DAQ-2024-007313

1

DAQC-291-24
Site ID 10725 (B5)
MEMORANDUM

TO: CEM FILE – CLEAN HARBORS ARAGONITE, LLC

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Rob Leishman, Environmental Scientist

DATE: March 22, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: Incineration System (INC)
Contact: William Simmons – 435-844-8351
Location: 11600 North Aptus Road, Aragonite, Tooele County, UT
Test Contractor: Alliance Technical Group
FRS ID#: UT00000049004500048
Permit/AO#: Title V operating permit 450004004 dated November 23, 2021
Subject: Review of RA/PST Protocol dated March 19, 2024

On March 19, 2024, DAQ received a protocol by email for a RA/PST (relative accuracy/performance
specification test) of the Clean Harbors Aragonite INC in Aragonite, UT. Testing will be performed on
May 7, 2024, to determine the relative accuracy of the THC, O2, CO2, NOX, SO2, and CO monitoring
systems.

PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:

1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses: OK
2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate: OK
3. RM 3A used to determine dry molecular weight of the gas stream: OK
4. RM 4 used to determine moisture content: OK
5. RM 6C used to determine SO2 emissions: OK
6. RM 7E used to determine NOX concentrations of emissions: OK
7. RM 10 used to determine CO concentrations of emissions: OK
8. RM 25A used to determine total gaseous organic concentration by flame ionization
detector: OK

DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted.

CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: Send attached protocol review and test date confirmation notice.

1 8 2
leanHa
6
RE
Clean Harbors Aragonire, LLC
I 1600 Nonh Aptus Road
Aragonire, UT 84029
435.884.8100
www.cleanharbors.com
Submitted via FedEx #8181 54005888
March 19.2024
Mr. Bryce Bird
Division of Air Quality (DAQ)
Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144880
Salt Lake ciry, uT 84411-4880
Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)
Clean Harbors Aragonite, LLC
Title V Operating Permit 45000,18001
Dear Mr. Bird.
In accordance with Utah Administrative Code (UAC) R307- 170-7, Clean Harbors Aragonite,
LLC is notifuing the Utah Department of Air Quality of the upcoming Relative Accuracy Test
Audit (RATA) scheduled to take place May 7,2024. Enclosed is a copy of the RATA Plan for
review. A copy was also emailed to Mr. Robert Leishman Jr. via email.
In accordance with Permit Condition I.K and Utah Administrative Code R307-415-5d, I certifu
under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direct
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based upon my inquiry of persons or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information submitted
is. to the best of my knowledge and beliel true, accurate and complete. I am aware thal there are
significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of imprisonment for
known violations.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at the number listed
below.
" People and Technologt L'reating a Better Environment"
S
(,=\
William Simmons
Facility General Manager III
Clean Harbors Aragonite, LLC
1 1600 North Aptus Road
PO Box 1339
Grantsville. Utah 84029- I 339
(o) 435.884.8351
(c) 870.310.6029
[e-mail]
www.cleanharbors.com
Attu
Clean Harbors Aragonite LLC
I1600 N. Aptus Road
Aragonite. UT 84029
Source to be Tested: Incinerator System (lNC)
RATA - Oz, CO:, SO:, NOx, CO & THC
Proposed Test Date: May 7 ,2024
Pro.lect No. AST-2024-15 17
Prepared By ..i
Alliance Technical Croup. IS
3683 W 2270 S. Suite,Si$i
west Vallev cirv. urm
TECHNICAL GFIOUP
Site Specific Test Plan
tAI
TECHNICAL GROUP Site Srycilic Test Plan
Test Prcgran ynnary
Regulatory Information
Regulatory Cildtions
Source ltrformation
Utah Depanment of Environmental Quality ( DEQ), Division of Air Quality
(DAQ) Title V Operating Permit 4500048004
40 CFR 60. Performance Specifications 2,3.4/4A,6, and 8A
Sorrce Name
Incineration System
Source lD
lNc
R17,1 Parameters
VFR, O:, CO:, SO:, NOx, CO, THC
(lontect Informelion
Test Lacation
Clean Harbors Aragonite LLC
I 1600 N. Aptus Road
Aragonite, UT 84029
Manager, Maintenance
Cody Parks
[e-mail]
[phone]
Test ('onpanl'
Alliance Technical Croup, LLC
3683 W 2270 S- Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
[phone]
Field Team Leader
Tobias Hubbard
[e-mail]
(605) 645-E562
(subject to change)
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
karie.shonk@allianc€tg.com
(812\ 452-4785
Test Plan/Repon Coordinator
lndah Rahmadina
[e-mail]
Regulatory Agency
Utah DAQ
195 Nonh 1950 West
Sak Lalie City, UT 841 16
Environmental Health Scientisr
Rob Leishman Jr.
[e-mail]
(80r ) 536-4438
asT-2024-1517 Clean llarhors - Aragonhe. UT Page r
pdlt6tre
N CAL GROUP
1'ABLE OF COITE\TS
1.0
Ll
t.2
1.3
1.4
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.4
2.5
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.10
4.0
4.t
4.2
Process/Control System Descriptiorls
CEMS Descriptions
Project Team ..........
Safety Requirements...
Summary of Test Program...
l-l
.................. l-l
.................. I -l
.................. I -2
.................. I -2
Ceneral Description .
2-l
2-t
.....2-l
)-)
)-)
................. 2_3
).2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Reco.ded
Proposed Test Schedule
Relative Accuracy Requirements................
U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides........
U.S. EPA Refercnce Test Method l0 Carbon Monoxide......
U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A - Total Hydrocarbons
Method 1 Data
Example Field Data Sheets
U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Samplingfiraverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate.....3-l
U.S. EPA Ref€rence Test Method 3A Oxyger/Ca$on Dioxide...........................................................3- I
3-2
U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 6C Sultlr Dioxide 3-2
........................... 3-2
......'..'.,..,.,..,.,,.,.. 3 -2
U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification............................
Quality Assurance/Quality Control U.S. EPA Reference Test Melhods 34, 6C, 7E and 10.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A ....
Quality Assurance Program
Equipment..-...
Field Sampling......
LIS'T OF TABLES
..............3-3
3-3
34
4-t
................... 4-l
......4-2
Table l-l: Project I eam ....,...,..
Table 2- l: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule ..............
Table 2-2: Relative Accuracy Requirements and Limits...............,
I-ISI' OF APPENDICES
............... l-2
...............2-2
............... 2-3
............... 3- l
AST-202.1-t5t7 Clean Harbors Aragonrle. UT Pag. ll
'rErr St,e Spcfic Tes Plan
Table olContents
U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 Moisture Content.....
Table 3-l : Source Testing Methodo1o9y...................
Appendix A
Appendix B
F--t--Alhtpe
N AL GROUP S,te Specfic Test Plan
lntroduction
1.0 lltroductiotr
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Clean Harbors Aragonite, LLC (Clean Harbors) 10
conduct performance specification (PS) tesring at the Aragonite, Utah facility. Portions ofthe facility are subject to
provisions of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, PS 2, 3, 44 and 8A and the Utah Department of Environmental Quality
(UDEQ) Ttle V Operation Permit No. 4500048004. Testing will include conducting a relative accuracy tesr audits
(RATA) to determine the relative accuracy (RA) of the oxygen (Or), carbon dioxide (COr), sulfur dioxide (SO:),
nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO) and total hydrocarbons (THC) primary, secondary and backup
continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) and the volumetric flow rate (VFR) continuous emissions rale
monitoring syslem (CERMS) serving to monitor emissions liom the incineration system (lNC). The RATAs will be
conducted to demonstrate compliance with the UDEQ Permit and 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, PS 2, 3, 4/4A, 6 and 8A.
l.l Process/ControlSystemDescriptiols
The permitted source is a commercial hazardous waste treatment, storage. and disposal facility (TSDF). Hazardous
waste is received from various sources including refineries, chemical manufacturing plants, and coke by-product
recovery plants. The off-site material management unit at the source includes sixteen liquid waste storage and
blending tanks, two sludge tanks, three bulk solids tanks, and several container management buildings. Wasle from
the off-site material management unit is treated in an incinerator which includes primary and secondary chambers.
The incinerator control system includes a spray dryer, carbon injection, baghouse. saturator, and wet scrubber.
1.2 CEMS Descriptions
(IEMS #l (Primary)
Parameter;co CO:SO:0::\()\THC
N4ake Servomex Servomex Thermo Thermo
Model :1900 .1900 42i-HL 5 t i-TH
Serial No.:653204 4021 061.1: t6781 1434964304
Span:0-200 ppm (low)0-20 0/o 0-500 ppm 0-15 o/o 0- 1,000 ppm 0- 100 ppnr
CEMS #2 (Secondar!')
Parameter:CO CO:SO:O:\or THC
Nlake Servomex Servomex Thermo Thermo
]V odel ,1900 .1900 42i-HL 5l i-TH
Serial No.:65.i305 4022 06t4216783 t20i299856
Span 0-200 ppm (low)0-20 Yo 0-500 ppm 0-25 o/o 0-1.000 ppm 0- 100 Dpm
CEMS #3 (Backup - #2 Spare)
Parameter:CO CO:SOr Ot NOr TH('
Make:Servomex Servomex Thermo
Model .1900 1900 42i-HL 5 I i-TH
Serial No 653205 652525 0836633949 1203299855
Span:0-200 ppm (low)0-20 0/.0-500 ppm 0-25 0/o 0-1.000 ppm 0-100 ppm
ASl-2024-15t7 Clean Harbors - Amgonrte. UT
This site-specific test plan (SSTP) has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of the
UDEQ permit.
Thermo
Page l-l
tAI
TECI{NICAL GBOUP
VFR FT2I95
Prrameter:Flow Rate
Make:Rosemount
Model 3051
Serial No.:036061752
Span
13 Project Team
Personnel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table
Table l-I: Project Team
Clean Harbors Personnel Cody Parks
Regulatory Agency Rob Leishman Jr. - UDAQ
Alliance Personnel Tobias Hubbard
other field personnel assigned at time oftesting event
1.4 SafetyRequirements
Testing personnel will have current OSHA or MSHA safety training and be equipped with hard hats, safety glasses
with side shields, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fire resistant clothing, and fall protection (including
shock corded lanyards and full-body hamesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves in a manner consistent
with Clienr and Alliance's safety policies.
A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader.
AST-2024-l5t 7 Clean Harbors Aragonile, UT Page l -2
S e Spectlic Test Plan
ldrcduction
putfure
Ste Specirtc Test Plan
&mnan ofTest Prugrans
2.0 Summary of Test Program
To satisfo the requirements of the UDEQ permit, the facility will conduct this performance test program to
determine the RA of the O:, CO:, SO:, NOx, CO and THC primary, secondary, and backup CEMS and the VFR
CERMS serving to monitor emissions from thc INC.
2.1 CenerslDescriptiotr
All testing will be performed in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods l,2,
3A,4,6C,7E, 10,and25A. Table 2- l presents an outline and tontativ€ schedule for $e emissions testing program.
The following is a summary ofthe test objectives.
Emissions testing will be conducted at the control system exhaust stack for the incineration unit.
The RATA of the primary, secondary and backup CEMS will be conducted simultaneously \xhile the
source is operating at a normal representative load.
PS 2,3,4A.,6. and 8A will be used to determine the RA ofthe CEMS.
A minimum of nine (9), 2l-minute test runs will be conducted to measure emission concentrations of O:,
CO:, SO:, NOx, CO and THC. Concunently measured volumetric flow rate (VFR) will be used to calculate
NOx mass emission rates in units ofpounds per hour (lb,&r). Stack gas velocity traverses will be conducred
once per test run. A moisture (BWS) sampling period will span I to 3 or more test runs.
Emissions for each anal)te will be reponed as follows - O: and CO: - o/ovd; SOr ppmvd, ppmvd @7"/o
O:; NOx ppmvd, lb/hr; CO - ppmvd, ppmvd @ 1o/o O:, THC ppmvw, ppmvd @ 7% O:. and vFR -
actual cubic feet per minute (acfm).
Due to observed fluctuations in the diluent and pollutant concentrations, a stratification check may not be
conducted for the test progam, as waived in 2017 by UDAQ. Sampling will be conducted from a single
sample point for Methods 3A, 4, 78, l0 and 25A.
Bias and driff checks may be conducted after every three (3).2l-minute test runs in accordance with
Method 7E, Section 8.5
Ifnecessary, to calculate a CEMS RA, an emission standard will be back calculated from the concentration
or mass emission rate limit using the average rgferenca method measurements for O:, moisture (HrO)
and/or volumetric flow rate.
2.2 Process/Cotrtrol System Parameters to b€ Monitored arld Recorded
Plant personnel will collect operational and parametric data at least once every l5 minutes during the testing. The
following list identifies the measurements, observations and records $at will be collected during the testing
program:
OtlCOl Yo dry
SO: - ppmvd, ppmv d @ 7o/" O?
NOx - ppmvd, lb/hr
CO - ppmvd, ppmvd @ 7% O:
THC ppmvw, ppmvd@1YoOt
VFR - acfm
AST-2024-1517 Page 2-l
TECHNICAL GFIOUP
Clean Harbo6 Aragonrte. UT
FAITECHNICAL GBOUP Site Spec6c Test Plan
SunnwD ofTest Proxrans
23 Proposed Test Schedule
Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program
Table 2-l; Program Outline and TeIttative Test Schedule
2.4 RelativeAccuracyRcquiremerts
The required R-{ for each CEMS is listed in Table 2-2. RA will be determined by using either the mean reference
method (RM) or applicable source standard (AS). lfnecessary, to calculate a CEMS RA, an emission standard will
be back calculated from the concentration or mass emission rate limit using the average reference meihod
measuremsnls for Or. BWS and,/or VFR.
DAY I May 6.2024
Equipment Setup & Pretesl QA/QC Checks 6hr
DAY 2 May 7.2024
VFR t-2 9- 12 --5 min
BWS ,l 63 min
O:/CO:-lA
SO:6C
NOx 7E
CO t0
Incineration System
Stack
Primary, Secondary
& Backup CEMS
THC 25_4
9-t2 21 min
l0 hr
DAY 3 - May 8, 2024
Finish RATA Testing ( ifneeded)
DAY .l May 9, 2024
Contingency Day (if neededl
AST-2024-1517 Clean HarboB Aragonite. UT Page 2-2
I
Testitrg Location Parameter US EPA :Uethod No. of Rutrs RuD Duratiotr Est. Onsite
Time
tATECHNICAL GROUP Stte SFctJic Test Plan
Smnaa^ of Test PtoPrams
Table 2-2: Relative Accuracy Requirements and Limits
2.5 Test Report
The final test repon must be submifted within 60 days ofthe completion ofthe performance test and will include the
following information.
. lntroduction - grief discussion ofproject scope ofwork and activilies.
o Results and Discussion A summary of test results and process/control system operational data with
comparison to regulatory requirements or vendor guarante€s along with a description of process conditions
and/or testing deviations that may have affected the testing results.
o Methodolog - A description ofthe sampling and analytical methodologies.
. Sqmple Calculqticlns - Example calculations for each target parameter,
. Field Ddta - Copies ofactual handwritten or electronic field data sheets.
. Qudlity ControlDala Copies ofall instrument calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates.
. Pr.Eess Operating,Control System Data - Process operating and mntrol sy$em data (as provided by Clean
Harbors) to suppon the test results.
60. Appendix B, PS 6VFR<20 o/" (RM)
60. Appendix B, PS 3o:<20 % (RM)OR r I %Ol
60. App€ndix B. PS 3CO:<20 % (RM) OR r I o/o COr
9l ppmvd @ 7% O:60, Appendix B, PS 2SO:<20 % (RM) or sl0 % (AS)
60, Appendix B, PS 2NOxs20 %(RM) or <10 % (AS)14.2lb/hr
tl0 % (RM) or t5 % (AS)100 ppmvd @ 7% O:60, Appendix B, PS 44CO
60, Appendix B, PS 8A
Incineralor
System
THC <20 % (RM) or sl0 % (AS)l0 ppmvd @ 7olo O:
AST-202.1-t517 Clean Harbors - Arngonite, UT Page 2-3
I
Source CEMS Required Relative
Accuracv
Applicablc St ndcrd /
Limit Citation
pln6rre
TECIiNICAL GFOUP Stte Spectlic Test Plan
festug Methodolopr'
3.0 TestingMethodolos/
This section provides a description of the sampling and analytical procedures for each test method that will be
employed during the test program. All equipment, procedures and quality assurance meeEures necessary for the
completion ofthe test program meet or exceed the specifications ofeach relevant test method. The emission testing
program will be conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3- 1.
Table 3-l: Sourcc -Iesting Methodolos/
All stack diameters, depths, widths. upstream and downstream disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be
measured on site with an EPA Method I verification measurement provided by the Field Team Leader. These
measurements will be included in the test repon.
3.1 U.S. EPA Refercnce Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/TraveNe Poitrts and Volumetric Flow Rrtc
The sampling location and number of faverse (sampling) points will be selecled in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances will be equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure l-2 in U,S, EPA Reference Test Method
l.
Full velocity traverses will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system will consist ofa pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature will be measured with a K-
type thermocouple and pyrometer.
The relative accuracy ofthe CERMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Performance
Specification 6.
3.2 U.S. EPA Referelce Test Method 3,{ - Oxygetr/Carbotr Dioxide
The oxygen (O:) and carbon dioxide (CO:) testing will be conducted in accordanc€ with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3A. Data will be collected online and r€ported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist
ofa stainless steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. Ifan unheated
Tellon sample line is used, then a ponable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly afler the
Full velocitv Trave6esVolumetric Flow Rate l&2
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Instrumental Analvsis
Moisture Content .l Gravimetric Analvsis
lnstrumenlal AnalysisSulfur Dioxide 6C
Nitrogen Oxides ,7E Instrumental Analvsis
t0 lnstrumental AnalysisCarbon Monoxide
Total Hvdrocarbons 25A
Cas Dilution Svstem Certification 205
AST-201.r-t5l?Clean HarboB - Aragonite. UT Page 3'l
Parameter tl.S. EPA Refercoce
Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Instrumental Analvsis
Alt6rre
TEC N CAL GROUP Site Specilic Test Plan
Testina Methodolos,
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section
3.9.
The relative accuracy of the O: and CO: CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60,
Appendix B, Performance Sp€cification 3.
33 U.S. EPA Refererce Test Method 4 - Moisture Cortert
The stack gas moisture content will be determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test lUethod 4. The gas
conditioning train will consist ofa series ofchilled impingers. Prior to testing. each impinger will be filled with a
known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger will be analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run
on the same analytical balance to determine the amount ofmoisture condensed.
3.4 U.S. EPA Ref€relce Test M€thod 6C - Sulfur Dioxide
The sulfur dioxide (SO?) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 6C. Data
will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist ofa heated stainless
steel probe, Teflon sample line(s). gas conditioning system and the identified analyzer. The gas conditioning system
will b€ a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the source gas. lfan unheated Teflon sample line is
used, then a ponable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a
heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.9.
The relative accuracy of the SO: CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B,
Performance Specifi cation 2.
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides
The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 78. Data
will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist ofa stainless steel
probe, Teflon sample line(s). gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system
will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. lfan unheated Teflon sample line is
used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a
heated Teflon sample linewill be used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.9.
The relatiye accuracy ofthe NOx CEMS will be determined bas€d on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B,
Performance Specifi cation 2.
3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l0 - Carbon Monoxide
The carbon monoxide (CO) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10.
Data will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist ofa stainless
steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system, and the idcntified gas analyzer. Th€ gas conditioning
system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the gas. lfan unheated Teflon sample line is
used, then a ponable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a
heated Teflon sample linewill be used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.9.
The relative accuracy of the CO CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B,
Performance Specifi cation 4/4A.
AST-2024-1517 Clean Harbors Aragonite. UT Page 3-?
put6rre
'r E ,'\N AL GROUP Sne SpectJic Test Plon
f!!!!!s a"t@4oto{y
3,1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Mcthod 25A - Total Hydrocarbors
The total hydrocarbons (THC) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A.
Dala will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist ofa stainless steel
probe, heated Teflon sample line(s) and the identified gas analyzer. The quality control measures are described in
Section 3.10.
The relative accuracy ofthe THC CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Performance
Specification 8A.
3.8 U,S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Cas Dilutioo System Ceraificstion
A calibration gas dilution system field check will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method
205. An initial three (i) poinr calibration will be conducted, using individual Protocol I gases. on the analyzer used
to complete the dilution system field check. Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates will be utilized to force
the dilution system to perform two dilutions on each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases will be sent
directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer response
must agree within 2olo ofthe actual diluted gas concentration. A second Protocol I calibration gas, with a cylinder
concentration within l0% of one of the gas divider settings described above, will be introduced directly to the
analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the
analyzer response must agree within 27o. These steps will be repeated three (3) times.
3.9 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Refercnce Test Methods 3A, 6C, 7E and I0
Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol I l+l- 2o/ol standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates
will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix ofthe report.
Low Level gas will be introduced directly to the analyzer. Afler adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will be recorded. This process will be
repeated for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration gases will be
sequentially introducad directly to the analyzer. The Calibration Error for each gas must be within 2.0 percent ofthe
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/7o absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to.cach 95 percent or 0.5 ppm/% (whichever was less restrictive) ofthe gas
concentration will be recorded. The analyzer reading will be observed unlil it rcaches a stable value, and this value
will be recorded. Next, Low-Level gas will be introduced ar the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading
to decrease to avalue within 5.0 perc€nt or 0.5 ppm/% (whichever was less restrictive) will be recorded. lfthe Low-
Levef gas is zero gas. the acceptable response must be 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration ot 0.5 ppmlo/"
(whichever was less restrictive). The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value, and this value
will be recorded. The measurement system response time and initial system bias will be determined from these data.
The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0 percent ofthe Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever is closerto the stack gas concentration) will be introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response is stable, the value will be recorded. Next, Low-Level gas will be introduced at thc probe. and the
analyzer value will be recorded once it reaches a stable response. The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0
percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/yo absolute difference or the dara is invalidated, and the Calibration
Enor Test and System Bias must be repeated.
AST-2011-t5t7 Clean Harbors Aragonrte. UT Page 3-l
A/t6rre
TECIINICAL GFOUP Sile SIPc$c Test Plan
Testug Methodologr
The Drift between pre- and post-run Syst€m Bias must be within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/%
absolute difference or the Calibration Enor Test and System Bias musl be repeated,
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check will be conducted prior to initiating testing.
The pollutant concenrations will be measured at twelve traverce points (as described in Method l) or three points
(16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent ofthe m€asurement line). Each traverse point will be sampled for a minimum of twice
the system response time.
Ifthe pollutant concentration at each traverse point do not differ more than 5o/o or 0.5 ppnll,3o/o (whichever is less
restriclive) ofthe average pollutant concentration. then single point sampling will be conducted during the test runs.
Ifthe pollutant concentration does not mea these specifications but differs less than loyo or 1.0 ppm/0.5% from the
average concentration, then three (3) point sampling will be conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - 16.7,
50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.E feet in diamerer 0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters
from the stack wall). If the pollutant concenfiation differs by more than l0% or 1.0 ppmlo.so/o from the average
concentration, then sampling will be conducted at a minimum oftwelve ( l2) traverse poins, Copies ofstralification
check data will be included in the Quality AsurancdQuality Control Appendix ofthe repon.
An NO: - NO converter check will be performed on the analyzer prior to initiating tesling or at the completion of
testing. An approximately 50 ppm nitrogen dioxide cylinder gas will be introduced directly lo the NOx analyzer and
the instrument response will be recorded in an electronic data sheet. The instrumenl response must be within +/- l0
percent of the cylinder concenration.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup will be used to record the instrument response in one ( I ) minute
averages. The data will be continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive ofa computer. At
the completion oftesting, the data will also be saved to the Alliance server. All data will be reviewed by the Field
Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once aniving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data will be
relinquished to the repon coordinator and then a final review will be performed by the Project Manager.
Within two(2) hours prior to testing, zero gas will be introduced through th€ sampling system to lhe analyzer. After
adjusting the analyzer to the Zero gas concentration and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will
be recorded. This process will be repeated for the High-Level gas, and the time required for the analyzer reading to
reach 95 percent of the gas conc€ntation will be recorded to determine the response time. Next, Low and Mid-
Level gases will be introduced through the sampling system to the analyzer, and the response will be recorded when
it is stable. All values must be less than +/- 5 percent ofthe calibration gas concentrations.
Mid-Level gas will be introduced through the sampling system. After the analyzer response is stable, the value will
be recorded. Nexr, Zero gas will be introduced through the sampling system, and the analyzer value recorded once
it reaches a stable response. The Analyz€r Drift must b€ less than +/- 3 percent ofthe span value.
AST-2021-1517 Clean Harbors - Aragonite. tJT Page 3-4
3.10 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 254
Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol | \+l- 20 l standards. Copies ofall calibration gas certificates
will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix ofthe report.
tAI
TECIINICAL GBOUP Site Sryctjc Test Plan
Testing MethodoloR|
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup will be used to record the instrument response in one ( I ) minute
averages. The data will be continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive ofa computer. At
the completion oftesting, the data will also be saved to the Alliance server. All data will be reviewed by the Field
Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data will be
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review will be performed by the Project Manager.
AST-:0:4-t5 t7 Clean Harbors Aragonrte. UT Pase l-5
FAI
Site Speclic Test Plan
QwhN Assurance Propran
,t.0 Quality Assursnce Program
Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Management Plan to ensure the
continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test progam. The QC checks and
procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme.
Adherence to prescribed procedures is quite often the most applicable QC check.
4.1 Equipmetrt
Field test equipment is assigned a unique, permanent identification number. Prior to mobilizing for the test
program, equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipment problems prior to arriving on site. This
minimizes lost time on the job site due to equipment failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is
unavoidable despite the most rigorous inspection and maintenance procadures. Therefore, replacemcnts for critical
equipment or components are brought to the job site. Equipment retuming from the field is inspected before it is
retumed to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and
recal ibrated where necessary.
Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. The
calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume Ill (EPA-600/R-94/038c, September 1994) are utilized.
When these methods arc inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recognized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked
for completeness and accuracy. Copies ofcalibration forms are included in the report.
The following sections elaborate on the calibIation procedures followed by Alliance for these items ofequipment
Drv Gas Meter and Orifice. A full meter calibration using critical orifices as the calibration standard is
conducted at least semi-annually. more fiequently ifrequired. The meter calibration procedure determines
the mete. conection factor (Y) and the meter's orifice pressure differential (AH@). Alliance uses approved
Altemative Method 009 as a post-test calibration check to ensure that the correction factor has not changed
more than 57o since the last full meter calibration. This check is performed after each test series.
Pitot Tubes and Manometers. Type-S pitot tubes that meel the geometric criteria required by U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.84 unless a specific coefficient has been
determined from a wind tunnel calibration. lfaspecific coefficient from awindtunnel calibration has been
obtained that coefficient will be used in lieu of0.84. Standard pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria
required by U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coe{Iicient of0.99. Any pitot tubes not
meeting the appropriate geometric criteria are discarded and replaced. Manometers are verified to be level
and zeroed prior to each test run and do not require funher calibration.
Temrrerature Measuring. Devices. All thermocou ple sensors mounted in Dry Gas Meter Consoles are
calibrated semi-annually wirh a NlsT-traceable thermocouple calibrator (temperature simulator) and
verified during field use using a second NlsT-traceable meter. NlsT-traceable thermocouple calibrators
are calibrated annually by an ouside laboratory.
Nozzles. Nozzles are measured three (3) times prior to initiating sampling with a caliper. The maximum
difference b€tween any two (2) dimensions is 0.004 in.
Disital Calipers. Calipers are calibrated annually by Alliance by using gage blocks that are calibrated
annually by an outside laboratory.
AST-:0:4-r517 Clean Harbors - Aragonile. UT I)aAc + I
L
TECHNICAL GFOUP
FiAlhlpeTECHNICAL GRO Stte Speclic test PlanP
Barometer. The barometric pressure is obtained fiom a nationally recognized agency or a calibrated
barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field trip against a mercury barometer. The
barometer is acceptable if the values agree within + 2 percent absolute. Barometers not meeting this
requirement are adjusted or taken out ofservice.
Balances Weishts Balances are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory. A functional check is
conducted on the balance each day it is use in the field using a calibration weight. Weights are re-certified
every two (2) years by an outside laborarory or intemally. If conducted intemally, they are weighed on a
NIST traceable balance. Ifthe weight does not meet the expected criteria, they are replaced.
Other Eqgipment. A mass flow controller calibration is conducted on each Environics system anlually
following the procedures in the Manufacturer's Op€ration manual. A methane/ethane penetration factor
check is conducted on the total hydrocarbon analyzers equipped with non-methane cutlers every six (6)
months following the procedures in 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ. Other equipment such as probes, umbilical
lines, cold boxes, etc, are routinely maintained and inspected to ensure that they are in good working order.
They are repaired or replaced as needed.
4.2 Field Sampling
Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test
method(s). General QC measures for the test program include:
. Cleaned glassware and sample train components will be sealed until assembly.
. Sample trains will be leak checked before and after each test run.
. Appropriate probe, filter and impinger temperatures will be maintained.
. The sampling pon will be sealed to prcvent air from leaking from the port.
. Dry gas meter, AP, AH, temperature and pump vacuum data will be recorded during each sample point.
. An isokinetic sampling tue of 90-1 l0% will be maintained, as applicable.
. All raw data will be maintained in organized manner.
. All raw dara will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability.
ASl-202.1-15t7 Clean Harbors - Amgon(e. UT Pagc,l-l
Appendix A
L
Al6rrce Method l Data
L
Dt.d. rrm F.r r+.rr h Our'& 0a *rd:
Nird. t irh: 7to r
D.plt'01D8.:
cor sd.n r AFrd[rrs: re6r fr,
I,i,eilrdoird.6:
^dud
rir{,., oa Tr-rd toitu:
n ,ba olntqn roi,b d . ti.^d4
.P{! t.,1dit&MDt t.a r&e
A
B
a
a
a
a
aaao aaaa
a
a
a
a
rdrin(.l.[xrrtoB^n$ii.
i-Etr
Appendix B
AI ]CTIEE}SO2 Summary
TECHN iCAL GROUP
Locrtion:
Sourcc:
Projecl No.:
Rur l)arc
-l imc
Reference Melhod
SO2 Conrentration
ppmvd
CEMS
SO2 CotrteDtration
ppmvd
Avcmge
Difference
ppmvdSlarr!:nd
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
t0
ll
l2
Skndard Devranon (Sd)
Apphcable Source Standard (AS)
Conlldence Coeillcient {CC)
Rclalile Acruracy (RA)
Perlormance Rcqurred - Mean Rel-erence Method RA ! 20%
Performance Sp€cifi cation Method PS:
Conlidencc Coclfi ci.trt CC
cc=ltn3'rsallvn I
t,or #fl/A = degrees ol liecdom value
n 0 = numbcr ofruns selecled lbrcalculating the RA
Sd _= standard devranon oI d itTerence
CC = conlidence coellicienr
Relstire lccurr.y, R{
ldl+lCClRA = ;3;;;;xloo
d_= average dilTerence of Reference Method and CEMS
CC _= confi dence coeflcient
RM _= reference method, ppmvd
RA = relative acauracy. o/o
F
SO2 Summary
TECHNiCAL GROUP
Localion:
Source:
Project No.:
Rur I)arr
l imr Rrfcrrrc€ ]lelhod
SO2 ( on(€ntration
ppmrd,al7 7o ()2
CTMS
SO2 Concentrrtion
ppmrd (A 7 '/o 02
Difference
ppm\d 'a 1 "/o 02Startt.nd
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
lt
t2
Shndard Devialron (Sd)
Applicable Source Standard (AS)
Conlid.nce Coefllcrent (CC )
Rehtire Accure.t (R{)
Perlbrmance Requtrlrd - Mean Rellrence Melhod RA S 20%
Performance Specilicatron Method PS2
Conlidencr Coclficienl ( C
.. = l'n:'r rollVn I
!,,:i #N/A = de$ees of lreedom value
n 0 = number olruns selected for calculating the RA
Sd_= s6ndard devianon of ditTerence
CC = confidence coefllcienl
Relrtile,\ccuiac!". RA
ldl+lrclRA = ;3;;Tr x loo
d = averase dit)erence of Reltrence Method and CEMS
CC _= confidence coellicient
RM _= reference method, ppmvd @ 7 7o 02
RA........................._= relative acaJ'r?ay, o/o
anlErrce NOx Summary
TECHNLCAL GROUP
Locrtior:
Soorc€:
Project \o.:
Ruo
D:rtc
'I imc Referene Ilelhod
NOx Concentrrtion
ppmvd
CEMS
NOx Concentr$tion
ppmvd
Averrge
Difference
ppmvdllnd
I
2
l
J
5
'I
8
9
t0
II
t2
Slandard Deviation (Sd)
Apphcable Source Standard (AS)
Conlidence Coeftc jenr (CC )
Relatite Accuracy (RA)
Performance Rcqurred - Mean Relerence Method RA < 20%
Perlbrmance Specifi calion Method PS?
( onfidrnft ( o0mci€nl. ('C
cc ltor' r ,olI ./n I
#N/A
sd
CC
= degrees oifre.dom value
= number ofruns selected for calculating the RA
= standard devianon of diI}lrence
= conlidence coellicient
R.lrtive Accur.cy, RA
* = **#",00
d_= average difference of Reference Method and CEMS
CC _= contidence coeulcient
RM _= reference method. ppmvd
RA _ = relative accuracy. o%
Srart
pltt6rlr=NOx Summarv
TECHNiCAL GROUP
l.orArion:
I imcRunI) lr
St!rt lnd
Reference llethod
r_Or llmission Ratr
lb/hr
Cf,MS
NOr Emisrion Rrte
lb/hr
Arerage
Difference
lb/hr
I
3
4
5
6
7
t
9
t0
t2
Standard Devianon (Sd)
Applrcable Source Standard (AS)
Confi dence Coellicrent (CC)
Relslir e ..\ccu rrct (RA)
Perlbrmance Requrred - Mean Reference Mefiod RA I 20olo
Performance Specrfi canon l\lerhod PS:
I
*=lY'*l
Rehlive Accuracy, RA
ld l+ lCClRA = ---.-\ 100
( onfidrnrc ( oemcient. ( (
h *s ___.fl! = degees of ti&dom value
n 0 = number of runs selected for calculaaing the RA
Sd_= siandard deviation of difference
CC = confidence coeflicient
d _ = avemge d ifl;rence of Reference N4ethod and C E tt4 S
CC
-=
confidence co€llicrent
RM _= reference melhod. lb/hr
RA_= relatrve accuracy. 70
AI l TIEE}CO Summary
TECHNICAL GROUP
Localion:
s{)urcei
Proiecl \o.:
Coafidence Coeficient C('
cc=l'og'rsal| '/n I
!),5 #N/A = degees of freedom value
= numberofruns selected forcalculating the RA
= standard deviatron ofdifference
= confidence coemc ient
n
Sd
CC
0
Relelive Accurrcy, RA
ldl+lcrl
Rrq = -----j-----:----i x 100
Allernrtive Relative Accurrcy, RA
Rr{ = ldl +cC
d-= average difference of Rel_erence Method and CEMS
CC = confidence c.Eflicrenl
RM
-=
ret'ermce meliod. ppmvd
RA_= relatir e accumc). 70
d-= averag€ differcnce of Reference Method 6nd CEMS
CC
-=
conl'idence coe flicr'nt
RA - = relative accurac). ppm
.1 im(Run l)xtt
Start Ind
Referencc \lcrhod
( O Conctntrnlion
CE}IS
CO Conccntration
ppmvd
Averrge
DifTer€nc€
ppmvd
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
t0
t2
Srandard Devrarion (Sd)
Applicable Source Slandard (AS)
Confi denct Coeflicient (CC )
Relati\e lccurrcl (R.{)
Perlbrmance Requrred - Mean Reference Method RA : I 00/o
Pcrlbrmance Specification Mclhod
I
A CO Summary
TECHN'CAL GROUP
Locrtion:
Source:
Proj€ct \o.:
Run I)atc
I inrr RefereIce Method
CO (loncentretion
ppmrdaa-r7%02
CEMS
( O Concenlrrtio[
pprard@7n/oo2
Averrge
Diff€r€nce
Dpmvd@1'/.OzSlarlEod
I
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
t2
Slandard Devrauon (Sd)
Applicablc Source Standard (AS)
Confi dence Coeffi cient (CC )
Rclstive Accurac!" (RA)
Perlbrmance Requircd - Mean Reference N4ethod RA S I 0olo
Performance Specifi catro. Method PS.IA
Corfidctrcc CocfrlcLtrl, CC
.. = lt"gt r rollvn I
vhcrc.
h rr ---]$- = degees of fl€edom value
n _____:q_= number of runs sel€cted for calculating the RA
Sd_= sBndard deviation of difference
CC = confidence coemcient
Relative Accurrcr-. RA
d l+ ICC I
RrA = ------:......:.....r^ t00
Altemrtiv€ R.Liive Accur.cy, R{
RA = ldl +CC
d_= averaBe difference of Reference Method and CEMS
CC _= conlidence coelfi cient
RM_= reference method, ppmvd @ 7 7.02
RA....,....'................-= relahve aacwacy, Yo
d-= average dillerence of Reference Melhod and CEMS
CC
-=
conlidence coeilicient
RA - = relalrve accuracy. ppm
THC Summary
TECHNJCAL GROUP
Localionr
Sourc€:
Pmjcct \o.:
Run l)arc
I ime
Rrfcrcnft lIe(hod
TII( (rs( 3118) (loncentrr(ion
ppmvd
cf,Its
THC (3s C3H8) Codcetrtrrtion
ppmvd
Averrge
Difference
ppmvdStan[]nd
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
Sundard Deviatrcn (Sd)
Applicable Source SBndard (AS)
Conlidence Coellicient (CC)
Relstive Accuracy (RA)
Perlbrmance Required - Mean Reference Method RA S 20%
Pedbrmancc Spcc(ication Method PS8
Colllidescc Coellicicnl CC
aa = It"I" rollvn I
!,rrr dN/A
sd
CC
= degrees of freedom value
= number ofruns selecled for calcularing the RA
= standard deviation of difference
= confi dence coeflicient
0
d _ = average difference of Reference Method and CEM S
CC _= confi dence coeffi cient
RM _= reference method, ppmvd
RA = relative accuracy, %
Rehtire Accureq. R{
ldl+lccl
RA = As or RM xloo
A/tErtre THC Summary
TECHNiCAL GROUP
Locrlioni
Source:
Project \o.:
I imcRunDare
Slarl End
Reference lllethod
TH(: (3s C.lH8) Concentrrlion
ppmyd (i 7 '/o 02
Cf,TIS
'l'HC (as C3HE) ('oncentrstion
ppnlvd ta) 7 o/. 02
Diff€rcrc€
ppm\d.d 7 n/o 02
I
2
l
4
5
6
1
8
9
t0
t2
Slandard Devralion (Sd)
Applicable Source Standard (AS)
Confidence Coelncrent (CC)
Relstirr lccurrcy (R.t)
RA ! 200/0Performance Required - Mean Relbrence M€thod
Performance Sp€crfi carron Method PS8
I
( o.fid.n.e ( o.lficienL a(-
CC l-;".'l
r,r ,5 -__..:q4_ = degrees of freedom value
n 0 = numtq ofruns selected lbrcalculaling the RA
Sd = skndard deviation ofdifference
cc
-
= confi dence coeffi cienr
R.htivc Accurrcy. R{
ldl+lCCltuq = -----:--j----r x 100
d-= aveBge difTerence of Reference Method and CEMS
CC _= con,idence coemcienl
RM_= ret'erence melhod, ppmvd @ 7 % 02
RA _ = relative accuracy, 7o
P;1-Alhlrce 02 Summary
TECHNiCAL OFIOUP
Locstion:
Sourcc:
Project \o.:
Run l)at
'Iime Reference Mathod
()2 Concentr.tion
'/n drr
CEMS
02 Concentrrtion
o/. dry
A\eragc
Diflerence
o/. dr\Strrt End
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
Slandard Deviatron (Sd)
Confidence Coemcienl (CC)
Relrtil e Ac(urac!" ( R,\)
Per!ormancc Requrred - Mean Relerencr Method RA S 2070
Perfo.mance Specillcalron Mcthod PS .]
( onfidence ( ocfficirnl. ( ('
CC I ,r''l
to us -__..1[!_ = degrees of freedom value
n 0 = numberofruns selected for calculating the RA
Sd_= standard deviation of differmce
CC = confidence coefficienl
d_= average differcnce of Reference Method and CEMS
CC_= confidence coeflcienl
RM _= reference rnethod, % dry
RA - = relalive accuracy, %
Relrtive Accur.cy, RA
,dl+lrrl
FLq = -----:----j-----: x 100
FA!talEe CO2 Summary
TECHNICAL GROUP
I-ocrlioo:
Sourcr:
Projecl \o.:
Run Dat{
R€ferenc€ Method
CO2 Concentrution
Cf,MS
CO2 CoDccntration
o/. dry
Av€mge
DllIerence
o/. dryStrrrUnd
I
2
3
1
5
6
7
8
l0
t2
Smndard DeYialion (Sd)
Conlidence Coeffi cient (CC )
Relalite Accurecy (RA)
Perfbrmance Requrred - Mean Reference Method RA:20%
Peribrmance Sp.cifi cation Melhod PS .]
Confid€nc€ (-oeflicienl. CC
CC h;r'*l
t{, ,5 -jU4_ = degrees of freedom value
n 0 = number ofruns select€d for calculatrng fie RA
Sd_= standard deviatron of difTerence
CC = confidence .oeflicienl
Relativc lcc0ract_. R{
ld l+ lcclRA = :-----:------:-- x100AS or RM
d
-
= average d iflerence of Reference Melhod and CEM S
CC _= confi dence coemcient
RM_= reference method. % dry
RA - = relative accumcy, o/o
l imo
AI VFR Summary
TECHN CAL GROUP
I.ocrtion:
Source:
Proje.l \o.:
Confidenc. Co€fn ieot, CC
aa=ltn='rrollvn I
6rr. #N/A = degrees offreedom value
n 0 = number of runs selectod for crlculating the RA
Sd-= standard deviation of diffefence
CC = confidence coeflicient
Rclrtire Accurscy, RA
ldl+lccl
Rrq =
-xt00
d _ = avemge diference of Reference Method and CEMS
CC _= confidence coefficient
RM - = reference merhod. scfm{ry
RA = relative accumcy, To
I im€Run I)arr
Strrl tnd
R(ferrnce llethod
l low Rate
arfm-dry
CEMS
Flow R.rte
rcfmdrt
Arerage
Difference
,cfm-dn_
I
2
.l
5
6
7
8
9
l0
lt
t2
Slandard Devialion (Sd)
Conl'idence Coeffi cienr (CC)
R€lrtire Accurecy (R{)
120'/oAcceptabilrty Criteria - Mean Relerence Method
PS6Performance Sp€crlicatrcn Method
-
AI ralEe
TECIIN ICAL GROUP
Run I Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date: -
Time
Unit
o2
o/o dn
CO:
o/o d,ry
SO,
ppmvd
NOr
ppmvd
CO
ppmvd
THC
Dpmvw
Status Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid
Parameter
fJncorrected Run Average (Cob,)
Cal Gas Concentration (Crua)
Pretest System Zero R€sponse
Posttest System Zero Response
Average Zero Respolse (Co)
Pretest System Cal Respo[se
Posftest Syslem Cal Rcsponse
Average Cal Response (CM)
Corrected Run Average (Corr)
Pollutant
SO2 NOx CO THC
NA
Dilucnt02 co2
AlErce QA Data
TECHNiCAL C ROUP
L,ocation:
Sou rce:
Project No.:
Paranreter o1 CO,SO,NOr CO THC
lU.ke
Uodel
s/\
Orrerating Rrnge
( r linder \umber ll)
LO\\NA \A NA NA
) D
IIICII
Cylinder Certified Values
LOW NA NA NA NA NA
MID
IIICH
Cylinder Vendor lD (PCVPID)
LOW NA NA NA NA NA
fu Il)
HICH
Cylindcr Expiration Date
LO\\'NA NA \A NA NA
) D
I (;ll
Cylinder EPA Gas Tyoe Code
ZERO zuRo ZER()Zt]RO NA NA
! D NA NA
NA NAIIICII
--I-II
IE-EI
E-E---EI--
EE
--III-
EIEI--
I-EE-EII--
-E-E-
---I
l.ow
[----- --------
Altarrce Response Time Data
Locttiorl:
Source:
Proje(t No.:
l'arametcr or ('o,so,\o\('o t ('
Zero
l,ow
Mid
Hish
NA NA \A NA NA
,\\'erage
seconds
AI tatEE!Calibration Data
TECH\ICAL GROUP
l,oc{tion:
Source:
Projecl l\o.:
Drle:
ol CO:so.('o I (
ll\Derted.\1 errse ( oncentretion
Sprtr Should b. b.twaenr
High
D.sir.d Spro
l,ow Rrtrg. G.s Should be betrveen
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid R.Bg. G.s Should bc b.tw..D
lrw
Hish
High Rrnge Ges Shoold bc bctween
l-olr
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Acturl Cotrccrtr.tioD (o/o or ppm)
Zkao
[rw
Mid
Hisb
0.00
NA
0.00 0.00 0.00
NA
0.00
Rrsponse l-ime (seconds)
I pscele (]rlibr:ltion C{s ((l\l^)Mid 14id rl id t\'1id Mid Mid
Inslrument Response (o/o or ppm)
Zaro
Lolr
Mid
llish
NA NA NA
Performrtrce (9/. ofSpro or Calibrrlioo Crsll,to II.o* I
Mid I
Hieh I
NA .;^NA NA NA
00
l,iolxriry (o/o ofSpen or Crl. Grs Conc,)
Stn t u\
Zero
l-o*..
!tid
lliEh
NA NA NA
PASS
0.00
i1
NA NA
A/t6rre Runs 1-3 Bias/Drift Determinations
TEOIINI(;AL GROUP
Lm.tion:
Sourca:
Proj.ct \o.:
Drt :
or (o:so.\or (o l(
Run I
Span Value
lnitial lnslrument Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Respons€
Final Instrumen! Zero Cal Response
Final Instrument Upscale Cal Response
helest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Mid Response
Posttest System Mid Response
Bias or Sy$em Performance (% )
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
NA
NA
NA
Drifl (%)
Zerc
Mid
Run l
Span Value
Inilial lnstrument Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrumenl Upscale Cal Response
Final Instrumenl Zero Cal Response
Final Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest Syslem Zero Response
Pretest System Mid Response
Posrest System M id ResDonse
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posnest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
NA
NA
NA
NA
Drili (%)
Zero
Mid
Run 3
Span Value
lnitial Ihstrument Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument upscale Cal Response
Final Instrument Zem Cal Response
Final Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Pomest Syslem Zero Response
PreEst Syslem Mid Respons€
Posttest Sy$em Mid Response
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posltest Span
NA
Drili (%)
Zero
Mid
AI rarEe Cyclonic Flow CheckTECiIN ICAL CIBO{,JP
Locrtion --
Source --
Project No. -
Date
S.mple Point Angle (AP=0)
I
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
t0
ll
t2
t3
l4
t5
l6
Avcrrgc
EI
-.
{m o I z:r a,oc t
R
[.
J
DT
!9
i
,1
1;
;
:

1:
;

i
9
t:
eE
a
s
a
E
;

::

il
z
:

:
:
ii
i
t
+
1
i

ii
s
s

;i
:
i
i
l
i
.
-
i
:t
s
a
:
:
:
:

::
;
;
;
t
;
:
:
:
;
:
;
i
E
.
1+
F
i
i
i
i
f

?F
i

1l

1i
;
i

i!

ii
i
r
il
i
t

ii

i:

i:

i
ii
r

i
ii
l

i
i
$;
;
s$
I
i
1
1

ir

i€
;
"
i
i
t

!i
;

?"
=
I

:-
"
i-
-
-

-
-
-i
E
it

t
!
t
!
!
3
i
-;
;

!
E;

i
-r

!
r
E
E:

a
s,
s
:g
it
t
i;
i
i
t
i
a I ,
1a
,
2a
1a
i
F
TE(lHN'CAL GBOI.JP
Method 2 Data
:
l
.
.
llltfureTECIINICAL GROUP NOx Converter Efficiency Check
l,ocation:
Sour(e:
Project No.:
Converter ( heck
Anslyzer Ilrke
Amlyzer !lodel
Anelyzer Serirl \unber
Cylinder lD #
Cylinder Exp. D.te
Pre-Test Date _ Time
Prr-T€st (lonccntrrtion, ppm
'lest
Post-Tesr Drte
Post-Terr ( onc iiation. p-pm
Time
(oncentrati Posl-Tesl Efficir
'Efrcienq'nust be z 90 %
AI ralEE!EPA Method 205
Field Calibration of Dilution System
TECHNICAL GROUP
s/N
Cylinder Cenili.d vrlu.s
ln*rum.nI R.slotr* l%or oDml
Crlibrrdon 6ri S.lcdion ("/. of SprnJ
crlibmtioD f rror P..formrDr. (% of sDmr
'Not.ll AST Enu@rcs U ls havr 2-l0L M6s no$ Conrllle6 Forlhce urrs the 90% rt, TlpD dl0o/ 9lpm rn cdions srll not bc cordu@d
Anairzr Male
Analrzr Mod.l
Anal)z.. SN
Env,6i.sID:
Conpo4n/Balae Cs
Crlrnder Ga lD (D,luoor)
Cvl'n&r Gd Con*nEaton (D'lution)- 0,,6
cl.l'Dder c6 ID {Mid-L.vct)
Cllinder C6 Co.enloton (Mid-t !el). '/q
m
AI TA]EC)
TECHNICAL GROLP
l-ocation -
Source -
Pmj
Prremeter(s): -
Drlr Pitot ID f,vidcnce of
danage?
Evidence of
mis-alisnmrnt?
(-rlibrrtion or
Repair required?
Dalr Probe lt)Rc[rrencc
'Iemp. (ot)
lndicrted
Temp. (oF)l)iff€rence ( ritcrilt
+ 1.5 % (absolute)
field Baleoce Check
l)arc
Balance lD:
Tes( Weight ID:
Certified weight (g):
Measured Weighl (g)
Weight Differenc! (g):
Datc Baromrtric tlridenc. of
drmrge?
Rrading
Yerified
( rlibretioD or
Reprir required?Brromcter ID
Datc Positi\e Prcssurc l.crk ('ht(k
0 Pass
II
II
II
I
I
QA Data
)lrtcr Bor ll)
AI F-l TlEE
TECI-I\ICAL GROUP
Locrtiotr: 0
QA Data
Stratification Check
Source:0
Project No.:0
Datc:
Traverse Point Time NOr
(DDm)
CO
(DDm)
Sor
(DDm )
o2
("/"\
CO,
("/.1
2
3
4
5
6
I
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
l]-I
2
,t
5
6
Average
Status Single Point Sinp.le Point Single Point Sinslc Point SinAle Point
AI tarGE)
TTCIIN ICAL GROUP
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run/Method: Run I - Method 3A
Oxygen Concentration (Cor), 7o
where,
Cco,
where,
co,(cor"-co),(#Y.i)
C.o,_: average analyzer value during test. 7o vd
Co _ : auerage of pretest & posttest zero responses. 7o vd
C"o_- actual concentration of calibration gas. %vd
C" _: arerage of pretest & posttest calibration responses, 7o vd
Cor = 02 concentration. Yo vd
Carbon Dioxide Concentration (Ccol), o%
= (cous _.J,.(#y.J)
Cor" _: average analyzer value during test. 70 vd
Co_: arerage of pretest & posttest zero .esponses. 70 vd
Cr^_= actual concentration of calibration gas,7o vd
C, _= arerage of pretest & posttest calibration responses. 7o vd
Cco, = CO2 concentration- 7o vd
Appendix A
Example Calculations
AI TAlEC!Appendix A
Example Calculations
TECH\ICAL GROUP
Run/Method: Run I - Method 6C
Locatioo:
Source:
Project No.:
Lso2 -
where.
where,
Sulfur Dioxide Concentratior (Cso!), ppmvd
Cou,_: average analyzer value during test. ppmvd
Co_= auerage of pretest & posnest zero responses. ppmvd
Cn ^_= actual concentration of calibmtion gas. ppmrd
C, _: uuerage of pretest & posttest calibration responses. ppmvd
Cso, : SO1 concentration. ppmvd
Sulfur Dioxide Concentration @ 7yo Oxygetr (Cso2"?), ppmvd (@ 7o/o 02
(cou.-co),(#Yai)
20.9 - 7
Csozcz =Csozx2y-g_6o,
C.o, _= SO2 concentration, ppmvd
Cn, _= Ol concenlration, 70
Cso:"r - ppmvd @ 7o/o O,
F Appendix A
Example Calculations
Tf CIIN ICAL GROUP
Locatiotr:
Source:
Project No.:
Run/llethod: Run I - \lcthod 71,
Nitrogen Oxides Concentration (C\o,), ppmvd
LNox -
where,
C.*
cM
Cxo,
Nitrogen Oxid€s Emission Rate (ER\o,), lb/hr
ERNo, = Cr.rox rQs x 60 | CF
where,
Cro'
CF
Qs
ERxo^
(cor. - co), (#YEj)
= average analyzer value during test. ppmvd
c"_= average of pretest & posttcst rero responses. ppmvd
Cvo = actual concentration ofcalibration gas. ppmvd
= average ofpretest & posttesl calibration responses, ppmvd
= NOx concentration, ppmvd
= Nox concentration, ppmvd
= NOx (as NO2) ConveBion Factor, Ib/dscf
= stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm
= lb/hr
A/t6tre Appendix A
Example Calculations
TECH\ICAL GROUP
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Carbon Monoxide Corcentratior (C(.o), ppmvd
Cco
where,
where,
(cou" - co),. (#y.,)
Cnt,-=
c. _:
Clra
-=
c"
-:
Cco
average analyzer value during test. ppmvd
average ofpretest & posttest zero responses. ppmvd
actual concentration of calibration gas. ppmvd
average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CO concentration. ppmvd
Carbon Monoxide ConcentratioD @ 77o Oxyger (Cco.?), ppmvd @ 7o/o 02
20.9 - 7
LcocT - LCo ^ ZO.9_Co,
C.o_: CO concentration, ppmvd
Co, _= 02 concentration- 7o
Cco", : ppmvd lQ 7o/o O2
Rur/Method: Run I - Method l0
AI Appendix A
Example Calculations
TECH\ICAL GROI.JP
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run/Method: Run I - Method 2iA
Total Hydrocsrbotrs CoDc€trtratiotr (CrHcd), ppmvd
^ Ctuc*
LrHcd = I_BWS
rvherc,
Crrc*_: THC concentration. ppmvw (as ClHs)
BWS_= moisture fraction. unitless
cruca
-=
PPmud
Total Hydrocarbons Concentration @ 7Yo Orygen (C -, (. c.\, ppmvd @ 7o/o 02
20.9 - 7
Crnocrz = CrnocxidijTi
where,
Cr*_: THC concenration. ppmvd (as C1H6)
Co, _ = Ot concentration. 7o
Croc"r _ = ppmvd, (@ 7o/o 02
AI F::ralEC)Appendix A
Example Calculations
TECHNICAL GROU P
lrcrtio! -
Pro.i€ct \o. -
Run \o. I
Pm
AHPb+-13.6
pu+*
1-J.t)
Meler Pressure (Pm), in. Hg
Pb________:_ barometrrc pr€ssue. in. Hg
Pg - - nanc prEssure. rn H:O
Ps - =in H8
BWS =(Vwstd + Vmstd)
Pb - = baromelric pressure, in. Hg
AH - = prcssur€ driTcrcnlial ofonfic!, in H:O
Pm - =rn H8
Absolute Stick Gos Pressure (Ps), in. Hfl
Ps
lm
Y 0.000 = mctcr conEction fector
Vm - = mci€rvolumc. cf
Pm - = absolutc n€lcr prcssue, in. Hg
Tm - = absolule m€ter tcmp€rBture, h.
Vmstd - - dscf
Str rrd $d volume (\'$std). scf
Vwsld = 0 04706 ri Vlc
Slandrrd Mcl.r volum. (vmstd), dscf
lT616xVmrPnt\Y
Vlc - volunre ol H:O collecled ml
Vwsrd -. = sci'
Nloist re Frrctio. (BwS)r dimettlionl.ss
Vwstd
\toiilu.e Fr.ctior (BWSsat), dim€nsiorl€lrs (lh.orcticrl at satureted condilions)
BWSsat
- ^- t 2.82? \
10o r /-\Ts+36s-/
P.
Ts - = stacl l€mp.rature. 'F
Ps - = absolule stacl( 8a5 prcssur., in Hg
BWSsal - - din€nsionless
Ywsrd - - srandard qd volume, scf
Vn)srd - nandard meler lolume, dscf
BWS - = drmens'oDlcss
*:."Alhrrce
TECHNICAL GROUP
l,ocadon -
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Run \o. I
= moislur. fractoo (lheorctical al satuml.d condilrons)
= moislurc fraclion (mcnsured)
\Iole(ular \\eighl (DR\') (lrdI lb/lb-bolr
y4 = (0.4a x o/o COz) + (0.32 x o/o OZ) + (0.28 (L00 - o/o CO2 - o/o OZ))
CO2 - : c{.bon dioxide con enuation. 7.
O2-_= oxyg€n conccntratior\ '/oMd - = lMb mol
llole(ular $ eishl (\ r]T) (\t5), lb/lb-mole
Ms = Md (1 - BwS) + 18.01s (BWs)
}1oistore lrrclion (BwS), dimensionlels
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat < BWSmsd
Averrge ! clocir!_ (\'s), frsec
BWssat
BWSmid
BWS
Md
BWS
Ms
= molccular veighl (DRY),lb/lb mol
= moislure ftacrion, dimensionl€ss
= lb/lb mol
Vs = 85.49 x Cp x (A p 1/2) avg x
Cp - - pitoi lub€ coctfcienl
a p'".T= u"erag€ prc/posr resr velo.ity h.ed of $acl 8,as, (in. H2o)r/l
Ts - = avemg€ prc/posi rcst absolule slacl l.mp€ralur€, 'R
Ps - = absolurc stack 8as prEssurE, in. H8
Ms - : molccular rverghr ofslack gas, Ibnb mol
Vs - = fi/scc
Aver.$ StrckC.s Flold rt St ckConditions (Q.),.cftrr
Qa = 60x Vs x As
vs - = srack sar velocuy, ft/s€c
a. - = *oo's€clion are3 ofsracl, ff:
Oa - = acfn
Avcrrg. Strcl Cs. Flow rt Strodtrd Colditiors (Q.I dscfn
Qsd = 17636xQax(l -Bws)x t
Cra - = average eack gfr t'low al sla.li condrlaons. acfin
BwS - ' moislur. fmclion. dinEnsionless
Ps - = absolul€ slack 8es prcssure, in H8
Ts - = avcragc prc/posl tesl absolule slack l.nrptGllre. 'R
as - = dscfm
Ts
Pr-M.
anl6rrce Appendix A
Example Calculations
Run \o. I
Dn (;s\ Urter Crlibralion ( hcck (\ qa), dimenrionlc\r
Y_/s
[*aaor(.u *@rr--lrua
0.0319xTmx29 fiH avg.
Yqa =x 100
Y
Y 0 = melercorrection faclor. dimEnsionl.ss
O 0 = run time, rnin
vm - = roral m€ter volu6., dcf
Tm - = absolut€ mel€r l€mp€ratur€, 'R
AH@ 0 = onfic€ mel€r crlibmlron coefficieni, rn H:O
Pb - = barometric pnssure.,n. Hg
AH avg - - average pressur€ dif€rcntial ofonfice, in H:o
Md - - molecularweighl (DRY),lMb mol
{a u)L'r +veLuel = av€rag€ squareroor pressure ditr rentiai oforifice. (in. Hro)rn
Yqa - = p.rcem