DAQ-2025-001249

DAQE-AN105940002-25

{{$d1 }}

Glenn W. Fassmann
Quality Plating Company, Inc.
420 South 500 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84101-2208
[e-mail]

Dear Mr. Fassmann:

Re: Approval Order: Administrative Amendment to Approval Order DAQE-080-97 for a 10-Year
Review and Permit Updates
Project Number: N105940002

The attached Approval Order (AO) is issued pursuant to the Division of Air Quality conducting a 10-year
administrative review of this source and its respective AO. Quality Plating Company, Inc. must comply
with the requirements of this AO, all applicable state requirements (R307), and Federal Standards.

The project engineer for this action is Stockton Antczak, who can be contacted at [phone] or
[e-mail]. Future correspondence on this AO should include the engineer's name as well as the
DAQE number shown on the upper right-hand corner of this letter.

Sincerely,

{{$s }}

Bryce C. Bird
Director

BCB:SA:jg

cc: Salt Lake County Health Department

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX
Governor
DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor

Department of
Environmental Quality

Tim Davis
Interim Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird
Director

March 4, 2025

STATE OF UTAH
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality

{{#s=Sig_es_:signer1:signature}}
{{#d1=date1_es_:signer1:date:format(date, "mmmm d, yyyy")}}
{{#d2=date1_es_:signer1:date:format(date, "mmmm d, yyyy"):align(center)}}

APPROVAL ORDER
DAQE-AN105940002-25
Administrative Amendment to Approval Order DAQE-080-97
for a 10-Year Review and Permit Updates

Prepared By
Stockton Antczak, Engineer
[phone]
[e-mail]

Issued to
Quality Plating Company, Inc. - Custom Plating Facility

Issued On
{{$d2 }}

Issued By

{{$s }}

Bryce C. Bird
Director
Division of Air Quality

March 4, 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE/SIGNATURE PAGE ....................................................................................................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION ...................................................................................................... 3
CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION ............................................................................... 3
SOURCE INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 3
General Description ................................................................................................................ 3
NSR Classification .................................................................................................................. 3
Source Classification .............................................................................................................. 3
Applicable Federal Standards ................................................................................................. 3
Project Description.................................................................................................................. 4
SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS .................................................................................................... 4
SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS .................................................................................... 4
SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT .............................................................................. 5
SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS ..................................................................................... 7
PERMIT HISTORY ................................................................................................................... 11
ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... 12

DAQE-AN105940002-25
Page 3

GENERAL INFORMATION

CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION

Owner Name Source Name
Quality Plating Company, Inc. Quality Plating Company, Inc. - Custom Plating Facility

Mailing Address Physical Address
420 South 500 West 420 South 500 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84101-2208 Salt Lake City, UT 84101-2208

Source Contact UTM Coordinates
Name: Glenn W. Fassmann 423,769 m Easting
Phone: [phone],512,343 m Northing
Email: [e-mail] Datum NAD83
UTM Zone 12
SIC code 3471 (Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, & Coloring)

SOURCE INFORMATION
General Description
Quality Plating Company, Inc. operates a custom plating facility. The site performs operations including
hard and decorative chromium electroplating, chromium anodizing, and various other plating and coating
operations.

NSR Classification
10-Year Review

Source Classification
Located in Northern Wasatch Front O3 NAA, Salt Lake City UT PM2.5 NAA, Salt Lake County SO2
NAA
Salt Lake County
Airs Source Size: B

Applicable Federal Standards
MACT (Part 63), A: General Provisions
MACT (Part 63), N: National Emission StandardN: National Emission Standards for
Chromium Emissions From Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium
Anodizing Tanks
DAQE-AN105940002-25
Page 4

Project Description
This project is a 10-year review of Approval Order DAQE-080-97 dated January 30, 1997, to update the
permit. Permit language has been revised, and contact information has been updated.

SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS

The emissions listed below are an estimate of the total potential emissions from the source. Some
rounding of emissions is possible.

Criteria Pollutant Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
Carbon Monoxide 0 0.46
Nitrogen Oxides 0 2.25
Particulate Matter - PM10 0 1.17
Particulate Matter - PM2.5 0 1.17
Sulfur Dioxide 0 0.01
Volatile Organic Compounds 0 3.47

Hazardous Air Pollutant Change (lbs/yr) Total (lbs/yr)
Cadmium (CAS #7440439) 0 53
Chromium Compounds (CAS #CMJ500) 0 2
Cyanide (CAS #57125) 0 54
Hydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) (CAS #7647010) 0 55
Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
Total HAPs 0 0.08

SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS

I.1 All definitions, terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in the UAC R307 and 40 CFR. Unless noted otherwise, references cited in these AO conditions refer to those rules. [R307-101] I.2 The limits set forth in this AO shall not be exceeded without prior approval. [R307-401]
I.3 Modifications to the equipment or processes approved by this AO that could affect the emissions covered by this AO must be reviewed and approved. [R307-401-1] I.4 All records referenced in this AO or in other applicable rules, which are required to be kept by the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Director or Director's representative upon request, and the records shall include the two-year period prior to the date of the request. Unless otherwise specified in this AO or in other applicable state and federal rules, records shall be kept for a minimum of two (2) years. [R307-401-8]
DAQE-AN105940002-25
Page 5

I.5 At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners and operators shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any equipment approved under this AO, including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations, review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source. All maintenance performed on equipment authorized by this AO shall be recorded. [R307-401-4] I.6 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-107. General Requirements: Breakdowns. [R307-107]

I.7 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-150 Series. Emission Inventories. [R307-150]

SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT
II.A THE APPROVED EQUIPMENT II.A.1 Quality Plating Company, Inc. Custom Plating Facility
II.A.2 Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks Two (2) tanks controlled by fume suppressants and high-efficiency mist eliminators. Surface Area: 45 square feet Rectifier Capacity: >60 million amperes/year II.A.3 Mist Eliminator Installed on the Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks Manufacturer: Munters* Type: Stainless Steel Baffle Model: T-271 Size: (inches) 26.8x36x6.4 Efficiency: Not rated
II.A.4 Pre-Filter Units Installed on the Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks Manufacturer: FARR* Type: Stainless Steel Model: S4S4 20H 10W Size: (inches) 24x24x2 Efficiency: 87.8% on 5-10 micron particles II.A.5 Secondary Filter Units (1) Installed on the Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks Manufacturer: FARR* Type: Reinforced cotton and synthetic Model: 30/30 Size: (inches) 24x24x2 Efficiency: 99.97% on 0.3 micron particles
DAQE-AN105940002-25
Page 6

II.A.6 Secondary Filter Units (2) Installed on the Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks Manufacturer: FARR* Type: RIGA-FLO Rigid disposable air filter unit Model: RIGA-FLO 200 Size: (inches) 24x24x12 Efficiency: 99% on 1.0 micron particles
II.A.7 Final Filter Unit Installed on the Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks Manufacturer: ECO AIR*
Type: HEPA Model: ALPHA 2000 Size: (inches) 24x24x12
Efficiency: 99.97% on 0.3 micron particles
II.A.8 Decorative Chrome Electroplating Tank One (1) tank controlled by chemical fume suppressant II.A.9 Chrome Anodizing Tank
One (1) tank controlled by chemical fume suppressant

II.A.10 Natural Gas Boiler One (1) natural gas boiler rated at 5175 lbs/hr steam (appx. 5.0 mmbtu/hr)
II.A.11 Natural Gas Heaters Heating Capacity: <5.0 mmbtu/hr

II.A.12 Process Tanks Black Oxide Tanks Phosphating Tanks Chemical Conversion Coating Tanks Cadmium Plating Tanks Zinc Plating Tanks Nickel Plating Sulfuric Acid Anodizing Brass Plating Dow #7 Coating Gold Plating Tanks Copper Plating Tanks Tin Plating Tanks Electroless Nickel Plating Silver Plating Tin-Lead Plating Sulfuric Acid Anodizing Manganese Plating
II.A.13 Support Operations
Various support equipment consisting of wet labs with fume hoods, wastewater pretreatment
plant, forklifts, etc.

DAQE-AN105940002-25
Page 7

SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS
II.B REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS

II.B.1 Site-Wide Requirements
II.B.1.a Unless otherwise specified, the owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any point
or stationary fugitive emission source associated with the installation or control facilities to
exceed 20% opacity. [R307-401]

II.B.1.a.1 The owner/operator shall conduct opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. [R307-401]
II.B.1.b The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from the boiler stack to exceed 10%
opacity. [R307-401]

II.B.1.b.1 The owner/operator shall conduct opacity observations of emissions from the boiler stack in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. [R307-401]
II.B.1.c The owner/operator shall use a chemical fume suppressant containing a wetting agent during
chrome plating and chrome anodizing activities. [R307-401]

II.B.1.c.1 The owner/operator shall not allow the surface tension of the electroplating or anodizing bath contained within the affected source to exceed 40 dynes per centimeter (dynes/cm) (2.8 × 10-3 pound-force per foot (lbf/ft)), as measured by a stalagmometer, or 33 dynes/cm (2.3 × 10-3 lbf/ft), as measured by a tensiometer at any time during tank operation. [40 CFR 63 Subpart N]
II.B.1.c.2 The owner/operator shall conduct monitoring of the surface tension in accordance with 40 CFR
63.343(c)(5). [R307-401]

II.B.1.c.3 The owner/operator shall monitor the surface tension a minimum of once every 40 hours of tank operation. [R307-401]
II.B.1.d The owner/operator shall not exceed the following production limits without prior approval:
6240 hours per rolling 12-month period for hard chrome electroplating tanks. [R307-401]

II.B.1.d.1 The owner/operator shall: A. Determine hours of operation for the chromium electroplating plating tanks by supervisor monitoring and maintaining of an operations log B. Record hours of operation daily C. Use this data to calculate a new rolling 12-month total by the 20th day of each month using data from the previous 12 months D. Keep these records for all periods the plant is in operation. [R307-401]
II.B.1.e The owner/operator shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device for the
continuous measurement of the change in pressure of the gas stream through the mist elimination system. The monitoring device must be certified by the manufacturer. The monitoring device
shall be accurate within plus or minus one half inch of water and must be calibrated on an annual
basis according to the manufacturer's instructions. Continuous recording for the monitoring device is not required. However, daily records of readings shall be maintained. [R307-401]

DAQE-AN105940002-25
Page 8

II.B.1.f The owner/operator shall ensure the operating parameters are maintained within the indicated ranges by complying with the following: A. The pressure drop of the mist elimination system shall not exceed 6.5 inches of water during operation. The minimum pressure drop across the mist elimination system shall not fall below 3.0 inches during times of operation B. The operating parameters shall be monitored with equipment located such that an inspector/operator can safely read the output at any time. The readings shall be accurate to within 0.5 inches water gauge C. All instruments shall be calibrated against a primary standard at least once every 90 days. The primary standard shall be established by the company and shall be submitted to the Director for approval. [R307-401]
II.B.1.g A copy of this AO shall be posted on site. The AO shall be available to the employees who operate the air emission-producing equipment. These employees shall receive proper instruction
as to their responsibilities in operating the equipment according to all of the relevant conditions
listed below. [R307-401]
II.B.2 Stack Testing Requirements
II.B.2.a Emissions to the atmosphere from the indicated emission point(s) shall not exceed the following
rates and concentrations:
Source: Electroplating Stack
Pollutant grains/dscf
(68 degrees F, 29.92 in HG)
Chromium (total) 6.6 X 10^-6 (0.015 mg/dscm)

[R307-401]
II.B.2.b The owner/operator shall conduct any stack testing required by this AO according to the following conditions. [R307-401-8] II.B.2.c Frequency

Testing Test Emission Point Pollutant Status Frequency

Electroplating Stack Chromium * @
* An initial performance test is required to satisfy the NESHAP requirement listed on 40
CFR 63.343(b)(1). The initial test was conducted on July 11, 1997.

@ Test if directed by the Director. Tests may be required if the source is suspected to be in
violation with other conditions of this AO.

[R307-401]

DAQE-AN105940002-25
Page 9

II.B.2.c.1 Notification No less than 30 days prior to conducting a stack test, the owner/operator shall submit a source test protocol to the Director. The source test protocol shall include the items contained in R307-165-3. If directed by the Director, the owner/operator shall attend a pretest conference. [R307-165-3, R307-401-8] II.B.2.c.2 Testing & Test Conditions The owner/operator shall conduct testing according to the approved source test protocol and
according to the test conditions contained in R307-165-4. [R307-165-4, R307-401-8]
II.B.2.c.3 Access The owner/operator shall provide Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) or Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA)-approved access to the test location. [R307-401-8]
II.B.2.c.4 Reporting No later than 60 days after completing a stack test, the owner/operator shall submit a written
report of the results from the stack testing to the Director. The report shall include validated
results and supporting information. [R307-165-5, R307-401-8]
II.B.2.c.5 Possible Rejection of Test Results The Director may reject stack testing results if the test did not follow the approved source test protocol or for a reason specified in R307-165-6. [R307-165-6, R307-401-8]
II.B.2.c.6 Test Methods
When performing stack testing, the owner/operator shall use the appropriate EPA-approved test methods as acceptable to the Director. Acceptable test methods for pollutants are listed below.
[R307-401-8]

II.B.2.c.7 Sample Location 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 1. [R307-401]
II.B.2.c.8 Volumetric Flow Rate 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2. [R307-401]

II.B.2.c.9 Chromium 40 CFR 63, Appendix A, Method 306 or 306A as appropriate. [R307-401]
II.B.2.c.10 Calculations
To determine mass emission rates (lb/hr, etc.), the pollutant concentration as determined by the appropriate methods above shall be multiplied by the volumetric flow rate and any necessary
conversion factors determined by the Director to give the results in the specified units of the
emission limitation. [R307-401]
DAQE-AN105940002-25
Page 10

II.B.2.c.11 New Source Operation For a new source/emission point, the production rate during all compliance testing shall be no less than 90% of the production rate listed in this AO. If the maximum AO allowable production rate has not been achieved at the time of the test, the following procedure shall be followed. A. Testing shall be at no less than 90% of the production rate achieved to date B. If the test is passed, the new maximum allowable production rate shall be 110% of the testing achieved rate. This new allowable maximum production rate shall remain in effect until successfully tested at a higher rate C. The owner/operator shall request a higher production rate when necessary. Testing at no less than 90% of the higher rate shall be conducted. A new maximum production rate (110% of the new rate) will then be allowed if the test is successful. This process may be repeated until the maximum AO production rate is achieved. [R307-401] II.B.2.c.12 Existing Source Operation
For an existing source/emission point, the production rate during all compliance testing shall be
no less than 90% of the maximum production achieved in the previous three (3) years. [R307-401]

II.B.3 Conditions on Boiler
II.B.3.a The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as fuel for the boiler. [R307-401]
II.B.3.a.1 The owner/operator shall: A. Determine natural gas consumption for the boiler and heating system B. Record consumption monthly C. Use this data to calculate a new rolling 12-month total by the 20th day of each month using data from the previous 12-months D. Keep these records for all periods the plant is in operation. [R307-401]
II.B.4 Conditions on VOC Emissions
II.B.4.a The owner/operator shall comply with all applicable requirements of UAC R307-304, Solvent Cleaning. [R307-304, R307-401-8]
II.B.4.b The VOC/HAPs-containing materials and VOC/HAPs-laden rags shall be stored in covered
containers (except when in use). [R307-401-8]

II.B.4.c The owner/operator shall equip the paint spray booth with particulate filters to control particulate emissions. All air exiting the booth shall pass through this control system before being vented to the atmosphere. [R307-401]
DAQE-AN105940002-25
Page 11

II.B.4.d The owner/operator shall not emit more than the following from the on-site paint booths, degreasers, contact cement applicators, etc. as follows: A. 3.47 tons per rolling 12-month period of VOCs. B. 0.08 tons per rolling 12-month period of all HAPs combined. [R307-401] II.B.4.d.1 Compliance with the above limitation shall be determined on a rolling 12-month total. Based on the first day of each month, a new 12-month total shall be calculated using data from the
previous 12 months. [R307-401]
II.B.4.d.2 The owner/operator shall calculate a new 12-month total by the 1st day of each month using data from the previous 12 months. The owner/operator shall use a mass-balance method to calculate emissions from evaporative sources. The owner/operator may use the following equations with applicable units to comply with the mass-balance method: VOCs = [% VOCs by Weight/100] x [Density] x [Volume Consumed] HAP = [% HAP by Weight/100] x [Density] x [Volume Consumed] [R307-401-8]
II.B.4.d.3 The owner/operator shall use a mass-balance method to quantify any amount of VOCs and HAPs reclaimed, such as those contained in materials deposited as solid or hazardous waste. The
owner/operator shall subtract the amount of VOCs and HAPs reclaimed from the quantities
calculated above to provide the monthly total emissions of VOCs and HAPs. [R307-401-8]
II.B.4.d.4 Records of consumption of VOCs and HAPs shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. The owner/operator shall keep records each month of the following: A. The name (as per SDS) of the VOC- and HAP-emitting material B. The maximum percent by weight of VOCs and each HAP in each material used C. The weight and use location (name of paint booth or plant facility) of the VOC potential and HAP potential of each material used, in pounds per gallon D. The total amount of VOCs and the total amount of all HAPs combined emitted from all materials. [R307-401-8]
PERMIT HISTORY

This Approval Order shall supersede (if a modification) or will be based on the following documents: Supersedes AO DAQE-080-97 dated January 30, 1997

DAQE-AN105940002-25
Page 12

ACRONYMS

The following lists commonly used acronyms and associated translations as they apply to this document:

40 CFR Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
AO Approval Order
BACT Best Available Control Technology
CAA Clean Air Act
CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments
CDS Classification Data System (used by Environmental Protection Agency to classify
sources by size/type)
CEM Continuous emissions monitor
CEMS Continuous emissions monitoring system
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CMS Continuous monitoring system
CO Carbon monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 98,
Subpart A, Table A-1
COM Continuous opacity monitor
DAQ/UDAQ Division of Air Quality
DAQE This is a document tracking code for internal Division of Air Quality use
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FDCP Fugitive dust control plan
GHG Greenhouse Gas(es) - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations 52.21 (b)(49)(i)
GWP Global Warming Potential - Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 86.1818-
12(a)
HAP or HAPs Hazardous air pollutant(s)
ITA Intent to Approve
LB/YR Pounds per year MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology MMBTU Million British Thermal Units NAA Nonattainment Area NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants NOI Notice of Intent
NOx Oxides of nitrogen
NSPS New Source Performance Standard
NSR New Source Review
PM10 Particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PM2.5 Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size
PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration
PTE Potential to Emit
R307 Rules Series 307
R307-401 Rules Series 307 - Section 401
SO2 Sulfur dioxide
Title IV Title IV of the Clean Air Act
Title V Title V of the Clean Air Act
TPY Tons per year
UAC Utah Administrative Code
VOC Volatile organic compounds

DAQE-

RN105940002 February 12, 2025 Glenn W. Fassmann
Quality Plating Company 420 S 500 W Salt Lake City, UT 84101
[e-mail] Dear Glenn W. Fassmann,
Re: Engineer Review - 10-Year Review and Permit Updates: Administrative Amendment to Approval Order DAQE-080-97 for a 10-Year Review Project Number: N105940002 The DAQ requests a company representative review and sign the attached Engineer Review (ER). This ER identifies all applicable elements of the New Source Review (NSR) permitting program. Quality Plating Company should complete this review within 10 business days of receipt. Quality Plating Company should contact Stockton Antczak at [phone] if there are questions or concerns with the review of the draft permit conditions. Upon resolution of your concerns, please email Stockton Antczak at [e-mail] the signed cover letter. Upon receipt of the signed cover letter, the DAQ will prepare an Approval Order (AO) for signature by the DAQ Director. If Quality Plating Company does not respond to this letter within 10 business days, the project will move forward without source concurrence. If Quality Plating Company has concerns that cannot be resolved and the project becomes stagnant, the DAQ Director may issue an Order prohibiting construction.
Approval Signature _____________________________________________________________ (Signature & Date)
195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
Department of Environmental Quality
Kimberly D. Shelley Executive Director DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY Bryce C. Bird Director
State of Utah
SPENCER J. COX Governor DEIDRE HENDERSON Lieutenant Governor

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 1
UTAH DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
ENGINEER REVIEW

SOURCE INFORMATION
Project Number N105940002 Owner Name Quality Plating Company Mailing Address 420 S 500 W
Salt Lake City, UT, 84101 Source Name Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility
Source Location 420 S 500 W Salt Lake City, UT 84101-2208
UTM Projection 423,769 m Easting, 4,512,343 m Northing UTM Datum NAD83 UTM Zone UTM Zone 12 SIC Code 3471 (Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, & Coloring) Source Contact Glenn W. Fassmann Phone Number [phone] Email [e-mail] Billing Contact Glenn W. Fassmann Phone Number [phone]
Email [e-mail] Project Engineer Stockton Antczak, Engineer
Phone Number [phone] Email [e-mail]
Notice of Intent (NOI) Submitted October 16, 2024 Date of Accepted Application November 5, 2024

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 2
SOURCE DESCRIPTION General Description
Quality Plating Company operates a custom plating facility. The site performs operations including hard and decorative chromium electroplating, chromium anodizing, and various other plating and coating operations.
NSR Classification: 10 Year Review Source Classification Located in the Northern Wasatch Front O3 NAA, Salt Lake City UT PM2.5 NAA, and Salt Lake County SO2 NAA, Salt Lake County Airs Source Size: B Applicable Federal Standards
MACT (Part 63), A: General Provisions MACT (Part 63), N: National Emission Standard N: National Emission Standards for Chromium Emissions From Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium
Anodizing Tanks Project Proposal
Administrative Amendment to Approval Order DAQE-080-97 for a 10-Year Review Project Description This project is a 10-year review of Approval Order DAQE-080-97 dated January 30, 1997 to update the permit. Permit language has been revised and contact information has been updated. EMISSION IMPACT ANALYSIS This is a 10-year review. No changes to equipment or emissions are being made at this time. Therefore, no modeling analysis is required. [Last updated December 18, 2024]

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 3
SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS
The emissions listed below are an estimate of the total potential emissions from the source. Some rounding of emissions is possible.
Criteria Pollutant Change (TPY) Total (TPY) Carbon Monoxide 0 0.46 Nitrogen Oxides 0 2.25
Particulate Matter - PM10 0 1.17
Particulate Matter - PM2.5 0 1.17
Sulfur Dioxide 0 0.01
Volatile Organic Compounds 0 3.47
Hazardous Air Pollutant Change (lbs/yr) Total (lbs/yr) Cadmium (CAS #7440439) 0 53
Chromium Compounds (CAS #CMJ500) 0 2
Cyanide (CAS #57125) 0 54
Hydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) (CAS #7647010) 0 55
Change (TPY) Total (TPY)
Total HAPs 0 0.08 Note: Change in emissions indicates the difference between previous AO and proposed modification.

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 4
Review of BACT for New/Modified Emission Units . BACT review regarding Existing Equipment
This is a 10-year review. No changes to equipment or emissions are being made at this time. Therefore, a BACT analysis is not required. [Last updated December 18, 2024]
SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS

The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the AO. (New or Modified conditions are indicated as “New” in the Outline Label):
I.1 All definitions, terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in the UAC R307 and 40 CFR. Unless noted otherwise, references cited in these AO conditions refer to those rules. [R307-101]

I.2 The limits set forth in this AO shall not be exceeded without prior approval. [R307-401] I.3 Modifications to the equipment or processes approved by this AO that could affect the emissions covered by this AO must be reviewed and approved. [R307-401-1]
I.4 All records referenced in this AO or in other applicable rules, which are required to be kept by
the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Director or Director's representative upon request, and the records shall include the two-year period prior to the date of the request. Unless otherwise specified in this AO or in other applicable state and federal rules, records shall be kept for a minimum of two (2) years. [R307-401-8] I.5 At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners and operators shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any equipment approved under this AO,
including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available
to the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations, review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source. All maintenance performed on equipment authorized by this AO shall be recorded. [R307-
401-4] I.6 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-107. General Requirements: Breakdowns. [R307-107]

I.7 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-150 Series. Emission Inventories. [R307-150]

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 5
SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the
AO. (New or Modified conditions are indicated as “New” in the Outline Label): II.A THE APPROVED EQUIPMENT
II.A.1 Quality Plating Company Custom Plating Facility
II.A.2 Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks Two (2) tanks controlled by fume suppressants and high efficiency mist eliminators. Surface Area: 45 square feet Rectifier Capacity: >60 million amperes/year II.A.3 Mist Eliminator Installed on the Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks
Manufacturer: Munters* Type: Stainless Steel Baffle Model: T-271 Size: (inches) 26.8x36x6.4 Efficiency: Not rated
II.A.4 Pre-Filter Units
Installed on the Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks Manufacturer: FARR* Type: Stainless Steel
Model: S4S4 20H 10W Size: (inches) 24x24x2 Efficiency: 87.8% on 5-10 micron particles
II.A.5 Secondary Filter Units (1) Installed on the Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks Manufacturer: FARR*
Type: Reinforced cotton and synthetic Model: 30/30 Size: (inches) 24x24x2 Efficiency: 99.97% on 0.3 micron particles II.A.6 Secondary Filter Units (2) Installed on the Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks
Manufacturer: FARR* Type: RIGA-FLO Rigid disposable air filter unit Model: RIGA-FLO 200
Size: (inches) 24x24x12 Efficiency: 99% on 1.0 micron particles

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 6
II.A.7 Final Filter Unit Installed on the Hard Chromium Electroplating Tanks Manufacturer: ECO AIR*
Type: HEPA Model: ALPHA 2000 Size: (inches) 24x24x12
Efficiency: 99.97% on 0.3 micron particles II.A.8 Decorative Chrome Electroplating Tank One (1) tank controlled by chemical fume suppressant
II.A.9 Chrome Anodizing Tank One (1) tank controlled by chemical fume suppressant. II.A.10 Natural Gas Boiler One (1) natural gas boiler rated at 5175 lbs/hr steam (appx. 5.0 mmbtu/hr)

II.A.11 Natural Gas Heaters Heating Capacity: <5.0 mmbtu/hr II.A.12 Process Tanks Black Oxide Tanks Phosphating Tanks Chemical Conversion Coating Tanks Cadmium Plating Tanks Zinc Plating Tanks Nickel Plating Sulfuric Acid Anodizing Brass Plating Dow #7 Coating Gold Plating Tanks Copper Plating Tanks Tin Plating Tanks
Electroless Nickel Plating Silver Plating Tin-Lead Plating
Sulfuric Acid Anodizing Manganese Plating
II.A.13 Support Operations
Various support equipment consisting of wet labs with fume hoods, waste water pretreatment plant, forklifts, etc.

SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS
The intent is to issue an air quality AO authorizing the project with the following recommended conditions and that failure to comply with any of the conditions may constitute a violation of the AO. (New or Modified conditions are indicated as “New” in the Outline Label):

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 7
II.B REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS
II.B.1 Conditions on Permitted Source
II.B.1.a Unless otherwise specified, the owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any point or stationary fugitive emission source associated with the installation or control facilities to exceed 20% opacity. [R307-401] II.B.1.a.1 The owner/operator shall conduct opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. [R307-401]

II.B.1.b The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from the boiler stack to exceed 10% opacity. [R307-401] II.B.1.b.1 The owner/operator shall conduct opacity observations of emissions from the boiler stack in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. [R307-401]
II.B.1.c NEW The owner/operator shall use a chemical fume suppressant containing a wetting agent during chrome plating and chrome anodizing activities. [R307-401]
II.B.1.c.1 NEW The owner/operator shall not allow the surface tension of the electroplating or anodizing bath contained within the affected source to exceed 40 dynes per centimeter (dynes/cm) (2.8 × 10-3 pound-force per foot (lbf/ft)), as measured by a stalagmometer, or 33 dynes/cm (2.3 × 10-3 lbf/ft), as measured by a tensiometer at any time during tank operation. [40 CFR 63 Subpart
N] II.B.1.c.2 The owner/operator shall conduct monitoring of the surface tension in accordance with 40 CFR 63.343(c)(5). [R307-401]
II.B.1.c.3 The owner/operator shall monitor the surface tension a minimum of once every 40 hours of tank operation. [R307-401] II.B.1.d The owner/operator shall not exceed the following production limits without prior approval: 6240 hours per rolling 12-month period for hard chrome electroplating tanks. [R307-401]

II.B.1.d.1 NEW The owner/operator shall:
A. Determine hours of operation for the chromium electroplating plating tanks by
supervisor monitoring and maintaining of an operations log
B. Record hours of operation daily
C. Use this data to calculate a new rolling 12-month total by the 20th day of each month
using data from the previous 12 months D. Keep these records for all periods the plant is in operation. [R307-401]

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 8
II.B.1.e The owner/operator shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device for the continuous measurement of the change in pressure of the gas stream through the mist elimination system. The monitoring device must be certified by the manufacturer. The
monitoring device shall be accurate within plus or minus one half inch of water and must be calibrated on an annual basis according to the manufacturer's instructions. Continuous recording for the monitoring device is not required. However, daily records of readings shall
be maintained. [R307-401] II.B.1.f The owner/operator shall ensure the operating parameters are maintained within the indicated ranges by complying with the following: A. The pressure drop of the mist elimination system shall not exceed 6.5 inches of water
during operation. The minimum pressure drop across the mist elimination system shall
not fall below 3.0 during times of operation. B. The operating parameters shall be monitored with equipment located such that an
inspector/operator can safely read the output at any time. The readings shall be
accurate to within 0.5" water gauge.
C. All instruments shall be calibrated against a primary standard at least once every
90 days. The primary standard shall be established by the company and shall be
submitted to the Director for approval. [R307-401] II.B.1.g A copy of this AO shall be posted on site. The AO shall be available to the employees who operate the air emission producing equipment. These employees shall receive proper instruction as to their responsibilities in operating the equipment according to all of the relevant conditions listed below. [R307-401]
II.B.2 Stack Testing Requirements
II.B.2.a Emissions to the atmosphere from the indicated emission point(s) shall not exceed the following rates and concentrations:
Source: Electroplating Stack
Pollutant grains/dscf
(68 degrees F, 29.92 in HG)
Chromium (total) 6.6 X 10^-6 (0.015 mg/dscm). [R307-401]
II.B.2.b The owner/operator shall conduct any stack testing required by this AO according to the following conditions. [R307-401-8]

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 9
II.B.2.c Frequency
Testing Test
Emission Point Pollutant Status Frequency Electroplating Stack Chromium * @
* An initial performance test is required to satisfy the NESHAP requirement listed on 40 CFR 63.343(b)(1). The initial test was conducted on July 11, 1997. @ Test if directed by the Director. Tests may be required if the source is suspected to be in violation with other conditions of this AO. [R307-401] II.B.2.c.1 NEW Notification No less than 30 days prior to conducting a stack test, the owner/operator shall submit a source test protocol to the Director. The source test protocol shall include the items contained in
R307-165-3. If directed by the Director, the owner/operator shall attend a pretest conference. [R307-165-3, R307-401-8]
II.B.2.c.2
NEW
Testing & Test Conditions
The owner/operator shall conduct testing according to the approved source test protocol and according to the test conditions contained in R307-165-4. [R307-165-4, R307-401-8]
II.B.2.c.3 NEW Access The owner/operator shall provide Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)- or Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA)-approved access to the test location. [R307-401-8]

II.B.2.c.4 NEW Reporting No later than 60 days after completing a stack test, the owner/operator shall submit a written report of the results from the stack testing to the Director. The report shall include validated results and supporting information. [R307-165-5, R307-401-8] II.B.2.c.5 NEW Possible Rejection of Test Results The Director may reject stack testing results if the test did not follow the approved source test protocol or for a reason specified in R307-165-6. [R307-165-6, R307-401-8]

II.B.2.c.6 NEW Test Methods When performing stack testing, the owner/operator shall use the appropriate EPA-approved test methods as acceptable to the Director. Acceptable test methods for pollutants are listed
below. [R307-401-8] II.B.2.c.7 Sample Location 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 1. [R307-401] II.B.2.c.8 Volumetric Flow Rate 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2. [R307-401]

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 10
II.B.2.c.9 Chromium
40 CFR 63, Appendix A, Method 306 or 306A as appropriate. [R307-401]

II.B.2.c.10 Calculations
To determine mass emission rates (lb/hr, etc.) the pollutant concentration as determined by the appropriate methods above shall be multiplied by the volumetric flow rate and any necessary conversion factors determined by the Director to give the results in the specified units of the emission limitation. [R307-401]
II.B.2.c.11 New Source Operation For a new source/emission pint, the production rate during all compliance testing shall be no less than 90% of the production rate listed in this AO. If the maximum AO allowable production rate has not been achieved at the time of the test, the following procedure shall be
followed.
A. Testing shall be at no less than 90% of the production rate achieved to date.
B. If the test is passed, the new maximum allowable production rate shall be 110% of the
testing achieved rate. This new allowable maximum production rate shall remain in effect until successfully tested at a higher rate. C. The owner/operator shall request a higher production rate when necessary. Testing at no less than 90% of the higher rate shall be conducted. A new maximum production rate (110%
of the new rate) will then be allowed if the test is successful. This process may be repeated until the maximum AO production rate is achieved. [R307-401]
II.B.2.c.12 Existing Source Operation For an existing source/emission point, the production rate during all compliance testing shall be no less than 90% of the maximum production achieved in the previous three (3) years.
[R307-401] II.B.3 Conditions on Boiler
II.B.3.a The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as fuel for the boiler. [R307-401] II.B.3.a.1

The owner/operator shall: A. Determine natural gas consumption for the boiler and heating system B. Record consumption monthly
C. Use this data to calculate a new rolling 12-month total by the 20th day of each month
using data from the previous 12-months. D. Keep these records for all periods the plant is in operation. [R307-401]

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 11
II.B.4 Conditions on VOC Emissions
II.B.4.a NEW The owner/operator shall comply with all applicable requirements of UAC R307-304, Solvent Cleaning. [R307-304, R307-401-8] II.B.4.b The VOC/HAPs-containing materials and VOC/HAPs-laden rags shall be stored in covered containers (except when in use). [R307-401-8]

II.B.4.c The owner/operator shall equip the paint spray booth with particulate filters to control particulate emissions. All air exiting the booth shall pass through this control system before being vented to the atmosphere. [R307-401]

II.B.4.d The owner/operator shall not emit more than the following from the on-site paint booths,
degreasers, contact cement applicators, etc. as follows: A. 3.47 tons per rolling 12-month period of VOCs. B. 0.08 tons per rolling 12-month period of all HAPs combined. [R307-401]
II.B.4.d.1 Compliance with the above limitation shall be determined on a rolling 12-month total. Based on the first day of each month a new 12-month total shall be calculated using data from the previous 12 months. [R307-401]
II.B.4.d.2 NEW The owner/operator shall calculate a new 12-month total by the 1st day of each month using data from the previous 12 months. The owner/operator shall use a mass-balance method to
calculate emissions from evaporative sources. The owner/operator may use the following equations with applicable units to comply with the mass-balance method: VOCs = [% VOCs by Weight/100] x [Density] x [Volume Consumed] HAP = [% HAP by Weight/100] x [Density] x [Volume Consumed] [R307-401-8] II.B.4.d.3 NEW The owner/operator shall use a mass-balance method to quantify any amount of VOCs and HAPs reclaimed, such as those contained in materials deposited as solid or hazardous waste.
The owner/operator shall subtract the amount of VOCs and HAPs reclaimed from the quantities calculated above to provide the monthly total emissions of VOCs and HAPs. [R307-401-8]

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 12
II.B.4.d.4 NEW Records of consumption of VOCs and HAPs shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. The owner/operator shall keep records each month of the following: A. The name (as per SDS) of the VOC- and HAP-emitting material B. The maximum percent by weight of VOCs and each HAP in each material used
C. The weight and use location (name of paint booth or plant facility) of the
VOC potential and HAP potential of each material used, in pounds per gallon D. The total amount of VOCs and the total amount of all HAPs combined emitted
from all materials. [R307-401-8]

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 13
PERMIT HISTORY When issued, the approval order shall supersede (if a modification) or will be based on the
following documents: Supersedes DAQE-080-97 dated January 30, 1997
REVIEWER COMMENTS
1. Comment regarding Summary of Changes:
As part of this 10-year review many parts of the previous AO were updated. Some of these changes include updates to formatting, stack testing language, simplifying the equipment list, and adding PM2.5 to and removing TSP from the site emissions. Some noteworthy changes are listed below.
Conditions 1, 3, 5, 6, and 15 were removed as the information in them is listed elsewhere in the
permit and they do not need to be listed as individual conditions. Conditions 16 was removed as the maintenance plan has already been submitted to the DAQ and a new plan is not required as part of this review. Condition 19 was removed because the site emits less than the Title V threshold for HAPs. Conditions 10 previously listed a surface tension value of 45 dynes/cm, but was changed to 40 dynes/cm. This is in line with the limits listed in 40 CFR 63 Subpart N, to which this facility is applicable.
The rest of the original conditions are still included in this review with their original limits, but may have a different format or wording, or may have been split into multiple conditions. [Last updated January 6, 2025] 2. Comment regarding Addition of PM2.5 Emissions: At the time that the current AO was issued, PM2.5 was not being tracked. PM2.5 emissions have been added to this permit using the equation PM2.5 = PM10. [Last updated December 20, 2024] 3. Comment regarding Federal Code Applicability: Because the source operates chromium electroplating and other processes it is subject to 40 CFR 63
Subpart N - National Emission Standards for Chromium Emissions From Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks. [Last updated December 26, 2024]
4. Comment regarding Title V Applicability: Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act (Title V) applies to the following: 1. Any major source 2. Any source subject to a standard, limitation, or other requirement under Section 111 of the Act, Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources; 3. Any source subject to a standard or other requirement under Section 112 of the Act, Hazardous Air Pollutants.
4. Any Title IV affected source.
The source is not a major source, is not subject to Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, and is not a Title

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 14
IV affected source. The site is subject to section 112 of the Clean Air Act and is considered an area source. 63.340(e) of Subpart N exempts area sources from the obligation to obtain a Title V
operating permit. Therefore Title V does not apply to this source. [Last updated January 6, 2025]

Engineer Review N105940002: Quality Plating Co., Inc. - Custom Plating Facility February 12, 2025 Page 15
ACRONYMS The following lists commonly used acronyms and associated translations as they apply to this document:
40 CFR Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations AO Approval Order BACT Best Available Control Technology
CAA Clean Air Act CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments CDS Classification Data System (used by EPA to classify sources by size/type) CEM Continuous emissions monitor CEMS Continuous emissions monitoring system CFR Code of Federal Regulations CMS Continuous monitoring system CO Carbon monoxide CO2 Carbon Dioxide CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent - 40 CFR Part 98, Subpart A, Table A-1 COM Continuous opacity monitor
DAQ/UDAQ Division of Air Quality DAQE This is a document tracking code for internal UDAQ use EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FDCP Fugitive dust control plan GHG Greenhouse Gas(es) - 40 CFR 52.21 (b)(49)(i) GWP Global Warming Potential - 40 CFR Part 86.1818-12(a)
HAP or HAPs Hazardous air pollutant(s) ITA Intent to Approve LB/HR Pounds per hour
LB/YR Pounds per year MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology MMBTU Million British Thermal Units
NAA Nonattainment Area NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants NOI Notice of Intent NOx Oxides of nitrogen NSPS New Source Performance Standard NSR New Source Review PM10 Particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PM2.5 Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration PTE Potential to Emit
R307 Rules Series 307 R307-401 Rules Series 307 - Section 401 SO2 Sulfur dioxide
Title IV Title IV of the Clean Air Act Title V Title V of the Clean Air Act TPY Tons per year
UAC Utah Administrative Code VOC Volatile organic compounds
Stockton Antczak <[e-mail]>
10-Year Review of Air Quality Permit DAQE-080-97
10 messages
Stockton Antczak <[e-mail]>Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 10:39 AM
To: [e-mail]
Quality Plating Company,
The Utah Division of Air Quality is conducting a 10-year review of the Custom Plating Facility and the Approval Order (AO)
associated with it DAQE-080-97. This review will update the formatting and language of this AO to make it similar to
modern permits. The permit requirements will stay the same. However, if state or federal laws have changed since your
AO was issued, the requirements in your AO may be subject to change. Your or your company will NOT be charged
anything for this project. I just have a couple questions.
Are you still the best person to contact regarding the Approval Order?
Are these the correct addresses for this site?
Physical:
420 S 500 W Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Mailing:
Same as physical address
Is this the correct name of this site?
Quality Plating Company - Custom Plating Facility
If you have any questions for me as the engineer over this project, please reach out.
Best Regards,
Stockton Antczak
--
Stockton J. Antczak | Permitting Engineer | Major New Source Review
385-306-6724 (cell)
195 North 1950 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Stockton Antczak <[e-mail]>Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 1:26 PM
To: [e-mail]
Quality Plating Company,
I wanted to follow up to see if you had seen my previous email. If this is not the correct person to contact, please let me
know who I should contact instead.
Thanks
Stockton Antczak
[Quoted text hidden]
2/26/25, 1:14 PM State of Utah Mail - 10-Year Review of Air Quality Permit DAQE-080-97
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=15596fcb07&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-1783399607381378788&simpl=msg-a:r430183977340146…1/4
Glenn Fassmann <[e-mail]>Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 2:07 PM
To: Stockton Antczak <[e-mail]>

Hello Stockton,

Yes, I am the correct person to contact.

Please let me know what questions I can answer. I know our permit is very old. I dealt with it from the
beginning.

Thank You,

Glenn Fassmann
QP Quality Plating Co., Inc.
801-355-7424 X 203
[Quoted text hidden]
Stockton Antczak <[e-mail]>Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 2:24 PM
To: Glenn Fassmann <[e-mail]>
Mr Fassmann,
The following is from my original email. If you could answer the two bolded questions I would appreciate it.
The Utah Division of Air Quality is conducting a 10-year review of the Custom Plating Facility and the Approval Order (AO)
associated with it DAQE-080-97. This review will update the formatting and language of this AO to make it similar to
modern permits. The permit requirements will stay the same. However, if state or federal laws have changed since your
AO was issued, the requirements in your AO may be subject to change. Your or your company will NOT be charged
anything for this project. I just have a couple questions.
Are these the correct addresses for this site?
Physical:
420 S 500 W Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Mailing:
Same as physical address
Is this the correct name of this site?
Quality Plating Company - Custom Plating Facility
If you have any questions for me as the engineer over this project, please reach out.
[Quoted text hidden]
Glenn Fassmann <[e-mail]>Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 2:46 PM
To: Stockton Antczak <[e-mail]>
2/26/25, 1:14 PM State of Utah Mail - 10-Year Review of Air Quality Permit DAQE-080-97
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=15596fcb07&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-1783399607381378788&simpl=msg-a:r430183977340146…2/4

Hello Stockton,

The address is correct for location and mailing.

The official legal company name is actually Quality Plating Co., Inc. but what you have for the name of the
site should work fine.
[Quoted text hidden]
Stockton Antczak <[e-mail]>Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 4:30 PM
To: Glenn Fassmann <[e-mail]>
Glenn,
Attached is my draft of the 10-year review. Please look it over and let me know if you have any questions or concerns
about the updates.
Thanks,
Stockton
[Quoted text hidden]
RN105940002.rtf
1581K
Stockton Antczak <[e-mail]>Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 4:34 PM
To: Glenn Fassmann <[e-mail]>
Glenn,
I just wanted to follow up to see if you had had a chance to look over the 10-year review I sent you. Let me know if you
have any questions.
Thanks,
Stockton
[Quoted text hidden]
Glenn Fassmann <[e-mail]>Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 5:11 PM
To: Stockton Antczak <[e-mail]>

Hello Stockton,
I’m sorry, I just read it. I have some questions. When is a good time to talk tomorrow? I just want to make
certain I understand everything.
[Quoted text hidden]
2/26/25, 1:14 PM State of Utah Mail - 10-Year Review of Air Quality Permit DAQE-080-97
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=15596fcb07&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-1783399607381378788&simpl=msg-a:r430183977340146…3/4
Stockton Antczak <[e-mail]>Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 8:54 AM
To: Glenn Fassmann <[e-mail]>
Im available today between 10am and noon, and then from 1pm to 5pm. Let me know what works for you. We can talk on
the phone or video call, whichever you prefer.
[Quoted text hidden]
Glenn Fassmann <[e-mail]>Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:03 PM
To: Stockton Antczak <[e-mail]>
[Quoted text hidden]
scan_20250225110642.pdf
231K
2/26/25, 1:14 PM State of Utah Mail - 10-Year Review of Air Quality Permit DAQE-080-97
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=15596fcb07&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-1783399607381378788&simpl=msg-a:r430183977340146…4/4