DDW-2025-002540

Drinking Water
Board Packet
June 25, 2024
Agenda

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144830 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4830
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone] www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

Drinking Water Board
Kristi Bell, Chair
Eric Franson, P.E., Vice-Chair
Dawn Ramsey
Justin Maughan
Corinna Harris
Jeff Coombs
Blake Tullis, Ph.D.
Kimberly D. Shelley
Shazelle Terry Nathan Lunstad
Executive Secretary

SPENCER J. COX
Governor

DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor
Department of
Environmental Quality

Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director

DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
Nathan Lunstad, P.E.
Director

DRINKING WATER BOARD MEETING
June 25, 2024, 1:00 PM
Via Zoom Webinar & In Person:
Multi-Agency State Office Building
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84116

Nathan Lunstad Cell # 385-239-5974

DRAFT AGENDA
1. Call to Order

2. Roll Call – Michael Grange

3. Approval of Meeting Minutes
A. April 30, 2024
B. May 24, 2024

4. Disclosure for Conflict of Interest

5. Directors Report – Michael Grange
A. Enforcement Report (Board Packet Item Only)
B. Other

6. Rural Water Association Report – Dale Pierson

7. Rule Making Activities - Michael Newberry, P.E.
A. Authorization to Adopt R309-515–5 and -6 Source Protection
B. Authorization to Adopt R309-600 Sewers in Source Protection Zones
C. Authorization to Adopt R309-540 Pump Rule

8. Financial Assistance Committee Report
A. Status Report – Wayne Boyce
B. Cashflow – Wayne Boyce
C. Project Priority List – Michael Grange
D. SRF Applications
i. Federal
a. Wanship Mutual Water Co. - Kjori Shelley
Page 2
b. Provo Water Users Association - Michael Grange
c. Summit Service Area #3 - Allyson Spevak
ii. State
a. Grantsville City - Cadence Hernandez
b. North Logan - Michael Grange
c. Deseret Oasis - Andrea Thurlow
iii. Additional Funds
a. Green Hills Country Estates - Heather Pattee
b. Foothill Water Users Association – Kjori Shelley
iv. Deauthorizations
a. Stockton - Heather Pattee
v. Extensions
a. Virgin Town - Allyson Spevak

9. Public Comment Period

10. Open Board Discussion

11. Next Board Meeting

Date: August 28, 2024
Time: 9:00 PM
Place: Davis Conference Center
1651 N 700 W
Layton, UT 84041

12. Adjourn

Agenda Item
3(A)
195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144830 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4830 Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone] www.deq.utah.gov Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

Drinking Water Board Kristi Bell, ChairEric Franson, P.E., Vice-ChairDawn RamseyJustin MaughanCorinna HarrisJeff CoombsBlake Tullis, Ph.D.Shazelle TerryKimberly D. ShelleyNathan Lunstad Executive Secretary
SPENCER J. COX Governor
DEIDRE HENDERSONLieutenant Governor
Department of
Environmental Quality
Kimberly D. ShelleyExecutive Director
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATERNathan Lunstad, P.E.Director
DRINKING WATER BOARD MEETING
April 30, 2024, 1:00 PM
Via Zoom Webinar & In Person: Multi-Agency State Office Building 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Nathan Lunstad Cell # 385-239-5974
DRAFT Minutes 1.Call to Order
Kristi Bell, Chair, called the Drinking Water Board (Board, DWB) meeting to order at 1:02 PM.
2.Roll Call – Nathan Lunstad
Board Members Present at Roll Call: Kristi Bell, Eric Franson, Dawn Ramsey, Kim Shelley, Jeff
Coombs, Shazelle Terry. Corinna Harris joined virtually at 1:03 PM. Blake Tullis joined in person at 1:03 PM. Justin Maughan joined in person at 1:08 PM.
3. Approval of Meeting Minutes
A.February 29, 2024
●Jeff Coombs moved to approve the February 29, 2024, Drinking Water Board meetingminutes. Shazelle Terry seconded. The motion was carried unanimously by the Board.
4.Disclosure for Conflict of Interest
None.
5.Directors Report – Nathan Lunstad
A. New Employees; Dixon Ekins, Keri Moya, Curtis Page
Dixon Ekins is the new Public Water System Planner for the Infrastructure Funding Section.
Keri Moya is the new Coordinator for the Field Services section.
Page 2
Curtis Page is the new Department of Environmental Quality District Engineer for Southeast Utah and San Juan County.

B. Enforcement Report (Board Packet Item Only) The Enforcement Report can be found in the Drinking Water Board Packet.
C. Other
Nathan briefed the Board on several Division updates. EPA PFAS Rule

The recent EPA PFAS rule established Maximum Contaminant Limits (MCL) at 4 parts per trillion, with some set at 10, and a hazard index for others. Water systems must be sampled by 2027 and implement treatment if detections occur. More information is available on the Division of Drinking Water website.

Cybersecurity Summit DDW held a Cybersecurity Summit with CISA and the FBI due to concerns about water systems being critical infrastructure targets. A letter from the White House and EPA, dated March 28,
mandates states to have a cybersecurity plan in place within 90 days. DDW's draft plan is under
review with feedback from the Governor’s office, with finalization expected within the next month. Lead Service Line Inventories

Lead Service Line Inventories are at the 6-month mark, with submissions due by the end of October 2024. Water systems are encouraged to start now, and funding is available to assist. Sanitary Survey

Sanitary Survey season is starting up, with training sessions for LHD and staff underway. Rulemaking
Nathan provided an update on the current revised rules. Today marks the last day for the public
comment period on the rule that was approved at the February 29, 2024, Board meeting. DDW plans to move forward and will likely present the rule for adoption at the June 25 Board meeting. Other

Waterlink, our online database, is undergoing upgrades and enhancements. Additionally, we are relaunching our Operator Certification training program, overseen by Helen Lau, Compliance Section manager. She is currently seeking recommendations for commission members for the certification commission. Further details will be provided soon.
Page 3
6. Rural Water Association Report – Curt Ludvigson

Curt Ludvigson represented RWAU and shared appreciation for the support of the Board and DW staff. Curt noted that the contracted RWAU staff reports are available in the packet. 7. Financial Assistance Committee Report
A. Status Report – Wayne Boyce
Wayne Boyce, DDW Financial Manager, provided an overview of the Status Report included in the packet. This report covers various financial aspects such as Federal SRF, ARPA, Authorized Projects, Lead Service Line, Emerging Contaminants, and State SRF.

He highlighted the increase in the 2024 Federal SRF Base and Supplemental Grants, which have risen to $25 million, exceeding the initial estimate of $19 million. Despite not anticipating any Base Grants due to earmarks, the Division is receiving approximately $5 million, leading to an improved financial projection.

B. Cashflow – Wayne Boyce Wayne Boyce updated the Board on the improved Cashflow projection, revealing a balance of $48 million in 2025 instead of running out of funds as previously projected. This improvement is
attributed to the postponement of projects to later years, with funding anticipated in 2025 or 2026.
The state forecast remains unchanged. C. Project Priority List – Michael Grange
Michael Grange reported there are two (2) new projects being added to the Project Priority list:
1. Wellsville City scored 21.7 priority rating points. Their project will be to drill a new well, construct a new well house, construct a pump line to an existing reservoir, and construct a flushing/drain line for the well.
2. Orderville Town Water System scored 13.8 priority rating points. Their project will
replace aging pipeline as well as install new pipeline to create an extension and connect a loop to the main water line. Orderville Town is currently in the process of repairing the well, pump, and column piping.
● Justin Maughan moved that the Drinking Water Board approve the updated project priority
list. Dawn Ramsey seconded. The motion was carried unanimously by the Board. D. SRF Applications i. Federal
a. Orderville Town Water System - Cadence Hernandez
Cadence presented the Orderville Town Water System financial assistance request. Project details can be found in the Drinking Water Board packet.
Page 4
The Financial Assistance Committee recommended that the Drinking Water Board authorize a $479,384 grant in ARPA funds to Orderville Town.

There was no discussion by the Board. ● Corinna Harris moved that the Drinking Water Board authorize a $479,384 grant in ARPA funds to Orderville Town. Jeff Coombs seconded. The motion was carried unanimously by the
Board.
b. Myton City - Kjori Shelley
Representing Myton City was Alan Allred, Water Master.
Kjori presented the Myton City financial assistance request. Project details can be found in the Drinking Water Board Packet.
The Financial Assistance Committee recommended that the Drinking Water Board authorize a
construction grant of $162,000 to Myton City. Blake Tullis inquired about the loan type and the city's role in installing meters. Alan clarified the funding is for meter purchase, with the city handling installation. Additionally, Blake inquired
about AMI meters, to which Alan explained they provide continuous updates and better
accountability. Corinna Harris asked about the meter's life expectancy, with Alan mentioning it's 20 years and Nathan adding that the battery affects its lifespan. Justin inquired if this request was for the
replacement of the entire system, to which Alan confirmed it was to replace all 364 meters.
Regarding existing meters, Nathan asked if they had one in place, Alan confirmed, but noted that due to aging technology, water was moving faster through them than they recorded. Corinna sought clarification on the unrecorded water amount, to which Alan mentioned a 25% water loss.
● Blake Tullis moved that the Drinking Water Board authorize a construction grant of $162,000
to Myton City. Corinna Harris seconded. The motion was carried unanimously by the Board. c. Desert Sage - Additional Funding - Michael Grange
Representing Desert Sage was Ryan Goodrich with Ashley Valley Water and Sewer Improvement
District (AVWSID), and Bart Jensen with Jones & DeMille Engineering. Michael presented the additional construction financial assistance request for Desert Sage HOA. Project details can be found in the Drinking Water Board packet.

This application was not presented to the Financial Assistance Committee and a specific funding recommendation is deferred to the Drinking Water Board.
Page 5
Representatives of the project, including Ryan Goodrich from AVWSID, addressed the Board, highlighting that the project aims to consolidate systems to resolve existing issues. However, bids
returned significantly higher than expected. Bart Jensen, the lead engineer, explained that the
increased cost was due to the inclusion of a loop connection under the state highway, as requested by DDW staff post-design. Unforeseen easement issues also contributed to the higher costs. Jeff Coombs inquired about the terms of the original project. Michael Grange explained that it was
funded by the ARPA grant of $570,460, but now looking at an increase of $596,307 is needed.
Michael laid out options that have been discussed with AVWSID. The Board could authorize that from the Federal Program, or hardship grant fund as a grant, or hardship grant fund as a loan, or grant mix, that is up to the Board to decide. AVWSID could establish a separate water rate for the area to pay off any loan, considering it's a low-income community. Any authorized loan would be
hardship related.
Jeff Coombs inquired if there was a recommendation from the staff and if they could offer one. Michael Grange clarified that no recommendation has been made by staff. Jeff expressed concern about a large grant amount for a few connections, equating to about $60,000 per connection,
which he found to be a substantial taxpayer subsidy. He emphasized the importance of having
some financial contribution from the recipient. Of the options presented, he favored option 2 in the packet, which had a slightly higher affordability factor but seemed reasonable. Blake Tullis suggested that the 9% affordability factor seemed arbitrary, proposing the possibility
of a lower percentage, such as 5%, to align with the 1.75% target. Michael clarified that the 9%
option wasn't arbitrary but was set as the limit for a manageable grant on the staff's side. He explained that anything below $100,000 is more costly to manage for staff, and the 9% factor allowed for a manageable loan without being excessive.
Kristi Bell inquired about the loan recipient, confirming if it would go to Desert Sage rather than
Ashley Valley. She questioned whether Ashley Valley was guaranteed to absorb Desert Sage once the IPS points were resolved. Michael clarified that Desert Sage was indeed the recipient of the loan, and Ashley Valley would absorb them eventually.
Corinna Harris questioned the substantial cost increase between the construction bid and the
engineering estimate. Burt explained that the original cost estimate was from 2022, and they utilized data from 2020-2021. Due to inflation and additions to the project, contributed to the cost increase.
Eric Franson shared his support with Jeff’s assessment, that this should be a loan combination and
suggests that they could authorize a higher loan threshold. Dawn questioned the amount of time it had taken to begin work on this project. Bart explained that obtaining grant easements took longer than anticipated due to circumstances surrounding the
Desert Sage HOA Board dissolution. They had to individually approach each property owner to
secure the necessary easements, causing the delay in construction commencement. Justin inquired about the number of IPS points the project would address. Ryan explained that their Board had passed motions to consolidate the system once certain standards were met,
Page 6
including relocating lines to the road, which would resolve all IPS points and integrate Desert Sage into the Ashley Valley system.

Ryan then raised a question about Desert Sage's $20,000 commitment and its implications for the potential $100,000 loan. Michael clarified that upfront payments from the water system are typically separate from the Financial Assistance package authorized by the Board. However, the initial $20,000 contribution was required under the ARPA grant policy set by the Board at the
time. Considering the need for additional funding, the Board may reconsider the relevance of this
contribution to the new funding authorization. ● Jeff Coombs moved that the Drinking Water Board deauthorize the $578,460 ARPA Grant and authorize a subsidy of $1,075,287 and a loan of $100,000 on a 30-year term at 0% interest
to Desert Sage HOA for their drinking water project. Justin seconded. The motion was carried
unanimously by the Board. d. Holiday Hills Association - Addition Funding - Kjori Shelley

Representing Holiday Hills Association was Krista Hiatt, Treasurer. Kjori presented the additional funding request for Holiday Hills Association. Project details can be found in the Drinking Water Board Packet. Kjori noted that she spoke with the Holiday Hills
representative, and they would be able to handle the highlighted loan/grant option in the table
available in the Holiday Hills Association packet item. Staff recommended that the Drinking Water Board authorize an additional $605,830 to the previously authorized $250,000 for a construction loan of $599,000 with 0% percent interest for
40 years with $256,830 in Principal Forgiveness to the Holiday Hills Association.
Jeff Coombs inquired about what types of homes are part of the Holiday Hills Association. Krista Hiatt noted they are primary homes.
Eric Franson asked for clarification on what changed besides the pricing. Kjori clarified that
originally when they applied they received the estimate from someone who lived in the neighborhood, but when they hired an engineer they realized it would cost more than $250,000. Blake clarified that the only scope change is the 4 hydrants. Kjori noted that in the beginning they
were done as an emergency, the application was left off originally. There was no scope change.
● Blake Tullis moved that the Drinking Water Board authorize an additional $605,830 to the previously authorized $250,000 for a construction loan of $599,000 with 0% percent interest for 40 years with $256,830 in Principal Forgiveness to the Holiday Hills Association. Shazelle
Terry seconded. The motion was carried unanimously by the Board.
ii. State a. Wellsville City - Allyson Spevak
Page 7
Representing Wellsville City were Scott Wells, City Manager, Chris Breinholt, City Engineers, and Alex Buxton with Zions Bank public finance.

Allyson presented the request for construction financial assistance for Wellsville City. Project details can be found in the Drinking Water Board Packet. The Financial Assistance Committee recommended that the Drinking Water Board authorize a
construction loan of $3,200,000 at 2.4% for 20 years to Wellsville City.
Scott Wells provided background information on the system. He noted that Latham Springs has been the main source of water for the city for many years. The springs are capable of providing water to the entire system. Another main source of water are the wells, which cannot supply the
whole system. Three years ago, the spring water flow dropped due to drought conditions.
Kristi asked if the IPS points were being resolved. Scott acknowledged those would be done. Kristi said to add a condition to the motion.
● Justin Maughan moved that the Drinking Water Board authorize a construction loan of
$3,200,000 at 2.4% for 20 years to Wellsville City under the condition that they resolve all IPS points. Corinna Harris seconded. The motion was carried unanimously by the Board. iii. Project Funds Reallocation
a. KCWCD Clark Bench & New Paria - Allyson Spevak
Representing KCWCD Clark Bench and New Paria were Mike Noel, KCWCD General Manager, and Dustyn Shaffer, Consulting Engineer with Sunrise Engineering.
Allyson presented the reallocation of project funds project for Kane County Water Conservancy
District and New Paria. Project details can be found in the Drinking Water Board Packet. Staff recommended that the Drinking Water Board authorize the reallocation of $527,141 from the Clark Bench Water Company ARPA project to the New Paria Water Company’s ARPA project.

Dustyn commented that the project was originally authorized for two systems, since then, KCWCD has taken over the operations of the systems. ● Corinna Harris moved that the Drinking Water Board authorize the reallocation of $527,141
from the Clark Bench Water Company ARPA project to the New Paria Water Company’s
ARPA project. Jeff Coombs seconded. The motion was carried unanimously by the Board. 8. Public Comment Period

None. 9. Open Board Discussion
Page 8
Rural Utah Board Meeting & Tour
The Board explored hosting a meeting close to a water system funded by them. They decided to
tour the East Carbon treatment plant and hold a meeting in Price for the November 12, 2024, Board meeting. Status Reports, Financial Reports Etc.

Kristi inquired about the Board's perspective on the presented items and if there were any preferences for more or less information. Blake proposed placing the IPS points at the top of the page for clarity.
10. Other
None. 11. Next Board Meeting

Date: June 25, 2024 Time: 1:00 PM Place: Multi-Agency State Office Building 195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
12. Adjourn ● Jeff Coombs moved to adjourn the meeting. Blake Tullis seconded. The motion was
carried unanimously by the Board.

Agenda Item
3(B)
195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144830 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4830 Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone] www.deq.utah.gov Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

Drinking Water Board Kristi Bell, ChairEric Franson, P.E., Vice-ChairDawn RamseyJustin MaughanCorinna HarrisJeff CoombsBlake Tullis, Ph.D.Shazelle TerryKimberly D. ShelleyNathan Lunstad Executive Secretary
SPENCER J. COX Governor
DEIDRE HENDERSONLieutenant Governor
Department of
Environmental Quality
Kimberly D. ShelleyExecutive Director
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATERNathan Lunstad, P.E.Director
DRINKING WATER BOARD MEETING
May 24, 2024, 10:00 AM
Via Zoom Webinar
DRAFT MINUTES
1.Call to Order
Kristi Bell, Chair, called the Drinking Water Board (Board, DWB) meeting to order at 10:00 AM.
2.Roll Call – Michael Grange
Board Members Present at Roll Call: Kristi Bell, Eric Franson, Corinna Harris, Blake Tullis, and Shazelle Terry. Jeff Coombs joined virtually at 10:05 AM.
3.Disclosure for Conflict of Interest
None.
4.Financial Assistance Committee ReportA.SRF Applications
i.Federal
a.Summit County Service Area #3 (Allyson Spevak)
Representing Summit County Service Area #3 were Vince Pao-Borjigin, Joan O’Brien, Chris Bullock, and Joe Santos.
Allyson Spevak presented the Summit County Service Area #3 financial assistance request. Project details can be found in the Drinking Water Board Packet.
Staff recommends the Drinking Water Board authorize a construction loan of $3,302,414 with
$660,414 in principal forgiveness to Summit County Service Area #3 Municipality/Water System,
for a repayable loan amount of $2,642,000 at 0.50% for 40 years.
Vince Pao-Borjigin sought clarification on the average water bill, noting it should be around $109, not the $203 recorded in the packet. Michael Grange explained that the $203 figure comes from
the application Summit County Service Area #3 provided. He suggested that the system and SRF
team review the numbers provided after the meeting. Michael clarified that the $203 is based on
Page 2
the revenue numbers and the number of connections, as calculated. Vince questioned if it was not reflected in the application that half of the residents are not on the water system but still contribute
revenue. Michael confirmed that a standby fee and other line items on the application were
considered. He emphasized that the number used in calculating whether the system qualifies for a subsidy, which is crucial for the presentation to the board, is the After-Project water bill. This estimate is based on the after-project water bill, and the current payment plays only a minor role in the project proposal.

Eric Franson asked if the after-project water bill estimation of $231 per month would be affected if the starting number is closer to $109. Michael Grange clarified that it wouldn't necessarily change since the connection numbers in the database align with spreading out the $2.6 million loan over 40 years, resulting in the $231 monthly bill. Summit County Service Area #3 determines
how to spread this cost among residents, a common situation in rural areas with standby lots. The
repayment schedule is based on a 40-year term with 0.5% interest. Blake Tullis noted the packet indicates a $30 increase per connection to repay the loan, suggesting the bill would rise from $109 to $139, much lower than $231. Michael confirmed that the actual
repayment requires $231.04 and suggested reviewing the numbers with Vince and Allyson.
Allyson stated the annual repayment is about $84,000, and Grange clarified the monthly bill would be roughly $140 per connection, not $231. Eric noted this might make Summit County Service Area ineligible for principal forgiveness, which Michael confirmed as possible, mentioning their application for additional projects to be reviewed at the June meeting.

Vince Pao-Borjigin clarified that the standby fees come from around 200 residences with private wells using the service area's water rights. These residences cannot connect to the system, and their fees don't reflect service area expenses. Currently, there are about 209 connections, with few vacant properties. Vince emphasized that although there are 500 residences, less than half are on
the actual water system and don't contribute to its expenses or revenues.
Eric Franson asked if replacing the tank with a 750,000-gallon tank is sufficient for the long-term master plan or if there's an opportunity to upsize it. Joe Santos confirmed that the forecast aligns with their needs.

Eric also commented on the cost estimate, noting that the contingency numbers seem larger than 10%. The representatives clarified that those were their estimates. Corinna Harris asked about the contingency plan if the tank fails before construction is completed.
Vince clarified that the system can isolate the tank and use a backup storage tank. They could also
run both wells, though one has high arsenic levels and is only authorized for about three months per year. Joe Santos added that the tank serves a higher zone and would need to be run through the PRB station.
● Eric Franson moved that the Drinking Water Board authorize a construction loan of
$3,302,414 to Summit County Service Area #3 Municipality/Water System, for a repayable loan amount of $3,302,414 at 0.50% for 40 years. Corinna Harris seconded. The motion was carried unanimously.
Page 3
Eric explained that given the uncertainties regarding the actual costs, the motion allows for a conservative approach with the flexibility to adjust at the next board meeting. If the water bill
turns out to be $240, more principal forgiveness can be provided in the upcoming application.
Conversely, if it is $140, the proposed loan package would be appropriate. This approach enables immediate action in an emergency situation while providing an opportunity to reassess the figures. 5. Public Comment Period

None. 6. Open Board Discussion
None.
7. Next Board Meeting Date: June 25, 2024
Time: 1:00 PM
Place: Multi-Agency State Office Building 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, UT 84116
8. Adjourn

● Jeff Coombs moved to adjourn the meeting. Blake Tullis seconded. The motion was carried unanimously by the Board.

Agenda Item
5(A)
Board Report As of June 11, 2024
PWS ID PWS Name PWS Type Pop Served IPS Pts Rating Rating Date
Corrective Action Systems
Not Approved Systems
UTAH13001 ALTON TOWN WATER SYSTEM Community 136 180 Corrective Action 6/24/2021
UTAH22114 BULL MOOSE WATERWORKS Transient Non-Community 136 330 Corrective Action 1/2/2024
UTAH29092 COLE CANYON WATER COMPANY Community 39 45 Corrective Action 10/17/2023
UTAH26033 DEER CREEK PARK Transient Non-Community 150 40 Corrective Action 7/8/2020
UTAH14051 DESERET - OASIS SSD Community 490 270 Corrective Action 1/3/2024
UTAH02010 EAST GROUSE CREEK PIPELINE CO Community 70 135 Corrective Action 9/9/2020
UTAH20056 ESCAPE RV RESORTS - MT PLEASANT Transient Non-Community 144 75 Corrective Action 9/29/2023
UTAH29053 GREEN HILLS COUNTRY ESTATES Community 237 565 Corrective Action 1/2/2024
UTAH18147 HI-COUNTRY ESTATES #1 Community 300 50 Corrective Action 3/19/2024
UTAH14004 HINCKLEY TOWN WATER SYSTEM Community 675 290 Corrective Action 1/10/2024
UTAH14013 HOLDEN TOWN WATER SYSTEM Community 475 45 Corrective Action 2/1/2024
UTAH18055 MT HAVEN OWNERS ASSOCIATION Transient Non-Community 85 15 Corrective Action 4/12/2023
UTAH08034 PACIFICORP HUNTINGTON PLANT Non-Transient 175 30 Corrective Action 4/24/2023
UTAH23075 PENNEYS GRILL LLC Transient Non-Community 27 285 Corrective Action 3/10/2023
UTAH22080 PINES RANCH Transient Non-Community 100 75 Corrective Action 4/11/2024
UTAH27089 BIG PLAINS WATER SSD - CEDAR POINT Community 232 305 Corrective Action 10/17/2023
UTAH07067 SOUTH DUCHESNE CULINARY WATER Community 286 220 Corrective Action 5/25/2022
UTAH29046 VALLEY VIEW STAKE CAMP Transient Non-Community 300 45 Corrective Action 7/20/2022
UTAH17001 BRIDGERLAND WATER CO Community 240 0 Corrective Action 2/22/2023
UTAH09098 YONDER ESCALANTE LLC Transient Non-Community 107 75 Not Approved 5/6/2024
UTAH03002 AMALGA TOWN WATER SYSTEM Community 495 100 Not Approved 1/19/2024
UTAH07032 CAMP TIMBER LANE Transient Non-Community 942 0 Not Approved 5/22/2024
UTAH24051 DESERT SAGE HOA Community 55 1175 Not Approved 1/12/2022
UTAH11099 FOOTHILL WATER USERS ASSOCIATION Community 28 445 Not Approved 3/27/2023
UTAH25184 BATEMANS MOSIDA FARMS Community 90 1125 Not Approved 10/30/2023
UTAH28005 LYMAN WATER SYSTEM Community 225 130 Not Approved 4/9/2024
UTAH02078 M & J TRAILER HOME COMMUNITY Community 27 670 Not Approved 8/20/2018
UTAH15015 MOUNTAIN GREEN WATER ASSOCIATION Community 47 145 Not Approved 10/23/2023
UTAH29107 POLE PATCH WATER SYSTEM Community 68 0 Not Approved 10/23/2023
UTAH25077 RIVERBEND GROVE INC Transient Non-Community 25 240 Not Approved 2/10/2021
UTAH22050 SHADY DELL-SOAPSTONE CAMPGROUNDS Transient Non-Community 109 90 Not Approved 4/9/2024
Agenda Item
6
Rural Water Association Report
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
June 25, 2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD PACKET
Rural Water Association Report
Table of Contents
Terry Smith - Compliance Specialist – ............................................................................................... 2
Janell Braithwaite –Management Technician .................................................................................... 8
Curt Ludvigson – Management Technician .................................................................................... 15
Water is Life
Rural Water Association - DWB Report
Report Period: April, 2024
Terry Smith - Compliance Circuit Rider
Contract Goal Titles
Hours,
Current
Month
Contract
YTD Hours
Achieved
Contract YTD
Goal Hours
Annual
Contract
Goals
Asset Management/Evaluation 0 4 27 80
Board/Council Training 0 0 9 26
Budget Planning/Evaluation 0 0 9 26
Capacity Development/Master Planning 0 0 21 64
Classroom Instruction/Training 40 109 16 48
Compliance/Rules Assistance 36 100 91 272
DDW Interaction/Meetings/Reports 9 42 16 48
Emergency Response 1 1 6 18
Energy Efficiency Study 0 0 4 12
Funding Procurement 1 1 8 24
O&M Training & Assistance 2 23 5 14
Off-Site Assistance 0 4 32 96
Ordinance, Resolutions, By-Laws 0 0 1 4
RWAU Conference 7 49 21 64
Training Received 0 0 12 36
Water Loss/Auditing 0 0 24 72
Water Rate Development/Analysis 0 12 11 32
Training Development 0 9 32 96
Totals:96 344 312 936
Water is Life
Report Period: April, 2024
Notable Assistance & Work Performed
System Description:
KANAB CITY Proctored 4 exams
VARIOUS WATER SYSTEMS Teaching presentation, Extreme Events Emergency Response
VARIOUS WATER SYSTEMS Teaching presentation - Water Math & Spreadsheet Basics
WASHINGTON CO WCD Proctoring exams (2)
MINERSVILLE TOWN WATER Proctor exam - Tevan Erikson
RED WASH (24020)Online meeting with S. Atwood- WTTC Orders - provide direction
MARYSVALE TOWN Directed Nathan on how to troubleshoot/fix chlorinator
VIRGIN TOWN New operator training - Kaige Steglich
ST GEORGE CITY Proctor exam - V. Soto
STANDING BEAR RV PARK (20072)Helping Jennifer with rule pertaining to seasonal opening
BOULDER MOUNTAIN LODGE Helping Ron with Level 1 assessment, Seasonal Opening, sampling
THATCHER PENROSE SD Randy called - helping with peak day demand calc/reporting
OGDEN CITY WTR T4 exam review with Lee Wahlstrom
ESCALANTE VLY HOUSING Helping Rock with LSL inventory rule and PFAS sampling planning
ESCALANTE TOWN (09004)Discussed Cross Connection rule and advised on program - Blaine
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Water is Life
Rural Water Association of Utah
Water System Direct Assistance Report
Report Month:April Total Hours Worked:159.00
Contract
Terry Smith
Hours Spent Assisting Specific Systems:38.75
Employee:Direct System Assistance Percentage:24%
4/1/2024 Exam proctoring scheduling - Tevan Off Site MINERSVILLE TOWN WATER 0.50
4/2/2024 Proctored 4 exams On Site KANAB CITY 3.75
4/2/2024 Reached out to Red Wash to offer WTTC system assistance Off Site RED WASH (24020)0.50
4/2/2024 Reached out to Wellington RV Park to offer WTTC assistance Off Site WELLINGTON RV PARK (04061)0.25
4/4/2024 Teaching presentation, Extreme Events Emergency Response Off Site VARIOUS WATER SYSTEMS 1.50
4/4/2024 Teaching presentation - Water Math & Spreadsheet Basics Off Site VARIOUS WATER SYSTEMS 1.50
4/5/2024 Working on exam review - Lee Wahlstrom Off Site OGDEN CITY WTR 2.50
4/9/2024 Proctoring exams (2)On Site WASHINGTON CO WCD 3.50
4/9/2024 Creating document explaining Orders. Sent to McKay for meeting.Off Site WELLINGTON RV PARK (04061)2.00
4/10/2024 Proctor exam - Tevan Erikson On Site MINERSVILLE TOWN WATER 2.50
4/10/2024 Working on rules explanation document for WTTC Orders Off Site RED WASH (24020)1.00
4/10/2024 Online meeting with S. Atwood- WTTC Orders - provide direction Off Site RED WASH (24020)1.00
4/11/2024 Directed Nathan on how to troubleshoot/fix chlorinator Off Site MARYSVALE TOWN 0.50
4/11/2024 Preparing documents for new operator training today Off Site VIRGIN TOWN 1.00
4/11/2024 New operator training - Kaige Steglich On Site VIRGIN TOWN 1.50
4/12/2024 Proctor exam - V. Soto On Site ST GEORGE CITY 2.00
4/15/2024 Helping Cory with changes to Lead/Copper sampling Off Site HURRICANE CITY 1.00
4/15/2024 Working on FTF list - contacting systems to offer assistance Off Site VARIOUS WATER SYSTEMS 2.00
4/15/2024
Review new system order and send assistance offer email to
administrator Off Site ZION RED ROCK RETREAT (27115)1.00
4/22/2024 Helping Ron with Level 1 assessment, Seasonal Opening, sampling Off Site BOULDER MOUNTAIN LODGE 1.50
4/22/2024 Training on new pressure control valve - troubleshooting Off Site PANGUITCH CITY 0.50
4/23/2024 Prep for exam review this morning - L. Wahlstrom Off Site OGDEN CITY WTR 1.50
4/23/2024 T4 exam review with Lee Wahlstrom Off Site OGDEN CITY WTR 2.00
4/25/2024 Helping Nathan with Source Protection updates Off Site MARYSVALE TOWN 1.00
4/25/2024 Helping Rock with LSL inventory rule and PFAS sampling planning Off Site ESCALANTE VLY HOUSING 1.00
4/30/2024 Reaching out to Jodi regarding ERT from the DDW Off Site LIBERTY PIPELINE 1.00
4/30/2024 Discussed Cross Connection rule and advised on program - Blaine Off Site ESCALANTE TOWN (09004)0.75
Water is Life
Rural Water Association - DWB Report
Report Period: May, 2024
Terry Smith - Compliance Circuit Rider
Contract Goal Titles
Hours,
Current
Month
Contract
YTD Hours
Achieved
Contract YTD
Goal Hours
Annual
Contract
Goals
Asset Management/Evaluation 0 4 33 80
Board/Council Training 0 0 11 26
Budget Planning/Evaluation 0 0 11 26
Capacity Development/Master Planning 0 0 27 64
Classroom Instruction/Training 7 116 20 48
Compliance/Rules Assistance 32 132 113 272
DDW Interaction/Meetings/Reports 8 50 20 48
Emergency Response 5 6 8 18
Energy Efficiency Study 0 0 5 12
Funding Procurement 2 3 10 24
O&M Training & Assistance 11 35 6 14
Off-Site Assistance 2 6 40 96
Ordinance, Resolutions, By-Laws 0 0 2 4
RWAU Conference 0 49 27 64
Training Received 0 0 15 36
Water Loss/Auditing 2 2 30 72
Water Rate Development/Analysis 4 16 13 32
Training Development 0 9 40 96
Totals:72 417 390 936
Water is Life
Report Period: May, 2024
Notable Assistance & Work Performed
System Description:
MARYSVALE TOWN Working on SP update instructional template for Marysvale, others
LIBERTY PIPELINE Report from Jake - assisting Thom with sampling plan
MARYSVALE TOWN Working on plan SP plan review and guidance document for update
LYMAN WATER SYSTEM Exam review and proctoring for Bruce (passed)
ENTERPRISE CITY Online meeting - training on how to create a CCR
HOLIDAY HILLS ASSN (25038)Online meeting with Christine - advise on new Public sys rules
LAST CHANCE SKI RANCH (23088)Responsed back to Rick with list of deficiences and offer of assist
OLD MEADOW WATER CO Met with David to go over O&M reccomendations for new equip
WASHINGTON CO WCD Exam review and proctoring - A. Madsen
YONDER ESCALANTE (09098)Email to Tanner - op cert process, CC compliance, SP, exemption
JOHNSON WATER DIST Online meeting with Wes to discuss rate structure changes
CAMP WAPITI (23035)Meeting with Jim to train on chlorination O&M and rules
GENOLA TOWN Training on hooking up chlorine dose pump to well - Iron Bact.
UKON WATER CO Scheduling staff for onsite assistance
JOHNSON WATER DIST Online meeting to go over rate structures using spreadsheet
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Water is Life
Rural Water Association of Utah
Water System Direct Assistance Report
Report Month:May Total Hours Worked:135.00
Contract
Terry Smith
Hours Spent Assisting Specific Systems:36.75
Employee:Direct System Assistance Percentage:27%
5/8/2024 Preparing for online training with Clint at 9:00 Off Site ENTERPRISE CITY 1.00
5/8/2024 Online meeting - training on how to create a CCR Off Site ENTERPRISE CITY 1.00
5/8/2024 Discussion with Robbie pertaining to chlorinator installations Off Site CEDAR CITY 0.50
5/8/2024 Chris called asking about well treatment for iron bacteria Off Site GENOLA TOWN 0.50
5/9/2024 Email to Ron explaining notice of deficiency and response Off Site BOULDER MTN GUEST RANCH 0.50
5/9/2024 Reached out to Jim to set up an onsite appointment visit.Off Site CAMP WAPITI (23035)0.50
5/9/2024 Online meeting with Christine - advise on new Public sys rules Off Site HOLIDAY HILLS ASSN (25038)1.50
5/9/2024 Teaching Op-Cert math refresher Off Site VARIOUS WATER SYSTEMS 1.50
5/10/2024 Created indepth guidance addressing each requirement - WTTC Off Site HOLIDAY HILLS ASSN (25038)2.00
5/14/2024 Responsed back to Rick with list of deficiences and offer of assist Off Site LAST CHANCE SKI RANCH (23088)0.50
5/14/2024 Met with David to go over O&M reccomendations for new equip On Site OLD MEADOW WATER CO 1.25
5/15/2024 Exam review and proctoring - A. Madsen On Site WASHINGTON CO WCD 2.50
5/15/2024 Working with Jake on ERT request Off Site SUMMIT CO SERV AREA #3 0.50
5/15/2024 Emails pertaining to chlorination and sampling for Op-Permit Off Site CAMP WAPITI (23035)0.50
5/16/2024 Helping Krista, providing direction regarding chlorine monitoring, etc.Off Site HOLIDAY HILLS ASSN (25038)0.50
5/16/2024 Email to Tanner - op cert process, CC compliance, SP, exemption Off Site YONDER ESCALANTE (09098)1.50
5/16/2024 Planning proctoring session with Marie Off Site ST GEORGE CITY 0.50
5/16/2024 Working on Johnson Water rate evaluation Off Site JOHNSON WATER DIST 1.00
5/17/2024 Working on rate spreadsheet in preparation for meeting today Off Site JOHNSON WATER DIST 1.50
5/17/2024 Online meeting with Wes to discuss rate structure changes Off Site JOHNSON WATER DIST 1.00
5/17/2024 Call from Mike regarding sampling rules Off Site PARAGONAH TOWN 0.50
5/20/2024 Meeting with Jim to train on chlorination O&M and rules On Site CAMP WAPITI (23035)2.50
5/21/2024 Training on hooking up chlorine dose pump to well - Iron Bact.On Site GENOLA TOWN 2.50
5/28/2024 Via phone, helping Jim with dosing and operation - chlorine treatment Off Site CAMP WAPITI (23035)1.00
5/28/2024 Via phone, advised Ron on chlorination +TC and residual test kit Off Site BOULDER MTN GUEST RANCH 1.00
5/28/2024 Working with staff and system - emergency response Off Site UKON WATER CO 3.00
5/28/2024 Advised Lloyd about order to take TC source samples Off Site PEOA PIPELINE CO 0.50
5/29/2024 Davfd called - question on chlorine approval. Researched/advised.Off Site FOOTHILL WATER USERS (11099)1.00
5/29/2024 Called/left message. Sent asset management docs to Scott Off Site WELLSVILLE CITY 1.00
5/30/2024 Proctoring exams (4)On Site ST GEORGE CITY 2.50
5/30/2024 Online meeting to go over rate structures using spreadsheet Off Site JOHNSON WATER DIST 1.00
Water is Life
Rural Water Association - DWB Report
Report Period: April, 2024
Janell Braithwaite - Management Technician
Contract Goal Titles
Hours,
Current
Month
Contract
YTD Hours
Achieved
Contract YTD
Goal Hours
Annual
Contract
Goals
Capacity Development/Master Planning 3 17 21 64
Water Rate Development & Fee Analysis 10 87 29 87
Asset Management/Evaluation 11 13 27 80
Budget Planning/Evaluation 6 41 16 48
RWAU Conference 2 97 21 64
Training Received 28 46 19 56
Classroom Instruction/Training 6 10 12 36
DDW Interaction/Meetings/Reports 5 14 16 48
Funding Procurement 4 22 8 24
Water Loss/Auditing 3 24 24 72
Locating and Securing Engineering 0 5 3 10
Ordinance, Resolution, By-Law Development 0 6 1 4
Energy Efficiency Study 0 0 4 12
Board/Council Training 4 11 9 26
Emergency Response 0 0 4 12
Onsite O&M Training 4 20 7 20
Compliance/Rules Assistance, CCC, Water Monitor 15 48 62 185
Training Development 26 34 8 24
Totals:125 497 291 872
Water is Life
Report Period: April, 2024
Notable Assistance & Work Performed
System Description:
SAN JUAN CO SA #1- BLUFF Meet w/Bluff Town Council re: funding, projects, compliance, rates
MEXICAN HAT SSD Meet w/Joy to discuss compliance, funding, projects, manganese
BLANDING CITY Meet w/Trent and James to discuss new rates,budget, depreciation
MEXICAN HAT SSD Meet w/Sylvia Stubb, Co Commiss. re: projects needed, funding
MONTICELLO CITY Meet w/Mayor Hedglin & City Manager Kulow re: rates, budget
Meet online w/M. Grange, Curt and Terry
GREEN RIVER CITY Meet w/Tyler, City Mgr to review updates to rates, budget, asset mgm
MOUNTAIN REGNL WTR SSD Discuss funding and project w/Lisa
UINTAH CITY Call from Kristi Bell re: development and ordinances
SUMMIT CO SERV AREA #3 Online mtg. w/Vincent re: funding app, answer questions
Teach CCC Local Authority presentation in Mayfield
WALES TOWN Attend council meeting, discuss compliance, depreciation and rates
GENOLA TOWN Attend Genola council work session to review rates and budget
PINION FORREST (07073)Meet w/Clyde, water op, to develop asset management plan
HELPER CITY Meet w/Brittany to review rate study before council review-low usage
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Water is Life
Rural Water Association of Utah
Water System Assistance Report
Report Month:April Total Work Hours:192.0
Contract
Janell Braithwaite
Hours Spent Assisting Specific Systems:53.25
Employee:Direct System Assistance Percentage:28%
4/2/2024 Research and prepare for mtg. w/Bluff today Off Site SAN JUAN CO SA #1- BLUFF 1.50
4/2/2024 Meet w/Bluff Town Council re: funding, projects, compliance, rates On Site SAN JUAN CO SA #1- BLUFF 1.25
4/2/2024 Meet w/Joy to discuss compliance, funding, projects, manganese On Site MEXICAN HAT SSD 1.50
4/3/2024 Work on information for mtg. w/Karen Off Site HURRICANE CITY 0.50
4/3/2024 Call Karen and discuss compliance and system improvements Off Site HURRICANE CITY 1.00
4/3/2024 Call Jake, discuss projects needed at White Mesa Off Site INT'L URANIUM (WHITE MESA)0.50
4/3/2024 Work on rate study for Helper Off Site HELPER CITY 1.25
4/3/2024 Meet w/Trent and James to discuss new rates,budget, depreciation On Site BLANDING CITY 2.00
4/3/2024 Meet w/Sylvia Stubb, Co Commiss. re: projects needed, funding Off Site MEXICAN HAT SSD 0.50
4/3/2024 Meet w/Mayor Hedglin & City Manager Kulow re: rates, budget On Site MONTICELLO CITY 0.50
4/3/2024 Discuss Mexican Hat w/Ron, re: projects needed and funding Off Site MEXICAN HAT SSD 0.50
4/3/2024 Update rate study for Green River to meet tomorrow Off Site GREEN RIVER CITY 1.00
4/4/2024 Work on improvements to rate study to help Blanding Off Site BLANDING CITY 0.75
4/4/2024 Meet w/Tyler, City Mgr to review updates to rates, budget, asset mgm On Site GREEN RIVER CITY 1.25
4/4/2024 Meet w/new Finance Director, Rob, discuss rate study and budget On Site RICHFIELD CITY WATER 0.50
4/4/2024 Call from Jim re: water rights and ccc ceu trainings Off Site STERLING TOWN 0.25
4/4/2024 Call from Curt re: Mexican Hat project and funding Off Site MEXICAN HAT SSD 0.25
4/5/2024 Work on putting info together needed to get budget/rate study started and send to KaedenOff Site MONTICELLO CITY 0.50
4/5/2024 Put asset mgmt info together and send to Tyler Off Site GREEN RIVER CITY 0.50
4/5/2024 Work on rate study for Helper Off Site HELPER CITY 0.75
4/8/2024 Contact Ken Hoffman re: funding for Bluff proposed project, and to update EPA funding presentationOff Site SAN JUAN CO SA #1- BLUFF 0.50
4/8/2024 Get meeting scheduled w/Curt and review wrs info sent by Stephanie Off Site BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 0.50
4/9/2024 Discuss funding and project w/Lisa Off Site MOUNTAIN REGNL WTR SSD 0.25
4/9/2024 Call from Kristi Bell re: development and ordinances Off Site UINTAH CITY 0.50
4/10/2024 Contacted by Jerilyn for possible WRS, info sent to get started Off Site UINTAH HIGHLANDS ID 0.50
4/10/2024 Online mtg. w/Vincent re: funding app, answer questions Off Site SUMMIT CO SERV AREA #3 1.25
4/10/2024 Call from Mike D. re: budget and rate study for Manila Off Site MANILA TOWN 0.50
4/10/2024 Discuss rate study w/Miles Nielsen, info needed sent to Miles Off Site PRICE CITY 0.25
4/10/2024 Called Eric Wells re: rate study requested, discussed info needed Off Site HANKSVILLE TOWN 0.50
4/11/2024 Discuss system and compliance w/water op, Jim Egner Off Site STERLING TOWN 0.75
4/11/2024 Discuss compliance and CCC w/water op, Matt Reber Off Site REDMOND TOWN 0.25
4/11/2024 Attend council meeting, discuss projects, funding, rates, asset mgmt On Site HENRIEVILLE TOWN 2.25
4/12/2024 Work with Lucinda to set up mtg. w/council Off Site GENOLA TOWN 0.25
4/12/2024 Discuss usage reports, budget and usage w/Marie, Town Clerk On Site HENRIEVILLE TOWN 0.50
4/15/2024 Received rate study info from Price, review, start wrs Off Site PRICE CITY 1.00
4/15/2024 Work on funding info for Wales mtg. tonight Off Site WALES TOWN 1.00
4/15/2024 Work on rate study for Price Off Site PRICE CITY 2.00
4/15/2024 Attend council meeting, discuss compliance, depreciation and rates On Site WALES TOWN 2.25
4/16/2024 Work on updating rate study to review w/City Recorder Off Site GENOLA TOWN 0.50
4/16/2024 Review water rates and budget w/Lucinda to present to council tomorrowOn Site GENOLA TOWN 1.50
4/17/2024 Attend Genola council work session to review rates and budget On Site GENOLA TOWN 1.50
4/19/2024 Discuss rates and budget w/Curt to present to Elwood Off Site ELWOOD TOWN 1.00
4/23/2024 Call from Curt re: budget and rates for Hatch Off Site HATCH TOWN 0.50
4/23/2024 Work on updating rate study and budget for Elwood Off Site ELWOOD TOWN 1.00
4/24/2024 Discuss Heber City system, asset mgmt w/Chris, public works On Site HEBER CITY 0.50
4/25/2024 Meet w/Clyde, water op, to develop asset management plan On Site PINION FORREST (07073)2.00
4/25/2024 Meet w/Jenny to followup on compliance issues On Site AXIA LAKESIDE, LLC 0.50
4/25/2024 Work on asset management plan, contact engineer for project info Off Site PINION FORREST (07073)4.00
4/25/2024 Finish up Helper rate study to meet with Brittany tomorrow Off Site HELPER CITY 3.00
4/26/2024 Receive info from Jeff, work on asset management plan Off Site PINION FORREST (07073)0.50
4/26/2024 Call from Curt re: questions from Hatch re: rates, compliance Off Site HATCH TOWN 0.50
4/26/2024 Meet w/Brittany to review rate study before council review-low usage On Site HELPER CITY 2.25
4/29/2024 Proctor Chase McCain for D2 op exam On Site DELTA CITY 2.25
Water is Life
Rural Water Association - DWB Report
Report Period: May, 2024
Janell Braithwaite - Management Technician
Contract Goal Titles
Hours,
Current
Month
Contract
YTD Hours
Achieved
Contract YTD
Goal Hours
Annual
Contract
Goals
Capacity Development/Master Planning 10 27 27 64
Water Rate Development & Fee Analysis 38 126 36 87
Asset Management/Evaluation 4 17 33 80
Budget Planning/Evaluation 25 66 20 48
RWAU Conference 2 99 27 64
Training Received 4 50 23 56
Classroom Instruction/Training 0 10 15 36
DDW Interaction/Meetings/Reports 3 17 20 48
Funding Procurement 7 28 10 24
Water Loss/Auditing 3 27 30 72
Locating and Securing Engineering 0 5 4 10
Ordinance, Resolution, By-Law Development 1 7 2 4
Energy Efficiency Study 0 0 5 12
Board/Council Training 2 13 11 26
Emergency Response 1 1 5 12
Onsite O&M Training 4 24 8 20
Compliance/Rules Assistance, CCC, Water Monitor 4 52 77 185
Training Development 4 38 10 24
Totals:111 608 363 872
Water is Life
Report Period: May, 2024
Notable Assistance & Work Performed
System Description:
ELWOOD TOWN Work on updating Elwood's rate and budget review for them
PRICE CITY Work on rate study for Price
Attend online ACS meeting w/DDW
FREMONT WATER WORKS Contact Kait and Gary Rager re: Taylor's CCC Admin
ELWOOD TOWN Attend online mtg. w/Steve,Curt and Gina to review budget,rates,project
HELPER CITY Meet w/Brittney, Zach and Cole (Council and Recorder) review WRS
DRAPER CITY WATER Prepare and meet online w/Jordan Wall, funding and project questions
GREEN RIVER CITY Update rate study for Green River, Tyler, for budget and new rates
BIG WATER MUNICIPAL Meet online w/Stephanie, David and Curt to review rate study, revenues, projects
PINION FORREST (07073)Prepare for and meet online w/Melissa. re: asset management plan
SUMMIT CO SERV AREA #3 Contacted by Vince re: main tank leak, contact Jake and Terry
HATCH TOWN Attend council mtg. to discuss projects, rates, budget and depreciation
UINTAH HIGHLANDS ID Work on rate study for Uintah Highlands
MANILA TOWN Work on rate study for Manila
BIG PLAINS/APPLE VLY (27069)Call from Dan, water op, re: compliance and projects
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Water is Life
Rural Water Association of Utah
Water System Assistance Report
Report Month:May Total Work Hours:147.0
Contract
Janell Braithwaite
Hours Spent Assisting Specific Systems:98.25
Employee:Direct System Assistance Percentage:67%
5/6/2024 Prepare for meeting at Daniel Town tonight-update info, call Dennis Off Site DANIEL DOMESTIC WATER 1.00
5/6/2024 Contacted by Stewart re: CCR, contact Jenny and give Stewart update Off Site CENTERFIELD TOWN 0.50
5/6/2024 Work on updating Elwood's rate and budget review for them Off Site ELWOOD TOWN 1.00
5/6/2024 Work on rate study for Price Off Site PRICE CITY 2.00
5/8/2024 Contact Gina to review rate study and correct information Off Site ELWOOD TOWN 1.50
5/8/2024 Work with Josh at Duchesne to reschedule exam proctoring Off Site EAST DUCHESNE CUL WID 0.25
5/8/2024 Contact Krista, questions re: compliance and WTTC letter Off Site HOLIDAY HILLS, HOA 0.50
5/8/2024 Work on Elwood's rate study building new category Off Site ELWOOD TOWN 2.25
5/9/2024 Contact Kait and Gary Rager re: Taylor's CCC Admin Off Site FREMONT WATER WORKS 0.50
5/9/2024 Work on updating Elwood's rate study for 1:00 mtg.Off Site ELWOOD TOWN 1.00
5/9/2024 Attend online mtg. w/Steve,Curt and Gina to review budget,rates,project Off Site ELWOOD TOWN 1.75
5/9/2024 Work on updating rates, budget for project Off Site BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 2.50
5/10/2024 Proctor James Erkilla for CCC Admin On Site SCOFIELD TOWN 1.00
5/10/2024 Proctor Josh Byrnes for CCC Admin On Site EAST DUCHESNE CUL WID 1.00
5/10/2024 Work on rate study for Helper for 2:00 pm meeting Off Site HELPER CITY 1.00
5/10/2024 Meet w/Brittney, Zach and Cole (Council and Recorder) review WRS On Site HELPER CITY 1.50
5/13/2024 Work on Big Water rate study and call Curt to discuss for mtg.Off Site BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 2.50
5/14/2024 Prepare and meet online w/Jordan Wall, funding and project questions Off Site DRAPER CITY WATER 1.50
5/14/2024 Prepare for Big Water meeting Off Site BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 0.50
5/14/2024 Update rate study for Green River, Tyler, for budget and new rates Off Site GREEN RIVER CITY 2.00
5/14/2024 Meet online w/Stephanie, David and Curt to review rate study, revenues, projectsOff Site BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 1.25
5/15/2024 Prepare for and meet online w/Melissa. re: asset management plan Off Site PINION FORREST (07073)2.00
5/15/2024 Work on rate study for Uintah Highlands Off Site UINTAH HIGHLANDS ID 2.00
5/15/2024 Contacted by Vince re: main tank leak, contact Jake and Terry Off Site SUMMIT CO SERV AREA #3 0.50
5/15/2024 Prepare for Hatch's council mtg. tonight, review info, meter costs, rates, budgetOff Site HATCH TOWN 1.25
5/15/2024 Attend council mtg. to discuss projects, rates, budget and depreciation On Site HATCH TOWN 2.00
5/16/2024 Work on rate study for Uintah Highlands Off Site UINTAH HIGHLANDS ID 1.00
5/16/2024 Work on editing cross connection ordinance Off Site OREM CITY 1.00
5/17/2024 Work on rate study for Uintah Highlands Off Site UINTAH HIGHLANDS ID 0.25
5/17/2024 Meet online w/Terry, Wes Handberg and Karen to discuss wrs Off Site JOHNSON WATER DIST 1.00
5/17/2024 Work on rate study for Uintah Highlands Off Site UINTAH HIGHLANDS ID 1.75
5/17/2024 Work on rate study for Uintah Highlands Off Site UINTAH HIGHLANDS ID 3.75
5/20/2024 Work on rate study for Uintah Highlands Off Site UINTAH HIGHLANDS ID 3.25
5/20/2024 Work on rate study for Uintah Highlands Off Site UINTAH HIGHLANDS ID 3.00
5/21/2024 Work on budget and rate study Off Site UINTAH HIGHLANDS ID 1.75
5/21/2024 Work on budget and rate study Off Site UINTAH HIGHLANDS ID 2.00
5/21/2024 Work on rate study for Manila Off Site MANILA TOWN 2.00
5/22/2024 Work on water rate study-contact Jennifer and Mayor Kathy for info Off Site MANILA TOWN 2.75
5/22/2024 Work on rate study for Manila Off Site MANILA TOWN 1.25
5/22/2024 Work on rate study for Manila Off Site MANILA TOWN 2.50
5/23/2024 Work on rate study for Manila, discuss projects and progress w/Ron PierceOff Site MANILA TOWN 2.50
5/23/2024 Work on rate study and budget for Manila Off Site MANILA TOWN 3.00
5/23/2024 Call from Mike Johansen re: rules and regulations, system spec.sizing Off Site COTTONWOOD MUTUAL 0.75
5/24/2024 Talk w/Curt re: Big Water water rights and fees, review data Off Site BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 0.50
5/24/2024 Work on rate study for Manila Off Site MANILA TOWN 1.50
5/24/2024 Call from Dan, water op, re: compliance and projects Off Site BIG PLAINS/APPLE VLY (27069)0.50
5/24/2024 Work on rate study, budget and ability to pay for project Off Site KANOSH TOWN 2.50
5/24/2024 Talk w/Scott Anderson re: rate study and funding Off Site VERNON WATERWORKS 0.50
5/24/2024 Work on rate study, budget and ability to pay for project Off Site KANOSH TOWN 1.00
5/28/2024 Work on rate study Off Site KANOSH TOWN 2.00
5/28/2024 Finish up rate study for Kanosh, talk w/Collette re: funding Off Site KANOSH TOWN 1.50
5/28/2024 Work on rate study for Price Off Site PRICE CITY 0.50
5/28/2024 Call from Wes re: rate increase Off Site JOHNSON WATER DIST 0.50
5/28/2024 Work on rate study for Price Off Site PRICE CITY 2.00
5/29/2024 Review Wasatch Mobile Home Park data and email from Logan M.Off Site WASATCH MOBILE HOME PARK 0.50
5/29/2024 Prepare for Kanosh meeting w/engineer, Ben Coray Off Site KANOSH TOWN 1.00
5/29/2024 Work on rate study for Price Off Site PRICE CITY 1.00
5/29/2024 Work on rate study for Price Off Site PRICE CITY 0.50
5/29/2024 Review rate increase, funding, bond payments w/Ben Coray, Eng.Off Site KANOSH TOWN 0.50
5/29/2024 Work on asset management plan Off Site PINION FORREST (07073)1.00
Water is Life
5/30/2024 Review Ukon emergency information for emergency response Off Site UKON WATER CO 0.50
5/30/2024 Work on rate study for Price Off Site PRICE CITY 2.00
5/30/2024 Work on updating Genola's rate study to prepare for July meeting Off Site GENOLA TOWN 1.00
5/30/2024 Meet online w/Terry, Wes Handberg and Karen to discuss wrs Off Site JOHNSON WATER DIST 1.00
5/30/2024 Work on rate study for Price Off Site PRICE CITY 2.00
5/31/2024 Work on rate study for Price Off Site PRICE CITY 0.50
5/31/2024 Work on rate study for Price Off Site PRICE CITY 2.00
5/31/2024 Work on rate study for Price Off Site PRICE CITY 2.00
5/31/2024 Discuss Price City's rates, budget and project w/Curt L.Off Site PRICE CITY 0.75
5/31/2024 Work on rate study for Price Off Site PRICE CITY 0.75
Water is Life
Rural Water Association - DWB Report
Report Period: April, 2024
Curt Ludvigson - Development Specialist
Contract Goal Titles
Hours,
Current
Month
YTD Goal
Hours
Achieved
YTD Goal
Hours
Annual
Program
Goals
Agency Meetings 2 10 3 10
Aging Infrastructure Planning 9 24 3 10
Boards/Councils 5 28 21 64
Capacity Development Planning 16 31 8 24
Classroom Training 0 4 24 72
Compliance (Capacity Development)17 44 20 60
County Plannners 6 12 19 56
DDW & DE 0 0 0 71
DDW Interaction/Meetings 0 0 0 60
Finance (Capacity Development)45 114 91 272
Health Departments 0 0 0 64
HR/Cust Service (Capacity Development)0 2 10 30
Long Range Planning 0 0 12 36
Planning/Assets (Capacity Development)4 21 80 240
PWS Definition Training 0 0 1 4
Rules/Policies (Capacity Development)10 63 20 60
RWAU Conferences 0 0 0 36
Training Received 0 0 0 24
Totals:115 355 313 1,193
Water is Life
Report Period: April, 2024
Notable Assistance & Work Performed
System Description:
FAIRVIEW CITY Working with Fairview City on funding options for a project they need to do
MT PLEASANT CITY I met with the Mt Pleasant City Manager and discussed funding options for projects they need to do
LEVAN TOWN I met with the Public Works Director and the Mayor of Levan and discussed the progress they are making on the projects they are working on and also discussed their rates and budget and adjustments they need to make
BIG WATER MUNICIPAL Zoom Meeting with Big Water Town discussing Aging Infrastructure they need to replace
DESERET OASIS SSD Preparing a Cross Connection Program for Deseret Oasis
HATCH TOWN I met with the Town Clerk of Hatch Town and went over their budget and rates, getting additional information we need for their rate study
ALTON TOWN Meeting with the Alton Town Clerk working on a funding application
ORDERVILLE TOWN I met with the Operator and Clerk of Ordrville and discussed the project they are getting ready to do, and the application for the Drinking Water Board
HENRIEVILLE TOWN Attended Henrieville's Town Council Meeting and went over the rate study we have done for them.
HINCKLEY TOWN I met with the Hinckley Clerk and Operator and discussed the projects they need to do.
Central Utah Health Dept Meeting with the Central Utah Health Department concerning development that is going on in the areas and working on developing ordinances to deal with all the growth
Sevier County Planning CommissionAttended the Sevier County Planning Commission Meeting and discussed growth issues and how to better implement their Ordinances
GLENWOOD TOWN Proctoring a test for Preston Harward in Glenwood
TABIONA TOWN Preparing an RFP for Tabiona
COVERED BRIDGE CANYON I met with the Board of Covered Bridge to go over budgeting issues in preparation for their Annual Membership meeting tomorrow.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Water is Life
Rural Water Association of Utah
Water System Assistance Report
Report Month:April Total Work Hours:201.00
Contract
Curt Ludvigson
Hours Assisting Specific Systems:130.75
Employee:System assistance percentage of total working hours:65.05%
4/1/2024 Working on By-Laws for Deseret Oasis Off Site DESERET OASIS SSD 2.75
4/1/2024
Working on funding application for
Piute/Sevier Deer Creek Off Site PIUTE-SEVIER/DEER CR WTR 6.25
4/2/2024
Working with Fairview City on funding
options for a project they need to do On Site FAIRVIEW CITY 3.75
4/2/2024
I met with the Mt Pleasant City Manager
and discussed funding options for
projects they need to do On Site MT PLEASANT CITY 2.25
4/2/2024
I met with the Mayor of Spring City and
discussed Zoning and Land Management
issues On Site SPRING CITY 1.25
4/3/2024
I met with the Public Works Director and
the Mayor of Levan and discussed the
progress they are making on the projects
they are working on and also discussed
their rates and budget and adjustments
they need to make On Site LEVAN TOWN 2.00
4/3/2024
I met with the Mona Town Clerk and
discussed their budget and rates On Site MONA CITY 1.00
4/3/2024 Proctoring Preston Lunt in Nephi On Site NEPHI CITY WATER 3.00
4/4/2024
Working on Application for Piute/Sevier
Deer Creek Off Site PIUTE-SEVIER/DEER CR WTR 1.00
4/4/2024 Working on Application for Myton City Off Site MYTON CITY 6.50
4/5/2024
Zoom Meeting with Big Water Town
discussing Aging Infrastructure they need
to replace Off Site BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 3.00
4/5/2024
Preparing a Cross Connection Program
for Deseret Oasis Off Site DESERET OASIS SSD 5.50
4/8/2024
I met with the Mayor of Circleville and
discussed a project they need to do. He
will have me come explain everything to
the Council On Site CIRCLEVILLE WTR SYSTEM 1.50
4/9/2024
I met with the Town Clerk of Hatch Town
and went over their budget and rates,
getting additional information we need for
their rate study On Site HATCH TOWN 2.00
4/9/2024
I met with the Mayor and Town Clerk of
Big Water and discussed the information
we need for their rate study and we also
discussed the Aging Infrastructure On Site BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 3.00
4/9/2024
I met with the secretary of Clark Bench
and discussed the pending merge with
New Paria and Kane County WCD On Site CLARK BENCH (13060)1.25
4/10/2024
Meeting with the Alton Town Clerk
working on a funding application On Site ALTON TOWN 4.00
4/10/2024
I met with the Operator and Clerk of
Ordrville and discussed the project they
are getting ready to do, and the
application for the Drinking Water Board On Site ORDERVILLE TOWN 2.00
4/11/2024
I met with the Mayor of Antimony and
discussed the need they have for some
Board Training. We also discussed their
springs and the need for them to be
redeveloped.On Site ANTIMONY TOWN 2.25
4/11/2024
I met with Brett at Tropic Town and
discussed having me come down and
give the council some Board Training. I
also met with the new Town Clerk and
did some training for her on budgeting
and advertizing of notices, etc.On Site TROPIC TOWN 3.00
Water is Life
4/11/2024
Attended Henrieville's Town Council
Meeting and went over the rate study we
have done for them.On Site HENRIEVILLE TOWN 1.50
4/12/2024 Preparing an RFP for Hatch Town Off Site HATCH TOWN 4.00
4/12/2024
Working on an Ordinance for Big Water
to be able to dissolve the Water Board so
the Town Board is fully responsible for
the water system.Off Site BIG WATER MUNICIPAL 3.50
4/15/2024
I met with the Hinckley Clerk and
Operator and discussed the projects they
need to do.On Site HINCKLEY TOWN 2.00
4/15/2024
I met with the Councilmember who is
over the water system and we discussed
funding for projects they need to do.On Site LYNNDYL WATER 1.25
4/15/2024
I met with the Council member who is
over the water and we discussed their
rates and budget On Site OAK CITY 1.25
4/16/2024
I met with the Town Clerk of Sigurd and
discussed their budget and rates.On Site SIGURD TOWN WATER 1.50
4/16/2024
Worked with the Town Clerk of Loa on an
Ordinance I've been working on
regarding Out of Town water connections On Site LOA WATERWORKS 2.50
4/16/2024
Spent time with the Secretary of
Teasdale SSD reviewing a Resolution
regarding the length of time visitors can
stay using water from other connections.On Site TEASDALE SSD 1.50
4/17/2024
Meeting with the Central Utah Health
Department concerning development that
is going on in the areas and working on
developing ordinances to deal with all the
growth On Site Central Utah Health Dept 2.50
4/17/2024
Meetng with the District Engineer
discussing the ongoing growth issues
and various problems with keeping
everyone in compliance On Site District Engineers 2.00
4/17/2024
The Town Clerk asked me to come down
and review their rates and budget in
preparation for them getting the new
upcoming budget prepared. I made a
couple suggestions on their rates, but for
the most part, they are in good shape On Site ANNABELLA 2.25
4/17/2024
Attended the Sevier County Planning
Commission Meeting and discussed
growth issues and how to better
implement their Ordinances On Site Sevier County Planning Commission 2.00
4/22/2024
Working on upgrading an Ordinance the
Counties and Health Departments can
use to help them better manage growth Off Site Central Utah Health Dept 4.00
4/22/2024
Continued working on the Ordinance for
Health Departments and County
Planners Off Site Sevier County Planning Commission 4.00
4/23/2024 Working on an RFP for Teasdale SSD Off Site TEASDALE SSD 1.00
4/23/2024
Proctoring a test for Preston Harward in
Glenwood On Site GLENWOOD TOWN 2.50
4/23/2024
Continued working on the RFP for
Teasdale SSD Off Site TEASDALE SSD 3.00
4/24/2024
Working on funding application for Hatch
Town Off Site HATCH TOWN 4.00
4/24/2024 Preparing an RFP for Tabiona Off Site TABIONA TOWN 4.00
4/25/2024
Working with Elwood on preparing a
Cross Connection Control Program. We
also discussed their rate study that we
are working on.On Site ELWOOD TOWN 4.00
4/25/2024
I met with the Town Clerk and the
Operator and discussed the need they
have for an RFP. They are planning on
doing some projects On Site DEWEYVILLE WATER 1.75
4/26/2024 Preparing an RFP for Deweyville Off Site DEWEYVILLE WATER 4.00
Water is Life
4/26/2024
I met with the Utah County Health
Department and discussed the ongoing
problems in dealing with growth, and the
need they have for some updated
Ordinances, which I am working on.On Site UTAH COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1.75
4/26/2024
I met with the Board of Covered Bridge to
go over budgeting issues in preparation
for their Annual Membership meeting
tomorrow.On Site COVERED BRIDGE CANYON 1.25
4/29/2024
Working on an RFP and budget review
for North Emery Off Site NORTH EMERY WTR SSD 4.50
4/29/2024
Zoom meeting with Bridgerland Water
discussing their Aging Infrastructure and
ways to proceed in dealing with it Off Site BRIDGERLAND WATER CO 1.75
4/29/2024
I met with USDA Rural Development and
discussed funding for the Fairview Spring
project, particularly the ECWAG money,
and also the need to partner with DDW in
getting the funding needed On Site USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT 1.75
4/30/2024
Attended the Drinking Water Board
Meeting On Site DIV OF DRINKING WATER 2.50
Water is Life
Rural Water Association - DWB Report
Report Period: May, 2024
Curt Ludvigson - Development Specialist
Contract Goal Titles
Hours,
Current
Month
YTD Goal
Hours
Achieved
YTD Goal
Hours
Annual
Program
Goals
Agency Meetings 2 12 4 10
Aging Infrastructure Planning 0 24 4 10
Boards/Councils 8 36 27 64
Capacity Development Planning 14 45 10 24
Classroom Training 2 7 30 72
Compliance (Capacity Development)3 47 25 60
County Plannners 5 17 23 56
DDW & DE 0 0 0 71
DDW Interaction/Meetings 0 0 0 60
Finance (Capacity Development)45 159 113 272
Health Departments 0 0 0 64
HR/Cust Service (Capacity Development)0 2 13 30
Long Range Planning 4 4 15 36
Planning/Assets (Capacity Development)16 37 100 240
PWS Definition Training 0 0 2 4
Rules/Policies (Capacity Development)9 73 25 60
RWAU Conferences 0 0 0 36
Training Received 0 0 0 24
Totals:108 463 391 1,193
Water is Life
Report Period: May, 2024
Notable Assistance & Work Performed
System Description:
NORTH LOGAN CITY I met with North Logan City and discussed funding for a very large project. We had a teleconference meeting with Rural Water Finance Agency and also went over some of their financials.
CEDAR FORT WATER I met with the Cedar Fort Council and went over their financials and made some recommendations. We discussed the Earmark money they have received, and talked about engineering
COVERED BRIDGE CANYON I met with the Board of Covered Bridge to discuss the findings concerning their Water Rights that their engineer has found. They asked me to come and try to explain it to them. I was able to do so, and now they understand the totality of their water rights.
Utah County Planning Commission Working on Ordinance updates for the health Departments and Counties to use in better governing their development issues
HENRIEVILLE TOWN Had a followup meeting with the Town Clerk and Councilmember over the water of Henrieville. We discussed the progress they are making in getting the new rates adopted. We discussed the project they are planning and we went over their budget.
GLEN CANYON SSD I met with the Big Water Water Board and discussed the rate study we have done for them. I answered many questions and I think we finally have them in line with the increases they need to make. I will prepare the necessary Resolution for them to adopt at their next meeting
ORDERVILLE TOWN I met with the Town Clerk and discussed the project they hope to receive funding for from DDW in the next DDW Board Meeting
DESERET OASIS SSD Working on By-Laws for Deseret Oasis
FAIRVIEW CITY I met with the Public Work Director of Fairview and we had a teleconference with Rural Water Finance Agency where we discussed funding for their Spring projects and a new tank.
MT PLEASANT CITY I met with the City Manager of Mt Pleasant and had a similar teleconference with them and Rural Water Finance Agency. We discussed projects that may end up totaling $20 million or more. We discussed all the funding that may be available and the need to get funding from multiple sources
Central Utah Health Dept I met with officials of the Central Utah Health Department and discussed some of the issues in dealing with all the development in the areas. We discussed the large amount of growth in Juab County in particular and the problems they are having in keeping up with everything.
Central Valley Town I met with the Mayor of Central Town and discussed some ideas he has for projects they may want to do, and how to fund them
Sevier County Planning CommissionAttended the Sevier County Planning Commission Meeting and discussed the need for them to work closely with the Health Department in making sure the Ordinances are being followed.
Juab County Planning Commission I spent time with the Juab County Economic Development Director and a couple members of the Juab County Planning Commission. We toured much of the county and he explained the development that is going on, particularly with businesses. We discussed how the County needs to work with the Health Department in making sure the Ordinances are being followed. It was important for me to see and understand better, what is going on so I can assist the District Engineer and Health Department keep track of what is happening or what is being planned.
HOLDEN TOWN I met one of the Councilmembers and discussed their water rates. We talked of how important it is for them to be putting money aside in their Depreciation Fund, what it is meant for, and etc.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Water is Life
Rural Water Association of Utah
Water System Assistance Report
Report Month:May Total Work Hours:161.00
Contract
Curt Ludvigson
Hours Assisting Specific Systems:109.75
Employee:System assistance percentage of total working hours:68.17%
5/1/2024
Working on funding information for North
Logan Off Site NORTH LOGAN CITY 4.00
5/1/2024 Preparing an RFP for Newton Town Off Site NEWTON TOWN 4.00
5/2/2024
Continued my work on the By-Laws for
Deseret Oasis Off Site DESERET OASIS SSD 3.50
5/2/2024 Preparing an RFP for Clarkston Off Site CLARKSTON TOWN 3.50
5/3/2024
Phone call with the District Engineer in
the Uintah Basin discussing the
enforcement of Ordinances, or the lack
thereof Off Site District Engineers 1.50
5/3/2024
Phone call with North Emery Water Users
concerning a project they want to do and
the need for them to send out an RFP,
which I will prepare Off Site NORTH EMERY WTR SSD 1.00
5/3/2024 Preparing an RFP for North Emery SSD Off Site NORTH EMERY WTR SSD 3.50
5/3/2024
Working on funding information for
Fairview Off Site FAIRVIEW CITY 3.00
5/6/2024 Reviewing rates and budget for Price City Off Site PRICE CITY 4.00
5/6/2024 Reviewing rates for Elwood Off Site ELWOOD TOWN 2.50
5/7/2024
I met with North Logan City and
discussed funding for a very large
project. We had a teleconference
meeting with Rural Water Finance
Agency and also went over some of their
financials.On Site NORTH LOGAN CITY 2.50
5/7/2024
I delivered the RFP I had prepared for
Clarkston and discussed some projects
they are anticipating On Site CLARKSTON TOWN 1.00
5/7/2024
I delivered the RFP I had prepared for
Newton and we disucssed their rates and
funding options for a project they need to
do On Site NEWTON TOWN 1.25
5/8/2024
I met with the Davis County Health
Department and went over thier latest
Ordinance update in dealing with growth.
I made some recommendations for some
changes and also suggested that they
tighten up their own enforcement policies On Site DAVIS CO ENV HEALTH 2.00
5/8/2024
I met with the City Manager of Sunset
City and discussed their Planning and
Development issues. He wanted to have
me review their current Development
Ordinance and make some
recommendations.On Site SUNSET CITY 1.50
5/8/2024
Preparing for Cedar Fort's Council
Meeting, working on their Budget review Off Site CEDAR FORT WATER 2.00
5/8/2024
I met with the Cedar Fort Council and
went over their financials and made some
recommendations. We discussed the
Earmark money they have received, and
talked about engineering On Site CEDAR FORT WATER 2.00
5/9/2024
I met with the President and Secretary of
Wanship and discussed their project and
the funding package. We went over their
rates and budget and I suggested that
they need to make an increase in order to
assure that they will have adequate
revenues.On Site WANSHIP MUTUAL WTR CO 2.00
Water is Life
5/9/2024
I met with Summit County Service Area
#3 and discussed plans they have for a
project. They wanted to know where they
can get funding. We discussed their
MAGI, which they disagree with. We
discussed doing an income survey, but I
discouraged that because of poor results
in the past.On Site SUMMIT CO SERV AREA #3 1.75
5/9/2024
I met with the Oakley Town Clerk and
discussed they outcome of their project.
They seem pretty happy so far. We went
over their rates and discussed the need
to increase them as we had
recommended earlier. She may have me
come to a meeting and disucss this
further.On Site OAKLEY CITY 1.75
5/9/2024
I met with the Board of Covered Bridge to
discuss the findings concerning their
Water Rights that their engineer has
found. They asked me to come and try to
explain it to them. I was able to do so,
and now they understand the totality of
their water rights.On Site COVERED BRIDGE CANYON 2.00
5/10/2024
I met with the Utah County Health
Department and discussed the growth
issues and their need for constant
upgrades to their Development
Ordinances On Site UTAH COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1.50
5/10/2024
I met with the Eureka City Recorder and
discussed their budget. They know they
need to make some adjustments on their
water rates, but they don't seem very
willing to do so. We talked about having
us do a rate study for them, and she will
let me know.On Site EUREKA CITY 1.50
5/10/2024
I met with the Town Clerk and discussed
the success of their project. We looked
over their Budget and she wanted my
opinion of it before they officially adopt
next years budget. We discussed their
rates and the need to make some
adjustments, at least based on the
information I was given.On Site GENOLA TOWN 1.50
5/13/2024
Working on Ordinance updates for the
health Departments and Counties to use
in better governing their development
issues Off Site Utah County Planning Commission 3.00
5/14/2024
I had a meeting with the Secretary of
Teasdale SSD again and we went over
the RFP I had prepared for them. We
discussed the development that is going
on in the area with tourism. We
discussed a couple projects they are
anticipating On Site TEASDALE SSD 2.25
5/14/2024
I met with the Loa Town Clerk and went
over some of their Ordinances, seeing if
they address Out of Town water
connections. Since there isn't anything, I
will draft one for them.On Site LOA WATERWORKS 1.75
5/14/2024
I met with the Mayor and Clerk of
Koosharem and discussed their budget
and rates. I have done rate studies for
them in the past and they have never
followed up and adopted them.On Site KOOSHAREM WTR SYSTEM 1.25
5/15/2024
Had a followup meeting with the Town
Clerk and Councilmember over the water
of Henrieville. We discussed the
progress they are making in getting the
new rates adopted. We discussed the
project they are planning and we went
over their budget.On Site HENRIEVILLE TOWN 2.00
Water is Life
5/15/2024
I had a lunch meeting with the Mayor and
Opeator of Tropic. We discussed the
idea of expanding their Irrigation system
in order to make it so the Culinary water
will go farther.On Site TROPIC TOWN 1.75
5/15/2024
I met with the Mayor of Alton and
discussed the progress being made in
getting applications submitted for the
project they need to do on their springs.On Site ALTON TOWN 1.75
5/15/2024
I met with the Big Water Water Board and
discussed the rate study we have done
for them. I answered many questions
and I think we finally have them in line
with the increases they need to make. I
will prepare the necessary Resolution for
them to adopt at their next meeting On Site GLEN CANYON SSD 2.00
5/16/2024
I met with the Town Clerk and discussed
the project they hope to receive funding
for from DDW in the next DDW Board
Meeting On Site ORDERVILLE TOWN 1.50
5/16/2024
I met with the Glendale Town Clerk and
discussed the possible need they have
for a rate study.On Site GLENDALE TOWN CORP 1.50
5/16/2024
I met with the Panguitch City Manager
and discussed the events in dealing with
the broken dam at Panguitch Lake. That
could have really been a disaster.On Site PANGUITCH CITY 1.75
5/16/2024
I met with the Board of the Piute/Sevier
Deer Creek Water Company again. We
discussed the progress that has been
made in the past several months since I
have been working with them. We
discussed the updated By-Laws and how
they are working for them. We discussed
the application for meters and the various
projects that they need to accomplish.
This Board meets during the day when
their businesses are either closed or
during their slow time...just fyi.On Site PIUTE-SEVIER/DEER CR WTR 2.50
5/17/2024 Working on By-Laws for Deseret Oasis Off Site DESERET OASIS SSD 4.00
5/17/2024 Preparing an RFP for Junction Town Off Site JUNCTION TOWN 3.00
5/20/2024
I met with the Public Work Director of
Fairview and we had a teleconference
with Rural Water Finance Agency where
we discussed funding for their Spring
projects and a new tank.On Site FAIRVIEW CITY 1.50
5/20/2024
I met with the City Manager of Mt
Pleasant and had a similar
teleconference with them and Rural
Water Finance Agency. We discussed
projects that may end up totaling $20
million or more. We discussed all the
funding that may be available and the
need to get funding from multiple sources On Site MT PLEASANT CITY 1.75
5/20/2024
I assisted Moroni City in putting together
a better Cross Connection Control
Program than they have previously had.On Site MORONI CITY 1.75
5/20/2024
I met with the Mayor of Wales and
discussed another project he would like
to get completed on their springs. On Site WALES TOWN 1.25
5/21/2024
I met with officials of the Central Utah
Health Department and discussed some
of the issues in dealing with all the
development in the areas. We discussed
the large amount of growth in Juab
County in particular and the problems
they are having in keeping up with
everything.On Site Central Utah Health Dept 2.00
Water is Life
5/21/2024
I met with the Town Clerk of Glenwood
and went over their budget briefly and
discussed their rates. They think they
may need a rate study, but they will let
me know.On Site GLENWOOD TOWN 1.50
5/21/2024
I met with the secretary of the Austin
SSD and discussed their Cross
Connection Control Program and how I
can assist them in getting that
implemented and updated.On Site AUSTIN COM SSD 1.50
5/21/2024
I met with the Mayor of Central Town and
discussed some ideas he has for projects
they may want to do, and how to fund
them On Site Central Valley Town 1.25
5/21/2024
Attended the Sevier County Planning
Commission Meeting and discussed the
need for them to work closely with the
Health Department in making sure the
Ordinances are being followed.On Site Sevier County Planning Commission 1.50
5/22/2024
I spent time with the Juab County
Economic Development Director and a
couple members of the Juab County
Planning Commission. We toured much
of the county and he explained the
development that is going on, particularly
with businesses. We discussed how the
County needs to work with the Health
Department in making sure the
Ordinances are being followed. It was
important for me to see and understand
better, what is going on so I can assist
the District Engineer and Health
Department keep track of what is
happening or what is being planned.On Site Juab County Planning Commission 4.00
5/22/2024
Working on Funding Application for
Fairview Off Site FAIRVIEW CITY 2.50
5/23/2024
I met with some of the Public Works
people and discussed their plans for
upgrades to the system. We discussed
possibly a new tank and some work on
the Distribution System On Site DELTA CITY 1.50
5/23/2024
I met one of the Councilmembers and
discussed their water rates. We talked of
how important it is for them to be putting
money aside in their Depreciation Fund,
what it is meant for, and etc.On Site HOLDEN TOWN 1.75
5/23/2024
I met with the Council of Scipio in a Work
Meeting and discussed a project they are
trying to get going on. It seems like things
are kind of at a stand still. I made some
suggestions and offered to help anyway I
can.On Site SCIPIO TOWN 1.25
Agenda Item
7(A)
DRINKING WATER BOARD PACKET
(Request to Adopt Rule) R309-515 Facility Design and Operation: Source Development
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
June 25, 2024

PROPOSAL: The Division of Drinking Water made the substantive changes to R309-515-6(4) to delete special
construction requirements for sewer mains, laterals, and maintenance holes located in Source
Protection Zone 2.

The Division made nonsubstantive changes throughout the R309-515 to comply with Rulewriting
Manual for Utah and deleted references to parts of R309-540 in R309-515-5(5)(f), R309-515-6(13),
and R309-515-6(13)(e) which will no longer be accurate when R309-540 is revised by a separate
rulemaking proposal.

The public comment period ended on May 1, 2024, and the Division did not receive any comments on
the proposed rule revision.

HISTORY/CONTEXT:
The proposed amendment to R309-515-6(4) deletes special construction requirements for sewer
mains, laterals, and maintenance holes located in Source Protection Zone 2 but retains them for Source Protection Zone 1. The current requirements can rarely be met, and the division frequently
must issue exceptions to the rule requirements, which the division believes are unnecessary to
provide protection of groundwater sources in Zone 2.
The proposed amendment to R309-515-6(4) also clarifies that the special construction requirements
apply to sewer mains and laterals carrying wastewater from a building to a public sewer, septic
system, or wastewater dispersal system and clarifies that the special construction requirements
don' t apply to floor drains.
The proposed amendment deletes Subsection R309-515-6(4)(h), which currently requires, as a special construction requirement, an impermeable cutoff wall along the upgradient edge of sewer
trenches in Source Protection Zone 1 for protected aquifers and in Source Protection Zone 2 for
unprotected aquifers. The requirement would no longer apply to sewer lines and laterals in Zone 2
because all special construction requirements are being deleted. The division also believes this requirement is overly restrictive and unnecessary for the protection of groundwater sources in
Zone 1.
The proposed rule has been distributed within the Division and to public water systems, consultants, and others for review. The Division has considered all comments received and revised
the rule as necessary. The proposed rule has also been pre-filed with the Office of Administrative
Rules for review as required by Executive Order 2021-12, Establishing Effective Oversight Over
State Agency Rulemaking, issued by Governor Cox on May 6, 2021.

DIVISION STAFF/DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION:
The Division recommends that the Drinking Water Board adopt the amendment to R309-515-5
and -6 and instruct Division staff to file the appropriate action with the Office of Administrative
Rules (OAR).

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
Request Drinking Water Board Approval to File Proposed Rule:
Deadline to File Proposed Rule with OAR: Publication of Proposed Rule in Utah State Bulletin:
End of 30-Day Comment Period (no comments received):
Return to Request Board Approval to Adopt Rule:
File Notice of Effective Date with OAR:
Anticipated Effective Date of Proposed Rule:

02/29/2024
03/15/2024 04/01/2024
05/01/2024
06/25/2024
06/26/2024
06/26/2024

COST ESTIMATE:
The Division anticipates that the proposed rule amendment will have no aggregate cost or savings
to the state budget, local governments, small businesses, non-small businesses, or other persons.

The proposed rule amendment is expected to have no compliance costs for affected persons, which are public water suppliers that plan to construct a groundwater source in which sewer lines or
laterals are present in Source Protection Zones 1 or 2, because the amendment does not impose
any new requirements.
R309. Environmental Quality, Drinking Water. R309-515. Facility Design and Operation: Source Development. R309-515-1. Purpose. This rule specifies requirements for public drinking water sources. [ ]It is intended to be applied in conjunction with Rules R309-500 through R309-550.[ ] Collectively, these rules govern the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of public drinking water system facilities. [ ]These rules are intended to assure that such facilities are reliably capable of supplying adequate quantities of water that consistently meet applicable drinking water quality requirements and do not pose a threat to general public health. R309-515-2. Authority. This rule is promulgated by the Drinking Water Board as authorized by Title 19, [Environmental Quality Code, ]Chapter 4, Safe Drinking Water Act, Subsection 104(1)(a)(ii[) of the Utah Code Annotated]), and in accordance with Title 63G- Chapter 3[ of the same, known as the], Administrative Rulemaking Act.
R309-515-3. Definitions. Definitions for certain terms used in this rule are given in Rule R309-110 but may be further clarified
[herein]in Sections R309-515-4 through R309-515-8. R309-515-4. General.
(1) Issues to be Considered. The selection, development, and operation of a public drinking water source must be done in a manner that will protect public health and assure that [all ]required water quality standards, as described in Rule R309-200, are met. (2) Communication with the Division. Because of the issues described [above ]in Subsection R309-515-4(1), engineers are advised to work closely with the Division to help assure that sources are properly sited, developed, and operated. (3) Number of Sources and Quantity Requirements. Community water systems serving more than 100 connections shall have a minimum of two sources, except where served by a surface water treatment plant. [ ]For [all systems]each system, the total developed source capacity shall equal or exceed the peak day demand of the system. [ ]Refer to Section R309-510-7 of these rules for procedure to estimate the peak day demand. (4) Quality Requirements. In selecting a source of water for development, the designing engineer shall demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the Director that the source[(s)] selected for use in public water systems are of satisfactory quality, or can be treated in a manner so that the quality requirements of Rule R309-200 can be met. (5) Initial Analyses.
[All new]New drinking water sources, unless otherwise noted [below,]in Subsections R309-515-4(5)(a) through (f), shall be analyzed for[ the following]: (a) [all]each of the primary and secondary inorganic contaminants listed in Rule R309-200, Table 200-1
and Table 200-5[ (], excluding Asbestos unless it would be required by Subsection R309-205-5(2[));]); (b) Ammonia as N; Boron; Calcium; Copper; Lead; Magnesium; Potassium; Turbidity, as NTU; Specific Conductivity at 25 degrees Celsius, micro mhos/cm; Bicarbonate; Carbon Dioxide; Carbonate; Hydroxide; Phosphorous, Ortho as P; Silica, dissolved as SiO2; Surfactant as MBAS; Total Hardness as CaCO3; and Alkalinity as CaCO3; (c) pesticides, PCBs, and SOCs as listed in Subsection R309-200-5(3)(a), Table 200-2 unless the system is a transient non-community PWS or, if a community PWS or non-transient non-community PWS, has received waivers in accordance with Subsection R309-205-6(1)(f).[ ] The following six constituents have been excused from monitoring in the [S]state by the EPA, dibromochloropropane, ethylene dibromide, Diquat, Endothall, glyphosate and Dioxin; (d) VOCs as listed in Subsection R309-200-5(3)(b), Table 200-3 unless the system is a transient non-
community PWS; and[,]
(e) radiologic chemicals as listed in Subsection R309-200-5(4)[ ] unless the system is a non-transient non-community PWS or a transient non-community PWS.
[All](f) Every analys[e]is shall be performed by a certified laboratory as required by Section R309-205-4 [(]Specially prepared sample bottles are required[),]. (6) Source Classification. Subsection R309-505-7(1)(a)(i) provides information on the classification of water sources. [ ]The Director shall classify [all]each existing or new source[s] as either: (a) surface water or [ground water]groundwater under direct influence of surface water which requires conventional surface water treatment or an approved equivalent; or as[,] (b) [ground water]groundwater not under the direct influence of surface water. (7) Latitude and Longitude. The latitude and longitude, to at least the nearest second, or the location by section, township, range, and course and distance from an established outside section corner or quarter corner of each point of diversion shall be
submitted to the Director [prior to]before source approval. R309-515-5. Surface Water Sources.
(1) Definition. A surface water source, as is defined in Rule R309-110, shall include[, but not be limited, to] tributary systems, drainage basins, natural lakes, artificial reservoirs, impoundments, and springs or wells that have been
classified as being directly influenced by surface water. [ ]Surface water sources will not be considered for culinary use unless they can be [rendered]made acceptable by conventional surface water treatment or other equivalent treatment techniques acceptable to the Director. (2) Pre-design Submittal. The following information must be submitted to the Director and approved in writing before commencement of design of diversion structures [and/]or water treatment facilities: (a) a copy of the chemical analyses required by Rule R309-200 and described in Subsection R309-515-4(5[) above;]); and[,] (b) a survey of the watershed tributary to the watercourse along which diversion structures are proposed. [ ]The survey shall include[, but not be limited to]: (i) determining possible future uses of impoundments or reservoirs; (ii) the present stream classification by the Division of Water Quality, any obstacles to having a stream[(s)] reclassified 1C, and determining degree of watershed control by owner or other agencies; (iii) assessing degree of hazard to the supply by accidental spillage of materials that may be toxic,
harmful or detrimental to treatment processes; (iv) obtaining samples over a sufficient period[ of time] to assess the microbiological, physical, chemical and radiological characteristics and variations of the water;
(v) assessing the capability of the proposed treatment process to reduce contaminants to applicable standards; and[,] (vi) consideration of currents, wind and ice conditions, and the effect of tributary streams at their
confluence. (3) Pre-construction Submittal. Following approval of a surface water source, the following additional information must be submitted for review and approval [prior to commencement of]before starting construction: (a) acceptable evidence that the water system has a legal right to divert water for the proposed uses from the proposed sources; (b) minimum quantity that the surface water source [is capable of producing (]can produce, see Subsection R309-515-5(4)(a[) below]); and (c) complete plans and specifications and supporting documentation for the proposed treatment facilities to ascertain compliance with Rules R309-525 or R309-530. (4) Quantity.
The quantity of water from surface sources shall:
(a) be assumed to be no greater than the low flow of a 25-year recurrence interval or the low flow of record for these sources when 25 years of records are not available;
(b) meet or exceed the anticipated peak day demand for water as estimated in Section R309-510-7 and provide a reasonable surplus for anticipated growth; and[,] (c) be [adequate]enough to compensate for[ all] losses such as silting, evaporation, seepage, and sludge disposal, which would be anticipated in the normal operation of the treatment facility. (5) Diversion Structures. Design of intake structures shall provide for: (a) withdrawal of water from more than one level if quality varies with depth; (b) intake of the lowest withdrawal elevation located at sufficient depth to be kept submerged at the low water elevation of the reservoir; (c) separate facilities for release of less desirable water held in storage; (d) occasional cleaning of the inlet line;
(e) a diversion device capable of keeping large quantities of fish or debris from entering an intake structure; and[,] (f) suitable protection of pumps where used to transfer diverted water[ (refer to R309-540-5).].
(6) Impoundments. The design of an impoundment reservoir shall provide for, where applicable: (a) removal of brush and trees to the high water level;
(b) protection from floods during construction; (c) abandonment of [all]every well[s], which may be inundated[ (], refer to applicable requirements of the Division of Water Rights[);]; and[,] (d) adequate precautions to limit nutrient loads. R309-515-6. [Ground Water]Groundwater - Wells. (1) Required Treatment. If properly developed, water from wells may be suitable for culinary use without treatment. A determination concerning whether treatment may be required can only be made after the source has been developed and evaluated. (2) Standby Power. Water suppliers shall assess the capability of their system in the event of a power outage. If a community water system has no naturally flowing water sources such as springs or flowing wells, one or more of the system's sources shall be equipped for operation during power outages. In this event:
(a) to ensure continuous service when the primary power has been interrupted, a redundant power supply shall be provided. [ ]A redundant power supply may include a transfer switch for auxiliary power such as a generator or a power supply service with coverage from two independent substations.
(b) when automatic pre-lubrication of pump bearings is necessary, and an auxiliary power supply is provided, the pre-lubrication line shall be provided with a valved by-pass around the automatic control, or the automatic control shall be wired to the emergency power source.
(3) The Utah Division of Water Rights. The Utah Division of Water Rights[ (], State Engineer's Office[)], regulates the drilling of water wells. Before the drilling of a well commences, the well driller must receive a start card from the State Engineer's Office. For public drinking water supply wells, [the r]Rule[s of] R655-4 appl[y]ies and shall be followed in addition to th[ese]is rule[s]. (4) Source Protection. Public drinking water systems are responsible for protecting their sources from contamination. The selection of a well location shall only be made after consideration of the requirements of Rule R309-600. Sources shall be located in an area that will minimize threats from existing or potential sources of pollution. [Generally, sewer lines may not be located within zone one and zone two of ](a) A public [drinking ]water [system's]system shall not develop a new groundwater source [protection zones. However, ]if existing
sewer infrastructure, including sewer lines, sewer laterals, or sewer maintenance holes, exist within the [following
precautions]boundaries of source protection zone one. For purposes of this section, floor drains are [taken, sewer lines may be permitted within a public drinking water system's source protection zone one and zone two. Sewer
lines shall meet the]not considered to be applicable sewer infrastructure. (b) The Director may approve, as a permit order under Section 19-1-301.5, new groundwater sources if the conditions identified in Subsection R309-600-13(3[), and shall be]) are met and each applicable sewer infrastructure, carrying wastewater from a building or home to a public sewer or an onsite wastewater system, located within source protection zone one is specially constructed as follows[ throughout zone one in aquifers classified as protected, and zones one and two, if the aquifer is classified as unprotected.]: ([a]i) Sewer lines shall be constructed to remain watertight. [ ]The lines shall be deflection-tested in accordance with [the Division of Water Quality ]Rule R317-3. [ ]The lines shall be video-inspected for any defect [following]after completion of construction and before being placed in service. [ ]The sewer pipe material shall be: ([i]A) high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe with a PE3408 or PE4710 rating from the Plastic Pipe
Institute and have a Standard Dimension Ratio (SDR) of 17 or less, and [all joints]each joint shall be fusion-welded; or[,] ([ii]B) polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe meeting AWWA Specification C900 or C905 and have a DR of 18
or less. [ ]PVC pipe shall be either restrained gasketed joints or shall be fusion-welded. [ ]Solvent cement joints shall not be acceptable.[ ] The PVC pipe shall be clearly identified when installed, by marking tape or other means as a sanitary sewer line; or[,]
([iii]C) ductile iron pipe with ceramic epoxy lining, polyethylene encasement, restrained joints, and a minimum pressure class of 200. ([b]ii) Procedures for leakage tests shall be [specified]named and comply with [Division of Water Quality ]Rule R317-3[ requirements]. ([c]iii) Lateral to [main]sewer line connection shall be fusion-welded, shop-fabricated, or saddled with a mechanical clamping watertight device designed for the specific pipe. ([d]iv) Inlet and outlet sewer pipes shall be joined to a [manhole]maintenance hole with a gasketed flexible watertight connection. ([e]v) The sewer pipe shall be laid with no greater than 2[ percent]% deflection at any joint. ([f]vi) Backfill shall be compacted to not less than 95[ percent]% of maximum laboratory density as determined in accordance with ASTM Standard D-690. ([g]vii) Sewer [manholes]maintenance hole shall meet [the following]Subsections R309-515-6(4)(b)(vii)(A) through (C) requirements. ([i]A) The [manholes]maintenance hole shall be constructed of reinforced concrete, HDPE, or approved
equivalent. [ (ii) Manhole] (B) Maintenance hole base and walls, up to a point at least 12 inches above the top of the upper most sewer pipe entering the [manhole]maintenance hole, shall be fabricated in a single concrete pour
without joints. ([iii]C) The [manholes]maintenance hole shall be air pressure tested after installation. [ (h) In unprotected aquifers, an impermeable cutoff wall shall be constructed in all sewer trenches on the
up-gradient edge of zone two. In protected aquifers, an impermeable cutoff wall shall be constructed in all sewer trenches on the up-gradient edge of zone one. ] (5) Outline of Well Approval Process. (a) Well drilling shall not [commence]begin until both of the following items are submitted and receive a favorable review: (i) a Preliminary Evaluation Report on source protection issues as required by Section R309-600-13[,]; and (ii) engineering plans and specifications governing the well drilling, prepared by a licensed well driller holding a current Utah Well Drillers License or prepared, signed, and stamped by a licensed professional engineer or professional geologist licensed to practice in Utah. (b) Inspection of Well Sealing During Construction.
(i) Authorized Individuals
(A) The following individuals are authorized to witness the well sealing procedure for a public drinking water well:
(I) an engineer or a geologist from the Division of Drinking Water; (II) a district engineer of the Department of Environmental Quality; (III) an authorized representative of the Division of Water Rights; or[,] (IV) an individual having written authorization from the Director and meeting the [below listed ]criteria[.] in Subsection R309-515-6(5)(b)(ii). (B) [At the time of]During the well sealing, an individual, who is authorized per [(]Subsection R515-6(5)(b)(i)(A)(IV), shall present to the well driller a copy of the authorization letter [authorizing him or her ]to witness a well sealing on behalf of the Division of Drinking Water.[ ] A copy of this letter shall be appended to the witness certification letter. (C) At least three days before the anticipated well sealing, the well driller shall arrange for an authorized witness listed in [(]Subsection R515-6(5)(b)(i)(A) [above ]to witness the procedure. [ (]See Subsection R309-515-
6(6[)(i)).]). (ii) Obtaining Authorization (A) To be authorized per [(]Subsection R515-6(5)(b)(i)(A)(IV)[ above] to witness a well sealing
procedure, an individual must have no relationship to the driller or the well's owner. The individual must have at least five years professional experience designing wells, supervising well drilling, or other equivalent experience associated with well drilling or well sealing that is acceptable to the Director.
(B) Individuals, desiring the Director's authorization to witness a well sealing procedure, shall provide the following information to the Director for review[ over his or her signature], signed and attesting to the correctness of the information: (I) a detailed description of the applicant's experience with well drilling projects, including number of years of experience and type of work. [ ]Three references confirming this professional experience are required. (II) evidence of licensure as a professional engineer or professional geologist in Utah. (III) no relationship may exist between a person authorized to witness well sealings and a well driller that would serve as the basis for suspicion of favoritism, leniency, or punitive action in the performance of this task. Examples of such relationships would be family; former long-term employment associations; business partnerships, either formal or informal[; etc. ]. The Director's decision, with right of appeal as provided in Rule R305-7, shall be accepted relative to what constitutes a conflict of interest or a relationship sufficient to disqualify an applicant from [all or specific]any witness opportunities. (IV) An acknowledg[e]ment that [he/she]the individual would not be acting as an agent or employee of the State of Utah and any losses incurred while acting as a witness would not be covered by governmental
immunity or Utah's insurance. ([VI]V) Willingness to follow established protocols and attend such training events as may be required by the Director.
(VI[I]) Complete with a minimum 75[ percent]% passing grade, an examination on water well drilling rules, as offered by the Division of Water Rights. (C) The Director may rescind the authorization if an individual fails to comply with the criteria or
conditions of the authorization[ listed above]. (iii) Well Seal Certification The individual witnessing the well sealing procedure shall provide a signed letter, including the following information, to the Director within 30 days of the well sealing: (A) certification that the well sealing procedure met [all the requirements]every requirement of [Rule]Subsection R309-515-6(6)(i); (B) the water right under which the well was drilled and the well driller's license number; (C) the public water system name[ (], if applicable[);]; (D) the latitude and longitude of the well and method used for its determination; (E) the well head's approximate elevation; (F) casing diameter[(s),], length[(s),], and material[(s);];
(G) the size of the annulus between the borehole and casing;
(H) a description of the sealing process including the sealing material used, its volume, density, method of placement, and depth from surface; and[,]
(I) the names and company affiliations of other individuals observing the sealing procedure including, [but not limited to, ]the well driller, the well owner, [and/]or a consultant. (c) After completion of the well drilling, the following information shall be submitted and receive a favorable review before water from the well can be introduced into a public water system: (i) a copy of the ["]Report of Well Driller["] as required by the State Engineer's Office which is complete in [all aspects]every aspect and has been stamped as received by the same; (ii) a copy of the letter from the authorized individual described in Subsection R309-515-6(5)(b[) above,]), indicating inspection and confirmation that the well was grouted in accordance with the well drilling specifications and the requirements of this rule; (iii) a copy of the aquifer drawdown test data, as a minimum, including the yield versus drawdown test data, as described in Subsection R309-515-6(10)(b) along with comments and interpretation by a licensed
professional engineer or licensed professional geologist of the graphic drawdown information required by Subsection R309-515-6(10)(b)(vi)(E); (iv) a copy of the chemical analyses required by Subsection R309-515-4(5);
(v) acceptable evidence that the water system owner has a legal right to divert water for the proposed use[(s)] from the well source[(s);]; (vi) a copy of complete plans and specifications prepared, signed, and stamped by a licensed professional
engineer covering the well housing, equipment, and diversion piping necessary to introduce water from the well into the distribution system; and (vii) a bacteriological analysis of water obtained from the well after installation of permanent equipment, disinfection, and flushing. (d) An Operation Permit shall be obtained in accordance with Section R309-500-9 before any water from the well is introduced into a public water system. (6) Well Materials, Design, and Construction. (a) ANSI/NSF Standards 60 and 61 Certification. [All i]Interior surfaces must consist of products complying with ANSI/NSF Standard 61. [ ]This requirement applies to drop pipes, well screens, coatings, adhesives, solders, fluxes, pumps, switches, electrical wire, sensors, and [all]any other equipment or surfaces which may contact the drinking water. [All s]Substances introduced into the well during construction or development shall be certified to comply with ANSI/NSF Standard 60. [ ]This requirement applies to drilling fluids[ (], including biocides, clay thinners, defoamers, foamers, loss circulation materials, lubricants, oxygen scavengers, viscosifiers, weighting agents,[)]
and regenerants. (b) Permanent Steel Casing Pipe shall: (i) be new single steel casing pipe meeting AWWA Standard A-100, ASTM or API specifications and
having a minimum weight and thickness as given in Table 6 found in [R655-4-11.2.3 of the Utah Administrative Code (Administrative Rules for Water Well Drillers, adopted April 11, 2011, Division of Water Rights);]Subsection R655-4-11(11.2.3);
(ii) have additional thickness and weight, if minimum thickness is not considered sufficient to assure reasonable life expectancy of the well; (iii) be capable of withstanding forces to which it is subjected; (iv) be equipped with a drive shoe when driven; (v) have full circumferential welds or threaded coupling joints; and (vi) project at least 18 inches above the anticipated final ground surface and at least 12 inches above the anticipated pump house floor level. [ ]At sites subject to flooding, the top of the well casing shall terminate at least three feet above the 100-year flood level or the highest known flood elevation, whichever is higher. (c) Non-Ferrous Casing Material. The use of any non-ferrous material for a well casing shall receive prior approval of the Director based on the ability of the material to perform its desired function. [ ]Thermoplastic water well casing pipe shall meet
AWWA Standard A100-06 and shall bear the logo NSF-wc indicating compliance with NSF Standard 14 for use
as well casing. (d) Disposal of Cuttings.
Cuttings and waste from well drilling operations shall not be discharged into a waterway, lake, or reservoir. The rules of the Utah Division of Water Quality must be observed with respect to these discharges. (e) Packers. Packers, if used, shall be of material that will not impart taste, odor, toxic substances, or bacterial contamination to the well water. Lead or partial lead packers are specifically prohibited. (f) Screens. The use of well screens is recommended where appropriate and, if used, they shall: (i) be constructed of material resistant to damage by chemical action of groundwater or cleaning operations; (ii) have size of openings based on sieve analysis of formations or gravel pack materials; (iii) have sufficient diameter to provide adequate specific capacity and low aperture entrance velocities;
(iv) be installed so that the operating water level remains above the screen under [all]any pumping conditions; and[,] (v) be provided with a bottom plate or wash-down bottom fitting of the same material as the screen.
(g) Plumbness and Alignment Requirements. Every well shall be tested for plumbness and vertical alignment in accordance with AWWA Standard A100. [ ]Plans and specifications submitted for review shall:
(i) have the test method and allowable tolerances clearly stated in the specifications; and[,] (ii) clearly [indicate]state any options the design engineer may have if the well fails to meet the requirements. Generally, wells may be accepted if the misalignment does not interfere with the installation or operation of the pump or uniform placement of grout. (h) Casing Perforations. The placement of perforations in the well casing shall: (i) be located, as far as practical, to permit the uniform collection of water around the circumference of the well casing; and[,] (ii) be of dimensions and size to restrain the water bearing soils from entrance into the well. (i) Well Sealing Techniques and Requirements. For [all]each public drinking water well[s], the annulus between the outermost well casing and the borehole wall shall be sealed with grout to a depth of at least 100 feet below the ground surface unless an ["]exception["] is issued by the Director[ (], see Subsection R309-500-4(1[)). ]). If more than one casing is used, including a conductor casing, the annulus between the outermost casing and the next inner casing shall be sealed
with grout[ (], meeting the sealing materials requirements of Subsection R309-515-6(i)(ii[) herein]) or with a water tight steel ring having a thickness equal to that of the permanent well casing and continuously welded to both casings. [ ]If a public drinking water well will be equipped with a pitless adapter or unit, a well seal shall be
installed to a minimum depth of 110 feet to [take into ]account for the top 10 feet of compromised seal interval. The following shall apply to [all]each drinking water well[s]: (i) Consideration During Well Construction.
(A) Sufficient annular opening shall be provided to permit a minimum of two inches of grout between the outermost permanent casing and the drilled hole, taking into consideration any joint couplings. (B) The casing[(s)] must be placed to permit unobstructed flow and uniform thickness of grout. (ii) Sealing Materials. (A) Neat Cement Grout. Cement, conforming to ASTM Standard C150, and water, with no more than six gallons of water per sack of cement, shall be used for two-inch openings. [ ]Additives may be used to increase fluidity subject to approval by the Director. (B) Concrete Grout. Equal parts of cement conforming to ASTM Standard C150, and sand, with no[t] more than six gallons of water per sack of cement, may be used for openings larger than two inches.
(C) Clay Seal.
Where an annular opening greater than six inches is available, a seal of swelling bentonite meeting the requirements of Subsection R655-4-11(11.4.2) may be used when approved by the Director.
(iii) Application. (A) When the annular opening is less than four inches, grout shall be installed under pressure[, by means of] using a positive displacement grout pump, from the bottom of the annular opening to be filled. (B) When the annular opening is four or more inches and 100 feet or less in depth, and concrete grout is used, it may be placed by gravity through a grout pipe installed to the bottom of the annular opening in one continuous operation until the annular opening is filled. (C) [All]Every temporary construction casing[s] shall be removed [prior to]before or during the well sealing operation.[ ] Any exceptions shall be approved by the State Engineer's Office, and evidence of State Engineer's Office's approval shall be submitted to the Director, [(s]See Subsection R655-4-11(11.4.3.1) for conditions concerning leaving temporary surface casing in place[). ]. A temporary construction casing is a casing not intended to be part of the permanent well.
(D) When a ["]well in a protected aquifer["] classification is desired, the grout seal shall extend from the ground surface down to at least 100 feet below the surface, and through the protective clay layer[ (see]. See Subsection R309-600-6([1)(x)).]23).
(E) After cement grouting is applied, work on the well shall be discontinued until the cement or concrete grout has properly set, usually a period of 72 hours. (j) Water Entered [I]into Well During Construction.
Any water entering a well during construction shall not be contaminated and should be obtained from a chlorinated municipal system. Where this is not possible, the water must be treated to produce a 100 mg/l free chlorine residual in accordance with Subsection R655-4-11(11.6.5). (k) Gravel Pack Wells. The following shall apply to gravel packed wells: (i) the gravel pack material shall be of well-rounded particles, at least 90[ percent]% siliceous material, no more than [five percent]5% acid solubility, smooth and uniform, free of foreign material, properly sized, washed, and then disinfected immediately [prior to]before or during placement; (ii) the gravel pack shall be placed in one uniform continuous operation; (iii) refill pipes, when used, shall be Schedule 40 steel pipe incorporated within the pump foundation and terminated with screwed or welded caps at least 12 inches above the pump house floor or concrete apron; (iv) refill pipes located in the grouted annular opening shall be surrounded by a minimum of 1.5 inches of grout; (v) protection shall be provided to prevent leakage of grout into the gravel pack or screen; and[,]
(vi) any casings not withdrawn entirely shall meet requirements of Subsection R309-515-6(6)(b) or Subsection R309-515-6(6)(c). (7) Well Development.
(a) Every well shall be developed to remove the native silts and clays, drilling mud, or finer fraction of the gravel pack. (b) Development should continue until the maximum specific capacity is obtained from the completed
well. (c) Where chemical conditioning is required, the specifications shall include provisions for the method, equipment, chemicals, testing for residual chemicals, and disposal of waste and inhibitors. (d) Where blasting procedures may be used, the specifications shall include the provisions for blasting and cleaning. [ ]Special attention shall be given to assure that the grouting and casing are not damaged by the blasting. (8) Capping Requirements. (a) The well shall be securely capped in accordance with Subsection R655-4-14(14.1) until permanent equipment can be installed. (b) [At all times]Continually, during the progress of work, the contractor shall provide protection to prevent tampering with the well or entrance of foreign materials.
(9) Well Abandonment.
(a)Test wells and groundwater sources, which will be permanently abandoned shall be abandoned inaccordance with Section R655-4-14.
(b) Wells to be abandoned shall be sealed to prevent undesirable exchange of water from one aquifer toanother. [ ]Preference shall be given to using a neat cement grout.[ ] Where fill materials are used, which are other than cement grout or concrete, they shall be disinfected and free of foreign materials. [ ]When an abandoned well is filled with [cement-grout]cementgrout or concrete, these materials shall be applied to the well- hole through a pipe, tremie, or bailer. (10) Well Assessment.(a)Step Drawdown Test.Preliminary to the constant-rate test required [below]in Subsection R309-515-6(10)(b), it is recommendedthat a [step-drawdown]stepdrawdown test[ (], which is uniform increases in pumping rates over uniform time intervals with single drawdown measurements taken at the end of the intervals[)], be conducted to determine the maximum pumping rate for the desired intake setting.
(b)Constant-Rate Test.A ["]constant-rate["] yield and drawdown test shall:(i)be performed on every production well after well development and [prior to]before placement of the
permanent pump; (ii) have the test methods clearly indicated in the specifications;(iii)have a test pump with sufficient capacity that when pumped against the maximum anticipated
drawdown, it will be capable of pumping [in excess of]more than the desired design discharge rate; (iv)provide for continuous pumping for at least 24 hours or until stabilized drawdown has continued forat least six hours when test pumped at a ["]constant-rate["] equal to the desired design discharge rate; (v)provide the following data:(A)capacity vs. head characteristics for the test pump[ (], manufacturer's pump curve[);];(B)static water level[ (], in feet to the nearest tenth, as measured from an identified datum; usually thetop of casing[);]; (C)depth of test pump intake; and[,](D)time and date of starting and ending test[(s);];(vi)For the ["]constant-rate["] test, provide the following at time intervals sufficient for at least tenessentially uniform intervals for each log cycle of the graphic evaluation required [below:]in Subsection R309-515-6(10)(b)(vi)(A) through Subsection R309-515-6(10)(b)(vi)(E):(A)record the time since starting test [(]in minutes[);];(B)record the [actual] pumping rate;
(C)record the pumping water level[ (], in feet to the nearest tenth, as measured from the same datumused for the static water level[);]; (D)record the drawdown[ (], which is the pumping water level minus static water level in feet to the
nearest tenth[);]; (E)provide graphic evaluation on semi-logarithmic graph paper by plotting the drawdown measurementson the arithmetic scale at locations corresponding to time since starting test on the logarithmic scale; and[,]
(vii)Immediately after termination of the constant-rate test, and [for a period of time ]until there are nochanges in depth to water level measurements for at least six hours, record the following at time intervals similar to those used during the constant-rate pump test: (A)time since stopping pump test [(]in minutes[),];(B)depth to water level[ (], in feet to the nearest tenth, as measured from the same datum used for thepumping water level[).]. (c)Safe Yield.If the aquifer drawdown test data show that the drawdown has stabilized, the Director will consider 2/3 ofthe pumping rate used in the constant-rate test as the safe yield of the well. [ ]The safe yield is used to determine the number of permanent residential connections or ERCs that a well source can support. (11) Well Disinfection.
Every new, modified, or reconditioned well including pumping equipment shall be disinfected before
being placed into service for drinking water use. [ ]These shall be disinfected according to AWWA Standards C654-03 and A100-06 as modified to incorporate the following as a minimum standard:
[(i](a) the well shall be disinfected with a chlorine solution of sufficient volume and strength and so applied that a concentration of at least 50 parts per million is obtained in [all parts]every part of the well and the equipment installed in the well.[ ] This solution shall remain in the well for a period of at least eight hours; and[,] [(ii](b) a satisfactory bacteriologic water sample analysis shall be obtained[ prior to] the use of water from the well in a public water system. (12) Well Equipping. (a) Naturally Flowing Wells. Naturally flowing wells shall: (i) have the discharge controlled by valves; (ii) be provided with permanent casing and sealed by grout; and[,] (iii) if erosion of the confining bed adjacent to the well appears likely, special protective construction
may be required by the Director. (b) Well Pumps. (i) The design discharge rate of the well pump shall not exceed the rate used during the constant-rate
aquifer drawdown test. (ii) Wells equipped with line shaft pumps shall: (A) have the casing firmly connected to the pump structure or have the casing inserted into the recess
extending at least 0.5 inches into the pump base; (B) have the pump foundation and base designed to prevent fluids from coming into contact with joints between the pump base and the casing; (C) be designed such that the intake of the well pump is at least ten feet below the maximum anticipated drawdown elevation; and[,] (D) avoid the use of oil lubrication for pumps with intake screens set at depths less than 400 feet[ (see]. See Subsection R309-105-10(7) and[/or] R309-515-8(2) for additional requirements of lubricants). (iii) Where a submersible pump is used: (A) the top of the casing shall be effectively sealed against the entrance of water under [all conditions]any condition of vibration or movement of conductors or cables; (B) the electrical cable shall be firmly attached to the riser pipe at 20-foot intervals or less; and[,] (C) the intake of the well pump must be at least ten feet below the maximum anticipated drawdown elevation. (c) Pitless Well Units and Adapters.
If the excavation surrounding the well casing allowing installation of the pitless unit compromises the surface seal, the competency of the surface seal shall be restored. [ ]Torch-cut holes in the well casing shall be [to] neat lines closely following the outline of the pitless adapter and [completely]entirely filled with a competent
weld with burrs and fins removed [prior to]before the installation of the pitless unit and adapter. Pitless well units and adapters shall: (i) be used to make a connection to a water well casing that is made below the ground. [ ]A below-the-
ground connection shall not be submerged in water during installation; (ii) terminate at least 18 inches above final ground elevation or three feet above the highest known flood elevation, whichever is greater; (iii) contain a label or have a certification indicating compliance with the Water Systems Council Pitless Adapter Standard (PAS-97); (iv) have suitable access to the interior of the casing [in order ]to disinfect the well; (v) have a suitable sanitary seal or cover at the upper terminal of the casing that will prevent the entrance of any fluids or contamination, especially at the connection point of the electrical cables; (vi) have suitable access so that measurements of static and pumped water levels in the well can be obtained; (vii) allow at least one check valve within the well casing;
(viii) be furnished with a cover that is lockable or otherwise protected against vandalism or sabotage;
(ix) be shop-fabricated from the point of connection with the well casing to the unit cap or cover; (x) be of watertight construction throughout;
(xi) be constructed of materials at least equivalent to and having wall thickness compatible to the casing; (xii) have field connection to the lateral discharge from the pitless unit of threaded, flanged, or mechanical joint connection; (xiii) be threaded or welded to the well casing. [ ]If the connection to the casing is by field weld, the shop-assembled unit must be designed specifically for field welding to the casing. [ ]The only field welding permitted on the pitless unit is to connect the pitless unit to the casing; and[,] (xiv) have an inside diameter as great as that of the well casing, up to and including casing diameters of 12 inches, to facilitate work and repair on the well, pump, or well screen. (d) Well Discharge Piping. The discharge piping shall: (i) be designed so that the friction loss will be low;
(ii) have control valves and appurtenances located above the pump house floor when an [above-ground]aboveground discharge is provided; (iii) be protected against the entrance of contamination;
(iv) be equipped with a smooth-nosed sampling tap, a check valve, a pressure gauge, a means of measuring flow, and a [shutoff]shut-off valve. [(w]With the smooth-nosed sampling tap being the first item from the well head and the shut-off valve as the last item[),], unless it is a naturally flowing well which may need an
alternative design; (v) where a well pumps directly into a distribution system, be equipped with an air release vacuum relief valve located upstream from the check valve, with exhaust[/] or relief piping terminating in a down-turned position at least six inches above the well house floor and covered with a No. 14 mesh corrosion resistant screen. [ ]An air release vacuum relief valve is not required if the specific proposed well head valve and piping design includes provisions for pumping to waste [all]the entirety of trapped air before water is introduced into the distribution system; (vi) have [all]every exposed piping valve[s] and appurtenance[s] protected against physical damage and freezing; (vii) be properly anchored to prevent movement; (viii) be properly protected against surge or water hammer; and[,] (ix) if a pump[ ]-to[ ]-waste line exists, it shall not be connected to a sewer[/] or storm drain without a minimum 12-inch clearance to the flood rim, and the discharge end of the pump-to-waste line shall be [downturned]down-turned and covered with a No. 4 mesh corrosion resistant screen[ (], refer to Subsection R309-
545-10(1[)).]). (e) Water Level Measurement. (i) Provisions shall be made to permit periodic measurement of water levels in the completed well.
(ii) Where permanent water level measuring equipment is installed, it shall be made using corrosion resistant materials attached firmly to the drop pipe or pump column and installed to prevent entrance of foreign materials.
(f) Observation Wells. Observation wells shall be: (i) constructed in accordance with the requirements for permanent wells if they are to remain in service after completion of a water supply well; and[,] (ii) protected at the upper terminal to preclude entrance of foreign materials. (g) Electrical Protection. Sufficient electrical controls shall be placed on [all]every pump motor[s] to eliminate electrical problems due to phase shifts, surges, or lightning[, etc]. (13) Well House Construction. The use of a well house is strongly recommended, particularly in installations utilizing above ground motors.
[In addition to applicable provisions of R309-540, well]Well pump houses shall conform to the following:
(a) Casing Projection Above Floor. The permanent casing for [all]any [ground water]groundwater well[s] shall project at least 12 inches
above the pump house floor or concrete apron surface and at least 18 inches above the final ground surface. However, casings terminated in underground vaults may be permitted if the vault is provided with a ["]drain-to-daylight["] sized to handle [in excess of]more than the well flow and surface runoff and is directed away from the vault access. (b) Floor Drain. Where a well house is constructed, the floor surface shall be at least six inches above the final ground elevation and shall be sloped to provide drainage. [ ]A ["]drain-to-daylight["] shall be provided unless highly impractical. (c) Earth Berm. Sites subject to flooding shall be provided with an earth berm terminating at an elevation at least two feet above the highest known flood elevation or other suitable protection as determined by the Director.
(d) Well Casing Termination at Flood Sites. The top of the well casing at sites subject to flooding shall terminate at least three feet above the 100-year flood level or the highest known flood elevation, whichever is higher[ (], refer to Subsection R309-515-
6(6)(b)(vi[)).]). (e) Miscellaneous. The well house shall be ventilated, heated, and lighted in such a manner as to assure adequate
oper[o]at[ect]ion of the equipment[ (refer to R309-540-5(2) (a) through (h)).]. (f) Fencing. Where necessary to protect the quality of the well water, the Director may require that certain wells be fenced in a manner similar to fencing required around spring areas. (g) Access. An access shall be provided either through the well house roof or sidewalls in the event the pump must be pulled for replacement or servicing the well. R309-515-7. [Ground Water]Groundwater - Springs. (1) General. Springs vary greatly in their characteristics and they should be observed for some time [prior to]before development to determine any flow and quality variations.[ ] Springs determined to be under the direct influence of surface water shall comply with surface water treatment requirements. (2) Source Protection.
Public drinking water systems are responsible for protecting their spring sources from contamination. [ ]The selection of a spring shall only be made after consideration of the requirements of Section R309-515-4.[ ] Springs must be located in an area that shall minimize threats from existing or potential sources of pollution. [ ]A
Preliminary Evaluation Report on source protection issues is required by Subsection R309-600-13(2).[ ] If certain precautions are taken, sewer lines may be permitted within a public drinking water system's source protection zones at the discretion of the Director. [ ]When sewer lines are permitted in protection zones both sewer lines and
[manholes]maintenance holes shall be specially constructed as described in Subsection R309-515-6(4). (3) Surface Water Influence. Some springs yield water that has been filtered underground for years; other springs yield water that has been filtered underground only a matter of hours. [ ]Even with proper development, the untreated water from certain springs may exhibit turbidity and high coliform counts. [ ]This indicates that the spring water is not being sufficiently filtered in underground travel.[ ] If a spring is determined to be under the direct influence of surface water, it shall be treated to meet the surface water treatment requirements specified in Section R309-505-6. (4) Pre-construction Submittal Before beginning spring development construction, the following information shall be submitted to the Director and approved in writing: (a) detailed plans and specifications covering the development work;
(b) if available, a copy of an engineer's or geologist's statement indicating:
(i) the historical record of spring flow variation; (ii) expected minimum flow and the time of year it will occur;
(iii) expected maximum flow and the time of year it will occur; (iv) expected average flow; and[,] (v) the behavior of the spring during drought conditions; (c) acceptable evidence that the water system has a legal right to divert water for the proposed use[(s)] from the spring source[(s);]; (d) a Preliminary Evaluation Report on source protection issues as required by Section R309-600-13; (e) a copy of the chemical analyses required by Subsection R309-515-4(5[) ;]); and[,] (f) an assessment of whether the spring is under the direct influence of surface water[(], refer to Subsection R309-505-7(1)(a[)).]). (5) Information Required after Spring Development. After development of a spring as a drinking water source, the following information shall be submitted to
the Director for review. (a) proof of satisfactory bacteriologic quality; (b) information on the rate of flow developed from the spring.
Immediately after spring development, the water system shall collect monthly spring flow data during operating seasons when the spring is reasonably accessible, as a minimum, for three years, and submit spring flow data to the Director for determination of spring yield. [ ]After evaluating the spring flow information including
seasonal and annual variations, the Director will determine a spring yield, which will be used in assessing the number of and type of connections that can be served by the spring. [ ]The spring yield typically is set at the 25th percentile of the spring flow data.[ ] If the spring exhibits significant seasonal or annual variations, the spring yield may be assessed on a case-by-case basis. (c) Record drawings of spring development. (6) Operating Permit Required. Water from the spring can be introduced into a public water system only after it has been approved for use, in writing, as evidenced by the issuance of an Operating Permit by the Director[ (], see Section R309-500-9[).]. (7) Spring Development. The development of springs for drinking water purposes shall comply with the following requirements. (a) The spring collection device, whether it be collection tile, perforated pipe, imported gravel, infiltration boxes, or tunnels must be covered with a minimum of 10 feet of relatively impervious soil cover. [ ]Such cover must extend a minimum of 15 feet in all horizontal directions from the spring collection device. [
]Clean, inert, non-organic material shall be placed in the vicinity of the collection device[(s).]. (b) Where it is impossible to achieve the 10 feet of relatively impervious soil cover, an acceptable alternate will be the use of an impermeable liner provided that:
(i) the liner has a minimum thickness of at least 40 mils; (ii) [all seams]each seam in the liner [are]is folded or welded to prevent leakage; (iii) the liner is certified as complying with ANSI/NSF Standard 61. [ ]This requirement is waived if
certain that the drinking water will not contact the liner; (iv) the liner is installed in such a manner as to assure its integrity. [ ]No stones, two inches or larger, or sharp edged, shall be located within two inches of the liner; (v) a minimum of two feet of relatively impervious soil cover is placed over the impermeable liner; and[,] (vi) the soil and liner cover are extended a minimum of 15 feet in [all]every horizontal direction[s] from the collection devices. (c) Each spring collection area shall be provided with at least one collection box to permit spring inspection and testing. (d) [All]Each junction box[es] and collection box[es,] must comply with Rule R309-545 with respect to access openings, venting, and tank overflow.[ ] Lids for these spring boxes shall be gasketed and the box
adequately vented.
(e) The spring collection area shall be surrounded by a fence located a distance of 50 feet[ (], preferably 100 feet if conditions allow[)], from [all]each collection device[s] on land at an elevation equal to or higher than
the collection device, and a distance of 15 feet from [all]each collection device[s] on land at an elevation lower than the collection device. [ ]The elevation datum to be used is the surface elevation at the point of collection. [ ]The fence shall be at least ["]stock tight[" (], see Rule R309-110[). ]. In remote areas where no grazing or public access is possible, an exception to the fencing requirement may be granted by the Director. [ ]In populated areas, a six-foot high chain link fence with three strands of barbed wire may be required. (f) Within the fenced area any[ll] vegetation having deep roots shall be removed by a means not negatively affecting water quality. (g) A diversion channel, or berm, capable of diverting [all]the entirety of anticipated surface water runoff away from the spring collection area shall be constructed immediately inside the fenced area. (h) A permanent flow-measuring device shall be installed. [ ]Flow measurement devices such as critical depth meters or weirs shall be properly housed and otherwise protected.
(i) The spring shall be developed as thoroughly as possible to minimize the possibility of excess spring water ponding within the collection area. [ ]Where the ponding of spring water is unavoidable, the excess shall be collected by shallow piping or french drain, and be routed beyond and down grade of the fenced area[ required
above], whether or not a fence is in place. R309-515-8. Operation and Maintenance.
(1) Spring Collection Area Maintenance. (a) Spring collection areas shall be periodically[ (], preferably annually[)], cleared of deep-rooted vegetation to prevent root growth from clogging collection lines.[ ] Frequent hand or mechanical clearing of spring collection areas and diversion channel is strongly recommended. [ ]It is advantageous to encourage the growth of grasses and other shallow rooted vegetation for erosion control and to inhibit the growth of more detrimental flora. (b) No pesticide [(e.g.,]or herbicide[)] may be applied on a spring collection area without the prior written approval of the Director.[ ] Such approval can be granted only when: (i) acceptable pesticides are proposed (ii) the pesticide product manufacturer certifies that no harmful substance will be imparted to the water and[,] (iii) spring development construction meets the requirements of [these r]Rules R309-500 through R309-550. (2) Pump Lubricants.
The [U.S.]US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved propylene glycol and certain types of mineral oil for occasional contact with or for addition to food products. [ ]These oils are commonly referred to as ["]food-grade mineral oils[". All oil]. Oil lubricated pumps shall utilize food[ ]-grade mineral oil suitable for
human consumption as determined by the Director. (3) Algicide Treatment. No algicide shall be applied to a drinking water source unless specific approval is obtained from the
Director. Such approval will be given only if the algicide is certified as meeting the requirements of ANSI/NSF Standard 60, Water Treatment Chemicals - Health Effects. KEY: drinking water, source development, source maintenance
Date of Last Change: 2024[January 21, 2014] Notice of Continuation: March 12, 2020 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-4-104
Agenda Item
7(B)
DRINKING WATER BOARD PACKET
Request to Adopt Rule R309-600. Source Protection: Drinking Water Source Protection For Groundwater Sources.
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
June 25, 2024

PROPOSAL: The Division of Drinking Water made change to R309-600-13(3) to delete special construction
criteria for sewer mains, laterals, and maintenance holes when locating new groundwater sources in
Source Protection Zone 2.

In addition, the Division made nonsubstantive changes throughout the R309-600 to comply with
Rulewriting Manual for Utah.

The public comment period ended on May 1, 2024, and the Division did not receive any comments on the proposed rule revision.

HISTORY/CONTEXT:
The proposed amendment to R309-600-13(3) deletes special construction criteria for sewer mains,
laterals, and manholes when locating new groundwater sources in Source Protection Zone 2
because the criteria can rarely be met, and the division frequently must issue exceptions to the rule requirements. The Division believes the special construction criteria are unnecessary to provide
protection of groundwater sources in Zone 2.
The proposed amendment also deletes the requirement that the Preliminary Evaluation Report
(PER) for the new source demonstrate that the special construction requirements have been met for sewer mains, laterals, and maintenance holes located in Source Protection Zone 2.
Sewer maintenance holes have been added to the list of facilities that must meet special
construction requirements and a minimum isolation distance from a wellhead or collection area
margin when locating a new groundwater source in Zone 1 for protected aquifers.
The proposed rule has been distributed within the Division and to public water systems,
consultants, and others for review. The Division has considered all comments received and
revised the rule as necessary. The proposed rule has also been pre-filed with the Office of
Administrative Rules for review as required by Executive Order 2021-12, Establishing Effective
Oversight Over State Agency Rulemaking, issued by Governor Cox on May 6, 2021.

DIVISION STAFF/DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION:
The Division recommends that the Drinking Water Board adopt the amendment to R309-600-13(3) and instruct Division staff to file the appropriate action with the Office of Administrative
Rules (OAR).
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
Request Drinking Water Board Approval to File Proposed Rule: Deadline to File Proposed Rule with OAR: Publication of Proposed Rule in Utah State Bulletin:
End of 30-Day Comment Period (no comments received):
Request Board Approval to Adopt Rule:
File Notice of Effective Date with OAR:
Anticipated Effective Date of Proposed Rule:

02/29/2024
03/15/2024 04/01/2024
05/01/2024
06/25/2024
06/26/2024
06/26/2024
COST ESTIMATE:
The Division anticipates that the proposed rule amendment will have no aggregate cost or savings
to the state budget, local governments, small businesses, non-small businesses, or other persons.

The proposed rule amendment is expected to have no compliance costs for affected persons, which are public water suppliers that plan to construct a groundwater source in which sewer mains,
laterals, or maintenance holes are present in Source Protection Zone 2, because the amendment
does not impose new requirements.
R309. Environmental Quality, Drinking Water. R309-600. Source Protection: Drinking Water Source Protection [F]for [Ground-Water]Groundwater Sources. R309-600-1. Authority. Under the authority of Subsection 19-4-104(1)(a)(iv), the Drinking Water Board adopts this rule which governs the protection of [ground-water]groundwater sources of drinking water. R309-600-2. Purpose. Public Water Systems (PWSs) are responsible for protecting their sources of drinking water from contamination. [ R309-600]This rule sets forth minimum requirements to establish a uniform, statewide program for implementation by PWSs to protect their [ground-water]groundwater sources of drinking water.[ ] PWSs are encouraged to enact more stringent programs to protect their sources of drinking water if they decide they are necessary.
[R309-600]This rule applies to [ground-water]groundwater sources and to [ground-water]groundwater sources which are under the direct influence of surface water which are used by PWSs to supply their systems with drinking water. [ ]However, compliance with this rule is voluntary for existing [ground-water]groundwater
sources of drinking water which are used by [public (]transient[)] non-community water systems. R309-600-3. Implementation.
(1) New [Ground-Water]Groundwater Sources - Each PWS shall submit a Preliminary Evaluation Report (PER) in accordance with Subsection R309-600-13(2) for each of its new [ground-water]groundwater sources to the Division of Drinking Water (DDW).[ ] A PWS shall not begin construction of a new source until the Director concurs with its PER. (2) Existing [Ground-Water]Groundwater Sources - Each PWS shall submit a Drinking Water Source Protection (DWSP) Plan in accordance with Subsection R309-600-7(1) for each of its existing [ground-water]groundwater sources to DDW according to the following schedule. [ ]Well fields or groups of springs may be considered[ to be] a single source. [TABLE 1
Population Served Percent Of DWSP Plans
By PWS: Sources: Due By:
Over 10,000 50% of wells December 31, 1995
Over 10,000 100% of wells December 31, 1996 3,300-10,000 100% of wells December 31, 1997
Less than 3,300 100% of wells December 31, 1998 Springs and
other sources 100% December 31, 1999 ]
TABLE 1
Population Served By PWS:
Percent of Sources: DWSP Plans Due By:
Over 10,000 50% of wells December 31, 1995
Over 10,000 100% of wells December 31, 1996
3,300-10,000 100% of wells December 31, 1997
Less than 3,300 100% of wells December 31, 1998 Springs and other sources 100% December 31, 1999
(3) DWSP for existing [ground-water]groundwater sources under the direct influence of surface water
shall be accomplished through delineation of both the [ground water]groundwater and surface water contribution areas. [ ]The requirements of Subsection R309-600-7(1) apply to the [ground water]groundwater portion and the requirements of Rule R309-605 apply to the surface water portion, except that the schedule for submitting these
DWSP [p]Plans to DDW is based on the schedule in Subsection R309-605-3(1).
(4) PWSs shall maintain [all ]land use agreements which were established under previous rules to protect their [ground-water]groundwater sources of drinking water from contamination.
R309-600-4. Exceptions. (1) Exceptions to the requirements of Rule R309-600 or parts thereof may be granted by the Director to PWSs if: [ ]due to compelling factors[ (], which may include economic factors[),], a PWS [is unable to]cannot comply with these requirements, and the granting of an exception will not result in an unreasonable risk to health. (2) The Director may prescribe a schedule by which the PWS must come into compliance with the requirements of Rule R309-600. R309-600-5. Designated Person. (1) A designated person shall be appointed and reported in writing to the Director by each PWS within 180 days of the effective date of Rule R309-600. [ ]The designated person's address, email address, and telephone
number shall be included in the written correspondence. [ ]Additionally, the [above]designated person's contact information must be included in each DWSP Plan and PER [that is ]submitted to DDW. (2) Each PWS shall notify the Director in writing within 30 days of any changes in the appointment of a
designated person. R309-600-6. Definitions.
[(1) ]The following terms are defined for the purposes of this rule: ([a]1) "Collection area" means the area surrounding a [ground-water]groundwater source which is underlain by collection pipes, tile, tunnels, infiltration boxes, or other [ground-water]groundwater collection devices. ([b]2) "Controls" means (a) the codes, ordinances, rules, and regulations currently in effect to regulate a potential contamination source.[ "Controls" also means physical controls which may prevent contaminants from migrating off of a site and into surface or ground water. "Controls" also means negligible quantities of contaminants.] [ (c] (b) physical controls which may prevent contaminants from migrating off a site and into surface water or groundwater. (c) negligible quantities of contaminants. (3) "Criteria" means the conceptual standards that form the basis for DWSP area delineation to include distance, [ground-water]groundwater time of travel, aquifer boundaries, and [ground-water]groundwater divides. ([d]4) "Criteria threshold" means a value or set of values selected to represent the limits above or below
which a given criterion will [cease to provide]stop providing the desired degree of protection. [ (e) "DDW" means Division of Drinking Water. (f] (5) "DWSP Program" means the program to protect drinking water source protection zones and
management areas from contaminants that may have an adverse effect on the health of persons. ([g]6) "DWSP Zone" means the surface and subsurface area surrounding a [ground-water]groundwater source of drinking water supplying a PWS, through which contaminants are reasonably likely to move toward and
reach such [ground-water]groundwater source. ([h]7) "Designated person" means the person appointed by a PWS to ensure that the requirements of Rule R309-600 are met. ([i]8) "Director" means the Director of the Division of Drinking Water. ([j)]9) "Engineer" means [a person licensed under the]the same as "Professional Engineer" as defined in Title 58, Chapter 22, Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors Licensing Act[, 58-22 of the Utah Code, as a "professional engineer" as defined therein]. ([k]10) "Existing [ground-water]groundwater source of drinking water" means a public supply [ground-water]groundwater source for which plans and specifications were submitted to DDW on or before July 26, 1993. ([l]11) "Geologist" means [a person licensed under the]the same as "Professional Geologist" as defined in Title 58, Chapter 76, Professional Geologist Licensing Act[, 58-76 of the Utah Code, as a "professional geologist"
as defined therein].
[ (m) "Ground-water] (12) " Groundwater Source" means any well, spring, tunnel, adit, or other underground opening from or through which [ground-water]groundwater flows or is pumped from subsurface
water-bearing formations. ([n]13) "Hydrogeologic methods" means the techniques used to translate selected criteria and criteria thresholds into mappable delineation boundaries. [ ]These methods include[, but are not limited to,] arbitrary fixed radii, analytical calculations and models, hydrogeologic mapping, and numerical flow models. ([o]14) "Land management strategies" means zoning and non-zoning strategies which include[, but are not limited to,] the following:[ ] zoning and subdivision ordinances, site plan reviews, design and operating standards, source prohibitions, purchase of property and development rights, public education programs, [ground-water]groundwater monitoring, household hazardous waste collection programs, water conservation programs, memoranda of understanding, written contracts and agreements, and so forth. ([p]15) "Land use agreement" means a written agreement wherein the owner[(s)] agrees not to locate or allow the location of uncontrolled potential contamination sources or pollution sources within zone one of new
wells in protected aquifers. [ ]The owner[(s)] must also agree not to locate or allow the location of pollution sources within zone two of new wells in unprotected aquifers and new springs unless the pollution source agrees to install design standards which prevent contaminated discharges to [ground water. ]groundwater. This restriction
must be binding on [all]any heirs, successors, and assigns.[ ] Land use agreements must be recorded with the property description in the local county recorder's office. [ ]Refer to Subsection R309-600-13(2)(d). Land use agreements for protection areas on publicly owned lands need not be recorded in the local
county recorder office. [ ]However, a letter must be obtained from the Administrator of the land in question and meet the requirements[ described above]. ([q]16) "Management area" means the area outside of zone one and within a two-mile radius where the Optional Two-[m]Mile Radius Delineation Procedure has been used to identify a protection area. For wells, land may be excluded from the DWSP management area at locations where it is more than 100 feet lower in elevation than the total drilled depth of the well. For springs and tunnels, the DWSP management area is [all]any land at an elevation equal to or higher than, and within a two-mile radius, of the spring or tunnel collection area. [ ]The DWSP management area also includes [all]any land lower in elevation than, and within 100 horizontal feet, of the spring or tunnel collection area. [ ]The elevation datum to be used is the point of water collection.[ ] Land may also be excluded from the DWSP management area at locations where it is separated from the [ground-water]groundwater source by a surface drainage which is lower in elevation than the spring or tunnel collection area. ([r]17) "New [ground-water]groundwater source of drinking water" means a public supply [ground-water]groundwater source of drinking water for which plans and specifications are submitted to DDW after July
26, 1993. ([s]18) "Nonpoint source" means any diffuse source of pollutants or contaminants not otherwise defined as a point source.
([t]19) "PWS" means public water system. ([u]20) "Point source" means any discernible, confined, and discrete source of pollutants or contaminants, including [but not limited to ]any site, pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure,
container, rolling stock, animal feeding operation with more than ten animal units, landfill, or vessel or other floating craft, from which pollutants are or may be discharged. ([v]21) "Pollution source" means point source discharges of contaminants to [ground water]groundwater or potential discharges of the liquid forms of "extremely hazardous substances" which are stored in containers in excess of "applicable threshold planning quantities" as specified in SARA Title III. [ ]Examples of possible pollution sources include[,] [but are not limited to,] the following:[ ] storage facilities that store the liquid forms of extremely hazardous substances, septic tanks, drain fields, class V underground injection wells, landfills, open dumps, landfilling of sludge and septage, manure piles, salt piles, pit privies, drain lines, and animal feeding operations with more than ten animal units. The following definitions are part of Rule R309-600 and clarify the meaning of "pollution source:" ([i]a) "Animal feeding operation" means a lot or facility where the following conditions are met: animals
have been or will be stabled or confined and fed or maintained for a total of 45 days or more in any 12 month
period, and crops, vegetation forage growth, or post-harvest residues are not sustained in the normal growing season over any portion of the lot or facility. [ ]Two or more animal feeding operations under common ownership
are considered to be a single feeding operation if they adjoin each other, if they use a common area, or if they use a common system for the disposal of wastes. ([ii]b) "Animal unit" means a unit of measurement for any animal feeding operation calculated by adding the following numbers; the number of slaughter and feeder cattle multiplied by 1.0, plus the number of mature dairy cattle multiplied by 1.4, plus the number of swine weighing over 55 pounds multiplied by 0.4, plus the number of sheep multiplied by 0.1, plus the number of horses multiplied by 2.0. ([iii]c) "Extremely hazardous substances" means those substances which are identified in the Sec. 302(EHS) column of the "Title III List of Lists: Consolidated List of Chemicals Subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and Section 112(R) of the Clean Air Act, As Amended," (550B98017). [ ]A copy of this document may be obtained from: [ ]NCEPI, PO Box 42419, Cincinnati, OH 45202. [ ]Online ordering is also available at
[http://www.epa.gov/ncepihom/orderpub.html.]https://nepis.epa.gov/. ([w]22) "Potential contamination source" means any facility or site which employs an activity or procedure which may potentially contaminate [ground water. ]groundwater. A pollution source is also a potential
contamination source. ([x]23) "Protected aquifer" means a producing aquifer in which the following conditions are met: ([i]a) [A]a naturally protective layer of clay, at least 30 feet in thickness, is present above the aquifer;
([ii]b) the PWS provides data to [indicate]show the lateral continuity of the clay layer to the extent of zone two; and ([iii]c) the public[-] supply well is grouted with a grout seal that extends from the ground surface down to at least 100 feet below the surface, and for a thickness of at least 30 feet through the protective clay layer. ([y]24) "Replacement well" means a public[-] supply well drilled for the sole purpose of replacing an existing public[-] supply well which is impaired or made useless by structural difficulties and in which the following conditions are met: ([i]a) the proposed well location shall be within a radius of 150 feet from an existing [ground-water]groundwater supply well, as defined in Subsection R309-600-6([1)(k]10); and ([ii]b) the PWS provides a copy of the replacement application approved by the State Engineer[ (], refer to Section 73-3-28[ of the Utah Code Annotated).]. ([z]25) "Time of travel" means the time required for a particle of water to move in the producing aquifer from a specific point to a [ground-water]groundwater source of drinking water. ([aa]26) "Unprotected aquifer" means any aquifer that does not meet the definition of a protected aquifer.
([bb]27) "Wellhead" means the physical structure, facility, or device at the land surface from or through which [ground-water]groundwater flows or is pumped from subsurface, water-bearing formations. R309-600-7. DWSP Plans. (1) Each PWS shall develop, submit, and implement a DWSP Plan for each of its [ground-water]groundwater sources of drinking water.
Required Sections for DWSP Plans - DWSP Plans should be developed in accordance with the "Standard Report Format for Existing Wells and Springs." [ ]This document may be obtained from DDW.[ ] DWSP Plans must include the following seven sections: (a) DWSP Delineation Report - A DWSP Delineation Report in accordance with Subsection R309-600-9(6[) is the first section of a DWSP Plan.]). (b) Potential Contamination Source Inventory and Assessment of Controls [-]-- A Prioritized Inventory of Potential Contamination Sources and an assessment of their controls in accordance with Section R309-600-10[ is the second section of a DWSP Plan]. (c) Management Program to Control Each Preexisting Potential Contamination Source - A Management Program to Control Each Preexisting Potential Contamination Source in accordance with Section R309-600-11[ is the third section of a DWSP Plan].
(d) Management Program to Control or Prohibit Future Potential Contamination Sources - A Plan for
Controlling or Prohibiting Future Potential Contamination Sources[ is the fourth section of a DWSP Plan. ]. This must be in accordance with Section R309-600-12, consistent with[ the general provisions of] this rule, and
implemented to an extent allowed under the PWS's authority and jurisdiction. (e) Implementation Schedule - Each PWS shall develop a step-by-step implementation schedule which lists each of its proposed land management strategies with an implementation date for each strategy. (f) Resource Evaluation - Each PWS shall assess the financial and other resources which may be required for it to implement each of its DWSP Plans and determine how these resources may be acquired. (g) Recordkeeping - Each PWS shall document changes in each of its DWSP Plans as they are continuously updated to show current conditions in the protection zones and management areas. [ ]As a DWSP Plan is executed, the PWS shall document any land management strategies that are implemented. [ ]These documents may include any of the following: ordinances, codes, permits, memoranda of understanding, public education programs, public notifications, and so forth. (2) DWSP Plan Administration - DWSP Plans shall be submitted, corrected, retained, implemented,
updated, and revised according to the following: (a) Submitting DWSP Plans - Each PWS shall submit a DWSP Plan to DDW in accordance with the schedule in Section R309-600-3 for each of its [ground-water]groundwater sources of drinking water.
(b) Correcting Deficiencies - Each PWS shall correct any deficiencies in a disapproved DWSP Plan and resubmit it to DDW within 90 days of the disapproval date. (c) Retaining DWSP Plans - Each PWS shall [retain]keep on its premises a current copy of each of its
DWSP Plans. (d) Implementing DWSP Plans - Each PWS shall begin implementing each of its DWSP Plans in accordance with its schedule in Subsection R309-600-7(1)(e), within 180 days after submittal if they are not disapproved by the Director. (e) Updating and Resubmitting DWSP Plans - Each PWS shall update its DWSP Plans as often as necessary to ensure they show current conditions in the DWSP zones and management areas. [ ]Updated plans also document the implementation of land management strategies in the recordkeeping section. [ ][Actual c]Copies of any ordinances, codes, permits, memoranda of understanding, public education programs, bill stuffers, newsletters, training session agendas, minutes of meetings, memoranda for file[, etc]. must be submitted with the recordkeeping section of updated plans. [ ]DWSP Plans are initially due according to the schedule in Section R309-600-3. [ ]Thereafter, updated DWSP Plans are due every six years from their original due date.[ ] This applies even though a PWS may have been granted an extension beyond the original due date. (f) Revising DWSP Plans - Each PWS shall submit a revised DWSP Plan to DDW within 180 days after the reconstruction or redevelopment of any [ground-water]groundwater source of drinking water which addresses
changes in source construction, source development, hydrogeology, delineation, potential contamination sources, and proposed land management strategies. R309-600-8. DWSP Plan Review. (1) The Director shall review each DWSP Plan submitted by PWSs and "concur," "concur with recommendations," "conditionally concur" or "disapprove" the plan. [ ]The Director may also authorize the
designated DDW Source Protection Manager to issue the following actions: "concur" and "concur with recommendations." (2) The Director may "disapprove" DWSP Plans for any of the following reasons: (a) [A]an inaccurate DWSP Delineation Report, a report that uses a non-applicable delineation method, or a DWSP Plan that is missing this report or any of the information and data required in it[ (], refer to Subsection R309-600-9([6]7)[)]; (b) an inaccurate Prioritized Inventory of Potential Contamination Sources or a DWSP Plan that is missing this report or any of the information required in it[ (], refer to Subsection R309-600-10(1[));]); (c) an inaccurate assessment of current controls[ (], refer to Subsection R309-600-10(2[));]); (d) a missing Management Program to Control Each Preexisting Potential Contamination Source which has been assessed as "not adequately controlled" by the PWS[ (], refer to Subsection R309-600-11(1[));]);
(e) a missing Management Program to Control or Prohibit Future Potential Contamination Sources[ (],
refer to Section R309-600-12[);]; (f) a missing or incomplete Implementation Schedule, Resource Evaluation, Recordkeeping Section,
Contingency Plan, or Public Notification Plan[ (], refer to Subsections R309-600-7(1)(e[)-(]) through (g), Section R309-600-14, and Section R309-600-15[).]. (3) The Director may "concur with recommendations" when PWSs propose management programs to control preexisting potential contamination sources or management programs to control or prohibit future potential contamination sources for existing or new drinking water sources which appear inadequate or ineffective. (4) The Director may "conditionally concur" with a DWSP Plan or PER. [ ]The PWS must implement the conditions and report compliance the next time the DWSP Plan is due and submitted to DDW. R309-600-9. Delineation of Protection Zones and Management Areas. (1) PWSs shall delineate protection zones or a management area around each of their [ground-
water]groundwater sources of drinking water using the Preferred Delineation Procedure or the Optional Two-[m]Mile Radius Delineation Procedure.[ ] The hydrogeologic method used by PWSs shall produce protection zones or a management area in accordance with the criteria thresholds [below. ]specified in Subsection R309-600-
9(2) through Subsection R309-600-9(7). PWSs may also choose to verify protected aquifer conditions to reduce the level of management controls applied in applicable protection areas. (2) Reports must be prepared by a qualified licensed professional - A submitted report which addresses
any of the following sections shall be stamped and signed by a professional geologist or professional engineer: (a) [A]a Delineation Report for Estimated DWSP Zones produced using the Preferred Delineation Procedure, as explained in Subsection R309-600-13(2)(a); (b) a DWSP Delineation Report produced using the Preferred Delineation Procedure, as explained in Subsections R309-600-9(3)(a) and (6)(a); (c) a report to verify protected aquifer conditions, as explained in Subsections R309-600-9(4) and (7); (d) a report which addresses special conditions, as explained in Subsection R309-600-9(5); or (e) a Hydrogeologic Report to Exclude a Potential Contamination Source, as explained in Subsection R309-600-9(6)(b)(ii). (3) Criteria Thresholds for [Ground-water]Groundwater Sources of Drinking Water: (a) Preferred Delineation Procedure - Four zones are delineated for management purposes: (i) Zone one is the area within a 100-foot radius from the wellhead or margin of the collection area. (ii) Zone two is the area within a 250-day [ground-water]groundwater time of travel to the wellhead or margin of the collection area, the boundary of the aquifer[(s)] which supplies water to the [ground-
water]groundwater source, or the [ground-water]groundwater divide, whichever is closer. [ ]If the available data [indicate]shows a zone of increased [ground-water]groundwater velocity within the producing aquifer[(s),], then time[-] of[-] travel calculations shall be based on this data.
(iii) Zone three[ (], waiver criteria zone[)], is the area within a 3-year [ground-water]groundwater time of travel to the wellhead or margin of the collection area, the boundary of the aquifer[(s)] which supplies water to the [ground-water]groundwater source, or the [ground-water]groundwater divide, whichever is closer. [ ]If the
available data [indicate]shows a zone of increased [ground-water]groundwater velocity within the producing aquifer[(s),], then time[-] of[-] travel calculations shall be based on this data. (iv) Zone four is the area within a 15-year [ground-water]groundwater time of travel to the wellhead or margin of the collection area, the boundary of the aquifer[(s)] which supplies water to the [ground-water]groundwater source, or the [ground-water]groundwater divide, whichever is closer. [ ]If the available data [indicate]shows a zone of increased [ground-water]groundwater velocity within the producing aquifer[(s),], then time[-] of[-] travel calculation shall be based on this data. (b) Optional Two-[m]Mile Radius Delineation Procedure - In place of the Preferred Delineation Procedure, PWSs may choose to use the Optional Two-[m]Mile Radius Delineation Procedure to delineate a management area.[ ] This procedure is best applied in remote areas where few if any potential contamination sources are located. [ ]Refer to Subsection R309-600-6([1)(q]16) for the definition of a management area.
(4) Protected Aquifer Classification - PWSs may choose to verify protected aquifer conditions to reduce
the level of management controls for a public[-] supply well which produces water from a protected aquifer[(s)] or to meet one of the requirements of a VOC or pesticide susceptibility waiver[ (], refer to Subsection R309-600-
16(4[)). ]). Refer to Subsection R309-600-6([1)(x]23) for the definition of a "protected aquifer." (5) Special Conditions - Special scientific or engineering studies may be conducted to support a request for an exception[ (], refer to Section R309-600-4[)], due to special conditions. [ ]These studies must be approved by the Director before the PWS begins the study. [ ]Special studies may include confined aquifer conditions, [ground-water]groundwater movement through protective layers, wastewater transport and fate[, etc]. (6) DWSP Delineation Report - Each PWS shall submit a DWSP Delineation Report to DDW for each of its [ground-water]groundwater sources using the Preferred Delineation Procedure or the Optional Two-[m]Mile Radius Delineation Procedure. (a) Preferred Delineation Procedure - Delineation reports for protection zones delineated using the Preferred Delineation Procedure shall include the following information and a list of [all ]sources or references for this information:
(i) Geologic Data - A brief description of geologic features and aquifer characteristics observed in the well and area of the potential protection zones. [ ]This should include the formal or informal stratigraphic name[(s),] lithology of the aquifer[(s)] and confining unit[(s),], and description of fractures and solution cavities[
(], including the size, abundance, spacing, and orientation[)]; and faults[ (], including a brief description of location in or near the well, and orientation[). ]. Lithologic descriptions can be obtained from surface hand samples or well cuttings; core samples and laboratory analyses are not necessary. [ ]Fractures, solution cavities,
and faults may be described from surface outcrops or drill logs. (ii) Well Construction Data - If the source is a well, the report shall include the well driller's log, elevation of the wellhead, borehole radius, casing radius, total depth of the well, depth and length of the screened or perforated interval[(s),], well screen or perforation type, casing type, method of well construction, type of pump, location of pump in the well, and the maximum projected pumping rate of the well. [ ]The maximum pumping rate of the well must be used in the delineation calculations.[ ] Averaged pumping rate values shall not be used. (iii) Spring Construction Data - If the source is a spring or tunnel the report shall include a description or diagram of the collection area and method of [ground-water]groundwater collection. (iv) Aquifer Data for New Wells - A summary report including the calculated hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer, transmissivity, hydraulic gradient, direction of [ground-water]groundwater flow, estimated effective porosity, and saturated thickness of the producing aquifer[(s). ]. The PWS shall obtain the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer from a constant-rate aquifer test and provide the data as described in Subsection R309-515-6(10)(b). [ ]Estimated effective porosity must be between 1% and 30%.[ ] Clay layers shall not be included in calculations
of aquifer thickness or estimated effective porosity. [ ]This report shall include graphs, data, or printouts showing the interpretation of the aquifer test. (v) Aquifer Data for Existing Wells - A summary report including the calculated hydraulic conductivity
of the aquifer, transmissivity, hydraulic gradient, direction of [ground-water]groundwater flow, estimated effective porosity, and saturated thickness of the producing aquifer[(s). ]. The PWS shall obtain the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer from a constant-rate aquifer test using the existing pumping equipment. [ ]Aquifer tests
using observation wells are encouraged[,] but are not required. [ ]If a previously performed aquifer test is available and includes the required data described [below,]in Subsection R309-600-9(6)(v)(A) and Subsection R309-600-9(6)(v)(B), data from that test may be used instead. [ ]Estimated effective porosity must be between 1% and 30%.[ ] Clay layers shall not be included in calculations of aquifer thickness or estimated effective porosity. [ ]This report shall include graphs, data, or printouts showing the interpretation of the aquifer test. If a constant-rate aquifer test is not practical, then the PWS shall obtain hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer using another appropriate method, such as data from a nearby well in the same aquifer, specific capacity of the well, published hydrogeologic studies of the same aquifer, or local or regional [ground-water]groundwater models.[ ] A constant-rate test may not be practical for such reasons as insufficient drawdown in the well, inaccessibility of the well for water-level measurements, or insufficient overflow capacity for the pumped water. The constant-rate test shall:
(A) Provide for continuous pumping for at least 24 hours or until stabilized drawdown has continued for
at least six hours. [ ]Stabilized drawdown is achieved when there is less than one foot of change of [ground-water]groundwater level in the well within a six-hour period.
(B) Provide data as described in Subsections R309-515-6(10)(b)(v) through (vii). (vi) Additional Data for Observation Wells - If the aquifer test is conducted using observation wells, the report shall include the following information for each observation well: location and surface elevation; total depth; depth and length of the screened or perforated intervals; radius, casing type, screen or perforation type, and method of construction; [prepumping ground-water]pre-pumping groundwater level; the time-drawdown or distance-drawdown data and curve; and the total drawdown. (vii) Hydrogeologic Methods and Calculations - These include the [ground-water]groundwater model or other hydrogeologic methods used to delineate the protection zones, [all]any applicable equations, values, and the calculations which determine the delineated boundaries of zones two, three, and four. [ ]The hydrogeologic method or [ground-water]groundwater model must be reasonably applicable for the aquifer setting. [ ]For wells, the hydrogeologic method or [ground-water]groundwater model must include the effects of drawdown[ (],
including increased hydraulic gradient near the well[)], and interference from other wells. (viii) Map Showing Boundaries of the DWSP Zones - A map showing the location of the [ground-water]groundwater source of drinking water and the boundary for each DWSP zone. [ ]The base map shall be a
1:24,000-scale[ (], 7.5-minute series[)], topographic map, such as is published by the [U.S.]US Geological Survey. [ ]Although zone one[ (], 100-foot radius around the well or margin of the collection area[)], need not be on the map, the complete boundaries for zones two, three, and four must be drawn and labeled. [ ]More detailed
maps are optional and may be submitted in addition to the [map ]required [above]map. The PWS shall also include a written description of the distances which define the delineated boundaries of zones two, three, and four. [ ]These written descriptions must include the maximum distances upgradient from the well, the maximum distances downgradient from the well, and the maximum widths of each protection zone. (b) Optional Two-Mile Radius Delineation Procedure - Delineation Reports for protection areas delineated using the Optional Two-[m]Mile Radius Delineation Procedure shall include the following information: (i) Map Showing Boundaries of the DWSP Management Area - A map showing the location of the [ground-water]groundwater source of drinking water and the DWSP management area boundary. [ ]The base map shall be a 1:24,000-scale[ (], 7.5-minute series[)], topographic map, such as is published by the [U.S.]US Geological Survey. [ ]Although zone one[ (], 100-foot radius around the well or margin of the collection area[)], need not be on the map, the complete two-mile radius must be drawn and labeled. [ ]More detailed maps are optional and may be submitted in addition to the [map ]required [above]map. (ii) Hydrogeologic Report to Exclude a Potential Contamination Source - To exclude a potential
contamination source from the inventory which is required in Subsection R309-600-10(1), a hydrogeologic report is required which clearly demonstrates that the potential contamination source has no capacity to contaminate the source.
(7) Protected Aquifer Conditions - If a PWS chooses to verify protected aquifer conditions, it shall submit the following additional data to DDW for each of its [ground-water]groundwater sources for which the protected aquifer conditions apply.[ ] The report must state that the aquifer meets the definition of a protected
aquifer based on the following information: (a) thickness, depth, and lithology of the protective clay layer; (b) data to [indicate]show the lateral continuity of the protective clay layer over the extent of zone two.[ ] This may include such data as correlation of beds in multiple wells, published hydrogeologic studies, stratigraphic studies, potentiometric surface studies, and so forth; and (c) evidence that the well has been grouted or otherwise sealed from the ground surface to a depth of at least 100 feet and for a thickness of at least 30 feet through the protective clay layer in accordance with Subsections R309-600-6([1)(x]23) and R309-515-6(6[)(i]). R309-600-10. Potential Contamination Source Inventory and Identification and Assessment of Controls. (1) Prioritized Inventory of Potential Contamination Sources - Each PWS shall list [all]every potential
contamination source[s] within each DWSP zone or management area in priority order and state the basis for this
order. [ ]This priority ranking shall be according to relative risk to the drinking water source. [ ]The name and address of each commercial and industrial potential contamination source is required.[ ] Additional information
should include the name and phone number of a contact person and a list of the chemical, biological, and[/or] radiological hazards associated with each potential contamination source.[ ] Additionally, each PWS shall identify each potential contamination source as to its location in zones one, two, three, four or in a management area and plot it on the map required in Subsection R309-600-9(6)(a)(viii) or Subsection R309-600-9(6)(b)(i). (a) List of Potential Contamination Sources - A List of Potential Contamination Sources is found in the "Source Protection User's Guide for [Ground-Water]Groundwater Sources." [ ]This document may be obtained from DDW.[ ] This list may be used by PWSs as a guide to inventorying potential contamination sources within their DWSP zones and management areas. (b) Refining, Expanding, Updating, and Verifying Potential Contamination Sources - Each PWS shall update its list of potential contamination sources to show current conditions within DWSP zones or management areas. [ ]This includes adding potential contamination sources which have moved into DWSP zones or
management areas, deleting potential contamination sources which have moved out, improving available data about potential contamination sources, and [all]any other appropriate refinements. (2) Identification and Assessment of Current Controls - PWSs are not required to plan and implement
land management strategies for potential contamination source hazards that are assessed as "adequately controlled." [ ]If controls are not identified, the potential contamination source will be [considered to be ]"not adequately controlled."[ ] Additionally, if the hazards at a potential contamination source cannot be identified, the
potential contamination source must be assessed as "not adequately controlled." [ ]Identification and assessment should be limited to one of the following controls for each applicable hazard: regulatory, best management[/] and pollution prevention, physical, or negligible quantity.[ ] Each of the following topics for a control must be addressed before identification and assessment will be considered [to be ]complete. [ ]Refer to the "Source Protection User's Guide for [Ground-Water]Groundwater Sources" for a list of government agencies and the programs they administer to control potential contamination sources. [ ]This guide may be obtained from DDW. (a) Regulatory Controls - Identify the enforcement agency and verify that the hazard is being regulated by them; cite and[/or] quote applicable references in the regulation, rule or ordinance which pertain to controlling the hazard; explain how the regulatory control prevents [ground-water]groundwater contamination; assess the hazard; and set a date to reassess the hazard. (b) Best Management[/] and Pollution Prevention Practice Controls - List the specific best management[/] and pollution prevention practices which have been implemented by potential contamination source management to control the hazard and [indicate]show that they are willing to continue the use of these practices; explain how these practices prevent [ground-water]groundwater contamination; assess the hazard; and
set a date to reassess the hazard. (c) Physical Controls - Describe the physical [control(s)]controls which have been constructed to control the hazard; explain how these controls prevent contamination; assess the hazard; and set a date to reassess the
hazard. (d) Negligible Quantity Control - Identify the quantity of the hazard that is being used, disposed, stored, manufactured, [and/]or transported; explain why this amount should be considered a negligible quantity; assess
the hazard; and set a date to reassess the hazard. (3) For [the purpose of ]meeting the requirements of Rule R309-600, the Director will consider a PWS's assessment that a potential contamination source which is covered by a permit or approval under one of the regulatory programs listed below sufficient to demonstrate that the source is adequately controlled unless otherwise determined by the Director. [ ]For [all]any other state programs, the PWS's assessment is subject to review by the Director; as a result, a PWS's DWSP Plan may be disapproved if the Director does not concur with its assessment[(s).]. (a) The Utah [Ground-Water]Groundwater Quality Protection program established by Section 19-5-104 and Rule R317-6; (b) closure plans or Part B permits under authority of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1984 regarding the monitoring and treatment of [ground water]groundwater;
(c) the Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) established by Section 19-5-104 and Rule
R317-8; (d) the Underground Storage Tank Program established by Section 19-6-403 and Rules R311-200
through R311-208; and (e) the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program for classes I-IV established by Sections 19-5-104 and 40-6-5 and Rules R317-7 and R649-5. R309-600-11. Management Program to Control Each Preexisting Potential Contamination Source. (1) PWSs shall plan land management strategies to control each preexisting potential contamination source in accordance with their authority and jurisdiction. [ ]Land management strategies must be consistent with [the provisions of]Rule R309-600, designed to control potential contamination, and may be regulatory or non-regulatory. [ ]Each potential contamination source listed on the inventory required in Subsection R309-600-10(1) and assessed as "not adequately controlled" must be addressed. [ ]Land management strategies must be implemented according to the schedule required in Subsection R309-600-7(1)(e).
(2) PWSs with overlapping protection zones and management areas may cooperate in controlling a particular preexisting potential contamination source if one PWS will agree to take the lead in planning and implementing land management strategies and the remaining [PWS(s)]PWSs will assess the preexisting potential
contamination source as "adequately controlled." R309-600-12. Management Program to Control or Prohibit Future Potential Contamination Sources for Existing Drinking Water Sources. (1) PWSs shall plan land management strategies to control or prohibit future potential contamination sources within each of its DWSP zones or management areas consistent with [the provisions of]Rule R309-600 and to an extent allowed under its authority and jurisdiction. Land management strategies must be designed to control potential contamination and may be regulatory or non-regulatory. [ ]Additionally, land management strategies must be implemented according to the schedule required in Subsection R309-600-7(1)(e). (2) Protection areas may extend into neighboring cities, towns, and counties.[ ] Since it may not be possible for some PWSs to enact regulatory land management strategies outside of their jurisdiction, except as described [below,]in Subsection R309-600-12(3) and Subsection R309-600-12(4), it is recommended that these PWSs contact their neighboring cities, towns, and counties to see if they are willing to implement protective ordinances to prevent [ground-water]groundwater contamination under joint management agreements. (3) Cities and towns have extraterritorial jurisdiction in accordance with Section 10-8-15 [of the Utah Code Annotated ]to enact ordinances to protect a stream or ["]source["] from which their water is taken[... "] for 15 miles above the point from which it is taken and for a distance of 300 feet on each side of such stream[..."].
Section 10-8-15 includes [ground-water]groundwater sources. (4) Zoning ordinances are an effective means to control potential contamination sources that may want to move into protection areas. [ ]They allow PWSs to prohibit facilities that would discharge contaminants directly
to [ground water. ]groundwater. They also allow PWSs to review plans from potential contamination sources to ensure there will be adequate spill protection and waste disposal procedures[, etc]. If zoning ordinances are not used, PWSs must establish a plan to contact potential contamination sources individually as they move into
protection areas, identify and assess their controls, and plan land management strategies if they are not adequately controlled. R309-600-13. New [Ground-water]Groundwater Sources of Drinking Water. (1) [Prior to]Before constructing a new [ground-water]groundwater source of drinking water, each PWS shall develop a PER which demonstrates whether the source meets the requirements of this section and submit it to DDW. [ ]Additionally, engineering information in accordance with SubsectionR309-515-6(5)(a) or Subsection R309-515-7(4) must be submitted to DDW.[ ] The Director will not grant plan approval until both source protection and engineering requirements are met. [ ]Construction standards relating to protection zones and management areas[ (], including fencing, diversion channels, sewer line construction, and grouting, [etc.) ]are found in Rule R309-515.[ ] After the source is constructed a DWSP Plan must be developed, submitted, and
implemented accordingly.
(2) Preliminary Evaluation Report for New Sources of Drinking Water - PERs shall cover [all]each of the four zones or the entire management area.[ ] PERs should be developed in accordance with the "Standard Report
Format for New Wells and Springs." [ ]This document may be obtained from DDW.[ ] PWSs shall include the following four sections in each PER: (a) Delineation Report for Estimated DWSP Zones - The same requirements apply as in Subsection R309-600-9(6), except that the hydrogeologic data for the PER must be developed using the best available data which may be obtained from: [ ]surrounding wells, published information, or surface geologic mapping. [ ]PWSs must use the Preferred Delineation Procedure to delineate protection zones for new wells.[ ] The Delineation Report for Estimated DWSP Zones shall be stamped and signed by a professional geologist or professional engineer unless the Optional Two-Mile Radius Delineation Procedure is used for a new spring. (b) Inventory of Potential Contamination Sources and Identification and Assessment of Controls - The same requirements apply as in Subsections R309-600-10(1) and (2).[ ] Additionally, the PER must demonstrate that the source meets the following requirements:
(i) Protection Areas Delineated using the Preferred Delineation Procedure in Protected Aquifers - A PWS shall not locate a new [ground-water]groundwater source of drinking water where an uncontrolled potential contamination source or a pollution source exists within zone one.
(ii) Protection Areas Delineated using the Preferred Delineation Procedure in Unprotected Aquifers - A PWS shall not locate a new [ground-water]groundwater source of drinking water where an uncontrolled potential contamination source or an uncontrolled pollution source exists within zone one. [ ]Additionally, a new [ground-
water]groundwater source of drinking water may not be located where a pollution source exists within zone two unless the pollution source implements design standards which prevent contaminated discharges to [ground water]groundwater. (iii) Management Areas Delineated using the Optional Two-Mile Radius Delineation Procedure - A PWS shall not locate a new spring where an uncontrolled potential contamination source or a pollution source exists within zone one. [ ]Additionally, a new spring may not be located where a pollution source exists within the management area unless: a hydrogeologic report in accordance with Subsection R309-600-9(6)(b)(ii) which verifies that it does not impact the spring; or the pollution source implements design standards which prevent contaminated discharges to [ground water]groundwater. (c) Land Ownership Map - A land ownership map which includes [all]the entirety of land within zones one and two or the entire management area.[ ] Additionally, include a list which exclusively identifies the land owners in zones one and two or the management area, the [parcel(s)]parcels of land which they own, and the zone in which they own land.[ ] A land ownership map and list are not required if ordinances are used to protect these areas.
(d) Land Use Agreements, Letters of Intent, or Zoning Ordinances - Land use agreements which meet the requirements of the definition in Subsection R309-600-6([1)(p). ]15). Zoning ordinances which are already in effect or letters of intent may be substituted for land use agreements; however, they must accomplish the same
level of protection that is required in a land use agreement. Letters of intent must be notarized, include the same language that is required in land use agreements, and contain the statement that "the owner agrees to record the land use agreement in the county recorder's office, if the source proves to be an acceptable drinking water source."
[ ]The PWS shall not introduce a new source into its system until copies of [all]each applicable recorded land use agreements are submitted to DDW. (3) Sewers Within DWSP [Zones and Management Areas - Sewer lines may]Zone One - A new groundwater source shall not be located where a sanitary sewer line, sewer lateral, or sewer maintenance access exists within zone[s] one [and two or a management area ]unless the criteria identified [below]in Subsection R309-600-13(3)(a) or Subsection R309-600-13(3)(b) are met. [ ]If sewer lines, sewer laterals, or sewer maintenance access are located or planned to be located within zone[s] one[ and two or a management area], the PER must demonstrate that they comply with these criteria. Sewer lines that comply with these criteria may be assessed as adequately controlled potential contamination sources. (a) Unprotected Aquifers -[ (i) Zone] In zone one[- all], each sewer [lines and laterals]line, sewer lateral, and sewer maintenance
access shall be constructed in accordance with Subsection R309-515-6(4) and shall be at least 50 feet from the
wellhead or margin of the collection area[, and be constructed in accordance to R309-515-6]. [ (ii) Zone two- all sewer lines and laterals within zone two or a management area shall be constructed in
accordance with R309-515-6.] (b) Protected Aquifers - [in]In zone one[ all], each sewer [lines]line, sewer lateral, and [laterals]sewer maintenance access shall be constructed in accordance with Subsection R309-515-6[,](4), and shall be at least 10 feet from the wellhead or margin of the collection area. (4) Use waivers for the VOC and pesticide parameter groups may be issued if the inventory of potential contamination sources indicates that the chemicals within these parameter groups are not used, disposed of, stored, transported, or manufactured within zones one, two, and three or the management area. (5) Replacement Wells - A PER is not required for proposed wells[,] if the PWS receives written notification from the Director that the well is classified as a replacement well. [ ]The PWS must submit a letter requesting that the well be classified as a replacement well and include documentation to show that the conditions required in Subsection R309-600-6([1)(y]24) are met.[ ] If a proposed well is classified as a replacement well, the
PWS is still required to submit and obtain written approval for [all]any other information as required in: (a) DWSP Plan for New Sources of Drinking Water[ (], refer to Subsection R309-600-13(6)[,]; and (b) the Outline of Well Approval Process[ (], refer to Subsection R309-515-6(5[)).]).
(6) DWSP Plan for New Sources of Drinking Water - The PWS shall submit a DWSP Plan in accordance with Subsection R309-600-7(1) for any new [ground-water]groundwater source of drinking water within one year after the date of the Director's concurrence letter for the PER. [ ]In developing this DWSP Plan, PWSs shall refine
the information in the PER by applying any new, as-constructed characteristics of the source[ (i.e., ], for example pumping rate[,] and aquifer test[, etc.).]. R309-600-14. Contingency Plans. PWSs shall submit a Contingency Plan which includes [all]any sources of drinking water for their entire water system to DDW concurrently with the submission of their first DWSP Plan. [ ]Guidance for developing Contingency Plans may be found in the "Source Protection User's Guide for [Ground-Water]Groundwater Sources."[ ] This document may be obtained from DDW. R309-600-15. Public Notification. A PWSs consumers must be notified that its DWSP [p]Plans are available for their review. [ ]This notification must be released to the public by December 31, 2003. [ ]Public notifications shall address [all]each of the PWS's sources and include[ the following]: (a) [A]a discussion of the general types of potential contamination sources within the protection zones;
(b) an analysis that rates the system's susceptibility to contamination as low, medium, or high; and (c) a statement that the system's complete DWSP [p]Plans are available to the public upon request. Examples of means of notifying the public and examples of public notification material are discussed in
the "Source Protection User's Guide for [Ground-Water]Groundwater Sources" which may be obtained from DDW. R309-600-16. Monitoring Reduction Waivers. (1) Three types of monitoring waivers are available to PWSs. [They are: a) reliably and consistently, b) use, and c) susceptibility. The criteria for establishing a reliably and consistently waiver is set forth in R309-205. The criteria for use and susceptibility waivers follow.]They are: (a) reliably and consistently[]; (b) use;[] and (c) susceptibility. The criteria for establishing a reliably and consistently waiver is set forth in Rule R309-205. The criteria for use and susceptibility waivers follow. (2) If a source's DWSP [p]Plan is due according to the schedule in Section R309-600-3, and is not submitted to DDW, its use and susceptibility waivers for the VOC and pesticide parameter groups[ (], refer to
Subsections R309-205-6(1)(e) and (f); and [(]Subsections R309-205-6(2)(h) and (i[))]), will expire unless an
exception[ (], refer to Section R309-600-4[)], for a new due date has been granted. Additionally, current use and susceptibility waivers for the VOC, pesticide, and unregulated parameter groups will expire upon review of a
DWSP [p]Plan, if these waivers are not addressed in the plan. [ ]Monitoring reduction waivers must be renewed every six years [at the time]when the PWSs Updated DWSP Plans are due and be addressed therein. (3) Use Waivers - If the chemicals within the VOC and[/or] pesticide parameter [group(s) (]groups, refer to Rule R309-200 table 200-3 and 200-2[)], have not been used, disposed, stored, transported, or manufactured within the past five years within zones one, two, and three, the source may be eligible for a use waiver. [ ]To qualify for a VOC [and/]or pesticide use waiver, a PWS must complete the following two steps: (a) List the chemicals which are used, disposed, stored, transported, and manufactured at each potential contamination source within zones one, two, and three where the use of the chemicals within the VOC and pesticide parameter groups are likely; and (b) submit a dated statement which is signed by the system's designated person that none of the VOCs and pesticides within these respective parameter groups have been used, disposed, stored, transported, or
manufactured within the past five years within zones one, two, and three. (4) Susceptibility Waivers - If a source does not qualify for use waivers, and if reliably and consistently waivers have not been issued, it may be eligible for susceptibility waivers. [ ]Susceptibility waivers tolerate the
use, disposal, storage, transport, and manufacture of chemicals within zones one, two, and three as long as the PWS can demonstrate that the source is not susceptible to contamination from them. [ ]To qualify for a VOC [and/]or pesticide susceptibility waiver, a PWS must[ complete the following steps:]:
(a) [S]submit the monitoring results of at least one applicable sample from the VOC [and/]or pesticide parameter [group(s)]groups that has been taken within the past six years. [ ]A non-detectable analysis for each chemical within the parameter [group(s)]groups is required; (b) submit a dated statement from the designated person verifying that the PWS is confident that a susceptibility waiver for the VOC [and/]or pesticide parameter [group(s)]groups will not threaten public health; and (c) verify that the source is developed in a protected aquifer, as defined in Subsection R309-600-6([1)(x]23), and have a public education program which addresses proper use and disposal practices for pesticides and VOCs which is described in the management sections of the DWSP [p]Plan. (5) Special Waiver Conditions - Special scientific or engineering studies or best management practices may be developed to support a request for an exception to [paragraph ]Subsection R309-600-16(4)(c) due to special conditions. [ ]These studies must be approved by the Director before the PWS begins the study.[ ] Special waiver condition studies may include: (a) geology, and construction[/] or grout seal of the well, to demonstrate geologic protection;
(b) memoranda of agreement which addresses best management practices for VOCs and[/or] pesticides with industrial, agricultural, and commercial facilities which use, store, transport, manufacture, or dispose of the chemicals within these parameter groups;
(c) public education programs which address best management practices for VOCs and[/or] pesticides; (d) contaminant quantities; (e) affected land area; and[/or]
(f) fate and transport studies of the VOCs and[/or] pesticides which are listed as hazards at the PCSs within zones one, two, and three, and any other conditions which may be identified by the PWS and approved by the Director. KEY: drinking water, environmental health Date of Last Change: 2024[November 6, 2017] Notice of Continuation: March 12, 2020 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-4-104(1)(a)(iv)
Agenda Item
7(C)
DRINKING WATER BOARD PACKET
Request to Adopt Rule
R309-540 Facility Design and Operation: Pump Stations Presented to the Drinking Water Board
June 25, 2024

PROPOSAL:
The Division of Drinking Water proposed to repeal R309-540, Pump Stations, and to reenact a new
rule in its place. The Division is taking this action to make the requirements for design and construction of pump facilities and hydropneumatic pressure facilities clearer and easier to
follow for public water suppliers. The title of the reenacted rule will be changed from Pump
Stations to Pump and Hydropneumatic Pressure Facilities. Also, the Division made other
nonsubstantive changes in the rule to conform to the Rulewriting Manual for Utah.

The public comment period ended on May 1, 2024, and the Division did not receive any comments on
the proposed rule revision.

HISTORY/CONTEXT:
R309-540, Pump Stations, was adopted in its current form on February 15, 2009. Most of the
requirements of the current rule have been retained in the proposed rule in a reformatted and reorganized form. Some of the requirements of the current rule are unnecessary to support the
purpose of the rule and have not been carried over to the proposed rule. The division would also
like to add new requirements to the rule primarily to provide greater clarity.

Because of the substantial rearrangement of the requirements of the rule, the division is proposing
to repeal the current rule and reenact a new rule in its place. In this case, the repeal and
reenactment process is less complicated than amending the current rule. A list is attached of the major differences between the current rule and the proposed rule.
The proposed rule has been distributed within the Division and to public water systems,
consultants, and others for review. The Division has considered all comments received and revised the proposed rule when necessary. The proposed rule has also been pre-filed with the Office of
Administrative Rules for review as required by Executive Order 2021-12, Establishing Effective
Oversight Over State Agency Rulemaking, issued by Governor Cox on May 6, 2021.

DIVISION STAFF/DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION:
The Division recommends that the Drinking Water Board adopt approve filing to repeal and reenact R309-540 and instruct Division staff to file the appropriate action with the Office of
Administrative Rules (OAR).

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
Request Drinking Water Board Approval to File Proposed Rule: Deadline to File Proposed Rule with OAR:
Publication of Proposed Rule in Utah State Bulletin:
End of 30-Day Comment Period:
Request Board Approval to Adopt Rule:
File Notice of Effective Date with OAR:
Anticipated Effective Date of Proposed Rule:

02/29/2024 03/15/2024
04/01/2024
05/01/2024
06/25/2024 06/26/2024 06/26/2024

COST ESTIMATE:
The Division anticipates that the proposed rule will have no aggregate costs or savings to the state
budget, local governments, small businesses, non-small businesses, or other persons.
The proposed rule only applies to affected persons that own or operate a public water system that
either has or plans to construct pump or hydropneumatic pressure facilities. The proposed rule
amendment is anticipated to have no compliance costs for affected persons because it does not
impose new requirements.
R309. Environmental Quality, Drinking Water. [R309-540. Facility Design and Operation: Pump Stations. R309-540-1. Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to provide specific requirements for pump stations utilized to deliver drinking water to facilities of public water systems. It is intended to be applied in conjunction with rules R309-500 through R309-550. Collectively, these rules govern the design, construction, operation and maintenance of public drinking water system facilities. These rules are intended to assure that such facilities are reliably capable of supplying adequate quantities of water which consistently meet applicable drinking water quality requirements and do not pose a threat to general public health. R309-540-2. Authority. This rule is promulgated by the Drinking Water Board as authorized by Title 19, Environmental Quality Code, Chapter 4, Safe Drinking Water Act, Subsection 104(1)(a)(ii) of the Utah Code and in accordance with
63G-3 of the same, known as the Administrative Rulemaking Act. R309-540-3. Definitions.
Definitions for certain terms used in this rule are given in R309-110 but may be further clarified herein. R309-540-4. General.
Pumping stations shall be designed to maintain the sanitary quality of water and to provide ample quantities of water at sufficient pressure. R309-540-5. Pumping Facilities. (1) Location. (a) The pumping station shall be designed such that: (i) the proposed site will meet the requirements for sanitary protection of water quality, hydraulics of the system, and protection against interruption of service by fire, flood or any other hazard; (ii) the access to the pump station shall be six inches above the surrounding ground and the station located at an elevation which is a minimum of three feet above the 100-year flood elevation, or three feet above the highest recorded flood elevation, which ever is higher, or protected to such elevations; (iii) the station is readily accessible at all times unless permitted to be out of service for the period of inaccessibility; (iv) surrounding ground is graded so as to lead surface drainage away from the station; and
(v) the station is protected to prevent vandalism and entrance by animals or unauthorized persons. (2) Pumping Stations. (a) Building structures for both raw and drinking water shall:
(i) have adequate space for the installation of additional pumping units if needed, and for the safe servicing of all equipment; (ii) be of durable construction, fire and weather resistant, with outward-opening doors;
(iii) have an interior floor elevation at least six inches above the exterior finished grade; (iv) have any underground facilities, especially wet wells, waterproofed; (v) have all interior floors drained in such a manner that the quality of drinking water contained in any wet wells will not be endangered. All floors shall slope at least one percent (one foot every 100 feet) to a suitable drain; and (vi) provide a suitable outlet for drainage from pump glands without discharging onto the floor. (b) Suction wells shall: (i) be watertight; (ii) have floors sloped to permit removal of water and entrained solids; (iii) be covered or otherwise protected against contamination; and (iv) have two pumping compartments or other means to allow the suction well to be taken out of service
for inspection, maintenance, or repair.
(c) Servicing equipment shall consist of: (i) crane-ways, hoist beams, eyebolts, or other adequate facilities for servicing or removal of pumps,
motors or other heavy equipment; (ii) openings in floors, roofs or wherever else needed for removal of heavy or bulky equipment; and (iii) a convenient tool board, or other facilities as needed, for proper maintenance of the equipment. (d) Stairways and ladders shall: (i) be provided between all floors, and in pits or compartments which must be entered; and (ii) have handrails on both sides, and treads of non-slip material. They shall have risers not exceeding nine inches and treads wide enough for safety. (e) Heating provisions shall be adequate for: (i) the comfort of the operator; and (ii) the safe and efficient operation of the equipment. (f) Ventilation shall:
(i) conform to existing local and/or state codes; and (ii) forced ventilation of at least six changes of air per hour shall be provided for all rooms, compartments, pits and other enclosures below ground floor, and any area where unsafe atmosphere may develop
or where excessive heat may be built up. (g) Lighting. Pump stations shall be adequately lighted throughout. All electrical work shall conform to the
requirements of the relevant state and/or local building codes. (h) Sanitary and other conveniences. Plumbing shall be so installed as to prevent contamination of a public water supply. Wastes shall be discharged in accordance with the plumbing code, R317-4, or R317-1-3. (3) Pumps. (a) Capacity. Capacity shall be provided such that the pump or pumps shall be capable of providing the peak day demand of the system or the specific portion of the system serviced. The pumping units shall: (i) have ample capacity to supply the peak day demand against the required distribution system pressure without dangerous overloading; (ii) be driven by prime movers able to meet the maximum horsepower condition of the pumps without use of service factors; (iii) be provided readily available spare parts and tools; and
(iv) be served by control equipment that has proper heater and overload protection for air temperature encountered. (b) Suction Lift.
Suction lift, where possible, shall be avoided. If suction lift is necessary, the required lift shall be within the pump manufacturer's recommended limits and provision shall be made for priming the pumps. (c) Priming.
Prime water shall not be of lesser sanitary quality than that of the water being pumped. Means shall be provided to prevent back siphonage. When an air-operated ejector is used, the screened intake shall draw clean air from a point at least 10 feet above the ground or other source. (4) Booster Pumps. (a) Booster pumps shall be located or controlled so that: (i) they will not produce negative pressure in their suction lines; (ii) automatic cutoff pressure shall be at least 10 psi in the suction line; (iii) automatic or remote control devices shall have a range between the start and cutoff pressure which will prevent excessive cycling; and (iv) a bypass is available. (b) Inline booster pumps (pumps withdrawing water directly from distribution lines without the benefit of
storage and feeding such water directly into other distribution lines rather than storage), in addition to the other
requirements of this section, shall have at least two pumping units (such that with any one pump out of service, the remaining pump or pumps shall be capable of providing the peak day demand of the specific portion of the
system serviced), shall be accessible for servicing and repair and located or controlled so that the intake pressure shall be at least 20 psi when the pump or pumps are in normal operation. (c) Individual home booster pumps shall not be allowed for any individual service from the public water supply main. (5) Automatic and remote controlled stations. All remote controlled stations shall be electrically operated and controlled and shall have signaling apparatus of proven performance. Installation of electrical equipment shall conform with the applicable state and local electrical codes and the National Electrical Code. (6) Appurtenances. (a) Valves. Valves shall be used to permit satisfactory operation, maintenance, and repair of the equipment. If foot
valves are necessary, they shall have a net valve area of at least 2 1/2 times the area of the suction pipe and they shall have a positive-acting check valve on the discharge side between the pump and the shut-off valve. (b) Piping.
Piping within and near pumping stations shall: (i) be designed so that the friction losses will be minimized; (ii) not be subject to contamination;
(iii) have watertight joints; (iv) be protected against surge or water hammer; and (v) be such that each pump has an individual suction line or that the lines shall be so manifolded that they will insure similar hydraulic and operating conditions. (c) Gauges and Meters. Each pump shall: (i) have a standard pressure gauge on its discharge line; (ii) have a compound gauge (capable of indicating negative pressure or vacuum as well as positive pressure) on its suction line; and (iii) have recording gauges in the larger stations. (d) Water Seal. Where pumps utilize water seals, the seals shall: (i) not be supplied with water of a lesser sanitary quality than that of the water being pumped; and (ii) when pumps are sealed with potable water and are pumping water of lesser sanitary quality, the seal
shall be provided with a break tank open to atmospheric pressure, and have an air gap of at least six inches or two pipe diameters, whichever is greater, between the feeder line and the spill line of the tank. (e) Controls.
Controls shall be designed in such a manner that they will operate their prime movers, and accessories, at the rated capacity without dangerous overload. Where two or more pumps are installed, provision shall be made for alternation. Provision shall be made to prevent energizing the motor in the event of a backspin cycle.
Electrical controls shall be protected against flooding. Equipment shall be provided or other arrangements made to prevent surge pressures from activating controls which switch on pumps or activate other equipment outside the normal design cycle of operation. (f) Standby Power. Standby power, to ensure continuous service when the primary power has been interrupted, shall be provided from at least two independent sources or a standby or an auxiliary source shall be provided. If standby power is provided by onsite generators or engines, the fuel storage and fuel line must be designed to protect the water supply from contamination. (g) Water Pre-Lubrication. When automatic pre-lubrication of pump bearings is necessary and an auxiliary direct drive power supply is provided, the pre-lubrication line shall be provided with a valved bypass around the automatic control so that
the bearings can, if necessary, be lubricated manually before the pump is started or the pre-lubrication controls
shall be wired to the auxiliary power supply. R309-540-6. Hydropneumatic Systems. (1) General. Hydropneumatic systems shall comply with all appropriate sections of R309-540-5 except as otherwise indicated herein. Unpressurized ground level or elevated storage, designed in accordance with R309-545, shall be provided for community type public water systems or non-transient non-community systems where a demand in excess of the capacity of the source(s) is required, in addition to the diaphragm or air tanks. Diaphragm or air pressure tank storage shall not be considered for fire protection purposes or effective system storage for community type systems. (2) Location. If diaphragm or air tanks and appurtenances are located below ground, adequate provisions for drainage,
ventilation, maintenance, and flood protection shall be made and the electrical controls shall be located above grade so as to be protected from flooding as required by R309-540-5(6)(e). Any discharge piping from combination air release/vacuum relief valves(air/vac's) or pressure relief valves located in below ground chambers
shall comply with all the pertinent requirements of R309-550-6(6). (3) Operating Pressures. The system shall be designed to provide minimum pressures in R309-105-9 at all points in the
distribution system. A pressure gauge shall be installed on the pressure tank inlet line. (4) Piping. In addition to the bypass required by R309-540-5(4)(iv) on the pumps, the diaphragm or air tanks shall have sufficient bypass piping to permit operation of the hydropneumatic system while one or more of the tanks are being repaired, replaced or painted. (5) Pumps. At least two pumping units shall be provided except for those type systems not requiring unpressurized storage in R309-540-6(1); they may use the pump within their groundwater source to pressurize the diaphragm or air tanks. With any pump out of service the remaining pump or pumps shall be capable of providing the peak instantaneous demand of the system as described in R309-510-9(2), while recharging the pressure tank at 115 percent of the upper pressure setting. Pump cycling shall not exceed 15 starts per hour, with a maximum of ten starts per hour preferred. (6) Pressure Tanks. (a) Pressure tanks shall meet the requirement of state and local laws and regulations for the manufacture
and installation of unfired pressure vessels. Interior coatings or diaphragms used in pressure tanks that will come into contact with the drinking water shall comply with ANSI/NSF Standard 61. Non diaphragm pressure tanks shall have an access manhole, a drain, control equipment consisting of pressure gauge, water sight glass,
automatic or manual air blow-off, means for adding air, and pressure operated start-stop controls for the pumps. (b) The minimum volume of the pressure tank or combination of tanks shall be greater than or equal to the sum of S and the value of CX divided by 4W.
where the following values are used in the equation above: C = minutes per operating cycle, four minutes to meet the requirements of R309-540-6(5) above or preferably six minutes, and is equal to pump ON time plus pump OFF time. X = output capacity rating of the pump(s) at the high pressure condition in the tank(s), in gpm. W = percent of volume withdrawn during a given drop in tank pressure: specifically, between Ph and Pl. W = 100(Ph- Pl)/Ph where Ph = high pressure in tank in psia (high absolute pressure) and Pl = low pressure in tank is psia (low absolute pressure). Values of W range typically from 0.26 to 0.31 for pressure differentials of 15 to 30 psi and high system pressures of 45 to 85 psi at elevations of approximately 5,000 feet. S = water seal volume in gallons, the volume of inactive water remaining in tank at low pressure condition. (7) Air Volume.
The method of adjusting the air volume shall be acceptable to the Director. Air delivered by compressors
to the pressure tank shall be adequately filtered, oil free, and be of adequate volume. Any intake shall be screened and draw clean air from a point at least 10 feet above the ground or other source of possible contamination, unless
the air is filtered by an apparatus approved by the Director. Discharge piping from air relief valves shall be designed and installed with screens to eliminate the possibility of contamination from this source. (8) Water Seal. For air pressure tanks without an internal diaphragm the volume of water remaining in a air pressure tank at the lower pressure setting shall be sufficient to provide an adequate water seal at the outlet to prevent the leakage of air. The following water seal depths shall be considered as minimum requirements. (a) Horizontal outlets shall maintain sufficient depth, as measured from the centerline of the horizontal outlet pipe, such that the depth is greater than or equal to the sum of d and twice the value v2 divided by 2G. (b) Vertical outlets, if unbaffled, the depth shall be the same as in (a) except measured from the pipe outlet; if baffled, the depth shall be greater than or equal to the value v2 divided by 2G.
where the following values are used in the equations above: v = the axial velocity in the pipe outlet for the peak instantaneous demand flow rate of the system. d = the diameter of the outlet pipe in ft.
G = the gravitational constant of 32.2 ft/sec/sec. (9) Standby Power Supply. Where a hydropneumatic system is intended to serve a public water system, categorized as a community
water system as defined in R309-110, a standby source of power shall be provided.] R309-540. Facility Design and Operation: Pump and Hydropneumatic Pressure Facilities. R309-540-1. Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to provide specific requirements for pump stations utilized to deliver drinking water to facilities of public water systems. It is intended to be applied in conjunction with Rules R309-500 through R309-550. Collectively, these rules govern the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of public drinking water system facilities. These rules are intended to assure that facilities are reliably capable of supplying quantities of water which consistently meet applicable drinking water quality requirements of Rules R309-200 and R309-510 and do not pose a threat to general public health. R309-540-2. Authority. This rule is promulgated by the Drinking Water Board as authorized by Title 19, Chapter 4, Safe Drinking Water Act, Subsection 104(1)(a)(ii), and in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3 Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act.
R309-540-3. Definitions. Definitions for certain terms used in this rule are given in Rule R309-110. Terms not defined in Rule
R309-100 but used in Rule R309-540 include those defined in Subsections R309-540-3(1) through (8). (1) "Air-Over-Water Hydropneumatic Tank" means a pressure tank with a single chamber in which air and water are in direct contact. Water pumped into the tank compresses the air above it.
(2) "Bladder Hydropneumatic Tank" means a pressure tank that has a bladder in the bottom section of the tank that holds water under pressure. Water pumped into the bladder compresses the air in the upper section of the tank. (3) "Booster Pump" means a pump that increases pressure in a water distribution system or supplies water to an elevated storage tank. The water supplying a booster pump is provided by a water storage tank or a water distribution line. (4) "Diaphragm Hydropneumatic Tank" means a pressure tank with a fixed, flexible diaphragm that separates water in the lower section of the tank from air in the upper section. Water pumped into the lower section compresses the air in the upper section of the tank. (5) "NSF/ANSI 60" - the joint National Sanitation Foundation/American National Standards Institute 60, Drinking Water Treatment Chemicals - Health Effects
(6) "NSF/ANSI 61" - the joint National Sanitation Foundation/American National Standards Institute 60,
Drinking Water System Components - Health Effects (7) "Pump Station" means a structure housing pumps and associated piping, valves, and auxiliary
equipment. (8) "Service Factor" - A multiplier which, when applied to rated power, indicates a permissible power loading that may be carried under the conditions specified for the service factor. R309-540-4. Applicability. Rule R309-540 applies to a pump, other than a well pump, that pumps drinking water for distribution or storage by a public water system. R309-540-5. Pump Stations. (1) Location. The location for a pump station shall be compatible with the hydraulics of the water system. (2) Flood Protection and Site Drainage.
(a) A pump station shall be located at, or protected from, flooding to an elevation of at least three feet above either the 100-year flood or highest recorded flood, whichever is higher. (b) The site for a pump station shall be graded to direct surface water drainage away from the pump
station. (3) Pump Station Drainage and Flooding Prohibition. A pump station: (a) may not be subject to flooding;
(b) shall be drained to prevent water from collecting on the floor; and (c) shall provide an outlet for drainage from pump glands, air release valves, and other equipment without allowing water to flow across the floor to reach the outlet. See Subsection R309-550-6(6) for clearance requirements for air release vent pipes discharging to floor drains. (4) Access. (a) A pump station shall be accessible. (b) Access to a pump station in an underground vault or compartment or between floors of a pump station shall be provided by a permanent stairway, ladder, or ramp. (5) Construction, Security, and Layout. A pump station shall be: (a) weatherproof; (b) constructed and maintained to exclude animals; (c) locked to prevent unauthorized entry and vandalism; and (d) sized, configured, and equipped to allow for: (i) operation and maintenance; and
(ii) installation and removal of pumps and other equipment. (6) Heating. Heating shall be provided if needed: (a) for the safe and efficient operation of equipment; and
(b) to prevent equipment from freezing. (7) Lighting. Lighting shall be provided to allow for the operation and maintenance of equipment. (8) Ventilation.
(a) Ventilation shall be provided for a pump station. (b) Forced ventilation of at least six air-changes per hour shall be provided for a pump station: (i) in a confined space; (ii) in a subsurface compartment or vault; (iii) if an unsafe atmosphere may develop. (9) Wet Wells. A Finished water wet well at a pump station shall: (a) be waterproof; (b) allow for the removal of water and sediment; (c) be covered to protect the water from contamination; and (d) have an access opening and a lid that meet the requirements for a water storage tank in Section R309-545-14.
(10) Return of Used Water to the Drinking Water System Prohibited. Water withdrawn from a public
drinking water system for any use may not be returned to the system. (11) Automatic and Remote-Controlled Stations.
(a) An automatically operated pump station shall have an automatic signaling apparatus that immediately notifies a water system operator when the station is out of service. (b) A remote-controlled pump station shall be: (i) electrically operated and controlled; and (ii) have an automatic signaling apparatus that immediately notifies a water system operator when the station is out of service. R309-540-6. Pumps. (1) Capacity and Minimum Distribution System Pressure. A pump used to provide minimum distribution system pressure shall: (a) have the capacity to meet the maximum demand of the specific portion of the distribution system
served; and (b) be capable of providing the minimum pressures required by Section R309-105-9. (2) Number of Pumps.
(a) A water supplier shall have at least two pumps installed and in operation at a booster pump facility that provides the only means available to meet the minimum distribution system pressure requirements of Section R309-105-9 for the water distribution pipeline served by the facility.
(b) A booster pump facility that requires at least two pumps shall meet the maximum demand of the water distribution pipeline served by the facility with the largest pump out of service. (3) Booster Pumps. (a) A booster pump shall be equipped with an automatic shutoff or low-pressure controller as recommended by the pump manufacturer. (b) A booster pump withdrawing water from a distribution line shall maintain an intake pressure of at least 20 psi when the pump is in normal operation. (c) A booster pump withdrawing water directly from a water storage tank shall be provided with net positive suction head. (4) Pump Motor. A pump motor shall: (a) be sized to meet operating conditions without overloading; and (b) provide the maximum horsepower required by the pump without the use of a service factor. (5) Certification of Drinking Water Treatment Chemicals and System Components. (a) Chemicals added to drinking water at pump facilities shall be certified to meet NSF/ANSI 60.
(b) Products, components, and materials used in pump facilities that may impart chemical contaminants or impurities to drinking water shall be certified to meet NSF/ANSI 61. (6) Suction Lift. When a pump provides suction lift:
(a) the maximum lift shall be within the pump manufacturer's recommended limits; and (b) tanks priming shall be provided for the pump. (7) Priming.
(a) When a pump requires priming, the priming system shall: (i) use water of at least the same quality as the water being pumped; and (ii) include a means to prevent back siphoning. (b) When an air-operated ejector is used for vacuum priming, it shall draw clean air through a screened intake: (i) at least ten feet above the ground; and (ii) at least ten feet away from a point of contamination. (8) Water Seal. (a) Water used as a seal for a pump shall be of at least the same quality of the water being pumped. (b) A water line supplying drinking water used as a seal for a pump that pumps non-potable water shall be protected from backflow.
(9) Individual Home Booster Pumps. Individual home booster pumps shall not be allowed for any
individual service from the public water supply main. Exceptions may be granted by the Director if it can be shown that the granting of an exception will not jeopardize public health.
R309-540-7. Pump Appurtenances. (1) Valves. (a) Valves shall be provided to allow satisfactory operation and maintenance of a pump facility. (b) Each pump shall have an isolation valve: (i) on the intake side of the pump; and (ii) on the discharge side of the pump. (c) An air release valve shall: (i) be provided where needed to allow the release of accumulated air in pump facility piping; and (ii) meet the requirements of Subsection R309-550-6(6). (d) If used, a foot valve shall be sized according to the manufacturer's recommendation.
(2) Piping. Piping for a pump shall: (a) have watertight joints; and (b) be protected against surge or water hammer
(3) Controls. Controls for a pump shall: (a) be protected from flooding; (b) allow a pump motor to operate at rated capacity without overloading;
(c) have proper overload protection for the air temperature encountered; (d) provide for alternate operation of pumps where two or more pumps are installed; (e) prevent the pump motor from starting during pump backspin; (f) set start and cutoff pressures to prevent continuous on-off cycling; (g) follow manufacturer's requirements for automatic cutoff pressure; and (h) prevent surge pressures from activating controls that turn on pumps or other equipment outside the normal design cycle of operation. (4) Water Pre-Lubrication of Pump Bearings. If water is used for automatic pre-lubrication of pump bearings, and an auxiliary direct-drive power supply is provided: (a) the pre-lubrication line shall have a valved bypass around the automatic control so that the bearings can be lubricated manually before the pump is started; or (b) the pre-lubrication controls shall be wired to the auxiliary power supply. (5) Pressure Measurement. A pump or group of pumps operating together shall have a means of measuring pressure:
(a) on the discharge line; and (b) on the intake line capable of indicating positive and negative pressure. (6) Standby Power Supply.
(a) A community water system that relies solely on a pump facility to supply water to a service area shall be provided with standby power, power using a permanent or portable generator or electrical service from two independent substations.
(b) If a fuel-operated generator provides standby power: (i) the water supply shall be protected from contamination from the fuel supply and fuel line; and (ii) a carbon monoxide detector shall be installed if the generator is located indoors. R309-540-8. Hydropneumatic Facilities for Maintaining Distribution System Pressure. (1) Applicability. (a) Section R309-540-8 applies to a hydropneumatic facility that maintains distribution system pressure for a public water system. (b) Sections R309-540-5 through R309-540-7 apply to a pump, other than a well pump, that supplies water under pressure to a hydropneumatic pressure tank. (c) Section R309-540-8 applies to air-over-water, diaphragm, and bladder hydropneumatic pressure
tanks.
(d)Section R309-540-8 does not apply to:(i)a surge protection tank;
(ii)pressure relief equipment; or(iii)a pressure tank dedicated solely to fire suppression.(2)Number of Pumps. A public water system using a hydropneumatic facility to meet the minimumdistribution system pressure requirements of Section R309-105-9 shall have at least two pumps installed and in operation at the hydropneumatic facility, unless the hydropneumatic facility is supplied solely by a well pump. (3)Pressure Tank Certification. A hydropneumatic pressure tank shall have:(a)NSF/ANSI 61 certification; and(b)ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code certification.(4)Use of Pressure Tank Volume for Water Storage Sizing. A community water system may not use thevolume of a hydropneumatic pressure tank to meet the water storage sizing requirements in Section R309-510-8. (5)Pressure Tank Located Below Ground.
(a)A below-ground location for a hydropneumatic pressure tank and appurtenances shall meet therequirements of: (i)Subsection R309-540-5(2) for flood protection and site drainage;
(ii)Subsection R309-540-5(3) for pump station drainage and flooding prohibition;(iii)Subsection R309-540-5(4)(b) for access; and(iv)Subsection R309-540-5(8) for ventilation.
(b)Electrical controls for a hydropneumatic pressure tank located below ground shall be:(i)located above grade; and(ii)protected from flooding.(6)Operating Pressure Measurement. A means to measure the operating pressures of a hydropneumaticfacility shall be provided. (7) Bypass Piping. Each hydropneumatic tank shall have bypass piping and isolation valves to allow thetank to be removed from service without disruption of water distribution. (8)Pressure Tank Sizing. The minimum volume of a hydropneumatic tank shall be sized to avoidcontinuous pump cycling as recommended by the manufacturer. (9) Air-Over-Water Pressure Tanks.(a)An air-over-water pressure tank shall have:(i)an access opening;(ii) a drain;(iii) a means to measure pressure;
(iv)a means to measure the water level in the tank;(v)an automatic or manual air blow-off;(vi)a means for adding air; and
(vii)pressure operated start-stop controls for a pump.(b)Air delivered by a compressor to an air-over-water pressure tank shall be:(i)drawn from a point above ground;
(ii) free of contamination;(iii)filtered; and(iv) oil free.(c)The volume of water remaining in an air-over-water pressure tank at the lowest pressure setting shallprovide a water seal at the water outlet to prevent the leakage of air.
KEY: drinking water, pumps, hydropneumatic systems, individual home booster pumps Date of Last Change: [February 15, 2009]2024 Notice of Continuation: March 12, 2020
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-4-104
Agenda Item
8(A)
Net Federal SRF Grants: $240,270,701 Principal (P): $34,535,594 Total:$3,344,295 Total:$2,975,781
Total State Matches: $50,999,400 Interest (I): $27,243,983
Closed Loans: -$255,368,491 Total P & I:$61,779,578
Total Grant Dollars:$35,901,610
Total Federal State Revolving Fund: $101,025,483
Total Federal Hardship Fund: $2,975,781
Subtotal: $104,001,263
Less:
Authorized & Partially Disbursed Closed Loans: $138,562,071
Authorized Federal Hardship: $1,094,639
Subtotal: $139,656,710
Proposed Federal Project(s): $18,528,693
Proposed Federal Hardship Project(s):$0
Subtotal: $18,528,693
AS OF:-$56,065,281
$1,881,142
Total Balance of ALL Funds after deducting proposed actions:-$54,184,139
Projected Receipts thru June 1, 2025
2023 Fed SRF Supplemental and Base grant & State Match $0
2024 Fed SRF Base & Supplemental Grants & State Match $25,192,690
Interest on Investments $3,450,000
Principal Payments $8,885,837
Interest on loans $1,199,930
Hardship & Technical Assistance fees $1,029,730
Fund 5215 principal & int payments $104,200
Total: $39,862,387
06/01/25 Total Estimated Federal SRF Funds Available through: 06/01/2025 -$14,321,752
See "DDW Cash Flow Forecast" file for additional information
Minimum Closed Subsidy Status
$6,500,000 $7,874,462 COMPLETE
$6,758,180 $3,852,670 INCOMPLETE
$13,258,180 $11,727,132
2022
Total:
$0
Receive 60% in January
2023
SRF Subsidization Requirements - Base & Supplemental Grants
Grant Year Maximum Authorized/Not Closed Subsidy
$12,250,000
$24,986,570
$0
$0
$12,736,570
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
FEDERAL SRF
as of May 31, 2024
1997 thru 2023 SRF Grants Principal Repayments Earnings on Invested Cash Balance
FEDERAL SECOND ROUND FUNDFIRST ROUND FUND
Hardship Fund
SUMMARY
TOTAL REMAINING HARDSHIP FUNDS:
TOTAL REMAINING LOAN FUNDS:May 31, 2024
PROPOSED
LESS
AUTHORIZED &
PARTIALLY
DISBURSED
6/12/2024 4:12 PM Federal SRF - STATUS REPORT - DWB Status Report
Total Project Terms Loan #Loan Forgiveness Total
Cornish Town - pws 03005 03005 $ 1,704,922 0%, 30 yrs 3F1812 02-Nov-21 ? June 2024 ?754,000$ 750,922$ 1,504,922$
Skyline Mountain SSD - pws 20043 $ 3,123,000 2.09% HGA Fee 30yrs 3F1831 11-Jan-22 3,123,000$ -$ 3,123,000$
M & J Trailer Home Community - pws 02078 $ 768,000 0%, 40 years 3F1848 16-May-23 ? June 2024 438,000$ 270,000$ $ 708,000
Roosevelt City - pws 07004 $ 2,951,400 100% PF 3F1854 08-Jun-22 -$ 2,841,400$ 2,841,400$
Henefer Town - pws 22005 $ 2,100,000 1% HGA 30 yrs lof $21k 3F1843 07-Jun-22 2,100,000$ -$ 2,100,000$
Henefer Town - pws 22005 (add'l funds) $ 6,573,000 1% HGA 30 yrs lof $11k 3F1843 16-May-23 1,100,000$ -$ $ 1,100,000
Johnson WID - pws 07006 $ 2,452,000 100% PF 3F1862 21-Jul-22 -$ $ 2,352,000 $ 2,352,000 Holden Town - pws 14013 $ 8,841,000 0%, 40 years 3F1847 21-Jul-22 5,191,000$ 3,100,000$ $ 8,291,000 San Juan County - NTUA Westwater #2 - PWS 19000 $ 4,355,105 100% PF 3F1821P 11-Jan-22 -$ 457,000$ 457,000$
San Juan County La Sal pws 19000 $ 60,000 100% PF 3F1871P 07-Jun-22 -$ 60,000$ 60,000$
Brian Head Town - PWS 11001 $ 1,761,920 0%, 40 years 3F1861 16-May-23 632,000$ 271,934$ $ 903,934
Brian Head Town - PWS 11001 $ 6,769,206 0%, 40 years 3F1910 16-May-23 3,838,000$ 1,645,748$ $ 5,483,748
Hanna Water & Sewer ID 07062 $ 3,483,838 0%, 40 years 3F1883 31-Aug-22 860,000$ 2,623,838$ $ 3,483,838
Leeds Domestic Users Assn - pws 27010 $ 7,797,500 0%, 40 yrs; refi existing $273K loan 3F1892 31-Aug-22 ? June 2024 ?4,293,000$ 3,009,500$ $ 7,302,500
Ballard WID - pws 24001 $ 7,287,000 0%, 40 years 3F1896 31-Aug-22 3,600,000$ 3,050,000$ $ 6,650,000
Ballard (design advance + test well)100% PF 3F1896 07-Nov-23 -$ 450,000$ $ 450,000
Timber Lakes Water SSD - pws 26057 $ 3,295,630 0%, 40 years 3F1877 31-Aug-22 3,263,000$ -$ $ 3,263,000
Upper Whittemore Water Co-PWS 25136 $ 500,000 0%, 20 yrs 3F1900 01-Nov-22 250,000$ 250,000$ $ 500,000
South Duchesne Culinary Water - PWS
07067 $ 1,992,500 2%, 30 yrs 3F1879A 21-Jul-22 -$ 482,000$
Ogden City - PWS 29011 $ 87,000,000 1% 30 years 3F1908 10-Jan-23 34,370,000$ -$ $ 34,370,000
Virgin Town - PWS 27020 $ 3,470,489 0%, 40 years 3F1909 16-May-23 2,140,000$ 930,489$ $ 3,070,489 Paragonah $ 7,752,100 0%, 40 years 3F1913 16-May-23 5,110,000$ 2,190,000$ $ 7,300,000 Green River (see Emerging Contam. tab for P/F) $ 5,575,000 3.16%, 30 yrs 3F1925E 16-May-23 2,045,000$ -$ $ 2,045,000 Spring City $ 5,932,000 1%, 40 yrs 3F1926 16-May-23 4,338,000$ 1,494,000$ $ 5,832,000
Stockton Town (Add'l $$ & Design Advance)1%, 40 yrs 3F1928 27-Jun-23 2,240,000$ 960,000$ $ 3,200,000
Green Hills Estates WSID $ 2,067,000 1%, 30 yrs 3F1930E 16-May-23 926,000$ 351,000$ $ 1,277,000
Payson City - Christian Life Assembly 343,000 100% PF 3F2003 27-Jun-23 -$ 343,000$ $ 343,000
Fremont Waterworks Company 28002 1,425,000 1%, 30 yrs 3F2016 30-Aug-23 997,000$ 428,000$ $ 1,425,000
Foothill Water Users Assoc - $ 603,030 0%, 40 years 3F2006 07-Nov-23 422,000$ 181,030$ $ 603,030
Holiday Hills HOA $ 250,000 0%, 20yrs 3F2025 07-Nov-23 175,000$ 75,000$ $ 250,000
Holiday Hills (additional funding) $ 855,830 0%, 40 years 3F2025 30-Apr-24 $424,000 $181,830 605,830$
Big Plains Water SSD 27069 $ 3,370,000 100% PF 3F2032 29-Feb-24 -$ 3,370,000$ 3,370,000$
Desert Sage HOA - switch to State & Ashley Valley 0%, 30yrs (deauth ARPA; fed?!)3F1859A 30-Apr-24 $ - -$ -$
Summit Service Area #3 $ 3,302,414 0.5%, 40 years 3F2075 24-May-24 $ - $ 3,302,414 $ 3,302,414
82,629,000$ $ 34,939,105 $ 117,568,105 $ 482,000
30%
Date Closed Loan PF Fund 5215
-$ $ -
Rural Water Assn of Utah 676,000$ 5 yr contract for Development SpecialistOngoing 07-Jan-18 6/5/2018 -$ $ 2,600
Rural Water Assn of Utah CONTRACT # 21-6428
Hyde Park City 5,994,000$ 2.91% HGF 20 yrs 3F1744 14-Jan-20 4/15/2021 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ Bicknell 2,278,000$ 1% 30 yrs HGA?3F1786 08-Jun-21 8/18/2022 408,000$ 270,000$ 678,000$ Weber Meadowview Ranch - pws 22009 $ 2,258,400 0%, 40 years 3F1815 18-Nov-21 7/19/2023 $ 560,000 560,000$ Blanding City - West Water PWS 19001 40,000$ 100% PF 3F1816P 22-Sep-21 3/29/2022 $ 4,503
Cornish Town - pws 03005 40,000$ 100% PF 3F1826P 22-Nov-21 1/18/2022 $ 40,000 High Valley Water Company - pws 22021 4,009,000$ 0%, 30 yrs 3F1835 16-May-23 6/6/2023 1,105,000$ 1,104,000$ 2,209,000$ Timber Lakes Water SSD - pws 26057 40,000$ 100% PF 3F1840P 25-Feb-22 4/14/2022 $ 19,584 Pine Valley Mt Farms - pws 27061 12,000$ 100% PF 3F1868P 18-Jul-22 8/15/2022 $ 520 Granger-Hunter Improve District - pws 18007 13,811,820$ .5% hga fee 30 yrs 3F1850 21-Jul-22 5/9/2023 $ 9,480,000 $ 2,432,620 $ 11,912,620
Ouray Park WID 40,000$ 100% PF 3F1865P 31-Aug-22 6/12/2023 20$ 20$
Beaver City - pws 01001 $ 2,829,146 0%, 40 years 3F1874 21-Jul-22 8/17/2023 $ 797,000 $ 805,620 $ 1,602,620
Wallsburg Town - First Round 26009 $ 6,933,000 0%, 40 years 3F1889 31-Aug-22 4/18/2024 $ -
Pine Valley Mt Farms - pws 27061 700,000$ 100% PF 3F1890 31-Aug-22 4/4/2023 $ 630,015 $ 630,015
Wilson Arch Wtr & Swr Co 19069 $ 1,498,000 0% int/hgf 30 yrs 3F1904 01-Nov-22 4/9/2024 149,000$ 31,600$ $ 180,600
Beaver Dam Village SSD $ 32,900 100% PF 3F1921P 18-Apr-23 5/23/2023 $ - $ 16,642
Spring City (advance)P/F planning/design Advance 3F1926 16-May-23 6/12/2023 -$ $ -
Henrieville Town $ 49,000 100% PF 3F1914P 25-May-23 6/20/2023 $ - $ 15,200 Highlands Water Company 15005 $ 40,000 0%, 5 years 3F1917P 15-Jun-23 7/3/2023 40,000$ $ 40,000
Wales Town $ 80,000 100% PF 3F1929 16-May-23 7/3/2023 3,406$ $ 3,406
Green Hills Estates WSID (advance) 29053 PF 3F1930E 16-May-23 12/27/2023 -$ $ - Price Municipal Corporation $ 85,890 100% PF 3F2000P 14-Jun-23 7/3/2023 $ - $ 85,890 Big Plains Water SSD 27069 $ 35,200 100% PF 3F2007P 20-Jun-23 7/5/2023 $ 35,200 $ 35,200 Hinckley Town $ 39,000 100% PF 3F1999P 14-Jun-23 7/11/2023 $ 39,000
Wanship Mutual Water Company 22017 $ 61,500 0%, 5 years 3F1916P 23-Jan-23 9/12/2023 37,485$ 37,485$
LaVerkin City $ 64,600 100% PF 3F2012P 10-Aug-23 10/2/2023 -$ $ 64,600
Neola Water & Sewer District 07005 $ 75,000 100% PF 3F1918P 14-Jun-23 10/2/2023 $ 75,000 $ 75,000
Ukon Water Co. $ 1,530,000 100% PF 3F2002 16-May-23 4/11/2024 -$ 1,530,000$ $ 1,530,000
Cedarview Montwell SSD 07072 $ 80,000 100% PF 3F2026P 12-Feb-24 5/13/2024 -$ $ 80,000
Orderville Town $ 58,600 100% PF 3F2031P 23-Apr-24 5/21/2024 $ - $ 58,600
Joseph Town Water System $ 40,000 100% PF 3F2039P 23-Apr-24 $ - $ 40,000
Kingston Town $ 99,000 100% PF 3F2030P 23-Apr-24 6/3/2024 $ - $ 99,000 Deseret Oasis SSD 14051 $ 46,500 100% PF 3F2023P 23-Apr-24 6/3/2024 $ - $ 46,500 $ -
$ - $ 14,076,485 $ 6,917,481 $ 20,993,966 $ 612,639
$ 138,562,071 $ 1,094,639
AVAILABLE PROJECT FUNDS:(37,536,588)$
Legend: Items newer than 11/30/2023 or needing resolution highlighted yellow = AVAILABLE HARDSHIP FUNDS:1,881,142$
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
FEDERAL STATE REVOVING FUND
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED BUT NOT YET CLOSED
as of May 31, 2024
Hardship Fund
5215
Authorized From Fund 5210
(1st or 2nd Round)PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM Project Closing Date
Scheduled or
Estimated
Authorized
DatePWS #
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & PLANNING:
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED:
TOTAL PLANNING AUTHORIZED:
COMMITTED ADVANCES / AGREEMENTS or PARTIALLY DISBURSED CLOSED 2ND ROUND AGREEMENTS:
Loan
Funds Hardship
1st Round Principal Interest Fund TOTAL
Federal Capitalization Grants and State 20% match $291,270,101
Earnings on Invested 1st Round Funds 3,344,295
Repayments (including interest earnings on 2nd round receipts) 34,535,594 27,243,983 2,975,781 359,369,754
Less:
Closed loans and grants (total drawn) -255,368,491 -255,368,491
SUBTOTAL of Funds Available $35,901,610 $34,535,594 $30,588,278 $2,975,781 $104,001,263
Loans & Grants authorized but not yet closed or fully disbursed -114,788,105 -16,856,485 -6,917,481 -1,094,639 -139,656,710
SUBTOTAL of Funds Available less Authorized -$78,886,495 $17,679,109 $23,670,798 $1,881,142 -$35,690,646
Future Estimates:
Proposed Loans/Grants for current board package -18,528,693 0 -18,528,693
SUBTOTAL of Funds Available less Proposed Loans & Grants -$97,415,188 $17,679,109 $23,670,798 $1,881,142 -$54,219,339
PROJECTIONS THRU June-2025
2023 BIL Supplemental & Match
2023 FED Base SRF Grant & State Match 0
2024 BIL Supplemental & Match 19,666,900
Projected repayments & revenue during the next twelve months 8,990,037 1,199,930 1,029,730 11,219,697
Projected annual investment earnings on invested cash balance 3,600,000 -150,000 3,450,000
TOTAL -$77,748,288 $30,269,146 $24,870,728 $2,760,872 -$19,882,742
2nd Round
Loan Payments
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
FEDERAL SRF LOAN FUNDS
as of May 31, 2024
6/12/2024 4:12 PM Federal SRF - STATUS REPORT - SRF Available Cash
FY21 ARPA Appropriation: $25,000,000
FY22 ARPA Appropriation: $21,500,000
Subtotal: $46,500,000
Less:
Authorized Grants & Closed Grants in Construction: $45,921,540
Subtotal: $45,921,540
Total available after Authorized deducted $578,460
Proposed Loan Project(s):$0
Subtotal:$0
AS OF:
$578,460
Total Balance of Funds:$578,460
Projected Receipts Next Twelve Months:
FY2023 Appropriation and Federal Funding
Total Projections $0
June 1, 2025 Total Estimated ARPA Funds Available through 06-01-2025 $578,460
LESS AUTHORIZED (see Page 2 for
details)
PROPOSED (see Page 2 for
details)
May 31, 2024 TOTAL REMAINING ARPA GRANT FUNDS:
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
ARPA Grant FUNDS
AS OF May 31, 2024
SUMMARY
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
ARPA Grant FUNDS
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED
AS OF May 31, 2024
Date Date Signed/
Community Grant # Authorized Closed/Anticipated Grant Total
Brian Head Town - PWS 11001 3F1861 Jun-22 507,870 507,870
Austin SSD - PWS 21003 3S1803 Jun-22 2,269,000 2,269,000
South Duchesne Culinary Water - PWS 07067 3F1879 Jul-22 1,500,500 1,500,500
Cedarview Montwell SSD - PWS 07072 3S1869 Jul-22 3,324,000 3,324,000
0
Subtotal Loans and Grants Authorized 7,601,370 7,601,370
COMMITTED GRANT AGREEMENTS W/ CONSTRUCTION IN PROCESS
Church Wells SSD - PWS 13002 3F1824 Jan-22 13-Apr-22 2,252,000 2,252,000
Circleville Town - PWS 16002 3S1825 Jan-22 11-Jul-23 3,500,000 3,500,000
Tridell Lapoint SSD - PWS 24009 3S1836 Mar-22 30-Mar-23 3,500,000 3,500,000
Cannonville Town - PWS 09003 3F1838 Mar-22 01-Jul-22 2,360,676 2,360,676
Pinion Forrest SSD - PWS 07073 3F1844 Jun-22 16-Nov-23 299,000 299,000
Axtell Community Service Dist - PWS 20051 3F1845 Jun-22 11-Oct-22 3,255,110 3,255,110
Kane Co WCD - New Paria Subdivision -PWS 13037 3F1852 Jun-22 14-Oct-22 3,359,000 3,379,000
Kane Co WCD - Clark Bench Wtr Co - PWS 13060 3F1853 Jun-22 01-Nov-22 3,444,000 3,464,000
Daggett Co - Dutch John - PWS 05001 planning advance 3F1857 Jun-22 16-Mar-23 135,000 135,000
Daggett Co - Dutch John - PWS 05001 3F1857 Jun-22 06-Nov-23 3,365,000 3,365,000
Escalante City - 09004 - redevelop spring, emergency 3F1860 Jun-22 29-Jul-22 40,000 40,000
North Emery SSD - pws 08007 3S1863 Jun-22 14-Feb-24 1,538,000 1,538,000
Myton City - pws 07002 3S1864 Jun-22 22-Nov-22 650,000 650,000
Ouray Park WID - PWS 24014 3F1866A Jun-22 16-Mar-23 2,871,000 2,871,000
Cedarview Montwell SSD - planning advance PWS 07072 3S1869 Jul-22 21-Sep-22 176,000 176,000
Helper - PWS 04004 planning advance 3F1880 Mar-23 17-Mar-23 400,000 400,000
Helper - PWS 04004 3F1880 Aug-22 20-Feb-24 3,016,000 3,016,000
Blanding - West Water Community - PWS 19001 3F1897 Aug-22 19-Sep-23 3,500,000 3,500,000
Echo Mutual Water Co - emergency 3F1907 Oct-22 13-Feb-23 40,000 40,000
Thompson SSD - 10004 - emergency, flooding 3F1919 Sep-22 17-Jan-23 40,000 40,000
Bicknell Town - emergency spring line repairs 3F2019A Aug-23 05-Mar-24 100,000 100,000
Orderville Town W.S.3F2038A Apr-24 28-May-24 479,384 479,384
TOTAL AUTHORIZED Grant/OR CLOSED; Some are Partially FUNDED $45,921,540 $45,961,540
PROPOSED PROJECTS for June 2024
0
Total Proposed Projects 0 0
Fund 5215
FY22 ARPA Appropriation:$3,500,000
Subtotal:$3,500,000
Less:
Authorized Grants & Closed Grants in Construction:$3,093,764
Subtotal:$3,093,764
Total available after Authorized deducted $406,236
Proposed Loan Project(s):$0
Subtotal:$0
AS OF:
$406,236
Total Balance of Funds:$406,236
Projected Receipts Next Twelve Months:
FY2023 Appropriation and Federal Funding
Total Projections $0
June 1, 2025 Total Estimated ARPA Funds Available through 06-01-2025 $406,236
LESS AUTHORIZED (see Page 2 for
details)
PROPOSED (see Page 2 for
details)
May 31, 2024 TOTAL REMAINING ARPA GRANT FUNDS:
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
LEAD ARPA Grant FUNDS
AS OF May 31, 2024
SUMMARY
Date Date
Community Grant # Authorized Closed/Anticipated Grant Total
Alpine School District 304,816.18 304,816
Beaver County School District 241,872 Mar-24 5,500.00 5,500
Cache District 241873 Mar-24 98,680.00 98,680
Canyons District 199,999.68 200,000
Carbon District 31,874.03 31,874
ChemTech-Ford Laboratories 236194 Jan-23 Jan-23 1,150,000 1,150,000
Cocoon Daycare 393.51 394
Creekside Kids Park City 393.51 394
Davis District 208,141.79 208,142
Emery District 232009 Feb-23 Feb-23 37,776.62 37,777
Grand District 1,500.00 1,500
Iron District 103,413.51 103,414
Just For Kids Adventures 3,000.00 3,000
Kane District 8,307.36 8,307
Little Orchard Preschool 1,574.03 1,574
Logan City District 28,857.14 28,857
Morgan District 11,411.69 11,412
Nebo School District 241333 Dec-23 107,300.00 107,300
Our Lady of Lourdes 393.51 394
Salt Lake District 176,990.48 176,990
Smart Start Learning Center 9,837.66 9,838
South Sevier High School - -
South Summit District 232010 Apr-23 Apr-23 73,192.21 73,192
Time for Families 1,967.53 1,968
Tooele District 30,431.17 30,431
Uintah District 232011 Apr-23 Apr-23 11,936.36 11,936
Utah Catholic Schools 9,050.65 9,051
Utah Community Action 16,133.77 16,134
Walden School of Liberal Arts 3,000.00 3,000
Washington District 23,684.64 23,685
Weber District 425,206.64 425,207
Lollipops 3,000.00 3,000
Progressive Preschool 3,000.00 3,000
Thomas Edison 1,500.00 1,500
Wee Friends Preschool 242018 Apr-24 1,500.00 1,500
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Subtotal Loans and Grants Authorized 3,093,763.67 3,093,763.67
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL AUTHORIZED Grant/OR CLOSED BUT NOT YET FUNDED 3,093,763.67 3,093,763.67
Total Proposed Projects
GRANTS IN PROCESS
PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR APRIL 2024
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
LEAD ARPA Grant FUNDS
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED BUT NOT YET CLOSED
AS OF May 31, 2024
FY22 LSL Grant Loan Portion $26,248,000
FY23 LSL Grant Loan Portion $25,444,800
Subtotal: $51,692,800
Less:
Authorized Grants & Closed Grants and Loans: $45,772,600
Subtotal: $45,772,600
Total available after Authorized deducted $5,920,200
Proposed Loan Project(s):$0
Subtotal:$0
AS OF:
$5,920,200
Total Balance of Funds:$5,920,200
Projected Receipts Next Twelve Months:
FY2024 Appropriation and Federal Funding
Total Projections $26,248,000
June 1, 2025 Total Estimated LSLR Funds Available through 06-01-2025 $32,168,200
PROPOSED (see Page 2 for
details)
May 31, 2024 TOTAL REMAINING LSLR LOAN/GRANT FUNDS:
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
Lead Service Line Grant Funds
as of May 31, 2024
SUMMARY
LESS AUTHORIZED (see Page 2 for
details)
As Of: 5/31/2024
Community Grant #
Date
Authorized
Date Agreement
Executed Loan Grant & P/F Total
Salt Lake City DPU 3F2028 Apr-24 20,175,000 19,350,000 39,525,000
Subtotal Construction Loans and Grants Authorized $20,175,000 $19,350,000 $39,525,000
Marysvale Town 3F1931PL 23-Apr-23 12-Jun-23 100,000$ 100,000
South Salt Lake Water System 3F1933PL 13-Apr-23 20-Jun-23 100,000$ 100,000
Corinne City Corp 3F1939PL 21-Jul-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
LaVerkin City 3F1948PL 18-Jul-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Orderville Town 3F1950PL 25-Apr-23 31-Jul-23 87,000$ 87,000
Antimony Town 3F1951PL 03-Jul-23 14-Aug-23 37,000$ 37,000
Tridell Lapoint Water Improvement District 3F1957PL 25-Apr-23 25-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Escalante City Water System 3F1958PL 12-May-23 03-Jul-23 41,000$ 41,000
Daggett Co-Dutch John Town 3F1959PL 18-Jul-23 31-Jul-23 80,000$ 80,000
Joseph Municipal Water System 3F1960PL 21-Jul-23 31-Jul-23 36,000$ 36,000
Cedar City Waterworks 3F1961PL 28-Apr-23 11-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Neola Water & Sewer District 3F1963PL 18-Jul-23 15-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Fremont Water Works 3F1964PL 21-Jul-23 31-Jul-23 88,000$ 88,000
Rockville Pipeline Company 3F1966PL 21-Jul-23 11-Sep-23 69,000$ 69,000
Ballard Water Improvement District 3F1970PL 20-Jul-23 11-Sep-23 85,000$ 85,000
Kearns Improvement District 3F1972PL 03-May-23 06-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Magna Water District.3F1973PL 05-May-23 17-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Granger-Hunter Improvement District 3F1975PL 03-May-23 03-Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
City of Moab 3F1977PL 15-May-23 12-Jun-23 100,000$ 100,000
Green River City 3F1978PL 12-May-23 31-Jul-23 96,000$ 96,000
Cedarview Montwell SSD 3F1979PL 25-Jul-23 15-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Wellington City 3F1981PL 22-May-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Jensen Water Improvement District 3F1988PL 21-Jul-23 11-Sep-23 96,000$ 96,000
Sandy City - amended 3F1991PL 03-May-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Holden Town Water System 3F1992PL 04-Aug-23 15-Aug-23 73,000$ 73,000
Price Municipal Corporation 3F1996PL 25-Jul-23 31-Aug-23 100,000$ 100,000
Kane County Water Conservancy District 3F2008PL 27-Jun-23 25-Jul-23 389,300$ 389,300
Cannonville Town 3F2011PL 25-Jul-23 31-Aug-23 78,000$ 78,000
Circleville Town Water System 3F1945PL 03-Jul-23 19-Jul-23 83,000$ 83,000
West Corinne Water Company 3F1983PL 20-Jul-23 19-Jul-23 60,000$ 60,000
Springdale Town Water System 3F1965PL 20-Jul-23 02-Oct-23 94,000$ 94,000
Church Wells Special Service District 3F1943P 21-Jul-23 02-Oct-23 37,000$ 37,000
Myton City 3F1980P 18-Jun-23 02-Oct-23 100,000$ 100,000
Junction Town 3F1942P 03-Jul-23 04-Oct-23 53,000$ 53,000
Provo City 3F1934P 13-Jun-23 18-Oct-23 100,000$ 100,000
City of Logan 3F1997P 05-May-23 100,000$ 100,000
North Village Special Service District 3F1953P Jul-23 Jan-24 $ 8,300 8,300
Jordanelle Special Service District 3F1954P Jul-23 Jan-24 $ 15,500 15,500
Twin Creeks Special Service District 3F1955P Jul-23 Jan-24 $ 17,500 17,500
Lead Service Line Grant Funds
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
Fund 5210
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AUTHORIZED, NOT CLOSED
PLANNING PROJECTS AUTHORIZED, IN PROCESS
Charleston Water Conservancy District 3F1967P Jul-23 Feb-24 $ 25,000 25,000
Cedar Fort W.S.3F1945P Jul-23 Apr-24 $ 35,000 35,000
Lyman W.S.3F1941P Jul-23 Mar-24 72,000$ 72,000
Axtell Community Special Service District 3F1989P Jul-23 May-24 75,000$ 75,000
Glen Canyon Special Service District 3F1976P Jul-23 Jan-24 78,000$ 78,000
Panguitch City 3F1962P Jul-23 Dec-23 $86,000 86,000
Milford W.S.3F1998P May-23 Jan-24 90,000$ 90,000
Torrey Town W.S.3F1944P Jul-23 Jan-24 91,000$ 91,000
Ouray Park Water Improvement District 3F1969P Jul-23 Jan-24 93,000$ 93,000
Brian Head Town 3F2010P Jul-23 May-24 $99,000 99,000
Helper Municipal 3F1935P Apr-23 Jan-24 $100,000 100,000
Salt Lake City 3F1972P Apr-23 $100,000 100,000
Moroni City 3F1990P May-23 Jan-24 100,000$ 100,000
Gunnison City 3F1946P Apr-23 Jan-24 100,000$ 100,000
City of St. George 3F1986P May-23 Feb-24 100,000$ 100,000
Sunset City W.S.3F1994P May-23 Feb-24 100,000$ 100,000
East Carbon and Sunnyside 3F1995P Jul-23 100,000$ 100,000
Johnson Water Improvement District 3F1956P Jul-23 Apr-24 100,000$ 100,000
Sigurd Town 3F1940P Aug-23 Oct-23 70,000$ 70,000
Green Hills Country Estates Water Sewer
Improvement District 3F1985P Aug-23 Dec-23 70,000$ 70,000
Scipio Town 3F1932P Aug-23 $98,000 98,000
Salina City 3F1971P Aug-23 Mar-24 $100,000 100,000
Manti City 3F1952P Aug-23 Jan-24 $100,000 100,000
Wellsville City 3F1982P Aug-23 $110,000 110,000
Highland City 3F1936P Aug-23 $110,000 110,000
Boulder Farmstead Water Company 3F1923P Jun-23 Nov-23 37,000$ 37,000
Midvale City 3F2020P Nov-23 Jan-24 100,000$ 100,000
Hanksville Town 3F2042PL Apr-24 May-24 100,000$ 100,000
Roosevelt City 3F2037PL Apr-24 Jun-24 100,000$ 100,000
Goshen Town 3F1987PL Apr-24 Jun-24 85,000$ 85,000
Rubys Inn 3F2034PL Mar-24 May-24 100,000$ 100,000
Subtotal Planning Loans and Grants Authorized $318,000 $5,829,600 $6,147,600
Community Grant #
Date
Authorized
Date Agreement
Executed
Funds Pending Fund
Dispursed Total Funds
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Subtotal Grants and Loans Partially Disbursed -$ $0 $0
TOTALS
Total Authorized Not Closed $45,672,600
Total Closed Partially Dispursed $0
Pending Dispursment Total -$
Total Proposed Projects -$
Total Closed Current FY $100,000
CLOSED PROJECTS PARTIALLY DISBURSED
FY22 EC Grant (excludes set-asides): $6,797,600
FY23 EC Grant (excludes set-asides): $4,520,200
Subtotal: $11,317,800
Less:
Authorized Grants & Closed Grants in Construction: $6,530,000
Subtotal: $6,530,000
Total available after Authorized deducted $4,787,800
Proposed Loan Project(s):$0
Subtotal:$0
AS OF:
$4,787,800
Total Balance of Funds:$4,787,800
Projected Receipts Next Twelve Months:
FY2024 EC Grant
Total Projections $6,800,000
June 1, 2025 Total Estimated EC Funds Available through 06-01-2025 $11,587,800
PROPOSED (see Page 2 for
details)
May 31, 2024 TOTAL REMAINING EC GRANT FUNDS:
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
Emerging Contaminants Grant Funds
as of May 31, 2024
SUMMARY
LESS AUTHORIZED (see Page 2 for
details)
5/31/2024
Date Date Signed/
Community Grant # Authorized Closed/Anticipated Grant Total
Green River (for loan see SRF Commitments tab)3F1925E 16-May-23 3,530,000$ 3,530,000
Green Hills WSID (for loan see SRF Commits tab)3F1930E 16-May-23 22-Dec-23 500,000$ 500,000
Granger-Hunter ID 3F2017E 30-Aug-23 20-Dec-23 2,500,000$ 2,500,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Subtotal Loans and Grants Authorized 6,530,000 6,530,000
TOTAL AUTHORIZED Grant/OR CLOSED; Some are Partially FUNDED $6,530,000 $6,530,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Proposed Projects 0 0
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED BUT NOT YET CLOSED
Emerging Contaminants Grant Funds
Fund 2510
COMMITTED GRANT AGREEMENTS W/ CONSTRUCTION IN PROCESS
PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR MARCH 2024
Cost Date Date
Community Terms Loan # Estimate Authorized Closed/Anticipated Loan (5235) Grant (5240) Total
Austin SSD 0%, 39 yrs 3S1803 476,500 Feb-24 760,000 231,000 991,000
Lynndyl Town 0%, 30 yrs 3S1858 2,048,000 Jun-22 0 173,000 173,000
Bristlecone - pws 09077 100% PF 3S1822 93,500 Jan-22 0 93,500 93,500
Cedarview Montwell SSD 0%, 40 yrs 3S1869A 4,715,000 Jul-22 1,165,000 0 1,165,000
Ephraim City 1%, 20 yrs 3S1828 2,560,000 Jan-22 500,000 0 500,000
Fruitland Wtr SSD - PWS 07058 2.64%, 30 yrs 3S1891 289,769 Aug-22 287,000 0 287,000
Junction Town Water System 1%, 30 yrs 3S1915 1,854,611 May-23 480,000 120,000 600,000
Myton City 4.7%, 20 yrs 3S2041 162,000 Apr-24 162,000 0 162,000
Oak City - PWS 14010, 50% loan 2.62%, 20 yrs 3S1902 275,000 Nov-22 245,000 0 245,000
Manti (irrigation)0%, 40 yrs 3S1924 7,687,000 May-23 7,687,000 0 7,687,000
Bear River WCD-HARPER WARD (#2068)1%, 20 yrs 3S1849 6,251,400 Jun-22 2,840,000 0 2,840,000
Wellsville City 2.4%, 20 yrs 3S2040 3,500,000.00 Apr-24 3,200,000.00 0.00 3,200,000.00
Desert Sage HOA 3S2306 578,460 Jun-22 578,460 578,460 578,460

Subtotal Loans and Grants Authorized 17,904,460 1,195,960 18,521,960
Stockton Town 0%3S1870P 40000 May-22 40,000 0 40,000
Price Municpal Corp 3S1895P 280,000 Aug-22 Oct-22 0 100,000 100,000
Axtell Community Service Distribution 2%, 20 yrs 3S1765P 103,000 Sep-20 Jun-21 0 103,000 103,000
Fayette Town 3S2018P 42,000 Sep-23 0 32,000 32,000
Manti City 3S2013P 250,000 Jun-23 0 100,000 100,000
Subtotal Planning in Process 40,000 335,000 375,000
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition Legis. Pass thru 232043 400,000 Jul-22 May-23 0 289,919 289,919
Powder Mountain WSID 2.54%, 30 yrs 3S1830 1,895,000 Jan-22 Jun-22 300,000 0 300,000
Pleasant Grove City 1.6%, 20 yrs 3S1796 5,400,000 Jun-21 Feb-22 2,300,000 0 2,300,000
Thompson SSD 3S1747P 29,500 Jan-20 Feb-20 0 3,975 3,975
Subtotal Closed Loans Partially Disbursed 2,600,000 293,894 2,893,894
TOTAL AUTHORIZED/PLANNING/OR CLOSED BUT NOT YET FUNDED $20,544,460 $1,824,854 $21,790,854
Grantsville 3,869,466 3,294,000 3,294,000
Deseret Oasis 212,000 155,000 155,000
North Logan 9,030,000 8,030,000 8,030,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Proposed Projects 8,030,000 3,449,000 11,479,000
PROPOSED PROJECTS
Authorized Funding
DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER
PROJECTS AUTHORIZED BUT NOT YET CLOSED
AS OF May 31, 2024
STATE LOAN FUNDS
CLOSED LOANS (partially disbursed)
PLANNING LOANS / GRANTS IN PROCESS
6/12/20244:16 PM State SRF - STATUS REPORT - Commitments
Agenda Item
8(B)
DW SRF LOAN FUNDS
CASH FLOW FORECAST REPORT
May 31, 2024FEDERAL Status & Projections as of 31 May 2024
State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year
FEDERAL STATE REVOLVING FUND (FSRF - 5210)2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Funds Available
Supplemental 2022 Grant not disbursed 12,720,920
Base Grant 2023-24 (est w/o inc & less set-asides) 1,154,870 3,216,090 - - - - -
Future Base Grant State Match (est @ 20%)932,200 - - - - -
BIL SRF-Capitalization Grants 2023 (est)*16,091,100 16,716,600 18,107,800 18,107,800 - - -
Future BIL State Match (est)4,518,000 4,894,000 4,894,000 - - -
SRF - 2nd Round (Fund 5210 Balance)70,414,624 105,664,728 72,619,588 60,071,779 80,311,449 88,701,555 102,136,640
Interest Earnings at 2%1,408,292 2,113,295 1,452,392 1,201,436 1,606,229 1,774,031 2,042,733
Interest Payments (5210)782,409 766,761 751,426 736,397 721,669 707,236 693,091
Loan Repayments 8,582,603 9,011,733 9,462,320 9,935,436 10,432,208 10,953,818 11,501,509
Total Funds Available 111,154,818 142,939,407 107,287,525 94,946,847 93,071,555 102,136,640 116,373,972
PROJECT OBLIGATIONS (Draws-excluding 1st Round!)
Granger Hunter ImpDist: 3F1850 (5,000,000) (4,512,620) (2,400,000)
Hyde Park City (500,000) (1,000,000)
Moroni - 3F1878
Bicknell (678,000)
East Carbon
High Valley Water Company - pws 22021 (700,000) (1,509,000)
Pine Valley Mt Farms - pws 27061 (630,015)
Spring City
Wales Town (3,406)
Highlands Water Company (40,000)
Big Plains Water SSD (35,200)
Panguitch City 3F1855 (1st round)
Beaver City 3F1874 (1,602,620)
Leeds Domestic 3F1892 -
Levan
Ukon (1,530,000)
Weber Meadowview 3F1815 (560,000)
Bridgerland Village 3F1837 -
Wanship Mutual 3F1916P (37,485)
Wallsburg Town 3F1889 (1st round)-
Wilson Arch (180,600)
Neola Water 3F1918P (75,000)
PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS
Authorized Projects Under 2 Million (4,935,258) (1,727,814) (665,644)
Skyline Mountain SSD (1,923,000) (1,200,000)
Roosevelt City (2,001,400) (840,000)
Henefer Secondary Water (1,100,000) (2,100,000)
Johnson WID (2,000,000) (352,000)
Holden Town (4,345,500) (3,945,500)
Brian Head Town (2,741,874) (2,741,874)
Hanna Water & Sewer (2,695,893) (620,691) (167,254)
Wallsburg Town
Leeds Domestic Users Assn (900,000) (3,000,000) (2,000,000) (1,402,500)
TimberLakes SSD 3F1877 (263,000) (3,000,000)
Ballard Water ID 3F1896 (5,500,000) (1,600,000)
M&J Trailers 438,000
Ogden City (10,000,000) (10,000,000) (10,000,000) (4,370,000)
Virgin Town (1,535,245) (1,535,244)
Paragonah (3,350,000) (3,650,000)
Green River (EC portion excluded)(1,000,000) (1,045,000)
Spring City (366,000) (3,099,000) (2,367,000)
Stockton Town (1,500,000) (1,700,000)
Green Hills Estates WSID (EC portion excluded?)(2,047,000)
Big Plains Water SSD (1,370,000) (2,000,000)
Summit County Service Area #3 (3,302,414)
Proposed Projects
Summit County Service Area #3 (Add $)(3,469,003)
Green Hills Estates WSID (add'l funds)(253,000)
Wanship (1,142,690) (2,664,000)
Provo Water Users (Design only)(2,000,000) (5,000,000) (4,000,000)
Est Total Outflow (5,490,091) (70,319,819) (47,215,746) (14,635,398) (4,370,000) - -
Est Fund Balance Available 105,664,728$ 72,619,588$ 60,071,779$ 80,311,449$ 88,701,555$ 102,136,640$ 116,373,972$
*EPA grant awards are usually delayed until the following state fiscal year: e.g. GY22 was received in Sept 2022.
State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year State Fiscal Year
UTAH SRF FUND (STATE SRF FUND 5235)2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Funds Available
Water Development Security Fund 23,684,899$ 22,450,399$ 19,264,699$ 18,732,199$ 18,813,699$ 26,012,099$ 33,391,399$
Sales Tax Revenue 3,587,500 3,587,500 3,587,500 3,587,500 3,587,500 3,587,500 3,587,500
Loan Repayments 3,000,000 3,150,000 3,308,000 3,473,000 3,647,000 3,829,000 4,020,000
Total Funds Available 30,272,399 29,187,899 26,160,199 25,792,699 26,048,199 33,428,599 40,998,899
General Obligations
State Match Transfers - (5,450,200) (4,894,000) (4,894,000) - - -
DDW Administrative Expenses est inc of 3%- (33,000) (34,000) (35,000) (36,100) (37,200) (38,300)
DW SRF LOAN FUNDS
CASH FLOW FORECAST REPORT
May 31, 2024Project Obligations
Pleasant Grove City (2,300,000)
Powder Mtn WSID (300,000)
Tridell Lapoint SSD 0% 40 yrs - - - - - -
Circleville Town 470k loan .5% 30yrs (270,000)
North Emery SSD 0% int 30 yrs (262,000)
-
Loan Authorizations
Bear River WCD-HARPER WARD 1% 20yrs (1,400,000) (1,440,000)
Austin SSD 1.88% 30yrs (186,000) (250,000)
Ephraim City 1% 20yrs (250,000) (250,000)
Enoch City 1% 20yrs
Cedarview Montwell SSD 0% int 40 yrs (1,165,000)
Fruitland SSD (287,000)
Oak City (245,000)
Junction Town Water System (480,000)
Manti (irrigation) (637,000) (2,500,000) (2,500,000) (2,050,000)
Lynndyl Town
-
Planned Projects
Stockton Town (40,000)
Total Obligations (7,822,000) (9,923,200) (7,428,000) (6,979,000) (36,100) (37,200) (38,300) WDSF Unobligated Funds 22,450,399$ 19,264,699$ 18,732,199$ 18,813,699$ 26,012,099$ 33,391,399$ 40,960,599$
Total SRF Funds 128,115,127 91,884,287 78,803,978 99,125,148 114,713,654 135,528,039 157,334,571
Agenda Item
8(C)
Project Priority List
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
June 25,2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR PROJECT PRIORITY LIST
PRESENTED TO THE DRINKING WATER BOARD
There are two new projects being added to the project priority list:
Wanship MWC scored 9.5 priority rating points.Their project will construct a new storage tank,
replace an old spring pipeline,install a new chlorination system,and upgrade lines,valves,and
hydrants throughout the distribution system.
Summit County Service Area #3 scored 3.2 priority rating points.Their project will be to drill a
new well to replace the primary District Well,construct a new well house at its Cresent Site,make
system-wide fire flow improvements,and conduct a well isolation study for their Greenfield Well
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The Financial Assistance Committee recommends the Drinking Water Board approve
the updated Project Priority List.
February 8, 2024 Project Priority List
Authorized
Total Unmet Needs: Total Needs, incl. Recent funding $570,720,871 39,243,650$
da
t
e
BIL

$
ty
p
e
%Green System Name County Pop. ProjectTitle Project Total SRF Assistance
BIL funds authorized Funds Authorized SourceTreat. Stor. Dist.fire-eligiblegrowth-eligsecond hoother-eligibPrincipal Forgiveness
N 9.5 Wanship Summit 204 Construct new storage tank, replace spring pipe $3,806,690.00 $3,806,690 $74.19 $81,600N3.2 Summit County Service Area #3Summit 600 Drill new well, new well house, make system-wid $3,569,003.00 $3,469,003 $105.11 $103,300
A 100 Big Plains - Apple Valley Washingto 763 Emergency Project-Connect Apple Valley to Ced $3,370,000.00 $3,370,000 $3,370,000 $81.29 $38,600 1,350,000$
A 99.3 M&J Trailer Home Box Elder 27 New well, tank, dist line, arsenic tmnt $1,660,000 $1,540,000 $1,540,000 85 65 20 40 $24,596
A 77.1 Brian Head Town Iron New Well drilling and equipping, replace main lin $6,427,292 $5,141,834 $5,483,748 $77.69 $24,900
A 65.8 Brian Head Town Iron 165 Install new transmission line/fire hydrants along $857,986 $507,870 $507,870 20 $82.92 $24,900
A 64.4 Johnson WID Uintah 1,880 upgrading 24,000 ft undersized waterlines $2,452,000 $2,352,000 $2,352,000 40 $58.80 $36,120 2,352,000$
A 63.6 Roosevelt City Duchesne 6,800 pipeline replacement, lining of DI pipe, new pipe $2,951,400 $2,841,400 $2,841,400 25 35 $87.92 $41,000
A 55.9 Ballard Water ID Uintah 1,367 800,000 gal tank, well; 3.5 miles of 12" trans line $7,287,000 $7,100,000 $7,100,000 20 15 30 $113.10 $44,100 3,500,000$
A 53.5 Virgin Town Washington New 500,000 gal water tank and waterline $2,248,000 $1,848,000 $1,848,000 $51.00 $42,700
A 48.9 Roosevelt City Duchesne 8,461 12000 ft of 12" transmission line, 2 PRV stations $2,418,600.00 $2,300,000 $2,300,000
A 48.5 Pinion Forest SSD Duchesne 640 Water treatement improvements: chlorination an $300,000 $300,000 $299,000 50 $43.35 $44,160
A 47.2 Pine Valley Mountain Farms Washingto 144 Tank reburshment, trans line replacement, solar $418,485 $348,500 $630,015 25 30 $92.51 $53,300
A 43.9 Wilson Arch San Juan 27 New water lines, water meters, booster pump, a $1,138,000 $1,138,000 $1,138,000 20 $85.00 $38,300 569,000$
A 40.7 GrangerHunter ID - Emerging CSalt Lake 132,887 WTP to treat manganese on Wells 16& 18 $11,457,840.00 $2,500,000 $13,957,840
A 39.2 Ogden City Davis 88,221 Replace the transmission line that runs down Og $87,000,000 $34,370,000 $34,370,000 $40.78 $$38,700 3,500,000$
A 36.3 Cornish Town Cache 270 well house, RO/Chlorine Treatment, Booster, 25 $1,704,922 $1,504,922 $1,504,922 10 25 25 $71.44 $39,500
A 31.4 Stockton Town Tooele New Well $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $41.51 $50,576
A 29 Hanna Water and Sewer DistricDuchesne 742 200,000 gallon tank, booster pump station, dist l $3,483,838 $3,483,838 $3,483,838 20 $44.14 $30,100
A 28.1 Upper Whittemore Utah 128 chlorinator $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 10 25 $75.00 $46,200 250,000$
A 28 Payson City Utah 22,725 Connect Church to City water system $346,430.00 $346,430 $346,430 $27.33 $45,100
A 28 Leeds Domestic Water Washingto 797 New well, chloirinator, main line and dist line rep $7,524,500 $7,519,500 $7,792,500 20 5 40 $52.30 $40,100
A 27.4 Wallsburg Town Wasatch 300 500,000 gallon tank, new pipeline, PRV $6,933,000 $6,933,000 50 30 $36.06 $52,100
A 27.2 Green Hills Estates WSID Weber New pump house $2,085,287 $1,921,076 $2,047,000 $69,500
A 26.7 North Emery SSD Emery 1,500 new 250,000-gallon tank, replace PRV vaults, re $2,550,000 $2,050,000 $2,050,000 1,538,000$
A 23.7 Foothill WAU Iron 30 250,000 tank, meters, hydrants;wellhouse, well &$603,030.00 $603,030
A 21.7 Wellsville City Cache $3,589,652.00 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 $39.15 $66,000A20.3 Salt Lake City DPU Salt Lake 364,982 Planning & Construction for LSL Inventory & Rep $39,525,000.00 $39,525,000 $39,525,000 $95.83 $46,500 19,350,000$
A 16.5 Paragonah Iron Waterlines, new well, 250,000 gallon tank $7,452,000 $7,300,000 $7,300,000 $31.22 $40,500
A 15.3 Fremont Waterworks CompanyWayne 320 3100 ft. line: new master meters, 6 hydrants, rad $1,429,250.00 $1,425,000
A 13.8 Orderville Town Kane 645 Replace aging pipeline, new pipeline $490,000.00 479,700 $479,700 $72.30 $40,000
A 13.5 Desert Sage AVWID Uintah 55 Watermain replacement, hydrants, meters, servi $598,460 $578,460 $578,000
A 11.5 Bristlecone Garfield 180 SCADA, drainage and overflow relocation $93,500 $93,500 $93,500 8 15 $153.24 $40,100
A 10.4 Myton Town Duchesne 590 New waterline and connections, hydrants.$650,000 $650,000 $650,000
A 10.4 Panguitch Garfield 1,730 9000 lf 10-in mainline, valves, hydrants, connect $1,629,000 $1,609,000 $1,609,000 10 $36.46 $34,600
A 9.8 Holden Town Millard 450 New well, tank, dist lines, meters, chlorination up $8,841,000 $8,691,000 $8,691,000 20 5 15 20 $29.51 $44,500
A 8.5 Hidden Lake Association Summit 364 New well, distribution line, 50,800 gal concrete ta $3,838,040 $3,838,040 $29.17 $68,800
A 7.5 Enoch City Iron 6,500 New 2M Gallon steel tank $1,639,440 $645,000 $645,000
A 0 Henefer (Secondary Irrigation) Summit 1,025 Secondary irrigation $2,100,000 $2,100,000 $2,100,000
N = New Application E= Energy EfficiencyA = Authorized W= Water Efficiency
P = Potential Project- no G= Green Infrastructure
Me
d
i
a
n

A
G
I

Av
g
.

M
o
n
t
h
l
y

W
a
t
e
r

B
i
l
l
Av
g
.

o
f

A
p
p
.

P
r
o
j
.

S
e
g
'
s
.
Utah Federal SRF Program
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y

P
o
i
n
t
s
Project Segments
Pa
r
t
i
a
l

E
l
i
g
i
b
i
l
i
t
y

Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
$970,259,164 $879,803,112

Agenda Item
8(D)(i)(a)
Wanship Mutual Water Company
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
June 25,2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE
APPLICANT’S REQUEST:
Wanship Mutual Water Company is requesting financial assistance to construct a new
storage tank,replace an old spring pipeline,install a new chlorination system,and
upgrade lines,valves,and hydrants throughout the distribution system.This project
scored 9.5 points on the Project Priority List.The total project cost is $3,806,690 and
they are requesting the full amount from the Drinking Water Board.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The local MAGI for the Wanship Mutual Water Company is $81,600,which is 158%of
the State MAGI.The current average water bill is $74.19/ERC,which is 1.09%of the
local MAGI.The estimated after project water bill at full loan for 20 years with 3.4%
interest would be $444.83/ERC or 6.54%of the local MAGI.Based on the after-project
water bill,Wanship Mutual Water Company qualifies to be considered for additional
subsidy.
Option Loan /Grant
Principal
Forgiveness Loan Term
Interest
Rate
Water
Bill
%Local
MAGI
1 100 /0 -$3,806,690 20 yrs 3.4%$444.83 6.54%
2 70 /30 $1,142,690 $2,664,000 20 yrs 3.4%$342.09 5.03%
3 70 /30 $1,142,690 $2,664,000 40 yrs 0%$188.21 2.77%
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The Drinking Water Board authorize a construction loan of $3,806,690 with
$1,142,690 in principal forgiveness to Wanship Mutual Water Company,for a
repayable loan amount of $2,664,000 at 0%interest for 40 years.
Additionally,the Board authorize a release of up to $335,000 from principal
forgiveness for planning and engineering design.
Conditions include they resolve all points on their IPS report.
Wanship Mutual Water Company
June 25,2024
Page 2
APPLICANT’S LOCATION:
Wanship Mutual Water Company is located in Summit County approximately 17 miles
northeast from Park City.
MAP OF APPLICANT’S LOCATION:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Construct a 150,000-gallon tank at the same elevation as the existing 115,000-gallon tank
to meet the system storage needs as well as facilitate future growth.Replace the old
spring pipeline with 3”pipeline and abandon the existing pipeline.The max flow for a
3-inch line at this length and elevation change may be able to convey 70 gpm,while
4-inch line may be able to convey 170 gpm.A 3-inch line should be able to pass all water
from the springs,even if they were to produce much more in the future.Install a new
chlorination system at the end of the pipeline carrying water from the springs to the lower
tank and replace 10”pipeline in the system complete with new valves and hydrants.This
will rid much of the system of antiquated and undersized pipes and will allow Wanship to
meet required fire flow requirements.
Wanship Mutual Water Company
June 25,2024
Page 3
POPULATION GROWTH:
Data for Wanship is not available.2%growth was used based on the combined
projections for the unincorporated areas of Summit County in the projections below.
Year Population Connections
5yr 204 85
15yr 242 101
25yr 280 117
COST ESTIMATE:
Legal/Bonding/Admin $105,000
Engineering –Design $305,000
Engineering –CMS $250,000
Construction $2,590,975
Contingency (~19.99%)$518,025
1%Loan Origination Fee $37,690
Total $3,806,690
COST ALLOCATION:
Funding Source Cost Sharing Percent of Project
DWB Loan (0%,40-yr)$2,664,000 70%
DWB Principal Forgiveness $1,142,690 30%
Total $3,806,690 100%
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
DWB Funding Authorization:June 2024
Complete Design June 2025
DDW Plan Approval:July 2025
Advertise for Bids:July 2025
Bid Opening:August 2025
Loan Closing:December 2025
Begin Construction:March 2026
Complete Construction:September 2026
Wanship Mutual Water Company
June 25,2024
Page 4
IPS SUMMARY:
Code Description Physical
Facilities
Quality
&
Monitoring
Significant
Deficiency
Violations
M007 LACKS ON-GOING ENFORCEMENT
IMPLEMENTATION 15
SP04 ACTIVE SOURCE LACKS APPROVED UPDATES TO
DWSP PLAN 5
27 MONITORING,ROUTINE (DBP),MAJOR –
2/1/2024-2/29/2024
15
27 MONITORING,ROUTINE (DBP),MAJOR –
3/1/2024-3/31/2024 15
Total =50 20 30
Wanship Mutual Water Company
June 25,2024
Page 5
CONTACT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT:Wanship Mutual Water Company
PO Box 612
Coalville UT 84017
Telephone:[phone]
Email:[e-mail]
PRESIDING OFFICIAL &
CONTACT PERSON:Bob Young,President
PO Box 612
Coalville UT 84017
Telephone:[phone]
Email:[e-mail]
TREASURER/RECORDER:NA
CONSULTING ENGINEER:Derek Anderson
Sunrise Engineering
1180 North Mountain Springs Pkwy
Springville UT 84663
Telephone:[phone]
Email:[e-mail]
BOND ATTORNEY:TBD
DRINKING WATER BOARD FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE EVALUATION
SYSTEM NAME:Wanship Mutual Water Co.FUNDING SOURCE:Federal SRF
COUNTY:Summit
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
70 % Loan & 30 % P.F.
ESTIMATED POPULATION:185 NO. OF CONNECTIONS:81 * SYSTEM RATING:APPROVED
CURRENT AVG WATER BILL:$74.19 *PROJECT TOTAL:$3,806,690
CURRENT % OF AGI:1.09%FINANCIAL PTS:16 LOAN AMOUNT:$2,664,000
ESTIMATED MEDIAN AGI:$81,600 PRINC. FORGIVE.:$1,142,690STATE AGI:$51,600 TOTAL REQUEST:$3,806,690
SYSTEM % OF STATE AGI:158%
@ ZERO % @ RBBI EQUIVALENT @ CALCULATED
RATE MKT RATE ANNUAL PAYMENT INTEREST RATE
0%4.08%#REF!**0.00%
SYSTEM
ASSUMED LENGTH OF DEBT, YRS:40 40 40 40
ASSUMED NET EFFECTIVE INT. RATE:0.00%4.08%#REF!0.00%
REQUIRED DEBT SERVICE:$66,600.00 $136,201.12 #REF!$66,600.00
*PARTIAL COVERAGE (15%):$9,990.00 $20,430.17 #REF!$9,990.00 *ADD. COVERAGE AND RESERVE (10%):$6,660.00 $13,620.11 #REF!$6,660.00
$1,027.78 $2,101.87 #REF!$1,027.78

O & M + FUNDED DEPRECIATION:$67,848.00 $67,848.00 $67,848.00 $67,848.00
OTHER DEBT + COVERAGE:$20,906.25 $20,906.25 $20,906.25 $20,906.25
REPLACEMENT RESERVE ACCOUNT:$0.00 $0.00 #REF!$0.00
ANNUAL EXPENSES PER CONNECTION:$1,095.73 $1,095.73 #REF!$1,095.73
$172,004.25 $259,005.65 #REF! $172,004.25
TAX REVENUE:$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
RESIDENCE
MONTHLY NEEDED WATER BILL:$188.21 $277.72 #REF!$188.21
% OF ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME:2.77% 4.08% #REF!2.77%

$0
Storage tank, spring line, distribution lines, and chlorination system
$0.00
ANNUAL NEW DEBT PER CONNECTION:
TOTAL SYSTEM EXPENSES
Agenda Item
8(D)(i)(b)
Provo River Water Users Association Presented to the Drinking Water Board
June 25, 2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE PRESENTED TO THE DRINKING WATER BOARD APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The Provo River Water Users Association (the Association, PRWUA) is requesting
financial assistance to complete the Association’s Deer Creek Dam water intake structure replacement project. The Association is seeking assistance to meet increased project costs, specifically engineering planning and design costs.
The total project cost has reached $100,000,000. The Association has secured funding
from the Board of Water Resources ($65,000,000), the Central Utah Water Conservancy District ($16,946,000) and has already contributed $7,054,000 to the project. The Association is requesting $11,000,000 from the Drinking Water Board.
STAFF COMMENTS The Association provides raw water from Jordanelle Reservoir and Deer Creek Reservoir to water systems along the southern Wasatch Front from Salt Lake Valley to Utah Valley.
Over 1.5 million Utah residents receive drinking water from this source. The source water
intake structure at Deer Creek Reservoir is over 75 years old and has reached the end of its useful life. The structure itself is difficult to access and replacement parts are no longer available, making repair all but impossible. This project is included in the Association’s 2014 Capital Improvement Plan.

Due to the Association’s nature as a raw water provider to many drinking water systems along the Wasatch Front, staff has determined that a Median Adjusted Gross Income analysis will not provide a meaningful indication of the Association’s financial condition or its ability to repay a loan. Instead, staff reviewed the Association’s financial statements
and determined that the Provo River Water Users Association has sufficient financial
capacity to repay the requested financial assistance. Staff’s funding recommendation is similar to financial assistance terms approved by the Board for other large infrastructure construction projects for water conservancy districts.
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Financial Assistance Committee recommends the Drinking Water Board authorize an $11,000,000 engineering planning and design loan for 20 years at 2.0%
Hardship Grant Assessment Fee in lieu of interest to the Provo River Water Users Association for the Deer Creek Intake Structure replacement project.
PRWUA June 25, 2024
Page 2
PROJECT LOCATION
The project is located at Deer Creek Reservoir and Dam in Wasatch County, approximately
15 miles northeast of Orem.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project includes engineering planning and design costs for construction of a new intake structure and rehabilitation or replacement of the guard gates that control water flow to downstream users. These improvements will improve water flow control
and water quality for downstream users, extend the life of the Deer Creek Dam outlet
works, and provide state-of-the art defense mechanisms against aquatic invasive species.

Deer Creek Dam
Intake Structure
PRWUA June 25, 2024
Page 3
POPULATION GROWTH
The population served by this water supply is estimated to increase by 75% by 2060.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
DWB Authorization June 2024
Engineering Planning, Design & Proj Mgmt Ongoing Loan Closing December 2024 Begin Construction April 2023 Complete Construction March 2026

COST ESTIMATE Legal $ 405,500
DDW Loan Origination Fee $ 110,000
Prefund Debt Service Reserve Account $ 335,000 Community Awareness $ 500,000 Engineering – Project Planning/Misc. $ 400,000
22.8%
Engineering – Design $ 5,739,000
Engineering – Feasibility Study $ 2,513,000
Engineering – Program Management $ 1,900,000
Engineering – CMS $ 6,603,000 Construction $ 75,970,000 Contingency $ 5,634,500 7.4%
Total Project Cost $ 100,000,000 COST ALLOCATION
Funding Source Cost Sharing Percent of Project
DWB Loan (20 yrs, 1.5%) $ 11,000,000 11.0%
Local Contribution $ 24,000,000 24.0%
Board of Water Resources $ 65,000,000 65.0%
Total Amount $ 100,000,000 100.0%

PRWUA June 25, 2024
Page 4
CONTACT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Provo River Water Users Association
285 West 1100 North Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 801-796-8770 [e-mail]

PRESIDING OFFICIAL or Jeffrey D. Budge CONTACT PERSON: General Manager Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 801-796-8770
[e-mail]
TREASURER/RECORDER: Jeffrey D. Budge 801-796-8770
CONSULTING ENGINEER: Deon Stockert
AE2S 3400 North Ashton Boulevard, Ste 105 Lehi, UT 84043 701-690-3693
[e-mail]
BOND ATTORNEY: Eric Hunter Chapman and Cutler
215 South State Street, Ste 800 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 801-533-0066 [e-mail]
ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY: Dani Cepernich Spencer Fane 10 Exchange Place 11th Floor
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
801-521-9000 [e-mail] ENVIRONMENTAL Peter Crookston CONSULTANT: US Bureau of Reclamation 302 East 1860 South Provo, UT 84606 801-379-1152
[e-mail]
Provo River Water Users Association
PROPOSED BOND REPAYMENT SCHEDULE 100 % Loan & 0 % P.F.
PRINCIPAL $11,000,000.00 ANTICIPATED CLOSING DATE 01-Jan-25INTEREST2.00%FIRST P&I PAYMENT DUE 01-Jan-26
TERM 20 REVENUE BOND
NOMIN. PAYMENT $672,723.90 PRINC. FORGIVE.:$0.00
BEGINNING DATE OF ENDING PAYM
YEAR BALANCE PAYMENT PAYMENT PRINCIPAL INTEREST BALANCE NO.
=================================================================================================================
2025 $11,000,000.00 $0.00 *$0.00 $0.00 $11,000,000.00 02026$11,000,000.00 $673,000.00 $453,000.00 $220,000.00 $10,547,000.00 1
2027 $10,547,000.00 $672,940.00 $462,000.00 $210,940.00 $10,085,000.00 2
2028 $10,085,000.00 $672,700.00 $471,000.00 $201,700.00 $9,614,000.00 3
2029 $9,614,000.00 $672,280.00 $480,000.00 $192,280.00 $9,134,000.00 4
2030 $9,134,000.00 $672,680.00 $490,000.00 $182,680.00 $8,644,000.00 5
2031 $8,644,000.00 $672,880.00 $500,000.00 $172,880.00 $8,144,000.00 6
2032 $8,144,000.00 $672,880.00 $510,000.00 $162,880.00 $7,634,000.00 7
2033 $7,634,000.00 $672,680.00 $520,000.00 $152,680.00 $7,114,000.00 8
2034 $7,114,000.00 $672,280.00 $530,000.00 $142,280.00 $6,584,000.00 92035$6,584,000.00 $672,680.00 $541,000.00 $131,680.00 $6,043,000.00 10
2036 $6,043,000.00 $672,860.00 $552,000.00 $120,860.00 $5,491,000.00 11
2037 $5,491,000.00 $672,820.00 $563,000.00 $109,820.00 $4,928,000.00 12
2038 $4,928,000.00 $672,560.00 $574,000.00 $98,560.00 $4,354,000.00 13
2039 $4,354,000.00 $673,080.00 $586,000.00 $87,080.00 $3,768,000.00 14
2040 $3,768,000.00 $672,360.00 $597,000.00 $75,360.00 $3,171,000.00 15
2041 $3,171,000.00 $672,420.00 $609,000.00 $63,420.00 $2,562,000.00 16
2042 $2,562,000.00 $673,240.00 $622,000.00 $51,240.00 $1,940,000.00 172043$1,940,000.00 $672,800.00 $634,000.00 $38,800.00 $1,306,000.00 18
2044 $1,306,000.00 $673,120.00 $647,000.00 $26,120.00 $659,000.00 19
2045 $659,000.00 $672,180.00 $659,000.00 $13,180.00 $0.00 20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$13,454,440.00 $11,000,000.00 $2,454,440.00
*Interest Only Payment

Agenda Item
8(D)(i)(c)
Summit County Service Area #3
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
June 25,2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE
APPLICANT’S REQUEST:
Summit County Service Area #3 is requesting financial assistance to drill a new well to
replace the primary District Well and construct a new well house at its Cresent Site,make
system-wide fire flow improvements,and conduct a well isolation study for their
Greenfield Well.
This project scored 3.2 points on the Project Priority List.
The total project cost is $3,569,000.Summit County Service Area #3 is contributing
$100,000 toward the project and they are requesting the balance of $3,469,000 from the
Drinking Water Board.
STAFF COMMENTS:
On May 24,2024,the Drinking Water Board authorized Summit County Service Area #3
a $3,302,414 loan for 40 years at 0.5%interest to replace their primary tank.
The local MAGI for Summit County Service Area #3 is $103,300,which is 200%of the
State MAGI.The current average water bill is $105.11/ERC,which is 1.22%of the local
MAGI.The estimated after project water bill at full loan would be $290.67/ERC or
3.38%of the local MAGI.Based on the after-project water bill,Summit County Service
Area #3 qualifies to be considered for additional subsidy.
Option Loan /Grant
Principal
Forgiveness Loan Term HGA
Water
Bill
%Local
MAGI
1 100%/0%$0 $3,469,000 39 yrs 0.50%$290.67 3.38%
2 70%/30%$1,040,000 $2,429,000 39 yrs 0.50%$277.25 3.22%
3 40%/60%$2,081,000 $1,388,000 39 yrs 0.50%$263.81 3.06%
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The Drinking Water Board authorize a construction loan of $3,469,000 with
$2,018,000 in principal forgiveness to Summit County Service Area #3,for a
repayable loan amount of $1,388,000 at 0.50%for 39 years.
Conditions include they resolve all points on their IPS report.
Summit County Service Area #3
June 25,2024
Page 2
APPLICANT’S LOCATION:
Summit County Service Area #3 is located in Summit County approximately 10 miles
northeast from Park City.
MAP OF APPLICANT’S LOCATION:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Service Area No.3 is a public water supplier located in the Snyderville Basin of
western Summit County.The Service Area manages the water system,which services the
lower Silver Creek neighborhood,as well as roads and trails for all of the Silver Creek
area.It also manages Service Area owned water rights for the majority of the lots in the
upper section.The Service Area is composed mostly of single-family residential lots
(about 2 to 10 acres in size),although there are several businesses in the southern portion
of the Service Area.The Service Area has two sources,the District Well (WS001)and the
Greenfield Well (WS002).
The Service Area proposes to drill a new well to replace the aging District Well.The
primary,District Well,was drilled in 1965 and has a rated capacity of 116 gpm.Due to
the age and growth of the community,the District Well continues to see an accelerated
increase in TDS through the last few years.The critical nature of being the sole
Summit County Service Area #3
June 25,2024
Page 3
year-round well and quickly approaching MCL for TDS,the Service Area is considering
this a critical/emergency to replace the well at a new location to continue to service the
community.
The system also proposes to conduct a study for the Greenfield Well to identify if there is
a current area within the well depth in which the arsenic is being drawn from,and if so,
isolate that zone from the rest of the well to obtain better quality water.The Service Area
drilled the Greenfield Well in 2003 to become the primary well to meet growth and
increase source capacity;however,that well exceeds MCL for arsenic and is currently
only approved to run ~3 months each year to meet demand while being blended to reduce
the average arsenic levels to below 10ppb.
The Water Master Plan commissioned in 2018 identified three locations with deficient fire
flows in the lower section which includes light commercial properties.This portion of the
project is designed to meet current and future fire flow requirements and increase the
efficiency of the system by increasing water lines to 12”and looping dead end sections.
Summit County Service Area #3
June 25,2024
Page 4
POPULATION GROWTH:
Population is based on Summit County Service Area #3’s estimates.
Year Population Connections
Current 600 200
2029 650 220
2034 700 230
COST ESTIMATE:
Engineering –Design $208,300
Engineering –CMS $192,300
Funding/Legal/Bonding –$72,200
Construction –$2,551,720
Contingency (~10%)$417,800
Greenfield Well Study $126,680
Total $3,569,000
COST ALLOCATION:
Funding Source Cost Sharing Percent of Project
DWB Loan (.50%,40-yr)$1,388,000 38%
DWB Grant $2,018,000 59%
Local Contribution $100,000 3%
Total $3,569,000 100%
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
DWB Funding Authorization:June 2024
Complete Design July 2024
DDW Plan Approval:August 2024
Advertise for Bids:August 2024
Bid Opening:September 2024
Loan Closing:October 2024
Begin Construction:October 2024
Complete Construction:August 2025
Summit County Service Area #3
June 25,2024
Page 5
IPS SUMMARY:
Code Description Physical
Facilities
Quality
&
Monitoring
Significant
Deficiency
Violations
SP04 Active Source Lacks Approved
Updates to DWSP Plan
5
SP04 Active Source Lacks Approved
Updates to DWSP Plan
5
Total =10
Summit County Service Area #3
June 25,2024
Page 6
CONTACT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT:Summit County Service Area #3
629 Parkway Dr
Park City,UT 84098
Telephone:[phone]
PRESIDING OFFICIAL &
CONTACT PERSON:Vincent Pao-Borjigin
629 Parkway Dr
Park City,UT 84098
Telephone:[phone]
TREASURER/RECORDER:Scott Sharp
Telephone:[phone]
CONSULTING ENGINEER:Joe Santos
Rimrock Engineering and Development
5513 W 11000 N #435
Highland,UT 84003
Telephone:[phone]
BOND ATTORNEY:Nathan Bracken
Smith Hartvigsen PLLC
257 E 200 S,Ste 500
Salt Lake City,UT 84111
Telephone:[phone]
DRINKING WATER BOARD FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE EVALUATION
SYSTEM NAME: Summit County Service Area #3 FUNDING SOURCE: Federal SRF
COUNTY: Summit County
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

40 % Loan & 60 % P.F.
ESTIMATED POPULATION: 600 NO. OF CONNECTIONS: 210 * SYSTEM RATING: APPROVED
CURRENT AVG WATER BILL: $105.11 * PROJECT TOTAL: $3,569,000
CURRENT % OF AGI: 1.22% FINANCIAL PTS: 36 LOAN AMOUNT: $1,388,000
ESTIMATED MEDIAN AGI: $103,300 PRINC. FORGIVE.: $2,081,000
STATE AGI: $51,600 TOTAL REQUEST: $3,469,000
SYSTEM % OF STATE AGI: 200%
@ ZERO % @ RBBI EQUIVALENT @ CALCULATED
RATE MKT RATE ANNUAL PAYMENT INTEREST RATE
0% 4.08%#REF! **0.50%
SYSTEM
ASSUMED LENGTH OF DEBT, YRS: 39 39 39 39
ASSUMED NET EFFECTIVE INT. RATE: 0.00% 4.08%#REF!0.50%
REQUIRED DEBT SERVICE: $35,589.74 $71,704.10 #REF!$39,261.07
*PARTIAL COVERAGE (15%): $0.00 $0.00 #REF!$0.00
*ADD. COVERAGE AND RESERVE (10%): $3,558.97 $7,170.41 #REF!$3,926.11
$186.42 $375.59 #REF!$205.65

O & M + FUNDED DEPRECIATION: $462,437.00 $462,437.00 $462,437.00 $462,437.00
OTHER DEBT + COVERAGE: $128,937.50 $128,937.50 $128,937.50 $128,937.50
REPLACEMENT RESERVE ACCOUNT: $30,058.84 $31,864.56 #REF!$30,242.40
ANNUAL EXPENSES PER CONNECTION:$2,959.21 $2,967.81 #REF!$2,960.08
$660,582.06 $702,113.57 #REF! $664,804.08
TAX REVENUE: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
RESIDENCE
MONTHLY NEEDED WATER BILL:$262.14 $278.62 #REF!$263.81
% OF ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME:3.05% 3.24% #REF!3.06%

$0
New well, fire flow, well-isolation study
$0.00
ANNUAL NEW DEBT PER CONNECTION:
TOTAL SYSTEM EXPENSES
Agenda Item
7(D)(ii)(a)

Grantsville City Presented to the Drinking Water Board June 25, 2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE PRESENTED TO THE DRINKING WATER BOARD
APPLICANT’S REQUEST: The city of Grantsville is requesting financial assistance to construct a new 2 million-gallon drinking water storage tank.

This project scored 6.6 points on the Project Priority List. The total cost of the project is $3,869,466. The system is contributing $575,466 and is requesting the remaining amount of $3,294,000 from the Drinking Water Board.

STAFF COMMENTS: The local MAGI for the Grantsville City is $63,400, which is 122% of the State MAGI.
The current average water bill is $48.97/ERC, which is 0.93% of the local MAGI. The
estimated after project water bill at full loan would be $61.70/ERC or 1.17% of the local MAGI. Option Loan / Grant Loan Term
Interest
Rate
Water
Bill
% Local
MAGI
1 100/0 $3,294,000 20 yrs 4.08% $61.70 1.17%
2 100/0 $3,294,000 20 yrs 2.00% $60.79 1.15%
3 100/0 $3,294,000 20 yrs 0.00% $60.00 1.14%

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The Financial Assistance Committee recommends the Drinking Water Board authorize a loan of $ 3,294,000 at 4.08% interest for 20 years to Grantsville City.
Conditions include they resolve all points on their IPS report.

Grantsville City June 25, 2024
Page 2
APPLICANT’S LOCATION:

Grantsville City is located in Tooele County approximately 35 miles west from Salt Lake City.
MAP OF APPLICANT’S LOCATION:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project involves the construction of a 2 million-gallon water storage tank for culinary water use. This will include excavation for the concrete storage reservoir along with piping extension from the tank to an interface point that will be connected to tie in the existing system. Waste and drain piping will be extended to a nearby wash with a headwall and
valving will be installed for flow control. Other components include backfilling and site improvements which include fencing and boulders for tank security. SCADA will be needed for intrusion alarms and level monitoring. This new tank is needed to meet the city’s storage requirements.
Grantsville City June 25, 2024
Page 3
POPULATION GROWTH:
Year Population Connections
2024 14,113 4323
2030 15,573 5500
2040 18,471 6500 COST ESTIMATE: Legal/Bonding/Admin $32,500
Engineering - Design $80,650
Engineering - CMS $155,760 Construction - $3,567,616 1% Loan Origination Fee $32,940 Total $3,869,466
COST ALLOCATION:
Funding Source Cost Sharing Percent of Project DWB Loan (4.08 %, 20-yr) $3,294,000 85% Local Contribution $575,466 15%
Total $3,869,466 100% IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: DWB Funding Authorization: June 2024 Complete Design July 2024 DDW Plan Approval: July 2024
Advertise for Bids: July 2024 Bid Opening: August 2024 Loan Closing: November 2024 Begin Construction: March 2025 Complete Construction: September 2025

Grantsville City June 25, 2024
Page 4
IPS SUMMARY:

Code Description Physical Facilities Quality &
Monitoring
Significant Deficiency
Violations
S091 System lacks up to 20% of required source
capacity 15
V031 System lacks up to 20% of required
storage capacity (Fire demand not
included)
15

Total = 30
Grantsville City June 25, 2024
Page 5
CONTACT INFORMATION:

APPLICANT: Grantsville City 429 E Main Street Grantsville, UT 84029 Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
PRESIDING OFFICIAL & CONTACT PERSON: James Waltz 336 W Main Street
Grantsville, Utah 84029
Telephone: [phone] Email: [e-mail] TREASURER/RECORDER: Heidi Jeffries

CONSULTING ENGINEER: Matt Laurendeau 775 W Spring Creek PI #200 Springville, Utah 84663 Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
BOND ATTORNEY: Darcy Stevens 15 W South Temple Ste 1450
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
Telephone: [phone] Email: [e-mail]
DRINKING WATER BOARD FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE EVALUATION
SYSTEM NAME:Grantsville FUNDING SOURCE:State SRF
COUNTY:Tooele
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
100 % Loan & 0 % Grant
ESTIMATED POPULATION:14,113 NO. OF CONNECTIONS:4465 * SYSTEM RATING:APPROVED
CURRENT AVG WATER BILL:$48.97 *PROJECT TOTAL:$3,869,466
CURRENT % OF AGI:0.93%FINANCIAL PTS:50 LOAN AMOUNT:$3,294,000
ESTIMATED MEDIAN AGI:$63,400 GRANT AMOUNT:$0
STATE AGI:$51,600 TOTAL REQUEST:$3,294,000
SYSTEM % OF STATE AGI:123%
@ ZERO % @ RBI EQUIVALENT @ CALCULATED
RATE MKT RATE ANNUAL PAYMENT INTEREST RATE
0%4.08%#REF!**2.00%
SYSTEM
ASSUMED LENGTH OF DEBT, YRS:20 20 20 20
ASSUMED NET EFFECTIVE INT. RATE:0.00%4.08%#REF!2.00%
REQUIRED DEBT SERVICE:$164,700.00 $244,098.38 #REF!$201,450.23
*PARTIAL COVERAGE (15%):$0.00 $0.00 #REF!$0.00
*ADD. COVERAGE AND RESERVE (10%):$16,470.00 $24,409.84 #REF!$20,145.02
$40.58 $60.14 #REF!$49.63
O & M + FUNDED DEPRECIATION:$2,054,650.00 $2,054,650.00 $2,054,650.00 $2,054,650.00
OTHER DEBT + COVERAGE:$254,481.25 $254,481.25 $254,481.25 $254,481.25
REPLACEMENT RESERVE ACCOUNT:$121,146.75 $125,116.67 #REF!$122,984.26
ANNUAL EXPENSES PER CONNECTION:$544.30 $545.18 #REF!$544.71
$2,611,448.00 $2,702,756.14 #REF! $2,653,710.76
TAX REVENUE:$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
RESIDENCE
MONTHLY NEEDED WATER BILL:$60.00 $61.70 #REF!$60.79
% OF ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME:1.14% 1.17% #REF!1.15%

$0
Storage Tank, Pipeline
$0.00
ANNUAL NEW DEBT PER CONNECTION:
TOTAL SYSTEM EXPENSES

Agenda Item
8(D)(ii)(b)
North Logan City Presented to the Drinking Water Board
June 25, 2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE PRESENTED TO THE DRINKING WATER BOARD APPLICANT’S REQUEST
North Logan City is requesting financial assistance to build a 4-million-gallon storage
tank and 9,200 feet of 12-inch diameter transmission line to connect the tank to its existing distribution system. The total project cost is estimated at $9,030,000. North Logan has committed $1,000,000 to the project and is requesting the remaining $8,030,000 from the Drinking Water Board.

STAFF COMMENTS North Logan City currently lacks 265,000 gallons of storage capacity to meet existing
needs, and with expected population growth that shortage is expected to grow to
approximately 3 million gallons over the next 20 years unless the City implements corrective action. The proposed tank and transmission line are included in the City’s recently completed master plan.
North Logan city’s median adjusted gross income (MAGI) is $57,400, which is 111% of
the state MAGI. The City’s current monthly average residential water bill is calculated at $49.45 per equivalent residential connection (ERC), or 1.03% of the local MAGI. According to Division calculations, the required after-project water bill for a full loan for 30 years at 2.25% interest is estimated to be $42.36 per month per ERC, or 0.89% of the
local MAGI. This indicates that North Logan currently collects enough revenue to repay
the loan without raising customer rates.
Option Grant/Loan Grant Loan Years Interest Monthly Rate % of MAGI
Base 0/100 0 $8,030,000 30 2.25% $42.36 0.89%

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Financial Assistance Committee recommends the Drinking Water Board authorize an $8,030,000 construction loan at 2.25% interest to North Logan City to build a 4-million-gallon storage tank and 9,200 feet of 12-inch diameter transmission
line. Conditions include the system resolve all points on its IPS report.
North Logan City June 25, 2024
Page 2
PROJECT LOCATION
North Logan is located in Cache County, immediately north of the City of Logan.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The proposed project includes building a new 4 million-gallon storage tank and 9,200 feet of 12-inch diameter transmission pipeline to connect the tank to the existing distribution system.

North Logan
North Logan City June 25, 2024
Page 3
POPULATION GROWTH
The population served by this water supply is estimated to increase by 75% by 2060.

Year Population Connections
Current 12,005 2,730 2029 13,790 4,597
2034 15,908 5,303
2044 21,173 7,058 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

DWB Authorization June 2024 Complete Design January 2025 DDW Plan Approval February 2025 Advertise for Bids February 2025
Loan Closing June 2025
Begin Construction June 2025 Complete Construction December 2025

COST ESTIMATE
Legal $ 482,000 DDW Loan Origination Fee $ 79,500 Engineering – Design $ 483,000
15.4% Engineering – Permitting $ 26,000
Engineering – CMS $ 520,000 Construction $ 6,685,000 Contingency $ 754,500 11.3% Total Project Cost $ 9,030,000

COST ALLOCATION
Funding Source Cost Sharing Percent of Project
DWB Loan (20 yrs, 1.5%) $ 8,030,000 88.9%
Local Contribution $ 1,000,000 11.1%
Total Amount $ 9,030,000 100.0%

North Logan City June 25, 2024
Page 4
CONTACT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: North Logan City
2076 N 1200 E North Logan, UT 84341 435-752-1310 [e-mail]

PRESIDING OFFICIAL or Jordan Oldham CONTACT PERSON: Public Works Director North Logan, UT 84341 435-452-1310
[e-mail]
TREASURER/RECORDER: Scott Bennett 435-752-1310 ext 22 [e-mail]

CONSULTING ENGINEER: Scott Archibald Sunrise Engineering 2100 N Main Logan, UT 84341
701-690-3693
[e-mail]
BOND ATTORNEY:

CITY ATTORNEY: Seth Tait North Logan City
435-752-1310 ext 14
[e-mail]
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANT: Scott Archibald Sunrise Engineering 2100 N Main Logan, UT 84341
701-690-3693
[e-mail]
DRINKING WATER BOARD FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE EVALUATION
SYSTEM NAME:North Logan City FUNDING SOURCE:State SRF
COUNTY:Cache
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
100 % Loan & 0 % Grant
ESTIMATED POPULATION:12,005 NO. OF CONNECTIONS:3241 * SYSTEM RATING:APPROVED
CURRENT AVG WATER BILL:$49.45 *PROJECT TOTAL:$9,030,000
CURRENT % OF AGI:1.03%FINANCIAL PTS:31 LOAN AMOUNT:$8,030,000
ESTIMATED MEDIAN AGI:$57,400 GRANT AMOUNT:$0
STATE AGI:$51,600 TOTAL REQUEST:$8,030,000
SYSTEM % OF STATE AGI:111%
@ ZERO % @ RBBI EQUIVALENT AT CALCULATED
RATE MKT RATE ANNUAL PAYMENT INTEREST RATE
0%4.08%#REF!**2.25%
SYSTEM
ASSUMED LENGTH OF DEBT, YRS:30 30 30 30
ASSUMED NET EFFECTIVE INT. RATE:0.00%4.08%#REF!2.25%
REQUIRED DEBT SERVICE:$267,666.67 $468,896.90 #REF!$370,980.72
*PARTIAL COVERAGE (15%):$0.00 $0.00 #REF!$0.00
*ADD. COVERAGE AND RESERVE (10%):$26,766.67 $46,889.69 #REF!$37,098.07
$90.85 $159.14 #REF!$125.91
O & M + FUNDED DEPRECIATION:$985,018.00 $985,018.00 $985,018.00 $985,018.00
OTHER DEBT + COVERAGE:$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
REPLACEMENT RESERVE ACCOUNT:$62,634.23 $72,695.74 #REF!$67,799.94
ANNUAL EXPENSES PER CONNECTION:$323.25 $326.35 #REF!$324.84
$1,342,085.57 $1,573,500.33 #REF! $1,460,896.73
TAX REVENUE:$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
RESIDENCE
MONTHLY NEEDED WATER BILL:$39.31 $45.26 #REF!$42.36
% OF ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME:0.82% 0.95% #REF!0.89%

$0
4MG Tank and Transmission Line
$0.00
ANNUAL NEW DEBT PER CONNECTION:
TOTAL SYSTEM EXPENSES

Agenda Item
8(D)(ii)(c)
Deseret Oasis - SSD Presented to the Drinking Water Board June 25, 2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE
APPLICANT’S REQUEST:
Deseret-Oasis SSD is requesting financial assistance for a project that consists of purchasing and installing an emergency generator and updating and installing a SCADA system on the existing treatment plant. These elements were identified as needing to be
addressed in the next 6 months by the State of Utah.
The total cost of the project is $212,000. Hinckley Town is contributing $57,000 to the project as an in-kind contribution. Therefore, Deseret Oasis is requesting the remaining $155,000 from the Drinking Water Board.

STAFF COMMENTS: There is no MAGI for Deseret-Oasis, so the MAGI of Hinckley Town was used.
Hinckley Town’s MAGI is $43,500 which is 84% of the State MAGI. The estimated after
project water bill at full loan would be $49.72/ERC or 1.37% of the local MAGI. Option Loan / Grant Principal Forgiveness Loan Term
Interest Rate (HGA) Water Bill % Local MAGI
1 100/0 $0 $155,000 20 yrs 2.61% $49.72 1.37%

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Drinking Water Board authorize a construction loan of $155,000 to Deseret Oasis
at 2.61% interest/HGA fee for 20 years. Conditions include they resolve all points on their IPS report.

Deseret Oasis - SSD June 25, 2024
Page 2
APPLICANT’S LOCATION:
Deseret-Oasis SSD is located in Millard County approximately 5 miles South from Delta.
MAP OF APPLICANT’S LOCATION:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Deseret-Oasis SSD is requesting financial assistance for a project that consists of
purchasing and installing an emergency generator and updating and installing a SCADA
system on the existing treatment plant. These elements were identified as needing to be addressed in the next 6 months by the State of Utah. This project will help address the IPS deficiencies.

POPULATION GROWTH:
No information was provided, so a conservative .5% growth rate was used.

Year Population Connections
Current 490 204
2030 507 211
2040 532 222
Deseret Oasis - SSD June 25, 2024
Page 3
COST ESTIMATE:
Emergency Generator $109,000
SCADA System $80,000 Water Conservation Plan $3,000 Contingency (~10%) $18,000 DDW Administrative Fee $2,000
Total $212,000 COST ALLOCATION: Funding Source Cost Sharing Percent of Project DWB Loan $155,000 73% Hinckley Town $57,000 27%
Total $212,000 100%
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: DWB Funding Authorization: June 2024 Complete Design July 2024
DDW Plan Approval: August 2024
Advertise for Bids: August 2024 Bid Opening: August 2024 Loan Closing: September 2024 Begin Construction: September 2024
Complete Construction: December 2024
IPS SUMMARY:

Code Description Physical
Facilities
Quality
&
Monitoring
Significant
Deficiency
Violations
VO04 STORAGE TANK LADDERS IN
EXCESS OF 20 FEET LACK SAFETY FEATURE SUCH AS CAGE, HARNESS OR
PLATFORM
15
SP04 ACTIVE SOURCE LACKS APPROVED
UPDATES TO DWSP PLAN
5
TP00
2
CIOC violations 5 months 250

Total = 270 20 250
Deseret Oasis - SSD June 25, 2024
Page 4
CONTACT INFORMATION:

APPLICANT: Deseret - Oasis Special Service District 3300 West 4000 South Delta, UT 84624 Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
PRESIDING OFFICIAL & CONTACT PERSON: Dallas Anderson 3300 W 4000 S
Delta, UT 84624
Telephone: [phone] TREASURER/RECORDER: Jay Finlinson Telephone: [phone]

CONSULTING ENGINEER: Daniel Hawley Jones and DeMille Engineering 1675 S Highway 10 Price, UT 84501
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] BOND ATTORNEY Richard Chamberlain
Chamberlian Associates
225 N 100 E 435-896-4461 Richfield, UT, 84701
DRINKING WATER BOARD FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE EVALUATION
SYSTEM NAME: Deseret Oasis SSD FUNDING SOURCE: State SRF
COUNTY: Millard
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

100 % Loan & 0 % Grant
ESTIMATED POPULATION: 490 NO. OF CONNECTIONS: 204 * SYSTEM RATING:CORRECTIVE ACTION
CURRENT AVG WATER BILL: $43.80 * PROJECT TOTAL: $212,000
CURRENT % OF AGI: 1.21% FINANCIAL PTS: 36 LOAN AMOUNT: $155,000
ESTIMATED MEDIAN AGI: $43,500 GRANT AMOUNT: $0
STATE AGI: $51,600 TOTAL REQUEST: $155,000
SYSTEM % OF STATE AGI: 84%
@ ZERO % @ RBBI EQUIVALENT @ CALCULATED
RATE MKT RATE ANNUAL PAYMENT INTEREST RATE
0% 4.08%#REF! **2.61%
SYSTEM
ASSUMED LENGTH OF DEBT, YRS: 20 20 20 20
ASSUMED NET EFFECTIVE INT. RATE: 0.00% 4.08%#REF!2.61%
REQUIRED DEBT SERVICE: $7,750.00 $11,486.11 #REF!$10,046.41
*PARTIAL COVERAGE (15%): $0.00 $0.00 #REF!$0.00
*ADD. COVERAGE AND RESERVE (10%): $775.00 $1,148.61 #REF!$1,004.64
$41.79 $61.93 #REF!$54.17

O & M + FUNDED DEPRECIATION: $88,831.00 $88,831.00 $88,831.00 $88,831.00
OTHER DEBT + COVERAGE: $16,250.00 $16,250.00 $16,250.00 $16,250.00
REPLACEMENT RESERVE ACCOUNT: $5,479.05 $5,665.86 #REF!$5,593.87
ANNUAL EXPENSES PER CONNECTION:$541.96 $542.88 #REF!$542.52
$119,085.05 $123,381.58 #REF! $121,725.92
TAX REVENUE: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
RESIDENCE
MONTHLY NEEDED WATER BILL:$48.65 $50.40 #REF!$49.72
% OF ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME:1.34% 1.39% #REF!1.37%

$0
Construction project including SCADA, new generator, valving, flow meters and radio read meters.
$0.00
ANNUAL NEW DEBT PER CONNECTION:
TOTAL SYSTEM EXPENSES

Agenda Item
8(D)(iii)(a)

Green Hills Estates Water and Sewer District Presented to the Drinking Water Board June 25, 2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE APPLICANT’S REQUEST:

Green Hills Estates WSID was authorized financial assistance of $2,047,000 to install multimedia filtration with a side stream reverse osmosis system, a new pump house and associated piping and upgrading the SCADA system for the treatment on May 16, 2023.
Since the original authorization by the Drinking Water Board, Green Hills has experienced
high levels of Radionuclides in their sampling and the cost of the treatment plant has increased substantially. Green Hills would like to request an additional $1,253,000 bringing the total request to $3,300,000. These additional funds will cover the increased cost of the treatment plant in the amount of $753,000 and an additional $500,000 to add
the treatment for the Radionuclides.
STAFF COMMENTS: The MAGI for Huntsville was used as it is the closest community to Green Hills Estates
and is $69,500, which is 149% of the State MAGI. The current average water bill is
$85.11/ERC, which is 1.47% of the local MAGI. The estimated (updated) after project water bill at full loan would be $214.42/ERC or 3.70% of the local MAGI. Based on the after project average monthly water bill, Green Hills Estates qualifies to be considered for additional subsidy.

Staff has applied for and received additional funds from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Emerging Contaminants Small Disadvantaged Community funding which allows for more funding to be available to small systems such as Green Hills. Staff in charge of the EC-SDC funds have authorized funding of $1,351,000 from the BIL EC-SDC funding, leaving
$500,000 from BIL EC funding and the balance coming from the Supplemental BIL/Base
SRF funding including principal forgiveness in the amount of $270,000, and the balance as repayable loan in the amount of $1,179,000. This will return $351,000 back to the Supplemental BIL/Base SRF funding.

Option
Loan /
Grant
Principal
Forgiveness Loan Term
Interest Rate
(HGA)
Water
Bill
% Local
MAGI
Original 45/55 $1,121,000 $926,000 30 yrs 1.0% $122.75 2.12%
1 35/65 $2,121,000* $1,179,000 30 yrs 1.0% $131.87 2.28%
*$1,351,000 grant/PF is from EC-SDC funds*

Green Hills Estates Water and Sewer District June 25, 2024
Page 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Drinking Water Board authorize an increase in funding in the amount of $1,253,000 for a total construction loan of $3,300,000 with a combined total of $2,121,000 in principal forgiveness to Green Hills Estates Water and Sewer District, for a repayable loan amount of $1,179,000 at 1.0% interest/HGA Fee for 30 years.
Conditions include they resolve all points on their IPS report.

Green Hills Estates Water and Sewer District June 25, 2024
Page 3
APPLICANT’S LOCATION:
Green Hills Estates WSID is located in Weber County approximately 16 miles East of
Ogden City. MAP OF APPLICANT’S LOCATION:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project will be done in two phases, the first phase will be the multimedia filtration treatment plant and building to treat the Manganese, Iron and Turbidity. Upgrades to
SCADA to include the treatment plant and associated piping and a pump house.
Phase two will include treatment for Radionuclides, if needed. The design of the treatment building is large enough to hold the additional treatment for Radionuclides and assists Green Hills in not having to come back to the DWB for additional funds later if additional treatment is required. They will not know for certain until after the initial
treatment is installed and testing is done for water quality. If additional treatment is not necessary, Green Hills will return any remaining funds that were authorized for RADs treatment.
Green Hills Estates Water and Sewer District June 25, 2024
Page 4
POPULATION GROWTH: Green Hills Estates is unsure what the population is as around 20% of their connections
are part-time residents. They do anticipate adding 2 lots per year.

Year Population Connections
Current 103 2030 113
2040 123
COST ESTIMATE:

Legal/Bonding/Admin $55,000 Engineering - Design $195,000 Engineering - CMS $137,000 Construction - $2,027,000
RADs treatment $500,000 Contingency (~10%) $406,000 1% Loan Origination Fee Total $3,320,000 COST ALLOCATION:

Funding Source Cost Sharing Percent of Project DWB Loan (1.0%, 30-yr) $1,179,000 36% DWB PF $270,000 8% DWB BIL EC PF
EC-SDC Grant
$500,000
$1,351,000
15%
41%
Local Contribution $20,000 >1%
Total $3,320,000 100% IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: DWB Funding Authorization: May 2023
Complete Design Sep 2023 DDW Plan Approval: Oct 2023 Advertise for Bids: May 2024 Bid Opening: May 2024 Loan Closing: July 2024
Begin Construction: July 2024 Complete Construction: June 2025

Green Hills Estates Water and Sewer District June 25, 2024
Page 5

IPS SUMMARY:
Code Description Physical Facilities Quality & Monitoring
Significant Deficiency Violations
PS14 PUMP STATION BUILDING NOT PROPERLY
HEATED, LIGHTED OR VENTILATED 5
PS03 PUMP FACILITY LACKS PRESSURE
GAUGE ON DISCHARGE LINE 15
SP04 ACTIVE SOURCE LACKS APPROVED UPDATES TO
DWSP PLAN (WS001) 5
SO27 NO SHUT OFF VALVE ON WELL DISCHARGE PIPING 5
SP04 ACTIVE SOURCE LACKS APPROVED UPDATES TO DWSP PLAN (WS002) 5
Total = 35
Green Hills Estates Water and Sewer District June 25, 2024
Page 6
CONTACT INFORMATION:

APPLICANT: Green Hills Estates Water and Sewer Improvement District PO Box 453 Huntsville, Utah 84317 Telephone: [phone]

PRESIDING OFFICIAL & CONTACT PERSON: Jean Brill, General Manager PO Box 453
Huntsville, Utah 84317
Telephone: [phone] [e-mail] TREASURER/RECORDER: Jean Brill

CONSULTING ENGINEER: Ryan Taylor T-O Engineers/Ardurra 2175 West 3000 South ste 200 Heber City, Utah 84032
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail] BOND ATTORNEY:

DRINKING WATER BOARD FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE EVALUATION
SYSTEM NAME: Green Hills WSID FUNDING SOURCE: Federal SRF
COUNTY: Weber
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

36 % Loan & 64 % P.F.
ESTIMATED POPULATION: 205 NO. OF CONNECTIONS: 103 * SYSTEM RATING: APPROVED
CURRENT AVG WATER BILL: $85.11 * PROJECT TOTAL: $3,320,000
CURRENT % OF AGI: 1.47% FINANCIAL PTS: 26 LOAN AMOUNT: $1,179,000
ESTIMATED MEDIAN AGI: $69,500 PRINC. FORGIVE.: $2,121,000
STATE AGI: $46,500 TOTAL REQUEST: $3,300,000
SYSTEM % OF STATE AGI: 149%
@ ZERO % @ RBBI EQUIVALENT AFTER REPAYMENT
RATE MKT RATE ANNUAL PAYMENT PENALTY & POINTS
0% 3.85%#REF! **1.00%
SYSTEM
ASSUMED LENGTH OF DEBT, YRS: 30 30 30 30
ASSUMED NET EFFECTIVE INT. RATE: 0.00% 3.85%#REF!1.00%
REQUIRED DEBT SERVICE: $39,300.00 $66,945.39 #REF!$45,684.03
*PARTIAL COVERAGE (15%): $0.00 $10,041.81 #REF!$0.00
*ADD. COVERAGE AND RESERVE (10%): $3,930.00 $6,694.54 #REF!$4,568.40
$419.71 $812.44 #REF!$487.89

O & M + FUNDED DEPRECIATION: $105,193.00 $105,193.00 $105,193.00 $105,193.00
OTHER DEBT + COVERAGE: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
REPLACEMENT RESERVE ACCOUNT: $7,224.65 $0.00 #REF!$7,543.85
ANNUAL EXPENSES PER CONNECTION:$1,091.43 $1,021.29 #REF!$1,094.53
$155,647.65 $188,874.74 #REF! $162,989.28
TAX REVENUE: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
RESIDENCE
MONTHLY NEEDED WATER BILL:$125.93 $152.81 #REF!$131.87
% OF ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME:2.17% 2.64% #REF!2.28%

$0
Pump house, SCADA upgrade, filter tmnt w/RO
$0.00
ANNUAL NEW DEBT PER CONNECTION:
TOTAL SYSTEM EXPENSES

Agenda Item
8(D)(iii)(b)

Foothill Water Users Association – Additional Funds Presented to the Drinking Water Board June 25, 2024 DRINKING WATER BOARD BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE APPLICANT’S REQUEST: On November 7, 2023, Foothill Water Users Association was authorized funding in the amount of
$603,030 to construct a new 250,000-gallon tank, resolve well, wellhouse, and electrical deficiencies, install water meters and fire hydrant risers. The current funding package consists of a loan of $422,000 at 0% interest for 40 years with $181,030 in principal forgiveness. The community within Foothill Water Users Association is currently under an active boil order due to holes in the storage tank. They also do not have adequate fire suppression installed within the community. To help these issues they would like to add a temporary potable water tank to the system until they can finalize the project and install 10 fire hydrants. They also need funds to remove and dispose of the existing water tank. The new estimated project total is $791,554. Foothill Water Users Association is requesting financial assistance from the Drinking Water Board to cover the additional costs of $188,524. STAFF COMMENTS:
The local MAGI for Foothill Water Users Association is $40,100, which is 86% of the State MAGI. The current average water bill is $35.00/ERC, which is 1.05% of the local MAGI. The estimated after project water bill at full loan for 40 years at 3.5% interest would be $439.93/ERC or 13% of
the local MAGI. Based on the after-project water bill, Foothill Water Users Association qualifies to be considered for additional subsidy.
The Foothill Subdivision has a total of sixty-three lots. Currently ten are connected to the water system and fifty-three are standby lots. The association held a meeting to discuss rate increases, including charging the standby lots a monthly fee. They voted to raise the rates to $65 per month for the ten connected users and $18 per month for the standby lots. The motion passed and all in attendance were in favor of the new rates.

Option Loan / Grant Principal Forgiveness Loan Term Interest Rate Water Bill % Local MAGI
Base 100% loan $0 $791,554 40 yrs 3.5% $439.93 13%
1 70/30 $237,554 $554,000 40 yrs 0% $195.10 5.84%
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Drinking Water Board authorize an additional $188,524 to the previous authorized construction loan for a new loan total of $791,554 with $237,554 in principal forgiveness to Foothill Water Users Association, for a repayable loan amount of
$554,000 at 0% interest for 40 years. Conditions include they resolve all points on their IPS report.
Foothill Water Users Association June 25, 2024
Page 2
APPLICANT’S LOCATION:
Foothill Water Users Association is located in Iron County approximately 26 miles northeast of Cedar City. MAP OF APPLICANT’S LOCATION:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Construction of a 250,000-gallon tank is necessary to provide for existing connections and allow for future growth. The current 30-ft tall tank can only fill to a level of about 5-ft due to numerous gashes, bullet holes, and rusted spots due to a lack of tank maintenance. The current tank also lacks many important components and carries approximately 280 IPS points. The existing well is currently unapproved and desperately needs improvements (it currently carries approximately 580 IPS points). These improvements include a lack of required well seal, no smooth-nosed sampling tap on discharge pipe, well casing terminates less than 12 inches above the floor, no pressure gauge on the well discharge pipe, lacks a means to measure water levels, lacks a means to release trapped air, no flow meter on well discharge pipe, unapproved source in service, no check valve on discharge pipe, and many routine monitoring violations. The wellhouse also has many needed improvements. Also adding a potable water tank and 10 fire hydrants.
Foothill Water Users Service Area
Foothill Water Users Association June 25, 2024
Page 3
POPULATION GROWTH: Populations based on 1% growth for Iron County from Kem C Gardner Policy Institute.

Year Population Connections
Current 30 10
10 yr 43 14
20 yr 56 18 COST ESTIMATE: Legal/Bonding/Admin $20,884
Engineering - Design $110,095
Construction - $583,545
Contingency (~10%) $77,030
1% Loan Origination Fee Moved to contingency
Total $791,554
COST ALLOCATION: Funding Source Cost Sharing Percent of Project
DWB Loan (0%, 40-yr) $554,000 70%
DWB PF $237,554 30%
Total $791,554 100%
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: DWB Funding Authorization: June 2024
Complete Design September 2024
DDW Plan Approval: October 2024
Advertise for Bids: October 2024
Bid Opening: November 2024
Loan Closing: December 2024
Begin Construction: January 2025
Complete Construction: April 2025
IPS SUMMARY: See attached report.
Foothill Water Users Association June 25, 2024
Page 4
CONTACT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT: Foothill Water Users Association Foothill Drive Paragonah UT 84760 435-559-0434 [e-mail] PRESIDING OFFICIAL & CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Brown, President 2268 North Cottontail Drive Cedar City UT 84721
435-559-0434 [e-mail] TREASURER/RECORDER: N/A
CONSULTING ENGINEER: Justin Christensen Ensign Engineering & Land Surveying 88 East Fiddlers Canyon Road Ste 210 Cedar City UT 84721 435-865-1453 [e-mail] BOND ATTORNEY: Richard Chamberlain Chamberlain Associates 225 North 100 East
Richfield UT 84701 435-896-4461 [e-mail]
DRINKING WATER BOARD FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE EVALUATION
SYSTEM NAME:Foothill Water Users Association FUNDING SOURCE:Federal SRF
COUNTY:Iron
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
70 % Loan & 30 % P.F.
ESTIMATED POPULATION:30 NO. OF CONNECTIONS:10 * SYSTEM RATING:NOT APPROVED
CURRENT AVG WATER BILL:$35.00 *PROJECT TOTAL:$791,554
CURRENT % OF AGI:1.05%FINANCIAL PTS:29 LOAN AMOUNT:$554,000
ESTIMATED MEDIAN AGI:$40,100 PRINC. FORGIVE.:$237,554STATE AGI:$46,500 TOTAL REQUEST:$791,554
SYSTEM % OF STATE AGI:86%
@ ZERO % @ RBBI EQUIVALENT AFTER REPAYMENT
RATE MKT RATE ANNUAL PAYMENT PENALTY & POINTS
0%4.02%#REF!**0.00%
SYSTEM
ASSUMED LENGTH OF DEBT, YRS:40 40 40 40
ASSUMED NET EFFECTIVE INT. RATE:0.00%4.02%#REF!0.00%
REQUIRED DEBT SERVICE:$13,850.00 $28,073.37 #REF!$13,850.00
*PARTIAL COVERAGE (15%):$2,077.50 $4,211.01 #REF!$2,077.50 *ADD. COVERAGE AND RESERVE (10%):$1,385.00 $2,807.34 #REF!$1,385.00
$1,731.25 $3,509.17 #REF!$1,731.25

O & M + FUNDED DEPRECIATION:$6,099.00 $6,099.00 $6,099.00 $6,099.00
OTHER DEBT + COVERAGE:$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
REPLACEMENT RESERVE ACCOUNT:$0.00 $0.00 #REF!$0.00
ANNUAL EXPENSES PER CONNECTION:$609.90 $609.90 #REF!$609.90
$23,411.50 $41,190.72 #REF! $23,411.50
TAX REVENUE:$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
RESIDENCE
MONTHLY NEEDED WATER BILL:$195.10 $343.26 #REF!$195.10
% OF ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME:5.84% 10.27% #REF!5.84%

$0
New 250,000-gal tank, water meters, 10 fire hydrants, well, wellhouse and electrical improvements, add temp storage tank
$0.00
ANNUAL NEW DEBT PER CONNECTION:
TOTAL SYSTEM EXPENSES
Contacts
Type: Administrative Contact
Name: STEPHEN BROWN
Office: 435-559-0434
Emergency:
Email:
[e-mail]
Site Information
Legal Contact: SCOTTSVILLE
WATER USERS INCORPORATED
Address: 2268 North Cottontail Drive ,
CEDAR CITY, UT 84721
Phone: [phone]
County: IRON COUNTY
System Type: Community
Certification Required: SS
Total Population: 28
Local Health District: Southwest Utah
Public Health Department
Site Updates
Last Inventory Update: 01/22/2024
Last Surveyor Update: 05/23/2024
Surveyor: BRIAN H PATTEE
Operating Period: 1/1 - 12/31
Last IPS Update: 06/12/2024 12:10:00
Political Districts
Representative: 0
Senate: 0
Water Usage Information per ERC
Total Ips Points: 445
Public Water System Inventory ReportDEQ | Drinking Water
Foothill Water Users Association PWS ID: UTAH11099 Rating: Not Approved 03/27/2023 Status: Active

SERVICE CONNECTIONS
Type Meter Type Meter Size Number of Connections
Residential Unknown 0 13
Total Service Connections: 13
TREATMENT PLANTS
ID Plant Name Bin Status Date Design Cap Status
Total Treatment Plants: 0
STORAGE
ID Name Type Effective Volume Material Status Status Reason
ST001 140K GAL TANK Ground 140,000 GAL Steel Active
Total Effective Volume: 140,000
PUMPING STATIONS
ID Station Name Status Reason Capacity Availability
Total Capacity: 0
https://waterlink.utah.gov/reports.html?systemId=1958 1/2
SOURCES
ID Source Name OP Date Status Reason Source Type Water Type Period of Op
WS001 UNDERGROUND WATER WELL Active Well Groundwater ⇓1/1 - 12/31
Total Sources: 1
GROUPED SOURCE SAMPLING STATIONS
Sample Group ID Sample Group Facility Details
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
ID System Name
DS001 UTAH11099 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Total Distribution Systems: 1
SITE VISIT HISTORY
Date Visited Survey Type Surveyor Notified Date Next Inspection
11/24/2020 Compliance Assessment 12/03/2020
12/03/2020 Compliance Assessment 12/03/2020
09/09/2021 Sanitary Survey, Finished WRIGHT, PAUL 09/20/2021 12/31/2024
05/31/2023 Level 1 Assessment HEWETT, DAVID PAUL 05/31/2023
06/12/2023 Compliance Assessment 06/12/2023
12/20/2023 Level 1 Assessment HEWETT, DAVID PAUL 12/20/2023
05/23/2024 Sanitary Survey, Finished PATTEE, BRIAN H 05/28/2024 12/31/2027
FILE UPLOAD HISTORY
File Type File Name Reason for File Uploaded By Uploaded Date
https://waterlink.utah.gov/reports.html?systemId=1958 2/2

Agenda Item
8(D)(iv)(a)

Stockton Town
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
June 25, 2024

DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE

APPLICANT’S REQUEST:

Stockton Town was authorized financial assistance to drill a new well on May 16, 2023 in
the amount of $3,000,000.
This project scored 31.4 points on the Project Priority List.

Staff received a letter from the Stockton mayor on April 19, 2024 thanking the DW Board
for the opportunity but are respectfully declining the funding as they received funds from
another source to complete their project.

STAFF COMMENTS:

The local MAGI for Stockton Town is $50,576, which is 109% of the State MAGI. The
current average water bill is $35.71/ERC, which is 0.85% of the local MAGI. The recent
loan that was authorized did increase their water bill to $41.51. The estimated after project
water bill at full loan would be $93.48/ERC or 2.22% of the local MAGI. Based on the
after project water bill, Stockton Town qualifies to be considered for additional subsidy.

Option Loan / Grant
Principal
Forgiveness Loan Term
Interest
Rate
(HGA)
Water
Bill
% Local
MAGI
Base 100% loan $0 $3,000,000 30 yrs 3.85% $93.48 2.22%
1 80/20 $600,000 $2,400,000 30 yrs 2.50% $73.21 1.74%

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

The Drinking Water Board deauthorize a construction loan of $3,000,000 with
$600,000 in principal forgiveness to Stockton Town, for a repayable loan amount of
$2,400,000 at 2.50% for 30 years.

TOWN OF STOCKTON
18 North Johnson Street
P.O. Box 240
Stockton, Utah 84071
Phone: [phone]
Director Nathan Lundstad
195 North 1950 West,
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Dear Mr. Lundstad:
Recently the Town of Stockton has experienced several hardships with their water supply. In
July of 2022 there was the Jacob City Fire that burned part of Soldier Canyon. Soldier Canyon
supplies all of the culinary water to the Town of Stockton. This fire impacted Stockton's water
supplies for several months, starting in July 2022, In addition to the fire, there were several
floods in Soldier Canyon that also prevented Stockton from using the Soldier Canyon spring
water for culinary purposes. Several members of your staff visited Soldier Canyon and assessed
the damages to the water supply and treatment plant. During this time Stockon had to uses an
emergency well that was powered by emergency generators to provide culinary water to the
Stockton residents. Your staff provided the resources that enabled Stockton to secure funding
for Stockton to install line power for the emergency well. This has provided Stockon with a
backup source of water that Stockton has utilized during their time of need.
The water out of Soldier Canyon has decreased over 70% in the last 20 years. This has caused
Stockton to go on decreased water use and has put a strain on our citizens in that they have had
to go on water restrictions several time since the fire and floods. Your staff, has secured a bond
in May of 2023 of $3,000,000 for the drilling of a new well that would provide Stockton with the
necessary culinary water for its residents. I and the residents of Stockton would like to express
our gratitude to you and your staff for helping us through our difficulty in our water demand and
supply. Michael Grange and Heather Pattee have been at the forefront of these efforts and I
would like to thank them for the dedication in helping us and the residents of the State of Utah.
The Utah Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity has granted Stockton a Water
Infrastructure Projects Grant for $3,000,000 to install a new well for Stockton's culinary water
supply. I would like to return the $3,000,000 bond to the Division of Drinking Water so that it
can be used by other municipalities for their water infrastructures needs.
Thank you and your staff for their commitment on helping the needs of the State of Utah.
Sincerely,
/d!Nand
tl":,,;u
Meli
Mayor Stockton Town
Agenda Item
8(D)(v)(a)
Virgin Town
Presented to the Drinking Water Board
June 25,2024
DRINKING WATER BOARD
BOARD PACKET FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE
APPLICANT’S REQUEST:
On May 16,2023,the Drinking Water Board authorized a construction loan of
$3,070,489 with $930,489 in principal forgiveness,for a net repayable amount of
$2,140,000 for 40 years at 0%interest to Virgin Town to build a new 500,000-gallon
storage tank and install new distribution water lines throughout the water system.
Virgin Town has experienced significant delays with this project.As outlined in the
attached email from Mayor Krause;the Bureau of Land Management right-of-way that
was granted as part of this project required the access road to be in a specific location.
The amount of access granted was not wide enough and had to be re-designed.
This road still has not been built and the geotechnical engineer who is to design the water
tank still has limited access to the site.This has delayed the completion of the design
stage of the water tank.
Staff is working with the system to move this project forward by accessing the principal
forgiveness portion to fund the roadway access to the tank site.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Drinking Water Board authorize a one-year extension to Virgin Town.
Virgin Town
June 25,2024
Page 2
APPLICANT’S LOCATION:
Virgin Town is located in Washington County approximately 25 miles northeast of St.
George.
MAP OF APPLICANT’S LOCATION:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Virgin Town needs to build a new 500,000-gallon storage tank and connecting waterline
as well as upgrade existing water lines within Town boundaries.
Virgin Town
June 25,2024
Page 3
POPULATION GROWTH:
Year Population Connections
Current 707 293
2030 781 335
2040 812 345
COST ESTIMATE:
Legal/Bonding/Admin $20,000
Rights-of-Way $7,000
Financial Consultant $4,000
Environmental Clearances $2,000
Engineering –Design $150,000
Engineering –MS $75,000
Construction –Waterline $521,089
Construction –Storage Tank $1,950,000
Contingency (~10%)$741,400
1%Loan Origination Fee $31,015
Total $3,501,194
Total (w/o LOF)$3,470,489
COST ALLOCATION:
Funding Source Cost Sharing Percent of Project
DWB Loan (1.0%,40-yrs)$2,140,000 61.7%
DWB Subsidy $930,489 26.8%
Local Contribution $400,000 11.5%
Total $3,470,489 100%
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
DWB Funding Authorization:May 2023
Complete Design June 2023
DDW Plan Approval:July 2023
Advertise for Bids:Aug 2023
Bid Opening:Sep 2023
Loan Closing:Oct 2023
Begin Construction:Nov 2023
Complete Construction:Mar 2024
Virgin Town
June 25,2024
Page 4
IPS SUMMARY:
Code Description Physical
Facilities
Quality
&
Monitoring
Significant
Deficiency
Violations
M006 CCC-Lacks Written Records 15
Total =15
Virgin Town
June 25,2024
Page 5
CONTACT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT:Virgin Town
114 Mill Rd.
Virgin,UT 84779
Telephone:[phone]
Email:[e-mail]
PRESIDING OFFICIAL &
CONTACT PERSON:Jean Krause,Mayor
114 Mill Rd.
Virgin,UT 84779
Telephone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Email:[e-mail]
TREASURER/RECORDER:Krystal Percival
114 Mill Rd.
Virgin,UT 84779
Telephone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Email:[e-mail]
CONSULTING ENGINEER:Rod Mills
Galloway
2015 W.Grove Pkwy Ste H
Pleasant Grove,UT 84062
Telephone:[phone]
Email:[e-mail]
BOND ATTORNEY:
Allyson Spevak <[e-mail]>
Virgin Town SRF Project #3F1909
1 message
Jean Krause <[e-mail]>Thu, May 23, 2024 at 10:49 AM
To: Allyson Spevak <[e-mail]>
Cc: Boyd Preece <[e-mail]>
Hello Allyson,
This is in response to your email asking if Virgin needs an extension on our water tank project loan, and if so, provide an
explanation why.
Yes, Virgin would like an extension on this loan. Here are the reasons why this got delayed:
1. The BLM right-of-way that was granted as part of this project required the access road to be in a specific location.
The amount of access granted was not wide enough and had to be re-designed. This caused a 6-month delay.
2. This road still has not been built and the geotechnical engineer who is to design the water tank still has limited
access to the site. This has delayed the completion of the design stage of the water tank.
Virgin is asking if we can do the road construction out of order so that we can complete this project.
This has delayed the project significantly and therefore we are asking for an extension on this loan and project.
In the meantime, attached is the resolution raising our water rates to cover the loan payment, repairs, the capital facilities
replacement reserve account. The increased fees began in January of this year, so we are already collecting these fees
and will b able to make the first payment on this loan as scheduled.
Jean M. Krause
Mayor
Virgin Town
114 S Mill Street | Virgin, UT 84779
435.680.6823 | [e-mail]
Resolution R2023-J, Water Rate Increase.pdf
107K
5/28/24, 8:06 AM State of Utah Mail - Virgin Town SRF Project #3F1909
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c575030d0d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1799862846522080317%7Cmsg-f:1799862846522080317…1/1