DERR-2024-012791

INTERNATIONAL SMELTER NPL SITE
ANNUAL GROUNDWATER SAMPLING JUNE 2013

Prepared For:

Atlantic Richfield Company
317 Anaconda Road
Butte, MT 59701

Prepared by:

977 West 2100 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
[phone]
AUGUST 2013
--ANDERSON
Anderson Engineering Co., Inc. 1 August 2013

IS&R NPL Site
Groundwater Sampling Report
June 2013 Annual Sampling Round

Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 1
2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1
2.1 Site History .................................................................................................................. 1
3.0 FIELD SAMPLING ............................................................................................................ 4
3.1 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................. 4
3.2 Field Procedure ........................................................................................................... 4
3.2.1 Depth Measurements .......................................................................................... 5
3.2.2 Well Purging/Field Parameter Measurements ..................................................... 5
3.2.3 Field Parameter Measurement Variances ........................................................... 6
3.3 Laboratory Analysis ..................................................................................................... 6
3.3.1 Laboratory Analysis Variances ............................................................................ 7
4.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS .................................................................................................. 7
4.1 Analytical Results – Well Summary ........................................................................10
4.2 Groundwater Flow Characteristics ..........................................................................13
5.0 QUALITY CONTROL .......................................................................................................13
5.1 Field QC .....................................................................................................................13
5.2 Laboratory QC ............................................................................................................14
5.3 QC Conclusion ...........................................................................................................15
6.0 FUTURE SAMPLING .......................................................................................................15
7.0 VARIANCES ....................................................................................................................15
8.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................15
List of Figures
Figure 1 Groundwater Monitoring Wells
Figure 2 Groundwater Elevation Trend
Figure 3 Arsenic Concentration Trend
Figure 4 Review of Groundwater Arsenic Dissolved Data (Flowchart)
List of Tables
Table 1 Physical Characteristics of Monitoring Wells
Table 2 Depth to Groundwater
Table 3 Purge Volumes
Table 4 Water Quality Parameters
Table 5 Arsenic Concentration Trends
Table 6 Review of Groundwater Arsenic Dissolved Analytical Data
Table 7 GW-3A and GW -32A Relative Percent Difference (June 2013)
Table A-1 Project Water Quality Database
Table A-QC Laboratory QC Results
List of Appendices
Appendix A Database Spreadsheet
Appendix B Groundwater Sampling Forms
Appendix C Standard Operating Procedures
Appendix D Laboratory Analytical Rep
Anderson Engineering Co., Inc. 1 August 2013

IS&R NPL Site
Groundwater Sampling Report
June 2013 Annual Sampling Round

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In accordance with the extended Long Term Operation and Maintenance (LTO&M) Plan for the
International Smelting and Refining Company (IS&R) site, one annual groundwater sampling
event was completed in June 2013. Groundwater from seven wells (GW -1BR, GW -1, GW -3A,
GW -4, GW -7, GW -8, and GW -11) was collected and analyzed (see Figure 1).
Analysis of samples collected during the June 2013 sampling round showed arsenic
concentrations down in GW-7 and GW -8, and up in GW-1 from the previous sampling round
(Fall 2012). The four-point rolling average of arsenic in GW-1 and GW-8 has decreased 1.63%
and 4.50% respectively. The four-point rolling average of arsenic in GW-7 increased 8.09%.
Groundwater samples from all other tested wells had arsenic concentrations below 0.05 mg/L.
Groundwater elevations in wells GW -1, GW -3A, GW-7 and GW -8 decreased with a range of
1.92 feet to 1.5 feet since Fall of 2012. Well GW -4 had an increase in groundwater elevation of
6.27 feet, while GW -11 and GW-1BR increased 1.00 feet and 0.85 feet respectively. Figure 2
shows the groundwater elevation trend in the site wells.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 Site History
IS&R began metals smelting in Tooele in 1910 on approximately 1,200 acres on the
western flank of the Oquirrh Mountains. From 1910 through 1972, IS&R operated, at
various periods of time, copper and lead smelters and a lead-zinc flotation mill. The copper
smelter was closed in 1946, followed by the closure of the lead/zinc flotation mill in 1968,
and finally, closure of the lead smelter in 1972. With the exception of a few incidental
buildings, the smelter facility was razed in the mid-1970s.
The original 1,200 acres of area occupied by the smelter is now part of the 3,000 acre
Conservation Area. Significant reclamation to mitigate potential sources of arsenic within
the Conservation Area took place in 1986, with additional smaller actions completed since.
The most recent actions occurred in 2006-2007. Remedial construction included placement
of clean soil cap over impacted areas, reshaping of the surface for storm runoff control,
installation of drainage control structures and re-vegetation of disturbed areas.
Groundwater beneath the Site meets the Federal Drinking Water standard of 0.010 mg/L
for arsenic in all wells except at the base of Pine Canyon where collected samples have
contained elevated concentrations. The IS&R Remedial Investigation concluded that the
arsenic present in groundwater at the base of pine canyon is most likely a result of
interaction with the natural geologic formation in the area. The Tooele County Health
Department has instituted restrictions on culinary water well development to protect
residents from such groundwater.
18
7
13
12
13
12
14
11
GW-4
GW-3A
GW-1
THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY OF ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, 317 ANACONDA ROAD,
BUTTE, MT, 59701 AND SHALL NOT BE COPIED, REDUCED, OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THEIR WRITTEN PERMISSION.
IS&R NPL SITE
GROUNDWATER
MONITORING
LOCATIONS
BI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER
SAMPLING
TOOELE, UTAH
1" = 40'
1
977 WEST 2100 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84119(801) 972-6222
2010-11-13
97-069
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD
COMPANY
SDA
KBC
RSH
4
l
.!i
i ...
i
~ ... ..
t
~
I
f
]
~
---,-fl11 '--'----4 __ _
2 >3 _ --- -
!
f !
l
f .,
t !
l
~ ..
0 ..
"' ;
j
..
~
0
.,;
I
1
~ 0
i
~
~
ea ;
2223
2726
..
~ =-------· - ----
1
I
I
r General Notes
~ ,
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
BOUNDARY
s GROUNDWATER
MONITORING WELL
WITH As < 0.05 mg/I
s GROUNDWATER
MONITORING WELL
WITH As > 0.05 mg/I
~
J
Scale in Feet
I ~-, I
0 750 1500
,_ No . Revision/Issue Date~
r
.,. .,,I
~ ,__ ,
ANDERSON
ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC .
.,. .,,I
r ,
r DRAWN BY:
ENGINEER:
'-APPROVED: ....
rProjact ,..., ,
Dot.
Sool•
.,,I
0''
1''
2''
3''
4''
5''
6''
7''
8''
9''
10''
11''
12''
13''
14''
15''
16''
17''
18''
19''
20''
21''
22''
23''
24''
4,370'
4,380'
4,390'
4,400'
4,410'
4,420'
4,430'
4,440'
4,450'
GW

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Date
Figure 2
IS&R Groundwater Elevation Trend
GW-1
GW-3A
GW-4
GW-7
GW-8
GW-11
GW1BR
Annual
Precip (in)
An
n
u
a
l

P
r
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
I
I I
I ' I ' --+-
X --+--
' ' -----
-------
---e--
-» •
IS&R NPL Site
Groundwater Sampling Report
June 2013 Annual Sampling Round
Anderson Engineering Company Inc. 4 August 2013
3.0 FIELD SAMPLING
3.1 Scope of Work
In accordance with the LTO&M Plan for the site, Atlantic Richfield is monitoring
groundwater wells located inside the Conservation Area on an annual basis following the
completion of the Five Year Review in the fall of 2012. The Constituent of Concern (COC)
for groundwater is arsenic.
The objective for monitoring Conservation Area wells is to determine if concentrations of
arsenic remain within a range similar to the analytical results found in recent years, or to
trigger a response in the event that concentrations increase.
Seven monitoring wells were included in this sampling event that occurred between June 4
and June 7, 2013. The location of the wells sampled is shown on Figure 1. Table 1 shows
the physical characteristics of the wells sampled.
Table 1
Physical Characteristics of Monitoring Wells
June 2013
Well
Designation Date
Casing
Diameter
(inch)
Screened
Interval
(feet)
Depth of
Well
(feet)
Depth to
Water (feet)
Surface
Casing
Elevation
(feet)
Water
Elevation
(feet)
Year
Installed
GW -1 6/7/2013 6 600 - 650 665 610 5006.7 4396.7 1975
GW -1BR 6/6/2013 4 736 - 746 747 617.25 5003.49 4386.24 2004
GW -3A 6/5/2013 6 630 - 650 643.5* 619.5 5003.9 4384.4 2002
GW -4 6/4/2013 6 610 - 739 738* 685 5071.62 4386.62 unknown
GW -7 6/7/2013 4 605 - 655 654* 592.9 4988.7 4395.8 2004
GW -8 6/7/2013 4 615 -665 654* 596.95 4992.8 4395.85 2004
GW -11 6/5/2013 6 684 - 730 742 700 5087.2 4387.2 2005
*Wells with Total Depths at time of sampling shallower than bottom of screened interval at time of installation
3.2 Field Procedure
Wells were sampled in accordance with the following Standard Operating Procedures
(SOP; Included in Appendix A):

• SOP 1-3 ISRGW: Sample ID and Tracking
• SOP 1-4: Field QC
• SOP 1-5: Use of Field Log Books
• SOP 1-6: Sample Custody and Documentation
• SOP 1-11: Packaging and Shipment of Field Samples
• SOP 2-8: Preservation and Handling of Aqueous Samples
• SOP 2-9: Field Water Quality Measurements
• SOP 4-1: Groundwater Sampling
• SOP 4-9: Well Purging
IS&R NPL Site
Groundwater Sampling Report
June 2013 Annual Sampling Round
Anderson Engineering Company Inc. 5 August 2013
3.2.1 Depth Measurements
Prior to sampling each well, the depth-to-water was measured with an electronic water
level meter. Groundwater elevations declined from the beginning of the Remedial
Investigation in 2001 until 2010. For unknown reasons since 2010 elevations have
exhibited higher periodic fluctuations and have trending upward. Refer to Table 2 for
cumulative depth to groundwater information.
Table 2
Depth to Groundwater in Wells
Date
Well and Depth To Water From Top of Casing
GW-1 GW-3A GW-4 GW-7 GW-8 GW-11 GW1BR
Dec-01 595.0 *NA NA NA NA NA NA
Apr-02 597.0 NA 669.0 NA NA NA NA
Jun-02 598.0 600.0 669.0 NA NA NA NA
Sep-02 598.4 604.4 671.9 NA NA NA NA
Dec-02 601.0 606.0 674.0 NA NA NA NA
Mar-03 602.9 606.5 NA NA NA NA NA
Jun-04 607.8 NA NA 590.4 594.2 NA 613.6
Sep-05 606.5 615.8 684.3 589.0 592.8 NA 616.0
Nov-05 607.1 616.8 684.3 589.8 594.1 NA 616.3
Dec-05 607.4 616 684.6 590.0 594.6 NA 616.4
Jan-06 NA NA NA NA NA 699.1 NA
Feb-06 NA NA NA NA NA 698.5 NA
Dec-07 611.6 618.6 686.5 594.4 598.6 701.3 618.0
May-08 614.1 619.2 686.8 596.7 600.6 702.0 619.2
Nov-08 615.0 622.1 689.6 597.6 601.9 704.5 622.0
May-09 616.6 622.2 690.1 599.2 603.5 705.1 622.1
Oct-09 616.1 624.7 691.6 599.9 602.7 706.8 623.9
Jun-10 617.1 623.7 691.2 600.0 604.3 706.2 622.8
Dec -10/Feb-11 616.5 NA 692.8 599.0 602.7 NA 629.4
Jun-11 615.3 624.2 691.9 598.0 601.7 706.6 623.7
Nov-11 NA 619.8 688.6 584.0 588.0 702.8 620.5
Jun-12 618.8 616.4 682.2 580.5 589.3 697.1 615.2
Nov-12 608.1 617.9 691.3 591.4 595.2 701.0 618.1
Jun-13 610.0 619.5 685.0 592.9 597.0 700.0 617.3
*NA: Information not available

3.2.2 Well Purging/Field Parameter Measurements
Using the depth-to-water, total depth of the well, and well diameter, the volume of
water contained within the water column was determined. The SOP requires that a
minimum of three casing volumes be purged from each well prior to sample collection.
In addition, the physical parameters of the water were field monitored to determine if
the groundwater had stabilized (see SOP 4-9).

Table 3 shows the calculated minimum purge volumes and the actual quantity of
water purged from each well prior to collecting the sample.
IS&R NPL Site
Groundwater Sampling Report
June 2013 Annual Sampling Round
Anderson Engineering Company Inc. 6 August 2013
Table 3
Purge Volumes - November 2012

Well Diameter
(inch) Date
Height
of Water
Column
Volume
of Water
Column
Minimum
Purge
Volume
Actual
Purge
Volume
(ft) (gal) (gal) (gal)
GW -1 6 6/7/2013 55.0 80.8 242.4 272.0
GW -1BR 4 6/6/2013 129.8 84.7 254.1 302.6
GW -3A 6 6/5/2013 24.0 35.3 105.8 157.5
GW -4 6 6/4/2013 55.0 80.8 242.4 255.0
GW -7 4 6/7/2013 61.1 39.9 119.7 128.0
GW -8 4 6/7/2013 57.1 37.2 111.7 112.0
GW -11 6 6/5/2013 35.0 51.4 154.2 213.3

A Horiba U-22 water quality meter was used to measure the required parameters of
the purge water. The following parameters were measured under the following
criteria to determine when the water in the well stabilized within three readings:
• pH ±0.1 unit
• Conductivity 3%
• Temperature 3%
• Turbidity 10%
The Oxygen Reduction Potential (ORP) was measured and recorded on field
sampling logs, but is not required for stabilization monitoring per SOP 4-9.
A 10 horsepower submersible pump was lowered into each well using a pump and
work over rig with mast. The discharge pipe consisted of Schedule 120 PVC. The
pumping rate ranged between approximately 1 and 5 gallons per minute.
After at least three well volumes were discharged and the wells were determined to
be stabilized, samples were collected from each well and placed in laboratory-
provided plastic bottles. Samples to be analyzed for anions and physical properties
were collected in non-preserved bottles. Samples to be analyzed for dissolved metals
were filtered using a disposable 0.45 micron filter prior to being collected in bottles
preserved with HNO3.
3.2.3 Field Parameter Measurement Variances
Due to inconsistencies in field readings, the Horiba U22 water quality meter was
changed out after the first well (GW -4) was sampled. No further issues were identified
after the meter was replaced. Refer to Appendix B for additional field notes found on
the Groundwater Sampling Log Forms.
3.3 Laboratory Analysis
Collected samples were submitted to Pace Analytical Services, Inc. of Lenexa, Kansas for
analysis of the parameters and analytes listed on Table 4. Samples were shipped via
IS&R NPL Site
Groundwater Sampling Report
June 2013 Annual Sampling Round
Anderson Engineering Company Inc. 7 August 2013
overnight delivery to the analytical laboratory in sample coolers with ice. All holding time
requirements were met for the samples. Samples were accompanied by proper chain-of-
custody documentation.
Table 4
Water Quality Testing Parameters and Holding Times
Parameter Analytes Preparation
Method
Analytical
Method (1) CRQL Units MCL
(mg/L) Preservative Holding
Time (2)
Dissolved
Metals
Arsenic 3005A/3010A 6020A 0.01 mg/L 0.05 Filter on
site(4),
6 months
Calcium 3005A/3010A 6010C 5 mg/L -
Iron 3005A/3010A 6010C 0.1 mg/L 0.3(5)
HNO3 to
pH<2 Lead 3005A/3010A 6020A 0.003 mg/L 0.015
Magnesium 3005A/3010A 6010C 5 mg/L -
Anions Chloride 9056A(7) 9056A(7) 10 mg/L 250(5) None 28 days
Sulfate 9056A(7) 9056A(7) 10 mg/L 250(5)
Cool to 4o C
28 days
Physical
Properties
TSS NA(3) SM 2540D(6) 5 mg/L - 7 days
TDS NA SM 2540C(6) 10 mg/L 500 7 days
Alkalinity NA SM 2320B(6) 5 mg/L - 14 days

Notes:
1. Unless otherwise noted, all methods are SW-846, Fourth Edition, January 2008.
2. Holding time is the period of time from the date sampled to the date of analysis.
Allowable holding times are taken from Methods for the Chemical Analysis of Water and
Wastes, March 1983, EPA-600/4-79-020.
3. NA = Not applicable.
4. Filtration performed using a 0.45 micron glass fiber filter.
5. EPA Secondary Maximum Containment Level.
6. EPA Clean Water Act Approved Analytical Methods, May 2012.
7. EPA Method 300.0 may be used in place of Method 9056A for Chloride and Sulfate
analysis.
3.3.1 Laboratory Analysis Variances
The following analytes were prepared and/or analyzed under a method not specified in
Table 4 for reasons that follow:
• Sample batch reserved for Chloride and Sulfate were prepared and analyzed
under EPA method 300.0. Same testing equipment is used for EPA Method
9056A as 300.0 with identical hold times for Chloride and Sulfate. EPA Method
300.0 is approved for use in place of Method 9056A under these criteria.
4.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
The results of the investigation are summarized on Table A-1. Arsenic is the only elevated
constituent of concern to be detected at the site, and is currently only found above the
Groundwater Quality Standard of 0.050 mg/L within three wells; GW-1, GW-7 and GW-8. Table
5 shows the trend in arsenic concentrations in wells GW -1, GW -8 and GW-7. Figure 3 presents
a graph of the concentrations over time within wells GW -1, GW -7 and GW-8.
IS&R NPL Site
Groundwater Sampling Report
June 2013 Annual Sampling Round
Anderson Engineering Company Inc. 8 August 2013
The current arsenic concentration in well GW -1 of 0.170 milligrams per liter (mg/L) is consistent
with historical concentrations in this well. The current arsenic concentration in well GW -8 of
0.067 mg/L is similar in magnitude to what was previously recorded in June 2012. The arsenic
concentration in well GW-7 of 0.075mg/L is consistent with historical concentrations in this well.
Figure 4 shows the EPA approved flowchart for reviewing the groundwater results. Sample
results from this sampling event indicate that the arsenic 4-point rolling averages for GW -1, GW -
7 and GW-8 are lower than the previous 5-year high value for those wells, as indicated in Table
6; therefore no changes are necessary in sampling protocol. Refer to Figure 3 for a correlation
between Arsenic concentration and the 4-point rolling average for Arsenic over time for wells
GW -1, GW -7 and GW -8.
The decision chart in Figure 4 indicates that when the 4-point rolling average increase is less
than 30% from the previous high concentration, no additional specific action is stipulated.

Table 5 - IS&R Arsenic Concentration Trends
June 2013
Well Date Arsenic mg/l
GW-1 12/17/2001 0.139
Average, mg/l 5/1/2002 0.140
0.153 6/20/2002 0.140
9/18/2002 0.141
12/5/2002 0.130
3/26/2003 0.137
3/26/2003 0.143
3/30/2004 0.154
6/2/2004 0.138
12/7/2005 0.150
12/10/2007 0.140
5/28/2008 0.160
11/6/2008 0.170
5/28/2009 0.170
10/29/2009 0.180
6/10/2010 0.170
2/15/2011 0.186
6/8/2011 0.180
11/23/2011 0.140
GW-1 Cont’d 6/5/2012 0.136
11/28/2012 0.157
6/7/2013 0.170
Well Date Collected Arsenic
GW-7 6/22/2004 0.174
Average, mg/l 6/22/2004 0.171
0.091 12/6/2005 0.110
IS&R NPL Site
Groundwater Sampling Report
June 2013 Annual Sampling Round
Anderson Engineering Company Inc. 9 August 2013
12/11/2007 0.097
5/29/2008 0.089
11/7/2008 0.088
5/28/2009 0.081
10/30/2009 0.092
6/11/2010 0.090
2/16/2011 0.060
6/8/2011 0.054
11/23/2011 0.019
6/6/2012 0.063
11/28/2012 0.098
6/7/2013 0.075
Well Date Collected Arsenic
GW-8 6/29/2004 0.166
Average, mg/l 12/6/2005 0.130
0.097 12/12/2007 0.100
5/30/2008 0.097
11/7/2008 0.099
5/29/2009 0.100
10/28/2009 0.110
6/11/2010 0.097
2/16/2011 0.097
6/8/2011 0.081
11/28/2011 0.073
6/6/2012 0.068
11/29/2012 0.073
6/7/2013 0.067
Groundwater Quality Standards 0.050

IS&R NPL Site
Groundwater Sampling Report
June 2013 Annual Sampling Round
Anderson Engineering Company Inc. 10 August 2013
Table 6
Review of Groundwater Arsenic Dissolved Analytical Data
June 2013 Sample Round
Well
Current
Concentration
(mg/L)
4-Point
Rolling Avg.
(mg/L)
Previous 5-yr
High (mg/L)
% Difference
From 5-Yr High
GW -1 0.170 0.151 0.186 -18.95
GW -7 0.075 0.064 0.098 -35.16
GW -8 0.067 0.070 0.110 -36.36
4.1 Analytical Results – Well Summary
GW -1
Arsenic concentrations have ranged from 0.130 mg/L to 0.186 mg/L over the period of time
between December 2001 and June 2013. These concentrations are consistent with arsenic
concentrations found in this well since the 1970s. The average concentration in this well
since 2001 is 0.153 mg/L. The arsenic concentration has fluctuated within the above range
from time to time with the overall trend remaining steady. The concentration of arsenic in
the most recent sampling event is 0.170 mg/L, below the previous 5-yr high of 0.186 mg/L.
GW -1BR
Well GW -1BR is completed in a deeper zone of the aquifer than GW -1, GW -7, and GW-8.
Arsenic concentrations within this well have historically been below detection or just above
the detectable limit. The concentration of arsenic in the most recent sampling event is
0.0015 mg/L.
GW -3A
Arsenic concentrations within well GW -3A have historically been below detection or just
above the detectable limit. The concentration of arsenic in the most recent sampling event
is 0.0011 mg/L. For field quality control purposes, a duplicate sample set was taken at well
GW -3A. The duplicate sample contained an arsenic concentration of 0.0012 mg/L.
GW -4
Arsenic concentrations within well GW -4 have historically been below detection or just
above the detectable limit. The concentration of arsenic in the most recent sampling event
is 0.0017 mg/L.
GW -7
Arsenic concentrations within well GW -7 have been steady to slightly trending downward
since 2004. The concentration in the most recent sampling event is 0.075 mg/L.

0.01
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.09
0.11
0.13
0.15
0.17
0.19
0.21
Ar
s
e
n
i
c

(
m
g
/
L
)
Date
Figure 3
IS&R Groundwater Arsenic Concentration Trend
GW-1
GW-7
GW-8
GW1RA
GW7RA
GW8RA
RA = Rolling
4-pt Average
Is Arsenic 4-pt
rolling average
>50 ppb?
Has Arsenic 4-pt rolling
average increased 30%
from previous highest
value of last 5 years?
Has Arsenic 4-pt rolling
average increased 50 %
from previous highest
value of last 5 years?
No action until next
sample round
Notify EPA and DEQ and
continue sampling per O&M
Plan
Notify EPA and DEQ. Evaluate and
determine if new SAP Action Plan is
needed.
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Figure 4
Review of Groundwater Arsenic Dissolved Analytical Data
IS&R Long Term Operations and Maintenance
No action until next
sample round
Is Well in Group
GW-1, GW-7,
GW-8?
Yes
Yes
No
IS&R NPL Site
Groundwater Sampling Report
June 2013 Annual Sampling Round
Anderson Engineering Company Inc. 13 August 2013
GW -8
Similar to GW -7, arsenic concentrations in well GW-8 continue to remain steady to trending
downward. The concentration in the most recent sampling event is 0.0674 mg/L.
GW11
GW -11 is completed in a deeper zone of the aquifer than GW-1, GW-7, and GW-8. Arsenic
concentrations within GW-11 have historically been below detection or just above the
detectable limit. The concentration of arsenic in the most recent sampling event is 0.0028
mg/L.
4.2 Groundwater Flow Characteristics
Based on previously published potentiometric contours and the IS&R/Carr Fork Remedial
Investigation (RI, 2007), water beneath the IS&R site generally flows in a west-
northwesterly direction towards the Great Salt Lake. In addition to the general west-
northwesterly flow, isolated anomalies (such as the separated hydraulic zone at the base of
Pine Canyon) have bearing on the findings and conclusions found in the RI, 2007 report
with respect to the groundwater associated with the Site. Groundwater elevations
measured in June 2013 in wells GW -1, GW -1BR, GW -3A, GW -4, GW -7, GW -8, and GW-11
are consistent with elevation fluctuations previously recorded. There is no indication that
directional flow and the hydraulic gradient of groundwater for the Site has altered.
5.0 QUALITY CONTROL
In addition to the standard laboratory Quality Control (QC), field QC samples for this sampling
event included a field duplicate and equipment blank.
5.1 Field QC
A field duplicate water sample was collected from Well GW -3A. During sample collection,
the duplicate sample bottles were filled simultaneously from the discharge stream of water.
The duplicate sample was submitted to the analytical laboratory with the label of GW -32A,
so as to serve as a “blind duplicate.”

Table 7 compares the analytical results from GW-3A and the duplicate sample, and
presents the Relative Percent Difference (RPD). The target RPD for aqueous samples is ±
20%, unless the results are less than 5 times the method detection limit (MDL), in which
case the acceptance criteria is ± the MDL. The RPD for all analytes tested for the duplicate
samples were within the acceptance criteria.
Equipment blank (GW-1EB) was collected by pouring distilled water through the
decontaminated discharge manifold and equipment following the sampling of GW -1. The
equipment blank was analyzed for the same constituents as the other samples. All
constituents of concern were below detectible limits in the equipment blank sample, except
for Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) with a concentration of 16.0 mg/L.
IS&R NPL Site
Groundwater Sampling Report
June 2013 Annual Sampling Round
Anderson Engineering Company Inc. 14 August 2013
Table 7
GW-3A and GW-32A (Duplicate of GW-3A)
Relative Percent Difference
June 2013 Sample Round

Analyte GW-3A
GW-32A
(GW-3A
Duplicate)
RPD (%)
Arsenic 0.0011 0.0012 8.70
Calcium 70.4 79.2 11.76
Iron <0.05 <0.050 0.00
Lead <0.001 <0.001 0.00
Magnesium 28.2 31.1 9.78
Alkalinity 262 265 1.14
Chloride 45.5 44.9 1.33
Sulfate 65 64.7 0.46
TDS 444 421 5.32
TSS <5.0 <5.0 0.00
Results reported in mg/L
5.2 Laboratory QC
Laboratory QC batch reports are included with the analytical reports in Appendix D. The
laboratory control sample (LCS), method blank, matrix spike, and matrix spike duplicate
(MS/MSD) sample results were all within the established limits of concentration, percent
recovery, and relative percent difference except for:
• Matrix Spike Duplicate sample #1204781 for calcium had a RPD of 54 percent,
greater than the max RPD of 20 percent. Batch accepted based on laboratory
control sample (LCS) recovery.
• Sample Duplicate sample #1203736 for TDS had a RPD of 32 percent, greater than
the max RPD of 17 percent. The Result and Duplicate Result for TDS were 4,090
mg/L and 2,970 mg/L respectively. TDS is not a constituent of concern and is used
as a benchmark for analysis; therefore this exception is of no concern.
• Sample Duplicate sample #1204423 for TDS had a RPD of 21 percent, greater than
the max RPD of 17 percent. The Result and Duplicate Result for TDS were 10,900
mg/L and 8,800 mg/L respectively. TDS is not a constituent of concern and is used
as a benchmark for analysis; therefore this exception is of no concern.
• Sample Duplicate sample #1204200 for TSS had a RPD of 29 percent, greater than
the max RPD of 25 percent. The Result and Duplicate Result for TSS were 8 mg/L
and 6 mg/L respectively. The detectable limit for TSS is 5 mg/L. Due to low levels of
TSS detected, this laboratory QC result is of no concern.
IS&R NPL Site
Groundwater Sampling Report
June 2013 Annual Sampling Round
Anderson Engineering Company Inc. 15 August 2013
5.3 QC Conclusion
• The duplicate sample analysis had good correlation, and in general was within QC
limits; with exceptions noted in Section 5.2.
• The equipment blank was analyzed for the same constituents as the other
samples.
• A Total Dissolved solids concentration of 16.0 mg/L was detected in the
equipment blank sample. All other analytes were below detectable limits.
• Except for the items noted in Section 5.2, the laboratory QC results were all within
the established acceptance guidelines.
6.0 FUTURE SAMPLING
The next sample round is to be completed in June 2014. Future sample analysis will include the
constituents indicated in Table 4.
7.0 VARIANCES
Analysis for TDS and TSS for well GW -4 was conducted outside the EPA method holding time
of 7 days. The TDS concentration for well GW -4 was re-analyzed following receipt of Pace
Analytical Laboratory Summary Report, because it appeared the TDS concentration was
abnormally higher than historical measurements. Subsequent findings from re-analysis showed
TDS concentration to be within range of historical readings for well GW -4. The TSS
concentration for well GW -4 was similar to historical readings. There were no other variances to
procedures or outlined protocols included in Appendix C of this report, except for laboratory
variances. See section 3.3.1 for further information.
8.0 REFERENCES
Atlantic Richfield, 2007. International Smelting and Refining/Carr Fork Remedial Investigation
Report. Atlantic Richfield Company. Butte Montana. May, 2007.

IS&R NPL SITE
201 Groundwater Sampling

Appendix $

'DWDEDVH6SUHDGVKHHWV
-XQH

GW-1 BR: Deep 4" Boys Ranch Well
Field Sample ID Date Collected Fraction
ISR-GW1 BR-060804 6/8/2004 Total
ISR-GW1 BR-060804 6/8/2004 Disso lved
ISR-GW1 BR-1205 12/8/2005 Total
ISR-GW1 BR-1205 12/8 /2005 Disso lved
ISR-GW1 BR-1207 12/6 /2007 Total
ISR-GW1 BR-1207 12/6/2007 Disso lved
ISR-GW1 BR-0508 5/28/2008 Total
ISR-GW1 BR-0508 5/28/2008 Disso lved
ISR-GW1BR-1108 11 /6/2008 Total
ISR-GW1BR-1108 11 /6/2008 Disso lved
ISR-GW1 BR-0509 5/27/2009 Total
ISR-GW1 BR-0509 5/27/2009 Disso lved
ISR-GW1 BR-1009 10/29/2009 Total
ISR-GW1 BR-1009 10/29/2009 Disso lved
ISR-GW1BR-0610 6/10/2010 Total
ISR-GW1BR-0610 6/10/2010 Disso lved
ISR-GW1 BR-0211 2/15/2011 Total
ISR-GW1 BR-0211 2/15/2011 Disso lved
ISR-GW1 BR-0611 6/7/2011 Total
ISR-GW1 BR-0611 6/7/2011 Disso lved
ISR-GW1 BR-1111 11 /22/2011 Total
ISR-GW1 BR-1111 11 /22/2011 Disso lved
ISR-GW1 BR-0612 6/5/2012 Total
ISR-GW1 BR-0612 6/5/2012 Disso lved
ISR-GW1 BR-1112 11/27/2012 Total
ISR-GW1 BR-1112 11 /27/2012 Disso lved
ISR-GW1 BR-130606 6/6/2013 Total
ISR-GW1 BR-130606 6/6/2013 Disso lved
Groundwater Quality Standards
GW-1: 6" Boys Ranch Well
Field Sample ID Date Collected Fraction
ISR-GW1-R1-1201 12/17/2001 Total
ISR-GW1-R1-1201 12/17/2001 Disso lved
ISR-GW1-R2-0502 5/1/2002 Total
ISR-GW1-R2-0502 5/1/2002 Disso lved
ISR-GW1 -R3-0602 6/20/2002 Total
ISR-GW1-R3-0602 6/20/2002 Disso lved
ISR-GW1-R4-0902 9/18/2002 Total
ISR-GW1-R4-0902 9/18/2002 Disso lved
Page 1 of 7
Table A-1
IS&R Groundwater Sampling Results -December 2001 through June 2013
(mg/L)
Arsenic Calcium Iron Lead Magnesium
<0 .0022 72 .3 0 .394 <0.0023 32 .8
0.00297 71.5 0 .172 <0.0023 31.9
<0 .0012 76 0 .96 <0.00 15 32
0.0031 77 0.20 <0.00 15 32
0.00038 74 3 .80 0.019 36
<0.000367 73 0.61 0.00093 35
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
<0.000299 72 0.12 0 .00073 32
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0 .011 67 0.26 0 .000087 37
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.00095 78 0.11 0 .00013 34
NIA N/A NIA NIA N/A
0.00078 86 0 .1 3 <0 .000051 34
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.0012 79 0.41 <0 .00064 30
N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA
0.00065 71 .3 0 .111 0 .00012 32
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.00052 71 .9 0.0915 0.0001 3 33 .8
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0 .0021 70 .2 0.0971 <0.001 31 .1
N/A NIA N/A N/A NIA
0 .00 19 7 1.5 0.0812 <0.001 30 .7
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.0023 74 .9 0 .216 <0.001 33 .9
N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA
0 .0015 71 .1 0 .072 <0.001 31 .5
0.05 0.015
Arsenic Calcium Iron Lead Magnesium
0.137 70 0.3 <0 .00167 35
0.139 72 <0.036 <0.00167 35
0.13 69.5 0 .56 0 .0002 33
0.14 70.1 0.55 0 .00081 34
0.14 71 .5 0.0454 <0 .00167 33 .9
0.14 7 1.1 0.0331 <0 .00167 33 .6
0.144 7 1.8 0 .256 <0 .00238 34 .8
0.141 71.4 <0.0227 <0 .00238 34.4
Alkalinity Chloride Sulfate TDS TSS
220 32 .3 139 1200 <8 .0
220 31 .7 137 480 <4 .7
210 35 .2 166 460 <5.36
220 26 .6 122 460 <6.02
220 27 .2 121 440 <6.02
210 26 11 0 450 <9 .7
210 27 120 460 <8 .1
230 28 120 440 <19
179 23 .1 11 0 387 13
220 26 .2 108 447 8
224 25 .8 11 6 384 122
230 24 .1 127 411 12
214 24 .6 123 434 <5
206 24 .6 11 2 541 <5 .0
Alkalinity Ch loride Sulfate TDS TSS
32 34 .2 126 8 2 <7.85
210 3 1 130 470 <4 .34
220 29 130 470 <4 .34
210 32 140 490 <4.34
GW-1: 6" Boys Ranch Well -Continued
Field Sample ID Date Collected Fraction
ISR-GW1-R5-1202 12/5 /2002 Total
ISR-GW1-R5-1202 12/5/2002 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-UPPER-R5-0303 3/26/2003 Total
ISR-GW1-UPPER-R5-0303 3/26/2003 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-LOWER-R5-0303 3/26/2003 Total
ISR-GW1-LOWER-R5-0303 3/26/2003 Dissolved
ISR-GW1 -0304 3/30/2004 Total
ISR-GW1-0304 3/30/2004 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-060204 6/2/2004 Total
ISR-GW1-060204 6/2/2004 Dissolved
ISR-GW1 -1205 12/7 /2005 Total
ISR-GW1 -1205 12/7/2005 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-1207 12 /10/2007 Total
ISR-GW1-1207 12 /10/2007 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-0508 5/28/2008 Total
ISR-GW1-0508 5/28/2008 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-1108 11 /6/2008 Total
ISR-GW1-1108 11 /6 /2008 Dissolved
ISR-GW1 -0509 5/28/2009 Total
ISR-GW1-0509 5/28/2009 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-1009 10/29/2009 Total
ISR-GW1-1009 10/29/2009 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-0610 6/10/2010 Total
ISR-GW1-0610 6/10/2010 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-0211 2/15/2011 Total
ISR-GW1-0211 2/15/2011 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-0611 6/8/2011 Total
ISR-GW1-0611 6/8/2011 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-1111 11/23/2011 Total
ISR-GW1-1111 11 /23/2011 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-0612 6/5/2012 Total
ISR-GW1-0612 6/5/2012 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-1112 11/28/2012 Total
ISR-GW1-1112 11 /28/2012 Dissolved
ISR-GW1-130607 6/7/2013 Total
ISR-GW1-130607 6/7/2013 Dissolved
Groundwater Quality Standards
Table A-1
IS&R Groundwater Sampling Results -December 2001 through June 2013
(mg/L)
Arsenic Calcium Iron Lead Magnesium
0.142 69.2 0.0746 <0 .00238 32 .6
0.130 63.8 <0.0227 <0 .00238 30.0
0.138 70 .8 <0 .0354 <0 .00238 33 .8
0.137 72 <0.0354 <0 .00238 35
0.143 73 .1 0.0459 <0 .00238 34 .8
0.143 72 <0.0354 <0 .00238 35
0.158 69 0 .12 <0 .00226 33
0.154 70 <0.0409 <0 .00226 33
0.139 62.8 0 .269 0 .00703 30.3
0.138 62.5 0.0819 <0 .0023 30.0
0.150 76 0 .075 <0 .00 15 34.0
0.150 77 0.26 0 .0032 34 .0
0.150 80 0 .59 0 .00071 37 .0
0.140 79 0.35 <0 .000072 37 .0
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.160 70 0 .037 0 .00042 32 .0
N/A N/A N/A N/A NI A
0.170 68 0.14 0.00011 39 .0
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.170 77 <0 .027 0 .0002 34 .0
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.180 93 0 .073 <0 .000051 37 .0
N/A NI A N/A N/A NI A
0.170 79 0 .36 <0 .00064 32.0
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.186 72 .7 <0 .050 0 .00021 33 .1
N/A N/A N/A N/A NI A
0.180 73.8 <0 .050 0 .00029 35 .8
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.140 74 .6 <0 .050 <0.001 34 .3
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.136 72.6 <0 .050 <0.001 32 .2
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.157 73.3 <0.050 <0.001 35.1
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.170 69.6 <0.050 <0.001 31.7
0.05 0.015
Note: Bold entries indicate dissolved sample concentrations which exceed the Groundwater Quality Standards
Page2of 7
Alkalinity Chloride Sulfate TDS TSS
220 32 130 490 <4.34
230 30 130 460 <7 .64
230 30 130 460 <7 .64
220 32 .6 131 450 <8 .00
230 37 .8 123 490 36
220 33 .9 138 470 <4 .7
210 33 .9 129 470 <5.36
220 28 .9 11 6 460 <6.02
220 30 .5 127 470 7 .0
210 29 120 470 <9 .7
210 30 130 460 <8 .1
220 30 120 440 <19
201 28 .1 131 446 5
236 24.4 11 6 463 <5
222 30 .9 141 435 <5
236 26 .7 131 420 7
210 25.2 11 7 437 <5
204 24 .8 106 418 10
GW-3A: NW Property Corner Well
Field Sample ID Date Collected Fraction
ISR-GW3A-R3-0702 7/8/2002 Total
ISR-GW3A-R3-0702 7/8/2002 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-R4-0902 9/20/2002 To tal
ISR-GW3A-R4-0902 9/20/2002 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-R5-1202 12/4 /2002 Total
ISR-GW3A-R5-1202 12/4/2002 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-R5-0303 3/25/2003 Total
ISR-GW3A-R5-0303 3/25/2003 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-1205 12/7/2005 Total
ISR-GW3A-1205 12/7/2005 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-1207 12/3/2007 Total
ISR-GW3A-1207 12/3 /2007 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-0508 6/2/2008 Total
ISR-GW3A-0508 6/2/2008 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-1108 11 /5/2008 Total
ISR-GW3A-1108 11 /5 /2008 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-0509 6/2/2009 Total
ISR-GW3A-0509 6/2/2009 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-1009 10/26/2009 Total
ISR-GW3A-1009 10/26/2009 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-0610 6/8/2010 Total
ISR-GW3A-0610 6/8/2010 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-0611 6/6/2011 Total
ISR-GW3A-0611 6/6/2011 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-1011 10/26/2011 Total
ISR-GW3A-1011 10/26/2011 D isso lved
ISR-GW3A-0612 6/7/2012 Total
ISR-GW3A-0612 6/7/2012 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-1012 10/31 /2012 Total
ISR-GW3A-1012 10/31 /2012 Disso lved
ISR-GW3A-130605 6/5/2013 Total
ISR-GW3A-130605 6/5/2013 Disso lved
Groundwater Quality Standards
GW-4: Tailings Dam Well
Field Sample ID Date Collected Fraction
ISR-GW4-R2-0402 4/17/2002 Total
ISR-GW4-R2-0402 4/17/2002 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-R3-0602 6/19/2002 Total
ISR-GW4-R3-0602 6/19/2002 Disso lved
Page 3 of 7
Table A-1
IS&R Groundwater Sampling Results -December 2001 through June 2013
(mg/L)
Arsenic Calcium Iron Lead Magnesium
<0 .00279 78 .6 0 .263 0 .01 14 31 .9
<0.00279 76.6 <0.0227 0 .00421 31.2
<0 .00209 78 .8 1.01 <0 .00238 32.4
<0.00209 77.4 0.0936 <0 .00238 32.0
0.00408 75 .5 2.83 <0 .00238 30 .3
<0.00209 75.0 0 .112 <0 .00238 30.2
0.00834 78 .3 2 .90 <0 .00238 31 .5
0.00322 76.8 0.0947 <0 .00238 31.0
0 .013 82 6 .8 <0 .00 15 31 .0
0.00140 80 0.11 <0 .00 15 31.0
0.02400 72 11 0 .0041 31.0
0.00059 75 0.51 0 .000097 34 .0
NI A N/A NI A NIA N/A
<0.000299 74 0 .046 0 .0002 30.0
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.00098 73 0.17 0 .00011 37 .0
N/A N/A N/A N/A NI A
0.00097 84 0 .078 0 .000058 33 .0
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.00087 92 0.11 0 .000057 34 .0
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.00094 87 0.4 <0 .00064 30 .0
N/A NI A N/A N/A NI A
0.00085 77 .2 0.0626 0 .00018 33 .1
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.00 11 76 .1 0 .143 <0.001 30 .6
N/A N/A N/A N/A NI A
0 .0018 74 .8 0.0537 <0.001 29.1
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0 .00 11 71.2 <0 .05 <0.001 29.4
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.00 11 70.4 <0.05 <0.001 28.2
0.05 0.015
Arsenic Calcium Iron Lead Magnesium
<0.000352 90 .8 0 .78 0 .00077 36
<0.000352 85.7 0.56 0 .0014 37
<0.00279 86.1 2.79 <0 .00167 33.9
<0.00279 85.1 0.0792 <0 .00167 33.6
Alkalinity Chloride Sulfate TDS TSS
270 56 68 4 70 <4 .34
280 53 73 470 <4 .34
280 54 7 1 480 15
290 5 1 69 460 <7 .64
280 54 .6 71 .3 470 24
270 55 .1 71.5 470 23
280 49 .2 66.2 460 27
280 52 69.7 460 30
270 53 74 460 <8 .9
280 49 64 480 12
280 52 69 480 <19
285 45 63.2 483 10
290 49 70.7 414 6
292 45 .7 69.7 453 2 0
265 47 .6 70.1 233 6
262 45 .5 65 444 <5 .0
Alkalinity Ch loride Sulfate TDS TSS
220 34 180 570 <4 .34
220 33 160 540 <4.34
GW-4: Tailings Dam Well -Continued
Field Sample ID Date Collected Fraction
ISR-GW4-R4-0902 9/18/2 002 Total
ISR-GW4-R4-0902 9/18/2002 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-R5-1202 12/4 /2002 Total
ISR-GW4-R5-1202 12/4 /2002 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-1205 12/9 /2005 Total
ISR-GW4-1205 12/9/2005 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-1207 12/4 /2007 Total
ISR-GW4-1207 12/4 /2007 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-0508 5/22/2008 Total
ISR-GW4-0508 5/22/2008 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-1108 11 /3 /2008 Total
ISR-GW4-1108 11 /3 /2008 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-0509 5/26/2009 Total
ISR-GW4-0509 5/26/2009 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-1009 10/27/2009 Total
ISR-GW4-1009 10/27/2009 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-0610 6/9/2010 Total
ISR-GW4-0610 6/9/2010 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-1210 12 /10/2010 Total
ISR-GW4-1210 12 /10/2010 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-0611 6/7/2011 Total
ISR-GW4-0611 6/7/2011 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-1111 11 /21 /2011 Total
ISR-GW4-1111 11 /21 /2011 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-0612 6/4/2012 Total
ISR-GW4-0612 6/4/2012 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-1112 11 /26/2012 Total
ISR-GW4-1112 11/26/2012 Disso lved
ISR-GW4-130604 6/4/2013 Total
ISR-GW4-130604 6/4/2013 Disso lved
Groundwater Quality Standards
GW-7: Analytical Model Flow Line from Boys Ranch Well
Field Sample ID Date Collected Fraction
ISR-GW7-062204 6/22/2004 Total
ISR-GW7-062204 6/22 /2004 Disso lved
ISR-GW7-1205 12/6/2005 Total
ISR-GW7-1205 12/6/2005 Disso lved
ISR-GW7-1207 12 /11/2007 Total
ISR-GW7-1207 12 /11 /2007 Disso lved
Page4of7
Table A-1
IS&R Groundwater Sampling Results -December 2001 through June 2013
(mg/L)
Arsenic Calcium Iron Lead Magnesium
0.00251 86 .3 0 .122 <0 .00238 29.9
<0.00209 86.5 0.0402 <0 .00238 35.9
<0 .00209 76 .1 2 .1 0 <0 .00238 30.7
<0.00209 80.6 <0.0227 <0 .00238 32.5
0.0025 82 0.10 0 .0027 32
0 .00 14 79 0 .029 0 .0015 3 1
0.00067 75 0 .57 0 .00057 34
0.00045 75 0.47 0 .00039 33
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
<0.000299 75 0 .058 0 .0011 30
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0 .00 12 69 0.12 0 .00042 35
NIA N/A NIA NIA N/A
0.00095 80 0 .047 0 .00019 32
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.00 11 91 0 .073 0 .00014 33
N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA
0 .00 13 82 0 .28 <0 .00064 28
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.00 12 74 0.62 <0 .00064 34
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.00088 72 .4 <0 .050 0 .00027 31 .3
NA NA NA NA NA
0 .002 69.1 <0 .050 0 .0038 27.7
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.00 17 71 .8 <0 .050 <0.001 28.1
N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA
0 .0018 77.4 <0.050 <0.001 32 .2
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0 .00 17 72.5 <0 .050 <0.001 29.4
0.05 0.015
Arsenic Calcium Iron Lead Magnesium
0.174 66.1 0 .239 0 .00258 31.6
0.171 64.5 0.0959 <0 .0023 31.4
0.13 76 3.0 <0 .00 15 33
0.11 75 0 .83 <0 .00 15 33
0.10 75 1.2 0 .0002 34
0.097 76 0.97 <0 .000072 35
Alkalinity Chloride Sulfate TDS TSS
220 35 170 530 <4.34
220 35 160 530 <4.34
210 40.4 146 510 <4 .7
200 4 1.3 14 1 500 <5 .36
210 36 .9 127 500 <6 .02
210 41 .8 134 480 <6 .02
200 40 130 480 <9 .7
200 42 120 480 <8 .1
220 44 130 470 <19
200 52 140 470 <19
198 38 .8 126 491 11
190 45 .9 129 448 38
238 36 .5 142 441 <5
191 37 .5 138 434 47
193 36 .8 124 447 7
Alkalinity Ch loride Sulfate TDS TSS
230 31 .0 124 490 <8 .0
220 32.4 135 460 7 .0
210 29 122 450 <5 .36
GW-7: Analytical Model Flow Line from Boys Ranch Well -Continued
Field Sample ID Date Collected Fraction
ISR-GW7-0508 5/29/2008 Total
ISR-GW7-0508 5/29/2008 Dissolved
ISR-GW7-1108 11 /7/2008 Total
ISR-GW7-1108 11 /7/2008 Dissolved
ISR-GW7-0509 5/28/2009 Total
ISR-GW7-0509 5/28/2009 Dissolved
ISR-GW7-1009 10/30/2009 Total
ISR-GW7-1009 10/30/2009 Dissolved
ISR-GW7-0610 6/11/2010 Total
ISR-GW7-0610 6/11/2010 Dissolved
ISR-GW7-0211 2/16/2011 Total
ISR-GW7-0211 2/16/2011 Dissolved
ISR-GW7-0611 6/8/2011 Total
ISR-GW7-0611 6/8/2011 Dissolved
ISR-GW7-1111 11 /23/2011 Total
ISR-GW7-1111 11 /23/2011 Dissolved
ISR-GW7-0612 6/6/2012 Total
ISR-GW7-0612 6/6/2012 Dissolved
ISR-GW7-1112 11/28/2012 Total
ISR-GW7-1112 11/28/2012 Dissolved
ISR-GW7-130607 6/7/2013 Total
ISR-GW7-130607 6/7/2013 Dissolved
Groundwater Quality Standards
Table A-1
IS&R Groundwater Sampling Results -December 2001 through June 2013
(mg/L)
Arsenic Calcium Iron Lead Magnesium
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.089 69 0.59 0.00021 32
N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A
0.088 66 0.77 <0.000051 38
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.081 75 0.83 0.000061 34
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.092 87 0.47 <0 .000051 35
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.09 79 0.77 <0 .00064 30
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.0603 71.2 0 .868 <0 .00010 33.2
NIA N/A NI A NIA N/A
0.0544 67.8 0 .834 0 .00011 33 .6
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.0189 69.4 0.468 <0.001 33.4
N/A N/A N/A N/A NI A
0.0626 71 .3 1.17 <0.001 31.2
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.0982 70.8 0 .748 <0.001 33.6
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.075 66.9 0 .984 <0.001 31 .7
0.05 0.015
Note: Bold entries indicate dissolved sample concentrations which exceed the Groundwater Quality Standards
GW-8: Hydraulic Model Flow Line from Boys Ranch Well
Field Sample ID Date Collected Fraction Arsenic Calcium Iron Lead Magnesium
ISR-GW8-062904 6/29/2004 Total 0.166 69.5 0 .288 <0.0023 30.4
ISR-GW8-062904 6/29/2004 Dissolved 0.166 68.6 0 .187 <0 .0023 30 .0
ISR-GW8-1205 12/6/2005 Total 0.14 74 0 .65 0 .0016 30 .0
ISR-GW8-1205 12/6/2005 Dissolved 0.13 75 0.45 <0 .00 15 31.0
ISR-GW8-1207 12 /12/2007 Total 0.10 72 2.7 0 .0015 32 .0
ISR-GW8-1207 12 /12/2007 Dissolved 0.10 74 2 .2 0 .00069 32.0
ISR-GW8-0508 5/30/2008 Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ISR-GW8-0508 5/30/2008 Dissolved 0.097 66 1.0 0.00014 29.0
ISR-GW8-1108 11 /7/2008 Total N/A NI A N/A N/A N/A
ISR-GW8-1108 11 /7/2008 Dissolved 0.099 62 0.8 0 .000076 34 .0
ISR-GW8-0509 5/29/2009 Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ISR-GW8-0509 5/29/2009 Dissolved 0.100 74 0.35 0 .00011 31.0
ISR-GW8-1009 10/28/2009 Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 5 of 7
Alkalinity Chloride Sulfate TDS TSS
220 26 .7 11 4 440 <6.02
220 27 .8 119 450 <6 .02
210 27 11 0 450 <9 .7
210 28 120 450 11
220 28 120 440 <19
194 29 .3 124 414 10
224 26 .9 11 4 447 13
208 28 .8 132 411 56
236 25 .1 130 445 12
203 24 .7 11 3 423 5
206 23 .5 99.3 394 27
Alkalinity Chloride Sulfate TDS TSS
230 22 .5 104 430 <8.00
220 26 .3 11 2 430 <4 .7
220 22 .5 93 .9 400 <5 .36
220 20 .3 87.7 390 <6 .02
220 21 .3 92.8 400 <6.02
210 20 89 390 <9 .7
210 20 85 390 <8 .1
GW-8: Hydraulic Model Flow Line from Boys Ranch Well -Continued
Field Sample ID Date Collected Fraction
ISR-GW8-1009 10/28/2009 D isso lved
ISR-GW8-0610 6/11 /2010 Total
ISR-GW8 -0610 6/11 /2010 Disso lved
ISR-GW8-0211 2/16/2011 Total
ISR-GW8-0211 2/16/2011 Disso lved
ISR-GW8-0611 6/8/2011 Total
ISR-GW8-0611 6/8/2011 Disso lved
ISR-GW8-1111 11 /28/2011 Total
ISR-GW8-1111 11 /28/2011 Disso lved
ISR-GW8-0612 6/6/2012 Total
ISR-GW8-0612 6/6/2012 Disso lved
ISR-GW8 -1112 11 /29/201 2 Total
ISR-GW8-1112 11 /29/2012 Disso lved
ISR-GW8-130607 6/7/2013 Total
ISR-GW8-130607 6/7/2013 Disso lved
Groundwater Quality Standards
Table A-1
IS&R Groundwater Sampling Results -December 2001 through June 2013
(mg/L)
Arsen ic Calcium Iron Lea d Magnesium
0.110 86 0 .2 9 <0 .000051 33 .0
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0 .097 75 0 .44 <0 .00064 28.0
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.097 68.9 0 .14 <0 .00010 30.1
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.0806 67.9 0 .1 6 0 .00017 32 .0
NA NA NA NA NA
0.0726 75 .6 0 .167 <0.001 33.6
NA NA NA NA NA
0.0675 63.3 0 .141 <0.001 27.4
NA NA NA NA NA
0 .0725 67.3 0 .124 <0.00 1 30 .4
NA NA NA NA NA
0.0674 62.8 0 .122 <0.001 28.3
0.05 0.015
Note: Bold entries ind icate dissolved sample concentrat ions which e xceed the Groundwater Quality Standards
GW-11 Elton Tunnel Dump Well
Field Sample ID Date Collected Fraction Arsenic Calcium Iron Lead Magnesium
ISR-GW11-0206-TMID 2/14/2006 Total <0.0027 79 1.1 <0.00 19 37
ISR-GW11-0206-TMID 2/14/2006 Disso lved <0 .0027 77 0 .2 3 <0 .00 19 36
ISR-GW11-0206-MID (HKM) 2/14/2006 Total 0.0012 367 80.7 0 .505 0.0017527 40.5
ISR-GW11-0206-MID (HKM) 2/14/2006 Disso lved 0 .0009782 86.2 0 .021 <0 .000085 42.4
ISR-GW11-0207 12/5 /2007 Total 0.00042 80 4 .3 0 .0032 4 3
ISR-GW11 -0207 12/5 /2007 Disso lved <0.000367 79 0 .50 0 .00021 44
ISR-GW11-0508 5/23/2008 Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ISR-GW11-0508 5/23/2008 Disso lved <0.000299 66 0 .05 0 .00055 37
ISR-GW11-1108 11 /4 /2008 Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ISR-GW11-1108 11 /4 /2008 Disso lved 0.00082 70 0 .16 0 .0002 44
ISR-GW11-0509 5/27/2009 Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ISR-GW11-0509 5/27/2009 Disso lved 0.00098 81 <0 .027 0 .00017 39
ISR-GW11-1009 10/28/2 009 Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ISR-GW11-1009 10/28/2009 Disso lved 0.00068 95 0 .078 <0 .000051 42
ISR-GW11 -0611 6/23/2011 Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ISR-GW11-0611 6/23/2011 Disso lved 0.00051 77.3 0 .218 <0 .00010 34.1
ISR-GW11-1111 11 /28/2011 Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ISR-GW11-1111 11 /28/2011 Disso lved 0.0021 79.9 <0.050 <0.001 39.8
ISR-GW11-0612 6/4/2012 Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ISR-GW11-0612 6/4/2012 Disso lved 0.0023 75.9 <0.050 <0.001 35.9
Page6of7
Alkalinity Ch loride Sulfate TDS TSS
220 22 88 390 <19
209 20 .8 102 3 70 <5
220 20 .2 8 2.6 3 52 13
214 31 .6 135 4 30 5
2 30 20 .1 88.6 370 10
209 18 .3 84 355 21
2 19 17 .5 74.8 353 16
Alkalinity Ch loride Sulfate TDS TSS
220 32.2 166 500 83
224 30 162 503 6 2
220 35 .4 168 530 25
22 0 29 .5 15 1 N/A 8
2 30 32 .1 156 520 <6.0 2
230 30 150 520 <9 .7
220 3 1 150 530 14
2 39 28 .6 163 52 1 *1580
2 38 37 .7 196 519 7
2 56 28 .5 175 4 94 11
GW-11 Elton Tunne l Dump Well -Continued
Field Sample ID Date Collected Fraction
ISR-GW11-1112 11 /27/2012 To t al
ISR-GW11-11 12 11 /27/2012 Disso lved
ISR-GW11-130605 6/5/2013 Total
ISR-GW11-130605 6/5/2013 Disso lved
Groundwater Quality Standards
GW-11 cou ld not be sampled in June 2010 due to sediment in the well.
Field Sample ID Date Collected Fraction
*ISR-GW32A-130605 6/5/2013 Total
*ISR-GW32A-130605 6/5/2013 Disso lved
~ISR-GW1 EB-130607 6/7/2013 Total
~ISR-GW1 EB-130607 6/7/2013 Disso lved
NOTE: (*) Fie ld Duplicate
NOTE: (~) Fie ld Equipment Blank
Page 7 of 7
Table A-1
IS&R Groundwater Sampling Results -December 2001 through June 2013
(mg/L)
Arsenic Calcium Iron Lead Magnesium
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0 .0035 79 .5 <0 .050 <0 .001 40 .5
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.0028 75.4 <0.050 <0.001 36.8
0.05 0.015
* Well was purged using a ba ile r.
2012 Fie ld QC Data
Arsenic Calcium Iron Lead Magnesium
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.0012 79.2 <0.050 <0.001 31.1
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
<0.00 1 <0 .100 <0.050 <0.001 <0.050
Alkalinity Chloride Sulfate TDS TSS
219 29 166 498 <5
220 28.9 152 544 ND
Alkalinity Chloride Sulfate TDS TSS
265 44.9 64.7 421 <5.0
<20.0 <1.0 <1.0 16 <5.0

IS&R Groundwater Laboratory QC Results - GW-4, GW-11, GW-3A, GW32A, GW1BR, GW1, GW1EB, GW7, GW8
Results in mg/l unless otherwise noted
Laboratory Control Sample
Description Calcium* Iron* Magnesium* Arsenic* Lead*
QC Sample 1204779 1204779 1204779 1204958 1204958
Date 6/17/2013 6/17/2013 6/17/2013 6/17/2013 6/17/2013
Target 10000 10000 10000 40 40
Result 10100 10300 9960 41.4 40.9
% Recovery 101 103 99.6 103 102
QC Limits 80-120 80-120 80-120 80-120 80-120
*Results in ug/L
Lab Preparation Blanks
Description Calcium*Iron* Magnesium*Arsenic*Lead*
QC Sample 1204778 1204778 1204778 1204957 1204957
Date 6/17/2013 6/17/2013 6/17/2013 6/17/2013 6/17/2013
Result ND ND ND ND ND
RL 100 50 50 1 1
*Results in ug/L
Table A-QC (page 1 of 8)

IS&R Groundwater Laboratory QC Results - GW-4, GW-11, GW-3A, GW-32A, GW-1BR, GW-1, GW-1EB, GW-7, GW-8
Lab Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicates
Description Calcium* Iron* Magnesium* Arsenic* Lead*
MS Sample 1204780 1204780 1204780 1204959 1204959
MSD Sample 1204781 1204781 1204781 1204960 1204960
Date 6/17/2013 6/17/2013 6/17/2013 6/17/2013 6/17/2013
Sample Result 121000 11000 16700 1.7 ND
Sample Result D. 121000 11000 16700 1.7 ND
MS Spike 10000 10000 10000 40 40
MSD Spike 10000 10000 10000 40 40
MS Result 129000 20400 25600 43.6 42
MSD Result 127000 20200 25500 42.8 41.3
MS % Rec 81 94 89 105 105
MSD % Rec 54 92 87 103 103
% Rec Limit 75-125 75-125 75-125 75-125 75-125
RPD MS 0.769 1.449 2.103 2.227 2.439
RPD MSD 1.550 1.942 2.299 1.302 1.599
Max RPD 20 20 20 20 20
*Results in ug/L Qualifier: M1
Value outside % Rec Limits
Table A-QC (page 2 of 8)

IS&R Groundwater Laboratory QC Results - GW-4, GW-11, GW-3A, GW-32A, GW-1BR, GW-1, GW-7, GW-8
Laboratory Control Sample Lab Preparation Blanks
Description Chloride Chloride Sulfate Description Chloride Sulfate
QC Sample 1207040 1208482 1207040 QC Sample 1207039 1207039
Date 6/19/2013 6/19/2013 6/19/2013 Date 6/19/2013 6/19/2013
Target 5 5 5 Result ND ND
Result 4.8 4.8 4.8 RL 1 1
% Recovery 96 97 96 *Results in mg/L
QC Limits 90-110 90-110 90-110
*Results in mg/L
IS&R Groundwater Laboratory QC Results - GW-4, GW-11, GW-3A, GW-32A
Laboratory Control Sample Sample Duplicate
Description TDS Description TDS TDS TSS TSS
QC Sample 1203734 QC Sample 1203735 1203736 1203413 1203419
Date 6/12/2013 Date 6/12/2013 6/12/2013 6/12/2013 6/12/2013
Target 1000 Result 2450 4090
ND 32
Result 947 DUP Result 2860 2970
ND 30
% Recovery 95 RPD 15 32 0 6
QC Limits 80-120 MAX RPD 17 17 25 25
*Results in mg/L *Results in mg/L Qualifier: D6
Value Greater than MAX RPD
Lab Preparation Blanks
Description TDS TSS
QC Sample 1203733 1203411
Date 6/12/2013 6/12/2013
Result ND ND
RL 5 5
*Results in mg/L
Table A-QC (page 3 of 8)

IS&R Groundwater Laboratory QC Results - GW-4
Laboratory Control Sample Sample Duplicate Lab Preparation Blanks
Description Alkalinity Description Alkalinity Alkalinity Description Alkalinity
QC Sample 1203891 QC Sample 1203894 1203895 QC Sample 1203890
Date 6/13/2013 Date 6/13/2013 6/13/2013 Date 6/13/2013
Target 500 Result 135 549 Result ND
Result 453 DUP Result 141 558 RL 20
% Recovery 91 RPD 4 2 *Results in mg/L
QC Limits 90-110 MAX RPD 10 10
*Results in mg/L *Results in mg/L
Lab Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicates
Description Chloride Sulfate
MS Sample 1207041 1207041
MSD Sample 1207042 1207042
Date 6/20/2013 6/20/2013
Sample Result 36.8 124
Sample Result D. 36.8 124
MS Spike 50 50
MSD Spike 50 50
MS Result 80.1 172
MSD Result 85 178
MS % Rec 86 94
MSD % Rec 96 108
% Rec Limit 64-118 61-119
RPD MS 4.014 0.578
RPD MSD 1.048 1.136
Max RPD 12 10
*Results in mg/L
Table A-QC (page 4 of 8)

IS&R Groundwater Laboratory QC Results - GW-11, GW-3A, GW-32A, GW-1BR
Laboratory Control Sample Sample Duplicate Lab Preparation Blanks
Description Alkalinity Description Alkalinity Alkalinity Description Alkalinity
QC Sample 1204689 QC Sample 1204692 1204693 QC Sample 1204688
Date 6/14/2013 Date 6/14/2013 6/14/2013 Date 6/14/2013
Target 500 Result 648 379 Result ND
Result 456 DUP Result 654 384 RL 20
% Recovery 91 RPD 1 1 *Results in mg/L
QC Limits 90-110 MAX RPD 10 10
*Results in mg/L *Results in mg/L
IS&R Groundwater Laboratory QC Results - GW-11, GW-1BR, GW-1, GW-7, GW-8
Lab Preparation Blanks
Description Chloride
QC Sample 1208481
Date 6/20/2013
Result ND
RL 1
*Results in mg/L
IS&R Groundwater Laboratory QC Results - GW-1BR, GW-1, GW-1EB, GW-7, GW-8
Laboratory Control Sample Sample Duplicate Lab Preparation Blanks
Description TDS Description TDS TDS Description TDS
QC Sample 1204421 QC Sample 1204422 1204423 QC Sample 1204420
Date 6/13/2013 Date 6/13/2013 6/13/2013 Date 6/13/2013
Target 1000 Result 192 10900 Result ND
Result 959 DUP Result 178 8800 RL 5
% Recovery 96 RPD 8 21 *Results in mg/L
QC Limits 80-120 MAX RPD 17 17
*Results in mg/L *Results in mg/L Qualifier: D6
Value Greater than MAX RPD
Table A-QC (page 5 of 8)

IS&R Groundwater Laboratory QC Results - GW-1BR
Sample Duplicate Lab Preparation Blanks
Description TSS TSS Description TSS
QC Sample 1204199 1204200 QC Sample 1204198
Date 6/13/2013 6/13/2013 Date 6/13/2013
Result 5 8 Result ND
DUP Result 6 6 RL 5
RPD 18 29 *Results in mg/L
MAX RPD 25 25
*Results in mg/L Qualifier: D6
Value Greater than MAX RPD
IS&R Groundwater Laboratory QC Results - GW-1, GW-1EB, GW-7, GW-8
Laboratory Control Sample Sample Duplicate
Description Alkalinity Description TSS TSS Alkalinity Alkalinity
QC Sample 1206019 QC Sample 1205084 1205085 1206022 1206023
Date 6/17/2013 Date 6/14/2013 6/14/2013 6/17/2013 6/17/2013
Target 500 Result 18 16 204 339
Result 471 DUP Result 15 13 218 341
% Recovery 94 RPD 18 21 7 1
QC Limits 90-110 MAX RPD 25 25 10 10
*Results in mg/L *Results in mg/L
Lab Preparation Blanks
Description TSS Alkalinity
QC Sample 1205083 1206018
Date 6/14/2013 6/17/2013
Result ND ND
RL 5 20
*Results in mg/L
Table A-QC (page 6 of 8)

IS&R Groundwater Laboratory QC Results - GW-1EB
Laboratory Control Sample Lab Preparation Blanks
Description Chloride Sulfate Description Chloride Sulfate
QC Sample 1208484 1208484 QC Sample 1208483 1208483
Date 6/21/2013 6/21/2013 Date 6/21/2013 6/21/2013
Target 5 5 Result ND ND
Result 4.9 5.2 RL 1 1
% Recovery 99 104 *Results in mg/L
QC Limits 90-110 90-110
*Results in mg/L
Lab Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicates Lab Matrix Spike
Description Chloride Sulfate Description Chloride Sulfate
MS Sample 1208485 1208485 MS Sample 1208487 1208487
MSD Sample 1208486 1208486 Date 6/21/2013 6/21/2013
Date 6/21/2013 6/21/2013 Sample Result 20.1 27.8
Sample Result 5.3 1.8 MS Spike 10 10
Sample Result D. 5.3 1.8 MS Result 30.6 38.4
MS Spike 5 5 MS % Rec 105 105
MSD Spike 5 5 % Rec Limit 64-118 61-119
MS Result 10.4 6.9
MSD Result 10.2 6.7
MS % Rec 102 102
MSD % Rec 98 98
% Rec Limit 64-118 61-119
RPD MS 0.483 0.730
RPD MSD 0.488 0.741
Max RPD 12 10
*Results in mg/L
Table A-QC (page 7 of 8)

IS&R Groundwater Laboratory QC Results - GW-8
Lab Matrix Spike
Description Chloride Sulfate
MS Sample 1207043 1207043
Date 6/20/2013 6/20/2013
Sample Result 17.5 74.8
MS Spike 10 50
MS Result 26.5 118
MS % Rec 90 86
% Rec Limit 64-118 61-119
*Results in mg/L
Table A-QC (page 8 of 8)

IS&R NPL SITE
201 Groundwater Sampling

Appendix %

Groundwater Sampling Log Sheets
-XQH 201

Location: Northing____________________ Easting____________________
Horizontal Accuracy (ft): Surface Elevation: Sampler: KC
Sample Designation Number
(Attach Sample Label Here)
Sounding Device: Electronic water level meter
Chain of Custody No:
Meter Type:Horiba U-22 Container Preserv. Analysis
Time Pumping Rate (gpm) Vol Pumped pH Cond. (mS/m) DO (mg/L) Temp (C) TDS (g/L) Turbity ORP (mV) Type
1240 3 30 ---14.99 -252 164
1250 3 60 ---15.18 -204 160 1x 500 mL HNO3 dissolved metals
1300 3 90 - - - 15.26 - 131 179 HDPE
1310 3 120 - - - 15.3 - 108 182
1320 3 150 - - - 15.22 - 62.3 170 1x 500 mL N/A anions/phys. Prop.
1330 3 180 - - - 15.31 - 54.6 175 HDPE
1340 3 210 - - - 15.34 - 55.4 175
1343 3 219 - - - 15.35 - 55.7 176
1346 3 228 - - - 15.38 - 55 175
1350 3 240 - - - 15.43 - 53 176
1355 3 255
Notes: The Horiba water quality meter pH, DO and TDS sensors malfunctioned and a replacement meter was requested. Well stabilization determined by temperature, turbidity and ORP
Groundwater Sampling Log Sheet Well Number: GW-4
Well Name: _______________
Date: 6/4/2013
Description of Well (condition, etc.):
Well Casing Inner Diameter (di): 0.5 (in feet)
Casing Type: Steel
Screen Type and Length: Steel slotted 129' ISR-GW4-130604
Depth to Water (H): ___685.0______________ (in feet)
Total Well Depth (TD): 738.00___________ (in feet)
Source of Depth Information (records, sounding, etc): Records
Casing Volume [(Vc) = (di/2)2 (TD-H)]: in ft3 10.41 cuft (77.84 gal)
Calculated Purge Volume [(Vc)(7.48)(3)]: in gallons 233.52 gal
Purging Device (type of pump, or other): Electric submersible pump
If Pump, Pumping Rate: 3.0 gpm
Water Quality Measurements
Collected Sample ISR-GW4-130604 @ 1355
,__
ANDERSON
l,HGINllRlNG COMPANY INC .
---------------------------------
---
---------------------------------
Location: Northing____________________ Easting____________________
Horizontal Accuracy (ft): Surface Elevation: Sampler: KC
Sample Designation Number
(Attach Sample Label Here)
Sounding Device: Electronic water level meter
Chain of Custody No:
Meter Type:Horiba U-22 Container Preserv. Analysis
Time Pumping Rate (gpm) Vol Pumped pH Cond. (mS/m) DO (mg/L) Temp (C) TDS (g/L) Turbity ORP (mV) Type
1117 2.7 164.7 6.74 0.798 15.4 9.9 45
1120 2.7 172.8 6.82 0.797 15.4 8.7 42 1x 500 mL HNO3 dissolved metals
1123 2.7 180.9 6.91 0.796 15.4 7.3 35 HDPE
1125 2.7 186.3 6.96 0.796 15.4 7.4 33
1127 2.7 191.7 7 0.795 15.4 6.4 32 1x 500 mL N/A anions/phys. Prop.
1130 2.7 199.8 7.05 0.795 15.4 6.4 32 HDPE
1135 2.7 213.3
Groundwater Sampling Log Sheet Well Number: GW-11
Well Name: _______________
Date: 6/5/2013
Description of Well (condition, etc.):
Well Casing Inner Diameter (di): 0.5 (in feet)
Casing Type: Steel
Screen Type and Length: Steel slotted ISR-GW11-130605
Depth to Water (H): ___700.0______________ (in feet)
Notes: Horiba water quality meter replaced following sampling event at well GW-4 due to a misfunction with pH, DO and TDS sensors. Detected errors in new Horiba water quaility meter; DO sensor was registering 0.0 and TDS sensor was
not installed by company supplying meter. DO and TDS measurements for stabilization is not required per SOP 4-9, therefore proceeded to use Horiba water quality monitor replacement following sampling at well GW-4.
Total Well Depth (TD): 742__________ (in feet)
Source of Depth Information (records, sounding, etc): Records
Casing Volume [(Vc) = (di/2)2 (TD-H)]: in ft3 8.25 cuft (61.69 gal)
Calculated Purge Volume [(Vc)(7.48)(3)]: in gallons 185 gal
Purging Device (type of pump, or other): Electric submersible pump
If Pump, Pumping Rate: 2.7 gpm
Water Quality Measurements
Collected Sample ISR-GW11-130605 @ 1135
~
ANDERSON
lNGIN£1RI N G (Olfi,!l"ANT I NC .,
---------------------------------
---
---------------------------------
---
Location: Northing____________________ Easting____________________
Horizontal Accuracy (ft): Surface Elevation: Sampler: KC
Sample Designation Number
(Attach Sample Label Here)
Sounding Device: Electronic water level meter
Chain of Custody No:
Meter Type:Horiba U-22 Container Preserv. Analysis
Time Pumping Rate (gpm) Vol Pumped pH Cond. (mS/m) DO (mg/L) Temp (C) TDS (g/L) Turbity ORP (mV) Type
1535 3.5 49 6.73 0.744 16..2 364 78
1540 3.5 66.5 6.97 0.747 16 261 45 1x 500 mL HNO3 dissolved metals
1545 3.5 84 7.07 0.75 16.1 201 43 HDPE
1550 3.5 101.5 7.11 0.752 16.2 182 45
1555 3.5 119 7.15 0.755 16.1 137 47 1x 500 mL N/A anions/phys. Prop.
1600 3.5 136.5 7.18 0.756 16.2 87.3 48 HDPE
1603 3.5 147
1606 3.5 157.5
Groundwater Sampling Log Sheet Well Number: GW-3A
Well Name: _______________
Date: 6/5/2013
Description of Well (condition, etc.):
Well Casing Inner Diameter (di): 0.5 (in feet)
Casing Type: Steel
Screen Type and Length: Steel slotted ISR-GW3A-130605
Depth to Water (H): ___619.5______________ (in feet)ISR-GW32A-130605
Notes: Horiba water quality meter replaced following sampling event at well GW-4 due to a misfunction with pH, DO and TDS sensors. Detected errors in new Horiba water quaility meter; DO sensor was registering 0.0 and TDS sensor was
Collected Sample ISR-GW32A-130605 @ 1606
Total Well Depth (TD): 643.5___________ (in feet)
Source of Depth Information (records, sounding, etc): Records
Casing Volume [(Vc) = (di/2)2 (TD-H)]: in ft3 4.71 (35.25 gal)
Calculated Purge Volume [(Vc)(7.48)(3)]: in gallons 105.75 gal
Purging Device (type of pump, or other): Electric submersible pump
If Pump, Pumping Rate: 3.5 gpm
Water Quality Measurements
Collected Sample ISR-GW3A-130605 @ 1603
~
ANDERSON
lNGIN£1RI N G (Olfi,!l"ANT I NC .,
---------------------------------
---
---------------------------------
----
Location: Northing____________________ Easting____________________
Horizontal Accuracy (ft): Surface Elevation: Sampler: KC
Sample Designation Number
(Attach Sample Label Here)
Sounding Device: Electronic water level meter
Chain of Custody No:
Meter Type:Horiba U-22 Container Preserv. Analysis
Time Pumping Rate (gpm) Vol Pumped pH Cond. (mS/m) DO (mg/L) Temp (C) TDS (g/L) Turbity ORP (mV) Type
1225 3.4 20.4 6.4 0.538 -15.8 -30.1 -215
1235 3.4 54.4 7.27 0.44 -15.7 -126 -195 1x 500 mL HNO3 dissolved metals
1245 3.4 88.4 7.23 0.669 - 15.5 - 345 -52 HDPE
1255 3.4 122.4 7.25 0.689 - 15 - 60 -44
1305 3.4 156.4 7.28 0.694 - 15.7 - 31.1 -49 1x 500 mL N/A anions/phys. Prop.
1315 3.4 190.4 7.32 0.696 - 15.6 - 29.8 -48 HDPE
1325 3.4 224.4 7.36 0.697 - 15.7 - 27.7 -46
1335 3.4 258.4 7.39 0.697 - 15.7 - 27.7 -46
1345 3.4 292.4 7.42 0.697 - 15.7 - 20.4 -41
1348 3.4 302.6
Notes: Horiba water quality meter replaced following sampling event at well GW-4 due to a misfunction with pH, DO and TDS sensors. Detected errors in new Horiba water quaility meter; DO sensor was registering 0.0 and TDS sensor was
Groundwater Sampling Log Sheet Well Number: GW-1BR
Well Name: _______________
Date: 6/6/2013
Description of Well (condition, etc.):
Well Casing Inner Diameter (di): 0.33 (in feet)
Casing Type: Steel
Screen Type and Length: Steel slotted 10' ISR-GW1BR-130606
Depth to Water (H): 617.25_________________ (in feet)
Total Well Depth (TD): 747___________ (in feet)
Source of Depth Information (records, sounding, etc): Records
Casing Volume [(Vc) = (di/2)2 (TD-H)]: in ft3 11.32 cuft (84.69 gal)
Calculated Purge Volume [(Vc)(7.48)(3)]: in gallons 254.08 gal
Purging Device (type of pump, or other): Electric submersible pump
If Pump, Pumping Rate: 3.4 gpm
Water Quality Measurements
Collected Sample ISR-GW1BR-130606 @ 1348
,__
ANDERSON
l,HGINllRlNG COMPANY INC .
---------------------------------
------------------------------------
Location: Northing____________________ Easting____________________
Horizontal Accuracy (ft): Surface Elevation: Sampler: KC
Sample Designation Number
(Attach Sample Label Here)
Sounding Device: Electronic water level meter
Chain of Custody No:
Meter Type:Horiba U-22 Container Preserv. Analysis
Time Pumping Rate (gpm) Vol Pumped pH Cond. (mS/m) DO (mg/L) Temp (C) TDS (g/L) Turbity ORP (mV) Type
857 3.4 91.8 6.3 0.706 15 6.5 108
900 3.4 102 6.6 0.694 14.8 7 74 1x 500 mL HNO3 dissolved metals
910 3.4 136 7.07 0.702 15 4.9 30 HDPE
920 3.4 170 7.21 0.698 15.5 3.4 27
925 3.4 187 7.26 0.699 15.4 4.2 26 1x 500 mL N/A anions/phys. Prop.
930 3.4 204 7.29 0.699 15.5 4.3 26 HDPE
935 3.4 221 7.31 0.696 15.6 4.2 25
940 3.4 238 7.32 0.698 15.6 5.2 25
943 3.4 248.2 7.33 0.697 15..5 5.5 25
945 3.4 255
950 3.4 272
Groundwater Sampling Log Sheet Well Number: GW-1
Well Name: _______________
Date: 6/7/2013
Description of Well (condition, etc.):
Well Casing Inner Diameter (di): 0.5 (in feet)
Casing Type: Steel
Screen Type and Length: Steel slotted 50' ISR-GW1-130607
Depth to Water (H): __610.0_______________ (in feet)ISR-GW1EB-130607
Collected Sample ISR-GW1EB-130607 @ 0950
Notes: Horiba water quality meter replaced following sampling event at well GW-4 due to a misfunction with pH, DO and TDS sensors. Detected errors in new Horiba water quaility meter; DO sensor was registering 0.0 and TDS sensor was
Total Well Depth (TD): 665.00___________ (in feet)
Source of Depth Information (records, sounding, etc): Records
Casing Volume [(Vc) = (di/2)2 (TD-H)]: in ft3 10.8 cuft (80.78 gal)
Calculated Purge Volume [(Vc)(7.48)(3)]: in gallons 242.33 gal
Purging Device (type of pump, or other): Electric submersible pump
If Pump, Pumping Rate: 3.4 gpm
Water Quality Measurements
Collected Sample ISR-GW1-130607 @ 0945
,,.~
--ANDERSON
(NGIHEIRIHG CO~l'ANY I NC .
---------------------------------
---
-------------------------------------
Location: Northing____________________ Easting____________________
Horizontal Accuracy (ft): Surface Elevation: Sampler: KC
Sample Designation Number
(Attach Sample Label Here)
Sounding Device: Electronic water level meter
Chain of Custody No:
Meter Type:Horiba U-22 Container Preserv. Analysis
Time Pumping Rate (gpm) Vol Pumped pH Cond. (mS/m) DO (mg/L) Temp (C) TDS (g/L) Turbity ORP (mV) Type
1300 3.2 16 7.85 0.557 -14.7 -79.3 -171
1305 3.2 32 7.59 0.624 -14.8 -27.7 -143 1x 500 mL HNO3 dissolved metals
1310 3.2 48 7.51 0.642 - 14.8 - 30.3 -134 HDPE
1315 3.2 64 7.49 0.65 - 14.8 - 26.8 -131
1320 3.2 80 7.48 0.659 - 14.8 - 34.9 -126 1x 500 mL N/A anions/phys. Prop.
1325 3.2 96 7.46 0.665 - 14.8 - 29.8 -120 HDPE
1327 3.2 102.4 7.46 0.666 - 14.8 - 27.3 -118
1329 3.2 108.8 7.46 0.667 - 14.8 - 26 -117
1335 3.2 128
Notes: Horiba water quality meter replaced following sampling event at well GW-4 due to a misfunction with pH, DO and TDS sensors. Detected errors in new Horiba water quaility meter; DO sensor was registering 0.0 and TDS sensor was
Groundwater Sampling Log Sheet Well Number: GW-7
Well Name: _______________
Date: 6/7/2013
Description of Well (condition, etc.):
Well Casing Inner Diameter (di): 0.33 (in feet)
Casing Type: Steel
Screen Type and Length: Steel slotted 50' ISR-GW7-130607
Depth to Water (H): ____592.9_____________ (in feet)
Total Well Depth (TD): 654___________ (in feet)
Source of Depth Information (records, sounding, etc): Records
Casing Volume [(Vc) = (di/2)2 (TD-H)]: in ft3 5.33 cuft (39.88 gal)
Calculated Purge Volume [(Vc)(7.48)(3)]: in gallons 119.65 gal
Purging Device (type of pump, or other): Electric submersible pump
If Pump, Pumping Rate: 3.2 gpm
Water Quality Measurements
Collected Sample ISR-GW7-130607 @ 1335
,__
ANDERSON
l,HGINllRlNG COMPANY INC .
---------------------------------
---
---------------------------------
---
Location: Northing____________________ Easting____________________
Horizontal Accuracy (ft): Surface Elevation: Sampler: KC
Sample Designation Number
(Attach Sample Label Here)
Sounding Device: Electronic water level meter
Chain of Custody No:
Meter Type:Horiba U-22 Container Preserv. Analysis
Time Pumping Rate (gpm) Vol Pumped pH Cond. (mS/m) DO (mg/L) Temp (C) TDS (g/L) Turbity ORP (mV) Type
1620 3.2 48 7.47 0.625 -15.7 -51.9 -77
1623 3.2 57.6 7.52 0.601 -15.2 -45.2 -90 1x 500 mL HNO3 dissolved metals
1626 3.2 67.2 7.5 0.606 - 15.1 - 27.7 -88 HDPE
1629 3.2 76.8 7.48 0.611 - 15 - 27.2 -86
1632 3.2 86.4 7.48 0.612 - 15.1 - 26.5 -85 1x 500 mL N/A anions/phys. Prop.
1635 3.2 96 7.48 0.613 - 15.1 - 25.9 -82 HDPE
1640 3.2 112
Notes: Horiba water quality meter replaced following sampling event at well GW-4 due to a misfunction with pH, DO and TDS sensors. Detected errors in new Horiba water quaility meter; DO sensor was registering 0.0 and TDS sensor was
Groundwater Sampling Log Sheet Well Number: GW-8
Well Name: _______________
Date: 6/7/2013
Description of Well (condition, etc.):
Well Casing Inner Diameter (di): 0.33 (in feet)
Casing Type: Steel
Screen Type and Length: Steel slotted 50' ISR-GW8-130607
Depth to Water (H): ____596.95_____________ (in feet)
Total Well Depth (TD): 654___________ (in feet)
Source of Depth Information (records, sounding, etc): Records
Casing Volume [(Vc) = (di/2)2 (TD-H)]: in ft3 4.98 cuft (37.34 gal)
Calculated Purge Volume [(Vc)(7.48)(3)]: in gallons 111.72 gal
Purging Device (type of pump, or other): Electric submersible pump
If Pump, Pumping Rate: 3.2 gpm
Water Quality Measurements
Collected Sample ISR-GW8-130607 @ 1640
,__
ANDERSON
l,HGINllRlNG COMPANY INC .
---------------------------------
----
---------------------------------
---

IS&R NPL SITE
201 Groundwater Sampling

Appendix &

Standard Operating Procedures

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 1-3
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING PROCEDURES
IS&R SITE

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-3
Anderson Engineering, Inc. Revision Date: 9/2003
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PURPOSE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
2.0 SAMPLE NOMENCLATURE ------------------------------------------------------ Page 2
3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4
4.0 SAMPLE TRACKING ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4
5.0 DAILY CLOSE-OUT ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 5

LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURES 1-5 (Sample Data Sheets) -------------------------------------------- Page 6-10
FIGURE 6 (Sample Flow Chart) ------------------------------------------------------ Page 11
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 1-3
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING PROCEDURES
IS&R SITE

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-3
Anderson Engineering, Inc. Revision Date: 9/2003
2
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING PROCEDURES

1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is to provide a standardized
method for uniquely identifying and tracking samples collected during the Surface Soil
Investigation at the field investigation site. This SOP is to be used by employees of
AECI contractors/subcontractors. This SOP describes both the nomenclature which will
be used to identify samples and outlines the measures by which samples will be tracked
throughout the collection process. Site-specific deviations from the procedures outlined
in this document must be approved by the AECI Project Manager or the Client Project
Manager.

2.0 SAMPLING NOMENCLATURE
Except for the original 8 residences sampled in Lincoln, residential sample labeling
procedures shall conform to SOP 1-12. The original 8 lots, as wells as other samples
will be labeled as follows.
SITE NAME: All labels will begin with “ISR” to indicate that the sample is derived from
the first sampling round of the IS&R/Carr Fork investigation study managed by AECI.

SAMPLE LOCATION NUMBER: Each label will include a unique identification number.
For soil samples, this number will be a 4-digit sequential number starting with “0001” and
progressively increasing until the final sample has been collected or tag number “0999”
has been reached. Surface water, ground water, and pore water samples will have a
number associated with a location or well. The majority of these have already been
established and will continue to have the same number. Field blind duplicate samples
(for QC) will assigned a number within the range of 2000 to 2999. Any judgmental (or
opportunistic) samples will be assigned a number within the range of 3000 to 3999.

Plant tissue samples will be designated by the location number (plant tissue is to be
collected at established soil sample locations) and a designation of whether the tissue
sample represents grass, forbs, or shrubs.

Terrestrial invertebrate samples will be designated by the location number (invertebrate
samples area to be collected at established soil sample locations) and a designation of
“Invertebrate.”

WORK AREA: Each label will include a designation of the Work Area from which the
sample has been collected.

MEDIA: Each label will include a media designation. Media designations include the
following:
GW Ground Water
SW Surface Water
PW Pore Water
SS Surface Soil (0” to 2”)
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 1-3
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING PROCEDURES
IS&R SITE

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-3
Anderson Engineering, Inc. Revision Date: 9/2003
3
SUB Subsurface Soil
SE Sediment
TA Tailings
WIC Waste (Waste Isolation Cell)
EB QC Sample – Equipment Blank

SAMPLE ROUND: The sample round designation applies to both surface and ground
water samples. The sample round is a number (1, 2, 3, or 4) indicating the quarter when
the sample was taken.

SAMPLE DEPTH: Subsurface soil and waste sample labels will indicate the depth (in
feet) at which the sample was taken. A surficial sample will always have the designation
“SS”.

SAMPLE DATE: All samples will contain a sample date consisting of the month and
year the sample was taken. If a sample were taken on March 5, 2001, the sample date
would read 0301.

ALIQUOT REFERENCE DESIGNATION: The aliquot reference designation is a letter
between a and e and represents a portion of a composite sample. When composite
samples are taken the sampler begins with the northeast sample first and then proceeds
counterclockwise until the last sample is taken in the center. The following are the
designations:

(a) – northeast sample
(b) – northwest sample
(c) – southwest sample
(d) – southeast sample
(e) – center sample.

LOT ZONE DESIGNATION: Lots are generally divided into four separate zones, such as
GF (garden/flowerbed), PA (play area), YN, YE, YS, YW (yard sample in cardinal
direction from house). Zones are labeled by using a number such as “Z1” followed by a
the two-letter description.

The following table represents sample designations:

Media Sample Designation
Monitoring Well ISR1-GW12 -R13-03014
Surface Water ISR-SW1-R1-0301
Pore Water ISR-PW1 - WA#6 - 0301
Soil
Surface Soil (0” to 2”) ISR-00015-WA# - SS7-0301-A8
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 1-3
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING PROCEDURES
IS&R SITE

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-3
Anderson Engineering, Inc. Revision Date: 9/2003
4
Subsurface Soil ISR-0002-WA# - SUB-1.59-0301-COMP13
Sediment ISR-0003 - WA# - SED- 000210 - 0301
Tailings ISR-0004 - WA# - TA-1.59 –0301
Waste (Waste Isolation Cell) ISR-0005 - WA# - WIC-1.59 –0301
Pine Canyon (Lincoln) Property
Samples (0riginal 8 lots)
ISR-####PC11 - WA# - Z1YN12 - 0301
Equipment Blank ISR-0007 – WA# - EB – 0301
1 Site Name
2 Sample designation for permanent locations having multiple sampling rounds
(groundwater and surface water) or other permanent locations (such as a piezometer
or lysimeter)
3 Sampling Round
4 Sample Date
5 Sample Location Number
6 Work Area designation (WA-1 through WA-11)
7 Sample Type Designator (surficial, subsurface, sediment, tailing, or waste isolation
cell)
8 Aliquot Reference Designation (use only for composite samples)
9 Sample Depth (in feet below ground surface; for surface sample this designation will
be SS)
10 Sample Depth (in inches below ground surface: 0002 = 0 to 2" sample)
Note: The sample nomenclature may be expanded as needed in the future providing
they are approved by the Project Database Manager or designate.
11 Four digit residential address and street designation (9for example 1234PC would
signify 1234 Pine Canyon)
12 Zone designation
13 Composite sample designation

Duplicate samples for QA/QC will be given a separate sample number so as to be blind
to the analytical laboratory. The duplicate samples will be in the 2000 to 2999 numeric
series (the latter part of the number will be the same as the original sample so as to
identify the duplicate pair).

3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
Field Project Leader (FPL) – May be an AECI employee or contractor who is
responsible for overseeing the sampling activities. The FPL is also responsible for
checking all work performed and verifying that the work satisfies the specific tasks
outlined by this SOP and the Project Plan. Field personnel performing sampling are
responsible for adhering to the guidelines established within this SOP.

4.0 SAMPLE TRACKING
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 1-3
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING PROCEDURES
IS&R SITE

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-3
Anderson Engineering, Inc. Revision Date: 9/2003
5
Prior to sample collection, each team will be given blank copies of media-specific
Sample Data Sheets (see Figures 1 - 5) and a set of pre-printed sample identification
numbers on self-adhesive labels. There will be two labels for each sample number.
When a sample of site medium is collected or field tested, a self-adhesive label will be
transferred from the pre-printed sheet to the sample container. At the same time (before
the collection of any other sample), the second copy of the sample number will be
transferred to the appropriate location on the Sample Data Sheet. The Sample Data
Sheet will be filled out at the time of sample collection by the sample collection team.
This sheet will contain all relevant information necessary to properly identify the sample.
Example Sample Data Sheets are provided in Figures 1 - 5. All Sample Data Sheets will
be maintained in three-ring binder logbooks. Each sampling team will have a separate
logbook. Any errors or mistakes in field recording must be initialed and dated by the
recorder, along with a note explaining the change.
If self-adhesive labels are destroyed and/or voided during sampling activities, this
information should be immediately documented in the general logbook for the field team.

5.0 DAILY CLOSE-OUT
Upon completion of daily sampling activities, the sampling team will return to the office
with samples and corresponding Sample Data Sheets. It is mandatory that each sample
be correlated with its corresponding data sheet. The Field Project Leader or designated
sample custodian will verify that the identification numbers on each sample correspond
to the data sheet, and that each data sheet is legible and filled out in its entirety. A
flowchart that illustrates the general flow of events is presented in Figure 6.
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 1-3
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING PROCEDURES
IS&R SITE

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-3
Anderson Engineering, Inc. Revision Date: 9/2003
6
Figures 1-4
Sampling Data Sheets

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 1-3
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING PROCEDURES
IS&R SITE

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-3
Anderson Engineering, Inc. Revision Date: 9/2003
7
Figure 6: SAMPLE FLOW CHART

REFUSAL AUTHORIZATION

QA Review of
Forms and Samples

LIST OF ALL
PROSPECTIVE PROPERTIES
LIST OF PROPERTIES
ALREADY MEASURED
DATABASE
LIST OF TARGET
PROPERTIES
REQUEST FOR
ACCESS
LIST OF PROPERTIES
APPROVED FOR SAMPLING
UNIQUE SAMPLE ID
FIELD/QC
SAMPLES
FIELD/QC
SAMPLE
DATASHEET
SAMPLE
STORAGE
DATA ENTRY
INTO DATABASE
CHAIN OF CUSTODY LIST
SHIPMENT TO LABORATORY
FIELD/QC SAMPLE PREP
SAMPLE ANALYSIS
I I
+ +
J I~
I I~
+
+
!
~.
I I
I
" ,
+
+
I
+
I
I
+
I
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-4
FIELD QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES

Technical Standard Operating Procedure SOP 1-4
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. 1 Revision Date: 8/2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PURPOSE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
2.0 SCOPE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
3.0 REQUIREMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 2
4.0 REFERENCES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 2
5.0 DEFINITIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 2
6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3
7.0 EQUIPMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 3
8.0 PROCEDURE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 3
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-4
FIELD QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES

Technical Standard Operating Procedure SOP 1-4
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. 2 Revision Date: 8/2003

FIELD QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES

1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this procedure is to define the requirements necessary for Field Quality Control. This
SOP is to be used by employees of AECI and/or contractors/subcontractors. Site-specific deviations
from the procedures outlined in this document must be approved by the AECI Project Manager or the
Client Project Manager prior to initiation of the sampling activity.

2.0 SCOPE
Field Quality Control (QC) is a part of the project Quality Assurance/Quality Control program. This
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) describes the preparation and recommended collection
frequency of various field QC samples for aqueous and soil/sediment media. Table 1 lists the QC
sample types, preparation methods, and recommended frequencies for the field-sampling program.

3.0 REQUIREMENTS
One set of QC samples shall be prepared for each 20 samples collected for soil and sediment samples
tallied on a total number basis. For surface water and groundwater samples, which are defined by a
“sampling event” which takes place quarterly, one set of QC samples shall be prepared for each
sample event.
Field QC samples shall be labeled and shipped with field samples to the laboratory according to SOPs
1-3 and 1-11. Sample custody shall be maintained using the procedures described in SOP 1-6.

4.0 REFERENCES
APHA, AWWA, and WPCF, 1985. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater,
16th Ed. M.H. Franson (ed). American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association,
and Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, D.C.

5.0 DEFINITIONS
Description of Field QC Samples – General descriptions of potentially applicable field QC samples
follow below.
Equipment Blank (EB) - An EB is a sample bottle containing distilled water that is poured over the
decontaminated sampling equipment, such as stainless steel spoon, after decontamination is
complete. The appropriate sample number shall be written on the sample label, and the label shall be
placed on the bottle.
Blind Field Duplicate (BFD) - A BFD consists of split samples taken at the same location and time but
placed in different sample containers and labeled differently for separate analysis. Each duplicate shall
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-4
FIELD QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES

Technical Standard Operating Procedure SOP 1-4
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. 3 Revision Date: 8/2003
be analyzed for identical chemical parameters. A BFD is prepared as follows:
1. Collect an adequate volume of sample to accommodate two sample containers;
2. Process the samples as per appropriate SOP for surface water, groundwater or soil sample
collection for each duplicate;
3. Label the two sample containers with appropriate sample numbers; and
4. Record duplicate number, sample number, and sample location in the field book.
The chain of custody documentation for the BFD should reflect an arbitrary sampling time, which is
consistent with the sample set.
Split - A split sample consists of two samples collected at the same time and place, and of the same
media. The samples are both labeled the same, but are delivered to two separate laboratories for the
same analysis.

6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
Field Project Leader - May be an AECI employee or contractor who is responsible for overseeing the
sampling activities. The FPL is also responsible for checking all work performed and verifying that the
work satisfies the specific tasks outlined by this SOP and the Project Plan.

7.0 EQUIPMENT
none

8.0 PROCEDURE
Field QC measures shall be implemented during sample collection activities to preserve sample
integrity. Sampling equipment shall be decontaminated according to the appropriate SOPs to minimize
potential cross-contamination. In addition, new surgical type gloves shall be worn at each sample
location and, when possible, the sampling program shall proceed from “clean” to “dirty” areas.

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-4
FIELD QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES

Technical Standard Operating Procedure SOP 1-4
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. 4 Revision Date: 8/2003
TABLE 1
RECOMMENDED FIELD QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLING PROGRAM

Quality Control
Sample Name
Abbreviation Applicable
Sample
Media
Preparation
Location
Recommended
Collection
Frequency
Equipment Blank EB Aqueous
Soil/Sediment
Sample Site Once per 20
Blind Field Duplicates BFD Aqueous
Soil/Sediment
Sample Site Once per 20
Split none Aqueous
Soil/Sediment
Sample Site Once per 20 (if
required for project)

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-5
USE OF FIELD LOGBOOKS

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-5
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2001
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PURPOSE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
2.0 SCOPE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 2
3.0 REQUIREMENTS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
4.0 REFERENCES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
5.0 DEFINITIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3
7.0 EQUIPMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3
8.0 PROCEDURE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-5
USE OF FIELD LOGBOOKS

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-5
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2001
2
USE OF FIELD LOGBOOKS

1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this procedure is to detail the minimum requirements for the proper generation and
maintenance of logbooks used during the performance of a field investigation.

2.0 SCOPE
This procedure applies to the following logbooks when required to be maintained during the performance
of a field investigation.
1. Project Logbook.
2. Photographs.

3.0 REQUIREMENTS
Logbooks are initiated at the start of the first on-site activity (e.g., initial reconnaissance survey). Entries
are made each day that on-site activities take place which involve AECI or subcontractor personnel. A
current logbook is maintained throughout the field effort for each activity.
The Site Logbook becomes part of the permanent project file. Because information contained in the Site
Logbook may be admitted as evidence in cost recovery or other litigation, it is critical that this document
be properly maintained.

7.0 REFERENCES
HAZWRAP, July 1990. Quality Control Requirements for Field Methods, DOE/HWP-69/R1.
USAEC, May 1993. U.S. Army Environmental Center Guidelines for Implementation of
ER 1110-1-263 for USAEC Projects.
USATHAMA, January 1990. U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency Quality Assurance
Program, USATHAMA PAM 11-41.

5.0 DEFINITIONS
Logbook - The logbook is a bound notebook with consecutively numbered pages that cannot be
removed. Upon entry of data, the logbook requires the initials of the responsible individual.
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-5
USE OF FIELD LOGBOOKS

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-5
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2001
3
6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
Project Manager
The Site Logbook is issued by the Project Manager to the Field Project Leader or other person
responsible for the direction of on-site activities (e.g., Reconnaissance Survey Team Leader, Sampling
Team Leader). It is the responsibility of this person (or his designee) to keep the Site Logbook current
while in his possession, and return it to the Project Manager or turn it over to another field team. Following
the completion of all fieldwork, the Site Logbook is returned to the Project Manager for inclusion in the
permanent project files.
Field Project Leader
Field Logbooks are issued by the Field Project Leader to the person responsible for on-site activities. It is
the responsibility of this person to keep the logbook current while in his possession and return it to the
Project Manager following completion of all fieldwork or when the logbook is full and a replacement
logbook is needed.

7.0 EQUIPMENT
None specified.

8.0 PROCEDURE
8.1 General
The cover of each logbook shall contain the following information:
Project name
Sequential book number
Start date
End date.
All entries shall be made in black pen. No erasures are permitted. If an incorrect entry is made,
the data shall be crossed out with a single strike mark so as not to be obliterated and initialed and
dated. At the completion of entries by any individual, the logbook must be initialed at the bottom
of every page.
8.2 Site Logbook
The Site Logbook is a controlled document which records all major on-site activities during a field
investigation. At a minimum, the following activities or events shall be recorded in the site
logbook:
Arrival and departure of site visitors
Arrival and departure of equipment
Sample pick-up (e.g., chain-of-custody form numbers, carrier, time)
Sampling activities and sample logsheet numbers
Start or completion of borehole, trench or monitoring well installation or sampling activities
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-5
USE OF FIELD LOGBOOKS

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-5
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2001
4
Health and safety issues
Equipment calibration notes
Equipment operation notes
Daily entries into the logbook may contain a variety of information. At the beginning of each day
the following information must be recorded:
Date
Start time
Weather
All field personnel present
Any visitors present.
During the day, a summary of all site activities and level of personal protection shall be recorded
in the logbook. The information need not duplicate that recorded in other field logbooks (e.g.,
sample data sheets, Field Operations Leader Logbook, Health and Safety Officer's Logbook,
etc.), but shall summarize the contents of these other logbooks.
8.3 Photographs
The record of photographs taken at a site for the purpose of project documentation must be
recorded in the Site Logbook or a field logbook. The date, time, site location, site description, and
weather conditions are entered in the logbook as the photographs are taken.

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-6
SAMPLE CUSTODY AND DOCUMENTATION

Technical Standard Operating Procedure SOP 1-6
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PURPOSE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
2.0 SCOPE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
3.0 REQUIREMENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
4.0 REFERENCES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
5.0 DEFINITIONS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ Page 2
7.0 EQUIPMENT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
8.0 PROCEDURE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-6
SAMPLE CUSTODY AND DOCUMENTATION

Technical Standard Operating Procedure SOP 1-6
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
2
SAMPLE CUSTODY AND DOCUMENTATION

1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this procedure is to define the requirements necessary for Sample Custody and
Documentation.

2.0 SCOPE
A stringent, established program of sample chain-of-custody procedures shall be followed during field
sample collection and handling activities and transfer of the samples to the analytical laboratory.

3.0 REQUIREMENTS
Whenever possible, preprinted labels should be used to ensure that necessary information is retained
with the sample.

4.0 REFERENCES
None

5.0 DEFINITIONS
None

6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
Field Project Leader
The Field Project Leader has overall responsibility for the correct implementation of sampling activities,
including review of the sampling plan and any necessary training of the sampling technician(s). The
actual collection, packaging documentation (sample label and log sheet, chain-of-custody recorded,
Contract Lab reports, etc.) and initial custody of samples will be the responsibility of the sampling
technician(s).

7.0 EQUIPMENT
Sample Label
Field Sample Data Sheet
Chain-of-Custody Record

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-6
SAMPLE CUSTODY AND DOCUMENTATION

Technical Standard Operating Procedure SOP 1-6
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
3
8.0 PROCEDURE
8.1 Sample Label
Each sample shall be labeled, and the following information recorded on the label:
1. Sample identification;
2. Laboratory analyses;
3. Date and time sample was taken;
4. Preservative added; and
5. Remarks, including pertinent field observations.
8.2 Chain-of-Custody Record
Chain-of-custody (COC) records ensure that samples are traceable from the time of collection
until they are received and analyzed by the analytical laboratory. An example COC is attached.
If the samples are shipped via commercial shipper, the COC shall be sealed in the sample-
shipping container, and the shipping agent or courier is not required to sign the COC. Upon
arrival at the lab, the sample custodian checks the custody seals on the sample shipping
container, opens the container and signs as receiving the sample.
A sample is in a person’s custody if one of the following criteria is met:
1. It is in the person’s possession;
2. It is in the person’s view after being in possession;
3. It has been locked up to prevent tampering after it was in the person’s possession; or
4. It was in the person’s possession and was then transferred to a designated secure area.
The COC record is completed and signed by the individual physically in charge of its custody.
The sampler is personally responsible for the care and custody of the sample until it is or
relinquished to a carrier to transport to the laboratory.
When transferring possession of the samples, the individuals relinquishing and receiving the
sample shall sign, date, and write the time of day on the COC record. Samples in separate
coolers shall not be included in the same COC record. The COC record is enclosed with the
samples in each given cooler after it has been signed by the sampler. The COC record also
serves as the laboratory request form.
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-11
PACKAGING AND SHIPMENT OF FIELD SAMPLES

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-11
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PURPOSE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
2.0 SCOPE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
3.0 REQUIREMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 2
4.0 REFERENCES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 2
5.0 DEFINITIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 2
6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3
7.0 EQUIPMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 3
8.0 PROCEDURE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 3
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-11
PACKAGING AND SHIPMENT OF FIELD SAMPLES

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-11
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
2
PACKAGING AND SHIPMENT OF FIELD SAMPLES

1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this procedure is to define the requirements necessary for sample packaging and
information on chain-of-custody records used in sample transfer. Site specific deviations from the
procedures outlined in this document must be approved by the Project Manager or the Client Project
Manager.

2.0 SCOPE
This procedure applies to the packaging, shipping and documentation of samples being transferred from
the field to the laboratory for analysis.

3.0 REQUIREMENTS
Careful packaging, shipping and documentation are necessary to insure that all samples received are
undamaged and authentic.

4.0 REFERENCES
HAZWRAP, July 1990. Quality Control Requirements for Field Methods, DOE/HWP-69/R1.
HAZWRAP, July 1988. Requirements for Quality Assurance of Analytical Data, DOE/HWP-65, Rev. 0,
July 1988.
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1983. Hazardous Materials Regulations, 49 CFR 171-177.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1984. User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Program,
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC.
USAEC, May 1993. U.S. Army Environmental Center Guidelines for Implementation of ER 1110-1-263
for USAEC Projects.
USATHAMA, January 1990. U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency Quality Assurance
Program, USATHAMA PAM 11-41.

5.0 DEFINITIONS
Carrier - A person or firm engaged in the transportation of passengers or property.
Chain-of-Custody Record Form - A Chain-of-Custody Record Form is a printed form that accompanies
a sample or group of samples as custody of the sample(s) is transferred from one custodian to the
subsequent custodian. Chain-of-Custody Record Form is a controlled document. One copy of the form
must be retained in the project file.
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-11
PACKAGING AND SHIPMENT OF FIELD SAMPLES

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-11
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
3
Custodian - The person responsible for the custody of samples at a particular time, until custody is
transferred to another person (and so documented), who then becomes custodian. A sample is under
your custody if:
You possess the sample.
It is in your view, after being in your physical possession.
It was in your physical possession and then you locked it up to prevent tampering.
You have designated and identified a secure area to store the sample.
Environmental Sample - A low concentration sample typically collected offsite and not requiring DOT
hazardous waste labelling as a high hazard sample.
Packaging - The assembly of one or more containers and any other components necessary to insure
that all samples received are undamaged and authentic.
Sample - A sample is physical evidence collected from a facility or the environment, which is
representative of conditions at the point and time that it was collected.

6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
Field Project Leader - Responsible for determining that samples are properly packaged and shipped,
and for determining that the chain-of-custody procedures are implemented from the time the samples are
collected to their release to the shippers.
Field Samplers - Responsible for implementing the packaging and shipping requirements and for
initiating the chain-of-custody records until they are relinquished to another custodian, to the shipper, or to
the carrier.

7.0 EQUIPMENT
1. Bubble Pack
2. Sampling Gloves
3. Reclosable Plastic Bags
4. Permanent Felt Tip Marker
5. Shipping Coolers
6. Ice or Blue Ice.

8.0 PROCEDURE
8.1 Sample Packaging and Shipping
Samples collected for shipment from a site should be classified as environmental samples and in
general, are not expected to be grossly contaminated with high levels of hazardous materials.
•
•
•
•
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 1-11
PACKAGING AND SHIPMENT OF FIELD SAMPLES

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 1-11
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
4

8.2 Environmental Samples
8.2.1 Packaging
Environmental samples may be packaged as follows:
Place each sample within a ziplock back (to prevent sample labels from becoming
saturated due to ice within the sample cooler)
Place samples in a cooler.
Pack with enough cushioning materials to minimize the possibility of container
breakage.
If sample preservation methods call for it, place ice which has been bagged in ziplock
bags (or blue ice) in the cooler to maintain the proper preservative temperature of 4
degrees C
Seal cooler with packing tape or duct tape if cooler is being shipped though
commercial shipper to laboratory.

8.3 Chain-of-Custody
See SOP 1-6 (Sample Custody and Documentation) for Chain of Custody guidelines.
•
•
•
•
•
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 2-8
PRESERVATION AND HANDLING OF AQUEOUS SAMPLES

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 2-8
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PURPOSE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
2.0 REQUIREMENTS ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
3.0 REFERENCES ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
4.0 DEFINITIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
6.0 EQUIPMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
7.0 PROCEDURE S --------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 2-8
PRESERVATION AND HANDLING OF AQUEOUS SAMPLES

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 2-8
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
2
PRESERVATION AND HANDLING OF AQUEOUS SAMPLES

1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this procedure is to describe the techniques and quality control
measures used to collect, preserve and handle water containing the analytes listed
below at the Project Site. Site-specific deviations from the procedures outlined in this
document must be approved by the Project Manager prior to initiation of the sampling
activity.

2.0 REQUIREMENTS
None

3.0 REFERENCES
Technical Additions to Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA-600/4-
82-005
Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater, EPA-
600/4-82-056
Reference Methods were taken from the Clark Fork River Superfund Site Investigations,
Quality Assurance Project Plan, February 1992

4.0 DEFINITIONS
None

5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
Project Manager
The Project Manager (PM) is responsible for the selection of the appropriate
methodology, technique and field procedure for conducting the handling and
preservation of aqueous samples. The
Field Project Leader (FPL)
The FPL is responsible for overseeing the sampling activities. The FPL is also
responsible for checking all work performed and verifying that the work satisfies the
specific tasks outlined by this SOP and the Project Plan.

6.0 EQUIPMENT
See specific test

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 2-8
PRESERVATION AND HANDLING OF AQUEOUS SAMPLES

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 2-8
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
3
7.0 PROCEDURE
This SOP describes the techniques and quality control measures used to collect,
preserve and handle water containing the analytes listed below.
1. Metals – Total and Dissolved (Al, Sb, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Ca, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb,
Mg, Mn, Hg, Ni, K, Se, Ag, Na, Tl, V, Zn)
2. Chloride
3. Nitrate
4. Nitrite
5. Sulfate
6. Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
7. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
8. Alkalinity
9. Acidity

7.1 Metals – Total and Dissolved
7.1.1. Containers
Polyethylene bottles preserved with nitric acid (HNO3) to pH 2
7.1.2 Preservation and Handling
Fill the sample bottle to within 1 inch of the cap, and secure cap
tightly.
All samples should be analyzed for metals within 6 months of
collection, with the exception of mercury, which must be analyzed
within 28 days.
7.2 Chloride
7.2.1 Container
Polyethylene bottle
7.2.2 Preservation and Handling
All samples should be analyzed within 28 days of collection.
7.3 Nitrate
7.3.1 Container
Polyethylene bottle
7.3.2 Preservation and Handling
Store sample at 4ºC until analyzed.
All samples should be analyzed within 48 hours of collection.
7.4 Nitrite
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 2-8
PRESERVATION AND HANDLING OF AQUEOUS SAMPLES

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 2-8
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
4
7.4.1 Container
Polyethylene bottle
7.4.2 Preservation and Handling
Store sample at 4ºC until analyzed.
All samples should be analyzed within 48 hours of collection.
7.5 Sulfate
7.5.1 Container
Polyethylene bottle
7.5.2 Preservation and Handling
Store sample at 4ºC until analyzed.
All samples should be analyzed within 28 days of collection
7.6 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
7.6.1 Container
Polyethylene bottle
7.6.2 Preservation and Handling
Store sample at 4ºC until analyzed.
All samples should be analyzed within 7 days of collection.
7.7 Alkalinity and Acidity
7.7.1 Container
Polyethylene bottle
7.7.2 Preservation and Handling
Store sample at 4ºC until analyzed.
All samples should be analyzed within 14 days of collection.

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES No. 2-9
FIELD WATER QUALITY MEASUREMENTS

Technical Standard Operating Procedure SOP 2-9
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 2/2008
1
1.0 PURPOSE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
2.0 SCOPE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
3.0 REQUIREMENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
4.0 REFERENCES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
5.0 DEFINITIONS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
7.0 EQUIPMENT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
8.0 PROCEDURES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES No. 2-9
FIELD WATER QUALITY MEASUREMENTS

Technical Standard Operating Procedure SOP 2-9
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 2/2008
2
FIELD WATER QUALITY MEASUREMENTS

1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this procedure is to define the requirements for the standard operating procedure of
taking field water quality measurements, including pH, temperature, oxidation-reduction potential,
turbidity, dissolved oxygen, and conductivity.

2.0 SCOPE
This procedure applies to the calibration, operation, and maintenance of a Horiba U-10 or U-22 water
quality meter, which measures pH, temperature, turbidity, and conductivity. Additionally, dissolved
oxygen (DO) and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) should be recorded, but are for information
purposes only, and not used to determine purge efficiency.

3.0 REQUIREMENTS
Electrical conductance of a substance is its ability to conduct an electrical current. Chemically pure water
has a low electrical conductance; while water that contains dissolved inorganic solids (chloride,
phosphate, etc.) has a higher electrical conductance. Consequently, the greater the amount of dissolved
solids in groundwater or surface water the greater the water's electrical conductivity.

4.0 REFERENCES
Horiba U-10 Water Quality Checker Instruction Manual
Horiba U-22 Water Quality Checker Instruction Manual

5.0 DEFINITIONS
None.

6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
Field Project Leader (FPL)
The FPL is responsible for overseeing the sampling activities and ensuring the proper calibration and
maintenance of field water quality instruments.

7.0 EQUIPMENT
The instruments to be used for testing water quality in the field include the following:

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES No. 2-9
FIELD WATER QUALITY MEASUREMENTS

Technical Standard Operating Procedure SOP 2-9
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 2/2008
3
Horiba U-10 Water Quality Checker
Horiba U-22 Water Quality Checker

8.0 PROCEDURE
The manufacturers instructions included with the units are to be followed for initial and continuing
calibration, and maintenance of the instruments. Instruction manuals are to be on-site with the
instruments and are to be reviewed by the field personnel at the beginning of the sampling event.
Instrument calibration of pH and conductivity should be done with standards that bracket the expected
range of measured values.
Instruments are to be calibrated daily at or before the first sampling location of the day. Calibration
information is to be recorded in the field log book.

•
•
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-1
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-1
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PURPOSE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
2.0 SCOPE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
3.0 REQUIREMENTS ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
4.0 REFERENCES ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
5.0 DEFINITIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3
6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3
7.0 EQUIPMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3
8.0 PROCEDURE --------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-1
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-1
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
2
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this procedure is to obtain groundwater samples that are representative of
the source from which they are taken and minimize sampler exposure to groundwater
contaminants. The methods and equipment described are for the collection of water
samples from the saturated zone of the substrata. Site-specific deviations from the
procedures outlined in this document must be approved by the Project Manager prior to
initiation of the sampling activity.

2.0 SCOPE
This procedure provides information on proper equipment and techniques for groundwater
sampling. Review of the information contained herein will facilitate planning of the field
sampling effort by describing standard sampling techniques. The techniques described
should be followed whenever applicable, noting the site-specific conditions adjustments in
methodology.

3.0 REQUIREMENTS
Generally, wells should be sampled within three hours of purging. However, wells with
poor recharge should be sampled within 24 hours of purging. Poor recharge wells are
defined as those that cannot recharge 80 percent of the original volume within 24 hours. All
sampling equipment must be decontaminated before commencement of sampling.

4.0 REFERENCES
ASTM, 1986. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 11. Volume 11.04, D4448-85A.
Barcelona, M.J., J.P. Gibb and R.A. Miller, 1983. A Guide to the Selection of Materials for
Monitoring Well Construction and Groundwater Sampling, ISWS Contract Report 327,
Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
Johnson Division, UOP, Inc., 1975. Ground Water and Wells, A Reference Book for the
Water Well Industry, Johnson Division, UOP, Inc., Saint Paul, Minnesota.
Nielson, D.M. and G.L. Yeates, 1985. A Comparison of Sampling Mechanisms Available
for Small-Diameter Ground Water Monitoring Wells, Ground Water Monitoring Review
5:38-98.
Scalf, M.R., J.F. McNabb, W.J. Dunlapp, R.L. Crosby and J. Fryberger, 1981. Manual of
Ground Water Sampling Procedures, R.S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Office
of Research and Development, USEPA, Ada, Oklahoma.
HAZWRAP, July 1990. Quality Control Requirements for Field Methods, DOE/HWP-69/R1.
USAEC, May 1993. U.S. Army Environmental Center Guidelines for Implementation of ER
1110-1-263 for USAEC Projects.
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-1
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-1
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
3
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1980. Procedures Manual for
Ground Water Monitoring at Solid Waste Disposal Facilities, Office of Solid Waste, USEPA,
Washington, DC.
USEPA, 1987. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
EPA SW-846.
USEPA, 1987. Ground Water Handbook, EPA/625/6-87/016.
USEPA, 1987. A Compendium of Superfund Field Operations Methods,
EPA/540/P-87/001.
USEPA, September 1986. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Ground
Monitoring Technical Enforcement Guidance Document, OSWER-9950.1.
USATHAMA, January 1990. U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency Quality
Assurance Program, USATHAMA PAM 11-41.

5.0 DEFINITIONS
None

6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
Field Project Leader (FPL) – The FPL is responsible for overseeing the sampling
activities. The FPL is also responsible for checking all work performed and verifying that
the work satisfies the specific tasks outlined by this SOP and the Project Plan.

7.0 EQUIPMENT
Sample containers shall conform with EPA regulations for preservation of appropriate
contaminants (see SOP 2-8 “Preservation and Handling of Aqueous Samples”). The
sample withdrawal equipment most commonly used are discussed in SOP 4-9 “Well
Purging-Pumping Methods”. The following items may be needed to collect groundwater
samples:
1. Sample Containers
2. Coolers for Sample Shipping and Cooling
3. Appropriate Packing Cartons and Filler
4. Labels
5. Chain-of-Custody Documents
6. Temperature Meter
7. pH Meter
8. Dissolved Oxygen Meter
9. Specific Conductivity Meter
10. Turbidity Meter
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-1
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-1
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
4
11. Oxygen/Reduction Potential (ORP) Meter
12. Water-Level Indicator
13. Appropriate Sampling Gloves
14. Field Sampling Logbook
15. Plastic Trash Bags
16. Indelible Marking Pens
17. Shallow-Well Pumps (centrifugal, positive displacement or peristaltic pumps
where applicable)
18. Deep-Well Pumps (submersible pump and electrical power generating unit
or bladder pump with compressed air source, where applicable)
19. Sample Tubing Such as Teflon®, Polyethylene and Polypropylene (tubing
type shall be selected based on specific site requirements and must be
chemically inert to groundwater being sampled)
20. Teflon® or Polyethylene Bailers
21. Teflon®-Coated Wire, Stainless Steel Single Strand Wire, Polypropylene
Monofilament Line, or One-Quarter Inch Nylon Rope and Tripod-Pulley
Assemble (if necessary)
22. Pails (plastic, graduated)
23. Decontamination Solutions (distilled water, Alconox or Liquinox, where
applicable)
24. Volatile organic vapor detection equipment (such as PID, OVM, or HnU)
8.0 PROCEDURE
8.1 General
To be useful and accurate, a groundwater sample must be representative of the
particular saturated zone of the substrata being sampled. The method described in
SOP 4-9 for purging wells prior to sampling consists of the use of pumps. The
procedures described in SOP 4-9 will be used for purging wells prior to sampling.

8.1.1 Sampling Methods
The collection of a groundwater sample is made up of the following steps.
1. Fill out sample labels for each of the required sample containers. The
following information must be included on the sample label:
site name
field identification or sample station number
date and time of sample collection
designation of the sample as grab or composite
sample preservative used
•
•
•
•
•
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-1
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-1
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
5
types of analyses to be performed.
If a sample is split with another party, sample labels with identical
information should be attached to each of the sample containers.
2. If organic vapors are suspected in the well, based on known site
contaminants, then the well casing shall be checked for organic vapors after
removing the well cap using an organic vapor monitor.
3. Sound the well for total depth and water level (using decontaminated
equipment) and record these data in the field notebook.
4. Calculate depth from the casing top to the groundwater surface.
5. An initial measurement of purge water for physical parameters including pH,
conductivity, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation-reduction potential
shall be recorded on the Groundwater Sampling Form and in the Field
Logbook.
6. Lower purging equipment into the well to a short distance below the water
level and begin water removal. If resistance is encountered when lowering
the device into the well, withdraw the device from the well and inform the
Field Operations Leader. Purge the well in accordance with SOP 4-9.
7. To ensure that groundwater samples are representative of actual conditions,
samplers must work efficiently to minimize the loss of groundwater
contaminants and the introduction of foreign contaminants. To prevent
contamination of samples, the sample bottles should be opened only when
receiving groundwater samples and closed immediately afterwards. To
prevent introduction of foreign contaminants into the well, sample bottles
should be held away from the well opening and discharge pipe when
receiving samples and the bailing rope (if used) should not be allowed to
touch the ground, or other potentially contaminating objects.
8. When a sample bottle is filled, the bottle must be tightly capped as soon as
possible. (If sampling for volatile organic compounds, it must be endured
that the sample does not contain any air bubbles before securing the cap.)
SOP 2-8 details the sample containers to be used for specific analysis.
9. As soon as all samples are collected, prepare the samples for shipment in
accordance with SOP 1-11 “Packaging and Shipment of Field Samples.”
10. Record all sampling information in the Field Logbook.
11. Decontaminate equipment in accordance with SOPs 1-8.

8.1.2 Collection of Split Sample or Field Duplicates
Whenever field duplicates are collected or samples are split with another
organization the additional samples for identical analyses will be collected along
with the original sample.
8.1.3 Sample Containers
•
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-1
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-1
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
6
For most samples and analytical parameters, either glass or plastic containers are
satisfactory. SOP 2-8 describes the required sampling containers for various
analytes at various concentrations.
8.1.4 Preservation of Samples and Sample Volume Requirements
Sample preservation techniques and volume requirements depend on the type and
concentration of the contaminant and on the type of analysis to be performed. SOP
2-8 describes the sample preservation and volume requirements for most of the
chemicals that will be encountered during site investigations.
8.1.5 Field Filtration
For sites at which metals are the primary constituent of concern, the collected
water should be carefully poured into the acidified bottle (nitric acid to pH of 2)
designated for total metals without overflowing.
Another batch of water should be similarly collected in the raw water bottle or in
an empty (clean) distilled water jug, from which a filtered sample for dissolved
metals can be obtained. The peristaltic pump equipped with new, disposable
tubing is used to pump water from the raw water bottle through the new,
disposable 0.45 micron filter, and into a second acidified bottle for dissolved
metals analysis. Alternately, the disposable filter may be attached directly to a
submersible pump discharge port and the water pumped directly through the filter
and into the acidified bottle for dissolved metals analysis. Another option is to
attach the filter and tubing to a disposable pressurized bailer.
After collection at each sample site, the tubing and filter should be discarded.
The raw water bottle used for collection purposes is then refilled and sealed for
the remaining analytical sample, such as for anions and physical parameters.
Refer to SOP 2-8: Preservation and Handling of Aqueous Samples for specific
information regarding sample preservation and handling.
8.1.6 Handling and Transporting Samples
After collection, samples should be handled as little as possible. Ice should be
bagged and steps taken to ensure that the melted ice does not cause sample
containers to be submerged and thus the possibility of cross-contaminated. All
sample containers should be enclosed in plastic bags to prevent
cross-contamination.
Samples should be secured in the ice chest to prevent movement of sample
containers and possible breakage (especially if glass containers are used). Sample
packing and transportation requirements are described in SOP 1-11.
8.1.7 Sample Holding Times
Holding times, allowed time between sample collection and analysis for routine
samples, are discussed in SOP 2-8.
8.2 Records
Records will be maintained for each sample that is taken, including the following
information:
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-1
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-1
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
7
Sample identification (site name, location, project number; sample name/number
and location; time and date; sampler's identity).
Sample source and source description.
Field observations and measurements (appearance; field chemistry; sampling
method).
Sample disposition (analyses to be run; number and size of bottle; preservatives
added).
Additional remarks (e.g., sampled in conjunction with state, county, local regulatory
authorities; etc.).
8.3 Chain of Custody
Proper chain-of-custody procedures play a crucial role in data gathering. SOP 1-6
“Sample Custody and Documentation” describes the requirements for a correct
chain-of-custody.
•
•
•
•
•
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-1
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-1
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 11/2007
8

APPENDIX 4-1

Groundwater Sampling Form

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-9
WELL PURGING—PUMPING METHOD

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-9
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 2/2008
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PURPOSE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
2.0 SCOPE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
3.0 REQUIREMENTS ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
4.0 REFERENCES ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
5.0 DEFINITIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3
6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ---------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3
7.0 EQUIPMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3
8.0 PROCEDURE --------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-9
WELL PURGING—PUMPING METHOD

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-9
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 2/2008
2
WELL PURGING—PUMPING METHOD

1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this procedure is to provide general reference information on well purging
by the pumping method prior to the sampling of groundwater wells. The methods and
equipment described are for the purging of water samples from the saturated zone of the
substrata. Site-specific deviations from the procedures outlined in this document must
be approved by the Project Manager prior to initiation of the sampling activity.

2.0 SCOPE
This procedure applies to purging relatively large volumes of water prior to sampling.

3.0 REQUIREMENTS
Methods for purging from completed wells include the use of pumps, bailers, and various
types of samplers. The primary considerations in obtaining a representative sample of the
groundwater are to avoid collection of stagnant (standing) water in the well and to avoid
physical or chemical alteration of the water due to purging and sampling techniques. In a
non-pumping well, there will be little or no vertical mixing of water in the well pipe or casing,
and stratification will occur. The well water in the screened section will mix with the
groundwater due to normal flow patterns, but the well water above the screened section will
remain isolated and become stagnant.

4.0 REFERENCES
HAZWRAP, July 1990. Quality Control Requirements for Field Methods, DOE/HWP-69/R1.
USAEC, May 1993. U.S. Army Environmental Center Guidelines for Implementation of ER
1110-1-263 for USAEC Projects.
USATHAMA, January 1990. U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency Quality
Assurance Program, USATHAMA PAM 11-41.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1987. Ground Water Handbook,
EPA/625/6-87/016.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, September 1986. Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) Ground Monitoring Technical Enforcement Guidance
Document, OSWER-9950.1.

TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-9
WELL PURGING—PUMPING METHOD

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-9
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 2/2008
3
5.0 DEFINITIONS
None

6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
Project Manager - The Project Manager is responsible for reviewing the purging
procedures used by the field crew and for performing in-field spot checks for proper purging
procedures.
Field Project Leader (FPL) - The Field Project Leader is responsible for selecting and
detailing the specific well purging techniques and equipment to be used, documenting
these in the Field Logbook, and properly briefing the site sampling personnel. The FPL will
be responsible for purging of wells, performing necessary physical measurements and
observations, and containment of purged water. The FPL must record pertinent
information including amount of water purged, pH, specific conductivity, temperature,
and turbidity in the Field Logbook.

7.0 EQUIPMENT
The following equipment may be needed for the completion of this work.
1. Purge Pump
a. A Peristaltic pump creates a vacuum in a flexible polymer tube that is
capable of drawing water out of a well from approximately 30 feet deep.
The tubing runs through the pump's roller-bearing housing, which cyclically
squeezes it, forcing water out the top and drawing water in the bottom. The
pump sits at the surface, only the tubing is lowered into the well. The pump
can draw water very slowly and steadily with a minimum of agitation, making
it ideal for the development, purging and sampling of slow recharge wells
less than 30 feet deep.
b. Submersible pumps take in water and push the sample up a sample tube to
the surface. The power sources of these samplers may be compressed gas
or electricity. The operation principles vary and the displacement of the
sample can be by an inflatable bladder, sliding piston, or impeller. Pumps
are available for 2-inch diameter wells and larger. These pumps can lift
water from considerable depths (several hundred feet).
2. Power Source
3. Water Level Indicator
4. pH Meter
5. Specific Conductance Meter
6. Temperature Meter
7. Turbidity Meter
10. Tank(s) or Container(s) to Contain the Purge Water (if required)
11. Field Logbook
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-9
WELL PURGING—PUMPING METHOD

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-9
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 2/2008
4
10. Calculator

8.0 PROCEDURE
8.1 General
The amount of water to be purged from a well is generally considered to be three
casing volumes. A well will not be sampled until a minimum three casing volumes of
water are removed.
Water quality parameters of the purge water, which include temperature, pH,
conductivity, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation-reduction potential, will be
monitored during the purging operation in order to gauge when the parameters
have stabilized.
When feasible, and especially on sites where wells have known high contaminant
levels, upgradient and background wells should be sampled first in order to prevent
cross-contamination.
8.2 Calculations of Well Volume
To ensure that the proper volume of water has been removed from the well prior to
sampling, it is first necessary to determine the volume of standing water in the well
casing. The volume can be easily calculated by the following method. Calculations
shall be entered in the Field Logbook:
1. Obtain all available information on well construction (location, casing, screens,
etc.).
2. Determine well casing diameter.
3. Measure and record static water level (depth below ground level or top of
casing reference point).
4. Determine depth of well (if not known from past records) by sounding, using a
clean, decontaminated, weighted tape measure or water level indicator.
5. Calculate number of linear feet of static water (total depth or length of well pipe
minus the depth to static water level).
6. Calculate the volume of water in the casing:
Vc = π (di/2)2(TD-H)
Vt = (Vc ) (7.48)
where:
Vc = volume of water in casing, ft3
Vt = total volume, gal
di = inside diameter of casing, ft
TD = total depth of well, ft
H = depth to water, ft, from ground surface
7. Multiply the calculated casing volume by three.
•
•
•
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-9
WELL PURGING—PUMPING METHOD

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-9
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 2/2008
5
8.3 Specific Procedure
Open the well casing cover, remove the well cap (if present).
Measure the "depth to water" in the well.
Calculate the volume of water in the well. Record this information in the Field
Logbook and calculate the volume of water required to be purged. Normally, the
well will be purged of three volumes of water and until the field parameters have
stabilized (see discussion on requirements for stabilization below).
Water quality parameter measurements shall be recorded in the Field Logbook.
Lower the purge pump into the well until it is submerged.
*NOTE: If resistance is encountered when lowering the pump into the well,
WITHDRAW THE PUMP FROM THE WELL and inform the Field Project
Leader.
Direct the pump discharge hose into the receptor vessel and start the pump in
accordance with the pump's operation manual. Purging will continue until a
minimum of three well volumes are removed and water quality parameters have
stabilized. During well purging, monitor indicator field parameters (turbidity,
temperature, specific conductance, pH) every three to five minutes (or less
frequently, if appropriate). Purging is considered complete and sampling may
begin when all the above indicator field parameters have stabilized. Stabilization
is considered to be achieved when three consecutive readings, taken at three (3)
to five (5) minute intervals, are within the following limits:
o turbidity (10% for values greater than 1 NTU)
o specific conductance (3%)
o temperature (3%)
o pH (± 0.1 unit)
In addition, dissolved oxygen (DO) and oxygen-reduction potential (ORP) should
be recorded on the groundwater sampling log sheet, but these are to be
considered for informational purposes only.
If the well pumps dry and will not yield 3 purge volumes, wait 24 hours to sample.
Samples may be collected if the well recovers 80%. If the well does not recover
80%, then that well should be declared dry for this particular sample round.
Water samples shall be obtained immediately after purging is complete. A new pair
of disposable sampling gloves (latex) shall be worn for the collection of each
sample.
Record in the Field Log Book the total volume of purge water pumped from the well.
Volume determination may be made using either an in-line flow meter with totalizer;
or by measuring the height of the collected purge water in the collection tank,
measuring the diameter of the tank, and calculating the volume.
Carefully withdraw the purge pump from the well and decontaminate the pump and
hose after purging is complete.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
TECHNICAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 4-9
WELL PURGING—PUMPING METHOD

Technical Standard Operating Procedures SOP 4-9
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. Revision Date: 2/2008
6
Dispose of all waste items in accordance with SOP 1-10: Site Clean-Up Activities.
8.4 Sampling Handling and Preservation
Refer to SOP 2-8: Preservation and Handling of Aqueous Samples for specific
information regarding sample preservation and handling.
•

IS&R NPL SITE
201 Groundwater Sampling

Appendix '

Groundwater Sampling Analytical Reports
-XQH 201

#=CL#
August 05, 2013
LIMS USE: FR - RYAN ANDERSON
LIMS OBJECT ID: 60146628
60146628 Re­analyzed TDS on 60146628001
Project:
Pace Project No.:
RE:
Ryan Anderson
BP Anderson Engineering Compan
977 West 2100 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84119
IS&R Revised Report 8/5/13_rev.1
Dear Ryan Anderson:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on June 11, 2013. The
results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless
otherwise noted in the body of the report.
Sample 60146628001 was re­analyzed per the client's request as the result appeared to be higher than
it has been in historicals. The re­analysis result was lower than to original result and matched the original and
re­analysis of the conductivity as well. Therefore, the re­analyzed result has been posted. If you have any
questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.Sincerely,
Heather Wilson
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 1 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=CP#
CERTIFICATIONS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Kansas Certification IDs
9608 Loiret Boulevard, Lenexa, KS 66219
WY STR Certification #: 2456.01
Arkansas Certification #: 13-012-0
Illinois Certification #: 003097
Iowa Certification #: 118
Kansas/NELAP Certification #: E-10116
Louisiana Certification #: 03055
Nevada Certification #: KS000212008A
Oklahoma Certification #: 9205/9935
Texas Certification #: T104704407-13-4
Utah Certification #: KS000212013-3
Illinois Certification #: 003097
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 2 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=SS#
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Lab ID Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received
60146628001 ISR-GW4-130604 Water 06/04/13 13:50 06/11/13 08:20
60146628002 ISR-GW11-130605 Water 06/05/13 11:34 06/11/13 08:20
60146628003 ISR-GW3A-130605 Water 06/05/13 16:03 06/11/13 08:20
60146628004 ISR-GW32A-130605 Water 06/05/13 16:06 06/11/13 08:20
60146628005 ISR-GW1BR-130606 Water 06/06/13 13:48 06/11/13 08:20
60146628006 ISR-GW1-130607 Water 06/07/13 09:45 06/11/13 08:20
60146628007 ISR-GW1EB-130607 Water 06/07/13 11:50 06/11/13 08:20
60146628008 ISR-GW7-130607 Water 06/07/13 13:35 06/11/13 08:20
60146628009 ISR-GW8-130607 Water 06/07/13 16:40 06/11/13 08:20
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 3 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=SA#
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Lab ID Sample ID Method
Analytes
ReportedAnalysts
60146628001 ISR-GW4-130604 EPA 6010 3SMW
EPA 6020 2JGP
SM 2320B 1JMC
SM 2540C 1LEM
SM 2540D 1JML
EPA 300.0 2OL
60146628002 ISR-GW11-130605 EPA 6010 3SMW
EPA 6020 2JGP
SM 2320B 1JMC
SM 2540C 1JML
SM 2540D 1JML
EPA 300.0 2OL
60146628003 ISR-GW3A-130605 EPA 6010 3SMW
EPA 6020 2JGP
SM 2320B 1JMC
SM 2540C 1JML
SM 2540D 1JML
EPA 300.0 2OL
60146628004 ISR-GW32A-130605 EPA 6010 3SMW
EPA 6020 2JGP
SM 2320B 1JMC
SM 2540C 1JML
SM 2540D 1JML
EPA 300.0 2OL
60146628005 ISR-GW1BR-130606 EPA 6010 3SMW
EPA 6020 2JGP
SM 2320B 1JMC
SM 2540C 1JML
SM 2540D 1JML
EPA 300.0 2OL
60146628006 ISR-GW1-130607 EPA 6010 3SMW
EPA 6020 2JGP
SM 2320B 1JMC
SM 2540C 1JML
SM 2540D 1JML
EPA 300.0 2OL
60146628007 ISR-GW1EB-130607 EPA 6010 3SMW
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 4 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=SA#
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Lab ID Sample ID Method
Analytes
ReportedAnalysts
EPA 6020 2JGP
SM 2320B 1JMC
SM 2540C 1JML
SM 2540D 1JML
EPA 300.0 2OL
60146628008 ISR-GW7-130607 EPA 6010 3SMW
EPA 6020 2JGP
SM 2320B 1JMC
SM 2540C 1JML
SM 2540D 1JML
EPA 300.0 2OL
60146628009 ISR-GW8-130607 EPA 6010 3SMW
EPA 6020 2JGP
SM 2320B 1JMC
SM 2540C 1JML
SM 2540D 1JML
EPA 300.0 2OL
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 5 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Sample: ISR-GW4-130604 Lab ID: 60146628001 Collected: 06/04/13 13:50 Received: 06/11/13 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. QualReport Limit
6010 MET ICP, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Calcium, Dissolved 72500 ug/L 06/17/13 10:56 7440-70-206/14/13 09:30100 1
Iron, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 10:56 7439-89-606/14/13 09:3050.0 1
Magnesium, Dissolved 29400 ug/L 06/17/13 10:56 7439-95-406/14/13 09:3050.0 1
6020 MET ICPMS, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6020 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Arsenic, Dissolved 1.7 ug/L 06/17/13 11:37 7440-38-206/14/13 13:301.0 1
Lead, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 11:37 7439-92-106/14/13 13:301.0 1
2320B Alkalinity Analytical Method: SM 2320B
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 193 mg/L 06/13/13 09:3920.0 1
2540C Total Dissolved Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 447 mg/L 08/05/12 10:00 1e,H15.0 1
2540D Total Suspended Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids 7.0 mg/L 06/12/13 13:14 H15.0 1
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days Analytical Method: EPA 300.0
Chloride 36.8 mg/L 06/19/13 13:08 16887-00-610.0 10
Sulfate 124 mg/L 06/19/13 13:08 14808-79-810.0 10
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 6 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Sample: ISR-GW11-130605 Lab ID: 60146628002 Collected: 06/05/13 11:34 Received: 06/11/13 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. QualReport Limit
6010 MET ICP, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Calcium, Dissolved 75400 ug/L 06/17/13 11:05 7440-70-206/14/13 09:30100 1
Iron, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 11:05 7439-89-606/14/13 09:3050.0 1
Magnesium, Dissolved 36800 ug/L 06/17/13 11:05 7439-95-406/14/13 09:3050.0 1
6020 MET ICPMS, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6020 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Arsenic, Dissolved 2.8 ug/L 06/17/13 11:54 7440-38-206/14/13 13:301.0 1
Lead, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 11:54 7439-92-106/14/13 13:301.0 1
2320B Alkalinity Analytical Method: SM 2320B
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 220 mg/L 06/14/13 10:4220.0 1
2540C Total Dissolved Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 544 mg/L 06/12/13 15:545.0 1
2540D Total Suspended Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids ND mg/L 06/12/13 13:165.0 1
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days Analytical Method: EPA 300.0
Chloride 28.9 mg/L 06/20/13 11:39 16887-00-62.0 2
Sulfate 152 mg/L 06/19/13 14:25 14808-79-810.0 10
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 7 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Sample: ISR-GW3A-130605 Lab ID: 60146628003 Collected: 06/05/13 16:03 Received: 06/11/13 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. QualReport Limit
6010 MET ICP, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Calcium, Dissolved 70400 ug/L 06/17/13 11:08 7440-70-206/14/13 09:30100 1
Iron, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 11:08 7439-89-606/14/13 09:3050.0 1
Magnesium, Dissolved 28200 ug/L 06/17/13 11:08 7439-95-406/14/13 09:3050.0 1
6020 MET ICPMS, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6020 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Arsenic, Dissolved 1.1 ug/L 06/17/13 11:58 7440-38-206/14/13 13:301.0 1
Lead, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 11:58 7439-92-106/14/13 13:301.0 1
2320B Alkalinity Analytical Method: SM 2320B
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 262 mg/L 06/14/13 10:5520.0 1
2540C Total Dissolved Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 444 mg/L 06/12/13 15:545.0 1
2540D Total Suspended Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids ND mg/L 06/12/13 13:185.0 1
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days Analytical Method: EPA 300.0
Chloride 45.5 mg/L 06/19/13 14:40 16887-00-610.0 10
Sulfate 65.0 mg/L 06/19/13 14:40 14808-79-810.0 10
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 8 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Sample: ISR-GW32A-130605 Lab ID: 60146628004 Collected: 06/05/13 16:06 Received: 06/11/13 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. QualReport Limit
6010 MET ICP, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Calcium, Dissolved 79200 ug/L 06/17/13 12:00 7440-70-206/14/13 09:30100 1
Iron, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 12:00 7439-89-606/14/13 09:3050.0 1
Magnesium, Dissolved 31100 ug/L 06/17/13 11:11 7439-95-406/14/13 09:3050.0 1
6020 MET ICPMS, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6020 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Arsenic, Dissolved 1.2 ug/L 06/17/13 12:02 7440-38-206/14/13 13:301.0 1
Lead, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 12:02 7439-92-106/14/13 13:301.0 1
2320B Alkalinity Analytical Method: SM 2320B
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 265 mg/L 06/14/13 11:0020.0 1
2540C Total Dissolved Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 421 mg/L 06/12/13 15:545.0 1
2540D Total Suspended Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids ND mg/L 06/12/13 13:185.0 1
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days Analytical Method: EPA 300.0
Chloride 44.9 mg/L 06/19/13 14:56 16887-00-610.0 10
Sulfate 64.7 mg/L 06/19/13 14:56 14808-79-810.0 10
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 9 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Sample: ISR-GW1BR-130606 Lab ID: 60146628005 Collected: 06/06/13 13:48 Received: 06/11/13 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. QualReport Limit
6010 MET ICP, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Calcium, Dissolved 71100 ug/L 06/17/13 11:15 7440-70-206/14/13 09:30100 1
Iron, Dissolved 72.0 ug/L 06/17/13 11:15 7439-89-606/14/13 09:3050.0 1
Magnesium, Dissolved 31500 ug/L 06/17/13 11:15 7439-95-406/14/13 09:3050.0 1
6020 MET ICPMS, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6020 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Arsenic, Dissolved 1.5 ug/L 06/17/13 12:06 7440-38-206/14/13 13:301.0 1
Lead, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 12:06 7439-92-106/14/13 13:301.0 1
2320B Alkalinity Analytical Method: SM 2320B
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 206 mg/L 06/14/13 11:0820.0 1
2540C Total Dissolved Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 541 mg/L 06/13/13 15:115.0 1
2540D Total Suspended Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids ND mg/L 06/13/13 13:185.0 1
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days Analytical Method: EPA 300.0
Chloride 24.6 mg/L 06/20/13 11:56 16887-00-62.0 2
Sulfate 112 mg/L 06/19/13 15:11 14808-79-810.0 10
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 10 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Sample: ISR-GW1-130607 Lab ID: 60146628006 Collected: 06/07/13 09:45 Received: 06/11/13 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. QualReport Limit
6010 MET ICP, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Calcium, Dissolved 69600 ug/L 06/17/13 11:18 7440-70-206/14/13 09:30100 1
Iron, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 11:18 7439-89-606/14/13 09:3050.0 1
Magnesium, Dissolved 31700 ug/L 06/17/13 11:18 7439-95-406/14/13 09:3050.0 1
6020 MET ICPMS, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6020 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Arsenic, Dissolved 170 ug/L 06/17/13 12:19 7440-38-206/14/13 13:301.0 1
Lead, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 12:19 7439-92-106/14/13 13:301.0 1
2320B Alkalinity Analytical Method: SM 2320B
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 204 mg/L 06/17/13 13:0120.0 1
2540C Total Dissolved Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 418 mg/L 06/13/13 15:125.0 1
2540D Total Suspended Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids 10 mg/L 06/14/13 13:375.0 1
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days Analytical Method: EPA 300.0
Chloride 24.8 mg/L 06/20/13 12:12 16887-00-62.0 2
Sulfate 106 mg/L 06/19/13 15:26 14808-79-810.0 10
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 11 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Sample: ISR-GW1EB-130607 Lab ID: 60146628007 Collected: 06/07/13 11:50 Received: 06/11/13 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. QualReport Limit
6010 MET ICP, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Calcium, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 11:21 7440-70-206/14/13 09:30100 1
Iron, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 11:21 7439-89-606/14/13 09:3050.0 1
Magnesium, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 11:21 7439-95-406/14/13 09:3050.0 1
6020 MET ICPMS, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6020 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Arsenic, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 12:23 7440-38-206/14/13 13:301.0 1
Lead, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 12:23 7439-92-106/14/13 13:301.0 1
2320B Alkalinity Analytical Method: SM 2320B
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 ND mg/L 06/17/13 13:0920.0 1
2540C Total Dissolved Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 16.0 mg/L 06/13/13 15:125.0 1
2540D Total Suspended Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids ND mg/L 06/14/13 13:375.0 1
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days Analytical Method: EPA 300.0
Chloride ND mg/L 06/21/13 10:27 16887-00-61.0 1
Sulfate ND mg/L 06/21/13 10:27 14808-79-81.0 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 12 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Sample: ISR-GW7-130607 Lab ID: 60146628008 Collected: 06/07/13 13:35 Received: 06/11/13 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. QualReport Limit
6010 MET ICP, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Calcium, Dissolved 66900 ug/L 06/17/13 11:24 7440-70-206/14/13 09:30100 1
Iron, Dissolved 984 ug/L 06/17/13 11:24 7439-89-606/14/13 09:3050.0 1
Magnesium, Dissolved 31700 ug/L 06/17/13 11:24 7439-95-406/14/13 09:3050.0 1
6020 MET ICPMS, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6020 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Arsenic, Dissolved 75.3 ug/L 06/17/13 12:27 7440-38-206/14/13 13:301.0 1
Lead, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 12:27 7439-92-106/14/13 13:301.0 1
2320B Alkalinity Analytical Method: SM 2320B
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 206 mg/L 06/17/13 13:1320.0 1
2540C Total Dissolved Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 394 mg/L 06/13/13 15:125.0 1
2540D Total Suspended Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids 27.0 mg/L 06/14/13 13:375.0 1
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days Analytical Method: EPA 300.0
Chloride 23.5 mg/L 06/20/13 13:18 16887-00-62.0 2
Sulfate 99.3 mg/L 06/19/13 15:57 14808-79-810.0 10
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 13 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Sample: ISR-GW8-130607 Lab ID: 60146628009 Collected: 06/07/13 16:40 Received: 06/11/13 08:20 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. QualReport Limit
6010 MET ICP, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Calcium, Dissolved 62800 ug/L 06/17/13 11:27 7440-70-206/14/13 09:30100 1
Iron, Dissolved 122 ug/L 06/17/13 11:27 7439-89-606/14/13 09:3050.0 1
Magnesium, Dissolved 28300 ug/L 06/17/13 11:27 7439-95-406/14/13 09:3050.0 1
6020 MET ICPMS, Dissolved Analytical Method: EPA 6020 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Arsenic, Dissolved 67.4 ug/L 06/17/13 12:31 7440-38-206/14/13 13:301.0 1
Lead, Dissolved ND ug/L 06/17/13 12:31 7439-92-106/14/13 13:301.0 1
2320B Alkalinity Analytical Method: SM 2320B
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 219 mg/L 06/17/13 13:1720.0 1
2540C Total Dissolved Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 353 mg/L 06/13/13 15:125.0 1
2540D Total Suspended Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids 16.0 mg/L 06/14/13 13:385.0 1
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days Analytical Method: EPA 300.0
Chloride 17.5 mg/L 06/20/13 13:34 16887-00-62.0 2
Sulfate 74.8 mg/L 06/19/13 16:13 14808-79-810.0 10
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 14 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
MPRP/23072
EPA 3010
EPA 6010
6010 MET Dissolved
Associated Lab Samples:60146628001, 60146628002, 60146628003, 60146628004, 60146628005, 60146628006, 60146628007,
60146628008, 60146628009
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1204778
Associated Lab Samples: 60146628001, 60146628002, 60146628003, 60146628004, 60146628005, 60146628006, 60146628007,
60146628008, 60146628009
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Calcium, Dissolved ug/L ND 100 06/17/13 10:28
Iron, Dissolved ug/L ND 50.0 06/17/13 10:28
Magnesium, Dissolved ug/L ND 50.0 06/17/13 10:28
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1204779LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Calcium, Dissolved ug/L 1010010000 101 80-120
Iron, Dissolved ug/L 1030010000 103 80-120
Magnesium, Dissolved ug/L 996010000 100 80-120
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
1204780MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
60146846001
1204781
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD RPD
Max
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
Calcium, Dissolved ug/L M1100008175-12554 2 2010000121000129000 127000
Iron, Dissolved ug/L 10000 94 75-12592 1 20100001100020400 20200
Magnesium, Dissolved ug/L 10000 89 75-12587 1 20100001670025600 25500
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 15 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
-------------------------------
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
MPRP/23088
EPA 3010
EPA 6020
6020 MET Dissolved
Associated Lab Samples:60146628001, 60146628002, 60146628003, 60146628004, 60146628005, 60146628006, 60146628007,
60146628008, 60146628009
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1204957
Associated Lab Samples: 60146628001, 60146628002, 60146628003, 60146628004, 60146628005, 60146628006, 60146628007,
60146628008, 60146628009
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Arsenic, Dissolved ug/L ND 1.0 06/17/13 11:29
Lead, Dissolved ug/L ND 1.0 06/17/13 11:29
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1204958LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Arsenic, Dissolved ug/L 41.440 103 80-120
Lead, Dissolved ug/L 40.940 102 80-120
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
1204959MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
60146628001
1204960
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD RPD
Max
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
Arsenic, Dissolved ug/L 40 105 75-125103 2 20401.7 43.6 42.8
Lead, Dissolved ug/L 40 105 75-125103 2 2040ND42.0 41.3
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 16 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
-------------------------------
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
WET/41809
SM 2320B
SM 2320B
2320B Alkalinity
Associated Lab Samples: 60146628001
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1203890
Associated Lab Samples:60146628001
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 mg/L ND 20.0 06/13/13 08:13
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1203891LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 mg/L 453500 91 90-110
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146644002
1203894SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 mg/L 141 4 10135
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146228004
1203895SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 mg/L 558 2 10549
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 17 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
WET/41833
SM 2320B
SM 2320B
2320B Alkalinity
Associated Lab Samples: 60146628002, 60146628003, 60146628004, 60146628005
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1204688
Associated Lab Samples:60146628002, 60146628003, 60146628004, 60146628005
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 mg/L ND 20.0 06/14/13 08:57
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1204689LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 mg/L 456500 91 90-110
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146491006
1204692SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 mg/L 654 1 10648
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146598001
1204693SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 mg/L 384 1 10379
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 18 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
WET/41864
SM 2320B
SM 2320B
2320B Alkalinity
Associated Lab Samples: 60146628006, 60146628007, 60146628008, 60146628009
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1206018
Associated Lab Samples:60146628006, 60146628007, 60146628008, 60146628009
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 mg/L ND 20.0 06/17/13 12:39
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1206019LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 mg/L 471500 94 90-110
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146628006
1206022SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 mg/L 218 7 10204
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146650001
1206023SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3 mg/L 341 1 10339
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 19 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
WET/41805
SM 2540C
SM 2540C
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Associated Lab Samples: 60146628002, 60146628003, 60146628004
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1203733
Associated Lab Samples:60146628002, 60146628003, 60146628004
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L ND 5.0 06/12/13 15:52
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1203734LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 9471000 95 80-120
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146491005
1203735SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 2860 15 172450
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146542002
1203736SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 2970 D632174090
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 20 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
WET/41827
SM 2540C
SM 2540C
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Associated Lab Samples: 60146628005, 60146628006, 60146628007, 60146628008, 60146628009
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1204420
Associated Lab Samples:60146628005, 60146628006, 60146628007, 60146628008, 60146628009
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L ND 5.0 06/13/13 15:08
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1204421LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 9591000 96 80-120
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146300001
1204422SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 178 8 17192
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146542007
1204423SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 8800 D6211710900
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 21 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
WET/42683
SM 2540C
SM 2540C
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Associated Lab Samples: 60146628001
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1229875
Associated Lab Samples:60146628001
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L ND 5.0 08/02/13 10:10
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1229876LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 9601000 96 80-120
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60149911001
1229877SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 1420 1 171400
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60150044004
1229878SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 657 1 17666
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 22 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
WET/41797
SM 2540D
SM 2540D
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Associated Lab Samples: 60146628001, 60146628002, 60146628003, 60146628004
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1203411
Associated Lab Samples:60146628001, 60146628002, 60146628003, 60146628004
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Total Suspended Solids mg/L ND 5.0 06/12/13 13:13
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146628002
1203413SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Total Suspended Solids mg/L ND 25ND
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146355001
1203419SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Total Suspended Solids mg/L 30.0 6 2532.0
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 23 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
WET/41820
SM 2540D
SM 2540D
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Associated Lab Samples: 60146628005
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1204198
Associated Lab Samples:60146628005
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Total Suspended Solids mg/L ND 5.0 06/13/13 13:12
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146375002
1204199SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Total Suspended Solids mg/L 6.0 18 255.0
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146442002
1204200SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Total Suspended Solids mg/L 6.0 D629258.0
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 24 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
WET/41841
SM 2540D
SM 2540D
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Associated Lab Samples: 60146628006, 60146628007, 60146628008, 60146628009
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1205083
Associated Lab Samples:60146628006, 60146628007, 60146628008, 60146628009
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Total Suspended Solids mg/L ND 5.0 06/14/13 13:35
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146481001
1205084SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Total Suspended Solids mg/L 15.0 18 2518.0
Parameter Units
Dup
Result
Max
RPD QualifiersRPDResult
60146628009
1205085SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Total Suspended Solids mg/L 13.0 21 2516.0
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 25 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
WETA/25165
EPA 300.0
EPA 300.0
300.0 IC Anions
Associated Lab Samples:60146628001, 60146628002, 60146628003, 60146628004, 60146628005, 60146628006, 60146628008,
60146628009
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1207039
Associated Lab Samples: 60146628001, 60146628002, 60146628003, 60146628004, 60146628005, 60146628006, 60146628008,
60146628009
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Chloride mg/L ND 1.0 06/19/13 12:37
Sulfate mg/L ND 1.0 06/19/13 12:37
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1208481
Associated Lab Samples:60146628002, 60146628005, 60146628006, 60146628008, 60146628009
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Chloride mg/L ND 1.0 06/20/13 11:07
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1207040LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Chloride mg/L 4.85 96 90-110
Sulfate mg/L 4.85 96 90-110
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1208482LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Chloride mg/L 4.85 97 90-110
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
1207041MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
60146628001
1207042
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD RPD
Max
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
Chloride mg/L 50 86 64-11896 6 125036.8 80.1 85.0
Sulfate mg/L 50 94 61-119108 4 1050124172 178
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1207043MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
MSSpike
Result
60146628009
Chloride mg/L 26.510 90 64-11817.5
Sulfate mg/L 11850 86 61-11974.8
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 26 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
-------------------------------
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
WETA/25192
EPA 300.0
EPA 300.0
300.0 IC Anions
Associated Lab Samples: 60146628007
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK: 1208483
Associated Lab Samples:60146628007
Matrix: Water
Analyzed
Chloride mg/L ND 1.0 06/21/13 09:54
Sulfate mg/L ND 1.0 06/21/13 09:54
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1208484LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Chloride mg/L 4.95 99 90-110
Sulfate mg/L 5.25 104 90-110
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
1208485MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
201096885
1208486
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD RPD
Max
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
Chloride mg/L 5 102 64-11898 2 1255.3 10.4 10.2
Sulfate mg/L 5 102 61-11998 3 1051.8 6.9 6.7
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1208487MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
MSSpike
Result
201097375
Chloride mg/L 30.610 105 64-11820.1
Sulfate mg/L 38.410 105 61-11927.8
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 27 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
-------------------------------
#=QL#
QUALIFIERS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PRL - Pace Reporting Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean-Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
TNI - The NELAC Institute.
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
Revised result1e
The relative percent difference (RPD) between the sample and sample duplicate exceeded laboratory control limits.D6
Analysis conducted outside the EPA method holding time.H1
Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery.M1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 28 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=CR#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method
Analytical
Batch
60146628001 MPRP/23072 ICP/18221ISR-GW4-130604 EPA 3010 EPA 6010
60146628002 MPRP/23072 ICP/18221ISR-GW11-130605 EPA 3010 EPA 6010
60146628003 MPRP/23072 ICP/18221ISR-GW3A-130605 EPA 3010 EPA 6010
60146628004 MPRP/23072 ICP/18221ISR-GW32A-130605 EPA 3010 EPA 6010
60146628005 MPRP/23072 ICP/18221ISR-GW1BR-130606 EPA 3010 EPA 6010
60146628006 MPRP/23072 ICP/18221ISR-GW1-130607 EPA 3010 EPA 6010
60146628007 MPRP/23072 ICP/18221ISR-GW1EB-130607 EPA 3010 EPA 6010
60146628008 MPRP/23072 ICP/18221ISR-GW7-130607 EPA 3010 EPA 6010
60146628009 MPRP/23072 ICP/18221ISR-GW8-130607 EPA 3010 EPA 6010
60146628001 MPRP/23088 ICPM/2328ISR-GW4-130604 EPA 3010 EPA 6020
60146628002 MPRP/23088 ICPM/2328ISR-GW11-130605 EPA 3010 EPA 6020
60146628003 MPRP/23088 ICPM/2328ISR-GW3A-130605 EPA 3010 EPA 6020
60146628004 MPRP/23088 ICPM/2328ISR-GW32A-130605 EPA 3010 EPA 6020
60146628005 MPRP/23088 ICPM/2328ISR-GW1BR-130606 EPA 3010 EPA 6020
60146628006 MPRP/23088 ICPM/2328ISR-GW1-130607 EPA 3010 EPA 6020
60146628007 MPRP/23088 ICPM/2328ISR-GW1EB-130607 EPA 3010 EPA 6020
60146628008 MPRP/23088 ICPM/2328ISR-GW7-130607 EPA 3010 EPA 6020
60146628009 MPRP/23088 ICPM/2328ISR-GW8-130607 EPA 3010 EPA 6020
60146628001 WET/41809ISR-GW4-130604 SM 2320B
60146628002 WET/41833ISR-GW11-130605 SM 2320B
60146628003 WET/41833ISR-GW3A-130605 SM 2320B
60146628004 WET/41833ISR-GW32A-130605 SM 2320B
60146628005 WET/41833ISR-GW1BR-130606 SM 2320B
60146628006 WET/41864ISR-GW1-130607 SM 2320B
60146628007 WET/41864ISR-GW1EB-130607 SM 2320B
60146628008 WET/41864ISR-GW7-130607 SM 2320B
60146628009 WET/41864ISR-GW8-130607 SM 2320B
60146628001 WET/42683ISR-GW4-130604 SM 2540C
60146628002 WET/41805ISR-GW11-130605 SM 2540C
60146628003 WET/41805ISR-GW3A-130605 SM 2540C
60146628004 WET/41805ISR-GW32A-130605 SM 2540C
60146628005 WET/41827ISR-GW1BR-130606 SM 2540C
60146628006 WET/41827ISR-GW1-130607 SM 2540C
60146628007 WET/41827ISR-GW1EB-130607 SM 2540C
60146628008 WET/41827ISR-GW7-130607 SM 2540C
60146628009 WET/41827ISR-GW8-130607 SM 2540C
60146628001 WET/41797ISR-GW4-130604 SM 2540D
60146628002 WET/41797ISR-GW11-130605 SM 2540D
60146628003 WET/41797ISR-GW3A-130605 SM 2540D
60146628004 WET/41797ISR-GW32A-130605 SM 2540D
60146628005 WET/41820ISR-GW1BR-130606 SM 2540D
60146628006 WET/41841ISR-GW1-130607 SM 2540D
60146628007 WET/41841ISR-GW1EB-130607 SM 2540D
60146628008 WET/41841ISR-GW7-130607 SM 2540D
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 29 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
#=CR#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Pace Project No.:
Project:
60146628
IS&R
Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method
Analytical
Batch
60146628009 WET/41841ISR-GW8-130607 SM 2540D
60146628001 WETA/25165ISR-GW4-130604 EPA 300.0
60146628002 WETA/25165ISR-GW11-130605 EPA 300.0
60146628003 WETA/25165ISR-GW3A-130605 EPA 300.0
60146628004 WETA/25165ISR-GW32A-130605 EPA 300.0
60146628005 WETA/25165ISR-GW1BR-130606 EPA 300.0
60146628006 WETA/25165ISR-GW1-130607 EPA 300.0
60146628007 WETA/25192ISR-GW1EB-130607 EPA 300.0
60146628008 WETA/25165ISR-GW7-130607 EPA 300.0
60146628009 WETA/25165ISR-GW8-130607 EPA 300.0
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 08/05/2013 03:22 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9608 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
[phone]
Page 30 of 32
www.pacelabs.com
Page 31 of 32
Sample Condition Upon Receipt
WO#:60146628
II I llll 111111111111111
60146628
Client Name: Ar-di.u-5or--En')·
Courier: Fed Ex~ UPS □ USPS □ Client □ Commercial □ Pace □ Other □
Optional
Proj Due Date:
Tracking#: '6OJ, i;, "-' n '302, 3 Pace Shipping Label Used? Yes ~ No D Proi Name:
Custody Seal on Cooler/Box Present: Yes rd No D Seals intact: Yes ri No □
Packing Material: Bubble Bags □ Foam □ None □ Other l'tiZPLl-
Thermometer Used: __ Type of Ice: (i;i} Blue None D Samples received on ice, cooling process has beg un.
Cooler Temperature : D-i (circle one)
I
Date and initials of par.ion examining
Tempe ralme should be above freez in_q to 6°C contents : ,-1 t ~I 3 t ll
Chain of Custody present: lives □No □NIA 1 .
Chain of Custody filled out: iti'ves □No □NIA 2 .
Chain of Custody relinquished: □Yes iNo □NIA 3 .
Sampler name & siqnature on COC · ~Yes □No □NIA 4 .
Samples arrived within holding time: rives □No □NIA 5 .
Short Hold Time analyses (<72hr): □Yes itiNo □NIA 6 .
Rush Turn Around Time requested: □Yes ii'No □NIA 17 .
Sufficient volume: ~Yes □No □NIA 8 .
Correct containers used: ives □No □NIA
Pace containers used: 0ves □No □NIA ~-
Containers intact: i:ives □No □NIA 10.
Unpreserved 5035A soils frozen w/in 48hrs? □Yes □No iiNIA ·11 .
Filtered volume received for dissolved tests? r/Jves □No □NIA ·12 .
Sample labels match COC: ltlves □No □NIA
Includes date/time/ID/analyses Matrix: l/l:1'f" 13.
All containers needing preservation have been checked . il1Yes □No □NIA
All containers needing preservation are found to be in iYes □No □NIA compliance with EPA recommendation 14.
Exceptions: VOA, coliform, TOC, O&G, WI-ORO (water}, □Yes iiNo Initial when l~•ot # of added
Phenolics completed reservative
Trip Blank present: □Yes □No iNIA
Pace Trip Blank lot# (if purchased): 15 .
Headspace in VOA vials ( >6mm): □Yes □No gNIA
16 .
Project sampled in USDA Reoulated Area: □Yes □No iiNIA 17. List State:
Client Notification/ Resolution : Copy COC to Client?
y /~
Field Data Required? y I N
Person Contacted : c,n ~ td P J '.,"";o 11 Date/Time: lP[l;;i l3
F-KS-C-003-Rev 7, 04December2012
Pa
g
e

3
2

o
f

3
2
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY / Analytical Request Document
The Chain-0f-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All relevant fields must be completed accurately.
Section A Section B Section C
Page: of
Required Client lnf01T11ation: Required Project lnfonnation: Invoice lnfonnation:
Companyyj/J· d ~ ReponTo, /l ~err~ .....
Attention : 1371647 I) ~r,.r,.. ; A<I-• -.,.,,.,.
Ad~--, t,J,
,./ J Copy To: I Company Name: REGULATORY AGENCY 2/o J',
SAIi-J.ai« C;I,. . u:r g "1 I I 'i
Address: r NPDES r GROUND WATER r DRINKING WATER
Ema11 10: ,l~r{,._ @ / Purchase Order No.: Pace Quote r UST r RCRA r OTHER r-n---.J~t,u ,. __ Reference: -
Phone: ]Fax: I/ Project Name: ,~,-~ Pace Project Site Location ,.,,_q--,z ·l.2:1.-z. Manager:
Requested Due DatefTAT: Project Number: Pace Profile #: STATE:
Requested Analysis Filtered (Y/N) -Section D Matrix Codes 2 ~ z
Required Client Information MATRIX / CODI; .!! ::;; COLLECTED Preservatives ►
.E 0 Drinking Water DW "' u z
"' II 0 Water WT ..,
8 u COMPOSITE COMPOSITE F= (lot (/J (,, (,,U Waste Water WW !1 a, ENO/GRAB u z Product p ~ ~
START w
...J ~ Soil/Solid SL " ...J
! Cl 0 en ...
SAMPLE ID Oil OL II u ~ 0:: -Q)
Wipe WP f-UJ Ill .!:
(A-Z, 0-9/ ,·) UJ -,: z GI 0 Air AR Cl w (]._
~
"O I-
Sample IDs MUST BE UNIQUE Tissue TS 0 (]._ ::;; Q) Ill :E
Other OT t) ~ w z C: ui u ,_ 0 X w w 0 Q) 0 >, <ii
'It ti: ...J ...J t) ,,, C: iii :,
::;; (]._ (]._ eo 0 I en OJ
ai "O
:;: ::;; ::;; LJ.. C. (/) 0 .c C ·u;
UJ 0 0 m' -.c
!:: -,: -,: C: "' z OJ Q) -< Q)
~ (/) DATE TIME DATE TIME (/) 'lie :::, I I I z z ~ 0 ... 0::: Pace Project No./ Lab I.D.
1 /.SI{-Gw4 -l~O,o'I Wt' '-kl,., ;J~o 3 I ~ ~~t•• ~~ ,,-vi/
2 IS Ii! -GWJI-/JO ,,.,s 1.117' "n/2"' h3V ~ I 'Z. I ,,..n7
3 /SA. -Gt..J1A -11 tJ I. o ~ w1' t,/sA1 Jf,o:J 1 J z _., ~
4 I S-,(. 6.tJJZ.,1 -/10 ,.05 ,,,,, ~/sA..1 ''"' J I a _,..,4'
5 /rA.. -CJ...JJ BA.. -n~,_ 01 _ ~r '/4/,., l1'/1 1 I l, o,::,S"
6 IS/;_ -c:,.,. I j -/.Jo, n, W1'" "hh f>'/Ys 1 I l., oO(u
7 1rL-c;w1G1J ... IJ.o<.o~ vvf "ht.1 ltSD 3 , l, /Y7 :;-
8 lrL. ... hl .. }'1 .... 110 <, ... -, c,.r 1,,,.,1 .• 1115 J I t, ,m€
9 ,.s~ -<;;£-JS' -00,0--, r,.J ( l1--,lt1 /(,'lo 3 I ?, "v" , ,.. no'I
10
___.
11 -;9{f),
12 ~
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELINQUISHED BY/ AFFILIATION DATE TIME ACCEPTED BY/ AFFILIATION DATE TIME SAMPLE CONDITIONS
-
,_/;';. 1.[LJ{i:; /PA£€ (,,--J /-,(9 ~o O,i' '-I '1 ...-~-" {
SAMPLER NAME AND SIGNATURE C: ii; 0
ORIGINAL p o-'"'0 .l'l
K.. U>,f~ ,, z ,, 0 -E-
PRINT Name of SAMPLER: E -~~ 0 U Z "'z 0. ~~~ ~ s:: E "" o.-
7 /'7 ---
DATE Signed ,;-,;, J " "" Um E ,, _
SIGNATURE of SAMPLER: f-a:: " a,
(MM/DDIYY): Cl) en
•important Note : By signing this form you are accepting Pace's NET 30 day payment terms and agreeing to late charges or 1 5% per month for any invoices not paid within 30 days. F-ALL-Q-020rev.07, 15-May-2007