DSHW-2024-005440

Class V
Class V Permit Modification
Mountainview Landfill
Salt Lake City, Utah

Prepared by
Hansen, Allen & Luce, Inc.

Prepared for
Waste Management of Utah, Inc.

March 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1
2 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................... 2
2.2 SOIL CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................ 2
2.3 HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTING .............................................................................................. 3
3 DESIGN ................................................................................................................................. 5
3.1 GRADING ......................................................................................................................... 5
3.2 FINAL COVER DESIGN ...................................................................................................... 5
3.2.1 Regulatory Requirements ............................................................................................ 5
3.2.2 Final Cover ................................................................................................................. 6
3.3 DRAINAGE ....................................................................................................................... 6
3.3.1 Existing Site Conditions .............................................................................................. 6
3.3.2 Design Criteria ........................................................................................................... 6
3.3.3 Hydrologic Analysis .................................................................................................... 6
3.3.4 Drainage Improvements................................................................................................. 7
3.4 SEQUENCING .................................................................................................................... 8
3.5 ANTICIPATED SERVICE LIFE ............................................................................................. 9
4 OPERATIONS PLAN ........................................................................................................ 10
4.1 WASTE ACCEPTANCE ..................................................................................................... 10
4.2 LANDFILL EQUIPMENT ................................................................................................... 10
4.3 LANDFILL PERSONNEL ................................................................................................... 11
4.4 TRAINING ....................................................................................................................... 11
4.5 SIGNAGE ........................................................................................................................ 11
4.6 WASTE INSPECTION PROCEDURES ................................................................................. 12
4.7 DISPOSAL PROCEDURES AND CONTINGENCY PLANS FOR FIRE OR EXPLOSION ............... 12
4.8 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT ................................................................................... 13
4.9 LITTER, ODOR, VECTOR, AND DUST CONTROL .............................................................. 13
4.10 NOISE LEVELS................................................................................................................ 13
4.11 EXPLOSIVE GAS MONITORING ....................................................................................... 13
4.12 GROUNDWATER MONITORING ....................................................................................... 14
4.13 SPILL PREVENTION ........................................................................................................ 14
4.14 RECORDKEEPING PROCEDURES ...................................................................................... 14
4.15 SPECIAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS FOR ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS ........... 14
4.15.1 Additional Operating Record Requirement. ......................................................... 14
4.15.2 Asbestos Waste Separation From Existing Solid Waste ....................................... 15
4.15.3 Location Mapping Requirement ........................................................................... 15
4.15.4 Handling ............................................................................................................... 15
4.15.5 Material and Containerizing Requirements.......................................................... 15
4.15.6 Disposal Standards. .............................................................................................. 15
5 CLOSURE AND POST CLOSURE .................................................................................. 17
5.1 CLOSURE........................................................................................................................ 17
5.1.1 Sequencing ................................................................................................................ 17
5.1.2 Cover Design ............................................................................................................ 17
5.1.3 Grading ..................................................................................................................... 17
5.1.4 Drainage ................................................................................................................... 17
5.1.5 Closure Costs ............................................................................................................ 17
5.1.6 Recording .................................................................................................................. 17
5.2 POST CLOSURE MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................... 18
5.2.1 Final Cover Integrity ................................................................................................ 18
5.2.2 Drainage System ....................................................................................................... 18
5.2.3 Vegetative Cover ....................................................................................................... 18
5.2.4 Groundwater Monitoring Network ........................................................................... 19
5.2.5 Post-Closure Cost Estimate ...................................................................................... 19
5.2.6 Post-Closure Care Period Contact ........................................................................... 19
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 20

TABLES
1 Summary of Soils Laboratory Testing
2 Closure and Post Closure Estimate

FIGURES
1 Site Location Map
2 Vicinity Map
3 Groundwater Head Contour Map
4 USGS Topographic Map
5 Asbestos Area
6 Topographic Map Update
7 Floodplain Map
8 Wetlands Map

DRAWINGS
1 Final Drainage Plan
2 February 24, 2024 VS Final Waste Grade
3 Permitted Top of Waste Grades
4 Details

APPENDICES
A Facility Records
A-1 Permit Renewal Application
A-2 Proof of Ownership
A-3 Previous Permit Correspondence
A-4 Fugitive Dust Control Plan
A-5 Site Facility Inspection Form
B Soils Testing
C Well Logs
D Drainage Analysis
E Load Inspection Program
F Groundwater Monitoring Plan

1

1 INTRODUCTION

This report has been prepared as part of the Class V permit modification requirements in accordance with
UTAH SOLID WASTE PERMITTING AND MANAGEMENT RULES UTAH ADMINISTRATIVE
CODE (R315-301 through 320) for the Mountainview Landfill (MVLF).

The impetus to change the current permitted layout is driven by the increased demand being placed on the
Mountainview Landfill facility from current and future construction projects requiring disposal of asbestos
containing material (ACM). These and other projects have consumed more space than was anticipated at
Mountainview. To continue providing these services for current and future demolition and renovation
projects, the layout of the asbestos receiving and disposal area needs to be modified. It should be noted that
Mountainview is the primary asbestos disposal facility within Salt Lake County, and currently the only one
who regularly accepts friable ACM. This service is vital to the redevelopment projects being undertaken
by the State of Utah Division of Facilities Construction and Management and others, to ensure these
materials continue to be properly handled and disposed of in a manner that is protective to human health
and the environment. The proposed change will allow Mountainview to utilize existing airspace at or near
the top deck for disposal of ACM and construction and demolition (C&D) waste.

The requested modification does not result in any changes to the approved Operating Plan, Final Grading
Plan, Stormwater Management Plan, or other approved permit requirements or conditions. The proposed
layout limits ACM disposal to at or near the top deck of the landfill resulting in over 150 feet of separation
between the base of the asbestos material and the surrounding natural ground. It also prevents asbestos
material from being placed on side-slopes or being used as “sliver fill” material. The vertical separation,
and side-slope limitations both provide increased protection of human health and the environment at the
facility now and into the future.

The purpose for the proposed modification is to revise the layout of the asbestos disposal area at the
Mountainview Class V Landfill (Permit #096R1), Requested herein for DWMRC to approve the
modifications to the footprint of the asbestos receiving area at Mountainview in order to allow for additional
space to dispose of ACM.

This report has been prepared in accordance with applicable Salt Lake County Health Department
(SLCoHD) and UDEQ Regulations. The permit application, and proof of ownership are included in
Appendix A. The MVLF is shown on the site location map described as Figure 1. In particular, this report
discusses soils testing, final cover design, final grading and drainage, and site operations.
2
2 BACKGROUND

MVLF is an existing construction and demolition waste landfill located at 6976 West California Avenue,
Salt Lake City, Utah. The site is owned and operated by Mountainview Landfill, Inc. (MLI). MVLF also
operates in accordance with Permit 35-017064 renewed by the SLCoHD on January 1. 2009 and
Conditional Use Permit #410-561 approved by the Salt Lake City Planning Commission on November 21,
2002.

2.1 Description
The landfill site consists of approximately 76 acres. MVLF is shown on the vicinity map included in this
report as Figure 2. The landfill encompasses parcel #14-10-300-011, which is owned by MLI. The legal
property description is:

Beginning at a point on the north line of California Avenue (1300 South Street) said point being North
00o20’02” East 33.00 feet along quarter section line from the South quarter corner of Section 10, Township
1 South, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base & Meridian and running thence North 00 o20’02” East 1293.12 feet
along said quarter Section line to quarter quarter Section line; Thence North 89o53’54” West 2596.31 feet
along quarter quarter Section line to the East line of 7200 West Street; Thence South 00o40’16” West
1269.78 feet along said East line; Thence South 44o37’52” East 35.17 feet to said North line; Thence South
89o56’00” East 2578.93 feet to the point of beginning.

Less and excepting the 100’ wide Kennecott right of way described as follows:

Beginning at a point on the East line of 7200 West Street, said point being North 00o40’16” East 1327.81
feet along Section line to quarter quarter Section line and South 89o53’54” East 55.00 feet along said quarter
quarter section line and South 00o40’16” West 9.28 feet along said East line from the Southwest corner of
Section 10, Township 1 South, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and running thence South
00o40’16” West 101.49 feet along said East line; Thence North 80o50’46” East 688.67 feet to said quarter
quarter Section line; Thence North 89o53’43” West 621.74 feet along said quarter quarter Section line;
thence South 80o50’46” West 57.71 to the point of beginning

Contains: 73.370 acres (3,326,687 square feet) net of the 100’ wide Kennecott right of way

The ultimate landfill footprint will cover the entire site minus 10-foot setbacks on the north and east sides
and 30-foot setbacks for perimeter landscaping (plus additional space for permanent facilities) on the south
and west sides. The landfill property is described as the South ½ of the Southwest ¼ of Section 10,
Township 1 South, Range 2 West, in Salt Lake County, Utah. The landfill has been in operation since April
1985.

2.2 Soil Conditions
MVLF is located immediately west of the Salt Lake Valley Solid Waste Management Facility (SLVSWMF)
Landfill. MVLF’s engineering consultant EMCON/OWT, Inc. (EMCON) previously performed an
extensive investigation of subsurface conditions at the SLVSWMF. Because of the proximity of the sites
and consistency of local subsurface conditions, it was EMCON’s opinion in the 1998 Design and Operation
Plan that subsurface conditions at SLVSWMF are similar to subsurface conditions at MVLF. EMCON’s
previous work at SLVSWMF is documented in Salt Lake Valley Landfill Master Plan (EMCON, November
1991), which has been submitted to both the SLCoHD and UDEQ.

Based on EMCON’s previous work at the SLVSWMF, soils in the area are generally Holocene and
Quaternary basin-fill deposits of the Jordan Valley consisting primarily of interbedded silty clays and silty
sands. The sediments were deposited on the shore of an ancient lake in the area where streams flowed into
3
the lake from the adjacent mountains. Saturated portions of these fluvio-lacustrine sediments are reported
to be between approximately 200 to 700 feet thick.

Generally, there are three principal soil horizons beneath the site area, consisting of: 1) surface fine-grained
layer; 2) intermediate silty sand horizon, and 3) lower sandy layer. The intermediate silty sand layer and
lower sand layer are commonly separated by a clay horizon. The surface fine-grained layer, consisting of
silt to clay soils, averages approximately 10 feet thick in the site area. The surface clay layer is punctuated
locally by thin stringers of silty and clayey sand. These thin sand and silt stringers are locally saturated
producing little water. Below the surface fine-grained layer, the intermediate horizon and lower sand layers
consist of variably well-graded, silty and poorly graded sands, and gravel and gravely sands at depths from
about 3 feet to about 30 feet below the ground surface. These shallow sands are typically water-saturated
and form the principal shallow aquifer beneath the site. Groundwater beneath the site is brackish with total
dissolved solids in the range of 5,100-32,000 milligrams per liter.

Shallow soil samples were obtained from undeveloped areas of the MVLF to obtain more information on
the site-specific subgrade conditions. Samples were also analyzed for ion-exchange capacity, pH, and
metals content, consistent with SLCoHD Regulations #1, Section 6.3(f). Testing confirmed that subgrade
soils are generally silty clays with some clayey sands. Test results are summarized in Table 1 with data
sheets included in Appendix B.

Permeability and consolidation testing was also conducted on relatively undisturbed samples. The
permeability of near surface soils, based on one sample, is 3.7 x 10-7 centimeters per second (cm/s), which
is generally consistent with permeability test results for clay soils at the SLVSWMF. The compression
index (Cc) was estimated to be 0.13 with a preconsolidation pressure of 9 kips per square foot. The values
for Cc correspond well to data from the neighboring SLVSWMF and empirical equations based on Atterberg
limits. Assuming a 10-foot-thick compressible clay layer beneath the landfill and relatively incompressible
sand beneath that, estimated average foundation settlements due to maximum fill thickness is less than 6
inches and has been neglected in landfill capacity calculations.

2.3 Hydrogeologic Setting
Information on the hydrogeologic setting of MVLF, summarized from the 2005 Annual Ground Water
Monitoring Report and 1998 Design and Operations Plan (Plan), is as follows:

Soils in the area are generally Holocene and Quaternary basin-fill deposits of the Jordan Valley,
consisting primarily of interbedded silty clays and silty sands. Three principal soil horizons occur
beneath the site: 1) a surface fine-grained layer; 2) an intermediate silty sand layer; and 3) a lower
sandy layer. The intermediate silty sand layer and lower sand layer usually are separated by a clay
horizon.

The surface fine-grained layer, consisting of silt and clay, averages approximately 10 feet thick in
the site area. The layer locally contains thin stringers of silty and clayey sand, which are locally
saturated but produce little water.

The intermediate silty sand layer and lower sand layer consist of ‘variably well-graded, silty and
poorly-graded sands, and gravel and gravely sands, ‘at depths between three and 30 feet below
ground surface (bgs). These shallow sands typically are water-saturated and form the principal
shallow aquifer beneath the site.

Shallow groundwater occurs at an approximate average of 10 feet bgs as shown on Figure 3 from the 2023
Groundwater Monitoring Report. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) concentrations typically are elevated, with
concentrations in area wells of 11,000-32,000 milligrams per liter (mg/l).

4
Groundwater gradients are very low beneath the MVLF, and flow direction can vary as a result of
construction activities in the area. The Plan indicates that during earlier years of MVLF operation,
groundwater flowed to the north, toward the Great Salt Lake. Following construction of borrow ponds
adjacent to and southeast of the MVLF, groundwater flow direction changed to southward. Construction
activities including ponds, stockpiling, and drainage ditches continue to influence local groundwater flow
direction.

Groundwater level maps for 1996, 1997, and 1998 indicate flow toward the south-southwest. Maps
prepared after 1998 indicate flow toward the south-southeast. The change in flow direction from southwest
to southeast after 1998 was attributed to construction of a drainage ditch to the east of the MVLF. The
drainage ditch located east of MVLF appears to discharge into Lee Ditch, which is southeast of the MVLF.
Lee Ditch appears to have been excavated to a depth comparable to the groundwater levels in MVLF wells,
thereby intersecting the groundwater surface and, by allowing groundwater discharge, causing groundwater
to flow eastward beneath MVLF toward the ditch. Ditch construction activity reportedly was completed
before the 2000 monitoring. The most recent groundwater level map from October 2023 indicates flow
towards the west.

Mountainview Landfill has five monitoring wells and a private water well which provides water for
landfill operations (equipment cleaning, domestic use, etc.) and dust control. There are two other private
wells within 2,000 feet of the Facility’s property line located at Construction Waste Management (CWM)
and SLVSWMF. Both wells are utilized for dust control at their respective facilities. Well logs can be
found in Appendix C. Additionally, water rights owners within 2,000 feet of Mountainview include the
Facility itself, CWM and SLVSWMF.
5
3 DESIGN

The following sections discuss the final grading plan, final cover design, and provisions for drainage.

3.1 Grading

The landfill site is relatively flat with elevations ranging from about 4,215 to 4,220 feet above mean sea
level (MSL) as seen in Figure 4. As discussed in Section 2.2, the near-surface soil has a permeability of
about 4 x 10-7 cm/s. Permeability of native clayey soils at the nearby SLVSWMF are on the order of 10-7
to 10-8 cm/s.

No excavation occurs before waste is placed in the landfill. Wastes are placed on the native low-
permeability soils. The native low-permeability soils serve as a low-permeability liner below the waste.
Although the native low-permeability soils beneath the site would impede the downward movement of
leachate within the existing landfill, no leachate has been detected.

A liner and leachate collection system will not be utilized, as these are not required for facilities restricted
to receipt of inert waste, including construction and demolition waste and asbestos waste. Additionally, the
native, low-permeability soils beneath the landfill serve as a natural low-permeability liner and provide
waste containment.

The landfill footprint covers most of the permitted 76-acre site. As shown on Drawing 1, the landfill
footprint covers approximately 74 acres. The footprint is set back 10 feet along the north and east boundaries
and 30 feet along the south and west boundaries. The proposed final elevation is 4,425 feet MSL. The
original design of the landfill included a minimum 50-foot-wide top deck with a minimum slope of 5
percent. The design included 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) sideslopes with 25-foot-wide benches every 40
vertical feet on the north and west sides of the landfill. The approved design Drawing 1.

MVLF has a total permitted design capacity of approximately 11.4 million bulk cubic yards (bcy). As of
the most recent aerial topographic survey presented completed February 24, 2024, the site has a total
remaining airspace of 686,653 cubic yards (cy). This airspace includes waste and daily/intermediate soil
cover, but does not include a projected 218,000 bcy of final cover materials. Based on incoming waste
projections ranging from 60,500 to 64,000 tons per year, and a compaction factor of 0.846 t/cy, the landfill
has a remaining life of approximately 9 years.

3.2 Final Cover Design
3.2.1 Regulatory Requirements

Regulations applicable to the MVLF final cover system are contained in UDEQ Solid
Waste Permitting and Management Rules (R315-301 through 320) and the SLCoHD’s
Health Regulations #1, Solid Waste Management Facilities.

UDEQ Rule R315-302-3(2) requires that a landfill be closed in manner that:

(a) minimizes the need for further maintenance;
(b) minimizes or eliminates threats to human health and the environment from post-
closure escape of solid waste constituents, leachate, landfill gases, contaminated run-
off or waste decomposition products to the ground, ground water, surface water, or the
atmosphere; and
(c) prepares the facility or unit for the post-closure period.

6
The final cover design has been approved as part of both the existing Class V and Class VI
permits. The landfill will continue to comply with UDEQ Rule R315-303-3(4) which
requires a landfill such as MVLF to be closed by leveling the wastes to the extent
practicable and placing a minimum of two feet of soil cover, including six inches of topsoil.
The landfill cover may be seeded with grass, other shallow rooted vegetation or other native
vegetation or covered in another manner approved by the Executive Director.

SLCoHD Regulations #1 requires a landfill to have a final cover consisting of a compacted
layer of cover material, at least 24 inches thick, with the upper 6 inches of a soil
composition suitable to sustain plant growth, and the lower portion of material that restricts
infiltration to the equivalent of that achieved by 18 inches of low-permeability (1 x 10-5
cm/sec or less) soil.
3.2.2 Final Cover
The approved final cover consists of a two-foot-thick layer of soil that is an evaporative
soil cover. These covers provide sufficient moisture storage so that the soil moisture can
be removed by evaporation and transpiration. Evaporative covers have been designed and
constructed on many landfills in arid and semi-arid regions and effectively reduce
infiltration without long-term performance concerns that may be associated with
geosynthetic materials or compacted clay covers.

The evaporative cover is designed to store moisture and allow for eventual evaporation and
plant transpiration. Little moisture is released to flow into the waste and subgrade soils.
The semi-arid conditions of Salt Lake City, where evaporation well exceeds precipitation,
are well suited for evaporative covers. Note that the landfill is currently in operation with
a partial final cover, and groundwater monitoring has not identified groundwater impacts.
In addition to allowing less infiltration, the evaporative cover is much less susceptible to
settlement and cracking than a compacted clay cover.

3.3 Drainage
3.3.1 Existing Site Conditions
The area immediately east of the site is the Salt Lake Valley Landfill. North of the site is a
wedge-shaped open area bounded by the northern landfill limits and an earth mound
(abandoned railroad) traversing diagonally beginning at the northwest corner of the
property. This open area creates additional contributory flow along the northern perimeter
of the site. Drainage tributary to the south is minimal due to an existing ditch alongside
West California Ave. West of the site is 7200 West and Lee Ditch where most of the site
surface runoff will drain.
3.3.2 Design Criteria
The design criteria utilized for determining the surface water runoff is based on the 25-
year, 24-hour duration storm event, as required by SLCoHD. The proposed drainage
system design is based on the final landfill grades shown on Drawing 1.
3.3.3 Hydrologic Analysis
The method used for determining storm runoff is based on Technical Release 55 (TR-55),
Urban Hydrology for Small Watershed, published by the Natural Resource Conservation
Service (NRCS). Runoff peak flows and storm hydrographs obtained from the hydrologic
analysis are based on 25-year, 24-hour frequency storm event and presented in Appendix
D.

7
Precipitation. Rainfall data from the nearest precipitation station (National Weather
Service-Salt Lake City Station [SLCS] was used to simulate the storm event at the site.
The estimated 25-year, 24-hour precipitation reported from the SLCS is 2.65 inches.

Rainfall Distribution. TR-55 includes four synthetic 24-hour rainfall distributions
developed by the NRCS representing various regions of the United States. Based on the
geographical location of the site, Type II rainfall distribution was used in the analysis.

Time of Concentration. The time of concentration (Tc) is the time for runoff to travel
from the most hydraulically distant point in a drainage subarea to the collection point.
Calculation for Tc consists of overland flow or sheet flow, shallow concentrated flow, and
open channel flow, or some combination, to the collection point. The T c calculated for the
landfill drainage subareas range from 6 to 8 minutes, approximately 0.1 hour, which is the
minimum time concentration allowed by the TR-55 methodology. Open channel flow time
is calculated based on flow velocities obtained from Manning’s equation.

Overland flow time is determined based on the kinematics equation for sheet flow
condition. Travel times for shallow concentrated and open channel flows were calculated
based on flow velocities obtained from Manning’s equation. Data input for the TR-55
computer analysis are presented in the hydrology calculations.

An approximate Tc for the off-site drainage area was developed based on the topographic
features on the US Geological Survey (USGS) map and open channel flow time along the
northern perimeter of the site.

Hydrologic Soil Group. Selection of runoff curve numbers (CNs) are based on the
hydrologic soil classification, cover type, hydrologic conditions, and antecedent moisture
condition. The soils at the site are predominately silty clay loam classified as Type C in the
NRCS soil group system. Based on available soil information and land use, the CN values
used for the analysis are as follows:

3.3.4 Drainage Improvements
Calculations shown in Appendix D support the following drainage structures. The
proposed bench and downdrain systems are designed to handle peak flows (25-year, 24-
hour event) for the final closure condition. Benches and downdrains have been
conservatively designed assuming that run-off is not conveyed into intermediated
downdrains and is directed into downdrains on the western slope. Downdrains on the north
and south slopes will actually convey some of the flow and convey water to the perimeter
and natural drainage courses. Final improvements are shown on the drainage plan in
Appendix D. Calculations included in Appendix D support the following improvements.

Grass-lined Benches. Most of the flow will be collected from side slopes and conveyed
via benches. Drop inlets along the benches will be used to convey surface flow to
downdrain pipes.

Area Description CN
Landfill Top Deck 86
Landfill Side Slope 88
Perimeter / Access Road 90
Undeveloped Area 79
8
Downdrains. The downdrain system is designed to provide hydraulic capacity of
intercepted run-off carried on the bench system. Drop inlets are included as part of the
downdrain system. The high velocity flow (average of 30 fps) will be migrated through
energy dissipaters or equivalent materials at the bottom of downdrains to minimize erosion.

Perimeter Drainage. Water will be conveyed to the perimeter of the site and into natural
drainage courses. The perimeter drainage system will carry some of the run-off and control
run-on.

Culverts. Culverts have been constructed to convey water under 7200 West and California
Avenue South to Lee Ditch. Flared end sections will intercept flow from ditches and
downdrains. The site’s point of discharge is the existing Lee Ditch.

3.4 Sequencing
The February 24, 2024 vs Final Waste Grade, Drawing 3, presents areas of the facility remaining to be
filled. The isopach contour lines on the drawing represent thickness of waste mass remaining to achieve the
final landfill grades. The Plan provides operational guidance as to where additional waste should be placed,
the sequence in which it should be placed, and provides information on how access and drainage structures
must be implemented during fill placement. Asbestos waste will be sequenced within the new footprint
depicted in Figure 5. Asbestos disposal will follow guidelines outlined in 4.15 of this document.

Current Active Area. Drawing 3 also delineates areas on the North, West, South and East sides of the
facility which have reached final grade and have received final cover. The capped area encompasses
approximately 13.1 acres on the first and second benches of the facility. The drawing also delineates an
area on the west and north-facing slopes that have reached final grade and have not received final cover.
Waste placement on the remaining benches occurs in an area fill manner. Sequencing of waste placement
(C&D and Asbestos) is based on operational needs considering volumes, access, drainage, and grading.

Landfilling and final grading is currently ongoing in the remaining areas of the facility. The entire permitted
footprint of the landfill currently contains waste, so the remaining fill placement and sequence is
accomplished to complete the upper benches according to the approved final grading plan.

The worst-case closure costs in 2023 are based on a 63-acre area. This includes the entire waste footprint
of the facility with the exception of the area that has completed and approved final cap.

Soil Cover. Cover will consist of a total of two feet of soil. This material will be taken from on-site
stockpiles of clean fill or if necessary, purchased from outside sources. Suitable soils (CL or SC) for the
final cover will be determined from test parameters established. A quality assurance plan will be prepared
to follow for cap construction. A final construction report for each segment of final cover completed will
be submitted to the UDEQ and SLCoHD.

9
3.5 Anticipated Service Life

The landfill design includes a total landfill air space (waste and daily/intermediate cover) of approximately
11.4 million bcy. As of the most recent aerial topographic survey (Figure 6), completed on February 24,
2024, the site has a total remaining airspace of 686,653 cy. This airspace includes waste and
daily/intermediate soil cover, but does not include a projected 218,000 bcy of final cover materials. Based
on incoming waste projections ranging from 60,500 to 64,000 tons per year, and a compaction factor of
0.846 t/cy, the landfill has a remaining life of approximately 9 years. However, because C&D tonnage is
currently substantially lower than the projections stated above, the remaining life of the facility may
increase substantially.

The landfill’s asbestos disposal area was originally permitted to consume 50,000 cubic yards of landfill
capacity. Subsequently, the top surface of the landfill was raised in 2019, thus increasing the capacity to
111,000 cubic yards. With the increased asbestos disposal area, airspace capacity is 433,170 cubic yards,
not including projected final cover.

Ongoing engineering reviews will be conducted to continue to monitor the remaining service life.
10
4 OPERATIONS PLAN

This operations plan has been prepared in fulfillment of UDEQ regulations and general conformance with
SLCHD Health Regulations #1 Solid Waste Management Facilities.

4.1 Waste Acceptance
MVLF is currently operated as a construction and demolition waste disposal site (UDEQ Class VI) and
asbestos disposal site (UDEQ Class V). The current hours of operation are 7:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., Monday
through Friday. Hours of operation may change to accommodate customer projects, seasonally, or for other
reasons. Relevant hours are posted at the site entrance.

MVLF accepts, under current permits, only those wastes allowed by the SLCoHD/UDEQ Regulations.
Acceptable wastes consist of solid waste resulting from construction, remodeling, repair and demolition of
structures, from road building and land clearing, and regulated asbestos containing material, as defined by
UAC R315-301-2(5). Such wastes include, but are not limited to, bricks, concrete and other masonry
materials, soil, rock, wall coverings, gypsum board, plaster, drywall, and other inert material, plumbing
fixtures, non-asbestos insulation, roofing shingles, flooring tiles, vinyl flooring, asphaltic pavement, glass,
plastics that are not sealed in a way that conceals other wastes, wood, and metals that are incidental to any
of the above. Solid wastes that are not construction and demolition waste (even if resulting from the
construction, remodeling, repair and demolition of structures, and from road building and land clearing),
and which will not be accepted, include, but are not limited to, municipal solid waste, medical waste,
putrescible waste, florescent electrical fixtures and transformers containing polychlorinated biphenyls, tires
(although tires inadvertent to a load, or tire chips of 2-inch size or less, are considered acceptable), drums
and containers with liquid or unrecognizable wastes, and fuel tanks. Specifically excl uded from the
definition of construction and demolition waste is solid waste that has been rendered unrecognizable by a
process such as pulverizing or shredding or other similar process. No liquid, hazardous, or municipal solid
waste (putrescible waste) will be accepted, as defined by SLCoHD.

Asbestos waste acceptance criteria will be based on the procedures described in Section 4.15 of this
document. The Class V facility accepts asbestos containing material. Solid wastes that are not accepted
include, but are not limited to, municipal solid waste, medical waste, putrescible waste, fluorescent
electrical fixtures and transformers containing polychlorinated biphenyls, tires, drums, and containers with
liquid or unrecognizable wastes, and fuel tanks.

The general service area for the landfill is the Salt Lake City -County metropolitan area. The landfill also
receives waste occasionally from Davis, Utah, Weber, and Tooele counties. The population of the service
area exceeds 1 million people. As the facility has been in operation since 1984 and there are no changes to
the facility’s Operations Plan, a traffic impact study is not included.

4.2 Landfill Equipment
Landfill operations will be managed with the use of heavy construction equipment which currently
includes the following:
1) Bulldozer
2) Compactor
3) Rubber Tire Loader
4) Track Hoe
5) Water Truck

In the event of equipment breakdown, or operational changes, other equipment may be used to manage
disposal of wastes.

11

Equipment on site will be provided with the following safety devices:
1) Rollover protection devices
2) Seat belts
3) Audible reverse warning devices
4) Fire Extinguishers on all equipment used to manage solid waste or fill cover material
5) Communication equipment

Adequate equipment will be maintained to ensure availability for proper management of the waste
material and compliance with SLCoHD Section 4.1.4(ii)(h).

4.3 Landfill Personnel
The number of site personnel will be adequate to ensure proper operations and management of the landfill.
In addition, a member of management will be available during all hours of operation to handle emergency
situations with facility communications equipment. Landfill Personnel include the following:

Landfill District Manager
6976 West California Avenue
Salt Lake City, Utah 84104
[phone]

Operations manager/supervisor
Equipment operators
Gatehouse personnel

Laborers, mechanics, and related support personnel will be provided as needed. Current operations require
a staff of about four full-time employees during any given work shift. All employees will be required to
wear the following at all times in the active areas on site:
1) Hard hat
2) Gloves
3) Safety glasses
4) Safety footwear (steel toe and steel shank)
5) Safety vests

4.4 Training
MVLF utilizes internal as well as external training opportunities, and conducts on-the-job training for new
employees, and recurring training to refresh existing employees. Training is conducted on landfill operating
procedures, equipment operations, identification and inspection of acceptable and unacceptable wastes,
health and safety training, record keeping and reporting, and in related areas. A safety specialist assists in
maintaining an updated Site Safety Manual and in instructing employees in the manual’s procedures, use
of personal safety devices, and use of the protective features of equipment. Equipment operators are
especially trained in fire protection, and the use of fire extinguishers, which are mounted on each piece of
equipment. Employees are trained on all equipment that they are expected to use in the performance of their
jobs. The goal of employee training is to ensure proper and safe operations for employees, and the public
users of the site.

4.5 Signage
The landfill entrance gate area has existing signs that indicate the name, permit number, hours of use,
penalty for unauthorized use, safety precautions, types of waste accepted and not accepted, and additional
12
information. Signs are used as needed to direct traffic onto roads, control vehicle speed within the landfill,
and to indicate unloading areas.
The asbestos disposal area is to be screened by fencing or berms and posted with warning signs on all four
sides. The wording “CAUTION ASBESTOS WASTE” or similar wording is printed on the signs with
lettering at least three inches high.

4.6 Waste Inspection Procedures
When vehicles loaded with waste materials arrive at the gate, they must stop at the gatehouse. The gatehouse
attendant is trained in waste acceptance procedures. Through a series of questions, the gatehouse attendant
determines the nature and general source of the waste materials. A video camera is mounted outside the
gatehouse, positioned to allow the attendant to observe the load. A waste receipt ticket is filled out that
identifies the account’s name, time and date, load description, and the origin of the waste. This form is
included in Appendix E. Acceptable loads are directed to appropriate unloading areas.

If the load is deemed unacceptable, it is rejected, and not allowed to proceed into the landfill. A “Load
Rejection Report”, included in Appendix E, is completed by the landfill, and provided to SLCoHD for
regulatory notification.

Loads accepted for disposal are again viewed/inspected by the Traffic Directors/Laborers and/or equipment
operators, as the waste is unloaded/or managed at the disposal area. Any unacceptable wastes will be
required to be reloaded by the driver and removed from the site. If unacceptable wastes are later identified
by site personnel, it will be removed from the working area and the disposer will be notified to remove
them from the site. If the source of the waste cannot be identified, MVLF will be responsible for disposing
of the waste at a properly permitted site.

Random load inspections will be conducted at a minimum frequency of 1% of loads received, but not less
than once per week to ensure that waste haulers remain cognizant of the types of unacceptable wastes, and
to enforce the unacceptable waste regulations. All “suspicious” loads will be inspected. In addition,
equipment operators constantly look for suspicious or excluded wastes as they operate the site. A load
inspection program is included in Appendix E.

Asbestos loads accepted for disposal are handled in accordance with 4.15.6 of this document and are
inspected again by the equipment operators at the working face.

4.7 Disposal Procedures and Contingency Plans for Fire or Explosion
The area fill method of disposal is used at MVLF. The landfill will be developed in stages. Daily disposal
areas will be kept to the minimum area required to allow safe unloading, while minimizing the area of
uncovered waste. Landfill equipment will be used to push, spread, and compact the waste, and to maintain
an orderly working area. Scavenging is prohibited by any person(s).

Verification of grades and elevations will be performed by certified surveyors on an as-needed basis.
Typically, this occurs once a year when an annual aerial-based topographic map is prepared. Daily grade
tracking is accomplished through Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) devices that are either mobile, or
mounted on equipment as appropriate.

No open burning will be conducted at any time. If a fire should ignite or explosion occurs, soil from
designated stockpiles or other areas maintained near the disposal area will be used to cover any burning
waste. The water truck may be used to spray water on the fire as necessary. While site personnel are
responding to the fire, emergency response agencies such as the fire department will be called in to assist
as needed.

13
4.8 Surface Water Management
Run-on and run-off will be controlled through use of berms, ditches, and erosion control efforts. Lee Ditch
and Kersey Creek are the nearest surface water bodies, and both feed the Great Salt Lake. The active portion
of the landfill is maintained at a higher grade than surrounding areas and soil berms are constructed as
necessary to direct surface water from the active portion of the landfill. The soil berms and grading
techniques employed effectively isolate a portion of the landfill where waste may be exposed.

Surface water run-off from the facility is collected in a series of trenches constructed around the perimeter
of the facility. These trenches convey surface water to unnamed surface water control ditches and Lee Creek
located north and west of the property.

MVLF manages stormwater consistent with the requirements of the General Industrial stormwater
Discharge Permit. As required, a stormwater pollution prevention plan and stormwater monitoring plan
have been prepared for MVLF.

The limits of landfill are outside the 100-year flood plan as shown on Figure 7 available from Salt Lake
County FEMA Database. The limits of landfill are also outside wetlands as depicted on Figure 8 from the
National Wetlands Inventory Database.

4.9 Litter, Odor, Vector, and Dust Control
Temporary litter fencing will be deployed as needed to contain blowing paper and plastics. Litter will be
cleaned up by laborers as needed to maintain a safe and orderly appearance. Prevailing winds are from the
southwest.

Odors are not expected, due to the inert nature of the waste. Placement of cover soil over certain types of
waste also will act to control any odors. Disease vectors, rats, or flies are not expected to be an issue, due
to the inert nature of waste.

Dust will be controlled by watering. Water is pumped into the water truck from an onsite water well. If no
water is available from the well an off-site water source will be used. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan reviewed
by UDEQ is included in Appendix A-4.

4.10 Noise Levels
All on-site equipment is equipped with mufflers. Noise levels will be minimized to prevent levels beyond
the property line exceeding allowable limits set forth in the SLCoHD Regulation #1.

4.11 Explosive Gas Monitoring
Although C&D waste disposal sites generally do not generate significant amounts of explosive gas (landfill
gas), a monitoring program will continue to be conducted. The monitoring program is in place to ensure
that landfill gas, measured as methane, generated by the waste does not create a hazardous condition.
Landfill personnel have been trained in the use and calibration of a methane detector for monitoring the
surface of the landfill. Gas monitoring at MVLF was started in March 1997 and is performed quarterly by
landfill personnel or a qualified consultant. The methane detector is recalibrated every quarter before
monitoring and a minimum of two locations approximately thirty feet up the landfill slope, various locations
at the top of landfill, the site buildings, and the corners of the fill are selected for monitoring each quarter.
The results of the monitoring program are recorded on a Methane Monitoring Form and are kept on site.

If gas levels do exceed 25 percent of the lower explosive limit (LEL) within any structure or the LEL at the
landfill’s property line, MVLF shall:

14
1) Immediately take necessary steps to ensure the immediate protection of human health and
safety.
2) Immediately notify the SLCoHD of the gas levels detected and the remediation steps which
have already been taken.
3) Within 14 days, submit to the SLCoHD for approval an ongoing remediation plan for the
gas accumulation. The plan will describe the nature and extent of the problem and the
proposed remedy. The plan will be implemented upon approval of the SLCoHD.

4.12 Groundwater Monitoring
Groundwater from five on-site monitoring wells is sampled annually and analyzed by a Utah Certified
Laboratory. Groundwater monitoring since 1985 has not indicated any impact to groundwater from the
disposal of waste at this site.

A Groundwater Monitoring Plan, dated August 2001, presents the groundwater monitoring program for
MVLF. This plan incorporates monitoring elements approved by SLCoHD to provide environmental
protection during and after development. The plan further uses monitoring locations selected on the basis
of hydrogeologic conditions to provide early detection of a potential release from the facility and corrective
action programs to be initiated if groundwater is contaminated. Statistical analysis is performed in
DUMPStat, according to an intra-well Shewhart-CUSUM Control Chart statistical methodology described
in the groundwater monitoring plan found in Appendix F. This procedure compares the latest collected
results to a control limit and a CUSUM limit for their own history, which eliminates uncertainty caused by
natural variation among the wells.

4.13 Spill Prevention
A spill prevention control and countermeasure plan has been prepared for MVLF.

4.14 Recordkeeping Procedures
The MVLF will continue to maintain a site Operating Record that will be available for inspection by the
SLCoHD and UDEQ. The operating record will include at least the following information:

 Amounts and types of waste accepted at the facility,
 Unacceptable waste notifications,
 Random load inspections,
 Survey information regarding the filled areas of the landfill,
 Groundwater and gas monitoring results,
 Training procedures and documentation of training, and
 Site Facility Inspections.

4.15 Special Operating Requirements for Asbestos Containing Materials

The site will operate in accordance with the SLVHD, UDEQ and USEPA requirements.
4.15.1 Additional Operating Record Requirement.
In accordance with SLVHD regulations, MVLF will keep an additional operating record
containing the identity of persons who have disposed asbestos waste at the landfill and
the amount of asbestos waste each person has disposed at the landfill. The documentation
will consist copy of the non-hazardous waste manifest or Waste Shipment Record in
accordance with 40 CFR 61.154 (e)(1).
15
4.15.2 Asbestos Waste Separation From Existing Solid Waste
In areas adjacent to the asbestos disposal boundary, asbestos waste cells will not be
located directly on top of existing solid waste. Prior to placing ACM over any area
containing only C&D solid waste, the area will receive 2 feet of clean soil consistent with
final cover. Conversely, prior to placing only C&D solid waste over ACM, the area will
receive 2 feet of clean soil. In areas where C&D disposal is co-mingled with ACM, the
entire working area will be handled and covered as ACM.
4.15.3 Location Mapping Requirement
In accordance with SLCoHD regulations, MVLF will provide to the SLCoHD, and keep
on file, a plat map showing the exact location of all asbestos disposal areas.
4.15.4 Handling
Regulated asbestos-containing material to be disposed of at MVLF shall be handled,
transported, and disposed in a manner that will not permit the release of asbestos fibers into
the air and must otherwise comply with Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 61,
Section 154.
4.15.5 Material and Containerizing Requirements
MVLF does not accept regulated asbestos-containing material unless the waste has been
adequately wetted and containerized to meet UDEQ and SLCoHD regulations including:

a. Regulated asbestos-containing material is adequately wetted when its moisture
content prevents fiber release.
b. Regulated asbestos-containing material is properly containerized when it is
placed in double plastic bags of 6-mil or thicker, sealed in such a way to be
leak-proof and air-tight, and the amount of void space or air in the bags is
minimized. Regulated asbestos-containing material slurries must be packaged
in leak-proof and air-tight rigid containers if such slurries are too heavy for the
plastic bag containers. Upon submittal of a request, including documentation
demonstrating safety, the Executive Secretary may authorize other proper
methods of containment which may include double bagging, plastic-lined
cardboard containers, plastic-lined metal containers, or the use of vacuum
trucks for the transport of slurry.
c. MVLF requires that all containers holding regulated asbestos-containing
material be labeled with the name of the waste generator, the location where
the waste was generated, and tagged with a warning label indicating that the
containers hold regulated asbestos-containing material.
4.15.6 Disposal Standards.
MVLF applies the following standards to the disposal of Regulated Asbestos-Containing
Material;
a. Upon entering the disposal site, the transporter of the regulated asbestos-
containing material must notify the scalehouse operator that the load contains
regulated asbestos-containing material by presenting the waste shipment
record. MVLF will verify quantities received, sign off on the waste shipment
record, and send a copy of the waste shipment record to the generator within
30 days.
b. Upon receipt of the regulated asbestos-containing material, the MVLF inspects
the loads to verify that the regulated asbestos-containing material is properly
contained in leak-proof containers and labeled appropriately. MVLF will
notify the Salt Lake Valley Health Department and the Utah Department of
16
Environmental Quality Executive Secretary if it is believed that the regulated
asbestos-containing material is in a condition that may cause fiber release
during disposal. If the wastes are not properly containerized, and the load is
accepted, MVLF will thoroughly soak the regulated asbestos-containing
material with a water spray prior to unloading, rinse out the truck, and
immediately cover the regulated asbestos-containing material with material
which prevents fiber release prior to compacting the regulated asbestos-
containing material in the landfill.
c. During deposition and covering of the regulated asbestos-containing material,
MVLF will:
i. Prepare an area of the landfill to receive the regulated asbestos-
containing material.
ii. Assure asbestos waste is unloaded in a way that minimizes breaking of
containers or bags. As necessary, MVLF may require the ACM hauler to
notify the facility of the time and date the asbestos waste will be
transported and the volume of asbestos to be disposed so that the facility
operator can oversee the unloading.
iii. Within 18 hours or at the end of the operating day, completely cover the
containerized regulated asbestos-containing material with sufficient care
to avoid breaking the containers with a minimum of six inches of material
containing no regulated asbestos-containing material. If the regulated
asbestos-containing material is improperly containerized, it will be
completely covered immediately with six inches of material containing no
regulated asbestos-containing material; and
iv. Cover all ACM daily with a cover material using material such as soil that
is free of asbestos, debris or other objects that may puncture the asbestos
containing bags or containers. Asbestos will be covered with two feet (61
centimeters) of cover material if equipment will be driven over the
disposal area, or six inches (15.2 centimeters) of cover material if
equipment will not be driven over the disposal area.
d. MVLF will provide barriers adequate to control public access. MVLF will:
i. limit access to the regulated asbestos-containing material management site
to no more than two entrances by gates that can be locked when left
unattended and by fencing adequate to restrict access by the general
public; and;
ii. place warning signs at the entrances and at intervals no greater than 330
feet along the perimeter of the sections where regulated asbestos-
containing material is deposited that comply with the requirements of 40
CFR 61.154(b).

17

5 CLOSURE AND POST CLOSURE

This section describes the tasks involved for implementing closure and post-closure maintenance of MVLF.

5.1 Closure
This preliminary plan reviews sequencing cover design, grading, and discusses closure cost and financial
assurance.
5.1.1 Sequencing
The landfill will be closed at the end of the site life or in stages as portions reach final
grade. A Quality Assurance Plan for construction of final cover will be prepared. Upon
completion of each segment of final cover, a final construction report will be completed.
5.1.2 Cover Design
The approved final cover consists of a two-foot thick layer of soils. As discussed in Section
3.2, the approved cover meets the SLCoHD Health Regulations and the UDEQ Regulations
including:

 Minimizing further maintenance,
 Minimizing threats to human health and the environment by
minimizing infiltration, and
 Preparing the facility for post-closure period.

The final cover will be vegetated to minimize erosion and maximize evapotranspiration.
5.1.3 Grading
Final grades are 2:1 with 25-foot-wide benches every 40 vertical feet. The top of the landfill
is a 125-foot to 200-foot-wide deck with 2%-7.5% slopes for drainage. The final elevation
is about 4,425 feet MSL. Benches intercept surface water and generally slope to the west.
5.1.4 Drainage
Run-off is controlled by a system of drainage benches and downdrains as discussed in
Chapter 3. Drainage improvements include:

 Culverts to convey water to Lee Ditch

The system has been designed for peak flows from the 25-year, 24-hour storm.
5.1.5 Closure Costs
Financial assurance is based on a worst-case closure area. Worst-case closure costs include
two feet of cover soil, ditch and bench grading, and vegetation. The estimated worst-case
closure costs are summarized in Table 2. The costs include final features, such as
downdrains and culverts, shown on the Final Grading and Drainage Plan (Drawing 1).
5.1.6 Recording
Not later than 60 days after certification of closure, the owner will submit plats and a
statement of fact concerning the location of any disposal site to the county recorder to be
recorded as part of the record of title and submit proof of record of title filing to the
Director.

18

5.2 Post Closure Maintenance
The post closure maintenance plan describes the tasks necessary to implement the post closure
maintenance requirements. The plan includes:

 Monitoring and control systems operating during the post-closure maintenance period,
 Inspection and maintenance procedures for the closed landfill,
 Emergency response plan, and
 Estimated post-closure maintenance costs.
5.2.1 Final Cover Integrity
This program will involve making repairs to the cover as necessary to correct the effects
of settling, subsidence, erosion, and other events. A post closure maintenance program will
be instituted at the landfill to verify that the final cover retains its integrity. The final cover
areas will be routinely evaluated and inspected for:

 Evidence of erosion,
 Ponded water,
 Odor,
 Exposed refuse,
 Cracks,
 Settlement,
 Slope failure, and
 Leachate seeps.

Cracks in the final cover will be repaired. Any erosion damage, which may occur as a result
of extremely heavy rainfall, will be repaired. Temporary berms, ditches, and straw mulch
will be used as needed to prevent further erosion damage to soil cover areas until site
conditions permit replacement of eroded soil and reseeding of vegetation.
5.2.2 Drainage System
Drainage control problems can result in accelerated erosion of a particular area within the
landfill. Differential settling of drainage control structures can limit their usefulness and
may result in failure to direct storm water properly off the site.

A post closure maintenance program will be implemented so that the integrity of the final
drainage system is maintained throughout the post closure maintenance period. The final
drainage system will be routinely evaluated and inspected for ponding water, and blockage
of and damage to drainage structures. In areas where erosion problems are noted or
drainage control structures need to be repaired, proper maintenance procedures will be
implemented to prevent further damage.

Inspections and any maintenance will be conducted by landfill personnel.
5.2.3 Vegetative Cover
The condition of vegetation will be monitored annually. Inspections will identify areas of
irregular color or growth deficiency. During future inspections, the spread of these
conditions will be noted.
19
5.2.4 Groundwater Monitoring Network
The groundwater monitoring system will remain in service throughout the closure and post-
closure periods. Upon determination by local, state, and federal agencies that groundwater
monitoring is no longer necessary, the system will be decommissioned. The wells will be
decommissioned consistent with applicable local and state regulations.

Groundwater monitoring wells will be inspected for signs of failure or deterioration during
each sampling event. If damage is discovered, the nature and extent of the problem will be
recorded. A decision will be made to repair or replace the well. (Possible repairs include
redevelopment, chemical treatment, partial casing replacement or repair, resealing of the
annulus, or pumping and testing.) If a well needs to be replaced, it will be properly
decommissioned well destruction. Inspections and maintenance will be performed by
landfill personnel.
5.2.5 Post-Closure Cost Estimate
The post-closure maintenance cost estimate shown in Table 2 was prepared based on the
post-closure maintenance plan presented in this section. The post-closure maintenance cost
estimate includes the cost of materials, equipment, labor, and administration. The post-
closure maintenance costs are assumed to continue for at least 30 years after closure.
5.2.6 Post-Closure Care Period Contact
Contact the following individual about the facility during the post-closure care period:

Jose Flores, Jr. -- District Manager
6976 West California Avenue
Salt Lake City, Utah 84104
801-520-3529

20
REFERENCES

AquAeTer. December 2002. Groundwater Monitoring Report for Mountain View Landfill.

AquAeTer. August 2001. Groundwater Monitoring Plan for Mountain View Landfill.

EMCON Associates. June 11, 1998. Design and Operations Plan, Blandfill Landfill.

EMCON Associates. November 1991. Salt Lake Valley Master Plan. Prepared for Salt Lake Valley Waste
Management Council. Project 344-02.01.

Hansen, Allen & Luce, Inc. December 2023. Groundwater Monitoring Report, 2023 Annual Monitoring
Event, Mountain View Landfill. Project 290.02.112.

Hansen, Allen & Luce, Inc. August 2018. Mountain View Landfill – Final Grading Modification.

Natural Resource Conservation Service Technical Release 55. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds.

Mountain View Landfill. March 2009. Spill Prevention and Countermeasure Plan.

Mountain View Landfill. June 2009. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Permit UTR000533.

National Wetland Inventory. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (www.nwi.fws.gov)

Pipe Culvert analysis computer program. Version 1.7 Copyright © 1986. Dodson & Associates

Salt Lake County Engineering & Flood Control. (www.slco.org/pn/eng/flood/html/fplains.html)

Salt Lake County Health Department Regulations #1, Solid Waste Management Facilities.

Siegel, R.A.August 2001. Groundwater Monitoring Plan for Mountain View Landfill 1975. STABL User
Manual. Purdue University, Joint Highway Research Project JHRP-75-9

Utah Department of Environmental Quality Solid Waste Permitting and Management Rules, R315-301 to
320

TABLES

Table 1
Summary of Soils Laboratory Testing
Summary of Soils Laboratory Testing

Grain Size Atterberg Limits Compaction Test
(ASTM 1557) Permeability Test
Sample
Number
Dry
Inplace
Density
USCS
Classification
Moisture
Content
(%)
Percent
Passing
#4 (%)
Percent
Passing
#200 (%)
Liquid
Limit
(LL)
Plasticity
Limit
(PL)
Maximum
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Optimum
Moisture
Content
(%)
Remolding
Criteria
Coefficient of
Permeability
k (cm/sec)
a. Bucket 2 SC 22.5 80 48 27 18
b. Bucket 3 CL 28.1 96 84 38 20
c. Bucket 4 CL 30.3 100 96 44 22
d. Bucket SK1 SC 21.7 81 47 29 18
e. Bucket SK2 SC 16.6 77 44 28 17 124.0 9.5
f. Bucket SK3 CL 25.6 92 68 31 19
g. Bucket SK4 GC 19.0 64 32 27 17 127.3 7.8 90%RC@OMC+2 5.00E-06
h. Core #1 92.1 CL 28.3
i. Core #2 17.9
j. Core #3 89.7 CL or SC 28.3
k. Core #4 84.8 CL 33.9 3.70E-07
l. Sample #I 104.7 SC 17.8 83.8 46.6 26 18 116.7 13.5
m. Sample #2 102.6 CL 13.6 85.6 54.9 27 18 114.5 14
n. Sample #3 106.7 SC 14.1 81.3 46.0 25 17 118.7 12.5
NOTE:
Samples were sent to EMCON/OWT, Inc.’s Soil Lab. Samples a-k were sampled in March 1998 and samples l-n were sampled in November 2004.
Core samples have slightly higher moisture and are probably more accurate.
RC = relative compaction
OMC = optimum moisture content

Insert Table 2 pdf

Inflation Factor 1.07
Worst Case Exit Closure Cost
Description Units
Prior Year
Unit Cost
Updated
Unit Cost Quantity Prior Year Cost
(Based on Current Quantity)Updated Cost
Final Cap Construction – 50.2 Acres
Contractor Mob/demob EA $27,395.83 $29,313.54 1 $27,395.83 $29,313.54
24-inch Cover material
(purchase/place/compact)CY $6.85 $7.33 161979 $1,109,387.49 $1,187,044.61
Hydroseeding $684.90 $732.84 50.2 $34,381.77 $36,788.50
Grading – Ditches & Swales LF $17.12 $18.32 6400 $109,583.34 $117,254.17
Surveys LS $4,794.27 $5,129.87 1 $4,794.27 $5,129.87
QA/QC and soils testing ACRE $3,424.48 $3,664.19 50.2 $171,908.86 $183,942.48
Closure Report and Certification LS $13,697.92 $14,656.77 1 $13,697.92 $14,656.77
Deed/Records Filing EA $3,424.48 $3,664.19 1 $3,424.48 $3,664.19
Building/Facilities Demobilization EA $34,244.79 $36,641.93 1 $34,244.79 $36,641.93
Fencing and Site Security EA $6,848.96 $7,328.39 1 $6,848.96 $7,328.39
$1,621,764.46
Notes:
1. Worst case closure assumes 50.2 acres of final cap to build at closure or at an intermediate closure condition.
2. Final cap consists of 24-inches of CL or SC soils as determined by ASTM and seeded with native grass seed.
3. Soils for final cover obtained from on-site stockpiles.
Annual Post Closure Maintneance & Care Cost
Description Units
Prior Year
Unit Cost
Updated
Unit Cost
Annual
Quantity
Prior Year
Annual Cost Updated Cost
Site Maintenance
Misc. Grading and repair of final cap HR $169.91 $181.81 40 $6,796.55 $7,272.31
Reseeding and fertilizing of final cap ACRE $1,223.38 $1,309.02 1 $1,223.38 $1,309.02
Mowing and weed control ACRE $169.91 $181.81 63 $10,704.57 $11,453.89
Drainage repair/maintenance HR $169.91 $181.81 20 $3,398.28 $3,636.16
Miscellaneous maintenance HR $61.17 $65.45 20 $1,223.38 $1,309.02
Monitoring
Annual inspections & report HR $115.54 $123.63 40 $4,621.66 $4,945.17
Groundwater sampling HR $92.43 $98.90 40 $3,697.32 $3,956.14
Groundwater sample analyses EA $407.79 $436.34 7 $2,854.55 $3,054.37
Annual reporting HR $108.74 $116.36 20 $2,174.90 $2,327.14
Annual surface water sampling HR $81.56 $87.27 20 $1,631.17 $1,745.35
Surface water sample analyses EA $20.39 $21.82 4 $81.56 $87.27
Annual reporting HR $115.54 $123.63 20 $2,310.83 $2,472.59
Landfill gas monitoring HR $61.17 $65.45 24 $1,468.06 $1,570.82
$45,139.24
30
$1,354,177.18
Notes:
Total Required Financial Assurance Bond Amount = $2,975,941.64
1. Post-Closure assumes a 30-year post-closure period as required by Health Regulation 1, Section 6.9(f) on the completed landfill footprint of 63 acres.
30-Year Total Post-Closure Care & Maintenance Costs (inflation adjusted) =
2. A total of seven groundwater sample points (five wells, one field duplicate and one trip blank) are sampled annually for constituents listed in Mountain
View Landfill Groundwater Monitoring Plan dated August 2001.
3. Surface water monitoring occurs quarterly.
Post-Closure Care & Maintenance Period (Years) =
Mountain View Landfill
Worst Case Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance and Care
Financial Assurance Cost Estimate
October-23
Total Exit Closure Site Costs =
Initial Annual Post-Closure Care & Maintenance Costs =

FIGURES

Figure 1

Site Location Map

the
oup
mamOWT Solid Waste Stnkes J-
SCALE - Miles
/ \
DATE NOV, 2000
DWN .^JjjL_
APPR
REV ^
PROJECT NO
801569
FIGURE 1
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
MOUNTAIN VIEW LANDFILL
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
SITE LOCATION MAP

Figure 2

Vicinity Map

Figure 3

Groundwater Contour Map

Waste Management 5 Mountain View Landfill
Groundwater Monitoring Report

Figure 4

USGS Topo

FIGURE
4WASTE MANAGEMENT
MOUNTAINVIEW LANDFILL
¦
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
2024 CLASS V PERMIT MODIFICATION
Information
Property Boundary
Do
c
u
m
e
n
t

P
a
t
h
:

H
:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
9
0

-

W
a
s
t
e

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
\
2
0
2
3

M
o
u
n
t
a
i
n

V
i
e
w

C
l
a
s
s

V

P
e
r
m
i
t

M
o
d
\
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
\
G
I
S
\
M
V

2
0
2
4

P
e
r
m
i
t

M
o
d
\
M
V

2
0
2
4

P
e
r
m
i
t

M
o
d
.
a
p
r
x
Da
t
e
:

2
/
1
2
/
2
0
2
4
0 500 1,000250 Feet
NE Prevailing Winds
BASEMAP: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, MAGNA QUADRANGLE UTAH - SALT LAKE COUNTY - 7.5-MINUTE SERIES, 2023
Station Wind Rose. WRCC Wind Rose Summary Form. (n.d.). https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/wea_windrose.pl?laKSLC

Figure 5

Asbestos Area
4
4
0
0
4400
4220
4230
4230
4240
4240
4250
4250
4260
4260
4270
4270
4280
4280
4290
4290
4300
4300
4310
4310
4320
4320
4330
4330
4340
4340
4350
4350
4360
436
0
4370
4370
4380
4
3
8
0
4390
4
3
9
0
FIGURE
E N E E R SGIN
5

Figure 6

Topographic Map

Figure 7

Floodplain

Map Output Page 1 of 1
ArclMS HTML Viewer Map
f
Salt Lake City
SLCounV Rasander- Cqfqri^fC) 2003 34411l0370f1
Legend
Fraaway
I border
I aGooun
Fgrra_SLCo
ZxneAh
ZsneX
7com.esrixsrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=SLCoFEMA&ClientVersion==4.0&Fom=Tme&En

Figure 8

Wetlands

Map Output Page 1 of 1
ArclMS 3.0 HTML Viewer Map
Maiiomal WdlaiKls Invmlory Jk^ 0.46ml
Legend
y\/ Roadsli
ySi/ Stalas
Wat^nds
iSsiia- Te '.Vale-
>;S:a awl
ya'ie vVctaad
0,Te- VegeiT^d vVc. -iid
ti-3nd Aq Jjic Bed
Ha-id 'tc-aacco js •Vcia-id
Hand fb-es^ed •Veia-ld
tia-id STiD 3»aT3
3aTd
Pond :3-£fMdawni
T da ^ ve.-
_a»e: ^erena *l ver
J3:?e' ^e-c.Tta. ^ ver
HaH-TT tsei; River
*0;*ie- ^c-<:ma. R ver
jDOTd
Oria-
https://mapper.t..yims?ServiceName=nwi_ov4&ClientVersion==4.0&Form=Trae&Encode^ 9/3/2003

DRAWINGS

Drawing 1

Final Drainage Plan

N 5000
E
5
0
0
0
E
5
5
0
0
E
6
0
0
0
E
6
5
0
0
E
7
0
0
0
E
7
5
0
0
E
5
0
0
0
E
5
5
0
0
E
6
0
0
0
E
6
5
0
0
E
7
0
0
0
E
7
5
0
0
N 5500
N 6000
N 6500
N 5000
N 5500
N 6000
N 6500
NIG SREENE
MOUNTAIN VIEW
YLANDFILL FACILIT
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
APPROXIMATE LANDFILL FOOTPRINT
DRAINAGE

Drawing 2

February 24, 2024 vs Final Waste Grade

4
4
0
0
4400
4220
4230
4230
4240
4240
4250
4250
4260
4260
4270
4270
4280
4280
4290
4290
4300
4300
4310
4310
4320
4320
4330
4330
4340
4340
4350
4350
4360
436
0
4370
4370
4380
4
3
8
0
4390
4
3
9
0
E N E E R SGIN
DRAWING
2

Drawing 3

Permitted Final Grades

3Modified By WM Corporate, 2023
Based on Final Grades by HAL, Dated 2019
Permitted Top of Waste Grades
Drawing No.
R Drawn By:
Checked By:
Approved By:
No.
Revisions
Description Date By
Project Location:
1
2
3
4
5
6
A B C D E F G H
6
4
5
3
2
1
A B C D E F G H
EVENTS UPON COMPLETION OF THE PURPOSE OF THE LOAN.
PROPERTY OF WM. IT IS TO BE RETURNED UPON REQUEST AND IN ALL
DOCUMENT IS LOANED FOR LIMITED PURPOSES ONLY, AND REMAINS THE
CONTRACTOR OR AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY WM. THIS
DISCLOSURE OR USE THEREOF IS PERMISSIBLE ONLY AS PROVIDED BY
CONFIDENTIAL AND TRADE SECRET INFORMATION OF WM. REPRODUCTION,
OF WASTE MANAGEMENT ("WM"). THIS DOCUMENT IS, AND CONTAINS,
THIS DOCUMENT AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS THE PROPERTY
0
SCALE IN FEET
100 100 200
Bullseye Design Services, Inc.
UT 0009
Date:
Scale:
Facility ID:
August 2023
1" = 200'
N 5000
E

5
0
0
0
E
7
5
0
0
E

5
0
0
0
N 6500
* LEGEND *
by WM = 76.3 Acres
Total Property Area Controlled
Footprint = 74.0 Acres
Total Permitted Waste
Fill Contours
Area Of No Change
Cut Contours
Isopach @ 2' & 10' Contours Intervals
WD=163' WD=160'
Waste In Place Depth
Salt Lake City, Utah
Mountainview LandfillMark Franc
Mark Franc
4420
4420
4423
4380
4350
4300
4260
4240
4280
4320
4350
4400
4230
4270
4320
4
2
4
0
4
2
8
0
4
3
3
0
W California AveW California AveW California Ave
7
2
0
0

W
7
2
0
0

W
7
2
0
0

W
S
c
a
le
Conc
4222.3
W.L.
W.L.
4246.0
Ut02a23_3-16-23_Mod.dgn 8/18/2023 2:18:05 PM

Drawing 4

Details

APPENDIX

Appendix A

Facility Records

A-1 Permit Renewal Application

Revised August 2018

Division of Waste Management and
Radiation Control
Solid Waste Management Program

Mailing AddressOffice Location Phone [phone]
P.O. Box 144880 195 North 1950 West Fax [phone]
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880 Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 www.deq.utah.gov

APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO OPERATE A
CLASS I OR CLASS V LANDFILL

Please read the instructions that are found in the document, INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICATION FOR A
PERMIT TO OPERATE A CLASS I OR CLASS V LANDFILL. This application form shall be used for all Class I or
V solid waste disposal facility permits and modifications. PPPart I GENERAL INFORMATION must accompany a
permit application. Part II, APPLICATION CHECKLIST, is provided to assist applicants and, if included with the
application, will assist review. Part II is provided to assist in preparation and review of a permit application; it is
not required by rule. The text of the rule governs all permit application contents and should be consulted when
questions arise.

Please note the version date of this form found on the lower right of the page; if you have received this form more
than six months after this date it is recommended you contact our office at [phone] to determine if this
form is still current. When completed, please return this form and support documents, forms, drawings, and maps
to:

Douglas J. Hansen, Director
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
PO Box 144880
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880
Utah Class I and V Permit Application Checklist
Page 1 of 5
Part I. General Information APPLICANT: PLEASE COMPLETE ALL SECTIONS.
I. Landfill Type Class I
Class V II. Application Type New Application
Renewal Application
Facility Expansion
Modification
For Renewal Applications, Facility Expansion Applications and Modifications Enter Current Permit Number U U
III. Facility Name and Location
Name of Facility
Mountain View Landfill
Site Address (street or directions to site)
6976 W California Avenue
County
Salt Lake County
City Salt Lake City Zip Code 84104 Telephone [phone]
Township 1 S Range 2 W Section(s) 10 Quarter/Quarter Section S1/2 Quarter Section SW
Main Gate Latitude degrees 40 minutes 44 seconds 25 Longitude degrees 112 minutes 3 seconds 14
IV. Facility Owner(s) Information
Name of Facility Owner
Mountainview Landfill, Inc
Address (mailing)
6976 W California Avenue
City Salt Lake City State Ut Zip Code 84104 Telephone [phone]
V. Facility Operator(s) Information
Name of Facility Operator
Mountainview Landfill, Inc
Address (mailing)
6976 W California Avenue
City Salt Lake City State Ut Zip Code 84104 Telephone [phone]
VI. Property Owner(s) Information
Name of Property Owner
Mountainview Landfill, Inc
Address (mailing)
6976 W California Avenue
City Salt Lake City State
Ut Zip Code 84104 Telephone [phone]
VII. Contact Information
Owner Contact Name Jose Flores, Jr. Title District Manager
Address (mailing)
6976 W California Avenue
City Salt Lake City State Ut Zip Code 84104 Telephone [phone]
Email Address [e-mail] Alternative Telephone (cell or other) [phone]
Operator Contact Name See owner contact info Title
Address (mailing)

City State Zip Code Telephone
Email Address Alternative Telephone (cell or other)
Property Owner Contact Name See owner contact info Title
Address (mailing)

City State Zip Code Telephone
096R1 & 9811R2
Utah Class I and V Permit Application Checklist
Page 1 of 5
Important Note: The following checklist is for the permit application and addresses only the requirements
of the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control. Other federal, state, or local agencies may
have requirements that the facility must meet. The applicant is responsible to be informed of, and meet,
any applicable requirements. Examples of these requirements may include obtaining a conditional use
permit, a business license, or a storm water permit. The applicant is reminded that obtaining a permit under
the Solid Waste Permitting and Management Rules does not exempt the facility from these other
requirements. Please take note of the heading of each section for the facilities that the section applies to.

An application for a permit to construct and operate a landfill is the documentation that the landfill will be
located, designed, constructed, operated, and closed in compliance with the requirements of Utah
Administrative Code R315-301 through 320 (Utah Solid Waste Permitting and Management Rules) and
Utah Code Annotated 19-6-101 through 126 (Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste Act). The application should
be written to be understandable by regulatory agencies, landfill operators, and the general public. The
application should also be written so that the landfill operator, after reading it, will be able to operate the
landfill according to the requirements with a minimum of additional training.

Copies of the Solid Waste Permitting and Management Rules, the Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste Act,
along with many other useful guidance documents can be obtained by contacting the Division of Waste
Management and Radiation Control at 801-536-0200. Most of these documents are available on the
Division’s web page at https://deq.utah.gov/division-waste-management-radiation-control. Guidance
documents can be found at the solid waste section portion of the web page.

Part II Application Checklist

I. Facility General Information
Description of Item Location In
Document
Ia. Information Required for All Class I and V Landfills
Completed Part I General information Form (See form above)
General description of the facility (R315-310-3(1)(b)) 2.1
Legal description of property (R315-310-3(1)(c)) 2.1
Proof of ownership, lease agreement, or other mechanism (R315-310-3(1)(c)) Appendix 2
Area served by the facility including population (R315-310-3(1)(d)) 4.1
If the permit application is for a class I landfill a demonstration that the landfill is
not a commercial facility NA
Waste type and anticipated daily volume (R315-310-3(1)(d)) 3.1, 4.1
Ib. Information Required for All New Or Laterally Expanding Class
I and V Landfills
Intended schedule of construction (R315-302-2(2)(a)) NA
Name and address of all property owners within 1000 feet of the facility boundary
(R315-310-3(2)(a)(i)) NA
Documentation that a notice of intent to apply for a permit has been sent to all
property owners listed above (R315-310-3(2)(ii)) NA
Name of the local government with jurisdiction over the facility site (R315-310-
3(2)(iii)) NA
Utah Class I and V Permit Application Checklist
Page 2 of 5
I. Facility General Information
Description of Item Location In
Document
Ic. Location Standards for All New Or Laterally Expanding Class I
and V Landfills (R315-302-1)
Documentation that the facility has met the historical survey requirement of R315-
302-1(2)(f) NA
Land use compatibility (R315-302-1(2)(a)) NA
Maps showing the existing land use, topography, residences, parks,
monuments, recreation areas or wilderness areas within 1000 feet of the
site boundary
NA
Certifications that no ecologically or scientifically significant areas or
endangered species are present in site area NA
List of airports within five miles of facility and distance to each NA
Geology (R315-302-1(2)(b)) NA
Geologic maps showing significant geologic features, faults, and unstable
areas NA
Maps showing site soils NA
Surface water (R315-302-1(2)(c)) NA
Magnitude of 24 hour 25 year and 100 year storm events NA
Average annual rainfall NA
Maximum elevation of flood waters proximate to the facility NA
Maximum elevation of flood water from 100 year flood for waters proximate
to the facility NA
Wetlands (R315-302-1(2)(d)) NA
Ground water (R315-302-1(2)(e)) NA
Id. Plan of Operations Requirements for All Class I And V Landfills
(R315-310-3(1)(e) and R315-302-2(2))
Forms and other information as required in R315-302-2(3) including a description
of on-site waste handling procedures and an example of the form that will
be used to record the weights or volumes of waste received (R315-302-
2(2)(b) And R315-310-3(1)(f))
4.6, 4.7, 4.15,
Appendix D
Schedule for conducting inspections and monitoring, and examples of the forms
that will be used to record the results of the inspections and monitoring
(R315-302-2(2)(c), R315-302-2(5)(a), and R315-310-3(1)(g))
4.6
Contingency plans in the event of a fire or explosion (R315-302-2(2)(d)) 4.7
Corrective action programs to be initiated if ground water is contaminated (R315 -
302-2(2)(e)) 4.12
Contingency plans for other releases, e.g. explosive gases or failure of run -off
collection system (R315-302-2(2)(f)) 4.11
Plan to control fugitive dust generated from roads, construction, general
operations, and covering the waste (R315-302-2(2)(g)) Appendix 4
Utah Class I and V Permit Application Checklist
Page 3 of 5
I. Facility General Information
Description of Item Location In
Document
Plan for litter control and collection (R315-302-2(2)(h)) 4.9
Description of maintenance of installed equipment (R315-302-2(2)(i)) 4.9
Procedures for excluding the receipt of prohibited hazardous or PCB containing
wastes (R315-302-2(2)(j)) 4.14
Procedures for controlling disease vectors (R315-302-2(2)(k)) 4.9
A plan for alternative waste handling (R315-302-2(2)(l)) 4.2
A general training plan for site operations (R315-302-2(2)(o)) 4.4
Any recycling programs planned at the facility (R315-303-4(6)) NA
Closure and post-closure care Plan (R315-302-2(2)(m)) 5.2.5
Procedures for the handling of special wastes (R315-315) 4.15
Plans and operation procedures to minimize liquids (R315-303-3(1)) NA
Plans and procedures to address the requirements of R315-303-3(7)(c) through (i)
and R315-303-4 Chapter 4
Approved traffic impact study from the agency with jurisdiction over the roads,
including the safety, operation, and condition of roadways serving the proposed
facility [Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste Act 19-6-108(9)(g)].
4.1
For a facility owned or operated by a local government, disclosure of costs for
establishing and operating the facility [Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste Act 19-6-
108(9)(h)].
NA
Any other site-specific information pertaining to the plan of operation required by
the Director (R315-302-2(2)(p)) NA
Ie. Special Requirements for New Or Laterally Expanding Class V
Landfill (R315-310-3(3))
Submit information required by the Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste Act
Subsections 19-6-108(9) and 19-6-108(10) (R315-310-3(2)(a)) NA
Note the following information must be provided following issuance of the permit
but prior to Director approval to take waste for a new Class V facility .
Approval from the local government within which the solid waste facility sits NA
Approval from the Legislature and the Governor NA

II Facility Technical Information
Description of Item Location In
Document
IIa. Maps for All Class I and V Landfills
Topographic map drawn to the required scale with contours showing the
boundaries of the landfill unit, ground water monitoring well locations, gas
monitoring points, and the borrow and fill areas (R315-310-4(2)(a)(i))
Figure 6
Utah Class I and V Permit Application Checklist
Page 4 of 5
II Facility Technical Information
Description of Item Location In
Document
Most recent U.S. Geological Survey topographic map, 7-1/2 minute series,
showing the waste facility boundary; the property boundary; surface
drainage channels; any existing utilities and structures within one-fourth
mile of the site; and the direction of the prevailing winds (R315-310-
4(2)(a)(ii))
Figure 7
IIb. Geohydrological Assessment for All Class I and V Landfills
(R315-310-4(2)(b))
Local and regional geology and hydrology including faults, unstable slopes and
subsidence areas on site (R315-310-4(2)(b)(i)) 2.2
Evaluation of bedrock and soil types and properties including permeability rates
(R315-310-4(2)(b)(ii)) 2.2
Depth to ground water (R315-310-4(2)(b)(iii)) 2.3
Direction and estimated flow rate of ground water (R315-310-4(2)(b)(iv)) 2.3
Quantity, location, and construction of any private or public wells on-site or within
2,000 feet of the facility boundary (R315-310-4(2)(b)(v)) 2.3
Tabulation of all water rights for ground water and surface water on-site and within
2,000 feet of the facility boundary (R315-310-4(2)(b)(vi)) 2.3
Identification and description of all surface waters on-site and within one mile of
the facility boundary (R315-310-4(2)(b)(vii)) 2.2, 2.3
Background ground water and surface water quality assessment and, for an
existing facility, identification of impacts upon the ground water and surface
water from leachate discharges (R315-310-4(2)(b)(viii))
2.3
Ground Water Monitoring (R315-303-3(7)(b) and R315-308) 4.12
Statistical method to be used (R315-308-2(8)) 4.12
Calculation of site water balance (R315-310-4(2)(b)(ix)) 3.3.3
IIc. Engineering Report - Plans, Specifications, And Calculations
for All Class I and V Landfills
Documentation that the facility will meet all of the performance standards of R315-
303-2 Document
Engineering reports required to meet the location standards of R315-302-1
including documentation of any demonstration or exemption made for any
location standard (R315-310-4(2)(c)(i))
Document
Anticipated facility life and the basis for calculating the facility's life (R315 -310-
4(2)(c)(ii)) 3.5
Cell design to include liner design, cover design, fill methods, elevation of final
cover including plans and drawings signed and sealed by a professional
engineer registered in the State of Utah (R315-303-3(3), R315-303-3(6) and
(7)(a), R315-310-3(1)(b) and R315-310-4(2)(c)(iii))
Figures & Drawings
Leachate collection system design and calculations showing system meets the
requirements of R315-303-3(2) NA
Utah Class I and V Permit Application Checklist
Page 5 of 5
II Facility Technical Information
Description of Item Location In
Document
Equipment requirements and availability (R315-310-4(2)(c)(iii)) 4.2
Identification of borrow sources for daily and final cover and for soil liners (R315-
310-4(2)(c)(iv)) NA
Run-On and run-off diversion designs (R315-303-3(1)(c), (d) and (e)) Drawing 1
Leachate collection, treatment, and disposal and documentation to show that any
treatment system is being or has been reviewed by the Division of Water
Quality (R315-310-4(2)(c)(v) and R315-310-3(1)(i))
NA
Ground water monitoring plan that meets the requirements of Rule R315-308
including well locations, design, and construction (R315-310-4(2)(b)(x) and
R315-310-4(2)(c)(vi))
Appendix E
Landfill gas monitoring and control plan that meets the requirements of
Subsection R315-303-3(5) (R315-310-4(2)(c)(vii)) NA
Slope stability analysis for static and under the anticipated seismic event for the
facility (R315-310-4(2)(b)(i) and R315-302-1(2)(b)(ii)) 3.1
Design and location of run-on and run-off control systems (R315-310-4(2)(c)(viii)) Drawing 1
IId. Closure Plan for All Class I and V Landfills (R315-310-3(1)(h))
Closure Plan (R315-302-3(2) and (3)) 5.1
Closure schedule (R315-310-4(2)(d)(i)) 5.1.1
Design of final cover (R315-303-3(4) and R315-310-4(2)(c)(iii)) 5.1.2, 5.1.3, 5.1.4
Capacity of site in volume and tonnage (R315-310-4(2)(d)(ii)) 3.5
Final inspection by regulatory agencies (R315-310-4(2)(d)(iii)) 5
IIe. Post-Closure Care Plan for All Class I and V Landfills (R315-
310-3(1)(h))
Post-Closure Plan (R315-302-3(5) and (6)) 5.2
Site monitoring of landfill gases, ground water, and surface water, if required
(R315-310-4(2)(e)(i)) 5.2.4
Changes to record of title, land use, and zoning restrictions (R315-310-4(2)(e)(v)) 5.1.6
Maintenance activities to maintain cover and run-on/run-off control systems
(R315-310-4(2)(e)(iii)) 5.2
List the name, address, and telephone number of the person or office to contact
about the facility during the post-closure care period (R315-310-4(2)(e)(vi)) 5.2.6
IIf. Financial Assurance for All Class I and V Landfills (R315-310-
3(1)(j))
Identification of closure costs including cost calculations (R315-310-4(2)(d)(iv))
and (R315-302-2(2)(n)) Table 2
Identification of post-closure care costs including cost calculations (R315-310-
4(2)(e)(iv)) Table 2
Utah Class I and V Permit Application Checklist
Page 6 of 5
II Facility Technical Information
Description of Item Location In
Document
Identification of the financial assurance mechanism that meets the requirements
of Rule R315-309 and the date that the mechanism will become effective
(R315-309-1(1))
Table 2

Revised Feb 2022

U:\SW General Folders\SW-Form\Permit forms\2018 ApplicationForms\2018_Class_I_and_V_application_and_checklist.docx

A-2 Proof of Ownership

e
•
•
HJ_J U t' -(
-:-~:; ··-.. ·--~~j~~--~-~;_::; .. i .. :..: .:-.... r.
·-·.J ··_:• .• :.-:!-·~:i1:~~;.;.t$b~
=·~-· ': · ·· ···' ~~~. ; .... , .... r. ... -.. "•••t.r '""• ... nnr-r ..,.,. OF .. -..cr;o~D,.~rNT : .. " • .• .. _. ,~-.z c!,~;c--:. ~ ~ I'LJ.Y&..I:,d., ,lY&...J;.t
/M ""'· t/4--/ tf . to the
.... -:;-:.e_ .• ~ ·-~'na...ESOFJNCORPORATION
(:~~~J .. ~ -~~:;~-?~--or
_.-;:·<:-:-c ..
, .... , i~'~ ... _., __ ... , BLUo.~F'ILL, INC.
;, ·."";-. •.·:'.. .. -··· ... _ ..... ~
To the Division of Corporation and Corrunercial Code
State ofUtah
-...
.;· ....
...
!~
u. /)f:(! <. · .. -
.... ~ .. ·-. " .(99~ · ..
. ~-..
. .... _
'·
~ :._~-· _: .;, •.
-~
. .• ,_ ·-~
Pursuant to the provisions of the Ut.ah RtJised BusinesS Corporation Al::t, B~Fn... ·. ·
.INC .• a Utah busiDess c;orporation (the .. Company"), does her~y adopt tht following Anicle of
Am~mem: ·
Article l.
The name of the Company shall be changed to '"Mountain-view Landfill. Inc... by
iUilCIUling Article I oft:he Articles oflncorporliiion to read as follows:
•• Anicle I: The IWDe shall be "MouutainView Landfill, Inc.,_
Anicle n.
The amendment wu adopted on December :...1 1998 .
Artidcm.
'' ··;>
The total shares outstanding are ~ \1 0 slw"es of common stock. .all of which were u-
entitled to vote on the amendment, and all of which voted in favor ofthe amendment --.•
BLANDFJLL.INC.
I
-::ODMA\PC"[)()CSIROUSTQN\610Sl9\l
·....::;)
='
•:::>
.s::-
--~
:;:,
:::::> -0 ~
'tOO (jt J l>lmf"\ YIUYlf';f T C:YII TT/~An7~TI VV~ 1n:~T Tn~•~'Tn
(.
~
~
()
I'J
I'J
rot
it)
.L·~
~, R ..
d ,~tier ~ ecora1ng lc: -~-As~¥ 0 "7 u
i\;1ountalrc•;iew l_andfi,!
clo Waste Management Inc
8310 South Valley Highway, Suite 200
Inglewood, Colorado 80112
QUIT CLAIM DEED
SALT LAKE C!TY CORPORATION, 451 South State St., Rm. 245, Salt Lake City,
Utah 84111, a Utah municipal corporation, "GRANTOR", hereby quit claims to,
MOUNTAINVIEW LANDFILL, INC., c/o Waste Management Inc., 8310 South Valley
Highway, Suite 200, Inglewood, CO 80112, as "GRANTEE", for the sum of TEN AND
N0/100THS DOLLARS ($10.00), and other,-,good and valuable consideration, the receipt
' .
and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, ali of its right, title and interest in and to
the following parcel(s) of land situated in Salt Lake County, State of Utah, more
particularly described as follows:
EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.
To intent of this deed is to reconvey to the Grantee, property erroneously conveyed to
Grantor by that certain Special Warranty Deed, dated Feburary 5th, 2001, and recorded
• October 17th, 2001 in Book 8512, Pages 5317 & 18.
DATED ~ .... ,;). -0 .3
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
(
e
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORA TlON
BY~e?
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney's Office
dated /-l-3 -02-
0:
:::X:
ex:
CJ
a-
RECORDED~
c-;
w FEB D 6 2002
\.0
~rTY RECORDEFf"
(
~
• STATE OF UTAH )
)ss
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
~
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this~ day of
\--f..:g}c, 200 z-, by ROSS C. ANDERSON, in his capacity as MAYOR of SALT
LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Utah municipal corporation. ~ NO'TARY PUDLIC
~~
~"~~;v CHRISTINE K. CORDWELL ,-c· • 451 SO. STATE ST .. RM 306 . i ., ~ SALT LAKE em'. UT &11·11
:··· _§ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES KY-/' FEBRUAR'( 15.2005 ~ _ STATE OF UTAH
STATE OF UTAH )
• )ss
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
•
~-Th~ •. f~oing instrument was ac~nowledged . before me this day of
',b . (a (fl Z , by B•. Jones tn her capactty as DEPUTY CITY
RECORDER of SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Utah municipal corporation.
NOTARY PUBLIC, res
Salt Lake County, Utal
lA ~ cc
:;=-:::
<»
Ul
0'\ 0) -o
c:;'"')
U)
U)
0"\
•
•
( .. •
'_.'\-:'1\_J J\.lr\"Y ~., -._,.. --
,(}-) !).OUil"'' :;aA}~ ¢iP~~J
:JiOG->fll?Vl. V1' ;\.rt ,")\.4().iC
~s. }.o)Ol) 7:)::)-?:;co
JAN. 2, 19 9 7
B JdiliP F J..L].
5;9!'l~1.~Q. p_E.sg~IP_'I:l9JL l:IBT __ ()f
~.~OQ 50.1!,-Jl ... ~-~R~ET .. RlG_HT OF W~.X ... ~Q
7 20_Q_}'JES_T STREE'f__RJ~m.'l' .• Q.f-.-W~
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 1300
SOUTH STREET, SAID POINT BEING NORTH ~20'13" EAST ~2.00 FEET ALONG
QUARTER SECTION LINE FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF 5ECTION 10,
TOUNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SALT LAKE BFI.SE AND MERIDIAN AND
RUNNING THENCE NORTH 0°20'13" EAST 1284.27 FEET ALONG SAlP QUARTER
S£CT10N L!NE TO QUARTER-QUARTER SECTION LINE; THENCE NOR1'H
8
~
0
54'08" WSST 2596.29 FEET ALONG SAID QUARTER-QUARTER SECTION LIN~
TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 7200 WEST STREET, SAID
POINT BEING NORTH 0°40'30" EAST 1327.77 l'EET ALONG SECTION LINE
AND SOO'l'H 89°54'08" EAST 55.00 FEET ALONG SAID QUARTER-QUAR'l'£R
S£CTION LINE FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORN~R OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE
SOUTH o0 40'30" WEST 1260.74 FEET ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE;
THENCE SOUTH 44°37'45" EAST 35.11 n;t::T ALONG RIGHT OF \·JAY LINE TO
THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 1300 SOUTH STREET; THENCE :30UTii
89°56'00" EAST 2578.88 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH RlGHT OF WAY LINE TO
T~E POINT OF BEGINNING. (BASIS OF B~ARING: NORTH 89°56'00" WEST
2659.13 FEET ALONG SE~TION LINg)
affects parcel # 14-10-300-011 CONTAINS:76.692 ACRES
(") I 0~ ;,o ,.,o
("):;1:1 on :;oO o-o ,.,-<
::0 •
_, ... -··'·'··'·' -------
-t\
'~ EXHIBIT "A"
a; ~
CX)
en
0"\
CX)
-o
C"'l
(A)
\.0 .....,

A-3 Previous Permit Correspondence

A-4 Fugitive Dust Control Plan

•
g~i ~ Lll"···jl/ /
. i ~il:i~
~~·'.;(:ere i c: t:,I . ..:; :_.':
. Depanment of Environmemal Quality
i Division of Air Qualiry
~
Michael 0. Leavitt · !50 North 1950 West
Governor P.O. Box 144820
Dianne R. Nielson, Ph.D. Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820
Executive Director (80I) 53 6-4000
Richard W. Sprott (80 I) 536-4099 Fax
DireciO< [phone] T.D.D.
www.deq.utah.gov
,-, March 17, 2003
Gary Carter, P.E., Environmental Engineer
Secor International Inc.
308 East 4500 South, Suite 100
Salt Lake City, Utah 84107-3975
Dear Mr. Carter:
LUU.:l
l .
c-_~_~ C>~·=r~~ .. -.:-~-~: --~
',J,f I·
. .
___ ................. _.... '"'----->~ \.-: .......... ~----
.. ---·----~-----'"'
DAQC-428-2003
(. _ . Re: Fug~t~ve Du~t ~ontrol Plan. s_ubmitted February_ 24,. 2003 -Utah Administrative Code (UAC) R307309-4.
: · Fugttlve Ermsswns and Fugttlve Dust-Mountam Vtew Landfill (MVLF)-Salt Lake County
(
• A Fugitive Dust Control Plan (Plan), dated June 24, 2002. was received by the Division of Air Quality from Secor
Intemationallnc.(Secor) in behalf of Waste Management of Utah, Inc. for the Mountain View Landfill (MVLF)
operation. The site is located on 77 acres at 6976 West California Ave, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. The
operation at the MVLF is a permanent project.
•
It does not appear that MVLF is currently subject to a Notice of Intent and Approval Order according to Utah
Administrative Code (UAC) R-307-401. Under tile present operation parameters, tile emissions from theMVLF can be
assumed to be below the five-ton threshold.
The fugitive dust control plan submitted appears to fulfill Waste Management of Utah, Inc.'s requirement to submit a
fugitive dust control plan in accordance with UAC R307-309-4 at this time. Please be advised that any track-out from
the landfill onto a public, paved road, must also be controlled.
This notice does not relieve Waste Management of Utah, Inc. of its obligations to comply with all other applicable
provisions of the UAC.
Failure to fully implement the Fugitive Dust Control Plan and/or failure to comply with the applicable requirements of
the UAC or permit conditions may result in compliance actions, notices of violation and associated penalties.
If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact Gisela Jensen at (80 1) 536-4406.
DAQC-428-:2003
Page 2
• When responding refer to the date on this letter.
(--
\..._ .. •
c •
Sincerely,
7-il ( Ct6"'-
Jeff Dean, Compliance Manager
Division of Air Quality
JND:GIJ:aj
cc: Salt Lake Valley Health Department
,'.~-
•
?-_,
FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL AT THE
MOUNTAIN VIEW LANDFILL
• WASTE MANAGEMENT
•
Mountain View Landfill
6976 West California Ave~ue
Salt Lake City, Utah
February 19, 2003
•
•
•
February 19, 2003
Mr. Richard Sprott
Director, Division of Air Quality
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
150 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
-1! 1 r-• SECOY?
Re.: Fugitive Dust Control at the Mountain View Landfill
Dear Mr. Sprott:
SECOR
J,\JTEJ:j\JA-:-!ONAL
'i''~CJf~POf~ .. ,;f:D
308 Ea-st -.I..,.WJ Soutn. Sui-te 100
~1urray. !J!3n a-.~·~07-39/5
801-268-71CO TEL
801-268-7118 FAX
This letter is provided to the Division of Air Quality (DAQ) in order to confirm compliance with Title
R307 -205-2, Fugitive Emissions for the Mountain View Landfill (MVLF). The MVLF is approximately
77 acres located at 6976 West California Avenue, Salt Lake City, Utah. MVLF is a construction and
demolition landfill that has been in operation since April 1985 under various owners. Since July 1998
MVLF has been owned and operated by Waste Management of Utah, Inc. The MVLF receives
demolition and construction waste as defined by Title R3315-301-2. Wastes that are acceptable for
receipt at MVLF include bricks, concrete, other masonry materials, soil, asphalt. rock, untreated
lumber, rebar, tree stumps, building materials, packaging, and rubble resulting from construction,
remodeling, repair, and demolition operations on pavement, houses, commercial buildings, and other
structures. The facility does not receive asbestos, contaminated soils, tanks resulting from
remediation or cleanup at any release or spill, waste paints, solvents, sealers, adhesives, or similar
hazardous or potentially hazardous materials. The only source of airborne emissions at MVLF is
fugitive dust.
Enclosed with this letter is a Fugitive Dust Control Plan for MVLF to meet the requirements of Title
R307 -205-2. It is our understanding that MVLF is subject to the requirements of Title R307 -205, but
is not subject to Title R307-401, Notice of Intent and Approval Order. We request a reply from DAQ
that confirms MVLF is not subject to Title R307-401 and that the content of the enclosed Fugitive
Dust Control Plan meets the requirements of Title R307-205.
Should you have any questions regarding this letter or the Fugitive Dust Control Plan, please feel
free to contact me at 327-7821.
Sincerely,
ON BEHALF OF THE MOUNTAIN VIEW LANDFILL
~4--~
Gary Pl.. Carter, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
cc: Stacy Anderson -Waste Management
Patrick Craig -Waste Management
Len Butler-Waste Management
Kevin Bertrand -SECOR International Incorporated
Enclosure
Waste Management Fugitive Dust Letter Feb 2003 SECOR INTERNATIONAL /NCORPORA TED
•
•
•
Mr. Richard Sprott
February 19, 2003
Page2
.) E C 0
Fugitive Dust Control Plan
Mountain View Landfill
Sait Lake City, Utah
The primary sources of fugitive dust at the MVLF are haul roads, disturbed areas and stockpiles.
The following control measures shall be implemented at MVLF to minimize the creation of fugitive
dust:
• The vehicle speed limit for paved and unpaved roads and disturbed areas will be 15 miles per
hour. Vehicle speed limit signs are posted to control speeds. r.
• Watering of haul roads shall be conducted as necessary to control fugitive dust.
• Fugitive emissions from land clearing, overburden removal, and disturbed areas at the landfill
shall be controlled by watering as necessary.
...
• Active and inactive landfill material stockpiles shall be watered as necessary to control fugitive
emissions.
• Watering of the soil or alternative cover will be done as necessary to control fugitive emissions.
• Vegetation growth will be initiated and maintained on closed landfill areas to minimize fugitive
dust emissions .
Waste Management Fugitive Dust Letter Feb 2003 SECOR INTERNA nDNAL INCORPORATED
''I
1
J
~
~

A-5 Site Facility Inspection Form

•
I
I
•
•
MOUNTAIN VIEW LANDFILL
Quarterly Permit Facility Inspection
Signature _______________ _
ITEM YES/NO
Have wastes been placed in the appropriate
locations?
Have wastes been properly compacted?
Are wastes being covered to prevent fires?
Are the facility fences, gates, and other
access controls in good condition?
Are the facility roads maintained to provide
safe and reliable access to the disposal
area?
Are the facility run-on/off controls in good
condition and not blocked?
Is final and intermediate cover in good
condition?
Is litter being picked up as necessary?
Is the daily operating record being
completed as required?
Date ________ _
COMMENTS
.... -

Appendix B

Soils Testing

•
•
-t
m
(/
)

::
!

z
G'
)

tr
J

-<

n
0
0
"t
J
m
JJ

•
•
•
-1
m
CJ
)

::
:
:
!

z
G'
)
m
-<

)>

Ro

r G'
)

:c
m
)>

-1

r )>
" m
CJ
)

•
•
•
-1
m
(J
)

~
z
G)
m
-<

("
)

0
r-c:

s:
m
5>

)>

z
)>

r-
-<
~
n
)>

r-
•
':
!
I

CJ
)
m
~
r-m
:5
:
m
z
-1

('
)

)>

r-
('
)

c:

r-
)>

::
!

0 z
CJ
)

•

Appendix C

Well Logs

2/9/24, 8:36 AM waterrights.utah.gov/docSys/v907/e907/e90707zj.htm
https://waterrights.utah.gov/docSys/v907/e907/e90707zj.htm 1/1
WELLPRT Well Log Information Listing
Version: 2003.09.18.00 Rundate: 10/12/2003 11:29 PM

Utah Division of Water Rights

Water Well Log

LOCATION:
S 500 ft W 1000 ft from NE CORNER of SECTION 16 T 1S R 2W BASE SL Elevation: feet
01
OWNER(S):
OWNER: Kleinfelder, Inc
ADDRESS: 2677 East Payley's Way
CITY: Salt Lake City STATE: UT ZIP: 84109
REMARKS: 8014666769Nigel Miller
DRILLER ACTIVITIES:
ACTIVITY # 1
DRILLER: CONETEC INC LICENSE #: 745
START DATE: / / COMPLETION DATE: / /

Appendix D

Drainage Analysis

X
4224
3. 9C J
W. E.
4221. 2
1 8/19/04 DMDE C5 INTO A & B; ADD Kl KAB RDH RDH RDH
REV DATE DESCRIPTION Dm BY DES BY CHK BY APP BY
DATE OF ISSUE
SEPT 2003
nvM BY KLT rvK RY RDH DATE OF ISSUE
SEPT 2003 DES BY SER/ESA APP BY RDH
ShaW^ EMCON/OWT, Inc.
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
MOUNTAIN VIEW LANDFILL
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
DRAINAGE MAP
RGURE NO.
PROJECT NO.
844008

Appendix E

Load Inspection Program

Appendix F

Groundwater Monitoring Plan