HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSHW-2025-0003271
1Division of Waste Management and
Radiation Control
Solid Waste Management Program
Mailing Address Office Location Phone (801) 536-0200
P.O. Box 144880 195 North 1950 West Fax (801) 536-0222
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-488 Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 www.deq.utah.gov
APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY PERMIT TO OPERATE AN
EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION WASTE FACILITY
In 2019, the Utah Legislature made changes to the Solid and Hazardous Waste Act, Utah Code § 19-6-
101 et seq., which required jurisdiction over the disposal of Oil and Gas Exploration and Production
Waste move from the Department of Natural Resources’ Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining (DOGM) to the
Department of Environmental Quality’s Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (DWMRC).
In preparation for this regulatory shift, DWMRC has proposed a temporary permitting mechanism for
existing Exploration and Production (E&P) facilities as defined in the proposed Utah Admin. Code R315-
301-2(22)(a).
The proposed rules state that the Director of DWMRC may issue a temporary permit for the purposes of
facilitating the owner’s or operator’s good faith transition from regulation under Utah Admin. Code R649-9
to regulation under Utah Admin. Code R315-321 or R315-322. Applications for temporary permits must
be received by the Director of DWMRC no less than 30 days before October 1, 2024. The temporary
permits will expire one year from the effective date, which is the date the financial assurance mechanism
held by DOGM is transferred to DWMRC.
To complete a temporary permit application to operate an E&P facility, an owner or operator of an existing
E&P facility must:
1. Register the company in DWMRC’s Community Portal and complete facility information within the
Community Portal.
2. Complete the attached Exploration and Production Waste Facility Temporary Permit Application
Form.
3. Provide DWMRC with the following required documentation, to the extent it has not already been
provided to DWMRC or is not already in DWMRC’s possession:
a. Facility map with each landfarm cell, landfill cell, and surface impoundment labeled;
b. Copy of Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining Permit;
c. Copy of Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining Permit Approval/Issuance Letter; and
d. Copy of Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining Bonding (financial assurance).
4. Submit the Application Form and required documentation to DWMRC through the Community
Portal Miscellaneous Document Submission.
5. Within 120 days of DWMRC’s issuance of a temporary permit, the financial assurance
mechanism held by DOGM must be transferred to DWMRC. If the Director issues a temporary
permit, it shall not become effective until the financial assurance mechanism held by DOGM is
transferred to DWMRC. An effective temporary permit is required to operate an E&P Facility
under DWMRC’s jurisdiction.
2
Exploration and Production Waste Facility Temporary Permit Application Form
I. Facility Name and Location
Name of Facility
Danish Flats
Facility Address (Street or Directions to Facility)
CR181
County Grand
City. Cisco Zip Code 84540 Telephone
970-683-8153
Township
T20 S
Range
R24 E
Section
08
Quarter Section
SW
Quarter/Quarter
Section
SW
Main Gate Latitude: 39° 4'35.92"N Longitude: 109°17'31.81"
II. Existing E&P Facilities
☐ Open Landfarm Cell(s)
x Evaporation Pond(s)
Number of Open Landfarm Cells:
Number of Evaporation Ponds: 14
III. Facilities to be Permitted by DWMRC
☐ Landfill Cell(s)
☐ Surface Impoundment(s)
Number of Landfill Cells:
Number of Surface Impoundments:
III. Facility Owner(s) Information
Legal Name of Facility Owner
Jon Goza
Mailing Address
1540 P Road
City
Loma
State
CO
Zip Code
81524
Telephone
970-683-8153
IV. Facility Operator(s) Information
Legal Name of Facility Operator
Danish Flats Waste Solutions
Mailing Address
1540 P Road
City
Loma
State
CO
Zip Code
81524
Telephone
970-683-8153
V. Property Owner(s) Information
Is the property leased? No
Name of Property Owner
Jon Goza
Mailing Address
1540 P Road
City
Loma
State
CO
Zip Code
81524
Telephone
970-683-8153
VI. Designated Contact Information
Facility Owner Designated Contact (if different than
above)
Title
3
Mailing Address
City. State
Zip Code
Telephone
Email Address
Alternative Telephone (cell phone or other)
Facility Operator Designated Contact (if different than
above)
Title
Mailing Address
City
State
Zip Code
Telephone
Email Address
Alternative Telephone (cell phone or other)
Property Owner Contact (if different than above)
Title
Mailing Address
City
State
Zip Code
Telephone
Email Address
Alternative Telephone (cell phone or other)
VII. Waste Types to be Disposed of (check all that
apply) VIII. Facility Area
x Exploration and Production wastes that are exempt from
hazardous waste rules (R315-260-4(b)(5)).
☐ Very Small Quantity Generator hazardous waste
Facility Area: 640 acres
Disposal Area: 87 acres
IX. Application Documents
Indicate documents attached to this application (all are required):
x Facility Map with each landfarm cell, landfill cell, and surface impoundment labeled
x Copy of Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining Permit
x Copy of Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining Approval/Issuance Letter
x Copy of Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining Bonding (Financial Assurance)
1:12,00008001,600 2,400400Feet
Copyright, 2024±
Danish Flats Temporary PermitDanish Flats Disposal FacilityCisco, UTProject Number: 1931-001
Site Location Map
Attachment1
Legend
Surface Empoundments
Site boundary
Facility Enterance
APPENDIX A - FIGURE 5
Site Plan/Evaporation Ponds/Containment 2 & 5
Oilfield Water Logistics
Danish Flats SWD
39.076627 / -109.291579
Grand County, Utah
Map not to scale
LEGEND
Property Boundary
Tertiary Berm Phase II Evaporation Ponds 9-14
Phase I Evaporation Ponds 1-8
Un-named Intermittent Creek
Entrance
Reclaimed Settlement Pond Tank Battery
Office / Shop
1
2 4
11
10 14 12
9
3 5 7
8 6
13
Phase II Evap. Ponds,
Precipitation Only
Containment Needed
Containment 5
Phase I Evap. Ponds
Containment 2
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
RECEIVED: Feb. 09, 2021
$WWDFKPHQW$
$FMM
$FMM
$FMMOBNFTBEEFECZ
5FUSB5FDI
Sundry Number: 108522 Facility Number: 242
State of Utah
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
GARY R. HERBERT
Governor
SPENCER J. COX
Lieutenant Governor
MICHAEL R. STYLER
Executive Director
Division of Oil, Gas and Mining
JOHN R. BAZA
Division Director
Permit to Operate
********************
Facility Name:Danish Flats
Facility Type: Commercial Waste Disposal Facility
Location: Section 8, Township 20S, Range 24E
County:Grand
Approval Date:April 15, 2019
1. Issued to:
Owl Swd Operating, LLC (84195)
2. Authority:
Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. §§ 40-6-1 et seq., and Utah Admin. Code §§ R649-9 et seq., the
Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining (“Division”) issues this Permit to operate an E and P waste
disposal facility.
3. Duration:
This Permit shall expire five years from the Approval Date. The Division may revoke, suspend,
or impose additional operating conditions or limitations on a disposal facility permit at any time,
for good cause, after notice to the operator. The Division may suspend a waste disposal permit or
impose additional conditions or limitations in an emergency to forestall an imminent threat to
fresh water, public health, or safety of the environment. Suspension of a disposal facility permit
may be for a fixed period of time or until the operator remedies the violation or potential
violation. If the Division suspends a disposal facility permit, the disposal facility shall not accept
E and P waste during the suspension period.
4. General:
4.1 Effect on Prior Permits. This Permit supersedes any existing E and P waste disposal permit
previously obtained for the Facility and provides the terms that govern operations at this
Facility.
4.2 Incorporation of Application. The Division issues this Permit in response to OWL’s “Permit
Renewal Application” dated 6/28/2018 and received by the Division on 6/28/2018,
(“Application”). The Facility shall operate in accordance with the best management practices
described in the Application.
4.3 Compliance with Applicable Laws. The Facility shall comply with Utah Code Ann. §§ 40-6-
1 et seq. and Utah Administrative Code §§ R649-9 et seq..
5. Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements:
1594 West North Temple, Suite 1210, PO Box 145801, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5801
telephone (801) 538-5340 x facsimile (801) 359-3940 x TTY (801) 538-7458 x www.ogm.utah.gov
Sundry Number: 95372
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
The Facility shall comply with the reporting and recordkeeping requirements in Utah Admin.
Code § R649-9-11.
6. Modifications:
This Permit only applies to the Facility as it is described in the Application. Any additions to the
Facility or modifications of the waste treatment processes described in the Application are not
allowed and require a permit modification.
7. Enforcement:
The issuance of this permit does not supersede local ordinances, county planning and zoning
requirements, or other permits required to conduct business at the Facility. A copy of this
approval should be kept at the Danish Flats field office, and field personnel shall be aware of the
Conditions of Approval.
8. Approval:
Therefore, having met all the technical permit requirements of Utah Admin. Code §§ R649-9 et
seq., final approval to operate the Facility in accordance with this Permit is hereby granted.
9. Contact Information:
The following are Division of Oil, Gas and Mining contacts and their telephone numbers:
Dayne Doucet, Permit Manager: 801-538-5303
Bart Kettle, Operations Manager: 435-820-0862
Ammon McDonald, Environmental Scientist: 801-538-5337
Approved By:
________________________
By: Dayne Doucet
Title: Permit Manager
Dayne
Doucet
Digitally signed by Dayne Doucet
DN: cn=Dayne Doucet, o=DNR,
ou=DOGM,
email=daynedoucet@utah.gov,
c=US
Date: 2019.04.15 09:01:23 -06'00'
Sundry Number: 95372
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Conditions of Approval:
1. Evaporation Facilities
1.1 A minimum of 2 feet of freeboard shall be maintained in the pit(s) at all times, and that a
method of obviously displaying the freeboard shall be devised and implemented. Utah
Admin. Code § R649-9-4.6.4.
1.2 Pit(s) are to be maintained such that hydrocarbons will not collect on the surface.
Hydrocarbon accumulations, other than de minimis quantities, shall be removed within 24
hours. Utah Admin. Code § R649-9-4.6.4.
1.3 Spraying water to accelerate evaporation should be closely monitored. Overspray outside the
lined pit area is considered a violation. Utah Admin. Code § R649-9-4.9.2.
1.4 The leak detection system must be checked weekly. Any leak must be reported to the
Division immediately, and corrective measures must be taken as directed by the Division.
1.5 The compacted secondary containment berms at the Facility shall be inspected quarterly and
after a major rainstorm or windstorm to ensure integrity Utah Admin. Code § R649-9-11.3.2.
1.6 Evaporation ponds are permitted to accept produced water.
1.7 Phase I ponds 1-8 are permitted to accept RCRA exempt E&P fluids.
1.8 Equipment, tanks, and liners must be visually inspected at least monthly.
1.9 Ground water monitoring shall be conducted at monitoring wells quarterly.
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE ABOVE LISTED CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL MAY RESULT IN CLOSURE OF THE FACILITY.
Sundry Number: 95372
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Oilfield Water Logistics
OWL Danish Flats SWD
Commercial Wastewater Disposal Facility
Utah Division of Oil, Gas & Mining
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
Prepared For
Oilfield Water Logistics
8210 Preston Rd., Suite 520
Dallas, TX 75225
Prepared By
CASE Associates
speters@case-associates.com
JUNE 2018
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. DETAILED SITE DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................... 1
1. FACILITY DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................... 1
2. PROCESS DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................... 1
B. CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT ................................................................................... 2
1. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING CONTAMINATION ........................................................................ 2
2. PROPOSED MONITORING & PREVENTATIVE PRACTICES ........................................................ 4
C. EQUIPMENT ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................ 5
1. DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF EQUIPMENT .................................................................. 5
D. PRACTICES ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................. 7
1. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES & CONTAMINATION MITIGATION ................................................... 7
E. MONITORING PROGRAM ................................................................................................ 8
F. ESTIMATING CLOSURE COSTS & BONDING EVALUATION ...................................... 10
1. PERMITTING & CURRENT BONDING ................................................................................... 10
2. BONDING FOR THE PERMIT RENEWAL PROCESS ................................................................ 11
3. SEEDING & REVEGETATION .............................................................................................. 12
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1. 1 EQUIPMENT INVENTORY .............................................................................................. 5
TABLE 1. 2 FACILITY TANK PARAMETERS ....................................................................................... 5
TABLE 1. 3 CURRENT BONDING SYNOPSIS ................................................................................... 10
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
II
FIGURES
APPENDIX A ........................................................................................................................... 13
Figure 1 General Location Map
Figure 2 Vicinity Map
Figure 3 Land Title Survey
Figure 4 Tank Battery & Headworks As Build
Figure 5 Facility Retention Berms
Figure 6 Site Acreage for Reclamation Evaluation
Figure 7 Current Facility Map with Annotations
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT A .................................................................................................................... 14
Separation Pond Closure Certification Letter
ATTACHMENT B .................................................................................................................... 15
KRW Consulting, Inc. Design & Operations Plan Excerpts
ATTACHMENT C .................................................................................................................... 16
Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Report
ATTACHMENT D .................................................................................................................... 17
Utah DEQ, DWQ Groundwater Discharge Permit, UGW 190002
ATTACHMENT E .................................................................................................................... 18
Email Correspondence with Dan Hall, UDWQ Regarding Bonding
ATTACHMENT F ..................................................................................................................... 19
Cost Estimate for Closure & Post-Closure
ATTACHMENT G .................................................................................................................... 20
NRCS Seeding Recommendations
ATTACHMENT H .................................................................................................................... 21
Section R649-9-13 Variance Request – Removal of Phase II
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
1
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD
A. DETAILED SITE DESCRIPTION
1. Facility Description
OWL Danish Flats SWD (Danish Flats) is located at County Road 181, Cisco, Utah 84540, in
Grand County (Appendix A – Figure 1 & Figure 2). The facility is in Township 20 South, Range
24 East, Section 8, approximately 2.5 miles north of Interstate 70, Exit 214 (Appendix A – Figure
3). The section is owned by Oilfield Water Logistics. Danish Flats accepts exploration and
production (E&P) exempt wastewater from oil and gas producers for disposal by evaporation in
lined evaporation ponds. The Standard Industrial Classification code for the facility is 1389. UTM
coordinates are 648,198 m Easting, 4,327,028 m Northing, UTM Zone 12. The facility has been
in operation since 2008.
In August 2015, Oilfield Water Logistics (OWL) provided specifications to the Utah Division of
Oil, Gas & Mining (DOGM) for closure of six concrete separation vaults and the facilities original
separation pond which was used for solids removal and secondary phase separation. To close
and reclaim the separation pond, sediment was mixed with fresh soil obtained from two
excavated cells adjacent to the separation pond, and the pond was backfilled and compacted.
On March 29, 2017 DOGM provided the signed ‘Separation Pond Closure Certification Letter’
outlining approval that the sludge pond contents had been stabilized and mitigated (Attachment
B).
2. Process Description
Shippers of third-party E&P produced water offload from tanker trucks at one of four offloading
bays located on a cement apron near the new tank battery area. A process diagram for the tank
battery is shown in Appendix A – Figure 4. The tank battery is designed with lined secondary
containment to comply with spill prevention control and countermeasure requirements.
Produced water is pumped to a Desanding Tank designed to capture suspended solids and
consolidate them in one vessel where they are removed for offsite disposal at a facility approved
to accept E&P solid wastes. Produced water gravity flows from the Desanding Tank to four Surge
Tanks. The Surge Tanks provide primary oil/water phase separation for the produced water and
condensate. Any sediment or solids which may have settled in the Surge Tanks are manually
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
2
pumped to a Slop Oil Tank for offsite disposal at a facility approved to accept E&P solid waste.
Separated water then flows to two Gun Barrel tanks for secondary phase separation.
Condensate and recovered oil from the Desanding, Surge, and Gun Barrel tanks is pumped to
the Oil Tanks as additional saleable product for refining.
Five propane-fired generators are used to power the facility. The dual-fuel generators also are
designed to operate using natural gas, which is available intermittently at the site. One 70-
kilowatt (kW) generator powers the facility office. Four 125-kW generators are used on demand
and less than full time to offload trucks and power pumps in the tank battery during its operation.
Seven dual-fuel natural gas/propane-fired process tank heaters are located one each at the Slop
Oil Tank, Gun Barrel tanks, and Oil Tanks.
The entrance to the facility is accessed from CR 181 (also referred to as Cottonwood Wash) and
Agate Oil Field Road, public roads under the jurisdiction of Grand County. Trucks enter the
offloading area at the tank battery directly from the county road. The drive through offloading
area is stabilized with road base material and a concrete apron.
Following primary and secondary phase separation, water flows to lined evaporation ponds.
Phase I evaporation ponds consist of eight approximately 5-acre ponds 1 through 8. Phase II
evaporation ponds consist of an additional six approximately 5-acre ponds 9 through 14 for
increased disposal capacity for E&P produced water. The ponds are shown on Appendix A -
Figure 7. The Phase I ponds have a working level of approximately 8 feet, considering a
maximum freeboard of 2 feet, and a surface area of approximately 1,780,100 square feet. The
Phase II ponds have a working level of approximately 18 feet, considering a maximum freeboard
of 2 feet, and a surface area of approximately 1,365,497 square feet. The ponds were permitted
to accept E&P produced water by DOGM; the Utah Department of Environmental Quality,
Division of Water Quality, and Grand County.
B. CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT
1. Description of Existing Contamination
OWL Danish Flats SWD does not pose a contamination threat to the surrounding environment.
In support of that statement the application will reference three main factors. First, the geology
and hydrology of the site. Next is the characteristics of the waste being managed at the facility,
and finally, the engineering design of the liner system.
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
3
I. Geology & Hydrology
An initial subsurface exploration was performed by KRW Consulting, Inc. (KRW) in June 2007.
Excerpts from the Design and Operations Plan submitted to DOGM are included in Attachment
C. As seen from the highlighted portion of Section 2.d, the facility was constructed in an area
where the Mancos shale is reported to be up to 1,200 feet thick. KRW reported that groundwater
was not observed during test hole activities at the site and that “The Mancos shale is considered
a confining unit that forms a thick barrier to vertical and lateral groundwater flow.”
A geotechnical report was completed for the subject property by Ground Engineering
Consultants, Inc. (Ground) in January 2008, which is included in Attachment D of this report.
Ground reportedly completed 35 test holes to depths ranging from approximately five (5) to ten
(10) feet below ground surface (bgs). Ground reported that sandy, lean clay was observed
beneath surface materials to depths ranging from approximately five (5) to ten (10) feet bgs. This
soils exploration was in addition to borings completed in June 2004. Those earlier borings
extended as deep as approximately 44 feet bgs. Ground reported that occasionally weathered
claystone was observed beneath the sandy, lean clay layer at the bottom of the test holes, which
terminated above the Mancos shale. The Mancos shale is reported to be up to 1,200 feet thick.
Ground reported that groundwater was not observed during test-hole activities at the site.
The facility is engineered with emergency overflow and storm water retention berms (i.e.,
secondary containment) outlined in Appendix A – Figure 5. In the unlikely event of an over flow
or berm failure of the above portion of a pond berm, waters are diverted to the secondary
containment areas. Which include for Phase I a containment area with retention volume of 10-
acre feet and a secondary containment berm surrounds Phase II with a retention volume of
approximately 15-acre feet. The facility has decreased elevation to the southwest where
potential discharge would sheet flow and run to an un-named intermittent creek. The un-named
intermittent creek is located approximately 500 feet south of the southern evaporation ponds.
Due to the distance, the tertiary containment berm, and nature of the closest water body any
potential spills would be remediated before reaching the closest water way.
II. Waste Management
Solid Waste: The facility does not accumulate a large volume of solids. As noted earlier the
separation pond, the source of the largest volume of accumulated solids, was reclaimed in March
2017. In August 2015, OWL provided specifications to DOGM for construction of a new tank
battery at Danish Flats. The tank battery is designed to enhance phased oil and water separation
while increasing solids removal for improved condensate recovery and downstream evaporation
pond water quality. Tank battery construction was completed in March 2016 with construction
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
4
certification provided to DOGM on April 7, 2016. The solids are now contained within a sealed
process as they are transferred to a Slop Oil tank in preparation for off-site disposal before they
have an opportunity of discharging to the ponds.
Hydrocarbon Recovery: As noted the new tank battery system enhances hydrocarbon recovery.
This results in reduced to insignificant discharges of hydrocarbons to the evaporation ponds.
III. Liner System Design
The facilities ponds have been constructed with a composite liner system consisting of a
minimum 6-inch clay underliner with a permeability of 1 x 10-5 cm/sec overlain with a synthetic
primary liner consisting of 60-mil high density polyethylene (HDPE) flexible membrane liner
(FML). The soils at the site are of low permeability and are not expected to transmit liquids even
if a leak occurs in the HDPE liner. The ponds are slightly sloped at a minimum of 0.4% with a
gravel/pipe trench leak detection system at the low end of each pond. A riser access pipe allows
sump water detection measurements and samples to be collected if any leakage is detected in
the sump.
OWL have been proactive in implementing technology to assist in reducing any risk of
environmental contamination at the facility. Over the previous 24-36 months the facility has
undergone extensive remodeling which has included the reclamation of the separation pond and
installation of a modern and progressive tank battery and offloading system. Those initiatives
are considered methods for preventing the risk of contamination at the site.
2. Proposed Monitoring & Preventative Practices
As per R649-9-12 a written closure and post-closure plan will be prepared and submitted to
DOGM, for approval, at least 60 days prior to cessation of operations of the facility. Post-closure
maintenance will be performed, as needed, based on routine inspections and sampling of the
site by the owner's representative, which may include:
• Ponding;
• Dying or dead vegetation;
• Proper drainage;
• Erosion of channels;
• Condition of drainage structures; and
• Sampling and noting condition of groundwater monitoring wells.
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
5
But, as a generalization, inspections of the site shall be conducted at a minimum annual basis.
The exception is that groundwater will be sampled and tested quarterly. The groundwater testing
results, and any deficiencies encountered during the inspections shall be recorded and a memo
will be drafted, then necessary repairs shall be made. The inspection and sampling shall begin
after the closure construction and re-vegetation, and will continue after site closure for a
minimum of 5 years, at which time DOGM will be notified. At that time, DOGM will determine, if
the post-closure period should be extended or if it can cease.
C. EQUIPMENT ASSESSMENT
1. Description and Assessment of Equipment
I. General Facility Inventory
Table 1.1 Equipment Inventory
Source Description Rating/Capacity
Desanding Tank (1) 500 bbl
Surge Tanks (4) 1,000 bbl
Gun Barrel Tanks (2) 500 bbl
Oil Tanks (4) 400 bbl
Slop Oil Tank (1) 400 bbl
Propane Generator (1) 70 KW
Propane Generator (4) 125 KW
Natural Gas/Propane Tank Heaters (7) 0.5 MMBtu/hr
Phase 1 Ponds (8) 310,000 bbl
Phase 2 Ponds (6) 600,000 bbl
Diesel Tank 1,000 gallons
Gasoline Tank 500 gallons
II. Facility Aboveground Storage Tanks
Table 1.2 Facility Tank Parameters
Tank ID Tank
Description
Tank
Size
(bbl)
Tank
Size
(gal)
Estimated
Oil in
Mixture
Tank Shell
Height (ft)
Tank Shell
Diameter
(ft)
Tank Contents
T-1 Surge 1,000 42,000 2 30 15.6 Produced Water
T-2 Surge 1,000 42,000 2 30 15.6 Produced Water
T-3 Surge 1,000 42,000 2 30 15.6 Produced Water
T-4 Surge 1,000 42,000 2 30 15.6 Produced Water
T-5 Oil 400 16,800 95 20 12 Condensate/Oil
T-6 Oil 400 16,800 95 20 12 Condensate/Oil
T-7 Oil 400 16,800 95 20 12 Condensate/Oil
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
6
T-8 Oil 400 16,800 95 20 12 Condensate/Oil
T-9 Gun Barrel 500 21,000 2 25 12 Produced Water
T-10 Gun Barrel 500 21,000 2 25 12 Produced Water
T-11 Slop Oil 400 16,800 80 20 13.6 Condensate/Oil/Solids
T-12 De-Sanding 500 21,000 2 35 10 Produced Water
T-13 Diesel 24 1,000 NA 12 4 Diesel
T-14 Gasoline 12 500 NA 6 4 Gasoline
The service life of the tanks varies pending the manufacturing material and maintenance
schedule. The steel tanks, namely the 2 x Gun Barrel and 4 x Oil tanks, are subject to a 10-year
integrity evaluation as per 40 CFR 112.20 and 112.21. Inspections of the tanks are governed by
the facilities Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan. It obligates the facility to
conduct monthly inspections on the valves, thief hatches, plumbing and piping of the tank
battery, and, to also examine the tanks for leaks. If a tank pinhole is identified then repairs will
be organized through an independent contractor.
The remaining tanks are manufactured from fiberglass which is a product known for its durability
and longevity, but also, ease of maintenance and repair. The tanks are documented as having
superior service life of 30 years’ maintenance free, even when managing liquids of a corrosive
nature.
III. Evaporation Ponds
Phase 1: Eight (8) x 600 ft x 400 ft x 10 ft
Phase II: Six (6) x 600 ft x 400 ft x 20 ft
Water resulting from the separation process is routed to lined evaporation ponds. Phase I
evaporation ponds consist of eight 5-acre ponds (1 through 8), each with a working level of
approximately 8 feet and maximum freeboard of 2 feet. Phase II evaporation ponds consist of
an additional six 5-acre ponds (9 through 14), each with a working level of approximately 18 feet
and maximum freeboard of 2 feet. The average annual evaporation rate for the area, according
to the Western Regional Climate Center near Moab, Utah, is 66.6 inches per year.
The HDPE liner is acknowledged as having a minimum service life of twenty (20) to thirty (30)
plus years and is well suited for its purpose as it is UV resistant and chemical resistant. The
integrity of the HDPE liner is visually inspected on a weekly basis and the results recorded on
the appropriate inspection log. The pond floors slope toward a sump that is fitted with a
monitoring pipe. The leak detection system for each pond is inspected and data recorded on a
weekly basis.
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
7
IV. Generators
Generators on site are fueled using propane. The dual-fuel generators also are designed to
operate using natural gas, which is available intermittently at the site. There are four 125-kW
generators and one 70-kW generator. The 70-kW generator operates continuously. The 125-kW
generators operate as needed during produced water offloading operations. Both come with a
guarantee of extended service life form the manufacturer.
V. Tank Heaters
Tank heaters will be operated for the four Oil tanks, the two Gun Barrel tanks, and the Slop Oil
tank. The seven 0.5-MMBtu/hr tank heaters are dual fuel and can use natural gas or propane.
D. PRACTICES ASSESSMENT
1. Management Practices & Contamination Mitigation
In the previous few years Danish Flats has introduced modern technology which has assisted in
eliminating manual practices, manual handling and risk of produced water and hydrocarbon
spills. The introduction of industrial automation at the site has provided the following primary
benefits:
I. Automated Produced Water Off-Loading
Incoming delivery drivers can only activate the off-loading pumps by entering a unique driver ID
code in to the automation system (kiosk). The automation system obtains a photograph of the
driver and a scan of the water ticket to ensure correctness with the ID code and product being
delivered. Once the system is satisfied the correct procedures have been followed the driver is
able to return to their truck, manually connect the hose and start the off-load pumps. This
protects the facility from unauthorized unloading and ensures electronic tracking of all incoming
water to the site.
II. Automated Tank Battery Management
The industrial automation system monitors all fluids in the tank battery through high-precision
sensors which pass on real time updates and emergency alerts to the nominated subscribers.
The benefits include:
• Eliminating manual tank gauging
• Wed-based data tracking
• Flow and pressure readings to monitor pumps, flow lines, and vessels.
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
8
• Real-time updates to desktop and mobile devices to assist in immediate response
• Reduces or eliminates spills
When combining the tank battery automation with the newly installed OSHA and State approved
corrugated iron secondary containment the site has implemented practices which should provide
reassurance regarding the mitigation of contamination. The secondary containment has also
been underlain with a 40-mil HDPE liner, with the joins welded and pipe intrusions sprayed with
an epoxy resin, to deliver a water tight structure. The design of the site today is meeting the
highest of technological and environmental standards.
E. MONITORING PROGRAM
1. Leak Detection System & HDPE Liner
The evaporations ponds are designed with a leak detection system to assist in monitoring
potential integrity failures of the HDPE liner. The leak detection system is inspected and data
recorded on a weekly basis. A summary of the weekly inspections is reported to the State on a
quarterly term. If necessary, sump pumps are available on site to evacuate the sumps. As per
the ‘Final Approval to Operate’, issued by DOGM for each pond, if a leak is identified then DOGM
will be notified immediately and corrective action initiated.
The HDPE liner is also subject to a visual weekly inspection and recorded on the LDS inspection
document.
2. Tank Battery & Off-Loading System
Visual inspections of the tanks, piping, valves, thief hatches, connections, pumps and secondary
containment is conducted during routine shifts. A formal recorded inspection is completed each
month and filed with the facility records.
3. Separation Pond Reclamation Monitoring
The three (3) cells created during remediation of the separation pond have entered the post
closure period. “Keep Off” signs have been posted in an effort to keep vehicular and foot traffic
off the closed cells. The monitoring wells are checked quarterly and if apparent groundwater is
observed in the wells in quantities sufficient for sampling, groundwater samples are collected for
chemical analyses. Those samples will be analyzed for TEPH, TVPH, EC, SAR and ESP.
Monitoring of the cells is conducted and documented, at a minimum, on a quarterly basis.
Monitoring shall focus on erosion of the cover, condition of the gravel layer, and evenness of
grades and plant growth. Cover repairs and maintenance as well as the results of groundwater
well monitoring shall be documented in an annual report to be submitted to DOGM. The
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
9
monitoring shall begin after the closure construction and re-vegetation, and will continue during
the post-closure period for a minimum of five (5) years, at which time the DOGM will be notified.
At that time, the DOGM will determine if the post-closure period should be extended or if it can
cease.
4. Groundwater Monitoring
Presently the groundwater monitoring associated with the site is the quarterly monitoring linked
with the post-closure requirements of the separation pond. Due to the geology and hydrology of
the site and no record of contamination in 10 years of operations, no further groundwater
monitoring is recommended.
5. Air Emissions
As per the Utah Division of Air Quality Approval Order the facility is required to track emissions
through a rolling 12-month emissions inventory. This includes the requirement of obtaining
monthly samples of the wastewater being discharged from the tank battery to the evaporation
ponds.
6. E&P Exempt Wastewater
All E&P exempt wastewater is accounted for from sales tickets and electronic tracking through
the industrial automation system. The volumes are reported to DOGM each quarter.
7. Hydrocarbons Sales
All hydrocarbons transported off the facility is accounted for from sales tickets. The volumes are
reported to DOGM each quarter.
8. Industrial Automation
Provides accurate data as to the volumes and levels of fluids or solids in the tank battery. The
automation system has the ability to disseminate live updates outlining the behavior of the
system managing the liquids and solids at the site.
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
10
F. ESTIMATING CLOSURE COSTS & BONDING EVALUATION
1. Permitting & Current Bonding
Presently the facility is bonded through DOGM. A unique situation exists where the Phase II
ponds, numbers nine (9) to fourteen (14), are dual permitted to potentially accept two different
waste streams. Under the DOGM permit the ponds are approved to receive E&P produced
water. But Phase II also operates under the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division
of Water Quality (UDWQ), Groundwater Discharge Permit, UGW190002, permitted to receive
non-hazardous low and high salinity fluids (Attachment E). A condition of the UDWQ permit is
that the storage and evaporation of petroleum E&P wastes is limited to Phase I evaporation
ponds under the jurisdiction of DOGM. The facility has complied with this condition since
issuance of the UDWQ permit on October 09, 2014.
DOGM have requested that the 2018 permit renewal process eliminate the situation where the
Phase II ponds are dual permitted. OWL have determined its preference to move forward and
remove the Phase II ponds from DOGM bonding. Advice was obtained from UDWQ Manager,
Dan Hall P.G., who advised via email the Utah DEQ/DWQ does not have bonding authority.
Further the position of the UDWQ is that this part of the facility, referencing Phase II, does not
allow for the acceptance of oil and gas waste and therefore does not fall under the DOGM’s
jurisdiction (Attachment F). This application will therefore endeavor to outline a bonding scope
for the facility excluding Phase II which will default to the UDWQ authority. A variance request,
under R649-9-13, has been submitted with the application to formalize the modification
(Attachment H).
The facility has been constructed in phases since 2007. Oilfield Water Logistics assumed all
liabilities regarding the bonds commencing October 20, 2014. A breakdown of the current
bonding status, where DOGM have been named as the ‘Obligee,’ is outlined below:
Table 1.3 Current Bonding Synopsis
POND # DATE BONDED BOND # AMOUNT
Separation Pond &
Concrete Vaults Reclaimed March 29, 2017
Pond One (1) 12/13/2012 SUR0020547 $170,000.00
Pond Two (2) 12/13/2012 SUR0020546 $170,000.00
Pond Three (3) 12/13/2012 SUR0020545 $149,130.00
Pond Four (4) 12/13/2012 SUR0020544 $149,130.00
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
11
2. Bonding for the Permit Renewal Process
As previously outlined OWL Danish Flats SWD is located in section 8. When breaking the section
to a quarter-quarter section and overlaying it to an aerial view of the facility a conservative
calculation assumes that approximately 300 of the 640 acres has been disturbed (Appendix A –
Figure 6). Relevant to this permit renewal application is the soil disturbance to Phase I. The
bonded acreage includes the Phase I ponds, the tank battery, site office and offloading bays,
soil stockpiles, internal facility roads, storm water channels, containment walls, the perimeter
fence and the previously reclaimed separation pond. In total the soil disturbance to Phase I is
approximately 155 acres.
Bonding estimates have been calculated through reliance on RS Means as well as current
proposals from contractors. The ‘Notes’ section of the ‘Cost Estimate for Closure & Post-Closure
(Attachment H) provides a comment which outlines the source referenced to arrive at the
bonding estimate for that particular line item. The line item estimates include labor and
equipment unless otherwise stated.
In respect to contamination. The bonding estimate has considered soil samples in two (2)
separate locations at the base of each pond to assess for potential contamination. Those soil
samples will be analyzed for TEPH, TVPH, EC, SAR and ESP.
Pond Five (5) 12/13/2012 SUR0020543 $149,130.00
Pond Six (6) 11/06/2012 SUR0020536 $149,130.00
Pond Seven (7) 11/06/2012 SUR0020536 $149,130.00
Pond Eight (8) 11/06/2012 SUR0020536 $149,130.00
Pond Nine (9) 11/06/2012 SUR0020535 $233,130.00
Pond Ten (10) 11/06/2012 SUR0020534 $233,130.00
Pond Eleven (11) 11/06/2012 SUR0020533 $233,130.00
Pond Twelve (12) 12/13/2012 SUR0020548 $233,130.00
Pond Thirteen (13) 12/13/2012 SUR0020549 $233,130.00
Pond Fourteen (14) 11/06/2012 SUR0020550 $233,130.00
TOTAL $2,633,560.00
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
12
3. Seeding & Revegetation
The facility recently reclaimed the separation pond. Expert opinion was obtained from Shane
Green, the Natural Resources Conservation Service Utah State Rangeland Specialist (NRCS)
regarding the seeding and revegetation requirements. The recommendations were provided in
a letter to Oilfield Water Logistics dated May 09, 2016 (Attachment I). Oilfield Water Logistics
will duplicate the recommendations provided by the NRCS for the seeding and revegetation of
Phase I. Those recommendations include advice on seed mix, soil preparation, method of
application, rates of application, time of seeding and watering requirements.
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewals
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
13
APPENDIX A
FIGURES
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Not to Scale
Project Site
Appendix A - Figure 1
General Location Map
OWL Danish Flats SWD
Grand County, Utah
Grand Junction
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Undeveloped
Area
Undeveloped
Area
Undeveloped
Area
Undeveloped
Area
Undeveloped
Area
Appendix A - Figure 2
Vicinty MapOWL Danish Flats SWD
Grand County, Utah
Scale = 1 : 24 000
Project Site
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
7'6"
12' X 20'
Oil
Tank
12' X 20'
Oil
Tank
13'6" X 20'
Slop Oil
Tank
12' X 25'
Gun Barrel
Tank
12' X 25'
Gun Barrel
Tank
74'
Danish Flats As Build Created for:
Oilfield Water
LogisticsCreated: 3/24/2016
Danish Flats
***NOTHING TO SCALE***
Aerial View
Road
68.5'
50'
38'
Ma
i
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
Light PoleElectric Box
Cement Pad (See
Figure #2)
2'
10' X 35'
De-Sanding
Tank
15'6" X 30'
Surge
Tank
Manifold Housing
15'6" X 30'
Surge
Tank
15'6" X 30'
Surge
Tank
15'6" X 30'
Surge
Tank
12' X 20'
Oil
Tank
12' X 20'
Oil
Tank
Pump Shed
7'10"
6'11"
24'4"
22'10"
3'3"
5'9"
5'4"
Electric Line
Underground
Load Lines
128'
2'10"2'6"
2'10"2'6"
7'7"8'
40'
6"
84'6"
7'7"8'
24'10"
21'8"
2'6"
8'
5'
9'9"
12'3"
3'5"
20'3"
12'3"
9'
5'
5'11"
7'
7'9"
10'
4'
4'
5'11"
5'10"6'
6'
6'6'
12'11"12'11"
14'14'8"
56'
4'
12'11'
Supply Gas Line
Electric Riser Supply Gas Riser
88'
Underground
Supply Gas
(Only 6" Deep to
Containment)
Key
Cement Pad (See
Figure #1)
Water Line
Risers Into
De-Sanding Tank
Water Line Riser
Doors (1 Regular, 1
Garage)
Cement Pad
(Above Ground)
Generators
Generators
LPG
Tanks
LPG
Tanks
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
APPENDIX A - FIGURE 5
Site Plan/Evaporation Ponds/Containment 2 & 5
Oilfield Water Logistics
Danish Flats SWD
39.076627 / -109.291579
Grand County, Utah
Map not to scale
LEGEND
Property Boundary
Tertiary Berm Phase II Evaporation Ponds 9-14
Phase I Evaporation Ponds 1-8
Un-named Intermittent Creek
Entrance
Reclaimed Settlement Pond Tank Battery
Office / Shop
1
2 4
11
10 14 12
9
3 5 7
8 6
13
Phase II Evap. Ponds,
Precipitation Only
Containment Needed
Containment 5
Phase I Evap. Ponds
Containment 2
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
OWL DANISH FLATS SWD
SECTION 8
640 acres
QUARTER -QUARTER SECTIONS
40 acres
Acreage for Reclamation
Phase I: 155 acres
Phase II: 145 acres
JUNE 23, 2018
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Danish Flat Rd
CR
1
8
1
Agate
O
i
lfie
l
d
R
o
a
d
Phase 1
Evaporation
Ponds
Phase 2
Evaporation
Ponds
Tank Battery
Area
0 400 800
Feet
³
\\
E
C
S
S
1
3
4
F
S
0
1
\
B
O
U
-
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
B
L
D
0
1
\
7
4
5
5
0
0
1
_
O
I
L
F
I
E
L
D
W
A
T
E
R
L
O
G
I
S
T
I
C
S
\
D
A
N
I
S
H
F
L
A
T
S
\
G
I
S
\
O
W
L
_
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
Y
_
L
O
C
_
M
A
P
.
M
X
D
www.tetratech.com
Project No.:
Date:
Designed By:
OWL DANISH FLATS SWD
7
FACILITY MAP Figure No.
117-7455001
OCT 04, 2016
ES
4900 Pearl E. Cir., Suite 300W
Boulder, Colorado 80301
PHONE: (720) 406-9110Service Layer Credits: Google Earth
Cisco, UT
Facility Location
§¨¦I-70
OWL Danish
Flats SWD
T20S R24ET20S R23E
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewals
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
14
ATTACHMENT A
SEPARATION POND CLOSURE CERTIFICATION LETTER
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
GARY R. HERBERT
Governor
SPENCER J. COX
Lieutenant Governor
State of Utah
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
1594 West North Temple, Suite 1210, PO Box 145801, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5801
telephone (801) 538-5340 • facsimile (801) 359-3940 • TTY (801) 538-7458 • www.ogm.utah.gov
MICHAEL R. STYLER
Executive Director
Division of Oil, Gas and Mining
JOHN R. BAZA
Division Director
March 29, 2017
Oilfield Water Logistics
Johnstown, Regional Office
P.O. Box 670
Windsor, CO 80550
ATTN: Seth Peters
SUBJECT: Re: OWL Danish Flats SWD: Sludge Pond Closure Certification letter dated
February1, 2017
Dear Mr. Peters:
The Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining (Division) has received a Certification Letter with
corresponding attachments, a letter to Grand County Recorder’s Office, Himes Drilling Company Inc
daily drilling reports for monitoring wells and seed tags. These documents have been accepted and
placed into the facility file.
Through performing site visits during Sludge Pit closure and a review of provided documentation,
the Division concludes OWL has achieved objectives set forth in the August 14, 2015 Closure Plan,
March 31, 2016 Request to Amend Sludge Pond Closure Plan, and June 10, 2016 Tetra Tech Technical
Memorandum. As observed and reviewed, the implemented Sludge Pond Closure actions are expected to
mitigate risk materials would have posed to human health, safety and the environment. Therefore, the
Division has determined Sludge Pond contents are stabilized and mitigated.
If you have questions feel free to contact me at (435) 820-0862.
Sincerely,
Bart Kettle
Environmental Scientist
bk/dj/js
cc: Dan Jarvis, Operations Manager
Brad Hill, Permitting Manger
Ammon McDonald, Environmental Scientist
Facility File
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewals
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
15
ATTACHMENT B
KRW CONSULTING, INC. DESIGN & OPERATIONS PLAN EXCERPTS
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
1011007.3
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
1011007.3
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
1011007.3
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
1011007.3
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
1011007.3
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
1011007.3
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
1011007.3
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
1011007.3
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
1011007.3
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewals
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
17
ATTACHMENT D
UTAH DEQ, DWQ GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT, UGW190002
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Si
SI
State of Utah
GARY R. HERBERT
Governor
SPENCER J. COX
Lieutenant Governor
Department of
Environmental Quality
Amanda Smith
Executive Director
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Walter L. Baker, P.E.
Director
ument Date 10/9/2014
OCT 0 9 2014
DWQ-2014-013399
Justin Spaeth
Danish Flats Environmental Services
4775 Larimer Parkway, Suite 200
Johnstown, CO 80534
Dear Mr. Spaeth:
Subject: Issuance of Utah Ground Water Discharge Permit for the Danish Flats
Environmental Services Phase 2 Evaporation Ponds
The 30-day public comment period closed on October 6, 2014 for draft Ground Water Discharge
Permit UGW190002. No public comments from the public were received during the comment
period. The Ground Water Discharge Permit and Statement of Basis are enclosed. An invoice is
also enclosed for the legislative mandated fee of $2,250 for 25 hours of staff time preparing the
permits. Therefore, please remit $2,250 within 30 days from receipt to:
Attn: Stacy Carroll
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Quality
P.O.Box 144870
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4870
Please be sure to include the invoice number with your remittance.
We value your feedback to help us improve the permitting process to better meet your needs.
Please go to http://www. waterqual it v.Utah, go v/ and take a few minutes to complete our customer
feedback form (Give Feedback on the left side of the web page).
195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144870 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4870
Telephone (801) 536-4300 *Fax (801) 536-4301 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4414
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
If you have any questions or comments about the permit, please contact Ed Hickey at
ehickev@utah.gov or (801) 536-4357.
Sincerely,
Leah Ann Lamb
Assistant Director
LAL:DJH:EPH:mc
Enclosures: 1. UGW190002 Permit (DWQ-2014-013187
2. UGW190002 Statement of Basis (DWQ-2014-0131
3. Invoice
DWQ-2014-013186
195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144870 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4870
Telephone (801) 536-4300 • Fax (801) 536-4301 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4414
www.cieq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
STATEMENT OF BASIS
GROUND WATER DISCHARGE PERMIT UGW190002
Danish Flats Environmental Services
Evaporation Ponds
Grand County, Utah
October 2014
Purpose
Danish Flats Environmental Services has constructed lined evaporation ponds to contain and
evaporate fresh and saline fluids obtained from a variety of ground water and surface water
sources. This Ground Water Discharge Permit will require best available technology and
compliance monitoring for 6 evaporation ponds. The facility is located in the Danish Flats area
2.5 miles north of 1-70 interchange Exit 212, approximately 43 miles west of the Utah-Colorado
border, in Section 8, Township 20 South, Range 24 East, in Grand County, Utah. The property is
privately owned. The Danish Flats area is a desert landscape that gradually slopes to the
southeast.
Site Geology and Hydrogeology
Geology
The Danish Flats area is part of the Greater Cisco area and is located in the Mancos Shale
lowlands where weathered Mancos Shale is exposed at the surface over most of the area. Based
on site boring logs from a geotechnical investigation, the site-specific geology consists of 15 to
40 feet of silty clay derived from and underlain by the Mancos Shale Formation. The Mancos
Shale Formation is a marine deposit consisting of gray, thin-bedded, fissile shale ranging from
3,500 feet thick in western Grand County to 4,000 feet thick near the Utah-Colorado border
(BLM, 2003). Soils associated with the Mancos Shale are alkaline and may have high
concentrations of selenium. As a result, surface water in ephemeral washes is likely to have high
salinity, high turbidity, considerable hardness, and elevated levels of sulfate and selenium. The
Mancos Shale is between 900 and 1,000 feet thick in the Danish Flats area.
Hydrogeology
Shallow ground water in the Greater Cisco area is limited to alluvial deposits along ephemeral
washes and drainages. There are no major watercourses on or near the project site. Ground water
was not encountered in any of the Danish Flats site soil borings. Therefore, the first ground water
that would be encountered would be in discontinuous sandstone channel lenses within the
Mancos Shale. The Mancos Shale overall does not yield ground water and forms an effective
aquitard that inhibits ground water migration. Ground water that comes in contact with the
Mancos Shale typically contains very high total dissolved solids concentrations due the high
content of sulfate. Potential aquifers below the Mancos Shale are discontinuous stream channel
sandstones of the Dakota, Cedar Mountain, and Morrison formations. However, these sandstones
are the hydrocarbon reservoirs for oil and gas production in the Greater Cisco area and any
ground water contained in them would most likely be saline. This is supported by the hydrostatic
gradient in Dakota and Morrison hydrocarbon reservoirs in and the presence of saline water in the
Morrison Formation near Cisco. A search of the Utah Division of Water Rights data base
indicates no water wells have been drilled within a 5-mile radius of the project site.
1
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Ground Water Quality
Ground Water Classification
As indicated by the site geology and hydrogeology above, the presence of at least 900 feet of
Mancos Shale coupled with the absence or poor quality of shallow ground water beneath the site
indicate a very low risk and low vulnerability to ground water quality. The site is assigned Class
IV Protection Levels based on the lack of a shallow aquifer and the characteristics of the Mancos
Shale.
Class IV Protection Levels
In accordance with UAC R317-6-4.7, Class IV ground water protection levels are established to
protect human health and the environment.
Best Available Technology (BAT)
The composite liner system consists of a 6-inch clay underliner with a permeability of IxlO"5
cm/sec overlain by a 60-mil HDPE primary synthetic liner. Although the permeability of the clay
underliner is an order of magnitude greater than the DWQ municipal lagoon clay liner
specification, the primary liner is a 60-mil HDPE instead of the typical 40-mil HDPE synthetic
liner. In addition to the safety factor provided by the 60-mil primary liner, a leak detection
system has been installed. The ponds are slightly sloped at a minimum of 0.4% with a gravel/pipe
trench leak detection system at the low end of each pond under the clay and FML liners. A riser
access pipe from the trench is used for leak detection sump inspection. A perimeter berm was
also constructed to prevent any surface water from entering or leaving the Phase 2 complex.
BAT Performance Monitoring
Source Water Monitoring
Non-hazardous low and high salinity fluids will be placed into the ponds and evaporated. Regular
pond water sample collection is not a condition of this permit. However, the operator will obtain
laboratory analyses of any proposed discharge water of unknown character prior to placement
into the ponds. Excepting dissolved metals in water, hazardous or radioactive waste materials
cannot be discharged into the Phase 2 ponds without a permit amendment, as these wastes are
subject to other DEQ disposal regulations. Storage and evaporation of petroleum E&P wastes is
limited to Phase 1 evaporation ponds under the jurisdiction of DOGM.
Best Available Technology Monitoring
BAT monitoring will include minimum vertical freeboard, leak detection sump monitoring, and
maximum allowable head monitoring. These performance standards are based on the precedence
of previous ground water discharge permits and Action Leakage Rates For Leak Detection
Systems (EPA, January 1992).
Minimum Vertical Freeboard
A minimum of 36 inches of vertical freeboard shall be maintained to ensure total containment of
untreated mine water and filter backwash.
Leak Detection Sump Monitoring
Monitoring of the sumps w ill be conducted on a monthly basis throughout the term of the permit.
Detection of any sump fluids will be recorded and reported.
2
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Maximum Allowable Head
Any fluids collected in the leak detection sump will be pumped back to the evaporation pond so
that the water level in the leak detection sump is always less than one foot. In the event that the
leak detection system has flows or heads that exceed the BAT performance standards of the
permit, a BAT failure exists and the permittee will be required to regain BAT by a number of
solutions including identifying and repairing the liner leak.
Potential Impacts to Ground Water
Potential impacts to ground water have been minimized by employing best available technology
for the Evaporation Ponds. The Division of Water Quality will provide periodic onsite inspections
during construction and operation of the facilities described above. The BAT performance
monitoring plan, which the permittee is required to be submitted to the Director, will ensure that
the facility is operated in accordance with design specifications and will also ensure that any
indications of facility problems will be detected early and resolved.
Compliance Schedule Items
BAT Performance Monitoring Plan
The Permittee shall submit a BAT monitoring plan to the Director and secure approval of the
plan. The plan will include all procedures and methods sufficient to ensure compliance with the
BAT performance standards of Part I.D.3 of the permit, including minimum vertical freeboard of
the ponds, maximum allowable leakage rate and maximum allowable head for the Evaporation
Pond leak detection system. The approved document will become an enforceable Appendix C to
this permit.
Reference Cited:
R.D. Hettinger and Mark A. Kirschbaum, 2003, Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Mancos Shale
(Upper Part) and Mesaverde Group in the Southern Part of the Uinta and Piceance Basins, Utah and
Colorado, Chapter 12 of U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-B
http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-069/dds-069-b/REPORTS/Chapter_12.pdf
3
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
F STATE OF UTAH
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY BOARD
P.O. BOX 144870
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-4870
Ground Water Discharge Permit
Permit No. UGW190002
In compliance with the provisions of the Utah Water Quality Act, Title 19, Chapter 5, Utah Code
Annotated 1953, as amended, the Act,
hereafter referred to as the Permittee, is granted a Ground Water Discharge Permit for a fluids disposal
facility for evaporation of wastewater in Grand County, Utah. The evaporation pond facility is located at
Latitude 39° 04' 36.44" North, Longitude 109° 17* 28.69" West on the following tracts of land (Salt Lake
Base and Meridian):
This permit is based on representation made by the Permittee and other information contained in the
administrative record. It is the responsibility of the Permittee to read and understand all provisions of this
permit.
The facility shall be constructed and operated in accordance with conditions set forth in the permit and the
Utah Administrative Rules for Ground Water Quality Protection (UAC R317-6).
Danish Flats Environmental Services
4775 Larimer Parkway, Suite 200
Johnstown, CO 80534
in Section 8, Township 20 South, Range 24 East in Grand County, Utah
Leah Ann Lamb
Acting Director
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ii
PART I SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1
A. Ground Water Classification 1
B. Background Ground Water Quality 1
C. Ground Water Protection Levels 1
D. Best Available Technology (BAT) Standard 1
F. Non-Compliance Status 3
G. Reporting Requirements 4
H. Compliance Schedule 4
PART II MONITORING, RECORDING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 6
A. Representative Sampling 6
B. Analytical Procedures 6
C. Penalties for Tampering 6
D. Reporting of Monitoring Results 6
E. Compliance Schedules 6
F. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee 6
G. Records Contents 6
H. Retention of Records 6
I. Twenty-four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting 7
J. Other Noncompliance Reporting 7
K. Inspection and Entry 7
PART III COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITIES 8
A. Duty to Comply 8
B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions 8
C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense 8
D. Duty to Mitigate 8
E. Proper Operation and Maintenance 8
PART IV GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 9
A. Planned Changes 9
B. Anticipated Noncompliance 9
C. Permit Actions 9
D. Duty to Reapply 9
E. Duty to Provide Information 9
F. Other Information 9
G. Signatory Requirements 9
H. Penalties for Falsification of Reports 10
I. Availability of Reports 10
J. Property Rights 10
K. Severability 11
L. Transfers 11
M. State Laws 11
N. Reopener Provision 11
ii
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Parti
Permit No. UGW 190002
PART I SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
A. GROUND WATER CLASSIFICATION
Based on information submitted in the permit application, ground water at the Danish
Flats Environmental Services evaporation pond site is defined as Class IV Saline Ground
Water.
B. BACKGROUND GROUND WATER QUALITY
There are no shallow, continuous, permeable aquifers in the Mancos Shale underlying the
site. The presence of at least 900 feet of Mancos Shale, coupled with the absence or poor
quality of shallow ground water beneath the site, indicate a very low vulnerability and
low risk to ground water quality.
C. GROUND WATER PROTECTION LEVELS
The site is assigned Class IV Protection Levels based on the lack of a shallow aquifer and
the characteristics of the Mancos Shale. In accordance with UAC R317-6-4.7, Class IV
ground water protection levels are established to protect human health and the
environment.
D. BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (BAT) STANDARD
1. Authorized Construction - The Danish Flats Environmental Services site is
designed and operated as a non-discharging facility. Six ponds constructed
during Phase 2 are authorized by this permit. Each pond is approximately 5.5
acres in size (600ft x 400 ft). Ancillary features permitted by rule: six concrete
acceptance pits and one sludge pond.
2. Design and Construction - The composite liner system for each pond consists of
a 6-inch clay underliner, a 60-mil HDPE primary synthetic liner, and leak
detection sump.
Approved construction elements include:
a. Subgrade Preparation - the subgrade has been scarified and recompacted
to 95% on the Standard Proctor Scale (ASTM D698) prior to clay
placement.
b. Clay underliner - the clay underliner is 6 inches thick and has a
compacted permeability of lxl 0"5 cm/sec.
c. 60-mil HDPE Primary Liner - a 60-mil high density polyethylene liner is
installed immediately above the clay subliner in accordance with the
construction quality assurance/quality control manual approved by the
Construction Permit.
d. Leak Detection Sump - The pond bases are slightly sloped at a minimum
of 0.4% and a gravel filled leak detection sump is constructed beneath
the lowest section of each evaporation pond under the primary HDPE
liners and clay underliner. A riser access pipe allows sump water
detection measurements and samples to be collected if any leakage is
detected in the sump.
1
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Parti
Permit No. UGW 190002
h. Perimeter Berm - a secondary containment berm was constructed above
surrounding grade along the low end of the Phase 2 ponds (southeast
side) to contain the catastrophic failure of one pond volume (20 acre-
feet).
3. BAT Performance Monitoring - Best available technology monitoring will
include minimum vertical freeboard, maximum allowable leakage rate, and
maximum allowable head monitoring. These performance standards are based
on the precedence of previous ground water discharge permits and Action
Leakage Rates for Leak Detection Systems (EPA, January 1992).
a. Minimum Vertical Freeboard - a minimum of 36 inches of vertical
freeboard shall be maintained to ensure total containment of the
evaporation/surge pond and peripheral ditches.
b. Maximum Allowable Leakage Rate - the maximum allowable leakage rate
through the primary HDPE liner of an evaporation pond is 200 gallons per
acre per day. The allowable leakage rate per pond is shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Allowable
Construction
Phase
2
,eakage Rate (ALR)
Approximate Liner
area (acres) per pond
5^5
Allowable Leakage
Rate per pond
(gallons per day)
uoo
Any fluids collected in the leak detection sump will be removed and placed
back into the pond.
c. Maximum Allowable head in any pond sump is 1.0 foot.
4. Spill Containment - The permittee shall maintain all pipelines, delivery pads,
storage tanks, and pond facilities with a spill containment system that shall:
a. Prevent any spills or leakage from any contact with the ground surface or
ground water.
b. Convey all spills or leakage to an evaporation pond.
Any spill that does come into contact with the ground surface or ground water
that causes pollution or has the potential to cause pollution to waters of the state
shall be reported in accordance with Part 11.1.
5. Monitoring Well Construction - Monitoring wells are not a permit compliance
requirement as there is no shallow groundwater underlying the site.
2
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Parti
Permit No. UGW 190002
E. Compliance Monitoring Requirements
Non-hazardous low and high salinity fluids will be placed into the ponds and evaporated.
Regular pond water sample collection is not a condition of this permit. However, the
operator will obtain laboratory analyses of any proposed discharge water of unknown
character prior to placement into the ponds. Excepting dissolved metals in water,
hazardous or radioactive waste materials cannot be discharged into the Phase 2 ponds
without a permit amendment, as these wastes are subject to other Utah Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) disposal regulations. Storage and evaporation of petroleum
E&P wastes is limited to Phase 1 evaporation ponds under the jurisdiction of the Utah
Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining (DOGM).
1. Weekly Leak Detection Monitoring
a. Fluid Measurement - the leak detection sump will be monitored weekly
for the presence of fluids.
b. Sampling if Fluids Present - if fluids are detected in the leak detection
sump, the permittee will either collect samples or measure conductivity
to determine the source of fluid.
F. NON-COMPLIANCE STATUS
1. Probable Out-of-Compliance Status - The permittee shall evaluate results of each
leak detection sampling event to determine any exceedence of the Allowable
Leakage Rate found in Table 1 above. Upon determination that an allowable
leakage rate has been exceeded at any leak detection sump, the permittee shall:
a. Pump fluids from the sump and determine the leakage rate from the
pond.
2. Out-of-Compliance Based Upon Failure To Maintain Best Available Technology
a. Out of Compliance Status shall be defined as follows:
1) Exceeding the allowable leakage rate (ALR) for a consecutive period
of 30 days.
b. Notification and Accelerated Monitoring - In the event that BAT
monitoring indicates a violation of any of the construction or
performance standards outlined in Part I.D of this permit, the permittee
shall submit to the Director both verbal and written notification and
description of the violation in accordance with Part 11.1 of this permit.
1) Increase leak detection monitoring frequency of the non-compliant
pond/sump until the facility is brought into compliance as
determined by the Director.
c. Source Assessment Study Plan - within 30 days after the written notice to
the Director required in Part I.F.2.b above, the permittee shall submit an
assessment study plan and compliance schedule for:
3
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Parti
Permit No. UGW 190002
1) Assessment of the source or cause of the leakage, and determination
of steps necessary to correct the source.
2) Assessment of the extent of any potential dispersion in the
underlying soil.
3) Evaluation of potential remedial actions to restore the pond to
compliance.
G. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. Leak Detection Sump Monitoring - monitoring required in Part I.E.2 above shall
be reported according to the schedule in Table 2 below, unless modified by the
Director:
Table 2: Compliance Monitoring Report Schedule
Quarter Report Due Date
1st (January, February, March) April 30th
2nd (April, May, June) July 31st
3rd (July, August, September) October 31st
4th (October, November, December) January 31st
2. Leak Detection Sump Monitoring- reporting will include:
a. Presence or absence of fluid in the leak detection sumps.
b. Volume of fluid in a leak detection sump, if present.
c. Depth of fluid in a leak detection sump, if present.
c. Results of sampling and analysis of fluid collected for
compliance or leak assessment purposes.
d. The disposition of any fluids in a leak detection sump.
e. The volume of fluid remove from the leak detection sumps.
3. Electronic Filing Requirements - In addition to submittal of the hard copy data,
above, the permittee will electronically submit the required ground water
monitoring data in the electronic format specified by the Director. The data may
be submitted by e-mail, compact disc, or other approved transmittal mechanism.
H. COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
1. Submit a Leak Detection Manual for Phase 2 Ponds that describes the physical
features, operation, monitoring, and maintenance of the ponds and leak detection
system. This manual is due within 90 days after permit issuance.
2. Final Closure Plan. In the event that the permittee decides to discontinue its
operations at the facility the permittee shall notify the Director of such a decision
4
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Part I
Permit No. UGW 190002
3. Duty to Reapply. 180 days prior to permit expiration, an application for the
ground water discharge permit renewal is due. The application notice will include
an updated operational plan describing the proposed operational and closure
activities expected to occur in the next five-year term of the permit.
5
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Part II
Permit No. UGW 190002
PART II
A
B.
C.
D
E.
F.
G
MONITORING, RECORDING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLING
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements established under Part I
shall be representative of the monitored activity.
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Water sample analysis must be conducted according to test procedures specified under
UAC R317-6-6.3.L, unless other test procedures have been specified in this permit.
PENALTIES FOR TAMPERING
The Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders
inaccurate, any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this permit
shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or
by imprisonment for not more than six months per violation, or by both.
REPORTING OF MONITORING RESULTS
Monitoring results obtained during each reporting period specified in the permit, shall be
submitted to the Director, Utah Division of Water Quality at the following address no
later than the 15th day of the month following the completed reporting period:
Attention: Ground Water Protection Section
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 144870
Salt Lake City, Utah 841 14-4870
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES
Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on interim and
final requirements contained in any Compliance Schedule of this permit shall be
submitted no later than 14 days following each schedule date.
ADDITIONAL MONITORING BY THE PERMITTEE
If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit,
using approved test procedures as specified in this permit, the results of this monitoring
shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted. Such increased
frequency shall also be indicated.
RECORDS CONTENTS
Records of monitoring information shall include:
1. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements:
2. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements;
3. The date(s) and time(s) analyses were performed;
4. The individual(s) who performed the analyses;
5. The analytical techniques or methods used; and,
6. The results of such analyses.
RETENTION OF RECORDS
The permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including all calibration
and maintenance records and copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of
all data used to complete the application for this permit, for a period of at least three years
6
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Part II
Permit No. UGW 190002
from the date of the sample, measurement, report or application. This period may be
extended by request of the Director at any time.
I. TWENTY-FOUR HOUR NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE REPORTING
1. The permittee shall verbally report any noncompliance which may endanger
public health or the environment as soon as possible, but no later than 24 hours
from the time the permittee first became aware of the circumstances. The report
shall be made to the Utah Department of Environmental Quality 24 hour number,
(801) 536-4123, or to the Division of Water Quality, Ground Water Protection
Section at (801) 536-4300, during normal business hours (Monday through
Friday 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Mountain Time).
2. A written submission shall also be provided to the Director within five days of
the time that the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written
submission shall contain:
a. A description of the noncompliance and its cause;
b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times;
c. The estimated time noncompliance is expected to continue if it has not
been corrected; and,
d. Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of
the noncompliance.
3. Reports shall be submitted to the addresses in Part II.D, Reporting of Monitoring
Results.
J. OTHER NONCOMPLIANCE REPORTING
Instances of noncompliance not required to be reported within 24 hours, shall be reported
at the time that monitoring reports for Part II.D are submitted.
K. INSPECTION AND ENTRY
The permittee shall allow the Director, or an authorized representative, upon the
presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to:
1. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is
located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of the
permit;
2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept
under the conditions of this permit;
3. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and
control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this
permit; and,
4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit
compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Act, any substances or parameters
at any location.
7
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Part III
Permit No. UGW 190002
PART III COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
A. DUTY TO COMPLY
The permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Act and is grounds for enforcement action;
for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a
permit renewal application. The permittee shall give advance notice to the Director of
any planned changes in the pemiitted facility or activity which may result in
noncompliance with permit requirements.
B. PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF PERMIT CONDITIONS
The Act provides that any person who violates a permit condition implementing
provisions of the Act is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $10,000 per day of such
violation. Any person who willfully or negligently violates permit conditions is subject
to a fine not exceeding $25,000 per day of violation. Any person convicted under
Section 19-5-115(2) of the Act a second time shall be punished by a fine not exceeding
$50,000 per day. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee of the
civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance.
C. NEED TO HALT OR REDUCE ACTIVITY NOT A DEFENSE
It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been
necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the
conditions of this permit.
D. DUTY TO MITIGATE
The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in
violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human
health or the environment.
E. PROPER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of
treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the
permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and
maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and quality assurance procedures.
This provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems
which are installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve
compliance with the conditions of the permit.
8
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Part IV
Permit No. UGW 190002
PART IV GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
A. PLANNED CHANGES
The permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned
physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required when the
alteration or addition could significantly change the nature of the facility or increase the
quantity of pollutants discharged.
B. ANTICIPATED NONCOMPLIANCE
The permittee shall give advance notice of any planned changes in the permitted facility
or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements.
C. PERMIT ACTIONS
This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing
of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or
termination, or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance, does not
stay any permit condition.
D. DUTY TO REAPPLY
If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration
date of this permit, the permittee must apply for and obtain a permit renewal or extension.
The application should be submitted at least 180 days before the expiration date of this
permit.
E. DUTY TO PROVIDE INFORMATION
The permittee shall furnish to the Director, within a reasonable time, any information
which the Director may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying,
revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this
permit. The permittee shall also furnish to the Director, upon request, copies of records
required to be kept by this permit.
F. OTHER INFORMATION
When the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit
application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or any report to the
Director, it shall promptly submit such facts or information.
G. SIGNATORY REQUIREMENTS
All applications, reports or information submitted to the Director shall be signed and
certified.
1. All permit applications shall be signed as follows:
a. For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer;
b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the
proprietor, respectively.
c. For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency: by either a
principal executive officer or ranking elected official.
9
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Part IV
Permit No. UGW 190002
2. All reports required by the permit and other information requested by the
Director shall be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized
representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only
if:
a. The authorization is made in writing by a person described above and
submitted to the Director, and,
b. The authorization specified either an individual or a position having
responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or
activity, such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a
well field, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an
individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental
matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be
either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.)
3. Changes to Authorization. If an authorization under Part IV.G.2 is no longer
accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the
overall operation of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements
of Part IV.G.2 must be submitted to the Director prior to or together with any
reports, information, or applications to be signed by an authorized representative.
4. Certification. Any person signing a document under this section shall make the
following certification:
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the
system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing
violations."
H. PENALTIES FOR FALSIFICATION OF REPORTS
The Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any record or other document submitted or required to
be maintained under this permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or
noncompliance shall, upon conviction be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per
violation, or by imprisonment for not more than six months per violation, or by both.
I. AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS
Except for data determined to be confidential by the permittee, all reports prepared in
accordance with the terms of this permit shall be available for public inspection at the
offices of the Director. As required by the Act, permit applications, permits, effluent
data, and ground water quality data shall not be considered confidential.
J. PROPERTY RIGHTS
The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any
exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion
of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state or local laws or regulations.
10
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Part IV
Permit No. UGW 190002
K. SEVERABILITY
The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the
application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the
application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit,
shall not be affected thereby.
L. TRANSFERS
This permit may be automatically transferred to a new permittee if:
1. The current permittee notifies the Director at least 30 days in advance of the
proposed transfer date;
2. The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittee
containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and
liability between them; and,
3. The Director does not notify the existing permittee and the proposed new
permittee of his or her intent to modify, or revoke and reissue the permit. If this
notice is not received, the transfer is effective on the date specified in the
agreement mentioned in paragraph 2 above.
M. STATE LAWS
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or
relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, penalties established pursuant
to any applicable state law or regulation under authority preserved by Section 19-5-117
of the Act.
N. REOPENER PROVISION
This permit may be reopened and modified (following proper administrative procedures)
to include the appropriate limitations and compliance schedule, if necessary, if one or
more of the following events occurs:
1. If new ground water standards are adopted by the Board, the permit may be
reopened and modified to extend the terms of the permit or to include pollutants
covered by new standards. The permittee may apply for a variance under the
conditions outlined in R317-6-6.4.D.
2. If alternative compliance mechanisms are required.
3. If monitoring data reveal the wastewater quality is different from that authorized
by this permit.
11
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewals
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
19
\
ATTACHMENT F
COST ESTIMATE FOR CLOSURE & POST-CLOSURE
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
6/27/2018 OILFIELD WATER LOGISTICS 1 of 3
SITE NAME: OWL Danish Flats SWD - Evaporation Ponds 1-8 (Phase I Only) Plus Site Infrastructure
SITE ADDRESS: County Road 181, Cisco, UT 84540 (Exit 214)
Unit Quantity Subtotals
12
6,000
2,000
30.2
30.2
1
$ 89,527.01
1
$ 67,187.01
16
2,276,696
$ 3,760.00
12
3,413,424
$ 2,820.00
$ 160,474.02
1,948,800
$ 97,440.00
1,526,400
$ 76,320.00
$ 97,440.00
697
1,500
12
697
697
$ 45,597.87
1
60
$ 3,977.00
Item A.2.3 Subtotal Phase II: UDEQ-DWQ
Remove Tanks and Treatment Equipment ls $ 31,592.00 $ 31,592.00 2018 quote from BCR. Includes transport,
cleaning and disposal fees for 12 tanks.
Phase I for Bonding
$ 1,268.54
If Contaminated - Dispose of soil in approx. 9,408-ft2 pad @ 2 feet cy $ 46.07
$ 32,110.79
2018 Cubic yard cost for disposal at ECDC,
Carbon County, UT
Phase I Total
Mobilization ls $ 625.00 $ 625.00 Mob from Grand Junction.
4. Monitoring Wells
A.4.1 - Closure of Monitoring Wells
Close 2 wells ft $ 7.85 $ 3,352.00 Existing wells.
A.3.1 - Receiving & Treatment Tanks - 4 x Receiving Tanks (1,000-bbl), 1 x Flow Splitter (500-bbl), 2 x Gun Barrel Tanks (500-bbl), 1 x Slop Tank (400-bbl), 4 x Oil Tanks (400- bbl)
Soil removal
Restore area by tanks (est. 2 feet thick)cy $ 1.82 $ 1,268.54 Grading & Backfill.
3. Tanks and Piping
Remove / place piping and blocks within pond bottom lf $ 5.50 $ 8,250.00 Estimated for manifold piping.
A.3.2 - Piping
Test soil sam $ 225.00 $ 2,700.00 Lab and collection cost.
A.3.3 - Soil Under Tanks
If Contaminated - Remove soil in approx. 9,408-ft2 pad @ 2 feet cy $ 1.82
Phase I for Bonding
Phase I Total
Lab and collection cost estimate.
Natural evaporation for 5 years.
Item A.1.5 Subtotal Phase II: UDEQ-DWQ
Item A.2.2 Subtotal Phase I for Bonding
A.2.1 - Settlement Pond x One (1) (Reclaimed)
A.2.2 - Evaporation Ponds x Eight (8) (Phase I: Ponds 1-8 - 600 x 400 x 10)
Reclaimed on March 29, 2017.
Cut and fold 60ml geomembrane liner in ponds sf $ 0.05
Phase I Total
2. Geomembrane Liner
A.1.5 - Evaporation Ponds x Six (6) (Phase II: Ponds 9-14 - 600 x 400 x 20)
Test sediment $ 235.00 $ 2,820.00
Evaporate water at 100% (working level of 18')bbl $ - $ -
If Contaminated - Dispose of Sediment cy $ 46.07 $ 1,389.01
Item A.1.4 Subtotal
2018 Cubic yard cost for disposal at ECDC,
Carbon County, UT
Evaporate water at 100% (working level of 8')bbl $ - $ - Natural evaporation for 5 years.
Phase I for Bonding
A.1.3 - Settlement Pond x One (1) (Reclaimed)
Reclaimed on March 29, 2017.
Test sediment sam $ 235.00 $ 3,760.00 Lab and collection cost estimate.
A.1.4 - Evaporation Ponds x Eight (8) (Phase I: Ponds 1-8 - 600 x 400 x 10)
Item A.1.1 Subtotal
bbl $ 25.00 $ 50,000.00 From Integrated Water Management and
assumes no sale value.
If Contaminated - Remove sediment (est. 6" thick)cy $ 40.00 $ 1,206.00 Remove and pump sediment from tanks.
Cost Estimate for Closure & Post-Closure
Version: 06/27/2018
Item Unit Unit Cost Item Cost Notes
A. DEWATERING AND REMOVING OF STRUCTURES
1. Remove Water and Sediment (stabilize in place, if not contaminated)
Test sediment sam $ 235.00 $ 2,820.00 Lab cost plus 1/2 hour.
Transfer water to ponds for evaporation bbl
Phase I Item A.1 Subtotal
$ 0.42 $ 2,520.00 Pump from tanks to ponds.
A.1.1 - Receiving & Treatment Tanks - 4 x Receiving Tanks (1,000-bbl), 1 x Flow Splitter (500-bbl), 2 x Gun Barrel Tanks (500-bbl), 1 x Slop Tank (400-bbl), 4 x Oil Tanks (400- bbl)
Transport and Dispose of Slop Oil and Condensate
Phase I Item A.2 Subtotal
Phase I Item A.3 Subtotal
Phase I Item A.4. Subtotal
A.1.2 - Site Office
Office demolishing. Tear down of all tin, metai, interior, concrete, and the capping of all
utility lines. Includes trucking and disposal of all debris.
ls $ 33,000.00 $ 33,000.00 Quote from Two in the Loop, Grand
Junction, CO.
Item A.1.2 Subtotal Phase I for Bonding
A.2.3 - Evaporation Ponds x Six (6) (Phase II: Ponds 9-14 - 600 x 400 x 20)
Cut and fold 60ml geomembrane liner in ponds sf $ 0.05 $ 76,320.00 Labor for cutting and folding liner in- place.
$ 97,440.00 Labor for cutting and folding liner in- place.
sam
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
6/27/2018 OILFIELD WATER LOGISTICS 2 of 3
SITE NAME: OWL Danish Flats SWD - Evaporation Ponds 1-8 (Phase I Only) Plus Site Infrastructure
SITE ADDRESS: County Road 181, Cisco, UT 84540 (Exit 214)
Unit Quantity Subtotals
Cost Estimate for Closure & Post-Closure
Version: 06/27/2018
Item Unit Unit Cost Item Cost Notes
$ 307,488.89
1
625,784
6,751,800
$ 1,449,628.88
1
821,334
6,316,200
$ 1,788,105.88
$ 1,449,628.88
155.0
$ 275,974.40
145.0
$ 258,169.60
$ 275,974.40
$ 1,725,603.28
0
$ -
A to C CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL $ 2,033,092.17
5
40
1
$ 26,000.00
4
40
1
$ 23,500.00
$ 26,000.00
$ 26,000.00
$ 2,059,092.17
$ 2,265,001.39
day $ 2,500.00 $ 10,000.00 Estimated.
* Surveying (as-built final)hrs $ 200.00 $ 8,000.00 Estimated.
Seeding, topsoil and hydro-mulch ac $ 1,780.48
Item B.2.2 Subtotal Phase II: UDEQ-DWQ
Phase I Bonding
Item B.1.2 Subtotal Phase II: UDEQ-DWQ
$ 258,169.60
2. Re-Vegetation: Includes Tank Battery, Office, Ponds, Road & Berms
Seeding, topsoil and hydro-mulch ac $ 1,780.48
Item B.2.1 Subtotal Phase I for Bonding
B.2.2 - Phase II: Re-Vegetation (seeding & topsoil) - Pond Area & Road/Berms
$ 275,974.40 RS Means & Bids.
B.2.1 - Phase 1: Re-Vegetation (seeding & topsoil) - Pond Area & Road/Berms
cy $ 1.82 $ 1,494,827.88 RS Means & Bids.
Final Grading and Surface sf $ 0.04 $ 252,648.00 RS Means & Bids.
Final Grading and Surface sf $ 0.04 $ 270,072.00 RS Means & Bids.
A. REMOVAL/DISPOSAL SUBTOTAL
B.1.1 - Phase I: Includes tank area, off loading system, 8 ponds with dikes and road.
Phase I for Bonding
CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE TOTAL (A - E)
A - E COST
D. ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT SUBTOTAL
E. CLOSURE COST CONTINGENCIES
* CONTINGENCY (10%)
$ 205,909.22 10%
* Surveying (as-built final)hrs $ 200.00 $ 8,000.00 Estimated.
Phase I Bonding
* Cert. Report Closure (letter)LS $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 Estimated.
Item D.1.1 Subtotal Phase I for Bonding
D.1.2 - Phase II - Engineering
* Construction Inspection/Oversight (not full time)
* Cert. Report Closure (letter)LS $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 Estimated.
Item D.1.2 Subtotal Phase II for Bonding
D. ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
* Construction Inspection/Oversight (not full time)day $ 2,500.00 $ 12,500.00 Estimated.
1. Engineering
D.1.1 - Phase I - Engineering
C. MISCELLANEOUS
1. Miscellaneous Inventory
C.1.1 - Miscellaneous
A - C COST (PHASE I ONLY)
Miscellaneous $ - $ -
C. MISCELLANEOUS SUBTOTAL
Phase I
RS Means & Bids.
B. RESTORATION SUBTOTAL
Mobilization ls $ 40,630.00 $ 40,630.00 RS Means.
Excavate and place soil on-site cy $ 1.82 $ 1,138,926.88 RS Means & Bids.
Item B.1.1 Subtotal Phase I for Bonding
B.1.2 - Phase II: Includes 6 ponds with dikes
Mobilization ls $ 40,630.00 $ 40,630.00 RS Means.
Excavate and place soil on-site
B. RESTORATION
1. Place Fill & Grade
Phase I Item B.1 Subtotal
Phase I Item B.2 Subtotal
Phase I Item D.1 Subtotal
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
6/27/2018 OILFIELD WATER LOGISTICS 3 of 3
SITE NAME: OWL Danish Flats SWD - Evaporation Ponds 1-8 (Phase I Only) Plus Site Infrastructure
SITE ADDRESS: County Road 181, Cisco, UT 84540 (Exit 214)
Unit Quantity Subtotals
Cost Estimate for Closure & Post-Closure
Version: 06/27/2018
Item Unit Unit Cost Item Cost Notes
10 $ 248,764.55
$ 2,513,765.94
COSTS ARE IN 2018 DOLLARS:As of June 27, 2018
PRIOR APPROVED AMOUNT:
PHASE I BONDING
INCREASE & RIDER AMOUNT:
DECREASE & RIDER AMOUNT:
SITE NAME: OWL Danish Flats SWD
SITE ADDRESS: County Road 181, Cisco, UT 84540 (Exit 214)
REVISED: Revised 06/27/2018
2
16
110
1
2
2
2
3
8
3
2
$ 3,631.70
9
$ 18,000.00
$ 21,631.70
$ 3,244.76
$ 24,876.46 TOTAL ESTIMATED ITEM F. TOTAL
Principal Engineer
Project Manager
Project Professional II
Draftsman
Clerical
2,513,765.94$
ITEM F. SUBTOTAL
15% CONTINGENCY
Hour
Hour
Hour
Hour
Item Subtotal
Acre
$ 351.00
$ 840.00
$ 225.00
$ 104.00
$ 117.00
$ 105.00
$ 75.00
$ 52.00
Item Subtotal
$ 18,000.00
2 monitoring wells, annual. F.1.1 - Groundwater Sampling & Site Review
Includes mob/demob
Method 8015 TPH-D, TPH-G, chlorides,
total dissolved solids (TDS), and sulfates.
Project Manager
Sampling Technician
Mileage
Per Diem
Sampling Supplies
Groundwater Analyses
Mile
Day
$ 149.50
$ 234.00
$ 1,024.00
Each
Each
$ 117.00
$ 64.00
$ 0.57
F.1.2 - Annual Report
Hour
Hour
$ 12.00
$ 2,000.00
F.1.3 - POST-CLOSURE MAINTENANCE
Repair Erosion and Vegetation
Assumes 3% of total area of 300 acres per year
$ 62.70
$ 160.00
$ 24.00
$ 299.00
$ 160.00
$ 154.00 Hour $ 308.00
Phase I A - F COST
F. POST-CLOSURE MONITORING & MAINTENANCE
1. Monitoring & Reporting
2,633,560.00$
119,794.06$
CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE TOTAL (A - F)
YR $ 24,876.46 $ 248,764.55 5 YEARS PLUS 5 YEARS FOR 2 WELLS
F. POST-CLOSURE MONITORING & MAINTENANCE
Maintenance
COSTS IN 2018 USD
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewals
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
20
ATTACHMENT G
NRCS SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Natural Resources Conservation Service
125 South State St., Room 4010, Salt Lake City, UT 84138
Voice 801 524-4550 Fax 801 524 4403
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer
May 9, 2016
Seth Peters
Safety Manager
OWL SWD Operating, LLC
Johnstown, Regional Office
PO Box 670
Windsor, CO 80550
(970)775-8100
Mr. Peters,
The seeding specification for the OWL Danish Flats SWD Sludge Pond Closure Plan is attached.
Also attached are two supporting documents, the soil report and the ecological site description.
From our phone conversation, I understand that soil from onsite will be used to cap an area of
approximately 10 acres to a depth of 2 feet: one foot of compacted clay and one foot of topsoil,
stockpiled from previous excavations at the site.
The soil (Mack Loam) contains the following layers:
A1 - 0 to 3 inches: loam
B2t - 3 to 11 inches: clay loam
B3tca - 11 to 16 inches: silt loam
C1ca,C2 - 16 to 33 inches: fine sandy loam
C3 - 33 to 60 inches: silt loam
Presumably, the topsoil (consisting of loam and clay loam) was stockpiled separately, and the
lower one foot of the cap will be a mixture of the remaining lower layers. It is questionable
whether there will be sufficient clay content to create an impermeable compacted layer from this
material. Leaving the material uncompacted will aid in plant persistence and growth.
The species recommended in the seeding specification were chosen from a list of plants that are
able to grow in 5-8 inches of precipitation, with a soil pH range of 7.9-8.4, are readily available
on the commercial market, are useful for alleviating erosion by wind or water, and have a high to
moderate seedling vigor. The ecological site description (Desert Loam (shadscale)) was used to
further select plants that are native and suited for this specific location. In addition, the
nonnative plants Siberian wheatgrass and forage kochia were added to the list for their ability to
establish and grow in the severe climate conditions at the site. Specific recommendations for
seeding these species are on the specification sheet.
In addition to the seeding, I am offering the following alternatives for you to consider to improve
the odds of plant establishment and persistence on the challenging site.
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Natural Resources Conservation Service
125 South State St., Room 4010, Salt Lake City, UT 84138
Voice 801 524-4550 Fax 801 524 4403
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer
• Straw mulch, crimped into the soil with a disc or coulter (not offset), to provide shade
and wind protection to the seedlings. The straws crimped into the soil will help any
precipitation that falls infiltrate the soil, and will also help prevent wind erosion during
establishment. This would be applied following the seeding.
• Continuity modifiers placed at intervals across the site would help create micro
environments conducive to seedling establishment, and prevent wind erosion. These can
be thought of as small windbreaks. They could be made from many different materials
such as straw bales or hardware cloth, and their spacing would typically be 6 to 10 times
their height.
• Temporary sprinkler irrigation to ensure seeds will germinate and establish could be
applied. There are companies that rent irrigation equipment. A water source at the site
would be a necessary requirement if this alternative is chosen. Once the plants advance
their growth beyond the critical seedling stage with root systems that reach deep into the
soil, the species recommended will be able to persist without irrigation after one or two
growing seasons.
• Containerized 4-wing saltbush plants are available from conservation nurseries. Planting
seedlings directly, with the aid of water supplying aids such as DriWater, may increase
the establishment of this shrub that will ultimately be important for protecting the site
from wind erosion. Spacing of the plants would be on a grid with about 25 feet between
plants.
I hope you find this recommendation useful.
Shane Green
NRCS Utah State Rangeland Specialist
435-901-1124
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Name: Date:
MLRA
Purpose(s):
Total PLS
Date:
Depth:
D34 Ecological Site: Desert Loam (Shadscale)
If Yes, Who with & When:
VavilovII
10
Tract:Field:Slope: 0-4%Elevation:4625
Location: Mack Loam Acres:
Planned by:S. Green Erosion Potential: High
Wildlife:
Stabilize areas with existing or expected high rates of soil erosion Livestock:
Grazing should be in accordance with Prescribed Grazing (528) specifications. Weeds, insects, and/or diseases should be
controlled through mowing, burning, flash grazing, or pesticides as needed to maintain a healthy stand. Where stands are
damaged by drought, insects, or other uncontrollable events, the stand should be replanted, overseeded, or spot planted. Thin
stands may only need grazing deferment during the growing season rather than replanting.
Monitor seedling establishment for 3 years. Re-seed after 2 years in the case of a failure.
Equipment: Rangeland Drill
Notes: The recommendations
shown above are for most of the
seeds in the mix. The Indian
ricegrass should be planted in a
separate operation to a 2 inch
depth. The Forage Kochia
should be planted seperately via
broadcast followed by a drag.
106Lbs of No.1 rice hulls needd to make 2 bushel per acre volume 10.57
Operation and Maintenance of Seeding After Establishment
20
4
Management During Plant Establishment
191
1.95
0.39
5.85 59
*Total Rate to be Seeded:19.11
Kochia, Forage
Critical Area Planting (342)
SPECIFICATION SHEET
Oilfield Water Logisitcs c/o Seth Peters May 9, 2016 Precip: 8-May
7.80
2
78
29
0.20
Sec 8, T20s R24e near Cisco Soil(s):
Method: Drill
Wheatgrass, Siberian
Immigrant
A sludge pit will be capped with one foot of subsoil and one foot of topsoil stockpiled from previous
excavations on site. Implements such as a cultipacker will be used to create a firm seedbed (a footprint
should sink in less than 1/2 inch)
Seed (lbs)Species VarietyOct 15 - Feb 25
Winterfat
Saltbush, Fourwing
Seedbed Preparation:
Planting Information
Squirreltail, bottlebrush0-1/8 inch
DWR Consultation:
12 inchesSpacing:
Ricegrass, Indian
2.93
PLS Rate
(lbs/ac)
USDA - NRCS - UTAH May 2016
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewals
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
21
ATTACHMENT H
SECTION R649-9-13 VARIANCE REQUEST – TRANSFER OF PHASE II
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
&ŽƌŝǀŝƐŝŽŶhƐĞKŶůLJ
Compliance Review Completed:
No outstanding compliance
Active violation/compliance matter
Signature:
Comments
&ŝǀĞzĞĂƌΘWtĂƐƚĞDisposal Facility Wermit Renewal Checkůisƚ
WĞƌŵŝƚZĞŶĞǁĂůƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ^ƵďŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ
^ƵďŵŝƚĂŶĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŽĨƐŝƚĞƌĞĐůĂŵĂƚŝŽŶƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĨƌŽŵĂĐĞƌƚŝĨŝĞĚ
ƚŚŝƌĚƉĂƌƚLJĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌZϲϰϵͲϵͲϴ͘Ϯ
^ƵďŵŝƚĐůŽƐƵƌĞĐŽƐƚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐĨƌŽŵĂĐĞƌƚŝĨŝĞĚƚŚŝƌĚƉĂƌƚLJĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌ
ZϲϰϵͲϵͲϴ͘Ϯ
WƌŽǀŝĚĞďŽŶĚĂŵŽƵŶƚĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚďLJƚŚĞŝǀŝƐŝŽŶZϲϰϵͲϵͲϴ
ĞƚĂŝůĞĚ^ŝƚĞĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ
&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞǁĂƐƚĞĚŝƐƉŽƐĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJ
ƵƌƌĞŶƚĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJŵĂƉ
^ŝƚĞĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶƐĂŶŶŽƚĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶ
ŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ
ĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚƐĂŵƉůĞƌĞƐƵůƚƐ
WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŵŽŶŝƚŽƌŝŶŐͬƌĞŵĞĚŝĂƚŝŽŶ
WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĞƐƚŽƉƌĞǀĞŶƚĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ
ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ
ĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŽĨĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƚƚŚĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJ
ĞƐĐƌŝďĞŝŶĚĞƚĂŝůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞůŝĨĞĨŽƌĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƵƐĞĚŝŶĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƚĞƐƚŝŶŐ
ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĨŽƌĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ;ƚĂŶŬƐ͕ƉŝƉŝŶŐ͕ůŝŶĞƌƐ͕ůĞĂŬĚĞƚĞĐƚŝŽŶĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ĞǀĂƉŽƌĂƚŝŽŶĨĂŶƐͿ
WƌĂĐƚŝĐĞƐƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ
ƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŽĨŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĞƐƵƚŝůŝnjĞĚƚŽŽƉĞƌĂƚĞƚŚĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJ/ĚĞŶƚŝĨLJĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞ
ƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĞƐǁŚŝĐŚĐŽƵůĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐŽƌƌĞĚƵĐĞƉƌŽďĂďŝůŝƚLJŽĨĨƵƚƵƌĞĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ
Name of &ĂĐŝůŝƚLJOperator:
Name of &ĂĐŝůŝƚLJ͗
>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗
ĂƚĞ͗
WƌĞƉĂƌĞƌ͗
ĂƚĞ /ŶŝƚŝĂůƐ ĂƚĞ/ŶŝƚŝĂůƐ
ZĞĐĞŝǀĞĚ ZĞǀŝĞǁĞĚ
ZĞǀŝĞǁŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ͗ƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ^ƚĂƚƵƐ͗ WWZKs
&ŽƌŝǀŝƐŝŽŶhƐĞKŶůLJĞůŽǁdŚŝƐ>ŝŶĞ
OWL SWD Operating, LLC dba Oilfield Water Logistics
OWL Danish Flats SWD
County Road 181, Cisco, UT 84540 (Exit 214). T. 20 S, R. 24 E, Sec 8
06/27/18
CASE Associates, LLC
✔
Bart Kettle Digitally signed by Bart Kettle
Date: 2018.12.28 17:43:24 -07'00'
06/28/18 BTK 12/28/18 BTK
06/28/18 BTK 12/28/18 BTK
06/28/18 BW 04/02/19 BW $ 2,200,000
Phase I DOGM. Phase II DEQ per permit renewal info-
BTK 04/02/2019
DOGM Received renewed full cost bond amount of
$2,633,560.BW
Dayne Doucet Digitally signed by Dayne Doucet
DN: cn=Dayne Doucet, o=DNR, ou=DOGM,
email=daynedoucet@utah.gov, c=US
Date: 2019.04.15 08:58:54 -06'00'✔
12/28/18 BTK Description of process included. Engineer drawing
provided.
12/28/18 BTK Reference barrier of Mancos shale, no ground water.
Remediation of sludge pond
12/28/18 BTK
Monthly Inspections. Service life 15-30 years for
equipment and liners
12/28/18 BTK Automated system recently installed.
Sundry Number: 95372
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
/ŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞZĞŵŽǀĂůŽƐƚƐ
Contouring or RegradingŽƐƚƐ
SeediŶŐŽƐƚƐ
Notes:
ŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶŽƐƚƐ
ƐƚŝŵĂƚŝŶŐůŽƐƵƌĞŽƐƚĂŶĚŽŶĚŝŶŐǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶ
ZĞŵŽǀĂůͬZĞŵĞĚŝĂƚŝŽŶ
^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ
WŽƐƚĐůŽƐƵƌĞŵŽŶŝƚŽƌŝŶŐ
džƉĞŶƐĞƐƚŽƌĞŵŽǀĞĂůůŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ
WƌŽũĞĐƚĞdžƉĞŶƐĞƚŽĐŽŶƚŽƵƌƐŝƚĞďĂĐŬƚŽŽƌŝŐŝŶĂůŐƌĂĚĞ
sŽůƵŵĞƐŽĨŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů
ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚĐŽƐƚƐ
>ĂďŽƌĐŽƐƚƐ
DĞƚŚŽĚŽĨƌĞƐĞĞĚŝŶŐ
^ƉĞĐŝĞƐƵƐĞĚĨŽƌƌĞǀĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶ
ĂƚĞ/ŶŝƚŝĂůƐ
ZĞĐĞŝǀĞĚ
Comments
DŽŶŝƚŽƌŝŶŐWƌŽŐƌĂŵ
ĞƚĂŝůĞĚĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨŵŽŶŝƚŽƌŝŶŐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐŝŶƵƐĞŽƌďĞŝŶŐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ;ǀŝƐƵĂůŝŶƐƉĞĐƚŝŽŶƐŽĨ
ĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞƚĞƐƚƐ͕ůĞĂŬĚĞƚĞĐƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵƐ͕ǁĂƐƚĞĂĐĐŽƵŶƚĂďŝůŝƚLJ͕ĂƵƚŽŵĂƚĞĚƐLJƐƚĞŵƐ͕
ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĞƐǁŚŝĐŚĐĂŶƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞƌŝƐŬŽĨĨƵƚƵƌĞĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶͿ
12/28/18 BTK
Weekly leak detection monitoring. Weekly liner
monitoring. Monthly tank monitoring. Reclamation area
monitored quarterly. Quarterly ground water monitoring
04/02/19 BW
04/02/19 BW
04/02/19 BW
04/02/19 BW
04/02/2019 Phase I Ponds #1-8 DOGM administration/bonding. Phase II Ponds #9-14 UWDQ administration. Supporting info:
Attachment F. Bond Estimate-Operator is choosing UDWQ administration for Phase II Ponds #9-14
Attachment H-Operator submitted Variance Request to transfer Phase II Ponds #9-14 UWDQ
Attachment E-An e-mail Correspondence with UDWQ Dan Hall
Attachment D UDWQ Ground Water Discharge Permit 10/9/2014
UDWQ Letter- Conversion Evaporation Pond use Utah Division of Water Quality oversight 07/1/2014
Bond for Phase I is set at $2,200,000.00. The operator has submitted full cost bonding for the facility at $2,633,560. BW
COA's
-Visual inspection of Equipment, tanks and liners on a monthly basis. Quarterly ground water monitoring conducted for at monitoring wells.
-Phase I Ponds #1-8 are permitted to accept RCRA E&P exempt fluids.
Sundry Number: 95372
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
10
F. ESTIMATING CLOSURE COSTS & BONDING EVALUATION
1. Permitting & Current Bonding
Presently the facility is bonded through DOGM. A unique situation exists where the Phase II
ponds, numbers nine (9) to fourteen (14), are dual permitted to potentially accept two different
waste streams. Under the DOGM permit the ponds are approved to receive E&P produced
water. But Phase II also operates under the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division
of Water Quality (UDWQ), Groundwater Discharge Permit, UGW190002, permitted to receive
non-hazardous low and high salinity fluids (Attachment E). A condition of the UDWQ permit is
that the storage and evaporation of petroleum E&P wastes is limited to Phase I evaporation
ponds under the jurisdiction of DOGM. The facility has complied with this condition since
issuance of the UDWQ permit on October 09, 2014.
DOGM have requested that the 2018 permit renewal process eliminate the situation where the
Phase II ponds are dual permitted. OWL have determined its preference to move forward and
remove the Phase II ponds from DOGM bonding. Advice was obtained from UDWQ Manager,
Dan Hall P.G., who advised via email the Utah DEQ/DWQ does not have bonding authority.
Further the position of the UDWQ is that this part of the facility, referencing Phase II, does not
allow for the acceptance of oil and gas waste and therefore does not fall under the DOGM’s
jurisdiction (Attachment F). This application will therefore endeavor to outline a bonding scope
for the facility excluding Phase II which will default to the UDWQ authority. A variance request,
under R649-9-13, has been submitted with the application to formalize the modification
(Attachment H).
The facility has been constructed in phases since 2007. Oilfield Water Logistics assumed all
liabilities regarding the bonds commencing October 20, 2014. A breakdown of the current
bonding status, where DOGM have been named as the ‘Obligee,’ is outlined below:
Table 1.3 Current Bonding Synopsis
POND # DATE BONDED BOND # AMOUNT
Separation Pond &
Concrete Vaults Reclaimed March 29, 2017
Pond One (1) 12/13/2012 SUR0020547 $170,000.00
Pond Two (2) 12/13/2012 SUR0020546 $170,000.00
Pond Three (3) 12/13/2012 SUR0020545 $149,130.00
Pond Four (4) 12/13/2012 SUR0020544 $149,130.00
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
Five Year E&P Waste Disposal Facility Permit Renewal
OWL Danish Flats SWD Oilfield Water Logistics
11
2. Bonding for the Permit Renewal Process
As previously outlined OWL Danish Flats SWD is located in section 8. When breaking the section
to a quarter-quarter section and overlaying it to an aerial view of the facility a conservative
calculation assumes that approximately 300 of the 640 acres has been disturbed (Appendix A –
Figure 6). Relevant to this permit renewal application is the soil disturbance to Phase I. The
bonded acreage includes the Phase I ponds, the tank battery, site office and offloading bays,
soil stockpiles, internal facility roads, storm water channels, containment walls, the perimeter
fence and the previously reclaimed separation pond. In total the soil disturbance to Phase I is
approximately 155 acres.
Bonding estimates have been calculated through reliance on RS Means as well as current
proposals from contractors. The ‘Notes’ section of the ‘Cost Estimate for Closure & Post-Closure
(Attachment H) provides a comment which outlines the source referenced to arrive at the
bonding estimate for that particular line item. The line item estimates include labor and
equipment unless otherwise stated.
In respect to contamination. The bonding estimate has considered soil samples in two (2)
separate locations at the base of each pond to assess for potential contamination. Those soil
samples will be analyzed for TEPH, TVPH, EC, SAR and ESP.
Pond Five (5) 12/13/2012 SUR0020543 $149,130.00
Pond Six (6) 11/06/2012 SUR0020536 $149,130.00
Pond Seven (7) 11/06/2012 SUR0020536 $149,130.00
Pond Eight (8) 11/06/2012 SUR0020536 $149,130.00
Pond Nine (9) 11/06/2012 SUR0020535 $233,130.00
Pond Ten (10) 11/06/2012 SUR0020534 $233,130.00
Pond Eleven (11) 11/06/2012 SUR0020533 $233,130.00
Pond Twelve (12) 12/13/2012 SUR0020548 $233,130.00
Pond Thirteen (13) 12/13/2012 SUR0020549 $233,130.00
Pond Fourteen (14) 11/06/2012 SUR0020550 $233,130.00
TOTAL $2,633,560.00
Sundry Number: 95372 File: Detailed Site Description
RECEIVED: Apr. 15, 2019
1594 West North Temple, Suite 1210 • PO Box 145801 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5801 • Telephone (801) 538-5340 • www.ogm.utah.gov
State of Utah
SPENCER J. COX
Governor
DEIDRE M. HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor
October 12, 2023
via email: eliteprotectivecoatings@gmail.com
Jon Goza
Danish Flats Waste Disposal, LLC
881 Baxter Drive
South Jordan, UT 84095
SUBJECT: Danish Flats Waste Disposal, LLC Recognition as Operator of the Danish Flats
Surface Facility
Dear Mr. Goza,
On September 11, 2023, the Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining (Division) transferred the Danish
Flats surface facility from OWL SWD Operating, LLC to Danish Flats Waste Disposal, LLC.
Danish Flats Waste Disposal, LLC has provided a full-cost bond to the Division for the Danish
Flats surface facility; therefore, effective September 11, 2023, Danish Flats Waste Disposal, LLC
may operate the facility as permitted.
If you have any questions, please contact Rachel Medina at (385) 249-0126 or
rachelmedina@utah.gov.
Sincerely,
Rachel Medina
Bonding Technician
Department of Natural Resources
Division of Oil, Gas and Mining
JOEL FERRY
Executive Director
JOHN R. BAZA
Division Director