HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSHW-2024-005821Dennis R. Downs,
SQG Program
P. O. Box 144880
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
August 5, 1999
Dear Mr. Downs:
P.O.Box lll4
SLC, Utah 84110
(801)355-6e35
www.redhanger.com
brado@redhanger.com
Brad Overmoe
Presid.ent
This letter is in response to a site inspection that was performed at our Red
Hanger store #11 located at 265 South 400 East in Salt Lake. The inspection
was performed on July 7, 1999 by Ed Deputy. The following is required
response information fio1 Red Hanger Cleaners:
1) Why are F002 and D039 both listed on the Land Ban form but only F002 is
listed on the yellow manifest forms?
2) What is maintenance doing with old light bulbs?
Answers as follows:
1) ! contacted my waste hauler, AAD, to get information on this topic. Please
see the enclosed letter from their legal firm explaining the meaning of the
codes. Essentially, they indicab that the two codes are for the same waste,
namely, perchloroethylene and not that two difbrent types of wastes are
being picked up from our stores. Red Hanger Cleaners only has one type of
waste which is hauled and that is perc in the still residues that we generate.
2) The maintenance department is cunently disposing of old light bulbs in our
garbage dumpsters. Red Hanger Cleaners has been using only the green
tipped light bulbs for several years now.
Please let me know if you require any more information. I can be reached at
355-6935.
Sincerely,
Brad J.
President
Red Hanger Cleaners
Sent BY: MOSKOWITZ BRESTOFF WINST
l.
,
T AL;310 318+9591;Aug-5-99 10
o
: 53;ONE
o
MOSKOWITZ' BNESIIOFF, VINSI1DN ff BLINDEBMAN 41r*
I EEO century Park East, suitc 350, Los Angslcs, califomiu 9006?
TEL: (310) 373.9790 FAX: (310) 373-Wl5 E-MntL: jsrn@ix.nstcom.com
AuS..st 5, 1999
Brad Overrnore
A€d Hanger Cleaners
536 S. 200 Weet
Salt Lake City, Utah 94101
Re: Manifest Waste Numbers
Dear Mr. Overmore:
I have been asked to write to you by my client, AAD Disposal Co. ('AAD")
concerning the waste identification on the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifests
used by AAD.
I understand that the waste is identified as "RQ, Waste Tetrachloroethlyene,
6.1 UN 189? PGIII" and is further identifred by its EPA waste number F002.
This same waste is identified by EPA as DO39. AAD had previously ueed
both numbers otr the land disposal notifi.cation form, and has now commenced
putting the latter number on the manifests as well under'Additional Descriptions-"
For earlier manifests, the waste was neverthelees accurately described.
I hope that this clarifres the situation.
I S. Moskowit
nrh:JSM
cc:HormozPourat
Page 1
JoeI S. Moskouitz
DU{Ecr rBL (3t0i 3r t-95?8
Brhm $ Blindarnan
Ncls*r E Brc*off
Eerry A Crordcrna
f,<rck Honlcrn'
Dennis A Winnon
'of ot;tlsEl
r A IJMTTBD IJABILTTY PARTTIEESIIIP INCLUDINO BilTSTloFT & TtINSlCIN, A PBOFESSIONAL COBPOILTTION