DAQ-2025-002492

1

DAQC-449-25
Site ID 10722 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – CARGILL INCORPORATED – Salt Division – Salt Lake
County

THROUGH: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Oil and Gas Section Manager

FROM: Kyle Greenberg, Environmental Scientist

DATE: May 13, 2025

SUBJECT: Source: Carmon System Cyclone Exhaust
Contact: Carmen Ontiveros: 661 586-1240
Location: 15100 West Rowley Road, Grantsville, UT 84029
Test Contractor: TETCO
Permit/AO#: DAQE-AN107220016-16 dated March 23, 2016
Action Code: TR
Subject: Review of Stack Test Report dated December 9, 2022

On January 3, 2023, the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a test report for the Carmon
System Cyclone Exhaust at Cargill Inc. Salt Division in Salt Lake County, Utah. Testing was performed
on November 22, 2022, to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits found in condition II.B.2.f of
Approval Order DAQE-AN107220016-16. The DAQ-calculated test results are:

Source Test Date Test Methods Pollutants Tester Results DAQ Results Limits
Carmon
System
Cyclone
Exhaust
November
22, 2022 M201A/202 PM10 0.81 lb/hr 0.8456 lb/hr 2.65 lb/hr

DEVIATIONS: None.

CONCLUSION: The stack test appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Carmon System Cyclone Exhaust be considered
as in compliance with its PM10 emission limits, during the time of
testing.

HPV: None.

ATTACHMENTS: Cargill Inc. Stack Test Report, DAQ excel worksheets
4 ' - ) - "
Cargill Inc.
Salt Division
Four Carmen Industries Cyclones
Test Date: 11/22/2022
Methods 201A/202 - PM10/PM2.5/CPM Emissions
Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 Average
date 11/22/2022 11/22/2022 11/22/2022
start time 9:27 AM 11:14 AM 12:56 PM
stop time 10:28 AM 12:15 PM 1:57 PM
sample volume (ft3)26.286 26.980 26.855 26.707
sampling time (minutes) 58.75 59.75 60.00 59.50
stack temp. (oF)124.8 126.4 128 126
meter temp. (oF)57.2 66.5 71.3 65
barometric pressure (mbar) 879 879 879 879
barometric pressure (" Hg) 25.95 25.95 25.95 25.95
stack pressure (" H2O)-0.45 -0.45 -0.45 -0.45
moisture (grams) 26.1 28.3 24.1 26.2
oxygen (%) 20.8 20.6 20.6 20.7
carbon dioxide (%) 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6nitrogen (%)78.6 78.8 78.8 78.7
orifice pressure delta H (" H2O)0.52 0.51 0.51 0.51
average √∆P 0.8811 0.8802 0.8837 0.882
meter box Yd 0.994 0.994 0.994 0.994
delta H@ 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.72
pitot tube constant 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78
nozzle diameter (inches) 0.172 0.171 0.172 0.171stack diameter (inches) 47.5 47.5 47.5 47.50
Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 Average
cyclone catch mass, PM10+ (g) 0.00240 0.00230 0.00200 0.00223 0.00000
PM10 mass, cyclone rinse (g) 0.00370 0.00180 0.00460 0.00337 0.00000
PM10 mass, filter (g) 0.00300 0.00240 0.00000 0.00180 0.00000
inorganic condensable mass (g) 0.00410 0.00510 0.00460 0.00460 0.00000
organic condensable mass (g) 0.00105 0.00085 0.00085 0.00092 0.00000
Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 Average
sample volume (dscf) 23.167 23.358 23.040 23.189
moisture volume (scf) 1.231 1.334 1.136 1.234
absolute stack press. (" Hg) 25.92 25.92 25.92 25.92
moisture content (%/100) 0.050 0.054 0.047 0.050
molecular weight (dry) 28.93 28.92 28.92 28.92molecular weight (actual) 28.38 28.33 28.41 28.37
gas velocity (ft/sec) 52.3 52.4 52.6 52.4
gas flow (acfm) 38,628 38,678 38,832 38,713
gas flow (dscfm) 28,675 28,546 28,795 28,672
% isokinetic 105.4 105.7 102.3 104.5
nozzle area (ft2)1.604E-04 1.595E-04 1.604E-04 1.601E-04
Nozzle Velocity (ft/sec) 55.2 55.4 53.8 54.8
R_min 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
V_min 39.4 39.6 38.3 39.1
R_max 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
V_max 69.3 69.6 67.7 68.9
Min Velocity Head (Delta P_min) 0.44 0.44 0.41 0.43
Max Velocity Head (Delta P_max) 1.36 1.37 1.29 1.34
Gas Viscosity (micropoise) 190.5 190.5 191.4 190.8
Dry std Cyclone Flow Rate (ft3/min)0.39 0.39 0.38 0.39
Actual Cyclone Flow Rate (ft3/min)0.53 0.53 0.52 0.53
Actual PM10 Cyclone Cut size (μm) 9.7 9.7 9.9 9.7
Reynold's Number (unitless) 3,029 3,009 2,928 2,988
Cunningham correction factor (unitless) 1.085 1.085 1.085 1.085
Actual PM2.5 Cyclone Cut size (μm) 2.05 2.07 2.13 2.08
Re-estimated Cunningham correction factor (unitless) 1.076 1.077 1.077 1.077
Re-calculated PM2.5 Cyclone Cut size (μm) 2.06 2.07 2.14 2.09
Z Ratio (0.99<Z<1.01) 1.004 1.004 1.004 1.004
Emission Limits
Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 Average
PM10+ emissions (lb/hr) 0.3930 0.3719 0.3307 0.3652
PM10+ emissions (gr/dscf) 0.0016 0.0015 0.0013 0.0015
PM10+ emissions (lb/MMBtu) 0.4158 0.1317 0.1161 0.2212
Total PM10 emissions (lb/hr) 1.0971 0.6791 0.7606 0.8456 2.65
Total PM10 emissions (gr/dscf) 0.0079 0.0067 0.0067 0.0071
Total PM10 emissions (lb/MMBtu) 2.0528 0.5813 0.5835 1.0725
inorganic CPM emissions (lb/hr) 0.6714 0.8246 0.7606 0.7522
inorganic CPM emissions (gr/dscf) 0.0027 0.0034 0.0031 0.0031
inorganic CPM emisssions (lb/MMBtu) 0.7102 0.2921 0.2671 0.4231
organic CPM emissions (lb/hr) 0.1719 0.1374 0.1405 0.1500
organic CPM emissions (gr/dscf) 0.0007 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006
organic CPM emissions (lb/MMBtu) 0.1819 0.0487 0.0494 0.0933
Total PM emissions (lb/hr) 1.4901 1.0509 1.0913 1.2108
Total PM emissions (gr/dscf) 0.0095 0.0082 0.0081 0.0086
Total PM emissions (lb/MMBtu) 2.4685 0.7130 0.6997 1.2937
Vn (ft/sec) 49.35145294 49.7207569 49.68085711
Qs 0.47501406 0.475782238 0.478184618
Gas Stream Viscosity (micropoise 201A) 194.4447583 194.399267 195.3945062
D50LL 10.19789546 10.18953421 10.19065508 New D50LL
D50T 10.59894773 10.59476711 10.59532754
D50 (Cyclone Cut) 10.59846116 10.59428021 10.5948406
Cunningham correction factor 1.018380284 1.018423597 1.018517086
Reference Method Calculations
Laboratory Data
Field Reference Method Data
Particulate Emissions Calculations

PM10 COMPLIANCE TEST
CONDUCTED AT
CARGILL INCORPORATED, SALT DIVISION,
GRANTSVILLE, UTAH

CARMEN SYSTEM EXHAUST

November 22, 2022

by:

TETCO
391 East 620 South
American Fork, UT 84003

Prepared for:

Cargill Salt
PO Box 648
Grantsville, UT 84029

Date of Report:

December 9, 2022

iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE
Introduction
Test Purpose .........................................................................................................................1
Test Location and Type of Process ......................................................................................1
Test Dates.............................................................................................................................1
Pollutants Tested ................................................................................................................. 1
Test Participants .................................................................................................................. 1
Methods Applied ..................................................................................................................1
Principle of EPA Method 201A ...........................................................................................2
Discussion of Errors or Irregularities ...................................................................................2
Quality Assurance ................................................................................................................2

Summary of Results
Emission Results ..................................................................................................................3
Process Data .........................................................................................................................3
Allowable Emissions ...........................................................................................................3
Description of Collected Samples ........................................................................................3
Cyclone Cut-Rate and Isokinetics ........................................................................................3

Source Operation
Process Control Devices Operation .....................................................................................5
Process Representativeness ..................................................................................................5

Sampling and Analytical Procedures
Sampling Port Location .......................................................................................................6
Sampling Point Location......................................................................................................6
Sampling Train Description .................................................................................................6
Sampling and Analytical Procedures ...................................................................................7
Quality Assurance ................................................................................................................7

Appendices
A: Complete Results and Sample Calculations
B: Raw Field Data
C: Laboratory Data and Chain of Custody
D: Facility Schematic Representation
E: Calibration Procedures and Results
F: Related Correspondence

iv
LIST OF TABLES

PAGE
Table
I Measured PM10 Emissions .......................................................................................3
II Cyclone Cut Rate and Isokinetics ............................................................................4
III Sampling Point Location..........................................................................................6
IV Complete Results Carmen System Exhaust ........................................... Appendix A

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure
1 Facility Schematic Representation Carmen System Exhaust ............................ Appendix D
2 Schematic of EPA Method 201A Sampling Train ............................................. Appendix E

INTRODUCTION

Test Purpose

This test was conducted to determine the PM10 emission levels from the Carmen Exhaust System.
Emissions are calculated in terms of gr/dscf and lb/hr. Testing was conducted to demonstrate
compliance with the emission limits in the facility approval order number DAQE-AN010722016-16.

Test Location and Type of Process

Cargill Incorporated, Salt Division’s Grantsville plant is located one half mile west of Rowley
Junction (Exit77) on Interstate 80 in Tooele County, Utah. The facility produces salt and salt
products. Testing was conducted on the Carmen System Exhaust prior to exiting to the atmosphere.

A stack schematic representation is shown as Figure 1 in Appendix D.

Test Dates

Three test runs were completed on November 22, 2022.

Pollutants Tested

The tests were a gravimetric determination of PM10 particulate according to EPA Method 201A and
202 found in 40 CFR 51, Appendix M. Method 202 is not for compliance but for information only.

Test Participants

Cargill Incorporated Jackson Nash Carmen Ontiveros

State None

TETCO Reed Kitchen Mike McNamara

Methods Applied
EPA Methods 201A and 202 were used for all tests.

2
Principal of EPA Method 201A

A gas sample is extracted at a constant flow rate through an in-stack sizing device, which separates
particulate matter (PM) greater than PM10 from particulate matter less than PM10. Variations from
sampling conditions are maintained within well-defined limits. The particulate mass is determined
gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water.

A schematic of the sampling train is given as Figure 2 in Appendix E.

Discussion of Errors or Irregularities

None.

Quality Assurance

Testing Procedures and sample recovery techniques were according to those outlined in the Federal
Register and the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems.

3
SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Emission Results

Table I presents the PM10 test results. Table IV in Appendix A has more complete test data results.

TABLE I Measured PM10 Emissions
Run # gr/dscf lb/hr
1 0.0045 1.09
2 0.0028 0.67
3 0.0028 0.69
AVG. 0.0033 0.81

Process Data

The process was operated according to standard procedures. All pertinent process data including
cyclone pressure drop readings were recorded by Cargill personnel and are found in Appendix D.

Allowable Emissions

The allowable PM10 emissions for the Carmen System Exhaust are 0.040 gr/dscf and 2.65 lb/hr.

Description of Collected Samples

The PM10 filters had a small amount of white particulate on them. The front washes were clear
in color.

Cyclone Cut-Rate and Isokinetics

The Federal Register specifies that tests for PM10 using EPA Method 201A shall either not
exceed ±1µ of 10µ and the measured flow rates (P's) shall not exceed the calculated P
maximum or P minimum, or one P may exceed the P maximum or minimum if the
isokinetics remain within ±20% of 100%.

4
The cyclone cut rates, isokinetics, and number of P's which exceeded the allowable range are
shown in Table II.

Table II. Cyclone Cut Rate and Isokinetics

Run #

Cyclone Cut Rate
()

Percent
Isokinetic

# pts< P min or
>P max
1 9.77 107 0
2 9.79 107 0
3 9.98 103 0

5
SOURCE OPERATION

Process Control Devices Operation

All control devices operated normally.

Process Representativeness

The facility operated normally during the tests. Cargill personnel recorded the pertinent
production and process data. This information is found in Appendix D.

6
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

Sampling Port Location

The Carmen Exhaust System stack inside diameter is 47.5 inches. The ports are 1.95 diameters
(92.5 in) upstream from the nearest disturbance and 2.19 diameters (104 in) downstream from
the nearest stack disturbance. Two, 6 inch diameter test ports were available for testing.

Sampling Point Location

Table III shows the distance of each sampling point from the inside wall according to EPA
Method 1. Each point is marked and identified with a glass tape wrapping and numbered. These
points are determined by measuring the distance from the inside wall and adding the reference
(port) measurement.

TABLE III Sampling Point Location

Sample
Point

Distance (inches) from
inside wall
1 2.09
2 6.94
3 14.06
4 33.44
5 40.57
6 45.41

Sampling Train Description

To determine the actual emission rates for these stacks, 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, Methods 201A
and 202 were followed.

The sampling train was made of inert materials, (i.e., Teflon, stainless steel, glass, etc.) to
prevent sampled gas and particulate interference. The stack analyzer used to conduct Method
201A is constructed to meet the specifications outlined in the CFR. The temperature sensors are
K-type thermocouples. Heater, vacuum and pitot line connections are designed to be
interchangeable with all units used by the tester. The probe liners were constructed to meet the
specific test method specifications.

7
Sample boxes were prepared for testing by following the prescribed procedure outlined in the
specific method employed.

Sampling and Analytical Procedures

All test and analytical procedures employed were as specified in 40 CFR Part 51.

Quality Assurance

All equipment set-up, sampling procedures, sample recovery and equipment calibrations were
carried out according to the procedures specified in 40 CFR 51 and the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems.

8
APPENDICES

A: Complete Results and Sample Calculations
B: Raw Field Data C: Laboratory Data and Chain of Custody
D: Facility Schematic Representation
E: Calibration Procedures and Results F: Related Correspondence

A
APPENDIX A

Table IV Complete Results, Carmen System Exhaust Nomenclature
Sample Equations

Complete Results
Symbol Description Dimensions Run #1 Run #2 Run #3
Date Date 11/22/2022 11/22/2022 11/22/2022
Filter #427 428 429
Begin Time Test Began 9:27 11:14 12:56
End Time Test Ended 10:28 12:15 13:57
Pbm Meter Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.95 25.95 25.95
DH Orifice Pressure Drop In. H2O 0.520 0.510 0.510
Y Meter Calibration Y Factor dimensionless 0.994 0.994 0.994
Vm Volume Gas Sampled--Meter Conditions cf 26.286 26.980 26.855TmAvg Meter Temperature oF 57.2 66.5 71.3
Ahead Ave. Area Blocked by Sample Train in2 17.00 17.00 17.00
As Stack Cross Sectional Area in2 1772.1 1772.1 1772.1
bf Probe Blockage Factor for PM2.5 0.0096 0.0096 0.0096
√Dps2 Sq Root Velocity Pressure Corrected for bf Root In. H2O 0.8811 0.8802 0.8837
DPmeasured Sq Root Velocity Head ( as measured)Root In. H2O 0.8726 0.8718 0.8752
DP Sq Root Velocity Head (adj. for blockage if necessary)Root In. H2O 0.8726 0.8718 0.8752
Wtwc Weight Water Collected Grams 26.1 28.3 24.1
Tt Duration of Test Minutes 58.75 59.75 60.00
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient Dimensionless 0.779 0.779 0.779
Dn Nozzle Diameter Inches 0.1715 0.1710 0.1715
CO2 Volume % Carbon Dioxide Percent 0.60 0.60 0.60
O2 Volume % Oxygen Percent 20.80 20.60 20.60
N2 & CO Volume % Nitrogen and Carbon Monoxide Percent 78.60 78.80 78.80
Vmstd Volume Gas Sampled (Standard)dscf 23.169 23.360 23.041
Vw Volume Water Vapor scf 1.231 1.334 1.136
Bws Fraction H2O in Stack Gas Fraction 0.050 0.054 0.047
Xd Fraction of Dry Gas Fraction 0.950 0.946 0.953
Md Molecular Wt. Dry Gas lb/lbmol 28.93 28.92 28.92
Ms Molecular Wt. Stack Gas lb/lbmol 28.38 28.33 28.41
%I Percent Isokinetic Percent 106.5 106.8 103.4
u Gas stream Viscosity micropoise 193.8 193.7 194.8
QsST Dry Gas Sample Rate dscfm 0.394 0.391 0.384
QsCyc Sampling Rate 0.532 0.531 0.519
Nre Reynolds Number 2976.9 2958.8 2876.7
C Cunningham Correction Factor @ PM2.5 Dimensionless 1.078 1.078 1.078
D50 PM10 Cut Point microns 9.77 9.79 9.98
D50 PM2.5 Cut Point, Condition Built In microns 2.10 2.11 2.18
Cr Re-estimated Cunningham Correction Factor Dimensionless 1.092 1.092 1.090
D50-1 PM2.5 Cut Point, Condition Built In microns 2.09 2.10 2.17
Z Ratio of D50 / D50-1 (0.99 ≤ Z ≤ 1.01)Dimensionless 0.993 0.993 0.995
AVG
Ts Avg Stack Temperature oF 124.8 126.4 128.0 126.4
As Stack Cross Sectional Area Sq. Ft.12.306 12.306 12.306
PG Stack Static Pressure In. H2O -0.450 -0.450 -0.450
Pbp Sample Port Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.92 25.92 25.92
Ps Stack Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.887 25.887 25.887
Qs Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Std) Measured dscfm 2.84E+04 2.82E+04 2.85E+04 2.84E+04
Qa Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual) Measured cfm 3.83E+04 3.83E+04 3.85E+04 3.84E+04
Vs Velocity of Stack Gas Measured fpm 3.11E+03 3.11E+03 3.13E+03 3.12E+03
MPM10.0 Mass of PM10.0 Particulate milligrams 6.7 4.2 4.2
M>PM10.0 Mass of >PM10.0 Particulate milligrams 2.4 2.3 2.0
Mcpm Mass of Condensibles milligrams 4.3 5.1 4.6
CPM10.0 Concentration of PM10.0 Particulate gr / dscf 0.0045 0.0028 0.0028 0.0033
C>PM10.0 Concentration of >PM10.0 Particulate gr / dscf 0.0016 0.0015 0.0013 0.0015
Ccpm Concentration of Condensibles gr / dscf 0.0029 0.0034 0.0031 0.0031
ERPM10.0 Emission Rate of PM10.0 Particulate lb / hr 1.086 0.672 0.687 0.8148
ER>PM10.0 Emission Rate of >PM10.0 Particulate lb / hr 0.389 0.368 0.327 0.3613
ERcpm Emission Rate of Condensibles lb / hr 0.697 0.816 0.752 0.7549
TABLE IV
COMPLETE RESULTS
PM10 PARTICULATE MATTER
CARMEN SYSTEM EXHAUST
%I =percent isokinetic
As =stack cross-sectional area (ft3)
ASDP =see DP
Btu =unit heat value (British thermal unit)
Bws =fraction of water in stack gas
Ccpm =concentration of condensibles (grain/dscf)
Ccors =concentration of coarse particulate (gr/dscf)
CO2 =percent carbon dioxide in the stack gas
Cp =pitot tube coefficient (0.84)
CPM10 =concentration of PM10 particulate (gr/dscf)
Deq =equivalent stack diameter (inches)
DH =orifice pressure drop (inches H2O)
DH@ =orifice pressure (inches H2O)
DHd =orifice pressure head (inches H2O) needed for cyclone flow rate
Dn =nozzle diameter (inches)
DP =stack flow pressure differential (inches H2O)
Dp50 =50% effective cutoff diameter of particle (m)
Ds =diameter of the stack (feet)
EA =percent excess air
Ercpm =emission rate of condensibles (lb/hr)
Ercors =emission rate of coarse particulate (lb/hr)
ERmmBtu =emission rate per mmBtu or ton of fuel etc.
ERPM10 =emission rate of PM10 particulate (lb/hr)
ERX =emission rate of compound which replaces x
L =length of rectangular stack (inches)
mBtu =thousand Btu
Mcond =mass of condensibles (milligrams)
Mcors =mass of coarse particulate (milligrams)
Md =molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis (lb/lb-mol)
mmBtu =million Btu
MPM10 =mass of PM10 particulate (milligrams)
Ms =molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis (lb/lb-mol)
ms =gas viscosity (micropoise)
Mwgas =molecular weight of gas species (lb/lb-mol)
N2 =percent nitrogen in the stack gas
O2 =percent oxygen in the stack gas
DP =average of the square roots of DP (may also be referred to as ASDP)
DP1 =square root of DP at point 1 of the current test, Method 201A
DP1'=square root of DP at point 1 of the previous traverse, Method 201A
DP'ave =average of the square roots of DP from the previous traverse, Method 201A
Pbm =absolute barometric pressure at the dry gas meter (inches Hg)
Pbp =absolute barometric pressure at the sample location (inches Hg)
PG =stack static pressure (inches H2O)
Ps =absolute stack pressure (inches Hg)
Pstd =absolute pressure at standard conditions (29.92 inches Hg.)
pts =number of traverse points during the test (minimum of 6, maximum of 12)q =time of test (minutes)
Method 201A / 202 Nomenclature
Method 201A / 202 Nomenclature
q1 =sample time (duration in minutes) at first sample point for Method 201A
qn =sample time (duration in minutes) at sample point "n" for Method 201A
Qa =stack gas volumetric flow rate (acfm)
Qs =stack gas volumetric flow rate (dscfm)
Qsc =actual gas flow rate through the cyclone (acfm)
Qsc' =predicted actual gas flow rate through the cyclone (acfm)
Qw =wet stack gas std. volumetric flow (ft3/min, wscfm)
Rmax =multiplier for Vn
Rmin =multiplier for Vn
Tm =meter temperature (oF)
Ts =stack temperature (oF)
Tstd =absolute temperature at standard conditions (528oR)
Tt =see q
Vm =sample volume (ft3) at meter conditions
Vmstd =volume standard (dscf), sample volume adjusted to 68oF and 29.92 inches Hg.
Vmax =maximum allowed nozzle velocity (fps)
Vmin =minimum allowed nozzle velocity (fps)
Vn =target nozzle velocity (fps)
Vs =velocity of stack gas (fpm)
Vw =volume water vapor (scf) at 68oF and 29.92 inches Hg.
W =width of rectangular stack (inches)
Wtwc =weight of the condensed water collected (grams)
Xd =fraction of dry gas
Y =meter calibration Y-factor (dimensionless)
%I =Vmstd • (Ts + 460) • 1039 / (q • Vs • Ps • Xd • Dn2)
As =(Ds2 / 4) • p
Bws =Vw / (Vmstd +Vw)
Ccpm =Mcpm • 0.01543 / Vmstd
Ccors =Mcors • 0.01543 / Vmstd
CPM10 =MPM10 • 0.01543 / Vmstd
Deq =2 • L • W / (L + W)
DHd =[Qsc' • Xd • Ps / (Ts + 460)]2 • [(Tm + 460) • Md • 1.083 • DH@ / Pbm]
Dp50 =0.15625 • [(Ts + 460) / (Ms • Ps)]0.2091 • (ms / Qsc)0.7091
Dpmax =1.3686 • 10-4 • Ps • Ms • Vmax2 / [(Ts + 460) • Cp2]
Dpmin =1.3686 • 10-4 • Ps • Ms • Vmin2 / [(Ts + 460) • Cp2]
EA =(%O2 - 0.5 %CO) / [0.264 %N2 - (%O2 - 0.5 %CO)]
Ercpm =Ccpm • Qs • 0.00857
Ercors =Ccors • Qs • 0.00857
ERmmBtu =ER / (mmBtu / hr)
ERPM10 =CPM10 • Qs • 0.00857
Md =CO2 • 0.44 + O2 • 0.32 + N2 •0.28
Ms =(Md • Xd) + (18 • Bws)
ms =[51.05 + 0.207 • (Ts + 460) + 3.24 •10-5 • (Ts + 460)2 + 0.53147 • %O2 - 74.143 • Bws] • 10-6
Ps =Pbp + (PG / 13.6)
q1 =(DP1' / DP'ave) • (qtest / pts)
Qa =Vs • As
qn =q1 • DPn / DP1
Qs =Qa • Xd • Ps • Tstd / [(Ts + 460) • Pstd]
Qsc =[(Ts + 460) • Pstd / (Tstd • Ps)] • [(Vmstd + Vw) / q]
Qsc' =ms • 0.002837 • [(Ts +460) / (Ms • Ps)]0.2949
Qw =Qs / Xd
Rmax =0.4457 + [0.5690 + (0.2603 • Qsc' • ms / Vn1.5)]
Rmin =0.2457 + [0.3072 - (0.2603 • Qsc' • ms / Vn1.5)]
Vmax =Vn • Rmax
Vmin =Vn • Rmin
Vmstd =Vm • Y • Tstd • (Pbm + DH / 13.6) / [Pstd • (Tm + 460)]
Vn =3.056 • Qsc' / Dn2
Vs =85.49 • 60 • Cp • DP •  [(Ts + 460) / (Ps • Ms)]
Vw =Wtwc • 0.04715
Xd =1 - Bws
Method 201A / 202 Sample Equations

B
APPENDIX B

Carmen System Exhaust
Preliminary Velocity Traverse and Sampling Point Location Data
Particulate Field Data

C
APPENDIX C

Carmen System Exhaust
Sample Recovery
Method 201A Lab Analysis Method 202 Lab Analysis
Gas Analysis Data (ORSAT)
Chain of Custody
Facility:Date:
Stack Identification:Run:1
Filter Number:427 Sample Box:A
Blanks &Acetone Blank Correction 0.00000 g/100ml Rinse Vol.Filter & PM10 30 ml
Rinses > PM10 30 ml
CRITERIA
Filter Final1:0.1174 g FinalAVG:0.1174 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:8:00 Process Weight Time
Final2:0.1173 g Preweight:0.1144 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:14:00 Final Pass Pass
Net 0.0030 g
Net 3.0 mg
PM10 Wash Final1:46.1405 g FinalAVG:46.1404 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:8:00
Final2:46.1402 g InitialAVG:46.1367 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:14:00
Gross:0.0037 g Process Weight Time
Initial1:46.1366 g Blank:0.0000 g Date:8/17/2022 Time:9:00 Final Pass Pass
Initial2:46.1367 g Net 0.0037 g Date:8/18/2022 Time:9:00 Initial Pass Pass
Net 3.7 mg
Beaker Number:91
> PM10 Final1:60.6175 g FinalAVG:60.6176 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:8:00
Wash Final2:60.6176 g InitialAVG:60.6152 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:14:00
Gross:0.0024 g Process Weight Time
Initial1:60.6152 g Blank:0.0000 g Date:8/17/2022 Time:9:00 Final Pass Pass
Initial2:60.6151 g Net 0.0024 g Date:8/18/2022 Time:9:00 Initial Pass Pass
Net 2.4 mg
Beaker Number:86
RESULTS PM10 PM (Information Only)
Filter (M1)3.0 mg PM10 6.7 mg
PM10 Wash (M3)3.7 mg > PM10 2.4 mg
Total 6.7 mg Total 9.1 mg
Comments:Criteria: 1) Weights are ± 0.5 mg of each other, or within 1% of the net weight. 2) There shall be at least 6 hrs between weighings.
Lab Technician:Date:11/23/22
Lab Technician:Date:11/28/22
Cargill
Carmen Mill
11/22/2022
Mike McNamara
Dean Kitchen
Facility:Date:
Stack Identification:Run:2
Filter Number:428 Sample Box:B
Blanks &Acetone Blank Correction 0.00000 g/100ml Rinse Vol.Filter & PM10 40 ml
Rinses > PM10 45 ml
CRITERIA
Filter Final1:0.1186 g FinalAVG:0.1187 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:8:00 Process Weight Time
Final2:0.1187 g Preweight:0.1163 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:14:00 Final Pass Pass
Net 0.0024 g
Net 2.4 mg
PM10 Wash Final1:58.8760 g FinalAVG:58.8761 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:8:00
Final2:58.8761 g InitialAVG:58.8743 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:14:00
Gross:0.0018 g Process Weight Time
Initial1:58.8742 g Blank:0.0000 g Date:8/17/2022 Time:9:00 Final Pass Pass
Initial2:58.8744 g Net 0.0018 g Date:8/18/2022 Time:9:00 Initial Pass Pass
Net 1.8 mg
Beaker Number:87
> PM10 Final1:59.5453 g FinalAVG:59.5452 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:8:00
Wash Final2:59.5451 g InitialAVG:59.5429 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:14:00
Gross:0.0023 g Process Weight Time
Initial1:59.5427 g Blank:0.0000 g Date:8/17/2022 Time:9:00 Final Pass Pass
Initial2:59.5430 g Net 0.0023 g Date:8/18/2022 Time:9:00 Initial Pass Pass
Net 2.3 mg
Beaker Number:88
RESULTS PM10 PM (Information Only)
Filter (M1)2.4 mg PM10 4.2 mg
PM10 Wash (M3)1.8 mg > PM10 2.3 mg
Total 4.2 mg Total 6.5 mg
Comments:Criteria: 1) Weights are ± 0.5 mg of each other, or within 1% of the net weight. 2) There shall be at least 6 hrs between weighings.
Lab Technician:Mike McNamara Date:11/23/22
Lab Technician:Dean Kitchen Date:11/28/22
Cargill
Carmen Mill
11/22/2022
Facility:Date:
Stack Identification:Run:3
Filter Number:429 Sample Box:C
Blanks &Acetone Blank Correction 0.00000 g/100ml Rinse Vol.Filter & PM10 50 ml
Rinses > PM10 40 ml
CRITERIA
Filter Final1:0.1145 g FinalAVG:0.1145 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:8:00 Process Weight Time
Final2:0.1144 g Preweight:0.1149 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:14:00 Final Pass Pass
Net (0.0004)g
Net (0.4)mg
PM10 Wash Final1:57.5123 g FinalAVG:57.5122 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:8:00
Final2:57.5120 g InitialAVG:57.5076 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:14:00
Gross:0.0046 g Process Weight Time
Initial1:57.5074 g Blank:0.0000 g Date:8/17/2022 Time:9:00 Final Pass Pass
Initial2:57.5077 g Net 0.0046 g Date:8/18/2022 Time:9:00 Initial Pass Pass
Net 4.6 mg
Beaker Number:89
> PM10 Final1:47.9865 g FinalAVG:47.9864 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:8:00
Wash Final2:47.9862 g InitialAVG:47.9844 g Date:11/28/2022 Time:14:00
Gross:0.0020 g Process Weight Time
Initial1:47.9844 g Blank:0.0000 g Date:8/17/2022 Time:9:00 Final Pass Pass
Initial2:47.9843 g Net 0.0020 g Date:8/18/2022 Time:9:00 Initial Pass Pass
Net 2.0 mg
Beaker Number:90
RESULTS PM10 PM (Information Only)
Filter (M1)-0.4 mg PM10 4.2 mg
PM10 Wash (M3)4.6 mg > PM10 2.0 mg
Total 4.2 mg Total 6.2 mg
Comments:Criteria: 1) Weights are ± 0.5 mg of each other, or within 1% of the net weight. 2) There shall be at least 6 hrs between weighings.
Lab Technician:Mike McNamara Date:11/23/22
Lab Technician:Dean Kitchen Date:11/28/22
Cargill
Carmen Mill
11/22/2022
Facilty:
Stack Identification:Test Date(s):
Sample Description/ID #
Inorganic CPM
Beaker/Tin #342 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%343 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%344 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%
Final Weight (1), g 2.2084 12/8/22 8:00 < 1 2.2393 12/8/22 8:00 < 1 2.2384 12/8/22 8:00 < 1
Final Weight (2), g 2.2085 12/9/22 8:00 < 1 2.2392 12/9/22 8:00 < 1 2.2384 12/9/22 8:00 < 1
Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2085 2.2393 2.2384
Initial Weight (1), g 2.2042 9/13/21 9:00 < 1 2.2342 9/13/21 9:00 < 1 2.2338 9/13/21 9:00 < 1
Initial Weight (2), g 2.2045 9/14/21 9:00 < 1 2.2341 9/14/21 9:00 < 1 2.2338 9/14/21 9:00 < 1
Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2044 2.2342 2.2338
mr: Initial Inorganic Wt, mg 4.10 5.10 4.60
H2O added in Extractions, ml 60 pH pH 60 pH pH 60 pH pH
Reconstituted H2O Volume, ml Start End Start End Start End
N: Normality of NH4OH
Vt: Volume of NH4OH, ml
mc: Mass of NH4 Added, mg
mi (or mib): Final Inorganic Wt, mg 4.10 5.10 4.60
Organic CPM
Beaker/Tin #345 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%346 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%347 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%
Final Weight (1), g 2.2229 12/8/22 8:00 < 1 2.2234 12/8/22 8:00 < 1 2.2344 12/8/22 8:00 < 1
Final Weight (2), g 2.2229 12/9/22 8:00 < 1 2.2233 12/9/22 8:00 < 1 2.2341 12/9/22 8:00 < 1
Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2229 2.2234 2.2343
Initial Weight (1), g 2.2218 9/13/21 9:00 < 1 2.2224 9/13/21 9:00 < 1 2.2333 9/13/21 9:00 < 1
Initial Weight (2), g 2.2219 9/14/21 9:00 < 1 2.2226 9/14/21 9:00 < 1 2.2335 9/14/21 9:00 < 1
Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2219 2.2225 2.2334
mo (or mob): Net Organic Wt, mg 1.05 0.85 0.85
mcpm : Gross CPM, mg 5.2 5.9 5.5
mcpm : Blank CPM, mg 0.8 0.8 0.8
mcpm : Net CPM, mg 4.3 5.1 4.6
pH Meter: Oakton pHTestr BNC, Electrode Model: 35801-00
pH Date Time Lab Technician:Date:12/9/22
Fisher pH Buffer 4.00
Fisher pH Buffer 7.00 Lab Technician:Dean Kitchen Date:11/23/22
10/21/2015Form Date:
Method 202 Laboratory Form
Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
11/22/22
Cargill
Carmin Mill
Mike Mc Namara
Facilty:
Stack Identification:Test Date(s):11/22/22
Sample Description/ID #
Inorganic CPM
Beaker/tin #92 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%93 Date Time Rel. Hum %
Final Weight (1), g 48.6577 12/8/22 8:00 < 1 48.9449 12/8/22 8:00 < 1
Final Weight (2), g 48.6579 12/9/22 8:00 < 1 48.9449 12/9/22 8:00 < 1
Ave. Final Weight, g 48.6578 48.9449
Initial Weight (1), g 48.6574 8/17/22 9:00 < 1 48.9445 8/17/22 9:00 < 1
Initial Weight (2), g 48.6575 8/18/22 9:00 < 1 48.9446 8/18/22 9:00 < 1
Ave. Initial Weight, g 48.6575 48.9446
mr: Initial Inorganic Wt, mg 0.35 0.35
H2O added in Extractions, ml 60 pH pH 60 pH pH
Reconstituted H2O Volume, ml Start End Start End
N: Normality of NH4OH
Vt: Volume of NH4OH, ml
mc: Mass of NH4 Added, mg
mi (or mib): Final Inorganic Wt, mg 0.35 0.35
Organic CPM
Beaker/tin #94 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%95 Date Time Rel. Hum %
Final Weight (1), g 47.8340 12/8/22 8:00 < 1 48.1710 12/8/22 8:00 < 1
Final Weight (2), g 47.8339 12/9/22 8:00 < 1 48.1712 12/9/22 8:00 < 1
Ave. Final Weight, g 47.8340 48.1711
Initial Weight (1), g 47.8335 8/17/22 9:00 < 1 48.1701 8/17/22 9:00 < 1
Initial Weight (2), g 47.8334 8/18/22 9:00 < 1 48.1702 8/18/22 9:00 < 1
Ave. Initial Weight, g 47.8335 48.1702
mo (or mob): Net Organic Wt, mg 0.50 0.95
mcpm (or mfb): Total CPM, mg 0.8 1.3
pH Meter: Oakton pHTestr BNC, Electrode Model: 35801-00
pH Date Time Lab Tech.:Date:12/9/22
Fisher pH Buffer 4.00
Fisher pH Buffer 7.00 Lab Tech.:Date:11/23/22
10/21/2015Form Date:
Method 202 Laboratory Form
Recovery Blank Proof Blank
Cargill
Carmin Mill
Mike Mc Namara
Dean Kitchen
Facilty:
Stack Identification:Test Date(s):
Blank Description/ID #Water Acetone Hexane
Lot #11114A24 216539 MKCQ2365
Beaker/tin #51 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%52 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%53 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%
Final Weight (1), g 48.1034 12/8/22 8:00 < 1 58.6877 12/8/22 8:00 < 1 59.1685 12/8/22 8:00 < 1
Final Weight (2), g 48.1035 12/9/22 8:00 < 1 58.6877 12/9/22 8:00 < 1 59.1687 12/9/22 8:00 < 1
Ave. Final Weight, g 48.1035 58.6877 59.1686
Initial Weight (1), g 48.1034 8/17/22 9:00 < 1 58.6876 8/17/22 9:00 < 1 59.1688 8/17/22 9:00 < 1
Initial Weight (2), g 48.1036 8/18/22 9:00 < 1 58.6877 8/18/22 9:00 < 1 59.1685 8/18/22 9:00 < 1
Ave. Initial Weight, g 48.1035 58.6877 59.1687
Blank Residual Mass, mg 0.00 Water 0.05 Acetone 0.00 Hexane
Blank Mass, g 225 149 144
Blank Volume, ml 225 190 216
Max Blank Residulal Mass, mg 0.23 0.19 0.22
Lab Technician:Date:12/9/22
Lab Technician:Date:11/23/22
10/21/2015Form Date:
Method 202 Field Reagent Blank Form
11/22/2022
Cargill
Carmin Mill
Fisher ACS Sigma-AldrichRICCA Reagent
Mike Mc Namara
Dean Kitchen
Blank Description/ID #Water Acetone Hexane
Lot #2007C49 216539 MKCQ2365
Beaker/tin #330 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%331 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%332 Date Time
Rel. Hum
%
Final Weight (1), g 2.2339 12/5/22 8:00 < 1 2.2372 12/5/22 8:00 < 1 2.2431 12/5/22 8:00 < 1
Final Weight (2), g 2.2339 12/7/22 8:00 < 1 2.2368 12/7/22 8:00 < 1 2.2429 12/7/22 8:00 < 1
Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2339 2.2370 2.2430
Initial Weight (1), g 2.2337 9/13/21 9:00 < 1 2.2370 9/13/21 9:00 < 1 2.2430 9/13/21 9:00 < 1
Initial Weight (2), g 2.2338 9/14/21 9:00 < 1 2.2369 9/14/21 9:00 < 1 2.2430 9/14/21 9:00 < 1
Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2338 2.2370 2.2430
Blank Residual Mass, mg 0.15 Water 0.05 Acetone 0.00 Hexane
Blank Mass, g 220 226 170
Blank Volume, ml 220 288 255
Max Blank Residulal Mass, mg 0.22 0.29 0.25
Lab Technician:Date:11/18/22
Lab Technician:Date:12/7/22
10/21/2015
Method 202 Laboratory Reagent Blank Form
RICCA Reagent Fisher ACS Sigma-Aldrich
Form Date:
Mike Mc Namara
Dean Kitchen

D
APPENDIX D

Figure 1. Schematic of Facility, Carmen System Exhaust
Production and Process Data

Facility:
Stack Identification:

Cyclone
2Number of Ports
Process
Type:
Control Unit
Type:Salt Cooler Dryer
5Estimated Moisture, percent
140Estimated Temperature, oF
3,100Estimated Velocity, fpm
104"b: Distance downstream from last disturbance, feet
35'g: Distance of Sample Level to ground, feet
47.5 Stack Inside Diameter, inches
Cargill Incorporated
Carmen System Exhaust
a: Distance upstream from next disturbance, feet 92.5"a
g
b
Figure 1. Facility Schematic Representation, Carmen System

E
APPENDIX E

Calibration of the console dry gas meter(s), pitot tubes, nozzles diameters, and temperature sensors were carried out in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance
Handbook. The appropriate calibration data are presented in the following pages. The nozzle
calibrations are recorded on the first page of the field data sheets.

Figure 2. Schematic of EPA Method 201A Sampling Train
Meter Box Calibration Data and Calculations Forms Meter Box Post Test Calibration Sheet
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration Filter Balance Calibration
Figure 2. Schematic of Method 201A/202 Sampling Train
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.
TECHNICIAN:INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)
DATE:12/28/21 METER SERIAL #:28152 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg):25.10 25.10 25.10 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,
METER PART #:Console 9 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #:1453S EQUIPMENT ID #:ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
K'TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED
FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3)AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN)DGM DH (1)(2)(3)Y
ORIFICE #RUN #(AVG)(in Hg)INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG q (in H2O)Vm (STD)Vcr (STD)Y VARIATION (%)DH@
1 0.8137 13 11.682 17.031 5.349 73 76 79 69 69 73.3 5.00 2.95 4.4823 4.4246 0.987 1.776
2 0.8137 13 17.031 22.375 5.344 73 74 78 70 70 73.0 5.00 2.95 4.4802 4.4246 0.988 1.777
3 0.8137 13 22.375 27.732 5.357 73 77 78 70 71 74.0 5.00 2.95 4.4827 4.4246 0.987 1.773
AVG = 0.987 -0.68
1 0.5317 13 92.175 97.189 5.014 72 68 71 68 68 68.8 7.25 1.25 4.2165 4.1961 0.995 1.765
2 0.5317 13 97.189 104.640 7.451 72 69 74 68 68 69.8 10.75 1.25 6.2540 6.2219 0.995 1.762
3 0.5317 13 104.640 109.810 5.170 72 72 75 68 69 71.0 7.50 1.25 4.3292 4.3408 1.003 1.758
AVG = 0.998 0.36
1 0.3307 13 27.933 33.009 5.076 73 75 73 71 71 72.5 11.75 0.45 4.2286 4.2258 0.999 1.630
2 0.3307 13 33.009 38.093 5.084 73 72 72 71 71 71.5 11.75 0.45 4.2433 4.2258 0.996 1.633
3 0.3307 13 38.093 43.173 5.080 73 71 72 71 71 71.3 11.75 0.45 4.2419 4.2258 0.996 1.634
AVG = 0.997 0.32
AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = 0.994
AVERAGE DH@ = 1.723
(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions
K1 =17.64 oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 oK/mm Hg (Metric)
Tm =Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric) DH@ = 0.75 q DH Vm(std)
Vcr(std) Vm
(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions
Tamb =Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric)
K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration REFERENCE IN OUT
(3)=DGM calibration factor 32 33 32
72 73 73
203 203 202
TEMPERATURE SENSORS oF
2022 Pre-Calibration
Console #9
30
19
12
R Kitchen
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical orifice, Vcr (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.
()2 ()
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.
TECHNICIAN:INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)
DATE:11/23/2022 METER SERIAL #:28152 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg):25.50 25.50 25.50 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,
METER PART #:Console 9 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #:1453S EQUIPMENT ID #:ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
K'TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED
FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3)AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN)DGM DH (1)(2)(3)Y
ORIFICE #RUN #(AVG)(in Hg)INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG q (in H2O)Vm (STD)Vcr (STD)Y VARIATION (%)DH@
1 0.3307 13 58.159 63.515 5.356 73 70 72 68 70 70.0 12.50 0.44 4.5542 4.5672 1.003 1.576
2 0.3307 13 63.515 68.550 5.035 73 72 73 70 72 71.8 11.75 0.44 4.2671 4.2931 1.006 1.571
3 0.3307 13 68.550 73.604 5.054 73 73 73 72 72 72.5 11.75 0.44 4.2772 4.2931 1.004 1.569
AVG = 1.004 0.00
1
2
3
AVG =
1
2
3
AVG =
AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = 1.004
AVERAGE DH@ = 1.572
(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions
K1 =17.64 oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 oK/mm Hg (Metric)
Tm =Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric) DH@ = 0.75 q DH Vm(std)
Vcr(std) Vm
(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions
Tamb =Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric)
K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration REFERENCE IN OUT
(3)=DGM calibration factor
TEMPERATURE SENSORS oF
Post Calibration
Cargill
R Kitchen
Console #9
12
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm(std), and the critical orifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.
()2 ()
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Date:Pitot Tube Identification:
Technician:
Dt=0.375 Is PA = PB ?
Is 1.05 • Dt  PA & PB  1.50 • Dt ?
PA = 0.474
PB =0.474
a1 < 10o a1 = o
a2 < 10o a2 = o
b1 < 5o b1 = o
b2 < 5o b2 = o
Z  0.125 in.Z = in.
W W  0.03125 in.W = in.
W > 3 inches W = in.
Z > 3/4 inch Z = in.
Y ≥ 3 inches Y = in.
The pitot tube meets the specifications for a calibration factor of 0.84?Yes
Reference:
TemperatureSource Reference Sensor
(Medium)(oF)(oF)
Probe AIR 68 68
AIR 68 68
ICE WATER 33 33
BOIL WATER 203 202
SILICONE OIL
Heat Check 248
Temperature Sensor Calibration
0
0
1Stack
Omega CL3512A
Probe Yes
Yes
Continuity Check
Temperature TemperatureDifference
(oF)
0
in.
in.
Yes
Yes
0.004
6.75
1
3 1/2
12/28/21 51 G-4
M. McNamara
in.
0.025
1
0
1
1
b2
b1
B
A
w
Dt
PA
PB
Stack Emission Analysis 391 E 620 S, American Fork, UT 84003
Accurate ● Reliable ● Qualified 801-492-9106
Standard Pitot ID:Date:
Cp(std):Technician:
Tunnel Diameter (Round):Pb (in. Hg):
Leak check completed:Temperature (°F):
Side A
Test #
ΔPstd (in.
H2O)
ΔPs
(in. H2O)Cp(s)Deviation
1 0.54 0.87 0.780 0.001
2 0.54 0.87 0.780 0.001
3 0.53 0.86 0.777 -0.002
Cp(A)0.779 0.0000
Average Deviation 0.0012
Average Deviation must be <= 0.01
Calibrations were completed according to CFR 40, Part 60, Appendix A, Method 2, Section 10.
Calibrations were completed with an Environmental Supply PM10 cyclone.
TETCO
Pitot Tube Wind Tunnel Calibration PM10 2022
S-Type Pitot ID Test Velocity Cp(average)
30.0''25.65
Yes 33
P-785 3000 ft/min 0.779
60-1 2/25/22
0.99 D Kitchen/M McNamara
𝐶𝑜(𝑟)=𝐶𝑜(𝑟𝑟𝑑)
Δ𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑑
Δ𝑝𝑟
Deviation =𝐶𝑜𝑟−ҧ𝐶(𝐴𝑜𝑟𝐴)
𝐶𝑜(𝐴)=ҧ𝐶𝑜𝑟for Side A 𝐶𝑜(𝐴)=ҧ𝐶𝑜𝑟for Side B
Date:1/4/22 Calibrator:Reference:
Temperature Temperature
Source Difference
(Medium)(oF)
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 1
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 1
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 1
Water 0
Water 0
Water -2
Water 1
Water -2
Water 1
Water 0
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water -2
Water 1
Water -2
Water 1
Water -1
Water 0
Water -1
Water 1
Water -1
202
33 33
Impinger Out K 33 34
204 203
33 33
Impinger Out J
Impinger Out H
Impinger Out I
34
203
34
202
33
204
33
204
204
204
33
G
H
Oven (3)33 33
204 204
Oven (4)33
204
Oven 33 33
204 204
Oven 33 33
33
204 204
Oven (3)
A
203203
33
Oven (3)33 33
Oven (4)
Thermocouple
Location
203 203
Impinger Out F 33 33
203
204
204
203 204
204 204
33
32
Impinger Out G
204 202
Oven (3)32
204 204
32 32
204Oven (4)
204
Impinger Out D 33 34
204 202
Impinger Out E 33 34
204 204
204
33 34
204Impinger Out B
Impinger Out C 33 33
204 202
204
Impinger Out A 33 33
204
Oven (3)
Oven (4)
TETCO
Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration
B
C 203 203
32 32
33 33
204
33 34
Mike McNamara Omega CL3512A
Unit ID Reference
(oF)
Sensor
(oF)
Temperature
33
D
E
Oven 33 33
204 204F
Oven (4)
Balance Denver Instruments, Model A-250, SN B045284
Weights Used Denver Instruments Weight Set,
SN 98-115146
Certified Weight Measured Weight Difference
grams grams grams
0.1000 0.1000 0.0000
0.5000 0.5000 0.0000
1.0000 1.0000 0.0000
10.0000 10.0000 0.0000
50.0000 50.0000 0.0000
100.0000 100.0000 0.0000
120.0000 120.0000 0.0000
150.0000 149.9999 0.0001
Technician Michael McNamara
TETCO
Annual Balance Calibration Check
Date 1/04/22

F
APPENDIX F

The testing protocol and other correspondence related to the test is included here.

COMPLIANCE EMISSION TESTING PROTOCOL
FOR PM10, AND CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE MATTER
CARGILL INCORPORATED, SALT DIVISION, GRANTSVILLE, UTAH

CARMEN SYSTEM CYCLONE EXHAUST

Project Organization and Responsibility

The following personnel and the testing contractor are presently anticipated to be involved in the
testing program. The Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality
(DAQ) and EPA may have their own personnel to observe all phases including the process.

Company Contacts
Cargill Incorporated, Salt Division Carmen Ontiveros 661 586-1240
P O Box 648 Jackson Nash 218 242-4934
Grantsville, Utah 84029

TETCO Dean Kitchen 801492-9106
391 East 620 South
American Fork, Utah 84003

Facility and Location

Cargill Incorporated, Salt Division is located approximately 40 miles west of Salt Lake City,
Utah on the north side of I-80 at Exit 77 along Rowley Road. The source to be tested is the
Carmen System Cyclone exhaust.

Test Objective

The test objective is to comply with the facility’s approval order number DAQE-
AN0107220016-16.

Testing procedures on the Carmen System Cyclone will include accumulating process and
production data as well as testing for PM10 particulate matter emissions using EPA Method
201A. Condensible particulate matter (CPM) will be measured according to EPA Method 202
and is not for compliance but informational purposes only.

Test Schedule

It is planned to complete this testing project November 21-22, 2022. It is anticipated testing will
begin the afternoon of November 21st, or the morning of November 22nd.

2
Site Access

The testing site is accessed by man-basket.

Potential Hazards

Moving Equipment - yes
Hot Equipment - No
Chemical - No
Other - Yes Elevated Work, Noise

Process Data

All operational and instrumentation data will be made available to DAQ personnel. The facility
will run at normal conditions.

Quality Assurance

All testing and analysis in these tests will be conducted according to Methods 201A, 202 and
appropriate sections of 40 CFR 51 Appendix M.

Reporting

Reporting will be prepared by the testing contractor according to EPA Quality Assurance
Guidelines. A complete copy of raw data and test calculations summary will be included in the
reports. All process and production data will be recorded by Cargill Incorporated, Salt Division
personnel for inspection by DAQ and EPA, if requested.

Test Procedures

The Carmen System will be tested according to EPA Method 201A. The back-half will be
sampled according to EPA Method 202 as specified in 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix M. Method
202 is not for compliance but for informational purposes only. Specific procedures are as
follows:

1. The inside diameter of the Carmen System Exhaust is 47.5 inches. The ports are located
92.5 inches (1.95 diameters) upstream from the next disturbance and 104 inches (2.19
diameters) downstream from the last disturbance. It is planned to sample six sample
points per port, for a total of twelve sample points. The sample location and the number

3
of sample points comply with the requirements of EPA Method 1 as the maximum
number of required sample points for EPA Method 201A is twelve.

2. EPA Method 2 will be used to determine the gas stream velocity. Type “S” pitot tubes
will be used with a Cp factor of 0.84. Dual inclined/vertical manometers with graduations
of 0.01 inches of water will be used. Direction of gas flow will be checked for gas
cyclonics prior to testing.

3. Target test time will be at least 60 minutes for the Method 201A tests.

4. EPA Method 3 will be used to determine the gas stream dry molecular weight if the
exhaust gas is not ambient. An integrated flue gas sample will be taken from the exhaust
line after the dry gas meter orifice during each test run and analyzed at the completion of
the test with an Orsat to determine the molecular weight of the effluent gas stream. If the
exhaust gas is ambient air then TETCO will use a dry molecular weight of 28.84 lb/lbmol
(20.9 percent O2, 79.1 percent N2) in all calculations.

5. EPA Method 4 will be followed to determine the gas stream moisture content.

6. Probe liners will be Teflon or borosilicate glass for the Method 201A tests.

7. The back-half, or condensible particulate matter will be handled according to EPA
Method 202 and will be for informational purposes only.

8. The glass fiber filters used will meet the requirements of EPA Method 201A.

9. The barometric pressure will be measured with a barometer which is periodically checked
against a mercury barometer. The barometer will be checked prior to testing to assure an
accurate barometric pressure.

10. All current calibration data is submitted with this protocol, except nozzle calibration
which will be done at the test site. Nozzle calibration will be included on the first page of
each set of run sheets for each respective test run. Any calibration that is not current will
be re-calibrated prior to the test dates.

11. Any necessary preparation and clean-up by the contractor will be performed in the
contractor's sampling trailer or a clean area on Cargill’s property. The laboratory work
and analysis will be done by the contractor as soon as possible after the test project at 391
East 620 South, American Fork, Utah.

12. Verbal results will be reported to Doug Fraser of Cargill Incorporated, Salt Division. The
written report will follow within 30 days following the completion of the test.

13. If maintenance or operating problems arise during the test, the test may be stopped. This

4
determination will be made by Cargill Incorporated, Salt Division representatives and
operating personnel in consultation with DAQ representatives

Estimates of Test Parameters

The values below are estimates of the stack flow rates and temperatures. These are estimates
only and are not intended to reflect permitted values.

Temperature °F 145
Moisture% 4-5
Velocity fpm 3,100

Appendix A

Facility Schematic

Carmen System Cyclone
Facility:
Stack Identification:

Cyclone
2Number of Ports
Process
Type:
Control Unit
Type:Salt Cooler Dryer
5Estimated Moisture, percent
140Estimated Temperature, oF
3,100Estimated Velocity, fpm
104"b: Distance downstream from last disturbance, feet
35'g: Distance of Sample Level to ground, feet
47.5 Stack Inside Diameter, inches
Cargill Incorporated
Carmen System Exhaust
a: Distance upstream from next disturbance, feet 92.5"a
g
b
Figure 1. Facility Schematic Representation, Carmen System

Appendix B

Calibration Data

METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.
TECHNICIAN:INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)
DATE:12/16/21 METER SERIAL #:27863 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg):25.35 25.35 25.35 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,
METER PART #:Console 4 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #:1453S EQUIPMENT ID #:ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
K'TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED
FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3)AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN)DGM DH (1)(2)(3)Y
ORIFICE #RUN #(AVG)(in Hg)INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG q (in H2O)Vm (STD)Vcr (STD)Y VARIATION (%)DH@
1 0.8137 11 7.768 12.922 5.154 73 78 81 74 74 76.8 4.75 2.70 4.3300 4.2452 0.980 1.597
2 0.8137 11 12.922 18.878 5.956 73 80 82 74 74 77.5 5.50 2.70 4.9968 4.9155 0.984 1.595
3 0.8137 11 18.878 24.020 5.142 73 80 82 74 74 77.5 4.75 2.70 4.3139 4.2452 0.984 1.595
AVG = 0.983 -1.09
1 0.5317 13 91.202 96.241 5.039 71 74 77 69 71 72.8 7.25 1.10 4.2455 4.2419 0.999 1.523
2 0.5317 13 96.241 101.297 5.056 71 76 78 72 73 74.8 7.25 1.10 4.2439 4.2419 1.000 1.517
3 0.5317 13 101.297 106.364 5.067 71 77 79 73 74 75.8 7.25 1.10 4.2452 4.2419 0.999 1.514
AVG = 0.999 0.57
1 0.3307 13 24.133 29.555 5.422 74 76 76 76 74 75.5 12.50 0.41 4.5357 4.5360 1.000 1.465
2 0.3307 13 29.555 35.202 5.647 74 75 76 74 74 74.8 13.00 0.41 4.7305 4.7175 0.997 1.467
3 0.3307 13 35.202 40.306 5.104 74 75 78 74 76 75.8 11.75 0.41 4.2677 4.2639 0.999 1.464
AVG = 0.999 0.52
AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = 0.994
AVERAGE DH@ = 1.527
(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions
K1 =17.64 oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 oK/mm Hg (Metric)
Tm =Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric) DH@ = 0.75 q DH Vm(std)
Vcr(std) Vm
(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions
Tamb =Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric)
K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration REFERENCE IN OUT
(3)=DGM calibration factor 32 33 32
72 73 73
203 203 202
TEMPERATURE SENSORS oF
2022 Pre-Calibration
Console #4
30
19
12
R Kitchen
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm(std), and the critical orifice, Vcr (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.
()2 ()
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Date:Pitot Tube Identification:
Technician:
Dt=0.375 Is PA = PB ?
Is 1.05 • Dt  PA & PB  1.50 • Dt ?
PA = 0.478
PB =0.478
a1 < 10o a1 = o
a2 < 10o a2 = o
b1 < 5o b1 = o
b2 < 5o b2 = o
Z  0.125 in.Z = in.
W W  0.03125 in.W = in.
W > 3 inches W = in.
Z > 3/4 inch Z = in.
Y ≥ 3 inches Y = in.
The pitot tube meets the specifications for a calibration factor of 0.84?Yes
Reference:
TemperatureSource Reference Sensor
(Medium)(oF)(oF)
Probe AIR 68 70
AIR 68 70
ICE WATER 33 33
BOIL WATER 203 203
SILICONE OIL
Heat Check 248
Temperature Sensor Calibration
2
0
0Stack
Omega CL3512A
Probe Yes
Yes
Continuity Check
Temperature TemperatureDifference
(oF)
2
in.
in.
Yes
Yes
0.004
5
1
3 1/2
12/28/21 51 G
M. McNamara
in.
0.008
0
0
1
1
b2
b1
B
A
w
Dt
PA
PB
Stack Emission Analysis 391 E 620 S, American Fork, UT 84003
Accurate ● Reliable ● Qualified 801-492-9106
Standard Pitot ID:Date:
Cp(std):Technician:
Tunnel Diameter (Round):Pb (in. Hg):
Leak check completed:Temperature (°F):
Side A
Test #
ΔPstd (in.
H2O)
ΔPs
(in. H2O)Cp(s)Deviation
1 0.54 0.87 0.780 0.001
2 0.54 0.87 0.780 0.001
3 0.53 0.86 0.777 -0.002
Cp(A)0.779 0.0000
Average Deviation 0.0012
Average Deviation must be <= 0.01
Calibrations were completed according to CFR 40, Part 60, Appendix A, Method 2, Section 10.
Calibrations were completed with an Environmental Supply PM10 cyclone.
TETCO
Pitot Tube Wind Tunnel Calibration PM10 2022
S-Type Pitot ID Test Velocity Cp(average)
30.0''25.65
Yes 33
P-785 3000 ft/min 0.779
60-1 2/25/22
0.99 D Kitchen/M McNamara
𝐶𝑜(𝑟)=𝐶𝑜(𝑟𝑟𝑑)
Δ𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑑
Δ𝑝𝑟
Deviation =𝐶𝑜𝑟−ҧ𝐶(𝐴𝑜𝑟𝐴)
𝐶𝑜(𝐴)=ҧ𝐶𝑜𝑟for Side A 𝐶𝑜(𝐴)=ҧ𝐶𝑜𝑟for Side B
Stack Emission Analysis 391 E 620 S, American Fork, UT 84003
Accurate ● Reliable ● Qualified 801-492-9106
Standard Pitot ID:Date:
Cp(std):Technician:
Tunnel Diameter (Round):Pb (in. Hg):
Leak check completed:Temperature (°F):
Side A
Test #
ΔPstd (in.
H2O)
ΔPs
(in. H2O)Cp(s)Deviation
1 0.53 0.87 0.773 0.003
2 0.52 0.87 0.765 -0.004
3 0.52 0.86 0.770 0.001
Cp(A)0.769 0.0000
Average Deviation 0.0026
Average Deviation must be <= 0.01
Calibrations were completed according to CFR 40, Part 60, Appendix A, Method 2, Section 10.
Calibrations were completed with an Environmental Supply PM10 cyclone.
TETCO
Pitot Tube Wind Tunnel Calibration PM10 2022
S-Type Pitot ID Test Velocity Cp(average)
30.0''25.65
Yes 33
P-786 3000 ft/min 0.769
60-1 2/25/22
0.99 D Kitchen/M McNamara
𝐶𝑜(𝑟)=𝐶𝑜(𝑟𝑟𝑑)
Δ𝑝𝑟𝑟𝑑
Δ𝑝𝑟
Deviation =𝐶𝑜𝑟−ҧ𝐶(𝐴𝑜𝑟𝐴)
𝐶𝑜(𝐴)=ҧ𝐶𝑜𝑟for Side A 𝐶𝑜(𝐴)=ҧ𝐶𝑜𝑟for Side B
Date:1/4/22 Calibrator:Reference:
Temperature Temperature
Source Difference
(Medium)(oF)
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 1
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 1
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 1
Water 0
Water 0
Water -2
Water 1
Water -2
Water 1
Water 0
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water -2
Water 1
Water -2
Water 1
Water -1
Water 0
Water -1
Water 1
Water -1
202
33 33
Impinger Out K 33 34
204 203
33 33
Impinger Out J
Impinger Out H
Impinger Out I
34
203
34
202
33
204
33
204
204
204
33
G
H
Oven (3)33 33
204 204
Oven (4)33
204
Oven 33 33
204 204
Oven 33 33
33
204 204
Oven (3)
A
203203
33
Oven (3)33 33
Oven (4)
Thermocouple
Location
203 203
Impinger Out F 33 33
203
204
204
203 204
204 204
33
32
Impinger Out G
204 202
Oven (3)32
204 204
32 32
204Oven (4)
204
Impinger Out D 33 34
204 202
Impinger Out E 33 34
204 204
204
33 34
204Impinger Out B
Impinger Out C 33 33
204 202
204
Impinger Out A 33 33
204
Oven (3)
Oven (4)
TETCO
Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration
B
C 203 203
32 32
33 33
204
33 34
Mike McNamara Omega CL3512A
Unit ID Reference
(oF)
Sensor
(oF)
Temperature
33
D
E
Oven 33 33
204 204F
Oven (4)