DAQ-2025-001532

1

DAQC-288-25
Site ID 10335 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING COMPANY

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: March 19, 2025

SUBJECT: Location: 474 West 900 North, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
Contact: Rheannon Schaefer – 801-367-8102
Tester: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Sources: Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) Wet Gas Scrubber (WGS)
FRS ID #: UT0000004903500004
AO# DAQE-AN0103350075-18 dated January 11, 2018
Subject: Review of Pretest Protocol dated March 14, 2025

On March 14, 2025, the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a protocol for testing of the Tesoro
Refining and Marketing Company’s FCCU WGS located in Salt Lake City, Utah. Testing will be
performed on May 20, 2025, to determine compliance with the emission limits found in AO Conditions
II.B.4.c and II.B.8.a

PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:

1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses: OK
2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate: OK
3. RM ALT-153 used to determine dry molecular weight of the gas stream: OK
4. RM 4 used to determine moisture content: OK
5. RM 5B used to determine PM emissions: OK

DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted.

CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: Send protocol review and test date confirmation notice.

ATTACHMENTS: Stack testing protocol.

6 3
^i\w/.
salt Lake city Refinery
474 west 900 North
salt Lake city, uT 84103-1494
Tesoro Refining &
Marketing Company LLC
A subsidiary of Marathon Petrolsum Corporation
March 14,2025
Mr. Paul Morris
Division of Air Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Tesoro Relining and Marketing Company's
Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU WGS Coke Burn Emissions Test Protocol
Fuel Gas Y-917 HzS RATA Protocol
North & South Flare HzS RATAs Protocol
Dear Mr. Morris:
Enclosed please find the Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) Wet Gas Scrubber (WGS)
Method 58 Particulate Matter Test, the Fuel Gas (V-917) HzS Relative Accuracy Test Audit
(RATA), and the North & South Flare HzS Relative Accuracy Test Audits (RATAs) Protocols
scheduled for the weeks of May 20,2025, and August 5,2025.
The purpose of the Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit Wet Gas Scrubber (WGS) Method 58
Partiiulate Matter Test is to demonstrate the compliance status of the source with respect to
NSPS Subpart Ja PM emission standard of I pound per 1000 pounds coke burn off. The PM test
results will be used to determine the new operational parameters for the WGS (differential
pressure and liquid-to-gas ratio) and the ESP (primary power and secondary current).
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
NI\/ISION OF AIR OTJALITY
Rheannon SchaefEr
r-=Aliarc
TECHNICAL GROUi-)
Site Specific Test Plan
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company
Salt Lake City Refrnery
474 West 900 North
salt Lake ciry, uT 84103
Source to be Tested: Wet Gas Scrubber
Proposed Test Date: May 20,2025
Project No. AST-2025-L 139
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Regulltory Information
Permit No.
Regulatory Citations
Source Information
DAQE-AN10335007s-18
40 CFR 60, Subpart Ja
40 CFR 63, MACT SubpartUUU
Source Name
FCCU WGS
Contact Information
Source ID
PS#4
Target Parameter
PM
Test Location
Tesoro Refining and Marketing
Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Facility Contact
Rheannon Schaefer
Rschaefer@marathonpetoleum. com
[phone]
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
WestValley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Chades Horton
charles.horton@alliancetg. com
(3s2) 663-7568
Field Team Leader
Alan Jensen
alan j [e-mail]
(84't)220-3949
(subject to change)
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
[e-mail]
(8t2) 4s2478s
Test Plan/Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
delaine. spangler@alliancetg. com
Analytical Laboratory
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
5530 Marshall Street
Arvada, CO 80002
Cory Manshack
cory.manshack@allianceTG. com
(318) ss7-9733
AST-2025-l 139 MPC - Salt Lake City, UT Page i
pur6rpe
Site Specifrc Test Plan
Table of ContentsTECIlNICAL GROUP
TABLE OFCONTENTS
l.l Process/Contol System Descriptions. .'.........'......... l-l
2.0 Summary of Test Program ..'.'............2-l
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded ................2'l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate ........ 3-l
3.2 U.S. EPA Alternative Test Method ALT-153 - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide... .....3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content........ ..... 3-l
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 58 - Particulate Matter.... ......3-2
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Conhol - U.S. EPA Reference Method ALT-I53 ......................3'2
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-l: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedu1e................... ......2'l
LIST OF APPEI\DICES
AppendixA MethodlData
Appendix B Example Field Data Sheets
AST-2025-1 139 MPC - Salt L:ke City, UT Page ii
IECIiNICAL GNCUP Site Specific Test Plan
Intruduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Marathon peholeum corporation (Mpc) to conductcompliance testing at the Tesoro Refining and Marketing company (Tesoro) Salt Lake city, utah refinery. portionsof the facility are subject to provisions of the 40 cFR 60, Subpart Ja, 40 cFR 63, subpart uuU, and the UtahDepartnent of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAO perrnit No. DAeE-AN103350075-lg.Testing will be conducted to detennine the emission rates of particulate matter @M) from the exhaust of theFluidized catalytic cracking Unit (FCCLf Belco wet Gas scrubber (wGS) Electostatic precipitator (ESp) tocomply with the <1.0 lb/1,000lbs coke burn pM emission standard.
This site-specific test plan (SSTP) has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of theUDAQ permit and the NESHAP.
1.1 Process/ControlSystemDescriptions
The FCCU Regenerator / carbon Monoxide Boiler (Heat Recovery Unit) is equipped with coNox oxygeninjection' ammonia injection, and an ESP/LoTox (wGS) system for emission controls. Emissions are exhaustedthrough one (l) stack designared as pSfi4.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table.
1.3 Safety Requirements
Testing personnel will undergo site-specific safety naining for all applicable areas upon arrival at the site. Alliancepersonnel will have current OSHA or MSHA safety training and be equipped with an HzS monitor, hard hats, safetyglasses with side shields, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fire resistant clothing, and fall protection(including shock corded lanyards and full-body hamesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves in 3 6anns1consistent with Client and Alliance,s safety policies.
A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader.
Table 1-1: Project Team
MPC Personnel Rheannon Schaefer .
Regulatory Agency
other field personnel assigned at time of testing event
AST-2025-l 139 MPC - Salt Lake City, UT
Site Specific Test Plan
Summary ofTest Programs
2.0 Summary of Test Program
To satisfy the requirements of the UDAQ permit, the facility will conduct a performance test program to determine
the compliance status of the FCCU WGS ESP.
2.1 General Description
All testing will be performed in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1,2,
Alt-153, 4,arrd 58. Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program. The
following is a summary of the test objectives.
r Testing will be performed to demonstrate compliance with the UDAQ permit.
o Emissions testing will be conducted on the exhaust of the FCCU.
o Each of the three (3) test runs will be approximately 60 minutes in duration.
o Heated portions of the sample equipment will be maintained at320 + 25oF per Method 58.
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded
Plant personnel will collect operational and parametric data at least once every l5 minutes during the testing. The
following list identifies the measurements, observations and records that will be collected during the testing
program:
o Coke Burn Off Rate, lb/tr
r Scrubber Flow Rate
o Fan Frequency
2.3 Proposed Test Schedule
Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program.
Table 2-1: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule
Testing Locetion Paremeter US EPA Method No. ofRuns Rnn Duretion Est Onsite
Time
DAYI-May19,2025
Equipment Setup & Pretest QA/QC Checks 6hr
DAY2-May20,2025
FCCU WGS
VFR l-2
3 60 min 8hr
Oz/COz Alt-153
BWS 4
PM 5B
DAY3-May21,2025
Contingency Day (if needed)
AST-2025-1 139 MPC - Salt Lake City, UT Page 2-l
put6rpe
E Sin Specifrc Test PIan
2.4 Emission Llmits
Emission limits for each pollutant are below.
Table 2-2: Emisslon Limits
FCCUWGS PM - <1.0 lb/1,000 lbs coke bum 60, Subpart Ja
2.5 Test Report
The final test report must be submitted within 30 days o116s sompletion of the performance test and will include the
following information.
o Introducrlbn - Brief discussion of project scope of work and activities.
Resul* and Discussion - A summary of test results and procesVcontrol system operational data with
comparison to regulatory requirements or vendor guarantees along with a description of process conditions
and/or testing deviations that may have affected the testing results.
Methodologt - A description of the sampling and analytical methodologies.
Sample Calcalations - Example calculations for each target parameter.
Field Data - copies of actual handwritten or electronic field data sheets.
Laboratory Dara - Copies oflaboratory report(s) and chain ofcustody(s).
Quality Control Data - Copies of all instnrment calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates.
Process Operating/Control System Data - Process operating and contol system data (as provided by MpC)
to support the test results.
MPC- Saltta&c City, UT
Site Specific Test Plan
Testing Methodologt
3.0 Testing Methodology
This section provides a description of the sampling and analytical procedures for each test method that will be
employed during the test program. All equipment, procedures and quality assurance measures necessary for the
completion of the test program meet or exceed the specifications of each relevant test method. The emission testing
program will be conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology
All stack diameters, depths, widths, upstream and downstream disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be
measured on site with a verification measurement provided by the Field Team Leader.
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points will be selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method L To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances will be equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure l-l in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method
l.
Full velociry traverses will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system will consist of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature will be measured with a K-
fype thermocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings will be recorded during each test run. The data collected will
be utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Alternative Test Method ALT-153 - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (Oz) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Alternative Test
Method ALT-153. One (l) integrated Tedlar bag sample will be collected during each test run. The bag samples
will be analyzed on site with a gas analyzer. The remaining stack gas constituent will be assumed to be nitrogen for
the stack gas molecular weight determination. The quality control measlues are described in Section 3.5.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content will be determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train will consist of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger will be filled with a
known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger will be analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run
on the same analytical balance to deterrnine the amount of moisture condensed.
Prrameter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Volumetric Flow Rate t&2 Full Velocity Traverses
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide Alt-153 lntegrated Bag / Inskumental Analysis
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Particulate Matter 5B Isokinetic Sampling
AST-2025-1 139 MPC - Salt Lake City, UT Page 3-l
E t-1 L R
pul6rpe
Site Specific Test Plan
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 5B - particulate Matter
The filterable particulate matter (PM) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.s. EpA Reference Test
Method 58. The complete sampling system will consist of a stainless steel nozzle, heated stainless steel-lined
probe, oven-dried at 160 +5 "C (320 +10 "F) and pre-weighed heated quare filter, gas conditioning train, pump and
calibrated dry gas meter. The gas conditioning hain will consist of fow (4) chilled impingers - the fnst and second
containing 100 mL of HzO, an empty third impinger and the fourth containing 200-300 grams of silica gel. The
probe liner and filter heating systems will be maintained at a temperature of 160 + l4.C (320 +25"F) and the
impinger temperature will be maintained at20C (68"F) or less throughout the testing.
Following the completion of each test run, the sampling rain will be leak checked at a vacuum pressure greater than
or equal to the highest vacuum pressure observed during the run, and the contents of the impingers will be measured
for moisture gain. The probe and rrozzle will be rinsed and brushed six (6) times with acetone to remove any
adhering particulate matter. This rinse will be recovered in container 2. T\e front half of the filter holder will be
rinsed tbree (3) times with acetone and this rinse will be added to container 2. The pre-weighed quartz filter will be
carefully removed and placed in container l. All containers will be sealed, labeled and liquid levels marked for
transport to the analytical laboratory.
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quatity controt - u.S. EpA Reference Method ALT-153
Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol I (+/- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates
will be found in ttre Quality Assurance/Quality Contol Appendix of the final test report.
Low-Level gas will be collected in a Tedlar bag and introduced to the instrument. After adjusting the analyzer to the
Low-Level gas concentation and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will be recorded. This
process will be repeated for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level
calibration gases will be sequentially collected in a Tedlar bag and introduced to the instrument. All values are to be
within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concenhation) will be collected in a Tedlar bag and
inEoduced to the instrument and the time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or g.Syo(whichever
was less restrictive) of the gas concenkation will be recorded. The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches
a stable value as defined in ALT-153 Section 4.5, and this value will be recorded. Next, Low-Level gas will be
collected in a Tedlar bag and infroduced to the instrument and the time required for the analyzer read.ing to decrease
to a value within 5.0 percent ot 0.5%o (whichever was less restrictive) will be recorded. If the Low-Level gas is zero
gas, the response must meet 0.5Yoor 5.0 percentof the upscale gas concentration (whicheverwas less restrictive).
The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value as defined in ALT-153 Section 4.5, and this
value will be recorded. The initial system bias will be deterrnined from these data. The System Bias must be within
5.0 percent of the Calibration Span.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) will be collected in a Tedlar bag and
introduced to the instrument. After the analyzer response is stable, the value will be recorded. Next, Low Level gas
will be collected in a Tedlar bag and introduced to the instnrment, and the analyzer value recorded once it reaches a
stable response. The System Bias must be within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5Yo absolute difference or
the data will be invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and System Bias will be repeated.
AST-2025-l 139 MPC - Salt Lake City, UT PageS-2
pilldrrcE)
T E C I] N IC A L G R O U P
Site Specific Test Plan
Testing Methodolow
Drift between pre- and post-nrn System Bias will be within 3 percent of the Calibration Span. If the drift exceeds 3
percent, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias will be repeated.
After instrument calibration, each sample bag will be introduced to the appropriate arnlyzer acsspding to the
procedures in ALT-153 Section 4.1. The analysis will be continued until the following criteria is met, at which point
the concentrations will be recorded:
%coz
o Differ by no more than 0.3% when CO2 is greater than 4 .0o/o, or,
o Differ by no more than0.2% when CO2 is less than 4.0%.
%o2
. Differ by no more than 0.3% when 02 is less than 15.0o/o, or,
o Differ by no more thano.2% when 02 is greater than 15.0%.
At the completion of testing, the data will be saved to the Alliance server. AII data will be reviewed by the Field
Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and elechonic data will be
relinquished to the report coordinator and ttren a final review will be perforrred by the Project Manager.
MPC - Salt Lake City, UT
pur6noe
TECI]NICAL GROtTP
4.0 Quality Assurance Program
Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Management Plan to ensure the
continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and
procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme.
Adherence to prescribed procedwes is quite often the most applicable ec check.
4.1 Equipment
Field test equipment is assigped a unique, permanent identification number. Prior to mobilizing for the test
program, equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipment problems prior to aniving on site. This
minimizes lost time on the job site due to equipment failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is
unavoidable despite the most rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures. Therefore, replacements for critical
equipment or components are brought to the job site. Equipment returning from the field is inspected before it is
returned to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and
recalibrated where necessary.
Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequancy, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. The
calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA-600/R-94i038c, September 1994) are utilized.
When these methods are inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recognized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked
for completeness and accuracy. Copies of calibration forms are included in the report.
The following sections elaborate on the calibration procedwes followed by Alliance for these items of equipment.
o Dry Gas Meter and Orifice. A full meter calibration using critical orifices as the calibration standard is
conducted at least semi-annually, more frequently if required. The meter calibration procedure determines
the meter conection factor (Y) and the meter's orifice pressure differential (AH@). Alliance uses approved
Altemative Method 009 as a post-test calibration check to ensure that the correction factor has not changed
more than 5% since the last full meter calibration. This check is performed after each test series.o Pitot Tubes and Manometers. Type-S pitot tubes tlat meet the geometric criteria required by U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.84 unless a specific coefficient has been
determined from a wind tunnel calibration. If a specific coefficient from a wind hrnnel calibration has been
obtained that coefficient will be used in lieu of 0.84. Standard pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria
required by U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.99. Any pitot tubes not
meeting the appropriate geometric criteria are discarded and replaced. Manometers are verified to be level
and zeroed prior to each test run and do not require further calibration.
o Temperature Measuring Devices. All thermocouple sensors mounted in Dry Gas Meter Consoles are
calibrated semi-annually with a NlST-traceable thermocouple calibrator (temperature simulator) and
verified during field use using a second NlST-haceable meter. NlST-traceable thermocouple calibrators
are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory.
o Nozzles. Nozzles are measured three (3) times prior to initiating sampling with a caliper. The maximum
difference between any two (2) dimensions is 0.004 in.
r Digital Calipers. Calipers are calibrated annually by Alliance by using gage blocks that are calibrated
annually by an outside laboratory.
AST-2025-l 139 MPC - Salt l^ake City, UT Page 4-l
pill6rrcGr
TECHNICAL GROUP Site Specific Test Plan
Suality Asflrance Ptogram
4.2
Barometer. The barometric pressure is obtained from a nationally recognized agency or a calibrated
barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field trip against a mercury barometer. The
barometer is acceptable if the values agree within + 2 percent absolute. Barometers not meeting this
requirement are adjusted or taken out of service.
Balances and Weights. Balances are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory. A functional check is
conducted on the balance each day it is use in the field using a calibration weight. Weights are re-certified
every two (2) years by an outside laboratory or internally. If conducted intemally, they are weighed on a
MST traceable balance. If the weight does not meet the expected criteria, they are replaced.
Other Equipment. A mass flow controller calibration is conducted on each Environics system annually
following the procedures in the Manufacturer's Operation manual. Other equipment such as probes,
umbilical lines, cold boxes, etc. are routinely maintained and inspected to ensrue that they are in good
working order. They are repaired or replaced as needed.
Field Sampling
Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test
method(s). General QC measures for the test program include:
e Cleaned glassware and sample train components will be sealed until assembly.
o Sample trains will be leak checked before and after each test run.
. Appropriate probe, filter and impinger temperatures will be maintained.
o The sampling port will be sealed to prevent air from leaking from the port.
. Dry gas meter, AP, AH, temperature and pump vacuum data will be recorded during each sample point.
o An isokinetic sampling rate of 90-110% will be maintained, as applicable.
o All raw data will be maintained in organized manner.
o All raw data will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability.
4.3 Analytical Laboratory
Analytical laboratory selection for sample analyses is based on the capabilities, certifications and accreditations that
the laboratory possesses. An approved analyical laboratory subcontractor list is maintained with a copy of the
certificate and analyte list as evidence of compliance. Alliance assumes responsibility to the client for the
subcontractor's work. Alliance maintains a verifiable copy of the results with chain of custody documentation.
AST-2025-l 139 MPC - Sdt L^ake City, UT Page4-2
pultfure Method I Data
Lsdo! MFC-Tryo - S.lt Lltc CltY
SoEr@ FCCU Wd Gu S.Ebb.r
Dki Orlotrdor:
Ducr D.dt!:
Irln$c. froE Fr Wdl to Oltdd. ot Port!
Nlppl.Id6r:
D.Dtt of Duct:
Ctu Scdond Arcr ol Duct:
No. of Tit Port:
IHrt !e A:
Dlrt lcc A Irud DlrD&E:
IrLLlc Bl
Dbtuc. B Iruct lrluctrn:
MhlDuE NlDb.r of Tnvcre Pohttl
Actod Nmbcr of Tnv.m Pohtti
NE6b.r ofR6dh8t p.r Poltrt:
Cicu.lrt
105.00 t!
9.0{ lr
50.21,
35.0
4.4
2.5
21
h
fr'
ft
(autt bc > 0.,
It
(Durt bc > 2)
24
I
crncrll.aR ltt cT ,
f I - I ---la7a0
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Nttba ol mc pob.a ot . ai6&
I
3
a
5
6
7
I,
l0
ll
t2
I a 5 7 9l0ll1,
t4.6
t5.4
6.1
25.0
75.0
,1'
4.1
t4.6
29.6
10.4
t5.4
'1u
3.2
10.5
19.4
32.3
61.1
t0.6
89.5
,:t
2.6
t.2
14.5
22.6
34.2
65.8
17.4
85.,1
9r.E
t_n
2.t
6.7
I r.t
t1.7
25.0
35.6
u.4
1S.O
82.3
tt.2
93.1
91.9
.Pacdt of sruh diaddcr troil i6idc wll to t@qr. poirt
Travcre
Poht
Y. oI Dlrtrlcc uuulca
lloE
IlLDctcr r.ll outtldc ol
I
3
a
5
5
7
t
I
l0
ll
t2
2.t
6.1
I l.t
t7.1
25.0
35.5
64.4
75.0
82.3
tt.2
93.3
91.9
2.02
6.43
I 1.33
16.99
2,t.00
34.1t
61.t2
12.0O
79.01
u.67
89.57
93.98
I 1.02
15.,13
20.71
25.99
11.00
43. lE
70.t2
81.00
E8.01
9r.67
9t.57
102.98
.HagEbtrbbRdq!tsSt6dM
Sbck Di.gm
A=15ft"
B=20ft.
Dcp6 of Duct = 96 itr.
Crcs! Scdiond Arca Downltraam
olsturbanca
a
a
a
a
a
a
aoo o a a o aaa
a
a
a
o
a
Upltruam
Olrturt.nc.
Emission Calculations
Locetion -
Source -
Project No. -
Parameter -
Run Number Run I Run2 Run 3 Average
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
Run Time. min 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0
VELOCITY IIEAD, in. WC
Point I
Point 2
Point 3
Point 4
Point 5
Point 6
Point 7
Point 8
Point 9
Point l0
Point 1l
Point 12
Point l3
Point 14
Point 15
Point 16
Point 17
Point 18
Point 19
Point 20
Point 2l
Point22
Point 23
Point 24
CALCTJLATED DATA
Square Root of AP, (in. WC)"'
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Static Pressure, in. WC
Stack Pressure, in. Hg
Stack Cross-sectional Area, ft2
Temperature, oF
Temperature, oR
Moisture Fraction Measured
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation
Moisture Fraction
02 Concentration,Yo
CO2 Concentration,o/o
Molecular Weight, lbflb-mole (dry)
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet)
Velocitv. ff/sec
(^P)
(cp)
(Pb)
(Pe)
(P0
(As)
(Ts)
(Ts)
(BWSmsd)
(BWSsat)
(Bws)(o,
(co,
(Md)
Ms)
(Vs)
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
ltt Stack Conditions, acfrn
A,t Standard Conditions, dscfrn
(Qa)
(Qs)
Cyclonic FIow Check
Location -
Source -
ProJect No. -
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
l3
14
15
16
t7
t8
19
20
2t
22
23
24
Method 4 Data
Location -
Source -
Project No. -
Parameter -
Anelysis Gravimetric
Run I Date:
Impinger No.I 2 3 4 Total
Contents H20 H20 Empty Silica
Initiel Mass, g
Final Mass, g
Gain
Run 2 Date:
Impinger No.I 2 3 4 Total
Contents t12o H2o]Empty Silica
Initial Mass, g
Final Mass, g
Gain
Run 3 Date:
Impinger No.I 2 3 4 Total
Contents H2o H2o]EmpU Silica
Initiel Mass, g
Final Mass, g
Gain
Isokinetic Field Data
rEa rJ'64.
SrrylcTlm
(Elruhr)
Dry Grt Mctlr
Rcedlog
(f6
Pltot
Tubc
AP
(t! wC)
Gu TclE.riiur.r ,oEl Orlllcc Prcrr.
AE
(tuLWC)
Pury
Vrc(l[Hs)
It Tc&ntur..
% ISO Vt
(rp0
IIGM Aycrrpc StrcL Probo Flltcr Im Ent Aut
ADb.AEb.Arb.AEb.Beclr Eud Ideel Actud0"00 #Drv/o
#Dw/O!#Dry/o!
#Drv/o!#Drvio!
#DMo!fDI.. 0
#Dry/o!#DMO!
#DMO!#Dw/01
#DMO!#DMO!
#DMo!#Dw/o!
#Drv/o!#Dry/o!
#DMO!flDrv/o
#DMo!#Dw/o!
#Dry/o!#Dryio!
#DIV/O!#Drv/o1
#Drv/o!#Drv/o
#Drv/o!#Dw/O
#Drv/o!#Drv/o!
#DMO![Dw/o!
#Dw/o!fDM0
#DMO!#Drv/o!
#Drv/o!#Dw/o1
#DMO!flDMOI
#Dw/o!#DM0!
#DWio!#Dw/O!
#Drv/o!HDry/O!
Flnrl DGM:
Mohtur.:
BeromHc:
Strtlc Pr6t:
StrcL Pr6r:
CQ:
or:
N/CO:
Md:
Mr:
- in.Hg
- in. WC
- in.Hg
_ o/o
-%
-%
- lMb..mlc
- lMumlc
ErL Tm: .F
Elt Tr: - .F
Ert AP: - in. WC
Ert Dn: - in.
Pb: - in. Hg
Pg: - in. WCa*-y"
COr: - ./o
Mrd I (o
Mld 2 (cf)
T: MU AHYlc
QA/QC Data
Lmrdotr -
Sioon. -
Prclet No. -
Prmctar -
Drtc Nozic ID
Nozdr IX.nGtcr (lL)
{l *, *3 Dtr JAvcrr.I DllLr.ne Crli.rh Mrt rld
S 0.004 i!.
D.t Pltot II)Evldcrc of EvldcDc of CrXbndo! or
na.l'Htrlhrl
Drt.Prcbc or
Thmcooolc ID
f,.cfcrclc hdlotcd I!,lfwEe Crttcrh Prbc lrlgth
* 1.5 % (.bslutc)
Flcld Bdrncc Chck
Drtc
Bdse ID
T6t wci8ht ID
Ccrtificd Wcight (g)
McNurcd Wcight (g)
wcigbt Di6mrcc (g)
Drt.Evld.trc. of
dmcc?R.odhg Vcrt[cd Crlbndon or
PnrlrrmnH BroEct r ID
Drt.Mctcr Bor II)P6ltlv. Pru[rc Lcrk CLet
Pus
RqSc!l Lot#Flcld Prcp pcrfomcd Flcld Lot D.tc By
Pdtldt
REB 2 R[n 3
Row R!t! nDE):Flow Rrtr 0D0):FIN Rrb ,llm\:
ClekTimc Tmmurrc CletTimc Tmmbe Clmk Ti6.
Mdlod 5 Rlm !
Rtrn Rnn 2 Rrn 3
Actmc (ml)Aeh. (mll {nl)
Appendix ri
Example Calculations
Locatlon: -
Source: -
ProJect No.: -
Run No.: 1
Parameter: -
Meter Pressure @m), ln. Hg
AHPm = Pb+136
where,
Pb -- = barometric prcssurc, in. Hg
AH
Pm
Absolute Strck Ges Pressure @s), ln. Hg
= prcssurc differential oforifice, in H2O
= in. HE
Tm
= metcr correction factor
= mcter volumc, cf
= absolute metcr pressure, in. Hg
= absolute mctct tcmpcranuc, \'
= dscf
ps = pb+#
where,
Pb
Pg
Ps
Standerd Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf
- = baromctric pressurc, in. Hg
= static pressurc, in. H2O
= in. HC
77.636xYxVmxPmVmstd =
where,
Y
Vm
Pm
Tm
Vmstd
BWSsat =
where,
Ts
ps
BWSsat
= stack temperaturc, oF
= absolute stack gas pressurc, in. Hg
0.000
Standrrd Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf
Vwstd = 0.047L6 x Mc
where,
Mc - = volume of HrO collectcd, ml
v*rtdT=.cf
Moisture Fncdon @WSset), dimenrlonless (theoredcrl rt nturated condldons)
1063?-(*f3:5)
.3=dimensionless
Moisture Frrcdon @WS), dimenslonleso (meesured)
Vwstd
BWS
where,(Vwstd * Vmstd)
Vwstd - = standard wet volumc, scf
Vmstd
BWS
= standard metcr volume, dscf
= dimensionlcss
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Locgtion: -
Source: -
Project No.: -
Run No.: I
Peremeter: -
Mobture Frrcdon @WS), dlmenslonlesl
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat ( BWSmsd
where,
Moleculer Weight (DRY) (Md), lb/lb-mole
Md = (0.44 x o/oCO2) + (0.32 x o/oO2) + (0.28(100- o/oCO2 - 0/oO2))
where,
= carbon dioxide conccntratior, 7o
= oxygcn concentration, 7o
= lbilb mol
Moleculer Welght (WET) (Ms), lbflb-mole
BWSsat
BWSmsd
BWS
Ms = Md (1 - BWS)
where,
Md
BWS
Ms
Averrge Veloclty (Vr), fUsec
= moishuc fraction (theorctical at saturated conditions)
= moisture fraction (mcasurcd)
+ 18.01s (BWS)
= molccular wcight (DRY), lbAb mol
= moisturc fraction, dimensionless
= lb/lb mol
x Cp x (LVttzlavg x
= pitot tube coefficient
= vclocity head ofstack gas, (in. H2O)rn
= absolute stack temperature, oR
= absolutc stack gas pressurc, in. Hg
= molccular weight of stack gas, lb/lb mol
= fl/scc
= stack gas velocity, ff/sec
= cross-scctional area ofstack, #
= actn
= moistue fractio& dimcnsionless
= absolute stack gas pressurc, in. Hg
= absolute stack temperatuc, oR
= dscfn
Cou
02
Md
Vs=
where,
85.49
Cp
A PIN
Ts
Ps
Ms
Vs
Vs
As
Qa
Averege Steck Gri trlow rt Strck Condidons (Qe), ecfm
Qa = 60x Vs x As
where,
Avenge Steck Ges Flow et Strnderd Condidons (Qr), drcfm
Ps
Qs = 17.635 x Qa x (1 - BWS), f,
where,
Qa
BWS
Ps
Ts
Qs
- = avcrage stack gas flow at stack cooditions, acfin
PsxMs
Appendix A
Example Calculetions
Location: -
Source: -
ProJect No.: -
Run No.: I
Parameter: -
0.0319xTmx29
Dry Gs Meter Cdibrrdon Check (Yqe), dimersionless
Yqa =
where,
x 100
Y
o
Vm
&t@
Pb
AH avg
Md(oD'":
= mcter corrcction factor, dimensionless
= run time, min.
= total mcter vohune, dcf
= sbsolute stack tempcraturc, oR
= absolute stack gas pressurc, in. Hg
= volume of H2O collected, ml
= mcter volume, cf
= absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
= mctcr correction factor, unitless
= absolute meter tempcrature, T'
= volumc ofnozzle, ft3
:
60
0
Tm absolute meter ternPerature, "R: orifice meter calibration cocfficiant, in. H2O
= baromctric pressure, in. Hg
= avcrage pressure differentid oforifice, in H2O
= molccular weight (DRY), lbAb mol
= average squareroot pressure differcntial oforifice, (itr. tI2O)t'
= pcrccntYqa
Volume of Nozzle (Vn), fC
wberc,
Ts
Ps
Mc
Vm
Pm
Y
Tm
Vn
kokinetic Srmpling Retc (I),7.
Vn
Tsvn =F;(o.oozeos x vtc *Vm xPmxYr
-l
Tm)
:
60.0
0.000
I:()"roo0x60xAnxYs
where,
Vn
0
Ar
Vs
I
= nozzle volume, ft3
= run time, mi[utes
= area ofnozzle, ft2
= avcrage velocity, ff/sec
rrareAI
TECHNICAL GROUP
Site Specific Test Plan
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Sources to be Tested: Fuel Gas Y-9l7,North & South
Flares
Proposed Test Dates: August 5 - 7,2025
Proj ect No. AST- 2025 - t L 42
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, LIf 84120
L-l ,1i.i r)Ff)Atl lrlFlll OF
t jvlL,J l\.1Vr:NTAL Q t JA LITYI
14il
Hr,rrr.( lx-, [i rfr riz{ [
, '/i :llC,ll OF Alll Ot!ALITY
Site Specific Test Plan
Test Program Summary
Resulatory Information
Permit No.
Regulatory Citations
Source Information
DAQE-ANl033s007s-18
40 CFR 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 7
40 CFR 60, Subpart Ja
Source Natne
Y-917 Fuel Gas Line
North Flare
South Flare
Contact Information
Target Parameter
HzS
HzS
HzS
Test Location
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Facility Contact
Rheannon Schaefer
Rschaefer@marathonpetoleum. com
(801) 367-8r02
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 22705, Suite E
WestValley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
charles.horton@lliancetg. com
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Alan Jensen
alan [e-mail]
(2s6)221-94s7
(subject to change)
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
[e-mail]
(8t2) 4s2478s
Test Plan/Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
delaine. [e-mail]
AST-2025-l 142 MPC - Salt Lake City, UT Page i
pul6lpe
TECI-] NICAL GROUP Site Specilc Test Plan
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.0 Summary of Test Program .................2-l
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded ................ 2-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method I I - Hydrogen Sulfide...... ..... 3-1
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-l: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedu1e................... ......2-l
Table2-2: RelativeAccuracyRequirementsandLimits... ........................2-2
LIST OF APPEIIDICES
Appendix A Example Field Data Sheets
MPC - Salt L,akc City, UTAST-2025-1 142
pul6lpe
TECI]NICi\L GNOUF)
Site Specific Test Plan
Intrcduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Altiance) was retained by Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) to conduct
performance specification (PS) testing at the Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company (Tesoro) Salt Lake City,
Utah refinery. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of the 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, PS 7, 40 CFR 60,
Subpart Ja and the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Pennit No. DAQE-
AN103350075-18. Testing will include conducting a relative accuracy test audit (RATA) to determine the relative
accgracy (RA) of the hydrogen sulfide (HzS) continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) serving the North
and South Flares and the V-917 Fuel Gas Drum.
This site-specific test plan (SSTP) has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of the
UDAQ permit.
1.1 CEMS Descriptions
Parameter:
Make:
Model:
Serial No.:
Span:
North Flare
Pollutant
HzS
Siemens
Maxum II TCD
30048895441610
0-300 ppm
South Flare
Pollutant
HzS
Siemens
Maxum II TCD
30048895441060
0-300 ppm
Fuel Gas Drum
Pollutant
HzS
Siemens
Maxum II TCD
300488s3581060
0-300 ppm
1.2 Project Team
Personnel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table'
Table l-1: ProjectTeam
1.3 Sefety Requirements
Testing personnel will undergo site-specific safety training for all applicable areas upon arrival at the site. Alliance
personnel will have current OSHA or MSHA safety haining and be equipped with an HzS monitor, hard hats, safety
glasses with side shields, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fire resistant clothing, and fall protection
(including shock corded lanyards and full-body harnesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves i1 3 6anns1
consistent with Client and Alliance's safety policies.
A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader.
MPC Personnel Rheannon Schaefer
Regulatory Agency UDAQ
Alliance Personnel Alan Jensen
other field personnel assigned at time of testing event
AST-2025-l 142 MPC - Salt Lake City, UT Page l-1
AI Site Specific Test Plan
Summary ofTest Programs
2.0 Summary of Test Program
To satisff the requirements of the UDAQ permit, the facility will conduct a performance test program to determine
the compliance status of the Fuel Gas Drum, and the North and South Flare CEMS.
2.1 General Description
All testing will be performed in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method ll.
Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program. The following is a summary
ofthe test objectives.
Testing will be performed to demonstrate compliance with the UDAQ permit and 40 CFR 60, Appendix B,
PS 7 and Subpart Ja.
Emissions testing will be conducted on the exhausts of the V-917 Fuel Gas Drum and the North and South
Flares.
Testing will be conducted while each source is operating at greater than 50% of the maximum normal load.
Each of the 9-12 test runs will be approximately 3O-minutes in duration for each source.
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded
Plant personnel will collect operational and parametric data at least once every l5 minutes during the testing. The
following list identifies the measurements, observations and records that will be collected during the testing
program:
o CEMS Data
2.3 Proposed Test Schedule
Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program
Table 2-l: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule
Fla
a
a
Testing Locetion Paremeter US EPA Method No. ofRuns Run Duration EsL Onsite
Time
DAY I -August 4,2025
Equipment Setup & Pretest QA/QC Checks 6hr
DAY2-August 5,2025
North Flare HzS 1l 9-12 30 min l0-12 hr
DAY3-August6,2025
South Flare HzS u 9-t2 30 min l0-12 hr
DAY4-August7,2025
Fuel Gas Line V-917 H:S 1l 9-t2 30 min 8hr
DAY5-August8,2025
Contingency Day (if needed)
MPC - Salt Lake City, UT
Siu Specffrc Test Plan
Sumtury of Tes Prcgrams
2.4 Emission I.lmlts
Emission limig for each pollutant are below.
Teble 2-2: Relative Accurecy Requlrements and Llmits
60, Appendix B, PS 7
and Subpart Ja162 ppmvd (3 hr average)520% of RM or < l0% of AS
60, Appendix B, PS 7162 ppmvd (3 hr average)-20 % of RM or <10 % of ASFuel Gas
Line V-917
2.5 Test Report
The final test report must be submitted within 60 days of the completion of the performance test and will include the
following information.
o Introductzbz - Brief discussion of project scope of work and activities.
o Results and Discussion - A summary of test results and process/contol system operational data with
comparison to regulatory requirements or vendor guarantees along with a description of process conditions
and/or testing deviations that may have affected the testing rezults.
o Methodolog - Adescription of the sampling and analytical methodologies.
. Sample Calcalatiotts - Example calculations for each talget parameter.
o Field Data - Copies of actual handwritten or electonic field data sheets.
t euatity Control Data- Copies of all instnrment calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates.
. process Operating/Control System Data -Process operating and contol system data (as provided by MPC)
to support the test results.
AST-2025-1142 MPC - Salt Lakc City, UT Page2-2
AI Site Specific Test Plan
Testing Methodology
3.0 Testing Methodology
This section provides a description of the sampling and analytical procedures for each test method that will be
employed during the test program. All equipment, procedures and quality assurance measrues necessary for the
completion of the test program meet or exceed the specifications of each relevant test method. The emission testing
program will be conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology
All stack diameters, depths, widths, upstream and downstream disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be
measured on site with a verification measurement provided by the Field Team Leader.
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 1l - Hydrogen Sulfide
The hydrogen sulfide (HzS) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method I l. The
complete sampling system will consist of a Teflon probe, five (5) midget impingers, dry gas meter, and pump. The
first impinger will contain 15 mL of hydrogen peroxide (HrOz), the second impinger will be empty and the third,
fourth and fifth impingers will contain 15 mL of cadmium sulfate (CdSOr). Before and after each test run, the
sampling system will be leak checked.
Following each test run, the sampling train will be connected to a charcoal tube and the system will be purged with
ambient air for l5 minutes to ensure that all HzS is removed from the HzOz The contents of the first impinger will
be discarded. An acidified iodine (I2) solution will be added to each impinger and these contents will be transferred
to an iodine flask. The sample analysis will be performed onsite by titrating the sample with 0.01 N sodium
thiosulfate until the solution turned a light yellow color. At this point four (4) mL of starch indicator solution will
be added to the sample and will be repeated until the sample retumed to a colorless state. The titrant volumes for the
endpoints will be recorded and used in the emission calculations.
The relative accruacy of the HzS CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Performance
Specif,rcation 7
F
TA
Paremeter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Itemarks
Hydrogen Sulfide ll Constant Rate Sampling
AST-2025-1 142 MPC - Salt Lake City, UT Page 3-1
pilt6rpe
TICIlI.JICAL (]NOUP
4.0 QualitY Assurance Program
Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality contol Management Plan to ensure the
continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and
procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme'
Adherence to prescribed procedures is quite ofte'n the most applicable QC check.
4.1 Equipment
Field test equipment is assiped a unique, permanent identification number. Prior to mobilizing for the test
progpm, equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipment problems prior to aniving on site' This
minimizes lost time on the job site due to equipment failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is
unavoidable despite the most rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures. Therefore, replacements for critical
equipment or components are brought to the job site. Equipment returning from the field is inspected before it is
returned to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and
recalibrated where necessary.
Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications' The
calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA-600iR-94/038c, September 1994) are utilized'
when these methods are inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recognized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked
for completeness and accuracy. Copies of calibration forms are included in the report'
The following sections elaborate on the calibration procedures followed by Alliance for these items of equipment'
o Barometer. The barometric pressure is obtained from a nationally recogpized agency or a calibrated
barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field trip against a mercury barometer' The
barometer is acceptable if the values agree within * 2 percent absolute. Barometers not meeting this
requirement are adjusted or taken out of service'
o Other Equipment. A mass flow contoller calibration is conducted on each Environics system annually
following the procedures in the Manufacturer's Operation manual. Other equipment such as probes,
umbilical lines, cold boxes, etc. are routinely maintained and inspected to ensure that they are in good
working order. They are repaired or replaced as needed'
4.2 Field SamPling
Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test
method(s). General QC measures for the test program include:
o The sampling port will be sealed to prevent air from leaking from the port.
o All raw data will be maintained in an organized manner'
. All raw data will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability.
AST-2025-1r42 MPC - Salt L,ake CitY, UT Page 4-1
H2S Summary
Location: -
Source: -
Project No.: -
Run
No.Dste
Time Reference Method
H2S
ppmvd
CEMS
H2S
ppmvd
Averrge
Difference
ppmvdStertEnd
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
l2
Average
Standard Deviation (Sd)
Applicable Source Standard (AS)162
Confidence Coeflicient (CC)
Relative Accuracy @A)
Acceptability Criteria - Mean Reference Method 320Vo
Performance Specification Methoc PS 7 (RM ls)
Conlidence Coeflicient, CC
CC=
where,
h.qzs
n
sd
CC
mean difference
b.czs
n
Sd
RM
RA
#.rrl
#N/A
Relative Accuracy, RA
* ='-*;;x[*'''1.,,.
where,
= degrees offreedom
= number of runs selected for calculating the RA
= standard deviation ofdifference
= confidence coefficient
= average difference of Reference Method and CEMS
: degrees offreedom: number of runs selected for calculating the RA
= standard deviation ofdifference
= reference method
= relative accuracy
#N/A
9F
gEa6
IIeEacIU
HO
0zoo!r
co6
6!
ta€lau,xcEA9AEHH
aotQ
Run 1 Data
Perameter Irrs
Uncorrected Run Average (C*J
Corrected Run Averege (Corr)
QA/QC
Locrdon: -
Sourcc: --
Prolect No.: -
Devlce GC-FPD
Meke
Model
SAl
Compound Bottle ID Concentration Mol.hvt.
H2S 34.08
Cat QA
LoadoD -Socc. -
PreJGctNc -Ddc:
TID:
E2S EtLlndcrubndoDstrilhd cm(ppu)Mtdlfldcdtbrdost Ddrd cmGnu)If,Id.l Cdlbndon st0drd cole Gpr)
Iai.dior xr AC Yoiatia XT tc Ydrlatior RT AC YEId ton
Mu
Recovery-Drift QA
Locetion: --
Source: --
Project No.: --
GC Drift (Using H2S Gas)
Pre-Test Post-Test
Datr Dett
Timr Timr
Injection #Measured Concentration (ppm)94 Yaiation Measured Concenhation (ppm)% Variation %Dnfr
I
2
3
Mean
Pre Test System Recovery (Using HrS Gas)
Datt
Timr
Iniection #Measured Concentration (ppm)ok Yaiation Gas Concentration 7o Recoverv
1
2
3
Mean
Post Test System Recovery (Using HrS Gas)
Detr
Time
Iniection #Measured Concentration (oom)'l Yaiation Gas Concentration o/o Recoverv
I
2
3
Mean
Correction Factor I -
Example Calculations
Corrected Concentration, PPmvd
Crrs = Coo xRF
where,
Coas
RF
Cnzs
: average H2S concentration observed during test, ppmvd
: system recovery correction factor, unitless
: average H2S concentation during test, ppmvd