The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDAQ-2025-0024741 DAQC-439-25 Site ID 10119 (B4) MEMORANDUM TO: STACK TEST FILE – CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager FROM: Robert Sirrine, Environmental Scientist DATE: May 8, 2025 SUBJECT: Location: 685 South Chevron Way, Salt Lake City, Utah Contact: Tony Pollock – 801-539-7162, cell 435-849-2715 Tester: Alliance Technical Group, Alan Jensen 847-220-3949 Source: FCCU Regenerator FRS ID #: UT0000004901100003 Permit# AO DAQE-AN101190107-24 dated December 3, 2024 Subject: Review of Pretest Protocol received May 8, 2025 On May 8, 2025, the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a protocol for stack emissions testing of the Chevron Products Company FCCU located at the Salt Lake Refinery, in Salt Lake City, Utah. Testing will be performed August 12, 2025, to determine compliance with the PM and PM2.5 emission limits and factors in AO Conditions II.B.7.d. and SIP Section IX.H.11.g.i.B.I, Consent Decree Number C 03-04650 PROTOCOL CONDITIONS: 1. RM 1 used to determine sample point locations: OK 2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate: OK 3. RM 3A used to determine O2 and CO2 concentrations of the gas stream: OK 4. RM 4 used to determine moisture content: OK 5. RM 5F used to determine Non-Sulfate PM mass emission rates: OK DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted. CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable. RECOMMENDATION: Send protocol review and test date confirmation notice. ATTACHMENTS: Chevron test protocol for the FCCU NSPM emissions received May 8, 2025. * - / $ - - $ ) Emission Compliance Test Protocol Chevron Products Company Salt Lake City Refinery 685 South Chevron Way North Salt Lake, Utah 84054 Source to be Tested: FCCU Proposed Test Date: August 12, 2025 Project No. AST-2025-2071-003 Prepared By Alliance Technical Group, LLC 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120 Site Specific Test Plan Test Program Summary AST-2025-2071-003 Chevron – North Salt Lake, UT Page i Regulatory Information Permit No. UDAQ DAQE-AN 101190107-24 Source Information Source Name Source ID Target Parameter Catalyst Regenerator / Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) and Catalyst Regenerator FCCU NSPM Contact Information Test Location Test Company Analytical Laboratory Chevron Products Company Salt Lake City Refinery 685 South Chevron Way North Salt Lake, Utah 84054 Facility Contact Tony Pollock dltf@chevron.com (801) 539-7162 Alliance Technical Group, LLC 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120 Project Manager Charles Horton charles.horton@alliancetg.com (352) 663-7568 Field Team Leader Alan Jensen alan.jensen@alliancetg.com (847) 220-3949 (subject to change) QA/QC Manager Kathleen Shonk katie.shonk@alliancetg.com (812) 452-4785 Test Plan/Report Coordinator Delaine Spangler delaine.spangler@alliancetg.com Alliance Technical Group, LLC 5530 Marshall Street Arvada, CO 80002 Cory Manshack cory.manshack@allianceTG.com (318) 557-9733 Site Specific Test Plan Table of Contents AST-2025-2071-003 Chevron – North Salt Lake, UT Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Facility Description ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Team ............................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Safety Requirements ................................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Summary of Test Program .......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 General Description ..................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded .......................................................... 2-1 2.3 Proposed Test Schedule............................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.4 Emission Limits........................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.5 Test Report .................................................................................................................................................. 2-2 3.0 Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate ........ 3-1 3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A – Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide .............................................................. 3-1 3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content ............................................................................ 3-2 3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 5F – Non-Sulfate Particulate Matter ..................................................... 3-2 3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 – Gas Dilution System Certification .............................................. 3-2 3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control – U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A.............................................. 3-2 4.0 Quality Assurance Program ......................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Equipment ................................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Field Sampling ............................................................................................................................................ 4-2 4.3 Analytical Laboratory.................................................................................................................................. 4-2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-2: Project Team ........................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Table 2-1: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule ........................................................................................ 2-1 Table 2-3: Emission Limits ...................................................................................................................................... 2-1 Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................. 3-1 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Method 1 Field Data Sheet Appendix B Example Field Data Sheets Site Specific Test Plan Introduction AST-2025-2071-003 Chevron – North Salt Lake, UT Page 1-1 1.0 Introduction Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Chevron Products Company (Chevron) to conduct compliance testing at the North Salt Lake, Utah facility. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Permit No. DAQE-AN 101190107-24. Testing will be conducted as outlined in Table 1-1 below. This emission compliance test protocol has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of the UDAQ permit. Table 1-1: Test Matrix Emission Source Tested Parameters Catalyst Regenerator / Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) and Catalyst Regenerator (FCCU) Non-Sulfate Particulate Matter (NSPM) 1.1 Facility Description Chevron Salt Lake Refinery is a petroleum refinery that processes crude oil. The source consists of one FCC unit, a delayed coking unit, a catalytic reforming unit, hydrotreating units and two sulfur recovery units. The source also has assorted heaters, boilers, cooling towers, storage tanks, flares, and similar fugitive emissions. The refinery operates with a flare gas recovery system on two of its three hydrocarbon flares. 1.2 Project Team Personnel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table. Table 1-2: Project Team Chevron Personnel Tony Pollock Regulatory Agency UDAQ Alliance Personnel Alan Jensen other field personnel assigned at time of testing event 1.3 Safety Requirements Testing personnel will undergo site-specific safety training for all applicable areas upon arrival at the site. Alliance personnel will have current OSHA or MSHA safety training and be equipped with hard hats, safety glasses with side shields, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fire resistant clothing, and fall protection (including shock corded lanyards and full-body harnesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves in a manner consistent with Client and Alliance’s safety policies. A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader. Site Specific Test Plan Summary of Test Programs AST-2025-2071-003 Chevron – North Salt Lake, UT Page 2-1 2.0 Summary of Test Program To satisfy the requirements of UDAQ permit AN 101190107-24, the facility will conduct a performance test program to determine the compliance status of the FCCU. 2.1 General Description All testing will be performed in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1, 2, 3A, 4, and 5F. Table 2-1 presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program. The following is a summary of the test objectives. • Testing will be performed to demonstrate compliance with the UDAQ Permit. • Emissions testing will be conducted on the exhaust of the FCCU. • Performance testing will be conducted at the maximum normal operation load. • Each of the three (3) test runs will be approximately 63 minutes in duration. 2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded Plant personnel will collect operational and parametric data at least once every 15 minutes during the testing. The following list identifies the measurements, observations and records that will be collected during the testing program: • Coke Burn-Off 2.3 Proposed Test Schedule Table 2-1 presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program. Table 2-1: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule Testing Location Parameter US EPA Method No. of Runs Run Duration Est. Onsite Time August 12, 2025 Equipment Setup & Pretest QA/QC Checks 10 hr FCC VFR 1-2 3 63 min O2/CO2 3A BWS 4 NSPM 5F 2.4 Emission Limits Emission limits for each pollutant are below. Table 2-3: Emission Limits Source Pollutant Citation FCC NSPM – 1.0 lbs/1000 lbs of coke burned Approval Order 40 CFR 63 Subpart UUU, EPA Consent Decree Site Specific Test Plan Summary of Test Programs AST-2025-2071-003 Chevron – North Salt Lake, UT Page 2-2 Source Pollutant Citation No. C 03‐04650 2.5 Test Report The final test report must be submitted within 60 days of the completion of the performance test and will include the following information. The report will be submitted via EPA CDX/CEDRI. • Introduction – Brief discussion of project scope of work and activities. • Results and Discussion – A summary of test results and process/control system operational data with comparison to regulatory requirements or vendor guarantees along with a description of process conditions and/or testing deviations that may have affected the testing results. • Methodology – A description of the sampling and analytical methodologies. • Sample Calculations – Example calculations for each target parameter. • Field Data – Copies of actual handwritten or electronic field data sheets. • Laboratory Data – Copies of laboratory report(s) and chain of custody(s). • Quality Control Data – Copies of all instrument calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates. • Process Operating/Control System Data – Process operating and control system data (as provided by Chevron) to support the test results. Site Specific Test Plan Testing Methodology AST-2025-2071-003 Chevron – North Salt Lake, UT Page 3-1 3.0 Testing Methodology This section provides a description of the sampling and analytical procedures for each test method that will be employed during the test program. All equipment, procedures and quality assurance measures necessary for the completion of the test program meet or exceed the specifications of each relevant test method. The emission testing program will be conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology Parameter U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods Notes/Remarks Volumetric Flow Rate 1 & 2 Full Velocity Traverses Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide 3A Instrumental Analysis Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis Non-Sulfate Particulate Matter 5F Isokinetic Sampling Gas Dilution System Certification 205 --- All stack diameters, depths, widths, upstream and downstream disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be measured on site with an EPA Method 1 verification measurement provided by the Field Team Leader. These measurements will be included in the test report. 3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points will be selected in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream distances will be equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-2 (measuring velocity alone) in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 1. Full velocity traverses will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement system will consist of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature will be measured with a K- type thermocouple and pyrometer. Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings will be recorded during each test run. The data collected will be utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2. 3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A – Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide The oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A. Data will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist of a stainless steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line is used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6. Site Specific Test Plan Testing Methodology AST-2025-2071-003 Chevron – North Salt Lake, UT Page 3-2 3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content The stack gas moisture content will be determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas conditioning train will consist of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger will be filled with a known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger will be analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on the same analytical balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed. 3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 5F – Non-Sulfate Particulate Matter The non-sulfate filterable particulate matter sampling will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 5F. The complete sampling system will consist of a siliconized nozzle, heated stainless steel-lined probe, pre-weighed heated quartz filter, gas conditioning train, pump and calibrated dry gas meter. The gas conditioning train will consist of four (4) chilled impingers – the first and second will contain 100 mL of H2O, the third impinger will be initially empty and the fourth will contain 200-300 grams of silica gel. The probe liner and filter heating systems will be maintained at a temperature of 120 ± 14°C (248 ±25°F) and the impinger temperature will be maintained at 20°C (68°F) or less throughout the testing. Following the completion of each test run, the sampling train will be leak checked at a vacuum pressure greater than or equal to the highest vacuum pressure observed during the run, and the contents of the impingers will be measured for moisture gain. The probe and nozzle will be rinsed and brushed six (6) times with water to remove any adhering particulate matter. This rinse will be recovered in Container 2. The front half of the filter holder will be rinsed three (3) times with water and this rinse will be added to Container 2. The pre-weighed quartz filter will be carefully removed and placed in Container 1. All containers will be sealed, labeled and liquid levels marked for transport to the identified laboratory. 3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 – Gas Dilution System Certification A calibration gas dilution system field check will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method 205. An initial three (3) point calibration will be conducted, using individual Protocol 1 gases, on the analyzer used to complete the dilution system field check. Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates will be utilized to force the dilution system to perform two dilutions on each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases will be sent directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer response must agree within 2% of the actual diluted gas concentration. A second Protocol 1 calibration gas, with a cylinder concentration within 10% of one of the gas divider settings described above, will be introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the analyzer response must agree within 2%. These steps will be repeated three (3) times. 3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control – U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol 1 (+/- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report. Low Level gas will be introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas concentration and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will be recorded. This process will be repeated for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration gases will be sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. The Calibration Error for each gas must be within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference. Site Specific Test Plan Testing Methodology AST-2025-2071-003 Chevron – North Salt Lake, UT Page 3-3 High or Mid-Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppm/% (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas concentration will be recorded. The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value, and this value will be recorded. Next, Low-Level gas will be introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppm/% (whichever was less restrictive) will be recorded. If the Low- Level gas is zero gas, the acceptable response must be 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration or 0.5 ppm/% (whichever was less restrictive). The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value, and this value will be recorded. The measurement system response time and initial system bias will be determined from these data. The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference. High or Mid-Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be introduced at the probe. After the analyzer response is stable, the value will be recorded. Next, Low-Level gas will be introduced at the probe, and the analyzer value will be recorded once it reaches a stable response. The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference or the data is invalidated, and the Calibration Error Test and System Bias must be repeated. The Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias must be within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference or the Calibration Error Test and System Bias must be repeated. To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check will be conducted prior to initiating testing. The pollutant concentrations will be measured at twelve traverse points (as described in Method 1) or three points (16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each traverse point will be sampled for a minimum of twice the system response time. If the pollutant concentration at each traverse point does not differ more than 5% or 0.5 ppm/0.3% (whichever is less restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling will be conducted during the test runs. If the pollutant concentration does not meet these specifications but differs less than 10% or 1.0 ppm/0.5% from the average concentration, then three (3) point sampling will be conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - 16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter – 0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters from the stack wall). If the pollutant concentration differs by more than 10% or 1.0 ppm/0.5% from the average concentration, then sampling will be conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse points. Copies of stratification check data will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report. A Data Acquisition System with battery backup will be used to record the instrument response in one (1) minute averages. The data will be continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the completion of testing, the data will also be saved to the Alliance server. All data will be reviewed by the Field Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance’s office, all written and electronic data will be relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review will be performed by the Project Manager. Site Specific Test Plan Quality Assurance Program AST-2025-2071-003 Chevron – North Salt Lake, UT Page 4-1 4.0 Quality Assurance Program Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Management Plan to ensure the continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme. Adherence to prescribed procedures is quite often the most applicable QC check. 4.1 Equipment Field test equipment is assigned a unique, permanent identification number. Prior to mobilizing for the test program, equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipment problems prior to arriving on site. This minimizes lost time on the job site due to equipment failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is unavoidable despite the most rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures. Therefore, replacements for critical equipment or components are brought to the job site. Equipment returning from the field is inspected before it is returned to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and recalibrated where necessary. Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. The calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA-600/R-94/038c, September 1994) are utilized. When these methods are inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recognized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked for completeness and accuracy. Copies of calibration forms are included in the report. The following sections elaborate on the calibration procedures followed by Alliance for these items of equipment. • Dry Gas Meter and Orifice. A full meter calibration using critical orifices as the calibration standard is conducted at least semi-annually, more frequently if required. The meter calibration procedure determines the meter correction factor (Y) and the meter’s orifice pressure differential (ΔH@). Alliance uses approved Alternative Method 009 as a post-test calibration check to ensure that the correction factor has not changed more than 5% since the last full meter calibration. This check is performed after each test series. • Pitot Tubes and Manometers. Type-S pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria required by U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.84 unless a specific coefficient has been determined from a wind tunnel calibration. If a specific coefficient from a wind tunnel calibration has been obtained that coefficient will be used in lieu of 0.84. Standard pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria required by U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.99. Any pitot tubes not meeting the appropriate geometric criteria are discarded and replaced. Manometers are verified to be level and zeroed prior to each test run and do not require further calibration. • Temperature Measuring Devices. All thermocouple sensors mounted in Dry Gas Meter Consoles are calibrated semi-annually with a NIST-traceable thermocouple calibrator (temperature simulator) and verified during field use using a second NIST-traceable meter. NIST-traceable thermocouple calibrators are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory. • Nozzles. Nozzles are measured three (3) times prior to initiating sampling with a caliper. The maximum difference between any two (2) dimensions is 0.004 in. • Digital Calipers. Calipers are calibrated annually by Alliance by using gage blocks that are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory. Site Specific Test Plan Quality Assurance Program AST-2025-2071-003 Chevron – North Salt Lake, UT Page 4-2 • Barometer. The barometric pressure is obtained from a nationally recognized agency or a calibrated barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field trip against a mercury barometer. The barometer is acceptable if the values agree within ± 2 percent absolute. Barometers not meeting this requirement are adjusted or taken out of service. • Balances and Weights. Balances are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory. A functional check is conducted on the balance each day it is used in the field using a calibration weight. Weights are re-certified every two (2) years by an outside laboratory or internally. If conducted internally, they are weighed on a NIST traceable balance. If the weight does not meet the expected criteria, they are replaced. • Other Equipment. A mass flow controller calibration is conducted on each Environics system annually following the procedures in the Manufacturer’s Operation manual. A methane/ethane penetration factor check is conducted on the total hydrocarbon analyzers equipped with non-methane cutters every six (6) months following the procedures in 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ. Other equipment such as probes, umbilical lines, cold boxes, etc. are routinely maintained and inspected to ensure that they are in good working order. They are repaired or replaced as needed. 4.2 Field Sampling Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test method(s). General QC measures for the test program include: • Cleaned glassware and sample train components will be sealed until assembly. • Sample trains will be leak checked before and after each test run. • Appropriate probe, filter and impinger temperatures will be maintained. • The sampling port will be sealed to prevent air from leaking from the port. • Dry gas meter, ΔP, ΔH, temperature and pump vacuum data will be recorded during each sample point. • An isokinetic sampling rate of 90-110% will be maintained, as applicable. • All raw data will be maintained in organized manner. • All raw data will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability. 4.3 Analytical Laboratory Analytical laboratory selection for sample analyses is based on the capabilities, certifications and accreditations that the laboratory possesses. An approved analytical laboratory subcontractor list is maintained with a copy of the certificate and analyte list as evidence of compliance. Alliance assumes responsibility to the client for the subcontractor’s work. Alliance maintains a verifiable copy of the results with chain of custody documentation. Appendix A Method 1 Data Location Source Project No. Date: in in 0.00 in --in --ft2 --in ft --(must be ≥ 0.5) ft --(must be ≥ 2) -- Measurer (Initial and Date): Reviewer (Initial and Date): 23456789101112 1 25.0 16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 6.3 5.6 5.0 4.5 4.2 1 -- -- -- 2 75.0 50.0 37.5 30.0 25.0 21.4 18.8 16.7 15.0 13.6 12.5 2 -- -- -- 3 -- 83.3 62.5 50.0 41.7 35.7 31.3 27.8 25.0 31.8 20.8 3 -- -- -- 4 -- -- 87.5 70.0 58.3 50.0 43.8 38.9 35.0 22.7 29.2 4 -- -- -- 5 -- -- -- 90.0 75.0 64.3 56.3 50.0 45.0 40.9 37.5 5 -- -- -- 6 -- -- -- -- 91.7 78.6 68.8 61.1 55.0 50.0 45.8 6 -- -- -- 7 -- -- -- -- -- 92.9 81.3 72.2 65.0 59.1 54.2 7 -- -- -- 8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 93.8 83.3 75.0 68.2 62.5 8 -- -- -- 9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 94.4 85.0 77.3 70.8 9 -- -- -- 10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 95.0 86.4 79.2 10 -- -- -- 11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 95.5 87.5 11 -- -- -- 12 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 95.8 12 -- -- -- *Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point. A = ft. B = ft. Depth of Duct = 0 in. Number of traverse points on a diameter Stack Diagram Cross Sectional Area LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Traverse Point % of Diameter Distance from inside wall Distance from outside of port Equivalent Diameter: No. of Test Ports: Number of Readings per Point: Distance A: Distance A Duct Diameters: Distance B: Distance B Duct Diameters: Minimum Number of Traverse Points: Actual Number of Traverse Points: DUCT Duct Design: Nipple Length: Depth of Duct: Width of Duct: Cross Sectional Area of Duct: Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port: Duct Orientation: -- -- -- Stack Parameters Upstream Disturbance Downstream Disturbance BA Appendix B Cyclonic Flow Check Location -- Source -- Project No. -- Date Sample Point Angle (ΔP=0) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Average -- Method 4 Data Location Source Project No. Parameter Analysis Run 1 Date:-- Impinger No.1234Total Contents H2O H2O Empty Silica -- Initial Mass, g -- Final Mass, g -- Gain -- -- -- -- -- Run 2 Date:-- Impinger No.1234Total Contents H2O H2O Empty Silica -- Initial Mass, g -- Final Mass, g -- Gain -- -- -- -- -- Run 3 Date:-- Impinger No.1234Total Contents H2O H2O Empty Silica -- Initial Mass, g -- Final Mass, g -- Gain -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Gravimetric Isokinetic Field Data Location: Start Time: Source: Date: VALID End Time: Project No.:-- -- Moisture:% est.Est. Tm:°F Pb: --in. Hg Barometric: --in. Hg Est. Ts: --°F Pg: --in. WC Static Press: --in. WC Est. ΔP: --in. WC O2:--% Stack Press: --in. Hg Est. Dn: --in.CO2:--% CO2:--%Target Rate: --scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr. O2:--%LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf) -- N2/CO:--%-- --Leak Rate (cfm):-- -- -- Mid 2 (cf) -- Md: --lb/lb-mole -- --Vacuum (in Hg):-- -- -- Mid 3 (cf) -- Ms: --lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:-- -- -- -- Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb.Amb. Begin End Ideal Actual - 0.00 #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- #DIV/0! #DIV/0!--- Final DGM: Max Vac %ISO BWS 60.0 min 0.000 ft3 -- in. WC -- °F -- °F -- -- in. WC -- -- -- -- Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):-- % ISO -- Pitot Cp/Type: ΔH @ (in.WC): Probe ID: Nozzle ID: Nozzle Dn (in.): Liner Material: Pitot Tube ΔP (in WC) Pitot ID: RE S U L T S -- VmRun Time ΔPTm -- YqaΔHTs -- STACK DATA (EST) -- Run 1 -- -- -- STACK DATA (EST) EQUIPMENT MOIST. DATA Vlc (ml) -- K-FACTOR STACK DATA (FINAL)FILTER NO. Parameter:-- -- -- Meter Box ID: Y: Sa m p l e Pt . Gas Temperatures (°F) DGM Average Amb. Sample Time (minutes) Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) Vs (fps) Pump Vac (in. Hg) Orifice Press. ΔH (in. WC) Gas Temperatures (°F) -- QA/QC Data Location Source Project No. Parameter #1 #2 #3 Dn (Average)Difference -- -- -- Date Probe or Thermocouple ID Reference Temp. (°F) Indicated Temp. (°F)Difference Criteria Probe Length ------ Date Balance ID: Certified Weight ID: Certified Weight Expiration: Certified Weight (g): Measured Weight (g): Weight Difference (g):------------ Flow Rate (lpm):Flow Rate (lpm):Flow Rate (lpm): Clock Time Temperature Clock Time Temperature Clock Time Temperature - ---------- - ---------- - ---------- - ---------- - ---------- Acetone (ml)Acetone (ml)Acetone (ml) -- -- -- Nozzle Diameter (in.) Date Nozzle ID Criteria -- Material Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check Pass ≤ 0.004 in. Date Pitot ID Evidence of damage? Barometer ID Evidence of mis-alignment? Calibration or Repair required? Field Balance Check Posttest Purge Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 ± 1.5 % (absolute) Method 5 Rinse Volumes Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Reagent ByDateField LotField Prep performedLot# Date Barometric Pressure Evidence of damage?Reading Verified Calibration or Repair required? QA Data Location Source Project No. O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet Make -- -- -- Model -- -- -- S/N -- -- -- Operating Range -- -- -- Cylinder ID Zero NA NA NA Mid -- -- -- High -- -- -- Cylinder Certifed Values Zero NA NA NA Mid -- -- -- High -- -- -- Cylinder Expiration Date Zero NA NA NA Mid -- -- -- High -- -- -- Type of Sample Line -- Parameter -- - -- -- -- Response Times Location: Source: Project No.: O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet Zero -- -- -- Low NA NA NA Mid -- -- -- High -- -- -- Average -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- Parameter Response Times, seconds Calibration Data Location: Source: Project No.: Date: O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet Expected Average Concentration -- -- -- Span Between Low -- -- -- High -- -- -- Desired Span -- -- -- Low Range Gas Low NA NA NA High NA NA NA Mid Range Gas Low -- -- -- High -- -- -- High Range Gas Low NA NA NA High NA NA NA Actual Concentration (% or ppm) Zero 0.00 0.00 0.00 Low NA NA NA Mid -- -- -- High -- -- -- Response Time (seconds)-- -- -- Upscale Calibration Gas (CMA)-- -- -- Instrument Response (% or ppm) Zero -- -- -- Low NA NA NA Mid -- -- -- High -- -- -- Performance (% of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.) Zero -- -- -- Low NA NA NA Mid -- -- -- High -- -- -- Status Zero -- -- -- Low NA NA NA Mid -- -- -- High -- -- -- -- -- - -- Parameter -- -- Bias/Drift Determinations Location: Source: Project No.: O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet Run 1 Date -- Span Value - - - Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response - - - Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response #N/A #N/A #N/A Pretest System Zero Response - - - Posttest System Zero Response - - - Pretest System Upscale Response - - - Posttest System Upscale Response - - - Bias (%) Pretest Zero -- -- -- Posttest Zero -- -- -- Pretest Span -- -- -- Posttest Span -- -- -- Drift (%) Zero - - - Mid - - - Run 2 Date -- Span Value - - - Instrument Zero Cal Response - - - Instrument Upscale Cal Response #N/A #N/A #N/A Pretest System Zero Response - - - Posttest System Zero Response - - - Pretest System Upscale Response - - - Posttest System Upscale Response - - - Bias (%) Pretest Zero -- -- -- Posttest Zero -- -- -- Pretest Span -- -- -- Posttest Span -- -- -- Drift (%) Zero - - - Mid - - - Run 3 Date -- Span Value - - - Instrument Zero Cal Response - - - Instrument Upscale Cal Response #N/A #N/A #N/A Pretest System Zero Response - - - Posttest System Zero Response - - - Pretest System Upscale Response - - - Posttest System Upscale Response - - - Bias (%) Pretest Zero -- -- -- Posttest Zero -- -- -- Pretest Span -- -- -- Posttest Span -- -- -- Drift (%) Zero - - - Mid - - - Parameter -- - -- -- -- Run 1 - RM Data Location: Source: Project No.: Date: Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet Unit % dry % dry ppmvd Status Valid Valid Valid Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)--- Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)#N/A #N/A #N/A Pretest System Zero Response --- Posttest System Zero Response --- Average Zero Response (Co)--- Pretest System Cal Response --- Posttest System Cal Response --- Average Cal Response (CM)--- Corrected Run Average (Corr)--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- -- -- - Location: Source: Project No.: Date: Time O2 CO2 NOx (%) (%) (ppm) A-1 2 0:00 3 0:00 4 0:00 5 0:00 6 0:00 B-1 0:00 2 0:00 3 0:00 4 0:00 5 0:00 6 0:00 -- -- -- Single Point Single Point Single Point Average Criteria Met Traverse Point -- - -- -- -- Location: Source: Project No.: Date EPA O2 -- -- -- -- Cylinder Number ID Zero NA Mid -- High -- Cylinder Certified Values Zero 0.0 Mid -- High -- Instrument Response (% or ppm) Zero -- Mid -- High -- Calibration Gas Selection (% of Span) Mid -- High -- Calibration Error Performance (% of Span) Zero -- Mid -- High -- Linearity (% of Range) -- (%) lpm (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)( ± 2 %) 10L/10L* 90.0 7.0 ---- 10L/10L* 80.0 7.0 ---- 10L/5L 80.0 5.0 ---- 10L/5L 50.0 5.0 ---- 10L/1L 20.0 4.0 ---- 10L/1L 10.0 4.0 ---- (%)( ± 2 %)( ± 2 %)( ± 2 %) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Mid-Level Supply Gas Calibration Direct to Analyzer Calibration Injection 1 Injection 2 Injection 3 Average Gas Analyzer Analyzer Analyzer Analyzer Concentration Concentration Concentration Concentration Concentration (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)( ± 2 %) - --- Analyzer Make: -- -- - -- -- -- Parameter Make Model S/N Span Method Criteria Analyzer Model: -- Analyzer SN: -- Environics ID: -- Component/Balance Gas: O2/N2 Cylinder Gas ID (Dilution): Cylinder Gas Concentration (Dilution), %: *Not all AST Environics Units have 2-10L Mass Flow Controllers. For these units the 90% @ 7lpm and 80% @ 7lpm injections will not be conducted. Cylinder Gas ID (Mid-Level): Cylinder Gas Concentration (Mid-Level), %: Target Mass Flow Contollers Target Dilution Target Flow Rate Target Concentration Actual Concentration Injection 1 Analyzer Concentration Injection 2 Analyzer Concentration Injection 3 Analyzer Concentration Average Analyzer Concentration Difference Average Error Average Analyzer Concentration Injection 1 Error Injection 2 Error Injection 3 Error Difference Average Error