The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDAQ-2025-0007351 DAQC-102-25 Site ID 10996 (B4) MEMORANDUM TO: STACK TEST FILE – W.W. CLYDE COMPANY – Portable Equipment Near Duchesne, Utah – Duchesne County THROUGH: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Oil and Gas Section Manager FROM: Kyle Greenberg, Environmental Scientist DATE: January 28, 2025 SUBJECT: Source: One (1) 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Location: Lat: 40.232647, Long: -110.337072 Contact: Kamren Garfield: 801-802-6933 Tester: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC Site ID #: 10996 Permit/AO #: DAQE-AN109960012-18, dated April 18, 2018 Subject: Review Stack Test Report dated October 18, 2024 On October 18, 2024, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a test report for the 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant in Duchesne County, Utah. Testing was performed August 27, 2024, to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits found in Conditions II.B.9.f and II.B.9.g of Approval Order DAQE-AN109960012-18 and 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart I. The DAQ-calculated test results are: Source Test Date Test Methods Pollutants Tester Results DAQ Results Limits 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant August 27, 2024 M5/202 PM 0.0074 gr/dscf 0.0074 gr/dscf 0.024 gr/dscf 9 VEO 0% NA 10% DEVIATIONS: None. CONCLUSION: The stack test appears to be acceptable. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the emissions from the 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Baghouse be considered to have been in compliance with the emission limits of the AO and 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart I, during the time of testing. HPV: None. ATTACHMENTS: W.W. Clyde Company’s Stack Test Report, DAQ excel worksheets 4 ' - ) - " Company W.W. Clyde Company Facility Portable Equipment Near Duchesne, Utah ; Site ID: 10996 County Duchesne County Unit ID 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Test Date 8/27/2024 EPA Methods 5 & 202: Determination of Particulate and Condensible Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources Run # 1 2 3 Average date 8/27/2024 8/27/2024 8/27/2024 start time 8:50 10:46 12:19 stop time 10:02 11:51 13:26 sampling time (minutes) 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 DS stack diameter (inches) 66.574 66.574 66.574 66.57 PAVG average (delta P)½ (" H2O)½0.5855 0.5848 0.5884 0.5862 CP pitot tube constant (unitless) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 TS stack temp. (°F) 212.0 216.0 218.0 215.3 Pbar barometric pressure (" Hg) 24.33 24.33 24.33 24.33 Ps stack pressure (" H2O)-0.35 -0.35 -0.35 -0.35 Yd meter box Yd (unitless)1.0330 1.0330 1.0330 1.033 Tm meter temp. (°F) 61.00 73.00 84.00 72.67 Vm sample volume (ft3)45.010 45.746 47.802 46.186 H orifice setting delta H (" H2O)1.45 1.55 4.63 2.5 Vlc moisture (g) 77.16 89.4 86.8 84.4 O2%vd oxygen (%vd) 13.0 13.0 12.8 12.9 CO2%vd carbon dioxide (%vd) 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1 DN nozzle diameter (inches) 0.2910 0.2910 0.2910 0.2910 Run # 1 2 3 Average grams mass particulate front half (g) 0.00320 0.00170 0.00200 0.00230 grams mass particulate filter (g) 0.00550 0.00560 0.00620 0.00577 grams mass inorganic fraction (g) 0.01020 0.01350 0.00460 0.00943 grams mass organic fraction (g) 0.00080 0.00060 0.00130 0.00090 Run # 1 2 3 Average Vmstd sample volume (dscf) 38.460 38.221 39.493 38.725 sample volume (dscm) 1.089 1.082 1.118 1.097 Vwstd moisture volume (dscf) 3.639 4.217 4.091 3.982 Bws measured moisture content (%/100) 0.086 0.099 0.094 0.093 saturated moisture content (%/100) 1.231 1.332 1.385 1.316 actual moisture content (%/100) 0.086 0.099 0.094 0.093 MD molecular weight (dry) 29.02 29.0000 29.01 29.01 MA molecular weight (actual) 28.07 27.91 27.98 27.98 VS gas velocity (ft/sec) 41.7 41.9 42.2 41.9 FACFM gas flow (acfm) 60,516 60,793 61,183 60,831 FDSCFM gas flow (dscfm) 35,301 34,754 35,087 35,048 lb/hr gas flow (lb/hr) 168,744 167,573 168,560 168,292 % % isokinetic 91.3 92.2 94.3 92.6 Permit Limits lb/hr F½ PM (lb/hr) 1.0565 0.8782 0.9638 0.9662 gr/dscf F½ PM (gr/dscf) 0.0035 0.0029 0.0032 0.0032 lb/hr inorganic CPM emissions (lb/hr) 1.2386 1.6241 0.5407 1.1345 gr/dscf inorganic CPM emissions (gr/dscf) 0.0041 0.0055 0.0018 0.0038 lb/hr organic CPM emissions (lb/hr) 0.0971 0.0722 0.1528 0.1074 gr/dscf organic CPM emissions (gr/dscf) 0.0003 0.0002 0.0005 0.0004 lb/hr total CPM emissions (lb/hr) 1.3358 1.6963 0.6935 1.2418 gr/dscf total CPM emissions (gr/dscf) 0.0044 0.0057 0.0023 0.0041 lb/hr Total PM (lb/hr) 2.3922 2.5745 1.6573 2.2080 gr/dscf Total PM (gr/dscf) 0.0079 0.0086 0.0055 0.0074 0.024 Field Reference Method Data Laboratory Data Reference Method Calculations Company W.W. Clyde Company Facility Portable Equipment Near Duchesne, Utah ; Site ID: 10996CountyDuchesne County Unit ID 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Test Date 8/27/2024 Run 1 - Intermediate Isokinetic values Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F% 82.811 Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics 1 2.5 84.56 0.3 0.5477 1.24 215 56 57 95.84 2 2.5 86.191 0.26 0.5099 1.07 219 57 59 95.9632.5 87.911 0.3 0.5477 1.24 62.5 57 59 94.25 4 2.5 89.741 0.34 0.5831 1.4 219 58 59 94.1552.5 91.66 0.37 0.6083 1.52 219 57 59 94.77 6 2.5 93.391 0.33 0.5745 1.36 219 57 60 90.39 7 2.5 95.271 0.35 0.5916 1.45 216 58 60 95.0482.5 97.061 0.32 0.5657 1.33 214 58 61 94.38 9 2.5 98.791 0.3 0.5477 1.25 213 58 61 94.11102.5 100.589 0.32 0.5657 1.34 212 58 62 94.57 11 2.5 102.391 0.32 0.5657 1.34 211 59 62 94.62 12 2.5 104.341 0.36 0.6000 1.51 210 59 62 96.51132.5 106.291 0.36 0.6000 1.51 210 59 63 96.42 14 2.5 108.191 0.34 0.5831 1.43 210 60 64 96.46152.5 110.141 0.36 0.6000 1.51 210 60 64 96.23 16 2.5 112.181 0.41 0.6403 1.73 210 60 65 94.31 17 2.5 114.311 0.45 0.6708 1.9 209 61 66 93.79182.5 116.411 0.43 0.6557 1.82 209 61 66 94.57 19 2.5 118.161 0.27 0.5196 1.14 210 62 67 99.14202.5 119.801 0.25 0.5000 1.06 209 62 68 96.36 21 2.5 121.861 0.43 0.6557 1.82 209 62 68 92.50 22 2.5 124.001 0.44 0.6633 1.87 209 63 68 94.92232.5 126.001 0.38 0.6164 1.61 209 63 69 95.29 24 2.5 127.821 0.29 0.5385 1.23 209 64 70 98.96 25 2.5 129.499 0.25 0.5000 1.06 209 64 70 98.22 Run 2 - Intermediate Isokinetic values Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F%129.714 Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics 1 2.5 131.48 0.31 0.5568 1.4 209 67 69 93.82 2 2.5 133.17 0.28 0.5292 1.24 221 67 69 95.27 3 2.5 135.01 0.32 0.5657 1.42 220 67 69 97.0042.5 136.86 0.33 0.5745 1.47 218 67 70 95.82 5 2.5 138.87 0.39 0.6245 1.74 218 68 70 95.76 6 2.5 140.74 0.33 0.5745 1.48 217 68 71 96.61 7 2.5 142.65 0.35 0.5916 1.57 216 68 72 95.68 8 2.5 144.56 0.34 0.5831 1.53 216 68 73 96.9792.5 146.34 0.29 0.5385 1.3 215 69 73 97.62 10 2.5 148.17 0.32 0.5657 1.44 215 69 74 95.49 11 2.5 150.03 0.32 0.5657 1.44 215 69 75 96.97 12 2.5 151.91 0.34 0.5831 1.53 215 69 75 95.11 13 2.5 153.92 0.38 0.6164 1.72 215 70 76 96.06142.5 155.77 0.31 0.5568 1.4 215 71 77 97.61 15 2.5 157.68 0.35 0.5916 1.58 215 71 77 94.90 16 2.5 159.71 0.39 0.6245 1.77 216 72 78 95.49 17 2.5 161.84 0.43 0.6557 1.95 216 72 78 95.47 18 2.5 164.02 0.44 0.6633 2 215 73 79 96.36192.5 165.82 0.29 0.5385 1.32 215 73 80 97.71 20 2.5 167.42 0.24 0.4899 1.09 215 74 80 95.32 21 2.5 169.46 0.41 0.6403 1.87 215 74 80 93.20 22 2.5 171.61 0.42 0.6481 1.91 215 74 81 96.97 23 2.5 173.61 0.36 0.6000 1.64 214 75 82 97.10242.5 175.46 0.31 0.5568 1.42 215 76 82 96.71 25 2.5 177.223 0.27 0.5196 1.23 214 76 82 98.62 Run 3 - Intermediate Isokinetic values Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack Meter Temp ⁰F% 177.458 Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics 1 2.5 179.31 0.32 0.5657 1.49 215 79 80 94.76 2 2.5 181.16 0.3 0.5477 1.4 216 79 81 97.7232.5 183.01 0.3 0.5477 1.4 216 79 81 97.72 4 2.5 184.99 0.35 0.5916 1.63 217 79 82 96.87 5 2.5 187 0.4 0.6325 1.86 217 79 82 92.05 6 2.5 189.11 0.35 0.5916 1.63 218 80 83 103.12 7 2.5 191.11 0.35 0.5916 1.63 218 79 83 97.8382.5 193.13 0.36 0.6000 1.68 218 80 84 97.27 9 2.5 195.01 0.31 0.5568 1.45 218 80 85 97.39 10 2.5 196.86 0.3 0.5477 1.4 218 80 86 97.32 11 2.5 198.73 0.31 0.5568 1.45 219 81 86 96.77 12 2.5 200.71 0.35 0.5916 1.63 219 81 87 96.39132.5 202.85 0.4 0.6325 1.87 219 82 87 97.43 14 2.5 204.79 0.33 0.5745 1.55 218 82 88 96.99 15 2.5 206.86 0.37 0.6083 1.74 218 83 89 97.61 16 2.5 208.94 0.36 0.6000 1.69 218 83 89 99.42 17 2.5 211.13 0.41 0.6403 1.93 218 84 90 97.98182.5 213.37 0.44 0.6633 2.07 218 84 90 96.78 19 2.5 215.27 0.3 0.5477 1.41 218 84 91 99.13 20 2.5 217.01 0.26 0.5099 1.22 218 85 91 97.37 21 2.5 219.11 0.39 0.6245 1.84 218 86 91 96.05 22 2.5 221.27 0.4 0.6325 1.89 218 86 92 97.47232.5 223.26 0.34 0.5831 1.6 219 86 92 97.39 24 2.5 225.26 0.34 0.5831 1.61 218 87 93 97.63 25 2.5 227.128 0.29 0.5385 1.37 218 87 93 98.67 Source Test Report for 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Testing Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant (HMAP) PM and VEs W. W. Clyde & Company Near Duchesne, Utah Prepared For: W. W. Clyde & Company 730 North 1500 West Orem, Utah 84057 Prepared By: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 For Submission To: Utah Dept. of Environmental Quality 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820 Document Number: GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Test Date: August 27, 2024 Submittal Date: October 18, 2024 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Review and Certification All work, calculations, and other activities and tasks performed and presented in this document were carried out by me or under my direction and supervision. I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, Montrose operated in conformance with the requirements of the Montrose Quality Management System and ASTM D7036-04 during this test project. Signature: Austin Tramell Date:October 11, 2024 Name: Austin Tramell Title: Field Project Manager I have reviewed, technically and editorially, details and other appropriate written materials contained herein. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the presented material is authentic and accurate and conforms to the requirements of the Montrose Quality Management System and ASTM D7036-04. Signature: Date: October 11, 2024 Name: Beckie Hawkins Title: District Manager Facility Certification I have reviewed this document and agree that the information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete, to the best of my knowledge. Signature: Date: October 11, 2024 Name: Kamren Garfield Title: Environmental Specialist 2 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Summary of Test Program ........................................................................... 5 1.2 Key Personnel ............................................................................................ 7 2.0 Plant and Sampling Location Descriptions .............................................................. 8 2.1 Process Description, Operation, and Control Equipment ................................... 8 2.2 Stack Gas Sampling Location ....................................................................... 8 2.3 Operating Conditions and Process Data .......................................................... 9 3.0 Sampling and Analytical Procedures ..................................................................... 10 3.1 Test Methods ............................................................................................ 10 3.1.1 EPA Method 1, Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Source ........ 10 3.1.2 EPA Method 2, Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S Pitot Tube) .................................................................... 10 3.1.3 EPA Method 3, Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight 11 3.1.4 EPA Method 4, Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gas ............... 11 3.1.5 EPA Methods 5 and 202, Determination of Particulate Matter from Stationary Sources and Dry Impinger Method for Determining Condensable Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources ...................................... 12 3.1.6 EPA Method 9, Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions .............. 14 3.2 Process Test Methods ................................................................................. 14 4.0 Test Discussion and Results ................................................................................ 15 4.1 Field Test Deviations and Exceptions ............................................................ 15 4.2 Presentation of Results ............................................................................... 15 5.0 Internal QA/QC Activities ................................................................................... 17 5.1 QA/QC Audits ........................................................................................... 17 5.2 QA/QC Discussion ...................................................................................... 17 5.3 Quality Statement ..................................................................................... 17 3 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report List of Appendices A Field Data and Calculations ................................................................................ 18 A.1 Sampling Location ..................................................................................... 19 A.2 Emissions Test Results ............................................................................... 20 A.3 Field Data ................................................................................................ 21 A.4 Example Calculations ................................................................................. 53 B Facility Process Data ......................................................................................... 57 C Laboratory Data ............................................................................................... 59 D Quality Assurance/Quality Control ....................................................................... 65 D.1 Units and Abbreviations .............................................................................. 66 D.2 Calibration Records .................................................................................... 74 D.3 Accreditation Information/Certifications ........................................................ 86 List of Tables Table 1-1 Summary of Test Program .......................................................................... 5 Table 1-2 Summary of Average Compliance Results, Dillman 500 TPH HMAP ................... 6 Table 1-3 Test Personnel and Responsibilities .............................................................. 7 Table 2-1 Sampling Location ..................................................................................... 8 Table 4-1 Emissions Results, Dillman 500 TPH HMAP, Near Duchesne, Utah .................... 16 List of Figures Figure 3-1 EPA Method 5/202 Sampling Train .............................................................. 13 4 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Summary of Test Program W. W. Clyde & Company contracted Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC (Montrose) to perform a compliance emissions test program on the following units at the facility located near Duchesne, UT: Dillman 500 TPH portable counter-flow hot mix asphalt plant (HMAP). The Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), Air Quality Division issued W. W. Clyde & Company Approval Order (AO) No. DAQE-AN109960012-18 for the Dillman 500 TPH portable counter-flow HMAP on April 18, 2018 . Both the AO and EPA 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart I require testing for particulate matter (PM) concentrations and mass emissions as well as the visual determination of the opacity of emissions. The specific objectives were to:  Conduct Emissions Compliance Tests for PM/PM10 (gr/dscf, lb/hr, lb/ton HMA production) and the Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions (%).  Conduct the test program with a focus on safety. Montrose performed the tests to measure the emission parameters listed in Table 1-1. Table 1-1 Summary of Test Program Test Date Unit ID/ Source Name Activity/Parameters Test Methods No. of Runs Duration (Minutes) 8/27/2024 Dillman 500 TPH portable counter-flow HMAP Traverse Points EPA M1 -- -- Stack Gas Velocity, Volumetric Flow Rate EPA M2 3 60 O₂, CO2 EPA M3 3 60 H₂O EPA M4 3 60 PM10 EPA M5/202 3 60 Opacity EPA M9 3 6 To simplify this report, a list of Units and Abbreviations is included in Appendix D.1. Throughout this report, chemical nomenclature, acronyms, and reporting units are not defined. Please refer to the list for specific details. This report presents the test results and supporting data, descriptions of the testing procedures, descriptions of the facility and sampling locations, and a summary of the quality assurance procedures used by Montrose. The average emission test results are summarized and compared to their respective permit limits in Table 1-2. Detailed results for individual test runs can be found in Section 4.0. All supporting data can be found in the appendices. 5 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report The testing was conducted by the Montrose personnel listed in Table 1-3. The tests were conducted according to the test plan (protocol) dated July 26, 2024 that was submitted to and approved by the UDEQ. Table 1-2 Summary of Average Compliance Results, Dillman 500 TPH HMAP Parameter/Units Average Results Emission Limits1 Filterable PM lb/hr 0.97 gr/dscf 0.0032 0.03 lb/ton HMA production Total PM (PM/PM10/PM2.5) lb/hr 2.2 gr/dscf 0.0074 0.024 lb/ton HMA production 0.0064 Opacity of Visible Emissions % 0.0 10 1 UDEQ AO DAQE-AN109960012-18, §II.B.9.g. lists the particulate matter emissions limits; §II.B.9.f. lists the opacity of visible emissions limit. 6 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report 1.2 Key Personnel A list of project participants is included below: Facility Information Source Location: W. W. Clyde & Company Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMAP Near Duchesne, UT Project Contact: Kamren Garfield Role: Environmental Specialist Company: W. W. Clyde & Company Telephone: (801) 802-6933 Email: kgarfield@clydeinc.com Agency Information Regulatory Agency: Utah Department of Environmental Quality Agency Contact: Chad Gilgen Telephone: (385) 306-6500 Email: cgilgen@utah.gov Testing Company Information Testing Firm: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC Contact: Beckie Hawkins Austin Tramell Title: District Manager Field Technician Telephone: 801-794-2950 801-794-2950 Email: BeHawkins@montrose-env.com AuTramell@montrose-env.com Test personnel and observers are summarized in Table 1-3. Table 1-3 Test Personnel and Responsibilities Name Affiliation Role/Responsibility Austin Tramell Montrose Field Team Leader/Sample recovery/ Certified visual opacity of emissions observer Joe Avila Montrose Field Technician/Sample recovery/Sample train operator Joby Dunmire Montrose Calculations and report preparation Kamren Garfield W. W. Clyde & Company Test coordination 7 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report 2.0 Plant and Sampling Location Descriptions 2.1 Process Description, Operation, and Control Equipment Asphaltic concrete paving is a mixture of well graded, high quality aggregate and liquid asphaltic cement which is heated and mixed in measured quantities to produce bituminous pavement material. Aggregate constitutes 92 weight percent of the total mixture. Aside from the amount and grade of asphalt used, mix characteristics are determined by the relative amounts and types of aggregate used. A certain percentage of fine aggregate (% less that 74 micrometers in physical diameter) is required for the production of good quality asphaltic concrete. The counter-flow drum mix process simplifies the conventional process by proportioning feed controls in place of hot aggregate storage bins, vibrating screens, and the mixer. Aggregate is introduced at the end of the revolving drum mixer and the asphalt is injected midway along the drum. A variable flow asphalt pump is linked electronically to the aggregate belt scales to control mix specifications. The hot mix is discharged from the revolving drum mixer into surge bins or storage bins. Emissions from the HMAP is controlled with a baghouse with an operating range of 2” H2O to 7” H2O differential pressure. 2.2 Stack Gas Sampling Location Information regarding the sampling location is presented in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 Sampling Location Sampling Location Stack Inside Dimensions LXW (in.) / Equivalent Diameter (in.) Distance from Nearest Disturbance Number of Traverse Points Downstream EPA “B” (in./dia.) Upstream EPA “A” (in./dia.) Dillman 500 TPH portable counter-flow HMAP 59.0X59.0 / 59.0 ~195.5 / ~3.3 ~38.5 / ~0.65 Isokinetic: 25 (5/port) The sample location was verified in the field to conform to EPA Method 1. Acceptable cyclonic flow conditions were confirmed prior to testing using EPA Method 1, Section 11.4. See Appendix A.1 for more information. 8 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report 2.3 Operating Conditions and Process Data Emission tests are performed while the source/units and air pollution control devices are operating at the conditions required by the permit. Plant personnel are responsible for establishing the test conditions and collecting all applicable unit-operating data. Data collected includes the following parameters:  Asphalt production rate, in tons per hour, at least once every 15 minutes.  The recycled asphalt product (RAP) feed rate, in tons per hour, at least once every 15 minutes.  Hot mix temperature, measured in degree Fahrenheit (°F), at least once every 15 minutes.  The applicable emissions control device operating parameters at least once every 15 minutes, including, at a minimum, baghouse pressure drop, typically measured in inches of water (“ H2O). 9 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report 3.0 Sampling and Analytical Procedures 3.1 Test Methods The test methods for this test program have been presented in Table 1-1. Additional information regarding specific applications or modifications to standard procedures is presented below. 3.1.1 EPA Method 1, Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Source EPA Method 1 is used to assure that representative measurements of volumetric flow rate are obtained by dividing the cross-section of the stack or duct into equal areas, and then locating a traverse point within each of the equal areas. Acceptable sample locations must be located at least two stack or duct equivalent diameters downstream from a flow disturbance and one-half equivalent diameter upstream from a flow disturbance. 3.1.2 EPA Method 2, Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S Pitot Tube) EPA Method 2 is used to measure the gas velocity using an S-type pitot tube connected to a pressure measurement device, and to measure the gas temperature using a calibrated thermocouple connected to a thermocouple indicator. Typically, Type S (Stausscheibe) pitot tubes conforming to the geometric specifications in the test method are used, along with an inclined manometer. The measurements are made at traverse points specified by EPA Method 1. The molecular weight of the gas stream is determined from independent measurements of O₂, CO₂, and moisture. The stack gas volumetric flow rate is calculated using the measured average velocity head, the area of the duct at the measurement plane, the measured average temperature, the measured duct static pressure, the molecular weight of the gas stream, and the measured moisture. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below: o S-type pitot tube coefficient is 0.84. The typical sampling system is detailed as part of the EPA Methods 5/202 sampling train in Figure 3-1. 10 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report 3.1.3 EPA Method 3, Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight EPA Method 3 is used to calculate the dry molecular weight of the stack gas by measuring the percent O2 and CO2 in the gas stream. A gas sample is extracted from the stack by one of the following methods: (1) single-point, grab sampling; (2) single-point, integrated sampling; or (3) multi-point, integrated sampling. The gas sample is analyzed for percent CO2 and percent O2 using an Orsat analyzer. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below:  Method Options: o An Orsat analyzer is used to measure the analyte concentrations. o Single-point integrated sampling is performed. o Less than 28 L (1.0 ft3) is collected.  Target and/or Minimum Required Sample Duration: 60 minutes  Target and/or Minimum Recommended Sample Volume: 1.0 ft3  Target Analytes: O2 and CO2 3.1.4 EPA Method 4, Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gas EPA Method 4 is a manual, non-isokinetic method used to measure the moisture content of gas streams. Gas is sampled at a constant sampling rate through a probe and impinger train. Moisture is removed using a series of pre-weighed impingers containing methodology- specific liquids and silica gel immersed in an ice water bath. The impingers are weighed after each run to determine the percent moisture. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below: o Condensed water is measured gravimetrically. o Moisture sampling is performed as part of the pollutant (Methods 5 and 202) sample trains. o Since it is theoretically impossible for measured moisture to be higher than psychrometric moisture, the psychrometric moisture is also calculated, and the lower moisture value is used in the calculations. o Minimum Required Sample Volume: 21 scf As the EPA Methods 5 and 202 sampling train were used to collect moisture, sampling was not constant; rather, sampling was isokinetic as per the criteria set forth in EPA Methods 5 and 202. The typical sampling system is detailed as part of the EPA Methods 5/202 sampling train in Figure 3-1. 11 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report 3.1.5 EPA Methods 5 and 202, Determination of Particulate Matter from Stationary Sources and Dry Impinger Method for Determining Condensable Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources EPA Methods 5 and 202 are manual, isokinetic methods used to measure FPM and CPM emissions. The methods are performed in conjunction with EPA Methods 1 through 4. A glass probe liner was used and maintained at a temperature of 248 ± 25°F for the duration of the test program. The particulate filter holder was also kept at a temperature of 248 ± 25°F. The back-half condensable part of the train consisted of a condenser and water dropout followed by an empty impinger. After the empty impinger, a Teflon filter (CPM Filter) was placed prior to an impinger containing a 100 mls of water and the last impinger contained a known amount of silica gel. All impingers and the water dropout were weighed before and after each test to determine the moisture content of the gases. The condensor, knockout, empty impinger and CPM Filter were purged with nitrogen for one (1) hour at fourteen (14) liters per minute following each run. After the nitrogen purge, each of those components, along with the back of the heated filter housing and the front half of the CPM filter were rinsed twice with water and the contents placed in a sample container labeled water rinse. Following the water rinse, each of the components were then rinsed once with acetone and then twice with hexane and the contents were placed in sample container labeled organic rinse. The water rinse and the organic rinse were evaporated and weighed and included to the total particulate catch. The CPM filter was also weighed to dryness before and after each run, and the weight was included in the total wash. The CPM filter was maintained at a temperature between 65°F and 85°F during each sample run. A binderless glass fiber filter was employed as the capture media for the particulate emissions. The probe, nozzle and pre-filter glassware was washed with AR grade acetone. The acetone was then evaporated and weighed. The acetone catch was added to the filter weight and used in the emissions calculation for particulate determinations. The acetone catch, filter weight and the back-half condensables were used to calculate PM10 emissions. The FPM, CPM, and total (TPM) results are reported in emission concentration and emission rate units. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below:  The cross-over piece located between the filter and the probe was modified to receive a thermocouple to measure the temperature of the gases leaving the probe.  Condensed water is measured gravimetrically.  Target Sample Duration: 60 minutes.  Minimum Required Sample Volume: 31.8 dscf.  Alt-009 was used for the post-test dry gas meter calibration. 12 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report The typical sampling system is detailed in Figure 3-1. Figure 3-1 EPA Method 5/202 Sampling Train MANOMETER FILTER HOLDER FILTER HOLDERTHERMOCOUPLE Empty (modified / no tip) Empty (modified / no tip) WATER BATH WATERIN 200-300gSilica Gel (modified / no tip) VACUUM LINE ADAPTOR VACUUM LINE ICE BATH 100 ml H2O(modified / no tip) MANOMETER BY-PASS VALVE (fine adjust) AIR TIGHT PUMP VACUUM GAUGE MAIN VALVE (coarse adjust) THERMOCOUPLES DRY GAS METER ORIFICE GAS EXIT WATEROUT TYPE “S” PITOT CONDENSER THERMOCOUPLE THERMOCOUPLES THERMOCOUPLE HEATED PROBE NOZZLE HEATED AREA THERMOCOUPLE 13 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report 3.1.6 EPA Method 9, Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions EPA Method 9 is used to observe the visual opacity of emissions (opacity). The observer stands at a distance sufficient to provide a clear view of the emissions with the sun oriented in the 140° sector to their back. The line of vision is perpendicular to the plume direction and does not include more than one plume diameter. Observations are recorded at 15- second intervals and are made to the nearest 5% opacity. The qualified observer is certified according to the requirements of EPA Method 9, section 3.1. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below:  Observations were conducted during each particulate run.  Total Observation Period Duration: 6 minutes per run 3.2 Process Test Methods The applicable regulations do not require process samples to be collected during this test program. 14 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report 4.0 Test Discussion and Results 4.1 Field Test Deviations and Exceptions No field deviations or exceptions from the test plan or test methods were reported by the test crew during this test program. 4.2 Presentation of Results The average results are compared to the permit limits in Table 1-2. The results of individual compliance test runs performed are presented in Table 4-1. Emissions are reported in units consistent with those in the applicable regulations or requirements. Additional information is included in the appendices as presented in the Table of Contents. 15 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Table 4-1 Emissions Results, Dillman 500 TPH HMAP, Near Duchesne, Utah Parameter/Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Date 8/27/2024 8/27/2024 8/27/2024 Time 08:50-10:02 10:46-11:51 12:19-13:26 Process Data Aggregate HMA Production Rate (tph) 345.7 345.7 346.3 345.9 RAP Production Rate (tph) 53.3 48.2 53.8 51.8 Hot Mix Temperature (°F) 333 331 337 334 Baghouse Pressure Drop (“ H2O) 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 Sampling & Flue Gas Parameters O2, % volume dry 13.0 13.0 12.8 12.9 CO2, % volume dry 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1 H2O, % volume 8.6 9.9 9.5 9.3 Volume dry gas sampled, dscf 38.4 38.2 39.1 38.6 Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate, dscfm 35,284 34,762 35,064 35,036 Isokinetic Ratio, % 91.3 92.1 93.4 92.3 Filterable PM (FPM) gr/dscf 0.0035 0.0029 0.0032 0.0032 lb/hr 1.1 0.88 0.97 0.97 lb/ton HMA production 0.0031 0.0025 0.0028 0.0028 Condensable PM (CPM) gr/dscf 0.0044 0.0057 0.0023 0.0041 lb/hr 1.3 1.7 0.70 1.2 lb/ton HMA production 0.0039 0.0049 0.0020 0.0036 Total PM/PM10 (TPM) gr/dscf 0.0079 0.0086 0.0056 0.0074 lb/hr 2.4 2.6 1.7 2.2 lb/ton HMA production 0.0069 0.0074 0.0048 0.0064 Opacity of Emissions Results Maximum opacity, % 0 0 0 0 Minimum opacity, % 0 0 0 0 Average opacity, % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, UT 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report 5.0 Internal QA/QC Activities 5.1 QA/QC Audits The meter box and sampling trains used during sampling performed within the requirements of their respective methods. All post-test leak checks, minimum metered volumes, minimum sample durations, and percent isokinetics met the applicable QA/QC criteria. EPA Method 9 was performed by a certified Visible Emissions Evaluator. For quality assurance, the observer obtained a view of the emissions with the best available contrasting background and with the sun oriented in the 140° sector to their back. Readings were taken every 15 seconds and made to the nearest 5% opacity. EPA Method 5 analytical QA/QC results are included in the laboratory report. The method QA/QC criteria were met. An EPA Method 5 reagent blank was analyzed. The maximum allowable amount that can be subtracted is 0.001% of the weight of the acetone used. The blank did not exceed the maximum residue allowed. Blank correction was performed for the individual test results. EPA Method 202 analytical QA/QC results are included in the laboratory report. The method QA/QC criteria were met. In addition to the EPA Method 202 Field Recovery Reagent Blanks being collected and analyzed, all glassware was washed and baked prior to this series of source testing as an added QA/QC step. The maximum allowable amount that can be subtracted from the Field Recovery Water Blank and Field Recovery Acetone/Hexane Blank is 0.002 g (2.0 mg). Blanks did not exceed the maximum residue allowed. Blank correction was performed for the individual test results. Laboratory QA/QC results are provided in Appendix C. 5.2 QA/QC Discussion All QA/QC criteria were met during this test program. 5.3 Quality Statement Montrose is qualified to conduct this test program and has established a quality management system that led to accreditation with ASTM Standard D7036-04 (Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies). Montrose participates in annual functional assessments for conformance with D7036-04 which are conducted by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA). All testing performed by Montrose is supervised on site by at least one Qualified Individual (QI) as defined in D7036-04 Section 8.3.2. Data quality objectives for estimating measurement uncertainty within the documented limits in the test methods are met by using approved test protocols for each project as defined in D7036-04 Sections 7.2.1 and 12.10. Additional quality assurance information is included in the report appendices. The content of this report is modeled after the EPA Emission Measurement Center Guideline Document (GD-043). 17 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, NV 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Appendix A Field Data and Calculations 18 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, NV 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Appendix A.1 Sampling Location 19 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Client:Job No. : City / State:Date : Source:Input By: 59.00 24.174 Particulate 2 59 25 59 5 x 5 Port Type: Port Diameter 4 5 Inches Duct Diameters 5 38.5 0.65 5 x 5 195.5 3.31 5 59.0 INCHES Point No. 59.0 1 5.90 7.90 INCHES 2 17.70 19.70 3 29.50 31.50 4 41.30 43.30 5 53.10 55.10 * Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch * Adjusted points diameter < 24" no point closer than 0.5 inch Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 9 ; if the 8 / 2 diameters downstream and upstream criteria is met. Diameter; Inches Downstream From Flow Disturbance (B): Inside Stack 195.5 INCHES 38.5 INCHES Diameter; Inches Outside Nipple Number of Points per port: Matrix Used (Ports x Points): Type of Traverse: Velocity or Particulate Length (Side with ports): Width (Depth of port): Total Number of Traverse Points: Required Minimum Matrix: Ports Available: Stack Drawing & Traverse Point Location Stack Properties: Upstream From Flow Disturbance (A): Length of Port, inches: Number of Points per port: Duchesne, UT Austin Tramell Stack Area, Ft2:Equivalent Diameter, inches: Dillman HMAP Dillman HMAP WW Clyde PROJ-044254 8/27/2024 20 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, NV 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Appendix A.2 Emissions Test Results 21 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC. 6823 South 3600 West 801-794-2950 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 TABLE 4.1.4 (CALCULATED COMPLIANCE CRITERIA) Plant:W. W. CLYDE Source:DILLMAN 500 Method:EPA 5/202 Date:8/27/2024 Symbol Description Units Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 Average: Vm std Volume Dry gas dscf/min 0.615 0.612 0.626 0.618 Sampled @ Standard dscf 38.438 38.234 39.120 38.597 conditions Vw gas Volume of Water Vapor scf 3.632 4.209 4.083 3.975 Collected @ Standard Conditions Across Orifice Meter Bws, sat Proportion by Volume of 1.242 1.324 1.380 1.315 Saturated Water Vapor in Gas Stream Bws, act Proportion by Volume of 0.086 0.099 0.095 0.093 Measured Water Vapor in Gas Stream Md Dry Molecular Weight lb/lb mole 29.02 29.00 29.01 29.01 Ms Wet Molecular Weight lb/lb mole 28.06 27.91 27.97 27.98 Vs Stack Gas Velocity ft/sec 41.7 41.9 42.2 41.9 Qsd Volumetric Flow Rate dscf/h 2,117,032 2,085,699 2,103,824 2,102,185 Dry Basis @ Standard dscf/min 35,284 34,762 35,064 35,036 Conditions ISO Isokinetic Variation %91.3 92.1 93.4 92.3 HMA HMA Production Rate tph 345.72 345.72 346.25 345.90 EmRFPM FPM Emission Rates g/dscm 8.1E-03 6.8E-03 7.5E-03 7.5E-03 lbs/dscf 5.0E-07 4.2E-07 4.6E-07 4.6E-07 gr/dscf 3.5E-03 2.9E-03 3.2E-03 3.2E-03 lbs/hr 1.06 0.88 0.97 0.97 lbs/ton HMA production 3.1E-03 2.5E-03 2.8E-03 2.8E-03 EmRCPM CPM Emission Rates g/dscm 1.0E-02 1.3E-02 5.4E-03 9.6E-03 lbs/dscf 6.3E-07 8.1E-07 3.3E-07 5.9E-07 gr/dscf 4.4E-03 5.7E-03 2.3E-03 4.1E-03 lbs/hr 1.34 1.70 0.70 1.24 lbs/ton HMA production 3.9E-03 4.9E-03 2.0E-03 3.6E-03 EmRTPM TPM Emission Rates g/dscm 1.8E-02 2.0E-02 1.3E-02 1.7E-02 lbs/dscf 1.1E-06 1.2E-06 7.9E-07 1.1E-06 gr/dscf 7.9E-03 8.6E-03 5.6E-03 7.4E-03 lbs/hr 2.39 2.57 1.67 2.21 lbs/ton HMA production 6.9E-03 7.4E-03 4.8E-03 6.4E-03 22 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC. 6823 South 3600 West 801-794-2950 Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 TABLE 4.1.3 (FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA SUMMARY) Plant:W. W. CLYDE Source:DILLMAN 500 Method:EPA 5/202 Date:8/27/2024 Symbol Description Units Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 Average: Vm Volume Dry Gas dcf 45.010 45.746 47.802 46.186 Sampled @ Meter Iso 46.495 47.256 49.379 47.710 Conditions Pbar Barometric Pressure "Hg 24.33 24.33 24.33 24.33 DH Average Pressure "H2O 1.45 1.55 1.63 1.54 Drop Across the Orifice Meter tm Ave.Gas Meter Temp. °F 61 73 84 73 Tm Ave.Gas Meter Temp. °R 521 533 544 533 Y Meter Coefficient dimensionless 1.033 1.033 1.033 1.033 Vw Total H2O Collected,g 77.16 89.41 86.75 84.44 Impingers & Silica Gel CO2 Orsat Analysis %3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1 O2 Orsat Analysis %13.0 13.0 12.8 12.9 N2 + CO Orsat Analysis %83.9 84.0 84.1 84.0 Dn Nozzle Diameter inches 0.291 0.291 0.291 0.291 Ts Stack Temperature °F 212 216 218 215 ts Stack Temperature °R 672 676 678 675 Sqrt DP Velocity Head of "H2O 0.5855 0.5848 0.5884 0.5862 Stack Gas Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient dimensionless 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Pg Static Pressure "H2O -0.35 -0.35 -0.35 -0.35 Ps Absolute Pressure "Hg 24.30 24.30 24.30 24.30 As Stack Area Ft2 24.17 24.17 24.17 24.17 f Stack diameter inches 66.57 66.57 66.57 66.57 Tt Net Time of Test minute 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Mn, FPM FPM Sample Collected mg 8.7 7.3 8.2 8.1 Mn, CPM CPM Sample Collected mg 11.0 14.1 5.9 10.3 Mn, TPM Total Sample Collected mg 19.7 21.4 14.1 18.4 23 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, NV 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Appendix A.3 Field Data 24 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 25 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC. 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 801-794-2950 1 Plant W. W. CLYDE 2 City Duchesne, Utah 3 Stack Name DILLMAN 500 4 Operator Austin Tramell 5 Date 8/27/2024 6 Reference Method EPA 5/202 7 Run #1 Compliance 8 Stack Diameter - f 66.57 inches 9 Stack Area - As 24.174 square feet 10 Sample Box Number es 11 Meter Box Number c-5000 12 Meter ^H@ 1.641 1 13 Meter Calibration - Y 1.033 14 Pitot Tube - Cp 0.84 15 Probe Length 5' B feet 16 Probe Liner Material Glass 17 Probe Heater Setting 248 °F 18 Ambient Temperature 56 °F 19 Barometric Pressure - Pbar 24.33 inches Hg 20 Stack Gas Pressure - Ps 24.30 inches Hg 21 Assumed Moisture 15 % 22 Static Pressure - Pg -0.35 inches H20 23 C Factor 0 24 Reference DP 0.35 inches H20 25 Nozzle Identification Number a 26 Nozzle Diameter - Dn 0.291 inches 27 Cross-sectional area of nozzle - An 4.62E-04 square feet 28 Thermometer Number #1-A 29 Pretest Leak Rate 0.000 cfm 30 Leak Check Vacuum 15 inches H2O 31 Filter Number 5 32 Initial leak Check Pitot Tubes Finish 82.734 A= OK Start 82.734 B= OK Rate 0 Vac = 15 PARTICULATE FIELD DATA Run #1 Page 1 of 18 26 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 PRETEST CALCULATIONS NOZZLE DIAMETER ISOKINETIC ^H Dn = 0.291 ^H = 0.87 constant 0.0357 Cp 0.84 constant 849.80 Qm 0.75 Imp V(H2O)(ml)67.50 ^H@ 1.00 P bar(in HG) 24.33 Gel H2O(g) 12.00 Md 29.02 Pg(in H2O) -0.35 V(H2O)(ml) 127.80 Mm 29.02 Ps 24.30 Vm(acf) 49.23 K 2.51 Cp 0.84 ^h avg 0.20 ^P 0.35 Tm(°F)55 Vwc 6.02 ^H = 0.87 Tm(°R)515 Vmc 42.41 Bwm 0 Bws = 0.12 Bws 0.15 Ts(°F)215 Ts(°R)675 Md 29.0160 Ms 27.3636 Pb(in HG) 24.33 Pg(in H2O) -0.35 Ps 24.30 (^P)avg 0.3450 Dn =0.266 Pm 24.44 PRETEST DATA Run #1 Page 2 of 18 27 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas Velocity Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume Head Outlet Inlet ts Vm difference DP (°F)(°F)(°F)(ft3)(ft3)(in H2O) starting 82.811 1 56 57 215 84.56 1.75 0.3 2 57 59 219 86.191 1.63 0.26 3 57 59 219 87.911 1.72 0.3 4 58 59 219 89.741 1.83 0.34 5 57 59 219 91.66 1.92 0.37 6 57 60 219 93.391 1.73 0.33 7 58 60 216 95.271 1.88 0.35 8 58 61 214 97.061 1.79 0.32 9 58 61 213 98.791 1.73 0.3 10 58 62 212 100.589 1.80 0.32 11 59 62 211 102.391 1.80 0.32 12 59 62 210 104.341 1.95 0.36 13 59 63 210 106.291 1.95 0.36 14 60 64 210 108.191 1.90 0.34 15 60 64 210 110.141 1.95 0.36 16 60 65 210 112.181 2.04 0.41 17 61 66 209 114.311 2.13 0.45 18 61 66 209 116.411 2.10 0.43 19 62 67 210 118.161 1.75 0.27 20 62 68 209 119.801 1.64 0.25 21 62 68 209 121.861 2.06 0.43 22 63 68 209 124.001 2.14 0.44 23 63 69 209 126.001 2.00 0.38 24 64 70 209 127.821 1.82 0.29 25 64 70 209 129.499 1.68 0.25 Ave meter temperature -Tm °F 61.42 212.46 °R 521.42 672.46 total =45.01 45.01 average = 59.54 63.29 212.46 0.35 Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas Velocity Point Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume Head Outlet (°F) Inlet (°F)ts Vm Vm DP Run #1 Page 3 of 18 28 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Probe Filter Diff DP Time Time Temperature Temperature DH Tt Exit (in H2O)(min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) (°F)(°F) 850 1.24 0.55 2.5 852.5 1.4 250 248 1.07 0.51 2.5 855 1.3 248 247 1.24 0.55 2.5 857.5 1.4 247 252 1.40 0.58 2.5 900 1.6 248 242 1.52 0.61 2.5 902.5 1.7 247 240 1.36 0.57 2.5 909 1.6 242 248 1.45 0.59 2.5 911.5 1.7 248 253 1.33 0.57 2.5 914 1.6 248 251 1.25 0.55 2.5 916.5 1.5 250 249 1.34 0.57 2.5 919 1.6 248 251 1.34 0.57 2.5 925 1.6 248 253 1.51 0.60 2.5 927.5 1.8 248 248 1.51 0.60 2.5 930 1.8 246 246 1.43 0.58 2.5 932.5 1.7 239 252 1.51 0.60 2.5 935 1.8 247 250 1.73 0.64 2.5 939 2 246 249 1.90 0.67 2.5 941.5 2.2 249 249 1.82 0.66 2.5 944 2.1 250 250 1.14 0.52 2.5 946.5 1.5 243 250 1.06 0.50 2.5 949 1.6 253 248 1.82 0.66 2.5 952 2.1 251 252 1.87 0.66 2.5 954.5 2.2 245 251 1.61 0.62 2.5 957 1.9 257 250 1.23 0.54 2.5 959.5 1.5 255 249 1.06 0.50 2.5 1002 1.4 246 250 62.5 62.5 1.4456 0.5855 2.50 1.70 247.96 249.12 Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Probe Exit Filter Diff DP Time Time Temperature Temperature DH (°F)(°F) Run #1 Page 4 of 18 29 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Impinger CPM Filter Vs Point to CPM Filter CPM Filter Temperature Temperature Point Purge Temperature Outlet Isokinetics Time (PURGE) (°F) (65-85°F)(min) (65-85°F) 58 68 39.13 95.78 0 68 57 70 36.53 95.81 15 71 59 75 39.24 94.16 30 71 62 77 41.78 94.07 45 72 62 80 43.58 94.67 60 72 62 80 41.16 90.31 60 74 42.29 94.96 70.80 57 77 40.38 94.31 CPM Filter 55 78 39.07 94.04 Temperature 55 79 40.32 94.51 (°F) 56 79 40.29 94.56 56 79 42.70 96.45 56 80 42.70 96.37 59 80 41.50 96.43 59 80 42.70 96.20 57 81 45.57 94.28 57 82 47.71 93.77 59 82 46.64 94.55 61 83 36.98 99.15 61 83 35.56 96.39 61 83 46.64 92.51 61 82 47.17 94.93 62 82 43.84 95.32 62 81 38.30 99.02 62 82 35.56 98.28 Final Leak Check Pitot Tubes 59.04 79.08 Finish 129.517 A = ok Outlet Impinger CPM Filter Start 129.517 B = ok Temperature Temperature Rate 0 (°F)(°F)Vac = 5 Run #1 Page 5 of 18 30 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Symbol Description Units Value 1 Vm Volume at gas meter dcf 45.0100 2 Vm std Dry gas volume at standard conditions dscf 38.4378 3 Vm Iso Meter volume @ Isokinetic conditions ft3 46.4953 4 Vm Q Volume of gas per minute @ dry conditions dscf/min 0.6150 5 Vw gas Volume water vapor in gas sample scf 3.6319 6 Bws Moisture content, proportion by volume 0.0863 7 Md Dry molecular weight lb/lb mole 29.0160 8 Ms Wet molecular weight lb/lb mole 28.0650 9 Iso Isokinetic variation % 91.267 10 Vs Stack gas velocity ft/sec 41.75 11 Qsd Volumetric flow rate @ dry basis dscf/hr 2.1170E+06 12 Qa Actual volumetric flow rate ft3/hr 3.6329.E+06 13 Cs Particulate concentration is stack g/dscf 0.0000E+00 14 CO Carbon Monoxide concentration in stack %0 15 CO2 Carbon dioxide concentration in stack %3.10 16 O2 Oxygen concentration in stack %13.00 17 N2 Nitrogen concentration in stack %83.90 18 Vw Total moisture collected g 77.16 TEST RESULTS Run #1 Page 6 of 18 31 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC. 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 801-794-2950 1 Plant W. W. CLYDE 2 City Duchesne, Utah 3 Stack Name DILLMAN 500 4 Operator Austin Tramell 5 Date 8/27/2024 6 Reference Method EPA 5/202 7 Run #2 Compliance 8 Stack Diameter - f 66.57 inches 9 Stack Area - As 24.17 square feet 10 Sample Box Number es 11 Meter Box Number c-5000 12 Meter ^H@ 1.641 13 Meter Calibration - Y 1.033 14 Pitot Tube - Cp 0.84 15 Probe Length 5' B feet 16 Probe Liner Material Glass 17 Probe Heater Setting 248 °F 18 Ambient Temperature 68 °F 19 Barometric Pressure - Pbar 24.33 inches Hg 20 Stack Gas Pressure - Ps 24.30 inches Hg 21 Assumed Moisture 12.00 % 22 Static Pressure - Pg -0.35 inches H20 23 C Factor 0 24 Reference DP 0.34 inches H20 25 Nozzle Identification Number a 26 Nozzle Diameter - Dn 0.291 inches 27 Cross-sectional area of nozzle - An 4.62E-04 square feet 28 Thermometer Number #1-A 29 Pretest Leak Rate 0.000 cfm 30 Leak Check Vacuum 15 inches H2O 31 Filter Number 4 32 Initial leak Check Pitot Tubes Finish 129.668 A= OK Start 129.668 B= OK Rate 0 Vac = 15 PARTICULATE FIELD DATA Run #2 Page 7 of 18 32 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 PRETEST CALCULATIONS NOZZLE DIAMETER ISOKINETIC ^H Dn = 0.291 ^H = 0.95 constant 0.0357 Cp 0.84 constant 849.80 Qm 0.75 Imp V(H2O)(ml)67.50 ^H@ 1.00 Pb(in HG) 24.33 Gel H2O(g) 12.00 Md 29.00 Pg(in H2O) -0.35 V(H2O)(ml) 127.80 Mm 29.00 Ps 24.30 Vm(acf) 49.23 K 2.75 Cp 0.84 ^h avg 0.20 ^P 0.34 Tm(°F)68 Vwc 6.02 ^H = 0.95 Tm(°R)528 Vmc 41.36 Bwm 0 Bws = 0.13 Bws 0.12 Ts(°F)209 Ts(°R)669 Md 29.0000 Ms 27.6800 Pb(in HG) 24.33 Pg(in H2O) -0.35 Ps 24.30 (^P)avg 0.34 Dn =0.263 Pm 24.44 PRETEST DATA Run #2 Page 8 of 18 33 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas Velocity Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume Head Outlet Inlet ts Vm difference DP (°F)(°F)(°F)(ft3)(ft3)(in H2O) starting 129.714 1 67 69 209 131.48 1.77 0.31 2 67 69 221 133.17 1.69 0.28 3 67 69 220 135.01 1.84 0.32 4 67 70 218 136.86 1.85 0.33 5 68 70 218 138.87 2.01 0.39 6 68 71 217 140.74 1.87 0.33 7 68 72 216 142.65 1.91 0.35 8 68 73 216 144.56 1.91 0.34 9 69 73 215 146.34 1.78 0.29 10 69 74 215 148.17 1.83 0.32 11 69 75 215 150.03 1.86 0.32 12 69 75 215 151.91 1.88 0.34 13 70 76 215 153.92 2.01 0.38 14 71 77 215 155.77 1.85 0.31 15 71 77 215 157.68 1.91 0.35 16 72 78 216 159.71 2.03 0.39 17 72 78 216 161.84 2.13 0.43 18 73 79 215 164.02 2.18 0.44 19 73 80 215 165.82 1.80 0.29 20 74 80 215 167.42 1.60 0.24 21 74 80 215 169.46 2.04 0.41 22 74 81 215 171.61 2.15 0.42 23 75 82 214 173.61 2.00 0.36 24 76 82 215 175.46 1.85 0.31 25 76 82 214 177.223 1.76 0.27 Ave meter temperature -Tm °F 72.94 215.67 °R 532.94 675.67 total =45.75 45.75 average = 70.46 75.42 215.67 0.34 Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas Velocity Point Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume Head Outlet (°F) Inlet (°F)ts Vm Vm DP Run #2 Page 9 of 18 34 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Probe Filter Diff DP Time Time Temperature Temperature DH Tt Exit (in H2O)(min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) (°F)(°F) 1046 1.40 0.56 2.5 1048.5 3.4 250 240 1.24 0.53 2.5 1051 2.7 253 245 1.42 0.57 2.5 1053.5 3.1 250 249 1.47 0.57 2.5 1056 3.2 252 253 1.74 0.62 2.5 1058.5 3.6 248 252 1.48 0.57 2.5 1103 3.1 247 252 1.57 0.59 2.5 1105.5 3.2 252 251 1.53 0.58 2.5 1108 3.1 251 250 1.30 0.54 2.5 1110.5 2.7 250 250 1.44 0.57 2.5 1113 3.1 250 249 1.44 0.57 2.5 1116 3.1 252 252 1.53 0.58 2.5 1118.5 3.3 252 248 1.72 0.62 2.5 1121 3.6 251 250 1.40 0.56 2.5 1123.5 3 250 250 1.58 0.59 2.5 1126 3.3 246 251 1.77 0.62 2.5 1128 3.7 254 250 1.95 0.66 2.5 1130.5 4.1 246 249 2.00 0.66 2.5 1133 4.3 248 250 1.32 0.54 2.5 1135.5 2.9 252 250 1.09 0.49 2.5 1138 2.3 251 250 1.87 0.64 2.5 1141 3.9 247 251 1.91 0.65 2.5 1143.5 4.1 251 250 1.64 0.60 2.5 1146 3.6 250 250 1.42 0.56 2.5 1148.5 3.1 250 243 1.23 0.52 2.5 1151 2.7 249 252 62.5 62.5 1.55 0.5848 2.50 3.29 250.08 249.48 Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Probe Exit Filter Diff DP Time Time Temperature TemperatureDH(°F)(°F) Run #2 Page 10 of 18 35 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Impinger CPM Filter Vs Point to CPM Filter CPM Filter Temperature Temperature Point Purge Temperature Outlet Isokinetics Time (PURGE) (°F) (65-85°F)(min) (65-85°F) 60 79 39.71 93.69 0 74 60 79 38.07 95.14 15 74 60 79 40.67 96.87 30 74 58 71 41.24 95.70 45 74 58 70 44.84 95.63 60 75 57 69 41.21 96.50 56 69 42.41 95.58 74.20 55 68 41.80 96.88 CPM Filter 54 68 38.58 97.54 Temperature 54 68 40.52 95.42 (°F) 54 68 40.52 96.90 54 68 41.77 95.05 52 69 44.16 96.01 53 71 39.89 97.58 54 72 42.38 94.86 54 72 44.77 95.47 55 73 47.01 95.45 55 73 47.52 96.35 57 74 38.58 97.73 57 74 35.09 95.36 57 74 45.87 93.21 55 75 46.43 97.00 53 73 42.95 97.15 53 73 39.89 96.77 51 72 37.20 98.70 Final Leak Check Pitot Tubes 55.44 72.04 Finish 177.267 A = ok Outlet Impinger CPM Filter Start 177.267 B = ok Temperature Temperature Rate (°F)(°F)6 Run #2 Page 11 of 18 36 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Symbol Description Units Value 1 Vm Volume at gas meter dcf 45.7460 2 Vm std Dry gas volume at standard conditions dscf 38.2339 3 Vm Iso Meter volume @ Isokinetic conditions ft3 47.2556 4 Vm Q Volume of gas per minute @ dry conditions dscf/min 0.6117 5 Vw gas Volume water vapor in gas sample scf 4.2085 6 Bws Moisture content, proportion by volume 0.0992 7 Md Dry molecular weight lb/lb mole 29.0000 8 Ms Wet molecular weight lb/lb mole 27.9093 9 Iso Isokinetic variation % 92.108 10 Vs Stack gas velocity ft/sec 41.91 11 Qsd Volumetric flow rate @ dry basis dscf/hr 2.0857E+06 12 Qa Actual volumetric flow rate ft3/hr 3.6474.E+06 13 Cs Particulate concentration is stack g/dscf 0.0000E+00 14 CO Carbon Monoxide concentration in stack %0 15 CO2 Carbon dioxide concentration in stack %3.00 16 O2 Oxygen concentration in stack %13.00 17 N2 Nitrogen concentration in stack %84.00 18 Vw Total moisture collected g 89.41 Run #2: #REF! Average: #REF! % Diff:#REF! Run #2:1.0997 Average:#REF! % Diff: #REF! TEST RESULTS 0 0 Run #2 Page 12 of 18 37 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC. 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 801-794-2950 1 Plant W. W. CLYDE 2 City Duchesne, Utah 3 Stack Name DILLMAN 500 4 Operator Austin Tramell 5 Date 8/27/2024 6 Reference Method EPA 5/202 7 Run #3 Compliance 8 Stack Diameter - f 66.57 inches 9 Stack Area - As 24.17 square feet 10 Sample Box Number es 11 Meter Box Number c-5000 12 Meter ^H@ 1.641 13 Meter Calibration - Y 1.033 14 Pitot Tube - Cp 0.84 15 Probe Length 5' B feet 16 Probe Liner Material Glass 17 Probe Heater Setting 248 °F 18 Ambient Temperature 71 °F 19 Barometric Pressure - Pbar 24.33 inches Hg 20 Stack Gas Pressure - Ps 24.30 inches Hg 21 Assumed Moisture 11 % 22 Static Pressure - Pg -0.35 inches H20 23 C Factor 0 24 Reference DP 0.34 inches H20 25 Nozzle Identification Number a 26 Nozzle Diameter - Dn 0.291 inches 27 Cross-sectional area of nozzle - An 4.62E-04 square feet 28 Thermometer Number #1-A 29 Pretest Leak Rate 0.000 cfm 30 Leak Check Vacuum 15 inches H2O 31 Filter Number 580 32 Initial leak Check Pitot Tubes Finish 177.418 A= OK Start 177.418 B= OK Rate 0 Vac = 15 PARTICULATE FIELD DATA Run #3 Page 13 of 18 38 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 PRETEST CALCULATIONS NOZZLE DIAMETER ISOKINETIC ^H Dn = 0.291 ^H = 0.98 constant 0.0357 Cp 0.84 constant 849.80 Qm 0.75 Imp V(H2O)(ml)67.50 ^H@ 1.00 Pb(in HG) 24.33 Gel H2O(g) 12.00 Md 29.01 Pg(in H2O) -0.35 V(H2O)(ml) 127.80 Mm 29.01 Ps 24.30 Vm(acf) 49.23 K 2.84 Cp 0.84 ^h avg 0.20 ^P 0.34 Tm(°F)79 Vwc 6.02 ^H = 0.98 Tm(°R)539 Vmc 40.52 Bwm 0 Bws = 0.13 Bws 0.11 Ts(°F)215 Ts(°R)675 Md 29.0080 Ms 27.7971 Pb(in HG) 24.33 Pg(in H2O) -0.35 Ps 24.30 (^P)avg 0.34375 Dn =0.261 Pm 24.45 PRETEST DATA Run #3 Page 14 of 18 39 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas Velocity Point Temperature Temperature Temp Volume Volume Head Outlet Inlet ts Vm difference DP (°F)(°F)(°F)(ft3)(ft3)(in H2O) starting 177.458 1 79 80 215 179.31 1.85 0.32 2 79 81 216 181.16 1.85 0.3 3 79 81 216 183.01 1.85 0.3 4 79 82 217 184.99 1.98 0.35 5 79 82 217 187 2.01 0.4 6 80 83 218 189.11 2.11 0.35 7 79 83 218 191.11 2.00 0.35 8 80 84 218 193.13 2.02 0.36 9 80 85 218 195.01 1.88 0.31 10 80 86 218 196.86 1.85 0.3 11 81 86 219 198.73 1.87 0.31 12 81 87 219 200.71 1.98 0.35 13 82 87 219 202.85 2.14 0.4 14 82 88 218 204.79 1.94 0.33 15 83 89 218 206.86 2.07 0.37 16 83 89 218 208.94 2.08 0.36 17 84 90 218 211.13 2.19 0.41 18 84 90 218 213.37 2.24 0.44 19 84 91 218 215.27 1.90 0.3 20 85 91 218 217.01 1.74 0.26 21 86 91 218 219.11 2.10 0.39 22 86 92 218 221.27 2.16 0.4 23 86 92 219 223.26 1.99 0.34 24 87 93 218 225.26 2.00 0.34 25 87 93 218 227.128 1.87 0.29 Ave meter temperature -Tm °F 84.40 217.79 °R 544.40 677.79 total =47.80 47.80 average = 82.00 86.79 217.79 0.35 Sample Meter Meter Stack Gas Gas Velocity Point Temperature Temperature Temp (°F) Volume Volume Head Outlet (°F) Inlet (°F)ts Vm Vm DP Run #3 Page 15 of 18 40 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Probe Filter Diff DP Time Time Temperature Temperature DH Tt Exit (in H2O)(min) (24 hrs) (in Hg) (°F)(°F) 1219 1.49 0.57 2.5 1221.5 2 247 248 1.40 0.55 2.5 1224 1.9 259 239 1.40 0.55 2.5 1226.5 1.9 250 243 1.63 0.59 2.5 1229 2.2 248 249 1.86 0.63 2.5 1231.5 2.4 247 252 1.63 0.59 2.5 1236 2.1 247 252 1.63 0.59 2.5 1238.5 2.1 243 251 1.68 0.60 2.5 1241 2.2 245 251 1.45 0.56 2.5 1243.5 2 250 252 1.40 0.55 2.5 1246 1.9 246 251 1.45 0.56 2.5 1250 2 252 25 1.63 0.59 2.5 1252.5 2.4 252 247 1.87 0.63 2.5 1255 2.5 252 251 1.55 0.57 2.5 1257.5 2.1 244 249 1.74 0.61 2.5 1300 2.4 251 250 1.69 0.60 2.5 1303 2.5 254 247 1.93 0.64 2.5 1305.5 2.6 248 252 2.07 0.66 2.5 1308 2.8 248 252 1.41 0.55 2.5 1310.5 2 252 254 1.22 0.51 2.5 1313 1.9 254 247 1.84 0.62 2.5 1316 2.4 248 248 1.89 0.63 2.5 1318.5 2.5 248 253 1.60 0.58 2.5 1321 2.2 248 249 1.61 0.58 2.5 1323.5 2.2 252 251 1.37 0.54 2.5 1326 2 250 250 62.5 62.5 1.63 0.5884 2.50 \2.21 249.40 240.52 Pressure Sqrt Sampling Clock Vacuum Probe Exit Filter Diff DP Time Time Temperature TemperatureDH(°F)(°F) Run #3 Page 16 of 18 41 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Impinger CPM Filter Vs Point to CPM Filter CPM Filter Temperature Temperature Point Purge Temperature Outlet Isokinetics Time (PURGE) (°F) (65-85°F)(min) (65-85°F) 60 68 40.48 94.71 0 74 60 68 39.22 97.67 15 76 60 68 39.22 97.67 30 76 59 68 42.40 96.83 45 76 59 66 45.33 92.01 60 76 53 66 42.43 103.09 51 67 42.43 97.80 75.60 51 67 43.03 97.25 CPM Filter 51 67 39.93 97.39 Temperature 51 67 39.28 97.33 (°F) 51 67 39.96 96.78 51 67 42.46 96.41 50 67 45.39 97.45 51 68 41.20 97.03 51 68 43.63 97.66 51 69 43.03 99.48 50 69 45.92 98.04 50 69 47.57 96.84 50 69 39.28 99.22 51 72 36.57 97.47 51 72 44.79 96.13 51 72 45.36 97.57 52 73 41.85 97.49 51 74 41.82 97.75 51 74 38.62 98.80 Final Leak Check Pitot Tubes 52.68 68.88 Finish 227.156 A = ok Outlet Impinger CPM Filter Start 227.156 B = ok Temperature Temperature Rate (°F)(°F)Vac = 7 Run #3 Page 17 of 18 42 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Symbol Description Units Value 1 Vm Volume at gas meter dcf 47.8020 2 Vm std Dry gas volume at standard conditions dscf 39.1203 3 Vm Iso Meter volume @ Isokinetic conditions ft3 49.3795 4 Vm Q Volume of gas per minute @ dry conditions dscf/min 0.6259 5 Vw gas Volume water vapor in gas sample scf 4.0833 6 Bws Moisture content, proportion by volume 0.0945 7 Md Dry molecular weight lb/lb mole 29.0080 8 Ms Wet molecular weight lb/lb mole 27.9676 9 Iso Isokinetic variation % 93.431 10 Vs Stack gas velocity ft/sec 42.19 11 Qsd Volumetric flow rate @ dry basis dscf/hr 2.1038E+06 12 Qa Actual volumetric flow rate ft3/hr 3.6717.E+06 13 Cs Particulate concentration is stack g/dscf 0.0000E+00 14 CO Carbon Monoxide concentration in stack %0 15 CO2 Carbon dioxide concentration in stack %3.10 16 O2 Oxygen concentration in stack %12.80 17 N2 Nitrogen concentration in stack %84.10 18 Vw Total moisture collected g 86.75 Run #3: #REF! Average: #REF! % Diff:#REF! Run #3:1.0944 Average:#REF! % Diff: #REF! TEST RESULTS 0 0 Run #3 Page 18 of 18 43 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Company:Run Number: 1 Compliance Sampling Location:Date: 8/27/2024 Initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain Description. Drop Out 358.78 379.45 20.67 g Impinger 1 607.94 634.95 27.01 g Impinger 2 707.92 728.47 20.55 g Impinger 3 812.59 821.52 8.93 g Additional H20 Vp (if needed)77.16 g Front-Half Analysis (Nozzle, Probe, Filter and Oven Glassware) 1 Filter Final Weight g 2 Filter Tare Weight g 5 Filter ID # 3 Total Filter Weight g 4 Particulate caught in Description nozzle, probe and glassware g 5 Total Front-Half Catch (Mn)g x 1000 = 8.7 mg Back-Half Analysis (Impinger solution, CPM Filter and Connecting Glassware) 1 CPM Container #1 (Water)g 2 CPM Container #2 (Acetone/Hexane)g 3 Total Back-Half Catch (Mn)g x 1000 = 11 mg Total Particulate Catch (Sum of Front and Back-Half Catches) g x 1000 = 19.7 mg Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC. 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 801-794-2950 0.0110 0.0197 Moisture and Particulate Data EPA Method 5/202 Total Gain (Vw) = Particulate Collected Moisture Collected 0.0087 0.0032 0.3843 0.3788 0.0055 0.0102 0.0008 W. W. CLYDE DILLMAN 500 44 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Company:Run Number: 2 Compliance Sampling Location:Date: 8/27/2024 Initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain Description. Drop Out 358.12 423.79 65.67 g Impinger 1 581.63 586.96 5.33 g Impinger 2 678.61 686.4 7.79 g Impinger 3 843.04 853.66 10.62 g Additional H20 Vp (if needed)89.41 g Front-Half Analysis (Nozzle, Probe, Filter and Oven Glassware) 1 Filter Final Weight g 2 Filter Tare Weight g 4 Filter ID # 3 Total Filter Weight g 4 Particulate caught in Description nozzle, probe and glassware g 5 Total Front-Half Catch (Mn)g x 1000 = 7.3 mg Back-Half Analysis (Impinger solution, CPM Filter and Connecting Glassware) 1 CPM Container #1 (Water)g 2 CPM Container #2 (Acetone/Hexane)g 3 Total Back-Half Catch (Mn)g x 1000 = 14.1 mg Total Particulate Catch (Sum of Front and Back-Half Catches) g x 1000 = 21.4 mg EPA Method 5/202 W. W. CLYDE 0.3789 0.0056 0.0017 DILLMAN 500 Moisture Collected Total Gain (Vw) = Particulate Collected 0.3845 Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC. 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 801-794-2950 Moisture and Particulate Data 0.0006 0.0141 0.0214 0.0073 0.0135 45 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Company:Run Number: 3 Compliance Sampling Location:Date: 8/27/2024 Initial Weight Final Weight Weight Gain Description. Drop Out 358.25 424.36 66.11 g Impinger 1 608.84 614.07 5.23 g Impinger 2 727.85 733.21 5.36 g Impinger 3 812.67 822.72 10.05 g Additional H20 Vp (if needed)86.75 g Front-Half Analysis (Nozzle, Probe, Filter and Oven Glassware) 1 Filter Final Weight g 2 Filter Tare Weight g 580 Filter ID # 3 Total Filter Weight g 4 Particulate caught in Description nozzle, probe and glassware g 5 Total Front-Half Catch (Mn)g x 1000 = 8.2 mg Back-Half Analysis (Impinger solution, CPM Filter and Connecting Glassware) 1 CPM Container #1 (Water)g 2 CPM Container #2 (Acetone/Hexane)g 3 Total Back-Half Catch (Mn)g x 1000 = 5.9 mg Total Particulate Catch (Sum of Front and Back-Half Catches) g x 1000 = 14.1 mg Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC. 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 0.0013 0.0059 0.0141 801-794-2950 Moisture and Particulate Data EPA Method 5/202 W. W. CLYDE DILLMAN 500 Moisture Collected Total Gain (Vw) = Particulate Collected 0.3868 0.3806 0.0062 0.002 0.0082 0.0046 46 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Company: W. W. CLYDE Run Number: 1 Compliance DILLMAN 500 Date: 8/27/2024 Sample #O2 1 13 2 13 3 13 Average 13.00 O2 0.3% when O2 4.0%0.3% when CO2 15.0% 0.2% when O2 4.0%0.2% when CO2 15.0% Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC. 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 801-794-2950 83.9 3.1  0.1 CO 83.9 Sampling Location: N2 CO2 Volume Percent - Dry Basis Gas Analysis Form (Average of 3 analyses each)  0.3%  0.1  0.1 CO2  0.0183.90 3.10 3.1 3.1 CO 83.9 47 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Company: W. W. CLYDE Run Number: 2 Compliance DILLMAN 500 Date: 8/27/2024 Sample #O2 1 13 2 13 3 13 Average 13.00 O2 0.3% when O2 4.0%0.3% when CO2 15.0% 0.2% when O2 4.0%0.2% when CO2 15.0% Sampling Location: N2 CO2 84 Volume Percent - Dry Basis Gas Analysis Form (Average of 3 analyses each) CO 3 3 Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC. 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 801-794-2950  0.3% 3  0.1  0.1 CO2  0.1  0.01 CO 84.00 3.00 84 84 48 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Company: W. W. CLYDE Run Number: 3 Compliance DILLMAN 500 Date: 8/27/2024 Sample #O2 1 12.8 2 12.8 3 12.8 Average 12.80 O2 0.3% when O2 4.0%0.3% when CO2 15.0% 0.2% when O2 4.0%0.2% when CO2 15.0% Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC. 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 801-794-2950 84.1 3.1  0.1 CO 84.1 Sampling Location: N2 CO2 Volume Percent - Dry Basis Gas Analysis Form (Average of 3 analyses each)  0.3%  0.1  0.1 CO2  0.0184.10 3.10 3.1 3.1 CO 84.1 49 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 50 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 51 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 52 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, NV 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Appendix A.4 Example Calculations 53 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Run #1 Sample Calculations EPA Methods 5 and 202, Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions from Stationary Sources and Dry Impinger Method for Determining Condensable Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources Variables Variable Value Definition Unit of Measurement Ds 66.57 Stack Diameter inches A 24.17 Cross-Sectional Area of the Stack ft2 Pg -0.35 Stack Static Pressure in. H2O Pg -0.03 Stack Static Pressure in. Hg %CO2 3.1 Concentration of Carbon Dioxide Dry Volume Percent (%vd) %O2 13.0 Concentration of Oxygen Dry Volume Percent (%vd) Md 29.02 Dry Molecular Weight of the Stack Gas (default)lb/lb-mole Pbar 24.33 Barometric Pressure in. Hg ∆H 1.45 Pressure Differential across Orifice in. H2O Pm 24.44 Absolute Pressure at Gas Meter in.Hg tm 61 Temperature at Gas Meter °F Tm 521 Absolute Temperature at Gas Meter °R K1 0.04706 Conversion Factor ft3/mL Vlc 77.2 Volume of Water Condensed g Vwc(std)3.63 Volume of Water Condensed scf K4 17.64 Constant °R/in.Hg Y 1.0330 Meter Calibration Factor Unitless Vm 45.01 Volume of Stack Gas Collected dcf Vm(std)38.438 Sample Gas Volume dscf Bws 0.086 Stack Gas Moisture Content %/100 Ms 28.06 Actual Molecular Weight of the Stack Gas lb/lb-mole Ps 24.30 Absolute Stack Pressure in. Hg Ts 212.46 Average Stack Temperature °F Ts(abs)672 Average Absolute Stack Temperature °R Kp 85.49 Conversion Factor (ft/sec) x √(((lb/lb-mole)(in.Hg))/((°R)(in.H2O))) Cp 0.84 Pitot Coefficient Dimensionless Avg√∆p 0.5855 Average Square Root of Velocity Head Readings in. H2O Vs 41.75 Average Stack Gas Velocity ft/sec Tstd 528 Standard Absolute Temperature °R Pstd 29.92 Standard Absolute Pressure in. Hg Q 2,117,032 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate Corrected to Standard Conditions dscf/hr Dn 0.291 Nozzle Diameter inches An 4.62E-04 Cross-Sectional Area of the Nozzle ft2 mn 19.7 Total PM and CPM Mass mg Cs 1.13E-06 Particulate Concentration lb/dscf Elb/hr 2.39 PM Mass Emission Rate pounds per hour Fc 1840 F-Factor from EPA Method 19 scf/mmBtu Elb/mmBtu N/A PM Mass Emission Rate pounds per million Btu Etons/yr 0.0 PM Mass Emission Rate tons per year K5 0.0945 Constant (in.Hg · min) / (°R · sec) Ѳ 62.5 Sample Time minutes I 91.3 % Isokinetic variation percent DILLMAN 500 W. W. CLYDE Duchesne, Utah August 27, 2024 54 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 DILLMAN 500 W. W. CLYDE Duchesne, Utah Run #1 Sample Calculations EPA Methods 5 and 202, Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions from Stationary Sources and Dry Impinger Method for Determining Condensable Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources A=π(Ds/24)2 π(66.5743708586352/24)^2 =24.17 ft^2 Pg =Pg/13.6 =-0.35/13.6 =-0.03 in. Hg Md =(0.44 x %CO2) + (0.32 x %O2) + 0.28(100-%CO2-%O2) =(0.44 x 3.1) + (0.32 x 13.0) + 0.28(100 - 3.1 - 13.0) =29.02 lb/lb-mole Pm =Pbar + (∆H/13.6) =24.33 + (1.44555480588728/13.6) =24.44 in. Hg Tm =460 + tm=460 + 61.4166666666667 =521 R Vwc(std) =K1 x Vlc=0.04706 x 77.16 =3.631 scf (Eq. 4-1) Vm(std)=K4 x Y x Vm x Pm Tm =17.64 x 1.033 x 45.01 x 24.44 521 =38.438 dscf (Eq. 4-3) Bws=Vwc(std) Vwc(std) + Vm(std) =3.631 3.631 + 38.438 =0.086 (%/100)(Eq. 4-4) Ms =Md x (1-Bws) + (18.0 x Bws) =(0.44 x 3.1) + (0.32 x 13.0) + 0.28(100 - 3.1 - 13.0) x (1 - 0.086) + (18.0 x 0.086) =28.06 lb/lb-mole (Eq. 2-6) Ps=Pbar + Pg= 24.33 + (-0.03) =24.30 in. Hg Ts(abs) =460 + Ts=460 + 212.458333333333 =672 R August 27, 2024 55 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 DILLMAN 500 W. W. CLYDE Duchesne, Utah Run #1 Sample Calculations EPA Methods 5 and 202, Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions from Stationary Sources and Dry Impinger Method for Determining Condensable Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources Vs =Kp x Cp x Avg√∆p x =85.49 x 0.84 x 0.585465640703785 x =41.7 ft/sec (Eq. 2-7) Q =3600 x (1-Bws) x (Vs) x (A) x =3600 x (1 - 0.086) x (41.75) x (24.17) x =2,117,032 dscf/hr (Eq. 2-8) An =π(Dn/24)2 π(0.291/24)^2 =4.62E-04 ft^2 Cs = mn (mg/g) (g/lb) (Vm(std)) =19.7 (1000) (453.592) (38.438) =1.13E-06 lb/dscf Elb/hr =Cs x Q = 1.13E-06 x 2117032 =2.39 lb/hr Elb/ton HMA production =Elb/hr, avg (tons HMA per hour, avg) =2.39 345.72 =0.0069 lb/ton HMA production I = = =91.3 % (Eq. 5-7) Ts(abs) (Ps x Ms) 672 (24.30 x 28.06) (Tstd x Ps) (Ts(abs) x Pstd) (528 x 24.30) (672 x 29.92) August 27, 2024 24.30 x 41.75 x 4.6E-04 x 63 x (1 - 0.086) K5 x Ts(abs) x Vm(std) x 100 Ps(abs) x Vs x An x Ѳ x (1-Bws) 0.0945 x 672 x 38.438 x 100 56 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, NV 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Appendix B Facility Process Data 57 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 58 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, NV 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Appendix C Laboratory Data 59 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 60 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 61 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 62 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 63 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 64 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, NV 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Appendix D Quality Assurance/Quality Control 65 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, NV 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Appendix D.1 Units and Abbreviations 66 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 @ X% O2 corrected to X% oxygen (corrected for dilution air) |CC|absolute value of the confidence coefficient |d|absolute value of the mean differences ºC degrees Celsius ºF degrees Fahrenheit ºR degrees Rankine " H2O inches of water column 13.6 specific gravity of mercury ΔH pressure drop across orifice meter, inches H2O ΔP velocity head of stack gas, inches H2O θ total sampling time, minutes µg microgram ρa density of acetone, mg/ml ρw density of water, 0.9982 g/ml or 0.002201 lb/ml acfm actual cubic feet of gas per minute at stack conditions An cross-sectional area of nozzle, ft2 As cross-sectional area of stack, square feet (ft2) Btu British thermal unit Bws proportion by volume of water vapor in gas stream Ca particulate matter concentration in stack gas, gr/acf CAvg average unadjusted gas concentration, ppmv CDir measured concentration of calibration gas, ppmv cf or ft3 cubic feet cfm cubic feet per minute CGas average gas concentration adjusted for bias, ppmv CM average of initial and final system bias check responses from upscale calibration gas, ppmv cm or m3 cubic meters CMA actual concentration of the upscale calibration gas, ppmv CO average of initial and final system bias check responses from low-level calibration gas, ppmv Cp pitot tube coefficient Cs particulate matter concentration in stack gas, gr/dscf CS calibration span, % or ppmv CS measured concentration of calibration gas, ppmv CV manufactured certified concentration of calibration gas, ppmv D drift assessment, % of span dcf dry cubic feet dcm dry cubic meters Dn diameter of nozzle, inches Ds diameter of stack, inches dscf dry standard cubic feet dscfm dry standard cubic feet per minute dscm dry standard cubic meters Fd F-factor, dscf/MMBtu of heat input fpm feet per minute fps feet per second ft feet ft2 square feet g gram gal gallons gr grains (7000 grains per pound) UNITS OF MEASUREMENT 67 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 UNITS OF MEASUREMENT gr/dscf grains per dry standard cubic feet hr hour I percent of isokinetic sampling in inch k kilo or thousand (metric units, multiply by 103) K kelvin (temperature) K3 conversion factor 0.0154 gr/mg K4 conversion factor 0.002668 ((in. Hg)(ft3))/((ml)(°R)) kg kilogram Kp pitot tube constant (85.49 ft/sec) kwscfh thousand wet standard cubic feet per hour l liters lb/hr pounds per hour lb/MMBtu pounds per million Btu lpm liters per minute m meter or milli M thousand (English units) or mega (million, metric units) m3 cubic meters ma mass of residue of acetone after evaporation, mg Md molecular weight of stack gas; dry basis, lb/lb-mole meq milliequivalent mg milligram Mg megagram (106 grams) min minute ml or mL milliliter mm millimeter MM million (English units) MMBtu/hr million Btu per hour mn total amount of particulate matter collected, mg mol mole mol. wt. or MW molecular weight Ms molecular weight of stack gas; wet basis, lb/lb-mole MW molecular weight or megawatt n number of data points ng nanogram nm nanometer Nm3 normal cubic meter Pbar barometric pressure, inches Hg pg picogram Pg stack static pressure, inches H2O Pm barometric pressure of dry gas meter, inches Hg ppb parts per billion ppbv parts per billion, by volume ppbvd parts per billion by volume, dry basis ppm parts per million ppmv parts per million, by volume ppmvd parts per million by volume, dry basis ppmvw parts per million by volume, wet basis Ps absolute stack gas pressure, inches Hg psi pounds per square inch psia pounds per square inch absolute psig pounds per square inch gauge 68 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 UNITS OF MEASUREMENT Pstd standard absolute pressure, 29.92 inches Hg Qa volumetric flow rate, actual conditions, acfm Qs volumetric flow rate, standard conditions, scfm Qstd volumetric flow rate, dry standard conditions, dscfm R ideal gas constant 21.85 ((in. Hg) (ft3))/((°R) (lbmole)) SBfinal post-run system bias check, % of span SBi pre-run system bias check, % of span scf standard cubic feet scfh standard cubic feet per hour scfm standard cubic feet per minute scm standard cubic meters scmh standard cubic meters per hour sec second sf, sq. ft., or ft2 square feet std standard t metric ton (1000 kg) T 0.975 t-value Ta absolute average ambient temperature, ºR (+459.67 for English) Tm absolute average dry gas meter temperature, ºR (+459.67 for English) ton or t ton = 2000 pounds tph or tons/hr tons per hour tpy or tons/yr tons per year Ts absolute average stack gas meter temperature, ºR (+459.67 for English) Tstd absolute temperature at standard conditions V volt Va volume of acetone blank, ml Vaw volume of acetone used in wash, ml Vlc total volume H2O collected in impingers and silica gel, grams Vm volume of gas sampled through dry gas meter, ft3 Vm(std)volume of gas measured by the dry gas meter, corrected to standard conditions, dscf Vma stack gas volume sampled, acf Vn volume collected at stack conditions through nozzle, acf Vs average stack gas velocity, feet per second Vwc(std)volume of water vapor condensed, corrected to standard conditions, scf Vwi(std)volume of water vapor in gas sampled from impingers, scf Vwsg(std)volume of water vapor in gas sampled from silica gel, scf W watt Wa weight of residue in acetone wash, mg Wimp total weight of impingers, grams Wsg total weight of silica gel, grams Y dry gas meter calibration factor, dimensionless 69 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 AAS atomic absorption spectroscopy ACDP air contaminant discharge permit ACE analyzer calibration error, percent of span AD absolute difference ADL above detection limit AETB Air Emissions Testing Body AS applicable standard (emission limit) ASTM American Society For Testing And Materials BACT best achievable control technology BDL below detection limit BHP brake horsepower BIF boiler and industrial furnace BLS black liquor solids CC confidence coefficient CD calibration drift CE calibration error CEM continuous emissions monitor CEMS continuous emissions monitoring system CERMS continuous emissions rate monitoring system CET calibration error test CFR Code of Federal Regulations CGA cylinder gas audit CHNOS elemental analysis for determination of C, H, N, O, and S content in fuels CNCG concentrated non-condensable gas CO catalytic oxidizer COC chain of custody COMS continuous opacity monitoring system CPM condensable particulate matter CPMS continuous parameter monitoring system CT combustion turbine CTM conditional test method CTO catalytic thermal oxidizer CVAAS cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy De equivalent diameter DE destruction efficiency Dioxins polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) DLL detection level limited DNCG dilute non-condensable gas ECD electron capture detector EIT Engineer In Training ELCD electrolytic conductivity detector (hall detector) EMPC estimated maximum possible concentration EPA US Environmental Protection Agency EPRI Electric Power Research Institute ES emission standard (applicable limit) ESP electrostatic precipitator EU emission unit FCCU fluid catalytic cracking unit FGD flue gas desulfurization FI flame ionization FIA flame ionization analyzer FID flame ionization detector FPD flame photometric detector FPM filterable particulate matter ABBREVIATIONS 70 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 ABBREVIATIONS FTIR Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy FTPB field train proof blank FTRB field train recovery blank Furans polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) GC gas chromatography GC/MS gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy GFAAS graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy GFC gas filter correlation GHG greenhouse gas HAP hazardous air pollutant HC hydrocarbons HHV higher heating value HPLC high performance liquid chromatography HRGC/HRMS high-resolution gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectroscopy HRSG heat recovery steam generator IC ion chromatography ICAP inductively-coupled argon plasma emission spectroscopy ICPCR ion chromatography with a post-column reactor ICP-MS inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy IR infrared radiation ISO International Standards Organization kW kilowatts LFG landfill gas LHV lower heating value LPG liquified petroleum gas MACT maximum achievable control technology MDI methylene diphenyl diisocyanate MDL method detection limit MNOC maximum normal operating conditions MRL method reporting limit MS mass spectrometry NA not applicable or not available NCASI National Council For Air And Steam Improvement NCG non-condensable gases ND not detected NDIR non-dispersive infrared NESHAP National Emissions Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants NG natural gas NIOSH National Institute For Occupational Safety And Health NIST National Institute Of Standards And Technology NMC non-methane cutter NMOC non-methane organic compounds NMVOC non-methane volatile organic compounds NPD nitrogen phosphorus detector NSPS New Source Performance Standards OSHA Occupational Safety And Health Administration PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PCB polychlorinated biphenyl compounds PCWP plywood and composite wood products PE Professional Engineer PFAS per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) PI photoionization PID photoionization detector PM particulate matter 71 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 ABBREVIATIONS PM10 particulate matter less than 10 microns in aerodynamic diameter PM2.5 particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter POM polycyclic organic matter PS performance specification PSD particle size distribution PSEL plant site emission limits PST performance specification test PTE permanent total enclosure PTM performance test method QA/QC quality assurance and quality control QI Qualified Individual QSTI Qualified Source Testing Individual RA relative accuracy RAA relative accuracy audit RACT reasonably available control technology RATA relative accuracy test audit RCTO rotary concentrator thermal oxidizer RICE stationary reciprocating internal combustion engine RM reference method RTO regenerative thermal oxidizer SAM sulfuric acid mist SCD sulfur chemiluminescent detector SCR selective catalytic reduction system SD standard deviation Semi-VOST semi-volatile organic compounds sample train SRM standard reference material TAP toxic air pollutant TBD to be determined TCA thermal conductivity analyzer TCD thermal conductivity detector TGNENMOC total gaseous non-ethane non-methane organic compounds TGNMOC total gaseous non-methane organic compounds TGOC total gaseous organic compounds THC total hydrocarbons TIC tentatively identified compound TO thermal oxidizer TO toxic organic (as in EPA Method TO-15) TPM total particulate matter TSP total suspended particulate matter TTE temporary total enclosure ULSD ultra-low sulfur diesel UV ultraviolet radiation range VE visible emissions VOC volatile organic compounds VOST volatile organic sample train WC water column WWTP waste water treatment plant 72 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Ag silver Se selenium As arsenic SO2 sulfur dioxide Ba barium SO3 sulfur trioxide Be beryllium SOx sulfur oxides C carbon TCDD tetrachlorodibenzodioxin Cd cadmium TCDF tetrachlorodibenzofuran CdS cadmium sulfide TGOC total gaseous organic concentration CH2O formaldehyde THC total hydrocarbons CH3CHO acetaldehyde Tl thallium CH3OH methanol TRS total reduced sulfur compounds CH4 methane Zn zinc C2H4O ethylene oxide C2H6 ethane C3H4O acrolein C3H6O propionaldehyde C3H8 propane C6H5OH phenol Cl2 chlorine ClO2 chlorine dioxide CO carbon monoxide Co cobalt CO2 carbon dioxide Cr chromium Cu copper EtO ethylene oxide EtOH ethyl alcohol (ethanol) H2 hydrogen H2O water H2O2 hydrogen peroxide H2S hydrogen sulfide H2SO4 sulfuric acid HCl hydrogen chloride Hg mercury IPA isopropyl alcohol MDI methylene diphenyl diisocyanate MeCl2 methylene chloride MEK methyl ethyl ketone MeOH methanol Mn manganese N2 nitrogen NH3 ammonia Ni nickel NO nitric oxide NO2 nitrogen dioxide NOx nitrogen oxides O2 oxygen P phosphorus Pb lead PCDD polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins PCDF polychlorinated dibenzofurans Sb antimony CHEMICAL NOMENCLATURE 73 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, NV 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Appendix D.2 Calibration Records 74 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average:Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 1.0650 1.0997 1.0944 1.0864 1.113379 1.182855 1.22072 .1.034942 1.114215 1.181629 1.111706 1.192022 1.181629 1.184072 1.212862 1.275953 1.234611 1.319143 1.364051 1.166529 1.214905 1.276191 1.204602 1.252695 1.275601 W. W. CLYDE 1.154083 1.235252 1.294891 Duchesne, Utah 1.118266 1.142197 1.202162 8/27/2024 1.156355 1.200388 1.183158 1.157773 1.200952 1.202383 es 1.228919 1.237913 1.278191 c-5000 1.22951 1.309937 1.367071 1.196015 1.184258 1.24319 1.230689 1.258344 1.317587 Alt-009 Post Meter Cal.yqa #REF!1.314005 1.328564 1.29966 1.378957 1.395033 1.388251 1.347965 1.413525 1.438144 1.068357 1.148097 1.188051 1.029285 1.044931 1.10652 1.349895 1.365759 1.355823 1.366151 1.382957 1.373721 1.270196 1.28251 1.265575 1.110684 1.189789 1.267661 1.031244 1.111202 Average 1.191528 1.236812 1.272825 Alt-009 Sq Rt. Delta H % Difference, Calibration must be within 5% of orginal Y Factor 75 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 76 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 77 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 78 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 79 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 80 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 81 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 82 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 83 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 84 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. CLYDE Date: 8/27/2024 DILLMAN 500 Calibrated By: ROS2 D1 (in) D2 (in) D3 (in)DD Dn Average Run # 1 a 0.291 0.291 0.291 0.000 0.291 Run # 2 a 0.291 0.291 0.291 0.000 0.291 Run # 3 a 0.291 0.291 0.291 0.000 0.291 where: D 1,2,3 = Nozzle diameter measured on a different diameter. - Inches Tolerance = ± 0.001 inches (± 0.25 mm) DD = Maximum difference in any two measurements. - Inches Tolerance = ± 0.004 inches (± 0.1 mm) Dn =Average of D1, 2, 3. Nozzle Identification Number Nozzle Calibration Company: Sampling Location: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC. 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 801-794-2950 85 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, NV 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report Appendix D.3 Accreditation Information/Certifications 86 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 Accredited Air Emission Testing Body A2LA has accredited MONTROSE AIR QUALITY SERVICES In recognition of the successful completion of the joint A2LA and Stack Testing Accreditation Council (STAC) evaluation process, this laboratory is accredited to perform testing activities in compliance with ASTM D7036:2004 - Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies. Presented this 27th day of February 2024. _______________________ Vice President, Accreditation Services For the Accreditation Council Certificate Number 3925.01 Valid to February 28, 2026 This accreditation program is not included under the A2LA ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement. American Association for Laboratory Accreditation 87 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 88 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723 W. W. Clyde & Company, Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-Flow HMA Plant, Near Duchesne, NV 2024 PM and VEs Compliance Source Test Report This is the Last Page of This Document If you have any questions, please contact one of the following individuals by email or phone. Name: Beckie Hawkins Title: District Manager Region: USA - Stack - Great Plains - Operations Email: BeHawkins@montrose-env.com Phone: 801-794-2950 Name: Austin Tramell Title: Field Technician Region: USA - Stack - Great Plains - Operations Email: AuTramell@montrose-env.com Phone: 801-794-2950 89 of 89 GP081AS-044254-RT-1723