Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDERR-2025-000672SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT NOVEMBER 2024 EVENT Pilot Travel Center #294 1670 W 12th Street Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Weber County, Utah UDEQ-DERR Facility ID #1200515, LUST Release ID: MZR Prepared for: Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Environmental Response and Remediation 195 North 1950 West P.O. Box 144840 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4840 Prepared by: Broadbent & Associates, Inc. 186 E. Main St, Suite #99 Sandy, Utah 84070 (801)505-9251 January 21, 2025 Project No. 19-14-107 SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT NOVEMBER 2024 EVENT PILOT TRAVEL CENTER #294 OGDEN (MARRIOTT-SLATERVILLE), WEBER COUNTY, UTAH Broadbent & Associates, Inc. (Broadbent) is pleased to present this Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report, November 2024 Event on behalf of Pilot Travel Centers LLC (Pilot) associated with Pilot Travel Center #294 (Site) located in Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Utah. Figure 1 depicts the general location of the Site. Figure 2 depicts the general area of investigation associated with the Site. Groundwater monitoring and sampling was performed to assist with evaluation of Site conditions associated with a release of fuel from the underground storage tank (UST) system. Fuel was released due to a rupture in the flex line of the STP sump for UST #5 (the southern-most 20,000- gallon capacity diesel UST, located in the center of the UST basin). Details of work performed, discussion of results, and recommendations are provided below. Field work and sampling activities were performed by Sarah Hamilton (GS #1869). Facility Name / Address: Pilot Travel Center #294, 1670 W 12th Street, Ogden (Marriott- Slaterville), Weber County, Utah Pilot Project Manager / Title: Mr. Joey Cupp – Sr. Director, Environmental, (865) 588-7488 Broadbent Contact: Mr. Aric Morton, (801) 505-9251 Broadbent Project No.: 19-14-107 Primary Regulatory Agency / ID No.: Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) DERR Facility ID #1200515, LUST Release ID: MZR Current phase of project: Monitoring and evaluation of Site conditions List of Acronyms / Abbreviations: See end of report text for list of acronyms/abbreviations used in report. WORK PERFORMED THIS PERIOD (July-December 2024): 1. Conducted groundwater monitoring and sampling on November 14, 2024. WORK SCHEDULED FOR NEXT PERIOD (January-June 2025): 1. Prepare and submit the Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report, November 2024 Event (herein). 2. Conduct semi-annual groundwater monitoring and sampling event in June 2025. SEMI-ANNUAL MONITORING PLAN SUMMARY: Groundwater level gauging: MW-2 through MW-9, MW-13 & MW-14; (semi-annual) MW-10 and MW-12 (biennial) Groundwater sample collection: MW-2 through MW-9, MW-13 & MW-14 (semi-annual) MW-10 and MW-12 (biennial) Broadbent & Associates, Inc. Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report Salt Lake City, Utah Pilot Travel Center #294/Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Utah January 21, 2025 Page 2 SEMI-ANNUAL RESULTS SUMMARY: ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED & RESULTS: Semi-annual groundwater monitoring and sampling activities were conducted on November 14, 2024 by Sarah Hamilton, certified sampler GS-1869. Wells MW-1 through MW-8, MW-11, MW-12, and MW-14 were monitored for depth to water and depth to LNAPL, if present. No LNAPL was observed during this sampling. The monitoring schedule for gauging and sampling is summarized in Table 1. Wells MW-9 and MW-13 were not located. Well MW- 1 was used as a substitute for MW-9 as it was the closest monitoring well. The well cap for MW-10 could not be removed and no gauging occurred. MW-11 (no longer apart of sampling plan) and MW-12 (only to be sampled biennial) were inadvertently gauged. No other irregularities were reported during gauging. Measured depths to groundwater ranged from 5.55 feet in well MW-5 to 7.90 feet in well MW-1. Water level elevations yielded a horizontal groundwater gradient with a general direction to the north-northwest at an approximate magnitude of 0.001 feet/foot. Groundwater elevations decreased approximately 2.11 feet across the Site since the previous monitoring event. Broadbent’s groundwater monitoring and sampling field procedures are provided in Appendix A. Groundwater monitoring field data sheets are provided in Appendix B. Current and historical measured depths to groundwater and respective groundwater elevations are summarized in Table 2. Figure 1 depicts the general location of the Site. Figure 2 depicts the general area of investigation associated with the Site. A groundwater potentiometric surface map is attached as Figure 3. Groundwater samples were collected from Wells MW-1 through MW-8, MW-11, MW-12, and MW-14 were sampled. The monitoring schedule for gauging and sampling is summarized in Table 1. Wells MW-9 and MW-13 were not located. Well MW-1 was used as a substitute for MW-9 as it was the closest monitoring well. The well cap for MW-10 could not be removed and no sampling occurred. MW-11 (no longer apart of sampling plan) and MW-12 (only to be sampled biennial) were inadvertently sampled. No other irregularities were reported during purging or sampling. Samples were submitted on ice, under chain-of-custody protocol, to Pace Analytical for analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) diesel range organics (DRO) with silica gel treatment by EPA Method 3511/8015. The laboratory extracted and analyzed the samples within the recommended hold times. A groundwater analytical map is attached as Figure 4. Laboratory analytical results are summarized in Table 1. The laboratory report and chain-of-custody documentation are attached as Appendix C. Analytical results yield the following notable observations: • TPH-DRO was detected in six (6) of the 11 collected groundwater samples at concentrations ranging from 112 µg/L (MW-5) to 3,660 µg/L (MW-3). LNAPL LNAPL observed this quarter: No (yes/no) LNAPL recovered this quarter: 0.0 (gal) Cumulative LNAPL recovered: 0.0 (gal) Groundwater Elevation and Gradient: Depth to groundwater: 5.55 (MW-5) to 7.90 (MW-1) (ft below TOC) Gradient direction: North-Northwest (compass direction) Gradient magnitude: 0.001 (ft/ft) Average change in elevation: -2.11 (ft since last measurement) Laboratory Analytical Data Summary: TPH-DRO was detected in six (6) of 11 groundwater monitoring wells sampled during the November 2024 event. MW-3 (3,660 µg/L) and MW-6 (1,220 µg/L) concentrations were detected above UDEQ Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) of 1,000 µg/L. Broadbent & Associates, Inc. Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report Salt Lake City, Utah Pilot Travel Center #294/Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Utah January 21, 2025 Page 3 • Samples from MW-3 (3,660 µg/L) and MW-6 (1,220 µg/L) exhibited residual TPH-DRO concentrations exceeding the UDEQ ISL of 1,000 µg/L during this sampling event. DISCUSSION: The Semi-Annual 2024 groundwater monitoring event was conducted on November 14, 2024. Site associated groundwater monitoring wells were sampled in accordance with the Corrective Action Plan Amendment Approval dated February 4, 2020. Depth to water gauging in Site wells resulted in a general groundwater gradient direction to the north-northwest at an average magnitude of 0.001 ft/ft. LNAPL was not observed during this monitoring event. Residual concentrations have fluctuated since the previous monitoring event, including decreases from 1,260 µg/L to 602 µg/L in MW-8 and from 1,640 µg/L to 1,220 µg/L in MW-6, as well as an increase from 2,950 µg/L to 3,660 µg/L in MW-3. Graphs 1 through 4 depict TPH-DRO concentrations versus time for select monitoring wells. RECOMMENDATIONS: Broadbent recommends continuing with the semi-annual groundwater monitoring and sampling schedule in accordance with the Corrective Action Plan Amendment Approval letter dated February 4, 2020. Site monitor wells MW-2 through MW-8 and MW-10 through MW-14 are scheduled to be sampled in June 2025 to assist with continued evaluation of residual impacts associated with LUST Release ID: MZR. Monitoring wells MW-9 and MW- 13 will be sampled if they are located and access to MW-10 will be further evaluated. LIMITATIONS: The findings presented in this report are based upon observations of field personnel, points investigated, results of laboratory tests performed by Pace Analytical in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee and our understanding of UDEQ practices. Our services were performed in accordance with the generally accepted standard of practice at the time this report was written. No other warranty expressed or implied was made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Pilot Travel Centers LLC. It is possible that variations in soil or groundwater conditions could exist beyond points explored in this investigation. Also, changes in site conditions could occur in the future due to variations in rainfall, temperature, regional water usage, or other factors. REFERENCES: Broadbent & Associates, Inc., 2024. Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report May 2024 Event, Flying J Travel Center #294. June 20, 2024. Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 2005. Initial Screening Levels. November 5. Utah Department of Environmental Quality-Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, 2020. Corrective Action Plan Amendment Approval letter. February 4. Broadbent & Associates, Inc. Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report Salt Lake City, Utah Pilot Travel Center #294/Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Utah January 21, 2025 Page 4 ATTACHMENTS: Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Layout Map Figure 3 Potentiometric Surface Map (11/14/24) Figure 4 Groundwater Analytical Map (11/14/24) Table 1 Groundwater Monitoring and Analytical Schedule Table 2 Groundwater Monitoring and Analytical Results Graphs 1-4 TPH-DRO Concentration and Depth to Water vs. Time for Selected Wells Appendix A: Field Methods Appendix B: Field Data Sheets Appendix C: Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Documentation LIST OF COMMONLY USED ACCRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS: BTEX: benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes LNAPL: light non-aqueous phase liquid DO: dissolved oxygen MTBE: methyl tertiary butyl ether DRO: diesel range organics NO3: nitrate as nitrogen Eh: oxidation reduction potential PAHs: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Fe2+: ferrous iron SO4: sulfate ft/ft: feet per foot SVOCs: semi-volatile organic compounds gal: gallons TOC: top of casing TPH: total petroleum hydrocarbons g/L: micrograms per liter UDEQ Utah Department of Environmental Quality ISLs Initial Screening Levels Site Location Map Pilot Travel Center #294 1670 West 12th Street Ogden, Utah Project No. 19-14-107 Figure Prepared by: JEH Reviewed by: ACM Date: 2/16/21 1 0 SCALE: 1 inch = 3000 feet 3000 6000 LEGEND Site Location W 12th Street Auto Fuel Islands Di e s e l F u e l I s l a n d s S 1 7 0 0 W Pilot Travel Center W 1200 S MW-13 MW-7 MW-14 MW-10 MW-2 MW-8 MW-3 MW-4MW-6 MW-5 MW-12 MW-1 MW-9 MW-11 Site Layout Map Pilot Travel Center #294 1670 West 12th Street Ogden, Utah Project No. 19-14-107 Figure Prepared by: JEH Reviewed by: ACM Date: 2/16/21 2 0 SCALE: 1 inch = 70 feet 70 140 LEGEND Property Boundary (approximate) Monitoring Well LocationMW-2 W 12th Street Auto Fuel Islands Di e s e l F u e l I s l a n d s S 1 7 0 0 W Pilot Travel Center W 1200 S 92.03 92.06 92.11 92.10 92.04 92.02 92.01 92.03 Not Measured MW-13 MW-7 MW-14 MW-10 MW-2 MW-8 MW-3 MW-4MW-6 MW-5 MW-12 MW-1 MW-9 MW-11 92.10 92.14 92.11 Not Measured Not Measured Potentiometric Surface Map (11/14/24) Pilot Travel Center #294 1670 West 12th Street Ogden, Utah Project No. 19-14-107 Figure Prepared by: AGH Reviewed by: ACM Date: 12/18/24 3 0 SCALE: 1 inch = 70 feet 70 140 LEGEND Property Boundary (approximate) Monitoring Well Location and Groundwater Elevation (feet)MW-2 Groundwater Elevation Contour (0.02 feet)92.02 Groundwater Flow Direction (0.001 feet/foot) *Monitoring well not utilized for potentiometric surface depiction W 12th Street Auto Fuel Islands Di e s e l F u e l I s l a n d s S 1 7 0 0 W Pilot Travel Center W 1200 S TPH-DRO < 100 TPH-DRO = 602 TPH-DRO = 514 Not Sampled Not Sampled TPH-DRO = 1,220 TPH-DRO = 3,660 TPH-DRO = 112 TPH-DRO < 100 TPH-DRO < 100 MW-13 MW-7 MW-14 MW-10 MW-2 MW-8 MW-3 MW-4MW-6 MW-5 MW-12 MW-1 MW-9 MW-11 TPH-DRO = 149 TPH-DRO < 100 Not Sampled TPH-DRO < 100 Not Sampled Groundwater Analytical Map (11/14/24) Pilot Travel Center #294 1670 West 12th Street Ogden, Utah Project No. 19-14-107 Figure Prepared by: AGH Reviewed by: ACM Date: 12/18/24 4 0 SCALE: 1 inch = 70 feet 70 140 LEGEND Property Boundary (approximate) Monitoring Well LocationMW-2 TPH-DRO = 602 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Diesel Range Organics (µg/L) Key to Dissolved Groundwater Concentrations* *Concentrations in BOLD exceed UDEQ ISL Regulatory Standards Sample ID Q2 2024 Q4 2024 Q2 2025 Q4 2025 Q2 2026 Q4 2026 Q2 2027 Q4 2027 MW-2 x x x x x x x x MW-3 x x x x x x x x MW-4 x x x x x x x x MW-5 x x x x x x x x MW-6 x x x x x x x x MW-7 x x x x x x x x MW-8 x x x x x x x x MW-9 x x x x x x x x MW-10 x x x x MW-12 x x x x MW-13 x x x x x x x x MW-14 x x x x x x x x TABLE 1 Groundwater Monitoring and Analytical Schedule Pilot Travel Center No. 294 1670 West 12th Street, Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Utah Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Total Xylenes MTBE Naphth- alene TPH-GRO TPH-DRO 5 1,000 700 10,000 200 700 1,000 1,000 300 3,000 4,000 10,000 200 700 10,000 10,000 03/20/13 6.17 93.83 06/12/13 4.59 95.41 08/07/13 5.05 94.95 11/13/13 6.63 93.37 02/17/14 6.54 93.46 04/29/14 6.43 93.57 08/28/14 4.75 95.25 11/20/14 6.59 93.41 02/25/15 7.32 92.68 05/14/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.1J <1.0 0.51J 44.9J 7,720 5.42 94.58 12/08/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.5 <1.0 2.8J <200 303 6.49 93.51 06/01/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 3.7 <1.0 <4.0 <200 105,000 5.33 94.67 12/07/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 3,780 6.49 93.51 06/20/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 2,530 4.71 95.29 12/27/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <200 6.63 93.37 07/05/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 1,380 4.99 95.01 12/18/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 285 6.40 93.60 06/13/19 NM NM 12/16/20 NM NM 06/04/21 665 6.80 93.20 03/02/22 NM 7.89 92.11 06/27/23 730 6.55 93.45 12/05/23 608 7.34 92.66 05/28/24 857 5.73 94.27 11/14/24 149 7.90 92.10 03/20/13 0.29J 1.6J 0.60J 6.5 <2.0 <5.0 <200 187J 5.38 93.86 06/12/13 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 3.82 95.42 08/07/13 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 4.28 94.96 11/13/13 2.6 <2.0 0.49J <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 5.85 93.39 02/17/14 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 5.75 93.49 04/30/14 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 1,040 5.65 93.59 08/28/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <200 <190 3.96 95.28 11/20/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 5.82 93.42 02/25/15 3.4 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 6.53 92.71 05/14/15b NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.65 94.59 06/10/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 4.23 95.01 12/08/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <190 5.72 93.52 06/02/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <200 4.56 94.68 12/06/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <190 5.70 93.54 06/19/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <200 3.33 95.91 12/27/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <190 5.84 93.40 07/05/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <200 4.22 95.02 12/19/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <200 5.62 93.62 06/13/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 <500 <100 3.80 95.44 12/11/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 413 JB <100 4.89 94.35 12/16/20 123 6.99 92.25 06/04/21 110 6.02 93.22 03/02/22 172 7.11 92.13 05/12/22 161 6.00 93.24 11/29/22 121 7.21 92.03 06/27/23 <100 5.76 93.48 12/05/23 <100 6.55 92.69 05/28/24 100 4.97 94.27 11/14/24 <100 7.10 92.14 LNAPL = 0.10 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.06 ft, not sampled MW-2 LNAPL = 0.07 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.06 ft, not sampled (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) TABLE 2 Groundwater Monitoring and Analytical Results Pilot Travel Center No. 294 1670 West 12th Street, Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Utah LNAPL = 0.07 ft, not sampled Relative Groundwater Elevation (feet) Depth to Groundwater (feet btoc)a LNAPL = 0.09 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.16 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.02 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.03 ft, not sampled No longer sampled or gauged as per CAP No longer sampled or gauged as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Well No.Date UDEQ ISL RBCA Tier 1 SL MW-1 Concentrations (µg/L) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Broadbent 294 Analytical Tables 2024 SH Page 1 of 8 Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Total Xylenes MTBE Naphth- alene TPH-GRO TPH-DRO 5 1,000 700 10,000 200 700 1,000 1,000 300 3,000 4,000 10,000 200 700 10,000 10,000 TABLE 2 Groundwater Monitoring and Analytical Results Pilot Travel Center No. 294 1670 West 12th Street, Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Utah Relative Groundwater Elevation (feet) Depth to Groundwater (feet btoc)a LNAPL = 0.16 ft, not sampled Well No.Date UDEQ ISL RBCA Tier 1 SL MW-1 Concentrations (µg/L) 03/20/13 5.06 93.84 06/12/13 3.55 95.35 08/07/13 3.97 94.93 11/13/13 5.52 93.38 02/17/14 5.46 93.44 04/30/14 2.0 <2.0 6.9 50.6 <2.0 3.5J 268 420 5.35 93.55 08/28/14 3.65 95.25 11/20/14 0.28J <1.0 1.3 11.5 <1.0 <5.0 51.4 189J 5.51 93.39 02/25/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 7.1 <1.0 <5.0 44.7J 192 6.21 92.69 05/14/15 4.34 94.56 12/08/15 5.43 93.47 06/02/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 827 4.25 94.65 12/06/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 550 5.40 93.50 06/19/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <200 3.62 95.28 12/27/17 5.53 93.37 07/05/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 615 3.91 94.99 12/19/18 1.3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 591 5.30 93.60 06/13/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 <500 295 3.45 95.45 12/11/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 432 JB 1,600 4.59 94.31 12/16/20 6.81 92.09 06/04/21 3,990 5.71 93.19 03/02/22 6.85 92.05 05/12/22 1,330 5.71 93.19 11/29/22 2,270 6.79 92.11 06/27/23 403 5.45 93.45 12/05/23 3,490 6.26 92.64 05/28/24 2,950 4.64 94.26 11/14/24 3,660 6.80 92.10 03/20/13 196 800 151 1,330 <2.0 38.5 8,740 59,900 4.18 93.84 06/12/13 22.1 2.0 42.1 342 <2.0 6.3 1,190 2,090 2.70 95.32 08/07/13 3.17 94.85 11/13/13 4.69 93.33 02/17/14 2.9 <2.0 2.5 54.5 <2.0 6.8 368 602 4.56 93.46 04/30/14 13.1 <2.0 9.3 193 <2.0 11.7 1,110 1,180 4.47 93.55 08/28/14 31.6 <1.0 40.2 125 <1.0 7.4 592 1,340 2.85 95.17 11/20/14 5.9 <1.0 1.6 1.1J <1.0 1.1J 151 1,100 4.63 93.39 02/25/15 1.4 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 1.5J 135 791 5.33 92.69 05/14/15b NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.44 94.58 06/10/15 26.1 <1.0 5.6 0.70J <1.0 2.8J 365 1,330 3.20 94.82 12/08/15 0.80J <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 1,020 4.54 93.48 06/01/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 2,630 3.42 94.60 12/07/16 0.63J <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 1,190 4.52 93.50 06/20/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 770 2.83 95.19 12/28/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 852 4.64 93.38 07/05/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 1,540 3.08 94.94 12/18/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 998 4.40 93.62 06/13/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 3.54 <1.0 <5.0 <500 1,110 2.60 95.42 12/11/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 440 JB 1,460 3.72 94.30 12/16/20 711 5.78 92.24 06/04/21 377 4.89 93.13 03/02/22 1,310 5.95 92.07 05/12/22 355 4.89 93.13 11/29/22 753 5.94 92.08 06/27/23 459 4.65 93.37 12/05/23 203 5.40 92.62 05/28/24 607 3.81 94.21 11/14/24 514 5.98 92.04(no longer analyzed as per DERR) MW-3 MW-4 (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) LNAPL = 0.06 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.47 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.08 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.35 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.17 ft, not sampled (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) LNAPL = 0.08 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.24 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.2 ft, not sampled (no longer analyzed as per DERR) LNAPL = 0.03 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.15 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.19 ft, not sampled (no longer analyzed as per DERR) LNAPL = 0.06 ft, not sampled (no longer analyzed as per DERR) LNAPL = 0.02 ft, not sampled (no longer analyzed as per DERR) 1.0 (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Broadbent 294 Analytical Tables 2024 SH Page 2 of 8 Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Total Xylenes MTBE Naphth- alene TPH-GRO TPH-DRO 5 1,000 700 10,000 200 700 1,000 1,000 300 3,000 4,000 10,000 200 700 10,000 10,000 TABLE 2 Groundwater Monitoring and Analytical Results Pilot Travel Center No. 294 1670 West 12th Street, Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Utah Relative Groundwater Elevation (feet) Depth to Groundwater (feet btoc)a LNAPL = 0.16 ft, not sampled Well No.Date UDEQ ISL RBCA Tier 1 SL MW-1 Concentrations (µg/L) 06/11/13 7.2 <2.0 9.4 29.9 <2.0 3.1J <200 1,880 2.41 95.15 08/07/13 8.6 <2.0 1.5J 304 <2.0 11.4 1,780 1,170 2.77 94.79 11/13/13 1.1 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 3.2J <200 243 4.25 93.31 02/17/14 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 510 4.13 93.43 04/30/14 0.39J <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 3.2J <200 468 4.05 93.51 08/28/14 0.26J <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <200 543 2.49 95.07 11/20/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 0.63J 31.7J 851 4.21 93.35 02/25/15 <1.0 0.36J <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 91.4 395 4.90 92.66 05/14/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 425 2.98 94.58 12/08/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 913 4.12 93.44 06/02/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 2,000 3.00 94.56 12/07/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 910 4.09 93.47 06/19/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 712 2.50 95.06 12/28/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 1,430 4.19 93.37 07/05/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 267 2.64 94.92 12/18/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 2,610 3.93 93.63 06/13/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 <500 679 2.22 95.34 12/11/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 419 JB 1,710 3.35 94.21 12/16/20 229 5.39 92.17 06/04/21 333 4.52 93.04 03/02/22 906 5.57 91.99 05/12/22 522 4.48 93.08 11/29/22 <100 5.58 91.98 06/27/23 498 4.32 93.24 12/05/23 <100 5.05 92.51 05/28/24 270 3.71 93.85 11/14/24 112 5.55 92.01 06/12/13 22.6 84.4 28.1 265 <2.0 7.6 1,310 2,750 2.75 95.26 08/07/13 28.0 5.7 63.9 504 <2.0 11.3 2,910 5,060 3.17 94.84 11/13/13 7.2 <2.0 15.5 289 <2.0 9.9 1,070 2,260 4.67 93.34 02/17/14 6.5 <2.0 14.8 94.9 <2.0 5.2 596 2,100 4.55 93.46 04/30/14 5.4 <2.0 13.4 47.6 <2.0 5.9 398 1,450 4.45 93.56 08/28/14 2.86 95.15 11/20/14 0.54J <1.0 0.80J 2.9 <1.0 0.99J 130 3,290 4.63 93.38 02/25/15 0.20J <1.0 <1.0 1.1J <1.0 0.66J 151 1,790 5.34 92.67 05/14/15b NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.46 94.55 06/10/15 0.42J <1.0 0.26J <2.0 <1.0 1.1J 109 1,950 3.10 94.91 12/08/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 196 4.55 93.46 06/01/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 25,700 3.46 94.55 12/07/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 3,240 4.51 93.50 06/19/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 3,010 2.84 95.17 12/27/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 3,550 4.62 93.39 07/05/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 2,500 3.09 94.92 12/18/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 2,510 2.22 95.79 06/13/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 <500 5,290 2.65 95.36 12/11/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 435 JB 6,050 3.72 94.29 12/16/20 1,610 5.77 92.24 06/04/21 2,860 4.85 93.16 03/02/22 47,100 4.51 93.50 05/12/22 1,400 4.88 93.13 11/29/22 358 5.90 92.11 06/27/23 568 4.69 93.32 12/05/23 820 5.43 92.58 05/28/24 1,640 4.01 94.00 11/14/24 1,220 5.99 92.02(no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) MW-6 LNAPL = 0.01 ft, not sampled (no longer analyzed as per DERR) MW-5 (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Broadbent 294 Analytical Tables 2024 SH Page 3 of 8 Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Total Xylenes MTBE Naphth- alene TPH-GRO TPH-DRO 5 1,000 700 10,000 200 700 1,000 1,000 300 3,000 4,000 10,000 200 700 10,000 10,000 TABLE 2 Groundwater Monitoring and Analytical Results Pilot Travel Center No. 294 1670 West 12th Street, Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Utah Relative Groundwater Elevation (feet) Depth to Groundwater (feet btoc)a LNAPL = 0.16 ft, not sampled Well No.Date UDEQ ISL RBCA Tier 1 SL MW-1 Concentrations (µg/L) 06/11/13 4.1 <2.0 4.5 4.7 <2.0 <5.0 <200 419 2.85 95.20 08/07/13 <1.0 <2.0 3.4 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 309 3.27 94.78 11/13/13 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 4.72 93.33 02/17/14 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 4.63 93.42 04/30/14 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 2.2J <200 <190 4.54 93.51 08/28/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <200 239 3.01 95.04 11/20/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 228 4.71 93.34 02/25/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 5.40 92.65 05/14/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 3.57 94.48 12/08/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 2,520 4.61 93.44 06/02/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 854 3.03 95.02 12/06/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 368 4.60 93.45 06/19/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 411 2.99 95.06 12/28/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 277 4.70 93.35 07/05/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 311 3.18 94.87 12/18/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 1,530 4.49 93.56 06/13/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 <500 518 2.82 95.23 12/11/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 413 JB 292 3.79 94.26 12/16/20 <100 5.79 92.26 06/04/21 <100 4.93 93.12 03/02/22 <100 5.96 92.09 05/12/22 <100 4.87 93.18 11/29/22 NS NM NM 06/27/23 <100 4.70 93.35 12/05/23 <100 5.55 92.50 05/28/24 112 3.91 94.14 11/14/24 <100 6.02 92.03 06/12/13 4.09 95.40 08/07/13 4.55 94.94 11/13/13 6.12 93.37 02/17/14 6.04 93.45 04/29/14 5.94 93.55 08/28/14 4.24 95.25 11/20/14 6.10 93.39 02/25/15 6.81 92.68 05/14/15b NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.92 94.57 06/10/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 1,100 4.50 94.99 12/08/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 517 6.00 93.49 06/02/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 13,400 4.87 94.62 12/06/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 350 5.99 93.50 06/19/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 7,500 4.21 95.28 12/27/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 278 6.10 93.39 07/05/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <200 4.49 95.00 12/19/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 381 5.89 93.60 06/13/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 <500 612 4.04 95.45 12/11/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 410 JB 500 5.16 94.33 12/16/20 1,750 8.22 91.27 06/04/21 1,850 6.29 93.20 03/02/22 4,700 7.37 92.12 05/12/22 3,050 6.27 93.22 11/29/22 4,950 7.37 92.12 06/27/23 254 6.00 93.49 12/05/23 1,310 7.63 91.86 05/28/24 1,260 5.20 94.29 11/14/24 602 7.38 92.11(no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) MW-7 (no longer analyzed as per DERR) LNAPL = 0.08 ft, not sampled (no longer analyzed as per DERR) LNAPL = 0.08 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.02 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.03 ft, not sampled (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) MW-8 LNAPL = 0.08 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.08 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.09 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.07 ft, not sampled (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Broadbent 294 Analytical Tables 2024 SH Page 4 of 8 Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Total Xylenes MTBE Naphth- alene TPH-GRO TPH-DRO 5 1,000 700 10,000 200 700 1,000 1,000 300 3,000 4,000 10,000 200 700 10,000 10,000 TABLE 2 Groundwater Monitoring and Analytical Results Pilot Travel Center No. 294 1670 West 12th Street, Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Utah Relative Groundwater Elevation (feet) Depth to Groundwater (feet btoc)a LNAPL = 0.16 ft, not sampled Well No.Date UDEQ ISL RBCA Tier 1 SL MW-1 Concentrations (µg/L) 06/12/13 4.31 95.39 08/07/13 4.76 94.94 11/13/13 6.31 93.39 02/17/14 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 2.9J <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 6.22 93.48 04/29/14 6.12 93.58 08/28/14 4.47 95.23 11/20/14 6.29 93.41 02/25/15 7.01 92.69 05/14/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.4 <1.0 <5.0 <50 289 5.10 94.60 12/08/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 216 6.18 93.52 06/01/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 3,170 5.02 94.68 12/07/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.3 <1.0 <4.0 <200 23,000 6.16 93.54 06/20/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 25,400 4.38 95.32 12/27/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <200 6.29 93.41 07/05/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 635 4.68 95.02 12/18/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 263 6.07 93.63 06/13/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 <500 543 4.23 95.47 12/11/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 454 JB 8,150 5.34 94.36 12/16/20 2,980 5.79 93.91 06/04/21 1,920 6.50 93.20 03/02/22 106 7.55 92.15 05/12/22 1,800 6.49 93.21 11/29/22 NS NM NM 06/27/23 NS NM NM 12/05/23 NS NM NM 05/28/24 NS NM NM 11/14/24 NS NM NM 06/11/13 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 2.3J <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 3.60 95.47 08/07/13 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 4.07 95.00 11/13/13 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 5.66 93.41 02/17/14 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 5.62 93.45 04/30/14 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 5.51 93.56 08/28/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <200 <190 3.80 95.27 11/20/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 5.67 93.40 02/25/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 6.41 92.66 05/14/15b NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.52 94.55 06/10/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 4.09 94.98 12/08/15 5.60 93.47 06/01/16 4.44 94.63 12/06/16 5.61 93.46 06/19/17 3.83 95.24 12/27/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <190 5.75 93.32 07/05/18 4.13 94.94 12/18/18 5.55 93.52 06/13/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 <500 <100 3.67 95.40 12/11/19 4.79 94.28 12/16/20 NM NM 06/04/21 <100 5.93 93.14 03/02/22 NM NM 11/29/22 <100 7.04 92.03 06/27/23 <100 5.67 93.40 12/05/23 <100 6.51 92.56 05/28/24 <100 4.85 94.22 11/14/24 NS NM NM(no longer analyzed as per DERR) Not sampled as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) MW-10 MW-9 LNAPL = 0.39 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.22 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.47 ft, not sampled Not sampled as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Not sampled as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Not sampled as per CAP Not sampled as per CAP Not sampled as per CAP LNAPL = 0.17 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.06 ft, not sampled Not sampled as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Not sampled as per CAP Not sampled as per CAP Not sampled as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) LNAPL = 0.11 ft, not sampled LNAPL = 0.06 ft, not sampled Broadbent 294 Analytical Tables 2024 SH Page 5 of 8 Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Total Xylenes MTBE Naphth- alene TPH-GRO TPH-DRO 5 1,000 700 10,000 200 700 1,000 1,000 300 3,000 4,000 10,000 200 700 10,000 10,000 TABLE 2 Groundwater Monitoring and Analytical Results Pilot Travel Center No. 294 1670 West 12th Street, Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Utah Relative Groundwater Elevation (feet) Depth to Groundwater (feet btoc)a LNAPL = 0.16 ft, not sampled Well No.Date UDEQ ISL RBCA Tier 1 SL MW-1 Concentrations (µg/L) 04/29/14 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 6.35 93.55 08/28/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <200 <190 4.57 95.33 11/20/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 6.48 93.42 02/25/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 7.22 92.68 05/14/15b NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.30 94.60 06/10/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 4.83 95.07 12/08/15 6.39 93.51 06/01/16 5.22 94.68 12/06/16 6.38 93.52 06/19/17 4.55 95.35 12/27/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <190 6.53 93.37 07/05/18 4.83 95.07 12/18/18 6.30 93.60 06/13/19 NM NM 12/16/20 NM NM 06/04/21 <100 6.69 93.21 03/02/22 NM NM 06/27/23 <100 6.37 93.53 12/05/23 NS 7.21 92.69 05/28/24 NS 5.54 94.36 11/14/24 <100 7.79 92.11 04/29/14 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 5.60 93.52 08/28/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <200 <190 3.91 95.21 11/20/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 5.77 93.35 02/25/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 6.47 92.65 05/14/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 4.56 94.56 12/08/15 5.67 93.45 06/01/16 4.52 94.60 12/06/16 5.64 93.48 06/19/17 3.88 95.24 12/28/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <190 5.78 93.34 07/05/18 4.18 94.94 12/18/18 5.55 93.57 06/13/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 <500 <100 3.70 95.42 12/11/19 4.84 94.28 12/16/20 6.94 92.18 06/04/21 <100 6.58 92.54 03/02/22 NM NM 11/29/22 128 7.05 92.07 06/27/23 <100 5.89 93.23 12/05/23 <100 6.53 92.59 05/28/24 <100 5.00 94.12 11/14/24 <100 7.09 92.03 04/29/14 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <190 4.22 93.41 08/28/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <200 298 2.77 94.86 11/20/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 280 4.38 93.25 02/25/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 185J 5.07 92.56 05/14/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 3.20 94.43 12/08/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 573 4.29 93.34 06/02/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 2,560 3.51 94.12 12/06/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 421 4.25 93.38 06/19/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 680 2.72 94.91 12/28/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 207 4.37 93.26 07/05/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <190 2.85 94.78 12/18/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 <200 4.10 93.53 06/13/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 <500 <100 2.49 95.14 12/11/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 409 JB 53.0J 3.50 94.13 12/16/20 <100 6.58 91.05 06/04/21 <100 4.70 92.93 03/02/22 127 5.74 91.89 05/12/22 <100 4.60 93.03 Not sampled as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) No longer sampled or gauged as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) No longer sampled or gauged as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Not sampled as per CAP Not sampled as per CAP Not sampled as per CAP MW-13 MW-12 (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Not sampled as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Not sampled as per CAP Not sampled as per CAP No longer sampled or gauged as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Not sampled as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) MW-11 Not sampled as per CAP Not sampled as per CAP Not sampled as per CAP Not sampled as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Not sampled as per CAP (No longer analyzed as per DERR) Not sampled as per CAP (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Not sampled as per CAP Broadbent 294 Analytical Tables 2024 SH Page 6 of 8 Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Total Xylenes MTBE Naphth- alene TPH-GRO TPH-DRO 5 1,000 700 10,000 200 700 1,000 1,000 300 3,000 4,000 10,000 200 700 10,000 10,000 TABLE 2 Groundwater Monitoring and Analytical Results Pilot Travel Center No. 294 1670 West 12th Street, Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Utah Relative Groundwater Elevation (feet) Depth to Groundwater (feet btoc)a LNAPL = 0.16 ft, not sampled Well No.Date UDEQ ISL RBCA Tier 1 SL MW-1 Concentrations (µg/L) 11/29/22 <100 5.74 91.89 06/27/23 <100 4.65 92.98 12/05/23 <100 5.22 92.41 05/28/24 422 3.76 93.87 11/14/24 NS NM NM (no longer analyzed as per DERR) MW-13 (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Broadbent 294 Analytical Tables 2024 SH Page 7 of 8 Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Total Xylenes MTBE Naphth- alene TPH-GRO TPH-DRO 5 1,000 700 10,000 200 700 1,000 1,000 300 3,000 4,000 10,000 200 700 10,000 10,000 TABLE 2 Groundwater Monitoring and Analytical Results Pilot Travel Center No. 294 1670 West 12th Street, Ogden (Marriott-Slaterville), Utah Relative Groundwater Elevation (feet) Depth to Groundwater (feet btoc)a LNAPL = 0.16 ft, not sampled Well No.Date UDEQ ISL RBCA Tier 1 SL MW-1 Concentrations (µg/L) 04/29/14 <1.0 <2.0 <2.0 <3.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 356 5.00 93.54 08/28/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <200 383 3.36 95.18 11/20/14 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 271 5.18 93.36 02/25/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 <190 5.88 92.66 05/14/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <5.0 <50 499 4.03 94.51 12/08/15 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 545 5.07 93.47 06/02/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 1,820 4.32 94.22 12/06/16 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 685 5.04 93.50 06/19/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 194J 3.33 95.21 12/28/17 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 464 5.18 93.36 07/05/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 816 3.60 94.94 12/18/18 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <200 638 4.95 93.59 06/13/19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <5.0 <500 452 3.20 95.34 12/11/19 NA NA 12/16/20 <100 6.29 92.25 06/04/21 171 5.39 93.15 03/02/22 293 6.48 92.06 05/12/22 1,150 5.81 92.73 11/29/22 <100 6.60 91.94 06/27/23 <100 5.15 93.39 12/05/23 <100 5.93 92.61 05/28/24 205 4.33 94.21 11/14/24 <100 6.48 92.06 Data prior to 2020 collected/provided by ATC. Notes and Abbreviations: µg/L = micrograms per liter MTBE = methyl tertiary butyl ether TPH-GRO = gasoline-range total petroleum hydrocarbons TPH-DRO = diesel-range total petroleum hydrocarbons MW-1 14.7 3.90 100.00 btoc = below top of casing MW-2 13.3 3.16 99.24 --= Not applicable MW-3 14.3 3.43 98.90 <= analyte concentration is below the specified practical quantitation limit MW-4 12.9 2.71 98.02 NM = not measured MW-5 11.6 1.41 97.56 LNAPL = light non-aqueous phase liquid MW-6 11.5 1.41 98.01 NA = not analyzed for MW-7 11.6 1.41 98.05 UDEQ = Utah Department of Environmental Quality MW-8 11.0 0.75 99.49 ISL = Initial Screening Level MW-9 11.3 1.07 99.70 bold = sample result exceeds UDEQ ISLs MW-10 11.6 1.60 99.07 Depth to water values in italics indicate that water level is above screened interval MW-11 12.6 2.44 99.90 MW-12 12.6 2.38 99.12a= groundwater has been corrected for LNAPL where present. MW-13 12.6 2.41 97.63 See Table 2 for LNAPL thicknesses.MW-14 12.3 2.15 98.54b= for the May 15, 2015 sampling event, 2 of the 4 coolers were delayed by Fedex, and arrived warm. The affected samples were re-sampled in June. (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Not sampled - inaccessible due to ice Top of Casing Elevation (feet) Well No. Total Well Depth (ft btoc) Top of Screen (feet btoc) MW-14 (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) (no longer analyzed as per DERR) Broadbent 294 Analytical Tables 2024 SH Page 8 of 8 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 De c - 1 3 Ju n - 1 4 De c - 1 4 Ju n - 1 5 De c - 1 5 Ju n - 1 6 De c - 1 6 Ju n - 1 7 De c - 1 7 Ju n - 1 8 De c - 1 8 Ju n - 1 9 De c - 1 9 Ju n - 2 0 De c - 2 0 Ju n - 2 1 De c - 2 1 Ju n - 2 2 De c - 2 2 Ju n - 2 3 De c - 2 3 Ju n - 2 4 De c - 2 4 Ju n - 2 5 De c - 2 5 De p t h t o G r o u n d w a t e r ( f e e t B T O C ) Co n c e n t r a t i o n ( u g / L ) DATE GRAPH 2 MW-6 TPH-DRO Concentration vs. Time Flying J Travel Center No. 294 TPH-DRO Depth to Groundwater 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.00 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 De c - 1 3 Ju n - 1 4 De c - 1 4 Ju n - 1 5 De c - 1 5 Ju n - 1 6 De c - 1 6 Ju n - 1 7 De c - 1 7 Ju n - 1 8 De c - 1 8 Ju n - 1 9 De c - 1 9 Ju n - 2 0 De c - 2 0 Ju n - 2 1 De c - 2 1 Ju n - 2 2 De c - 2 2 Ju n - 2 3 De c - 2 3 Ju n - 2 4 De c - 2 4 Ju n - 2 5 De c - 2 5 De p t h t o G r o u n d w a t e r ( f e e t B T O C ) Co n c e n t r a t i o n ( u g / L ) DATE GRAPH 1 MW-3 TPH-DRO Concentration vs. Time Flying J Travel Center No. 294 TPH-DRO Depth to Groundwater Samples not collected when LNAPL detected in well Page 1 of 2 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.00 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 De c - 1 3 Ju n - 1 4 De c - 1 4 Ju n - 1 5 De c - 1 5 Ju n - 1 6 De c - 1 6 Ju n - 1 7 De c - 1 7 Ju n - 1 8 De c - 1 8 Ju n - 1 9 De c - 1 9 Ju n - 2 0 De c - 2 0 Ju n - 2 1 De c - 2 1 Ju n - 2 2 De c - 2 2 Ju n - 2 3 De c - 2 3 Ju n - 2 4 De c - 2 4 Ju n - 2 5 De c - 2 5 De p t h t o G r o u n d w a t e r ( f e e t B T O C ) Co n c e n t r a t i o n ( u g / L ) DATE GRAPH 4 MW-9 TPH-DRO Concentration vs. Time Flying J Travel Center No. 294 TPH-DRO Depth to Groundwater 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.00 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 De c - 1 3 Ju n - 1 4 De c - 1 4 Ju n - 1 5 De c - 1 5 Ju n - 1 6 De c - 1 6 Ju n - 1 7 De c - 1 7 Ju n - 1 8 De c - 1 8 Ju n - 1 9 De c - 1 9 Ju n - 2 0 De c - 2 0 Ju n - 2 1 De c - 2 1 Ju n - 2 2 De c - 2 2 Ju n - 2 3 De c - 2 3 Ju n - 2 4 De c - 2 4 Ju n - 2 5 De c - 2 5 De p t h t o G r o u n d w a t e r ( f e e t B T O C ) Co n c e n t r a t i o n ( u g / L ) DATE GRAPH 3 MW-8 TPH-DRO Concentration vs. Time Flying J Travel Center No. 294 TPH-DRO Depth to Groundwater Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX A FIELD METHODS Page 1 of 4 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL FIELD METHODS Field methods discussed herein were implemented to provide for accuracy and reliability of field activities, data collection, sample collection, and handling. Discussion of these methods is provided below. 1.0 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION Equipment calibration was performed per equipment manufacturer specifications before use. 2.0 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER AND LIGHT NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID MEASUREMENT Depth to groundwater was measured in wells identified for gauging in the scope of work using a decontaminated water level indicator. The depth to water measurement was taken from a cut notch or permanent mark at the top of the well casing to which the well head elevation was originally surveyed. Once depth to water was measured, an oil/water interface meter or a new disposable bailer was utilized to evaluate the presence and, if present, to measure the “apparent” thickness of light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) in the well. If LNAPL was present in the well, groundwater purging and sampling were not performed, unless sampling procedures in the scope of work specified collection of samples in the presence of LNAPL. Otherwise, time allowing, LNAPL was bailed from the well using either a new disposable bailer, or the disposal bailer previously used for initial LNAPL assessment. Bailing of LNAPL continued until the thickness of LNAPL (or volume) stabilized in each bailer pulled from the well, or LNAPL was no longer present. After LNAPL thickness either stabilized or was eliminated, periodic depth to water and depth to LNAPL measurements were collected as product came back into the well to evaluate product recovery rate and to aid in further assessment of LNAPL in the subsurface. LNAPL thickness measurements were recorded as “apparent.” If a bailer was used for LNAPL thickness measurement, the field sampler noted the bailer entry diameter and chamber diameter to enable correction of thickness measurements. Recovered LNAPL was stored on-site in a labeled steel drum(s) or other appropriate container(s) prior to disposal. 3.0 WELL PURGING AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLE COLLECTION Well purging and groundwater sampling were performed in wells specified in the scope of work after measuring depth to groundwater and evaluating the presence of LNAPL. Purging and sampling were performed using one of the methods detailed below. The method used was noted in the field records. Purge water was stored on-site in labeled steel drum(s) or other appropriate container(s) prior to disposal or on-site treatment (in cases where treatment using an on-site system is authorized). Broadbent & Associates, Inc. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Field Methods Page 2 of 4 3.1 Purging a Predetermined Well Volume Purging a predetermined well volume is performed per ASTM International (ASTM) D4448-01. This purging method has the objective of removing a predetermined volume of stagnant water from the well prior to sampling. The volume of stagnant water is defined as either the volume of water contained within the well casing, or the volume within the well casing and sand/gravel in the annulus if natural flow through these is deemed insufficient to keep them flushed out. This purging method involves removal of a minimum of three stagnant water volumes from the well using a decontaminated pump with new disposable plastic discharge or suction tubing, dedicated well tubing, or using a new disposable or decontaminated reusable bailer. If a new disposable bailer was used for assessment of LNAPL, that bailer may be used for purging. The withdrawal rate used is one that minimizes drawdown while satisfying time constraints. To evaluate when purging is complete, one or more groundwater stabilization parameters are monitored and recorded during purging activities until stabilization is achieved. Most commonly, stabilization parameters include temperature, conductivity, and pH, but field procedures detailed in the scope of work may also include monitoring of dissolved oxygen concentrations, oxidation reduction potential, and/or turbidity1. Parameters are considered stable when two (2) consecutive readings recorded three (3) minutes apart fall within ranges provided below in Table 1. In the event that the parameters have not stabilized and five (5) well casing volumes have been removed, purging activities will cease and be considered complete. Once the well is purged, a groundwater sample(s) is collected from the well using a new disposable bailer. If a new disposable bailer was used for purging, that bailer may be used to collect the sample(s). A sample is not collected if the well is inadvertently purged dry. Table 1. Criteria for Defining Stabilization of Water-Quality Indicator Parameters Parameter Stabilization Criterion Temperature ± 0.2ºC (± 0.36ºF) pH ± 0.1 standard units Conductivity ± 3% Dissolved oxygen ± 10% Oxidation reduction potential ± 10 mV Turbidity1 ± 10% or 1.0 NTU (whichever is greater) 3.2 Low-Flow Purging and Sampling “Low-Flow”, “Minimal Drawdown”, or "Low-Stress” purging is performed per ASTM D6771-02. It is a method of groundwater removal from within a well’s screened interval that is intended to minimize drawdown and mixing of the water column in the well 1 As stated in ASTM D6771-02, turbidity is not a chemical parameter and not i ndicative of when formation-quality water is being purged; however, turbidity may be helpful in evaluating stress on the formation during purging. Turbidity measurements are t aken at the same time that stabilization parameter measurements are made, or, at a minimum, once when purging is initiated and again just prior to sample collection, after stabilization parameters have stabilized. To avoid artifacts in sample analysis, turb idity should be as low as possible when samples are collected. If turbidity values are persistently high, the withdrawal rate is lowered until turbidity decreases. If high turbidity persists even after lowering the withdrawal rate, the purging is stopped for a period of time until turbidity settles, and the purging process is then restarted. If this fails to solve the problem, the purging/sampling process for the well is ceased, and well maintenance or redevelopment is considered. Broadbent & Associates, Inc. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Field Methods Page 3 of 4 casing. This is accomplished by pumping the well using a decontaminated pump with new disposable plastic discharge or suction tubing or dedicated well tubing at a low flow rate while evaluating the groundwater elevation during pumping. The low flow pumping rate is well specific and is generally established at a volume that is less than or equal to the natural recovery rate of the well. A pump with adjustable flow rate control is positioned with the intake at or near the mid-point of the submerged well screen. The pumping rate used during low-flow purging is low enough to minimize mobilization of particulate matter and drawdown (stress) of the water column. Low-flow purging rates will vary based on the individual well characteristics; however, the purge rate should not exceed 1.0 Liter per minute (L/min) or 0.25 gallon per minute (gal/min). Low-flow purging should begin at a rate of approximately 0.1 L/min (0.03 gal/min)2, or the lowest rate possible, and be adjusted based on an evaluation of drawdown. Water level measurements should be recorded at approximate one (1) to two (2) minute intervals until the low-flow rate has been established, and drawdown is minimized. As a general rule, drawdown should not exceed 25% of the distance between the top of the water column and the pump in-take. To evaluate when purging is complete, one or more groundwater stabilization parameters are monitored and recorded during purging activities until stabilization is achieved. Most commonly, stabilization parameters include temperature, conductivity, and pH, but field procedures detailed in the scope of work may also include monitoring of dissolved oxygen concentrations, oxidation reduction potential, and/or turbidity1. The frequency between measurements will be at an interval of one (1) to three (3) minutes; however, if a flow cell is used, the frequency will be determined based on the time required to evacuate one cell volume. Stabilization is defined as three (3) consecutive readings recorded several minutes apart falling within ranges provided in Table 1. Samples will be collected by filling appropriate containers from the pump discharge tubing at a rate not to exceed the established pumping rate. 3.3 Minimal Purge, Discrete Depth, and Passive Sampling In accordance with ASTM D4448-01, sampling techniques that do not rely on purging, or require only minimal purging, may be used if a particular zone within a screened interval is to be sampled or if a well is not capable of yielding sufficient groundwater for purging. To properly use these sampling techniques, a water sample is collected within the screened interval with little or no mixing of the water column within the casing. These techniques include minimal purge sampling which uses a dedicated sampling pump capable of pumping rates of less than 0.1 L/min (0.03 gal/min)2, discrete depth sampling using a bailer that allows groundwater entry at a controlled depth (e.g. differential pressure bailer), or passive (diffusion) sampling. These techniques are based on certain studies referenced in ASTM D4448-01 that indicate that under certain conditions, natural groundwater flow is laminar and horizontal with little or no mixing within the well screen. 2 According to ASTM D4448-01, studies have indicated that at flow rates of 0.1 L/min, low -density polyethylene (LDPE) and plasticized polypropylene tubing materials are prone to sorption. Therefore, TFE -fluorocarbon or other appropriate tubing material is used, particularly when tubing lengths of 50 feet or longer are used. Broadbent & Associates, Inc. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Field Methods Page 4 of 4 4.0 DECONTAMINATION Reusable groundwater sampling equipment were cleaned using a solution of Alconox or other acceptable detergent, rinsed with tap water, and finally rinsed with distilled water prior to use in each well. Decontamination water was stored on-site in appropriately labeled DOT approved steel drum(s) or other appropriate container(s) prior to disposal. 5.0 SAMPLE CONTAINERS, LABELING, AND STORAGE Samples were collected in laboratory prepared containers with appropriate preservative (if preservative was required). Samples were labeled (site name, sample I.D., sampler initials, date, and time of collection) and stored chilled (refrigerator or ice chest with ice) until delivery to a certified laboratory, under chain of custody procedures. 6.0 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD AND PROCEDURE The field sampler was personally responsible for care and custody of the samples collected until they were properly transferred to another party. To document custody and transfer of samples, a Chain of Custody Record was prepared. The Chain of Custody Record provided identification of the samples corresponding to sample labels and specified analyses to be performed by the laboratory. The original Chain of Custody Record accompanied the shipment, and a copy of the record was stored in the project file. When the samples were transferred, the individuals relinquishing and receiving them signed, dated, and noted the time of transfer on the record. 7.0 FIELD RECORDS Daily Report and data forms were completed by staff personnel to provide daily record of significant events, observations, and measurements. Field records were signed, dated, and stored in the project file. APPENDIX B FIELD DATA SHEETS APPENDIX C LABORATORY REPORT AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION ANALYTICAL REPORT December 03, 2024 Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot Sample Delivery Group:L1800990 Samples Received:11/16/2024 Project Number:294-605-13 Description:One Niner 294 - Marriott - Slaterville Site:19-14-107 Report To:Sarah Hamilton 186 East Main Street Suite 99 Sandy, UT 84070 Entire Report Reviewed By: December 03, 2024 [Preliminary Report] Jeff Carr Project Manager Results relate only to the items tested or calibrated and are reported as rounded values. This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. Where applicable, sampling conducted by Pace Analytical National is performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures ENV-SOP-MTJL-0067 and ENV-SOP-MTJL-0068. Where sampling conducted by the customer, results relate to the accuracy of the information provided, and as the samples are received. Pace Analytical National 12065 Lebanon Rd Mount Juliet, TN 37122 615-758-5858 800-767-5859 mydata.pacelabs.com 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 1 of 21 December 04, 2024 Jeff Carr Project Manager ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 1 of 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cp: Cover Page 1 Tc: Table of Contents 2 Ss: Sample Summary 3 Cn: Case Narrative 5 Sr: Sample Results 6 MW-1 L1800990-01 6 MW-2 L1800990-02 7 MW-3 L1800990-03 8 MW-4 L1800990-04 9 MW-5 L1800990-05 10 MW-6 L1800990-06 11 MW-7 L1800990-07 12 MW-8 L1800990-08 13 MW-11 L1800990-09 14 MW-12 L1800990-10 15 MW-14 L1800990-11 16 Qc: Quality Control Summary 17 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 17 Gl: Glossary of Terms 18 Al: Accreditations & Locations 19 Sc: Sample Chain of Custody 20 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 2 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 2 of 21 SAMPLE SUMMARY Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time MW-1 L1800990-01 GW Sarah Hamilton 11/14/24 09:50 11/16/24 08:00 Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location date/time date/time Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 WG2407202 1 11/23/24 17:51 11/28/24 10:34 MAA Mt. Juliet, TN Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time MW-2 L1800990-02 GW Sarah Hamilton 11/14/24 10:25 11/16/24 08:00 Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location date/time date/time Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 WG2407202 1 11/23/24 17:51 11/28/24 10:53 JAS Mt. Juliet, TN Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time MW-3 L1800990-03 GW Sarah Hamilton 11/14/24 12:00 11/16/24 08:00 Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location date/time date/time Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 WG2407202 1 11/23/24 17:51 11/28/24 11:13 MAA Mt. Juliet, TN Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time MW-4 L1800990-04 GW Sarah Hamilton 11/14/24 13:05 11/16/24 08:00 Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location date/time date/time Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 WG2407202 1 11/23/24 17:51 11/28/24 11:33 JAS Mt. Juliet, TN Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time MW-5 L1800990-05 GW Sarah Hamilton 11/14/24 14:10 11/16/24 08:00 Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location date/time date/time Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 WG2407202 1 11/23/24 17:51 11/28/24 11:52 MAA Mt. Juliet, TN Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time MW-6 L1800990-06 GW Sarah Hamilton 11/14/24 12:35 11/16/24 08:00 Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location date/time date/time Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 WG2407202 1 11/23/24 17:51 11/28/24 12:12 MAA Mt. Juliet, TN Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time MW-7 L1800990-07 GW Sarah Hamilton 11/14/24 14:30 11/16/24 08:00 Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location date/time date/time Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 WG2407202 1 11/23/24 17:51 11/28/24 12:32 MAA Mt. Juliet, TN Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time MW-8 L1800990-08 GW Sarah Hamilton 11/14/24 10:55 11/16/24 08:00 Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location date/time date/time Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 WG2407202 1 11/23/24 17:51 11/28/24 12:51 JAS Mt. Juliet, TN 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 3 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 3 of 21 SAMPLE SUMMARY Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time MW-11 L1800990-09 GW Sarah Hamilton 11/14/24 15:15 11/16/24 08:00 Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location date/time date/time Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 WG2407202 1 11/23/24 17:51 11/28/24 13:11 JAS Mt. Juliet, TN Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time MW-12 L1800990-10 GW Sarah Hamilton 11/14/24 13:35 11/16/24 08:00 Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location date/time date/time Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 WG2407202 1 11/23/24 17:51 11/28/24 13:31 JAS Mt. Juliet, TN Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time MW-14 L1800990-11 GW Sarah Hamilton 11/14/24 12:40 11/16/24 08:00 Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location date/time date/time Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 WG2407202 1 11/23/24 17:51 11/28/24 13:50 MAA Mt. Juliet, TN 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 4 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 4 of 21 CASE NARRATIVE All sample aliquots were received at the correct temperature, in the proper containers, with the appropriate preservatives, and within method specified holding times, unless qualified or notated within the report. Where applicable, all MDL (LOD) and RDL (LOQ) values reported for environmental samples have been corrected for the dilution factor used in the analysis. All Method and Batch Quality Control are within established criteria except where addressed in this case narrative, a non-conformance form or properly qualified within the sample results. By my digital signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data have been identified by the laboratory, and no information or data have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data. [Preliminary Report] Jeff Carr Project Manager Sample Delivery Group (SDG) Narrative pH outside of method requirement. Lab Sample ID Project Sample ID Method L1800990-02 MW-2 3511/8015 L1800990-04 MW-4 3511/8015 L1800990-08 MW-8 3511/8015 L1800990-09 MW-11 3511/8015 L1800990-10 MW-12 3511/8015 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 5 of 21 Jeff Carr Project Manager ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 5 of 21 SAMPLE RESULTS - 01 L1800990 MW-1 Collected date/time: 11/14/24 09:50 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch Analyte ug/l ug/l date / time DRO w/ SGT 149 100 1 11/28/2024 10:34 WG2407202 (S) o-Terphenyl 74.7 52.0-156 11/28/2024 10:34 WG2407202 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 6 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 6 of 21 SAMPLE RESULTS - 02 L1800990 MW-2 Collected date/time: 11/14/24 10:25 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch Analyte ug/l ug/l date / time DRO w/ SGT ND 100 1 11/28/2024 10:53 WG2407202 (S) o-Terphenyl 73.7 52.0-156 11/28/2024 10:53 WG2407202 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 7 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 7 of 21 SAMPLE RESULTS - 03 L1800990 MW-3 Collected date/time: 11/14/24 12:00 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch Analyte ug/l ug/l date / time DRO w/ SGT 3660 100 1 11/28/2024 11:13 WG2407202 (S) o-Terphenyl 73.2 52.0-156 11/28/2024 11:13 WG2407202 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 8 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 8 of 21 SAMPLE RESULTS - 04 L1800990 MW-4 Collected date/time: 11/14/24 13:05 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch Analyte ug/l ug/l date / time DRO w/ SGT 514 100 1 11/28/2024 11:33 WG2407202 (S) o-Terphenyl 77.4 52.0-156 11/28/2024 11:33 WG2407202 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 9 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 9 of 21 SAMPLE RESULTS - 05 L1800990 MW-5 Collected date/time: 11/14/24 14:10 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch Analyte ug/l ug/l date / time DRO w/ SGT 112 100 1 11/28/2024 11:52 WG2407202 (S) o-Terphenyl 80.5 52.0-156 11/28/2024 11:52 WG2407202 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 10 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 10 of 21 SAMPLE RESULTS - 06 L1800990 MW-6 Collected date/time: 11/14/24 12:35 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch Analyte ug/l ug/l date / time DRO w/ SGT 1220 100 1 11/28/2024 12:12 WG2407202 (S) o-Terphenyl 80.0 52.0-156 11/28/2024 12:12 WG2407202 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 11 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 11 of 21 SAMPLE RESULTS - 07 L1800990 MW-7 Collected date/time: 11/14/24 14:30 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch Analyte ug/l ug/l date / time DRO w/ SGT ND 100 1 11/28/2024 12:32 WG2407202 (S) o-Terphenyl 74.2 52.0-156 11/28/2024 12:32 WG2407202 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 12 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 12 of 21 SAMPLE RESULTS - 08 L1800990 MW-8 Collected date/time: 11/14/24 10:55 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch Analyte ug/l ug/l date / time DRO w/ SGT 602 100 1 11/28/2024 12:51 WG2407202 (S) o-Terphenyl 68.9 52.0-156 11/28/2024 12:51 WG2407202 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 13 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 13 of 21 SAMPLE RESULTS - 09 L1800990 MW-11 Collected date/time: 11/14/24 15:15 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch Analyte ug/l ug/l date / time DRO w/ SGT ND 100 1 11/28/2024 13:11 WG2407202 (S) o-Terphenyl 73.7 52.0-156 11/28/2024 13:11 WG2407202 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 14 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 14 of 21 SAMPLE RESULTS - 10 L1800990 MW-12 Collected date/time: 11/14/24 13:35 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch Analyte ug/l ug/l date / time DRO w/ SGT ND 100 1 11/28/2024 13:31 WG2407202 (S) o-Terphenyl 80.0 52.0-156 11/28/2024 13:31 WG2407202 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 15 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 15 of 21 SAMPLE RESULTS - 11 L1800990 MW-14 Collected date/time: 11/14/24 12:40 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 Result Qualifier RDL Dilution Analysis Batch Analyte ug/l ug/l date / time DRO w/ SGT ND 100 1 11/28/2024 13:50 WG2407202 (S) o-Terphenyl 72.6 52.0-156 11/28/2024 13:50 WG2407202 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 16 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 16 of 21 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG2407202 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC) by Method 3511/8015 L1800990-01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11 Method Blank (MB) (MB) R4152436-1 11/27/24 09:51 MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL Analyte ug/l ug/l ug/l DRO w/ SGT U 24.7 100 (S) o-Terphenyl 77.5 52.0-156 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) • Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD) (LCS) R4152436-2 11/27/24 10:10 • (LCSD) R4152436-3 11/27/24 10:30 Spike Amount LCS Result LCSD Result LCS Rec.LCSD Rec.Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier LCSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits Analyte ug/l ug/l ug/l %%%%% DRO w/ SGT 1500 1040 1140 69.3 76.0 50.0-150 9.17 20 (S) o-Terphenyl 68.0 66.0 52.0-156 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 17 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 17 of 21 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Guide to Reading and Understanding Your Laboratory Report The information below is designed to better explain the various terms used in your report of analytical results from the Laboratory. This is not intended as a comprehensive explanation, and if you have additional questions please contact your project representative. Results Disclaimer - Information that may be provided by the customer, and contained within this report, include Permit Limits, Project Name, Sample ID, Sample Matrix, Sample Preservation, Field Blanks, Field Spikes, Field Duplicates, On-Site Data, Sampling Collection Dates/Times, and Sampling Location. Results relate to the accuracy of this information provided, and as the samples are received. Abbreviations and Definitions MDL Method Detection Limit. ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable). RDL Reported Detection Limit. Rec.Recovery. RPD Relative Percent Difference. SDG Sample Delivery Group. (S) Surrogate (Surrogate Standard) - Analytes added to every blank, sample, Laboratory Control Sample/Duplicate and Matrix Spike/Duplicate; used to evaluate analytical efficiency by measuring recovery. Surrogates are not expected to be detected in all environmental media. U Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable). Analyte The name of the particular compound or analysis performed. Some Analyses and Methods will have multiple analytes reported. Dilution If the sample matrix contains an interfering material, the sample preparation volume or weight values differ from the standard, or if concentrations of analytes in the sample are higher than the highest limit of concentration that the laboratory can accurately report, the sample may be diluted for analysis. If a value different than 1 is used in this field, the result reported has already been corrected for this factor. Limits These are the target % recovery ranges or % difference value that the laboratory has historically determined as normal for the method and analyte being reported. Successful QC Sample analysis will target all analytes recovered or duplicated within these ranges. Qualifier This column provides a letter and/or number designation that corresponds to additional information concerning the result reported. If a Qualifier is present, a definition per Qualifier is provided within the Glossary and Definitions page and potentially a discussion of possible implications of the Qualifier in the Case Narrative if applicable. Result The actual analytical final result (corrected for any sample specific characteristics) reported for your sample. If there was no measurable result returned for a specific analyte, the result in this column may state “ND” (Not Detected) or “BDL” (Below Detectable Levels). The information in the results column should always be accompanied by either an MDL (Method Detection Limit) or RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) that defines the lowest value that the laboratory could detect or report for this analyte. Uncertainty (Radiochemistry)Confidence level of 2 sigma. Case Narrative (Cn) A brief discussion about the included sample results, including a discussion of any non-conformances to protocol observed either at sample receipt by the laboratory from the field or during the analytical process. If present, there will be a section in the Case Narrative to discuss the meaning of any data qualifiers used in the report. Quality Control Summary (Qc) This section of the report includes the results of the laboratory quality control analyses required by procedure or analytical methods to assist in evaluating the validity of the results reported for your samples. These analyses are not being performed on your samples typically, but on laboratory generated material. Sample Chain of Custody (Sc) This is the document created in the field when your samples were initially collected. This is used to verify the time and date of collection, the person collecting the samples, and the analyses that the laboratory is requested to perform. This chain of custody also documents all persons (excluding commercial shippers) that have had control or possession of the samples from the time of collection until delivery to the laboratory for analysis. Sample Results (Sr) This section of your report will provide the results of all testing performed on your samples. These results are provided by sample ID and are separated by the analyses performed on each sample. The header line of each analysis section for each sample will provide the name and method number for the analysis reported. Sample Summary (Ss)This section of the Analytical Report defines the specific analyses performed for each sample ID, including the dates and times of preparation and/or analysis. Qualifier Description The remainder of this page intentionally left blank, there are no qualifiers applied to this SDG. 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 18 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 18 of 21 Pace Analytical National 12065 Lebanon Rd Mount Juliet, TN 37122 Alabama 40660 Nebraska NE-OS-15-05 Alaska 17-026 Nevada TN000032021-1 Arizona AZ0612 New Hampshire 2975 Arkansas 88-0469 New Jersey–NELAP TN002 California 2932 New Mexico ¹TN00003 Colorado TN00003 New York 11742 Connecticut PH-0197 North Carolina Env375 Florida E87487 North Carolina ¹DW21704 Georgia NELAP North Carolina ³41 Georgia ¹923 North Dakota R-140 Idaho TN00003 Ohio–VAP CL0069 Illinois 200008 Oklahoma 9915 Indiana C-TN-01 Oregon TN200002 Iowa 364 Pennsylvania 68-02979 Kansas E-10277 Rhode Island LAO00356 Kentucky ¹ ⁶KY90010 South Carolina 84004002 Kentucky ²16 South Dakota n/a Louisiana AI30792 Tennessee ¹ ⁴2006 Louisiana LA018 Texas T104704245-20-18 Maine TN00003 Texas ⁵LAB0152 Maryland 324 Utah TN000032021-11 Massachusetts M-TN003 Vermont VT2006 Michigan 9958 Virginia 110033 Minnesota 047-999-395 Washington C847 Mississippi TN00003 West Virginia 233 Missouri 340 Wisconsin 998093910 Montana CERT0086 Wyoming A2LA A2LA – ISO 17025 1461.01 AIHA-LAP,LLC EMLAP 100789 A2LA – ISO 17025 ⁵1461.02 DOD 1461.01 Canada 1461.01 USDA P330-15-00234 EPA–Crypto TN00003 ACCREDITATIONS & LOCATIONS ¹ Drinking Water ² Underground Storage Tanks ³ Aquatic Toxicity ⁴ Chemical/Microbiological ⁵ Mold ⁶ Wastewater n/a Accreditation not applicable * Not all certifications held by the laboratory are applicable to the results reported in the attached report. * Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held by Pace Analytical. 1 Cp 2 Tc 3 Ss 4 Cn 5 Sr 6 Qc 7 Gl 8 Al 9 Sc ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/03/24 19:23 19 of 21 ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE: Broadbent & Associates - UT Pilot 294-605-13 L1800990 12/04/24 07:31 19 of 21