DAQ-2025-001768

1

DAQC-298-25
Site ID 10313 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – GRAYMONT WESTERN US INC.

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: March 21, 2025

SUBJECT: Location: Cricket Mountain, 32 Miles Southwest of Delta, Millard County, Utah
Contact: Eric Bennett – 435-864-5770
Tester: Mostardi Platt.
Source: Kilns 1, 2, 3 and D-591, D-415
FRS ID#: UT0000004902700005
Permit# 2700005004 Date of last revision: April 1, 2024
Subject: Review of Pretest Protocol dated March 13, 2025
On March 17, 2025, the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a protocol for testing of the
Graymont Western US Inc. Kilns 1, 2, 3, and D-591, D-415 stacks at the Cricket Mountain facility
located 32 miles southwest of Delta, Utah. Testing for Kiln 3 and D-591 is scheduled for the week of May
19, 2025, and testing for Kilns 1, 2, and D-415 is scheduled the week of August 11, 2025. Testing is to
determine compliance with Permit Conditions II.B.2.b, II.B.2.c, II.B.2.d, II.B.3.b, II.B.3.c, II.B.3.d,
II.B.4.b, II.B.4.c, II.B.4.d, II.B.9.b, and II.B.12.c.

PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:

1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses for stacks: OK
2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate: OK
3. RM 3A used to determine dry molecular weight of the gas stream: OK
4. RM 4 used to determine the moisture content of the gas stream: OK
5. RM 5 used to determine particulate emissions: OK
6. RM 6C used to determine SO2 concentrations of emissions: OK
7. RM 7E used to determine NOX concentrations of emissions: OK
8. RM 201A used to determine PM10 emissions: OK
9. RM 202 used to determine condensable particulate emissions: OK

6 3
2

DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted.

CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable.
RECOMMENDATION: Send protocol review and test date confirmation notice.

ATTACHMENT: Pretest protocol dated March 13, 2025
YVYYV
DEPAIIIMENT OF
ENVIHONMENIAL QUALIW
l',lAH 1l 2.;.5
DIVISION OF AIB OUALITY
GRAYMONT
March 13,2025
Mr. Paul Morris
Environmental Scientist
Utah Division of Air Quality
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 - 4820
Re: Kilns 1,2,3, and D-591, and D-415 Notification
Graymont Western US lnc. - Cricket Mountain Plant
Title V Operating Permit # 2700005004
Dear Mr. Morris:
Graymont Western US Inc., Cricket Mountain plant is providing written notice that
Graymont intends to conduct stack testing on Kiln 3, and D-591 the week of May 19,
2025, and Kilns 1 , 2, and D-415 stack during the week of August 11 , 2025. Monday
May 19 will be the mobilization and setup day for Kiln 3 and D-591 , and August 1 1 as
the mobilization and set up day for Kilns 1,2 and D-415. The submittal of this letter
with the stack test protocol satisfies the minimum 60-day notification requirement.
All stack testing will be performed in accordance with Permit Conditions ll.B.2.b,
ll.B.2.c, ll.B.2.d, ll.B.3.b, ll.B.3.c, ll.B.3.d, ll.B.4.b, ll.B.4.c, ll.B.4.d, ll.B.9.b, and
11.B.12.c.
lf you have any questions, please call Eric Bennett at [phone], Cade Nielson
at [phone], or Quayde Garfield at [phone].
Colby Roberts
Plant Manager
P.O. Box 669
Delta, UT 84624
USA
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
MAR 1 1 2i:5
DIVISION OF AIR QUAUTY
*JJJ(d
frl9.$
o{dl.{(d+,ao
E
Compliance Emissions
Test Protoco!
Graymont Western US Inc.
Cricket Mountain Plant
Kiln 3 Stack (D-375)
and Kiln 5 Coal Silo Baghouse (D-591)
Delta, Utah
Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAO)
Title V Permit No.2700005004
Protocol No. P252112
mostardi?platt
Compliance Emissions Test Protocol
Graymont Western US lnc.
Cricket Mountain Plant
Kiln 3 Stack (D-375) and Kiln 5 Coal Silo Baghouse (D-591)
Delta, Utah
Protocol Submittal Date
March 13,2025
Prepared By
'lnru"1&tto, s
Rodney J. Sollars
[phone], Phone
[e-mail], Email
@ Copyright2025
All rights reserved in
Mostardi Platt
Protocol No. P252112
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.0 spEctFtc TEST PROCEDURES............... ..............1
3.0 TEST REQUTREMENTS ............ ..........3
4.0 PRoJECT SCHEDULE .................. ...........................3
5.0 PRoJECT PERSONNE1................ ...........................3
6.0 TEST METHODOLOGY............ ...........4
6.'1 Method '1 and 1A Sample and Velocity Traverse Determination .........,....... ..................4
6.2 Method 2 and2C Velocity Determination.................. .............4
6.3 Method 3A COz and Oz Determination ................. ..................4
6.4 Method 4 HzO Determination.................. ............ 5
6.5 Method 5 FPM Determination.................. ...........5
6.6 Method 6C SOz Determination.................. .........5
6.7 Method 7E NO, Determination................. ..........6
6.8 Method 9 Visual Emission Determination.................. .............7
6.9 Method 201A PMroDetermination................. .........................7
6.10 Method 202CPM Determination................. .........................7
7.0 QUALTTY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES............. .........................8
GENERAL INFORMATION APPENDED
Test Section Diagram
Sample Train Diagrams
Calculation Nomenclature and Formula
Calibration Data
Field Data Sheets
1.0 INTRODUCTION
A compliance emissions test program will be performed by Mostardi Platt on the exhaust of Kiln
3 Stack (D-375) and Kiln 5 Coal Silo Baghouse (D-591) at the Cricket Mountain Plant in Delta,
Utah. The Cricket Mountain Plant is owned and operated by Graymont Western US lnc. This test
program will be completed in accordance with Title 40, Code of Federal Reoulations, Part 63
(40CFR63) Subpart AAAAA "National Emissrbn Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) for Lime Manufacturing Plants",40CFR60 Subpart Y 'Sfandads of Peiormance for
Coal Preparation and Processing Plants'i and UDAQ Title V Operating Permit No. 2700005004.
The identification of individuals associated with the test program is summarized below.
2.0 SPECIFIC TEST PROCEDURES
Detailed test procedures are appended. Test runs will be performed for each constituent in
accordance with the following United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) methods.
1. The reference method traverse points will be selected in accordance with USEPA Method
1 and 1A, 40CFR60, Appendix A to ensure acquisition of representative samples of
pollutant and diluent concentrations over the flue gas cross section.
2. Gas velocity determinations will be performed at each test location in accordance with
USEPA Method 2 and 2C, 40CFR60, Appendix A. Gas velocity determinations will be
recorded concurrent with each compliance test run as part of the particulate test train.
3. Carbon dioxide and oxygen (COz/Oz) will be recorded concurrently with each test run in
accordance with USEPA Method 34, 40CFR60, Appendix A. Sample will be continuously
extracted and logged throughout the duration of each run with results being reported in
percent (%). Per section 8.6 of USEPA Method 2, in lieu of USEPA Method 3 or 3A a drv
molecular weiqht of 29.0 will be assumed at D-591.
Protocol No. P252112
Graymont - Cricket Mountain
Kiln 3 and D-59'l Compliance
Location Address Contact
Test Coordinator Graymont Western US lnc.
585 West Southridge Way
Sandy, Utah 84070
Hal Lee
Manager, Environmental Control and
Monitoring Systems
(801)716-26s2
[e-mail]
Test Facility Graymont Western US lnc.
Cricket Mountain Plant
32 Miles West of Delta (Hwy 257)
Delta, Utah 84624
Eric R. Bennett
HSE Technician
[phone]
eben nett@q ravmont.com
Testing Company
Representative
Mostardi Platt
5464 Stephanie Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89122
Richard J. Sollars ll
[phone] (phone)
[e-mail]
O Mostardi Platt
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Three (3), approximately sixty (-60) minute filterable particulate matter (FPM) test runs will
be performed from the exhaust of D-591 - such that a minimum sample volume of 0.85 dry
standard cubic meters (dscm) is collected - in accordance with USEPA Methods 1A,2C,
4, and 5. Preliminary analysis for PM will be performed on site. Results will be reported in
units of grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/dscf).
Three (3), one hundred twenty (-120) minute total particulate matter (TPM) test runs will
be performed at D-375 - such that a minimum sample volume of 60 dry standard cubic feet
(dsc0/1.7 dscm is collected in accordance with USEPA Methods 1,2, 3A,4 and 5,
40CFR60, Appendix A, and USEPA Method 202,40CFR51, Appendix M. Preliminary
analysis for PM will be performed on site. Results will be reported in pounds per ton of
stone feed produced (lb/ton) and grldscf.
Three (3), sixty (60) minute visualemission (VE) determinations will be performed at D-591
in accordance with USEPA Method 9, 40CFR60, Appendix A. lf during the initial 30
minutes, all 6-minute averages are less than or equal to half the opacity limit, the
observation period will be reduced to 30 minutes, otherwise readings will continue for 60
minutes. VE observations will be performed concurrently with PM testing at each testing
locations. VE observations will be performed by Graymont personnel where applicable.
Three (3), sixty (60) minute sulfur dioxide (SOz) test runs will be performed at the D-375 in
accordance with USEPA Method 6C, 40CFR60, Appendix A. Each run will be sixty (60)
minutes in duration. Results will be reported in lb/hr.
Three (3), sixty (60) minute nitrogen oxldes (NOx) test runs will be performed at D-375
Stack in accordance with USEPA Method 7E,40CFR60, Appendix A. Each run will be sixty
(60) minutes in duration. Results will be reported in lb/hr.
9. Three (3) filterable particulate matter emissions equal to or less than a nominal
aerodynamic diameter of 10 micrometers (PMro) will be performed at D-375 Stack in
accordance with USEPA Method 201A, 40CFR51, Appendix M. Each run will be one
hundred twenty (120) minutes in duration. Results will be reported in lb/hr and gr/dscf.
Protocol No. P252112
Graymont - Cricket Mountain
Kiln 3 and D-591 Compliance O Mostardi Platt
Test
Locations Emission Limits Test
Parameters Test Method
D-375
0.020 grldscf
7.49|b/hr
0.10 lb/ton of stone
feed
TPM USEPA 5, 40CFR60, Appendix A,
and USEPA 202, 40CFR51, Appendix M
0.016 gr/dscf
7.54lblhr PMro USEPA Method 201A,40CFR51, Appendix M
27.2 tbthr SOz USEPA Method 6C, 40CFR60, Appendix A
160.0|b/hr NO,USEPA Method 7E, 40CFR60, Appendix A
15% opacity VE USEPA Method 9, 40CFR60, Appendix A
D-sg1 0.010 gr/dscf FPM USEPA Method 5, 40CFR60, Appendix A
10% opacity VE USEPA Method 9, 40CFR60, Appendix A
3.0 TEST REQUIREMENTS
4.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
Mostardi Platt will provide the scope of services described above according to the following
schedule:
Day Activity
On-Site
Hours
5t19t2025 Mobilize to job site & set up test equipment.4
5t20t2025 Perform testing on K-3.10
5t21t2025 Perform testing on D-591.
Break down test equipment & demobilize from job site.8
5.0 PROJECT PERSONNEL
Mostardi Platt will provide the following personnel to conduct the scope of services described
above:
1 Project Manager
1 Test Engineer
1 Test Technician
1 Visual Emission Reader
Protocol No. P252112
Graymont - Cricket Mountain
Kiln 3 and D-591 Compliance @ Mostardi Platt
6.0 TEST METHODOLOGY
Emission testing will be conducted following the methods specified in 40CFR 60, Appendix A.
Schematics of the sampling trains and data sheets to be used are appended.
The following methodologies will be performed during the test program:
6.1 Method 1 and 1A Sample and Velocity Traverse Determination
Test measurement points are selected in accordance with Methods 1 or 1A, 40CFR60, Appendix
A. The characteristic of the measurement location is summarized below.
Twelve points will be sampled during run 1 of the gaseous sampling. Sample points for runs 2 and 3 will be selected
based on the stratification results. Upstream and downstream measurements will be verified prior to sampling.
6.2 Method 2 and 2C Velocity Determination
Gas velocity is measured following Method 2 or 2C,40CFR60, Appendix A, for purposes of
calculating stack gas volumetric flow rate and emission rates on a lb/hr basis. An Stype pitot
tube, as a component of the isokinetic sampling trains, differential pressure gauge, thermocouple,
and tdmperature readout are used to determine gas velocity at each sample point utilizing method
2. Standard pitot tubes will be utilized for Method 2C traverses if doing simultaneous flow
readings. lf pre/post readings are conducted then an S-type pitot tube will be utilized.
For D-591 testing, molecular weight will be determined in accordance with Section 8.6 of Method
2, which states that for processes emitting essentially air a dry molecular weight of 29.0 will be
assumed. All the equipment used is calibrated in accordance with the specifications of the
Method. Calibration data is appended to the final report.
6.3 Method 3A COz and Oz Determination
Stack gas COz concentrations are determined in accordance with Method 3A. A Carbon Dioxide
Analyzer is used to determine COz concentrations in the manner specified in the Method. The
instrument has a nondispersive infrared-based detector and operates in the nominal range of 0%
to 80% COz.
An Oz analyzer will be used to determine Oe concentrations in the stack gas in accordance with
Method 34, 40CFR60. This instrument has a paramagnetic detector and operates in the nominal
range of Oo/o to 25o/o Oz. High-range calibrations will be performed using Protocol One gas. Zero
nitrogen (a low ppm pollutant in balance nitrogen calibration gases) will be introduced during other
instrument calibrations to check instrument zero. High- and a mid-range % Oz levels in balance
Protocol No. P252112
Graymont - Cricket Mountain
Kiln 3 and D-591 Compliance
Sample Point Selection
TEST POINT INFORMATION
Location
Stack
Dimensions
(lnches)
Stack Area
(Square
Feet)
Upstream
Diameters
Downstream
Diameters
Test
Parameter
Number of
Sampling
Points
D-375
Stack
81.9
diameter 36.670 4.4 7.0
NOx, SOz 3
TPM, PMro 24
D-591
Stack
7.5
diameter 44.179 8.0 (PM)
16.0 (Flows)
10 0 (PM)
2.0 (Flows)FPM 12
@ Mostardi Platt
nitrogen will also be introduced. Zero and mid-range calibrations will be performed using USEPA
Protocol gas after each test run.
A list of calibration gases used and the results of all calibration and other required quality
assurance checks will be appended to the final report. Copies of calibration gas certifications will
also be appended to the final report. This testing will meet the performance specifications as
outlined in the Method.
5.4 Method 4 HzO Determination
Stack gas moisture content will be determined using a Method 4 sampling train as a component
of the Method 5 sampling system. ln this technique, stack gas is drawn through a series of four
impingers. The first two impingers are each charged with 100 mL of deionized, distilled water.
lmpinger three is left empty and impinger four is charged with clean, dried silica gel. The entire
impinger train is measured or weighed before and after each test run to determine the mass of
moisture condensed.
During testing, the sample train will be operated in the manner specified in USEPA Method 4. All
of the data specified in Method 4 (gas volume, delta H, impinger outlet well temperature, etc.) will
be recorded on field data sheets.
All of the equipment used is calibrated in accordance with the specifications of the Method.
Calibration data will be appended to the final report.
6.5 Method 5 FPM Determination
Stack gas filterable PM concentrations and emission rates are determined in accordance with
Method 5. The probe and filter exit will be maintained at a temperature of 248F +l- 25oF. An
Environmental Supply Company, lnc. sampling train is used to sample stack gas at an isokinetic
rate. The Method 5 train will be run in conjunction with Method 202.The impingers will be weighed
prior to and after each test run in order to determine moisture content of the stack gas.
PM in the sample probe will be recovered utilizing acetone; a minimum of three passes of the
probe brush through the entire probe will be performed, followed by a visual inspection of the
acetone exiting the probe. lf the acetone solution exiting the probe is clear, the wash will be
considered complete, if not, another pass of the brush through the probe will be made and
inspected untilthe solution is clear. The nozzle will then be removed from the probe and cleaned
in a similar manner, utilizing an appropriately sized nozzle brush. lt is anticipated that the filter
and filter housing will be recovered in the Mostardi Platt mobile laboratory. The filter housing will
be washed a minimum of three times with acetone and inspected for cleanliness, and the filter
will be placed in its corresponding petri dish. The acetone wash and the filter will be labeled and
marked, then analyzed at Mostardi Platt's laboratory in Denver, Colorado.
All of the equipment used is calibrated in accordance with the specifications of the Method.
Calibration data will be appended to the final report.
6.6 Method 6C SOz Determination
Stack gas SOz concentrations and emission rates will be determined in accordance with USEPA
Method 6C, 40CFR60, Appendix A. The instrument will be operated in the nominal range of 0
ppm to 200 ppm with the specific range determined by the high-level span calibration gas.
Protocol No. P252112
Graymont - Cricket Mountain
Kiln 3 and D-591 Compliance O Mostardi Platt
The SOz analyzers are based on the principle that SOz molecules absorb ultraviolet (UV) light
and become excited at one wavelength, then decay to a lower energy state emitting UV light at a
different wavelength. Specifically,
SO2 + hvr--rSOz*---SO2 + 7v,
The sample is drawn into the analyzer through the sample bulkhead. The sample passes a
pressure sensor then flows through a capillary and a flow sensor. The sample then flows into the
fluorescence chamber, where pulsating UV light excites the SOz molecules. The condensing lens
focuses the pulsating UV light into the mirror assembly. The mirror assembly contains four
selective mirrors that reflect only the wavelengths which excite SOz molecules. As the excited
SOz molecules decay to lower energy states they emit UV light that is proportional to the SOz
concentration. The bandpass filter allows only the wavelengths emitted by the excited SOz
molecules to reach the photomultiplier tube (PMT). The PMT detects the UV light emission from
the decaying SOz molecules. The photodetector, located at the back of the fluorescence chamber,
continuously monitors the pulsating UV light source and is connected to a
compensates for fluctuations in the UV light.
The sample then flows to the pump and is exhausted out the exhaust bulkhead of the analyzer.
The analyzer outputs the SOz concentration to the front panel display and the analog outputs.
The entire system will be calibrated in accordance with the Method, using USEPA Protocol gases
introduced at the probe, before and after each test run. A list of calibration gases used and the
results of all calibration and other required quality assurance checks will be found in the Appendix
of the final report. Copies of calibration gas certifications will be found in the Appendix of the final
report. This testing will meet the performance specifications as outlined in the Method.
6.7 Method 7E NO, Determination
USEPA Method 7E is used for determining nitrogen oxides (NO,) emissions from the combustion
turbine stack. A gas sample is continuously extracted from the gas stream through a heated
sampling probe. A portion of the sample stream is conveyed via a sampling line to the gas
analyzer for determination of NO, content. Prior to emissions sampling the NO/NO* analyzer is
zeroed and calibrated. A high-level gas (this will result in the measurements being 20 to 100
percent of the calibration span), mid-level gas (40 to 60 percent of the calibration span), and a
low-level gas (less than 20 percent of the calibration span) are introduced into the NO, sampling
system for Method 7E.
The sample gas manifold is then adjusted for emissions sampling. ln the course of the testing,
the zeroes are checked and mid-level NOx gas is introduced into the sampling system to check
calibration.
The chemiluminescent reaction of NO and Os provides the basis for this instrument operation.
Specifically:
NO+03--+NO2+02+h,
where h, : light
Light emission results when electronically excited NOz molecules revert to their ground state. To
measure NO concentrations, the gas sample to be analyzed is blended with Og in a reaction
chamber. The resulting chemiluminescence is monitored through an optical filter by a high-
sensitivity photomultiplier positioned at
Protocol No. P252112
Graymont - Cricket Mountain
Kiln 3 and D-591 Compliance
one end of the chamber. The filter/photomultiplier
O Mostardi Platt
combination responds to light in a narrow-wavelength band unique to the above reaction (hence,
no interference). The output from the photomultiplier is linearly proportional to the NO
concentration.
To measure NO, concentrations (i.e., NO plus NO2), the sample gas flow is diverted through a
NOzto-NO converter. The chemiluminescent response in the reaction chamber to the converted
effluent is linearly proportionalto the NO, concentration entering the converter. The instrument is
operated in the NO* mode during alltest and calibration.
6.8 Method 9 Visual Emission Determination
Visible emissions are determined in accordance with Method 9, 40CFR60, Appendix A. Visible
emissions observations are conducted and recorded by a person who is a certified visual
emissions observer during the filterable particulate matter run. A copy of the readers' certification
will be presented in the Appendix of the final report.
6.9 Method 201A PMro Determination
Stack gas PMro concentrations and emission rates will be determined in accordance with Method
2OlAfor determination of particulate matter less than 10. An Environmental Supply Company,
lnc. sampling train will be used to sample stack gas at a constant rate, as specified in the Method.
The EPA Method 201A train will determine the total particulate mass emission rate. The EPA
Method 201A train will determine the various mass fractions of PMro, and total PM. The mass
fractions determined from M201A willthen be applied to the total particulate number determined
from the M5l202train.
6.10 Method 202 CPM Determination
Flue gas condensable particulate concentrations and emission rates will be determined in
accordance with the Method 202, in conjunction with Method 5 filterable particulate matter
sampling. Condensable particulate matter is collected in the impinger portion of the sampling train.
The condensable particulate matter (CPM) is collected in impingers after filterable particulate
matter material is collected utilizing Method 5. The organic and aqueous fractions are then taken
to dryness and weighed. The total of allfractions represents the CPM. Compared to the December
17, 1991 promulgated Method 202, this Method includes the addition of a condenser, followed by
a water dropout impinger immediately after the final heated filter. One modified Greenburg Smith
impinger and an ambient temperature filter follow the water dropout impinger. A schematic of the
sampling train configured with these updates is found in the Appendix.
CPM is collected in the water dropout, modified Greenburg Smith impinger and ambient filter
portion of the sampling train as described in this Method. The impinger contents are purged with
nitrogen (N2) immediately after sample collection to remove dissolved sulfur dioxide (SO2) gases
from the impingers. The impinger solution is then extracted with Dl water, acetone, and hexane.
The organic and aqueous fractions are dried and the residues weighed. The total of the aqueous,
organic, and ambient filter fractions represents the CPM. A field blank and reagent blanks will be
collected. The samples will be analyzed off site at the Mostardi Platt laboratory.
Protocol No. P252'112
Graymont - Cricket Mountain
Kiln 3 and D-591 Compliance O Mostardi Platt
7.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES
Mostardi Platt recognizes the previously described reference methods to be very technique-
oriented and attempts to minimize allfactors which can increase error by implementing its Quality
Assurance Program into every segment of its testing activities.
Dry and wet test meters are calibrated according to methods described in the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Sections 3.3.2,3.4.2 and 3.5.2. Percent error
for the wet test meter according to the methods is less than the allowable error of 1.0%. The dry
test meters measure the test sample volumes to within 2% at the flowrate and conditions
encountered during sampling.
Mostardi Platt will incorporate the following additional QA procedures for this test program:
r Pitot tubes with wind tunnel derived coefficients will be utilized for testing.o New probe brushes will be utilized for testing. Anytime during testing that a probe brush
is found to be dirty, it will be replaced.. Teflon rinse bottles will be used for all reagents (acetone, hexane, deionized water).. High purity reagents will be used for glassware preparation, impinger catches, and
recoveries.o Certified, pre-cleaned amber glass sample bottles will be used for allwash collection.. Pre-test filter tares and verification weights will be performed within seven (7) days of the
test program.. A field train proof blank will be performed in house prior to mobilization and this sample
will be archived for potential later analysis.. Stack lD will be verified on site.. A pre-test null point traverse will be performed.. A pre-test probe wash will be performed. The probe will be heated to approximately 248oF,
then a preliminary wash will be performed. This wash will not be analyzed. A 2nd wash will
then be performed and this sample will be archived for potential analysis.
Field reagent blanks (acetone, hexane, deionized water) will be collected from the
remaining volume in the Teflon squeeze bottles used for this test program. This reagent
blank will be analyzed.
A field train recovery blank will be performed after run 1. This will consist of preparing the
sample train, then recovering as if it were a sample. These samples will be analyzed and
reported. The 202 fraction will be subtracted from the run results (up to 2mg)
Front half fractions will be weighed to a steady weight of +/- 0.3 mg.
Protocol No.P252112
Graymont - Cricket Mountain
Kiln 3 and D-591 Compliance O Mostardi Platt
APPENDIX
EQUAL AREA TRAVERSE FOR ROUND DUCTS
(TPM/PMro)
T
Length
> zDia.I
Test Location:
No. Sample Points:
Diameter:
Flue Area:
Upstream Diameters:
Downstream
Diameters:
Graymont
Cricket Mountain Plant
Delta, Utah
Kiln 3 Stack (D375)
24
6.833 Feet
36.670 Square Feet
4.4
7.0
Length
> 1l2Dia
1
2
3
4
5
o 7 I I 101112
123456
EQUAL AREA TRAVERSE FOR ROUND DUCTS
(Gas Compliance)
Length
> 112Dia.T
Length
> 2Dia.I
Test Location:
No. Sample Points:
Diameter:
Flue Area:
Upstream Diameters:
Downstream
Diameters:
Graymont
Cricket Mountain Plant
Delta, Utah
Kiln 3 Stack (D375)
3
6.833 Feet
36.670 Square Feet
4.4
7.0
EQUAL AREA TRAVERSE FOR ROUND DUCTS
(rPM)
Length
> 1l2Dia.
-T-
Length
> 2 Dia.I
Test Location:
No. of Sample Point
Stack Diameter:
Stack Area.
Graymont
Cricket Mountain Plant
Delta, Utah
Kiln 5 CoalSilo Baghouse (D591)
12
7.5 inches
44.179 inches
Job:
USEPA Method 2-Type S Pitot Tube Manometer Assembly
1.90-2.ff cm
(0.75 -1.0 in.)'
"Suggested (lnterbrence Free)Pitot tube/ Thermocouple
Spacing
I
T-
7.62 cm (3 in.)'
USEPA ilethod 2C - Standard Pltot Sample Train Dlagram
USEPA Method 5- Particulate Matter Sample Train Diagram
ATD-035 USEPA Method 5
USEPA Method 5/202- Condensable Particulate Matter
To "S" Bend
From Filter
100 mL Dl HzO
ArD-042 USEPA Method 5/202 8t1712015
USEPA Method 201a- PMro/PMzs Particulate Matter
-_From FiNter
ATD{170 USEPA t{rilpo 20lA PilrrPlrt:
USEPA Methods 3A, 6C, and 7E Extractive Gaseous Sampling Diagram
l-
co/oz [l llH-=- I
MOSTARDI PLATT
MOISTURE CALCULATIONS
(V, -V,)P RT
= 0.04707(v, _ Y)\ctstdt =
\/vwss(srd) -
P.,aM*
(wf-w,)RI,d
P,to M *
= 0.04715 (Wi - W,)
V.ruar = 17.7 14 Y-
\.rsar
\ctst.ll * V*sslstdy + V.tuor
Water vapor in gas stream, proportion by volume
Molecular weight of water, 18.015 lb/lilmole
Barometric pressure at the testing site, in. Hg
Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 in. Hg
ldeal gas constant, 0.048137 (in. Hg)(ft3)/(g-mole)('R) =
[2 1 . 8348(in. Hgxft3)/(ltrmole)(' R)]/453.592 g-mole/lb-mole
Absolute average dry gas meter temperature, 'R
Standard absolute temperature, 530'R
Final volume of condenser water, ml
lnitial volume of condenser water, ml
Dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter, dcf
Dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Volume of condensed water vapor, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Volume of water vapor collected in silica gel, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Final weight of silica gel, g
lnitial weight of silica gel, g
Dry gas meter calibration factor
Average pressure exerted on dry gas meter outlet by gas sample bag, in. HzO
Density of water, 0.9982 g/ml
Specific gravity of mercury (Hg)
Ttto/P.to
ft3/ml
"
t*'*#
T,"
+ V*sglstd)B*. =
B*" =
M*=
Pbr, =
Psta =
ft=
lm_
Istd-
[1 =
Vi =
V.=
t,Vm(std) -\,Vwc(sd) -\,vwsg(std) -
W-
\y'y', =
l=
AH=
Pn=
13.6 =
17.714 =
O.M7O7 =0.04715 = ft3/g
MOSTARDI PLATT
Volumetric Flow Nomenclature
A = Cross-sectional area of stack or duct, ft2
Bws = Water vapor in gas stream, proportion by volume
Cp = Pitot tube coefficient, dimensionless
Ma = Dry molecular weight of gas, lb/lb-mole
Ms = Molecular weight of gas, wet basis, lb/lb-mole
Mw = Molecularweightof water, 18.0 lb/lb-mole
Pua' = Barometric pressure at testing site, in. Hg
Ps = Static pressure of gas, in. Hg (in. HzO/13.6)
Ps = Absolute pressure of gas, in. Hg = Poar + Pe
Psto = Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 in. Hg
Qacrrn = Actual volumetric gas flow rate, acfrn
Qso = Dry volumetric gas flow rate corrected to standard conditions, dscf/hr
R = ldeal gas constant, 21.85 in. Hg-ft3/"R-lb-mole
Ts = Absolute gas temperature, 'R
Tsro = Standard absolute temperature, 530'R
vs = Gas velocity, fVsec
Vw(std) = Volume of water vapor in gas sample, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor
ap = Velocity head of gas, in. HzO
Kt = 17.714'R/in. Hg
o/oEA = Percent excess air
o/oCOz = Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis
%Oz = Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis
%Nz = Percent nitrogen by volume, dry basis
0.264 = Ratio of Oz to Nz in air, v/v
0.28 = Molecular weight of Nz or CO, divided by 100
0.32 = Molecular weight of Oz divided by 100
0.44 = Molecular weight of COz divided by 100
'13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury (Hg)
MOSTARDI PLATT
Volumetric Air Flow Calculations
Vm(std) = 17.647 ,r*rl (Poo,+t#])
1.,(450 +Tm)
Vw (std) = 0.0477 xVlc
Ar"=[Vw (std)
Vw (std) *Vm(std)
y 4 = (0.44 x o/oC 02) + (0.32 x o/oo 2) + [0.28 x (100 - o/oC 0 z - o/o0))
Ms = Md x (1- Bws) * (18 x Bws)
(Is + 450)
#xtlDPxcpx85.49
Acfm = 7s x Area(of stack or duct) x 60
scfm= Acfmxt7.64T >< [7ufu]
mtnScfh = Scfmx 60 ,o
Dscfm=Scfmx(1-Bws)
MOSTARDI PLATT
ppm Conversion Calculations and Factors
pom to lbs/scf
(ppm X) x (conversion factor X) = X lbs/scf
lbs/scf to lbs/hr
Dry ppm's with dry flow, and wet ppm's with wet flow.
(X lbs/scf) x (airflow scf/min) x (60 min/hr) = X lbs/hr
lbs/scf to lbs/mmBtu
Dry ppm's with dry diluent, and wet ppm's with wet diluent.
GOz - (X lbs/scf) x (F") x (100/COz) = X lbs/mmBtu
Oz - (X lbs/scf) x (Fo) x (20.91(20.9-0z)) = X lbs/mmBtu
Conversion Factors
NO'-1.19396x10-7
SOz-1.6625x10'7
MOSTARDI PLATT
lsokinetic
IKV =
Ma=
Ms=
Mw=
lIla =
Pbar =
Ps=
Ps=
Psto =
Qacrm =
Qso =ft=
7-lm-
Ts=
lsid-
Va=
Va* =
Wa=
Illn =
Vtc =V.=
Vwlstd) =!=
AH=
ap=
P"=
P*=e-
Kr=
Kz=
Ka=
o/oEA =o/oCOz=
o/oOz =o/oCO =o/oNz =
0.264 =
28=
32=
44=
13.6 =
fi=
An=
Bws =
Ua-
Uacf -
Up-
Nomenclature
Cross-sectional area of stack or duct, square feet
Cross-sectional area of nozzle, square feet
Water vapor in gas stream, by volume
Acetone blank residue concentration, g/g
Concentration of particulate matter in gas stream at actual conditions, grlacf
Pitot tube coefficient
Concentration of particulate matter in gas stream, dry basis, corrected to standard conditions,
gr/dscf
lsokinetic sampling variance, must be 90.0 % < IKV < 110.0%
Dry molecular weight of gas, lb/lb-mole
Molecular weight of gas, wet basis, lb/lb-mole
Molecular weight of water, 18.0 lb/lb-mole
Mass of residue of acetone after evaporation, grams
Barometric pressure at testing site, inches mercury
Static pressure of gas, inches mercury (inches water/13.6)
Absolute pressure of gas, inches mercury = Pu", t Pg
Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 inches mercury
Actualvolumetric gas flow rate, acfm
Dry volumetric gas flow rate corrected to standard conditions, dscfh
ldeal gas constant, 21.85 inches mercury cubic foou'R-lb-mole
Dry gas meter temperature, 'R
Gas temperature, "R
Absolute temperature, 528'R
Volume of acetone blank, ml
Volume of acetone used in wash, ml
Weight of residue in acetone wash, grams
Total amount of particulate matter collected, grams
Totalvolume of liquid collected in impingers and silica gel, ml
Volume of gas sample as measured by dry gas meter, dcf
Volume of gas sample measured by dry gas meter, corrected to standard conditions, dscf
Gas velocity, fUsec
Volume of water vapor in gas sample, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Dry gas meter calibration factor
Average pressure differential across the orifrce meter, inches water
Velocity head of gas, inches water
Density of acetone, 0.7855 g/ml (average)
Density of water, 0.002201 lb/ml
Total sampling time, minutes
17.647 "Rl/in. Hg
0.04707 ft3lml
0.09450/100 = 0.000945
Pitot tu be constant, gs.4g !:- f(
t o / t.u-:-To te ) !t!, u s tl1 / z
' ' sec I ('R)(rn. Hro) I
Percent excess air
Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis
Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis
Percent carbon monoxide by volume, dry basis
Percent nitrogen by volume, dry basis
Ratio of Oz to Nz in air, v/v
Molecular weight of Nz or CO
Molecular weight of Oz
Molecular weight of COz
Specific gravity of mercury (Hg)
vm(std) -
Vs=
MOSTARDI PLATT
lsokinetic Galculation Formulas
I Vw(std) : r,"(ff)ttf): KzVr"
2. Vm(std) = V,y 1+l Itto"'*t#lll = *, v, y
(po" *(#))
\r,J[ t"o ) rm
3Bws=ffifr-
a Mo =0.44(0/oCOz )+ 0.32(YoO2)+ 0,28(%N2 )
s M, = Mo(1- B*, )+ 18.0(B*r )
6c"=h
z. W. =C^Vr*p,
( mrp, Is cact=15'43Ki[Waffi;
g. Cs = (15.43 grains/gram) (mn/Vr1rr6, )
',g. vs = KoCorffi
t t. Qacfm = vsA(60sec/min )
12. esd : (36005gc/n, x1 - B*. ) v. [#:]) ^
ro E (emission rate,lbs/hr)= Qstd(Cr/ZOOO grains/lb)
TsVm(sta)TsVm(std)P
std
Iu
T
14. IKV =
15. %EA
v"dAnP.60(
o/oO2 -
P.V,4,K
o)
'=
CI
B*, )
1.5 o/ol
std
1-l
-(0
A
)
ne(t - a*, )
x 1000.264 %Nz - (%Oz - 0.5 %CO)
MOSTARDI PLATT
Site Specific Operating Limit (SSOL) Nomenclature
Ec' = Combined hourly emission rate of PM from the kiln and bypass stack and/or inline coal mill, lb/ton of kiln
stone feed production
EK = Hourly emissions of PM emissions from the kiln, lb
EB = Hourly PM emissions from the alkali bypass stack, lb
Ec = Hourly PM emissions from the inline coal mill stack, lb
Or = The operating limit for your PM CPMS on a 30-day rolling average, in milliamps or the digital equivalent.
L = Your source emission limit expressed in lb/ton stone feed
P = Hourly stone feed production, tons
R = The relative lb/ton-stone feed per milliamp or digital equivalent for your PM CPMS
Y1 = The three run average lb/ton-stone feed PM concentration
X1 = The three run average milliamp or digital equivalent output from the PM CPMS
z = The milliamp or digital equivalent of instrument zero determined
MOSTARDI PI-ATT
Site Specific Operating Limit (SSOL) Calculation Formulas
, pK.lb/ron - Er.,P
2. R= , '' ,lX,- z)
3. o,=r*+
4. Ec^ =
EK +EB +Ec
MOSTARDI PLATT
Procedures for Method 5 and Flow Galibration
Nozzles
The nozzles are measured according to Method 5, Section 10.1
Dry Gas Meters
The test meters are calibrated according to Method 5, Section 10.3 and "Procedures for Calibrating and Using Dry
Gas Volume Meters as Calibration Standards" by P.R. Westlin and R.T. Shigehara, March 10, 1978.
Analytical Balance
The accuracy of the analytical balance is checked with Class S, Stainless SteelType 303 weights manufactured by
F. Hopken and Son, Jersey City, New Jersey.
Tem perature Sensi ng Devices
The potentiometer and thermocouples are calibrated utilizing a NBS traceable millivolt source.
Pitot Tubes
The pitot tubes utilized during this test program are manufactured according to the specification described and
illustrated in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A, Methods 1 and 2. The pitot tubes
comply with the alignment specifications in Method 2, Section 10.1; and the pitot tube assemblies are in
compliance with specifications in the same section.
Dry Gas Meter/Gontrol Module Calibration Diagram
Dry Gas Metet No. _9!!!_Date
cdibnted By.
Baronetic Pessure
Standa,d Meter No
s/.adard Metq (V
Run Numbet
Oillice
s€,,ting in H 2(
iledetd Metel
Cas Voluffi
)ry Gas Meter
Gas Volum Temp. F"
)ry Gas Metet
dot Temp. F'
tdi
)ry Gas Metet
tudet Temp. F
)ry Gas Metet
qvg. Temp. Fo
td
Tire
Min
Tirc
Y Ct10 (H)
:inal
rutial
)ihnta ll o2a
=inal
nitial
)itteprce zl o.5o
=inel
nitial
)itleme 3l 0.70
.inal
nilial
)itlgturce al o90
:inal
nitial
)iltererce sl 1.20
:ind
nitial
)illerefta al 2OO
Sfack Tem peratu re Sensr Cal i brati on
Meter Box # :
Ambient Temperature :
Calibrator fi/bdel#:
Name:
Date:
Seial #:
Date Of Certification :
Pimary Standards Directly Traceable National lnstitute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
(Ref. Tenp.. "F + 460) - (Ted Tlrerm. Terp- "F + rEO) * 1o<= 1.5%o
Rd. Tenp., oF + 460
cM-1
OF
Reference
Source
Temoerature (o F)
fest
Thermometer
Temoerature f F)
Temperature
Difference 9/"
0 00
250 0.0
600 0.0
1200 0.0
S IYPE PITOT TUBE
Pitot Tub€ No: 1
INSPECIION FORM
Date:lnspectors Name:
WUHI
M)TI:
f1.05 q<Pr <r.so oL '^",
i
I
F---=>"')fl-,{;-,]-'-:1;
,a2
ii
:ll;--:-6\
Pitot tube assembly le\Bl?
Pitot tub€ op€nings damag€d?
3r= 1 o('10o),
br= O o('5o),
o.s ", o=t-
Calibration required?
gYes
yes (explain belo r)
6r= 1 o1<10o1
b2= 2 o(.5o)
1.s o,A= 0.93s (in.)
_yes gno
0 008 (in.); (<0.125 in.)
0.02s (in.); (<0.03125 in.)
!no
z=Asing=
w=Asinq=
Pr = 0.477 (in.), P6 = 0.477 (in.), Q = 0.375 (in.)
o.aE cr <D^ <0.95 cr(s/r6 rx.) t5lr rx.)
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
Project Number:
Client.
Test Location:
Date:
Operator:
Box Truck:
Analyzer
Type, S/N,
and Span
Cal
Level
Cylinder lD
Serial
Number
Expected
CalValue
Actual
Response
Difference
As%of
Span
Cylinder
Pressure
(psi)
Cylinder
Expiration
Date
COz Zero
Mid
High
Oz Zero
Mid
High
NO,Zero
Mid
High
SOz Zero
Low
Mid
High
Project Number:
Client:
Test Location:
Source Condition:
Test Engineer:
Duct Diameter _ ft
Flue Area
-
ft'
Port Length _"
Po"r
-
"HgStatic_ "HzOStatic_ "HgPr- "Hg
Volumetric Flow Rate Determination Field Data Sheet
Date:
Test Number:
Start Time:
End Time:
Test Tech:
Upstream Disturbance, Diameters
Downstream Disturbance, Diameters
Pitot lD Pitot Coefficient (Cp)
COz%
Oz o/o
Nz%
Meter No
Wet Bulb Temp
Dry Bulb Temp
B*t
Fluke #
Leak Checks Passed@
Pre _lnches HzO
Post _lnches HzO
UmbilicallD
Port-
Point #AP
Temp.
OF J^P
Null
Point
Angle,
Degrees
Port-
Point #AP
Temp.
OF J^P
Null
Point
Angle,
Degrees
Averaoe
44 x COzo/o + .32 x Ozo/o + .28 x NzTo = _ (Md)
_1-Bws) + (18 x_Bws) = _ (Ms)
Vsx
(-Md*
85.49 x
17.647 x acfin ,. Ps =
Ts "R
J^P :ftlsec (vs)
scfhscfrn x 60 =
Coxl-' I-Ms-
IM PINGER VI'EIGHT SHEET
PLANT:
UNIT NO:
LOCATION:
DATE:
TEST NO:
METHOD:
WEIGHED'TEASURED BY:
BAI.ANCE ID:
!MPINGERS
FINAL TOTAL INITIAL TOTAL TOTAL IMPINGER GAIN
SILICA
FINAL TOTAL INITIAL TOTAL TOTAL SILICA GAIN
llient:Pitot Tube Cp:
Iacility:Probe Length (Feet):
fest Location:Probe Liner Material:
)roject #:Sample Plane:Hrztl. or Vert
l'est Method(s):Port Length ("):
lest Engineer:Port Diameter ("):
fest Technician:Port Type:
Jpstream Diameters:Duct Shape:Circ. or Rect.
Downstream Diameters:Diameter (Feet):
I of Ports Sampled:Length (Feet):
I of Points per Port:Width (Feet):
Source Condition:Duct Area (Sq. Feet):
Diluent Model/SN:Minutes per Point:
VIid Gas I D/concentration:lo/ocoz %o2 Total Traverse Points:
lligh Gas lD/concentration :/o/ocoz %o2 Test Length (Min.):
Vloisture Balance ID:Train Type:
Comments:
DS-004 lsokinetic Sampling Cover Sheet
lsokinetic Sampling Cover Sheet
Bt-B#_R#
Vleter ID:
)itot lD:
rilter lD:
rilter Pre-Weight (g):
{ozzle Diameter ("):
Vteter Cal Factor (Y):
Yleter Orifice Setting (AH):
{ozzle Kit ID:
ndividual Nozzle ID:
Pre Pitot Leak Check:D "HzO gl "H:O (@ "HzO
Post Pitot Leak Check:@ "H:O 0 "H:O (@ "H:O
Pre Nozzle Leak Check:@ "Hg (!!) "Hg @ "Hg
Post Nozzle Leak Check:(g)"Hg @ "Hg (@ "Hg
]arometric Pressure,t'Hg:
itatic Pressure, "HzO:
lOz%o:
)zo/o:
Rev.3.2 1t1t2021
oy

B-
ED
O
=

.
tr
E
'

o
O
's
6
=

Elr
.9
d
rr
b
lt
oo
t-
d
o.
6
35
t
d
H=
o
=o
E
H=
F
=
r:
6
ll
.
b9
.
gE
+
-Y
i#E
*
E-
u
.
-
Es
!
5
s
ps
s
$
t
EE
s
E
s
9-
r
Fp
q
a
Ep
t
bl
-
g
i
=g
5
i
8P
r
EE
t
63
-
o.oEi=
,*o.
=
co
o-
EooFF
o
oo)F
ijooEfzo)o)o(LiioEo=oo)F
o(Eoo_oEoIoJooF
o)
-oEfzoo
ooU'(!
(EoE'
.gILE,
.ECL
tr(E@ootr
-Y
Oo6
go
C.go
Compliance Emissions
Test Protocol
Graymont Western US Inc.
Cricket Mountain Plant
Kiln 1 Stack (D-85), Kiln 2 Stack
(D-275), and Kiln 4 Stone Transfer
Baghouse (D-41 5)
Delta, Utah
Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAO)
Title V Permit No.2700005004
UJJ(d
trl9.$
o{dt{(d+,ao
EProtoco! No. P253310
mostardi?platt
Compliance Emissions Test Protocol
Graymont Western US lnc.
Cricket Mountain PIant
Kiln 1 Stack (D-85), Kiln 2 Stack
(D-275), and Kiln 4 Stone Transfer Baghouse (D-415)
Delta, Utah
Protocol Submittal Date
March 13,2025
Submitted By
iotu", S,tto, s
Rodney J Sollars
[phone], Phone
rosollars@mp-mail. com, Email
@ Copyrighl2025
All rights reserved in
Mostardi Platt
Protocol No. P253310
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.0 SPEC|FTC TEST PROCEDURES............... ..............1
3.0 TEST REQU|REMENTS............ ..........3
6.1 Method 1 Sample and Velocity Traverse Determination..................
6.2 Method 2 and2C Velocity Determination.................. .............4
6.3 Method 3A COz and Oz Determination................. ..................4
6.4 Method 4 HzO Determination.................. ............ 5
6.5 Method 5 FPM Determination.................. ...........5
6.6 Method 6C SOz Determination.................. .........6
6.7 Method 7E NO, Determination................. ..........6
6.8 Method 9 Visual Emission Determination.................. .............7
6.9 Method 201A PMroDetermination................. .........................7
6.10 Method 202CPM Determination................. .........................7
7.0 QUALTTY ASSUMNCE PROCEDURES............. .........................8
GENERAL INFORMATION APPENDED
Test Section Diagram
Sample Train Diagrams
Calculation Nomenclature and Formula
Calibration Data
Field Data Sheets
3
3
1.0 INTRODUCTION
A compliance emissions test program will be performed by Mostardi Platt on the exhaust of Kiln
1 Stack (D-85), Kiln 2 Stack (D-275), and Kiln 4 Stone Transfer Baghouse (D-415) at the Cricket
Mountain Plant in Delta, Utah. The Cricket Mountain Plant is owned and operated by Graymont
Western US lnc. This test program will be completed in accordance with Title 40, Code of Federal
Requlations, Part 63 (40CFR63) Subpart AAAAA "National Emission Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Lime Manufacturing Plants",40CFR60 Subpart OOO "Sfandards of
Pertormance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants", and UDAQ Title V Operating Permit No.
2700005004.
The identification of individuals associated with the test program is summarized below.
2.0 SPECIFIC TEST PROCEDURES
Detailed test procedures are appended. Test runs will be performed for each constituent in
accordance with the following United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) methods.
The reference method traverse points will be selected in accordance with USEPA Method
1 and 1A, 40CFR60, Appendix A to ensure acquisition of representative samples of
pollutant and diluent concentrations over the flue gas cross section.
Gas velocity determinations will be performed at each test location in accordance with
USEPA Method 2 and 2C, 40CFR60, Appendix A. Gas velocity determinations will be
recorded concurrent with each compliance test run as part of the particulate test train.
Carbon dioxide and oxygen (COzlOz) will be recorded concurrently with each test run in
accordance with USEPA Method 34, 40CFR60, Appendix A. Sample will be continuously
extracted and logged throughout the duration of each run with results being reported in
percent (%). Per section 8.6 of USEPA Method 2. in lieu of USEPA Method 3 or 3A a drv
molecular weiqht of 29.0 will be assumed at D-415.
1.
2.
3.
Protocol No. P253310
Graymont Cricket Mountain
Kiln 1 Stack, Kiln 2 Stack, and D-415
Location Address Contact
Test Coordinator Graymont Western US lnc.
585 West Southridge Way
Sandy, Utah 84070
Hal Lee
Manager, Environmental Control and
Monitoring Systems
[phone]
hleetOoravmont.com
Test Facility Graymont Western US lnc.
Cricket Mountain Plant
32 Miles West of Delta (Hwy 257)
Delta. Utah 84624
Eric R. Bennet
HSE Technician
(43s) 406-7102
eben nett@o ravmont. com
Testing Company
Representative
MostardiPlatt
5464 Stephanie Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89122
Richard J. Sollars ll
[phone] (phone)
[e-mail]
O Mostardi Platt
Three (3), approximately ninety (-90) minute filterable particulate matter (FPM) test runs
will be performed from the exhaust of D-415 - such that a minimum sample volume of 1.70
dry standard cubic meters (dscm) is collected - in accordance with USEPA Methods 1, 2,
4, and 5. ln accordance with 40CFR60, Subpart OOO if the gas stream being sampled is
at ambient temperature, the sampling probe and filter may be operated without heaters. lf
the gas stream is above ambient temperature, the sampling probe and filter may be
operated at a temperature high enough, but no higher than 121 deg. C (250 deg F), to
prevent water condensation on the filter. Preliminary analysis for PM will be performed on
site. Results will be reported in units of grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/dscf).
Three (3), one hundred twenty (-120) minute total particulate matter (TPM) test runs will
be performed at D-85 and D-275 - such that a minimum sample volume of 60 dry standard
cubic feet (dscf)/1.7 dscm is collected in accordance with USEPA Methods 1,2,3A,4 and
5,40CFR60, AppendixA, and USEPA Method 202,40CFR51, Appendix M. Preliminary
analysis for PM will be performed on site. Results will be reported in pounds per ton of
stone feed produced (lb/ton) and gridscf.
Three (3), sixty (60) minute visual emission (VE) determinations will be performed at D-415
in accordance with USEPA Method 9, 40CFR60, Appendix A. lf during the initial 30
minutes, all 6-minute averages are less than or equal to half the opacity limit, the
observation period will be reduced to 30 minutes, otherwise readings will continue for 60
minutes. VE observations will be performed concurrently with PM testing at each testing
locations. VE observations will be performed by Graymont personnelwhere applicable.
Three (3), sixty (60) minute sulfur dioxide (SOz) test runs will be performed at the D-85 and
D-275 Stack in accordance with USEPA Method 6C, 40CFR60, Appendix A. Each run will
be sixty (60) minutes in duration. Results will be reported in lb/hr.
Three (3), sixty (60) minute nitrogen oxides (NOx) test runs will be performed at D-85 and
D-275 Stack in accordance with USEPA Method 7E, 40CFR60, Appendix A. Each run will
be sixty (60) minutes in duration. Results will be reported in lb/hr.
9. Three (3) filterable particulate matter emissions equal to or less than a nominal
aerodynamic diameter of 10 micrometers (PMro) will be performed at D-85 andD-275 Stack
in accordancewith USEPA Method 201A,40CFR51, Appendix M. Each run will be one
hundred twenty (120) minutes in duration. Results will be reported in lb/hr and gr/dscf.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Protocol No. P253310
Graymont Crickel Mountain
Kiln 1 Stack, Kiln 2 Stack, and D{15 O Mostardi Platt
Test
Locations Emission Limits Test
Parameterc Test Method
D-85
Stack
0.020 gr/dscf
0.12 lb/ton of stone
feed
TPM USEPA 5, 40CFR60, Appendix A,
and USEPA 202, 40CFR51, Appendix M
0.016 gr/dscf
6.0 lb/hr PMro USEPA Method 201A, 40CFR51, Appendix M
22.4lblhr SOz USEPA Method 6C, 40CFR60, Appendix A
90.0 lb/hr NO*USEPA Method 7E, 40CFR60, Appendix A
D-275
Stack
0.020 gr/dscf
8.23 lb/hr
0.12 lb/ton of stone
feed
TPM USEPA 5, 40CFR60, Appendix A,
and USEPA 202, 40CFR51, Appendix M
0.016 grldscf
6.58|b/hr PMro USEPA Method 2014, 40CF R51, Appendix M
22.4lblhr SOz USEPA Method 6C, 40CFR60, Appendix A
120.0|b/hr NO,USEPA Method 7E, 40CFR60, Appendix A
D415
Stack
0.022 gr/dscf FPM USEPA Method 5, 40CFR60, Appendix A
7o/o opacity VE USEPA Method 9, 40CFR60, Appendix A
3.0 TEST REQUIREMENTS
4.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
Mostardi Platt will provide the scope of services described above according to the following
schedule:
Day Activity
OnSite
Hours
8t11t2025 Mobilize to job site & set up test equipment.4
8t12t2025 Perform testing on K-1 10
8t13t2025 Perform testing on K-2.10
8t'14t2025 Perform testing on D-415.
Break down test equipment & demobilize from job site.
8
5.0 PROJECT PERSONNEL
Mostardi Platt will provide the following personnel to conduct the scope of services described
above:
1 Senior Project Manager
1 Test Engineers
1 Test Technician
1 Visual Emission Reader
Protocol No. P253310
Graymont Cricket Mountain
Kiln I Stack, Kiln 2 Stack, and D{15 3 O Mostardi platt
6.0 TEST METHODOLOGY
Emission testing will be conducted following the methods specified in 40CFR 60, Appendix A.
Schematics of the sampling trains and data sheets to be used are appended.
The following methodologies will be performed during the test program:
6.1 Method 1 Sample and Velocity Traverse Determination
Test measurement points are selected in accordance with Method 1, 40CFR60, Appendix A. The
characteristic of the measurement location is summarized below.
points sampled during gaseous sampling. Sample points be selected
based on the stratification results.
6.2 Method 2 and 2C Velocity Determination
Gas velocity is measured following Method 2 or 2C, 40CFR60, Appendix A, for purposes of
calculating stack gas volumetric flow rate and emission rates on a lb/hr basis. An S{ype pitot
tube, as a component of the isokinetic sampling trains, differential pressure gauge, thermocouple,
and temperature readout are used to determine gas velocity at each sample point utilizing method
2. Standard pitot tubes will be utilized for Method 2C traverses if doing simultaneous flow
readings. lf pre/post readings are conducted then an S-type pitot tube will be utilized.
For D-591 testing, molecular weight will be determined in accordance with Section 8.6 of Method
2, which states that for processes emitting essentially air a dry molecular weight of 29.0 will be
assumed. All the equipment used is calibrated in accordance with the specifications of the
Method. Calibration data is appended to the final report.
6.3 Method 3A GOz and Oz Determination
Stack gas COz concentrations are determined in accordance with Method 3A. A Carbon Dioxide
Analyzer is used to determine COz concentrations in the manner specified in the Method. The
instrument has a nondispersive infrared-based detector and operates in the nominal range of 0o/o
to 80% COz.
Protocol No. P253310
Graymont Cricket Mountain
Kiln 1 Stack, Kiln 2 Stack. and D-415
Sample Point Selecffon
Test Location
Duct
Dimensions
Upstream
Diamebrc
Downstream
Diamebrs Test Parameters
Number of
Sampling
Points
Kiln 1 Stack 6.208 ft diameter 6.1 10.1
NO,. So2 121
TPM, PMro 16
Kiln 2 Stack 4.797 ft diameter 8.0 12.1
NO,, SOZ 121
TPM, PMro 16
D4'15 10.0" x '11.0"2.29 2.29 FPM 27
welve ooints will be samnled drrrino nrn 1 of the for rrrns ) and 3 will
@ Mostardi Platt
An Oz analyzer will be used to determine Oz concentrations in the stack gas in accordance with
Method 3A, 40CFR60. This instrument has a paramagnetic detector and operates in the nominal
range of 0o/o lo 25Yo Oz. High-range calibrations will be performed using Protocol One gas. Zero
nitrogen (a low ppm pollutant in balance nitrogen calibration gases) will be introduced during other
instrument calibrations to check instrument zero. High- and a mid-range % Oz levels in balance
nitrogen will also be introduced. Zero and mid-range calibrations will be performed using USEPA
Protocol gas after each test run.
A list of calibration gases used and the results of all calibration and other required quality
assurance checks will be appended to the final report. Copies of calibration gas certifications will
also be appended to the final report. This testing will meet the performance specifications as
outlined in the Method.
6.4 Method 4 HzO Determination
Stack gas moisture content will be determined using a Method 4 sampling train as a component
of the Method 5 sampling system. ln this technique, stack gas is drawn through a series of four
impingers. The first two impingers are each charged with 100 mL of deionized, distilled water.
lmpinger three is left empty and impinger four is charged with clean, dried silica gel. The entire
impinger train is measured or weighed before and after each test run to determine the mass of
moisture condensed.
During testing, the sample train will be operated in the manner specified in USEPA Method 4. All
of the data specified in Method 4 (gas volume, delta H, impinger outlet well temperature, etc.) will
be recorded on field data sheets.
All of the equipment used is calibrated in accordance with the specifications of the Method.
Calibration data will be appended to the final report.
6.5 Method 5 FPM Determination
Stack gas filterable PM concentrations and emission rates are determined in accordance with
Method 5. The probe and filter exit will be maintained at a temperature of 248oF +/- 25oF. An
Environmental Supply Company, lnc. sampling train is used to sample stack gas at an isokinetic
rate. The Method 5 train will be run in conjunction with Method 202.The impingers will be weighed
prior to and after each test run in order to determine moisture content of the stack gas.
PM in the sample probe will be recovered utilizing acetone; a minimum of three passes of the
probe brush through the entire probe will be performed, followed by a visual inspection of the
acetone exiting the probe. lf the acetone solution exiting the probe is clear, the wash will be
considered complete, if not, another pass of the brush through the probe will be made and
inspected untilthe solution is clear. The nozzle will then be removed from the probe and cleaned
in a similar manner, utilizing an appropriately sized nozzle brush. lt is anticipated that the filter
and filter housing will be recovered in the Mostardi Platt mobile laboratory. The filter housing will
be washed a minimum of three times with acetone and inspected for cleanliness, and the filter
will be placed in its corresponding petri dish. The acetone wash and the filter will be labeled and
marked, then analyzed at Mostardi Platt's laboratory in Denver, Colorado.
All of the equipment used is calibrated in accordance with the specifications of the Method.
Calibration data will be appended to the final report.
Protocol No. P253310
Graymont Cricket Mountain
Kiln"l Stack, Kiln 2 Stack, and D415 O Mostardi Platt
6.6 Method 6C SOz Determination
Stack gas SOz concentrations and emission rates will be determined in accordance with USEPA
Method 6C, 40CFR60, Appendix A. The instrument will be operated in the nominal range of 0
ppm to 200 ppm with the specific range determined by the high-level span calibration gas.
The SOz analyzers are based on the principle that SOz molecules absorb ultraviolet (UV) light
and become excited at one wavelength, then decay to a lower energy state emitting UV light at a
d ifferent wavelength. Specifi cally,
SOz + hyr---SOz*--- SO2 + |y,
The sample is drawn into the analyzer through the sample bulkhead. The sample passes a
pressure sensor then flows through a capillary and a flow sensor. The sample then flows into the
fluorescence chamber, where pulsating UV light excites the SOz molecules. The condensing lens
focuses the pulsating UV light into the mirror assembly. The mirror assembly contains four
selective mirrors that reflect only the wavelengths which excite SOz molecules. As the excited
SOz molecules decay to lower energy states they emit UV light that is proportional to the SOz
concentration. The bandpass filter allows only the wavelengths emitted by the excited SOz
molecules to reach the photomultiplier tube (PMT). The PMT detects the UV light emission from
the decaying SOz molecules. The photodetector, located at the back of the fluorescence chamber,
continuously monitors the pulsating UV light source and is connected to a circuit that
compensates for fluctuations in the UV light.
The sample then flows to the pump and is exhausted out the exhaust bulkhead of the analyzer.
The analyzer outputs the SOz concentration to the front panel display and the analog outputs.
The entire system will be calibrated in accordance with the Method, using USEPA Protocol gases
introduced at the probe, before and after each test run. A list of calibration gases used and the
results of all calibration and other required quality assurance checks will be found in the Appendix
of the final report. Copies of calibration gas certifications will be found in the Appendix of the final
report. This testing will meet the performance specifications as outlined in the Method.
6.7 Method 7E NO, Determination
USEPA Method 7E is used for determining nitrogen oxides (NO,) emissions from the combustion
turbine stack. A gas sample is continuously extracted from the gas stream through a heated
sampling probe. A portion of the sample stream is conveyed via a sampling line to the gas
analyzer for determination of NO, content. Prior to emissions sampling the NO/NO* analyzer is
zeroed and calibrated. A high-level gas (this will result in the measurements being 20 to 100
percent of the calibration span), mid-level gas (40 to 60 percent of the calibration span), and a
low-level gas (less than 20 percent of the calibration span) are introduced into the NO, sampling
system for Method 7E.
The sample gas manifold is then adjusted for emissions sampling. ln the course of the testing,
the zeroes are checked and mid-level NOx gas is introduced into the sampling system to check
calibration.
The chemiluminescent reaction of NO and Og provides the basis for this instrument operation.
Specifically:
NO + 03 --+ NO2 + 02 + h,,
where h, = light
Protocol No. P253310
Graymont Cricket Mountain
Kiln 1 Stack, Kiln 2 Stack, and D415 O Mostardi Platt
Light emission results when electronically excited NOz molecules revert to their ground state. To
measure NO concentrations, the gas sample to be analyzed is blended with Os in a reaction
chamber. The resulting chemiluminescence is monitored through an optical filter by a high-
sensitivity photomultiplier positioned at one end of the chamber. The filter/photomultiplier
combination responds to light in a narrow-wavelength band unique to the above reaction (hence,
no interference). The output from the photomultiplier is linearly proportional to the NO
concentration.
To measure NO, concentrations (i.e., NO plus NOz), the sample gas flow is diverted through a
NOz-to-NO converter. The chemiluminescent response in the reaction chamber to the converted
effiuent is linearly proportional to the NO* concentration entering the converter. The instrument is
operated in the NO, mode during alltest and calibration.
6.8 Method I Visual Emission Determination
Visible emissions are determined in accordance with Method 9, 40CFR60, Appendix A. Visible
emissions observations are conducted and recorded by a person who is a certified visual
emissions observer during the filterable particulate matter run. A copy of the readers' certification
will be presented in the Appendix of the final report.
6.9 Method 201A PMro Determination
Stack gas PMro concentrations and emission rates will be determined in accordance with Method
201A for determination of particulate matter less than 10. An Environmental Supply Company,
lnc. sampling train will be used to sample stack gas at a constant rate, as specified in the Method.
The EPA Method 201A train will determine the total particulate mass emission rate. The EPA
Method 201A train will determine the various mass fractions of PMro, and total PM. The mass
fractions determined from M201A will then be applied to the total particulate number determined
from the M5l202lrain.
6.10 Method 202 CPM Determination
Flue gas condensable particulate concentrations and emission rates will be determined in
accordance with the Method 202, in conjunction with Method 5 filterable particulate matter
sampling. Condensable particulate matter is collected in the impinger portion of the sampling train.
The condensable particulate matter (CPM) is collected in lmpingers after filterable particulate
matter material is collected utilizing Method 5. The organic and aqueous fractions are then taken
to dryness and weighed. The total of allfractions represents the CPM. Compared to the December
17,1991 promulgated Method 202, this Method includes the addition of a condenser, followed by
a water dropout impinger immediately after the final heated filter. One modified Greenburg Smith
impinger and an ambient temperature filter follow the water dropout impinger. A schematic of the
sampling train configured with these updates is found in the Appendix.
CPM is collected in the water dropout, modified Greenburg Smith impinger and ambient filter
portion of the sampling train as described in this Method. The impinger contents are purged with
nitrogen (N2) immediately after sample collection to remove dissolved sulfur dioxide (SO2) gases
from the impingers. The impinger solution is then extracted with Dl water, acetone, and hexane.
The organic and aqueous fractions are dried and the residues weighed. The total of the aqueous,
organic, and ambient filter fractions represents the CPM. A field blank and reagent blanks will be
collected. The samples will be analyzed off site at the Mostardi Platt laboratory.
Protocol No. P253310
Graymont Cricket Mountain
Kiln 1 Stack, Kiln 2 Stack, and D415 O Mostardi Platt
7.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES
Mostardi Platt recognizes the previously described reference methods to be very technique-
oriented and attempts to minimize allfactors which can increase error by implementing its Quality
Assurance Program into every segment of its testing activities.
Dry and wet test meters are calibrated according to methods described in the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Sections 3.3.2,3.4.2 and 3.5.2. Percent error
for the wet test meter according to the methods is less than the allowable error of 1.0%. The dry
test meters measure the test sample volumes to within 2o/o al the flowrate and conditions
encountered during sampling.
Mostardi Platt will incorporate the following additional QA procedures for this test program:
r Pitot tubes with wind tunnel derived coefficients will be utilized for testing.. New probe brushes will be utilized for testing. Anytime during testing that a probe brush
is found to be dirty, it will be replaced.. Teflon rinse bottles will be used for all reagents (acetone, hexane, deionized water).. High purity reagents will be used for glassware preparation, impinger catches, and
recoveries.. Certified, pre-cleaned amber glass sample bottles will be used for all wash collection.. Pre-test filter tares and verification weights will be performed within seven (7) days of the
test program.
A field train proof blank will be performed in house prior to mobilization and this sample
will be archived for potential later analysis.
Stack lD will be verified on site.
A pre-test null point traverse will be performed.
A pre-test probe wash will be performed. The probe will be heated to approximalely 248oF,
then a preliminary wash will be performed. This wash will not be analyzed. A 2nd wash will
then be performed and this sample will be archived for potential analysis.
Field reagent blanks (acetone, hexane, deionized water) will be collected from the
remaining volume in the Teflon squeeze bottles used for this test program. This reagent
blank will be analyzed.
A field train recovery blank will be performed after run 1. This will consist of preparing the
sample train, then recovering as if it were a sample. These samples will be analyzed and
reported. The 202 fraction will be subtracted from the run results (up to 2mg).
Front half fractions will be weighed to a steady weight of +/- 0.3 mg.
Glass vials or beakers will be used for rinse evaporations.
Protocol No. P253310
Graymont Cricket Mountain
Kiln 1 Stack, Kiln 2 Stack, and D{15
a
a
a
a
a
O Mostardi Platl
APPENDIX
EQUAL AREA TRAVERSE FOR ROUND DUGTS
(TPM/PMro)
Length
> 1l2Oia.T
Length
> 2Oia.I
Test Location:
Graymont
Cricket Mountain Plant
Delta, Utah
Kiln 1 Stack
No. Sample Points:
Diameter:
Flue Area:
Upstream Diameters:
Downstream
Diameters:
16
6.208 Feet
30.269 Square Feet
6.1
10.'l
EQUAL AREA TRAVERSE FOR ROUND DUCTS
(TPM/PMro)
Test Location:
Graymont
Cricket Mountain Plant
Delta, Utah
Kiln 2 Stack
Length
> 112 Oia.T
Length
> 2 Dia.I
No. Sample Points:
Diameter:
Flue Area:
Upstream Diameters:
Downstream
Diameters:
16
4.795 Feet
18.058 Square Feet
8.0
12.1
Disturbance
EQUAL AREA TRAVERSE
FOR RECTANGULAR DUCTS
*1 1"
I
10"
-diagram is not to scale
Job: Graymont
Cricket Mountain Plant
Delta, Utah
Area:
No. Test Ports:
Tests Points per Port:
1 10 Square lnches
3
I
Test Location: D-415 Exhaust
USEPA Method 2- Type S Pitot Tube Manometer Assembly
1.90-2.54 cm
(0.75 -1.0 in.)'
"Suggested (lnterference Free)Pitot tube/ Thermocouple
Spacing
I
T-
7.62 cm (3 in.)-
USEPA Method 5- Particulate Matter Sample Train Diagram
ATD-035 USEPA Method 5
USEPA Method 5/202- Condensable Particulate Matter
To "S" Bend
From Filter
100 mL Dl HzO
ATD-042 USEPA Method 5i202 8t17t2015
USEPA Method 201a- PMro/PMzc Particulate Matter
-
From Fitter
AID{176 USEPA lrlcilrorl mtA illtrPlfi!
]
USEPA Methods 3A, 6C, and 7E Extractive Gaseous Sampling Diagram
I
llr
_1
EI I
lllr
MOSTARDI PLATT
MOISTURE CALCULATIONS
V*.r.r.rr - (V' - Y',)-4* R T"a = 0.04707(V, - V, )wclslo) (,a M *
v*.,r.r,rr = (wt
= Y') R T'" = 0-04715 (wr. - w, )wsg(sto' P.,a M *
P,-* AH
V.,uor = 17.714 V",Y|E
T",
D V*c1sr,Jt + V*rgt.t.Jt
It ws V*c(srd) + V*rg{$dr * Vn,trr.tr
Where:
B,,. = Water vapor in gas stream, proportion by volume
M* = Molecular weight of water, 18.015 lb/ltrmole
Pb", = Barometric pressure at the testing site, in. Hg
Psto = Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 in. Hg
ft = ldeal gas constant, 0.048137 (in. Hg)(ft3)/(g-mole)("R) =
[2 1 . 8348(in. HgXft3)/(ltrmole)(' R)]/453. 592 g-mole/lb-mole
T. = Absolute average dry gas meter temperature, 'R
Tsto = Standard absolute temperature, 530'R
\rt1= Final volume of condenser water, ml
Vi = lnitial volume of condenser water, ml
V. = Dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter, dcf
Vm(sto) = Dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Vwc(su) = Volume of condensed water vapor, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Vwss(sto) = Volume of water vapor collected in silica gel, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Wr = Final weight of silica gel, g
\y'y', = lnitial weight of silica gel, g
f = Dry gas meter calibration factor
AH = Average pressure exerted on dry gas meter outlet by gas sample bag, in. HzO
p,, = Density of water, 0.9982 g/ml
13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury (Hg)
17.714 = Tsto/Psto
0.04707 = ft3/ml 0.04715 = ft3/g
MOSTARDI PLATT
Vol umetric Flow Nomenclature
A = Cross-sectional area of stack or duct, ft2
Bws = Water vapor in gas stream, proportion by volume
Cp = Pitot tube coefficient, dimensionless
Mo = Dry molecular weight of gas, lb/lb-mole
Ms = Molecular weight of gas, wet basis, lb/lb-mole
M, = Molecular weight of water, 18.0 lb/lb-mole
Poar = Barometric pressure at testing site, in. Hg
Ps = Static pressure of gas, in. Hg (in. HzO/13.6)
Ps = Absolute pressure of gas, in. Hg = Poa, + Ps
Psto = Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 in. Hg
Qac.rrn = Actual volumetric gas ffow rate, acfrn
Qso = DU volumetric gas flow rate corrected to standard conditions, dscf/hr
R = ldeal gas constant, 21.85 in. Hg-ft3/'R-lb-mole
Ts = Absolute gas temperature, 'R
Tsro = Standard absolute temperature, 530'R
vs = Gas velocity, fUsec
Vwlsto) = Volume of water vapor in gas sample, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor
Ap = Velocity head of gas, in. HzO
Kt = 17.714'Rlin. Hg
o/oEA = Percent excess air
o/oCOz = Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis
%Oz = Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis
%Nz = Percent nitrogen by volume, dry basis
0.2M = Ratio of Oz to Nz in air, v/v
0.28 = Molecular weight of Nz or CO, divided by 100
0.32 = Molecular weight of Oz divided by 100
0.44 = Molecular weight of COz divided by 100
13.6 = Specific gravig of mercury (Hg)
MOSTARDI PLATT
Volumetric Air Flow Calculations
(Poo, + [r*a])Vm(std) = 17.647r r-,
I ].,(460 + Tm)
Vw (std) = 0.0471xV1c
A,,r=[Vw (std)
Vw (std) + Vm (std)
y4 = (0.44 x 0/oCO2) + (0.32 x o/o?z) + [0.28 x (100 - o/oCO2 - o/00))
Ms = Md x (1- Bws) + (18 x Bws)
Acfm = 7s x Area (of stack or duct) x 60
lrrk.460)t r = Jffi x'loF x cp xl5.4e
scfm= Acfmxtz.647. l*uofu]
minScfh: Scfmx 60 ,nr
Dscfm=Scfmx(1-Bws)
MOSTARDI PLATT
ppm Conversion Calculations and Factors
ppm to lbs/scf
(ppm X) x (conversion factor X) = X lbs/scf
lbs/scf to lbs/hr
Dry ppm's with dry flow, and wet ppm's with wet flow.
(X lbs/scf) x (airflow scf/min) x (60 min/hr) = X lbs/hr
lbs/scf to lbs/mmBtu
Dry ppm's with dry diluent, and wet ppm's with wet diluent.
COz - (X lbs/scf) x (F") x (100/COz) = X lbs/mmBtu
Oz - (X lbs/scf) x (Fo) x (20.9(20.9-0z)) = X lbs/mmBtu
Conversion Factors
NO'-1.19396x10-7
SOz-1.6625x10-7
MOSTARDI PLATT
lsokinetic Nomenclatu re
A = Cross-sectional area of stack or duct, square feet
An = Cross-sectional area of nozzle, square feet
Bm = Water vapor in gas stream, by volume
Ca = Acetone blank residue concentration, g/g
Cact = Concentration of particulate matter in gas stream at actual conditions, gr/acf
Cp = Pitot tube coefficient
C' = Concentration of particulate matter in gas stream, dry basis, corrected to standard conditions,
gr/dscf
IKV = lsokinetic sampling variance, must be 90.0 % < IKV < 110.0o/o
Mo = Dry molecular weight of gas, lb/lb-mole
M. = Molecular weight of gas, wet basis, lb/lb-mole
M* = Molecular weight of water, 18.0 lb/lb-mole
ma = Mass of residue of acetone after evaporation, grams
Poar = Barometric pressure at testing site, inches mercury
Ps = Static pressure of gas, inches mercury (inches water/13.6)
P" = Absolute pressure of gas, inches mercury = Pu", * Ps
Psto = Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 inches mercury
Qacrm = Actual volumetric gas flow rate, acfm
Qso = Dry volumetric gas flow rate corrected to standard conditions, dscfh
R = ldeal gas constant, 21.85 inches mercury cubic fooU"R-lb-mole
T, = Dry gas meter temperature, "R
Ts = Gas temperature, 'R
Tsto = Absolute temperature, 528"R
V" = Volume of acetone blank, ml
V"* = Volume of acetone used in wash, ml
W, = Weight of residue in acetone wash, grams
mn = Total amount of particulate matter collected, grams
Vr" = Total volume of liquid collected in impingers and silica gel, ml
Vm = Volume of gas sample as measured by dry gas meter, dcf
Vm(sto) = Volume of gas sample measured by dry gas meter, corrected to standard conditions, dscf
vs = Gas velocity, fUsec
Vw(srd) = Volume of water vapor in gas sample, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor
AH = Average pressure differential across the orifice meter, inches water
ap = Velocity head of gas, inches water
p" = Density of acetone, 0.7855 g/ml (average)
p* = Density of water, 0.002201 lb/ml
0 = Total sampling time, minutes
Kt = 17.647 'R/in. Hg
Kz= 0.04707 ft3lml
Ka = 0.09450/100 = 0.000945
Kp = pitot tube constan t,85.49!L[r",'!i;r;::)fi;"r)"'
o/oEA = Percent excess air
YoCOz = Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis
o/oOz = Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis
o/oCO = Percent carbon monoxide by volume, dry basis
o/oNz = Percent nitrogen by volume, dry basis
0.264 = Ratio of Oz to Nz in air, v/v
28 = Molecular weight of Nz or CO
32 = Molecular weight of Oz
44 = Molecular weight of COz
13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury (Hg)
1 Vw(std) : u,"[ff)ttr): K2Vc
2Vm(sd, =vmYt+) [-#] =^,
MOSTARDI PLATT
lsokinetic Galculation Formulas
(P0,, +rffill
V,Y
Tm
l. Bws
+. Mo
5.
6.
9.
10
11.
12.
Vw(sto)
(Vm(std) + Vw(sto) )
= 0.44(o/oCOz ) + 0.32(0/oO2)+ 0.28(%N2 )
Ms = Mo(1- B*, )+ 18.0(B*r )
r\ ma
" V^P"
Wa = C^Vr*p,
c^^, = 15.43K,[ '.t. )"act - rv'Tvt\rIV*tuol
+ vr1.16y Tr,J
Cs = (15.43 grains/gram) (mn/Vr,oo, )
.vs=KoCr,ffi
Qactm = vrA(60r.c/min )
esd = (36oosec/hr )(1- B*" ) r. [+]) ^
rg E (emission rate,lbs/hr)= Qrto(C./7000 grains/lb)
14. IKV =
TsV,n1s161Ps16 -K4 TsVmlsto;
Ts16VsdAnPs60(1- B*. )Prv rAnd(1 - B*, )
o/oO2 - (0.5 %CO)15 %EA=(0.264 %Nz - (%Oz - 0.5 %CO)),. , oo
MOSTARDI PLATT
Site Specific Operating Limit (SSOL) Nomenclature
Ec' = Combined hourly emission rate of PM from the kiln and bypass stack and/or inline coal mill, lb/ton of kiln
stone feed production
EK = Hourly emissions of PM emissions from the kiln, lb
EB = Hourly PM emissions from the alkali bypass stack, lb
Ec = Hourly PM emissions from the inline coal mill stack, lb
Or = The operating limit for your PM CPMS on a 30-day rolling average, in milliamps or the digitat equivalent.
L = Your source emission limit expressed in lb/ton stone feed
P = Hourly stone feed production, tons
R = The relative lblton-stone feed per milliamp or digital equivalent for your PM CPMS
Yl = The three run average lb/ton-stone feed PM concentration
X1 = The three run average milliamp or digital equivalent output from the PM CPMS
z = The milliamp or digital equivalent of instrument zero determined
MOSTARDI PLATT
Site Specific Operating Limit (SSOL) Calculation Formulas
pKn K-lb/ton D1H-,P
2.R=, \ ,
lXr- z)
3. o,=r*+
rCm4.L =
EK +EB +Ec
MOSTARDI PLATT
Procedures for Method 5 and Flow Calibration
Nozzles
The nozzles are measured according to Method 5, Section 10.1
Dry Gas Meters
The test meters are calibrated according to Method 5, Section 10.3 and "Procedures for Calibrating and Using Dry
Gas Volume Meters as Calibration Standards" by P.R. Westlin and R.T. Shigehara, March 10, 1978.
Analytical Balance
The accuracy of the analytical balance is checked with Class S, Stainless Steel Type 303 weights manufactured by
F. Hopken and Son, Jersey City, New Jersey.
Tem perature Sensi ng Devices
The potentiometer and thermocouples are calibrated utilizing a NBS traceable millivolt source.
Pitot Tubes
The pitot tubes utilized during this test program are manufactured according to the specification described and
illustrated in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A, Methods 1 and 2. The pitot tubes
comply with the alignment specifications in Method 2, Section 10.1; and the pitot tube assemblies are in
compliance with specifications in the same section.
Dry Gas Meter/Control Module Galibration Diagram
Dry Gas Mctot No.
Sa,dad Meter No.
s/,adard Maler (n
cM-1 Dale:
Calibntod 8y:
Baromlic Pessure.
Odfice
]€ltiry in H ,(
*adad Mde
Ges Volum
)ryGas Pl€ier
Gas Vdure
XaDda1d M€4.o,
Temp. Fo
Ory Gas tubler
ldol Temp. F"
)ryGas fu,s'lq
tul6t Temp. F
Ory Ges l,€r'.er
Avg. Temp. F"Tim Tiffi
CIIE (H)
.inal
nilial
)ifrererce 1l o.2o
=inal
ritial
)ifiererce 2l O 5A
=inal
dtial
,tteffie 3l o.7a
=inal
nitial
,Iferefte 1l o ga
=ina!
nitial
)illame 5l 1.20
=inal
nital
)iienrce 61 2oo
Stack Tem perature Sensor Cal i brati on
Meter Box #
Ambient Tempemture .
Calibmtor ltlodel#:
Name:
Date:
Seial #:
Date Of Ceftification :
Pimary Standads Dircctly Truceable National lnstitute of Standards and Technolqy (NIST)
(Ref. Tenp.. "F + 460) - (Ted Therm. Term- "F + rEQ) * 100<= 1.5%
Rd. Tenp., oF + 460
cM-1
OF
Reference
Source
Temoerature (o F)
Ies(
Thermometer
Temoerature (o F)
Temperature
Difference %o
0 0.0
250 0.0
600 0.0
1200 0.0
Pitot Tube t{o:
Pitot tube assembly 16\€l?
Pitot tube op€nings demag€d?
81= I o(<1oo),
b1= o o(<5o),
o.s ", o=t-
gYes
lnspectors Name:
grp
z = A sin g = 0.008 (in.): (<0.i25 in.)
w = A sin q = 0.025 (in.); (<0.03125 in.)
Pa = 0.477 (in.), Ps = 0.47/ (in.), D\ = 0.375 (in.)
S TYPE PITOI TI'BE INSPECIIOII FORM
H
lrrctit-+!Ioii PlIxtS I
! i'-'-r-'-'qlr
ifi
ffir
i
xilEl-- F.os q<Pr <r.5o o
L r^-r,
*2-
h=
1
2
yes (6xplain balov\r)
o (.1 oo)
o (.st)
i.s o,A= 0.938 (in.)
Calibration pquiod?
-Y€6
0..t il <0. <o.tt cr(s/rr x.) lslr ur,)
CALIBRATION SUMMARY
Project Number:
Client:
Test Location:
Date:
Operator:
Box Truck:
Analyzer
Type, S/N,
and Span
Ca!
Level
Cylinder lD
Serial
Number
Expected
CalValue
Actual
Response
Difference
As%of
Span
Cylinder
Pressure
(psi)
Cylinder
Expiration
Date
COz Zero
Mid
High
Oz Zero
Mid
High
NO,Zero
Mid
High
SOz Zero
Low
Mid
High
Project Number:
Client:
Test Location:
Source Condition:
Test Engineer:
Duct Diameter _ ft
Flue Area
-
ft'
Port Length
Por,
-
"HgStatic_ "HzOStatic "HgPr- "Hg
Volumetric Flow Rate Determination Field Data Sheet
Date:
Test Number:
Start Time:
End Time:
Test Tech:
Upstream Disturbance, Diameters
Downstream Disturbance, Diameters
Pitot lD_ Pitot Coefficient (Cp) _
Cazo/o
OzYo
Nz%
Wet Bulb Temp
Dry Bulb Temp
B*t
Leak Checks Passed@
Pre _lnches HzO
Post _lnches HeO
Meter No. Fluke # Umbilical lD
Port-
Point #AP
Temp.
"F J^P
Null
Point
Angle,
Degrees
Port-
Point #AP
Temp.
OF J^P
Null
Point
Angle,
Degrees
Averaoe
44 x COzo/o + .32 x Ozo/o + .28x Nz% - _ (Md)
(_ Md , _1-Bws) + (18 x_Bws) = _ (Ms)
85.49 x
Vs,Flue Area x 60 =acftn
J^P :ft/sec(vs)
17.647 x
-acfrn
, Ps =
Ts "R
scfm x 60 =
IM PINGER VT'EIGHT SHEET
PLANT:
UNIT NO:
LOCATION:
DATE:
TEST NO:
METHOD:
WEIGHED/iIEASURED BY:
BALANCE ID:
Ii,PINGERS
FINAL TOTAL II{ITIAL TOTAL TOTAL IMPINGER GAIN
stLlcA
FINAL TOTAL INITIAL TOTAL TOTAL SILICA GAIN
llient:Pitot Tube Cp:
lacility:Probe Length (Feet):
fest Location:Probe Liner Material:
,roject #:Sample Plane:Hrztl. or Vert.
fest Method(s):Port Length ("):
lest Engineer:Port Diameter ("):
fest Technician:Port Type:
Jpstream Diameters:Duct Shape:Circ. or Rect.
)ownstream Diameters:Diameter (Feet):
I of Ports Sampled:Length (Feet):
I of Points per Port:Width (Feet):
iource Condition:Duct Area (Sq. Feet):
)iluent ModeUSN:Minutes per Point:
|,lid Gas I D/concentration:lv"coz %o2 Total Traverse Points:
tigh Gas ID/concentration:lotocoz %o2 Test Length (Min.):
Yloisture Balance ID:Train Type:
lsokinetic Sampling Cover Sheet
B#-
Comments:
DS-004 lsokinetic Sampling Cover Sheet Rev. 3.2
8E-B#-
Vleter ID:
Pitot lD:
Filter lD:
Filter Pre-Weight (g):
\ozzle Diameter ("):
l{eter Cal Factor (Y):
Vteter Orifice Setting (AH):
\ozzle Kit ID:
Lndividuel Nozzle ID:
Dre Pitot Leak Check:a ..H:O
D "H:O @ "HzO
)ost Pitot Leak Check:D "H:O i "H:O @ "HzO
)re Nozzle Leak Check:(0 "Hg (q) "Hg (@ "Hg
'ost Nozzle Leak Check:@ "Hg (tD "Hg @ "Hg
]arometric Pressure,"Hg:
itatic Pressure, "HzO:
lOzo/o:
)zo/o:
1t112021
os

i
ED
o
=
tr
E

o
o
E-
6
=
E
tl
.
gd
lJ
.
A
Flt
oo
lt

-:
o=
o-
6
i5
r
d
3=
6,

=o
!:
l

E=
l
l
#P
t
'
-lI
-bg
.
gE
*
-Y
iHE
*
6P
-
Es
s
=
t
ps
s
g
*
!f
i
a
E
s
9-FE
t
;3
p
t
.g
5
i
E3
=
EE
t
63
-
o-o.E
,i
to.
:
(L
O
TL
Eoo)Fe
o
.nq,F
iiooE=zo,
(,
)oLiio.c
.o=oo)F
oEoooc.o(EooJat,oF
ooElzoo,
ooso(Eoog.glrC"
.=CLE(!aooE-Y

O)
o6
g,
o
o)
-oEazoj-
i
(D
c
=
p'

.q

_E
L(
J
(
L