DDW-2025-001177

Google Drive Workflow Checklist:
Draft Letter:
Make a COPY of the template you want to use.
Rename it with your First Initial, Last Name, System # & File # (MNewberry 125033 12323 Approval)
Move it to the Google Drive Workflow Folder: Letters - Creators/Sections.
Draft Letter
Section Review: (Add rows & adjust names as needed ). Assign collaborators (comment, @email & assign).
Reviewer
Status
Date Notified
MM/DD/YY
Date Completed
MM/DD/YY
Notes
Source Protection Staff
Date
Date
Water Quality Monitoring & Standards
Date
Date
Infrastructure Funding
Date
Date
Compliance & Operator Assistance
Date
Date
Field Services
Date
Date
Manager Review: Move letter to MNewberry Review - Assign
Reviewer
Status
Date Notified
MM/DD/YY
Date Completed
MM/DD/YY
Notes
MNewberry
Date
Jan 28, 2025
Assistant Director Review: Move letter to RSeeley Review - Assign
Reviewer
Status
Date Notified
MM/DD/YY
Date Completed
MM/DD/YY
Notes
RSeeley
Date
Date
Director Review: Move letter to NLunstad Review - Assign to Jessica, she will assign to Nathan
Reviewer
Status
Date Notified
MM/DD/YY
Date Completed
MM/DD/YY
Notes
Jessica Fitzgerald

Date
Date
Nathan Lunstad
Date
Date
Support Staff Review & Final: Move letter to MBooth Final/Email/Mail - Assign
Reviewer
Status
Date Notified
MM/DD/YY
Date Completed
MM/DD/YY
Notes
Marianne Booth
Jan 28, 2025
Date
Plan Approval Template — Basic (Updated 1/10/2024)
PA template with Permitting A Workflow (with Eng Manager signature):
Staff (review engineer) → Eng Manager → Clerical
Before forwarding this workflow for manager review, check off the steps you’ve completed, add notes (e.g., “not applicable”), and initial in the box below.
1.Use this PA template for water line, tank, pump stationand treatment (e.g. fluoride).
PA with exception to rules unrelated to minimum separation – Use the Exception Others (&PA) (B) workflow instead.
PA for a chlorinator treating GW for primary disinfection – Use the PA GW Primary Disinfection template instead.
PA for a chlorinator treating GW for secondary disinfection– Use the PA GW Secondary Disinfection template instead.
PA for a well or spring – Use the PA Well or PA Spring workflows instead.
PA for surface water WTP – Use the PA WTP Surface Water workflow instead.
PA for inorganics or other WTP – Use the PA WTP Others workflow instead.
2.Waterlink – Add the following for this letter:
Submittal (SUBMITTAL TYPE “Plans and Specs”; or SUBMITTAL TYPE “Revision/Revised” – SUBMITTAL DETAILS “plans and specs”)
Response (RESPONSE TYPE “Plan Approval”)
Response date[The Permitting Env. Program Coordinator will update the response date if the official date of this letter differs from your entry.]
3.Exceptions in Waterlink – If this letter includes granting an exception:
Enter this exception in the Exception Tracking module.
Add a plan submittal entry in the Plan Review module to document exception request and response.
4.SDWIS – Update facility status (proposed); facility info (e.g., tank type/material/volumes, treatment capacity/process/unit/analyte).
5.SDWIS – If this project involves treatment,MCL compliance, or activation of a PWS:
Inform the Monitoring and Complicance Sectionsof the proposed project and this PA draft (and save the documentation).
Coordinate with rule manager(s) on customized monitoring language and sampling points. For example, for RTCR; for disinfection; for lead and copper in case of changes in sources or treatment;
for nitrate, iron, manganese, etc.
Identify specific rule manager(s) that you worked with here: _____
Include specific rule manager(s) in the cc list of this letter.
6.IPS – If this letter affects a water system’s deficiency in the IPS database:
Notify Deficiency Coordinator of the Monitoring and Compliance Sections of the PA draft (and save the documentation).
Include the IPS paragraph in this letter.
Include the Monitoring and Compliance Sections staff/manager in the cc list of this letter.
7.If this is a Conditional PA with conditions that need to be tracked in SDWIS or IPS:
SDWIS (if applicable) – Work with rule manager(s) to update monitoring schedule and sampling points. For example, for RTCR; for disinfection; for lead and copper in case of changes in
sources or treatment; for nitrate, iron, manganese, etc. Identify specific rule manager(s) that you worked with here: _____
IPS (if applicable) – Work with Deficiency Coordinator to add an appropriate IPS deficiency tracking CPA conditions and due dates.
8.D2 – Save the submittal & response documents related to this letter.
9SRF – If project is funded by the State or Federal State Revolving Fund:
Confirm funding and project manager in the Loan Tracker (WaterLink)
Send contract docs/specs to the SRF project manager for review and verification of special conditions.
ADD SRF paragraphs to the letter (request from SRF project manager)
Include SRF project manager in the cc list of this letter.
Support Staff: Delete This Page Before Mailing
Jan 27, 2025
Jamie Grandpre
Tooele City
90 North Main Street

Tooele City, Utah 84074
Subject:Plan Approval, 3100 North and SR-36 Backbone Water Line - Phase 3 (DS001);
Tooele City, System #23004, File #18950
Dear Jamie Grandpre:The Division of Drinking Water (the Division) received the plans and specifications for the 3100 North and SR-36 Backbone Water Line - Phase 3 from you on January
21, 2025. This project has met the conditions for receiving a plan approval.
Our understanding of the project includes the following:
This project is Phase 3 for the 3100 North to 2400 North segment of the Perry Commercial Development water line improvements for future development near the northern boundary of Tooele
City between SR-36 and 400 West. Tooele City previously filed for and received Plan Approval for the 3100 North Compass Point project (System #23004, File #15419), dated July 9, 2024
and 3100 North and SR-36 Backbone Water Line Phase 2 project (System #23004, File #15888), dated August 1, 2024. The Phase 3 project will allow Tooele City to complete the loop between
2400 North and 3100 North.
This project includes the installation of approximately one blow off, ten fire hydrants, and 7,100 feet of 16-inch diameter C900 PVC, and other appurtenances.
All phases of this overall project are included in the hydraulic analysis completed by Hansen Allen & Luce (HA&L). The water modeling study prepared by HA&L shows a requirement to install
14-inch diameter water lines extending from 2400 North along SR-36 North, to the 3100 North roadway.
A hydraulic modeling analysis certification stamped and signed by Katie Gibson Jacobsen, P.E., dated May 29, 2024, was received for this project.
The water line and related appurtenances will be installed in accordance with the Approved Water Line Standards.
The 3100 North and SR-36 Backbone Water Line - Phase 3 is identified as DS001 in the Division’s database.
We have completed our review of the plans and specifications, stamped and signed by Benjamin B. Duzett,P.E., dated January 8, 2025,and find they basically comply with the applicable
portions of Utah’s Administrative Rules for Public Drinking Water Systems in R309. On this basis, the plans for 3100 North and SR-36 Backbone Water Line - Phase 3 are hereby approved.
This approval pertains to construction only. An Operating Permit must be obtained from the Director before 3100 North and SR-36 Backbone Water Line - Phase 3 may be put in service. A
checklist outlining the items required for operating permit issuance is enclosed for your information.Approvals or permits from the local authority or the county may be necessary before
beginning construction of this project. As the project proceeds, notice of any changes in the approved design, as well as any change affecting the quantity or quality of the delivered
water, must be submitted to the Division. We may also conduct interim and final inspections of this project. Please notify us when actual construction begins so that these inspections
can be scheduled.
This approval must be renewed if construction has not begun or if substantial equipment has not been ordered within one year of the date of this letter.
If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Chris Martin, P.E., of this office, at [phone], or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael Newberry, P.E.
Permitting and Engineering Support Manager
CMM/mrn/Admin (processing & mailing) [Initials]Enclosures –Operating Permit Checklistcc:Bryan Slade, Tooele County Health Department, [e-mail] Romney, Focus Engineering
and Surveying, [e-mail] Grandpre, Tooele City, [e-mail] Hansen, Tooele City, [e-mail] Martin, P.E., Division of Drinking Water, [e-mail]
Arns, Division of Drinking Water, [e-mail] - Basic [Right click. Select “Update Field” to update file name]
Utah Division of Drinking Water ― Checklist for Issuing Operating PermitsWater System Name:System Number: Project Description:File Number:
Items 1 through 8 below must be submitted to the Division and found to be acceptable prior to operating permit issuance (unless a water line project meets the requirements of R309-500-7
and is not required to obtain an Operating Permit).
Distribution lines (not including in-line booster pump stations) requiring Plan Approval may be placed into service prior to submitting all of the following items and receipt of Operating
Permit if the water system has received items 1 and 4 below.☐1.Certification of Rule Conformance by a professional engineer (P.E.) that all conditions of Plan Approval were accomplished,
and if applicable, changes made during construction were in conformance with rules R309-500 through 550☐2.As-built or record drawings incorporating all changes to approved plans and
specifications (unless no changes were made to the previously approved plans during construction)☐3.Confirmation that as-built or record drawings have been received by the water system☐4.Satisfactory
bacteriological samples as evidence of proper disinfection and flushing in accordance with the appropriate ANSI/AWWA standards:
☐ANSI/AWWA C651-14 AWWA Standard for Disinfecting Water MainsTwo consecutive sample sets at least 16 hours apart, none positive (e.g., every 1,200 feet, end-of-line, each branch)☐ANSI/AWWA
C652-11 AWWA Standard for Disinfection of Water-Storage FacilitiesOne or more samples, none positive☐ANSI/AWWA C653-13 AWWA Standard for Disinfection of Water Treatment PlantsTwo consecutive
samples per unit, none positive, no less than 30 minutes apart☐ANSI/AWWA C654-13 AWWA Standard for Disinfection of WellsTwo consecutive samples, none positive, no less than 30 minutes
apart☐5.Water quality data, where appropriate [For example, include raw and finished water data that demonstrate satisfactory performance of the treatment facility; sample should be
taken from a storage tank for residual volatile organic compounds after tank interior re-coating; etc.]☐6.If applicable, all other documentation that may have been required during the
plan review process☐7.If applicable, confirmation that the water system owner has received the O&M manual for the new facility☐8.If applicable, location data of new storage tank, treatment
facility, or source