Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDERR-2025-000519 ROD HARRISON LUST SITE 2023 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation Duchesne, Utah Facility ID: R5040031 Revision 1.0 January 13, 2025 Submitted by: Jennifer Davis Robinson, P.G. Date Leaking Underground Storage Tank Unit Approved by: Gunnar Johnson Date Permitting & Cleanup Section Supervisor Land, Chemicals and Redevelopment Division EPA Region 8 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Rod Harrison leaking underground storage tank (LUST) site (the Site) is in the town of Duchesne, Utah, on Trust Land within the exterior boundaries of the Uintah & Ouray Indian Reservation, at approximate decimal geographical coordinates of 40.164° north latitude and 110.401° west longitude in Township 4 South, Range 5 West in the southeast corner of the northeast corner of Section 1. The Site’s physical address is 17 East Main Street, Duchesne, Utah, located at the northeast corner of the intersection of North Center Street and East Main Street (U.S. Highway 40). This report summarizes groundwater data generated from measurements and laboratory analysis of groundwater samples collected at the Site during the April 4, 2023 groundwater monitoring event. Groundwater samples were collected by EPA Region 8 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program personnel. During the April 2023 event, samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-5, MW-6, MW-11, MW-13, MW-18R, and MW-19. Samples were submitted to the Region 8 laboratory for analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, 1,2-dichloroethane, ethylene dibromide, methyl tert-butyl ether, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in the gasoline and diesel ranges, and anions. Contaminant concentrations in all on-site monitoring wells sampled during the April 2023 event were less than their respective maximum contaminant levels (MCLs). Only three of the off-site wells (i.e. MW-14, MW-18R, and MW-19) were accessible for sampling, and these did not contain any petroleum contaminant concentrations above MCLs. Preliminary soil-vapor sample data from a July 2023 investigation suggest two areas of contamination: one area of benzene contamination north of the northeast half of the Chuck’s Meat building, and a second area of benzene and TPH contamination south of the Chuck’s Meat building. The two areas correspond to locations of groundwater monitoring wells that have or have historically had contaminant concentrations detected in groundwater. Once the soil-vapor data is finalized, the Environmental Protection Agency intends to evaluate the data to determine if additional sampling is warranted or if the Site is eligible for risk-based closure. Past remedial actions have removed the contamination source at the Rod Harrison LUST site and, based on the most recent analytical data, contaminant concentrations are stable or decreasing. The EPA intends to conduct a statistical analysis of historical contaminant concentrations at all wells within the monitoring well network with sufficient data and evaluate the soil-vapor sampling data, once finalized. Based on results of the statistical analysis and the soil-vapor investigation, the EPA will determine the next appropriate remedial actions. Until statistical analyses are conducted and final results of the 2023 soil-vapor investigation can be evaluated, the EPA will continue monitoring groundwater contamination at the Site. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 FACILITY BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 1 3.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................................................... 3 4.0 DEVIATIONS FROM THE QAPP ................................................................................................. 4 5.0 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL .................................................................................... 4 6.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT................................................................................................... 4 7.0 SCREENING CRITERIA .............................................................................................................. 5 8.0 DATA PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION ......................................................................... 5 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 7 10.0 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 8 Figures 1 Site Location Map 2 Site Map 3 Groundwater Elevation Map, April 4, 2023 4 Dissolved Groundwater Contaminant Concentration Map, April 4, 2023 Tables 1 Summary of Groundwater Elevation Data 2 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data Appendices A Groundwater Field Sampling Forms, April 4, 2023 B Laboratory Groundwater Analytical Report, April 4, 2023 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes groundwater data generated during sample collection activities at the Rod Harrison leaking underground storage tank (LUST) site (the Site) during the April 2023 groundwater monitoring event. Groundwater samples were collected by the EPA Region 8 LUST Program personnel from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-5, MW-6, MW-13, MW-14, MW-18R, and MW-19. In addition to sample collection, groundwater levels and product levels (where present) were measured. Sampling was performed to characterize site conditions, evaluate contaminant behavior, and evaluate potential remediation strategies. 2.0 FACILITY BACKGROUND The Rod Harrison LUST site is located at 17 East Main Street, Duchesne, Utah, on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Center Street and East Main Street (U.S. Highway 40) (Figure 1), The Site is located on Trust Land within the exterior boundaries of the Uintah & Ouray Indian Reservation at approximate decimal coordinates of 40.164 degrees North latitude and 110.401 degrees West longitude. The Site is located in Township 4 South, Range 5 West, in the southeast corner of the northeast corner of Section 1. Adjacent property usage is light commercial and retail. There is a one-story masonry structure located on the site and a prefabricated, one-story wooden building that is used as a takeout barbeque restaurant located immediately north of the masonry structure. The western portion of the masonry structure is occupied by a butcher shop, and the eastern portion had been used as a garage, although commercial auto maintenance is no longer performed in the building. The area to the south of the masonry building along Highway 40 is paved with concrete, and the area north of the masonry structure and east of the barbeque restaurant is a graded gravel lot that is used for parking and vehicle storage. The Site has about 70 feet of frontage road on the north side of U.S. Highway 40 (Main Street), an undivided, four-lane road that serves as a regional east-west corridor. Several retail and commercial businesses are located to the south, across Highway 40. The Duchesne River Inn is located to the west, on the other side of North Center Street. Ground cover on the south side of the site (south of the building) is concrete, with U.S. Highway 40 to the south. To the north, the lot is graded gravel, and North Center Street, a paved asphalt roadway, is immediately west. The Duchesne River, a perennial stream, is located about 1,100 feet to the northeast of the site and flows generally to the southeast. The local, shallow subsurface sediments at the site consist primarily of silty sand, interbedded locally with gravelly sand and layers of silty clay. Groundwater is relatively shallow at the Site, with measured depth to water ranging from approximately 4.5 to 8 feet below ground surface (bgs). Groundwater flow at the Site is generally to the southeast and may be locally influenced by utility corridors that parallel Highway 40. The Rod Harrison site history is based on information provided by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR). Records 2 indicate that the facility had four underground storage tanks (USTs) installed between 1961 and 1971. Three of the tanks were used to store gasoline and one was used to store waste oil. The facility operated as Rod’s Service, a retail gas station and automobile service shop, from 1961 until the station closed in 1989. The tanks were removed by the owner, Mr. Vernal Bromley, in October 1995. The property was later used as an auto repair shop, which is now inactive. Petroleum contamination was discovered during the excavation and closure of the tanks on October 18, 1995. Heavy soil staining was observed during the tank removal. At that time, soil and groundwater samples exceeded DERR Tier I screening levels. Subsurface investigations conducted by DERR in May 2004, November 2004, and most recently in October 2007, defined the extent of the petroleum release. Investigation results suggested that most of the soil contamination was related to a release at the former dispenser island. Contamination from the release was found to extend off site, beneath Main Street and to several adjacent properties. Despite multiple subsurface investigations, the full extent of soil contamination has not been fully defined. After their subsurface investigations, DERR maintained a long-term groundwater monitoring program at the Site. Their last groundwater monitoring event took place in August 2010. At that time, free product was observed in monitoring wells MW-7, MW-8, MW-9R, and MW-10 at measured thicknesses of 0.86-, 0.05-, 0.23-, and 0.01-foot, respectively. An enhanced fluids recovery effort was launched in October 2010, which removed a total of 27 gallons of free product from the wells. Reportedly, recharge of light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) was marginal after the October 2010 recovery event, and upon re-evaluation of the wells 24 hours after the recovery event, no LNAPL was observed. The EPA took over the Site in 2012. Figure 2 shows the locations of site groundwater monitoring wells installed by the DERR. The EPA began periodic groundwater sampling at the Site in September 2013. Analytical results of groundwater samples collected during the two monitoring events in 2016 indicate that the groundwater contaminant plume generally extends east-southeast from the Site, subparallel to the Duchesne River. The 2016 groundwater sample results showed MCL exceedances for benzene, and concentrations exceeding the DERR Tier 1 Screening Levels for total petroleum hydrocarbons, gasoline range (TPH-G) and total petroleum hydrocarbons, diesel range (TPH-D). Monitoring wells MW-7, MW-8, MW-9R, MW-10, MW-15, MW-16 and MW-20 are located within the traffic lanes of U.S. Highway 40. During the 2021 sampling event, each of these wells were located; however, they had been paved over and/or damaged and were not safely accessible. These wells may be intact but would require coring through the pavement and reinstalling the well vaults before they could be included in the sampling program. With the exception of well MW-15, each of these wells had historically been observed to contain free product and/or elevated contaminant levels . In addition to the wells described above, the EPA has not been able to locate well MW-2 since taking over sample collection in September 2013, and monitoring wells MW-17 and MW-18 were found damaged and no longer suitable for sampling. Well MW-18 was replaced with new monitoring well MW-18R in January of 2022. Additionally, MW-3 was unable to be located during the 2020 monitoring event and monitoring well MW-11 was unable to be located during the 2022 monitoring 3 event. Neither well has been located since and both wells have been removed from the sampling program. LUST Trust Fund Eligibility The Utah DERR determined that the Rod Harrison LUST site was eligible for federal LUST Trust funding. Vernal Bromley owned the facility while his grandson, Rod Harrison, operated the facility. Mr. Bromley closed the business in 1989 and removed the tanks in October 1995. The property was given to Mr. Harrison in December 1995. Mr. Bromley subsequently passed away in February 1996. Rod Harrison was initially evaluated for partial responsible party status as an operator; however, Mr. Harrison was determined by UDEQ to have an inability to pay the characterization and remediation costs. Subsequently, UDEQ determined that the site was not eligible for Utah’s Petroleum Tank Trust Fund, but that it would be eligible for the use of federal LUST Trust Funds since it lies within the exterior boundaries of the Uintah & Ouray Indian Reservation. As a result, DERR decided to transfer the site lead to the EPA in September 2012. 3.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES On April 4, 2023, the EPA Region 8 LUST Program personnel conducted groundwater monitoring activities at the Rod Harrison LUST site. All monitoring activities were performed in accordance with the EPA Region 8 Final Programmatic Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for Groundwater Monitoring (EPA 2023). Depth to groundwater was measured and groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-5, MW-6, MW-13, MW-14, MW-18R, and MW-19 (Figure 2). Prior to sample collection, depth to groundwater below the top of well casing was measured with an interface probe to an accuracy of ±0.01-foot in all accessible site wells (EPA 2023). Free product was not observed in any of the wells sampled. Measurements were recorded on the Groundwater Sampling Field Forms (Appendix A). Samples were collected using low-flow purging and sampling techniques using a peristaltic pump with ¼-inch new polyethylene tubing and silicone tubing in the pump head. Monitoring wells purged and the water quality field parameters (i.e. conductivity, pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO) and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP)) measured at 3- to 5-minute intervals until measurements indicated field parameter stabilization. Field parameters were considered stable once pH, DO, ORP, and conductivity were within specified margins of error for three consecutive readings (EPA 2023). Groundwater was sampled once the field parameters had stabilized by pumping directly into laboratory-supplied bottles. Groundwater samples were collected and submitted to the laboratory for analysis of the following chemicals of concern (COCs): benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), napthalene, and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) via EPA Method 8260B; 1,2- dibromomethane by EPA Method 8011B; and TPH-G and TPH-D via modified EPA Method 8015C. The samples were collected and analyzed to evaluate the extent of contamination and contaminant 4 concentration trends. Following the collection of organic samples, alkalinity and sulfate samples were collected for use in biodegradation evaluation. Samples were analyzed for alkalinity and sulfate by EPA Methods 310.1 and 300.1, respectively. Sample collection dates and times were recorded on the chain-of-custody records. Samples for COCs were preserved according to the requirements of the Laboratory Services Request (LSR) and placed on ice until arrival at the EPA Region 8 Laboratory. EPA personnel documented field activities in a dedicated field logbook or on electronic data sheets using an iPad and followed all quality assurance and quality control procedures described in the Programmatic QAPP for Groundwater Monitoring (USEPA 2023). 4.0 DEVIATIONS FROM THE QAPP Monitoring well MW-12 was unable to be located during the 2023 groundwater monitoring event and was therefore not sampled. No other deviations from the Programmatic QAPP occurred during the 2023 field activities. 5.0 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL Samples were prepared, analyzed, and verified by the EPA Region 8 Laboratory according to the requirements of the LSR and procedures found in the Laboratory Quality Management Plan and the QAPP. Appendix B includes the laboratory reports containing chain-of-custody documents corresponding to the April sampling event. 6.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT All samples collected during the 2023 monitoring event were collected and analyzed according to specified procedures. All laboratory data have been evaluated by an EPA Laboratory Quality Control Officer using verification procedures and guidelines established in the EPA Region 8 Environmental Laboratory Quality Assurance Manual (EPA 1999, 2023). Field quality control (QC) samples were collected from wells during the 2023 sampling event. Specifically, a primary and field duplicate sample pair were collected from monitoring well MW-13, and a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) sample pair was collected from monitoring well MW-19. Laboratory QC parameters were all acceptable for the samples submitted. Table 2 summarizes analytical data for the 2023 and previous sampling events, and the laboratory analytical report (Appendix B) includes laboratory QC data for the 2023 sampling event. Full data verification was completed on 100 percent of the analytical data. The complete verification reports are presented in the laboratory report (Appendix B). The following summarizes quality issues reported for the 2023 samples: - TPH-D sample results corresponding to all samples were flagged “J” for “estimated” due to an exceedance of holding time. - TPH-G sample results corresponding to all samples were flagged “J” for “estimated” due to a continuing calibration criteria failure (low). 5 Overall, laboratory analytical data for groundwater samples are valid and useable for all purposes. The continued calibration error results in a loss of sensitivity of the instrument performing the analysis, ultimately affecting the limits of quantitation; however, no limits of quantitation were elevated above the regulatory screening levels utilized for this project. In instances where holding time was exceeded, the primary sample results are biased low; however, for all affected results (i.e. TPH-D concentrations at all wells), the measured concentrations observed during the current and prior three consecutive years have been less than the applicable screening levels (discussed in Section 7.0) and the QC error is considered inconsequential. Duplicate samples show normal variations and are qualitatively within acceptable ranges of the investigative samples. The trip blanks contained undetectable levels for all analytes. 7.0 SCREENING CRITERIA The following regulatory criteria were used to screen the analytical results from the 2023 sampling event: - The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) MCLs were used as the screening levels for BTEX, 1,2-DCA, and dibromoethane (EDB) in groundwater. - MTBE is a SDWA candidate compound, and the regional tapwater screening level of 14 micrograms per liter (µg/L) was used as the standard. - There are no federally defined standards for TPH-G, TPH-D or naphthalene in groundwater, so Utah’s Tier 1 Screening Levels for naphthalene (700 µg/L), and TPH-G and TPH-D (both 10,000 µg/L) were used as regulatory screening criteria. - Sulfate levels are regulated under the SWDA as a secondary standard with a screening level of 250 µg/L. Groundwater analytical data were compared to the above regulatory levels. Analytical data from this event and from previous sampling events conducted by the EPA are provided in Table 2, along with MCLs and the other relevant regulatory standards discussed in the previous paragraph. Groundwater analytical results from the April 2023 event are presented on Figure 4. 8.0 DATA PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION This section presents results from water level measurements and analytical samples collected during the 2023 sampling event, as well as a summary of historical analytical data. The data presented in this section was utilized to interpret the state of current contaminant plume conditions at the Site and to develop recommendations for future efforts. 8.1 Groundwater Elevation and Flow Direction Groundwater elevations were calculated using surveyed top-of-well casing (TOC) elevations from 2013 and 2023 depth-to-water measurements (Table 1). A groundwater potentiometric surface map was generated for the April monitoring event (Figure 3). Groundwater elevations have fluctuated less than 2.7 feet (with the maximum fluctuation observed in well MW-13) since the EPA began monitoring in 2013. The average hydraulic gradient across the Site during the April 2023 event was approximately 6 0.00325 ft/ft. to the southeast. Based on the interpreted groundwater surface shown on Figure 3, groundwater flow is generally to the southeast subparallel to the Duchesne River, located approximately 1,000 feet northeast of the Site. However, local variations in flow direction and gradient in the shallow groundwater system may occur and are likely associated with seasonal weather variations and the permeability and spatial distribution of subsurface materials. 8.2 2023 Analytical Results Analytical results from groundwater samples collected during the April 2023 sampling event were compared to the screening levels presented in Section 7.0 (Table 2) (Figure 4). Based on the 2023 analytical results, no contaminants were detected in the sampled wells at concentrations greater than the screening levels. However, the following contaminants were detected at concentrations less than the screening levels at the wells indicated: - Benzene at MW-18R; - Ethylbenzene at MW-5, MW-6, and MW-18R; - Naphthalene at MW-5; - Total xylenes at MW-5 and MW-6; - TPH-G at MW-5 and MW-18R; and, - TPH-D at MW-18R. 8.3 Preliminary 2023 Soil Vapor Investigation Summary In July 2023, EPA’s contractor conducted soil vapor sampling at the Rod Harrison LUST site and surrounding areas to draw conclusions about vapor intrusion potential at buildings adjacent to the contaminant groundwater plume and to better delineate the groundwater contaminant plume. Preliminary analytical results of a soil vapor investigation were received in December 2024. These preliminary soil vapor result maps indicate benzene ranging from nondetect to 285 nanograms (ng), with the greatest concentrations detected north of the east half of the on-site building occupied by Chuck’s Meat. A second benzene soil vapor hotspot is located south of Chuck’s Meat. Preliminary results for TPH C5-C8 and TPH C9-C15 in soil vapor show an overlapping area of contamination south of the Chuck’s Meat building, which also overlaps with benzene detections in soil vapor. The TPH C5-C8 and TPH C9-C15 soil vapor results in the identified soil vapor plume range from 59,700 to 241,000 ng and from 17,500 to 97,100 ng, respectively. As previously indicated, the data is preliminary. Additionally, the resulting data must be converted to concentration data, typically presented in micrograms per cubic meter (mg/m3), which is calculated using sample probe uptake rate at each sample point. Once final concentration data is received, it will be evaluated against applicable screening levels by the Region 8 LUST staff and will be used to inform remedial action decisions for the Site. 8.4 Interpretation There were no contaminant detections greater than screening levels in wells MW-1, MW-5, MW-6, MW-11, MW-13, MW18R, or MW-19 during the April 2023 sampling event. Since 2016, only low-level exceedances of benzene (i.e. within one order of magnitude of the MCL of 5 µg/L) have been detected. 7 These exceedances occurred at MW-17 in 2016 at 7.6 µg/L, at MW-3 in 2019 at 6.6 µg/L, and at MW- 11 in 2022 at 5.4 µg/L. Notably, MW-3 is located in the hotspot identified by the 2023 soil-vapor investigation, and MW-11 is located downgradient of MW-3, between the on-site buildings and the adjacent parking lot (Figure 4). The location of well MW-11 did not correlate to soil vapor contaminant hotspots. As previously noted, 13 of the 20 monitoring wells at the Site have either been covered by asphalt during Highway 40 paving operations and are missing or are damaged and unusable, leading to a smaller spatial spread of data points and some uncertainty surrounding contaminant plume and LNAPL migration. Of the damaged or missing wells, free product was historically observed in wells MW-7, MW-8, MW-9R, and MW-10 in 2014. During the next monitoring event in 2016 neither MW-7 nor MW- 10 contained measurable product, and MW-8 and MW-9R could not be assessed because they were paved over. Wells MW-7 and MW-10 were also paved over sometime between the 2016 and 2019 sampling events. Since free product was last observed in May 2014, it is unlikely that it still exists in this area. Monitoring results at MW-18R (replacement well for MW-18), located downgradient of MW-10, in both 2022 and 2023 support this idea, as free product has not been observed in this well and analytical results have been below screening levels in both years. Soil vapor data from the 2023 investigation indicated two primary areas of contamination: one area of elevated benzene north of the east half of the Chuck’s Meat building and one area of elevated benzene and TPH south of the Chuck’s Meat building. The elevated benzene results in soil vapor correspond to the area where MW-2 and MW-3 were installed. Well MW-2 has not been located since 2013, when the EPA took over sampling at the Site, but elevated concentrations of benzene exceeding the MCL at MW-3 were detected in 2019. MW-3 has not been able to be located since 2019. The benzene and TPH plume south of the building cover the area that includes monitoring wells MW-5 and MW-6, where contamination (i.e. xylenes, ethylbenzene, and TPH-D) at concentrations less than screening levels was detected in 2023. The heaviest contamination within the identified TPH and benzene hotspot appears to be in the area of the former tanks, in the southwest corner of the Site. 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Past remedial actions have removed the source of the contamination and, based on results of recent groundwater monitoring events, contaminant concentrations in accessible wells are less than applicable screening levels and are stable or decreasing. The EPA will perform statistical analysis, using a Mann-Kendall or similar method, to confirm concentration trends in each well and to inform remedial action decisions moving forward. Additionally, the EPA intends to evaluate the 2023 soil- vapor concentration data, once finalized, to conclude if vapor intrusion poses a risk, if the Site requires further soil-vapor sampling, or if the Site is a candidate for risk-based closure. Until these analyses and evaluations can be conducted, the EPA will continue to investigate for residual contamination and plume degradation just beyond the off-site boundary as part of the corrective action process in anticipation of a risk-based site closure. 8 10.0 REFERENCES EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]. 2023. Final Programmatic Quality Assurance Project Plan for Groundwater Monitoring for Monitoring Period January 2023 to December 2027. EPA. 1994. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review. EPA 540/R94/012. EPA. 1992. RCRA Ground Water Monitoring: Draft Technical Guidance. OSWER. EPA/530-R-93-001. FIGURES TABLES Well Date Top of Casing Elevation (ft MSL) Depth to Product (ft BTOC) Depth to Water (ft BTOC) Total Well Depth (ft BTOC) Table 1. Groundwater Elevation Data Rod Harrison Leaking Underground Storage Tank Site #5040031, Duchesne, UT Apparent Product Thickness (ft) Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft MSL) MW-1 9/10/2013 5517.19 6.19 5511.00 MW-1 3/26/2014 5517.19 7.35 5509.84 MW-1 6/10/2014 5517.19 6.46 5510.73 MW-1 4/13/2016 5517.19 7.73 5509.46 MW-1 7/13/2016 5517.19 6.53 5510.66 MW-1 7/16/2019 5517.19 6.05 5511.14 MW-1 3/24/2021 5517.19 6.78 5510.41 MW-1 3/22/2022 5517.19 7.14 5510.05 MW-1 4/4/2023 5517.19 6.19 5511.00 MW-3 9/10/2013 5517.67 6.68 5510.99 MW-3 3/26/2014 5517.67 7.79 5509.88 MW-3 4/13/2016 5517.67 8.11 5509.56 MW-3 7/13/2016 5517.67 7.04 5510.63 MW-3 7/16/2019 5517.67 6.49 5511.18 MW-4 3/26/2014 5517.07 7.54 5509.53 MW-4 6/10/2014 5517.07 6.75 5510.32 MW-4 4/13/2016 5517.07 7.87 5509.20 MW-4 7/13/2016 5517.07 6.83 5510.24 MW-5 9/10/2013 5515.54 4.83 5510.71 MW-5 3/26/2014 5515.54 6.05 5509.49 MW-5 6/10/2014 5515.54 5.16 5510.38 MW-5 4/13/2016 5515.54 6.39 5509.15 MW-5 7/13/2016 5515.54 5.22 5510.32 MW-5 7/16/2019 5515.54 4.55 5510.99 MW-5 3/24/2021 5515.54 5.40 5510.14 Tuesday, February 13, 2024 Page 1 of 5 Well Date Top of Casing Elevation (ft MSL) Depth to Product (ft BTOC) Depth to Water (ft BTOC) Total Well Depth (ft BTOC) Table 1. Groundwater Elevation Data Rod Harrison Leaking Underground Storage Tank Site #5040031, Duchesne, UT Apparent Product Thickness (ft) Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft MSL) MW-5 3/22/2022 5515.54 5.80 5509.74 MW-5 4/4/2023 5515.54 4.74 5510.80 MW-6 9/10/2013 5515.18 4.73 5510.45 MW-6 3/26/2014 5515.18 5.90 5509.28 MW-6 4/13/2016 5515.18 6.24 5508.94 MW-6 7/13/2016 5515.18 5.13 5510.05 MW-6 7/16/2019 5515.18 5.32 5509.86 MW-6 3/24/2021 5515.18 5.27 5509.91 MW-6 3/22/2022 5515.18 5.68 5509.50 MW-6 4/4/2023 5515.18 4.60 5510.58 MW-7 3/26/2014 5515.41 5.80 7.18 1.38 5509.27 MW-7 6/10/2014 5515.41 4.98 6.16 1.18 5510.14 MW-7 4/13/2016 5515.41 4.43 5510.98 MW-8 3/26/2014 5514.91 6.20 6.35 0.15 5508.67 MW-8 6/10/2014 5514.91 4.98 6.16 1.18 5509.64 MW-10 3/26/2014 5514.92 5.89 7.12 1.23 5508.72 MW-10 6/10/2014 5514.92 5.25 5.78 0.53 5509.54 MW-10 4/13/2016 5514.92 4.71 5510.21 MW-11 9/10/2013 5515.64 5.26 5510.38 MW-11 3/26/2014 5515.64 6.63 5509.01 MW-11 6/10/2014 5515.64 5.56 5510.08 MW-11 4/13/2016 5515.64 6.67 5508.97 MW-11 7/13/2016 5515.64 5.64 5510.00 MW-11 7/16/2019 5515.64 5.01 5510.63 MW-11 3/24/2021 5515.64 5.78 5509.86 Tuesday, February 13, 2024 Page 2 of 5 Well Date Top of Casing Elevation (ft MSL) Depth to Product (ft BTOC) Depth to Water (ft BTOC) Total Well Depth (ft BTOC) Table 1. Groundwater Elevation Data Rod Harrison Leaking Underground Storage Tank Site #5040031, Duchesne, UT Apparent Product Thickness (ft) Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft MSL) MW-11 3/22/2022 5515.64 6.18 5509.46 MW-12 9/10/2013 5515.43 4.42 5511.01 MW-12 3/26/2014 5515.43 5.73 5509.70 MW-12 6/10/2014 5515.43 4.79 5510.64 MW-12 4/13/2016 5515.43 6.10 5509.33 MW-12 7/16/2019 5515.43 4.16 5511.27 MW-12 3/24/2021 5515.43 5.08 5510.35 MW-13 9/10/2013 5516.15 5.56 5510.59 MW-13 3/26/2014 5516.15 6.75 5509.40 MW-13 6/10/2014 5516.15 5.90 5510.25 MW-13 4/13/2016 5516.15 7.08 5509.07 MW-13 7/13/2016 5516.15 5.97 5510.18 MW-13 7/16/2019 5516.15 4.43 5511.72 MW-13 3/24/2021 5516.15 6.12 5510.03 MW-13 3/22/2022 5516.15 6.52 5509.63 MW-13 4/4/2023 5516.15 5.47 5510.68 MW-14 9/10/2013 5516.29 4.75 5511.54 MW-14 3/26/2014 5516.29 6.28 5510.01 MW-14 6/10/2014 5516.29 5.21 5511.08 MW-14 4/13/2016 5516.29 6.70 5509.59 MW-14 7/13/2016 5516.29 5.32 5510.97 MW-14 7/16/2019 5516.29 4.57 5511.72 MW-14 3/24/2021 5516.29 5.59 5510.70 MW-14 3/22/2022 5516.29 6.01 5510.28 MW-14 4/4/2023 5516.29 4.85 5511.44 Tuesday, February 13, 2024 Page 3 of 5 Well Date Top of Casing Elevation (ft MSL) Depth to Product (ft BTOC) Depth to Water (ft BTOC) Total Well Depth (ft BTOC) Table 1. Groundwater Elevation Data Rod Harrison Leaking Underground Storage Tank Site #5040031, Duchesne, UT Apparent Product Thickness (ft) Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft MSL) MW-15 3/26/2014 5515.47 6.29 5509.18 MW-15 6/10/2014 5515.47 5.39 5510.08 MW-16 3/26/2014 5513.99 6.14 5507.85 MW-16 6/10/2014 5513.99 5.46 5508.53 MW-16 4/13/2016 5513.99 6.38 5507.61 MW-17 9/10/2013 5514.07 5.80 5508.27 MW-17 3/26/2014 5514.07 6.70 5507.37 MW-17 6/10/2014 5514.07 6.09 5507.98 MW-17 4/13/2016 5514.07 6.89 5507.18 MW-17 7/13/2016 5514.07 6.22 5507.85 MW-17 7/16/2019 5514.07 5.38 5508.69 MW-18 9/10/2013 5514.43 4.90 5509.53 MW-18 3/26/2014 5514.43 6.32 5508.11 MW-18 6/10/2014 5514.43 5.60 5508.83 MW-18 4/13/2016 5514.43 6.52 5507.91 MW-18R 3/22/2022 5514.60 5.95 5508.65 MW-18R 4/4/2023 5514.60 4.80 5509.80 MW-19 9/10/2013 5514.58 5.59 5508.99 MW-19 3/26/2014 5514.58 6.49 5508.09 MW-19 6/10/2014 5514.58 5.84 5508.74 MW-19 4/13/2016 5514.58 6.71 5507.87 MW-19 7/13/2016 5514.58 5.92 5508.66 MW-19 7/16/2019 5514.58 5.08 5509.50 MW-19 3/24/2021 5514.58 5.81 5508.77 MW-19 3/22/2022 5514.58 6.22 5508.36 Tuesday, February 13, 2024 Page 4 of 5 Well Date Top of Casing Elevation (ft MSL) Depth to Product (ft BTOC) Depth to Water (ft BTOC) Total Well Depth (ft BTOC) Table 1. Groundwater Elevation Data Rod Harrison Leaking Underground Storage Tank Site #5040031, Duchesne, UT Apparent Product Thickness (ft) Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft MSL) MW-19 4/4/2023 5514.58 4.96 5509.62 MW-20 3/26/2014 5515.45 6.00 5509.45 MW-20 6/10/2014 5515.45 5.64 5509.81 Notes: ft = feet BTOC = below top of casing MSL = mean sea level If LNAPL was measured, the groundwater elevation was corrected using an LNAPL specific gravity of 0.75 Tuesday, February 13, 2024 Page 5 of 5 Well Date Benzene Ethyl Benzene Toluene Total Xylenes Methyl tert- Butyl Ether Naphthalene*1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dibromoethane TPH-G TPH-D Alkalinity (mg/L) Sulfate (mg/L) Screening Level Screening Level Source 700 µg/L MCL 1000 µg/L MCL 10000 µg/L MCL 14 µg/L USEPA RSL 700 µg/L State* 5 µg/L MCL 0.05 µg/L MCL 10000 µg/L State* 10000 µg/L State* NA NA 250 mg/L SMCL 5 µg/L MCL Table 2. Groundwater Concentration Data Rod Harrison Leaking Underground Storage Tank Site #5040031, Duchesne, UT MW-1 7/16/2019 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <40.0 <400 488 364 MW-1 3/24/2021 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 <400 418 372 MW-1 3/22/2022 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 537 J 423 384 MW-1 4/4/2023 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 J <400 J 405 383 MW-3 7/16/2019 6.6 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <40.0 460 475 425 MW-5 7/16/2019 <2.0 29.0 <2.0 24.6 <2.0 4.6 <0.010 611 J 428 577 317 MW-5 3/24/2021 <2.0 22.4 <2.0 22.9 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <0.010 244 457 480 413 MW-5 3/22/2022 <2.0 22.9 <2.0 20.9 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <0.010 431 J 696 J 492 379 MW-5 4/4/2023 <2.0 10.6 <2.0 20.7 <2.0 3.4 <2.0 <0.010 282 J <400 J 451 437 MW-5-DUP 3/24/2021 <2.0 41.0 <2.0 105.3 <2.0 5.2 <2.0 <0.010 738 687 493 414 MW-6 7/16/2019 <1.0 1.8 <1.0 <3 <1.0 1.2 <0.010 137 J 407 529 393 MW-6 3/22/2022 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 527 J 460 432 MW-6 4/4/2023 <1.0 1.6 <1.0 2.2 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 J <400 J 459 439 MW-6-DUP 3/22/2022 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 <400 459 433 MW-7 7/16/2019 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 50.6 J <400 547 349 MW-7-DUP 7/16/2019 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 50.4 J <400 547 350 MW-11 7/16/2019 <1.0 6.1 <1.0 12.6 <1.0 7.0 <0.010 539 J 720 564 418 MW-11 3/22/2022 5.4 <1.0 <1.0 2 <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 <400 J 442 434 MW-12 7/16/2019 <1.0 1.6 1.0 <3 <1.0 2.1 <0.010 476 J 403 621 250 MW-12 3/24/2021 <1.0 25.2 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 792 663 670 223 MW-13 3/24/2021 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 J <0.010 <100 <400 418 413 MW-13 3/22/2022 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 548 J 431 406 MW-13 4/4/2023 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 J <400 J 430 425 MW-13 DUP 4/4/2023 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 J <400 J 429 426 MW-14 7/16/2019 1.3 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <40.0 <400 523 304 Page 1 of 2 Well Date Benzene Ethyl Benzene Toluene Total Xylenes Methyl tert- Butyl Ether Naphthalene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dibromoethane TPH-G TPH-D Alkalinity (mg/L) Sulfate (mg/L) Screening Level Screening Level Source 700 µg/L MCL 1000 µg/L MCL 10000 µg/L MCL 14 µg/L USEPA RSL 700 µg/L USEPA RSL 5 µg/L MCL 0.05 µg/L MCL 10000 µg/L State 10000 µg/L State NA NA 250 mg/L SMCL 5 µg/L MCL Table 2. Groundwater Concentration Data Rod Harrison Leaking Underground Storage Tank Site #5040031, Duchesne, UT MW-14 4/4/2023 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 J <400 J 446 379 MW-18R 3/22/2022 4.8 5.2 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 250 J 1020 J 713 85.9 MW-18R 4/4/2023 3.3 2.2 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 134 J 805 J 778 152 MW-19 7/16/2019 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <40.0 <400 460 114 MW-19 3/24/2021 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 <400 354 116 MW-19 3/22/2022 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 <400 J 398 101 MW-19 4/4/2023 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.010 <100 J <400 J 430 131 Notes: Page 2 of 2 All values reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L) unless otherwise indicated. Values above MCL or other applicable screening level reported in bold. J = estimated value MCL = maximum contaminant level mg/L = milligrams per liter NA = not analyzed or not applicable RSL = US EPA Regional Screening Level (Tapwater) TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline range (TPH-G) or diesel range (TPH-D) SMCL = secondary MCL *State screening level source is the Utah Tier I Screening Criteria for TPH-gasoline and diesel, and the Utah Initial Screening Level for naphthalene (November 2005). APPENDIX A Groundwater Field Sampling Forms U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 – Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program Groundwater Sampling Field Form Submitted By: jfitzgib_EPA Submitted Time: April 5, 2023 5:12 AM Site Name: Rod Harrison Reservation: Uintah & Ouray Indian Reservation Date: April 4, 2023 Sampler(s): Jeff Fitzgibbons, Patrick Juancorena, Andy Woodward Location: Duchesne Weather: Clouds Temperature (°F): 27 Purge Data Well ID: MW-1 Casing Diameter (in.): 1.5 Depth to Water (ft BTOC): 6.19 Total Well Depth (ft BTOC): 15 Water Column (ft): 8.81 Casing Volume (gallons): 0.81 Pump Depth (ft BTOC): 10.6 Sampling Type: Low Flow Purge Device: Peristaltic Pump Water Quality Meter: YSI 556 MPS S/N 05D2374AL Property Tag# B00591 Stabilization Parameters Time Water Temp (°C) Dissolved O2 (mg/L) pH (s.u.) Conductivity (µS/cm) ORP (mV) Total Volume Purged (gal): 0.1 Sampling Data Sample Date: April 4, 2023 Sample Time: 12:30 Odor: QA/QC Samples Collected: Comments: Sample Analysis: • BTEX/MTBE TPH-GRO (EPA 8260B/8015C) • TPH-DRO (EPA 8015C) • 1,2-dibromoethane (EPA 8011B) • Alkalinity (EPA 310.1) • Sulfate as SO4 (EPA 300.1) Sampler Signature U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 – Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program Groundwater Sampling Field Form Submitted By: jfitzgib_EPA Submitted Time: April 5, 2023 5:12 AM Site Name: Rod Harrison Reservation: Uintah & Ouray Indian Reservation Date: April 4, 2023 Sampler(s): Jeff Fitzgibbons, Patrick Juancorena, Andy Woodward Location: Duchesne Weather: Clouds Temperature (°F): 28 Purge Data Well ID: MW-5 Casing Diameter (in.): 1.5 Depth to Water (ft BTOC): 4.74 Total Well Depth (ft BTOC): 15 Water Column (ft): 10.26 Casing Volume (gallons): 0.94 Pump Depth (ft BTOC): 9.9 Sampling Type: Low Flow Purge Device: Peristaltic Pump Water Quality Meter: YSI 556 MPS S/N 05D2374AL Property Tag# B00591 Stabilization Parameters Time Water Temp (°C) Dissolved O2 (mg/L) pH (s.u.) Conductivity (µS/cm) ORP (mV) Total Volume Purged (gal): 0.1 Sampling Data Sample Date: April 4, 2023 Sample Time: 12:45 Odor: QA/QC Samples Collected: Comments: Sample Analysis: • BTEX/MTBE TPH-GRO (EPA 8260B/8015C) • TPH-DRO (EPA 8015C) • 1,2-dibromoethane (EPA 8011B) • Alkalinity (EPA 310.1) • Sulfate as SO4 (EPA 300.1) Sampler Signature U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 – Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program Groundwater Sampling Field Form Submitted By: jfitzgib_EPA Submitted Time: April 5, 2023 5:12 AM Site Name: Rod Harrison Reservation: Uintah & Ouray Indian Reservation Date: April 4, 2023 Sampler(s): Jeff Fitzgibbons, Patrick Juancorena, Andy Woodward Location: Duchesne Weather: Clouds Temperature (°F): 28 Purge Data Well ID: MW-6 Casing Diameter (in.): 1.5 Depth to Water (ft BTOC): 4.6 Total Well Depth (ft BTOC): 15 Water Column (ft): 10.4 Casing Volume (gallons): 0.95 Pump Depth (ft BTOC): 9.8 Sampling Type: Low Flow Purge Device: Peristaltic Pump Water Quality Meter: YSI 556 MPS S/N 05D2374AL Property Tag# B00591 Stabilization Parameters Time Water Temp (°C) Dissolved O2 (mg/L) pH (s.u.) Conductivity (µS/cm) ORP (mV) Total Volume Purged (gal): 0.1 Sampling Data Sample Date: April 4, 2023 Sample Time: 13:05 Odor: QA/QC Samples Collected: Comments: Sample Analysis: • BTEX/MTBE TPH-GRO (EPA 8260B/8015C) • TPH-DRO (EPA 8015C) • 1,2-dibromoethane (EPA 8011B) • Alkalinity (EPA 310.1) • Sulfate as SO4 (EPA 300.1) Sampler Signature U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 – Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program Groundwater Sampling Field Form Submitted By: jfitzgib_EPA Submitted Time: April 5, 2023 5:12 AM Site Name: Rod Harrison Reservation: Uintah & Ouray Indian Reservation Date: April 4, 2023 Sampler(s): Jeff Fitzgibbons, Patrick Juancorena, Andy Woodward Location: Duchesne Weather: Clouds Temperature (°F): 28 Purge Data Well ID: MW-13 Casing Diameter (in.): 1.5 Depth to Water (ft BTOC): 5.47 Total Well Depth (ft BTOC): 15 Water Column (ft): 9.53 Casing Volume (gallons): 0.87 Pump Depth (ft BTOC): 10.2 Sampling Type: Low Flow Purge Device: Peristaltic Pump Water Quality Meter: YSI 556 MPS S/N 05D2374AL Property Tag# B00591 Stabilization Parameters Time Water Temp (°C) Dissolved O2 (mg/L) pH (s.u.) Conductivity (µS/cm) ORP (mV) Total Volume Purged (gal): 0.1 Sampling Data Sample Date: April 4, 2023 Sample Time: 12:53 Odor: QA/QC Samples Collected: Duplicate Comments: Sample Analysis: • BTEX/MTBE TPH-GRO (EPA 8260B/8015C) • TPH-DRO (EPA 8015C) • 1,2-dibromoethane (EPA 8011B) • Alkalinity (EPA 310.1) • Sulfate as SO4 (EPA 300.1) Sampler Signature U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 – Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program Groundwater Sampling Field Form Submitted By: jfitzgib_EPA Submitted Time: April 5, 2023 5:12 AM Site Name: Rod Harrison Reservation: Uintah & Ouray Indian Reservation Date: April 4, 2023 Sampler(s): Jeff Fitzgibbons, Patrick Juancorena, Andy Woodward Location: Duchesne Weather: Clouds Temperature (°F): 27 Purge Data Well ID: MW-14 Casing Diameter (in.): 2 Depth to Water (ft BTOC): 4.85 Total Well Depth (ft BTOC): 15 Water Column (ft): 10.15 Casing Volume (gallons): 1.66 Pump Depth (ft BTOC): 9.9 Sampling Type: Low Flow Purge Device: Peristaltic Pump Water Quality Meter: YSI 556 MPS S/N 05D2374AL Property Tag# B00591 Stabilization Parameters Time Water Temp (°C) Dissolved O2 (mg/L) pH (s.u.) Conductivity (µS/cm) ORP (mV) Total Volume Purged (gal): 0.2 Sampling Data Sample Date: April 4, 2023 Sample Time: 12:35 Odor: None QA/QC Samples Collected: Comments: Sample Analysis: • BTEX/MTBE TPH-GRO (EPA 8260B/8015C) • TPH-DRO (EPA 8015C) • 1,2-dibromoethane (EPA 8011B) • Alkalinity (EPA 310.1) • Sulfate as SO4 (EPA 300.1) Sampler Signature U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 – Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program Groundwater Sampling Field Form Submitted By: jfitzgib_EPA Submitted Time: April 5, 2023 5:12 AM Site Name: Rod Harrison Reservation: Uintah & Ouray Indian Reservation Date: April 4, 2023 Sampler(s): Jeff Fitzgibbons, Patrick Juancorena, Andy Woodward Location: Duchesne Weather: Clouds Temperature (°F): 28 Purge Data Well ID: MW-18R Casing Diameter (in.): 2 Depth to Water (ft BTOC): 4.8 Total Well Depth (ft BTOC): 20 Water Column (ft): 15.2 Casing Volume (gallons): 2.48 Pump Depth (ft BTOC): 12.4 Sampling Type: Low Flow Purge Device: Peristaltic Pump Water Quality Meter: YSI 556 MPS S/N 05D2374AL Property Tag# B00591 Stabilization Parameters Time Water Temp (°C) Dissolved O2 (mg/L) pH (s.u.) Conductivity (µS/cm) ORP (mV) Total Volume Purged (gal): 0.1 Sampling Data Sample Date: April 4, 2023 Sample Time: 14:25 Odor: QA/QC Samples Collected: Comments: Sample Analysis: • BTEX/MTBE TPH-GRO (EPA 8260B/8015C) • TPH-DRO (EPA 8015C) • 1,2-dibromoethane (EPA 8011B) • Alkalinity (EPA 310.1) • Sulfate as SO4 (EPA 300.1) Sampler Signature U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 – Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program Groundwater Sampling Field Form Submitted By: jfitzgib_EPA Submitted Time: April 5, 2023 5:12 AM Site Name: Rod Harrison Reservation: Uintah & Ouray Indian Reservation Date: April 4, 2023 Sampler(s): Jeff Fitzgibbons, Patrick Juancorena, Andy Woodward Location: Duchesne Weather: Clouds Temperature (°F): 27 Purge Data Well ID: MW-19 Casing Diameter (in.): 2 Depth to Water (ft BTOC): 4.96 Total Well Depth (ft BTOC): 20 Water Column (ft): 15.04 Casing Volume (gallons): 2.45 Pump Depth (ft BTOC): 12.5 Sampling Type: Low Flow Purge Device: Peristaltic Pump Water Quality Meter: YSI 556 MPS S/N 05D2374AL Property Tag# B00591 Stabilization Parameters Time Water Temp (°C) Dissolved O2 (mg/L) pH (s.u.) Conductivity (µS/cm) ORP (mV) Total Volume Purged (gal): 0.1 Sampling Data Sample Date: April 4, 2023 Sample Time: 14:07 Odor: QA/QC Samples Collected: MS/MSD Comments: Sample Analysis: • BTEX/MTBE TPH-GRO (EPA 8260B/8015C) • TPH-DRO (EPA 8015C) • 1,2-dibromoethane (EPA 8011B) • Alkalinity (EPA 310.1) • Sulfate as SO4 (EPA 300.1) Sampler Signature APPENDIX B Laboratory Analytical Report UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 8 LABORATORY 1 Denver Federal Center Building 25, Entrance E-3 Lakewood, CO 80225 R08-LSASD-LSB MEMORANDUM SUBJECT:Analytical Results for Rod Harrison / 2304004 FROM:David Nguyen, Organic Chemist Jesse Kiernan, Organic Chemist Kenneth Dahlin, Analytical Chemist Jason Nakatsu, Laboratory Services Branch Manager (Acting) TO:Patrick Juancorena, R08-LCRD-R8 Leaking Underground Storage Tank/UST Attached are the analytical results for Rod Harrison 2304004. The table below shows the number of containers received, the work order number(s) assigned by the lab and the date received: 44 4406-Apr-2023 Total2304004 The above samples were prepared and analyzed by the EPA Region 8 Laboratory according to the requirements of the Laboratory Services Request (LSR) and the procedures referenced in the laboratory Quality Assurance Manual (QSP-001 v2.1). The laboratory will dispose of the tested water samples two months after the date on this final report. If the samples need to be retained for longer than two months, please email eisenhauer.brian@epa.gov. Page 1 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 General Notes : Quality Control pages: These pages list the routine QC results such as blanks, matrix spikes, and laboratory duplicates, etc. The QC results shown may not be applicable and may not affect the data usability. Appendix A - Exceptions Report: This section may be blank. It lists deviations from acceptable sample receipt conditions, field measurement QC criteria, holding times, or QC acceptance criteria. Appendix B - Samples and Analysis: This section summarizes the number of samples received, the analysis performed and the method employed. Appendix C - Data Assessment Guidelines: This table summarizes the guidelines used by the Region 8 Laboratory to qualify data. This is a general table and may or may not be applicable to this project. Other issues experienced during the analysis: This section (below) may be blank. It's a place where the analysts can explain any issues experienced during the analysis and/or sampling. The issues listed in Appendix A are generally not covered below because it would be redundant to do so. All sample results were reported on an as-received basis unless noted in this section. Other issues experienced during the analysis ( narrative ): METHOD: Determination of Diesel Range Organics using EPA Method 8015D Modified (SOP ORGM-508) ANALYST(S): J. Kiernan Analysis Notes: The holding times for DRO were exceed for all samples in this project due to a lack of adequate laboratory personell to handle the work load. Page 2 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Page 3 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Inorganic Chemistry Parameters MW-1Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:30 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-01 D Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor Alkalinity 25.0 KEDmg/L 2300038EPA 310.1 04/11/20234055 Sulfate as SO4 30.0 DNmg/L 2300096EPA 300.0 05/01/202338310 MW-14Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:35 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-02 D Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor Alkalinity 25.0 KEDmg/L 2300038EPA 310.1 04/11/20234465 Sulfate as SO4 30.0 DNmg/L 2300096EPA 300.0 05/02/202337910 MW-5Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:45 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-03 D Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor Alkalinity 25.0 KEDmg/L 2300038EPA 310.1 04/11/20234515 Sulfate as SO4 30.0 DNmg/L 2300096EPA 300.0 05/02/202343710 MW-13Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:53 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-04 D Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor Alkalinity 25.0 KEDmg/L 2300038EPA 310.1 04/11/20234305 Sulfate as SO4 30.0 DNmg/L 2300096EPA 300.0 05/02/202342510 MW-13 DUPStation ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:53 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-05 D Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor Alkalinity 25.0 KEDmg/L 2300038EPA 310.1 04/11/20234295 Sulfate as SO4 30.0 DNmg/L 2300096EPA 300.0 05/02/202342610 Page 4 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Inorganic Chemistry Parameters MW-6Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 13:05 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-06 D Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor Alkalinity 25.0 KEDmg/L 2300038EPA 310.1 04/11/20234595 Sulfate as SO4 30.0 DNmg/L 2300096EPA 300.0 05/02/202343910 MW-19Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 14:07 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-07 D Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor Alkalinity 25.0 KEDmg/L 2300038EPA 310.1 04/11/20234305 Sulfate as SO4 3.00 DNmg/L 2300096EPA 300.0 05/02/20231311 MW-18RStation ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 14:25 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-08 D Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor Alkalinity 25.0 KEDmg/L 2300038EPA 310.1 04/11/20237785 Sulfate as SO4 3.00 DNmg/L 2300096EPA 300.0 05/02/20231521 Page 5 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 EDB and DBCP by EPA Method 8011 MW-1Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:30 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-01 B Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.010 JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromoethane 0.010 MW-14Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:35 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-02 B Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.010 JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromoethane 0.010 MW-5Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:45 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-03 B Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.010 JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromoethane 0.010 MW-13Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:53 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-04 B Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.010 JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromoethane 0.010 MW-13 DUPStation ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:53 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-05 B Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.010 JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromoethane 0.010 Page 6 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 EDB and DBCP by EPA Method 8011 MW-6Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 13:05 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-06 B Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.010 JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromoethane 0.010 MW-19Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 14:07 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-07 B Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.010 JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromoethane 0.010 MW-18RStation ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 14:25 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-08 B Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.010 JAKug/L 2300048EPA 8011 04/19/2023< 0.010 11,2-Dibromoethane 0.010 Page 7 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 TVPH/BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene by GC/MS MW-1Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:30 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-01 A Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,2-Dichloroethane 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Benzene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Ethyl Benzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 2.0 1m,p-Xylene 2.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Naphthalene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1o-Xylene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Toluene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 100 1TPH as Gasoline 100J Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Limit 70-13097.1 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane Limit 70-130102 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 Limit 70-13098.9 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 MW-14Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:35 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-02 A Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,2-Dichloroethane 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Benzene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Ethyl Benzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 2.0 1m,p-Xylene 2.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Naphthalene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1o-Xylene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Toluene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 100 1TPH as Gasoline 100J Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Limit 70-13097.3 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane Limit 70-13097.2 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 Limit 70-130100 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Page 8 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 TVPH/BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene by GC/MS MW-5Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:45 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-03 A Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/202321.0 2 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 2.0 21,2-Dichloroethane 2.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 2.0 21,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 2.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 2.0 2Benzene2.0 Ethyl Benzene 2.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/202310.6 2 m,p-Xylene 4.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/202320.7 2 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 2.0 2Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 2.0 Naphthalene 2.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/20233.4 2 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 2.0 2o-Xylene 2.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 2.0 2Toluene2.0 TPH as Gasoline 200 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/20232822J Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Limit 70-13099.7 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane Limit 70-130100 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 Limit 70-130100 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 MW-13Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:53 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-04 A Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/20231.3 1 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,2-Dichloroethane 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Benzene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Ethyl Benzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 2.0 1m,p-Xylene 2.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Naphthalene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1o-Xylene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Toluene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 100 1TPH as Gasoline 100J Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Limit 70-130100 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane Limit 70-130102 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 Limit 70-130100 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Page 9 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 TVPH/BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene by GC/MS MW-13 DUPStation ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:53 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-05 A Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/20231.3 1 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,2-Dichloroethane 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Benzene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Ethyl Benzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 2.0 1m,p-Xylene 2.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Naphthalene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1o-Xylene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Toluene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 100 1TPH as Gasoline 100J Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Limit 70-13098.9 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane Limit 70-13099.7 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 Limit 70-130101 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 MW-6Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 13:05 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-06 A Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/20231.0 1 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,2-Dichloroethane 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Benzene1.0 Ethyl Benzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/20231.6 1 m,p-Xylene 2.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/20232.2 1 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Naphthalene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1o-Xylene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Toluene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 100 1TPH as Gasoline 100J Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Limit 70-13097.1 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane Limit 70-130100 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 Limit 70-130101 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Page 10 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 TVPH/BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene by GC/MS MW-19Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 14:07 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-07 A Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,2-Dichloroethane 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Benzene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Ethyl Benzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 2.0 1m,p-Xylene 2.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Naphthalene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1o-Xylene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Toluene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 100 1TPH as Gasoline 100J Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Limit 70-13097.8 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane Limit 70-13099.9 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 Limit 70-130100 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 MW-18RStation ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 14:25 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-08 A Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,2-Dichloroethane 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 Benzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/20233.3 1 Ethyl Benzene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/20232.2 1 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 2.0 1m,p-Xylene 2.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Naphthalene1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1o-Xylene 1.0 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/2023< 1.0 1Toluene1.0 TPH as Gasoline 100 JAKug/L 23000428260/8015 04/14/20231341J Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene Limit 70-130101 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane Limit 70-13095.9 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 Limit 70-13099.9 %JAK 230004204/14/20231 Page 11 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by 8015 DRO MW-1Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:30 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-01 C Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300056EPA 8015 05/05/2023< 400 1Diesel range organics 400J Surrogate: o-Terphenyl Limit 60-14077.7 %JAK 230005605/05/20231 MW-14Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:35 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-02 C Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300056EPA 8015 05/05/2023< 400 1Diesel range organics 400J Surrogate: o-Terphenyl Limit 60-14075.5 %JAK 230005605/05/20231 MW-5Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:45 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-03 C Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300056EPA 8015 05/05/2023< 400 1Diesel range organics 400J Surrogate: o-Terphenyl Limit 60-14069.5 %JAK 230005605/05/20231 MW-13Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:53 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-04 C Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300056EPA 8015 05/05/2023< 400 1Diesel range organics 400J Surrogate: o-Terphenyl Limit 60-14083.0 %JAK 230005605/05/20231 MW-13 DUPStation ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 12:53 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-05 C Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300056EPA 8015 05/05/2023< 400 1Diesel range organics 400J Surrogate: o-Terphenyl Limit 60-14085.1 %JAK 230005605/05/20231 Page 12 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by 8015 DRO MW-6Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 13:05 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-06 C Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300056EPA 8015 05/05/2023< 400 1Diesel range organics 400J Surrogate: o-Terphenyl Limit 60-14077.5 %JAK 230005605/05/20231 MW-19Station ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 14:07 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-07 C Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor JAKug/L 2300056EPA 8015 05/05/2023< 400 1Diesel range organics 400J Surrogate: o-Terphenyl Limit 60-14083.0 %JAK 230005605/05/20231 MW-18RStation ID:Date / Time Sampled: Lab Number: 04/04/23 14:25 Matrix:WaterComment: 2304004Workorder 2304004-08 C Parameter UnitsResults Qual- ifier Report Limit Analyzed BatchMethodBy Dilution Factor Diesel range organics 400 JAKug/L 2300056EPA 8015 05/05/20238051J Surrogate: o-Terphenyl Limit 60-14082.8 %JAK 230005605/05/20231 Note: "J" Qualifier indicates an estimated value. Page 13 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Result Reporting Limit Units Spike Level Source Result %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Analyte Quality Control - Inorganic Chemistry Parameters Batch 2300038 - Default Prep GenChem Method Blank (2300038-BLK1)Prepared & Analyzed: 04/10/23 Alkalinity mg/L5.00< 5.00 Duplicate (2300038-DUP4)Prepared: 04/10/23 Analyzed: 04/11/23 Source: 2304004-05 Alkalinity mg/L25.0 200.279430429 Reference (2300038-SRM1)Prepared & Analyzed: 04/10/23 Alkalinity mg/L5.00 86.4 85-11599.986.3 Batch 2300096 - Filter thru 0.45 Method Blank (2300096-BLK1)Prepared & Analyzed: 05/01/23 Sulfate as SO4 mg/L3.00< 3.00 Method Blank Spike (2300096-BS1)Prepared & Analyzed: 05/01/23 Sulfate as SO4 mg/L3.00 60.0 90-11010261.4 Duplicate (2300096-DUP3)Prepared: 05/01/23 Analyzed: 05/02/23 Source: 2304004-07 Sulfate as SO4 mg/L3.00 200.150131131 Matrix Spike (2300096-MS3)Prepared: 05/01/23 Analyzed: 05/02/23 Source: 2304004-07 Sulfate as SO4 mg/L3.00 60.0 80-12081.0179131 Matrix Spike Dup (2300096-MSD3)Prepared: 05/01/23 Analyzed: 05/02/23 Source: 2304004-07 Sulfate as SO4 mg/L3.00 60.0 2080-12081.2 0.0665180131 Reference (2300096-SRM1)Prepared & Analyzed: 05/01/23 Sulfate as SO4 mg/L3.00 100 80-120102102 Page 14 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Result Reporting Limit Units Spike Level Source Result %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Analyte Quality Control - EDB and DBCP by EPA Method 8011 Batch 2300048 - Default Prep GC-Semi Method Blank (2300048-BLK1)Prepared: 04/17/23 Analyzed: 04/18/23 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L0.010< 0.010 1,2-Dibromoethane "0.010< 0.010 Method Blank (2300048-BLK2)Prepared: 04/17/23 Analyzed: 04/18/23 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L0.010< 0.010 1,2-Dibromoethane "0.010< 0.010 Method Blank Spike (2300048-BS1)Prepared: 04/17/23 Analyzed: 04/18/23 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L0.010 0.100 70-1301150.115 1,2-Dibromoethane "0.010 0.100 70-1301100.110 Method Blank Spike (2300048-BS2)Prepared: 04/17/23 Analyzed: 04/18/23 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L0.010 0.100 70-1301120.112 1,2-Dibromoethane "0.010 0.100 70-1301100.110 Matrix Spike (2300048-MS4)Prepared: 04/17/23 Analyzed: 04/19/23 Source: 2304004-07 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L0.010 0.100 70-13097.00.097 < 0.010 1,2-Dibromoethane "0.010 0.100 70-1301030.103 < 0.010 Matrix Spike Dup (2300048-MSD4)Prepared: 04/17/23 Analyzed: 04/19/23 Source: 2304004-07 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L0.010 0.100 2570-13095.0 2.080.095 < 0.010 1,2-Dibromoethane "0.010 0.100 2570-130102 0.9760.102 < 0.010 Trip Blank (2304004-11)Prepared: 04/17/23 Analyzed: 04/19/23 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L0.010< 0.010 1,2-Dibromoethane "0.010< 0.010 Holding Blank (2304004-12)Prepared: 04/17/23 Analyzed: 04/19/23 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L0.010< 0.010 1,2-Dibromoethane "0.010< 0.010 Page 15 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Result Reporting Limit Units Spike Level Source Result %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Analyte Quality Control - TVPH/BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene by GC/MS Batch 2300042 - EPA 5030B-R8 Method Blank (2300042-BLK1)Prepared: 04/13/23 Analyzed: 04/14/23 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/L1.0< 1.0 1,2-Dichloroethane "1.0< 1.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene "1.0< 1.0 Benzene "1.0< 1.0 Ethyl Benzene "1.0< 1.0 m,p-Xylene "2.0< 2.0 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether "1.0< 1.0 Naphthalene "1.0< 1.0 o-Xylene "1.0< 1.0 Toluene "1.0< 1.0 TPH as Gasoline "100< 100 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10010.0 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 99.49.94 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 10010.0 Method Blank (2300042-BLK2)Prepared: 04/13/23 Analyzed: 04/14/23 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/L1.0< 1.0 1,2-Dichloroethane "1.0< 1.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene "1.0< 1.0 Benzene "1.0< 1.0 Ethyl Benzene "1.0< 1.0 m,p-Xylene "2.0< 2.0 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether "1.0< 1.0 Naphthalene "1.0< 1.0 o-Xylene "1.0< 1.0 Toluene "1.0< 1.0 TPH as Gasoline "100< 100 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10110.1 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 10110.1 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 10010.0 Page 16 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Result Reporting Limit Units Spike Level Source Result %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Analyte Quality Control - TVPH/BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene by GC/MS Batch 2300042 - EPA 5030B-R8 Method Blank Spike (2300042-BS1)Prepared: 04/13/23 Analyzed: 04/14/23 TPH as Gasoline ug/L100 800 70-13073.4587 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.39.93 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 95.49.54 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.39.93 Method Blank Spike (2300042-BS2)Prepared: 04/13/23 Analyzed: 04/14/23 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/L1.0 20.0 70-13095.819.2 1,2-Dichloroethane "1.0 20.0 70-13080.616.1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene "1.0 20.0 70-13094.618.9 Benzene "1.0 20.0 70-13096.519.3 Ethyl Benzene "1.0 20.0 70-13096.619.3 m,p-Xylene "2.0 40.0 70-13097.338.9 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether "1.0 20.0 70-13010420.8 Naphthalene "1.0 20.0 70-13088.617.7 o-Xylene "1.0 20.0 70-13096.019.2 Toluene "1.0 20.0 70-13095.019.0 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10010.0 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 97.39.73 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 10010.0 Method Blank Spike (2300042-BS3)Prepared: 04/13/23 Analyzed: 04/15/23 TPH as Gasoline ug/L100 800 70-13072.0576 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10110.1 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 97.69.76 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 98.89.88 Method Blank Spike (2300042-BS4)Prepared: 04/13/23 Analyzed: 04/15/23 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/L1.0 20.0 70-13096.219.2 1,2-Dichloroethane "1.0 20.0 70-13090.918.2 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene "1.0 20.0 70-13095.719.1 Benzene "1.0 20.0 70-13099.219.8 Ethyl Benzene "1.0 20.0 70-13098.219.6 m,p-Xylene "2.0 40.0 70-13098.639.4 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether "1.0 20.0 70-13010521.0 Naphthalene "1.0 20.0 70-13095.619.1 o-Xylene "1.0 20.0 70-13097.219.4 Toluene "1.0 20.0 70-13097.419.5 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10210.2 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 10010.0 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.19.91 Page 17 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Result Reporting Limit Units Spike Level Source Result %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Analyte Quality Control - TVPH/BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene by GC/MS Batch 2300042 - EPA 5030B-R8 Matrix Spike (2300042-MS1)Prepared: 04/13/23 Analyzed: 04/14/23 Source: 2304004-07 TPH as Gasoline ug/L100 800 70-13082.8662< 100 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.79.97 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 96.79.67 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.49.94 Matrix Spike (2300042-MS2)Prepared: 04/13/23 Analyzed: 04/14/23 Source: 2304004-07 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/L1.0 20.0 70-13010521.4 0.3 1,2-Dichloroethane "1.0 20.0 70-13093.218.6 < 1.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene "1.0 20.0 70-13010621.1 < 1.0 Benzene "1.0 20.0 70-13010721.5 < 1.0 Ethyl Benzene "1.0 20.0 70-13010721.5 < 1.0 m,p-Xylene "2.0 40.0 70-13010742.8 < 2.0 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether "1.0 20.0 70-13011022.0 < 1.0 Naphthalene "1.0 20.0 70-13089.417.9 < 1.0 o-Xylene "1.0 20.0 70-13010320.6 < 1.0 Toluene "1.0 20.0 70-13010821.6 < 1.0 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.69.96 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 10010.0 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 10110.1 Matrix Spike Dup (2300042-MSD1)Prepared: 04/13/23 Analyzed: 04/14/23 Source: 2304004-07 TPH as Gasoline ug/L100 800 2570-13083.4 0.775667< 100 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10410.4 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 97.99.79 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.99.99 Matrix Spike Dup (2300042-MSD2)Prepared: 04/13/23 Analyzed: 04/14/23 Source: 2304004-07 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/L1.0 20.0 2570-130107 2.1321.8 0.3 1,2-Dichloroethane "1.0 20.0 2570-13093.7 0.58918.7 < 1.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene "1.0 20.0 2570-130108 2.2521.6 < 1.0 Benzene "1.0 20.0 2570-130110 2.5322.0 < 1.0 Ethyl Benzene "1.0 20.0 2570-130111 2.9422.1 < 1.0 m,p-Xylene "2.0 40.0 2570-130110 2.9744.1 < 2.0 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether "1.0 20.0 2570-130109 0.86921.8 < 1.0 Naphthalene "1.0 20.0 2570-13094.4 5.4418.9 < 1.0 o-Xylene "1.0 20.0 2570-130107 3.6721.3 < 1.0 Toluene "1.0 20.0 2570-130109 0.36921.7 < 1.0 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.59.95 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 97.69.76 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.89.98 Page 18 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Result Reporting Limit Units Spike Level Source Result %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Analyte Quality Control - TVPH/BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene by GC/MS Batch 2300042 - EPA 5030B-R8 Trip Blank (2304004-11)Prepared: 04/13/23 Analyzed: 04/14/23 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/L1.0< 1.0 1,2-Dichloroethane "1.0< 1.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene "1.0< 1.0 Benzene "1.0< 1.0 Ethyl Benzene "1.0< 1.0 m,p-Xylene "2.0< 2.0 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether "1.0< 1.0 Naphthalene "1.0< 1.0 o-Xylene "1.0< 1.0 Toluene "1.0< 1.0 TPH as Gasoline "100< 100 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.69.86 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 99.79.97 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.29.92 Holding Blank (2304004-12)Prepared: 04/13/23 Analyzed: 04/14/23 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/L1.0< 1.0 1,2-Dichloroethane "1.0< 1.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene "1.0< 1.0 Benzene "1.0< 1.0 Ethyl Benzene "1.0< 1.0 m,p-Xylene "2.0< 2.0 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether "1.0< 1.0 Naphthalene "1.0< 1.0 o-Xylene "1.0< 1.0 Toluene "1.0< 1.0 TPH as Gasoline "100< 100 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.89.88 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 10010.0 "10.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 10110.1 Page 19 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Result Reporting Limit Units Spike Level Source Result %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Analyte Quality Control - Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by 8015 DRO Batch 2300056 - EPA 3520C Method Blank (2300056-BLK1)Prepared: 04/24/23 Analyzed: 05/04/23 Diesel range organics ug/L400< 400 "100 60-140Surrogate: o-Terphenyl 90.890.8 Method Blank (2300056-BLK2)Prepared: 04/25/23 Analyzed: 05/04/23 Diesel range organics ug/L400< 400 "100 60-140Surrogate: o-Terphenyl 86.086.0 Method Blank (2300056-BLK3)Prepared: 04/26/23 Analyzed: 05/05/23 Diesel range organics ug/L400< 400 "100 60-140Surrogate: o-Terphenyl 79.579.5 Method Blank Spike (2300056-BS1)Prepared: 04/24/23 Analyzed: 05/04/23 Diesel range organics ug/L400 2000 60-12087.61750 "100 60-140Surrogate: o-Terphenyl 90.590.5 Method Blank Spike (2300056-BS2)Prepared: 04/25/23 Analyzed: 05/04/23 Diesel range organics ug/L400 2000 60-12082.01640 "100 60-140Surrogate: o-Terphenyl 84.384.3 Method Blank Spike (2300056-BS3)Prepared: 04/26/23 Analyzed: 05/05/23 Diesel range organics ug/L400 2000 60-12078.61570 "100 60-140Surrogate: o-Terphenyl 84.684.6 Matrix Spike (2300056-MS4)Prepared: 04/26/23 Analyzed: 05/05/23 Source: 2304004-07 Diesel range organics ug/L400 2000 60-12088.41770< 400 "100 60-140Surrogate: o-Terphenyl 84.384.3 Matrix Spike Dup (2300056-MSD4)Prepared: 04/26/23 Analyzed: 05/05/23 Source: 2304004-07 Diesel range organics ug/L400 2000 2560-12088.4 0.05091770< 400 "100 60-140Surrogate: o-Terphenyl 80.880.8 NOTE: %REC is percent recovery, Result (less sample contribution) divided by the Spike Level RPD is the Relative Percent Difference (difference between the Result and the Source Result) divided by their average Page 20 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Page 21 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Page 22 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Page 23 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Appendix A - Exceptions Report Lab Number Sample Name Analysis Analyte Name Explanation 2304004-01 BTEX/Gasoline by 8260 Continuing calibration criteria not met - low MW-1 TPH as Gasoline 2304004-01 Diesel-Low-R8 Analyzed outside of holding time. MW-1 *ALL* 2304004-02 BTEX/Gasoline by 8260 Continuing calibration criteria not met - low MW-14 TPH as Gasoline 2304004-02 Diesel-Low-R8 Analyzed outside of holding time. MW-14 *ALL* 2304004-03 BTEX/Gasoline by 8260 Continuing calibration criteria not met - low MW-5 TPH as Gasoline 2304004-03 Diesel-Low-R8 Analyzed outside of holding time. MW-5 *ALL* 2304004-04 BTEX/Gasoline by 8260 Continuing calibration criteria not met - low MW-13 TPH as Gasoline 2304004-04 Diesel-Low-R8 Analyzed outside of holding time. MW-13 *ALL* 2304004-05 BTEX/Gasoline by 8260 Continuing calibration criteria not met - low MW-13 DUP TPH as Gasoline 2304004-05 Diesel-Low-R8 Analyzed outside of holding time. MW-13 DUP *ALL* 2304004-06 BTEX/Gasoline by 8260 Continuing calibration criteria not met - low MW-6 TPH as Gasoline 2304004-06 Diesel-Low-R8 Analyzed outside of holding time. MW-6 *ALL* 2304004-07 BTEX/Gasoline by 8260 Continuing calibration criteria not met - low MW-19 TPH as Gasoline 2304004-07 Diesel-Low-R8 Analyzed outside of holding time. MW-19 *ALL* 2304004-08 BTEX/Gasoline by 8260 Continuing calibration criteria not met - low MW-18R TPH as Gasoline 2304004-08 Diesel-Low-R8 Analyzed outside of holding time. MW-18R *ALL* 2304004-11 BTEX/Gasoline by 8260 Continuing calibration criteria not met - low Trip Blank TPH as Gasoline 2304004-12 BTEX/Gasoline by 8260 Continuing calibration criteria not met - low Holding Blank TPH as Gasoline Page 24 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Appendix B - Samples and Analysis Method Name Analysis # Samples Work Order # Lab SOP 300.0 Anions by IC23040048 EPA 300.0 INORM-006v11_Anions _Aquion Alkalinity - R823040048 EPA 310.1 INORM-302v21_Alk BTEX/Gasoline by 826023040048 8260/8015 ORGM-007v16_ BTEX8260 Diesel-Low-R823040048 EPA 8015 ORGM-508v17_Diesel EDB-R823040048 EPA 8011 ORGM-505v18_EDB-D BCP Page 25 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453 Certificate of AnalysisProject: Rod Harrison LSR No: 2304004 Appendix C - Data Assessment Guidelines QC Check Flagging Criteria Initial Calibration (ICAL) If the calibration fails, then all failing analytes for all samples are qualified as estimated. This should be rare because samples are usually re-run if the calibration fails. Initial Calibration Verification (ICV) or Standard Reference Material (SRM) High failure: All detections for failing analytes for all samples are qualified as estimated. Low failure: All failing analytes for all samples are qualified as estimated. Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) The CCV sometimes fails "High" or "Low". If this happens, all detections for failing analytes for all associated samples are qualified as estimated. A high-failure means the instrument got more sensitive since the caibration, and a low-failure means it lost sensitivity. Continuing Calibration Blank (CCB) All detections for failing analytes for all associated samples where the concentration in the blank is greater than 1/10 the amount measured in the sample OR if the blank contamination otherwise affects the sample results are qualified as estimated. Blanks (BLK) Preparation Blank, Method, Trip, Storage, etc. All detections for failing analytes for all samples where the concentration in the blank is greater than 1/10 the amount measured in the sample OR, if the blank contamination otherwise affects the sample results are qualified as estimated. Lab Control Sample (LCS) or Standard Reference Material (SRM) or Blank Spike (BS) High failure: All detections for failing analytes for all associated samples are qualified as estimated. Low failure: All failing analytes for all associated samples are qualified as estimated. Matrix Spike (MS) High failure: All detections for failing analytes in the parent sample are qualified as estimated. Low failure: All failing analytes in the parent sample are qualified as estimated. No qualification if the native concentration is greater than or equal to 4x the spike concentration. Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) %R Failure: Same as matrix spike. RPD Failure: All failing analytes in the parent sample are qualified as estimated. Duplicate Sample (DUP) If two duplicates don't meet acceptance critera then all failing analytes in the parent sample are qualified as estimated. No qualification is used if the native concentration is less than the RL. Serial Dilution (SD) In the serial dilution, if there are problems, then all failing analytes in the parent sample are qualified as estimated. This could happen due to matrix effects. No qualification if native concentration is less than or equal to 50x the RL. Detection Limit Standard (CRA) or (CRL) High failure: All detections for failing analytes less than or equal to 5x the concentration in the CRL for all associated samples are qualified as estimated. Low failure: All failing analytes less than or equal to 5x the RL for all associated samples are qualified as estimated. Internal Standard (IS) Where an internal standard is used, the analytes associated with the failing internal standard (IS) are qualified as estimated. One use of an internal standard is to measure extraction efficiency. If the extractions recovery is outside of criteria, then the final result is qualified. Surrogate Spike (SURR) High failure: All detections for all analytes associated with the failing surrogate are qualified as estimated. Low failure: All analytes associated with the failing surrogate are qualified as estimated. If obvious chromatographic interference with the surrogate is present, qualification may not be necessary and will be based on the professional judgment of the analyst. Dissolved > Total If the dissolved metal concentration is greater than the total metal concentration then both are qualified as estimated. Note: The J Qualifier is used to indicate an estimated value. (This table was last edited on 2/8/2023) Page 26 of 26 11-Jul-2023Date Generated:2304004 FINAL 07 11 23 1453