The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDAQ-2024-0073191 DAQC-300-24 Site ID 12495 (B5) MEMORANDUM TO: CEM FILE – WEST VALLEY POWER THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager FROM: Rob Leishman, Environmental Scientist DATE: March 24, 2024 SUBJECT: Source: Units 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (GE LM600 Natural Gas Turbines) Contact: Jerame Blevins – 801-967-1200 ext.232 Location: 5935 West 4700 South, West Valley City, Salt Lake County, UT Test Contractor: Alliance Technical Group FRS ID#: UT0000004903500527 Permit/AO#: Title V operating permit 3500527004, dated July 12, 2019 Subject: Review of RA/PST Protocol dated March 18, 2024 On March 20, 2024, DAQ received a protocol for a RA/PST (relative accuracy/performance specification test) of the West Valley Power electrical generation facility in West Valley City, UT. Testing will be performed on June 17-21, 2024, to determine the relative accuracy of the O2, CO2, NOX, and CO monitoring systems. PROTOCOL CONDITIONS: 1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses: OK 2. RM 3A used to determine dry molecular weight of the gas stream: OK 3. RM 7E used to determine NOX concentrations of emissions: OK 4. RM 10 used to determine CO concentrations of emissions: OK 5. RM 19 used to determine volumetric flow: OK 6. RM 205 used to validate gas dilution systems for field instrument calibration: OK DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted. CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable. RECOMMENDATION: Send attached protocol review and test date confirmation notice. 1 8 2 WEST v*U.Uy POWnn March L8,2024 Director State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality * Division of Air Quality 195 North 1950 West Temple salt Lake city, uT 84116-3100 USEPA, Region Vlll Office of Enforcement, Compliance and Environmental Justice (Mail Code 8ENF) 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 UTAH DEPARruENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL OUAIJTY t'4AR ? O 2|,4 DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY Reference: West Valley Power Plant (Permit #35@527004) 2024 Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) Protocol Submittal and Test Notification Dear Director: Utah Municipal Power Agency has contracted Alliance Source Testing to conduct Relative Accuracy Test Audits (RATAs) on the continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) for five natural gas combustion turbines located at the West Valley Power Plant (Permit #3500527004). ln accordance with UAC R307,170-7(2) notice is being given that testing is scheduled to be conducted during the week beginning June L7 ,2024. For your review, please find enclosed a copy of the Source Emissions Test Protocol for conducting testing to determine the relative accuracy of the oxygen(Oz), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO) CEMS installed on each of five General Electric 1M5000 PC Sprint natural gas fired combustion turbine generators (Units 1 - 5). Should you have any questions or need additional information regarding this submittal, please contact Jerame Blevins at (801) 957-7200 ext 232. Sincerely, Ku*#afuZ Kevin G#lick Responsible Official West Valley Power Plant Enclosure CC: J. Blevins, Chris Cook & West Valley Compliance File Trinity Consultants: Melissa Armer At6rre TECHNICAL GROUP Site Specific Test PIan Utah Municipal Power Agency West Valley Power 5935 West 4700 South West Valley City, UT 841 18 Sources to be Tested: Units l-5 Proposed Test Dates: June 17-21,2024 Project No. AST-2024-177 8 Prepared By Alliance Technical Group, 3683 W 2270 S, Sui West Valley City, UTAH DEPA,RTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL OUATITY DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY NICAL Informetion Permit No. Regulatory Citations Source Informetion Sowce Name (5) General Electric Model LM600 PC Sprin! Natural Gas-Fired Simple Cycle Combustion Turbine Generaton Contect Infometion Permit 35005274o4. B, Performance Specifications 2,3 and 4 A&B Tifle V 40 cFR60, 40 CER75, ID 1 2 3 4 5 nit nit nit nit nit Target Ptaneters O2,NOx, CO oz,NOX, CO O2,NOX, CO O2,NOx, CO Ou,N0x, CO Test Compary Alliance Technical Group, LLC 3683W 2270 S, Suit€E West Valley City, UT 84120 Projec'tManager Charles Horton chades.horton@alliancetg.com (3s2) 663-7568 Field Manager Ryan Lyons ryan.lyons@allianceQ.com (708) 21,t4850 (subject to change) QA/QCManager Kdrleen Shonk katie.shonk@alliancetg.com (812) 452478s Test Plan/Report Coordinator Indah Rahmadina indah.rahmadina@alliancetg.com Test Location Utah Municipal Power Agency West Valley Power 5935 West 4700 South West Valley City, UT 841l8 Jerame Blevins jerame@umpa.energy (801) 967-1200 AST-z,a.+tTt8 Crty, UI pur6rpe Site Specific Test Plot Table ofContentsTECHNICAL GROTJP TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.0 Summary of Test Program ............ 2-l 2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded ................. ...................2-l 3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method I - Sample Point Determination........... .......................... 3-l 3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide........ .......... 3-l 3 .3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides .......... ..................... 3- I 3.4 U.S.EPAReferenceTestMethod l0-CarbonMonoxide..... ........................3-2 3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 - Mass Emission Factors ..................... 3-2 3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A,78 and 10..........................3-2 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-l: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule ......................2-2 Table 2-2: Relative Accuracy Requirements and Limits.... .................... 2-3 LIST OF APPENDICES AppendixA MethodlData Appendix B Example Field Data Sheets AST-2024-1778 West Valley Power - West Valley Crty, Uf Page ii pur6rpe TECI-1NICAt. GROI.JP Sile Specfic Test Plan Introduction 1.0 Introduction Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Utah Municipal Power Agency to conduct performance specification (PS) testing at the West Valley Power plant in West Valley City, Utah. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, PS 2, 3 and 4 and 40 CFR 75, Appendices A & B. The facility operates under the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Title V Operating permit No. 3500527004. Testing will include conducting a relative accuracy test audit (RATA) to determine the relative accuracy (RA) of the oxygen (Oz), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO) continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) installed on five (5) General Elechic Natural Gas-Fired Combustion Turbine Generators designated as Units l-5. This site-specific test plan (SSTP) has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of the UDAQ Title V permit. 1.1 Facility Descriptions West Valley Power operates five (5) General Electric Model LM600 PC Spring, Natural Gas-Fired, Simple Cycle Combustion Turbine Generators at the West Valley Generating Station. The generators are designated as Units l-5. 1.2 CEMS Descriptions Unit I Pollutant NOx Thermo 42iQLS 1200696549 Low:0-l00ppm High:0-500ppm Pollutant NOx Thermo 42iQLS 1200696550 Low:0-l00ppm High:0-500ppm Pollutant NOx Thermo 42iQLS 12006955 I Low:0-l00ppm High:0-500ppm Parameter: Make: Model: Serial No.: Span: Unil 2 Parameter: Make: Model: Serial No.: Span: Unit 3 Parameter: Make: Model: Serial No.: Span: Pollutant COIOz Thermo 48iQ 1200696s54 CO:0-10,000ppm O1.0-25%o Pollutant COIOz Thermo 48iQ 1200696ss5 CO:0-10,000ppm Oz:0-25%o P,ollutant COIOz Thermo 48iQ 1200696s56 CO: Gl0,000ppm Oz:.0-25o/o AST-202+1778 West Valley Power- West Valley City, UT Page l-l pilt6rpe TECHNICAI GROT]P Site Specific Test Plot Introduction Unit 4 Parameter: Make: Model: Serial No.: Span: Unit 5 Parameter: Make: Model: Serial No.: Span: Pollutant NOx Thermo 42iQLS 1200696552 Low:0-lOOppm High:0-500ppm Pollutant NOx Thermo 42iQLS 1200696553 Low:0-l00ppm High:0-500ppm Pollutant COIOz Thermo 48iQ 1200696557 CO:0-10,000ppm Oz:0-25o/o Pollutant COIOz Thermo 48iQ 1200696558 CO:0-10,000ppm Oz:.0-25Yo 1.3 Project Team Personnel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table. Table 1-1: Project Team 1.4 Safety Requirements Testing personnel will undergo site-specific safety training for all applicable areas upon arrival at the site. Alliance personnel will have current OSIIA or MSHA safety training and be equipped with hard hats, safety glasses with side shields, steel-toed safet5r shoes, hearing protection, fire resistant clothing, and fall protection (including shock corded lanyards and full-body harnesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves in a manner consistent with Client and Alliance's safety policies. A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader. West Valley Power Personnel Jerame Blevins Regulatory Agency UDAQ Alliance Personnel Ryan Lyons other field personnel assigned at time oftesting event AST-202+1778 West Valley Power - West Valley City, UT Page 1-2 put6rpe Ti..CllNlCAt GR()tlP Site Specfic Test Plan Summary ofTest 2.0 Summary of Test Program To satisfr the requirements of the UDAQ Title V permit, the facility will conduct a performance test program to determine the compliance status of Units l-5. 2.1 General Description All testing will be performed in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods l, 3A, TE, 10, and 19. Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program. The following is a summary of the test objectives. o Testing will be performed to demonstrate compliance with the UDAQ Title V permit, 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, PS 2, 3 and 4, and 40 CFR 75, Appendices A & B. o Emissions testing will be conducted on the exhaust of Units l-5. o Performance testing will be conducted at more than 50 percent of normal load. r Each of tho 9-12 test runs will be approximately 2l minutes in duration. 2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored rnd Recorded Plant personnel will collect operational and parametric data at least once every 15 minutes during the testing. The following list identifies the measurements, observations and records that will be collected during the testing progftlm: o Production rate - KW o Gas Flow Rate - scflt r CEMS Data 2.3 Proposed Test Schedule Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing progrirm. AST-2024-1'178 West Valley Power - West Valley City, UT PWe2-1 pilt6rpe TECHNICAL GROUP Stte Wcific Test Plot &mnry of Test Progrons Table 2-1: Progrem Outline end Tentetive Test Schedule DAY I -hne17,2024 Equipment Setup & Pretest QA/QC Checks l0 hr Unit I Oz 3A 9-12 21minNOx7E CO 10 VFR/ lbAdMBtu 19 DAY2-June 18,2024 Unit 2 Oz 3A 9-12 2l min l0 hr NOx 7E co l0 VFR/lbA,IMBtu l9 DAY3 -Jvne19,2024 Unit 3 Oz 3A 9-12 2l min l0 hr NOx 7E CO l0 \r'FR/IbA{MBtU l9 DAY4 -hllnre20,2024 Unit 4 Oz 3A 9-12 2l min l0 hr NOx TE CO t0 VFR/ lbA4MBtu t9 DAY 5 -hne21,2024 Unit 5 Oz 3A 9-12 2l min l0 hr NOx 7E CO t0 VFR/ IbNVIMBfu t9 AST-202+1778 West Valley Power- West Valley City, LfT Page2-2 AltfuTECHNICAL GROUP 2.4 Emission Limits Emission limits for each pollutant are below. Table 2-2: Reletive Requirements and Limits 2.5 Test Report The final tost report must be submitted within 60 following inform ation. of the completion of the performance test and will include the c Introductioz - Brief discussion of project of work and activities. o Results and Discussion - A summary rpsults and process/control system operational data with comparison to regulatory requirements or guarantees along with a description of process conditions and/or testing deviations that may have the testing results. o Methodologt- A description of the and analytical methodologies. for each targct parameter. electronic field data sheets. c Sample Calculations-Examplecalculati o Field Dda- Copies of actual handwritten o Quality Control Data- Copies of all instru o Process Oryrating/Control System Data- calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates. operating and control system data (as provided by West Valley Power) to support the test results. 60, Appendix B, PS 3or * I o/oOz Units l-5 or d<0.7o/oOz T5,AppendixA&B 100 ppmvd @l5o/oOz; 7.41b/hr 60, Appendix B, PS 2or<10 % (AS) or d < 0.015 T5,AppendixA&B or <5 Yo (AS) or 10 ppmvd @l5o/oOz; 8.75lb/hr West Valle,y - West Valley City, UT Page 2-3 tl B Site Specific Test Plan Testing Melhodolog) 3.0 Testing Methodologr This section provides a description of the sampling and analytical procedures for each test method that will be employed during the test program. All equipment, procedures and quality assurance measures necessary for the completion of the test program meet or exceed the specifications of each relevant test method. The emission testing progr.rm will be conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-l. Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodolory All stack diameters, depths, widths, upstream and downstream disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be measured on site with an EPA Method I verification measurement provided by the Field Team Leader. These measurements will be included in the test report. 3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method I - Sample Point Determination The sampling location will be evaluated in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l. The upstream and downstream distances will be measured and equated to equivalent diameters to confirm compliance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l. 3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide The oxygen (Oz) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A.. Data will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist of a stainless steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line is used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6. The relative accuracy of the Oz CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 75, Appendices A & B and 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 3. 3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E. Data will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist of a stainless steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line is used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6. Orygen / Carbon Dioxide Volumetric Flow Rate / Mass Emission Factors Fuel Factors / Heat Inputs AST-202+1778 West Valley Power- West Valley City, UT Page 3-l put6rpe Site Specific Test Plan Testing MethodologtI L L]IINICAi Gti(.)trP The relative accuracy of the NOx CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 75, Appendices A & B and 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 2. 3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10 - Carbon Monoxide The carbon monoxide (CO) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10. Data will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist of a stainless steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system, and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line is used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6. The relative accuracy of the CO CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, Performance Specifi cation 4. 3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 - Volumetric Flow Rate / Mass Emission Factors The gas volumetric flow rate will be determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 using the measured oxygen concentration, the published fuel factor, a calibrated gas meter and the fuel heating value. The pollutant concentrations will be converted to mass emission factors flb[\{MBtu) using procedures outlined in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19. The published dry 02 based fuel factor (F-Factor) of 8,710 dscflMMBtu for natural gas will be used in the calculations. 3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A, 7E and 10 Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol 1 (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report. Low Level gas will be introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas concentration and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will be recorded. This process will be repeated for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration gases will be sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. The Calibration Error for each gas must be within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmvlYo absolute difference. High or Mid-Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppm/%o (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas concentration will be recorded. The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value, and this value will be recorded. Next, Low-Level gas will be introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppm/% (whichever was less restrictive) will be recorded. If the Low- Level gas is zero gas, the acceptable response must be 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration or 0.5 ppmlYo (whichever was less restrictive). The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value, and this value will be recorded. The measurement system response time and initial system bias will be determined from these data. The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference. High or Mid-Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be introduced at the probe. After the analyzer response is stable, the value will be recorded. Next, Low-Level gas will be introduced at the probe, and the analyzer value will be recorded once it reaches a stable response. The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0 AST-2024-1778 West Valley Power- West Valle.v City, UT Page3-2 pul6rpEr IL a-)rll.l ialAi r. [-.] () i i'F-' Site Specific Test Plan Testing Methodologt percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/o/o absolute difference or the data is invalidated, and the Calibration Error Test and System Bias must be repeated. The Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias must be within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference or the Calibration Error Test and System Bias must be repeated. To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check will be conducted prior to initiating testing. The pollutant concentrations will be measured at twelve traverse points (as described in Method 1) or three points (16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each traverse point will be sampled for a minimum of twice the system response time. If the pollutant concentration at each traverse point do not differ more than 5% or 0.5 ppmlO.3o/o (whichever is less restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling will be conducted during the test runs. If the pollutant concentration does not meet these specifications but differs less than lDoh or I .0 ppm/O.5% from the average concenffation, then three (3) point sampling will be conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - 16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter- 0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters from the stack wall). If the pollutant concentration differs by more than l0% or 1.0 ppm/O.5%ofrom the average concentration, then sampling will be conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse points. Copies of stratification check data will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report. An NOz- NO converter check will be performed on the analyzer prior to initiating testing. Mid-level nitrogen oxide protocol I calibration gas will be mixed at a l:l ratio with span level protocol I oxygen calibration gas in a Tedlar sample bag to form NOz gas. The NOz gas will be delivered to the nitrogen oxides analyzer directly from a Tedlar sample bag. The response of the analyzer must be stable for the 30-minute duration of the test with the variation less than 2.0o/o at the end of the test from the maximum value of the test. A Data Acquisition System with battery backup will be used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute averages. The data will be continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the completion of testing, the data will also be saved to the Alliance server. All data will be reviewed by the Field Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data will be relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review will be performed by the Project Manager. AST-2024-1778 West Valley Power* West Valley City, UT Page 3-3 pill6rpe I Lrt_lllNi(- Ai i_:flt.llti.Site Specific Test Plan Quality Assurorce P rogram 4.0 Quality Assurance Program Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality Conhol Management Plan to ensure the continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme. Adherence to prescribed procedures is quite often the most applicable QC check. 4.1 Equipment Field test equipment is assigned a unique, permanent identification number. Prior to mobilizing for the test program, equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipment problems prior to arriving on site. This minimizes lost time on the job site due to equipment failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is unavoidable despite the most rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures. Therefore, replacements for critical equipment or components are brought to the job site. Equipment returning from the field is inspected before it is returned to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and recalibrated where necessary. Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. The calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA-600/R-94/038I, September 1994) are utilized. When these methods are inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recognized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked for completeness and accuracy. Copies of calibration forms are included in the report. The following sections elaborate on the calibration procedures followed by Alliance for these items of equipment. Barometer. The barometric pressure is obtained from a nationally recognized agency or a calibrated barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field trip against a mercury barometer. The barometer is acceptable if the values agree within + 2 percent absolute. Barometers not meeting this requirement are adjusted or taken out of service. Other Eguipment. A mass flow controller calibration is conducted on each Environics system annually following the procedures in the Manufacturer's Operation manual. A methane/ethane penetration factor check is conducted on the total hydrocarbon analyzers equipped with non-methane cutters every six (6) months following the procedures in 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ. Other equipment such as probes, umbilical lines, cold boxes, etc. are routinely maintained and inspected to ensure that they are in good working order. They are repaired or replaced as needed. 4.2 Field Sampling Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test method(s). General QC measures for the test program include: o The sampling port will be sealed to prevent air from leaking from the port. o All raw data will be maintained in organized manner. . All raw data will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability. AST-2024-1778 West Valley Power - West Valley City, UT Pa4e 4-l A6rr Iedoo Ut* soomlrd Method L Data lAlrc6 Irrd (H,.aaalr: Vdi..l Di.llrritr CnEh Itbh..AoalrrwdloMd.ollolt! l't.f h I{IDLLqt. ll.?' bDa(rdhr:!!!q_h Clorlt.dmrf AuolDtd! lf3.r0 If Nq ol Ld lorr$ _.,:l__Diare* 7.0 lr D&le A DBr DaElfrr 0.5 (El Dr > 0.5) D(,e& 633 tt Dl*& B h D&hD: --jll(@. D. >2) A.rrlNdsdTilmltfur 3 Lb-- ---b ----L I Dtr(:f ,tudrwpotu6. Dt tls htu l*l*EFl+l I , 3 a t 5 1 t, l0 lt t, 76(l,llta t,1.6 16.7 6.7 - 44 t5t 50.0 25.0 - 11.6 - t33 ?10 - D.6,$ 1na $'' . 95.6 - .2-2.6-Lt r.r-t.2-6.1 ).{-11.6-ll.tt.t-/t,5-',.7 t,7 - 3a.2 2t.O ).5-6r.!-rr. t.5 - Tr.t, - a.1 i.t-Et.a-75.o 9t.t - a3::'::g: vt9 ffi Pht, Cror S.diolAH S..tDi.trr A- 7t1. B-63ft. u- la4ir A/rfu Method I Data IftdioD Ui.h Sorro D*l Oridlrrionr Vdidl Dud D$igtr: Circu.l{ NimL langh: 11.75 lo D.pthofDucr: 144.00 tn Crc$Sdioo.lAdofDudt 113 10 ft, No- of T.d Potu: 4 oi*mc,r:---Ji'-t Dirte A IrrA IX@tc6: 0.6 (mat b. > 0O Di$uce B: 63.0 ft Dlilrc B lhd DimtcB: 53 (mut bc > 2) Acud N@fi.r d TmcE. Poifr: l LOCATION OT TRAVENSE PIOINTS Ntilbqoffr$as.poift@afiM I 3 1 5 6 1 t 9 t0 il t2 2 {5 6 E 9 l0 lt l2 t4.6 t6.7 6.7 - 4.4 - 3.2 - 2.6 - 2.1 85.4 50.0 25.0 - 14.6 - 10.5 - 8.2 - 6.7 - 83.3 75.0 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 14.5 - ll.8" : : . [' ri'fi,;i Trtvana Poiil v.6 Di.te@ fDm Di,mter nrll ouBidc oI I 3 4 6 1 t 9 l0 il 16,7 50.0 '1', : 24.05 72.00 I 1995 : 35.80 83.75 I3L70 : Suct Di!8m A= 7fl B=63ft. Dcpth oflrst = 144 in. CrGs Sdti@l Asa Upsalm Disurb.ne AFre Method I Data ndtrndo:_lEE!_ hllcrltf Ciwlr D.0.loaH: 1,1.1.00 h cE s.frd Am oaDoar_!!!r!!_f iGdlsalrl&_ji_ Dtr.e A: 7.0 tr DIEAIIdDGT! 0.6 (dlE Dail&f,! 63.0 n DhethDtrerrg(Ei ba>2) Adrd N6b6dTm !ert-_L t,d* vdl b nfirE Polnt, ffi 6.7 il.t 17.7 2t.0 35.6 a.1 75.0 &.3 rE2 93.3 a2 la.5 t2.6 42 65.t 7r.1 at.4 9t.t ": 3.2 10.5 19.4 32.t 67.7 t0.6 a).5 4.4 14.6 29.6 70.4 ar.4I. :_ 6.7 2t.o 75.0 t6.7 50.0 "j 11.6 15l Urca..n Dlort E Trffi hh 'A ol Dlffd Itaire hmiltl ral n!6 .ddi.C I 2, 1 t 6 7 I 9 10 1l 16.7 50.0oj a u.05 72.00 ,t:rt : 35.4) t3.?t o:, i A/tfu Method I Data Ieibn Ulrh Ihd Orlcotdi@: Vdi.d Iroci lhritd Circals DirtefrcnFrWrItoOdid.ofPon: t55.75 tn Nipplclinsth: 11.75 in Irrpttoflhd: 144.00 iD crc$ SdirodAsof ltrd: lt3.l0 d No.ofTdPoro 4 IrituA: 7.0 ft Diilre A IhE llirmh: 0.6 (dM b. > 0.O Di$ae B: 63.0 ft lridre B lhd lri.dcn: 53 (6url br > 2) Acul Nmbcr oil Tnvem Poim: 3 LOCATION OT TRAWf,SB FOINTS Ntilba oJt@dse poi* N a difu I 2 3 4 5 6 1 E 9 10 11 6345 1 E 9 lo It t2 - 4.4 - 3.2 - 14.6 - 10.5 - 29.6 - 19.4 - 70.4 - 32.3 - 85.4 - 67.7 - 95.6 - 80.6 _ 89.5 ....' 14.6 t6.7 6.7 85.4 50.0 25.0 - a3.3 75.0 93.3 2.6 8.2 14.5 22.6 34.2 65.t 7t.4 85.4 91.8 t_, 6.7 u.8 t1.1 25.0 35.6 64.4 75.0 82.3 88.2 93.3 979 ThrtBa Poiil o/. ol Ilirmtcr IrirtMc. llmisldr Brll lrcm ouaid. of I 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 It l2 t6.7 50.0 1' u.o5 72.00 I 1995 t3.15 l3 t.70 Diaru A= 7n. S=63n. DepthofD0ct= l,l4in. CrcsS@ti@lAM Upftam Di4urbr@ Method I Data ld6rUra 8rc Dr.ad.-& Vcdrl ED!dr[-.,19!sL Dlrarc*IbE lrSI a Ma. laftd:J|jllE-f lqrl.t"qft_!!Lr D#{aDr.f laa.00 f Crr.r gccllrJlHCDt.t_l.!l!g-ff I{e.dlaallrl, a Dlo..A: ,.0 i lxrarr.AD!.rudfi 0,5 db>a.O DhG.lD.tDd.m 53 Fah>A A.rrdl{*olrm l!h$_j!_ .Pavst d:td. ld'r,.te bffiro&t. Dhs!. 6r.0 i 80uRCE 1'EEtrNO l'ffi hL *d Dle DfuIrHd ilI ilo .dara I,, a 3 a 1 t, la 1l L6.:' ,0.0 Y : 21.N 72t0 rr::et : : ,r.a t3.A I3LM : : 5.1 ll.t t7-7 2:t! ,t.5 4.1 75,0 ta3 It: 3 4.2 tl.6 b.6 v2 66.t n.1 &r.4 9l.t ": 6.7 25.0 ,5.0 ? : rr.,l ,0.0 - &1.3 Ur.crmd&rt E pJ/l6rrEE)02 Summary Location: - - - Source: -- Project No.: -- Run No.Date Time Rcfcrencc Method O: Concentration o/"dw CEMS 0u Concentration ohdw Average Differcncc o/" ilrtStartEnd I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 ll t2 2fi3/24 2fi3t24 2/13t24 2t13t24 2fi3t24 2t13n4 atln4 2/13t24 2t13t24 2/13124 uttn4 at3D4 Averasr Standard Deviation (Sd Applicable Source Standard (AS Confi dence Coeffi cient (CCl Relative Accuracy (RAl Performance Required - Mean Reference Method RA<2U/o Performance Specifi cation Method PS3 Confidence Coefficient, CC cc = lto'gt * sallVn I whcre, to.rrr-.....sA- n0sd- CC = degrees offreedom value = number of runs selected for calculating the RA = standard deviation ofdifhrence = confidence coefficient Relative Accurecy, RA ldl+lcclRA = 7r;ffix1oo where, d _= average difference of Refrrence Method and cEMS CC _: confidence coefficient RM _ : reference meth od, oh dry RA = relative accurary, oZ NOx SummaryIEE)Frcr j, AI Locetion: -- - -- Source: -- Project No.: * Run No.Date Time Reference Method NOx Concentration nnmvd CEMS NOx Concentration nnmvd Average Difference nnmvdStartEnd I 1 j 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 ll t2 )t 2l 2/ 2/ 2t ,t 2t 2/ 3/24 3/24 3/24 3/24 3D4 3124 3/24 3124 3/24 3124 3D4 3/24 Averagr Standard Deviation (Sd Applicable Source Standard (AS Confidence Coeffi cient (CC Bias Adiustment Required (BA No Bias Adjustment Factor (BAI L000 Relative Accuracy (RA) - Hide Rou Relative Accuracy (RA Performance Required - Mean Reference Methor RA < 20% ICAOMD RECI-AIM CRITERIA: Does source Qualifr as low Emitter? RM average < 5 ppmv<No Altemative Criteria for Low Emitter per R2012-Chapter 2, Eq. 9c: Is ldl+lccl < I ppmv #VALUE! ldl+lcc #VALUE! Performance Specifi cation Metho<PS2 #vAl-uEl Confidence Coeflicient CC cc = lto'zt, sallVn I where, to.orr1[= degrees of fieedom value ng= number of runs selected for calculating the RA Sd = standard deviation ofdifference CC -= confidence coefficient Relative Accuracy, RA ldl+lcclRA = 7s;;;r:x1oo where, d = average difference of Reference Method and CEMS CC -= confidence coefficient RM-= reference method, ppmvd RA = relative accuracy, o% pJ/l6r1rce -4.'il'.1 , :,l- {lF, l-' CO Summary Locetion: - - -- Source: - Project No.: - Run No.Datc Time Rcfcrcncc Mcthod CO Concentration nnmvd CEMS C0 Concentration oomvd Average Difference nnmvdStrrlEnd I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 ll t2 ',I )l' )l 2/ )l 1t 2/ 1t 3124 3/24 3D4 3t24 3t24 3124 3124 3124 3/24 3t24 3t24 3t24 Averagr Standard Deviation (Sd Applicable Source Standard (AS Confi dence Coefficient (CCl Bias Adiustnrent Required (BAl No Bias Adiustment Factor (BAFI I 000 Rclativc Accuracv (RA) - Hide Row Relative Accurtcy (RAl Performance Required - Mean Reference Method RA< l0% Performance Specifi cation Method PS 4A Alternetive Relative Accuracy (RAl #VALUEI Altemative Performance Required (d + CC <5ppm Performance Specrfi cation Method PS 4A' #VALUEI Conlidence Coefficien1 CC cc = lto'It , sallVn I where, t0.e75 #N/A = degrees offreedom value n 0 = number ofruns selected for calculating the RA sd-: standard deviation of difference CC = confidence coefficient Relative Accuracy, RA ldl+lcclPn = ----. --:-----: x 100 where, d = average difference of Reference Method and CEMS cc -= confidence coefficient RM-= reference method, ppmvd RA = relative accuracy, oZ pllt6rre TECHNICAL GROIJP Sourcc: - Runl-RMData Projet Nor - Ot-OudGt COr-Oudct CO-Outlct %drV %er ppwd NOt.Odc{ ppffid Urcoretid Ru! Avcnge (Cd) C.l Gu Clmdntio (CMA) Prctcrt Sy.t6 ro Rcaporl. Porttort Syrtm Zao lerpre Avcrrgc Zao Rapre (Co) Prctst Syltm Cd Rspore Pottst Syrtm Cd R6porr! Avcrge Cr! Rarporle (CM) TECHN Alrfure Data ICAL GROUP Locrtton - - -sourccT- ProteotNo.F QA Prremctcr Or-nflct COh- Ouflct CO-Outu N(lr - ()ufl.{ Mekc Modcl s/N Oocntins Rensc Cytindcr II) bro Low Mid IIieh I I\ NA NA NA Y NA NA Cylinder Ccr{fed Yelucs 7*ro Low Mid Ifich I\ l NA Y NA Y NA Y Cyltndcr Expirafion Dete 7*to LOW Mid TIfuh I l l \ NA Y NA Y NA Y fvoe of Semnle Linc rIATEE! . '_.:. I :r ..i: AI Calibration Data Locetion: -- - -- Source: -- Project No.: -- Datez 2ll3l24 Parameter O, - Outlet CO: - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet Exoected Averase Concentration Span Between Low High Desired Soan Low Range Gas Low Hish NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Mid Range Gas Low Hioh High Range Gas Low Hish NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Actual Concentration (7o or ppm) 7*ro Low Mid Hieh 0.00 r1 0.00 il 0.00 Y 0.00 Y Response Time (seconds) Upscale Calibration Gas (Cur) Instrument Response (7o or ppm) 7*ro Low Mid Hish NA NA NA NA Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.) Zero Low Mid Hish NA NA NA NA 7*ro Low Mid Hieh NA NA NA NA BiaslDrift Determinations Locetion: -- - -- Source: -- Project No,: - Parameter Oz - Outlet COz - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet Run I Date 2ll3l24 Span Value Initial Instrumenl Zero Cal Response Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest Svstem Upscale Response #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Bias (%) Pretest Zero Posffest Zero Pretest Span Posttest Soan Drift (7o) Zero Mid Run 2 Date 2ll3l24 Span Value Instrument Zero Cal Response lnstrument Upscale Cal Response Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest System Upscale Response #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Bias (7d Pretest Zero Posttest Zero Pretest Span Posttest Soan Drift(%) Zero Mid Run 3 Date 2ll3l24 Span Value Instrument Zero Cal Response Instrument Upscale Cal Response Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest System Upscale Response #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Bias (7o) Pretest Zero Posttest Zero Pretest Span Posttest Snan Drift (7o) Zero Mid plll6rpe :lAI i:[.:i 1-\i]P Location: -- - -- Project No.: -- NO2 Converter Check - Outlet Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Serial Number Cylinder ID Number Cylinder Exp. Date Cvlinder Concentratiotr, DDrtr Pre.Test Date Time PreTestcoo""r,tli-tion,ppm Pre.TestEfriciencv. To .T Post-Test Date Time Post-Test Coo"uoIilffif,. Post-TestElficiency. To .T is > 90 ?6'.{. whcre, plltfure TECl-INICAL GROUP Locrtlon: --- Sourcc: - Projcct No: - Run No lDIGtrodR Or - Ortlc,tconccntntlon (CoJ, % dry Co,= (Co,-Co). ( #;) Co5, - =avcrag€anallzer c" : = a\r€ragc of pretestcr{,{.-FfF=actual: avcrage ofpretest = O: ConcenEation, during tcs! 7o dry postt€st zero responses, 7o dry of calibratiou gas, o/o &y posttcst calibration responso*, o/o dry dry C^rT coh: pultfure TECHNICAL GROUP Locrtion: - - - Source: - Proicct No.: - Run No. /MethodRun I / Method l0 CO - Outlct Concentretion (Cco), ppmvd cco= (co5o-cs)x 1 ffil) where'Couo average analyzer value during t€st, ppmvdq:= average of,pretest & postlest zcro responses, ppmvd C1.1,r.TF[7f = actual concentation of calibrationgrg, ppmvd CrT= average of protest & posttest calibration rcsponses, ppmvd c-"o T: Co Concentation, ppmvd I,TAH DEPAH'TMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL OUAUTY li,lAn 2 0 2nt4 DIVISION OF AIR QUALIT1 Projcct No.:1 Run No. /ltlcthodRrm I / NOr - Ouflct Conentnfon (Cno,)' ppmvd cro.= (c05.-cs)x t"lF"rl wtcrc, q-= avorage of Prctcst CM,{ --t[77[-- actual concehtati, CM--= Oreragc of p'retest C.r* T = Nox Concentrati< &ningtest, ppmvd posttsst zerc rcsponsos, ppmvd of calibrarim gas, ppmvd posttest calibrdion rtsponses, ppmvd ppmvd