Cleaners Sent BY: MOSKOWITZ BRESTOFF WINST l. , T AL;310 318+9591;Aug-5-99 10 o : 53;ONE o MOSKOWITZ' BNESIIOFF, VINSI1DN ff BLINDEBMAN 41r* I EEO century Park East, suitc 350, Los Angslcs, califomiu 9006? TEL: (310) 373.9790 FAX: (310) 373-Wl5 E-MntL: jsrn@ix.nstcom.com AuS..st 5, 1999 Brad Overrnore A€d Hanger Cleaners 536 S. 200 Weet Salt Lake City, Utah 94101 Re: Manifest Waste Numbers Dear Mr. Overmore: I have been asked to write to you by my client, AAD Disposal Co. ('AAD") concerning the waste identification on the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifests used by AAD. I understand that the waste is identified as "RQ, Waste Tetrachloroethlyene, 6.1 UN 189? PGIII" and is further identifred by its EPA waste number F002. This same waste is identified by EPA as DO39. AAD had previously ueed both numbers otr the land disposal notifi.cation form, and has now commenced putting the latter number on the manifests as well under'Additional Descriptions-" For earlier manifests, the waste was neverthelees accurately described. I hope that this clarifres the situation. I S. Moskowit nrh:JSM cc:HormozPourat Page 1 JoeI S. Moskouitz DU{Ecr rBL (3t0i 3r t-95?8 Brhm $ Blindarnan Ncls*r E Brc*off Eerry A Crordcrna f,<rck Honlcrn' Dennis A Winnon 'of ot;tlsEl r A IJMTTBD IJABILTTY PARTTIEESIIIP INCLUDINO BilTSTloFT & TtINSlCIN, A PBOFESSIONAL COBPOILTTION