DAQ-2025-001832

DAQE-AN148620004-25

{{$d1 }}

Justin Ray
Price River Terminal, LLC
1300 Main Street
Houston, TX 77002
[e-mail]

Dear Mr. Ray:

Re: Approval Order: Modification to Approval Order DAQE-AN148620003-20 to Increase
Transloading Limits and Add a Storage Tank
Project Number: N148620004

The attached Approval Order (AO) is issued pursuant to the Notice of Intent (NOI) received on
September 26, 2023. Price River Terminal, LLC must comply with the requirements of this AO, all
applicable state requirements (R307), and Federal Standards.

The project engineer for this action is Dylan Frederick, who can be contacted at [phone] or
[e-mail]. Future correspondence on this AO should include the engineer's name as well as
the DAQE number shown on the upper right-hand corner of this letter. No public comments were
received on this action.

Sincerely,

{{$s }}

Bryce C. Bird
Director

BCB:DF:jg

cc: Southeastern Utah District Health Department

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX
Governor
DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor

Department of
Environmental Quality

Tim Davis
Interim Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird
Director

March 27, 2025

STATE OF UTAH
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality

{{#s=Sig_es_:signer1:signature}}
{{#d1=date1_es_:signer1:date:format(date, "mmmm d, yyyy")}}
{{#d2=date1_es_:signer1:date:format(date, "mmmm d, yyyy"):align(center)}}

APPROVAL ORDER
DAQE-AN148620004-25
Modification to Approval Order DAQE-AN148620003-20 to
Increase Transloading Limits and Add a Storage Tank

Prepared By
Dylan Frederick, Engineer
[phone]
[e-mail]

Issued to
Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility

Issued On
{{$d2 }}

Issued By

{{$s }}

Bryce C. Bird
Director
Division of Air Quality

March 27, 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE/SIGNATURE PAGE ....................................................................................................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION ...................................................................................................... 3
CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION ............................................................................... 3
SOURCE INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 3
General Description ................................................................................................................ 3
NSR Classification .................................................................................................................. 3
Source Classification .............................................................................................................. 3
Applicable Federal Standards ................................................................................................. 3
Project Description.................................................................................................................. 4
SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS .................................................................................................... 4
SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS .................................................................................... 4
SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT .............................................................................. 5
SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS ..................................................................................... 6
PERMIT HISTORY ..................................................................................................................... 9
ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... 10

DAQE-AN148620004-25
Page 3

GENERAL INFORMATION

CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION

Owner Name Source Name
Price River Terminal, LLC Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility

Mailing Address Physical Address
1300 Main Street
Houston, TX 77002 6000 East Wash Plant Road
Wellington, UT 84542

Source Contact UTM Coordinates
Name: Justin Ray 525,464 m Easting
Phone: [phone],375,301 m Northing
Email: [e-mail] Datum NAD83
UTM Zone 12
SIC code 4226 (Special Warehousing & Storage, NEC)

SOURCE INFORMATION
General Description
Price River Terminal, LLC (PRT) operates a transloading facility. The facility transfers crude oil from
tanker trucks to oil storage tanks and then to railcars, which are shipped to various crude oil refineries
throughout the United States. PRT also has the ability to load crude oil directly from tanker trucks to
railcars. Railcars are filled and stored on-site until approximately 90 railcars have been filled. The railcars
are then connected to a locomotive engine and transported via rail to customers.

NSR Classification
Minor Modification at Minor Source

Source Classification
Located in Attainment Area
Carbon County
Airs Source Size: B

Applicable Federal Standards
NSPS (Part 60), A: General Provisions
NSPS (Part 60), Kb: Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels
(Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or
Modification Commenced After July 23, 1984
NSPS (Part 60), Kc: Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels
DAQE-AN148620004-25
Page 4

Project Description
PRT requested approval to install and operate a new liquid storage tank and natural gas-fired heater, as
well as increase the daily limit on crude oil transloading. The storage tank has a capacity of 120,000
barrels, and the tank heater is rated at 4 MMBtu per hour and will be operated at 8,760 hours per year.
PRT has requested to increase the annual limits of crude oil transloaded through the storage tanks from
14,600,000 barrels to 43,800,000 barrels and to decrease the annual limit of crude oil transloaded through
mobile operations from 10,400,000 barrels to 3,650,000 barrels. This is the equivalent of 120,000 barrels
transloaded through storage tanks daily and an additional 10,000 barrels transloaded through mobile
operations daily.

SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS

The emissions listed below are an estimate of the total potential emissions from the source. Some
rounding of emissions is possible.

Criteria Pollutant Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
CO2 Equivalent 1083.74 43658.00
Carbon Monoxide 1.80 62.33
Nitrogen Oxides 2.14 24.56
Particulate Matter - PM10 -7.31 4.55
Particulate Matter - PM2.5 -3.36 1.18
Sulfur Dioxide 0.02 0.34
Volatile Organic Compounds 47.72 80.56

Hazardous Air Pollutant Change (lbs/yr) Total (lbs/yr)
Generic HAPs (CAS #GHAPS) -370 62
Hexane (CAS #110543) 1080
Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
Total HAPs 0.35 0.57

SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS

I.1 All definitions, terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in the UAC R307 and 40 CFR. Unless noted otherwise, references cited in these AO conditions refer to those rules. [R307-101] I.2 The limits set forth in this AO shall not be exceeded without prior approval. [R307-401]
I.3 Modifications to the equipment or processes approved by this AO that could affect the emissions covered by this AO must be reviewed and approved. [R307-401-1] I.4 All records referenced in this AO or in other applicable rules, which are required to be kept by the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Director or Director's representative upon request, and the records shall include the two-year period prior to the date of the request. Unless otherwise specified in this AO or in other applicable state and federal rules, records shall be kept for a minimum of two years. [R307-401-8]
DAQE-AN148620004-25
Page 5

I.5 At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners and operators shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any equipment approved under this AO, including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations, review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source. All maintenance performed on equipment authorized by this AO shall be recorded. [R307-401-4] I.6 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-107. General Requirements: Breakdowns. [R307-107]

I.7 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-150 Series. Emission Inventories. [R307-150]
I.8 The owner/operator shall submit documentation of the status of construction or modification to the Director within 18 months from the date of this AO. This AO may become invalid if
construction is not commenced within 18 months from the date of this AO or if construction is
discontinued for 18 months or more. To ensure proper credit when notifying the Director, send the documentation to the Director, attn.: NSR Section. [R307-401-18]

SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT
II.A THE APPROVED EQUIPMENT
II.A.1 Crude Oil Transloading Facility II.A.2 Three Oil Storage Tanks (one NEW) Maximum Capacities: one 88,300 bbl and two 120,000 bbl Tank VOC Control Type: Floating Roofs
II.A.3 One Flare Maximum Capacity: 0.48 MMBTU/hr Contains: Blower Control Efficiency: 98% Controls: Transloading activities to railcars II.A.4 Five Adsorption Units Maximum Flowrate: 150 acfm Equipped with a breakthrough monitor Controls: Direct Transloading from trucks to railcars
II.A.5 Three Tank Heaters (one NEW) Maximum Rated Capacity: less than 5 MMBtu/hr each Fuel: Natural Gas II.A.6 One Diesel Storage Tank* Maximum Tank Capacity: 1,000 gallons *Tank is noted for informational purposes only.
II.A.7 One Gasoline Storage Tank* Maximum Tank Capacity: 500 gallons *Tank is noted for informational purposes only.
DAQE-AN148620004-25
Page 6

II.A.8 Loading/Unloading Racks Controls: Fixed transloading - Flare Mobile transloading - Carbon adsorption units

SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS II.B REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS
II.B.1 Site-Wide Requirements
II.B.1.a The owner/operator shall not exceed the following processing limitations: A. 43,800,000 barrels (bbls) of crude oil processed through the oil storage tanks and transloaded to railcars per rolling 12-month period B. 3,650,000 bbls of crude oil transloaded to railcars through mobile operations per rolling 12-month period. [R307-401-8]
II.B.1.a.1 The owner/operator shall:
A. Calculate a new 12-month total by the 20th day of each month using data from the
previous 12 months
B. Determine site-wide crude oil transloading by examination of company and/or
customer billing records
C. Keep records of tank versus mobile crude oil railcar loading individually on a daily
basis
D. Keep transloading records for all periods the plant is in operation.

[R307-401-8]
II.B.1.b The owner/operator shall control VOC emissions during rail car loading operations from storage tanks at all times by using a vapor capture line. The vapor capture line shall be connected from the railcar loading operations to the flare. [R307-401-8]
II.B.1.c The owner/operator shall route all emissions from all direct mobile loading to railcar operations
to a carbon adsorption drum prior to exhausting the air to the atmosphere. [R307-401-8]
II.B.1.d The owner/operators shall replace the carbon in the affected adsorber drum upon activation of the breakthrough monitor. [R307-401-8]
II.B.1.e The owner/operator shall:
A. Replace the carbon in each adsorber drum at a minimum of once annually
B. Keep records of adsorber drum carbon replacement and maintain the records onsite. [R307-401-8]
II.B.1.f Unless otherwise specified in this AO, the owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any stationary point or fugitive emission source on site to exceed 10% opacity. [R307-401-8]
DAQE-AN148620004-25
Page 7

II.B.1.f.1 Opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted while in operation in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. [R307-401-8] II.B.1.g The owner/operator shall only use natural gas as fuel in the storage tank heaters. [R307-401-8]
II.B.2 Tank Requirements
II.B.2.a The owner/operator shall load the railcars and storage tanks on-site by the use of bottom filling or a submerged fill pipe. [R307-401-8]
II.B.2.b The owner/operator shall keep the storage tank thief hatches and other tank openings closed and sealed except during tank unloading or other maintenance activities. [R307-401-8] II.B.2.c The owner/operator shall conduct visual inspections of each internal floating roof storage tank
according to the methods and procedures specified in 40 CFR 60.113b(a). [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb]

II.B.2.c.1 The owner/operator shall keep and maintain records of initial visual inspections of each internal floating roof storage tank for the life of the equipment. [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb]
II.B.3 Flare Requirements
II.B.3.a The owner/operator shall not allow any visible emissions from the flare. [R307-401-8] II.B.3.a.1 Visual determination of smoke emissions from flares shall be conducted according to 40 CFR 60,
Appendix A, Method 22. [R307-401-8]

II.B.3.b The flare shall operate with a continuous pilot flame and be equipped with an auto-igniter. [R307-401-8]
II.B.3.c The owner/operator shall install a flare that is certified to meet a VOC control efficiency of no less than 98%. [R307-401-8]

II.B.3.c.1 To demonstrate compliance with the above condition, the owner/operator shall maintain records of the manufacturer's emissions guarantee for the installed flare. [R307-401-8]
II.B.4 Fugitive Dust Requirements
II.B.4.a The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from haul roads, terminal access roads, and mobile equipment in operational areas to exceed 20% opacity. [R307-205]
II.B.4.a.1 Visible emission determinations for fugitive dust from haul-road traffic and mobile equipment
areas shall use procedures similar to Method 9. The normal requirement for observations to be made at 15-second intervals over a six-minute period, however, shall not apply. Visible
emissions shall be measured at the densest point of the plume but at a point not less than 1/2
vehicle length behind the vehicle and not less than 1/2 the height of the vehicle. [R307-205]
II.B.4.b The owner/operator shall pave all haul roads associated with the Price River Oil Transloading Facility. [R307-401-8]
II.B.4.c The owner/operator shall vacuum sweep and flush with water all the paved haul roads on site to
maintain the opacity limit listed in this AO. The owner/operator shall use an operational vacuum
sweeper and water truck to conduct the required vacuum sweeping and watering. The
owner/operator may stop flushing the paved haul roads with water when the temperature is below
freezing but shall apply other controls as necessary to prevent visible emissions from exceeding
the opacity limits listed in this AO. The owner/operator may stop vacuum sweeping the paved
haul roads when the haul roads are covered with snow or ice. [R307-401-8]

DAQE-AN148620004-25
Page 8

II.B.4.c.1 Records of vacuum sweeping and water application shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. The records shall include the following items: A. Date and time vacuum sweeping and water application were made B. Number of vacuum sweeping and water application made and quantity of water applied C. Rainfall amount received, if any D. Records of temperature, if the temperature was below freezing E. Records of any other control used to reduce fugitive dust. [R307-401-8] II.B.5 Monitoring Requirements of Fugitive Emissions (Leak Detection and Repair)
II.B.5.a The owner/operator shall develop a fugitive emissions monitoring plan for the storage tanks and flare operations. At a minimum, the plan shall include: A. Monitoring frequency B. Monitoring technique and equipment C. Procedures and timeframes for identifying and repairing leaks D. Recordkeeping practices E. Calibration and maintenance procedures. [R307-401-8] II.B.5.b The owner/operator shall conduct monitoring surveys on-site to observe each "fugitive emissions
component" for "fugitive emissions."
A. "Fugitive emissions component" means any component that has the potential to emit
fugitive emissions of VOC, including but not limited to valves, connectors, pressure
relief devices, open-ended lines, flanges, covers, and closed vent systems, thief hatches or other openings, instruments, and meters

B. "Fugitive emissions" are considered any visible emissions observed using optical gas imaging or a Method 21 instrument reading of 500 ppm or greater.

[R307-401-8]
II.B.5.b.1 Monitoring surveys shall be conducted according to the following schedule: A. No later than 90 days after startup or 180 days from the date of this AO B. Annually after the initial leak detection inspection. [R307-401-8]
DAQE-AN148620004-25
Page 9

II.B.5.b.2 Monitoring surveys shall be conducted using one or both of the following to detect fugitive emissions: A. Optical gas imaging (OGI) equipment. OGI equipment shall be capable of imaging gases in the spectral range for the compound of highest concentration in the potential fugitive emissions. B. Monitoring equipment that meets U.S. EPA Method 21, 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. [R307-401-8]
II.B.5.c If fugitive emissions are detected at any time, the owner/operator shall repair the fugitive emissions component as soon as possible but no later than 15 calendar days after detection.
If the repair or replacement is technically infeasible, or would be unsafe to repair during operation of the unit, the repair or replacement must be completed during the next shutdown, or
within 24 months, whichever is earlier. [R307-401-8]

II.B.5.c.1 The owner/operator shall resurvey the repaired or replaced fugitive emissions component no later than 30 calendar days after the fugitive emissions component was repaired. [R307-401-8]
II.B.5.d The owner/operator shall maintain records of the fugitive emissions monitoring plan, monitoring surveys, repairs, and resurveys. [R307-401-8]

PERMIT HISTORY

This Approval Order shall supersede (if a modification) or will be based on the following documents:
Supersedes AO DAQE-AN148620003-20 dated October 21, 2020 Is Derived From NOI dated September 26, 2023 Incorporates Additional Information dated November 27, 2023 Incorporates Additional Information dated May 1, 2024 Incorporates Additional Information dated August 14, 2024 Incorporates Additional Information dated August 28, 2024 Incorporates Additional Information dated October 18, 2024 Incorporates Additional Information dated October 30, 2024
DAQE-AN148620004-25
Page 10

ACRONYMS

The following lists commonly used acronyms and associated translations as they apply to this document:

40 CFR Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
AO Approval Order
BACT Best Available Control Technology
CAA Clean Air Act
CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments
CDS Classification Data System (used by Environmental Protection Agency to classify
sources by size/type)
CEM Continuous emissions monitor
CEMS Continuous emissions monitoring system
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CMS Continuous monitoring system
CO Carbon monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 98,
Subpart A, Table A-1
COM Continuous opacity monitor
DAQ/UDAQ Division of Air Quality
DAQE This is a document tracking code for internal Division of Air Quality use
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FDCP Fugitive dust control plan
GHG Greenhouse Gas(es) - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations 52.21 (b)(49)(i)
GWP Global Warming Potential - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 86.1818-
12(a)
HAP or HAPs Hazardous air pollutant(s)
ITA Intent to Approve
LB/YR Pounds per year MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology MMBTU Million British Thermal Units NAA Nonattainment Area NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants NOI Notice of Intent
NOx Oxides of nitrogen
NSPS New Source Performance Standard
NSR New Source Review
PM10 Particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PM2.5 Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size
PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration
PTE Potential to Emit
R307 Rules Series 307
R307-401 Rules Series 307 - Section 401
SO2 Sulfur dioxide
Title IV Title IV of the Clean Air Act
Title V Title V of the Clean Air Act
TPY Tons per year
UAC Utah Administrative Code
VOC Volatile organic compounds

DAQE-IN148620004-25

February 13, 2025

Justin Ray
Price River Terminal, LLC
1300 Main Street
Houston, TX 77002
[e-mail]

Dear Mr. Ray:

Re: Intent to Approve: Modification to Approval Order DAQE-AN148620003-20 to Increase
Transloading Limits and Add a Storage Tank
Project Number: N148620004

The attached document is the Intent to Approve (ITA) for the above-referenced project. The ITA is
subject to public review. Any comments received shall be considered before an Approval Order (AO) is
issued. The Division of Air Quality is authorized to charge a fee for reimbursement of the actual costs
incurred in the issuance of an AO. An invoice will follow upon issuance of the final AO.

Future correspondence on this ITA should include the engineer's name, Dylan Frederick, as well as the
DAQE number as shown on the upper right-hand corner of this letter. Dylan Frederick, can be reached at
[phone] or [e-mail], if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

{{$s }}

Alan D. Humpherys, Manager
New Source Review Section

ADH:DF:jg

cc: Southeastern Utah District Health Department

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX
Governor
DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor

Department of
Environmental Quality

Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird
Director

STATE OF UTAH
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality

INTENT TO APPROVE
DAQE-IN148620004-25
Modification to Approval Order DAQE-AN148620003-20 to
Increase Transloading Limits and Add a Storage Tank

Prepared By
Dylan Frederick, Engineer
[phone]
[e-mail]

Issued to
Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility

Issued On
February 13, 2025

{{$s }}

New Source Review Section Manager
Alan D. Humpherys
{{#s=Sig_es_:signer1:signature}}

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE/SIGNATURE PAGE ....................................................................................................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION ...................................................................................................... 3
CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION ............................................................................... 3
SOURCE INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 3
General Description ................................................................................................................ 3
NSR Classification .................................................................................................................. 3
Source Classification .............................................................................................................. 3
Applicable Federal Standards ................................................................................................. 3
Project Description.................................................................................................................. 4
SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS .................................................................................................... 4
PUBLIC NOTICE STATEMENT............................................................................................... 4
SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS .................................................................................... 5
SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT .............................................................................. 6
SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS ..................................................................................... 7
PERMIT HISTORY ................................................................................................................... 10
ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... 11

DAQE-IN148620004-25
Page 3

GENERAL INFORMATION

CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION

Owner Name Source Name
Price River Terminal, LLC Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility

Mailing Address Physical Address
1300 Main Street 6000 East Wash Plant Road
Houston, TX 77002 Wellington, UT 84542

Source Contact UTM Coordinates
Name: Justin Ray 525,464 m Easting
Phone: [phone],375,301 m Northing
Email: [e-mail] Datum NAD83
UTM Zone 12
SIC code 4226 (Special Warehousing & Storage, NEC)

SOURCE INFORMATION
General Description
Price River Terminal, LLC (PRT) operates a transloading facility. The facility transfers crude oil from
tanker trucks to oil storage tanks and then to railcars, which are shipped to various crude oil refineries
throughout the United States. PRT also has the ability to load crude oil directly from tanker trucks to
railcars. Railcars are filled and stored on-site until approximately 90 railcars have been filled. The railcars
are then connected to a locomotive engine and transported via rail to customers.
NSR Classification
Minor Modification at Minor Source

Source Classification
Located in Attainment Area
Carbon County
Airs Source Size: B

Applicable Federal Standards
NSPS (Part 60), A: General Provisions
NSPS (Part 60), Kb: Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels
(Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or
Modification Commenced After July 23, 1984
NSPS (Part 60), Kc: Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels
DAQE-IN148620004-25
Page 4

Project Description
PRT requested approval to install and operate a new liquid storage tank and natural gas-fired heater, as
well as increase the daily limit on crude oil transloading. The storage tank has a capacity of 120,000
barrels, and the tank heater is rated at 4 MMBtu per hour and will be operated at 8,760 hours per year.
PRT has requested to increase the annual limits of crude oil transloaded through the storage tanks from
14,600,000 barrels to 43,800,000 barrels and to decrease the annual limit of crude oil transloaded through
mobile operations from 10,400,000 barrels to 3,650,000 barrels. This is the equivalent of 120,000 barrels
transloaded through storage tanks daily and an additional 10,000 barrels transloaded through mobile
operations daily.

SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS

The emissions listed below are an estimate of the total potential emissions from the source. Some
rounding of emissions is possible.

Criteria Pollutant Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
CO2 Equivalent 1083.74 43658.00
Carbon Monoxide 1.80 62.33
Nitrogen Oxides 2.14 24.56
Particulate Matter - PM10 -7.31 4.55
Particulate Matter - PM2.5 -3.36 1.18
Sulfur Dioxide 0.02 0.34
Volatile Organic Compounds 47.72 80.56

Hazardous Air Pollutant Change (lbs/yr) Total (lbs/yr)
Generic HAPs (CAS #GHAPS) -370 62
Hexane (CAS #110543) 1080
Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
Total HAPs 0.35 0.57

PUBLIC NOTICE STATEMENT
The NOI for the above-referenced project has been evaluated and has been found to be consistent with the requirements of UAC R307. Air pollution producing sources and/or their air control facilities may not be constructed, installed, established, or modified prior to the issuance of an AO by the Director. A 30-day public comment period will be held in accordance with UAC R307-401-7. A notification of the intent to approve will be published in the ETV News (Emery Telcom) on February 19, 2025. During the public comment period the proposal and the evaluation of its impact on air quality will be available for the public to review and provide comment. If anyone so requests a public hearing within 15 days of publication, it will be held in accordance with UAC R307-401-7. The hearing will be held as close as practicable to the location of the source. Any comments received during the public comment period and the hearing will be evaluated. The proposed conditions of the AO may be changed as a result of the comments received.

DAQE-IN148620004-25
Page 5

SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS

The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended
conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the AO.

I.1 All definitions, terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in the UAC R307 and 40 CFR. Unless noted otherwise, references cited in these AO conditions refer to those rules. [R307-101]
I.2 The limits set forth in this AO shall not be exceeded without prior approval. [R307-401]

I.3 Modifications to the equipment or processes approved by this AO that could affect the emissions covered by this AO must be reviewed and approved. [R307-401-1]
I.4 All records referenced in this AO or in other applicable rules, which are required to be kept by
the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Director or Director's representative upon request, and the records shall include the two-year period prior to the date of the request.
Unless otherwise specified in this AO or in other applicable state and federal rules, records
shall be kept for a minimum of two (2) years. [R307-401-8]
I.5 At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners and operators shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any equipment approved under this AO, including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations, review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source. All maintenance performed on equipment authorized by this AO shall be recorded. [R307-401-4]
I.6 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-107. General Requirements: Breakdowns.
[R307-107]
I.7 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-150 Series. Emission Inventories. [R307-150]
I.8 The owner/operator shall submit documentation of the status of construction or modification to the Director within 18 months from the date of this AO. This AO may become invalid if
construction is not commenced within 18 months from the date of this AO or if construction is
discontinued for 18 months or more. To ensure proper credit when notifying the Director, send the documentation to the Director, attn.: NSR Section. [R307-401-18]

DAQE-IN148620004-25
Page 6

SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT

The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended
conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the AO.
II.A THE APPROVED EQUIPMENT II.A.1 Crude Oil Transloading Facility
II.A.2 Three (3) Oil Storage Tanks (1 New) Maximum Capacities: one (1) 88,300 bbl, and two (2) 120,000 bbl (one NEW) Tank VOC Control Type: Floating Roofs II.A.3 One (1) Flare Maximum Capacity: 0.48 MMBTU/hr Contains: Blower Control Efficiency: 98% Controls: Transloading activities to railcars
II.A.4 Five (5) Adsorption Units Maximum Flowrate: 150 acfm Equipped with a breakthrough monitor Controls: Direct Transloading from trucks to railcars II.A.5 Three (3) Tank Heaters Maximum Rated Capacity: less than 5 MMBtu/hr each Fuel: Natural Gas
II.A.6 One (1) Diesel Storage Tank* Maximum Tank Capacity: 1,000 gallons *Tank is noted for informational purposes only. II.A.7 One (1) Gasoline Storage Tank* Maximum Tank Capacity: 500 gallons *Tank is noted for informational purposes only.
II.A.8 Loading/Unloading Racks Controls: Fixed transloading - Flare Mobile transloading - Carbon adsorption units

DAQE-IN148620004-25
Page 7

SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS

The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended
conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the AO. II.B REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS II.B.1 Site-Wide Requirements
II.B.1.a The owner/operator shall not exceed the following processing limitations: A. 43,800,000 barrels (bbls) of crude oil processed through the oil storage tanks and transloaded to railcars per rolling 12-month period B. 3,650,000 bbls of crude oil transloaded to railcars through mobile operations per rolling 12-month period. [R307-401-8] II.B.1.a.1 The owner/operator shall: A. Calculate a new 12-month total by the 20th day of each month using data from the previous 12 months B. Determine site-wide crude oil transloading by examination of company and/or customer billing records C. Keep records of tank versus mobile crude oil railcar loading individually on a daily basis D. Keep transloading records for all periods the plant is in operation. [R307-401-8]
II.B.1.b The owner/operator shall control VOC emissions during rail car loading operations from storage tanks at all times by using a vapor capture line. The vapor capture line shall be connected from the rail car loading operations to the flare. [R307-401-8] II.B.1.c The owner/operator shall route all emissions from all direct mobile loading to railcar operations to a carbon adsorption drum prior to exhausting the air to the atmosphere. [R307-401-8]
II.B.1.d The owner/operators shall replace the carbon in the affected adsorber drum upon activation of the breakthrough monitor. [R307-401-8] II.B.1.e The owner/operator shall: A. Replace the carbon in each adsorber drum at a minimum of once annually B. Keep records of adsorber drum carbon replacement and maintain the records onsite. [R307-401-8]
II.B.1.f Unless otherwise specified in this AO, the owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any stationary point or fugitive emission source on site to exceed 10% opacity. [R307-401-8] II.B.1.f.1 Opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted while in operation in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. [R307-401-8]
DAQE-IN148620004-25
Page 8

II.B.1.g The owner/operator shall only use natural gas as fuel in the storage tank heaters. [R307-401-8]
II.B.2 Tank Requirements
II.B.2.a The owner/operator shall load the rail cars and storage tanks on site by the use of bottom filling or a submerged fill pipe. [R307-401-8]
II.B.2.b The owner/operator shall keep the storage tank thief hatches and other tank openings closed and sealed except during tank unloading or other maintenance activities. [R307-401-8]
II.B.2.c The owner/operator shall conduct visual inspections of each internal floating roof storage tank according to the methods and procedures specified in 40 CFR 60.113b(a). [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb]
II.B.2.c.1 The owner/operator shall keep and maintain records of initial visual inspections of each internal floating roof storage tank for the life of the equipment. [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb]

II.B.3 Flare Requirements
II.B.3.a The owner/operator shall not allow any visible emissions from the flare. [R307-401-8]
II.B.3.a.1 Visual determination of smoke emissions from flares shall be conducted according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 22. [R307-401-8] II.B.3.b The flare shall operate with a continuous pilot flame and be equipped with an auto-igniter.
[R307-401-8]

II.B.3.c The owner/operator shall install a flare that is certified to meet a VOC control efficiency of no less than 98%. [R307-401-8]
II.B.3.c.1 To demonstrate compliance with the above condition, the owner/operator shall maintain records of the manufacturer's emissions guarantee for the installed flare. [R307-401-8]

II.B.4 Fugitive Dust Requirements
II.B.4.a The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from haul roads, terminal access roads, and mobile equipment in operational areas to exceed 20% opacity. [R307-205]

II.B.4.a.1 Visible emission determinations for fugitive dust from haul-road traffic and mobile equipment areas shall use procedures similar to Method 9. The normal requirement for observations to be made at 15-second intervals over a six-minute period, however, shall not apply. Visible emissions shall be measured at the densest point of the plume but at a point not less than 1/2 vehicle length behind the vehicle and not less than 1/2 the height of the vehicle. [R307-205]
II.B.4.b The owner/operator shall pave all haul roads associated with the Price River Oil Transloading
Facility. [R307-401-8]
II.B.4.c The owner/operator shall vacuum, sweep, and flush with water all the paved haul roads on site to maintain the opacity limit listed in this AO. The owner/operator shall use an operational vacuum sweeper and water truck to conduct the required vacuum sweeping and watering. The owner/operator may stop flushing the paved haul roads with water when the temperature is below freezing but shall apply other controls as necessary to prevent visible emissions from exceeding the opacity limits listed in this AO. The owner/operator may stop vacuum sweeping the paved haul roads when the haul roads are covered with snow or ice. [R307-401-8]
DAQE-IN148620004-25
Page 9

II.B.4.c.1 Records of vacuum sweeping and water application shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. The records shall include the following items: A. Date and time vacuum sweeping and water application were made B. Number of vacuum sweeping and water application made and quantity of water applied C. Rainfall amount received, if any D. Records of temperature, if the temperature was below freezing E. Records of any other control used to reduce fugitive dust. [R307-401-8] II.B.5 Monitoring Requirements of Fugitive Emissions (Leak Detection and Repair)
II.B.5.a The owner/operator shall develop a fugitive emissions monitoring plan for the storage tanks and flare operations. At a minimum, the plan shall include: A. Monitoring frequency B. Monitoring technique and equipment C. Procedures and timeframes for identifying and repairing leaks D. Recordkeeping practices E. Calibration and maintenance procedures. [R307-401-8] II.B.5.b The owner/operator shall conduct monitoring surveys on site to observe each "fugitive emissions
component" for "fugitive emissions."
A. "Fugitive emissions component" means any component that has the potential to emit
fugitive emissions of VOC, including but not limited to valves, connectors, pressure
relief devices, open-ended lines, flanges, covers and closed vent systems, thief hatches or other openings, instruments, and meters

B. "Fugitive emissions" are considered any visible emissions observed using optical gas imaging or a Method 21 instrument reading of 500 ppm or greater.

[R307-401-8]
II.B.5.b.1 Monitoring surveys shall be conducted according to the following schedule: A. No later than 90 days after startup or 180 days from the date of this AO. B. Annually after the initial leak detection inspection. [R307-401-8]
DAQE-IN148620004-25
Page 10

II.B.5.b.2 Monitoring surveys shall be conducted using one or both of the following to detect fugitive emissions: A. Optical gas imaging (OGI) equipment. OGI equipment shall be capable of imaging gases in the spectral range for the compound of highest concentration in the potential fugitive emissions B. Monitoring equipment that meets U.S. EPA Method 21, 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. [R307-401-8]
II.B.5.c If fugitive emissions are detected at any time, the owner/operator shall repair the fugitive emissions component as soon as possible but no later than 15 calendar days after detection.
If the repair or replacement is technically infeasible, or would be unsafe to repair during operation of the unit, the repair or replacement must be completed during the next shutdown, or
within 24 months, whichever is earlier.
[R307-401-8]

II.B.5.c.1 The owner/operator shall resurvey the repaired or replaced fugitive emissions component no later than 30 calendar days after the fugitive emissions component was repaired. [R307-401-8]
II.B.5.d The owner/operator shall maintain records of the fugitive emissions monitoring plan, monitoring
surveys, repairs, and resurveys. [R307-401-8]

PERMIT HISTORY

This Approval Order shall supersede (if a modification) or will be based on the following documents:
Supersedes AO DAQE-AN146820003-20 dated October 21, 2020 Is Derived From NOI dated September 26, 2023 Incorporates Additional Information dated November 27, 2023 Incorporates Additional Information dated May 1, 2024 Incorporates Additional Information dated August 14, 2024 Incorporates Additional Information dated August 28, 2024 Incorporates Additional Information dated October 18, 2024 Incorporates Additional Information dated October 30, 2024
DAQE-IN148620004-25
Page 11

ACRONYMS

The following lists commonly used acronyms and associated translations as they apply to this document:

40 CFR Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
AO Approval Order
BACT Best Available Control Technology
CAA Clean Air Act
CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments
CDS Classification Data System (used by Environmental Protection Agency to classify
sources by size/type)
CEM Continuous emissions monitor
CEMS Continuous emissions monitoring system
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CMS Continuous monitoring system
CO Carbon monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 98,
Subpart A, Table A-1
COM Continuous opacity monitor
DAQ/UDAQ Division of Air Quality
DAQE This is a document tracking code for internal Division of Air Quality use
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FDCP Fugitive dust control plan
GHG Greenhouse Gas(es) - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations 52.21 (b)(49)(i)
GWP Global Warming Potential - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 86.1818-
12(a)
HAP or HAPs Hazardous air pollutant(s)
ITA Intent to Approve
LB/YR Pounds per year MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology MMBTU Million British Thermal Units NAA Nonattainment Area NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants NOI Notice of Intent
NOx Oxides of nitrogen
NSPS New Source Performance Standard
NSR New Source Review
PM10 Particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PM2.5 Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size
PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration
PTE Potential to Emit
R307 Rules Series 307
R307-401 Rules Series 307 - Section 401
SO2 Sulfur dioxide
Title IV Title IV of the Clean Air Act
Title V Title V of the Clean Air Act
TPY Tons per year
UAC Utah Administrative Code
VOC Volatile organic compounds

Jeree Greenwood <[e-mail]>
Legal Notice to be published February 19, 2025
2 messages
Jeree Greenwood <[e-mail]>Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:13 AM
To: ETV -Julie Sherman <[e-mail]>
Please publish the following notice on February 19, 2025. Also, please forward to Utahlegals.com.
If you can, please reply to this email for my confirmation.
Thank you,
Jeree
--
Jeree Greenwood
Office Technician II | Minor NSR Section
M: [phone]
airquality.utah.gov
DAQE-NN148620004-25.pdf
320K
Julie Sherman <[e-mail]>Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 2:58 PM
To: Jeree Greenwood <[e-mail]>
Hi Jeree,
I’ve got this notice placed for you in the FEB 19 paper and online and running for one week. See attached proof.
Julie
[Quoted text hidden]
*Confidentiality Notice* This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not
the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email message is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this email
message from your computer.
2/18/25, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - Legal Notice to be published February 19, 2025
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=b4fd0e1085&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-6177670750840268177&simpl=msg-a:r366882424674635…1/2
Screenshot 2025-02-15 at 2.55.28 PM.png
84K
2/18/25, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - Legal Notice to be published February 19, 2025
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=b4fd0e1085&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-6177670750840268177&simpl=msg-a:r366882424674635…2/2
Emery Telcom
Publication Name:
Emery Telcom
Publication URL:
www.etv10news.com
Publication City and State:
Price, UT
Publication County:
Carbon
Notice Popular Keyword Category:
Notice Keywords:
price river
Notice Authentication Number:
202502190952531501147
2892905420
Notice URL:
Back
Notice Publish Date:
Wednesday, February 19, 2025
Notice Content
NOTICE OF INTENT
A Notice of Intent for the following project submitted in accordance with R307-401-1, Utah Administrative Code (UAC), has been received for
consideration by the Director:
Company Name: Price River Terminal
Location: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility – 6000 East Wash Plant Road, Wellington, UT
Project Description: Price River Terminal, LLC has requested to install and operate a new 120,000 barrel storage tank and 4MMBtu/hr natural
gas-fired heater and increase daily limits on crude oil transloading. Transloading has been requested to increase from 14,600,000 barrels
through storage tanks to 43,800,000 barrels annually and decrease from 10,400,000 barrels loaded through mobile operations to 3,650,000
barrels. These operations will be controlled with an internal floating roof storage tank and a control flare.
The completed engineering evaluation and air quality impact analysis showed the proposed project meets the requirements of federal air
quality regulations and the State air quality rules. The Director intends to issue an Approval Order pending a 30-day public comment period.
The project proposal, estimate of the effect on local air quality, and draft Approval Order are available for public inspection and comment at
the Utah Division of Air Quality, 195 North 1950 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116. Written comments
received by the Division at this same address on or before March 21, 2025, will be considered in making the final decision on the
approval/disapproval of the proposed project. Email comments will also be accepted at [e-mail]. If anyone so requests to the
Director in writing within 15 days of publication of this notice, a hearing will be held in accordance with R307-401-7, UAC.
Under Section 19-1-301.5, a person who wishes to challenge a Permit Order may only raise an issue or argument during an adjudicatory
proceeding that was raised during the public comment period and was supported with sufficient information or documentation to enable the
Director to fully consider the substance and significance of the issue.
Published in the ETV Newspaper February 19, 2025.
Back

DAQE-NN148620004-25

February 13, 2025

ETV News (Emery Telcom)
Legal Advertising Dept.
625 East 100 North
Price, UT 84501

RE: Legal Notice of Intent to Approve

This letter will confirm the authorization to publish the attached NOTICE in the ETV News (Emery
Telcom) on February 19, 2025.

Please mail the invoice and affidavit of publication to the Utah State Department of Environmental
Quality, Division of Air Quality, P.O. Box 144820, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820. If you have any
questions, contact Jeree Greenwood, who may be reached at [phone].

Sincerely,

{{$s }}

Jeree Greenwood
Office Technician

Enclosure

cc: Carbon County
cc: Southeastern Association of Governments

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX
Governor
DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor

Department of
Environmental Quality

Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird
Director

DAQE-NN148620004-25
Page 2
NOTICE

A Notice of Intent for the following project submitted in accordance with R307-401-1, Utah
Administrative Code (UAC), has been received for consideration by the Director:

Company Name: Price River Terminal
Location: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility – 6000 East Wash Plant
Road, Wellington, UT
Project Description: Price River Terminal, LLC has requested to install and operate a new 120,000
barrel storage tank and 4MMBtu/hr natural gas-fired heater and increase daily
limits on crude oil transloading. Transloading has been requested to increase
from 14,600,000 barrels through storage tanks to 43,800,000 barrels annually and
decrease from 10,400,000 barrels loaded through mobile operations to 3,650,000
barrels. These operations will be controlled with an internal floating roof storage
tank and a control flare.

The completed engineering evaluation and air quality impact analysis showed the proposed project meets
the requirements of federal air quality regulations and the State air quality rules. The Director intends to
issue an Approval Order pending a 30-day public comment period. The project proposal, estimate of the
effect on local air quality, and draft Approval Order are available for public inspection and comment at
the Utah Division of Air Quality, 195 North 1950 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116. Written comments
received by the Division at this same address on or before March 21, 2025, will be considered in making
the final decision on the approval/disapproval of the proposed project. Email comments will also be
accepted at [e-mail]. If anyone so requests to the Director in writing within 15 days of
publication of this notice, a hearing will be held in accordance with R307-401-7, UAC.

Under Section 19-1-301.5, a person who wishes to challenge a Permit Order may only raise an issue or
argument during an adjudicatory proceeding that was raised during the public comment period and was
supported with sufficient information or documentation to enable the Director to fully consider the
substance and significance of the issue.

Date of Notice: February 19, 2025

{{#s=Sig_es_:signer1:signature}}

DAQE-

RN148620004 November 21, 2024 Benoit Lemarche
Price River Terminal 3215 West 4th Street Fort Worth, TX 76107
[e-mail] Dear Benoit Lemarche,
Re: Engineer Review: Modification to Approval Order DAQE-AN148620003-20 to Increase Transloading Limits and Add a Storage Tank Project Number: N148620004 The DAQ requests a company representative review and sign the attached Engineer Review (ER). This ER identifies all applicable elements of the New Source Review permitting program. Price River Terminal should complete this review within 10 business days of receipt. Price River Terminal should contact Dylan Frederick at [phone] if there are questions or
concerns with the review of the draft permit conditions. Upon resolution of your concerns, please email Dylan Frederick at [e-mail] the signed cover letter. Upon receipt of the signed cover letter, the DAQ will prepare an ITA for a 30-day public comment period. At the completion of the comment period, the DAQ will address any comments and will prepare an Approval Order (AO) for signature by the DAQ Director.
If Price River Terminal does not respond to this letter within 10 business days, the project will move forward without source concurrence. If Price River Terminal has concerns that cannot be resolved and the project becomes stagnant, the DAQ Director may issue an Order prohibiting construction. Approval Signature _____________________________________________________________ (Signature & Date)

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
Department of Environmental Quality
Kimberly D. Shelley Executive Director DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY Bryce C. Bird Director
State of Utah
SPENCER J. COX Governor DEIDRE HENDERSON Lieutenant Governor

Engineer Review N148620004: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility November 21, 2024 Page 1
UTAH DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
ENGINEER REVIEW

SOURCE INFORMATION
Project Number N148620004 Owner Name Price River Terminal Mailing Address 3215 West 4th Street
Fort Worth, TX, 76107 Source Name Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility
Source Location 39.526983 -110.70372 Wellington, UT 84542
UTM Projection 525,464 m Easting, 4,375,301 m Northing UTM Datum NAD83 UTM Zone UTM Zone 12 SIC Code 4226 (Special Warehousing & Storage, NEC) Source Contact Benoit Lemarche Phone Number [phone] Email [e-mail] Billing Contact Benoit Lemarche
Phone Number [phone] Email [e-mail]
Project Engineer Dylan Frederick, Engineer Phone Number [phone] Email [e-mail]
Notice of Intent (NOI) Submitted September 26, 2023 Date of Accepted Application July 12, 2024

Engineer Review N148620004: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility November 21, 2024 Page 2
SOURCE DESCRIPTION General Description
Price River Terminal, LLC (PRT) operates a transloading facility. The facility transfers crude oil from tanker trucks to an oil storage tank and then to railcars which are shipped to various crude oil refineries throughout the United States. PRT also has the ability to load crude oil directly from
tanker trucks to railcars. Railcars are filled and stored on-site until approximately 90 rail cars have been filled. The railcars are then connected to a locomotive engine and transported via rail to a crude oil refinery. NSR Classification: Minor Modification at Minor Source Source Classification Located in Attainment Area, Carbon County Airs Source Size: B
Applicable Federal Standards NSPS (Part 60), A: General Provisions
NSPS (Part 60), Kb: Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After July 23, 1984
Project Proposal Modification to Approval Order DAQE-AN148620003-20 to Increase Transloading Limits and Add a Storage Tank Project Description
PRT requested approval to install and operate a new liquid storage tank and heater, as well as increase the daily limit on crude oil transloading. The storage tank has a capacity of 120,000 barrels and will have an average throughput of 460 million gallons per year. The tank heater is rated at 4 MMBtu per hour and will be operated at 8760 hours per year. An additional increase of 10,000 barrels of transloading is requested to occur via truck traffic. EMISSION IMPACT ANALYSIS A 24-hour PM10 and PM2.5 model was completed by the DAQ (see memo DAQE-MN148620004-24). The 24-hour PM10 model predicted the maximum total concentration would be 83.9% of the NAAQS. The 24-hour PM2.5 model predicted the maximum total concentration would be 63.1% of the NAAQS. No operational restrictions were recommended as a result of the model. No other criteria pollutants or HAPs were modeled as they are below the modeling thresholds contained in R307-410-4 and R307-410-5, or the source is in a non-attainment area for the pollutant.
[Last updated July 28, 2024]

Engineer Review N148620004: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility November 21, 2024 Page 3
SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS
The emissions listed below are an estimate of the total potential emissions from the source. Some rounding of emissions is possible.
Criteria Pollutant Change (TPY) Total (TPY) CO2 Equivalent 1083.74 43658.00 Carbon Monoxide 1.80 62.33
Nitrogen Oxides 2.14 24.56
Particulate Matter - PM10 -7.31 4.55
Particulate Matter - PM2.5 -3.36 1.18
Sulfur Dioxide 0.02 0.34
Volatile Organic Compounds 47.72 80.56 Hazardous Air Pollutant Change (lbs/yr) Total (lbs/yr)
Generic HAPs (CAS #GHAPS) -370 62
Hexane (CAS #110543) 1080
Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
Total HAPs 0.35 0.57
Note: Change in emissions indicates the difference between previous AO and proposed modification.

Engineer Review N148620004: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility November 21, 2024 Page 4
Review of BACT for New/Modified Emission Units 1. BACT review regarding Transloading and storage tanks
The increase in transloading from the storage tanks will result in increased emissions of VOCs and HAPs. PRT is also requesting to install a new storage tank To control these emissions, the following options were considered:
Use of an internal floating roof design Submerged fill loading Vapor Capture system routed to a flare Use of a leak detection and repair program (LDAR)
PRT currently utilizes all of the above controls in existing storage tanks. The new storage tank will have an internal floating roof design which decreases VOC emissions by limiting air contact with the surface of the crude oil. The flare is designed with a 98% destruction efficiency and will operate with no visible emissions. The facility currently employs a leak detection and repair program to inspect the tank seals and other potential sources of fugitive leaks and will continue to operate here. These methods represent BACT for transloading activities and the new storage tank. BACT for control of VOCs and HAPs from transloading activities to the storage tanks will be in the installation of a tank with an internal floating roof, installation of a submerged fill pipe system, use of a LDAR program, and installation of a vapor capture system routing to a flare. The flare will operate with no visible emissions. [Last updated November 15, 2024] 2. BACT review regarding Haul Roads The increase in transloading via road traffic will result in increased emissions of PM10 and PM2.5 from the haul roads. To control emissions from this activity, the following was considered: Watering (75% control) Watering with Road Base (80% control)
Chemical Suppressants (85% control) Paving with watering (90% control) Paving with watering and vacuum sweeping (95% control)
Of these, PRT has selected paving with watering and vacuum sweeping. This offers the highest
degree of control available, therefore, no further analysis is necessary.
BACT for control of PM10 and PM2.5 from haul road traffic will be paving the haul roads and watering and vacuum sweeping the roads to maintain an opacity limit of 20%. [Last updated November 15, 2024]
SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS
The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the
AO. (New or Modified conditions are indicated as “New” in the Outline Label):

Engineer Review N148620004: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility November 21, 2024 Page 5
I.1 All definitions, terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in the UAC R307 and 40 CFR. Unless noted otherwise, references cited in these AO conditions refer to those rules. [R307-101]

I.2 The limits set forth in this AO shall not be exceeded without prior approval. [R307-401]
I.3 Modifications to the equipment or processes approved by this AO that could affect the emissions covered by this AO must be reviewed and approved. [R307-401-1]
I.4 All records referenced in this AO or in other applicable rules, which are required to be kept by
the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Director or Director's representative upon request, and the records shall include the two-year period prior to the date of the request. Unless otherwise specified in this AO or in other applicable state and federal rules, records shall be kept for a minimum of two (2) years. [R307-401-8] I.5 At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners and operators shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any equipment approved under this AO, including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations, review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source. All maintenance performed on equipment authorized by this AO shall be recorded. [R307-
401-4] I.6 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-107. General Requirements: Breakdowns. [R307-107]
I.7 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-150 Series. Emission Inventories. [R307-
150] I.8 The owner/operator shall submit documentation of the status of construction or modification to the Director within 18 months from the date of this AO. This AO may become invalid if
construction is not commenced within 18 months from the date of this AO or if construction is discontinued for 18 months or more. To ensure proper credit when notifying the Director, send the documentation to the Director, attn.: NSR Section. [R307-401-18]

SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT
The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the AO. (New or Modified conditions are indicated as “New” in the Outline Label): II.A THE APPROVED EQUIPMENT II.A.1 Crude Oil Transloading Facility

Engineer Review N148620004: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility November 21, 2024 Page 6
II.A.2 Three (3) Oil Storage Tanks Maximum Capacities: one 88,300 bbl, and two 120,000 bbl (one NEW) Tank VOC Control Type: Floating Roofs

II.A.3 One (1) Flare Maximum Capacity: 0.48 MMBTU/hr Contains: Blower Control Efficiency: 98% Controls: Transloading activities II.A.4 Five (5) Adsorption Units Maximum Flowrate: 150 acfm Equipped with a breakthrough monitor II.A.5 Three (3) Tank Heaters Maximum Rated Capacity: less than 5 MMBtu/hr (each)
Fuel: Natural Gas II.A.6 One (1) Diesel Storage Tank* Maximum Tank Capacity: 1,000 gallons *Tank is noted for informational purposes only. II.A.7 Loading/Unloading Racks
SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS
The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the AO. (New or Modified conditions are indicated as “New” in the Outline Label): II.B REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS
II.B.1 Site-Wide Requirements II.B.1.a NEW The owner/operator shall not exceed the following processing limitations: A. 14,600,000 barrels (bbls) of crude oil processed through the oil storage tanks and
transloaded to railcars per rolling 12-month period. B. 10,400,000 bbls of crude oil transloaded to railcars through mobile operations per
rolling 12-month period. [R307-401-8]
II.B.1.a.1 To determine compliance with a rolling 12-month total, the owner/operator shall calculate a new 12-month total by the 20th day of each month using data from the previous 12 months. Records of tank versus mobile crude oil railcar loading shall be individually kept for all
periods when the plant is in operation. Site-wide crude oil transloading shall be determined by examination of company and/or customer billing records. The records of crude oil transloading shall be kept on a daily basis. [R307-401-8]

Engineer Review N148620004: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility November 21, 2024 Page 7
II.B.1.b The owner/operator shall route all emissions from all tank loading and unloading operations to an operational flare prior to exhausting the air to the atmosphere. [R307-401-8]
II.B.1.c The owner/operator shall route all emissions from all mobile railcar loading and unloading operations to a carbon adsorption drum prior to exhausting the air to the atmosphere. [R307-401-8] II.B.1.d The owner/operators shall replace the carbon in the affected adsorber drum upon activation of the breakthrough monitor. Each adsorber drum shall have the carbon replaced at a minimum
of once annually. Records of adsorber drum carbon replacement shall be kept and maintained onsite. [R307-401-8]
II.B.1.e Unless otherwise specified in this AO, the owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any stationary point or fugitive emission source on site to exceed 10% opacity. [R307-401-8]
II.B.1.e.1 Opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted while in operation in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. [R307-401-8]
II.B.2 Tank Requirements
II.B.2.a The owner/operator shall load the rail cars on site by the use of splash and submerged loading from the oil storage tank. The owner/operator shall load the truck tankers from the bottom. [R307-401-8]

II.B.3 Flare Requirements
II.B.3.a The owner/operator shall not allow any visible emissions from the flare. [R307-401-8]

II.B.3.a.1 Visual determination of smoke emissions from flares shall be conducted according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 22. [R307-401-8]
II.B.4 Fugitive Dust Requirements II.B.4.a The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from haul roads, terminal access roads, and mobile equipment in operational areas to exceed 20% opacity. [R307-205]

II.B.4.a.1 Visible emission determinations for fugitive dust from haul-road traffic and mobile equipment areas shall use procedures similar to Method 9. The normal requirement for observations to be made at 15-second intervals over a six-minute period, however, shall not apply. Visible emissions shall be measured at the densest point of the plume but at a point not less than 1/2 vehicle length behind the vehicle and not less than 1/2 the height of the vehicle. [R307-205]
II.B.4.b To prevent visible emissions from exceeding the opacity limits listed in this AO, the owner/operator shall use water application on haul roads, terminal access roads, and all fugitive dust sources (including haul roads and terminal access roads) on site. The owner/operator may stop applying water to fugitive dust sources when the temperature is below freezing but shall apply other controls as necessary to prevent visible emissions from exceeding the opacity limits listed in the AO. [R307-401-8]

Engineer Review N148620004: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility November 21, 2024 Page 8
II.B.4.b.1 NEW Records of water application shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. The records shall include the following items: A. Date and time water application was made B. Number of water applications made and quantity of water applied
C. Rainfall amount received, if any
D. Records of temperature, if the temperature was below freezing. [R307-401-8]

II.B.5 Monitoring Requirements of Fugitive Emissions (Leak Detection and Repair)
II.B.5.a The owner/operator shall develop a fugitive emissions monitoring plan for the storage tanks and flare operations. At a minimum, the plan shall include:
A. Monitoring frequency
B. Monitoring technique and equipment
C. Procedures and timeframes for identifying and repairing leaks
D. Recordkeeping practices E. Calibration and maintenance procedures. [R307-401-8]
II.B.5.b NEW The owner/operator shall conduct monitoring surveys on site to observe each "fugitive emissions component" for "fugitive emissions."
A. "Fugitive emissions component" means any component that has the potential to emit
fugitive emissions of VOC, including but not limited to valves, connectors, pressure
relief devices, open-ended lines, flanges, covers and closed vent systems, thief hatches
or other openings, instruments, and meters.
B. "Fugitive emissions" are considered any visible emissions observed using optical gas
imaging or a Method 21 instrument reading of 500 ppm or greater. [R307-401-8] II.B.5.b.1 NEW Monitoring surveys shall be conducted according to the following schedule: A. No later than 90 days after startup or 180 days from the date of this AO.
B. Annually after the initial leak detection inspection. [R307-401-8]
II.B.5.b.2 NEW Monitoring surveys shall be conducted using one or both of the following to detect fugitive emissions: A. Optical gas imaging (OGI) equipment. OGI equipment shall be capable of imaging
gases in the spectral range for the compound of highest concentration in the potential
fugitive emissions.
B. Monitoring equipment that meets U.S. EPA Method 21, 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. [R307-401-8]

Engineer Review N148620004: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility November 21, 2024 Page 9
II.B.5.c If fugitive emissions are detected at any time, the owner/operator shall repair the fugitive emissions component as soon as possible but no later than 15 calendar days after detection. If the repair or replacement is technically infeasible, or would be unsafe to repair during operation of the unit, the repair or replacement must be completed during the next shutdown, or within 24 months, whichever is earlier. [R307-401-8]
II.B.5.c.1 The owner/operator shall resurvey the repaired or replaced fugitive emissions component no later than 30 calendar days after the fugitive emissions component was repaired. [R307-401-8]
II.B.5.d The owner/operator shall maintain records of the fugitive emissions monitoring plan, monitoring surveys, repairs, and resurveys. [R307-401-8]

Engineer Review N148620004: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility November 21, 2024 Page 10
PERMIT HISTORY When issued, the approval order shall supersede (if a modification) or will be based on the
following documents: Supersedes DAQE-AN146820003-20 dated July 23, 2020
Is Derived From NOI dated September 26, 2023 Incorporates Additional Information dated November 27, 2023 Incorporates Additional Information dated May 1, 2024 Incorporates Additional Information dated August 14, 2024 Incorporates Additional Information dated August 28, 2024 Incorporates Additional Information dated October 18, 2024 Incorporates Additional Information dated October 30, 2024
REVIEWER COMMENTS
1. Comment regarding Emission Estimates: Emissions were estimated using the following assumptions and methods: Mobile Transloading - The throughput was estimated at 10,000 bbls per day for black and yellow crude. Transloading of yellow crude has a higher potential for VOC emissions, while black crude
has a higher HAP emission potential. To be conservative, VOC emissions were calculated with the throughput being all yellow crude, and HAP emissions were calculated with the throughput being all black crude. VOC emissions from the loading of crude oil from mobile operations were calculated using AP-42, Section 5.2 equation 1. Transloading through mobile operations occurs when tanker trucks load crude oil directly into rail cars. An overall control efficiency of 95% was assumed along with a capture efficiency of 95%. This gives an overall control of 90.25% from carbon adsorption. HAP emissions were determined using yellow crude speciation data. Fixed Transloading - The throughput was estimated at 120,000 bbls per day for black and yellow crude. To be conservative, VOC emissions were calculated with the throughput being all yellow crude, and HAP emissions were calculated with the throughput being all black crude. VOC
emissions from the loading of crude oil from mobile operations were calculated using AP-42, Section 5.2 equation 1. Emissions are routed to a control flare that operates at 98% efficiency. Hexane is estimated to be 1% by weight of all crude.
The criteria and HAP emissions from the natural gas combustion equipment (including tank heaters
and flare pilot) were obtained from EPA's AP-42 emission factors section Table 1.4-1. The boilers are rated at 4 MMBtu/hr each. The criteria and HAP emissions from the flare were estimated using emission factors found in EPA's AP-42 emission factors section 13.5 and the flare manufacturer. The flare will achieve at least a
98% reduction in VOC emissions from the oil storage tank and railcar loading. A 100% capture efficiency was assumed for emissions from transloading because the fill line and vapor return line are sealed to the hatch/cover before transloading and due to the 5 hp blower attached to the flare.
The VOC and HAP emissions from the various fugitive equipment leaks were estimated using emission factors from EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates [EPA-453/R-95-017]. The number and sources (valves, flanges, etc.) of fugitive emissions were estimated from review of PRT's facility plan.

Engineer Review N148620004: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility November 21, 2024 Page 11
Haul Roads - Unpaved haul road PM10 and PM2.5 emissions were estimated using AP-42, Section 13.2.2 and guidance from the DAQ on paved and unpaved haul roads. A control efficiency of 95% was used, along with a mean vehicle weight of 40.06 tons, and haul road length of 0.4 miles. Fugitive Emissions from Leaks - Emission factors were taken from Table 2-4 in EPA-453/R-95-017, "Protocol for Equipment Leak Emissions Estimates", November 1995. The total components were estimated to be 450 valves, 17 pumps, 60 connectors, 404 flanges, and 27 "other" components. [Last updated November 15, 2024] 3. Comment regarding NSPS and MACT Review: Subpart Kb affects storage vessels with a capacity greater than or equal to 75 cubic meters that is
used to store volatile organic liquids for which construction, reconstruction, or modification is commenced after July 23, 1984. This subpart does not apply to storage vessels with a capacity greater than or equal to 151 cubic meters storing a liquid with a maximum true vapor pressure less than 3.5 kilopascals. PRT will have two tanks with capacities greater than 151 cubic meters. The vapor pressure will be greater than 3.5 kilopascals, therefore, Subpart Kb will apply to PRT's storage vessels. Price River Terminal shall be required to install a floating roof that will rest or float on the
liquid surface in side a storage vessel that has a fixed roof. Each internal floating roof shall be equipped with either a foam- or liquid-filled seal, two seals, or a mechanical shoe seal between the wall of the storage vessel and the edge of the internal floating roof. The source will be required to inspect these controls and maintain documentation of each inspection.
[Last updated November 15, 2024] 4. Comment regarding Title V Applicability:
Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act (Title V) applies to the following:
1. Any major source; 2. Any source subject to a standard, limitation, or other requirement under Section 111 of the Act, Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources; 3. Any source subject to a standard or other requirement under Section 112 of the Act, Hazardous Air Pollutants; 4. Any Title IV affected source.
This facility is not a major source and is not a Title IV source. PRT is subject to NSPS Subpart Kb, but is not subject to any emission limit requirements, therefore, this facility is not subject to Title V requirements. [Last updated January 4, 2024]

Engineer Review N148620004: Price River Terminal, LLC - Oil Transloading Facility November 21, 2024 Page 12
ACRONYMS The following lists commonly used acronyms and associated translations as they apply to this document:
40 CFR Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations AO Approval Order BACT Best Available Control Technology
CAA Clean Air Act CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments CDS Classification Data System (used by EPA to classify sources by size/type) CEM Continuous emissions monitor CEMS Continuous emissions monitoring system CFR Code of Federal Regulations CMS Continuous monitoring system CO Carbon monoxide CO2 Carbon Dioxide CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent - 40 CFR Part 98, Subpart A, Table A-1 COM Continuous opacity monitor
DAQ/UDAQ Division of Air Quality DAQE This is a document tracking code for internal UDAQ use EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FDCP Fugitive dust control plan GHG Greenhouse Gas(es) - 40 CFR 52.21 (b)(49)(i) GWP Global Warming Potential - 40 CFR Part 86.1818-12(a)
HAP or HAPs Hazardous air pollutant(s) ITA Intent to Approve LB/HR Pounds per hour
LB/YR Pounds per year MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology MMBTU Million British Thermal Units
NAA Nonattainment Area NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants NOI Notice of Intent NOx Oxides of nitrogen NSPS New Source Performance Standard NSR New Source Review PM10 Particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PM2.5 Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration PTE Potential to Emit
R307 Rules Series 307 R307-401 Rules Series 307 - Section 401 SO2 Sulfur dioxide
Title IV Title IV of the Clean Air Act Title V Title V of the Clean Air Act TPY Tons per year
UAC Utah Administrative Code VOC Volatile organic compounds
UNPAVED HAUL ROADS
From AP-42, Section 13.2.2:E = k (s/12)a(w/3)b((365 - P)/365)
where:
E = size-specific emission factor (lb/VMT) from Table 13.2.2-3
k, a, and b = empirical constants from Table 13.2.2-2
s = surface material silt content (%) from Table 13.2.2-1
W = mean vehicle weight (tons)
P = Number of "wet" days per year (at least 0.01 inches of precipitation)
Site Conditions:
Description
Weight
(tons)
Distribution
(%)
Capacity
(bbls)
# of deliveries
per day
"Supers" - empty 23.5 25 0
"Supers" - full 63.5 25 285
"Singles" - empty 18.25 25 0
"Singles" - full 55 25 210
50% of truck deliveries are "Supers" (285 bbl) and 50% of truck deliveries are "Singles" (210 bbl)
Maximum quantity of crude oil delivered per day:120000.00 bbls/day
Mean Vehicle Weight (W):40.0625 tons
Unpaved road distance:0.4 miles
Operating days per year:365 days/year
Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT):70787.88 miles/year (trucks/day "Supers" + trucks/day "Singles") * Unpaved road distance (miles) * # of operating days/year
Silt content (s):4.8 %(From Table 13.2.2-1 for sand/gravel plant roads)
Number of wet days/year:0 days/year (Reference: Figure 13.2.2-1 in AP-42 Section 13.2.2)
Emissions Control:Paved Haul Roads
Control Efficiency:95 %(Ref: DAQ Guidelines on Emission Factors for
Paved and Unpaved Haul Roads, 1/12/2015)0.1
Emissions Estimate:
Pollutant k a b
E
(lb/VMT)
Uncontrolled
Emissions
(lb/yr)
Controlled
Emissions
(lb/yr)
Controlled
Emissions
(ton/yr)
Controlled
Emissions
(lbs/hr))
Controlled
Emissions
(g/sec)
PM2.5 0.15 0.9 0.45 0.21 14942.79 747.14 0.37 0.09 0.01
PM10 1.5 0.9 0.45 2.11 149427.91 7471.40 3.74 0.85 0.11 `
PM 4.9 0.7 0.45 8.28 586306.26 29315.31 14.66 3.35 0.42
Uncontrolled Emissions (lb/yr) = E (lb/VMT) * VMT (miles/year)
Controlled Emissions (lb/yr) = Uncontrolled Emissions (lb/yr) * (1 - Control Efficiency/100)
Controlled Emissions (tons/yr) = Controlled Emissions (lb/yr) * 1 ton/2000 lb
Controlled Emissions (lb/hr) = Controlled Emissions (lb/yr) / 8760 hrs/yr
Controlled Emissions (g/sec) = Controlled Emissions (lb/hr) * 453.6 g/lb * 1 hr/3600 sec
242.424244
Price River Terminal
Wellington, UT
Vehicle (Truck) Information
242.424244
FUGITIVE EMISSIONS FROM CRUDE OIL EQUIPMENT LEAKS
Basis: EPA-453/R-95-017, "Protocol for Equipment Leak Emissions Estimates", November 1995.
Equipment Leaks monitored or unmonitored?Unmonitored
Crude Oil Specific Gravity (SG):0.86 (Referece: MSDS for Black Wax Crude Oil)
API Gravity = (141.5/SG) - 131.5 = 33.03 °API
Light or Heavy Oil:Light Oil (NOTE: Heavy oil is < 20°API; Light oil is > 20°API)
Equipment Type Service
Emission Factor1
(kg/hr/source)
Number of
Components5
VOC Emissions2,
3 (lb/hr)
VOC Emissions4
(ton/yr)
Valves Light Oil 2.50E-03 334 1.841 8.063
Pumps Light Oil 1.30E-02 13 0.373 1.632
Connectors Light Oil 2.10E-04 45 0.021 0.091
Flanges Light Oil 1.10E-04 303 0.073 0.322
Open Ended Lines Light Oil 1.40E-03 0 0.000 0.000
Other Light Oil 7.50E-03 20 0.331 1.448
TOTAL 11.556
1 Emission factors from Table 2-4 in EPA-453/R-95-017, "Protocol for Equipment Leak Emissions Estimates", November 1995
2 It is conservatively assumed that all organic compound emissions are VOC's.
3 VOC emissions (lb/hr) = Emission Factor * Number of components * 2.20462 lb/kg
4 VOC emissions (tons/yr) = VOC Emissions (lb/hr) *8760 hr/yr * 1 ton/2000 lb
5 Number of components taken from review of P&IDs for facility and from information provided by construction contractor.
"Other" equipment includes pressure relief valves, vents, mixers/agitators, manways/hatches, and strainers.
Price River Terminal
Wellington, UT
FUGITIVE EMISSIONS FROM CRUDE OIL EQUIPMENT LEAKS
Basis: EPA-453/R-95-017, "Protocol for Equipment Leak Emissions Estimates", November 1995.
Equipment Leaks monitored or unmonitored?Unmonitored
Crude Oil Specific Gravity (SG):0.86 (Referece: MSDS for Black Wax Crude Oil)
API Gravity = (141.5/SG) - 131.5 = 33.03 °API
Light or Heavy Oil:Light Oil (NOTE: Heavy oil is < 20°API; Light oil is > 20°API)
Equipment Type Service Emission Factor1 Number of VOC Emissions2, VOC Emissions4
Valves Light Oil 2.50E-03 450 2.480 10.863
Pumps Light Oil 1.30E-02 17 0.487 2.134
Connectors Light Oil 2.10E-04 60 0.028 0.122
Flanges Light Oil 1.10E-04 404 0.098 0.429
Open Ended Lines Light Oil 1.40E-03 0 0.000 0.000
Other Light Oil 7.50E-03 27 0.446 1.955
TOTAL 15.503
1 Emission factors from Table 2-4 in EPA-453/R-95-017, "Protocol for Equipment Leak Emissions Estimates", November 19952 It is conservatively assumed that all organic compound emissions are VOC's.3 VOC emissions (lb/hr) = Emission Factor * Number of components * 2.20462 lb/kg4 VOC emissions (tons/yr) = VOC Emissions (lb/hr) *8760 hr/yr * 1 ton/2000 lb5 Number of components taken from review of P&IDs for facility and from information provided by construction contractor.
"Other" equipment includes pressure relief valves, vents, mixers/agitators, manways/hatches, and strainers.
Price River TerminalWellington, UT
1
Air Dispersion Modeling for Particulate Matter Emissions
from Haul Roads at Price River Terminal, Utah
April 30, 2024
1.0 Background
Price River Terminal (PRT) operates a crude oil transloading facility near Wellington, UT. Figure
1 is an area map showing the location and boundary of the facility. Crude oil is delivered to the
facility in tanker trucks, transferred via LACTs into storage tanks, and transferred into rail cars
for delivery to refineries. Truck traffic over unpaved haul roads is the major particulate matter
(PM) emission source at this facility. Estimated PM emissions from the haul roads exceed five
(5) tons per year, which triggers demonstration of compliance with national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS) for PM, specifically with PM10 and PM2.5. Other existing PM emission sources
currently at the facility include: (i) two natural gas fired tank heaters of 4 million British Thermal
Units per hour (MMBTu/hr) rating (Heaters 1 & 2); and (ii) one vertical flare. For the expansion
project, a new natural gas fired heater (Heater 3) rated 4 MMBTu/hr will be also installed.
Air dispersion modeling was conducted at the request of Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) to
demonstrate compliance with PM10/PM2.5 NAAQS. UDAQ requested PRT to include all existing
and expansion PM emission sources in a site-wide impact modeling and also use a
representative background PM concentration to demonstrate compliance with the PM
(PM10/PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
This document describes the methodology and results of the air dispersion modeling.
2.0 Description of Emission Source
Figure 2 shows the layout of the unpaved haul roads for trucks carrying the crude oil. Emissions
are due to the traction of tires of the trucks. PM emissions from these unpaved roads will be
controlled using chemical dust suppression systems. Calculations of PM10/PM2.5 emissions from
these two routes are in Appendix 1 and summarized in Table 1. These calculations consider a
PM control efficiency of 85% for chemical dust suppression as per guidelines in UDAQ’s
“Guideline for Emissions Factors for Paved and Unpaved Roads – December 1, 2015”.
Table 1: Controlled PM10/PM2.5 Emissions from Haul Roads
Route PM10 PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5
(tons/yr) (lbs/hr) (g/s) (tons/yr) (lbs/hr) (g/s)
Unpaved
Roads 9.36 2.14 0.27 0.94 0.21 0.03
2

The estimated PM emissions for the existing heaters and the flare are shown in Table 2. The
emissions were calculated based on vendor specification and submitted to UDAQ in the air
permit application for the project dated September 25, 2023.
Table 2: PM10/PM2.5 Emissions from Heaters and Flare
Emission
Source
PM10 PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5
(tons/yr) (lbs/hr) (g/s) (tons/yr) (lbs/hr) (g/s)
Heater 1
(4 MMBtu/hr) 0.13 0.03 0.00378 0.13 0.03 0.00378
Heater 2
(4 MMBtu/hr) 0.13 0.03 0.00378 0.13 0.03 0.00378
Heater 3
(4 MMBtu/hr) 0.13 0.03 0.00378 0.13 0.03 0.00378
Flare 0.45 0.10 0.01284 0.45 0.10 0.01284

3.0 Modeling Methodology
Air dispersion modeling was conducted as per UDAQ’s “Emissions Impact Assessment
Guidelines” and generally following the latest version of United States Environmental
Protection Agency’s (USEPA) “Guidelines on Air Quality Models.” PRT is a minor source, and the
emission source is a simple process of fugitive emissions; therefore, air dispersion modeling
protocol was not submitted to UDAQ for this analysis.
3.1: Air Dispersion Model
USEPA’s air dispersion model AERMOD (v23132) was used in the analysis.
3.2 Source Parameters
Haul Roads:
PM10/PM2.5 emissions are generated from unpaved haul roads due to traction of tires of the
trucks. Per general modeling approach, haul roads were considered as area sources. Due to
the layout of the routes, each route was considered as a polygonal area source. The emissions
from the roads are expected to be few feet above the ground level due to turbulence
generated from movement of the trucks. As a conservative approach, the emissions from the
area sources were considered at 3 feet (0.91 meters) above ground level.
The emission rate for area sources is entered as emission flux in units of grams per square
meters per second (g/m2-sec). The hourly emissions in pound per hour (lbs/hr) were converted
to grams per second (g/sec) and then divided by the total area of the route to obtain the
emission flux for each route within the AERMOD model. Because the trucks are expected to
move on the haul roads throughout the year, the same emission rates were used for both 24-
hour and annual average impact analysis for PM2.5. Currently, there is no NAAQS for annual
PM10.
3

Heaters/Flares:
The heaters and the flare were modeled as point sources. The source parameters were based
on permit application for the project dated September 25, 2023. These source parameters were
submitted to UDAQ via email from Michael Jennings (APTIM) on February 2nd, 2024. The source
parameters are shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Source Parameters for Heaters and Flare
Emission
Source
Stack Height
(ft)
Stack
Diameter (ft)
Stack Gas Temperature
(Deg F)
Stack Gas Flow
Rate (acfm)
Heater 1
(4 MMBtu/hr) 9.5 2.0 599 2070
Heater 2
(4 MMBtu/hr) 9.5 2.0 599 2070
Heater 3
(4 MMBtu/hr) 9.5 2.0 599 2070
Flare 26 Calculated [1] 1200 [1] Calculated [1]
[1] Calculated based on net heat release of 66.624 MMBTu/hr using guidelines of the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality (TCEQ).
3.3 Meteorological Data
UDAQ has developed processed meteorological data for use in AERMOD at various locations in
Utah, as shown In Figure 3. The nearest meteorological monitor was determined to be at Price,
UT, approximately 12 kilometers (km) northwest of the facility. Latest available five (5) years of
hourly UDAQ-processed meteorological data (CY2010-2014) from this station was used in the
modeling. The meteorological data was processed with AERMET (v18081).
3.4 Receptor and Terrain Data
Receptors were located at the property boundary and at locations up to 10 km from the
property boundary in all directions. Hill heights and terrain elevation for complex terrain were
generated using AERMAP (v18081). Figure 4 shows a layout of the receptor grid and the area
source layout for the haul roads.
Terrain data was obtained from appropriate DEM files for this region as processed with
AERMAP (v18081) to obtain receptor heights.
3.5 Dispersion Option
Due to the predominantly rural nature of the area surrounding the facility, rural dispersion
option was selected.
3.6 Background Concentrations
UDAQ provided the background concentration of PM10 and PM2.5 to be used for this analysis.
The PM2.5 and PM10 background concentrations were from latest 3-years of data from a
monitor in Price, UT, and in Moab, UT, respectively. The monthly average concentrations
4

provided by UDAQ are included in Appendix 2. The highest monthly 24-hour background
concentrations for both PM10 and PM2.5 and annual background concentration for PM2.5 were
selected from the UDAQ data as listed in Table 4.
Table 4. PM10/PM2.5 Background Concentrations
Pollutant Averaging
time
Background
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Monitor
PM2.5 24-hour 19.1 Price, UT
PM2.5 Annual 3.6 Price, UT
PM10 24-hour 45.0 Moab, UT

4.0 Results
PM10/PM2.5 modeling results of the analysis are shown in Table 5. The model input and output
files are included in Appendix 3.

Table 2. PM10/PM2.5 Impacts from Unpaved Haul Road Emissions
Pollutant NAAQS
(ug/m3) Maximum Site
Impact
(ug/m3)
Background
(ug/m3)
Total Impact
(ug/m3)
24-hour
PM2.5
(8th high)
35 8.41 19.1 27.51
Annual
PM2.5
12 1.52 3.6 5.12
24-hour
PM10
(4th high)
150 92.95 45.0 137.95

5.0 Conclusions
The results indicated that the site wide PM10 and PM2.5 impacts for all averaging times will be
below the respective NAAQS including the expansion project.
Figures
Haul Roads
Figure 1
Site Location Map
Figure 2
Figure 3_UDAQ AERMET Data Sites
Download AERMET ready
data.
Disclaimer: Modeling
protocols should be
submitted, including met data
that is intended to be used.
You should choose the best
met data for your modeling
analysis, but final approval must be obtained from the UDAQ which considers proximity, period of record, and
representativeness.
AERMET Sites
Salt Lake International Airport
Vernal ASOS
St George
Canyonlands
Cedar City
Grand Junction
Milford
Page, AZ
Price
Logan
Spanish Fork
Syracuse
Figure 4 – Receptor Grid layout – PRT PM Impact Analysis from Haul Roads
Figure 4 Contd.
1
Haul Road Emission Calculations
UNPAVED HAUL ROADS
From AP-42, Section 13.2.2:E = k (s/12)a(w/3)b((365 - P)/365)
where:
E = size-specific emission factor (lb/VMT) from Table 13.2.2-3
k, a, and b = empirical constants from Table 13.2.2-2
s = surface material silt content (%) from Table 13.2.2-1
W = mean vehicle weight (tons)
P = Number of "wet" days per year (at least 0.01 inches of precipitation)
Site Conditions:
Description
Weight
(tons)
Distribution
(%)
Capacity
(bbls)
# of deliveries
per day
"Supers" - empty 23.5 25 0
"Supers" - full 63.5 25 285
"Singles" - empty 18.25 25 0
"Singles" - full 55 25 210
50% of truck deliveries are "Supers" (285 bbl) and 50% of truck deliveries are "Singles" (210 bbl)
Maximum quantity of crude oil delivered per day: 120000.00 bbls/day
Mean Vehicle Weight (W): 40.0625 tons
Unpaved road distance: 0.4 miles
Operating days per year: 365 days/year
Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT): 70787.88 miles/year
(trucks/day "Supers" + trucks/day "Singles") *
Unpaved road distance (miles) * # of operating
days/year
Silt content (s): 4.8 % (From Table 13.2.2-1 for sand/gravel plant roads)
Number of wet days/year: 60 days/year (Reference: Figure 13.2.2-1 in AP-42 Section 13.2.2)
Emissions Control: Chemical Dust Suppression
Control Efficiency: 85 % (Ref: DAQ Guidelines on Emission Factors for
Paved and Unpaved Haul Roads, 1/12/2015)
Emissions Estimate:
Pollutant k a b
E
(lb/VMT)
Uncontrolled
Emissions
(lb/yr)Controlled Emissions (lb/yr)
Controlled
Emissions
(ton/yr)
Controlled
Emissions
(lbs/hr))
Controlled
Emissions
(g/sec)
PM2.5 0.15 0.9 0.45 0.18 12486.44 1872.97 0.94 0.21 0.03
PM10 1.5 0.9 0.45 1.76 124864.41 18729.66 9.36 2.14 0.27
PM 4.9 0.7 0.45 6.92 489927.15 73489.07 36.74 8.39 1.06
Uncontrolled Emissions (lb/yr) = E (lb/VMT) * VMT (miles/year)
Controlled Emissions (lb/yr) = Uncontrolled Emissions (lb/yr) * (1 - Control Efficiency/100)
Controlled Emissions (tons/yr) = Controlled Emissions (lb/yr) * 1 ton/2000 lb
Controlled Emissions (lb/hr) = Controlled Emissions (lb/yr) / 8760 hrs/yr
Controlled Emissions (g/sec) = Controlled Emissions (lb/hr) * 453.6 g/lb * 1 hr/3600 sec
242
Price River Terminal
Wellington, UT
Vehicle (Truck) Information
242
2
Background Concentrations from UDAQ
Price State County Site Param POC
24 hour PM2.5 ug/m^3 49 7 1003 44201 1
Year 2022 2023 2024 Monthly
Month Max Max Max Average
1 6 5.1 5.55
2 5.1 2.5 3.80
3 5.7 5.70
4 17.9 17.90
5 19.1 19.10
6 15.1 5.4 10.25
7 8 7.9 7.9588.8 7.2 8.00
9 17.7 5.8 11.75
10 5 4.9 4.95
11 3.3 7.3 5.30
12 4.7 5.6 5.15
Days Data 203 362 31
Months 7 12 2Recovery95.1%98.9%50.8%81.6%
98%
Annual 3.6
Note on calculation of design day for each month:
Values above 98% are truncated to 98% unless substituted for high wind days and are in bold type
Wildfire smoke is included unless its considered an exceptional event
Data on high wind days are not removed due to use of a multi-year average
Moab State County Site Param
24 hour PM10 ug/m^3 49 19 6 85101
Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 Monthly
Month Max Max Max Max Background
1 37 40 38 45 45
2 30 22 35 26 35
3 16 24 25 17 25
4 22 25 21 23 25
5 17 26 39 34 39
6 21 32 39 16 39
7 36 28 41 41
8 20 23 42 42
9 44 29 25 44
10 19 37 20 37
11 26 41 35 41
12 37 44 41 44
Days Data 57 59 61 43
Months 12 12 12 6
Recovery 15.6%16.1%16.7%23.5%18.0%
H1H 57 44 42 67
High wind days not used:
Date PM10 Ave MPH Max MPH
8/4/2000 57 35 44
4/15/2003 67 37 43
Note on calculation of design day for each month:
Use of second high if there is >90% collection of daily PM10 sampling and a full year of data, otherwise the highest for that year is used
The fourth highest value can be used as a single value if all 3 years have daily sampling >90% complete
Wildfire smoke is included unless its considered an exceptional event
Data on high wind days are removed, and not used for background under light to moderate winds
Monthly values can remove the highest value and use the second highest value in each year if daily sampling is >90% complete
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
8/28/1999 3/15/2000 10/1/2000 4/19/2001 11/5/2001 5/24/2002 12/10/2002 6/28/2003 1/14/2004
Moab
PM10
Price River Terminal: Emissions
by Source
Source VOCs
VOCs
Fugitive NOx CO SO2 PM 2.5 PM 10
PM
Fugitive
Total
HAPs Total CO2e
Mobile transloading (10,000 bbls/day)0.063 ------0.0006
Fixed transloading (120,000 bbls/day)56.36 15.50 -----0.57
AST #1 (83,000 bbl capacity)2.33 --------
AST #2 (120,000 bbl capacity)3.02 --------
AST #3 (120,000 bbl capacity) NEW 3.02 --------
Heater #1 (3MMBtu/hr)0.071 -1.288 1.082 0.008 0.098 0.098 --1554.22
Heater #2 (4MMBtu/hr)0.094 -1.718 1.443 0.010 0.131 0.131 --2061.18
Heater #3 (4MMBtu/hr) NEW 0.094 -1.718 1.443 0.010 0.131 0.131 --2061.18
Flare --19.84 58.36 0.31 0.45 0.45 --37981.42
Gravel Road Travel ----0.37 3.74 14.66 --
Total Emissions 65.052 15.503 24.564 62.328 0.338 1.18 4.55 14.66 0.5706 43658.00
Note: all numbers are tons per year
Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure, LLC 5690 DTC Blvd., Suite 600 Greenwood Village, CO 80111
Tel: [phone] www.aptim.com October 30, 2024 Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality New Source Review Section
P.O. Box 144820 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820
To Whom It May Concern
RE: Modification of Price River Terminal Approval Order – Revised BACT Analysis
Price River Terminal (PRT), located at 6000 East Wash Plant Road, Wellington, UT 84542, currently
operates under Approval Order (AO) Number DAQE-AN148620003-20 for the transloading of crude oil. Wellington, located in Carbon County, is currently in an attainment area. PRT is expanding operations
and requesting an increase in permit limits and approval to install new equipment as part of the terminal expansion.
PRT previously submitted an initial application to amend the AO to increase permitted emissions from
increased crude oil transloading. The Division of Air Quality has requested an additional Best Available Control Technology (BACT) analysis for the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) generated from the new
storage tank/increased transloading volume and Particulate Matter (PM) from the non-paved haul roads.
Best Available Control Technology (BACT) Analysis
To control VOC emissions from the new storage tank and increased volume from the transloading process, PRT recommends continued usage of existing controls, which are considered the BACT in this
industry. The oil storage tanks have the potential to emit VOC and HAP emissions from loading and unloading the tanks, as well as working and breathing losses. Vapors leak from the tank seals and other
component associated with the tank. Add on controls for loading, unloading, and working and breathing losses include Vapor Recovery Unit (99%), flare (98%), internal tank controls, and submerged loading.
Identical to the existing storage tanks, PRT has chosen to install an oil storage tank that will utilize an internal floating roof, which decreases VOC emissions by limiting air contact with the surface of the crude
oil. The tank will also be monitored to ensure that all tank seals are in working order, through the continuation of the LDAR program to monitor for leaks. Transloading activities are connected to the
flare. The flare will control emissions from loading activities. The flare will operate with no visible emissions. Both the State of Texas and the South Coast Air Quality Management District in California
considers the following as BACT for VOC emissions from Tank Truck and Rail Car bulk loading (except gasoline): “Submerged fill pipe and vapor collection system vented to a thermal incinerator with a
destruction efficiency greater than or equal to 98.%.” Therefore, PRT believes the current control features in operation now and in the future is the BACT for the transloading operations.
This modification increases the use of haul roads. Haul road use has the potential to emit PM10 and
PM2.5 emissions. Controls for haul road emissions include water application, chemical suppressant, and paving. PRT currently uses water application to reduce emissions and meet opacity limits. Because there
will be significant increase in haul road traffic due to additional transloading volume, PRT will pave the haul roads with vacuum sweeping and watering to achieve a control efficiency of 95% based on the
PRT AO Modification October 30, 2024
2

Emission Factors for Paved and Unpaved Haul Roads guidance published January 12, 2015. This method
has the highest control efficiency and therefore is considered the BACT for controlling PM emissions from the haul road and unloading area.
The previous PM emission calculations submitted to the Division of Air Quality used a control efficiency
of 85% for planned chemical treatment. Because paving the haul roads will increase the control efficiency to 95%, an updated PM emission calculations spreadsheet has been attached to this letter.
To request additional information, please contact me via email at [e-mail] or at 970-
988-9371.
Sincerely,
Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure, LLC

Michael Jennings
Project Manager
Attachments:
PM Emission Calculation Spreadsheet

Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure, LLC 5690 DTC Blvd., Suite 600 Greenwood Village, CO 80111
Tel: [phone] www.aptim.com
September 25, 2023 Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality New Source Review Section
P.O. Box 144820 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820
To Whom It May Concern
RE: Modification of Price River Terminal Approval Order
Price River Terminal (PRT), located at 6000 East Wash Plant Road, Wellington, UT 84542, currently
operates under Approval Order (AO) Number DAQE-AN148620003-20 for the transloading of crude oil. Wellington, located in Carbon County, is currently in an attainment area. PRT is expanding operations
and requesting an increase in permit limits and approval to install new equipment as part of the terminal expansion.
PRT is requesting approval to increase crude oil transloading to 130,000 bbls/day, with 120,000 bbls/day
transloaded through the storage tanks (fixed) and 10,000 bbls/day transloaded through mobile operations.
To meet the increased capacity PRT is also requesting approval to build a third storage tank with a total
capacity of 120,000 bbls and associated tank heater.
Previous operations and emission calculations have distinguished between black and yellow wax.
However, PRT no longer separates these two products and they stored and transloaded together. Current
and future projections show that at least 90% of the crude oil transloaded at the terminal is yellow wax. Given that yellow wax has higher emissions than black wax, PRT has taken the conservative approach
that all crude oil transloaded is yellow wax. This change is reflected in the emissions calculations, which are based on 100% yellow wax.
Lastly, there is a change in operation at the terminal. Energy Transfer will be operating the terminal going
forward. At this time there is no change in terminal ownership, which will remain as Price River Terminal, LLC. Contact information for Energy Transfer is provided on Form 2.
Impact of Change on Air Emissions
The net impact of this requested change will result in increased emissions, particularly for VOCs
and PM10. For VOCs the increased transloading capacity will increase VOC emissions by 32.21 tons per year and PM10 by 11.48 tons per year, due entirely to increased truck traffic on facility roads. Final
VOCs from fugitive emissions will be calculated upon issuance of mechanical drawings for new loading points and tank.
Best Available Control Technology (BACT) Analysis
There is no change in the BACT analysis from the previous AO. All emissions from the fixed transloading
process will be routed to the flare while emissions from the mobile transloading operations will be captured by a carbon drum. There is also no change in the submerged loading process to fill the rail cars.
PRT AO Modification September 25, 2023
2

The new storage tank will have an internal floating roof similar to the existing tanks. PRT will also continue
with the annual LDAR program to detect any leaks in the process and an water application program to reduce dust on the unpaved terminal roads.
To request additional information, please contact me via email at [e-mail] or at 970-
988-9371.
Sincerely,
Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure, LLC

Michael Jennings
Project Manager
Attachments:
Form 1- NOI Application Checklist Form 2 – Company Information
Form 4 – Project Information Form 5 – Emissions Information
Form 19 – Natural Gas Boilers and Liquid Heaters Form 20 – Organic Liquid Storage Tank
Summary of Emissions by Source Emission Calculation Spreadsheets
TANKS outputs

Form 1 Date __________________
Notice of Intent (NOI) Application Checklist Company __________________ Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section
Source Identification Information [R307-401-5]
1. Company name, mailing address, physical address and telephone number 
2. Company contact (Name, mailing address, and telephone number)
3.Name and contact of person submitting NOI application (if different than 2) 4.Source Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates 
5. Source Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 
6.Area designation (attainment, maintenance, or nonattainment)
7.Federal/State requirement applicability (NAAQS, NSPS, MACT, SIP, etc.)
8.Source size determination (Major, Minor, PSD) 9. Current Approval Order(s) and/or Title V Permit numbers 
NOI Application Information: [R307-401]










N/A 
N/A 
A.Air quality analysis (air model, met data, background data, source impact analysis) N/A 
1.Detailed description of the project and source process
2.Discussion of fuels, raw materials, and products consumed/produced3.Description of equipment used in the process and operating schedule
4.Description of changes to the process, production rates, etc.
5.Site plan of source with building dimensions, stack parameters, etc.
6.Best Available Control Technology (BACT) Analysis [R307-401-8]A.BACT analysis for all new and modified equipment
7.Emissions Related Information: [R307-401-2(b)]
A.Emission calculations for each new/modified unit and site-wide
(Include PM10, PM2.5, NOx, SO2, CO, VOCs, HAPs, and GHGs)B.References/assumptions, SDS, for each calculation and pollutant
C.All speciated HAP emissions (list in lbs/hr)
8.Emissions Impact Analysis – Approved Modeling Protocol [R307-410]
A.Composition and physical characteristics of effluent(emission rates, temperature, volume, pollutant types and concentrations)
9.Nonattainment/Maintenance Areas – Major NSR/Minor (offsetting only) [R307-403]
A.NAAQS demonstration, Lowest Achievable Emission Rate, Offset requirements
B.Alternative site analysis, Major source ownership compliance certification
10.Major Sources in Attainment or Unclassified Areas (PSD) [R307-405, R307-406]
B.Visibility impact analysis, Class I area impact
11.Signature on Application
N/A 
Note: The Division of Air Quality will not accept documents containing confidential information or data.
Documents containing confidential information will be returned to the Source submitting the application.
iJoc.i-iirKji'il Dale:' (X!/AS,‘2C U
DAQ 2018-002271
1 of 1
Form 2 Date ____________
Company Information/Notice of Intent (NOI)
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section
Application for: □ Initial Approval Order □Approval Order Modification
General Owner and Source Information
1.Company name and mailing address:
____________________________
____________________________
____________________________
Phone No.: ( )
Fax No.: ( )
2.Company** contact for environmental matters:
____________________________
Phone no.: ( )
Email: _______________________
** Company contact only; consultant or independent contractor contact information can be provided in a cover letter
3.Source name and physical address (if different from
above):____________________________
____________________________
____________________________
Phone no.: ( )
Fax no.: ( )
4.Source Property Universal Transverse Mercator
coordinates (UTM), including System and Datum:
UTM:_________________________
X:____________________________
Y:____________________________
5.The Source is located in:__________________ County 6.Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC)
__ __ __ __
7.If request for modification, AO# to be modified: DAQE #__________________ DATED: ____/____/____
8.Brief (50 words or less) description of process.
Electronic NOI
9.A complete and accurate electronic NOI submitted to DAQ Permitting Mangers Jon Black ([e-mail]) or Alan
Humpherys ([e-mail]) can expedite review process. Please mark application type.
Hard Copy Submittal Electronic Copy Submittal □ Both
Authorization/Signature
I hereby certify that the information and data submitted in and with this application is completely true, accurate and
complete, based on reasonable inquiry made by me and to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signature: Title:
_______________________________________
Name (Type or print)
Telephone Number:
( )
Email:
Date:
[e-mail]
benoit.lamarche@
energytransfer.com
DAO 2018 002272
Page 1 of 1
Form 4 Company____________________________
Project Information Site ______________________________

Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section
Process Data - For Modification/Amendment ONLY
1. Permit Number_______________________________
If submitting a new permit, then use Form 3
Requested Changes
2. Name of process to be modified/added:
_______________________________

End product of this process:

_______________________________

3. Permit Change Type: New Increase*
Equipment
Process

Condition Change ____________________
Other ______________________________
Other ______________________________

Other ______________________________

4. Does new emission unit affect existing
permitted process limits?

Yes No
5. Condition(s) Changing:

6. Description of Permit/Process Change**

7. New or modified materials and quantities used in process. **
Material Quantity Annually

8. New or modified process emitting units **
Emitting Unit(s) Capacity(s) Manufacture Date(s)

*If the permit being modified does not include CO2e or PM2.5, the emissions need to be calculated and submitted to DAQ, which may result in an
emissions increase and a public comment period.
**If additional space is required, please generate a document to accommodate and attach to form.

Doc.uim:i'ii D^lc: 02/28/2018
DAQ 2018-002274
Page 1 of 1
Company___________________________
Site _____________________________
Form 5
Emissions Information
Criteria/GHGs/ HAP’s
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section
Potential to Emit* Criteria Pollutants & GHGs
Criteria Pollutants Permitted Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emissions Increases
(tons/yr)
Proposed Emissions
(tons/yr)
PM10 Total
PM10 Fugitive
PM2.5
NOx
SO2
CO
VOC
VOC Fugitive
NH3
Greenhouse Gases CO2e CO2e CO2e
CO2
CH4
N2O
HFCs
PFCs
SF6
Total CO2e
*Potential to emit to include pollution control equipment as defined by R307-401-2.
Hazardous Air Pollutants** (**Defined in Section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act )
Hazardous Air
Pollutant***
Permitted Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emission Increase
(tons/yr)
Proposed
Emission (tons/yr)
Emission Increase
(lbs/hr)
Total HAP
*** Use additional sheets for pollutants if needed
Jccumonl Dcjlc: 02/28/2018
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section Company: Price River Terminal, LLC
Site/Source: Price River Terminal
Form 19 Date: 9/25/23
Natural Gas Boilers and Liquid Heaters
Boiler Information
1. Boiler Manufacturer: ___________________________________________________________________________
3. Serial Number: _______________________________
4. Boiler Rating: _________________(10
6 Btu per Hour)
5.Operating Schedule: 24 hours per day 7 days per week 52 weeks per year
6. Use: □ steam: psig □hot water □other hot liquid: ________________________________
□Natural Gas □ LPG □ Butane □ Methanol
□Process Gas - H2S content in process gas __________ grain/100cu.ft.
7. Fuels:
□Fuel Oil - specify grade:□Other, specify: ______________________________________
Sulfur content % by weight Days per year during which unit is oil fired: ________________
Backup
Fuel □Diesel □ Natural Gas □ LPG □ Butane □ Methanol □ Other _________________
8. Is unit used to incinerate waste gas liquid stream? □ yes □ no
(Submit drawing of method of waste stream introduction to burners)
Gas Burner Information
9. Gas Burner Manufacturer: _____________________________________________________________________
10. No. of Burners: ______________________________11. Minimum rating per burner: _____________ cu. ft/hr
12. Average Load: _______%13. Maximum rating per burner: ____________ cu. ft/hr
14. Performance Guarantee (ppm dry corrected to 3% Oxygen):
NOx: ______________ CO: ______________ Hydrocarbons: ______________
□Manual □Automatic on-off15. Gas burner mode of control:
□Automatic hi-low □Automatic full modulation
Oil Burner Information
16. Oil burner manufacturer:
17. Model: _______________ number of burners: _________________ Size number: _______________
18. Minimum rating per burner: _____________ gal/hr 19. Maximum rating per burner: ___________ gal/hr
Page 1 of 3
American Heating
4 MM
2.AHE-400Model Number: ______________________________
Thermal Fluid
Industrial Combustion
1 6000
6500
N/A
1429-A18
x
x
x
N/Ax
x
TBD
Page 2 of 3
Form 11 - Natural Gas Boiler and Liquid Heater
(Continued)
Modifications for Emissions Reduction
20. Type of modification: □ Low NOX Burner □ Flue Gas Recirculation (FGR)
□Oxygen Trim □Other (specify) ______________________________________
For Low-NOX Burners
21. Burner Type: □ Staged air □ Staged fuel □ Internal flue gas recirculation
□Ceramic □Other (specify): ___________________________________________________
22. Manufacturer and Model Number: _______________________________________________________________
23. Rating: ______________________ 10
6 BTU/HR 24. Combustion air blower horsepower: ____________
For Flue Gas Recirculation (FGR)
25. Type: □ Induced □ Forced Recirculation fan horsepower: ______________________________________
26. FGR capacity at full load: scfm %FGR
27. FGR gas temperature or load at which FGR commences: OF % load
28. Where is recirculation flue gas reintroduced? _______________________________________________________
For Oxygen Trim Systems
29. Manufacturer and Model Number: ________________________________________________________________
30. Recorder: □ yes □ no Describe: ____________________________________________________________
Stack or Vent Data
31. Inside stack diameter or dimensions ____________
Stack height above the ground ________________
Stack height above the building ________________
32. Gas exit temperature: ___________
OF
33. Stack serves: □ this equipment only, □ other equipment (submit type and rating of all other equipment
exhausted through this stack or vent)
34. Stack flow rate: _________________ acfm Vertically restricted? □ Yes □No
Emissions Calculations (PTE)
35. Calculated emissions for this device
PM10 ___________Lbs/hr___________ Tons/yr PM2.5 ___________Lbs/hr___________ Tons/yr
NOx ___________Lbs/hr ___________Tons/yr SOx ____________Lbs/hr___________ Tons/yr
CO ____________Lbs/hr ___________Tons/yr VOC ___________Lbs/hr ___________Tons/yr
CO2 ___________ Tons/yr CH4 ___________Tons/yr
N2O ___________Tons/yr
HAPs_________ Lbs/hr (speciate)__________Tons/yr (speciate)
Submit calculations as an appendix. If other pollutants are emitted, include the emissions in the appendix.
N/A
N/A
N/A
2'-0"
9'-6"
599
2,070
N/A
x
x
0.030 0.131
0.392 1.718 0.002 0.010
0.329 1.443 0.022 0.094
2061.18 0.94
11.77
Page 3 of 3
Instructions Form 19 – Natural Gas Boiler and Liquid Heater
This application form is applicable to natural gas-fired boilers and liquid heaters. Boiler(s) rated for a total of less than five
million Btu per hr and fueled by natural gas and one million Btu per hour and fired by fuel oil numbers 1-6 are exempt from filing
a Notice of Intent to construct. See Source Category Exemptions R307-401-10 (1) and (2).
NOTE: 1. Submit this form in conjunction with Form 1 and Form 2.
2. Call the Division of Air Quality (DAQ) at [phone] if you have problems or questions in filling out this form.
Ask to speak with a New Source Review engineer. We will be glad to help!
3.Attach specification sheets for all burners, equipment and modifications to boiler.
1. Company name of manufacturer of boiler (specifically the pressure vessel or shell).
2. Manufacturer's model number.
3.Specific identification, serial, number of the boiler.
4. The maximum heat input for which the boiler is rated. Give the value in million British thermal units per hour.
5.The operating schedule for which you want to be permitted. The air quality impact will be evaluated according to this
schedule. Note: The approval order will limit operating hours to what you request.
6.Mark the box indicating the purpose of the boiler.
7.Mark all fuels that you wish to be approved to use, also list the backup fuel to be used if any.
8.If a waste stream is burned, answer yes and submit drawings, etc. to characterize the method.
9.Company name of manufacturer of gas burners. If the boiler is a packaged boiler, list the manufacturer of the boiler.
10.How many gas burners will be installed in the boiler?
11. Minimum gas flow rate at which each burner can operate (in cubic feet per hour)
12.The average load at which you plan to operate each burner, compared to the maximum burner rating.
13.Maximum gas flow rate at which each burner can operate (in cubic feet per hour)
14.List the maximum concentration which the manufacturer guarantees the burners will produce in parts per million of
Nitrogen Oxides (NOX), Carbon Monoxide (CO), and Total Hydrocarbons. If the percentage of Non-methane
hydrocarbons is known, please provide that information.
15. Indicate the method used to control the flame for the burners.
16. Company name of manufacturer of oil burners. If the boiler is a packaged boiler, and has duel fuel capability, list the
manufacturer of the boiler.
17.Manufacturer's model, number (quantity), and size of oil burners to be installed in the boiler.
18. Minimum oil flow rate at which each burner can operate (in gallons per hour).
19.Maximum oil flow rate at which each burner can operate (in gallons per hour).
20. Indicate the type of emissions reduction strategy(ies) used in the proposed boiler.
21. Indicate the low-NOX strategy used in the burner design.
22. Company name of manufacturer of the burners. Manufacturer's model number for the burners.
23. The heat input rating of each burner in million British thermal units per hour.
24. In a forced draft design, the horsepower of the fan motor used.
25.Method for delivering the flue gas to the combustion zone. Forced draft indicates the presence of a fan. Give the fan
horsepower if so equipped.
26. The amount of flue gas which can be recirculated, in standard cubic feet per minute. And the percentage of the flue
gas that can be recirculated at full load.
27. Generally, flue gas recirculation systems start up at a given load or temperature. Give that specification.
28.Where in relation to the burner/combustion zone is the flue gas reintroduced to the boiler?
29.Name of the manufacturer and the model number of the oxygen trim system.
30. Is there a data recorder? If so, describe it: What is recorded? How is it read?
31.Give the inside diameter or the dimensions of the stack. List the stack height above the ground and above the
building in which it is located, describe if the gas flow is vertically restricted. This information will be used in modeling
the impact of emissions on the ambient air.
32.Give the expected gas exit temperature at the end of the stack. Also to be used in modeling.
33.Indicate if other equipment is also vented to this stack. If other equipment is served by the stack, provide the flow
rates, operating parameters, fuel and combustion information that can be used to characterize the total emissions
from the stack.
34.Give the gas flow rate out of the stack in actual cubic feet per minute (acfm).
35.Supply calculations for all criteria pollutants, greenhouse gases and HAPs. Use AP42 or Manufacturers’ data to
complete your calculations.
U:\aq\ENGINEER\GENERIC\Forms 2010\Form19 Natural gas-Fired Boilers and Liquid Heaters.doc Revised 12/20/10
Page 1 of 2
New Source Review Section
_______Date: ______________________
Utah Division of Air Quality
Company: _________________________
Site/Source:________________________
Form 20
rganic Liquid Storage Tank O
Equipment
1. Tank manufacturer: ___________________________2. Identification number: _____________________
3. Installation date: ______________________________4. Volume: __________________________ gallons
5. Inside tank diameter: ______________________ feet 6. Tank height: ________________________ feet
7. True vapor pressure of liquid: _______________ psia 8. Reid vapor pressure of liquid: ____________ psi
9. Outside color of tank: __________________________10. Maximum storage temperature: __________ FO
11. Average throughput: ____________ gallons per year 12. Turnovers/yearly ____ Monthly ____ Weekly ___
13. Average liquid height (feet): _____________________ Yes No Number ______14. Access hatch: □ □
15. T
a. P
r
b. S
Type: ________________________________
16. D
ll Yes No Number_____
ll
ak
ype of Seals:
rimary seals:
□Mechanical shoe
□Resilient filled
□Liquid filled
□Vapor mounted
□Liquid mounted
□Flexible wipe
econdary seal:
eck Fittings:
□Gauge float we □
Gauge hatch/
sample we □ Yes □ No Number_____
Roof drains □ Yes □ No Number_____
Rim vents □ Yes □ No Number_____
Vacuum bre □ Yes □ No Number_____
Roof leg □ Yes □ No Number_____
Ladder well □ Yes □ No Number_____
Column well □ Yes □ No Number_____
Other:_________________________________
17. S
Deck Fitting Category: ________________________
18. T
______________________________________
hell Characteristics:
Condition: _________________________________
Breather Vent Settings: ________________________
Tank Construction: ___________________________
Roof Type: __________________________________
Deck Construction: ___________________________
ype of Construction:
□Vertical Fixed Roof
□Horizontal Fixed Roof
□Internal Floating Roof
□External Floating Roof
□Other (please specify)
19. Additional Controls:
Gas Blanket Venting Carbon Adsorption Thermal Oxidation Other:_______________□□ □□□
20.Single Liquid Information
Liquid Name: __________________________________
CAS Number: __________________________________
Avg. Temperature: ______________________________
Vapor Pressure: ________________________________
Liquid Molecular Weight: ________________________ Liquid Molecular Weight: ________________________
Liquid Name: __________________________________
CAS Number: __________________________________
Avg. Temperature: ______________________________
Vapor Pressure: ________________________________
Price River Terminal, LLCPrice River Terminal
12/12/18
Great Basin Industrial TK-2200
February 2019 5,040,000
160 40
Desert Tan 150
460 million
34.75 x 1
x
Urethane wiper
x
x
x
x
xx
x
x
1
4
80
1
11
New
Atmosphere
Welded
IFR/Bulkhead - Supported Cone
Welded
Typical
x
x
x x 16 circulation vents
91.3 7.61 1.09
91.55 from assay
54.93 from assay
150 F (storage)
Butcher Butte Yellow Wax Crude
91.55
8002-05-9 from SDS
9/25/23
TBD
TBD
Page 2 of 2
Form 20 - Organic Liquid Storage Tank
(Continued)
21.Chemical Components Information
Chemical Name: ________________________________
Percent of Total Liquid Weight: _____________________
Molecular Weight: _______________________________
Avg. Liquid Temperature: _________________________
Vapor Pressure: ________________________________ Vapor Pressure: ________________________________
Chemical Name: ________________________________
Percent of Total Liquid Weight: _____________________
Molecular Weight: _______________________________
Avg. Liquid Temperature: _________________________
Emissions Calculations (PTE)
22. C
Submit calculations as an appendix. Provide Material Safety Data Sheets for products being stored.
alculated emissions for this device:
VOC _________Lbs/hr_____ Tons/yr
HAPs_________Lbs/hr (speciate)______Tons/yr (speciate)
Instructions
Note: 1. Submit this form in conjunction with Form 1 and Form 2.
2. or questions in filling out this form.
Ask to speak with a New Source Review engineer. We will be glad to help!
on number that will appear on the tank.
s or barrels.
r in feet.
liquid (psi).
ach during storage (degrees Fahrenheit).
emptied and refilled per year, month or week.
ss hatches and the number.
17. Specify condition of the tank, also include the following:
d roof tanks
el construction sizes and seam length
olled, or detail
22.ations for all criteria pollutants and HAPs. Use AP-42 or manufacturers’ data to complete your
calculations.
ENERIC\Forms 2010\Form20 Organic Liquid Storage Tanks.doc
Revised 12/20/10
Call the Division of Air Quality (DAQ) at [phone] if you have problems
1. Indicate the tank manufacturer's name.
2.Supply the equipment identificati
3. Indicate the date of installation.
4.Indicate the capacity of the tank in gallon
5. Specify the inside tank diamete
6. Specify the tank height in feet.
7.Indicate the true vapor pressure of the liquid (psia).
8.Indicate the Reid vapor pressure of the
9. Indicate the outside color of the tank.
10.Supply the highest temperature the liquid will re
11. Indicate average annual throughput (gallons).
12.Specify how many times the tank will be
13. Specify the average liquid height (feet).
14.Indicate whether or not the tank has acce
15. Indicate what type of seals the tank has.
16.Indicate what types of deck fittings are installed.
Breather vent settings in (psig) for fixe
Tank construction, welded or riveted
Roof type; pontoon, double deck, or self-supporting roof
Deck construction; bolted or welded, sheet or pan
Deck fitting category; typical, contr
18. Indicate the type of tank construction.
19.Indicate other types of additional controls which will be used.
20.Provide information on liquid being stored, add additional sheets as necessary.
21.Provide information on chemicals being stored, add additional sheets as necessary.
Supply calcul
f:\aq\ENGINEER\G
1.610.37
Refer to SDS Refer to SDS
Price River Terminal: Emissions
by Source
Source VOCs
VOCs
Fugitive NOx CO SO2 PM 2.5 PM 10
PM
Fugitive
Total
HAPs Total CO2e
Mobile transloading (10,000 bbls/day)0.063 ------0.0006
Fixed transloading (120,000 bbls/day)56.36 TBD*-----0.57
AST #1 (83,000 bbl capacity)2.33 --------
AST #2 (120,000 bbl capacity)3.02 --------
AST #3 (120,000 bbl capacity) NEW 3.02 --------
Heater #1 (3MMBtu/hr)0.071 -1.288 1.082 0.008 0.098 0.098 --1554.22
Heater #2 (4MMBtu/hr)0.094 -1.718 1.443 0.010 0.131 0.131 --2061.18
Heater #3 (4MMBtu/hr) NEW 0.094 -1.718 1.443 0.010 0.131 0.131 --2061.18
Flare --19.84 58.36 0.31 0.45 0.45 --37981.42
Gravel Road Travel ----1.53 4.58 17.95 --
Total Emissions 65.052 -24.564 62.328 0.338 2.34 5.39 17.95 0.5706 43658.00
*VOC fugitive emissions will be determined when design documents for the new LACTs and tank are issued
Note: all numbers are tons per year
Price River Terminal
Mobile Transloading Emissions
Railcar Loading Loss Factor
Calculated Uncontrolled VOC Emission Factor:3.06 lb/1000 gallon loaded
(Reference: AP-42, Section 5.2, Equation 1)
Calculated Uncontrolled Largest HAP Emission Factor:2.94 lb/1000 gallon loaded
EF (lb/1000 gal) = 12.46 * S * P * M / T
where:
S =0.6 Saturation factor for "submerged loading, dedicated normal service"
PCrude =5 Vapor pressure of the "black wax" crude oil (psia) from MSDS
MCrude =50 Light crude oil vapor molecular weight (lb/lb-mole) from AP-42 Section 7.1, Table 7.1-2
T =610 Temperature of liquid, R (75 F)
PHAP =2.786 Vapor pressure of worst-case HAP (psia)
MHAP =86.17 Vapor molecular weight of worst case HAP (lb/lb-mole)
Yellow Wax Crude Oil Speciation Data
HAP
Max Composition
(wt%)
Vapor Pressure
(psia)
Molecular Weight
(lb/lb-mole)
Hexane 1 2.786 86.17
Benzene 0.05 1.745 78.11
Hydrogen Sulfide
(10 ppm) - Not a
HAP 0.001 394 34.08
VOC Control Efficiency of Carbon Adsorber Drum
Capture Efficiency:95 %Assumes 5% of loading losses released as fugitive emissions (worst case)
Control Efficiency:95 %Carbon Adsorber manufacturer claims 99% VOC control efficiency; however,
95% control efficiency conservatively assumed for emissions estimation.
Overall Control Efficiency:90.25 %
Emissions from Truck to Railcar Transloading
Barrels
transloaded
Gallons
trandloaded
Annual Loading
Rate (1,000
gal/yr)
Hexane Loading
Rate (1,000
gal/yr) = 1% of
total
Total HAP Loading
Rate (1,000 gal/yr)
= 1.05% of total
Uncontrolled
Annual VOC
(tons/yr)
Controlled
Annual VOC
(tons/yr)
Uncontrolled
Largest HAP
(tons/yr)
Controlled
Largest HAP
(tons/yr)
Uncontrolled
Total HAP
(tons/yr)
Controlled Total
HAP (tons/yr)
10,000 420,000 420 4.2 4.41 0.643 0.063 0.006 0.001 0.006 0.00063
VOC (lb/hr)0.014 Hexane (lb/hr)0.000 Total HAP 0.00014
Benzene (lb/hr)0.000 (lb/hr)
NOTE: Barrels transloaded is based on an average volume of 10,000 bbls/day for 7 days/week and 52 weeks/year
HAP EmissionsEstimated Annual Emissions VOC Emissions
Railcar Loading Loss Factor
Calculated Uncontrolled VOC Emission Factor:3.06 lb/1000 gallon loaded(Reference: AP-42, Section 5.2, Equation 1)
Calculated Uncontrolled Largest HAP Emission Factor:2.94 lb/1000 gallon loaded
EF (lb/1000 gal) = 12.46 * S * P * M / T
where:
S =0.6 Saturation factor for "submerged loading, dedicated normal service"
PCrude =5 Vapor pressure of the "yellow wax" crude oil (psia) @ 150 F
MCrude =50 Light crude oil vapor molecular weight (lb/lb-mole) from AP-42 Section 7.1, Table 7.1-2
T =610 Temperature of liquid, R (150 F)PHAP =2.786 Vapor pressure of worst-case HAP (psia)
MHAP =86.17 Vapor molecular weight of worst case HAP (lb/lb-mole)
Yellow Wax Crude Oil Speciation Data
HAP
Max Composition (wt%)Vapor Pressure (psia)Molecular Weight (lb/lb-mole)
Hexane 1 2.786 86.17
Benzene 0.05 1.745 78.11
Hydrogen Sulfide (10 ppm) - Not a
HAP 0.001 394 34.08
VOC Control Efficiency of Flare
Overall Control Efficiency:98 %
Emissions from Truck to Railcar Transloading
Daily Loading Rate (bbl/day)Operating Days (days/yr)Annual Loading Rate (gal/yr)
Annual Loading Rate (1,000 gal/yr)
Hexane Loading
Rate (1,000 gal/yr) = 1% of total
Total HAP Loading Rate (1,000 gal/yr) = 1.05% of total
Uncontrolled Annual VOC (tons/yr)
Controlled Annual VOC (tons/yr)
Uncontrolled Largest HAP (tons/yr)
Controlled Largest HAP (tons/yr)
Uncontrolled Total HAP (tons/yr)
Controlled Total HAP (tons/yr)
120000 365 1839600000 1839600 18396 19315.8 2818.21 56.36 27.06 0.54 28.42 0.57
VOC (lb/hr)12.87 Hexane (lb/hr)0.124 Total HAP 0.130
Benzene (lb/hr)0.006 (lb/hr)Emissions from Flare Combustion
Gas flow to flare:694 scfm 41640 scf/hr From flare manufacturer (LFG Specialties)Gas heating value:1600 Btu/scf
Gas Heat Input:66.624 MMBtu/hr
Moisture Content Gas Stream:2 %From flare manufacturer (LFG Specialties)NOx Emission Factor:0.068 lb/MMBtu From flare manufacturer (LFG Specialties)
CO Emission Factor:0.2 lb/MMBtu From flare manufacturer (LFG Specialties)
SO2 Emission Rate:0.0703 lb/hr scf/hr * (1 lb-mole/379 scf) * 64 lb SO2/lb-mole * %H2S / 100 - Assumes all H2S is converted to SO2 in flarePM10 (soot) Emission Factor:40 µg/L From AP-42 Table 13.5-1 for lightly smoking flare
PM10 (soot) Emission Rate:0.10 lb/hr (scfm*(1-moisture%/100)*28.317 L/scf)*(µg/L)*(1 g/1,000,000 µg)*60 min/hr* 1 lb/453.6 g
CO2 Emission Factor:60.00 kg/MMBtu From 40 CFR 98.253(b)(1)(ii)(B)N2O Emission Factor:0.0006 kg/MMBtu Default N2O emission factor for "Fuel Use" in Table C-2 of 40 CFR 98 Subpart C
CH4 Emission Factor:0.003 kg/MMBtu Default CH4 emission factor for "Fuel Use" in Table C-2 of 40 CFR 98 Subpart C
NOx emissions:4.530432 lb/hr 19.84 tons/yr Based on 8760 hrs/yrCO emissions:13.3248 lb/hr 58.36 tons/yr Based on 8760 hrs/yr
SO2 emissions:0.0703 lb/hr 0.31 tons/yr Based on 8760 hrs/yrPM10 emissions:0.10 lb/hr 0.45 tons/yr Based on 8760 hrs/yr
CO2 emissions:34317.22 metric tons/yr Based on Equation Y-2 in 40 CFR 98.253(b)(1)(ii)(B) = 0.98*0.001*Volume of gas flared (MMscf)*Heat value of gas (MMBtu/MMscf)*Default CO2 emission factor (kg/MMBtu)
37828.22 tons/yr (NOTE: Volume of gas flared assumes flow rate of 41,640 scf/hr * 8760 hours)
N2O emissions:0.34 metric tons/yr Based on Equation Y-5 in 40 CFR 98.253(b)(3) = CO2 emission rate (metric tons/yr) * [Default N2O emission factor (kg/MMBtu) / Default CO2 emission factor (kg/MMBtu)]0.38 tons/yr
CH4 emissions:1.72 metric tons/yr Based on Equation Y-4 in 40 CFR 98.253(b)(2) = CO2 emission rate (metric tons/yr) * [Default CH4 emission factor (kg/MMBtu) / Default CO2 emission factor (kg/MMBtu)]
1.89 tons/yr (NOTE: It is assumed there is no methane in the gas vented to the flare; weight fraction of CH4 = 0)CO2e emissions:37981.42 tons/yr = (CO2 emissions * 1) + (N20 emissions * 265) + (CH4 emissions * 28)
Estimated Actual Annual Throughput VOC Emissions HAP Emissions
Price River Terminal
Fixed Transloading Emissions
UNPAVED HAUL ROADS
From AP-42, Section 13.2.2:E = k (s/12)a(w/3)b
where:
E = size-specific emission factor (lb/VMT) from Table 13.2.2-3
k, a, and b = empirical constants from Table 13.2.2-2
s = surface material silt content (%) from Table 13.2.2-1
W = mean vehicle weight (tons)
Site Conditions:
Vehicle size 1:2 tons
Vehicle size 2:40 tons
% Vehicle size 1:40 %
% Vehicle size 2:60 %
Mean Vehicle Weight (W):24.8 tons
Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT):107579 miles/year (120,000 bbls per day/285 bbls per truck * 0.7 mile * 365 days)
Silt content (s):4.8 %(From Table 13.2.2-1 for sand/gravel plant roads)
Emissions Control:Basic Watering
Control Efficiency:70 %(Ref: DAQ Guidelines on Emission Factors for
Paved and Unpaved Haul Roads, 1/12/2015)
Emissions Estimate:
Pollutant k a b
E
(lb/VMT)
Uncontrolled
Emissions
(lb/yr)
Controlled
Emissions
(lb/yr)
Controlled
Emissions
(ton/yr)
Controlled
Emissions
(lbs/hr))
Controlled
Emissions
(g/sec)
PM2.5 0.5 0.9 0.45 0.57 10167.24 3050.17 1.53 0.34819 0.04387
PM10 1.5 0.9 0.45 1.70 30501.71 9150.51 4.58 1.04458 0.13162
PM 4.9 0.7 0.45 6.67 119678.75 35903.63 17.95 4.09859 0.51642
Uncontrolled Emissions (lb/yr) = E (lb/VMT) * VMT (miles/year)
Controlled Emissions (lb/yr) = Uncontrolled Emissions (lb/yr) * (1 - Control Efficiency/100)
Controlled Emissions (tons/yr) = Controlled Emissions (lb/yr) * 1 ton/2000 lb
Price River Terminal
Wellington, UT
TANK HEATER EMISSIONS
NOx
(Small Boilers <
100 MMBtu/hr)
CO
(Small Boilers <
100 MMBtu/hr)VOC SO2 PM CO2 N2O CH4Natural Gas Combustion Emission Factors:100 84 5.5 0.6 7.6 120000 2.2 2.3
Units:lb/106 ft3 lb/106 ft3 lb/106 ft3 lb/106 ft3 lb/106 ft3 lb/106 ft3 lb/106 ft3 lb/106 ft3
AP-42 Reference:Table 1.4-1 Table 1.4-1 Table 1.4-2 Table 1.4-2 Table 1.4-2 Table 1.4-2 Table 1.4-2 Table 1.4-2
Maximum heat input for tank heater:4 MMBtu/hr
Maximum annual hours of operation:8760 hours
Average Natural Gas Heating Value:1020 Btu/scf (Reference: AP-42, Section 1.4 - Natural Gas Combustion)
Pollutant Potential Emission Rate (lb/hr)
Potential
Annual
Emissions
(tons/year)
NOx 0.392 1.718
CO 0.329 1.443
VOC 0.022 0.094
SO2 0.002 0.010
PM/PM10 0.030 0.131
CO2 470.588 2061.176 Global Warming Potential = 1
N2O 0.009 0.038 Global Warming Potential = 265 Reference: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases
CH4 0.009 0.040 Global Warming Potential = 28 Reference: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases
CO2e 473.127 2072.297 = CO2 emissons + (N2O emissons * 265) + (CH4 emissions * 28)
Potential Emisison Rate (lb/hr) = Max. heat input rate (MMBtu/hr) * (1,000,000 Btu/MMBtu) * 1 scf/1020 Btu * Emission Factor (lb/MMscf) * (1 MMscf/1,000,000 scf)
Potential Emission Rate (tons/year) = Potential Emission Rate (lb/hr) * 8760 hours/year * 1 ton/2000 lb
Price River Terminal
Wellington, UT
TANKS 4.0.9d
Emissions Report - Detail Format
Tank Indentification and Physical Characteristics
Identification
User Identification: PRT - Yellow Wax Crude Tank - 88300 BBL
City: Wellington
State: Utah
Company: Price River Terminal
Type of Tank: Internal Floating Roof Tank
Description: 88,300 barrel internal floating roof tank
Tank Dimensions
Diameter (ft): 134.00
Volume (gallons): 3,708,600.00
Turnovers: 119.54
Self Supp. Roof? (y/n): N
No. of Columns: 9.00
Eff. Col. Diam. (ft): 1.00
Paint Characteristics
Internal Shell Condition: Light Rust
Shell Color/Shade: White/White
Shell Condition Good
Roof Color/Shade: White/White
Roof Condition: Good
Rim-Seal System
Primary Seal: Mechanical Shoe
Secondary Seal Shoe-mounted
Deck Characteristics
Deck Fitting Category: Typical
Deck Type: Welded
Deck Fitting/Status Quantity
Access Hatch (24-in. Diam.)/Unbolted Cover, Ungasketed 1
Automatic Gauge Float Well/Unbolted Cover, Ungasketed 1
Column Well (24-in. Diam.)/Built-Up Col.-Sliding Cover, Ungask.8
Ladder Well (36-in. Diam.)/Sliding Cover, Ungasketed 1
Roof Leg or Hanger Well/Adjustable 49
Sample Pipe or Well (24-in. Diam.)/Slit Fabric Seal 10% Open 1
Vacuum Breaker (10-in. Diam.)/Weighted Mech. Actuation, Gask.1
Meterological Data used in Emissions Calculations: Salt Lake City, Utah (Avg Atmospheric Pressure = 12.64 psia)
TANKS 4.0.9d
Emissions Report - Detail Format
Liquid Contents of Storage Tank
PRT - Yellow Wax Crude Tank - 88300 BBL - Internal Floating Roof Tank
Wellington, Utah
Daily Liquid Surf.
Temperature (deg F)
Liquid
Bulk
Temp Vapor Pressure (psia)
Vapor
Mol.
Liquid
Mass
Vapor
Mass Mol. Basis for Vapor Pressure
Mixture/Component Month Avg. Min. Max. (deg F) Avg. Min. Max. Weight. Fract. Fract. Weight Calculations
Crude oil (RVP 5) Jan 42.19 38.38 46.01 51.98 2.0035 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Feb 45.35 40.84 49.87 51.98 2.1405 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Mar 49.25 43.96 54.55 51.98 2.3198 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Apr 53.24 46.98 59.49 51.98 2.5153 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) May 57.74 50.54 64.93 51.98 2.7521 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Jun 62.65 54.94 70.36 51.98 3.0308 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Jul 66.53 58.63 74.43 51.98 3.2665 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Aug 65.15 57.72 72.57 51.98 3.1808 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Sep 59.98 52.93 67.04 51.98 2.8769 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Oct 54.07 48.01 60.13 51.98 2.5580 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Nov 48.04 43.61 52.46 51.98 2.2627 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Dec 42.89 39.34 46.44 51.98 2.0332 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
TANKS 4.0.9d
Emissions Report - Detail Format
Detail Calculations (AP-42)
PRT - Yellow Wax Crude Tank - 88300 BBL - Internal Floating Roof Tank
Wellington, Utah
Month: January February March April May June July August September October November December
Rim Seal Losses (lb): 15.4016 16.5568 18.0916 19.7950 21.9009 24.4429 26.6491 25.8408 23.0306 20.1713 17.6000 15.6513 Seal Factor A (lb-mole/ft-yr): 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 Seal Factor B (lb-mole/ft-yr (mph)^n): 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000
Value of Vapor Pressure Function: 0.0431 0.0463 0.0506 0.0554 0.0613 0.0684 0.0746 0.0723 0.0645 0.0564 0.0493 0.0438
Vapor Pressure at Daily Average Liquid
Surface Temperature (psia): 2.0035 2.1405 2.3198 2.5153 2.7521 3.0308 3.2665 3.1808 2.8769 2.5580 2.2627 2.0332
Tank Diameter (ft): 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 Vapor Molecular Weight (lb/lb-mole): 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 Product Factor: 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000
Withdrawal Losses (lb): 281.4217 281.4217 281.4217 281.4217 281.4217 281.4217 281.4217 281.4217 281.4217 281.4217 281.4217 281.4217 Number of Columns: 9.0000 9.0000 9.0000 9.0000 9.0000 9.0000 9.0000 9.0000 9.0000 9.0000 9.0000 9.0000 Effective Column Diameter (ft): 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
Net Throughput (gal/mo.): 36,945,300.000036,945,300.000036,945,300.000036,945,300.000036,945,300.000036,945,300.000036,945,300.000036,945,300.000036,945,300.000036,945,300.000036,945,300.000036,945,300.0000
Shell Clingage Factor (bbl/1000 sqft): 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060
Average Organic Liquid Density (lb/gal): 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000
Tank Diameter (ft): 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000
Deck Fitting Losses (lb): 65.1766 70.0651 76.5601 83.7689 92.6805 103.4377 112.7739 109.3533 97.4613 85.3611 74.4798 66.2333 Value of Vapor Pressure Function: 0.0431 0.0463 0.0506 0.0554 0.0613 0.0684 0.0746 0.0723 0.0645 0.0564 0.0493 0.0438 Vapor Molecular Weight (lb/lb-mole): 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 Product Factor: 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 Tot. Roof Fitting Loss Fact.(lb-mole/yr): 907.3000 907.3000 907.3000 907.3000 907.3000 907.3000 907.3000 907.3000 907.3000 907.3000 907.3000 907.3000
Deck Seam Losses (lb): 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Deck Seam Length (ft): 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Deck Seam Loss per Unit Length Factor (lb-mole/ft-yr): 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Deck Seam Length Factor(ft/sqft): 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Tank Diameter (ft): 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 134.0000 Vapor Molecular Weight (lb/lb-mole): 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 Product Factor: 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000
Total Losses (lb): 361.9999 368.0436 376.0735 384.9857 396.0031 409.3024 420.8447 416.6159 401.9137 386.9542 373.5016 363.3063
Roof Fitting Loss FactorsRoof Fitting/Status Quantity KFa(lb-mole/yr) KFb(lb-mole/(yr mph^n)) m Losses(lb)
Access Hatch (24-in. Diam.)/Unbolted Cover, Ungasketed 1 36.00 5.90 1.20 41.2069Automatic Gauge Float Well/Unbolted Cover, Ungasketed 1 14.00 5.40 1.10 16.0249Column Well (24-in. Diam.)/Built-Up Col.-Sliding Cover, Ungask. 8 47.00 0.00 0.00 430.3830Ladder Well (36-in. Diam.)/Sliding Cover, Ungasketed 1 76.00 0.00 0.00 86.9923Roof Leg or Hanger Well/Adjustable 49 7.90 0.00 0.00 443.0884Sample Pipe or Well (24-in. Diam.)/Slit Fabric Seal 10% Open 1 12.00 0.00 0.00 13.7356
Vacuum Breaker (10-in. Diam.)/Weighted Mech. Actuation, Gask. 1 6.20 1.20 0.94 7.0967
TANKS 4.0.9d
Emissions Report - Detail Format
Individual Tank Emission Totals
Emissions Report for: January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November,
December
PRT - Yellow Wax Crude Tank - 88300 BBL - Internal Floating Roof Tank
Wellington, Utah
Losses(lbs)
Components Rim Seal Loss Withdrawl Loss Deck Fitting Loss Deck Seam Loss Total Emissions
Crude oil (RVP 5) 245.13 3,377.06 1,037.35 0.00 4,659.54
TANKS 4.0.9d
Emissions Report - Detail Format
Tank Indentification and Physical Characteristics
Identification
User Identification: PRT - Yellow Wax Crude Oil - 120000 BBL
City: Wellington
State: Utah
Company: Price River Terminal
Type of Tank: Internal Floating Roof Tank
Description: 120,000 bbl internal floating roof tank
Tank Dimensions
Diameter (ft): 160.00
Volume (gallons): 5,040,000.00
Turnovers: 138.52
Self Supp. Roof? (y/n): N
No. of Columns: 16.00
Eff. Col. Diam. (ft): 1.00
Paint Characteristics
Internal Shell Condition: Light Rust
Shell Color/Shade: White/White
Shell Condition Good
Roof Color/Shade: White/White
Roof Condition: Good
Rim-Seal System
Primary Seal: Mechanical Shoe
Secondary Seal Shoe-mounted
Deck Characteristics
Deck Fitting Category: Detail
Deck Type: Welded
Deck Fitting/Status Quantity
Gauge-Hatch/Sample Well (8-in. Diam.)/Weighted Mech. Actuation, Ungask.1
Vacuum Breaker (10-in. Diam.)/Weighted Mech. Actuation, Ungask.4
Roof Leg or Hanger Well/Adjustable 80
Ladder Well (36-in. Diam.)/Sliding Cover, Ungasketed 1
Column Well (24-in. Diam.)/Pipe Col.-Sliding Cover, Gask.11
Meterological Data used in Emissions Calculations: Salt Lake City, Utah (Avg Atmospheric Pressure = 12.64 psia)
TANKS 4.0.9d
Emissions Report - Detail Format
Liquid Contents of Storage Tank
PRT - Yellow Wax Crude Oil - 120000 BBL - Internal Floating Roof Tank
Wellington, Utah
Daily Liquid Surf.
Temperature (deg F)
Liquid
Bulk
Temp Vapor Pressure (psia)
Vapor
Mol.
Liquid
Mass
Vapor
Mass Mol. Basis for Vapor Pressure
Mixture/Component Month Avg. Min. Max. (deg F) Avg. Min. Max. Weight. Fract. Fract. Weight Calculations
Crude oil (RVP 5) Jan 42.19 38.38 46.01 51.98 2.0035 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Feb 45.35 40.84 49.87 51.98 2.1405 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Mar 49.25 43.96 54.55 51.98 2.3198 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Apr 53.24 46.98 59.49 51.98 2.5153 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) May 57.74 50.54 64.93 51.98 2.7521 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Jun 62.65 54.94 70.36 51.98 3.0308 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Jul 66.53 58.63 74.43 51.98 3.2665 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Aug 65.15 57.72 72.57 51.98 3.1808 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Sep 59.98 52.93 67.04 51.98 2.8769 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Oct 54.07 48.01 60.13 51.98 2.5580 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Nov 48.04 43.61 52.46 51.98 2.2627 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
Crude oil (RVP 5) Dec 42.89 39.34 46.44 51.98 2.0332 N/A N/A 50.0000 207.00 Option 4: RVP=5
TANKS 4.0.9d
Emissions Report - Detail Format
Detail Calculations (AP-42)
PRT - Yellow Wax Crude Oil - 120000 BBL - Internal Floating Roof Tank
Wellington, Utah
Month: January February March April May June July August September October November December
Rim Seal Losses (lb): 18.3900 19.7693 21.6019 23.6359 26.1503 29.1856 31.8198 30.8547 27.4993 24.0851 21.0149 18.6881 Seal Factor A (lb-mole/ft-yr): 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 1.6000 Seal Factor B (lb-mole/ft-yr (mph)^n): 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000
Value of Vapor Pressure Function: 0.0431 0.0463 0.0506 0.0554 0.0613 0.0684 0.0746 0.0723 0.0645 0.0564 0.0493 0.0438
Vapor Pressure at Daily Average Liquid
Surface Temperature (psia): 2.0035 2.1405 2.3198 2.5153 2.7521 3.0308 3.2665 3.1808 2.8769 2.5580 2.2627 2.0332
Tank Diameter (ft): 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 Vapor Molecular Weight (lb/lb-mole): 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 Product Factor: 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000
Withdrawal Losses (lb): 382.5592 382.5592 382.5592 382.5592 382.5592 382.5592 382.5592 382.5592 382.5592 382.5592 382.5592 382.5592 Number of Columns: 16.0000 16.0000 16.0000 16.0000 16.0000 16.0000 16.0000 16.0000 16.0000 16.0000 16.0000 16.0000 Effective Column Diameter (ft): 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
Net Throughput (gal/mo.): 58,177,350.000058,177,350.000058,177,350.000058,177,350.000058,177,350.000058,177,350.000058,177,350.000058,177,350.000058,177,350.000058,177,350.000058,177,350.000058,177,350.0000
Shell Clingage Factor (bbl/1000 sqft): 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060
Average Organic Liquid Density (lb/gal): 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000 7.1000
Tank Diameter (ft): 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000
Deck Fitting Losses (lb): 73.0210 78.4979 85.7747 93.8510 103.8352 115.8872 126.3470 122.5148 109.1915 95.6349 83.4440 74.2049 Value of Vapor Pressure Function: 0.0431 0.0463 0.0506 0.0554 0.0613 0.0684 0.0746 0.0723 0.0645 0.0564 0.0493 0.0438 Vapor Molecular Weight (lb/lb-mole): 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 Product Factor: 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 Tot. Roof Fitting Loss Fact.(lb-mole/yr): 1,016.5000 1,016.5000 1,016.5000 1,016.5000 1,016.5000 1,016.5000 1,016.5000 1,016.5000 1,016.5000 1,016.5000 1,016.5000 1,016.5000
Deck Seam Losses (lb): 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Deck Seam Length (ft): 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Deck Seam Loss per Unit Length Factor (lb-mole/ft-yr): 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Deck Seam Length Factor(ft/sqft): 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Tank Diameter (ft): 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 160.0000 Vapor Molecular Weight (lb/lb-mole): 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 50.0000 Product Factor: 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000
Total Losses (lb): 473.9702 480.8263 489.9358 500.0461 512.5447 527.6319 540.7260 535.9287 519.2500 502.2793 487.0181 475.4522
Roof Fitting Loss FactorsRoof Fitting/Status Quantity KFa(lb-mole/yr) KFb(lb-mole/(yr mph^n)) m Losses(lb)
Gauge-Hatch/Sample Well (8-in. Diam.)/Weighted Mech. Actuation, Ungask. 1 2.30 0.00 0.00 2.6327Vacuum Breaker (10-in. Diam.)/Weighted Mech. Actuation, Ungask. 4 7.80 0.01 4.00 35.7126Roof Leg or Hanger Well/Adjustable 80 7.90 0.00 0.00 723.4097Ladder Well (36-in. Diam.)/Sliding Cover, Ungasketed 1 76.00 0.00 0.00 86.9923Column Well (24-in. Diam.)/Pipe Col.-Sliding Cover, Gask. 11 25.00 0.00 0.00 314.7748
TANKS 4.0.9d
Emissions Report - Detail Format
Individual Tank Emission Totals
Emissions Report for: January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November,
December
PRT - Yellow Wax Crude Oil - 120000 BBL - Internal Floating Roof Tank
Wellington, Utah
Losses(lbs)
Components Rim Seal Loss Withdrawl Loss Deck Fitting Loss Deck Seam Loss Total Emissions
Crude oil (RVP 5) 292.69 4,590.71 1,162.20 0.00 6,045.61