The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDERR-2025-006030 IIHHII E N V I R O N M E N T A L ASBESTOS SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT Former Salt Lake City Maintenance Fleet Yard 800 South 350 West Salt Lake City, Utah June 12, 2012 Submitted To: Ms. Renee Zollinger, Environmental Manager Salt Lake City Corporation P.O. Box 145467 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5467 Prepared By: IHI Environmental 640 East Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah 84106 IHI Project 12U-A1075 640 EAST WILMINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 TELEPHONE: 801-466-2223 FAX: 801-466-9616 E-MAIL: IHI@IHI-ENV.COM SALT LAKE CITY SAN FRANCISCO PHOENIX DENVER SEATTLE Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................1 2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION ..........................................................................................2 3.0 SURVEY PROCEDURES .............................................................................................3 3.1 Building Survey .................................................................................................3 3.2 Bulk Sample Collection .....................................................................................3 3.3 Bulk Sample Analysis ........................................................................................4 4.0 SURVEY RESULTS ....................................................................................................4 4.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials ..........................................................................4 4.2 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials ..................................................................5 4.3 Bulk Sample Analytical Results ........................................................................5 4.4 Damage and Hazard Assessment .......................................................................5 4.5 Homogeneous Areas with Special Considerations ............................................7 4.6 Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials .........................................................7 4.7 Inaccessible Areas. .............................................................................................7 4.8 Material(s) assumed to contain >1.0% asbestos ................................................7 5.0 RESPONSE ACTION COMMENTS ..............................................................................7 5.1 EPA Requirements .............................................................................................7 5.2 OSHA Requirements .........................................................................................8 5.3 Demolition Options ............................................................................................9 6.0 COST ESTIMATES ..................................................................................................10 7.0 LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF WARRANTY ..................................................11 APPENDICES A Data Tables Table 1 - Asbestos-Containing Materials Table 2 - Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials Table 3 - Bulk Sample Analytical Results Sorted by Sample Number Table 4 - Bulk Sample Analytical Results Sorted by Homogeneous Area Number Table 5 - Damage and Hazard Assessment Table 6 - Estimated Abatement Costs by Homogeneous Area B Building Floor Plans C Laboratory Analytical Reports EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An asbestos survey was completed at the subject facilities between May 9 and May 11, 2012. Bulk samples were collected from suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and analyzed to determine if they contained asbestos. This survey was requested by Ms. Renee Zollinger, Environmental Manager for Salt Lake City Corporation. For a description of this facility, please refer to Section 2.0 (Building Description). Amounts of ACMs identified in this survey and estimated removal costs for these materials by a certified asbestos abatement contractor are presented in the following Executive Summary table in Appendix A. In the Material Description and Location column, the notation “GDC” refers to glued-down carpet. The cost estimates in this table include only asbestos removal costs; abatement design and management fees are not included. The estimated removal cost for all of the ACMs in the former Salt Lake City Maintenance Fleet Yard is $48,857.00. There is important information contained in the body and appendices of this report that is not included in this Executive Summary. This report should be read in its entirety, including detailed information that is contained in other sections and appendices. Note: The estimated removal cost does not include the abatement of materials not identified during the survey that may have been located in inaccessible areas (above ceilings and/or behind walls). Asbestos Survey ES-1 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 Executive Summary Asbestos-containing Materials by Homogeneous Area SLC Corp SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard Homogeneous Area Number Material Description/Location Asbestos Content Amount Cost Estimate(1) M008 8% 10% 1 unitsChrysotile (1st layer) Chrysotile (2nd layer) Various locations (refer to drawings for locations) Sink Undercoat - White in color $73 M010 >1%512 sq. ft.Chrysotile (mastic) ND floor tile) Entry area of fleet management offices Floor Tile - Exposed - 12", Gray in color $1,208 M011 >1% 8% 80 sq. ft.Chrysotile (mastic) Chrysotile (floor tile) Building #5, fleet management offices entry way & restrooms Floor Tile - Exposed - 12", Beige w/ tan pattern $189 M019 >1%128 sq. ft.Chrysotile (mastic) ND (floor tile) Building #6, South end, foyer (refer to drawings for locations) Floor Tile - Exposed - 12", Tan w/ brown streaks $302 M020 >1% 5% 4,640 sq. ft.Chrysotile (mastic) Chrysotile (floor tile) Building #6, throughout south end offices (refer to drawings for locations) Floor Tile and Mastic Under GDC - 9", white w/ blue streaks $22,411 M022 8%12,290 sq. ft.Chrysotile Various areas (refer to drawings for locations) Roofing Sealant (Seams) - Black in color $24,580 T001 1.2%5 fittingsChrysotile Various areas (refer to drawings for locations) Pipe fittings, small/each - Pipe fitting insulation, small $93 Cost Estimates include asbestos removal costs only; abatement design, management fees and replacement costs are not included. Please refer to Section 6.0 for more details. Note 1: Executive Summary Table SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard SLC Corp Page 1 of 1 ASBESTOS SURVEY Former Salt Lake City Maintenance Fleet Yard 1.0 INTRODUCTION An asbestos survey was conducted at the subject facility between May 9 and May 11, 2012. The purpose of this survey was to identify the existence, extent, and condition of both friable and non-friable ACM in the building prior to renovation and prepare a comprehensive report. Bulk samples were collected from suspect materials and analyzed for asbestos content. Each occurrence of ACM was assessed for friability. The following accredited inspector performed the inspection, collected the samples, and made the assessments: May 29, 2012 Todd Maresca Date Utah DAQ Asbestos Inspector No. ASB-2957 This report was reviewed by: May 29, 2012 Jon H. Self Date Program Manager Asbestos Survey 1 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION Building Identification Building Name ............................. Former SLC Maintenance Fleet Yard Building Address ........................ 800 South 350 West Salt Lake City, Utah Building Construction Building Construction Date ......... Unknown Building Type ............................. Maintenance Yard Building(s) Total Sq. Ft. .............. ~98,139 sq. ft. (All 6 buildings combined) Structural System ........................ Concrete and steel Exterior Wall Construction ......... Block, concrete Floor Deck Construction ............. Concrete Roof Deck Construction ............. Concrete Roof Construction ....................... Built-up roofing and rolled sheeting Floors Floors Above Grade .................... 1 Floors Below Grade .................... None Interior Finishes Floors ..........................................Vinyl floor tile, glued-down carpet, and concrete Walls ........................................... Concrete, block, drywall system, wood paneling Ceilings ....................................... Sprayed-on texturing, plaster, gypsum board, ceiling tile, wood paneling and concrete Attic ............................................. None Basement ..................................... N/A Building Mechanical Heating Plant ............................... Electrical Main Heating Distribution: .......... Radiant Cooling Plant ............................... Roof and ground-mounted HVAC units, evaporative coolers Main A/C Distribution ................. Ducting and direct Asbestos Survey 2 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 3.0 SURVEY PROCEDURES 3.1 Building Survey All accessible areas of the facility were visually inspected to identify suspect asbestos- containing materials. All accessible surfaces, structures, and mechanical systems within these areas were examined, and all suspected ACM was touched to determine friability. Suspect ACM was identified and assessed in homogeneous areas. A homogeneous area is defined as a single material, uniform in texture and appearance, installed at one time, and unlikely to consist of more than one type, or formulation, of material. In cases where joint compound and/or tape has been applied to wallboard (gypsum board) and cannot be visually distinguished from the wallboard, it is considered an integral part of the wallboard and in effect becomes one material forming a wall or ceiling “system.” Each homogeneous area was given a unique material identification (ID) number. Each ID number begins with a letter: “S” for surfacing materials, “T” for thermal system insulation, or “M" for miscellaneous materials. This letter is followed by a three-digit number, assigned in consecutive order. This number is used to identify the homogeneous area throughout the inspection report. 3.2 Bulk Sample Collection Bulk samples were collected from all accessible homogeneous areas of suspect ACM for subsequent laboratory analysis to determine actual asbestos content. Thirty-six samples were collected on this survey. Sampling was conducted in a manner that minimized damage to the building, did not leave unsightly marks, and did not create a health hazard for the inspectors. The number of samples collected from each homogeneous area generally followed the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §763.86). Friable surfacing materials were sampled using the random sampling scheme given in the EPA publication 560/5-85-030a, titled ”Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme for Friable Surfacing Materials.” Bulk sample IDs collected during the survey were entered on chain- of-custody forms for submittal to the analytical laboratory. Asbestos Survey 3 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 3.3 Bulk Sample Analysis Bulk samples were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM) and visual estimation in accordance with the EPA Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples, EPA-600/M4-82-020. Samples were analyzed by Dixon Information Inc. Salt Lake City, Utah. Dixon Information is accredited under the National Institute of Standards and Technology - National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NIST- NVLAP) for bulk asbestos sample analysis and is also accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA.) EPA’s National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and AHERA regulations define ACM as material containing greater than 1% asbestos by weight; materials containing 1% or less asbestos are not considered regulated ACM. Further, the NESHAP regulations state that any sample found to contain less than 10% asbestos but greater than “none detected,” by visual estimation, must be assumed to contain greater than 1% asbestos unless confirmed to be 1.0% or less asbestos by point counting analysis. All samples found to contain asbestos in this concentration range were assumed in this report to contain greater than 1% asbestos. The laboratory reports can be found in Appendix C of this report. 4.0 SURVEY RESULTS 4.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials Homogeneous areas of suspect ACM are identified as being ACM if the laboratory analysis shows the material to contain any detectable asbestos, unless subsequent point count analysis resulted in 1.0% or less asbestos being detected. The Executive Summary and Table 1 in Appendix A list all homogeneous areas that were found to be ACM. Each material is described by type of material, friability and visual appearance. Friability is defined in accordance with EPA’s NESHAP regulations. “Friable ACM” is any material containing more than 1% asbestos (as determined by PLM) that, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure and also includes non-friable ACM that may become friable during building demolition. Asbestos Survey 4 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 “Non-friable ACM” is any material containing more than 1% asbestos (as determined by PLM) that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. “Category I non-friable ACM” are asbestos-containing resilient floor coverings (commonly known as vinyl asbestos tile (VAT)), asphalt roofing products, packings, and gaskets. “Category II non-friable ACM” encompasses all other non-friable ACM. “Non-friable RACM” is used to denote thermal system insulation that is in good condition but would become friable during renovation or demolition and therefore is “regulated asbestos-containing material” (RACM). 4.2 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials Homogeneous areas of suspect ACM are identified as non-ACM if the laboratory analysis shows the material to contain no detectable asbestos. Table 2, located in Appendix A of this report, lists all homogeneous areas that were found to be non-ACM. 4.3 Bulk Sample Analytical Results Table 3, located in Appendix A of this report, lists all the bulk samples (in order by sample number) collected from homogeneous areas of suspect ACM, and the laboratory analytical results. Each sample was given a unique sample number. There may be more than one sample number for the same homogeneous area of suspect ACM indicating multiple samples were collected from that homogeneous material. The homogeneous areas of suspect ACM are identified on this table by their material identification numbers. The sample location listed on this table provides a brief, but specific, description of the location where the sample was collected. This is different from the homogeneous area location provided on Tables 1 and 2. Table 4 is the same as Table 3, except that the entries have been sorted by homogeneous area number. 4.4 Damage and Hazard Assessment Each homogeneous area of ACM was assessed for existing damage, accessibility, and potential for future damage, and this information is presented in Table 5, located in Appendix A of this report. This table also lists the substrate beneath each homogeneous area of ACM. Asbestos Survey 5 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 Each homogeneous area of ACM and asbestos-containing building material (ACBM) was classified into one of the following seven categories, as specified in EPA’s AHERA regulations (40 CFR §763.88): (1) Damaged or significantly damaged thermal system insulation ACM. (2) Damaged friable surfacing ACM. (3) Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM. (4) Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM. (5) ACBM with potential for damage. (6) ACBM with potential for significant damage. (7) Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspected ACBM. (X) Not applicable (material is non-friable). The damage categories are defined as follows: "Undamaged" means the material had no visible damage, or extremely minor damage or surface marring (i.e., a room full of floor tile with only two or three small corners chipped off of the tile). "Slight Damage" means the material had visible damage evenly distributed over less than 10% of its surface, or localized over less than 25% of its surface. "Significantly Damaged" means the material had visible damage that is evenly distributed over 10% or more of its surface, or localized over 25% or more of its surface. Each homogeneous area of ACM was evaluated for accessibility to the building occupants and the general public, assuming the building was fully occupied, using the following assessment categories. “Inaccessible” means the material was located in an area that people had no reason to enter and could not access without special measures. One example would be above a solid ceiling. “Rarely-Accessed” identifies a material that was in a location that could be accessed but wasn't unless there was a specific need. An example would be a pipe tunnel. Another example would be a high ceiling that is out of reach and not subject to any specific disturbances. “Periodic Access” identifies a material that was in a location that was accessible, was not occupied full time, but was accessed on a routine basis. An example would be a mechanical room or boiler room. “Continuous Access” identifies a material that was in a location that was occupied full time and was within reach of the occupants, or was frequently subject to Asbestos Survey 6 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 direct disturbance. Examples would be exposed floor tile or a normal height ceiling. 4.5 Homogeneous Areas with Special Considerations None 4.6 Assumed Asbestos-Containing Materials 4.7 Inaccessible Areas Tenant space in Building #1, storage facility in Building #2 and Building #7 (SWAT Team storage) 4.8 Material(s) assumed to contain greater than (>) 1.0% asbestos without subsequent TEM or Point Count Analysis 5.0 RESPONSE ACTION COMMENTS 5.1 EPA Requirements The EPA, under the authority of the Clean Air Act, regulates asbestos as a hazardous air pollutant. ACM is defined by the EPA, as any material containing greater than one percent of asbestos. The asbestos regulations are included in the NESHAPs and are referenced as 40 CFR 61, Subpart M. ACMs identified in this report are subject to those regulations. Those regulations, and state and local regulations, should be carefully examined prior to renovation, demolition, cleanup, or any other activity, which could disturb the ACMs, to ensure that all activities are in compliance with applicable requirements. Not all ACMs are regulated under the NESHAP. RACM means: (a) Friable asbestos material, (b) Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or d) Category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of regulated demolition or renovation operations. Asbestos Survey 7 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 Regulated demolition and renovation operations are those where the quantity of ACM affected is 260 linear feet or more on pipes, 160 square feet or more on other components, or 35 cubic feet or more in volume. There are certain notification requirements for demolition projects involving less than the above quantities. Briefly, the EPA requires that RACM be removed from facilities scheduled for demolition or renovation before any activity begins that would break up, dislodge, or similarly disturb the materials or preclude access to the materials for subsequent removal. Category I non-friable ACM that is not in poor condition and is not friable does not have to be removed prior to demolition of a facility. However, these materials are exempt from mandatory removal only during demolition, not renovation. Removal is mandated when renovation activities are expected to disturb these ACMs and render them friable. Additionally, Category I non-friable ACM that has not become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder during demolition activities may be disposed of as ordinary construction waste. Category II non-friable ACM also does not have to be removed prior to demolition if the probability is low that the material will become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder (made friable) during demolition. However, state regulations may require the removal of these materials. In any situation where ACM remains in a building, it should be managed under a comprehensive operations and maintenance program (O&M). The procedures and guidelines described in an O&M program should be followed whenever building maintenance activities may disturb any ACMs present in the building. 5.2 OSHA Requirements The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) General Industry Regulation and Construction Industry Regulation, (29 CFR 1910.1001) and (CFR 1926.1101) respectively, define an asbestos-containing material as any material containing more than 1% asbestos. However, unlike the EPA and Utah Division of Air Quality Asbestos Regulations that apply only when concentrations exceed 1% asbestos, certain OSHA regulations and requirements are applicable whenever the concentration of asbestos in a material is greater than “None detected.” Furthermore, in the analysis of asbestos layered materials, such as gypsum board wall systems, EPA recommends combining the layers into a single composite sample. Under the EPA composite sample procedure the “overall” wall Asbestos Survey 8 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 system asbestos concentration will seldom if ever exceed 1% as long as the sample is representative of the entire wall system and the only asbestos is in the joint compound layer. As long as the overall asbestos concentration in a gypsum board wall system does not exceed 1%, EPA considers disturbance of this material to be an unregulated activity. Note: If the joint compound contains more than 1% asbestos and covers all or most of the wall system surface, it is then considered a surfacing material and not part of the wall system and is regulated under EPA guidelines. In contrast to the EPA recommendation to combine layers into a single sample, OSHA directs that each layer of the sample be analyzed independently and treated as a separate material. Consequently, even when only the joint compound layer in a gypsum board wall system contains asbestos in any concentration, specific OSHA-mandated work practices and precautions are required depending on the concentration of asbestos and the extent of joint compound on the wall system surface. The requirements are as follows: • If a >1% asbestos joint compound layer of a gypsum board wall system is the only asbestos in the wall system and the joint compound layer covers more than just joints and nail holes, a disturbance of this material is OSHA Class I Asbestos Work. and the employer must follow the work practices set forth in 29 CFR 1926.1101(g) (1) (2) (4) and (5) • If a >1% asbestos joint compound layer of a gypsum board wall system is the only asbestos in the wall system and the joint compound layer covers only the joints and nail holes, a disturbance of this material is an OSHA Class II Asbestos Work and the employer must follow the work practices set forth in 29 CFR 1926.1101(g) (7) and the relevant work practice and engineering control requirements and prohibitions contained elsewhere in the standard under 29 CFR 1926.1101(g). • If a >None Detected but equal to or less than 1% asbestos joint compound layer of a gypsum board wall system is the only asbestos in the wall system, a disturbance of this material is considered OSHA Unclassified Asbestos Work and the employer must follow 29 CFR 1926.1101(g) (1) (ii) and (iii) and 29 CFR 1926.1101(g) (3) (i), (ii), and (iv) procedures and general prohibitions. 5.3 Renovation Options A listing of asbestos-containing materials found during this survey is presented in the Executive Summary and in Appendix A, Table 1. The pipe-fitting insulation in these facilities is classified as friable ACMs. Non-friable ACMs identified in the building included floor tiles, sink undercoating and roofing tar sealants. NESHAP regulations require the removal of friable ACM and non-friable ACM that could become friable during renovation or demolition activities. Therefore, we Asbestos Survey 9 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 recommend that all of the ACMs in this building be removed and properly disposed of by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor before beginning renovation or demolition activities with the potential of disturbing areas where these materials are located. While this recommendation may be overly conservative from an EPA perspective, it conforms to the OSHA Construction Industry Asbestos Standard (29 CFR 1926.1101) and will help protect workers on the site from potential asbestos exposure and the Owner from liability exposure. An appropriate asbestos abatement design should be prepared by an individual accredited by EPA and the State of Utah as an AHERA Management Planner and Project Designer. Monitoring of the work area should be performed by an independent third-party and abatement areas should be subjected to an independent final inspection by an AHERA- certified professional. 6.0 COST ESTIMATES A breakdown of the estimated removal costs by homogeneous area can be found in Table 6, Appendix A and the Executive Summary table. These cost estimates are provided for use in long-term budgeting and planning only, and do not have a level of accuracy sufficient to be used as a construction design cost estimate. The actual cost of asbestos removal is highly dependent on a number of factors such as the size of the job, the required time frame for removal, the time of year the job is conducted, the regulatory climate at the time, etc.; therefore, actual abatement costs could vary significantly from these estimates. Replacement costs have not been included in these figures. The cost for abatement design and management services is not included in these figures. These additional fees can range from 15% of the estimated abatement costs for large projects to greater than 50% for very small projects. The design and management fees also cover the cost of preparing plans and specifications and conducting the bidding process. Asbestos Survey 10 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 Asbestos Survey 11 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 7.0 LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSION OF WARRANTY This asbestos survey and assessment was performed using procedures and a level of diligence typically exercised by professional consultants performing similar services. However, ACM can be present in a structure, but not identified using ordinary investigative procedures. No asbestos survey can completely eliminate uncertainty regarding the presence of ACM. IHI’s level of diligence and investigative procedures are intended to reduce, but not eliminate, potential uncertainty regarding the presence of ACM. The procedures used for this survey attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative costs, time, and building damage, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, the determinations in this report should not be construed as a guarantee that all ACM present in the subject property has been included in this report. This report presents IHI’s professional determinations, which are dependent upon information obtained during performance of consulting services. IHI assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information provided by sources outside of IHI. No warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, is made regarding the findings, conclusions, or recommendations contained in this report. The limitations presented above supersede the requirements or provisions of all other contracts or scopes of work, implied or otherwise, except those stated or acknowledged herein. Appendix A Data Tables Table 1 Asbestos-containing Materials by Homogeneous Area SLC Corp SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard Homogeneous Area Number Material Description/Location Asbestos Content AmountFriability M008 White in color Various locations (refer to drawings for locations) 8% 10% 1Category 2 Non-friable Sink Undercoat unitsChrysotile (1st layer) Chrysotile (2nd layer) M010 12", Gray in color Entry area of fleet management offices >1%512Category 1 Non-friable On cement substrate. Floor Tile - Exposed sq. ft.Chrysotile (mastic) ND floor tile) M011 12", Beige w/ tan pattern Building #5, fleet management offices entry way & restrooms >1% 8% 80Category 1 Non-friable Located in restrooms. Floor Tile - Exposed sq. ft.Chrysotile (mastic) Chrysotile (floor tile) M019 12", Tan w/ brown streaks Building #6, South end, foyer (refer to drawings for locations) >1%128Category 1 Non-friable Floor Tile - Exposed sq. ft.Chrysotile (mastic) ND (floor tile) M020 9", white w/ blue streaks Building #6, throughout south end offices (refer to drawings for locations) >1% 5% 4,640Category 1 Non-friable Floor tile and mastic are under glued down carpet throughout area. Refer to drawings. Floor Tile and Mastic Under GDC sq. ft.Chrysotile (mastic) Chrysotile (floor tile) M022 Black in color Various areas (refer to drawings for locations) 8%12,290Category 2 Non-friable Sealant is only on seems of roof sheeting (M021). Roofing Sealant (Seams)sq. ft.Chrysotile Asbestos Survey Report - Table 1 SLC Corp Former Fleet YardPage 1 of 2 SLC Corp Note: A homogeneous area of suspect material is considered an Asbestos-containing Material (ACM) if any one sample contains greater than 1% asbesto Homogeneous Area Number Material Description/Location Asbestos Content AmountFriability T001 Pipe fitting insulation, small Various areas (refer to drawings for locations) 1.2%5Friable In buildings 1 & 6 (refer to drawings). Pipe fittings, small/each fittingsChrysotile Asbestos Survey Report - Table 1 SLC Corp Former Fleet YardPage 2 of 2 SLC Corp Note: A homogeneous area of suspect material is considered an Asbestos-containing Material (ACM) if any one sample contains greater than 1% asbesto Table 2 Homogeneous Areas That Do Not Contain Asbestos SLC Corp SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard Material DescriptionHomogeneous Area Number Material Description/Location Amount M001 3", brown in color Building #1, Bay #3 90 ln. ft.Cove Base M002 Gypsum board Various areas throughout properties 7,836 sq. ft.Wall System M003 12", off white w/ gray pattern Building #1, Bay #7 360 sq. ft.Floor Tile - Exposed M004 2'x4', Random worm & hole pattern Various areas (refer to drawings for locations) 637 sq. ft.Ceiling Tile M005 3", gray Various areas (refer to drawings for locations) 72 ln. ft.Cove Base M006 White in color Various areas (refer to drawings for locations) 7,836 sq. ft.Tape/Joint Compound M007 12", Beige in color Various areas (refer to drawings for locations) 90 sq. ft.Floor Tile - Exposed M009 2'x4', white, random hole pattern Building #4 (refer to drawings for locations) 421 sq. ft.Ceiling Tile Asbestos Survey Report - Table 2 Page 1 of 3 SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard SLC Corp Material DescriptionHomogeneous Area Number Material Description/Location Amount M012 2'x4', white w/ large & small hole pattern Building #6, breakroom area, upper level, north end of building 68 sq. ft.Ceiling Tile M013 12", gray in color w/ dark gray pattern Building #6, breakroom area, upper level, north end of building 104 sq. ft.Floor Tile - Exposed M014 12", gray in color w/ black & white pattern Building #6, office areas (refer to drawings for locations) 836 sq. ft.Floor Tile - Exposed M015 12", beige w/ gray streaks Parts department (refer to drawings for locations) 100 sq. ft.Floor Tile - Exposed M016 12", Dark gray w/ black & white flakes Building #6, parts department (refer to drawings for locations) 600 sq. ft.Floor Tile - Exposed M017 12", Light gray w/ white flakes Building #6, parts department (refer to drawings for locations) 600 sq. ft.Floor Tile - Exposed M018 12", Black w/ white flakes Building #6, break room area (refer to drawings for locations) 80 sq. ft.Floor Tile - Exposed M021 White in color Various areas (refer to drawings for locations) 12,290 sq. ft.Roof Sheeting Asbestos Survey Report - Table 2 Page 2 of 3 SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard SLC Corp Material DescriptionHomogeneous Area Number Material Description/Location Amount M023 Built up roofing material, gravel, tar & felt Various areas (refer to drawings for locations) 86,640 sq. ft. Buildings 1, 5, 6 and 7 Built-up Roofs, single layer/sq.ft M024 Sealant, gray in color Various areas (refer to drawings for locations) 2,482 sq. ft.Roof Sealant M025 Black in color Various areas (refer to drawings for locations) 640 ln. ft.Roof Sealant S001 Knockdown texturing Various areas (refer to drawings for locations) 128 sq. ft. Restroom in bay #7, building #1. Surfacing Material Asbestos Survey Report - Table 2 Page 3 of 3 SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard SLC Corp Table 3 Bulk Sample Analytical Results by Sample Number SLC Corp SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard Homogeneous Area Number Material Sampled Analytical ResultsSample Number Sample Location 1075-01 M001 Building #1, Bay #3 NDCove Base 1075-02 M002 Building #1, Bay #3 NDWall System 1075-03 T001 Building #1, Bay #5, Upper level 1.2%ChrysotilePipe fittings, small/each 1075-04 M003 Building #1, Bay #7 NDFloor Tile - Exposed 1075-05 S001 Building #1, Bay #7, restroom NDSurfacing Material 1075-06 M004 Building #7, Bay #7, Office area NDCeiling Tile 1075-07 T002 Buiding #1, Bay #7 0.1%ChrysotilePipe fittings, large/each 1075-08 M005 Building #1, Bay #7, restroom NDCove Base 1075-09 M006 Building #4 (refer to drawings)NDTape/Joint Compound 1075-10 M006 Building #4 (refer to drawings for location) NDTape/Joint Compound 1075-11 M007 Building #4 (refer to drawings for location) NDFloor Tile - Exposed 1075-12 M008 Building #4 (refer to drawings for location) 8% 10% Chrysotile (1st layer) Chrysotile (2nd layer) Sink Undercoat 1075-13 M009 Building #4 (refer to drawings for location) NDCeiling Tile 1075-14 M006 Building #4 (refer to drawings for location) NDTape/Joint Compound Asbestos Survey Report - Table 3 Page 1 of 3 SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard SLC Corp Homogeneous Area Number Material Sampled Analytical ResultsSample Number Sample Location 1075-15 M010 Building #4, Fleet management office, entry way >1%Chrysotile (mastic) ND (floor tile) Floor Tile - Exposed 1075-16 M011 Building #5, Fleet management office, restrooms, under M010 >1% 8% Chrysotile (mastic) Chrysotile (floor tile) Floor Tile - Exposed 1075-17 M006 Building #5, fleet management office NDTape/Joint Compound 1075-18 M012 Building #6 (refer to drawings for location) NDCeiling Tile 1075-19 M013 Building #6 (refer to drawings for location) NDFloor Tile - Exposed 1075-20 M014 Building #6 (refer to drawings for location) NDFloor Tile - Exposed 1075-21 M006 Building #6 (refer to drawings for location) NDTape/Joint Compound 1075-22 S001 Building #6, office space (refer to drawings for location) NDSurfacing Material 1075-23 M006 Building #6, office space (refer to drawings for location) NDTape/Joint Compound 1075-24 M015 Building #6, parts department NDFloor Tile - Exposed 1075-25 M016 Building #6, parts department NDFloor Tile - Exposed 1075-26 M017 Building #6, parts department NDFloor Tile - Exposed 1075-27 M018 Building #6 (refer to drawings for location) NDFloor Tile - Exposed 1075-28 M014 Building #6 (refer to drawings for location) NDFloor Tile - Exposed Asbestos Survey Report - Table 3 Page 2 of 3 SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard SLC Corp Homogeneous Area Number Material Sampled Analytical ResultsSample Number Sample Location 1075-29 M019 Building #6 (refer to drawings for location) >1%Chrysotile (mastic) ND (floor tile) Floor Tile - Exposed 1075-30 M020 Building #6 (refer to drawings for location) 5% >1% Chrysotile (floor tile) Chrysotile (mastic) Floor Tile and Mastic Under GDC 1075-31 M006 Building #6, South end offices (refer to drawings for location) NDTape/Joint Compound 1075-32 M021 Buidling #2 (refer to drawings for location) NDRoof Sheeting 1075-33 M022 Building #2 (refer to drawings for location) 8%ChrysotileRoofing Sealant (Seams) 1075-34 M023 Building #1 (refer to drawings for location) NDBuilt-up Roofs, single layer/sq.ft 1075-35 M024 Building #1 (refer to drawings for location) NDRoof Sealant 1075-36 M025 Building #1 (refer to drawings for location) NDRoof Sealant Note: ND =No Asbestos Detected, NA= Not Analyzed, TR = <1% Asbestos, PC = Point Count Asbestos Survey Report - Table 3 Page 3 of 3 SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard SLC Corp Table 5 Damage and Hazard Assessment by Homogeneous Area SLC Corp SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard Homogeneous Area Number DamageSubstrate AccessibilityMaterial Type Assessment Category Disturbance Potential M008 X No Damage Rarely AccessedMetal LowSink Undercoat M010 X No Damage Rarely AccessedCement LowFloor Tile - Exposed M011 X No Damage Rarely AccessedCement LowFloor Tile - Exposed M019 X Slight Damage Rarely AccessedCement LowFloor Tile - Exposed M020 X No Damage Rarely AccessedCement LowFloor Tile and Mastic Under GDC M022 X No Damage Rarely AccessedMetal/Roof Felt LowRoofing Sealant (Seams) T001 5 No Damage Rarely AccessedMetal LowPipe fittings, small/each Note: Damage Assessment Categories: 1-Damaged or significantly damaged thermal system insulation ACM 2-Damaged friable surfacing ACM 3-Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM 4-Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM 5-ACM with potential for damage 6-ACM with potential for significant damage 7-Any remaining friable ACM or friable suspect ACM X-Not applicable (material is nonfriable surfacing or miscellaneous material) Asbestos Survey Report - Table 5 Page 1 of 1 SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard SLC Corp Table 6 Estimated Abatement Costs by Homogeneous Area SLC Corp SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard Homogeneous Area Number Material Extended CostAmountUnit Cost M008 Sink Undercoat 1 units $73.33 $73 M010 Floor Tile - Exposed 512 sq. ft.$2.36 $1,208 M011 Floor Tile - Exposed 80 sq. ft.$2.36 $189 M019 Floor Tile - Exposed 128 sq. ft.$2.36 $302 M020 Floor Tile and Mastic Under GD 4,640 sq. ft.$4.83 $22,411 M022 Roofing Sealant (Seams)12,290 sq. ft.$2.00 $24,580 T001 Pipe fittings, small/each 5 fittings $18.67 $93 Total Estimated Abatement Cost $48,857 Note: Estimated abatement costs do not include replacement costs or costs for a consultant to manage the abatement. Asbestos Survey Report - Table 6 Page 1 of 1 SLC Corp Former Fleet Yard SLC Corp Appendix B Building Floor Plans 1 1 13 (4') 16 (8') 1 4 (8') 24 (4') 1 18 (8') 36 (4') 1 1 1 8 (4') 2 (4') 4 (8') 9 111 1 1 8 (8') 14 (4') 12 (8') 24 (4') 11 1 4 (4')2 (4')2 (4') 8 2 (8') Building 1 - Shops 20 (4') 2 1 3 8 5 4 6 7 Fluorescent Light Tubes Explanation 1 1 8 2 (8') 1 Na Vapor Lamp CFC-containing Window A/C Asbestos Sample Location Fire Extinguisher Location 1111 1 1 No Access Asbestos Roof Sample Location2 35 S-1 Small Asbestos-containing pipe fittings L-1 Large Asbestos-containing pipe fittings 34 36 S-2 L-2 PROJECT No: SHEET: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: Sa l t L a k e C i t y C o r p . Sa l t L a k e C i t y C o r p . F l e e t Y a r d 85 0 s o u t h 3 0 0 W e s t Sa l t L a k e C i t y , U T As b e s t o s S a m p l e & H a z a r d o u s M a t e r i a l L o c a t i o n M a p DATE: DATE: DATE: REVISED BY: 640 E. Wilmington Ave. Salt Lake City, UT 84106 801.466.2223 ihi@ihi-env.com 0 10'20' 12U-A1075 1 of 7 Keith 5-30-2012 V: \ - 1 2 P r o j e c t s \ 1 2 U - A 1 0 7 5 S L C C o r p F o r m e r F l e e t Y a r d A s b , P b & U H M S v y s \ D r a w i n g s \ 1 2 U A 1 0 7 5 . d w g , B l d g 1 a c m s a m h a z m a t l o c m a p , 5 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 2 1 2 : 1 1 : 1 7 P M , k e i t h f , A N S I f u l l b l e e d B ( 1 7 . 0 0 x 1 1 . 0 0 I n c h e s ) Salt Lake City Corp. Salt Lake City Corp. Fleet Yard 850 south 300 West Salt Lake City, UT REVIEWED BY: DRAWN BY: SHEET NO: PROJECT No: Asbestos Sample & Hazardous Material Location Map DATE: DATE: 640 E. Wilmington Ave. Salt Lake City, UT 84106 801.466.2223 ihi@ihi-env.com 0 10'20' 12U-A1075 3 of 7 Keith 5-30-2012 N Building 4 - Storage 16 (4') 1 (4') 16 (4') 1 2 20 (4') 4 (4') 1 1 14 9 11 13 10 Fluorescent Light Tubes Explanation 1 8 2 (8') 1 Na Vapor Lamp CFC-containing unit Asbestos Sample Location Building 4 Roof Asbestos-containing roof sealant at seams Asbestos-containing sink undercoating Condensing Unit V: \ - 1 2 P r o j e c t s \ 1 2 U - A 1 0 7 5 S L C C o r p F o r m e r F l e e t Y a r d A s b , P b & U H M S v y s \ D r a w i n g s \ 1 2 U A 1 0 7 5 . d w g , B l d g 4 a c m s a m h a z m a t l o c m a p , 5 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 2 9 : 5 9 : 4 9 A M , k e i t h f , A N S I f u l l b l e e d A ( 8 . 5 0 x 1 1 . 0 0 I n c h e s ) 24 (8') 40 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 (4') 4 ( 4 ' ) 32 (8') 40 1 36 (4') 2 (4') 1 1 2 24 (4') 80 (8') 4 (4') 8 (4')8 (4') 18 (4') 16 (4') 8 (4')6 (4') 8 (4') 44 (4') 4 (4') 4 (4') 1 18 19 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 Fluorescent Light Tubes Explanation 1 1 8 2 (8') 1 Na Vapor Lamp CFC-containing Window A/C Asbestos Sample Location Fire Extinguisher Location Ma t c h l i n e Building 6 No Access NOTE: Three (3) large CFC-containing units on roof S-1 Small Asbestos-containing pipe fittings Explanation NOTE: Three (3) large CFC-containing units on roof No Access PROJECT No: SHEET: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: Sa l t L a k e C i t y C o r p . Sa l t L a k e C i t y C o r p . F l e e t Y a r d 85 0 s o u t h 3 0 0 W e s t Sa l t L a k e C i t y , U T As b e s t o s S a m p l e & H a z a r d o u s M a t e r i a l L o c a t i o n M a p DATE: DATE: DATE: REVISED BY: 640 E. Wilmington Ave. Salt Lake City, UT 84106 801.466.2223 ihi@ihi-env.com 0 10'20' 12U-A1075 5 of 7 Keith 5-30-2012 V: \ - 1 2 P r o j e c t s \ 1 2 U - A 1 0 7 5 S L C C o r p F o r m e r F l e e t Y a r d A s b , P b & U H M S v y s \ D r a w i n g s \ 1 2 U A 1 0 7 5 . d w g , B l d g 6 a a c m s a m h a z m a t l o c m a p , 5 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 2 1 2 : 1 2 : 2 7 P M , k e i t h f , A N S I f u l l b l e e d B ( 1 7 . 0 0 x 1 1 . 0 0 I n c h e s ) Building 2 - Storage Spaces 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 Explanation 8 Na Vapor Lamp Lead-acid batteries Asbestos-containing roof sealant at seams ## No Access Building 2 Roof 1 Fire Extinguisher Location PROJECT No: SHEET: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: Sa l t L a k e C i t y C o r p . Sa l t L a k e C i t y C o r p . F l e e t Y a r d 85 0 s o u t h 3 0 0 W e s t Sa l t L a k e C i t y , U T As b e s t o s S a m p l e & H a z a r d o u s M a t e r i a l L o c a t i o n M a p DATE: DATE: DATE: REVISED BY: 640 E. Wilmington Ave. Salt Lake City, UT 84106 801.466.2223 ihi@ihi-env.com 0 10'20' 12U-A1075 2 of 7 Keith 5-30-2012 V: \ - 1 2 P r o j e c t s \ 1 2 U - A 1 0 7 5 S L C C o r p F o r m e r F l e e t Y a r d A s b , P b & U H M S v y s \ D r a w i n g s \ 1 2 U A 1 0 7 5 . d w g , B l d g 2 a c m s a m h a z m a t l o c m a p , 5 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 2 1 2 : 1 1 : 3 5 P M , k e i t h f , A N S I f u l l b l e e d B ( 1 7 . 0 0 x 1 1 . 0 0 I n c h e s ) 70 (8') 24 32 (8') 4 (4') 4 (4') 6 (4') 4 (4') 2 ( 4 ' ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 (8') 7 (4') 12 (8') 8 (4') 8 (4') 2 (4') 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Building 5 - Fleet Mgmnt. Building 17 16 15 Basement 2nd Floor Fluorescent Light Tubes Explanation 1 1 8 2 (8') 1 Na Vapor Lamp CFC-containing Window A/C Asbestos Sample Location Fire Extinguisher Location 2 CFC-containing Drinking Fountain Hg Thermostat Condensing Unit Roof Asbestos-containing roof sealant at seams Asbestos-containing mastic under floor tile & GDC Asbestos-containing floor tile & mastic (exposed) PROJECT No: SHEET: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: Sa l t L a k e C i t y C o r p . Sa l t L a k e C i t y C o r p . F l e e t Y a r d 85 0 s o u t h 3 0 0 W e s t Sa l t L a k e C i t y , U T As b e s t o s S a m p l e & H a z a r d o u s M a t e r i a l L o c a t i o n M a p DATE: DATE: DATE: REVISED BY: 640 E. Wilmington Ave. Salt Lake City, UT 84106 801.466.2223 ihi@ihi-env.com 0 10'20' 12U-A1075 4 of 7 Keith 5-30-2012 N V: \ - 1 2 P r o j e c t s \ 1 2 U - A 1 0 7 5 S L C C o r p F o r m e r F l e e t Y a r d A s b , P b & U H M S v y s \ D r a w i n g s \ 1 2 U A 1 0 7 5 . d w g , B l d g 5 a c m s a m h a z m a t l o c m a p , 5 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 2 1 2 : 1 2 : 0 4 P M , k e i t h f , A N S I f u l l b l e e d B ( 1 7 . 0 0 x 1 1 . 0 0 I n c h e s ) 1 1 1 4 (4') 1 20 (8') 34 28 (8') 40 4 (4')6 (4') 1 4 (4') 1 40 4 (4') 4 (4') 4 (4')4 (4')2 (4') 1 8 (4') 28 27 Ma t c h l i n e Ma t c h l i n e Building 6 No Access S-6 29 Fluorescent Light Tubes Explanation 1 1 8 2 (8') 1 Na Vapor Lamp CFC-containing unit Asbestos Sample Location Fire Extinguisher Location NOTE: Three (3) large CFC-containing units on roof S-1 Small Asbestos-containing pipe fittings Asbestos-containing floor tile & mastic under GDC Asbestos-containing mastic under non-ACM floor tile PROJECT No: SHEET: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: Sa l t L a k e C i t y C o r p . Sa l t L a k e C i t y C o r p . F l e e t Y a r d 85 0 s o u t h 3 0 0 W e s t Sa l t L a k e C i t y , U T As b e s t o s S a m p l e & H a z a r d o u s M a t e r i a l L o c a t i o n M a p DATE: DATE: DATE: REVISED BY: 640 E. Wilmington Ave. Salt Lake City, UT 84106 801.466.2223 ihi@ihi-env.com 0 10'20' 12U-A1075 6 of 7 Keith 5-30-2012 V: \ - 1 2 P r o j e c t s \ 1 2 U - A 1 0 7 5 S L C C o r p F o r m e r F l e e t Y a r d A s b , P b & U H M S v y s \ D r a w i n g s \ 1 2 U A 1 0 7 5 . d w g , B l d g 6 b a c m s a m h a z m a t l o c m a p , 5 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 2 1 0 : 0 7 : 2 9 A M , k e i t h f , A N S I f u l l b l e e d B ( 1 7 . 0 0 x 1 1 . 0 0 I n c h e s ) 4 (4') 4 (4') 4 (4') 8 (4')8 (4')12 (4')12 (4') 8 (4')8 (4')20 (4') 16 (4') 60 (4') 8 (8') 12 (4') 6 (4') 6 (4') 12 ( 4 ' ) 16 (4') 76 (4') 8 (4') Building 6 31 30 Ma t c h l i n e Fluorescent Light Tubes Explanation 1 1 8 2 (8') 1 Na Vapor Lamp CFC-containing Window A/C Asbestos Sample Location Fire Extinguisher Location NOTE: Three (3) large CFC-containing units on roof S-1 Small Asbestos-containing pipe fittings S-6 1 111 1 29 No Access Building 7 Asbestos-containing floor tile & mastic under GDC Asbestos-containing mastic under non-ACM floor tile No Access 1 1 1 1 PROJECT No: SHEET: DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: Sa l t L a k e C i t y C o r p . Sa l t L a k e C i t y C o r p . F l e e t Y a r d 85 0 s o u t h 3 0 0 W e s t Sa l t L a k e C i t y , U T As b e s t o s S a m p l e & H a z a r d o u s M a t e r i a l L o c a t i o n M a p DATE: DATE: DATE: REVISED BY: 640 E. Wilmington Ave. Salt Lake City, UT 84106 801.466.2223 ihi@ihi-env.com 0 10'20' 12U-A1075 7 of 7 Keith 5-30-2012 V: \ - 1 2 P r o j e c t s \ 1 2 U - A 1 0 7 5 S L C C o r p F o r m e r F l e e t Y a r d A s b , P b & U H M S v y s \ D r a w i n g s \ 1 2 U A 1 0 7 5 . d w g , B l d g 6 c a c m s a m h a z m a t l o c m a p , 5 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 2 1 2 : 1 3 : 0 6 P M , k e i t h f , A N S I f u l l b l e e d B ( 1 7 . 0 0 x 1 1 . 0 0 I n c h e s ) Appendix C Laboratory Analytical Reports uvwxywz{|}~z|€yz |‚ƒ~yƒ|ƒ„yzu}yy~z…|w†‡ˆˆwv‰zŠ‹Œz{z ŒŒzŽ{|}~z|€yz ‚~ {|}~z|€yz ‚~ z vwˆvw|~‚vƒ¡‹•z{z{~|~y–z¢xz¡‹•ŠŒ•™‹ ‹™¦§•‹ IIHHII E N V I R O N M E N T A L LEAD PAINT INSPECTION Former Fleet Yard Salt Lake City Corporation 850 South 300 West Salt Lake City, Utah May 30, 2012 Prepared for: Ms. Renee Zollinger Environmental Program Manager Salt Lake City Corporation 451 South State Street, Room 145 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 (801) 535-7215 Prepared by: Reviewed by: Lono Folau Inspector PB-1056 Jon H. Self Asbestos Program Manager IHI Project No. 12U-A1075 640 EAST WILMINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 TELEPHONE: 801-466-2223 FAX: 801-466-9616 E-MAIL: IHI@IHI-ENV.COM SALT LAKE CITY SAN FRANCISCO PHOENIX DENVER SEATTLE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 2.0 OBJECTIVE .....................................................................................................................1 3.0 LEAD DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................1 4.0 SURVEY PROCEDURES ...................................................................................................2 4.1 Paint Sampling Methods ....................................................................................2 4.2 XRF Calibration .................................................................................................2 4.3 Field Documentation ..........................................................................................2 5.0 FINDINGS........................................................................................................................3 5.1 Building Components with XRF readings >0.4 mg/cm2 ...................................3 5.2 Building Components with XRF Readings <0.4 mg/cm2 ..................................4 5.3 Paint Chip Sampling ..........................................................................................4 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION ...................................................................................4 6.1 OSHA Construction Requirements ....................................................................5 6.2 EPA Requirements .............................................................................................5 APPENDICES Lead Appendix A: Measured Lead Concentrations in Building Components Lead Paint Inspection Table of Contents IHI Environmental SLC Corporation/Former Fleet Yard Project No. 12U-A1075 1.0 INTRODUCTION On May 9 and 10, 2012, IHI Environmental (IHI) conducted a lead inspection of the remaining six buildings of the former Salt Lake City Corporation Fleet Yard located at 850 South 300 West in Salt Lake City, Utah. Ms. Renee Zollinger, Salt Lake City Corporation Environmental Program Manager, requested this inspection. 2.0 OBJECTIVE The objective of this inspection was to identify lead-containing paint that could be disturbed during the upcoming demolition. 3.0 LEAD DEFINITIONS The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and EPA define “lead- based paint” as any coating that has a lead concentration of 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2) or greater, or if the lead concentration is greater than 0.5% by weight. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) currently considers paint to be lead- containing if the concentration of lead exceeds 600 parts per million (ppm) or 0.06% by weight. Both the CPSC and HUD definitions of lead paint are aimed at protecting the general population from exposure to lead in the residential setting. By contrast, the mission of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with respect to lead-containing paint is to protect workers during construction activities that could result in hazardous exposures. OSHA states that construction work (including renovation, maintenance, and demolition) performed on structures coated with paint that contains levels of lead lower than HUD and CPSC standards can still result in exposures that exceed the regulatory limits. For this reason, OSHA has not defined a lower threshold level of lead content for lead-containing paint, but states that paint having any measurable level of lead may – depending on the activity – poses a significant potential for overexposure. Therefore, construction activities that create lead-containing dust or fume must be performed in accordance with OSHA’s Lead in Construction Standard (29 CFR 1926.62). This standard requires, among other things, medical surveillance, lead training, initial exposure assessments, respiratory protection, and worker hygiene facilities. Lead Paint Inspection 1 IHI Environmental SLC Corporation/Former Fleet Yard Project No. 12U-A1075 4.0 SURVEY PROCEDURES 4.1 Paint Sampling Methods IHI directly measured the concentration of lead using a Niton Model XLp 702A X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Lead Paint Analyzer. The Niton XRF non-destructively measures lead concentrations in painted surfaces, regardless of the number of paint layers present. According to the manufacturer, the detection limit (lower limit of reliable measurement) for this instrument is 0.1 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) ± 0.3 mg/cm2 with the instrument set on the “quick” measuring mode. The quick mode provides 95% confidence that the lead concentration in the paint is above or below the set point of the instrument which, for this survey is 1.0 mg/cm2. For this survey, measurements below 0.4 mg/cm2 were not reported as lead-containing. The Niton XRF sometimes reports negative values. According to the manufacturer, negative values should be expected and interpreted as zero lead content due to the statistical variability of XRF measurement technology. Both HUD and the EPA recognize the statistical variability of XRF technology and the possibility of obtaining negative values where the lead content is near zero. 4.2 XRF Calibration Before, during, and after the testing was completed, the internal calibration of the Niton was checked by taking three consecutive measurements on a red (1.04 mg/cm2) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST #2573) standard paint film. Three more readings were taken on a lead-free white (<0.001 mg/cm2) NIST #2570 film. These calibration checks are performed to detect changes in the instrument’s performance over time. The calibration values obtained were compared to the calibration check tolerance values specified for the instrument to ensure that it was operating within the stated tolerance limits. 4.3 Field Documentation Field data forms were used to manually record information regarding individual XRF measurements. This information includes the structure, the building component, component substrate (e.g., brick, wood, metal, concrete), and paint condition. The field data forms are Lead Paint Inspection 2 IHI Environmental SLC Corporation/Former Fleet Yard Project No. 12U-A1075 then used by the inspector to identify and describe the materials sampled once the instrument’s electronic memory has been downloaded to a personal computer. 5.0 FINDINGS The XRF measurements are included in Table 1 in Appendix A. Measurements are reported in milligrams of lead per square centimeter (mg/cm2). 5.1 Building Components with XRF readings >0.4 mg/cm2 Building 1: Shops • Light gray metal garage doors in Shops 1 and 2 (0.4 mg/cm2) • White concrete wall at Shop 3 (0.4 mg/cm2) • Red concrete column at Shop 4 (0.4 mg/cm2) • Exterior yellow metal roof ladder (0.4 mg/cm2) Building 2: West Storage Sheds • Red concrete base under mechanical unit (1.0 mg/cm2) • Yellow floor striping or marking on asphalt floor (4.5 mg/cm2) Building 3: Fueling Station • Removed Building 4: Northwest Offices and Storage Sheds • No building components with readings at >0.4 mg/cm2 Building 5: Fleet Management • Yellow striping or marking on concrete floor (7.5 mg/cm2) • Yellow metal mechanical unit-Rigger’s (0.6 mg/cm2) • Exterior orange metal posts (0.9 mg/cm2) • Exterior yellow metal posts (1.9 mg/cm2) Building 6: Fleet Maintenance • Orange metal mechanical unit-Rigger’s (2.4 mg/cm2) • Glazing on ceramic tile wall in Locker Room (2.5 mg/cm2) • Light gray metal door jamb in Locker Room’s Restroom (0.6 mg/cm2) • Glazing on ceramic tile walls, baseboard and door jamb in Locker Room’s Showers (2.1 – 5.9 mg/cm2) • Gray metal door in Parts Department Room (0.4 mg/cm2) Lead Paint Inspection 3 IHI Environmental SLC Corporation/Former Fleet Yard Project No. 12U-A1075 Building 7: Street Maintenance Offices • Exterior white metal door on the north side of street maintenance garage (0.5 – 0.7 mg/cm2) Note: The street maintenance garage was not accessible during the inspection. It was used by the Salt Lake City Bomb Squad. 5.2 Building Components with XRF Readings <0.4 mg/cm2 According to ThermoScientific, the Niton XRF cannot reliably quantify lead below 0.4 mg/cm2. The building components listed below indicated levels of lead below 0.4 mg/cm2. IHI, therefore, recommends that these materials undergo additional analysis to more reliably determine if they contain lead. • Concrete walls and floors • Brick walls • Wood walls • Drywall walls and ceilings • Metal doors, door jambs, and door casings • Wood doors, door jambs, and door casings • Wood windows • Wood soffits, trusses and fascias 5.3 Paint Chip Sampling No paint chip samples were collected from the building. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION Lead-based paint, glazing or coating was identified on the concrete base in Building 2; metal mechanical units (Rigger) in Buildings 5 and 6; floor striping in Buildings 2 and 5; exterior metal posts around Buildings 5 and 6; and ceramic tiles in Building 6. Other areas with lead- containing paint are listed in Table 1. If workers perform manual demolition, sanding, grinding, welding, cutting, or any other activities that may create lead-containing dust or fume, they must follow the requirements of the OSHA Lead in Construction Standard, 29 CFR 1926.62. This standard requires, among other things, lead training, an initial exposure assessment, and hygiene facilities for all potentially exposed workers. Lead Paint Inspection 4 IHI Environmental SLC Corporation/Former Fleet Yard Project No. 12U-A1075 Lead Paint Inspection 5 IHI Environmental SLC Corporation/Former Fleet Yard Project No. 12U-A1075 6.1 OSHA Construction Requirements The Lead in Construction Standard specifies that employers are responsible for ensuring that their employees are not exposed to airborne lead concentrations exceeding the OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL) of fifty micrograms per cubic meter or air (50 µg/m3) averaged over an 8-hour period, and to take appropriate precautions when exposures reach an Action Level of 30 µg/m3 averaged over an 8-hour period. The standard was written to require initial exposure monitoring or the use of historical or objective data to ensure that employee exposures do not exceed the Action Level. Depending on the specific construction activities being performed (e.g., manual demolition, sanding, grinding, welding, cutting), employers must assume their employees are overexposed to lead and must provide personal protective equipment – including respiratory protection – until an exposure assessment proves otherwise.1 6.2 EPA Requirements The presence of lead in demolition debris from non-residential buildings has the potential to impose limitations on where and how the debris may be disposed. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requires each waste generator to determine if his wastes are hazardous. This can be determined either through generator knowledge or by testing. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) testing is the preferred method for determining if wastes are hazardous. The demolition wastes from this project should undergo TCLP testing prior to disposal to determine if they are hazardous. 1 See 29 CFR 1926(d)(2) Protection of employees during assessment of exposure. Lead Appendix A Table 1 Measured Lead Concentrations in Building Components IIHHII E N V I R O N M E N T A L UNIVERSAL, HAZARDOUS, AND TOXIC WASTE INSPECTION Former Salt Lake City Maintenance Fleet Yard Property 850 South 300 West Salt Lake City, Utah June 4, 2012 Prepared for: Ms. Renee Zollinger, Environmental Program Manager Salt Lake City Corporation 451 South State Street Room 145 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Prepared by: Reviewed by: Todd Maresca, SL County Pre- Demo Building Inspector PBI-087 Jon H. Self Asbestos Program Manager Project #12U-A1075 640 EAST WILMINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 TELEPHONE: 801-466-2223 FAX: 801-466-9616 E-MAIL: IHI@IHI-ENV.COM SALT LAKE CITY SAN FRANCISCO PHOENIX DENVER SEATTLE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODS .......................................................................................................................1 3.0 FINDINGS........................................................................................................................1 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION ...................................................................................2 5.0 COST ESTIMATE ............................................................................................................2 6.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................3 Appendix A: SLVHD Pre-Demolition Form Universal/Hazardous/Toxic Waste Inspection Table of Contents IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 1.0 INTRODUCTION From May 9 through11, 2012, IHI Environmental conducted a pre-demolition inspection of the former Salt Lake City maintenance fleet yard located at 850 South 300 West, Salt Lake City, Utah. Ms. Renee Zollinger, Environmental Program Manager for the Salt Lake City Corporation, requested this inspection so that these materials could be identified and removed before any upcoming renovations or demolition of these buildings. The materials included in the scope of this inspection included the following: • batteries, • mercury thermostats and lamps, • PCB light ballasts and oil-containing transformers, • identified and/or potential hazardous wastes, • CFC-containing air conditioning units or refrigerators, and • other containerized toxic or special wastes in the building. There are seven buildings on this property. The buildings consist of wood, steel, cement and brick. Construction dates are unknown. The buildings have been used for various purposes. 2.0 METHODS IHI conducted a visual inspection of all accessible areas throughout the building, but did not conduct any destructive inspections to characterize any material. 3.0 FINDINGS The following materials were identified in the building: Material Location* Quantity Est. Removal Cost Mercury-vapor fluorescent light tubes Various areas throughout 450 (8’) 691 (4’) $1,080 $830 Sodium-vapor bulbs Exterior 302 $4,530 Liquid wastes To be determined after facilities are fully vacated TBD TBD CFC-containing units Roof and various areas inside facilities 18 $1,800 Misc. batteries Various areas 2 $40 Mercury thermostats Various areas 1 $30 Universal/Hazardous/Toxic Waste Inspection 1 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION The Salt Lake Valley Health Department requires that building owners follow EPA Guidance outlined in 40 CFR 273 (Standards for Universal Waste Management) and 40 CFR 261 and 262 (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act), and Department of Transportation regulations outlined at 49 CFR 173 (Shippers - General Requirements for Shipments and Packaging) for the removal, transport and disposal of these wastes. These protocols require building owners to identify and remove all universal, hazardous, and/or toxic wastes from buildings before they are demolished. As such, IHI recommends that all identified materials be removed and disposed of by properly trained and licensed contractors. 5.0 COST ESTIMATE The estimated cost for the removal, packaging, transportation, and proper waste disposal of these materials is $8,310. This estimate does not include fees for design or management consulting services. Notes: It is recommended that IHI perform a final walk-through of the facility after the current tenants have vacated the property. This will be to assess any hazardous chemicals that may have been left. It is recommended, as good practice, that the ballasts that do not contain PCBs be removed prior to the demolition of the facility. Universal/Hazardous/Toxic Waste Inspection 2 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 Universal/Hazardous/Toxic Waste Inspection 3 IHI Environmental Salt Lake City Corporation Project No. 12U-A1075 6.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS This Project was performed using, as a minimum, practices consistent with standards acceptable within the industry at this time, and a level of diligence typically exercised by EH&S consultants performing similar services. The procedures used attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative and reporting costs and time, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, because the findings of this report were derived from the scope, costs, time and other limitations, the conclusions should not be construed as a guarantee that all universal, toxic and/or hazardous wastes have been identified and fully evaluated. Furthermore, IHI assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information, or data, provided by sources outside of IHI or from omissions or errors in public records. It is emphasized that the final decision on how much risk to accept always remains with the client since IHI is not in a position to fully understand all of the client's needs. Clients with a greater aversion to risk may want to take additional actions while others, with less aversion to risk, may want to take no further action. Appendix A SLVHD Pre-Demolition Form !"#$$%&'( ")*+," -. ./0""123+," -. ./0.(4567589:;<;9=>?;:7;=@A=BC5D<;9=E948F*GHIJKLJJJMNIOPN2QI#O'PQNO$JJRSTKPGKUF%HPJVGSH)$V$%QW$NTO$JJH)$V$%QW$)*NTX$HSTK)$TYK$NTO$JJHSTK)$TYK$)*NTX$HPN)F'PQNI&'OT F#$G$%,YU-'*$TJJ YU2K$JGU*J )FLLKKJJ$'$JR$T$J IR$U$&JFUF2FZJ F$JR[$Y\$JJPGKU]*GKL$JH JVGOF#,TVK-HN)$JPJVG$ZJNTH,U)$-IU^_)LP2QQ/&)PN)F'PQNI&'SHPJVG$HY`KKRTJX$T`a,F*G-bJNSP)QP'PQNQ2PSN'P2PSP'#NTRSJVJK$IG%GKU2GK% SYU'*$TJJYU2K$JGU*J)FLLKKJJ$'$JR$T$JIR$U$&JFUF2FZJF$JR[$Y\$JJOF# ccdAA AeAcfEc gcOVV$`H,F$GK-bJNOVV$`X%Hhijjklmnopqm rstuvwxysz{|}~~€}}~ ‚~ƒ„…~†ƒ‡ˆ~‰Š…‹‚~Œ ƒ„…~†ƒ‡ˆ~‰Š…‹~‰• • ƒ…Š•–‚~—|“~~…ƒ…ˆ~…‚~˜™~“—|‚~†‰‚~Œ {}“š|€|š›”“|“ œ••š—ž’~Ÿ‘“~{ž’~—|} œ••š“{ œ••š”~ ¡ƒ……ˆ Šˆ¢£˜••¤Š–¥~¢‹¢…ˆ™‚~¦ƒ„„~¢‹¢…ˆ™‚~¤„•• ~…Š„ˆ‚~¢ˆƒ„ƒ–…¢‚~§ˆŠ„Š–¥~…Š„ˆ¢‚~ Š ˆ~Š–¢¨„ƒ…Š•–}{› Table 1 Measured Lead Concentration in Building Components Salt Lake City Corporation Former Fleet Yard-Building 1 Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number Calibration 0 NIST 2570 White1 Calibration 0.01 NIST 2570 White2 Calibration 0.01 NIST 2570 White3 Calibration 1 NIST 2573 Red4 Calibration 1.1 NIST 2573 Red5 Calibration 1.1 NIST 2573 Red6 Shop 1 0.01 Wall A Concrete Lt. Gray Good7 Shop 1 0.01 Wall B Concrete Lt. Gray Good8 Shop 1 0.01 Wall D Concrete Lt. Gray Good9 Shop 1 0.4 Garage Door B Metal Lt. Gray Good10 Shop 1 0.01 Door A Metal Yellow Good11 Shop 1 0 Door Jamb A Metal Lt. Gray Good12 Shop 1 0.05 Floor A Concrete Gray Good13 Shop 1 0.02 Wall Trim A Concrete Yellow Good14 Shop 1 0.01 Ceiling A Concrete Lt. Gray Good15 Shop 2 0 Wall B Concrete Lt. Gray Good16 Shop 2 0 Wall C Brick White Good17 Shop 2 0 Baseboard C Wood Brown Good18 Shop 2 0 Floor C Concrete Gray Poor19 Shop 2 0.4 Garage Door B Metal Lt. Gray Good20 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 1 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 1 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number Shop 3 0.02 Wall A Brick White Good21 Shop 3 0.02 Wall A Brick Tan Good22 Shop 3 0.03 Wall B Drywall White Good23 Shop 3 0.04 Wall B Drywall Tan Good24 Shop 3 0.03 Wall C Brick White Good25 Shop 3 0.03 Wall C Brick Tan Good26 Shop 3 0.4 Wall D Concrete White Good27 Shop 3 0.12 Wall D Concrete Tan Good28 Shop 3 0 Door D Metal Lt. Tan Good29 Shop 3 0.24 Door Jamb D Metal Lt. Tan Good30 Shop 3 0 Floor D Concrete Gray Poor31 Shop 3 0 Door B Metal Tan Good32 Shop 3 0 Door Jamb B Metal Tan Good33 Shop 3 0.01 Duct D Metal White Good34 Shop 3A 0 Wall A Brick White Good35 Shop 3A 0.01 Wall B Concrete White Good36 Shop 3A 0 Wall C Brick White Good37 Shop 3A 0 Wall D Concrete White Good38 Shop 3A 0.01 Floor D Concrete Gray Fair39 Shop 3A 0 Door D Metal White Good40 Shop 3A 0.1 Door Jamb D Metal White Good41 Shop 3A 0 Window-Casing D Wood Maroon Good42 Shop 3A 0 Door-Casing A Wood Maroon Good43 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 2 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 1 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number Shop 3A 0.01 Door A Wood Maroon Good44 Shop 4 0 Wall A Brick White Good45 Shop 4 0 Wall B Concrete White Good46 Shop 4 0 Wall C Concrete White Good47 Shop 4 0.01 Wall D Concrete White Good48 Shop 4 0.01 Floor D Concrete Gray Poor49 Shop 4 0 Door D Metal White Good50 Shop 4 0.29 Door Jamb D Metal White Good51 Shop 4 0 Column C Metal White Good52 Shop 4 0.4 Column B Metal Red Good53 Shop 4 0.01 I-Beam A Concrete Yellow Good54 Shop 4 0.01 Railing A Wood White Good55 Shop 4 0 Stair-Railing A Wood White Good56 Shop 5 0.01 Door A Metal Gray Good57 Shop 5 0.03 Column A Metal Lt. Blue Good58 Shop 5 0.02 I-Beam A Wood Lt. Blue Good59 Shop 5 0.02 Joist A Wood Lt. Blue Good60 Shop 5 0.03 Stair-Stringer A Wood Lt. Blue Good61 Shop 5 0.05 Stair-Railing A Wood Lt. Blue Good62 Shop 5 0.01 Floor D Concrete Gray Good63 Shop 5 0 Garage Door D Metal Lt. Brown Good64 Shop 6 0.24 Wall A Brick White Good65 Shop 6 0.13 Wall B Concrete White Good66 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 3 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 1 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number Shop 6 0.04 Wall C Brick White Good67 Shop 6A 0.12 Wall A Brick Lt. Green Good68 Shop 6A 0.18 Wall C Concrete Lt. Green Good69 Shop 6A 0 Ceiling C Drywall White Good70 Shop 7 0.05 Wall A Concrete Lt. Blue Good71 Shop 7 0 Wall B Drywall White Good72 Shop 7 0.13 Wall C Brick Lt. Blue Good73 Shop 7 0 Stair-Stringer C Wood Lt. Gray Good74 Shop 7 0 Stair-Railing C Wood Lt. Gray Good75 Shop 7 0.03 Railing C Wood Lt. Blue Good76 Shop 7 0.1 Wall B Concrete Orange Good77 Shop 7 0.08 Wall C Brick Orange Good78 Shop 7 0.04 Ceiling B Concrete Orange Good79 Shop 7 0.03 Pipe B Metal Orange Good80 Shop 7 0.08 Floor C Concrete Gray Poor81 Shop 7 0 Door C Metal Gray Poor82 Shop 7 0 Door Jamb C Metal Gray Poor83 Shop 7 0 Door-Casing C Metal Gray Poor84 Shop 8 0.17 Wall A Brick Lt. Green Good85 Shop 8 0.1 Wall B Concrete Lt. Green Good86 Shop 8 0.15 Wall C Concrete Lt. Green Good87 Shop 8 0.17 Wall D Concrete Lt. Green Good88 Shop 8 0 Column A Metal Lt. Green Good89 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 4 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 1 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number Shop 8 0.01 Column C Metal Lt. Green Good90 Shop 8 0 Door A Metal Gray Good91 Shop 8 0.17 Door Jamb A Metal Lt. Green Good92 Shop 8 0.02 Door B Metal White Good93 Shop 8 0 Door Jamb B Wood Brown Good94 Shop 8 0.04 Door D Metal Lt. Gray Good95 Shop 8 0 Door-Casing D Wood Brown Good96 Shop 8A 0.04 Wall A Drywall Orange Good97 Shop 8A 0.04 Wall B Drywall Orange Good98 Shop 8A 0.1 Wall C Concrete Orange Good99 Shop 8A 0.09 Wall D Concrete Orange Good100 Shop 8A 0.09 Door D Metal White Good101 Shop 8A 0.17 Door Jamb D Metal Brown Good102 Exterior 0 Exterior-Wall A Concrete Lt. Tan Good103 Exterior 0.03 Exterior-Window A Concrete White Good104 Exterior 0 Exterior-Door A Metal White Good105 Exterior 0 Exterior-Door A Metal Lt. Tan Good106 Exterior 0.02 Exterior-Wall D Concrete Lt. Tan Good107 Exterior 0.12 Exterior-Door D Metal White Good108 Exterior 0 Exterior-Wall D Concrete Lt. Tan Good109 Exterior 0 Exterior-Door D Metal White Good110 Exterior 0.8 Ladder D Metal Yellow Good111 Exterior 0.02 Exterior-Fascia D Metal Tan Good112 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 5 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 1 Salt Lake City Corporation Table 1 Measured Lead Concentration in Building Components Salt Lake City Corporation Former Fleet Yard-Building 2 Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number Calibration 0.01 NIST 2570 White1 Calibration 0 NIST 2570 White2 Calibration 0 NIST 2570 White3 Calibration 1 NIST 2573 Red4 Calibration 1.2 NIST 2573 Red5 Calibration 1.1 NIST 2573 Red6 Storage Sheds 0 Wall A Wood Varnish Good7 Storage Sheds 0 Door A Metal Lt. Brown Good8 Storage Sheds 0 Door-Casing A Metal Lt. Brown Good9 Storage Sheds 0.01 Door Jamb A Metal Lt. Brown Good10 Storage Sheds 0 Door A Metal Lt. Brown Good11 Storage Sheds 0.06 Column A Metal Brown Good12 Storage Sheds 0.01 Column A Metal Brown Good13 Storage Sheds 0.01 Column A Metal Brown Good14 Storage Sheds 0.05 Column B Metal Brown Good15 Storage Sheds 0.12 Mechanical Unit B Metal Black Good16 Storage Sheds 0 Mechanical Unit B Metal Black Good17 Storage Sheds 1 Mechanical Unit-B Concrete Red Good18 Storage Sheds 1 Mechanical Unit-B Concrete Red Good19 Storage Sheds 4.5 Floor Striping C Concrete Yellow Good20 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 1 of 2 Former Fleet Yard-Building 2 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number Storage Sheds 0.01 Floor Striping C Concrete Orange Good21 Storage Sheds 0.04 Floor Striping C Concrete White Good22 Storage Sheds 0.04 Column C Metal Brown Good23 Storage Sheds 0.04 Column C Metal Brown Good24 Storage Sheds 0.02 Column C Metal Black Fair25 Storage Sheds 0 Exterior-Down C Metal White Good26 Storage Sheds 0 Exterior-Gutter C Metal White Good27 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 2 of 2 Former Fleet Yard-Building 2 Salt Lake City Corporation Table 1 Measured Lead Concentration in Building Components Salt Lake City Corporation Former Fleet Yard-Building 4 Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 4 Office 2 0 Wall A Drywall White Good1 4 Office 2 0 Wall B Drywall White Good2 4 Office 2 0 Wall C Drywall White Good3 4 Office 2 0 Wall D Drywall White Good4 4 Office 2 0 Ceiling D Drywall White Poor5 4 Office 2 0.01 Floor C Concrete Gray Good6 4 Office 2 0.01 Baseboard D Wood Gray Good7 4 Office 2 0.01 Closet-Door Casing D Wood Gray Good8 4 Office 2 0.04 Closet-Door D Metal Gray Good9 4 Office 2 0 Door B Wood Gray Good10 4 Office 2 0 Door Jamb B Wood Gray Good11 4 Office 3 0.01 Wall A Drywall White Good12 4 Office 3 0 Wall B Drywall White Good13 4 Office 3 0.01 Wall C Drywall White Good14 4 Office 3 0.01 Wall D Drywall White Good15 4 Office 3 0 Floor B Concrete Gray Good16 4 Office 3 0 Baseboard B Wood Gray Good17 4 Office 3 0 Door-Casing C Wood Gray Good18 4 Office 3 0 Door C Wood Gray Good19 4 Exterior 0.01 Exterior-Wall A Wood Beige Poor20 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 1 of 2 Former Fleet Yard-Building 4 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 4 Exterior 0 Exterior-Wall B Wood Beige Poor21 4 Exterior 0 Exterior-Door B Wood White Good22 4 Exterior 0 Exterior-Door B Wood Varnish Good23 4 Exterior 0 Exterior-Corner B Wood White Poor24 4 Exterior 0 Exterior-Window B Wood White Poor25 4 Exterior 0 Exterior-Soffit B Wood White Poor26 4 Exterior 0 Exterior-Truss B Wood White Poor27 4 Exterior 0 Exterior-Door B Wood White Poor28 4 Exterior 0 Exterior-Door B Wood White Poor29 4 Garage 0 Wall A Wood White Good30 4 Garage 0 Wall Trim A Wood Blue Good31 4 Garage 0 Wall C Wood White Good32 4 Garage 0 Wall Trim C Wood White Good33 4 Garage 0 Wall D Brick White Good34 4 Garage 0 Column A Metal White Good35 4 Garage 0.01 Column C Metal White Good36 4 Garage 0 Door C Wood White Good37 4 Garage 0 Door-Casing C Wood Blue Good38 4 Garage 0 I-Beam C Wood White Good39 4 Garage 0 Truss C Wood White Good40 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 2 of 2 Former Fleet Yard-Building 4 Salt Lake City Corporation Table 1 Measured Lead Concentration in Building Components Salt Lake City Corporation Former Fleet Yard-Building 5 Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 5-Shop 0.03 Wall A Brick White Good1 5-Shop 0.09 Wall A Brick Dk. Gray Good2 5-Shop 0.03 Wall B Brick Dk. Gray Good3 5-Shop 0.01 Wall B Brick White Good4 5-Shop 0.02 Wall C Brick White Good5 5-Shop 0.03 Wall C Brick Dk. Gray Good6 5-Shop 0.03 Wall D Brick Dk. Gray Good7 5-Shop 0.04 Wall D Brick White Good8 5-Shop 7.5 Floor-Striping D Concrete Yellow Good9 5-Shop 0.6 Mechanical Unit-A Metal Yellow Good10 5-Shop 0.6 Mechanical Unit-A Metal Yellow Good11 5-Shop 0.21 Electrical Panel A Metal Gray Good12 5-Shop 0.07 Door A Metal Gray Good13 5-Shop 0 Door Jamb A Metal Gray Good14 5-Shop 0.09 Door Jamb B Metal Gray Good15 5-Shop 0.08 Door B Metal Gray Good16 5-Men's Restroom 0.3 Wall A Drywall Cream Good17 5-Men's Restroom 0.04 Wall B Drywall Cream Good18 5-Men's Restroom 0.13 Wall C Brick Cream Good19 5-Men's Restroom 0.05 Wall D Brick Cream Good20 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 1 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 5 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 5-Men's Restroom 0.07 Ceiling A Drywall Cream Good21 5-Men's Restroom 0.06 Floor A Concrete Gray Good22 5-Men's Restroom 0.2 Wall B Ceramic Tile White Good23 5-Men's Restroom 0.1 Toilet Stall C Metal Gray Good24 5-Men's Restroom 0.07 Door A Metal Gray Good25 5-Men's Restroom 0.09 Door Jamb A Metal Gray Good26 5-Wash Bay 0.02 Wall A Brick Gray Good27 5-Wash Bay 0.01 Wall A Brick White Good28 5-Wash Bay 0.02 Wall B Brick White Good29 5-Wash Bay 0.04 Wall B Brick Gray Good30 5-Wash Bay 0.06 Wall C Brick Gray Good31 5-Wash Bay 0.02 Wall C Brick White Good32 5-Wash Bay 0.06 Wall D Brick Gray Good33 5-Wash Bay 0.07 Wall D Brick White Good34 5-Wash Bay 0.08 Door A Metal Gray Good35 5-Wash Bay 0.04 Door Jamb A Metal Gray Good36 5-Exterior 0.17 Exterior-Wall A1 Brick Tan Good37 5-Exterior 0.01 Exterior-Door A1 Metal Gray Good38 5-Exterior 0 Exterior-Door A1 Metal Gray Good39 5-Exterior 0.1 Exterior-Wall B1 Brick Tan Good40 5-Exterior 0.01 Exterior-Door B1 Metal Lt. Tan Good41 5-Exterior 0.07 Exterior-Door B1 Metal Lt. Tan Good42 5-Exterior 0.17 Exterior-Wall A2 Brick Tan Good43 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 2 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 5 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 5-Exterior 0.9 Post A2 Metal Orange Good44 5-Exterior 0.05 Exterior-Wall B2 Brick Tan Good45 5-Exterior 0.19 Exterior-Wall C Brick Tan Good46 5-Fleet Office- Upper Level 0 Wall A Wood White Good47 5-Fleet Office- Upper Level 0 Wall B Drywall White Good48 5-Fleet Office- Upper Level 0.02 Wall C Wood White Good49 5-Fleet Office- Upper Level 0 Wall D Wood White Good50 5-Fleet Office- Upper Level 0.05 Wall D Concrete Gray Good51 5-Fleet Office- Upper Level 0.08 Ceiling C Concrete Gray Good52 5-Fleet Office- Upper Level 0.01 Duct C Metal Gray Good53 5-Fleet Office- Upper Level 0 Railing B Wood Gray Good54 5-Fleet Office- Upper Level 0 Stair - Railing A Wood Gray Good55 5-Fleet Office- Upper Level 0 Stair-Stringer A Wood White Good56 5-Fleet Office- Main Level 0.01 Wall A Concrete White Good57 5-Fleet Office- Main Level 0.03 Wall B Concrete White Good58 5-Fleet Office- Main Level 0.03 Wall C Concrete White Good59 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 3 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 5 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 5-Fleet Office- Main Level 0 Wall D Drywall White Good60 5-Fleet Office- Main Level 0.03 Door Jamb B Metal White Good61 5-Fleet Office- Main Level 0.04 Door B Metal White Good62 5-Women's Restroom 0.01 Wall A Drywall White Good63 5-Women's Restroom 0 Wall B Drywall White Good64 5-Women's Restroom 0.03 Wall C Concrete White Good65 5-Women's Restroom 0 Wall D Drywall White Good66 5-Women's Restroom 0 Ceiling A Drywall White Good67 5-Women's Restroom 0 Door Jamb A Metal White Good68 5-Women's Restroom 0 Door A Wood Varnish Good69 5-Fleet Office Exterior 0 Exterior-Wall A Concrete Tan Good70 5-Fleet Office Exterior 0 Exterior-Wall B Concrete Tan Good71 5-Fleet Office Exterior 0 Exterior-Wall C Concrete Tan Good72 5-Fleet Office Exterior 0.05 Exterior-Door B Metal Tan Good73 5-Fleet Office Exterior 1.9 Post B Metal Yellow Good74 5-Garage 0 Wall A Concrete Tan Good75 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 4 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 5 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 5-Garage 0.04 Wall C Brick Tan Good76 5-Garage 0.01 Wall D Brick Tan Good77 5-Garage 0.07 Column B Metal Brown Good78 5-Garage 0.01 Column C Metal Brown Good79 Calibration 0.01 NIST 2570 White80 Calibration 0.01 NIST 2570 White81 Calibration 0 NIST 2570 White82 Calibration 1.1 NIST 2573 Red83 Calibration 1.1 NIST 2573 Red84 Calibration 1 NIST 2573 Red85 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 5 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 5 Salt Lake City Corporation Table 1 Measured Lead Concentration in Building Components Salt Lake City Corporation Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number Calibration 0.01 NIST 2570 White1 Calibration 0 NIST 2570 White2 Calibration 0.01 NIST 2570 White3 Calibration 1.1 NIST 2573 Red4 Calibration 1 NIST 2573 Red5 Calibration 1.1 NIST 2573 Red6 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0.05 Wall A Concrete White Good7 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0.05 Wall A Concrete Gray Good8 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0 Wall B Concrete White Good9 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0 Wall B Concrete Gray Good10 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0.04 Wall C Concrete White Good11 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0.02 Wall C Concrete Gray Good12 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0.05 Wall D Concrete White Good13 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 1 of 13 Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0.01 Wall D Concrete Gray Good14 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0 Floor D Concrete Gray Good15 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0.02 Floor Striping D Concrete Yellow Good16 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 2.4 Mechanical Unit-A Metal Orange Good17 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0 Garage Door A Metal White Good18 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0.01 Garage Door C Metal White Good19 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0.02 Oil Tank B Metal Red Good20 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0.15 Column B Concrete White Good21 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0 Column B Concrete Red Good22 6 Fleet Maintenance Heavy Shop 0.04 Column B Concrete Gray Good23 6 Fleet Maintenance Hall 0 Wall A Brick White Good24 6 Fleet Maintenance Hall 0 Wall B Brick White Good25 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 2 of 13 Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 6 Fleet Maintenance Hall 0 Wall B Brick Lt. Gray Good26 6 Fleet Maintenance Hall 0.02 Wall C Concrete White Good27 6 Fleet Maintenance Hall 0.01 Wall C Concrete Lt. Gray Good28 6 Fleet Maintenance Hall 0 Wall D Brick White Good29 6 Fleet Maintenance Hall 0.03 Wall D Brick Lt. Gray Good30 6 Fleet Maintenance Hall 0.01 Ceiling C Drywall White Good31 6 Fleet Maintenance Hall 0.01 Floor C Concrete Gray Good32 6 Fleet Maintenance Hall 0 Door A Metal Gray Good33 6 Fleet Maintenance Hall 0 Door Jamb A Metal Gray Good34 6 Fleet Maintenance Hall 0.13 Door C Metal Gray Good35 6 Fleet Maintenance Hall 0.14 Door Jamb C Metal Gray Good36 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0 Wall A Metal White Good37 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0.02 Wall A Brick Gray Good38 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 3 of 13 Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0.04 Wall B Brick Gray Good39 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0.07 Wall C Concrete White Good40 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0.07 Wall C Concrete Gray Good41 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0.06 Wall D Concrete White Good42 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0.04 Wall D Concrete Gray Good43 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0.02 Window-Jamb A Metal Gray Good44 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0.01 Vent C Metal Gray Good45 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0 Cabinet Door C Wood White Good46 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0.02 Door Jamb A Wood White Good47 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 4 of 13 Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0.04 Door A Wood Varnish Good48 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0.06 Stair - Railing A Metal Gray Fair49 6 Fleet Maintenance- Upper Level Kitchen 0.06 Stair-Stringer A Metal Gray Fair50 6 Fleet Maintenance- Service & Parts Office 0 Wall A Wood Lt. Gray Good51 6 Fleet Maintenance- Service & Parts Office 0.01 Wall B Wood Lt. Gray Good52 6 Fleet Maintenance- Service & Parts Office 0 Wall C Wood Lt. Gray Good53 6 Fleet Maintenance- Service & Parts Office 0 Wall D Wood Lt. Gray Good54 6 Fleet Maintenance- Service & Parts Office 0 Baseboard C Wood Gray Good55 6 Fleet Maintenance- Service & Parts Office 0 Window-Sill C Wood Gray Good56 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 5 of 13 Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 6 Fleet Maintenance- Service & Parts Office 0 Door B Wood Lt. Gray Good57 6 Fleet Maintenance- Service & Parts Office 0 Door Jamb B Wood Lt. Gray Good58 6 Fleet Maintenance- Service & Parts Office 0.01 Door-Casing B Wood Gray Good59 6 Fleet Maintenance- Locker Room 0.01 Wall A Brick White Good60 6 Fleet Maintenance- Locker Room 0 Wall A Brick Lt. Gray Good61 6 Fleet Maintenance- Locker Room 0.04 Wall B Concrete White Good62 6 Fleet Maintenance- Locker Room 0.01 Wall C Brick White Good63 6 Fleet Maintenance- Locker Room 0.11 Wall D Drywall White Good64 6 Fleet Maintenance- Locker Room 2.5 Wall D Ceramic Tile White Good65 6 Fleet Maintenance- Locker Room 0.02 Floor A Concrete Gray Good66 6 Fleet Maintenance- Locker Room 0 Lockers A Metal Gray Good67 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 6 of 13 Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 6 Fleet Maintenance- Locker Room 0 Lockers B Metal Gray Good68 6 Fleet Maintenance- Locker Room 0.03 Bench B Wood Gray Good69 6 Fleet Maintenance- Restroom 0 Wall A Plastic Cream Good70 6 Fleet Maintenance- Restroom 0 Wall B Plastic Cream Good71 6 Fleet Maintenance- Restroom 0 Wall C Plastic Cream Good72 6 Fleet Maintenance- Restroom 0 Wall D Plastic Cream Good73 6 Fleet Maintenance- Restroom 0 Floor A Ceramic Tile Lt. Gray Good74 6 Fleet Maintenance- Restroom 0.03 Toilet Stall A Metal Blue Good75 6 Fleet Maintenance- Restroom 0.6 Door Jamb A Metal Lt. Gray Good76 6 Fleet Maintenance- Shower 0.02 Wall A Drywall White Good77 6 Fleet Maintenance- Shower 5.4 Wall A Ceramic Tile White Good78 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 7 of 13 Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 6 Fleet Maintenance- Shower 5.1 Wall B Ceramic Tile White Good79 6 Fleet Maintenance- Shower 5.9 Wall C Ceramic Tile White Good80 6 Fleet Maintenance- Shower 2.5 Wall D Ceramic Tile White Good81 6 Fleet Maintenance- Shower 0.01 Floor B Ceramic Tile Lt. Gray Good82 6 Fleet Maintenance- Shower 2.1 Baseboard B Ceramic Tile White Good83 6 Fleet Maintenance- Shower 2.8 Door Jamb B Ceramic Tile White Good84 6 Fleet Maintenance- Unisex Restroom 0 Wall A Drywall White Good85 6 Fleet Maintenance- Unisex Restroom 0.05 Wall A Ceramic Tile White Good86 6 Fleet Maintenance- Unisex Restroom 0.01 Wall B Ceramic Tile White Good87 6 Fleet Maintenance- Unisex Restroom 0.02 Wall C Ceramic Tile White Good88 6 Fleet Maintenance- Unisex Restroom 0.01 Wall D Ceramic Tile White Good89 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 8 of 13 Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 6 Fleet Maintenance- Unisex Restroom 0 Wall D Drywall White Good90 6 Fleet Maintenance- Unisex Restroom 0 Ceiling D Drywall White Good91 6 Fleet Maintenance- Unisex Restroom 0.05 Floor C Ceramic Tile White Good92 6 Fleet Maintenance- Parts Department 0.01 Wall A Concrete White Good93 6 Fleet Maintenance- Parts Department 0.06 Wall B Concrete White Good94 6 Fleet Maintenance- Parts Department 0.02 Wall C Brick White Good95 6 Fleet Maintenance- Parts Department 0.02 Wall D Concrete White Good96 6 Fleet Maintenance- Parts Department 0 Floor C Concrete Gray Good97 6 Fleet Maintenance- Parts Department 0.4 Door C Metal Gray Good98 6 Fleet Maintenance- Parts Department 0.09 Door Jamb C Metal Gray Good99 6 Fleet Maintenance- Light Shop 0.04 Wall A Concrete White Good100 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 9 of 13 Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 6 Fleet Maintenance- Light Shop 0.05 Wall A Concrete Gray Good101 6 Fleet Maintenance- Light Shop 0.01 Wall B Concrete White Good102 6 Fleet Maintenance- Light Shop 0.02 Wall C Concrete White Good103 6 Fleet Maintenance- Light Shop 0.05 Wall C Concrete Gray Good104 6 Fleet Maintenance- Light Shop 0.02 Wall D Concrete White Good105 6 Fleet Maintenance- Light Shop 0.05 Wall D Concrete Gray Good106 6 Fleet Maintenance- Light Shop 0.01 Floor D Concrete Gray Good107 6 Fleet Maintenance- Light Shop 0.01 Floor Striping D Concrete Yellow Good108 6 Fleet Maintenance- Light Shop 0 Door A Metal Gray Good109 6 Fleet Maintenance- Light Shop 0 Door Jamb A Metal Gray Good110 6 Fleet Maintenance- Light Shop 0 Post C Metal White Good111 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 10 of 13 Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 6 Fleet Maintenance- Light Shop 0.01 Post C Metal Gray Good112 6 Fleet Maintenance- Break Room 0.02 Wall A Brick White Good113 6 Fleet Maintenance- Break Room 0.05 Wall B Brick White Good114 6 Fleet Maintenance- Break Room 0.15 Wall C Concrete White Good115 6 Fleet Maintenance- Break Room 0.04 Wall D Brick Brown Good116 6 Fleet Maintenance- Break Room 0.5 Wall Trim A Brick Brown Good117 6 Fleet Maintenance- Break Room 0.02 Ceiling C Drywall White Good118 6 Fleet Maintenance- Break Room 0.08 Column C Concrete White Good119 6 Fleet Maintenance- Break Room 0.15 Pipe C Metal White Good120 6 Fleet Maintenance- Break Room 0.01 Door A Metal Gray Good121 6 Fleet Maintenance- Break Room 0.03 Door Jamb A Metal Tan Good122 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 11 of 13 Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 6 Fleet Maintenance- Break Room 0.01 Door A Wood Tan Good123 6 Fleet Maintenance- Break Room 0.11 Door Jamb A Wood Tan Good124 6 Fleet Maintenance- Break Room 0.07 Window-Sill B Wood Tan Good125 6 Fleet Maintenance- Engine Oil Room 0.01 Wall A Brick White Good126 6 Fleet Maintenance- Engine Oil Room 0.01 Wall A Brick Green Good127 6 Fleet Maintenance- Engine Oil Room 0.06 Wall B Brick Green Good128 6 Fleet Maintenance- Engine Oil Room 0.05 Wall C Concrete White Good129 6 Fleet Maintenance- Engine Oil Room 0.01 Wall C Concrete Green Good130 6 Fleet Maintenance- Engine Oil Room 0.01 Wall D Brick Green Good131 6 Fleet Maintenance- Engine Oil Room 0.01 Ceiling A Drywall White Good132 6 Fleet Maintenance- Engine Oil Room 0.07 Floor B Concrete Gray Good133 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 12 of 13 Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 6 Fleet Maintenance- Engine Oil Room 0.04 Door Jamb A Metal Green Good134 6 Fleet Maintenance- Exterior 0.06 Exterior-Wall C Concrete Tan Good135 6 Fleet Maintenance- Exterior 0 Exterior-Garage C Metal White Good136 6 Fleet Maintenance- Exterior 0 Exterior-Door C Metal White Good137 6 Fleet Maintenance- Exterior 0.01 Exterior-Door C Metal White Good138 6 Fleet Maintenance- Exterior 0.07 Exterior-Wall C Concrete Tan Good139 6 Fleet Maintenance- Exterior 0 Exterior-Wall C Concrete Tan Good140 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 13 of 13 Former Fleet Yard-Building 6 Salt Lake City Corporation Table 1 Measured Lead Concentration in Building Components Salt Lake City Corporation Former Fleet Yard-Building 7 Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 7 N Work Area 0.01 Wall A Drywall White Good1 7 N Work Area 0 Wall B Drywall White Good2 7 N Work Area 0 Wall C Drywall White Good3 7 N Work Area 0 Wall D Drywall White Good4 7 N Work Area 0 Closet-Door B Wood White Good5 7 N Work Area 0 Closet-Door Jamb B Wood White Good6 7 N Work Area 0 Closet-Wall 0 Drywall White Good7 7 Break Room 0 Wall A Drywall White Good8 7 Break Room 0 Wall B Drywall White Good9 7 Break Room 0.01 Wall C Drywall White Good10 7 Break Room 0 Wall D Drywall White Good11 7 Break Room 0 Baseboard A Wood Varnish Good12 7 Break Room 0 Chair Rail A Wood Varnish Good13 7 Break Room 0 Door A Wood Varnish Good14 7 Break Room 0 Door Jamb A Wood White Good15 7 SE Corner Office 0 Wall A Drywall White Good16 7 SE Corner Office 0 Wall B Drywall White Good17 7 SE Corner Office 0 Wall C Drywall White Good18 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 1 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 7 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 7 SE Corner Office 0 Wall D Drywall White Good19 7 SE Corner Office 0 Door D Wood Varnish Good20 7 SE Corner Office 0 Door Jamb D Wood White Good21 7 Center Office 0 Wall A Drywall White Good22 7 Center Office 0 Wall A Wood Tan Good23 7 Center Office 0 Wall B Drywall White Good24 7 Center Office 0 Wall B Wood Tan Good25 7 Center Office 0 Wall C Drywall White Good26 7 Center Office 0 Wall C Wood Tan Good27 7 Center Office 0 Wall D Drywall White Good28 7 Center Office 0 Wall D Wood Tan Good29 7 Center Office 0 Window-Casing A Wood Tan Good30 7 Center Office 0.1 Window-Casing A Wood Brown Good31 7 Women's Restroom 0.03 Wall A Drywall White Good32 7 Women's Restroom 0 Wall B Drywall White Good33 7 Women's Restroom 0.02 Wall C Drywall White Good34 7 Women's Restroom 0.01 Wall D Drywall White Good35 7 Women's Restroom 0.03 Wall A Ceramic Tile White Good36 7 Women's Restroom 0.01 Wall B Ceramic Tile White Good37 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 2 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 7 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 7 Women's Restroom 0.01 Wall C Ceramic Tile White Good38 7 Women's Restroom 0.03 Wall D Ceramic Tile White Good39 7 Women's Restroom 0.04 Floor A Concrete White Good40 7 Women's Restroom 0.04 Ceiling A Drywall White Good41 7 Women's Restroom 0.16 Toilet Stall C Metal Maroon Good42 7 Women's Restroom 0.16 Toilet Stall C Metal Maroon Good43 7 Women's Restroom 0 Door B Wood Varnish Good44 7 Women's Restroom 0 Door Jamb B Wood White Good45 7 Mechanical Room 0.04 Wall A Drywall Lt. Green Good46 7 Mechanical Room 0.01 Wall B Drywall Lt. Green Good47 7 Mechanical Room 0 Wall C Drywall Lt. Green Good48 7 Mechanical Room 0.04 Wall D Drywall Lt. Green Good49 7 Mechanical Room 0.01 Door B Wood Varnish Good50 7 Mechanical Room 0 Door Jamb B Wood White Good51 7 SW Work Area 0.11 Wall A Drywall White Good52 7 SW Work Area 0.12 Wall B Drywall White Good53 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 3 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 7 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number 7 SW Work Area 0.09 Wall C Concrete White Good54 7 SW Work Area 0.12 Wall D Drywall White Good55 7 SW Work Area 0.1 Wall D Drywall Beige Good56 7 Maintenance Office Exterior 0.08 Exterior-Wall C1 Concrete Tan Good57 7 Maintenance Office Exterior 0.1 Exterior-Wall D Concrete Tan Good58 7 Maintenance Office Exterior 0.7 Exterior-Door D Metal White Good59 7 Maintenance Office Exterior 0.5 Exterior-Door D Metal White Good60 7 Maintenance Office Exterior 0 Exterior-Garage D Metal White Good61 7 Maintenance Office Exterior 0.3 Exterior-Garage D Metal Tan Good62 7 Maintenance Office Exterior 0.09 Exterior-Wall C Concrete Tan Good63 7 Maintenance Office Exterior 0.09 Exterior-Wall C Concrete Tan Good64 7 Maintenance Office Exterior 0.1 Exterior-Wall B Concrete Tan Good65 7 Maintenance Office Exterior 0.07 Exterior-Wall A Concrete Tan Good66 Calibration 0 NIST 2570 White67 Calibration 0 NIST 2570 White68 Calibration 0 NIST 2570 White69 Calibration 1 NIST 2573 Red70 Calibration 1.1 NIST 2573 Red71 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 4 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 7 Salt Lake City Corporation Component ConditionRoomRoom Side XRF Result (mg/cm2)ColorSubstrate Chip Sample Result (mg/cm2) Sample Number Calibration 1.2 NIST 2573 Red72 Lead Survey Report - Table 1 Page 5 of 5 Former Fleet Yard-Building 7 Salt Lake City Corporation