DAQ-2025-000484

1

DAQC-044-25
Site ID 15513 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – CITATION OIL & GAS CORPORATION – Pineview Tank
Battery and Gas Plant

THROUGH: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Oil and Gas Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Bushman, Environmental Scientist

DATE: January 15, 2025

SUBJECT: Source: One (1) 800 hp White Superior 8G825 (ENG 1)
Contact: Ron Schultz: 281-891-1559
Location: 3604 East Chalk Creek Road, Coalville, UT
Test Contractor: Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.
Permit/AO#: DAQE-AN155130002-22, dated August 15, 2022
Action Code: TR
Subject: Review of stack test report dated January 10, 2025

On January 10, 2025, DAQ received a test report for one (1) 800 hp White Superior 8G825 (ENG 1) at
Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant in Summit County, UT. Testing was performed on December 12,
2024, to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits found in condition II.B.6.c of
DAQE-AN155130002-22 and 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZ. The calculated test results are:

Source Test Date Test
Methods Pollutants Tester Results DAQ Results Limits
ENG 1
White
Superior
8G825
SN: 270349
December
12, 2024 RM320
NOx 0.56 lbs/hr 0.56 lbs/hr 0.661 lbs/hr
CO
0.985 lbs/hr 0.985 lbs/hr 1.022 lbs/hr
140.37 ppmvd @
15% O2
140.373 ppmvd
@ 15% O2
270 ppmvd @
15% O2

DEVIATIONS: None.

CONCLUSION: The stack test report appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: The emissions from ENG 1 should be considered to have been in
compliance with the emission limits in condition II.B.6.c of
DAQE-AN155130002-22 and 40 CFR Part 63 subpart ZZZZ
during the time of testing.

ATTACHMENTS: DAQ stack test review excel spreadsheets; Citation Oil & Gas
stack test report.
Emissions
Citation Oil & Gas Corp
Pineview Compressor Station
Summit County
800 hp White Superior 8G825 ENG 1 (North); SN: 270349
Test Date: 12/12/2024
Run #1 2 3 Average
Start Time 11:03 12:05 13:06
Stop Time 12:03 13:05 14:06
Sample Duration (minutes)60 60 60
BHP Engine Load - Actual (bhp) 550 550 550 550
DS Stack Diameter (inches)10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0PAVG Average (Delta P)½ (" H2O)½0.6110 0.6360 0.6280 0.6250
CP Pitot Tube Constant (unitless)0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84
TS Stack Temperature (°F)1402 1423 1417 1414
Pbar Barometric Pressure (" Hg)23.53 23.53 23.53 23.53
Ps Stack Pressure ('' H2O)0.23 0.24 0.24 0.24
O2%vd O2 (%vd)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
CO2%vd CO2 (%vd)11.8 11.8 11.5 11.7
N2%vd N2 (%vd)88.2 88.2 88.5 88.3
dry NOX (ppmvd)139.6 183.0 193.2 171.9
dry CO (ppmvd)503.5 490.3 497.9 497.3
Run #1 2 3 Average
Bws Measured Moisture Content (%/100)0.176 0.175 0.173 0.175
Bws Saturated Moisture Content (%/100)3189.897 3337.469 3294.949 3274.105
Bws Actual Moisture Content (%/100)0.176 0.175 0.173 0.175
MD Molecular Weight Dry (lb/lb-mole)29.89 29.89 29.84 29.87
MA Molecular Weight Wet (lb/lb-mole)27.80 27.81 27.80 27.80
VS Gas Velocity (ft/sec)74.0 77.5 76.4 75.9
FACFM Gas Flow (acfm)2422 2535 2499 2485
FDSCFM Gas Flow (dscfm)445 461 457 455
FWSCFM Gas Flow (wscfm)540 559 553 551
FKWSCFH Gas Flow (kwscfh)32 34 33 33
FKWSCFM Gas Flow (kwscfm)0.540 0.559 0.553 0.551
lb/hr Gas Flow (lb/hr) 2339 2422 2395 2385
Fo Fo (unitless)1.771 1.771 1.817 1.787
wet O2 (%vw)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
wet CO2 (%vw)9.7 9.7 9.5 9.7
wet NOX (ppmvw)115.039 150.932 159.793 141.921
15 NOX (ppmvd @ 15% O2)39.397 51.652 54.526 48.525
lb/hr NOX (lb/hr)0.445 0.604 0.632 0.560 0.66
g/bhp-hr NOX (g/bhp-hr)0.367 0.498 0.522 0.462
wet CO (ppmvw) 415.052 404.473 411.921 410.482
15 CO (ppmvd @ 15% O2)142.142 138.419 140.558 140.373 270.0
lb/hr CO (lb/hr) 0.977 0.985 0.993 0.985 1.02
g/bhp-hr CO (g/bhp-hr)0.806 0.813 0.819 0.812
Permit Limits
Field Reference Method Data
Reference Method Calculations
Page 1 of 1

January 10, 2025

Ms. Alexis North Via E-Mail: [e-mail]
Office of Enforcement
US EPA Region 8
8ENT-AT
1595 Wynkoop Street
Denver, CO 80202-1129

Mr. Rik Ombach Via Website: https://utahgov.col.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3dSxf7JSzy4jwGh
Minor Source Compliance Manager
Permitting and Compliance Division
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820

RE: NESHAP ZZZZ & UDEQ DAQ ENGINE EMISSION TEST RESULTS SUBMITTAL
CITATION OIL & GAS CORP.
PINEVIEW TANK BATTERY AND GAS PLANT (PERMIT #DAQE-AN155130002-22)
SUMMIT COUNTY, UTAH

Dear Ms. North and Mr. Ombach:

Further to our NESHAP ZZZZ and UDEQ DAQ Test Notification and Protocol submittal dated October
08, 2024, Citation Oil & Gas Corp. (Citation) hereby confirms that Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc. (Oasis)
has successfully completed compliance emission testing on one (1) 800 horsepower White Superior 8G825
engine located at Citation’s Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant near Coalville in Summit County, Utah.

On December 12, 2024, compliance emission testing was conducted on ENG-1 (North) and the average
NOX and CO levels recorded were found to comply with the emission levels stipulated by the permit and
EPA 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ. A copy of the test report is included in Attachment A. Additionally, a copy
of the Notice of Intent/Test Protocol is included as Attachment B.

As stated in the Source Test Notification and Protocol Submission, two (2) additional 800 hp White
Superior compressor engines (ENG 2 and Recip (South)) are located as this site but are currently out of
service or are inoperable at this time. Therefore, emission testing for these two enignes was not performed.
If Citation decides to bring these engines back into service, performance testing will be conducted prior to
operation.

Per the permit and Subpart ZZZZ, subsequent engine testing/compliance demonstrations will be conducted
on an annual basis. However, as mentioned in previous correspondence, Citation continues to maintain that
these three (3) engines meet the definition of “Remote Stationary RICE” and are not subject to performance
test requirements set forth in Subpart ZZZZ.

Page 2 of 2
Engine Emission Test Results
Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant
January 10, 2025

If you have any questions or require further information, please contact me at [phone] or
via e-mail at [e-mail]
Very truly yours,
RJ Redweik
Robert J. Redweik
VP – EHS and Regulatory

Attachments:
A – Test Report
B – Notice of Intent and Test Protocol
C - Correspondence

cc: Mr. Rik Ombach, Utah Division of Air Quality, [e-mail]
Ms. Alexis North, EPA Region 8, [e-mail]

ATTACHMENT A
Test Report

Source Test Report
For
Citation Oil & Gas Corporation
Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant
Summit County, Utah

Test Date: December 12, 2024
Report Date: January 2, 2025

Approval Order: DAQE-AN155130002-22
Engine: White Superior 8G825
SN: 270349
Unit ID: ENG1 (North)

Prepared By:

Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.
2730 Commercial Way
Rock Springs, WY 82901

January 2, 2025

Mr. Ron Schultz
Citation Oil & Gas Corporation
14077 Cutten Road
Houston, TX 77069

Dear Mr. Schultz:

Re: Engine Emission Testing For Citation Oil & Gas Corporation, Pineview Tank
Battery and Gas Plant, Unit ENG1 (North), Approval Order DAQE-
AN155130002-22.

An air emissions test program was conducted on a White Superior 8G825 engine, operated by
Citation Oil & Gas Corporation and designated as Unit ENG1 (North), located at the
Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant in Summit County, Utah. The purpose of the testing
was to demonstrate ongoing compliance with the emissions limits contained in Approval
Order DAQE-AN155130002-22 and EPA 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ, for oxides of nitrogen
(NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO).

Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc. conducted the testing on December 12, 2024.

Approval Oder #DAQE-AN155130002-22 and EPA 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ
Emission Levels

The average recorded levels were found to comply with emission levels stipulated in the
permit, as shown in the attached report and summarized below.

Emission
Unit
Avg NOx Permit
NOx
Avg CO Permit
CO
lbs/hr 0.56 0.661 0.985 1.022
ppmvd@15%
O2
48.53 -- 140.37 270

Catalyst Parameters (Averaged Over 3 Test Runs)

Inlet Temp (deg F) DP (in H2O)
1029 N/A

Engine Load (Averaged Over 3 Test Runs)

Rated BHP Operating
BHP
% Load
800 550.0 68.8

Testing Protocol

The attached report was generated using an extractive FTIR system using methodologies as
required by and in accordance with EPA 40 CFR 60(A) Methods 1-3 and EPA 40 CFR
63(A), Method 320, as well as EPA 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ as outlined in the submitted
Source Test Protocol.

Quality Assurance

Oasis has performed a full review of the raw data and calculated results in this report. Any
errors we have encountered have been listed in the body of this report. After performing the
review, we are confident that this engine has met all requirements.

If you have any questions or require further information, please contact the undersigned at
[phone].

Yours truly,
Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.

_________________________ _______________________
Charles A. Chapman Crystal Leonard
Manager of Technical Services Senior EHS Specialist

_________________________

Christopher N. Knott, P.Eng.
Director, Engineering and Operations

SOURCE EMISSION TEST REPORT

UDEQ Approval Order #DAQE-AN155130002-22

Test Performed By: Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.

Test Company Contact: Chris Knott
2730 Commercial Way
Rock Springs, WY 82901
307.382.3297

Owner/Operator: Citation Oil & Gas Corporation

Owner/Operator Contact: Mr. Ron Schultz

Facility Name: Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant
UTM Coordinates: 487,342 m Easting, 4,531,757, m
Northing, UTM Zone 12
Summit County, Utah

Emission Source: White Superior 8G825

Unit: ENG1 (North)

Date of Test: December 12, 2024

Date of Report: January 2, 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1
2.1 Stack Sampling Location ..................................................................................................... 2
3.1 Discussion of NOx and CO Test Results.............................................................................. 4
3.1.1 Source Test 1 ............................................................................................................................................ 4
3.1.2 Source Test 2 ............................................................................................................................................ 4
3.1.3 Source Test 3 ............................................................................................................................................ 4
4.1 Stack Sampling Methods and Procedures ............................................................................ 5
4.2 Equipment Utilization .......................................................................................................... 6
4.3 Process Parameters............................................................................................................... 7
5.1 Quality Assurance ................................................................................................................ 8

List of Tables and Figures

Figure 1 - Sample Port Location ............................................................................................................................. 2
Figure 2 - Sampling Train Schematic – Method 320 .............................................................................................. 6

Table 1 – Insertion Depths of Traverse Points for Stratification Test .................................................................... 2
Table 2 - Location of Traverse Points in Circular Stacks………………………………………………………….3
Table 3 - Test Matrix………………………………………………………………………………………………5
Table 4 - Concentrations and Interference………………………………………………………………………...6

APPENDIX A: NOx and CO Test Data

APPENDIX B: Quality Assurance/Calibration Data

APPENDIX C: Load Approximation

APPENDIX D: Example Calculations and Summary

APPENDIX E: Field Notes

1

1.1 Introduction

An air emissions test program was conducted on a White Superior 8G825 engine, operated by
Citation Oil & Gas Corporation and designated as Unit ENG1 (North), located at the
Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant in Summit County, Utah. The purpose of the testing
was to demonstrate ongoing compliance with the emissions limits contained in Approval
Order DAQE-AN155130002-22 and EPA 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ, for oxides of nitrogen
(NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO).

The facility is located at 3604 East Chalk Creek Road in Coalville, in Summit County, Utah.
UTM Coordinates: 487,342 m Easting, 4,531,757 m Northing, UTM Zone 12

Three one hour test runs were performed on December 12, 2024 to analyze NOx and CO
emission levels. Test runs were performed according to methodologies outlined by EPA 40
CFR 60(A) Methods 1-3, EPA 40 CFR (A), Method 320, as well as EPA 40 CFR 63, Subpart
ZZZZ. Each one hour test run consisted of 60 readings taken at one minute intervals.

Process parameters were recorded during each test run in order to determine the load.
Parameters include the engine RPM and intake manifold pressure.
The following key personnel were present during testing:

David Martinez, OEC
Jeremy, Citation Oil & Gas Corporation

2

2.1 Stack Sampling Location

The facility is located at 3604 East Chalk Creek Road in Coalville, in Summit County, Utah.
UTM Coordinates: 487,342 m Easting, 4,531,757 m Northing, UTM Zone 12

Testing was conducted on the White Superior 8G825 engine. The sampling port for moisture,
NOx and CO measurements was approximately 2.4 pipe diameters (24”) downstream from
the nearest flow disturbance (Distance B) and 0.5 pipe diameters (5”) upstream from the
nearest disturbance (Distance A), as seen in Figure 1. The stack sampling location was placed
at approximately 50% insertion depth based on an O2 stratification check which demonstrated
a non-stratified flow regime. The stratification was conducted according to EPA 40 CFR
75(A), §6.5.6.1 using 3 traverse points determined according to Table 1 below. In accordance
with EPA 40 CFR 60(A), Method 1, a total of 16 traverse insertion depths (8 traverse points
through each of the 2 ports) were determined according to Table 2 below in order to conduct
Method 2.

Figure 1 - Sample Port Location

Table 1 – Insertion Depths of Traverse Points for Stratification Test

Traverse Point Insertion Depth (Percent of Stack Diameter)
1 16.7
2 50.0
3 83.3

10"
A
B
3

Table 2 – Location of Traverse Points in Circular Stacks

4

3.1 Discussion of NOx and CO Test Results

Three, one hour test runs were performed on December 12, 2024 to analyze exhaust NOx and
CO emission levels to demonstrate ongoing compliance with the emissions limits contained
in the Approval Order #DAQE-AN155130002-22. Testing for NOx and CO were run
concurrently with one another. Each test was performed at the maximum achievable load.
Measured emissions were below permitted limits. Please refer to the Appendices for a listing
of all raw data, calibration error response and calculations performed per EPA 40 CFR 60(A)
requirements.

3.1.1 Source Test 1: White Superior 8G825, NOx and CO

The first test was performed from 11:03 to 12:03 for NOx and CO.

Based on operating parameters recorded during testing, the load was approximated at
550.0 bhp, and the average NOx and CO levels were found to be 0.44 lbs/hr and
0.977 lbs/hr respectively, below limitations.

3.1.2 Source Test 2: White Superior 8G825, NOx and CO

The second test was performed from 12:05 to 13:04 for NOx and CO.

Based on operating parameters recorded during testing, the load was approximated at
550.0 bhp, and the average NOx and CO levels were found to be 0.60 lbs/hr and
0.985 lbs/hr respectively, below limitations.

3.1.3 Source Test 3: White Superior 8G825, NOx and CO

The third test was performed from 13:06 to 14:05 for NOx and CO.

Based on operating parameters recorded during testing, the load was approximated at
550.0 bhp, and the average NOx and CO levels were found to be 0.63 lbs/hr and
0.993 lbs/hr respectively, below limitations.

Test
Run
NOx
(ppmvd)
NOx
(lbs/hr)
CO
(ppmvd)
CO
(lbs/hr)
O2
(%)
1 139.56 0.44 503.52 0.977 0.0
Test
Run
NOx
(ppmvd)
NOx
(lbs/hr)
CO
(ppmvd)
CO
(lbs/hr)
O2
(%)
2 182.97 0.60 490.33 0.985 0.0
Test
Run
NOx
(ppmvd)
NOx
(lbs/hr)
CO
(ppmvd)
CO
(lbs/hr)
O2
(%)
3 193.15 0.63 497.91 0.993 0.0
5

4.1 Stack Sampling Methods and Procedures

Testing followed EPA 40 CFR 60(A) Methods 1-3 & EPA 40 CFR 63(A), Method 320,
methodologies per our standard protocol, with no exceptions.

Table 3 - Test Matrix

Method Title Parameter Reference
EPA 40 CFR 60
Appendix A, Method
1
Sample and Velocity
Traverses for
Stationary Sources
Sampling Point
Determination
https://www.epa.gov/
sites/production/files/
2017-
08/documents/metho
d_1_3.pdf
EPA 40 CFR 60
Appendix A, Method
2
Determination of
Stack Gas Velocity
and Volumetric
Flow Rate
Exhaust Effluent
Flow
https://www.epa.gov/
sites/production/files/
2017-
08/documents/metho
d_2.pdf
EPA 40 CFR 60
Appendix A, Method
3
Gas Analysis for
the Determination
of Dry Molecular
Weight
O2, Dry
Volumetric Flow
Rate
https://www.epa.gov/
sites/production/files/
2017-
08/documents/metho
d_3.pdf
EPA 40 CFR 63(A),
Method 320

Vapor Phase Organic
and Inorganic
Emissions by
Extractive FTIR
Nitrogen Oxides,
Carbon Dioxide
https://www.epa.gov/
sites/production/files/
2019-
06/documents/metho
d_320.pdf
United States. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “EMC Promulgated Test Methods.” Air
Emission Measurement Center (EMC). 9 July 2024. Web. 2 January 2025.
<https://www.epa.gov/emc/emc-promulgated-test-methods>.

6

4.2 Equipment Utilization

The following equipment was used during the tests performed at this facility in conjunction
with procedures outlined by EPA 40 CFR 60(A) Methods 1-3, EPA 40 CFR 63(A), Method
320, as well as EPA 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ.

• (1) MKS MultiGas 2030 FTIR Continuous Gas Analyzer (0.210 L/min sample flow, 0.014
atmosphere sample pressure, 1 atmosphere cell pressure, 191°C cell temperature)
• (1) Laptop Computer for the FTIR Analyzer using MKS MG2000 Software
• (1) 75ft or 100ft Heated Teflon Line w/ Heated Sample Probe and Spike Bypass Line
• S-Type Pitot Tube c/w 20 ft. Heated Sample Line (coefficient 0.84)
• (1) Fyrite O2/CO2 Analyzer
• (5) EPA Protocol G1 Calibration Gas (NOx, CO, C3H8, C2H4 and NO2)

The MKS Multigas 2030 FTIR Analyzer operated with a spectral resolution of 0.5 cm-1 and a
scan time of 30 seconds. The FTIR spectrometer utilizes a multi-pass gas cell with a 5.11
meter effective pathlength.

Figure 2 - Sampling Train Schematic – Method 320

7

Table 4 - Concentrations and Interference

The MKS 2030 software provides a Natural Gas Method that is designed to minimize all
expected interferences by removing the regions in the quant region where they are most
absorbed (i.e. picket fence approach). So, for example, all the water peaks that are greater
than about 0.1 abs are removed from the quant region. Since the spectral noise measured
(sample spectrum) is in the range of 0.001 absorbance, it is desirable to have any error within
this range. The MKS software will match the water calibration spectrum to the sample
spectrum at any 1 point in the spectrum to about 1% precision. So, 1% of 0.1 absorbance is
0.001 abs. This is why any peaks greater than this for interfering compounds are usually
excluded so they do not interfere. To summarize, the MKS software and the method are
designed to minimize any interferences by removing their largest interfering absorptions.

4.3 Process Parameters

The engine operating parameters were used in order to determine the load. Parameters
include the engine RPM and intake manifold pressure. Results are provided in Appendix C.

8

5.1 Quality Assurance

The MKS Multigas 2030 FTIR Analyzer was used to measure NOx and CO on a dry basis. A
pre Direct and System calibration measurement was made on compounds of NOx, CO, C3H8
and C2H4. In addition, post System calibrations were made on compounds of NOx, CO, C3H8
and C2H4. Compounds of CO2 and C3H8 were measured for the quality assurance spiking
requirements of Method 320. Levels for calibrations and zeroes must be within +/- 5% of the
certified calibration gas or response to zero gas, respectively.

CTS procedures were followed according to EPA requirements for both pre and post testing.
Similarly, QA spiking procedures were followed. Analysis of the CO2 exhaust effluent was
used to determine the dilution factor. Steady levels of the CO2 were observed and a sufficient
duration of time was allowed to elapse for a representative average.

The calibration gas was spiked into the effluent stream using a bypass line at approximately
10% of the sampling rate. The dilution factor was obtained from observation of the stack CO2
behavior using the following equation:

CO2AVG – CO2SPIKE
DF = ------------------------
CO2 AVG

Where: CO2AVG = The average undiluted CO2 stack gas concentration of spike measurements
CO2SPIKE = The average diluted CO2 stack gas concentration when spiked

The sample recovery was then obtained from the following equation:

% REC = (Spike MEAS – Stack MEAS)* (1 – DF)
---------------------------------------------------------
CS * DF

Where: Spike MEAS = The average diluted stack gas concentration when spiked
Stack MEAS = The average undiluted stack gas concentration
DF = Dilution factor
CS = Certified concentration of calibration standards

The Sample Recovery average level for C3H8 was found to be 78.4%, which was within the
allowable tolerance of Method 320 (70% to 130%). A summary of all spiking
procedures/results can be found in Appendix B.

APPENDIX A

NO Dry
(ppm)
NO2 Dry
(ppm)
NOx Dry
(ppm)
CO Dry
(ppm)
H2O% (High)
191C
Time
1 87.401713 0.61647 88.018183 625.653769 17.342178 11:03:59 12/12/2024
2 79.142963 0.553019 79.695982 636.089792 17.923467 11:04:59 12/12/2024
3 81.94574 0.59054 82.53628 587.329007 17.390889 11:05:59 12/12/2024
4 84.908389 0.483403 85.391792 603.799633 15.362394 11:07:00 12/12/2024
5 88.658009 1.243034 89.901043 579.3689 22.138662 11:08:00 12/12/2024
6 83.419678 0.514556 83.934234 634.293011 16.784432 11:09:00 12/12/2024
7 87.072234 0.742805 87.815039 624.178483 18.594225 11:10:00 12/12/2024
8 83.047963 0.43755 83.485513 624.229952 16.699095 11:11:00 12/12/2024
9 96.066612 0.635095 96.701707 548.539038 17.424922 11:12:00 12/12/2024
10 109.889417 0.512758 110.402175 524.617388 17.365844 11:13:00 12/12/2024
11 114.414659 0.602229 115.016888 511.297393 19.269637 11:14:01 12/12/2024
12 125.514223 0.736321 126.250544 523.326659 20.169493 11:15:01 12/12/2024
13 111.473715 0.64976 112.123475 562.338102 18.761487 11:16:01 12/12/2024
14 111.931193 0.401564 112.332757 570.299638 15.520334 11:17:01 12/12/2024
15 104.744597 0.478738 105.223335 604.618302 15.688259 11:18:01 12/12/2024
16 97.05007 1.031806 98.081876 623.169501 20.588357 11:19:01 12/12/2024
17 97.563423 0.498485 98.061908 610.432578 17.303783 11:20:02 12/12/2024
18 113.654798 0.404906 114.059704 534.513052 14.822892 11:21:02 12/12/2024
19 109.431005 0.488229 109.919234 580.917242 15.693902 11:22:02 12/12/2024
20 119.255945 0.976742 120.232687 515.05017 19.632833 11:23:02 12/12/2024
21 127.223746 0.541264 127.76501 507.259109 18.285983 11:24:02 12/12/2024
22 118.015288 0.726439 118.741727 541.314865 20.460913 11:25:02 12/12/2024
23 116.30901 0.666197 116.975207 562.484699 18.576003 11:26:02 12/12/2024
24 125.126951 0.501089 125.62804 515.589983 17.900744 11:27:02 12/12/2024
25 138.170568 0.593667 138.764235 472.745248 19.022525 11:28:03 12/12/2024
26 146.088566 0.538675 146.627241 488.875206 17.816173 11:29:03 12/12/2024
27 129.006561 0.426344 129.432905 532.11389 15.691651 11:30:03 12/12/2024
28 124.441128 0.480257 124.921385 566.553246 19.561183 11:31:03 12/12/2024
29 129.036372 1.243279 130.279651 513.434983 20.753065 11:32:03 12/12/2024
30 146.603866 0.64334 147.247206 468.882403 18.166494 11:33:03 12/12/2024
31 165.467627 0.513247 165.980874 413.877135 15.852755 11:34:09 12/12/2024
32 150.308039 0.541758 150.849797 469.743069 17.212518 11:35:09 12/12/2024
33 162.156905 0.537173 162.694078 440.669701 15.715716 11:36:09 12/12/2024
34 159.216986 0.651226 159.868212 463.924425 18.153513 11:37:10 12/12/2024
35 171.1723 0.662929 171.835229 401.7125 18.505061 11:38:10 12/12/2024
36 154.954537 0.502666 155.457203 473.150773 16.039907 11:39:10 12/12/2024
37 152.946292 0.531663 153.477955 477.420784 15.85295 11:40:10 12/12/2024
38 158.273622 0.534777 158.808399 462.718032 16.03142 11:41:10 12/12/2024
39 151.974665 0.48035 152.455015 471.405371 17.547955 11:42:10 12/12/2024
40 169.324465 0.57554 169.900005 413.68108 17.932268 11:43:11 12/12/2024
41 156.816909 0.472763 157.289672 462.24517 16.433373 11:44:11 12/12/2024
42 159.875477 0.399314 160.274791 469.42875 15.364708 11:45:11 12/12/2024
43 166.121108 0.565571 166.686679 423.930092 18.188558 11:46:11 12/12/2024
44 148.436482 0.548995 148.985477 496.632918 18.159774 11:47:11 12/12/2024
45 172.884013 0.524689 173.408702 402.009715 16.301526 11:48:11 12/12/2024
46 158.12878 0.675754 158.804534 464.077106 17.152838 11:49:11 12/12/2024
47 160.20203 0.649165 160.851195 464.703766 18.101533 11:50:12 12/12/2024
48 149.075455 0.541912 149.617367 526.467309 15.360136 11:51:12 12/12/2024
49 173.754705 0.396799 174.151504 425.332064 16.264107 11:52:12 12/12/2024
50 169.049703 0.626773 169.676476 436.523635 18.075323 11:53:12 12/12/2024
51 163.460591 0.894891 164.355482 476.570403 20.150899 11:54:12 12/12/2024
52 172.710301 0.656952 173.367253 456.354083 17.71261 11:55:12 12/12/2024
53 175.498767 0.465802 175.964569 459.09392 15.423962 11:56:12 12/12/2024
54 188.610906 0.701733 189.312639 388.524302 15.618735 11:57:13 12/12/2024
55 181.718006 0.705859 182.423865 447.624817 18.46071 11:58:13 12/12/2024
56 192.916026 0.670237 193.586263 400.971391 17.730618 11:59:13 12/12/2024
57 197.754536 0.83017 198.584706 402.670159 19.944694 12:00:13 12/12/2024
58 208.929954 0.552146 209.4821 368.375944 16.273085 12:01:13 12/12/2024
59 187.412985 0.644169 188.057154 441.035825 18.14142 12:02:13 12/12/2024
60 171.485794 0.491404 171.977198 517.185119 15.916076 12:03:14 12/12/2024
AVG 138.95 0.61 139.56 503.52 17.57
ppm@15% O2 39.40 142.14
NOx
(g/bhp-hr)
NOx
(lbs/hr)
CO
(g/bhp-hr)
CO
(lbs/hr)
0.37 0.44 0.81 0.98
Calculated Emission Levels
ENG1 (North)
FTIR Measurements
Citation Oil & Gas Corporation
Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant
Run 1
Record Date
EPA REFERENCE METHOD 1 EPA REFERENCE METHOD 2
Stack Diameter 10 Inches Kp=85.49 ft/sec Cp=0.84
Traverse Points 16 Port Point Insertion Depth dP Ts Stat P sqrt dP
Ports 2 (inches)(in h2O)(deg R)(in H2O)
EPA REFERENCE METHOD 3 A 1 0.50 0.33 1862 0.23 0.574
Average O2 0.0 (% dry)A 2 1.05 0.34 0.583
Average CO2 11.8 (% dry)A 3 1.94 0.36 0.600
Average N2 + CO 88.2 (% dry)A 4 3.23 0.40 0.632
Dry Molecular Weight 29.89 lb/lbmol A 5 6.77 0.41 0.640
Wet Molecular Weight 27.80 lb/lbmol A 6 8.06 0.38 0.616
ASTM D6348-03 / EPA REFERENCE METHOD 320 A 7 8.95 0.35 0.592
Barometric Pressure 23.53 in Hg A 8 9.50 0.35 0.592
Moisture Content 17.57 %A 9
ASTM D6348-03 / EPA REFERENCE METHOD 320 A 10
Average Analyzer NOx Level 139.56 ppm A 11
Calculated NOx Mass Output 0.44 lbs/hr A 12
Calculated NOx Output 0.37 g/bhp-hr A 13
ASTM D6348-03 / EPA REFERENCE METHOD 320 A 14
Average Analyzer CO Level 503.52 ppm A 15
Calculated CO Mass Output 0.98 lbs/hr A 16
Calculated CO Output 0.81 g/bhp-hr B 1 0.50 0.33 1862 0.23 0.574
LOAD APPROXIMATION B 2 1.05 0.35 0.592
Estimated Engine Load 550.0 BHP B 3 1.94 0.39 0.624
B 4 3.23 0.42 0.648
B 5 6.77 0.44 0.663
B 6 8.06 0.40 0.632
B 7 8.95 0.37 0.608
B 8 9.50 0.36 0.600
B 9
B 10
B 11
B 12
B 13
B 14
B 15
B 16
Averages 0.4 1862 0.2 0.611
Average Stack Gas Velocity 73.98 ft/sec
Average Dry Flowrate 445.32 dscfm
TEST RUN # 1
NO Dry
(ppm)
NO2 Dry
(ppm)
NOx Dry
(ppm)
CO Dry
(ppm)
H2O% (High)
191C
Time
1 166.784264 1.080402 167.864666 496.703859 19.655373 12:05:14 12/12/2024
2 154.408055 0.839846 155.247901 537.564244 18.205734 12:06:14 12/12/2024
3 159.417766 0.442086 159.859852 513.508432 16.246754 12:07:14 12/12/2024
4 152.628494 0.58959 153.218084 540.474827 17.468798 12:08:14 12/12/2024
5 161.763059 0.636916 162.399975 517.178865 16.650083 12:09:14 12/12/2024
6 157.553614 0.500357 158.053971 520.415138 15.661125 12:10:15 12/12/2024
7 172.365606 0.822858 173.188464 439.055546 20.698761 12:11:15 12/12/2024
8 171.493667 0.629023 172.12269 496.047627 18.540483 12:12:15 12/12/2024
9 197.222477 0.53365 197.756127 413.231544 16.593755 12:13:15 12/12/2024
10 195.376824 0.646886 196.02371 429.027586 16.419192 12:14:15 12/12/2024
11 176.437019 0.551917 176.988936 505.040622 17.17886 12:15:15 12/12/2024
12 184.259265 0.494636 184.753901 475.800433 16.751124 12:16:15 12/12/2024
13 175.79884 0.549494 176.348334 505.588368 17.62589 12:17:16 12/12/2024
14 186.335192 0.674768 187.00996 439.777912 17.591177 12:18:16 12/12/2024
15 178.567786 0.646252 179.214038 481.990759 18.230351 12:19:16 12/12/2024
16 201.305131 0.565579 201.87071 408.830086 17.238672 12:20:16 12/12/2024
17 177.883657 0.53519 178.418847 506.923097 16.984874 12:21:16 12/12/2024
18 195.051088 0.601467 195.652555 429.422609 17.553129 12:22:16 12/12/2024
19 178.549686 0.57414 179.123826 485.655434 16.415579 12:23:17 12/12/2024
20 182.344248 0.580105 182.924353 468.067765 16.004627 12:24:17 12/12/2024
21 177.920544 0.6019 178.522444 487.238015 18.784863 12:25:17 12/12/2024
22 180.505016 0.686916 181.191932 492.688906 17.997335 12:26:17 12/12/2024
23 176.9645 0.554508 177.519008 509.479431 18.013041 12:27:17 12/12/2024
24 196.454889 0.672768 197.127657 423.834002 18.30712 12:28:17 12/12/2024
25 203.73346 0.583404 204.316864 405.76268 18.626737 12:29:18 12/12/2024
26 180.422169 0.669095 181.091264 508.639807 18.095181 12:30:17 12/12/2024
27 188.821502 0.660477 189.481979 443.728544 18.027534 12:31:18 12/12/2024
28 175.472607 0.60637 176.078977 542.475768 16.477489 12:32:18 12/12/2024
29 188.716677 0.497387 189.214064 458.497166 15.63361 12:33:18 12/12/2024
30 173.327058 0.566818 173.893876 524.210883 16.383851 12:34:18 12/12/2024
31 206.522657 0.584015 207.106672 410.516686 16.38598 12:35:18 12/12/2024
32 183.245615 0.643236 183.888851 495.294879 19.0411 12:36:19 12/12/2024
33 185.128776 0.637623 185.766399 497.691476 18.075336 12:37:18 12/12/2024
34 185.675892 0.453328 186.12922 481.379887 17.739914 12:38:19 12/12/2024
35 197.669899 0.711317 198.381216 436.055136 18.862736 12:39:19 12/12/2024
36 179.701169 0.608406 180.309575 529.448198 16.418651 12:40:19 12/12/2024
37 192.31148 0.519635 192.831115 463.257657 15.898296 12:41:19 12/12/2024
38 173.244763 0.567755 173.812518 540.755137 17.475417 12:42:19 12/12/2024
39 181.243315 0.701612 181.944927 503.977521 18.073402 12:43:20 12/12/2024
40 204.446868 0.568212 205.01508 421.965393 17.293517 12:44:19 12/12/2024
41 184.631241 0.637575 185.268816 513.160024 17.061861 12:45:20 12/12/2024
42 201.087403 0.479965 201.567368 440.485463 15.826305 12:46:20 12/12/2024
43 188.202741 0.557817 188.760558 498.018443 17.457102 12:47:20 12/12/2024
44 190.751937 1.081406 191.833343 492.983458 22.820682 12:48:20 12/12/2024
45 185.092021 0.63981 185.731831 495.379567 18.049481 12:49:20 12/12/2024
46 179.262568 0.606417 179.868985 534.914831 17.24512 12:50:21 12/12/2024
47 188.162436 0.525243 188.687679 477.902331 17.013092 12:51:20 12/12/2024
48 176.838167 0.493374 177.331541 549.11913 16.676341 12:52:21 12/12/2024
49 181.94502 0.637789 182.582809 518.507441 17.834314 12:53:21 12/12/2024
50 172.860801 0.608586 173.469387 530.244336 18.311361 12:54:21 12/12/2024
51 169.301732 0.531165 169.832897 599.160797 16.690335 12:55:21 12/12/2024
52 175.838529 0.971211 176.80974 530.216581 19.2937 12:56:21 12/12/2024
53 188.460073 0.543869 189.003942 478.803337 15.919493 12:57:21 12/12/2024
54 189.019378 0.588921 189.608299 502.60809 15.791116 12:58:21 12/12/2024
55 210.395449 0.575371 210.97082 425.964193 16.438239 12:59:22 12/12/2024
56 198.312003 1.091895 199.403898 464.489971 21.152647 13:00:22 12/12/2024
57 184.695903 0.569496 185.265399 541.390746 16.298444 13:01:22 12/12/2024
58 179.600298 0.642707 180.243005 544.118028 16.323701 13:02:22 12/12/2024
59 169.893668 0.503622 170.39729 588.07361 17.77638 13:03:22 12/12/2024
60 169.111183 0.658816 169.769999 507.312045 17.079477 13:04:22 12/12/2024
AVG 182.34 0.63 182.97 490.33 17.51
ppm@15% O2 51.65 138.42
NOx
(g/bhp-hr)
NOx
(lbs/hr)
CO
(g/bhp-hr)
CO
(lbs/hr)
0.50 0.60 0.81 0.99
Calculated Emission Levels
Record Date
Citation Oil & Gas Corporation
Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant
Run 2
ENG1 (North)
FTIR Measurements
EPA REFERENCE METHOD 1 EPA REFERENCE METHOD 2
Stack Diameter 10 Inches Kp=85.49 ft/sec Cp=0.84
Traverse Points 16 Port Point Insertion Depth dP Ts Stat P sqrt dP
Ports 2 (inches)(in h2O)(deg R)(in H2O)
EPA REFERENCE METHOD 3 A 1 0.50 0.36 1883 0.24 0.600
Average O2 0.0 (% dry)A 2 1.05 0.38 0.616
Average CO2 11.8 (% dry)A 3 1.94 0.41 0.640
Average N2 + CO 88.2 (% dry)A 4 3.23 0.45 0.671
Dry Molecular Weight 29.89 lb/lbmol A 5 6.77 0.44 0.663
Wet Molecular Weight 27.81 lb/lbmol A 6 8.06 0.42 0.648
ASTM D6348-03 / EPA REFERENCE METHOD 320 A 7 8.95 0.39 0.624
Barometric Pressure 23.53 in Hg A 8 9.50 0.37 0.608
Moisture Content 17.51 %A 9
ASTM D6348-03 / EPA REFERENCE METHOD 320 A 10
Average Analyzer NOx Level 182.97 ppm A 11
Calculated NOx Mass Output 0.60 lbs/hr A 12
Calculated NOx Output 0.50 g/bhp-hr A 13
ASTM D6348-03 / EPA REFERENCE METHOD 320 A 14
Average Analyzer CO Level 490.33 ppm A 15
Calculated CO Mass Output 0.99 lbs/hr A 16
Calculated CO Output 0.81 g/bhp-hr B 1 0.50 0.37 1883 0.24 0.608
LOAD APPROXIMATION B 2 1.05 0.38 0.616
Estimated Engine Load 550.0 BHP B 3 1.94 0.41 0.640
B 4 3.23 0.46 0.678
B 5 6.77 0.45 0.671
B 6 8.06 0.42 0.648
B 7 8.95 0.40 0.632
B 8 9.50 0.37 0.608
B 9
B 10
B 11
B 12
B 13
B 14
B 15
B 16
Averages 0.4 1883 0.2 0.636
Average Stack Gas Velocity 77.44 ft/sec
Average Dry Flowrate 461.36 dscfm
TEST RUN # 2
NO Dry
(ppm)
NO2 Dry
(ppm)
NOx Dry
(ppm)
CO Dry
(ppm)
H2O% (High)
191C
Time
1 165.804787 0.347825 166.152612 551.589145 15.905224 13:06:23 12/12/2024
2 145.140905 0.76184 145.902745 692.959474 22.453867 13:07:23 12/12/2024
3 151.726524 0.527869 152.254393 624.149616 16.27547 13:08:23 12/12/2024
4 158.6932 0.640081 159.333281 550.883826 17.544585 13:09:23 12/12/2024
5 167.628295 0.531357 168.159652 518.737073 15.534754 13:10:23 12/12/2024
6 186.170678 0.73998 186.910658 453.498785 17.620728 13:11:23 12/12/2024
7 166.922164 0.584194 167.506358 592.089097 15.463434 13:12:23 12/12/2024
8 156.503577 0.628378 157.131955 646.762463 18.604455 13:13:24 12/12/2024
9 164.753166 0.660932 165.414098 565.800869 18.292507 13:14:24 12/12/2024
10 156.958558 0.512242 157.4708 625.336634 16.620698 13:15:24 12/12/2024
11 171.76047 0.433569 172.194039 518.254034 14.866242 13:16:24 12/12/2024
12 168.282148 0.640451 168.922599 541.662974 16.243669 13:17:24 12/12/2024
13 178.900388 0.505751 179.406139 501.838972 16.92494 13:18:24 12/12/2024
14 196.840315 0.562215 197.40253 422.598311 15.641573 13:19:24 12/12/2024
15 219.798285 1.094815 220.8931 351.666582 19.771445 13:20:25 12/12/2024
16 194.973242 0.635531 195.608773 479.909157 15.304578 13:21:25 12/12/2024
17 202.535429 0.778208 203.313637 449.678034 18.480279 13:22:25 12/12/2024
18 207.961793 0.568065 208.529858 428.335396 16.47296 13:23:25 12/12/2024
19 198.090975 0.536026 198.627001 451.644308 16.983585 13:24:25 12/12/2024
20 224.248593 0.64786 224.896453 375.283883 17.544936 13:25:25 12/12/2024
21 239.612324 0.602556 240.21488 365.818966 16.531865 13:26:25 12/12/2024
22 218.869528 0.667636 219.537164 412.701494 19.17254 13:27:26 12/12/2024
23 203.86668 0.684912 204.551592 456.635161 16.430951 13:28:26 12/12/2024
24 206.218401 0.552895 206.771296 432.339248 16.102717 13:29:26 12/12/2024
25 229.612457 0.695927 230.308384 342.895961 18.735824 13:30:26 12/12/2024
26 222.56024 0.649003 223.209243 381.353812 18.104149 13:31:26 12/12/2024
27 236.769253 0.629107 237.39836 351.537916 15.613646 13:32:26 12/12/2024
28 213.382198 0.531587 213.913785 433.782344 16.530757 13:33:26 12/12/2024
29 218.18707 0.698286 218.885356 424.869117 18.413101 13:34:27 12/12/2024
30 220.105407 0.64208 220.747487 425.126258 16.880245 13:35:27 12/12/2024
31 204.458315 0.708234 205.166549 470.055661 18.904383 13:36:27 12/12/2024
32 201.685464 0.661653 202.347117 475.97705 19.96538 13:37:27 12/12/2024
33 194.416992 0.578454 194.995446 520.02997 15.57382 13:38:27 12/12/2024
34 184.059579 0.439055 184.498634 541.754329 15.549303 13:39:28 12/12/2024
35 188.016907 0.486109 188.503016 523.944264 15.530577 13:40:28 12/12/2024
36 197.745033 0.450402 198.195435 499.368796 16.231586 13:41:28 12/12/2024
37 191.444969 0.564964 192.009933 488.030692 18.543307 13:42:28 12/12/2024
38 198.314018 0.478417 198.792435 476.93559 16.204904 13:43:28 12/12/2024
39 205.157717 0.550921 205.708638 449.74198 17.90441 13:44:28 12/12/2024
40 207.951299 0.889723 208.841022 446.574415 19.404988 13:45:28 12/12/2024
41 204.452423 0.48951 204.941933 476.431593 16.108817 13:46:28 12/12/2024
42 212.173225 0.55398 212.727205 453.607713 16.144799 13:47:28 12/12/2024
43 184.95099 0.838101 185.789091 572.154032 20.280973 13:48:29 12/12/2024
44 176.589824 0.510143 177.099967 586.281895 15.625806 13:49:29 12/12/2024
45 187.585507 0.581924 188.167431 515.436341 16.195898 13:50:29 12/12/2024
46 198.754135 0.506385 199.26052 479.016922 15.921106 13:51:29 12/12/2024
47 190.883722 0.745324 191.629046 484.65857 19.952056 13:52:29 12/12/2024
48 182.185347 0.726161 182.911508 551.074388 18.752508 13:53:29 12/12/2024
49 171.978426 0.428229 172.406655 602.250118 16.348032 13:54:30 12/12/2024
50 185.305951 0.477418 185.783369 519.364586 16.280414 13:55:30 12/12/2024
51 214.598332 0.488851 215.087183 435.053415 17.608912 13:56:30 12/12/2024
52 183.348596 0.52843 183.877026 536.955167 17.10209 13:57:30 12/12/2024
53 180.305632 0.537917 180.843549 564.334121 16.960913 13:58:30 12/12/2024
54 180.684177 0.623324 181.307501 565.956294 17.491357 13:59:30 12/12/2024
55 184.918924 0.613018 185.531942 556.162986 17.60998 14:00:30 12/12/2024
56 192.602883 0.517593 193.120476 542.609814 18.327151 14:01:31 12/12/2024
57 188.278114 0.51028 188.788394 572.449375 16.234192 14:02:31 12/12/2024
58 181.851401 0.694865 182.546266 549.058424 18.960314 14:03:31 12/12/2024
59 194.950214 0.577437 195.527651 500.519811 17.929237 14:04:31 12/12/2024
60 190.478253 0.585597 191.06385 549.19456 17.211263 14:05:31 12/12/2024
AVG 192.55 0.60 193.15 497.91 17.27
ppm@15% O2 54.53 140.56
NOx
(g/bhp-hr)
NOx
(lbs/hr)
CO
(g/bhp-hr)
CO
(lbs/hr)
0.52 0.63 0.82 0.99
Calculated Emission Levels
FTIR Measurements
ENG1 (North)
Citation Oil & Gas Corporation
Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant
Run 3
Record Date
EPA REFERENCE METHOD 1 EPA REFERENCE METHOD 2
Stack Diameter 10 Inches Kp=85.49 ft/sec Cp=0.84
Traverse Points 16 Port Point Insertion Depth dP Ts Stat P sqrt dP
Ports 2 (inches)(in h2O)(deg R)(in H2O)
EPA REFERENCE METHOD 3 A 1 0.50 0.35 1877 0.24 0.592
Average O2 0.0 (% dry)A 2 1.05 0.36 0.600
Average CO2 11.5 (% dry)A 3 1.94 0.39 0.624
Average N2 + CO 88.5 (% dry)A 4 3.23 0.44 0.663
Dry Molecular Weight 29.84 lb/lbmol A 5 6.77 0.43 0.656
Wet Molecular Weight 27.80 lb/lbmol A 6 8.06 0.40 0.632
ASTM D6348-03 / EPA REFERENCE METHOD 320 A 7 8.95 0.38 0.616
Barometric Pressure 23.53 in Hg A 8 9.50 0.37 0.608
Moisture Content 17.27 %A 9
ASTM D6348-03 / EPA REFERENCE METHOD 320 A 10
Average Analyzer NOx Level 193.15 ppm A 11
Calculated NOx Mass Output 0.63 lbs/hr A 12
Calculated NOx Output 0.52 g/bhp-hr A 13
ASTM D6348-03 / EPA REFERENCE METHOD 320 A 14
Average Analyzer CO Level 497.91 ppm A 15
Calculated CO Mass Output 0.99 lbs/hr A 16
Calculated CO Output 0.82 g/bhp-hr B 1 0.50 0.36 1877 0.24 0.600
LOAD APPROXIMATION B 2 1.05 0.37 0.608
Estimated Engine Load 550.0 BHP B 3 1.94 0.40 0.632
B 4 3.23 0.44 0.663
B 5 6.77 0.45 0.671
B 6 8.06 0.41 0.640
B 7 8.95 0.39 0.624
B 8 9.50 0.38 0.616
B 9
B 10
B 11
B 12
B 13
B 14
B 15
B 16
Averages 0.4 1877 0.2 0.628
Average Stack Gas Velocity 76.37 ft/sec
Average Dry Flowrate 457.79 dscfm
TEST RUN # 3

APPENDIX B

Date Time NO 191C span NO2 191C span H2O% (high) 191C Formaldehyde 191C Ethylene 191C TE span Propane 191C span Acetaldehyde 191C span CO ppm 191C (1of2) spanCO ppm Dry CO2% 191C NOx Wet NOx Dry NM NE HC C3 Temp ( C )Pressure (atm)12/12/2024 7:31:24 0.268584 0.001331 -0.003378 0.508756 0.908097 0.326123 0.567694 -0.013783 -0.013783 0.014986 0.269915 0.269905 4.145125 191.327286 1.0212512/12/2024 7:31:31 0.307311 0.024671 -0.011369 0.448821 -1.424553 -1.320465 -0.29231 0.042191 0.042186 0.021644 0.331982 0.331944 3.91306 191.373306 1.019307
12/12/2024 7:31:39 0.029054 0.030448 -0.015112 0.187712 -0.052292 -0.034252 -0.945132 0.25168 0.251642 0.012379 0.059502 0.059493 2.340796 191.373306 1.02109712/12/2024 7:31:46 0.147826 0.022622 -0.007791 0.294789 0.175938 0.518454 -0.097089 -0.019135 -0.019134 0.005317 0.170447 0.170434 4.314317 191.40239 1.019169
12/12/2024 7:32:23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 191.341156 1.0194112/12/2024 7:32:36 0.036929 0.007204 0.002673 -0.080114 -0.045678 -0.958095 0.075734 -0.08859 -0.088592 -0.003271 0.044133 0.044134 0.012576 191.301849 1.01892112/12/2024 7:32:44 -0.074318 -0.081106 -0.004973 -0.296229 -0.179528 -0.502883 -0.351227 0.053444 0.053442 -0.004543 -0.155424 -0.155416 0.073463 191.271561 1.01875612/12/2024 7:32:51 -0.05379 0.022318 -0.000577 -0.134406 -0.423541 0.088758 -1.056172 -0.020585 -0.020585 -0.001168 -0.031472 -0.031472 0.002625 191.329712 1.01990412/12/2024 7:32:59 0.065906 0.030814 -0.013354 -0.282326 0.153434 -0.731779 -0.469299 -0.092655 -0.092643 -0.009223 0.09672 0.096707 0.111286 191.344238 1.02270412/12/2024 7:33:06 -0.096132 -0.04446 -0.012262 0.040549 0.590002 -0.493222 -0.690598 -0.021147 -0.021144 -0.006442 -0.140592 -0.140575 0.037963 191.300629 1.02059212/12/2024 7:33:14 0.078693 -0.015694 0.00019 -0.277501 -0.13841 -0.507099 0.603191 0.056965 0.056965 0.000754 0.062999 0.062999 0.010507 191.40239 1.022153
12/12/2024 7:33:21 -0.100354 -0.010109 -0.002415 -0.051725 -0.395798 0.062666 -0.380278 -0.066621 -0.066619 0.000667 -0.110462 -0.11046 -0.005837 191.318802 1.02178612/12/2024 7:33:29 -0.032437 -0.023527 0.006651 -0.344418 -0.743699 -1.26231 0.957314 -0.055319 -0.055323 -0.00418 -0.055964 -0.055967 0.141675 191.300629 1.0227512/12/2024 7:33:36 -0.111479 -0.049779 -0.004906 -0.061077 -0.649119 -1.826437 -0.757329 0.008302 0.008302 0.000427 -0.161258 -0.16125 0.019799 191.40239 1.024218
Date Time CO ppm 191C (1of2) span NOx Wet Propane 191C span Temp ( C )Pressure (atm)Date Time Ethylene 191C TE Temp ( C )Pressure (atm)12/12/2024 7:34:47 486.546363 510.105746 505.484513 191.454468 1.020956 12/12/2024 7:39:06 98.158797 191.395111 1.017876
12/12/2024 7:34:55 486.805148 510.136172 501.213707 191.373306 1.02073 12/12/2024 7:39:13 97.833752 191.329712 1.01903212/12/2024 7:35:02 486.379588 509.620359 502.064133 191.373306 1.019628 12/12/2024 7:39:21 97.210047 191.387848 1.01921512/12/2024 7:35:10 486.335496 510.387739 502.904525 191.416916 1.019399 12/12/2024 7:39:28 96.940991 191.387848 1.02063812/12/2024 7:35:17 485.590354 509.254994 500.111071 191.445999 1.021235 12/12/2024 7:39:36 97.807285 191.286102 1.01962812/12/2024 7:35:25 486.817422 509.556865 498.889903 191.40239 1.020363 12/12/2024 7:39:44 97.708661 191.387848 1.01838912/12/2024 7:35:32 487.593353 509.225669 502.685864 191.475067 1.019904 12/12/2024 7:39:51 97.700948 191.382401 1.0203812/12/2024 7:35:40 487.041546 509.374175 503.541668 191.445999 1.022107 12/12/2024 7:39:59 97.985573 191.329712 1.020592
12/12/2024 7:35:48 485.942094 509.56372 500.989013 191.35878 1.01949 12/12/2024 7:40:06 98.822725 191.416916 1.01866412/12/2024 7:35:55 487.457082 509.058018 499.509854 191.387848 1.020959 12/12/2024 7:40:14 98.074326 191.300629 1.019674
Date Time NO2 191C span Temp ( C )Pressure (atm)12/12/2024 7:36:55 143.55262 191.369675 1.01926912/12/2024 7:37:02 144.542387 191.460526 1.019812
12/12/2024 7:37:10 145.159113 191.373306 1.0217412/12/2024 7:37:17 145.175048 191.475067 1.02348412/12/2024 7:37:25 146.007735 191.40239 1.01958212/12/2024 7:37:32 145.979928 191.40239 1.02008712/12/2024 7:37:40 146.142888 191.373306 1.02054612/12/2024 7:37:47 145.988636 191.331528 1.02017912/12/2024 7:37:55 146.074155 191.416916 1.02196912/12/2024 7:38:02 146.023117 191.40239 1.021923
Date Time CO ppm 191C (1of2) span NOx Wet Propane 191C span Temp ( C )Pressure (atm)Date Time Ethylene 191C TE Temp ( C )Pressure (atm)12/12/2024 7:41:32 482.938887 507.529855 501.608691 191.276413 1.020072 12/12/2024 7:43:36 98.849154 191.420547 1.01953612/12/2024 7:41:39 482.540662 507.489648 503.196072 191.344238 1.019995 12/12/2024 7:43:43 98.479113 191.35878 1.01889412/12/2024 7:41:47 484.87536 508.673753 503.517995 191.329712 1.023025 12/12/2024 7:43:51 98.924499 191.431458 1.017241
12/12/2024 7:41:54 485.276258 508.504625 503.374201 191.329712 1.023392 12/12/2024 7:43:58 99.594322 191.489594 1.0197212/12/2024 7:42:02 484.906752 508.691909 498.94921 191.445999 1.01995 12/12/2024 7:44:06 98.565647 191.373306 1.018022
12/12/2024 7:42:09 485.220668 509.449806 499.953396 191.31517 1.01995 12/12/2024 7:44:13 99.249476 191.373306 1.01811312/12/2024 7:42:17 484.416188 508.65411 504.209966 191.416916 1.020363 12/12/2024 7:44:21 97.607222 191.382401 1.01937612/12/2024 7:42:24 485.42174 509.513586 498.984926 191.489594 1.020363 12/12/2024 7:44:28 98.863496 191.460526 1.01783812/12/2024 7:42:32 484.730076 509.68082 501.625259 191.344238 1.021866 12/12/2024 7:44:36 97.820645 191.445999 1.02086812/12/2024 7:42:39 484.690291 508.887019 507.834973 191.35878 1.019766 12/12/2024 7:44:43 98.154166 191.475067 1.019674
Raw Calibration Data
BACKGROUND / PRE DIRECT ZERO
PRE DIRECT CAL
NO2 CAL
PRE SYSTEM CAL
Date Time CO ppm 191C (1of2) span NOx Wet Propane 191C span Ethylene 191C TE Temp ( C )Pressure (atm)12/12/2024 7:45:14 0.29116 0.266934 0.18482 0.667865 191.416916 1.014763
12/12/2024 7:45:21 0.079011 0.312304 -0.700365 0.10059 191.445999 1.01751712/12/2024 7:45:29 0.040925 0.095437 0.36745 -0.122022 191.475067 1.015589
12/12/2024 7:45:36 0.068479 -0.120841 -0.82812 0.255033 191.40239 1.01604812/12/2024 7:45:44 0.107663 -0.000158 -0.317254 -0.049171 191.504135 1.0169212/12/2024 7:45:51 -0.008687 -0.022485 -0.257767 0.608469 191.460526 1.0161412/12/2024 7:45:59 -0.073678 -0.035955 -1.380123 0.208342 191.420547 1.018171
Date Time CO2% 191C Propane 191C span Temp ( C )Pressure (atm)
12/12/2024 10:57:09 10.406451 22.461531 191.776672 1.0244912/12/2024 10:57:17 10.338499 23.596414 191.73671 1.02463212/12/2024 10:57:24 10.04638 21.537116 191.809387 1.02444812/12/2024 10:57:32 10.270443 22.91361 191.780319 1.02421812/12/2024 10:57:39 10.33456 21.67771 191.838455 1.02610112/12/2024 10:58:22 9.813327 23.588228 191.718979 1.01716212/12/2024 10:58:24 9.808245 24.95775 191.64949 1.038655
12/12/2024 10:58:32 7.279662 115.374972 191.765778 1.03133312/12/2024 10:58:39 5.492608 175.087268 191.620422 1.03757612/12/2024 10:58:47 7.001964 128.456028 191.64949 1.02394312/12/2024 10:58:55 8.483433 70.02995 191.63678 1.02865412/12/2024 10:59:02 4.144775 247.849257 191.591354 1.02394312/12/2024 10:59:10 1.89119 369.128628 191.664032 1.02513612/12/2024 10:59:17 6.467684 175.709038 191.765778 1.029635
12/12/2024 10:59:25 8.939681 64.963269 191.620422 1.01705812/12/2024 10:59:32 9.518868 45.767071 191.64949 1.031976
12/12/2024 10:59:40 9.756762 42.485602 191.722168 1.0179312/12/2024 10:59:47 9.570736 46.304562 191.738525 1.0252412/12/2024 10:59:55 9.318606 51.785013 191.634964 1.02403512/12/2024 11:00:43 9.48237 52.717835 191.684891 1.02472612/12/2024 11:00:47 9.60986 53.125163 191.700363 1.02371412/12/2024 11:00:55 9.497019 54.698471 191.634964 1.02646812/12/2024 11:01:02 9.497036 58.625968 191.73671 1.024127
12/12/2024 11:01:10 9.48423 60.761476 191.664032 1.02297912/12/2024 11:01:17 8.814096 63.559976 191.678558 1.021602
12/12/2024 11:01:25 9.162262 66.340601 191.707642 1.02674312/12/2024 11:01:32 9.37996 55.118465 191.713089 1.02564112/12/2024 11:02:22 9.131891 47.568084 191.707947 1.023714
Date Time CO ppm 191C (1of2) span NOx Wet Propane 191C span Temp ( C )Pressure (atm)Date Time Ethylene 191C TE Temp ( C )Pressure (atm)12/12/2024 14:19:04 482.412081 506.451948 506.762637 191.624054 1.012066 12/12/2024 14:16:56 97.07388 191.556229 1.01281612/12/2024 14:19:11 481.744709 504.613558 498.180162 191.620422 1.012376 12/12/2024 14:17:04 97.822548 191.620422 1.01352312/12/2024 14:19:19 482.052174 505.852213 501.281335 191.605881 1.011274 12/12/2024 14:17:11 98.653467 191.591354 1.01379912/12/2024 14:19:26 481.98028 505.789044 501.901255 191.634964 1.013844 12/12/2024 14:17:19 98.317115 191.576813 1.01265112/12/2024 14:19:34 483.310937 505.371066 500.175242 191.64949 1.012605 12/12/2024 14:17:27 98.168603 191.576813 1.00962212/12/2024 14:19:41 483.024537 506.498591 500.614709 191.576813 1.011595 12/12/2024 14:17:34 98.301196 191.562271 1.01076912/12/2024 14:19:49 484.378019 507.171075 504.435072 191.620422 1.011963 12/12/2024 14:17:42 98.010412 191.620422 1.01246812/12/2024 14:19:56 482.735906 506.777782 503.332956 191.664032 1.014625 12/12/2024 14:17:49 98.456449 191.562271 1.009713
12/12/2024 14:20:04 484.692663 507.30927 501.211808 191.64949 1.011383 12/12/2024 14:17:57 98.885101 191.547745 1.00901312/12/2024 14:20:11 481.638396 506.400199 501.928808 191.664032 1.012238 12/12/2024 14:18:04 99.38792 191.591354 1.012192
Date Time CO ppm 191C (1of2) span NOx Wet Propane 191C span Temp ( C )Pressure (atm)Date Time Ethylene 191C TE Temp ( C )Pressure (atm)
12/12/2024 14:16:56 0.207328 0.673096 0.710662 191.556229 1.012816 12/12/2024 14:20:54 -0.45723 191.641006 1.01155712/12/2024 14:17:04 -0.008357 0.156423 -0.611825 191.620422 1.013523 12/12/2024 14:21:01 -0.106905 191.722168 1.012146
12/12/2024 14:17:11 -0.029336 0.197054 -0.736699 191.591354 1.013799 12/12/2024 14:21:09 0.527868 191.6931 1.01086112/12/2024 14:17:19 -0.086428 0.414206 -0.430916 191.576813 1.012651 12/12/2024 14:21:16 -0.867206 191.722168 1.01026412/12/2024 14:17:27 -0.16153 0.357751 -0.964325 191.576813 1.009622 12/12/2024 14:21:24 0.060923 191.678558 1.00907112/12/2024 14:17:34 -0.078951 0.265293 -0.694363 191.562271 1.010769 12/12/2024 14:21:31 0.802167 191.707642 1.01086112/12/2024 14:17:42 0.087103 0.560589 -0.698116 191.620422 1.012468 12/12/2024 14:21:39 -0.494489 191.707642 1.010081
POST SYSTEM ZERO
PRE SYSTEM ZERO
SAMPLE SPIKE RECOVERY
POST SYSTEM CAL
PRE TEST 1 502.7 10.4 22.5 9.5 60.8 0.089 78.4%
Sensor Analyzer Cal Zero Cal Zero
Response (ppm)Level (ppm)Response (ppm)Error (%)Error (%)
NOx 509.2 508.3 0.0 0.18 -0.01
CO 487.6 507.6 0.0 -3.94 -0.01
Propane 502.7 502.7 -0.5 0.00 -0.10
Ethylene 98.8 101.50 0.0 -2.64 0.02
Sensor System Cal Zero Cal Zero
Response (ppm)Level (ppm)Response (ppm)Recovery (%)Error (%)
NOx 509.5 508.3 0.2 0.24 0.04
CO 485.4 507.6 0.1 -4.37 0.03
Propane 501.6 502.7 0.0 -0.21 -0.01
Ethylene*99.6 101.50 0.2 -1.88 0.21
Sensor System Cal Zero Cal Zero Cal Zero
Response (ppm)Level (ppm)Response (ppm)Recovery (%)Error (%)Drift Error (%)Drift Error (%)
NOx 507.3 508.3 0.4 -0.19 0.07 0.43 0.03
CO 484.7 507.6 0.0 -4.51 0.00 0.14 0.03
Propane 501.2 502.7 -0.5 -0.30 -0.10 0.08 0.09
Ethylene*99.4 101.50 -0.1 -2.08 -0.08 0.20 0.29
*CTS Scans are conducted with Ethylene through the sample line.
Lf
5.11
Lr Cr Tr Pr Lr/Lf
5.16 98.8 191.4 1.0 1.01
Ls Cs Ts Ps Ls/Lf
5.12 99.6 191.5 1.0 1.00
Pathlength
Stack Propane
Concentration
Stack + Spike CO2
Concentration
Stack + Propane
Concentration
DF
Calculated
POST SYSTEM CAL
PRE SYSTEM CAL
% Recovery
Propane
PRE DIRECT CAL
FTIR QA/QC SUMMARY
SAMPLE RECOVERY CALCULATIONS
Period Spike #Concentration of
Propane Cylinder
Stack CO2
Concentration
Citation – Pineview Tank Battery & Gas Plant
12/12/2024
Citation – Pineview Tank Battery & Gas Plant
12/12/2024
Citation – Pineview Tank Battery & Gas Plant
12/12/2024

Spectral Fit
Run 1

Spectral Fit
Run 2

Spectral Fit
Run 3

Analysis Validation Report
Sample Filename: C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000154.LAB
Filename for noise: C:\OLT\Data\Golden Spectrum\New FTIR 09-13-23\NEW FTIR 09-13-23_000003.LAB
Interferences Filenames: C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000068.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000069.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000070.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000071.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000072.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000073.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000074.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000075.LAB
Recipe path: C:\OLT\RECIPES\STEPHEN PYER TEST.MGRCP
Gas calibration NameConc MDC3 MDC2 MDC1 MAU FMU*R OCU ~ DL ~ CL ~ Bias Sigma Range Span Comment
NO 191C 143.79 5.56 -0.18 0.24 7.62 7.62 -3.07 --0-2795 1.03 Good
NO2 191C 0.49 0.52 0.53 0.02 0.03 0.55 0.55 0.59 0.59 0.05 0.18 0-488 1.03 Close to DL
N2O 191C -0.1 0.45 0.17 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.2 0.43 0.03 0.06 0-200 -Close to DL
NH3 TE 191C 12.62 82.06 10.01 2.05 3.49 140.05 140.05 12.78 79.81 2.77 3.34 0-2995 -Close to DL
H2O% (HIGH) 191C17.7 0.85 -0.01 0.01 1.32 1.32 -0.47 --0-40 -Good
FORMALDEHYDE 191C5.02 2.03 2.14 0.16 0.18 2.29 2.29 2.17 2.17 0.03 0.71 0-69 1.18 Close to DL
FORMIC ACID 191C TE0.06 20.38 2.08 0.7 0.82 23.86 23.86 2.41 19.7 0.33 0.69 0-466 -Close to DL
CH4 2900 CM-1 191C4056.36 189.4 -0.84 1.22 329.01 329.01 -105.17 --0-3143 0.98 Check it!
PROPANE 191C23.17 2.51 24.13 0.11 0.13 3.01 3.01 26.55 26.55 2.42 8.04 0-4976 0.95 Close to DL
PROPYLENE 191C TE-11.61 23.53 10.35 0.78 0.93 27.83 27.83 12.2 22.42 1.85 3.45 0-194 -Close to DL
ETHANE 191C 178.7 6.15 -0.26 0.4 9.6 9.6 -3.62 --0-1004 -Good
ETHYLENE 191C TE21.41 78.13 20.76 1.01 1.24 94.04 94.04 23.45 76.5 2.68 6.92 0-900 -Close to DL
CO PPM 191C (1OF2)421.17 11.99 -0.15 0.32 23.2 23.2 -8.42 --0-5010 1.01 Good
CO2% 191C 9.62 0.19 -0.01 0.01 0.26 0.26 -0.19 --0-23 -Good
CO% 191C (2OF2)0.04 0 -0 0 0.01 0.01 -0 --0-8 -Good
ACETALDEHYDE 191C-0.7 3.03 1.34 0.37 0.47 3.89 3.89 1.46 2.65 0.12 0.45 0-186 1 Close to DL
ACETYLENE 191C1.25 6.6 1.19 0.36 0.48 8.72 8.72 1.42 6.22 0.23 0.4 0-1016 -Close to DL
SO2 191C 6.45 5.7 8.28 0.24 0.29 6.95 6.95 9.15 9.15 0.87 2.76 0-964 1.02 Close to DL
HEXANE 191C -0.48 1.89 0.99 0.06 0.09 2.56 2.56 1.01 1.82 0.02 0.33 0-1000 -Close to DL
Analysis Validation Report
Sample Filename: C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000215.LAB
Filename for noise: C:\OLT\Data\Golden Spectrum\New FTIR 09-13-23\NEW FTIR 09-13-23_000003.LAB
Interferences Filenames: C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000068.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000069.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000070.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000071.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000072.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000073.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000074.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000075.LAB
Recipe path: C:\OLT\RECIPES\STEPHEN PYER TEST.MGRCP
Gas calibration NameConc MDC3 MDC2 MDC1 MAU FMU*R OCU ~ DL ~ CL ~ Bias Sigma Range Span Comment
NO 191C 143.66 6.19 -0.18 0.24 8.48 8.48 -3.35 --0-2795 1.03 Good
NO2 191C 0.81 0.48 0.53 0.02 0.03 0.51 0.51 0.59 0.59 0.05 0.18 0-488 1.03 Close to DL
N2O 191C -0.14 0.47 0.17 0.02 0.02 0.54 0.54 0.2 0.45 0.03 0.06 0-200 -Close to DL
NH3 TE 191C 23.27 83.65 10.01 2.05 3.49 142.77 142.77 12.78 81.08 2.77 3.34 0-2995 -Close to DL
H2O% (HIGH) 191C19.29 0.89 -0.01 0.01 1.38 1.38 -0.49 --0-40 -Good
FORMALDEHYDE 191C6.26 2.02 2.14 0.16 0.18 2.29 2.29 2.17 2.17 0.03 0.71 0-69 1.18 Close to DL
FORMIC ACID 191C TE0.36 21.18 2.08 0.7 0.82 24.79 24.79 2.41 20.49 0.33 0.69 0-466 -Close to DL
CH4 2900 CM-1 191C3872.91 173.05 -0.84 1.22 300.61 300.61 -95.63 --0-3143 0.98 Check it!
PROPANE 191C25.87 2.68 24.13 0.11 0.13 3.21 3.21 26.55 26.55 2.42 8.04 0-4976 0.95 Close to DL
PROPYLENE 191C TE-12.52 23.94 10.35 0.78 0.93 28.32 28.32 12.2 22.8 1.85 3.45 0-194 -Close to DL
ETHANE 191C 183.3 6.19 -0.26 0.4 9.65 9.65 -3.69 --0-1004 -Good
ETHYLENE 191C TE21.42 56.46 20.76 1.01 1.24 67.96 67.96 23.45 54.83 2.68 6.92 0-900 -Close to DL
CO PPM 191C (1OF2)484.76 13.35 -0.15 0.32 25.48 25.48 -9.7 --0-5010 1.01 Good
CO2% 191C 9.52 0.2 -0.01 0.01 0.27 0.27 -0.19 --0-23 -Good
CO% 191C (2OF2)0.05 0 -0 0 0.01 0.01 -0 --0-8 -Good
ACETALDEHYDE 191C-0.55 2.94 1.34 0.37 0.47 3.77 3.77 1.46 2.56 0.12 0.45 0-186 1 Close to DL
ACETYLENE 191C0.93 7.01 1.19 0.36 0.48 9.26 9.26 1.42 6.64 0.23 0.4 0-1016 -Close to DL
SO2 191C 5.47 6.05 8.28 0.24 0.29 7.38 7.38 9.15 9.15 0.87 2.76 0-964 1.02 Close to DL
HEXANE 191C -0.2 1.95 0.99 0.06 0.09 2.64 2.64 1.01 1.88 0.02 0.33 0-1000 -Close to DL
Analysis Validation Report
Sample Filename: C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000276.LAB
Filename for noise: C:\OLT\Data\Golden Spectrum\New FTIR 09-13-23\NEW FTIR 09-13-23_000003.LAB
Interferences Filenames: C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000068.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000069.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000070.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000071.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000072.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000073.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000074.LAB
C:\OLT\Data\Citation Oil&Gas\Pineview TBGP 12-12-24\PINEVIEW TBGP 12-12-24_000075.LAB
Recipe path: C:\OLT\RECIPES\STEPHEN PYER TEST.MGRCP
Gas calibration NameConc MDC3 MDC2 MDC1 MAU FMU*R OCU ~ DL ~ CL ~ Bias Sigma Range Span Comment
NO 191C 154.06 5.79 -0.18 0.24 7.93 7.93 -3.24 --0-2795 1.03 Good
NO2 191C 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.02 0.03 0.52 0.52 0.59 0.59 0.05 0.18 0-488 1.03 Close to DL
N2O 191C -0.05 0.44 0.17 0.02 0.02 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.42 0.03 0.06 0-200 -Close to DL
NH3 TE 191C 10.8 82.07 10.01 2.05 3.49 140.08 140.08 12.78 79.88 2.77 3.34 0-2995 -Close to DL
H2O% (HIGH) 191C17.1 0.84 -0.01 0.01 1.31 1.31 -0.46 --0-40 -Good
FORMALDEHYDE 191C5.68 2.06 2.14 0.16 0.18 2.33 2.33 2.17 2.17 0.03 0.71 0-69 1.18 Close to DL
FORMIC ACID 191C TE-0.44 20.5 2.08 0.7 0.82 24 24 2.41 19.81 0.33 0.69 0-466 -Close to DL
CH4 2900 CM-1 191C3949.42 180.01 -0.84 1.22 312.69 312.69 -99.64 --0-3143 0.98 Check it!
PROPANE 191C 28.12 2.54 24.13 0.11 0.13 3.05 3.05 26.55 26.56 2.42 8.04 0-4976 0.95 Close to DL
PROPYLENE 191C TE-10.73 23.72 10.35 0.78 0.93 28.06 28.06 12.2 22.63 1.85 3.45 0-194 -Close to DL
ETHANE 191C 194.15 6.24 -0.26 0.4 9.73 9.73 -3.89 --0-1004 -Good
ETHYLENE 191C TE21.04 51.74 20.76 1.01 1.24 62.28 62.28 23.45 50.13 2.68 6.92 0-900 -Close to DL
CO PPM 191C (1OF2)502.92 13.42 -0.15 0.32 25.62 25.62 -10.06 --0-5010 1.01 Good
CO2% 191C 9.71 0.2 -0.01 0.01 0.28 0.28 -0.19 --0-23 -Good
CO% 191C (2OF2)0.05 0 -0 0 0.01 0.01 -0 --0-8 -Good
ACETALDEHYDE 191C-0.8 3.14 1.34 0.37 0.47 4.03 4.03 1.46 2.75 0.12 0.45 0-186 1 Close to DL
ACETYLENE 191C0.92 6.48 1.19 0.36 0.48 8.55 8.55 1.42 6.1 0.23 0.4 0-1016 -Close to DL
SO2 191C 5.75 5.87 8.28 0.24 0.29 7.16 7.16 9.15 9.15 0.87 2.76 0-964 1.02 Close to DL
HEXANE 191C -0.28 1.91 0.99 0.06 0.09 2.58 2.58 1.01 1.84 0.02 0.33 0-1000 -Close to DL

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX D

Test
Run
Flowrate
dscfm
Approx.
BHP
Avg O2
%
NOx
ppmvd
NOx
g/bhp-hr
NOx
lbs/hr
CO
ppmvd
CO
g/bhp-hr
CO
lbs/hr
Moisture
Content %
1 445.32 550.0 0.0 139.56 0.37 0.44 503.52 0.81 0.977 17.57
2 461.36 550.0 0.0 182.97 0.50 0.60 490.33 0.81 0.985 17.51
3 457.79 550.0 0.0 193.15 0.52 0.63 497.91 0.82 0.993 17.27
550.0 0.0 171.89 0.46 0.56 497.26 0.81 0.985 17.45
Summary
Average Levels
Example Calculations: Citation Oil & Gas Corporation, Pineview Tank Battery and Gas
Plant, ENG1 (North)

The following is a step-by-step calculation for the first test run conducted on the Pineview Tank
Battery and Gas Plant ENG1 (North).

Test Parameters • Stack Diameter = 10 inches • Traverse Points = 16 • Ports = 2 • Barometric Pressure = 23.53 in Hg
• Average O2 = 0.0% • Average CO2 = 11.8% • Load Approximation = 550.0 bhp • Moisture Content = 17.57%
EPA 40 CFR 60(A) Methods 1-3: Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Flow Rate
Dry Molecular Weight (lb/lbmol) = (0.44 * %CO2) + (0.32 * %O2) + ((0.28 * (%N2 + %CO))
Where: %CO2 – Carbon Dioxide Content Of The Gas = 11.8%
%O2 – Oxygen Content Of The Gas = 0.0%
%N2 – Nitrogen Content Of The Gas %CO – Carbon Monoxide Content Of The Gas
(%N2 +%CO) = (100 - %O2 - %CO2) = (100 – 0.0 – 11.8)
= 88.2% Dry
= (0.44 * %CO2) + (0.32 * %O2) + ((0.28 * (%N2 + %CO)) = (0.44 * 11.8) + (0.32 * 0.0) + (0.28 * 88.2)
= 29.89 lb/lbmol
Wet Molecular Weight (lb/lbmol) = MD * (1-BWS) + (18) * BWS
Where: MD – Molecular Weight Of The Dry Gas (lb/lbmol) = 29.89 lb/lbmol
BWS – Moisture Content Of The Gas (%/100) = 17.57% = MD * (1-BWS) + (18) * BWS
= 29.89 * (1 – (17.57/ 100)) + (18 * (17.57/ 100))
= 27.80 lb/lbmol
Average Stack Gas Velocity (ft/sec)
= Cp * (85.49) * ∆PAVG * (TS / (((PS / 13.6) + PB) * MA))
Where: CP – Pitot tube constant (unitless) = 0.84 ∆PAVG – Average square root of the stack gas pitot DP (inches water) = 0.611 in H2O
TS – Average stack temperature (R) = 1862 R
PB – Barometric pressure (in Hg) = 23.53 in Hg
PS – Stack pressure relative to barometric pressure (inches water) = 0.2 in H2O
MA – Molecular weight of the wet gas (lb/lbmol) = 27.80 lb/lbmol
= Cp * (85.49) * ∆PAVG * (TS / (((PS / 13.6) + PB) * MA))
= 0.84 * (85.49) * 0.611 * ( 1862 / (((0.2/ 13.6) + 23.53) * 27.80))
= 73.98 ft/sec
Average Dry Flowrate (dscfm)
= 60 * (1-BWS) * VS *  * (((DS / 2) / 12))2)* TSTD / TS * (PB + (PS / 13.6)) / 29.92

Where: DS – Diameter of the stack (inches) = 10 inches
BWS – Moisture content of the gas (%) = 17.57%
TSTD – Standard temperature (528R)
TS – Average stack temperature (R) = 1862 R PB – Barometric pressure (in Hg) = 23.53 in Hg
PS – Stack pressure relative to barometric pressure (inches water) = 0.2 in H2O
VS– Average Stack gas velocity (ft/sec) = 73.98 ft/sec

= 60 * (1-BWS) * VS *  * (((DS / 2) / 12))2)* TSTD / TS * (PB + (PS / 13.6)) / 29.92

= 60 * (1 - (17.57/ 100)) * 73.98 *  * (((10 / 2) / 12))2) * 528 / 1862 * (23.53 + (0.2 /
13.6)) / 29.92

= 445.32 dscfm

Conversion of Dry Flowrate to m3/hr
= Q * 60 * 2.83168*10 -2
Where: Q – Volumetric Flowrate = 445.32 dscfm
2.83168*10 -2 – Conversion factor for cubic feet to cubic meter
60 – Minutes in an hour
= Q * 60 * 2.83168*10 -2

= 445.32 *60 * 2.83168*10 -2
= 756.607 m3/hr

ASTM D 6348-03: Determination of NOx and CO Emissions From Stationary Sources
NOx Emission Rate (g/Bhp-hr) = (Cd * 1.912*10 -3 * Q * T) / HP-hr

Where: Cd – Measured NOx concentration in ppm = 139.56 ppm 1.92*10 -3 - Conversion constant for ppm to g/m3 NOx
Q – Volumetric Flowrate = 756.607 m3/hr T – Time in Hours of Test Run = 1 hr HP-hr – Unit Brake Horsepower = Bhp
= (Cd * 1.912*10 -3 * Q * T) / HP-hr

= (139.56 * 1.912*10 -3 * 756.607 * 1) /
= 0.37 g/Bhp-hr
NOx Emission Rate (lbs/hr)
= g/Bhp-hr / 454 * Bhp Where:
g/Bhp-hr = 0.37 g/Bhp-hr 454 – Conversion factor for g to lbs
Bhp - Unit Brake Horsepower = Bhp
= g/Bhp-hr / 454 * Bhp
= 0.37 / 454 * = 0.44 lbs/hr

CO Emission Rate (g/Bhp-hr)
= (Cd * 1.164*10 -3 * Q * T) / HP-hr Where:
Cd – Measured CO concentration in ppm = 503.52 ppm 1.164*10 -3 - Conversion constant for ppm to g/m3 CO
Q – Volumetric Flowrate = 756.607 m3/hr
T – Time in Hours of Test Run = 1 hr HP-hr – Unit Brake Horsepower = Bhp
= (Cd * 1.164*10 -3 * Q * T) / HP-hr
= (503.52 * 1.164*10 -3 * 756.607 * 1) /
= 0.81 g/Bhp-hr

CO Emission Rate (lbs/hr) = g/Bhp-hr / 454 * Bhp
Where: g/Bhp-hr = 0.81 g/Bhp-hr
454 – Conversion factor for g to lbs Bhp - Unit Brake Horsepower = Bhp
= g/Bhp-hr / 454 * Bhp = 0.81 / 454 *
= 0.98 lbs/hr

APPENDIX E

FTIR Engine Test Sheet
Company Name [.ter\-' 01"\
Location / Unit 1.0. ~·I(]c:.v·,ew I~J (n? '£.1­
3x1hr NLV
David Martinez
Jefe..f\""
1\1~1~·~~
Type of Test Completed
Field Technician (s)
Client Rep and/or State Rep
Date
Non-Resettable Run Time Hours Stack Diagram
Engine Make 1\iVL.,,\ie < ,~e.I'·lor-
Engine Model
Enqine SIN
Port Distance A
Verified: tiM
~brt\S
)"10~"et
5"
........."'..".".~".,.~".,~,,,'
".,......,.............,...... .... , ....,-'­T
Port Distance B 1t11' A
Exhaust Diameter (inches)
Calibration Gas
NO (ppm)
CO (ppm)
Propane (ppm)
Methane (ppm)
Ethylene (ppm)
N02 (ppm)
Acetaldehyde (ppm)
\D"
Cylinder #
CC41 0726
CC41 0726
CC41 0726
CC41 0726
EB0106918
ALM022248
CC431764
Concentration
508.3
507.6
502.7
503.7
101.5
149.2
198.7
[
"',,<, '<;.;. .. ,••
i1 r
!,_r~_j
t
B
1
Test 1 Test 2 Test 3
Time of Reading W.OS r~:o4 I: 0 S
Atm Pressure (in Hg) d.~.SS A \.«;~ A~SS
Atm Temp CF) \~ ~~ d...l
Enqine RPM ttlLI ~SD &5<-/
*Manifold Pres. )fac("}»r Boost(psi) or Boost (psia)
Manifold TemoTFI
Psuction (psi) Stage 1
r", \\
\\~
\~
t
IU
I'~
lo
QI I n,
Tsuction CF) Stage 1 --.. ..-.... -
Pdischarae (psi) staoe 1
Psuction (psi) Stage 2
Tsuction CF) Stage 2
Pdischarae (psi) Staae 2
~O .----­-
\I..\U
'30 -_.
''is
3D
,--­-U-1"5
Psuction (psi) Stage 3 \ \ \
Tsuction CF) Stage 3 \
Pdischarae (psi) Staqe 3 .~lD bOt> 6t>.,S
Psuction (psi) Stage 4 I \
Tsuction CF) Stage 4 1 I
Pdischarge (psi) Stage 4 I
Gas Throuchout (mmcf/d) or ( ) \ J
Pre CatTemp CF) \(.,w \0'\--. 10$\
Post Cat Temp CF)
Cat Differential Pres. (" of H2O)
\~ ()).,-\ '1~"?;,-14\ I -Humidity % ~lll ~l.cl. 7; c '1
02% b C1 D
C02 % Dry
LOAD % (Panel) or (Estimated)
Ignition Timing CF)
\Vi--'
\\. 'I --
\I.S
.-­
-...
AFR Setting mV (Left Bank)
AFR Settina mV (Rioht Bank)
o•I6~D -O,t".630-0.'636--.
Rev 8
• Some units show boost in inches of Hg. In this situation please indicate if it is
positive (+) or negative(-). Eg: (+12") or (- 5")
9/17/2019
COMPANY NAME:Citation COMPANY LOCATION:Pineview TBGP E1 DATE:December 12, 2024
STACK DIAMETER (inches):10 TRAVERSE POINTS:16 2
TEST RUN #1 TEST RUN #2 TEST RUN #3
AVERAGE O2:0 AVERAGE O2:0 AVERAGE O2:0
AVERAGE CO2:11.8 AVERAGE CO2:11.8 AVERAGE CO2:11.5
BARO PRESSURE:23.53 BARO PRESSURE:23.53 BARO PRESSURE:23.53
Point Insertion DepthDP (H2O)Ts (deg R)Stat P (H2O)Point Insertion DepthDP (H2O)Ts (deg R)Stat P (H2O)Point Insertion DepthDP (H2O)Ts (deg R)Stat P (H2O)
1 0.5 0.33 1402 0.23 1 0.5 0.36 1423 0.24 1 0.5 0.35 1417 0.24
2 1.05 0.34 2 1.05 0.38 2 1.05 0.36
3 1.94 0.36 3 1.94 0.41 3 1.94 0.39
4 3.23 0.4 4 3.23 0.45 4 3.23 0.44
5 6.77 0.41 5 6.77 0.44 5 6.77 0.43
6 8.06 0.38 6 8.06 0.42 6 8.06 0.4
7 8.95 0.35 7 8.95 0.39 7 8.95 0.38
8 9.5 0.35 8 9.5 0.37 8 9.5 0.37
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
1 0.5 0.33 1402 0.23 1 0.5 0.37 1423 0.24 1 0.5 0.36 1417 0.24
2 1.05 0.35 2 1.05 0.38 2 1.05 0.37
3 1.94 0.39 3 1.94 0.41 3 1.94 0.4
4 3.23 0.42 4 3.23 0.46 4 3.23 0.44
5 6.77 0.44 5 6.77 0.45 5 6.77 0.45
6 8.06 0.4 6 8.06 0.42 6 8.06 0.41
7 8.95 0.37 7 8.95 0.4 7 8.95 0.39
8 9.5 0.36 8 9.5 0.37 8 9.5 0.38
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
Worksheet: O2 Stratification
Client:Citation
Location:Pineview TBGP E1
Date:12/12/2024
PD:10
DD:24 YES Method 1 Criteria Met
UD:5 YES Method 1 Criteria Met
Port Point Insertion Depth Reading
(inches)(%)
A 1 1.66 0.00
A 2 5.00 0.00
A 3 8.33 0.00
A 4
A 5
A 6
A 7
A 8
A 9
A 10
A 11
A 12
Average 0.00
Notes: To demonstrate non-stratified flow and utilize one sampling location
O2 may not deviate by more than +/- 5% of the average O2 concentration.
EPA REFERENCE METHOD 3A (Determination Of Stratification)
ATTACHMENT B
Notice of Intent and Test Protocol

14077 Cutten Road ꞏ Houston, TX 77069-2212 ꞏ 281.891.1000

October 08, 2024

Ms. Alexis North Via E-mail: [e-mail]
Office of Enforcement
US EPA Region 8
8ENF-AT
1595 Wynkoop Street
Denver, CO 80202-1129

Mr. Rik Ombach Via Website: https://utahgov.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3dSxf7JSzy4jwGh
Minor Source Compliance Manager
Permitting and Compliance Division
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820

Dear Mr. Ombach and Ms. North:

SUBJECT: SOURCE TEST NOTIFICATION AND PROTOCOL SUBMISSION
CITATION OIL & GAS CORP.
PINEVIEW TANK BATTERY AND GAS PLANT
PERMIT #DAQE-AN155130002-22
SUMMIT COUNTY, UTAH

In order to demonstrate compliance with UDAQ Permit # DAQE-AN155130002-22 and EPA 40
CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ, Citation Oil & Gas Corp. (Citation) has requested Oasis Emission
Consultants, Inc. (Oasis) to perform source emission testing on one (1) 800 hp White Superior
8G825 engine (ENG 1 – North) located at Citation’s Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant near
Coalville in Summit County, Utah.

The White Superior 8G825 engine is designated as existing, non-emergency, 4SRB stationary
RICE > 500 HP located at an area source of HAP that is not remote and operates more than 24
hours per calendar year. As such, the engine is being tested to demonstrate compliance with the
nitrogen (NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO) performance testing requirements of the UDEA
approval order (DAQE-AN155130002-22). In addition, the engine is being tested in accordance
with the provisions of RICE MACT EPA 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ (NESHAP ZZZZ). Testing
will be conducted to demonstrate compliance with the EPA CO standard of 270 ppmvd @ 15%
O2.

Page 2 of 2
Source Test Notification & Protocol Submission
Pineview Tank Battery & Gas Plant
October 08, 2024
14077 Cutten Road ꞏ Houston, TX 77069-2212 ꞏ 281.891.1000

Oasis is scheduled to conduct the performance testing on the White Superior 8G825 engine on
Thursday, December 12, 2024. We expect to complete all testing within one (1) day.

As indicated in the permit (DAQE-AN155130002-22), two additional 800 hp White Superior
compressor engines (ENG 2 and Recip (South)) are located at this site and are subject to the same
State and Federal performance testing requirements. However, both of these engines are currently
out of service or are inoperable at this time. Therefore, emission testing for these two engines is
not scheduled at this time. If Citation decides to bring these engines back into service, performance
testing will be conducted prior to operation.

Attached is a Source Test protocol for your review.

If you have any questions or require further information, please contact me at [phone] or
via e-mail at [e-mail]

Very truly yours,
R J Redweik
Robert J. Redweik
VP – EHS and Regulatory

Attachment: Source Test Protocol

UDEQ/EPA
Source Test Protocol

Approval Order: DAQE-AN155130002-22

Unit ID: ENG1 (North)

Citation Oil & Gas Corporation
Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant,
Summit County, Utah

October 7, 2024

Prepared By:

Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.
2730 Commercial Way
Rock Springs, WY 82901

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this document is to provide relevant information pertaining to proposed periodic source
emission testing at Citation Oil & Gas Corporation’s Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant (Unit ID: ENG1
(North)), in Summit County, Utah. Emissions testing will be conducted in accordance with the UDEQ DAQ
Approval Order # DAQE-AN155130002-22 (Issuance Date: August 15, 2022) and EPA 40 CFR 63, Subpart
ZZZZ (NESHAP ZZZZ). Testing will be conducted by Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.

1.1 Test Program Organization

Approval Order: DAQE-AN155130002-22

Federal Regulations: EPA 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ
Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant Unit ENG1 (North) is located at an area
source of HAP emissions. The engine is being tested according to the requirements of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (NESHAP) – 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZ.

Facility / Location: Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant (Site ID: 15513)
The facility is located at 3604 East Chalk Creek Road in Coalville,
in Summit County, Utah.
UTM Coordinates: 487,342 m Easting, 4,531,757 m Northing,
UTM Zone 12

Emission Source(s): Unit ID: ENG1 (North) – White Superior 8G825
One (1) natural gas fired, non-emergency, 4-stroke rich burn (4SRB) White
Superior 8G825 stationary reciprocating internal combustion engine (RICE) rated at 800 horsepower (hp).
Client Owner / Operator: Citation Oil & Gas Corporation

Address: 14077 Cutten Road Houston, TX 77069-2212
Contact: Ron Schultz, Manager Regulatory Compliance
Email: [e-mail]
Office: [phone]

Test Company: Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.

Address: 2730 Commercial Way
Rock Springs, WY 82901
Contact: Chris Knott, P.Eng., Director, Engineering & Operations
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

State Authority: Utah Department Of Environmental Quality

Address: PO Box 144820
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820 Contact: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Compliance Manager
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

Stack Test Report Submission: https://utahgov.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3dSxf7JSzy4jwGh
EPA Authority: Office of Enforcement, EPA Region VIII
Address: 8ENF-AT
1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129
Contact: Alexis North, Environmental Scientist
Email: [e-mail] Phone: [phone]
Contact: Michael Stovern
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
R8AirReportEnforcement Region Email:
[e-mail]

1.2 TEST PROJECT OBJECTIVE(S)

The purpose of the emission compliance demonstration is to satisfy the requirements of UDEQ
DAQ Approval Order # DAQE-AN155130002-22 (Issuance Date: August 15, 2022) and EPA
40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ. Testing on the engine to show compliance with the UDEQ DAQ
Approval Order # DAQE-AN155130002-22 and EPA 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ will be
conducted concurrently.

As required by UDEQ DAQ Approval Order # DAQE-AN155130002-22 Conditions II.B.6.c
through II.B.6.c.2, three (3) separate one (1) hour test runs will be conducted on the 4SRB 800
hp White Superior 8G825 engine (Unit ID: ENG1 (North)) to demonstrate compliance with nitrogen oxides (NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO) limitations. The test for NOx and CO will be
performed using EPA Reference Methods 1-3 and EPA 40 CFR 63 (A), Method 320. Results
from the UDEQ DAQ Approval Order # DAQE-AN155130002-22 compliance test will be reported in units of pounds per hour (lb/hr).

The White Superior 8G825 stationary RICE is an affected source equipped with a non-selective
catalytic reduction (NSCR) convertor located at an area source of HAP emissions. The engine is
being tested according to EPA 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ requirements for engines at an area
source that are considered not remote. As stipulated by Table 6 Condition 15 to Subpart ZZZZ
of Part 63, testing will be conducted to demonstrate that the average CO concentration for the
White Superior 8G825 engine is less than or equal to 270 ppmvd @ 15% O2. The engine will be
tested with the FTIR (EPA 40 CFR 63 (A), Method 320) at the outlet for the measurement of
CO.
1.3 Facility Description

Citation Oil & Gas Corporation (Citation) operates a crude oil and natural gas tank battery and
gas plant at the Pineview Facility. At the tank battery, crude oil, natural gas and produced water
are processed from an emulsion stream extracted from wells using electric submersible pumps
and pumping units. Fluid from the wellheads enters a separator where the oil and water are
separated from gas. The separated gas is sent to the adjoining gas plant. The liquids from the
separators are routed to crude oil and produced water storage tanks at the lower portion of the
tank battery. Emissions from the crude oil storage tanks are controlled by a flare. The crude oil
is sent off site via truck loading while the produced water is piped for off-site injection within
the field. Gas is routed to the gas plant. This facility will process up to 146,000 barrels (1 barrel
= 42 gallons) of crude oil per year.

Produced water from the separator is stored on-site at the upper portion of the tank battery
before being shipped off-site through a flowline for injection.

The gas plant processes up to 532.2 million standard cubic feet of natural gas per year. The gas
plant treats the field gas using glycol and a separator to remove any left-over liquids. The gas is
then cooled and compressed for storage in bullet tanks before being piped to the sales point for
truck loading.

The compliance test will be conducted on the 800 hp White Superior 8G825 natural gas fired,
rich-burn engine (Unit ID: ENG1 (North)) that drives a compressor.

2.0 SOURCE TEST PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

2.1 Test Contractor

All source emission tests will be performed by Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc., based out of
Rock Springs and Sheridan, Wyoming. Processed test results and all raw data captured during
the tests are forwarded to Chris Knott, P.Eng., Director of Engineering and Operations and/or
Charles Chapman, Manager of Technical Services, for quality control and data checking. Once
approved, tests are forwarded to the client.

2.2 Test Date

The unit will be tested by Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc. on December 12th, 2024. We expect
to complete all testing within a one (1) day time frame.

2.3 Report Date

The test report will be submitted to Citation Oil & Gas Corporation no later than 60 days
following the test.

2.4 Testing Methodology And Procedures

A summary of the unit to be tested is provided below.

Approval Order # Unit ID Make &
Manufacturer
Serial
Number
Engine
HP
Max
Allowable
Nitrogen
Oxide (NOx)
lb/hr
Max Allowable
Carbon
Monoxide (CO)
lb/hr
DAQE-AN155130002-22 ENG1 (North) White Superior
8G825
270349 800 0.661 1.022

2.4.1 EPA 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ

Unit ID Make &
Manufacturer
Serial
Number
Engine
HP
EPA CO Standard
ENG1 (North) White Superior
8G825
270349 800 270 ppmvd @ 15% O2

The White Superior 8G825 engine is an existing non-emergency 4SRB RICE > 500 HP located
at an area source of HAP and is operated more than 24 hours per calendar year. Testing will be
conducted to demonstrate that the average CO concentration for the White Superior 8G825
engine is less than or equal to 270 ppmvd @ 15% O2.

Emission Measurement Methodologies:

Testing on the White Superior 8G825 compressor engine (Unit ID: ENG1 (North)) will consist
of three one hour tests post catalyst according to EPA 40 CFR 60 (A), Methods 1-3 and EPA 40
CFR 63 (A), Method 320 for NOx and CO. Oxygen levels will be measured to allow for the
correction of CO to 15% O2.

Based on the compounds that will be measured, the MKS 2030 analyzer has been configured in
the following manner, which is intended to cover all types of natural gas fired engines.

The MKS 2030 software provides a Natural Gas Method that is designed to minimize all
expected interferences by removing the regions in the quant region where they are most
absorbed (ie. picket fence approach). So, for example, all the water peaks that are greater than
about 0.1 abs are removed from the quant region. Since the spectral noise measured (sample
spectrum) is in the range of 0.001 absorbance, it is desirable to have any error within this range.
The MKS software will match the water calibration spectrum to the sample spectrum at any 1
point in the spectrum to about 1% precision. So, 1% of 0.1 absorbance is 0.001 abs. This is why
any peaks greater than this for interfering compounds are usually excluded so they do not
interfere. To summarize, the MKS software and the method are designed to minimize any
interferences by removing their largest interfering absorptions.

QA spiking procedures will be followed for pre and/or post testing. Various factors often make
determining the exact concentrations for spiking procedures indiscernible prior to testing, even
if the engine has been previously tested. Furthermore, it is infeasible to obtain and transport a
multitude of gas concentrations for varying analytes. Therefore, a mixed gas bottle with a high

enough concentration for multiple engines may be utilized during the spiking procedures. A
summary of all spiking procedures/results will be provided in the final test reports.

The CO2 present in the native sample will be used as the tracer. There are two components that
make up the spike: 90% native and 10% spike. Both the native and spike are being added to the
gas cell and measured simultaneously. Since the CO2 concentration for most engines is very
stable during testing, the reduction in its concentration when a spike is applied can provide very
accurate prediction on the ratio of spike gas to engine emission.

The schematic for our sampling system, which is the same as the system provided in Method
320, is shown below.

The sampling system is used to draw the sample from the stack at an elevated temperature,
remove particulates and push the gas through a secondary heated line into the MKS 2030
analyzer to maintain correct pressure and temperature. There is no reduction in water
concentration or any other component.

Figure 1: Schematic of FTIR Sampling System.

The MKS Multigas 2030 FTIR system inherently converts the wet levels of NOx & CO to dry
levels and displays the dry levels to the Compliance Specialist(s) via a computer display. The
system is able to perform this conversion due to the FTIR also measuring the moisture content
of the effluent stream. Therefore, it is the dry levels that are typically logged.

Stack Sampling Location

The inner exhaust stack diameter for the White Superior 8G825 engine will be measured by the
Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc. Compliance Specialist during the compliance test and will be
verified to meet the minimum specifications of a sampling location as defined by EPA Method
1. An aerial lift will be utilized, if needed, to conduct sampling.

Figure 2: Sample Location Diagram.

Engine Operating Parameters:

Engine operating parameters, where applicable, will be recorded for each 1 hr test which may
include engine rpm, air/fuel ratio setting(s), suction/discharge pressures etc.

Engine Load Approximation:

Oasis Emission Consultants Inc. will approximate the engine load using the measured process
parameters, such as gas throughput, suction/discharge pressure/temperature; by correlating the
intake manifold conditions with the engine manufacture heat balance data; or the engine load.

It is expected that the engine will be tested at 90%-110% of the site rated load.

Catalyst Parameters:

Oasis will record the catalyst parameters (i.e. catalyst inlet temperature and the pressure drop
across the catalyst) during each test.

Test Methods:

All test methods that we intend to utilize are listed below.

 EPA 40 CFR 60 Appendix A, Method 1: Method 1 requires measurement of the
various physical attributes of a stack to establish appropriate sampling locations.
 EPA 40 CFR 60 Appendix A, Method 2: Method 2 provides the means to calculate the
average wet velocity for the exhaust effluent gas. This method employs the use of a

standard or S-type pitot tube, a thermometer and an inclined manometer. The
temperature, static & differential pressures are all used to calculate the average wet
velocity. This value may be used in conjunction with the known stack diameter, and
measured moisture content (Method 4), to approximate the average dry volumetric flow
rate.
 EPA 40 CFR 60 Appendix A, Method 3: Method 3 provides the means to calculate the
dry molecular weight of the effluent gas. After passing through a gas condenser, O2 &
CO2 gas concentrations from the effluent stream are measured by a Fyrite analyzer.
Measurements will be taken in conjunction with those from Method 2. The dry
molecular weight will be calculated for each of the test runs. The O2 levels will also be
used for the correction to 15% O2.
 EPA 40 CFR 63 (A), Method 320: NOx, CO and H2O concentrations are obtained by
running the engine exhaust through a heated sample line (191 deg C) to an MKS 2030
FTIR analyzer. When a gas sample is introduced in the gas cell, the infrared beam is
partially absorbed by the gas species present. The spectral frequencies absorbed and
their intensity are due to the atoms associated with the chemical bond and the strength of
that bond. The absorption spectrum is unique for each infrared-active gas. The MKS
FTIR analyzer measures the absorption spectrum, and its analysis algorithm measures
the concentration of each gas using pre-loaded calibrations. The MG2000 software
allows for the continuous measurement, display and recording of the sample stream.
ATTACHMENT C
Correspondence

From:[e-mail]
To:Kurt Seeton
Subject:Stack Test Report for Citation Oil & Gas Corp.
Date:Wednesday, October 9, 2024 8:48:10 AM
Thank you for submitting a Stack Test report. A DAQ Inspector will be in contact with you shortly.
Best Regards,
Division of Air Quaility, Complaince Branch
Recipient Data: Time Finished: 2024-10-09 07:47:48 MDTIP: 156.146.145.219ResponseID: R_7LX9PTNzgi4mNmi Link to View Results: Click HereURL to View Results: https://utahgov.iad1.qualtrics.com/apps/single-response-reports/reports/RV4YmKYWlN5YkinV0%2EPCTCL2mwFnZK2w3BrSkOmb3I6DfNNARoQ8saX-sT51QUbSDUio%2EGjUHrtLosrc9r6o4NLEwp7BVf3%2E5Mpz7JQF3lbKEU2CnWaj5S5U4%2E-JS48XAoM-5QFmfOE30GgrahfhX3jxx2z-cscbWObX8qtv6qqzvTuu7Ehi-ESS-rEsPZET6OvA30Z360wqFldjn%2E2jmFqKsGBYj7p1lETen1uF%2Eze8EMrH4bbDrzsjQruseeJadGe2r5DwfKZM-LKqKgV-LqiSCz3iQCINO-Q69ZLC08kZ1ZdO4IaA4n1VNNLwAVSZ65aEaw%2E3-sFplTblTilahQ
Response Summary:
Please provide the following: Company Name: Citation Oil & Gas Corp. Site Name(s): Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant Contact Name: Kurt Seeton Contact Email Address: [e-mail] Permit ID(s): DAQE AN155130002-22 # of Sites: 1 Test Date: 12/12/2024
Please attach a copy of your Stack Test Protocol or Report here: https://utahgov.co1.qualtrics.com/WRQualtricsControlPanel/File.php?F=F_2tEGpc3gIhpcRzn

Stack Test Report Submission
Powered by Qualtrics A
Thank you for submitting your Stack Test.  A Compliance Inspector will contact you
shortly.  
Best Regards,
Division of Air Quality, Complaince Branch
From:Kurt Seeton
To:[e-mail]
Cc:Andrew Moreno; Ron Schultz
Subject:CITATION OIL & GAS CORP. - SOURCE TEST NOTIFICATION AND PROTOCOL SUBMISSION
Date:Wednesday, October 9, 2024 8:56:00 AM
Attachments:2024 10 08 Pineview Tank Battery & Gas Plant Engine Test NOI_FINAL.pdfimage001.jpg
US EPA Region 8/Attention: Ms. Alexis North,
On behalf of Citation Oil and Gas Corp. (Citation), KRS Environmental Services, LLC (KRS)
is submitting the attached Source Test Notification and Protocol Submission for complianceemission testing on one (1) 800 hp White Superior 8G825 engine located at Citation’s
Pineview Tank Battery and Gas Plant near Coalville in Summit County, Utah. Testing isscheduled to be completed on December 12, 2024.
Note that KRS has been informed that EPA Region 8 is requesting that hardcopies of these
reports not be submitted at this time. Therefore, a hardcopy of this report will not be submittedunless requested.
If you have any questions or require further information, please contact Mr. Andrew Moreno
at [phone] or via e-mail at [e-mail].
Regards,

Kurt Seeton
Principal
5816 CR 605
Burleson, TX 76028
(832) 795 - 4336