DAQ-2025-001947

1

DAQC-350-25
Site ID 10335 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING COMPANY

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: April 8, 2025

SUBJECT: Location: 474 West 900 North, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
Contact: Rheannon Schaefer – 801-367-8102
Tester: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Sources: Gasoline Hydrotreater (GHT) F701
FRS ID #: UT0000004903500004
AO# DAQE-AN0103350075-18 dated January 11, 2018
Subject: Review of Pretest Protocol dated March 31, 2025

On March 31, 2025, the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a protocol for testing of the Tesoro
Refining and Marketing Company’s GHT F701 located in Salt Lake City, Utah. Testing will be
performed on April 29, 2025, to determine compliance with the emission limits found in AO Condition
II.B.7.a

PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:

1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses: OK
2. RM 3A used to determine O2 and CO2 concentrations: OK
3. RM 7E used to determine NOx emissions: OK

DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted.

CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: Send protocol review and test date confirmation notice.

ATTACHMENTS: Stack testing protocol

6 3
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL OIJAUTY
l'lAR 3 1 2025
DMSTON OF AIR Ou Unt
March 31,2025
Mr. Paul Morris
Division of Air Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake city, uT 84114 Hand Delivered
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company's
Salt Lake City Refinery
GHT F-701 Nitrogen Oxides Emissions Test Protocol
Dear Mr. Morris:
Enclosed please find the protocol for the Gasoline Hydrotreater (GHT) F-701 Furnace
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Emissions Performance Test tentatively scheduled to be
conducted on April 29,2025.
The purpose of the testing program is to determine the NOx emissions rate of the
GHT F-701 furnace while the unit is running at maximum rate.
Although this is not an annual environmental requirement, the operations group made
this decision at the last minute. We recognize that it falls just within our 30-day
protocol window and have generated the test plan as quickly as possible.
Please contact Rheannon Schaefer at [phone] ifyou have any questions.
Sincerely,
MU-"4pr
Rheannon Schaefer U
Environmental Specialist
Attachment
DEPANTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL OUATITY
MAR 3 1 2325
DrvtsroN tr ArR Otrurv
flawl 0elivcreA '
r_=Alta
i [:.Ol--]NICA C;ROLI I)
Site Specific Test Plan
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake ciry, uT 84103
Source to be Tested: GHT - F70l
Proposed Test Date: April 29,2025
Project No. AST -2025-1868
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley Ciry, UT 84120
AI Fla
T! C iIIIICAL GROUT-Site Specific Test Plan
Test Program Summary
I
Resulatory Information
'' :':..\ ;lO : i'.i
Peymit No..
Source Information
DAQE-AN103350075-18
Source Name
Gasoline Hydrotreater (GHT)
Contact Information
Source ID
F70l
Target Parameter
NOx
Test Location
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Facility Contact
Rheannon Schaefer
Rschaefer@marathonpetro leum. com
(801) 367-8r02
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, Lm 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Alan Jensen
alan [e-mail]
[phone]
(subject to change)
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
[e-mail]
(8t2) 4s2-478s
Test Plarfiepod Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
delaine. spangler@alliancetg. com
AST-2025- I 868 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page i
Site Spectfc Test Plan
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.0 Summary of Test Program .................2-l
2.1 Process/Confrol System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded...... ...........2-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method I - Sample Point Determination.......... ....... 3-1
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide........ ............ 3-1
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides ............ 3-1
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 -Mass Emission Factors ........................3-2
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification. ........................3-2
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A and 7E................................3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-l: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedu1e................... ......2-l
LIST OF APPENDICES
AppendixA MethodlData
Appendix B Example Field Data Sheets
AST-2025- I 868 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page ii
pul6rpe
Gno[i:-'Site Specific Test Plan
Introduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) to conduct
compliance testing at the Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company (Tesoro) Salt Lake City, Utah refinery. Portions
of the facility are subject to provisions of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality
(UDAQ) Permit No. DAQE-AN103350075-18. Testing will be conducted to determine the emission rate of
nihogen oxides (NOx) from the Gasoline Hydrotreater (GHT) F70l fumace stack.
This site-specific test plan (SSTP) has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of the
UDAQ permit.
1.1 Facility Descriptions
The Gasoline Hydrotreating Unit (GHT) F-701 furnace is fired using plant gas to preheat gasoline range
material. The unit produces low sulfur gasoline to meet Tier III standards.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-1: Project Team
1.3 Safety Requirements
Testing personnel will undergo site-specific safety taining for all applicable areas upon arrival at the site. Alliance
personnel will have current OSHA or MSHA safety taining and be equipped with hard hats, safety glasses with side
shields, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fue resistant clothing, and fall protection (including shock
corded lanyards and full-body hamesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves in a manner consistent wittr
Client and Alliance's safety policies.
A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader.
MPC Personnel Rheannon Schaefer
Regulatory Agency UDAQ
Alliance Personnel Alan Jensen
other field personnel assigned at time of testing event
AST-2025- l 868 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page l-l
AI Site Specific Test Plan
Summary ofTest Programs
2.0 Summary of Test Program
All testing will be performed in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A,
78, and 19. Table 2-1 presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program. The following is
a sunmary of the test objectives.
o Emissions testing will be conducted on the exhaust of the F-701 furnace stack.
o Each of the three (3) test runs will be I hour in duration.
2.1 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded
Plant personnel will collect operational and parametric data at least once every 15 minutes during the testing. The
following list identifies the measurements, observations and records that will be collected during the testing
program:
. Fuel Gas Analysis - one per test program
o Fuel Firing Rate
2.2 Proposed Test Schedule
Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program.
Table 2-1: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule
2.3 Test Report
The final test report must be submitted within 60 days of the completion of the performance test and will include the
following information.
o Introduction -Bief discussion of project scope of work and activities.
. Results and Discussion - A summary of test results and process/control system operational data with
comparison to regulatory requirements or vendor guarantees along with a description of process conditions
and/or testing deviations that may have affected the testing results.
o Methodologt - A description of the sampling and analytical methodologies.
. Sample Calculations - Example calculations for each target parameter.
o Field Data - Copies of actual handwritten or electronic field data sheets.
o Quality Control Data - Copies of all instrument calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates.
c Process Operating/Control System Data - Process operating and control system data (as provided by
Tesoro) to support the test results.
Fla
Testing Locetion Perameter US EPA Method No. of Runs Run Duration EsL Onsite
Time
DAY I -ApriI29,2025
Equipment Setup & Pretest QA/QC Checks
8hr
GHT
Oz/COz 3A
J 60 minNOx7E
Mass Emission
Factors l9
AST-2025- l 868 Tesoro - Satt Lake City, UT Pagc 2-l
put6rpe
Sile Specific Test Plan
Testing Methodologt
3.0 Testing Methodology
This section provides a description of the sampling and analyical procedures for each test method that will be
employed during the test progrirm. All equipment, procedures and quality assurance measures necessary for the
completion of the test program meet or exceed the specifications of each relevant test method. The emission testing
program will be conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodology
All stack diameters, depths, widths, upstream and downstream disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be
measured on site with an EPA Method I verification measurement provided by the Field Team Leader. These
measurements will be included in the test report.
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 1 - Sample Point Determination
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points will be selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances will be equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure l-2 (measuring velocity alone) in U.S.
EPA Reference Test Method l.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (Oz) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3A. Data will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist
of a stainless steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identif,red gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sample line is used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section
3.6.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides
The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 78. Data
will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist of a stainless steel
probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system
will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line is
used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a
heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measlues are described in Section 3.6.
Peremeter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remlrks
Sample Point Determination I
Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide 3A lnstrumental Analysis
Nitrogen Oxides 7E Instrumental Analysis
Mass Emission Factors r9 Fuel Factors/Fleat lnputs
Gas Dilution System Certification 205
AST-2025- l 868 Tesoro Salt Lake Ciry, UT Page 3-l
pd/IATEEI
Site SpeciJlc Test Plan
Testing Methodologt.,. il t) i--t i:
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 -Mass Emission Factors
A Fuel sample will be procured and sent to the identified analytical laboratory. The laboratory analysis will be used
to calculate a wet or dry O, based F-Factor in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19. The mass
emission factor (lb/Ir,IMBtu) will be calculated using the pollutant concenfation, 02 concentration and the calculated
F-Factor.
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Ges Dilution System Certilicetion
A calibration gas dilution system field check will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method
205. An initial three (3) point calibration will be conducted, using individual Protocol I gases, on the analyzer used
to complete the dilution system field check. Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates will be utilized to force
the dilution system to perform two dilutions on each mass flow conffoller. The diluted calibration gases will be sent
directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response will be recorded in an electronic field data sheet. A mid-level
supply gas, with a cylinder concentration within lDYo of one of the gas divider settings described above, will be
introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electonic field data sheet. The
cylinder concentration and the analyzer response must agree within 2o/o. T\ese steps will be repeated three (3)
times. The average analyzer response must agree within 2Yo of the predicted gas concentration. No single injection
shall differ more than ZYo from the average instrument response for that dilution.
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A and 7E
Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol I (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates
will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report.
Low Level gas will be intoduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will be recorded. This process will be
repeated for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration gases will be
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. The Calibration Error for each gas must be within 2.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/Yo absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppm/% (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration will be recorded. The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value, and this value
will be recorded. Next, Low-Level gas will be introduced at the probe and the time required for the malyzer reading
to decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppm/% (whichever was less restrictive) will be recorded. If the Low-
Level gas is zero gas, the acceptable response must be 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration or 0.5 ppm/%
(whichever was less restrictive). The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value, and this value
will be recorded. The measurement system response time and initial system bias will be determined from these data.
The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response is stable, the value will be recorded. Next, Low-Level gas will be introduced at the probe, and the
atalyzer value will be recorded once it reaches a stable response. The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0
percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference or the data is invalidated, and the Calibration
Error Test and System Bias must be repeated.
AST-2025- I 868 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page3-2
pul6nrcE)
ciitJt{1.\i (l fl tl ., r;Site Specific Test Plan
Testing Methodologl
The Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias must be within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/%
absolute difference or the Calibration Error Test and System Bias must be repeated.
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check will be conducted prior to initiating testing.
The pollutant concenffations will be measured at twelve traverse points (as described in Method l) or three points
(16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each haverse point will be sampled for a minimum of twice
the system response time.
If the pollutant concentrations at each traverse point do not differ more than SYo or 0.5 ppml0.3% (whichever is less
restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling will be conducted during the test runs.
If the pollutant concentration does not meet these specifications but differs less than l0o/o or I .0 ppml0.5% from the
average concentration, then three (3) point sampling will be conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - 16.'7,
50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter - 0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters
from the stack wall). If the pollutant concentration differs by more than l0% or 1.0 ppm/0.5o/ofrom the average
concentration, then sampling will be conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse points. Copies of stratification
check data will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report.
An NOu - NO converter check will be performed on the analyzer prior to initiating testing or at the completion of
testing. An approximately 50 ppm nitrogen dioxide cylinder gas will be introduced directly to the NOx analyzer and
the instrument response will be recorded in an electonic data sheet. The instrument response must be within +/- l0
percent of the cylinder concentration.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup will be used to record the instrument response in one (1) minute
averages. The data will be continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At
the completion of testing, the data will also be saved to the Alliance server. All data will be reviewed by the Field
Team Leader before leaving *re facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data will be
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review will be performed by the Project Manager.
AST-2025- I 868 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 3-3
AIrIlll la_-.r Site Specific Test Plan
Ouality Assuranc e Pr o gr am
4.0 Quality Assurance Progrem
Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Management Plan to ensure the
continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and
procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme.
Adherence to prescribed procedures is quite often the most applicable QC check.
4.1 Equipment
Field test equipment is assigned a unique, permanent identification number. Prior to mobilizing for the test
program, equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipment problems prior to arriving on site. This
minimizes lost time on the job site due to equipment failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is
unavoidable despite the most rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures. Therefore, replacements for critical
equipment or components are brought to the job site. Equipment retuming from the field is inspected before it is
returned to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and
recalibrated where necessary.
Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. The
calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA-600/R-94/038c, September 1994) are utilized.
When these methods are inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recognized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked
for completeness and accuracy. Copies of calibration forms are included in the report.
The following sections elaborate on the calibration procedures followed by Alliance for these items of equipment.
o Dry Gas Meter and Orifice. A full meter calibration using critical orifices as the calibration standard is
conducted at least semi-annually, more frequently if required. The meter calibration procedure determines
the meter correction factor (Y) and the meter's orifice pressure differential (AH@). Alliance uses approved
Alternative Method 009 as a post-test calibration check to ensure that the correction factor has not changed
more than 5% since the last full meter calibration. This check is performed after each test series.
r Pitot Tubes and Manometers. Type-S pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria required by U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.84 unless a specific coefficient has been
determined from a wind tunnel calibration. If a specific coeffrcient from a wind tunnel calibration has been
obtained that coeffrcient will be used in lieu of 0.84. Standard pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria
required by U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.99. Any pitot tubes not
meeting the appropriate geometric criteria are discarded and replaced. Manometers are verified to be level
and zeroed prior to each test run and do not require further calibration.
o Temoerature Measurins Devices. All thermocouple sensors mounted in Dry Gas Meter Consoles are
calibrated semi-annually with a MST-traceable thermocouple calibrator (temperature simulator) and
verified during field use using a second NlST-raceable meter. NlST-traceable thermocouple calibrators
are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory.
o Nozzles. Nozzles are measured three (3) times prior to initiating sampling with a caliper. The maximum
difference between any two (2) dimensions is 0.004 in.
o Digital Calipers. Calipers are calibrated annually by Alliance by using gage blocks that are calibrated
annually by an outside laboratory.
7la
AST-2025-l 868 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 4- I
4.2
TECtll.l uct,lF Site SpeciJic Test Plan
Oua liv As sur anc e Pro gr amH'I
Barometer. The barometric pressure is obtained from a nationally recognized agency or a calibrated
barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field trip against a mercury barometer. The
barometer is acceptable if the values agree within + 2 percent absolute. Barometers not meeting this
requirement are adjusted or taken out ofservice.
Balances and Weights. Balances are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory. A functional check is
conducted on the balance each day it is use in the field using a calibration weight. Weights are re-certified
every two (2) years by an outside laboratory or internally. If conducted internally, they are weighed on a
NIST traceable balance. If the weight does not meet the expected criteria, they are replaced.
Other Equipment. A mass flow controller calibration is conducted on each Environics system annually
following the procedures in the Manufacturer's Operation manual. A methane/ethane penetration factor
check is conducted on the total hydrocarbon analyzers equipped with non-methane cutters every six (6)
months following the procedures in 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ. Other equipment such as probes, umbilical
lines, cold boxes, etc. are routinely maintained and inspected to ensure that they are in good working order.
They are repaired or replaced as needed.
Field Sampling
Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test
method(s). General QC measures for the test program include:
. Cleaned glassware and sample tain components will be sealed until assembly.
o Sample tains will be leak checked before and after each test run.
o Appropriate probe, filter and impinger temperatures will be maintained.
. The sampling port will be sealed to prevent air from leaking from the pod.
. Dry gas meter, AP, AH, temperahue and pump vacuum data will be recorded during each sample point.
o An isokinetic sampling rate of 90-l l0% will be maintained, as applicable.
. All raw data will be maintained in organized manner.
. All raw data will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability.
AST-2025- r 868 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 4-2
-'Al6rrcesOr traF IL:s'\.-,
Ifirdor Tmrc R.ftrhr - Srlt hk. CItv R.filcry
Method I Data
So!rcG GET
Ihct Orlcltrdo!:
Duct Dalgr:
Irlrtrlc. froE Fu W.ll to Ortddc ot Port:
NtPpl. L.ngthl
Dcptl ofDrd:
Vdicd
Circular 'xgu-r*.*-lbln
lo
h96.J0
Crox Sccdonrt A16 ofDuc: 50.79 tt'
No. ofTql Port : 2
Dl.trlcc Ar 15.0 ll
Dlttac. A Dld lrlro.t 6r I J (D!tl bc > 0.5)
D1.4.tr.. Br 20.0 i
Dttrc. B Doct IXrDCtcn: 2.5 (E!tt b. > 2)
L
It.
6H-.&CFdl-b.(rdt*c-h-r
, CIRCULARDU
L(rcATION OF STNATIFICATION FOI\TTS
Nufrbet oftruvrsc poldls oil o diuhalet
t
3
1
5
6
1t
9
IO
ll
t2
2 I I S 6 1 t I l0 ll t2
14.6
t5.4
6.7
25.0
?5.0
,:_,
4.4
11.6
29.6
70.4
85.4
,r_,
3.2
10.5
t9.4
32.3
67.',|
t0.6
E9.5
,:t
2.6
8.2
14.6
27.6
14.2
65.E
11.4
t5.,1
91.8
't,.0
2.1
6.7
l l.t
't7.7
25,0
35.6
64.4
75.0
t2.3
tt.2
93.3
919
'l'$crnt ol \ht.k.lMnttlar liom Ihst.k \|dll fi, lrllvet\a lilnl
l.t-tL
Travc*
Poht
/. ol I)lfine uuurca
froo
I)hmd.r rrll outtld. of
I
3
1
5
5
1
t
9
l0
il
t2
16.7
50.0
83.3
16.12
4t.25
80.38
20.12
52.25
t4.3t
Stack Disgrm
A= 15ft-
B=20ft.
Dcpth ofDuct = 96.5 in.
Cro66 ScctioBl Arce lrownst].am
okturbanc!
Upstlarm
lxsturban..
QA Data
Location -- - --
Source --
Project No. -
Parameter 0r - Outlet CO" - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make
Model
SAI
Operatinq Range
Cylinder ID
Znro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
Y
NA
r1
NA
Y
Cylinder Certifed Values
Tnro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
Y
NA
NA
NA
Y
Cylinder Expiretion Date
Znro
Low
Mid
Hiph
NA
Y
NA
NA
NA
Y
Calibration Data
Location: -- - -
Source: --
Project No.: --
Date: --
Parameter Or - Outlet COr - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Exnected Averase Concentretion
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Span
Low Range Gas
Low
Hiph
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (o/o or ppm)
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
0.00
NA
0.00
NA
Resnonse Time (seconds)
Upscale Calibration Ges (Cpj
Instrument Response (7o or ppm)
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA NA NA
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA NA NA
Performance Criteria
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hieh
2.00
NA
2.00
2.00
2.00
NA
2.00
2.00
2.00
NA
2.00
2.00
Znro
Low
Mid
Hish
Stetus
NA NA NA
Bias/Drift Determinations
Locetion:
Source:
ProJect No.:
Peremeter 0r - 0utlet COr - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run I Dete
Span Value
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
#N/A #N/A #N/A
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Soan
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
Run 2 Drte
Span Value
lnstrument Zero Cal Response
lnstrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale Response
fN/A #N/A #N/A
3ias (%)
Jretest Zero
losttest Zero
?retest Span
)nsttesf Snan
)rift (%)
Zero
\rid
Run 3 Date
Span Value
lnstrument Zero Cal Response
lnstrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Response
#N/A #N/A #N/A
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
Emissions Celculations
Locetion -- - --
Source --
ProjectNo. -
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Average
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
Source Data
Source [nad, o/o
Fuel Factor (O2 dry), dscf/I,IMBtu
EL
Fd
Calculated Data - Outlet
Oz Concentration. % dry co,
COz Concentration, % dry Cco,
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Emission Factor, lbA,IMBtu (O2d)
CNo'
EFNoroza
Run 1 - RM Data'
Lmdm: ---
Somc: --
ProJct No.: -
Drtc: -
Or-Ouflct COr-Oqtlct NOr-Oudct
%dry %dty pprvd
V8lid Vdid vdid
Pumctrr
U[orat d Ru Avcr.l. (C-)
Cd G{ Colccrtrrdon (Cyj
ProtdtSFt DZBoX.apom
Potttdt Syttcm Zcro Rdpoile
Avcr{c7rro Rapou (Co)
Pr.t6t Syltcm Cd Rgponlc
P6ttdt S}|tcD Cd RcrDo[r.
AvErgc Cd Rcryolrc (Cf,)
Locetion: -- - --
Project No.: --
NO2 Converter Check - Outlet
Andyzer Make
Analyzer Model
Serial Number
Cylinder ID Number
Cylinder Exp. Date
Cvlinder Concentratlon. Dnm
Pre.Test Date Time
Pre-Test Efficiencv. 7o
Post-Test Date Time
Post-Test Concentration, ppm
Post-Test Elliciencv. 7o
*Required Elficiency is > 90 %.
Location: -- - --
Source: --
Project No.: --
Traverse Point Time NOx
(nnm)
o2
(o/"\
Cor
(o/"\
A-l
1
3
4
5
6
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
B-l
2
3
4
5
6
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
Average
Criteria Met Sinsle Point Sinsle Point Sinele Point
Location:
Project No.:
FUEL FACTOR CALCULATION BASED ON FUEL AI\ALYSIS
COMPONENI MW MOLE%MOLES C MOLESH MOLES O MOLES N MOLES S
HYDROGEI\2.016
HELIUM 4.003
METHANE 16.043
WATEB 18.015
CARBON MONO)flDE 28.010
MTROGEN 28.013
ETI{YLENE 28.054
ETI{ANE 30.070
OXYGE\3 1.999
I{YDROGEN SULFIDE 34.0',16
ARCON 39.948
PROPYLENE 42.081
CARBON DIO)ODE ,t4.010
PROPANE 44.097
BUTYLENES 56 08
ISO.BTTTANE 58 24
N.BUTANE 58.24
PENTENES 70.35
ISO-PENTANE 72.5l
N.PENTANE 72.5l
BENZENE 78.t4
HEXANE 86 78
TOLUENE 92 4l
TIEPTANE 100.205
ET}TYLBENZENE 106.1 68
XYLENE l 06.1 68
TOTAI
WEIGHT (LBS]
WEIGHT%
LEV BTU/SCFI:: SUM [ (MOLE%, . LHV ) + 100 ]
= SUM [ (MOLE%, c HHV) + 100 ]
= SUM [ (MOLE %i . DENSITY) + 100 ]
= DENSrry (LB/SCF) - DENSrry,crn p.0763 LB/SCF)
: HlfV + DENSITY
= StlM [ (MOLE%I . MW) + 100]
:106 . [(3.64.%H) + (1.53.%oC) + (0.14o%N) + (0.57'%S) - (0.46.%O)]+ cCV
: 106 . t F.57.%H) + (1.53 o%C) + (0.14.%N) + (0.57.%S) - (0.46.%O) I + cCV
= 106 . (0.321 o%C) + GCV
=0.209.Fa+F"
HIIVGTU/SCFI:
DENSITY [B/SCD:
SPECIFIC GRAYITY:
GCVGTU/LB):
MW OB/LBMOLE):
F6 @SCF/I}IMBTU):
F- (WSCFIIIIMBTID:
F" (SCF/I}IMBT[D:
Expected Foi
Location: -- - --
Source: --
Project No.: --
Run No. /IllethodRun I / Method 3A
Or - Outlet Concentration (CqJ, Yo dry
co: (cou._co)* ( ,""*-fu" "J
where,Cou.J: average anallzer value during test % dryCo.3: average of pretest & posttest zero responses,Yo dry
C"oA: actual concentation of calibration gas, % dry
CM : average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, o/o dry
Co, Oz Concentation,Yo dry
Location: -- - -
Source: --
ProJect No.: -
Run No. /l}Iethod Run I / Method 3A
COr - Ouflet Concentretion (C6sJ, '/o dry
Cco: (Cou,-Co)* ( ffi,J
= average analyzer value during test % dry
Co.;: average of pretest & posttest zero responses, 7o dry
Cr,&{ #N/A = actual concentation of calibration gas,o/o dry
cM
Cco,
average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, o/o dry: COz Concentation,o/o dry
where,
Location: -- - --
Source: --
Project No.: -
Run No. /Itlethod Run I / Method 7E
NOx - Outlet Concentretion (Cp6), ppmvd
Cwo*: (Co5.-Cs)x f ,?*, \'uo! -v'-- \ CCidql'/
where,Cou.J: average analyzervalue during test ppmvd
Co.;: average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA #N/A : actual concentation of calibration gas, ppmvd
Cr.;: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CNo* NOx Concentation, ppmvd
NOr - Outlet Emlsslon Factor (EFr.roroJ,lb/IIMBtu
EFxo*oa: ERNo,xKxFd. (7.dffi;)
where,Cn*::NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
K 1.19482F.07 : constrant, lb/dscf . ppmvd
Fd
.T : fuel factor, dscflMMBtu
Cr...-: oxygen concentration, oZ
EFNo*oa : lb/lvIMBtu
piltErre
lEoF[]i.J.ga! cnouP
Sourcc: -
Protcst No.: -D.tc
tttttrod untcnl EPA
02
MTXG
Modcl
SAl
Snrn
;vllnder Numbcr II)bro
Mtd
Hlrh
NA
Cvllndcr Cerdflcd Vducs
aa?o
Mld
IIloh
u.u
Zerc
Mld
IIloh
adlbradon G{ Selccdotr ('/. of SDan)
Mtd
l{leh
Cdlbrrtlor Eror Perfomrncc (7r of Sorn)
LG?O
Mid
IIloh
Llne*llt ('/e of Rrtrsc)
Analyza Matc:
Analpcr Modcl:
Analpa SN:
Environics ID:
CompooaVBalucc Ga:
Cylindcr Gas ID @ilution):
Cylindcr Ga Conccntration (Dilution), %:
Cytinda Gm ID (Mid-kvct):
Cylinda Gas ConccnEatior (Mid-Irvel), %:
allASTEnvironicUnishavc2-l0LMdsFlowConEollcs. Forthcscuitsthe90%@7lpmnd80%@Tlpminjcctiooswillnotbccouducted
Avcrrge
Anelyrcr
Cotrccntrrdon(./^\
Inlccdon I
Error
( +2y.\
I{ccdotr 2
Error
( *2./.r
Iulccdon 3
Emor
( +2./.r
to
ulllDnnon
Gu
Conccntrrdo[t./^\
hlftfion I
Andyrrr
Concenfrdotrl./^r
lnJccuon z
ADdyr.r
Conccntrrflon
l./.\
rnJccnotr J
Altrllz.l
Concentrrtlonl./-\
Avcrrgc
Andlzer
Concentrrtlont./.\
DlffercDcel./.\
Avcrrgc
Error
( +2%r