DAQ-2024-006960

1

DAQC-226-24
Site ID 10159 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – NORTH DAVIS SEWER DISTRICT – Wastewater
Treatment Plant – Davis County

THROUGH: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Oil and Gas Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Kyle Greenberg, Environmental Scientist

DATE: March 7, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: Cogeneration Engine #3: 923 kW Lean Burn Engine
Location: 4252 West 2200 South, Syracuse, Davis County, Utah
Contact: Myron Bachman: 801-825-0712
Tester: TETCO
Site ID #: 10159
Permit/AO #: DAQE-AN101590008-17, dated November 1, 2017
Subject: Review of Pretest Protocol dated April 16, 2019

On March 7, 2024, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a protocol for the testing of
Cogeneration Engine #3: Waukesha 923 kW Lean Burn Engine at North Davis Sewer District in Davis
County, Utah. Testing will be performed on May 6 and 7, 2024, to determine compliance with the
emission limits found in condition II.B.2 of DAQE-AN101590008-17.

PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:

1. Method 1 used to determine sample traverses; OK
2. Method 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate; OK
3. Method 3A used to determine O2 and CO2 concentrations of the gas stream; OK
4. Method 4 used to determine moisture content; OK
5. Method 7E used to determine NOx emissions; OK
6. Method 10 used to determine CO emissions; OK

DEVIATIONS: None.

CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable to determine the emission rates of
NOx and CO.

RECOMMENDATION: N/A.

ATTACHMENTS: North Davis Sewer District test notification letter and testing protocol.

Tel:
Fax:
801 825-0712
801 773-6320

4252 West 2200 South
Syracuse, Utah 84075
Reclaiming Earth’s Most Valuable Resource

March 7, 2024

State of Utah
Department of Environment Quality
Utah Division of Air Quality
150 North 195 West
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820

Attn: Jay Morris, Director

Subject: Submission of Stack Test Protocol and Test Dates as per Approval Order DAQE-
AN101590008-17.

Dear Mr. Morris,

In compliance with Approval Order DAQE-AN101590008-17, we submit herewith the
Stack Test protocol and test dates for the North Davis Sewer District’s Cogeneration Engine #3
Lean Burn Engine. The test schedule is planned for May 6th and 7th 2024.

Please contact me at [phone] if you have questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Myron Bachman
Plant Superintendent

Enclosures

cc: Chad Gilgen
Scott Vineyard
David Hatch

NORTH DAVIS SEWER DISTRICT
COMPLIANCE EMISSION TESTING PROTOCOL
FOR NOx AND CO EMISSIONS AT
NORTH DAVIS SEWER DISTRICT (NDSD)
SYRACUSE, UTAH
Waukesha 923 kW Lean Burn Engine
Project Organization and Responsibility
The following personnel and the testing contractor are presently anticipated to be involved in the
testing program. The Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) may have their own personnel to
observe all phases including the process.
Company
NDSD
4252 West 2200 South
Syracuse, UT 84075
Contacts
Myron Bachman [phone]
Test Contractor:
TETCO
391 East 620 South
American Fork, UT 84003
Dean Kitchen 801- 492-9106
Facility Location and Description
NDSD operates a water treatment plant in Syracuse, Utah. The process includes collecting
digester gas which is prepared as a fuel gas for onsite engines.
Test Objective
This test is being conducted to comply with the testing requirements of the Waukesha 7100GL,
923 kW engine. The engine is to be tested at least once every 5 years for NOx and CO emissions.
The results shall be reported in terms of pounds per hour (lb/hr) and grams per brake horse-
power-hour (g/bHp-hr). Testing is to be conducted according to the principals of EPA Methods
1-4, 7E, and 10.
Test Schedule
It is planned to complete all testing May 6-7, 2024. The test crew will set up the testing
equipment May 6th and then begin testing if time and production permits. If needed, testing may
be conducted on May 7th. The testing crew will take preliminary velocity and cyclonic flow
measurements prior to beginning the stack test. If desired a pretest meeting may be scheduled by
DAQ or NDSD.
Operational Data and Instrumentation
The engine will operate normally during the test project. All pertinent process data will be made
available to DAQ personnel.
Test Procedures
Three test runs will be completed on the exhaust stack. Stack testing will be EPA Methods 1-4,
7E, and 10 as specified in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A. One Method 4 test run may span up to three
Method 7E and 10 test runs. Specific procedures are as follows:
EPA Methods 1-4
1.The stack inside diameter is 13 inches. Sample ports are located 160 inches downstream
and approximately 104 inches upstream from any flow disturbance. It is planned to
sample four sample points per port (eight total points). The number of sample points is
based upon Method 1 for a nonparticulate traverse.
2.EPA Method 2 will be used to determine the gas stream velocity. Type “S” pitot tubes
will be used with a Cp factor of 0.84. Dual inclined/vertical manometers with graduations
of 0.01 inches of water will be used. If necessary a more sensitive manometer with
graduations of 0.005 may be used. The absence of cyclonic flow will be verified prior to
beginning the test.
3.EPA Method 3A will be used to measure the CO2 and O2 concentrations to determine the
gas stream dry molecular weight. These samples will be taken with the NOx and CO
sampling train. Method 3 maybe used as a backup for Method 3A.
4.EPA Method 4 will be followed to determine the gas stream moisture content. Test run
time and sample flow rate will be sufficient to sample at least 21 dscf. One Method 4
may span up to three Method 7E and 10 test runs.
5.Probe liners will be 316 stainless steel.
6.The barometric pressure will be measured with a barometer which is periodically checked
against a mercury barometer. The barometer will be checked prior to testing to assure an
accurate barometric pressure.
7.Calibration data is submitted with this protocol. Any calibration that is not current will
be re-calibrated prior to the test dates.
8.Any necessary preparation and clean-up by the contractor will be performed in the
contractor's sampling trailer or a clean area on NDSD property.
9.Verbal results will be reported to NDSD on site. The written reports will submitted
within 30 days following completion of the tests.
Gaseous Analyzer Measurements
Gaseous analyzers will be used to measure the CO2/O2, NOx and CO concentrations levels
according to EPA Methods 3A, 7E, and 10 respectfully. The gaseous analyzer measurements
will be taken simultaneously with EPA Methods 1-4. EPA Protocol 1 gases will be used as a
standard for all analyzers. Bias checks, calibration drift, zero drift and calibration error will
follow the specified guidelines of EPA Method 7E.
The gas analyzer sampling train will consist of the following: an in-stack glass fiber filter,
heated stainless steel probe, Teflon heated sampling line to the water removal system, water
removal system, Teflon transport lines, gas manifold, and out of stack Teflon filter after the gas
manifold but prior to analyzer. The sampling train is built such that the sampled gas only comes
in contact with inert materials, i.e., Teflon, stainless steel, and glass.
A data logger will be used to provide a recorded gas concentration measurements that will be
averaged on a minute basis.
A stratification check will be performed to determine the number and location of the gaseous
analyzer sample points.
Potential Hazards
Moving Equipment No
Hot Equipment Yes
Chemical Chlorine on site
Other Biological. Wash hands frequently and eat only in
designated areas.
Quality Assurance
All testing and analysis in these compliance tests will be conducted according to Methods 1-4,
7E, 10, and appropriate sections of the EPA Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems Volume III.
Reporting
Complete copies of raw data, calculations and summary of test will be included in the test report.
All process and production data will be recorded and retained for inspection and copying by
DAQ.
Appendix A
Calibration Data and Sample Equations
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.
TECHNICIAN:INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)
DATE:12/21/2023 METER SERIAL #:300315 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg):25.55 25.65 25.60 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,
METER PART #:Console 3 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #:1453S EQUIPMENT ID #:ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
K'TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED
FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3)AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN)DGM DH (1)(2)(3)Y
ORIFICE #RUN #(AVG)(in Hg)INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG q (in H2O)Vm (STD)Vcr (STD)Y VARIATION (%)DH@
1 0.8137 10 100.418 105.533 5.115 71 82 87 75 78 80.5 4.759 3.00 4.3128 4.3028 0.998 1.740
2 0.8137 10 105.533 110.912 5.379 72 85 89 78 81 83.3 5.012 3.00 4.5125 4.5278 1.003 1.735
3 0.8137 10 110.912 117.512 6.600 72 90 93 80 83 86.5 6.081 3.00 5.5038 5.4935 0.998 1.724
AVG = 1.000 -0.18
1 0.5317 11 83.911 89.115 5.204 69 69 75 66 70 70.0 7.477 1.22 4.4522 4.4262 0.994 1.675
2 0.5317 11 89.115 94.226 5.111 71 74 79 71 74 74.5 7.282 1.22 4.3358 4.3027 0.992 1.668
3 0.5317 11 94.226 99.407 5.181 72 79 83 74 75 77.8 7.332 1.22 4.3686 4.3281 0.991 1.661
AVG = 0.992 -0.91
1 0.3307 13 117.962 123.015 5.053 74 90 89 82 84 86.3 11.603 0.45 4.1851 4.2521 1.016 1.561
2 0.3307 13 123.015 128.053 5.038 75 88 89 84 86 86.8 11.514 0.45 4.1688 4.2155 1.011 1.563
3 0.3307 13 128.053 133.107 5.054 75 89 90 86 87 88.0 11.508 0.45 4.1725 4.2133 1.010 1.559
AVG = 1.012 1.08
AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = 1.001
AVERAGE DH@ = 1.654
(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions
K1 =17.64 oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 oK/mm Hg (Metric)
Tm =Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric) DH@ = 0.75 q DH Vm(std)
Vcr(std) Vm
(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions
Tamb =Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric)
Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration REFERENCE IN OUT
(3)=DGM calibration factor 32 33 32
62 63 63
204 205 205
TEMPERATURE SENSORS oF
2024 Pre-Calibration
Console #3
30
19
12
D Kitchen
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, V m (std), and the critical orifice,
Vcr (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.
()2 ()
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Date:Pitot Tube Identification:
Technician:
Dt=0.375 Is PA = PB ?
Is 1.05 • Dt  PA & PB  1.50 • Dt ?
PA = 0.455
PB =0.455
a1 < 10o a1 = o
a2 < 10o a2 = o
b1 < 5o b1 = o
b2 < 5o b2 = o
Z  0.125 in.Z = in.
W W  0.03125 in.W = in.
W > 3 inches W = in.
Z > 3/4 inch Z = in.
Y ≥ 3 inches Y = in.
The pitot tube meets the specifications for a calibration factor of 0.84?Yes
Reference:
Temperature
Source Reference Sensor
(Medium)(oF)(oF)
Probe AIR 71 71
AIR 71 70
ICE WATER 33 34
BOIL WATER 204 204
SILICONE OIL
1/3/2024 27 G-2
X. Dang
in.
0.016
0
0
2
2
0
in.
in.
Yes
Yes
0.016
6.875
0.875
3 3/4
Heat Check 248
Temperature Sensor Calibration
1
1
0Stack
Omega CL3512A
Probe Yes
Yes
Continuity Check
Temperature Temperature
Difference
(oF)
b2
b1
B
A
w
Dt
PA
PB
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Date:Pitot Tube Identification:
Technician:
Dt=0.244 Is PA = PB ?
Is 1.05 • Dt  PA & PB  1.50 • Dt ?
PA = 0.294
PB =0.294
a1 < 10o a1 = o
a2 < 10o a2 = o
b1 < 5o b1 = o
b2 < 5o b2 = o
Z  0.125 in.Z = in.
W W  0.03125 in.W = in.
W > 3 inches W = in.
Z > 3/4 inch Z = in.
Y ≥ 3 inches Y = in.
The pitot tube meets the specifications for a calibration factor of 0.84?Yes
Reference:
Temperature
Source Reference Sensor
(Medium)(oF)(oF)
Probe AIR 70 71
AIR 70 71
ICE WATER 33 33
BOIL WATER 203 203
SILICONE OIL
1/3/2024 36 S
X. Dang
in.
0.041
2
0
2
2
1
in.
in.
Yes
Yes
0.021
8
1
3 7/8
Heat Check 248
Temperature Sensor Calibration
1
0
0Stack
Omega CL3512A
Probe Yes
Yes
Continuity Check
Temperature Temperature
Difference
(oF)
b2
b1
B
A
w
Dt
PA
PB
Date:1/2/24 Calibrator:Reference:
Temperature Temperature
Source Difference
(Medium)(oF)
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water 0
Water 1
Water 0
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
202
33 33
Impinger Out K 33 33
203 203
33 33
Impinger Out J
Impinger Out H
Impinger Out I
33
203
33
203
33
203
33
203
203
201
33
G
H
Oven (3)33 33
203 203
Oven (4)33
203
Oven 33 33
203 203
Oven 33 33
33
203 202
Oven (3)
A
201203
33
Oven (3)33 33
Oven (4)
Thermocouple
Location
203 201
Impinger Out F 33 33
203
203
203
203 202
203 203
33
33
Impinger Out G
203 201
Oven (3)33
203 203
33 33
203Oven (4)
203
Impinger Out D 33 33
203 203
Impinger Out E 33 34
203 203
203
33 33
203Impinger Out B
Impinger Out C 33 33
203 202
202
Impinger Out A 33 33
203
Oven (3)
Oven (4)
TETCO
Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration
B
C 203 203
33 33
33 33
203
33 33
Xuan N. Dang Omega CL3512A
Unit ID Reference
(oF)
Sensor
(oF)
Temperature
33
D
E
Oven 33 33
203 202F
Oven (4)
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA LLC
an Air Liquide company
525 North Industrial Loop Road
Tooele, UT 84074
Airgas.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA PROTOCOL STANDARD
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:
Laboratory:
PGVP Number:
Gas Code:
E03Nl99E15A0362
EB0096011
124 -Tooele (SAP) -UT
B72023
CO,NO,NOX,BALN
Expiration Date:
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
Feb 27 2031
153-402668446-1
144.0 CF
2015 PSIG
660
Feb 27, 2023
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)" document EPA
600/R-12/531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
mole/mole basis unless otherwise noted. The results relate only to the items tested. The report shall not be reproduced except in full without approval of the laboratory. Do
Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig, i.e. 0 7 megapascals
·--··-···'--··-·------··--··ANA:tYPieAf:.·R:ESHl.'fS ---··. --·oi-----·-,-· ··-----.------
Component Requested Actual Protocol Total Relative Assay
Concentration Concentration Method Uncertainty Dates
NOX 125.0 PPM 126.4 PPM G1 +/-1.0% NIST Traceable 02/20/2023, 02/27/2023
CARBON MONOXIDE 125.0 PPM 124.1 PPM G1 +/-0.6% NIST Traceable 02/20/2023
NITRIC OXIDE 125.0 PPM 126.3 PPM G1 +/. 1.0% NIST Traceable 02/20/2023, 02/27/2023
NITROGEN Balance
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Type Lot ID Cylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
NTRM 11010111 KAL003133 97.31 PPM CARBON MONOXIDE/NITROGEN 0.4% May 25, 2028
NTRM 11060558 110605 101.2 PPM NITRIC OXIDE/NITROGEN +/-0.6% Feb 16, 2017
GMIS DCK:12072022 CC754103 98.25 PPM NITRIC OXIDE/NITROGEN 0.9 Jan 04, 2031
PRM 12409 D913660 15.01 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/AIR 1.5% Feb 17, 2023
GMIS 1534012021103 ND73012 4.956 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN 1.6% Jun 15, 2025
The SRM, NTRM, PRM, or RGM noted above is only in reference to the GMIS used in the assay and not part of the analysis.
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Instrument/Make/Model Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
Nicolet iS50 AUP2110269 CO LCO FTIR Feb 15, 2023
Nicolet iS50 AUP2110269 NO LNO FTIR Feb 23, 2023
Nicolet iS50 AUP2110269 N02 impurity FTIR NO2 impurity Feb 10, 2023
Page 1 of 1
~
an Air Liquide company
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA LLC
11711 S. Alameda Street
Los Angeles, CA 90059
Airgas.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:
Laboratory:
PGVP Number:
Gas Code:
Grade of Product: EPA PROTOCOL STANDARD
E03Nl99E15A5RD9
XC026532B
124 -Los Angeles (SAP) -CA
B32023
CO,NO,NOX,BALN
Expiration Date:
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
Feb 24 2031
48-40266844 7-1
144.0 CF
2015 PSIG
660
Feb 24, 2023
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)" document EPA
600/R-121531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
mole/mole basis unless otherwise noted. The results relate only to the items tested. The report shall not be reproduced except in full without approval of the laboratory. Do
Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig i e 0 7 megapascals · I••.•
' ANALYTICAL RESULTS --~·-•-+ --------·~----------
Component Requested Actual Protocol Total Relative Assay
Concentration Concentration Method Uncertainty Dates
NOX 230.0 PPM 234.2 PPM G1 +/-1.2% NIST Traceable 02/17/2023, 02/24/2023
CARBON MONOXIDE 230.0 PPM 230.8 PPM G1 +/-0.4% NIST Traceable 02/21/2023
NITRIC OXIDE 230.0 PPM 232.4 PPM G1 +/-1.0% NIST Traceable 0211712'023, 02/24/2023
NITROGEN Balance
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Type Lot ID Cylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
NTRM 14060317 CC432084 252.5 PPM CARBON MONOXIDE/NITROGEN +/-0.3% Feb 13, 2026
PRM 12409 0913660 15.01 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/AIR +/-1.5% Feb 17, 2023
NTRM 200603-09 EB0112912 250.3 PPM NITRIC OXIDE/NITROGEN +/-0.8% Oct 19, 2026
GMIS 1534012021101 ND73001 4.947 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN +/-1.6% Jun 15, 2025
The SRM, NTRM, PRM, or ~GM noted above is only in reference to the GMIS used in the assay and not part of the analysis.
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Instrument/Make/Model Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
SIEMENS 6E CO LOW NDIR Feb 07, 2023
Nicolet iS50 AUP2110317 NO FTIR Feb 08, 2023
Nicolet iS50 AUP2110317 NO2 FTIR Feb 09, 2023
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Page 1 of 1
DocNumber:
Linde Order Number: 7Hl6,9"693
Linde Gas & Equipment Inc.
5700 S. Alameda Street
Los Angeles CA 90058
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PGVP ID: F22021
Lot Number: 70086132602
LGEPKG SALT LAKE CITY UT H
6880 S 2300 E Pa~ Number. Nl(;b9.75ci1E-AS
Customer Pd Number: 79869904
Cylinder Style & Otdlet: AS CGA 590
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121-3183 Cylinder Pressure and Volume: 2000 psig 148 ft3
Certified Concentration ProSpec EZ Cert
Expiration Dale/_>
!l Qylinder Number.t,.
9.75 %
9.77 %
Balance
Certification Information:
This cylinder wa~ \l:ertified according to the 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol,
u~certainty at.a level of confidence of approximately 95% with a cover"~ge factof
CO2 responses have been corrected for Oxygen IR Broadening cffeci. 02 re~p
Ana/vtical Data:
1. Component: Carbon dioxide
Reques,ted Concentration: 9.75 %
Certified Concentration: 9.75 % .
Instrument Used: Horiba.VIA-510 S/N 20C 194WK
Analytical Method: NDIR
Last Multipoint Calibration: 11/2712021
NIST Traceable
Expanded Uncertainty
± 0.05 %
± 0.04 %.
[!I • .00
ii.:.
Term: 96 Months Expiration Date: 11/30/2029
.·. ,'•)!.-
p -o00/R-12/531, using Procedure G1. Uncertainty above is expressed as absolute expanded
t Use this Standard if Pressure is less than 100 PSIG.
een corrected for CO2 interference.
··i/::;:1. Reference Standard: Type/ Cylintjer#: GMIS /_CC283571
·:o:\ Concentration I Uncertainty:· 14.24 % ±0.04 % ti Expiration Date: 07/15/2029
i!c ·Traceable to: SRM #/Sample# /Cylinder#: RGM / N/A / CC28033
f SRM Concentration/ Uncertainty: 19.67% / ±0.04%
SRM E,qira!ion Dale: 07/15/2021
~F-lr-st-A--na_l_y-sl_s_D_a-ta-,------------D-ate ___ 1_1_f30!2 __ "0"'2"'1--, Second Analysis Data: Date
cOrjc: 0 Z: O R: 14.24 C: 9._75 Cone: 9.75 ;;c..,_ __ -l-'->i''...;z,!i,;~·::cl,·,ci'l•.l;;P,e".;'-,·'..;\-.·\',":"';",;R1>);:::>---'-··_,0"-.:"""'.~ee·...:·-"-',:;;.·''-'•'-· '-"0-"'_...~.;;.;:.=:.....;.
-'-------~==.-.· ~~1-4t~/~~:•~nc"'';'--'9o-."'"77,.._'---~-"'\ ;= ~ ~: ~ ~: ~.
! U~M: % : :MeanTestAssay:
Cone: 0
Cone: 0
UOM: % Mean Test Assay: 9.75 %
2, Component: Oxygen
Requested Concentration: 9.75 %
Certified Concentration: 9.77 %
Instrument Used: Siemens Oxymat 6E S/N 7MB20211AA000CA1
Analytical Method: Paramagnetic
Last Multipoint Calibration: 11/12/2021
First Analysis Data: ate 11/30/2021
Z: 0 R: 9.88 C: 9.76
R: 9.88 Z: 0 C: 9.76
Z: 0 C: 9.78 R: 9.77
UOM: % 9.77 %
Analyzed By
'Reference Standard: Type/ Cylinder#: NTRM / DT0010262
Concentration/ Uncertainly: 9.875 % ±0.040 %
Expiratloo Date: 11/18/2022
Traceable to: SRM #/Sample#/ Cylinder#: NTRM / 170701 / DT0010262
SRM Concentration/ Unce<°.alnly: 9.875% I ±0.040%
SRM Expiration Date: 11/18/2022
Second Analysis Data: Date
Cone: 0
Cone: 0
Cone: O
Z: 0
R: 0
Z: 0
UOM: %
Certified By
R: 0
Z: 0
C: 0
Nelsorl'Ma
C:
C:
R:
0
0
0
Mean Test Assay: %
Information contained herein has been prepared at your request by qualified experts within Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. While we believe that the information is aco.,rate within the limits of th~
analytical methods employed and Is complete to the extent of the specific analyses performed, we make no warranty or representation as to the suitability of the use of the Information for any purpose.
The information is offered with the understanding that any use of the infoonation is at the sole discretion and risk of the user. In no event shall the liability of Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. , arising out
of the use of the information contained herein exceed the fee estabfished for providing such information.
..
Making our world
more productive
DocNumber: 555077
Certificate Issuance Date: 08/11/2023 ,
Linde Ord~r Number: 72533908
Linde Gas & Equipment Inc.
5700 S. Alameda Street
Los Angeles CA 90058
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PGVP ID: F22023
Fill Date: 08/07/2023
Lot Number: 70086321907
Customer & Order Information
LGEPKG SALT LAKE CITY UT H
6880 S 2300 E . Pah Number: NI CD20.5O1 E-AS
Customer P~ Number: 80543739
Cylinder Style & Outlet: AS CGA 590
SALT LAKE CIT'( UT84121-3183 Cylinder Pressure and Volume: 2000 psig 158 ft3
E~piration Date:
Cylfnder Number:
20.41 %
20.73 %
Balance
Certified clncentration
08/11/2031
CC145183
Carbon dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
NIST Traceable
Expanded Uncertainty
±0.06%
±0.04%
Certijicatio,n Information: Certification Date:08/11/202,i Term: 96 Months Expiration Date: 08/11/2031
This cylinder w~ certified according to the 2012 EPA Trac~abHity Protocol, Document #E~t600/R-12/531, using Procedure G1. Uncertainty above is expressed as absolute expanded
uncertainty at a level of confidence of approximatel;· 95% with a coverage factor k = 2. Do Not Use this Standard If Pressure Is less than 100 PSIG. ·,
CO2 responses have been corrected for Oxygen IR Broadenl;i,:J affec~. 02 responses have ~Ben correclf!d for CO2 interference.
Anafvtical Data: (R=Reference Standard, Z=Zero Gas, C=Gas Candidate)
1. Component: Carbon dioxide
Requ~sted Concentration: 20.5 %
Certified Concentration: 20.41 %
Reference Standard: Type/ Cylinder#: GMIS / CC305911
Concentration/ Uncertainty: 26.96 % ±0.05 %
Expiralion Date: 03/29/2031
Instrument Used: Horiba VIA-510 S/N 20C194WK Traceable to: SRM #/Sample# /Cylinder#: RGM#CC193512 / N/A / CC193512
Analytical Method: NDIR
Last Multipoint Calibration: 07/28/2023
First Analysis Data:
Z: 0 R: 26.96 C:
Date
20.42 Cone:
08/11/2023
20.42
'" 2e.se ·~--z~,-~---~-,,.~~---~"'2"'0 . ..,.4•1-~,,.__,_. 0 C: 20.41 -~·"-Cone:
Z: 0 C: 20.41 20.41 R: 26.96 Cone:
UOM: % 20.41 % Mean Test Assay:
2. Component: Oxygen
Requested Concentration: 20.5 %
Certified Concentration: 20.73 %
Instrument Used: Siemens Oxymat 6E S/N 7MB20211AA000CA 1
Analytical Melhod: Paramagnetic
Last Multipoint Calibration: 07/28/2023
First Analysis Data:
Z: 0 R: 24.96
Z: 0
C: 20.76
C: 20.75
C: 20.73
R: 24.98
Date 08/11/2023
Cone: 20.74
Cone: 20.72
Cone: 20.75
R: 24.99
Z: 0
UOM: % Mean Test Assay: 20.73 %
Analyzed By
SRM Concentralion / Uncertainty: 26.99% / ±0.05%
SRM Expiration Date: 05/15/2023
Second Analysis Data: Date
_z, __ o R: 0. C: O Cone: O .~z~,-~o ..... --c;~---Col'I~: ·Q~ R: O
Z: 0 C: O R: O Cone: o
UOM: % Mean Test Assay:
Reference Standard: Type/ Cylinder#: GMIS / DT0025134
Concentration / Uncertainty: 24.96 % ±0.04 %
Expiration Date: 12/14/2026
Traceable to: SRM #/ Sample#/ Cylinder#: SRM 2659a /71-E-19/ FF22331
SRM Concentration/ Uncertainty: 20.863% /±0.021%
SRM Expiration Date: 02/27/2026
Second Analysis Data: Date
Z: 0 R: 0 C: 0 Cone: 0
R: 0 Z: 0 C: 0 Cone: 0
Z: 0 C: 0 R: 0 Cone: 0
UOM: % Mean Test Assay:
CertifleffBy
%
%
Information contained herein has been prepared at your request by qualified experts within Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. While we believe that the information is accurate within the limits of the
analytical methods employed and is complete to the extent of the specific analyses performed, we make no warranty or representation as to the suitability of the use of the informatiori for any purpose.
The information is offered with the understanding that any use of the information is at the sole discretion and risk of the user. In no event shall the liability of Linde Gas & Equipment Inc. , arising out
of the use of the Information contained herein exceed the fee established for providing such information. Page 1 of 1