DAQ-2025-000143

DAQC-018-25
Site ID 10335 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING COMPANY

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: January 8, 2025

SUBJECT: Location: 474 West 900 North, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
Contact: Rheannon Schaefer – 801-367-8102
Tester: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Sources: Crude Unit Furnace H-101 and Ultraformer Unit (UFU) Furnace F-1
FRS ID #: UT0000004903500004
AO# DAQE-AN0103350075-18 dated January 11, 2018
Subject: Review of Pretest Protocol dated January 2, 2025

On January 2, 2025, the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a protocol for testing of the Tesoro
Refining and Marketing Company’s Crude Unit Furnace H-101 and UFU Furnace F-1 located in Salt
Lake City, Utah. Testing will be performed on February 17 and 18, 2025, to determine compliance with
the emission limits found in AO Condition II.B.1.g, II.B.3.a, and II.B.7.a.

PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:

1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses: OK
2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate: OK
3. RM 3A used to determine dry molecular weight of the gas stream: OK
4. RM 4 used to determine moisture content: OK
5. RM 7E used to determine NOx emissions: OK

DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted.

CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: Send protocol review and test date confirmation notice.

ATTACHMENTS: Stack testing protocol.

6 3
m\E ry!/.
January 2,2025
Mr. Robert Leishman
Division of Air Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144820
salt Lake ciry, uT 84114
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company's
Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU Regen/WGS/COBB RATA Protocol
UT'U F-l tr'urnace NOX/N2C H-101 Heater NOx
Dear Mr. Leishman:
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, UT 84103-1494
Tesoro Refining &Marketing Company LLC
A subsidiary of Marathon Patroleum Corporation
[\o."'J P"livtrtJ
I,TAH DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL OUAJTY
JAN 2 ZaZS
DIII:S|ON OF AIR QUEUTi
HAND DELIVERED
Performance Test Protocol
Enclosed please find the Protocols for the primary and redundant sets of Wet Gas
Scrubber (WGS) CO,O2 NOx and SO2 analyzers Relative Accuracy Test Audits
(RATA), the Ultraformer Unit (UFU) F.l Furnace Nitrogen Oxides Performance Test
and Crude Unit (N2C) Heater Nitrogen Oxides Performance Test scheduled for the week
of February 17fr,2025. Please also find enclosed the Protocol for the Relative Accuracy
Test Audits (RATA) for the primary and redundant sets of FCCU Regen CO, Oz and COz
analyzers and the primary set of Carbon Monoxide Boiler Bypass (COBB) CO, 02, Nox
and SO2 analyzers scheduled for the week of February 24fi,2025.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
'ffiH"$5'4,1il'il,fli,
'i'-rt..
A l6rcd;
.*oN oF ArR QUALrrr
TECHNICAL GRCUI-J
Site Specific Test Plan
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
salt Lake city, uT 84103
Sources to be Tested: Ultraformer F-l Unit Furnace &
Crude Unit Furnace H-101
Proposed Test Dates: February 17 & 18,2025
Proj ect No. AST-2025 -0362-001
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Strite E
West Valley City, Uf 84120
pd/l6rrce
TECI] NICAL GROUP Sile Specific Test Plan
Test Program Summary
Regulatory Information
Permit No.
Source Information
DAQE-AN1033s007s-18
Source Name
Crude Unit Fumace H-101
Ultraformer Unit (UFII) Furnace
F-t
Contect Informetion
Source ID
PS#I
PS#2
Target Parameter
NOx
NOx
Test Location
Tesoro Refrning and Marketing Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Facility Contact
Rheannon Schaefer
Rschaefer@marathonpetroleum. com
[phone]
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley Ciry, L-rT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Alan Jensen
alan j ensar@alliancetg. com
[phone]
(subject to change)
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie. shonk@al I i m6gfg.sern
(812) 4s2478s
Test Plan/Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
delaine.span [e-mail]
AST-2025-0362-001 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page i
pul6rrpE)
T E C I]N IC A L G R O U P
Site Specific Test Plan
Table ofContents
TABLE OFCONTENTS
2.0 Summary of Test Program .................2-l
2.2 Process/Contol System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded...... ...........2-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide........ ............ 3-l
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E-Nitrogen Oxides ............3-1
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 - Mass Emission Factors ....................... 3-1
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification. ........................3-1
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Contol - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A and 7E................................3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedu1e................... ......2-l
LIST OF APPENDICES
AppendixA MethodlData
Appendix B Example Field Data Sheets
AST-2025-0362-001 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page ii
pilr6rpe
TECIINICAL GRCUP Site Specifc Test Plan
Introduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) to conduct
compliance testing at the Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company (Tesoro) Salt Lake City, Utah refinery. Portions
of the facility are subject to provisions of the Utah Departrrant of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality
(UDAQ) Permit No. DAQE-AN103350075-18. Testing will be conducted to determine the emission rates of
nitogen oxides (NOx) at the exhausts of the Crude Unit Fumace H-l0l and the UFU Furnace F-I.
The data obtained for the UFU Fumace F-l will be used to determine the correct emission factor for the NOx Cap
calculation per the annual requirement detailed in the permit as well as compliance with the 3-hour average NOx
0.065 lbA,IMBtu limit detailed in the Tesoro Consent Decree lodged July 18, 2016. The data obtained for the Crude
Unit Fumace H-l0l will be used to determine the correct emission factor for the NOx Cap calculation per the annual
requirement NOx 0.054 lbA{MBtu limit detailed in the perrrit.
This site-specific test plan (SSTP) has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of the
UDAQ permit.
1.1 Facility Descriptions
The Ultafonner Unit (lFlI) Fumace is fred using plant gas and employs ultra-low NOx bumers to contol NOx
emissions. The UFU stack is tested once every calendar year to determine the correct emission factor for
compliance.
The Crude Unit Furnace H-101 is equipped with ulra-low NOx burners and emissions are exhausted tbrough one
stack designated as PS#I. The ma"rimum fred heat capacity is no greater than 174 MMBtu/k GlfD based on a l-
hour average.
1,2 Project Team
Personnel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table l-1: Project Team
13 Safety Requirements
Testing personnel will undergo site-specific safety faining for all applicable areasi upon arrival at the site. Alliance
personnel will have current OSHA or MSHA safety taining and be equipped with hard hats, safety glasses with side
shields, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fire resistant clothing, and fall protection (including shock
corded lanyards and full-body hamesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves in a manner consistent with
Client and Alliance's safety policies.
A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader.
Tesoro Personnel Rheannon Schaefer
Regulatory Agency rrDAQ
Allience Personnel Alan Jensen
other field personnel assigned at time of testing event
A5T-2025-0352-001 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 1-l
)l | . ' ri Site Specific Test Plan
Summary ofTest Progrdms
2,0 Summary of Test Program
To satisfu the requirements of the UDAQ permit, the facility will conduct a perfbrmance test program to determine
the compliance status of the Crude Unit Furnace H-lOl and the UFU Fumace F-I.
2.1 General Description
All testing will be performed in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A,
'lE and 19. Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program. The following is
a summary of the test objectives.
o Testing will be performed to demonstrate compliance with the UDAQ Permit.
o Emissions testing will be conducted on the exhaust of the Crude Unit Furnace H-l0l and the UFU Furnace
F-1.
. Each of the three (3) test runs will be approximately 60 minutes in duration.
o Performance testing will be conducted to determine the correct emission factor for the NOx Cap
calculation.
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded
Plant personnel will collect operational and parametric data at least once every l5 minutes during the testing. The
following list identifies the measurements, observations and records that will be collected during the testing
program:
. Operating Load
o Fuel Analysis
o Fuel Use
2.3 Proposed Test Schedule
Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program.
Table 2-l: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule
Tectlng Locadon Parameter US EPA Method No. of
Runs
Run
Duretion
Est Oncite
Time
DAY I -February 17,2025
UFU Fumace F-l
OzlCOz 3A
3 60 min
8hrNOx7E
Mass Emission Factors l9
DAY2-February 18,2025
Crude Unit Furnace
H-l0l
OzlCOz 3A
3 60 min
8hrNOx,78
Mass Emission Factors t9
AST-2025-0362-00 I Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page2-l
Site Specific Test Plan
Summary of Test Plograrns
2.4 Emission Limits
Emission limits for each pollutant are below.
Teble 2-2: Emission Limits
2.5 Test Report
The final test report must be submitted within 60 days of the completion of the performance test and will include the
fo llowing inforrnation.
o Introduction -Brjef discussion of project scope of work and activities.
o Results and Discussion - A summary of test results and process/control system operational data with
comparison to regulatory requirements or vendor guaxantees along with a description of process conditions
and/or testing deviations that may have affected the testing results.
o Methodologt - A description of the sampling and analytical methodologies.
o Sample Calcalations - Example calculations for each target pararneter.
t Field Data - Copies of actual handwritten or electonic field data sheets.
o Laboratory Data - Copies of laboratory report(s) and chain of custody(s).
o Quality Control Data - Copies of all instnrment calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates.
o Process Operating/Control System Data- Process operating and contol system data (as provided by MPC)
to support the test results.
NOx - 0.065 lb/TvIMBtu (3-hour
Crude Unit Fumace H-lOl
AST-2025-0362-001 Tcsoro - SaIt Lake City, UT Pa;ge2-2
AI
_- ,t l.l I
F
TA Site Specific Test Plan
Testing Methodologt
3.0 Testing Methodology
This section provides a description of the sampling and analytical procedures for each test method that will be
employed during the test program. AII equipment, procedures and quality assurance measures necessary for the
completion of the test program meet or exceed the specifications of each relevant test method. The emission testing
program will be conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology
All stack diameters, depths, widths, upstream and downstream disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be
measured on site with an EPA Method I verification measurement provided by the Field Team Leader. These
measurements will be included in the test report.
3.f U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3,A - Orygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (Oz) and carbon dioxide (CO) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3A. Data will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist
of a stainless steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an rrnheated
Teflon sample line is used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section
3.5.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides
The nitrogen oxides (NO*) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 78. Data"
will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist of a stainless steel
probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system
will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line is
used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system drectly after the probe. Otherwise, a
heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.5.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 - Mass Emission Factors
The pollutant concentrations will be converted to mass emission factors (lbA,IMBtu) using procedures outlined in
U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19. The calculated fuel factor (F-Factor) will be used in the calculations based on
the fuel gas analysis.
3,4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification
A calibration gas dilution system field check will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method
205. An initial three (3) point calibration will be conducted, using individual Protocol I gases, on the analyzer used
Peremeter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remerks
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Instnrmental Analysis
Nitrogen Oxides 7E Instumental Analysis
Mass Emission Factors l9 Fuel Factors / Heat Inputs
Gas Dilution System Certification 205
AST-2025-0362-00t Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT
pul6lpEr
Site Specific Test Plan
Testing MethodologlrECI]NICAL GROUP
to complete the dilution system field check. Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates will be utilized to force
the dilution system to perfomr two dilutions on each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases will be sent
directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response will be recorded in an electronic field data sheet. A mid-level
supply gas, with a cylinder concentration within l0% of one of the gas divider settings described above, will be
introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The
cylinder concentration and the analyzer response must agree within ZYo. T\ese steps will be repeated three (3)
times. The average analyzer response must agree within 2o/o of the predicted gas concentration. No single injection
shall differ more than 2o/o from the average instrument response for that dilution.
3.5 Quality Assurence/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A and 7E
Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol I (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates
will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report.
Low Level gas will be introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concenhation and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will be recorded. This process will be
repeated for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration gases will be
sequentially inroduced directly to the analyzer. The Calibration Error for each gas must be within 2.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmvi% absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be intoduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppm/%o (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration will be recorded. The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value, and this value
will be recorded. Next, Low-Level gas will be introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer readi.g
to decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppmlYo (whichever was less restrictive) will be recorded. If the Low-
Level gas is zero gas, the acceptable response must be 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration or 0.5 ppm/%
(whichever was less reskictive). The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value, and this value
will be recorded. The measurement system response time and initial system bias will be determined from these data.
The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concarfration) will be introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response is stable, the value will be recorded. Next, Low-Level gas will be introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value will be recorded once it reaches a stable response. The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0
percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference or the data is invalidated, and the Calibration
Error Test and System Bias must be repeated.
The Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias must [g within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/Yo
absolute difference or the Calibration Error Test and System Bias must be repeated.
To determine the number of sarnpling points, a gas statification check will be conducted prior to initiating testing.
The pollutant concentations will be measured at twelve [averse points (as described in Method l) or three points
(16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each traverse point will be sarnpled for a minimum of trvice
the system response time.
If the pollutant concentration at each taverse point do not differ more than 5Yo or 0.5 ppmlD.3% (whichever is less
restrictive) of the average pollutant concentation, then single point sampling will be conducted during the test runs.
AST-2025-0352-001 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page3-2
putdrpe
Site Specifc Test Plan
Testing MethodologtTECIJNICAL GROUP
If the pollutant concentation does not meet these specifications but differs less than lOoh or 1.0 pprn/0.5% from the
average concenhation, then three (3) point sarnpling will be conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diarneter - 16.7,
50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter - 0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters
from the stack wall). If the pollutant concentation differs by more than l0% or 1.0 ppm/0.5% from the average
concentation, than sampling will be conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) haverse points. Copies of statification
check data will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Contol Appendix of the report.
An NOz - NO converter check will be perforrred on the analyzer prior to initiating testing or at the completion of
testing. An approximately 50 ppm nitrogan dioxide cylinder gas will be inhoduced directly to the NOx analyzer and
the instrument response will be recorded in an electronic data sheet. The instnrment response must be within +/- l0
percent of the cylinder concentation.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup will be used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data will be continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At
the completion of testing, the data will also be saved to the Alliance server. All data will be reviewed by the Field
Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data will be
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review will be performed by the Project Manager.
AST-2025-0362-00 I Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 3-3
pul6rpe
TECIlI.JICAL GBOUP Site Specifrc Test Plan
Auailty Assurance Propram
4.0 Quality Assurance Program
Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality Contol Management Plan to ensure the
continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and
procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme.
Adherence to prescribed procedures is quite often the most applicable QC check.
4.1 Equipment
Field test equipment is assigned a unique, permanent identification number. Prior to mobilizing for the test
program, equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipment problems prior to arriving on site. This
minimizes lost time on the job site due to equipment failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is
unavoidable despite the most rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures. Therefore, replacements for critical
equipment or components are brought to the job site. Equipment retuming from the field is inspected before it is
retumed to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and
recalibrated where necessary.
Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. The
calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA-600/R-94/038c, September 1994) are utilized.
When these methods are inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recognized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked
for completeness and accuracy. Copies of calibration forrns are included in the report.
The following sections elaborate on the calibration procedures followed by Alliance for these items of equipment.
o Dry Gas Meter and Orifice. A full meter calibration using critical orifices as the calibration standard is
conducted at least semi-annu3[ly, more frequently if required. The meter calibration procedure determines
the meter correction factor (Y) and the meter's orifice pressure differential (AH@). Alliance uses approved
Alternative Method 009 as a post-test calibration check to ensure that the correction factor has not changed
more than 5% since the last full meter calibration. This check is performed after each test series.
r Pitot Tubes and Manometers. Type-S pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria required by U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.84 unless a specific coeflicient has been
determined from a wind tunnel calibration. If a specific coeflicient from a wind tunnel calibration has been
obtained that coeffrcient will be used in lieu of 0.84. Standard pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria
required by U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coeffrcient of 0.99. Any pitot tubes not
meeting the appropriate geometric criteria are discarded and replaced. Manometers are verified to be level
and zeroed prior to each test run and do not require firrther calibration.
. Temperatue Measuring Devices. All thermocouple sensors mounted in Dry Gas Meter Consoles are
calibrated semi-annually with a MST-taceable thermocouple calibrator (temperature simulator) and
verified during field use using a second MST-taceable meter. NlST-fraceable thermocouple calibrators
are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory.
o Nozzles. Nozzles are measured three (3) times prior to initiating sampling with a caliper. The maximum
difference between any two (2) dimensions is 0.004 in.
o Dieital Calipers. Calipers are calibrated annually by Alliance by using gage blocks that are calibrated
annually by an outside laboratory.
AST-2025-0362-001 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 4- I
TECIII'.JICAL GNOUP Site Specific Test Plan
Auafi ty As surance Pro gr am
Barometer. The barometric pressure is obtained from a nationally recognized agency or a calibrated
barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field trip against a m€rcury barometer. The
barometer is acceptable if the values agree within + 2 percent absolute. Barometers not meeting this
requirement are adjusted or taken out ofservice.
Balances and Weights. Balances are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory. A functional check is
conducted on the balance each day it is use in the field using a calibration weight. Weighs are re-certified
every two (2) years by an outside laboratory or internally. If conducted internally, they are weighed on a
MST taceable balance. If the weight does not meet the expected criteria, they are replaced.
Other Equipment. A mass flow conholler calibration is conducted on each Environics system annually
following the procedures in the Manufacturer's Operation manual. A methane/ethane peneEation factor
check is conducted on the total hydrocarbon analyzers equipped with non-methane cutters every six (6)
months following the procedures in 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ. Other equipment such as probes, umbilical
lines, cold boxes, etc. are routinely maintained and inspected to ensure that they are in good working order.
They are repaired or replaced as needed.
4.2 Field Sampling
Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test
method(s). General QC measures for the test program include:
o Cleaned glassware and sample hain components will be sealed until assembly.
o Sample fiains will be leak checked before and after each test run.
o Appropriate probe, filter and impinger temperatures will be maintained.
r The sampling port will be sealed to prevent air from leaking from the port.
Dry gas meter, AP, AH, temperature and pump vacuum data will be recorded during each sample point.
An isokinetic sampling rate of 90-110% will be maintained, as applicable.
All raw data will be maintained in organized manner.
All raw data will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability.
a
a
a
a
AST-2025-0362-001 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 4-2
N.6rrtp-SOURCE TESTING
Itrrdo! T{rc R.Oillt . Sdt IrL. Clty R.tr!.ry
Method 1 Data
SomG lrltrrloBcr Udt F!n.c F-l
Ihct Orlalt do!: V6tiel
^ar-3r,.ffiDLtuc. froo Fr wdl to odrldc of Port, --JIJ6-I
Nbplr lrSti: 9.25 h
D.pti of lhct: 52.25 h
crcr s.cdo!.t ara orora, TIild
otrt *"e,---lll-t
IlLhlc. A Ihct Dlu.G[: tl (Errt b. > 0.t
D'lrtM. B: 31.0 ttDLtrlc.BDldllhEctn: 7J (Eortb.>2)
Mhllu Nub.r otTnEm Pobtr 12
THEUlADUL'I
Thvrm '/t of
Dhoct r
Irltt nc Dlrhlcc
froD
oltddc ofPol!i nlt
I
I
1
5
5
1
tI
l0
lt
t2
t6.7
50.0
'1',
t.73
26.t3
13:2
17.9t
35.38
5x:7
'Percent oIstack <lumetcr ftom rnsde *all to traverse potnt
LOCATION OF STRATIFIC TION FOINTS
Numl.r of tave poift on a dbfrdo
I
2
3
1
5
5
1I,
l0il
l2
,l567r9l0lll23
1.1 - '.214.6 - 10.529.6 - 19.,t
10.1 - )2.3
85.4 -- 67.795.6 - t0.6
89.5
_--r-a-,
--:
11.6 - 6.7
t5.4 -- 25.0
75.0
-- :: ':.'
2.6
t.2
14.6
22.6
34.2
65.E
71.4
t5.4
9l.t
e1:4
2.t
6.1
I 1.8
t1.1
25.0
35.6
61.1
75.0
t2.3
88.2
93.3
97.9
SekDi.8ro
A = 3E.5 ft.
B=31ft-
D.pth ofDuct = 52.25 iL
Crcs SetioEl As
[rowntt]aam
Illsturbeno
t Fctnrm
Dl5turbrnca
A/tfuSOURCE TESTING
Locrdo! fmru Rc0rht - Srlt Lrl.c Ctty Rctrlcry
Method 1 Data
Sotm Cnd. Udt Ftnra E-l0l
Dtci OrLlt don! Vdicd
ooao"agr,--Effi-
Dlrtu.G fton Frr W.tI to OctrldG of Port, -1i65-U
NbDlc laStl: 4.00 h
D.pti orDqct 96.50 l!
Crcr S.cdolrl Ara of DGL 50.79 ft'
No. ofT€t Port: 2
ot r.o..A,---ill-ft
Irlrmcc A DlGt IXEcm, ---i3-1rrfr b. > 0O
Dt t a."B,---i6i--ft
Dlrt rcc B D[ct DhEdrn: 2.5 (E!rt bc > 2)
arnrrrl.an nt,r I
E*b-
-E-b
LOCATION OT STRATItrICATION FOINTS
Ntfrb.r ol tard. poinb on a dlad.r
I
2
3
1
5
6
7
I
)
t0
ll
t2
,r1357[9101112
4.1
t4.6
29.6
70.1
85.4
95.6
14.6
E5.4
6.7
25.0
75.0'l_' _
3.2
10.5
19.4
32.3
67.7
t0.6
E9.5
':' ..
7.6
8.2
14.6
22.6
31.2
65.8
71.4
t5.4
9r.t
97.4
- 2.1
- 6.7
- ll.8
- 11.7
- 25.0
- 35.6
- 9.4
- 75.O_ t2.3_ 88.2
- 93.3
- 97.9
'Percent ofsrack dometet_liofr tnelc ball b nowrse poht
Tnw
Polnt
'A olI)lE.t r
DlrtrG uuucctoD
oltddc otrrtl
t
3
1
5
6
1
t
I
l0
lt
t2
16.1
50.0
t1'
16.12
48.25
':'
20.t2
52.25
t4.3t
StutDi.g@
A= 15ft.
B=20ft
Dcpth ofDuct = 96.5 ir
Cros Sdionrl Aru
Upstrurm
Dlgturbanc.
QA Data
Location -- - --
Source --
Project No. -
Parameter Or - Outlet COu - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Operating Range
Cylinder ID
Znro
Low
Mid
Hioh
NA
r1
NA
Y
NA
Y
Cylinder Certifed Values
7*ro
Low
Mid
High
NA
r1
NA
Y
NA
NA
Cylinder Expiration Date
Znro
Low
Mid
Hiph
NA
r1
NA
r1
NA
Y
Calibration Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Dete: --
Peremeter Or - Outlet COr - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Exnected Average Concentretion
Span Between
Low
IIigh
Desired Soen
Low Range Gas
Low
Hiph
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
Iligh Renge Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (Yo or ppm)
Znro
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
Y
0.00
NA
0.00
NA
Response Time (seconds)
Upscale Calibration Gas (Cs,)
lnstrument Response (% or ppm)
Znro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA NA NA
Performence (7o of Span or Cel. Gas Conc.)
Znro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA NA NA
Performence Criteria
Znro
Low
Mid
Hiph
2.00
NA
2.00
2.OO
2.00
NA
2.00
2.00
2.00
NA
2.00
2.00
Znro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA NA NA
Bias/Drift Determinations
Locetion: -- - --
ProJect No.: -
Source: --
Perlmeter Or - Outlet CO: - Outlet NOr - Outlet
Run I Dete
Span Value
Initial tnstrument Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Swlm Ilnscale Resnonse
#N/A #N/A #N/A
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Snan
Drift(%)
Z.ero
Mid
Run 2 Dete
Span Value
lnstrument Zero Cal Response
lnstrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Resoonse
fN/A #N/A #N/A
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
Drift(%)
Trro
Mid
Run 3 Date
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
lnstrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Unscale Resoonse
#N/A #N/A #N/A
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Postlest Snan
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
Emissions Celculations
Location -- - --
Source --
Project No. -
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Averase
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
Source Data
Source Loa4 %
Fuel Factor (O2 drv). dscf/lv{MBtu
EL
Fd
Celculeted Deta - Outlet
Oz Coocentratiot, Yo dry co,
COz Concentration, % dry Cco.
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Emission Factor, lbA,IMBtu (O2d)
CNo,
EFNo' oza
Runl-RMData
Lmdon: -----
Sourca: -
Prolcct No.: j:
Iht!-
Tlm
udt
Shtur
Or - Oudct
'habyvdid
Col-Oudct N(X-OuU.t
%dr! mEvdVrlid Vdid
UrcorretcdRuAvcryc (C1)
Cd Ger Conmtrdon (Cyr)
Prct rt Syrt o Z.ro Rapom
Pottcat SyrtaE ZGro RdpoErc
Av6|tcz.roR ryolt.(Co)
Prctaat SyrtaE Cd Rlapolrc
Portt rt Syrt tn Cd Rcrpouc
Avcrqc Cd Rcporrc (Ca)
Locction: -- - -
Project No.: --
NOr Converter Check - Outlet
Analyzer Meke
Analyzer Model
Serid Number
Cylinder ID Number
Cyltnder Erp. Dete
Cvlinder Concentrrtion. Dnm
PreTest Date Time
PreTest Eftrciencv. 7o
Post-Test Date Time
Post-Test Concentretlon, ppm
Post-Test Efliclencv. 7o
*Required Eficienq is > 90 %.
Location: -- - --
Source: --
Project No.: -
Dete:
Treverse Point Time NOx
(onm)
o2
(V"l
Coz
(o/"\
A-l
1
3
4
5
6
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
B-l
2
3
4
5
6
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
Averase
Criteris Met Sinele Point Sinele Point Sinsle Point
FUEL FACTOR CALCTJLATION BASED ON FUEL AI\ALYSIS
COMPONEM MW MOLE%MOLES C MOLES II MOLES O MOLES N MOLES S
TIYDROGEI\2.0t6
HELIUM 4.003
METHANI 16.043
WATER t 8.015
CARBONMONOKDE 28.010
NITROGE\28.013
ETI{YLENI 28.054
ET}IANI 30.070
OXYGEN 31.999
HYDROGEN SULFIDE 34.076
ARGON 39.948
PROPYLEM 42.081
CARBONDIO)(IDE 44.010
PROPANE 44.097
BUTTLENES 56.08
ISO-BI'TANE 58. 24
N-BUTANE 58. 24
PENTENES 70.35
ISO.PENTANE 72.5l
N-PENTANE 72 5l
BENZENE 78 l4
HEXANE 86. 78
TOLUENE 92 4t
TIEPTANE 100.205
ETI{YLBENZENE 106. I 68
XYLENE 1 06.1 68
TOTAI.
WEIGIIT (LBS]
WEIGHT%
LEVGTU/SCFI:= SUM [ (MOLE%, . LHV ) + 100 ]: SUM [ (MOLE%, o HHV ) + 100 ]: SUM [ (MOLE Yoi . DENSITY ) + 100 ]: DENSrry (LB/SCF) = DENSrryern p.0763 LB/SCF)
= HlfV -:- DENSITY
= SUM [ (MOLE%, . MWt) + 100 ]
:106 . [(3.64o%H) + (1.53.%C) + (0.14c/slt!) + (0.57'%3) -(0.46o%O)]+ GCV
= 106, [ (5.57 o%H) + (1.53.%C) + (0.14 o%N) + (0.57.%S) - (0.46.%O) ] + GCV
:106 . (0.321 c%C) + GCV
:0.209oFa+Fc
HIIV GTU/SCD:
DENSITYGB/SCD:
SPECIFIC GRAVTIY:
GCVOTU/LB):
MW GBILBMOLE):
F6 @SCF/1!IMBT[r):
F- (WSCF/IIIMBTID:
F.(SCF/1}IMBTU):
Erpected Foi
Location: -- - --
Source: --
Project No.: --
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 3A
Or - Outlet Concentretion (CsJ, 'h dry
co,: (cou.-co)* ( aa"*e" "J
: average analyzer value during test,Yo dryCo... : average of pretest & posuest zero responses,o/o dryC""A: actual concentration of calibration gas,Yo dry
cM
co,
average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, o/o dry: Oz Concentation,Yodry
where,
Locstion: -- - --
Source: --
Project No.: -
Run No. /l}Iethod Run I / Method 3A
COr - Outlet Concentration (C6sJ, o/o dry
wherg
cco: (cou-co)* ( ffi.)
#N/A
Cob.
co
Clrt,c'
cM
Cco
: average anallzer value during test"% dry: average ofpretest & posttest zero responses,%o dry: actual concentration ofcalibration gas,Yo dry: average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, oZ dry: COz Concentattot,Yo dry
Location: -- - --
Source: --
Project No.: --
Run No. /]}lethod Run I / Method 7E
NOx - Outlet Concentretion (CxoJ, ppmvd
cNo*: (co6._ce)x (dh;I)
where,
average analyzer value during test, ppmvd: average ofpretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd: actual concentation of calibration gas, ppmvd: average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd: NOx Concentation, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Emission Factor (EFxo,qJ,lb/lVIMBtu
Cou,
co
Crra.l
cM
Cwo*
where,
EFNo*oa =
CNo*
K
Fd
Co"
EFNo*ol
ERNo*xKxFd. (-"rJ9+;-J
NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
Lt9482E-07 : constant, lb/dscf ' ppmvd: fuel factor, dscflMMBtu: oxygen concentration, o/o
: lb/MMBtu
AIrfuTECF[NJ;[iA_L cnouP
Sourcc: -
Prolcct No.: -Drt.
Analyza Matc:
Analyza Modcl:
Aaalpa SN:
Environics ID:
CmponcnVBalmcc Gas:
Cylindr Gm ID (Dilution):
Cylindo Gr Coucentration (Dilution), %:
Cyliada Gu ID (Mid-kvel):
Cylinda Gu Concmtration (Mid-trvcl), %:
AvGrrg.
Aldper
Cotrccnbrdon
InJccdon I
Enor
( +2u.\
InJedon 2
Enor
( t 2.ar
Inledon 3
Eror
( + 7./.r
I'TAH DEPARTMENT OF
EiWIRONMENTAL OTJAUTY
I ') nnnrr;ri,r L lNlX
DMISION OF AIR QUALTT'
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF
EI'{VIRONMENTAL OUALITY
/l[ll
;r'soN
TECHNICAL GROUF
Site Specific Test Plan
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake ciry, uT 84103
Source to be Tested: Wet Gas Scrubber
Proposed Test Dates: February 19 &20,2025
Proj ect No. AST -2025 -03 62-002
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group,
3683 W 2270 S, Sui
West Valley City,
2 2C25
OF AIR QUALITi
AlrfuTECHNICAL GROUP Sile Specific Test Plan
Test Program Summary
Resulatorr Informetion
Pennit No.
Regulatory Citations
Source Informetion
UDAQ Permit No. DAQE-AN I 03350075-1 8
40 CFR 60, Appendix B, PS 2, 3,ari,d.4l4A
Source Narne
Wet Gas Scrubber
Contact Information
Target Parameters
Oz, SOz, NOx, CO, VFR
Test Location
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Facility Contact
Rheannon Schaefer
Rschaefer@marathonpeholeum. com
[phone]
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 22705, Suit€ E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
charles.horton@alliancetg. com
(3s2) 663-7568
Field Team Leader
Alan Jensen
alan j ensen@alliancetg. com
(847)22U3949
(subject to change)
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie. [e-mail]
(812) 4s2478s
Test Plan/Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
delaine.spangler@alliancetg. com
AST-2025-0362-002 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page i
A/tfu Site Specific Test Plan
Table of ContentsTECIINICAL GROUP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.0 Summary of Test Program .,...............2-l
2.2 Process/Contol System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded..,... ...........2-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate........3-l
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide ........ ............3-2
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content........ .....3-2
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 6C - Sulfur Dioxide........ .......3-2
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitogen Oxides ............3-2
3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l0 - Carbon Monoxide.... ......3-2
3.7 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification. ........................ 3-3
3.8 Quality Assurance/Quality Connol - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A, 6C, 7E and 10................... 3-3
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-l: Prograrn Outline and Tentative Test Schedu1e................... ......2-2
Table 2-2: Relative Accuracy Requirements and Limits ... ........................2-2
LIST OF APPEIYDICES
AppendixA MethodlData
Appendix B Example Field Data Sheets
Appendix C Sarnple Train Diagrams
AST-2025-0362-002 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page ii
,dltfu Site Specific Test Plan
IntroductionTECIINICAL GROUP
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Marathon Petoleum Corporation (IvPC) to conduct
perforrnance specification (PS) testing at the Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company (Tesoro) Salt Lake City,
Utah refinery. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, PS 2, 3, and 4/4A and
the Utah Departnent of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (tlDAQ) Permit No. DAQE-
AN103350075-18. Testing will include conducting a relative accuracy test audit (RATA) to determine the relative
accuracy (RA) of the oxygen (Oz), sulfur dioxide (SOz), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO) primary
and back-up continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) and volumetric flow rate (VFR) continuous
emissions rate monitoring system (CERMS) serving the Wet Gas Scrubber.
This site-specific test plan (SSTP) has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of the
UDAQ permit.
1.1 CEMS Descriptions
Wet Gas Scrubber
Parameter:
Make:
Model:
Serial No.:
Span:
Parameter:
Make:
Model:
Serial No.:
Span:
Pollutant
OzlNOx-CEMS I
CAI
700
1908029
O-lO %o Oz
0-200 ppmvd NOx
Pollutant
Oz / NOx - CEMS 2
CAI
700
1908030
0-10 Yo Oz
0-200 ppmvd NOx
Pollutant
SOz- CEMS I
Teledyne
TIOOH
429
0-200 ppmvd SOz
Pollutant
SOz - CEMS 2
Teledyne
TIOOH
428
0-200 ppmvd SOz
Pollutant
CO_CEMS I
Horiba
VIA-sIO
NP7X7084
0-1,000 ppmvd
Pollutant
CO - CEMS 2
Horiba
VIA.5IO
UGTUOOOB
0-1,000 ppmvd
Flow Rate
VFR
Rosemount
3 05 I CD I AO2 AI ANISBZH2DZ
2862407
NA
Flow Rate
VFR
Rosemount
3 05 I CD I AO2AI ANI'BZH2DZ
2862407
NA
1.2 Project Team
Personnel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-1: ProjectTeam
13 Safety Requirements
Testing penonnel will undergo site-specific safety fraining for all applicable areas upon arival at the site. Alliance
personnel will have current OSHA or MSHA safety taining and be equipped with hard hats, safety glasses with side
shields, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fire resistant clothing, and fall protection (including shock
MPC Personnel Rheannon Schaefer
Reguletory Agency UDAQ
Alliance Personnel Alan Jsnsen
other field personnel assigned at time of testing event
AST-2025-0362-002 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page l-l
Ailfu Site Specifu Test Plan
IntroductionTECI.{NIGAL GROUP
corded lanyards and full-body hamesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves in a manner consistent with
Client and Alliance's safety policies.
A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader.
AST-2025-0362-m2 Tcgoro - Salt takc City, UT Pagc l-2
A/tfuTECHNICAL GROUP Site Specific Test Plan
Summary of Test Prosrams
2.0 Summery of Test Program
To satisff the requirements of the LIDAQ permit, the facility will conduct performance specification testing to
determine the compliance status of the Wet Gas Scrubber.
2.1 Generel Description
All testing will be perfomred in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods l, 2,
3A,4,6C,7E, and 10. Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program. The
following is a summary of the test objectives.
Testing will be performed to demonstate compliance with the UDAQ pennit and 40 CFR 60, Appendix B,
PS 2,3, 4/4A,and6.
Emissions testing will be conducted on the exhaust of Wet Gas Scrubber.
Testing will be conducted while the source is operating at greater than 50% of the maximum normal load.
Each of the 9-12 test runs will be approximately 2l-minutes.
Flow and moisture measurements will be conducted concurrently with the RATA testing on the Wet Gas
Scrubber to determine lb/hr calculations.
2.2 Process/Control System Paremeters to be Monltored and Recorded
Plant personnel will collect operational and parametric data at least once every 15 minutes during the testing. The
following list identifies the measurements, observations and records that will be collected during the testing
program:
r CEMS Data
23 Proposed Test Schedule
Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program.
a
a
a
a
AST-2025-0362-002 Tesoro - Salt Lrke City, UT Page 2-l
AIrfuTICI1NlCAL GNCL] N Site Specific Test Plan
Summary ofTest Programs
Table 2-1: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule
2.4 Emission Limits
Emission limits for each pollutant are below.
Table 2-2: Relative Accuracy Requirements and Limits
Tccttng Locedon Penmeter USEPAMethod No. ofRunr Run Iluredon Ect Onslte
Ilme
DAY I -February 19,2025
Equipment Setup & Pretest QA/QC Checks
l0 hrwGs
Primary Analyzers
VFR r&2
9-12 2l min
Oz 3A
BWS 4
SOz 6C
NOx 7E
CO t0
DAY2-February20,2025
WGS
Redundant
Analyzers
VFR t&2
9-12 2l min l0 hr
Oz 3A
BWS 4
SOz 6C
NOx 7E
CO 10
Source CEMS Requlred Reladve
Accurecv Applicable Standerd / Ltmtt Citrffon
Wet Gas
Scrubber
Oz- o/ovd <20 % (RM) or ldl<l %PS3
SO2- ppmvd, ppmvd
@.0oAO,-lblhr
<20 Yo (RM) or <10 Yo
(AS)
18 ppmvd @O%Oz(7-daV)
l0 ppmvd @0%OzB65-dav)PS2
NOx - ppmvd, ppmvd
@.0o/o O,-lb/hr
<zOYo (RM) or <l0%o
(AS)
20 ppmvd @ 0% Oz(7-daV)
l0 ppmvd @0%Oz965-day)PS2
CO- ppmvd, ppmvd @
0Yo Ot <l0 o (RM) or 55 % (AS)500 ppmvd @0%Oz(7-day)
100 ppmvd @ 0% Oz965-day)PS 4/4A
VFR - dscfm <20Yo NA PS6
AST-2025-0362-002 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page2-2
2.5 Test Report
The final test repod must be submitted within 60 days of 16e esmpletion of the performance test and will include the
following inforrration.
o Introduction -Bief discussion of project scope of work and activities.
Results and Discassion - A summary of test results and process/control system operational data with
comparison to regulatory requirements or vendor guarantees along with a description of process conditions
and/or testing deviations that may have affected the testing results.
Methodologt - A description of ttre sampling and analytical methodologies.
Sample Calculations - Example calculations for each target parameter.
Field Data - Copies of actual handwritten or electronic field data sheets.
Quality Control Data - Copies of all instrument calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates.
Process Operating/Control System Data - Process operating and control system data (as provided by MPC)
to support the test results.
a
a
a
a
a
AST-2025-0362-002 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 2-3
A/tfuIfClill ICAL LlllC'L.r F
Site Specific Test Plan
Testing Methodologt
3.0 Testing Methodology
This section provides a description of the sampling and analyical procedues for each test metlod that will be
employed during the test program. All equipment, procedures and quality assurance measures necessary for the
completion of the test progrilm meet or exceed the specifications of each relevant test method. The emission testing
program will be conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3- l .
Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodology
All stack diameters, depths, widths, upstream and downstream disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be
measrued on site with an EPA Method I verification measurement provided by the Field Team Leader. These
measwements will be included in the test report.
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points will be selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances will be equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure l-1 (for isokinetic sampling) and/or
Figure l-2 (measuring velocity alone) in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l.
Full velocity traverses will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system will consist of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature will be measured with a K-
type thermocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings will be recorded during each test run. The data collected will
be utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
Stack gas velocity pressru€ and temperature readings will be recorded during each test run. The data collected will
be utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate for comparison to the continuous emission rate monitoring system
(CERMS). The relative accuracy of the CERMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60,
Performance Specification 6.
AST-2025-0362-002 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 3-l
Peremeter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remerks
Volumetric Flow Rate t&2 Full Velocity Traverses
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Instumental Analysis
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Sulflu Dioxide 6C Instrumental Analysis
Nitrogen Oxides 7E Instrumental Analysis
Carbon Monoxide t0 Instrumental Analysis
Gas Dilution System Certification 205
Altfu Site Specific Test Plan
Testing MethodologyTEC[INICAL GROUP
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (O) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3A. Data will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist
of a stainless steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sample line is used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section
3.8.
The relative accuracy of the Oz and COz CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60,
Performance Specification 3.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content will be determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train will consist of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger will be filled with a
known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger will be analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run
on the same analytical balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 6C - Sulfur Dioxide
The sulfur dioxide (SOz) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 6C. Data
will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist of a heated stainless
steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified analyzer. The gas conditioning system
will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the source gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line is
used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a
heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.8.
The relative accuracy of the SOz CEMS will be detennined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Performance
Specification 2.
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides
The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E. Data
will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist of a stainless steel
probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system
will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line is
used then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a
heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality contol measures are described in Section 3.8.
The relative accuracy of the NOx CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Performance
Specification 2.
3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l0 - Carbon Monoxide
The carbon monoxide (CO) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10.
Data will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist of a stainless
steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system, and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning
system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line is
AST-2025-0362-002 Tesoro - Salt I:ke City, UT Page3-2
A/tfu Site Specific Test Plan
Testing MethodologtT E C II N I C A L G R O U P
used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a
heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality contol measures are described in Section 3.8.
The relative accuracy of the CO CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Performance
Specification 4 or 4A.
3.7 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification
A calibration gas dilution system field check will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method
205. An initial three (3) point calibration will be conducted, using individual Protocol I gases, on the analyzer used
to complete the dilution system f,reld check. Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates will be utilized to force
the dilution system to perform nvo dilutions on each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases will be sent
directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response will be recorded in an electronic field data sheet. A mid-level
supply gas, with a cylinder concentration within l0%o of one of the gas divider settings described above, will be
intoduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electonic field data sheet. The
cylinder concentration and the analyzer response must agree within 2Yo. Tlrese steps will be repeated three (3)
times. The average analyzer response must agree within ZYo of the predicted gas concentation. No single injection
shall differ more than 2Yo from the average instrument response for that dilution.
3.8 Quality Assurance/Quelity Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A, 6C, 7E and 10
Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol I (+/- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates
will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Contol Appendix of the report.
Low Level gas will be inhoduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low Level gas
concenfration and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will be recorded. This process will be
repeated for the High Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases will be
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. The Calibration Error for each gas must be within 2.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmvl%o absolute difference.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concenffation) will be inEoduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppm/% (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentation will be recorded. The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value, and this value
will be recorded. Next, Low Level gas will be introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading
to decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppnr/% (whichever was less restrictive) will be recorded. If the Low
Level gas is zero gas, the acceptable response must be 5.0 percent of the upscale gzrs concenhation or 0.5 ppm/%
(whichever was less reskictive). The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value and this value
will be recorded. The measurement system response time and initial system bias will be determined from these data.
The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute differance.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentation) will be intoduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response is stable, the value will be recorded. Next, Low Level gas will be intoduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value will be recorded once it reaches a stable response. The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0
percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference or the data is invalidated and the Calibration
Error Test and System Bias must be repeated.
AST-2025-0362-002 Tesoro - Salt L^ake City, LJ"I Page 3-3
Altfu Site Specifrc Test Plan
Testins MethodolopvTECIINICAL GROUP
The thift between pre- and post-run System Bias must be within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/%
absolute difference or the Calibration Error Test and System Bias must be repeated.
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas statification check will be conducted prior to initiating testing.
The pollutant concentrations will be measured at twelve traverse points (as described in Method l) or three points
(16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement [ine). Each haverse point will be sampled for a minimum of twice
the system response time.
If the pollutant concentration at each traverse point do not differ more than 5o/o or 0.5 ppmlD.3% (whichever is less
restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling will be conducted during the test runs.
If the pollutant concentration does not meet these specifications but differs less than lo%o or 1.0 ppml0.5% from the
average concentration, then three (3) point sarnpling will be conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - 16.7,
50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter- 0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters
from the stack wall). If the pollutant concentration differs by more than l0% or 1.0 ppm/0.5% from the average
concentration, then sampling will be conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse points. Copies of stratification
check data will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report.
An NOz - NO converter check will be perfonned on the analyzer prior to initiating testing or at the completion of
testing. An approximately 50 ppm nitrogen dioxide cylinder gas will be introduced directly to the NOx analyzer and
the instrument response will be recorded in an electonic data sheet. The ins0rrment response must be within +/- l0
percent of the cylinder concentation.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup will be used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data will be continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel fomrat on the hard drive of a computer. At
the completion of testing, the data will also be saved to the Alliance server. All data will be reviewed by the Field
Tearn Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electonic data will be
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review will be performed by the Project Manager.
AST-2025-0362-002 Tesoro - Salt Lakc City, UT Page 3-4
A/rfu Site Specifrc Test Plan
Quality Assurance ProgramTEC[INICAL GROUP
4.0 Quality Assurence Program
Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality Contol Management Plan to ensure the
continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and
procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme.
Adherence to prescribed procedures is quite often the most applicable QC check.
4.1 Equipment
Field test equipment is assigned a unique, permanent identifrcation number. Prior to mobilizing for the test
program, equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipmant problems prior to aniving on site. This
minimizes lost time on the job site due to equipment failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is
unavoidable despite the most rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures. Therefore, replacements for critical
equipment or components are brought to the job site. Equipment returning from the field is inspected before it is
rehrmed to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and
recalibrated where necessary.
Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. The
calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA-600/R-94/038c, September 1994) are utilized.
When these methods are inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American Society 1e1 Js5ting and
Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recognized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked
for completeness and accwacy. Copies of calibration forms are included in the report.
The following sections elaborate on the calibration procedures followed by Alliance for these items of equipment.
o Drv Gas Meter and Orifice. A full meter calibration using critical orifices as the calibration standard is
conducted at least semi-annually, more frequently if required. The meter calibration procedure detennines
the meter correction factor (Y) and the meter's orifice pressure differential (AH@). Alliance uses approved
Alternative Method 009 as a post-test calibration check to ensure that the correction factor has not changed
more than 5% since the last full meter calibration. This check is performed after each test series.
. Pitot Tubes and Manometers. Type-S pitot tubes that meet the geomekic criteria required by U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.84 unless a specific coeffrcient has been
determined from a wind tunnel calibration. If a specific coefficient from a wind tunnel calibration has been
obtained that coeflicient will be used in lieu of 0.84. Standaxd pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria
required by U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 are assigred a coeffrcient of 0.99. Any pitot tubes not
meeting the appropriate geometric criteria are discarded and replaced. Manometers are verified to be level
and zeroed prior to each test run and do not require firrther calibration.
. Temperature Measurinq Devices. All thermocouple sensors mounted in Dry Gas Meter Consoles are
calibrated semi-annually with a MST-traceable thermocouple calibrator (temperature simulator) and
verified during field use using a second MST-traceable meter. NlST-traceable thermocouple calibrators
are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory.
. Nozzles. Nozzles are measured three (3) times prior to initiating sampling with a caliper. The maximum
difference between any two (2) dimensions is 0.0M in.
o Dieital Calipers. Calipers are calibrated annually by Alliance by using gage blocks that are calibrated
annually by an outside laboratory.
AST-2025-0362-002 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 4-l
Alfu
TECF.I NICAL GROUP Site Specifc Test Plan
Quality A s suranc e Pro gr am
Barometer. The barometric pressure is obtained from a nationally recognized agency or a calibrated
barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field tip against a mercury barometer. The
barometer is acceptable if the values agree within a 2 percent absolute. Barometers not meeting this
requirement are adjusted or taken out ofservice.
Balances and Weiehts. Balances are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory. A functional check is
conducted on the balance each day it is use in the field using a calibration weight. Weights are re-certified
every two (2) years by an outside laboratory or internally. If conducted internally, they are weighed on a
MST traceable balance. If the weight does not meet the expected criteria, they are replaced.
Other Eouipment. A mass flow contoller calibration is conducted on each Environics system annually
following the procedures in the Manufacturer's Operation manual. A methane/ethane penefation factor
check is conducted on the total hydrocarbon analyzers equipped with non-methane cutters every six (6)
months following the procedures in 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ. Other equipment such as probes, umbilical
lines, cold boxes, etc. are routinely maintained and inspected to ensure that they are in good working order.
They are repaired or replaced as needed.
4.2 Field Sampling
Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test
method(s). General QC measures for the test program include:
o Cleaned glassware and sample hain components will be sealed until assembly.
o Sample tains will be leak checked before and after each test run.
o Appropriate probe, filter and impinger temperatures will be maintained.
o The sarnpling port will be sealed to prevent air from leaking from the port.
. Dry gas meter, AP, AH, temperature and pump vacuum data will be recorded during each sarnple point.
o All raw data will be maintained in organized manner.
. All raw data will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability.
AST-2025-0362-002 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 4-2
pull rreTECHNICAL GROUP Method I Data
Do.{ Odddan: Vdi6l
Ihd Ddtn: Cir@lt
Ittt e t n Pr W.tr to OoUar otpo*--liid-t
xppl rrqtt----!fr-n
ocptt ornuct---E6-r"
cB. s.rd.nd Aru or o".tr ---l6li- rt'No.ofTatPorta: 2
N@r of R6@tr !E ro* -----l-
otrcr,--lI6--nihrrrc ^ DoctDErc6,..71m xt oslotrtrcs:-r6;-ftDteBDrdDlffi! 2J (6tb.>2)
MldEuNsDb.rofTrrY.E.Polnt : 125
act!.l Nrb.r otTrr* lobg, 7
L()CATION OF TRAVENSIE POINTS
tlt-ba.lMpolrE a.&-&
I,
3
1
!
6
7
t,
l0lt
l2
t l0
t4.6
t5,4
6.7
25.0
75.0
93.3
4.4
t1.6
29.6
70.4
t5.,1
95.6
32
10.5
19.,{
32.3
67.1
t0.6
89.5
-='
2.6
8.2
1,1.6
22.6
312
65.t
71.1
85.,4
9l.t
91.1
2.t
6.1
I l.t
t1.1
25.0
35.6
61.1
75.0
t2.3tt,
93.3
079
tPcrcal of tlo* diudqlro^ iNid. wll b t@asc point
Tnvm
Potil
U. oI
I'I'EG
IlLt rc.toD
offld. ofrdl
I
2,I
5
6
7tI
t0fl
32
10.5
19.1
32.3
67.1
80.6
89.5
-,
t.01
r0.08
1t.62
I l.0t
61.9
n3e
85.92
92.93
t2.01
19.0t
21.62
40.01
71.99
86.3t
.92
ta:r,
Shck Dirym
A-35fr.
B-20ft.
D@thof Drd- 96ir
CMrSdi@lAM
oooooooo
UFtr..m
Dlrturtanca
AltfuTECHNICAL GROUP Method I Data
S.khffi
lrwi d.ntrtlo!: Vdi6lu*toogo,......ffi-
Irbtre io. Fr w.[ to ouanc or pon -J6fr-uNhEL Lrtth 9.00 h
D.D.icflr!.t 96.00 h
crc.r s.c{o!.I 4re. oro".t---l6li7-d
No. of rot !oa,--l-
NEb.r of Rard!$ D.r Pollt: I
orur*" e, -Ifi--nttt a.G A froct lrlret ., -7--1Dtt u" t os1
Dlttu. B: 20.0 ft
IrLhE B lr!.tDLrt E: 25 (Et b. > 2)
Mhl[uNoibarofTnv6.Pohtt! 16
Actud NEDq of rn"* rom, -----i7-
Tnvcre
Poh 'A olInr*
In.t.e.
t ! h.ld.
ratr
toE.Eldd..f
I
2I
a
5
5
7t,
10il
t2
,2
r0.5
t9.4
323
67.7
t0.6
t9.5
-'
3.01
10.0t
18.62
31.01
61.99
17.18
85.92
92.93
t2.07
19.0t
21.62
,rc.01
73.99
86.38
91j2tr:r,
Ia.tlo. MIC-Totu - S.t I.f. Cfty
ar{x o9{rr > .ar - G. ..)
I'CATION OF TRAVENSE FOINTS
Nubo of Mpohra ot.du&
I,
3
a
5
5
7
I
I
10
1t
l7
14.6
t5.4
6.7
25.0
75.0
,1'
1.1
11.6
29.6
70.1
85.,1
,2
10.5
19.1
12.3
67.1
t0.6
t9.5
-'
2.6
t.2
11.6
22.6
11.7
65.8
71.1
t5.4
9l.t
":
2.t
6.7
I l.E
11.7
25.0
35.6
61.1
?5.0
82J
8t.2
933
91.9
dimu ftoa iuidc wll b nMr. poinl
SteL Di.gre
A-35fr.
B-20ft.
Derh of Du' 96 in
CMrSdi@lAq DogBEaamolrntrta@
ooaaoaoo
Uptlruam
Olrtlrb.m
AltfuTECHNICAL GROUP
02 Summary
Locrdon:
Source:
Project No.:
Confidencc Coeltrcienl CC
cc = lto'=t, sallVn I
where'
to.ezs_[: degtrees of frcedom value
nI= number of runs selected for calculating the RA
sd-= standard deviation of difference
CC = confidence cocfficicnt
Reledve Accurecy, RA
ld l+ lcclRA - ' "x100
where,
d_= averagc difference of Referencc Method and CEMS
CC _= confidence coeffici€nt
RM_= reference method,% dry
RA - _= rclativc accuracy, o/o
Run
No.Drte Time Reference Method
02 Concenfredon
'/" ijrv
CEMS
02 Concen&rdon
t/. ilrr,
Avcrrge
Difference
'/. llrvStrrtEnd
I
2
3
4
{
6
7
8
9
10
tl
t2
Averagr
Standard Dcviation (Sdl
Confi detrce Coeffi cient (CC)
Relrtive Accurecy @A)
Pcrforma[ce Required - Mean Refercnce Mcthod RA < 20%
Performancc Soecifi cation Mcthod PS3
AttfuTECHNICAL GROUP
CO2 Summary
Locrdon:
Source:
ProJect No.:
Run
No.Date Tlme Referencc Method
CO2 Concentredon
'/" ilroy
CEMS
CO2 Concentradon
o/" ilrv
Avenge
Difference
th dryStrrtEnd
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1l
t2
Averagr
Standard Deviation (Sd
Confi dence Coeffi cient (CC
Relrtive Accurrcv (RA
Performance Required - Mean Reference Metho<RA<20o/o
Performance Specifi cation Metho<PS3
Confidence Coeflicient CC
cc=lff"sal
where,
h.czs
n
sd
CC
#N/A
0
- degrees offreedom value
= number of runs selected for calculating the RA: standard deviation ofdifferencc
= confidence coefficient
= average difference of Reference Method and CEMS
= confidence coefficient
- refercnce method, % dry
= relative accuracy, 7o
Relaffve Accuracy, RA
ne = H#x1oo
where,
d
CC
RM
RA
AltfuTECHNICAL GROUP
SO2 Summary
Locrdon:
Source:
Project No.:
Run
No.Dete Tlme Referencc Method
SO2 Concentrrdon
pomvd
CEMS
SO2 Conccnfadon
oomvd
Averrge
Diffcrcnce
nomvdStrrtEnd
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
Average
Standard Deviation (Sd
Applicable Source Standard (ASl
Confidence Coefficient (CC'
Rehdvc Accurrcy (RAl
Performance Required - Mean Reference Method RA< 20%
Pcrformancc Specifi cation Mahoc PS2
Conlidence Coelflclent, CC
cc=lff,.sal
where,
Reledve Accurecy, RA
ne : ffirroo
where,
#N/A
0
h.srs
n
sd
CC
= degrees of Mom value: number of runs selected for calculating the RA: standard deviation ofdifference
= confidence coefficient
= average difference of Reference Mcthod and CEMS
- confidence cocfficicnt
= referetrce method, ppmvd
= relative accuracy, 7o
d
CC
RM
RA
AItfuTECHNICAL GROUP
NOx Summary
Locrdon:
Source:
ProJect No.:
Run
No.Drte Time Reference Mcthod
NOr Concentrrdon
onmvd
CEMS
NOr Concenhedon
nomvd
Averege
Difference
oomvdStrrtEnd
I
,,
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
Averagr
Stsndard Deviation (Sd'
Applicable Source Standard (ASl
Confi dcnce Coeffi cient (CCl
Relcdve Accurecy (RAl
Pcrformance Required - Mean Refcrence Method RA < 20%
Performance Specifi cation Method PS2
Confldence Coelllcient, CC
cc=lff,sal
where,
Rehdve Accur"*, *
ld l+ lcclRA = 7r;;^p xloo
where,
#N/A
o
h.czs
n
sd
cc
: degrees offreedom value
: number ofruns selected for calculating the RA: standard deviation ofdifference: confidence coefficient
d
CC
RM
RA
_= avcrage diffcrence of Refercnce Method and CEMS: confidence coef;Ecient: reference method ppmvd
= relative accuracy, o/o
A/tfuTECHNICAL GROUP
Locrtion:
Source:
Prolect No.:
Run
No.Drte Tlme Reference Method
CO Concentrrdon
oomvd
CEMS
CO ConcenErdon
oomvd
Averrge
Difference
DDEvdStrrlEnd
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
Avcract
Standard Deviation (Sd)
Applicable Source Standard (AS)
Confi dence Coeffi cient (CC'
Rehtive Accurrcy (RA)
Performance Required - Mean Rcference Method RA< l0%
Pcrformance Specifi cation Mettror PS 4A
Conlidencc Coelllclent CC
cc=lff.sal
where,
h.czs
n
sd
CC
#N/A = dcgrces offreedomvalue
0 = n.mbcr of runs selected for calculating the RA
= standard deviation ofdiffcrence
= confidence coefficient
Reledve Accurecy, RA
ld l+ lcclRA = 7riffix1oo
where,
Alternrdve Reledve Accuncy, RA
Rl{ = ldl+ cc
where,
= average diffcrence of Refercncc Method and CEMS
= confidence coefficient: reference method ppmvd
: relative accuracy, oZ
= average difference of Reference Method and CEMS
= confidence coefficient
= relative accuacy, ppm
d
CC
RM
RA
d
CC
RA
YFR Summary
Locrdon:
Source:
Project No.:
Run
No.Drte Time Reference Method
Flow Retc
rclhdrv
CEMS
FIow Rrte
scfh-drv
Averege
Dlfference
sclh-drvStertEnd
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1l
t2
Averace
Standard Deviation (Sd)
Confi dence Coeffi cient (CCl
Rehdve Accurecy (RA)
Acceptability Criteria - Mean Rcference Method <20Yo
Performance Specifrcation Method PS6
Conlldence Coeffrclent CC
cc=lff"sal
where,
Reledve Accurecy, RA
ld l+ lcclRA - ---:----:-----:X 100
where,
h.srs
n
Sd
cc
#N/A
0
: degrees offreedom value
= number of runs selected for calculating the RA
= standard deviation ofdifference
-:
confidence coefficient
d
CC
RM
RA
: average differencc of Reference Method and CEMS: confidence coefficient
= reference method, scfh-dry
= relative acotncy,%o
gltErre
TfCIINICAL GROUP
i'#:::
Project No.:
Vendor ID
Date
EPA Gas
E
QA Data
Psrameter o2 CO,SO,NOx CO
Make
Model
S/N
Operating Renge
Cvlinder Number ID
LOW NA NA NA NA NA
MID
IIIGH
Cvlinder Certified Velues
LOW NA NA NA NA NA
MID
HIGH
LOW NA NA NA NA NA
MII)
HIGH
LOW NA NA NA NA NA
MII)
HIGH
LOW ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO NA
MII)NA
HIGH NA
gltErtre
TECH\ICAL GROUP
Locetion:
Response Time Data
Source:
Project No.:
seconds
Parameter o2 Cor Sor NOx co
Zeto
Low
Mid
Hiph
NA NA NA NA NA
Averege
AItfuTECHNICAL GROUP
Locedon:
Calibration Data
Source:
ProJect No.:
Date:
Pcremeter O2 Cor Soz NOr CO
Exnected Averege Concentration
Span Should be between:
Low
Eigh
Desired Soan
Low Range Ges Should be between
Low
IIish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Renge Gas Should be between
Low
Hish
Iligh Renge Gas Should be between
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentradon (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Htsh
0.00
:l
0.00
..
0.00
Y
0.00
Y
0.00
Y
Resoonse Tlme (seconds)
Uoscale Cdlbradon Gas (C-^)Mid Mid Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero
Low
n[id
Htsh
NA NA NA NA NA
Performence (7o of Span or Celibration
Zeto
Low
Mid
Hloh
Gas)t__l*ot__t__
NA NA NA NA
Lineartty (7o of Span or Cal. Ges Conc.)
7,ero
Low
Mid
Ifish
NA NA NA NA NA
pult6te
TtrCIINI(.)AL GROUP
Runs 1-3 Bias/Drift Determinations
Locedon:
Source:
Project No.:
Dete:
Penmcter Or COr SOr NOx co
Run
Span Value
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response
Initial Instment Upscale Cal Rcsponse
Final Instrument Zqo Cal Response
Final Instrument Upscale Cal Rcsponse
Pretcst System Zcro Rcsponse
Posttcst System Zero Response
Pretest Systern Mid Response
Posttest Svstem Mid ResDonse
Bias or System Performance (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttcst Zero
Pretcst Span
Posttest Soan
Drift(%)
Zcro
Mid
Run
Span Value
lnitid Instrument Zero Cal Responsc
Initial InsEument Upscale Cal Response
Final InstrumentZqo Cal Response
Final lnstrument Upscalc Cal Responsc
Pretcst Systsm Zero Response
Posttcst System Zcro Response
Pretcst Systern Mid Response
Posttest Svstem Mid Resoonse
Bias (%)
Pretcst Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Snan
Drift (%)
Zero
\,Iid
Run
Span Valuc
Initial Instument Zero Cal Response
Initid Instrument Upscale Cal Rcsponse
Final lnstumetrt Zero Cal Response
Final Instument Upscale Cal Respouse
Pretest Systern Zero Response
Posttcst Systcm Zero Response
Pretest System Mid Response
Posttcst Svstem Mid Resoonsc
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttcst Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Snen
Drift(%)
Lero
v{id
Alr6rreTtrCIINICAL GROUP
Run l Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Dete: -
Time
Unit
02 COr SOz NOx CO
o/o dry V" dry ppmvd ppmvd ppmvd
Vslid Velid Velid Valid Velid
Parameter
Uncorrected Run Average (C"uJ
Cal Ges Concentration (Cpj
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Averege Zero Response (Co)
Pretest System Cel Response
Posttest System Cel Response
Average Cel Response (CM)
Corrected Run Average (Corr)
plltErre
TECHNICAL GROUP
EPA Method 205
Field Calibration of Dilution System
Lcldo!:
Somc:
PreJat No.:
Ilrt
Mclhod Crtt rh EPA
Pllsctar 02
Mek
Modc
s/f
Smr
Cvlhd.r Nmb.r III
Zan
Mld
El.h
NA
lvlnder t.e*llbd r
zfro
Mld
0.0
i Ranore a./. or nbm)
zare
Mld
a{lbndoi (:fi S.L.ddn I./. 6f Sbrn)
Mld
Crlbndon Emr P.rfomrR atl. of SEU)
Zare
Mld
, l'/. al
Anrlyzo Mrkc:
Aadlzr Modcl:
Andlza SN:
Eovircdcr ID:
Compon€nt/Bslecc Gu:
Cylida Ga ID (Dilutio!):
Cyliodc Gu Coomtratioa @ilutior), %:
Cylinda Gu ID (Mid-Lacl):
Cylinda Gu Conmaatioo (Mid-Lrvcl), %:
Tutct Mu Flor
Trtct
Dlhdor hrtct Flox Rrtr
Trtct
Comanfrtdon
Actud
Colccltndotr
IDJedo! I
A!dy4r
Coec[rrdo!
I{edo! 2
AnVEr
coftclo'rdo!
hJcdo! I
Alrlyar
Comcltndo!
AYanScAulfer
Corcc[Eldor Irlffcrmc
Avcngc
Emr
90.0 7.O
l0ul0L.80.0 7.0
oI _/5I f,oo 50
IOUsL 50.0 5.0
IOUIL ,on in
oI"/lL lo 0 a0
tNotrUASTEovircnicrUdf!h!rc2-l0LMuRowCostolld. Forthcsuit!thc90'/.@7lpmd80%@7lpmi{etiouwillootbcconductd.
AYGnic
AuDzr
Comcilrrdo!
Ilrccdo! I
Emr
IDJccdoD 2
Emr
Ilrccdo! 3
Emr
AlrAreTECIINICAL GROUP NOx Converter Efficiency Check
Locedon:
Sourcc:
Project No.:
Converter Check
AndyzerMeke
-
Andyzer Model
AnrlyzerSerldNumber
-
Cyttnder ID #
Cyltnder Erp. Dete
l^wllnder C'oncentrrfl on- nnm
Pre-Test Dete _ Ttme
Pre.Tert Concentretlon, ppm
Pre-Test Efflclencv. 7o
Post-Test Dete Tlme
Post-Testcoo""iG-"don,pp.
Post-Test Effl clency. 7o
'Eficienq must be > 90 %
pultfurce
TECH\ICAL GROUP
QA Data
Stratification Check
Locetion: 0
Source: 0
Project No.: 0
Traverse Point Time NOx
(nnm)
CO
(onm)
Sor
(nnm)
o2
(o/"1
Cor
(o/"\
A-l
2
3
4
5
6
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
B-l
2
3
4
5
6
Average
Stetus Sinele Point Sinsle Point Sincle Point Sinsle Point Sinsle Point
AItAtreTtrCIINICAL GROUP
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run/lVIethod:Runl-Method3A
Oxygen Concentrstion (Cs), 7o
coz = (cous-co)x(*4Lr)
where,
Cob.
co
Clrt{
CM
Coz
Cou,
co
C!!{,{
CM
Ccoz
: average analyzer value dr:ring test, o/o vd
: average ofpretest & posttest zero responses, o/o vd
: actual concentation ofcalibration gas,Yovd
: average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, o/o vd: 02 concentration, o/o vd
Cerbon Dioxide Concentration (C6s2), 9/o
cco, = (cous - co) x (#" .J
where,: average enalyer value during test % vd: average ofpretest & posttest zero responses, o/o vd
: actual concentation of calibration gas, %o vd
: average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, o/o vd: CO2 concentration , o/o vd
A/r6trc=TECH\ICAL GROUP
Locetion:
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Source:
Project No.:
Run/Method: Run I - Method 6C
Sulfur Dioxide Concentration (Csoz), ppmvd
csoz = (cous-co)x(6,$r)
where,
Couo
co
cM,{
CM
Csoz
= average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
= average ofpretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd: actual concenEation of calibration gas, ppmvd: average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd: SO2 concentration, ppmvd
Alt6rreTfCIINICAL GROUP
Locetion:
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Source:
Project No.:
Run/l}Iethod: Run I - Method 7E
Nitrogen Orides Concentretion (CxoJ, ppmvd
cxo* = (cous - c^) x /-c"^ \vo''^\(crr-c.))
where,
Cob,l: average malyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co...-: average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
C!,{,{ : actual concentation of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CNo, NOx concentration, ppmvd
pult6'rre
TECH\ICAL GROUP
Locetion:
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Source:
Project No.:
Run/lVlethod: Run I - Method l0
Cerbon Monoxide Concentration (Cse), ppmvd
cco = (cous-co)x(#-)
where,
Coto
co
cM,{
CM
Cco
.;: average analyzer value during test ppmvd
: actual concentation of calibration gas, ppmvd
: average ofpretest & posttest calibration respons€s, ppmvd
: CO concentation, ppmvd
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF
EWIRONMENTAL OUALITV
( ..(lv/.-)
D!".,fISiON OF AIR OUALIT'i
Flow
Regulators
Reference Method Monitors Sampling System
(EPA Methods 3A, 6C, 7E, and 10)
3-Way
Valve
\
Teflon Calibration Line
Heated Teflon
Sample Line
Electronic
Chiller
Manifold Svstem Bypass Flow
-rl il[[il[.'!__]] LL I
trHHfu ]
Stack
il[[ilfl
Exhaust
CT'I OF AII{ CLJALiIAllmre
I li ,I
Site Specific Test Plan
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Sources to be Tested: Regen & COB Bypass
Proposed Test Dates: February 25 &.26,2025
Proj ect No. AST-2025 -037 7
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
A/tfuTECHNICAL GROUP Site Specific Test Plan
Test Program S&mmarv
Regulatory Information
Permit No.
Regulatory Citations
Source Informetion
UDAQ Permit No. DAQE-ANI 03350075- I 8
40 CFR 60, Appendix B, PS 2, 3,and4l4A
Source Name
Regen
COB Bypass
Contact Informetion
Target Parameters
Oz, COz, CO
Oz, SOz, NOx, CO
Test Location
Tesoro Refrning and Marketing Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, uT 84103
Facility Contact
Rheannon Schaefer
Rschaefer@arathonpeholeum. com
(801) 367-8r02
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 22705, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
charles.horton@alliancetg. com
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team LeadEr
Alan Jensen
alan j ensen@alliancetg. com
[phone]
(subject to change)
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie. shonk@alliancetg. com
(8r2) 4s2478s
Test Plan/Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
delaine. spangler@alliancetg. com
AST-2025-0377 Tcsoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page i
A/rfu Site Specifrc Test Plan
Table ofContentsT E C I'I N I C A L G FI O U P
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.0 Summary of Test Program .................2-1
2.2 Process/Contol System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded...... ...........2-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumekic Flow Rate ........ 3-l
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide................... ...................... 3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content........ .....3-2
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 6C - Sulfur Dioxide........ .......3-2
3.5 U.S. EPAReferenceTestMethodTE-NitogenOxides .......-....3-2
3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l0 - Carbon Monoxide.... ......3-2
3.7 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification. ........................ 3-3
3.8 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A, 6C, 7E and l0 ................... 3-3
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-l: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedu1e................... ......2-2
Table 2-2: Relative Accuracy Requirements and Limits... ........................ 2-3
AST-2025-0377 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page ii
Altfu Sile Specific Test Plan
IntroductioaTECI{NICAL GROUP
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Marathon Petoleum Coqporation (MPC) to conduct
performance specification @S) testing at the Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company (Tesoro) Salt Lake City,
Utah refinery. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, PS 2, 3, and, 4l4A and,
the Utah Departnent of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Permit No. DAQE-
AN103350075-18. Testing will include conducting a relative accuracy test audit (RATA) to determine the relative
accuracy @A) of the oxygen (Oz), carbon dioxide (COz), and carbon monoxide (CO) primary and redundant
continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) serving the Regen. Testing will also include conducting a RATA
to determine the RA of the Oz, SOz, NOx and CO on the COB primary and redundant CEMS. Testing will be
conducted on the Regen and COB Bypass concurently.
This site-specific test plan (SSTP) has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of the
UDAQ permit.
1.1 CEMS Descriptions
Regen
Pollutant
Parameter:
Make:
Model:
Serial No.:
Span:
Parameter:
Make:
Model:
Serial No.:
Span:
02lCO2/CO-Primary
Horiba
CMA.467H
EASWCN2
0-s%o2
0-20%coz
0-5%co
Pollutant
Oz/COzlCO- Redundant
Horiba
cMA-467H
xu2F2W0
0-5%Oz
0-20%COz
0-s%co
AST-2025-0377 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, Lff Page l-l
COB Bypass
Pollutant
Parameter: 02 I SO2 / NOx / CO - Primary
Make: Horiba
Model: GI-76ICU
Serial No.: N203PGW
0-25%02
0-200 & 0-1,000 ppmvd SO2
0-200 & 0-1,000 ppmvd NOx
Span: 0-1,000 ppmvd CO
Pollutant
Parameter: Oz / SOz / NOx / CO - Redundant
Make: Horiba
Model: GI-76ICU
Serial No.: Y4WEOJGY
O-25 %o Oz
0-200 & 0-1,000 ppmvd SO2Span: 0-200 & 0-1,000 ppmvd NOx
1.2 Project Teem
Persorurel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-1: Project Team
1.3 Safety Requirements
Testing personnel will undergo site-specific safety training for all applicable areas upon arrival at the site. Alliance
personnel will have current OSHA or MSHA safety taining and be equipped with hard hats, safety glasses with side
shields, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fue resistant clothing, and fall protection (including shock
corded lanyards and full-body harnesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves in a manner consistent with
Client and Alliance's safety policies.
A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader.
AST-2025-0377 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, LJ"t Page l-2
MPC Personnel Meannon Schaefer
Regulatory Agency UDAQ
Alliance Personnel Alan Jensen
other field personnel assigned at time of testing event
AlrfuTECIINICAL GROUP Site Specific Test Plan
Introduction
AltfuTECHNICAL GROUP Site Specific Test Plan
Summam ofTest Proqrans
2.0 Summary of Test Program
To satisfr the requirements of the UDAQ perrnit, the facility will conduct a perforrnance specification testing to
detemrine the RA of the Regen and COB Bypass.
2.1 Generel Description
All testing will be perfomred in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1, 2,
3A,4,6C,7E, and 10. Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program. The
following is a summary of the test objectives.
o Testing will be performed to demonstate compliance with the UDAQ permit and 40 CFR 60, Appendix B,
PS 2,3, and4l4A.
o Emissions testing will be conducted on the exhaust of Regen and COB Bypass.
. Testing will be conducted while each source is operating at greater than 50% of the maximum normal load.
o Each of the 9-12 test runs will be approximately 2l-minutes for the Regen and COB Bypass.
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded
Plant personnel will collect operational and parametric data at least once every 15 minutes duing the testing. The
following list identifies the measurements, observations and records that will be collected during the testing
program:
o CEMS Data
23 Proposed Test Schedule
Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program.
AST-2025-0377 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 2- I
AltfuTECHNICAL GROUP Site Specific Test Plaa
Summary ofTest Progranu
Teble 2-1: Progrem OutJlne and Tentrdve Test Schedule
2.4 Emisslon Limits
Emission limits for each pollutant are below.
DAY I -February 24,2025
Equipment Setup & Pretest QA/QC Checks 6hr
DAY2-February25,2025
Regen - Redundant
Analyzers
VFR t&2
9-12 21 min
l0 hr
OzJCOz 3A
BWS 4
CO 10
COB Bypass -
Redtrndant An"lyrers
Oz 3A
9-12 21 min
SOz 6C
NOx 7E
CO t0
DAY 3 -February 26,2025
Regen-Primary
Analyzers
VFR t&2
9-t2 2l min
l0 hr
OzlCOz 3A
BWS 4
co l0
COB Blpass -
Primary Analyzers
Oz 3A
9-12 2l min
SOz 6C
NO(7E
co l0
DAY 4 - February 27 ,2025
Contingency Day (if needed)
AST-202543?7 Tesoro - Salt hke City, Lm Prgc2-2
pd/tfu
TIilllNlaAL onCLr r Site Specific Test Plan
Summary ofTest Programs
Source CEMS Required Reledve
Accuncv Appliceble Stenderd / Limit Citrtion
Regen
Oz- o/ovd <20Yo (RM) or ldlsl %PS3
COz-Yovd <20Yo (RM) or ldlst X PS3
CO -ppmvd =t0% (RM) orSs % (AS)PS 4/4A
COB
Bypass
Oz-%ovd 520% (RM) or ldl=t Y"PS3
SOz - ppmvd <20oA (RM) or Sl0%
(AS)
l8 ppmvd @ 0o/o Oz(7-day)
10 oomvd @. lYo Ot (365-dav)PS2
NOx - ppmvd <20Yo (RM) or Sl0%
(AS)
20 ppmvd @ O% Oz(7-day)
10 oomvd (dlYoO, (365-dav)PS2
CO - ppmvd sr0% (RM) orss % (AS)500 ppmvd @0%Oz(7-daV)
100 ppmvd @ 0% Oz065-dav)PS 4/4A
Table 2-2: Relative Accuracy Requirements and Limits
2.5 Test Report
The final test report must be submitted within 60 days of the completion of the performance test and will include the
following information.
o Introduction - Bief discussiou of project scope of work and activities.
Results and Discussion - A summary of test results and process/conkol system operational data with
comparison to regulatory requirements or vendor guarantees along with a description of process conditions
and/or testing deviations that may have affected the testing results.
Methodologt - A description of the sampling and analytical methodologies.
Sample Calculations - Example calculations for each target parameter.
Field Data - Copies of actual handwritten or electronic field data sheets.
Laboratory Data - Copies of laboratory report(s) and chain of custody(s).
Quality Control Data - Copies of all instrument calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates.
Process Operating/Control System Data - Process operating and control system data (as provided by MPC)
to support the test results.
a
a
a
a
a
a
AST-2025-0377 Tesoro - Salt Lake Cify, UT Page 2-3
Paremeter US. EPAReference
Test Methods Notcs/Remerkr
Volumetric Flow Rate t&2 Full Velocity Traverses
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Instrumental Analysis
Moishue Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Sulfur Dioxide 6C Instumental Analysis
Nitrogen Oxides ,78 Instrumental Analysis
Carbon Monoxide t0 lnstrumental Analysis
Gas Dilution System Certification 205
A/tfu Sile Specific Test Plan
Testing MethodologtTICiINICAL GNOUF"''
3.0 Testing Methodology
This section provides a description of the sampling and analytical procedures for each test method that will be
employed during the test prograrn. All equipment, procedures and quality itssurance measures necessary for the
completion of the test program meet or exceed the specifications of each relevant test method. The emission testing
progmm will be conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology
All stack diameters, depths, widths, upstream and downsfteam disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be
measured on site with an EPA Method I verification measwement provided by the Field Team Leader. These
measurements will be included in the test report.
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Trayerse Points end Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points will be selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To determine the minimum number of haverse points, the upsheam and downstream
distances will be equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure l-l (for isokinetic sampling) and/or
Figure l-2 (measuring velocity alone) in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l.
Full velocity traverses will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system will consist of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature will be measured with a K-
type thermocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings will be recorded during each test run. The data collected will
be utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Orygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (Oz) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3A. Data will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist
of a stainless steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sample line is used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the
Page 3-lAST-2025-0377 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT
Altfu Site Spectfic Test Plan
Testins Methodolo*TECI{NICAL GROUP
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section
3.8.
The relative accuracy of the Oz and COz CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60,
Performance Specification 3.
33 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content will be determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train will consist of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger will be filled with a
known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger will be analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run
on the same analytical balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 6C - Sulfur Dioxide
The sulfur dioxide (SOz) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 6C. Data
will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist of a heated stainless
steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identifred analyzer. The gas conditioning system
will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the source gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line is
used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system dhectly after the probe. Otherwise, a
heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.8.
The relative accuracy of the SOz CEMS will be detemrined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Performance
Specification 2.
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides
The nikogen oxides (NOx) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E. Data
will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist of a stainless steel
probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system
will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line is
used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a
heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality confrol measures are described in Section 3.8.
The relative accuracy of the NOx CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Performance
Specification 2.
3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10 - Cerbon Monoxide
The carbon monoxide (CO) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10.
Data will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist of a stainless
steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system, and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning
system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line is
used then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a
heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality conftol measwes are described in Section 3.8.
The relative accuracy of the CO CEMS will be determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Performance
Specification 4 or 4A.
AST-2025-0377 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page3-2
Altfu Site Specific Test Plan
Testing MethodolopyT E C I{ N I C A L G R O U P
3.7 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certilication
A calibration gas dilution system field check will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method
205. An initial three (3) point calibration will be conducted using individual Protocol I gases, on the analyzer used
to complete the dilution system field check. Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates will be utilized to force
the dilution system to perform nvo dilutions on each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases will be sent
directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response will be recorded in an electronic field data sheet. A mid-level
supply gas, with a cylinder concentration within l0% of one of the gas divider settings described above, will be
introduced directly to the analyzEr, and the analyzer response recorded in an elechonic field data sheet. The
cylinder concenEation and the analyzer response must agree within 2Yo. T\ese steps will be repeated three (3)
times. The average analyzer response must agree within 2o/o of the predicted gas concentration. No single injection
shall differ more than 2Yofrom the average instnrment response for that dilution.
3.8 Quality Assurance/Quelity Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A, 6C, 7E and l0
Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol | (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates
will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Conffol Appendix of the report.
Low Level gas will be introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low Level gas
concentation and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will be recorded. This process will be
repeated for the High Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases will be
sequentially inffoduced direcfly to the analyzer. The Calibration Error for each gas must be within 2.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmvl%o absolute difference.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppm/oh (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration will be recorded. The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value, and this value
will be recorded. Next, Low Level gas will be introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading
to decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 pprn/% (whichever was less restrictive) will be recorded. If the Low
Level gas is zero gas, the acceptable response must be 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concenhation or 0.5 ppm/%
(whichever was less reskictive). The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value and this value
will be recorded. The measurement system response time and initial system bias will be determined from these data.
The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be intoduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response is stable, the value will be recorded. Next, Low Level gas will be intoduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value will be recorded once it reaches a stable response. The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0
percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference or the data is invalidated and the Calibration
Error Test and System Bias must be repeated.
The Drift betwean pre- and post-run System Bias must be within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/%
absolute difference or the Calibration Error Test and System Bias must be repeated.
To deterrnine the number of sa:npling points, a gas statification check will be conducted prior to initiating testing.
The pollutant concentrations will be measured at twelve taverse points (as described in Method l) or three points
(16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each traverse point will be sampled for a minimum of twice
the system response time.
AST-2025-037?Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 3-3
AItfu Site Specific Test Plan
Testing MethodolopTECI-I NICAL GROUP
If the pollutant concentration at each tav€rse point do not differ more than 5% or 0.5 ppm/0.3% (whichever is less
restrictive) of the average pollutant concenmtion, then single point sampling will be conducted during the test runs.
If the pollutant concentration does not meet these specifications but ditrers less than l0Yo or 1.0 pprn/0.5% from the
average concentration, then ttrree (3) point sampling will be conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - 16.7,
50.0 and 83.3 percant of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter - 0.4, I .0, and 2.0 meters
from the stack wall). If the pollutant concentation differs by more than l0% or 1.0 pprn/0.5% from the average
concentation, then sarpling will be conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) taverse points. Copies of stratification
check data will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Connol Appendix of the report.
An NOz - NO converter check will be performed on the analyzer prior to initiating testing or at the completion of
testing. An approximately 50 ppm nibogen dioxide cylinder gas will be intoduced directly to the NOx analyzer and
the instrument response will be recorded in an electronic data sheet. The instrument response must be within +/- l0
percent of the cylinder concentration.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup will be used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data will be continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At
the completion of testing, the data will also be saved to the Alliance server. All data will be reviewed by the Field
Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data will be
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review will be performed by the Project Manager.
AST-2025-0377 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Page 34
A/tfu
TECIINICAL GROUP Site Specific Test Plan
Quality As surance Pr ogram
4.0 Quality Assurance Progrem
Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Management Plan to ensure the
continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and
procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme.
Adherence to prescribed procedures is quite often the most applicable QC check.
4.1 Equipment
Field test equipment is assigned a unique, permanent identification number. Prior to mobilizing for the test
program, equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipment problems prior to ariving on site. This
minimizes lost time on the job site due to equipmant failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is
unavoidable despite the most rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures. Therefore, replacemenc for critical
equipment or components are brought to the job site. Equipment returning from the field is inspected before it is
retumed to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and
recalibrated where necessary.
Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. The
calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA-600/R-94/038c, September 1994) are utilized.
When these methods are inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recogpized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked
for completeness and accuracy. Copies of calibration forms are included in the report.
The following sections elaborate on the calibration procedures followed by Alliance for these items of equipment.
o Dry Gas Meter and Orifice. A full meter calibration using critical orifices as the calibration standard is
conducted at least semi-annually, more frequently if required. The meter calibration procedure detemrines
the meter correction factor (Y; and the meter's orifice pressure differential (AH@). Alliance uses approved
Altemative Method 009 as a post-test calibration check to ensure that the correction factor has not changed
more than 5% since the last full meter calibration. This check is performed after each test series.
r Pitot Tubes and Manometers. Type-S pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria required by U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.84 unless a specific coefficient has been
determined from a wind tunnel calibration. If a specific coefficient from a wind tunnel calibration has been
obtained that coefficient will be used in lieu of 0.84. Standaxd pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria
required by U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coeffrcient of 0.99. Any pitot tubes not
meeting the appropriate geometic criteria are discarded and replaced. Manometers are verified to be level
and zeroed prior to each test run and do not require further calibration.
o Temperature Measuring Deyices. All thermocouple sensors mounted in Dry Gas Meter Consoles are
calibrated semi-annually with a MST-haceable thermocouple calibrator (temperahre simulator) and
verified during field use using a second MST-traceable meter. NlST-traceable thermocouple calibrators
are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory.
o Nozzles. Nozzles are measured three (3) times prior to initiating sampling with a caliper. The maximum
difference between any two (2) dimensions is 0.004 in.
o Dieital Calipers. Calipers are calibrated annually by Alliance by using gage blocls that are calibrated
annually by an outside laboratory.
AST-2025-0377 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Pagc 4-l
Altfu
T E C I.I N I C A L G F O U P Site Specific Test Plan
Ouality Assurance Program
Barometer. The barometric pressrue is obtained from a nationally recognized agency or a calibrated
barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field tip against a mercury barometer. The
barometer is acceptable if the values agree within * 2 percent absolute. Barometsrs not meeting tlis
requirement are adjusted or taken out ofservice.
Balances and Weights. Balances are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory. A functional check is
conducted on the balance each day it is use in the field using a calibration weight. Weights are re-certified
every two (2) years by an outside laboratory or intemally. If conducted internally, they are weighed on a
MST traceable balance. If the weight does not meet the expected criteria, they are replaced.
Other Equipment. A mass flow contoller calibration is conducted on each Environics system annually
following the procedures in the Manufacturer's Operation manual. A methane/ethane penetration factor
check is conducted on the total hydrocarbon analyzers equipped with non-methane cutters every six (6)
months following the procedures in 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ. Other equipment such as probes, umbilical
lines, cold boxes, etc. are routinely maintained and inspected to ensure that they are in good working order.
They are repaired or replaced as needed.
4.2 Field Sampling
Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test
method(s). General QC measures for the test prograJn include:
o Cleaned glassware and sample hain components will be sealed until assembly.
o Sample trains will be leak checked before and after each test run.
o Appropriate probe, filter and impinger temperatures will be maintained.
r The sa:npling port will be sealed to prevent air from leaking from the port.
o Dry gas meter, AP, AH, temperature and pump vacuum data will be recorded during each sample point.
o An isokinetic sampling rate of 90-l l0% will be maintained, as applicable.
o All raw data will be maintained in organized manner.
. All raw data will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability.
I,TAH DEPAFTTMENT OF
E}WIRONMENTAL OUATJTV
I A ll 'r r\n^-i -r lr L 1'N/_7
DN"':SION OF AIR QUALTT{
AST-2025-0377 Tesoro - Salt Lake City, UT Pa,ge 4-2