DAQ-2025-001519

1
DAQC-279-25
Site ID 10121 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – HILL AIR FORCE BASE – Boilers #1 and #2

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: March 14, 2025

SUBJECT: Location: Hill Air Force Base, Davis County, Utah
Contact: Dr. Erik Dettenmaier – 801-777-0888
Tester: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Source: Boilers #1 and #2
FRS ID#: UT0000004901100007
AO# DAQE-AN101210290-24 dated February 8, 2024
Action Code: 3A
Subject: Review of Stack Test Report Received March 11, 2025
On March 11, 2025, the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a test report for the Hill Air Force
Base Boilers #1 and #2 located in Davis County, Utah. Testing was performed on January 14 and 15,
2025, to demonstrate compliance with the NOX and CO emission limits found in Approval Order
Condition II.B.2.a. The DAQ-calculated test results are:

Source Test Date RM/Pollutant DAQ Result Test Result Limit
Boiler #1 1/14/2025 7E/NOX 0.45 lb/hr 0.45 lb/hr 0.65 lb/hr
8.37 ppm 8.37 ppm 9 ppm

10/CO 0.00 lb/hr 0.00 lb/hr 2.18 lb/hr

Boiler #2 1/15/2025 7E/NOX 0.35 lb/hr 0.35 lb/hr 0.65 lb/hr
6.88 ppm 6.90 ppm 9 ppm

10/CO 0.009 lb/hr 0.009 lb/hr 2.18 lb/hr

DEVIATIONS: None noted.

CONCLUSION: The stack emissions test reports appear to be acceptable

RECOMMENDATION: The NOX and CO emissions should be considered to have been in
compliance with the applicable limits at the time of testing. No further action
is necessary.

HPV: No

ATTACHMENTS: Stack test report received March 11, 2025
DAQ generated excel spreadsheets

6 3
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 75TH AIR BASE WING GFMC)
HILL AIR FORCE BASE UTAH
Colonel Daniel L. Cornelius, USAF
Installation Commander
7981 Georgia Street
Hill AFB UT 84056-5824
Director
Utah Division of Air Quality
Attention: Compliance Section
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake city UT 84114-4820
Dear Director
lb AwLLr
Pursuant to Title V Operating Permit I100007004, II.B.33.c, performance testing of
boilers located in building 1286 was performed on l4 January - l5 January 2025. Boiler #l and
Boiler # 2 in building 1286, model number CW-NB-200D-45-250-AL-RH and serial numbers
100054 and 100058, were source tested in accordance with the requirements of Title 40 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 60, Appendix A, Methods I , 2, 3, 4,78 , l0 and 19.
The results from the test indicate that all boilers emission source tested are in compliance
with the emission limits in Boiler Approval Order DAQE-ANl0l2l0290-24 provision II.B.2.a.
The emission rate limits are 0.65 pounds per hour (lb/hr) and 9 parts per million (ppm) for oxides
of nitrogen and 2.18 lb/hr for carbon monoxide.
In accordance with Operating Permit provision I.K and Utah Administrative Code R307-
415-5d and based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry,l certifu that the
statements and information in this document are true, accurate, and complete.
If you have any questions or would like to discuss this report further, my point of contact
is Dr. Erik Dettenm aier 7 5 CEG/CEIEA, at (80 I ) 777 -0888 or erik.dettenmaier. 1 @us.af.mil.
Sincerely
A*
DANIEL L. CORNELIUS, Colonel, USAF
Installation Commander
Attachment:
Source Test Report
UTAH DI-.PAIIIMENT OF
E I.JVIRONME NTNL QUALITYI
M/rIl 1 1 2n25
DI\./ISION OF AIR OUALITY
Allare
Source Test Report
Jacobs Engineering Group
Building 1286
Hill Air Force Base, UT 84056
Sources Tested: Boilers #l & #2
Test Dates: January 14 & 15,2025
Project No. AST-2025 -0187
_ ^y Illl l? f. , ,^ ,,-- r frF NfbF-EJyEqN 1.4 E-|'LIA! q uA L I rY
DIVISION OF AIR OI 'ALITY
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT
f--'f-Alfarpe Source Test Report
Tesl Program Summary
Regulatory Information
Permit No.
Source Information
DAQE-AN I 01210290-24
Source Name
Boiler #l
Boiler #2
Contact Information
Source ID
AQUrS #4s30s
AQUrS #4s306
Targel Parameters
NOx, CO
NOx, CO
Tesl Location
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Building 1286
Hill Air Force Base, Utah 84056
Air Program Manager
Dr. Erik Dettenmaier
erik.dettenmaier. I @us. af.mil
[phone]
Senior Technical Consultant
Mitch Lindsay, PE
mitch. I [e-mail]
(43s) 901-8709
BIEST Program Manager
Melissa Cary
[e-mail]
(80r) 550-3425
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Austin Mayfield
austin.mayfi [e-mail]
[phone]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
[e-mail]
(8t2\ 4s2478s
Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
[e-mail]
Report Reviewer
Sarah Perry
sarah. [e-mail]
AST-2025-0 I 87 Page iJacobs - Hill AFB, UT
2of6l
Source Test Reporl
C e rl i fi ca t ion St oteme n I
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf; and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
2118t2025
Charles Horton, QSTI
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Date
AST-2025-0 r 87 Page iiJacobs Hill AFB, UT
3 of 6l
r'-'F^'AIlalrce Source Tesl Report
Table ofContents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification................... ................... l-l
3. I U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate ........ 3- I
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide......... .........3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisrure Content......... ....................... 3-l
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides .........3-2
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l0 - Carbon Monoxide..... ........................3-2
3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 - Mass Emission Factors .....................3-2
3.7 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification. ....................... 3-2
3.8 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A, 7E and 10..........................3-2
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix D Process Operating/Control System Data
Jacobs - Hill AFB, UT
4of6l
AST-2025-0 I 87 Page iii
5 of6l
r-'AIAIEe Source Test Reporl
lntroductktn
1.0 lntroduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (Jacobs) to conduct
compliance testing at the Hill Air Force Base (AFB) outside of Salt Lake City, Utah. Portions of the facility are
subject to provisions of the Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) DAQE-ANl0l2l0290-24. Testing was
conducted to determine the emission rates of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO) from the exhaust of
two (2) natural gas fired boilers (Boilers #l and #2) in service at Hill AFB, Building 1286.
l.l Facility Description
Hill AFB is located approximately 30 miles north of Salt Lake City, Utah. The base provides worldwide logistics
support for some of the Air Force and Defense Department's most sophisticated weapons systems. Hill AFB is a
major source for NOx emissions. The boilers at Hill AFB are a significant contributor of NOx emissions. Hill AFB
operates several large natural gas fired boilers. Boiler #l and Boiler #2 in Building 1286 are each rated at 59.4
MMBtu/hr and were recently installed to replace three old boilers in Building 1286. These two boilers were tested to
satis$ the Approval Order requirements pertaining to these boilers.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table l-l: Project Team
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by Jacobs.
Jacobs - Hill AFB, UT
6 of6l
Jacobs Personnel Max Gouveia
Mitch Lindsay
Alliance Personnel
Austin Mayfield
Conner Rasmussen
Mitchell Manwaring
AST-2025-0 r 87 Page l -l
7 of6l
AI FlalEet'.'Source Tesl Reporl
Summary of Results
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the AFB outside of Salt Lake City, Utah on January 14 and 15,2025.
Testing consisted of determining the emission rates of NOx and CO at the exhaust of Boiler #l and Boiler #2 in
service at Hill AFB, Building 1286. Each run was conducted at a minimum of 95o/o of the rated capacity. The rated
capacity for each boiler is 59.4 MMBtU/hr.
Tables 2-l and2-2 provide summaries of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable permit
limits. Any difference between the summary results listed in the following tables and the detailed results contained
in appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Results - Boiler #l
Jacobs - Hill AFB. UT
8 of6l
4. l0
10.20
16.4
56,500
95
4.07
10.13
16.4
55,867
95
rbon Dioxide Concentration, 7o dry
4.00
10.10
16.3
54,600
95
4.10
10.10
16.4
56,500
95
Concentration, ppmvd
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Permit Limit, lb/hr
Percent of Limit, 7o
Emission Factor, lbA,IMBtu
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
2.1 8
<1
0.00
itrogen Oxides Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Permit Limit, ppmvd
Percent of Limit, 7o
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Permit Limit, lbAr
Percent of Limit, 7o
Emission Factor, lbA,IMBtu
8.40
0.45
1.08E-02
8.30
0.M
1.07E42
8.40
0.45
1.098-02
8.37
9
93
0.45
0.65
69
L08E-02
AST-2025-0t87 Page2-l
AI rTAIEE
':,Source Test Report
Summary of Results
Table 2-2; Summary of Results - Boiler #2
Jacobs - Hill AFB, UT
9 of6l
Concentrationro/o dry
Dioxide Concentration, o/o dry
4.20
9.90
16.3
49,400
95
4.10
9.90
r 6.6
49,450
95
4.10
9.60
16.4
49,450
95
Concentration, ppmvd
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Permit Limit, lb/hr
Percent of Limit, %o
Emission Factor, lb/MMBtu
0.51
0.016
4.028-04
0.25
0.0077
1.98E44
0. l0
0.0030
7.86E-05
0.29
0.0088
2.t8
<l
2.268-04
itrogen Oxides Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Permit Limit, ppmvd
Percent of Limit, 7o
Emission Rate, lb/tr
Permit Limit, lb/hr
Percent of Limit, 7o
Emission Factor, lb/MMBtu
7.90
0.40
1.038-02
6.60
0.33
8.54E-03
6.20
0.31
8.038-03
6.90
9
77
0.35
0.65
53
8.958-03
AST-202s-01 87 Page2-2
l0 of6l
Allalpe ,Sourw T'e.sl Reporl
Te.t I i ng lvte t hodo k ry1,
3.0 Testing Mcthodology
The ernission testing prograln was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix C.
Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodology
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sarnpling location and number of traverse (sanrpling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To detennine the rninimurn number of traverse points, the upstream and downstreatn
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure l-2 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure. static pressure and ternperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined rnanorneter. The stack gas temperature was nleasured with a K-rype
thennocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was
utilized to calculate the volurnetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxidc
The oxygen (O:) and carbon dioxide (CO:) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3A. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a
stainless-steel probe, Teflon saurple line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to reurove moisture frorn the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.8.
3.3 U.S. EPA Referencc Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content (BWS) was detennined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The
gas conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled irnpingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a
knownquantityofwaterorsilicagel. Eachirnpingerwasanalyzedgravimetricallybeforeandaftereachtestrunon
the same balance to detennine the amount of moisture condensed.
Jacobs Hill AFI]. U'I
I I ol'61
Parame0er U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remarts
Volumetric Flow Rate t&2 Full Velocity Traverses
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Instrurnental Analysis
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analvsis
Nitrogen Oxides 7E Instrumental Analysis
Carbon Monoxide l0 lnstrumental Analysis
Mass Emission Factors l9 Fuel Factors / l{eat Input
Gas Dilution Systenr Certification 205
AS'r'-2025-0 | 87 Page 3-l
Aliatpe
Source Test Reporl
Testing Methodoktg'
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides
The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 78. Data
was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe,
Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a
non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used,
then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon
sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.8.
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10 - Carbon Monoxide
The carbon monoxide (CO) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10. Data
was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe,
Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system, and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a
non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used, then a
portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample
line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.8.
3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l9 - Mass Emission Factors
The pollutant concentrations were converted to mass emission factors (lb/MMBtu) using procedures outlined in U.S.
EPA Reference Test Method 19. The published dry O: based fuel factor (F-Factor) of 8,710 dscf/MMBru for
natural gas was used in the calculations.
3.7 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification
A calibration gas dilution system field check was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method 205.
An initial three (3) point calibration was conducted, using individual Protocol I gases, on the analyzer used to
complete the dilution system field check. Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates were utilized to force the
dilution system to perform two dilutions on each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases was sent
directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. A mid-level supply gas,
with a cylinder concentration within l07o of one of the gas divider settings described above, was introduced directly
to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and
the analyzer response agreed within ZYo. These steps were repeated three (3) times. The average analyzer response
agreed within 2o/o of the predicted gas concentration. No single injection differed more than 2o/o from the average
instrument response for that dilution. Copies of the Method 205 data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality
Control Appendix.
3.8 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A, 7E and 10
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol I (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Qualiry Control Appendix.
Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5
ppmv lo/o absolute difference.
Jacobs Hill AFB, UT
l2 of6l
AST-2025-01 87 Page 3-2
f::Alialpe
Source Tesl Repurl
Testing Methodoktgt
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppmv/% (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was
recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to
decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppmv/%o (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low-
Level gas was zero gas, the response was 0.5 ppmvloh or 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration (whichever
was less restrictive). The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded.
The measurement system response time and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias
was within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concenffation) was introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and
System Bias were repeated.
Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute
difference. If the drift exceeded 3 percent or 0.5 ppmv/7o, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated.
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The
pollutant concentrations were measured at twelve traverse points (as described in Method I ) for Boiler # I and three
points (16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line) for Boiler #2. Each traverse point was sampled for a
minimum of t'wice the system response time.
If the pollutant concentration at each traverse point did not differ more than 5 percent or 0.5 ppmv/0.3% (whichever
was less restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling was conducted during the test
nrns. If the pollutant concentration did not meet these specifications but differed less than l0 percent or 1.0
ppmvl}.So/o from the average concenffation, then three (3) point sampling was conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in
diameter - 16.7,50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter- 0.4, 1.0,
and 2.0 meters from the stack wall). If the pollutant concentration differed by more than l0 percent or 1.0
ppmvl}.Soh from the average concentration, then sampling was conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse
points. Copies of stratification check data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
An NOz - NO converter check was performed on the analyzer at the completion of testing. An approximately 50
ppm nitrogen dioxide cylinder gas was introduced directly to the NOx analyzer and the instrument response was
recorded in an electronic data sheet. The instrument response was within +/- l0 percent of the cylinder
concentration.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
Jacobs Hill AFB, UT
l3 of 6l
AST-2025-0 I 87 Page 3-3
l4 of6l
Example Calculations
Ru No.
Pmmter(i)
Mctcr Prcsrure (Pm),ln. H8
AHPm = Pb+-. 135wrerc.Pb 25,2t1 = barometric pressurc, in. HgAH l.tl50 = pressure diffcrential oforilice. in H1O
Pm 25.42 = in. Hg
Abcolule Strck Grs Prelrure (Ps), in. H8
Psps = pb+*
rhcre.
Pb j?!_= brumctric pressure, in. Hg
Pg j9]_=.tatic pressurc, in. HrOPs 25.28 = in. Hg
Sartrdrrd Melcr volum (Vmid), dlct
l7.536xVmxPmxY
Tm
where.Y 0.995 = rcter co[ection factor
v.766il = mecr volum. cf
Pm 25.42 = absolutc metcr pressure, in. Hg
Tm 524.7 = absolute mctcr tempcraturc. oR
Vmstd 38.172 = dscf
Sartrdrrd Wel volum (vrrtd), sf
Vwstd= 0.047l6xVlc
where.
Vlc 157.'l = weight of HrO collected, gv*.rd74r-= scf
Moisiure Frrctiotr (BWS$ra), dimnsionlets (thcoretical rt sraursted condltioN)
,oe:z-(t'ffi)- BWSsat =
-
wlErer o?
Tr4= ttack temperaturc, oF
Pt__2L= "bsolutc stack gas prcssure, in. Hg
BWSsat 1.000 = dircnsionless
Moirture Frrctlon (BWS). dimnrioolac
BWS =Vwstd
wherc.fVrustd * Vmstd)
Vwstd 7.437 = shndrrd wet volum. scf
vmstd-JlF= standard metcr volume. dscf
Bws
-J6i-'
dimnsronlcss
Moistur. Frrcaiotr (BWS). dlmnrioolcsr
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat < BWSmsd
wherc,
BWSst 1.000 = moisture Aaction (theoretical at saturated conditions)
Bwsmsd:L!q_= misture fiaction (rcasurcd)
BWS 0. r63
Molecuhr Wclsht (DRY) (Md), lbnLmle
Md = (0.44 x o/oCOz) + (0.32 xo/oO2) + (0.28(100- 7oCO2- o/oO2))
where.
CO, I 0.1 = carbon dioxide conccntration, 70
O, A = oxYgcn conccnmtion, 7o
Md 29.78 = lb/lb mol
l5 of 6l
FTAAI Example Calculations
Molecul.r Weighl (WET) (Ms), lbnt>ml.
Ms = Md (1 - BwS) + 18.015 (BWS)
where.
29.',tt----o-:iei-
-21.s6-
= molecular wcight (DRY). lb/lb mol
= moisturc fraction, dimensionless: lb/lb mol
Averrgc Velcity (Vs), ll/se
. Vs = 85.49 x Cp x (A ptl?)avg xwmre,
Cp-..]Lql-= pitot tube cGflicient
A P"2 0.505 - average pre/posi test vclocity head ofsuck gas, (in. H1o)r/r
ts---@= ove.gc Pre/post test absolutc stack tcmperarure, "R
Ps 25.28 = absolute stack gd pressurc. in. Hg
t"t. -71d6- = molsular weight of stack gas. lb/lb mol
vr...'...........i'F=ft/rec
AverrSe Strcl Grs Flor st St8ck CondltioN (Qr), scfm
Qa=60xVsxAs
,lrcrc,
Vr4= stack gas velocity, fVsec
As 6.611 = cross-sectional arca ofstack. ftlQu-ffi=""f.
Averegc Stack G$ Flow sl Slrndsrd Cotrdltlonc (Qs), dscfm
Qsd= 17.636xQax(l -BWS)x
whcre,
Qa 14,991 : avcragc sack gas flow at shck conditions. trfmBWS 0.163 =moisrurcfraction,dimensionlessPsTi-= "bsolute stack gas prrssure, in. Hg
Ts 749.'1 = average pre/post tcsl absolute stack temp€rature. "RQs--li7f =,1'"6,
Dry G.s Meter Crllbrrtion Check (Yqr). percert
Ps
Ts
vau avs.
)
/s
(*
Yqa
whcrc.
Y _--.]q2L= .eter corection factor, dimensionlcss
O 60 = run timc. min.
Vm 44.505 = toul metcr volume. dcf
T- 5UJ_= absolutc met€r tcmpeBture. oR
AH@-!L= orifice m€ter calibration ccfficicnt, in. H2()
Pb 25.28 = bromctric pressure, in. Hg
AH avg l-850 = average prcssure diffcrential oforifice, in HlO
Md_-?1L= moleculil weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
(A H)"r L360 = averagc squarc root pressure difTerential oforifice, (in. HlO)lr
Yqa -42 - percent
x 100
Lsrtion
Sourcc Boiler #l
Prolect No.
Run No.
Pmmtcr(r)
Md
BWS
Ms
Y-
l6 of6l
lullElrpe
Location: Jacobs Engineering - Hill Air Force Base, UT
Example Calculations
Source: Boiler #l
Project No.: AST-2025-01 87
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 3A
Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Qs), dscfm
FpxFgyxFdx ( rgr-%)Qs:
l.0E+06 x 60
whereo FR 54,600 : fuel rate, scftrFHv-Ttr4F: tuel heating value, Bhr/scfFF*,o,.-llTF : fuel factor, dscf/MMBtuCo2-- : oxygen concentration, 7o
Qs 10,194 : dscfm
Oz - Outlet Concentration (Co), o/o dry
co,: (co6,-c6)x ( (t'f.n)
where,Cob, 4.1 : average analyzer value during test, % dry
C"-T-: average of pretest & posttest zero responses, o/o dry
CMA-T0'F= actual concentration of calibration gas,Yo dry
CM
-Tm-
: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, o/o dry
C* 73- : oz Concentration, %o dry
COr - Outlet Concentration (Cco), o/o dry
Cco,: (Co6,-C6)x ( (c*rcrlfu)
where,Cob, l0.l I : average analyzer value during test, % dry
C.-OIIF: average of pretest & posttest zero responses,Vo dry
CMA-TOTF: actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry
CM
-T0'T3-:
average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, %o dry
Cco,-T0-TF: Co, Concentration, 7o dry
l7 of 6l
tr-*'AIATEe Example Calculations
Location: Jacobs Engineering - Ilill Air Force Base, UT
Source; Boiler # I
Project No.: AST-2025-0 I 87
Run No. /Method Run I / Method l0
CO - Outlet Concentration (Ccq), ppmvd
Cco: (C,,6,-C6)x ( #;r)
where,C.b, 0.00 : average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
C.
-0-.0-0-:
average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA-Ttr0F: actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
C"
-T0'.[()-
: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
Cco-O'[F: Co Concentration, ppmvd
CO - Outlet Emission Rate (ER.o), lb/hr
min L
oo^ _ Cco x MW x Qs x 60; x28.32 nLr\co
where,Cc.o 0.00 : CO - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
Mw-8.01-: Co molecular weight, g/g-mole
Q"@:stackgasvolumetricflowrateatstandardconditions,dscfmERco-[:0(J-: rb/hr
CO - Outlet Emission Factor (EFcoo,o), lb/MMBtu
EFcoo.a: ERcoxKxFdx (-2ffi
where,Cco 0.00 : CO - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
K 7.274568-08 : constant, lb/dscf ' ppmvdFd-8-,7T-: tuel factor, dscf/MMBtu
Co,-00-: oxygen concentration, 7o
E Fcoo,d
-0-:0-00i-
: lb/M M Bru
l8 of 6l
AltrcrrEe
Location: Jacobs Engineerine - Hill Air Force Base, UT
Example Calculations
Source: Boiler #l
Project No.: AST-2025-0187
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 7E
NOx - Outlet Concentration (Cxo,), ppmvd
cNo*: (C.5,-C6)x ( (t'ftJ)
where,Cob, 8.42 : average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
C"-0:0T-: average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA-TdOF: actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM
.-98-: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CNo,
-.U-
: NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Emission Rate (ERxo), lb/hr
oo _ - CNo*xMWxQsx60# x28.32 #-^No* -
where,C*o,-!!!-: NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 46.0055 : NOx molecular weight, g/g-mole
Q"@:stackgasvolumetricflowrateatstandardconditions,dscfrnERN.*-075-: lb/hr
NOx - Outlet Emission Factor (EFxo,o.a), lb/MMBtu
EF1ro*o,a: Cx6*xKxFdx (#"J
where,C*o^A: NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
K 1.194828-07 : constant, lb/dscf ' ppmvd
F4-s]Ti)- : tuel factor, dscf/MMBtu
Co,7l0F: oxygen concentration, 7o
EFNo*o,,, --:0TT- : lb/MM Btu
l9 of 6l
20 of6l
2l of6l
AITATEE Emissions Calculations
Location Jacobs Engineering - Hitl Air Force Base, UT
Source Boiler #l
Project No. AST-2025-0 I 87
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Average
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
Ut4125
I l:54
l2:53
vt4t25 t/14t25
13:30 14:45
14:29 15:44
Source Data
Boiler Ratings, MMBtu/hr
Boiler Load, %
Fuel Heating Value, Btu/scf
Fuel Factor (O2 dry), dscf/MMBtu
Fuel Rate, scfh
EL
FHv
Fd
FR
59.4
95
1,040
8,710
54,600
59.4
95
r,040
8,7 r0
56,500
59.4 59.4
95 95
1,040 1,040
8,710 8,710
56,500 55,867
Input Data - Outlet
Moisture Fraction, dimensionless
Volumetric Flow Rate (M I -4), dscfin
Volumetric Flow Rate (Ml9), dscfm
BWS
Qs
Qs
0.1 63
7,462
10, I 94
0.164
7,409
10,6t2
0.164 0.164
7,409 7,427
10,612 10,473
Calculated Data - Outlel
Oz Concentration, o/o dry co, 4.00 4. I 0 4. l0 4.07
COz Concentration, % dry cco, 10. 10 I 0. t 0 I 0.20 t 0. 13
CO Concentration, ppmvd
CO Emission Rate, lb/hr
CO Emission Factor, lb/MMBtu (O2d)
Cco
ERco
EFco oza
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.00
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Emission Rate, lb/hr
NOx Emission Factor, lb/I\4MBtu (O2d)
Cno^
ERr.,o"
EFno* o:a
8.40 8.30 8.40 8.37
0.45 0.44 0.45 0.45
1.08E-02 t.07E-02 I .09E-02 1.08E-02
22 of 6l
AI FlalEe Runl-RMData
rl
Lc.lion: Jeobs - Hill Air Forcc Bm. UT
Drtc: l/
Timc
IJnil
O: - Outlet
o/. dry
COr-Outlct CO-Outht NOr-Oulht
Yo dry Dpdvd ppdvd
Uncorrected Run Aver.ge (C6.)
Crl C.i CoDccntrrtioo (Ch)
Preleli Syrlem 2ro Rarpons
Potflatt Syitaf, Zao RaapoM
Averrg€ 7rm Rctponrc (Co)
Prctcrt Syrlem C.l Rerpo@
Porttdl Syrtem Crl R6poGc
Avcr.ge Crl Relpo6c (CM)
4.09 lO.t I
1 0.00 1 0.1 00.26 0.00
0 00 0.00
0. I 3 0.00
to.l I lo.t It0.09 t0.r410.10 l0.ll3.97 | 0.0t
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.96
r0.04
10.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
00r
0.01
9.99
996
998
I l:54
I l:55
I l:56
I l:57
I I:5t
I l:59
l2:00
l2:01
12t02
| 2:03
| 2:04
l2:05
I 2:06
l2:01
l2:08
l2:09
l2:10
l2:l I
l2:12
l2:13
l2:14
| 2:15
l2:16
l2:11
l2rl8
l2:19
I 2:20
l2:21
l2:22
12.23
12124
l2:27
t2:76
l2:21
l2:28
l2:29
| 2:10
| 2:31
l2:32
l2:l l
| 2:34
l2:35
I 2:16
12131
l2:18
l2:39
l2:40
l2t4l
l2:42
l2:41
l2:44
l2:45
l2:46
l2:41
l2:4a
l2:49
l2:50
l2:51
l2:52
l2:53
402
4.01
4.05
4.04
4.04
4.01
4.05
4.03
4.03
402
4.04
40s
4M
4.M
4.05
405
4.06
4.01
407
406
4.01
4.06
4.08
407
4.01
4.tI
409
4.t0
4 t0
4 t0
4.t2
4.t3
4 t5
4.14
4.t5
4 t5
4 15
4 tl
4.t0
408
4.t0
4.09
4.09
4. t0
,1. I I
4.tI
4.il
4.13
4.t4
4.t4
4.t4
4.13
4.t5
4.16
4.16
4t4
4.t4
4.14
4.13
4.t2
t0.12
t0.l I
t0.lt
t0. t0
t0.l I
l0.D
t0.t0
l0.t I
10.r2
10.t2
10.t0
10.10
l0.t I
l0.t I
I0.t I
I0.t I
10.t0
t0.t 2
10.t0
l0.t I
10.t0
t0.l I
10.t0
t0.t I
l0.t I
10.09
10.09
10.09
10.09
I0.09
t0.08
10.07
10.07
r0.07
t0 07
t0.08
10.09
t0.t0
l0.t I
t0.t 2
t0.t 2
10.t2
t0.12
t0.t2
t0.12
t0.l I
t0.tl
t0.l I
t0.t I
t0.r I
t0.10
t0.t2
10.1 2
t0.10
t0.l I
10.t2
t0. l2
t0. l2
t0. l2
t0. ll
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
8.37
8.42
t.36
8.43
8.40
t40
8.43
843
t.47
t.41
843
t.44
t.45
8.41
846
8.43
8.42
8.4s
8.43
8.43
8.46
8.42
t.40
t.42
8.44
8.39
t.45
8.39
I4t
8.44
840
t.40
839
t.l5
8.34
816
t.l4
442
8.49
845
8.45
8.48
t.46
4.46
8.41
8.48
8.46
8.42
8.19
4.42
a.42
8.44
8.43
8.19t.lt
8.40
8.19
t.50
8.43
849
23 of 6l
Al6rce Run2-RMData
,IL1
Locrllotr: Jacok 'Hill Air Force
Source:
Prcject No.:
Drt€l
Ot - Outl.t COr - Ourld CO - OutLl NOr - Outlet
'Ld.f 'hdr! ppDvd ppdvd
valid vdid Vrlid Velid
4.tl
r0.00
0.00
0.0r
0.01
10.09
t0.t0
t 0.10
4.09
10. r2
r0. t0
0.00
0.00
0.00
t0.t4
r0.t 2
t0.13
0.00
10.00
000
0.00
0.00
l0.M
9.99
r0.02
8.12
t0.00
0.0r
0.00
0.01
9.96
10.t5
10.06
l3:30
l l:31
I 3:32
I l:ll
| 3:14
I l:15
I 3:16
| 3:17
ll:18
ll:39
l3:40
I l:41
l3:42
I l:41
11144
I l:45
I l:46
l)147
l3:48
I l:49
I l:50
I l:51
l.l:52
I l:53
I l:54
I l:55
I 3:56
| 3:57
I 3:58
I 3:59
14i00
l4:01
l4:02
l4:03
I4:04
l4:05
l4:06
l4:07
l4:08
14r09
| 4;10
l4:l I
l4:1 2
l4:ll
l4:14
l4:l 5
l4:16
l4:11
l4:18
l4 rl9
l4:20
l4:21
l4:22
l4:23
l4:24
l4:25
l4:26
I 4:21
l4:28
l4:79
4.t1
4.t6
4.t6
4.14
4.16
4.t5
4.14
4.12
4.1 I
4.15
4.r5
4.t1
4.15
4.14
4.t2
4.t2
4.13
4.15
4.t4
4.t4
4.tl
4.t4
4. t6
4.t3
4.t4
4.13
4.r l
4.t4
4. l3
4.t4
4. t6
4.t2
4.t3
4.13
4.15
4.t0
4.t2
4.t I
4.1I
4.t2
4.12
4.tI
4.09
4. l0
4.t I
4.12
4.t I
4.t4
4.t2
4.t2
4.t2
4.t I
4.t0
4.t2
4.t I
4.1 I
4.12
4.t I
4.t I
4il
t0.t I
t0. t2
t0. t2
t0. t5
l0.tl
t0.tl
l0.tl
t0.t4
t0.15
t0.tll0.ll
l0.t I
10.r2
t0.ll
10.14
t0.13
t0.13
10.1 2
10.t2
10.1 2
t0.tl
l0.ll
l0.t I
10.t3
t0.t2
l0.t 3
I0.t2
r0.t I
r0. l2
t 0.12
t0.t I
t0. t3
t0. l3t0l2
t0. l2
t0.t4
t0. tl
t0.14
10.t3
10.t2
t0. t3
I0.t4
t0.14
t0.t 5
I0.t3
t0.13
I0.t4
t0.t 2
t0.t I
10.t0
t0.t0
l0.t I
10.t0
10.t0
t0.t I
l0.t I
l0.t I
t0.t I
I0.t Il0il
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.24
8.21
8.30
8.33
8.3{i
8.33
8.31
8.41
8.13
8.35
8.35
t.l2
8.13
8.14
8.36
t.l7
8.15
8.15
8.1?
t.l6
8.34
8.t5
a.27
8.1l
8.12
8.34
8.33
t.3l
8.36
8.29
8.22
8.32
8.42
t.l7
8.28
8.21
8.25
8.1I
r.33
8.31
8.32
8.29
8.29
8.35
8.3t
t.l I
8.34
8.21
8.26
8.3r
8.35
8.36
t.27
8.35
8.33
8.31
r.37
8.32
8.36
8.15
Uilomclcd Rutr Avaaaga
C.l Grr Corc.ntntiotr (CM^)
PrtBl Sy.t€n Z.m n.rpou.
Pdttcrl Syrt.o Z.m R6poM
Avengc Zerc R6poNe (Co)
Pnt6l Sy.t.m Crl n6poe
Portterl Syttem C.l Rc.poN.
Avcdg. Crl R6poB. (CH)
24 of 6l
AI6rce Run3-RMData
l(ll.; C.tL
L*.tioo,a"-*".
Dr.l"". N^ .
Drr.: l/14/25
Time
Unit
Sbtur
Ot - Outlel COt - Outlel CO - Outht NOt - OutlelY.dry '/.dry ppmvd ppmvdValid Valid Valid Valid
Unco.dtcd Ruo Av.rrg. (Cd)
C.l G.t Conc.otr.don (Cu)
Prctcal Syrtam Zcrc R6poe
Portlc.t Syrtem Zeru R6po!.c
Av.ilg. z.re nBpooe (Co)
Preteri Syrtem Crl R6ponte
Pornert Sylleh Cal RelpoNe
Avcngc Ctl RgpoBc (CM)
4.16
t0.00
0.0t
0.07
0.04
t0. t0
I0. l0
t0. t0
10.1 6
t0.t0
000
0.00
0.00
t0. r2
10.07
10. r0
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.99
9.85
9.92
8.50
t0.00
0.00
0.25
0.rl
t0. l5
r 0.0t
t0.08
4 l0 84
l4:45
l4:46
l4:47
l4:4t
l4:49
l4:50
l4:51
l4:52
l4:51
l4:54
l4:55
l4:56
l4:57
l4:58
l4:59
I 5r00
l5:01
| 5:02
I 5:01
l5:04
| 5:05
I 5:06
l5:07
| 5:08
I 5:09
l5:10
I5:l I
I5: l2
l 5:13
l 5:14
l5:15
l5: l6
l5: l7
I J:18
l5rl9
I 5:20
l5:21
I 5:22
I 5:23
I 5:24
l5:25
I 5r26
I 5:27
I 5:28
I 5:29
I 5:30
l5:31
l5:32l5:ll
I 5:34
l5:15
I 5:16
l5:37
l5:38
l5:39
l5:40
l5:41
15142
l5:41
l5:44
4.l l
4.t3
4.14
4.15
4.t1
4.15
4.t6
4.18
4.t4
4.t5
4.t4
4.tl
4.11
4.lrt
4.23
4.29
4.t8
4.t2
4.t5
4.26
4.23
4.22
4.t5
4 15
4.14
412
4.t34.ll
4.t4
4.15
4.t2
4.12
4.13
4.13
4.t2
4.15
4. tl
4.12
4. t5
4.t4
4.16
4. l6
4. t3
4.t1
4.18
4.t7
4.t6
4.t1
4.t"|
4.t5
4. t4
4.t6
4.14
4.t4
4.18
4.20
4.18
4.18
4.15
t0.tl
l0.tl
l0.t I
10.1 2
t0.12
t0. l3
t0.13
10.t2
10. l4
10.t4
t0.t5
r0.t5
10.t2
10.t4
t0.t0
10.08
t0.t4
10.1 8
t0.t5
t0.09
IO,I I
10.t4
t0.16
10.r6
10.18
10.19
t0.t8
t0.19
t0.t9
t0.19
t0. I7
t0. l9
t0. l8
t0.t8
1 0.19
t0.20
t0.lt
t 0.19
t0. t9
I0.18
t0.t8
10.t8
t0.t 7
t0.t9
t0. t7
r0.16
t0.17
t0 l8
t0.17
t0.17
t0.t8
t0. l8
IO,IE
t0.19
t0 t8
t0.t7
t0.15
t0.15
t0l6
t0. l7
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.fi)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
000
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.58
8.52
t.50
851
t.55
t.45
4.41
8.46
8.42
t.49
8.48
4.41
8.42
8.51
8.40
8.2t
8..35
8.48
8.55
4.44
a.2'7
8.44
t.4l
8.45
8.55
8.5 t
8.50
t.5l
8.49
8.58
8.48
8.55
8.61
8.58
t.63
8.60
8.50
8.51
t.48
8.55
8.54
8.49
8.51
8.53
8.56
8.52
8.48
8.55
t.46
8.42
8.54
8.51
8.55
t.54
8.50
8.55
t.46
8.41
8.50
8.50
25 of6l
AItlalEe Method l Data
- Hlll Ak Ftrc. BiE. trT
Sou.c. Boller il
koiet No. AsT-lo2glt7
D.l.0l/ll/13
Dul Od.nirilo: Vsrid
DftllblSn: (.ffi
Dhl.nc. frm F.r W.ll ao Ourldc ofPod: 4m ln
Nlpph knrrl: m h
Ihprb of lhr: 35tr ln
Wldih of Dut: 43.00 ln
cr6. kild.l aEi d D*,,----iif-n'
Eqdvtlcrl Dhrut.r: lffi ln
No. of T.rl PnB: l
\unhr otR..di!r Fr Pour'-----l-
Dlrotrc. A; m ff
DLbtr..l Duct Dlrmr.rr: il (dui b. >0.S)
Dbbtrc.8: s 0 fi
Dktrnc. B Ducr Dl.ftr..',----Ei--t.*r l.::t
Mldlocr NoEb.r ofTrrr.rr Pdnb: D
Ach.l Nmkr dTr."trr Poht: r
Mcrilrcr tlnlihl rnd D.t.): MDM
Rcil.i.r (Inlll.l .d D.t.): ( SR
I
I
I,OCATION OF TRAVERSf, rcIMS
Nuk. of ,ne.e pddt N . dbrd..
t
3
a
5
6
7
I
9
l0lt
t2
,!,t 9 t0 t2
14.6 6_1 4.4 I I .. 7_6 .. 2 I
85 4 15.0 t4.6 t0 5 .. E.l 6-7. 75.0 .. :9 6 .. 19.4 14.6 I t.8
9l.l -. 70 4 I!.1 22.6 .- 11.1
EJ4 61.7 .. l4t :50
95.6 80.6 65.E :|5.6.. 89J .- 714 .- &4
- 968 .. 85.{ '509t.E 8l.l
974 882
9t.l
91.5
'Petcnt ttil** dioilet{ ln'il ilitrk'sull n, rdwN F\Dt
Pdnt Dl.mi.l
Dld.trc.
lm lorld,lrM
drl& d
I
3
4
3
6
1t
9
t0
il
t2
1.2
t0.5
19.4
t)2.3
E0.6
89.5
l.l2
3.6t
I t.ll
21.70
:t.21
3t.31
]],EE
I t/8
lo I t/t6ll ll/16t8 5/t6
l0 I t/t6
t5 l/t6
lE 5/t6
Stul Diagtam
-:OR
a {fi
Dsth ofDud 15 in
(arKq Setnhrl Ar.,
Dl.tutb.ne
aaaooaoa
Upiaaam
26 of 6l
AI F]a Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Jacobs Engineering - Hill Air Force Base, UT
Source Boiler #l
Project No. AST-2025-0187
Date l/13/25
Sample Point Angle (AP=0)
I
)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
t2
13
l4
l5
t6
Average
5
5
t0
5
l5
l0
5
5
5
t0
l0
5
5
l0
5
5
7.2
27 of6l
AlArce Field Data
Method 2 Data
Ircrtion Jecobs Ensineerins - Hill Air Force Base. UT
Source Boiler #l
Project No. AST-202fl)187
I
I /14/25
VALID
I l:54
l2:54
Pass
)
vt4t25
VALID
l4:30
l5:30
Pass
3
t/t4/25
VALID
l5:45
l6:45
Pass
A-t
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
A-8
B-l
B-2
B-3
B-4
B-5
B-6
B-7
B-8
0.31
0.30
0.25
0.24
0.2 r
0.21
0.22
0.2 t
0.12
0.-r I
0.29
0.25
0.26
0.24
0.23
0.23
2t14
286
2tttt
284
2trtt
2tt9
2tt9
290
29?
292
291
293
293
252
294
295
0.2ti
0.30
0.21
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.21
0.21
0.2tr
0.30
0.29
0.27
0.27
0.22
0.21
0.21
284
286
2ti6
286
2ti8
289
289
290
290
29'l
291
291
292
292
292
?92
0.28
0.29
0.30
0.27
0.24
0.23
0.21
0.20
0.28
0.30
0.30
0.28
0.21
0.21
0.22
o.23
284
284
286
286
28tt
289
290
292
292
293
293
293
292
291
291
290
0.501
0.25
0.840
25.28
0.01
25.28
289.1
749.0
0.164
1.000
0.t64
4.1
t0. r
?9.78
2',1.t15
37.1
I 4,887
53 I,695
tt,862
7,409
0.502
0.25
0.840
25.28
0.01
25.2t1
289.6
'149.3
0.1ff
t.000
0.1tr
4.1
10.2
29.80
27.86
37.2
I 4.900
53 1,943
8,866
Square Root of AP, (in. WC)ri2 (AP)"'
Average AP, in. WC (AP)
Pitot Tube Cmfficient (Cp)
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)
Static Pressure, in. WC (Pg)
Stack Pressure, in. Hg (Ps)
Average Temperature, oF (Ts)
Average Temperature, oR (Ts)
MeasuredMoislureFrsction (BWSmsd)
Moisture Fraction @ Srturation (BWSsat)
Moisture Frrction (BWS)
()2 Concentretion, Yo (O2)
CO2Concentration,7o (CO2)
Molecular Weight. lb/lb-mole (dry) (Md)
Molecular Weight, lbflb-'mole (wet) (Mo
Velocity, fUsec (Vs)
VFR at stack conditions, scfm (Qa)
VFR et strndrrd conditions, scfh (Qsw)
VFR at sarndrrd conditions, scfm (Qsw)
VFR rt standerd conditions. dscfm
0.505
0.26
0.840
25.2t1
0.01
25.2tr
290.0
749.7
0.t61
1.000
0.t63
4.0
10. I
29.7tr
27.86
37 .4
14.99 t
534,94tt
8.916
7,462
0.503
0.25
0.n40
25.28
0.01
25.2t1
289.6
749.3
0.1 64
1.000
0.1 64
4.t
10. I
29.78
27.86
37.2
14,926
532,862
8,88 I
28 ol6l
A/lArEe Method 4 Data
lncrtlor Jrcobr Enaloerlnt - Hlll Alr Forc. 8.*, UI
Sorrc Boll.r I I
D.^l*t l^
iflnct€dil VFR
lutr No.
)ata
;trlur
;t.tr Tlme
;rd Tlme
lon Tlmq mln (0)
I
vt4/21
VALID
I l:54
l2:54
60
M5-24
2
I / 14t25
VALID
I 4:10
l5:10
m
M5-24
U t4/25
VALID
l5:45
l6:45
60
M5-24
,d.r Co.rctlon Frcior (Y)
)r|fi.. Crllbntlor v.luc (AH (r )
{ar Vic[um, In. Hg
0.995
1.969
3
0.rmt
0.995
I 969
l
0.rn I
0.995
t. 9
-1
{d.r Volum.. n3
0
5
l0
l5
20
25
30
35
40
15
50
55
60
422.656
426.422
410.t79
433.850
417.5115
441.354
445.88
448.894
452.651
456.184
4m.|]0
463.796
461.56t
,t4.m5
467.884
47t.635
47J.175
479.|2
482 750
486.634
490.485
491.842
497.204
500.854
5fi.68t
508..1 l0
5 B.0l r
45.t41
5l 2.310
J t6.(b8
5t9.7t5
523.51 |
527.312
53r.021
534.131
518.695
542.282
545.984
549.6t4
553.400
557.5t6
45.t8rt
'anparrlurq oF
0
5
l0
l5
20
25
l0
35
40
,ts
50
55
60
lv.rrge T.mp..rlu& oF Cfm)
\v.nge T.op.r.tur€, oR (Tm)
{hlouE Tamp.r.lurq oF
{illhtrh T.nD.r.tur-'F
Mcter
51
51
59
6l
63
64
68
69
70
70'il
65
525
57
1t
Prcbe Flltrr Vacuum
3
3
l
l
3
l
l
l
l
l
3
3
l
l
t
3
mp. Erl
tl
14
34
t5
t1
l8
l9
40
4t
4t
42
42
42
t8
ll
42
Malar
64
65
65
68
6li
69
69
10
526
64
Probc Flllcr Vrcuum
3
l
l
l
l
3
3
l
3
l
3
3
3
3
l
Imp, Exll
33
l4
34
35
36
36
37
t8
l8
l9
40
40
4t
31
tl
Meter
72
72
17
13
13
't3
13
13
1t
74
14
't4
13
533
72
Ptub.Fllt!r !um lmp. Etl
12
42
43
43
43u
44
45
45
46
47
47
44
42
17
Lrcmcflc Prilrrq l[. Hg
,drr Orllle Prdrr.,ltr. WC
{dar Praaauft, ln. Hg
(pb)
(AH)
(Pft)
25.28
L850
25.42
t8 r72
25.28
1.850
25.4r
tn 249
25.28
t.850
25.42
ll 819
\r.lyrl! Typ.
mpltrger l, Prr/Port T$( I
rplng.r 2, Pr.y'Po.l T.ri, g
dpltrt.r !. Pr./Porl Tc.t, I
mpltrger 4. PrelPo.l Tert, g
/olc[c Wrtcr Colldcd.6L (vlc)
;tud.rd w.t.r volunc, d (vrtrd)
[olttur Fr.cilor Me.rured (BwS)
;x Molrul.r W.lgbl,lbnEmol. (dry) (Md)
)CM Crllbrrilotr Ch.cl vrluc (Yqr)
Crdvim.tric Gfrvimcric Gmvimcric
H20
H2C)
Empty
167.5
7t8.6
640.0
cr7d
861.0
111.1
642.0
971 9
91.5
54_1
2.0
H2c)
H20
E.pty
728.1
72t.7
640.4
8t9.3
78t.2
(A7.2
9t.0
59.5
t.86l
H20
H20
E.pty
693.9
104.4
64 1.8
s?4 I
8t3.4
7 t0.2
&.2
914 I
[9.5
5.8
2.4
15 7.7
1.4t7
0.t61
29.78
t59.1
7.50t
0.t64
29.7&
-t g
t57.7
7.417
0. t64
29 80
29 of6l
30 of6l
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Average
Date
Start Time
Stoo Time
Ut5l25
l2:46
l3:45
1lt5l25 1115125
14:13 15:35
15:12 16:34
Source Data
Boiler Ratings, MMBtu,ft r
Boiler Load, %
Fuel Heating Value, Bnr/scf
Fuel Factor (O2 dry), dscf/MMBru
Fuel Rate. scflr
EL
Fuv
Fd
FR
59.4
95
t,040
8,710
49,400
59.4
95
1,040
8,7t0
49,450
59.4 59.4
95 95
r,040 1,040
8,7 l0 8,7 I 0
49,450 49,433
Input Data - Outlet
Moisture Fraction, dimensionless
Volumetric Flow Rate (M l-4), dscfm
Volumetric Flow Rate (M l9), dscfm
BWS
Qs
Qs
0.r63
7,099
9.334
0.166
6,993
9,288
0.164 0.t64
6,976 7,023
9,288 9,303
Calculated Data - Outlet
O: Concentration, o/o dry C,r, 4.20 4. l0 4. I 0 4.t3
CO: Concentration, % dry cco, 9.90 9.90 9.60 9.80
CO Concentration, ppmvd
CO Emission Rate, lb/hr
CO Emission Factor, lb/\4MBtu (O2d)
Cco
E&'o
EFco oro
0.5 r 0.25
0.016 0.0077
4.028-04 1.98E-04
0. r0 0.29
0.0030 0.0088
7.868-05 2.268-04
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Emission Rate, lb/hr
NOx Emission Factor, lb/-lvlMBtu (O2d)
C"o^
ERNo^
EFNo^ o:a
7.90 6.60
0.40 0.33
r.03E-02 8.54E-03
6.20 6.90
0.31 0.35
8.03E-03 8.95E-03
A/lfuirce Emissions Calculations
Lo."tio,
Souaaa
Project No. AST-2025-0 I 87
3l of6l
Al6rce Runl-RMData
ti (. i.. L
Lmriion: Jacobs
a^',*-
P-l."t N^ .
Dtte: I/15/25
Time
Urit
Sbtui
Or -Outlct COr - Outl.t CO - Outht
'/. dr! '/. dry ppmvd
NOt - Outlcl
pp6vd
Uocomctcd Run Aver.ge (C&)
Crl Gr. Conceointion (C{^)
Pret$t Sy.tem Zcro Relponrc
Porftcrt Systam Zrro Rerpon*
Av€ngc Zrm R.1po-6c (Co)
Pret€lt Syrt.m Crl hlpome
Potttclt Systeo C.l R€rpoNe
Avengc C.l R6po6r (Cs)
4.34
t0.00
0.t4
0. l6
0.15
10.00
t0.09
l0 05
9.89
t0. t0
0.00
0.00
0.00
t0.22
t0.06
t0. t4
0.5 |
t0.00
0.00
0.00
000
9.99
r0.00
10.00
1 .91
t000
0.00
0.00
0.00
t0.t3
t0.t5
10.t4
Cormcted Run
l2:46
12.47
l2:4lt
l2:49
I 2:50
l2:51
l2:52
| 2:53
l2:54
I 2:55
l2:56
l2:51
I 2:58
I 2:59
ll:00
l3:01
I l:02
I 3:01
I 3:04
13i05
I l;06
I l:07
I l:08
I 3:09
l3: l0ll:l I
l l:12
l3: l3
l3: l4
I3rl5
l3: l6
l3:l ?
I l:l fi
1 3:19
| 3:20
ll:21
l3:22
l3:23
ll:24
ll:25
I 3:26
l1:21
I l:?8
I 3:29
I 3:10
l3:l I
| 3:12
I 3:13
l3:34
I 3:15
l3:36
I 3:37
ll:lt
l3:39
l3:40
l3:41
13142
l3:43
l3:44
I ll:45
4.29
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.2t
4.28
4.28
4.21
4.28
4.28
4.29
4.28
4.28
4.10
4.31
4.30
4.10
4.32
4.35
4.32
4.32
4.ll
4.13
4.31
4.34
4.34
4.33
4.15
4.34
4.15
4.15
4.36
4.36
4.35
4.16
4.35
4.36
436
4.16
4.36
4.31
4.31
4.15
4.71
4.35
4.t9
4.t8
439
4.39
4.38
4.40
4.41
4.4t
441
4.40
4.40
4.42
4.42
4.42
9.90
9.90
9.91
9.90
9.90
9.91
9.91
9.91
9.9t
9.90
9.91
9.91
9.91
9.90
9 9l
9.90
9.90
9.89
9.88
9.89
9.89
9.89
9.89
9.88
9.88
9.88
9.8E
9.88
9.88
9.89
9.88
988
9.88
9.88
9.88
988
9.E8
9.88
9t8
9.89
9.t9
9.88
9.t9
990
9.89
9.90
9.88
9.89
9.89
9.89
9.90
9.88
9.89
9.88
9.89
9.t9
989
9.88
9.tt
9.89
0.23
0.5
0.40
0.34
0.35
0.26
0.43
0.15
0.t5
012
0.16
L45
0.69
0.9r
t.4t
t.05
065
0.70
0.66
0t5
0.52
0.41
0.19
04J
0.18
0.30
0.52
0.58
0.19
0.42
0.30
046
0.52
0.21
087
0.52
t.04
0.5r
056
0.77
0.48
0.50
0.41
0.36
0.79
0.59
0.230.ll
0.85
0.55
0.56
0.6t
0.09
0.42
0. tl
0.46
0.20
0.23
0.2E
t.2l
8.2 r
8.20
8.t8
8.05
7.98
8,M
t.03
8.t0
t.04
790
7.86
7 .92
?.90
1.96
1.92
7.90
7.44
1.91
1.96
7.95
8.02
7.99
t.05
8.0?
8.07
8.09
8.09
8.M
8.08
t.07
8.03
7.91
7.90
1.94
1.91
7.89
1.86
1.A2
7.83
7.84
7.88
7.44
7.81
7.E5
7.90
7.90
7.t5
7.Et
1.92
1.96
1 .97
t.02
1.99
7 .95
7.96
t.02
8.00
8.0t
32 of 6l
AItAtre Run2-RMData
Locrdoo:
Tlfic
Utrll
Strtu
O, -Outlcl CO! - Outl.t
'hdry "/.dryValid Valid
CO-Outht NOr-OulLtppovd ppmvd
Vrlid Vslid
Uncomctcd Run Averrge (Ce)
Crl G$ Concenirrdotr (Cy^)
Prt6t Sy.tcD Zere R6DoM
Po.tte.l Syrtem Zcro RctpoM
Aveng€ Zrrc RerpoBe (Co)
PEt6t Syrten C.l R6poe
Po.nst Sy.t.m C.l Rc.ponre
AvcrrSc C.l R6poN. (CM)
4.30
t0.00
0.t6
0.57
0.37
10.09
t0.00
10.05
9.85
t0.t0
0.00
0.00
0.00
r0.06
l0.t I
r0.09
0.25
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
t0.00
9.94
9.97
6.72
t0.00
0.00
0.06
0.01
10.1 5
10. t0l0.ll
l4:13
l4:14
l4:15
l4: l6
l4:l'l
l4:18
l4:19
l4:20
l4:21
l4:22
l4:23
l4:24
l4:25
l4:26
l4:21
l4:28
14.29
l4:30
l4:31
l4:l?
l4:31
l4:34
l4:35
l4:36
l4:17
l4:3E
l4:39
l4:40
l4:41
l4:42
l4:43
l.4144
l4:45
14.46
l4:41
l4:48
l4:49
l4:50
l4:51
l4:52
l4:53
l4:54
l4:55
l4:56
l4:57
l4:58
l4:59
l5:00
l5:01
I5:02
l5:03
l5:O4
l5:05
l5:06
l5:07
l5:08
l5:09
l5:10
l5:l I
l5:12
421
4.22
4.23
4.25
4.33
4.30
4.23
4.t7
4.21
4.2?
4.2i
425
4.25
4.24
4.26
4.21
4.27
4.28
430
4.3 t
4.1I
4.29
4.28
4.29
4.29
4.29
4.3 |
4.10
4.32
4.31
4.30
4.30
4.31
4.10
4.1I
4.29
4.29
4.10
4.1I
4.12
4.ll
4.32
4.13
4.)2
4.31
4.13
4.14
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.36
4.31
4.37
4.17
4.18
4.31
4.18
4.17
9.82
9.84
9.84
9.81
9.7t
9.8t
9.t5
9.t8
9.86
9.86
9.85
9.84
9.84
9.85
9.84
9.t5
9.85
9.85
9.85
9.84
9.85
9.86
9.86
9.86
9.t5
9.86
9.84
9.86
9.t5
9.t6
9.86
9.85
9.86
9.85
9.86
9.85
9t7
9.8?
9.87
9.86
9.86
9.87
9.t7
9.81
9.88
9.87
9.t6
9.87
9.86
9.87
9.86
9.86
9.86
9.86
9.86
9.t5
9.84
9.85
9.86
9.E6
0.42
0.2t
0.25
0.08
0.26
0.25
0.26
0.27
0.79
0.56
0.59
0.40
0.20
0.26
0.03
0. l9
0.21
0.09
0.tI
0.23
0.31
0. l9
0.12
0.17
0.02
0.06
0.21
0.39
0.32
0.54
0.06
0.t 3
0.t6
o.25
0.lt
0.23
0.4t
0.36
0.t4
0.17
0.06
0.21
0.17
0.23
0.15
0.40
0.38
0.33
0.29
0. l7
0.03
0.08
0.34
0.09
0.63
0.33
0.28
0.24
6.92
7.33
7.03
6.99
6.90
6.9r
6.90
6.91
7.00
6.95
6.t7
6.96
6.94
6.91
6.89
6.89
6.92
6.85
6.85
6.82
6.82
6.t4
6.t4
6.84
6.86
6.81
6.84
6.80
6.80
6.84
6.t6
6.85
6.85
6.86
6.87
6.85
6.90
6.t2
6.79
6.81
6.82
6.82
6.79
6.82
6.75
6.lt
6.22
6.24
6.2.4
6.2t
6.24
6.21
6.24
6.23
(,.23
6.24
6.25
6.25
6.26
6.24
33 of6l
Altrlrcei\ L al i--'
Run3-RMData
Loc.don: Jacok Enrinccrinr - Hill Air Forcc Bec. UT
Soufte: Boilcr #2
Prcj.ct No.: AST-2025-01 87
Drte: l/
COr - Outl.l CO - Outlcl NOr - Ourlctohdty ppmvd ppmvd
0Uocorrectcd Rutr Avc..g. (Cd)
C.l C.s Concetrtrrllon (C[^)
Prctcla Syil.f, Zeru R6poM
Porttait Syttem 24rc Retpons
Avcrrge Zcre Re.ponse (Co)
Prctst Sy.t.m Crl Rdponie
Poiilell Syilcm Crl Rdpoil€
Avcr.ge C.l RespoBe (CM)
I 5:35
l5rl6
l5:17
I 5:18
l5:19
l5:40
l5i4l
l5:42
| 5r43
15,44
I 5i45
I 5146
15.47
15i48
l5:49
| 5:50
l5:51
I 5:52
I 5:53
l5:54
I 5:55
I 5:56
l5:57
l5:58
l5:59
l6ioo
l6:01
l6:02
l6:01
l6:04
l6:05
l6:06
I 6:0?
I6:08
l6:09
I6rl0
l6:ll
l6:12
l6:13
l6:14
l6:15
l6:16
l6:17
l6:18
l6:19
l6:20
l6:21
l6:22
l6:23
l6:24
l6:25
l6:26
l6:21
16r28
l6:29
I6rl0
l6:ll
l6:32
l6rl3
l6:34
Tioe
Unlt
(), - Outlct
"/. dry
4.45
t0.00
0.57
0.52
0.55
r0.00
t0.20
10.10
40s
4.42
4.46
4.44
4.4)
4.45
4.41
4.44
4.45
4.45
4.46
4.46
4.45
4.45
4.47
4.45
4.46
4.46
4.46
4.46
4.48
4.45
4.47
4.48
4.48
4.41
4.47
4.45
4.46
4.48
4.45
4.41
4.47
4.44
4.46
4.41
4.41
4.45
444
4.45
4.41
4.46
4.47
4.46
4.41
4.46
4.44
4.46
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.45
4.44
4.44
444
4.41
4.44
4.45
4.41
4.41
4.44
6.21
6.10
6.29
6.29
6.26
6.28
6.77
6.29
6.25
6.3 I
6.21
6.21
6.28
6.29
6.26
6.25
625
6.1 I
6.26
6.25
6.22
6.25
6.26
6.23
6.24
6.24
6.25
6.29
628
6.26
6.26
6.24
6.27
6.27
6.28
6.26
6.24
628
6lo
6.30
6.29
6.10
6.21
630
5.3 t
6.30
6.32
6.10
6.32
6.32
6.1I
6.1I
6.t2
6.32
6.31
6.ll
6.31
6.31
6.14
6.3 t
9.65
t0.t0
0.00
0.05
0.03
l0.l I
IO, I]
10.t2
961
9.62
9.62
9.62
9.62
9.62.
9.62
9.63
9.61
9.62
9.62
9.62
9.63
9.64
L64
9.65
9.64
9.64
9.(ff
9.64
9.64
9.65
9.65
9.65
9.65
9.65
9.65
9.65
9.65
9.65
9.66
9.66
9.65
9.66
9.65
9.65
9.65
9.66
9.67
9.66
9.65
9.66
9.66
9.66
9.66
9.66
9.67
9.61
9.66
9.66
9.66
9.66
9.61
9.67
9.67
9.61
9.67
9.61
9.61
9.67
9.61
I0.00
0.00
0.fi)
0.00
9.94
9.95
9.95
0 r0
0.04
0.05
0. t0
0.04
0.05
0 t9
0.2 t
0.M
0.3 t
0.38
0.05
0.t2
0.t9
0.37
0.2 t
0.35
0.t5
0.04
0.01
0.04
0. t4
0.12
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.t I
0.00
0 t4
021
0.09
0.29
0.M
0.04
0.04
0. t2
0.06
0.00
0.27
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.05
o.24
0.06
0.00
00t
0.04
0.08
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.06
0. t0
0.21
0.03
t0.00
0.06
0.09
0.08
10.10
I0.t9
10.15
616
34 of6l
Method I Data
- tlil Alr Ftr.. a.r. ljT
D.rc
AST-2029167
Ducl Orlcnlrdm: Vff
DElDdlSn: M
Dhl.nc. frm F.r W.ll lo Outrldc ot Pod: 4 ln
NIPPI€ l,.nBh: m lo
lkP.h of thr: ]s ln
Wdt of DGr: 41tr h
Cr6! $ctlm.l Arer of Ducl: ffi ir
Equlv.lctrtDhn.t.r: il ln
Na ofTerr Pat: l
Nu6hr of Rc.dlr8r tsr Pohl: I
DilitDc. : m t
Dlrl.me A Dftl Dl.meteri: il (mril be >0.5)
Di.l.rcc l: 4m ft
Dltl.m. B Dui Dt.met.rr: lI (muri b. > 2)
Yiolnon Nrdr of Trrvcr Pdtrbr n
Aclo.l Nrmbcr ofTrrv.rrc Polnlr: h
M.r3orer 0nurir rnd D.rtt,_Ully_
Reil.i.r (lnltl.l md ht ): ATM
I'
I'
I,OCATION OF TRAVf,RSf, MIMS
Ntrb<. oftnv.^. poitus o, . db;d.r
I
-!
1
3
6
1
t
t0
il
l,
,5 1 t t0 ll l2
t4.6 67 44 l.l :.6 2l
85.4 25.0 14.6 .. l0 5 E: 61
75.0 19.6 194 . 14.6 . ll.E
91 1 704 ll.1 :2.6 11 1
E54 611 .- t4.t lJo
95.6 E0.6 65.8 15.6.. 89 5 11.4 64-4
96 8 E5.4 75.0
9t8 .. Ell
97-1 EE.:
9t.l
q7a
'P.n.nt ofild t ltuaetd lrod otid! ayill k, nav^., rtat
'/. ot Dbbnc.
r.ll
I
2
l
4
5
6
1
E
9
l0
ll
t.2
10.5
I9.4
ll. l
80.6
89.5
t. tl
il.l t
13.70
28.1t
lt.l3
tt 88
t I/8
l0 I t/16
t3 r l/t6
tE 5/ I6
l0ll/16
l5 l/16
t8 5/t6
$ 7t8
Srak Dilgram
A 10ft
B.{R
Dqrh otDucr - 15 in
( kis Sdinn,l lrci
Dliturb.ne
aaaaaaoa
Uprira.m
35 of6l
Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Jacobs Enqineerinq - Hill Air Force Base, UT
Source Boiler #2
Project No. AST-2025-0187
Date lll5l25
Sample Poinl Angle (AP=0)
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
il
t2
l3
l4
t5
16
Averase
5
5
5
t0
l0
5
5
r0
l0
5
5
5
l0
5
5
l0
6.9
36 of6l
AlArce Field Data
Method 2 Data
Location Jacobs Ensineerins - Hill Air Force Bese. UT
Source Boiler #2
Project No. AST-2025-0187
Run No
Dsir
Statul
Strrt Tim(
Stop Timr
Leek Checl
I
I il 5/25
VALID
l2:46
l3:46
Pass
)
vt5t25
VALID
l4:13
l 5:13
Pass
3
vt5t25
VALID
l5:36
l6:36
Pass
A
Traverse Point AP
(in. wC)
Ts
(.F)
AP
(in. WC)
Ts
fF)
AP
(in. WC)
Ts
(oF)
I
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
I
)
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.21
0.1 8
0. l9
0.21
0.22
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.20
0. t9
0.?2
0.26
0.25
0.21t
0.24
0.25
255
264
263
265
266
265
266
267
266
269
268
266
264
268
267
269
0.27
0. I9
0.20
0.23
0.22
0.20
0.21
0.22
0.23
0.20
0.lr,r
0.24
0.25
0.23
0.22
0.25
261
261
1Aa
264
265
266
266
266
267
268
268
268
269
269
268
268
0.22
0.24
0. t9
0. l8
0. l9
0.20
0.21
0.22
0.23
0. l9
0.24
0.28
0.24
0.22
0.21
o.20
26tt
26tt
268
26tl
268
267
267
267
266
266
265
265
265
266
266
266
Square Rool of AP, (in. WC)r/2 (AP)t"
Average AP, in. WC (AP)
Pitot Tube Coefficieni (Cp)
Barometric Pressure. in. Hg (Pb)
Stltic Pressure, in. WC (PS)
Stack Pressure, in. Hg (Ps)
Average Tempcrrture, oF (Ts)
Average Temperature, oR (Ts)
MeasuredMoistureFraction (BWSmsd)
Moisture Frrction (q) Saturation (BWSsat)
Moisture Fraction (BWS)
02 Concentralion, To (O2)
CO2 Concentration, To (CO2)
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-'mole (dry) (Md)
Molecular Weight, lbnb-mole (wet) (Ms)
Velocity, ftlsec (Vs)
VFR et strckconditions, acfm (Qt)
VFR at standard conditions, scfh (Qsw)
VFR st standard conditions, scfm (Qsw)
VFR rt strndard conditions. dscfm (Osd)
0.472
0.22
0.tt40
25.28
0.01
25.2tr
265.5
725.2
0.163
1.000
0.163
9.9
29.75
27.84
34.4
l 3.799
509,030
8,484
7,099
0.467
0.22
0.840
25.28
0.01
25.211
266.0
725.7
0.t66
1.000
0.t66
4.1
9.9
29.15
27.80
34.0
l3.64ti
503,r I9
8,385
6 001
0.464
0.22
0.840
25.28
0.01
25.2t1
266.6
726.3
0.164
1.000
0.t#
4.1
9.6
29.70
?7.79
33.9
13,591
500,569
[t.343
6.976
0.461t
0.22
0.840
25.28
0.0 t
25.28
266.0
725.7
0.164
t.000
0.164
4.1
9.8
29.73
27.81
34. I
I 3,6?9
504,235
8,404
7.023
37 of 61
FIAAI
- Hlll Air Forcc 8.te. Ul
Souaca
ProJecr No.
Coltol. UEl6 / Mdhod
Method 4 Dila
lutr No.
,rtc
italut
itril Tlmc
iDd Tlmc
lID TImq mlo (0)
,lctcr lD
I
l/l 5/25
VALID
l2:46
13i46
60
2
I
^5t25VALID
l4:ll
l5rll
60
M5-24
3
vt5/25
VALID
15r36
I 6:36
50
M5-24
{d.r Coretloo Fdor (Y)
)rlflcc Crllbrrtlotr V.luc (AH (a)
4u vrculm, ln. HB
0.995
t.969
l
0.ml
0.s5
t.969
l
0.m2
0.995
t.969
3
vlcacr Volum!. ft3
0
5
t0
l5
20
25
30
35
40
15
50
55
60
lot.l Metcr Volumq fl3
55?.9fl I
56t.561t
565. I6-l
568.650
572.100
576.05 I
579921
581.890
587.601
59t.172
595.086
598.821
602 800
44 8t9
601.0t 4
ffi 7t6
6t0.486
614. I l5
6l 7.82tr
62l.l2l
624.811
628.426
612.t19
615.992
539.785
641.6t9
648. t09
45.095
64t.285
lt52.0l 2
655.813
659.5t3
It62.%t
666.592
tt?0.284
613.975
611.715
6il.579
685.485
689.268
693.176
45.09t
[aEpcrrlurq
0
5
l0
l5
20
15
30
35
,40
45
5{t
55
60
\v.n8e TeDpcrttur., oF (TE)
lv.ng. Temprntur.,'R Om)
vllnlmum Temp.rrturq oF
Mdar
5l
53
54
54
55
55
56
51
51
58
58
59
59
56
516
53
59
Probe Fllter 6p. Erlt
:18
38
19
40
4l
4l
42
42
43
44
44
45
45
47
t8
45
Mater
68
68
69
70
70
7t
'71
69
528
65
1t
Prob.Fllt.r IuB lDp. Ertt
42
42
43
45
41
48
48
49
50
50
5l
5t
41
42
st
Malar
't2
12
7l
13
'74
'14
75
11
77
78
78
78
75
535
12
7t
Proba Flltar Imp, Erl
47
47
48
48
49
49
50
50
5t
52
52
5l
54
50
41
).mm.trlc P.dur.,lr. HE (Pb)
{et€r Orlllcc Pr€.rur., ln. wC (aH)
,lder PrEr.urc, h. Hg (Pm)
itrDdrrd Meler Volunc. ft3 (Vm.td)
25.18
L850
15.4?
25.2r
r.850
25.42
tn 076
25.28
1.850
25.42
31.fi2
\r.ly.h TyD€
Eplrgd l. Pr.r'Pdt Tetr. I
nplng.r 2, Pr./Po.l Terl, g
mpltrB.r 3, Pr.y'Po.l Tetl. g
npltrt.r a, Pr.r'Po.t Tdl, I/oluneW.t r Collected, mL (Vlc)
itrtrdrrd W.ter Volrme, ,t (Vwrtd)
,lolrauft Fr.dloo Mc.rurcd (8wS)
;rt Mol8uhr Wellht,lbnb.'mol€ (dry) (Md)
mM Crllbildon Ct..t V.lrG lYorl
Gravimctric Gravim.ric
H20
H2C)
Empty
689.4
111.9
641.7
810.2
124.9
u5.4
140 I
7.0
H2C)
H2()
E*pty
703. I
709.9
641.6
914 t
848.7
1t4.1
644.9
t45.6
4.2
t.l
91
H20
H20
Empty
137.4
724.9
645.4
9r1 0
880.8
728.4
646.4oll 1
t4t.4
3.5
t.0tt
t60.1
7.560
0.16:l
29.15
-1.6
t60.8
7.58:]
O,Iffi
29.75
1)
156.2
1.166
0.1 64
29.10
lg
38 of6l
pllterrpe
Location
Source
Project No.
Jacobs Engineering - Hill Air Force Base, UT
QA Data
Boiler #l
AST-2025-0187
Parameter Oz - Outlet COr - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Oneratins Ranse
Servomex
1440
1420c-2
25
Servomex
1440
l4l5c-6
25
Thermo
48i
1028144972
r 000
Thermo
42i
1417161680
500
Cylinder ID
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
RR03646
cc73t666
NA
NA
RR03646
cc13t666
NA
NA
cct27394
cct27394
NA
NA
EB0089638
EB0089638
Cylinder Certi{ied Values
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
10.87
23.88
NA
NA
t0.92
24.0
NA
NA
500.2
500.2
NA
NA
2tl
2tt
Cylinder Expiration Date
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
2124t32
716132
NA
NA
2124132
7t6t32
NA
NA
2t13t3t
2il3t31
NA
NA
8t9t29
819t29
Tvoe of Samole Line Heated Sample Line
40 of6l
Calibration Data
Location: Jacobs Ensineerine - tlill Air Force Base, UT
Source: Boiler #l
Project No.: AST-2025-0187
Date':, lll4l25
Parameter Oz - Outlet CO, - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
f xoected Averase Concentration 5.00 10.00 10.00 12.00
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Soan
5.00
25.00
23.88
10.00
s0.00
24.00
10.00
50.00
20.00
r 2.00
60.00
20.00
Low Range Gas
Low
Hiph
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
9.55
14.33
9.60
14.40
8.00
12.00
8.00
12.00
High Range Gas
Low
Hiph
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (% or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hieh
0.00
NA
r 0.00
23.88
0.00
NA
10. l0
24.00
0.00
NA
10.00
20.00
0.00
NA
10.00
20.00
Upscale Calibration Gas (Crn)Mid Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
10.04
23.88
0.00
NA
10.09
24.01
0.00
NA
9.98
20.0r
0.00
NA
9.62
r 9.99
Performance (%o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hiph
0.00
NA
0.17
0.00
0.00
NA
0.04
0.04
0.00
NA
0.10
0.05
0.00
NA
L90
0.05
Status
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
4l of6l
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: Jacobs Engineering - Hill Air Force Base, UT
Source: Boiler#l
Project No.: AST-202J-01 87
Parameter Or - Outlet COr - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run I Date lll4l25
Span Value
Initial Instrum ent Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale ResDonse
23.88
0.00
10.04
0.26
0.00
l0.ll
10.09
24.00
0.00
10.09
0.00
0.00
l0.l I
10. l4
20.00
0.00
9.98
0.00
0.00
9.96
10.04
20.00
0.00
9.62
0.00
0.01
9.99
9.96
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
1.09
0.00
0.29
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.21
0.00
0.00
-0.10
0.30
0.00
0.05
1.85
1.70
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
-l.09
-0.08
0.00
0. l3
0.00
0.40
0.05
-0.15
Run 2 Date lll4l25
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
23.88
0.00
10.04
0.00
0.01
10.09
10. l0
24.00
0.00
10.09
0.00
0.00
10. l4
10.12
20.00
0.00
9.98
0.00
0.00
r0.04
9.99
20.00
0.00
9.62
0.01
0.00
9.96
10.15
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Soan
0.00
0.04
0.2t
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.t2
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.05
0.05
0.00
1.70
2.65
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.04
0.04
0.00
-0.08
0.00
-0.25
-0.05
0.95
Run 3 Date lll4l25
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
23.88
0.00
10.04
0.01
0.07
10. l0
r0.10
24.00
0.00
10.09
0.00
0.00
10.12
10.07
20.00
0.00
9.98
0.00
0.00
9.99
9.85
20.00
0.00
9.62
0.00
0.25
10.15
r 0.01
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest SDan
0.04
0.29
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.t2
-0.08
0.00
0.00
0.05
-0.65
0.00
1.25
2.65
1.95
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.25
0.00
0.00
-0.21
0.00
-0.70
1.25
-0.70
42 of 6l
QA Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Jacobs Engineering - Hill Air Force Base, UT
Boiler #2
AST-2025-0187
7*ro
Low
Mid
Certified Values
Z*ro
Low
Mid
Expiration Date
Z.ero
Low
Mid
43 of6l
Allatpe Calibration Data
Source: Boiler #2
Project No.: AST-2025-0187
Date: lll5/25
Parameter Oz - Outlet COz - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Exoected Average Concentration r0.00 10.00 20.00 20.00
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Snan
10.00
50.00
23.88
10.00
s0.00
24.00
20.00
100.00
20.00
20.00
100.00
20.00
Low Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
9.s5
14.33
9.60
14.40
8.00
12.00
8.00
12.00
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (% or ppm)
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
10.00
23.88
0.00
NA
10.10
24.00
0.00
NA
r 0.00
20.00
0.00
NA
t0.00
20.00
Upscale Calibration Gas (Csa)Mid Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
0.03
NA
10.16
23.80
0.00
NA
10.23
23.92
0.00
NA
10.01
20.06
0.08
NA
10.22
20.04
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
0.13
NA
0.67
0.34
0.00
NA
0.54
0.33
0.00
NA
0.05
0.30
0.40
NA
l.l0
0.20
Status
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
f*-t'Allalrce Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: Jacobs Engineerine - Hill Air Force Base, UT
Source: Boiler #2
Project No.: AST-2025-01 87
Parameter O: - Outlet CO: - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run I Date lll5l25
Span Value
Initial lnstrument Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Responsc
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Response
23.88
0.03
10.l6
0.14
0. l6
10.00
10.09
24.00
0.00
10.23
0.00
0.00
10.22
10.06
20.00
0.00
10.01
0.00
0.00
9.99
10.00
20.00
0.08
t0.22
0.00
0.00
10. l3
10. l5
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.46
0.54
-0.67
-0.29
0.00
0.00
-0.04
-0.71
0.00
0.00
-0.10
-0.05
-0.40
-0.40
-0.45
-0.35
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.08
0.38
0.00
-0.67
0.00
0.05
0.00
0. l0
Run )Date lll5l25
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
23.88
0.03
10.r6
0.l6
0.57
10.09
10.00
24.00
0.00
10.23
0.00
0.00
10.06
l0.l 1
20.00
0.00
10.01
0.00
0.00
10.00
9.94
20.00
0.08
10.22
0.00
0.06
10.15
10.10
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.54
2.26
-0.29
-0.67
0.00
0.00
-0.71
-0.50
0.00
0.00
-0.05
-0.35
-0.40
-0. l0
-0.35
-0.60
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
t.'72
-0.38
0.00
0.21
0.00
-0.30
0.30
-0.25
Run 3 Date lll5l25
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
23.88
0.03
10.t6
0.57
0.52
10.00
10.20
24.00
0.00
10.23
0.00
0.05
l0.l I
10.r3
20.00
0.00
10.01
0.00
0.00
9.94
9.95
20.00
0.08
10.22
0.06
0.09
r0.10
10. l9
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
2.26
2.0s
-0.6'7
0.17
0.00
0.21
-0.50
-0.42
0.00
0.00
-0.3s
-0.30
-0.10
0.05
-0.60
-0. 15
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
-0.2t
0.84
0.21
0.08
0.00
0.05
0.l5
0.45
45 ol6l
&*PJ!l--^.
Accreditation ,627&{
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shrevepo(, LA 71107
800-551€150
PGVP Vendor lD #G12024
EPA PROTOCOL GAS GERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cyllnder Pressuro:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
1c731666
127907
1900 PS|G
:C731655 7r)74rJ7fl1-O
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
07t0812024
07t06t2032
- Shreveoort - LA
=c731666.20240701198863026
This calibration standard has been certifaed per the -1
ino procedure G2
SMART-CERT
Unc.rtrlnty An idc.l Prlncld.4..ry.d On
71-F-31
cc738420.20230109
EBOO22009 20201022
20.753 0/o
't2.o03 %
24.76 0/.
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibrationnest was pertormed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational Sysiem of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specilied or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
faclor of k=2 to apprcximate the 9570 confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
A*M^* l+^'oilq-
Hayden Hartley
Analy3t
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J. Revi3ed on 201&09-17
46 of6l
Di*i'..--:..' .'
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-sst{'ts0
PGVP Vendor lD # G12024
?JI,JI
Accreditation #62754
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylindor Number:
Product lD Numbor:
Cyllnder Pressure:
coA#
Customer PO. NO.:
Customor:
tR03646
175?7',l
1900 PstG
iR03646.2024021 5-O
Cortification Oate:
Erpiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Numbor:
Tracking Number:
Provious Certificauon Dates:
02t26t2024
o2t24t2032
- Shreveoort - LA
1R03646.2024021 5
107553552
calibration standard has been certified per 12t531,
procedure G1.
I
Certified Concentration(s)
Consrntregonffi
10.87 olo
Unc.rt.lnv
ro3s %
*0.04 o/o
Anrlydcd Prlncld.ffi-
MPA
&rl}ldorr
02n6n021
o2r2wo24
Balance
SMART.CERT
20 01 o/o
15 01 0/o
11.92 o/o
Analytical lnstrumentation
c02 FTIR
Thomo
MKS
4 10i
MKS 2031OJG2EKVS13T
1 1629E0025 02t19t2024
o1714U67 01t31t2024
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
c€libration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Techndogy (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stiated is a comparison of the
measurement parameiers to the specitied or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approxamate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certilicate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, withoul written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon requesl and were taken into ac€ounl
when determining pass or fail.
,/'z t i li,,,
Timothy Oavir
Analytlcel Chomist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Vorsion 02-J, Rovised on 201&0+1 7
47 ol 6l
Airgas
an Air Liquide company
Airgas Spccialty Gases
Airgas USA LL
S2S North Industrial loop Road
Tooele, UT 84o74
Airgas.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Part Number:
Grade of Product:
E02N199E15A3168
EPA PROTOCOL STAIYDARD
Reference Number: 153-402661 012-1
Cylinder Volume: 144.0 CF
Cylinder Pressure: 2015 PSIG
Valve OuUet: 350
Certiflcation Date: Feb 13,2O23
Cylinder Number: CC127394
Laboratory:124 - Tooele (SAP) - UT
PGVP Number: 872023
Gas Code:CO,BALN
Expiration Date: Feb 13,2031
Certiricatbn perlomed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol tor As6ay Bnd Certifcation of Gasgous Calibration Standards (May 2012I &cumcnt EpA
uncartainty as statd b€low wlh a confidence level crf 95o/o- There are no sgnificanl irnpurite3 whidl afiod ths usc of this Glibration mixture. All concentrationg are on amolg/mole basia unless otherws€ noted. The Esults relate only to the iErns te8ted. The repod shalt not be reprodud oxcepr in fult without appoval ot u|e taboratory. Do
Not Use This below 100 psiq. i.e.0.7
Triad Data Availablc Upon Request
Reguested
Concentntion
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Actual PrctocolConcentration Method
CARBON MONOXIDE 500.0 PPM 500.2 PPM Gl +t- O.?oh NIST Traceablc 02t13t2023
CALI BRATION STA}IDARDS
Lot lD cylinder No concentration Uncertainty Erpiration Date
NTRM 15060535 CO{50676 491.9 PPM CARBON MONOXIDE/NITROGEN 0.60/6 Mat 05,2027
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Nicolet iS50 AUP2A10228 CO MCO FTIR Feb 01,2023
Airgas
an Air Liquide company
Airigas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA LLC
127225. Wentworth Ave.
Chicago, IL 60628
Airgas.com
54403182577-1
112.0 CF
1525 PS|G
660
Customer:
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:
Laboratory:
Analysis Date:
Lot Number:
CERTIFICATE OF AI{ALYSIS
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Expiration Date: Oct 31 ,2027
Product composition verified by direct comparison to calibration standards traceable to N.I.S.T. weights and/or N.LS.T.
Gas Mixture reference materials.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Req Conc Actual Concentration
(Mote %)
Grade of Product: CERTIFIED STANDARD-SPEC
AVON PROTECTION,
x02At99C15A0081
E80089638
124 - Chicago (SAP) - lL
Oct 31 ,2024
54403182577-1
Component Analytica!
Uncertainty
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
AIR
6500 PPM
Balance
6197 PPM +l- 2o/o
Sionature on file
Approved for Release
49 of6l
Page 1 of 1
t**AlAlEe M205 QA Data
Lmatlon: Jacobs
Source: Boilcr #2
- I lill Air ljorcc Basc. UT
Projst No.: A
Datc l/l
vlcthod Crltcrlr t.]PA
larsmetcr o?
M.k(
Modcl
s/t\
Sper
5CNOmCX
t440
r420c-2
24.0
lYllndcr Numbcr lD'l*ro
Mid
Hldh
NA
RR03646
cc73 I 666
lvlinder Ccrtlficd Valus
IEJO
Mid
0.0
I 0.Ii7
tl.lt8
trstrumctri R6mnsc (7. or DDtr
'laao
Mid
Hish
0.01
I l.ti6
21 87
rn (;rs Selmtlon {"/6 of SDan}
Mtd
Hieh
45.3
sss
}libretion Error Pcrformsncc (yo of Spsn)
4ro
Mid
Hioh
v,l
4.1
0.0
v (7o of Rsncc)4l
Analyzcr Makc:
Analyzcr Modcl:
Analyzcr SN:
!,nvironics lD:
Componcnt/Balancc Cas:
Cylindcr Cas ID (Dilurion)l
1420c-2
-
cc73 I 656
Cylindcr Gas Conccntration (Dilution), %: 23.81i
Cylindcr Gas lD (Mid-trvcl): RR03646
Cylindcr (ias Conccntration (Mid-Lcvcl). 70
Environics Units havc 2- I 0L Mass I'low ConlrollcB. l'or thesc unis thc 90"h (q) Tlpm and L0"h (4. Tlpm
Atrrlyur
Concentrrtioo
Inistlotr I
Error( t2%\
lnjstior 2
Error
I + 2./.r
Injstioo 3
Error( + 2./.\
I o. t"/n -0.1%
L tttr 0.0?o O.l"/o 0.0%
4.tt2 0.2%02%-o.4%
4 -o a.v"I Oo/"-0 '70/"
not bc conductcd.
T8r8ct Msss Flow
Tqrget
Dilution
Trrgct Flot
Rste
'l'arget
Conccntrstlotr
Actusl
Concentrstion
Arslyar
Conccntration
Analy4r
Conccntration
lo/^\
Analyar
Concentration
AVeraSc
Atrrl).ar
Concentratlotr
lo/^\
Diffcrencc
to/^\
Avcrrge Error
( * 2./.r
T}U5L 6U.0 ).0 Lt I st ts I oo?o tn/"
OU)L 50.0 50 Il9 ll g II ll9 ll9 I I tttt -o.02 -o to/"
IOt ./l L 200 4.O 4.1{4.1(4.t{4.X 4.tr 4.42 lt.o2 11.4"/o
t0l_/lt.t0.0 4.U 2.4 !.4 2 2.43 0.03
MId-Lcvcl (lss Cillbrf,tlon Dlrrct to
LaltDrrnon
Cas
Conccntrstion
lnjNtion I
Atralyar
Conccntrstlon
lnjstior 2
Atrillzer
Concenlration
Injstioo 3
Anrlyar
Conccntrrtiotr
Avcrsgc
Anslyar
Concentratiotr Difrcrcncc
AverrSc
Error(+2%t
t0_9 2 t0.90 0.91 0.0 o.tvo
50 of6l
Aifme
-, I ' rr( '._
Mass Flow Contoller Calibration
Dtrument lE 620 009
Revrsior 224
Etf(t,ve Dat(12/16/22
lssurnq Depailment Teah Servres Paq(lofl
Dilution System Make:
Dilution System Model:
Diluton S)6Em S/N:
Calibration EquiprY€nt Make:
Calibration Equipmont Model:
Callbration Equipment SA:
Flow Cell S/N:
Flow Cell S/N:
Callbration Gas:
Barometrlc Pr6sure, mmHg:
Amb'€nt Temperature,'F:
Environrc5
4040
8412-42-21-2024
Ahcat Screntific
M-1OSL PD/5MM.D/5IV, IV.1 SLPM-D/5M
272121
272121
272120
Nitrogen
25 641
64.4
Mass Flow Controller lD
Size. ccm:
Make:
Model:
S/N:
#1
r0,000
Environics
FFC 202
626687006
#2
10,000
Environlcs
FFC 202
626687003
1,000
Environics
FFC 202
626583003
Set Flow True Flow Dlftrence
cdmin cdmin
Set Flow True Flow Difbrerre
cclmin cclmin
Set Flow True Flow Diftrcnce
cclmin cdmin
5%
10.4
20%
30%
40o/o
50%
60%
7A%
80%
90%
100%
500 493 1.4%
r,000 r,008 0 8%
2,000 2,039 2A%
3,000 3,061 20%
4,000 4,479 2 A%
s,000 5,093 19%
6,000 6,110 18%
7,000 7,134 1.9%
8,000 8,154 I 9%
9,000 9,183 20%
10,000 10,202 2.0%
500 491 1 8%
r,000 1,013 1.30k
2,000 2,041 2.1%
3,000 3,074 2 5%
4,000 4,105 26%
s,000 5,127 2 5%
6,000 6,143 2 4%
7,000 7,168 2A%
8,000 8,115 2.2%
9,000 9,190 21%
10.000 10.202 2.0%
50 49 2.2%
100 99 09%
200 200 0.0%
300 301 0 3%
400 402 0.6%
500 503 0 6%
600 605 0 8%
700 747 1.0%
800 809 1.2%
900 914 1.5%
1,000 1,019 1.9%
Note: The mass flow controller's calibration valuet are used by the dilution system s operating software to improve accuracy. These calibrations are not necessarily
indicative of the systems overall performance Performance is verified by conducting a Method 205 prior to each field use.
Calibratron Performed By iFI
Date 2/2112A24
5l of6l
A/lfarpe NOx Converter Check
Project No.: AST-2025-01 87
NO2 Converter Check - Outlet
ThermoAnalyzer Make
nalyzer Model 42i
I Number 1417161680
linder ID Number EB0100758
Exp. Date 10119126
linder Concentration, ppm 49.0
Pre-Test Concentration, ppm
Post-Test Date lll5/25 Time 17:03
Post-Test Concentration, ppm 48.33
Post-Test Elficiencv. 7o 99
Efficiency is > 90 %.
52 of 6l
&*"J!f,--.
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551€150
PGVP Vendor lD # G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cyllnder Number:
Product lO Number:
Cyllnder Prossure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Cuttom€r:
:80't00758
t24731
r900 PslG
:80100758.20231 003-0
Certification Oate:
Erpiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Provious Certiff cetion Dates:
10t2o/2023
10119t2026
snFvcndn - I A
EB01 00758.20231 003
095704E01
calibration standard has been certified per EPA-600/R-1 2y531,
procedure G1.
I
Certified Concentration(s)
Cmc.ndon Unc.ilrlnty An lytc.l Prlncld.enryrdorr
1}l|tr,na?f,,1onono23Nltnogcn Dlorlde 10.6 PPM FTIR
Balance
Analytical Meaaurement Data Availabl6 Online
SMART.CERT
96 4 PPM
62 4 PPM
c2190301.02
c2190301 02
MKS 2O3,ID.'G2EKVS13T
MKS 2031DJG2EKVS13T
0171{6467
o17',|16167
Thls is to certfy the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the deflned specmcations. This
calibration/test was performed usang Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement paramete6 to the specified or required calibration/testlng process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, lhe uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytic.l Chomist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Vs.sion 02-J. R.vised on 201&09-17
53 of6l
AI -*---IATrcE QA Data
Location Jacobs Engineering - Hill Air Force Base, UT
Source Boiler #l
Project No. AS!]2Q!:Q!!Z
P.rrmeter(s) VFR
Date Piror ID Evidence of Evidence of
mis-elisnment?
Calibration or
Pcnrir rannirorl
vt4/25 SLC-PR-3 no no no
Drte Probe or
Th--aaaa-nla Ih
Reference lndicated
TemD. (oF)Difference Criteria
I lt4/25 SLC-PR-3 250.0 250.0 0.lo/n 1 1.5 % (absolute)
Field Balance Check
Date 01fi3125
Balancc ID 5A2881017
Ccrtificd Wcight lD SLC.IKG.3
Ccrtificd Weight (g)r000.0
Mcasurcd Wcight (g)999.E
Wcight Diffcrencc (g)0.2
Dete Barometric
Pressure
Evidence of Reading Verified Calibration or
D6^ai, ,-ai.i,a/,Weather Strtion Location
I /',t 4125 Wcathcr Station NA NA NA SLC. UT
Drt€Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check
t fi4t25 N45-24 Pass
54 of6l
a'-.F
IATrcEAI QA Data
locrtion Jecobs Encineerins - Hill Air Force Base. UT
Source Boiler #2
Project No. AST-202$'0187
Parameter(s) fIB
Date Pitot ID Evidence of Evidence of Calibration or
Panoir raarrirarl
t/t5/25 SLC-PR-3 no no no
Drte Probe or
Thprmncorrnle lD
Reference Indicated
Temn^ (o$l Difference Criteria
1il 5t25 SLC-PR-3 250.0 250.0 0.0%j 1.5 o/o (absolute)
Field Balance Check
Dat€oytsl2s
Balancc ID sA288l0l7
Ccrtificd Wcight ID SLC.IKC-3
Ccrtificd Wcight (g)1000.0
Mcasurcd Weight (g)999.8
Wcight Diffcrcncc (g)0.2
I)sie Brrometric Evidence of
demeqe?Reeding Verified LAlrDraIron or
Panoir rcnrrircd"Werther Strtion Locrtion
Ut5125 Wcather Station NA NA NA SLC. UT
Dale Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check
ilt5t25 M5-24 Pass
55 of6l
,Aliarrce DGM Calibration-Orifices
Document lI 620.004
Revrs or 241
Fffe.trve Datr 9/26/24
lsrurng Depanment Te(h Sery (es Paqr lofl
Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter
Console lD. MS 24
Meter S/N: 22071030
Critical Orifice 5/N: VH 40-73
Calibration Detail
Equipment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor
Reference Calibrator Make
Reference Calibrator Model
Reference Calibrator S/N
Calibration Detail
Practical lnstrument Electronrcs
Piecal 5208
121645
Calibratron By
Calibration Date
Reviewed By
Xander Krahn
11/7 /2024
nitial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)
Final Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (PbF)
Averaqe Barometric Pressure, in Hq (Pb)
25 59
25 60
25.59
Critifcal Orifice lD (Y)
K' Factor, fttR'/'/ in. wC min (K')
Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg (Vp)
In(ial DGN,4 Volume, ftr (Vm,)
Final DGM Volume, ftr (VmF)
Total DG[/4 volume. ftr (Vm)
VH 73
0 7915
13.5
u6700
653 894
7194
VH,73 vFl-63
0 6091
t).)
662 600
668 965
6 365
VH-63 VH 55
0.4433
17 .5
677 500
686.167
8 667
VH 55
0.7915 0 609 0A43
135
654.700
661.890
7 190
15.5
670 400
676.7U
63U
17.5
686 s00
695 175
8 615
Ambient Temperature, 'F (Ia)
lnitial DGM Temperature, 'F (Tm)
Final DGM Temperature, 'F (Tmr)
Averaqe DGM Temperature, 'F ( Tm)
67
67
oo
68
68
68
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
70
70
Elapsed Time (O)
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (AH)
Standard Meter volume, ftr (Vmstd)
Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ftr (Vcr)
Meter Correction Factor (Y)
Tolerance
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @)
Tolerance
Orrfice Cal Check
700
310
6 2155
6.1786
0 994
0 00i
1.934
0 036
700
310
6 2003
6.1728
0 996
0 001
1 934
0 036
800
190
546/9
5 4237
0.992
0 002
1 996
0 027
800
1.90
5.4640
5.4237
0 993
0 002
1.996
o 027
15 00
100
7.4222
7.4013
0.997
0.002
1.979
0 009
15 00
1.00
7.4220
7.4013
0 997
0 002
1.977
0 007
024 4.47 047
Meter Corection Factor m 0.99s
f,rifice Calibration Value (AH @)'t.959
Positive Pressure Leak Check Yes
Re{erence Temp Display Temp Accuracy Absolute
Difference
,,F ts
0
68
100
464
528
560
0
66
98
460
526
558
0.0
04
0.4
0
2
2
223
248
273
683
708
133
))1
248
273
683
708
733
00
00
00
0
0
0
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,',I00
1,200
760
860
960
1,060
1,160
1,260
1,360
1,460
1,560
1,660
300
398
497
598
700
799
899
r,000
1,100
1,200
760
858
957
1,058
1,160
1,259
1,359
1,460
1,560
1,660
00
02
0.3
02
00
0.1
01
00
00
00
0
2
3
2
0
1
l
0
0
0
Personnel
Charles Horton
56 ol6l
trlarEeAI Stratification Check
Jacobs Engineering - Hill Air Force Base, UTLocation:
Source:
Project No.:
Boiler #l
AST-202s-0187
Date: lll4l2025
Traverse Point Time o2
("/"1
Coz
(o/"1
CO
(nnm)
NOx
(nnm)
A-l
2
J
4
5
6
I l:30
I l:32
I l:34
I l:36
I l:38
I l:40
3.97
3.90
3.92
3.96
3.97
3.99
l0.l I
10.16
10.l5
10. l4
10.12
l0.l I
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.22
8.47
8.44
8.41
8.35
8.33
B-l
2
3
4
5
6
I l:42
I l:44
I l:46
I l:48
I l:50
ll:52
3.98
4.02
4.00
3.98
4.03
4.01
10.12
10.10
t0.12
10. l4
l0.ll
10. l2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.3s
8.36
8.37
8.46
8.37
8.44
Average 4.0 l0. t 0.0 8.4
Criteria Met Srngle Pornt Srnsle Pornt Single Point srnsle Potnt
pultErrEe Stratification Check
Jacobs Engineering - Hill Air Force Base, UTLocation:
Source:
Project No.:
Boiler #2
AST-2025-0187
Datez 111512025
Traverse Point Time o2
(o/"1
Coz
("1
CO
(nnm)
NOx
(nnm)
A-l
2
3
l2:40
l2:42
l2:44
4.25
4.28
4.28
4.3
9.91
9.88
9.89
9.9
0.63
0.23
0.32
0.4
8.84
8.22
8.17
8.4Averase
Criteria Met Slngle Polnt )lngre rolnr Slngle Polnt Drngre rolnr
58 of6l
59 of6l
Process Data: Boiler Load and Fue[ Flow Data
Boiter 1
Run Load Fuet Ftow (scfh)
1 950/o 54,600
2 950/6 56,500
3 950/o 56,500
Boiler toad and fuet flow data from visuat
observations of the hoiter controt disptay
panet.
Boiter 2
Run Load Fuet Ftow (scfh)
1 950/o 49,400
2 9570 49,450
3 950/o 49,450
60 of6l
UTAH T)
ENVIRON
DEPARTMENT OF
NMENTAL QUALITY
ION OF AIR QUALITY
Boiler 1 NOX CO 2025
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Hill AFB
Company Contact:Erik Dettenmaier
Contact Phone No.[phone]
Stack Designation:Boiler 1
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:1/14/2025 &
Review Date: 3/14/2025
Observer:Paul Morris
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 0.7 2.2 0.447 0.000
ppm 9.0 8.373
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
35.00 6.681 0.9950 1.969 0.84 25.28 0.01
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:
8710

Round
Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
Boiler 1 NOX CO 2025
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Hill AFB
Boiler 1
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.011 0.000 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.0.45 0.00 CO2 O2
ppm or % 8.37 0.00 10.11 4.05
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.08E-02 0.00E+00 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.008E-06 0.000E+00
lbs./hr.0.45 0.00 10.09 3.97
ppm or %8.44 0.00 10.11 4.09
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.07E-02 0.00E+00 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 9.883E-07 0.000E+00
lbs./hr.0.44 0.00 10.09 4.09
ppm or %8.27 0.00 10.11 4.13 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.09E-02 0.00E+00 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.005E-06 0.000E+00
lbs./hr.0.45 0.00 10.17 4.10
ppm or %8.41 0.000 10.16 4.16 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
Boiler 1 NOX CO 2025
Calibration Error Test
Test Date January 14, 2025 O2
CS - Cal. Span 23.88
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
RR03646 02/24/32 Mid-level 10.00 10.04 0.04 0.17% Passed Cal.
CC731666 07/06/32 High-level 23.88 23.88 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 41.88%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date January 14, 2025 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
RR03646 02/24/32 Mid-level 10.10 10.09 0.01 0.042% Passed Cal.
CC731666 07/06/32 High-level 24.00 24.01 0.01 0.042% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 42.08%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date January 14, 2025 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 20.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
EB0089638 08/09/29 Mid-level 10.00 9.62 0.38 1.900% Passed Cal.
High-level 20.00 19.99 0.01 0.050% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date January 14, 2025 CO
2.18 CS - Cal. Span 20.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
CC127394 02/13/31 Mid-level 10.00 9.98 0.02 0.100% Passed Cal.
High-level 20.00 20.01 0.01 0.050% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Boiler 1 NOX CO 2025
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofHill AFB
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Boiler 1
CS Calibration Span 20.00 20.00 24.00 23.88
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 10.00 10.00 10.10 10.00
High-Level 20.00 20.00 24.00 23.88
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 42.1% 41.9%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 10.00 10.00 10.10 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 9.62 9.98 10.09 10.04High-Level 19.99 20.01 24.01 23.88
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 9.62 9.98 10.09 10.04
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 1.90% 0.10% 0.04% 0.17%
ppmdv Difference 0.38 0.02 0.01 0.04
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.05% 0.05% 0.04% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.01 0.01 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.09%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0 0 0 0.26
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 9.99 9.96 10.11 10.11
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.85% 0.10% 0.08% 0.29%
Difference TRUE 0.37 0.02 0.02 0.07
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/14/2025 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX8.4 0.00 10.1 4.1 CO
0.0% 42.1% 0.0% 42.1% 17.1% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.05% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 9.96 10.04 10.14 10.09
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.70% 0.30% 0.21% 0.21%
Difference TRUE 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.05% 0.00% 0.00% 1.09% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.15% 0.20% 0.13% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Boiler 1 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
6.681 25.28 0.01 25.28 290 10.09 3.97 85.94 29.77 27.88
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 4.6943
0.9950 0.84 44.905 157.70 52 38.916 7.423 0.1602 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs (ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat InputBtu/hr Low Mid High
0.5048 37.390 534,935 14,988 449,245.08 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.33 0.574 284 57 33 861 768 93.520.30 0.548 286 57 34 773 719 54.7
3 0.25 0.500 288 59 34 642 640 2
4 0.24 0.490 284 62 35 925 917 7.5
5 0.21 0.458 288 63 37
6 0.21 0.458 289 64 38
7 0.22 0.469 289 66 39
8 0.21 0.458 290 68 40
9 0.32 0.566 292 69 41
10 0.31 0.557 292 69 41
11 0.29 0.539 291 70 42
12 0.25 0.500 293 70 42
13 0.26 0.510 293 71 42
14 0.24 0.490 292
15 0.23 0.480 294
16 0.23 0.480 295
17
18
1920
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
Boiler 1 NOX CO 2025
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofHill AFB
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Boiler 1
CS Calibration Span 20.00 20.00 24.00 23.88
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Mid-Level 10.00 10.00 10.10 10.00
High-Level 20.00 20.00 24.00 23.88
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 42.1% 41.9%100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 10.00 10.00 10.10 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 9.62 9.98 10.09 10.04
High-Level 19.99 20.01 24.01 23.88
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 9.62 9.98 10.09 10.04
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 1.90% 0.10% 0.04% 0.17% ppmdv Difference 0.38 0.02 0.01 0.04
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.05% 0.05% 0.04% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.01 0.01 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.05% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.01 0 0 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 9.96 10.04 10.14 10.09
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.70% 0.30% 0.21% 0.21%
Difference TRUE 0.34 0.06 0.05 0.05
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/14/2025 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
8.3 0.00 10.1 4.1 CO
0.0% 41.6% 0.0% 42.2% 17.3% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 10.15 9.99 10.12 10.10
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 2.65% 0.05% 0.12% 0.25%
Difference TRUE 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.05% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.95% 0.25% 0.08% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Boiler 1 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
6.68 25.28 0.01 25.28 289 10.09 4.09 85.82 29.78 27.89
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 4.6396
0.9950 0.84 45.147 159.10 52 39.137 7.489 0.1606 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.5001 37.02 530,172 14,840 445,018.00 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final Vf Initial Vi
1 0.28 0.529 284 64 33 819 728 91
2 0.30 0.548 286 64 34 781 722 59.5
3 0.27 0.520 286 65 34 642 640 1.840.26 0.510 286 65 35 907 901 6.8
5 0.24 0.490 288 66 36
6 0.22 0.469 289 66 36
7 0.21 0.458 289 66 37
8 0.21 0.458 290 67 38
9 0.28 0.529 290 68 38
10 0.30 0.548 291 68 39
11 0.29 0.539 291 69 40
12 0.27 0.520 291 69 40
13 0.27 0.520 291 70 41
14 0.20 0.447 292
15 0.21 0.458 292
16 0.21 0.458 292
17
1819
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Boiler 1 NOX CO 2025
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofHill AFB
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Boiler 1
CS Calibration Span 20.00 20.00 24.00 23.88
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Mid-Level 10.00 10.00 10.10 10.00
High-Level 20.00 20.00 24.00 23.88
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 42.1% 41.9%100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 10.00 10.00 10.10 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 9.62 9.98 10.09 10.04
High-Level 19.99 20.01 24.01 23.88
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 9.62 9.98 10.09 10.04
Low-Level 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0 0 0 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 1.90% 0.10% 0.04% 0.17% ppmv Difference 0.38 0.02 0.01 0.04
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.05% 0.05% 0.04% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.01 0.01 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0 0 0 0.01
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 10.15 9.99 10.12 10.10
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 2.65% 0.05% 0.12% 0.25%
Difference TRUE 0.53 0.01 0.03 0.06
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/14/2025 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
8.5 0.00 10.2 4.2 CO
0.0% 42.5% 0.0% 42.3% 17.4% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.07 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 1.25% 0.00% 0.00% 0.29%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 10.01 9.85 10.07 10.10
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.95% 0.65% 0.08% 0.25%
Difference TRUE 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 1.25% 0.00% 0.00% 0.25% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.70% 0.60% 0.04% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Boiler 1 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
6.68 25.28 0.01 25.28 290 10.17 4.10 85.74 29.79 27.89
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 4.6669
0.9950 0.84 45.186 157.70 59 38.668 7.423 0.1610 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.5019 37.16 531,911 14,896 446,246.49 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final Vf Initial Vi
1 0.28 0.529 284 72 42 833 694 139.5
2 0.29 0.539 284 72 42 710 704 5.8
3 0.30 0.548 286 72 42 644 642 2.440.27 0.520 286 72 43 935 925 10
5 0.24 0.490 288 73 43
6 0.23 0.480 289 73 43
7 0.21 0.458 290 73 44
8 0.20 0.447 292 73 44
9 0.28 0.529 292 73 45
10 0.30 0.548 293 73 45
11 0.30 0.548 293 74 46
12 0.28 0.529 293 74 47
13 0.21 0.458 292 74 47
14 0.21 0.458 291
15 0.22 0.469 291
16 0.23 0.480 290
17
1819
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Boiler 2 NOX CO 2025
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Hill AFB
Company Contact:Erik Dettenmaier
Contact Phone No.[phone]
Stack Designation:Boiler 2
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:1/15/2025 &
Review Date: 3/14/2025
Observer:Paul Morris
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 0.7 2.2 0.348 0.009
ppm 9.0 6.883
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
35.00 6.681 0.9950 1.969 0.84 25.28 0.01
Contractor Information
Contact: Christopher N. Knott
Contracting Company: Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.
Address: 2730 Commercial Way Rock Springs, WY 82901
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:
8710

Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Round
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
Boiler 2 NOX CO 2025
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Hill AFB
Boiler 2
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.009 0.000 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.0.348 0.009 CO2 O2
ppm or % 6.88 0.29 9.78 4.15
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.03E-02 4.06E-04 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 9.389E-07 3.710E-08
lbs./hr.0.40 0.02 9.85 4.25
ppm or %7.86 0.51 9.89 4.34
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)8.57E-03 1.97E-04 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 7.916E-07 1.823E-08
lbs./hr.0.33 0.01 9.87 4.08
ppm or %6.63 0.25 9.89 4.30 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)7.98E-03 7.92E-05 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 7.360E-07 7.311E-09
lbs./hr.0.31 0.00 9.63 4.10
ppm or %6.16 0.101 9.65 4.45 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
Boiler 2 NOX CO 2025
Calibration Error Test
Test Date January 15, 2025 O2
CS - Cal. Span 23.88
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.13% Passed Cal.
RR03646 02/24/32 Mid-level 10.00 10.16 0.16 0.67% Passed Cal.
CC731666 07/06/32 High-level 23.88 23.80 0.08 0.34% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 41.88%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date January 15, 2025 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
RR03646 02/24/32 Mid-level 10.10 10.23 0.13 0.542% Passed Cal.
CC731666 07/06/32 High-level 24.00 23.92 0.08 0.333% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 42.08%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date January 15, 2025 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 20.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.400% Passed Cal.
EB0089638 08/09/29 Mid-level 10.00 10.22 0.22 1.100% Passed Cal.
High-level 20.00 20.04 0.04 0.200% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date January 15, 2025 CO
2.18 CS - Cal. Span 20.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
CC127394 02/13/31 Mid-level 10.00 10.01 0.01 0.050% Passed Cal.
High-level 20.00 20.06 0.06 0.300% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Boiler 2 NOX CO 2025
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofHill AFB
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Boiler 2
CS Calibration Span 20.00 20.00 24.00 23.88
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 10.00 10.00 10.10 10.00
High-Level 20.00 20.00 24.00 23.88
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 42.1% 41.9%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 10.00 10.00 10.10 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03
Mid-Level 10.22 10.01 10.23 10.16High-Level 20.04 20.06 23.92 23.80
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 10.22 10.01 10.23 10.16
Low-Level 0.40% 0.00% 0.00% 0.13%
ppmdv Difference 0.08 0 0 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 1.10% 0.05% 0.54% 0.67%
ppmdv Difference 0.22 0.01 0.13 0.16
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.20% 0.30% 0.33% 0.34%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.08
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.40% 0.00% 0.00% 0.46%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.08 0 0 0.11
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 10.13 9.99 10.22 10.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.45% 0.10% 0.04% 0.67%
Difference TRUE 0.09 0.02 0.01 0.16
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/15/2025 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX8.0 0.51 9.9 4.3 CO
0.0% 39.9% 2.6% 41.2% 18.2% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.40% 0.00% 0.00% 0.54%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 10.15 10.00 10.06 10.09
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.35% 0.05% 0.71% 0.29%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.08% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.10% 0.05% 0.67% 0.38%
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Boiler 2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
6.681 25.28 0.01 25.28 266 9.85 4.25 85.90 29.75 27.85
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 3.1570
0.9950 0.84 44.819 160.30 49 39.070 7.545 0.1619 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs (ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat InputBtu/hr Low Mid High
0.4722 34.420 509,073 13,798 426,673.04 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.21 0.458 255 53 38 830 689 140.820.18 0.424 264 53 38 725 718 7
3 0.19 0.436 263 54 39 645 643 2.2
4 0.21 0.458 265 54 40 923 913 10.3
5 0.22 0.469 266 55 41
6 0.23 0.480 265 55 41
7 0.22 0.469 266 56 42
8 0.23 0.480 267 57 42
9 0.20 0.447 266 57 43
10 0.19 0.436 269 58 44
11 0.22 0.469 268 58 44
12 0.26 0.510 266 59 45
13 0.25 0.500 264 59 45
14 0.28 0.529 268
15 0.24 0.490 267
16 0.25 0.500 269
17
18
1920
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
Boiler 2 NOX CO 2025
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofHill AFB
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Boiler 2
CS Calibration Span 20.00 20.00 24.00 23.88
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Mid-Level 10.00 10.00 10.10 10.00
High-Level 20.00 20.00 24.00 23.88
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 42.1% 41.9%100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 10.00 10.00 10.10 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03
Mid-Level 10.22 10.01 10.23 10.16
High-Level 20.04 20.06 23.92 23.80
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 10.22 10.01 10.23 10.16
Low-Level 0.40% 0.00% 0.00% 0.13%
ppmdv Difference 0.08 0 0 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 1.10% 0.05% 0.54% 0.67% ppmdv Difference 0.22 0.01 0.13 0.16
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.20% 0.30% 0.33% 0.34%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.08
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.40% 0.00% 0.00% 0.54%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.08 0 0 0.13
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 10.15 10.00 10.06 10.09
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.35% 0.05% 0.71% 0.29%
Difference TRUE 0.07 0.01 0.17 0.07
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/15/2025 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
6.7 0.25 9.9 4.3 CO
0.0% 33.6% 1.3% 41.0% 18.0% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.57 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.10% 0.00% 0.00% 2.26%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 10.10 9.94 10.11 10.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.60% 0.35% 0.50% 0.67%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.30% 0.00% 0.00% 1.72% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.25% 0.30% 0.21% 0.38%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Boiler 2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
6.68 25.28 0.01 25.28 266 9.87 4.08 86.05 29.74 27.82
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 3.1836
0.9950 0.84 45.095 160.80 58 38.648 7.569 0.1638 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.4666 34.04 503,107 13,645 420,713.63 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final Vf Initial Vi
1 0.22 0.469 261 66 42 849 703 145.6
2 0.19 0.436 261 66 42 714 710 4.2
3 0.20 0.447 262 67 43 645 644 1.340.23 0.480 264 67 44 944 935 9.7
5 0.22 0.469 265 68 45
6 0.20 0.447 266 68 47
7 0.21 0.458 266 69 48
8 0.22 0.469 266 69 48
9 0.23 0.480 267 69 49
10 0.20 0.447 268 70 50
11 0.18 0.424 268 70 50
12 0.24 0.490 268 71 51
13 0.25 0.500 269 71 51
14 0.23 0.480 269
15 0.22 0.469 268
16 0.25 0.500 268
17
1819
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Boiler 2 NOX CO 2025
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review ofHill AFB
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Boiler 2
CS Calibration Span 20.00 20.00 24.00 23.88
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Mid-Level 10.00 10.00 10.10 10.00
High-Level 20.00 20.00 24.00 23.88
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 42.1% 41.9%100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 10.00 10.00 10.10 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2Low-Level 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03
Mid-Level 10.22 10.01 10.23 10.16
High-Level 20.04 20.06 23.92 23.80
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 10.22 10.01 10.23 10.16
Low-Level 0.40% 0.00% 0.00% 0.13%
ppmv Difference 0.08 0 0 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 1.10% 0.05% 0.54% 0.67% ppmv Difference 0.22 0.01 0.13 0.16
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.20% 0.30% 0.33% 0.34%
ppmv Difference 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.08
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.57 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.10% 0.00% 0.00% 2.26%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.02 0 0 0.54
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 10.10 9.94 10.11 10.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.60% 0.35% 0.50% 0.67%
Difference TRUE 0.12 0.07 0.12 0.16
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/15/2025 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
6.3 0.10 9.7 4.5 CO
0.0% 31.4% 0.5% 40.2% 18.6% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.09 0.00 0.05 0.52 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.05% 0.00% 0.21% 2.05%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 10.19 9.95 10.13 10.20
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.15% 0.30% 0.42% 0.17%
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.05% 0.00% 0.21% 0.21% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.45% 0.05% 0.08% 0.50%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Boiler 2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
6.68 25.28 0.01 25.28 267 9.63 4.10 86.27 29.70 27.82
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 3.2171
0.9950 0.84 45.091 156.20 63 38.286 7.352 0.1611 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.4643 33.89 500,459 13,585 419,834.83 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final Vf Initial Vi
1 0.22 0.469 268 72 47 881 737 143.4
2 0.24 0.490 268 72 47 728 725 3.5
3 0.19 0.436 268 73 48 646 645 140.18 0.424 268 73 48 931 923 8.3
5 0.19 0.436 268 74 49
6 0.20 0.447 267 74 49
7 0.21 0.458 267 75 50
8 0.22 0.469 267 76 50
9 0.23 0.480 266 77 51
10 0.19 0.436 266 77 52
11 0.24 0.490 265 78 52
12 0.28 0.529 265 78 53
13 0.24 0.490 265 78 54
14 0.22 0.469 266
15 0.21 0.458 266
16 0.20 0.447 266
17
1819
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog