DAQ-2025-001848

1

DAQC-1259-24
Site ID 10346 (B4)
MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – KENNECOTT UTAH COPPER – Refinery Combined Heat
and Power Unit (REFCHP)

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: December 26, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: REFCHP
Contact: Sean Daly: 801-204-2563
Location: Kennecott Smelter Facility, Magna, Salt Lake County, UT
Test Contractor: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
FRS ID #: UT0000004903500030
Permit/AO#: Title V Operating Permit 3500030004, last revised
September 27, 2022
Action Code: TR
Subject: Review of Stack Test Report dated December 18, 2024

On December 18, 2024, DAQ received a test report for the Kennecott Utah Copper Refinery’s REFCHP.
Testing was performed on November 20 and 21, 2024, to demonstrate compliance with the emission
limits found in Permit Conditions: II.B.48.a, II.B.48.b, II.B.48.d, and II.B.48.e. The test results are:

Source Test Date RM/Pollutant DAQ Result Test Result Limit

REFCHP 11/20/2024 7E/NOx 1.65 lbs/hr 1.6 lbs/hr 5.96 lbs/hr
Combined 10/CO 1.25 lbs/hr 1.2 lbs/hr 6.43 lbs/hr

REFCHP 11/20/2024 7E/NOx 10 ppm* 10 ppm* 25 ppm*
Turbine

REFCHP 11/21/2024 7E/NOx 5.94 lbs/hr 5.9 lbs/hr 7.49 lbs/hr
Burner 34 ppm* 34 ppm* 54 ppm*
10/CO 2.3 lbs/hr 2.3 lbs/hr 2.5 lbs/hr

*@ 15% O2

DEVIATIONS: No deviations reported.

CONCLUSION: The stack emissions test report appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: Kennecott Utah Copper appears to be in compliance with the
applicable conditions of the Title V operating permit at the time
of this test.

6 3
2

HPV: No violations occurred.

ATTACHMENT: Stack test report dated December 18, 2024, DAQ spreadsheets
Hfl'/.or{)r.-t;,F+.o
Rio Tinto Kennecott
47oo Daybreak Parkway
South Jordan, Utah 84oo9
T 8or-S6g-Zg8g
F 8or-s6g-6688
Matt Tobey
General Manager, Metals
o<rr*\</ t4r 'LoZ'l Aqn / d
DEC
,l1,tefeJ
1 B 2024
.)r',,t.it()N OF AIR OUALIWMr. Bryce Bird, Director
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
PO Box L4482o
Salt Lake City, Utah 84u4-482o
Attn: Mr. Paul Morris
Subject:Stack Test Reports - Kennecott Utah Copper Refinery
Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHP)
Title V Operating Permit No. ssooogoooa
Dear Mr. Bird,
As required by Title V operating permit 35ooo3ooo4 and Approval Order DAQE-
ANro346oo58-2o, Kennecott Utah Copper performed stack testing of the
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHP) on November 2c,2o24.The
testing was conducted following procedures outlined in 4o CFR 6o, Appendix A.
The summary report with test results is attached for submittal within 6o days of
completion of the testing. Results of the testing demonstrate that the units are in
compliance with the permit emission limits.
Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements
and information contained in this document are true, accurate, and complete
(RSoz-+rs-Sd).
Should you have any questions or need further information regarding these
reports, please feel free to contact me or Sean Daly at 801-204-2561.
i',,1 itlM! l'JI OF
]NII,II NIAL OUALITY
General Manager, Metals
F
-.o
-.1lr.
-JF+.o
(This page intentionallA left blank)
Almre
Source Test Report
Rio Tinto Kennecott
4700 Daybreak Parkway
South Jordan, UT 84095
Source Tested: REFCHP
Test Dates: November20 8.21,2024
Project No. AST-2024-45 50
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
u-tAu nrPnRIMi:N-t oF
t]IVISION OF AIR OIIALITY
Source Tesl Reporl
Test Program Summary
Regulatory Information
Permit Nos.
Regulatory Citation
Source Information
DAQE-ANo r 03460058-20
Title V 3500030004
40 CFR 60, Subpart KKKK
Source Name
Power Unit
Contact Information
Source ID
REFCT{P
Target Parameters
NOx, CO
Test Location
Rio Tinto Kennecott
2500 South 9180 West
Magna, UT 84044
Jenny Esker
j enny. esker@riotinto. com
(801) s69-6494
Sean Daly
sean.daly3 @riotinto.com
(801)204-2s63
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
charles.horton@all iancetg.com
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Austin Mayfield
austin.mayfi eld@alliancetg. com
(s0l) 8s8-7686
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie. shonk@alliancetg. com
(812) 4s2-4785
Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
[e-mail]
Report Reviewer
Sarah Perry
[e-mail]
AST-2024-4s50
r.llAlialpe Source Test Report
C erti/ication Statement
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
12t12t2024
Charles Horton, QSTI
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Date
AST-2024-4550 RTK - Magna, UT Page ii
t.f,AlialpE)Source Tesl Report
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
l.l Process/Control System Descriptions. ..................... l-l
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification.................. ....................... l-l
3.I U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3,{ - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide........ ............ 3- l
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides ............ 3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l0 - Carbon Monoxide.... ......3-l
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 - Volumetric Flow Rate ............. ........... 3-l
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification. ........................3-2
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A, l0 and 7E..........................3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-l: Summary of Results - Combined Heat and Power.......... ........2-l
Table2-2: Summary of Results - Turbine On1y............. ......2-l
Table 2-3: Summary of Results - Duct Bumers Only............. ..................2-2
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix D Process Operating/Control System Data
RTK - Magna, UTAST-2024-4550 Page iii
{)Aliatpe Source Test Report
lntrodilclion
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Rio Tinto Kennecott (RTK) to conduct compliance
testing at the Refinery located in Magna, Utah. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of the Utah
Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Approval Order (AO) DAQE-
AN0103460058-20 and the Title V Operating Permit 3500030004. Testing was conducted to determine the
emission rates of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO) Ilom the exhaust of REFCHP - Power Unit at
three (3) operating conditions: turbine-only, duct bumers-only, and combined-cycle. The turbine-only condition is
subject to 40 CFR 60, Subpart KKKK per Title V permit condition II.B.48.e.
l.l Process/ControlSystemDescriptions
REFCHP - Power Unit description: The unit consists of a Solar Taurus 70 turbine generator and TEG firing duct
bumers. In March 2014, the original duct bumer was removed, and a redesigned duct bumer was installed at the
CHP. With the installation of the redesigned duct bumer, the total heat input capacity for the combined heat and
power system is 110.3 million British thermalunits per hour (MMBut/hr). The unit is designed to operate in one of
three modes: Combined-Cycle, Turbine-Only, and Duct Burner-Only. All testing will be conducted at 90o/o or
greater ofthe production capacity ofthe unit.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-l: Project Team
RTK Personnel Sean Daly
Alliance Personnel Austin Mayfield
Connor Rasmussen
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by RTK.
RTK - Magna, UTAsr-2024-4550 Page l-l
Allalpe Source Tesl Report
Summary, e/ Qdv115
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the RTK facility in Magna, Utah on November 20 and 21,2024. Testing
consisted of determining the emission rates of NOx and CO from the exhaust of REFCHP - Power Unit at three (3)
conditions: turbine-only, duct burner only and combined-cycle.
Tables 2- I through 2-3 provide summaries of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable UDAQ
and Title V permit limits. Any difference between the summary results listed in the following tables and the
detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-l: Summary of Results - Combined Heat and Power
Table 2-2t Summary of Results - Turbine Only
lun Number Run I Run 2 Run 3 Averaqe
)ate ttn024 nn0n4 nn0n4
itart Time
ind Time
I l:09
l2:12
l2:20
l3: l9
l3:30
l4.29
t{itrogen Oxides Data
Concenhation, ppmvd
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Limit, lb/hr
Percent of Limit, %
17.41
r.3
23.34
1.8
22.81
1.7
21.19
1.6
5.96
28
larbon Monoxide Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Limit, lb/hr
Percent of Limit, Yo
28.24
1.3
25.50
1.2
25.45
1.2
26.40
1.2
6.43
l9
lun Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
)atc trn0n4 trD0n4 ttD0n4
itart Time
Dnd Time
l5:05
l5:24
l5:32
I 5:51
I 5:59
l6:18
{itrogen Oxides Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Concentration, ppmvd @ 15% Oz
Emission Limit, ppmvd @ 15%Oz
Percent of Limit, 7o
5.40
10.39
5.05
10.00
4.77
9.60
5.07
r0.00
25
40
AST-2024-4550 RTK - Magna, UT Page 2-l
Allarpe Source Test Reporl
Summary of Results
Table 2-3: Summary of Results - Duct Burners Only
l,un Number Run I Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date Intn4 ttmn4 tntn4
itart Time
Dnd Time
9:01
l0:00
l0: l3
I l:12
I l:24
l2:23
\itrogen Oxides Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Concentration, ppmvd @ 15% Ot
Emission Limit, ppmvd @ l5% Ot
Percent of Limit, %
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Limit, lb/hr
Percent of Limit, %
22.07
37.58
6.4
18.56
32.03
5.6
18.75
33.38
5.7
19.79
34.33
54
64
5.9
7.49
79
arbon Monoxide Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Limit, lb/hr
Percent of Limit, %
13.23
2.3
13. l8
2.4
10.88
2.0
12.43
2.3
2.5
90
AST-2024-4550 RTK - Magna. UT Page 2-2
AIlatpe
Source Tesl Reporl
Testing \ttelhodolon'
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix C.
Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodology
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3A,. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a
stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides
The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E. Data
was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe,
Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a
non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used,
then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon
sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l0 - Carbon Monoxide
The carbon monoxide (CO) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10. Data
was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe,
Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system, and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a
non-contact condenser used to remove moisture fiom the gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used, then a
portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample
line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l9 - Volumetric Flow Rate
The gas volumetric flow rate was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 using the
measured oxygen concentration, the published fuel factor, a calibrated gas meter and the fuel heating value.
Parameter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Instrumental Analysis
Nitrogen Oxides 7E lnstrumental Analysis
Carbon Monoxide l0 Instrumental Analysis
Volumetric Flow Rate l9 Fuel Factors/Heat Inputs
Gas Dilution System Certification 205
AST-2024-4550 RTK - Magna, UT Page 3-l
Aliatpe
Source Tesl Report
Testing Methodologv
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification
A calibration gas dilution system field check was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method 205.
An initial three (3) point calibration was conducted, using individual Protocol I gases, on the analyzer used to
complete the dilution system field check. Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates were utilized to force the
dilution system to perform two dilutions on each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases was sent
directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. A mid-level supply gas,
with a cylinder concentration within l0% of one of the gas divider settings described above, was introduced directly
to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and
the analyzer response agreed within 2Yo. These steps were repeated three (3) times. The average analyzer response
agreed within 2Yo of the predicted gas concentration. No single injection differed more than 2Yo from the average
instrument response for that dilution. Copies of the Method 205 data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality
Control Appendix.
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A, l0 and 7E
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol I (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5
ppmv absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppm (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was
recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to
decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppm (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low-Level
gas was zero gas, the response was 0.5 ppm or 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration (whichever was less
restrictive). The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded. The
measurement system response time and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias was
within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and
System Bias were repeated.
Drift befween pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3% of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv absolute
difference. If the drift exceeded 3Yo or 0.5 ppmv, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated.
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The
pollutant concentrations were measured at three points (16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each
haverse point was sampled for a minimum of twice the system response time.
AST-2024-4550 RTK - Magna, UT Page 3-2
Aliatpe Source Test Report
Testing Methodologlt
If the pollutant concentration at each traverse point did not differ more than 5 percent or 0.5 ppmv/0.3% (whichever
was less restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling was conducted during the test
runs. If the pollutant concentration did not meet these specifications but differed less than l0 percent or 1.0
ppmvl0.5Yo from the average concentration, then three (3) point sampling was conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in
diameter - 16.7,50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter - 0.4, 1.0,
and 2.0 meters from the stack wall). If the pollutant concentration differed by more than l0 percent or 1.0
ppmvl}.SYo from the average concentration, then sampling was conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) kaverse
points. Copies of stratification check data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
An NOz - NO converter check was be performed on the analyzer prior to initiating testing and at the completion of
testing. An approximately 50 ppm nitrogen dioxide cylinder gas was introduced directly to the NOx analyzer and
the instrument response was recorded in an electronic data sheet. The instrument response was within +i- l0 percent
of the cylinder concentration.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
AST-2024-4550 RTK - Magna, UT Page 3-3
AliarEe Example Calculations
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No. : AS!-!Q!!!!!q
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 3,{
Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Qs), dscfm
Qs=
FpxFsyxFdx (rffi)
l.0E+06 x 60
where,FR 32,310 : fuel rate, scfttFHvT8-: fuelheating value, Btn/scf
Fpu",o,
-,7TF
: fuel factor, dscf/MMBtuCo2-lT: oxygen concentration, o/o
Qs 10,764 : dscfrn
Or - Outlet Concentration (Co), Y, dry
Co,: (Cou,-Co)x ( fr;)
where,Cob, I I .43 = average analyzer value during test, %o dry
C"
-03T-
: average of pretest & posttest zero response s, Yo dry
CMA-TmT-: actual concentration of calibration gas,oh dry
CM
-T0T-
: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, %o dry
Cq,-TI36-: O, Concentration, % dry
COr - Outlet Concentration (Cco,), oh dry
Cco,: (Cou,-Co)* ( #..)
where,Cob, 5.26 : average analyzer value during test, % dry
C"---0-8-: average of pretest & posttest zero responses,Yo dry
CMA
-T0:00-:
actual concentration of calibration gas, Yo dry
CM-T0T-: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, 7o dry
Cco,.-j3i-: COz Concentration, 7o dry
Alialpe Example Calculations
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: REFCHP
Project No.: AST-2024-4550
Run No. /Method Run I / Method l0
CO - Outlet Concentration (Cco), ppmvd
Cco: (Co6,-C6)x 1 -U-,a"-"1
where,Cob, 28.36 : average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co-:T0-: average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA-T5:ffi-: actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM-TtTi-: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
Cco-T: CO Concentration, ppmvd
CO - Outlet Concentration (Cco.rs), ppmvd @ l5o/o Ot
7 70.9_15 1Lco"rs= Lcox \ 209_Oil
where,Cco 28.24 : CO - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
Co,
-Tf36-
: oxygen concentration, 7o
Cco",, 17.46 :ppmvd @15%O,
CO - Outlet Emission Rate (ERsq),lb/hr
nin L
oo _- _ Cco x MW x Qs x 60; x28.32 fa-rtao -
where,Cco 28.24 : CO - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
Mw-5.01-: Co molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 10,764 : stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfinERco-T-: lb/hr
Example CalculationsAliarpe
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source: REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No.: AST-2024-4550
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 7E
NOx - Outlet Concentration (Cps*), ppmvd
Cro*= (co6,-cs)x (*ftJ)
where,Cob, 17.45 : average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co-T-: average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA-TIOT-: actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM
-TsTil
: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CNo*
-TUT-
: NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Concentration (C;is*.15), ppmvd @ lloh O,
CNoxcrs: CNo* - (#
where,CNo* 17.41 = NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
Co,
-Tm-
: oxygen concentration, 7o
CNoxcrs 10.76 : ppmvd @15% Oz
NOx - Outlet Emission Rate (ERN6,), lb/hr
oo._ - CNo*xMWxQsx60H x28.32 #-t.NO* -
where,CNo, 17.41 : NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 46.0055 : NOx molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 10,764 = stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfrnERNS*-T3-= lb/hr
Emissions CalculationsAIiatrceLocation Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No. AST-2024-+S56
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Averase
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
tU20t24 ty20t24 tU20t24
I l:09 12:20 13:30
12:12 13: 19 14:29
Source Data
Fuel Heating Value, Btu/scf
Fuel Factor (O2 dry), dscf,MMBtu
Fuel Rate, KscIh
Fn,
Fd
FR
1,048
8,710
32.31
1.048
8,7 l0
32.30
1,048
8,710
32.1 8
1,048
8,710
32.26
Input Data - Outlet
Volumetric Flow Rate (Ml9), dscfm Qs 10,764 11,023 10,688 10,825
Calculated Data - Outlet
O, Concentration, o/o dry co, l 1.36 I 1.58 I 1.33 1t.42
COz Concentration, % dry cco, 5.19 5.16 5.19 5.18
CO Concentration, ppmvd
CO Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 o/o Oz
CO Emission Rate, lb/hr
Cco
Cco"tt
ERco
28.24
17.46
1.3
2s.50
16.15
1.2
25.45
r 5.68
1.2
26.40
16.43
1.2
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 o/o Oz
NOx Emission Rate, lb/hr
CNo*
CNoxc I 5
ERNo*
17.4\
r0.76
1.3
23.34
14.78
1.8
22.81
14.06
t.7
2t.19
13.20
1.6
AlErce Runl-RMData
IFT tti at"l i-Dnrl':
Itrrtiotr; Rro Tinto Kcmccott -
Source: REFCHP - Coml
Projcct No.: AST-2024-4550
fime
Unit
O' - Outlet COr - Outlci CO - Outlct
'/o dry o/o dry ppmvdValid V6lid Valid
NOr - Oualet
ppmvd
Velid
Utrcorrca€d Ruo Averege (C6)
Crl G.s CoocentntioD (Cu)
Pr€a€st System Z€ro Rerporle
Posttgt Syltem Zero RgpoNe
Averrge Zcro Rapoore (Co)
Prct6t Systcm Crl R6ponsc
Posttelt Syltem Crl R6pon!€
Averrge Crl Raponsc (Cy)
I 1.43
10.00
0.00
0.00
000
10.08
10.05
10.07
ll36
526
10.00
0.16
0.00
008
10.t0
10.03
10.0?
519
28 36
r500
0.20
000
010
15.15
15.07
15 lt
2424
17.45
15.00
0.10
000
0.05
15.08
15.01
l5 05
t7 4t
I 1:09
I l:10
ll:ll
lt.t2
ll:13
ll:14
ll:15
I l:16
ll:17
ll:18
ll:19
I l:20
I l:21
I l:22
I1.23
|.24
1t.25
tt 26
tt.27
I l:28
I l:29
I l:30
I l:31
I l:32
t l;33
I l:34
I l:35
I l:36
ll:17
I l:38
I l:39
I l:40
I l:41
I l:42
I l:43
ll:44
I l:45
ll146
tt.4'l
llr48
I l:49
I l:50
I l;51
tt.52
ll:53
I l:54
I l:55
I l:56
I l:57
I l:5E
I l:59
l2:00
12:01
t2.02
l2:O3
t2.M
12.o5
t2.06
t2.07
l2:08
I 1.46
I 1.45
I 1.45
I t.48
I t.44
ll43
|.41
u.46
I 1.50
I 1.43
I 1.46
ll43
I 1.46
I 1.45
I 1.46
I 1.45
1 1.45
I t.48
n.42
I t.45
I 1.43
ll44
t1.44
I1.44
I 1.45
I 1.40ll4l
I 1.48
tt 44fi 4'7
ll.+4
1.42
I 1.43
|.42
ll46
|.43
n.44
I 1.46
I 1.,14
I 1.40
I 1.45ll46
I t.44
lt40
I t.39
I 1.,14ll4l
ll40ll39
ll40
ll36
1 1.43
I l.4l
1 1.43
1 1.40
|.42
1 1.39
1 t.39
I t.38
I 1.40
5.31
5.31
5 3l
5.28
5.31
5.31
529
5.29
5.2'7
5.31
5.29
5.30
5.29
530
5.28
5.29
5.29
5.2'l
5.30
5.28
5.29
5.28
5.28
5.27
5.27
5.29
5.29
5.25
5.27
5.25
5.27
524
5.21
5.27
525
5.26
5.25
5.24
5.25
5.27
5.24
5.24
5.24
5.26
5.26
s.23
5.23
s.25
5.25
5.24
5.25
5.22
5.23
5.22
5.23
5.21
5.23
5.23
s.23
5.22
27.06
26.4
27 46
27.40
28.53
27.78
25.89
2'1.32
27.25
29.05
27.55
27.47
21.94
28.t6
25'74
2'7.59
2'7.86
28.70
29.O7
29.34
28.22
28.43
27 6'l
28.3t
26.75
26.93
29.38
27.86
28 t'7
27.48
2'1.99
29 tl
29 59
29.27
29.26
27.30
28.10
24.42
29.59
27.81
21.17
26.94
30.r5
28.06
30 50
28.65
27.34
31.00
30.20
30.56
28 26
28 8l
25 55
21.53
28.39
27.04
29.4t
31.03
29.46
fi.24
ll63
l2 08
r2 30
12.'75
t3.12
13.33
13.68
13.80
14.13
14.36
14.74
14.78
15.00
15.14
l 5.35
15.48
t5 62
I s.E3
r6.02
16. ls
l6 36
l6 56
16.73
11 04
I'1.40
t1.52
17.50
t7.E2
t'l.72
18.00
18.21
t8.42
18.40
18.43
18.66
l 8.86
l 8.84
l8 97
t9 20
t9. l4
19.25
l9 28
l9 49
I9 60
19.58
19.61
t9.'79
19.88
I9,EE
l9 93
19.84
20.05
20.12
20.o3
20 04
20 33
20 40
20 34
20.36
Afarcet.
Run2-RMData
i I ll .'
lrcrtioo:
Source:
Projcct No.!
Drte:
REFCHP - Combined
Rro Tinto Kemecon - South Jordm. UT
Time
Urit
Strtu!
Or - Outlet
o/o dry
COr - Ortlet
o/" dry
Valid
5 18
t0 00
0.00
0.00
000
t0.03
10.06
l0 05
5.19
5 t'7
5.19
521
5.18
520
5.20
5.19
5.18
5.18
520
5.19
5.t1
5.t'7
5.18
5.18
5.18
5.18
5.18
5.t'7
5.18
5.16
517
5.t'l
5.16
5.t'7
518
5. l9
5.t'7
5.19
519
5.19
5.18
5.18
5lE
5.1?
519
5.17
5. l8
5.16
5.19
5.2t
519
5.18
5. t8
5.18
517
5. l8
5.t'1
5.18
5. l9
5 t'7
5. l8
5. l7
5.18
5t7
5.18
5.16
515
5.1?
CO - Outlea NOr - Outletppmvd ppmvd
Valid Valid
25.66
15 00
0.00
0.00
000
15.07
15.l2
15.l0
26.92
25.49
26.O2
24.67
24.48
23.0',7
24.64
24.03
25.08
22.82
25.34
23.82
24.32
24.60
25.20
24.60
26.24
24.34
22 68
23.66
24.19
26.56
26 44
25.O2
25.48
24.38
2't 32
24.70
26.O2
25.54
26 tO
28.31
25.94
2"t.o5
25.04
25.32
26.78
25.26
26.t I
26.5'7
25.54
24.83
25 75
2't.33
27.2'7
26.88
25 68
26 54
24.62
24 22
26.56
26.19
27 t6
25.83
26 40
28 24
27.86
25.8'7
29.35
27.42
23.22
23 31
21.59
24.t8
24.t4
24 30
24 1a
24'79
24.57
24 34
23 94
23'77
23 17
23 62
23 5'l
23 6t
23.49
23.49
23 42
23 29
23 36
23 t6
23 35
23 27
23 26
23 t4
23 0r
23.27
23 09
27 34
23 24
23 36
23 32
23 32
27 29
23 t2
23 26
23.32
23 34
23 24
23 4t
23.40
23 30
23 t9
23 l7
23n
23 08
23 20
23 18
23 32
23 27
23 2t
23 24
23 25
23 JO
23 18
23 30
23 l
23 t4
23 43
Urcorrsted Rua Avengc (Co6)
C.l Grs Corc€narrtion (Cr6)
Pretelt System Z€ro Reponse
Polttelt Syltem Zero R6potr3e
Averrge Zero Rapoarc (Co)
Prcagt Syltem Crl Rqponle
Poltt6t System Crl Reponse
Average Crl Reponse (Cy)
1 r.63
10.00
000
000
000
l0 05
I 0.04
10.05
23 45
l5 00
000
000
000
l5 0l
l5 l3
15.07
t2.20
l2:21
12.22
t2 23
12.24
12.2s
l2:26
l2:2'7
l2:28
12 29
l2:30
l2:31
t2.32
l2:33
l2:34
l2:35
12.36
12.31
l2:38
t2 39
12.40
12.4t
l2:42
t2 43
t2 44
l2:45
t2.46
12:47
l2:48
12.49
l2:50
l2:51
12:52
12:53
12:54
12:55
12.56
t2 51
12.58
t2 59
13 00
l3 0l
13 02
13r03
l3:04
13r05
I 3.06
l3:07
l3:08
l3:09
l3:10
l3:l I
13.12
l3:13
l3:14
l3:15
l3:16
l3:17
l3:18
13:19
I t.6llt66
ll64
ll60
ll65
ll 63
1 1.62
ll64
lt66
ll65
I t.62
lt63
Il 66
lt 64
|62
1 1.62
n62
ll 63
n62
1 1.65
il.63
Il 65
il.63
1 1.64
Il65Il 64
il63
il.60
ll65
lL62
il62
l.62
I 1.64
ll64
n.65
I 1.66
ll63
1 1.67
n.65
I 1.6?
il.61
ll59
il62
I 1.64
1 1.66
1 1.65
ll67
I 1.6,4
1 1.65
1.62
il63
I 1.65
1.62
ll64
I l.6t
n.62
I 1.60
I 1.64
lt 66
I l.6l
AlErce Run3-RMData
thr CAt r; i () l. , :-'
Ircrtiotr: fuo Tinto Kemecott - South Jordan UT
Sora"at
Pr^i.". I".
Dttct lll2O/24
Time
Unit
Strtus
Or - Outlet COr - Outlet CO - Outlct NOr - Oualct
Y. dry o/o dry ppmvd ppmvdVdid Valid Valid Valid
UncorrBted Rltr Avcrege (C5)
Crl G$ Conccntrrtion (CE{)
Pret6t SytteB Zcro Rerpoose
Polatgt Syslem Z€ro R6potrsc
Averege Zero Reponre (Co)
Prctst Syst€n Csl Rdpon3e
Polaagt Sysaem C8l Rqporle
Avcregc Crl Rcpoue (Cy)
I 1.36
10.00
0.00
000
0.00
10.04
10.01
10.03
I 1.33
52t
10.00
000
000
000
10.06
10.02
l0 04
5.19
25 57
l5 00
0.00
000
0.00
15.t2
15 02
t 5.07
25.45
22.88
15.00
0.00
0.00
000
15.t3
14.95
l5 04
22.81Corrsted Rutr
13 30
l3 3l
t3.32
l3:33
13 34
13r35
l3:36
t3.37
l3:38
I 3:39
l3:40
l3:41
13:42
l3:41
13:44
l3:45
l3:46
13.4'7
l3:48
l3:49
l3:50
l3:51
13.52
13:53
t3.54
l3:55
l3:56
t1 5'7
l3:58
I 3:59
l4:00
l4:Ol
t4.02
l4:03
14r04
l4:05
l4:06
t4.07
l4:08
l4:09
l4: l0
l4:ll
14.t2
l4:13
l4:14
l4:15
l4:16
t4.t7
l4:18
l4:19
l4:20
14.21
l4:22
t4 23
t4 24
14.25
l4:26
t4 2'l
l4:2E
14 29
1 1.34
I l.14
I 1.34
I 1.38
It 35
I 1.35
I 1.34
lt 33
I 1.38
ll34
I 1.36
I 1.35
I 1.36
I 1.33
I 1.34
l 1.34
I 1.35
ll36
I 1.38
I 1.32
I 1.35
ll34
I 1.34
I 1.40
I t.36
I 1.33
I 1.34
I 1.35
I 1.34
I 1.35
u.33
1 1.36
I 1.3?
1t.32
I 1.34
1 1.37
I 1.37
I 1.38
il.36
I 1.34
I 1.34
tt.37
I 1.38
l.37
I 1.36
I 1.38
1 1.39
n.37
1 1.36
I 1.40
I t.37
I 1.35
I 1.37
I 1.39
I t.34
I 1.38
I 1.33
I 1.34
I 1.35ll t6
s.25
5.25
5.26
5.23
5.25
s.25
5.25
5.25
5.23
5.24
5.23
5.24
523
5.24
5.23
5.23
5.22
5.22
5.2t
524
5.22
5.23
5.22
519
s.2t
5.23
5.2t
5.22
522
5.2t
5.22
5.21
5.20
5.22
52t
5. l9
5. l9
5.19
5.20
52t
5.2t
5.19
5. l9
5. l9
5.20
5.18
518
519
5.20
5.18
5.20
5.20
5.l9
5.19
5.21
5.l9
5.22
521
5.2t
s.2t
25.68
24.25
26.t9
26.68
25.60
25.38
25.01
25.56
24.55
26.97
26.08
24.83
26 3'7
25.65
24.t2
24.76
25.ts
24.15
25.7'7
25.33
25.96
25.'t4
25.62
26.44
24.8t
27.6t
25 85
26.5'l
25't7
25.43
27.41
24.'t8
25.51
2't.t5
26'76
25.10
24.13
26.36
2't.46
25.17
26.38
25.29
25.12
25.36
25.34
25.57
24 t3
24.5E
24.18
24.60
26.1'l
25.09
24.26
25.78
25.09
27.16
25.9t
25.06
24.70
24.39
22.48
22.52
22.50
22.32
22.47
22.40
22.4'7
22.53
22 41
22 66
22.54
22.62
22.49
22.83
22.64
22.7 |
22.'n
22.78
22.5t
22.87
22.'74
22.82
22.86
22.15
22.74
22.95
22.95
22.94
22.94
22.91
23.15
22.99
22.84
23.05
23.08
23.00
23.O'7
22.84
22.97
22.99
23.00
22.99
22.9'7
23.1 1
23.M
23.t2
23.12
23.t9
23.19
23.04
23.O2
23.10
23 2l
23.01
21.20
23.06
23.38
23.tt
23.25
23.28
pulfierpe Emissions Calculations
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source REFCHP - Turbine Only
Project No. AST-202 4-4550
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Averase
Date lll20l24 lll20/24 lll20/24
Start Time 15:05 15:32 15:59
Stop Time 15:24 15:51 16:18
Calculated Data - Outlet
0z Concentration, % dry co, 17.84 t7.92 17.97 17.91
COr Concentration, % dry cco, t.7 t I .90 1.83 I .79
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 %o Oz
Cuo*
CNoxcts
5.05
10.00
4.77
9.60
5.40
10.39
5.07
r0.00
AliarpE)Runl-RMData
Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan UTLocation:
Source:
Project No.:
REFCHP - Turbine Only
AST-2024-4s50
Date: I ll20l24
Time
Unit
Status
Uncorrected Run Average (Cou,)
Cal Gas Concentration (Cp6)
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Average Zero Response (Co)
Pretest System Cal Response
Posttest System Cal Response
Average Cal Response (Cru)
Corrected Run A
Oz - Outlet COz - Outlet NOx - Outlet
oh dry oh dry ppmvd
Valid Valid Valid
5.42
15.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
14.95
15.t7
15.06
5.40
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.0 r
9.94
9.98
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
r0.02
10.06
10.04
l5:05
l5:06
l5:07
I 5:08
l5:09
l5: l0
15:l I
l5:12
l 5:13
l5:14
l5:15
l 5:16
l5:17
l5: l8
l5: l9
l5:20
l5:21
l5:22
l5:23
l5:24
17.82
17.86
17.86
17.84
\7.82
17.82
17.80
r 7.81
17.79
17.79
t7.78
17.79
17.76
t7.76
17.75
17.76
17.77
17.76
17.77
17.75
1.70
1.68
1.68
1.69
1.70
1.69
1.70
t.69
t.70
t.70
t.7t
t .71
1.72
1.72
1.73
t.73
1.73
t.7s
1.75
1.76
s.66
5.50
s.3 8
5.3 8
5.41
5.41
5.48
5.42
5.45
5.41
5.43
5.41
s.42
5.41
5.41
5.40
5.31
5.3 s
5.35
5.35
Run2-RMDataAliarrce
Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UTLocation:
Source:
Project No.:
REFCHP - Turbine Only
AST-2024-45s0
Date: I ll20l24
Time
Unit
Status
Or - Outlet
Yo dry
Valid
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.94
9.89
9.92
17.92
COz - Outlet
o/o dry
Valid
1.83
10.00
0.00
0.09
0.05
10.06
9.94
10.00
1.80
NOx - Outlet
ppmvd
Valid
5.09
15.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.17
15.06
15.t2
5.05
Uncorrected Run Average (Cou,)
Cal Gas Concentration (Cyn)
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Average Zero Response (Co)
Pretest System Cal Response
Posttest System Cal Response
Average Cal Response (Crr4)
Corrected Run A
l5:32
l5:33
l5:34
l5:35
I 5:36
l5:37
l5:38
I 5:39
l5:40
l5:41
l5:42
l5:43
l5:44
l5:45
l5:46
l5:47
I 5:48
l5:49
l5:50
l5:51
17.69
17.73
t7.78
17.77
17.77
17.77
t7.77
17.76
t7.76
17.75
17.77
17.76
17.75
17.74
r7.78
17.78
17.79
17.79
t 7.81
17.83
1.80
l.8l
1.79
l.80
1.81
l.8 t
t.82
t.82
1.83
1.84
1.83
1.85
1.86
1.87
1.85
1.86
1.86
1.86
1.85
1.85
5.58
5.22
5.13
5.1 I
5. l0
5.05
5.08
5.05
5.0 I
5.03
5.05
5.08
5.1 I
5.1 I
5.07
s.03
5.02
s.0 I
5.0 l
4.98
Run3-RMDataAIialpe
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
REFCHP - Turbine Only
AST-2024-4550
Date: I l/20124
Time
Unit
Status
Or - Outlet
o/o dry
Valid
COz - Outlet
oh dry
Valid
NOx - Outlet
ppmvd
Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cour)
Cal Gas Concentration (Cr*rJ
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Average Zero Response (Co)
Pretest System Cal Response
Posttest System Cal Response
Average Cal Response (Cn)
t 7.81
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.89
9.93
9.9t
17.97
1.92
r0.00
0.09
0.14
0.12
9.94
10.07
10.01
l.83
4.80
15.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
r 5.06
15. l5
t5.l l
4.77Corrected Run A
l5:59
l6:00
l6:01
l6:02
l6:03
l6:04
l6:05
l6:06
l6:07
l6:08
l6:09
l6: l0
l6:ll
l6:12
l6:13
l6: l4
l6: l5
l6:16
l6:17
l6: l8
17.78
17.80
17.81
17.81
17.85
17,82
17.80
17.81
17.82
17.81
17.81
17.80
17.78
17.81
17.80
17.81
17.80
17.81
17.82
17.83
1.89
1.90
L90
1.90
1.88
1.90
I .91
l.9l
I .91
1.92
1.93
1.94
1.95
1.94
1.94
1.94
1.95
1.95
1.95
1.94
5.03
4.91
4.91
4.88
4.80
4.81
4.80
4.81
4.81
4.76
4.81
4.77
4.81
4.74
4.77
4.78
4.71
4.71
4.68
4.71
Emissions Calculations,AIiatpe Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source REFCHP - Duct Burner Only
Project No. AST-2024-4550
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Average
Date
Start Time
Stoo Time
n/2u24
9:01
l0:00
nl2y24 1v2U24
10:13 ll:24
ll:12 12:23
Source Data
Fuel Heating Value, Btu/scf
Fuel Factor (O2 dry), dscf/\,lMBtu
Fuel Rate, Kscfh
FHv
Fd
FR
1,040
8,710
44.20
1,040
8,710
45.26
1,040
8,710
44.77
1,040
8,710
45
Input Data - Outlet
Volumetric Flow Rate (Ml9), dscfm Qs 40,262 41,775 42,620 41,536
Calculated Data - Outlet
Dz Concentration, % dry co, t7.44 17.48 t7.59 17.50
COz Concentration, o/o dry Cco, 1.93 t.97 1.90 t.93
CO Concentration, ppmvd
CO Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 % 02
CO Emission Rate, lb/hr
Cco
Cco",s
ERco
13.23
22.54
2.3
13.18
22.75
2.4
10.88
19.36
2.0
12.43
2t.55
2.3
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 % O,
NOx Emission Rate. lb/hr
Clo*
CNoxc t 5
ER*.r'
22.07
37.58
6.4
18.56
32.03
5.6
18.75
33.3 8
5.7
t9.79
34.33
5.9
A/lr€rlEe Runl-RMData
Locetion: Rio Tinto Kcmecott - South Jordm, UT
Sour"c,
Projmt No.: .AST-2024-4550
Timr
Unit
Or - Outlet COr - Outlct
o/. dr! o/c drXValid Valid
CO - Outlct
ppmvd
Valid
NOr - Outlct
ppmvd
Valid
Utrcorrcacd Ru Avcregc (C6)
Cd Gas Conccntrgtion (Cu)
Prctgt Sy3tcm Zcro Raporoc
Posttcst SWtcE Z.ro Rcsponse
Avcrrgc Zcro Reponrc (Co)
PretBt Systcm Cel Raponsc
Posttdt Sy3teE Cd Rapome
Avcrrge Cel Raponsc (Cy)
t7.40 L9410.00 10.000.00 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.009.94 10.0510.02 9.989.98 10.0217.44 1.93
t3.27
15.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.09
15.00
15.05
13.23
15.00
0.00
0,2 r
0.1 I
15.04
15.00
15.02
22.07
9:01
9:02
9:03
9:04
9:05
9:06
9.01
9:08
9:09
9:10
9:l I
9:12
9;13
9:14
9:15
9:16
9:17
9:lt
9: t9
9:20
9:21
9.22
9:23
9:24
9.25
9.26
9:27
9:2E
9:29
9:30
9:31
9:32
9:33
9:34
9:35
9:36
9:37
9:38
9:39
9:40
9:41
9..42
9:43
9:44
9:45
9:46
9:41
9:48
9:49
9:50
9:51
9.52
9:53
9:54
9:55
9:56
9:57
9:58
9:59
l0:00
t7 .40
t7 .4s
t7 .39
L1 .49
t7 .45
t7 .45
I't.42
t7 .45
t7 .49
t7 .42
t't .43
17.36
t7 .45 .
t7.5t
t7.43
t7.42
t7.3',7
17.39
t7 .4t
t7.39
t7.39
17.38
t1 .4t
t7 .41
t1 .44
t7 .42
t1 .39
t'l.39
t1 .36
t7.44
t7.39
t7.36
t7.36
17.42
11.34
t1.40
r7.38
17.39
t1.42
t't .47
17.38
t7 .34
t't.33
17.38
17.40
t1.39
t'l.34
17.36
t7.4t
t7.34
17.35
17.43
17.40
t7 .41
t7 .34
t1.41
17.38
t7.39
17.38
17.38
1.94
t.9 r
1.95
L88
l.9l
t.9l
t.92
l.9l
1.88
1.92
L92
1.95
l.9l
L88
L92
L93
1.95
L94
t.92
1.93
1.93
1.94
1.93
1.93
1.92
1.92
L94
t.94
1.95
l.9l
1.93
1.95
L95
1.93
t.97
1.93
r.95
1.94
r.93
t.90
1.95
1.97
1.98
L94
t.94
L95
t.97
t.96
t.94
l.97
t.97
t.93
1.94
1.93
1.96
1.93
L95
1.95
L95
t.95
t3.62
13.5
14. l6
t3.33
13.23
t2.36
13.23
13.25
13.58
13.39
I1.94
13.48
r4. l0
13.53
12,79
t2.35
r3.18
t3.19
I1.95
12.45
12.48
t2.43
13.18
12.64
t3.23
r 2.83
t3.27
t}.27
t3.74
13.33
13.02
14.50
14.24
I 3.59
13.45
t2.34
13.87
t3.11
12.97
12.66
t4.t6
13.48
13.96
t3.24
13.49
13.83
13.49
t2.8J
12.80
t2.78
I 3.54
14.39
13.65
13.41
t2.95
t4.44
13.02
12.t9
t3.77
t3.45
22.0t
2t.84
22.t9
2t.40
2t.96
2t.49
21.60
2t,64
2t.4t
2l.48
22.42
22.26
2t.90
2t.30
2t.89
22.06
22.48
22.3t
22.31
22.t4
2t.96
22.52
21.97
22.3r
21.47
21.60
21.84
2t.9t
22.0',1
21.10
2t.96
2t.93
22.06
2t.77
22.04
22.50
22.10
22.00
2t.86
21.83
2t.93
2t.92
22.19
22.42
22.44
22.03
22.40
22.t1
22.06
22.47
22.76
2l.97
22.34
22.29
22.87
2t.13
22.3s
22.28
22.t8
22.52
lt.IATEE Run2-RMDataAI
lncrtion: fuo Tinto Kcmecou - South Jordm. UT
Source: REFCHP - Duct Bmer Only
Project No.: AST-2024-4550
Dtact lll2l/24
Time
Unit
Or - Outlet CO, - OutlctYodrt YndrlValid Valid
CO - Outlct
ppmvd
Valid
NOr - Outlet
ppmvd
Valid
Uncorrcctcd Rur Avcregc (C.y)
Crl Ges Conccntrrtion (Cm)
Pr.tcst Syst.m Zcro Reponsc
Posttest SystcE Zaro Responsc
Avcrrgc Zcro Rcponr (Co)
Prctcst Systcm Cal Reponsc
Posttst SFtcm Cel Rcponsc
Avcrege Cd Rapousc (Cy)
t7.48
10.00
0.00
0.0 r
0.01
10.02
9.98
10.00
t7 48
1.98
10.00
0.00
0.07
0.04
9.98
9.88
9.93
t97
13. t9
I 5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.00
15.02
15.01
13. l8
t8.5 I
15.00
0.21
0.00
0.1 I
I 5.00
t4.96
14.98
I 8.56
l0: l3
l0: l4
l0: l5
l0: l6
l0: t7
l0: l8
l0: l9
l0:20
l0:21
l0:22
l0:23
t0.24
l0:25
l0:26
l0:27
l0:28
t0.29
l0:30
l0:31
l0:32
l0:33
l0:34
l0:35
l0:36
t0:37
l0:38
l0:39
l0:40
l0:41
l0:42
l0:43
l0:44
l0:45
l0:46
l0:4'l
l0:48
l0:49
l0;50
l0:5 t
l0:52
l0:53
l0:54
l0:55
l0:56
l0:57
l0:58
l0:59
I l:00
ll:01
I l:02
I l:03
I l:04
I l:05
t t:06
I l:07
I l:08
I l:09
ll:10ll:ll
ll:12
17.48
t7.48
t7.4'7
17.39
17.44
17.48
t7.49
t7.49
t1.39
t't.42
t1.45
17.48
17.48
t't.50
11.46
t1 .46
17.40
t7.46
t7:4s
t1 .49
t't .41
17.38
t7.49
17.38
t7.46
17.48
t7.4E
t7.44
17.43
17.4'l
t7.44
t7.49
11.49
t7.57
t7.42
t't.53
17.49
t1.48
t't.49
17.50
I 7.58
t7.51
t7.52
t7 .48
t 7.58
t1.53
t't .46
t1 .49
17.51
t'l,49
t1.52
t'l.52
t7.53
t7.48
t7.48
t't.46
17.49
17.53
17.49
t7.50
1.98
1.99
2.00
2.04
2.00
1.98
1.98
1.99
2.05
2.03
2.0t
2.00
1.99
1.98
2.0t
2.00
2.03
r.99
L98
1.98
2.01
2.04
t.98
2.03
1.99
1.97
L97
1.99
2.00
L9E
2.00
1.98
t.97
L93
2.0t
12.1s
t2.40
I1.65
12.04
12.88
13.45
12.42
13.0 t
t3.33
13.84
13.39
14. l5
t4.27
13.68
ll.4 I
13.98
13.78
13.83
13.1 8
13.33
13.94
r3.50
t4.52
14.36
13.77
14.27
13.66
t4.47
I 3.83
13.40
13.78
t2.35
13.39
13.63
I 3.87
14.05
13.48
13.38
13.22
12.38
13. l2
12.91
12.30
I 1.65
t2.46
12.98
12.t0
t2.28
t2.56
t2.55
I 1.36
I1.79
t3.72
t2.90
12.59
12.54
t3.37
13.28
t3.24
13. t4
18.74
18.90
19.43
19.39
19.38
18.87
18.98
r9.02
19.43
t9.s2
18.73
t9.22
18.55
18.82
t9.23
19.08
19.00
19.38
19.16
I 8.87
I9.40
19.69
t9. l4
t9.25
18.7 t
18. t3
18. l3
18.49
18.73
I E.64
18.59
t7.97
18.09
t7.82
18.42
17.90
1E.40
17.94
1E.24
17.81
t7.56
t7.E7
18.13
18.31
t7.77
17.38
18.13
18.46
t7.91
17.80
t7.91
18.00
17.55
18. l4
t7.85
17.89
r8.2t
18.08
18.35
17.85
95
97
98
97
96
92
96
96
99
93
1.96
1.99
1.98
|.91
98
96
96
95
t.98
1.98
L99
1.97
1.95
t.97
1.97
F,rarEe Run3-RMData
AT
lcrtion: fuo Tinto Kcmccott - South
Sourcc: REFCHP - Duct
Project No.: AST-20244550
Dttc: lll2ll24
Timc
Unit
Strtu!
0r - Oudct COr - Outlct
"hdry ohdrt
Valid Valid
CO- Outl.t
ppmvd
Valid
NOr - Outlct
ppmvd
Valid
Uncorretcd Run Avcregc (C"6)t7.53
t0.00
0.0 t
0.02
0.02
9.98
9.91
9.9t
17.59
1.95
10.00
0.07
0.08
0.08
9.E8
9.99
9.94
1.90
10.E9
15.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.02
15.02
15.02
10.88
1E.80
15.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
t4.96
t5.ll
I 5.04
18.75
Cel Grs Cooccntretion (C6)
Prctgt System Zcro Rcponsc
Poltt6i Systcm Z.ro Rcspouc
Avcrege Zcro Reponsc (Co)
Pretet Systcm Cll Respoo.rc
PoJttBt Systcm C.l RBpoBe
Avengc Cd Rcrpouc (Cy)
Corrcctcd Run
ll:24
I l:25
I l:26
ll:27
I l:28
I l:29
I l:30
ll:31
I l:32
I l:33
I t:34
I l:35
I l:36
I l:37
I l:38
I l:39
I l:40
I l:41
ll:42
I l:43
ll:44
I l:45
I l:46
n.47
I l:48
I l:49
I l:50
ll:51
I l:52
I l:53
I l:54
I l:55
I t:56
ll:57
I l:58
I l:59
l2:00
l2:01
12:02
l2:03
l2:04
l2:05
l2:06
l2:07
l2:0E
l2:09
l2: l0
l2:ll
12:12
12:13
12:14
l2: l5
l2: l6
12:17
l2: l8
12:19
12:20
l2:21
12:22
12:23
t'7 .46
t1 .43
17.50
l7 .s3
l?.48
t7.52
t7.53
t'?.57
t1.56
t1 .51
17.49
17.53
I 7.56
t7.55
t'l.52
17.54
t7.51
t7.s6
t7.63
t7.59
17.58
t7.54
t7.56
t7.55
t7.51
17.52
t7.56
t7.54
t7.57
11.55
I't.54
t7.57
t'1.55
t'l.60
t7 .55
17.60
t7.56
t7 .55
17.58
t't .5't
t7.53
t7.55
t7.52
t7.45
17.48
I 7.50
17.53
t7.57
17.50
17.49
17.50
l?.48
t1.46
t1.49
t7.45
t't.48
17.53
t'l.45
17.48
t7 .47
2.00
2.02
r.98
1.97
2.00
1.98
1.98
1.96
1.96
1.96
t.99
r.98
1.96
1.95
L.97
t.96
|.94
1.94
1.90
!.92
1.93
t.95
1.94
L95
1,94
L96
1.92
1.93
l.9l
1.93
1.94
1.93
t.94
t.92
t.94
l.9l
1.93
1.94
t.92
1.93
1.95
1.93
r.94
1.98
1.96
t.94
t.92
1.90
L93
1.94
1.94
1.95
1.96
I 1.86
13.09
t2.t7
t2.2t
I 1.84
t1.62
I1.98
11.47
I 1.39
n.67
I l.l5
10.45
10.42
l0.ll
I l.l8
10.36
10.07
10.61
10.01
10. l7
10.1 8
10.52
10.99
10.44
10.43
t0.92
9.79
10.35
10.85
10. l4
9.60
10.30
r0.93
10.33
10.57
10.51
10.82
10.69
10.92
9.9E
I 1.56
I 1.04il.ll
I l.14
9.t9
10.79
10.39
10.36
10.E9
1 1.30
10.95
I 1.44
10.E5
10.87
1 1.43
r 1.32
I 1.33
12.08
u.l2
10.49
18.86
18.75
18.73
18.48
I 8.52
t8.74
18.68
18.66
18.?l
18.53
18.78
t9.25
18.99
19.03
I 8.87
19.06
t 8.61
18.86
tE.47
18.40
I 8.84
18.84
18.,r4
1E.86
18.89
19.05
18.66
18.78
18.33
18.74
t8.72
18.59
I 8.88
18.68
18.73
18.28
18.57
I 8.82
I 8.52
I 8.E7
r8.56
18.48
t 8.57
t9. t7
19. t5
19.24
I 8.86
I 8.50
18.63
19,05
19.00
19.23
19.40
19.1 0
1 9.14
t9.23
18.64
18.76
t9.01
19.04
94
96
95
92
96
t.94
1.95
AliarpE)
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No. AST-2024-4550
Parameter Or - Outlel COz - Outlel CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Ooeratins Ranse
CAI
700
2312020
25
CAI
700
2312020
25
Thermo
48i
42CHL-59778-324
100
Thermo
42C
l2cHL-59778-324
100
Cylinder ID
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
cc723454
E'80072206
NA
NA
cc723454
E80072206
NA
NA
E80085254
EB0085254
NA
NA
EB00l 1606
EB00 I I 606
Cylinder Certified Values
Zero
Mid
Hish
NA
10.99
24.03
NA
23.9
24.03
NA
503
503
NA
501
s0l
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero
Mid
Hish
NA
9119t31
4^t32
NA
9lt9l31
4nt32
NA
7127/29
7 t27 t29
NA
9lt613t
9lt613t
Iype of Sample Line Heated le Line
pulfi;rpe
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Response Times
REFCHP - Combined Cycle
AST-2024-4550
seconds
Parameter Or - Outlel COr - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Zero
Low
Mid
Hieh
60
NA
60
60
NA
60
60
NA
60
60
NA
60
Average 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0
Aliarpe Calibration Data
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source: REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No.: AST-2024-4550
Date: I ll20l24
Parameter Or - Outlet COz - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Exoected Average Concentration r 2.00 5.00 15.00 15.00
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Snan
12.00
60.00
24.03
5.00
25.00
23.90
15.00
75.00
30.00
15.00
75.00
30.00
Low Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
9.61
t4.42
9.56
14.34
12.00
18.00
12.00
18.00
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (% or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
10.00
24.03
0.00
NA
10.00
23.90
0.00
NA
15.00
30.00
0.00
NA
15.00
30.00
Upscale Calibration Gas (Cy4)Mid Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
10.00
24.03
0.00
NA
10.00
23.93
0.00
NA
I s.16
30.01
0.00
NA
15.07
29.99
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
0.00
0.00
0.00
NA
0.00
0. l3
0.00
NA
0.53
0.03
0.00
NA
0.23
0.03
Zero
Low
Mid
Hieh
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
AIialEe Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No.: AST-2024-4550
Parameter O: - Outlet CO, - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run I Date ll/20124
Span Value
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posftest Svstem Upscale ResDonse
24.03
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
10.08
10.05
23.90
0.00
10.00
0. l6
0.00
10. l0
10.03
30.00
0.00
15.16
0.20
0.00
15. l5
15.07
30.00
0.00
15.07
0. l0
0.00
15.08
15.01
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posftest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.00
0.00
0.33
0.21
0.67
0.00
0.42
0. l3
0.67
0.00
-0.03
-0.30
0.33
0.00
0.03
-0.20
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
-0.r2
-0.67
-0.29
-0.67
-0.27
-0.33
-0.23
Run 2 Date lll20l24
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale Response
24.03
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
10.05
10.04
23.90
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
10.03
10.06
30.00
0.00
15.16
0.00
0.00
15.07
15.12
30.00
0.00
t 5.07
0.00
0.00
15.01
15. l3
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posftest Span
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.t3
0.25
0.00
0.00
-0.30
-0. l3
0.00
0.00
-0.20
0.20
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
-0.04
0.00
0. l3
0.00
0.17
0.00
0.40
Run 3 Date lll20l24
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Response
24.03
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
10.04
10.01
23.90
0.00
r 0.00
0.00
0.00
r 0.06
10.02
30.00
0.00
1 5.16
0.00
0.00
t5.12
I 5.02
30.00
0.00
15.07
0.00
0.00
t 5.13
14.95
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.00
0.00
0.t7
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.08
0.00
0.00
-0. l3
-0.47
0.00
0.00
0.20
-0.40
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
-0. l2
0.00
-0.17
0.00
-0.33
0.00
-0.60
AIlarpE)QA Data
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source REFCHP - Turbine Only
Project Xo. 4
Parameter Or - Outlet COr - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Oneratins Range
CAI
700
2312020
25
CAI
700
2312020
25
Thermo
42C
42CHL-59778-32t
100
Cylinder ID
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
cc723454
E,80072206
NA
NA
cc723454
EB,0072206
NA
NA
EB00l 1606
E8001 1606
Cylinder Certifi ed Values
Zero
Mid
Hish
NA
10.99
24.03
NA
23.9
24.03
NA
50t
501
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero
Mid
Hish
NA
9lt913t
4nt32
NA
9lt913t
41v32
NA
9n6t3l
9n613t
Ivne of Samole Line Heated Sample Line
A/lArEe
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: REFCHP - Turbine Only
Project No.: AST-2024-4550
Response Times
Times, seconds
Parameter Oz - Outlet CO, - Outlet NOx - Outlet
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hioh
60
NA
60
60
NA
60
60
NA
60
Averaqe 60.0 60.0 60.0
AIiarpe Calibration Data
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source: REFCHP - Turbine Only
Project No.: AST-2024-4550
Date: I ll20l24
Parameter O: - Outlet COr - Outlet NOx- Outlet
Exoected Averase Concentration 12.00 5.00 15.00
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Soan
12.00
60.00
24.03
5.00
2s.00
23.90
15.00
75.00
30.00
Low Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
9.61
14.42
9.56
14.34
12.00
18.00
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
10.00
24.03
0.00
NA
10.00
23.90
0.00
NA
15.00
30.00
Upscale Calibration Gas (C*n)Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
10.00
24.03
0.00
NA
10.00
23.93
0.00
NA
15.07
29.99
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
0.00
0.00
0.00
NA
0.00
0.13
0.00
NA
0.23
0.03
Status
Zero
Low
Mid
Hieh
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
AIlarpE)Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source: REFCHP - Turbine Only
Project No.: AST-2024-4550
Parameter Or - Outlet COr - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run I Date lll20n4
Span Value
lnitial Instrument Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale Response
24.03
0.00
r 0.00
0.00
0.00
r0.0r
9.94
23.90
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
10.02
10.06
30.00
0.00
15.07
0.00
0.00
14.95
15.17
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.00
0.00
0.04
-0.25
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.25
0.00
0.00
-0.40
0.33
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
-0.29
0.00
0.17
0.00
0.73
Run 2 Date lll20n4
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale CaI Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
24.03
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
9.94
9.89
23.90
0.00
t0.00
0.00
0.09
10.06
9.94
30.00
0.00
15.07
0.00
0.00
15.17
t 5.06
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.00
0.00
-0.2s
-0.46
0.00
0.3 8
0.25
-0.25
0.00
0.00
0.33
-0.03
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
-0.21
0.3 8
-0.50
0.00
-0.37
Run 3 Date lll20l24
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale Response
24.03
0.00
t 0.00
0.00
0.00
9.89
9.93
23.90
0.00
10.00
0.09
0. l4
9.94
10.07
30.00
0.00
15.07
0.00
0.00
15.06
15.15
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posftest Soan
0.00
0.00
-0.46
-0.29
0.38
0.59
-0.25
0.29
0.00
0.00
-0.03
0.27
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
0. l7
0.21
0.54
0.00
0.30
AlialrcE)QA Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan UT
REFCHP - Duct Burner Only
AST-2024-4550
Thermo
48i
42CHL-59778-
100
Thermo
42C
2CHL-,9778-324
100
Zero
Low
Mid
Certified Values
Zero
Mid
der Expiration Date
Zero
Mid
NA
9t19t3t
4n132
NA
9n9t3l
4lt/32
NA
7127 /29
7127t29
NA
9ll613t
9tr6t3l
,AliatpE)Response Times
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
REFCHP - Duct Burner Only
AST-2024-4s50
60
NA
::
60
NA
::
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
60
NA
::
60
NA
::
Aliatpe Calibration Data
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: REFCHP - Duct Burner Only
Project No.: AST-2024-4550
Date: I ll2ll24
Parameter Oz - Outlet COz - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Exoected Averase Concentration 17.00 s.00 15.00 15.00
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Soan
17.00
85.00
24.03
5.00
25.00
23.90
15.00
7s.00
30.00
15.00
75.00
30.00
Low Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
9.61
14.42
9.56
14.34
12.00
r 8.00
12.00
18.00
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (o/, or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
10.00
24.03
0.00
NA
10.00
23.90
0.00
NA
15.00
30.00
0.00
NA
15.00
30.00
Upscale Calibration Gas (Crua)Mid Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
9.94
24.03
0.00
NA
10.00
23.93
0.00
NA
15.02
30.05
0.00
NA
15.31
29.99
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
0.25
0.00
0.00
NA
0.00
0.13
0.00
NA
0.07
0.r7
0.00
NA
1.03
0.03
Status
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
Aliatpe Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: REFCHP - Duct Burner Only
Project No.: AST-2024-4550
Parameter 0r - Outlet COz - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run I Date lll2ll24
Span Value
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response
Initial lnstrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
24.03
0.00
9.94
0.00
0.00
9.94
10.02
23.90
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
10.05
9.98
30.00
0.00
r 5.02
0.00
0.00
1 5.09
15.00
30.00
0.00
t 5.31
0.00
0.21
15.04
15.00
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest SDan
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.21
-0.08
0.00
0.00
0.23
-0.07
0.00
0.70
-0.90
-1.03
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
0.33
0.00
-0.29
0.00
-0.30
0.70
-0. l3
Run 2 Date lll2ll24
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
lnstrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
24.03
0.00
9.94
0.00
0.01
10.02
9.98
23.90
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.07
9.98
9.88
30.00
0.00
15.02
0.00
0.00
l5,00
l5.02
30.00
0.00
r5.3r
0.21
0.00
t 5.00
14.96
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.00
0.04
0.33
0.17
0.00
0.29
-0.08
-0.50
0.00
0.00
-0.07
0.00
0.70
0.00
-t.03
-1.17
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.04
-0.17
0.29
-0.42
0.00
0.07
-0.70
-0.13
Run 3 Date lll2ll24
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale Response
24.03
0.00
9.94
0.01
0.02
9.98
9.97
23.90
0.00
10.00
0.07
0.08
9.88
9.99
30.00
0.00
15.02
0.00
0.00
15.02
t5.02
30.00
0.00
15.31
0.00
0.00
14.96
l5.ll
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Soan
0.04
0.08
0. l7
0.12
0.29
0.3 3
-0.50
-0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-1.17
-0.67
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.04
-0.04
0.04
0.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
PJIIMbdUla
Accreditatlon ,162754
Red Ball Technica! Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 7'l'|.07
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lO # G12024
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
=_8OO72206
127907
900 PsrG
-8OO72206.20240320-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certifl cation Dates:
)4103t2024
04t0112032
=8OO12206.20240320184214366
standard has been certifled per the May 201 2 EPA -12t531,
ino orocedure G2
Concentration Uncortalnty Analytlcal Prlnclple As8ayed On
x0j Yo
10.06 %
20.01 %
24 76 0/"
1 162980025 03|1ADO24
017146467 04t02n924
SMART.CERT
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement paramelers to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otheruse noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, withoul written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
fu)ql^""
Brlttany Johnson
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J R€vised on 2018-09-'17
treri
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD # G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
4c723454
12537',l
1900 PS|G
4c723454.20230907-O
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
)9t21t2023
)9/1 9/2031
-shrevenon-la
ic723454.20230907
198494251
calibration standard has been certified per the May 201 .12t531,
Gl,
concentratlon Uncortalnty Analytical Pdnciple Assayed On
10.9 o/o
10.99 %
fr.1l%
tO.02Yo
cc737012.20230228
EBOO22021 201A0323
1 162980025 09t188O23
017146467 09t21DO23
SMART-CERT
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncerlainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% contidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken rnto account
when determining pass or fail.
'f *- /.k*,
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Voreion 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17
EdFi &-,JJ!f**Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551-8150
PGVP Vendor lD # G1202'l
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylindor Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
E80085254
124234
'1900 PS|G
E80085254.2021 07 2't -0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certificatlon Dates:
)7129t2021
)7t27t2029
shrEveoon - I A
=80045254.20210721183082283
This calibration standard has been certifled per the -'12t531,
procedure G1.
Certified Concentration(s)
rbon Monoxide
Concentratlon
503 PPtut
Uncertalnty
+3 PPTJI
Analytical Prlnclple
GCF
Alsayed On
07n9no21
Balance
Analytical Measurement Oata Available Onllne.
cc209344 20180315
cc734571.20200508
'I t708001 07t1212021
SMART.CERT
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated^ested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a companson of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 950/0 confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 201 8-0$'l 7
Amisha Jewltt
EE^&*PJ!l*..
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Cralg Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD * G12O23
EPA PROTOGOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
:8001 1606
124235
t900 PS|G
:8001 1606.20230906-0
Certificatlon Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracklng Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
)9t14t2023
)911612031
.shrevenon-lA
:800'l 1 606.20230906
)25274839
This calibration standard has been certified per the May 201
procedure G1.
Concentratlon Unccrtalnty Analytlcal Prlnclplo Assayed On
'otal Oxides of Nitrogen 503 PPM
Reference Standard(s)
41-M-50
E80059947.202301 1 7
sx3269'1.202301 1 7
996.7 PPM
280 PPM
279,8 PPM
sRM 1687b
sRM 1687b
sRM 1687b
1152610017 08n9n023
SMART-CERT
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otheMise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
,/att* lh"r/L
Aaron Varelas
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Ravis€d on 2018-09-17
AllalpE)
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source:
Project No.:
Date I
Analyzer Make:
Analyzer Model:
Analyzer SN:
Enrironics ID:
Component/Balance Gas:
Cylinder Gas ID (Dilution):
Cylinder Gas Concentration (Dilution). o,i,:
CAI
23 TZOZO
945'7
()2/N2
E80072206
24.O3
Cylmder Gas ID (Mid-kvel) CC723454
Cylinder Gas Concentration (Mid-Level), 7o t0.99
For these mits the 90o/o (D Tlpm md 800" @ Tlpm injections will not be conducted
Vlethod Critena FPA
Prrsmetel 02
Ntaxe
Model
S/N
'700
2112020
24.03
lvlinder Number lD
Zero
Mid
Hish
NA
cc723454
EB0072206
:lvlinder Certilied Values
Lero
Mid
Hiqh
0.0
10.99
24 03
Inslrument ResDonse (7o or DDm)
Leto
Mid
Hioh
0.0
I 1.0
240
:allDrlnon (,AS SelSnOn l-lo Ol SDtnl
Mid
Hish
45.7
100.0
l"rlihretion Error Performsnce 17" of Snanl
IATO
Mid
lfioh
U,U
0.0
0.0
Linearitv (7" of Ranse)
0.0
Target Mrss Flow
Contollers
T.rget
Dilution
to/^r
Target Flow
Rate
lnm
Target
(loncentration
Actual
Concentration
I o/^\
Analyzer
Concentration
t o/^\
Analyzer
Concentrstion
to/^\
Analyzer
Concentration
lo/^\
AvEr.tsE
Anelyzer
Concentration
lo/^l
Difference Average Error
I + 2./.\
OI,/5I,800 5.0 19.2 .U 19. I 19.16 t9.I 19. I -0.05 -o.3"h
OL/5L 50.0 5o 12 0 00 1l 96 il99 tt 91 ll97 -0 03 -0 20/"
OL/IL 20.0 4.0 tao 4 '14 4 l{(l 4tl3 -o 02 -U \e/6
ot./lL 100 4.0 4 40 z.5d l.5tJ t.5a z.-0.03
Analyzer
Concenlration
to/.r
lnjection I
Error
(*27.1
Injection 2
E rror(r2a.l
Injection 3
Error
( *.2 a.\
l9 t5 0 00/"0 loa -0 tv"
I.91 -O.lYo V. l'/o o.o"
478 -0.8%0.5vr 0.30/o
O.6Yo -o.3"h -() au/h
Aliarrcef,oUnaE rts,lrtJcl
Mass Flow Controller Calibration
Note: Themassflowcontroller'scalibrationvaluesareusedbythedilutionsystem'soperatingsoftwaretoimproveaccuracy. Thesecalibrationsarenot
necessarilyindicativeofthesystemsoverallperformance. PerformanceisverifiedbyconductingaMethod205priortoeachfielduse.
Calibration Performed By TCH
Dilution System Make:
Dllutlon System Model:
Dilution System S/N:
Calibration Equipment Make:
Calibration Equipment Model:
Calibration Equipment S/N:
Flow Cell S/N:
Flow Cell S/N:
Calibration Gas:
Barometric Pressure, mmHg:
Ambient Temperature,'F:
Environics
4040
Alicat Scientific
M-10SLPD/sMM-O/sM, M-15LPM-D/s
272t2t/272t20
272t21
272L20
Nitrogen
25.48
73.5
Mass Flow Controller lD
Size, ccm:
Make:
Model:
S/N:
#1
10,000
HastinSs
EFC202
13393s2003
#2
10,000
Hastings
EFC202
1339352007
#3
1,000
Hastings
EFC202
1339354003
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cc/min cc/min
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cc/min cc/min
Set Flow True Flow Dlfference
cc/min cc/min
5%
t0%
20%
30%
40%
so%
60%
70%
80%
90%
L00%
500 5L2 2.4%
1,000 L,o34 3.4%
2,000 2,085 4.3%
3,000 3,114 3.8%
4,000 4,t23 3.L%
5,000 5,130 2.6%
6,000 6,146 2.4%
7,000 7,169 2.4%
8,000 8,175 2.2%
9,000 9,205 23%
10,000 to,244 2.4%
500 507 L.4%
1,000 L,024 2.4%
2,000 2,056 2.8%
3,000 3,075 2.5%
4,000 4,084 2.t%
5,000 5,088 L.8/o
6,000 6,088 t.s%
7,000 7,to5 L.5%
8,000 8,t37 L.7%
9,000 9,L82 2.O%
10,000 L0,264 2.6%
50 49.8 0.4%
100 101.2 L.2%
200 203.8 L.9%
300 306.9 2.3%
400 409.8 2.5%
500 512.3 2s%
600 6L4.2 2.4%
700 7L6.9 2.4%
800 819.1 2.4/o
900 92r.2 2.4%
1,000 L.o22.3 2.2%
Date 9125/24
Aliarpe
Location:
Project No.:
Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
AST-2024-45s0
NOr Converter Check - Outlet+Analyzer Model ffiCylinder ID Number +Cylinder Concentration, ppm
Pre-Test Date lll20/24 Time 9:35
Pre-Test Concentration, ppm 49.56
Pre-Test Efficiency, 7o 99
Post-Test Date l1l2ll24 Time 12:45
Post-Test Con."rlE'ii6ffiir 47)
Post-Test Efficiency, 7o %
)D is >- 90 o%.
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, A 71'107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD #G'i.2022
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cyllnder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
EB0't 02195
124731
1900 PSIG
=BO
1 02',t 95.20220 1',t 2-t)
Certification Date:
Erpiratlon Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracklng Number:
Prevlous Certlfl cation Dates:
)1129t2022
J',v2il2025
=80102195.20220112)95 tO64 I 4
is calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 -'12t531,
G1.
-t
Analytlcal Measurement Data Avallable onllne.
Reference Standard(s)
SMART.CERT
This is to certiry the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verifled to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales thal are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to lhe lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
,/ndn thrr/L
Aaron Varelas
Analytlcal Chemlst
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Rovised on 2018-09-'17
Certifi ed Concentration(s)
Concontration Uncertalnty Analytical Prlnclple A$ayod On
un\2022,01t28t2022Dioxide49.5 PPM tO.6 PPM FTIR
Balance
E80085260 E80085260.20190102 02D6n024 GM|S AIR NO2 87.3 PPM 1.063 C1847810.02
MKS MKS 2031DJG2EKVS13T 017146467 01106t2022
AT r-ia-"IAlEE
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No.: AST-2024-4550
Date: I l/2012024
Traverse Point Time CO
(nom)
NOx
(onm)
A-l
2
3
I l:05
I l:07
I l:08
27.06
27.46
28,53
27.7
n.24
12.08
12.75
12,0Average
Criteria Met Single Point 3 Point
A/lfgrrpe
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: REFCHP - Duct Burner Only
Project No.: AST-2024-4550
Date: I ll2ll2024
Traverse Point Time o2
(o/ol
Coz
(o/"1
CO
(nnm)
NOx
(nnm)
A-l
2
J
7:30
7:32
7:34
17.27
17.31
17.31
17.3
1.96
1.98
t.99
2.0
16.32
17.48
16.78
t6.9
21.65
2r.05
21.64
21.4Average
Criteria lVlet Single Pornt Single Pornt Surgle Polnt Srngle Pornt
oEc.9(!coE0,,EEI(oo-
fgIxoO)E.E,=E!o!o=(!(gE!o)
.=foo.:Eoo-**
-(oEEfUIooctioColr
l
.l
iEUJo(Jc.gE-EoUCLIQ-ocoE,
E-c
tooo-
rr
l
ft'
)
^b
0EC
,E
(
E
od
,
_d
;
0)
=
q-

co
o(
U
O.
:
<f

l_
or
uf
Or
O9,
:
=)
'
(n
O
(o
o
NL
Nd+
t.
r
tZo
>6
f-
o
-
(J
(
E3u
(o
Eug
E(
EOG
,
iE
x
^i
(
!
;>
.=

,^
+;
<tEF-
sf
c\
toNo(\
ldFlIocfcoL'o!c(!oLEFoE'oOJIU'o(u.=ItEoLJ
Ic-=t
-:
1
-.

cL
io+t

0J
Ft
r
riqF{
q,cr-
.
,
|
Uo..
i
}R\tanl
\6o\
\fOlBrOJ5c5!o!U5!oa.
!Ef,s0JE5scEb\oo\
stc\ot\ot\rlFlo!ocoO)c53F
og'6ae
or
*
+r

oJ
FI
or{
oq
oq
bRvoHOrcq)Orc5EolJ5!oa!qJsoqJEEo'
\oo\
st(\oNriNr-
l
r-
.
1
OJs=
.
ae
or
I
C9+r
(
U
Ft
L
(.ooci
(.
orlci
Firici
}RNO|O)cqJOl5BsolJ5\oa.BOJ55qJLsscEobR
gLor
5
.=

o-
€E
foFF
6l
F{@<t
<fN.irn
rlqt-
{
rr
)
aOJo5
.=

o-
-O
c
L
L
:r
(
U
FF
<fo)oLA
onrnCJ
ln
Ct
r
\ooist
aIo5
.=

o.
-O
-
LLfo
J
FF
q)n6t
<l
rn.i<f
Ioq6(n
ti,
EI
(o
v
L=oc
L
CPo=
(9
0
.Y
]
lncn<l
(o
oqrnOr+(o
u'!st@+d
=.1
g.
l
(!
PL=oJ

o.
CP
(J
f
(9
o
gdiOrst
(o
\(\
lolnro
o)Norn(o
-=a
-:
Z
Ev
(ll

P
LJOO
.
CPol
(,
o
Ord
oto
tr
lo
oi
'
(E
-
c
e>
9-
o
E}
=o
Fl
!
r\\<l
'Nel
,Y
i
fi1qrrNF.{
fn
(nqrnNr{an
-C(E
-
c
(r
>
9-
o
43=o
FL
Fcr
l
(\
l
t\Fl
al
1
@rnoiNr-
{
rn
@n6l
(nr-
l
t!'
)
(E
-
c
(9
>
o!
LV+==o
F
IJ
-
lnoq(n
lnq(n
LAoqan
oL)oo-F^E
.9
f
Q)
q
fi
e
(nrno(^
o
ot-.
,
|
.i(o
oNCJ(o
ooo-A
.s
o
(U
o
de
on(n<f
<lol<tsf
r\n(nsf
.>troOcfct
!L)oOJLiIaoL
OJq0)o-F^a
.9
p
OJ
o
A
r-
1
Nc!(nLn
OlFl+sf
(nrn+<t
=o^
LLF\
.
=qU€
6,
Y
tnN.jro
coFl.i
ln
lJ
1eFl!A
3o^
LL-!F.\E1
o=6Y
NcO'l
(\rood
@LNcd
**3ot!
LF\
.
=6o=6Y
o)
oqFl
fn
<tNc.,
im
(O(nr..
,
i
CN
(Et,o-
cl
!LL
JdS
t350OE
F{rY
lN(r
'
)
ofY
lNfn
@rl6i
(n
(E(,cr
-
CIL=Uds
t==oOE
oOCJ
oqo
oqo
(E(,O'
I
c
r-
L
=UdS6]=OOE
o)o)
tnsl
'
Fln(o<t
(\rnro<f
=E>
(!==:
3_
6
Ll
!
(ncorn
r{oqOtst
@NC,
l/
)
C-.
c
b>
E-
o
}i
1
3_
6
LU
('rqsf
oco
ooCi
C
b>
(!
=}J
|.

!
<l
F{e.
iN
r/
)qlnN
<l
C-.
,
1
l/
)N
0,,
L
LIa!
lf)e"-
lFlct
Oc!Oqlc!rir!Cd
Oqlst
riof!(nFlanG,
Pot-
r.r
)q]
l.r
'
)Fi
lJ
'
)Irr
)
ridfd.
(\nr/
)c{
ry
.
l
r/
1r{FlEt
O)
Fl,bO)nl/
)F{r-
{cG
oF
r!q?00c!q1NFlCG
I|.
\n@r-
lNG
r{IOl#Ficnt
Refinerv CHP Emission Test
Combined Turbine and Duct Burner
Turbine Rated Capacity
loiler Max Rated Capacity
Test Date
5,263
54,500
).1/2012024
kW (59 F @ 4100 ft elevation)
lbs/hr
Rur 1
)ate/time
Feed
water
Flow
tklbs/h r)
)uct Burner
3as Flow
ACFH}
Steam
Flow
( Kl bs/hr)
Steam
Pressure
I osip)
furbine
3as Flow
'lbs/hrI
Senerator
)utput
kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
lemo lFl
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(osil
7/2012024 :05 49.93 32.3? 51.2( 60.33 3,125.7 6,495.8:48.13 1.01
7/20/2024 L 49.53 32.32 5L.21 60.25 3,12 1.35 6,495.7!47.49 1.01
t/20/2024 L 47.82 32.31 50.7t 61.o2 3,125.53 6,495.6t 47.44 1.01
t/20/2024 2(50.85 32.3L 5 1.3t 60.74 3,124.4C 6,495.5(47.45 1.01
/20/2024 2 50.27 32.31 51.2f 60.7C 3,125.80 6,495.41 47.5C 1.01
t/20/2024 :3(5 1.18 32.31 5 1.2S 60.s3 3,125.60 6,495.3;47.6C 1.01
/20/2024 3 49.19 32.3L s0.8(60.7t 3,123.08 6,495.2 47.69 1.01
/20/2024 :4(51.41 32.30 5t.7t 60.44 3,722.28 6,495.1t 47.79 1.01
L/20/2024 50.79 32.30 51.6(50.07 3,126.19 6,495.0S 48.74 1.01
r/20/2024 .cf 50.29 32.30 51.5S 60.02 3.123.08 6.494.95 48.46 1.01
L/20/2024 5t.47 32.30 s0.9t 60.27 3,124.83 6,494.9(48.77 1.01
7/20/2024 :0(48.34 32.29 51.0;61.1C 3.127.75 6,494.8(49.13 1.01
L/2012024 :05 49.O7 32.29 51.2:60.67 3,726.92 6,494.77 49.52 1.01
{verage s0.03 32.31 51.2:60.53 1.t24.77 6,495.:It8.12 1.01
Run 2
)ate/time
Feed
water
Flow
I klbs/hrl
)uct Burner
Sas Flow
'ACFH)
Steam
Flow
tKlbs/hrl
Steam
Pressure
(psie)
f u rbine
3as Flow
'lbs/hr)
Senerator
lutput
kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temp (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(osil
Ll/20/2024 l2:2(48.27 32.31 so.76 6t,7C 3,130.60 6,496.7(s0.15 1.0(
l,/20/2024 t22!50.76 32.37 51.3:6L.22 3,126.92 6,496.1(50.55 1.0(
77/20/2024 72:3( 50.27 32.3t 51.1 60.92 3,728.76 6,496.Ot 51.13 1.0(
ll/2O/2O24 7231 49.17 32.37 51.11 50.94 3,123.08 6,495.9I 5 1.36 1.0(
L7/2O/2024 12:4(50.3C 32.37 50.27 61.9(3,1 11.54 6,495.9i s2.03 1.0(
17/20/202a 72:a 49.75 32.3(57.26 61.74 3,L24.O4 6,495.8;51.94 1.0c
LL/20/2024 12:51 49.45 32.3(51.36 67.47 3,t27.7C 6,495.81 51.3t 1.0c
17/20/2024 72:5!49.73 32.3C 57.42 60.8i 3,123.99 6.495.7!51.32 0.9s
77/20/2024 73:O(50.95 32.3t s0.86 50.9f 3,t28.23 6,495.69 57.2t 0.99
lI/20/2024 13:O!47.66 32.3(5L.2L 61.35 t26.92 6.495.63 5r.2!0.99
LI/20/202a B:1 51.01 32.3(5L.44 60.8C 126.92 6.495.57 51 15 0.9s
7I/20/202a 731 51.93 32.24 5L,46 60.3i 3.125.16 6,495.51 51 15 0.9s
7I/20/2024 73:2( 48.45 32.24 51.61 60.04 3,127.57 6,495.45 57.49 0.9s
\verage 49.8'32.3( s1.18 61.1t 3,125.03 5,495.8 51.24 1.00
Run 3
Date/time
Feed
water
Flow
(klbs/hr)
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(ACFHI
Steam
Flow
( Klbs/hr)
Steam
Pressure
(osigl
Turbine
Gas Flow
(lbs/hr)
Senerator
lutput
:kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
temp (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(psi)
Lt/20/2024 I3:2C 48.45 f2.2(51.51 50.04 3,121.57 6,485.79 51.45 1.0c
tI/2O/2024 732s 49.O7 32.LS 51.19 60.81 3,123.0t 6,485.57 51.44 1.0c
tt/20/2O2a B:30 5L.L7 32.Lt 5 69 60.3'3.124.6L 6.485.35 51.3S 1.0c
r./2O/2024 73:35 51.8i 32.L5 5 6 60.1 3,126.92 6,485.13 51.34 1.0c
rL/2A/2024 73.40 48.8!32.18 5 56 50.0(3,114.9C 6.484.91 s 1.51 1.0c
1l/20/2024 73:45 49.O7 32.7 5 .06 60.5:3,120.11 6,484.70 5L.7)1.0c
17/20/2024 73:50 5t.71 32.18 51.79 60.3r 3,L17.14 6,484.48 51.4t 1.0c
1I/2012024 13:55 52.0(32.77 sl.87 59.8(3,123.0t 6,484.26 51.1 1.0c
1I/20/202a 7a00 51.3:32.7 51.59 59.9(3,125.13 6,484.O4 50.8r 1.0c
11/201202a 7a:05 51.3S 32.77 51.72 60.1:3,t24.61 6,483.82 50.41 1.0(
LI/20/2024 l4:lO 48.4C 32.!t 51.55 60.5:3,126.92 6,483.60 50.2 1.0c
LL/20/202a LA|S 49.3(32.16 51.82 60.0;3.126.s9 6,483.39 50.0; 1.0t
ll/20/2024 ).4:20 50.8S 32.76 51.56 59.9;3.724.42 6.483.t7 49.8t 0.9s
lverage 50.2t 32.1 51.55 60.2( 3,123.01 6,484.5 51.01 1.0(
-
Refinery CHP Emission Test
Turbine Only Mode
[urbine Rated Capacity
fest Date
6,263 kW (59 F @ 4100 ft elevation)
11./20/2024
Ru I
Date/time
Feed
water
Flow
(klbs/hr)
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(ACFH)
Steam
Flow
(Klbs/hr)
Steam
Pressure
(nsig1
Turbine
Gas Flow
(lbs/hr)
Generator
Output
(kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temp (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(psi)
lLl20l2O24 L5:O5 20.45 0.00 1 1.13 44.32 3,1L8.27 6,493.75 5L.27 1.00
Lt/20/2024 Ls'L0 0.00 0.00 8.49 42.78 3,123.08 6,493.69 51.10 1.00
rL/2012024 t515 0.00 0.00 8.50 43.05 3,126.92 6,493.62 50.91 1.00
1,u20/2024 1s'.20 0.00 0.00 8.s0 43.30 3,L21.32 6,493.56 50.77 1.00
7u20/2024Ls.2s 0.00 0.00 8.50 43.55 3,L22.26 6,493.49 50.64 1.00
Average 4.09 0.00 9.O2 43.40 3,L22.37 6,493.6 50.94 1.00
Run 2
Date/time
Feed
water
Flow
(klbs/hr)
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(AcFH)
Steam
Flow
(Klbs/hr)
Steam
Pressure
(psie)
Turbine
Gas Flow
(lbs/hr)
Generator
Output
(kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temp (F)
Turbine
Air Inlet
Filter
dP(psi)
tU20/2024 15:32 0.00 0.00 8.63 44.06 3,L30.77 6,502.63 50.55 1.0c
LL/2012024 L5:37 0.00 0.oo 8.62 44.01 3.128.36 6,502.67 50.44 1.0c
Lu2012024ls.42 0.00 0.00 8.62 44.65 3,125.28 6,502.7t 50.33 1.0c
Lt/2012O2a 15:47 0.00 0.00 8.61 45.57 3.729.32 6,502.75 50.23 1.0c
LL/2012A24 $:52 0.00 0.00 8.60 46.39 3,L34.20 6,502.79 50.12 1.0c
Average 0.00 0.00 8.62 M.94 3,129.58 6,502.7 50.33 1.00
Run 3
Date/time
Feed
water
Flow
(klbs/hr)
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(ACFH)
Steam
Flow
(Klbs/hr)
Steam
Pressure
(psic)
Turbine
Gas Flow
(lbs/hr)
Generator
Output
(kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temp (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(psi)
ttl20/2024 t5:59 0.00 0.00 8.s9 44.4C 3,134.10 6,502.85 49.95 1.00
1U20/2024 L6:o4 0.00 0.00 8.59 43.35 3,132.08 6,502.89 49.84 1.00
tt/20/202416:09 0.00 0.00 8.58 43.40 3,L29.43 6,502.93 49.69 1.00
t7l20/2024 16'.1,4 0.00 0.00 8.57 43.48 3,L32.69 6,502.97 49.54 1.00
1.1.120/2024 76:L9 0.00 0.00 8.57 43.22 3,L34.62 6,502.85 49.40 1.00
Average 0.00 0.00 8.58 43.57 3,132.58 6,502.9 49.69 1.00
Refinery CHP Emission Test
Fresh-Air -Fire (Duct Burner Only) Mode
Boiler Rated Capacity
Test Date
35,000 lbs/hr
L1.l2t/2024
Run 1
Date/time
Feed
water
Flow
(klbs/hr)
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(ACFH)
Steam
Flow
(Klbs/hr)
Steam
Pressure
(psie)
Turbine
Gas Flow
(lbs/hr)
Generator
Output
(kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temp (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(psi)
LU21.12024 7:32 28.81 46.86 33.04 58.10 3.85 t.72 47.60 0.06
Lt/21/2024 7'.37 26.95 47.68 33.55 57.70 3.85 1.59 47.80 0.06
L1/2U2024 7:42 27.40 47.77 33.63 58.13 3.85 L.46 48.00 0.06
tt/2t/2024 7:47 26.74 47.36 33.45 58.01 3.8s L.32 48.20 0.06
|U2U2O247:52 27.30 46.95 33.20 57.45 3.85 1.19 48.39 0.06
ttl2l/20247:57 18.66 45.87 30.70 50.65 3.8s 1.05 48.08 0.0€
7t/21/202a 8:32 20.82 44.20 30.2L 45.L7 3.8s 0.11 49.55 0.06
Average 22.L4 45.99 31.89 53.27 3.85 0.9 48.40 0.06
Run 2
Date/time
Feed
water
Flow
(klbs/hr)
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(ACFH)
Steam
Flow
(Klbs/hr)
Steam
Pressure
(psie)
Turbine
Gas Flow
(lbs/hr)
Generator
Output
(kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temp (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(psi)
t2/L4/2023 L6:5L 24.97 45.69 32.24 42.45 3.85 1.61 42.62 o.22
121L41202316:56 23.48 46.O4 32.42 43.08 3.8s 1.49 42.44 0.27
12h4/2023 t7"OL 23.37 46.08 32.35 43.17 3.85 1.38 42.26 0.20
12/74/2023I7:06 25.27 46.t2 32.L8 43.24 3.8s L.27 42.08 0.19
72/!a/202317 r1 27.25 46.76 32.26 43.53 3.8s 1.15 41.90 0.18
l2lL4/2O23 17:L6 25.4L 46.2L 32.37 43.68 3.8s t.o4 41.72 o.t7
L2/14/2023 L7:5L 23.85 47.04 32.72 45.42 3.85 o.24 40.47 0.09
Average 25.05 46.4L 32.24 44.L9 3.8s 0.9 41.54 0.16
Rur 3
Date/time
Feed
water
Flow
(klbs/hr)
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(ACFH)
Steam
Flow
(Klbs/hr)
Steam
Pressure
(psie)
Turbine
Gas Flow
(lbs/hr)
Generator
Output
(kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temp (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(psi)
L2/r4/2023 r8Ot 27.86 47.O2 32.28 46.01 3.85 1.09 39.90 0.77
12114/2023 L8:AG 25.89 46.69 32.83 45.46 3.85 1.00 39.71 0.16
L217412023 L8:rt 26.98 46.47 32.63 44.62 3.85 0.91 39.52 0.15
L2/M/202318:tG 25.06 45.46 32.53 44.24 3.85 0.82 39.32 0.14
L2/Ml2o23 L8:21 23.08 46.45 32.35 44.76 3.8s o.73 39.13 0.13
DlLa/2023 L8:26 25.63 46.46 32.19 44.37 3.85 0.64 38.94 0.t2
DlLal2023 t9:o1 24.L8 46.44 32.25 44.58 3.85 0.01 37.95 0.0€
{verage 25.24 46.52 32.36 t14.53 3.85 0.5 38.86 0.11
I]I\/ISION OF AIR OUALITY
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Combined
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Kennecott Utah Copper
Company Contact:Sean Daly
Contact Phone No.801-204-2563
Stack Designation:Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:11/20/2024 & 11/21/2024
Review Date: 12/23/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 6.0 6.4 1.648 1.249
ppm
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
53.25 15.466
Contractor Information
Contact: Christopher N. Knott
Contracting Company: Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.
Address: 2730 Commercial Way Rock Springs, WY 82901
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:
8710

Round
Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Combined
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Kennecott Utah Copper
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.049 0.037 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.1.65 1.25 CO2 O2
ppm or % 21.19 26.40 5.18 11.42
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)3.97E-02 3.92E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 2.079E-06 2.053E-06
lbs./hr.1.35 1.33 5.19 11.36
ppm or %17.41 28.24 5.26 11.43
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)5.44E-02 3.62E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 2.788E-06 1.854E-06
lbs./hr.1.85 1.23 5.16 11.58
ppm or %23.34 25.50 5.26 11.63 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)5.19E-02 3.52E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 2.726E-06 1.851E-06
lbs./hr.1.75 1.19 5.19 11.33
ppm or %22.82 25.451 5.21 11.36 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Combined
Calibration Error Test
Test Date November 20, 2024 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.03
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
CC723454 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
EB0072206 04/01/32 High-level 24.03 24.03 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 41.61%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date November 20, 2024 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.90
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
CC723454 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
EB0072206 04/01/32 High-level 23.90 23.93 0.03 0.126% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 41.84%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date November 20, 2024 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 30.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
EB00l1606 09/16/31 Mid-level 15.00 15.07 0.07 0.233% Passed Cal.
High-level 30.00 29.99 0.01 0.033% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date November 20, 2024 CO
6.43 CS - Cal. Span 30.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
E80085254 07/27/29 Mid-level 15.00 15.16 0.16 0.533% Passed Cal.
High-level 30.00 30.01 0.01 0.033% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Combined
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofKennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 30.00 30.00 23.90 24.03
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 30.00 23.90 24.03
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 41.6%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.07 15.16 10.00 10.00High-Level 29.99 30.01 23.93 24.03
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.07 15.16 10.00 10.00
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.23% 0.53% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.07 0.16 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.03% 0.03% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.01 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.10 0.20 0.16 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.33% 0.67% 0.67% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.2 0.16 0
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.08 15.15 10.10 10.08
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% 0.03% 0.42% 0.33%
Difference TRUE 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.08
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:11/20/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX17.5 28.36 5.3 11.4 CO
0.0% 58.2% 94.5% 22.0% 47.6% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.01 15.07 10.03 10.05
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.20% 0.30% 0.13% 0.21%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.33% 0.67% 0.67% 0.00% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.17% 0.27% 0.29% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.466 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.19 11.36 83.46 29.28 29.28
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws #NUM!
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs (ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat InputBtu/hr Low Mid High
33.9255 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
12
3
4
5
6
7
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
1617
18
1920
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Combined
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofKennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 30.00 30.00 23.90 24.03
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Mid-Level 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 30.00 23.90 24.03
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 41.6%100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.07 15.16 10.00 10.00
High-Level 29.99 30.01 23.93 24.03
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.07 15.16 10.00 10.00
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.23% 0.53% 0.00% 0.00% ppmdv Difference 0.07 0.16 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.03% 0.03% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.01 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0 0 0 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.01 15.07 10.03 10.05
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.20% 0.30% 0.13% 0.21%
Difference TRUE 0.06 0.09 0.03 0.05
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:11/20/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
23.5 25.66 5.2 11.6 CO
0.0% 78.2% 85.5% 21.7% 48.4% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.13 15.12 10.06 10.04
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.20% 0.13% 0.25% 0.17%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.00% 0.17% 0.13% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.16 11.58 83.27 29.29 29.29
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
33.915 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final Vf Initial Vi
1
2
34
5
6
78
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
1819
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Combined
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofKennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 30.00 30.00 23.90 24.03
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Mid-Level 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 30.00 23.90 24.03
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 41.6%100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.07 15.16 10.00 10.00
High-Level 29.99 30.01 23.93 24.03
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.07 15.16 10.00 10.00
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.23% 0.53% 0.00% 0.00% ppmv Difference 0.07 0.16 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.03% 0.03% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.01 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0 0 0 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.13 15.12 10.06 10.04
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.20% 0.13% 0.25% 0.17%
Difference TRUE 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.04
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:11/20/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
22.9 25.57 5.2 11.4 CO
0.0% 76.3% 85.2% 21.8% 47.3% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 14.95 15.02 10.02 10.01
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.40% 0.47% 0.08% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.20% 0.33% 0.17% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.19 11.33 83.48 29.28 29.28
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
33.789 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final Vf Initial Vi
1
2
34
5
6 FT```
78
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
1819
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Turbine
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Kennecott Utah Copper
Company Contact:Sean Daly
Contact Phone No.801-204-2563
Stack Designation:Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:11/20/2024 & 11/21/2024
Review Date: 12/23/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 6.0 6.4 1.249
ppm 25.0 10.003
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #15.00 15.00
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
53.25 15.466
Contractor Information
Contact: Christopher N. Knott
Contracting Company: Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.
Address: 2730 Commercial Way Rock Springs, WY 82901
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:
8710

Round
Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Turbine
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Kennecott Utah Copper
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.037 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.1.25 CO2 O2
ppm corrected for %O2 10.00 1.77 17.91
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)3.83E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 6.448E-07
lbs./hr.1.30 1.70 17.84
ppm corrected for %O2 10.39 1.71 17.79
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)3.69E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 6.033E-07
lbs./hr.1.25 1.79 17.92
ppm corrected for %O2 10.01 1.71 17.77 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)3.54E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 5.694E-07
lbs./hr.1.20 1.83 17.97
ppm corrected for %O2 9.61 1.92 17.81 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Turbine
Calibration Error Test
Test Date November 20, 2024 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.03
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
CC723454 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
EB0072206 04/01/32 High-level 24.03 24.03 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 41.61%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date November 20, 2024 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.90
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
CC723454 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
EB0072206 04/01/32 High-level 23.90 23.93 0.03 0.126% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 41.84%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date November 20, 2024 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 30.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
EB00l1606 09/16/31 Mid-level 15.00 15.07 0.07 0.233% Passed Cal.
High-level 30.00 29.99 0.01 0.033% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date CO
6.43 CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Turbine
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofKennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 30.00 23.90 24.03
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 23.90 24.03
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 41.8% 41.6%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.07 10.00 10.00High-Level 29.99 23.93 24.03
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.07 10.00 10.00
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.23% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.07 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.03% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0 TRUE 0 0
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 14.95 10.02 10.01
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.40% TRUE 0.08% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.12 TRUE 0.02 0.01
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:11/20/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX5.4 1.7 17.8 CO
0.0% 18.1% 0.0% 7.2% 74.0% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.17 10.06 9.94
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.33% TRUE 0.25% 0.25%
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.00% 0.00% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.07% TRUE 0.17% 0.21%
Difference TRUE 0.2 TRUE 0.0 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.466 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.70 17.84 80.46 28.99 28.99
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws #NUM!
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs (ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat InputBtu/hr Low Mid High
33.9255 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
12
3
4
5
6
7
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
1617
18
1920
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Turbine
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 30.00 23.90 24.03
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 23.90 24.03
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 41.8% 41.6%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.07 10.00 10.00
High-Level 29.99 23.93 24.03
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.07 10.00 10.00
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.23% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.07 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.03% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0 TRUE 0 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.17 10.06 9.94
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.33% TRUE 0.25% 0.25%
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.06 0.06
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:11/20/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
5.1 1.8 17.8 CO
0.0% 17.0% 0.0% 7.7% 73.9%CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.09 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.38% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.06 9.94 9.89
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.25% 0.46%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Turbine
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofKennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 30.00 23.90 24.03
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00Mid-Level 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 23.90 24.03
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 41.8% 41.6%100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.07 10.00 10.00
High-Level 29.99 23.93 24.03
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.07 10.00 10.00
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.23% 0.00% 0.00% ppmv Difference 0.07 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.03% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.09 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.38% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0 TRUE 0.09 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.06 9.94 9.89
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.25% 0.46%
Difference TRUE 0.01 TRUE 0.06 0.11
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:11/20/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
4.8 1.9 17.8 CO
0.0% 16.0% 0.0% 8.0% 74.1% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.14 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.59% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.15 10.07 9.93
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.27% TRUE 0.29% 0.29%
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.21% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.1 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.23% TRUE 0.04% 0.17%
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.1 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.83 17.97 80.20 29.01 29.01
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
33.789 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final Vf Initial Vi
1
2
34
5
6 FT```
78
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
1819
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Burner
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Kennecott Utah Copper
Company Contact:Sean Daly
Contact Phone No.801-204-2563
Stack Designation:Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:11/20/2024 & 11/21/2024
Review Date: 12/23/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 6.0 6.4 5.942 2.271
ppm
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #15.00 15.00
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
53.25 15.466
Contractor Information
Contact: Christopher N. Knott
Contracting Company: Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.
Address: 2730 Commercial Way Rock Springs, WY 82901
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:
8710

Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Round
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Burner
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Kennecott Utah Copper
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.127 0.048 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.5.94 2.27 CO2 O2
ppm corrected for %O2 34.34 21.55 1.94 17.50
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.38E-01 5.05E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 2.636E-06 9.620E-07
lbs./hr.6.43 2.35 1.94 17.44
ppm corrected for %O2 37.58 22.53 1.94 17.40
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.18E-01 5.11E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 2.217E-06 9.584E-07
lbs./hr.5.61 2.43 1.97 17.48
ppm corrected for %O2 32.05 22.76 1.94 17.48 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.23E-01 4.34E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 2.240E-06 7.907E-07
lbs./hr.5.78 2.04 1.90 17.59
ppm corrected for %O2 33.39 19.358 1.95 17.53 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Burner
Calibration Error Test
Test Date November 20, 2024 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.03
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
CC723454 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
EB0072206 04/01/32 High-level 24.03 24.03 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 41.61%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date November 20, 2024 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.90
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
CC723454 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
EB0072206 04/01/32 High-level 23.90 23.93 0.03 0.126% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 41.84%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date November 20, 2024 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 30.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
EB00l1606 09/16/31 Mid-level 15.00 15.31 0.31 1.033% Passed Cal.
High-level 30.00 29.99 0.01 0.033% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date November 20, 2024 CO
6.43 CS - Cal. Span 30.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
E80085254 07/27/29 Mid-level 15.00 15.02 0.02 0.067% Passed Cal.
High-level 30.00 30.05 0.05 0.167% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Burner
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofKennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 30.00 30.00 23.90 24.03
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 30.00 23.90 24.03
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 41.6%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.31 15.02 10.00 10.00High-Level 29.99 30.05 23.93 24.03
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.31 15.02 10.00 10.00
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 1.03% 0.07% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.31 0.02 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.03% 0.17% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.05 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0 0 0 0
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.04 15.09 10.05 9.94
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.90% 0.23% 0.21% 0.25%
Difference TRUE 0.27 0.07 0.05 0.06
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:11/20/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX22.1 13.27 1.9 17.4 CO
0.0% 73.5% 44.2% 8.1% 72.4% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.70% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.00 15.00 9.98 10.02
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.03% 0.07% 0.08% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.70% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.13% 0.17% 0.13% 0.17%
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.466 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.94 17.44 80.63 29.01 29.01
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws #NUM!
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs (ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat InputBtu/hr Low Mid High
46.41 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
12
3
4
5
6
7
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
1617
18
1920
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Burner
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofKennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 30.00 30.00 23.90 24.03
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Mid-Level 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 30.00 23.90 24.03
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 41.6%100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.31 15.02 10.00 10.00
High-Level 29.99 30.05 23.93 24.03
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.31 15.02 10.00 10.00
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 1.03% 0.07% 0.00% 0.00% ppmdv Difference 0.31 0.02 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.03% 0.17% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.05 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.70% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.21 0 0 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.00 15.00 9.98 10.02
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.03% 0.07% 0.08% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.31 0.02 0.02 0.02
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:11/20/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
18.5 13.19 2.0 17.5 CO
0.0% 61.7% 44.0% 8.3% 72.7% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 14.96 15.02 9.88 9.98
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.17% 0.00% 0.50% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.70% 0.00% 0.29% 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.13% 0.07% 0.42% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.97 17.48 80.55 29.01 29.01
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
47.523 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final Vf Initial Vi
1
2
34
5
6
78
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
1819
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP NOx CO 2024 Burner
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofKennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 30.00 30.00 23.90 24.03
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Mid-Level 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 30.00 23.90 24.03
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 41.6%100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 15.00 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.31 15.02 10.00 10.00
High-Level 29.99 30.05 23.93 24.03
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.31 15.02 10.00 10.00
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 1.03% 0.07% 0.00% 0.00% ppmv Difference 0.31 0.02 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.03% 0.17% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.05 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.29% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0 0 0.07 0.01
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 14.96 15.02 9.88 9.98
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.17% 0.00% 0.50% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.35 0 0.12 0.02
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:11/20/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
18.8 10.89 2.0 17.5 CO
0.0% 62.7% 36.3% 8.2% 73.0% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.02 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.33% 0.08%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.11 15.02 9.99 9.97
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.67% 0.00% 0.04% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.50% 0.00% 0.46% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.90 17.59 80.51 29.01 29.01
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
47.0085 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final Vf Initial Vi
1
2
34
5
6 FT```
78
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
1819
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog