Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSHW-2024-005265 Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Fuel Western Zirconium 10,000 West 900 South Ogden, Utah 84404-9760 USA March 14, 2024 Doug Hansen Utah Divis ion of Waste Management and Radiation Control 195 North 1950 West P.O. Box 144880 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880 RE: Western Zirconium Remediation Work Plan – Area of Concern (AOC) 15 and Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) 18 UTD092024934 Dear Mr. Hansen: Western Zirconium (WZ) is pleased to provide these responses to Division comments regarding the Western Zirconium Remediation Work Plan – AOC 15 and SWMU 18 (Work Plan), dated December 2023. For ease of review, Division comments have been copied below, with WZ responses below each comment in blue italicized text. Comment 1. Section 2.3, Confirming Sampling. The text indicates that confirmation samples will only be collected for the two risk drivers (radium-226 and zirconium). However, Table 1 of Appendix A presents the AOC 15 risk summary, which shows the human health drivers for soil corrective action include arsenic, hexachlorobenzene, lead-210, radium-226, radium-228, thorium-228, thorium-230, and zirconium. The footnote on Table 1 indicates that radddium-226 and zirconium each contribute around 30% of the total risk. While the investigation data may show radium-226 and zirconium contributing to 50% or more to the total risk, Utah Administrative Code (UAC) R315-101-5 requires evaluation of cumulative risk. Cumulative risk includes risk associated with all potential contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) in the site media. Further, Section 4 of the Division’s Technical Guide for Risk Assessments (August 2, 2005(Utah.gov)) clearly states that reduction of COPCs may not be conducted through a simple comparison to a screening level or based on frequency of detection. The confirmation sampling and subsequent confirmation risk assessment must include all the contaminants listed in Table 1 of Appendix A to include arsenic, hexachlorobenzene, lead-210, radium-226, radium-228, thorium-228, thorium-230, and zirconium. Also, revise Table 2, AOC Cleanup Levels, to include appropriate screening levels, for all COPCs. Response 1: Western Zirconium will update analytical constituent s in Section 2.3 of the Remediation Work Plan to include arsenic, hexachlorobenzene, lead-210, radium-226, radium-228, thorium-228, thorium- 230, and zirconium. Table 2 of the work plan will also be updated with these analytes. Table 2 will be updated with EPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs). A risk assessment work plan will be prepared for UDEQ review and approval. A human health risk assessment will be conducted on existing data to better understand current risk levels and to better define excavation volumes and the need for additional samples. After excavation and prior to placement of fill, a human health risk assessment will be conducted on confirmation data to confirm we meet acceptable risks levels. Comment 2. Section 2.3, Confirmation Sampling. This section only indicates that confirmation will be compared to cleanup levels and regional screening levels. Please clarify the text that a post remedial Page 2 of 6 action risk assessment will be conducted to confirm residual levels of contamination are protective of all identified receptors. Response 2: A post remedial action risk assessment will be conducted after sampling. A risk assessment work plan be prepared and submitted to UDEQ for review and approval. Comment 3. Section 2.3, Confirmation Sampling. This section does not address ecological risk. The Corrective Measures Study (CMS) in Appendix A indicates that ecological risks were within acceptable risk levels. However, a demonstration that post corrective measures result in concentration protective of ecological receptors must also be demonstrated, in accordance with UAC R315-101. In lieu of conducting a final ecological risk assessment, the Work Plan should clearly discuss that a goal of remedial actions is to remove available habitat and that an ecological waiver is requested. Response 3: An ecological waiver will be request ed for AOC-15 in the updated Work Plan. Comment 4. Section 2.3, Confirmation Sampling. The Work Plan states that confirmation samples will be collected from locations outlined in the CMS and include five locations. As the above comments discuss the evaluation of risk, number of sample locations must be adequate to provide the required data for statistical derivation of a revised exposure point concentration (EPC) for the risk assessment analysis. Please propose a minimum number of eight sample locations. Response 4: Western Zirconium will add additional confirmation sampling locations to the R emediation Work Plan. The need for additional confirmation samples will be evaluated and a minimum of 8 confirmation samples will be added to the Remediation Work Plan. Comment 5. Section 2.3 and 2.4, Confirmation Sampling and Analytes and Analytical Methods. The Work Plan references risk-based clean up levels that were developed for the chemicals. These levels were developed in 2012 and will need to be revised based on current toxicity information. Response 5: Western Zirconium will update the risk-based clean up levels for AOC-15 and SWMU- 18. A risk assessment work plan will be prepared for UDEQ review that will discuss current toxicity information . Comment 6. Section 2.4, Analytes and Analytical Methods. Revised Table 2 to include the laboratory methods for all COPCs. In addition, please include the method detection limits (MDLs) for each COPC demonstrating the levels are below the cleanup levels. Note that hexachlorobenzene is best analyzed using Method 8270 for semi-volatile organics; therefore, trip blanks are not required. Response 6: Western Zirconium will update Table 2 of the R emediation Work Plan to include methods, and method detection levels. Hexachlorobenzene will be analyzed by USEPA method 8270. Comment 7. Section 2.5, Results. The Work Plan states that if concentrations exceed the lowest cleanup levels, further assessment will be conducted when the facility is decommissioned. In accordance with UAC R315-101, use of engineering controls, such as the HPED liner and clean fill, may only be used if risks are within the acceptable risk range. The confirmation data must be evaluated, and a risk assessment conducted to demonstrate that the residual contamination, prior to implementing the engineering controls, is protective of both the on-site and construction workers. I f results are within the acceptable limits (equal to below 1E-04 for cancer risk and equal to or below 1 for noncancer), then any excess risk may be assessed at decommissioning. Page 3 of 6 Further, the Work Plan does not discuss controls that will be used to ensure the corrective actions will be maintained to ensure protection of human health and ecological risk. For example, discuss inspection, periodic vegetation removal, etc. Response 7: Western Zirconium will add an operation and maintenance section to the Remediation Work Plan to address inspection, erosion of cap material, mowing of vegetation, and spraying of phragmites to reduce habitat . A risk assessment work plan will be prepared for UDEQ review to address the post excavation risk assessment. Comment 8. Section 2.8, Reporting. Please include the analytical data package in the corrective Measures Implementation (CMI) Report in addition to the summary of the excavation grading, pipe installation, results of confirmation sampling, as -built documentation, photographs, and field notes. Response 8: Western Zirconium will include analytical data packages and data validation report s in the Corrective Measure Implementation Report. Comment 9. General. In order to ensure protection of birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, corrective measures should be completed prior to nesting or after fledging (spring to early summer), to ensure minimum impact to receptors. Response 9: Western Zirconium will make the necessary changes to the Remediation Work Plan and plans and specifications to restrict construction activities from March 15 through July 15 to accommodate nesting and fledging season. Comment 10. As noted in the CMS for SWMU 18, risk to soil were not evaluated due to the presence of surface water. It is noted that contamination of surface water was noted. As part of the corrective measures for SWMU 18, surface water is to be mitigated using measures to prevent or minimize the daylighting of groundwater. As both the surface water and groundwater have associated contamination, it is reasonable to assume that the soil that has come into contact with water is likely contaminated. Soil data are needed to ensure that risk to exposure to soil post corrective measures is within acceptable levels and protective of both human health and the environment. Response 10: SWMU 18 consist of two concrete tanks located in a concrete secondary containment structure. Groundwater and stormwater do not enter the secondary containment structure of SWMU 18. There is a small stormwater ditch that conveys storm water to AOC-15 and is located on the northeast corner of the secondary containment structure. Groundwater historically daylighted into this small stormwater ditch. Groundwater in this area is present at or below the bottom of this stormwater ditch. Groundwater in this area will continue to be monitored through the Plant Area and Pond Area monitoring Programs. After construction, stormwater water may be present in this stormwater ditch during precipitation event and will flow into SWMU 44 through the future AOC-15 stormwater pipeline. Future interactions between groundwater and surface water near the northeast corner of SWMU 18 will be eliminated or greatly reduced after AOC-15 construction is complete. Three soil sample locations will be added to the work plan from the area outside the secondary containment structure. One soil sample location will be located near the southern portion of stormwater Page 4 of 6 ditch near the northeast border with SWMU-18. Two soil samples will be collected from the slope embankment above the concrete secondary containment structure near the influent lines to SWMU-18. An ecological waiver will be request ed for SWMU -18 in the updated Work Plan Please let me know if you have any additional questions or comments . I can be reached at 801-247-0239. Thank You, Eric Dodson Principal Environmental Engineer Western Zirconium CC: Lawrence Cannon, AECOM Paige Walton, UDEQ Karen Wallner, UDEQ