DAQ-2024-007954

DAQE-AN104630032-24

{{$d1 }}

Andrew Riddick
Henkel Corporation
3540 West 1987 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84104
[e-mail]

Dear Mr. Riddick:

Re: Approval Order: Administrative Amendment to Approval Order DAQE-AN104630031-23 to
Allow for Organic Liquids Handling Flexibility under R307-401-12
Project Number: N104630032

The attached Approval Order (AO) is issued pursuant to the Notice of Intent (NOI) received on March 11,
2024. Henkel Corporation must comply with the requirements of this AO, all applicable state
requirements (R307), and Federal Standards.

The project engineer for this action is Christine Bodell, who can be contacted at [phone] or
[e-mail]. Future correspondence on this AO should include the engineer's name as well as the
DAQE number shown on the upper right-hand corner of this letter. No public comments were received
on this action.

Sincerely,

{{$s }}

Bryce C. Bird
Director

BCB:CB:jg

cc: Salt Lake County Health Department
DJ Law, EPA Region 8

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX
Governor

DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor

Department of
Environmental Quality

Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird
Director

April 24, 2024

STATE OF UTAH
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality

{{#s=Sig_es_:signer1:signature}}
{{#d1=date1_es_:signer1:date:format(date, "mmmm d, yyyy")}}
{{#d2=date1_es_:signer1:date:format(date, "mmmm d, yyyy"):align(center)}}

APPROVAL ORDER
DAQE-AN104630032-24
Administrative Amendment to Approval Order
DAQE-AN104630031-23 to Allow for Organic Liquids
Handling Flexibility under R307-401-12

Prepared By
Christine Bodell, Engineer
[phone]
[e-mail]

Issued to
Henkel Corporation - Detergent Manufacturing Plant

Issued On
{{$d2 }}

Issued By

{{$s }}

Bryce C. Bird
Director
Division of Air Quality
April 24, 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE/SIGNATURE PAGE ....................................................................................................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION ...................................................................................................... 3
CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION ............................................................................... 3
SOURCE INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 3
General Description ................................................................................................................ 3
NSR Classification .................................................................................................................. 3
Source Classification .............................................................................................................. 3
Applicable Federal Standards ................................................................................................. 3
Project Description.................................................................................................................. 4
SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS .................................................................................................... 4
SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS .................................................................................... 5
SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT .............................................................................. 5
SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS ..................................................................................... 8
PERMIT HISTORY ................................................................................................................... 13
ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... 14

DAQE-AN104630032-24
Page 3

GENERAL INFORMATION

CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION

Owner Name Source Name
Henkel Corporation Henkel Corporation - Detergent Manufacturing
Plant

Mailing Address Physical Address
3540 West 1987 South 3540 West 1987 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84104 Salt Lake City, UT 84104

Source Contact UTM Coordinates
Name: Andrew Riddick 417,544 m Easting
Phone: [phone],509,170 m Northing
Email: [e-mail] Datum NAD83
UTM Zone 12

SIC code 2841 (Soaps & Other Detergent, Except Specialty Cleaners)

SOURCE INFORMATION
General Description
Henkel Corporation (Henkel) operates a soap and detergent manufacturing plant in Salt Lake City.
Emissions are primarily associated with particulate matter control equipment and natural gas combustion
in a variety of boilers and emergency generators. Henkel employs baghouses, bin vents, dust collectors,
and scrubbers.

NSR Classification
Administrative Amendment

Source Classification
Located in Northern Wasatch Front O3 NAA, Salt Lake City UT PM2.5 NAA, Salt Lake County SO2
NAA
Salt Lake County
Airs Source Size: SM

Applicable Federal Standards
NSPS (Part 60), A: General Provisions
NSPS (Part 60), Dc: Standards of Performance for Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional
Steam Generating Units
NSPS (Part 60), Kb: Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels
(Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or
Modification Commenced After July 23, 1984
NSPS (Part 60), IIII: Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal
DAQE-AN104630032-24
Page 4

Combustion Engines
NSPS (Part 60), JJJJ: Standards of Performance for Stationary Spark Ignition Internal
Combustion Engines
MACT (Part 63), A: General Provisions
MACT (Part 63), ZZZZ: National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

Project Description
Henkel is currently permitted to process a throughput of up to 3,495,680 gallons, combined, of Armosoft
DEQ per rolling 12-month period in Tanks 63 and 63A (Condition II.B.6.a in the Approval Order
DAQE-AN104630031-23).

The current VOC potential to emit (PTE) of Tanks 63 and 63A was estimated in 2023 by using the
Emission Master Tanks Software based on the 2019 EPA Revision. It was established that Armosoft
DEQ had a true vapor pressure of 34.3 kPa, as determined in a laboratory using New Source Performance
Standard (NSPS)-approved ASTM method 2879. The VOC emitted from Armosoft is ethanol.

Henkel would like to replace "Armosoft DEQ" with "Volatile Organic Liquid with a true vapor pressure
not to exceed 34.3 kPa." The removal of the specific brand name would provide Henkel with flexibility
to handle other organic liquids with the same or lower true vapor pressure. Henkel will not be permitted
to handle a volatile organic liquid that contains any VOCs except for ethanol through Tanks 63 and 63A.
Additionally, the volatile organic liquid will not contain any HAPs. Henkel is not requesting to increase
the maximum allowable throughput of Tanks 63 and 63A. Therefore, no emissions are increasing. This
project meets the requirements of UAC R307-401-12 Reduction in Air Pollutants and does not require a
public comment period.

SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS

The emissions listed below are an estimate of the total potential emissions from the source. Some
rounding of emissions is possible.

Criteria Pollutant Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
Ammonia 0 0.85
CO2 Equivalent 0 19094.00
Carbon Monoxide 0 13.47
Nitrogen Oxides 0 16.19
Particulate Matter - PM10 0 28.39
Particulate Matter - PM2.5 0 28.27
Sulfur Dioxide 0 0.13
Volatile Organic Compounds 0 9.87

Hazardous Air Pollutant Change (lbs/yr) Total (lbs/yr)
Formaldehyde (CAS #50000) 0 36
Generic HAPs (CAS #GHAPS) 0 35
Glycol Ethers (CAS #EDF109) 0 186
Hexane (CAS #110543) 0 571
DAQE-AN104630032-24
Page 5

Methanol (CAS #67561) 0 634
Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
Total HAPs 0 0.73

SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS

I.1 All definitions, terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in
the UAC R307 and 40 CFR. Unless noted otherwise, references cited in these AO conditions
refer to those rules. [R307-101]

I.2 The limits set forth in this AO shall not be exceeded without prior approval. [R307-401]

I.3 Modifications to the equipment or processes approved by this AO that could affect the
emissions covered by this AO must be reviewed and approved. [R307-401-1]

I.4 All records referenced in this AO or in other applicable rules, which are required to be kept by
the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Director or Director's representative upon
request, and the records shall include the two-year period prior to the date of the request.
Unless otherwise specified in this AO or in other applicable state and federal rules, records
shall be kept for a minimum of two (2) years. [R307-401-8]

I.5 At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners and operators
shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any equipment approved under this AO,
including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air
pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable
operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to
the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations,
review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source. All
maintenance performed on equipment authorized by this AO shall be recorded. [R307-401-4]

I.6 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-107. General Requirements: Breakdowns.
[R307-107]

I.7 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-150 Series. Emission Inventories.
[R307-150]

SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT

II.A THE APPROVED EQUIPMENT

II.A.1 Detergent Manufacturing Plant

II.A.2 Baghouses and Bin Vents- Group #2
Outlet Emissions Rate: 0.02 grains/dscf
Designations: LSL-6, SODA BV-1, LSL-9, LQD-5, LSL-1

Outlet Emissions Rates: 0.007 grains/dscf
Designation: LSL-4

DAQE-AN104630032-24
Page 6

II.A.3 Baghouses and Bin Vents- Group #3
Outlet Emission Rates: 0.005 grains/dscf
Designations: LSL-8

II.A.4 Baghouses and Bin Vents- Group #4
Outlet Emission Rate: 0.016 grains/dscf
Designations: MESBH-1 and MESBV-2

II.A.5 One (1) Scrubber
LSS-3/1
Model: Clean Gas System Size 54

II.A.6 One (1) Conditioning Drum
Designation: LSL-3
Rating: 2.5 MMBtu/hr
Fuel: Natural Gas

II.A.7 Five (5) Boilers
Fuel: Natural Gas
Ratings:
(1) 8.37 MMBtu/hr
(2) 6.4 MMBtu/hr
(3) 0.77 MMBtu/hr
(4) 2.51 MMBtu/hr
(5) 14.0 MMBtu/hr

II.A.8 Five (5) Heat transfer Labelers
Four (4) heat transfer labelers: Four (4) burners each
Labeler Ratings: 0.17 MMBtu/hr Each (42,000 Btu/hr per burner)

One (1) heat transfer labeler: Six (6) burners
Labeler Rating: 0.25 MMBtu/hr Each (42,000 Btu/hr per burner)

II.A.9 VideoJet coders
Including 32 VideoJet coders

II.A.10 One (1) Emergency Generator Engine
Fuel: Diesel
Engine Rating: 74 hp
Manufacture Year: 2004
NSPS Applicability: None
MACT Applicability: Subpart ZZZZ

II.A.11 One (1) Emergency Generator Engine
Fuel: Natural Gas
Rating: 16 hp
Manufacture Year: 1969
NSPS Applicability: None
MACT Applicability: Subpart ZZZZ

II.A.12 Six (6) Pre-mixers

II.A.13 One (1) Paint booth
Rating: 2,000 scfm equipped
Control: high efficiency over-spray filters

DAQE-AN104630032-24
Page 7

II.A.14 Ethanol and Other Organic Solution Storage Tanks
Tank 52
Capacity: 29,000 gallons
Contents: Citric Acid
NSPS Applicability: None

Tank 60
Capacity: 29,000 gallons
Contents: Denatured Ethanol
NSPS Applicability: None

Tank 63 and Tank 63A
Capacity: 34,000 gallons each
Contents: Volatile Organic Liquid with a True Vapor Pressure not to exceed 34.3 kPa
NSPS Applicability: Subpart Kb

Tank 66
Capacity: 29,000 gallons
Contents: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400
NSPS Applicability: None

II.A.15 Storage Tanks
Tank 1 (34,000 gallons)
Tank 2 (32,700 gallons)
Tank 21 (21,000 gallons)
Tank 22 (34,000 gallons)
Tank 23 (29,000 gallons)
Tank 27 (34,000 gallons)
Tank 45 (21,000 gallons)
Tank 49 (34,000 gallons)
Tank 65 (34,000 gallons)
Tank 65A (34,000 gallons)

NSPS Applicability: None
Above tanks, except for Tank 2, contain a liquid with a VOC maximum true vapor pressure less
than 15.0 kPa. Tank 2 does not contain a volatile organic liquid.

II.A.16 Two (2) Vacuum pumps
MESVP-1 and MESVP-2
Rating: 704 cfm Each
Model Busch RC1000 for the MES conveying system

II.A.17 One (1) Blower
LSL-10
Rating: 600 cfm

II.A.18 Plastic processing equipment
Plastic and additive transfer, storage, mixing and grinding equipment
Control: 13 sock filters

II.A.19 Blow molding equipment
Vents in the blow molding area

II.A.20 Five (5) Electrostatic precipitators
Smog Hog ESP mist collectors in the blow molding area

II.A.21 Six (6) Cooling towers

DAQE-AN104630032-24
Page 8

II.A.22 Four (4) Maintenance shops
Including: parts cleaners, welding equipment, exhaust vents, welding fume collector, and grit
blasting equipment

II.A.23 Hoods
Miscellaneous ventilation hoods in QA labs

II.A.24 Miscellaneous equipment
Liquid transfer, storage, and mixing equipment, including raw material and product storage
tanks, pumps, vents, blending equipment, and bottle-filling equipment

SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS

II.B REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS

II.B.1 Site-Wide Opacity Requirement.
II.B.1.a The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions to exceed 20% opacity unless otherwise
specified within this AO. [R307-401-8]

II.B.1.a.1 Unless otherwise specified in this AO, opacity observations of visible emissions from stationary
sources shall be conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. [R307-305-3]

II.B.2 Site-Wide Natural Gas Requirements.
II.B.2.a The owner/operator shall not consume more than 533.7 million scf of natural gas per rolling
12-month period. [R307-401-8]

II.B.2.a.1 The owner/operator shall:

A. Determine consumption by utility billing statements.

B. Record consumption on a monthly basis.

C. Use the consumption data to calculate a new rolling 12-month total by the 20th
day of each month using data from the previous 12 months.

D. Keep the consumption records for all periods the plant is in operation.

[R307-401-8]

II.B.3 Liquid Detergent Production Requirements.
II.B.3.a The owner/operator shall not produce more than 1,700,000,000 pounds of liquid detergents per
rolling 12-month period. [R307-401-8]

DAQE-AN104630032-24
Page 9

II.B.3.a.1 The owner/operator shall:

A. Determine production with production records.

B. Record production on a daily basis.

C. Use the production data to calculate a new rolling 12-month total by the 20th day
of each month using data from the previous 12 months.

D. Keep the production records for all periods the plant is in operation.

[R307-401-8]

II.B.4 Scrubber Requirements.
II.B.4.a The owner/operator shall maintain the liquid flow rate of Scrubber LSS-3/1 to not be less than 56
gallons/minute. [R307-401-8]

II.B.4.a.1 The liquid flow rate shall be monitored with a flow meter located such that an inspector/operator
can safely read the output anytime. [R307-401-8]

II.B.4.a.2 The owner/operator shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate each monitoring device certified
by the manufacturer. Calibration shall be on an annual basis according to the manufacturer's
instructions. Daily records of reading shall be maintained. [R307-401-8]

II.B.5 VOC and HAP Requirements.
II.B.5.a The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from the printing press dryers to exceed
10% opacity. [R307-401-8]

II.B.5.b The owner/operator shall not emit more than the following from evaporative sources (painting,
printing, coating, and/or cleaning) on site:

8.94 tons of VOC including HAPs per rolling 12-month period.
0.43 tons of all other HAPs combined per rolling 12-month period.

[R307-351, R307-401-8]

II.B.5.b.1 The owner/operator shall calculate a new 12-month total by the 20th day of each month using
data from the previous 12 months. The owner/operator shall use a mass-balance method to
calculate emissions from evaporative sources. The owner/operator may use the following
equations with applicable units to comply with the mass-balance method:

VOCs = [% VOCs by Weight/100] x [Density] x [Volume Consumed].

HAP = [% HAP by Weight/100] x [Density] x [Volume Consumed].

[R307-401-8]

DAQE-AN104630032-24
Page 10

II.B.5.b.2 The owner/operator shall keep records each month of the following:

A. The name (as per the Safety Data Sheet) of the VOC- and HAP-emitting
material.

B. The maximum percent by weight of VOCs and each HAP in each material used.

C. The density of each material used.

D. The volume of each VOC- and HAP-emitting material used.

E. The amount of VOCs and the amount of each HAP emitted from each material.

F. The amount of VOCs and the amount of each HAP reclaimed and/or controlled
from each material.

G. The total amount of VOCs, the total amount of each HAP, and the total amount
of all HAPs combined emitted from all materials (in tons).

[R307-401-8]

II.B.5.c The owner/operator shall store VOC- or HAP-containing materials and VOC- or HAP-laden rags
in covered containers, except when in use. [R307-401-8]

II.B.5.d The owner/operator shall comply with the applicable requirements in R307-325 and R307-335.
[R307-325, R307-335]

II.B.6 Storage Tank (Storage Vessel) Requirements
II.B.6.a The owner/operator shall not process more than the following throughput for the indicated tanks:

A. Tank 52: 63,50,000 gallons of Citric Acid per rolling 12-month period.

B. Tank 60: 606,466 gallons of Ethanol per rolling 12-month period.

C. Tanks 63 and 63A: 3,495,680 gallons, combined, of volatile organic liquids with
a true vapor pressure of no more than 34.3 kPa per rolling 12-month period.

D. Tank 66: 63,510,000 gallons of PEG 400 per rolling 12-month period.

[R307-401-8]

DAQE-AN104630032-24
Page 11

II.B.6.a.1 The owner/operator shall:

A. Determine the volume processed through each tank using process flow meters
and/or sales records.

B. Determine true vapor pressure with ASTM Method 2879.

C. Record the volume processed through each tank on a daily basis.

D. Use the monthly volume processed through each tank record to calculate a new
12-month total by the 20th day of each month using data from the previous 12
months.

E. Keep the volume processed through each tank record for all periods the plant is
in operation.

[R307-401-8]

II.B.6.b The owner/operator shall not process a volatile organic liquid that contains any HAP and/or
VOC except for ethanol through Tanks 63 and 63A. [R307-401-8]

II.B.6.b.1 To demonstrate compliance with the above condition, the owner/operator shall maintain records
of the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for the organic liquid. [R307-401-8]

II.B.6.c The owner/operator shall keep the storage tank thief hatches and other tank openings closed and
sealed except during tank unloading or other maintenance activities. [R307-401-8]

II.B.6.d The owner/operator shall install a carbon canister of both Tank 63 and Tank 63A with a control
efficiency of no less than 95%. [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb, R307-401-8]

II.B.6.d.1 To demonstrate compliance with the above condition, the owner/operator shall maintain records
of the manufacturer's emissions guarantee for the installed carbon canister filters. [R307-401-8]

II.B.6.e The owner/operator shall inspect and replaced the carbon canisters in accordance with the
manufacturer's recommendations to ensure the 95% control efficiency is met. [R307-401-8]

II.B.7 Baghouses and Bin Vents Requirements.
II.B.7.a The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from baghouses and bin vents to exceed
10% opacity. [R307-305, R307-401-8]

II.B.7.b The owner/operator shall install a manometer or magnehelic pressure gauge to measure the
pressure drop across each baghouse filter. [R307-401-8]

II.B.7.b.1 The pressure gauges shall be located such that a UDAQ representative/operator can safely read
the indicator at any time. [R307-401-8]

II.B.7.b.2 The pressure gauges shall each measure the pressure drop in 1-inch water column increments or
less. [R307-401-8]

II.B.7.c During operation of the baghouses, the owner/operator shall maintain the static pressure drop
across each baghouse between 1.0 and 6.0 inches of water column. [R307-401-8]

II.B.7.c.1 The owner/operator shall record the pressure drop at least once per operating day while each
baghouse is operating. [R307-401-8]

DAQE-AN104630032-24
Page 12

II.B.7.c.2 The owner/operator shall maintain the following records of the pressure drop readings:

A. Unit identification;

B. Date of reading;

C. Daily pressure drop readings.

[R307-401-8]

II.B.7.d At least once every 12 months, the owner/operator shall calibrate the pressure gauges in
accordance with the manufacturer's instructions or replace the gauges. [R307-401-8]

II.B.7.d.1 The owner/operator shall maintain records of all pressure gauge calibrations and replacements.
[R307-401-8]

II.B.8 Combustion Equipment Requirements.
II.B.8.a The owner/operator shall not operate each emergency engine on site for more than 100 hours per
calendar year for maintenance checks and readiness testing. Each emergency engine on site may
be operated for up to 50 hours per calendar year in non-emergency situations. Any operation in
non-emergency situations shall be counted as part of the 100 hours per calendar year for
maintenance and testing. There is no time limit on the use of the engines during emergencies.
[40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ, R307-401-8]

II.B.8.a.1 To determine compliance with the annual operation limitation, records documenting the
operation of each emergency engine shall be kept in a log and shall include the following:

A. The date the emergency engine was used.

B. The duration of operation in hours.

C. The reason for the emergency engine usage.

[R307-401-8]

II.B.8.a.2 To determine the duration of operation, the owner/operator shall install a non-resettable hour
meter for each emergency engine. [R307-401-8]

II.B.8.b The owner/operator shall only use diesel fuel (e.g., fuel oil #1, #2, or diesel fuel oil additives) as
fuel in the 74 hp emergency engine. The owner/operator shall only use natural gas as fuel in the
conditioning drum heater, the 16 hp emergency engine, and all the boilers, water heaters, and
heat transfer labelers. [R307-401-8]

II.B.8.b.1 The owner/operator shall only combust diesel fuel that meets the definition of ultra-low sulfur
diesel (ULSD), which has a sulfur content of 15 ppm or less. [R307-401-8]

II.B.8.b.2 To demonstrate compliance with the ULSD fuel requirement, the owner/operator shall maintain
records of diesel fuel purchase invoices or obtain certification of sulfur content from the diesel
fuel supplier. The diesel fuel purchase invoices shall indicate that the diesel fuel meets the
ULSD requirements. [R307-401-8]

II.B.8.c Visible emissions from all-natural gas combustion equipment shall not exceed 10% opacity.
[R307-201]

II.B.8.d The owner/operator shall install boilers that each have low NOx burners certified by the
manufacturer. [R307-401-8]

DAQE-AN104630032-24
Page 13

II.B.8.e The owner/operator shall keep the manufacturer certification for each low NOx burners on site as
long as each boiler is in operation. [R307-401-8]

II.B.8.e.1 To demonstrate compliance with the above condition, the owner/operator shall maintain records
of the manufacturer's emissions guarantee for the installed low-NOx burners. [R307-401-8]

PERMIT HISTORY

This Approval Order shall supersede (if a modification) or will be based on the following documents:

Supersedes AO DAQE-AN104630031-23 dated August 9, 2023
Is Derived From NOI dated March 11, 2024

DAQE-AN104630032-24
Page 14

ACRONYMS

The following lists commonly used acronyms and associated translations as they apply to this document:

40 CFR Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
AO Approval Order
BACT Best Available Control Technology
CAA Clean Air Act
CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments
CDS Classification Data System (used by Environmental Protection Agency to classify
sources by size/type)
CEM Continuous emissions monitor
CEMS Continuous emissions monitoring system
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CMS Continuous monitoring system
CO Carbon monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 98,
Subpart A, Table A-1
COM Continuous opacity monitor
DAQ/UDAQ Division of Air Quality
DAQE This is a document tracking code for internal Division of Air Quality use
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FDCP Fugitive dust control plan
GHG Greenhouse Gas(es) - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations 52.21 (b)(49)(i)
GWP Global Warming Potential - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 86.1818-
12(a)
HAP or HAPs Hazardous air pollutant(s)
ITA Intent to Approve
LB/YR Pounds per year
MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology
MMBTU Million British Thermal Units
NAA Nonattainment Area
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
NOI Notice of Intent
NOx Oxides of nitrogen
NSPS New Source Performance Standard
NSR New Source Review
PM10 Particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PM2.5 Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size
PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration
PTE Potential to Emit
R307 Rules Series 307
R307-401 Rules Series 307 - Section 401
SO2 Sulfur dioxide
Title IV Title IV of the Clean Air Act
Title V Title V of the Clean Air Act
TPY Tons per year
UAC Utah Administrative Code
VOC Volatile organic compounds

DAQE-

RN104630032
April 10, 2024

Andrew Riddick
Henkel Corporation
3540 West 1987 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84104
[e-mail]

Dear Andrew Riddick,

Re: Engineer Review - Administrative Amendment:
Administrative Amendment to Approval Order DAQE-AN104630031-23 to Allow for Organic
Liquids Handling Flexibility under R307-401-12
Project Number: N104630032

The DAQ requests a company representative review and sign the attached Engineer Review (ER). This
ER identifies all applicable elements of the New Source Review (NSR) permitting program. Henkel
Corporation should complete this review within 10 business days of receipt.

Henkel Corporation should contact Christine Bodell at [phone] if there are questions or concerns
with the review of the draft permit conditions. Upon resolution of your concerns, please email Christine
Bodell at [e-mail] the signed cover letter. Upon receipt of the signed cover letter, the DAQ
will prepare an Approval Order (AO) for signature by the DAQ Director.

If Henkel Corporation does not respond to this letter within 10 business days, the project will move
forward without source concurrence. If Henkel Corporation has concerns that cannot be resolved and the
project becomes stagnant, the DAQ Director may issue an Order prohibiting construction.

Approval Signature _____________________________________________________________
(Signature & Date)

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
Department of
Environmental Quality

Kimberly D. Shelley Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird Director

State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX
Governor

DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 1
UTAH DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
ENGINEER REVIEW

SOURCE INFORMATION

Project Number N104630032
Owner Name Henkel Corporation
Mailing Address 3540 West 1987 South
Salt Lake City, UT, 84104

Source Name Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
Source Location 3540 West 1987 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84104

UTM Projection 417,544 m Easting, 4,509,170 m Northing
UTM Datum NAD83
UTM Zone UTM Zone 12
SIC Code 2841 (Soaps & Other Detergent, Except Specialty Cleaners)

Source Contact Andrew Riddick
Phone Number [phone]
Email [e-mail]

Billing Contact Andrew Riddick
Phone Number [phone]
Email [e-mail]

Project Engineer Christine Bodell, Engineer
Phone Number [phone]
Email [e-mail]

Notice of Intent (NOI) Submitted March 11, 2024
Date of Accepted Application March 14, 2024

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 2
SOURCE DESCRIPTION

General Description
Henkel Corporation (Henkel), operates a soap and detergent manufacturing plant in Salt Lake
City. Emissions are primarily associated with particulate matter control equipment and natural
gas combustion in a variety of boilers and emergency generators. Henkel employs baghouses, bin
vents, dust collectors, and scrubbers.

NSR Classification:
Administrative Amendment

Source Classification
Located in Northern Wasatch Front O3 NAA, Salt Lake City UT PM2.5 NAA, Salt Lake County
SO2 NAA
Salt Lake County
Airs Source Size: SM

Applicable Federal Standards
NSPS (Part 60), A: General Provisions
NSPS (Part 60), Dc: Standards of Performance for Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional
Steam Generating Units
NSPS (Part 60), Kb: Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels
(Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or
Modification Commenced After July 23, 1984
NSPS (Part 60), IIII: Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal
Combustion Engines
NSPS (Part 60), JJJJ: Standards of Performance for Stationary Spark Ignition Internal
Combustion Engines
MACT (Part 63), A: General Provisions
MACT (Part 63), ZZZZ: National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

Project Proposal
Administrative Amendment to Approval Order DAQE-AN104630031-23 to Allow for Organic
Liquids Handling Flexibility under R307-401-12

Project Description
Henkel is currently permitted to process a throughput up to 3,495,680 gallons, combined, of
Armosoft DEQ per rolling 12-month period in Tanks 63 & 63A (Condition II.B.6.a in Approval
Order DAQE-AN104630031-23).

The current VOC potential to emit (PTE) of Tanks 63 & 63A were estimated in 2023 by using the
Emission Master Tanks Software based on the 2019 EPA Revision. It was established that
Armosoft DEQ had a true vapor pressure of 34.3 kPa, as determined in a laboratory using New
Source Performance Standard (NSPS)-approved ASTM method 2879. The VOC emitted from
Armosoft is ethanol.

Henkel would like to replace "Armosoft DEQ" with "Volatile Organic Liquid with a true vapor
pressure not to exceed 34.3 kPa". The removal of the specific brand name would provide Henkel
with flexibility to handle other organic liquids with the same or lower true vapor pressure. Henkel

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 3
will not be permitted to handle a volatile organic liquid that contains any VOCs except for
ethanol through Tanks 63 & 63A. Additionally, the volatile organic liquid will not contain any
HAPs. Henkel is not requesting to increase the maximum allowable throughput of Tanks 63 &
63A. Therefore, no emissions are increasing. This project meets the requirements of UAC R307-
401-12 Reduction in Air Pollutants and does not require a public comment period.

EMISSION IMPACT ANALYSIS
This is an administrative amendment under R307-401-12. No changes to equipment or emissions are being
made at this time. Therefore, modeling is not required. [Last updated April 10, 2024]

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 4
SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS

The emissions listed below are an estimate of the total potential emissions from the source. Some
rounding of emissions is possible.

Criteria Pollutant Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
Ammonia 0 0.85
CO2 Equivalent 0 19094.00
Carbon Monoxide 0 13.47
Nitrogen Oxides 0 16.19
Particulate Matter - PM10 0 28.39
Particulate Matter - PM2.5 0 28.27
Sulfur Dioxide 0 0.13
Volatile Organic Compounds 0 9.87

Hazardous Air Pollutant Change (lbs/yr) Total (lbs/yr)
Formaldehyde (CAS #50000) 0 36
Generic HAPs (CAS #GHAPS) 0 35
Glycol Ethers (CAS #EDF109) 0 186
Hexane (CAS #110543) 0 571
Methanol (CAS #67561) 0 634
Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
Total HAPs 0 0.73

Note: Change in emissions indicates the difference between previous AO and proposed modification.

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 5
Review of BACT for New/Modified Emission Units

1. BACT review regarding Removing Brand Name
This is an administrative amendment under R307-401-12. No changes to equipment or emissions
are being made at this time. Therefore, a BACT analysis is not required. [Last updated April 10,
2024]

SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS

The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended
conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the
AO. (New or Modified conditions are indicated as “New” in the Outline Label):

I.1 All definitions, terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in
the UAC R307 and 40 CFR. Unless noted otherwise, references cited in these AO conditions
refer to those rules. [R307-101]

I.2 The limits set forth in this AO shall not be exceeded without prior approval. [R307-401]

I.3 Modifications to the equipment or processes approved by this AO that could affect the
emissions covered by this AO must be reviewed and approved. [R307-401-1]

I.4 All records referenced in this AO or in other applicable rules, which are required to be kept by
the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Director or Director's representative upon
request, and the records shall include the two-year period prior to the date of the request.
Unless otherwise specified in this AO or in other applicable state and federal rules, records
shall be kept for a minimum of two (2) years. [R307-401-8]

I.5 At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners and operators
shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any equipment approved under this AO,
including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air
pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable
operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available
to the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity
observations, review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source.
All maintenance performed on equipment authorized by this AO shall be recorded. [R307-
401-4]

I.6 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-107. General Requirements: Breakdowns.
[R307-107]

I.7 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-150 Series. Emission Inventories. [R307-
150]

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 6
SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT
The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended
conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the
AO. (New or Modified conditions are indicated as “New” in the Outline Label):

II.A THE APPROVED EQUIPMENT

II.A.1 Detergent Manufacturing Plant

II.A.2 Baghouses and Bin Vents- Group #2
Outlet Emissions Rate: 0.02 grains/dscf
Designations: LSL-6, SODA BV-1, LSL-9, LQD-5, LSL-1

Outlet Emissions Rates: 0.007 grains/dscf
Designation: LSL-4

II.A.3 Baghouses and Bin Vents- Group #3
Outlet Emission Rates: 0.005 grains/dscf
Designations: LSL-8

II.A.4 Baghouses and Bin Vents- Group #4
Outlet Emission Rate: 0.016 grains/dscf
Designations: MESBH-1 and MESBV-2

II.A.5 One (1) Scrubber
LSS-3/1
Model: Clean Gas System Size 54

II.A.6 One (1) Conditioning Drum
Designation: LSL-3
Rating: 2.5 MMBtu/hr
Fuel: Natural Gas

II.A.7 Five (5) Boilers
Fuel: Natural Gas
Ratings:
(1) 8.37 MMBtu/hr
(2) 6.4 MMBtu/hr
(3) 0.77 MMBtu/hr
(4) 2.51 MMBtu/hr
(5) 14.0 MMBtu/hr

II.A.8 Five (5) Heat transfer Labelers
Four (4) heat transfer labelers: Four (4) burners each
Labeler Ratings: 0.17 MMBtu/hr Each (42,000 Btu/hr per burner)

One (1) heat transfer labeler: Six (6) burners
Labeler Rating: 0.25 MMBtu/hr Each (42,000 Btu/hr per burner)

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 7
II.A.9 VideoJet coders
Including 32 VideoJet coders

II.A.10 One (1) Emergency Generator Engine
Fuel: Diesel
Engine Rating: 74 hp
Manufacture Year: 2004
NSPS Applicability: None
MACT Applicability: Subpart ZZZZ

II.A.11 One (1) Emergency Generator Engine
Fuel: Natural Gas
Rating: 16 hp
Manufacture Year: 1969
NSPS Applicability: None
MACT Applicability: Subpart ZZZZ

II.A.12 Six (6) Pre-mixers

II.A.13 One (1) Paint booth
Rating: 2,000 scfm equipped
Control: high efficiency over-spray filters

II.A.14 Ethanol and Other Organic Solution Storage Tanks
Tank 52
Capacity: 29,000 gallons
Contents: Citric Acid
NSPS Applicability: None

Tank 60
Capacity: 29,000 gallons
Contents: Denatured Ethanol
NSPS Applicability: None

Tank 63 & Tank 63A
Capacity: 34,000 gallons each
Contents: Volatile Organic Liquid with a True Vapor Pressure not to exceed 34.3 kPa
NSPS Applicability: Subpart Kb

Tank 66
Capacity: 29,000 gallons
Contents: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400
NSPS Applicability: None

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 8
II.A.15 Storage Tanks
Tank 1 (34,000 gallons)
Tank 2 (32,700 gallons)
Tank 21 (21,000 gallons)
Tank 22 (34,000 gallons)
Tank 23 (29,000 gallons)
Tank 27 (34,000 gallons)
Tank 45 (21,000 gallons)
Tank 49 (34,000 gallons)
Tank 65 (34,000 gallons)
Tank 65A (34,000 gallons)

NSPS Applicability: None
Above tanks, except for Tank 2, contain a liquid with a VOC maximum true vapor pressure
less than 15.0 kPa. Tank 2 does not contain a volatile organic liquid.

II.A.16 Two (2) Vacuum pumps
MESVP-1 & MESVP-2
Rating: 704 cfm Each
Model Busch RC1000 for MES conveying system

II.A.17 One (1) Blower
LSL-10
Rating: 600 cfm

II.A.18 Plastic processing equipment
Plastic and additive transfer, storage, mixing and grinding equipment
Control: 13 sock filters

II.A.19 Blow molding equipment
Vents in the blow molding area

II.A.20 Five (5) Electrostatic precipitators
Smog Hog ESP mist collectors in the blow molding area

II.A.21 Six (6) Cooling towers

II.A.22 Four (4) Maintenance shops
Including: parts cleaners, welding equipment, exhaust vents, welding fume collector, and grit
blasting equipment

II.A.23 Hoods
Miscellaneous ventilation hoods in QA labs

II.A.24 Miscellaneous equipment
Liquid transfer, storage and mixing equipment including raw material and product storage
tanks, pumps, vents, blending equipment, and bottle-filling equipment

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 9
SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS
The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended
conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the
AO. (New or Modified conditions are indicated as “New” in the Outline Label):

II.B REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS

II.B.1 Site-Wide Opacity Requirement.
II.B.1.a The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions to exceed 20% opacity unless otherwise
specified within this AO. [R307-401-8]

II.B.1.a.1 Unless otherwise specified in this AO, opacity observations of visible emissions from
stationary sources shall be conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9.
[R307-305-3]

II.B.2 Site-Wide Natural Gas Requirements.
II.B.2.a The owner/operator shall not consume more than 533.7 million scf of natural gas per rolling
12-month period. [R307-401-8]

II.B.2.a.1 The owner/operator shall:

A. Determine consumption by utility billing statements

B. Record consumption on a monthly basis

C. Use the consumption data to calculate a new rolling 12-month total by the 20th day
of each month using data from the previous 12 months

D. Keep the consumption records for all periods the plant is in operation. [R307-401-8]

II.B.3 Liquid Detergent Production Requirements.
II.B.3.a The owner/operator shall not produce more than 1,700,000,000 pounds of liquid detergents
per rolling 12-month period. [R307-401-8]

II.B.3.a.1 The owner/operator shall:

A. Determine production with production records

B. Record production on a daily basis

C. Use the production data to calculate a new rolling 12-month total by the 20th day
of each month using data from the previous 12 months

D. Keep the production records for all periods the plant is in operation. [R307-401-8]

II.B.4 Scrubber Requirements.
II.B.4.a The owner/operator shall maintain the liquid flow rate of Scrubber LSS-3/1 to not be less than
56 gallons/minute. [R307-401-8]

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 10
II.B.4.a.1 The liquid flow rate shall be monitored with a flow meter located such that an
inspector/operator can safely read the output anytime. [R307-401-8]

II.B.4.a.2 The owner/operator shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate each monitoring device
certified by the manufacturer. Calibration shall be on an annual basis according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Daily records of reading shall be maintained. [R307-401-8]

II.B.5 VOC and HAP Requirements.
II.B.5.a The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from the printing press dryers to exceed
10% opacity. [R307-401-8]

II.B.5.b
NEW
The owner/operator shall not emit more than the following from evaporative sources
(painting, printing, coating, and/or cleaning) on site:

8.94 tons of VOC including HAPs per rolling 12-month period
0.43 tons of all other HAPs combined per rolling 12-month period.

[R307-351, R307-401-8]

II.B.5.b.1 The owner/operator shall calculate a new 12-month total by the 20th day of each month using
data from the previous 12 months. The owner/operator shall use a mass-balance method to
calculate emissions from evaporative sources. The owner/operator may use the following
equations with applicable units to comply with the mass-balance method:

VOCs = [% VOCs by Weight/100] x [Density] x [Volume Consumed]

HAP = [% HAP by Weight/100] x [Density] x [Volume Consumed]. [R307-401-8]

II.B.5.b.2 The owner/operator shall keep records each month of the following:

A. The name (as per the Safety Data Sheet) of the VOC- and HAP-emitting material

B. The maximum percent by weight of VOCs and each HAP in each material used

C. The density of each material used

D. The volume of each VOC- and HAP-emitting material used

E. The amount of VOCs and the amount of each HAP emitted from each material

F. The amount of VOCs and the amount of each HAP reclaimed and/or controlled from
each material

G. The total amount of VOCs, the total amount of each HAP, and the total amount of
all HAPs combined emitted from all materials (in tons). [R307-401-8]

II.B.5.c The owner/operator shall store VOC- or HAP-containing materials and VOC- or HAP-laden
rags in covered containers except when in use. [R307-401-8]

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 11
II.B.5.d The owner/operator shall comply with the applicable requirements in R307-325 and R307-
335. [R307-325, R307-335]

II.B.6 Storage Tank (Storage Vessel) Requirements
II.B.6.a
NEW
The owner/operator shall not process more than the following throughput for the indicated
tanks:

A. Tank 52: 63,50,000 gallons of Citric Acid per rolling 12-month period

B. Tank 60: 606,466 gallons of Ethanol per rolling 12-month period

C. Tanks 63 & 63A: 3,495,680 gallons, combined, of volatile organic liquids with a true
vapor pressure no more than 34.3 kPa per rolling 12-month period

D. Tank 66: 63,510,000 gallons of PEG 400 per rolling 12-month period

[R307-401-8]

II.B.6.a.1
NEW
The owner/operator shall:

A. Determine the volume processed through each tank using process flow meters and/or
sales records.

B. Determine true vapor pressure with ASTM Method 2879

C. Record the volume processed through each tank on a daily basis.

D. Use the monthly volume processed through each tank records to calculate a new
12-month total by the 20th day of each month using data from the previous 12
months.

E. Keep the volume processed through each tank records for all periods the plant is in
operation.

[R307-401-8]

II.B.6.b
NEW
The owner/operator shall not process a volatile organic liquid that contains any HAP and/or
VOC except for ethanol through Tanks 63 & 63A. [R307-401-8]

II.B.6.b.1
NEW
To demonstrate compliance with the above condition, the owner/operator shall maintain
records of the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for the organic liquid. [R307-401-8]

II.B.6.c The owner/operator shall keep the storage tank thief hatches and other tank openings closed
and sealed except during tank unloading or other maintenance activities. [R307-401-8]

II.B.6.d The owner/operator shall install a carbon canister of both Tank 63 and Tank 63A with a
control efficiency of no less than 95%. [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb, R307-401-8]

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 12
II.B.6.d.1 To demonstrate compliance with the above condition, the owner/operator shall maintain
records of the manufacturer's emissions guarantee for the installed carbon canister filters.
[R307-401-8]

II.B.6.e The owner/operator shall inspect and replaced the carbon canisters in accordance with the
manufacturer's recommendations to ensure the 95% control efficiency is met. [R307-401-8]

II.B.7 Baghouses and Bin Vents Requirements.
II.B.7.a The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from baghouses and bin vents to exceed
10% opacity. [R307-305, R307-401-8]

II.B.7.b The owner/operator shall install a manometer or magnehelic pressure gauge to measure the
pressure drop across each baghouse filter. [R307-401-8]

II.B.7.b.1 The pressure gauges shall be located such that a UDAQ representative/operator can safely
read the indicator at any time. [R307-401-8]

II.B.7.b.2 The pressure gauges shall each measure the pressure drop in 1-inch water column increments
or less. [R307-401-8]

II.B.7.c During operation of the baghouses, the owner/operator shall maintain the static pressure drop
across each baghouse between 1.0 and 6.0 inches of water column. [R307-401-8]

II.B.7.c.1 The owner/operator shall record the pressure drop at least once per operating day while each
baghouse is operating. [R307-401-8]

II.B.7.c.2 The owner/operator shall maintain the following records of the pressure drop readings:

A. Unit identification;

B. Date of reading;

C. Daily pressure drop readings.

[R307-401-8]

II.B.7.d At least once every 12 months, the owner/operator shall calibrate the pressure gauges in
accordance with the manufacturer's instructions or replace the gauges. [R307-401-8]

II.B.7.d.1 The owner/operator shall maintain records of all pressure gauge calibrations and replacements.
[R307-401-8]

II.B.8 Combustion Equipment Requirements.
II.B.8.a The owner/operator shall not operate each emergency engine on site for more than 100 hours
per calendar year for maintenance checks and readiness testing. Each emergency engine on
site may be operated for up to 50 hours per calendrer year in non-emergency situations. Any
operation in non-emergency situations shall be counted as part of the 100 hours per calendar
year for maintenance and testing. There is no time limit on the use of the engines during
emergencies. [40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ, R307-401-8]

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 13
II.B.8.a.1 To determine compliance with the annual operation limitation, records documenting the
operation of each emergency engine shall be kept in a log and shall include the following:

A. The date the emergency engine was used

B. The duration of operation in hours

C. The reason for the emergency engine usage. [R307-401-8]

II.B.8.a.2 To determine the duration of operation, the owner/operator shall install a non-resettable hour
meter for each emergency engine. [R307-401-8]

II.B.8.b The owner/operator shall only use diesel fuel (e.g. fuel oil #1, #2, or diesel fuel oil additives)
as fuel in the 74 hp emergency engine. The owner/operator shall only use natural gas as fuel
in the conditioning drum heater, the 16 hp emergency engine, and all the boilers, water
heaters, and heat transfer labelers. [R307-401-8]

II.B.8.b.1 The owner/operator shall only combust diesel fuel that meets the definition of ultra-low sulfur
diesel (ULSD), which has a sulfur content of 15 ppm or less. [R307-401-8]

II.B.8.b.2 To demonstrate compliance with the ULSD fuel requirement, the owner/operator shall
maintain records of diesel fuel purchase invoices or obtain certification of sulfur content from
the diesel fuel supplier. The diesel fuel purchase invoices shall indicate that the diesel fuel
meets the ULSD requirements. [R307-401-8]

II.B.8.c Visible emissions from all natural gas combustion equipment shall not exceed 10% opacity.
[R307-201]

II.B.8.d The owner/operator shall install boilers that each have low NOx burners certified by the
manufacturer. [R307-401-8]

II.B.8.e The owner/operator shall keep the manufacturer certification for each low NOx burners on site
as long as each boiler is in operation. [R307-401-8]

II.B.8.e.1 To demonstrate compliance with the above condition, the owner/operator shall maintain
records of the manufacturer's emissions guarantee for the installed low-NOx burners. [R307-
401-8]

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 14
PERMIT HISTORY

When issued, the approval order shall supersede (if a modification) or will be based on the
following documents:

Supersedes AO DAQE-AN104630031-23 dated August 9, 2023
Is Derived From NOI dated March 11, 2024

REVIEWER COMMENTS

1. Comment regarding Federal Applicability (NSPS):
40 CFR Part 60 (NSPS) Subpart Dc (Standards of Performance for Small Industrial-Commercial-
Institutional Steam Generating Units)

Subpart Dc applies to owners and operators of steam generating units for which construction,
modification, or reconstruction is commenced after June 9, 1989 and that has a maximum design
heat input capacity of 100 million British thermal units per hour (MMBtu/hr) or less, but greater than
or equal to 10 MMBtu/hr. Steam generating unit means a device that combusts any fuel and
produces steam or heats water or heats any heat transfer medium. Henkel has miscellaneous boilers
and a water heater that are subject to this subpart. Therefore, NSPS Subpart Dc applies to this
facility.

40 CFR Part 60 (NSPS) Subpart Kb (Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage
Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or
Modification Commenced After July 23, 1984)

The affected facilities to which this subpart applies is each storage vessel with a capacity greater
than or equal to 75 cubic meters (19,813 gallons) that is used to store volatile organic liquids (VOL)
for which construction, reconstruction, or modification is commenced after July 23, 1984. This
subpart does not apply to storage vessels with a capacity greater than or equal to 151 cubic meters
(39,890 gallons) storing a liquid with a maximum true vapor pressure less than 3.5 kilopascals (kPa)
or with a capacity greater than or equal to 75 cubic meters (19,813 gallons) but less than 151 cubic
meters (39890 gallons) storing a liquid with a maximum true vapor pressure less than 15.0 kPa.
Only two of the six storage tanks apply to this NSPS standard:

Tank 1 (Sulfonic Acid), Tank 65 (70% SLES), Tank 65A (70% SLES) - Each tank has a capacity of
32,700 gallons, but contains contents with a maximum true vapor pressure of less than 15.0 kPa.
Therefore, Subpart Kb does not apply to Tank 1, Tank 65, and Tank 65A.

Tank 2 (Sodium Silicate Liquid Alkaline) - This tank does not contain a volatile organic liquid.
Therefore, Subpart Kb does not apply to Tank 2.

Tanks 63 and 63A (Organic Liquid w/Ethanol) - Each tank has a capacity of 32,700 gallons and
contains contents exceeding a maximum true vapor pressure of 15.0 kPa. Therefore, Subpark Kb
applies to Tank 63 and Tank 63A. [Last updated April 10, 2024]

2. Comment regarding Federal Applicability (MACT):
40 CFR Part 63 (MACT) Subpart ZZZZ (Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression
Ignition Internal Combustion Engines)

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 15
All stationary engines on site are subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZ National Emissions
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines).
The provisions of Subpart ZZZZ apply as the stationary reciprocating internal combustion engine
(RICE) is at an area source of HAP emissions and are applicable to one (1) diesel-fired, 74 HP,
emergency generator engine and one (1) natural gas-fired, 16 HP, emergency engine. Each engine is
not designated as nonroad, is not exempt, and is an affected sources under this regulation. The
stationary engines on site that are subject to Subpart ZZZZ must meet the requirements of Subpart
IIII. No further requirements apply to the engines under Subpart ZZZZ.
[Last updated March 13, 2024]

3. Comment regarding Title V Applicability:
Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act (Title V) applies to the following:

1. Any major source
2. Any source subject to a standard, limitation, or other requirement under Section 111 of the Act,
Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources;
3. Any source subject to a standard or other requirement under Section 112 of the Act, Hazardous
Air Pollutants.
4. Any Title IV affected source.

This facility is not a major source and is not a Title IV source. The facility is not subject to 40 CFR
61 (NESHAP) regulations. This facility is subject to 40 CFR 60 (NSPS) Subparts A, Dc, and Kb and
40 CFR 63 (MACT) Subparts A and ZZZZ. NSPS Subparts Dc and Kb do not specifically exempt
the facility from the obligation to obtain a Title V permit. However, this facility is only subject to
record-keeping requirements under NSPS Subparts Dc and Kb, and is not subject to a standard or
limitation. Therefore, this facility is not a Title V source.

[Last updated March 13, 2024]

Engineer Review N104630032: Henkel Corporation- Detergent Manufacturing Plant
April 10, 2024
Page 16
ACRONYMS
The following lists commonly used acronyms and associated translations as they apply to this
document:
40 CFR Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
AO Approval Order
BACT Best Available Control Technology
CAA Clean Air Act
CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments
CDS Classification Data System (used by EPA to classify sources by size/type)
CEM Continuous emissions monitor
CEMS Continuous emissions monitoring system
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CMS Continuous monitoring system
CO Carbon monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent - 40 CFR Part 98, Subpart A, Table A-1
COM Continuous opacity monitor
DAQ/UDAQ Division of Air Quality
DAQE This is a document tracking code for internal UDAQ use
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FDCP Fugitive dust control plan
GHG Greenhouse Gas(es) - 40 CFR 52.21 (b)(49)(i)
GWP Global Warming Potential - 40 CFR Part 86.1818-12(a)
HAP or HAPs Hazardous air pollutant(s)
ITA Intent to Approve
LB/HR Pounds per hour
LB/YR Pounds per year
MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology
MMBTU Million British Thermal Units
NAA Nonattainment Area
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
NOI Notice of Intent
NOx Oxides of nitrogen
NSPS New Source Performance Standard
NSR New Source Review
PM10 Particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PM2.5 Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size
PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration
PTE Potential to Emit
R307 Rules Series 307
R307-401 Rules Series 307 - Section 401
SO2 Sulfur dioxide
Title IV Title IV of the Clean Air Act
Title V Title V of the Clean Air Act
TPY Tons per year
UAC Utah Administrative Code
VOC Volatile organic compounds

Page 1 Revision 2

October 14, 2022

Attn: Permitting
Utah Division of Air Quality
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84116

RE: Notice of Intent – Revision 2
Modification to Approval Order DAQE-AN104630029-19
Henkel US Operations Corporation
Salt Lake City, Utah

Dear Sir/Madam,

Henkel US Operations Corporation ("Henkel") is submitting this Revision 2 to the last
Notice of Intent (NOI) for a minor New Source Review revision to its Approval Order
(AO) DAQE-AN104630029-19. The appropriate NOI application forms are included in
Appendix A of this application. The changes requested follow.

This revision corrects inconsistences found in earlier NOI submissions and responds to
questions directed to Ms. Suzy Smith of ERM, Henkel’s environmental consultant, from
Ms. Christine Bodell in an email dated July 29, 2022. The items highlighted in green
pertain to revisions to the most recent version of this NOI. The items highlighted in
yellow pertain to items revised in Revision 1.

Henkel requests that Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) include serial numbers to
equipment where stated in this permit application when updating the AO. Names to
equipment potentially change at the facility; however, serial numbers remain constant.
Also, if UDAQ perceives no benefit to the UDAQ or Henkel in grouping air pollution
control devices in the AO, such grouping can be omitted. It is not apparent that the
groups in the AO serve a purpose.

A change in the Potential to Emit (PTE) attributed to the following:
• The PTE formerly included a R&D Laboratory. Emissions from this source are
removed from the PTE analysis because the site does not have a R&D
Laboratory.
• The PTE formerly included carton printing. Emissions from this source are
removed from the PTE analysis because the site does not conduct carton
printing.

Page 2 Revision 2

• The PTE formerly included refrigerant leaks from air conditioners and chillers
subject to 40 CFR 82, which are normally not subject to air permitting. These
emissions are removed from the PTE analysis.
• LDQ-7 baghouse of Group 2 in the AO was removed from service because the
process it was serving was removed.
• LSL-7 Pkg GV Unit baghouse of Group 3 in the AO was removed from service
because the process it was serving was removed.
• SAS-1 Soda Ash Scrubber in the AO was removed from service.
• LQD-4 baghouse was removed from service because the process it was serving
was removed.
• LQD-5 baghouse was added in the NOI because this baghouse was brought
online. LQD-5 baghouse parameters have been revised from Revision 1.
• LSL-1 baghouse, which services the Agglomerator 3 room, was added.
• The PTE for the facility now accounts for the emissions from 13 sock filters that
service plastic regrind operations, and vent outdoors.
• The PTE includes information for five fabric filters that vent indoors. These filters
are not considered emission points by the UDAQ. This was included in this NOI
for completeness, but is assumed to have negligible particulate matter emissions
to the environment; and therefore not included in the PTE.
• Two Conditioning Drum Heaters were removed, leaving one remaining. The
remaining Conditioning Drum is LSL-3 with a heat input capacity of 2.5
MMBtu/hr.
• Three of the five permitted boilers on site were removed. The rated heat input
capacity of each of the boilers is 2.08 MMBtu/hr, 2.08 MMBtu/hr, and 14
MMBtu/hr. The 7.3 MMBtu/hr LQD3PV01, included in the Initial NOI version, is a
pressure vessel used for the 200 HP Steam Boiler. LQD3PV01 is not a boiler.
• The Armstrong Flo Direct Water Heater with a heat input capacity of 14
MMBtu/hr was removed. This 14 MMBtu/hr Armstrong Flo Direct Water Heater
was not removed, it is still in operation.
• Addition of a 0.77 MMBtu/hr Parker Boiler.
• Addition of a 1.62 MMBtu/hr Bessamaire Direct Industrial Air Handling Unit.
• Correction of permitted Parker Boiler from the 6.4 MMBtu/hr to 6.3 MMBtu/hr.
• The 13.05 MMBtu/hr miscellaneous boilers were removed.
• Removal of two Natural Gas Emergency Generator Engines (33 HP and 255 HP).
• Addition of an existing 16 HP Natural Gas Emergency Engine on the AO is
requested.
• Correction of the Diesel Emergency Generator Engine rating from 79 HP to 74
HP.

Page 3 Revision 2

• Correction of the description of the heat transfer labelers to 5 heat transfer
labelers, each with four burners and 1 heat transfer labeler with six burners
(each burner has a rated heat input capacity of 42,000 Btu/hr for a total of
1,092,000 Btu/hr).
• Accounted for the permitted Paint Booth. This paint booth is currently used for
maintenance. Maintenance uses this paint booth to spray miscellaneous parts
with aerosol spray paint cans. Henkel wishes to retain the paint booth in UDAQ
records.
• Accounted for unloading of soda ash and salt from railcar fugitive emissions.
Emissions were quantified using AP-42 Emission Factors for Aggregate Handling
and Storage Piles.
• Addition of six pre-mixers were added to the existing two, four are currently in
use. Six can potentially be used to prepare a solution of the optical brightener.
The pre-mixers are a source of particulate matter and when using the optical
brightener, the solution can emit a hazardous air pollutant (HAP). Emissions
occur from charging of solids into the pre-mixer. The mixed solution is piped to
its mixing tank downstream for use in formulation.
• The PTE for natural gas emissions was based on the heat input capacity of each
boiler or heater rather than the allowable site natural gas use of 533.7 million scf
per rolling 12-month period. The PTE of the collective annual maximum design
natural gas use was less than the allowable site natural gas use.
• Repurposing Storage Tanks 63 and 63A, which contain Armosoft DEQ. Armosoft
DEQ contains ethanol and is stored at an elevated temperature. These two tanks
will be subject to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb. The controlled emissions from these
sources are now quantified in the PTE.
• Emissions from Tanks 63, 63A, and 60 were adjusted to reflect EPA’s 2019
revision to calculation methodologies.
• Addition of Storage Tanks 65 and 65A, which will contain 70% SLES, and Storage
Tank 1, which contains Sulfonic Acid. SLES and sulfonic acid contain organic
material, but have low or no volatility with negligible if any VOC emissions at the
storage tank operating temperature.
• Addition of Storage Tank 2, which contains Sodium Silicate Liquid Alkaline.
Sodium Silicate Liquid Alkaline is an inorganic material that has low to no
volatility.
• The PTE estimates account for potential emissions of Dimethyl Formamide, a
Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP), which can be present in low quantities in optical
brightener. Optical brightener is a solid material charged in pre-mixers. Some of

Page 4 Revision 2

the pre-mixers are controlled with fabric filters. For quantifying PTE, the PM
from charging the pre-mixers is assumed uncontrolled. (Reworded)
• The Summary sheet was updated and corrected in this revision.
o Revised the Emergency Engine emissions in the Summary PTE Table to
match the detailed summaries in the Emergency Engine Sheet.
o Accounted for an additional baghouse, corrected parameters on another
baghouse, removed a soda ash scrubber, and included emissions from 13
fabric filters (sock filters).
o Added missing boilers and removed obsolete boilers.
o Accounted for maintenance paint booth emissions.
o Accounted for railcar unloading fugitive emissions.
o Quantified controlled emissions from the carbon canisters on Tanks 63
and 63A.
o Revised Emission Master Tanks Software to calculate breathing and
working losses from Tanks 60, 63, and 63A based on EPA’s 2019 revision.
FACILITY DESCRIPTION

Henkel operates under AO DAQE-AN104630029-19, issued December 5, 2019. This AO is
for a minor source of emissions. The stationary source manufactures soap and
detergent products. Henkel formulates its product in blending systems. The stationary
source uses storage tanks, mixing vessels, boilers, emergency generators, and a printing
operation that adds dates to a label purchased to support production. A site layout is
provided in Appendix B.

The stationary source is located in Salt Lake County, which is a:
• Serious non-attainment area for PM2.5
• A primary and secondary non-attainment area for SO2
• A 2015 8-hour ozone non-attainment area to the Southern Wasatch Front of
Salt Lake County.

PROJECT

A summary of the PTE in the permit and in this permit application is provided in Table 1
below. The supporting calculations for the site’s PTE is detailed in Appendix C.

Page 5 Revision 2

Table 1. Potential to Emit
Regulated Air Pollutant Current AO This NOI Change
Criteria Pollutants in tons per year
Ammonia 0.85 0.85 0.00
CO2 Equivalent 32,813.27 19,088.32 -13,724.95
Carbon Monoxide 4.871 13.47 +8.60
Nitrogen Oxides 21.95 16.05 -5.90
Particulate Matter–PM10 20.93 29.12 +8.19
Particulate Matter-PM2.5 20.92 28.99 +8.07
Sulfur Dioxide 0.16 0.13 -0.03
Volatile Organic Compounds 11.48 9.91 -1.57
Hazardous Air Pollutant in tons per year
Formaldehyde (CAS #50000) 0.023 0.018 -0.005
Generic HAPs (CAS #GHAPS)2 0.010 0.010 0.00
Glycol Ethers (CAS #EDF109) 0.093 0.093 0.00
Hexane (CAS #110543) 0.481 0.286 -0.195
Methanol (CAS #67561) 0.317 0.317 +0.00
Trichloroethylene (CAS #79016) 3.90 0.00 -3.90
Total HAP in tons per year3 4.82 0.723 -4.10
1 Incorrectly transcribed from the previous NOI used to develop this table in the AO
2 The generic HAP is attributed to liquid formulation where any HAP can occur.
3 The total HAP PTE at the facility was calculated to be 6.16 tons per year. The UDAQ
Form 5 reflects the total calculated PTE of 6.16 tons per year too. The PTE in the Table 1
reflects the sum of the PTE for only the HAP currently listed in the AO and changes with
respect to those HAP.

The following describes changes Henkel wishes to include in its modified AO.

Accounting for Potential PM and HAP from Charging Optical Brightener in a Pre-Mixer
Henkel charges six pre-mixers with solid materials to prepare formulation for later use
downstream in the mixing tanks. Of the six, four are in use and two are out of service. A
pre-determined amount of solids materials is poured into the pre-mixers and result in
dust emissions. The pre-mixers are operated in batches with a minimum batch time of 4
hours. A maximum of 1,000 pounds of solid material is charged into a pre-mixer per
batch. For worst-case scenario for HAP emissions, the solids material optical brightener
is assumed to be used in the six pre-mixers. The optical brightener, Tinopal contains up
to 0.2% dimethyl formamide. The PTE PM and HAP is based on uncontrolled emissions.
A Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for the current brand of optical brightener (Tinopal) is
included in Appendix D.

Page 6 Revision 2

Negligibly Volatile Organic Liquid Material in New Storage Tanks
Henkel is installing three new storage tanks, which will contain organic liquids. Storage
Tanks 65 and 65A will contain 70% SLES. The organic component in this material has a
high molar mass, which is not conducive to evaporation. The VOC emissions from these
tanks are negligible, if at all volatile. The SLES will be stored at 130ºF to maintain low
viscosity of the liquid for adequate flow. Despite the additional heat, the molecular mass
of the SLES will still lack the fugacity to escape the liquid surface into the air. Storage
Tank 1 will contain sulfonic acid. Sulfonic acid is also an organic liquid with low volatility
due to its high molar mass and the ability of the sulfonic acid to dissociate in water. The
SLES and sulfonic acid SDS are provided in Appendix D. The range of the chemical molar
mass in these mixture can be deduced from the information in the SDS.

New Inorganic Liquid Storage Tank
Additionally, Tank 2 will be installed and will store sodium silicate liquid alkaline. The
SDS in Appendix D shows that this material does not contain organic compounds.
Additionally, this material does not emit regulated air pollutants.

Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Tanks
Two 34,000-gallon storage tanks, Tank 63 and Tank 63A will be repurposed to store
Armosoft DEQ. Armosoft DEQ contains a heavy organic molecule mixed with ethanol.
Ethanol is a volatile organic liquid. The Armosoft DEQ will be stored at 160 ºF. This
storage temperature will cause the material to evaporate at a vapor pressure of 34.3
kilopascals, as determined in a laboratory by use of the New Source Performance
Standard (NSPS)-approved ASTM method. These two storage tanks will be subject to
add-on air pollution control requirements as provided in the NSPS, 40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb
for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Tanks. The SDS for Armosoft DEQ is provided in
Appendix D.

MAXIMUM EMISSIONS QUANTIFICATION

PM and HAP Emissions from Charging Solids into the Pre-Mixer
There are eight pre-mixers onsite, which will be charged with solid materials. Six of the
eight pre-mixers will be charged with the optical brightener, Tinopal, which contains a
HAP, 0.2% by weight dimethyl formamide. The pre-mixers operate in batches, with a
batch time of 4 hours and a maximum solids charge rate of 1,000 pounds per batch. For
the maximum emissions from the source, it was assumed that all eight pre-mixers will
be charged with the optical brightener with a maximum of 2,190 batches per year at a
rate of 1,000 pounds per batch. The emission factor for loading of solids into the pre-
mixers was quantified by the method described in AP-42, Section 13.2.4: Aggregate
Handling and Storage Piles and selected as the optimum method to represent the

Page 7 Revision 2

charging of pre-mixers with solids material. This method is based on the velocity of the
downward pour of the material will be stripped of dust from the shearing forces of air
interfacing with the solids particles. The maximum air shearing speed as the solids
material as it reaches the end of a 12-foot drop was used in the method where wind
speed is required. The annual PTE from PM-10 and PM-2.5 for the facility is 0.19 tons
per year and 0.03 tons per year, respectively. The HAP emissions from the use of the
optical brightener, were conservatively derived from particulate matter emissions with
an aerodynamic diameter less than 30 μm. The annual PTE from HAP is 0.0008 tons per
year.

Organic Liquid Storage Tanks
The air emissions from Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) from Storage Tanks 63 and
63A are attributed to the ethanol ingredient in the Armosoft DEQ material. Other
organic matter is present in the material, but the high molar mass of these components
result in negligible vapor pressures, if any. Tank 60, which contains 200-Proof Denatured
Ethanol, will have VOC emissions from the ethanol and the isopropyl alcohol component
in the material. Other organic compounds exist in trace amounts. Tank 60 is an existing
tank.

The SDS for the Armosoft DEQ material did not list any Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)
as ingredients in the material stored. The 200-Proof Denatured Ethanol SDS listed trace
amounts of acetone, methanol and acetaldehyde. These HAP are in trace amounts and
will release a negligible amount of emissions. Therefore, the released vapors from both
tanks did not include HAP emissions from the trace amounts.

The Emission Master Model for Storage Tanks was used to quantify uncontrolled VOC
releases from Tanks 63, 63A, and 60. The storage tank characteristics that were used in
the model are provided in Table 2. The vapor pressure of the Armosoft DEQ was based
on laboratory-generated data, attached in Appendix E. For the Armosoft Storage Tanks,
the model developed Antoine Equation coefficients based on the laboratory-measured
vapor pressures with corresponding temperatures. For the 200-proof ethanol storage
tank, the ethanol and isopropyl alcohol vapor pressures were supplied by the model’s
database. The maximum annual throughput for each tank used in the model, was
calculated from the forecasted throughput of each material from June 2022 to May
2023. The highest monthly forecast throughput was multiplied by 12 months and a 15%
margin was added, to calculate the maximum annual throughput. The model report
outputs appear in Appendix F.

Page 8 Revision 2

Table 2. Emission Master Model Inputs
Parameter Tank 63 Tank 63A Tank 60
Contents Armosoft
DEQ
Armosoft
DEQ
200-Proof Denatured
Ethanol
Capacity (gal) 34,000 34,000 29,000
Tank Roof Cone Cone Cone
Shell Height (ft) 34.5 34.5 26
Shell Diameter (ft) 13 13 14
Temperature (ºF) 160 160 85.7
Max. Annual Throughput
(gal/yr)
1,747,840 1,747,840 606,466

Additionally, the VOC emissions from tanks 66 and 52 were analyzed. Tank 66 has a
capacity of 29,000 gallons and contains the material PEG 400, which contains 100%
polyethylene glycol (PEG). Tank 52 has a capacity of 29,000 gallons and will contain a
citric acid solution. VOC emissions were calculated using an EPA formula developed for
splash filling a container (not submerged filling). The emissions occur as the saturated
air in the headspace is displaced during filling of the mixing tank. Calculations are
summarized in Appendix C.

NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARD NOTIFICATIONS

Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Tanks - 40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb
Four new storage tanks and two repurposed tanks are included in this NOI. Only two of
the six storage tanks apply to this NSPS standard. A summary of the applicability is
provided in Table 3.

Page 9 Revision 2

Table 3. Applicability of the Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Tank NSPS
Storage
Tank ID
Content Applicability
Tank 1 Sulfonic Acid Not applicable - 40 CFR §60.110b(b)
states that storage tanks with an
organic liquid true vapor pressure <
15.0 KPa or more in a storage tank with
a capacity between 20,000 gallons and
39,800 gallons is not applicable to the
standard.
Tank 2 Sodium Silicate Liquid Alkaline Not applicable – This material does not
contain an organic liquid.
Tank 63 Armosoft DEQ Applicable - 40 CFR §60.110b(a) states that
storage tanks with holding a volatile
organic liquid with a capacity that
exceeds 20,000 gallons and does not
meet the exclusion in 40 CFR
§60.110b(b) is subject to the standard.
Tank 63A Armosoft DEQ Applicable - 40 CFR §60.110b(a) states that
storage tanks with holding a volatile
organic liquid with a capacity that
exceeds 20,000 gallons and does not
meet the exclusion in 40 CFR
§60.110b(b) is subject to the standard.
Tank 65 70% SLES Not applicable - 40 CFR §60.110b(b)
states that storage tanks with an
organic liquid true vapor pressure <
15.0 KPa or more in a storage tank with
a capacity between 20,000 gallons and
39,800 gallons is not applicable to the
standard.
Tank 65A 70% SLES Not applicable - 40 CFR §60.110b(b)
states that storage tanks with an
organic liquid true vapor pressure <
15.0 KPa or more in a storage tank with
a capacity between 20,000 gallons and
39,800 gallons is not applicable to the
standard.

The commencement of construction notification of 40 CFR §60.7(a)(1) does not apply to
Storage Tanks 65 and 65A since these storage tanks have already been constructed and

Page 10 Revision 2

existing units repurposed for the storage of Armosoft DEQ. However, the notification in
40 CFR §60.7(a)(4) applies because a change in the material used in these two tanks are
subjecting the units to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb. Such notification shall be postmarked 60
days or as soon as practicable before the change is commenced. This notice contains the
following:

Nature of the change: Repurposed storage tanks
Proposed emission control system: Carbon canister with closed vent
Productive capacity of the facility: > 1,747,840 gallons throughput/yr/storage tank
Expected completion date for storage of affected material: Unknown

Regulatory Analysis

Each of the Tanks 63 and 63A will have a capacity of 34,000 gallons. The New Source
Performance Standard for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage in 40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb
applies to this project because according to 40 CFR §60.110b(b), the true vapor pressure
of the VOC in the heated Tanks 63 and 63A is more than the applicability threshold of
15.0 kPa. Table 4 Provides the true vapor pressures interpolated from a laboratory
analysis performed on the storage tanks’ content. The vapor pressures are due to the
ethanol component in the materials stored in the tanks at the tanks operating
temperature. The ethanol composition is provided in the SDS in Appendix D.

Table 4. Vapor Pressures of Materials in the Two Storage Tanks
Tank ID Material Maximum
Storage
Temperature (°F)
Maximum True
Vapor Pressure*
(kPa)
63 Armosoft DEQ 160 34.3
63A Armosoft DEQ 160 34.3
*Reduced from Marion Laboratories analysis for vapor pressure performed in
accordance with ASTM D2879 in a report generated on February 17, 2022. The analysis
appears in Appendix E.

Implementing Compliance with 40 CFR 63 SUBPART Kb

The NSPS requires the use of an air pollution control device that can achieve a minimum
of 95% VOC control efficiency (40 CFR 60.112b(a)(3)(ii)). Henkel will use a carbon canister
on each storage tank and will replace them when breakthrough occurs. An operating
plan, as per the New Source Performance Standard, 40 CFR §60.113b(c)(1) is prepared
and attached in Appendix G for approval. The approved plan will be implemented and
maintained onsite by Henkel.

Page 11 Revision 2

The volatile component of the materials stored in Tanks 63 and 63A is ethanol, which is
a volatile organic liquid. These storage tanks have a fixed roof and have previously been
uncontrolled. These tanks were found to be subject to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb
requirements due to the heating of the tank increasing vapor pressure of the volatile
organic liquid

The Operating Plan demonstrates that the control device will achieve the required
control efficiency during maximum loading conditions. The Plan includes a description of
the gas stream, which enters the control device, including flow and VOC content under
varying liquid level conditions (dynamic and static) and the manufacturer's design
specifications for the control device. The Plan also addresses monitoring for leaks in the
closed vent system leading to the air-pollution control device as well as monitoring
practices assuring compliance with the 95% control efficiency of the air-pollution control
device.

Henkel is satisfied that the air-pollution control devices meet the requirements of 40
CFR 60 Subpart Kb.

Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines – 40 CFR 60 Subpart JJJJ
An existing natural gas fueled 2-cycle lean burn engine is included in this NOI because it
is not included in the AO. This is a 16 HP Briggs and Stratton Model 303775 engine. The
Model Year 1969. This engine is used to drive an emergency generator. According to 40
CFR §60.4230(a)(4)(iii), this engine does not apply to this NSPS because it was manufactured
prior to July 1, 2008.

NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS

Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines – 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ
Henkel is adding an existing 1969 Model Year 16 HP natural gas fueled emergency
engine not previously included on the AO. The Henkel facility is an area source of
emissions. According to 40 CFR §63.6590(a)(1)(iii), this emergency engine is an existing
source because it was constructed before June 12, 2006.

BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (BACT) ANALYSIS

In accordance with Utah Admin. Code 307-401-8, Henkel is completing a Best Available
Control Technology (BACT) Analysis for the new and modified equipment proposed in
this project (new pre-mixer, four new storage tanks and two modified storage tanks).
Baghouse LQD-5 brought online is an existing unit that replaced an older baghouse. The
new storage tanks are storage Tanks 65, 65A, 1, and 2. Tanks 63 and 63A (subject to 40
CFR 63, Subpart Kb), will be modified and therefore evaluated for BACT. In addition, a

Page 12 Revision 2

cost feasibility analysis was performed for the new pre-mixing operations at the facility.
Four New Storage Tanks with Respect to VOC Emissions
There are four new storage tanks proposed in this application. Tanks 65 and 65A will
each contain SLES 70%. This material is a solid at room temperature, has a high molar
mass, and a high boiling point, which will not result in VOC emissions at the storage
tanks elevated operating temperature. Tank 1 will contain Linear Alkylbenzene Sulfonic
Acid (LAS). This material has 18 carbons and a high molar mass which is not conducive to
an appreciable amount of evaporation, if any. In addition, this molecule has strong
intermolecular bonds, an aromatic end and a straight alkene end which tend to form
micelles like oil. Tank 2 will contain Sodium Silicate Liquid Alkaline, which does not
contain any organic compounds. All four tanks will emit negligible uncontrolled VOC
emissions, if any. Therefore, a cost analysis for potential air pollution control devices is
not feasible for negligible to no VOC volatility.
Two Modified Storage Tanks with Respect to VOC Emissions
Tanks 63 and 63A are subject to NSPS because they will contain volatile organic liquids
at elevated temperatures. The NSPS rule requires that an air pollution control device
with a minimum control efficiency of 95% be installed (40 CFR 60.112b(a)(3)(ii)). Due to
the low maximum VOC emission rate of 0.34 ton VOC per year per tank, this air
pollution device will qualify for BACT as well. From the pricing quote for the carbon
canisters at the Henkel Bowling Green site, provided by Industrial Air Purification, Inc.
(IAP), the cost per carbon canister is $13,456.80. The quote is included in Appendix H.
Assuming the installed cost doubles the cost of the canister, the total cost per canister is
$26,913.60. The controlled VOC emissions from each tank, fitted with a carbon canister
with a control efficiency of 95% is 0.017 ton VOC per year. The cost per ton of VOC
removed for each carbon canister is $83,045.36. In conclusion, the cost effectiveness
and the carbon canisters is too high and can be eliminated as an option for BACT. The
majority of the time, the VOC emissions will represent 0.65% of the annual modeled
VOC emissions of 0.34 tons per year due to breathing losses. The number of tank fills
per year (turnovers) is estimated to be 51.4. This means tanks are filled approximately
weekly. Assuming a 3.4-hour period to fill a tank (based on a fill rate of 10,000 gallons
per hour), this means that 99.35% of the emissions occur over 174.8 hours of the year.
The majority of the VOC emissions occur during storage tank filling. Other options such
as carbon adsorption and catalytic oxidation and flaring are more expensive for similar
control efficiencies, and will prove to be even less cost effective. Thermal oxidation has
control efficiencies that are around 99%. Such air pollution control devices’ costs are
significantly higher and are usually not cost effective at emission levels of the magnitude
exhausting from the storage tanks. Igniting a thermal oxidizer or flare for 174.8 hours
per year will make the cost even less economically feasible.

Appendix A: UDAQ NOI Forms

Form 1
Notice of Intent (NOI) Application Checklist
Company __________________
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section
Source Identification Information [R307-401-5]
1. Company name, mailing address, physical address and telephone number †
2. Company contact (Name, mailing address, and telephone number)†
3. Name and contact of person submitting NOI application (if different than 2)†
4. Source Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates †
5. Source Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code †
6. Area designation (attainment, maintenance, or nonattainment)†
7. Federal/State requirement applicability (NAAQS, NSPS, MACT, SIP, etc.)†
8. Source size determination (Major, Minor, PSD)†
9. Current Approval Order(s) and/or Title V Permit numbers †
NOI Application Information:[R307-401]
†
†
†
†
†
†
†
†
†
†
N/A †
†N/A †
A. Air quality analysis (air model, met data, background data, source impact analysis) †N/A †
Detailed description of the project and source process
Discussion of fuels, raw materials, and products consumed/produced
Description of equipment used in the process and operating schedule
Description of changes to the process, production rates, etc.
Site plan of source with building dimensions, stack parameters, etc.
Best Available Control Technology (BACT) Analysis [R307-401-8]
$BACT analysis for all new and modified equipment
Emissions Related Information: [R307-401-2(b)]
$Emission calculations for each new/modified unit and site-wide
(Include PM10, PM2.5,NOx, SO2, CO, VOCs, HAPs, and GHGs)
%References/assumptions, SDS, for each calculation and pollutant
&All speciated HAP emissions (list in lbs/hr)
Emissions Impact Analysis – Approved Modeling Protocol [R307-410]
$Composition and physical characteristics of effluent
(emission rates, temperature, volume, pollutant types and concentrations)
Nonattainment/Maintenance Areas – Major NSR/Minor (offsetting only) [R307-403]
$NAAQS demonstration, Lowest Achievable Emission Rate, Offset requirements
%Alternative site analysis, Major source ownership compliance certification
Major Sources in Attainment or Unclassified Areas (PSD) [R307-405, R307-406]
%Visibility impact analysis, Class I area impact
 6LJQDWXUHRQ$SSOLFDWLRQ
†N/A †
Note: The Division of Air Quality will not accept documents containing confidential information or data.
Documents containing confidential information will be returned to the Source submitting the application.
Henkel Corporation
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
†
✔

Date Oct 2022____________
REVISION 2 TO INITAL NOI
Page 1 of 1
Form 4 Company____________________________
Project Information Site ______________________________
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section
Process Data - For Modification/Amendment ONLY
1. Permit Number_______________________________
If submitting a new permit, then use Form 3
Requested Changes
2. Name of process to be modified/added:
_______________________________
End product of this process:
_______________________________
3. Permit Change Type: New Increase*
Equipment
Process
Other ______________________________
Other ______________________________
4. Does new emission unit affect existing
permitted process limits?
Yes No
6. Description of Permit/Process Change**
7. New or modified materials and quantities used in process. **
Material Quantity Annually
8. New or modified process emitting units **
Emitting Unit(s)Capacity(s)Manufacture Date(s)
*If the permit being modified does not include CO2e or PM2.5, the emissions need to be calculated and submitted to DAQ, which may result in an
emissions increase and a public comment period.
**If additional space is required, please generate a document to accommodate and attach to form.
Henkel Corporation
Salt Lake City
AN-104630029-19
Soap Manufacturing
Detergents, soaps, and fabric softeners
✔
✔
Condition Change Section II: Permitted____________________Equipment
Other Add/remove filters; Add_____________________________4 new _storage tanks
Add 2 new stacks; Remove obsolete sources
Realign permit limits; Description corrections
✔
5.Condition(s) Changing:
1) Correction of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Limit 2) Adding/removing baghouses and scrubbers 3) Adding/
removing natural gas combustion units 4) Addition of pre-mixers and dry materials to process lines 5) Addition
of 4 new storage tanks and 2 repurposed tanks 6) Removal or R&D Lab 7) Removal of carton printing 8)
Correct description of heat transfer labelers 9) Removal of 33 HP and 255 HP Natural Gas Engines 10) Addition
of 16 HP Natural Gas Engine 11) Correction of horsepower on Diesel Engine from 79 HP to 74 HP
See Narrative and Appendices
See Narrative and Appendicies
See Appendix C
Add 1 new NG engine; Update boiler/AHUs
Page 1 of 1
Company___________________________
Site _____________________________
Form 5
Emissions Information
Criteria/GHGs/ HAP’s
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section
Potential to Emit* Criteria Pollutants & GHGs
Criteria Pollutants Permitted Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emissions Increases
(tons/yr)
Proposed Emissions
(tons/yr)
PM10 Total
PM10 Fugitive
PM2.5
NOx
SO2
CO
VOC
VOC Fugitive
NH3
Greenhouse Gases CO2e CO2e CO2e
CO2
CH4
N2O
HFCs
PFCs
SF6
Total CO2e
*Potential to emit to include pollution control equipment as defined by R307-401-2.
Hazardous Air Pollutants** (**Defined in Section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act )
Hazardous Air
Pollutant***
Permitted Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emission Increase
(tons/yr)
Proposed
Emission (tons/yr)
Emission Increase
(lbs/hr)
Total HAP
*** Use additional sheets for pollutants if needed
SEE CR
I
T
E
R
I
A

P
O
L
L
U
T
A
N
T
MMARY
O
N

P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S

P
SU
AGE
Page 1 of 1
Company___________________________
6LWH_____________________________
Form 
Emissions Information
Criteria/GHGs/ HAP’s
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section
Potential to Emit* Criteria Pollutants & GHGs
Criteria Pollutants Permitted Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emissions Increases
(tons/yr)
Proposed Emissions
(tons/yr)
PM10 Total
PM10 Fugitive
PM2.5
NOx
SO2
CO
VOC
VOC Fugitive
NH3
Greenhouse Gases CO2e CO2e CO2e
CO2
CH4
N2O
HFCs
PFCs
SF6
Total CO2e
*Potential to emit to include pollution control equipment as defined by R307-401-2.
Hazardous Air Pollutants**(**Defined in Section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act )
Hazardous Air
Pollutant***
Permitted Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emission Increase
(tons/yr)
Proposed
Emission (tons/yr)
Emission Increase
(lbs/hr)
Total HAP
*** Use additional sheets for pollutants if needed
Henkel Corporation
Salt Lake City
Methanol 0.32 0.00 0.32 0.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Methjyl Isobutyl Ketone 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Tricholorehtylene 3.90 -3.90 0.00 -0.89
Tetrachloroethylene 1.32 -1.32 0.00 -0.30
S ee Criteria

P
o
l
l
u
t
a
n
t

S
u
m
m
a
r
y

o
n

F
i
r
s
t

P
a
g
e
Docuinonl Ddlo: 02/28/2018
DAQ-2018-00226 ~7\
Page 1 of 2
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section Company Henkel Corporation
Site/Source Salt Lake City
Form 10 Date October 2022
Fabric Filters (Baghouses)

Baghouse Description
1. Briefly describe the process controlled by this baghouse:
BH ID: LQD-5 (Equipment Number LQPRDC005)
Gas Stream Characteristics
2. Flow Rate (acfm): 3. Water Vapor Content of Effluent
Stream (lb. water/lb. dry air)

0.5% est.
4. Particulate Loading (grain/scf)
Design Max
4,300 est.
Average
Expected
Unknown
Inlet
Unknown
Outlet
0.02
5. Pressure Drop (inches H2O)
High 6 Low 1
6. Gas Stream Temperature (°F):
70 est.
7. Fan Requirements (hp) (ft3/min)
Not Determined
Equipment Information and Filter Characteristics
8. Manufacturer and Model Number: MIKRO-PULSAIRE 64S-10-20 C
9. Bag Material:
□ Nomex nylon
□ Polyester
□ Acrylics
□ Fiber glass
□ Cotton
□ Teflon
X N/A 0.02 gr/dscf
10. Bag Diameter
(in.)
4.5
11. Bag Length (ft.)

10
12. Number of Bags:
64
13. Stack Height
69 feet
Stack Inside Diameter
9 x 11 inches
14. Filtering
Efficiency
Rating:

Unknown %
15. Air to Cloth
Ratio:

6 est : 1
16. Hours of Operation:
Max Per day 24
Max Per year 8760
17. Cleaning Mechanism:
□ Reverse Air □ Shaker
X Pulse Jet □ Other:
Emissions Calculations (PTE)
18. Calculated emissions for this device
PM10 0.74 Lbs/hr 3.23 Tons/yr PM2.5 0.74 Lbs/hr 3.23 Tons/yr
NOx NA Lbs/hr NA Tons/yr SOx NA Lbs/hr NA Tons/yr
CO NA Lbs/hr NA Tons/yr VOC NA Lbs/hr NA Tons/yr
HAPs NA Lbs/hr (speciate) NA Tons/yr (speciate)
Submit calculations as an appendix.
Page 2 of 2
Instructions - Form 10 Fabric Filters (Baghouses)

NOTE: 1. Submit this form in conjunction with Form 1 and Form 2.

2. Call the Division of Air Quality (DAQ) at [phone] if you have problems or questions in
filling out this form. Ask to speak with a New Source Review engineer. We will be glad to
help!

1. Describe the process equipment that the filter controls, what product is being controlled, particle size
data (if available), i.e., cement silo, grain silo, nuisance dust in work place, process control with high
dust potential, etc.
2. The maximum and design exhaust gas flow rates through the filter control device in actual cubic feet
per minute (ACFM). Check literature or call the sales agent.
3. The water/moisture content of the gas stream going through the filter.
4. The amount of particulate in the gas stream going into the filter and the amount coming out if available.
Outlet default value = 0.016 grains PM10/dscf.
5. The pressure drop range across the system. Usually given in the literature in inches of water.
6. The temperature of the gas stream entering the filter system in degrees Fahrenheit.
7. The horse power of the fan used to move the gas stream and/or the flow rate of the fan in ft3/min.
8. Name of the manufacturer of the filter equipment and the model number if available.
9. Check the type of filter bag material or fill in the blank. Check literature or call the sales agent.
10. The diameter of the bags in the system. Check literature or call the sales agent.
11. The length of the bags in the system. Check literature or call the sales agent.
12. The number of bags. Check literature or call the sales agent.
13. The height to the top of the stack from ground level and the stack inside diameter.
14. The filtering efficiency rating that the manufacturer quotes. Check literature or call the sales agent.
15. The ratio of the flow rate of air to the cloth area (A/C).
16. The number of hours that the process equipment is in operation, maximum per day and per year.
17. The way in which the filters bags are cleaned. Check the appropriate box.
18. Supply calculations for all criteria pollutants and HAPs. Use AP42 or Manufacturers data to complete
your calculations.

U:\aq\ENGINEER\GENERIC\Forms 2010\Form10 Baghouses.doc
Revised 12/20/10
Page 1 of 2
Utah Division of Air Quality
New Source Review Section Company Henkel Corporation
Site/Source Salt Lake City
Form 10 Date October 2022
Fabric Filters (Baghouses)

Baghouse Description
1. Briefly describe the process controlled by this baghouse:
BH ID: LSL-1 (Equipment Number PWDDC001)
Gas Stream Characteristics
2. Flow Rate (acfm): 3. Water Vapor Content of Effluent
Stream (lb. water/lb. dry air)

0.5% est.
4. Particulate Loading (grain/scf)
Design Max
11,289 est.
Average
Expected
Unknown
Inlet
Unknown
Outlet
0.02
5. Pressure Drop (inches H2O)
High 6 Low 1
6. Gas Stream Temperature (°F):
70 est.
7. Fan Requirements (hp) (ft3/min)
Not Determined
Equipment Information and Filter Characteristics
8. Manufacturer and Model Number: MIKRO-PULSAIRE M168S1020C
9. Bag Material:
□ Nomex nylon
□ Polyester
□ Acrylics
□ Fiber glass
□ Cotton
□ Teflon
X N/A 0.02 gr/dscf
10. Bag Diameter
(in.)
4.5

11. Bag Length (ft.)

10
12. Number of Bags:

168
13. Stack Height
56 feet
Stack Inside Diameter
24 inches
14. Filtering
Efficiency
Rating:

Unknown %
15. Air to Cloth
Ratio:

6 est : 1
16. Hours of Operation:
Max Per day 24
Max Per year 8760
17. Cleaning Mechanism:
□ Reverse Air □ Shaker
X Pulse Jet □ Other:
Emissions Calculations (PTE)
18. Calculated emissions for this device
PM10 1.94 Lbs/hr 8.48 Tons/yr PM2.5 1.94 Lbs/hr 8.48 Tons/yr
NOx NA Lbs/hr NA Tons/yr SOx NA Lbs/hr NA Tons/yr
CO NA Lbs/hr NA Tons/yr VOC NA Lbs/hr NA Tons/yr
HAPs NA Lbs/hr (speciate) NA Tons/yr (speciate)
Submit calculations as an appendix.
Page 2 of 2
Instructions - Form 10 Fabric Filters (Baghouses)

NOTE: 1. Submit this form in conjunction with Form 1 and Form 2.

2. Call the Division of Air Quality (DAQ) at [phone] if you have problems or questions in
filling out this form. Ask to speak with a New Source Review engineer. We will be glad to
help!

1. Describe the process equipment that the filter controls, what product is being controlled, particle size
data (if available), i.e., cement silo, grain silo, nuisance dust in work place, process control with high
dust potential, etc.
2. The maximum and design exhaust gas flow rates through the filter control device in actual cubic feet
per minute (ACFM). Check literature or call the sales agent.
3. The water/moisture content of the gas stream going through the filter.
4. The amount of particulate in the gas stream going into the filter and the amount coming out if available.
Outlet default value = 0.016 grains PM10/dscf.
5. The pressure drop range across the system. Usually given in the literature in inches of water.
6. The temperature of the gas stream entering the filter system in degrees Fahrenheit.
7. The horse power of the fan used to move the gas stream and/or the flow rate of the fan in ft3/min.
8. Name of the manufacturer of the filter equipment and the model number if available.
9. Check the type of filter bag material or fill in the blank. Check literature or call the sales agent.
10. The diameter of the bags in the system. Check literature or call the sales agent.
11. The length of the bags in the system. Check literature or call the sales agent.
12. The number of bags. Check literature or call the sales agent.
13. The height to the top of the stack from ground level and the stack inside diameter.
14. The filtering efficiency rating that the manufacturer quotes. Check literature or call the sales agent.
15. The ratio of the flow rate of air to the cloth area (A/C).
16. The number of hours that the process equipment is in operation, maximum per day and per year.
17. The way in which the filters bags are cleaned. Check the appropriate box.
18. Supply calculations for all criteria pollutants and HAPs. Use AP42 or Manufacturers data to complete
your calculations.

U:\aq\ENGINEER\GENERIC\Forms 2010\Form10 Baghouses.doc
Revised 12/20/10

Appendix B: Site Map

Henkel Corporation Outdoor Storage Tanks
Salt Lake City, UT
TANK 60
Ethanol
TANK 52
Citric
Acid
TANK 66
PEG 400
TANK 23
L24-9
29,000 gal Capacity Storage Tanks
TANK 49
Stepanol
TANK
65A
SLES 70%
TANK 63
Armosoft
DEQ
TANK 22
COCO
Fatty Acid
TANK 27
7EO Non-
Ionic
TANK 1
Sulfonic
Acid
TANK 2
Sodium
Silicate
TANK
63A
Armosoft
DEQ
TANK 65
SLES 70%
Storage Tank 2 Capacity is 32,700 gal; the rest are 34,000 gal
TANK 21
Natural
7EO Non-
ionic
TANK 45
Steol CS-
270
21,000 gal Capacity Storage Tanks

Appendix C: Potential to Emit Calculations

Appendix C Emissions Summary
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
Criteria Pollutants
Point Source ------91 0.05
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --5.8 0.003 2,411 1.21 --
Total --5.8 0.003 2,411 1.21 91 0.05
Point Source ------91 0.05
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --5.8 0.003 2,411 1.21 --
Total --5.8 0.003 2,411 1.21 91 0.05
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --371 0.19 31,730 15.86 --
Total --371 0.19 31,730 15.86 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --76 0.04 190 0.10 --
Total --76 0.04 190 0.10 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --292 0.15 26,653 13.33 --
Total --292 0.15 26,653 13.33 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --107 0.05 1,745 0.87 --
Total --107 0.05 1,745 0.87 --
Greenhouse Gases
CO2 mass --44656 22 38,088,223 19,044 --
GWP-1 CO2e --44656 22 38,088,223 19,044 --
Methane mass --1.76 0.001 718 0.4 --
GWP=25 CO2e --44 0.02 17,946 10.0 --
N2O mass --0.35 0.0002 72 0.04 --
GWP=298 CO2e --103 0.05 21,391 11.92 --
VOC
PM10
PM2.5
NOx
SO2
CO
Printing - Labels Natural Gas Cooling TowersEmergency Engines
Appendix C Emissions Summary
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
Printing - Labels Natural Gas Cooling TowersEmergency Engines
Hazardous Air Pollutants
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --10.61 0.00531 598.80 0.29940 --
Total --10.61 0.00531 598.80 0.29940 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --6.74 0.00337 23.80 0.012 --
Total --6.74 0.00337 23.80 0.012 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.93 0.00047 ----
Total --0.93 0.00047 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --1.10 0.00055 ----
Total --1.10 0.00055 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --------
Total --------
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --------
Total --------
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --------
Total --------
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.058 0.00003 0.16 0.00008 --
Total --0.058 0.00003 0.16 0.00008 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.47 0.00023 0.67 0.00033 --
Total --0.468 0.00023 0.67 0.00033 --
Acrolein
Acetaldehyde
Propionaldehyde
Dimethyl Formamide
All HAP
Formaldehyde
Glycol Ether
Lead
Benzene
Appendix C Emissions Summary
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
Printing - Labels Natural Gas Cooling TowersEmergency Engines
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust ----0.38 0.00019 --
Total ----0.38 0.00019 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.05 0.00003 571 0.28557 --
Total --0.05 0.00003 571 0.28557 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.22 0.00011 1.08 0.00054 --
Total --0.22 0.00011 1.08 0.00054 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.03 0.00002 0.19 0.00010 --
Total --0.03 0.00002 0.19 0.00010 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.05 0.00002 0.03 0.00001 --
Total --0.05 0.00002 0.03 0.00001 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust ----0.06 0.00003 --
Total ----0.06 0.00003 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust ----0.00 0.000002 --
Total ----0.00 0.000002 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust ----0.35 0.00017 --
Total ----0.35 0.00017 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust ----0.04 0.00002 --
Total ----0.04 0.00002 --
Hexane
Toluene
Dichlorobenzene
Polycyclic Organics
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Beryllium
Naphthalene
Appendix C Emissions Summary
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
Printing - Labels Natural Gas Cooling TowersEmergency Engines
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust ----0.03 0.00001 --
Total ----0.03 0.00001 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust ----0.12 0.00006 --
Total ----0.12 0.00006 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust ----0.08 0.00004 --
Total ----0.08 0.00004 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust ----0.67 0.00033 --
Total ----0.67 0.00033 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust ----0.008 0.000004 --
Total ----0.008 0.000004 --
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.11 0.00005 ----
Total --0.11 0.00005 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.11 0.00005 ----
Total --0.11 0.00005 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.0077 0.00000 ----
Total --0.0077 0.00000 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.0061 0.00000 ----
Total --0.0061 0.00000 ----
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Cobalt
Manganese
Xylene
1,3-Butadiene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Appendix C Emissions Summary
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
Printing - Labels Natural Gas Cooling TowersEmergency Engines
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.0051 0.00000 ----
Total --0.0051 0.00000 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.0986 0.00005 ----
Total --0.0986 0.00005 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.0071 0.000004 ----
Total --0.0071 0.000004 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.0052 0.000003 ----
Total --0.0052 0.000003 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.0055 0.000003 ----
Total --0.0055 0.000003 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.0126 0.00001 ----
Total --0.0126 0.00001 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.0086 0.000004 ----
Total --0.0086 0.000004 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.29 0.00014 ----
Total --0.29 0.00014 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.0112 0.00001 ----
Total --0.0112 0.00001 ----
1,3-Dichloropropene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Ethylene Dibromide
Methylene Chloride
Phenol
Appendix C Emissions Summary
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
Printing - Labels Natural Gas Cooling TowersEmergency Engines
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.0064 0.000003 ----
Total --0.0064 0.000003 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.0029 0.000001 ----
Total --0.0029 0.000001 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --0.29 0.00014 ----
Total --0.29 0.00014 ----
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --------
Total --------
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --------
Total --------
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --------
Total --------
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust --------
Total --------
Other Pollutants
Point Source --------
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust ----1708 0.85 --
Total ----1,708 0.85 --
* Previously reported and is unchanged from Approval Order AN104630023-17.
Ammonia
Methanol
Ethylene Glycol
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Trichloro Ethylene
Tetrachloro Ethylene
Styrene
Vinyl Chloride
Appendix C Emissions Summary
Criteria Pollutants
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Greenhouse Gases
CO2 mass
GWP-1 CO2e
Methane mass
GWP=25 CO2e
N2O mass
GWP=298 CO2e
VOC
PM10
PM2.5
NOx
SO2
CO
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
------53,469 26.73 7.83 0.004
--288.58 0.14 1,954 0.98 ----
--288.58 0.14 1,954 0.98 53,469 26.73 7.83 0.004
------53,469 26.73 --
--43.70 0.02 1,954 0.98 ----
--43.70 0.02 1,954 0.98 53,469 26.73 --
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
--------188 0.09
1,980 0.99 9,049 4.52 4,104 2.05 ----
1,980 0.99 9,049 4.52 4,104 2.05 --188 0.09
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
Blow Molding *Organic Liquid
Storage Liquid Products Paint BoothDust Control
Equipment
Appendix C Emissions Summary
Hazardous Air Pollutants
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Acrolein
Acetaldehyde
Propionaldehyde
Dimethyl Formamide
All HAP
Formaldehyde
Glycol Ether
Lead
Benzene
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
Blow Molding *Organic Liquid
Storage Liquid Products Paint BoothDust Control
Equipment
--------23 0.011
--1.22 0.00061 8.64 0.00430 ----
--1.22 0.00061 8.64 0.00430 --23 0.011
----------
----5.18 0.0026 ----
----5.18 0.0026 ----
----------
----------
----------
----------
----3.46 0.0017 ----
----3.46 0.0017 ----
----------
----------
----------
----------
--1.2203 0.0006 ------
--1.2203 0.0006 ------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
Appendix C Emissions Summary
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Hexane
Toluene
Dichlorobenzene
Polycyclic Organics
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Beryllium
Naphthalene
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
Blow Molding *Organic Liquid
Storage Liquid Products Paint BoothDust Control
Equipment
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
Appendix C Emissions Summary
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Cobalt
Manganese
Xylene
1,3-Butadiene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
Blow Molding *Organic Liquid
Storage Liquid Products Paint BoothDust Control
Equipment
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
--------9.79 0.0049
----------
--------9.79 0.0049
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
Appendix C Emissions Summary
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
1,3-Dichloropropene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Ethylene Dibromide
Methylene Chloride
Phenol
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
Blow Molding *Organic Liquid
Storage Liquid Products Paint BoothDust Control
Equipment
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
--------3.26 0.0016
----------
--------3.26 0.0016
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
Appendix C Emissions Summary
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Other Pollutants
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
* Previously reported and is unchanged from Approval Order AN10
Ammonia
Methanol
Ethylene Glycol
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Trichloro Ethylene
Tetrachloro Ethylene
Styrene
Vinyl Chloride
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
Blow Molding *Organic Liquid
Storage Liquid Products Paint BoothDust Control
Equipment
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
--------9.79 0.0049
----------
--------9.79 0.0049
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
--------
--------
--------
Appendix C Emissions Summary
Criteria Pollutants
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Greenhouse Gases
CO2 mass
GWP-1 CO2e
Methane mass
GWP=25 CO2e
N2O mass
GWP=298 CO2e
VOC
PM10
PM2.5
NOx
SO2
CO
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
----53,568 26.78
6.99E-02 3.49E-05 --4,660 2.33
6.99E-02 3.49E-05 --58,228 29.12
----53,560 26.78
0 0 --4,415 2.21
6.99E-02 3.49E-05 --57,975 28.99
----0 0.00
----32,101 16.05
----32,101 16.05
----0 0.00
----266 0.13
----266 0.13
----0 0.00
----26,945 13.47
----26,945 13.47
----188 0.09
--2,656 1.33 19,642 9.82
--2,656 1.33 19,830 9.91
----38,132,879 19,066
----38,132,879 19,066
----720 0.40
----17,990 10
----72 0.04
----21,495 12
TotalRailcar Unloading Miscellaneous
Appendix C Emissions Summary
Hazardous Air Pollutants
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Acrolein
Acetaldehyde
Propionaldehyde
Dimethyl Formamide
All HAP
Formaldehyde
Glycol Ether
Lead
Benzene
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
TotalRailcar Unloading Miscellaneous
----22.84 0.0114
--819.68 0.40984 1438.96 0.72
--819.68 0.40984 1,461.80 0.731
------
----35.71 0.02
----35.71 0.018
------
----0.93 0.0005
----0.93 0.0005
------
----4.56 0.002
----4.56 0.002
------
------
----0.00 0.00
------
----1.22 0.0006
----1.22 0.0006
------
--186.08 0.093 186.08 0.093
--186.08 0.093 186.08 0.093
------
----0.22 0.0001
----0.22 0.0001
------
----1.13 0.0006
----1.13 0.0006
Appendix C Emissions Summary
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Hexane
Toluene
Dichlorobenzene
Polycyclic Organics
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Beryllium
Naphthalene
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
TotalRailcar Unloading Miscellaneous
------
----0.38 0.0002
----0.38 0.0002
------
----571.19 0.29
----571.19 0.286
------
----1.30 0.0006
----1.30 0.0006
------
----0.23 0.0001
----0.23 0.0001
------
----0.08 0.00004
----0.08 0.00004
------
----0.06 0.00003
----0.06 0.00003
------
----0.004 0.000002
----0.004 0.000002
------
----0.35 0.0002
----0.35 0.0002
------
----0.04 0.00002
----0.04 0.00002
Appendix C Emissions Summary
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Cobalt
Manganese
Xylene
1,3-Butadiene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
TotalRailcar Unloading Miscellaneous
------
----0.03 0.00001
----0.03 0.00001
------
----0.12 0.0001
----0.12 0.0001
------
----0.08 0.00004
----0.08 0.00004
------
----0.67 0.0003
----0.67 0.0003
------
----0.008 0.000004
----0.008 0.000004
----9.79 0.0049
----0.11 0.00
----9.89 0.005
------
----0.11 0.0001
----0.11 0.0001
------
----0.008 0.000004
----0.008 0.000004
------
----0.006 0.000003
----0.006 0.000003
Appendix C Emissions Summary
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
1,3-Dichloropropene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
Ethylene Dibromide
Methylene Chloride
Phenol
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
TotalRailcar Unloading Miscellaneous
------
----0.005 0.000003
----0.005 0.000003
------
----0.10 0.00005
----0.10 0.00005
------
----0.007 0.000004
----0.007 0.000004
------
----0.005 0.000003
----0.005 0.000003
------
----0.005 0.000003
----0.005 0.000003
----3.26 0.0016
----0.01 0.00
----3.28 0.0016
------
----0.009 0.000004
----0.009 0.000004
------
----0.29 0.0001
----0.29 0.0001
------
----0.011 0.00001
----0.011 0.00001
Appendix C Emissions Summary
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
Other Pollutants
Point Source
Fugitive or Vertically
Restricted Exhaust
Total
* Previously reported and is unchanged from Approval Order AN10
Ammonia
Methanol
Ethylene Glycol
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Trichloro Ethylene
Tetrachloro Ethylene
Styrene
Vinyl Chloride
lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr lbs/yr tons/yr
TotalRailcar Unloading Miscellaneous
------
----0.006 0.000003
----0.006 0.000003
------
----0.0029 0.000001
----0.0029 0.000001
------
--633.60 0.3168 633.9 0.317
--633.60 0.3168 633.9 0.317
------
------
----0.00 0.00
----9.79 0.0049
------
----9.79 0.0049
----
------
----0.00 0.00
------
------
-----0.00
----
--1707.8 0.85
--1707.8 0.85
Appendix C - (2) Emergency Engines
74 HP Diesel & 16 HP Natural Gas Emergency Engine
Fuel Type:Diesel
Manufactured Date:10/18/2004
Manufacturer:John Deere
Model number:3029HI530
Tier/Phase [1]:Final Stage 4/ Stage V Engine
Rated Power [1]: 74 HP
55 kW
7,000 Btu/hp-hr
Hours of Operation:500 hr/yr
Potential to Emit
Pollutant Reference Emissions
(lb/yr)
Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emissions
(lb/hr)
NMHC + NOX 3.10E-02 g/kWh Manufacturer [1]1.9 0.001 3.76E-03
CO 6.68E-03 lb/hp-hr AP-42, Table 3.3-1 247.2 0.12 0.49
SOX 2.05E-03 lb/hp-hr AP-42, Table 3.3-1 75.9 0.04 0.15
PM 2.20E-03 g/kWh Manufacturer [1]0.1 0.0001 2.67E-04
CO2 1.15E+00 lb/hp-hr AP-42, Table 3.3-1 42,550.0 21.28 85.10
VOC 2.51E-03 lb/hp-hr AP-42, Table 3.3-1 93.0 0.05 0.19
Average Brake-Specific fuel Consumption [2]:
Emission Factor
Appendix C - (2) Emergency Engines
74 HP Diesel & 16 HP Natural Gas Emergency Engine
Pollutant Emission Factor
(lb/MMBtu)Reference Emissions
(lb/yr)
Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emissions
(lb/hr)
Benzene 9.33E-04 AP-42, Table 3.3-2 0.24 1.21E-04 4.83E-04
Toluene 4.09E-04 AP-42, Table 3.3-2 0.11 5.30E-05 2.12E-04
Xylene 2.85E-04 AP-42, Table 3.3-2 0.07 3.69E-05 1.48E-04
1,3-Butadiene 3.91E-05 AP-42, Table 3.3-2 0.01 5.06E-06 2.03E-05
Formaldehyde 1.18E-03 AP-42, Table 3.3-2 0.31 1.53E-04 6.11E-04
Acetaldehyde 7.67E-04 AP-42, Table 3.3-2 0.20 9.93E-05 3.97E-04
Acrolein 9.25E-05 AP-42, Table 3.3-2 0.02 1.20E-05 4.79E-05
Naphthalene 8.48E-05 AP-42, Table 3.3-2 0.02 1.10E-05 4.39E-05
POM-HAP [3]1.68E-04 AP-42, Table 3.3-2 0.04 2.18E-05 8.70E-05
1.03 5.13E-04 2.05E-03
Greenhouse Gases Potential to Emit
Gas Emission Factor (EF)
(kg/MMBtu)
Global Warming
Potential (GWP)Reference Emissions (lb/yr)Emissions (ton/yr)Greenhouse Gas
(ton CO2e/yr)
CO2 73.96 1
EF: Table C-1 of 40 CFR 98
Subpart C
GWP: Table A-1 of 40 CFR
98 Subpart A
42,238 21 21
CH4 3.00E-03 25
EF: Table C-2 of 40 CFR 98
Subpart C
GWP: Table A-1 of 40 CFR
98 Subpart A
2 8.57E-04 0.02
N2O 6.00E-04 298
EF: Table C-2 of 40 CFR 98
Subpart C
GWP: Table A-1 of 40 CFR
98 Subpart A
0.34 1.71E-04 0.05
21.19
Notes:
GHG (ton CO2e/yr)
[1]: Information from manufacturer at: https://www.deere.com/en/industrial-engines/final-tier-4-stage-v/3029hi530/
[2]: Factor from AP-42, Chapter 3.3, Gasoline and Industrial Engines
Total HAP
[3] Emission factor for polycyclic organic matter (POM) is calculated by summing emission factors for individual constituents listed in AP-42, Table 3.3-2.
Appendix C - (2) Emergency Engines
74 HP Diesel & 16 HP Natural Gas Emergency Engine
Fuel Type:Natural Gas (converted from gasoline by use of a kit supplied by the manufacturer)
Manufactured Date:1969
Manufacturer:Briggs and Stratton
Model number:303775
Stroke: 2-Stroke Lean Burn
Rated Power: 16 HP
Rated Heat Output Capacity:0.04072 MMBtu/hr (output)
Engine Thermal Efficiency [1]:17.5%(Assumed)
Estimated Heat Input Capacity:0.233 MMBtu/hr (input)
1,020 Btu/scf
Maximum Gas Usage 0.114 (No Suggestions)/yr
Hours of Operation:500 hr/yr
Potential to Emit
Pollutant Reference Emissions
(lb/yr)
Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emissions
(lb/hr)
NOX 3.17E+00 lb/MMBtu AP-42, Table 3.2-1 369.3 1.85E-01 7.39E-01
CO 3.86E-01 lb/MMBtu AP-42, Table 3.2-1 45.0 2.25E-02 8.99E-02
Lead 5.00E-04 lb/MMBtu AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.1 2.91E-05 1.17E-04
PM10 (Fil + Cond)4.83E-02 lb/MMBtu AP-42, Table 3.2-1 5.6 2.81E-03 1.13E-02
PM2.5 (Fil + Cond)4.83E-02 lb/MMBtu AP-42, Table 3.2-1 5.6 2.81E-03 1.13E-02
SO2 5.88E-04 lb/MMBtu AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.1 3.43E-05 1.37E-04
VOC 1.20E-01 lb/MMBtu AP-42, Table 3.2-1 14.0 6.99E-03 2.80E-02
Natural Gas Heating Value [2]:
Emission Factor
Appendix C - (2) Emergency Engines
74 HP Diesel & 16 HP Natural Gas Emergency Engine
Pollutant Emission Factor
(lb/MMBtu)Reference Emissions
(lb/yr)
Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emissions
(lb/hr)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 6.63E-05 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.01 3.86E-06 1.54E-05
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.27E-05 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.01 3.07E-06 1.23E-05
1,3-Butadiene 8.20E-04 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.10 4.78E-05 1.91E-04
1,3-Dichloropropene 4.38E-05 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.01 2.55E-06 1.02E-05
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 8.46E-04 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.10 4.93E-05 1.97E-04
Acetaldehyde 7.76E-03 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.90 4.52E-04 1.81E-03
Acrolein 7.78E-03 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.91 4.53E-04 1.81E-03
Benzene 1.94E-03 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.23 1.13E-04 4.52E-04
Carbon Tetrachloride 6.07E-05 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.01 3.54E-06 1.41E-05
Chlorobenzene 4.44E-05 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.01 2.59E-06 1.03E-05
Chloroform 4.71E-05 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.01 2.74E-06 1.10E-05
Ethylbenzene 1.08E-04 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.01 6.29E-06 2.52E-05
Ethylene Dibromide 7.34E-05 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.01 4.28E-06 1.71E-05
Formaldehyde 5.52E-02 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 6.43 3.22E-03 1.29E-02
Methanol 2.48E-03 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.29 1.44E-04 5.78E-04
Methylene Chloride 2.48E-03 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.29 1.44E-04 5.78E-04
n-Hexane 4.45E-04 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.05 2.59E-05 1.04E-04
Naphthalene 9.63E-05 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.01 5.61E-06 2.24E-05
Phenol 9.63E-05 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.01 5.61E-06 2.24E-05
Styrene 5.48E-05 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.01 3.19E-06 1.28E-05
Toluene 9.63E-04 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.11 5.61E-05 2.24E-04
Vinyl Chloride 2.47E-05 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.00 1.44E-06 5.76E-06
Xylene 2.68E-04 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.03 1.56E-05 6.24E-05
POM-HAP [3]3.04E-05 AP-42, Table 3.2-1 0.00 1.77E-06 7.07E-06
9.53 4.76E-03 1.91E-02Total HAP
Appendix C - (2) Emergency Engines
74 HP Diesel & 16 HP Natural Gas Emergency Engine
Greenhouse Gases Potential to Emit
Gas Emission Factor (EF)
(kg/MMBtu)
Global Warming
Potential (GWP)Reference Emissions (lb/yr)Emissions (ton/yr)Greenhouse Gas
(ton CO2e/yr)
CO2 53.86 1
EF: Table C-1 of 40 CFR 98
Subpart C
GWP: Table A-1 of 40 CFR
98 Subpart A
2,418 1 1
CH4 1.00E-03 25
EF: Table C-2 of 40 CFR 98
Subpart C
GWP: Table A-1 of 40 CFR
98 Subpart A
0 0 0
N2O 1.00E-04 298
EF: Table C-2 of 40 CFR 98
Subpart C
GWP: Table A-1 of 40 CFR
98 Subpart A
0 0 0
1
Notes:
[1]: Present day natural gas engine efficiency is 35%. This engine efficiency was adjusted for lesser technology resulting in lower efficiencies by 50%.
[2]: Factor from AP-42, Chapter 3.2, Natural Gas-fired Reciprocating Engines
GHG (ton CO2e/yr)
[3] Emission factor for polycyclic organic matter (POM) is calculated by summing emission factors for individual constituents listed in AP-42, Table 3.2-1
Appendix C - Particulate Control Equipment
Dust Collectors, Bin Vents and Wet Scrubbers
Updated Fabric Filter PM PTE [1]
Old - Approved Equipment
Process Name Old - Equipment Number Updated - Process Name Make / Model / Serial Number or Part
Number
Updated -
Equipment Number Order Group Grain Loading
(gr/dscf)
Exhaust Flow
Rate (dscfm)
Particulate
Matter (lb/hr)
Particulate Matter
(ton/yr)
LSL-3 Bin Vent (SA 100)LSL1DUSTCOLLECTOR3 BH - Soda Ash 100 Silo (Tank 3)Unknown PWDDC003 (LSL-3)2 0.02 726 0.12 0.55
LSL-4 Bin Vent (Salt)LSL1DUSTCOLLECTOR4 BH - Salt Bin 1 Unknown PWDDC004 (LSL-4)2 0.007 1500 0.09 0.39
LSL-6 Process Baghouse LSL1DUSTCOLLECTOR6 BH - LS Line 10 Unknown PWDDC006 (LSL-6)2 0.02 2500 0.43 1.88
Soda BV-1 Bin Vent OXYDUSTCOLLECTOR1 BH - Soda Ash for Tank 29 Unknown RMC029 2 0.02 1413 0.24 1.06
LSL-9 Bin Vent (Salt)LSL1DUSTCOLLECTOR8 BH - Salt Bin 2 Unknown PWDDC008 (LSL-9)2 0.02 1000 0.17 0.75
LSL-8 Process GV Unit LSL1DUSTCOLLECTOR7 BH - General Vent for Agglomerator 3
Area Unknown PWDDC007 (LSL-8)3 0.005 9074 0.39 1.70
MESBH-1 MES Transfer
Station Baghouse HSL1DUSTCOLLECTOR16 BH - MES Unloading Station Unknown PWDDC016 (MESBH-
1)4 0.016 3500 0.48 2.10
Appendix C - Particulate Control Equipment
Dust Collectors, Bin Vents and Wet Scrubbers
Updated Fabric Filter PM PTE [1]
Old - Approved Equipment
Process Name Old - Equipment Number Updated - Process Name Make / Model / Serial Number or Part
Number
Updated -
Equipment Number Order Group Grain Loading
(gr/dscf)
Exhaust Flow
Rate (dscfm)
Particulate
Matter (lb/hr)
Particulate Matter
(ton/yr)
MESBV-2 MES Low Suds Bin
Vent HSL1DUSTCOLLECTOR11 BH - Agglomerator 3 MES Bin MICRO-PULSAIR / 23-10-220 / Unknown PWDDC011 (MESBV-
1)4 0.016 1800 0.25 1.08
LQD-5 LQD1DUSTCOLLECTOR3 BH - Mixer 7 Soda Ash MIKRO-PULSAIRE / 64S-10-20 C / 205033 H1 LQPRDC005 N/A 0.02 4300 0.74 3.23
N/A N/A BH - General Vent for Agglomerator 3
Area MIKRO-PULSAIRE / M168S1020C / 880207H2 PWDDC001 (LSL-1)N/A 0.02 11289 1.94 8.48
N/A N/A BH - Sokalan MIKRO-PULSAIRE / M16S1020 / 980176H1GA PWDDC010 N/A [1][1][1][1]
LSS-3/1 Low Suds Scrubber LSL3WETSCRUBBER BH - Agglomerator 3 Unknown PWD3LSLWETSCRU
BBER (LSS-3/1)Scrubber 0.02 6824 1.17 5.12
N/A N/A BH - Single Dose Area Unknown SDLDC001 N/A [1][1][1][1]
N/A N/A BH - Single Dose Area Unknown SDLDC003 N/A [1][1][1][1]
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind
Indoors
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A [1][1][1][1]
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind
Indoors
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A [1][1][1][1]
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind Line
5, No. 1
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A 0.02 40 0.01 0.03
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind Line
5, No. 2
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A 0.02 40 0.01 0.03
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind Line
3, No. 1
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A 0.02 40 0.01 0.03
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind Line
3, No. 2
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A 0.02 40 0.01 0.03
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind Line
3, No. 3
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A 0.02 40 0.01 0.03
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind Line
4, No. 1
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A 0.02 40 0.01 0.03
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind Line
4, No. 2
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A 0.02 40 0.01 0.03
Appendix C - Particulate Control Equipment
Dust Collectors, Bin Vents and Wet Scrubbers
Updated Fabric Filter PM PTE [1]
Old - Approved Equipment
Process Name Old - Equipment Number Updated - Process Name Make / Model / Serial Number or Part
Number
Updated -
Equipment Number Order Group Grain Loading
(gr/dscf)
Exhaust Flow
Rate (dscfm)
Particulate
Matter (lb/hr)
Particulate Matter
(ton/yr)
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind Line
4, No. 3
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A 0.02 40 0.01 0.03
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind
Lines 15 & 17, No. 1
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A 0.02 40 0.01 0.03
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind PCR
#1, No. 1
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A 0.02 40 0.01 0.03
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind PCR
#2, No. 1
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A 0.02 40 0.01 0.03
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind
Lines 14 & 12, No. 1
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A 0.02 40 0.01 0.03
N/A N/A Sock Fabric Filter - Plastic Regrind
Lines 14 & 12, No. 2
National Filter Media Corporation / Part
Number 0502820-196-227-030 N/A N/A 0.02 40 0.01 0.03
Total 6 26.73
Notes
[1]: Baghouses highlighted in green are baghouses that are not currently in the Approval Order DAQE-AN104630027-19 dated April 11, 2019 and are being revised from the initial NOI submitted in July of 2022.
[2]: Baghouses are vented indoors, and are not considered emission points. Information provided for informational purposes only.
Removed Baghouses [1]
Old - Approved Equipment
Process Name Old - Equipment Number pdated - Process Nam
Updated - Equipment
Number
Order
Group Comment
Grain
Loading
(gr/dscf)
Exhaust
Flow
Rate
(dscfm)
LSL-7 Pkg GV Unit LSL4DUSTCOLLECTOR9
General Vent for
Packaging Lines PWDDC009 3
Process
Removed,
baghouse not in
service
0.01 9074
LQD-4 LQD3DUSTCOLLECTOR6 N/A N/A N/A
Process
Removed,
baghouse not in
service
0.01 3468
LQD 7 Dust Collector LQD1DUSTCOLLECTOR7
Soda Ash Transfer
Mixer # 7 LQPRDC007 (LQD-7)2
Process
Removed,
baghouse not in
service
0.02 450
LQD-6 LQD3DUSTCOLLECTOR8 Soda Ash Mixer #7 LQPRDC008 (LQD-6)N/A
Process
Removed,
baghouse not in
service
0.02 80
SAS-1 Soda Ash Scrubber LQPRWET074 Soda Ash Tank 10 LQDPRWET074 Scrubbers Does not run 0.01 3420
Notes
[1]: Information provided is for informational purposes only.
Appendix C- Boilers and Heaters Firing Natural Gas
Permitted Emission Unit
Rated Heat
Input
Capacity
(MMBtu/hr)Boiler or Heater Description Comments
0.48 LSL-1 Permitted in current AO.
2.5 LSL-3 Permitted in current AO.
4.5 LSL-4 Permitted in current AO.
8.37 Sellers 200 HP Steam Boiler (LQD3STEAMBOILER1)Permitted in current AO.
2.51 Sellers 77 COMMODORE 60 HP Boiler (PWD3HSLBOILER)Not included in AO.
7.3 LQD3PV01 This is the pressure vessel used for the 8.37
MMBtu/hr Steam Boiler. This is not a boiler.
2.08 Permitted boiler Permitted in current AO.
2.08 Permitted boiler Permitted in current AO.
14 Permitted boiler Permitted in current AO.
6.3 Parker T6800LR Boiler (LQDBOILER04)Permitted as 6.4 MMBtu/hr in current AO.
0.77 Parker Boiler WH730 (LQD3BOILER01)Not included in AO.
14 Armstrong Flo-Direct Water Heater with Low NOx Burner Permitted in current AO.
Air Handling Unit 1.62 Bessamaire Direct Industrial Air Handling Unit BCY-25TLF Not included in AO.
5 Heat Transfer labelers, each with 4 Burners
and 1 Heat Transfer Labeler with 6 Burners 1.092 Each Burner at a rated heat input capacity of 42,000 BTU/hr Permitted in current AO.
Miscellaneous Boilers 13.05 Miscellaneous Permitted Boilers Permitted in current AO.
Total Rated Heat Input Capacity at the Facility 37.163 MMBtu/hr
Natural Gas High Heat Value 1026 MMBtu/MMcuft natural gas 40 CFR 98 Subpart C, Table 1
Potential Hourly Use of Natural Gas 0.0362 MMcuft natural gas/hr
Potential Annual Use of Natural Gas 317 MMcuft natural gas/yr
Maximum Permitted Fuel Use 533.7 MMcuft natural gas/yr
Potential to Emit Criteria Pollutants
Pollutant
AP-42
Emission
Factor
(lb/MMcuft)
Source of Emission Factor Emissions (lb/yr)Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emissions
(lb/hr)
NOx from Conventional Burner 100 Table 1.4-1 31,730 15.86 3.62
CO 84 Table 1.4-1 26,653 13.33 3.04
PM10 (Primary)7.6 Table 1.4-2 2,411 1.21 0.28
SO2 0.6 Table 1.4-2 190 0.10 0.02
VOC 5.5 Table 1.4-2 1,745 0.87 0.20
Lead 0.0005 Table 1.4-2 0.16 0.000079 0.000018
One Conditioning Drum Heater
Boilers and Water Heaters
Appendix C- Boilers and Heaters Firing Natural Gas
Potential to Emit Hazardous Air Pollutants
Pollutant
AP-42
Emission
Factor
(lb/MMcuft)
Reference Emissions (lb/yr)Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emissions
(lb/hr)
Benzene 2.10E-03 AP-42, table 1.4-3 0.67 0.0003 7.61E-05
Dichlorobenzene 1.20E-03 AP-42, table 1.4-3 0.38 0.0002 4.35E-05
Formaldehyde 7.50E-02 AP-42, table 1.4-3 23.80 0.0119 2.72E-03
Hexane 1.80E+00 AP-42, table 1.4-3 571.14 0.2856 6.52E-02
Toluene 3.40E-03 AP-42, table 1.4-3 1.08 0.0005 1.23E-04
Naphthalene 6.10E-04 AP-42, table 1.4-3 0.19 0.0001 2.21E-05
Polycyclic Organic Matter *8.82E-05 AP-42, table 1.4-3 0.03 0.000014 3.19E-06
Arsenic 2.00E-04 AP-42, table 1.4-4 0.06 0.00003 7.24E-06
Beryllium 1.20E-05 AP-42, table 1.4-4 0.00 0.000002 4.35E-07
Cadmium 1.10E-03 AP-42, table 1.4-4 0.35 0.0002 3.98E-05
Chromium 1.40E-04 AP-42, table 1.4-4 0.04 0.00002 5.07E-06
Cobalt 8.40E-05 AP-42, table 1.4-4 0.03 0.00001 3.04E-06
Manganese 3.80E-04 AP-42, table 1.4-4 0.12 0.0001 1.38E-05
Mercury 2.60E-04 AP-42, table 1.4-4 0.08 0.0000 9.42E-06
Nickel 2.10E-03 AP-42, table 1.4-4 0.67 0.0003 7.61E-05
Selenium 2.40E-05 AP-42, table 1.4-4 0.01 0.000004 8.69E-07
0.299323 0.068339
Greenhouse Gases Potential to Emit
Gas
Emission
Factor (EF)
(kg/MMBtu)
Global Warming Potential (GWP)Reference Emissions
(lb/yr)
Emissions
(ton/yr)
Greenhouse
Gas (ton
CO2e/yr)
CO2 53.06 1 EF: Table C-1 of 40 CFR 98 Subpart C
GWP: Table A-1 of 40 CFR 98 Subpart A 38,088,223 19,044 19,044
CH4 1.00E-03 25 EF: Table C-2 of 40 CFR 98 Subpart C
GWP: Table A-1 of 40 CFR 98 Subpart A 718 0.4 10
N2O 1.00E-04 298 EF: Table C-2 of 40 CFR 98 Subpart C
GWP: Table A-1 of 40 CFR 98 Subpart A 72 0.04 12
19,066
Potential to Emit Miscellaneous Air Pollutants
Pollutant
Emission
Factor
(lb/MMcuft)
Reference Emissions (lb/yr)Emissions
(tons/yr)
Emissions
(lb/hr)
Ammonia 3.2 UDAQ Emission Factor by Process 1708 0.85 0.19
GHG (ton CO2e/yr)
* Emission factor for polycyclic organic matter is calculated by summing emission factors for individual constituents listed in AP-42, table 1.4-3.
Total HAP
Appendix C - Miscellaneous Sources
Source Emissions Accounted for Using Mass Balance Assuming 100% Evaporation
QA Lab
Totals
(lbs)
VideoJet
16-8530Q
Ink
VideoJet
16-8535F
Make-Up
Fluid
VideoJet
Marsh
Ink IJ-P-
BK2-G5
VideoJet
Cleaning
Solution
V901-Q
VideoJet
Cleaning
Solution
V904-Q
VideoJet
410-D Ink
VideoJet
V469-D
Ink
VideoJet
MakeUp
Fluid
V705-D
VideoJet
V710-D
Make-Up
Fluid
Methanol
Container
plastic
bottle carboy carboy plastic
bottle
plastic
bottle cartridge cartridge cartridge cartridge glass bottle
Product/container (gallons)0.375 5 5 0.265 0.265 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 1
Density (lbs/gal)7.26 6.67 8.42 6.67 6.54 7.51 7.22 6.67 6.57 6.6
Calculate VOC content:
% VOC 76%99%8%99%30%44%100%99%40%100%
VOC/container (lbs)2.0691 33.0165 3.368 1.749875 0.51993 0.66088 1.444 1.32066 0.5256 6.6
Containers/year (actual)0 0 17 74 38 22 29 378 474 24
Actual VOC Emissions 0 0 57.26 129.49 19.76 14.54 41.88 499.21 249.13 158.4
Actual-PTE-Factor 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4
Potential VOC (lb/yr)2656.13 0 0 114.51 258.98 39.51 29.08 83.75 998.42 498.27 633.6
HAP: Methanol
% Methanol 100%
Methanol/container (lbs)6.5969
Potential Methanol (lb/yr)633.6 633.6
Emission rate (lb/hr)0.018 0.018082192
HAP: Glycol Ether
% Glycol Ether 13%
Glycol Ether/container (lbs)5.47
Potential Glycol Ether (lb/yr)186.08 186.08
Emission rate (lb/hr)0.011 0.010621
HAP: Ethylene Glycol
% Ethylene Glycol
Ethylene Glycol/container (lbs)
Potential Ethylene Glycol (lb/yr)0
Emission rate (lb/hr)0
HAP: MIBK
% Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (MIBK)
MIBK/container (lbs)1%
Potential MIBK (lb/yr)0 0
Emission rate (lb/hr)0 0
HAP: Trichloroethylene (TCE)
% Trichloroethylene (TCE)
TCE/container (lbs)
Potential TCE (lb/yr)0
Emission rate (lb/hr)0
HAP: Perc
% Tetrachloroethylene (Perc)
Perc/container (lbs)
Potential Perc (lb/yr)0
Emission rate (lb/hr)0
HAP: All HAPs
Potential Total (lb/yr)819.68 --186.08 ------633.60
Potential Total (ton/yr)0.41 --0.093 ------0.317
Total Emission rate (lb/hr)0.09 --0.021 ------0.072
VideoJet Coders - Printing lot and date codes of product containers
Product
Appendix C - Blending and Transferring Liquid Products
Based on Generic Recipe
Raw Material Constituent CASN Fraction in Raw
Material Vapor Pressure (mm Hg 20° F)Molecular
Weight % in Recipe % in Batch Molecular
Abundance
C12-C15 Alcohol Ethoxylate 7EO C12-C15 Alcohol Ethoxylate 6131-39-5 1.00 7.54E-11 406.61 17.50%17.50%0.0430
Glycerin Glycerin 56-81-5 1.00 3.00E-03 92.09 25.00%25.00%0.2715
Ethanol Ethyl Alcohol 64-17-5 1.00 4.46E+01 46.07 0.01%0.01%0.0002
Ethanolamine Ethanolamine 141-43-5 0.99 4.04E-01 61.08 1.80%1.78%0.0291
Water Water 0 1.00 1.75E+01 18.02 20.00%20.00%1.1099
0.25%
Benzenesulfonic Acid, 2,2'-([1,1'-biphenyl]-
4,4'-diyldi-2,1-ethenediyl)bis-disodium salt 27344-41-8 0.90 0.00E+00 562.56 0.23%0.0004
N,N-dimethylformamide 68-12-2 0.15 3.87E+00 73.10 0.04%0.0005
4.50%
Dodecylbenzene Sulfonic Acid 27176-87-0 0.96 7.93E-11 327.51 4.32%0.0132
Sulfuric Acid 7664-93-9 0.02 1.00E-03 98.08 0.09%0.0009
Coconut Oil Fatty Coconut Fatty Acid 61788-47-4 1.00 0.00E+00 200.32 7.50%7.50%0.0374
15.00%
Sodium Laureth Sulfate 68585-34-2 0.60 0.00E+00 362.50 9.00%0.0248
Ethanol 0 0.14 4.46E+01 46.07 2.03%0.0441
Water 0 0.27 1.75E+01 18.02 3.98%0.2209
4.50%
Aziridine, homopolymer 68130-99-4 0.80 0.00E+00 860.00 3.60%0.0042
Water 0.20 1.75E+01 18.02 0.90%0.0499
Enzyme: Coronase 48UL 3.00%
Subtilisin 9014-01-1 0.07 0.00E+00 33,000.00 0.21%0.0000
Water 0 0.93 1.75E+01 18.02 2.79%0.1548
Orangina 1.00%
Limonene 138-86-3 0.55 1.00E+00 136.24 0.55%0.0040
C100 Isomers 106-24-1 0.07 2.00E-01 154.25 0.07%0.0005
Nonvolatile Constituents 5413-60-5 0.38 0.00E+00 300.00 0.38%0.0013
100.06%99.98%2.0107
Sodium C12-C14 Alcohol
Ethoxysulfate 3EO (AES)
Tinopal CBS-X Swiss
2-Phenyl Sulfonic Acid (LAS)

Totals
Sokalan HP20 Polymer
Appendix C - Blending and Transferring Liquid Products
Based on Generic Recipe
Raw Material Constituent CASN
C12-C15 Alcohol Ethoxylate 7EO C12-C15 Alcohol Ethoxylate 6131-39-5
Glycerin Glycerin 56-81-5
Ethanol Ethyl Alcohol 64-17-5
Ethanolamine Ethanolamine 141-43-5
Water Water 0
Benzenesulfonic Acid, 2,2'-([1,1'-biphenyl]-
4,4'-diyldi-2,1-ethenediyl)bis-disodium salt 27344-41-8
N,N-dimethylformamide 68-12-2
Dodecylbenzene Sulfonic Acid 27176-87-0
Sulfuric Acid 7664-93-9
Coconut Oil Fatty Coconut Fatty Acid 61788-47-4
Sodium Laureth Sulfate 68585-34-2
Ethanol 0
Water 0
Aziridine, homopolymer 68130-99-4
Water
Enzyme: Coronase 48UL
Subtilisin 9014-01-1
Water 0
Orangina
Limonene 138-86-3
C100 Isomers 106-24-1
Nonvolatile Constituents 5413-60-5
Sodium C12-C14 Alcohol
Ethoxysulfate 3EO (AES)
Tinopal CBS-X Swiss
2-Phenyl Sulfonic Acid (LAS)

Sokalan HP20 Polymer
Mole Fraction in
Liquid
Partial Pressure in Vapor
(mmHg)
Mole Fraction in Vapor (including
non-VOC)
Mole Fraction in Vapor
(VOC only)
0.0214 0.00000 1.12E-13 1.63E-12
0.1350 0.00041 2.82E-05 4.08E-04
0.0001 0.00482 3.35E-04 4.86E-03
0.0145 0.00586 4.08E-04 5.90E-03
0.5520 9.65960 6.72E-01
0.0002 0.00000 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0.0003 0.00105 7.33E-05 1.06E-03
0.0066 0.00000 3.62E-14 5.24E-13
0.0005 0.00000 3.18E-08
0.0186 0.00000 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0.0123 0.00000 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0.0219 0.97803 6.81E-02 9.86E-01
0.1098 1.92665 1.34E-01
0.0021 0.00000 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0.0248 0.43568 3.03E-02
0.0000 0.00000 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0.0770 1.35059 9.40E-02
0.0020 0.00201 1.40E-04 2.02E-03
0.0002 0.00005 3.14E-06 4.55E-05
0.0006 0.00000 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
1.0000 14.36473 1.00000 1.00
0.99221 0.06893
Non-
Non-
Non-
Non-
Excluding non-VOC
Non-
Appendix C - Blending and Transferring Liquid Products
Based on Generic Recipe
Raw Material Constituent CASN
C12-C15 Alcohol Ethoxylate 7EO C12-C15 Alcohol Ethoxylate 6131-39-5
Glycerin Glycerin 56-81-5
Ethanol Ethyl Alcohol 64-17-5
Ethanolamine Ethanolamine 141-43-5
Water Water 0
Benzenesulfonic Acid, 2,2'-([1,1'-biphenyl]-
4,4'-diyldi-2,1-ethenediyl)bis-disodium salt 27344-41-8
N,N-dimethylformamide 68-12-2
Dodecylbenzene Sulfonic Acid 27176-87-0
Sulfuric Acid 7664-93-9
Coconut Oil Fatty Coconut Fatty Acid 61788-47-4
Sodium Laureth Sulfate 68585-34-2
Ethanol 0
Water 0
Aziridine, homopolymer 68130-99-4
Water
Enzyme: Coronase 48UL
Subtilisin 9014-01-1
Water 0
Orangina
Limonene 138-86-3
C100 Isomers 106-24-1
Nonvolatile Constituents 5413-60-5
Sodium C12-C14 Alcohol
Ethoxysulfate 3EO (AES)
Tinopal CBS-X Swiss
2-Phenyl Sulfonic Acid (LAS)

Sokalan HP20 Polymer
Calculate Molecular
weight of Vapor (VOC
only)
6.61E-10
3.76E-02
2.24E-01
3.60E-01
0.00E+00
7.76E-02
1.72E-10
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
4.54E+01
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
2.76E-01
7.02E-03
0.00E+00
46.39
VOC
VOC
VOC
VOC
VOC
Appendix C - Charging Solids into Pre-Mixer Blending Tanks
Emission Factor Equation (1) from AP 42, Section 13.2.4: Aggregate Handling And Storage Piles
Where:
E = Emission Factor (lb/ton)
k = Particle size multiplier
U = Relative Air Shear Speed (mph)
M = Material moisture content (%)
0.50 %
19 mph
0.74
0.35
0.053
8760 hr/yr
Relative Air Shear Speed Calculation
Rel. Air Shear Speed (ft/s) = sqrt[2 x g (ft/s2) x h (ft)], where:
h = Drop Height (ft)12.00 ft
g = Acceleration due to gravity (ft/s2)32 ft/s2
Calculations for PM Emission Factor
Number of Tanks [2]6 tanks
Batch Time per Tank 4 hr/batch
Batches per year per Tank 2190 batch/yr
Size of Powdered Ink Containers 50 lb/bag
Maximum Solids Charge Rate 20 bag/batch
Maximum Solids Charge Rate 1000 lb/batch
AP-42 PM Emission Factor 9.29E-02 lb/ton
AP-42 PM-10 Emission Factor 4.39E-02 lb/ton
AP-42 PM-2.5 Emission Factor 6.65E-03 lb/ton
Dry PigmentMaterial Delivered
Moisture Content of Solids [1]
AP-42 Particle Size Multiplier (<2.5
µm) [1]
AP-42 Particle Size Multiplier (<30µm)
[1]
Parameters
Relative Air Shear Speed (ft/s)
AP-42 Particle Size Multiplier (<10
µm) [1]
Maximum Operating Hours
Appendix C - Charging Solids into Pre-Mixer Blending Tanks
PM-10 Emissions
PM-10 Emission
Rate per Tank
PM-10 Emission
Rate per Tank
Total Facility PM-
10 Emission Rate
Total Facility PM-
10 Emission Rate
(lb/hr)(ton/yr)(lb/hr)(ton/yr)
5.49E-03 2.40E-02 0.03 0.14
PM-2.5 Emissions
PM-2.5 Emission
Rate per Tank
PM-2.5 Emission
Rate per Tank
Total Facility PM-
2.5 Emission Rate
Total Facility PM-
2.5 Emission Rate
(lb/hr)(ton/yr)(lb/hr)(ton/yr)
8.31E-04 3.64E-03 0.00 0.02
HAP Emissions
HAP Content in
Solids [3]
HAP Emission
Rate per Tank
HAP Emission
Rate per Tank
Total Facility HAP
Emission Rate
Total Facility
HAP Emission
Rate
(%)(lb/hr)(ton/yr)(lb/hr)(ton/yr)
0.20%2.32E-05 1.02E-04 1.39E-04 6.10E-04
Notes:
[1]: From AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume I, Section 13.2.4: Aggregate Handling And Storage Piles.
[2]: For a worst-case emissions analysis, it was assumed that the 6 pre-mixers will be charged with solid
Tinopal CBS-X.
[3]: Tinopal CBS-X contains 0.20% of N,N-dimethylformamide (CAS Number: 68-12-2).
Appendix C - Liquids
Assuming 100% Evaporation
Organic Vapor Losses
S= Saturation Factor from Table 5.2-1
P= Vapor Pressure of liquid is psia (calculated from the table above) = 0.9922 mm Hg = 0.019 psia
M = Molecular weight of vapor (calculated from table above) = 46.39
T= Temperature of liquid loaded in °R (°R = °F + 460) = 528 °R
Saturation Factor is determined as follows:
The above recipe does not represent any product in current or planned production. It is a generic representation of all batches, and it was chosen to
be conservative, in that emissions would be higher than those from any actual recipe. For example: the ethanol concentration is higher than in any
existing recipe; salts, which lower the partial vapor pressure of volatile constituents, are not included; and water, which also lowers the partial vapor
pressure of volatile constituents, is reduced.
The evaporation of volatile constituents and vapor losses during tank filling and transfers is analogous to looses during the transportation of
petroleum products and is therefore quantified based on AP-42, Chapter 5. Loading losses = 12.46 X S X P XM / T where:
There are three points at which liquid products may have VOC emissions:
1) Blending of raw materials to make products - The saturation factor for blending is based on submerged
loading and dedicated normal service. Our tanks are often cleaned between batches by praying water into
them. The small air emissions from cleaning would add to the emissions from submerged loading of a clean
mixer, being roughly equal to emissions from dedicated service. Consequently, the Saturation Factor,
S(blending) = 0.60
2) Transfer of blended products to storage tanks - The Saturation Factor for transfer to storage tanks is also
based on submerged loading and dedicated normal service or transfer to a clean tank with small emissions
from cleaning. Consequently, the Saturation Factor, S(transfer) = 0.60
3) Transfer from storage tanks to fillers - This activity does not results in air emissions because product is
enclosed in this phase
4) The Saturation Factor for filling bottles is based on splash loading of a clean vessel. S(filling)= 1.45.
Overall Saturation Factor = S(blending) + S(transfer) + S(filling) = 0.60 + 0.60 + 1.45 = 2.65
Appendix C - Liquids
Overall VOC Emissions from Liquids Blending and Packaging = 12.46 X S X P X M / T = 12.46 X 2.65 X .019191 X 46.39 / 528
= 0.055679 pounds per 1000 gallons of liquid product
= 6.684192 pounds per 1,000,000 pounds of liquid product
Potential to Emit for Blending and Transferring Liquid Products
2018 Total Liquids Production=pounds of detergent =541.5408 million pounds of detergent
2.5 X Actual Production
pounds of detergent =1,353.85 million pounds of detergent
PTE (lbs/yr)PTE (tons/yr)
9049.407 4.52470351
Component
VOC
(Annualized based on 1st 11 months of the year)
541,540,800
1,353,852,000
Potential =
Appendix C - Maintenance Paint Booth
Estimated maximum number of cans used 348 can/yr
Actual number of cans purchased 180 can/yr
Highest net weight of cans 15 oz.
Assumed Transfer Efficiency 25%
Maximum % Solids 3.2%
Maximum VOC content 58%
Maximum HAP content 7%
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 3%
Xylene 3%
Ethylbenzene 1%
Filter Control Efficiency 99%
Current Maximum Aerosol Emissions
Annual Uncontrolled
Emission Rate
Annual Controlled
Emission Rate
(ton/yr)(ton/yr)
PM 3.92E-03 3.92E-05
VOC 9.40E-02 9.40E-02
Total HAP 1.14E-02 1.14E-02
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 4.89E-03 4.89E-03
Xylene 4.89E-03 4.89E-03
Ethylbenzene 1.63E-03 1.63E-03
The maintenance paint booth is currently only used for painting parts with aerosol spray paint cans. The booth is equipped with high
efficiency over-spray filters.
*Maximum HAP content from Spray Paint with the
highest HAP Content (Safety Orange Gloss, Safety Red
Gloss, and Safety Yellow Gloss)
Pollutant
Appendix C - Railcar Unloading
SODA ASH FUGITIVE EMISSIONS
Emission Factor Equation (1) from AP 42, Section 13.2.4: Aggregate Handling And Storage Piles
Where:
E = Emission Factor (lb/ton)
k = Particle size multiplier
U = Relative Air Shear Speed (mph)
M = Material moisture content (%)
Material Delivered Soda Ash
Moisture Content of Solids [1]0.50 %
Relative Air Shear Speed 7 mph
AP-42 Particle Size Multiplier (<30µm) [1]0.74
AP-42 Particle Size Multiplier (<10 µm) [1]0.35
AP-42 Particle Size Multiplier (<2.5 µm) [1]0.053
Relative Air Shear Speed Calculation
Rel. Air Shear Speed (ft/s) = sqrt[2 x g (ft/s2) x h (ft)], where:
h = Drop Height (ft)1.50 ft
*Estimated height of Railcar hopper to ground
g = Acceleration due to gravity (ft/s2)32 ft/s2
Soda Ash Cone Pile
Diameter of Pile 3.5 feet
Height of Pile 0.417 feet
Volume of Pile 1.34 ft3
Density of Soda Ash 21.03 lb/ft3
Mass of Pile 28.10 lb
Number of Piles Under Railcar 2 piles/railcar
Number of Railcars per Year 208 railcar/yr
Assuming 1 railcar fills the silo, the soda ash silo is filled 4x per week.
Mass of Material Leaked into Piles 11690 lb/yr
Calculated PM Emission Factor
AP-42 PM Emission Factor 2.40E-02 lb/ton
AP-42 PM-10 Emission Factor 1.14E-02 lb/ton
AP-42 PM-2.5 Emission Factor 1.72E-03 lb/ton
PM Emissions
PM Emission Rate PM Emission Rate
(lb/yr)(ton/yr)
1.40E-01 7.02E-05
PM-10 Emissions
PM-10 Emission Rate PM-10 Emission Rate
(lb/yr)(ton/yr)
6.64E-02 3.32E-05
PM-2.5 Emissions
PM-2.5 Emission Rate PM-2.5 Emission Rate
(lb/yr)(ton/yr)
1.01E-02 5.03E-06
Parameters
SALT FUGITIVE EMISSIONS
Emission Factor Equation (1) from AP 42, Section 13.2.4: Aggregate Handling And Storage Piles
Where:
E = Emission Factor (lb/ton)
k = Particle size multiplier
U = Relative Air Shear Speed (mph)
M = Material moisture content (%)
Material Delivered Salt
Moisture Content of Solids [1]0.50 %
Relative Air Shear Speed (ft/s)7 mph
AP-42 Particle Size Multiplier (<30µm) [1]0.74
AP-42 Particle Size Multiplier (<10 µm) [1]0.35
AP-42 Particle Size Multiplier (<2.5 µm) [1]0.053
Relative Air Shear Speed Calculation
Rel. Air Shear Speed (ft/s) = sqrt[2 x g (ft/s2) x h (ft)], where:
h = Drop Height (ft)1.50 ft
*Estimated height of Railcar hopper to ground
g = Acceleration due to gravity (ft/s2)32 ft/s2
Salt Cone Pile
Diameter of Pile 3.5 feet
Height of Pile 0.417 feet
Volume of Pile 1.34 ft3
Density of Salt (as sodium chloride)2.17 lb/ft3
Mass of Pile 2.90 lb
Number of Piles Under Railcar 2 piles/railcar
Number of Railcars per Year 104 railcar/yr
Assuming 1 railcar fills the silo, the salt silo is filled 2x per week.
Mass of Material Leaked into Piles 603 lb/yr
Calculated PM Emission Factor
AP-42 PM Emission Factor 2.40E-02 lb/ton
AP-42 PM-10 Emission Factor 1.14E-02 lb/ton
AP-42 PM-2.5 Emission Factor 1.72E-03 lb/ton
PM Emissions
PM Emission Rate PM Emission Rate
(lb/yr)(ton/yr)
7.25E-03 3.62E-06
PM-10 Emissions
PM-10 Emission Rate PM-10 Emission Rate
(lb/yr)(ton/yr)
3.43E-03 1.71E-06
PM-2.5 Emissions
PM-2.5 Emission Rate PM-2.5 Emission Rate
(lb/yr)(ton/yr)
5.19E-04 2.60E-07
Parameters
Combined Railcar PM Emissions
Soda Ash Salt Total Emissions
PM (ton/yr)7.02E-05 3.62E-06 7.39E-05
PM-10 (ton/yr)3.32E-05 1.71E-06 3.49E-05
PM-2.5 (ton/yr)5.03E-06 2.60E-07 5.29E-06
Notes:
[1]: From AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume I, Section 13.2.4: Aggregate Handling And Storage Piles.
Appendix C - Storage Tank Emissions Summary
Uncontrolled Hourly VOC
Emission Rate
Uncontrolled Annual VOC
Emission Rate
Controlled Annual VOC
Emission Rate
(lb/hr)(ton/yr)(ton/yr)
Tank 27 7EO Synthetic 25-7 NA Negligible [1]Negligible [1]NA
Tank 22 Coco Fatty NA Negligible [1]Negligible [1]NA
Tank 63 Armosoft DEQ Ethanol 0.080 0.351 0.018 [3]
Tank 49 Stepanol NA Negligible [1]Negligible [1]NA
Tank 66 PEG 400 Polyethylene Glycol 0.004 0.017 NA
Tank 52 Citric Acid Citric Acid 0.011 0.050 NA
Ethanol 0.049 0.213 NA
Isopropyl Alcohol 0.002 0.008 NA
Tank 23 9EO Non-ionic (L24-9)NA Negligible [1]Negligible [1]NA
Tank 21 Natural 7EO Non-ionic NA Negligible [1]Negligible [1]NA
Tank 45 Steol CS-270 Ether Sulfate (AES)NA Negligible [1]Negligible [1]NA
Tank 65 SLES 70%NA Negligible [1]Negligible [1]NA
Tank 63A Armosoft DEQ Ethanol 0.080 0.351 0.018 [3]
Tank 65A SLES 70%NA Negligible [1]Negligible [1]NA
Tank 1 Sulfonic Acid NA Negligible [1]Negligible [1]NA
Tank 2 Sodium Silicate Liquid Alkaline NA Negligible [2]Negligible [2]NA
0.226 0.990 0.035
Notes:
[2]: This tank's content does not contain organic material.
[3]: Uncontrolled VOC emissions from tank used in PTE Summary.
[1]: The molar mass and vapor pressure of this tank's contents are not conducive to evaporation. The low vapor pressure and the high molar mass of
this material indicates that it does not have a tendency to evaporate.
PollutantContentsTank ID
Total
Tank 60 200 Proof Ethanol
Appendix C - Storage Tank Emissions
Tank 63 & 63A (Armsoft DEQ)
Outdoor Storage Tank Parameters
Number of Tanks 2
Capacity 34,000 gal/tank
Diameter 13 ft
Height 34.5 ft (w/ a 0.4062 ft conical top section)
Tank Contents Armosoft DEQ
Density 8.342 lb/gal
Control Efficiency of Carbon Canisters 95%Carbtrol G-1 Vapor Phase Carbon Canisters will be used for both DEQ Tanks
14,579,696 lb/yr
1,747,840.16 gal/yr
The following table is taken from Emission Master Tanks output. Report summaries are attached in Appendix D.
Per Vessel: 34,000 gal Storage Tank
Uncontrolled
Working Loss
Uncontrolled
Breathing
Loss
Uncontrolled
Total Loss
Controlled
Total Loss
(lb/yr)(lb/yr)(lb/yr)(lb/yr)
Ethanol
(VOC)697.7357 4.2599 701.9956 35.10
Notes:
Tanks modeling assumes a maximum annual throughput based on the maximum monthly throughput forecast from
June 2022 to May 2023, with a 15% conservative multiplier.
The storage tank emissions were modeled using the worst case plant processing rate of
The following emissions are based on Emission Master Tanks Software based on 2019 EPA Revision.
Pollutant
Appendix C - Storage Tank Emissions
Tank 60 (Ethanol)
Outdoor Storage Tank Parameters
Capacity 29,000 gal/tank
Diameter 14 ft
Height 26 ft (w/ a 0.4375 ft conical top section)
Tank Contents
Density 6.843 lb/gal
4,149,985 lb/yr
606,465.88 gal/yr
The following table is taken from Emission Master Tanks output. Report summaries are attached in Appendix D.
Vessel: 29,000 gal Storage Tank
Working Loss Breathing
Loss Total Loss
(lb/yr)(lb/yr)(lb/yr)
Ethanol
(VOC)407.3536 18.8907 426.2443
Isopropyl
Alcohol
(VOC)
15.5041 0.7272 16.2313
Notes:
200 Proof Ethanol
The following emissions are based on Emission Master Tanks Software based on 2019 EPA Revision.
The storage tank emissions were modeled using the worst case plant processing rate of
Pollutant
Tanks modeling assumes a maximum annual throughput based on the maximum monthly throughput
forecast from June 2022 to May 2023, with a 15% conservative multiplier.
Appendix C - Storage Tank Emissions
Tank 66 (PEG 400)
Mix Tank Parameters
Capacity 29,000 gal
109777 L
Tank Contents
Tank Radius 7.0 ft
Tank Circumference 43.98 ft
Surface Area of Liquid 153.94 sqft
Single Load Batch Time 4 hr/batch
Max. Operation Hours 8760 hr/yr
Number of Batches 2,190 batch/yr
Max. Volume Processed 63,510,000 gal/yr
1. Polyethylene Glycol Vessel Filling Emissions
E VOC = 6.92 x (S x P x M x Q) / T (Note 1)
Parameter Symbol
Saturation Factor (Note 2)S 1.45
Vapor Pressure P 4.35E-05 psia
Vapor Molecular Weight M 400.00 lb/lb-mol
Volume of Material Loaded Q 63510 103 gal/yr
Temperature of Loaded Liquid T 327.6 °K
0.004 lb/hr
0.015 lb/batch
Notes
PEG 400
[2]:Saturation Factor for Splash Loading of a Clean Cargo Tank from AP-42 Table 5.2-1, " Saturation (S) Factors for Calculating Petroleum Liquid
For calculating emissions, assume that the most volatile solvent is at its saturation level in every mixing vessel's headspace. So, as the vessel is
filled, it will displace the saturated air in the headspace to the exterior of the vessel.
Air emissions are calculated using the ideal gas law, PVM=mRT.
Value
Loading VOC Emissions EVOC
[1]: Equation to calculate emissions found in "Methods for Estimating Air Emissions from Paint, Ink, and Other Coating Manufacturing
Facilities." EIIP. Volume II, Chapter 8, Page 4. February 2005.
Appendix C - Storage Tank Emissions
Tank 52 (Citric Acid)
Mix Tank Parameters
Capacity 29,000 gal
109777 L
Tank Contents
Tank Radius 7.0 ft
Tank Circumference 43.98 ft
Surface Area of Liquid 153.94 sqft
Single Load Batch Time 4 hr/batch
Max. Operation Hours 8760 hr/yr
Number of Batches 2,190 batch/yr
Max. Volume Processed 63,510,000 gal/yr
1. Citric Acid Vessel Filling Emissions
E VOC = 6.92 x (S x P x M x Q) / T (Note 1)
Parameter Symbol
Saturation Factor (Note 2)S 1.45
Vapor Pressure P 1.45E-03 psia
Vapor Molecular Weight M 46.07 lb/lb-mol
Volume of Material Loaded Q 63510 103 gal/yr
Temperature of Loaded Liquid T 426.5 °K
0.01 lb/hr
0.05 lb/batch
Notes
Loading VOC Emissions EVOC
[1]: Equation to calculate emissions found in "Methods for Estimating Air Emissions from Paint, Ink, and Other Coating Manufacturing
Facilities." EIIP. Volume II, Chapter 8, Page 4. February 2005.
Citric Acid
[2]:Saturation Factor for Splash Loading of a Clean Cargo Tank from AP-42 Table 5.2-1, " Saturation (S) Factors for Calculating Petroleum Liquid
Loading Losses."
For calculating emissions, assume that the most volatile solvent is at its saturation level in every mixing vessel's headspace. So, as the vessel is
filled, it will displace the saturated air in the headspace to the exterior of the vessel.
Air emissions are calculated using the ideal gas law, PVM=mRT.
Value
Appendix H - Cost Analysis for Baghouses and Carbon Canisters
COST ANALYSIS FOR A BAGHOUSE ON PRE-MIXER
For a baghouse flow rate range between 2,000 and 10,000 CFM, the average cost ranges between $10,000 and $80,000 [1].
Therefore, for a range between 2,000 and 10,000 cfm, the ratio of cost per cfm is:8.75$ /cfm
Assuming that the pre-mixer exhaust flow rate is 3,000 cfm, the cost of a baghouse would be: $26,250.00
$52,500.00
PM Emission Rate for Different Baghouse Performances
Baghouse
Performance Flow Rate
(gr/dscf)(cfm)(lb/hr)(ton/yr)
0.005 3000 0.13 0.56
0.01 3000 0.26 1.13
0.02 3000 0.51 2.25
Notes:
COST ANALYSIS FOR A CARBON CANISTER ON TANKS 63 AND 63A
From the quote from Industrial Air Purification, Inc. (IAP), the cost per carbon canister is:$13,456.80
Including installation (assumed to be double the cost of the canister), the total cost per canister is:$26,913.60
The PTE uncontrolled VOC from each tank is:0.351 ton/yr
Controlled emissions from each tank, fitted with a carbon canister with a control efficiency of 95% is:0.018 ton/yr
The cost per ton VOC removed, for a carbon canister with a control efficiency of 95% is:$80,713.06 /ton VOC
Therefore, the cost per ton of VOC removed of $83,045.36 exceeds typical BACT cost effectiveness.
Because the PM-10 emissions from the pre-mixer are 0.19 ton/yr, which emits less than half of the PM emissions from a baghouse with a grain loading
of 0.005 gr/dscf, adding a baghouse on the pre-mixer is not a justifiable cost for these operations.
[1]: Average cost of a baghouse from U.S. Air Filtration, Inc., "How Much Does a Dust Collector Cost?" April 2021.
<https://www.usairfiltration.com/how-much-does-a-dust-collector-cost/>
PM Emission Rate
In addition, there is also the cost to install a baghouse, which was assumed to be double the cost of
the baghouse. In total, the cost of the baghouse and installation would be:

Appendix E: Armosoft DEQ Laboratory Results

PETRO-LUBRICANT TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
Member A.S.T.M.
February 17, 2022
Test Report 22021502
116 Sunset Inn Road
Lafayette, N.J. 07848
phone [phone]
www.petrolube. com
Marion Environmental
115 Parmenas Lane
Chattanooga, IN 37405
ATTN: Mr. Randall Woodlee
RE: Your Sample of February 15, 2022 Final Report
Dear Mme.,
Analysis of your sample has been completed. The results are as follows:
SAMPLE: REWOQUAT
Lab# 22021502
TEST METHOD
ASTM D2879
ASTM D2879
ASTM D2879
ASTM D2879
DESCRIPTION
Vapor Pressure by Isotenlscope @ 115°F
Vapor Pressure by Isotenlscope @ 140°F
Vapor Pressure by Isotenlscope @ 165°F
Vapor Pressure by Isotenlscope @ 185°F
RESULTS
Graph Attached
*95.5 mmHg (Extrapolated)
168.4 mmHg
265.0 mmHg
407.5 mmHg
*Note- Sample beginning to solidify @ 140 °F, unable to make direct measurement at 115°F
TEST METHOD
ASTM D2879
ASTM D2879
ASTM D2879
SAMPLE: ARMASOFT
Lab# 22021503
DESCRIPTION
Vapor Pressure by Isotenlscope @ 115°F
Vapor Pressure by Isotenlscope @ 140°F
Vapor Pressure by Isotenlscope @ 165°F
RESULTS
Graph Attached
101.7 mmHg
177.4 mmHg
297.9 mmHg
Please call If you have any questions regarding this report.
Resj^ectfully submftted.
Tohn WIntermute
Technical Director
JW:ak
Attachments (2-ASTM D2879 Graphs)
Letters and reports shall not be reproduced except in fuH without written permission of Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories. The information herein applies only to die specific matenal or products tested and is
for the exclusive use of the diente to whom they aiB adriressed. The liability of Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories shall be limited to the anount of compensation paid for testing services. No warranty of any kind
is implied.
2.7
2.6
2.5
D)
h
o
3
(/>
0)2.3
O)
o
®2.2
0)
V)
(0
m
2.1
1.9
0.0027
Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories, Inc.
Marion Environmental
ASTM D2879 Vapor Pressure by Isoteniscope
407.5 mm Hg fm 185"F
V
S'
A
V
V
V
sS
s 2bo.U mm Hg @
s
s Si
s
ss
V
>
s
s
SS
sS
V s
s ¥
r \
s
V-
A
168.4 mm Hg 5) 140°F S
V
s
s.
s
s
s
s
95.5 mm Hg 115°F H3
extapolated value S,
V
V-
0.0028 0.0029 0.003 0.0031
Reciprocal degrees Kelvin
0.0032
February 17, 2022 Sample: REWOQUAT Lab# 22021502
2.7
2.6
2.5
3
h
o
i_
3
(A
p2.3
o
o
!2.2
0)
(0
<0
OQ
2.1
1.9
Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories, inc.
Marion Environmental
ASTM D2879 Vapor Pressure by isoteniscope
s
V
V
S
N
s
S
s
\
s.
s
s
V
it 297.9 mm Ha (a.165°F
\
s.
s.
s
V
*
3
3
177.4 mm Hg 140°Fw
ss.
>
\
101.7 mm Hg 115-F \
W S
0.0027 0.0026 0.0029 0.003 0.0031 0.0032
Reciprocal degrees Kelvin
February 17, 2022 Sample: ARMASOFT Lab# 22021503

Appendix F: Emission Master Model Extended Report

Emission Master 8.4.4.31 6:08:53 PM, 10/3/2022 page 1
C:\Users\Anielle.Duritza\OneDrive - ERM\Private\Desktop\Projects\Henkel\Henkel TANKS_SLC\Henkel_SLC.emm
Title Page
Product: Henkel_SLC
Process: Tanks 60 & 63
Process Cycle Time: 365 days
Final Product Amount: 2.35430604e6 gal
Evaluation Date: 6/10/2022
File Name: C:\Users\Anielle.Duritza\OneDrive - ERM\Private\Desktop\Projects\Henkel\Henkel
TANKS_SLC\Henkel_SLC.emm
Connected Database: \\usbdclic01\EMTanks\Emaster
Calculation type: MACT98
Condenser Calc. type:Single Stage
Charge Calc. type: Initial Composition
Material Balance: Subtract Emissions
Last Saved User: Anielle.Duritza
Last Saved Time: 8:42:26 AM, 6/15/2022
Comment:
Defined Activities
1) [Storage] Tank 60
2) [Storage] Tank 63
Emission Master 8.4.4.31 6:08:53 PM, 10/3/2022 page 2
C:\Users\Anielle.Duritza\OneDrive - ERM\Private\Desktop\Projects\Henkel\Henkel TANKS_SLC\Henkel_SLC.emm
1: Storage Tank Activity
Title: Tank 60
Start Date: 1/1/2022
End Date: 12/31/2022
Elapsed Time: 365.0 days
Vent ID:
Noncondensable: Air @ 0 Nm³/h Saturation: 100% Pressure: -2.08 psig
Using Monthly Avg. Temp.
Location: Utah, Salt Lake City Volume Throughput: 606465.88 gal
Crude Oil Factor-Kc: 1
Vessel Name: Tank 60 - SLC
Void Vol.: 30,108.07 gal Work Vol.: 29,000 gal
No Control Devices
Final Contents 29000.0 gal 190861.9392 lb -0.1 °C
Weight Pure-Vp W[i] X[i] A[i] X*Vp*A
[Liquid Phase] (lb) (kPa) (kPa)
Ethanol 181815.0832 1.557 0.953 0.963 1 1.4998
Isopropyl Alcohol 9046.8559 1.0977 0.047 0.037 1 0.0403
Emissions From Vessel: Tank 60 - SLC
Effective Vp Working Breathing Total Rate
[Non Condensables] (mm Hg) (lb) (lb) (lb) (lb/hr)
Air 82.6796 5101.7343 192.3078 5294.042 0.6043
[Condensables] (mm Hg) (lb) (lb) (lb) (lb/hr)
Ethanol 4.186 407.3536 18.8907 426.2443 0.0487
Isopropyl Alcohol 0.1222 15.5041 0.7272 16.2313 0.0019
Emission Master 8.4.4.31 6:08:53 PM, 10/3/2022 page 3
C:\Users\Anielle.Duritza\OneDrive - ERM\Private\Desktop\Projects\Henkel\Henkel TANKS_SLC\Henkel_SLC.emm
2: Storage Tank Activity
Title: Tank 63
Start Date: 1/1/2022
End Date: 12/31/2022
Elapsed Time: 365.0 days
Vent ID:
Noncondensable: Air @ 0 Nm³/h Saturation: 100% Pressure: -2.08 psig
Using Monthly Avg. Temp.
Location: Utah, Salt Lake City Volume Throughput: 1.74784016e6 gal
Crude Oil Factor-Kc: 1
Vessel Name: Tank 63 - SLC
Void Vol.: 34,389.32 gal Work Vol.: 34,000 gal
No Control Devices
Final Contents 34000.0 gal 283627.8524 lb -0.1 °C
Weight Pure-Vp W[i] X[i] A[i] X*Vp*A
[Liquid Phase] (lb) (kPa) (kPa)
Armsoft DEQ 283627.8524 1.5235 1.0 1.0 1 1.5235
Emissions From Vessel: Tank 63 - SLC
Effective Vp Working Breathing Total Rate
[Non Condensables] (mm Hg) (lb) (lb) (lb) (lb/hr)
Air 83.6952 11162.6528 58.1754 11220.8282 1.2809
[Condensables] (mm Hg) (lb) (lb) (lb) (lb/hr)
Armsoft DEQ 3.2926 697.7357 4.2599 701.9956 0.0801
Emission Master 8.4.4.31 6:08:53 PM, 10/3/2022 page 4
C:\Users\Anielle.Duritza\OneDrive - ERM\Private\Desktop\Projects\Henkel\Henkel TANKS_SLC\Henkel_SLC.emm
Summary Page
Emissions for (Unspecified Vent):
CAS Avg. Rate Max. Rate Total Weight
Air 132259-10-0 1.8853 lb/hr 1.2809 lb/hr 16514.8702 lb
Armsoft DEQ 64-17-5 0.0801 lb/hr 0.0801 lb/hr 701.9956 lb
Ethanol 64-17-5 0.0487 lb/hr 0.0487 lb/hr 426.2443 lb
Isopropyl Alcohol 67-63-0 0.0019 lb/hr 0.0019 lb/hr 16.2313 lb
Total emissions for all vents:
CAS Avg. Rate Max. Rate Total Weight
Air 132259-10-0 1.8853 lb/hr 1.2809 lb/hr 16514.8702 lb
Armsoft DEQ 64-17-5 0.0801 lb/hr 0.0801 lb/hr 701.9956 lb
Ethanol 64-17-5 0.0487 lb/hr 0.0487 lb/hr 426.2443 lb
Isopropyl Alcohol 67-63-0 0.0019 lb/hr 0.0019 lb/hr 16.2313 lb

Appendix G: NSPS Operating Plan for Tanks 63 & 63A

Operating Plan
Air Pollution Control of Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Tanks
40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb

This plan was drafted in order to satisfy the requirement of 40 CFR §60.113b(c)(1)(i) of the New Source
Performance Standard for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Tanks. This plan provides the necessary
information needed to assure compliance with the 95% VOC reduction standard in 40 CFR
§60.112b(a)(3)(ii). The plan addresses monitoring the performance of the air pollution control device
and leaks from the closed vent system as required by 40 CFR §60.113b(c)(1)(ii) and (c)(2).
The control device used for this application is a carbon canister. Carbon canisters are effective for
storage tanks due to their ability to treat low flows. Use of a carbon canister as an air pollution control
device can meet a performance level of 95% VOC control efficiency as EPA documentation indicates that
activated carbon can reach control efficiencies that range from 95% to 98% under maximum loading
conditions.
The stream entering each carbon canister is from a fixed roof storage tank that contains raw materials
with the volatile component being ethanol. Maximum loading on the canister occurs during tank filling.
The filling rate of the tanks is 5000 gallons (802.7 cubic feet) per 30 minutes. This translates to 26.76
cubic feet per minute exhaust from the storage tank into the closed vent. Maximum gauge pressure is 8
inches of water column and maximum temperature is 160°F. A maximum VOC loading was measured
during filling to be 242 ppmv (VOC). No breathing loss releases from the storage tank are anticipated
because the tanks are maintained at near constant temperatures. The manufacturer’s design
specifications for the control devices are attached.

Monitoring and recordkeeping the performance of the carbon canisters:
The carbon will be monitored weekly for break-through at the exit of the canister with a handheld
monitor such as a flame detector or photoionization detector or a detector used for Method 25a of 40
CFR 60 Appendix A. The outlet of the canister will be monitored while the tanks are filling. In the
absence of tank filling during a given week, no monitoring will take place. The monitoring equipment
will be calibrated per manufacturer specifications. A concentration detected of 10 ppmv of VOC or
more will signal that a canister is ready to be replaced. The spent canister will be removed and taken
offsite.
Each reading, time and date taken, and initials of the reader will be recorded in a log. The log will also
indicate the time and date the canister was replaced. The log will be maintained onsite for inspection.
Monitoring Leaks from the Closed Vent System Leading to the Carbon Canister
In accordance with 40 CFR §60.112b(a)(3)(i), the closed vent system shall be monitored in accordance
with 40 CFR §60.485(b). The standard for a detected leak is 500 ppmv VOC above background levels.
Monitoring, repair or replacement of the closed vent system will be logged. Like monitoring for break-
though, leak monitoring will be conducted weekly while tank filling is taking place. A leak detected must
be repaired or replaced in a timely manner.
Initial Inspection:
The initial inspection shall be performed for the closed vent system as provided in 40 CFR §60.482-
10(f)(1) and (f)(2) in accordance with 40 CFR §60.485(b) in the following steps:
1. Method 21 of 40 CFR 60 Appendix A shall be used to determine the presence of a leak. The
instrument shall be calibrated before use each day of its use by the procedures specified in
Method 21. The following calibration gases shall be used:
a. Zero air (less than 10 ppm of hydrocarbon in air); and
b. A mixture of methane or n-hexane and air at a concentration of about, but less than,
10,000 ppm methane or n-hexane.
2. While filling the tank, measure the reading upwind of the point intended for measurement and
recorded the reading as background concentration.
3. Take a reading as close as possible at the points inspected on the closed vent system. Record
that reading.
4. Make repairs or parts replacements to correct leaks in a prompt manner.
5. Recheck measurements to assure repairs were successful.
6. Log the event, time and dates of measurements and repairs. Include names of participants.
On-Going Annual Inspections:
For a hard piped closed vent
In accordance with 40 CFR §60.482-10(f)(1)(ii) the inspection will consist of a visual inspection for visible,
audible, or olfactory indications of leaks. Log the time, date, person and result of the inspection. Also
log repairs, verification inspections, and associated dates.
For a ducted closed vent
In accordance with 40 CFR §60.482-10(f)(2)(ii) the inspection will be performed in the manner
performed for the initial inspection. Log the time, date, person and result of the inspection. Also log
repairs, verification inspections and associated dates.

25
4
4

H
i
g
h
w
a
y

7
0

E
a
s
t
,
Co
o
k
e
v
i
l
l
e
,

T
N

3
8
5
0
6
Sa
l
e
s
@
I
A
P
-
A
i
r
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
.
c
o
m
ww
w
.
I
A
P
-
A
i
r
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
.
c
o
m
Ca
r
b
o
n

F
i
l
t
e
r
Ca
r
b
o
n

F
i
l
t
e
r
-D
i
m
e
n
s
i
o
n
:

1
5
"

x

2
6
"

(
3
8
0

x

6
6
0
m
m
)
-M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
:

M
3
0
0
0

+

M
9
0
0
0

Appendix H: Cost Analysis Supporting Calculations

Appendix H - Cost Analysis for Baghouses and Carbon Canisters
COST ANALYSIS FOR A BAGHOUSE ON PRE-MIXER
For a baghouse flow rate range between 2,000 and 10,000 CFM, the average cost ranges between $10,000 and $80,000 [1].
Therefore, for a range between 2,000 and 10,000 cfm, the ratio of cost per cfm is:8.75$ /cfm
Assuming that the pre-mixer exhaust flow rate is 3,000 cfm, the cost of a baghouse would be: $26,250.00
$52,500.00
PM Emission Rate for Different Baghouse Performances
Baghouse
Performance Flow Rate
(gr/dscf)(cfm)(lb/hr)(ton/yr)
0.005 3000 0.13 0.56
0.01 3000 0.26 1.13
0.02 3000 0.51 2.25
Notes:
COST ANALYSIS FOR A CARBON CANISTER ON TANKS 63 AND 63A
From the quote from Industrial Air Purification, Inc. (IAP), the cost per carbon canister is:$13,456.80
Including installation (assumed to be double the cost of the canister), the total cost per canister is:$26,913.60
The PTE uncontrolled VOC from each tank is:0.351 ton/yr
Controlled emissions from each tank, fitted with a carbon canister with a control efficiency of 95% is:0.018 ton/yr
The cost per ton VOC removed, for a carbon canister with a control efficiency of 95% is:$80,713.06 /ton VOC
Therefore, the cost per ton of VOC removed of $83,045.36 exceeds typical BACT cost effectiveness.
Because the PM-10 emissions from the pre-mixer are 0.19 ton/yr, which emits less than half of the PM emissions from a baghouse with a grain
loading of 0.005 gr/dscf, adding a baghouse on the pre-mixer is not a justifiable cost for these operations.
[1]: Average cost of a baghouse from U.S. Air Filtration, Inc., "How Much Does a Dust Collector Cost?" April 2021.
<https://www.usairfiltration.com/how-much-does-a-dust-collector-cost/>
PM Emission Rate
In addition, there is also the cost to install a baghouse, which was assumed to be double the cost of
the baghouse. In total, the cost of the baghouse and installation would be:
1
Sub Total 26,913.60
KY STATE TAX (6%)1,614.82
Total $28,528.42
Thank you for the opportunity! Please contact me if you have any questions.
Estimate #Q-220792
Estimate Date 02/25/2022
Reference VOC Tank Exhaust
Sales Rep Michael Bradshaw
Lead Time Stock
Terms Net 30
Shipping Terms Prepay & Add
Industrial Air Purification, Inc.
580 Technology Drive
Sparta, Tennessee 38583
U.S.A
Phone [phone]
Bill To:
Henkel US Operations Corporation
1 Henkel Way
Rocky Hill CT 06067
Ship To:
Henkel US Operations Corporation
385 Southwood Court
Bowling Green KY 42101
Line Item Description Qty Rate Amount
1 MFE-1100 IAP Air Products Mobile Collector, MFE-1100, includes:
- aluminum mesh pre-filter (washable)
- 33 lb. carbon filter (refillable)
- HEPA Filter (disposable)
- filter gauge
- 6" or 8" inlet
- casters with brake
- powder coated blue
Note, the following to be removed before shipment: movable arm
By Customer:
- grounding/bonding
2 13,456.80 26,913.60
2 MFE-1100-HE MFE-1100, HEPA Filter and Frame. (1) per unit. 27 lbs.2 0.00 0.00
Terms & Conditions
This quotation is limited to and conditioned upon acceptance of Industrial Air Purification's Terms and Conditions of Sale. These terms are
incorporated herein by reference. By placing an order, customer accepts these terms. You may find a current copy at https://www.
industrialairpurification.com/termsofsale
Customer Authorized Signature
QUOTATIONQUOTATION
Christine Bodell <[e-mail]>
Henkel Corporation Administrative Amendment_DAQE-AN104630031-23
Alyssa A Trujillo <[e-mail]>Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 1:51 PM
To: Christine Bodell <[e-mail]>
Cc: Roger Akel <[e-mail]>, Andrew Riddick <[e-mail]>
Hi Christine,

Henkel Corporation would like to pursue an Administrative Amendment to Approval Order (AO) DAQE-AN104630031-23 instead of the
Reduction of an Air Pollutant submitted and date March 8, 2024 (attached). During our call this morning, it was determined that an
administrative amendment is the most appropriate avenue to accomplish Henkel’s intent.

The objective is to allow for the storage of a material in Tanks 63 and 63A without being restricted to a specific brand name as it
appears in the AO. Currently, the AO lists the brand name “Armosoft DEQ (Ethanol)” may be stored in Storage Tanks 63 and 63A at
the following locations in the AO:
1. AO Condition II.A.14; and
2. AO Condition II.B.6.a(C)

Henkel would like to replace “Armosoft DEQ (Ethanol)” with “Volatile Organic Liquid with a True Vapor Pressure not to exceed 34.3
kPa”. The True Vapor Pressure is measured by ASTM D2879. This vapor pressure is consistent with the NOI submitted for the
development of AO DAQE-AN104630031-23. This NOI is attached.

Thank you,

Alyssa Trujillo
Sr. Safety, Health, & Environmental Specialist
Henkel Corporation

| SLC Manufacturing USA
Supply Chain Laundry & Home Care
3540 West 1987 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84104

Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Web: www.henkel.com

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message may contain confidenal and/or privileged informaon. If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not use its contents for any purpose, advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
message and any aachments without retaining any copy.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alyssa A Trujillo <[e-mail]>
To: Christine Bodell <[e-mail]>
Cc: Roger Akel <[e-mail]>, Andrew Riddick <[e-mail]>
Bcc:
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:33:44 +0000
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: Henkel Corporation Notification_DAQE-AN104630031-23
Absolutely, we will talk to you tomorrow.

Thank you,

Alyssa Trujillo
Sr. Safety, Health, & Environmental Specialist
Henkel Corporation

| SLC Manufacturing USA
Supply Chain Laundry & Home Care
3540 West 1987 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84104

Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Web: www.henkel.com

From: Christine Bodell <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 3:32 PM
To: Alyssa A Trujillo <[e-mail]>
Cc: Roger Akel <[e-mail]>; Andrew Riddick <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: Henkel Corporation Notification_DAQE-AN104630031-23

This message is from an EXTERNAL SENDER – be CAUTIOUS, particularly with links and attachments
1130 works for me. I will send an invite.

I just had some questions about the calculations/emission estimate approach. It would probably be easier to talk through them rather
than go back and forth via email.

Thanks,
Christine

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 3:29 PM Alyssa A Trujillo <[e-mail]> wrote:
Hi Christine,

Would 11:30am MDT work for you? Myself and Roger are available at this time; I am unsure if Andrew will be able to join us.

Thank you,

Alyssa Trujillo
Sr. Safety, Health, & Environmental Specialist
Henkel Corporation

| SLC Manufacturing USA
Supply Chain Laundry & Home Care
3540 West 1987 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84104

Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Web: www.henkel.com

From: Christine Bodell <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 2:13 PM
To: Alyssa A Trujillo <[e-mail]>
Cc: Roger Akel <[e-mail]>; Andrew Riddick <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXT] Re: Henkel Corporation Notification_DAQE-AN104630031-23

This message is from an EXTERNAL SENDER – be CAUTIOUS, particularly with links and attachments
Good Afternoon Alyssa,

Thank you for taking my phone call this morning.

I had some time to review the Reduction in Air Pollutants submission.

Do you have time for a phone call tomorrow, any time after 11?

Thanks,
Christine

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:46 AM Alyssa A Trujillo <[e-mail]> wrote:
Good Morning,

Attached please find the Notification in Reduction of an Air Pollutant for Henkel Corporation, DAQE-AN104630031-23. A copy of
this notification was also submitted through the online portal. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Thank you,

Alyssa Trujillo
Sr. Safety, Health, & Environmental Specialist
Henkel Corporation

| SLC Manufacturing USA
Supply Chain Laundry & Home Care
3540 West 1987 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84104

Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Web: www.henkel.com

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, please do not use its contents for any purpose, advise the sender immediately
by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining any copy.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not use its contents for any purpose, advise the sender immediately by
reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining any copy.
2 attachments
RE: [EXT] Re: Henkel Corporation Notification_DAQE-AN104630031-23.eml
30K
Henkel SLC Notice of Intent - Revision 2 Oct-14-22A sans SDS - Signed.pdf
11492K