DAQ-2025-001077

1

DAQC-176-25
Site ID 10919 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INCORPORATED –
Ogden Plant – Weber County

THROUGH: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Oil and Gas Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Kyle Greenberg, Environmental Scientist

DATE: February 13, 2025

SUBJECT: Sources: Forming Baghouses #1, #2, #3, and #4, Reclaim Baghouse #6, and
Collector Baghouses #5 and #8
Location: Weber County, UT
Contact: Mike Jones: 801-786-2318
Tester: TETCO
Site ID #: 10919
Permit/AO #: DAQE-AN109190023-23, dated October 27, 2023
Subject: Review of Stack Test Report dated October 10, 2024

On October 31, 2024, the DAQ received a test report for Forming Baghouses #1, #2, #3, and #4, Reclaim
Baghouse #6, and Collector Baghouses #5 and #8 at the Kimberly-Clark Ogden Plant in Weber County,
UT. Testing was performed September 30, 2024, through October 3, 2024, to demonstrate compliance
with the emission limits found in condition II.B.2 of the Approval Order DAQE-AN109190023-23. The
DAQ-calculated test results are:

Source Test Date Test
Methods Pollutants Tester Results DAQ Results Limits
Baghouse
#1
Oct. 1,
2024 M5 Total PM 0.0010 gr/dscf
0.13 lb/hr
0.0010 gr/dscf
0.1267 lb/hr
0.01 gr/dscf
1.63 lb/hr
Baghouse
#2
Oct. 1-2,
2024 M5 Total PM 0.0005 gr/dscf
0.06 lb/hr
0.0005 gr/dscf
0.0629 lb/hr
0.01 gr/dscf
1.63 lb/hr
Baghouse
#3
Sept. 30,
2024 M5 Total PM 0.0010 gr/dscf
0.12 lb/hr
0.0010 gr/dscf
0.1194 lb/hr
0.01 gr/dscf
1.83 lb/hr
Baghouse
#4
Sept. 30,
2024 M5 Total PM 0.0007 gr/dscf
0.11 lb/hr
0.0007 gr/dscf
0.1123 lb/hr
0.01 gr/dscf
2.39 lb/hr
Baghouse
#5
Oct. 1,
2024 M5 Total PM 0.0006 gr/dscf
0.03 lb/hr
0.0006 gr/dscf
0.0339 lb/hr
0.01 gr/dscf
1.63 lb/hr

4 ' - ) - "
2

Source Test Date Test
Methods Pollutants Tester Results DAQ Results Limits
Baghouse
#6
Oct. 2,
2024 M5 Total PM 0.0007 gr/dscf
0.12 lb/hr
0.0007 gr/dscf
0.1175 lb/hr
0.01 gr/dscf
1.85 lb/hr
Baghouse
#8
Oct. 2-3,
2024 M5 Total PM 0.0003 gr/dscf
0.01 lb/hr
0.0003 gr/dscf
0.0133 lb/hr
0.01 gr/dscf
1.63 lb/hr

DEVIATIONS: None.

CONCLUSION: The stack tests appear to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: The emissions from Baghouses #1 – #6, and #8 should be
considered to have been in compliance with the emission limits
of the AO during the time of testing.

HPV: None.

ATTACHMENTS: Kimberly-Clark Stack Test Reports; DAQ excel worksheets
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919
County Weber County
Unit ID Baghouse # 1
Test Date 10/1/2024
EPA Methods 5 & 202: Determination of Particulate and Condensible Particulate Emissions
from Stationary Sources
Run # 1 2 3 Average
date 10/1/2024 10/1/2024 10/1/2024
start time 8:07 10:10 12:33
stop time 9:11 11:44 13:35
sampling time (minutes) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0
DS stack diameter (inches) 36.000 36.000 36.000 36.00
PAVG average (delta P)½ (" H2O)½0.6668 0.6309 0.6779 0.6585
CP pitot tube constant (unitless) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84
TS stack temp. (°F) 98.8 101.8 105.4 102.0
Pbar barometric pressure (" Hg) 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90
Ps stack pressure (" H2O)-0.18 -0.18 -0.18 -0.18
Yd meter box Yd (unitless)1.0140 1.0140 1.0140 1.014
Tm meter temp. (°F) 53.80 73.00 81.20 69.33
Vm sample volume (ft3)48.473 46.655 50.344 48.491
H orifice setting delta H (" H2O)1.63 1.50 1.75 1.6
Vlc moisture (g) 6.80 5.4 4.5 5.6
O2%vd oxygen (%vd) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2%vd carbon dioxide (%vd) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
DN nozzle diameter (inches) 0.2545 0.2545 0.2545 0.2545
Run # 1 2 3 Average
grams mass particulate front half (g) 0.00290 0.00260 0.00370 0.00307
grams mass particulate filter (g) 0.00020 -0.00010 -0.00060 -0.00017
Run # 1 2 3 Average
Vmstd sample volume (dscf) 43.898 40.715 43.299 42.637
sample volume (dscm) 1.243 1.153 1.226 1.207
Vwstd moisture volume (dscf) 0.321 0.255 0.212 0.263
Bws measured moisture content (%/100) 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.006
saturated moisture content (%/100) 0.072 0.079 0.088 0.080
actual moisture content (%/100) 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.006
MD molecular weight (dry) 28.84 28.8360 28.84 28.84
MA molecular weight (actual) 28.76 28.77 28.78 28.77
VS gas velocity (ft/sec) 41.5 39.3 42.4 41.1
FACFM gas flow (acfm) 17,590 16,684 17,980 17,418
FDSCFM gas flow (dscfm) 14,283 13,490 14,464 14,079
lb/hr gas flow (lb/hr) 64,381 60,763 65,098 63,414
% % isokinetic 102.6 100.8 99.9 101.1 Permit
Limits
lb/hr F½ PM (lb/hr) 0.1334 0.1096 0.1370 0.1267
gr/dscf F½ PM (gr/dscf) 0.0011 0.0009 0.0011 0.0010
lb/hr Total PM (lb/hr) 0.1334 0.1096 0.1370 0.1267 1.63
gr/dscf Total PM (gr/dscf) 0.0011 0.0009 0.0011 0.0010 0.01
Field Reference Method Data
Laboratory Data
Reference Method Calculations
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919CountyWeber County
Unit ID Baghouse # 1
Test Date 10/1/2024
Run 1 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 679.103 0.32 0.5657 1.15 94 37 38 102.52
2 2.5 680.77 0.3 0.5477 1.08 94 38 38 106.27
3 2.5 682.445 0.37 0.6083 1.33 95 37 39 114.15
4 2.5 684.44 0.41 0.6403 1.47 96 39 41 93.2452.5 686.16 0.41 0.6403 1.47 97 0.9 44 110.22
6 2.5 688.12 0.49 0.7000 1.76 97 40 45 105.77
7 2.5 690.26 0.59 0.7681 2.11 97 40 48 104.29
8 2.5 692.58 0.65 0.8062 2.33 100 42 51 103.90
9 2.5 695.01 0.67 0.8185 2.4 100 43 56 104.69102.5 697.51 0.56 0.7483 2.01 100 44 59 95.25
11 2.5 699.6 0.46 0.6782 1.65 100 46 62 101.47
12 2.5 701.63 0.38 0.6164 1.36 101 47 63 102.71
13 2.5 703.501 0.25 0.5000 0.9985060105.43
14 2.5 705.065 0.26 0.5099 0.93 98 50 60 106.10152.5 706.67 0.29 0.5385 1.04 98 53 63 107.07
16 2.5 708.39 0.42 0.6481 1.51 100 53 63 101.70
17 2.5 710.35 0.45 0.6708 1.61 100 54 67 103.05
18 2.5 712.415 0.53 0.7280 1.9 100 54 67 104.01
19 2.5 714.675 0.59 0.7681 2.11 101 55 70 111.18202.5 717.23 0.68 0.8246 2.44 100 58 72 89.96
21 2.5 719.46 0.6 0.7746 2.15 100 58 75 100.98
22 2.5 721.82 0.46 0.6782 1.65 102 63 78 98.01
23 2.5 723.84 0.38 0.6164 1.36 101 62 78 105.08
24 2.5 725.81 0.37 0.6083 1.33 103 63 79 92.74
727.526
Run 2 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 728.122 0.24 0.4899 0.89 101 69 68 101.95
2 2.5 729.64 0.24 0.4899 0.89 101 69 68 101.95
3 2.5 731.19 0.26 0.5099 0.96 101 70 68 99.9442.5 732.76 0.29 0.5385 1.07 102 69 68 96.06
5 2.5 734.41 0.3 0.5477 1.11 102 70 70 98.99
6 2.5 736.1 0.34 0.5831 1.26 102 71 70 95.19
7 2.5 737.97 0.46 0.6782 1.7 101 70 71 90.58
8 2.5 740.06 0.54 0.7348 1.99 103 71 71 93.6092.5 742.32 0.56 0.7483 2.07 101 71 74 98.95
10 2.5 744.575 0.45 0.6708 1.66 101 72 74 109.91
11 2.5 746.645 0.44 0.6633 1.67 100 72 75 101.85
12 2.5 748.68 0.46 0.6782 1.7 101 73 70 98.39
13 2.5 750.754 0.24 0.4899 0.89 100 73 72 138.13142.5 752.31 0.25 0.5000 0.92 103 73 72 101.81
15 2.5 753.91 0.3 0.5477 1.11 103 74 73 95.44
16 2.5 755.685 0.42 0.6481 1.55 103 74 73 89.60
17 2.5 757.74 0.48 0.6928 1.77 102 75 75 96.74
18 2.5 759.89 0.59 0.7681 2.18 103 75 75 91.47192.5 762.27 0.55 0.7416 2.03 103 74 77 104.73
20 2.5 764.45 0.54 0.7348 1.99 102 75 77 96.63
21 2.5 766.68 0.54 0.7348 1.99 101 76 80 98.39
22 2.5 768.865 0.45 0.6708 1.66 103 76 79 105.79
23 2.5 770.88 0.41 0.6403 1.51 102 76 80 101.98242.5 772.86 0.41 0.6403 1.51 103 76 80 100.30
774.777
Run 3 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 775.6 0.32 0.5657 1.19 102 77 77 92.22
2 2.5 777.21 0.33 0.5745 1.23 103 77 77 99.0932.5 778.965 0.34 0.5831 1.27 102 78 76 99.77
4 2.5 780.76 0.39 0.6245 1.45 103 78 77 103.84
5 2.5 782.76 0.38 0.6164 1.42 103 78 79 102.37
6 2.5 784.71 0.49 0.7000 1.71 104 78 80 97.39
7 2.5 786.815 0.66 0.8124 2.46 104 79 81 100.0982.5 789.325 0.73 0.8544 2.72 106 78 83 102.35
9 2.5 792.02 0.77 0.8775 2.86 106 79 84 97.48
10 2.5 794.66 0.6 0.7746 2.24 106 80 85 98.36
11 2.5 797.02 0.41 0.6403 1.53 107 80 86 100.13
12 2.5 799.01 0.4 0.6325 1.49 105 80 86 104.74132.5 801.07 0.25 0.5000 0.93 106 80 81 93.95
14 2.5 802.525 0.24 0.4899 0.89 108 80 82 103.21
15 2.5 804.09 0.32 0.5657 1.19 107 80 82 106.22
16 2.5 805.95 0.48 0.6928 1.79 107 80 84 98.84
17 2.5 808.07 0.51 0.7141 1.9 107 80 84 101.57182.5 810.315 0.62 0.7874 2.31 108 80 84 98.89
19 2.5 812.72 0.58 0.7616 2.16 107 81 85 100.86
20 2.5 815.1 0.62 0.7874 2.31 105 81 85 99.27
21 2.5 817.525 0.55 0.7416 2.05 106 81 86 98.36
22 2.5 819.79 0.48 0.6928 1.79 106 81 87 99.32232.5 821.93 0.41 0.6403 1.53 106 82 88 102.18
24 2.5 823.97 0.41 0.6403 1.53 106 82 88 98.87
825.944
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919
County Weber County
Unit ID Baghouse # 2
Test Date 10/1/2024 - 10/2/2024
EPA Methods 5 & 202: Determination of Particulate and Condensible Particulate Emissions
from Stationary Sources
Run # 1 2 3 Average
date 10/1/2024 10/2/2024 10/2/2024
start time 15:03 8:19 12:32
stop time 16:05 11:56 14:14
sampling time (minutes) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0
DS stack diameter (inches) 36.000 36.000 36.000 36.00
PAVG average (delta P)½ (" H2O)½0.7229 0.6989 0.7165 0.7128
CP pitot tube constant (unitless) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84
TS stack temp. (°F) 101.1 104.4 105.7 103.7
Pbar barometric pressure (" Hg) 25.90 25.70 25.70 25.77
Ps stack pressure (" H2O)-0.22 -0.22 -0.22 -0.22
Yd meter box Yd (unitless)1.0140 1.0140 1.0140 1.014
Tm meter temp. (°F) 78.80 69.80 79.70 76.10
Vm sample volume (ft3)54.106 40.240 53.724 49.357
H orifice setting delta H (" H2O)2.03 1.07 1.95 1.7
Vlc moisture (g) 6.50 2.9 4.8 4.7
O2%vd oxygen (%vd) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2%vd carbon dioxide (%vd) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
DN nozzle diameter (inches) 0.2545 0.2220 0.2545 0.2437
Run # 1 2 3 Average
grams mass particulate front half (g) 0.00240 0.00140 0.00150 0.00177
grams mass particulate filter (g) -0.00040 -0.00030 -0.00060 -0.00043
Run # 1 2 3 Average
Vmstd sample volume (dscf) 46.779 35.014 46.004 42.599
sample volume (dscm) 1.325 0.991 1.303 1.206
Vwstd moisture volume (dscf) 0.307 0.137 0.226 0.223
Bws measured moisture content (%/100) 0.007 0.004 0.005 0.005
saturated moisture content (%/100) 0.077 0.086 0.089 0.084
actual moisture content (%/100) 0.007 0.004 0.005 0.005
MD molecular weight (dry) 28.84 28.8360 28.84 28.84
MA molecular weight (actual) 28.77 28.79 28.78 28.78
VS gas velocity (ft/sec) 45.1 43.8 45.0 44.6
FACFM gas flow (acfm) 19,107 18,590 19,084 18,927
FDSCFM gas flow (dscfm) 15,462 14,879 15,224 15,188
lb/hr gas flow (lb/hr) 69,660 66,923 68,516 68,366
% % isokinetic 101.0 103.3 100.9 101.7 Permit
Limits
lb/hr F½ PM (lb/hr) 0.0875 0.0618 0.0394 0.0629
gr/dscf F½ PM (gr/dscf) 0.0007 0.0005 0.0003 0.0005
lb/hr Total PM (lb/hr) 0.0875 0.0618 0.0394 0.0629 1.63
gr/dscf Total PM (gr/dscf) 0.0007 0.0005 0.0003 0.0005 0.01
Field Reference Method Data
Laboratory Data
Reference Method Calculations
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919CountyWeber County
Unit ID Baghouse #Baghouse # 2
Test Date 10/1/2024 - 10/2/2024
Run 1 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
82.811 Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 826.704 0.28 0.5292 1.04 101 75 75 101.18
2 2.5 828.35 0.25 0.5000 0.93 101 73 74 101.74
3 2.5 829.91 0.26 0.5099 0.97 101 73 75 102.55
4 2.5 831.515 0.26 0.5099 0.97 101 73 75 104.4752.5 833.15 0.34 0.5831 1.27 101 73 76 105.04
6 2.5 835.03 0.46 0.6782 1.71 101 74 77 100.81
7 2.5 837.13 0.48 0.6928 1.79 101 74 78 105.19
8 2.5 839.37 0.36 0.6000 1.34 102 76 80 96.12
9 2.5 841.15 0.38 0.6164 1.42 104 77 81 104.09102.5 843.13 0.47 0.6856 1.75 104 75 81 101.44
11 2.5 845.27 0.51 0.7141 1.9 104 76 83 100.78
12 2.5 847.49 0.5 0.7071 1.86 102 76 84 100.31
13 2.5 849.684 0.44 0.6633 1.64 100 77 81 100.15
14 2.5 851.74 0.44 0.6633 1.64 99 77 81 101.96152.5 853.835 0.66 0.8124 2.46 99 75 82 107.84
16 2.5 856.54 0.95 0.9747 3.54 100 76 84 96.81
17 2.5 859.45 0.88 0.9381 3.28 101 76 87 92.74
18 2.5 862.14 0.66 0.8124 2.48 100 75 87 97.31
19 2.5 864.59 0.52 0.7211 1.94 101 75 88 104.10202.5 866.92 0.67 0.8185 2.5997487100.93
21 2.5 869.48 0.73 0.8544 2.72 101 74 87 101.47
22 2.5 872.16 0.82 0.9055 3.06 101 76 88 101.27
23 2.5 875 0.88 0.9381 3.28 102 77 90 99.70
24 2.5 877.9 0.85 0.9220 3.17 101 77 91 101.57
880.81
Run 2 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%129.714 Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 881.757 0.41 0.6403 0.85 97 47 50 101.03
2 2.5 883.21 0.42 0.6481 0.87 97 45 50 100.03
3 2.5 884.581 0.28 0.5292 0.59 97 45 51 115.3942.5 886.031 0.29 0.5385 0.61 102 60 61 117.56
5 2.5 887.15 0.35 0.5916 0.75 105 66 68 81.82
6 2.5 888.65 0.53 0.7280 1.14 104 67 69 88.97
7 2.5 890.36 0.51 0.7141 1.1 104 68 70 103.19
8 2.5 892.06 0.38 0.6164 0.82 105 68 70 118.8692.5 893.56 0.41 0.6403 0.88 105 69 73 100.60
10 2.5 895.13 0.48 0.6928 1.03 105 67 73 97.54
11 2.5 896.795 0.53 0.7280 1.14 105 68 74 98.29
12 2.5 898.61 0.53 0.7280 1.14 105 68 75 107.04
13 2.5 900.25 0.34 0.5831 0.73 107 69 76 120.61142.5 901.81 0.36 0.6000 0.77 107 70 76 111.40
15 2.5 903.04 0.48 0.6928 1.03 107 70 77 76.05
16 2.5 905.05 0.63 0.7937 1.35 106 70 78 108.38
17 2.5 906.94 0.76 0.8718 1.63 107 70 82 92.60
18 2.5 908.88 0.5 0.7071 1.07 108 70 82 117.10192.5 910.58 0.5 0.7071 1.07 107 70 84 102.33
20 2.5 912.55 0.58 0.7616 1.26 104 70 84 109.87
21 2.5 914.125 0.61 0.7810 1.32 104 70 86 85.51
22 2.5 916.03 0.64 0.8000 1.39 105 71 87 100.89
23 2.5 917.86 0.69 0.8307 1.5 106 71 87 93.45242.5 919.825 0.72 0.8485 1.56 106 71 87 98.25
25 921.815
Run 3 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
177.458 Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 922.524 0.26 0.5099 0.96 104 75 76 101.44
2 2.5 924.12 0.26 0.5099 0.96 103 75 76 103.1932.5 925.745 0.31 0.5568 1.14 103 75 77 99.11
4 2.5 927.45 0.28 0.5292 1.03 104 73 78 103.83
5 2.5 929.145 0.33 0.5745 1.22 103 73 79 106.23
6 2.5 931.03 0.54 0.7348 1.99 103 73 80 92.85
7 2.5 933.135 0.68 0.8246 2.51 103 72 81 117.1182.5 936.11 0.48 0.6928 1.77 104 75 76 82.99
9 2.5 937.88 0.43 0.6557 1.59 106 76 78 103.37
10 2.5 939.97 0.52 0.7211 1.92 106 76 80 101.55
11 2.5 942.23 0.61 0.7810 2.25 106 76 79 101.83
12 2.5 944.68 0.62 0.7874 2.28 105 76 83 100.39132.5 947.126 0.42 0.6481 1.55 109 79 83 100.30
14 2.5 949.14 0.41 0.6403 1.51 108 78 84 100.46
15 2.5 951.135 0.57 0.7550 2.1 107 79 85 103.67
16 2.5 953.565 0.77 0.8775 2.84 107 78 84 97.47
17 2.5 956.21 0.77 0.8775 2.84 108 78 87 101.51182.5 958.97 0.55 0.7416 2.03 108 79 89 102.19
19 2.5 961.33 0.46 0.6782 1.7 108 78 88 93.83
20 2.5 963.31 0.54 0.7348 1.99 106 78 87 103.66
21 2.5 965.68 0.6 0.7746 2.21 106 78 88 101.83
22 2.5 968.135 0.66 0.8124 2.94 106 79 88 103.54232.5 970.75 0.79 0.8888 2.92 106 79 91 104.66
24 2.5 973.65 0.78 0.8832 2.92 107 79 91 94.44
25 976.248
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919
County Weber County
Unit ID Baghouse # 3
Test Date 9/30/2024
EPA Methods 5 & 202: Determination of Particulate and Condensible Particulate Emissions
from Stationary Sources
Run # 1 2 3 Average
date 9/30/2024 9/30/2024 9/30/2024
start time 12:27 14:10 15:33
stop time 13:28 15:13 16:35
sampling time (minutes) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0
DS stack diameter (inches) 36.000 36.000 36.000 36.00
PAVG average (delta P)½ (" H2O)½0.6477 0.6423 0.6661 0.6520
CP pitot tube constant (unitless) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84
TS stack temp. (°F) 97.0 101.5 97.9 98.8
Pbar barometric pressure (" Hg) 25.85 25.85 25.85 25.85
Ps stack pressure (" H2O)-0.14 -0.14 -0.14 -0.14
Yd meter box Yd (unitless)1.0140 1.0140 1.0140 1.014
Tm meter temp. (°F) 72.50 74.50 81.10 76.03
Vm sample volume (ft3)47.491 47.242 49.852 48.195
H orifice setting delta H (" H2O)1.62 1.61 1.72 1.6
Vlc moisture (g) 5.80 7.1 6.0 6.3
O2%vd oxygen (%vd) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2%vd carbon dioxide (%vd) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
DN nozzle diameter (inches) 0.2545 0.2545 0.2545 0.2545
Run # 1 2 3 Average
grams mass particulate front half (g) 0.00280 0.00500 0.00660 0.00480
grams mass particulate filter (g) 0.00010 -0.00090 -0.00550 -0.00210
Run # 1 2 3 Average
Vmstd sample volume (dscf) 41.417 41.045 42.797 41.753
sample volume (dscm) 1.173 1.162 1.212 1.182
Vwstd moisture volume (dscf) 0.274 0.335 0.283 0.297
Bws measured moisture content (%/100) 0.007 0.008 0.007 0.007
saturated moisture content (%/100) 0.068 0.078 0.070 0.072
actual moisture content (%/100) 0.007 0.008 0.007 0.007
MD molecular weight (dry) 28.84 28.8360 28.84 28.84
MA molecular weight (actual) 28.77 28.75 28.76 28.76
VS gas velocity (ft/sec) 40.3 40.1 41.4 40.6
FACFM gas flow (acfm) 17,072 17,002 17,571 17,215
FDSCFM gas flow (dscfm) 13,892 13,704 14,275 13,957
lb/hr gas flow (lb/hr) 62,589 61,800 64,315 62,901
% % isokinetic 99.5 100.0 100.1 99.9 Permit
Limits
lb/hr F½ PM (lb/hr) 0.1287 0.1811 0.0485 0.1194
gr/dscf F½ PM (gr/dscf) 0.0011 0.0015 0.0004 0.0010
lb/hr Total PM (lb/hr) 0.1287 0.1811 0.0485 0.1194 1.83
gr/dscf Total PM (gr/dscf) 0.0011 0.0015 0.0004 0.0010 0.01
Field Reference Method Data
Laboratory Data
Reference Method Calculations
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919
County Weber County
Unit ID Baghouse # 3Test Date 9/30/2024
Run 1 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 826.704 0.28 0.5292 1.04 101 75 75 101.18
2 2.5 828.35 0.25 0.5000 0.93 101 73 74 101.74
3 2.5 829.91 0.26 0.5099 0.97 101 73 75 102.55
4 2.5 831.515 0.26 0.5099 0.97 101 73 75 104.47
5 2.5 833.15 0.34 0.5831 1.27 101 73 76 105.04
6 2.5 835.03 0.46 0.6782 1.71 101 74 77 100.81
7 2.5 837.13 0.48 0.6928 1.79 101 74 78 105.19
8 2.5 839.37 0.36 0.6000 1.34 102 76 80 96.12
9 2.5 841.15 0.38 0.6164 1.42 104 77 81 104.09
10 2.5 843.13 0.47 0.6856 1.75 104 75 81 101.44
11 2.5 845.27 0.51 0.7141 1.9 104 76 83 100.78
12 2.5 847.49 0.5 0.7071 1.86 102 76 84 100.31
13 2.5 849.684 0.44 0.6633 1.64 100 77 81 100.15
14 2.5 851.74 0.44 0.6633 1.64 99 77 81 101.96
15 2.5 853.835 0.66 0.8124 2.46 99 75 82 107.84
16 2.5 856.54 0.95 0.9747 3.54 100 76 84 96.81
17 2.5 859.45 0.88 0.9381 3.28 101 76 87 92.74
18 2.5 862.14 0.66 0.8124 2.48 100 75 87 97.31
19 2.5 864.59 0.52 0.7211 1.94 101 75 88 104.10
20 2.5 866.92 0.67 0.8185 2.5 99 74 87 100.93
21 2.5 869.48 0.73 0.8544 2.72 101 74 87 101.47
22 2.5 872.16 0.82 0.9055 3.06 101 76 88 101.27
23 2.5 875 0.88 0.9381 3.28 102 77 90 99.70
24 2.5 877.9 0.85 0.9220 3.17 101 77 91 101.57
880.81
Run 2 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 881.757 0.41 0.6403 0.85 97 47 50 101.03
2 2.5 883.21 0.42 0.6481 0.87 97 45 50 100.03
3 2.5 884.581 0.28 0.5292 0.59 97 45 51 115.39
4 2.5 886.031 0.29 0.5385 0.61 102 60 61 117.56
5 2.5 887.15 0.35 0.5916 0.75 105 66 68 81.82
6 2.5 888.65 0.53 0.7280 1.14 104 67 69 88.97
7 2.5 890.36 0.51 0.7141 1.1 104 68 70 103.19
8 2.5 892.06 0.38 0.6164 0.82 105 68 70 118.86
9 2.5 893.56 0.41 0.6403 0.88 105 69 73 100.60
10 2.5 895.13 0.48 0.6928 1.03 105 67 73 97.54
11 2.5 896.795 0.53 0.7280 1.14 105 68 74 98.29
12 2.5 898.61 0.53 0.7280 1.14 105 68 75 107.04
13 2.5 900.25 0.34 0.5831 0.73 107 69 76 120.61
14 2.5 901.81 0.36 0.6000 0.77 107 70 76 111.40
15 2.5 903.04 0.48 0.6928 1.03 107 70 77 76.05
16 2.5 905.05 0.63 0.7937 1.35 106 70 78 108.38
17 2.5 906.94 0.76 0.8718 1.63 107 70 82 92.60
18 2.5 908.88 0.5 0.7071 1.07 108 70 82 117.10
19 2.5 910.58 0.5 0.7071 1.07 107 70 84 102.33
20 2.5 912.55 0.58 0.7616 1.26 104 70 84 109.87
21 2.5 914.125 0.61 0.7810 1.32 104 70 86 85.51
22 2.5 916.03 0.64 0.8000 1.39 105 71 87 100.89
23 2.5 917.86 0.69 0.8307 1.5 106 71 87 93.45242.5 919.825 0.72 0.8485 1.56 106 71 87 98.25
921.815
Run 3 - Intermediate Isokinetic valuesPointDwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 922.524 0.26 0.5099 0.96 104 75 76 101.44
2 2.5 924.12 0.26 0.5099 0.96 103 75 76 103.19
3 2.5 925.745 0.31 0.5568 1.14 103 75 77 99.11
4 2.5 927.45 0.28 0.5292 1.03 104 73 78 103.83
5 2.5 929.145 0.33 0.5745 1.22 103 73 79 106.23
6 2.5 931.03 0.54 0.7348 1.99 103 73 80 92.85
7 2.5 933.135 0.68 0.8246 2.51 103 72 81 117.11
8 2.5 936.11 0.48 0.6928 1.77 104 75 76 82.99
9 2.5 937.88 0.43 0.6557 1.59 106 76 78 103.37
10 2.5 939.97 0.52 0.7211 1.92 106 76 80 101.55
11 2.5 942.23 0.61 0.7810 2.25 106 76 79 101.83
12 2.5 944.68 0.62 0.7874 2.28 105 76 83 100.39
13 2.5 947.126 0.42 0.6481 1.55 109 79 83 100.30
14 2.5 949.14 0.41 0.6403 1.51 108 78 84 100.46
15 2.5 951.135 0.57 0.7550 2.1 107 79 85 103.67
16 2.5 953.565 0.77 0.8775 2.84 107 78 84 97.47
17 2.5 956.21 0.77 0.8775 2.84 108 78 87 101.51
18 2.5 958.97 0.55 0.7416 2.03 108 79 89 102.19
19 2.5 961.33 0.46 0.6782 1.7 108 78 88 93.83
20 2.5 963.31 0.54 0.7348 1.99 106 78 87 103.66
21 2.5 965.68 0.6 0.7746 2.21 106 78 88 101.83
22 2.5 968.135 0.66 0.8124 2.94 106 79 88 103.54232.5 970.75 0.79 0.8888 2.92 106 79 91 104.66
24 2.5 973.65 0.78 0.8832 2.92 107 79 91 94.44
976.248
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919
County Weber County
Unit ID Baghouse # 4
Test Date 9/30/2024
EPA Methods 5 & 202: Determination of Particulate and Condensible Particulate Emissions
from Stationary Sources
Run # 1 2 3 Average
date 9/30/2024 9/30/2024 9/30/2024
start time 11:48 15:49 17:14
stop time 13:05 16:51 18:15
sampling time (minutes) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0
DS stack diameter (inches) 36.000 36.000 36.000 36.00
PAVG average (delta P)½ (" H2O)½0.8079 0.8509 0.8351 0.8313
CP pitot tube constant (unitless) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84
TS stack temp. (°F) 100.9 100.8 101.1 100.9
Pbar barometric pressure (" Hg) 25.85 25.85 25.85 25.85
Ps stack pressure (" H2O)-0.47 -0.47 -0.47 -0.47
Yd meter box Yd (unitless)1.0150 1.0150 1.0150 1.015
Tm meter temp. (°F) 72.80 78.90 80.40 77.37
Vm sample volume (ft3)44.298 47.369 46.413 46.027
H orifice setting delta H (" H2O)1.49 1.63 1.58 1.6
Vlc moisture (g) 5.20 6.4 1.1 4.2
O2%vd oxygen (%vd) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2%vd carbon dioxide (%vd) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
DN nozzle diameter (inches) 0.2220 0.2220 0.2220 0.2220
Run # 1 2 3 Average
grams mass particulate front half (g) 0.00460 0.00280 0.00190 0.00310
grams mass particulate filter (g) -0.00150 -0.00150 -0.00060 -0.00120
Run # 1 2 3 Average
Vmstd sample volume (dscf) 38.635 40.863 39.920 39.806
sample volume (dscm) 1.094 1.157 1.130 1.127
Vwstd moisture volume (dscf) 0.245 0.302 0.052 0.200
Bws measured moisture content (%/100) 0.006 0.007 0.001 0.005
saturated moisture content (%/100) 0.077 0.077 0.077 0.077
actual moisture content (%/100) 0.006 0.007 0.001 0.005
MD molecular weight (dry) 28.84 28.8360 28.84 28.84
MA molecular weight (actual) 28.77 28.76 28.82 28.78
VS gas velocity (ft/sec) 50.4 53.1 52.1 51.9
FACFM gas flow (acfm) 21,378 22,518 22,080 21,992
FDSCFM gas flow (dscfm) 17,263 18,168 17,914 17,782
lb/hr gas flow (lb/hr) 77,764 81,895 80,444 80,034
% % isokinetic 98.2 98.7 97.8 98.2 Permit
Limits
lb/hr F½ PM (lb/hr) 0.1833 0.0765 0.0772 0.1123
gr/dscf F½ PM (gr/dscf) 0.0012 0.0005 0.0005 0.0007
lb/hr Total PM (lb/hr) 0.1833 0.0765 0.0772 0.1123 2.39
gr/dscf Total PM (gr/dscf) 0.0012 0.0005 0.0005 0.0007 0.01
Field Reference Method Data
Laboratory Data
Reference Method Calculations
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919
County Weber County
Unit ID Baghouse # 4Test Date 9/30/2024
Run 1 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 62.937 0.72 0.8485 1.61 96 71 73 100.96
2 2.5 64.935 0.72 0.8485 1.61 99 71 73 98.54
3 2.5 66.88 0.75 0.8660 1.68 99 71 72 101.38
4 2.5 68.92 0.79 0.8888 1.7 99 71 72 98.30
5 2.5 70.95 0.8 0.8944 1.79 99 71 72 94.82
6 2.5 72.92 0.6 0.7746 0.134 99 71 72 100.41
7 2.5 74.735 0.48 0.6928 1.08 102 72 72 95.67
8 2.5 76.275 0.48 0.6928 1.08 102 72 72 97.85
9 2.5 77.85 0.35 0.5916 0.78 102 74 72 97.95
10 2.5 79.2 0.35 0.5916 0.78 102 75 72 101.48
11 2.5 80.6 0.35 0.5916 0.78 102 75 72 97.13
12 2.5 81.94 0.35 0.5916 0.78 102 76 72 98.49
13 2.5 83.3 0.85 0.9220 1.9 98 75 72 97.69
14 2.5 85.401 0.85 0.9220 1.9 99 72 72 98.42
15 2.5 87.51 0.83 0.9110 1.86 99 72 72 99.64
16 2.5 89.62 0.72 0.8485 1.61 102 72 72 99.06
17 2.5 91.57 0.72 0.8485 1.61 103 73 72 98.04
18 2.5 93.5 0.67 0.8185 1.5 103 74 72 97.56
19 2.5 95.355 0.67 0.8185 1.5 103 75 72 98.52
20 2.5 97.23 0.75 0.8660 1.68 103 75 72 92.92
21 2.5 99.1 0.8 0.8944 1.79 103 76 72 100.49
22 2.5 101.19 0.77 0.8775 1.72 102 77 72 94.64
23 2.5 103.125 0.8 0.8944 1.79 102 77 72 98.62
24 2.5 105.18 0.8 0.8944 1.79 102 77 72 98.62
107.235
Run 2 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 7.706 0.8 0.8944 1.79 96 75 75 99.23
2 2.5 9.785 0.8 0.8944 1.79 99 75 75 99.50
3 2.5 11.95 0.7 0.8367 1.57 100 75 75 110.80
4 2.5 13.8 0.65 0.8062 1.46 100 76 75 98.13
5 2.5 15.645 0.65 0.8062 1.46 100 77 75 97.77
6 2.5 17.54 0.6 0.7746 1.34 100 78 75 104.39
7 2.5 19.265 0.75 0.8660 1.7 100 80 75 84.92
8 2.5 21.265 0.82 0.9055 1.84 103 81 75 94.37
9 2.5 23.4 0.6 0.7746 1.34 103 82 75 117.49
10 2.5 25.235 0.6 0.7746 1.34 103 83 75 100.89
11 2.5 27.05 0.6 0.7746 1.34 103 83 76 99.69
12 2.5 28.875 0.6 0.7746 1.34 104 84 76 100.24
13 2.5 30.689 0.84 0.9165 1.88 101 83 76 84.19
14 2.5 32.8 0.84 0.9165 1.88 101 83 76 97.97
15 2.5 34.925 0.82 0.9055 1.84 100 84 77 99.53
16 2.5 37.01 0.65 0.8062 1.46 98 84 77 109.38
17 2.5 38.875 0.65 0.8062 1.46 100 84 77 98.01
18 2.5 40.73 0.68 0.8246 1.53 100 84 77 95.33
19 2.5 42.635 0.85 0.9220 1.92 101 85 77 87.66
20 2.5 44.95 0.85 0.9220 1.92 102 85 77 106.62
21 2.5 46.94 0.85 0.9220 1.92 102 85 77 91.65
22 2.5 49.1 0.75 0.8660 1.7 101 84 77 105.84
23 2.5 51.1 0.75 0.8660 1.7 101 84 78 97.91242.5 53.1 0.75 0.8660 1.7 101 85 78 97.82
55.102
Run 3 - Intermediate Isokinetic valuesPointDwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 56.512 0.7 0.8367 1.57 104 78 77 103.16
2 2.5 58.54 0.75 0.8660 1.69 103 78 77 96.76
3 2.5 60.51 0.78 0.8832 1.75 103 78 77 96.35
4 2.5 62.51 0.8 0.8944 1.8 104 80 77 96.96
5 2.5 64.55 0.8 0.8944 1.8 103 81 77 95.36
6 2.5 66.56 0.6 0.7746 1.35 103 82 77 100.57
7 2.5 68.4 0.86 0.9274 1.97 103 83 77 97.78
8 2.5 70.54 0.8 0.8944 1.8 104 84 77 95.65
9 2.5 72.56 0.65 0.8062 1.46 106 84 78 97.96
10 2.5 74.425 0.6 0.7746 1.35 106 85 78 99.10
11 2.5 76.24 0.6 0.7746 1.35 106 86 78 99.28
12 2.5 78.06 0.6 0.7746 1.35 105 86 78 98.92
13 2.5 79.875 0.75 0.8660 1.7 109 83 78 99.44
14 2.5 81.9 0.77 0.8775 1.73 108 84 78 96.04
15 2.5 83.885 0.77 0.8775 1.73 107 84 78 98.85
16 2.5 85.93 0.78 0.8832 1.75 107 84 78 97.02
17 2.5 87.95 0.68 0.8246 1.53 108 84 78 100.85
18 2.5 89.91 0.65 0.8062 1.46 108 84 78 97.61
19 2.5 91.765 0.55 0.7416 1.24 108 84 78 99.18
20 2.5 93.5 0.55 0.7416 1.24 106 84 78 99.29
21 2.5 95.24 0.57 0.7550 1.28 106 84 78 98.11
22 2.5 96.99 0.75 0.8660 1.69 106 85 78 98.26232.5 99 0.75 0.8660 1.69 106 84 78 97.86
24 2.5 101 0.7 0.8367 1.57 107 84 78 97.55
102.925
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919
County Weber County
Unit ID Baghouse # 5
Test Date 10/1/2024
EPA Methods 5 & 202: Determination of Particulate and Condensible Particulate Emissions
from Stationary Sources
Run # 1 2 3 Average
date 10/1/2024 10/1/2024 10/1/2024
start time 10:19 12:08 13:47
stop time 11:21 13:10 14:49
sampling time (minutes) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0
DS stack diameter (inches) 24.000 24.000 24.000 24.00
PAVG average (delta P)½ (" H2O)½0.6714 0.6412 0.6723 0.6616
CP pitot tube constant (unitless) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84
TS stack temp. (°F) 108.4 107.3 110.0 108.6
Pbar barometric pressure (" Hg) 25.90 25.90 25.90 25.90
Ps stack pressure (" H2O)-0.65 -0.65 -0.65 -0.65
Yd meter box Yd (unitless)1.0150 1.0150 1.0150 1.015
Tm meter temp. (°F) 85.30 91.90 84.70 87.30
Vm sample volume (ft3)59.229 52.917 55.758 55.968
H orifice setting delta H (" H2O)2.74 2.13 2.32 2.4
Vlc moisture (g) 6.00 5.3 3.8 5.0
O2%vd oxygen (%vd) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2%vd carbon dioxide (%vd) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
DN nozzle diameter (inches) 0.2805 0.2695 0.2695 0.2732
Run # 1 2 3 Average
grams mass particulate front half (g) 0.00190 0.00400 0.00230 0.00273
grams mass particulate filter (g) -0.00040 -0.00070 -0.00130 -0.00080
Run # 1 2 3 Average
Vmstd sample volume (dscf) 50.750 44.722 47.771 47.747
sample volume (dscm) 1.437 1.266 1.353 1.352
Vwstd moisture volume (dscf) 0.283 0.250 0.179 0.237
Bws measured moisture content (%/100) 0.006 0.006 0.004 0.005
saturated moisture content (%/100) 0.096 0.093 0.100 0.096
actual moisture content (%/100) 0.006 0.006 0.004 0.005
MD molecular weight (dry) 28.84 28.8360 28.84 28.84
MA molecular weight (actual) 28.78 28.78 28.80 28.78
VS gas velocity (ft/sec) 42.1 40.2 42.2 41.5
FACFM gas flow (acfm) 7,942 7,577 7,961 7,827
FDSCFM gas flow (dscfm) 6,342 6,063 6,351 6,252
lb/hr gas flow (lb/hr) 28,557 27,299 28,564 28,140
% % isokinetic 97.7 97.6 99.5 98.3 Permit
Limits
lb/hr F½ PM (lb/hr) 0.0248 0.0592 0.0176 0.0339
gr/dscf F½ PM (gr/dscf) 0.0005 0.0011 0.0003 0.0006
lb/hr Total PM (lb/hr) 0.0248 0.0592 0.0176 0.0339 1.63
gr/dscf Total PM (gr/dscf) 0.0005 0.0011 0.0003 0.0006 0.01
Field Reference Method Data
Laboratory Data
Reference Method Calculations
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919
County Weber County
Unit ID Baghouse # 5Test Date 10/1/2024
Run 1 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 3.483 0.55 0.7416 3.06 108 80 79 96.71
2 2.5 6.15 0.5 0.7071 2.79 108 78 80 98.52
3 2.5 8.74 0.62 0.7874 3.46 107 78 80 97.79
4 2.5 11.6 0.45 0.6708 2.51 107 78 80 98.07
5 2.5 14.05 0.4 0.6325 2.23 108 80 80 98.96
6 2.5 16.385 0.5 0.7071 2.83 109 81 80 98.53
7 2.5 18.98 0.15 0.3873 0.85 108 83 81 100.97
8 2.5 20.45 0.15 0.3873 0.85 110 84 81 98.99
9 2.5 21.89 0.15 0.3873 0.85 109 85 82 96.66
10 2.5 23.3 0.12 0.3464 0.68 110 89 82 94.73
11 2.5 24.54 0.12 0.3464 0.68 110 89 83 96.17
12 2.5 25.8 0.12 0.3464 0.68 108 90 83 95.23
13 2.5 27.051 0.58 0.7616 3.3 110 91 85 99.28
14 2.5 29.9 0.63 0.7937 3.6 110 92 84 97.38
15 2.5 32.81 0.67 0.8185 3.82 107 91 85 97.96
16 2.5 35.835 0.65 0.8062 3.7 107 90 86 97.13
17 2.5 38.79 0.65 0.8062 3.7 107 90 87 98.19
18 2.5 41.78 0.65 0.8062 3.7 107 90 87 96.05
19 2.5 44.705 0.65 0.8062 3.7 108 90 87 97.62
20 2.5 47.675 0.66 0.8124 3.76 108 89 87 99.75
21 2.5 50.73 0.7 0.8367 3.99 107 89 88 97.23
22 2.5 53.8 0.65 0.8062 3.7 108 90 88 97.86
23 2.5 56.78 0.65 0.8062 3.7 110 91 88 102.54
24 2.5 59.9 0.65 0.8062 3.7 110 92 88 92.33
62.712
Run 2 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 64.427 0.66 0.8124 3.2 106 88 89 99.08
2 2.5 67.24 0.66 0.8124 3.2 107 88 89 99.17
3 2.5 69.995 0.6 0.7746 2.91 107 89 89 101.69
4 2.5 72.66 0.64 0.8000 3.11 108 90 89 95.29
5 2.5 75.4 0.45 0.6708 2.18 107 92 89 116.22
6 2.5 77.74 0.49 0.7000 2.38 108 92 89 95.26
7 2.5 80.14 0.15 0.3873 0.73 109 93 89 175.75
8 2.5 81.5 0.15 0.3873 0.73 108 93 89 99.51
9 2.5 82.86 0.14 0.3742 0.68 108 94 89 102.89
10 2.5 84.13 0.14 0.3742 0.68 107 95 89 95.91
11 2.5 85.425 0.14 0.3742 0.68 108 95 89 97.88
12 2.5 86.73 0.14 0.3742 0.68 108 96 89 98.55
13 2.5 88.06 0.59 0.7681 2.86 110 96 90 49.27
14 2.5 90.63 0.8 0.8944 3.88 109 96 90 81.92
15 2.5 93.775 0.62 0.7874 3.01 108 95 90 113.61
16 2.5 96.4 0.6 0.7746 2.91 110 95 90 96.53
17 2.5 99.065 0.5 0.7071 2.43 111 95 90 107.31
18 2.5 101.47 0.45 0.6708 2.18 108 96 90 101.64
19 2.5 103.77 0.56 0.7483 2.72 108 96 90 87.27
20 2.5 106.35 0.35 0.5916 1.7 106 96 90 123.25
21 2.5 108.425 0.35 0.5916 1.7 105 98 90 98.86
22 2.5 110.425 0.45 0.6708 2.18 104 98 90 84.08
23 2.5 112.725 0.45 0.6708 2.18 102 99 90 96.43242.5 115.111 0.45 0.6708 2.18 103 99 90 100.12
117.344
Run 3 - Intermediate Isokinetic valuesPointDwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 18.007 0.46 0.6782 2.23 111 83 86 104.70
2 2.5 20.47 0.55 0.7416 2.67 110 82 86 90.70
3 2.5 22.8 0.55 0.7416 2.67 110 83 84 98.69
4 2.5 25.333 0.46 0.6782 2.23 111 83 84 100.38
5 2.5 27.69 0.5 0.7071 2.43 112 84 84 100.54
6 2.5 30.15 0.64 0.8000 3.11 110 85 83 98.09
7 2.5 32.865 0.27 0.5196 1.31 109 86 83 103.86
8 2.5 34.745 0.18 0.4243 0.87 110 86 83 99.90
9 2.5 36.222 0.21 0.4583 1.02 110 87 82 98.85
10 2.5 37.8 0.14 0.3742 0.68 109 88 82 99.47
11 2.5 39.1 0.14 0.3742 0.68 109 89 82 97.08
12 2.5 40.37 0.14 0.3742 0.68 109 89 82 97.85
13 2.5 41.65 0.58 0.7616 2.82 109 87 82 99.55
14 2.5 44.28 0.58 0.7616 2.82 110 88 82 99.93
15 2.5 46.92 0.7 0.8367 3.4 111 87 82 99.57
16 2.5 49.8 0.7 0.8367 3.4 110 87 82 100.17
17 2.5 52.7 0.75 0.8660 3.64 110 87 82 99.18
18 2.5 55.67 0.77 0.8775 3.74 110 87 82 99.23
19 2.5 58.68 0.48 0.6928 2.33 110 87 82 100.65
20 2.5 61.1 0.6 0.7746 2.91 109 88 82 98.56
21 2.5 63.75 0.5 0.7071 2.43 109 89 83 103.56
22 2.5 66.3 0.54 0.7348 2.62 110 89 83 95.68232.5 68.745 0.5 0.7071 2.43 110 89 83 102.03
24 2.5 71.255 0.5 0.7071 2.43 111 89 83 102.12
73.765
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919
County Weber County
Unit ID Baghouse # 6
Test Date 10/2/2024
EPA Methods 5 & 202: Determination of Particulate and Condensible Particulate Emissions
from Stationary Sources
Run # 1 2 3 Average
date 10/2/2024 10/2/2024 10/2/2024
start time 8:25 10:02 11:54
stop time 9:27 11:12 12:55
sampling time (minutes) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0
DS stack diameter (inches) 36.000 36.000 36.000 36.00
PAVG average (delta P)½ (" H2O)½0.9354 0.9783 1.1102 1.0080
CP pitot tube constant (unitless) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84
TS stack temp. (°F) 97.6 99.3 100.7 99.2
Pbar barometric pressure (" Hg) 25.75 25.75 25.75 25.75
Ps stack pressure (" H2O)-0.74 -0.74 -0.74 -0.74
Yd meter box Yd (unitless)1.0150 1.0150 1.0150 1.015
Tm meter temp. (°F) 66.40 89.20 100.20 85.27
Vm sample volume (ft3)51.038 59.284 63.761 58.028
H orifice setting delta H (" H2O)1.96 2.55 2.86 2.5
Vlc moisture (g) 4.40 2.0 1.2 2.5
O2%vd oxygen (%vd) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2%vd carbon dioxide (%vd) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
DN nozzle diameter (inches) 0.2220 0.2220 0.2220 0.2220
Run # 1 2 3 Average
grams mass particulate front half (g) 0.00290 0.00270 0.00140 0.00233
grams mass particulate filter (g) -0.00010 -0.00060 -0.00020 -0.00030
Run # 1 2 3 Average
Vmstd sample volume (dscf) 44.941 50.119 52.891 49.317
sample volume (dscm) 1.273 1.419 1.498 1.396
Vwstd moisture volume (dscf) 0.208 0.094 0.057 0.119
Bws measured moisture content (%/100) 0.005 0.002 0.001 0.003
saturated moisture content (%/100) 0.070 0.074 0.077 0.073
actual moisture content (%/100) 0.005 0.002 0.001 0.003
MD molecular weight (dry) 28.84 28.8360 28.84 28.84
MA molecular weight (actual) 28.79 28.82 28.82 28.81
VS gas velocity (ft/sec) 58.3 61.0 69.3 62.9
FACFM gas flow (acfm) 24,728 25,888 29,411 26,676
FDSCFM gas flow (dscfm) 20,028 20,961 23,773 21,587
lb/hr gas flow (lb/hr) 90,122 94,160 106,738 97,007
% % isokinetic 98.5 104.9 97.6 100.3 Permit
Limits
lb/hr F½ PM (lb/hr) 0.1651 0.1162 0.0714 0.1175
gr/dscf F½ PM (gr/dscf) 0.0010 0.0006 0.0004 0.0007
lb/hr Total PM (lb/hr) 0.1651 0.1162 0.0714 0.1175 1.85
gr/dscf Total PM (gr/dscf) 0.0010 0.0006 0.0004 0.0007 0.01
Field Reference Method Data
Laboratory Data
Reference Method Calculations
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919
County Weber County
Unit ID Baghouse # 6Test Date 10/2/2024
Run 1 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 74.715 0.62 0.7874 1.32 96 53 49 102.51
2 2.5 76.53 0.62 0.7874 1.32 96 53 49 95.56
3 2.5 78.222 0.62 0.7874 1.32 96 55 51 98.90
4 2.5 79.98 0.63 0.7937 1.35 96 58 52 97.85
5 2.5 81.74 0.72 0.8485 1.54 97 60 52 97.72
6 2.5 83.62 0.73 0.8544 1.56 96 62 54 99.68
7 2.5 85.56 0.94 0.9695 2.01 97 64 55 97.05
8 2.5 87.705 0.95 0.9747 2.03 98 66 56 99.05
9 2.5 89.91 0.87 0.9327 1.86 98 68 57 94.74
10 2.5 91.935 0.95 0.9747 1.85 98 69 58 92.23
11 2.5 93.999 0.83 0.9110 1.81 98 71 60 99.57
12 2.5 96.09 0.83 0.9110 1.81 98 72 61 99.42
13 2.5 98.182 0.8 0.8944 1.74 98 74 63 97.54
14 2.5 100.205 0.8 0.8944 1.74 99 74 63 98.21
15 2.5 102.24 0.81 0.9000 1.76 99 75 65 97.81
16 2.5 104.285 0.55 0.7416 1.2 99 77 66 99.97
17 2.5 106.015 0.55 0.7416 1.2 99 78 67 98.34
18 2.5 107.72 0.55 0.7416 1.2 99 79 68 98.44
19 2.5 109.43 1.4 1.1832 3.1 99 80 69 95.78
20 2.5 112.075 1.4 1.1832 3.1 97 83 69 99.12
21 2.5 114.825 1.4 1.1832 3.1 97 84 71 99.38
22 2.5 117.59 1.4 1.1832 3.1 97 85 72 99.56
23 2.5 120.365 1.35 1.1619 3.02 98 86 73 97.98
24 2.5 123.05 1.35 1.1619 3.02 98 86 74 98.55
125.753
Run 2 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 26.403 1 1.0000 2.24 97 82 82 100.63
2 2.5 28.8 0.9 0.9487 2.04 99 82 82 106.20
3 2.5 30.999 0.9 0.9487 2.04 99 84 83 97.16
4 2.5 33.252 0.9 0.9487 2.04 99 85 83 99.45
5 2.5 35.495 0.96 0.9798 2.17 99 87 83 95.73
6 2.5 37.81 0.96 0.9798 2.17 99 88 84 98.62
7 2.5 40.16 1.4 1.1832 3.16 99 89 84 83.05
8 2.5 42.935 1.5 1.2247 3.4 99 90 84 94.73
9 2.5 45.81 1.1 1.0488 2.5 101 90 84 114.52
10 2.5 48.32 1.2 1.0954 2.71 101 90 85 95.69
11 2.5 50.9 1.2 1.0954 2.71 100 92 85 98.09
12 2.5 53.489 1.1 1.0488 2.5 99 93 86 102.47
13 2.5 56.007 1.1 1.0488 2.5 99 92 86 99.75
14 2.5 58.33 1.1 1.0488 2.5 99 94 86 91.86
15 2.5 60.628 0.7 0.8367 1.6 98 92 89 113.42
16 2.5 62.6 0.77 0.8775 1.76 99 92 89 92.92
17 2.5 64.635 0.65 0.8062 1.5 100 93 89 104.29
18 2.5 66.635 0.65 0.8062 1.5 99 95 90 102.13
19 2.5 68.5 1.35 1.1619 3.08 99 96 90 66.32
20 2.5 71.75 1.4 1.1832 3.2 99 98 90 113.32
21 2.5 74 1.5 1.2247 3.43 99 99 97 75.30
22 2.5 76.9 1.5 1.2247 3.43 100 99 92 97.57
23 2.5 79.8 1.6 1.2649 3.65 100 99 92 94.53242.5 82.8 1.5 1.2247 3.43 100 99 92 100.94
25 85.687
Run 3 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 86.314 0.8 0.8944 1.83 99 96 98 103.26
2 2.5 88.575 0.83 0.9110 1.9 100 96 97 96.81
3 2.5 90.73 0.87 0.9327 2 99969897.05
4 2.5 92.945 0.9 0.9487 2.06 99 98 98 97.63
5 2.5 95.215 0.95 0.9747 2.17 99 99 98 98.94
6 2.5 97.58 0.95 0.9747 2.17 100 102 98 101.06
7 2.5 100 1.8 1.3416 4.11 101 104 99 94.74
8 2.5 103.111 1.8 1.3416 14.11 101 105 99 99.76
9 2.5 106.3 1.35 1.1619 3.08 101 105 99 98.08
10 2.5 109.1 1.2 1.0954 2.74 101 105 99 96.88
11 2.5 111.71 1.15 1.0724 2.63 101 105 99 100.07
12 2.5 114.35 1.15 1.0724 2.63 100 105 99 98.20
13 2.5 116.943 1.1 1.0488 2.51 102 105 98 99.24
14 2.5 119.5 1.1 1.0488 2.51 102 104 98 97.12
15 2.5 122 1.15 1.0724 2.63 103 104 98 98.90
16 2.5 124.6 1.15 1.0724 2.63 103 104 98 97.00
17 2.5 127.15 1.25 1.1180 2.86 102 105 98 96.76
18 2.5 129.805 1.25 1.1180 2.86 102 105 97 97.94
19 2.5 132.49 1.35 1.1619 3.08 101 105 97 96.85
20 2.5 135.25 1.5 1.2247 3.43 100 106 97 61.04
21 2.5 137.085 1.55 1.2450 3.54 99 106 97 132.45
22 2.5 141.135 1.75 1.3229 4 99 106 97 96.77232.5 144.275 1.6 1.2649 3.65 101 105 97 96.05
24 2.5 147.25 1.5 1.2247 3.43 101 105 97 99.97
150.25
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919
County Weber County
Unit ID Baghouse # 8
Test Date 10/2/2024 - 10/3/2024
EPA Methods 5 & 202: Determination of Particulate and Condensible Particulate Emissions
from Stationary Sources
Run # 1 2 3 Average
date 10/2/2024 10/2/2024 10/3/2024
start time 14:24 15:50 7:47
stop time 15:37 16:57 8:56
sampling time (minutes) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0
DS stack diameter (inches) 24.000 24.000 24.000 24.00
PAVG average (delta P)½ (" H2O)½0.5361 0.5509 0.5683 0.5518
CP pitot tube constant (unitless) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84
TS stack temp. (°F) 102.5 102.9 94.1 99.8
Pbar barometric pressure (" Hg) 25.75 25.75 25.70 25.73
Ps stack pressure (" H2O)-0.65 -0.65 -0.65 -0.65
Yd meter box Yd (unitless)1.0150 1.0150 1.0150 1.015
Tm meter temp. (°F) 89.90 92.40 58.00 80.10
Vm sample volume (ft3)47.538 49.085 48.673 48.432
H orifice setting delta H (" H2O)1.71 1.80 1.85 1.8
Vlc moisture (g) 0.30 4.4 5.4 3.4
O2%vd oxygen (%vd) 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO2%vd carbon dioxide (%vd) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
DN nozzle diameter (inches) 0.2795 0.2790 0.2795 0.2793
Run # 1 2 3 Average
grams mass particulate front half (g) 0.00080 0.00080 0.00140 0.00100
grams mass particulate filter (g) -0.00040 -0.00010 -0.00010 -0.00020
Run # 1 2 3 Average
Vmstd sample volume (dscf) 40.042 41.169 43.456 41.556
sample volume (dscm) 1.134 1.166 1.231 1.177
Vwstd moisture volume (dscf) 0.014 0.208 0.255 0.159
Bws measured moisture content (%/100) 0.000 0.005 0.006 0.004
saturated moisture content (%/100) 0.081 0.082 0.063 0.075
actual moisture content (%/100) 0.000 0.005 0.006 0.004
MD molecular weight (dry) 28.84 28.8360 28.84 28.84
MA molecular weight (actual) 28.83 28.78 28.77 28.80
VS gas velocity (ft/sec) 33.5 34.5 35.3 34.5
FACFM gas flow (acfm) 6,321 6,503 6,663 6,496
FDSCFM gas flow (dscfm) 5,098 5,217 5,415 5,243
lb/hr gas flow (lb/hr) 22,877 23,480 24,385 23,581
% % isokinetic 96.6 97.4 98.7 97.6 Permit
Limits
lb/hr F½ PM (lb/hr) 0.0067 0.0117 0.0214 0.0133
gr/dscf F½ PM (gr/dscf) 0.0002 0.0003 0.0005 0.0003
lb/hr Total PM (lb/hr) 0.0067 0.0117 0.0214 0.0133 1.63
gr/dscf Total PM (gr/dscf) 0.0002 0.0003 0.0005 0.0003 0.01
Field Reference Method Data
Laboratory Data
Reference Method Calculations
Company Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Facility Ogden Plant ; Site ID: 10919
County Weber County
Unit ID Baghouse # 8Test Date 10/2/2024 - 10/3/2024
Run 1 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 50.834 0.33 0.5745 1.89 103 86 87 95.66
2 2.5 52.92 0.37 0.6083 2.12 102 86 87 97.73
3 2.5 55.177 0.25 0.5000 1.93 102 87 87 95.89
4 2.5 57 0.35 0.5916 2 102 87 87 88.48
5 2.5 58.99 0.35 0.5916 2 102 90 86 94.76
6 2.5 61.125 0.4 0.6325 2.3 103 92 86 98.59
7 2.5 63.5 0.4 0.6325 2.3 104 93 86 98.38
8 2.5 65.87 0.42 0.6481 2.41 104 94 86 96.77
9 2.5 68.26 0.5 0.7071 2.87 102 95 87 96.70
10 2.5 70.872 0.35 0.5916 2 100 95 87 96.41
11 2.5 73.06 0.4 0.6325 2.3 100 93 87 99.60
12 2.5 75.47 0.4 0.6325 2.3 101 95 87 97.85
13 2.5 77.84 0.3 0.5477 1.72 101 93 87 99.18
14 2.5 79.92 0.3 0.5477 1.72 102 93 87 100.23
15 2.5 82.02 0.4 0.6325 2.3 102 95 87 98.35
16 2.5 84.4 0.25 0.5000 1.44 104 96 88 95.68
17 2.5 86.235 0.3 0.5477 1.72 104 96 88 95.37
18 2.5 88.237 0.2 0.4472 1.15 104 95 88 96.96
19 2.5 89.9 0.2 0.4472 1.15 104 92 89 96.38
20 2.5 91.55 0.2 0.4472 1.15 103 93 89 96.20
21 2.5 93.2 0.15 0.3873 0.86 102 94 89 95.89
22 2.5 94.628 0.15 0.3873 0.86 104 90 89 94.99
23 2.5 96.035 0.1 0.3162 0.57 103 93 89 95.90
24 2.5 97.2 0.1 0.3162 0.57 101 94 89 96.22
98.372
Run 2 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 99.255 0.3 0.5477 1.71 102 90 89 101.78
2 2.5 101.37 0.45 0.6708 2.57 103 90 89 83.38
3 2.5 103.94 0.4 0.6325 2.3 104 92 89 107.28
4 2.5 106.322 0.35 0.5916 2 104 92 89 106.21
5 2.5 108.48 0.35 0.5916 2 103 92 89 96.14
6 2.5 110.61 0.35 0.5916 2 104 92 89 94.97
7 2.5 112.74 0.39 0.6245 2.17 102 93 89 89.77
8 2.5 115.011 0.4 0.6325 2.3 103 94 89 94.54
9 2.5 117.315 0.45 0.6708 2.57 105 95 89 90.58
10 2.5 119.9 0.45 0.6708 2.57 105 96 89 101.54
11 2.5 122.43 0.4 0.6325 2.3 104 98 89 105.04
12 2.5 124.822 0.3 0.5477 1.71 102 98 89 114.28
13 2.5 126.875 0.3 0.5477 1.71 101 93 89 98.44
14 2.5 128.915 0.38 0.6164 2.17 102 93 89 87.10
15 2.5 131.2 0.35 0.5916 2 101 94 89 101.43
16 2.5 133.4 0.42 0.6481 2.4 102 96 90 89.08
17 2.5 135.7 0.4 0.6325 2.28 103 97 90 95.40
18 2.5 138.045 0.3 0.5477 1.71 104 98 90 112.13
19 2.5 140.057 0.15 0.3873 0.86 103 99 90 135.49
20 2.5 141.475 0.15 0.3873 0.86 102 95 91 95.66
21 2.5 142.9 0.12 0.3464 0.68 102 96 92 107.23
22 2.5 144.17 0.12 0.3464 0.68 102 97 92 95.48
23 2.5 145.46 0.15 0.3873 0.86 103 98 93 86.71242.5 146.885 0.15 0.3873 0.86 103 99 93 95.70
25 148.24
Run 3 - Intermediate Isokinetic values
Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%
Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics
1 2.5 48.83 0.4 0.6325 2.31 92 49 49 105.45
2 2.5 51.2 0.4 0.6325 2.31 92 50 49 101.35
3 2.5 53.48 0.4 0.6325 2.31 92 50 49 99.57
4 2.5 55.72 0.44 0.6633 2.41 94 54 49 99.84
5 2.5 58.08 0.32 0.5657 1.75 96 56 49 98.02
6 2.5 60.06 0.45 0.6708 2.46 96 58 49 99.78
7 2.5 62.45 0.55 0.7416 3.01 96 61 49 98.24
8 2.5 65.055 0.45 0.6708 2.46 93 61 50 101.41
9 2.5 67.5 0.45 0.6708 2.46 91 63 51 99.61
10 2.5 69.913 0.35 0.5916 1.92 92 59 51 98.24
11 2.5 72.005 0.45 0.6708 2.2 93 61 51 92.75
12 2.5 74.245 0.3 0.5477 1.64 93 64 52 97.19
13 2.5 76.172 0.45 0.6708 2.46 95 61 52 99.45
14 2.5 78.57 0.34 0.5831 1.86 95 65 52 97.50
15 2.5 80.625 0.4 0.6325 2.2 93 63 54 98.25
16 2.5 82.873 0.35 0.5916 1.92 94 64 55 97.57
17 2.5 84.965 0.35 0.5916 1.92 94 66 55 99.38
18 2.5 87.1 0.3 0.5477 1.64 93 68 56 101.60
19 2.5 89.13 0.15 0.3873 0.82 95 69 57 96.73
20 2.5 90.5 0.15 0.3873 0.82 96 70 58 94.51
21 2.5 91.84 0.2 0.4472 1.09 97 71 58 93.53
22 2.5 93.37 0.14 0.3742 0.77 96 74 59 98.81232.5 94.73 0.15 0.3873 0.82 95 75 61 96.72
24 2.5 96.113 0.15 0.3873 0.82 95 75 61 97.21
97.503

PARTICULATE MATTER COMPLIANCE TESTS
CONDUCTED AT KIMBERLY-CLARK, INC.
FORMING BAGHOUSES #1, # 2, #3, #4
RECLAIM BAGHOUSE #6,
COLLECTOR BAGHOUSES #5, #8

September 30 – October 3, 2024

By:

TETCO
391 East 620 South
American Fork, UT 84003

Prepared for:

Kimberly-Clark
2010 North Rulon White Blvd.
Ogden, UT 84404-0715

Date of Report:

October 10, 2024

CERTIFICATION OF REPORT INTEGRITY
Technical Emissions Testing Company (TETCO) certifies that this repo1t represents the
truth as well as can be derived by the methods employed. Every effort was made to obtain
accurate and representative data and to comply with procedures set forth in the Federal Register.
Dean A. Kitchen
Reviewcr: ___ ~~~-~--=~~~-~--
Datc: / t:J-/ I-e'i -----~------~-
Xuan N. Dang
Date: I O !,., /Lr -------u---LJ~ ... -· -jt,,~'-7-7---
ii

iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
Introduction
Test Purpose .........................................................................................................................1
Test Location and Type of Process ......................................................................................1
Test Dates.............................................................................................................................1
Pollutants Tested and Methods Applied ............................................................................. 1
Test Participants .................................................................................................................. 2
Deviations from EPA Methods ............................................................................................2
Quality Assurance ................................................................................................................2

Summary of Results
Emission Results ..................................................................................................................3
Process Data .........................................................................................................................3
Allowable Emissions ...........................................................................................................3
Discussion of Errors or Irregularities ...................................................................................4
Description of Collected Samples ........................................................................................4
Percent Isokinetic Sampling ................................................................................................5

Source Operation
Process Control Devices Operation .....................................................................................6
Process Representativeness ..................................................................................................6

Sampling and Analytical Procedures
Sampling Port Location .......................................................................................................7
Sampling Point Location......................................................................................................7
Sampling Train Description .................................................................................................8
Sampling and Analytical Procedures ...................................................................................8
Quality Assurance ................................................................................................................8

Appendices
A: Complete Results and Sample Calculations
B: Raw Field Data
C: Laboratory Data and Chain of Custody
D: Production Data
E: Calibration Procedures and Results
F: Related Correspondence

iv
LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

I Measured Particulate Matter Emissions...................................................................3
II Allowable Emissions ...............................................................................................4
III Percent Isokinetics ...................................................................................................5
IV Sampling Point Location..........................................................................................6
V Complete Results, Baghouse #1 ............................................................ Appendix A
VI Complete Results, Baghouse #2 ............................................................ Appendix A
VII Complete Results, Baghouse #3 ............................................................ Appendix A
VIII Complete Results, Baghouse #4 ............................................................ Appendix A
IX Complete Results, Baghouse #5 ............................................................ Appendix A
X Complete Results, Baghouse #6 ............................................................ Appendix A
XI Complete Results, Baghouse #8 ............................................................ Appendix A

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure

1 Facility Schematic Representation Baghouses #1- #4 & #6 .............................. Appendix D
2 Facility Schematic Representation Baghouses #5 & #8 .................................... Appendix D
3 Schematic of Method 5 Sampling Train ............................................................ Appendix E

1
INTRODUCTION

Test Purpose

This testing project was conducted to determine compliance with Kimberly-Clark Inc.’s Approval
Order Number DAQE AN0109190017-19. The Approval Order requires testing for particulate
emissions from each baghouse exhaust every five years. Emissions are expressed in terms of grains
per dry standard cubic foot (gr/dscf) and pounds per hour (lb/hr).

Test Location and Type of Process

Kimberly-Clark is located in Ogden, Utah. The process manufactures disposable diapers and boxes
the product for market. The dust emitted from the diaper machines and other process activity is
transferred by dust filter fans to bag filter rooms. The emissions are collected in bag filters. The
clean air is exhausted to the atmosphere through the building roof by a fan located above each bag
filter room.

Test Dates

September 30, 2024: Three test runs were completed on Baghouses #2 and #6.

October 1, 2024: Three test runs were completed on Baghouses #1 and #5, one test run was
completed on Baghouse #2.

October 2, 2024: Two remaining test runs were completed on Baghouse #2, three test runs were
completed on Baghouse #6, and two test runs were completed on Baghouse #8.

October 3, 2024: One remaining test run was completed on Baghouses #8.

Pollutants Tested and Methods Applied

Particulate matter testing was performed according to EPA Method 5 for total particulate matter
(PM) and not PM10 with all particulate matter captured counted as PM10 as per the test protocol.

For reasons stated in the test protocol, condensible particulate matter (CPM) was not measured.

2
Test Participants

Kimberly-Clark Mike Jones

State DAQ None

TETCO Dean Kitchen Jeremiah Opthof
Xuan Dang Mike McNamara

Deviations from EPA Methods

None.

Quality Assurance

Testing Procedures and sample recovery techniques were according to those outlined in the Federal
Register and the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems.

3
SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Emission Results

Table I presents the PM test results. Tables V through XI in Appendix A have more detailed testing
data.

Table I. Measured Particulate Matter Emissions
Sources gr/dscf lb/hr
Baghouse #1 0.0010 0.13
Baghouse #2 0.0005 0.06
Baghouse #3 0.0010 0.12
Baghouse #4 0.0007 0.11
Baghouse #5 0.0006 0.03
Baghouse #6 0.0007 0.12
Baghouse #8 0.0003 0.01

Process Data

The process was operated according to standard procedures. All pertinent process data was available
for recording by agency personnel. Baghouses #1-#4 serve one or two diaper machines each, and
Baghouse #6 serves the reclaim unit; these machines may stop frequently in the diaper making
process as part of the normal operation. Testing continued on these baghouses when there was at
least one diaper machine operating. Baghouses #5 and #8 control dust from Baghouses #1- #4 and #6
bottoms. The testing crews were in contact with Kimberly-Clark personnel in order to coordinate
testing when the diaper machines were operating. Start and stop times are indicated on each
individual test run sheet.

Baghouse pressure drop readings (ΔP’s) and production rates were maintained by Kimberly-Clark.

4

Allowable Emissions

The allowable emissions for these sources are listed in Table II.

Table II. Allowable Emissions
Sources gr/dscf lb/hr
Baghouse #1 0.01 1.63
Baghouse #2 0.01 1.63
Baghouse #3 0.01 1.83
Baghouse #4 0.01 2.39
Baghouse #5 0.01 1.63
Baghouse #6 0.01 1.85
Baghouse #8 0.01 1.63

Discussion of Errors or Irregularities

The sample filters often demonstrate a negative weight. This is due to a portion of the filter adhering
to the gasket between the filter media and the glass frit filter support. This filter material is carefully
scrapped and washed from the gasket and included in the probe wash.

Filter scrapings are added to the wash because they often have a static charge. If placed with the
filter, they tend to “jump” and adhere to the filter container or “leap” out of the container when
opened. These pieces remain with the sample by placing them in the wash.

Description of Collected Samples

There was no visible particulate on any of the test filters. The front washes all appeared clear.

5

Percent Isokinetic Sampling

Each particulate matter test run was isokinetic within the ±10% of 100% criterion specified in the
Federal Register. Isokinetic values for each EPA Method 5 test run are presented in Table III.

Table III. Percent Isokinetics
Sources Run Percent Isokinetics
Baghouse #1
1 99
2 102
3 105
Baghouse #2
1 101
2 103
3 101
Baghouse #3
1 100
2 100
3 100
Baghouse #4
1 98
2 99
3 98
Baghouse #5
1 98
2 98
3 100
Baghouse #6
1 98
2 105
3 98
Baghouse #8
1 103
2 103
3 94

6
SOURCE OPERATION

Process Control Devices Operation

All control devices were operated normally during the tests. Baghouse pressure differentials (ΔP’s)
were recorded by Kimberly-Clark.

Process Representativeness

The facility operated normally during the tests. Production rates were maintained by Kimberly-Clark
and are not included in the test report. The process is further explained in the Process Data section
of this report.

7
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

Sampling Port Location

Five of the baghouses (#1- #4 and #6) are identical in configuration. The inside diameter of these
stacks is 36 inches. There are 62 inches (1.7 diameters) of unrestricted flow before the sampling
ports and 18 inches (0.5 diameters) of unrestricted flow after the ports. In order to meet the EPA
specification of undisturbed flow before the sampling ports, egg crate straightening vanes were
installed 24 inches below the sample ports as described in Method 5D. The straightening vanes cell
size is 6 inches.

Baghouse #5 and #8 stacks are identical in configuration. The inside diameter of these stacks is 24
inches. The ports are located 30 inches (1.25 diameters) upstream from the next disturbance and 48
inches (2.00 diameters) downstream from the last disturbance. There were two ports for testing.

Sampling Point Location

Table IV shows the distance of each sampling point from the inside wall according to EPA Method
1. Each point is marked and identified with a glass tape wrapping and numbered. These points are
determined by measuring the distance from the inside wall and adding the reference (port)
measurement.

Table IV Sample Point Location
Sample Point Distance (in. from inside wall)
Baghouse #1- # 4 & 6 Baghouse #5 & #8
1 1.00 0.50
2 2.41 1.61
3 4.25 2.83
4 6.37 4.25 5 9.00 6.00
6 12.82 8.54
7 23.18 15.46 8 27.00 18.00
9 29.63 19.75
10 31.75 21.17 11 33.59 22.39
12 35.00 23.50

8
Sampling Train Description
To determine the actual emission rates for these stacks, 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Methods
1-5 were followed.
The sampling train was made of inert materials, (i.e., Teflon, stainless steel, glass, etc.) to prevent
sampled gas and particulate interference.
The stack analyzer used to conduct Methods 1-5 is constructed to meet the specifications outlined in
the CFR. The temperature sensors are K-type thermocouples. Heater, vacuum and pitot line connections are designed to be interchangeable with all units used by the tester. The probe liners
were stainless steel.

Sample boxes were prepared for testing by following the prescribed procedure outlined in Method 5.

Sampling and Analytical Procedures
All test and analytical procedures employed were as specified in 40 CFR 60.

Quality Assurance

All equipment set-up, sampling procedures, sample recovery and equipment calibrations were
carried out according to the procedures specified in 40 CFR 60 and the Quality Assurance Handbook
for Air Pollution Measurement Systems.

9
APPENDIX

A: Complete Results and Sample Calculations B: Raw Field Data
C: Laboratory Data and Chain of Custody
D: Production Data E: Calibration Procedures and Results
F: Related Correspondence

A
APPENDIX A

Table V. Complete Results, Baghouse #1 Table VI. Complete Results, Baghouse #2
Table VII. Complete Results, Baghouse #3 Table VIII. Complete Results, Baghouse #4
Table IX. Complete Results, Baghouse #5
Table X. Complete Results, Baghouse #6
Table XI. Complete Results, Baghouse #8
Nomenclature
Sample Equations
BH #1TABLE V
COMPLETE RESULTS
KIMBERLY CLARK
BAGHOUSE #1
Symbol Description Dimensions Run #1 Run #2 Run #3
Date Date 10/1/2024 10/1/2024 10/1/2024
Filter #7829 7830 7831
Begin Time Test Began 8:07 10:10 12:33
End Time Test Ended 9:11 11:44 13:35
Pbm Meter Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.90 25.90 25.90
H Orifice Pressure Drop In. H2O 1.627 1.501 1.748
Y Meter Calibration Y Factor dimensionless 1.014 1.014 1.014
Vm Volume Gas Sampled--Meter Conditions cf 48.473 46.655 50.344
Tm Avg Meter Temperature oF 53.8 73.0 81.2
P Sq Root Velocity Head Root In. H2O 0.6668 0.6309 0.6779
Wtwc Weight Water Collected Grams 6.8 5.4 4.5
Tt Duration of Test Minutes 60 60 60
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient Dimensionless 0.84 0.84 0.84
Dn Nozzle Diameter Inches 0.2545 0.2545 0.2545
CO2 Volume % Carbon Dioxide Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00
O2 Volume % Oxygen Percent 20.90 20.90 20.90
N2 & CO Volume % Nitrogen and Carbon Monoxide Percent 79.10 79.10 79.10
Vmstd Volume Gas Sampled (Standard) dscf 43.926 40.740 43.325
Vw Volume Water Vapor scf 0.321 0.255 0.212
Bws Fraction H2O in Stack Gas Fraction 0.007 0.006 0.005
Xd Fraction of Dry Gas Fraction 0.993 0.994 0.995
Md Molecular Wt. Dry Gas lb/lbmol 28.84 28.84 28.84
Ms Molecular Wt. Stack Gas lb/lbmol 28.76 28.77 28.78
%I Percent Isokinetic Percent 102.6 100.7 99.9
AVG
Ts Avg Stack Temperature oF 98.8 101.8 105.4 102.0
As Stack Cross Sectional Area Sq. Ft.7.069 7.069 7.069
PG Stack Static Pressure In. H2O -0.18 -0.18 -0.18
Pbp Sample Port Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.89 25.89 25.89
Ps Stack Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.877 25.877 25.877
Qs Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Std) dscfm 1.43E+04 1.35E+04 1.45E+04 1.41E+04
Qa Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual) cfm 1.76E+04 1.67E+04 1.80E+04 1.74E+04
Vs Velocity of Stack Gas fpm 2.49E+03 2.36E+03 2.54E+03 2.46E+03
Mfilter Mass of Particulate on Filter milligrams 0.2 -0.1 -0.6
Mp Mass of Particulate in Wash milligrams 2.9 2.6 3.7
MF Mass of Front Half milligrams 3.1 2.5 3.1
CF Concentration of Front Half gr / dscf 0.0011 0.0009 0.0011 0.0010
ERF Emission Rate of Front Half lb / hr 0.13 0.11 0.14 0.13
BH #2TABLE VI
COMPLETE RESULTS
KIMBERLY CLARK
BAGHOUSE #2
Symbol Description Dimensions Run #1 Run #2 Run #3
Date Date 10/1/2024 10/2/2024 10/2/2024
Filter #7832 7833 7834
Begin Time Test Began 15:03 8:19 12:32
End Time Test Ended 16:05 11:56 14:14
Pbm Meter Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.90 25.70 25.70
H Orifice Pressure Drop In. H2O 2.027 1.067 1.945
Y Meter Calibration Y Factor dimensionless 1.014 1.014 1.014
Vm Volume Gas Sampled--Meter Conditions cf 54.106 40.240 53.724
Tm Avg Meter Temperature oF 78.8 69.8 79.7
P Sq Root Velocity Head Root In. H2O 0.7229 0.6989 0.7165
Wtwc Weight Water Collected Grams 6.5 2.9 4.8
Tt Duration of Test Minutes 60 60 60
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient Dimensionless 0.84 0.84 0.84
Dn Nozzle Diameter Inches 0.2545 0.2220 0.2545
CO2 Volume % Carbon Dioxide Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00
O2 Volume % Oxygen Percent 20.90 20.90 20.90
N2 & CO Volume % Nitrogen and Carbon Monoxide Percent 79.10 79.10 79.10
Vmstd Volume Gas Sampled (Standard) dscf 46.807 35.036 46.032
Vw Volume Water Vapor scf 0.307 0.137 0.226
Bws Fraction H2O in Stack Gas Fraction 0.007 0.004 0.005
Xd Fraction of Dry Gas Fraction 0.993 0.996 0.995
Md Molecular Wt. Dry Gas lb/lbmol 28.84 28.84 28.84
Ms Molecular Wt. Stack Gas lb/lbmol 28.77 28.79 28.78
%I Percent Isokinetic Percent 101.0 103.2 100.9
AVG
Ts Avg Stack Temperature oF 101.1 104.4 105.7 103.7
As Stack Cross Sectional Area Sq. Ft.7.069 7.069 7.069
PG Stack Static Pressure In. H2O -0.22 -0.22 -0.22
Pbp Sample Port Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.89 25.69 25.69
Ps Stack Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.874 25.674 25.674
Qs Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Std) dscfm 1.54E+04 1.49E+04 1.52E+04 1.52E+04
Qa Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual) cfm 1.91E+04 1.86E+04 1.91E+04 1.89E+04
Vs Velocity of Stack Gas fpm 2.70E+03 2.63E+03 2.70E+03 2.68E+03
Mfilter Mass of Particulate on Filter milligrams -0.4 -0.3 -0.6
Mp Mass of Particulate in Wash milligrams 2.4 1.4 1.5
MF Mass of Front Half milligrams 2.0 1.1 0.9
CF Concentration of Front Half gr / dscf 0.0007 0.0005 0.0003 0.0005
ERF Emission Rate of Front Half lb / hr 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.06
BH #3TABLE VII
COMPLETE RESULTS
KIMBERLY CLARK
BAGHOUSE #3
Symbol Description Dimensions Run #1 Run #2 Run #3
Date Date 9/30/2024 9/30/2024 9/30/2024
Filter #7826 7827 7828
Begin Time Test Began 12:27 14:10 15:33
End Time Test Ended 12:28 15:13 16:35
Pbm Meter Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.85 25.85 25.85
H Orifice Pressure Drop In. H2O 1.616 1.607 1.716
Y Meter Calibration Y Factor dimensionless 1.014 1.014 1.014
Vm Volume Gas Sampled--Meter Conditions cf 47.491 47.242 49.852
Tm Avg Meter Temperature oF 72.5 74.5 81.1
P Sq Root Velocity Head Root In. H2O 0.6477 0.6423 0.6661
Wtwc Weight Water Collected Grams 5.8 7.1 6.0
Tt Duration of Test Minutes 60 60 60
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient Dimensionless 0.84 0.84 0.84
Dn Nozzle Diameter Inches 0.2545 0.2545 0.2545
CO2 Volume % Carbon Dioxide Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00
O2 Volume % Oxygen Percent 20.90 20.90 20.90
N2 & CO Volume % Nitrogen and Carbon Monoxide Percent 79.10 79.10 79.10
Vmstd Volume Gas Sampled (Standard) dscf 41.443 41.070 42.824
Vw Volume Water Vapor scf 0.274 0.335 0.283
Bws Fraction H2O in Stack Gas Fraction 0.007 0.008 0.007
Xd Fraction of Dry Gas Fraction 0.993 0.992 0.993
Md Molecular Wt. Dry Gas lb/lbmol 28.84 28.84 28.84
Ms Molecular Wt. Stack Gas lb/lbmol 28.76 28.75 28.76
%I Percent Isokinetic Percent 99.5 100.0 100.1
AVG
Ts Avg Stack Temperature oF 97.0 101.5 97.9 98.8
As Stack Cross Sectional Area Sq. Ft.7.069 7.069 7.069
PG Stack Static Pressure In. H2O -0.14 -0.14 -0.14
Pbp Sample Port Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.84 25.84 25.84
Ps Stack Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.830 25.830 25.830
Qs Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Std) dscfm 1.39E+04 1.37E+04 1.43E+04 1.39E+04
Qa Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual) cfm 1.71E+04 1.70E+04 1.76E+04 1.72E+04
Vs Velocity of Stack Gas fpm 2.42E+03 2.41E+03 2.49E+03 2.44E+03
Mfilter Mass of Particulate on Filter milligrams 0.1 -0.9 -5.5
Mp Mass of Particulate in Wash milligrams 2.8 5.0 6.6
MF Mass of Front Half milligrams 2.9 4.1 1.1
CF Concentration of Front Half gr / dscf 0.0011 0.0015 0.0004 0.0010
ERF Emission Rate of Front Half lb / hr 0.13 0.18 0.05 0.12
BH #4TABLE VIII
COMPLETE RESULTS
KIMBERLY CLARK
BAGHOUSE #4
Symbol Description Dimensions Run #1 Run #2 Run #3
Date Date 9/30/2024 9/30/2024 9/30/2024
Filter #7852 7853 7854
Begin Time Test Began 11:48 15:49 17:14
End Time Test Ended 13:05 16:51 18:15
Pbm Meter Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.85 25.85 25.85
H Orifice Pressure Drop In. H2O 1.489 1.634 1.575
Y Meter Calibration Y Factor dimensionless 1.015 1.015 1.015
Vm Volume Gas Sampled--Meter Conditions cf 44.298 47.396 46.413
Tm Avg Meter Temperature oF 72.8 78.9 80.4
P Sq Root Velocity Head Root In. H2O 0.8079 0.8509 0.8351
Wtwc Weight Water Collected Grams 5.2 6.4 1.1
Tt Duration of Test Minutes 60 60 60
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient Dimensionless 0.84 0.84 0.84
Dn Nozzle Diameter Inches 0.2220 0.2220 0.2220
CO2 Volume % Carbon Dioxide Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00
O2 Volume % Oxygen Percent 20.90 20.90 20.90
N2 & CO Volume % Nitrogen and Carbon Monoxide Percent 79.10 79.10 79.10
Vmstd Volume Gas Sampled (Standard) dscf 38.659 40.911 39.945
Vw Volume Water Vapor scf 0.245 0.302 0.052
Bws (measured)Fraction H2O in Stack Gas (Measured)Fraction 0.006 0.007 0.001
Bws (calculated)Fraction H2O in Stack Gas (Calculated)Fraction 0.077 0.077 0.077
Bws Fraction H2O in Stack Gas Fraction 0.006 0.007 0.001
Xd Fraction of Dry Gas Fraction 0.994 0.993 0.999
Md Molecular Wt. Dry Gas lb/lbmol 28.84 28.84 28.84
Ms Molecular Wt. Stack Gas lb/lbmol 28.77 28.76 28.82
%I Percent Isokinetic Percent 98.2 98.7 97.7
AVG
Ts Avg Stack Temperature oF 100.9 100.8 101.1 100.9
As Stack Cross Sectional Area Sq. Ft.7.069 7.069 7.069
PG Stack Static Pressure In. H2O -0.47 -0.47 -0.47
Pbp Sample Port Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.84 25.84 25.84
Ps Stack Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.805 25.805 25.805
Qs Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Std) dscfm 1.72E+04 1.82E+04 1.79E+04 1.78E+04
Qa Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual) cfm 2.14E+04 2.25E+04 2.21E+04 2.20E+04
Vs Velocity of Stack Gas fpm 3.02E+03 3.19E+03 3.12E+03 3.11E+03
Mfilter Mass of Particulate on Filter milligrams -1.5 -1.5 -0.6
Mp Mass of Particulate in Wash milligrams 4.6 2.8 1.9
MF Mass of Front Half milligrams 3.1 1.3 1.3
CF Concentration of Front Half gr / dscf 0.0012 0.0005 0.0005 0.0007
ERF Emission Rate of Front Half lb / hr 0.18 0.08 0.08 0.11
BH #5TABLE IX
COMPLETE RESULTS
KIMBERLY CLARK
BAGHOUSE #5
Symbol Description Dimensions Run #1 Run #2 Run #3
Date Date 10/1/2024 10/1/2024 10/1/2024
Filter #7855 7856 7857
Begin Time Test Began 10:19 12:08 13:47
End Time Test Ended 11:21 13:10 14:49
Pbm Meter Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.90 25.90 25.90
H Orifice Pressure Drop In. H2O 2.743 2.129 2.315
Y Meter Calibration Y Factor dimensionless 1.015 1.015 1.015
Vm Volume Gas Sampled--Meter Conditions cf 59.229 52.917 55.758
Tm Avg Meter Temperature oF 85.3 91.9 84.7
P Sq Root Velocity Head Root In. H2O 0.6714 0.6412 0.6723
Wtwc Weight Water Collected Grams 6.0 5.3 3.8
Tt Duration of Test Minutes 60 60 60
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient Dimensionless 0.84 0.84 0.84
Dn Nozzle Diameter Inches 0.2805 0.2695 0.2695
CO2 Volume % Carbon Dioxide Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00
O2 Volume % Oxygen Percent 20.90 20.90 20.90
N2 & CO Volume % Nitrogen and Carbon Monoxide Percent 79.10 79.10 79.10
Vmstd Volume Gas Sampled (Standard) dscf 50.780 44.748 47.800
Vw Volume Water Vapor scf 0.283 0.250 0.179
Bws Fraction H2O in Stack Gas Fraction 0.006 0.006 0.004
Xd Fraction of Dry Gas Fraction 0.994 0.994 0.996
Md Molecular Wt. Dry Gas lb/lbmol 28.84 28.84 28.84
Ms Molecular Wt. Stack Gas lb/lbmol 28.78 28.78 28.80
%I Percent Isokinetic Percent 97.7 97.6 99.5
AVG
Ts Avg Stack Temperature oF 108.4 107.3 110.0 108.6
As Stack Cross Sectional Area Sq. Ft.3.142 3.142 3.142
PG Stack Static Pressure In. H2O -0.65 -0.65 -0.65
Pbp Sample Port Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.88 25.88 25.88
Ps Stack Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.832 25.832 25.832
Qs Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Std) dscfm 6.34E+03 6.06E+03 6.35E+03 6.25E+03
Qa Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual) cfm 7.94E+03 7.58E+03 7.96E+03 7.83E+03
Vs Velocity of Stack Gas fpm 2.53E+03 2.41E+03 2.53E+03 2.49E+03
Mfilter Mass of Particulate on Filter milligrams -0.4 -0.7 -1.3
Mp Mass of Particulate in Wash milligrams 1.9 4.0 2.3
MF Mass of Front Half milligrams 1.5 3.3 1.0
CF Concentration of Front Half gr / dscf 0.0005 0.0011 0.0003 0.0006
ERF Emission Rate of Front Half lb / hr 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.03
BH #6TABLE X
COMPLETE RESULTS
KIMBERLY CLARK
BAGHOUSE #6
Symbol Description Dimensions Run #1 Run #2 Run #3
Date Date 10/2/2024 10/2/2024 10/2/2024
Filter #7858 7859 7860
Begin Time Test Began 8:25 10:02 11:54
End Time Test Ended 9:27 11:12 12:55
Pbm Meter Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.75 25.75 25.75
H Orifice Pressure Drop In. H2O 1.961 2.553 2.857
Y Meter Calibration Y Factor dimensionless 1.015 1.015 1.015
Vm Volume Gas Sampled--Meter Conditions cf 51.038 59.284 63.761
Tm Avg Meter Temperature oF 66.4 89.2 100.5
P Sq Root Velocity Head Root In. H2O 0.9354 0.9783 1.1102
Wtwc Weight Water Collected Grams 4.4 2.0 1.2
Tt Duration of Test Minutes 60 60 60
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient Dimensionless 0.84 0.84 0.84
Dn Nozzle Diameter Inches 0.2220 0.2220 0.2220
CO2 Volume % Carbon Dioxide Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00
O2 Volume % Oxygen Percent 20.90 20.90 20.90
N2 & CO Volume % Nitrogen and Carbon Monoxide Percent 79.10 79.10 79.10
Vmstd Volume Gas Sampled (Standard) dscf 44.970 50.149 52.894
Vw Volume Water Vapor scf 0.208 0.094 0.057
Bws Fraction H2O in Stack Gas Fraction 0.005 0.002 0.001
Xd Fraction of Dry Gas Fraction 0.995 0.998 0.999
Md Molecular Wt. Dry Gas lb/lbmol 28.84 28.84 28.84
Ms Molecular Wt. Stack Gas lb/lbmol 28.79 28.82 28.82
%I Percent Isokinetic Percent 98.4 104.9 97.5
AVG
Ts Avg Stack Temperature oF 97.6 99.3 100.7 99.2
As Stack Cross Sectional Area Sq. Ft.7.069 7.069 7.069
PG Stack Static Pressure In. H2O -0.74 -0.74 -0.74
Pbp Sample Port Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.74 25.74 25.74
Ps Stack Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.686 25.686 25.686
Qs Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Std) dscfm 2.00E+04 2.09E+04 2.38E+04 2.16E+04
Qa Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual) cfm 2.47E+04 2.59E+04 2.94E+04 2.67E+04
Vs Velocity of Stack Gas fpm 3.50E+03 3.66E+03 4.16E+03 3.77E+03
Mfilter Mass of Particulate on Filter milligrams -0.1 -0.6 -0.2
Mp Mass of Particulate in Wash milligrams 2.9 2.7 1.4
MF Mass of Front Half milligrams 2.8 2.1 1.2
CF Concentration of Front Half gr / dscf 0.0010 0.0006 0.0004 0.0007
ERF Emission Rate of Front Half lb / hr 0.16 0.12 0.07 0.12
BH #8TABLE XI
COMPLETE RESULTS
KIMBERLY CLARK
BAGHOUSE #8
Symbol Description Dimensions Run #1 Run #2 Run #3
Date Date 10/2/2024 10/2/2024 10/3/2024
Filter #7835 7836 7837
Begin Time Test Began 14:24 15:50 7:47
End Time Test Ended 15:37 16:57 8:56
Pbm Meter Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.75 25.75 25.70
H Orifice Pressure Drop In. H2O 1.714 1.803 1.849
Y Meter Calibration Y Factor dimensionless 1.015 1.015 1.015
Vm Volume Gas Sampled--Meter Conditions cf 47.538 49.085 48.673
Tm Avg Meter Temperature oF 89.9 92.4 58.0
P Sq Root Velocity Head Root In. H2O 0.5361 0.5509 0.5683
Wtwc Weight Water Collected Grams 0.3 4.4 5.4
Tt Duration of Test Minutes 60 60 60
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient Dimensionless 0.84 0.84 0.84
Dn Nozzle Diameter Inches 0.2795 0.2790 0.2795
CO2 Volume % Carbon Dioxide Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00
O2 Volume % Oxygen Percent 20.90 20.90 20.90
N2 & CO Volume % Nitrogen and Carbon Monoxide Percent 79.10 79.10 79.10
Vmstd Volume Gas Sampled (Standard) dscf 40.067 41.193 43.484
Vw Volume Water Vapor scf 0.014 0.208 0.255
Bws (measured)Fraction H2O in Stack Gas (Measured)Fraction 0.000 0.005 0.006
Bws (calculated)Fraction H2O in Stack Gas (Calculated)Fraction 0.081 0.082 0.063
Bws Fraction H2O in Stack Gas Fraction 0.000 0.005 0.006
Xd Fraction of Dry Gas Fraction 1.000 0.995 0.994
Md Molecular Wt. Dry Gas lb/lbmol 28.84 28.84 28.84
Ms Molecular Wt. Stack Gas lb/lbmol 28.83 28.78 28.77
%I Percent Isokinetic Percent 96.6 97.4 98.7
AVG
Ts Avg Stack Temperature oF 102.5 102.9 94.1 99.8
As Stack Cross Sectional Area Sq. Ft.3.142 3.142 3.142
PG Stack Static Pressure In. H2O -0.65 -0.65 -0.65
Pbp Sample Port Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.74 25.74 25.69
Ps Stack Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.692 25.692 25.642
Qs Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Std) dscfm 5.09E+03 5.21E+03 5.41E+03 5.24E+03
Qa Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual) cfm 6.32E+03 6.50E+03 6.66E+03 6.50E+03
Vs Velocity of Stack Gas fpm 2.01E+03 2.07E+03 2.12E+03 2.07E+03
Mfilter Mass of Particulate on Filter milligrams -0.4 -0.1 -0.1
Mp Mass of Particulate in Wash milligrams 0.8 0.8 1.4
MF Mass of Front Half milligrams 0.4 0.7 1.3
CF Concentration of Front Half gr / dscf 0.0002 0.0003 0.0005 0.0003
ERF Emission Rate of Front Half lb / hr 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01
Method 5 Nomenclature
'½ii = percent isok inetic, percent
.I\, -stack cross-sectional area (fl3)
.\~,\P =-sec ✓,\P
l:3tu -unit heat value (British thermal unit)
B", = fraction of water in stack gas
C1 -concentration of particulate matter, front half (gr/dscf,lb/dscf, etc.)
C111c1.,i -concentration of metals (ppm, ~Lg/fr', etc.) atomic symbol replaces "metal"
CO,= percent carb on dioxide in the stack gas
C" -pilot tube coefficient (0.84)
C 1 1."~> = specit;;s symbol replaces x.
C \ tcnrn =-actua I gas concentration corrected to required percent 0 2
.\l I =-orifice pressure drop (inches 1-120)
\H@ = orifice pressure (inches H20)
0 11 = nozzle diameter (inches)
D11 Jcs = cak ulated desired nozzle size (inches)
1.'-.P = stack flow pressure differential (inches 1--120)
D, -diameter of the stack (feet)
E/\ = percent excess air
ER1 = emission rate of front half particulate (lb/hr)
ER,lll111i111 ~ emission rate per mm Btu or ton of fuel etc.
l·R 1 -em ission rate of compound which replaces x
!-.-fact -multiplier of test point L".P to determine test point L".1-1
L = length of rectangular stack (inches)
111!3tu = thous,md Btu
Md= molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis (lb/lb-mol)
l'v11 =-mass of particulate on filter (mg)
M11, -mass of' particulate matter on filter and probe (mg)
mml3tu = million Btu
Ml'= mass of particulate matter in probe (mg)
M, = molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis (g/gmol)
N, =-percent nitrogen in the stack gas
0 2 ~ percent oxygen in the stack gas
✓/\P = average of the sq uare roots of t-.P (may also be referred to as ASL".P)
Pb111 -absolute barometric pressure at the dry gas meter (inches Hg)
Pbr = absolute barometric pressure at the sample location (inches Hg)
Pc; -slack sta1 ic pressure (inches H2O)
1-\ = absolute stack pressure (inches Hg)
P,,d = absolute pressure at standard conditions (29.92 inches Hg.)
0 = time oftest (minutes)
()" = stack gas volumetric flow rate (acfm)
(\ -:,ta<.:k gas volumetric no"v rate (dscfm)
Ow = wet stack gas std. volumetric flow (ft3/min, wscfm)
T111 = meter temperature (°F)
T, = stack temperature (°F)
Method S Nomenclature
T -absolute temperature at standard conditions (528°R) ,td -
Tt = see 0
Vm = sample vo lume (t't-3) at meter conditions
Vm,1d = volume standard (dscf), sample volume adjusted to 68°F and 29.92 inches Hg.
V, = velocity of stack gas (fpm)
V" = volume water vapor (scf) at 68°F and 29.92 inches Hg.
W =-· Width of rectangular stack (inches)
\Vt11c -weight of the condensed water collected (grams)
Xd = fraction of dry gas
Y ~ meter calibration Y-factor (dimensionless)
Method 5 Sample Equations
%1= Vmm1•(Ts+460)• 1039/(0•Y,•Ps•Xct•D/)
-~ A, -cc ( Ds-/ 4) • rr
l3,_, = V11 / (Vmstd +Vw)
C1 = Mq, • 0.01543 I Ymstd
C.1 icuir1-=-C:1a,g> • (20.9 -desired %02) / (20.9 -actual %02)
Dc·q = 2 • L • W / (L + W)
D,, ""' = ✓ f 0.0269 • (Pb111 + 0.0735) I [(T111 + 460) • Cr • X<l • ✓[(T5 + 460) • M5) / (P 5 • t-.P)]}
L::A = (%0~ -0.5 %CO) I [0.264 %N2 -(%02 -0.5 %CO)]
ER1 = Cr• Q, • 0.00857
ER,11111111u = ERx / (mm Btu / hr)
K-foc1 -=-846.72 • D11-1 • L'.'ll-1,;,, • C/ • X/ • Mc1 • P5 •(Tm+ 460) /[Ms • (Ts+ 460) • (Pb,1, + M -1 I 13.6)]
Md ..; co~ • 0.44 + 0 2 • o.32 + N2 •0.28
M, = (Md • Xd} + ( 18 • Bws)
I\= Pb11 + (P<, I 13.6)
Oa = V, • As
()," Qa • Xd • Ps • T,1d /[(Ts + 460) • P51d]
0w = Q, / Xc1
Vm,1d = Vrn • Y • T,1d • (Pbm + t-.1-1 I 13.6) / [l\1d • (T111 + 460)]
V, =-85.49 • 60 • Cp • ✓t-.P •✓[(Ts + 460) / (Ps • Ms)]
v" = Wt"r • o.04715
xd = 1 -B",

B
APPENDIX B

Baghouse #1 Preliminary Velocity Traverse and Sampling Point Location Data
Particulate Field Data
Baghouse #2
Preliminary Velocity Traverse and Sampling Point Location Data
Particulate Field Data

Baghouse #3
Preliminary Velocity Traverse and Sampling Point Location Data
Particulate Field Data

Baghouse #4
Preliminary Velocity Traverse and Sampling Point Location Data
Particulate Field Data

Baghouse #5
Preliminary Velocity Traverse and Sampling Point Location Data
Particulate Field Data

Baghouse #6
Preliminary Velocity Traverse and Sampling Point Location Data
Particulate Field Data
Baghouse #8
Preliminary Velocity Traverse and Sampling Point Location Data
Particulate Field Data
Baghouse # 1 ·
Preliminary
Facility Kimber}y:..CJark '\
N Stack Identification Baghouse # 1//
r ~~} Date 10/,{2-4.
Barometric Pressure
Pbm 2(.9~ in Hg PbP :z { . '-b' in Hg
A-· l Static Pressure (Pc) -1 L g in H2O
Estimated Moisture (Bw,) 0-1 %
Sample Height from Ground 30-40 feet T ~
Stack Dia. 36" Reference: 3"
Comments Egg crate with 6" cell size installedl'.z'. inches uestream of
sample ports
Pons arc 18" Upstream from next disturbance
Ports are Downstream from last disturbance
Traverse Percent Distance From: Ports
Point Diameter ID Reference A B C D E F
1 2.10 1.00 4.00 10 It-
2 6.70 2.41 5.41 It? 6~)1 /ti
') .) 11.80 4.25 7.25 y' y'
4 17.70 6.37 9.37 J/ ~ -~~ 7
5 25.00 9.00 12.00 / 7
6 35.60 12.82 15.82 / 'l'1 .q( J
7 64.40 23.18 26.18 ,;-,,r
8 75.00 27.00 30.00 c; 't(,. Lf'b
9 82.30 29.63 32.63 7 7
10 88.20 31.75 34.75 y /t)
I I 93.30 32.59 36.59 Iv' I ti
12 97.90 35.00 38.00 I/ //
Averages:
L Flow ----
✓L'lP ----
KEY=> I._T_s ___ t.._P_L._F_lo_\~vl
5 Field Data Sheet
Plant: Kimberly-Clark
Date: l0 11~
Travet1ic Time DGM
Poin1 Clock Min (0) (11'1
1 PJ'.();.-0 r::J."t. Io~
2 2.5 L~ ":1-rO
3 5 t.02. 'N!
4 7.5 (.~'{.4.(1.(~
5 10 l<.9.f.>. lL.O
6 12.5 ~~e.1-z.o
7 15 !#°lo. U.O
8 17.5 Coqz..{~
9 20 t,.q{, oco
10 22.5 ICPct1-,{lo
11 25 C. 'l'\ . {.N7
12 27.5 ,~l-<.:\n
1 8,t\ 30 1ol.{o \
2 32.5 1o~.6'-i°'
3 35 1oC. C.'14\
4 37.5 1os,:sc,-0
5 40 7 (0,'\"ri
6 42.5 , \'2..,"{ ,<
7 45 1 \ t.l. <. -;-S"
8 47.5 ll ':} .1.~
9 50 1 \ C\ l.\fl>o
10 52.5 1·u .i1/)
11 55 11.Z.l,6'(0
12 57.5 1ir. e,o
l'\:U 60 1t:J.. ~~
liP t.H r~H,01
(11111:0> Desired Actual
,3'2-l. \ i" l, n
• '\.(1 \.o'Q l."9i
.'3'l-,.~3 L,l,
,'( \ l. "\-:J.-\ -~-=r
1 "l' l,'t~ ,.~"y
• 'IC\ l, -;<, ,.~
-~ 2.. '\ 7.. \ \ .,{ z..:,,~ [ 2,. "\""
• C.."l---1 ,'4o It. .&to
.~L 2-c.l 12.~1
·"'" l.t.s" I.\,,{
·~8 l, ")(. l,,t.
.~{' .C\o .qo
,t(. . "') -'\~
• 2q l.a\-1 l, <>"f
•'l'Z-1,-{1 \,s I
•1{ \.(.( l, C. l
,<3 11.~o 1.90
.~q l.~l 1., \\
• "B 1.,"(~ '2..,'N
.(.() 1. ·l f' i .1-(
,'ll, ),<. < I,'-"J
.'\~ l. ){. \,')C,..
• '!>'l-I,"'-"' l,'l~
"'Jt.8V TETCO
Filtci4" ~ Sample Box~
Location: Baghouse # I
Operator: M. ~M,~~o----
Vacuum Temperatures,.,,,
Cinll,:l Stack (T,) Probe Prob-e Oul Filter Ellluent
7 'l~ 2,.{~ 1:10 Z.'30 2~
2. 't'i -Z.'-":r '1,"M 2-1>1 z.S , 'h' zc.< 1., J l '2.. ") l 1.8
") 'H. 1,C..L 'l'tt. 2.'(L is
1,... ,-=r-ic.o "L{o '2,o 1-'8
1.-~-=r 2.1.. \ 2,{0. 2.{~ 7. f:j
'7 '\:J--l<.J '2.C..\( 1.C..'-t 2.8
'2.. ,~o u.o 2<.,S' U,S' Z.8 ,_ lot> ·u.ct l-{'> 1<+ 1,~
2-loo U.C,. 7..(0 2. {'ti l't ., tco 4(' z. "'i 'Z.c.f~ 1.,
'2-\o I i~r "'Z,(0 2(o 1\ ,_ <tB 'l-'-9i 2:~, 'Z,°}( 32,
L-q~ 2'-.3 -,_ "\U l34 3,_
1.,. 'iB 2<,i, l.'(f, 'L'te> 3'l
1,..-le>O 7. (,,-< "'l,({ 1,(f ~2,
'2-loo "1, c-\ 1.{B 17{8 33
'2,... \oO 'l{'{ 2.~ 2u~ Ji,
2... to { 2.() 't.C.( 'l,.(..f '.)"'(
1,.. le>O U'\ U.(. z.u. 33
i. l oo Z.{3 i~i. ~c,z.., J'-\
1.-lo 2, 1,(2., ''-"' 1C,'f '3$"
'2.. Lo l 1,-( l "7(.0 J..(,o 15
1.. 1<>3
Total 'it, 'fT~✓ ..J H •. 0 ()3~ )=\ .0 -i'u !'}?-7.,
Average_ ..J,~(,(.,~ L<--"Ll-~co-t
Comments: Timelti.P
DGM Temp (T.,)
Out In
~1"' 3'6
1s 1&
'3":J-3,
31 ~,
3q 't'f
'-10 "' 'f'u 'i8
'lZ.. ,,
'-\3 5~
l.('f Sct '{ (p C.'2.-
If~ '3
so (,0
5o t..o
53 (. '1
S.'\ <.3
51.{ '+-:l;f.\ (.~
.5,; Y<)
50 12...
5~ ,1
l.t 10
(..?_ 70
(,~ ,c:,
7.:((4\
5)·'6✓
Page __ \._ol'_j__ Run /1 _L
j
N
A v.
6X6 Straightening vanes 24" below pons
Stack Dia. 36" Reference __ 3_"
Pons are 18" Upstream from next disturbance
Pons arc 24" Downstream from last disturbance
Assumed Moislure .2:1..__%
Probe 1.8 (;, Cp 0.84
Nozzle Calibration ,,, / ~ ·.i.,Y ~ •'2.·0
lo?(.
Avg 00 • l/'1-," inches
GasBag--=-
Console_'--1-/--
Y-Factor ~
liH@ t, SJ't in H,O
Baromct,ic Pressures
Pb.,, 2 ). 9 0 in Hg
Pb, 2 { • S ~ in Hg
Pc -, ( e in H~O
Leak Check: Pre Post
n'Jmin ~ • os:>2-~Oct,..
vacinflg 2.0·v __ft.<)
Pitot Ra<e O •0'0 G) • 0
lnH,O ~.0 .Y,_,o
Water Collected (,,.€
Time Sampled~
Review
K = @T,,,
K = @T,.,
g
min
:) Field Dala Sheet
": I
Plant Kimberly-Clark
Date: (Q~
Traverse Time
Point Clock Min (8)
1 IOilC 0
DGM t,P t,H r~",01
in'1 cinll;C)j Desired Aclual
17~ l'L'l.,.. • 'Z, ti -~, .~
TETCO
Fillcr1 ~1-() Sample Box~ Page -1.0 1:_J_ Run fl C..
uication: Baghousc # (
Operalor: f,\., \A.Q_.1,,,\C, .. ,1"-wA o.,,l 1,)--i
Vacuum Tcmperalures ,-q DGMTemp(T,,,I
(inll1tl Slack (T.,) Probe Probe Out filler Effluent Oul In
L 10 l t.'-l 3 -Z..(,+ 1.,(, ":}-l.{".:1--<., ~s
N Ao
l&
6X6 Straigh1cning vanes 24" below ports
2 2.5 ""1'2.Cl.C..'(0 , 1-'1 .ti -5~ l.. Io(
17 ~1.,qo
2.'i-Z.. ZC.'l '2-C..1 'If c-q (.•~ Stack Dia. 36" Reference 3"
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
• 11
12
~-. 1 t L '. l't
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
ll:~L{
Tomi
Average
Comments:
5 ,?L .. .ctL .C(t( 't.
7.5 "l"l l.~(o'O •2.~ l.o~ l.4)"1,-2.
10 ,~c.f .14,\o .'.\n l.l\ I. ll z..
12.5 "lJC. .l«> • 3't: ,,i(, I. -Z.(,., '1,...
15 I1".1.~,ct:J.o . L/t. l • 'l.n. t•+O .,
17.5 l"l'<e>• o(.{"l •S&{ \.«\<\ l-C\C\ 2..
20 ,'<2..1w -~ 2oC>1-7..o"l-2.
22.5 1"1 I{.~ 7--f -~) It.<.'-I.U '2,..
25 1'1<..bl-( I Cf"( • ~7-t (.-, "L
27.5 1'i~, C.'Bo .... \. I. "l.o l ,1-C 2--
30 lfo. l-~'i • 'Z, "\ -s, . 1, l.
32.5 1 ft.. 1ro • i..,; • <it.. • ~-z.. 2-
35 ,s3.'HO .10 1.ll L.\I 2
37.5 155.L~( • cit-l-. s ( L{{ 1..
40 ":ti":}.~'-\~ -~ J. ""l. "!I l, '.1'1 l-
42.5 1 5cL S\}D ,{C\ L\8 12.1 Pi "l-
45 1<..Z..1.lO .-4;~ 2,.01 2...o:l i.
47.5 ,c.~.c.t<o .5'{ ,.,it ,.,, .,_
50 ,,.c. .<.80 .5'c.t \. er\ l.C\~ )_
52.5 ,,e-~~J .'tf 1. Ll l.<.c. 2..
55 1, o.etc: -~l t,·n L<I ,_
57.5 ,11 .. ~C-c "4l 1. ,, t.,{\ 1
60 1,'-{_ ,,,
4(.,1,,'[ / ✓ l'S. L'-ttt-~L.o"}O
/
✓•"~~" u~t
lol l.'i-::J--
I o'l-L'(l
lo't, 1.U~
lO"l, 2...'\':1-
lo( L't<
(()_.3 u·,
I o( 1.f~
l ~ ( Z. l":1-,co t.c.t"-
lo I 1."f\.
100 ,_,?_ \oj 1,,(,,/
lo~ L<.c..
le'\ t<..:,..
I o7 2~:J.
lo.3 2.<.(
10.3 t(., I
1" "2.. JL.l
lo l 1.C..P
101 -u,,=r
to '2..-L<ec,
lo3 'Z,f,/1
1.'< ~j
1Qt. e ./
2,(,°! U.."\
l. ('1 i~
Z.'fi 'Z,"~
z. 'tS t'tS
"l,Cf"' 'L'4it
2.'{'Z., 2,'4"1.,
1..'-\"l "2,"{'\
2~2. l't2..,
l-'{2, 2,'{7
Z{'\ J.<"'
1.11. 1..?~
z.<J. Z.1't
1,{3 t.f~
1.<"I H'i
-i-<'i ., _.( "t
U3 2,,()
U4 'l.1 <.\
1. 'i8 !'(0
2. c.tl, 1,..'i'
1.'11 2,c.t-,
1...'\'L-1.,'i1.-
Vl.£ 1..'f .O
'iZ.
'it.
'lo
'(o
'-tO
'{ I
40
'40
--t \
$ l
SI
SI
'-1.f
\.(3
4l
"I (
"{ I
I.{ l
40
'{3
l\3
'-ft -
14V Col l
C-C\ '-, ) ,o ,o
1l ,o
1Q ,< ,, ,1 ,, "l tt
11~ ,"{ ,,_ 'l°f" , '\ 1-c
i"\ 17 1) 11-
,'"{ ,3 ,'{ ,3
11 ,-<
11" 11"' ,'f ,~-=r
1{ 1-~
1c, 00 ,~ 1'\
7(. eo ,c So
Ports are
Po11s arc
lio C\ «-\
\
;{ o(\ ./
73.o
Timel~P t S~., OQ...:> e, z,f "":" Mc.A"'-t-.irJ. 6 ,o~ ){
t;t,~~ e •\'.ol--"'-'
1§.'.'.__ Upslrcam from next dislurbance
24" Downstream from last disturbance
Assumed Moisture 0-1 %
Probe -1!4. Cp 0.84
No1J.lc C$al"bra1ion ,, ,, ,,. ',J 'o. _:!.l_ .1,,.> ~ ~
Avg D0 ___:_![ '( ") inches
Gas Dag--=:--'
Console_'-!_,_ __
Y-Factor t • O I I.\
t,H@ \ . ) 0:,-~n H,O
Barometric Pressures
Pb,n -,,..( •~ 0 in Hg
Pb, ?. )• ~ '.7 in I-lg
PG -• ( fl in HP
Leak Chc<k: Pre Posl
n'imin cl> •00 ( 0 . ()() \
voe in H~ Z.&.0 ____8_, U
Pilot Rate~
In ft10 "f, I)
_Q 0
$-0
Waler Collected 5, L\ g
Time Sampled (,0 min
Review
K=
K=
@Tm
@T.,,
~ Field Daia Sheet
Plant: Kimberly-Clark
Date: IO~
Traverse Time
Point Clock Min (0)
1 12.:'-1 0
2 2.5
3 5
4 7.5
5 10
6 12.5
7 15
8 17.5
9 20
10 22.5
11 25
12 27.5
1 l'\:L>.< 30
2 32.5
3 35
4 37.5
5 40
6 42.5
7 45
8 47.5
9 50
10 52.5
11 55
12 57.5
13:_;{ 60
Total
AvcraJ,_c
Comments:
TETCO .
Fiilcr:::1-e) \_ Sample Box~
DGM t.P t,H (S H,OJ V~cuum
4n'1 flr1ll;-()J Desired Actual (inllj!J ,,i .4c9o .3'2,. t,lq \.I~ l-,,,.·uo •'33 l. ?.~ t. i.3 l-11e .~(.:( •1'4 l:Z.1-\,'Z.'J.. 1.. ~.~ •°l<t \.,'i{ I •'ti' l-
18?..c..~ .18 l.'i'L-l, 4( -i, 2... :j ~•f. ::Jt C . .,~ l.1-\ l.+-1 '2..
-iAC..,gl< •'-'A t . 'tf.. 'Z.. 'i~ 'l.. 78~. '1.,.( -~~ 1.1~ 2 -l~ '2..
1C\ 1.-()Z.0 .,, 2.t~ z.~y 1.. 7't I\. (.'-c) ,f,Q i-ict 2,:z.~ 1.. ,,11.ci.o •'II l.i'~ l,{1. 2.
1'f=t. e> )O • '(O \.'-i\ l, 4.fcii '2,.
Bol. o:}O ,is -~ .q3 .,
~2..sz.{ • '2. <{ . s, • 8" .,_
6~.o'\o .~z.. LI ct l,lcy "2.. ~s.cr-<o -4e, I •+ct r.~ 2.
l o'B .01,.:. •) ( L~ri l.C\o 1..
j ~,o.-:~t-f ,Li.. 1:i.l t.~l 1--
j ~(Z..~7~ ,se 1., l <,. ,_ l<P "'}...
tit·:f.,te>o ,L'l.. z ,'\{ 2.1\ 2,.
""81-:;. t vi .55 l .<0-5 1,.o{ 2-e \~.+'10 -~8 1,1-'t l. A-"\ 2--
&u..G° 'll-1 • 'i l \, i' '.\ ,.-:;-1, '}...
~Z.'3-~ • c.{. \ l.{) l,{J t..-
@zj'.q•{'f
5o;3~1 ✓ \~.u,~
✓
'-\L't'S'o
/
✓ -~1-":f9 \,1-LlB
TimelllP
Localion: Baghouse # \ •
Operator: M,cc.,... M,~~ C>-
Temperatures,-,.,
Stack CT,) Probe
j,9"2., ,,,
le>~ Uo
lel., 1{\
t.o~ l.<,o
te, l.<-{
\eCf l.( .. 8
Jee.( u.1
•e'-2.11
IDC. 2.c.(.{
lnC.. 2.,«-\
lo'.:1--2~
\c.s' 2.'{0
lo(, 2,"2..
JO~ 13'
IQ ::f-1-'t't
I "'-=t-)~~
1 ... '+-2C..O
lo9'. 1.c.,
lc:J.. 1,l-9'
lo< )(.(t
lo~ 1((
le~ l.{O
,~~ 1<. l
lttL l"c,
Z.{ )0
\e5 .'{ ✓
Probe Out Filter
ZC:.1-'LC.'+-
lC.f' t<-,
·u.-o ·u .. e
7.'-5 t~e
ifo "t{a
2.. ~(,. Z.<{<,
t..'{l l.'\)
Z..f 2., Z.iZ..
2.'f~ 2.c.t~
l.~ 7 lct
2..}i z.:n
'2')"\ z.,,
z_ '/Cf Z..'41.f
2'1( 1.~')
/..'lf Z.'t{
1.~~ Z'tS
l.'t~ 1.,~J
2.--t{ l~-(
"--n 2'>-:J.
z..Yt l"Yt
t'-{ \ "Co('
1.~( 1~ I
l'i'f 1,'('{
t..'t1" ~ 'f 1
Ellluent
<-1
5~
S'l
52..
'l<t
"I, '{,
1?
.il"l
SI
51
5.3
53
52.
51 so
41-
'\'f
',{~
L((p
"lle 'it
'io s,
DGM Temp (T,,,)
Out In ,-, ,,
,1 17 ,~ , (,
,e, ·'"}j
"lA 1,
7A So ,, Qi ,~ 183 ,~ E'f
80 R.-<
I !Ir. RC, lo 4eC.,
5~ ll.r
~ ....... ~-
f)b 87.
& jq
8'u R'f io ill
8t I '3 .,.,-
Pi 't)f
'8( s~
-w --g+'
8-z. o.-9-:
~?, ~J>J
~t<t-:r
<o\, i.
Pai;c _\_or_\__ Run // _.}__
i
N
B
Ao
6X6 Straightcnini; vanes 24" below ports
Stack Dia. 36" Re lcrencc 3"
Ports arc
Ports are
l<\13
./
..!.!t..._ Upstream from next disturbance
24" Downstream from last disturbance
Assumed Moisture Q:1_%
Probe 3S(r Cp 0.84
Nozzle Calibration
, '1,1 { . i./ { . i,("\ .2-{ ~
Avg Dn..:.ld_'i> inches
Gas Bai;___::-"
Console_~.,__ __
Y-f'actor l, c,1 't
t>H@ _ \, 5-:J-.,n HP
Barome11ic Pressures
Pb'" 1,) .(tO in Hi;
Pb, Z. l. ffi in Hg
PG -• I tJ in H~O
Leak Check: Pre Post
fl'lmin O ,OOZ.. C>.O()~
,.,cinHg_l._El,C> __j_,'u
PitotR31c~
In ll,O ,S_,O
o,"i>
'-\::>
I"'
Water Collected L{ ·) g
Time Sampled (,Q min
Review
K =
K =
@T,,.
@JT,.,
Baghouse #2
~-------------------
N
r
B
A-
S1ack Dia. 36" Reference: 3" -----
Ports are 18" Upstream from next disturbance -----
Ports are Downstream from last disturbance -----
Traverse Percent Distance From:
Point Diameter ID Reference
1 2.10 1.00 4.00
2 6.70 2.41 5.41
..,
.) 11.80 4.25 7.25
4 17.70 6.37 9.37
5 25.00 9.00 12.00
6 35.60 12.82 15.82
7 64.40 23.18 26.18
8 75.00 27.00 30.00
9 82.30 29.63 32.63
10 88.20 31.75 34.75
1 I 93.30 32.59 36.59
12 97.90 35.00 38.00
Averages:
Ts
t.P
Preliminary
Facility Kimberly-Clark
'
Stack Identification Baghouse # )_
~
Date 1 ,.._ l , I .. ... -,_ "
Barometric Pressure
Pbm t...r-'17\ in Hg PbP l C--A4 in Hg
~ I ~
Static Pressure (PG)~ )·)., .... ,. in H20
Estimated Moisture (Bw.) 0-1 %
Sample Height from Ground 30-40 feet
Comments Egg crate with 6" cell size installed J. c/ inches upstream of
sample ports
Ports
A B C D E F
I'}.,. l'r
tv /tJ
'i ~
r fj
7 7
G C7
@ fj
7 7
fl ~
Cf ~
/C/ /()
/tJ F'l,,'--
L. Flow --------
✓t.P ----
KEY => 1 .... T_s ___ t._P __ L._F_lo_\_.vl
s Field Dala Shccl -----
Plan1: Kimberly-Clark
Da1c: lf)/1 f t.'f
Tra\·crse Time
Poinl Clock Min(0)
~ 1 iS'! n,. 0
2 2.5
3 5
4 7.5
5 10
6 12.5
7 15
8 17.5
9 20
10 22.5
11 25
12 27.5
P\ I 1 151){ 30
2 32.5
3 35
4 37.5
5 40
6 42.5
7 45
8 47.5
9 50
10 52.5
11 55
12 57.5
\C,t>> 60
To1al
Avc~ge
Comment$:
TETCO
Fillc.-7832.. Sample Box__A__
DGM t.P L\H {nH,O) Vacuurn
fll1) tir.111:(11 Desired Aclual cin111=1
B Z.C.,1-ecf .1.'l> \.Q'\ l. '° '\ z..,
'Hi§,'>{O ,1.{ . 'l~ . Ci' -z...
hq,~\lo . i l. . q ':r .<\~ i.
e:s1. St'{ • l,{,. • 'i:J-•'t=1-2.. ~1.1(0 • 3'-( \ ·21-1,1.'1-'2,.. ,~ ,Q'\() -'{~ l ,l-l l •+ \ 2.
8~'} .1'30 ,'{8 l .1,Ct l, -:J°I 2.
8)~.,~Q ,~<., ~ •3'1 ( ,~c.f 1-
~'fl. ti'O .. 39 l . c.('t.. ( .... 'Z. z.
t,1/\). 1)0 ·"~ l•:\-{ ,.1-, '2,.
&<f -l=t-0 •S\ l-<;'o l-<to l-
11")'{},~ •50 , . ec. t.8(o l,..
~'{C\ .1,.S'( • ct'{ I .(."I. \.(.4 2 es l.l-'lo • c.t '( l,(.'( l• (. 'f' 1.-8S~-8~1 • "'° -i. .'('1a t.'((, "2-
Sf{g .i'lo .q( 1,:$'i ) .1 <.t "2...
8:sC\ -~{r--.ee ~.is )-1.6 1-
'C>•1.-fqO .i ~ ] • 'f(o 2..~ <i, l,.,..
8L,'-l.5'to •51. l.q~ \.ct'-( 2.
~CL.cno .(,~ 1--fo sz..~o 1.
Bfd=t. 'i8c.: .,~ '1.':\-?.. 1.1z.. 1...
~l-Z-lc.o .51-"J.ol.i:. l°'.oro 7,,
0~5 -0QO .~e, l.2,.~ -,.i..e 1-
'o-i1.,o0 -t~ l'\.1'1-~.\:J-1_.
~8e ,8CO
5'-l, lo~ f i 1 • ~Sbi. ~6 ,l 'fO
✓
✓ .11,.iC\ l ,o1..T
Timel~P
Loc .. 1ion: Baghouse # l.-
Opcraior: M,-.,~ f'\\,~r-l~fc-,.
Temperatures ni
Stack (T,) Probe
le> t 2 '(<.
\c>l i<o
led i.s.,
led U3
Io f l<,'(
lof 7C.(.
lo\ u·q
lo'Z.. t~1
\ C) «.( 2.(.()
1~"(_ t.fa'
JO L{ 2,'{f
lo-Z. t.'(8
I CIO z. 'it.
Cf&\ l..'4.5
~q• 2.U7
leo 2.'-4(
I n I z. '\U
I ,,., .. ,.' ?.)"',
IO\ 1-'t 7-
'fq H~
lo\ l~ \c\ u.-r
ll"\1-Z.C.t..
to I u.e
1.. ~ 2.-:Y --✓
I DI . l
Probe Out Filler
i<.e t.48
1',:1,-t.~'+-i,,: I "t.(C\
1.,N ?{'{
l,{'!, Z.f l
t. {'l it,
l. C.l.. ·u.i.
'l.C.t t<-(
1.1e i,e
1.{'l Z.('\
1 {\\ 1.{t
1.{~ 1.18
'l..(R 1..{~
"l,('\ l.(<i 1f\ z. {ct
?~S? z.H3
2/C .. ?.{I..
,_ (( 1,({
Z.{C.. -z,.(l.
t,(o 2{~
L54\ i.,ct 2,0 2.,0
21, l7_~'t
1-ff, 7_-{f...
Elllucn!
c..,
~f"
C..2.
5'=t
58
5-=1-
5(,,
S<o
SL
515
5'i
5'{
5<i
5<i' ss
5"'-1
54.1
S<i
5'-1
~'(
S"<
~"' ~'i
S'f
Pagc.1__01:_j__ Run11_l_
DGM Temp (l",.,I
Out In ,< 1-,,
i
N
A u
·~ 6X6 S1raigh1cning vanes 24" below ports 1~ "lei Slack Dia. 36" Reforcncc 3"
T~ ,-f Ports arc ,~ 1'( Ports are
13 -r<., ,, 11
,"' ,~
1~ 80
11 s,
'1'{ 8\ ,~ ~",
'll. 8'-' lB.3'-t ,, 'Rt 17 QI 1, 8"l-
1t. j~
1c.. ;. 1{ ~ 1'{ 81?> -,q f>1-
1'f 8'.:1-,~ M ,, 'lo
71 '1{
1>"1--¼
18~~ ..,..
~ Upstream from next disturbance
24" Downstream from last disiurbance
Assumed Moislure 0-1 %
l'robe 3f;)b Cp 0.84
No,.1,le Calibration
, i{{ -1,(( .-z,(c..( ·-V,~
Avg Dn • -z.{<.<( inches ---
Gas 13ag-=:::_
Consolc_'f~---
Y-Factor ~
l'.H@ ~ in I 120
Barornclric Pressures
Pb,,, 2f. '10 in Hg
Pb, 'l(, 481 in Hg
PG .._ II 2 i,:_ in H,O
Leak Ch«:k: Pre l >os.1
fiJ/min Q•~O"t.
vacinlls.12=0
Pito<Ra<c 0 -0
lnH,O !:f.Q
(!). <»2
_\2.,<)
~o
~•Q
/
Water Collected ~ • J g
Time Sampled 4Q min
Review
K ~
K~
@T,,,
@T"'
s Field Data Sheet
rlant: Kimber'rClark
Date: 1o/i, 'Z, 'f
Tra~·e~e Time DGM
Point Clock Min (0) cit')
~: I 1
2
3 -ii:.
" " 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
). 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
t)'.(q
Ir.?_<.
I{' {c~
0 Ul.'i1.<
2.5 ~"3 .,,o
5 18'{. SSH
7.5 '8t1, .o,1
10 4ea,-.,,o
12.5 aM .l.{O
15 Scto. }'-a
17.5 g~2..0(.0
20 ~1.{<.o
22.5 '0'r 1, IJO
25 8,L. .V,f
27.5 !>~8-~to
30 '10o. '}.{c)
32.5 qo 1 -!>lo
35 qo~.C)~o
37.5 Cf65 .Oj'O
40 ~ol..-'N0
42.5 IC\o&:B'&:>
45 '\ ln 515D
47.5 Gct.,f {O
50 '1l'-\.\Z..,"}
52.5 ~h6,.o')o
55 ,,"'l .. tC..c::>
57.5 Cf,, · YiZ.1
60 'f-11. ~t1'
tiP tiH r~H,01
hnll;()t Desired Actual
.-<.\ . ~{" . 'tJ 'i"
. 'i'L-. ,...., -~r
.?iii -~ . c:; C,
•'2., . {,( • <-' .3{ ,1{ ,1{
•5◄ ' .. "\ (. 14
• 'i I. Io l,(O
.. 3,~ • ~'Z ·'di.. . '-I .~t> . is>--i
•"'e 1.03 1-o~
• '5" I.("\
t. '" .53 I , ( ~ ••\Ct . ~"{ . 1'3> ,13
• '3(:.. ,,, , 11
• t.(-PJ 1.0".') l.o3
.{,:) I· 1-f l, '} [
• 7t. l, c.. "\ l. "",
•~FJ l. o".r--l,o":1-
•5o l .o1-, i.o".l-,
.5~ J,2.~ l,2.L..
• c., I h -i,1..., l. ;1.,.
• C,'{ I•)~ l•)9
•l,'t 1.1'0 1,10
I 1t.. 1db ldv
Total 4o-ttto ✓✓ l<,.11z.e
3 TETCO
Filter 7S 3 S,1111plc Box_L
Location: BaMusc # 2.
Operator: : VJ..-M~4MdC---
Vacuum Temperatures,-,..,
Cinllt) Stack (T,) Probe ProbcOu1 Filter Eflluent
')_ ~-:,... zc..< '2,(. ';-'U.➔ 'il-
2 q~ 'U,_J '1.(L ?.<..(.. '(1-
'2,. 'l 1-Uoo 'Z.C.,'4 -U.4 'i~ ., lo,, zc. <{ 2,(~ 7 .(p "':J 2.. Jg(' 2,.3 q Z,{{ 2[f <.1-
i... l "'I 2. ')".} 2.{<f 1.:((1, k:)
"2,. t c"{ 2.c.<1 ?.(~ 'Li"i U.C\
t,.... lO ') l.f'o Z.f t 2--f l 55
"2.. lo-5 "t(. I 1_{3 2-)3 (,O
-z... 101 7/L 7.{'l, 2,~~ G.O
2-I ..o -5' 2(,,7-2,{1-'Z,f1 ~o
2.. I c )'" 2G. 7-·zo i11 too
-:, l 0'1-7-C-l--2 f 2., 1,{) (,0
')_ I.ol-2.( .. 1 ,'fl z.~ 1o I l-to-i.. 1L"J., l,{o Z,{O {. I
'1,. I oC,, z,r 2-<9 Z..Co(.? l. I
"'l,.. I_, "l--Z.(.( t'(~ ?.'f6 SB
-z.. lofo 1.U -z..<fQ 2"'1 .5.'i
1--tol--1.(.5' Z.'(~ i.'ie 5<-
2-I o"< 1t., ~ tfo l..fo 5.', ,_ I oU.. 2-f'r 1.'{, Z-"1't 5"{
'2,.. Joi" z.,4 -Z.'i' L't? 5'< 1-10(, t.{f L'!1 z. '(:}, .s "{ ~ l v 't t-fi '2,'ff ,.,« e s~
DGM Temp (T,,,I
Out In
-.i1---5o
~< So
c..f< s,
t:-o l. I
(..~ ( .. f)
""71-l.>9
(., f} ,o
C..8 ,o
(.~ 13
(. 'l--,3
'°e ,'-'
~~ 11 .
6<r 7~
7n 1(p ,a ?i ,o 78
70 ~?,
lo g7_ ,o S'4
10 e~ 10 8G:> ll ~'.l-., l H1-
'"t' f-:y
rage_\ _or_\_ Run/I 'v
i
N
6X6 Straightening vanc.s-24" below pons
Ao
13
Stack Dia. 36" Reference 3"
Pons arc
l'c>rts are
.!.!!:'....._ Upstream from next disturbance
24" Downstream from last disturbance
Assumed Moisture
Probe 3~to
0-1 _%
Cp 0.84
Nozzle Calibration
• ii:2. , Z..Z'2-. "Z-2-2-. zz:i.
Avg D0 • 'L '1-Z (ihches
GasBag -
Console~ ---1 fz:z_.. Y-Factor I, 0 ( ((
tiH@ _hj_J_'fin H,O
Barometric Pressures
Pb,,, "'Z. )• ':J-0 in Hg
Pb0 2.,,(, (c°f in I-lg
P0 -1 2. f, in H,O
Leak Check: Pre
O'lmin C) • ~"2..-
vae in Hg Jtt
r,,oc R,re O • 0
tnfl,O ~
Post b.~'v
li. •0
.r.i..:_O ~
Water Collected 7... · j g
Time Sampled CoQ min
Review
~-✓
AveraM_c ,J .~°\B_'t
~
\,Ol,~ ✓
i{o{ ./
\ o4,'-l -~i. e ,/ K-
K-
@T,.,
@T,,,
Comments:: Timel~P
~ l,"--t-~~~ ~ .... ;I\ l"\oJ"'lo\t-iS'.2.'i
l-c.~~r ©, t0',08
1+ "~""~'4(\ ~'"" ~ \I>'.\\ 1-, ~"'i f.\,lV--
i(.,<;\.A-%' \\',ev
_5_ ___ Field Data Sheel
TETCO
l'ilter J(a '3~ Sample Box~
l'lan1: Kimberly-Clark
Date: 10~ Location: Baghouse # '2--
0pcralor: ~. ~ 4',\ ~c:>-:
T1~vme Time DGM aP aH 1"'"'°1 V3cuum Temperatures 01 DGMTcmp(T.,)
Point Clock Min (0) cn'i Cil1ll;()J Desired Actual (iull,:) Stack (T,) Probe Probe Out r-ilter Eftlucnt Out In
f) 1 J'U 31. 0 '1'Z:.Z -~ Z.i . 1.Ca . ere. .,c. 2 l.O'{ llf} l{o 1.{o c, '-I 1{ .,c.-:,
2 2.5 ~ z. "'l, 11.Q .z. c.. . c;c, • 'i'Co 2. le~ l~<.. 1.il 251 (.,C,f ,r 1(.
3 5 14 z.. s 'l"'I.( f ') \ \,l\.\ Id"\ 2.. I<>~ t<8 Z-'48 i-~s lo3 1{ 71
'IZ. '1-·'<JO 2.c.-{ l.'<C\ <.o 13 18 4 7.5 , i. e 1-4>~ 1,()3 i. l ()4( -Z.'ict
5 10 cr1, .1't'f .33 ~.-it. l, l.-1. -z.. l ~~ 2.t..1--2.,~ i.(f <.o 1-3 1<t
6 12.5 1~ L.C>')O • c;c., l-'iC\ r .~, 2-ic~ tC.l 2,((tp z, 'f(p :>';' 73 t)O
... 7 15 '13J .ll {' .c.~ 1..6 ( i..:n 'l,. IQ~ U.c., 2,J'{ Z(<.( 5-3 TZ. !;(
8 17.5 'n<..,10 • c.tei l, '1-1 l.+'l-'2-lo\/ Z.C.'( z~ 12-6"'1 5q 1i 7<t-
9 20 1:n .. ~00 .'-l_, h{ct (.;fa, 2-I.Cl~ l.(o 'l.C..O Z.t..o 55 1(, 7~
10 22.5 'il'Vt-i-O • !,Z.. l,. <t 'Z,. l.9t-.L l~L l.'4 9J u..s z.G,,7 55 1 (, ~c,
11 25 ~"12..z,o . C, ( z..i-f i ,'l,') '2-to£. U.o Z.(.z. Z.G, 't SG. 1~ ,,
12 27.5 Cfct 1. c. 'oo . t. '2--1,.ie 1,,-z.& L 1--,-f' t'-( 1,.{'f 2,('{ 58 1(. 8""-
1:1\ ~ 1 I')'. '{If 30 q;'( ,. h,~ . 'It--l•f { t,{(' 1 lo~ ,_c.'f" 1.£.'t, 1,(,?., '-t. 7<t R"\
2 32.5 9'4"t . ''.fo . 'll I ,-5 \ \,( I -z_ lo~ ZC.+ u.-z. 1,(.'2--5't 19' Si
3 35 't{l. l~'f ,5'< ~-lo 11.,, 1-o i,. ''° 1-2.(, z. (, t.. 't-"'Z.. S'+-7'i 8:f
4 37.5 <;:;~. j <.( . .,, 1.stt i,.S~ 2... , ... ~ H"! Z.C.3 t(.,.) f'+-?8 e,~
5 40 '1st.. tLo ,,, t.,'8~ -i...Sq '2-1,L l.{f l. <.1 t.~\ S' (. -,e 8'+-
6 42.5 <\{8 -'t1-0 • c;~ 1,,0'\ , .03 L 10Q, 2-{o i.c.o ~o SC.. 1't t}'t
7 45 ~L. l-"31n I 't~ l•~ L, ".10 ?.-lot 2,)8 1..<.o -z.C,o 51--ze ~A
8 47.5 ,i-~ .110 • S'i 1-'i'C\ 1."t~ "l.,. lo~ l.<f' z., 1 lC..I s~ 16 8':1-
9 50 't(.S. t-,o .l.r, l,.U 'Z.,Ll 1.. laC-2.(. l 'l{f 1,{)r 5-:} 78 BB
10 52.5 'tl.i ,f}( .u. z. ,'-t" 1.. ~'-( l-lo" 'lt;.f 1_,o J_r.o 5':1-1, 05
11 55 l'i1o-1-f0 •'I'\ l ,'i-z, vn .. 1_ 10(,, 7.. (. \ tc.io 1..'-c7 51" 7q ~,
12 57.5 ~~)d,''>0 .,, z.,-i.
~«tl'{ 60 11'.1.'ff;
Total 5>-li.'t ✓ \1·.fl.55 ✓
Avera~ ✓t7\(.{
Commems: Timelt.P
1. ,\}'Z, ")
"{<, • ''l-0 ,/
Ltl{S
\o:} -Z.c.il
i(}~ ✓
loS ·1'
7.,<,o 7L-0 5~ 19 Ql(
~
7<=t-1-✓
-tL:"'i,. d,ow" @.. l5:3o Mo.f~ o? 1o<~ e, \l. '. 4-:t-
'k~ 'i~ ~ l')' , 1, 1--
i
N
Staci. ____
Pons arc
Pom are
1~38
Page I or \. Ru11 # 3 ------
Ao.
,X6 S1raightcni11g vanes 24" below pons
36" Refore11cc 3" -
-~ Upstream from next disturbance
24" Downstream from las, disturbance
I .ssumcd Moisture 0-1 %
F 'robe :3BC,, Cp 0.84
~ ozzlc Calibration ~ -1.Jf' ,'l.{'{ .1,{~ / ~--
Avg D. • 1. f'll inches
GasBat• -
Consol~:~
Y-l'actor l. O t 'j
aH@ \. 'S"r'\ i11 H20
Barometric Pressures
l'b,. 1.-S'° ·10 in Hg
Pb0 'L f .(o <j in Hg
Pc ~ -,'l,'2-inH2O
L, .e.a.k Checlc: l're Post
lr'imin C • ClO 7
vac in Hc...Z..0. 0
Pilot Rate O • 0
tnH,O "(,0
Water Collected
0-oo,
_a.c:>
~
"'.c)
~ .. 6
Time Sampled _Je.Q.
Review
K ~ @T,.,
K = @T,,.
g
min
Baghouse #3
Preliminary
Facility Kimberly-Clark
N Stack Identification Baghouse # )
I Bl Date ty~Jt:7-J,t./
Barometric Pressure
Pbm in Hg PbP in Hg
A-Static Pressure (PG) -,1._q in H2O
Estimated Moisture (Bws) 0-1 %
Sample Height from Ground 30-40 feet
Comments E~~ crate with 6" cell size installed J,-t'inches uestream of
Stack Dia. 36" Reference: 3" sample ports
Ports are 18" Upstream from next disturbance
Ports are Downstream from Inst disturbance
Traverse Percent Distance From: Ports
Point Diameter ID Reference A B C D E F
1 2.10 1.00 4.00 I} l'J
2 6.70 2.41 5.41 II /ti
,
.) 11.80 4.25 7.25 /{! 9 ,,
4 17.70 6.37 9.37 y )'
5 25.00 9.00 12.00 }' 7
6 35.60 12.82 15.82 (/ ,r
7 64.40 23.18 26.18 ,r /
8 75 .00 27.00 30.00 7 7
9 82.30 29.63 32.63 l' j'
10 88.20 31.75 34.75 'f q
11 93.30 32.59 36.59 I{) /ti
12 97.90 35.00 38.00 I'} IJ,,
Averages:
Ts __ _ L Flow ----
6P ✓6P -------
KEY =>1 ._T_s ___ 6_P_L_F_l_o,___.vl
/fl tL Field Data Sheet
Plant: Kimberly-Clark
Date: ~fao!"t.-4:i,
Traverse
Poin1
l!,_1
.?.
3
i
.2.
.§_
7
i
9
1.Q_
11
12 ~1
2
3
4
5
6
7
i
9
10
11
12
Total
Avera!_e
Comments:
DOM 6P 6H <nH,OJ
'--11---.Lf'\\ ✓ ·, 5. 5'-t5\ ·~%.~ ~ ./
✓_~J1,:,-l-1,(.\C-
TimeliiP
ml TETCO Filterlc,u.o Sample Box !\
Lor.ation: 2aghouse # )
Operator:_ ""-'IAQ.,,~~\J'-
~v
<=ti-.o
Page _l_or_/_ Run ffj__
DOM Temp (T .)
In
A6
le:;>
t
N
6X6 Straightening vanes 24" below ports
Stack Dia. 36" Reference 3"
Ports are
Ports are
l7ot.\
~t,\ 81,
71.-. S ✓
~ Upstream from next disturbance
24" Downstream fr_2_m last disturbance
Assumed Moisture 0-1 . ¾
Probe ·MH? Cp_ 0.84
Nozzle Calibration ~~~-~
►'l,1$,. ,:.;JC;. in-clii-J-C'-~ -~-(;-~.-
Gas Bag -"l.f'i') A.J~
Console _'j..._ __
Y-Factor h Qtl.(
t.H0 1.5:£'{inH20
Barometric Pressures
Pbm v('_i,_.. in Hg
Pb0 't{.f.o.\ in Hg
Po -• l'-t in H,O
Leak Check: Pre
ft·'tmin 0, oC2,.
vac in Hg 2,0. 0
Pitot Rate 0.0
lnH,O ~
rru
~ .001...
'1,..0
o.o
~--.i
Water Collected 5 • 0
Time Sample~ (,O
Review
K=
K=
@Tn,
@)Tm_
g
min
/fl fr field Data Shcel
Plant: Kimberly-Clark
Date: Cl\ I 'So h "'(
Traver,• , Time
Point Clock Min (0)
l"l:1O 0
2 1,.{
3 ~
4 --
5
.§.
7
.§_
9
1Q_
11
DGM
(l'l'l
TETCO
Filter ':J 0Z.'1-Sample Box~
Location: Baghouse # 3
Operator. M,~c.,Q.,. ""-f::...~
t.P I t.H r" H,OJ v,euum I Temperatures !'fl DGM Tern (T,.)
'""'°' Desired Actual <••.., Stack (T,) Probe Probc:Ou, Filter Effiuent Out In
0
() ,l
lZ.
'11 11 ,, 1,
ltb~~ 1e
8
':I--
Page __l_or__j_ Run II '2-.
i
N
B
Ao
6X6 Straightening vanes 24" below perts
!Stack Dia. 36" Reference 3"
Ports are
Ports are
.J!:._ Upstream from next disturbance
24" Downstream from last disturbance
Assumed Moisture 0-1 %
Probe J~(-Cp 0.84
Nozzle Calibration J
~1,,{t.\ .1,('\. -'\,{( ... 'l.;(~
Avg D0 ~,5 inches
Gas Bag~
Console I.\.
12
1 ~--11'91·,, 1"'1'•)H ."'"''-'"'"1V ff~ll'--.Q', I''-' 114--ll'"'k I "'"L I ~''.'.:'.I "''.".-11 ~.., II ~~I-""] ,~:r. --'----
Y -Factor l, oL I{
t.Hc -., "\ in H,O -2
3
4
5
6
7
.§_
9
10
11
12
Total
Avera~e
Commencs:
lf+ . ~~✓ l{, L{t{g
/
✓ ,(,,-(t~
TlmeliiP
3Sc,$1-o l'l'J\, ./ -✓
\. ~o1--fol.( b,5°,,.,,
Barometr~c Pr~res
Pbm "Li .e, in Hg
Pb0 2(. 'c" in Hg
Pa f"'• \"'-inH:O
Lc•k Check: Pre ~
G.ee1._
:i_.-o
ft"'/mine-~
voe in Hg ~:t)
Pitof R.ato
In H,0
D·'°
'+<>
c>-0
_!i.v
Water Collected Z / g
Time Sampled {.£) min
Review ..::zr1&
K~
K-
@T.,
@Tm
~_£_ Field Da1a Sheel
P.lant: Kimberly-Clark
Dale: ,C:!ao{1-'-<
Travtrsc Time
Point Clock Min (9)
~ 1 IS'.'\1 0
2 Z,f
3 ~-0
4 -i .f
5 loA
6 ,i..r
7 IS'.O
8 11.<
9 lo,o
10 ,_,_.(
11 i~,
12 n,(
~ 1 ,<..:.t{ 'Jo,-1)
2 31..<
3 ){,a
4 3:1.f
5 ~O ·Q
6 ~i.(
7 '15,c
8 &(:l,,(
9 ~-0
10 52.(
11 i c.c:.-..
12 S1,(
lL~ ,< C.Olt:
Total
Avera_[e
Comments:
TETCO
Filter 78t~ Sample Box~
DGM oP oH i,,H,01 Vac.U'\Jm
{ft') (in 11:0) Desired
(,Z8,':Je2 •JA iAl
~le, t.,o . '}'{ l,1-:J-
~3t.~w -~~ 1:-.~S ~~-~,c •"(0 ,., ()
'-¼,':).t__Q ••H l.{3
'-3i ~-su' • -<,B L.i\o
<r.in. 4\":J.l".> .~') 11,Cf9
(o'4'l .> ~ ."1·\ l. . (.(,
\.'i(. ~1~ tS'2.. l,'t{
~-tS.oi:f . "(q \. %:)
l'l>"tt,8-l.c •Cf =r .... 'l (..
(p5z.. ~~o .. '(,( !,\.'5
w '$' "{._-( 8~ •U 1..i.t
(.fc_ ,'i~D •(e-~ 1.. "{ 'l
4{4'1.'l i!o •10 2.-<.. Z,.
"4 Z.. O~n .1 I L· <.C..
~'f.c..to , t{C, ~':J,l,
(.(.~,flit< .51 ~-,e
Le.a.ct~ ,'2.< .~'{
(.,~.t.{( .'1.l.-• ,1--
1-~2. \'\{ 4'4 #<\()
C--:J-3 .':1-'((' .·2.L. ,q,;..
Golf. ~'-to ~-i~ \.o\
'"+'1--. (i,1"" •2-f •~o
(.;1-8 -55~
'ft · 857.. /4 \ { -~S'-<
✓
✓ .~(,\
Tlmeli\P
Actual (tnll&l
-~\ ,.
r.i~ 3
t.-~s 1
\.,{ 0 :)
l,('\ 'l
l.'24"1 3
12.<ttt 3 ~ 3 ,,,, 3
,. S"> 3
l.-:J-C-3
r.t..e .3
IL?.91 3
'Z,,'f'l-~
Z...<,1,-J tJt. .3
t~l-i 3
Pt8 .3
•Cf'-1' j
-~1 3
,'10 ~ . '\';-3
l,e~ .3
,'=to J
lo\\. \ti~
\,i,,\,
Location: Baghouse # 3
Operator:__J!'.l_.~ wt~~('-9w
Temperatures m
Stack (T,) Probe
'U .. lC.Ct
'UJ t~
qA t{'<
'lfi is,
~~ l.SC.. 60 Z.'{i..
OD 2,.(-Z,,.
lot> !<,Cf
leO l.'fS
IE) ( l.."f ei
lo< Z.'13 ,~ 1. <.<
L}(_ l~
Cf~ lC-f
'l;( i<,e
<ti t<.l--
C ,L u.( ~ ~'l
q"}, u..e
'f:} z..<~
qs l4o
18 'L(.Q
c;-e z.,ct
17--?,('(
~/
~1'-C\
Probe Out Filter
J..&io 1,4.(.:)
2.(o 1..{0
1-<--6' z.c.{
Z.(,.'{ 'C.'1
l.C.( i.e.. (
1-4<-l.41,.
2-{f 7.,{{'
ic.o Z,(,()
U-L z.c.. \
Z.{} 1.(\
7 (q l<'i
1,,'(~ l'(,o
'Z.'!>{ 1.:~(
Z.)( Of
'Z,')~ i:Jf'.)
i<-1 L(,f
2(,,( 1..(./
t-c9 l'tft
Z,((c, Z.{(.,
1,<.2) Z.(..8
Z.:,<. 1.-¼
'Z-'t-Z... L'tZ.
z. (.( -z..<. I
'L(,i, U..1..-
Effiuent
<.<.-
(..(.
L.'l ~,
<-o
5'l
51-
S(o
s~
Sc,
~<..
.5R
55
57
i<)
~a
'£8
'{8
'i0
~~
"(q
ye,
5 l
5'\
DOM Temp (T,.)
Out In
·,-c,. 1< ,, ,<
,(.. 1(.
11 1f!. ,, 1<:t
1A ~I
7~ 8'2-
1Pi ~3 ,, ~~ ,~ Sf
1~ e~
·,~ ~
!o 1..,
.
Bo :~ a., i3'f
81 Si{
ya\ ~ e, 0:?--e, e·~
5Z. ~-a--
82, ~(..
~z. ~:<'
SI Re,.
81 ec.t
JS~~
\.
.,,...
Page _l_or_l Run # _l
i
N .-9
6X6 Straightening vanes 24" below ports
Stack Dia. 36" Reference 3"
Ports are
_ports~_
,;,)
lj£i
.!['.__ Upstream from next disturbance
24" Downstream from last disturbance
Assumed Moisture .Q:1_%
Probe l,g(a Cp 0.84
Nozzle Calibration
·-z.<1 .:i,{':( .!lJ_(_ .1,.;$"
Avg D0~( inches ---
Gas Bag -
Console_'.(....:.........,...._
Y-Factor \. 0 t~
I.I.He _l.. 51 '{ in H,O
Barometric Pressures
Pbm 2,:(, S { in Hg
Pb, 1..(•S'i inHg
Pa • l '"'"'-in H,O
Leak Check: Pre £fill
fl"'lmin e, ~00 l,. O,~'l,..,-
vac in Hg l,e,";) __g_ ..d
Pi101 Rate Cl• 0 C> .~
In H,O _1:.~ "t•<>
Water Collected &; t7 g
Time Sampled (,I!? min
Review ~ '2"4
K= @Tm
K= @Tm
B aghouse #4
Preliminary
Facility KimberlY:-Clark
N Stack Identification Baghouse # l-/
I B j Date 1---2 c? -z-1
Barometric Pressure
Pbm )-J7 @,.) mHg PbP ,;. r, .@</in Hg = A-1 Static Pressure (Pa) -: 1,,/ 7 in H20
Estimated Moisture (Bws) 0-I %
Sample Height from Ground 30-40 feet
Comments Egg crate with 6" cell size installed inches UEStrearn of
Stack Dia. 36" Reference: 3" sample ports
Ports are 18" Upstream from next disturbance
Pons are Downstream from last disturbance
Traverse Percent Distance From: Ports
Point Diameter ID Reference A B C D E F
1 2.10 1.00 4.00 I) 12,,
2 6.70 2.41 5.41 II /C,
3 11 .80 4.25 7.25 "0 ,7 0 /() 't
4 17.70 6.37 9.37 )' ;r
5 25.00 9.00 12.00 ? lf
6 35.60 12.82 15.82 iF,Cf-/ /1-
7 64.40 23.18 26.18 7
8 75.00 27.00 30.00 )'" 7
9 82.30 29.63 32.63 'II I )9'1 9
10 88.20 31.75 34.75 I~ 10
11 93.30 32.59 36.59 II 10
12 97.90 35.00 38.00 /7 /}-
Averages:
L. Flow ----
✓ti.P ----
KEY=> 'Ts ti.P L. Flowl
~-----~
/f/,5: Field Data Sheet TETCO /)
Filter Z f!.>],, Sample Box-U-Page _l_or_j__ Run n_j__
Plant: Kimberly-Clark
Date: 9-) 0 -,_'{ Location: Ba~use # £
Operator. • ,J-r/4.,,19
Traverse II Tirpe ii DGM 6P Jj tiH \"'H,01 II Vacuum I Temperatures(n
j
N
B
Ao
(1X6 Straightening vanes 24" below ports
l
Stack Dia. 36" Reference __ 3_"
'}
i
-2.
6
7
.§_
9
10
-11
Ports are
Ports are
.,, -~I _ _ I .t:/'ff ?/..: l ~SS 11
1~:> II : ,:__-q I 'i'::,'911~1 1 ;:" f: 1~0" J I 1-:~3.I ~ 7: II ~? _I ~? -? } £
1.
3 .
4
5
§_
I
8
9
1.Q_
.!!
12
Total
Avera_!!_e
y~/, J.98~ I !,}!}87-µ. 7'f v Jr1;-9---
-1 o,go77 li~J Lt70,Y
l7J'7
...,/
V _}_ '1 Y.,J
ll-9
18" Upstrea~ from next disturbance
Downstream from last disturbance 24"
Assumed Moisture 0-1 %
Probe zftf ?-Cp 0.84
Nozzle Calibration
,.J:.2:k_ ·/·c,J--. #1-J::.2:...L
Avg D, ,,2:?;1£1 inches
Gas8ag ·da.,/, ~/;
Console Cf Y-Factor~
llH@ / • C} C" H2O
Barometric Pressures
Pbm )-5'. ft_r inHg
Pb0 )..,/: fj<j_ in Hg >
Po -; '17 ' inHp
Leak Check: Pre Post
ft:-1/min I t?t7 '1 ,OC?(
vacinHg ).) licO
Pito1 Rate O~O {7,0
tnH,O L.f1... 71<2
Water Collected J._ ' --Time Sampled
Review
tfO
K~).).,,c./ @Tm
K = @Tm
Comments: Timel~P ,J f"f/(' 1;,-;... '-/,., i1 ~i(,. 7 d v.,..,,1-,/r•ol-,01"'/ul o/-/}-) 7
g
min
I
(fl tL Field Da1a Sheet
Plant Kimberly-Clark
Date: q -,:tJJ-2-,l/
Troverse /I , "j" . II DOM
<A')
6P
(all:O)
A-.1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
TETCO
Filter-----l-E)'"-} Sample Box P
Location: Baghouse # v/
Operator: t2 ,.KJ/--~
Ii 6H ;" H,OJ II Vacuum I~. Tempemlures (1-1
Tola!
Average
c, 7,) yG ✓ ){;, '-IJJ-/ } 9/2-J,. v' )--'--/ !7 v
✓, BJ~y /,6}tf _/_{/U, ~
Comnic,us; Timel~P
i
N
DGM Temp Cf .. )
Ports are
Page _.l__or_L Run# _L._
B
Ao
6X6 S1raightening vanes 24" below ports ~ Reference __ 3_"
!.!r...._ Upslream from next dislurbance
24" Downslream from last disturbance
Assumed Moislure 0-1 %
Probe ,> & G 2_ Cp 0.84 >
Nozzle Calibration
..)::lb.... ·.¾l;k-.Jd::.) ~ I
·e,£L
Avg D0 ,2j-:2::Qnches
Gas Bag , , A--6 1 ;#1;.,
Console ___!:i._
Y-Faclor /-t:7TJ
ilHcl{) 7 inH,o
I
Baromeiric Pressures
Pbm ,Z.[:. ~inHg
Pb. ). r-~ Bq in Hg ,
Pn -:. '17 in H,O
Leak Check: Pre
f ( J. 'I n'tmin I vc?F ~-----·-~· ~ -1
~
] 7 f3 J-{,,,,/
78, 7'
vacinHs1-/, 0 • V
PitotRi!tc O~ Cl
InH,O fjJ2._
Waler Collecled
Time Sampled
Review
K=
K~
C,. 0
{?,{;)
~·Y uo
@Tm
@Tm
g
min
11/5: Field Da1a Sheel
Plant Kim7•Clark
Date: ~JC
Traverse II , ""~ _ /I
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
TETCO
Filter ~ Sample Box__£_
lii-Location: Baghouse # '1
Operator: /;2, J& /,,C<h r'~/. " ~
DGM ii i\.H \"H,01 II Vacuum II Te•~peratures f" /I DGM T;mp (T.,}
Total
v lf (p, ~1 I) ✓ ):o,ov;; )7, Bl Jr1 J-7 t./
!Cl I ----Avera_lle ✓ • 02_,,r; It S] Ml,!
Comments:
•. TimelAP
Page L of_/_ Run #J_
i
N
B
Ao
6X6 Straightening vanes 24" below ports
Stack Dia. 36" Reference 3"
Ports are
Ports are
~ Upstream from next disturbance
14" Downstream from las! disturbance
Assumed Moisture 0-_1 _%
Probe ?fC:2 Cp 0.84
Noz:i:le Calibration
,1::2:k_ . '),,).),... •..2±1.. ...:..22::3
Avg D0 • ).;.. 2-() inches
Gas Bag 4-&£,, ,,4-,;,,
Console 9
Y-Factor ), 0/ J
t.Hc /✓{ J 7inH,O
Baromelric Pressures
Pbm ~ J-~in Hg
Pb" = ~ in Hg
Po -. '-f "7 inH,O ' Leak Check: Pre
n·'tmin • t?c,.,.,--
vac in H£ )./,Cl ;
Pitot Rare
InH,O
tp_O y:-z;
Water Col!ecled
Time Sampled
Review
K=
K=
~
o_ o
fl.O
l.~ 6 g' ---mm
@Tm
@Tm
Baghouse #5
Prelim BH 5
Facility Kimberly-Clark
N' Stack Identification Baghouse # 5
l B
Date 10--I -J-c.l
Barometric Pressure
Pbm in Hg PbP in Hg
Static Pressure (Pa) ~ Cf..-in H20
Estimated Moisture (Bw5) 0-1 %
A,,, Sample Height from roof 15 feet
Comments:
Stack Dia. 24 Reference: 4
Ports are 30 Upstream from next disturbance
Ports arc 48 Downstream from last disturbance
Traverse Percent Distance From: Ports
Point Diameter ID Reference A B C D E F
l 2.10 0.50 4.50 I{; I&
2 6.70 1.61 5.61 tc; I 'I
,., ., 11.80 2.83 6.83 o/ ,6'/1-
4 17.70 4.25 8.25 <f Iv
5 25.00 6.00 10.00 f 7
6 35.60 8.54 12.54 y /tp~JJ-/1
7 64.40 15.46 19.46 er VFl:f
1
/J /
8 75.00 18.00 22.00 /0 y
9 82.30 19.75 23.75 I {J /{,
10 88.20 21.17 25.17 I).., ,1r1i
11 93.30 22.39 26.39 I'),--. I)
12 97.90 23.50 27.50 IY I)
Averages:
L. Flow
KEY=> -11_·s ___ ~_P_L._F_lo_w~I
,/f'/_r Field Data Sheet
Plant Kimberly-Clark
Oa1c /ti -/ ._. )-: tJ
Tr.ncrsc II Ti1:1e Ii DGM l\P
TETCO
Fihcr..2£,22 -S ample Box__!;Z_
Location: Baghouse # 5
Operator: t2, Ju 7al e {--, I ; ;
II l\H \n H,OJ II v,ruum II Tcn;pcr.u11rcs ffl II Dmt Tfmp (T ml
!'age _J_of_/_ Run H_l_
N
i B
,H/
Stack Diameter 24" Port Reference 4"
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Total
Average
Commcrits
yy,·;.1-r ,, IC/!'-!! vu.s-Br p o I v
✓ J_J__/ lf ) . 71/} Iv 8, '-I
Baghouse llP
time I Reading
'"-
Ports arc
Ports arc
lltl --~-
'1.!Z.1' .J (,.,/
??fi)
lQ.:__ Upstream from next disturbance
48" Dom1s1ream from last disturbance
Assumed Moisture _0-1 "lo
Probe k2.J!f Cp 0.84
Nozzle Calibration ,z ~ I ~ . ):to ~ O
Avg D,, , ),,fi $inches
Gas Bag ambient air
Console_!:{___
Y-Faclor ~..,J-
llH@ j,__ /[_ 1J in 1100
l.,e3k Check:
fi1/min
\.IC IJl Hg
P1101 Rate
lnll,O
Barometric Pressures
Pb,. J:J'-V in Hg
Pb, P-;_ 0 in Ilg
I'~.-• (i ~;;--m I 1~0 --..
Pre fZ't
, t'lo7 ,--Z:,o J-
Jd I(} r, {?
01-0
ffl,O
cz..:....q_ e.o
?J-
Waler Collected tf'. 0 £
Time Sampled ___ £f:,i__ min
.lH@
Flow Rate _________ eClmin
K ~,/'; ( 7 @Tm gy
K::. @Trn
1/1-..r-f-ield Data Sheet TETCO
f-iltc,2~3 Sample Box__e_
Plant: Kimberly-Clark Location: Ba2?,use # 5
Operator: = E>,l--ct. ",r1 Date //J ~/ -)</
Tr»<<>< II Ti1~1e ii DGM llP llH (~H,O) Temperatures 1·•i
3
4
_Q_
6
7
8
9
10
11
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Total
Avera_£e_
Comments:
✓ -t.J., 917 ✓J.J'.}_880 £/0 i }-J7) V
✓ , r lf 1;,. 2 ,; ). r --11!7.,;
Baghouse t\P
time IReadinq
Page _/_or._/_ Run #...:::t_
N
DGM Temp (T.,)_
r B
%
Stack Diameter 24" Pon Reference 4"
Pons are
Pons are
J,l?}.
l,{ lf I). t./
UJ
lQ:.'.__ Upstream from next disnirbance
48" Downstream from lafil_ disturbance
Assumed Moisture 0-1%
Probe ),-...2_/;_ Cp 0.84
Nozzle Calibration
,2Qj.2.£J..HP---2:20
twg D0 •?tz Yfi~hes
Gas Bag ambient air
Console ____j_
Y-r-actor // r;:?t'J<-
llH@ ~~,o I. C _) 7
Leak Chock:
Barometric Pressures
Pbm _J:d:;. 3/ 0 in I-lg
Pb,L~inHg
PG -• U/'-in H,O
Pre
ft'imin , t/OJ-~ I
1 00
_z._o ,ac in Hg )-/, 0
Pltol R.tte Cl-CJ CJ. cJ
In H,O 8-o ff<V
Water Collected f??. Time Sampled
Flow Rate
g
min
~H@
cc/min
K -'-/, 8 6 @Tm E, 7
K; @T,,
If!,) Field Data Sheet TETCO
Filter 7tl D Sample Box P Page _J_of----1--Run M~
Plant Kimberly-Clark
Date /t/ --'/ -J-'<f •
Location: Bagh,&e # 5
Operator: fu £1,,,k?<! 7
Tr.n«sc II . ";--II Time
Point
DGM
,.,,)
l'IP
(in llf))
N
II l'IH ;• HcO) II Vac.um I.._ _____ Temperatures ('F> DOM Tem~frml r Bo
y
Stack Diameter 24" Port Reference 4"
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Ports arc
Ports are
• I "-'I I T /rJ II /V I .z I V II ,c:;~·:,-!I ·r II 22 I • V O -II-h II / V 7 ..,.,,.. I'/ I cY ✓ I I I .. I II l1/ r I ~ L h. (? ..}-'I ,r--:---, J,1//"~ ---,11 ,~1 I -A)-.. -;. -,. /4 1. _,,,,,,-..., / ,,,_ ~--;,;>~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Total
~"•r~e
Comments:
»~, 75'g v _,.,,
✓_Lr;_,_;J Jc) .J)-:,}T ) 6 J 7
✓ I t 7}) -21.! J-_jj O' 0
Bag house l'IP
_ti111e !Reading
v-"/tY6{ V
9'/.7
~ Upstream from next disturbance
48" Downstream from last disturbance
Assumed Moisture 0-1 %
Probe J;Z..G._ Cp 0.84
Nozzle Calibration
:2:..il d:.li .2Z.t? . )-70
Avg D, ):6"-?J inches
Gas Bag ambient air
Consol c --2..__
Y-Factor /, C7 /.F"
IIH@ )c ~ ,> ?n H,O ;
Barometric Pressures
Pbrn 2J'. f O in Hg
• -~ Pb, )-,) • ~ in Hg
Po , -. 6£/-in H,O
Le.ti< Check: ~ Post
ft'lmin r OOT I 00 /
,-.c in Hg }:/ -2. 0
O~O 0. 0 Pilot R.:t.1c
lnH?O 8.t:2. /60
Water Collected f:·~ Time Sampled
Flow Rate
g
min
aH@
cc/min
K~ '-1, 66@ T,, Y7
K -@T,,
Baghouse #6
,---------------------,
N
I B
A -
Stack Dia. 36" Reference: 3"
Ports arc 18" Upstream from next disturbance -----
Ports are Downstream from last disturbance -----
Traverse Percent Distance From:
Point Diameter ID Reference
1 2.10 1.00 4.00
2 6.70 2.41 5.41
'"I :) 11.80 4.25 7.25
4 17.70 6.37 9.37
5 25.00 9.00 12.00
6 35.60 12.82 15.82
7 64.40 23.18 26.18
8 75.00 27.00 30.00
9 82.30 29.63 32.63
10 88.20 31.75 34.75
11 93.30 32.59 36.59
12 97.90 35.00 38.00
Averages:
Ts
t.P
Preliminary
Facility KimberlY:.-Clark
Stack Identification Baghouse # /4
Date l._v'-}--'J-'-I
Barometric Pressure
Pbm in Hg PbP
Static Pressure (P0) -, 7 "/ in 1-120
Estimated Moisture (Bw,) 0-1
Sample Height from Ground 30-40
Comments Eoo crate with 6" cell size installed
sample ports
Ports
A B C D
r ',I 'J-
/I I"
'1 /v
¥ o/
7 ')
C, / ;-~ 6
7 jl
I °!
/(J /t
I/ Ip
)) 1'1
L. Flow -------
\lt.p -------
KEY=> ITs t.P L. Flowl
L.._ _____ ____.
in Hg
%
feet
E F
~Field Data Sheet .;-g ETCO
Filter ,Z ff, Sample nox ______£_
Plant: Kimberly-Clark
Date: It/ -),. -)--c./
Location: Baghouse # f; Ii. ,
Operator: ?J, , ,4 .,_, t'j:
Tr.,vcr,c II Ti~1e Ii DGM ~p 6H f~H,O) Temperatures.-,., II DGM Tcm.e._tT,.,I
3
4
5
6
7
.§.
9
10
11 _g
p_
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Total rt, oz 8 ✓ 1J., L1.m;. ~MG V ")-J,'i} ✓ 1/ 96
C( y Avcra.le_e ✓ I f3.>-y Li_6 I Cf 7, 6
C'ommc-nls: Timel6P
Page _J_of_j_ Run//~--
i
N
B
Ao
6X6 Straightening vanes 24" below pol1s
Stack Dia. 36" Reference 3"
Po11s arc
Po11s are
.!./'!l
Ill} -_,,_
.__......,
18" Upstream from next disturbance
24" Downstream from last disturbance
Assumed Moisture 0-1 %
Probe 1.ff_G_ Cp 0.84
Nozzle Calibration
, Hh_ • kjd.. ~ ..J::k..J
AvgD~~ • inches
Gas Bag dmJ , ,4,).
ConsoleJ..
Y-Factor /1 (7 /)-
t.H@ /. il.1.. in H2O
Barometlic Pressure~
l'b,., ) J: 7J'-in Hg
Pb0 ,J-.,f'-: 7 'f in Hg
PG -A ~ in !!20 -' 7'1
Leak Check: Pre Post
./7t? l fiJ/min >
v,c in H~ _2::1! (?
,oOO
,,>. 0
Pitot Rate-
lnH,O
0.0 ~ ~ ~o
Water Collected 1.,,4 cf g
Time Sampled { 0 min
Review
K = ) V / r; @T,., C ,,>-
K= @T,.,
Atf ~ Fidd Oa1a Shcel TETCO -
Filt~r_Z£?~ Sample nox__.L
Plan1: Kimberly-Clark
Oa1e: /t/ -k~ ).. '{ Loca1ion: Baghouse II i:
Operator: /Z. )(t -:4. I"/¢
lrn=II Time I . Poin1
DGM
CA'I
6P
(a ll~J•
II 6H r""'°' ~ Vacuun, ~ Temperatures n1 II OGM Temp (T .,l I I I I
i,1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Page _/_01_· _I_ Run 11_?
i
N
B
Ao
6X6 S1raigh1cning vanes 24" below 1>orts
Stack Dia. 36" Reference 3"
Pons are .!Jr__ Upslrcam fi'om next dis1urbance
Pons arc 24" D0_1vns_1rcam from la_st dis1urbance
Assumed Moislurc 0-1 %
Probe .}.t!t:'
// J tj N012le Calibralion
Cp 0.84
✓ ,J..eh__,)+k:.2±2. ~
Avg D,, }r}--C/ inches
GasOag .&n,.,. ~~
Console 'j
Y-Faclor ~
~--
2
3
t.H® /t~/"'J nH,O
:._ll I .J.:.o 114 v , 2 /U F' Iv a1V: "v I.,... '/V' ~ ,) II 7 z V7 ~ I \ IP / I .> 7 ~ 7 y I o (z / 2:..} --7__ ·sarometri;P,essurcs ;, • ~ 'n ,,. '.>! 1 i -_.,, ,..1. • --,,_ I ' ----... Pbm ZJ~ 7 J-in Ilg
4
5
6
7
1
9
1Q
11
12
Tomi
--_../ 51,;. ey v ).} r vftf3V 0 /t )6 p.-"J <ii)-. C./
A\'crage ,/ I f 7 f}J., -/ ,,
Comments: TimelaP .)j-1/1.,,./ tf) /o;g I In
Pb0 Z..,J"; 7 q in Hg
Pc • ..:., 7c./ inH,O
Lr:.t\ Ch«k: ~
fi'hnin , (2C/?
f2fil . c:,c:7 I
_ / k 9) ..., vncin ll~_h,.{7, (/ 7. 0
l'irocR>1c (Y. 0
v/}-9'/
/?f✓ )-
1,../
i,,.,,-e,/fj /v,,.,,,~
lnll,O &'.CJ
Waler Collec1cd ), Q g
Time Sampled f CJ min
Review
K =2. 2,-f @T.,, e..5~
K= @Tm
/ t,.; j (; ?) ,,J w' r I C'vf;
/V'/L_ Field Data Sheet
Plan1: Kimberly-Clark _
Dale: l{f---) -),, i
Traverse II Time I.
Poin1 4 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DGM
-h ,.. ;TJ:TCO
Filler~ Sample Dox_____e___
Loca1ion: B:et1se # %;
Opcralor: . ,& hv,t
Tempcralures n 1
Page -Lor_l_ Run ff_;)
i
N
B
Ao
6X6 S1raightening vanes 24" below ports
Stack Dia. 36" Reference _ 3"
Pons arc 18" Upslream from next disturbance
Ports are 24" Downstream from last dis1urbancc
Assumed Moisture 0-1 %
Probe ~ Cp 0.84
Nozzle Calibration
,.l:;J¾_ •,W---.~ _._2:k/
10
11
17..f;_ r Avg D. I cE-0 inches
~ /I I "-"--O ll/~Z:./~l;',..ll~l----+-ll (4(/ l'2·.1:1 { ,~~JI &7",f 11/~{1 .t'.:'£.---GasBag ,4¥ Ji),
Consolc _ ___.l~
12 {~
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1Q_
11
12
Total
-✓ IP8.7G c ], 7 r-; -1 ,l:C, c</</A 9 71)-)--y 16 i,,/
Avera.!1_e -1 h//C7J-2:· g >7 1t20, 1
Commc-nts: TimelAP
Y-Factor /. C//,J-
AH@ j { } 7 in 1·1,0
Barometric Pressures
Pb.,, ) ,f": zr in Hg
-Pb, )-P. 7 c.f in Hg
P0 -> J cf in H2O
I.ca, Check: Pre Tofil
_!-j,zC/
c; Brlf v"'
f_£c2_:)-
n>/min l Ot:71/
v,c in II~ r /,{.J
Pitot R31C Ov 0
JnH10 l,te?
• t;?c?/ G,&
~ .. o
!:J.o
Water Collected /i ).... g
Time Sampled f O min
Review
K =
K =
@T.,.
@T..,
Baghouse #8
Prelim BH 8
Facility Kimberly-Clark
N Stack Identification Baghouse #
I Date /c:7-J.-). i
Barometric Pressure
Pb"' ;-.r, l f '-in Hg Pb1, ,?-.,,r, 7c./ in Hg
A-·I ) Static Pressure (PG) -. )"U. inHzO
Estimated Moisture (Bw,) 0-1 %
I Sample Height from roof 12 feet
B
Comments:
Stack Dia. 24 Reference: 4
Ports arc 30 Upstream from next disturbance
Ports arc 48 Downstream from last disturbance
Traverse Percent Distance From: Ports
Point Diameter ID Reference A B C D E F
1 2.10 0.50 4.50 /.,h-I?
2 6.70 1.61 5.61 'J /''f
3 11.80 2.83 6.83 lj_ //
4 17.70 4.25 8.25 'lt7);3 s /t y
-'f ~ 5 25 .00 6.00 10.00
6 35.60 8.54 12.54 lvr,"]~7 ;-
7 64.40 15.46 19.46 /0/ I °?-r1 7
8 75.00 18.00 22.00 )" y
9 82.30 19.75 23.75 / 10
10 88.20 21.17 25.17 It?/ I/ ,l/T I J,-
11 93.30 22.39 26.39 /,I I
12 97.90 23.50 27.50 It 17
Averages:
L Flow ----
✓.1r ----
K.EY => ITs t.P L Flowl
.__ _____ ___,
,,t!LcL.. Field Daia Sheet TETCO
Filter 7f!? lr"s,mplc Bo,_A_
Plant: Kimber~lark
Date / ..,.k!:): (..,(
7
Location: B?Zuse # ~
Operator: ,J( ¼h Ctn
Tr,,crse II ' ";·~ ... II Time DGM liP
N
(ft')
ii liH r~►<,O> II V,cmun II Tempcraturesrr, lj DGM Temp(T.} i
1)7/0ir • 'l+':.Gt:l-l~Jlfl,•rwp1.,v 111'1.f::lf'l?::j' J 111vr ID'h l ~ 1.c (Vllz ....-II s.-,21u 1 --------, ..._._ ---r.-~ I-~ I -~r-z--"1 , /-.., i,, , .._ _,... ,,,,. . -/',# ~
._/
Total
Average
-._/
'1 7, ;--; a ,J I), f/f'o<? _1/_/) :rs> 'f
✓ ,n_? .J.:.Jl. 1 ~ '( &
l,()_lc V
eL9
!'age _/_of __ !_ Run ;; __ /
Ao
I B
24" Pon Reference 4" ~ Upstream from next disturbance
48" Downstream from last disturbance
Assumed Moisture 0-1 %
Probe 2:_J b --Cp 0.84
Nozzle Cillib:-ation
i):,LJ .:r.1'i .J:fJo ~o
Avg D,, ,}-?Ci:,/inches
Gas Bag ---d:..tv/ /e-r I 4-1).
Consolc_2.,__•
Y-Factor /, 0/,,/-
liH@/r /J ?nH,O
::::;;£¼~ in Hg
Pb,_.)=, • mHg
PG ~, J,-0 inH,O
L<,k Ch«k: Pre
fl'lmin ..J...t:!i2_t(
v:!c in Hs ~
PitOl Rate
lnH10
(Y.,O
fl.o
erO
fL_Q_
.3 Water Collected---,,-..,,.,,----g
Time S::u:nplcd f (} min
OH@
Flow Ra1e _________ ccJmln
K =/', 7.} @Tm 7' /
K = @T,n
Comtnenl!i Baghouse liP
time I Reading /f°/1.~J& r, If
/'1 J--9
I '1 'lo/
--91/t,.;wr:. h(/1.,v
I I II ,.,f-~.,c( rt;/(vrl-z:.d /f /'l.J/
;t,1 .. r/ I
I 1 //
I I • I
( I • I
,s-10
I )-o--
l.f')-9.
,,
/ I
I (
fl r,
t I ,,
ti {{
) ,, ;_rl;z_. ,1
I I ;.;/f/ ti
I • I (1 1,,r-) I
,t!J___tL.___ Field Data Sheet JETCO
Filter J8'} {, Sample Box_t!.__ Page _!_or _ _!_ Run fik
Plant: Kimberl/Clark
Date: t/ -)-.-m Location: B,ouse # f'
Operator: , It/ 1/o-,Z ..;._, ,
Tr.nc= If • ··;·: .. __ .II Time DGM
(I\')
Ll.P
(inllrOJ II Ll.H tnH,<>> If V•ruum II Temperatures,.,., II DOM Temp (f,.)
I I I I I I Oven I Emucnt II Out In
N
r A 0 I B
4
5
'Stack Diameter 24" Port Reference 4"
Ports are 30" Upstre::un from nex1 disturbance
Por1s are 48" 00\YIIStream from la.st disturbance
Assumed Moisture 0-1 %
6
7
Probe J, 7 G 2., Cp 0.84 >
Nozzle Calibration
8
9 !.....ll2. ~ 4Z.__!Z~9
10
11
Avg D,~u ,9 ,es
GasBag~ d/:...
Console 9'
Y-Factor /, 0/ J~
l'lHo ;, o ,z in H,O
Baromctri c Pressures 3
4
5
Pb.,~-Pb,~
Po -,. )-0
in Hg
in Hg
in H,O
6 V L<,k Ch«k Pre
7 0 ~-~9
8 ~G n cinHg ),-/,C/ /l/ 7 -
9 --
10 PitotROlc 0-0
11 In H,O ~f3'c 0
12
Post
I otJ z..
tD. 0
o .o
K-zJ
Water Collected '-I • j g
Total
Avera£c
Comments:
7 v} 7, '-"
'1 rr CJ[JF ✓ J JJ)J,.C ~ )9Cf v-'L( '-I 23 ._,,,,.,,--
,, JLC/ r Lt 0 o J _J_pJ, er V-c;
.Jr71µdP /r.r6, rc-..J/--or/~~ t? ;.r..r-c;
,, ti !FOJ,..I 1 1 ,, 16V</
Baghouse l'lP
time I Readi~
I(
Time Sampled _ .e....t:2.__ min
<IH@
Flow Rate _________ cc/min
K =
K =
@Tm
@T,.
/· I
1t ~ /(p 'J,/ If /I t (,, ).... )
, 1 1 G ~tj""I , , , , , fl...!:t:::t' 1 F .J7
.t"/ ,L Field Data Sheet
Plant: Kimberly-Clark
Date: /() -) -): 9
T"'er" II Tim~,
--Min i8}
DGM
(~·,
I) ;
3
4
i
6
I
8
9
10
4
5
IIP
(NIIIP)
TETCO
Filtcr..;?_f2_1J Sample Box_E__
Location: Bahouse # e
Operator: /i// /.e /4 (-4
6H (riH10) II I II Yocuum I,_ ___ --Temperatures c"FJ DGM Temp (T,.)
In
Page_l_or_J_ Run ii _ _2
N
r Ao
I s
Stack Diameter 24" Port Reference 4"
Ports are 30" Upstream from next disturbance
Ports arc 48'' Do\mstrearn from Jast disturbanc.e
Assumed Moisnirc 0-1 %
Probe J:l G Cp O.B4
7;t.;,. Nozzle Calibration /.# \..,.:.>.r, 'f./CJ , 2.7r ~7e; ---~ J!!._I_ .. ,_.t7C/_. __ ,'(7 , ./ r
;\vgD,~✓ 1 ")...7 L..r-._
Gas Bag ,dj'(t;)/ 4 I ,r -
Console~
Y-Factor 1 (7
IIHo fr J,Z in H,o
Barometric Preif _
Pbm 2.r. t11Hg
Pb~--2:.L in Hg
Po -.J,,.Q inH,O
'1. -,, Le,k Check Pre E9J.l, / '.r t-=-~'"-"--i 1 /j , fj ?-Z--'t--:!:::--7--f-L..---''---'-f--+--+L..c...."-l-~--I .> • 7 n '!min , V C1 J'-f /1/v' j6 ·,-• V / f II v '
<t'Z. ~+--c:,....=..., I • 7-~;:;:-::;.-f:-'::-"'-t-t--t~::'-l-~:--1 o J /J-J,8 ,·,cinHg r /, c? ;f. O 0 -----
10 .,. J I I I J ---. -t---''::---'7-r.L..-'.f"=:.1:-¼-1-.L.L...-=J-...L.L,....j: -.. ;f J B
Pilot R3l0 ao B,o £!JL a.,__a 11
12
Total
b V V
'-f !I, G 7) ✓ ~'J.t '10 I '1'1 I Jg / )-£8 1./"'
Average -1 0. J'"G YJ --1!.!d._1 f Cf½ I
Comments: Baghouse LIP
time I ReadiQ!!__ J fr, //-tt ti ~
'( I (
e : c,.r
g-: II
I/ fl tJ.7
I/ I I 6 :3 I
J.--l g <-f
)tf, 0
,,, t:./ //;/ /e-ti &
I ( ,I
I( ,t
II fl
r_,..---
0 :o (,
8 :'Y
{J!J-'f;
(! :J 'i
lnH,O
Water Collected 5 · '-i g
Time Sampled ___ 6_. ~ min
OH@
cc/min Flow Rate Y!;:i!
K~ ' @T"' ?O
@Tm K~ y

C
APPENDIX C

Baghouse #1 Sample Recovery
Particulate Analysis
Gas Analysis Data (ambient)
Baghouse #2
Sample Recovery
Particulate Analysis
Gas Analysis Data (ambient)
Baghouse #3
Sample Recovery Particulate Analysis
Gas Analysis Data (ambient)
Baghouse #4
Sample Recovery
Particulate Analysis Gas Analysis Data (ambient)
Baghouse #5
Sample Recovery
Particulate Analysis Gas Analysis Data (ambient)

Baghouse #6 Sample Recovery
Particulate Analysis
Gas Analysis Data (ambient)
Baghouse #8 Sample Recovery
Particulate Analysis
Gas Analysis Data (ambient)
Chain of Custody
Baghouse #1
Method 5
focility: _____.__h__,,,};,i-~~-~....,+fi_l_?___._/_cr..,___'/%_.__, __ _
Stack lch;ntilication: ,th tl:-
!)ate: Io/ I I z..y_ __ ___,_..__ _____________ _ Method: 5
11\IPINCJillS
Run:
Fiil1:r Number: lmpinger Number
..1... 1 3 1 4 1 5 6
Initial Volume of liquid (I 120 ) in impingers. (ml)
100
Total (g) i · €J ==c=========
Filt1:r Dcscription J1 # fl"" 17 ~
Silica Gel __ }<✓....::'=('1-----<'4'4/:...=Z:::-.L/__,_/_,___
11\lPING.ERS
l{un: L. Sample Box:--,/-'-'} __
Filter Number:
2
Impingcr Number
3 1 4 1 s 6
Initial Volume of liquid (H,O) in impingcrs. (ml)
100 I 00 I I SG I
' ,~::::::::#~~ p%~[l61JJ:'.-l~fY I
Nct (gJ -;1_ _ 7-• '"':__ . / . 0 _ _ .1-_
Total (g) 5 · '-\
l'iltcr Dcsniption y? / c/1)' M1
Si I iea Ciel -----'lq+---"J4"-~·/._.£'....,c'----A...--
1M£lli.GERS
Run: 3 ----Sample Box: __ C.. __
Fill..:r Number: lmpmger Number
2 I 3 1 ..L 1 s
763 \ Initial Volume of liquid (I 1,0) in impingers, (mil
Total (g) ========
Fill1:r Description __ ,...n....;...,a.r __ V_l.:;;_~ _ __,/f!'---½_
Silica Gel h /,,? /#' r ------","'l-----'r7"-"-_..;._ __ _
6
;jt1
J:'acility: Kimberly Clark
Stack ldc111ific.1tion: Baghouse # 1 ---""'----------------------
Date: 9/30/202.i ---------
Run:
Fill c r Number: 7829 A Sample Box:
--=----=----=--=--=--=-== Rinses Blanks &
Rinses
Filter
Front Half
Blanks
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/l00ml
Final 1: 0.6706 --------0 b
Final:: 0.6707 --------g
Final .. wG:
Filter Prewcight:
Net
Net
Final 1: 107.9687 g
Final2: 107.9688 g
Final,wG:
Initial 1: 107.9660 ________ g
lnitial2: 0 !07.9657 ________ b
lnitialAvG:
Gross:
0.6707 g
0.6705 g
0.0002 g
0.2 mo "'
!07.9688 g
107.9659 g
0.002 9 g
Beaker Number: Blank: 0.000 0 g
Net 0.002 9 g
Net 2.9 mg
RESULTS Front Half
Filter 0.2 mg -----Wash 2.9 mg
Acetone (CH3COCH3)
Date: 10/9/2024
Date: 10/9/2024
Proc\!ss I
Finall
Date: 10/9/202-l
Date: 10/9/2024
Date: 5/22/202-l
Date: 5/22/2024
ProL\!:SS
Final
lnilial
ml
Time: 8:00 ----Time: 14:00
CRITERI/\
Weight Tim~
Pass Pass
Time: 8:00
Time: 14:00
Time: 8:00
Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
Weight Time
Pass Pass
Pass Pass
Total 3.1 mg
==:=::==========--~-------------------l. Olllllllcll(S: r '11k-r1,, 1 J \Vc1ght=-i-ar~ l. 0.5 mg of ..:.ich olh..:r. or within I 0o of the net weight. 2) 1l1crc shall be at h!ast 6 hrs bct\\t.:c.n wc1ghing.s.
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara Date: I 0/3/24
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen Date: 10/9/24
Facility: Kimberly Clark
Stack ldcntific;ition: Baghouse # 1 --=---------------------
Date: L0/1/2024 ---------Run: 2 ----Fi It er Number: 7830 Sample Box: B
Blanks &
Rinses
Filter
Front Half
----
Blanks Rinses
Acetone (CH3 COCH
3
) 0.0000 g/l00ml Acetone (CH
3
COCH
3
)
:=_.:__ _________ -=======-----125 ml
Final 1: 0.6897 g --------Final~: 0.6898 g
Final,wc;: 0.6898 g
Filler l'rcwcight: 0.6899 g
Final 1: 107...1-396 g
Fina 12: 107.-l399 g
Initial 1: 107.4371 g
lniti.il2: 107.4373 g
N
N
el
et
Finalw 0:
lnitic1l,wa:
Gross:
-0.000 I g
-0.1 mg
107.4398 g
107.4372 g
0.0026 g
Date: I 0/9/24 Time: 8:00 ----Dale: 10/9/24 Time: 14:00 ----
CRITERIA
Process Weight Time
Finni Pass Pass
Date: 10/9/24 Time: 8:00
Date: 10/9/24 Time: 14:00
Date: 5/22/24 Time: 8:00
Date: 5/22/24 Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
Beaker Number: 48 Blank: 0.0000 g Proclo!ss Weight Time
Net 0.0026 g Final Pass Pass
Net 2.6 mg lniti:11 Pass Pass
RF:SULTS Front Half
Filter -0.1 mg
Wash 2.6 mg
Total 2.5 mg
Comments: ( ·nlcria 1) \Vc1g.hts are :i 0 . .5 mg or i:ach other. or within I ~o oftht.: net weight. 2) There shall he at h:a.-~t 6 hrs bctw..:cn weighings.
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara Date: 10/3/24
Lab Technician: Dean Ki1chen Date: 10/9/24
Facility: Kirnberly Clark Date: I 0/1/202-1----------Stack Identilication: Baghouse # I ---'='----------------------Run:
Fi II er Number: 783 l Sample Box:
Blanks & Blanks Rinses
Rinses
Filter
Front Half
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/IO0ml
Final1: 0.6735 g --------Final2: 0.6732 g --------
Final,wc: 0.6734 g
Filter Prnweig,ht: O 6740 g
Net -0.0006 g
Net -0.6 mg
Final,: 88.597 I g
Final2: 88.5973 g
Final,wc: 88.5972 0 b
Initial,: 88.5937 g
Initial2: 88.5933 ()
b
lnitial,wG: 88.5935 g
Gross: 0.0037 0 b
Acetone (CH3COCH3)
Date: l0/9/2024
Date: 10/9/2024
Process II
Fimi1II
Date: 10/9/2024
Date: 10/9/2024
Date: 5/22/2024
Date: 5/22/2024
Beaker Number: +9 Blank: 0.0000 g Process
Net 0.0037 g Final
Net 3.7 mg Initial
E£SlJLTS Front Half
Filter -0.6 mg
Wash 3.7 mg
Total 3.1 mg
Comments: C'rui.:n,1 1) \V...:ights arc 1:: 0.5 mg of e-nch other. or w1thm I% of the net weight. 2rincrc shall be at le.ast 6 hrs bctwci.:n weighing.-..
Lab Technician: Mike McNamarn
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen
125
Time:
Time:
CRITERIA
w~i)!ltt
Pass
Time:
Time:
Time:
Time:
CRITERIA
Weight
Pass
Pass
Date:
Date:
3
C
ml
8:00
14:00
Tune
Pass
8:00
14:00
8:00
14:00
Time
Pass
Pass
10/3/24
10/9/24
Baghouse #2
M ethod 5
Facility: ----,f-'-JG-'-LI d''--ij,,"-----'~~/_,_,0-;-f _....oc:V:'-</.<-=c:-.:.L-A~--Date:
Method: Stack IJc111 ilication: ' B ~-t¼, -z._,,,7
----""--'--'--=--=-------------------
IMPINGERS
Run: Sample 13ox: __ P\-__
Filter Number:
11331-
l·iltcr Description
Silica Gel
100
Im pinger Number
...L 3 I 4 I .,.5._ 6
Initial Volume ofliquid (11,0) in impingcrs. (ml)
100 ! ! SG !
Total (gl
=======
IM l!,IN,Jill.S
Run: Sample Box: __ B __
Filh:r Numhcr: lmpmgcr Number
..L 3 I 4 I 5
Initial Volume ofliquid (H,0) in impingcrs. (ml)
100 100 ! ! SG !
Total (g) l · ~ ========
Filt..:r D..:scription /Jt/ VI). ~
Silica Gel Ji J/ Ge r-------,,✓..__7.,"-/¥--'C......,c;...--'---
Run: ] Sample Box: _L __ _
Filler Numb.::r: lmpmgcr Number
...L 3 I 4 1 ..i.
Initial Volume of liquid (H,0) in imping~rs. (ml)
100 I 100 ! ! SG !
Total (g) =======
Filter Description f'? Cl V' (z /,#1
Silica Gd ¥ /flt ,f-
t,&JM
10 l z_/ 2..-<..f
Initials
lnifo1ls fr
jlJ.PN'
Facility: Kimberly Clark
Stack Identification: Baghouse # 2 --~--------------------Fill c r Number: 7832
Date: 10/1/202-l-
Run: 1
Blanks &
Rinses
---_-_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -------------------------------------======== Sample Box: A
Blanks Rinses
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/ 100ml Acetone (CH3COCH3) l05 ml
Filter Final1: 0.6695 g --------Date: I0/9/2024 Time: 8:00
Final:: 0.6693 g --------Date: I0/9/2024 Time: 14:00
Final,wc: 0.6694 g
Filter Prcwcigln: 0.6698 g
CRITERIA
Net -0.0004 g Process Weight I TUn.:
Net -0.4 mg final Pass I Pass
Front Half Final 1: 105.8799 g --------Date: 10/9/2024 Time: 8:00
Final:< l05.8800 g --------Date: 10/9/2024 Time: 14:00
Final,wc: I 05.8800 g
Initial 1: 105.8777 g --------Date: 5/22/2024 Time: 8:00
Initial:: 105.8774 g Date: 5/22/2024 Time: 14:00
Initial,wc: 105.8776 g
Gross: 0.0024 g CRITERIA
Beaker Number: 50 Blank: 0.0000 g Pro-:~ss Woighl Time
Net 0.0024 g Final Pass Pass
Net 2.4 mo b Jniti:11 Pass Pass
RESULTS From Half
Filler -0.4 mg
Wash 2.4 mg
Total 2.0 mg
Con1111c111s: I ~11h.:na I) \\\~1ghL) nrl.'. .1 t).5 mg of each other. or within I '10 of thr.: nel \\eight. 2) Then.: sh.:111 be at least 6 hrs bct\\'~(:n weighing.-..
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara Date: 10/3/24 -----
Lab Tcdmician: Dean l(jtehen Date: 10/9/24 -----
Facility: Kimberly Clark Da te: 10/2/2024 ---------Stack Identification: Baghouse # 2 ---"'---------------------Run: 2
Fi II er Number: 7833 Sample Box: B
Blanks & Blanks
--_-_-_-_-_ -_ -_ ---~:::::: ____________________________ _
Rinses
Rinses
Filter
Front Half
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/l00ml
Final 1: 0.6733 g --------Final:: 0.6733 g
Final,wG: 0.6733 g
Filter Preweight: 0 6716 g .
Net -0.0003 g
Net -0.3 mg
Final 1: 102.1060 g
Final:< !02.1062 g
Final,wG: 102.I061 g
Initial 1: l02.1049 g
Initial:: 102.1044 g
lnitial,wG: 102. !047 g
Gross: 0.0014 g
Beaker Number: 51 Blank: 0.0000 g
Net 0.0014 g
Net 1.4 m•• "'
RESULTS Front Half
Filter -0.3 mg
Wash 1.4 mg
Total 1.1 mg
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 95 ml
Dale: 10/9/24 Time: 8:00
Date: 10/9/24 Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
Proc~ss II Weil!)n I Ti.me
Finalll Pass T Pass
Date: 10/9/24 Time: 8:00
Date: 10/9/24 Time: 14:00
Date: 5/22/24 Time: 8:00
Date: 5/22/24 Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
Process Weight Time
Final Pass Pass
Initial Pass Pass
Co111111ents: I 'nt1;na 1) \.\'l..'ights m..: T tl.5 mg of l.!ach olh..:r. or within I ~I) of the net weight. 2) There shall be ,11 least 6 hrs between wcigl'-,i-'ng,;"-·. ________ _
Lab Tedmician: Mike McNamara
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen
Date: __ I0_/3_/_24_
Date: ----'I 0_/9-'-/_24_
Date: 10/2/2024 Facili1y: Kimberly Clark
Stack lde11tifica1ion: Baghouse # 2 --~--------------------Run: 3
Fi It er Number: 7834
Blanks & Blanks
Rinses
filter Final 1: 0.6705 g --------Final::: 0.6702 g
Final1wG: 0.6704 g
Filter Prcwcigh1: 0.6710 g
Net -0.0006 g
Net -0.6 mg
Front Half Final1: I00.88-l8 g
Final 2: 100.8852 0 b
Final,wG: 100.8850 g
Initial 1: 100.8835 g
Initial::: I 00.8835 g
lnitialAvG: I 00.8835 g
Gross: 0.0015 g
Beaker Number: 52 Blank: 0.0000 g
Net 0.0015 g
Net 1.5 mg
RESULTS Front Half
Filter -0.6 mg -----Wash 1.5 mg
Total 0.9 mg
Sample Box: C
Rinses
Acetone (CH3COCH3)
Dale: I 0/9/2024
Date: I 0/9/2024
Proc~ss I
Finalj
Date: 10/9/2024
Date: I0/9/2024
Date: 5/22/2024
Date: 5/22/2024
Proc.:ss
Final
Inilinl
100 ml
Time: 8:00 ----Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
Wcip.h1 Time-
Pass Pass
Time: 8:00
Time: 14:00
Time: 8:00
Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
Weight Time
Pass Pass
Pass Pass
Con11nc11Is: Cr111.:n.1 I) \Vi...·1ghts arc i 0.5 mg. of c,1ch other. or within J~1<, of1hc ncl \'.:c!ight. 2) There !>hall be al l~ast 6 l,_rs_· b_e1_w1,;_·•c.n_,_"·c~igh~i~ns,;~·· _______ _
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara Date: 10/3/24
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen Date: 10/9/24
Baghouse #3
Method 5
Facility: ---1-fi,_,_t..;c..ratia..,.,1,c__;fv-;..._'1'..,_)yl----'-"c-+t.J<C.ct~.A"'-',g __ _ I\ ~r d. °? Sta1:k ldcntilkation: ___,~""'-'~""--"R'-'---..;:,1.,,.-L-____________ _
Date: f,b_rz/,>-v
Method: ____ :, __ _
lMJ?I!\G ERS
Run: \.
Fi lt..:r Numbcr: Im pinger Number
Sample Box: -~,.c-A=-
Initials
2 3 I ...i. I 5 6
Initial Volume of liquid (H,O) in impingcrs. (ml)
I 00 ! I 00 ! ! SG !
)('/)
Total tg) 5. e>
=========
Filler Dcscription _C._(~'--=-V\.....,__ _____ _
Silic.i Ucl 1(J 5k,\-
ll\JPINCF:RS
Sample Box: __ f?~-
Filter Number:
Run: -~l=--_ ,
lmpmgcr Number
2 I .J.. I _:L I s 6
Initial Volume of liquid (H2O) in impingcrs. (ml)
100 100 ! ! SG ! &-½AA .....
Total (g)=====J~::!/===
I 'ilicr Description ___ C..---4/~el:.-)oec,,"'l!l'-----
Silica Gel ----'-,l,,-(J-1-✓~7-1--o.t=.,,....1~--
IMPINGERS
Run: __ ).L.-_
I iltcr Number:
2
lmpmgcr Number
Sample Box: ----C--
3 I .i.l s 6
Initial Volume of liquid (HiO) in impingcrs. (ml) ~
I 00 ! I 00 ! ! SG !
1-"ilto D..:s<.:ription ___ ..,,e,,.,::....L/..e:~_,:.--1::0:..!.... __ _
Silica Gt.:l __ ___;~...;,.?L........£1~/c.....::..fJ<ef:c.£... __
Facilit-v: Kimberly Clark
Stack Identification: Baghouse # 3 ---=---------------------
Date: 9/30/2024 ---------
Run:
Filter Number: 7826 Sample Box: A
Blanks &
Rinses
Hiter
Front Half
-=--=--=--=--=--=--=----_-_-_ -_ -_ ---------------------------=----_-_-_-_-_-_-
Blanks
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/lOOml
Final 1: 0.6843 " --------"' Fi nal 2: 0.68-U g --------
FinalAvG: 0.6843 g
Filter PrcwcigJ11: 0.6842 g
Net 0.0001 g
Net 0.1 mg
Final 1: 103.3857 (J e,
Final2: 103.3855 g
Final,wG: 103.3856 0 e,
Initial 1: 103.3830 0 e,
Initial:: 103.3826 g
Initial,wa: 103.3828 g
Gross: 0.0028 g
Rinses
Acetone (CH3COCH3)
Date: 10/9/2024
Date: 10/9/2024
Process II
l'inalll
Date: l0/9/2024
Date: 10/9/2024
Date: 5/22/2024
Date: 5/22/2024
JOO ml
Time: 8:00 -----
Time: 14:00 -----
CRITERIA
IV,ii,)H Tune
Pass Pass
Time: 8:00
Time: 14:00
Time: 8:00
Time: 14:00
CRITE!UA
Beaker Number: 53 Blank: 0.0000 g Proccs.s Weight Tm1e
Net 0.0028 g Final Pass Pass
Net 2.8 mg Initial Pass Pass
_RF:SU LTS Front Half
Filter 0.1 mg
Wash 2.8 mg
Total 2.9 mg
Comments: Cnkil.t 1) \\'c1ghL-. ,1r~ 1-iJ.5 mg of each other, or within 1% of the net wcigl,L 2)'I11crc shall Ix at kast 6 hrs bct\\\:t':n wcigh1~gs_·. _______ _
Lab Tcclrnician: Mike McNamara Date: 10/3/24 -----
Lab Teclrnician: Dean Kitchen Date: 10/9/24 -----
F:icility: Kimberly Clark Date: 9/30/202-l----------Stack ldentification: Baghouse # 3 Run: 2 --=---------------------------
Filler Number: 7827 Sample Box: B ----========-=======----------------_:__--======= Blanks &
Rinses
Filter
Front Ha lf
Blanks
Final 1: 0.67-1-8 g --------Final::: 0.6748 g --------
FinalAvG: 0.6748 g
Filter Prcwcight: 0 6757 g
Net -0.0009 g
Net -0.9 mg
Final 1: 104.2463 g
Final2 : 10-U465 g
Final,wc,: 104.2464 g
Initial 1: 10-1-.2-J.13 g
Initial~: 104.2415 0 0
lnitial,w0 : 104.2414 g
Gross: 0.0050 g
Rinses
Acetone (CH3COCI-13) 100 ml
Date: I 0/9/24 Time: 8:00 -----Date: 10/9/24 Time: 14:00 -----
CRITERIA
Process Wdgbt Time
final Pass Pass
Date: 10/9/24 Time: 8:00
Date: 10/9/24 Time: 14:00
Date: 5/22/24 Time: 8:00
Date: 5/22/24 Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
.. 54 Blank: 0.0000 g Proc~ss We1gh1 Tune Beaker Numbc1
Net 0.0050 g Final Pass Pass
Net 5.0 mer "' Initial Pass Pass
RESULTS Front Half
Filter -0.9 mg
Wash 5.0 mg
Total 4.1 mg
Comments: C'nti...·11.1 I ) \\\:1ghts arc l. 0 5 mgofcacho thl!r.or within lC?.oof 1hi.: net Wt!lght 2 ) T h ere s h all b r.: at lcrt'it 6 hrs bc tw..:cn w e1ghin¥5. _______ _
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara Date: 10/3/24
Lab Tcclmician: Dean Kitchen Date: I0/9/24
Facility: Kimberly Clark Dme: 9/30/2024
Stack ldcntificaiion: Baghouse # 3 ---'='----------------------Run:
Filler Number: 7828 ----=---=---=--=--=--=--=-=-=----BI an ks & Blanks
Rinses
Filter
Front Half
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/1001111
Final 1: 0.6769 g --------Final2: 0.6769 g
Final,w0 : 0.6769 g
Filter Prewe1gl1t: 0 6824 g
Net -0.0055 g
Net -5.5 mg
Final 1: 97.0680 g
Final:i: 97.0678 g
FinalAvG: 97.0679 (J e
Initial 1: 97.0613 g
Initial:: 97.0612 g
Jnitial,w0 : 97.0613 g
Gross: 0.0066 g
Beaker Number: 55 Blank: 0.0000 g
Net 0.0066 g
Net 6.6 mg
_BF.S ULT~ Front Half
Filter -5.5 mg
Wash 6.6 mg
Total I. I mg
Sample Box:
Rinses
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 110
Date: 10/9/2024 Time:
Date: 10/9/2024 Time:
CRITERIA
Process II Weighl
Fina1II Pass
Date: 10/9/2024 Time:
Date: 10/9/2024 Time:
Date: 5/22/2024 Time:
Date: 5/22/2024 Time:
CRJTERIA
Process Weight
Final Pass
Initial Pass
3
C
ml
8:00
14:00
Time
Pass
8:00
14:00
8:00
14:00
Time
Pass
Pass
Comments: ('r1l~n,1 I) \\r~1ght!) mc:r O 5 mgot·cach oth1.:r. orwi1hit1 113/oofthc n1,,;t weight 2) There shall be.at IC<L'it 6 hrs bl!twccn wci . .scgl.:....'"..s:lBS.:....· ________ _
Lab Tcclrnician: Mike McNamara Date: 10/3/24
Lab Tcclrnician: Dean Kitchen Date: 10/9/24
Baghouse #4
Method 5
Date: Facility:~~~--;f,,,_,,,.,~zrl'-'-~/2+-~ --b'-'-;-,----1 ,i-0~-k: __ _
Stack Identification: _ _ ,oJ "--,,,_,,., Method: 5 --_.._,,..;q-...,...'--"""'---f---------
IMPINGERS
Run: J Sample Box: p
I
Filter Number: Im pinger Number
+P;sz_ 2 I i. I 4 I -4-6
Initial Volume ofliquid (H2O) in impingers, (ml)
100 100 I J-SG I
Total (g) .)'--; C =========
Filter Description -----,,-v1_,_~_..e"--'v""'""'"'...,,___ ___ _
Silica Gel _~k--,r--;,-;1'7+L-i!>~_,/;,"-· _,,(: __ _
IMPINGERS 2. Run: ----Sample Box: --;:IE==--
Filter Number: lmpinger Number
...L 1 3 1 4 1 s ::/-Ji s:) Initial Volume of liquid (H2O) in impingers, (ml)
~ 1~0 I 1~0 I ~ I s? I
(,~~IIl~J t'.td ~~i~
.. ~.3 ,, ,u
Total (g) ~ -l =======
Filler Description _ ___,,,,..,...cd,~~_,,17""",.=-----
Silica Gel -----,f _ ___...1½/~: _..C..::.:-1L.·;&--A__::__ __
IMPINGERS
6
Run: ----Sample Box: j::.. ---,--
Filter Number: lmpinger Number
c-1= ...L 1 3 1 4 1 s
Initial Volume of liquid (I-!2O) in impingers, (ml)
100 100 I I SG I
Total (g) \., \
Filler Description c,,/t:qf]
Silica Gel Jy -0 #" /-
-------
Initials
XD
Facility Kimberly Clark
Stack I dent ifieation: Baghouse # 4
Filter Number: 7852
-----·----··-
Bllanks & Blanks
Rin1ses Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/lO0ml
FiUer Final 1: 0.6609 g
Final2: 0.6611 g
FinalAva: 0.6610 g
Filter Preweight: 0.6625 g
Net -0.0015 g
Net -1.5 mg
·-----------------·
Front Half Final 1: 122.4299 g
Final2: 122.4297 g
FinalAva: 122.4298 g
Initial1: 122.4253 g
Initial2: 122.4250 g
InitialAva: 122.4252 g
Gross: 0.0046 g
Beaker Number 56 Blank: 0.0000 g
Net 0.0046 g
Net 4.6 mg
RESULTS Front Half
Filter -1.5 mg -----Wash 4.6 mg
Total 3.1 mg
Date:· 9/30/2024
Run:
Sample Box:
Rinses
Acetone (CH3COCH3)
Date: 10/9/2024
Date: 10/9/2024
Process
Final
Date: 10/9/2024
Date: 10/9/2024
Date: 6/28/2024
Date: 7/1/2024
Process
Final
Initial
150
Time:
Time:
CRITERIA
Weight
Pass
Time:
Time:
Time:
Time:
CRITERIA
Weight
Pass
Pass
1
D
ml
8:00
14:00
Time
Pass
8:00
14:00
10:00
14:00
Time
Pass
Pass
Comments: Criteria:_ 1 )_ Weights arc cl 0.5 mg of each other, or within I% of the net weight. 2) There shall be at least 6 hrs between weighings.
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara Date: 10/3/24
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen Date: 10/9/24
Facility: Kimberly Clark Date: 9/30/2024 ----...:.-------------------St a ck Identification: Baghouse # 4 ---=---------------------Run: 2 -----Filter Number: 7853 Sample Box: E ----·········-·-··-------------------------------------~
Blanks &
Rinses
Blanks Rinses
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/lO0ml
!PiUer Final 1: 0.6705 g --------Fi 11 al 2: 0.6703 g
FinalAvG: 0.6704 g
Filter Preweight: 0.6719 g
Net -0.0015 g
Net -1.5 mg
Front Half Final 1: 124.7097 g
Final2: 124.7099 g
FinalAvG: 124.7098 g
[nitial1: 124.7068 g
Initial 2: 124.7071 g
InitialAvG: 124.7070 g
Gross: 0.0028 g
Date: 10/9/24
Date: 10/9/24
Process
Final
Date: 10/9/24
Date: 10/9/24
Date: 6/28/24
Date: 7/1/24
Beaker Number: 1 Blank: 0.0000 g Process
Net 0.0028 g Final
Net 2.8 mg Initial
RESULTS Front Half
Filter -1.5 mg ----Wash 2.8 mg
Total 1.3 mg
Comments: Cflt(,ri".:. I) Weights are± 0.5 mg of each other, or within I% of the net weight. 2) There shall be at least 6 hrs between weighings.
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen
ml
Time: 8:00 -----Time: 14:00 -----
CRITERIA
Weight Time
Pass Pass
Time: 8:00
Time: 14:00
Time: 10:00
Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
Weight Time
Pass Pass
Pass Pass
Date: 10/3/24
Date: 10/9/24
Facility: Kimberly Clark
Stack Identification: Baghouse # 4
Date: 9/30/2024
Run: 3 --~--------------------Filter Number: 7854 Sample Box: F --------
BI an ks & Blanks Rinses
Rinses Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/lO0ml Acetone (CH3COCH3) ···-------------------__:____::___ _ __:::__======-=-------:____::_-----=-:._-=======-----100 ml
Final 1: 0.6657 g Date: 10/9/2024 Time: 8:00 -------------Fi 11 a I 2: 0.6658 g Date: 10/9/2024 Time: 14:00
FinalAva: 0.6658 g
Filter Preweight: 0.6664 g
CRITERIA
Net -0.0006 g Process Weight Time
Net -0.6 mg Final Pass Pass
Frnnt Half Final 1: 128.5222 g Date: 10/9/2024 Time: 8:00
Final2: 128.5223 g Date: 10/9/2024 Time: 14:00
Final Ava: 128.5223 g
Initial 1: 128.5202 g Date: 6/28/2024 Time: 10:00
Initial 2: 128.5206 g Date: 7/1/2024 Time: 14:00
InitialAva: 128.5204 g
Gross: 0.0019 g CRITERIA
Beaker Numb er: 2 Blank: 0.0000 g Process Weight Time
Net 0.0019 g Final Pass Pass
Net 1.9 mg Initial Pass Pass
RESULTS Front Half
Filter -0.6 mg -----Wash 1.9 mg
Total 1.3 mg ---------·-----· -----------=::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::=--::___ _____________ _
Comments: Criteria: 1.) Weights are± 0.5 mg of each other, or within I% of the net weight. 2) There shall be at least 6 hrs between weighings.
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara Date: 10/3/24
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen Date: 10/9/24
Baghouse #5
Method 5
Facility: _,/ ........... f, '~ni'-'-J.,F-L~"<i'/~f..,,,i"--"""U;_,_./ c,"""~+-'---=c--------
Stack Identification: ----',;,B""-""'~-:rF-l, .... c ... v'-'-'-u--"'-_ _y_~11i'iff.1,f-· -'""'£ ______ _
Date: /t:,:,-/->--(
Method: 5
IMPINGERS
Run: -I Sample Box: !2
Filter Number: lmpmger Number
_J__ I 3 1 4 1
Initial Volume ofliquid (H2O) in impingers, (ml)
100 100 I I SG I
Total (gl =======
Filter Description __ __,.//c,_..· /2"-'~=v.=--:n'-'-----
Silica Gel Y:,1 ~., ·"" /----+'-... .___,,~,L-=,"~/'I"---<'----r 7
6
I
IMPINGERS
Run: 2. / ~
Sample Box: {. ----
Filter Number: lmpinger Number
2 I 3 1 4 I 5 6
. Initial Volume of liquid (H2O) in impingers, (ml)
100 1 100 I I . SG I
1 2 4
!:::;~ ~~;1131,s 1tw11£rt 1
Total (g) ~ )
Filter Description ___ ?/2=-<-<~=~=4,__ ___ _
Silica Gel ,t_ JL't'/: ,A --,--=7,,,,,.._....,.,,. ____ _
lMPINGERS
Run: () Sample Box: _ .... f __
Filter Number: Im pinger Number
i. I i I 4 1 s 6 = Initial Volume of liquid (H2O) in impingers, (ml)
100
Total (g) =======
Filter Description -----,-~---~"""=-'-'et:,""'------
Silica Gel _~f,p-,,,__,_1..,.Ls....· >:0""'1'.'-'-1 ____ _
Initials
Initials
Initials
Facility: Kimberly Clark Date: 10/1/2024 ---------Stack Identification: Baghouse # 5 Run: 1 --=---------------------Filter Number: 7855
Blanks Bhrnks &
Rinses Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/lO0ml
Sample Box:
Rinses
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 125
... ----· -··--------------------------------------
Final1: 0.6568 g Date: 10/9/2024 Time: --------Fin al 2: 0.6568 g Date: 10/9/2024 Time:
FinalAvG: 0.6568 g
Filter Preweight: 0.6572 g
CRITERIA
Net -0.0004 g Process Weight
Net -0.4 mg Final Pass
!Front Half Final 1: 118.6456 g Date: 10/9/2024 Time:
Final2: 118.6459 g Date: 10/9/2024 Time:
FinalAvG: 118.6458 g
Initial1: 118.6436 g Date: 6/28/2024 Time:
lnitial2: 118.6441 g Date: 7/1/2024 Time:
InitialAvG: 118.6439 g
Gross: 0.0019 g CRITERIA
Beaker Number: 3 Blank: Q.0000 g Process Weight
Net 0.0019 g Final Pass
Net 1.9 mg Initial Pass
RESULTS Front Half
Filter -0.4 mg
Wash 1.9 mg
Total 1.5 mg
Comments: Criteria: __ 1) Weights are± 0.5 mg ofeach other, or within 1 % of the net weight. 2) There shall be at least 6 hrs between weighings.
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara Date:
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen Date:
D
ml
8:00
14:00
Time
Pass
8:00
14:00
10:00
14:00
Time
Pass
Pass
10/3/24
10/9/24
Facility: Kimberly Clark Date: 10/1/2024
Stack Identification: Baghouse # 5 --=---------------------Run: 2
Filter Number: 7856 Sample Box: E
Blanks &
Rinses
Blanks Rinses
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/lO0ml
IFnUier Final1: 0.6629 g --------Fin a I 2: 0.6630 g
Fina!Avo: 0.6630 g
Filter Preweight: 0.6637 g
Net -0.0007 g
Net -0.7 mg
Front Half Final 1: 125.7182 g
Final2: 125.7183 g
FinalAvo: 125.7183 g
Initial l: 125.7142 g
Initial 2: 125.7144 g
InitialAvo: 125.7143 g
Gross: 0.0040 g
Acetone (CH3COCH3)
Date: 10/9/24
Date: 10/9/24
Process
Final
Date: 10/9/24
Date: 10/9/24
Date: 6/28/24
Date: 7/1/24
Beaker Number: 4 Blank: 0.0000 g Process
Net 0.0040 g Final
Net 4.0 mg Initial
-·--~----···--·-
RESULTS Front Half
Filter -0.7 mg
Wash 4,.0 mg
Total 3.3 mg
Comments: Criteria: l )_Weights are± 0.5 mg ofeach other, or within 1% of the net weight. 2) There shall be at least 6 hrs between weighings.
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen
100 ml
Time: 8:00
Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
Weight Time
Pass Pass
Time: 8:00 ----Time: 14:00
Time: 10:00 ----Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
Weight Time
Pass Pass
Pass Pass
Date: 10/3/24
Date: 10/9/24
Facility: Kimberly Clark Date: 10/1/2024
Stack Identification: Baghouse # 5 --=---------------------Run:
Fi lt c r Number: 7857 Sample Box:
Blanks &
Rinses
Blanks Rinses
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/lO0ml Acetone (CH3COCH3) 100
Final1: 0.6543 g Date: 10/9/2024 Time: --------Fi 11 al 2: 0.6543 g Date: 10/9/2024 Time:
FinalAvG: 0.6543 g
Filter Preweight: 0.6556 g
CRITERIA
Net -0.0013 g Process Weight
Net -1.3 mg Final Pass
Front Haff Final1: 124.9438 g Date: 10/9/2024 Time:
Final2: 124.9438 g Date: 10/9/2024 Time:
FinalAvG: 124.9438 g
Initial 1: 124.9413 g Date: 6/28/2024 Time:
Initial 2: 124.9416 g Date: 7/1/2024 Time:
Initial A vG: 124.9415 g
Gross: 0.0023 g CRITERIA
Beaker Number: 5 Blank: 0.0000 g Process Weight
Net 0.0023 g Final Pass
Net 2.3 mg Initial Pass
--·--.-~~---
RESULTS Front Half
Filter -1.3 mg
Wash 2.3 mg
Total 1.0 mg
Criteria: 1) Weights are± 0.5 mg of each other, or within 1 % of the net weight. 2) There shall be at least 6 hrs between weighings.
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara Date:
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen Date:
3
F
ml
8:00
14:00
Time
Pass
8:00
14:00
10:00
14:00
Time
Pass
Pass
10/3/24
10/9/24
Baghouse #6
Method 5
Date: / ,:::'/ ---)..-):y
Method: 5
Run: / --'---Sample Box: __ f,...·'7 __
lmpingcr Number Initials
7/3.Ff} 2 3 I 4 I s 6
100
Initial Volume of liquid (1-1,0) in imping.crs_ (ml)
100 ! ! SG !
Total (gl ====Lz=·=<'1===
Run: L --,=--Sam pie l3ox: ___,./; ___ _
2
lmpingcr Number
3 I 4 1 s
Initials
6
Initial Volume of liquid (H,O) in impingcrs, (ml)
100
Total (g) ),. 0 =========
Run: } -;,---Sarnplc Box:
2
lmpinger Number
I .,l..,, I 4 I .2.. 6
Initials
100
Initial Volume of liquid (I 1,0l in impingcrs, (ml)
100 ! ! SG !
,:::~:: ::: ~.~I~ WI ~~219;!/ I
Total (g) / /' h
, ii • ·1 ! >c·,,:ri1H i,,11 __ ,,_~_,,:/"----"-l(-'t}'---~~-'--/t,1_,_
~,i; :,.,,<id -~f--;,,,,,~6"//_,,,4 ,(1-'---7-___ _
Facilit~·: Kimberly Clark
Stack ldcn1ifica1ion: Baghouse # 6
Filter Number: 7858
Blanks & Blanks
Rinses Acetone (CH3COCHJ) 0.0000
Fillc1· Final 1: 0.6612 g
FinalJ: 0.6613 g
Final,wG:
Filter Prcwc,g1i1:
Net
Net
Front Half Final 1: 128.0989 0 b
Final~: 128.0989 g
Final,wG:
Initi al 1: 128.0958 0 b
Initial~: 128.0962 0 b
g/lO0ml
0.6613 0 I:>
0.6614 g
-0.000 I g
-0.1 mg
128.0989 g
Date: I 0/2/2024-
Run: I -----
Sample Bo:--: D
Rinses
Date: I 0/9/2024
Date: I 0/9/2024
-----
100 ml
Time: 8:00
Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
Process II
Fina1jj
Dale: I0/9/2024
Date: 10/9/2024
Date: 6/28/2024
Dale: 7/l/2024
Wc.!1gh1 Tulle
Pass Pass
Time: 8:00
Time: 14:00
Time: 10:00
Time: 14:00
lnitial,wG: 128.0960 g
Gross: 0.0029 g CRITERIA
Beaker Number: 6 Blank: 0.0000 g Proc~ss Wci.[!111 Time
Net 0.0029 g Final Pass Pass
Net 2.9 mg Initial Pass Pass
.RESULTS Front Half
Filter -0.1 mg
Wash 2.9 mg
Total 2.8 mg
c·o111men1s: < 'nktl,l I) \\1c1ght~ ,m.: .!. 0 . .5 mgof ~.'lch oLhcr. or \Vilhin l-0:o of the net \1,'c1ght. 2) 71,crc shall b~ at least 6 hrs b_cl_wc_'e_n ,_\'c...,,·igl:....>i...,,ngs:....·· _______ _
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara Date: 10/3/2.i
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen Date: 10/9/24
Facility: Kimberly Clark
Stack Identification: Baghouse # 6 --=---------------------Filler Number: 7859
Date: I 0/2/2024
Run: 2
Sample Box: E ===========::-_-::.. ____________________________ _
Blanks &
Rinses
Blanks Rinses
filter Final,: 0.6591 g --------Final2: 0.6593 g
FinalAvc: 0.6592 g
Filler Preweigh1: 0 6598 g
Net -0.0006 g
Net -0.6 mg
Front Half Fim11 1: 87.94 15 g --------Final:: 87.9420 g --------
Final1wG: 87.9418 g
lnitial1: 87.9390 g --------Initial:: 87.9392 g
lnitial,wc: _87.9191 g
Gross: 0.0027 g
Acetone (CH3COCH3)
Date: 10/9/24
Date: 10/9/24
Proc~ss
Final
Date: 10/9/24
Date: 10/9/24
Date: 6/28/24
Date: 7/1/24
Beaker Number: 7 -Blank: 0.0000 g Process -
Net 0.0027 = g Final
Net 2.7 mg Initial
RESULTS Front Half
Filter -0.6 mg
Wash 2.7 mg
Total 2.J mg
Comments: <"nh..-r1d l j \V1.!1ghts ari;o ± 0.5 mg of each oth.:r. or within I ~~o of the nd weight. 2) ~n,crc shall be at least 6 hrs between wcighin~.
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen
100 ml
Time: 8:00 ----Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
WciAhl Time
Pass Pass
Time: 8:00 ----Time: 14:00
Time: 10:00 ----
Time: 14:00 ----
CRITERIA
Weight Time
Pass Pass
Pass Pass
Date: 10/3/24
Date: 10/9/24
Faci lity: Kimberly Clark Date: 10/2/2024
Stack Identificat ion: Baghouse # 6 ---=---------------------Run:
Fi It c r Number: 7860 --------Sample Box:
Blanks & Blanks Rinses
Rinses
Filter
Front Half
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/l00ml
Final 1: 0.6663 g --------Final~: 0.6666 g --------
Final,wc: 0.6665 g
Filler Prcweight'. 0.6667 g
Net -0.0002 g
Net -0.2 mg
Fina!1: 102.4199 D 0
Final 2: 102.-.i202 g
Final,wc: 102.420 I g
lnitial 1: 102.4187 D 0
lnitial2: 102.4187 g
lnitialAvG: 102.41 87 g
Gross: 0.0014 g
Acetone (CH3COCH3)
Date: 10/9/2024
Date: 10/9/2024
Procl)SS
Final
Date: J0/9/2024
Date: 10/9/2024
Date: 6/28/2024
Date: 7/1/2024
Beaker Number: 8 Blank: 0.0000 g Process
Net 0.0014 g Final
Net 1.4 mg Initial
RESULTS Front Half
Filter -0.2 mg
Wash 1.4 mg
Total 1.2 mg
Comments: < ·rncn., I J Weights arc -:-0 5 mg_~-each other. ur within I% of the net weight. 2) There shall be at lea.st 6 hrs between wcighongs.
Lab Tcdmician: Mike McNamara
Lab Teclu1ician: Dean Kitchen
110
Time:
Time:
CRITERIA
Wcigho
Pass
Time:
Time:
Time:
Time:
CRITERIA
Weight
Pass
Pass
Date:
Date:
3
F
ml
8:00
14:00
Time
Pass
8:00
14:00
10:00
14:00
Time
Pass
Pass
10/3/24
10/9/24
Baghouse #8 .
Method 5
hicility:_,,__/(_1---:::-'h~ J0_,,~lf,_~U +--"fq,;-<....C1/lfc....:....1 __ _ Dale:
Method: '-.:;,c,;•: i•.:i.:nliiic:.llinn: ___ ,_.J:J,"--1'~'-'--/-~__,,/'-------------------
Run: ----l Sample 13ox: __ A __ _
2
Im pinger Number
3 I -4--I 5
Initial Voll1mc of liquid (H,O) in impingers. (ml)
100 SG
Total (gl • 3
Run: ----L Sample 13ox: _...:;,O=----
='= 2
lmpmger r:lumber
1 3 1 4 1 s 6
Initial Volume orli,1uid (1·1,0) in impingcrs. (ml)
100 100 I SG
Final <gl -,------'f-.!--=-'--.,,:....f--'--'-'-"c.;._:,""-+--'=-=-'...e0:::...,,..+----1-----
l ni I iul (!,!l..l.L7.f~-i~+c=-'-Y--"",.<~'-7-+..c...:::'-"~:..L..,;'rb-+----+---
N-:t (:;I l . L =====:::!============================
Total (g) '-l -~
, 1: •• 1 1 ,, __ ,,.-rip, inn -----'e,--'-/-'~"--'v.'-'e,"'---'-__ _
Siiirn (,<.:1 ___ 1...,r=-=~?-r-7'-,,,/ ........ 1"'.:.,..'d~_/---
7 fYJ 7
Run: 3 Sample Box:---"£..,_ __
2
Imprngcr Number
I 3 1 4 1 s 6
Initial Volume ofl,quid (I J,OJ in impingcrs. {ml)
100
f-i nal tgl --=---'-~:--l--'--=--+-'::-~---''---+~...>..:<-H------+----
l nit i,tl t:;I
Nd (gl -.;::,"{;;~[j4~'::j:;::-t1:i:~.+~~.,::j;:~t ----'~"=:t::t---,---
Total (g) 5 • 4.
======='===
Initials
Initials
Initials
F:1cilit~·: Kimberly Clark
Stack Identification: Baghouse #8 ---""'----------------------
Dntc: 10/2/2024 ---------
Run: l ----
F ii t c r Number: 7835 Sample Box: A
Blanks &
Rinses
Filler
Front Half
----
Blanks Rinses
JOO ml Acetone (CH3 COCJ-13 ) 0.0000 g/J00ml Acetone (CH3 COCH3 )
-=======--=-----__:____::____::_.:..-========----
Final 1: 0.665 1 g --------Final:: 0.6652 g
Final,wc;: 0.6652 g
Filter P,cwc,gJn:. 0.6656 g
Final 1:
Final~:
Initial 1:
Initial~:
100.3066
100.3068
________ g
________ g
100.3058
100.3060
________ g
________ g
Net -0.0004 g .
Net -0.4 mg
Final1wc: 100.3067 g
l nitial1wG: 100.3059 g
Gross: 0.0008 g
D at c: 10/9/2024 Time: 8:00 ----Date: 10/9/2024 Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
Proc~ss Wc1~ht Time
Final Pass Pass
Date: l0/9/2024 Time: 8:00
Date: 10/9/2024 Time: 14:00
Date: 6/28/2024 Time: 10:00
Date: 7/1/2024 Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
Beaker Number: 9 Blank: 0.0000 g Proc~ss \Vi.:i~ll Timi.:
Net 0.0008 0 0 Final Pass Pass
Net 0.8 mg Initial Pass Pass
RESU LTS Front Half
Filler -0.4 mg
Wash 0.8 mg
Total 0.4 m <> .,,
Comments: l 'rn1..·na 1) \Vc1ght:i. arc L U.5 mg ot' each othl!r. or w1thm l~o of the nd m.:ight 2) ·rhcrc sh;:ill be ::tt least 6 hrs b~tw1!~n \\1~1gl_1i~ngs~·--
Lab Tcdmician: Mike McNamara Date: I 0/3/24
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen Date: I0/9/24
F:icility: Kimberly Clark Date: 10/2/2024
S1:1ck Identification: Baghouse #8 Run: 2 -----Filler Number: 7836 Sample Box: D
Blanks & Blanks Rinses
Rinses Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/l00ml 100 ml
---
Filter final1: 0.68-Hl g Date: 10/9/24 Time: 8:00 -----Final:: 0.6839 0 b Date: 10/9/24 Time: 14:00 -----Final,w0 : 0.6840 g
filter l'r~wdght: 0.684 l g
CRITERIA
Net -0.000 I 0 b Process Weight Time
Net -0.1 m g Final Pass Pass
Front Half Final 1: LO 1.5390 g Date: 10/9/24 Time: 8:00
Final 2: lO l.5392 g Date: 10/9/24 Time: 14:00
Final,w0 : 101.539 I 0 b
I nit i,!I 1: lO l.5382 0 b Date: 6/28/24 Time: 10:00
Initial:: 101.5384 g Date: 7/1/2-t Time: 14:00
Tnitial!'lvG: 101.5383 g
Gross: 0.0008 g CRITERIA
Beaker Number: 10 Blank: 0.0000 g Process W.;i~lll Time
Net 0.0008 g Final Pass Pass
Net 0.8 mg lni1ial Pass Pass
Front Half
Filter -0.1 mg
Wash 0.8 mg
Total 0.7 mg
Comments: CrHl'ft,1 1) \\'eight!> arc ± 0.5 mg ot' ca.ch other, or within 1% ofth~ ncl wdght 2) There shall bl! at lcast_6_hr_s· b_e_1\\_'c1,;_•n_w....:cigh"--' _ing.,c...' • _________ _
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara Date: 10/3/24
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen Date: 10/9/24
Facility: Kimberly Clark Dale: 10/3/2024 ---------Stack Identification: Baghouse #8 ---"'---------------------Run: 3
Fi It c r Number: 7837 Sample Box: E
Blanks & Blanks Rinses
Rinses
Filter
Acetone (CH3 COCH3 ) 0.0000 g/l00ml
Final,wG: 0.6854 g
Filter Preweight: 0.6855 g
Net -0.000 I g
Net -0.1 mg
Front Half Final1: 116.7200 g
Final~: 116.7202 g
FinalAvG: 116.7201 g
Initial 1: 116.7185 g
Initial:< 116.7189 g
lnitial,wG: 116.7187 g
Gross: 0.0014 g
Beaker Number: 11 Blank: 0.0000 g
Net 0.0014 g
Net 1.-t m•• b
ll_F.S lJ LTS Front Half
Filter -0.1 mg
Wash 1.4 mg
Total 1.3 mg
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 105 ml
Date: 10/9/2024 Time: 8:00
Date: 10/9/2024 Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
PrOCt!S.'-Wd~lu Time
Final Pass Pass
Date: 10/9/2024 Time: 8:00
Date: I 0/9/2024 Time: 14:00
Date: 6/28/2024 Time: 10:00
Date: 7/1/2024 Time: 14:00
CRITERIA
Process Weight Time!
Fin.ti Pass Pass
Initial Pass Pass
-
Con1111c111s: < 'rikn,1 l) \\1~1gh1s arc ~ 0.5 m g of each o lh~r. or within 1 °/o o f the net weight. 2) The.re shall he a t least 6 hrs bcl\vcen wcic,e;sf.:.c1in:c:e:g,,-'-'··. _______ _
Lab Technician: Mike McNamara Date: 10/3/24 -----
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen Date: _ ___;_;I 0;.:.../<;..:.~/_24_
Chain of Custody
TETCO Stack Emission Analnis +
.Accurate • Reliable e Qualified --.1.-'
Chain of Custody
391 L 620 S. \rncric,111 I url-.. l_ I 8-H>O ~
801--192-9106 • 801--192-9 107
-------:---:-:---:----7-~ .~ " ~ .r/1..
c2 oc ~ C: .. 1,,-~ ~ :no0 c,2c,2 Facility (& Source), A<4Lfut. -Ct,,_,/c_ _ :ij ii2 ~ {j 1e <Ii
--:y -;;:;3= ~u~cc..c:
,f,.,__.c_,, ~?..) 'tv;G~ _ ~ ': ~ "!! ci .i gal cJ "~ l _________ .:_ fT-~====='~t~~;;;; «: § u... (l) =-= ,ii a, ~ u ...,. § ::: t
cc: -od ., ..c: .s:!
~::::::::::::_ __ T_~_1M~~~:1"' " " ~ "-u a e ., o ,, '-a Notes f -r, ~ ,, ~ 0 u Cl. q, ~ u CU ;;. ' Method(s) 0 § ~ 5 ~ a.. r l u ;=;; :r: u <l'. ..L -• • ·-u Cl. u ..L < Analysis u... u... Date X Sample ID ./, _r,_.. ,_,~ IX ,
f}f--I,e: A/-,.,.,'; fol I I -
t.r D, 1-J?l-:: I l
n. .) .:z. ..r> I I N. .J ,, 1 ~ 1 -, o /d1 ~ B/-r J ~, .l I I I
,.,,_ /.011 ft>tu,~ I -I, --J
-.fl. ? _, J?.~..., / / .&..r. I, I~.\,,. ., • .J ~, _..,.J>l~ -, I A 1 / 1
,. • fl _l ..2..o , -:::r I I
• jl 1 _"] b ) r, / / µ"r
Ii 19: ~ J [' -F.) 2 ~'" > -. I 1:1,~ ., ' r •
• I':>,, 2 .... r 1 I J ' ,, -
n l L,:\~ .,
Sampled By: V /'-.~ Date: /
Recovered By: LllktJWf'-.--Date: Y-,
Analyzed By: Date: '--'7
Relinquished By: _ Received B~: Date:
Relinquished By: !Received By: IDate:
All samples remained in the custody of TETCO unless otherwise indicated.
Comments:
Facility (& Source):
TETCO
ki.irtJ ~-Ut:u1:_
114.:r~L ~~ 1.,) 'f ,-r-~
• #
Stack Emission A nalysis +
Accurate • Reliable • Qual1l1cd -..1.-
Chain of Custody
<.> '-' er. V, C:
c2 Q Q
c2 ~ V;
~ (l) c:3
C: if, "' VJ c::: 0::: C LJ ..c <Cl ~
~ 3 er:: ii: <.> "'O <:id X ;;; C:
3 <:id <.> v cc
~
C:
~
..... ..c -8 -e ..c ~ ~ <.) cs; C: ,_ -8 <Si u 3 0 u... 8 iii ,_ cs; <U u u... 0. u... (l) u g 0 M ethod(s) of -V' c:: 0 ~ 0. 6' g (l) rn 0 Q) (/) C C 0.... "' (.) 0 ,.., "'O
~ 0 ~ <.) Sample 10 Date A nalysis ,_
[.:.. u... u ~
0.... u I < Vl I u <
bJ-1 r-" I
'-.-,,. /, I> t. f-t tt-X' x -7 . n" "'7 ... -r ,
,_ I) "I 1.or-7 I I
It! r r-Pr :z... ~ 1 .... l> I. _ If.A.-
--., -< .... -~ --1 ,. ~1 ~-~ I I
,,-.,. Dl '"7 •Lt \ l I
~LJ t> ~, ~, ,_ 1'71~1,t. f-1 F
r, /.) ) .., ... ~" fl I
,. " l
-~ -.l-,..lL rnl!> I, t. J
l I
Sampled By :
Recovered By:
Analyzed By: /iJP..v--
Relinquished By: Received By:
Relinquished By: Received By:
All samples remained in the custody ofT ETCO unless otherwise indicated.
[Comments:
"' (l)
~ <I) X rn <.) 3
391 E 620 ~-\mcrican Fork. L I 8-1003
801--192-9 I 06 • 801-492-9107
z/L-
Notes
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Sr
I Ly

D
APPENDIX D

Figure 1. Facility Schematic Representation Baghouse #1- #4 & #6 Figure 2. Facility Schematic Representation Baghouse #5 & #8

Production Data (Retained by Kimberly-Clark)
h 1cil11~ J(i1nberly-Clark
'>wck ld,111ilica11n11. Fonning Baghouses # 1-#4 and #6
l+---0 -1
a
24"
j,
y I I I I I
13
I
<X: Dis1ancc upstream from ne.xt diswrbancc. inches 18"
~: Distance downstream from las1 disturhancc. in. 62"
y: Distance of Sample Len:1 to ground. lect IO'
Straightening
Vanes
0: Stack Inside Diameter. inches 36"
Estimated Moist11rc. pcrccm
Estimated Tcmpcraturc. 0[' I 05-115
Estimated Velocity. 1pm 2,200-3,300
Conlrol llnit
Type;
Baghouse
Number of Ports 2
Process
Type;
Diaper Manufacture
Figure I Facilit, Schcnmtic Rcprc,cntation
'"'"'' Kimberly-Clark
t
a
!
y
Stack Identification: Co llector Ba_ghouse #5 and #8
1~ 0 ~ I
13
a : Distance upstream from next disturbance, inches 30" ----------
f3: Distance downstream from last disturbance, in. 48"
y: Distance of Sample Level to roof, feet ---------12'
0 : Stack Inside Diameter, inches ---------24"
Estimated Moisture, percent
Estimated Temperature, °F 107 ---------
Estimated Velocity, t))ln 1,500
Contrnl Unit
Type:
Bagho use
Number of Ports 2
Figure 2. Facil ity Schematic Representation
Process
Type:
Diaper Manufacture

E
APPENDIX E

Calibration of the console dry gas meter(s), pitot tubes, nozzles diameters, and temperature sensors were carried out in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance
Handbook. The appropriate calibration data are presented in the following pages. The nozzle
calibrations are recorded on the first page of the field data sheets.

Figure 3. Schematic of Method 5 Sampling Train
Meter Box Calibration Data and Calculations Forms
Post-test Dry Gas Meter Calibration Data Forms Type-S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration
Filter Balance Calibration
Ternoe:ature
Sens':)r t Rob
::=cu~ ·+ I
"l}?OS
Pt;:t Ti.to Temperature Std< ~ ~-~
/
Tws S AtotTube
S•r ·~~~
~
Schematic of Method 5 Sampling Train
Temoer2:ure
Sensor
GassFlter ~
!-ea1edHea
Temperature
Sensor
,------.-:--;;:-----
I lrrp11_ge.
-, IC8 "I
1lil ~r p11 .. I l il Bath-11 tl I'd
!~ • ,~,1 1~1_ j
M:io:xn,ter
Qif,co
~ t
Terq:,erall.re
Sensors.
DyGas
M,ter
Figure 3
0 )) Nr-Tr;hl Purrp
Vacw.rn
Lm
/
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
I ) Select three cnt,cat orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter I-mich bracket the expected operating range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
~,•-.-. -•!!
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information In the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.
TECHNICIAN: I Jos~ph Wells
DATE:l 12I19I2022
METER PART#: I Console 4
K' TESTED
METER SERIAL#: 27863
CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL#: 1453S
FACTOR I VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3)
ORIFICE#
G
G
G
RUN # (AVG) (In Hg)
0.8137 11
0.8137 11
0,8137 11
0.5317 13
0.5317 13
0.5317 13
0.3307 13
o.3307 13
0,3307 13
INITIAL I FINAL I NET (V,,,)
832.125 842.747
842.747 853.441
853.441 864.062
806.381 813.332
813.332 820.303
820.303 827.282
892.625 897.750
897.750 903.142
903.142 908.557
10.622
10.694
10.621
6.951
6.971
6.979
5.125
5.392
5.415
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
INITIAL
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE In H ): 25.35
EauIPMENT 1D n, Console #4
TEMPERATURES •F
AMBIENT I DGM INLET I DGM OUTLET DGM
AVG
71
71
71
71
71
71
68
68
68
INITIAl. t="INAt. j l~ITIAI.. FINAL
72 88 69 71
84 85 71 74
84 82 74 74
78 77 71 72
17 78 71 71
75 78 71 72
73 72 70 70
72 72 70 70
72 73 70 70
75.0
78.5
78.5
74.5
74.3
74.0
71.3
71.0
71.3
2024 Pre-Calibration
FINAL AVG (P0y) ~ 25.35 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,
ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
ELAPSED l
TIME(MIN) (1) (2) (3) y
0 Vm(STD) V,, (STD) y VARIATION('/,)
10.00 3.20 8.9659 8.9541 0.999
10.00 3.20 ~ ~ 0.998
10.00 3,20 8.9067 8.9541 1.005
AVG• .tfilll !ill.
10.00 1.20 6.8390 5.8509 1.002
10.00 1.20 5.8585 5.8509 0.999
10.00 1.20 5,8680 ~ 0.997
AVG• ~ l!..1§.
11.76 0.45 4.3221 4.2917 0.993
12.38 0.45 4,6494 4.6180 0.993
12.43 0.45 4.5666 4.5362 0.993
AVG• 0.993 -0.46
The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, V m (std), and the critical orif~e.
Va (std). and !he DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automaically calculated in the spreadsheet above. AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = [ 0.998
(1)
(2)
(3)
Jlm ,,,J) ~ ;..· i • Vm • Phar ~ (1\J-1 / 13.(,)
Tm
= Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM. corrected to standard conditions
K, = 17,&.: "R/in. Hg (English). 0.3858 "Kimm Hg (Metric)
I ·er, .• , . = K ·• Pb~-• C:) r-;·-·~~-,·Ta111h
Tm • Absolute DGM avg. temperature ("R -English. "K -Metric)
= Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions
T _, = Absolute ambient temperature (R • Enghsh. "K • Metric)
K' = Average K' factor from Critical Onfice Cal1brat1on
1·c,\,1,,,
r :.: l'111v.'1..'I
= DGM calibration factor
AVERAGEt,H@•t 1.716
.IH@ =
(
0.75 0 )2 t,H (Vm(sld))
Va(std) Vm
TEMPERATURE SENSORS 'F
REFERENCE IN OUT
32 33 32
72 73 73
203 203 202
~
1.883
1.883
1.656
1.657
1.658
1.603
1.604
1.603
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.
TECHNICIAN:INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)
DATE:1/3/2024 METER SERIAL #:28152 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg):29.96 29.96 29.96 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,
METER PART #:Console 9 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #:1453S EQUIPMENT ID #:ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
K'TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED
FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3)AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN)DGM DH (1)(2)(3)Y
ORIFICE #RUN #(AVG)(in Hg)INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG q (in H2O)Vm (STD)Vcr (STD)Y VARIATION (%)DH@
1 0.8137 12 891.715 896.715 5.000 71 71 72 70 70 70.8 4.80 2.90 5.0171 5.0796 1.012 1.462
2 0.8137 12 896.715 901.750 5.035 73 71 71 71 71 71.0 4.80 2.90 5.0499 5.0700 1.004 1.466
3 0.8137 12 901.750 906.750 5.000 73 71 71 71 71 71.0 4.78 2.90 5.0148 5.0489 1.007 1.466
AVG = 1.008 -1.95
1 0.5317 10 818.428 823.611 5.183 71 78 78 77 77 77.5 7.72 1.10 5.1129 5.3383 1.044 1.277
2 0.5317 10 823.611 828.710 5.099 71 77 78 77 76 77.0 7.60 1.10 5.0347 5.2553 1.044 1.278
3 0.5317 10 828.710 833.800 5.090 71 77 77 76 76 76.5 7.52 1.10 5.0305 5.2000 1.034 1.279
AVG = 1.041 1.24
1 0.3307 12 840.227 845.500 5.273 73 77 78 76 75 76.5 12.53 0.45 5.2031 5.3789 1.034 1.355
2 0.3307 12 845.500 850.615 5.115 74 78 78 76 76 77.0 12.12 0.45 5.0425 5.1980 1.031 1.357
3 0.3307 12 850.615 855.800 5.185 74 78 76 76 75 76.3 12.42 0.45 5.1186 5.3266 1.041 1.359
AVG = 1.035 0.71
AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = 1.028
AVERAGE DH@ = 1.366
(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions
K1 =17.64 oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 oK/mm Hg (Metric)
Tm =Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric) DH@ = 0.75 q DH Vm(std)
Vcr(std) Vm
(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions
Tamb =Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric)
K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration REFERENCE IN OUT
(3)=DGM calibration factor 32 33 32
72 73 73
203 203 202
12
TEMPERATURE SENSORS oF
2024 Pre-Calibration
Joseph D. Wells
Console #9
30
19
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical orifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.
()2 ()
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
1) Select three cnt,cal onflces to calibrate the dry gas meter which brac~et the expected operating range
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report). for a penod of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated
Mike McNamara TECHNICtAN: I .................... . INITIAL
DATE: 10/412024 METER SERIAL #: 27863
METER PART#: Console 4 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL#: 14535
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 25.50
Eau1PMENT 1D #: Console #4
,-----.---,
K' I TESTED
FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT'_l
ORIFICE# RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINAL
G : 0.6808 12
0.6808 12
0.6808 12
81.050 86.847
86.847 91.985
91.985 97.135
G
□:rn~
0.8137 13
0.8137 13
0.8137 13
98.706 103.810
103.810 108.901
108.901 113.998
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
NET (Vm)
5.797
5.138
5.150
5.104
5.091
5.097
TEMPERATURES •F
AMBIENT I DGM INLET I DGM OUTLET
INITIAL FINAL INITlAL FINAL
75 73 73 76 82
74 73 75 82 86
75 75 76 86 92
75 77 78 91 96
75 78 79 96 93
75 79 80 93 90
I I I I I I
DGM
AVG
76.0
79.0
82.3
85.5
86.5
85.5
ua~ I :.
FINAL
25.50
ELAPSED
TIME (MIN)
0
6.50
5.75
5.75
4.75
4.75
4.7S
§
f.~
• (!ut11/I)•. Suv/ef • N~liu/JiliJ)' ,:_-~0 #,1~':'
~.;1•-
AVG (P.,,)
25.50
DGM ,\H
(in H,O)
1.95
1.95
1.95
2.80
2.80
2.80
§
(1)
Vm(STD)
4.8951
4.3145
4.2986
4.2452
4.2266
4.2393
Post Calibration
Kimberly Clark
IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,
ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
(2)
V"(STD)
4.8800
4.3210
4.3169
AVG=
4.2623
4.2623
4.2623
AVG=
AVG=
(3)
y
0.997
1.002
1.004
1.001
1.004
1.008
1.005
1.006
1
y
VARIATION(%)
-0.25
0.25
1.643
1.631
1.624
1.627
1.624
1.627
The follo1ing equations are used to calculate the s1andard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical orifice,
V0 (std), and the OGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automalicallycalculated in the spreadsheet abo,e. AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = [ 1.003
(1)
(2)
(3)
Vi11<,·r., ~ J.:, • v,11 • P/Jm· + (N-1 .' 13.6)
T,u
= Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions
K, = 17.6'; 'Rlin. Hg (Enghsh), 0.3858 'Kimm Hg (Metrtc)
Tm= Absolute DGM avg. temperature ("R -English, 'K • Metric)
Vcr.,M = J.:'~ Pbar • 0
J Ta111b
= Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions
T .1:rti = Absorute ambient temperature (9R -English, °K -Metric}
,·.,c,w) Y ~· --
l'm c.rJ,
K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Cal1bra1ion
= DGM calibration factor
AVERAGE dH19 =I 1.629
tiH,.,=
(
0.76 8 )
2
L\H (Vm(std))
Vc,(Std) V,.
TEMPERATURE SENSORS 'F
REFERENCE IN OUT
...
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES ~"}--
1) Select lhree critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket lhe expected operating range.
unlit)•, Stn·ia -R~liubilitf , -~ ,..,_ ,c;;;;s
2) Record barometric pressure before and after cal1braIion procedure
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Caltbralion Report). for a penod of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.
TECHNICIAN: Mike McNamara
DATE: 10141202< METER SERIAL#: 28152
INITIAL
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE in H : 25.50
METER PART#: Console 9 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL#: 1453S EQUIPMENT 10 #: Console #9
K' TESTED
FACTOR I VACUUM I' OGM READINGS i_FT'J
ORIFICE # I RUN# (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL I FINAL I NET (Vm)
G: 0.6808 10
0.6808 10
0.6808 10
99.150 104.731
104.731 111.608
111.608 116.749
0:
□:§§ 0.8137 10
0.8137 10
0.8137 10
118.100 128.378
128.378 134.216
134.216 140.542
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
5.581
6.877
5.141
10.278
5.838
6,326
TEMPERATURES °F
AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM
INITl.-,L FINAL ltllTIAL FINAL AVG
72 71 72 70 71 71.0
72 72 76 71 71 72.5
73 76 78 71 72 74.3
73 76 81 72 74 75,8
73 81 84 74 74 78.3
73 84 85 74 75 79,5
I I I I I I
I 'I
FINAL AVG (P .. ,J
I 25.50 I 25.50
ELAPSED ,
TIME~MIN)I (1)
Vm (STD)
6.50 1.95 4.7571
8.00 1.95 5.8453
6.00 1.95 4.3554
9.75 2.90 8.7067
5.50 2.90 4.9225
5.99 2.90 5.3216
§ §
Post Calibration
Kimberly Clark
IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,
ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
l
y (2)
V.,(STD)
(3)
y VARIATION (%) I t.H@
4.8938 1.029 .1M!
6.0231 1.030 1.645
4.5131 1.036 1.641
AVG= 1.032 ill
8.7654 1.007 1.710
4.9446 1.004 1.701
5.3851 1.012 1.693
AVG= 1.008 -1.18
AVG=
The follov.rrg equations are used lo calculale the stand?rd vol•Jmes of air passed through the DGM, Vn (std), and the critical orilice, V0
(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. Tr.ese equations are auIomalieally calculated in the spreadsheet above. AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = [ 1.020
(1)
(2)
(3)
f"i11<,··'! = K., .,. ,-111 • Pbar +(::,H I D.6)
Tm
Pbor • 0 • -"''•-=== 1 ,.,.'"" • •• .JTnmb
= Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions
K, = 17 64 'R/,n, Hg (English), 0 3858 °K/mm Hg (Melric)
Tm= Absolute DGM avg lemperature (0R • English, °K • Melnc)
= Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard e-0nditions
T,m:, = Absolule ambient temperalure (0R • English, °K • Metric)
K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration
/"c,'"" r ---= DGM calibration factor
-V111,:id1
AVERAGE 6H@ =I 1.674
t.H,.=
( 0.75 0 )
2
t.H (V ro(std))
Vc,(std) Vm
TEMPERATURE SENSORS °F
REFERENCE IN OUT
Type S l'itot Tube lnspcclion Data
U,11c ___ l_'J_12_1_)2_-I __ Pilot Tube Identification: ------------27 G
Technician: X. Oang ----------~-------
_D~•-____ 0_.3_7_5 __ in. Is r .. = PA •1 ____ Y_c_s ___ _
Is 1.05 • D, ,; I'" & P11 ,; 1.50 • D, ., ____ Y_c_s ___ _
_ l..::'"c..= ____ 0._-1_42 ___ in.
l'A = 0.442 Ill.
a 1 < 10" a, = ___ 2 ___ 0
(l.z.< 10° Ct2= ___ 2 ___ 0
Z ~ 0.125 in. Z = __ 0"-.""0-'15 __ m.
V,.I ~0.03125 in. W = 0.015 in. ------
w > 3 inches W = __ .c.6 . .c.8_7,;...-__ in.
I.> 314 inch Z = ___ 0._8_7,_-__ in.
-----' 0
.-_Y ~Ji11d1cs Y = 3 3/4 Ill . ------
I he puo1 1ul>c meet, the ;pccifications for a cnlibra1io11 factor of0.84? Yes
Temperature Sensor Calibration
Rclcrcncc· Omega Cl 3512/\
Continuity Check Yes l'rohe
I lcat Check 248 Yes
I cm pcraturc , cmpcrmurc I cmpcrature
Source 1<e1crencc Sensor Difference
(Medium) ("F) ("F) (°f')
l'rohc AIR 71 71 0
J\IR 70 70 0
Stack ICE WATER 33 33 0
BOIL WATER 203 203 0
SII.ICOKEOIL
Type S Pi tot Tube I nsp~ction Data
1);1tc: ___ l--'/J_/2_(_)~_--1 __ Pi101 Tube Identification: _____ 2_7_G_-2 ____ _
o,
I
~'-----· "/
Tcchnician: ________ X_._D_a_n~g ______ _
D,= 0.375 111. Is I\= PR ? ____ Y_c_s ___ _
Is 1.05 • D, S I'" & Pn S 1.50 • D, '1 ____ Y_c_s ___ _
PA = 0.455 in.
Pu = 0.455 in.
a,< 10° a 1 = 0
a 2 < I 0° a2 = 0
Z s; 0. 125 in. Z = 0.016 in. ------
'C
W $ 0.03 I 25 in. W = 0.016 in. ------
W > 3 inches W = 6.875 in. ------
Z > 3/4 inch Z = 0.875 in. ------
0
--_ Y :'.'. 3 inches Y = ---'3--'--'3'-/_4 __ in.
I he p1tnl 1uhc meets the spccilications for a calibration ractor of 0.84? Yes
Tc111pcra1urc Sensor Calibration
~ .. -Rcforcncc· Ome0a CL 151? A
Probe Continuity Check Yes
Heat Check 248 Yes
, cmpcraturc 1 cmocraturc ·1 cmpcra1urc
Source 1\e1crcncc sensor Difference
(rvlcdium) ("F) ("F) ("F)
Probe AIR 71 71 0
AIR 71 70 I
Stack ICE W."-TER 33 34 I
BOIL \\'.-\TER 204 204 0
SILICONE OIL
Type S Pilot Tube lnspcc1io11 Data
l'itol Tube ldcnti fication: 38G ------------
D, Technician: --------'-M....;·....;M-'-cN_m_n_a_ra ______ _
_o..:•_= ____ o_.,_'7_5 __ 111. ls PA = PR ? ____ Y_c_s ___ _
Is 1.05 • D, s: P,, & P11 S: 1.50 • D,? Y cs ---------PA= 0.479 in. ---------
PB= 0.479 in.
Z s:0.125 in. Z = __ 0:..:..0;;..;..;I 8'---_in.
~7 -==· -··-··-··-,.., W $ 0.03 I 25 in. \V = 0.002 in. ------
\V > 3 inci1L'S W= 4 in. ------
Z > 3/4 inch Z = 0.875 in. ------
0
◄--Y?:: 3 inches y = _ ___;3:.._3;;_/_4 __ i 11.
l 11,· pilot tube meets the spcci lie at ions for a calibration !actor of 0.84? __ )_'c_s_
Tcmpcrmurc Sensor Calibration
Rclcrcnce Omega Cl 351 J A -
l'rnhc Cominuity Check Yes
Hem Check 248 Yes
t cmpcraturc 1cmocmiurc I cmpcraturc
Source l<clcrcncc Sensor Difference
(Medium) ("F) ("I') (OF)
Probe AIR 64 64 0
AIR 64 63 I
Staci. ICE W/\TER 33 33 0
13011. WATER 204 205 I
SILICONE 011.
l>ale.
D,
I
'
1/16/101-1 -------
.l PA '
Type S Pi101 Tube I nspcction Data
Pilot Tube Identification: ____ ___:3cc8_Gc:..-..c2 ____ _
Technician: M. McNamara
_D-',_~ ____ 0_.3_7_5 __ in. Is PA = P8 ? ____ Y_c_·s ___ _
Is I.OS · D, :;. P" & P,. ~ 1.50 • D,? ____ Y_e_s ___ _
PA= 0.456 in.
i'n = 0.456 Ill.
a1<10° a 1 = -----a1< 10° u2 = _____ _
Z ~ 0.125 in.
W S 0.03125 in.
W > 3 inches
Z > 3/4 inch
Z = __ ..:.0:.::.0..:..12=--Ill.
W = __ ..:;.o;...;.0..:;0..;.8 __ in.
W = __ ___;6::...._ __ in.
Z = __ .::.;o·c::8.:..c75=---_ in.
,-----o
:------rn f1 1-0 l.J lJll ---Y 2: 3 inches Y = __ 4___;1.;..;/2=----in.
I he p,101 lube meets the specilications for a calihra1ion l"ac1or of0.84? Yes
Tcmpcra1ure Sensor Calibration
, -Rcfon:ncc· Omcea Cl 351 J 1\
Probe Conlinuily Check Yes
I !cat Check 248 Yes
I cmpcraturc I cmperature 1 cmpcrnturc
Source Rclcrcncc Sensor Difference
{Medium) ("F) ("f) (or-)
Probe i\lR 7 1 70 I
AIR 7 1 72 I
Stack IC!: WATER 33 33 0
BOIL WATER 204 204 ()
SILICONE OIL
TETCO
Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration
[late: l/?/24 Calibrn1or: Xuan N . Dant! Rclcrcncc: Omega CL3512A
Thermocouple Temperature Temperature Temperature
llnit ID Location Source Reference Sensor Difference
Plellium) ("F) ("F) (°I')
Water 33 ~, 0 Oven (3) .>.)
A Water 203 201 -2
Water 33 33 ~ Oven (4) Water 203 201
Oven (3) Water 33 33
B Water 203 202
Water 33 33 ~ Oven (4) Water 203 201
Oven (3) Water 33 33
C Water 203 203
Waier 33 33 ~ Oven(4) Water 203 203
Oven (3) Water 33 33
D Water 203 203
Water 33 33 ~ Ovcn(4) Water 203 203
Oven (3) Water 33 33
E Water 203 203
Water 33 33 0 Oven (4) Water 203 203 0
F Ov..:11 Water 33 33 0
Water 203 202 -1
G Oven Water 33 33 0
Wakr 203 202 -I
H Water '' 33 0 Oven .).)
Water 203 203 0
lmpinger Out A Water 33 33 0
Water 203 203 0
lmpingcr Out 13 Water 33 33 0
Water 203 202 -I
Impingcr Out C Water 33 33 0
Water 203 202 -1
lmpinger Out D Watt:r 33 33 0
Water 203 203 0
lmpinger Out E Watt:r 33 34 I
Water 203 203 0
lmpinger Out F Water 33 33 0
Water 203 201 -2
lmpingcr Out G Water 33 33 0
Water 203 202 -1
lmpinger Out 1-1 Water 33 33 0
Water 203 203 0
lmping..:r Out I Water 33 33 0
Water 203 203 0
lmpingcr Out J Water 33 33 0
Water 203 203 0
lmpinger Out K Water 33 33 0
'Nater 203 203 0
TETCO
Annual Balance Calibration Check
Date 1 /23/24
Balance Denver Instruments, Model A-250, SN 8045284
Weights Used Troemner Weight Set,
SN 98-11 5146
Certified Weight
grams
0.1 000
0.5000
1.0000
10.0000
50.0000
100.0000
120.0000
150.0000
Technician Michael McNamara
Measured Weight
grams
0.1000
0.5000
1.0000
10.0000
50.0001
100.0000
120.0001
150.0000
Difference
grams
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
-0.0001
0.0000
-0.0001
0.0000

F
APPENDIX F

The testing protocol and other correspondence related to the tests are included here.
State of Utah
SPENCER J. COX
Govcr1101·
DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Gove.n1ru·
June 18, 2024
Mike Jones
Department of
Environmental Quality
Kimberly D. Shelley
E'Cecuti'ie Director
DIVISION OF AJR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird
Direclor
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Incorporated
2010 North Rulon White Boulevard
Ogden, UT 84404
Dear Mr. Jones:
DAQC-580-24
Site ID 10919 (B4)
Re: Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Incorporated-Ogden Plant I Forming Baghouses #I, #2, #3,
#4, and #6; Collector Baghouses #5 and #8 -Protocol Review and Test Date
Confirmation -Weber County
The testing protocol for the Forming Baghouses #1, #2, #3, #4, and #6 and Collector Baghouses
#5 and #8 at the Kimberly-Clark Ogden Plant received June 10, 2024, has been reviewed and
found acceptable. The agreed upon test date is the week of September 30, 2024.
Acceptance of a protocol does not relieve the owner/operator and the testing contractor from strict
adherence to all applicable EPA methods, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) policies, Utah Air
Quality Rules (UAQR), and methods approved by the Director. Any deviation from EPA
methods, DAQ policies, UAQR, and methods approved by the Director must be addressed
separately and express written consent given prior to commencement of testing.
The DAQ requires that all test reports include a statement stating that:
A. Testing was conducted while the source was operating at the rate and/or conditions
specified in the applicable approval order, operating pennit, or federal regulation.
B. During testing, the source combusted fuels, used raw materials, and maintained
process conditions representative of nonnal operations, and operated w1der such
other relevant conditions specified by the Director.
C. Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquity, the statements
-and information contained in the report are true, accurate, and complete.
• 195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
l-v.irw.deq.ulah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
DAQC-580-24
Page 2
If you have any questions, call me at [phone] or e-mail me at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Kyle Greenberg, Environmental Scientist
Division of Air Quality
KG:jl
cc: Weber-Morgan Health Department
COMPLIANCE EMISSION TESTING PROTOCOL
FOR TOTAL PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
KIMBERLY-CLARK, OGDEN, UTAH

FORMING BAGHOUSES #1, #2, #3, #4 AND #6
COLLECTOR BAGHOUSES #5 AND #8

Project Organization and Responsibility

The following personnel and the testing contractor are presently anticipated to be involved in the
testing program. The Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality
(DAQ) and EPA may have their own personnel to observe all phases including the process.

Company
Contacts
Kimberly-Clark Corp. Mike Jones 801 786-2318
2010 North Rulon White Blvd.
Ogden, Utah 84404

TETCO Dean Kitchen 801 492-9106
391 East 620 South
American Fork, Utah 84003

Facility Location and Description

These tests will be conducted to determine the PM10 emissions from six (7) baghouses at
Kimberly-Clark’s Ogden plant. The baghouse exhaust stacks are located on the building roof
and are identified as Forming Baghouses #1, #2, #3, #4, #6 and Collector Baghouses #5 and #8.

Test Objective

This test is being conducted to comply with the requirements of the Kimberly-Clark’s Approval
Order number DAQE-AN0109190023-23. This permit requires testing for particulate emissions
from each baghouse exhaust every five years. EPA Method 5 will be used with all particulate
matter captured counted as PM10. Testing procedures will include accumulating process and
production data.

Previous testing on these baghouses have demonstrated that the gas is ambient air. Stack
temperatures are a factor of the season and weather and not process oriented. With this
consideration it is proposed that condensable particulate matter testing not be completed on these
sources.

2
Special Conditions

The five Forming Baghouses (#1, #2, #3, #4 and #6) are identical in configuration and do not
meet the minimum requirement that the sampling ports be at least two diameters downstream of
the nearest flow disturbance. The inside diameter of these stacks is 36 inches. There are 62
inches (1.7 diameters) of unrestricted flow before the sampling ports and 18 inches (0.5
diameters) of unrestricted flow after the ports. See Facility Schematic Representation in
Appendix A. In order to meet the EPA specification of undisturbed flow before the sampling
ports, egg crate straightening vanes were installed 24 inches below the sample ports as described
in Method 5D. The straightening vanes cell size is 6 inches.

Test Schedule

It is planned to complete this testing project the week of September 30, 2024. The testing crew
will take preliminary measurements prior to testing each exhaust stack. More than one stack
may be tested at the same time but simultaneous testing is not a requirement of this protocol.

If necessary, a pretest meeting may be scheduled by EPA, DAQ, or Kimberly-Clark.

Operational Data and Instrumentation

Kimberly-Clark will be responsible for recording production data. The following table identifies
which manufacturing lines are controlled by each baghouse.

Manufacturing Line Baghouse #

Lines 1 and 2

Forming Baghouse # 1 Lines 3 and 4 Forming Baghouse # 2
Lines 5 and 6 Forming Baghouse # 3
Lines 7 and 8 Forming Baghouse # 4
Reclaim

Forming Baghouse # 6 Baghouses 1-4 and 6 bottoms Collector Baghouse # 5 or # 8

Testing may be conducted when one or both diaper lines served by the baghouse are in
operation. All operational and instrumentation data will be made available to DAQ personnel.

3

Site Access

The test site is on the building roof and is accessed via OSHA approved stairs or ladders.

Test Procedures

Three test runs will be completed on the each exhaust stack. Stack testing will follow EPA
Method 5 as specified in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A. Detailed procedures are as follows:

1. The stack diameters of Forming Baghouse #1-#4 and #6 are 36 inches. The ports are
located 18 inches (0.5 diameters) upstream from the next disturbance and 24 inches (4.0
diameters) downstream from the straightening vanes. Twelve traverse points will be
sampled from each port for a total of 24 sample points.

The stack diameters of Collector Baghouses #5 and #8 are 24 inches. The sampling ports
are located 30 inches (1.25 diameters) upstream from the next disturbance and 48 inches
(2.0 diameters) downstream from the last disturbance. Twelve traverse points will be
sampled from each port for a total of 24 sample points.

2. EPA Method 2 will be used to determine the gas stream velocity. In connection with
Method 2, type "S" pilot tubes will be used with a factor of .84. Dual inclined/vertical
manometers with graduations in .01 of an inch of water will be used. If the flows are
below 0.05 inches of water a more sensitive manometer may be used as per Method 2,
section 6.2. The graduation marks on it are .005 inches of water. Direction of gas flow
will be checked for gas cyclonics prior to testing. If the average deviation is over 20
degrees, then straightening vanes will be installed or other arrangements agreeable to
DAQ will be made.

3. Each test run time will be 2 hours (120 minutes). The sample volume will be at least 30
dscf for each test run.

4. The exhaust gas is ambient air. TETCO will use a dry molecular weight of 28.84 lb/lb
mole (20.0 % O2, 79.1 % N2) in all calculations.

5. Method 4 will be used to determine the gas stream moisture content

6. A barometer will be used to measure the barometric pressure. It is periodically checked
against a mercury barometer. Prior to testing it will be checked to assure an accurate
barometric pressure.

7. Calibration data is provided with this protocol. Equipment calibrations that fall past due
prior to the test dates, will be recalibrated prior to being used. Any calibrations not

4
included with this protocol, such as new or additional equipment, will be made available
to DAQ representatives upon request.

8. The glass fiber filters that will be used meet or exceed the requirements specified in EPA
Method 5.

9. The probe liners are of 316 grade stainless steel.

10. Preparation and clean up by the contractor will be performed in the contractor's testing
trailer. Laboratory work and analysis will be performed by the testing contractor as soon
as possible after all tests have been completed.

11. If maintenance or operating problems arise during the test, the test may be stopped. This
determination will be made by Kimberly-Clark representatives and operating personnel in
consultation with DAQ representatives.

12. Verbal results will be reported to Mike Jones of Kimberly-Clark. The written report will
follow within 30 days following the completion of the test.

Estimates of Test Parameters

Estimates of stack exhaust parameters are given below. These values are estimates only and are
not intended to reflect permitted values.

Source

Velocity (fpm)

Temperature F

Moisture %

Forming Baghouse #1

2,500

100

1
Forming Baghouse #2

2,500

105

1
Forming Baghouse #3 2,500 105 1
Forming Baghouse #4

3,400

105

1
Forming Baghouse #6

2,700

100

1
Collector Baghouse #5

1,900

95

1 Collector Baghouse #8 2,200 100 1

5
Potential Hazards

Moving Equipment – No Chemical - No
Hot Equipment – No Other - No

Quality Assurance

All testing and analysis in these tests will be conducted according to Methods 1-5 and
appropriate sections of the EPA Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement
Systems Vol. III.

Reporting

Reporting will be prepared by the testing contractor according to EPA Quality Assurance
Guidelines. A complete copy of raw data and test calculations summary will be included in the
reports. All process and production data will be recorded and retained by Kimberly-Clark
personnel for inspection by DAQ and EPA, if requested.

6
Appendix A

Source Schematics
Facility:
Stack Identification:

24"
Straightening
Vanes
Kimberly-Clark
1
105-115
2,200-3,300
Forming Baghouses #1-#4 and #6
18"
62"
a: Distance upstream from next disturbance, inches
b: Distance downstream from last disturbance, in.
10'g: Distance of Sample Level to ground, feet
Diaper ManufactureType:
Number of Ports
Process
Type:
Control Unit
2
Estimated Temperature, oF
Estimated Velocity, fpm
36"
Baghouse
 Stack Inside Diameter, inches
Estimated Moisture, percent
a
g
b
Figure 1. Facility Schematic Representation
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
t
i
-
-
-
Facility:
Stack Identification:
∅
Estimated Velocity, fpm
24"
Baghouse
∅: Stack Inside Diameter, inches
Estimated Moisture, percent
107
1,500
α: Distance upstream from next disturbance, inches
β: Distance downstream from last disturbance, in.
Diaper Manufacture Type:
Number of Ports
Process
Type:
Control Unit
2
Estimated Temperature, oF
12'γ: Distance of Sample Level to roof, feet
Kimberly-Clark
1
Collector Baghouse #5 and #8
30"
48"
α
γ
β
Figure 2. Facility Schematic Representation
-t i
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

7
Appendix B

Calibration Data
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.
TECHNICIAN:INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)
DATE:12/21/2023 METER SERIAL #:300315 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg):25.55 25.65 25.60 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,
METER PART #:Console 3 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #:1453S EQUIPMENT ID #:ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
K'TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED
FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3)AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN)DGM DH (1)(2)(3)Y
ORIFICE #RUN #(AVG)(in Hg)INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG q (in H2O)Vm (STD)Vcr (STD)Y VARIATION (%)DH@
1 0.8137 10 100.418 105.533 5.115 71 82 87 75 78 80.5 4.759 3.00 4.3128 4.3028 0.998 1.740
2 0.8137 10 105.533 110.912 5.379 72 85 89 78 81 83.3 5.012 3.00 4.5125 4.5278 1.003 1.735
3 0.8137 10 110.912 117.512 6.600 72 90 93 80 83 86.5 6.081 3.00 5.5038 5.4935 0.998 1.724
AVG = 1.000 -0.18
1 0.5317 11 83.911 89.115 5.204 69 69 75 66 70 70.0 7.477 1.22 4.4522 4.4262 0.994 1.675
2 0.5317 11 89.115 94.226 5.111 71 74 79 71 74 74.5 7.282 1.22 4.3358 4.3027 0.992 1.668
3 0.5317 11 94.226 99.407 5.181 72 79 83 74 75 77.8 7.332 1.22 4.3686 4.3281 0.991 1.661
AVG = 0.992 -0.91
1 0.3307 13 117.962 123.015 5.053 74 90 89 82 84 86.3 11.603 0.45 4.1851 4.2521 1.016 1.561
2 0.3307 13 123.015 128.053 5.038 75 88 89 84 86 86.8 11.514 0.45 4.1688 4.2155 1.011 1.563
3 0.3307 13 128.053 133.107 5.054 75 89 90 86 87 88.0 11.508 0.45 4.1725 4.2133 1.010 1.559
AVG = 1.012 1.08
AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = 1.001
AVERAGE DH@ = 1.654
(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions
K1 =17.64 oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 oK/mm Hg (Metric)
Tm =Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric) DH@ = 0.75 q DH Vm(std)
Vcr(std) Vm
(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions
Tamb =Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric)
Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration REFERENCE IN OUT
(3)=DGM calibration factor 32 33 32
62 63 63
204 205 205
TEMPERATURE SENSORS oF
2024 Pre-Calibration
Console #3
30
19
12
D Kitchen
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical orifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.
()2 ()
I
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

-
I
I

D
[I
]

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

D ~
I
I
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

DJ
]

D
J
]

D
J
]

..
.
.
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1

[
I
]

[
I
]

[I
I
]

□
□
□

METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.
TECHNICIAN:INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)
DATE:12/7/2023 METER SERIAL #:68092 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg):25.65 25.65 25.65 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,
METER PART #:Console 6 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #:1453S EQUIPMENT ID #:ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
K'TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED
FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3)AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN)DGM DH (1)(2)(3)Y
ORIFICE #RUN #(AVG)(in Hg)INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG q (in H2O)Vm (STD)Vcr (STD)Y VARIATION (%)DH@
1 0.8137 10 204.981 213.255 8.274 71 71 84 69 71 73.8 7.75 2.90 7.0764 7.0215 0.992 1.700
2 0.8137 10 213.255 221.823 8.568 71 82 88 70 72 78.0 8.00 2.90 7.2699 7.2481 0.997 1.686
3 0.8137 10 221.823 226.926 5.103 71 86 88 72 72 79.5 4.75 2.90 4.3178 4.3035 0.997 1.682
AVG = 0.995 0.11
1 0.5317 11 184.867 190.097 5.230 69 72 80 69 71 73.0 7.50 1.20 4.4576 4.4485 0.998 1.635
2 0.5317 11 190.097 196.569 6.472 65 78 82 70 71 75.3 9.25 1.20 5.4930 5.5074 1.003 1.616
3 0.5317 11 196.569 204.797 8.228 65 79 84 70 72 76.3 11.75 1.20 6.9704 6.9959 1.004 1.613
AVG = 1.001 0.72
1 0.3307 13 227.035 233.113 6.078 72 83 80 72 72 76.8 13.75 0.43 5.1329 5.0582 0.985 1.509
2 0.3307 13 233.113 240.071 6.958 72 78 79 71 71 74.8 15.75 0.43 5.8980 5.7939 0.982 1.515
3 0.3307 13 240.071 245.134 5.063 72 78 89 71 71 77.3 11.50 0.43 4.2717 4.2305 0.990 1.508
AVG = 0.986 -0.83
AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = 0.994
AVERAGE DH@ = 1.607
(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions
K1 =17.64 oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 oK/mm Hg (Metric)
Tm =Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric) DH@ = 0.75 q DH Vm(std)
Vcr(std) Vm
(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions
Tamb =Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric)
K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration REFERENCE IN OUT
(3)=DGM calibration factor 32 33 32
72 73 73
203 203 202
TEMPERATURE SENSORS oF
2024 Pre-Calibration
Console #6
30
19
12
Reed Kitchen
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical orifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.
()2 ()
□
□
□

[I
I
]

[
I
I
]

[I
I
]

-
DJ
]

D
J
]

D
J
]

I
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

I
~
D
I

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

I
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

[I
]

D
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Date:Pitot Tube Identification:
Technician:
Dt=0.375 Is PA = PB ?
Is 1.05 • Dt  PA & PB  1.50 • Dt ?
PA = 0.455
PB =0.455
a1 < 10o a1 = o
a2 < 10o a2 = o
b1 < 5o b1 = o
b2 < 5o b2 = o
Z  0.125 in.Z = in.
W W  0.03125 in.W = in.
W > 3 inches W = in.
Z > 3/4 inch Z = in.
Y ≥ 3 inches Y = in.
The pitot tube meets the specifications for a calibration factor of 0.84?Yes
Reference:
TemperatureSource Reference Sensor
(Medium)(oF)(oF)
Probe AIR 71 71
AIR 71 70
ICE WATER 33 34
BOIL WATER 204 204
SILICONE OIL
1/3/2024 27 G-2
X. Dang
in.
0.016
0
0
2
2
0
in.
in.
Yes
Yes
0.016
6.875
0.875
3 3/4
Heat Check 248
Temperature Sensor Calibration
1
1
0Stack
Omega CL3512A
Probe Yes
Yes
Continuity Check
Temperature TemperatureDifference
(oF)
b2
b1
B
A
w
Dt
PA
PB
A
B
8"'
~ . '
I
I
_¥., ... -... , -1
U-LJlllll.lliUILJ ... ! ~-
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Date:Pitot Tube Identification:
Technician:
Dt=0.375 Is PA = PB ?
Is 1.05 • Dt  PA & PB  1.50 • Dt ?
PA = 0.479
PB =0.479
a1 < 10o a1 = o
a2 < 10o a2 = o
b1 < 5o b1 = o
b2 < 5o b2 = o
Z  0.125 in.Z = in.
W W  0.03125 in.W = in.
W > 3 inches W = in.
Z > 3/4 inch Z = in.
Y ≥ 3 inches Y = in.
The pitot tube meets the specifications for a calibration factor of 0.84?Yes
Reference:
TemperatureSource Reference Sensor
(Medium)(oF)(oF)
Probe AIR 64 64
AIR 64 63
ICE WATER 33 33
BOIL WATER 204 205
SILICONE OIL
Heat Check 248
Temperature Sensor Calibration
1
0
1Stack
Omega CL3512A
Probe Yes
Yes
Continuity Check
Temperature TemperatureDifference
(oF)
0
in.
in.
Yes
Yes
0.002
4
0.875
3 3/4
1/16/2024 38 G
M. McNamara
in.
0.018
1
1
2
1
b2
b1
B
A
w
Dt
PA
PB
A
B
....
Date:1/2/24 Calibrator:Reference:
Temperature Temperature
Source Difference
(Medium)(oF)
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water 0
Water 1
Water 0
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
202
33 33
Impinger Out K 33 33
203 203
33 33
Impinger Out J
Impinger Out H
Impinger Out I
33
203
33
203
33
203
33
203
203
201
33
G
H
Oven (3)33 33
203 203
Oven (4)33
203
Oven 33 33
203 203
Oven 33 33
33
203 202
Oven (3)
A
201203
33
Oven (3)33 33
Oven (4)
Thermocouple
Location
203 201
Impinger Out F 33 33
203
203
203
203 202
203 203
33
33
Impinger Out G
203 201
Oven (3)33
203 203
33 33
203Oven (4)
203
Impinger Out D 33 33
203 203
Impinger Out E 33 34
203 203
203
33 33
203Impinger Out B
Impinger Out C 33 33
203 202
202
Impinger Out A 33 33
203
Oven (3)
Oven (4)
TETCO
Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration
B
C 203 203
33 33
33 33
203
33 33
Xuan N. Dang Omega CL3512A
Unit ID Reference
(oF)
Sensor
(oF)
Temperature
33
D
E
Oven 33 33
203 202F
Oven (4)
Balance Denver Instruments, Model A-250, SN B045284
Weights Used Troemner Weight Set,
SN 98-115146
Certified Weight Measured Weight Difference
grams grams grams
0.1000 0.1000 0.0000
0.5000 0.5000 0.0000
1.0000 1.0000 0.0000
10.0000 10.0000 0.0000
50.0000 50.0001 -0.0001
100.0000 100.0000 0.0000
120.0000 120.0001 -0.0001
150.0000 150.0000 0.0000
Technician Michael McNamara
TETCO
Annual Balance Calibration Check
Date 1/23/24