DERR-2025-001006

w*
3*tl
0-oa;rL-,^e4i
UES@
Q*tnc,l-B-V
" *+, & +*, L,*h,J^ u,ul
*- .t, .. b r. ':,
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DTVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE AND REMEDIATION
a
;
i
1
t,
168 North 1950 West
P.O. Box lzl4Szl0
ERRL-0341-95
April 10, 1995
Mr. Terry Chatwin
Huntingdon Engineering and Environmental, Inc.
1127 West 2320 South, Suite B
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
RE: Work Assignment EHLR-I; Additional Site Investigation, CAP Feasibility Study
Implement CAP, Big-O Tire, 208 S. Main Street, Richfield, Utah.
Dear Mr. Chanvin:
The Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) is requesting that
Huntingdon Engineering and Environmental,Incorporated ("Huntingdon") complete the enclosed
Work Assignment Number EHLR-I under contract 95-1024. The enclosed Work Assignment
identifies the work necessary for completing additional site investigation at the site, the
development of a CAP Feasibility Study, and implementation of an approved CAP, all or in part.
If you have any questions concerning this Work Assignment,
Kate Johnson, the DERR project manager, at [phone].
please contact
Sincerely,
L**, ,P*taQ-
/
Bryan D. Whitaker, UST Branch Manager
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
BDWKEJ/jf
Enclosure(s)
Kate Johnson, Contract Representative, DERR
Earl Conroy, Accounting, DERR
,Gz /*-^-
Michael O. Leavitt
Govcmor
Dianne R. Nielson, Ph.D.
Exeutivc DiBts
Kent P. Gray
Dircct6
Salt L:ke Ciry, Utrh 84114-4840
[phone] Voice
[phone] Fax
(801) 5364414 T.D.D.
FTTECOPY
Printed on recycled paper
^
WORK ASSIGNMENT EHLR-I
Contract: 95-1024
Work Assignment EHLR-1, Big-O Tire, 208 S. Main St., Richfield, Utah.
Additional Site Investigation
CAP Feasibility Study
Implement CAP Feasibility Study
The contractor (Huntingdon) is requested to complete the following tasks for this Work
Assignment.
I. WORK OBJECTIVES
Considerable investigation has been conducted at the Big-O site. The DERR wishes to
proceed with a CAP Feasibility study, but recognizes that some questions about the extent
of contamination at the site remain. Therefore, the objectives of this work assignment
include:
Meet with the DERR Project Manager(s) to discuss past work at the site,
and agree upon goals for future investigative work;
Review the DERR file for the Big-O site;
Formally propose the scope of work for the additional investigation;
Complete additional investigation activities;
Complete CAP Feasibility Study;
Implement CAP, if sufficient funding remains within the budget for this
work assignment.
II. TASKS
The Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) has identified the
following specific tasks (as above):
. Meet with the DERR Project Manager(s) to discuss past work at the site,
and agree upon goals for future investigative work;
. Review the DERR file for the Big-O site;
. Formally propose the scope of work for the additional investigation;
. Complete additional investigation activities, and submit as report to the
DERR;
. Complete CAP Feasibility Study and submit to DERR for approval;
trL
\,
. lmplement approved CAP, if sufficient funding remains within the budget
for this work assignment.
. Provide Project Management for each task specified above, as needed.
The expense to the DERR for this shall not exceed 10Va of the total budget
proposed for this work assignmenr.
The expense to the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) for the
development of tasks shown above shall not exceed $60.000.00 including
administrative costs. Huntingdon will notify the DEQ when costs for the Work
Assignment have exceeded 75Vo of the total costs for that Work Assignment, or
Huntingdon has reason to believe that the costs will be greater than the approved
budget.
Each task shown above may, if necessary, include a meeting between the DERR
project manager and Huntingdon's project manager to discuss the final details of
each task prior to submittal to the DERR or prior to implementation.
TIME TABLE FOR COMPLETION OF WORK PLAN
a. The initial meeting between the DERR Project manager(s) and Huntingdon shall
take place within 10 days from the receipt of this work assignment, or by
April 21, 1995, whichever is later. Huntingdon will establish and delineate time
frames and approximate cost for the completion of each subsequent task.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION REGARDING THE WORK ASSIGNMENT
a. Supporting information regarding this site can be obtained for review from the
DERR. You may contact Kate Johnson or John Jones to schedule a time to
review this information.
v.PERSONNEL
Huntingdon will identify their project manager and key personnel for this Work
Assignment in the Work Plan. The contact person (e.g., project manager) for the
DERR is Kate Johnson at [phone].
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
a. Huntingdon is required to report to the DERR prior to proceeding with any task
that will exceed or can be projected to exceed the cost estimate defined in Section
II above.
b. Huntingdon is required to provide a Work Plan and budget upon completion as
outlined in Section III above.
V[ CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Huntingdon will identify and describe any possible conflict of interest in fulfilling
the requirements of the Work Assignment.
Iv.
vI.
^
Approved by:
UDERR Project Manager:
UDERR Contract Officer:
LUST Section Manager:
State Contractor:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
r I - - .-1('t- ) /)
Y S-1:
TEGHNOLOGIES INC
1
August 1, 1995
Utah Departrnent of Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
168 North 1950 West 1st Floor
salt lake city, utah 84116
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
III
:,1 f
I
1
1rure-15I
Attention:
Subject:
Ms. Kate Johnson
Project Manager
Work Assignment EHLR-I; Preparation of Additional Site Investigation Work
Plan for Big-O Tire, 208 S. Main Street, Richfield, Utah
Facility Identification Number 2000326, Release Site EHLR
Maxim Technologies, Inc. (Huntingdon) Project Number 5l-170.25-94
Dear Ms. Johnson:
This letter presents a Work Plan and Budget in partial response to your Work Assignment
EHLR-3, dated April 21, L995. This work is being performed under contract number 95-1024.
This work assignment presents a plan to: 1) Meet with the DERR Project Manager to discuss
past work at the site and agree upon goals for future investigative work; 2) Review the DERR
file for the Big-O site; 3) Complete additional investigation activities; 4) Complete corective
action plan feasibility study for the site; and 5) Perform one quarterty sampling at site.
TASKS
A) Meet with the DERR Project Manager to discuss past work at the site and agree upon
goals for future investigative work;
B) Review the DERR file for the Big-O site;
C) Completeadditionalinvestigationactivities:
o Prepare work plan and budget for additional investigational activities.
o Further define extent and degree of groundwater contamination, and characterae
the subsurface lithology. An auger drill witl be used to advance eight borings to
1127 W. 2320 5., Ste B . Salt Lake City, UT 84119 . 8OL-9724787 . 8OL-g724552 FAX
r AustinResearchEngineers o Chen-Northern o EmpireSoilslnvestigations o EnvirodyneEngineers r Huntingdon. KansasCityTesting
MaximEngineers o NebraskaTesting o PatzigTesting o SouthwesternLaboratories r Thomas-Hartig. TwinCityTesting
{*u.rl\n &'
Asteco
i
Ms. Kate Johnson
August I, 1995
Page 2
D)
depths between 10 and 15 feet. Proposed locations for the soil borings are shown
in Figure 1. Additional borings may be drilled based upon findings of the initial
field screening samples. One soil sample at eight feet (ust above the water tabte)
will be collected from each boring during the investigation.
o Soil samples will be screened for the presence of hydrocarbon vapors using a
Foxboro OVM-128 flame ionization detector (FID) and a detector tube and wash
bottle. A measured amount of soil will be paced in the wash bottle with a defined
volume of water. Air will be sparged through the water/soil mixture in the wash
bottle to strip out the volatile hydrocarbons, which will be measured with the
detector tube. Four of the soil samples will be submitted for total petroleum
hydrocarbons (TPH) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes, and
naphthalene (BTEXN) by EPA methods 8015 modified and 8020, respectively.
o The eight borings, described above, will be completed as eight groundwater and
soil-gas sampling wells. The soil-boring field-screening results will be used to
determine the monitor/sampling well locations. The groundwater and soil-gas
sampling wells will be screened across the static groundwater level so they can
be used as both groundwater monitoring wells and soil-gas sampling points. The
two-inch diameter monitoring wells will be installed to depths of approximately
L4 feet below ground surface (bgs) and will consist of 10 feet of 0.02 slot screen
in a sand pack with a three-foot bentonite seal at the surface. The well/sampling
point locations will be identified in the field in consultation with rhe DERR
project manager. Proposed locations for the monitor wells/sampling points are
shown in Figure 1. The wells will be developed by pumping and surging.
o Maxim Technologies, Inc. (Huntingdon) will contact Blue Stakes and other
appropriate utility companies to mark underground utilities prior to
corlmencement of field activities. The soil boring, well installation, and well
development will be performed by RC Drilling.
Perform one quarterly groundwater sampling at the site:
. After development, groundwater samples will be obtained from six selected new
groundwater wells. The samples will be submitted for laboratory analysis of total
petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes,
and naphthalene @TEXN) by EPA methods 8015 modified and 602, respectively.
/ ***:] if, rn or,-3^f_r:-i* *
*;i-^)-.; r;i' 7' l,:l.l*'
N:tChatwinDERRtliso.tnv "5 pft, ?ntl,r1,*.,k
il { f"{'2}''
1
Ms. Kate Johnson
August l, 1995
Page 3
E)
o One quarterly groundwater sample will be collected from each of the nine
previously installed monitor wells (B-1 through B-11) using proper sampling
protocol pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R31l-205 (1992). These
groundwater samples will be submitted for laboratory analysis of TPH and
BTEXN. Data from two downgradient wells (MW-l and MW-2) at the 7-11
station at 300 South and Main will be included in the Big-O data set. These wells
are shown in Figure 1. For the cost estimate, it is assumed that these samples
will be collected and submitted for analysis by Maxim.
Develop a corrective action plan feasibility study for the site:
o Evaluate the potential use of groundwater air-stripping trench, soil-vapor
extraction (SVE), and/or bioremediation to remove petroleum hydrocarbons from
soil and groundwater. A preliminary indication of the extent of contamination in
groundwater is shown in Figure 2.
o Field pilot tests for an insitu groundwater air-stripping trench and a horizontal
soil-vapor extraction (SVE) system will be performed on-site to determine
effectiveness of these technologies at the site.
o Slug tests witl be performed on two of the monitor wells (B-5 and B-11) to obtain
aquifer parameter information.
The in situ groundwater air-stripping trench pilot tests will involve installation of
one horizontal sparge line placed in a trench which is dug to a depth of 12 feetbgs. The horizontal sparge line will be constructed of two-inch diameter
perforated or porous plastic pipe. The sparge line will be located at a depth of
11.5 feet or approximately two to three feet below the water table. The trench
will be filled with washed pea gravel. A horizontal vacuum-extraction line will
be placed in the same trench above the sparge line as shown in Figure 3. The
extraction line will be installed 7.5 feet above the sparge line and 4.5 to 5.5 feet
above the water table. The vapor-extraction line will be constructed of 2"
diameter SCH-40 PVC screen. The vapor extraction line will be placed at a
depth of four feet bgs, with one foot of gravel will be placed above the extraction
line. An impermeable liner will be placed above the gravel in a keyed trench and
backfilled with excavated material to seal the header from atmospheric leakage
as shown in Figure 3.
The air-stripping trench will be excavated by Robinson Transport of Salina, Utah.
The objectives of the insitu air-stripping trench is 1) to treat groundwater flowing
through the trench by sparging volatile organics (i.e., BTEX) from the
N : lC h arw i nD E RRIB i g O. I nv
groundwater, while it is contained in the trench and 2) to increase dissolved
oxygen in the groundwater down-gradient of the trench.
Three soil-gas/groundwater monitor points will be placed at distances of
approximately five, 15, and 25 feet laterally away from the trench as shown in
Figure 1 (these three wells are included in the eight listed above). Monitor wells
B-3 and B-4 will also be used as monitoring points located 10 and 50 feet from
the trench. Figure 1 shows a plan view of the pilot test layout. Figure 3 presents
construction details of the sparge and vapor extraction lines and monitoring
points.
For the SVE pilot operation, the upper horizontal SVE line will be evacuated and
monitor wells (B-5 and B-7) and the soil-gas/groundwater monitoring points will
be used to monitor the vacuum effects of the SVE in the soil. The SVE pilot test
will involve inducing a vacuum on the vapor extraction header using a
regenerative blower rated at L27 scfm and 65-inches water gauge. The pilot tests
will be run at flow rates of 40, 65, and 90 scfm. Changes in induced vacuum
will be recorded at each monitoring point during each flow-rate test. The
hydrocarbon vapor content will be monitored at the vacuum pump effluent for
each flow-rate test. The vacuum change versus distance from the header to each
monitor point will be evaluated to determine the lateral influence for effective soil
vapor extraction at the site.
The air-stripping trench pilot test, which includes both sparging and SVE, will
involve injecting air from a compressor into the horizontal sparge line at
approximately five pounds per square inch (psi) at flow rates of I0,20, and 40
standard cubic feet per minute (scfm). The SVE line will be operated at
approximately 10 scfm greater than the sparging flow, or 20,30, and 50 scfm.
changes in water level, induced pressure, dissolved oxygen, and hydrocarbon
vapor content will be recorded at each monitor point during each flow rate test.
These parameters will be evaluated to determine the effect of the air-stripping
outside the trench.
The estimated groundwater flow velocity at the site is about 0.03 feet/day for a
groundwater gradient of 0.01 ft/ft. At this groundwater flow velocity,
groundwater would require over five months to travel five feet to the nearest
monitor point. However, the sparging action in the trench will increase the
groundwater level in the trench raising the groundwater flow from the trench.
A piezometer will be placed in the trench to measure the groundwater level in the
stripping trench.
1
Ms. Kate Johnson
August l, 1995
Page 4
N :lC harwi nlD ERRIB i gO. Inv
I
Ms. Kate Johnson
May 26, 1995
Page 5
Soil and groundwater samples will be collected and arnlyzed to assess the
potential for bioremediation at the site. Soil and groundwater samples will be
collected from three areas at the site to evaluate site soil and groundwater
chemistry. The samples will be collected from an upgradient area with no TPH
contamination, an area of high contamination, and an area down-gradient of the
contamination plume. Table 1 lists the parameters for soil and groundwater that
will be analyzed.
Soil and groundwater samples will be ar:,a,lyzed for physical, chemical, and
bioremediation parameters at four separate laboratories. Soil and groundwater
samples will be submitted to American West Analytical I-aboratory in Salt Lake
City for chemical analysis other than TPH and BTEXN (see Table 1). The
TPH/BTEXN analyses will be performed by Utility Testing [aboratory. Soil
samples will be atalyzed for site-specific physical parameters at the Maxim
Technologies, Inc. (Huntingdon) soil laboratory in North Salt Iake. Groundwater
samples will be analyzed for biological parameters at the Richards Laboratory in
Pleasant Grove, Utah.
o Laboratory analytical costs for TPH/BTEXN analyses are approximately $76.50
per sample for soil or groundwater. I"aboratory analytical costs for
bioremediation purposes are approximately $192.00 for soil analysis, $130.00 for
groundwater chemistry, and $60.00 for biological parameters.
Determine the effectiveness of the in situ groundwater air-stripping trench:
o After initially testing the groundwater air-stripping trench determine the air-
stripping trench effectiveness by operating the system for one month. Following
the demonstration test the groundwater in wells B-4, B-5, B-7 and the three soil-
gas/groundwater monitor points will be sampled and analyzed for BTEXN and
TPH. Dissolved oxygen and microbial colonies will measure in the groundwater
sample.
o The off-gas from the in situ stripping trench will be sampled and analyzed for
BTEX and TPH. Required air-quality permits for the demonstration test will be
obtained.
Prepare and submit a report on the additional investigations
o The additional investigations report will describe the CAP feasibitity study and
the stripping trench effectiveness demonstration.
F)
G)
N : lC hatw i nlD ERRIB i g O. I nv
Ms. Kate Johnson
May 26, 1995
Page 6
All on-site personnel will have current 4O-hour Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) training. A site Health and Safety Plan will be prepared by Maxim and will be
reviewed with subcontractor personnel prior to starting work on the project.
The estimated time frame to complete the field work outline above is approximately two weeks.
Monitor well installations and sampling will take place during the first week. Air-stripping
trench and pilot testing will take place during the second week.
Maxim's cost estimate for the above scope of work is included in Table 2. Our estimated cost
for the project described is $45,269.64.
If you have any questions concerning the work plan or the project, please contact us at (801)
9724787.
Sincerely,
MAXIM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Terrence Chatwin, P.E.
Senior Project Manager
a
N : lC h arw i nlD ERRIB i g O. I n v
1
TABLE 1
BIOREMEDIATION LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS
Big-O Tire
Richfield, Utah
Groundwater COD - chemical oxygen demand (HACH 8000)
BOD - biological oxygen demand (EPA 405.1)
Ferrous Iron (spectrophotometer)
Tot Dis Fe - total dissolved iron (EPA 200.7)
NOr'- - nitrate (EPA 353.2)
NOr'' - nitrite (EPA 353.2)
SOnz- - sulphate (EPA 375.4)
Mna* - manganese (EPA 6010)
Soil TKN - total nitrogen (EPA 351.2)
TOC - total organic carbon (EPA 415.1)
P - phosphorus (EPA 365.2)
CEC - carion exchange capacity (EPA 9081)
pH (EPA 90as)
grain size
moisture content
bulk density
Soil/Groundwater total heterotrophic microbial plate count
total microbial gasoline degraders
^
TABLE 2
COST ESTIMATE FOR REMEDIAL IIWESTIGATION
Big-O Tires
Richfield, Utah
TASK A - Meet with DERR Manager
Project Engineer (P3)
Senior Review (P4)
TASK B - Review the DERR File
Project Engineer (P3)
Senior Engineer (P4)
TASK C - Complete Additional Investigational
Activities
Project Engineer (P3)
Project Engineer (P2)
Senior Engineer (P4)
Drafting
Hollow Stem Auger Rig
Detector Tube Field Screening
Lab Analyses - Soil BTEXN/TPH
Lab Analyses - Groundwater BTEXN/TPH
Foxboro OVM-128
Level D Protection
Decon Materials
Groundwater Sampling Equipment
Disposable Bailers
Survey Equipment
Mileage
Lodging
Per Diem
6hrs@
6hrs@
20 hrs @
8hrs@
27 hrs @
5hrs@
20 hrs @
8hrs@
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
4 smpls @
8 smpls @
3 days @
3 days @
3 days @
lday@
8ea@
lday@
340 mi @
2 night @
3 days @
$52.80/hr
85.52lhr
Subtotal
$52.80/hr
82.521hr
Subtotal
$52.80/hr
47.47hr
82.521hr
28.041hr
76.5O/smpl
76.5O/smpl
80.00/day
15.00/day
15.00/day
120.00/day
10.00/ea
20.00/day
.35/mi
50.0O/night
27.O0lday
Subtotal
$316.80
5t3.r2
$829.92
$1,056.00
660.16
$1,716.16
$1,425.60
237.35
1,650.40
224.32
4,725.00
500.00
306.00
612.00
240.00
45.00
45.00
120.00
80.00
20.00
119.00
100.00
81.00
$10,530.67
TABLE 2
COST ESTIMATE FOR REMEDIAL IIWESTIGATION
Big-O Tires
Richfield, Utah
-
TASK D - Quarterly Groundwater Sampling/Reporting
Project Engineer (P2) 26 hrs @
Senior Engineer (P4) 2 hrs @
Lab Analysis - Groundwater 11 smpls @
Lodging 1 night @
Disposable Bailers lL ea @
Per Diem 2 days @
Level D Protection I ll2 days @
Decon Material I ll2 days @
Groundwater Sampling Equipment I ll2 days @
Water lrvel Meter 1 ll2 days @
DO Meter I LlZ days @
$50.52lhr
85.521hr
76.5O/smpl
50.O0/night
10.00/ea
27.00lday
15.00/day
15.00/day
120.00/day
10.00/day
20.00lday
Subtotal
$50.52lhr
35.10/hr
85.52lhr
56.1O/day
rO.20lyd
1 (mon)
1 (mon)
60.00/day
2@.@/day
10.00/day
20.00lday
50.00/day
$1,313.52
t7t.04
841.50
50.00
110.00
54.00
22.50
22.50
180.00
15.00
30.00
TASK E - Develop CAP Feasibility Study
Project Engineer (P2)
Staff Geologist (P1)
Senior Engineer (P4)
Contractor (GAS/SVE trench)
Trench Box
Trench Box Transport
Piping Materials
Gravel
Vacuum Pump Rental
Compressor Rental
Data Logger
Photovac 10570 GC
D.O. Meter
Water Level Meter
Pressure/Vacuum Gauges
50 hrs @
50 hrs @
10 hrs @
Lump Sum
4 days @
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
s3yd3@
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
lday@
Iday@
3 days @
3 days @
3 days @
$2,810.06
$2,526.00
1,755.00
855.20
3,750.00
224.40
320.00
550.00
s40.60
300.00
300.00
60.00
200.00
30.00
60.00
1s0.00
TABLE 2
COST ESTIMATE FOR REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
Big-O Tires
Richlield, Utah
a
Miscellaneous Supplies
Mileage (2 vehicles)
Lodging (2 people for 4 nights)
Per Diem (2 people for 5 days)
Lab Analyses - Biological Parameters
Lab Analyses - Soil Chemistry
Lab Analyses - Groundwater Chemistry
Lab Analyses - Air BTEXN/TPH
Soil Disposal - (estimate)
Disposable Bailers
TASK F - Demonstrate Stripping Trench
Effecliveness
Project Engineer (P2)
Senior Engineer (P4)
Lab Analysis - Groundwater
Lodging
Disposable Bailer
Per Diem
Level D Protection
Decon Material
Groundwater Sampling Equipment
Water Level Meter
DO Meter
Mileage
Lab Analyses - Biological Parameters
Lab Analyses - Air Btexn/TPH
Lump Sum
680 mi @
8 nights @
10 days @
6 smpls @
3 smpls @
3 smpls @
6 smpls @
Lump Sum
3ea@
.35/mi
50.O0/night
27.00lday
60.00/smpl
192.OO/smpl
130.00/smpl
117.3O/smpl
10.00/ea
Subtotal
$50.52lhr
85.521hr
76.50/smpl
50.0O/night
10.00/ea
27.0}lday
15.00/day
15.00/day
120.00/day
10.00/day
20.@lday
.35/mi
60.00/ea
117.3O/smpl
Subtotal
350.00
238.00
400.00
270.00
360.00
576.00
390.00
703.80
750.00
30.00
26 hrs @
5hrs@
6 smpls @
2 nights @
6ea@
2 days @
2 days @
2 days @
2 days @
2 days @
2 days @
340 mi @
4 smpls @
2 smpls @
$15,689.00
$1,313.52
427.60
459.00
100.00
60.00
54.00
30.00
30.00
240.00
20.00
40.00
119.00
240.00
234.60
$3,367.72
COST ESTIMATE
TASK G - Data Evaluation/Reporting
Project Engineer (P2)
Staff Geologist (P1)
Senior Engineer (P4)
Drafting
Camera/Film
Color Copies
Project Management
Project Engineer (P2)
Senior Engineer (P4)
TABLE 2
FOR REMEDIAL II\TVESTIGATION
Big-O Tires
Richfield, Utah
50 hrs @
16 hrs @
15 hrs @
15 hrs @
2 rolls @
Lump Sum
1
25 hrs @
10 hrs @
$50.52lhr
32.50|hr
85.52lhr
30.56/hr
25.00/roll
Subtotal
$50.52lhr
85.52lhr
Subtotal
SUBTOTAL
3 7o Base Fee
TOTAL
$2,526.00
520.00
1,282.80
458.40
50.00
75.00
v,9t2.20
$1,263.00
855.20
$2,118.20
$4t,973.93
$t,259.22
$43,233.15
TEC}INOLOG!ES INC
August 2, 1995
Ms. Kate Johnson
LUST Project Manager
State of Utah
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental Response & Remediation
168 North 1950 West
salt lake ciry, utah 84L14-4840
Reference:Figures for Work Assignment EHLR-1; Preparation of Additional
Site Investigation Work Plan for Big-O Tire, 208 S. Main Street,
Richfield, Utah; Maxim Technologies, Inc. Project Number 51-
170.25-94
Dear Kate:
Enclosed please find three figures that were inadvertently left out of the preparation of the
additional site investigation work plan for Big-O Tire, Richfield, Utah.
Sincerely,
______
i - ",,,,,i s r,,frlE**, Ou?il.', f:,1.""".,:'
ITerrence D. Chatwin, Ph.D., P.E.
Senior Project Manager
Enclosures
TDC:dr
lL27 w.2320 s., Ste B o salt I-ake city, UT 84119 . 80l-9724787 . 8ot-9724552 FAx
Asteco o AustinResearchEngineers o Chen-Northern. EmpireSoilslnvestigations. EnvirodyneEngineers. Huntingdon r KansasOityTesting
MaximEngineers o NebraskaTesting o PatzigTesting o SouthwesternLaboratories o Thomas-Hartig. TwinCityTesting
#ee*w&"
300 South
Note: North/Eaal orlgin ls 2 feet wcat of bock
edgc of motd ond on the north edgo of 500 South.
Horizontol .
Sporge , Trenih
aB-11
:
:oot-.+,
tt'l
.so
', 6o,^;i.Li.a';1
' ?-ll
ooo
IJ
c,o
U
oon
U
ooN
U
a
o
A
o
LEGEND
Monitoring Well
Soil Borlng
Soil Gos Sompling Point
Groundwoter Monitoring Well
SITE MAP
Huntingdon
Englnerlng ond Envr'lronmentol, lnc.
A
N
Approximote Scole (Ft)
--
DERR - Biq-O-Tire, Richfield
200 South Moin Street
Richfield. Utoh
CAD: I17O94GB Job: 51-170.25-94 Fiqure 1
EE
' 500 South u
Notc North/Eoet orlgin lc 2 fcet wcat of bock
cdgo of motel qnd on ths north edgc of JOO South.
ooN
U
a
o
LEGEND
Monitoring lrl/ell
Soil Boring
\ 7 Extent of Benzene plume (O.SS mg/L)i2/1o/93
-\-_-/
in Groundwoter on Dote lndicoted
BENZENE PLUME IN GROUNDWATER
Huntingdon
Englneerlnq ond Environmentol. lnc.
A
N
Approximote Scole (Ft):-
Big-O-Tire, Richfield
South Moln Street
Richtield, Utoh
DERR _
zoo
CAD:117O94GA Job:51-170.25-94 Figure 2
Horizontol SVE ond Sporge Lines\
B-4o
PLAN VIEW
Scole: 1'= 20'
To
From
SVE Blower
Compressor Ground Surfoce
Compoctod
0
1
2
3
4
lmpervious
Fiil
Borrier
A
N c
ooo
A Seols
2' Horizontol
(ot 4 feet
SVE Line
BGS)
10
11
12
Y (ot E to 9.7 feet BGS)
Grovel
2' Horizontol Sporge Line(ot 11.5 feet BGS)
o
5
10
15
)
Scole: 1': 2'
SPARGE/SVE SYSTEM DETAILS
Big-O-Tire )
Horizontol
Horizontol Sporge
SPARGE, VE LAYOUT
SIDE VIEW
Scole: 1"= 10'
Scoles os Shown
DERR - Big-O-Tire, Richfield
200 South Moin Street
Richfield, Utoh
HUntingdOn Enslneerins ond Environmentol. lnc.
CAD: 1'l7O94GC Job: 51-170.24-94 Figure 3
4
State *tUtah
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DTVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE AND REMEDIATION
,\
Michacl O. Lravin
Govcmor
Dianne R. Nielson, Ph.D.
Errcuaivc Dirccta
' Kent P. Gray
Dirrcar
168 Nonh 1950 West j
P.O. Box l,l48,tt)
Salt lake City, Utalr 84114-4840
[phone] Voice
(801) 359-E853 Fax
(Eol) 53G4414 T.D.D.
F!!-[ COPY
ERRL-0990-9s
August 8, 1995
Mr. Terry Chatwin
Huntingdon Engineering and Environmental, Inc.
1127 West 2320 South, Suite B
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
RE: Work Assignment EHLR-2, Big-O Tires, 208 South Main, Richfield, Utah
One Quarter Groundwater Sampling (Task D)
Dear Mr. Chatwin:
The Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) has completed a review of
the Work Plan Outline and Budget for one quarter groundwater monitoring (Task D, Table 2) at the
above-referenced release site, received on August 1, 1995, under contractllg5-1024. Thank you for that
submittal.
The DERR is requesting Huntingdon to complete Work Assignment Number EHLR-2 under
contract #95'1024, as per your August I proposal. A copy ofthat proposal is anached for your refercnce.
The amount budgeted is $2,810.06. Please sign both copies of the work assignment signaure page and
return a copy to the DERR. If you have any questions concerning the enclosed work assignment, please
contact Kate Johnson, the DERR project manager, at [phone].
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
BDWKET/jf
Enclosure(s)
cc: Kate Johnson, Contract Officer, DERR
Earl Conroy, Accounting, DERR
Printed on recycled pap€t
\,v
EEI,R-2
Btg-O fires, Richfreld' Utah
One Quarter Groundwater Monitoring
Approved as submittedlUuHuntingdon, as shown in attachment, Table2, Task D.'}tr*ia Tep&o*AOr ".:
UDERR Project Manager.
UDERR Conhact Admini
LUST Section Manager.Date:
Date:-
D,*' Q''?-i
,^
Stare '*tUtah
,\
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALTTY
DTVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE AND REMEDIATION
Michael O. l-eavin
Govcmor
Dianne R. Nielson, Ph.D.
Ercudvc Dirccta
- Kent P. Gray
Dirta
168 Nonh 1950 West I
P.O. Box l,14E4O
Salt Late City, Uah 841t4-4840
(t0l) 536-41(X) Voice
(E0l) 359-8853 Fax
(80r) 53644t4 T.D.D.
F !!. I CSPY
ERRL-0990-95
August 8, 1995
Mr. Terry Chatwin
Huntingdon Engineering and Environmental, Inc.
1127 West 2320 South, Suite B
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
RE: work Assignment EIILR-2,Big-o rires,208 South Main, Richfield, utah
One Quarter Groundwater Sampling (Task D)
Dear Mr. Chatwin:
The Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) has completed a review of
the Work Plan Outline and Budget for one quarter groundwater monitoring (Task D, Table 2) at the
above-referenced release site, received on August 1, 1995, under contract#95-1024. Thank you for that
submittal.
The DERR is requesting Huntingdon to complete Work Assignment Number EHLR-2 under
contract #95-1024, as per your August I proposal. A copy ofthat proposal is attached for your reference.
The amount budgeted is $2,810.06. Please sign both copies of the work assignment signature page and
return a copy to the DERR. If you have any questions concerning the enclosed work assignment, please
contact Kate Johnson, rhe DERR project manager, at (801) 53G4LZO.
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
BDWKET/jf
Enclosure(s)
cc: Kate Johnson, Contract Officer, DERR
Earl Conroy, Accounting, DERR
Printed on recycled pap€r
v
EIILR.2
Big-O fires, Richfreld' Utah
One Quarter Groundwater Monitoring
Approved-as-submitted by Huntingdon, as shown in agachment, Table 2, Task D.'!Ifrnn -? r?"?
Hrq'Apflortd&p ?.\
uDERR Project ru*ue", \,(fi)^Srl,ult\.r* oarc: ?' 4''i {
U
TJDERR Contract Administrator \ I' A+J)-(k1l 1l.4-\f,IL Da,te:7)
LUST Section Manager Y,*( /L ) Darts:
Datc:-
:
STATE OF UTAH
DEPARTMENT OT' EI.IYIRONMEI{TAL QUALITY
DTWSION OF ENWRONMENTAL RFSPONSE AT'ID REMEDIATION
168 North 1950 West, lst Floor
Salt Lake Citv, tIT 84116
(801) -<36-4100
FAX NLMBER (801) 359.8E53
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE:\\-L-rr
TO:
AGFNCYiFIRM:
FAX NT]MBER:
FRoM: ?I) - qSSl
PAGES ro FOLL owz L
A,
STATE OF IJTATI
DEPARTMm.IT Or EDnTRONMET{TAL QUALTTY
DrWSION OI| EIWIRONMEI.ITAL RESPONSE AI\ID REIVIEDTA*UON
168 North 1950 West, Ist Floor
Salt Lake City, Uf E4116
(801) 536*1100
FAX NT]MBER (EOl) 359.EE53
rAX CO\MR SHEET
:
oars, 81/{, -1f
.(
ffila.-,-
AGEI{CY/FIRMT lftoxt.&.*-z
FAxNuMBm; qYZ* rySS 5L
PAGES TO FOLLOW:
?<
di,l **" ii )'r:
BLOCK RETAINING WALL
o\
MW-1A
93.65)
/-AsPHNt -J
\
'orio
MW-2 '-ll(e3.02) O o
LEGENDo+
MONITOTiINC Wt II
VAPOR EXTRACIION WELL
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
CONTOUR DASHED WHERE
INFERRED
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
NOT MEASURED
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
I2.OOO GAL UST (s3.02)
+
(
ves-\1
$
MW-
, (sJ.3Qo\ES-2
-1
5
1)
HOUSE
OVERHEAD
ELECTRIC &
lELEPHONE
VES-4 I 3o+ \!-:"-r-IBdr*.MW-4 +94.00)
;
I
I
&
frJr.i
tr
b.r
V)
n
s
STORM
SEIIER
INLET
j
I
(o
.Cv
O --w
3OO SOUTH
o
MW-6
(s2.4s)o
MW-5
(s1.88) ---N HOUSE HOUSE
CASH SA\ER GAS STANON
Figurel I SouthlondUnit
Grou:ndnuater Contour No. 22576
1i"p -' ---" | 285 S. Moin St.
Mo.g 18, t 995 | Richfield, Utoh
STORE
1122576
*
CONCREIE
PARKING
4-r'^T"'
----1. rFl
,J,XIB, \:t6
/\ _--_TEl-,._1 \Gl i
puMP L,u,ts oo I
-1,ISLANDS ExcAvAT]oN _-/ I
)
SECOR
4001 South 700 Eost
Suite 250
Solt Loke City, Utoh 84107
WN
ATE
N0.T0999-047- 41
^
oloI
(o
o
o
o
Y
o
t
zz
z
a
z
=c
o
F
L
.
r
x
l
:
ilo
o
+U
No
(
o
o
u
l
oz
N
t
-
+
6F
t
J
x
r
;
oE
II
o
o9
o
z
az
.
L.
l
E
o_
o-
IrO
'.

z.
IF
(,I=
FF5olnaaor
j
IIIIIIIIIIII:IIIIIIoIIIIIIIIIIoII
",
-
.
/
k
*
-
a
l
J
J
a
=
-
b*
E
#
-
'l
l

.
E
o3
u
<z
-u
o
o
ct
I
U
Ui
\
u
A
>Y
,
J
l
o'
i
u
o
ii
F
I
ooo{o,
Io-F
EdFF=>
(o
IU'g(,IoE>E5E
E
)
Jt
-L
.
L!

!Y
3d
L-
-
L
Lr
J

'-
A<
6Lzt
-
OZ
FO<O
E.F>
z.
)
!,
1

>
9=
^<
()
2
tt,
iFoz.
-oaCL
z.oco
^v
.
3<
o-
c
)
o-
o
7L=oY>
-
FTq>
'-
l
fi
u
4

^
O6
E
C
Zt
r
l
-
u
,
()

t-
l

tr
J

=
^
l-
2
r,
,
r
*
t
-
.
t
{
z
)o
a
U<
,
'L
F
-
!b
o
o
x
t-

z.
z
tr
l
t
l
l
l
q
oo
o
o
o
El
r
+
f
f
i
z
s
Lr
{

o-
JF
So
o
o
f
-
tZ
.
Z
Z
O
-
-oo-e
Gc
6
o-

oF
99
#
a
06
=
-=

EE
E
E-
t
-
z
1?

zz
8
s?

22
v
.^

v
oo
E
S2

F
OO
N
z-
>
4
2
y
u
t!
L
r
J
t
t
0
o.

z,
-
=
-
'
'-
-

C)

r.
.
:
5
I
<
o_

zl
r
U
<
UI
O
F
rl
>=
_
=
_
=
_
=
-
OS
c
o

r-

tJ

x
I
))=ozFEYooDI
U@5h
ir
*
*=
-
J
i
r
O?q
3
R
3
*-
-
-
n
X'
l
V
,
l
\
3
O
l
S
No
o
o
o
o

Po
lz
z
.
z
z
.
z

V.
=
=c
B
F
L
r
x
r

Ef
\a
l
\
,)
,
.
\e
7,
e+
IIFJIcat
E"
q

ee
p
\
.
1

\+
[
-.
;
;
t

i
rE

Y
4x
JU
.r
A
'!

\t
t9
<
,=
x
I
\L)>
/)
./
L
r_
t
r

!(v)
,*
!

(
>z
l<
F0lJ(,oooci
tsEozoo
J,
r
zoFFaooEIoI6o
I;S
S

-
Jg
f
r
A
J
S

NI
Y
I
T
Table 2
Cumulative Groundwater Sample Analytical Results
7-Eleven Store No. 22576
285 South Main Street
Richfield. Utah
WellNo.Date TPH.,
ilzs{.I1.}
BTEXbCompq*ds' ,' 'U.{rj ,,,
i:1a,.',,t:.:,a.ai:,jl
B6nze{q,l Toluene [thylbenztne::,,., ..1.::.:a.,,a::.:i::rl:.a:a:a:.
t;.;..; i,;t;"roEar ,xv*
MW-l
\4W-l A
06t28t91
09t29t94
12108t94
02127/95
05/1 8/9s
39
34
14
15
l5
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
1.0
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0 50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.7'7
MW-2 06t28t94
09t29/91
12t08t94
02t2'7195
05/r 8/95
<10
<10
<10
N.r
<10
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
NS
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
rVS
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<().50
,\is
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.5
N.S
<0.50
MW-3 06t28t94
09t29194
t2/08t94
02t21t95
05/r 8/95
r8.000
16.000
r6.000
r3.000
9.200
2,200
2,400
2,900
1,500
I,100
<250
250
r90
240
r90
440
280
320
260
1'70
1.600
910
r,000
750
360
\,tw-.+06t28t94
09t29t94
12t08t91
02t2'il95
05/ I 8/95
:10
230
170
rVS
180
2.1
I .'7
1.0
NS
8.8
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
NS
<0.50
t2
l1
4.9
NS
2.0
5.3
4.2
<0.50
NS
0.98
NIW.5 06t28t94
09t29t94
t2t08t94
02t2'7 t95
05/l 8/95
4.200
9s0
4.700
6.400
4.900
5l
8.3
56
170
92
42
t2
25
58
<12
_120
68
190
220
260
170
40
95
65
70
MW-6 06128t94
09t29t94
1A08t94
02t27t95
05/l 8/95
NS
46
380
840
<10
NS
<0.50
<2.0
<2.5
<0.50
NS
1.4
<2.0
19
<0.50
NS
1.5
6.3
14
<0.50
NS
0.72
<2.0
<2.5
0.60
Federal and Utah MCU NE"5 1.000 700 10,000
a pEA = Micrograms per liter = pars per billion
b BTEX = benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes
c NS = not sampled
d MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
sEcorq Projccr No. T(] 99-(141-41 22576qm295
beyorul rhe sDecific tcope or intent of its usc wirhout cxpress vrifrcn couant of SECOR lemotional IncorJnroted.
.,I rh-
REMEDIATION
I c$r
Michael O. [ravitt
Govcrnor
Dianne R. Nielson, Ph.D.
Executivc Direcror
Kent P. Gray
Dirrctor
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE AND
168 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144840
Salt l-ake City, Utah 84114-4840
[phone] Voice
[phone] Fax
(801) s36-1-ll4 T.D.D.
ERRL-1267-95
December 6,1995
Terry Chatwin
Maxim Technologies, Inc.
1127 West 2320 South, Suite B
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Work Assignment Amendment #EHLR-2.A for three additional quarters of groundwater
monitoring at Big-O Tire, 208 S. Main, Richfield, Utah
Facility I.if@fDlelease Site EHLR.
Dear Mr. Chatwin:
The Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) has completed its review of
Maxim's request for a Work Assignment Amendment to Work Assignment Number EHLR-2 under
contract #95-1024, due to the need for obtaining three additional quarters of groundwater monitoring data.
These changes were necessary due to the implementation of a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) feasibility
study at a nearby site and the need for additional groundwater data at Big-O Tire.
The enclosed Work Assignment Amendment # EHLR-2.A hereby formally approves a change in
the scope of work, and a corresponding increase in the approved budget with an additional amended cost
of $8,430.18. The amended total approved budget is now $11,240.24. If you have any questions
concerning the Work Assignment Amendment #EHLR-2.A, please call Kate Johnson, the DERR Project
Manager, at [phone].
Sincerely,
C._,_*Q /,JH*
/
Bryan D. Whilaker, UST Branch Manager
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
KPG/IGJ/cjl
Enclosure
Kate Johnson, DERR
Earl Conroy, DERR
Re:
Printed on recycled paper
\-' \-/
WORK ASSIGI{MENT AMENDMENT # EHLR.2.A
95-t024
Change in Scope of Work at Big-O Tire
208 South Main, Richfield, Utah
The contractor (Maxim) is requested to complete the following items as Work Assignment Amendment #
EHLR-2.A. These changes were necessary due to the need to monitor groundwater conditions while a CAP
feasibility study is underway at Grand Western Gas and Groceries. The results of the CAP feasibility Study,
combined with the results of the groundwater monitoring at Big-O, will be used to decide the direction of
corrective action at Big-O.
The following changes are hereby made to Work Assignment # EHLR-2, which was originally approved by
the DERR on August 8, 1995 and mailed on August 8, 1995.
1. Three additional quarters of gtoundwater monitoring.
Justification: The original approval of one quarter was insufficient for the scope of work presented by the
site.
Amended Budget: $2,810.06 per quarter for three quarters. Total amended budget is $11,240.24.
Contract #
Re:
Approved by:
UDERR Project Manager
UDERR Contract Offrcer
UDERR Section Manager
State Contractor:
Darc: li'i-ii
Date: lt4 '11'
//
Date: tt/'t /-; :
^
,^
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE AND
168 Nonh 1950 West
P.O. Box 144840
Salt lake City. Utah 841l4-4840
[phone] Voice
[phone] Fax
[phone] T.D.D.
REMEDIATION
FIL E $ftPV
5 tRe
#Yvso I
Michael O. Leavitt
Govcmor
Dianne R. Nielson, Ph.D.
Exeutivc Dircctr
Kent P. Gray
Direior
Printed on recrded papor
ERRL-1267-95
December 6,1995
Terry Chatwin
Maxim Technologies, Inc.
ll27 West 2320 South, Suite B
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Re: Work Assignment Amendment #EHLR-2.A for three additional quarters of groundwater
monitoring at Big-O Tire, 208 S. Main, Richfield, Utah
Facility 1.D.2W0326, Release Site EHLR.
Dear Mr. Chatwin:
The Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) has completed its review of
Maxim's request for a Work Assignment Amendment to Work Assignment Number EHLR-2 under
contract #95-1024, due to the need for obtaining three additional quarters of groundwater monitoring data.
These changes were necessary due to the implementation of a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) feasibility
study at a nearby site and the need for additional groundwater data at Big-O Tire.
The enclosed Work Assignment Amendment # EHLR-2.A hereby formally approves a change in
the scope of work, and a corresponding increase in the approved budget with an additional amended cost
of $8,430.18. The amended total approved budget is now $1.1.,240.24. If you have any questions
concerning the Work Assignment Amendment #EHLR-2.A, please call Kate Johnson, the DERR Project
Manager, at [phone].
Sincerely,
L-*'Q nl.H*-
/
Bryan D. Whitaker, UST Branch Manager
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
KPG/KEI/cjl
Enclosure
cc: Kate Johnson, DERR
, Earl Conroi, DERR
\-, \-,
WORK ASSIGNMENT AMENDMENT # EHLR.2.A
95-t024
Change in Scope of Work at Big-O Tire
208 South Main. Richfield. Utah
The contractor (Maxim) is requested to complete the following items as Work Assignment Amendment #
EHi- .-2.A. These changes were necessary due to the need to monitor groundwater conditions while a CAP
fea-.. .:iry srudy is urde:-.vay at Grand Western Gas and Groceries. The results of the CAP feasibiliry Study,
combined with the results of the groundwater monitoring at Big-O, will be used to decide the direction of
corrective action at Big-O.
The following changes are hereby made to Work Assignment # EHLR-2, which was originally approved by
the DERR on August 8, 1995 and mailed on August 8' 1995.
1. Three additional quarters of groundwater monitoring.
Justification: The original approval of one quarter was insufficient for the scope of work presented by the
site.
Amended Budget: $2.810.06 per quarter for three quarters. Total amended budget is $11.240.24'
Contract #
Re:
Approved by:
UDERR Project Manager
UDERR Contract Officer
UDERR Section Manager
State Contractor:
,---/
Date: lt "t'l >
,ur".G*)r-
/,t
Date: /,'/4 y';i
Date:
WTECHNOLOGIES INC
t
1
Ii(
I
i
:-J
*lfffitt &REi'uEDrAirci'
ii'r1EneD-*. - , i
December 7, 1995
Mr. Bryan D. Whitaker, Manager
STATE OF UTAH
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
168 North 1950 West lst Floor
Salt I-ake City, Utah 84114-4840
Re: Work Assignment Amendment #EHLR-2.A for three additional quarters of
groundw,Ug at Big-O Tire, 208 S. Main, Richfield, Utah;
Facility 326, Bblease Site EHLR.
Dear Mr. Whitaker:
Enclosed is one signed copy of the above referenced Work Assignment Amendment No. EHLR-
2.A, under contract #95-1024. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
MAXIM TECHNOLOGIBS, INC.
Senior Project Manager
TDC:dr
Enclosure
EHLR-2.A.Wrk
lL27 W. 2320 5., S," B 87 c 8Ot-9724552 FAX
Asteco.AustinResearchEngineerso Chen-Northern. EmpireSoilslnvestigationso Huntingdon. KansasCityTesting
MaximEngineers r NebraskaTesting o PatzigTesting. SouthwesternLaboratories o Thomas-Hartig o 1*lnOityTesting
J,aa!l'
DERR
DEC I ls
in, P.E., Ph.D.
WORK ASSIGNMENT AMENDMENT # EIILR.2.A
95-102,1
Change in Scope of Work at Big-O Tire
208 South Main, Richfield, Utah
The confractor (Maxim) is requested to complete the following items as Work Assignment Amendment #
EHLR-2.A. These changes were necessary due to the need to monitor groundwater conditions while a CAP
feasibility study is urderway at Grand Western Gas and Groceries. The results of the CAP feasibility Study,
combined with the results of the groundwater monitoring at Big-O, will be used to decide the direction of
corrective action at Big-O.
The following changes are hereby made to Work Assignment # EHLR-2, which was originally approved by
the DERR on August 8, 1995 and mailed on August 8, 1995.
1. Three additional quarters of groundwater monitoring.
Justification:The original approval of one quarter was insufficient for the scope of work presented by the
site.
Amended Budget: $2,810.06 per quarter for three quarters. Total amended budget is $11,V10.24.
Contract #
Re:
Approved by:
UDERR Project Manager
UDERR Contract Officer
UDERR Section Manager
State Contractor:
out", ll'A'l f
Date: ll4 -1f
D^t., //Zfrr