DAQ-2025-001856

1

DAQC-332-25
Site ID 10847 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – HYDRO EXTRUSION USA, LLC – Unrecycled Aluminum
Scrap Production – Utah County

THROUGH: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Oil and Gas Section Manager

FROM: Kyle Greenberg, Environmental Scientist

DATE: March 31, 2025

SUBJECT: Sources: Melting Furnace #21
Location: 1550 Hydro Way, Spanish Fork, UT 84660
Contact: Cecil Jacobson: 801-798-4716
Tester: Alliance Technical Group
Site ID #: 10847
Permit/AO #: Approval Order DAQE-AN108470016-22 dated July 12, 2022
Subject: Review of Stack Test Report dated March 5, 2025

On March 5, 2025, the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a test report for Melting Furnace
#21 at the Unrecycled Aluminum Scrap Production Facility in Utah County, Utah. Testing was performed
October 1, 2024, through October 3, 2024, to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits found in
Condition II.B.1.b of the Approval Order DAQE-AN108470016-22 and 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart RRR.
The test results are:

Source Test Date Test
Methods Pollutants Tester Results Limits
Melting Furnace #21
Condition 1 (20%
Painted Charge)
October 1-2,
2024
M23
Dioxins
and
Furans
3.85 ug
TEQ/MG of
feed/charge
15 ug
TEQ/MG of
feed/charge
M9 VEO 26.5% 10%
Melting Furnace #21
Condition 2 (30%
Painted Charge)
October 2-3,
2024
M23
Dioxins
and
Furans
2.34 ug
TEQ/MG of
feed/charge
15 ug
TEQ/MG of
feed/charge
M9 VEO 20.2% 10%

DEVIATIONS: None.

CONCLUSION: The stack test results show Melting Furnace #21 is out of compliance
with its visible emission limits.
4 ' - ) - "
2

RECOMMENDATION: The emissions from Melting Furnace #21 should be considered to have
been out of compliance with the visible emission limits during the time
of testing. Method 9 states that opacity shall be determined as an average
of 24 consecutive observations recorded at 15-second intervals (6-minute
averages). Neither the AO nor 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart RRR call for the
opacity average to be determined as a 1-hour average.

HPV: None.

ATTACHMENTS: Hydro Extrusion Stack Test Reports

March 5, 2025

Division of Air Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT

Subject: Test Report for Melting Furnace #21
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC – Spanish Fork Facility
Permit No. DAQE-AN108470016-22

Dear UDEQ – Air Quality:
In April 2024, Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC (Hydro) submitted a Notification Performance Testing for
Temporary Compliance Discretion for its Melting Furnace #21 and conducted a follow-up
conversation with Utah Division of Air Quality (DEQ) to clarify the intent of this performance test.
The intent was to evaluate an increase to the Facility-specific operating parameter (10% painted scrap
per total furnace charge) that is used to demonstrate ongoing compliance with the applicable 40 CFR
Part 63, Subpart RRR D/F emissions standard. In October 2024, Hydro performed opacity testing via
Method 9 and D/F testing per 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart RRR, which was well under the applicable
D/F emissions standard at the higher painted scrap scenarios. The results of the performance test for
both D/F and opacity have been submitted through DAQ’s online portal. Hydro would like to have a
phone conversation with DEQ to discuss path forward regarding an AO modification to use more than
10% painted scrap based on the test results.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at 303-802-0703.
Respectfully,

Nick Butel
Senior Environmental Engineer
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC

Attachment, via DAQ’s online portal: Source Test Report
Source Test Report
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
1550 Hydro Way
Spanish Fork, UT 84660
Source Tested: Melting Furnace #21 Test Dates: October 1-3, 2024
Project No. AST-2024-4545
Prepared By Alliance Technical Group, LLC 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Source Test Report
Test Program Summary
AST-2024-4545 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page i
Regulatory Information
UDAQ Permit No. DAQE-AN108470016-22
Regulatory Applicability 40 CFR 63, Subpart RRR
Source Information
Source Name Target Parameters Melting Furnace #21 D/F, VEE
Contact Information
Test Location Test Company Analytical Laboratory
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
1550 Hydro Way
Spanish Fork, UT 84660
Facility Contact
Cecil Jacobson
[e-mail]
[phone]
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
[phone]
Field Team Leader
Alan Jensen
[e-mail]
[phone]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
[e-mail]
[phone]
Report Coordinator
Eric Wentz
[e-mail]
[phone]
Report Reviewer
Erica Bolek
[e-mail]
[phone]
Eurofins TestAmerica
5815 Middlebrook Pike
Knoxville, TN 37921
Kevin Woodcock
[e-mail]
[phone]
Page 2 of 109
Source Test Report
Certification Statement
AST-2024-4545 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page ii
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
Charles Horton Operations Manager Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Date
Facility Certification
The following certification applies to the compliance test performed on the Melting Furnace #21 at Hydro Extrusion
USA, LLC on October 1-3, 2024.
Testing was conducted while the source was operating at the rate and/or conditions specified in the applicable
approval order, operating permit, or federal regulation.
During testing, the source combusted fuels, used raw materials, and maintained process conditions representative of
normal operations, and operated under such other relevant conditions specified by the Director.
Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information contained in the
report are true, accurate, and complete.
Cecil Jacobson Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Date
03/03/25
Page 3 of 109
03/05/25

Source Test Report
Table of Contents

AST-2024-4545 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1-1
1.1 Facility Description ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Emission Unit Description .......................................................................................................................... 1-1
1.3 Process Conditions and Parameters ............................................................................................................. 1-1
1.4 Project Team ............................................................................................................................................... 1-2
1.5 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification ........................................................................................................ 1-2
1.6 Test Program Notes ..................................................................................................................................... 1-2
2.0 Summary of Results .................................................................................................................................... 2-1
3.0 Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 3-1
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Volumetric Flow Rate ......................................................... 3-1
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method ALT-153 – Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide .................................................... 3-1
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content ............................................................................ 3-1
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 9 – Visible Emission Evaluations ......................................................... 3-1
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 23 / ALT-034 – Dioxins and Furans ..................................................... 3-2
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method ALT-153 .................................... 3-2

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1: Emission Unit .......................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Table 1-2: Project Team ........................................................................................................................................... 1-2
Table 2-1: Summary of Results – Condition 1 (20% Painted Charge) ..................................................................... 2-1
Table 2-2: Summary of Results – Condition 2 (30% Painted Charge) ..................................................................... 2-2
Table 2-3: Process Data Summary............................................................................................................................ 2-3
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................. 3-1
APPENDICES Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Laboratory Data
Appendix D Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix E Process Operating/Control System Data
Appendix F SSTP and Associated Documentation

Page 4 of 109

Introduction

Page 5 of 109

Source Test Report
Introduction

AST-2024-4545 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 1-1
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC (Hydro) to conduct
compliance testing at the Spanish Fork, Utah (UT) facility. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of the
Utah Department of Environmental Quality – Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Permit No. DAQE-AN108470016-
22 and 40 CFR 63, Subpart RRR. Testing was conducted to determine visible emissions and the emission rate of
dioxins and furans (D/F) from the exhaust of the Melting Furnace #21 at two (2) different feed/charge conditions.
1.1 Facility Description
Hydro operates a secondary aluminum production facility in Spanish Fork, UT. Hydro currently operates extrusion,
fabrication, finishing and cast house services at the facility. Clean charge, painted scrap, and aluminum scrap are
melted to produce aluminum alloys in the casting process for use in this and other facilities. The clean charge and
aluminum scrap are melted in a natural gas-fired melting furnace and then transferred to a holding furnace for
alloying and fluxing. The molten aluminum is refined further through several spinning nozzle inert flotation (SNIF)
units prior to the casting of “logs” in the direct chill casting units. The cast aluminum logs are heat treated in
homogenizing furnaces and cut into “billets” prior to use in subsequent extrusion operations. The logs or billets are
then reheated and extruded into product shapes by extrusion presses. Extruded products are further processed
through “aging” furnaces to harden the aluminum and strengthen the extrusion.

Charge materials for the Melting Furnace consist of:
• Clean charge: as defined in 40 CFR §63.1503 and including purchased extrusion scrap from Hydro internal
and other external suppliers. Examples of clean charge include: Prime, Remelt Scrap Ingot (RSI), EC wire,
New Bare Extrusion, Bare/NP, and Bare.
• Other than clean charge, aka “purchased scrap”:
o Painted: Hydro internal coated scrap, and coated scrap from external suppliers. Examples include
painted, painted extrusion, new production painted/NP.
o Not Painted: Hydro internal purchased scrap containing coatings and lubricants. Examples of other
than clean – not painted include extrusion, pucks, shreds, automotive wheels, sheet/plate/clip/SP.
1.2 Emission Unit Description
The emission unit description is presented in Table 1-1.
Table 1-1: Emission Unit
Emission Unit UDAQ Permitted Equipment ID UDEQ Description
Melting Furnace #21 II.A.3 Furnace Natural Gas Regenerative
Melting Furnace, 35.4 MMBTU/hr

1.3 Process Conditions and Parameters
The Melting Furnace was operated under normal conditions with no upset. The batch process is operated
throughout the day. The testing was conducted under conditions expected to produce the highest levels of HAP
emissions per unit charged (considering the extent of feed/charge contamination and feed/charge rate).
Page 6 of 109

Source Test Report
Introduction

AST-2024-4545 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 1-2
1.4 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-2: Project Team
Facility Personnel
Cecil Jacobson
Nick Butel
Bill Ferre
Regulatory Personnel No UDAQ personnel on site during testing
Alliance Personnel
Alan Jensen
Alan Barrios
Patrick Doyle
Supilani Mailei
1.5 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ.
1.6 Test Program Notes
No technical difficulties or method deviations occurred during the sampling portion of this test program.

The following analytical issues were documented in the laboratory report. See the Laboratory Report in Appendix C
for additional information.

The laboratory control sample (LCS) and laboratory control sample duplicate (LCSD) for preparation batch 140-
92468 and 140-94024 and analytical batch 140-94335 recovered above acceptance limits for several analytes. The
entire sample was consumed during analysis or extraction therefore, the data have been reported.

One or more ion abundance ratios were outside criteria for the Isotope Dilution Analyte (IDA) associated with the
following samples: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINED (140-38877-1), M23
MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 2 COMBINED (140-38877-2) and M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINED (140-38877-4).

Organic Prep
Method Combined Prep: Due to a crack in extraction glassware, approximately 50% of sample M23 MELTING
FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINED (140-38877-6) was lost.

Method Split: The following samples required a Gel-Permeation clean up, via EPA method 3640A, to reduce matrix
interference: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINED (140-38877-1), M23 MELTING
FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 2 COMBINED (140-38877-2), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 3
COMBINED (140-38877-3), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINED (140-38877-4), M23
MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 2 COMBINED (140-38877-5), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINED (140-38877-6), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 FIELD BLANK COMBINED
(140-38877-7) and M23 MEDIA CHECK A-2429 FILTER,A-2428 XAD COMBINED (140-38877-12).
Page 7 of 109

Source Test Report
Introduction

AST-2024-4545 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 1-3
Method Split: The following samples required a Gel-Permeation clean up, via EPA method 3640A, to reduce matrix
interference: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINED (140-38877-1), M23 MELTING
FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 2 COMBINED (140-38877-2), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 3
COMBINED (140-38877-3), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINED (140-38877-4), M23
MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 2 COMBINED (140-38877-5), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINED (140-38877-6), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 FIELD BLANK COMBINED
(140-38877-7) and M23 MEDIA CHECK A-2429 FILTER,A-2428 XAD COMBINED (140-38877-12).

Page 8 of 109

Summary of Results

Page 9 of 109

Source Test Report
Summary of Results

AST-2024-4545 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 2-1
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Hydro facility in Spanish Fork, UT on October 1-3, 2024. Testing
consisted of determining the visible emissions and emission rate of D/F from the exhaust of the Melting Furnace #21
at two (2) different feed/charge conditions.

Tables 2-1 and 2-2 provide summaries of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable 40 CFR 60,
Subpart RRR and UDAQ permit limits. Table 2-3 provides a summary of the process operating data collected
during testing. Any difference between the summary of results listed in the following tables and the detailed results
contained in the appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Results – Condition 1 (20% Painted Charge)
Emission Data
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 10/01/24 10/01/24 10/02/24 --
Dioxin/Furan Data 1
Concentration, grain/dscf 1.1E-09 6.6E-10 4.7E-10 7.5E-10
Emission Rate, lb/hr 1.5E-07 9.2E-08 6.5E-08 1.0E-07
Emission Factor, ug TEQ/MG of feed/charge 5.54 3.04 2.95 3.85
NESHAP Limit, ug TEQ/MG of feed/charge -- -- -- 15.0
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 26
Visible Emission Evaluations
Average 1-Hr Opacity, % 4.8 2.3 2.4 --
Highest 6-Minute Opacity, % 26.5 11.9 13.5 --
UDAQ Permit Limit, % -- -- -- <10
1 D/F TEQ values were calculated using 1989 NATO TEFs.

Page 10 of 109

Source Test Report
Summary of Results

AST-2024-4545 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 2-2
Table 2-2: Summary of Results – Condition 2 (30% Painted Charge)
Emission Data
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 10/02/24 10/03/24 10/03/24 --
Dioxin/Furan Data 1
Concentration, grain/dscf 4.0E-10 6.1E-10 5.1E-10 5.1E-10
Emission Rate, lb/hr 5.2E-08 8.7E-08 6.9E-08 6.9E-08
Emission Factor, ug TEQ/MG of feed/charge 1.80 2.98 2.23 2.34
NESHAP Limit, ug TEQ/MG of feed/charge -- -- -- 15.0
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 16
Visible Emission Evaluations
Average 1-Hr Opacity, % 2.6 6.3 4.3 --
Highest 6-Minute Opacity, % 12.5 15.2 20.2 --
UDAQ Permit Limit, % -- -- -- <10
1 D/F TEQ values were calculated using 1989 NATO TEFs.
Page 11 of 109

Source Test Report
Summary of Results

AST-2024-4545 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 2-3
Table 2-3: Process Data Summary
Process Data – Condition 1 (20% Painted Charge)
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
Date 10/01/24 10/01/24 10/02/24
Cast Number s24100103 s24100104 s24100203
Test Run Start Time 8:50 11:48 11:36
Test Run End Time 11:32 14:56 15:37
Feed Rate, lb/hr 26,311 30,402 21,944
Clean Charge Weight Total, lb 36,820 50,020 58,490
Other than Clean – Painted, lb 15,700 23,500 19,430
Other than Clean – Painted, % 22.1 24.7 22.0
Other than Clean – Not Painted, lb 18,520 21,740 10,220
Other than Clean – Not Painted, % 26.1 22.8 11.6
Total Charge Weight, lb 71,040 95,260 88,140
Process Data – Condition 2 (30% Painted Charge)
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
Date 10/02/24 10/03/24 10/03/24
Cast Number s24100204 s24100302 s24100303
Test Run Start Time 16:16 8:30 12:15
Test Run End Time 19:26 11:55 15:05
Feed Rate, lb/hr 28,933 29,047 31,119
Clean Charge Weight Total, lb 57,820 46,020 39,940
Other than Clean – Painted, lb 28,240 29,680 29,040
Other than Clean – Painted, % 30.8 30.1 32.9
Other than Clean – Not Painted, lb 5,560 23,060 19,190
Other than Clean – Not Painted, % 6.1 23.3 21.8
Total Charge Weight, lb 91,620 98,760 88,170

Page 12 of 109

Testing Methodology

Page 13 of 109

Source Test Report
Testing Methodology

AST-2024-4545 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 3-1
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix D.
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology

Parameter U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Volumetric Flow Rate 1 & 2 Full Velocity Traverses
Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide ALT-153 Integrated Bag / Instrumental Analysis
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Visible Emission Evaluations 9 Certified Observer
Dioxins / Fuans 23 / ALT-034 Isokinetic Sampling
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-1 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 1.

Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.

Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was
utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method ALT-153 – Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Alternative Test
Method ALT-153. One (1) integrated Tedlar bag sample was collected during each test run. The bag samples were
analyzed on site with a gas analyzer. The remaining stack gas constituent was assumed to be nitrogen for the stack
gas molecular weight determination. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content (BWS) was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The
gas conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a
known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on
the same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 9 – Visible Emission Evaluations
The stack gas opacity was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 9. Visible emission
evaluations were conducted by a certified visible emissions evaluator. Opacity readings were recorded in 15-second
intervals during each of three (3) 60-minute evaluations per testing condition.

Page 14 of 109

Source Test Report
Testing Methodology

AST-2024-4545 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 3-2
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 23 / ALT-034 – Dioxins and Furans
The dioxins and furans (D/F) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 23 with
guidance from Alternative Method 034. The sampling system consisted of a glass nozzle, heated glass-lined probe,
glass filter holder with pre-cleaned heated glass-fiber filter, condenser coil, XAD sorbent module, gas conditioning
train, pump and calibrated dry gas meter. The gas conditioning system consisted of five (5) chilled impingers. The
XAD Trap was followed by an empty impinger, and the next two (2) impingers each contained 100 mL of water.
The fourth impinger was empty while the fifth impinger was charged with 200-300 grams of silica gel. The probe
liner and filter heating systems were maintained at a temperature of 120 ± 14°C (248 ±25°F), and the impinger
temperature was maintained at 20°C (68°F) or less throughout testing.

Method 23 Section 6.1.7 requires the condenser to be oriented at an angle to cause moisture to flow down to the
XAD adsorbent module to facilitate condensate drainage. Glassware with this configuration is not currently
available from a national supplier utilizing a large enough condenser to meet the temperature specifications of the
method. Alliance will continue to work with manufacturers, but until equipment is widely available, the horizontal
or vertical condenser configuration from traditional Method 23 will be utilized.

All glassware leading to the XAD adsorbing resin trap was cleaned and sealed before mobilizing to the site.
Glassware cleaning consisted of washing with warm soapy water and rinsing with distilled water and acetone. The
sampling train was assembled in the sample recovery area. The glass-fiber filter was placed in a glass filter holder
with a Teflon filter support and connected to the condenser coil. All open ends of the sampling train were sealed
with Teflon tape prior to complete assembly at the sampling location.

Following the completion of each test run, the sampling train was leak checked at vacuum pressure greater than or
equal to the highest vacuum pressure observed during the run and the contents of the impingers were measured for
moisture gain. The XAD sorbent module was sealed on both ends and placed on ice. The filter was removed from
the filter holder and placed in sample container 1. The nozzle, probe liner, filter holder, condenser and all
connecting glassware were triple-rinsed and brushed with acetone and then toluene, and these rinses were recovered
in sample container 2. All containers were sealed, labeled and liquid levels marked for transport to the identified
laboratory for analysis.
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method ALT-153
EPA Protocol 1 Calibration Gases
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol 1 (+/- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.

Direct Calibration & Calibration Error Test
Low-Level gas was collected in a Tedlar bag and introduced to the instrument. After adjusting the analyzer to the
Low-Level gas concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This
process was repeated for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration
gases were sequentially collected in a Tedlar bag and introduced to the instrument. All values were within 2.0
percent of the Calibration Span.
System Bias and Response Time
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was collected in a Tedlar bag and
introduced to the instrument and the time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5% (whichever
was less restrictive) of the gas concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a
Page 15 of 109

Source Test Report
Testing Methodology

AST-2024-4545 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 3-3
stable value as defined in ALT-153 Section 4.5, and this value was recorded. Next, Low-Level gas was collected in
a Tedlar bag and introduced to the instrument and the time required for the analyzer reading to decrease to a value
within 5.0 percent or 0.5% (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low-Level gas was zero gas, the
response was 0.5% or 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration (whichever was less restrictive). The analyzer
reading was observed until it reached a stable value as defined in ALT-153 Section 4.5, and this value was recorded.
The initial system bias was determined from these data. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the Calibration
Span.

Post Test System Bias Checks
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was collected in a Tedlar bag and
introduced to the instrument. After the analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas
was collected in a Tedlar bag and introduced to the instrument, and the analyzer value recorded once it reached a
stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5% absolute difference or the
data was invalidated, and the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated.

Post Test Drift Checks
Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3 percent of the Calibration Span. If the drift exceeded 3
percent, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated.

Data Collection
After instrument calibration, each sample bag was introduced to the appropriate analyzer according to the
procedures in ALT-153 Section 4.1. The analysis continued until the following criteria were met, at which point the
concentrations were recorded:

%CO2
• Differ by no more than 0.3% when CO2 is greater than 4.0%, or,
• Differ by no more than 0.2% when CO2 is less than 4.0%.
%O2
• Differ by no more than 0.3% when O2 is less than 15.0%, or,
• Differ by no more than 0.2% when O2 is greater than 15.0%.

At the completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field
Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance’s office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
Page 16 of 109
Appendix A

Page 17 of 109
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg
∆ H
13.6
where,
Pb 25.97 = barometric pressure, in. Hg
ΔH 1.369 = pressure differential of orifice, in H2O
Pm 26.07 = in. Hg
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg
Pg
13.6
where,
Pb 25.97 = barometric pressure, in. Hg
Pg 0.07 = static pressure, in. H2O
Ps 25.98 = in. Hg
Standard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf
where,
Y 0.989 = meter correction factor
Vm 108.981 = meter volume, cf
Pm 26.07 = absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
Tm 537.3 = absolute meter temperature, oR
Vmstd 92.232 = dscf
Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf
Vwstd = 0.04716 x Vlc
where,
Vlc 83.2 = weight of H2O collected, g
Vwstd 3.924 = scf
Pm = Pb +
Ps = Pb +
Vmstd = 17.636 x Y x Vm x Pm
Tm
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
AST-2024-4545
1
DF
Page 18 of 109
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
AST-2024-4545
1
DF
Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimensionless (theoretical at saturated conditions)
10(6.37 - (2,827/(Ts + 365)))
Ps
where,
Ts 611.0 = stack temperature, °F
Ps 25.98 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
BWSsat 1.000 = dimensionless
Note: the theoretical maximum moisture content of the flue gas, which we cap at 1.0 to reflect 100% moisture.
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless (measured)
where,
Vwstd 3.924 = standard wet volume, scf
Vmstd 92.232 = standard meter volume, dscf
BWS 0.041 = dimensionless
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat < BWSmsd
where,
BWSsat 1.000 = moisture fraction (theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd 0.041 = moisture fraction (measured)
BWS 0.041
Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lb/lb-mole
Md = (0.44 x %CO₂) + (0.32 x %O₂) + (0.28 x [100 - %CO₂ - %O₂] )
where,
CO₂ 1.9 = carbon dioxide concentration, %
O₂ 17.8 = oxygen concentration, %
Md 29.02 = lb/lb mol
BWSsat =
BWS = ( Vwstd + Vmstd )
Vwstd
Page 19 of 109
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
AST-2024-4545
1
DF
Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/lb-mole
Ms = ( Md x [1 - BWS] ) + (18.015 x BWS)
where,
Md 29.02 = molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
BWS 0.041 = moisture fraction, dimensionless
Ms 28.57 = lb/lb mol
Average Velocity (Vs), ft/sec
Vs =
where,
Cp 0.840 = pitot tube coefficient
Δ P1/2 0.348 = velocity head of stack gas, (in. H2O)1/2
Ts 1070.6 = absolute stack temperature, °R
Ps 25.98 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Ms 28.57 = molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb mol
Vs 30.0 = ft/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm
Qa = 60 x Vs x As
where,
Vs 30.0 = stack gas velocity, ft/sec
As 20.80 = cross-sectional area of stack, ft2
Qa 37,456 = acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm
where,
Qa 37,456 = average stack gas flow at stack conditions, acfm
BWS 0.041 = moisture fraction, dimensionless
Ps 25.98 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Ts 1070.6 = absolute stack temperature, °R
Qs 15,372 = dscfm
TsQs =
85.49 x Cp x (Δ P1/2 ) avg x
17.636 x Qa x (1 - BWS) x Ps
Ts
Ps x Ms
Page 20 of 109
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
AST-2024-4545
1
DF
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check (Yqa), dimensionless
where,
Y 0.989 = meter correction factor, dimensionless
Θ 150 = run time, min.
Vm 108.981 = total meter volume, dcf
Tm 537.3 = absolute meter temperature, °R
ΔH@ 1.741 = orifice meter calibration coefficient, in. H2O
Pb 25.97 = barometric pressure, in. Hg
ΔH avg 1.369 = average pressure differential of orifice, in H2O
Md 29.02 = molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
(Δ H)1/2 1.164 = average squareroot pressure differential of orifice, (in. H2O)1/2
Yqa 0.5 = percent
Volume of Nozzle (Vn), ft3
Vm x Pm x Y
Tm
where,
Ts 1070.6 = absolute stack temperature, °R
Ps 25.98 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Vlc 83.2 = volume of H2O collected, ml
Vm 108.981 = meter volume, cf
Pm 26.07 = absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
Y 0.989 = meter correction factor, unitless
Tm 537.3 = absolute meter temperature, oR
Vn 224.711 = volume of nozzle, ft3
Isokinetic Sampling Rate (I), %
where,
Vn 224.711 = nozzle volume, ft3
θ 150.0 = run time, minutes
An 0.00083 = area of nozzle, ft2
Vs 30.0 = average velocity, ft/sec
I 100.3 = %
)
PsVn =
Ts x ( 0.002669 x Vlc +
Yqa =
Y −
Θ
Vm 0.0319 × Tm × 29
ΔH@ × Pb + Δ Havg.
13.6 × Md
ΔH avg.
Y × 100
Page 21 of 109
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
AST-2024-4545
1
DF
where,
MD/F 6,614.6 = D/F TEQ mass, pg
Vmstd 92.232 = standard meter volume, dscf
CD/F 1.1E-09 = grain TEQ/dscf
D/F TEQ Concentration (CD/F), ng TEQ/ft3
where,
MD/F 6,614.6 = D/F TEQ mass, pg
Vmstd 92.232 = standard meter volume, dscf
CD/F 7.2E-02 = ng TEQ/ft3
D/F TEQ Emission Rate (ERDF), lb TEQ/hr
where,
CD/F 7.2E-02 = D/F TEQ concentration, ng/ft3
Qs 15,372 = average stack gas flow at standard conditions, dscfm
ERDF 1.5E-07 = lb TEQ/hr
D/F TEQ Emission Factor (EFDF), ug TEQ/MG
where,
ERDF 1.5E-07 = D/F TEQ emission rate, lb TEQ /hr
FR 26,311 = process feed rate, lb/hr
EFDF 5.54 = ug TEQ/MG
D/F TEQ Concentration (CD/F), grain TEQ/dscf
𝐶஽/ி =𝑀஽/ி × 1.54𝐸−11
𝑉𝑚𝑠𝑡𝑑
𝐶஽/ி =𝑀஽/ி
𝑉𝑚𝑠𝑡𝑑×  1.0𝐸+03
𝐸𝑅஽ி =𝐶஽/ி × 𝑄௦  × 60
4.54 𝐸+11
𝐸𝐹஽ி =𝐸𝑅஽ி  × 1.0𝐸 + 12
𝐹𝑅
Page 22 of 109

Appendix B

Page 23 of 109
Condition 1
Page 24 of 109
Method 1 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date:
Vertical
Circular
67.75 in
6.00 in
61.75 in
20.80 ft2
2
4.75 ft
0.9 (must be ≥ 0.5)
15.0 ft
2.9 (must be ≥ 2)24
24
1
Measurer (Initial and Date):ALB 9/30
Reviewer (Initial and Date):SPR 9/30
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 14.6 --6.7 --4.4 --3.2 --2.6 --2.1 1 2.1 1.30 7 5/16
2 85.4 --25.0 --14.6 --10.5 --8.2 --6.7 2 6.7 4.14 10 1/8
3 ----75.0 --29.6 --19.4 --14.6 --11.8 3 11.8 7.29 13 5/16
4 ----93.3 --70.4 --32.3 --22.6 --17.7 4 17.7 10.93 16 15/16
5 --------85.4 --67.7 --34.2 --25.0 5 25.0 15.44 21 7/16
6 --------95.6 --80.6 --65.8 --35.6 6 35.6 21.98 28
7 ------------89.5 --77.4 --64.4 7 64.4 39.77 45 3/4
8 ------------96.8 --85.4 --75.0 8 75.0 46.31 52 5/16
9 ----------------91.8 --82.3 9 82.3 50.82 56 13/16
10 ----------------97.4 --88.2 10 88.2 54.46 60 7/16
11 --------------------93.3 11 93.3 57.61 63 5/8
12 --------------------97.9 12 97.9 60.45 66 7/16
*Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point.
A =4.75 ft.
B =15 ft.
Depth of Duct =61.75 in.
Duct Orientation:
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
AST-2024-4545
09/30/24
Stack Parameters
Duct Design:
Nipple Length:
Depth of Duct:
Cross Sectional Area of Duct:
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port:
No. of Test Ports:
Number of Readings per Point:
Distance A:
Distance A Duct Diameters:
Distance B:
Distance B Duct Diameters:
Minimum Number of Traverse Points:
Actual Number of Traverse Points:
CIRCULAR DUCT
Number of traverse points on a diameter
Stack Diagram
Cross Sectional Area
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Traverse Point % of Diameter
Distance from inside wall
Distance from outside of port
Upstream Disturbance
Downstream
Disturbance
B
A
Page 25 of 109
Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Source Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
Project No.AST-2024-4545
Date 09/30/24
Sample Point Angle (ΔP=0)
1 3
2 0
3 8
4 6
5 0
6 4
7 7
8 2
9 1
10 3
11 5
12 0
13 3
14 9
15 0
16 10
17 9
18 2
19 0
20 3
21 5
22 8
23 9
24 10
Average 4
Page 26 of 109
Emission Calculations
Location
SourceProject No.
Parameter
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 10/1/24 10/1/24 10/2/24 --
Start Time 8:50 11:48 11:36 --
Stop Time 11:32 14:56 15:37 --
Run Time, min (θ)150.0 180.0 235.0 188.3
2,3,7,8-TCDD Mass, pg 247 183 252 227.3
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD Mass, pg 1070 876 1040 995.3
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD Mass, pg 956 753 785 831.3
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD Mass, pg 1070 1160 1370 1200.0
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD Mass, pg 2570 2470 2460 2500.0
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD Mass, pg 4230 3630 3710 3856.7
OCDD Mass, pg 3940 2700 2770 3136.7
Other TCDD Mass, pg 8750 7050 10500 8766.7
Other PeCDD Mass, pg 11600 12100 12800 12166.7
Other HxCDD Mass, pg 12500 14600 15600 14233.3
Other HpCDD Mass, pg 8060 7560 7570 7730.0
2,3,7,8-TCDF Mass, pg 1270 931 1460 1220.3
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF Mass, pg 2590 1660 1660 1970.0
2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF Mass, pg 6590 3460 3880 4643.3
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF Mass, pg 7570 4460 4440 5490.0
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF Mass, pg 3250 1930 1660 2280.0
2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF Mass, pg 5560 3370 3870 4266.7
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF Mass, pg 470 339 347 385.3
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF Mass, pg 7080 3580 2960 4540.0
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF Mass, pg 1640 893 745 1092.7
OCDF Mass, pg 3090 1390 1130 1870.0
Other TCDF Mass, pg 61300 26600 31300 39733.3
Other PeCDF Mass, pg 49100 21700 23300 31366.7
Other HxCDF Mass, pg 31400 16400 16300 21366.7
Other HpCDF Mass, pg 13700 6700 5340 8580.0
Italicized values were flagged by the laboratory. See laboratory report in Appendix C for details.
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1AST-2024-4545
DF
INPUT DATA
Page 27 of 109
Emission Calculations
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 10/1/24 10/1/24 10/2/24 --
Start Time 8:50 11:48 11:36 --
Stop Time 11:32 14:56 15:37 --
Run Duration, min 162 188 241 197.0
Feed Rate, ton/hr (FR)13.2 15.2 11.0 13.1
Feed Rate, lb/hr (FR)26,311 30,402 21,944 26,219
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)25.97 25.97 25.26 25.73
Meter Correction Factor (Y)0.989 0.998 0.989 --
Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @)1.741 1.824 1.741 --
Meter Volume, ft3 (Vm)108.981 112.995 183.783 135.253
Meter Temperature, °F (Tm)77.6 90.4 91.0 86.4
Meter Temperature, °R (Tm)537.3 550.1 550.7 546.0
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (ΔH)1.369 1.053 1.553 1.325
Volume H2O Collected, mL (Vlc)83.2 87.4 111.9 94.2
Nozzle Diameter, in (Dn)0.390 0.350 0.390 0.377
Area of Nozzle, ft2 (An)0.0008 0.0007 0.0008 0.0008
D/F TEQ TEQ Mass, pg (MD/F)(TEF)6,614.6 4,060.4 4,512.3 5,062.4
2,3,7,8-TCDD TEQ Mass, pg 1 247.0 183.0 252.0 227.3
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD TEQ Mass, pg 0.5 535.0 438.0 520.0 497.7
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 95.6 75.3 78.5 83.1
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 107.0 116.0 137.0 120.0
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 257.0 247.0 246.0 250.0
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD TEQ Mass, pg 0.01 42.3 36.3 37.1 38.6
OCDD TEQ Mass, pg 0.001 3.9 2.7 2.8 3.1
2,3,7,8-TCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 127.0 93.1 146.0 122.0
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.05 129.5 83.0 83.0 98.5
2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.5 3,295.0 1,730.0 1,940.0 2,321.7
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 757.0 446.0 444.0 549.0
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 325.0 193.0 166.0 228.0
2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 556.0 337.0 387.0 426.7
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 47.0 33.9 34.7 38.5
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.01 70.8 35.8 29.6 45.4
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.01 16.4 8.9 7.5 10.9
OCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.001 3.1 1.4 1.1 1.9
Standard Meter Volume, ft3 (Vmstd)92.232 94.168 147.707 111.369
Standard Water Volume, ft3 (Vwstd)3.924 4.122 5.277 4.441
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd)0.041 0.042 0.034 0.039
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat)1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Moisture Fraction (BWS)0.041 0.042 0.034 0.039
Meter Pressure, in Hg (Pm)26.07 26.05 25.37 25.83
Volume at Nozzle, ft3 (Vn)224.711 234.091 360.671 273.157
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, (%)(I)100.3 100.4 98.3 99.6
DGM Calibration Check Value, (+/- 5%)(Yqa)0.5 0.8 -1.0 0.1
D/F TEQ Concentration, grain/dscf (CDF)1.1E-09 6.6E-10 4.7E-10 7.5E-10
D/F TEQ Concentration, ng/ft3 (CD/F)7.2E-02 4.3E-02 3.1E-02 4.8E-02
D/F TEQ Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERD/F)1.5E-07 9.2E-08 6.5E-08 1.0E-07
D/F TEQ Emission Factor, ug/MG (EFD/F)5.54 3.04 2.95 3.85
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
AST-2024-4545
DF
INPUT DATA
ISOKINETIC DATA
Page 28 of 109
Flow Information
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 10/1/24 10/1/24 10/2/24 --
Start Time 8:50 11:48 11:36 --
Stop Time 11:32 14:56 15:37 --
Run Time, min 150.0 180.0 235.0 188.3
Point 1 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16
Point 2 0.13 0.10 0.13 0.12
Point 3 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.14
Point 4 0.11 0.15 0.15 0.14
Point 5 0.14 0.16 0.13 0.14
Point 6 0.13 0.17 0.10 0.13
Point 7 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.12
Point 8 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.14
Point 9 0.12 0.16 0.13 0.14
Point 10 0.11 0.15 0.16 0.14
Point 11 0.10 0.14 0.15 0.13
Point 12 0.08 0.16 0.15 0.13
Point 13 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.15
Point 14 0.14 0.09 0.17 0.13
Point 15 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.15
Point 16 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.14
Point 17 0.15 0.14 0.16 0.15
Point 18 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.14
Point 19 0.12 0.13 0.16 0.14
Point 20 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.13
Point 21 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.13
Point 22 0.10 0.16 0.14 0.13
Point 23 0.09 0.15 0.13 0.12
Point 24 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.12
Square Root of ΔP, (in. WC)1/2 (ΔP) 0.348 0.371 0.364 0.361
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb) 25.97 25.97 25.26 25.73
Static Pressure, in. WC (Pg) 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Stack Pressure, in. Hg (Ps) 25.98 25.98 25.27 25.74
Stack Cross-sectional Area, ft2 (As) 20.80 20.80 20.80 20.80
Stack Temperature, °F (Ts) 611.0 631.4 590.9 611.1
Stack Temperature, °R (Ts) 1070.6 1091.1 1050.5 1070.8
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.041 0.042 0.034 0.039
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.041 0.042 0.034 0.039
O2 Concentration, %(O2)17.83 15.83 14.04 15.90
CO2 Concentration, %(CO2)1.93 2.59 4.03 2.85
N2 Concentration, %(N2)80.24 81.58 81.93 81.25
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry) (Md) 29.02 29.05 29.21 29.09
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet) (Ms) 28.57 28.58 28.82 28.66
Velocity, ft/sec (Vs) 30.0 32.3 31.4 31.2
At Stack Conditions, acfm (Qa) 37,456 40,317 39,151 38,975
At Standard Conditions, scfm (Qsw) 16,026 16,927 16,606 16,520
At Standard Conditions, dscfm (Qs)15,372 16,217 16,033 15,874
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
AST-2024-4545
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
CALCULATED DATA
VELOCITY HEAD, in. WC
DF
Page 29 of 109
Alt-153 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date
O₂CO₂O₂CO₂Make Servomex Servomex Span Value 23.99 23.90Model49004900Initial Instr. Zero Cal Response 0.00 -0.03S/N 100269 100269 Initial Instr. Upscale Cal Response 10.99 11.20Operating Range 25 100 Pretest System Zero Response ----Cylinder ID Posttest System Zero Response ----Zero NA NA Pretest System Upscale Response 10.98 11.18MidRR02538RR02538Posttest System Upscale Response 10.98 11.20HighEB0069884EB0069884Bias (%)Actual Concentration (% or ppm)Bias Criteria 5.00 5.00Zero0.00 0.00 Pretest Zero ----Mid 11.00 10.90 Posttest Zero ----
High 23.99 23.90 Pretest Span -0.04 -0.08Instrument Response (% or ppm)Posttest Span -0.04 0.00Zero0.00 -0.03 Drift (%)Mid 10.99 11.20 Drift Criteria 3.00 3.00High23.98 23.92 Zero --Performance (% of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)Mid 0.00 0.08
Zero 0.00 0.13Mid0.04 1.26High0.04 0.08Performance CriteriaZero 2.00 2.00Mid2.00 2.00
High 2.00 2.00StatusZeroPASSPASSMidPASSPASSHighPASSPASS
10 seconds
O₂CO₂O₂CO₂O₂CO₂Time % dry % dry Time % dry % dry Time % dry % dry14:21:08 17.84 1.93 14:25:08 15.83 2.60 13:53:05 14.06 4.0314:21:18 17.83 1.92 14:25:18 15.83 2.59 13:53:15 14.05 4.03
14:21:28 17.82 1.93 14:25:28 15.83 2.59 13:53:25 14.04 4.0114:21:38 17.82 1.94 14:25:38 15.83 2.61 13:53:35 14.04 4.0714:21:48 17.82 1.92 14:25:48 15.82 2.58 13:53:45 14.03 4.0314:21:58 17.82 1.92 14:25:58 15.82 2.58 13:53:55 14.02 4.01Average17.83 1.93 Average 15.83 2.59 Average 14.04 4.03
Instrument Reading Interval
Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
AST-2024-4545
10/1/24
Parameter Parameter
Page 30 of 109
Method 4 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
Analysis
Run 1 Date:10/1/24
Impinger No.1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O Empty Silica --
Initial Mass, g 359.8 476.4 727.7 725.7 642.3 928.1 3860.0
Final Mass, g 377.4 501.6 723.4 740.4 648.9 951.5 3943.2
Gain 17.6 25.2 -4.3 14.7 6.6 23.4 83.2
Run 2 Date:10/1/24
Impinger No.1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O Empty Silica --
Initial Mass, g 334.6 464.6 762.4 733.5 639.2 886.2 3820.5
Final Mass, g 356.4 498.0 759.5 747.6 643.0 903.4 3907.9
Gain 21.8 33.4 -2.9 14.1 3.8 17.2 87.4
Run 3 Date:10/2/24
Impinger No.1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O Empty Silica --
Initial Mass, g 369.2 501.6 723.4 740.4 648.9 951.5 3935.0
Final Mass, g 381.8 555.1 718.0 761.8 653.4 976.8 4046.9
Gain 12.6 53.5 -5.4 21.4 4.5 25.3 111.9
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
AST-2024-4545
DF
Gravimetric
Page 31 of 109
Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Start Time:Source:
Date: VALID End Time:Project No.:AST-2024-4545 DF
Moisture:5.0 % est.Est. Tm:75 °F Pb:25.97 in. Hg
Barometric:25.31 in. Hg Est. Ts:575 °F Pg:0.07 in. WC
Static Press:0.07 in. WC Est. ΔP:0.13 in. WC O2:17.83 %
Stack Press:25.32 in. Hg Est. Dn:0.392 in.CO2:1.93 %
CO2:7.0 %Target Rate:0.75 scfm Check Pt.Initial Final Corr.
O2:14.0 %LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf)--
N2/CO:79.0 %0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm):0.001 ------0.002 Mid 2 (cf)--
Md:29.68 lb/lb-mole GL.39 glass Vacuum (in Hg):15 ------10 Mid 3 (cf)--
Ms:29.10 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:Pass ------Pass --
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit NA
Amb.Amb.Amb.Amb.Amb.
Begin End 60 Ideal Actual 60 60 60 60
A1 0.00 5.00 0.15 585 1.64 1.60 5 246 250 56 55 100.6 33.12
2 5.00 10.00 0.13 523 1.53 1.50 5 255 252 42 60 100.3 29.91
3 10.00 15.00 0.14 484 1.71 1.70 5 251 249 43 60 100.7 30.41
4 15.00 20.00 0.11 584 1.23 1.20 5 252 253 44 60 100.0 28.35
5 20.00 25.00 0.14 595 1.55 1.60 5 251 256 44 61 100.5 32.15
6 25.00 30.00 0.13 622 1.42 1.40 5 250 249 45 61 99.8 31.38
7 30.00 35.00 0.12 580 1.36 1.40 5 251 251 47 61 101.4 29.55
8 35.00 40.00 0.12 540 1.41 1.40 5 249 244 50 62 101.4 28.98
9 40.00 45.00 0.12 629 1.30 1.30 5 249 249 51 62 100.6 30.24
10 45.00 50.00 0.11 663 1.15 1.20 5 252 252 51 62 100.3 29.40
11 50.00 55.00 0.10 610 1.10 1.10 5 253 252 53 63 100.4 27.37
12 55.00 60.00 0.08 635 0.86 0.87 4 255 253 54 63 100.4 24.76
B1 60.00 65.00 0.16 607 1.77 1.80 5 255 255 51 64 99.7 34.57
2 65.00 70.00 0.14 580 1.59 1.60 5 250 253 52 65 100.1 31.92
3 70.00 75.00 0.14 760 1.36 1.40 5 251 250 53 66 100.5 34.58
4 75.00 80.00 0.13 604 1.45 1.50 5 251 249 54 66 99.8 31.11
5 80.00 85.00 0.15 587 1.70 1.70 5 253 245 55 67 100.7 33.15
6 85.00 90.00 0.13 709 1.33 1.30 5 251 251 55 67 100.2 32.61
7 90.00 95.00 0.12 563 1.40 1.40 5 250 249 55 67 100.1 29.31
8 95.00 100.00 0.12 634 1.31 1.30 5 251 253 55 68 100.2 30.31
9 100.00 105.00 0.12 677 1.26 1.30 5 254 253 56 68 99.7 30.90
10 105.00 110.00 0.10 590 1.14 1.10 5 255 250 57 69 100.6 27.11
11 110.00 115.00 0.09 563 1.06 1.10 4 254 250 57 68 100.3 25.38
12 115.00 120.00 0.10 757 0.99 1.00 4 250 251 58 67 100.3 29.19
12 120.00 125.00 0.10 542 1.20 1.20 5 253 251 58 68 100.7 26.48
11 125.00 130.00 0.08 738 0.80 0.80 4 251 250 58 68 100.5 25.90
10 130.00 135.00 0.12 673 1.28 1.30 5 254 250 59 69 100.1 30.85
9 135.00 140.00 0.13 636 1.43 1.40 5 255 254 60 69 100.4 31.58
8 140.00 145.00 0.13 674 1.39 1.40 5 252 253 61 69 99.7 32.12
7 145.00 150.00 0.15 385 2.15 2.20 7 251 251 57 65 106.7 29.78
Final DGM:
MaxVac %ISO BWS
150.0 min 108.981 ft3 0.12 in. WC 77.6 °F 611.0 °F 7 1.369 in. WC 100.3 0.041
Gas Temperatures (°F)
82
83
83
85
85
84
11.392
71
73
80
89
87
88
75
79
75
60
77
76
90
Vs(fps)
PumpVac
(in. Hg)
Orifice Press.ΔH (in. WC)
Sa
m
p
l
e

Pt
.
Gas Temperatures (°F)
DGM Average
Amb.
Sample Time(minutes)Dry Gas Meter Reading
(ft3)
75
74
75
75
376.610
57
64
64
346.830
342.909
365.665
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
STACK DATA (EST)
M5-2600
Run 1
8:50
11:32Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
STACK DATA (EST)EQUIPMENT MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
83.2
K-FACTOR
STACK DATA (FINAL)FILTER NO.
Parameter:10/1/24
0.989
1.741
Meter Box ID:
Y:
0.5
YqaΔHTsΔPTm
446.975
433.135
439.510
435.960
RE
S
U
L
T
S
451.890
VmRun Time
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
Nozzle ID:
Nozzle Dn (in.):
409.190
Liner Material:
361.985
Pitot TubeΔP
(in WC)
394.140
405.595
369.335
350.635
386.122
354.680
401.505
373.065
Pitot ID:
397.775
390.230
383.225
443.285
glass
1803796.0
429.680
419.975
423.335
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):0.390
73
379.950
416.470
81
% ISO
426.560
84
412.885
1803796.0
Pitot Cp/Type:
358.115 71
74
Page 32 of 109
Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Start Time:Source:
Date: VALID End Time:Project No.:AST-2024-4545 DF
Moisture:5.0 % est.Est. Tm:78 °F Pb:25.97 in. Hg
Barometric:25.31 in. Hg Est. Ts:611 °F Pg:0.07 in. WC
Static Press:0.07 in. WC Est. ΔP:0.12 in. WC O2:15.83 %
Stack Press:25.32 in. Hg Est. Dn:0.400 in.CO2:2.59 %
CO2:7.0 %Target Rate:0.75 scfm Check Pt.Initial Final Corr.
O2:14.0 %LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf)--
N2/CO:79.0 %0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm):0.001 ------0.002 Mid 2 (cf)--
Md:29.68 lb/lb-mole Gl.35 glass Vacuum (in Hg):15 ------10 Mid 3 (cf)--
Ms:29.10 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:Pass ------Pass --
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit NA
Amb.Amb.Amb.Amb.Amb.
Begin End --Ideal Actual --------
A1 0.00 5.00 0.16 691 1.13 1.10 4 250 254 62 40 101.0 35.90
2 5.00 10.00 0.10 272 1.13 1.10 4 250 254 57 43 100.2 22.63
3 10.00 15.00 0.15 509 1.27 1.30 4 253 254 52 45 101.3 31.89
4 15.00 20.00 0.15 556 1.21 1.20 4 255 256 50 46 101.6 32.66
5 20.00 25.00 0.16 552 1.29 1.30 4 253 253 50 46 101.7 33.66
6 25.00 30.00 0.17 610 1.30 1.30 4 255 251 51 46 99.8 35.68
7 30.00 35.00 0.11 424 1.02 1.00 3 251 254 51 47 100.5 26.09
8 35.00 40.00 0.15 673 1.09 1.10 3 253 255 52 47 100.7 34.49
9 40.00 45.00 0.16 685 1.15 1.20 4 254 254 53 47 101.9 35.81
10 45.00 50.00 0.15 585 1.18 1.20 4 247 251 54 48 100.5 33.12
11 50.00 55.00 0.14 737 0.96 1.00 3 250 253 55 49 99.9 34.25
12 55.00 60.00 0.16 618 1.22 1.20 4 255 251 56 47 100.4 34.74
B1 60.00 65.00 0.15 640 1.12 1.10 4 256 254 57 48 100.0 33.98
2 65.00 70.00 0.09 461 0.80 0.80 3 248 255 55 49 101.2 24.09
3 70.00 75.00 0.16 718 1.12 1.10 4 255 256 50 50 99.9 36.32
4 75.00 80.00 0.14 760 0.94 0.95 3 255 255 50 48 99.7 34.58
5 80.00 85.00 0.14 729 0.97 0.97 3 253 251 50 47 101.1 34.13
6 85.00 90.00 0.13 684 0.94 0.94 3 255 253 50 45 101.0 32.26
7 90.00 95.00 0.13 662 0.95 0.96 3 253 251 50 44 100.5 31.95
8 95.00 100.00 0.12 591 0.94 0.94 3 254 253 51 45 100.4 29.71
9 100.00 105.00 0.15 670 1.09 1.10 4 251 254 51 46 100.1 34.44
10 105.00 110.00 0.16 656 1.18 1.20 5 253 255 52 46 100.8 35.35
11 110.00 115.00 0.15 653 1.11 1.10 5 255 251 52 47 100.5 34.18
12 115.00 120.00 0.11 670 0.80 0.80 4 253 253 52 47 101.2 29.50
12 120.00 125.00 0.10 746 0.69 0.70 4 255 251 52 47 100.7 29.05
11 125.00 130.00 0.14 740 0.97 1.00 4 250 250 53 48 100.6 34.29
10 130.00 135.00 0.15 640 1.13 1.10 4 251 250 53 49 100.3 33.98
9 135.00 140.00 0.14 708 1.00 1.00 4 250 250 53 50 103.0 33.83
8 140.00 145.00 0.15 744 1.04 1.10 4 250 251 54 50 100.6 35.55
7 145.00 150.00 0.16 647 1.21 1.20 4 253 255 54 51 101.1 35.21
6 150.00 155.00 0.15 664 1.11 1.10 4 254 250 55 51 99.9 34.35
5 155.00 160.00 0.15 710 1.07 1.10 4 250 249 56 52 100.7 35.05
4 160.00 165.00 0.13 744 0.90 0.90 3 251 255 56 52 100.4 33.10
3 165.00 170.00 0.12 632 0.92 0.90 3 253 256 56 53 101.5 30.28
2 170.00 175.00 0.11 501 0.96 0.95 3 250 253 57 53 99.8 27.20
1 175.00 180.00 0.10 450 0.92 0.90 3 250 255 58 53 100.3 25.24
Final DGM:03+
MaxVac %ISO BWS
180.0 min 112.995 ft3 0.14 in. WC 90.4 °F 631.4 °F 5 1.053 in. WC 100.4 0.042
158.625
78.465
84.765
88.143
91.370
81.785
100.280
94.125
97.335
103.310
106.285
136.750
109.275
124.760
127.310
130.335
146.515
155.625
89
89
97
98
98
88
90
89
89
87
88
89
89
90
89
89
48.583
68.875
61.910
65.420
51.835
58.525
55.070
112.240
118.765
115.425
ΔP
161.578
121.995
149.710
133.600
86
85
85
75.150
71.960
90
92
87
139.885
152.635
143.285
98
11:48
K-FACTOR
STACK DATA (EST)
Dry Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
EQUIPMENT
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
Vs(fps)
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC10/1/24
STACK DATA (EST)
M5-9
Sample Time
(minutes)
Nozzle Dn (in.):
% ISO
Nozzle ID:
14:56
STACK DATA (FINAL)
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):
Run 2 Parameter:
Meter Box ID:
Sa
m
p
l
e

Pt
.
RE
S
U
L
T
S
Run Time
0.8
Vm ΔH Yqa
PumpVac(in. Hg)
Gas Temperatures (°F)
87
86
83
87
TsTm
93
97
94
95
95
96
96
88
88
Liner Material:
Gas Temperatures (°F)
7.52
Pitot ID:
Pitot Cp/Type:
0.350
Pr-706-4
Pitot Tube
ΔP
(in WC)
Pr-706-4
glass
Orifice Press.
ΔH
(in. WC)
DGM Average
Amb.
--
MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
87.4
FILTER NO.
Y:
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
0.998
1.824
Page 33 of 109
Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Start Time:Source:
Date: VALID End Time:Project No.:AST-2024-4545 DF
Moisture:5.0 % est.Est. Tm:90 °F Pb:25.26 in. Hg
Barometric:25.31 in. Hg Est. Ts:631 °F Pg:0.07 in. WC
Static Press:0.07 in. WC Est. ΔP:0.14 in. WC O2:14.04 %
Stack Press:25.32 in. Hg Est. Dn:0.385 in.CO2:4.03 %
CO2:7.0 %Target Rate:0.75 scfm Check Pt.Initial Final Corr.
O2:14.0 %LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf)--
N2/CO:79.0 %0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm):0.001 ------0.001 Mid 2 (cf)--
Md:29.68 lb/lb-mole GL.39 glass Vacuum (in Hg):15 ------8 Mid 3 (cf)--
Ms:29.10 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:Pass ------Pass --
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit NA
Amb.Amb.Amb.Amb.Amb.
Begin End --Ideal Actual --------
A1 0.00 5.00 0.16 608 1.80 1.80 5 250 253 49 50 101.0 34.58
2 5.00 10.00 0.13 676 1.40 1.40 5 251 250 48 50 100.4 32.15
3 10.00 15.00 0.14 528 1.73 1.70 5 256 260 48 50 100.5 31.11
4 15.00 20.00 0.15 622 1.69 1.70 5 251 250 48 51 99.6 33.70
5 20.00 25.00 0.13 625 1.46 1.50 5 253 249 49 51 100.6 31.42
6 25.00 30.00 0.10 370 1.47 1.50 5 251 250 49 52 100.9 24.10
7 30.00 35.00 0.12 608 1.38 1.40 5 253 248 50 52 100.8 29.95
8 35.00 40.00 0.14 656 1.54 1.60 5 253 251 50 52 101.4 33.07
9 40.00 45.00 0.13 605 1.50 1.50 5 255 253 50 52 100.5 31.13
10 45.00 50.00 0.16 665 1.75 1.80 5 252 251 51 53 100.2 35.49
11 50.00 55.00 0.15 579 1.78 1.80 5 253 246 51 53 100.6 33.03
12 55.00 60.00 0.15 801 1.47 1.50 5 255 244 50 54 100.4 36.39
B1 60.00 65.00 0.15 616 1.66 1.70 5 250 251 50 54 100.5 33.61
2 65.00 70.00 0.17 686 1.77 1.80 5 251 252 51 54 100.1 36.93
3 70.00 75.00 0.16 730 1.61 1.60 5 253 250 52 55 101.0 36.51
4 75.00 80.00 0.15 708 1.54 1.50 5 255 253 53 55 100.7 35.02
5 80.00 85.00 0.16 640 1.74 1.75 5 250 250 55 55 99.7 35.10
6 85.00 90.00 0.17 660 1.82 1.80 5 250 248 56 55 100.6 36.51
7 90.00 95.00 0.16 698 1.66 1.60 5 251 252 57 56 100.4 36.01
8 95.00 100.00 0.15 635 1.65 1.70 5 250 247 58 56 100.5 33.91
9 100.00 105.00 0.13 557 1.55 1.60 5 250 254 59 57 101.2 30.42
10 105.00 110.00 0.14 636 1.55 1.60 5 251 256 59 57 100.9 32.77
11 110.00 115.00 0.13 596 1.49 1.50 5 253 250 59 58 101.0 31.00
12 115.00 120.00 0.15 635 1.66 1.70 5 250 251 59 59 100.3 33.91
12 120.00 125.00 0.09 397 1.25 1.30 4 251 258 54 57 102.4 23.23
11 125.00 130.00 0.13 605 1.46 1.50 5 251 254 56 57 103.1 31.13
10 130.00 135.00 0.11 614 1.25 1.30 5 253 255 57 58 100.7 28.76
9 135.00 140.00 0.13 584 1.52 1.50 5 255 251 55 58 100.3 30.82
8 140.00 145.00 0.15 638 1.67 1.70 5 254 256 56 59 100.3 33.95
7 145.00 150.00 0.15 628 1.69 1.70 5 251 249 55 60 100.9 33.80
6 150.00 155.00 0.16 644 1.78 1.80 5 253 250 54 52 99.7 35.16
5 155.00 160.00 0.14 570 1.66 1.70 5 251 246 55 53 100.4 31.77
4 160.00 165.00 0.15 647 1.66 1.70 5 250 250 55 53 99.9 34.09
3 165.00 170.00 0.16 667 1.74 1.80 5 255 251 56 55 100.8 35.53
2 170.00 175.00 0.15 636 1.67 1.70 5 254 253 56 55 100.5 33.92
1 175.00 180.00 0.14 752 1.41 1.40 5 253 250 56 56 100.7 34.46
1 180.00 185.00 0.08 317 1.26 1.30 5 250 250 57 56 100.6 20.86
2 185.00 190.00 0.12 538 1.46 1.50 5 253 251 58 55 100.4 28.95
3 190.00 195.00 0.15 605 1.72 1.70 5 255 253 58 55 99.8 33.44
4 195.00 200.00 0.15 695 1.58 1.60 5 251 252 59 57 100.2 34.82
5 200.00 205.00 0.15 745 1.52 1.50 5 251 249 59 53 100.6 35.57
6 205.00 210.00 0.07 397 0.99 1.00 4 253 251 52 51 101.1 20.49
7 210.00 215.00 0.09 366 1.32 1.33 5 253 250 52 52 100.2 22.81
8 215.00 220.00 0.14 547 1.69 1.70 5 250 247 53 52 100.2 31.41
9 220.00 225.00 0.06 362 0.89 0.90 4 250 250 54 53 99.9 18.58
10 225.00 230.00 0.07 341 1.06 1.10 5 251 252 54 55 100.6 19.81
11 230.00 235.00 0.08 336 1.22 1.20 5 253 251 55 55 100.4 21.11
Final DGM:
Max
Vac %ISO BWS
235.0 min 183.783 ft3 0.13 in. WC 91.0 °F 590.9 °F 5 1.553 in. WC 98.3 0.034
626.820
629.775633.030
99
97
516.660
520.770
508.765
525.020
488.290
504.615
512.760
500.590
496.735
492.485
89
99
529.075
533.130
456.975
608.055
612.030
615.930
93
619.105
622.730
90
91
92
95
94
95
93
95
548.985
544.915
572.135
556.435
95576.335
541.035
563.895
PumpVac(in. Hg)
STACK DATA (FINAL)
11.115
FILTER NO.
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):
81
% ISO
79
Vs(fps)
Orifice Press.
ΔH
(in. WC)
Gas Temperatures (°F)
93
Gas Temperatures (°F)
1803796.0
1.741
glass
1803796
98
86
96
94
94
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC10/2/24 Run 3
STACK DATA (EST)
M5-2600
Nozzle ID:
Nozzle Dn (in.):
Sa
m
p
l
e

Pt
.
Sample Time
(minutes)
Dry Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)--
0.390
EQUIPMENT
Meter Box ID:
Y:
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
Liner Material:
Pitot ID:
Pitot Cp/Type:
0.989
DGM Average
Amb.
Pitot Tube
ΔP
(in WC)
15:37
K-FACTOR
MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
111.9
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
STACK DATA (EST)
Parameter:
11:36
452.730
480.420
476.685
468.975
472.815
464.885
484.395
460.715
537.085
552.555
603.935
588.680
95580.425
584.485
93
95
95
93
93
592.785
600.110
596.555
567.990
92
559.985
96
96
95
-1.0
ΔHVm YqaΔPTmTs
82
90
89
83
90
81
90
88
89
91
RE
S
U
L
T
S
Run Time
86
83
85
80
89
636.513
Page 34 of 109
Visible Emissions Evaluations
Project No.
Facility Name
Facility Location min 0 15 30 45 min 0 15 30 45
Date 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0
Observation No.1 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 0
Source of Emissions 2 15 10 10 10 32 0 0 0 0
Stack Height 20 ft 3 5 5 5 5 33 0 0 0 0
Distance from Source 60 ft 4 0 5 5 0 34 0 0 0 0
Direction from Source East 5 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 80
6 0 0 0 0 36 80 80 80 75
Time 7 0 5 0 0 37 45 20 20 25
Wind Direction (From)8 0 0 0 0 38 15 10 5 5
Wind Speed 3 mph 6 mph 9 0 0 0 0 39 5 10 10 10
Ambient Temperature 51 °F 59 °F 10 0 0 0 0 40 5 5 10 10
Sky Conditions 11 0 0 0 0 41 10 10 10 5
Color of Background 12 0 0 0 0 42 10 10 10 10
Plume Color 13 0 0 0 0 43 10 10 15 10
Steam Plume? (y/n)14 0 0 0 0 44 15 15 15 15
Attached to Stack? (y/n)15 0 0 0 0 45 10 15 10 10
16 0 0 0 0 46 15 15 10 10
17 0 0 0 0 47 5 5 10 5
18 0 0 0 0 48 10 10 5 5
19 0 0 0 0 49 5 5 5 5
20 0 0 0 0 50 5 5 10 5
21 0 0 0 0 51 5 5 5 0
22 0 0 0 0 52 0 5 10 5
23 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 0 54 5 15 15 0
25 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 0
27 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0
The highest six (6) minute rolling average was 26.5 28 0 0 0 0 58 0 5 5 0
Rolling Average > 20%18 29 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 0
Rolling Average > 40%0
Lecture Field
10/1/249/28/24
Aeromet Smoke School
Patrick Doyle
Certification Dates
Certification Agency
End
Hydro
Spanish Fork, UT
10/1/24
blue
8:50
SE
blue
none
none
none
none
no
1
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
AST-2024-4545
clear
9:52
SW
clear
Start
n
Observer's NameAdditional Comments
Observations
Limits:
no plume at beginning or end of run Observer's Signature Patrick Doyle
Page 35 of 109
Visible Emissions Evaluations
Project No.
Facility Name
Facility Location min 0 15 30 45 min 0 15 30 45
Date 0 0 0 0 0 30 15 10 10 15
Observation No.1 0 0 0 0 31 10 10 15 15
Source of Emissions 2 15 15 15 15 32 15 15 10 10
Stack Height 20 ft 3 0 0 0 0 33 5 5 5 5
Distance from Source 60 ft 4 0 0 0 0 34 5 10 10 5
Direction from Source S 5 0 0 0 0 35 5 0 5 5
6 0 0 0 0 36 5 5 0 0
Time 7 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 5
Wind Direction (From)8 0 0 0 0 38 5 0 0 0
Wind Speed 4 mph 0 mph 9 0 0 0 5 39 0 5 5 5
Ambient Temperature 66 °F 70 °F 10 0 5 0 0 40 10 5 0 0
Sky Conditions 11 0 0 0 5 41 0 0 0 5
Color of Background 12 0 0 0 0 42 10 0 0 0
Plume Color 13 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 5 5
Steam Plume? (y/n)14 5 0 0 0 44 5 0 0 0
Attached to Stack? (y/n)15 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 5
16 5 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0
17 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 5 10
18 0 0 0 0 48 15 0 0 0
19 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 5 0
20 0 0 0 0 50 5 0 0 0
21 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 5 5
22 0 0 0 0 52 5 0 0 0
23 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0
25 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 0 56 5 0 0 0
27 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 5
The highest six (6) minute rolling average was 11.9 28 0 0 15 15 58 5 0 0 0
Rolling Average > 20%0 29 20 20 15 15 59 0 0 0 0
Rolling Average > 40%0
Lecture Field
W WNW
AST-2024-4545 Observations
Hydro
Spanish Fork, UT
10/1/24
2
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
Start End
11:48 12:49
clear clear
blue blue
none none
none no
none n
Additional Comments Patrick Doyle
wind chnged directions a few times and plume changed color during run Observer's Signature
Certification Agency Aeromet Smoke School
Observer's Name
Limits:Certification Dates 9/28/24 10/1/24
Patrick Doyle
Page 36 of 109
Visible Emissions Evaluations
Project No.
Facility Name
Facility Location min 0 15 30 45 min 0 15 30 45
Date 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 5 5 5
Observation No.1 0 0 0 0 31 5 5 5 5
Source of Emissions 2 0 0 0 0 32 5 5 5 5
Stack Height 20 ft 3 0 0 0 0 33 5 5 5 5
Distance from Source 60 ft 4 0 0 0 0 34 5 5 5 5
Direction from Source NE 5 0 0 0 0 35 5 5 5 5
6 0 0 0 0 36 5 5 5 0
Time 7 0 0 0 0 37 0 5 0 0
Wind Direction (From)8 0 0 0 0 38 0 5 5 5
Wind Speed 1 mph 3 mph 9 0 0 0 0 39 5 5 5 0
Ambient Temperature 67 °F 71 °F 10 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 5 5
Sky Conditions 11 0 0 0 0 41 5 0 0 0
Color of Background 12 0 0 0 0 42 5 5 0 0
Plume Color 13 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0
Steam Plume? (y/n)14 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 5
Attached to Stack? (y/n)15 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0
16 0 0 0 0 46 5 5 5 0
17 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 0 48 5 5 0 0
19 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 5 0
21 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 5 0
23 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0
24 5 15 30 35 54 0 0 5 0
25 35 35 30 0 55 0 0 0 0
26 15 15 15 15 56 0 0 0 0
27 15 10 10 5 57 0 0 0 0
The highest six (6) minute rolling average was 13.5 28 5 5 5 5 58 0 0 0 0
Rolling Average > 20%0 29 5 5 5 5 59 0 0 0 0
Rolling Average > 40%0
Lecture Field
W NW
AST-2024-4545 Observations
Hydro
Spanish Fork, UT
10/2/24
3
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
Start End
11:36 12:36
clear clear
blue blue
none none
none none
none none
Additional Comments Patrick Doyle
Observer's Signature
Certification Agency Aeromet Smoke School
Observer's Name
Limits:Certification Dates 9/28/24 10/1/24
Patrick Doyle
Page 37 of 109
Condition 2
Page 38 of 109
Method 1 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date:
Vertical
Circular
67.75 in
6.00 in
61.75 in
20.80 ft2
2
4.8 ft
0.9 (must be ≥ 0.5)
15.0 ft
2.9 (must be ≥ 2)24
24
1
Measurer (Initial and Date):ALB 9/30
Reviewer (Initial and Date):SPR 9/30
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 14.6 --6.7 --4.4 --3.2 --2.6 --2.1 1 2.1 1.30 7 5/16
2 85.4 --25.0 --14.6 --10.5 --8.2 --6.7 2 6.7 4.14 10 1/8
3 ----75.0 --29.6 --19.4 --14.6 --11.8 3 11.8 7.29 13 5/16
4 ----93.3 --70.4 --32.3 --22.6 --17.7 4 17.7 10.93 16 15/16
5 --------85.4 --67.7 --34.2 --25.0 5 25.0 15.44 21 7/16
6 --------95.6 --80.6 --65.8 --35.6 6 35.6 21.98 28
7 ------------89.5 --77.4 --64.4 7 64.4 39.77 45 3/4
8 ------------96.8 --85.4 --75.0 8 75.0 46.31 52 5/16
9 ----------------91.8 --82.3 9 82.3 50.82 56 13/16
10 ----------------97.4 --88.2 10 88.2 54.46 60 7/16
11 --------------------93.3 11 93.3 57.61 63 5/8
12 --------------------97.9 12 97.9 60.45 66 7/16
*Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point.
A =4.75 ft.
B =15 ft.
Depth of Duct =61.75 in.
Number of traverse points on a diameter
Stack Diagram
Cross Sectional Area
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Traverse Point % of Diameter
Distance from inside wall
Distance from outside of port
No. of Test Ports:
Number of Readings per Point:
Distance A:
Distance A Duct Diameters:
Distance B:
Distance B Duct Diameters:
Minimum Number of Traverse Points:
Actual Number of Traverse Points:
CIRCULAR DUCT
Duct Design:
Nipple Length:
Depth of Duct:
Cross Sectional Area of Duct:
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port:
Duct Orientation:
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2
AST-2024-4545
10/02/24
Stack Parameters
Upstream Disturbance
Downstream
Disturbance
B
A
Page 39 of 109
Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Source Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2
Project No.AST-2024-4545
Date 10/02/24
Sample Point Angle (ΔP=0)
1 5
2 0
3 0
4 5
5 8
6 6
7 4
8 4
9 0
10 7
11 2
12 1
13 3
14 5
15 3
16 0
17 5
18 5
19 0
20 0
21 5
22 0
23 0
24 5
Average 3
Page 40 of 109
Emission Calculations
Location
SourceProject No.
Parameter
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 10/2/24 10/3/24 10/3/24 --
Start Time 16:16 8:31 12:15 --
Stop Time 19:26 11:55 15:05 --
Run Time, min (θ)186.0 190.0 160.0 178.7
2,3,7,8-TCDD Mass, pg 173 283 320 258.7
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD Mass, pg 774 1440 1070 1094.7
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD Mass, pg 514 1040 514 689.3
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD Mass, pg 934 1470 828 1077.3
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD Mass, pg 1700 3100 1670 2156.7
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD Mass, pg 2620 4410 1690 2906.7
OCDD Mass, pg 1830 3110 1020 1986.7
Other TCDD Mass, pg 7530 15400 13900 12276.7
Other PeCDD Mass, pg 10400 19100 13900 14466.7
Other HxCDD Mass, pg 11200 17200 8920 12440.0
Other HpCDD Mass, pg 5380 8890 3220 5830.0
2,3,7,8-TCDF Mass, pg 807 1820 1610 1412.3
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF Mass, pg 1010 1760 1460 1410.0
2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF Mass, pg 2410 3950 2820 3060.0
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF Mass, pg 2710 4710 2220 3213.3
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF Mass, pg 988 1920 1040 1316.0
2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF Mass, pg 2470 2810 1170 2150.0
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF Mass, pg 210 280 136 208.7
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF Mass, pg 1530 3830 1420 2260.0
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF Mass, pg 384 622 268 424.7
OCDF Mass, pg 618 897 366 627.0
Other TCDF Mass, pg 18000 37400 38900 31433.3
Other PeCDF Mass, pg 13100 27700 20400 20400.0
Other HxCDF Mass, pg 9630 16600 8610 11613.3
Other HpCDF Mass, pg 2730 6100 2340 3723.3
Italicized values were flagged by the laboratory. See laboratory report in Appendix C for details.
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2AST-2024-4545
D/F
INPUT DATA
Page 41 of 109
Emission Calculations
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 10/2/24 10/3/24 10/3/24 --
Start Time 16:16 8:31 12:15 --
Stop Time 19:26 11:55 15:05 --
Run Duration, min 190 204 170 188.0
Feed Rate, ton/hr (FR)14.5 14.5 15.6 14.8
Feed Rate, lb/hr (FR)28,933 29,047 31,119 29,700
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)25.31 25.31 25.35 25.32
Meter Correction Factor (Y)0.998 0.989 0.989 --
Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @)1.824 1.741 1.741 --
Meter Volume, ft3 (Vm)138.398 147.002 123.537 136.312
Meter Temperature, °F (Tm)92.3 73.1 88.5 84.7
Meter Temperature, °R (Tm)552.0 532.8 548.2 544.3
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (ΔH)1.480 1.561 1.514 1.518
Volume H2O Collected, mL (Vlc)70.6 77.4 68.0 72.0
Nozzle Diameter, in (Dn)0.390 0.390 0.390 0.390
Area of Nozzle, ft2 (An)0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008
D/F TEQ TEQ Mass, pg (MD/F)(TEF)2,896.6 4,873.6 3,292.0 3,687.4
2,3,7,8-TCDD TEQ Mass, pg 1 173.0 283.0 320.0 258.7
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD TEQ Mass, pg 0.5 387.0 720.0 535.0 547.3
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 51.4 104.0 51.4 68.9
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 93.4 147.0 82.8 107.7
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 170.0 310.0 167.0 215.7
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD TEQ Mass, pg 0.01 26.2 44.1 16.9 29.1
OCDD TEQ Mass, pg 0.001 1.8 3.1 1.0 2.0
2,3,7,8-TCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 80.7 182.0 161.0 141.2
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.05 50.5 88.0 73.0 70.5
2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.5 1,205.0 1,975.0 1,410.0 1,530.0
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 271.0 471.0 222.0 321.3
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 98.8 192.0 104.0 131.6
2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 247.0 281.0 117.0 215.0
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.1 21.0 28.0 13.6 20.9
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.01 15.3 38.3 14.2 22.6
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.01 3.8 6.2 2.7 4.2
OCDF TEQ Mass, pg 0.001 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.6
Standard Meter Volume, ft3 (Vmstd)112.177 122.352 100.077 111.535
Standard Water Volume, ft3 (Vwstd)3.329 3.650 3.207 3.396
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd)0.029 0.029 0.031 0.030
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat)1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Moisture Fraction (BWS)0.029 0.029 0.031 0.030
Meter Pressure, in Hg (Pm)25.42 25.42 25.46 25.43
Volume at Nozzle, ft3 (Vn)286.487 293.762 235.585 271.945
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, (%)(I)99.0 98.2 98.2 98.5
DGM Calibration Check Value, (+/- 5%)(Yqa)0.0 -0.7 -0.6 -0.4
D/F TEQ Concentration, grain/dscf (CDF)4.0E-10 6.1E-10 5.1E-10 5.1E-10
D/F TEQ Concentration, ng/ft3 (CD/F)2.6E-02 4.0E-02 3.3E-02 3.3E-02
D/F TEQ Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERD/F)5.2E-08 8.7E-08 6.9E-08 6.9E-08
D/F TEQ Emission Factor, ug/MG (EFD/F)1.80 2.98 2.23 2.34
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2
AST-2024-4545
D/F
INPUT DATA
ISOKINETIC DATA
Page 42 of 109
Flow Information
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 10/2/24 10/3/24 10/3/24 --
Start Time 16:16 8:31 12:15 --
Stop Time 19:26 11:55 15:05 --
Run Time, min 186.0 190.0 160.0 178.7
Point 1 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.13
Point 2 0.06 0.14 0.13 0.11
Point 3 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.13
Point 4 0.09 0.14 0.16 0.13
Point 5 0.11 0.15 0.15 0.14
Point 6 0.15 0.17 0.15 0.16
Point 7 0.12 0.18 0.16 0.15
Point 8 0.11 0.16 0.17 0.15
Point 9 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14
Point 10 0.13 0.10 0.15 0.13
Point 11 0.15 0.09 0.12 0.12
Point 12 0.14 0.11 0.10 0.12
Point 13 0.12 0.08 0.13 0.11
Point 14 0.08 0.16 0.11 0.12
Point 15 0.10 0.15 0.10 0.12
Point 16 0.13 0.15 0.11 0.13
Point 17 0.15 0.16 0.09 0.13
Point 18 0.16 0.15 0.07 0.13
Point 19 0.15 0.14 0.09 0.13
Point 20 0.14 0.13 0.08 0.12
Point 21 0.11 0.12 0.10 0.11
Point 22 0.13 0.10 0.11 0.11
Point 23 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.12
Point 24 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.14
Square Root of ΔP, (in. WC)1/2 (ΔP) 0.354 0.369 0.355 0.359
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.840
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb) 25.31 25.31 25.35 25.32
Static Pressure, in. WC (Pg) 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Stack Pressure, in. Hg (Ps) 25.32 25.32 25.36 25.33
Stack Cross-sectional Area, ft2 (As) 20.80 20.80 20.80 20.80
Stack Temperature, °F (Ts) 647.7 581.3 560.3 596.4
Stack Temperature, °R (Ts) 1107.4 1040.9 1020.0 1056.1
Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.029 0.029 0.031 0.030
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.029 0.029 0.031 0.030
O2 Concentration, %(O2)14.02 15.13 15.14 14.76
CO2 Concentration, %(CO2)4.02 3.27 3.26 3.52
N2 Concentration, %(N2)81.96 81.6 81.6 81.72
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry) (Md) 29.20 29.13 29.13 29.15
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet) (Ms) 28.88 28.81 28.78 28.82
Velocity, ft/sec (Vs) 31.3 31.6 30.1 31.0
At Stack Conditions, acfm (Qa) 39,009 39,468 37,576 38,684
At Standard Conditions, scfm (Qsw) 15,727 16,928 16,473 16,376
At Standard Conditions, dscfm (Qs)15,274 16,437 15,961 15,891
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2
AST-2024-4545
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
CALCULATED DATA
VELOCITY HEAD, in. WC
D/F
Page 43 of 109
Alt-153 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date
O₂CO₂O₂CO₂Make Servomex Servomex Span Value 23.99 23.90Model49004900Initial Instr. Zero Cal Response 0.00 -0.04S/N 100269 100269 Initial Instr. Upscale Cal Response 11.00 11.20Operating Range 25 100 Pretest System Zero Response 0.00 0.00Cylinder ID Posttest System Zero Response 0.00 -0.01ZeroNANAPretest System Upscale Response 10.93 11.14MidRR02538RR02538Posttest System Upscale Response 10.93 11.11HighEB0069884EB0069884Bias (%)Actual Concentration (% or ppm)Bias Criteria 5.00 5.00Zero0.00 0.00 Pretest Zero 0.00 0.17Mid11.00 10.90 Posttest Zero 0.00 0.13
High 23.99 23.90 Pretest Span -0.29 -0.25Instrument Response (% or ppm)Posttest Span -0.29 -0.38Zero0.00 -0.04 Drift (%)Mid 11.00 11.20 Drift Criteria 3.00 3.00High24.00 23.92 Zero 0.00 -0.04Performance (% of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)Mid 0.00 -0.13
Zero 0.00 0.17Mid0.00 1.26High0.04 0.08Performance CriteriaZero 2.00 2.00Mid2.00 2.00
High 2.00 2.00StatusZeroPASSPASSMidPASSPASSHighPASSPASS
10 seconds
O₂CO₂O₂CO₂O₂CO₂Time % dry % dry Time % dry % dry Time % dry % dry13:55:15 14.02 4.02 13:58:05 15.07 3.26 14:00:05 15.14 3.2413:55:25 14.02 4.03 13:58:15 15.13 3.26 14:00:15 15.14 3.25
13:55:35 14.02 4.02 13:58:25 15.14 3.27 14:00:25 15.14 3.2513:55:45 14.02 4.04 13:58:35 15.15 3.28 14:00:35 15.14 3.2813:55:55 14.02 4.02 13:58:45 15.15 3.25 14:00:45 15.14 3.2613:56:05 14.02 4.01 13:58:55 15.15 3.28 14:00:55 15.14 3.29Average14.02 4.02 Average 15.13 3.27 Average 15.14 3.26
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2
AST-2024-4545
10/3/24
Parameter Parameter
Instrument Reading Interval
Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
Page 44 of 109
Method 4 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
Analysis
Run 1 Date:10/2/24
Impinger No.1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O Empty Silica --
Initial Mass, g 360.1 498.0 759.5 747.6 643.0 903.4 3911.6
Final Mass, g 375.2 531.0 757.3 755.4 644.0 919.3 3982.2
Gain 15.1 33.0 -2.2 7.8 1.0 15.9 70.6
Run 2 Date:10/3/24
Impinger No.1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O Empty Silica --
Initial Mass, g 379.3 555.1 718.0 761.8 653.4 976.8 4044.4
Final Mass, g 398.6 595.4 716.1 768.8 654.6 988.3 4121.8
Gain 19.3 40.3 -1.9 7.0 1.2 11.5 77.4
Run 3 Date:10/3/24
Impinger No.1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
Contents XAD Trap Empty H2O H2O Empty Silica --
Initial Mass, g 366.5 531.0 757.3 755.4 644.0 919.3 3973.5
Final Mass, g 379.5 545.0 752.5 783.0 647.7 933.8 4041.5
Gain 13.0 14.0 -4.8 27.6 3.7 14.5 68.0
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2
AST-2024-4545
D/F
Gravimetric
Page 45 of 109
Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Start Time:Source:
Date: VALID End Time:Project No.:AST-2024-4545 D/F
Moisture:5.0 % est.Est. Tm:85 °F Pb:25.31 in. Hg
Barometric:25.26 in. Hg Est. Ts:594 °F Pg:0.07 in. WC
Static Press:0.07 in. WC Est. ΔP:0.13 in. WC O2:14.02 %
Stack Press:25.27 in. Hg Est. Dn:0.386 in.CO2:4.02 %
CO2:7.0 %Target Rate:0.75 scfm Check Pt.Initial Final Corr.
O2:14.0 %LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf)--
N2/CO:79.0 %0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm):0.001 ------0.001 Mid 2 (cf)--
Md:29.68 lb/lb-mole Gl.39 glass Vacuum (in Hg):15 ------10 Mid 3 (cf)--
Ms:29.10 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:Pass ------Pass --
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit NA
Amb.Amb.Amb.Amb.Amb.
Begin End 89 Ideal Actual 90 90 90 90
1 0.00 5.00 0.14 622 1.64 1.70 5 251 253 49 52 100.5 32.59
2 5.00 10.00 0.06 303 1.00 1.00 4 253 252 50 51 100.3 17.92
3 10.00 15.00 0.10 382 1.52 1.50 5 251 255 50 52 100.4 24.30
4 15.00 20.00 0.09 442 1.28 1.30 5 254 256 50 51 100.8 23.86
5 20.00 25.00 0.11 556 1.39 1.40 5 250 255 51 53 100.3 28.00
6 25.00 30.00 0.15 782 1.55 1.60 5 251 256 51 53 100.0 36.15
7 30.00 35.00 0.12 779 1.24 1.30 5 253 254 53 53 100.2 32.29
8 35.00 40.00 0.11 1353 0.78 0.80 3 257 256 53 54 100.5 37.40
9 40.00 45.00 0.14 843 1.36 1.30 5 248 253 54 55 100.7 35.77
10 45.00 50.00 0.13 718 1.40 1.40 5 249 254 53 55 100.4 32.77
11 50.00 55.00 0.15 613 1.77 1.80 5 255 253 53 56 101.5 33.60
12 55.00 60.00 0.14 707 1.52 1.50 5 251 252 54 55 101.3 33.85
B1 60.00 65.00 0.12 726 1.28 1.30 5 255 253 55 56 100.5 31.59
2 65.00 70.00 0.08 605 0.95 0.95 3 251 251 55 57 100.8 24.44
3 70.00 75.00 0.10 623 1.17 1.20 4 252 254 56 58 101.5 27.56
4 75.00 80.00 0.13 592 1.56 1.60 5 254 251 58 58 100.7 30.97
5 80.00 85.00 0.15 533 1.91 1.90 5 255 251 59 58 100.1 32.32
6 85.00 90.00 0.16 500 2.11 2.10 6 253 250 59 59 100.8 32.82
7 90.00 95.00 0.15 515 1.95 2.00 6 255 250 61 60 100.9 32.03
8 95.00 100.00 0.14 530 1.80 1.80 5 251 253 62 60 102.0 31.18
9 100.00 105.00 0.11 620 1.30 1.30 5 250 256 62 61 101.2 28.86
10 105.00 110.00 0.13 631 1.52 1.50 5 253 255 63 61 102.1 31.54
11 110.00 115.00 0.12 685 1.34 1.30 5 255 251 65 58 100.4 31.04
12 115.00 120.00 0.13 710 1.42 1.40 5 256 250 65 58 101.9 32.66
12 120.00 125.00 0.07 600 0.85 0.85 3 248 250 59 59 101.2 22.81
11 125.00 130.00 0.10 654 1.15 1.10 4 248 253 54 59 100.7 27.95
10 130.00 135.00 0.12 677 1.35 1.30 5 251 252 54 59 100.2 30.93
9 135.00 140.00 0.15 690 1.67 1.70 5 253 251 54 59 101.3 34.78
8 140.00 145.00 0.16 672 1.81 1.80 5 250 250 55 60 101.4 35.64
7 145.00 150.00 0.15 684 1.68 1.70 5 251 253 58 61 100.7 34.69
6 150.00 155.00 0.12 686 1.35 1.40 5 253 255 52 52 100.7 31.06
5 155.00 160.00 0.15 648 1.74 1.75 5 251 255 53 53 100.0 34.14
4 160.00 165.00 0.14 670 1.59 1.60 5 248 255 54 53 101.6 33.31
3 165.00 170.00 0.13 721 1.42 1.40 5 251 254 54 54 100.4 32.81
2 170.00 175.00 0.13 723 1.42 1.40 5 255 250 54 54 102.6 32.84
1 175.00 180.00 0.15 716 1.64 1.70 5 254 250 54 55 100.5 35.17
2 180.00 186.00 0.15 455 2.11 2.10 6 251 254 55 54 100.5 31.02
Final DGM:
MaxVac %ISO BWS
186.0 min 138.398 ft3 0.13 in. WC 92.3 °F 647.7 °F 6 1.480 in. WC 99.0 0.029
glass
Pr-706-4
316.274
305.195
309.030
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):0.390
96
263.075
301.685
89
% ISO
312.570
91
297.520
Pr-706-4
Pitot Cp/Type:
242.310 95
96
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
Nozzle ID:
Nozzle Dn (in.):
293.235
Liner Material:
245.930
Pitot TubeΔP
(in WC)
277.445
288.790
253.170
235.040
270.995
238.825
284.590
255.895
Pitot ID:
280.775
274.465
267.185
329.990
334.165
338.160
319.120
345.785
325.990
322.425
341.740
RE
S
U
L
T
S
366.448
VmRun Time
353.385
357.135
ΔP Tm
349.720
97
97
98
361.087
0.0
YqaΔHTs
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2
STACK DATA (EST)
M5-9
Run 1
16:16
19:26Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
STACK DATA (EST)EQUIPMENT MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
70.6
K-FACTOR
STACK DATA (FINAL)FILTER NO.
Parameter:10/2/24
0.998
1.824
Meter Box ID:
Y:
Sa
m
p
l
e

Pt
.
Gas Temperatures (°F)
DGM Average
Amb.
Sample Time(minutes)Dry Gas Meter Reading
(ft3)
89
88
89
90
259.465
90
91
94
231.975
228.050
249.745
88
96
95
94
94
97
97
96
87
85
89
86
86
95
Vs(fps)
PumpVac
(in. Hg)
Orifice Press.ΔH (in. WC)
Gas Temperatures (°F)
98
90
90
91
93
94
92
11.941
94
87
Page 46 of 109
Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Start Time:Source:
Date: VALID End Time:Project No.:AST-2024-4545 D/F
Moisture:5.0 % est.Est. Tm:92 °F Pb:25.31 in. Hg
Barometric:25.26 in. Hg Est. Ts:648 °F Pg:0.07 in. WC
Static Press:0.07 in. WC Est. ΔP:0.13 in. WC O2:15.13 %
Stack Press:25.27 in. Hg Est. Dn:0.394 in.CO2:3.27 %
CO2:7.0 %Target Rate:0.75 scfm Check Pt.Initial Final Corr.
O2:14.0 %LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf)--
N2/CO:79.0 %0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm):0.001 ------0.001 Mid 2 (cf)--
Md:29.68 lb/lb-mole Gl.39 glass Vacuum (in Hg):15 ------10 Mid 3 (cf)--
Ms:29.10 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:Pass ------Pass --
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit NA
Amb.Amb.Amb.Amb.Amb.
Begin End --Ideal Actual --------
1 0.00 5.00 0.13 341 1.83 1.80 5 256 254 47 55 100.4 27.02
2 5.00 10.00 0.14 500 1.65 1.70 5 254 251 47 51 101.5 30.70
3 10.00 15.00 0.15 485 1.80 1.80 5 254 252 47 51 100.4 31.53
4 15.00 20.00 0.14 535 1.60 1.60 5 253 252 48 52 100.6 31.26
5 20.00 25.00 0.15 561 1.67 1.70 5 253 251 48 52 100.8 32.77
6 25.00 30.00 0.17 569 1.89 1.90 5 251 250 48 52 101.0 35.03
7 30.00 35.00 0.18 635 1.88 1.90 5 251 248 49 53 100.4 37.18
8 35.00 40.00 0.16 652 1.65 1.70 5 250 252 49 53 100.5 35.32
9 40.00 45.00 0.14 548 1.60 1.60 5 253 253 49 53 101.3 31.46
10 45.00 50.00 0.10 365 1.40 1.40 5 253 251 50 53 101.3 24.05
11 50.00 55.00 0.09 355 1.28 1.30 5 254 250 50 54 100.8 22.68
12 55.00 60.00 0.11 374 1.53 1.50 5 256 253 51 54 100.6 25.36
B1 60.00 65.00 0.08 392 1.09 1.10 4 255 254 51 54 101.3 21.86
2 65.00 70.00 0.16 857 1.42 1.40 5 252 256 51 54 101.0 38.44
3 70.00 75.00 0.15 756 1.44 1.50 5 253 253 51 54 99.7 35.77
4 75.00 80.00 0.15 690 1.53 1.50 5 254 252 52 55 99.5 34.78
5 80.00 85.00 0.16 725 1.59 1.60 5 250 255 53 55 100.7 36.46
6 85.00 90.00 0.15 704 1.52 1.50 5 248 254 54 56 100.5 34.99
7 90.00 95.00 0.14 677 1.45 1.50 5 249 250 55 56 100.5 33.41
8 95.00 100.00 0.13 633 1.40 1.40 5 250 251 56 56 102.8 31.57
9 100.00 105.00 0.12 604 1.33 1.30 5 253 250 57 57 100.8 29.92
10 105.00 110.00 0.10 631 1.09 1.10 4 254 250 58 55 100.6 27.66
11 110.00 115.00 0.11 599 1.23 1.20 5 251 253 60 56 99.6 28.58
12 115.00 120.00 0.14 685 1.45 1.50 5 255 255 61 56 99.9 33.53
12 120.00 125.00 0.15 621 1.65 1.70 5 253 249 53 51 100.3 33.72
11 125.00 130.00 0.15 640 1.63 1.60 5 253 251 54 53 100.6 34.02
10 130.00 135.00 0.11 563 1.29 1.30 5 255 253 51 52 100.6 28.09
9 135.00 140.00 0.13 520 1.59 1.60 5 251 251 51 52 100.5 29.89
8 140.00 145.00 0.14 539 1.68 1.70 5 250 255 52 53 100.8 31.32
7 145.00 150.00 0.14 565 1.64 1.70 5 252 254 52 53 100.4 31.72
6 150.00 155.00 0.13 545 1.55 1.60 5 252 251 52 53 100.5 30.27
5 155.00 160.00 0.16 610 1.80 1.80 5 251 253 52 54 100.1 34.65
4 160.00 165.00 0.15 634 1.65 1.70 5 252 255 52 55 101.2 33.92
3 165.00 170.00 0.15 675 1.59 1.60 5 251 257 53 55 100.3 34.55
2 170.00 175.00 0.14 645 1.53 1.60 5 250 256 54 55 100.5 32.94
1 175.00 180.00 0.12 609 1.36 1.40 5 249 252 55 56 100.8 29.99
2 180.00 185.00 0.15 701 1.56 1.50 3 252 251 53 54 100.6 34.95
3 185.00 190.00 0.13 348 1.95 2.00 6 253 253 53 55 99.9 27.14
Final DGM:
Max
Vac %ISO BWS
190.0 min 147.002 ft3 0.14 in. WC 73.1 °F 581.3 °F 6 1.561 in. WC 98.2 0.029
MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
77.4
FILTER NO.
Y:
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
0.989
1.741
Liner Material:
Gas Temperatures (°F)
10.99
Pitot ID:
Pitot Cp/Type:
0.390
1803796
Pitot Tube
ΔP
(in WC)
1807396.0
glass
Orifice Press.
ΔH
(in. WC)
DGM Average
Amb.
--
RE
S
U
L
T
S
Run Time
-0.7
Vm ΔH Yqa
PumpVac(in. Hg)
Gas Temperatures (°F)
60
58
53
61
TsTm
81
85
82
83
83
84
84
65
71
8:31
K-FACTOR
STACK DATA (EST)
Dry Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
EQUIPMENT
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2
Vs(fps)
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC10/3/24
STACK DATA (EST)
M5-2600
Sample Time
(minutes)
Nozzle Dn (in.):
% ISO
Nozzle ID:
11:55
STACK DATA (FINAL)
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):
Run 2 Parameter:
Meter Box ID:
Sa
m
p
l
e

Pt
.
ΔP
786.265
726.775
762.305
742.125
57
56
54
671.725
667.770
79
81
62
750.165
781.885
766.380
754.185
88
8889
639.263
663.555
655.340
659.320
643.395
651.460
647.365
716.455
723.330
720.065
65
54
86
86
87
65
78
75
67
68
70
73
74
77
75
75
774.245
777.936
675.650
682.846
686.670
689.935
679.340
701.145
693.640
697.340
705.075
708.915
746.085
712.675
730.528
734.555
738.560
758.105
770.345
Page 47 of 109
Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Start Time:Source:
Date: VALID End Time:Project No.:AST-2024-4545 D/F
Moisture:5.0 % est.Est. Tm:73 °F Pb:25.35 in. Hg
Barometric:25.26 in. Hg Est. Ts:581 °F Pg:0.07 in. WC
Static Press:0.07 in. WC Est. ΔP:0.14 in. WC O2:15.14 %
Stack Press:25.27 in. Hg Est. Dn:0.387 in.CO2:3.26 %
CO2:7.0 %Target Rate:0.75 scfm Check Pt.Initial Final Corr.
O2:14.0 %LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf)--
N2/CO:79.0 %0.840 S-type Leak Rate (cfm):0.001 ------0.001 Mid 2 (cf)--
Md:29.68 lb/lb-mole Gl.39 glass Vacuum (in Hg):15 ------10 Mid 3 (cf)--
Ms:29.10 lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:Pass ------Pass --
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit NA
Amb.Amb.Amb.Amb.Amb.
Begin End --Ideal Actual --------
1 0.00 5.00 0.12 331 1.82 1.80 5 251 250 51 54 100.2 25.80
2 5.00 10.00 0.13 472 1.67 1.70 5 251 253 52 54 99.9 29.15
3 10.00 15.00 0.15 544 1.79 1.80 5 253 253 52 54 100.4 32.50
4 15.00 20.00 0.16 592 1.82 1.80 5 251 254 53 54 100.7 34.36
5 20.00 25.00 0.15 536 1.81 1.80 5 250 251 53 55 100.4 32.37
6 25.00 30.00 0.15 549 1.79 1.80 5 251 250 54 55 100.2 32.58
7 30.00 35.00 0.16 513 1.97 2.00 5 254 252 54 56 99.7 33.04
8 35.00 40.00 0.17 545 2.03 2.00 5 253 251 55 56 100.5 34.61
9 40.00 45.00 0.14 629 1.55 1.60 5 253 253 56 57 100.3 32.70
10 45.00 50.00 0.15 663 1.61 1.60 5 255 254 56 58 100.7 34.37
11 50.00 55.00 0.12 671 1.29 1.30 5 254 256 57 59 100.4 30.85
12 55.00 60.00 0.10 654 1.09 1.10 5 256 260 57 59 101.5 27.95
B1 60.00 65.00 0.13 589 1.49 1.50 5 256 251 58 59 100.7 30.92
2 65.00 70.00 0.11 692 1.15 1.20 5 253 254 59 60 99.6 29.81
3 70.00 75.00 0.10 589 1.15 1.20 5 251 253 59 61 100.4 27.12
4 75.00 80.00 0.11 510 1.37 1.40 5 250 250 60 61 100.7 27.35
5 80.00 85.00 0.09 474 1.16 1.20 5 254 254 61 60 101.3 24.28
6 85.00 90.00 0.07 456 0.92 0.95 5 252 248 61 61 100.4 21.20
7 90.00 95.00 0.09 421 1.23 1.20 5 251 253 62 62 100.6 23.58
8 95.00 100.00 0.08 414 1.11 1.10 5 251 255 63 62 100.7 22.14
9 100.00 105.00 0.10 421 1.37 1.40 5 251 254 64 63 99.9 24.86
10 105.00 110.00 0.11 399 1.55 1.50 5 253 249 55 58 101.2 25.74
11 110.00 115.00 0.13 499 1.64 1.60 5 251 252 57 55 101.1 29.57
12 115.00 120.00 0.15 542 1.82 1.70 5 250 250 58 56 100.8 32.47
12 120.00 125.00 0.16 736 1.63 1.60 5 251 253 59 58 100.0 36.63
11 125.00 130.00 0.15 700 1.58 1.60 5 251 251 59 60 99.9 34.93
10 130.00 135.00 0.15 687 1.60 1.60 5 250 252 60 61 100.3 34.74
9 135.00 140.00 0.14 702 1.47 1.50 5 253 248 61 61 102.0 33.78
8 140.00 145.00 0.14 702 1.47 1.50 5 251 249 61 62 100.4 33.78
7 145.00 150.00 0.12 635 1.34 1.40 5 253 256 61 63 100.1 30.36
6 150.00 155.00 0.13 562 1.56 1.60 5 251 255 62 63 100.1 30.52
5 155.00 160.00 0.11 502 1.40 1.40 5 250 251 62 63 99.6 27.24
Final DGM:
MaxVac %ISO BWS
160.0 min 123.537 ft3 0.13 in. WC 88.5 °F 560.3 °F 5 1.514 in. WC 98.2 0.031RE
S
U
L
T
S
Run Time
87
86
87
93
911.567
85
86
90
94
90
88
89
91
-0.6
ΔHVm YqaΔPTmTs
884.475
900.215
892.445
95
96
95
788.030
817.545
813.160
804.745
808.965
800.490
822.035
796.285
868.115
15:05
K-FACTOR
MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
68.0
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2
STACK DATA (EST)
Parameter:
12:15Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC10/3/24 Run 3
STACK DATA (EST)
M5-2600
Nozzle ID:
Nozzle Dn (in.):
Sa
m
p
l
e

Pt
.
Sample Time
(minutes)
Dry Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)--
0.390
EQUIPMENT
Meter Box ID:
Y:
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
Liner Material:
Pitot ID:
Pitot Cp/Type:
0.989
DGM Average
Amb.
Pitot Tube
ΔP
(in WC)
PumpVac(in. Hg)
STACK DATA (FINAL)
11.284
FILTER NO.
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):
85
% ISO
84
Vs(fps)
Orifice Press.
ΔH
(in. WC)
Gas Temperatures (°F)
83
Gas Temperatures (°F)
Pr-706-4
1.741
glass
Pr-706-4
88
83
86
84
84
84
85
94
95
880.445
876.165
903.880
888.440
96907.835
872.085
896.360
89
861.100
864.430
792.250
85
89
87
851.135
854.560
844.075
857.590
825.955
840.730
847.445
836.885
833.555
829.975
Page 48 of 109
Visible Emissions Evaluations
Project No.
Facility Name
Facility Location min 0 15 30 45 min 0 15 30 45
Date 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 5 5 0
Observation No.1 0 20 25 35 31 0 5 0 0
Source of Emissions 2 30 20 15 15 32 0 5 5 5
Stack Height 20 ft 3 10 10 10 10 33 0 5 0 0
Distance from Source 60 ft 4 10 10 10 10 34 0 0 5 5
Direction from Source SW 5 10 10 10 5 35 0 0 0 0
6 5 5 5 5 36 0 0 0 0
Time 7 5 5 5 5 37 0 0 0 0
Wind Direction (From)8 5 5 5 5 38 0 0 0 0
Wind Speed 4 mph 4 mph 9 5 5 5 5 39 0 0 0 0
Ambient Temperature 80 °F 79 °F 10 5 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0
Sky Conditions 11 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0
Color of Background 12 0 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 0
Plume Color 13 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0
Steam Plume? (y/n)14 0 0 5 0 44 0 0 0 0
Attached to Stack? (y/n)15 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0
16 5 0 0 0 46 5 5 0 0
17 0 0 0 5 47 0 0 0 5
18 0 5 5 0 48 5 0 0 0
19 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 0 50 0 5 0 0
21 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 0 52 5 5 0 0
23 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 5 5
24 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0
25 0 5 0 5 55 0 0 0 0
26 0 5 0 5 56 0 0 0 0
27 10 10 10 15 57 0 0 0 0
The highest six (6) minute rolling average was 12.5 28 15 15 15 10 58 5 5 0 0
Rolling Average > 20%0 29 10 5 5 5 59 0 0 0 0
Rolling Average > 40%0
Lecture Field
10/1/249/28/24
Aeromet Smoke School
Patrick Doyle
Certification Dates
Certification Agency
End
Hydro
Spanish Fork, UT
10/2/24
blue
16:16
NW
blue
none
none
none
none
none
1
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2
AST-2024-4545
clear
17:16
NW
clear
Start
none
Observer's NameAdditional Comments
Observations
Limits:
Observer's Signature Patrick Doyle
Page 49 of 109
Visible Emissions Evaluations
Project No.
Facility Name
Facility Location min 0 15 30 45 min 0 15 30 45
Date 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 10 5
Observation No.1 5 25 35 35 31 0 0 0 0
Source of Emissions 2 45 30 25 20 32 0 0 0 0
Stack Height 20 ft 3 15 15 15 10 33 0 0 0 0
Distance from Source 60 ft 4 10 5 5 10 34 0 0 0 0
Direction from Source NE 5 5 5 5 5 35 0 0 0 0
6 5 10 10 10 36 0 5 0 0
Time 7 10 10 10 10 37 0 0 0 0
Wind Direction (From)8 5 5 10 10 38 0 0 0 5
Wind Speed 4 mph 4 mph 9 5 15 15 10 39 0 0 0 0
Ambient Temperature 40 °F 53 °F 10 10 10 10 10 40 0 0 0 0
Sky Conditions 11 5 5 5 5 41 15 20 25 25
Color of Background 12 5 5 5 5 42 30 15 10 10
Plume Color 13 5 5 5 5 43 5 5 10 10
Steam Plume? (y/n)14 5 5 10 5 44 15 15 15 15
Attached to Stack? (y/n)15 10 5 0 0 45 10 10 10 10
16 5 5 5 0 46 10 15 15 10
17 5 0 0 0 47 15 10 10 10
18 0 5 0 5 48 10 10 10 10
19 5 0 5 5 49 10 10 10 10
20 5 5 15 15 50 5 10 10 10
21 5 0 0 0 51 10 5 5 5
22 0 0 10 5 52 5 5 10 10
23 5 0 0 0 53 5 5 0 0
24 0 5 10 5 54 0 0 5 5
25 10 0 0 0 55 10 5 0 0
26 0 0 5 0 56 0 15 15 15
27 15 0 0 0 57 15 5 0 0
The highest six (6) minute rolling average was 15.2 28 0 0 5 5 58 0 0 15 15
Rolling Average > 20%0 29 10 0 0 0 59 15 5 0 0
Rolling Average > 40%0
Lecture Field
ESE ESE
AST-2024-4545 Observations
Hydro
Spanish Fork, UT
10/3/24
2
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2
Start End
8:31 9:31
clear clear
blue blue
none none
none none
none none
Additional Comments Patrick Doyle
Observer's Signature
Certification Agency Aeromet Smoke School
Observer's Name
Limits:Certification Dates 9/28/24 10/1/24
Patrick Doyle
Page 50 of 109
Visible Emissions Evaluations
Project No.
Facility Name
Facility Location min 0 15 30 45 min 0 15 30 45
Date 0 15 40 40 40 30 0 0 0 0
Observation No.1 45 45 40 40 31 0 0 0 0
Source of Emissions 2 30 30 25 25 32 0 0 0 0
Stack Height 20 ft 3 5 10 10 5 33 0 0 0 0
Distance from Source 60 ft 4 5 5 5 5 34 0 5 0 0
Direction from Source SW 5 5 5 5 5 35 0 0 0 0
6 5 5 5 5 36 0 0 0 0
Time 7 5 10 10 5 37 0 0 0 0
Wind Direction (From)8 5 5 5 5 38 0 0 0 10
Wind Speed 2 mph 7 mph 9 5 5 5 5 39 20 20 20 20
Ambient Temperature 71 °F 75 °F 10 0 0 0 0 40 15 10 5 0
Sky Conditions 11 0 0 0 0 41 5 10 5 5
Color of Background 12 0 0 0 0 42 5 15 15 15
Plume Color 13 0 0 0 0 43 10 10 10 5
Steam Plume? (y/n)14 0 0 0 0 44 5 5 0 5
Attached to Stack? (y/n)15 5 0 0 0 45 5 5 5 5
16 0 0 0 0 46 5 5 5 5
17 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 0 48 5 0 15 15
19 0 0 0 0 49 5 5 0 0
20 0 0 0 0 50 0 5 10 15
21 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 5 0
22 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 0
23 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 0 54 5 5 5 5
25 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0
26 0 5 0 5 56 0 5 5 5
27 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0
The highest six (6) minute rolling average was 20.2 28 0 5 0 0 58 15 5 0 0
Rolling Average > 20%1 29 0 0 0 0 59 15 5 0 0
Rolling Average > 40%0
Lecture Field
W N
AST-2024-4545 Observations
Hydro
Spanish Fork, UT
10/3/24
3
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2
Start End
12:16 13:15
clear clear
blue blue
black none
no none
yes none
Additional Comments Patrick Doyle
Observer's Signature
Certification Agency Aeromet Smoke School
Observer's Name
Limits:Certification Dates 9/28/24 10/1/24
Patrick Doyle
Page 51 of 109

Appendix C

Page 52 of 109
ANALYTICAL REPORT
PREPARED FOR
Attn: Austin Abranovic
Alliance Source Testing LLC
214 Central Circle SW
Decatur, Alabama 35603
Generated 1/9/2025 4:31:17 PM Revision 1
JOB DESCRIPTION
HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
JOB NUMBER
140-38877-1
See page two for job notes and contact information.
Knoxville TN 37921
5815 Middlebrook Pike
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 1 of 32
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 53 of 109
Eurofins Knoxville
Eurofins Knoxville is a laboratory within TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc., a company within Eurofins Environment Testing Group of Companies
Job Notes
This report may not be reproduced except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. The results relate only to the
samples tested. For questions please contact the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this
page.
The test results in this report relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory and will meet all requirements of the
methodology, with any exceptions noted. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the express written
approval of the laboratory. All questions should be directed to the Eurofins TestAmerica Project Manager.
Authorization
Generated
1/9/2025 4:31:17 PM
Revision 1
Authorized for release by
Courtney Adkins, Project Manager II
[e-mail]
[phone]
Page 2 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 54 of 109
Table of Contents
Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Laboratory Job ID: 140-38877-1
Page 3 of 32 Eurofins Knoxville1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
Default Detection Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
Isotope Dilution Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 55 of 109
Definitions/Glossary
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Qualifiers
Dioxin
Qualifier Description
*+LCS and/or LCSD is outside acceptance limits, high biased.
Qualifier
B Compound was found in the blank and sample.
E Result exceeded calibration range.
G The reported quantitation limit has been raised due to an exhibited elevated noise or matrix interference
I Value is EMPC (estimated maximum possible concentration).
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
q The reported result is the estimated maximum possible concentration of this analyte, quantitated using the theoretical ion ratio. The
measured ion ratio does not meet qualitative identification criteria and indicates a possible interference.
Glossary
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
☼Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Abbreviation
%R Percent Recovery
CFL Contains Free Liquid
CFU Colony Forming Unit
CNF Contains No Free Liquid
DER Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac Dilution Factor
DL Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)
EDL Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
LOD Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)
LOQ Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)
MCL EPA recommended "Maximum Contaminant Level"
MDA Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)
MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
MPN Most Probable Number
MQL Method Quantitation Limit
NC Not Calculated
ND Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
NEG Negative / Absent
POS Positive / Present
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
PRES Presumptive
QC Quality Control
RER Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TNTC Too Numerous To Count
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 4 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 56 of 109
Job Narrative140-38877-1
Revision
The report being provided is a revision of the original report sent on 12/30/2024. The report (revision 1) is being revised due to:
EPA M23 revised March 20, 2023 recommends a one-year holding time. The laboratory has updated it's reference data to reflect
this holding time..
Receipt
The samples were received on 10/8/2024 9:45 AM. Unless otherwise noted below, the samples arrived in good condition, and
where required, properly preserved and on ice. The temperatures of the 3 coolers at receipt time were 3.9º C, 4.6º C and 5.8º C.
Receipt Exceptions
The Chain of Custody was received without any analyses selected. Logged per project requirements.
Dioxin
Methods 1613B, 23, 8290, 8290A, HRMS-Sox: Reported analytes OCDD/OCDF and/or non-2378-isomers that are flagged with
and "E" qualifier exceed the upper calibration range of the instrument. Per the method, dilutions are not required to bring these
analytes within the calibration range.
Method 23: The laboratory control sample (LCS) and laboratory control sample duplicate (LCSD) for preparation batch 140-92468and 140-94024 and analytical batch 140-94335 recovered above acceptance limits for several analytes. The entire sample was
consumed during analysis or extraction therefore, the data have been reported.
Method 23: One or more ion abundance ratios are outside criteria for the Isotope Dilution Analyte (IDA) associated with the
following samples: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINED (140-38877-1), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.1 RUN 2 COMBINED (140-38877-2) and M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINED (140-38877-4).
No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Organic Prep
Method Combined Prep: Due to a crack in extraction glassware, approximately 50% of sample M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINED (140-38877-6) was lost.
Method Split: The following samples required a Gel-Permeation clean up, via EPA method 3640A, to reduce matrix interference:
M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINED (140-38877-1), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 2
COMBINED (140-38877-2), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 3 COMBINED (140-38877-3), M23 MELTING
FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINED (140-38877-4), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 2 COMBINED
(140-38877-5), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINED (140-38877-6), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 FIELD
BLANK COMBINED (140-38877-7) and M23 MEDIA CHECK A-2429 FILTER,A-2428 XAD COMBINED (140-38877-12).
Method Split: The following samples required a Gel-Permeation clean up, via EPA method 3640A, to reduce matrix interference:
M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINED (140-38877-1), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 2
COMBINED (140-38877-2), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 3 COMBINED (140-38877-3), M23 MELTING
FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINED (140-38877-4), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 2 COMBINED
(140-38877-5), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINED (140-38877-6), M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 FIELD
BLANK COMBINED (140-38877-7) and M23 MEDIA CHECK A-2429 FILTER,A-2428 XAD COMBINED (140-38877-12).
No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Case Narrative
Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC Job ID: 140-38877-1
Project: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Eurofins Knoxville
Job ID: 140-38877-1 Eurofins Knoxville
Page 5 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 57 of 109
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-1Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN
1 COMBINED
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 10/01/24 11:55
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: EPA 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS)
RL EDL
247 10.0 5.02 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2,3,7,8-TCDD
10.0 5.02 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 18750Total TCDD
50.0 4.37 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 110701,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
50.0 4.37 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 111600 BTotal PeCDD
50.0 27.8 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 19561,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 28.4 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 110701,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 28.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 12570*+1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
50.0 28.1 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 112500Total HxCDD
50.0 8.66 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 142301,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
50.0 8.66 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 18060Total HpCDD
100 1.35 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 13940 BOCDD
51.4 51.4 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:37 11270 G2,3,7,8-TCDF
16.3 16.3 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 161300 E I GTotal TCDF
50.0 8.78 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 125901,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 8.76 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 16590 I2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 8.77 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 149100 I qTotal PeCDF
50.0 6.64 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 17570 I1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 6.29 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 13250 I1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 6.87 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 15560*+ I2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 7.46 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 1470*+1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
50.0 6.81 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 131400 I qTotal HxCDF
50.0 3.02 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 17080 B1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
50.0 3.82 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 116401,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
50.0 3.42 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 113700 BTotal HpCDF
100 0.991 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 13090 I BOCDF
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 78 40-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 1
Isotope Dilution Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 77 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 75 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 84 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 125-130
13C-OCDD 77 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 125-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 69 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 140-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 68 q 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:37 140-130
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 69 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 65 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 76 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 125-130
13C-OCDF 77 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 125-130
37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 83 70-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 97 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 112 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 95 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 85 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 16:54 170-130
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 6 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 58 of 109
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-2Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN
2 COMBINED
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 10/01/24 15:30
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: EPA 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS)
RL EDL
183 10.0 4.17 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2,3,7,8-TCDD
10.0 4.17 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 17050Total TCDD
50.0 2.13 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 18761,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
50.0 2.13 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 112100 BTotal PeCDD
50.0 4.04 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 17531,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 4.12 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 111601,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 4.06 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 12470*+1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
50.0 4.08 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 114600Total HxCDD
50.0 4.63 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 136301,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
50.0 4.63 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 17560Total HpCDD
100 0.531 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 12700 BOCDD
21.8 21.8 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:10 1931 G2,3,7,8-TCDF
14.7 14.7 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 126600 E q GTotal TCDF
50.0 3.79 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 116601,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 3.78 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 13460 I2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 3.79 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 121700 I qTotal PeCDF
50.0 4.00 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 14460 I1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 3.80 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 11930 I1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 4.15 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 13370*+ I2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 4.50 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 1339*+ I1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
50.0 4.11 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 116400 ITotal HxCDF
50.0 1.87 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 13580 B1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
50.0 2.36 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 18931,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
50.0 2.12 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 16700 BTotal HpCDF
100 1.35 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 11390 I BOCDF
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 67 40-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 1
Isotope Dilution Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 60 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 66 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 78 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 125-130
13C-OCDD 67 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 125-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 56 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 140-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 63 q 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:10 140-130
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 57 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 49 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 63 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 125-130
13C-OCDF 65 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 125-130
37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 87 70-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 100 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 115 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 100 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 98 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 17:54 170-130
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 7 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 59 of 109
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-3Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN
3 COMBINED
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 10/02/24 16:00
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: EPA 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS)
RL EDL
252 10.0 7.54 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2,3,7,8-TCDD
10.0 7.54 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 110500Total TCDD
50.0 2.02 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 110401,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
50.0 2.02 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 112800 BTotal PeCDD
50.0 6.57 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 17851,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 6.71 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 113701,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 6.61 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 12460*+1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
50.0 6.63 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 115600Total HxCDD
50.0 3.94 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 137101,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
50.0 3.94 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 17570Total HpCDD
100 1.44 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 12770 BOCDD
29.5 29.5 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 09:56 11460 G2,3,7,8-TCDF
15.9 15.9 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 131300 E GTotal TCDF
50.0 4.40 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 116601,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 4.39 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 13880 I2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 4.39 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 123300 I qTotal PeCDF
50.0 3.79 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 14440 I1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 3.60 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 11660 I1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 3.93 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 13870*+ I2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 4.27 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 1347*+ I1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
50.0 3.90 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 116300 ITotal HxCDF
50.0 1.92 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 12960 B1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
50.0 2.43 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 17451,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
50.0 2.17 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 15340 BTotal HpCDF
100 0.617 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 11130 I BOCDF
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 60 40-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 1
Isotope Dilution Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 59 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 63 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 68 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 125-130
13C-OCDD 59 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 125-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 52 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 09:56 140-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 51 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 46 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 41 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 55 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 125-130
13C-OCDF 59 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 125-130
37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 90 70-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 112 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 120 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 94 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 107 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 13:39 170-130
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 8 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 60 of 109
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-4Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN
1 COMBINED
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 10/02/24 19:45
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: EPA 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS)
RL EDL
173 G 10.2 10.2 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2,3,7,8-TCDD
10.2 10.2 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 17530 GTotal TCDD
50.0 3.65 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 17741,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
50.0 3.65 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 110400 BTotal PeCDD
50.0 4.08 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 15141,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 4.17 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 19341,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 4.10 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 11700*+1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
50.0 4.12 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 111200Total HxCDD
50.0 4.32 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 126201,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
50.0 4.32 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 15380Total HpCDD
100 0.774 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 11830 BOCDD
22.0 22.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:33 1807 G2,3,7,8-TCDF
10.0 9.25 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 118000 ETotal TCDF
50.0 3.31 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 11010 I1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 3.30 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 12410 I2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 3.30 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 113100 I qTotal PeCDF
50.0 4.29 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 12710 I1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 4.07 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 1988 I1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 4.44 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 12470*+ I2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 4.82 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 1210*+ I q1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
50.0 4.41 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 19630 I qTotal HxCDF
50.0 6.43 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 11530 B1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
50.0 8.14 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 13841,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
50.0 7.29 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 12730 BTotal HpCDF
100 1.46 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 1618 I BOCDF
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 80 40-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 1
Isotope Dilution Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 77 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 82 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 83 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 125-130
13C-OCDD 68 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 125-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 65 q 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:33 140-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 73 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 64 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 40 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 62 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 125-130
13C-OCDF 67 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 125-130
37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 84 70-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 106 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 100 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 86 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 97 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 14:38 170-130
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 9 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 61 of 109
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-5Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN
2 COMBINED
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 10/03/24 12:20
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: EPA 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS)
RL EDL
283 10.0 8.93 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2,3,7,8-TCDD
10.0 8.93 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 115400Total TCDD
50.0 8.03 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 114401,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
50.0 8.03 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 119100 BTotal PeCDD
50.0 4.21 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 110401,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 4.30 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 114701,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 4.23 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 13100*+1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
50.0 4.25 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 117200Total HxCDD
50.0 6.51 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 144101,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
50.0 6.51 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 18890Total HpCDD
100 1.78 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 13110 BOCDD
32.0 32.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:01 11820 G2,3,7,8-TCDF
35.6 35.6 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 137400 E q GTotal TCDF
50.0 10.1 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 117601,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 10.1 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 13950 I2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 10.1 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 127700 ITotal PeCDF
50.0 6.66 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 14710 I1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 6.31 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 11920 I1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 6.90 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 12810*+ I2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 7.48 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 1280*+ I1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
50.0 6.84 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 116600 ITotal HxCDF
50.0 11.5 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 13830 B1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
50.0 14.6 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 16221,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
50.0 13.1 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 16100 BTotal HpCDF
100 1.89 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 1897 I BOCDF
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 76 40-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 1
Isotope Dilution Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 61 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 79 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 82 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 125-130
13C-OCDD 70 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 125-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 62 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:01 140-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 58 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 55 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 66 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 70 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 125-130
13C-OCDF 71 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 125-130
37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 80 70-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 100 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 106 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 102 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 94 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 15:38 170-130
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 10 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 62 of 109
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-6Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN
3 COMBINED
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 10/03/24 15:50
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: EPA 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS)
RL EDL
320 10.0 8.36 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2,3,7,8-TCDD
10.0 8.36 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 113900Total TCDD
50.0 12.3 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 110701,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
50.0 12.3 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 113900 BTotal PeCDD
50.0 2.41 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 15141,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 2.46 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 18281,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 2.42 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 11670*+1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
50.0 2.43 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 18920Total HxCDD
50.0 2.01 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 116901,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
50.0 2.01 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 13220Total HpCDD
100 0.594 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 11020 BOCDD
38.3 38.3 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:05 11610 G2,3,7,8-TCDF
15.5 15.5 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 138900 E I GTotal TCDF
50.0 3.32 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 11460 I1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 3.31 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 12820 I2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 3.31 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 120400 ITotal PeCDF
50.0 1.82 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 12220 I1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 1.73 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 11040 I1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 1.89 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 11170*+ I2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 2.05 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 1136*+ I1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
50.0 1.87 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 18610 ITotal HxCDF
50.0 1.03 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 11420 B1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
50.0 1.31 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 12681,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
50.0 1.17 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 12340 BTotal HpCDF
100 0.425 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 1366 I BOCDF
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 74 40-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 1
Isotope Dilution Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 67 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 74 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 84 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 125-130
13C-OCDD 77 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 125-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 69 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:05 140-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 65 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 64 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 70 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 75 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 125-130
13C-OCDF 77 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 125-130
37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 84 70-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 99 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 111 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 101 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 92 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 16:38 170-130
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 11 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 63 of 109
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-7Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 FIELD BLANK
COMBINED
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 09/30/24 15:00
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: EPA 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS)
RL EDL
0.905 J q 10.0 0.231 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2,3,7,8-TCDD
10.0 0.231 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 10.905 J qTotal TCDD
50.0 0.367 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
50.0 0.367 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1NDTotal PeCDD
50.0 0.246 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 0.251 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 0.247 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND *+1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
50.0 0.251 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1NDTotal HxCDD
50.0 1.03 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
50.0 1.03 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1NDTotal HpCDD
100 0.0378 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 10.736 J B qOCDD
10.0 0.255 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND2,3,7,8-TCDF
10.0 0.255 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 11.62 J qTotal TCDF
50.0 0.494 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 0.492 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 0.494 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1NDTotal PeCDF
50.0 0.468 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 0.444 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 0.485 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND *+2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 0.526 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND *+1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
50.0 0.526 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1NDTotal HxCDF
50.0 0.149 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
50.0 0.189 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1ND1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
50.0 0.189 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1NDTotal HpCDF
100 0.0330 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 10.538 J B qOCDF
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 84 40-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1
Isotope Dilution Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 61 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 73 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 83 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 125-130
13C-OCDD 73 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 125-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 62 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 59 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 75 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 74 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 125-130
13C-OCDF 70 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 125-130
37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 90 70-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 109 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 122 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 99 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 170-130
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 99 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 12:39 170-130
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 12 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 64 of 109
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-12Client Sample ID: M23 MEDIA CHECK A-2429 FILTER,A-2428
XAD COMBINED
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 09/30/24 00:00
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: EPA 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS)
RL EDL
ND 10.0 0.295 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
2,3,7,8-TCDD
10.0 0.451 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1NDTotal TCDD
50.0 0.494 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
50.0 0.494 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1NDTotal PeCDD
50.0 0.508 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 0.518 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
50.0 0.511 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND *+1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
50.0 0.518 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1NDTotal HxCDD
50.0 1.46 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
50.0 1.46 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1NDTotal HpCDD
100 0.174 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 11.62 J B qOCDD
10.0 0.304 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND2,3,7,8-TCDF
10.0 0.304 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1NDTotal TCDF
50.0 0.452 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 0.451 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
50.0 0.452 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1NDTotal PeCDF
50.0 0.691 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 0.655 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 0.716 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND *+2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
50.0 0.777 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND *+1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
50.0 0.777 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1NDTotal HxCDF
50.0 0.453 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
50.0 0.573 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1ND1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
50.0 0.573 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1NDTotal HpCDF
100 0.0272 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 11.83 J B qOCDF
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 74 40-130 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 1
Isotope Dilution Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 64 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 71 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 81 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 125-130
13C-OCDD 71 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 125-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 64 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 58 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 69 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 140-130
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 70 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 125-130
13C-OCDF 69 10/22/24 12:36 12/23/24 11:39 125-130
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 13 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 65 of 109
Default Detection Limits0
Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC Job ID: 140-38877-1
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Method: 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS)
Prep: Combined Prep
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
Analyte RL
pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
2,3,7,8-TCDD pg/Sample10.0 pg/Sample
2,3,7,8-TCDF pg/Sample10.0 pg/Sample
OCDD pg/Sample100 pg/Sample
OCDF pg/Sample100 pg/Sample
Total HpCDD pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
Total HpCDF pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
Total HxCDD pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
Total HxCDF pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
Total PeCDD pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
Total PeCDF pg/Sample50.0 pg/Sample
Total TCDD pg/Sample10.0 pg/Sample
Total TCDF pg/Sample10.0 pg/Sample
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 14 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 66 of 109
Surrogate Summary
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Method: 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS)
Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Air
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (70-130) (70-130) (70-130) (70-130) (70-130)
37TCDD PeCF HxCDD HxCDF HpCDF2
83 97 112 95 85140-38877-1
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINED
87 100 115 98100140-38877-2 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.1 RUN 2 COMBINED
90 112 120 10794140-38877-3 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.1 RUN 3 COMBINED
84 106 100 9786140-38877-4 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINED
80 100 106 94102140-38877-5 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 2 COMBINED
84 99 111 92101140-38877-6 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINED
90 109 122 9999140-38877-7 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
FIELD BLANK COMBINED
Surrogate Legend
37TCDD = 37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD
PeCF = 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
HxCDD = 13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
HxCDF = 13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
HpCDF2 = 13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 15 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 67 of 109
Isotope Dilution Summary
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Method: 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS)
Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Air
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (40-130) (40-130) (40-130) (25-130) (25-130) (40-130) (40-130) (40-130)
TCDD PeCDD HxDD HpCDD OCDD TCDF PeCDF HxDF
78 77 75 84 77 69 69 65140-38877-1
Percent Isotope Dilution Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINED
68 q140-38877-1 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINED
67 60 66 6778 56 57 49140-38877-2 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.1 RUN 2 COMBINED
63 q140-38877-2 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.1 RUN 2 COMBINED
60 59 63 5968 51 46 41140-38877-3 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.1 RUN 3 COMBINED
52140-38877-3 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.1 RUN 3 COMBINED
80 77 82 6883 73 64 40140-38877-4 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINED
65 q140-38877-4 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINED
76 61 79 7082 58 55 66140-38877-5 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 2 COMBINED
62140-38877-5 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 2 COMBINED
74 67 74 7784 65 64 70140-38877-6 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINED
69140-38877-6 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINED
84 61 73 7383 62 59 75140-38877-7 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
FIELD BLANK COMBINED
74 64 71 7181 64 58 69140-38877-12 M23 MEDIA CHECK A-2429
FILTER,A-2428 XAD COMBINED
73 70 71 6980 65 64 61LCS 140-92468/9-C Lab Control Sample
71 63 68 7083 57 58 54LCSD 140-92468/10-C Lab Control Sample Dup
75 62 71 6978 56 56 72MB 140-92468/11-C Method Blank
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (25-130) (25-130)
HpCDF OCDF
76 77140-38877-1
Percent Isotope Dilution Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINED
140-38877-1 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINED
63 65140-38877-2 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.1 RUN 2 COMBINED
140-38877-2 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.1 RUN 2 COMBINED
55 59140-38877-3 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.1 RUN 3 COMBINED
140-38877-3 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.1 RUN 3 COMBINED
62 67140-38877-4 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINED
140-38877-4 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINED
70 71140-38877-5 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 2 COMBINED
140-38877-5 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 2 COMBINED
75 77140-38877-6 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINED
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 16 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 68 of 109
Isotope Dilution Summary
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Method: 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS) (Continued)
Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Air
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (25-130) (25-130)
HpCDF OCDF
140-38877-6
Percent Isotope Dilution Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINED
74 70140-38877-7 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21
FIELD BLANK COMBINED
70 69140-38877-12 M23 MEDIA CHECK A-2429
FILTER,A-2428 XAD COMBINED
69 63LCS 140-92468/9-C Lab Control Sample
68 64LCSD 140-92468/10-C Lab Control Sample Dup
73 67MB 140-92468/11-C Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
TCDD = 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
PeCDD = 13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
HxDD = 13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
HpCDD = 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDD = 13C-OCDD
TCDF = 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
PeCDF = 13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
HxDF = 13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
HpCDF = 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
OCDF = 13C-OCDF
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 17 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 69 of 109
QC Sample Results
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Method: 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 140-92468/11-C
Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 94335 Prep Batch: 92468
RL EDL
2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 10.0 0.107 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
ND 0.14510.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 1Total TCDD
ND 0.17750.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 11,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
0.2526 J q 0.17750.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 1Total PeCDD
ND 0.34950.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 11,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
ND 0.35650.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
ND 0.35150.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 11,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
ND 0.35650.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 1Total HxCDD
ND 0.77150.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 11,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
ND 0.77150.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 1Total HpCDD
1.799 J q 0.107100 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 1OCDD
ND 0.090410.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 12,3,7,8-TCDF
ND 0.25610.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 1Total TCDF
ND 0.27650.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 11,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
ND 0.27650.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 12,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
ND 0.27650.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 1Total PeCDF
ND 0.25550.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 11,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
ND 0.24250.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND 0.26450.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 12,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
ND 0.28750.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 11,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
ND 0.28750.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 1Total HxCDF
0.5426 J q 0.16750.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 11,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
ND 0.21250.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 11,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
0.5426 J q 0.19050.0 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 1Total HpCDF
3.926 J 0.0487100 pg/Sample 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 1OCDF
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 75 40-130 12/19/24 13:15 1
MB MB
Isotope Dilution
10/22/24 12:36
Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
62 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 113C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 40-130
71 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 113C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 40-130
78 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 113C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 25-130
69 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 113C-OCDD 25-130
56 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 113C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 40-130
56 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 113C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 40-130
72 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 113C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 40-130
73 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 113C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 25-130
67 10/22/24 12:36 12/19/24 13:15 113C-OCDF 25-130
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 140-92468/9-C
Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 94335 Prep Batch: 92468
2,3,7,8-TCDD 200 196.9 pg/Sample 98 70-130
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec
Limits
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 1000 1068 pg/Sample 107 70-130
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1000 1160 pg/Sample 116 70-130
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1000 1178 pg/Sample 118 70-130
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1000 1293 pg/Sample 129 70-130
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 1000 1059 pg/Sample 106 70-130
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 18 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 70 of 109
QC Sample Results
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Method: 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 140-92468/9-C
Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 94335 Prep Batch: 92468
OCDD 2000 2246 pg/Sample 112 70-130
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec
Limits
2,3,7,8-TCDF 200 199.2 pg/Sample 100 70-130
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 1000 1149 pg/Sample 115 70-130
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1000 1152 pg/Sample 115 70-130
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1000 1052 pg/Sample 105 70-130
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1000 1071 pg/Sample 107 70-130
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1000 1346 *+ pg/Sample 135 70-130
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1000 1355 *+ pg/Sample 135 70-130
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1000 1061 pg/Sample 106 70-130
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1000 1156 pg/Sample 116 70-130
OCDF 2000 2048 pg/Sample 102 70-130
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 40 -130
Isotope Dilution
73
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
7013C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 40 -130
7113C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 40 -130
8013C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 25 -130
6913C-OCDD 25 -130
6513C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 40 -130
6413C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 40 -130
6113C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 40 -130
6913C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 25 -130
6313C-OCDF 25 -130
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 140-92468/10-C
Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 94335 Prep Batch: 92468
2,3,7,8-TCDD 200 198.0 pg/Sample 99 70-130 1 50
Analyte
LCSD LCSD
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 1000 1072 pg/Sample 107 70-130 0 50
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1000 1200 pg/Sample 120 70-130 3 50
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1000 1220 pg/Sample 122 70-130 4 50
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1000 1377 *+ pg/Sample 138 70-130 6 50
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 1000 1040 pg/Sample 104 70-130 2 50
OCDD 2000 2262 pg/Sample 113 70-130 1 50
2,3,7,8-TCDF 200 203.6 pg/Sample 102 70-130 2 50
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 1000 1140 pg/Sample 114 70-130 1 50
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1000 1134 pg/Sample 113 70-130 2 50
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1000 1029 pg/Sample 103 70-130 2 50
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1000 1070 pg/Sample 107 70-130 0 50
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1000 1514 *+ pg/Sample 151 70-130 12 50
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1000 1554 *+ pg/Sample 155 70-130 14 50
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1000 1072 pg/Sample 107 70-130 1 50
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1000 1194 pg/Sample 119 70-130 3 50
OCDF 2000 2080 pg/Sample 104 70-130 2 50
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 40 -130
Isotope Dilution
71
LCSD LCSD
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 19 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 71 of 109
QC Sample Results
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Method: 23 - Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 140-92468/10-C
Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 94335 Prep Batch: 92468
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 40 -130
Isotope Dilution
63
LCSD LCSD
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
6813C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 40 -130
8313C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 25 -130
7013C-OCDD 25 -130
5713C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 40 -130
5813C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 40 -130
5413C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 40 -130
6813C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 25 -130
6413C-OCDF 25 -130
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 20 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 72 of 109
QC Association Summary
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Specialty Organics
Prep Batch: 92468
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Air Combined Prep140-38877-1 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Combined Prep140-38877-2 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 2 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Combined Prep140-38877-3 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 3 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Combined Prep140-38877-4 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Combined Prep140-38877-5 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 2 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Combined Prep140-38877-6 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Combined Prep140-38877-7 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 FIELD BLANK COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Combined Prep140-38877-12 M23 MEDIA CHECK A-2429 FILTER,A-2428 XAD COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Combined PrepMB 140-92468/11-C Method Blank Total/NA
Air Combined PrepLCS 140-92468/9-C Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Air Combined PrepLCSD 140-92468/10-C Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA
Cleanup Batch: 94024
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Air Split 92468140-38877-1 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Split 92468140-38877-2 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 2 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Split 92468140-38877-3 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 3 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Split 92468140-38877-4 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Split 92468140-38877-5 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 2 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Split 92468140-38877-6 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Split 92468140-38877-7 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 FIELD BLANK COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Split 92468140-38877-12 M23 MEDIA CHECK A-2429 FILTER,A-2428 XAD COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air Split 92468MB 140-92468/11-C Method Blank Total/NA
Air Split 92468LCS 140-92468/9-C Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Air Split 92468LCSD 140-92468/10-C Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 94335
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Air 23 94024140-38877-1 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air 23 94024140-38877-2 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 2 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air 23 94024MB 140-92468/11-C Method Blank Total/NA
Air 23 94024LCS 140-92468/9-C Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Air 23 94024LCSD 140-92468/10-C Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 94427
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Air 23 94024140-38877-3 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 3 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air 23 94024140-38877-4 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air 23 94024140-38877-5 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 2 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air 23 94024140-38877-6 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air 23 94024140-38877-7 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 FIELD BLANK COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air 23 94024140-38877-12 M23 MEDIA CHECK A-2429 FILTER,A-2428 XAD COMBINEDTotal/NA
Analysis Batch: 94428
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Air 23 94024140-38877-1 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air 23 94024140-38877-2 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 2 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air 23 94024140-38877-3 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 3 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air 23 94024140-38877-4 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 1 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air 23 94024140-38877-5 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 2 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Air 23 94024140-38877-6 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 3 COMBINEDTotal/NA
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 21 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 73 of 109
Lab Chronicle
Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC Job ID: 140-38877-1
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN
1 COMBINED
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-1
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 10/01/24 11:55
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Prep Combined Prep RKG10/22/24 12:36 EET KNX92468
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94428 12/23/24 12:37 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D12CInstrument ID:
Prep Combined Prep 92468 10/22/24 12:36 RKG EET KNXTotal/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94335 12/19/24 16:54 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D4AInstrument ID:
Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN
2 COMBINED
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-2
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 10/01/24 15:30
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Prep Combined Prep RKG10/22/24 12:36 EET KNX92468
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94428 12/23/24 13:10 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D12CInstrument ID:
Prep Combined Prep 92468 10/22/24 12:36 RKG EET KNXTotal/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94335 12/19/24 17:54 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D4AInstrument ID:
Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN
3 COMBINED
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-3
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 10/02/24 16:00
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Prep Combined Prep RKG10/22/24 12:36 EET KNX92468
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94428 12/23/24 09:56 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D12CInstrument ID:
Prep Combined Prep 92468 10/22/24 12:36 RKG EET KNXTotal/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94427 12/23/24 13:39 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D4AInstrument ID:
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 22 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 74 of 109
Lab Chronicle
Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC Job ID: 140-38877-1
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN
1 COMBINED
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-4
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 10/02/24 19:45
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Prep Combined Prep RKG10/22/24 12:36 EET KNX92468
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94428 12/23/24 11:33 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D12CInstrument ID:
Prep Combined Prep 92468 10/22/24 12:36 RKG EET KNXTotal/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94427 12/23/24 14:38 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D4AInstrument ID:
Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN
2 COMBINED
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-5
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 10/03/24 12:20
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Prep Combined Prep RKG10/22/24 12:36 EET KNX92468
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94428 12/23/24 11:01 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D12CInstrument ID:
Prep Combined Prep 92468 10/22/24 12:36 RKG EET KNXTotal/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94427 12/23/24 15:38 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D4AInstrument ID:
Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN
3 COMBINED
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-6
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 10/03/24 15:50
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Prep Combined Prep RKG10/22/24 12:36 EET KNX92468
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94428 12/23/24 12:05 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D12CInstrument ID:
Prep Combined Prep 92468 10/22/24 12:36 RKG EET KNXTotal/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94427 12/23/24 16:38 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D4AInstrument ID:
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 23 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 75 of 109
Lab Chronicle
Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC Job ID: 140-38877-1
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Client Sample ID: M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 FIELD BLANK
COMBINED
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-7
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 09/30/24 15:00
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Prep Combined Prep RKG10/22/24 12:36 EET KNX92468
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94427 12/23/24 12:39 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D4AInstrument ID:
Client Sample ID: M23 MEDIA CHECK A-2429 FILTER,A-2428
XAD COMBINED
Lab Sample ID: 140-38877-12
Matrix: AirDate Collected: 09/30/24 00:00
Date Received: 10/08/24 09:45
Prep Combined Prep RKG10/22/24 12:36 EET KNX92468
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94427 12/23/24 11:39 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D4AInstrument ID:
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Lab Sample ID: MB 140-92468/11-C
Matrix: AirDate Collected: N/A
Date Received: N/A
Prep Combined Prep RKG10/22/24 12:36 EET KNX92468
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94335 12/19/24 13:15 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D4AInstrument ID:
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Lab Sample ID: LCS 140-92468/9-C
Matrix: AirDate Collected: N/A
Date Received: N/A
Prep Combined Prep RKG10/22/24 12:36 EET KNX92468
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94335 12/19/24 10:30 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D4AInstrument ID:
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Lab Sample ID: LCSD 140-92468/10-C
Matrix: AirDate Collected: N/A
Date Received: N/A
Prep Combined Prep RKG10/22/24 12:36 EET KNX92468
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 1 Sample 10 mL
Cleanup Split 94024 12/10/24 15:10 SRG EET KNXTotal/NA 5 mL 10 uL
Analysis 23 1 94335 12/19/24 11:30 HAM EET KNXTotal/NA
D4AInstrument ID:
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 24 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 76 of 109
Lab Chronicle
Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC Job ID: 140-38877-1
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Laboratory References:
EET KNX = Eurofins Knoxville, 5815 Middlebrook Pike, Knoxville, TN 37921, TEL [phone]
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 25 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 77 of 109
Accreditation/Certification Summary
Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC Job ID: 140-38877-1
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Laboratory: Eurofins Knoxville
All accreditations/certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all accreditations/certifications are applicable to this report.
Authority Program Identification Number Expiration Date
AFCEE N/A
ANAB Dept. of Defense ELAP L2311 02-13-25
ANAB Dept. of Energy L2311.01 02-13-25
ANAB ISO/IEC 17025 L2311 02-13-25
Arkansas DEQ State 88-0688 06-17-25
Colorado State TN00009 02-28-25
Connecticut State PH-0223 10-01-26
Florida NELAP E87177 06-30-25
Georgia (DW)State 906 07-27-25
Hawaii State NA 07-27-25
Kansas NELAP E-10349 10-31-25
Kentucky (DW)State 90101 12-31-24
Louisiana (All)NELAP 03079 06-30-25
Louisiana (DW)State LA019 12-31-24
Maryland State 277 03-31-25
Michigan State 9933 07-27-25
Nevada State TN00009 07-31-25
New Hampshire NELAP 2999 01-17-25
New Jersey NELAP TN001 06-30-25
New York NELAP 10781 03-31-25
North Carolina (DW)State 21705 07-31-25
North Carolina (WW/SW)State 64 12-31-24
Oklahoma State 9415 12-31-24
Oregon NELAP TNI0189 01-01-25
Pennsylvania NELAP 68-00576 12-31-25
Tennessee State 02014 07-27-25
Texas NELAP T104704380 08-31-25
US Fish & Wildlife US Federal Programs 058448 07-31-25
USDA US Federal Programs 525-22-279-18762 10-06-25
Utah NELAP TN00009 07-31-25
Virginia NELAP 460176 09-14-25
Washington State C593 01-19-25
West Virginia (DW)State 9955C 12-31-24
West Virginia DEP State 345 04-30-25
Wisconsin State 998044300 08-31-25
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 26 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 78 of 109
Method Summary
Job ID: 140-38877-1Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol
EPA23Dioxins and Furans (Stationary Source) (HRGC/HRMS)EET KNX
NoneCombined Prep Extraction, Source Air Samples (Combined)EET KNX
NoneSplitSource Air Split EET KNX
Protocol References:
EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency
None = None
Laboratory References:
EET KNX = Eurofins Knoxville, 5815 Middlebrook Pike, Knoxville, TN 37921, TEL [phone]
Eurofins Knoxville
Page 27 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 79 of 109
Sample Summary
Client: Alliance Source Testing LLC Job ID: 140-38877-1
Project/Site: HYDRO MELTING FURNACE #21 M23
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received
140-38877-1 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 1
COMBINED
Air 10/01/24 11:55 10/08/24 09:45
140-38877-2 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 2
COMBINED
Air 10/01/24 15:30 10/08/24 09:45
140-38877-3 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.1 RUN 3
COMBINED
Air 10/02/24 16:00 10/08/24 09:45
140-38877-4 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 1
COMBINED
Air 10/02/24 19:45 10/08/24 09:45
140-38877-5 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 2
COMBINED
Air 10/03/24 12:20 10/08/24 09:45
140-38877-6 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 COND.2 RUN 3
COMBINED
Air 10/03/24 15:50 10/08/24 09:45
140-38877-7 M23 MELTING FURNACE #21 FIELD BLANK
COMBINED
Air 09/30/24 15:00 10/08/24 09:45
140-38877-12 M23 MEDIA CHECK A-2429 FILTER,A-2428 XAD
COMBINED
Air 09/30/24 00:00 10/08/24 09:45
Eurofins KnoxvillePage 28 of 32 1/9/2025 (Rev. 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 80 of 109
Pa
g
e

2
9

o
f

3
2
1/
9
/
2
0
2
5

(
R
e
v
.

1
)
123456789101112131415
Pa
g
e

81

of

10
9
Pa
g
e

3
0

o
f

3
2
1/
9
/
2
0
2
5

(
R
e
v
.

1
)
123456789101112131415
Pa
g
e

82

of

10
9
Pa
g
e

3
1

o
f

3
2
1/
9
/
2
0
2
5

(
R
e
v
.

1
)
123456789101112131415
Pa
g
e

83

of

10
9
Pa
g
e

3
2

o
f

3
2
1/
9
/
2
0
2
5

(
R
e
v
.

1
)
123456789101112131415
Pa
g
e

84

of

10
9

Appendix D

Page 85 of 109
QA/QC Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
#1 #2 #3 Dn (Average)Difference
10/1/24 GL.39 0.390 0.390 0.390 0.390 0.000 glass
10/1/24 Gl.35 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.000 glass
10/1/24 1803796 no no no
10/1/24 Pr-706-4 no no no
Date Probe or Thermocouple ID ReferenceTemp. (°F)
IndicatedTemp. (°F)Difference Criteria Probe Length
10/1/24 1803796 250.0 250.0 0.0%6 '
10/1/24 Pr-706-4 250.0 250.0 0.0%6 '
Date 09/30/24 10/01/24 10/02/24
Balance ID:SCALE 76 SCALE 76 SCALE 76
Certified Weight ID:SCLC-1 KG-1 SCLC-1 KG-1 SCLC-1 KG-1
Certified Weight (g):1000.0 1000.0 1000.0
Measured Weight (g):999.8 999.8 999.8
Weight Difference (g):0.2 0.2 0.2 ------
9/30/24 Weather Station NA Yes NA
10/1/24 M5-2600
10/1/24 M5-9
Field Lot Number Date Prepared Prepared By
Acetone 240414 No
DI Water 233598 No
Toluene 131134 No
± 1.5 % (absolute)
Reagent Name Field Prep performed?Lot/ID Number
Date Barometric Pressure Evidence ofdamage?Reading Verified Calibration or Repair required?
Material
Pass
Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check
Pass
≤ 0.004 in.
Date Pitot ID Evidence ofdamage?
Weather Station Location
Provo UT
Evidence ofmis-alignment?Calibration or Repair required?
Field Balance Check
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 1
AST-2024-4545
Nozzle Diameter (in.)Date Nozzle ID Criteria
DF
If Field Prep Performed:
Page 86 of 109
QA/QC Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
#1 #2 #3 Dn (Average)Difference
10/2/24 Gl.39 0.390 0.390 0.390 0.390 0.000 glass
10/2/24 Gl.35 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.000 glass
10/2/24 1803796 no no no
10/2/24 Pr-706-4 no no no
Date Probe or Thermocouple ID ReferenceTemp. (°F)
IndicatedTemp. (°F)Difference Criteria Probe Length
10/2/24 1807396 250.0 250.0 0.0%6 '
10/2/24 Pr-706-4 250.0 250.0 0.0%6 '
Date 10/02/24 10/03/24
Balance ID:SCALE 76 SCALE 76
Certified Weight ID:SCLC-1 KG-1 SCLC-1 KG-1
Certified Weight (g):1000.0 1000.0
Measured Weight (g):999.8 999.8
Weight Difference (g):0.2 0.2 --------
10/2/24 Weather Station NA Yes NA
10/2/24 M5-9
10/2/24 M5-2600
Field Lot Number Date Prepared Prepared By
Acetone 240414 No
DI Water 233598 No
Toluene 131134 No
If Field Prep Performed:
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
Melter Stack #21 Cond. 2
AST-2024-4545
Nozzle Diameter (in.)Date Nozzle ID Criteria
D/F
Material
Pass
Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check
Pass
≤ 0.004 in.
Date Pitot ID Evidence ofdamage?
Weather Station Location
Provo UT
Evidence ofmis-alignment?Calibration or Repair required?
Field Balance Check
± 1.5 % (absolute)
Reagent Name Field Prep performed?Lot/ID Number
Date Barometric Pressure Evidence ofdamage?Reading Verified Calibration or Repair required?
Page 87 of 109
Document ID 620.004
Revision 24.0
Effective Date 1/31/24
Issuing Department Page 1 of 1
Console ID:
Meter S/N:
Critical Orifice S/N:
(PbI)
(PbF)
(Pb)
(Y)SH-73 SH-73 SH-63 SH-63 SH-55 SH-55
(K')0.7864 0.7864 0.6007 0.601 0.4524 0.452
(VP)14.0 14.0 16.0 16.0 18.0 18.0
Initial DGM Volume, ft3 (VmI)743.500 759.300 775.200 787.300 799.900 809.000
Final DGM Volume, ft3 (VmF)758.981 774.766 787.081 799.195 808.842 817.958
Total DGM Volume, ft3 (Vm)15.481 15.466 11.881 11.895 8.942 8.958
Ambient Temperature, °F (Ta)82 83 83 83 84 84
Initial DGM Temperature, °F (TmI)82 83 83 83 84 84
Final DGM Temperature, °F (TmF)82 83 83 84 84 84
Average DGM Temperature, °F ( Tm)82 83 83 84 84 84
Elapsed Time (Θ)15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (ΔH)2.90 2.90 1.70 1.70 0.95 0.95
Standard Meter volume, ft3 (Vmstd)13.0134 12.9768 9.9347 9.9373 7.4474 7.4607
Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ft3 (Vcr)12.9748 12.9628 9.9018 9.9018 7.4504 7.4504
Meter Correction Factor (Y)0.997 0.999 0.997 0.996 1.000 0.999
Tolerance --0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001
Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @)1.833 1.833 1.835 1.833 1.804 1.804
Tolerance --0.009 0.009 0.011 0.010 0.020 0.020
Orifice Cal Check --
Meter Correction Factor (Y)
Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @)
Accuracy Absolute
Difference
oF oR oF oR %oF
0 460 1 461 -0.2 1
68 528 67 527 0.2 1
100 560 99 559 0.2 1
223 683 224 684 -0.1 1
248 708 249 709 -0.1 1
273 733 274 734 -0.1 1
300 760 301 761 -0.1 1
400 860 399 859 0.1 1
500 960 498 958 0.2 2
600 1,060 599 1,059 0.1 1
700 1,160 701 1,161 -0.1 1
800 1,260 800 1,260 0.0 0
900 1,360 900 1,360 0.0 0
1,000 1,460 1,001 1,461 -0.1 1
1,100 1,560 1,101 1,561 -0.1 1
1,200 1,660 1,201 1,661 -0.1 1
Calibration Date:
Charles R HortonReviewed By:
Xander G KrahnCalibration By:
7/12/2024
Equipment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor
Reference Temp.Display Temp.
Practical Instrument Electronics
887216
Personnel
Reference Calibrator Make:
Reference Calibrator Model:
Reference Calibrator S/N:
Calibration Detail
K' Factor, ft3·R1/2 / in. WC·min
Piecal 520B
Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg
Initial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Final Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Average Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Critifcal Orifice ID
Calibration Detail
M5-09
23075443
SH 40-73
Positive Pressure Leak Check
Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter
0.998
1.824
Yes
0.15 0.29 0.30
DGM Calibration-Orifices
Tech Services
25.60
25.60
25.60
Page 88 of 109
Document ID 620.004
Revision 23.1
Effective Date 8/29/23
Issuing Department Page 1 of 1
Console ID:
Meter S/N:
Critical Orifice S/N:
(PbI)
(PbF)
(Pb)
(Y)SH-73 SH-63 SH-63 SH-55 SH-55
(K')0.7864 0.7864 0.6007 0.601 0.4524 0.452
(VP)14.0 14.0 15.5 15.5 17.0 17.0
Initial DGM Volume, ft3 (VmI)866.200 892.300 920.500 940.700 963.900 979.400
Final DGM Volume, ft3 (VmF)891.744 917.835 940.172 960.475 978.765 997.191
Total DGM Volume, ft3 (Vm)25.544 25.535 19.672 19.775 14.865 17.791
Ambient Temperature, °F (Ta)67 67 67 67 69 65
Initial DGM Temperature, °F (TmI)67 67 67 67 69 65
Final DGM Temperature, °F (TmF)68 67 67 67 65 66
Average DGM Temperature, °F ( Tm)68 67 67 67 67 66
Elapsed Time (Θ)25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 30.00
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (ΔH)2.80 2.80 1.60 1.60 0.91 0.91
Standard Meter volume, ft3 (Vmstd)22.0609 22.0741 16.9476 17.0363 12.7811 15.3405
Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ft3 (Vcr)21.9347 21.9347 16.7550 16.7550 12.5947 15.1711
Meter Correction Factor (Y)0.994 0.994 0.989 0.983 0.985 0.989
Tolerance --0.005 0.005 0.000 0.006 0.004 0.000
Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @)1.767 1.769 1.726 1.726 1.734 1.726
Tolerance --0.026 0.027 0.015 0.015 0.007 0.015
Orifice Cal Check --
Meter Correction Factor (Y)
Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @)
Accuracy Absolute
Difference
oF oR oF oR %oF
0 460 1 461 -0.2 1
68 528 66 526 0.4 2
100 560 98 558 0.4 2
223 683 223 683 0.0 0
248 708 249 709 -0.1 1
273 733 274 734 -0.1 1
300 760 300 760 0.0 0
400 860 399 859 0.1 1
500 960 498 958 0.2 2
600 1,060 599 1,059 0.1 1
700 1,160 701 1,161 -0.1 1
800 1,260 800 1,260 0.0 0
900 1,360 900 1,360 0.0 0
1,000 1,460 1,001 1,461 -0.1 1
1,100 1,560 1,101 1,561 -0.1 1
1,200 1,660 1,201 1,661 -0.1 1
Calibration Date:
Yes
0.80 0.80 0.68
DGM Calibration-Orifices
Tech Services
25.61
25.60
25.61
K' Factor, ft3·R1/2 / in. WC·min
Piecal 520B
Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg
Initial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Final Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Average Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Critifcal Orifice ID
Calibration Detail
M5-2600
257255
SH 40-73
Positive Pressure Leak Check
Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter
0.989
1.741
Personnel
Reference Calibrator Make:
Reference Calibrator Model:
Reference Calibrator S/N:
Calibration Detail
Equipment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor
Reference Temp.Display Temp.
Practical Instrument Electronics
121645
Charles HortonReviewed By:
Xander Gray KrahnCalibration By:
5/3/2024
Page 89 of 109
Balance
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551-8150
Accreditation #62754 PGVP Vendor ID # G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:RR02538 Certification Date:09/21/2023
Product ID Number:125371 Expiration Date:09/19/2031
Cylinder Pressure:1900 PSIG MFG Facility: - Shreveport - LA
COA #RR02538.20230831-0 Lot Number:RR02538.20230831
Customer PO. NO.:Tracking Number:103925725
Customer:Previous Certification Dates:
This calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-12/531,
using procedure G1.
Do Not Use This Cylinder Below 100 psig (0.7 Megapascal).
Certified Concentration(s)
Component Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
Carbon Dioxide 10.9 %±0.11 %FTIR 09/21/2023
Oxygen 11.00 %±0.03 %MPA 09/18/2023
Nitrogen
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online.
Reference Standard(s)
Serial Number Lot Expiration Type Balance Component Concentration Uncertainty(%)NIST Reference
CC737012 CC737012.20230228 07/09/2031 GMIS N2 O2 20 %0.112 SRM 2659a
EB0022021 EB0022021.20180323 07/15/2026 GMIS N2 CO2 14.9 %0.777 101001
Analytical Instrumentation SMART-CERT
Component Principle Make MPC Date
O2 MPA Thermo 09/18/2023
CO2 FTIR MKS 09/21/2023
Serial
1162980025
017146467
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the International System of Units (SI). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. If not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17
Model
410i
MKS 2031DJG2EKVS13T
Page 90 of 109
Balance
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551-8150
Accreditation #62754 PGVP Vendor ID # G12024
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:EB0069884 Certification Date:04/03/2024
Product ID Number:127907 Expiration Date:04/01/2032
Cylinder Pressure:1900 PSIG MFG Facility: - Shreveport - LA
COA #EB0069884.20240320-0 Lot Number:EB0069884.20240320
Customer PO. NO.:Tracking Number:084212711
Customer:Previous Certification Dates:
This calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-12/531,
using procedure G2.
Do Not Use This Cylinder Below 100 psig (0.7 Megapascal).
Certified Concentration(s)
Component Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
Carbon Dioxide 23.9 %±0.1 %FTIR 04/03/2024
Oxygen 23.99 %±0.06 %MPA 03/27/2024
Nitrogen
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online.
Reference Standard(s)
Serial Number Lot Expiration Type Balance Component Concentration Uncertainty(%)NIST Reference
CC520205 CC520205.20230108 07/09/2031 GMIS N2 O2 20.01 %0.112 SRM 2659a
EB0022009 EB0022009.20201022 04/05/2030 GMIS N2 CO2 24.76 %0.237 C1847810.03
Analytical Instrumentation SMART-CERT
Component Principle Make MPC Date
O2 MPA Thermo 03/18/2024
CO2 FTIR MKS 04/02/2024
Serial
1162980025
017146467
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the International System of Units (SI). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. If not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
Brittany Johnson
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17
Model
410i
MKS 2031DJG2EKVS13T
Page 91 of 109
Pa
t
r
i
c
k

D
o
y
l
e
Is
s
u
e
d
:

0
9
/
3
0
/
2
0
2
4

Ex
p
i
r
e
s
:

0
3
/
3
0
/
2
0
2
5

Patrick Doyle
Certification Date: September 30, 2024
Expiration Date: March 30, 2025 AeroMet Instructor: Steve Mumma
Page 92 of 109

Appendix E

Page 93 of 109
1
Erica Bolek
From:Cecil Jacobson <[e-mail]>
Sent:Wednesday, January 8, 2025 10:13 AM
To:Charles Horton; Nicholas Butel; Michele Wood
Cc:Erica Bolek; Eric Wentz
Subject:RE: Hydro Melt Furnace process data
EXTERNAL EMAIL - This email was sent by a person from outside your organization. Exercise caution when clicking links,
opening attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.
Secured by Check Point

Charles,
Please find the charge data that you requested for each of the test runs. The charges weights are for the metal charged
into the Melter during each parƟcular run. If you have quesƟons, please let me know.
Thanks,
Cecil Jacobson

Here are the run times: Total Charged to Melter % Painted Cast Number
10/1/2024 08:50 – 11:32 71,040 -lb 22.1 s24100103
10/1/2024 11:48 – 14:56 95,260 -lb 24.7 s24100104
10/2/2024 11:36 – 15:37 88,140 -lb 22.0 s24100203

10/2/2024 16:16 – 19:26 91,620 -lb 30.8 s24100204
10/3/2024 08:30 – 11:55 98,760 -lb 30.1 s24100302
10/3/2024 12:15 – 15:05 88,170 -lb 32.9 s24100303

From: Charles Horton <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2025 1:22 PM
To: Cecil Jacobson <[e-mail]>; Nicholas Butel <[e-mail]>; Michele Wood
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Erica Bolek <[e-mail]>; Eric Wentz <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Hydro Melt Furnace process data

[This email originated from outside of Hydro. Be careful with links and attachments.]

I know a lot of people are out due to the holidays, so I wanted to include the whole team here with this
data request.

Regards,

Charles Horton
Alliance // Operations Manager - SLC
Direct: 352-663-7568

Page 94 of 109
2
From: Charles Horton
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2025 11:28 AM
To: Cecil Jacobson <[e-mail]>
Cc: Erica Bolek <[e-mail]>; Eric Wentz <[e-mail]>
Subject: Hydro Melt Furnace process data

Good Morning Cecil,

We have finally received the lab results and are working on getting the draft report to you for review. We
need process data to calculate the ng/MG. Can you provide the plant feed rate data?

Here are the run times:
10/1/2024 08:50 – 11:32
10/1/2024 11:48 – 14:56
10/2/2024 11:36 – 15:37

10/2/2024 16:16 – 19:26
10/3/2024 08:30 – 11:55
10/3/2024 12:15 – 15:05

Regards,

Charles Horton
Operations Manager – Salt Lake City Office
Direct: 352-663-7568
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Ste E // West Valley City, UT 84120
www.alliancetg.com

NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it, may contain confidential or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this message is
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the e-mail
and attached documents. Thank you.
Page 95 of 109

Appendix F

Page 96 of 109

Site Specific Test Plan

Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
1550 Hydro Way
Spanish Fork, UT 84660 Source to be Tested: Melting Furnace #21 Proposed Test Dates: June 4 – 6, 2024 Project No. AST-2024-1704

Prepared By Alliance Technical Group, LLC 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Page 97 of 109

Site Specific Test Plan
Test Program Summary

AST-2024-1704 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page i
Regulatory Information

Permit No. DAQE-AN108470016-22
Regulatory Applicability 40 CFR 63, Subpart RRR

Source Information

Source Name Target Parameters Melting Furnace #21 D/F, VEE Contact Information

Test Location Test Company Analytical Laboratory
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC
1550 Hydro Way
Spanish Fork, UT 84660
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120

Project Manager
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
[phone]

Field Team Leader
Alan Jensen
[e-mail]
[phone]
(subject to change)

QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
[e-mail]
[phone]

Test Plan/Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
[e-mail]

Eurofins TestAmerica
5815 Middlebrook Pike
Knoxville, TN 37921
Kevin Woodcock
[e-mail]
[phone]

Page 98 of 109

Site Specific Test Plan
Table of Contents

AST-2024-1704 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1-1
1.1 Facility Descriptions ................................................................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Project Team ............................................................................................................................................... 1-1
1.3 Safety Requirements ................................................................................................................................... 1-1
2.0 Summary of Test Program .......................................................................................................................... 2-1
2.1 General Description ..................................................................................................................................... 2-1
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded ........................................................... 2-1
2.3 Proposed Test Schedule............................................................................................................................... 2-1
2.4 Emission Limits ........................................................................................................................................... 2-2
2.5 Test Report .................................................................................................................................................. 2-3
3.0 Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 3-1
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate ........ 3-1
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A – Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide ........................................................... 3-1
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content ............................................................................ 3-2
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 23/Alternative Method 034– Dioxins/Furans ....................................... 3-2
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 9 – Visible Emissions Evaluations ....................................................... 3-2
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control – U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A .......................................... 3-3
4.0 Quality Assurance Program ......................................................................................................................... 4-1
4.1 Equipment ................................................................................................................................................... 4-1
4.2 Field Sampling ............................................................................................................................................ 4-2
4.3 Analytical Laboratory.................................................................................................................................. 4-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1: Project Team ........................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Table 2-1: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule ........................................................................................ 2-2
Table 2-2: Emission Limits ...................................................................................................................................... 2-2
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................. 3-1
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Method 1 Data
Appendix B Example Calculations Sheets

Page 99 of 109

Site Specific Test Plan
Introduction

AST-2024-1704 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 1-1
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC (Hydro) to conduct
compliance testing at the Spanish Fork, Utah facility. Portions of the facility are subject to DAQE-AN108470016-22
and 40 CFR 63, Subpart RRR. Testing will be conducted to determine the emission rate of dioxins and furans (D/F)
from the exhaust of the Melting Furnace #21 at two (2) different feed/charge rates. Visible emissions evaluations
(VEE) will also be conducted at two (2) different feed rates.

This site-specific test plan (SSTP) has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of DAQE-
AN108470016-22 and 40 CFR 63, Subpart RRR.
1.1 Facility Descriptions
Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC (Hydro) operates a secondary aluminum production facility at 1550 North Hydro Way in
Spanish Fork, Utah County, Utah (Facility). Hydro currently operates extrusion, fabrication, finishing and cast house
services at the Facility. Clean charge and aluminum scrap are melted to produce aluminum alloys in the casting
process for use in the remainder of the Facility. The clean charge and aluminum scrap are melted in a natural gas-
fired melting furnace and then transferred to a holding furnace for alloying and fluxing. The molten aluminum is
refined further through several spinning nozzle inert flotation (SNIF) units prior to the casting of “logs” in the direct
chill casting units. The cast aluminum logs are heat treated in homogenizing furnaces and cut into “billets” prior to
use in subsequent extrusion operations. The logs or billets are then reheated in homogenizing furnaces before being
extruded into product shapes by extrusion presses. Extruded products are further processed through “aging” furnaces
to harden the aluminum and strengthen the extrusion.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table. Table 1-1: Project Team
Hydro Personnel Cecil Jacobson
Regulatory Agency UDAQ
Alliance Personnel Alan Jensen
other field personnel assigned at time of testing event
1.3 Safety Requirements
Testing personnel will undergo site-specific safety training for all applicable areas upon arrival at the site. Alliance
personnel will have current OSHA or MSHA safety training and be equipped with hard hats, safety glasses with side
shields, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fire resistant clothing, and fall protection (including shock corded
lanyards and full-body harnesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves in a manner consistent with Client and
Alliance’s safety policies.

A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader.

Page 100 of 109

Site Specific Test Plan
Summary of Test Programs

AST-2024-1704 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 2-1
2.0 Summary of Test Program
To satisfy the requirements of DAQE-AN108470016-22 and 40 CFR 63, Subpart RRR, the facility will conduct a
performance test program to determine the compliance status of the Melting Furnace #21.
2.1 General Description
All testing will be performed in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1, 2,
3 / 3A, 4, 23 / ALT-034, and 9. Table 2-1 presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program.
The following is a summary of the test objectives.

• Testing will be performed to demonstrate compliance with the DAQE-AN108470016-22 and 40 CFR 63,
Subpart RRR.
• Emissions testing will be conducted on the exhaust of Melting Furnace #21.
• Performance testing will be conducted at two (2) different feed/charge rates to be provided by Hydro on the
day of testing.
• Each of the test runs for the Melting Furnace will be approximately 180 minutes in duration per feed rate.
• One (1) VEE test run will be conducted for the different feed/charge rates.
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded
The following list identifies the measurements, observations and records that may be collected during the testing
program:

• Clean scrap feed/charge rate
• Painted scrap feed/charge weight
• Purchased scrap feed/charge weight
• Aluminum pucks feed/charge weight
• Batch number
• Batch start time
• Batch end time
2.3 Proposed Test Schedule
Table 2-1 presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program.
Page 101 of 109

Site Specific Test Plan
Summary of Test Programs

AST-2024-1704 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 2-2
Table 2-1: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule

Testing Location Parameter US EPA Method No. of Runs Run Duration Est. Onsite Time
DAY 1 – June 3, 2024
Equipment Setup & Pretest QA/QC Checks 6 hr
DAY 2 – June 4, 2024
Melting Furnace #21
2 Runs (Condition 1)
VFR 1-2
3 180 min 12 hr
O2/CO2 3/3A
BWS 4
D/F 23 / ALT-034
VEE 9 1 60 min
DAY 3 – June 5, 2024
Melting Furnace #21
1 Run (Condition 1)
1 Run (Condition 2)
VFR 1-2
3
(per feed rate)
180 min
(per feed rate)
8 hr
O2/CO2 3/3A
BWS 4
D/F 23 / ALT-034
VEE 9 1
(per feed rate)
60 min
(per feed rate)
DAY 4 – June 6, 2024
Melting Furnace #21
2 Runs (Condition 2)
VFR 1-2
3 180 min 12 hr
O2/CO2 3/3A
BWS 4
D/F 23 / ALT-034
VEE 9 1 60 min
DAY 5 – June 7, 2024
Contingency Day (if needed)
2.4 Emission Limits
Emission limits for each pollutant are below. Table 2-2: Emission Limits

Source Pollutant Citation
Melting Furnace #21
D/F – 15 µg of D/F TEQ per Mg of feed/charge 40 CFR Subpart RRR
VEE – 10% Permit

Page 102 of 109

Site Specific Test Plan
Summary of Test Programs

AST-2024-1704 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 2-3
2.5 Test Report
The final test report must be submitted within 60 days of the completion of the performance test and will include the
following information.
• Introduction – Brief discussion of project scope of work and activities.
• Results and Discussion – A summary of test results and process/control system operational data with
comparison to regulatory requirements or vendor guarantees along with a description of process conditions
and/or testing deviations that may have affected the testing results.
• Methodology – A description of the sampling and analytical methodologies.
• Sample Calculations – Example calculations for each target parameter.
• Field Data – Copies of actual handwritten or electronic field data sheets.
• Laboratory Data – Copies of laboratory report(s) and chain of custody(s).
• Quality Control Data – Copies of all instrument calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates.
• Process Operating/Control System Data – Process operating and control system data (as provided by Hydro)
to support the test results.

Page 103 of 109

Site Specific Test Plan
Testing Methodology

AST-2024-1704 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 3-1
3.0 Testing Methodology
This section provides a description of the sampling and analytical procedures for each test method that will be
employed during the test program. All equipment, procedures and quality assurance measures necessary for the
completion of the test program meet or exceed the specifications of each relevant test method. The emission testing
program will be conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1.

Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology

Parameter U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Volumetric Flow Rate 1 & 2 Full Velocity Traverses
Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide 3 / 3A Integrated Bag / Instrumental Analysis
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Dioxins / Furans 23 / ALT-034 Isokinetic Sampling
Visible Emissions Evaluations 9 Certified Observer

All stack diameters, depths, widths, upstream and downstream disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be
measured on site with an EPA Method 1 verification measurement provided by the Field Team Leader. These
measurements will be included in the test report.
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points will be selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances will be equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-1 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method
1.

Full velocity traverses will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system will consist of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature will be measured with a K-
type thermocouple and pyrometer.

Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings will be recorded during each test run. The data collected will be
utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A – Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3/3A. One (1) integrated Tedlar bag sample will be collected during each test run. The bags will be collected
from the positive pressure side of the sample pump and conditioner. They will be collected through a manifold with
a restriction (either rotometer or critical orifice) to ensure even filling throughout the course of the run. Samples will
be concurrent with the test runs. The bag samples will be analyzed on site with a gas analyzer. The remaining stack
gas constituent will be assumed to be nitrogen for the stack gas molecular weight determination. The quality control
measures are described in Section 3.6.
Page 104 of 109

Site Specific Test Plan
Testing Methodology

AST-2024-1704 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 3-2
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content will be determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train will consist of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger will be filled with a
known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger will be analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run
on the same analytical balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 23/Alternative Method 034– Dioxins/Furans
The dioxins and furans testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 23 with
guidance from Alternative Method 034. The sampling system will consist of a Teflon-coated nozzle, heated glass-
lined probe, glass filter holder with pre-cleaned heated glass-fiber filter, condenser coil, XAD resin trap, gas
conditioning train, pump and calibrated dry gas meter. The gas conditioning system will consist of five (5) chilled
impingers. The first impinger will be empty. The next two (2) impingers each will contain 100 mL of water. The
fourth impinger will be empty while the fifth impinger will be charged with 200-300 grams of silica gel. The probe
liner and filter heating systems will be maintained at a temperature of 120 ± 14°C (248 ±25°F), and the impinger
temperature will be maintained below at 20°C (68°F) or less throughout testing.

Method 23 Section 6.1.7 requires the condenser to be oriented at an angle to cause moisture to flow down to the XAD
adsorbent module to facilitate condensate drainage. Glassware with this configuration is not currently available from
a national supplier utilizing a large enough condenser to meet the temperature specifications of the method. Alliance
will continue to work with manufacturers, but until equipment is widely available, the horizontal or vertical condenser
configuration from traditional Method 23 will be utilized.

All glassware leading to the XAD adsorbing resin trap will be cleaned and sealed before mobilizing to the site. The
sampling train will be assembled in the sample recovery area. The pre-cleaned quartz filter will be placed in a glass
filter holder with a Teflon filter support and connected to the condenser coil. All open ends of the sampling train will
be sealed with Teflon tape prior to complete assembly at the sampling location.

Following the completion of each test run, the sampling train will be leak checked at vacuum pressure greater than or
equal to the highest vacuum pressure observed during the run and the contents of the impingers will be measured for
moisture gain. The filter will be removed from the filter holder and placed in sample container 1. The XAD sorbent
module will be sealed on both ends and placed on ice. The nozzle, probe liner, filter holder, condenser and all
connecting glassware will be triple-rinsed and brushed with acetone followed by toluene, and these rinses will be
recovered in sample container 2. All containers will be sealed, labeled and liquid levels marked for transport to the
identified laboratory for analysis.

Method 23 Section 8.2.9 has the impinger water and solvent rinses collected in a single container (No. 3). Due to
analytical method development constraints of the subcontracted laboratory, it is necessary to split this recovery
between two containers: condensate (Container No. 3a) and solvent rinses (Container No. 3b).
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 9 – Visible Emissions Evaluations
The stack gas opacity will be determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test 9. Visible emission evaluations
will be conducted by a certified visible emissions evaluator. Opacity readings will be recorded in 15-second intervals
during each of one (1) 60-minute evaluation per feed rate.
Page 105 of 109

Site Specific Test Plan
Testing Methodology

AST-2024-1704 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 3-3
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control – U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A
Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol 1 (+/- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates will
be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report.

Low Level gas will be introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will be recorded. This process will be
repeated for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration gases will be
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. The Calibration Error for each gas must be within 2.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5% absolute difference.

A Data Acquisition System with battery backup will be used to record the instrument response in one (1) minute
averages. The data will be continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At
the completion of testing, the data will also be saved to the Alliance server. All data will be reviewed by the Field
Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance’s office, all written and electronic data will be
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review will be performed by the Project Manager.

Page 106 of 109

Site Specific Test Plan
Quality Assurance Program

AST-2024-1704 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 4-1
4.0 Quality Assurance Program
Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Management Plan to ensure the
continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and
procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme.
Adherence to prescribed procedures is quite often the most applicable QC check.
4.1 Equipment
Field test equipment is assigned a unique, permanent identification number. Prior to mobilizing for the test program,
equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipment problems prior to arriving on site. This minimizes
lost time on the job site due to equipment failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is unavoidable despite the
most rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures. Therefore, replacements for critical equipment or components
are brought to the job site. Equipment returning from the field is inspected before it is returned to storage. During
the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and recalibrated where necessary.

Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. The
calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA-600/R-94/038c, September 1994) are utilized.
When these methods are inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recognized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked
for completeness and accuracy. Copies of calibration forms are included in the report.

The following sections elaborate on the calibration procedures followed by Alliance for these items of equipment.

• Dry Gas Meter and Orifice. A full meter calibration using critical orifices as the calibration standard is
conducted at least semi-annually, more frequently if required. The meter calibration procedure determines
the meter correction factor (Y) and the meter’s orifice pressure differential (ΔH@). Alliance uses approved
Alternative Method 009 as a post-test calibration check to ensure that the correction factor has not changed
more than 5% since the last full meter calibration. This check is performed after each test series.
• Pitot Tubes and Manometers. Type-S pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria required by U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.84 unless a specific coefficient has been determined
from a wind tunnel calibration. If a specific coefficient from a wind tunnel calibration has been obtained that
coefficient will be used in lieu of 0.84. Standard pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria required by U.S.
EPA Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.99. Any pitot tubes not meeting the appropriate
geometric criteria are discarded and replaced. Manometers are verified to be level and zeroed prior to each
test run and do not require further calibration.
• Temperature Measuring Devices. All thermocouple sensors mounted in Dry Gas Meter Consoles are
calibrated semi-annually with a NIST-traceable thermocouple calibrator (temperature simulator) and verified
during field use using a second NIST-traceable meter. NIST-traceable thermocouple calibrators are
calibrated annually by an outside laboratory.
• Nozzles. Nozzles are measured three (3) times prior to initiating sampling with a caliper. The maximum
difference between any two (2) dimensions is 0.004 in.
• Digital Calipers. Calipers are calibrated annually by Alliance by using gage blocks that are calibrated
annually by an outside laboratory.
Page 107 of 109

Site Specific Test Plan
Quality Assurance Program

AST-2024-1704 Hydro – Spanish Fork, UT Page 4-2
• Barometer. The barometric pressure is obtained from a nationally recognized agency or a calibrated
barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field trip against a mercury barometer. The
barometer is acceptable if the values agree within ± 2 percent absolute. Barometers not meeting this
requirement are adjusted or taken out of service.
• Balances and Weights. Balances are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory. A functional check is
conducted on the balance each day it is use in the field using a calibration weight. Weights are re-certified
every two (2) years by an outside laboratory or internally. If conducted internally, they are weighed on a
NIST traceable balance. If the weight does not meet the expected criteria, they are replaced.
• Other Equipment. A mass flow controller calibration is conducted on each Environics system annually
following the procedures in the Manufacturer’s Operation manual. A methane/ethane penetration factor
check is conducted on the total hydrocarbon analyzers equipped with non-methane cutters every six (6)
months following the procedures in 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ. Other equipment such as probes, umbilical
lines, cold boxes, etc. are routinely maintained and inspected to ensure that they are in good working order.
They are repaired or replaced as needed.
4.2 Field Sampling
Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test
method(s). General QC measures for the test program include:
• Cleaned glassware and sample train components will be sealed until assembly.
• Sample trains will be leak checked before and after each test run.
• Appropriate probe, filter and impinger temperatures will be maintained.
• The sampling port will be sealed to prevent air from leaking from the port.
• Dry gas meter, ΔP, ΔH, temperature and pump vacuum data will be recorded during each sample point.
• An isokinetic sampling rate of 90-110% will be maintained, as applicable.
• All raw data will be maintained in organized manner.
• All raw data will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability.
4.3 Analytical Laboratory
Analytical laboratory selection for sample analyses is based on the capabilities, certifications and accreditations that
the laboratory possesses. An approved analytical laboratory subcontractor list is maintained with a copy of the
certificate and analyte list as evidence of compliance. Alliance assumes responsibility to the client for the
subcontractor’s work. Alliance maintains a verifiable copy of the results with chain of custody documentation.

Page 108 of 109

Last Page of Report

Page 109 of 109