DERR-2025-001034

TECHNOLOGIES ING
Maxim Technologies, lnc.
1 127 West 232O South, Ste B
Sdt Lakc City, Utah 841 19
Telephonc l801l 97 2-47 87
Fax (8O11 972-4552
July 1, 1996
Mr. Dale Urban
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
168 North 1950 West l't Floor
Salt l,ake City, Utah 84116
Subject:Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report
Big-O Tire, 208 South Main, Richfield, U
Utah DERR Release Site EHLR
Maxim Technologies Project #5
Dear Mr. Urban:
Enclosed is the Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report for the above referenced facility. The
work was performed under contract #95-1024 and Work Assignment EHLR-I. This report
presents the results of a groundwater monitoring event performed on May 23, 1996.
If you have any questions or comments concerning this report or the project, please call us at
[phone].
Sincerely,
MAXIM TECHNOLOGMS,
g McDonald
Hydrogeologist, UST CC0057
Project Engineer, UST CC0054
Asteco . Austin Research Engineers . Chen-Northern . Empire Soils lnvestigations . Kansas City Testing
Maxim Engineers . Nebraska Testing . Patzig Testing . Southwestern Laboratories . Thomas-Hartig . Twin City Testing
8*$t\6S"
C.
2r*%
6avid Rickers, E.LT.
TECHNOTOGIES I1{C
Prepared For:
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DTVISION OF EI{VIROI{MENTAL RESPONSE AND REMEDIATION
1950 WEST 168 NORTH 1st FLOOR
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84116
QUARTERLY GROIJNDWATER
MONITORING RBPORT
BIG-O TIRE
208 SOUTH MAIN
RICHFMLD, UTAH
Prepared By:
MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
1127 WEST 2320 SOUTH, SUITE B
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84LI9
Project No. 5209600705 July 1996
Asteco . Austin Research Engineers . Chen-Norlhern . Empire Soils lnvestigations . Kansas City Testing
Maxim Engineers . Nebraska Testing . Patzig Testing . Southwestern Laboratories . Thomas-Hartig . Twin City Testing(*tf, .*\nt'
Hydrogeologist
vid Rickeis,'E.I.T.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 INTRODUCTION ....1
2.0 GROUNDWATERMONITORING.. ....1
3.0 GROUNDWATERSAMPLINGRESULTS... ......1
4.0 SUMMARY ....2
5.0 LIMITATIONS ......3
TABLES
Table 1 - Summary of Well Completions and Water Table Elevations
Table 2 - Groundwater Sampling Organic Laboratory Results
Table 3 - Groundwater Sampling Inorganic and Biological Results
FIGIJRES
Figure 1 - Groundwater Contour Map
Figure 2 - Berzerre - Groundwater Isoconcentration Map
APPENDICES
Appendix A - l,aboratory Report and Chain-of-Custody Documentation
Appendix B - Groundwater Monitoring Field Data Sheets
Page
EXECUTTVE SIJMMARY
Groundwater monitoring was performed in May 1996 at Big-O Tire in Richfield, Utah. The
groundwater flow direction is generally toward the southeast at the site with a calculated
groundwater gradient from 0.010 to 0.024 feet per foot. Monitor wells B-1, B-5, B-7, B-9, B-
10, and B-11 were sampled for BTEXN and TPH. l,aboratory analytical results indicate an
similar or slightly lower BTEXNiTPH concentrations in wells B-5, B-7, B-9, B-10 and B-11
since the last monitoring event in February, 7996. Upgradient well B-1 was non-detect for
TPH/BTEXN. Benzene concentrations greater than the RBCA Tier 1 level are present in
monitor wells B-5 and B-9. Naphthalene greater than the RBCA Tier 1 level is present in
monitor well B-9. Laboratory results have detected benzene in B-11, located approximately 220
feet downgradient of the former UST location, for three consecutive monitoring events.
Previously, benzene was not detected in B-11. Consequently, it appears that the benzene plume
in groundwater is migrating downgradient. Monitor wells B-1, B-5, and B-10 were sampled for
geochemical natural degradation indicator parameters. Inorganic analyses from wells B-1, B-5,
and B-10 indicate there does not appear to be natural aerobic biodegradation occurring at the
site, however, anaerobic degradation may be occurring.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Quarterly groundwater sampling was performed by Maxim Technologies, Inc. (Maxim) in May
1996 at Big-O Tire located at 208 South Main Street in Richfield, Utah. The site is assigned
Facility Identification Number and LUST Release Identification EHLR. The purpose of the
sampling was to monitor total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene,
total xylenes, and naphthalene (BTEXN) concentrations in groundwater at and in the vicinity of
the site. In addition, three monitor wells were samples for field analyses of geochemical natural
attenuation indicator parameters. This report presents the results of the May 1996 sampling
event.
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING \f\\ /.4v
Quarterly groundwater monitoring was performed at the site on May 23, 1996. Monitor wells /
B-1, B-5, B-7, B-9, B-10, and B-11 were sampled for TPH and BTEXN during this event. A , l)/.1 .
TPH/BTEXN field duplicate sample was collected from B-5. Monitor wells B-1, B-5, and B-10
were sampled for field analyses of dissolved manganese (Mn), alkalinity, sulfate (SOo'), ferrous
iron (Fe2*), total iron (Fe), and carbon dioxide (CO) using Hach calorimetric kits. Nitrate was
not analyzed for due to interference with the test kit reagents with dissolved petroleum
hydrocarbons. Sampling was performed in accordance with Utah Administrative Code R311-
205.
Static water level measurements of all monitor wells were collected prior to sampling. All
downhole sampling equipment was decontaminated with a detergent (Alconox) wash and triple-
rinsed with de-ionized water prior to use. Each of the monitor wells was purged of a minimum
of three casing volumes using a 1.75-inch-diameter stainless steel or a 3-inch PVC bailer. Purge
water from the monitor wells was poured onto the ground in the vicinity of the former
underground storage tank (UST) location and allowed to infiltrate back into the ground as
directed by the DERR project manager.
Groundwater samples were collected from each well using factory-sealed and decontaminated
disposable bailers. The samples were dispensed into appropriate containers, sealed with teflon-
lined lids, and stored on ice until delivered under chain-of-custody documentation to the
analytical laboratories. Groundwater samples were submitted to Utitity Testing for analysis of
TPH and BTEXN by EPA methods 8015 modified and 602, respectively.
3.0 GROIJNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
The groundwater flow direction at the site is generally toward the southeast, and the calculated
hydraulic gradient for the site ranges from 0.010 to O.024 feet per foot (ftlft). This information
was obtained from static water-level measurements of all site monitor wells prior to groundwater
sample collection. The gradient in the vicinity of monitor wells B-9, B-10, and B-11 is steeper
than the upgradient portion of the site as shown in Figure 1. It is not clear what is causing this
change in the gradient but there have been similar gradient differences in previous quarters.
Table 1 presents a summary of groundwater elevations at the site from monitoring events to
N tD ERR\B r GO1096007 05. R02 Page I
date. A map showing the monitor well locations and the most recent groundwater elevation
contours and flow direction is presented as Figure 1.
Hydrocarbon and/or sulfide odors were noted in purge water from all monitor wells sampled
except B-1. The purge water from monitor wells B-5, B-7, and B-9 was light to dark grey in
color. No free product was noted in any of the monitor wells sampled during this monitoring
event.
Laboratory analytical results of TPH and BTEXN indicate similar or slightly lower
concentrations since the last sampling event in February, 1996. The groundwater sample from
monitor well B-1 was non-detect for all analyzed parameters during this sampling event.
Benzene concentrations of greater than 0.300 milligrams per liter (mg/L), the Risk-Based
Corrective Action Tier 1 screening level (RCBA Tier 1) for benzene, were detected in monitor
wells B-5 and B-9. Laboratory results detected benzene in B-11, located approximately 220 feet
downgradient of the former UST location, at a concentration of 0.111 mglL. Benzene has been
detected in MW-l1 for the last three monitoring events, whereas it was not detected for the two
events prior. Consequently, it appears that the benzene plume in groundwater is migrating
downgradient. Naphthalene concentrations above 0.100 mg/L, the RCBA Tier 1 level, were
detected only in well B-9.
A duplicate sample collected from B-5, labelled B-I2, was analyzed for TPH and BTEXN. The
duplicate concentrations were withi{ryrcent of the values detected in sample B-5.'=
Table 2 presents a summary of the groundwater sample laboratory analytical results to date.
Figure 2 presents an isoconcentration map for benzene in groundwater at the site. The
laboratory analytical reports, chain-of-custody forms, and sampling forms from this sampling
event are included as Appendix B.
Field analyses of Mn, alkalinity, SO42-, total Fe, Fe2*, COr, and dissolved oxygen (DO) were
performed on samples collected from monitor wells B-1, B-5, and B-10. Concentrations of Mn,
alkalinity, SOo'-, Fe and CO, show slight differences between upgradient and intra-plume
concentrations, which may indicate some degree of natural biological degradation of the
petroleum hydrocarbons is occurring. The inorganic field analyses are surrmarized in Table 3.
{.0 STJMMARY
A quarterly groundwater monitoring event was performed at Big-O Tire in Richfield on May 23,
1996. The groundwater flow direction is generally toward the southeast at the site with a
calculated groundwater gradient of 0.010 ft/ft to 0.024 ftlft. TPH and BTEXN concentrations
this sampling event were similar to or slightly lower than the February 1996. Monitor well B-1
was non-detect for TPH/BTEXN. Benzene concentrations greater than the RBCA Tier 1 level
are present in monitor wells B-5 and B-9. A naphthalene concentration greater than the RBCA
Tier 1 level is also present in monitor wetl B-9. Laboratory results have detected benzene in
B-11, located approximately 220 feet downgradient of the former UST location, for three
consecutive events. Previously, benzene was not detected in B-11. Consequently, it appears
N : D ERRIB 1GO10960070 5 . R02 Page 2
that the benzene plume in groundwater is migrating downgradient. Inorganic analyses from
wells B-1, B-5, and B-10 indicate there does not appear to be natural aerobic biodegradation
occurring at the site, however, anaerobic degradation may be occurring.
The following recommendations are made for the Pearson Tire site:
o Continue to collect samples for field analyses of the indicator ions Mn, alkalinity, SOo'-,
total Fe, Fe2*, CO2, and DO.
. Continue groundwater monitoring of selected wells for TPH/BTEXN on a quarterly
basis.
5.0 LIMITATIONS
The sampling documented in this report was performed in accordance with the generally
accepted practices in this geographic area. Maxim has observed the same degree of care and
skill generally exercised by other consultants using the limited data gathered during the course
of the investigation. Specifically, Maxim does not represent that the site contains no other
hazardous materials or conditions beyond those observed during these sampling events.
N : D ERR \B I GO\0960O7 05. RO2 Page 3
TABLE 1
Summary of Well Completionsand Water Table Elevations
Big-O Tlres, Richfield, Utah
)^''tr*
98.44 t2mt93 9.13 89.31
95.77 tA1u93 7.& 88.13
B-11 5-20 95.13 t2^y93 7
All elevations relative to B-1. with an arbitrary eleration of 100 feet.
Static water level measured in feet from top of well casing.
ltrtttttttttttltttt
TABLE2
GroundwaterSampling Organic l-aboratoryResults
Bie- O Tire. Richfield. Utah
Sample
Location
::.:I-:abota,t:ory.,.Anel#:ical:::Re$uttS
Toluene
'li-;/I, \
,,, :.,, :,:,:,:, i,:,,,:,:,:]:,:,:,:,:.:,:,,,],:,:,
Ethylben2ChC, lrm o/I -\
I oial., ,,
XVlenCs/ir-fi \,NCphthalene
/mc/I \
R.CBl Tier,'I,,'*tr,0 O,:3,00 7,000 4.000 73':400 0,100
tt- l LLI tulvs
8,/22t9s
11l7/,9s
2129196,
s't23t96
U,U6U
<0.-5
<0..5
< 0..5
<0.-5
<U.UUZ
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<U.UUZ
<0.002
< 0.002
< 0.002
<0.002
<U.UUZ
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<U.UUL
<0.006
<0.006
<0.006
<0.006
<U.UU4
<0.004
<0.004
<0.002
<0.002
BJIZ rztlLulily3
812219:5"
1il7t95,,
u.o76
<0.-5
<0.-5
<U.UUZ
<0.002
<0.002
< U.UUZ
<0.002
<0.002
<U.UUz
<0.002
<0.002
U.UU4
<0.006
<0.006
U.UU4
<0.004
<0.004
Br'3 LZ,ltul93
,8'l.22,195;.
1il7t9,s,,
0.130
<0.-5
<0.5
<u,0u'2
<0.002
<0.002
< u.0u2
< 0.002
<0.002
<U.UUZ
<0.002
<0.002
U.UU)
<0.006
<0.006
0.005
<0.004
<0.004
b;4 'rzl,LU,l95
8,t22t95;
tt/7,t95,
6.4
5.4
1.7
<0.uzu
0.028
0.006
U.U) /
0.131
0.024
U.ZUU
0.210
0.057
U.96U
0.880
0.154
tJ.rzo
0.071
0.028
IJ i.)121fi193
,8i12195,,.
,t,l/719.5,,,
2129/9-6,,
5:l,2ll :61
27.o
4.3
t.2
t.7
-5.8
U.J4U
0.662
0.492
0.840
0.823
1.500
0.s60
0.139
0.401
0.32t
U.49U
0.'t07
0.037
0.086
0.130
:].3UU
0522
0.116
0.393
0.489
U.OIU
0.049
0.018
0.034
0.039
Duolicate* *5,123/96 4.1 1.140 0.-503 0.186 u.769 0.061ts'7 rzl Lvl,yJ
'r:812219-5,1;1/V;/,9,5,
2,12919,6
'5,123'196
4t.o
8.7
-5.9
9.9
3.6
0.050
0.608
0.t97
0.407
0.219
-5.LUU
0.967
0.083
0.153
0.086
U.6)U
0.247
0.088
0.247
0.097
5.800
1.s40
0.572
1.250
0_470
0.450
0.103
0.0s9
0.114
0.046tl-9 rz,t,7fr193
,8lz:2195,
:tt1719,5
z,lz9!19,6,
:5tt23't,96,'
J).U
8.9
7.1
4.t
2.4
t;tuu
1.090
0.867
0.917
0.656
<0.10
0.087
0.065
0.071
0.045
1.1U0
0.438
0.349
0.383
0.2t6
I.YUU
1.100
0.722
0.613
0.389
U.OOU
0.151
0.194
0.191
0.t20llr tu TZLLAtgs
,8t12/95..tlll:V,l9,S'
2129t,96
5t23t96
u./
8.6
5.4
1.1
0.5
U.UU5
0.089
0.104
0.068
0.0-55
U.UU6
0.006
0.0r2
0.006
0.004
U.UbI
0.278
0.262
0.2s4
0.180
U.IOU
0.067
0.078
0.064
0.050
u.u-io
0.207
0.143
0.086
0.0-s9Bi tr:l tz,l70l93
:8i,122t9i5.,
,,1:L'1,V{95:
:2/,291916
,*1r7lqA
u.'t
3.0
<0.5
0.6
n1
<U.UUZ
<0.002
0.075
0.127
n111
0.00-l
0.005
0.004
0.006
0 noR
<U.UUZ
0.003
0.005
0.008
n ooR
U.UU /
0.015
0.016
0.023
n o?5
U.U.J4
0.010
0.0r7
0.02-s
n o?,
er I - KlsK based correctlve actton scree
nJ* J
DoJJA
)
o1' t*"
wr
* * - QA/QC duplicate sample collected from B --5.l'PII - Totnl Pctrolcum llydrocarbons
NA - Not Applicable
Values in bold are above the RBCA Tier I screening level
ng
ltttttttttlttt!tttt
TABLE3
GroundwaterSampting Inorganicand Biological LaboratoryResu lts
\- Bis-O Tlres. Richfield- Utah *if ' 6?
NA - Not Applicable 4r-,y"lSf N:\DER R\BI Go\BoINoR G'wK3
(
\<-Big-O Tires, R Utah 2<
......rgruus,
,.: :',,:':,::ilf-On,,'i:.',
i.:r::il:f tiili#,:I-iil
,,,,,,,,i,fdtH]
i''..'i.,;t.tffou
:::::'tndlii;ll,:
...1flr,iUdu.
Dissolvet,
:.::.:::
j'r*::i
eti€G i[o,phiitI:I:x:::id;I:'i::::ia::::::
t:':':':':'l: l
Ir].iinn
,tl:.j.:iiiiriiits l-:il iiiiii:i:ii
iiiii::iit:.:ruEx1,l':':'
.., lll.......lll,:*.'ffi
0.3
0.1
0.25
3s0
260
300
2.0
<0.02
NA
59
75
60
<0.01
<02
0.2
NA
0.4
0.5
NA
36
25
NA
1.0
--r2
8.00E+06
NA
)NA
3.11E+09
NA
NA
f.8.*,5....' lrl,oT '
Il:].:]lil].]l:l.:il1l...:tl:lillli
r.i.:tt!i::i ti::t::::.:.:; :r'
,212i9J9i6.;,.j,.,,t;,,;;1:'1,l3it,
)'P9'lll),$,,,i;,,;.",,fi ;,eld
's, rts'i t,9 6','," fr t t' d
0.064
<0.1
<0.1
380
330
340
0.05
<0.02
NA
<5.0
<50
<50
<0.01
<0.2
<02
NA
0.8
0.7
NA
30
25
NA
0.6
12
1.30E+05
NA
2.958+09
NA
NA
i,iiiiiBi-iil0i.irl
$u4n*:l
'.,II*I,I
' ) P- N !$1 ":":':"':':156
2 E'1i9, I 19.,6,,:.,,freld
,::,:,:5i"f23'I96':,.:';...fi Eld
0.r7
<0.1
<0.1
450
370
440
<0.01
<0.02
NA
<5.0
<50
<50
<0.01
3.6
1.2
NA
5.4
3.2
NA
60
60
NA
0.9
..-fl
1.70E+05
NA
rNA
2.85E+09
NA
NA
^9gJ
Vocont Lot
200 SouthB-2
95.20
Vscont Lot
J00 South
B-1 0
92.79
J.
B-7 t
5't-91
Excovutlon
o
"i'
go'
o
go'
.B-g
90.68a,/
{-'/
C.lot-+Jlt1
.co
=
B-1'l a
88.65
8g.o-
LEGEND
Monitoring Well with
Groundwoter Elevotion
Groundwotor Elevotion
(Feet) on S/2J/e6
Contour (Feet)
a B-11
88.65
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR MAP
TECHNOLOqES INC
A
N
Approximote Scole (Ft)
E-:-l
DERR - Blg-O-Tire, Rlchffeld
200 South Moin Street
Rlchfield, Utoh
CAD: l17O94cD Job: 5209600705 Figure 'l
B-1 04.s/<0.002 200 South
B-4
NS
Big-O-Tirc
B-10
0.s/0.0ssa' 8-114
o.7 /o.111
J00 South
o
@
(n
so
LEGEND
B-1r. Monltoring Well with
<0.s/o.o7s TPH/Benzene Concentrotion in
Groundwotar (mg/L) on S/2J/96
>0.J0 ---\ Benzene lsoconcentrotion Contour (mq/L)
BENZENE-GROUNDWATER ISOCONCENTRATION MAP
TECT{NOLOdE:I tNC
N
Approximoto Scole (Ft)
---t
DERR - Blg-O-Tire, Richfteld
200 South Mqln Street
Richfield, Utoh
CAD: 117094cE Job: 5209500705 Figure z
UTILITY TESTING LABORATORY
875 SO. CHESTNUT ST.
P. O. BOX 25005
SALT LAKE CIW, UTAH 84125
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
irDJune7, 1996 t I u u-1
b t-""- ir*r -u r-
ii#Ttll%2o sourhsuiteB J"'itr 1 ;' $96
Salt kke City, UT 8r'.tlg
Attention: Mr. David Rickers
Subjecr TPHETEXTesting - BIc O TIRE - 52CDffi705
Sample C.ollected: 23 MAY !)5
Sample Received: 24.MAY 96
Comments: NONE
TOTAL PETROLEIIM ITYDROCARBONS (TpH) - GASOLINE & DIESEL
(MODIFTED CALTFORMA METHOD 8015)
PRACTICAL QUANTITATIVE LIMITS: 10 ppm SOIL, .5 ppm WATER
Test No. WATER SAMPLE Test Results mq/Ke. ms/L (onm)
5-24-96-15 B - 11 0.1 mgtL Gasoline
< 0.5 mg/L Diesel
Date Analyzed: 0.7 mg/L TpH
26 MAY 96
BTEX
sw-846 METHOD 8020 (SOrL), METHOD 602 (WATER)
USING PURGE & TRAP METHOD 5O3O
PRACTICAL QUANTITATIVE LIMIT: 5 ppb SOIL 2 ppb WATER
Test No. WATER SAMPLE Test Results uey'Ks. uey'L (ppb'l5-24-96-LS B - 11 111 pgll- Benzene
7.7 pglLToluene
Date Analyzed: g.4 *ilL Ethylbenzene
01JUN 96 25.t pglLXylenes, Toral
32.2 ltglLNaphthalene
- UTILITY TESTING I..A,BORATORY
b.-n.1Zzz-az*<//
D. M. Thorsen
UTILITY TESTING LABORATORY
875 SO. CHESTNUT ST.
P. O. BOX 25005
SALT I.AKE CIW, UTAH 84125
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
June 7, 1995
Maxim Tech
1127 West 2320 South Suite B
Salt Lake City, I-IT 8r'.Llg
Attention: Mr. David Rickers
Subjecu TPFVBTEX Testing - BIG O TIRE - 5209ffi705
Sample Collected: 23MAy %
Sample Received: 24MAY %
Comments: NONE
rorAlPErRol(,}HrHP"19gffiSil:ffifi];St33r'*'&DIESBL
PRACTICAL QUANTITATIVE IIMITS: 10 ppm SOII .5 ppm WATER
Test No. WATER SAMPLE Test Results me/Ks. me/L (pom)5-U-96-t6 B -7 3.6 mgtL Gasoline
< 0.5 mgl. Diesel
Date Analyzed: 3.6 mg/L TpH
?6MAY 96
BTEX
sw-846 METHOD 8020 (SOIL), METHOD 602 (WATER)
USING PURGE & TRAP METHOD 5O3O
PRACTICAL QUANTITATIVE LIMIT: 5 ppb SOIL 2 ppb WATER
Test No. WATER SAMPLE Test Results u!y'Ks. usll, (ppb)
5-24-96-16 B-7 ZL9 yglLBenzene
85.6 lrglLToluene
Date Analyzed: 96.6 pgfu Ethylbenzene
31 MAY 95 a7O pglLXylenes, Total
46.3 ttgLNaphthalene
F UTILITY TESTING LABORATORY
tr. *.1 ,-l-yl-:z---
A'
D. M. Thorsen
UTILIry TESTING LABORATORY
875 SO. CHESTNUT ST.
P. O. BOX 25005
SALT I.AKE CIW, UTAH 84125
PHONE: [phone]s
FAX: [phone]il33
June 7, 1996
Maxim Tech
1127 West 2320 South Suite B
^
Salt I-ake City, UT 84U9
Attention: Mr. David Rickers
Subjecc TPFVBTEXTeSting - BIc O TIRE - 5209rffi705
Sample Collected: 23 MAY 96
Sample Received: 24MAY 96
Comments: NONE
rorAl*""o',,tBf,Hf"tt$J$lli[Hfi];St33irNE&DIESEL
PRACTICAL QUANTITATM LIMITS: L0 ppm SOII. .5 ppm WATER
Test No WATER SAMPLE Test Results mgy'Ks. msy'L (pom)
5-24-96-L7 B-9 Z.4mglLGasoline
< 0.5 mg/L Diesel
Date Analyzed: L4 mgtLTpH
26MAY 96
BTEX
sw-846 METHOD 8020 (SOrL), METHOD 602 (WATER)
USING PURGE & TRAP METHOD 5O3O
PRACTICAL QUANTITATIVE LIMIT: 5 ppb SOIL 2 ppb WATER
Test No WATER SAI\{PLE Test Results uey'Ks. uslt. (oob)
5-24-96-17 B-9 656 pglLBenzene
44.9 pglLToluene
Date Analyzed: 276 pgtL Ethylbenzene
3L MAY 96 389 ltglL Xylenes, Total
120 pgfuNaphthalene
UTILIry TESTING I-ABORATORY
\. +r< .1/.za-:z-,-srJ
D. M. Thorsen
UTILIry TESTING LABORATORY
875 SO. CHESTNUT ST.
P. O. BOX 25005
SALT I.AKE CITY, UTAH 84125
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
June 7, 1996
Maxim Tech
1127 West 2320 South Suite B
_ Salt Lake City, UT 841t9
Attention: Mr. David Rickers
Subject TPH/BTEX Testing - BIG O TIRE - 520Frffi705
Sample Collected: 23 MAY 96
Sample Received: 24MAY 96
Comments: NONE
rorALPErRoL(#HrHfrHgffiff
ili[Hfi];St33irNE&DIESEL
PRACTICAL QUANTITATIVE LIMITS: 10 ppm SOIL, .5 ppm WATER
Test No. WATER SAMPLE Test Results mey'Ks. mey'L (ppm)
5-24-96-18 B - 10 0.5 mg/L Gasoline
< 0.5 mg/L Diesel
Date Analyzed: 0.5 mg/L TpH
26MAY 96
BTEX
sw-846 METHOD 8020 (SOIL), METHOD 602 (WATER)
USING PURGE & TRAP METHOD 5O3O
PRACTICAL QUANTITATIVE LIMIT: 5 ppb SOIL 2 ppb WATER
Test No WATER SAMPLE Test Resulrs Bs/Ks. usy'L (pob)5-24-96-18 ts - 10 55.a pgL Benzene
4.4 ttglLToluene
Date Analyzed: 1g0 pgll- Ethylbenzene
28 MAY 96 50.0 pg/L Xylenes, Total
58.8 pgll- Naphthalene
^ UTILITY TESTING LABORATORY
b.+yt
D. M. Thorsen
UTILITY TESTING LABORATORY
875 SO. CHESTNUT ST.
P. O. BOX 25005
SALT I.AKE CITY, UTAH 84125
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: (801) e73-8333
June 7, 1996
Maxim Tech
1127 West 2320 South Suite B
Salt I-ake City, UT 84LL9
Attention: Mr. David Rickers
Subjecu TPHETEXTesting - BIG O TIRE - 5209ffi705
Sample Collected: 23 MAY %
Sample Received: 24MAY 96
Comments: NONE
rorAlP,rRoffiHr##1ffiSffiiliffifi];St33i'rNE&DIESEL
PRACTICAL QUANTITATIVE LIMITS: 10 ppm SOII .5 ppm WATER
Test No. WATER SAMPLE Test Results mey'IG. ms/L (oom)5-24-96-t9 B-5 5.S mg/LGasoline
< 0.5 mg& Diesel
Date Analfzed: S.A mgru ffft
26 MAY 96
BTEX
sw-846 METHOD 8020 (SOIL), METHOD 602 (WATER)
USING PURGE & TRAP METHOD 5O3O
PRACTICAL QUAI.iTITATIVE LIMIT: 5 ppb SOIL 2 ppb WATER
Test No. WATER SAIVIPLE Test Results Fe/Ks. ue/L (pnb)
5-24-96-19 B-5 BZ3 pglLBenzcte
321 pgll Toluene
Date Analyzed: BA pgL Ethylbenzene
31 MAY 96 a9S pglL Xylenes, Total
39.a pgLNaphthalene
UTILITY TESTING LABORATORY
b.va - 14zz-l-*--zg
D. M. Thorsen
UTILITY TESTING LABORATORY
875 SO. CHESTNUT ST.
P. O. BOX 25005
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84125
PHONE: [phone]s
FAX: [phone]
June 7, 1.996
Maxim Tech
1127 West 2320 South Suite B
Salt I-ake City, UT 8/llg
Attention: Mr. David Rickers
Subjecu TPHIBTEX Testing - BIG O TIRE - 5209ffi705
Sample Collected: 23 MAY 96
Sample Received: 24MAY 96
Comments: NONE
rorALPErRoLdHrHHtXtr*ili[Hfi];StiSirNE&DrEsEL
PRACTICAL QUANTITATIVE LIMITS: 10 ppm SOIL .5 ppm WATER
Test No WATER SAMPLE Test Results mey'Ks. ms/L (npm)
5-24-96-20 B-1 <05 mg/Lcasofine -< 0.5 mg/L Diesel
Date Analyzed: < 0.5 mg/L TPH
26MAY 96
BTEX
sw-846 METHOD 8020 (SOIL), METHOD 602 (WATER)
USING PURGE & TRAP METHOD 5O3O
PRACTICAL QUANTITATIVE LIMIT: 5 ppb SOIL, 2 ppb WATER
Test Nu WATER SAMPLE Test Results pg/Ks. Lrs/L (pob)
524-96-20 B-1 <2 pglLBenzene
< 2 ltglL Toluene
Date Analyzed: < 2 pilL Ethylbenzene
28 MAY 96 < 6 VilL Xylenes, Total
< 2 ttilL Naph&alene
UTILITY TESTING LABORATORY
>.?u ,ilzr/Jz-,----
P'
D. M. Thorsen
UTILITY TESTING LABORATORY
875 SO. CHESTNUT ST.
P. O. BOX 2500s
SALT ISKE CITY, UTAH W125
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: (801) e73-8333
June 7, 1996
Ma,xim Tech
11.27 West 2320 South Suire B
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
Attention: Mr. David Rickers
Subjecu TPHETEX Testing - BIG O TIRE - 5209600705
Sample Collected: 23 MAY 96
Sample Received: 24MAY 96
Comments: NONE
rorALPBrRoffiHrffi
19gffiRilitHfil;St33"l*'&DIESEL
PRACTICAL QUANTITATIVE LIMITS: 10 ppm SOII .5 ppm WATER
Test No. WATER SAMPLE Test Results ms/Ks. ms/L (nom)5-24-96-2L DUPLICATE I 4.t mglL Gasoline
< 0.5 mg/L Diesel
Date Analyzed: 4.1 mg/L TpH
26 MAY %
BTEX
sw-846 METHOD 8020 (SOIL), METHOD 602 (WATER)
USING PURGE & TRAP METHOD 5O3O
PRACTICAL QUANTITATIVE LIMT: 5 ppb SOII4 2 ppb WATER
Test No. WATER SAMPLE Test Results uey'Ks. usll, (nob)5-24-96-21 DUPLICATE 1 1,14O pglL Benzene
503 pgll Toluene
Date Analyzed: lK ttgL Ethylbenzene
31 MAY 96 789 pglL Xylenes, Total
6L.2 pglLNaphthalene
UTILITY TESTING LABORATORY
D-wt 1zz>jz-i'
D. M. Thorsen
I
De O irN
Project or Site Name
1) 0VU00? C'5
Project Number
,,4pt ) fi1( *;rv, lj
Sampler Nametf,rinted)
I I I I l_ t',
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
TECHNOTOGIES INC
1121 West 2320 South, Suite B
Salt Lake City, Utah 841 19
Phone [phone] . Fax [phone]
| ,, r -uqj l, TJD
hruvl &cku,rS
Contact or Beport to
tlJ"i ('l.f,17D 5, !;r.fu B
Contact Address or Location
SAMPLE LOCATION
OR DESCRIPTION
0^Y[,,*,
LAB NUMBEB
a\
)*\Ja
\
{
{J\\.\
\..
)J,\
D o ily f ield Log
TECHNOLOGTES INC
Activitiv or Commenls
.
:f
:
t.0
tl'ltl,l-l el
LC,o.5
Fe-rL 0,'?.,lo.r l5o
Te^.rb
o l,L
t.lr\a
14,
,bl x 0 .(B=
Recorded By,
Depth to Water (ft) WL:.Ltg
Total Well Depth (ft) TD:
Volunre
Well No: B- il
Field Measurments
SC
€#/nzo-_Ttr-
b7
pH
7,'ry
1,,L.X
1'?-4
-
Remarks/Notes
Type of Well:
Purge Method:
Sample Method:
/
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATA SHEET
H+l*tingdon-E egine.erinp&_ Envir onm ental_
Sp ecif ic Co nductance Correctio n Works heet
SC of
Standard
(A)
Temo of
StaniJard
Temp Con
Factor
(B)
Standard
Reading
(c)
Cell
Factor
(A/Frc) = D)
Temperature Correctbn
FactorTable
Samole
Reading
(E)
Temo of
Saniple
Temp Con
Factorn
Conected
SC
(DlExD
2
3-4
5
6
7
BI
10
11
12
0
1
13
14
15
1.84
1.79
1-74
1.68
1.G3
1.sB
1.54
1.50
1-46
1.42
1.38
1-3s
1.s2
'1.29
1.26
1.23
17
18
19
20
21
2.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
1.18
1.15
1.13
1.10
1.O8
1.06
1.04
1.O2
1.00
0.98
0.96
0.94
0.92
0.90
0.88
0.86Bottb pqranreters preservative49 rug -rP+ /Arr, N ""'_
Sample Time
Analytical I,ab orato rv
-zLLh-Lt/-'t
ffHi,i:,ffi;t1tffiw
Casing Diameter (in) CDF
PurgeVolume: [I-D-WU@
Well No: E- 7
Persnn
Weather: -A .rt,:l
w
Type of Welt:
Purge Method:
pH
1,t14z-
-f,za-
SC
boahe*gT
t-
Time Volunre Temp
15,l
Field Measurments
Remarks/Notes
DO
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATA SHEET
Huntingdon Engineering & Environm ental
SC of
Standard
(A)
Temo of
Staniard
Specif ic Conductance Correction Worksheet
Temp Con Standard C€llt-actor Reading Factor(B) (c) - (n/(Bxc)'= D)
Samole
Reading
(E)
Temo of
Saniple
Temp Con
Factorn
Conected
SC
(DlExF)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
I.t0
11
12
-l
0
1
13
14
15
1.84 171.79 181.74 191.6B 201.&3 211.sB 221.54 231.50 241.46 251.42 261.38 271.3s 281.32 A1.29 301.26 311.23 32
1.18
1.15
1.13
1.10
1.08
1.06
1.04
1.O2
1.00
0-98
0.96
0-94
0-92
o-90
0-88
0-86P4rarneters preservative/ pH,/E -(axq ' ii;\""
Sampte ri.n" l[ ] M
g"p|to.Water (ft) Wr | ,Lq
Total Well Depth (ft) TD:---*-t f-
Casing Diameter (in) CDffi
PurgeVolume: OD-WL)@
Weathec /\''^, '
Type of Well: ,17147ui7lL
SC
Cs
( a4'noo---.---+-
.-
pH
1,tL-fr 7(^
-a-, lo-
Temp
1b.,,6ib,7-
=
Purge Meftod:
Field Measurments
Remarks/Notes
Othert
6lt{^ot-
Time Volurne
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATA SHEET
Huntingdon Engineering & Environmental
SC of
Standard
(A)
Temo of
Standard
Specif ic Conductance Correction Worksheet
Cell
Factor
(A/(BxC) : D)
Temp Con StandardFactor Readino(B) (c) "
Temperature Conectbn
FactorTable
Samole
Reading
(E)
Temp of
Sampte
Temp Con
Factoro
Conected
SC
(DlExF)
;
1
2
3-'4
5
b
7
8
9
10
11
12
1.84
1.79
1.74
1.68
1.63
1.s8
1.s4
1.s0
1.46
1.42
1.38
1.3s
1.32
1.29
1.26
1.23
17
1B
19
20
212
23
24
25
26
27
28D
30
31
32
1.18
1.1s
1.13
1.10
1.08
1.06
1.04
1.O2
't-00
0.98
o.96
0-94
0-92
0.90
0-88
o.86
13
14
15Preservative
t4t:.t
Sample n*" ll'.6
tudytL"! t4boratory
0{nZ-l2rz^
Depth to Water (ft) VlrL: _ 5'? O
TotalWell Depth (ft)TDT
cacing Diamerer iiil co*
PurgeVolume: CfO-Wt_@
Well No: _ g:LO
P".*nn"
Weather:
U
Temp
Ibi5's__EL_
pH
1, t&--]q-
--ats -
SC
(ot o1ffi
7@
.-
LA .t
Specific Conductance Correction Worksheet
Temp Con StaMard C€llFactor Readinq Factor(B) (c) - (n/(Bxc) = D)
Type of Well:
Purge Metrod:
Field Measurments
Remarks/Notes
^!
DO
o
I
SC of
Standard
(A)
Temo of
Stanilard
0
1
1.84 171.79 181.74 191.68 201.63 211.58 221.54 2s1.so 241.46 2s1.42 261.38 Z71.3s 281.32 231-23 301.26 311.23 32
1.18
1.15
1.13
1.10
1.08
1.06
1.04
1.02
1.O0
0.98
0.96
0.94
0.92
o.90
0.88
0.86
Samole
Reading
(E)
Temo of
Saniple
Temp Con
Factor
(R
Corrected
SC(Dfxfl
2
3:.4
5
6
7I
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
. Boftb .4.a.pararneters preservativeUe rwf- TPn'^*',fiun Hcl
sampre n*" lCi95
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATA SHEET
Huntingdon Engineering & Environm ental
Analytical Laboratorv'( 4a ,rn
I
Depth to Water (g !ln_:C,bxTotal Welt Depth 1q fO:
-
:7n
Casing Diameter 1in1 COi
Purge Volume: [D-WqZs xl6)" x 3 :
Temp
15l?,7t)a+-
P"r*nn
Weathec *7t
o".,,,2\I-
gs
Field Measurments
pH'7.78-T*{-
1,q5
SC
t+D
DO
3rww, o"Gtr
Type of Well:
Purge Metrod:
ple Method:
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATA SHEETH"-ti-gde- la"grneering & Frrvrronmental -
Sp ecif ic Co nd uctan ce Correction Works h eet
SC of
Standard
(A)
Temo of
Stantard Cell
Factor
(A/(Bxc) = D)
Temp Con StandardFactor Reading(B) (c) -
Temperature Conection
Factor Table
Samole
Reading
(E)
Temp of
Sampte
Temp Con
Factor
(R
Conected
SC
(DExR
1
2
J-4
5
6
7
I
9
10
11
12
't3
14
15
1.84
1.79
1.74
1.68
1.63
1.s8
1.9
1-s0
1.46
1.42
1.38
1.35
1.32
1.n
1.26
1.23
17
18
19
20
212
23
24
25
26
27
28
?s
30
31
32
1.18
1.1s
1.13
1.10
1.08
1.06
1.O4
1.O2
1.OO
0-98
0.96
0-94
0-92
0.90
0.88
0.86ai";ft -z f'FEl2. ",:ti"*"
Sampte Time t0 . ?[)
Project:
Location:
Dateflime:
Purge Volume: [D-WL)/25rcD, x s :
Time Volurne
Depth to Water (ft) WL: 1 ,t,l
TotalWelt Depth (ft)TDT
lasino Diame{er (int co,ft
Type of Well:
Purge Method:
Field Measurments
PH SC
1,.)X--rF--).tt
DO Other
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATA SHEET
I{uutingdon5agiaeering &-Enfi ronm cn tal
Specific Co nductance Correction Worksheet
SC of
Standard
rgp-
Samole
Reading
(E)
-------
Temo of
Staniard
/U
Temp Con
Factor
u) r"
Standard CellReading Factor
t!?o '*ileo'
Temp of
Sample
Temp Con
Factor
(F)
Corrected
SC(Dfxfl
1.84 171.79 181.74 191.68 201.6s 211.58 221.54 231.50 241.46 251.42 261.38 271.3s 2A1.s2 A1.n 301.26 s11.23 32
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7I
9
10
11
12
1.18
1.15
1.13
1.10
1.08
1-06
1.04
1.02
1.00
0.98
o.96
o-94
o-92
0.90
0.88
0.86
13
14
15I-Pti:*T, t'AT,*"
sampre n*" Q )19