Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRC-2008-002581 - 0901a06880aee4f6J DENIS MINES August 8, 2008 VIA PDF AND FEDEX Mr. Dane L. Finerfrock Executive Secretary Utah Fladiation Control Board State of Utah Department of EnvironmentalQuality 168 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4850 I "J)l Denison Mines (USA) Corp. 1050 17th Street, Suite 950 Denver, CO 80265 USA Tel : 303 62&7798 Fax : 303 389*4125 www.denisonmines.com fa r..,..,il:,,,f,i, ..r-.. Ir,l.r!i i:,r r:r:liij C1I -,. ,, a --t--^l,4r._ ,r.. : ..,Ult!iUi Dear Mr. Finerfrock: Re: October 12,2OO7 Draft Contingency Plan for Denison Mines (USA) Corporation, as Required Under Part 1.H.16 of State of Utah GWDP No. UGW370004: Conditional Approval As requested, please find enclosed a draft-revised Contingency Plan for your review. The draft includes revisions to incorporate the recent changes to the White Mesa Mill's Groundwater Discharge Permit relating to Cell 44, as well as some minor clean-up changes resulting from other changes to the Permit. lf you have any questions or require any further information, ptJas" contact the undersigned. Yours very truly, Ron F. Hochstein Harold R. Roberts Steven D. Landau David E. Turk White Mesa Mill - Stand? Ooeratins Procedures DU/08 Revision: DUSA-I Book # l9-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Page I of 13 WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL CONTINGENCY PLAN As Required Un{6r Part I.H.165 State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No.UGW370N42oaa l? struzoog Prepared by: Denison Mines (USA) Corp. 1050 17th Street, Suite 950 e,'#c- $!**' Denver White Mesa Mill - Stand? Oneratino Procedures DU/08 Revision: DUSA-I Book# 19-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Paee 2 ol13 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PURPOSE 3. GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION 3.1. Notification 3.2. Continuation of Accelerated Monitoring 3.3. Submission of Plan and Timetable 3.4. Groundwater Remediation Plan 4. MILL DISCHARGB VIOLATIONS - INCLT]DING UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR RELEASE OF PROHIBITED CONTAMINANTS TO THE TAILING CELLS 4.1. Notifications 4.2. Field Activities 4.3. Request for Approvals and/or Waivers 5. DMT VIOLATIONS 5.1. Tailings Cell Wastewater Pool Elevation Above the Maximum Elevations 5.2. Excess Head in Tailings Cells 2 and 3 Slimes Drain Systems 5.3. Excess Cell4A Leak Detection Fluid Head or Daily Leak Rate $.$5.4. Excess Elevation For Tailings Solids $45.5. Roberts Pond Wastewater Elevation $55.6. Feedstock Storage Area #5.7. Mill Site Chemical Reagent Storage $.45.8. Failure to Construct as per Approval $&5.9. Failure to Comply with Stormwater Management and Spill Control Requirements Page No. 3t. 2. aJ 4 4 4 5 6 6 6 7 7 8 2 98 _1_0e 18e 110 L2+ v+ Book# 19-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL CONTINGENCY PLAN State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 INTRODUCTION The State of Utah has granted Ground Water Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (the "GWDP") for Denison Mines (USA) Corp.'s ("Denison's") White Mesa Uranium Mill (the "Mill"). The GWDP specifies the construction, operation, and monitoring requirements for all facilities at the Mill that have a potential to discharge pollutants directly or indirectly into groundwater. n- fiu,lrly)N1 A;{*2. PURPOSE This Contingency Plan (the "Plan") provides a detailed list of actions Denison will take to ^..-l EAI-regain compliance with GWDP limitsrand Discharge Minimization Technology ("DMT") ANC !)' requirements defined in Parts LC and I.D of the GWDP. The timely execution of contingency and corrective actions outlined in this Plan will provide Denison with the basis to exercise the Affirmative Action Defense provision in Part I.G.3.c) of the GWDP and thereby avoid noncompliance status and potential enforcement actionl. The contingency actions required to regain compliance with GWDP limitsranfDMT, axrl BAT requirements defined in Parts I.C and I.D of the GWDP are described below. 3. GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION Since there are many different possible scenarios that could potentially give rise to groundwater contamination, and since the development and implementation of a remediation program will normally be specific to each particular scenario, this Plan does not outline a definitive remediation program. Rather, this Plan describes the steps that will be followed by Denison in the event Denison is found to be out of compliance with respect to any constituent in any monitoring well, pursuant to Part LG.2 of the GWDP. When the concentration of any parameter in a compliance monitoring well is out of compliance, Denison will, subject to specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as I Part I.G.3.c) of the GWDP provides that, in the event a compliance action is initiated against Denison for violation of permit conditions relating to best available technology or DMT, Denison may affirmatively defend against that action by demonstratingthat it has made appropriate notifications, that the failure was not intentional or caused by Denison's negligence, that Denison has taken adequate measures to meet permit conditions in a timely manner or has submitted an adequate plan and schedule for meeting permit conditions, and that the provisions ofUCA l9-5-107 have not been violated. N,, : .tl*\> *..1*',, fI'r\t '\.u' l- j (h/ White Mesa Mill- Standil Oneratins Procedures D!/08 Revision: DUSA-l Book# l9-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Page4ofl3 set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: 3.1. Notification Denison will notify the Executive Secretary of the out of compliance status within 24 hours after detection of that status followed by a written notice within 5 days after detection, as required under Part I.G.4.a) of the GWDP. 3.2. Continuation of Accelerated Monitoring Denison will continue accelerated sampling for the parameter in thaAompliance monitoring well pursuant to Part I.G.1 of the GWDP, unless the Executive Secretary determines that other periodic sampling is appropriate, until the facility is brought into compliance, as required under Part I.G.4.b) of the GWDP.@Peff r lir, ffi_t/ If the accelerated monitoring demonstrates that the Mill is no longe$p!:tS1ffi ' slefus ( rt{ ameter, with respect to a parameter in a well, then, with thervritten appro Secretary, Denison will cease accelerated monitofpg fort#$kuSecretary, Denison will cease accelerated r thervritten aoorovalbf the Executive itori n s for +n3'ILumeter- and*sfurttrc taN{At< rJn,4.1v? li, .j4a+ ,4,,p* 6- 3.3. Submission of Plan and Timetable If the accelerated monitoring confirms that the Mill isNrt of compliance with respect to a parameter in a well, then, within 30 days of such confirmation, Denison will prepare and submit to the Executive Secretary a plan and a time schedule for assessment of the sources, extent and potential dispersion of the contamination, and an evaluation of r)a i- potential remedial action to restore and maintain ground water quality to ensure that ) gr ul\l permit limits will not be exceeded at the compliance monitoring point and that DMT will be reestablished, as required undpr part [.G.4.c) of the GWDP. This plan willrcrmaltp- includel l>t 'ri NoL io,:h-/ rt." a) The requirement for Denison to prepare a detailed and comprehensive operational history of the facility and surrounding areas which explores all activities that may have contributed to the contamination; b) A requirement for Denison to complete an evaluation, which may include geochemical and hydrogeological analyses, to determine whether or not the contamination was caused by Mill activities or was caused by natural forces or offsite activities; c) If it is concluded that the contamination is the result of current or past activities at the Mill, Denison will prepare a Characterization Report, which characterizes the physical, chemical, and radiological extent of the ground water r$'\) a ,4" gl 1.6., *7 White Mesa Mill - Stand? Ooeratins Procedures D!/08 Revision: DUSA-I Book# 19-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Page 5 o:[ 13 d) contamination. This willtormatlyinclude a description of any additional wells to be used or installed to characterize the plume and the hydrogeologic characteristics of the affected zone, the analytical parameters to be obtained, the samples of ground water to be taken, and any other means to measure and characterize the affected ground water and contamination zone; and If it is concluded that the contamination is the result of current or past activities at the Mill, Denison will evaluate potential remedial actions, including actions to restore and maintain groundwater quality to ensure that permit limits will not ig exceeded at the compliance monitoring point and thatDMTffiill be reestablished, as well as actions that merely allow natural attenuation to operate and actions that involve applying for Alternate Concentration Limiis (" remediation is required, Denison will prepare and Secreiary a Ground Water Remediation Plan, as described in Section3.4below.)/ 4n: 3.4. Groundwater Remediation Plan S.tblif ,4.Awnuxl If the Executive Secretary determines that ground water remediation is needed, Denison will submit a Ground Water Remediation Plan to the Executive Secretary within the time frame requested by the Executive SecretaryT, The Gropqd lVater Remediation Plan will nsrma*tyincludel blt is fit 1;q;1J* 7e Tulo*)ry\.-k) VwN 5S fur ui,",, Qrrd*^f a) A description and schedule of how Denison will implement a corrective action program that prevents contaminants from exceeding the ground water protection lprels o4lCl-s at the compliance monitoring point(s) or other locations approved place, or by other means as approved by the Executive Secretary; b) A description of the remediation monitoring program to demonstrate the effectiveness ofthe plan; and c) Descriptions of how conective action will apply to each source of the pollution. Denison will implement the Ground Water Remediation Plan in accordance with a schedule to be submitted by Denison und u 4. MILL DISCHARGE VIOLATIONS - INCLUDING UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR RELEASE OF PROHIBITED CONTAMINANTS TO THE TAILING CELLS PartLC.Z. of the GWDP provides that only lle.(Z) by-product material authorized by the Mill's State of Utah Radioactive Materials License No. UT-2300478 (the "Radioactive Materials License") shall be discharged to or disposed of in the Mill's tailings cells. z White Mesa Mill - Standil Oneratins Procedures DU/08 Revision: DUSA-l Book# 19-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Page 6 o:[_!3 Part t.C.3 of the GWDP provides that discharge of other compounds into the Mill's tailings cells, such as paints, used oil, antifreeze, pesticides, or any other contaminant not defined as 11e.(2) material is prohibited. In the event of any unauthorized disposal of contaminants or wastes (the "Unauthorized Materials") to the Mill's tailings cells, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: 4.1. Notifications a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; and b) Denison will provide verbal hours of discovery followed discovery. 4.2. Field Activities notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 by a written notification within five days of ( $u ..( ?ril'' a) Upon discovery, Mill personnel will immediately cease placement of Unauthorized Materials into the Mill's tailings cells; b) To the extent reasonably practicable and in a manner that can be accomplished safely, Mill personnel will attempt to segregate the Unauthorized Materials from other tailings materials and mark or record the location of the Unauthorized Materials in the tailings cells. If it is not reasonably practicable to safely segregate the Unauthorized Material from other tailings materials, Mill personnel will nevertheless mark or record the location of the Unauthorized Materials in the tailings cells; c) To the extent reasonably practicable and in a manner that can be accomplished safely, Mill personnel will attempt to remove the Unauthorized Material from the tailings cells; and d) Denison will dispose of the Unauthorized Material under applicable State and rzgu/n'$o u5 4.3. Request for Approvals and/or Waivers If it is not reasonably practicable to safely remove the Unauthorized Materials from the tailings cells, then Denison will: Federal regulations.6rt'e 4,, a White Mesa Mill - Standil Onerat'ins Procedures Du/08 Revision: DUSA-I Book# l9-Groundwater Discharse Permit Plans and Page 7 pI_I3 -fi (d*'t a) b) Submit a written ,"r#r"Tn*il*ecutive Secretary analyzingthe health, safety and environmental impacts, if any, associated with the permanent disposal of the Unauthorized Material in the Mill's tailings cells; Apply to the Executive ,""i{*#;,$y *"noments that may be required to the GWDP and the Radioactive Materials License to properly accommodate the permanent disposal of the Unauthorized Material in the Mill's tailings cells in a manner that is protective of health, safety and the environment; and 0ft >blo1 x(N c? ?d*' c) Make all applications required under the United States Commis sion' s ("NRC' s") " Non- 1le-(2)Disposal Policyli ncludin g obtainin g approval of the Department of Energy as the long term custodian of the Mill's tailings, in order to obtain approval to permanently dispose of the Unauthorized Material in the Mill's tailings cells. 5. DMT VIOLATIONS 5.1. Tailings Cell Wastewater Pool Elevation Above the Maximum Elevations Part I.D.2 and Part I.D.6.d) of the GWDP provides that authorized operation and maximum disposal capacity in each of the existing tailings cells shall not exceed the levels authorized by the Radioactive Materials License and that under no circumstances shall the freeboard be less than three feet, as measured from the top of the flexible membrane liner ("FML"). In the event that tailings cell wastewater pool elevation in any tailings cell exceeds the maximum elevations mandated by Part I.D.2 and Part I.D.6.d) of the GWDP, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following processl ( a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary wrthin24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery; ; t'\ .t\ or' c) Upon discovery, Mill personnel will cease to discharge any further tailings to the o\hpu -"u .. J subject tailings cell, until such time as adequate freeboard capacity exists in the )'Su,)**{n' subject tailings cell for the disposal of the tailings; t\ .,r V' 0t , o$' -w1,rd d) To the extent reasonably practicable, without causing a violation of the freeboard !o'td" [mit in any other tailings cell, Mill personnel will promptly pump fluids from the subject tailings cell to another tailings cell until such time as the freeboard limit for the subject tailings cell is in compliance. If there is no room available in 4 White MesaMill- Stand? Ooeratins Procedures DU/08 Revision: DUSA-l Book# l9-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Page 8 ol_13 another tailings cell, without violating the freeboard limit of such other cell, then, as soon as reasonably practicable, Mill personnel will cease to discharge any further tailings to any tailings cell until such time as adequate freeboard capacity exists in all tailings cells; e) If it is not reasonably practicable to pump sufficient solutions from the subject tailings cell to another tailings cell, then the solution levels in the subject tailings cell will be reduced through natural evaporation; and 0 Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the exceedance and will implement new procedures or change elisting ppocedures to minimize the chance of a recurrence. ""; ;,;;;i'"' li,;1,;;;"" 2;:';:;"";)::i:iu wr 4,, p .r1;i.$'tl 5.2. Excess Head in Tailings Cells 2.3,and34A Slimes Drain Systems * y.|[\-x ri* Part I.D.3.b)1) of the GWDP provides that Denison shall at all times maintain the average wastewater head in the slimes drain access pipe in Cell 2 to be as low as reasonably achievable, in accor(ance with a DMT Monitoring Plan approved by the Executive Sec pursuant t6Part I.H.13 of the GWDP, and that for Cell 3, this requirement shall apply only after initiation of de-watering operations. Similarl)r. Part I.D.6.c) of the GWDP provides that after Denison initiates pumping conditions in the slimes drain layer I4Azrauoqv(cL tr' ?r'nl t|r4^ ?.t5 laver. in a manner equivalent to the requirements found in Part I.D.3.b). Z\ au"l ^ At)u'6li YcAn c'z' In the event that the average wastewater head in the slimes drain access pipe for Cell 2 or, after initiation of de-watering activities, Cell 3 or initiation of pumping conditions in the slimes drain layer in Cell4,A, exceeds the levels specified in the DMT Monitoring Plan, 4 Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Mill personnel will promptly pump the excess fluid into an active tailings cell, or other appropriate containment or evaporation facility approved by the Executive Secretary; c) If the exceedance is the result of equipment failure, Mill personnel will attempt to repair or replace the equipment; d) If the cause of the exceedance is not rectified within 24 hours, Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within the ensuing 24 hours followed by a written notification within five days; and / 1tr 4:f"),. \,t ; (( ,f av\ \'s a {*1;j"{i White Mesa Mill- Standt! Oneratins Procedures IU/08 Revision:DUSA-l Book# 19-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Paee 9 orl-13 e) If not due to an identified equipment failure, Denison will perform a root cause ,- A*rrliryranalysis of the exceedance and will implement new procedures or change. J pst'r - r ';:. exisiing procedures to minimize the chance of a r".uo"r... X frY +'Ar; i*i, 5.3. Excess Cell4,A' l,eak Detection Svstem Fluid Head or Daily Leak Rate Part I.D.6.a) provides that the fluid head in the Leak Detection System ("LDS") for Cell 44, shall not exceed I foot above the lowest point in the lower membrane liner. and Part I.D.6.b) of the GWDP provides that the maximum allowable daily leak rate measur.ed in the LDS for Cell 4A shall not exceed 24.160 gallons/day. a o a t 1,)l*t$ fKo}',u''exceeds 24.160 gallons/day. Denison will. subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice. order. remediation plan or the equivalent. implement the following process:x a) Upon discovery. the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately: b) Mill personnel will promptly pump the excess fluid into an active tailings cell. or other appropriate containment or evaporation facility approved by the Executive Secretary. until such time as the cause of exceedance is rectified or until such time as otherwise directed by the Executive Secretary: uL,k \ ..1_r-L,g i5 c) If the exceedance is the result of equipment failure. Mill personnel will attempt to r"puir o. r"ptuo iii" "q;i;m"ni:- ffi^rr d\ If the cause of the exceedance is not rectified withir&-heurs. Denison will (5n'-, '' ' ,f ,:,;- r' ification to the E Za lzou.-y, e) If not due to an identified equignent failure. Denison will perform a root cause analysis ofthe exceedance and exi*tip.I procedures t of a _.€lEiiEF S.*5.4. Excess Elevation For Tailings Solids Part I.D.3,$q)D of the GWDP provides that upon closure of any tailings cell, Denison shall ensure that the maximum elevation of the tailings waste solids does not exceed the top of the FML. In the event that, upon closure of any tailings cell, the maximum elevation of the tailings waste solids exceeds the top of the FML, Denison will, subject to any specific a White Mesa Mill - Standat! Ooeratine hocedures DU/08 Revision: DUSA-l Book# 19-Groundwater Discharee Permit Plans and Paee l0O[_!3 requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery; To the extent reasonably practicable, without causing a violation of the freeboard limit in any other tailings cell, Mill personnel will promptly remove tailings solids from the subject tailings cell to another tailings cell, or other location approved by the Executive Secretary, until such time as the maximum elevation of the tailings waste solids in the subject tailings cell does not exceed the top of the FML; and Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the exceedance and will implement new procedures or change existing procedures to minimize the chance of a recurrence. $.45.5. Roberts Pond Wastewater Elevation Part I.D.3.+e) of the GWDP provides that the Permittee shall operate Roberts Pond so as to provide a minimum 2-foot freeboard at all times and that under no circumstances shall the water level in Roberts Pond exceed an elevation of 5,624 feet above mean sea level. In the event that the wastewater elevation exceeds this maximum level, Denison shall remove the excess wastewater and place it into containment in Tailings Cell I within 72 hours of discovery, as specified in Part I.D.3.+q) of the GWDP. In the event that, Denison fails ,fl*;X;,i, hu'S,r[, -f subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a)Upondiscovery,theMillManagerorRSowillbenotifiedimmediately;and b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification and proposed corrective actions within five days of discovery. 555.6. Feedstock Storage Area Part LD.3.dfl and Part I.D.11 of the GWDP provides that open-air or bulk storage of all feedstock materials at the Mill facility awaiting Mill processing shall be limited to the c) d) z x k^.11 f,o'* ft/t" \\B# fr-ffi- $:) White Mesa Mill- Standil Ooeratine Procedures Df/08 Revision: DUSA-l Book# l9-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Pagellof13 eastern portion of the Mill site area described in Table 4 of the GWDP, and that storage of feedstock materials at the facility outside that area shall be performed and.main*ained inersin accordance with an approved Feedstock Manasement Plan Dursuant to Part l.H.zl of the GWDP. In the event that, storage of any feedstock at the Mill is not in compliance with the requirements specified in Part I.D.3.J0 and Part LD.l1 of the GWDP, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary wrthin24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery; c) Mill personnel will: (i) move any open-air or bulk stored feedstock materials to the portion of the Mill site area described in Table 4 of the GWDP; ensure that any feedstock materials that are stored outside of the area described in Table 4 of the GWDP are stored and maintained in elos€4 water tight eentainer'^ccordance with the approved Feedstock Management Plan; and(iii) to the extent that any such containers are observed to be leaking, such leaking containers will be placed into watertight over-pack containers q otherwise dealt with in accordance with the approved Feedstock Management Plan, and any impacted soils will be removed and will be deposited into the Mill's active tailings cell; and d) Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the non-compliant activity and will implement new procedures or change existing procedures to minimize the chance of a recurrence. 5.*5.7. Mill Site Chemical Reagent Storage Part I.D.3.-eg) of the GWDP provides that for all chemical reagents stored at existing storage facilities, Denison shall provide secondary containment to capture and contain all volumes of reagent(s) that might be released at any individual storage area, and that for any new construction of reagent storage facilities, the secondary containment and control shall prevent any contact of the spilled reagent with the ground surface. &'lr'/- In the event that Denison.does-neeprovide the required secondary containment required under Part I.dp.3.,+g) of the GWDP, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements (ii) ^ o,$r{ ldtr White MesaMill-StandU Oneratins Procedures IU/08 Revision: DUSA-I Book# 19-Groundwater Discharee Permit Plans and Procedures Page 12 o:Ll3 of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery; and c) Denison will promptly remediate any spilled re-agent resulting from the failure to provide the required secondary containment under Part I.dp.3.eg) of the GWDP, by removal of the contaminated soil and disposal in the active lailings cell. . ,.k ,.br+ i glela--1' u-t-A rtnl.(y{t* ('"r-(f' 1>du'N1 5*5.8. Failureio Construct as per Ap-proval ('.4 Att b.ou , korJ -P Part I.D.4 of the GWDP provides that any construction, modification, or operation of new waste or wastewater disposal, treatment, or storage facilities shall require submittal of engineering design plans and specifications, and prior Executive Secretary review and approval, and that a Construction Permit may be issued. In the event that, any new waste or wastewater disposal, treatment, or storage facilities are constructed at the Mill facility without obtaining prior Executive Secretary review and approval, or any such facilities are not constructed in accordance with the provisions of any applicable Construction Permit, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; and b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification and proposed corrective actions within five days of discovery. 5*5.9. Failure to Comply with Stormwater Management and Splll Control Requirements Part I.D.8]Q of the GWDP provides that Denison will manage all contact and non-contact stormwater and control contaminant spills at the Mill facility in accordance with an approved. Sto.rmwater Best Management Practices Plan, pursuant to Part I.H.176 of the GWDP. X In the event that any contact or non-contact stormwater or contaminant spills are not managed in accordance with the Mill's approved Stormwater Best Management Practices Plan, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set lq White Mesa Mill - Stand! Operatine Procedures DI/08 Revision: DUSA-I Book# 19-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Paee 13 of l3 forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification and proposed corrective actions within five days of discoveryi and To the extent still practicable at the time of discovery, Denison will manage any such contaminant spill in accordance with the Mill's approved Stormwater Best Management Practices Plan. To the extent it is no longer practicable to so manage any such spill, Denison will agree with the Executive Secretary on appropriate clean up and other measures. b) c) a White M€sa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Book# l9-Groundwater Discharge Pomit Plans and Procedures Dotc:9/10 r.eviSofe-r Page I of14 I WHITh MESA TTRAMUM MILL I ICONTINGENCY PLAI\ I lAs Contemplated by Part LG.4(d) I Stat€ of Utah fr**a*"rcr Disoharge PcrmitNo.UGW370004 I Prepared by: Denison Mines (USA) Corp. 1050 lTth SheeL Suite 950 DenverCO 80265 *f 4,b, White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Book# 19-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Date: JJ.rll.l nevisio$4,-: Page2 of 14 Deletedr 9/10I TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. PURPOSE 3. GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION3.1. Notification3.2. Continuation of Accelerated Monitoring3.3. Submission of Plan and Timetable3.4. Groundwater Remediation Plan 4. MILL DISCHARGE VIOLATIONS - INCLUDING UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR RELEASE OF PROHIBITED CONTAMINAIITS TO THE TAILINGCELLS4.1. Notifications4.2. Field Activities4.3. Request for Approvals and/or Waivers 5. DMT VIOLATIONS5.1. Tailings Cell Wastewater Pool Elevation Above the Maximum Elevations5.2. Excess Head in Tailings Cells 2 and 3 Slimes Drain Systems5.3. Excess Cell4,A, Leak Detection Fluid Head or Daily Leak Rate5.4. Excess New Decontamination Pad Leak Detection Fluid Head5.5. Excess Elevation For Tailings Solids5.6. Roberts Pond Wastewater Elevation5.7. Feedstock Storage Area5.8. Mill Site Chemical Reagent Storage5.9. Failure to Constuct as per Approval 5.10. Failure to Comply with Stormwater Management and Spill Control Requirements Page No. J 3 4 4 4 5 6 6 6 8 9 9 l0lltl 12 t3 l3 7 7 White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Book# l9-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Date: J lLLl Reuirlgr}4,;r-, - Page 3 of 14 Deletedr 9/10 Deletedr groundwater Detetedr and WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL CONTINGENCY PLATI State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 1. INTRODUCTION The State of Utah has granted Ground Water Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (the "GWDP") for Denison Mines (USA) Corp.'s ("Denison's') White Mesa Uranium Mill (the "Mill'). The GWDP specifies the requirements for all facilities at the Mi operation, and monitoring havg a potential to discharge pollutants directly or indirectly into Julv I approved Mav 2. 2008.) apf inol PURPOSE This Contingency Plan (the "Plan") provides a detailed list of actions Denison will take regain compliance with GWDP limits,jbs Pischarge Minimi ("DMT") and the Best Available Technology Plan (."defined in Parts I.C, I.D, and I$.4 o{$_e GWDP. Thg time_fy _e1e_c_ut1og_of_cg{tqqg.er-rgy and corrggtive , actions outlined in this Plan will provide Denison with the basis to exercise the Affirmative Action Defense provision in Part I.G.3.c) of the GWDP and thereby avoid noncompliance status and potential enforcement actionl. The contingency actions required to regain compliance with GWDP limits and DMT 3!d BAT requirements defined in Parts I.C, I.D, and I$.4 of the GW-Df are desggbe{ be-lo1v, 3. GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION Since there are many different possible scenarios that could potentially give rise to groundwater contamination, and since the development and implementation of a remediation program will normally be specific to each particular scenario, this Plan does not outline a definitive remediation program. Rather, this Plan describes the steps that will be followed by Denison in the event Denison is found to be out of compliance with respect to any constituent in any monitoring well, pursuant to Part I.G.2 of the GWDP. ' Part LG.3.c; of the GWDP provides that, in the event a compliance action is initiated against Denison for violation of permit conditions relating to best available technology or DMT, Denison may affirmatively defend against that action by demonstrating that it has made appropriate notifications, that the failure was not intentional or caused by Denison's negligence, that Denison has taken adequate measures to meet permit conditions in a timely manner or has submitted an adequate plan and schedule for meeting permit conditions, and that the provisions ofUCA l9-5-107 have not been violated. White Mesa Mill- Standard Operating Procedures Book# 19-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Date:J t)rl I Revisiorle-r Deletedr 9/lo Detetedl nomally Page 4 of 14 When the concentration of any parameter in a compliance monitoring well is out of compliance, Denison will, subject to specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: Notification Denison will notify the Executive Secretary of the out of compliance status within 24 hours after detection of that status followed by a written notice within 5 days after detection, as required under Part LG.4.a) of the GWDP. Continuation of Accelerated Monitorins Denison will continue accelerated sampling for the parameter in that particular compliance monitoring well pursuant to Part LG.1 of the GWDP, unless the Executive Secretary determines that other periodic sampling is appropriate, until the facility is brought into compliance, as required under Part I.G.4.b) of the GWDP. lgomPliance w-ith the Executive Secretary, Denison will cease accelerated monitoring for&qlpirameiier, iiay,tlL.z' continue routing monitoring ftrr that pa.rameter. 3.3.Submission of Plan and Timetable If the accelerated monitoring confirms that the Mill is out of compliance with respect to a parameter in a well, then, within 30 days of such confirmation, Denison will prepare and submit to the Executive Secretary a plan and a time schedule for assessment of the sources, extent and potential dispersion of the contamination, and an evaluation of potential remedial action to restore and maintain ground water quality to ensure that permit limits will not be exceeded at the compliance monitoring point and that DMT qfl- BAI will be reestablished, as required under part I.G,4.c) of the GWDP. This plan will jnc lude-bUL,b nslUlu(sd_lq : .,,' The requirement for Denison to prepare a detailed and comprehensive operational history of the facility and surrounding areas which explores all activities that may have contributed to the contamination; A requirement for Denison to complete an evaluation, which may include geochemical and hydrogeological analyses, to determine whether or not the contamination was caused by Mill activities or was caused by natural forces or offsite activities; If the accelerated monitorin g demonstrates jhat the IEq, te t_u; respect to a parameter in a well, then, witK,written approval a) b) Deleted: Mill is no longer out of Deleted: the Deleted: of Deteted: the Del€tedr no further steps will be followed by Denison with respecdsuch parameter. White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Book # 19 - Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Date: l0r't t n"ririo,]e-:Deleted: 9i lo @ndl-h*'e Det€tedr io the Page 5 of 14 c) If it is concluded that the contamination is the result of current or past activities at the Mill, Denison will prepare a Characterization Report, which characterizes the physical, chemical, and radiological extent of the ground water contamination. This will jnclude_a_d_eggqptlo_n-qlqny-qd_dltlo-nal wells to be used or installed to characterizathe piume ana ttre nyAiog"olog," charactenstrcs-of tt . - affected zone, the analytical parameters to be obtained, the samples of ground water to be taken, and any other means to measure and characterize the affected ground water and contamination zone; and d) If it is concluded that the contamination is the result of current or past activities at the Mill, Denison will evaluate potential remedial actions, including actions to restore and maintain groundwater quality to ensure that permit limits wjll not be exceeded at the compliance monitoring point and that DMT and RA'f/will be reestablished, as well as actions that merely allow natural attenuation to operate and actions that involve applying for Altemate Concentration Limits ("ACLs"). ACLs require approval of the Water Ouality Board prior to becoming eff'ectivc/ If groundwater remediation is;:equired, Denison will prepare and submitJbr./ Executive Secretary appr,:vaIa Ground Water Remediation Plan, as described in Section 3.4 below. 3.4. Groundwater Remediation Plan If the Executive Secretary determines that ground water remediation is needed, Denison will submit a Ground Water Remediation Plan to the Executive Secretary within the time frame requested by the Executive Secretary. The Ground Water Remediation PIan will jlclude,hut=is not limited to: a) A description and schedule of how Denison will implement a corrective action program that prevents contaminants from exceeding the ground water protection levels or ACLs at the compliance monitoring point(s) or other locations approved by the Executive Secretary, by removing the contaminants, treating them in place, or by other means as approved by the Executive Secretary; b) A description of the remediation monitoring program to demonsEate the effectiveness ofthe plan; and c) Descriptions of how corrective action will apply to each source of the pollution. Denison will implement the Ground Water Remediation Plan in accordance with a schedule to be submitted by Denison and approved by the Executive Secretary. 4. MILL DISCHARGE VIOLATIONS - INCLUDING UNAUTHORIZED DISCIIARGE OR RELEASE OF PROHIBITED CONTAMINAI\TS TO THE TAILING CELLS White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Book # 19 - Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures P3sg; I0,]I,l ,R-eririofSa f Page 6 of 14 Deleted: 9/10 c/< Commcnt [rjt2]: The GWDP do€s not cont€mplat€ hadling non-l le.(2) w6te Comment [rrtr]: Pleas€ be morc ific. Which Comment [qrt4lr Tk G\ryDP does not conterplat! hsrdling non-l le.(2) ffit€ Partl.C.2. of the GWDP provides that only I 1e.(2) by-product material authorized by the Mill's State of Utah Radioactive Materials License No. UT-2300478 (the "Radioactive Materials License") shall be discharged to or disposed of in the Mill's tailings cells. Part LC.3 of the GWDP provides that discharge of other compounds into the Mill's tailings cells, such as paints, used oil, antifreeze, pesticides, or any other contaminant not defined as I le.(2) material is prohibited. In the event of any unauthorized disposal of contaminants or wastes (the "Unauthorized Materials") to the Mill's tailings cells, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: 4.1. Notifications a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; and b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery. 4.2. Field Activities Upon discovery, Mill personnel will immediately cease placement of Unauthorized Materials into the Mill's tailings cells; To the extent reasonably practicable and in a manner that can be accomplished safely, Mill personnel will attempt to segregate the Unauthorized Materials from other tailings materials and mark or record the location of ttre Unauthorized Materials in the tailings cells. If it is not reasonably practicable to safely segregate the Unauthorized Material from other tailings materials, Mill personnel will nevertheless mark or record the location of the Unauthorized Materials in the tailings cells; To the extent reasonably practicable and in a manner that can be accomplished safely, Mill personnel will attempt to remove the Unauthorized Material from the tailings cells; and Denison will dispose of the Unauthorized Material under applicable State and/ Federal regulations.i 4.3.[equest for AoJrrovals and/or Walverd ,/- a) b) c) d) White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Book # l9 - Croundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Date:JQrl I neuisio$e-l Deleted: 9/10 ,.,tf Comment [rjts]: We need o agree on a tfuneline for this submiual Comment [rjt6]: We need o agree on a tireline for this submittal Comment [rJt7]: Be more specific in this oiation Page 7 of 14 If it is not reasonably practicable to safely remove the Unauthorized Materials from the tailings cells, then Denison will: a) Submit a written report to the Executive Secretary arlalyztngthe health, safety and environmental impacts, if any, associated with the permanent disposal of the Unauthorized Material in the Mill's tailings cells; b) Apply to the Executive Secretary for any amendments that may be required to the GWDP and the Radioactive Materials License to properly accommodate the permanent disposal of the Unauthorized Material in the Mill's tailings cells in a manner that is protective of health, safety and the environment;_a_nd c) Make all applications req-uired under the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission's ("NRC's") Non-l 1e.(2) Disposal Policy, incJuding obtaimng approval of the Department of Energy as the long term custodian of the Mill's tailings, in order to obtain approval to permanently dispose of the Unauthorized Material in the Mill's tailings cells. 5. DMT VIOLATIONS 5.l. Tailines Cell Wastewater Pool Elevation Above the Maximum Elevations Part I.D.2 and Part I.D.6.d) of the GWDP provide that authorized operation and maximum disposal capacity in each of the existing tailings cells shall not exceed the levels authorizedby the Radioactive Materials License and that under no circumstances shall the freeboard be less than three feet, as measured from the top of the flexible membrane liner ("FML"). In the event that tailings cell wastewater pool elevation in any tailings cell exceeds the maximum elevations mandated by Part I.D.2 and Part I.D.6.d) of the GWDP, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) l.Jpon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery; c) Upon discovery, Mill personnel will cease to discharge any further tailings to the subject tailings cell, until such time as adequate freeboard capacity exists in the subject tailings cell for the disposal of ttre tailings; .r'r White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Book # l9 - Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Date:J 0l,l I Reri.iofe-: Page 8 of 14 Deleteds 9/10 [rft8]: Not contcrnplatcd in &cGWDP Comment [rrtg]: Timeline rcqutued Comm€nt [rrtl0]: Can we defim this morc clcnrp d) To the exteqt re?soilably practicable, without causing a violation of the freeboard Uqrit in any other tailings cell, Mill personlel will promptly pump fluids from the subject tailings cell to another tailings cell until such time as the fi.eeboard limit for the subject tailings cell is in compliance. If ttrere is no room available in another tailings cell, without violating the freeboard limit of such otler cell, then, as soon as reasonably practicable, Mill personnel will cease to discharge any further tailings to any tailings cell until such time as adequate freeboard capacity exists in all tailings cells; I If it is not reasonably practicable to pump sufficient solutions from the subject tailings cell to another tailings cell, then the solution levels in the subject tailings cell will be reduced through natural evaporation; and Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the exceedance and will implement new procedures or change existing procedures to minimize the chance of a recurrence. Denisou,will submit the findrnes of the root cause analysis to thg Executive Secretary., 5.2. Excess Head in Tailings Cells 2. 3 and 4.A, Slimes Drain Systems / Part LD.3.b)l) of the GWDP provides that Denison shall at all times maintain the average wastewater head in the slimes drain access pipe in Cell 2 to be [s low as reasonably achievablq !l qgcgrdance with ttre Mill'g cq{rg4lly 4ppr9ye4 P}4J llg4itoring Upl , pn4 -that for Cell 3, this requirement shall apply only after initiation of de-watering operations. Similarly, Part I.D.6.c) of the GWDP provides that after Denison initiates pumping conditions in the slimes drain layer in Cell4A, Denison will provide: l) continuous declining fluid heads in the slimes drain layer, in a manner equivalent to the requirements found in Part LD.3.b); and2) a maximum head of 1.0 feet in the tailings (as measured from the lowest point of the upper FML) in 6.4 years or less. In the event that the average wastewater head in the slimes drain access pipe for Cell 2 or, after initiation of de-watering activities, Cell3 or initiation of pumping conditions in the slimes drain layer in Cell 4.A exceeds the levels specified in the DMT Monitoring Plan, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) jUpon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; e) b) c) Mill personnel will promptly pump the excess fluid iato an;active tailings cell, or other appropriate containment or evaporation facility approved by the Executive Secretary; If tle exceedance is the result of equipment failure, Mill personnel will attempt to repair or replaoe the equipment; White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Book#19-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Date: J,.0tl I R"ulriorJe-r Page 9 of 14 lf the cause of the exceedance is not rectified within 24 hours, Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within the ensuing 24 hours followed by a written notification within five days; and If not due to an identified equipment failure, Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the exceedance and will implemant new procedures or change existing procedures to minimize the chance of a recurrence. Denison will submit the firrlirrgs of the root caore unaly.i, to the Executiue Sec.IE]I]-- 5.3. Excess Cell4A Leak Detection System Fluid Head or Daily Leak Rate part t.O.O.al provides that the fluid head in the Leak Detection System (.'LDS") for Cell 4A shall not exceed I foot above the lowest point in the lower membrane liner, and Part I.D.6.b) of the CWDP provides that the maximum allowable daily leak rate measured in the LDS for Cell44' shall not exceed 24,160 gallons/day. In the event that the fluid head in the LDS for Cell4A excceds I foot above the lowest point in the lower membrane layer or the daily leak rate measured in the Cell4A LDS exceeds 24,160 gallons/day, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as sst forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: , a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Mill personnel will promptly pump the excess fluid into an active tailings cell, or other appropriate containment or evaporation facility approved by the Executive Secretary, until such time as the cause of exceedance is rectified or until such time as otherwise directed by the Executive Secretary; c) If the exceedance is the result of equipment failure, Mill personnel will attempt to repair or replace the equipment; d) If the cause of the exceedance is not rectifiedJhe Sfllne yqQ.*ing day, Denison , will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary withinf4 hours followed by a written notification within five days; and e) If not due to an identified equipment failure, Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the exceedancq \4iF'*.".*Ce1t4B[eakT)etecfirrnSvsf€mFhridH'eadorI)ailvT.eakRatd< 5.5. Excess New Decontamination Pad Leak Detection System Fluid Head Deleted: 9/10 lrjtl3l; Rerulu in a maximum head abovc tbc LDS ransdr.Eor of2.28 fcct d) e) lomm€nt [rrt11]: Tinrclirc rcquircd C,ommGnt [rrtl2]l Bullets a) t]nough e) not idontified in dre CWDP procedures or change existing procedures to rcmediate the exceedance and to Commcnt [fi14]: Add sectiou to addrcss Ccll48. White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Book # l9 - Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Date:J0i I I R"ri.iorfe-:D€leted:9/10 FormatHr Bullets and Page 10 of 14 In order to ensure ttrat the primary containment of the New Decontamination Pad water collection system has not been compromised, and to provide an inspection capability to detect leakage from the primary containment in each of the three settling tanks, a vertical inspection portal has been installed between the primary and secondary containment of each settling tank. Section 3.1(e) of the Mill's DMT Monitoring Plan provides that the fluid head in the LDS for the New Decontamination Pad shall not exceed 0.10 feet above the concrete floor in any of ttre three standpipes. In the event that the fluid head in the standpipe for a settling tank exceeds 0. 10 feet above the concrete floor in the standpipe, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within the ensuing 24 hours followed by a written notification within five days; c) Mill personnel will promptly pump the fluid from the settling tank's LDS as well as the fluids in the settling tank into another settling tank or into an active tailings cell, or other appropriate containment or evaporation facility approved by the Executive Secretary, until such time as the cause of the exceedance is rectified or until such time as otherwise directed by the Executive Secretary; and d) Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the exceedance and, if appropriate, will implement new procedures or change existing procedures to remediate the exceedance and to minimize the chance of a recurrence. De.qiSpq will SULmit the findinss of the root cause analvsis to the Exeoutive Sbcretarv.l 5.6, Cracks or Physical Discrepancies on the New Decontamination Pad Wash Pad. + " In the event that cracks or other physical discreoancies are observed on the concrete wash pad. Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following Drocess: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) The EDP shall be taken out of service and the cracks or deficiencies will be repaired utilizing industry standard materials and procedures appropriate for the defect. Following recommended cure times, the cracks or deficiencies will be re- inspected and, if acceptable, the EDP will be placed back into service. White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Book# l9-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Date:J"o/t I neusiole-:Deleted: 9/lo Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Pagellof14 c) A record of the repairs will be maintained as a part of the inspection records at the White Mesa Mill. 5.7. Excess Elevation For Tailines Solids Part I.D.3.c) of the GWDP provides that upon closure of any tailings cell, Denison shall ensure that the maximum elevation of the tailings waste solids does not exceed the top of the FML. In the event that, upon closure of any tailings cell, the maximum elevation of the tailiirgs waste solids exceeds the top of the FML, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery; c) To the extent reasonably practicable, without causing a violation of the freeboard limit in any other tailings cell, Mill personnel will promptly remove tailings solids from the subject tailings cell to another tailings cell, or other location approved by the Executive Secretary, until such time as the maximum elevation of the tailings waste solids in the subject tailings cell does not exceed the top of the FML;and d) Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the exceedance and will implement new procedures or change existing procedures to minimize the chance of a recurTence. ilJelusoil w Executive Secretar.vi 5.[i. Roberts Pond Wastewater Elevation Part I.D.3.e) of the GWDP provides that ttre Permittee shall operate Roberts Pond so as to provide a minimum 2-foot freeboard at all times and that under no circumstances shall the water level in Roberts Pond exceed an elevation of 5,624 feet above mean sea level. In the event that the wastewater elevation exceeds this maximum level, Denison shall remove the excess wastewater and place it into containment in Tailings Cell I within 72 hours of discovery, as specified in Part I.D.3.e) of the GWDP. Comrnent [rft161: Eshblish a tirnelire for rhis subrnittsl. Formatted: Bullets and White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Book#19-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures ,"/ In the event that, Denison fails to;emove,the excesq wastewaterlqgfl:iq J|[qggg[ / clip-c_gverv, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; and b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification and proposed corrective actions within five days of discovery. 5,9. Feedstock Storase Area . Part LD.3.f) and Part I.D.l 1 of the GWDP provide that open-air or bulk storage of all feedstock materials at the Mill facility awaiting Mill processing shall be limited to the eastern portion of the Mill site area described in Table 4 of the GWDP, and that storage of feedstock materials at the facilify outside that area shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Part LD.l l of the GWDP. In the event that, storage of any feedstock at the Mill is not in compliance with the requirements specified in Part I.D.3.f) and Part I.D.l I of ttre GWDP, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of ttre Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery; c) Mill personnel will: (D move any open-air or bulk stored feedstock materials to the portion of the Mill site area described in Table 4 of the GWDP;(iD ensure that any feedstock materials that are stored outside of the area described in Table 4 of ttre GWDP are stored and maintained in accordance with the provisions of Part I.D.l I of the GWDP; and(iii) to the extent that any such containers are observed to be leaking, such leaking containers will be placed into watertight over-pack containers or otherwise dealt with in accordance with the provisions of Part I.D.1 I of the GWDP, and any impacted soils will be removed and will be deposited into the Mill's active tailings cell; and Date: J 9/,l ! !.-elirio,Je-: Page l2 of 14 Deletedr 9/10 9:!3!3L:_ Deleted: any such Formattedr Bullets and Numbering White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Book # l9 - Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Date:J ilit J Reviriofe,-:Deleted: 9/10 lrjtlTJ: Bublish a tirreline for this submittal Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Deleted: does not Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Page l3 of 14 d) Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the non-compliant activity and will implement new of a recurrence. res or change existing procedures to minimize the chance 5.10. Mill Site Chemical Reaeent Storaee . Part I.D.3.g) of the GWDP provides that for all chemical reagents stored at existing storage facilities, Denison shall provide secondary containment to capture and contain all volumes of reagent(s) that might be released at any individual storage area, and that for any new construction ofreagent storage facilities, the secondary containment and control shall prevent any contact ofthe spilled reagent with the ground surface. In the event that Denison{dh'1g prqvide- the reguired qecgn{ary conlaiqrpent reguired under Part I.D.3.g) of the GWDP, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery; and c) Denison will promptly remediate any spilled re-agent resulting from the failure to provide the required secondary containment under Part LD.3.g) of the GWDP, by removal of the contaminated soil and disposal in the active tailings cell. 5.11. Failure to Construct as per Approval . Part I.D.4 of the GWDP provides that any constuction, modification, or operation of new waste or wastewater disposal, heatment, or storage facilities shall require submittal of engineering desiga plans and specifications, and prior Executive Secretary review and approval, and that a Construction Permit may be issued. In the event that, any new waste or wastewater disposal, heatment, or storage facilities are constructed at the Mill facility without obtaining prior Executive Secretary review and approval, or any such facilities are not constructed in accordance with the provisions of any applicable Consfuction Permit, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; and White Mesa Mill - Standard Operating Procedures Book# l9-Groundwater Discharge Permit Plans and Procedures Date: ,l.oil I R-eviriofe-r Page 14 of 14 D€l€ted3 9/10 Formatted: BulleE and Numbering b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification and proposed corrective actions within five days of discovery, 5.12. Failure to Comply with Stormwater Management and Spill Conhol Requirements. - Part LD. l0 of the GWDP provides that Denison will manage all contact and non-contract stormwater and control contaminant spills at the Mill facility in accordance with the currently approved Stormwater Best Management Practices Plan. In the event that any contact or non-contact stormwater or contaminant spills are not managed in accordance with the Mill's approved Stormwater Best Management Practices Plan, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification and proposed corrective actions within five days of discovery; and c) To the extent still practicable at the time of discovery, Denison will manage any such contaminant spill in accordance with the Mill's approved Stormwater Best Management Practices Plan. To the extent it is no longer practicable to so manage any such spill, Denison will agree with the Executive Secretary on appropriate clean up and other measures. Part I Permit No. UGW370004 Executive Secretary requires additional information, the Permittee will provide all requested information within a time frame approved by the Executive Secretary. Upon Executive Secretary approval of the final infiltration and contaminant transport report, the Reclamation Plan may be modified to accommodate necessary changes to protect public health and the environment. I l. Plan for Evaluation of Deep Supply Well WW-2 -the purpose of this plan is to evaluate the annular casing seal in water supply well WW-2, and to ensure adequate well casing and annular seals, in compliance with the regulations of the Utah State Engineer (UAC R655-4-9), with special emphasis on creating both a physical barrier and hydraulic isolation between the shallow unconfined and the deep confined aquifers. Prior to Executive Secretary approval of this plan the Permittee shall resolve all issues within a timeframe approved by the Executive Secretary. After Executive Secretary approval of the plan, the Permittee shall completely execute all provisions of the plan on or before decommissioning of the White Mesa mill. 12.Liner Maintenance Provisions - within 90-days of issuance of this Permit, the Permittee shall submit Liner Maintenance Provisions to be incorporated into the existing DMT Monitoring Plan for Executive Secretary approval. The purpose of said provisions shall be for the equipment, material, training and procedures to be used for the timely detection of any openings in the polymer liners, and the reliable repair and quality assurance testing of any such repairs to the polymer liners for Cells 1,2 and 3 and the Roberts Pond. 13 <Reserved> ithin 180 days of issuance of this Permit, the Permittee shall ingency Plan that provides a detailed list of actions the Permittee will -gain compliance with Permit limits and DMT or BAT requirements defined in Parts I.C and I.D of this Permit. At a minimum, the Contingency Plan will include, but is not limited to measures to resolve the following general categories of non-compliance: a) Groundwater Contamination - as shown by any contaminant concentrations in compliance monitoring wells that exceed their respective groundwater compliance limit found in Part I.C.1 and Table 2 of this Permit. b) Mill Discharge Violations - including unauthorized discharge or release of prohibited contaminants to the tailings cells, pursuant to Partl.C.2 and I.C.3; and c) DMT and BAT Violations - which include several types of non-compliance, including but not limited to: 1) Excess tailings cell wastewater pool elevation above the maximum elevations mandated by Part I.D.3; 2) Excess head in the Tailings Cells 2 and 3 slimes drain system, pursuant to Part I.D.3 and as defined by the DMT Monitoring Plan in Part I.H.l3; and 3) Excess elevation for tailings solids as required by Part I.D.3. If after review of the plan, the Executive-Secretary determines that additional information JJ 15. Contingency Pla 4il1 .a*'l;": rrl Permit No. UGW3700O4 is required, the Permittee shall provide all requested information, resolve all issues identified, and re-submit the plan for Executive Secretary review and approval within a timeframe approved by the Executive Secretary. 16. Revised Stormwater Best Management Practices Plan - on or before May 15, 2008, the Permittee shall submit for Executive Secretary review and approval, a revised Stormwater Best Management Practices Plan to address the effects of Tailings Cell 44. construction and operation. Said plan shall comply with the requirements of Part I.D.l0 of this permit. Upon Executive Secretary approval, the Permittee is to immediately implement all provisions of such plans. 17. <Reserved> 18. Repair of Monitor Well MW-5 - on or before May 1, 2008, the Permittee shall submit an As-Built report to document said repairs for Executive Secretary review and approval. 19. Cell4A BAT Monitoring, Operations and Maintenance Plan. - the Permittee will submit an Operations and Maintenance Plan for Cell 44 for Executive Secretary review and approval. Commencement of wastewater or tailings discharge to Cell 4,A. is prohibited without prior written approval from the Executive Secretary. Said Plan shall include requirements in Part F.3 of the Permit and include, but is not limited to the following: a. Operation and Maintenance Procedures - including operational sequences, transporting methods, equipment operation / maintenance, safety and emergency procedures, b. Operation, Maintenance, Monitoring, and Recordkeeping - for evaluation of the following in accordance with the requirements of Parts I.D.6, I.E.8, and I.F.8: i. Irak detection system - including operational statue of equipment, daily wastewater head, daily flow rates, etc. ii. Slimes drainage system - including operational status of equipment, daily flow rates, monthly wastewater recovery head monitoring, etc, c. Freeboard limits on dikes - including monitoring and proper management and volume inventory controls to prevent release of wastewater to the environment. 20.<Reserved>- QAP 2l.Feedstock Material Stored Outside the Feedstock Storage Area Management Plan - within 30 days of issuance of this Permit the Permittee shall submit for Executive Secretary review and approval a management plan for the feedstock material stored outside the feedstock ore storage area. 22- QAP Revision - on or before April 30, 2008 the Permittee shall modify the QAP and submit a revised revision for Executive Secretary review and approval. Said changes shall require that all non - conformance with QAP requirements discovered in a given quarterly ground water monitoring period will be corrected and reported to the Executive Secretary on or before submittal of the next quarterly ground water monitoring report as required in Part I.E.1(a). 34 I whitc Mesa Mill - Standard Opcrating Itroccdurcs llook # I9-Oroundwsler I)ischargc Pcnnil Plans attd Itroccrlurcs Date: 3!/10 Rcvision: DUSA-?J Pagc I ot'14 WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL CONTINGENCY PLAN As Contemplated by Part I.G,4(d) of State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No.UGW370004 Prepared by: I)enison Mines (USA) Corp. 1050 l7'h Street, Suite 950 Denver CO 80265 Marel*2.$gp_tg.$:,ber 2, 20 I 0 Whitc Mcsl Mill - Standard Opcr'atirrg Proccdurcs llook # l9 - crourldwater Dischargc l)snnit [>lans and Ploccdurcs Dalc: 'r9/10 Rcvision: DUSA-?il Pagc 2 o['14 .[ABI,E OIT CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PURPOSE 3. GROIJNDWATf,RCONTAMINATION3.1. Notification3.2. Continuation of Accelcrated Monitoring3.3. Submission of Plan and Timetable3.4. GrpundwaterRentediationPlan 4. MILL DISCHARGE VIOLATIONS - INCLUDING UNAUTHORIZED DISCUARGE OR IIDLEASE OIT PROHIBITIID CONTAMINANTS TO TI,ID'T'AILING CIILLS4.1. Notifications4.2. l'ield Activities4,3. Request for Applovals and/or Waivers 5. DMT VIOLATIONS5.1. 'l'ailings Cell Wastewater Pool Elevation Above the Maximurn Lllevations5.2. Excess Head in Tailings Cells 2 and 3 Slimes Drain Systerns5.3, Excess Cell 44. Leak Detection lrluid llead or Daily Leak Rate5.4. Excess New Decontarnination Pad Leak Detection Fluid Head5.5. Excess Elevation For Tailings Solids5.6. Itoberts Pond Wastewater Elevation 5.'1 . Feedstock Storage Area5,8. Mill Site Chemical Reagent Storage5.9. fjailurB to Con$truct as per Approval5.10. Failure to Comply with Stortnwater Managernent and Spitl Contr.ol Requirernents Paue No. Jl. ) J 4 4 4 5 6 6 (r 7 7 8II l0 II l1t) l3 l3 Whitc Mcsa Mill - Standard 0puatirrg [rroccdurcs Ilook# l9-Croundwalcr Dischargc l)emril l)lans and Procodurcs Dalc: i9l10 Revision: DLrSA-2i l\tge 3 of 14 WHI'I'II MESA URANIUM MILL CONTINGENCY PLAN State of Utah Grorrndwatcr Discharge permit No. UGW370004 I. IN'I'RODUCTION The State of utah has granled Ground water Discharge perrnit No. uGW370004 (the"cwDP") for Derrison Mine.s (USA) corp.'s ("Denison's") white Mesa uraniurn Mill (the *Mill"). 'l'he CWDP specifies the const*rction, opel.ation, and nronitoring requilernents for all facilities at the Mitl that have a potential to discharge pollutantri dilectly or indirectly into groundwater., 2, PURPOSE 'l'his Contingency Plan (the "Plan") pr'ovides a detailecl list of actions Denison will take to regain cornpliance witlr GWDP lirnits and Discharge Minimization'technology ("DMT") requirernents defined in Parts I,C, l.D, and I.l-1.4 of'ths GWDp. The timely eiecution of contingency and corrective actions outlined in this Plan will provide Deniion with the basis to exercise the Affinnative Actiorr l)el"ense provision in parr I.G,3.c) of the GWDI) and thereby avoid noncompliance status ancl potential eulorcement actionl. 'fhe contingency actions required to regain cornpliance with GwDI, lirnits and DMT requiremerts defined in Parts I.c, LD, and Lll.4 of the GwDp are described below. 3. GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION since there are many different possible scenalios that coutcl potentially give rise togroundwatel contamination, and since the developrnont and irnplerlentation of a remediation progl'am will normally be specific to each palticulal scenario, this Plan cloes not outline a definitive remcdiation program. Rather, this Plan describes the steps thatwill be followed by Denison in the event l)enison is found to be out of cornpliance with respect to any constituent in any rnonitoring well, pursuant to part I.G.2 of the owDp. when the concenh'ation ol'any pararneter in a compliance morritor.ing well is out ofl compliance, Denison will, subject to slrcific lequirelnents of the Executive Secretary as ' Part.l.G.3.c) of thc CWDI'ploviclcs thrt, in thc cvent n conrptinnce action is irritiatcd agahrst Dcnison lbr.violation ollrcrrnit condititns rclatilrg to bcst avrilablc tcchntllogy or DM-l', t)cnison nriy allirrnntivcly dclbnd against that action by dcrnonstr'atirrg that it llas rnaclc appropriatc notilications. that thc Ihiku'e wns uot intcntiorral orcaused by Dcnison's negligcrrcc, tlral l)cnison has takon arlcquatc ulcasur.cs to rncetpcnttit conrlilions irt a tinrely rttanncr or has subrrrittcri an atlcquatc plan rutd scircdulc !'<lr.n:ecting pcr.nrit corrditions, nlld that thc provisions ol'UCA I9-5-107 have no( bccn violated. Whits Mcsa Mill - Standard Opcratilrg Pmccdurcs llook il {9 - Groundlatcr !)isolrarge Pcrmit l)lans and l\'occdurcs set lbrth in any notice, order, reurediation plan pfocess: Datc: 19"/10 Rcvision: DUSA-21 I,agc 4 ol l4 or the equivalent, inrplernent the lollowing 3.1. Notification Denison will notily the Executive Secretary of the out olrcompliance status within 24 hours after detection of that $tatus l'ollowed by a rvritten notice within 5 days after. detection, as lequired undet' Part LG.4.a) of the CWDP. 3.2. Co-Ellinuation ofAccelelated Monitoring Denison wilI continuc accelerated sampling fol the palanreter in that compliance monitoring well pulsuant to Part LG.l ol'the GWDP, unless the Executive Secretary detelrnines that other periodic sampling is approlrriate, until the flacility is lrrought inro cornpliarrce, as lequiled urrder Part I.G.4.b) of the GWDP. If tlre accelerated rnonitoring demonstrates that the Mill is no longer out of cornpliar.rce with respect to a parameter in a wcll, then, with the written approval of the Executive Sectetary, Denison will cease acceleratecl monitoring for the pararneter, and no further. steps will be l'ollowed by Denison with respcct to such pal'alneter. 3.3. Subrli,s"qi.g.Jr of Plan and Tinretable If the accelerated rnonitoring conlirrns that the Mill is out of cornpliance with respect to a paranleter in a well, then, within 30 days of such confirrrlation, Denison will prcpare ancl submit to the F.xecutive Secretary a plan and a tirne scheclule for assessment of the soulces, extent and potential clispersion ofl the contarmination, and an evaluation of polcntial I'emedial action to restole and maintain ground water quality to ensur.e tlrat perrnit linrits will not be exceeded at the cornpliancc monitoring point and that DMT will be rccstablished, as required undel part l.G.4.c) of the GWDP. 'lhis plan will normally include: 'l'he requirernent for Denison to prepare a detailed and cornpr-ehensive opcrational history of the facility and surrounding areas which explores all activities that rnay have contributed to the contamination; A t'equirernent for f)enison to colnplete an evaluation, which rnay include gcochernical and hydrogeological analyses, to detetmine whether ol not the contanrination was caused by Mill activities or was calrsed by natural lbrces or offsite activities; If it is concluded that the contarnination is the le-sult ol'current or past activities at the Mill, Deni.son will prepare a Characterizatiorr Report, which character.izes the physical, chernical, and radiological extent ofthe ground water' a) b) c) Whitc Mcsa Mill - Standard 0pcratirrg l'roccdurcs llook # l9 - Cl'oundwatc'' I)ischargc I)etrnit Plarrs and l'roucdures Datc: i1)/10 Rcvision: DUSA-/r..1 Pagc 5 ol' l4 contalninat,on. 'l'his will normally include a description of any additional wells to be used or installed to characterize the pluurc and the hydrogeologic characteristics ofthe affected zone, the analytical paralneter$ to be obtained, the salnples of ground water to be taken, and any other means to rreasure and characterize the affected ground water and contarnination zone; and d) ll'it is concluded that the cotrtatnination i.s the result of culrent or pa$t activitics at the Mill, Denison will evaluale potential remedial actions, including actions to restore and tnaintairr groundwator quality to ensure that pelrnit liurits will not be exceeded at the cornpliance rnonitoring point and that DMT will be ree.stablished, as well as actions that rnelely allow natural attenuatioD to opemte and actions that involve applying l"or Alternate Concentration Limits ("ACLs"). Ilgroundwater rernediation is lequired, Denison will prepare and subrnit to the Executive Secretary a Ground Water Rernediation Plan, as de.scribed in Section 3.4 below. 3.4. Cloundwater Remediation I>lan Il'the Executive Secretary deter'rnines that ground water rcrncdiation is needed, Dcnison will subrmit a Clound Water Rernediation Plan to the Executive Seclctary within the tirne fi'arne requested by the Executive Secrctary. 'lhs Ground Water Itenrediation Plan will normally include: a) A description and schedule oflrow f)enison will inrplernent a corrective action plogratn that plevents contatninants fi'om exceedirrg the ground wate| plotectiou levels or ACLs at the cornpliance rnonitoring point(s) or othel locations approved by the Executive Secretary, by rernoving the contatninants, treating thcnr in place, or by other mean.s as approved by the Executive Secretary; b) A description of the remediation rnonitoling prograrn to dernor)strate tho effecliveness ofthe plan; and c) Description.s of how couective action will apply to cach source of the pollution. Deni.son will implement the Glound Water Rern<:diation Plan in accordance with a schedule to be sulrntitted by Denison and approved by the Executive Secretaty. 4. MILL DISC[IAIIGE VIOLA'TIONS _ INCLUDING UNAUTTIORIZEI) DISCI.IARGtr OR RELEASE OF PITOHI BI'I'ED CONTA M INANTS]'O'TI{E TAILING CII,LLS Part I.C,2. oflthe GWDP pt'ovides that only lle.(2) by-pt'oducr rnatelial authorized by the Mill's State of [Jtah Radioactive Materials License No. UT-2300478 (the "Radioactive Matcrials Licen.se") shall be discharged to or disposed of in the Mill's tailings cells. Whitc Mcsa Mill- Standard Opcrating Proecdurcs llook /l t9 - Grrundwatcr' Dischargc Pcnni( Plarrs and ['toccdulcs Datc: .1r)/10 Rcvision: DUSA-2,] Pagc 6 ol' l4 Part LC.3 of tho CWDP provides that discharge ol"other.compoutrds into the Mill's tailings cells, such as paints, used oil, antifleeze, pqsticides, or any other oontarnioant not defined as I Ie .(2) material is prohibited. In the event ofany unauthorized disposal ofcontanrinants or wastes (the "Unauthorized Materials") to the Mill's tailings cells, Denison will, subject to any specific l.equiremonts ofthe Executive Secletary as set forth in any noticq order, rernediation plan or the equivalent, irnplernent the flol lowing prcce-ss: 4.1. Notifications a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified imrnediately; and b) Derrison will plovide verbal notification to the Executive Secletary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written norification within five day.s of discovery. 4,2. field Activitiest a) lJpon discovery, Mill personnel will irnrnediately cease placernent of Unauthotized Matelials into the Mill's tailings cells; b) 'fo the extent reasonably practicable and in a nlanner that can be accornplished safely, Mill personnel will atternpt to segregate the Unauthorized Materials frorn other tailings rnatelials and nrark or rccord the location ofthe Unauthorized Materials in the tailings cells. If it is not reasonably practicable to safely segregatc the Unauthorized Material frorn other tailings rnatelials, Mill personnel will neveltheless mark or record the location of the ljnauthorized Materials in the tailings cells; c) 'fo the extent reasonably placticable and in a lnanner that can be accornplished saf'ely, Mill personnel will attempt to rernove the Unautholized Material fi.om the tailings cells; arrd d) Denison will dispose of the Unauthorized Material under applicable State and Fedelal regulations. 4.3. Recluest for Approvals and/or Wqivcrs Il it is not reasonably practicable to safely rrcmove the Unauthorized Materials fiorn the tailings cells, then Denison will: White Mesa Mill* Slandard Opcr'atirrg l,roccdurr:s []ook /l l9 * (iroulldwatcr I)ischargc [)crrnit l'lans tnd Pr <lcodrrrcs Dalc: l9_/10 Revision: DUSA-Z,] [>agc 7 of l4 Submit a written report to the Executive Secretary altalyzing the health, safety and envilorlrnental irnpacts, if any, associated with the permanent disposal ofl the Unauthorized Material in the Mill's tailings cells; Apply to the Executive Secretary fol any atnendments that rnay be required to the CWDP and the Radioactive Materials License to ploperly accornmodate the perrnanent disposal of the Unauthorized Material in the Mill's tailings cells in a nlannel that is protective ofhealth, safety and the environment; and Make all applications required under the United States Nuclear llcgularory Comrnission's ("NI{C's") Non-t le.(2) Disposal Policy, including obtaining appl'oval of the Department of Energy as the long teun custodian of the Mill's tailings, in order to obtain appl'oval to per$ancntly dispose of the Unauthorized Material in the Mill's tailings cells. DMT VIOLA'I'IONS Tailing$..9sl Wastewater P.q9l--Elevation Above the Maxirnurrl.Elcvationi Pam I.D.2 and Palt I.D.6.d) of the CWDP provide that authorized oper.ation and tnaxirnum disposal capacity in each olthe existing tailings cells shali not excced the levels authorized by the lladioactivc Matclials [,icense and that under no cilcurnstances shall the fleeboard be less than three f'eet, as measurcd fi'orn thc top of the flexible membrarre liner ("FML"). In the event that taitings cell wastewater pool elevation in any tailings cell exceeds the rnaxirnurn elevations mandated by Part I.D.2 and Part I.D.6.d) of the GWDP, Denison will, subject to any specific requirernents oflthe Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, inrplernent the Following pt.ocess: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or ltSO will be notified imrnediately; t ) Denison will provide velbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 houls of cliscovcry lollowed l>y a written notification within five day.s of discovely; Upon discovely, Mill personnel will cease to discharge any further tailings to the subject tailings cello until such tirne as adequate fi'eeboard capacity exists in thc subjcct tailings cell fol the disposal ofthe tailings; To the extent reasorably practicable, witlrout causing a violation of thc fi.eeboard lirnit in any other tailings cell, Mitl pelsounel will pLornptly purnp fluids fi'orn the subject tailings cell to anotlrer taitings cell until such tinre as the freeboard limit for the subject tailings ccll is in cor"npliance. If there is no r.oorn available in a) b) c) 5. 5. r. c) d) Whitc Mcsl Mill - Standard Opcratirrg l)roccdurcs Ilook // l9 - Croundwatsr I)isohargo l)cruit I)lans and l)rcccdures Datc: .i9l10 Revision: DUSA-7,1 Pagc 8 ol'l4 another tailings cell, without violating rhe fi'eeboald lirnit of such othcr cell, then, as soorl as leasonably practicable, Mill per.sonnel will cease to discharge any l'urther tailings to any tailings cell until such tilne as adequate fi.eeboard capacity exists in all tailings cells; If it is not reasonably practicable to pulnp sufficient .solutions fi.orn the subject tailings cell ro another tailings cell, then the solution Ievcls in the subject tailings cell will be reduced through natur.al evaporalion; and Denison will pcrfolrn a root cause analysis of tlre excee<lance and will irnplement new procedures or change cxisting procedures to mininrize thc chance ofa l'ecuIIonce. 5.2, Excess Flead in .Iailinss Cells 2.,.:) and 4A glirncs Drain System.: Part LD.3.b)l) of the GWDP provides that Deni.son .shall at all times maintairr the average wastewatcl head in the slirnes drain access llipe in cell 2 to be as low as reasonably achievable, in accordance with ihe Mill's currently approved DMT Monitoring plan , ancl that for Cell 3, this leguirernent shall apply onty after initiation of de-watering operations. Sirnilarly, Part LD.6,c) of the GWDP provides that al'tel I)enison initiates pun.'ping conditions in the slinres dlain layer in Cell 44, Dcnison will provicle: l) continuous declining lluid heads in the slirnes drain laycr, irr a rlanncr equivalent to the requirernent.s Ibund in Palt LD.3.b); and 2) a rnaxirrum head of 1.0 lbet in the tailings (as rneasured fi'orn the lowest point of the upper FML) in 6.4 years or less. In the event that the average wastewater'head in the slirnes dtain access pipe for Cell 2 or, af,ter initiation of tle-watering activities, Cell 3 or initiation of purnping conditions in rhe slirnes dlain layel in cell 4A exceeds the levels specified in the DMT Monitor.ing Plan, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set for.th in any notice, order, rernediatiorr plan or the eguivalent, implernent the fbllowing process: a) Upon disoovely, the Mill Manager or IISO will be notified irnmediately; b) Mill personnel will promptly punrp the excess fluicl into an active tailings cell, or other appropriate containrnent ol evaporalion facility approved by the Exccutive Secretary; c) If theexceedance is theresult of equiplnent f'ailure, Mill pelsonnet will attenrpt to repail ol' rcplace the equillncnt; d) Iflthe cause of the exceedance is not rectified within 24 hours, Denison will plovide verbal notification to the Executive Secreta.y within thc ensuing 24 hours followed by a wr,itten notification within five days; and e) Whits Mcsa Mill - Slandard Operating Proccdures Ilook ll l9 - Croundwatcr' I)ischargc l)ctrrrit Plaos aud l)roccclules Dalo: 32/10 Rcvision: DUSA-3] l'rtgc 9 ol l4 e) If not due to an identified equipment failure, Denison will perfolm a root cause analysis of the exceedar)ce atrd will irnplernent new procedules or change existing procedules to rninirnize the chance ol'a recurrence. 5.3. Elqegq.Cg!l4A Leak Detection System Fluid Head oL Dailv Leak Rate Part LD.6.a) pr<lvides that the fluid head in tlre Leak Detection Systern (*LDS") for Cell 44. shall not exceect I foot above the lowest poillt in the lower membrane liner, and Pad LD.6.b) of the GWDP plovides that the maximum allowable daily leak rate measured in the LDS fol Cell 44' shall not excoed 24,160 gallons/day. In the event that the fluid head in the LDS for Cell 4A exceeds I foot above the lowest point in the lower rnemblarre layel or the daily leak rate measuted irr the Cell 4A LDS exceeds 24,160 gallons/day, Denison will, subject to any specific requirernents ofthe Executive Sccretary as set forth in any notice, order, renrediation plan or the equivalent, i nrplernent lhe following process: Upon discovely, the Mill Manager or ttSO will be notified imrnediately; Mill personnel will plornptly purnp the excess fluid into an active tailirrgs cell, ot' othel appropriate containnrent or evaporation l'acility approved by the Executive Secretary, until such tirne as tho cause ofexceedance is rectified or untiI such time as otherwi.se directed by the Executive Secretary; If the exceedance is the result of equipment failure, Mill personnel will atte tnpt to repair ol replace the equiprnent; If the cause ofthe exceedance is not rectified within 24 houls, Denison will provide velbal notification to the Executive Secretary within the ensuing 24 hours I'ollowed by a written notification within five days; and If not due to an identified equiprnent fhilurc, Denison will peLfbrm a l'oot cause analysis of the exceedance and will irnplernerrt rrew procedures or change existing procedules to lerne diatc the exceedance and to rninitniec the chance ofl a IecuI[ence. Excess Neg"[)..99--oI!autinati-qn-P-ad L.eak Detection.S\isJ.9m.Iluid Hcad In order to en-sure that the plirnary contaiumcnt of the New f)ecorrtamittation Pad water collection systern has not been cornprornised, and to plovide an inspection capability to detect leakage fi'om the plirnary containment in each oIthe thlee settling tanks, a vertical inspection portal has bcen installed between the plirnary and sccondaly containrnent of each settling tank. a) b) c) d) e) 5.4, I Wlitc Mcsa Mill - Shndud Drtc: 39/10 Rcvision: DUSA+I Operating Procedures Book # 19 - Croundwater Page l0 of t4 Discharge Pcrmit Plans and Procedures Section 3.1(e) of the Mill's DMT Monitoring Plan providcs that the fluid head in the LDS for the New Decontamination Pad shall not exceed 0.10 feet above the concrete floor in any ofthc three standpipes. In the event that the fluid hcad in the standpipe for a settling tank cxceeds 0. l0 feet above the concrete floor in the standpipe, Denison will, subject to any specific rcquiremcnts of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remcdiation plan or the equivalcnt, implement thc following process: a) Upon discovery, thc Mill Manager or RSO will be notilied immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within the ensuing 24 hours followed by a written notification within five days; c) Mill personnel will promptly pump the fluid from the satling tank's LDS as well as the fluids in the scttling tank into another settling tank or into an active tailings cell, or other appropriate containment or cvaporation facility approved by the Executive Secretary, until such time as the cause ofthe exceedance is rectified or until such time as otherwise directed by the Executive Secretary; and d) Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the exceedance and, if appropriate, will implement new procedures or change existing procedures to remediate the exceedance and to minimize the chance of a recurrence. 5.5. Cracks or Physical Discreoancies on the New Decontamination pad Wash pad. In the event that cracks or other physical discrepancies are observed on the concrete wash pad. Denison will. subject to any specific reqgirements ofthe Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice. order. remediation plan or the equivalent. implement the following process: aI Upon discovery"the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately: b) lhe EDP shall be taken out of service and the cracks or deficiencies will be repaired utilizing industry slandard materials and plocedures aporopriate for the defect, Following recommended cure times. the cracks or deficiencies will be re- Urspgq!e,_d_.and. if aSqgpfaile,lhs EDP will bs placed back into ;qvi!s. c) A rccord of the reoairs will be maintained as a part of the inspgction records at the White Mesa Mill. $*5.6. Excess Elevation For Tailines Solids Whitc Mesil Mill * Standard Olrcrating l)roccdurcs tlook Il l9 - Croundwater I)ischarge Pcnnit I,larls and Pr<rccdurcs Dntc: 39/10 Rcvision: DUSA.a..l I,agcllof14 Part I.D.3.c) of the GWDP provides that upon ctosure of any tailings cell, Derrison shall ensuro that the maxinturn elevation ofthe tailings waste solids does not exceed the top of tho FML. hr the event that, upon closur'e of any tailings cell, the maxirnum slevation of the tailings waste solids exceeds the top of the FML, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secletary as set forth in any notice, or.dei, rernediation plan ol'the equivalent, irnplement the following t)locess: a) Upon discovely, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified irnmecliately; b) Denison witl providc velbal notification to rhe Executive Secr-etary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a wr.itten notification within five clays of discovely; To the extent reasonably practicablq without causing a violation of the frEeboalcl linrit in any other tailings csll, Mill personnel will prorrrptly rtrrlovc tailing.s solids frorn the subject tailings cell to another tailings cell, or.other location approvcd by tlre Executive secretary, untiI such time as the rnaxirnum elevation ofl the tailings waste solids in the sub.iect taitings cell does not cxceed the top of the FML; and Denison will perform a root cause analysis ol'the exceedance and will irnplement new procedures or change existing procedures to minimize the chance ofa l'ecurTence. 1i,6,5,7,-Roberts Pond Wastewate!:_[ilevation Pat I.D.3.e) of the GWDP prnvides that the Pelmittee shall operate Robelts Pontl so as to provide a tninimurn 2-foot fleeboalcl at all tirnes ancl that under no circunrstances shall the watet level in Robert.s Pond exceed an elevation of 5,624lbet above mean sea lcvel. Irr the event that the wastewatel elevation exceeds this rnaximum level, Denison shall remove the excess wastewater and place it into containment in 'tailings Cell I within 72 hours of discovery, as specified in Part I.D.3.e) of the GWDp. In the evenl that, Denison I'ails to,so rernovc any such excess wastewater, Denison will, subject to any specific requiretnents of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or thc equivaletrt, irnplement the following pr.ocess: a) Upo. discovery, rhe Mill Manager or RSO will be notified irnneciiately; and c) d) Whitc Mcsa Mill - Standard Opcrating I)roccdurcs B<tok ll l9 - (iroundwatcr' l)ischargc l'cnnit l)lans and Proccdur cs t u,., ;r.1/10Ilcvision: DIJSA-21 l'agc 12 of'14 b) Denison will provide vofbal notification to the Executive Secletary within 24 lrours of discovet'y followed by a wlitten notitlcation and proposed col'rective actions within five days of discovery. 5'jl'-5.,!.,. [:eedstock Storage Area Part I.D.3.fl) and Part I.D.l 1 oF the CWDP provide that open-air. or bulk sroragc ofl all feedstock rnaterials at tlre Mill lacility awaiting Mill processing shall be limited to the eastern portion ol'the Mill site al'ea described in -fable 4 of the GWDP, and that storage ol'feedstock rnatelials at the facility outside that alea shall be perflot'tned in accoldance with the plovisions of Part I.D. I t of the GWDP. In tlre event that, storage of any feedstock at the Mill is not in cornpliancc with the requirements specified in l,art LD.3,l) and Part LD.l I of the GWDP, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements olthe Executive Secretary as set lorth in any notice, ofder, renlediatiorr plan or the equivalent, implenrerrt the following processi a) Upon di.scovery, the Miti Manager or RSO will be noritjcd inrrnediately; b) Donison will provide vcrbal notification to the Executive Sccr.etary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a wr.itten notification within five days of discovery; c) Millpersonnel will: (i) move any open-ail or bulk stored feedstock materials to the pofiion o[the Mill site area desclibed in'l'able 4 of the CWDP;(ii) ensure that any l'eedstock rnaterials that are stoled outside olths area desclibed in'l'able 4 olthe GWDP ar.e stored and nraintained in accordance with the plovisions of Part I.D.1t of ths GWDP; and(iii) to the extent that any such containcrs are obsel.ved to be lcaking, such lcaking cot)tainers will be placed into watertight over-pack containers or otherwise dealt with in accor-dance with the pr.ovisions of Part I.D.1 t of the GWDP, and any inrpacted soils will be rentoved and will be deposited into the Mill's active tailings cell; and d) f)enison will pelfolm a root cause analysis of the non-cornpliant activity and will irnplernent new plocedures ot changc cxistirrg plocedules to rninirnize tlre chauce of a recurrence. 5.ti'5.t). Mill .$it"g Cl.hernical Reagent glqraqe I'}alt I.D.3.g) ol'the GWDP provides that for all chernical reagenrs stol.ed at existing storage facilities, Denison shall provide secondaly containrnent to capture and contain all Whitc Mcsa Mill- Standard Olrcrating Procodurcs llook /l t9 * Croundwater Dischargu Pcrrnit Plans ancl l'roccdtncs Datc: 11/10 Rcvision: DIJSA-?,3 Pagc l3 of'14 volumes of reagent(s) that might be released at any individual storage area, and that for any new construction ofleagent $torago facilities, the secondary containtn€nt and control shall prevant any contact ofthe spitled reagent with the ground surface. In the event tlrat Denison does not provide the rrquirc'tl secondary containment required under Part I.D.3.g) of the GWDP, Denison will, subject to any specific requirernents of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order', r'ernediation plan or the equivalent, i rnplement the fol lowing process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Managel or RSO will be notified irnrnediately; b) Denison will providc velbal notification to the Executive Secretary witlrin 24 hours of discovely followed by a written notification within five days of discovely; and c) Denison will prornptly remediate any spilled re-agent resulting fi'orn the failure to provide the required secondary containfient under Part Ltl.3.g) of the GWDP, by rernoval ofthe contaminated soil and disposal in the active tailings cell, 5'9':i. 10. [ailure to Construct ?s,l)pJApprpy.Al. Parl LD.4 ofl the CWDI' prtvides that any collstruction, rnodification, or olteration of new waste or wastewater di.sposal, tleatrnent, or storage facilitics shall require subrnittal of engineering design plans and specifications, and prior Executive Secrctaly review and approval, and that a Construction Perrnit rnay be issued. In tlre event tlrat, any new waste or wastewater disposal, tlcatment, or stot'age facilities alc cotrstructed at the Mill facility without obtaining prior Executive Secretary rcview and approval, or any such lhcilities aro not constl'ucted in accordance with the plovisiorrs of any applicable Consh'uction Pelmit, Derrison will, subject to any specific lequirernents of the Executive Secretaty as sef forth in any notice, order, r'emediation plan or.the equi valent, i rnplernent the fol lowin g process: a) [Jpon discovery, the Mill Managel or RSO will be notified immediately; and b) Dcnison will pLovide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours ofdiscovery followed by a written notification and proposed corrective actions within five days of cliscovery. .i.10,5..1_1. ._ Failure to Cornply with Stolfi]WAtel:Marla,rcrlen! and Spilt Conrrol I(erluirements White Mcsa Mill - Standard Opcr'atirrg l)toccdur r.:s llook il l9 - Croundrvatct l)ischarge Pelrnit Plans alld l)roccdurcs Datc: i1)/10 Revision: DUSA-3] Pagc [4 ol'[4 Part l.D.l0 of the GWDP ptovide$ that Denison will manage all contact and non-contact storD'rwator and conh'ol cotltatninant spills at the Mill facility in accordanco with the cul'rently approved Stormwater Best Managernent Practices Plan. In the event that any contact or non-contact stormwater ot corrtalninarlt spills are not lnanaged in accordance with the Mill's approved Stonnwater Best Managernenl Practices Plan, Deni.son will, subject to any specific requirernents of the Executive Secretal'y as set forth in any notice, order, rernediatiorr plan or the equivalent, itnpletnent the following procgss; a) 1r) c) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager oI RSO will bc notifictl irnmediately; Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours ofdiscovery followed by a written notification and proposed corrective actions within five days of discovct'y; and 'Io the extent still placticable at th€ time olcliscovery, f)enison will manage any such contarninant spill in accordance with the Mill's approved Storrnwater Best Management Plactices Plan. '[o the extent it is no longor practicable to so lnallago any such spill, f)enison will agree with thc Executive Secretary on appropriate clean up and other meafiufes, WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL CONTINGENCY PLAN As Required Under Part I.H.16 of State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No.UGW370004 Prepared by: Denison Mines (USA) Corp. 1050 17th Street, Suite 950 Denver CO 80265 October 12,2007 Page No. 31. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PURPOSE GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION Notification Continuation of Accelerated Monitoring Submission of Plan and Timetable Groundwater Remediation Plan MILL DISCHARGE VIOLATIONS - INCLUDING ., 3. 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. 3.4. 4. J 4 4 4 5 6 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 11 11 UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR RELEASE OF PROHIBITED CONTAMINANTS TO THE TAILING CELLS 4.1. Notifications 4.2. Field Activities 4.3. Request for Approvals and/or Waivers 5. DMT VIOLATIONS 5.1. Tailings Cell Wastewater Pool Elevation Above the Maximum Elevations 5.2. Excess Head in Tailings Cells 2 and 3 Slimes Drain Systems 5.3. Excess Elevation For Tailings Solids 5.4. Roberts Pond Wastewater Elevation 5.5. Feedstock Storage Area 5.6. Mill Site Chemical Reagent Storage 5.7. Failure to Construct as per Approval 5.8. Failure to Comply with Stormwater Management and Spill Control Requirements WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL CONTINGENCY PLAN State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 1. INTRODUCTION The State of Utah has granted Ground Water Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (the "GWDP") for Denison Mines (USA) Corp.'s ("Denison's") White Mesa Uranium Mill (the "Mill"). The GWDP specifies the construction, operation, and monitoring requirements for all facilities at the Mill that have a potential to discharge pollutants directly or indirectly into groundwater. )PURPOSE This Contingency Plan (the "PIan") provides a detailed list of actions Denison will take to regain compliance with GWDP limits and Discharge Minimization Technology ("DMT") requirements defined in Parts I.C and I.D of the GWDP. The timely execution of contingency and corective actions outlined in this Plan will provide Denison with the basis to exercise the Affirmative Action Defense provision in Part LG.3.c) of the GWDP and thereby avoid noncompliance status and potential enforcement actionl. The contingency actions required to regain compliance with GWDP limits and DMT requirements defined in Parts I.C and I.D of the GWDP are described below. 3. GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION Since there are many different possible scenarios that could potentially give rise to groundwater contamination, and since the development and implementation of a remediation program will normally be specific to each particular scenario, this Plan does not outline a definitive remediation program. Rather, this Plan describes the steps that will be followed by Denison in the event Denison is found to be out of compliance with respect to any constituent in any monitoring well, pursuant to PartI.G.2 of the GWDP. When the concentration of any parameter in a compliance monitoring well is out of compliance, Denison will, subject to specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: t Part I.C.3.c) of the GWDP provides that, in the event a compliance action is initiated against Denison for violation of permit conditions relating to best available technology or DMT, Denison may affirmatively defend against that action by demonstrating that it has made appropriate notifications, that the failure was not intentional or caused by Denison's negligence, that Denison has taken adequate measures to meet permit conditions in a timely manner or has submitted an adequate plan and schedule for meeting permit conditions, and that the provisions of UCA 19-5-107 have not been violated. 3.1. Notification Denison will notify the Executive Secretary of the out of compliance status within 24 hours after detection of that status followed by a written notice within 5 days after detection, as required under Part I.G.4.a) of the GWDP. 3.2. Continuation of Accelerated Monitoring Denison will continue accelerated sampling for the parameter in that compliance monitoring well pursuant to Part I.G.1 of the GWDP, unless the Executive Secretary determines that other periodic sampling is appropriate, until the facility is brought into compliance, as required under Part I.G.4.b) of the GWDP. If the accelerated monitoring demonstrates that the Mill is no longer out of compliance with respect to a parameter in a well, then, with the written approval of the Executive Secretary, Denison will cease accelerated monitoring for the parameter, and no further steps will be followed by Denison with respect to such parameter. 3.3. Submission of Plan and Timetable If the accelerated monitoring confirms that the Mill is out of compliance with respect to a parameter in a well, then, within 30 days of such confirmation, Denison will prepare and submit to the Executive Secretary a plan and a time schedule for assessment of the sources, extent and potential dispersion of the contamination, and an evaluation of potential remedial action to restore and maintain ground water quality to ensure that permit limits will not be exceeded at the compliance monitoring point and that DMT will be reestablished, as required under part I.G.4.c) of the GWDP. This plan will normally include: The requirement for Denison to prepare a detailed and comprehensive operational history of the facility and surrounding areas which explores all activities that may have contributed to the contamination; A requirement for Denison to complete an evaluation, which may include geochemical and hydrogeological analyses, to determine whether or not the contamination was caused by Mill activities or was caused by natural forces or offsite activities; If it is concluded that the contamination is the result of current or past activities at the Mill, Denison will prepare a Characterization Report, which characterizes the physical, chemical, and radiological extent of the ground water contamination. This will normally include a description of any additional wells to be used or installed to characterize the plume and the hydrogeologic characteristics of the affected zone, the analytical parameters to be obtained, the a) b) c) samples of ground water to be taken, and any other means to measure and characterize the affected ground water and contamination zone; and d) If it is concluded that the contamination is the result of current or past activities at the Mill, Denison will evaluate potential remedial actions, including actions to restore and maintain groundwater quality to ensure that permit limits will not be exceeded at the compliance monitoring point and that DMT will be reestablished, as well as actions that merely allow natural attenuation to operate and actions that involve applying for Alternate Concentration Limits ("ACLs"). If groundwater remediation is required, Denison will prepare and submit to the Executive Secretary a Ground Water Remediation Plan, as described in Section 3.4 below. 3.4. Groundwater Remediation Plan If the Executive Secretary determines that ground water remediation is needed, Denison will submit a Ground Water Remediation Plan to the Executive Secretary within the time frame requested by the Executive Secretary. The Ground Water Remediation Plan will normally include: a) A description and schedule of how Denison will implement a corrective action program that prevents contaminants from exceeding the ground water protection levels or ACLs at the compliance monitoring point(s) or other locations approved by the Executive Secretary, by removing the contaminants, treating them in place, or by other means as approved by the Executive Secretary; b) A description of the remediation monitoring program to demonstrate the effectiveness ofthe plan; and c) Descriptions of how corrective action will apply to each source of the pollution. Denison will implement the Ground Water Remediation Plan in accordance with a schedule to be submitted by Denison and approved by the Executive Secretary. 4. MILL DISCHARGE VIOLATIONS - INCLUDING UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR RELEASE OF PROHIBITED CONTAMINANTS TO THE TAILING CELLS Part I.C.2. of the GWDP provides that only lle.(2) by-product material authorized by the Mill's State of Utah Radioactive Materials License No. UT-2300478 (the "Radioactive Materials License") shall be discharged to or disposed of in the Mill's tailings cells. Part I.C.3 of the GWDP provides that discharge of other compounds into the Mill's tailings cells, such as paints, used oil, antifreeze, pesticides, or any other contaminant not defined as l1e.(2) material is prohibited. ln the event of any unauthorized disposal of contaminants or wastes (the "Unauthorized Materials") to the Mill's tailings cells, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: 4.1. Notifications a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; and b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery. 4.2. Field Activities a) Upon discovery, Mill personnel will immediately cease placement of Unauthorized Materials into the Mill's tailings cells; b) To the extent reasonably practicable and in a manner that can be accomplished safely, Mill personnel will attempt to segregate the Unauthorized Materials from other tailings materials and mark or record the location of the Unauthorized Marerials in the tailings cells. If it is not reasonably practicable to safely segregate the Unauthorized Material from other tailings materials, Mill personnel will nevertheless mark or record the location of the Unauthorized Materials in the tailings cells; c) To the extent reasonably practicable and in a manner that can be accomplished safely, Mill personnel will attempt to remove the Unauthorized Material from the tailings cells; and d) Denison will dispose of the Unauthorized Material under applicable State and Federal regulations. 4.3. Reouest for Anorovals and/or Waivers If it is not reasonably practicable to safely remove the Unauthorized Materials from the tailings cells, then Denison will: a) Submit a written report to the Executive Secretary analyzing the health, safety and environmental impacts, if any, associated with the permanent disposal of the Unauthorized Material in the Mill's tailings cells; b) Apply to the Executive Secretary for any amendments that may be required to the GWDP and the Radioactive Materials License to properly accommodate the permanent disposal of the Unauthorized Material in the Mill's tailings cells in a manner that is protective of health, safety and the environment; and 6 c) Make all applications required under the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission's ("NRC's") Non-I le.(2) Disposal Policy, including obtaining approval of the Department of Energy as the long term custodian of the Mill's tailings, in order to obtain approval to permanently dispose of the Unauthorized Material in the Mill's tailings cells. 5. DMT VIOLATIONS 5.1. Tailinss Cell Wastewater Pool Elevation Above the Maximum Elevations Partl.D.2 of the GWDP provides that authorized operation and maximum disposal capacity in each of the existing tailings cells shall not exceed the levels authorized by the Radioactive Materials License and that under no circumstances shall the freeboard be less than three feet, as measured from the top of the flexible membrane liner ("FML"). In the event that tailings cell wastewater pool elevation in any tailings cell exceeds the maximum elevations mandated by Part 1.D.2 of the GWDP, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery; Upon discovery, Mill personnel will cease to discharge any further tailings to the subject tailings cell, until such time as adequate freeboard capacity exists in the subject tailings cell for the disposal of the tailings; To the extent reasonably practicable, without causing a violation of the freeboard Iimit in any other tailings cell, Mill personnel will promptly pump fluids from the subject tailings cell to another tailings cell until such time as the freeboard limit for the subject tailings cell is in compliance. If there is no room available in another tailings cell, without violating the freeboard limit of such other cell, then, as soon as reasonably practicable, Mill personnel will cease to discharge any further tailings to any tailings cell until such time as adequate freeboard capacity exists in all tailings cells; If it is not reasonably practicable to pump sufficient solutions from the subject tailings cell to another tailings cell, then the solution levels in the subject tailings cell will be reduced through natural evaporation; and c) d) e) 0 Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the exceedance and will implement new procedures or change existing procedures to minimize the chance of a recurrence. 5.2. Excess Head in Tailings Cells 2 and 3 Slimes Drain Systems Part I.D.3.b)1) of the GWDP provides that Denison shall at all times maintain the average wastewater head in the slimes drain access pipe in Cell 2 to be as low as reasonably achievable, in accordance with a DMT Monitoring Plan approved by the Executive Secretary pursuant to Part I.H.13 of the GWDP, and that for Cell 3, this requirement shall apply only after initiation of de-watering operations. In the event that the average wastewater head in the slimes drain access pipe for Cell 2 or, after initiation of de-watering activities, Cell 3 exceeds the levels specified in the DMT Monitoring Plan, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) b) c) d) e) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; Mill personnel will promptly pump the excess fluid into an active tailings cell, or other appropriate containment or evaporation facility approved by the Executive Secretary; If the exceedance is the result of equipment failure, Mill personnel will attempt to repair or replace the equipment; If the cause of the exceedance is not rectified within 24 hours, Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within the ensuing 24 hours followed by a written notification within five days; and If not due to an identified equipment failure, Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the exceedance and will implement new procedures or change existing procedures to minimize the chance of a recurrence. Excess Elevation For Tailings Solids5.3. Part I.D.3 b)2) of the GWDP provides that upon closure of any tailings cell, Denison shall ensure that the maximum elevation of the tailings waste solids does not exceed the top of the FML. In the event that, upon closure of any tailings cell, the maximum elevation of the tailings waste solids exceeds the top of the FML, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) b) c) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery; To the extent reasonably practicable, without causing a violation of the freeboard limit in any other tailings cell, Mill personnel will promptly remove tailings solids from the subject tailings cell to another tailings cell, or other location approved by the Executive Secretary, until such time as the maximum elevation of the tailings waste solids in the subject tailings cell does not exceed the top of the FML; and Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the exceedance and will implement new procedures or change existing procedures to minimize the chance of a recuffence. Roberts Pond Wastewater Elevation d) 5.4. Part I.D.3 c) of the GWDP provides that the Permittee shall operate Roberts Pond so as to provide a minimum 2-foot freeboard at all times and that under no circumstances shall the water level in Roberts Pond exceed an elevation of 5,624 feet above mean sea level. In the event that the wastewater elevation exceeds this maximum level, Denison shall remove the excess wastewater and place it into containment in Tailings Cell I within 72 hours of discovery, as specified in Part I.D.3 c) of the GWDP. In the event that, Denison fails to so remove any such excess wastewater, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; and b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification and proposed corrective actions within five days of discovery. 5.5. Feedstock Storage Area Part I.D.3. d) of the GWDP provides that open-air or bulk storage of all feedstock materials at the Mill facility awaiting Mill processing shall be limited to the eastern portion of the Mill site area described in Table 4 of the GWDP, and that storage of feedstock materials at the facility outside that area shall be performed and maintained only in closed, water-tight containers. 9 In the event that, storage of any feedstock at the Mill is not in compliance with the requirements specified in Part LD.3. d) of the GWDP, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery; c) Mill personnel will: (i) move any open-air or bulk stored feedstock materials to the portion of the Mill site area described in Table 4 of the GWDP; (ii) ensure that any feedstock materials that are stored outside of the area described in Table 4 of the GWDP are stored and maintained in closed, water-ti ght containers ; and(iii) to the extent that any such containers are observed to be leaking, such leaking containers will be placed into watertight over-pack containers, and any impacted soils will be removed and will be deposited into the Mill's active tailings cell; and d) Denison will perform a root cause analysis of the non-compliant activity and will implement new procedures or change existing procedures to minimize the chance of a recurrence. 5.6. Mill Site Chemical Reasent Storage Part I.D.3. e) of the GWDP provides that for all chemical reagents stored at existing storage facilities, Denison shall provide secondary containment to capture and contain all volumes of reagent(s) that might be released at any individual storage area, and that for any new construction of reagent storage facilities, the secondary containment and control shall prevent any contact of the spilled reagent with the ground surface. In the event that Denison does not provide the required secondary containment required under Part I.d.3. e) of the GWDP, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; b) Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification within five days of discovery; and 10 c) Denison will promptly remediate any spilled re-agent resulting from the failure to provide the required secondary containment under Part I.d.3.e) of the GWDP, by removal of the contaminated soil and disposal in the active tailings cell. 5.7. Failure to Construct as per Approval Part I.D.4 of the GWDP provides that any construction, modification, or operation of new waste or wastewater disposal, treatment, or storage facilities shall require submittal of engineering design plans and specifications, and prior Executive Secretary review and approval, and that a Construction Permit may be issued. In the event that, any new waste or wastewater disposal, treatment, or storage facilities are constructed at the Mill facility without obtaining prior Executive Secretary review and approval, or any such facilities are not constructed in accordance with the provisions of any applicable Construction Permit, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: a) b) Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; and Denison will privide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification and proposed corrective actions within five days of discovery. Failure to Comply_with Stormwater Management and Spill Control Requirements5.8. Part I.D.8 of the GWDP provides that Denison will manage all contact and non-contact stormwater and control contaminant spills at the Mill facility in accordance with an approved Stormwater Best Management Practices Plan, pursuant to Part I.H.17 of the GWDP. In the event that any contact or non-contact stormwater or contaminant spills are not managed in accordance with the Mill's approved Stormwater Best Management Practices Plan, Denison will, subject to any specific requirements of the Executive Secretary as set forth in any notice, order, remediation plan or the equivalent, implement the following process: Upon discovery, the Mill Manager or RSO will be notified immediately; Denison will provide verbal notification to the Executive Secretary within 24 hours of discovery followed by a written notification and proposed corrective actions within five days of discovery; and To the extent still practicable at the time of discovery, Denison will manage any such contaminant spill in accordance with the Mill's approved Stormwater Best Management Practices Plan. To the extent it is no longer practicable to so a) b) c) 1l manage any such spill, Denison will agree with the Executive secretary on appropriate clean up and other measures.