Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDWQ-2024-007847 Page 1 of 3 Utah Division of Water Quality Statement of Basis ADDENDUM Wasteload Analysis and Antidegradation Level I Review Date: October 16, 2024 Prepared by: Suzan Tahir Standards and Technical Services Facility: Oldcastle Precast, UPDES Permit No. UT0025577 Receiving water: Storm Drain => Plain City Canal => Mill Creek (2B, 3C, 3D, 4) This addendum summarizes the wasteload analysis that was performed to determine water quality based effluent limits (WQBEL) for this discharge. Wasteload analyses are performed to determine point source effluent limitations necessary to maintain designated beneficial uses by evaluating projected effects of discharge concentrations on in-stream water quality. The wasteload analysis also takes into account downstream designated uses (UAC R317-2-8). Projected concentrations are compared to numeric water quality standards to determine acceptability. The numeric criteria in this wasteload analysis may be modified by narrative criteria and other conditions determined by staff of the Division of Water Quality. Discharge 001 Process water 0.0001 MGD Receiving Water The discharge flows to an Ogden City storm drain which discharges to the Plain City Canal which flows through the Ogden Nature Preserve for approximately ½ mile before emptying into Mill Creek. Mill Creek is tributary to the Weber River. Per UAC R317-2-13.4.a, the designated beneficial uses of the Weber River from the Great Salt Lake to Slaterville diversion (with exceptions) are: • Class 2B -- Protected for infrequent primary contact recreation. Also protected for secondary contact recreation where there is a low likelihood of ingestion of water or a low degree of bodily contact with the water. Examples include, but are not limited to, wading, hunting, and fishing. Utah Division of Water Quality Wasteload Analysis Oldcastle Precast UPDES Permit No. UT0025577 Page 2 of 3 • Class 3C -- Protected for nongame fish and other aquatic life, including the necessary aquatic organisms in their food chain. • Class 3D -- Protected for waterfowl, shore birds and other water-oriented wildlife not included in Classes 3A, 3B, or 3C, including the necessary aquatic organisms in their food chain. • Class 4 -- Protected for agricultural uses including irrigation of crops and stock watering. Flow Typically, the critical flow for the wasteload analysis is considered the lowest stream flow for seven consecutive days with a ten year return frequency (7Q10). No flow data was available for the receiving stream. During the past permit renewal cycle, the wasteload analyst Dave Wham conducted site visits and consulted with Ogden Nature Conservancy staff, and decided that the critical low flow in Mill Creek is estimated to be 1.0 cfs. This permit renewal cycle also assumes the same flow value. The receiving water quality was estimated using best professional judgement both in the past and for this renewal cycle. Protection of Downstream Uses Per UAC R317-2-8, all actions to control waste discharges under these rules shall be modified as necessary to protect downstream designated uses. For this discharge, 3B numeric aquatic life use criteria apply to the immediate receiving water (Mill Creek). TMDL According to the Utah’s 2024 303(d) Water Quality Assessment Report, the receiving water for the discharge is Mill Creek. Mill Creek is not assessed but it flows into Weber River (Weber River- 1, Weber River and tributaries from Great Salt Lake to Slaterville Diversion, UT16020102-001_00) which is not supporting benthic macroinvertebrates. Mixing Zone The maximum allowable mixing zone is 15 minutes of travel time for acute conditions, not to exceed 50% of stream width, and for chronic conditions, per UAC R317-2-5. Water quality standards must be met at the end of the mixing zone. Complete mixing was assumed based on the receiving water being a storm drain/canal. Acute and chronic limits were calculated using 100% of the critical low flow. Parameters of Concern The parameters of concern are total suspended solids (TSS), pH and oil and grease. No new potential parameters of concern were identified for the discharge based on review of the impairment status of the receiving water and review of the previous permit. Utah Division of Water Quality Wasteload Analysis Oldcastle Precast UPDES Permit No. UT0025577 Page 3 of 3 WET Limits The percent of effluent in the receiving water in a fully mixed condition, and acute and chronic dilution in a not fully mixed condition are calculated in the WLA in order to generate WET limits. The LC50 (lethal concentration, 50%) percent effluent for acute toxicity and the IC25 (inhibition concentration, 25%) percent effluent for chronic toxicity, as determined by the WET test, needs to be below the WET limits, as determined by the WLA. The WET limit for LC50 is typically 100% effluent and does not need to be determined by the WLA. IC25 WET limits for Outfall 001 should be based on 0.015 % effluent. Wasteload Allocation Methods Effluent limits were determined for conservative constituents using a simple mass balance mixing analysis (UDWQ 2012). The mass balance analysis is summarized in the Wasteload Addendums. The water quality standard for chronic ammonia toxicity is dependent on temperature and pH, and the water quality standard for acute ammonia toxicity is dependent on pH. The AMMTOX Model developed by University of Colorado and adapted by Utah DWQ and EPA Region VIII was used to determine ammonia effluent limits (Lewis et al. 2002). The analysis is summarized in the Wasteload Addendum. Models and supporting documentation are available for review upon request. Antidegradation Level I Review The objective of the Level I ADR is to ensure the protection of existing uses, defined as the beneficial uses attained in the receiving water on or after November 28, 1975. No evidence is known that the existing uses deviate from the designated beneficial uses for the receiving water. Therefore, the beneficial uses will be protected if the discharge remains below the WQBELs presented in this wasteload. A Level II Antidegradation Review (ADR) is not required for this facility. The proposed permit is a simple renewal of an existing UPDES permit. No increase in flow or concentration of pollutants over those authorized in the existing permit is being requested. Documents: WLA Document : OldcastlePrecast_WLADoc_10-10-2024.docx Wasteload Analysis and Addendums: • OldcastlePrecast_WLA_10-10-2024.xlsm • OldcastlePrecast_WLA_SOB_10-10-2024.pdf References: Utah Division of Water Quality. 2024. Final 2024 Integrated Report on Water Quality Utah Division of Water Quality. 2021. Utah Wasteload Analysis Procedures Version 2.0. Lewis, B., J. Saunders, and M. Murphy. 2002. Ammonia Toxicity Model (AMMTOX, Version2): A Tool for Determining Effluent Ammonia Limits. University of Colorado, Center for Limnology. Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah WASTELOAD ANALYSIS [WLA]10-Oct-24 Addendum: Statement of Basis Facilities: Oldcastle Precast UPDES No:UT-0025577 Discharging to:Storm Drain=>Plain City Canal=>Mill Creek Design Flow:0.0001 MGD I. Introduction Wasteload analyses are performed to determine point source effluent limitations necessary to maintain designated beneficial uses by evaluating projected effects of discharge concentrations on in-stream water quality. The wasteload analysis also takes into account downstream designated uses [R317-2-8, UAC]. Projected concen- trations are compared to numeric water quality standards to determine acceptability. The anti-degradation policy and procedures are also considered. The primary in-stream parameters of concern may include metals (as a function of hardness), total dissolved solids (TDS), total residual chlorine (TRC), un-ionized ammonia (as a function of pH and temperature, measured and evaluated interms of total ammonia), and dissolved oxygen. Mathematical water quality modeling is employed to determine stream quality response to point source discharges. Models aid in the effort of anticipating stream quality at future effluent flows at critical environmental conditions (e.g., low stream flow, high temperature, high pH, etc). The numeric criteria in this wasteload analysis may always be modified by narrative criteria and other conditions determined by staff of the Division of Water Quality. II. Receiving Water and Stream Classification Storm Drain=>Plain City Canal=>Mill Creek :2B, 3C, 3D, 4 Antidegradation Review:Level I review completed. Level II review not required. III. Numeric Stream Standards for Protection of Aquatic Wildlife Total Ammonia (TNH3)Varies as a function of Temperature and pH Rebound. See Water Quality Standards Chronic Total Residual Chlorine (TRC)0.011 mg/l (4 Day Average) 0.019 mg/l (1 Hour Average) Chronic Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 5.00 mg/l (30 Day Average) N/A mg/l (7Day Average) 3.00 mg/l (1 Day Average Maximum Total Dissolved Solids 1200.0 mg/l Page 1 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah Acute and Chronic Heavy Metals (Dissolved) 4 Day Average (Chronic) Standard 1 Hour Average (Acute) Standard Parameter Concentration Load*Concentration Load* Aluminum 87.00 ug/l**0.000 lbs/day 750.00 ug/l 0.001 lbs/day Arsenic 190.00 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day 340.00 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Cadmium 1.98 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day 5.29 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Chromium III 211.93 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day 4433.90 ug/l 0.004 lbs/day ChromiumVI 11.00 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day 16.00 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Copper 23.85 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day 39.42 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Iron 1000.00 ug/l 0.001 lbs/day Lead 12.88 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day 330.62 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Mercury 0.0120 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day 2.40 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Nickel 132.14 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day 1188.49 ug/l 0.001 lbs/day Selenium 4.60 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day 20.00 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Silver N/A ug/l N/A lbs/day 25.04 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Zinc 303.95 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day 303.95 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day * Allowed below discharge **Chronic Aluminum standard applies only to waters with a pH < 7.0 and a Hardness < 50 mg/l as CaCO3 Metals Standards Based upon a Hardness of 300.02 mg/l as CaCO3 Organics [Pesticides] 4 Day Average (Chronic) Standard 1 Hour Average (Acute) Standard Parameter Concentration Load*Concentration Load* Aldrin 1.500 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Chlordane 0.004 ug/l 0.023 lbs/day 1.200 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day DDT, DDE 0.001 ug/l 0.005 lbs/day 0.550 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Dieldrin 0.002 ug/l 0.010 lbs/day 1.250 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Endosulfan 0.056 ug/l 0.302 lbs/day 0.110 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Endrin 0.002 ug/l 0.012 lbs/day 0.090 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Guthion 0.010 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Heptachlor 0.004 ug/l 0.020 lbs/day 0.260 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Lindane 0.080 ug/l 0.431 lbs/day 1.000 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Methoxychlor 0.030 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Mirex 0.010 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Parathion 0.040 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day PCB's 0.014 ug/l 0.075 lbs/day 2.000 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Pentachlorophenol 13.00 ug/l 70.081 lbs/day 20.000 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Toxephene 0.0002 ug/l 0.001 lbs/day 0.7300 ug/l 0.000 lbs/day Page 2 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah IV. Numeric Stream Standards for Protection of Agriculture 4 Day Average (Chronic) Standard 1 Hour Average (Acute) Standard Concentration Load*Concentration Load* Arsenic 100.0 ug/l lbs/day Boron 750.0 ug/l lbs/day Cadmium 10.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Chromium 100.0 ug/l lbs/day Copper 200.0 ug/l lbs/day Lead 100.0 ug/l lbs/day Selenium 50.0 ug/l lbs/day TDS, Summer 1200.0 mg/l 0.00 tons/day V. Numeric Stream Standards for Protection of Human Health (Class 1C Waters) 4 Day Average (Chronic) Standard 1 Hour Average (Acute) Standard Metals Concentration Load*Concentration Load* Arsenic ug/l lbs/day Barium ug/l lbs/day Cadmium ug/l lbs/day Chromium ug/l lbs/day Lead ug/l lbs/day Mercury ug/l lbs/day Selenium ug/l lbs/day Silver ug/l lbs/day Fluoride (3)ug/l lbs/day to ug/l lbs/day Nitrates as N ug/l lbs/day Chlorophenoxy Herbicides 2,4-D ug/l lbs/day 2,4,5-TP ug/l lbs/day Endrin ug/l lbs/day Hexachlorocyclohexane (Lindane)ug/l lbs/day Methoxychlor ug/l lbs/day Toxaphene ug/l lbs/day VI. Numeric Stream Standards the Protection of Human Health from Water & Fish Consumption [Toxics] Maximum Conc., ug/l - Acute Standards Class 1C Class 3A, 3B Toxic Organics [2 Liters/Day for 70 Kg Person over 70 Yr.] [6.5 g for 70 Kg Person over 70 Yr.] Acenaphthene ug/l lbs/day 2700.0 ug/l 14.56 lbs/day Acrolein ug/l lbs/day 780.0 ug/l 4.20 lbs/day Acrylonitrile ug/l lbs/day 0.7 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Benzene ug/l lbs/day 71.0 ug/l 0.38 lbs/day Benzidine ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Carbon tetrachloride ug/l lbs/day 4.4 ug/l 0.02 lbs/day Chlorobenzene ug/l lbs/day 21000.0 ug/l 113.21 lbs/day 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobenzene ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/l lbs/day 99.0 ug/l 0.53 lbs/day 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Hexachloroethane ug/l lbs/day 8.9 ug/l 0.05 lbs/day Page 3 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/l lbs/day 42.0 ug/l 0.23 lbs/day 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/l lbs/day 11.0 ug/l 0.06 lbs/day Chloroethane 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether ug/l lbs/day 1.4 ug/l 0.01 lbs/day 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day 2-Chloronaphthalene ug/l lbs/day 4300.0 ug/l 23.18 lbs/day 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/l lbs/day 6.5 ug/l 0.04 lbs/day p-Chloro-m-cresol 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Chloroform (HM)ug/l lbs/day 470.0 ug/l 2.53 lbs/day 2-Chlorophenol ug/l lbs/day 400.0 ug/l 2.16 lbs/day 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/l lbs/day 17000.0 ug/l 91.64 lbs/day 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/l lbs/day 2600.0 ug/l 14.02 lbs/day 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/l lbs/day 2600.0 ug/l 14.02 lbs/day 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/l lbs/day 0.1 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day 1,1-Dichloroethylene ug/l lbs/day 3.2 ug/l 0.02 lbs/day 1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene1 ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day 2,4-Dichlorophenol ug/l lbs/day 790.0 ug/l 4.26 lbs/day 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/l lbs/day 39.0 ug/l 0.21 lbs/day 1,3-Dichloropropylene ug/l lbs/day 1700.0 ug/l 9.16 lbs/day 2,4-Dimethylphenol ug/l lbs/day 2300.0 ug/l 12.40 lbs/day 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/l lbs/day 9.1 ug/l 0.05 lbs/day 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ug/l lbs/day 0.5 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Ethylbenzene ug/l lbs/day 29000.0 ug/l 156.33 lbs/day Fluoranthene ug/l lbs/day 370.0 ug/l 1.99 lbs/day 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether ug/l lbs/day 170000.0 ug/l 916.44 lbs/day Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Methylene chloride (HM)ug/l lbs/day 1600.0 ug/l 8.63 lbs/day Methyl chloride (HM)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Methyl bromide (HM)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Bromoform (HM)ug/l lbs/day 360.0 ug/l 1.94 lbs/day Dichlorobromomethane(HM)ug/l lbs/day 22.0 ug/l 0.12 lbs/day Chlorodibromomethane (HM)ug/l lbs/day 34.0 ug/l 0.18 lbs/day Hexachlorobutadiene(c)ug/l lbs/day 50.0 ug/l 0.27 lbs/day Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ug/l lbs/day 17000.0 ug/l 91.64 lbs/day Isophorone ug/l lbs/day 600.0 ug/l 3.23 lbs/day Naphthalene Nitrobenzene ug/l lbs/day 1900.0 ug/l 10.24 lbs/day 2-Nitrophenol ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day 4-Nitrophenol ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day 2,4-Dinitrophenol ug/l lbs/day 14000.0 ug/l 75.47 lbs/day 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol ug/l lbs/day 765.0 ug/l 4.12 lbs/day N-Nitrosodimethylamine ug/l lbs/day 8.1 ug/l 0.04 lbs/day N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ug/l lbs/day 16.0 ug/l 0.09 lbs/day N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ug/l lbs/day 1.4 ug/l 0.01 lbs/day Pentachlorophenol ug/l lbs/day 8.2 ug/l 0.04 lbs/day Phenol ug/l lbs/day 4.6E+06 ug/l 2.48E+04 lbs/day Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ug/l lbs/day 5.9 ug/l 0.03 lbs/day Butyl benzyl phthalate ug/l lbs/day 5200.0 ug/l 28.03 lbs/day Di-n-butyl phthalate ug/l lbs/day 12000.0 ug/l 64.69 lbs/day Di-n-octyl phthlate Page 4 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah Diethyl phthalate ug/l lbs/day 120000.0 ug/l 646.90 lbs/day Dimethyl phthlate ug/l lbs/day 2.9E+06 ug/l 1.56E+04 lbs/day Benzo(a)anthracene (PAH)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Benzo(a)pyrene (PAH)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Benzo(b)fluoranthene (PAH)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Benzo(k)fluoranthene (PAH)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Chrysene (PAH)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Acenaphthylene (PAH) Anthracene (PAH)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (PAH)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (PAH)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Pyrene (PAH)ug/l lbs/day 11000.0 ug/l 59.30 lbs/day Tetrachloroethylene ug/l lbs/day 8.9 ug/l 0.05 lbs/day Toluene ug/l lbs/day 200000 ug/l 1078.17 lbs/day Trichloroethylene ug/l lbs/day 81.0 ug/l 0.44 lbs/day Vinyl chloride ug/l lbs/day 525.0 ug/l 2.83 lbs/day lbs/day Pesticides lbs/day Aldrin ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Dieldrin ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Chlordane ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day 4,4'-DDT ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day 4,4'-DDE ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day 4,4'-DDD ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day alpha-Endosulfan ug/l lbs/day 2.0 ug/l 0.01 lbs/day beta-Endosulfan ug/l lbs/day 2.0 ug/l 0.01 lbs/day Endosulfan sulfate ug/l lbs/day 2.0 ug/l 0.01 lbs/day Endrin ug/l lbs/day 0.8 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Endrin aldehyde ug/l lbs/day 0.8 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Heptachlor ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Heptachlor epoxide PCB's PCB 1242 (Arochlor 1242)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day PCB-1254 (Arochlor 1254)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day PCB-1221 (Arochlor 1221)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day PCB-1232 (Arochlor 1232)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day PCB-1248 (Arochlor 1248)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day PCB-1260 (Arochlor 1260)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day PCB-1016 (Arochlor 1016)ug/l lbs/day 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Pesticide Toxaphene ug/l 0.0 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Dioxin Dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD)ug/l lbs/day Metals Antimony ug/l lbs/day Arsenic ug/l lbs/day 4300.00 ug/l 23.18 lbs/day Asbestos ug/l lbs/day Beryllium Cadmium Page 5 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah Chromium (III) Chromium (VI) Copper Cyanide ug/l lbs/day 2.2E+05 ug/l 1185.98 lbs/day Lead ug/l lbs/day Mercury 0.15 ug/l 0.00 lbs/day Nickel 4600.00 ug/l 24.80 lbs/day Selenium ug/l lbs/day Silver ug/l lbs/day Thallium 6.30 ug/l 0.03 lbs/day Zinc There are additional standards that apply to this receiving water, but were not considered in this modeling/waste load allocation analysis. VII. Mathematical Modeling of Stream Quality Model configuration was accomplished utilizing standard modeling procedures. Data points were plotted and coefficients adjusted as required to match observed data as closely as possible. The modeling approach used in this analysis included one or a combination of the following models. (1) The Utah River Model, Utah Division of Water Quality, 1992. Based upon STREAMDO IV (Region VIII) and Supplemental Ammonia Toxicity Models; EPA Region VIII, Sept. 1990 and QUAL2E (EPA, Athens, GA). (2) Utah Ammonia/Chlorine Model, Utah Division of Water Quality, 1992. (3) AMMTOX Model, University of Colorado, Center of Limnology, and EPA Region 8 (4) Principles of Surface Water Quality Modeling and Control. Robert V. Thomann, et.al. Harper Collins Publisher, Inc. 1987, pp. 644. Coefficients used in the model were based, in part, upon the following references: (1) Rates, Constants, and Kinetics Formulations in Surface Water Quality Modeling. Environmen- tal Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens Georgia. EPA/600/3-85/040 June 1985. (2) Principles of Surface Water Quality Modeling and Control. Robert V. Thomann, et.al. Harper Collins Publisher, Inc. 1987, pp. 644. VIII. Modeling Information The required information for the model may include the following information for both the upstream conditions at low flow and the effluent conditions: Flow, Q, (cfs or MGD)D.O. mg/l Temperature, Deg. C.Total Residual Chlorine (TRC), mg/l Page 6 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah pH Total NH3-N, mg/l BOD5, mg/l Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), mg/l Metals, ug/l Toxic Organics of Concern, ug/l Other Conditions In addition to the upstream and effluent conditions, the models require a variety of physical and biological coefficients and other technical information. In the process of actually establishing the permit limits for an effluent, values are used based upon the available data, model calibration, literature values, site visits and best professional judgement. Model Inputs The following is upstream and discharge information that was utilized as inputs for the analysis. Dry washes are considered to have an upstream flow equal to the flow of the discharge. Current Upstream Information Stream Critical Low Flow Temp.pH T-NH3 BOD5 DO TRC TDS cfs Deg. C mg/l as N mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l Summer (Irrig. Season)1.00 20.0 8.2 0.10 1.00 6.98 0.00 400.0 Fall 1.00 16.0 8.2 0.10 1.00 --- 0.00 400.0 Winter 1.00 4.0 8.1 0.10 1.00 --- 0.00 400.0 Spring 1.00 12.0 8.1 0.10 1.00 --- 0.00 400.0 Dissolved Al As Cd CrIII CrVI Copper Fe Pb Metals ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l All Seasons 2.385*0.795*0.0795*0.795*3.975*0.8*1.25*0.795* Dissolved Hg Ni Se Ag Zn Boron Metals ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l All Seasons 0.0000 0.795*1.59*0.15*0.0795*1.59** ~80% MDL Page 7 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah Projected Discharge Information Season Flow, MGD Temp. Summer 0.00010 20.0 Fall 0.00010 16.0 Winter 0.00010 4.0 Spring 0.00010 12.0 All model numerical inputs, intermediate calculations, outputs and graphs are available for discussion, inspection and copy at the Division of Water Quality. IX. Effluent Limitations Current State water quality standards are required to be met under a variety of conditions including in-stream flows targeted to the 7-day, 10-year low flow (R317-2-9). Other conditions used in the modeling effort coincide with the environmental conditions expected at low stream flows. Effluent Limitation for Flow based upon Water Quality Standards In-stream criteria of downstream segments will be met with an effluent flow maximum value as follows: Season Daily Average Summer 0.0001 MGD 0.0002 cfs Fall 0.0001 MGD 0.0002 cfs Winter 0.0001 MGD 0.0002 cfs Spring 0.0001 MGD 0.0002 cfs Flow Requirement or Loading Requirement The calculations in this wasteload analysis utilize the maximum effluent discharge flow of 0.0001 MGD. If the discharger is allowed to have a flow greater than 0.0001 MGD during 7Q10 conditions, and effluent limit concentrations as indicated, then water quality standards will be violated. In order to prevent this from occuring, the permit writers must include the discharge flow limititation as indicated above; or, include loading effluent limits in the permit. Effluent Limitation for Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) based upon WET Policy Effluent Toxicity will not occur in downstream segements if the values below are met. WET Requirements LC50 >100.0%Effluent [Acute] IC25 >0.015%Effluent [Chronic] Page 8 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah Effluent Limitation for Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) based upon Water Quality Standards or Regulations In-stream criteria of downstream segments for Dissolved Oxygen will be met with an effluent BOD limitation as follows: Season Concentration Summer 25.0 mg/l as BOD5 0.0 lbs/day Fall 25.0 mg/l as BOD5 0.0 lbs/day Winter 25.0 mg/l as BOD5 0.0 lbs/day Spring 25.0 mg/l as BOD5 0.0 lbs/day Effluent Limitation for Dissolved Oxygen (DO) based upon Water Quality Standards In-stream criteria of downstream segments for Dissolved Oxygen will be met with an effluent D.O. limitation as follows: Season Concentration Summer 5.50 Fall 5.50 Winter 5.50 Spring 5.50 Effluent Limitation for Total Ammonia based upon Water Quality Standards In-stream criteria of downstream segments for Total Ammonia will be met with an effluent limitation (expressed as Total Ammonia as N) as follows: Season Concentration Load Summer 4 Day Avg. - Chronic 8296.06 mg/l as N 6.9 lbs/day 1 Hour Avg. - Acute 26526.6 mg/l as N 22.1 lbs/day Fall 4 Day Avg. - Chronic 13600.8 mg/l as N 11.3 lbs/day 1 Hour Avg. - Acute 30962.3 mg/l as N 25.8 lbs/day Winter 4 Day Avg. - Chronic 13281.3 mg/l as N 11.1 lbs/day 1 Hour Avg. - Acute 30278.0 mg/l as N 25.2 lbs/day Spring 4 Day Avg. - Chronic 10633.2 mg/l as N 8.9 lbs/day 1 Hour Avg. - Acute 25899.8 mg/l as N 21.6 lbs/day Acute limit calculated with an Acute Zone of Initial Dilution (ZID) to be equal to 100.%. Page 9 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah Effluent Limitation for Total Residual Chlorine based upon Water Quality Standards In-stream criteria of downstream segments for Total Residual Chlorine will be met with an effluent limitation as follows: Season Concentration Load Summer 4 Day Avg. - Chronic 64.527 mg/l 0.05 lbs/day 1 Hour Avg. - Acute 116.148 mg/l 0.10 lbs/day Fall 4 Day Avg. - Chronic 64.527 mg/l 0.05 lbs/day 1 Hour Avg. - Acute 116.148 mg/l 0.10 lbs/day Winter 4 Day Avg. - Chronic 64.527 mg/l 0.05 lbs/day 1 Hour Avg. - Acute 116.148 mg/l 0.10 lbs/day Spring 4 Day Avg. - Chronic 64.527 mg/l 0.05 lbs/day 1 Hour Avg. - Acute 116.148 mg/l 0.10 lbs/day Effluent Limitations for Total Dissolved Solids based upon Water Quality Standards Season Concentration Load Summer Maximum, Acute ########mg/l 2.16 tons/day Fall Maximum, Acute ########mg/l 2.16 tons/day Winter Maximum, Acute ########mg/l 2.16 tons/day Spring Maximum, Acute ########mg/l 2.16 tons/day Colorado Salinity Forum Limits Determined by Permitting Section Effluent Limitations for Total Recoverable Metals based upon Water Quality Standards In-stream criteria of downstream segments for Dissolved Metals will be met with an effluent limitation as follows (based upon a hardness of 300.02 mg/l): 4 Day Average 1 Hour Average Concentration Load Concentration Load Aluminum*N/A N/A #########ug/l 2.0 lbs/day Arsenic*1.22E+06 ug/l 0.7 lbs/day #########ug/l 0.9 lbs/day Cadmium 12,297.95 ug/l 0.0 lbs/day 16,861.3 ug/l 0.0 lbs/day Chromium III 1.36E+06 ug/l 0.7 lbs/day 1.43E+07 ug/l 12.0 lbs/day Chromium VI*45,421.47 ug/l 0.0 lbs/day 38,881.5 ug/l 0.0 lbs/day Copper 149,075.79 ug/l 0.1 lbs/day 124,862.1 ug/l 0.1 lbs/day Iron*N/A N/A #########ug/l 2.7 lbs/day Lead 78,157.08 ug/l 0.0 lbs/day #########ug/l 0.9 lbs/day Mercury*77.52 ug/l 0.0 lbs/day 7,759.3 ug/l 0.0 lbs/day Nickel 849,144.02 ug/l 0.5 lbs/day #########ug/l 3.2 lbs/day Selenium*19,461.61 ug/l 0.0 lbs/day 59,522.3 ug/l 0.0 lbs/day Silver N/A ug/l N/A lbs/day 80,965.4 ug/l 0.1 lbs/day Zinc 1.96E+06 ug/l 1.1 lbs/day 982,423.9 ug/l 0.8 lbs/day Cyanide*33,618.65 ug/l 0.0 lbs/day 71,127.4 ug/l 0.1 lbs/day Page 10 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah *Limits for these metals are based on the dissolved standard. Effluent Limitations for Heat/Temperature based upon Water Quality Standards Summer 25,880.5 Deg. C.46,616.9 Deg. F Fall 25,876.5 Deg. C.46,609.7 Deg. F Winter 25,864.5 Deg. C.46,588.1 Deg. F Spring 25,872.5 Deg. C.46,602.5 Deg. F Effluent Limitations for Organics [Pesticides] Based upon Water Quality Standards In-stream criteria of downstream segments for Organics [Pesticides] will be met with an effluent limit as follows: 4 Day Average 1 Hour Average Concentration Load Concentration Load Aldrin 1.5E+00 ug/l 1.94E-06 lbs/day Chlordane 4.30E-03 ug/l 3.59E-06 lbs/day 1.2E+00 ug/l 1.55E-06 lbs/day DDT, DDE 1.00E-03 ug/l 8.34E-07 lbs/day 5.5E-01 ug/l 7.11E-07 lbs/day Dieldrin 1.90E-03 ug/l 1.58E-06 lbs/day 1.3E+00 ug/l 1.62E-06 lbs/day Endosulfan 5.60E-02 ug/l 4.67E-05 lbs/day 1.1E-01 ug/l 1.42E-07 lbs/day Endrin 2.30E-03 ug/l 1.92E-06 lbs/day 9.0E-02 ug/l 1.16E-07 lbs/day Guthion 0.00E+00 ug/l 0.00E+00 lbs/day 1.0E-02 ug/l 1.29E-08 lbs/day Heptachlor 3.80E-03 ug/l 3.17E-06 lbs/day 2.6E-01 ug/l 3.36E-07 lbs/day Lindane 8.00E-02 ug/l 6.67E-05 lbs/day 1.0E+00 ug/l 1.29E-06 lbs/day Methoxychlor 0.00E+00 ug/l 0.00E+00 lbs/day 3.0E-02 ug/l 3.88E-08 lbs/day Mirex 0.00E+00 ug/l 0.00E+00 lbs/day 1.0E-02 ug/l 1.29E-08 lbs/day Parathion 0.00E+00 ug/l 0.00E+00 lbs/day 4.0E-02 ug/l 5.17E-08 lbs/day PCB's 1.40E-02 ug/l 1.17E-05 lbs/day 2.0E+00 ug/l 2.58E-06 lbs/day Pentachlorophenol 1.30E+01 ug/l 1.08E-02 lbs/day 2.0E+01 ug/l 2.58E-05 lbs/day Toxephene 2.00E-04 ug/l 1.67E-07 lbs/day 7.3E-01 ug/l 9.43E-07 lbs/day Page 11 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah Effluent Targets for Pollution Indicators Based upon Water Quality Standards In-stream criteria of downstream segments for Pollution Indicators will be met with an effluent limit as follows: 1 Hour Average Concentration Loading Gross Beta (pCi/l)50.0 pCi/L BOD (mg/l)5.0 mg/l 0.0 lbs/day Nitrates as N 4.0 mg/l 0.0 lbs/day Total Phosphorus as P 0.05 mg/l 0.0 lbs/day Total Suspended Solids 90.0 mg/l 0.1 lbs/day Note: Pollution indicator targets are for information purposes only. Effluent Limitations for Protection of Human Health [Toxics Rule] Based upon Water Quality Standards (Most stringent of 1C or 3A & 3B as appropriate.) In-stream criteria of downstream segments for Protection of Human Health [Toxics] will be met with an effluent limit as follows: Maximum Concentration Concentration Load Toxic Organics Acenaphthene 1.75E+07 ug/l 1.46E+01 lbs/day Acrolein 5.04E+06 ug/l 4.20E+00 lbs/day Acrylonitrile 4.27E+03 ug/l 3.56E-03 lbs/day Benzene 4.59E+05 ug/l 3.83E-01 lbs/day Benzidine ug/l lbs/day Carbon tetrachloride 2.84E+04 ug/l 2.37E-02 lbs/day Chlorobenzene 1.36E+08 ug/l 1.13E+02 lbs/day 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobenzene 4.98E+00 ug/l 4.15E-06 lbs/day 1,2-Dichloroethane 6.40E+05 ug/l 5.34E-01 lbs/day 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Hexachloroethane 5.75E+04 ug/l 4.80E-02 lbs/day 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.72E+05 ug/l 2.26E-01 lbs/day 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 7.11E+04 ug/l 5.93E-02 lbs/day Chloroethane Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 9.05E+03 ug/l 7.55E-03 lbs/day 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2-Chloronaphthalene 2.78E+07 ug/l 2.32E+01 lbs/day 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 4.20E+04 ug/l 3.50E-02 lbs/day p-Chloro-m-cresol Chloroform (HM)3.04E+06 ug/l 2.53E+00 lbs/day 2-Chlorophenol 2.59E+06 ug/l 2.16E+00 lbs/day 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.10E+08 ug/l 9.16E+01 lbs/day 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.68E+07 ug/l 1.40E+01 lbs/day 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.68E+07 ug/l 1.40E+01 lbs/day 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4.98E+02 ug/l 4.15E-04 lbs/day Page 12 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah 1,1-Dichloroethylene 2.07E+04 ug/l 1.73E-02 lbs/day 1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene1 2,4-Dichlorophenol 5.11E+06 ug/l 4.26E+00 lbs/day 1,2-Dichloropropane 2.52E+05 ug/l 2.10E-01 lbs/day 1,3-Dichloropropylene 1.10E+07 ug/l 9.16E+00 lbs/day 2,4-Dimethylphenol 1.49E+07 ug/l 1.24E+01 lbs/day 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 5.88E+04 ug/l 4.91E-02 lbs/day 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 3.49E+03 ug/l 2.91E-03 lbs/day Ethylbenzene 1.87E+08 ug/l 1.56E+02 lbs/day Fluoranthene 2.39E+06 ug/l 1.99E+00 lbs/day 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether 1.10E+09 ug/l 9.16E+02 lbs/day Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane Methylene chloride (HM)1.03E+07 ug/l 8.63E+00 lbs/day Methyl chloride (HM) Methyl bromide (HM) Bromoform (HM)2.33E+06 ug/l 1.94E+00 lbs/day Dichlorobromomethane(HM)1.42E+05 ug/l 1.19E-01 lbs/day Chlorodibromomethane (HM)2.20E+05 ug/l 1.83E-01 lbs/day Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1.10E+08 ug/l 9.16E+01 lbs/day Isophorone 3.88E+06 ug/l 3.23E+00 lbs/day Naphthalene Nitrobenzene 1.23E+07 ug/l 1.02E+01 lbs/day 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dinitrophenol 9.05E+07 ug/l 7.55E+01 lbs/day 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 4.95E+06 ug/l 4.12E+00 lbs/day N-Nitrosodimethylamine 5.24E+04 ug/l 4.37E-02 lbs/day N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1.03E+05 ug/l 8.63E-02 lbs/day N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 9.05E+03 ug/l 7.55E-03 lbs/day Pentachlorophenol 5.30E+04 ug/l 4.42E-02 lbs/day Phenol 2.97E+10 ug/l 2.48E+04 lbs/day Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 3.81E+04 ug/l 3.18E-02 lbs/day Butyl benzyl phthalate 3.36E+07 ug/l 2.80E+01 lbs/day Di-n-butyl phthalate 7.76E+07 ug/l 6.47E+01 lbs/day Di-n-octyl phthlate Diethyl phthalate 7.76E+08 ug/l 6.47E+02 lbs/day Dimethyl phthlate 1.87E+10 ug/l 1.56E+04 lbs/day Benzo(a)anthracene (PAH)2.00E+02 ug/l 1.67E-04 lbs/day Benzo(a)pyrene (PAH)2.00E+02 ug/l 1.67E-04 lbs/day Benzo(b)fluoranthene (PAH)2.00E+02 ug/l 1.67E-04 lbs/day Benzo(k)fluoranthene (PAH)2.00E+02 ug/l 1.67E-04 lbs/day Chrysene (PAH)2.00E+02 ug/l 1.67E-04 lbs/day Acenaphthylene (PAH) Anthracene (PAH) Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (PAH)2.00E+02 ug/l 1.67E-04 lbs/day Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (PAH)2.00E+02 ug/l 1.67E-04 lbs/day Pyrene (PAH)7.11E+07 ug/l 5.93E+01 lbs/day Tetrachloroethylene 5.75E+04 ug/l 4.80E-02 lbs/day Toluene 1.29E+09 ug/l 1.08E+03 lbs/day Trichloroethylene 5.24E+05 ug/l 4.37E-01 lbs/day Vinyl chloride 3.39E+06 ug/l 2.83E+00 lbs/day Page 13 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah Pesticides Aldrin 9.05E-01 ug/l 7.55E-07 lbs/day Dieldrin 9.05E-01 ug/l 7.55E-07 lbs/day Chlordane 3.81E+00 ug/l 3.18E-06 lbs/day 4,4'-DDT 3.81E+00 ug/l 3.18E-06 lbs/day 4,4'-DDE 3.81E+00 ug/l 3.18E-06 lbs/day 4,4'-DDD 5.43E+00 ug/l 4.53E-06 lbs/day alpha-Endosulfan 1.29E+04 ug/l 1.08E-02 lbs/day beta-Endosulfan 1.29E+04 ug/l 1.08E-02 lbs/day Endosulfan sulfate 1.29E+04 ug/l 1.08E-02 lbs/day Endrin 5.24E+03 ug/l 4.37E-03 lbs/day Endrin aldehyde 5.24E+03 ug/l 4.37E-03 lbs/day Heptachlor 1.36E+00 ug/l 1.13E-06 lbs/day Heptachlor epoxide PCB's PCB 1242 (Arochlor 1242)2.91E-01 ug/l 2.43E-07 lbs/day PCB-1254 (Arochlor 1254)2.91E-01 ug/l 2.43E-07 lbs/day PCB-1221 (Arochlor 1221)2.91E-01 ug/l 2.43E-07 lbs/day PCB-1232 (Arochlor 1232)2.91E-01 ug/l 2.43E-07 lbs/day PCB-1248 (Arochlor 1248)2.91E-01 ug/l 2.43E-07 lbs/day PCB-1260 (Arochlor 1260)2.91E-01 ug/l 2.43E-07 lbs/day PCB-1016 (Arochlor 1016)2.91E-01 ug/l 2.43E-07 lbs/day Pesticide Toxaphene 4.85E+00 ug/l 4.04E-06 lbs/day Metals Antimony ug/l lbs/day Arsenic ug/l lbs/day Asbestos ug/l lbs/day Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (III) Chromium (VI) Copper ug/l lbs/day Cyanide ug/l lbs/day Lead Mercury ug/l lbs/day Nickel ug/l lbs/day Selenium Silver Thallium ug/l lbs/day Zinc Dioxin Dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD)9.05E-05 ug/l 7.55E-11 lbs/day Metals Effluent Limitations for Protection of All Beneficial Uses Based upon Water Quality Standards and Toxics Rule Page 14 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah Class 4 Acute Agricultural Class 3 Acute Aquatic Wildlife Acute Toxics Drinking Water Source Acute Toxics Wildlife 1C Acute Health Criteria Acute Most Stringent Class 3 Chronic Aquatic Wildlife ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l Aluminum 2417088.1 2417088.1 N/A Antimony 2.78E+07 2.78E+07 Arsenic 646512.4 1096671.6 646512.4 1223234.6 Barium Beryllium 0.0 Cadmium 64137.3 16861.3 16861.3 12298.0 Chromium (III)1.43E+07 1.43E+07 1364988.0 Chromium (VI)641373.4 38881.5 38881.55 45421.47 Copper 1287885.8 124862.1 124862.1 149075.8 Cyanide 71127.4 1.42E+09 71127.4 33618.6 Iron 3229022.0 3229022.0 Lead 641373.4 1066353.1 641373.4 78157.1 Mercury 7759.32 969.77 969.77 77.517 Nickel 3839892.3 2.97E+07 3839892.3 849144.0 Selenium 312978.2 59522.3 59522.3 19461.6 Silver 80965.4 80965.4 Thallium 40730.3 40730.3 Zinc 982423.9 982423.9 1964543.9 Boron 4848843.1 4848843.1 Sulfate 12930248.2 1.29E+07 Summary Effluent Limitations for Metals [Wasteload Allocation, TMDL] [If Acute is more stringent than Chronic, then the Chronic takes on the Acute value.] WLA Acute WLA Chronic ug/l ug/l Aluminum 2417088.1 N/A Antimony 2.78E+07 Arsenic 646512.4 1223234.6 Acute Controls Asbestos Barium Beryllium Cadmium 16861.3 12298.0 Chromium (III)1.43E+07 1364988 Chromium (VI)38881.5 45421.5 Acute Controls Copper 124862.1 149075.8 Acute Controls Cyanide 71127.4 33618.6 Iron 3229022.0 Lead 641373.4 78157.1 Mercury 969.769 77.517 Nickel 3839892.3 849144 Selenium 59522.3 19461.6 Silver 80965.4 N/A Thallium 40730.3 Zinc 982423.9 1964543.9 Acute Controls Boron 4.85E+06 Sulfate 1.29E+07 N/A at this Waterbody Page 15 Utah Division of Water Quality Salt Lake City, Utah Other Effluent Limitations are based upon R317-1. E. coli 126.0 organisms per 100 ml X. Antidegradation Considerations The Utah Antidegradation Policy allows for degradation of existing quality where it is determined that such lowering of water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are protected [R317-2-3]. It has been determined that certain chemical parameters introduced by this discharge will cause an increase of the concentration of said parameters in the receiving waters. Under no conditions will the increase in concentration be allowed to interfere with existing instream water uses. An Antidegradation Level I Review was conducted on this discharge and its effect on the receiving water. Based upon that review, it has been determined that an Antidegradation Level II Review is not required. The proposed permit is a simple renewal, with no increase in flow or concentration over that which was approved in the existing permit. XI. Colorado River Salinity Forum Considerations Discharges in the Colorado River Basin are required to have their discharge at a TDS loading of less than 1.00 tons/day unless certain exemptions apply. Refer to the Forum's Guidelines for additional information allowing for an exceedence of this value. This doesn’t apply to facilities that do not discharge to the Colorado River Basin. XII. Summary Comments The mathematical modeling and best professional judgement indicate that violations of receiving water beneficial uses with their associated water quality standards, including important down- stream segments, will not occur for the evaluated parameters of concern as discussed above if the effluent limitations indicated above are met. Page 16