DAQ-2025-000049

Yr.*slfls."g..Rr
Huntington Power PIant
8 miles west of Huntington, Ulah on Hwy. 3l
P.O. Box 680
Huntington, utah 84528
November 13,2024
Mr. Bryce Bird, Director
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
And
Director, USEPA Region Vlll
8 ENF-AT
1595 Wynkoop St.
Denver, CO 80202 -1129
RE:MATS Quarterly Compliance Report,40 CFR 63 Subpart UUUUU, Huntington Power Plant
(Title V Permit #1501001005) Boiler Units 1 and 2.
Dear Mr. Bird:
Huntington Power Plant's Title V Permit Conditions 11.B.2.9.3 and 11.B.3.f.3 require the Huntington Plant to
submit Compliance Reports according to the requirements of 40 CFR 563.10031(b). This submittal
covers the period from July 1 , 2024, to September 30, 2024, and is intended to satisfy those
requirements.
I am authorized to make this submission on behalf of the owners and operators of the affected source or
affected units for which the submission is made. I certify under penalty of law that I have personally
examined, and am familiar with, the statements and information submitted in this document and all its
attachments. Based on my inquiry of those individuals with primary responsibility for obtaining the
information, I certify that the statements and information are to the best of my knowledge and belief true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false statements
and information, or omitting statements and information, including the possibility of fine or imprisonment.
Should you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Terry Guthrie, Hunter and
Huntington Plant Environmental Manager (435) 6874334 or me at [phone].
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIHONMENTAL QUALITY
N0\/ ?_ 1 2a24
DIVISION OF AIB OUAL]TY
REVIEWED
Initials JBR Date 1/8/2025
Comp Status Meets
File # 10238 Blue 2
mats reports both units in separate
reports. Both reports have all required
items.
Sincerely,
Date:11113124
Laren Huntsman
Managing Director Hunter and Huntington Plant
Responsible Official
Enclosures: Mercury and Air Toxics Quarterly Compliance Report with attachments A thru C - Units 1
and2
cc: Youn Joo Kim - USEPA Region VlllMenclosure
Josh Sewell - NTO w/o enclosure
Scarlet Jackson - NTO w/o enclosure
Russ Willson - Huntington Plant - Files
PncIFICORP
Huntington Power PIant
MATS Quarterly Compliance Report Unit 1
40 CFR 63.10031(e)
July L, 2024 - September 30,2024
OTPNII I-MENT OF
NOV 2 1 ?024
DIVISION OF AIB OUALITY
Section 1.0 - Unit I Report Summary
Huntington Power Plant, 8 miles west of Huntington Utah on Hwy 3l
P.O. Box 680
Huntington, Utah 84528
Identification of each hazardous air pollutant monitored at the affected source
L Non-Mercury HAPS metals using a quarterly filterable particulate matter (PM) stack
test as a surrogate to demonstrate compliance. On April3,20l8 the Utah Department
of Environmental Quality - Division of Air Quality agreed that the Huntington Plant
Unit I met the requirements to qualiff as a low emitting EGU (LEE) unit. The
Huntington Plant submitted a summary table showing three years of quarterly test data.
Each particulate matter (PM) testing result was below one-half of the 0.030Ib/NIMBtu
limit or 0.015 lbA4MBtu as required by the subpart.
II. Acid gases using sulfur dioxide (SOz) as a surrogate to demonstrate compliance by an
SOz continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS).
III. Mercury (Hg), compliance demonstrated by an annual EPA Method 30B sorbent trap
test to re-confirm LEE status.
A brief description of the process unit
L Huntington Unit I is an Electric Utility Steam Generating Unit, designed as a bottom
tangentially-fired boiler, designed by Babcock and Wilcox.
i. Rated Heat Input Capacity of 4,960 MMBtu/hr.
ii. The unit is equipped with the following add-on controls:
l. Pulse Jet Fabric Filter (baghouse)
2. Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (wet scrubber)
3. Low-NOx burner technology, with separated over-fire air
iii. Fuels used are sub-bituminous coal using #2 fuel oil for startup fuel when
needed.
[. Unit Category
i. Unit I is an existing coal-fired unit combusting non-low rank virgin coal
demonstrating compliance with the emission limits found in Table 2 to Subpart
UUUW of Part 63
ilL The emission and operating parameter limitations
i. Filterable PM quarterly stack testing demonstrating compliance with a 0.030
lb/IvIMBtu emission limit. The unit has demonstrated and achieved low
emitting EGU (LEE) status.
ii. SOz CEMS as a surrogate for acid gases reporting hourly averages in units of
lb/\4MBtu demonstrating compliance with a 30 boiler-operating-day average
limit of 0.20 Ib/I,IMBtu.
iii. Hg annual EPA Method 30B sorbent trap test reporting hourly averages in
units of lb/TBtu demonstrating compliance with a 30 boiler-operating-day
average of 1.2 lb/TBtu.
A description of any changes in CMS, processes, or controls since the last reporting
period
No changes occurred during the reporting period that would affect compliance to MATS.
Recent performance test results
Table l-2: Unit I Mercury LEE Test Results Summary
Test ID Test Date
IIg rate
0b/TBtu)
MATS
Hg
Threshold
Unit Status
2024 06130/2024 0.01 0.t2
LEE Achieved.
Maintained with
06/3012024 LEE test
Section 2.0 - Unit 1 MATS Compliance Report Root Data Elements
Table 2-1: Root Data Elements
2.1 Facilitv ORIS Code 8069
2.2 Facilitv Name Huntinston
2.3 Facilitv Reeistry Identifier (ORISPL)8069
2.4 Title 40 Part 63
2.5 Apolicable Subpart UUULru
Table 1-1: Unit I Filterable Particulate Matter LEE Test Results Summary
Test ID Test Date
Average
PM rate
(tb/mmBtu)
MATS
PM
Limit*
Average
PM
(lb/DIW-hr)
MATS
PM
Limit*
Unit Status
2024 03n912024 0.010 0.030 0.10 0.30
LEE
Achieved in
20r 8.
Maintained
with
311912024
LEE test
*Low Emitter Limits are 0.015 IbA{M-BTU and 0.15 lbsilvlW-HR
\l , l'- t.)tr,rllLrl. ( .,r.r1rlj. s,1 ll,1i,'11 ll,,trtttt.:.',11 l)1r\\rt l'ltrtil lintl I
2.6 Calendar Year 2024
2.7 Calendar Ouarter 3d Ouarter
2.8 Submission Comment (optional)See cover letter
Section 3.0 - Unit I Performance Stack Test Summary
For applicable elernents of Appendix E Section 3.1-3.14, see stack testing re,ports submitted for the
quarter. Stack testing data is being provided in both .xml and .pdf fomrats.
Section 4.0 - Operating Limit Data (PM, CPMS, only)
No PM CPMS on unit. Section not applicable.
Section 5.0 - Unit I Performance Test Run Data
For applicable elements of Appendix E Section 5.1-5.8, see stack testing reports submitted for the quarter.
Stack testing data is being provided in both .xml and .pdf formats.
Section 6.0 - Unit I Conversion Parameters
For applicable elements of Appendix E Section 6.1-6.3, see stack testing reports submitted for the quarter.
Stack testing data is being provided in both .xml and .pdf formats.
Section 7 .0 - Unit I Quality Assurance Parameters
For applicable elements of Appendix E Section 7.1-7 .3, see stack testing reports submitted for the quarter.
Stack testing data is being provided in both .xml and .pdf formats.
Section 8.0 - Averaging Group
Unit is not part of an averaging group.
Section 9.0 - Unit I Compliance Averages
Please see Attachment A-l which includes 30-boiler-operating-day average data for sulfur dioxide.
\i,\l\(.)rittt(r'tlr (,rt1lrlj 'r'g1. llc|(1li llrltttittrllttl)r,it'-'rl)littll Iitiil I
Section 10.0 - Unit I Information
Section I 1.0 - Unit I Fuel Usage Information
Table 11-1 Quarterly Fuel Usage Information
Table 10-1: Unit Information
Section Data Element Plant Data
10.1 Unit ID;Unit I
10.2 Date of Last Tune-up; and December 14,2022 (Next Tune-up Jan, 2025)
10.3 Emergency Bypass lnformation.No emergency bypass occurred durine quarter
Month #2 Fuel Oil Burned (gallons)Sub-Bituminous Coal Burned (tons)
July 755 70,289
August 1,902 59,692
September 2,511 51,086
Total 5,168 181,067
Note: No newfuel types were combusted during the reporting period.
Section 12.0 and 13.0 - Unit 1 Malfunction, Deviations, and Monitoring
Downtime Information
Table 12-1 Monitoring Equipment Manufacturer and Model number
Pollutant Manufacturer Model Number
Sulfur Dioxide Thermo 43iQ-ACN
Carbon Dioxide
(COz)'Thermo 4l0iQ-ACN
Table 12-2: Most Recent CMS Certification or Audit
U1 CEMS Analyzer Latest RATA Date Latest Linearity Date
Carbon Dioxide (COz)413012024 8t512024
Sulfur Dioxide (SOz)4t3012024 8t5t2024
Table l2-3: Unit Operating Time During the Reporting Period
Ul Operating Period Hours of Unit Operation
3'd Quarter,2024 2,208
Table l2-4: Excess Emission Summary
I The COz analyzer is used as a diluent for calculating heat input based emission limits
5
Ul Excess Emissions
Summary PM SOz Irg
Total Hours of Exceedance 0 0 0
Exceedance percent of total
operating hours O.0o/o 0.0%0.0%
Hours during startup and
shutdown 0 0 0
Hours during control equipment
problems 0 0 0
Hours during process hours 0 0 0
Hours during other know
problems 0 0 0
Hours during unknown causes 0 0 0
Emission Limit 0.030 0.20 1.2
Emission Limitation Unit lb/lvlMBtu lb/lvlMBtu lb/TBtu
Emission limitation averaging
period
Annual Stack
Testing
30 boiler
operating-day
Annual Stack
Testing
Trble 1&5: CMS pettormance summtry
Ul CMS Perfomance Summrry SOz
Downtime percent of total operating horus 0.09%
Total hotr of CMS downtime 2
Hours due to monitoring oquipment malfirnctions 0
Hours due to non-monitoring equipmeot malfunctions 0
Hours duc to quality aszurance/quality control calibrations 0
Hours due to other known causes 2
Hours due to otherunknown causcs 0
For applicable clcmcnts of Appendix E Sections 12.1-12.3 and 13.1-13.5, see Attachments B and C.
No deviations from rule rcquirunents occurred other than those stated on this report and attachments.
Sections 14.0 through 30.0 - Reference Method Data
For applicable elements of Appendix E Sectims 14-30, see stack testing reports submittcd for thc quafier.
Stsck testing data is being provided in both .:<ml and .pdf formats.
Section 31.0 - Other Information for Each Test or Test Series
In accordance with section 31.0 and to provide reporting transparency, all stack testing data
relevant to compliance with Subpart UUUW of Part 63 is being zubmitted in pdf format with
this quarterly compliance report.
Report Certification
Reponsible official certi&ing the accurary of the report:
l./l' ./ \.i\, L{- I
i ,/y'.",=\_r
Ifi€o Huntsman
Responsible Offisial
Managing Director - Huntington Power Plant
Date: 11113124
MA lS Quaflerly- ('onrpliarrce Report lluntington l'ower Plant Unit I
Attachments:
Attachment A: MATS 30-Day Rolling SOz lb/]vlMBtu Average Data
Attachment B: SOz Monitor Downtime Events Report
Attachment C: Excess Emissions Report
Attachment A - MATS 30 Day Rolling Average
Plant: HUNTINGTON PI-ANT
Report Period: 0710L12024 Throuqh 0913012024
Source: UNIT1 Parameter: MT3SO2#B
Value = Offline Data
Valuer = Average represents a bullding 30D Average
Value = Exceedance Report Version 5.2
Report Generate d: 05/23124 08:38 HTNDAHS04\\reportuser
Dah l-Day AYg 30-Day Avg Total
OperaUng
Yallo op€raEn!
Hours
Invalld
OperaUng
ilonltor
Avallablllty
7t1t2024 0.07 0.05 720 720 0 100.0%
7t212024 0.06 0.05 720 720 0 100.0%
7t312024 0.0s 0.05 720 720 0 100.0%
714t2024 0.05 0.05 720 720 0 100.0%
7t512024 0.09 0.05 720 720 0 100.0%
7t6t2024 0.10 0.05 720 720 0 100.0%
7t7t2024 0.08 0.06 720 720 0 100.0%
718t2024 0.08 0.06 720 720 0 100.0%
7t9t2024 0.08 0.06 720 720 0 100.0%
7110t2024 0.08 0.06 720 720 0 100.0%
7t1112024 0.11 0.06 720 720 0 100.0olo
7t12t2024 0.05 0.06 720 720 0 100.0%
7t1312024 0.11 0.07 720 720 0 100.0%
7t14t2024 0.09 0.07 720 720 0 100.0%
7t1512024 0.09 0.07 720 720 0 100.0%
7t16t2024 0.06 0.07 720 720 0 100.0%
7t17t2024 0.09 0.07 720 720 0 100.0%
7t18t202A 0.09 0.07 720 720 0 100.0%
7t19t2024 0.10 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
712012024 0.07 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
7t21t2024 0.07 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
7t22t2024 0.07 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
712312024 0.09 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
7t24t2024 0.09 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
7t2512024 0.07 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
7t26t2024 0.05 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
7127t2024 0.07 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
7t2U2024 0.07 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
7129t2024 0.06 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
7t30t2024 0.08 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
7t31t2024 0.08 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
8t112024 0.07 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
81212024 0.'10 0.08 720 720 0 100.0olo
8t3t2024 0.04 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
8t4t2024 0.07 0.08 720 720 0 100.0%
81512024 0.09 0.08 720 719 1 99.9%
8t612024 0.04 0.08 720 7',tg 1 99.9%
8t7t2024 0.04 0.08 720 719 1 99.9%
8t8t2024 0.03 0.07 720 719 1 99.9%
8t912024 0.03 0.07 720 719 1 99.9%
Attachment A - MATS 30 Day Rolling Average
Plant: HUNTINGTON PLANT
Report Period: 0710112024 Throuqh 0913012024
Source: UNIT1 Parameter: MT3SO2#B
Value = Offline Data
Valuer = Average represents a buildlng 30D Average
Value = Exceedance Report Version 5.2
Report Generate d: 05/23/24 08:38 HTNDAHSO4\\reportuser
8t1012024 0.06 0.07 720 719 1 99.9%
811112024 0.06 0.07 720 719 1 99.9%
8t12t2024 0.03 0.07 720 719 ,|99.9%
8t13t2024 0.02 0.07 720 719 1 9S.9%
811412024 0.04 0.06 720 719 1 99.9%
8t15t2024 0.03 0.06 720 719 1 s9.s%
811612024 0.06 0.06 720 719 1 99.9olo
8t17t2024 0.06 0.06 720 719 1 99.9%
8t18t2024 0.06 0.06 720 719 1 99.9%
8t1912024 0.06 0.06 720 719 1 99.9%
8t20t2024 0.07 0.06 720 7',t7 3 99.6%
8t2'v2024 0.04 0.06 720 717 3 99.6%
8t22t2024 0.05 0.06 720 717 3 99.6%
8123t2024 0.04 0.06 720 717 3 99.6%
8t24t2024 0.03 0.05 720 717 3 99.6%
8t2512024 0.03 0.05 720 717 3 99.6%
8t2612024 0.03 0.05 720 717 3 9S.6%
8t27t2024 0.02 0.05 720 717 3 99.6%
8t28t2024 0.03 0.05 720 717 3 99.6%
8t29t2024 0.05 0.05 720 717 3 99.6%
8t30t2024 0.02 0.05 720 717 3 99.6olo
8t31t2024 0.02 0.04 720 7',t7 3 99.6%
9t1t2024 0.02 0.04 720 717 3 99.6%
9t2t2024 o.o2 0.04 720 717 3 99.6%
91312024 0.05 0.04 720 717 3 99.6%
91412024 0.07 0.04 720 718 2 99.7o/o
9t5t2024 0.08 0.04 720 718 2 99.7%
91612024 0.08 0.04 720 718 2 99.7%
9t7t2024 0.07 0.04 720 718 2 99.7Yo
9t8t2024 0_09 0.05 720 718 2 99.7Yo
9t9t2024 0.07 0.05 720 718 2 99.7o/o
9t1012024 0.04 0.05 720 714 2 99.7o/o
911112024 0.03 0.05 720 718 2 99.7o/"
9t12t2024 0.03 0.05 720 718 2 99.7o/o
9t13t2024 0.04 0.05 720 718 2 99.7o/o
9t14t2024 0.03 0.05 720 718 2 99.70/o
9t15t2024 0.04 0.04 720 718 2 99.7o/o
9t16t2024 0.03 0.04 720 718 2 99.70/o
9t17t2024 0.05 0.04 720 718 2 99.7o/o
9t18t2024 0.03 0.04 720 718 2 99.70h
sh9t2024 0.04 0.04 720 720 0 100.0%
9t20t2024 0.04 0.04 720 720 0 100.0olo
Attachment A - MATS 30 Day Rolling Average
Plant: HUNTINGTON PLANT
Report Period: 0710t12024 Throuqh 0913012024
Source: UNIT1 Parameter: MT3SO2#B
9t21t2024 0.04 0.04 720 720 0 100.0olo
912212024 0.04 0.04 720 720 0 100.0%
9t2312024 0.05 0.04 720 720 0 100.0%
9t2412024 0.05 0.04 720 720 0 100.0olo
9125t2024 0.07 0.04 719 719 0 100.0%
9t26t2024 0.05 0.05 719 719 0 100.0olo
9t27t2024 0.05 0.05 719 719 0 100.0%
9t28t2024 0.06 0.05 719 719 0 100.0%
9t2912024 0.05 0.05 719 719 0 100.0%
9t3012024 0.08 0.05 719 719 0 100.0%
Value = Offline Data
Valuer = AveraSe represents a bulldint 30D Averate
Value = Exceedance
Report Generate d: 05 / 23 / 24 08:38
Report Version 5.2
HTN DAHS04\\reportuser
Attachment B
CEMS Monitor Outage Report
Sutfur Dioxide (SOz) System Monitor Outage Qb/tIMBtu)
Total duration of monitor downtime 2 hours
Description of Causes/Corrective Actions.
*Catse:724 Hours due to other known causes.
'Corrective Action: k A daily calibration reference gas bottle was
empty, resulting in an invalid calibration fail. The
bottle was changed, and a second calibration
initiated.
Attachment C
Unit I Excess Emissions Report
PM Excess Emissions
0.030IbA{MBtu (36 Month Performance Test - LEE)
Total time for all excess emissions 0.0 hours
Total time for excess emissions occurring during startup/shutdown or malfunction 0.0
hours
Malfunction reason and corrective /preventive action taken)
No PM Excess Emissions occurred during the reporting period
No PM Malfunction occurred during the reporting period
SOz Excess Emissions
0.20lbA,IMBtu (CEMS - 30 Boiler Operating Day Average)
Total time for all excess emissions QQ hours
Total time for excess emissions occurring during startup/shutdown or malfunction 0.0
hours
Malfunction reason and corrective /preventive action taken)
No SOz Excess Emissions occurred during the reporting period
SO2 monitor equipment malfunctions noted in Attachment B.
Excess
Emission
Incident
Nrrmhar
Magnitude
of Excess
Emissions
lb/MMBtu
Date Time
Beginning
Time
Ending
Hours
Involved
Malfunction
YN Cause Corrective
Action
Excess
Emlssion
Incident
Number
Magnitude
of Excess
Emissions
lb/MMBtu
Date Time
Beglnning
Time
Endlng
Hours
Involved
Malfunctlon
Y/N Cause Corrective
Action
Excees
Emlssion
Incident
Number
Magnitude
of Excess
Emisslons
lb/IvIMBtu
Date Time
Beginning
Tlme
Ending
Hours
Involved
Malfunctlon
Y/N Cause Corrective
Action
Hg Excess Emissions
1.2 lb/TBtu - Annual, 30-day Mercury Perfonnance Test - LEE
Total time for all excess emissions QQ hours
Total time for excess emissions occurring during startup/shutdown or malfunction 0.0
hours
Malfunction reason and corrective /preventive action taken)
No Hg Excess Emissions occumed during the reporting period
Hg monitor equipment malfunctions noted in Attachment B.
UI/.I.I I)FPNRTMFNT O}
F.\tvt RoNMENIAL QUALTTYi_ltI r'"'7 zl ?rtzl i
I)IVISION OF AIR OIJALITY
l%crFlEoRP
Huntington Power Plant
MATS Quarterly Compliance Report Unit 2
40 CFR 63.10031(e)
July 1,, 2024, to September 30,2024
---5TPrrnTMENT oF
euvtAonrut=Nl AL ouALlrY
Nov 21 20?4
DIVISION OF AIR OUALTW
Section 1.0 - Unit 2 Report Sumrnary
Name and address of the affected source
Huntington Power Plant, 6 miles west of Huntington Utah on Hwy 3l
P.O. Box 680
Huntington, Utah 84528
Identification of each hazardous air pollutant nronitored at the affected source
I. Non-Mercury HAPS metals using a quarterly filterable particulate matter (PM) stack
test as a surrogate to demonstrate compliance. On April3,20l8 the Utah Department
of Environmental Quality - Division of Air Quality agreed that the Huntington Plant
Unit 2 met the requirements to qualiff as a low emitting EGU (LEE) unit. The
Huntington Plant submitted a summary table showing three years of quarterly test data.
Each particulate matter (PM) testing result was below one-half of the 0.030 lb/I,IMBtu
limit or 0.015 lb/MMBtu as required by the subpart.
II. Acid gases using sulfur dioxide (SOz) as a surrogate to demonstrate compliance by an
SOz continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS).
IIL Mercury (Hg), compliance demonstrated by an annual EPA Method 308 sorbent trap
test to re-confirm LEE status.
A brief description of the process unit
I. Huntington lJnit2 is an Electric Utility Steam Generating Unit, designed as a bottom
tangentially-fired boiler, designed by Babcock and Wilcox.
i. Rated Heat Input Capacity of 4,960 MMBtU/hr.
ii. The unit is equipped with the following add-on controls:
l. Pulse Jet Fabric Filter (baghouse)
2. Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (wet scrubber)
3. Low-NOx burner technology, with separated over-fire air
iii. Fuels used are sub-bituminous coal using #2 fuel oil for startup fuel when
needed.
II. Unit Category
i. Unit 1 is an existing coal-fired unit combusting non-low rank virgin coal
demonstrating compliance with the emission limits found in Table 2 to Subpart
ULIIJW of Part 63
III. The emission and operating parameter limitations
i. Filterable PM quarterly stack testing demonstrating compliance with a 0.030
lb/\rlMBtu emission limit. The unit has demonstrated and achieved low
emitting EGU (LEE) status.
ii. SO: CEMS as a surrogate for acid gases reporting hourly averages in units of
lb/IrrlMBtu demonstrating compliance with a 30 boiler-operating-day average
limit of 0.20 lb/Iv1MBtu.
iii. Hg annual EPA Method 30B sorbent trap test reporting hourly averages in
units of lb/TBtu demonstrating compliance with a 30 boiler-operating-day
average of 1.2 lb/TBtu.
A description of any changes in CMS, processes, or controls since the last reporting
period
No changes occurred during the reporting period that would affect compliance to MATS.
Recent perfonnance test results
Table 1-1: Unit 2 Filterable Particulate Matter LEE Test Results Summary
Test ID Test Date
Average
PM rate
(lb/mmBtu)
MATS
PM
Limit*
Average
PM
(lb/IvIW-hr)
MATS
PM
Limit*
Unit Status
2024 0410912024 0.009 0.030 0.08 0.30
LEE
Achieved in
201 8.
Maintained
with
41912024
LEE test
*Low Emitter Limits are 0.015 lbAdM-BTU and 0.15 lbs/lvIW-HR
Table 1-2: Unit 2 Mercury LEE Test Results Summary
Test ID Test Date
Hg rate
(lb/TBtu)
MATS
Hg
Threshold
Unit Status
2024 04/2912024 0.01 0.12
LEE Achieved.
Maintained with
4/2912024 LEE test
Section 2.0 - Unit 2 MATS Compliance Report Root Data Elements
Table 2-1: Root Data Elements
2.r Facility ORIS Code 8069
2.2 Fac itv Name Huntinston
2.3 Fac itv Resistrv Identifier (ORISPL)8069
2.4 Title 40 Part 63
2.5 Aoolicable Suboart UUUUU
2.6 Calendar Year 2024
2.7 Calendar Ouarter 3d Ouarter
2.8 Submission Comment (optional)See cover letter
Section 3.0 - Unit 2 Performance Stack Test Summary
For applicable elements of Appendix E Section 3.1-3.14, see stack testing reports submitted for the
quarter. Stack testingdata is being provided in both .xml and .pdf formats.
Section 4.0 - Operating Limit Data (PM, CPMS, only)
No PM CPMS on unit. Section not applicable.
Section 5.0 - Unit 2 Performance Test Run Data
For applicable elements of Appendix E Section 5.1-5.8, see stack testing reports submitted for the quarter.
Stack testing data is being provided in both .xml and .pdf formats.
Section 6.0 - Unit 2 Conversion Parameters
For applicable elements of Appendix E Section 6.1-6.3, see stack testing reports submitted for the quarter.
Stack testing data is being provided in both .xml and .pdf formats.
Section 7 .0 - Unit 2 Quality Assurance Parameters
For applicable elements of Appendix E Section 7.1-7.3, see stack testing reports submitted for the quarter.
Stack testing data is being provided in both .xml and .pdf formats.
Section 8.0 - Averaging Group
Unit is not part of an averaging group.
Section 9.0 - Unit 2 Compliance Averages
Please see Attachment A-l which includes 30-boiler-operating-day average data for sulflu dioxide.
Section 10.0 - Unit 2 Information
Section I 1.0 - Unit 2 Fuel Usage Information
Table 1l-1 Quarterly Fuel Usage Information
Month #2 Fuel Oil Burned (gallons)Sub-Bituminous Coal Burned (tons)
July 8,833 67,242
August 2,840 56,845
Sept 2,590 49,269
Total 14,263 173,356
Note: No newfuel types were combusted during the reporting period.
Table 10-1: Unit Information
Section Data Element Plant Data
l0.l Unit ID Unit2
t0.2 Date of Last Tune-up December 4.2023
10.3 Emersency Bwass lnformation.No emersencv bvpass occurred durins ouarter
lir ir,,
Section 12.0 and 13.0 - Unit 2 Malfunction, Deviations, and Monitoring
Downtime Information
Table l2-l
Table 12-2: Most Recent CMS Certification or Audit
Table 12-3: Unit Operating Time During the Reporting Period
U2 Operating Period Hours of Unit Operation
3'd Quarter, 2024 2208
Table 12-4: Excess Emission Summary
I The COz analyzer is used as a diluent for calculating heat
5
Manufacfurer and Model number
Sulfur Dioxide
4l0iQ-ACN
U2 CEMS Analyzer Latest RATA Date Latest Linearity Date
Carbon Dioxide (COz)4/1U2024 8tst2024
Sultur Dioxide (SOz)4trt/2024 81512024
U2 Excess Emissions
Summary PM SOz Irg
Total Hours of Exceedance 0 0 0
Exceedance percent of total
operating hours 0.0o/o 0.0%0.0%
Hours during startup and
shutdown 0 0 0
Hours during control equipment
problems 0 0 0
Hours during process hours 0 0 0
Hours during other know
problems 0 0 0
Hours during unknown causes 0 0 0
Emission Lim t 0.030 0.20 t.2
Emission Lim tation Unit Ibs/IVIMBtu lbsiIvIMBtu lbs/TBtu
Emission limitation averaging
period
Annual Stack
Testing
30 boiler
operating-day
Annual Stack
Testing
input based emission limits
Teble lL5: CMS perforaance summrr?
U2 CMS Perfomance Summery SOz
Downtime pcrccnt of toal opcrating hours 0.76 o/o
Total hour of CMS downtime t7
Hours due to monitoring oquipmcnt malfunctions 0
Hours due to non-monitoring equipment malfunctions l4
Hours due to quality assurance/quality control calibrations 0
Hours due to other known causes 3
Hours due to other unknown causes 0
For applicable elements of Appendix E Sections 12.1-12.3 and 13.1-13.5, see Attachmcnts B and C.
No deviations from rule requircmqils ocsurred other then those stated on this r€port and attachments.
Sections 14.0 through 30.0 - Referencc Method Data
For applicable eleoreirts of Appendix E Sections 14-30, see stack testiDg reports submitted for the quartcr.
Stack testing data is being provided in both .:rml and .pdf formats.
Section 31.0 Other lnformation fbr Each Test or Test Series
In accordance with section 31.0 and to provide reporting transparency, all stack testing data
relevant to compliance with Subpart WUUU of Part 63 is being submitted in pdf format with
this quarterly compliance report.
Report Certification
Responsible official certiffing the accuracy ofthe report:
, ..
.t, :< ti*L, --.-
Laren Huntsman
Responsible Official
Managing Director - Huntington Power Plant
11t13t24
Date:
MA I'S Quarterly'Corupliance Reporr lluntingttu Porver Plant [,Jnit ]
Attachments:
Attachment A: MATS 30-Day Rolling SOz lb/I{MBtu Average Data
Attachment B: Soz Monitor Downtime Events Report
Attachment C: Excess Emissions Report
Attachment A - MATS 30 Day Rolling Average
PIant: HUNTINGTON PI.ANT
Report Period : 07 I 01. I 2024 Th rouqh 09 I 30 I 2024
Source: UNIT2 Parameter: MT3SO2#B
Value = Offline Data
Valuer = Average represents a bulldlng 30D Average
Value = Exceedance Report Version 5.2
Report Generate d:08109/24 L3:t2 HTNDAHSO4\\reportuser
Date l-Day Avg 30-Day Avg Total
OperaHng
Yalld operaun!
Hourt
Invalld
OperaUng
Monltor
Avallablllty
7t112024 0.02 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
71212024 0.02 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
713t2024 0.02 0.02 7'.t3 713 0 100.0%
7t4t2024 0.01 o.o2 713 713 0 100.0%
71512024 0.02 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t6t2024 0.01 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t7t2024 0.02 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t812024 o.o2 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t9t2024 0.04 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t10t2024 0.03 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t11t2024 0.03 0.02 713 7'.l3 0 100.0%
7t12t2024 0.02 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7113t2024 0.02 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t14t2024 0.01 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t15t2024 0.02 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t't612024 o.o2 o.o2 713 7',t3 0 100.0olo
711712024 0.02 o.o2 713 713 0 100.0%
7t18t2024 0.02 o.o2 713 713 0 100.0%
7t15t2024 0.02 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t20t2024 0.02 0.02 713 713 0 100.0olo
7t21t2024 0.01 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t22t2024 0.02 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t23t2024 0.03 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t2412024 0.03 o.o2 713 713 0 100.0%
7125t2024 0.04 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t2612024 0.02 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t27t2024 o.o2 0.02 713 713 0 100.0%
7t28t2024 0.02 o.o2 713 713 0 100.0%
7t29t2024 0.02 o.o2 716 716 0 100.0%
7t30t2024 0.02 0.02 720 720 0 100.0%
7t31t2024 0.03 0.02 720 720 0 100.0%
8t1t2024 0.04 0.02 720 720 0 100.0%
812t2024 0.03 0.02 720 720 0 100.0%
8t312024 0.03 0.02 720 720 0 100.0%
814t2024 0.03 0.02 720 720 0 100.0%
8t5t2024 0.03 0.02 720 719 1 99.9%
8t6t2024 0.03 o.o2 720 716 4 99.4%
81712024 0.02 o.o2 720 716 4 99.4%
8t812024 o.o2 0.02 720 716 4 99.4%
81912024 0.03 0.02 720 716 4 99.4Yo
Attachment A - MATS 30 Day Rolling Average
PIANT: HUNTINGTON PI-ANT
Repoft Period: 0710t12024 Throuqh 0913012024
Source: UNIT2 Parameter: MT3SO2#B
Value = Offline Data
Value* = Average represents a bullding 30D Average
Value = Exceedance Report Version 5.2
Report Generated: OBlO9l24 L3:L2 HTNDAHSO4\\reportuser
8t10t2024 0.03 0.02 720 716 4 99.4o/o
811112024 0.03 0.02 720 716 4 99.4%
811212024 0.03 o.02 720 716 4 99.4%
8t13t2024 0.02 0.03 719 714 5 99.3%
8t14t2024 0.03 0.03 719 714 5 99.3%
8t15t2024 o.o2 0.03 719 714 5 99.3%
8t16t2024 0.03 0.03 719 714 5 99.3%
811712024 0.04 0.03 719 714 5 99.3%
8t1812024 0.04 0.03 719 714 5 99.3%
8t19t2024 0.04 0.03 7'.19 7'14 5 99.3%
8120t2024 0.03 0.03 719 712 7 99.0olo
8t2',v2024 o.o2 0.03 719 712 7 99.0%
8122t2024 0.02 0.03 719 712 7 99.0%
8t23t2024 0.03 0.03 719 712 7 99.0%
8t24t2024 0.03 0.03 719 712 7 99.0%
812512024 0.03 0.03 719 712 7 99.0%
812612024 0.04 0.03 719 712 7 99.0%
8t27t2024 0.02 0.03 719 7'.12 7 99.0%
8t28t2024 0.03 0.03 719 712 7 99.0%
8t29t2024 0.04 0.03 719 712 7 99.0%
8t30t2024 0.03 0.03 719 7',t1 8 98.9%
8t31t2024 0.03 0.03 719 707 12 98.3%
9t1t2024 0.02 0.03 719 702 17 97.6Yo
912t2024 0.02 0.03 719 702 17 97.60/o
9t3t2024 0.03 0.03 719 702 17 97.6%
91412024 0.03 0.03 719 703 16 97.8To
91512024 0.03 0.03 719 706 13 98.2%
9t6t2024 0.03 0.03 719 706 13 98.2o/o
st7t2024 0.02 0.03 719 706 13 98.2Yo
9t8t2024 0.03 0.03 719 706 13 98.2o/o
st9t2024 0.04 0.03 719 706 13 98.2Yo
9t1012024 0.02 0.03 719 706 13 98.2%
9t11t2024 o.o2 0.03 719 706 13 98.2%
9t12t2024 o.02 0.03 720 708 12 98.3%
9t13t2024 0.03 0.03 720 708 't2 98.3%
9114t2024 0.03 0.03 720 708 12 98.3%
9115t2024 0.03 0.03 720 708 12 98.3%
911612024 0.03 0.03 720 708 12 98.3%
9t17t2024 0.03 0.03 720 708 12 98.3%
9t18t2024 0.02 0.03 720 708 12 98.3%
9t19t2024 0.03 0.03 720 710 10 98.6%
9t20t2024 0.03 0.03 720 709 11 98.5%
Attachment A - MATS 30 Day Rolling Average
Plant: HUNTINGTON PI-ANT
Report Period: 0710L12024 Throuqh 0913012024
Source: UNIT2 Parameter: MT3SO2#B
Value = Offline Data
valuer = Average represents a buildint 30D Average
Value = Exceedance Report Version 5.2
Report Generate d: 08lO9l2a B:72 HTNDAHS04\\reportuser
9t21t2024 0.03 0.03 720 709 11 98.5%
9t22t2024 0.03 0.03 720 709 't1 98.5%
9t23t2024 0.04 0.03 720 709 11 98.5%
9t2412024 0.03 0.03 720 709 11 98.5%
9t2512024 0.05 0.03 719 708 11 98.5%
9126t2024 0.02 0.03 719 708 11 98.5%
912712024 o.o2 0.03 719 708 11 98.5%
9t2812024 0.03 0.03 719 708 11 98.5%
9129t2024 0.02 0.03 719 709 10 98.6%
9t3012024 0.03 0.03 719 713 6 99.2%
Attachment B
CEMS Monitor Outage Report
Sulfur Dioxide (SOz) System Monitor Outage flbltvlMBtu)
Total duration of monitor downtime 17 hours
ffi ffiffi ffi ffi
I 816/2024 05:00 07:59 3 n n 722 m
2 811312024 09:00 l0:59 2 n n 722 d
3 8t20/2024 05:00 06:59 2 n n 724 k
4 8t30t2024 05:00 05:59 I n n 722 n
5 8l3r/2024 05:00 08:59 4 n n 722 n
6 9t112024 05:00 08:59 4 n n 722 n
7 9t20t2024 14:00 l4:59 I n n 724 b
Description of Causes/Corrective Actions.
*Caase:722 Hours due to non-monitor malfunctions.
'Corrective Action: m A blockage in the calibration gas solenoid valve
resulted in an invalid, failed calibrations. The
valve blockage was cleared, and the system was
returned to operation after a passinq calibration.
*Carse:722 Hours due to non-monitor malfunctions.
'Corrective Action: d A loss/intemrption of power or communication to
the DCS and/or monitor resulted in a loss of data.
Power/communications were restored, and the
monitor was returned to service.
*Caase:722 Hours due to non-monitor malfunctions.
'Corrective Action: n A stuck solenoid valve allowed span gas to
contaminate the system during the zero portion of
the dailv calibration resultine in an invalid
calibration failure. The stuck solenoid valve was
actuated, and the monitor passed the daily
calibration and retumed to normal operation.
*Catse:724 Hours due to other known causes.
'Corrective Action: b Maintenance of another monitor required normal
sampling to be intemrpted. The system was
returned to service followins the maintenance.
*Catse:724 Hours due to other known causes.
'Corrective Action: k A daily calibration reference gas bottle was
empty, resulting in an invalid calibration fail. The
bottle was changed, and a second calibration
initiated.
Attachment C
Unit 2 Excess Emissions Report
PM Excess Emissions
0.030 lbA4MBtu (36 Month Performance Test - LEE)
Total time for all excess emissions !Q hours
Total time for excess emissions occurring during starfup/shutdown or malfunction 0.0
hours
Malfunction reason and corrective /preventive action taken)
No PM Excess Emissions occurred during the reporting period
No PM Malfunction occurred during the reporting period
SOz Excess Emissions
0.20 lbA{MBtu (CEMS . 30 Boiler Operating Day Average)
Total time for all excess emissions QQ hours
Total time for excess emissions occurring during startup/shutdown or malfunction 0.0
hours
Malfunction reason and corrective /preventive action taken)
No SOz Excess Emissions occurred during the reporting period
SOz monitor equipment malfunctions noted in Attachment B.
Excess
Emission
Incident
Number
Magnltude
of Excess
Emissions
lb/]VlMBtu
Date Time
Beginnlng
Time
Ending
Hours
Involved
Malfunction
Y/N Cause Corrective
Actlon
Excess
Emission
Incident
Number
Magnitude
of Excess
Emissions
lb/MMBtu
Date Time
Beginning
Time
Ending
Hours
Involved
Malfunction
YN Cause Corrective
Actlon
IIg Excess Emissions
1.2 lb/TBtu - Annual, 30-day Mercury Perfonnance Test - LEE
Total time for all excess emissions QQ hours
Total time for excess emissions occurring during startup/shutdown or malfunction 0.0
hours
Malfunction reason and corrective /preventive action taken)
No Hg Excess Emissions occurred during the reporting period
Hg monitor equipment malfunctions noted in Attachment B.
Excess
Emlgglon
Incident
Number
Magnitude
of Excess
Emisclons
lbnUMBtu
Date Time
Beglnning
Tlme
Ending
Hours
Involved
Malfunctlon
YN Cause Corrective
Action
I I{V I F]ONMENTAL QUALITY
Ii^i i'ln'l t I ?0?t i
t'rl
t)lvtstoN oF AtR QUALTTY
tJ IAI-.l DTJPARIMENT OF