Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDERR-2025-001204 WSP USA Inc. 10876 S River Front Parkway South Jordan, Utah 84095 wsp.com February 10, 2025 Mr. Kevin Beery Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Environmental Response and Remediation 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Mr. Brett Gurney Utah Department of Government Operations Division of Fleet Operations, State of Utah Fuel Network 447 West 13800 South Draper, Utah 84020 Re: Free Product Recovery Report Former UDOT Maintenance Station No. 324 375 West Main Street, Escalante, Utah Facility Identification No. 6000243, Release Site HJT Dear Mr. Beery and Mr. Gurney: WSP USA Inc. (WSP) is pleased to submit this report for free product recovery events at the former Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) maintenance station No. 324, Escalante, Utah (Site). The Site has Facility Identification No. 6000243, Release Site HJT. This report presents the results of a free product recovery events conducted on December 4, 2024 by Aggressive Fluid Vapor Recovery (AFVR) technology. The free product recovery events were conducted in accordance with the Utah Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) approved Work Plan and Budget (WP&B) HJT-37, dated January 24, 2024, and Amendment 1 (HJT-37.1) dated June 24, 2024. 1.0 Background Release HJT was reported for the Site in November 1992, following the removal from the Site of one 3,000-gallon diesel-fuel underground storage tank (UST) and one 3,000-gallon gasoline UST. Starting in 1993, Light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL) were encountered in several monitoring wells on the Site. A soil vapor extraction (SVE) system operated on the Site from 1998 through 2004. Following the shutdown of the SVE system in 2004, LNAPL recharge has occurred in six monitoring wells at the Site: MW-1, MW-3, MW-7, MW-9, MW-10, and MW-13 (Figure 1). Three other monitoring wells exhibited measurable LNAPL for some time between 2004 and September 2023:  MW-4 – measurable LNAPL of 0.01 ft was found in 2017; there was no measurable LNAPL in monitoring events from 2019 to 2023.  MW-15 – measurable LNAPL was found in 2008; the monitoring well was reported to be destroyed in 2010.  MW-18 – measurable LNAPL was found in 2010; there was no measurable LNAPL in monitoring events from 2013 to 2023. In September 2023, measurable LNAPL was found in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-7, MW-9, MW-10, and MW-13 with a thickness that ranged between 0.17 to 2.20 feet. The type of LNAPL consisted of low boiling point hydrocarbons in the form of gasoline. LNAPL were recovered using hand bailers during the September 2023 sampling event. Two eight-hour AFVR events were conducted at the Site by Sump and Trap Cleaning LLC (Sump and Trap) under the supervision of WSP on March 19 and April 16, 2024; a total of approximately 4.5 gallons of hydrocarbon product were recovered from the on-Site monitoring wells in these two AVFR events1. Approximately three weeks after the April 16th event, on May 6, 2024, measurable LNAPL was found in monitoring wells MW-3, MW-7, MW-9, MW-10, and MW-13 with a thickness that ranged between 0.01 to 0.14 feet. 2.0 Aggressive Fluid Vapor Recovery Activities Additional two eight-hour AFVR events were conducted at the Site by Sump and Trap under the supervision of WSP on August 13, 2024 and on December 4, 2024. The AFVR activities were performed utilizing a liquid ring vacuum pump (Fruitland RCF 500 series), 3-inch diameter discharge stack, a 3,000-gallon capacity tanker, 1-inch flexible vacuum hoses for stingers, well head seals, and 1-inch and 2-inch flexible vacuum hoses for manifolding multiple wells. The AFVR system was rated at 338 cubic feet per minute (cfm) free air flow at maximum vacuum of 28.5 inches of mercury (“ Hg). During each event, measurements of relative humidity, temperature, vacuum, exhaust velocity and off-gas vapor concentrations were collected at the discharge stack at half hour intervals and recorded on a field log. A copy of the field logs is provided as Appendix A. 2.1 August 2024 AFVR Event Monitor wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-7, MW-9, MW-10, and MW-13 were used as extraction wells and MW-8, MW-19, and MW-21 were used as observation wells during the August 2024 AFVR event. Due to the number of wells with LNAPL and the depth to the LNAPL-water interface, the extraction wells were divided into two groups; monitoring wells in each group were manifolded together and pumped continuously for a four-hour period. System vacuum was measured between 15- and 16-inches Hg for Group 1 and Group 2. Vacuum at the observation wells were 0 inches Hg. The stinger pipes depths ranged from 42 feet to 47 feet below ground surface (bgs) for Group 1 and 45 feet to 52 feet bgs for Group 2. The measured parameters of the vac truck effluent during the event are summarized by group in Table 1a. 1 WSP. Free Product Recovery Report, Former UDOT Maintenance Station No. 324, 375 West Main Street, Escalante, Utah, Facility Identification No. 6000243, Release Site HJT. May 21, 2024 Table 1a: Summary of Effluent Parameters (4-hour extraction per group), August 2024 Parameter Unit Group 1: MW-1, MW-7, MW-9 Group 2: MW-3, MW-10, MW-13 Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Velocity ft/min 1,142 1,713 1,512 1,260 1,713 1,461 Temperature ˚F 130 165 155 145 175 157 Relative Humidity % 56 79 67 35 89 65 VOC ppm 226 304 268 152 331 233 A total of 109 gallons were extracted from the wells during the August 2024 AVFR event. No measurable LNAPL was found in the tanker at the end of the event, therefore the volume of recovered liquid product was estimated based on the LNAPL thickness in the wells (Appendix A). Calculation for estimating the volume of recovered hydrocarbons in the vapor phase are included in Appendix B. A total of 0.53 gallons of free product were recovered from the Site during the August 2024 event. Summary of recoveries during the August 2024 event are presented in Table 1b. Table 1b: Summary of Recoveries (gallons), August 2024 Group Time Total Volume Liquid Product1 Vaporized Product2 1 4 hours 96 0.20 0.095 2 4 hours 45 0.16 0.079 Total 141 0.36 0.174 1) Appendix A 2) Appendix B All wastewater was transported to a licensed facility for disposal by Sump and Trap. A copy of the disposal manifest is included in Appendix C. 2.2 December 2024 AFVR Event Approximately three weeks after the August 13 event, on September 5, 2024, the six wells with LNAPL that were used as extraction wells were gauged for LNAPL and depth to water. Measurable LNAPL was detected in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-7, MW-9, MW-10, and MW-13 with a thickness that ranged between 0.01 to 0.10 feet. Monitor wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-7, MW-9, MW-10, and MW-13 were used as extraction wells and MW-8, MW-19, and MW-21 were used as observation wells during the December 2024 AFVR event. The extraction wells were divided into two groups and monitoring wells in each group were manifolded together and pumped continuously for a four-hour period. System vacuum was measured between 14- and 16-inches Hg for Group 1 and Group 2. Vacuum at the observation wells were 0 inches Hg. The stinger pipes depths ranged from 42 feet to 46.5 feet bgs for Group 1 and 46 feet to 52 feet bgs for Group 2. The measured parameters of the vac truck effluent during the event are summarized by group in Table 2a. Table 2a: Summary of Effluent Parameters (4-hour extraction per group), December 2024 Parameter Unit Group 1: MW-1, MW-7, MW-9 Group 2: MW-3, MW-10, MW-13 Minimum Maximum Average Minimum Maximum Average Velocity ft/min 1,772 2, 343 2,109 1,693 1,929 1,831 Temperature ˚F 73 115 106 90 125 109 Relative Humidity % 31.13 69.43 60.43 40.42 73.60 64.92 VOC ppm 47 146 72 146 329 251 A total of 180 gallons were extracted from the wells during the December 2024 AVFR event. No measurable LNAPL was found in the tanker at the end of the event, therefore the volume of recovered liquid product was estimated based on the LNAPL thickness in the wells (Appendix A). Calculation for estimating the volume of recovered hydrocarbons in the vapor phase are included in Appendix B. A total of 0.205 gallons of free product were recovered from the Site during the December 2024 event. Summary of recoveries during the December 2024 event are presented in Table 2b. Table 2b: Summary of Recoveries (gallons), December 2024 Group Time Total Volume Liquid Product1 Vaporized Product2 1 4 hours 59 0.02 0.039 2 4 hours 62 0.03 0.116 Total 121 0.05 0.155 3) Appendix A 4) Appendix B All wastewater was transported to a licensed facility for disposal by Sump and Trap. A copy of the disposal manifest is included in Appendix C. 3.0 Conclusions Approximately 0.735 gallons of hydrocarbon product were recovered from the on-Site monitoring wells in the two AVFR events. Approximately six weeks after the December 4, 2024 event, on January 16, 2025, the monitoring wells were gauged for water levels and LNAPL thickness. Measurable LNAPL was detected in monitoring well MW-3, MW-7, MW-9, MW-10, and MW-13 with a thickness that ranged between 0.01 to 0.09 feet; Measurable LNAPL was not detected in monitoring well MW-1. WSP will continue to monitor the LNAPL recharge rate in the monitoring wells at the Site during the next groundwater monitoring event. Based on the findings of LNAPL recharge rate and amount, additional remedial measures may be recommended for the Site. Please contact Ehud Ardon at ehud.ardon@wsp.com if you have any questions or comments regarding this report. Respectfully submitted, WSP USA Inc. Rylie Burke Ehud Ardon Environmental Scientist Senior Environmental Scientist Certified UST GW and Soil Sampler #GS-1939 Certified UST Consultant # CC-279 Enclosures: Figure 1: Site Map Appendix A: Field Logs Appendix B: Vapor Phase Recovery Calculation Appendix C: Disposal Manifests [[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A Main Street 40 0 W e s t MW-3 MW-28 MW-1 MW-19 MW-18 MW-20A MW-10 MW-5 MW-8 MW-9 MW-4 MW-7 MW-12 MW-14 MW-21 MW-13 MW-15A MW-20 MW-6 MW-2 MW-11 MW-27 MW-17 MW-16 MW-25 MW-26 MW-24 MW-23 MW-22 ^ Vicinity Map Site Map Former UDOT Station No. 324324 West Main Street, Escalante, UtahFacility ID 6000243 Release Site HJT The map shown here has been created with all due and reasonable care and is strictly for use with WSP USA Environment & Infrastructure Inc. Project Number 2381400505. This map has not been certified by a licensed land surveyor, and any third party use of this map comes without warranties of any kind. WSP USA Environment & Infrastructure Inc. assumes no liability, direct or indirect, whatsoever for any such third party or unintended use. 2381400505 CB4/25/2023 Job No.PM:Date:Scale: FIGURE 1 Legend @A Monitoring Well @A Abandoned Well @A Destroyed Well [ [Fence 0 6030 Feet ± 1 inch = 100 feetThe imagery service is provided byGoogle as part of a licenseagreement with the State of Utah Former USTs Appendix A: Field Logs Event 3-Group 1 FIELD LOG Site:Former UDOT 324-Escalante Site WSP Personel:Rylie Burke Date:8/13/2024 Subcontractor:Sump and Trap Cleaning LLC Vac Truck System Specs (cfm @ in Hg): 338 cfm @ 28.5" HG Stack Diameter:3" Well ID Diam. (inch) Intial Depth to FP Intital Depth to Water Intital Stinger Depths Final Depth to FP Final Depth to water Final Stinger Depths FP Thickness (feet) FP Volume (gal)* Total Volume (gal) MW-1 4 44.28 44.29 46 0.00 47.54 46.5 0.01 0.01 MW-3 4 Group 2 MW-7 2 43.88 43.93 45 0.00 46.69 45 0.05 0.01 MW-9 2 38.92 40.04 42 0.00 43.00 42 1.12 0.18 MW-10 2 Group 2 MW-13 2 Group 2 Total:0.20 Well ID:Diam. (inch) Intital Depth to Water Final Depth to water MW-21 4 51.40 51.37 MW-8 2 44.96 44.94 MW-19 4 42.82 42.82 Notes Stinger adjusted deeper at MW-1 by ~4 inches at 10:50. No pressure changes at observation wells. *volume is calculated based on FP thickness and well diameter Measurable FP in tanker - sheen Date Time Time Into Event (Hours) Velocity (ft/min) Rel. Hum. (%)Temp (F) Stack VOCs (PPM) VAC (hg") MW-21 MW-8 MW-19 Start 830 0.0 -----0 0 0 900 0.5 1142 78.69 130 255 -15 0 0 0 930 1.0 1476 74.07 155 260 -15 0 0 0 1000 1.5 1555 71.75 160 262 -15 0 0 0 1030 2.0 1634 56.59 165 275 -15 0 0 0 1100 2.5 1516 56.25 160 304 -15 0 0 0 1130 3.0 1522 71.62 160 297 -15 0 0 0 1200 3.5 1535 66.90 155 264 -15 0 0 0 End 1230 4.0 1713 56.53 155 226 -16 0 0 0 Average 1512 66.55 155 268 -15 Minimum 1142 56.25 130 226 -16 Maximum 1713 78.69 165 304 -15 Extraction Wells Monitoring wells were divided into two groups due to the distance between wells and depth to water. Each group was pumped for 4 hours. Observation Wells Observation wells (Hg") Field Parameters 49 Page 1 Event 3-Group 2 FIELD LOG Site:Former UDOT 324-Escalante Site WSP Personel:Rylie Burke Date:8/13/2024 Subcontractor:Sump and Trap Cleaning LLC Vac Truck System Specs (cfm @ in Hg): 338 cfm @ 28.5" HG Stack Diameter:3" Well ID Diam. (inch) Intial Depth to FP^ Intital Depth to Water Intital Stinger Depths Final Depth to FP Final Depth to water Final Stinger Depths FP Thickness (feet)^ FP Volume (gal)* Total Volume (gal) MW-1 4 Group1 MW-3 4 49.79 49.81 52 52.34 52 0.02 0.01 MW-7 2 Group1 MW-9 2 Group1 MW-10 2 43.05 43.92 45 45.63 45 0.87 0.14 MW-13 2 49.67 49.71 51 53.20 51 0.04 0.01 Total:0.16 Well ID:Diam. (inch) Intital Depth to Water Final Depth to water MW-21 4 51.40 51.37 MW-8 2 44.96 44.94 MW-19 4 42.82 42.82 Notes No adjustments made to stinger height. No water level/pressure changes noted in observation wells. *volume is calculated based on FP thickness and well diameter Measurable FP in tanker - film, a bit more than a sheen and heavy odors Date Time Time Into Event (Hours) Velocity (ft/min) Rel. Hum. (%)Temp (F) Stack VOCs (PPM) VAC (hg") MW-21 MW-8 MW-19 Start 1300 4.5 1713 67.32 145 328 -15 0 0 0 1330 5.0 1673 89.38 145 331 -15 0 0 0 1400 5.5 1555 82.60 145 287 -16 0 0 0 1430 6.0 1319 76.19 155 232 -16 0 0 0 1500 6.5 1299 34.89 155 218 -16 0 0 0 1530 7.0 1378 68.76 160 204 -16 0 0 0 1600 7.5 1260 62.41 160 184 -16 0 0 0 1630 8.0 1398 48.27 170 160 -16 0 0 0 End 1700 8.5 1555 56.04 175 152 -16 0 0 0 Average 1461 65.10 157 233 -16 Minimum 1260 34.89 145 152 -16 Maximum 1713 89.38 175 331 -15 Observation wells (Hg") Extraction Wells 60 Observation Wells Monitoring wells were divided into two groups due to the distance between wells and depth to water. Each group was pumped for 4 hours. Field Parameters Page 5 Event 4-Group 1 FIELD LOG Site:Former UDOT 324-Escalante Site WSP Personel:Emerson Codding Date:12/4/2024 Subcontractor:Sump and Trap Cleaning LLC Vac Truck System Specs (cfm @ in Hg): 338 cfm @ 28.5" HG Stack Diameter:3" Well ID Diam. (inch) Intial Depth to FP Intital Depth to Water Intital Stinger Depths Final Depth to FP Final Depth to water Final Stinger Depths FP Thickness (feet) FP Volume (gal)* Total Volume (gal) MW-1 4 44.33 44.34 46.34 0.00 47.42 48.34 0.01 0.01 MW-3 4 Group 2 MW-7 2 43.79 43.80 45.80 44.70 44.70 45.80 0.01 0.00 MW-9 2 40.71 40.75 42.75 0.00 40.31 42.75 0.04 0.01 MW-10 2 Group 2 MW-13 2 Group 2 Total:0.02 Well ID:Diam. (inch) Intital Depth to Water Final Depth to water MW-21 4 51.50 51.49 MW-8 2 44.73 44.74 MW-19 4 42.76 42.72 Notes *volume is calculated based on FP thickness and well diameter Measurable FP in tanker - sheen Date Time Time Into Event (Hours) Velocity (ft/min) Rel. Hum. (%)Temp (F) Stack VOCs (PPM) VAC (hg") MW-21 MW-8 MW-19 Start 1240 4.5 -----0 0 0 1310 5.0 1910 51.68 73 146 -14 0 0 0 1340 5.5 2185 31.13 110 86 -14 0 0 0 1410 6.0 2146 69.43 110 50 -14 0 0 0 1440 6.5 2343 65.25 115 61 -14 0 0 0 1510 7.0 2146 65.98 115 87 -16 0 0 0 1540 7.5 2343 66.59 115 53 -16 0 0 0 1610 8.0 1772 67.52 110 47 -16 0 0 0 End 1640 8.5 2028 65.83 100 48 -15 0 0 0 Average 2109 60.43 106 72 -15 Minimum 1772 31.13 73 47 -16 Maximum 2343 69.43 115 146 -14 Extraction Wells Monitoring wells were divided into two groups due to the distance between wells and depth to water. Each group was pumped for 4 hours. Observation Wells Observation wells (Hg") Field Parameters Initial stinger depths set to ~ 2 feet below FP-water interface. At 1345 MW-1 stinger was lowered ~ 1 foot to ~ 47.3 feet below grade. No pressure changes at observation wells. 59 Page 1 Event 4-Group 2 FIELD LOG Site:Former UDOT 324-Escalante Site WSP Personel:Emerson Codding Date:12/4/2024 Subcontractor:Sump and Trap Cleaning LLC Vac Truck System Specs (cfm @ in Hg): 338 cfm @ 28.5" HG Stack Diameter:3" Well ID Diam. (inch) Intial Depth to FP^ Intital Depth to Water Intital Stinger Depths Final Depth to FP Final Depth to water Final Stinger Depths FP Thickness (feet)^ FP Volume (gal)* Total Volume (gal) MW-1 4 Group1 MW-3 4 49.73 49.74 52 0.00 51.84 52 0.01 0.01 MW-7 2 Group1 MW-9 2 Group1 MW-10 2 43.52 43.59 46 46.08 46.09 46 0.07 0.01 MW-13 2 49.47 49.52 52 0.00 54.20 52 0.05 0.01 Total:0.03 Well ID:Diam. (inch) Intital Depth to Water Final Depth to water MW-21 4 51.51 51.51 MW-8 2 44.81 44.81 MW-19 4 42.79 42.79 Notes No adjustments made to stinger height. No water level/pressure changes noted in observation wells. *volume is calculated based on FP thickness and well diameter Measurable FP in tanker - film, a bit more than a sheen and heavy odors Date Time Time Into Event (Hours) Velocity (ft/min) Rel. Hum. (%)Temp (F) Stack VOCs (PPM) VAC (hg") MW-21 MW-8 MW-19 Start 850 0 -----0 0 0 920 0.5 1870 69.90 105 297 -15 0 0 0 950 1.0 1732 63.64 115 247 -15 0 0 0 1020 1.5 1870 65.27 110 316 -15 0 0 0 1050 2.0 1870 66.57 100 315 -15 0 0 0 1120 2.5 1929 67.00 125 329 -15 0 0 0 1150 3.0 1929 73.60 115 195 -15 0 0 0 1220 3.5 1693 40.42 110 163 -15 0 0 0 End 1250 4.0 1752 72.96 90 146 -15 0 0 0 Average 1831 64.92 109 251 -15 Minimum 1693 40.42 90 146 -15 Maximum 1929 73.60 125 329 -15 Observation wells (Hg") Extraction Wells 121 Observation Wells Monitoring wells were divided into two groups due to the distance between wells and depth to water. Each group was pumped for 4 hours. Field Parameters Page 2 Appendix B: Vapor Phase Recovery Calculation Sheets Data Entry (Enter data into shaded cells only) Bwsw = lb. Water/lb. Dry air =0.0297 lb./lb. (from chart; humidity measured by probe) Bws = water vapor as % by volume = 0.0454 %(from guidelines) V = velocity in ft/min = 1512 fpm (from Manometer) V = velocity in ft/sec = 25.20 fps (from Manometer) d = diameter of discharge [in.] =3 in.(diameter of exhaust pipe) A = cross-sec. Area of discharge =0.0491 sq. ft. (Area of exhaust pipe) Ts = stack Temp. degrees R = 615 deg. R (from guidelines) Tf = stack Temp. deg. F =155 deg. F (from Temp. probe) PPMw = ppm measured = 268 ppm (from PID meter) 1. Calculate Flow as Dry Standard Cubic Feet Per Minute (DSCFM). Qstd = flow at DSCFM = 60.8 dscfm 2. Determine Pollutant mass Removal Rate as Gasoline (PMRg). PPMw = PPMm = obtained value from PID meter = "wet" concentration = 268 PPMd = (PPMw)/(1-Bws) = "dry concentration = 281 K = # carbons in calibration gas = Isobutylene = 4) = 4 PPMc = (PPMd)*(K) = PPMv, vol. Conc. Of VOCs as carbon, dry@STP =1123 Mc = 12.01 mg/mg-mol, mw of carbon =12.0 K3 = 24.07 dscm/1E6 mg-mg-mol, mass to vol. Conv. Factor @STP =24.1 Ccm = PPMc*(Mc/K3) = mg/dscm, mass conc. Of VOC as carbon = 560 Cc = Ccm*(62.43E-9 lb.-m3/mg-ft3) = lb./dscf, mass conc. Of VOCs as carbon, dry@STP =3.50E-05 PMRc = Cc*Qstd*60 min/hr) = lb./hr, poll. Mass rem. Rate of VOCs as carbon =0.1277 Mg = 103 mg/mg-mol, mw of gasoline (value may vary depending on contaminant) =103 Mcg = 89 mg/mg-mol, weight of carbon in gasoline molecule =89 PMRg = PMRg = (PMRc)*(Mg/Mcg) = lb./hr, pollutant mass removal rate of VOCs as gasoline = 0.1478 lb./hr 3. Convert lbs. Of gasoline emissions to gallons of liquid gasoline. PMRgl = PMRgl = (PMRg)*(gal/6.25 lbs.) =Mass Removal Rate as Gasoline in Gallons/hour =0.02364 gal/hr Duration of Event (hrs)4 Total Gal Discharge AfvrEmis 0.095 Gallons AIR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS FORMER UDOT 324, 324 WEST MAIN STREET, ESCALANTE, UTAH 3RD EVENT-GROUP 1 13-Aug-24 Data Entry (Enter data into shaded cells only) Bwsw = lb. Water/lb. Dry air =0.0297 lb./lb. (from chart; humidity measured by probe) Bws = water vapor as % by volume = 0.0454 %(from guidelines) V = velocity in ft/min = 1512 fpm (from Manometer) V = velocity in ft/sec = 25.20 fps (from Manometer) d = diameter of discharge [in.] =3 in.(diameter of exhaust pipe) A = cross-sec. Area of discharge =0.0491 sq. ft. (Area of exhaust pipe) Ts = stack Temp. degrees R = 615 deg. R (from guidelines) Tf = stack Temp. deg. F =155 deg. F (from Temp. probe) PPMw = ppm measured = 268 ppm (from PID meter) 1. Calculate Flow as Dry Standard Cubic Feet Per Minute (DSCFM). Qstd = flow at DSCFM = 60.8 dscfm 2. Determine Pollutant mass Removal Rate as Gasoline (PMRg). PPMw = PPMm = obtained value from PID meter = "wet" concentration = 268 PPMd = (PPMw)/(1-Bws) = "dry concentration = 281 K = # carbons in calibration gas = Isobutylene = 4) = 4 PPMc = (PPMd)*(K) = PPMv, vol. Conc. Of VOCs as carbon, dry@STP =1123 Mc = 12.01 mg/mg-mol, mw of carbon =12.0 K3 = 24.07 dscm/1E6 mg-mg-mol, mass to vol. Conv. Factor @STP =24.1 Ccm = PPMc*(Mc/K3) = mg/dscm, mass conc. Of VOC as carbon = 560 Cc = Ccm*(62.43E-9 lb.-m3/mg-ft3) = lb./dscf, mass conc. Of VOCs as carbon, dry@STP =3.50E-05 PMRc = Cc*Qstd*60 min/hr) = lb./hr, poll. Mass rem. Rate of VOCs as carbon =0.1277 Mg = 103 mg/mg-mol, mw of gasoline (value may vary depending on contaminant) =103 Mcg = 89 mg/mg-mol, weight of carbon in gasoline molecule =89 PMRg = PMRg = (PMRc)*(Mg/Mcg) = lb./hr, pollutant mass removal rate of VOCs as gasoline = 0.1478 lb./hr 3. Convert lbs. Of gasoline emissions to gallons of liquid gasoline. PMRgl = PMRgl = (PMRg)*(gal/6.25 lbs.) =Mass Removal Rate as Gasoline in Gallons/hour =0.02364 gal/hr Duration of Event (hrs)4 Total Gal Discharge AfvrEmis 0.095 Gallons AIR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS FORMER UDOT 324, 324 WEST MAIN STREET, ESCALANTE, UTAH 3RD EVENT-GROUP 2 13-Aug-24 Data Entry (Enter data into shaded cells only) Bwsw = lb. Water/lb. Dry air = 0.0252 lb./lb. (from chart; humidity measured by probe) Bws = water vapor as % by volume = 0.0388 % (from guidelines) V = velocity in ft/min = 2109 fpm (from Manometer) V = velocity in ft/sec = 35.15 fps (from Manometer) d = diameter of discharge [in.] = 3 in. (diameter of exhaust pipe) A = cross-sec. Area of discharge = 0.0491 sq. ft. (Area of exhaust pipe) Ts = stack Temp. degrees R = 566 deg. R (from guidelines) Tf = stack Temp. deg. F = 106 deg. F (from Temp. probe) PPMw = ppm measured = 72 ppm (from PID meter) 1. Calculate Flow as Dry Standard Cubic Feet Per Minute (DSCFM). Qstd = flow at DSCFM = 92.8 dscfm 2. Determine Pollutant mass Removal Rate as Gasoline (PMRg). PPMw = PPMm = obtained value from PID meter = "wet" concentration = 72 PPMd = (PPMw)/(1-Bws) = "dry concentration = 75 K = # carbons in calibration gas = Isobutylene = 4) = 4 PPMc = (PPMd)*(K) = PPMv, vol. Conc. Of VOCs as carbon, dry@STP =300 Mc = 12.01 mg/mg-mol, mw of carbon = 12.0 K3 = 24.07 dscm/1E6 mg-mg-mol, mass to vol. Conv. Factor @STP = 24.1 Ccm = PPMc*(Mc/K3) = mg/dscm, mass conc. Of VOC as carbon = 150 Cc = Ccm*(62.43E-9 lb.-m3/mg-ft3) = lb./dscf, mass conc. Of VOCs as carbon, dry@STP =9.33E-06 PMRc = Cc*Qstd*60 min/hr) = lb./hr, poll. Mass rem. Rate of VOCs as carbon =0.0520 Mg = 103 mg/mg-mol, mw of gasoline (value may vary depending on contaminant) = 103 Mcg = 89 mg/mg-mol, weight of carbon in gasoline molecule = 89 PMRg = PMRg = (PMRc)*(Mg/Mcg) = lb./hr, pollutant mass removal rate of VOCs as gasoline = 0.0602 lb./hr 3. Convert lbs. Of gasoline emissions to gallons of liquid gasoline. PMRgl = PMRgl = (PMRg)*(gal/6.25 lbs.) =Mass Removal Rate as Gasoline in Gallons/hour =0.00963 gal/hr Duration of Event (hrs)4 Total Gal Discharge AfvrEmis 0.039 Gallons 4-Dec-24 4TH EVENT-GROUP 1 FORMER UDOT 324, 324 WEST MAIN STREET, ESCALANTE, UTAH AIR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS Data Entry (Enter data into shaded cells only) Bwsw = lb. Water/lb. Dry air =0.0252 lb./lb. (from chart; humidity measured by probe) Bws = water vapor as % by volume = 0.0388 %(from guidelines) V = velocity in ft/min = 1831 fpm (from Manometer) V = velocity in ft/sec = 30.5 fps (from Manometer) d = diameter of discharge [in.] =3 in.(diameter of exhaust pipe) A = cross-sec. Area of discharge =0.0491 sq. ft. (Area of exhaust pipe) Ts = stack Temp. degrees R = 569 deg. R (from guidelines) Tf = stack Temp. deg. F =109 deg. F (from Temp. probe) PPMw = ppm measured = 251 ppm (from PID meter) 1. Calculate Flow as Dry Standard Cubic Feet Per Minute (DSCFM). Qstd = flow at DSCFM = 80.2 dscfm 2. Determine Pollutant mass Removal Rate as Gasoline (PMRg). PPMw = PPMm = obtained value from PID meter = "wet" concentration = 251 PPMd = (PPMw)/(1-Bws) = "dry concentration = 261 K = # carbons in calibration gas = Isobutylene = 4) = 4 PPMc = (PPMd)*(K) = PPMv, vol. Conc. Of VOCs as carbon, dry@STP =1045 Mc = 12.01 mg/mg-mol, mw of carbon =12.0 K3 = 24.07 dscm/1E6 mg-mg-mol, mass to vol. Conv. Factor @STP =24.1 Ccm = PPMc*(Mc/K3) = mg/dscm, mass conc. Of VOC as carbon = 521 Cc = Ccm*(62.43E-9 lb.-m3/mg-ft3) = lb./dscf, mass conc. Of VOCs as carbon, dry@STP =3.25E-05 PMRc = Cc*Qstd*60 min/hr) = lb./hr, poll. Mass rem. Rate of VOCs as carbon =0.157 Mg = 103 mg/mg-mol, mw of gasoline (value may vary depending on contaminant) =103 Mcg = 89 mg/mg-mol, weight of carbon in gasoline molecule =89 PMRg = PMRg = (PMRc)*(Mg/Mcg) = lb./hr, pollutant mass removal rate of VOCs as gasoline = 0.181 lb./hr 3. Convert lbs. Of gasoline emissions to gallons of liquid gasoline. PMRgl = PMRgl = (PMRg)*(gal/6.25 lbs.) =Mass Removal Rate as Gasoline in Gallons/hour =0.0290 gal/hr Duration of Event (hrs)4 Total Gal Discharge AfvrEmis 0.116 Gallons AIR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS FORMER UDOT 324, 324 WEST MAIN STREET, ESCALANTE, UTAH= 4TH EVENT-GROUP 2 4-Dec-24 Appendix C: Disposal Manifests NON•HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST Please prim or type. (Form designed for use on elite (12-p8ch) typewriter.) O 0 cc *-7 — : ,I I .., .. I SALT I ,. G E N E R A T 0 R NON-HAZARDOUS 1. Generators US EPA ID No. VSO Manifest Document No e....0 ,--+ 2. Page 1 1 WASTE MANIFEST cIl 3. Generator's Name and Wang Address UDOT 324 324 W Main Escalante Utah84106 4. Generators Phone ( ) 5. Transporter 1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number SUMP & TRAP CLEANING LLC I UTR000012286 A. Transporter 1 Phone 8015958151 7. Transporter 2 Company Name a. us EPA ID Number B. State Transporter's ID I C. Transporter 2 Phone 9. Designated FaOciity Name and Ste Address 10. US EPA ID Number SUMP & TRAP CLEANING LLC D. State Facilltys ID 618 SOUTH 4050 WEST LAKE CITY UTAH 84104 UTR000012286 I E. FacitiNs Pbcne 8015958151 1 1 . WASTE DESCRIPTION Containers No. Type 13. Total Quantity 14. UnIt Wt Nor. a. NON REGULATED WASTE WATER, PETROLEUM IMPACTED WASTE WATER 1 TT / 0 G b ' c. d. F. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above G. Handling Codes for Wastes Listed Above 15. Special Harding Instructions end Additional Information 7 ,r ...----7 ----7 I f er --- 1 —7 e i ,-, —7 r ... ._ 1 1.... ----, A 16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFiCATiON: I hereby certify Vial the contents of this shiperent ere fully and accurately described and are in all respects In proper COnCiftiOn for transport The materials described on this manifest are not subject to federal haPardous waste regulations I Date PiintecleType Name . 9—NAW ITI •Sb \k\t "2 " Signature Month *<. C _,98 Year 113 1" 1 R N S P 0R T R 17. Tranpsporter 1 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Materials Date riA p ntecirTyped Name • k If,. dy /11 111 - t 4 G —1 Signature Z i r'' 6 (-....e........ Month 1 ...._---- Day Year e J13 24 18. Transporter 2 Ar anleidTnent of Receipt of Materials Date printed/Typed Name Signature Month Day Year 1 1 F A C L I T 19. Discrepancy Indication Space 20. Facility Owner or Operator. Certification of receipt of the waste materials covered by this manliest except es noted in item 19. [ Date Printed/Typed Name A rdl D*.aY Year __....ca-,•-e---0•1 ":"---7 . _..----=.--,----- i - (/ F14 Pilled by Labelrrtaster, An American Labe1mark Co., Chicago. IL 60646 (BOO) 621.6808 01) .194,. COI 01,:rrtal to Po, R U.. WM.. 1.1114 soy roil( Rov. 1C093