DERR-2024-010077

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page i of iii July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com

849 West Levoy, Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT. 84123 p | 801.261.3336

FINAL FOR AGENCY RECORD

POST-REMOVAL SAMPLING REPORT
LARK MONOFILL SUBSTATION PARCEL
VICINITY 7020 WEST AND 11800 SOUTH
SOUTH JORDAN, UTAH

KLEINFELDER PROJECT NO.: 20201466.004A

JULY 1, 2021

Copyright 2021 Kleinfelder
All Rights Reserved

ONLY THE CLIENT OR ITS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES MAY USE THIS DOCUMENT AND ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC
PROJECT FOR WHICH THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page ii of iii July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
A Report Prepared for:

Mr. Doug Young
Executive Director
SOJO118, LLC
6150 South Redwood Road Suite 150
Taylorsville UT 84123

FINAL FOR AGENCY RECORD

POST-REMOVAL SAMPLING REPORT
LARK MONOFILL SUBSTATION PARCEL
VICINITY 7020 WEST AND 11800 SOUTH
SOUTH JORDAN, UTAH

Prepared by:

________________________________
Dylan Pike
Staff Professional II

________________________________
Corinne Hillard, PG
Senior Project Manager

KLEINFELDER
849 West Levoy Dr., Suite 200
Salt Lake City, Utah 84123
Phone: [phone]

July 1, 2021
Kleinfelder Project No.: 20201466.004A

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page iii of iii July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
____________________________________________________________________________

SECTION PAGE
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1
BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 1
SITE DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 1
CONSTITUENTS OF CONCERN ........................................................................ 1
KENNECOTT SOUTH ZONE ACTION LEVELS .................................................. 2
METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 3
REMOVAL ACTIVITIES ....................................................................................... 3
POST-REMOVAL SAMPLE COLLECTION .......................................................... 4
ANALYTICAL RESULTS ................................................................................................ 5
DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND QA/QC ................................................................. 6
CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................. 7
LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................. 8

FIGURES
1 Site Vicinity Map
2 Substation Location and Site Characterization Results
3 Post-Removal Sample Locations

TABLES
1 Soil Analytical Results

APPENDICES
A Standard Operating Procedures
B Photographs and Truck Logs
C Laboratory Analytical Reports and Chain of Custody Documentation

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page 1 of 8 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
INTRODUCTION

BACKGROUND
Kleinfelder has prepared this report to document the removal of metals-impacted soil from a
portion of the South Valley Water Reclamation property, (the Lark Monofill), which is located
northeast of the intersection of Highway 111 (Bacchus Highway) and 11800 South in
South Jordan, Utah (see Figure 1). Shallow soil in portions of the Lark Monofill have been
impacted with elevated metals via surface water drainages that originated in the mining areas to
the west. Metals-impacted soils were identified along the Lark Monofill east fence line, adjacent
to the Bastian Ditch Drainage area located on Daybreak property, and within the Bastian Ditch
channel that runs north-south through the center of the Lark Monofill. Kleinfelder began the soil
removal action in May 2021 in the southeast corner of the Lark Monofill. The removal activities
were conducted in accordance with the Lark Monofill Bastian Ditch Remedial Action Work Plan
(Kleinfelder Document No. SLC20R107223_R3 dated April 26, 2021).

SITE DESCRIPTION
Rocky Mountain Power (RMP) intends to construct a substation on an approximate 4-acre parcel
in the southeast corner of the Lark Monofill, referred herein as the “Site”. The Site boundaries are
indicated on Figure 2. Due to the pending property transfer and substation construction, RMP has
requested the soil removal activities conducted on that parcel be documented and submitted for
regulatory closure prior to completion of the entire Lark Monofill corrective action. This report
documents the soil removal activities, confirmation sampling procedures, and laboratory
analytical results for the RMP parcel.

CONSTITUENTS OF CONCERN
The contaminants of concern (COCs) for the Site are lead and arsenic in soil, where the Bastian
Ditch Drainage has impacted the Site near surface soils.

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page 2 of 8 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
KENNECOTT SOUTH ZONE ACTION LEVELS
A 2015 joint Technical Memorandum prepared by the Utah Division of Environmental Response
and Remediation (DERR) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 8 (the
Agencies) established soil action levels for the Kennecott North and South Zone Operable Units,
including the following standards for the Bastian Ditch (OU5):

• Agricultural Land Use Standards – 8,500 mg/kg lead and 100 mg/kg arsenic,
• Industrial Land Use Standards – 4,414 mg/kg lead and 261 mg/kg arsenic,
• Recreational Land Use Standards - 2,207 mg/kg lead and 283 mg/kg arsenic,
• Unrestricted Land Use Standards - 500 mg/kg lead and 50 mg/kg arsenic.

Due to the undeveloped nature of the area at the time the standards were established, commercial
and residential land use standards were not established for most of the Kennecott Operable Units.
SVWR requested the assignment of the same Commercial Land Use Standards for the
Lark property that have been established for the other nearby Bastian Ditch-impacted areas. The
DERR concurred with the use of the Daybreak Commercial Land Use Standards for the
Lark removal action in their comments to the draft Lark Remedial Action Work Plan dated
April 8, 2021.

Those standards are:

• Commercial Land Use Standards – 2,000 mg/kg lead and 450 mg/kg arsenic

To allow for maximum flexibility in Site development, SOJO118, LLC intends to perform any
necessary corrective action in compliance with the Unrestricted Land Use Standards.

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page 3 of 8 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
METHODOLOGY

On May 17 through 25, 2021 Kleinfelder directed Richins Excavating to remove soil contaminated
with lead and arsenic at concentrations exceeding the Unrestricted Land Use Standards from the
Site. Excavation and sampling activities were conducted according to the project workplan and
following the standard operating procedures included in Appendix A. The remedial excavation
and soil sampling methodologies are described below.

REMOVAL ACTIVITIES
Richins Excavating, under Kleinfelder’s direction, used an excavator to remove surficial soils
impacted with lead and arsenic at concentrations exceeding the Unrestricted Land Use
Standards. Tasks related to the removal action are described below.

• Blue Stakes of Utah was notified prior to the removal operations to identify and mark the
location of buried utilities.
• Richins Excavating secured a land disturbance permit from the City of South Jordan.
• Richins Excavating prepared a construction stormwater pollution protection plan
(SWPPP).
• Water trucks were used to control dust during loading and on the dirt haul roads.
• A track hoe was used to excavate the soil. It was fitted with a flat blade to limit mixing with
the underlying soil during excavation. The soil was hauled to a commercially platted parcel
in the southwest corner of the Lark Monofill.
• Post-removal confirmation soil samples were collected in accordance with the work plan.

The soil was removed in approximately six-inch intervals to allow Kleinfelder to screen the in-situ
soil with an x-ray fluorescence (XRF) detector. Readings were taken continuously from the post-
removal surfaces, including both the floor and sidewalls of the excavation. XRF readings
indicating the metals concentrations were likely to exceed the applicable cleanup action level
(i.e., concentrations of at least 70% of the Unrestricted Land Use Standards—350 mg/kg lead

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page 4 of 8 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
and 35 mg/kg arsenic), were removed as “impacted”. Based on the prior Site characterization and
the XRF screening during removal, the excavated soils contained lead and arsenic at
concentrations below the Commercial Land Use Standards and were hauled to a commercially
platted parcel in the southwest corner of the Lark Monofill, in accordance with the DERR-approved
work plan. Approximately 4,050 yards of soil were removed from the RMP parcel. A log of the
haul trucks is provided in Appendix B. In general, the excavation extended 2.5 to 3 feet below
ground surface and from the east property line to approximately 15 to 30 feet west of the property
line. The approximate boundary of the excavated area is shown on Figure 2.

POST-REMOVAL SAMPLE COLLECTION
On May 25, 2021, following soil screening and excavation of impacted soils, Kleinfelder collected
four multi-point composite soil samples to document the lead and arsenic concentrations
remaining in Site soils. Two post-removal soil samples were collected from the floor of the
excavation and were given an “FG” prefix. Two samples were collected from the sidewalls of the
excavation and were given an “FS” prefix. The sample locations were surveyed using a
hand-held global positioning system (GPS) unit capable of sub-meter accuracy. Photographs
taken of the sample locations are provided in Appendix B.

The samples were collected in accordance with the project work plan. In general, the composite
post-removal ground surface samples were collected with aliquots spaced at 40-foot linear
intervals, and 10 to 15 feet laterally, representing approximately 200 linear feet of the excavation.
Post-removal excavation sidewall samples were collected with aliquots spaced at 40-foot intervals
representing 200 linear feet. The sidewall samples were collected as a 6-inch vertical sample
from the soil interval that demonstrated the highest metals concentrations prior to removal. The
sample numbers, description, location, and aliquots are provided in Table 1. The sample locations
are shown on Figure 3, Post-Removal Sample Locations.

Kleinfelder personnel used a clean stainless-steel trowel to collect each aliquot of soil for each
composite sample. The sampling equipment was decontaminated with non-phosphate detergent
solution wash and distilled water rinse between each composite sample. Each soil sample was
submitted under chain of custody documentation to Pace Analytical National Center for Testing
and Innovation (Pace) in Mount Juliet, Tennessee for analysis of lead and arsenic by EPA
methods SW846-3050B (sample preparation) and SW846-6010B (sample analysis).

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page 5 of 8 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The laboratory reported concentrations of lead ranging from 84.7 mg/kg in sample FS-2 to
174 mg/kg in sample FS-1. Reported concentrations of arsenic ranged from 11.6 mg/kg in sample
FS-2 to 15.9 mg/kg in sample FS-1. The analytical results were compared to the Unrestricted
Land Use Standards for lead and arsenic of 500 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg, respectively. No samples
collected during this remedial action exceed the Unrestricted Land Use Standards for lead or
arsenic. The laboratory analytical results for this assessment are summarized in Table 1. Copies
of the laboratory analytical reports and chain of custody documentation are included in
Appendix C.

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page 6 of 8 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND QA/QC

Quality Assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) samples were proposed to be collected at a rate
of 10 percent of the total samples. Kleinfelder’s remedial action is ongoing, and because only four
samples were collected in the substation area, no QA/QC samples were collected or submitted
for laboratory analysis. As the larger remedial action at the Lark Monofill continues, Kleinfelder
will collect and analyze QA/QC samples according to the workplan.

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page 7 of 8 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
CONCLUSIONS

Following the remedial action at the Site, Kleinfelder collected composite soil samples to
document the concentrations of lead and arsenic remaining in Site soils. Four composite soil
samples were collected and submitted to Pace for laboratory analysis of lead and arsenic. Based
on the laboratory analytical results, the four post-removal soil samples did not contain lead or
arsenic at concentrations exceeding the Unrestricted Land Use Standards. These results
demonstrate the impacted soil has been removed from the RMP parcel in compliance with the
project work plan. On behalf of SWWR and Rocky Mountain Power, Kleinfelder requests a no
further action/remedial closure finding from the Agencies for the RMP parcel soils.

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page 8 of 8 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
LIMITATIONS

This work was performed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily
exercised by other members of Kleinfelder’s profession practicing in the same locality, under
similar conditions and at the date the services are provided. Our conclusions, opinions and
recommendations are based on a limited number of observations and data. It is possible that
conditions could vary between or beyond the data evaluated. Kleinfelder makes no other
representation, guarantee or warranty, express or implied, regarding the services, communication
(oral or written), report, opinion, or instrument of service provided.

Kleinfelder offers various levels of investigative and engineering services to suit the varying needs
of different clients. It should be recognized that definition and evaluation of geologic and
environmental conditions are a difficult and inexact science. Judgments leading to conclusions
and recommendations are generally made with incomplete knowledge of the subsurface
conditions present due to the limitations of data from field studies. Although risk can never be
eliminated, more detailed and extensive studies yield more information, which may help
understand and manage the level of risk. Since detailed study and analysis involves greater
expense, our clients participate in determining levels of service that provide adequate information
for their purposes at acceptable levels of risk. More extensive studies, including subsurface
studies or field tests, should be performed to reduce uncertainties.

This report may be used only by the client and only for the purposes stated within a reasonable
time from its issuance. land use, site conditions (both on- and off-site), or other factors may
change over time, and additional work may be required. Non-compliance with any of these
requirements by the client or anyone else, unless specifically agreed to in advance by Kleinfelder
in writing will release Kleinfelder from any liability resulting from the use of this report by any
unauthorized party.
Fi
g
u
r
e
s
TransJordan Landfill
11800 SOUTH
BACCH
U
S

H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
¬«111
SITE VICINITY MAP
APPROXIMATELY 180 ACRES
SOUTH VALLEY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY
NORTHEAST CORNER OF
HIGHWAY 111 AND 11800 SOUTH
SOUTH JORDAN, UTAH
PROJECT NO.:
FILE NAME:
FIGURE
1DRAWN:
CHECKED BY:
The information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from a variety of
sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleinfelder makes no representations or
warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of
such information. This document is not intended for use as a land survey product nor is it
designed or intended as a construction design document. The use or misuse of the information
contained on this graphic representation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information.
DRAWN BY:
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Explanation
Approximate Site Boundary
Basemap: USA Topo Maps map service via ESRI
Inset: National Geographic World Map
map service via ESRI
Locations are Approximate£
Excav_Fig1.mxd
ProjectLocation
SA
L
T

L
A
K
E

C
I
T
Y
,

U
T
L:
\
2
0
2
0
\
2
0
2
0
1
4
6
6
.
0
0
1
A

-

L
a
r
k

M
o
n
o
f
i
l
l
\
2
.
0

T
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l

I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
\
2
.
8

G
I
S
PL
O
T
T
E
D
:

6
/
3
/
2
0
2
1
,

K
H
a
g
a
n
20201466
JUN 2021
CH
KFH
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
BA
C
C
H
U
S

H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
UV111
11800 SOUTH KE-80
KE-79
KE-78
KE-77
KE-76
KE-75
KE-74
KE-73
KE-72
KE-71 KE-70
KE-69
KE-68
KE-67
KE-65
KE-64
KE-63
KE-62
KE-61
KE-60
KE-59
KE-58
KE-57
KE-56
KE-55
KE-54
KE-53
KE-52
KE-51
KE-50
KE-49
KE-48
KE-46
KE-45
KE-44
KE-42
KE-41
KE-40
KE-86
KE 85
KE-84KE-83KE-82KE-81
KE-38
KE-39
KE-47
KE-66 KE-43
KE-59BD
KE-57BD
KE-54BD
KE-48BD
KE-51BD
KS-7
KS-2 KS-6KS-4
KS-1 KS-5KS-3
KP-9
KP-8
KP-6
KP-5
KP-4
KP-7
KP-1
KP-24
KP-23
KP-22
KP-19
KP-12
KP-21
KP-42
KP-41
KP-18
KP-20
KP-10
KP-11
KP-2C
KP-3C
KP-13
KP-25
KP-14
KP-15
KP-49
KP-50
KP-48
KP-45
KP-46
KP-47
KP-44
KP-43
KP-27
KP-29
KP-30
KP-31
KP-32
KP-33
KP-34
KP-35
KP-36
KP-37
KP-38
KP-39
KP-40
KP-28
KP-16
KP-26
KP-17
KT-7
KT-11
KT-1
KT-4
KT-5
KT-8
KT-6
KT-9
KT-13
KT-14
KT-12
KT-10
SUBSTATION LOCATION ANDSITE CHARACTERIZATION RESULTS
SOUTH VALLEY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 111 AND 11800 SOUTH
SOUTH JORDAN, UTAH
FIGURE2
Excav_Fig2.mxd
FILE NAME:
The information included on this graphic representation has been
compiled from a variety of sources and is subject to change
without notice. Kleinfelder makes no representations or warranties,
express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or
rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended
for use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a
construction design document. The use or misuse of the
information contained on this graphic representation is at the sole
risk of the party using or misusing the information.
CHCHECKED BY:
KFHDRAWN BY:
JUN 2021DRAWN:
20201466PROJECT NO:
0 200 400Feet£Locations are Approximate
www.kleinfelder.com
SA
L
T

L
A
K
E

C
I
T
Y
,

U
T
L:
\
2
0
2
0
\
2
0
2
0
1
4
6
6
.
0
0
1
A

-

L
a
r
k

M
o
n
o
f
i
l
l
\
2
.
0

T
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l

I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
\
2
.
8

G
I
S
PL
O
T
T
E
D
:

6
/
2
9
/
2
0
2
1
,

K
H
a
g
a
n
Aerial imagery: ESRI World
Imagery, Metro Maxar
6/1/2020.
Explanation
!(Lead and Arsenic < Unrestricted Land Use
!(Lead and Arsenic > Unrestricted Land Use Standards
but < Commercial Land Use Standards
!(Lead and Arsenic > Commercial Land Use
Main Bastian Ditch
Side Drainages Visible on Historical Aerial
Bastian Ditch Drainage Sediments with Elevated Metals
Left Outside Lark Fenceline During Bastian Ditch
Drainage Excavation by Rio Tinto
Proposed Substation
Commercial Development
Bastian Ditch Drainage KUC Excavation
Approximate Site
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
FS-2
FS-1
FG-1
FG-2
POST-REMOVAL SAMPLES
SOUTH VALLEY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY
NORTHEAST CORNER OF
HIGHWAY 111 AND 11800 SOUTH
SOUTH JORDAN, UTAH
PROJECT NO.:
FILE NAME:
FIGURE
3DRAWN:
CHECKED BY:
The information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from a variety of
sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleinfelder makes no representations or
warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of
such information. This document is not intended for use as a land survey product nor is it
designed or intended as a construction design document. The use or misuse of the information
contained on this graphic representation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information.
DRAWN BY:
0 40 80
Feet
Explanation
!(Post-Removal Excavation Floor Samples
!(Post-Removal Excavation Sidewall Samples
Bastian Ditch Drainage Sediments with Elevated Metals
Left Outside Lark Fenceline During Bastian Ditch
Drainage Excavation by Rio Tinto
Proposed Substation Parcel
Excavation Area, June 2021
Bastian Ditch Drainage KUC Excavation Area
Approximate Site Boundary
Aerial: ESRI World Imagery,
Salt Lake County 10/15/2019.
Locations are Approximate£
Excav_Fig3.mxdSA
L
T

L
A
K
E

C
I
T
Y
,

U
T
L:
\
2
0
2
0
\
2
0
2
0
1
4
6
6
.
0
0
1
A

-

L
a
r
k

M
o
n
o
f
i
l
l
\
2
.
0

T
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l

I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
\
2
.
8

G
I
S
PL
O
T
T
E
D
:

6
/
2
9
/
2
0
2
1
,

K
H
a
g
a
n
20201466
JUN 2021
CH
KFH
Ta
b
l
e
s
FG-1 05/21/21 Collected from the post-removal
ground surface.
0-3 below
post-removal surface
11-point composite sample with
subsamples spaced 40 ft apart 12.0 105
FG-2 05/21/21 Collected from the post-removal
ground surface.
0-3 below
post-removal surface
10-point composite sample with
subsamples spaced 40 ft apart 11.7 95.2
FS-1 05/21/21
Collected from the west sidewall of the
removal excavation at the interval with
the highest impacts prior to soil removal.
24-30 bgs 5-point composite sample with
subsamples spaced 40 ft apart 15.9 174
FS-2 05/21/21
Collected from the west sidewall of the
removal excavation at the interval with
the highest impacts prior to soil removal.
24-30 bgs 6-point composite sample with
subsamples spaced 40 ft apart 11.6 84.7
50 500
Notes and Abbreviations:
bold = sample result exceeds the Unrestricted Land Use Standards
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
bgs = below ground surface
(1) FG = post removal ground surface sample, FS = Post-removal excavation sidewall sample
Unrestricted Land-Use Standards:
Sample Type/Purpose
TABLE 1
Post-Removal Soil Analytical Results
SE Corner of Lark Monofill
Sample ID(1)Date
Collected
Arsenic
(mg/kg)
Lead
(mg/kg)
Substation Parcel
Sample Depth
(inches bgs)Sample Arrangement
20201466.004A/SLC21R127561
© 2021 Kleinfelder
Table 1
Page 1 of 1
July 1, 2021
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t

A

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
APPENDIX A

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page A-1 of A-3 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION

Decontamination procedures will be used to prevent cross-contamination of samples.
Decontamination procedures will be established for each site based on the contaminants of
concern to be sampled and the degree of hazard associated with the site. Decontamination
procedures will be reviewed and approved by the Site Health and Safety Manager. The following
procedure contains standard decontamination protocols, suitable for most sites.

All non-disposable sampling equipment will be decontaminated prior to use and between samples
as follows:

• Remove Gross Contaminants – Equipment will be scrubbed using a water/detergent
solution and stiff brush until visible contaminants are removed. The water will be changed
as necessary, daily at a minimum.
• Wash with Alconox soap or similar detergent – An Alconox wash will be prepared as
indicated on the product labeling, typically mixing 1 to 1.5 tablespoons of Alconox per
gallon of water. The water will be changed as necessary, daily at a minimum.
• Water Rinse – Equipment will be rinsed with clear potable water. The water will be
changed as necessary, daily at a minimum.
• Deionized Water Rinse – Deionized water will be used as a final rinse for all equipment.
The water may be poured or sprayed, or the equipment submerged.
• Gloves – Sampling personnel will change into a new pair of chemical-resistant gloves
between samples and discard the previous pair.

The backhoe bucket will be decontaminated prior to use using a high-pressure washer.
Decontamination water will be dispersed on the ground surface and allowed to infiltrate near the
source. Between trench/sample locations, the backhoe bucket will be shaken and/or swept to
remove loose dirt.

SAMPLE COLLECTION

Sample containers, preservation techniques and holding times will be consistent with EPA
SW-846 guidelines. Soil samples to be analyzed for metals will be placed in plastic Ziplock bags.
No preservation or sample cooling is necessary for lead and arsenic analysis and the holding time
is 6 months. Sample intervals will be selected based on the project sampling plan.

Soil samples will be collected using disposable plastic or decontaminated hand tools. These tools
may include one or more of the following:
• Disposable plastic spoon, trowel or cup
• Stainless steel spoon, trowel or cup
• Clean, disposable gloves (vinyl, latex, nitrile)

Only disposable plastic or decontaminated stainless-steel tools will be used to sample the
material. Reusable sampling tools will be decontaminated prior to use following the procedures
described in the “Equipment Decontamination” SOP.

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page A-2 of A-3 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
Grab Samples
A soil sample will be collected at the selected depths with a spoon, trowel, or chemical-resistant
gloves. The material will be screened with the appropriate direct reading instrument, such as a
PID or XRF, and the reading will be recorded on the log form or in the field notebook. The portion
of the sample collected for chemical analysis will be transferred immediately into the appropriate
sample container using decontaminated equipment, clean disposable spoons or equipment, or by
hand wearing new disposable chemical-resistant gloves. Avoid gravels and rock fragments when
filling soil sample containers. If the sample is to be analyzed for volatile organics, the container
will be completely filled with soil to minimize headspace. The container will be labeled
appropriately and immediately stored in an iced cooler to maintain a temperature of 4° Celsius
(if cooling is required for the analytical method).

Composite Soil Samples
Composite samples will be prepared by placing equal amounts of soil in a stainless steel bowl or
clean plastic bag using a stainless steel spoon or by hand wearing new chemical-resistant gloves.
The composite sample will be comprised of a minimum of five aliquots. The sample will be
homogenized with a stainless steel spoon or gloved hand. The homogenized soil will be packaged
in a laboratory-supplied sample container, labeled appropriately, and placed in an iced cooler to
maintain a temperature of 4° Celsius, if appropriate for the analytical method.

A sufficient quantity of soil will be collected for each sample to allow for additional laboratory
analysis of lead and arsenic if requested. The samples will be held at the laboratory for 60 days
after analysis to accommodate possible additional analysis.

Soil sample material will be homogenized prior to analysis. The sample will be placed in a new,
re-sealable plastic bag. Large debris and rocks will be removed, and the sample will be
homogenized by kneading the soil within the bag. Clay soils, if encountered, will be thoroughly
mixed to the extent practicable.

Sample Identification and Labeling
To prevent misidentification of samples each sample container will be labeled with indelible ink.
The following information will be recorded on the sample container:
• Project name or number
• Sample identification number
• Sample depth
• Date and time of collection

Samples will be transported in laboratory-supplied coolers and stored on ice to maintain a
temperature between 2 and 6 degree Centigrade, if sample cooling is required for the analytical
method.

DOCUMENTATION AND SAMPLE HANDLING

Field Records
Field activities will be recorded on a Daily Field Report (DFR) form or in a field log book by
on-site personnel during all sampling activities. All notes/comments and data generated during
the project will be recorded on the DFR or log book. The general information recorded for each
day’s sampling event includes:

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 Page A-3 of A-3 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
• Date
• Name of overall sampling event and project number
• Sampling personnel
• Climatic conditions
• Field equipment and subcontractor personnel
• Daily operations and observations
• Any deviation from the sampling protocol will be formally noted along with the names of
visiting personnel and any unusual circumstances pertinent to the sampling effort.

Sample Control Log
For each sample collected, the following will be recorded in a sample control log or DFR:
• Sample identification number
• Location with measurements
• Sample time
• Sample type (grab, composite, etc.)
• Field observations Map or diagram

Boring and Trench Logs
Subsurface conditions encountered will be described in the boring or trench log using the unified
soil classification system. The logs will include the following, as applicable:
• GPS Coordinate
• Color/discoloration
• Sample location/depth
• Drawing of the trench dimensions and observations
• Any other observations pertinent to the sampling effort

Photographs
Photographs may be taken of the trenches and other investigation features as deemed
appropriate to document the field activities. A photograph log will be maintained on the DFR. The
log will contain the following information:
• Photograph identification number
• Identification of site
• Date of photograph

Chain of Custody
Sample chain of custody will be maintained for all samples collected. A chain of custody record
will be filled out and will accompany every set of samples in order to establish the documentation
necessary to trace sample possession from the time of collection. Samples will remain in the
possession of the sampler at all times, or in a locked facility until delivery to the analytical
laboratory.

Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

B

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
APPENDIX B

PHOTOGRAPHS AND TRUCK LOGS

Sample Information Sheet
by  Ted Wallace
Lark Monofill Environmental
Consulting
20201466.001A
Hillard, Corinne
Sample Information
Sample ID:FG-1
Date/Time:June 16, 2021 10:01 AM
Location:East northeast fence line
Coordinates:40.537068, -112.057899
Represents:
Configuration:11 -point composite sample with subsamples spaced 10 feet
apart
Sample Purpose:Floor Confirmation Sampling.
Notes:
Photos
North facing photo at FG-1 excavation ground surface.South facing photo of FG-1 excavation ground surface.
/FieldNet/Service_Lines/Contaminated_Lands/Env_trench_remediation_qc/even
t_id_12 Page 4 of 8 Pages7/1/2021 5:53:05 PM
40 x 10 feet.
In-situ material from 0-3 inches below post-removal ground surface. Excavation depth ~2.5 ft.
May 21, 2021
Sample Information Sheet
by  Ted Wallace
Lark Monofill Environmental
Consulting
20201466.001A
Hillard, Corinne
Sample Information
Sample ID:FG-2
Date/Time:June 16, 2021 10:29 AM
Location:East northeast fence line
Coordinates:40.537751, -112.057952
Represents:
Configuration:10 -point composite sample with subsamples spaced 10 feet
apart
Sample Purpose:Floor Confirmation Sampling.
Notes:
Photos
North facing photo of FG-2 excavation ground surface.South facing photo of FG-2 excavation ground surface.
/FieldNet/Service_Lines/Contaminated_Lands/Env_trench_remediation_qc/even
t_id_12 Page 6 of 8 Pages7/1/2021 5:53:05 PM
40 x 10 feet.
In-situ material from 0-3 inches below post-removal ground surface. Excavation depth ~2.5 ft.
May 21, 2021
Sample Information Sheet
by  Ted Wallace
Lark Monofill Environmental
Consulting
20201466.001A
Hillard, Corinne
Sample Information
Sample ID:FS-1
Date/Time:June 16, 2021 10:20 AM
Location:East northeast fence line
Coordinates:40.537123, -112.057904
Represents:
Configuration:5 -point composite sample with subsamples spaced 40 feet
apart
Sample Purpose:Wall Confirmation Sampling.
Notes:
Photos
North facing photo of FS-2 excavation sidewall.South facing photo of FS-2 excavation sidewall.
/FieldNet/Service_Lines/Contaminated_Lands/Env_trench_remediation_qc/even
t_id_12 Page 5 of 8 Pages7/1/2021 5:53:05 PM
In-situ material from 24-30 inches below ground on excavation west sidewall. Excavation depth 2.5 ft.
May 21, 2021
Sample Information Sheet
by  Ted Wallace
Lark Monofill Environmental
Consulting
20201466.001A
Hillard, Corinne
Sample Information
Sample ID:FS-2
Date/Time:June 16, 2021 12:29 PM
Location:East northeast fence line
Coordinates:40.537669, -112.058003
Represents:
Configuration:5 -point composite sample with subsamples spaced 40 feet
apart
Sample Purpose:Sidewall Confirmation Sample.
Notes:
Photos
North facing photo of FS-2 excavated sidewall.South facing photo of FG-2 excavated sidewall.
/FieldNet/Service_Lines/Contaminated_Lands/Env_trench_remediation_qc/even
t_id_12 Page 7 of 8 Pages7/1/2021 5:53:05 PM
In-situ material from 24-30 inches below ground on excavation west sidewall. Excavation depth 2.5 ft.
May 21, 2021
PERSONNEL DATE
(2021)TIME TRUCK # (1)
or description
WEIGHT (2)
in Tons
(estimate)
ORIGIN (3)
(Fence Line or
Bastian Ditch)
DESTINATION (4)
(Trans-Jordan or
Commercial Plat)
TW and KN 05/17/21 10:40 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/17/21 11:09 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/17/21 11:39 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/17/21 13:05 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/17/21 13:27 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/17/21 14:13 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/17/21 14:31 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/17/21 15:43 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/17/21 15:56 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/17/21 16:20 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/17/21 16:39 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/18/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/18/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/18/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/18/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/18/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/18/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/18/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/18/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/18/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/18/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/18/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/19/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
SOIL MANIFESTING LOG
PROJECT No: 20201466
LARK MONOFILL METALS-IMPACTED SOIL REMOVAL
20201466.004A/SLC21R127561
© 2021 Kleinfelder
Page B-1 of B-3 July 1, 2021
PERSONNEL DATE
(2021)TIME TRUCK # (1)
or description
WEIGHT (2)
in Tons
(estimate)
ORIGIN (3)
(Fence Line or
Bastian Ditch)
DESTINATION (4)
(Trans-Jordan or
Commercial Plat)
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/20/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
20201466.004A/SLC21R127561
© 2021 Kleinfelder
Page B-2 of B-3 July 1, 2021
PERSONNEL DATE
(2021)TIME TRUCK # (1)
or description
WEIGHT (2)
in Tons
(estimate)
ORIGIN (3)
(Fence Line or
Bastian Ditch)
DESTINATION (4)
(Trans-Jordan or
Commercial Plat)
TW and KN 05/21/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/24/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW 05/25/21 40 FL CP
TW
05/25/21 40 FL CP
20201466.004A/SLC21R127561
© 2021 Kleinfelder
Page B-3 of B-3 July 1, 2021
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x

C

20201466.004A/SLC21R127561_R1 July 1, 2021
© 2021 Kleinfelder www.kleinfelder.com
APPENDIX C

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION

ANALYTICAL REPORT
June 01, 2021
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC
Sample Delivery Group:L1357191
Samples Received:05/25/2021
Project Number:20201466
Description:Lark MoonfillSoil Removal
Report To:Corinne Hillard
849 W Levoy Dr, Ste 200
Salt Lake City, UT 84123
Entire Report Reviewed By:
June 01, 2021
[Preliminary Report]
Jason Romer
Project Manager
Results relate only to the items tested or calibrated and are reported as rounded values. This test report shall not be
reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. Where applicable, sampling conducted by Pace
Analytical National is performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures ENV-SOP-MTJL-0067 and
ENV-SOP-MTJL-0068. Where sampling conducted by the customer, results relate to the accuracy of the information provided,
and as the samples are received.
Pace Analytical National
12065 Lebanon Rd Mount Juliet, TN 37122 615-758-5858 800-767-5859 www.pacenational.com
1 Cp
2 Tc
3 Ss
4 Cn
5 Sr
6 Qc
7 Gl
8 Al
9 Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:14 1 of 13
June 01, 2021
Jason Romer
Project Manager
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:49 1 of 13
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cp: Cover Page 1
Tc: Table of Contents 2
Ss: Sample Summary 3
Cn: Case Narrative 4
Sr: Sample Results 5
FG-1 L1357191-01 5
FS-1 L1357191-02 6
FG-2 L1357191-03 7
FS-2 L1357191-04 8
Qc: Quality Control Summary 9
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011 9
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010B 10
Gl: Glossary of Terms 11
Al: Accreditations & Locations 12
Sc: Sample Chain of Custody 13
1 Cp
2 Tc
3 Ss
4 Cn
5 Sr
6 Qc
7 Gl
8 Al
9 Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:14 2 of 13
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:49 2 of 13
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time
FG-1 L1357191-01 Solid Kate Nicponski 05/21/21 14:25 05/25/21 08:00
Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location
date/time date/time
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011 WG1678723 1 05/28/21 13:09 05/28/21 13:31 KDW Mt. Juliet, TN
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010B WG1678080 1 05/27/21 16:11 05/28/21 11:37 KMG Mt. Juliet, TN
Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time
FS-1 L1357191-02 Solid Kate Nicponski 05/21/21 14:40 05/25/21 08:00
Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location
date/time date/time
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011 WG1678723 1 05/28/21 13:09 05/28/21 13:31 KDW Mt. Juliet, TN
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010B WG1678080 1 05/27/21 16:11 05/28/21 11:40 KMG Mt. Juliet, TN
Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time
FG-2 L1357191-03 Solid Kate Nicponski 05/21/21 15:00 05/25/21 08:00
Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location
date/time date/time
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011 WG1678723 1 05/28/21 13:09 05/28/21 13:31 KDW Mt. Juliet, TN
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010B WG1678080 1 05/27/21 16:11 05/28/21 11:43 KMG Mt. Juliet, TN
Collected by Collected date/time Received date/time
FS-2 L1357191-04 Solid Kate Nicponski 05/21/21 15:25 05/25/21 08:00
Method Batch Dilution Preparation Analysis Analyst Location
date/time date/time
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011 WG1678723 1 05/28/21 13:09 05/28/21 13:31 KDW Mt. Juliet, TN
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010B WG1678080 1 05/27/21 16:11 05/28/21 11:46 KMG Mt. Juliet, TN
1 Cp
2 Tc
3 Ss
4 Cn
5 Sr
6 Qc
7 Gl
8 Al
9 Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:14 3 of 13
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:49 3 of 13
CASE NARRATIVE
All sample aliquots were received at the correct temperature, in the proper containers, with the
appropriate preservatives, and within method specified holding times, unless qualified or notated within
the report. Where applicable, all MDL (LOD) and RDL (LOQ) values reported for environmental samples
have been corrected for the dilution factor used in the analysis. All Method and Batch Quality Control
are within established criteria except where addressed in this case narrative, a non-conformance form
or properly qualified within the sample results. By my digital signature below, I affirm to the best of my
knowledge, all problems/anomalies observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the
quality of the data have been identified by the laboratory, and no information or data have been
knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.
[Preliminary Report]
Jason Romer
Project Manager
1 Cp
2 Tc
3 Ss
4 Cn
5 Sr
6 Qc
7 Gl
8 Al
9 Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:14 4 of 13
Jason Romer
Project Manager
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:49 4 of 13
SAMPLE RESULTS - 01
L1357191
FG-1
Collected date/time: 05/21/21 14:25
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011
Result Qualifier Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte %date / time
Total Solids 94.9 1 05/28/2021 13:31 WG1678723
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010B
Result (dry)Qualifier RDL (dry)Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg date / time
Arsenic 12.0 2.11 1 05/28/2021 11:37 WG1678080
Lead 105 0.527 1 05/28/2021 11:37 WG1678080
1 Cp
2 Tc
3 Ss
4 Cn
5 Sr
6 Qc
7 Gl
8 Al
9 Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:14 5 of 13
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:49 5 of 13
SAMPLE RESULTS - 02
L1357191
FS-1
Collected date/time: 05/21/21 14:40
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011
Result Qualifier Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte %date / time
Total Solids 93.2 1 05/28/2021 13:31 WG1678723
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010B
Result (dry)Qualifier RDL (dry)Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg date / time
Arsenic 15.9 2.15 1 05/28/2021 11:40 WG1678080
Lead 174 0.537 1 05/28/2021 11:40 WG1678080
1 Cp
2 Tc
3 Ss
4 Cn
5 Sr
6 Qc
7 Gl
8 Al
9 Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:14 6 of 13
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:49 6 of 13
SAMPLE RESULTS - 03
L1357191
FG-2
Collected date/time: 05/21/21 15:00
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011
Result Qualifier Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte %date / time
Total Solids 92.7 1 05/28/2021 13:31 WG1678723
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010B
Result (dry)Qualifier RDL (dry)Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg date / time
Arsenic 11.7 2.16 1 05/28/2021 11:43 WG1678080
Lead 95.2 0.539 1 05/28/2021 11:43 WG1678080
1 Cp
2 Tc
3 Ss
4 Cn
5 Sr
6 Qc
7 Gl
8 Al
9 Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:14 7 of 13
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:49 7 of 13
SAMPLE RESULTS - 04
L1357191
FS-2
Collected date/time: 05/21/21 15:25
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011
Result Qualifier Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte %date / time
Total Solids 92.4 1 05/28/2021 13:31 WG1678723
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010B
Result (dry)Qualifier RDL (dry)Dilution Analysis Batch
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg date / time
Arsenic 11.6 2.16 1 05/28/2021 11:46 WG1678080
Lead 84.7 0.541 1 05/28/2021 11:46 WG1678080
1 Cp
2 Tc
3 Ss
4 Cn
5 Sr
6 Qc
7 Gl
8 Al
9 Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:14 8 of 13
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:49 8 of 13
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1678723
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011 L1357191-01,02,03,04
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3660781-1 05/28/21 13:31
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte %%%
Total Solids 0.00200
L1357191-04 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L1357191-04 05/28/21 13:31 • (DUP) R3660781-3 05/28/21 13:31
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD
Limits
Analyte %%%%
Total Solids 92.4 92.8 1 0.454 10
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3660781-2 05/28/21 13:31
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec.Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
Analyte %%%%
Total Solids 50.0 50.0 100 85.0-115
1 Cp
2 Tc
3 Ss
4 Cn
5 Sr
6 Qc
7 Gl
8 Al
9 Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:14 9 of 13
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:49 9 of 13
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARYWG1678080
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010B L1357191-01,02,03,04
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3660721-1 05/28/21 10:29
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Arsenic U 0.518 2.00
Lead U 0.208 0.500
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3660721-2 05/28/21 10:32
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec.Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg %%
Arsenic 100 93.2 93.2 80.0-120
Lead 100 94.6 94.6 80.0-120
L1356894-02 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L1356894-02 05/28/21 10:34 • (MS) R3660721-5 05/28/21 10:42 • (MSD) R3660721-6 05/28/21 10:44
Spike Amount
(dry)
Original Result
(dry)MS Result (dry)MSD Result
(dry)MS Rec.MSD Rec.Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg %%%%%
Arsenic 109 5.16 100 102 87.6 89.3 1 75.0-125 1.82 20
Lead 109 9.19 107 109 89.9 91.9 1 75.0-125 1.96 20
1 Cp
2 Tc
3 Ss
4 Cn
5 Sr
6 Qc
7 Gl
8 Al
9 Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:14 10 of 13
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:49 10 of 13
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Guide to Reading and Understanding Your Laboratory Report
The information below is designed to better explain the various terms used in your report of analytical results from the Laboratory. This is not
intended as a comprehensive explanation, and if you have additional questions please contact your project representative.
Results Disclaimer - Information that may be provided by the customer, and contained within this report, include Permit Limits, Project Name,
Sample ID, Sample Matrix, Sample Preservation, Field Blanks, Field Spikes, Field Duplicates, On-Site Data, Sampling Collection Dates/Times, and
Sampling Location. Results relate to the accuracy of this information provided, and as the samples are received.
Abbreviations and Definitions
(dry)Results are reported based on the dry weight of the sample. [this will only be present on a dry report basis for soils].
MDL Method Detection Limit.
RDL Reported Detection Limit.
RDL (dry)Reported Detection Limit.
Rec.Recovery.
RPD Relative Percent Difference.
SDG Sample Delivery Group.
U Not detected at the Reporting Limit (or MDL where applicable).
Analyte The name of the particular compound or analysis performed. Some Analyses and Methods will have multiple analytes
reported.
Dilution
If the sample matrix contains an interfering material, the sample preparation volume or weight values differ from the
standard, or if concentrations of analytes in the sample are higher than the highest limit of concentration that the
laboratory can accurately report, the sample may be diluted for analysis. If a value different than 1 is used in this field, the
result reported has already been corrected for this factor.
Limits
These are the target % recovery ranges or % difference value that the laboratory has historically determined as normal
for the method and analyte being reported. Successful QC Sample analysis will target all analytes recovered or
duplicated within these ranges.
Original Sample The non-spiked sample in the prep batch used to determine the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) from a quality control
sample. The Original Sample may not be included within the reported SDG.
Qualifier
This column provides a letter and/or number designation that corresponds to additional information concerning the result
reported. If a Qualifier is present, a definition per Qualifier is provided within the Glossary and Definitions page and
potentially a discussion of possible implications of the Qualifier in the Case Narrative if applicable.
Result
The actual analytical final result (corrected for any sample specific characteristics) reported for your sample. If there was
no measurable result returned for a specific analyte, the result in this column may state “ND” (Not Detected) or “BDL”
(Below Detectable Levels). The information in the results column should always be accompanied by either an MDL
(Method Detection Limit) or RDL (Reporting Detection Limit) that defines the lowest value that the laboratory could detect
or report for this analyte.
Uncertainty
(Radiochemistry)Confidence level of 2 sigma.
Case Narrative (Cn)
A brief discussion about the included sample results, including a discussion of any non-conformances to protocol
observed either at sample receipt by the laboratory from the field or during the analytical process. If present, there will
be a section in the Case Narrative to discuss the meaning of any data qualifiers used in the report.
Quality Control
Summary (Qc)
This section of the report includes the results of the laboratory quality control analyses required by procedure or
analytical methods to assist in evaluating the validity of the results reported for your samples. These analyses are not
being performed on your samples typically, but on laboratory generated material.
Sample Chain of
Custody (Sc)
This is the document created in the field when your samples were initially collected. This is used to verify the time and
date of collection, the person collecting the samples, and the analyses that the laboratory is requested to perform. This
chain of custody also documents all persons (excluding commercial shippers) that have had control or possession of the
samples from the time of collection until delivery to the laboratory for analysis.
Sample Results (Sr)
This section of your report will provide the results of all testing performed on your samples. These results are provided
by sample ID and are separated by the analyses performed on each sample. The header line of each analysis section for
each sample will provide the name and method number for the analysis reported.
Sample Summary (Ss)This section of the Analytical Report defines the specific analyses performed for each sample ID, including the dates and
times of preparation and/or analysis.
Qualifier Description
The remainder of this page intentionally left blank, there are no qualifiers applied to this SDG.
1 Cp
2 Tc
3 Ss
4 Cn
5 Sr
6 Qc
7 Gl
8 Al
9 Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:14 11 of 13
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:49 11 of 13

Pace Analytical National 12065 Lebanon Rd Mount Juliet, TN 37122
Alabama 40660 Nebraska NE-OS-15-05
Alaska 17-026 Nevada TN000032021-1
Arizona AZ0612 New Hampshire 2975
Arkansas 88-0469 New Jersey–NELAP TN002
California 2932 New Mexico ¹TN00003
Colorado TN00003 New York 11742
Connecticut PH-0197 North Carolina Env375
Florida E87487 North Carolina ¹DW21704
Georgia NELAP North Carolina ³41
Georgia ¹923 North Dakota R-140
Idaho TN00003 Ohio–VAP CL0069
Illinois 200008 Oklahoma 9915
Indiana C-TN-01 Oregon TN200002
Iowa 364 Pennsylvania 68-02979
Kansas E-10277 Rhode Island LAO00356
Kentucky ¹ ⁶KY90010 South Carolina 84004002
Kentucky ²16 South Dakota n/a
Louisiana AI30792 Tennessee ¹ ⁴2006
Louisiana LA018 Texas T104704245-20-18
Maine TN00003 Texas ⁵LAB0152
Maryland 324 Utah TN000032021-11
Massachusetts M-TN003 Vermont VT2006
Michigan 9958 Virginia 110033
Minnesota 047-999-395 Washington C847
Mississippi TN00003 West Virginia 233
Missouri 340 Wisconsin 998093910
Montana CERT0086 Wyoming A2LA
A2LA – ISO 17025 1461.01 AIHA-LAP,LLC EMLAP 100789
A2LA – ISO 17025 ⁵1461.02 DOD 1461.01
Canada 1461.01 USDA P330-15-00234
EPA–Crypto TN00003
ACCREDITATIONS & LOCATIONS

¹ Drinking Water ² Underground Storage Tanks ³ Aquatic Toxicity ⁴ Chemical/Microbiological ⁵ Mold ⁶ Wastewater n/a Accreditation not applicable
* Not all certifications held by the laboratory are applicable to the results reported in the attached report.
* Accreditation is only applicable to the test methods specified on each scope of accreditation held by Pace Analytical.
1 Cp
2 Tc
3 Ss
4 Cn
5 Sr
6 Qc
7 Gl
8 Al
9 Sc
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:14 12 of 13
ACCOUNT:PROJECT:SDG:DATE/TIME:PAGE:
GSC/Kleinfelder - SLC 20201466 L1357191 06/01/21 11:49 12 of 13